The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutARB201400072 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2014-07-01ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB- 2014 -72: Goodwill Mill Creek Review Type Final Site Plan Parcel Identification 077000000047AO Location At the northeast corner of the intersection of Avon Street Extended with Mill Creek Drive Zoned Planned Development Shopping Center (PDSC), Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner /Applicant Blakeley T or Jennifer Parham Greenhalgh/Balzer & Assoc. (Kent O'Donahue) and Bob Pingry Magisterial District Scottsville Proposal To construct a 10,400 sf commercial building with associated parking on an outparcel in the South Side Shopping Center development. Context The immediate context of the site is the South Side Shopping Center, a brick building with a Food Lion grocery store as its major tenant. To the south across Mill Creek Drive is a convenience store with fuel pump canopy and car wash, and a bank. Further to the east is a high school and fire station. Across Avon Street to the west is the Mill Creek residential development. Visibility The north, south and west elevations of the proposed building will be readily visible from the Entrance Corridor, but the lower parts of the walls will be hidden by the slope of the land along Avon Street and Mill Creek Drive. ARB Meeting Date July 7, 2014 Staff Contact Margaret Maliszewski PROJECT HISTORY The ARB completed a review of the initial site plan and preliminary architectural design for this proposal on April 21, 2014. See Attachment A for the action letter from that meeting. C�►[e ixyllC �l IY01��: Z17 Z17. Y�1�. y1� [y�IY.I�r/:T.�IYM :��►� /I�►L'/ Existing landscaping has been more accurately shown on the plan. The donation drop -off entrance on the Avon Street side of the building has been shifted slightly to the south. Due to setback issues, the gable over the donation drop -off entrance has been reduced in depth. Detailing has been retained to coordinate with the main entrance on the Mill Creek side of the building. Detailing has been revised for better proportions and integration of the entrance elements into the overall building. The compactor screen wall has been extended. The opening into the compactor area is oriented away from the EC. A loading bay has been added at the east end of the north elevation. Landscaping has been added. ANALYSIS REF GUIDELINE COMMENT FROM 4/21/2014 MEETING ISSUE RECOMMENDATION 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development Indicate on the drawings the material and color The locations of the entrance features have None. within the designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that intended for the back of the pedimented been coordinated on the site plan drawing. The new development within the corridors reflects the entrance features. Choose a material and color red brick used for the majority of the building traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the that is integrated with the overall building. is identified as the material for the backs of the purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that pediments of the entrance features. This is proposed development within the designated Entrance Revise the site plan to show the entrance expected to produce a coordinated appearance Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the pavilion. for the building. significant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote Confirm that the lighter color horizontal courses The lighter horizontal brick courses have been orderly and attractive development within these corridors. shown in the color renderings are a lighter color identified as Brick B, Watsontown Carleton Applicants should note that replication of historic structures brick, as is seen in the existing shopping center. Velour, which is a white brick. The brick used is neither required nor desired. Identify the material and color on the drawings. for the detailing in the original building has been discontinued. The Watsontown Carleton 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the traditions of the architecture Velour is considered a close match. Brick A, of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville the red brick used for the majority of the and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in building, is General Shale Full Range Red the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, Wirecut brick. The contrasting red and white which provide important examples of this tradition are bricks are expected to appear coordinated with contained in Appendix A. the main shopping center building. Samples of both bricks have been submitted for review. 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well asspecial functional requirements. 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines. 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Adjust the brick detailing to eliminate the top- The detailing of the walls has been revised so None. Scale should be integral to the building and site design. heavy appearance of the walls. that the brick course located above the windows, and extending across the elevations, 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive now divides the elevations with a taller whole. proportion below the brick course and a shorter proportion above it. This has eliminated the top -heavy appearance. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building See recommendations at guidelines 17, 18, 19. See comments at guidelines 17, 18, and 19. See recommendations at design should be relieved using design detail or vegetation, guidelines 17, 18, and 19. or both. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting None. Materials and details are used to visually None devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within connect the proposed and existing buildings. a development. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be None. The proposed building is not a trademark None. modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. design. