No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400021 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2014-05-28�pF A vt�r�1Q COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Cash Corner (Howard Property) Verizon Wireless Tier II PWSFI Plan preparer: Justin Yoon, Clark - Nexsen Architecture and Engineering [1331 L Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005, www.clarknexsen.com] Owner or rep.: Alan B. Howard [2176 Lindsay Road, Gordonsville, VA 22942] Stephen Waller, AICP, Verizon Wireless [536 Pantops Center — PMB #405, Charlottesville, VA 22911; stephen- waller&gmail.com Plan received date: 06- May- 201416 April 2014 Date of comments: 28 May 2014 Reviewer: John Anderson A. Stormwater Management Plan - requested 1. Fee /Application for SWM- Please contact reviewer to discuss WPO (stormwater management review) prior to submitting fee, plans, or supporting documentation. Pre - application discussion may limit need or extent of possible revisions. Certain changes will be required under SWM review, and revision prior to initial SWM application submission could save time. There is also a pending date, July 1St, when the regulations will change, and this could affect this project. B. Erosion Control Plan (WP0201400040) 1. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Narrative, a 12 -p supporting document with Appendix should be numbered. Transfer Erosion and Sediment Control VESCH details, instructions, or measures to the plans. Unless ESC information is included on plan sheets, there is little chance it will be noticed or enacted during construction. 2. Remove or re -title sheet C -4, titled Enlarged Site Plan. Site Plans cannot be approved as part of WPO Application (Also, sect. C., item 1, below). E &S Legend, Sheet C -4A, includes culvert inlet protection (IP) and outlet protection (OP). Please show IP and OP for new 15" entrance pipe located at intersection of access drive and Lindsay Road (sheet C -413, or C -41)). 4. Sheet C -4G, Note 8: "Perform site clearing to the limits shown on the plans." Limits of disturbance are not shown; please show LOD on plans. 5. Identify off -site disposal areas. Identify construction staging area. Identify stockpile locations. 6. Show tree protection (TP) for 14" OAK, sheet C -4C, if tree is to be saved (tree shown near Alan B. Howard deed book information). Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 7. Page 11 of the ESC Plan Narrative states that "Topsoil will be used to help provide a suitable growth medium for vegetation." Please identify topsoil locations, with specific details (spec 3.30, TO). Page 11 also states "Sediment shall be removed and the impoundment restored to its original dimensions when sediment has accumulated to one -half the design depth." This statement appears to relate to a sediment trap or basin not shown on plans. Please clarify. 8. Page 8 of the ESC Plan Narrative states that "During construction, the contractor will divert runoff around disturbed areas to reduce the amount of stormwater which could come into contact with exposed soils. One method of creating a diversion is by installing temporary dike /swales within the area of work." Please identify diversion dikes in plan view that correspond with stated plan to divert runoff during construction. Diverted runoff must release to a sediment trap or basin. 9. Plan views show an 11' -12' wide driveway. Narrative describes a 20 -ft driveway. Please clarify (show access drive 20 -ft wide, or revise narrative). 10. Remove sheets C -5, A -1, but include typical access road cross section elsewhere. C. Site Plan (SDP201400021) 1. Separate from WPO. Site plan may not be approved as part of a WPO. 2. ESC and a SWM Plan must be approved prior to final site plan approval (ESC Plan Review: requested changes, above). 3. Entrance, sheet C -4G: Replace Private Entrance Detail with VDOT Private and Low - Volume Commercial Entrance Detail {ref: VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F, Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections, Section 4, Private and Low Volume Commercial Entrances) Detail, below- Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 Pipe culvert if necessary Ditch flow line Shoulder Entrance details, including widths shown I on this sheet, may be modified to meet specific site requirements as directed or I approved by the Engineer when based on I sound engineering principles. — Edge of Roadway Pavement Roadway Pavement FIGURE 4 -1 PRIVATE ENTRANCE AND LOW VOLUME COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE DETAIL Rev. 1113 4. Sheet C -5: Specify finished material (driveway surface: crusher run, No. 25, No. 26, etc); specify depth of surface (if stone; 1 -2" required). 