The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWPO201400032 Review Comments Stormwater Management Plan 2014-06-11�pF A vt�r�1Q COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Plan preparer: Owner or rep. Plan received date: Rev. 1 Rev. 2 Date of comments: Rev. 1 Rev. 2 Reviewer: Montessori Pantops Mountain Community School Chris Mantle, Chris Sonne; McKee Carson [301 East High Street, Charlottesville, VA 22902, cmantle(cmckeecarson.com; csonne(c)mckeecarson. com] Montessori Community School of Charlottesville [440 Pinnacle Place, Charlottesville VA 22911 wfisher (a)mountaintopmontessori.org] 16 April 2014 21 May 2014 3 June, 2014 05 May 2014 28 May 2014 11 June 2014 - Approved John Anderson A. Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan (WP0201400032) - Approved 1. Separate out the WPO plans. They cannot be approved as part of a site plan set. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. 2. These plans should include BMP /s for phase 1 that reflect ultimate build -out. With change to Master Plan and prior applications that eliminate certain features (bio- filters, cistern, swale), it is important that SWM design reflect overall development plans. May 1, we met to discuss need to retain semblance of biological treatment since bio- filters were incorporated (as exhibit drawings) in the 2009 special permit. Since bio - filters and a cistern were elements of prior design, please ensure that water quality requirements are met using proposed rain gardens, or another approach. Please furnish details that demonstrate that phase 1 SWM meets quality and quantity requirements. Compare pre- and post - development impervious areas; show that selected SWM BMP /s meet required (pollutant) removal rates. (Rev 1.) Comment has been addressed, yet design details require clarification. Total rain garden design volume appears sufficient to meet detention requirements, but significant post - developed storm runoff does not reach any rain garden. Hydrocad modeling shows that post - developed 2- and 10 -year peak runoff values are less than pre - developed, but the Short Version BMP Computations spreadsheet, which calculates volume for water quality purposes, assumes runoff from developed areas reaches SWM facilities. Only 3 of 9 defined drainage areas reach rain gardens. Sub -area 3 routes to Rain Garden RG -5; Sub -area 4 routes to Rain Garden RG -4; Sub -area 7 routes to Rain Gardens RG -1, RG -2 & RG -3. Please present calculations that show minimum removal efficiency of 33% is met with current Rain Garden and permeable paver subgrade storage design. Specifically, statement that "the project BMPs remove a total of 72.7 cubic yards of stormwater (at 100% efficiency), resulting in a total pollutant removal of 4.9 times the minimum required amount" may be misleading. For example, a 100% efficiency rate applied to half an affected area equates to 50% efficiency for the entire area. Please evaluate runoff from areas reaching rain gardens against runoff from impervious areas of the 1.26 Acre site. Restate removal efficiency as it relates to post - developed Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 impervious areas. Re- stated efficiency should include areas routed to rain gardens and impervious areas that simply discharge to existing inlets. Further, please note that statement of 100% efficiency presumes no overflow from any rain garden, yet unless Hydrocad Software predicts 100% detention during design year storms for DAs that route to the gardens (DA -3, 4, 7), then removal efficiency is <100 %. Please consider runoff areas that do not reach the rain gardens, and overflow, and re -state efficiency with respect to site impervious areas. Sheet 16: plan - profile views require a scale to aid review and construction. Label bottom of wall elevation for each wall shown in rain garden/sub -grade storage profile view. Show dimensions for RG -1, 2, 3, 4, and sub -grade SW storage (beneath permeable pavers; plan view). Furnish RG -5 details /dimensions, including connection with inlet B3. Please compare dimensions against table SWM treatment volumes (as a check). Confirm ponded volumes (cf) for RG -1, 2, 3 (as a check). (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. Also, see 6/11 e-mail, Chris Mantle — construct sediment trap (floor dimensions) plan sheet 3 scale: 1" = 20'. 