The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201400047 Review Comments No Submittal Type Selected 2014-08-29Phone 434 - 296 -5832 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Memorandum To: Scott Collins From: Christopher P. Perez, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: August 29, 2014 Subject: SDP - 201400047 Briarwood Commercial Gas Station — Final Site Plan Fax 434 - 972 -4126 The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] Conditions of Initial Plan Approval (from approval letter dated 6/4/14): 1. (1`42", 61 A, sit 'pIa i1 .i ,—€ 'i'1'IIv a I ic regi.1?'1'<omaefIi`.i 01 S'i I:I(?(I 32'L 6, 0f Chsl P 1:er . 18 f, 11 i.. ?iii'. J z & F� F x f t,1 a r� gx asr v i. x s sx�_ SS _ �v n .5 .sx s as ,. �,:�a v �'s e "'o 2. [32.5.3(a)] This application was reviewed against Site Development Plan requirements only. Any subdivision related comments are provided for reference only unless necessary for final site plan approval. Prior to final site plan approval the final subdivision plat and road plan serving the commercial lots shall be approved by the County, and the plat recorded in the Clerk's Office. The deed book page information of the recorded plat shall be provided on the final site plan. Final Rev 2: Comment acknowledged by applicant. Comment still valid as final sub plat and road plans still under review. 3. [32.5.2(n) & (i)] As proposed a portion of the private road is taking place on the adjacent residential parcel zoned PRD, specifically within the 30' vegetative buffer on the residential parcel and within the area of the 20' undisturbed buffer between the residential and commercial zonings. As you know the property owner was sited for violations of the above two areas by the Zoning Department for unauthorized disturbance of these areas. The applicant is currently working to remedy the site plan violation of the 30' vegetative buffer through a mitigation plan (SDP2013 -35). Prior to final site plan approval the mitigation plan must be approved by the County, to include ARB, Planning Staff, and Zoning staff. Final Rev 3: Comment acknowledged by applicant. Pending Sept 3rd BOS meeting, otherwise mitigation plan is approvable. Please submit a minimum of 4 copies of the mitigation plan for approval. Also, the applicant is attempting to remedy the disturbance of the 20' undisturbed buffer through a special exception as described in Section 21.7(c). The applicant intends to utilize the mitigation plan described above as an exhibit to take to the Board of Supervisors for review /approval. Prior to the special exception going to the Board of Supervisors the proposed plantings in the mitigation plan must be approved by ARB, Planning staff, and Zoning staff. Prior to final site plan approval the applicant shall receive approval of the mitigation plan, and receive the Board of Supervisors approval of the--special exception. If all the above have been satisfied then the plantings shall be provided on the final site plan's landscaping plan. 1 Final Rev 3: Comment acknowledged by applicant. Pending Sept 3,d BOS meeting, otherwise mitigation plan is approvable. Please submit a minimum of 4 copies of the mitigation plan for approval. AxW is co•erned xvith the =Tonr pinTOOL as the Monte to tlh':>" shv i-Jli' ' truirok: on th,' „ii. ovQ xppi'.',00,--a,1s, 'Nlouibly the ro'ad as cunvady depiaed Wes heavOly (}ti ME, Walls, lact" the ii pk e ,�lic,ant providing the r quired plani,ing's as de; Qribed (3n VoThathm WN be rcqWred Qn to Mal she Plan apProva! that the maink-ig walls can mstaN the re'-juired pla lO.J.1g', v rJght and WAt the plamings rool sysLons \-Y JJ not jeopardize It hAegrig of die walls, WE My U) "pual imd' by 4. w ",2(rul, iv IMe J' he ".'.in.al shepJan RV the gms Mon. AM •hAe to prime W "Okh k R) save the siit' to inc4l"It -the jx)aioil 'oftlo priv"Iie nod whkh amesses We 29. Tbis requiivi,neusis being [wedicaled by the Tb,� vhiciiicelicd on. the righ,- in- f ighi-ol.a to disj-)n-se- trall-ic, 1roln die she, F&W Ma to be Wnssed an ;pnkeun ann"11 is ro". -",-cqp,,i.ir&d :06r lfli'�"e i"he 1""'A'an' Pe, Musdow-, Nth VMT the rund pion .