5. Provide adequate stopping sight distance —ref: VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F, Private and Low Volume Commercial Entrances, item 1. Show adequate sight distance for access drive entrance at Lindsay Road, on plans. File: WP0201400040 -cash corner (howard property) Verizon- 052814 12 FT. Minimum; 24 F1. Maximum Width Surfaced 10 o o d 16 Ft. Minimum Width Y m Graded " R =20' Minimum a 1-2 ° 3 m Ld '6-a — Edge of Roadway Pavement Roadway Pavement FIGURE 4 -1 PRIVATE ENTRANCE AND LOW VOLUME COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE DETAIL Rev. 1113 4. Sheet C -5: Specify finished material (driveway surface: crusher run, No. 25, No. 26, etc); specify depth of surface (if stone; 1 -2" required). 5. Provide adequate stopping sight distance —ref: VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F, Private and Low Volume Commercial Entrances, item 1. Show adequate sight distance for access drive entrance at Lindsay Road, on plans. File: WP0201400040 -cash corner (howard property) Verizon- 052814 Brent Nelson From: stephen.waller @gdnsites.com Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 10:02 AM To: Brent Nelson Subject: RE: SDP201400021, Verizon -Cash Corner, WPO Brent, I received your voice mail and this email but I'm in a meeting and not able to answer your call right now. I have no problem with referring our application until the WPO review has been completed and is approved. Because I see this as being no different than past projects when we have known that we cannot pull a building permit prior to having approval of the E &SC plans. So my end this is nothing that out of the ordinary. It would also be my understanding that we had already acknowledged that the shot clock is no longer relevant to this particular application as we voluntarily deferred action on it by resubmitting the revised plans late and paying the reinstatement fees after taking an additional week to get the full WPO in order for submittal. Please let me know if you still need to speak further on this issue and I can return your call when I am free. Thanks, Steve Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -- - - - - -- Original message -- - - - - -- From: Brent Nelson Date:05 /23/2014 9:27 AM (GMT- 05:00) To: Stephen Waller Subject: SDP201400021, Verizon -Cash Corner, WPO Hi Steve - I want to update you on the status of your WPO plan (WP0201400040). I just spoke with John Anderson, the engineer reviewing your application, and his plan is to review it on Tuesday. The short staffing and high work load has them behind schedule. Also, because of the 90 day shot clock, I just learned that we are supposed to deny an application if the WPO is not approved within that 90 days. It looks like we are on day 89 today. The way to avoid that is for you to send me an email requesting an indefinite deferral of SDP201400021, Verizon Cash Corner, Howard Property — to allow needed time to complete the review and approval of the associated WP0201400040. I tried to call you just now and your voicemail box was full, so I thought I would send this email instead. Brent Brent W. Nelson Planner Planning Services Department of Community Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3438 Brent Nelson From: Brent Nelson Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 9:28 AM To: 'Stephen Waller' Subject: SDP201400021, Verizon -Cash Corner, WPO Importance: High Hi Steve - I want to update you on the status of your WPO plan (WP0201400040). I just spoke with John Anderson, the engineer reviewing your application, and his plan is to review it on Tuesday. The short staffing and high work load has them behind schedule. Also, because of the 90 day shot clock, I just learned that we are supposed to deny an application if the WPO is not approved within that 90 days. It looks like we are on day 89 today. The way to avoid that is for you to send me an email requesting an indefinite deferral of SDP201400021, Verizon Cash Corner, Howard Property — to allow needed time to complete the review and approval of the associated WP0201400040. I tried to call you just now and your voicemail box was full, so I thought I would send this email instead. Brent Brent W. Nelson Planner Planning Services Department of Community Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3438 Brent Nelson From: Alex Morrison [amorrison @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:42 PM To: Brent Nelson Subject: SDP201400021: Verizon Wireless, Cash Corner - Howard Property Tier II Personal Wireless Service Facility Brent, The above referenced plan is outside of the ACSA's Jurisdictional Area. The ACSA has no comments and hereby approves the plan. Alexander J. Morrison, EIT Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (0) 434 - 977 -4511 Ext. 116 (F) 434 - 979 -0698 1 Sr � COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development Planning Services 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 