3. Water Quantity: Please demonstrate compliance with AC Code 17 -314, Control of Peak Rate and Velocity of Runoff. (Rev. 1) Comment has been partially addressed. Please furnish 2- and 10 -yr design storm gpeak for rain gardens. Confirm that pre- and post - development 2- and 10 -yr design storm release rates shown on sheet 15 graphic reflect gpeak for the entire 1.26 Ac. site; that is, that the graph includes storm runoff that does not reach rain gardens but drains instead directly to the existing inlet near the intersection with Rolkin Drive. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. 4. Furnish profiles for new sanitary sewer and storm drain lines. Furnish pipe and inlet computations for existing lines or inlets that receive additional flow, including capacity and spread calculations for inlets on Rolkin Road that receive increased runoff with change from gravel to asphalt parking surface. Consider IN- A2 to MH -B 1, and discharge through this line. Ensure that discarded design profiles (IN -1 to IN -2 to MH- 3, for example) and labels (MH -3, OF -3, for example) are removed from sheet 7. Show plan/profile and furnish computational details for the parking lot rain garden island if this is a SWM structure. How will runoff reach the parking lot rain garden? Ensure that labels and notes on sheet 16 are readable scale (font pitch). (Rev. 1) Comment has been partially addressed. Response states that "stormwater pipe flow calculations and capacities have been added to the plans ... [and that] the resulting increase in spread at the inlet is shown on the attached chart." These items are missing; please provide. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. 5. 2014, Stormwater Narrative - Additional Stormwater Measures (sheet 15) relate to temporary ESC, not permanent SWM measures — revise /furnish Stormwater Narrative - Stormwater Measures for Phase 1. This is critical. (Rev. 1) Comment has been partially addressed. Revise statements concerning pollutant removal efficiency. Ref. item 2., above. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. 6. Restore Nvoplast Dome Grate detail —ref sheet 13, 3/31/14 plans. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. 7. Sheet 3, Note 8, please eliminate reference to "sediment which accumulates in the existing pond," a possible carryover from earlier design. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. B. Erosion Control Plan (WPO201400032) - Approved 1. Separate out the WPO plans. They cannot be approved as part of a site plan set. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. 2. Provide clear limits of disturbance, including areas near amphitheater and geodesic dome if these areas will be graded. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 3. Provide perimeter controls that include utility demolition and installation of new sanitary sewer line. The sediment trap is upslope of utility work and appears to release to a steep slope. There is potential for sediment trap discharge to wash across the sidewalk and onto Rolkin Road. Consider measures that limit this potential. Please clearly delineate sidewalks at Rolkin and Richmond Roads. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. 4. Furnish safety fence to prevent incidental trespass. None is shown. All controls must be shown and detailed on the plan, and within the limits of disturbance. (Rev 1) Comment partially addressed. Please show SAF immediately adjacent to sidewalks on Rolkin Drive and Richmond Road (Rte. 250). This SAF should remain up at all times except as needed to allow construction access. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. 5. Indicate access (vehicle travel path) to stockpile area, sheet 3. Stockpile area needs a construction entrance. Also, there is an apparent conflict between the construction entrance and storm drain line from IN-A2 to MH -B1 (sheet 5). (Rev. 1) Comment has been a(I ' -ssed. Minor relocate CE label to correspond with new CE location, sheet 03. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. 6. Furnish sediment trap details and dimensions (profile, perspective, cross section of outlet) sufficient to evaluate against VESCH; see Plate 3.13 -2 (VESCH) — ST floor length and width, especially. Rev. 1 Comment not addressed. Please furnish. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. Also, see 6/11 e -mail, Chris Mantle — construct sediment trap (floor dimensions) using plan sheet 3 scale: 1" = 20'. C. Road plans D. Site Plan (SDP201400032) Parking: Increase parking lot rain garden island radius from 1.8 -ft to 3 -ft, minimum. Lengthen curb (bulb -out) at parking lot entrance so that parking space at entrance is bordered by 18 -11 length of curb, minimum. Rev. 1 Comment has been addressed. E. Final Plat NA File: WPO201400032- Montessori - 061114 -REV2 �pF A vt�r�1Q COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Montessori Pantops Mountain Community School Plan preparer: Chris Mantle, Chris Sonne; McKee Carson [301 East High Street, Charlottesville, VA 22902, cmantle(cmckeecarson.com; csonne(c)mckeecarson. com] Owner or rep.: Montessori Community School of Charlottesville [440 Pinnacle Place, Charlottesville VA 22911 wfisher (a)mountaintopmontessori.org] Plan received date: 16 April 2014 Rev. 1 21 Maw Date of comments: 05 May 2014 Rev. 1 28 Maw Reviewer: John Anderson A. Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan (WP0201400032) 1. Separate out the WPO plans. They cannot be approved as part of a site plan set. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. 2. These plans should include BMP /s for phase 1 that reflect ultimate build -out. With change to Master Plan and prior applications that eliminate certain features (bio- filters, cistern, swale), it is important that SWM design reflect overall development plans. May 1, we met to discuss need to retain semblance of biological treatment since bio - filters were incorporated (as exhibit drawings) in the 2009 special permit. Since bio - filters and a cistern were elements of prior design, please ensure that water quality requirements are met using proposed rain gardens, or another approach. Please furnish details that demonstrate that phase 1 SWM meets quality and quantity requirements. Compare pre- and post - development impervious areas; show that selected SWM BMP /s meet required (pollutant) removal rates. (Rev 1.) Comment has been addressed, yet design details require clarification. Total rain garden design volume appears sufficient to meet detention requirements, but significant post - developed storm runoff does not reach any rain garden. Hydrocad modeling shows that post - developed 2- and 10 -year peak runoff values are less than pre - developed, but the Short Version BMP Computations spreadsheet, which calculates volume for water quality purposes, assumes runoff from developed areas reaches SWM facilities. Only 3 of 9 defined drainage areas reach rain gardens. Sub -area 3 routes to Rain Garden RG -5; Sub -area 4 routes to Rain Garden RG -4; Sub -area 7 routes to Rain Gardens RG -1, RG -2 & RG -3. Please present calculations that show minimum removal efficiency of 33% is met with current Rain Garden and permeable paver subgrade storage design. Specifically, statement that "the project BMPs remove a total of 72.7 cubic yards of stormwater (at 100% efficiency), resulting in a total pollutant removal of 4.9 times the minimum required amount" may be misleading. For example, a 100% efficiency rate applied to half an affected area equates to 50% efficiency for the entire area. Please evaluate runoff from areas reaching rain gardens against runoff from impervious areas of the 1.26 Acre site. Restate removal efficiency as it relates to post - developed impervious areas. Re- stated efficiency should include areas routed to rain gardens and impervious areas that simply discharge to existing inlets. Further, please note that statement of 100% efficiency presumes no overflow from any rain garden, yet unless Hydrocad Software predicts 100% detention during design year Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 storms for DAs that route to the gardens (DA -3, 4, 7), then removal efficiency is <100 %. Please consider runoff areas that do not reach the rain gardens, and overflow, and re -state efficiency with respect to site impervious areas. Sheet 16: plan - profile views require a scale to aid review and construction. Label bottom of wall elevation for each wall shown in rain garden/sub -grade storage profile view. Show dimensions for RG -1, 2, 3, 4, and sub -grade SW storage (beneath permeable pavers; plan view). Furnish RG -5 details /dimensions, including connection with inlet B3. Please compare dimensions against table SWM treatment volumes (as a check). Confirm ponded volumes (cf) for RG -1, 2, 3 (as a check). 