-h-e ng;hl" ii, nigha. m'34, Maq do nmd p0i depia,,,nu iibn o ".�roalnd fnanagenient Wility ne.,axidlo p(Mlion orde pdvateroad, W its 11saxesay dhcamdMvWhwd R) s at` e the gas sladcmi snul the swruiwnter fbiliq is- f-rorn Rle 29, the urrinywo, f"iCjlii'y shall lbe� ti €"reened !..)a, 317,9,7, Fhe mqai.r�"d sand scap o be pro %1z l tile J'a'-dkse"ip Plan of the fl'na,' site plan. F MA COMMenf, no 'ang'er vafidi as Ae Water hung se�'A to- the is, not iik g,,is st2u-ion Oil I e, 1"fic adjacent p.)j.veL mak aF die We, i, iabeiccl on th< she plan as B.. Parcel 'L 21ried 01; ho"Opq the MS and 13t''s .t ?i.. l�' -ecordled I'dats, 1his land as TN4F 032GOOR40004AT Qm) Sj),am Zone('] P'RD, R�'c'visc. 6. [32,' 5-M.,-Q 0-" �&" (ill Gelwral hjYmakla. As dhm6wd Wc a ponion of W lxi aW road i� talkhNg Phice on the adJ:Ict'nt resid mtial jx�ucei ]N,411 such simil he ON on Aw she J)hnl. 'll'iroug'hout t1he siw Plan n"Vise to hiclude 'fhe correct sit jac'Qat :a ,el ini�orfnatwn, such mkner inforn'tation. Na., uiap paxCeInrunbc"r, zoning P2MW'lx All will, -ncod. to be MGM as is Nat and be rxo"led pior to '11;pro al of 'the l"trull site pl"Fn' Finvi TRev 2: CO-Maanm'n�..tt chrug, plan. "n j32"'5'Nn)j TV nod serving the ske is pinismed to be Flx! apj)licant has Chosen to m ove fot'vvayrd 4vi.dh th' sijbdi.t' ision of cxxlunerc 01 lots and the roac", lfl.ali for appi o:Val of, the jxivate ro id una,. n'it'ers comay PHYMe Road Standw'ds Co Section The 1)rivata. ro*udl request will 11�')L:d lonoctfl),,., roquh-erne nts M'Section 14034,.A:J16,`r the. stibdivision au'd rt:!adl i'Aan ha 's bo�rj reviewrGap1mov,xi and =Wed Hit she p1mi. shall depict [he private nyst ommi the the final On planewa be ap(onvok (Pinivided all phi.n reli.ited reqi.iir har ,e been rn,,,n"). Wall lunt to he on -,md plan and jR not mquired 1br We Una! We rdax 9. 4—'12.1'17(�)(��111).ii Propose,] KWUMMMOM Two way Vehiclo aisles ane ivquired' to be 20F riGhnunh The jAaa proposc� 'occ�-"ss -�"Vays ofvarying widlths� such as 16' and IS". This rtoi adequaio. Rrybe to pnnidei'or 1-he reqiiired 20, inininutin fbi all two -,1a acees'«e.s' Pddresse& 10. .5au be SMIOW&/ ".4� )n 3"'?, 7. y a"ta'. eqjwkvbhe ;it�,Won A 6, Asswro Hie (hAnq)Acr I appivpriaw."I'v tip; final k'jt�; plan provido Me iii aWal tNed W W hdgM of Me encksure. L 11. ("'Kn Me plan depius a ifim,chal wva aQxxnt W the 6 pwthig. Wn"S Imning gieb .jklhlg' i0r-' Vii %{;' pl'al" laix"11 tfii`e: finprovca)enl' 12. [3,202(m)] Shut 1. gNicraj. notes". 'Jador r"'anining dierc is a Which 1ti:a"4`: at'? Ile pixmoyl. nctaining walls, J',he note s'hat] be revAdkemoved on Te final Are lion, rklvq the engincuhgdletails for the rwainmg Ws AW be pmaMej in cheifilal sj.tc' [)[aii, s: : -;'c. luni to be addmaed an rood dnn and is no', req poh-ed for 'flge tth'adl ske p n1i 13. [326.2N)l Proposed Dini.e[isioii th( still height mid svidth ol'th'c reti3inin'g reqa"Ijlccl Rm" C 14. 1a"52-",`-2 hiyunsvient %VNii kind lYiallh are the remhAng, vviflls? At'e they 'gx)g rite ? Provide on the phul. 15. 1,31, 5,2, (0" Pn,�poscd in�vroveine.nf. i0n the plan provide the Anits --of for th.c: l')rojx)saL to inc-fi xle !hc arc to txnn:itrljct and Me Private road" I& 1""gress' ETR'Y'E UJC"'ty bO pablk Mkis on, priank, d'eskple�-i' owl fial-11, b i - ii e a d d z°„ a via d 17. [32,�5x2 On)' A'(�'vosed lkrldicau the lx'igli.P of Me g"as c'anolly slructnr�' 'klso pro%id'u tho hoig'fit fh oft he, ga.s ytalkmi NEW, Does the yiie prol'x)"v to hove a jondiil'' jif:t ' „t 'o pn..,6de the locwion and dirnen.'sion (:Wffie [Qading sjxlc'e jjgj COnmentaddrase? ii,4-422 .`O"'k AL 311"A'-S] ph.".'w�q 2�Trij"; ')ill1ellsion the si-'Jiew"Oks and flh-" 1)1"i nthqs Planting reciidro d. toi be -i-ni'l-dialian. o"o, 6� in'. vi h, �,-" J,,,e s'ee"'� a spz",ci^"'f/ qf S',"perri'aors or d?e ph"ent-ing sn- ' reqw';-,;ine.ynx p, er 14-422F lWase smhnW ZA'c FhWd Raw 2j Tl""':e ap'pr'vrved -by •he PC. lint as COH4.lH ic"E'a *"aapp. 