April 9, 2014 Stephen Waller 536 Pantops Center, PMB 405 Charlottesville, VA 22911 -0000 RE: SDP - 2014 -00021 Cash Corner Howard Property (Verizon) Tier 11 PWSF Dear Sir, The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Engineering — recommendation (attached) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Planner) — requested changes (attached) Albemarle County Division of Inspections — no objection Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue — no objection Albemarle County Division of Information Services (E911) — approved Virginia Department of Transportation — recommendation (attached) Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit (4) four [I I" x 17 "] copies to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by Monday, April 21, 2014. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Brent Nelson, Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Planning Services 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 229024596 Email: bnelson @albemarle.org Phone: (434) 296 -5832 Ext 3438 Fax: (434) 9724126 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Stephen Waller (Stephen.waller @gdnsites.com) From: Brent Nelson - Planner Division: Planning Services Date: April 9, 2014 Subject: SDP - 201400021- Cash Corner, Howard Property - Tier II PWSF The Planner for the Planning Division of the Albemarle County Department of Community Development will recommend approval for the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review. Comments are preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code. [5.1.4(c)(4)] Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a tree conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist. The plan shall be submitted to the agent for review and approval to assure that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The plan shall speck tree protection methods and procedures, and identify all existing trees to be removed on the parcel for the installation, operation and maintenance of the facility. [5.1.4(c) (5)] The installation, operation and maintenance of the facility shall be conducted in accordance with the tree conservation plan. Dead and dying trees identified by the arborist's report may be removed if so noted on the tree conservation plan. If tree removal is later requested that was not approved by the agent when the tree conservation plan was approved, the applicant shall submit an amended plan. The agent may approve the amended plan if the proposed tree removal will not adversely affect the visibility of the facility from any location off of the parcel. The agent may impose reasonable conditions to assure that the purposes of this paragraph are achieved Sheet C -4B Enlarged Grading Plan shows proposed grading and the installation of fencing within the drip line of an existing tree designated to remain. A tree conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist verifying that the tree could survive this impact is required for a building permit to be issued. 2. [5.1.40 (f] Trees. The height, caliper and species of all trees where the dripline is located within fifty (50) feet of the facility that are relied upon to establish the proposed height or screening, or both, of the monopole or tower. All trees that will be adversely impacted or removed during installation or maintenance of the facility shall be noted, regardless of their distances to the facility. On Sheet C -2 Tree Inventory, the existing tree directly east of the facility does not have a tree inventory number. Revise the drawing to indicate the tree inventory number. 3. [5.1.4(c)(7)] The owner of the facility shall submit a report to the agent by no earlier than May or no later than July I of each year. The report shall identify each user of the existing structure, and include a drawing, photograph or other illustration identifying which equipment is owned and/or operated by each personal wireless service provider. Multiple users on a single tower or other mounting structure may submit a single report, provided that the report includes a statement signed by a representative from each user acquiescing in the report. This is not a condition of approval for the proposal under review, just a reminder. 