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly Provide on the plan window glass details The note appears on the architectural drawings. None. tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the Entrance indicating that visible light transmittance (VLT) Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light shall not drop below 40% and visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 4001o. Visible reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30 %. light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30 %. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for final review. Li htin 22 Light should be contained on the site and not spill over Revise the maintenance factor (LLF) to 1.0 for The photometrics have been calculated using a None. onto adjacent properties or streets; all proposed light fixtures and recalculate the photometrics. Provide a point -by -point grid maintenance factor of 1.0 and a point by point grid has been provided. Maximum light levels 24 Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots in the Entrance Corridors. Lower light style photometric plan for review. are 6.1 fc. Spillover meets requirements. levels will apply to most other uses in the Entrance Corridors. 23 Light should be shielded, recessed or flush - mounted to Provide cut sheets for the proposed light fixtures Cut sheets for the proposed light fixtures have None. eliminate glare. All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 in the site plan. been included in the site plan. Pole lights for lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures. the parking lot are shoe box fixtures like the existing ones in the shopping center. Lamps are 25 Light should have the appearance of white light with a Confirm that the proposed lamp type matches warm soft glow; however, a consistent appearance that which is currently used in the shopping metal halide, like those previously approved. throughout a site or development is required. Consequently, center. Downlights are also proposed at the main if existing lamps that emit non -white light are to remain, entrance to the building. new lamps may be required to match them. 27 The height and scale of freestanding, pole - mounted light None. fixtures should be compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites they are illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding pole- mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height will typically require additional screening to achieve an appropriate appearance from the Entrance Corridor. 28 In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration on a case by case basis. 26 Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors Identify the fixture and pole colors in the light Bronze is identified on the fixture cut sheets. None. for free-standing pole mounted light fixtures in the schedule or with a note on the lighting plan. Entrance Corridors. Bronze is recommended. 29 The following note should be included on the lighting plan: Include the standard lighting note on the plan. The note has been added to sheet L1. None. "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping Show on the plan the shrubs that exist along Existing trees and shrubs have been shown None. are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of Avon and Mill Creek. Show the existing trees with more accurate drip lines. The telephone many of the area's significant historic sites which is and shrubs that are to remain with accurate drip and power lines have been shifted to the north characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping lines. corner of the building, where there is less should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor interference with planting areas. and help to integrate buildings into the existing Move the new telephone and power lines environment of the corridor. outside of planting areas. 8 Redbuds are proposed along the Avon Street frontage. An additional Zelkova is proposed at 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share Provide interspersed ornamental trees on site, the north corner of the building and an similar characteristics. Such common elements allow for along Avon Street. additional Redbud is proposed nearby. Four more flexibility in the design of structures because Otto Luyken Laurel are proposed along the common landscape features will help to harmonize the Provide additional landscaping on site, outside wall, west of the compactor screen wall. The appearance of development as seen from the street upon of utilities, to help better integrate the building Redbuds, Zelkova and Laurel are expected to which the Corridor is centered. and its service areas into the corridor. help integrate the building into the surroundings. 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3'h inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right - of -way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: Show on the plan the existing shrubs along Mill a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior Creek Drive. roads. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet on center. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: Increase the size of the Zelkova trees to 21/2" The Zelkovas have been increased to 21/2" None. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior caliper minimum. caliper minimum at planting. pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 21/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet on center. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed throughout the interior of the parking area. b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 21/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height. 37 Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as None. The proposed species are acceptable. None. approved by the Staff based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D). 