'wFd One sty-eeA'- is he jrpuu'slinc�"t ovmsidw A We jdandag .:se," Whq ns they ar", no Anpr- fi'n ti;Ne right o�F woky. and wvqahTd Via, he s0i'wwr' 8.8°K^ Ohn"?d s�J'c as the requhul •reei' 'c."uan-"aa lire 11'1'xcpx.,.od on� 4,1-.,mte,' '-%d"' right of way. The We Ed= wh=- thWiW e�29'VklxlMts At the NO phtt does are cwwdKnWd on A plan, Fhml Rev 3: Cominlent w1dressed, 19. m s k 1:�J-n'*in';' flrov-idc t e w.-Hit '. <ll i mility caw"'Tl>;'nt� inch�,dirqg ielej)hone� i,-nble, Qlectric and gas, Nnat 20. 1?1,x,,, V?,/hen, the %Wpe plaII is proAdi<,''t thn't me ,Aaldc of exiscIg a-nd pnropo ,-'d cisainei'It", or p€ ovidk'. proof of aulorizaIi-on fi'o'ra the holdct% 21. 132.R&H, :';fio%v Me WhAs on Me hmWape pNn to einum Out YaMAgs me n} OICCUJT'it).Z_"' ovcrtap ol"oasemw.nts or pipes, 22. site has x Small stal)d tr�s ssiyl howevQ-I'. noilc' ol, Mt.sc "'I"Ots F?`; ' dcpicted vm the eximing thcst-' trb, Ch on ems Ions dwa of tbe pk'in 1"" the are 'nn the phi !"n "'Itpic"F iii k. RUN WR: CownUIVA smidwsed. 21 P2A! (h) A N)d reg�'r�lin.v" As�sl.lre thal the prop("'.m-d sue OfAw Wding i� couni Omnshm aH dwets of Te We plan. As sheet 1. ""tfideI, gencral notob - Existin'(""' Pro- poscd U'C- and hnpervious Ama Wrthe bulfing Us 31W) SF bubding however. sheet. 3 for :<. bufldlhqg. 1z.40ch 4 !"700 SF. Revise, al 4 Corn nn em t "2"I'dh-1 21 PW (b) �4 (n) S, Kllja)� namky qfpviQg v•uccs. �Jh.00 1, ("k'neraj "Noics, under Par1kins as�"klxc the calcidalign iifilizes the �,orrea squar�, l'ootage of the N�Rdins- currcn'IN Ws limed as Q00) SF, rznuinegO o- d -Cs.<VL 21 pLU kW So QA. 0123(aN31 -WAka),� WL,xinnurn number qfjvw%,,, sjry,uces. ',,)heet L General N,'Aes.. (In der Parl,.'ing JRIAi�I])o'Sc(j th j'I si s '. m lids 27 - pa co ; hovv"'.wr the number <1 PWkKg IT= hi a pwkmg awa ffic° nmoil.)LI, of., �Pacos i,tqkaircd i,norc lhaii (20) percefa, 1his siic qppears 1,o be f;- -, I nax i I ' €'€ i.i n if , :,n n I tied, R:, i i.-se' 26, [3252(al 21,7] :S'efhi.i,;Iu, With the Ply;Xwed WiCklllillf (If' Brianvood Flive. the pipused gus itatkon bidIddy does mi appear to InQcl dw nownum 30 selack to a publjxL J,i'Jh't f Rcx iw appropriatoty, addressed, 27. thNnes. Frovidc �N- all paywed streets Wr app"wal Wn E91 1, 21. 131SIA'Al Chi the Be PQ punk& 11 Wgrani i"or Pkl�tl 1is inibrnmHon ivi 11 aid in nalf reziew cW daily operaWN cW be "-ile, RM01 D U C to 11 " g a "i ,sae i J. t "a co.----V -r.. w u t "a "'� > n ��p'Wll "i" cn b ikw, , 29. [12,3.' 3 <y Pkein'y' this site is locat(,%d in Me Fintrame. (,orridor froin the ArchiLeuiral Finall Comment W WE We ARIB -iP,"ev 30. j3L51(mq TWHI a nee staWbg Agn be an the pwpvV"" 111'so", hat w� the W•tkm of sm ti gm zk WPWaW SQ.). ill [IeLd to :thou, the locadon cIfffiesign on the SIe plan' EQ11 Conment nuidivssed, 31. f 52(n) &I Qj The lbllovsing will bereqniied f'(.)r final sit plan ap-,,prol,-fl: - Clutdoor li,,Jriinj; inRinnalkin inoluding a IWAoinvtric, plan and dcscripfion' and phcItoi . r'aph or 4 Waaam of e=h tymofouthwr Imp hurim !Sm, 317161 Sec.? 171110","' A yd ,n in NO Qan 32.7.91. Fin Ed ties W ljov in the Huai mt,:� vl1an. 3,,�,)ee revi"w"n', i" Comment k1dressed, 32. j-Z2',,' .91 shco (-,;. plani sch<wdujo, A.C'�` . .... . AjnalancAbi�'r x Grafidi(.bra �Scrvicvbcxry) ,k�pi <1 as 20" calyeq hmveven the plantcan<Ty No Alizes loigln of'6-7' mMe 6nw orphrnQ toquhl'y Rw dw 130 3F caimpy Acm Revisc aj4xwj3 1 aloly 33. Q711 Lamlycoping, 6 pl.niii scliz.,,diuk, CK - Qrviz.,. iRedbud) is dcqpicted �as '2.5-" caliper-, howo,,:er the appro%wd p1m COWTY Ust Ohmsheigin of so- afthe drne ol:'phuitiog to thc 1-2-1 approprjai,,Ay, bi CAMament WIJF;s 34. fam,,b(,apfirig. Sji et 61 j-,larrt- saimchda PY -- Prulius (Yo` biro Chcri3'1 is depicted as 2,5" cable. r Wkever, the approved plard'. Cam, Hq Uslizes heighi ol'6-7' at tht tim,�, (A"Pl-anhag to the 99 SF ewuTy wilc�. Revisc 35. [3=11 LwmAnWhW he-m i^ if pro' ,'Wed (ml sheet 3, Wich Maws- 2WI(HO ,Ass 1m. ": §e e sho'el 10 i plaw"Ing", "'. Were it IN a AW I () assochaed -with Me 11A sim, plan. flicnotc, applulsixely, Final QVQ: Cown n9 eat a Old yvss,,�,, 36. [3L711 Provide plan's landscape sheet W the-111,11 pit o Plan f(�r we gas flusBerl T`zge 9 8-had, be revised up match n-,�pqn-G-VablIC 12HdWM,PAg W" SDP2,01113-3,-Sx 'C,,,,mun-:-iv-s wete, pnwkkd b, be ads .Bea nt on the ruitigadon yAnn 1124-44 which call Wr substantial oviocation of the plantings due &I Ovininhig 'wall SWUM& 'requi.red, woxaelq,,a-, �,.,Xaff ree.ekvedl "Ibe Wevised. m0gsion plan Owl 8-7-14, 10 ara'AscopIg plan is dq:nCw6 the Finns she 3. 