4. [5.1.40 (4) (e]) Topography. Except where the facility would be attached to an existing structure or an existing building, the topography within two thousand (2,000) feet of the proposed facility, in contour intervals not to exceed ten (10) feet for all lands within Albemarle County and, in contour intervals shown on United States Geological Survey topographic survey maps or the best topographic data available, for lands not within Albemarle County. Sheet C -lA Area Map shows the parcels within a 2,000' radius of the site; however, the topo within that 2,000 radius is not shown. Revise the drawing to include the topo, in contour intervals not exceeding ten (10) feet. S. [5.1.40 (d)(7]) Color of monopole, antennas and equipment. Each monopole shall be a dark brown natural or painted wood color that blends into the surrounding trees. The antennas, supporting brackets, and all other equipment attached to the monopole shall be a color that closely matches that of the monopole. The ground equipment, the ground equipment shelter, and the concrete pad shall also be a color that closely matches that of the monopole, provided that the ground equipment and the concrete pad need not closely match the color of the monopole if they are enclosed within a ground equipment shelter or within or behind an approved structure, faVade or fencing that. (i) is a color that closely matches that of the monopole; (ii) is consistent with the character of the area; and (iii) makes the ground equipment, ground equipment shelter, and the concrete pad invisible at any time of year from any other parcel or a public or private street. On Sheet C -5 Civil Details, add a note to the sheet indicating that the fence will be painted Java Brown to match the monopole. 6. Miscellaneous: a. On Sheet G -1 Cover Sheet, the zoning is mislabeled as A -1 (should be RA), the parcel is mislabeled as TMP 50 -42A (should be TMP 50 -41A) and the acreage is listed as 96 (should be 61.86 acres). Revise the drawing to correct. b. Sheet C -5 Civil Details shows a chain link fence detail but chain link fencing is not proposed on the site plan. Remove the chain link fence detail if it is not to be used. Please contact Brent Nelson at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext 3438 for further information. 2 T R COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper. Virgirra 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner April 4, 2014 Mr. Brent Nelson County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP - 2014 -00021 Verizon Wireless, Cash Corner - Howard Property Dear Mr. Nelson: We have reviewed the site plan for the Verizon Wireless facility located on Route 615 on the Howard Property dated 1!10/14 as submitted by Clark Nexsen and offer the following comments: 1. The proposed entrance to Route 615 will is acceptable. The entrance will need to be improved to PE -1 standards. Prior to this work occurring, a Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office. 2. VDOT has no objection to this project provided that the entrance is improved as indicated above. If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, /AT AALJ;� Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Review Comments Project Name: Verizon Wireless "Cash Corner " - Howard Personal Wireless Facility SP Date Completed: JWednesday, April 09, 2014 Reviewer: Max Greene Department/Division /Agency: Engineering Reviews Plan appears to show land disturbance in excess of 10,000 square feet and will require an Erosion and Sediment Control plan to be submitted and approved prior to final site plan approval. Review Status: See Recommendations vIRGIN� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Stephen Waller (Stephen.waller @gdnsites.com) From: Brent Nelson - Planner Division: Planning Services Date: April 9, 2014 Subject: SDP - 201400021- Cash Corner, Howard Property - Tier II PWSF The Planner for the Planning Division of the Albemarle County Department of Community Development will recommend approval for the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review. Comments are preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code. [5.1.4(c)(4)] Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a tree conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist. The plan shall be submitted to the agent for review and approval to assure that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The plan shall specify tree protection methods and procedures, and identify all existing trees to be removed on the parcel for the installation, operation and maintenance of the facility. [5.1.4(c) (5)] The installation, operation and maintenance of the facility shall be conducted in accordance with the tree conservation plan. Dead and dying trees identified by the arborist's report may be removed if so noted on the tree conservation plan. If tree removal is later requested that was not approved by the agent when the tree conservation plan was approved, the applicant shall submit an amended plan. The agent may approve the amended plan if the proposed tree removal will not adversely affect the visibility of the facility from any location off of the parcel. The agent may impose reasonable conditions to assure that the purposes of this paragraph are achieved Sheet C -4B Enlarged Grading Plan shows proposed grading and the installation of fencing within the drip line of an existing tree designated to remain. A tree conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist verifying that the tree could survive this impact is required for a building permit to be issued. 