38 Plant health: The following note should be added to the None. The note appears on Sheet C8. None. landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated Revise the site plan to clearly show the location, The screening wall has been extended in Include a note on the site into the overall plan of development and shall, to the extent extent and material of the compactor screening length. It now encloses the ground- mounted plan indicating the height possible, be compatible with the building designs used on wall. Include a note on the plan stating that the mechanical units. A screening wall detail is and material (red brick to the site. compactor will not exceed the height of the screen wall. Include a screen wall detail in the included with the architectural drawings, and the detail includes a note stating that the match the building) of the compactor screen wall. 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these plan. compactor height will not exceed the screen features will still have a negative visual impact on the wall height. However, the note does not appear Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to Provide additional site sections and/or on the site plan. Screen wall height is 10'. The eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. perspective views (as viewed from Avon Street) wall is faced with the red brick that is proposed Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. to clarify the visibility of the compactor /service for the building. Above - ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed area. wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices. Show on the plan the existing landscaping A site section has been added from Avon Street through the building, showing the trash 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may located just north of the subject parcel that will compactor and the screen wall. The section consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. help screen views of the proposed building. shows that the wall will sufficiently screen the compactor. The perspective view that includes 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment Extend the screen wall as necessary to fully the compactor area has also been updated. from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." screen the service area from view. The applicant has stated that there will be no 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the Locate the ground- mounted mechanical units so rooftop equipment. front of long buildings as necessary to soften the they are screened by the brick screen wall. appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type of Four Otto Luyken Laurel have been proposed such trees or vegetation should be determined by the Show the locations and heights of the rooftop along the wall west of the compactor screen length, height, and blankness of such walls. equipment on the plans and elevations. Include wall and a Redbud and a Zelkova have been b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, a section to clarify that the equipment will not added in the vicinity. These plants, together and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and be visible from the EC. with the existing trees and shrubs along the structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Avon Street frontage (now shown on the plan) Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. Add landscaping on site to further mitigate the appearance of the north elevation. are expected to sufficiently mitigate the appearance of the north elevation. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows: a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. Site Grading 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site None. The abrupt change in elevation between the None. to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of retaining site and adjacent streets will be maintained walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, with this proposal. Visibility of the proposed rounded land forms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep retaining walls from the EC is expected to be cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed low. contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Appearance of the compactor /service area from the EC 2. Landscaping to mitigate the north elevation 3. The detailing of the walls and entrance features Staff recommends approval with the following condition: 1. Include a note on the site plan indicating the height and material (red brick to match the building) of the compactor screen wall. minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the None. No grading is shown within the dripline of None. drip line of any trees or other existing features designated for trees to remain. preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control plans. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the development of the site. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be None. The proposed development will tie into the None. designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need existing drainage system. for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Appearance of the compactor /service area from the EC 2. Landscaping to mitigate the north elevation 3. The detailing of the walls and entrance features Staff recommends approval with the following condition: 1. Include a note on the site plan indicating the height and material (red brick to match the building) of the compactor screen wall. TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date Cl Cover 5 -5 -2014 C2 Existing Conditions & ESC Phase 1 Plan 5 -5 -2014 C3 I Layout & Utility Plan 5 -5 -2014 C4 Grading & ESC Ph. 2 Plan 5 -5 -2014 C5 ESC Notes 5 -5 -2014 C6 ESC Details 5 -5 -2014 C7 Site Details 5 -5 -2014 C8 1 Landscape Plan 5 -5 -2014 L1 Lighting Plan 5 -5 -2014 L2 Lighting Details 5 -5 -2014 - Architectural Elevations — South and West - - Architectural Elevations — North and East - - Rendering from Avon St. & Mill Creek Dr. Intersection Looking East - - Rendering from Avon