4.:onnnne,,in 37. 1317 AI st-ree Imidscaping ik!, ocasicle o"fl-he jflandng qtrip "Ind is to be befi,(nd flis ) sidcvak to Contain 0m, C plandi.ig. sh,,�� Al be planed on the Ilia! stAiliviskm pha hr be connnuchl As. The tasefficnis andl requiredii ovel Imes shall be showii on the finat site t,)lan# as th,e Tmc�s cannot, be ion dn„,,d on ihe, road plan be dwy am om olf"fli igfit oiwa-y. 2-x, pe -,,- -ts but ' he qm'l p-,Jhu doe%, nol. Asmiare these Rev 2. The she pDan shows the flamh "'q "a"'w',nen, e, )r.,4.s are owed an Mn_ Ans Mnid Notably, the Bring sub pNi 9mH be rmonkd p0ar to Me Hans she plan app p-avn-, 3% Conun,, eaa 'o'dih-ess"n 38. jSec. .322.7,R-,Y,, Ike. 071 Q00g, A liglhhnixrwie appears omysbeetA but ii dk)o. not inQlude the requirod vowding. A&I the siandard Hoving note to Me pi= launp ihat emps 1000 Or nnnv Whu" 7umena slip be ar :Ungol or �O r-esikxand Walax 6W, awa,""Innwi, The of OMO PuNk PWOS and,;w ➢ or is --:Oning -Uswi(,-�s sh"al", ` -h .1,� R, 39. [32AI Rw dw site AaU be punIded N) the NO miss plan, the appJ icant ivlhe� o11 d1oroad plan io providC requircd is J,),ot suffichmA(, Flic a ekc� be providcd, an AC And We PAL WIs 40. 11.4 avAd umnabon do Ne of be plan Aould be reviseal i.o as %nion- W PWn Hnpd' lzev 20,!. Coranmul addmased. 41. [Convalent' 11hroughout the plan dkeetimial vuiv%v,, are pmwidled throughomthe driv°, hov,�LVer, !,he f. rc hackwanl� flim,-e drivcrs drivirq.l, on be jcift We of do Ate), This is t,ery, dangerous, and i-nay 5 _.. :.: 3., 3 ., s.:ittiv�. .?i�,:>12�li�Ji €� <., .atFi'>ILEi€ �,��t, :ri. €�.;sa cs ��is: S,s.t,�, >rr.FZI,.:.F. ��..�# i ». i� ,,. ,n i i D \ s 7 3 42. �..,�; .......W ,: �3 �;t�( ,'" ,ii �,,1JJO,' .�£1f.�c: . €, € :y':. . €))i /l: }�£ %z 'i c:i t t /.� "q`�'� } }' fEs� €. €.3i..i• Ls.I j €/s T3'- >i..CSf 35 E {� f�, SFii �kls SSA, �t.0 % %.ii.� S�}r i fits "s'3�3 f }.�I3xi£ 11 €; '1?€ i€ y I." . iill`s:7 i? ,> i?ll £i be ei,? 1.. od to ? 1 % F 01i4 i.'3 Ulis F', y s .l't ,i , '' s "�(4 .'s ' i ., ,.? €.)" 43. S ,e.;�� «,., n ts; l L1w €, l.. � z s.2 .�)j', t , ([3 16z.I� 3 «. 11ii5 t`'Eiixit sift; ts'.i'i s iii: �p<'g€ ,.' re- f,i"i;nc -2, t'n -oi'., "'a)" hotild be Rs;'vl ,: R, , a,.. ,4> . ,,.. <',:r < «� 2 essed 44. [5.1.20] As discussed in the email dated July 16a' 2014 a Special Exception is required for the 100' setbacks for underground storage tanks to property lines. Chapter 18 Section 5.1.20, Supplemental Regulations 5.1.20(b)J No storage tanks and loading facilities shall be located closer than one hundred (100) feet from any lot line. ". The special exception request was received on 7 -28 -14 and is being processed. The Special Exception is required prior to approval of the final site plan as currently designed. Rev 3. Comment still relevant, pending results of Sept 3 SOS meeting. 45. [8.5.5.3] During the review of the final subdivision plat for the commercial lots (SUB2014 -120) it became apparent that a variation would be required to the Briarwood PRD application plan (ZMA2005 -09). The approved application plan does not depict a road in this location which goes through any portion of Briarwood PRD (specifically the open space TMP 32G- lB -2 -B). The Variation request was received on 8- 4-14 and is being processed. The Variation is required prior to approval of the final subdivision plat as currently designed. Rev 3. Comment still relevant, pending results of Sept 3 BOS meeting. NEW COMMENT 46. Landscaping — Page 7, the Gas Station Plant Schedule provides a total canopy