2. [5.1.40 (f] Trees. The height, caliper and species of all trees where the dripline is located within fifty (50) feet of the facility that are relied upon to establish the proposed height or screening, or both, of the monopole or tower. All trees that will be adversely impacted or removed during installation or maintenance of the facility shall be noted, regardless of their distances to the facility. On Sheet C -2 Tree Inventory, the existing tree directly east of the facility does not have a tree inventory number. Revise the drawing to indicate the tree inventory number. 3. [5.1.4(c)(7)] The owner of the facility shall submit a report to the agent by no earlier than May or no later than July I of each year. The report shall identify each user of the existing structure, and include a drawing, photograph or other illustration identifying which equipment is owned and /or operated by each personal wireless service provider. Multiple users on a single tower or other mounting structure may submit a single report, provided that the report includes a statement signed by a representative from each user acquiescing in the report. This is not a condition of approval for the proposal under review, just a reminder. 4. [5.1.40 (4) (e]) Topography. Except where the facility would be attached to an existing structure or an existing building, the topography within two thousand (2, 000) feet of the proposed facility, in contour intervals not to exceed ten (10) feet for all lands within Albemarle County and, in contour intervals shown on United States Geological Survey topographic survey maps or the best topographic data available, for lands not within Albemarle County. Sheet C -IA Area Map shows the parcels within a 2,000' radius of the site; however, the topo within that 2,000 radius is not shown. Revise the drawing to include the topo, in contour intervals not exceeding ten (10) feet. 5. [5.1.40 (d)(7]) Color of monopole, antennas and equipment. Each monopole shall be a dark brown natural or painted wood color that blends into the surrounding trees. The antennas, supporting brackets, and all other equipment attached to the monopole shall be a color that closely matches that of the monopole. The ground equipment, the ground equipment shelter, and the concrete pad shall also be a color that closely matches that of the monopole, provided that the ground equipment and the concrete pad need not closely match the color of the monopole if they are enclosed within a ground equipment shelter or within or behind an approved structure, fagade or fencing that: (i) is a color that closely matches that of the monopole; (ii) is consistent with the character of the area; and (iii) makes the ground equipment, ground equipment shelter, and the concrete pad invisible at any time of year from any other parcel or a public or private street. On Sheet C -5 Civil Details, add a note to the sheet indicating that the fence will be painted Java Brown to match the monopole. Miscellaneous: a. On Sheet G -1 Cover Sheet, the zoning is mislabeled as A -1 (should be RA), the parcel is mislabeled as TMP 50 -42A (should be TMP 50 -41A) and the acreage is listed as 96 (should be 61.86 acres). Revise the drawing to correct. b. Sheet C -5 Civil Details shows a chain link fence detail but chain link fencing is not proposed on the site plan. Remove the chain link fence detail if it is not to be used. Please contact Brent Nelson at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext 3438 for further information. .a3.. n1�r COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner April 4, 2014 Mr. Brent Nelson County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP - 2014 -00021 Verizon Wireless, Cash Corner —Howard Property Dear Mr. Nelson: We have reviewed the site plan for the Verizon Wireless facility located on Route 615 on the Howard Property dated 1110114 as submitted by Clark Nexsen and offer the following comments: 1. The proposed entrance to Route 615 will is acceptable. The entrance will need to be improved to PE -1 standards. Prior to this work occurring, a Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office. 