3. Water Quantity: Please demonstrate compliance with AC Code 17 -314, Control of Peak Rate and Velocity of Runoff. (Rev. 1) Comment has been partially addressed. Please furnish 2- and 10 -yr design storm gpeak for rain gardens. Confirm that pre- and post - development 2- and 10 -yr design storm release rates shown on sheet 15 graphic reflect gpeak for the entire 1.26 Ac. site; that is, that the graph includes storm runoff that does not reach rain gardens but drains instead directly to the existing inlet near the intersection with Rolkin Drive. 4. Furnish profiles for new sanitary sewer and storm drain lines. Furnish pipe and inlet computations for existing lines or inlets that receive additional flow, including capacity and spread calculations for inlets on Rolkin Road that receive increased runoff with change from gravel to asphalt parking surface. Consider IN- A2 to MH -B1, and discharge through this line. Ensure that discarded design profiles (IN -1 to IN-2 to MH- 3, for example) and labels (MH -3, OF -3, for example) are removed from sheet 7. Show plan/profile and furnish computational details for the parking lot rain garden island if this is a SWM structure. How will runoff reach the parking lot rain garden? Ensure that labels and notes on sheet 16 are readable scale (font pitch). (Rev. 1) Comment has been partially addressed. Response states that "stormwater pipe flow calculations and capacities have been added to the plans ... [and that] the resulting increase in spread at the inlet is shown on the attached chart." These items are missing; please provide. 5. 2014, Stormwater Narrative Additional Stormwater Measures (sheet 15) relate to temporary ESC, not permanent SWM measures — reviseyurnish Stormwater Narrative - Stormwater Measures for Phase 1. This is critical. (Rev. 1) Comment has been partially addressed. Revise statements concerning pollutant removal efficiency. Ref. item 2., above. 6. Restore Nvoplast Dome Grate detail —ref sheet 13, 3/31/14 plans. 7. Sheet 3, Note 8, please eliminate reference to "sediment which accumulates in the existing pond," a possible carryover from earlier design. B. Erosion Control Plan (WPO201400032) 1. Separate out the WPO plans. They cannot be approved as part of a site plan set. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. 2. Provide clear limits of disturbance, including areas near amphitheater and geodesic dome if these areas will be graded. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. 3. Provide perimeter controls that include utility demolition and installation of new sanitary sewer line. The sediment trap is upslope of utility work and appears to release to a steep slope. There is potential for sediment trap discharge to wash across the sidewalk and onto Rolkin Road. Consider measures that limit this potential. Please clearly delineate sidewalks at Rolkin and Richmond Roads. (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. Furnish safety fence to prevent incidental trespass. None is shown. All controls must be shown and detailed on the plan, and within the limits of disturbance. (Rev 1) Comment partially addressed. Please Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 show SAF immediately adjacent to sidewalks on Rolkin Drive and Richmond Road (Rte. 250). This SAF should remain up at all times except as needed to allow construction access. 5. Indicate access (vehicle travel path) to stockpile area, sheet 3. Stockpile area needs a construction entrance. Also, there is an apparent conflict between the construction entrance and storm drain line from IN-A2 to MH -B1 (sheet 5). (Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed. Minor — relocate CE label to correspond with new CE location, sheet 03. 6. Furnish sediment trap details and dimensions (profile, perspective, cross section of outlet) sufficient to evaluate against VESCH; see Plate 3.13 -2 (VESCH) — ST floor length and width, especially. Rev. 1 Comment not addressed. Please furnish. C. Road plans NA D. Site Plan (SDP201400032) Parking: Increase parking lot rain garden island radius from 1.8 -ft to 3 -ft, minimum. Lengthen curb (bulb -out) at parking lot entrance so that parking space at entrance is bordered by 18 -ft length of curb, minimum. Rev. 1 Comment has been addressed. E. Final Plat NA File: WP0201400032- Montessori - 052814 -REV 1 � OF AL ,. vIRGI1`IZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Montessori Pantops Mountain Community School Plan preparer: Chris Mantle, Chris Sonne; McKee Carson [301 East High Street, Charlottesville, VA 22902, cmantle @mckeecarson.com; csonne @ mckeecarson.com] Owner or rep.: Montessori Community School of Charlottesville [440 Pinnacle Place, Charlottesville VA 22911 wfisher @mountaintopmontessori.orc] Plan received date: 16 April 2014 Date of comments: 05 May 2014 Reviewer: John Anderson A. Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan (WP0201400032) 1. Separate out the WPO plans. They cannot be approved as part of a site plan set. 2. These plans should include BMP /s for phase 1 that reflect ultimate build -out. With change to Master Plan and prior applications that eliminate certain features (bio- filters, cistern, swale), it is important that SWM design reflect overall development plans. May 1, we met to discuss need to retain semblance of biological treatment since bio- filters were incorporated (as exhibit drawings) in the 2009 special permit. Since bio- filters and a cistern were elements of prior design, please ensure that water quality requirements are met using proposed rain gardens, or another approach. Please furnish details that demonstrate that phase 1 SWM meets quality and quantity requirements. Compare pre- and post - development impervious areas; show that selected SWM BMP /s meet required (pollutant) removal rates. 3. Water Quantity: Please demonstrate compliance with AC Code 17 -314, Control of Peak Rate and Velocity of Runoff. 4. Furnish profiles for new sanitary sewer and storm drain lines. Furnish pipe and inlet computations for existing lines or inlets that receive additional flow, including capacity and spread calculations for inlets on Rolkin Road that receive increased runoff with change from gravel to asphalt parking surface. Consider IN -A2 to MH -B 1, and discharge through this line. Ensure that discarded design profiles (IN -1 to IN -2 to MH -3, for example) and labels (MH -3, OF -3, for example) are removed from sheet 7. Show plan /profile and furnish computational details for the parking lot rain garden island if this is a SWM structure. How will runoff reach the parking lot rain garden? Ensure that labels and notes on sheet 16 are readable scale (font pitch). 5. 2014, Stormwater Narrative - Additional Stormwater Measures (sheet 15) relate to temporary ESC, not permanent SWM measures — revise /furnish Stormwater Narrative - Stormwater Measures for Phase 1. This is critical. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 B. Erosion Control Plan (WPO201400032) 1. Separate out the WPO plans. They cannot be approved as part of a site plan set. 2. Provide clear limits of disturbance, including areas near amphitheater and geodesic dome if these areas will be graded. 3. Provide perimeter controls that include utility demolition and installation of new sanitary sewer line. The sediment trap is upslope of utility work and appears to release to a steep slope. There is potential for sediment trap discharge to wash across the sidewalk and onto Rolkin Road. Consider measures that limit this potential. Please clearly delineate sidewalks at Rolkin and Richmond Roads. 4. Furnish safety fence to prevent incidental trespass. None is shown. All controls must be shown and detailed on the plan, and within the limits of disturbance. 5. Indicate access (vehicle travel path) to stockpile area, sheet 3. Stockpile area needs a construction entrance. Also, there is an apparent conflict between the construction entrance and storm drain line from IN -A2 to MH -B 1 (sheet 5). 6. Furnish sediment trap details and dimensions (profile, perspective, cross section of outlet) sufficient to evaluate against VESCH; see Plate 3.13 -2 (VESCH) — ST floor length and width, especially. C. Road plans I`/_1 D. Site Plan (SDP201400032) Parking: Increase parking lot rain garden island radius from 1.8 -ft to 3 -ft, minimum. Lengthen curb (bulb - out) at parking lot entrance so that parking space at entrance is bordered by 18 -ft length of curb, minimum. E. Final Plat NA File: WPO201400032- Montessori - Memo - 050514 � OF AL ,. vIRGI1`IZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Montessori Pantops Mountain Community School Plan preparer: Chris Mantle, Chris Sonne; McKee Carson [301 East High Street, Charlottesville, VA 22902, cmantle @mckeecarson.com; csonne @ mckeecarson.com] Owner or rep.: Montessori Community School of Charlottesville [440 Pinnacle Place, Charlottesville VA 22911 wfisher @mountaintopmontessori.orc] Plan received date: 16 April 2014 Date of comments: 05 May 2014 Reviewer: John Anderson A. Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan (WP0201400032) 1. Separate out the WPO plans. They cannot be approved as part of a site plan set. 2. These plans should include BMP /s for phase 1 that reflect ultimate build -out. With change to Master Plan and prior applications that eliminate certain features (bio- filters, cistern, swale), it is important that SWM design reflect overall development plans. May 1, we met to discuss need to retain semblance of biological treatment since bio- filters were incorporated (as exhibit drawings) in the 2009 special permit. Since bio- filters and a cistern were elements of prior design, please ensure that water quality requirements are met using proposed rain gardens, or another approach. Please furnish details that demonstrate that phase 1 SWM meets quality and quantity requirements. Compare pre- and post - development impervious areas; show that selected SWM BMP /s meet required (pollutant) removal rates. 3. Water Quantity: Please demonstrate compliance with AC Code 17 -314, Control of Peak Rate and Velocity of Runoff. 4. Furnish profiles for new sanitary sewer and storm drain lines. Furnish pipe and inlet computations for existing lines or inlets that receive additional flow, including capacity and spread calculations for inlets on Rolkin Road that receive increased runoff with change from gravel to asphalt parking surface. Consider IN -A2 to MH -B 1, and discharge through this line. Ensure that discarded design profiles (IN -1 to IN -2 to MH -3, for example) and labels (MH -3, OF -3, for example) are removed from sheet 7. Show plan /profile and furnish computational details for the parking lot rain garden island if this is a SWM structure. How will runoff reach the parking lot rain garden? Ensure that labels and notes on sheet 16 are readable scale (font pitch). 5. 2014, Stormwater Narrative - Additional Stormwater Measures (sheet 15) relate to temporary ESC, not permanent SWM measures — revise /furnish Stormwater Narrative - Stormwater Measures for Phase 1. This is critical. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 B. Erosion Control Plan (WPO201400032) 1. Separate out the WPO plans. They cannot be approved as part of a site plan set. 2. Provide clear limits of disturbance, including areas near amphitheater and geodesic dome if these areas will be graded. 3. Provide perimeter controls that include utility demolition and installation of new sanitary sewer line. The sediment trap is upslope of utility work and appears to release to a steep slope. There is potential for sediment trap discharge to wash across the sidewalk and onto Rolkin Road. Consider measures that limit this potential. Please clearly delineate sidewalks at Rolkin and Richmond Roads. 4. Furnish safety fence to prevent incidental trespass. None is shown. All controls must be shown and detailed on the plan, and within the limits of disturbance. 5. Indicate access (vehicle travel path) to stockpile area, sheet 3. Stockpile area needs a construction entrance. Also, there is an apparent conflict between the construction entrance and storm drain line from IN -A2 to MH -B 1 (sheet 5). 6. Furnish sediment trap details and dimensions (profile, perspective, cross section of outlet) sufficient to evaluate against VESCH; see Plate 3.13 -2 (VESCH) — ST floor length and width, especially. C. Road plans I`/_1 D. Site Plan (SDP201400032) Parking: Increase parking lot rain garden island radius from 1.8 -ft to 3 -ft, minimum. Lengthen curb (bulb - out) at parking lot entrance so that parking space at entrance is bordered by 18 -ft length of curb, minimum. E. Final Plat NA File: WPO201400032- Montessori - Memo - 050514 Project Name: Montessori Pantops Mountain Community School WPO file number: WPO201400032 Stormwater Manaqement Plan Bond Estimate Item Item No. Unit Unit Cost Cost Number installed 1 Garden Walls (email, Robert Menasco [Martin Horn] /Kendra Guiffre; Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:47 PM) 51,345.00 2 Rain Garden, parking lot island (email, ref above) 5,900.00 3 biofilter soil mix (CY) 48 cy $38.00 $1,825.90 4 Gravel strip (email) 400.00 5 Plantings (email) 5,000.00 6 Rain garden pavers (email -2, Robert Menasco /Chris Mantle; September 11, 2014 11:32 AM) 5,885.00 7 Piping, rain garden (email -2, above) - assumes installation; appears conservative 9,000.00 cost sum $79,355.90 proj mgmt $11,903.39 contingency $9,125.93 9/24/14, JEA Total $100,390 9/24/2014