of 9,085; however, when the canopy of the trees listed is added it comes out to 12,833. This appears to be a mathematical error. Revise accordingly. If when making this correction you choose to modem the amount /type of landscaping provided staff will need to re- review the landscape plan. 47. Landscaping — Page 7, the Gas Station Landscaping Calculations table lists there as 27 parking spaces; however, there are only 23 provided on the plan. Revise accordingly. If when making this correction you choose to modify the amount /type of landscaping provided staff will need to re- review the landscape plan. Building Inspections — Jay Schlothauer - No objections E911— Andrew Slack 1. Approved ARB — Margaret Maliszewski (8 -5 -14 comments) Approved as of 8 -13 -14 Engineering Comments — John Anderson No Objection dated 8 -26 -14 ACSA — Alex Morrison Approval pending — comment received 8 -27 -14 "It looks like RWSA has approved the changes with Collins. Adam with Collins should be dropping off the updated copies to us today or tomorrow for our final approval which will allow me to recommend approval on the other plans. I will advise as soon as we see the updated 6 plans for approval. " (If you have their written approval, please provide it to Planning) Fire and Rescue — Robbie Gilmer Comments pending (If you have their written approval, please provide it to Planning) VDOT— Troy Austin Comments attached dated 8 -26 -14 Please contact Christopher P. Perez in the Planning Division by using cperezQalbemarle. orb or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3443 for further information. 7 tr d$ JAKE 3 Fig 11, 111 ;< DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper V'irgima 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner August 27, 2014 Mr. Christopher Perez Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP -2014 -00047 Briarwood Gas Station —Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Perez: We have reviewed the final site plan for the Briarwood Gas Station dated 6/9114 as submitted by Collins Engineering and offer the following comments: I . The road plan for "Road A ", "Road B" and improvements to Briarwood Drive and Route 29 should be approved prior to approval of this site plan. 2. All previous review comments have been adequately addressed. 3. A Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office for all work to occur within dedicated right -of -way prior to commencement of such work. This includes the grading in the Route 29 right -of -way and the installation of the detention outfall located within the right -of -way. We have no objection to the approval of this site plan upon the approval of the road plan for improvements to Briarwood Drive and Route 29. If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me at (434) 422 -9782. Sincerely, f: Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING K� COMMONWEALTH of 'VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper Virginia 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner August 27, 2014 Mr. Christopher Perez Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 40I McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP - 2014 -00047 Briarwood Gas Station - FinaI Site Plan Dear Mr. Perez: We have reviewed the final site plan for the Briarwood Gas Station dated 6.'-'9::14 as submitted by Collins Engineering and offer the following comments: 1. The road plan for "Road A ", "Road B" and improvements to Briarwood Drive and Route 29 should be approved prior to approval of this site plan. 2. All previous review comments have been adequately addressed. 