2. VDOT has no objection to this project provided that the entrance is improved as indicated above. If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, IA� A&�' Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING �pF A �'717G1L31P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Cash Corner (Howard Property) Verizon Wireless Tier II PWSFI Plan preparer: Justin Yoon, Clark - Nexsen Architecture and Engineering [1331 L Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005, www.clarknexsen.com] Owner or rep.: Alan B. Howard [2176 Lindsay Road, Gordonsville, VA 22942] Stephen Waller, AICP, Verizon Wireless [536 Pantops Center — PMB #405, Charlottesville, VA 22911; stephen- wallerkgmail.com Plan received date: 06- May- 201416 April 2014 Date of comments: 28 May 2014 Reviewer: John Anderson A. Stormwater Management Plan - requested 1. Fee /Application for SWM- Please contact reviewer to discuss WPO (stormwater management review) prior to submitting fee, plans, or supporting documentation. Pre - application discussion may limit need or extent of possible revisions. Certain changes will be required under SWM review, and revision prior to initial SWM application submission could save time. There is also a pending date, July 1St, when the regulations will change, and this could affect this project. B. Erosion Control Plan (WP0201400040) 1. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Narrative, a 12 -p supporting document with Appendix should be numbered. Transfer Erosion and Sediment Control VESCH details, instructions, or measures to the plans. Unless ESC information is included on plan sheets, there is little chance it will be noticed or enacted during construction. 2. Remove or re -title sheet C -4, titled Enlarged Site Plan. Site Plans cannot be approved as part of WPO Application (Also, sect. C., item 1, below). 3. E &S Legend, Sheet C -4A, includes culvert inlet protection (IP) and outlet protection (OP). Please show IP and OP for new 15" entrance pipe located at intersection of access drive and Lindsay Road (sheet C -413, or C -41)). 4. Sheet C -4G, Note 8: "Perform site clearing to the limits shown on the plans." Limits of disturbance are not shown; please show LOD on plans. 5. Identify off -site disposal areas. Identify construction staging area. Identify stockpile locations. 6. Show tree protection (TP) for 14" OAK, sheet C -4C, if tree is to be saved (tree shown near Alan B. Howard deed book information). Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 7. Page 11 of the ESC Plan Narrative states that "Topsoil will be used to help provide a suitable growth medium for vegetation." Please identify topsoil locations, with specific details (spec 3.30, TO). Page 11 also states "Sediment shall be removed and the impoundment restored to its original dimensions when sediment has accumulated to one -half the design depth." This statement appears to relate to a sediment trap or basin not shown on plans. Please clarify. 8. Page 8 of the ESC Plan Narrative states that "During construction, the contractor will divert runoff around disturbed areas to reduce the amount of stormwater which could come into contact with exposed soils. One method of creating a diversion is by installing temporary dike /swales within the area of work." Please identify diversion dikes in plan view that correspond with stated plan to divert runoff during construction. Diverted runoff must release to a sediment trap or basin. 9. Plan views show an 11' -12' wide driveway. Narrative describes a 20 -ft driveway. Please clarify (show access drive 20 -ft wide, or revise narrative). 10. Remove sheets C -5, A -1, but include typical access road cross section elsewhere. C. Site Plan (SDP201400021) 1. Separate from WPO. Site plan may not be approved as part of a WPO. 2. ESC and a SWM Plan must be approved prior to final site plan approval (ESC Plan Review: requested changes, above). 3. Entrance, sheet C -4G: Replace Private Entrance Detail with VDOT Private and Low - Volume Commercial Entrance Detail {ref: VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F, Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections, Section 4, Private and Low Volume Commercial Entrances} Detail, below- Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 Pipe culvert if necessary D't h fl f Entrance details, including widths shown I on this sheet, may be modified to meet I specific site requirements as directed or w approved by the Engineer when based on I I sound engineering principles. I I I I I I I I I I I I 12 FT Minimum, 24 F1. Maximum Width Surfaced 16 Ft. Minimum Width Graded c �61cm oo® � � m I c ow Ine R =20' Minimum CD o ° 3 Shoulder x 3 iLd oa — Edge of Roadway Pavement Roadway Pavement FIGURE 4 -1 PRIVATE ENTRANCE AND LOW VOLUME COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE DETAIL' Rev. 1113 4. Sheet C -5: Specify finished material (driveway surface: crusher run, No. 25, No. 26, etc); specify depth of surface (if stone; 1 -2" required). 