St. Looking South - - Rendering from Southside Shopping Center Entrance Looking North -West - - Site Sections Through Proposed Building — NW to SE, NE to SW - Site Sections Through Proposed Building SE to NW, Screen Wall Detail - - Existing Street View from Avon St. & Mill Creek Dr. Intersection Looking North -East - - Existing Street View from Avon St. Looking South -West - - Existing Building at Southside Shopping Center - - Material samples: Brick A: General Shale Full Range Red wirecut; Brick B: Watsontown Carleton Velour; Blue color sample: Sherwin Williams Cobalt Stone 1791 - 10 ATTACHMENT A Lrf2C;l1�ZA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 April 24, 2014 Bob Pingry 306 Goose Creek Road Fisherville, Va. 22939 RE: ARB- 2014 -39: Goodwill Thrift Store — South Side Shopping Center 077000000047A0 Dear Mr. Pingry: The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on April 21, 2014, took the following actions on the above noted petition: Regarding the Initial Site Plan: The ARB, by a vote of 3:0, forwarded the recommendations outlined in the staff report to the Agent for the Site Review Committee, as follows: Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines: As per § 32.4.2.2(b)(3) and 30.6.4(c)(2) and (3) and EC Guidelines #17 integrated into the development and visibility of service areas and equipment is not eliminated. Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None. Regarding recommended conditions of initial plan approval: o A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. and 18, service areas and equipment are not sufficiently o Provide additional landscaping on site, outside of utilities and easements, to help better integrate service areas and equipment into the corridor, and to eliminate visibility of service areas and equipment. Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: • Revise the plan to show accurate drip lines of all trees to remain. Maintain grading outside of the drip lines of trees to remain. • Revise the plan to show existing shrubs to remain along Avon Street and Mill Creek Drive. Regarding the preliminary design: The ARB offers the following comments on the preliminary proposal for ARB- 2014 -29 and ARB- 2014 -39: Goodwill Mill Creek for the applicant's next submittal: 1. Indicate on the drawings the material and color intended for the back of the pedimented entrance features. Choose a material and color that is integrated with the overall building. IF 2. Revise the site plan to show the entrance pavilion. 3. Confirm that the lighter color horizontal courses shown in the color renderings are a lighter color brick, as is seen in the existing shopping center. Identify the material and color on the drawings. 4. Adjust the brick detailing to eliminate the top -heavy appearance of the walls. 5. Provide on the plan details on the window glass indicating that visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40% and visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30 %. 6. Revise the maintenance factor (LLF) to 1.0 for all proposed light fixtures and recalculate the photometrics. Provide a point -by -point grid style photometric plan for review. 7. Provide cut sheets for the proposed light fixtures in the site plan. 8. Confirm that the proposed lamp type matches that which is currently used in the shopping center. 9. Identify the fixture and pole colors in the light schedule or with a note on the lighting plan. Bronze is recommended. 10. Include the standard lighting note on the plan. 11. Show on the plan the shrubs that exist along Avon and Mill Creek. Show the existing trees and shrubs that are to remain with accurate drip lines. 12. Move the new telephone and power lines outside of planting areas. 13. Provide interspersed ornamental trees on site, along Avon Street. 14. Provide additional landscaping on site, outside of utilities, to help better integrate the building and its service areas into the corridor. 15. Show on the plan the existing shrubs along Mill Creek Drive. 16. Increase the size of the Zelkova trees to 2'/2" caliper minimum. 17. Revise the site plan to clearly show the location, extent and material of the compactor screening wall. Include a note on the plan stating that the compactor will not exceed the height of the screen wall. Include a screen wall detail in the plan. 18. Provide additional site sections and /or perspective views (as viewed from Avon Street) to clarify the visibility of the compactor /service area. 19. Show on the plan the existing landscaping located just north of the subject parcel that will help screen views of the proposed building. 20. Extend the screen wall as necessary to fully screen the service area from view. 21. Locate the ground- mounted mechanical units so they are screened by the brick screen wall. 22. Add landscaping on site to further mitigate the appearance of the north elevation. 23. Show the locations and heights of the rooftop equipment on the plans and elevations. Include a section to clarify that the equipment will not be visible from the EC. 24. Revise the plan to show accurate drip lines for all existing trees and to show existing shrubs along Avon Street and Mill Creek Drive. Ensure that grading won't negatively impact existing trees to remain. 25. Integrate the entrance features into the detailing and design of the building itself. This would include the gable roof, the pediment intersection with the main building, and the correspondence of the columns with the glazing. Revised drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing. Please provide a memo including detailed responses indicating how each comment has been addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms, checklists and schedules are available on -line at www.albemarle.org /ARB. Please be certain that your ARB submittal addresses the above -noted issues. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner Cc: MTAP LLC, 2903 N. Augusta Street, Staunton, Va. 24401 Greenhalgh, Blakeley T Or Jennifer Parham Greenhalgh , 636 Park St, Charlottesville Va 22902 12