3. A Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office for all work to occur within dedicated right -of -way prior to commencement of such work. This includes the grading in the Route 29 right -of -way and the installation of the detention outfall located within the right -of -way. We have no objection to the approval of this site plan upon the approval of the road plan for improvements to Briarwood Drive and Route 29. If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me at (434) 422 -9782. Sincerely, Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Phone 434 - 296 -5832 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Memorandum To: Scott Collins From: Christopher P. Perez, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: August 8, 2014 Subject: SDP - 201400047 Briarwood Commercial Gas Station — Final Site Plan Fax 434 - 972 -4126 The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] Conditions of Initial Plan Approval (from approval letter dated 6/4/14): 1. [32.6] A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. Final Rev 2: See Final Plan comments below. Comment still valid. 2. [32.5.3(a)] This application was reviewed against Site Development Plan requirements only. Any subdivision related comments are provided for reference only unless necessary for final site plan approval. Prior to final site plan approval the final subdivision plat and road plan serving the commercial lots shall be approved by the County, and the plat recorded in the Clerk's Office. The deed book page information of the recorded plat shall be provided on the final site plan. Final Rev 2: Comment acknowledged by applicant. Comment still valid. [32.5.2(n) & (i)] As proposed a portion of the private road is taking place on the adjacent residential parcel zoned PRD, specifically within the 30' vegetative buffer on the residential parcel and within the area of the 20' undisturbed buffer between the residential and commercial zonings. As you know the property owner was sited for violations of the above two areas by the Zoning Department for unauthorized disturbance of these areas. The applicant is currently working to remedy the site plan violation of the 30' vegetative buffer through a mitigation plan (SDP2013 -35). Prior to final site plan approval the mitigation plan must be approved by the County, to include ARB, Planning Staff, and Zoning staff. Final Rev 2: Comment acknowledged by applicant. Comment still valid. Also, the applicant is attempting to remedy the disturbance of the 20' undisturbed buffer through a special exception as described in Section 21.7(c). The applicant intends to utilize the mitigation plan described above as an exhibit to take to the Board of Supervisors for review /approval. Prior to the special exception going to the Board of Supervisors the proposed plantings in the mitigation plan must be approved by ARB, Planning staff, and Zoning staff. Prior to final site plan approval the applicant shall receive approval of the mitigation plan, and receive the Board of Supervisors approval of the special exception. If all the above have been satisfied then the plantings shall be provided on the final site plan's landscaping plan. Final Rev 2: Comment acknowledged by applicant. Comment still valid. Staff is concerned with the current proposal, as the entrance to the site relies entirely on the above approvals. Notably the road as currently depicted relies heavily on retaining walls, staff is apprehensive about the applicant providing the required plantings as described above on these retaining walls. Verification will be required prior to final site plan approval that the retaining walls can sustain the required plantings weight and that the plantings root systems will not jeopardize the integrity of the walls. Final: Item to be addressed on road plan and by Engineering staff. 4. 132.7.2.1, 32.5.2(m), 32.5.2(n), 32.7.9.71 Vehicular Access to the Site. The final site plan for the gas station shall include the private road which is to serve the site, to include the right -in- right -out portion of the private road which accesses Rte 29. This requirement is being predicated by the TIA which relied on the right -in- right -out to disperse traffic from the site. Final: Item to be addressed on road plan and is not required for the final site plan. Per discussions with VDOT the road plan will dictate the right in right out. Also, the road plan depicts an above ground stormwater management facility near the right -in- right -out portion of the private road, which serves as the road's stormwater. Because the road is required to serve the gas station, and the stormwater facility is visible from Rte 29, the stormwater facility shall be screened per 32.7.9.7. The required landscape screening shall be provided on the landscape plan of the final site plan. Final: Comment no longer valid as the water being sent to the SWM facility is not from the gas station site. 5. 