5. Provide adequate stopping sight distance — ref: VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F, Private and Low Volume Commercial Entrances, item 1. Show adequate sight distance for access drive entrance at Lindsay Road, on plans. File: WP0201400040 -cash comer (howard property) Verizon- 052814 C�OAF ALBS, 'time 'we IRG1NlP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development Planning Services 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 April 9,2014 Stephen Waller 536 Pantops Center,PMB 405 Charlottesville,VA 22911-0000 RE: SDP-2014-00021 Cash Corner Howard Property(Verizon)Tier II PWSF Dear Sir, The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Engineering—recommendation(attached) Albemarle County Division of Planning(Planner)—requested changes(attached) Albemarle County Division of Inspections—no objection Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue—no objection Albemarle County Division of Information Services(E911)—approved Virginia Department of Transportation—recommendation(attached) Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final.However,the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit (4) four [11" x 17"] copies to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by Monday, April 21, 2014. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of$65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, !t 1z.1, ` Brent Nelson,Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Planning Services 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596 Email:bnelson @albemarle.org Phone: (434)296-5832 Ext 3438 Fax: (434)972-4126 Name ftrie pF AL� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Stephen Waller(Stephen.waller @gdnsites.com) From: Brent Nelson -Planner Division: Planning Services Date: April 9, 2014 Subject: SDP-201400021-Cash Corner,Howard Property-Tier II PWSF The Planner for the Planning Division of the Albemarle County Department of Community Development will recommend approval for the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review. Comments are preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code. 1. [5.1.4(c)(4)] Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a tree conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist. The plan shall be submitted to the agent for review and approval to assure that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The plan shall speck tree protection methods and procedures, and identify all existing trees to be removed on the parcel for the installation, operation and maintenance of the facility. [5.1.4(c) (5)] The installation, operation and maintenance of the facility shall be conducted in accordance with the tree conservation plan. Dead and dying trees identified by the arborist's report may be removed if so noted on the tree conservation plan. If tree removal is later requested that was not approved by the agent when the tree conservation plan was approved, the applicant shall submit an amended plan. The agent may approve the amended plan if the proposed tree removal will not adversely affect the visibility of the facility from any location off of the parcel. The agent may impose reasonable conditions to assure that the purposes of this paragraph are achieved Sheet C-4B Enlarged Grading Plan shows proposed grading and the installation of fencing within the drip line of an existing tree designated to remain. A tree conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist verifying that the tree could survive this impact is required for a building permit to be issued. 2. [5.1.40 (f] Trees. The height, caliper and species of all trees where the dripline is located within fifty (50)feet of the facility that are relied upon to establish the proposed height or screening, or both, of the monopole or tower. All trees that will be adversely impacted or removed during installation or maintenance of the facility shall be noted, regardless of their distances to the facility. On Sheet C-2 Tree Inventory, the existing tree directly east of the facility does not have a tree inventory number. Revise the drawing to indicate the tree inventory number. 3. [5.1.4(c)(7)] The owner of the facility shall submit a report to the agent by no earlier than May or no later than July 1 of each year. The report shall identify each user of the existing structure, and include a drawing, photograph or other illustration identdying which equipment is owned and/or operated by each personal wireless service provider. Multiple users on a single tower or other mounting structure may submit a single report, 1 provided that the report includes a statement signed by a representative from each user acquiescing in the report. This is not a condition of approval for the proposal under review,just a reminder. 4. [5.1.40 (4) (e]) Topography. Except where the facility would be attached to an existing structure or an existing building, the topography within two thousand(2,000)feet of the proposed facility, in contour intervals not to exceed ten (10)feet for all lands within Albemarle County and, in contour intervals shown on United States Geological Survey topographic survey maps or the best topographic data available, for lands not within Albemarle County. Sheet C-1A Area Map shows the parcels within a 2,000' radius of the site; however, the topo within that 2,000 radius is not shown. Revise the drawing to include the topo, in contour intervals not exceeding ten(10)feet. S. [5.1.40 (d)(7]) Color of monopole, antennas and equipment. Each monopole shall be a dark brown natural or painted wood color that blends into the surrounding trees. The antennas, supporting brackets, and all other equipment attached to the monopole shall be a color that closely matches that of the monopole. The ground equipment, the ground equipment shelter, and the concrete pad shall also be a color that closely matches that of the monopole,provided that the ground equipment and the concrete pad need not closely match the color of the monopole if they are enclosed within a ground equipment shelter or within or behind an approved structure, façade or fencing that: (i) is a color that closely matches that of the monopole; (ii) is consistent with the character of the area; and (iii) makes the ground equipment, ground equipment shelter, and the concrete pad invisible at any time of year from any other parcel or a public or private street. On Sheet C-5 Civil Details, add a note to the sheet indicating that the fence will be painted Java Brown to match the monopole. 6. Miscellaneous: a. On Sheet G-1 Cover Sheet, the zoning is mislabeled as A-1 (should be RA), the parcel is mislabeled as TMP 50-42A (should be TMP 50-41A) and the acreage is listed as 96 (should be 61.86 acres). Revise the drawing to correct. b. Sheet C-5 Civil Details shows a chain link fence detail but chain link fencing is not proposed on the site plan. Remove the chain link fence detail if it is not to be used. Please contact Brent Nelson at the Department of Community Development 296-5832 ext 3438 for further information. 2 NNW N■rasof ,t.._ (•1.n�` seta 4 r"‘ Ll:: COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper,Virgirra 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick,P.E. Commissioner April 4, 2014 Mr. Brent Nelson County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Re: SDP-2014-00021 Verizon Wireless, Cash Corner- Howard Property Dear Mr.Nelson: We have reviewed the site plan for the Verizon Wireless facility located on Route 615 on the Howard Property dated 1/10/14 as submitted by Clark Nexsen and offer the following comments: 1. The proposed entrance to Route 615 will is acceptable. The entrance will need to be improved to PE-1 standards. Prior to this work occurring, a Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office. 2. VDOT has no objection to this project provided that the entrance is improved as indicated above. If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, //141 AtAl Troy Austin,P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Review Comments Project Name: Verizon Wireless"Cash Corner"-Howard Personal Wireless Facility SP Property PWSF-Tier II Date Completed: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 Reviewer: Max Greene Department/Division/Agency: Engineering Reviews Comments: Plan appears to show land disturbance in excess of 10,000 square feet and will require an Erosion and Sediment Control plan to be submitted and approved prior to final site plan approval. Review Status: See Recommendations *ter itl!' V i 5. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1661 Orange Road Culpeper,Vvgin•a 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick,P.E. Commissioner April 4, 2014 Mr. Brent Nelson County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP-2014-00021 Verizon Wireless, Cash Corner— Howard Property Dear Mr. Nelson. We have reviewed the site plan for the Verizon Wireless facility located on Route 615 on the Howard Property dated 1/10/14 as submitted by Clark Nexsen and offer the following comments: 1. The proposed entrance to Route 615 will is acceptable. The entrance will need to be improved to PE-1 standards. Prior to this work occurring, a Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office. 2. VDOT has no objection to this project provided that the entrance is improved as indicated above. If you need additional information concerning this project,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, A07-1 * 0 Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Nett Brent Nelson From: Alex Morrison [amorrison @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:42 PM To: Brent Nelson Subject: SDP201400021: Verizon Wireless, Cash Corner- Howard Property Tier II Personal Wireless Service Facility Brent, The above referenced plan is outside of the ACSA's Jurisdictional Area.The ACSA has no comments and hereby approves the plan. Alexander J. Morrison, EIT Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22911 (0)434-977-4511 Ext. 116 (F) 434-979-0698 1