132.5.2(a) & (n)] General information. The adjacent parcel, north of the site, is labeled on the site plan as Tract B, TMP 32G Parcel 1, Zoned C -1; however, the GIS and previously recorded plats depict this land as TMP 032GO- 08- 00- OOOAO, Open Space, Zoned PRD. Revise. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 6. 132.5.2(a), (n) & (i)] General information. As discussed above a portion of the private road is taking place on the adjacent residential parcel TMP 032GO- 08- 00- OOOAO. As such this parcel shall be listed on the site plan. Throughout the site plan revise to include the correct adjacent parcel information, such as: owner information, tax map parcel number, and zoning. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 7. [32.5.2(i)] All proposed off site easements will need to be submitted as a plat and be recorded prior to approval of the final site plan. Final Rev 2: Comment being addressed through final subdivision plat. The plat shall be approved and recorded prior to approval of final site plan. 8. [32.5.2(n)] Proposed improvement. The road serving the site is proposed to be private. The applicant has chosen to move forward with the subdivision of commercial lots and the road plan for review/ approval of the private road that meets county Private Road Standards pursuant to Section 14 -412B. The private road request will need to meet the requirements of Section 14 -234. After the subdivision and road plan has been reviewed/approved and recorded the site plan shall depict the private road and then the final site plan can be approved (provided all other site plan related requirements have been met). Final: Item to be addressed on road plan and is not required for the final site plan. 9. [32.5.6(i), 4.12.17(c)(1)] Proposed improvement. Two way vehicle access aisles are required to be 20' minimum. The plan proposes access ways of varying widths, such as 16' and 18'. This is not adequate. Revise to provide for the required 20' minimum for all two way accesses. Final: Comment addressed. 10. 132.5.2(n), 4.12.19(c)] Screening. Dumpsters shall be screened as required by section 32.7.9 and, where applicable, section 30.6. Assure the dumpster is appropriately screened. On the final site plan provide the material used in the enclosure and the height of the enclosure. Final: Comment addressed. 2 11. [32.5.2(n)] Proposed improvement. On sheet 3, the plan depicts a thatched area adjacent to the 6 parking spaces fronting the building. On the site plan label this improvement. Final: Comment addressed. 12. [32.5.2(n)] Proposed improvement. Sheet 1, general notes, under retaining walls, there is a note which reads: "no retaining walls are proposed". The proposal utilizes retaining walls. The note shall be revised/removed on the final site plan. Also, the engineering details for the retaining walls shall be provided in the final site plan. Final: Item to be addressed on road plan and is not required for the final site plan. 13. [32.5.2(n)] Proposed improvement. Dimension the full height and width of the retaining walls required for construction. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 14. 132.5.2 (n)] Proposed improvement. What kind of walls are the retaining walls? Are they block/redi -rock walls, geogrid? Provide this information on the plan. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 15. 132.5.2 (n)] Proposed improvement. On the plan provide the limits of disturbance for the proposal, to include the area to construct these walls, and the private road. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 16. [32.5.2 (m) & (n), 4.12.17(b)] Proposed Egress. "Entrances to parking areas from public streets or private roads shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation standards... " VDOT approval shall be required. Final Rev 2: Comment still valid. 17. [32.5.2 (n)] Proposed improvement. Indicate the height of the gas canopy structure. Also provide the height the of the gas station building. Does the site propose to have a loading space? If so, provide the location and dimension of the loading space. Final: Comment addressed. 18. [32.5.2(m), 14- 422(D) & 32.7.9.51 Planting Strip. Dimension the sidewalks and the plantings strips. Planting strips are required to be a minimum of 6' in width. If the applicant wishes to seek a special exception by the Board of Supervisors for the planting strip requirements per 14 -422F please submit the request and appropriate documentation. Final Rev 2: The waiver was approved by the PC. Thus as condition of approval the required street landscaping is to be pushed outside of the planting strip and is to be behind the sidewalk, landscape easements to contain these plantings shall be platted on the final subdivision plat for the commercial lots, as they are no longer in the right of way. The easements and required street trees shall be shown on the final site plan, as the required trees cannot be bonded on the road plan be they are out of the right of way. The site plan shows these easements but the final plat does not. Assure these efforts are coordinated on all plans. 19. [32.5.2(1)] Existing and proposed utilities. Provide the location of any existing utilities and utility easements including telephone, cable, electric and gas. Final: Comment addressed. 20. [32.5.2(p)] Landscape plan. When the landscape plan is provided assure that the proposed plantings are outside of existing and proposed easements or provide proof of authorization from the easement holder. Final: Comment addressed. 3 21. [32.5.2(e)] Landscape plan. Show the utilities on the landscape plan to ensure that plantings are not occurring overtop of easements or pipes. Final: Comment addressed. 22. [32.5.2(e), 32.7.9.4(c)] Existing landscape features. The site has a small stand of existing trees onsite; however, none of these trees are depicted on the existing conditions sheet. Depict these trees on existing conditions sheet of the plan. If they are to be removed, on the plan depict this. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 23. [32.5.2 (b) & (n)] Information regarding proposed use. Assure that the proposed size of the building is correct throughout all sheets of the site plan. As sheet 1, under general notes, Existing/ Proposed Use and Impervious Area for the building lists 3,600 SF building; however, sheet 3 provides for a 50'x74' building, which is 3,700 SF. Revise. Final: Comment addressed. 24. 132.5.2 (b) & (n) & 4.12.2(a)(3), 4.12.4(a)] Maximum number of parking spaces. Sheet 1, General Notes, under Parking Required, assure the calculation utilizes the correct square footage of the building, currently it's listed as 3,600 SF. Final: Comment addressed. 25. 132.5.2 (b) & (n) & 4.12.2(a)(3), 4.12.4(a)] Maximum number of parking spaces. Sheet 1, General Notes, under Parking Proposed the plan lists 27 spaces; however, the number of parking spaces in a parking area may not exceed the number of spaces required more than twenty (20) percent. This site appears to be over the maximum permitted. Revise. Final: Comment addressed. 26. [32.5.2(a), 21.7] Setbacks. With the proposed widening of Briarwood Drive the proposed gas station building does not appear to meet the minimum 30' setback to a public right of way. Revise appropriately. Final: Comment addressed. 27. [32.5.2(i)] Street names. Provide street names for all proposed streets for approval from E911. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 28. [32.5.2(s)] Additional information. On the site plan provide a diagram for Fuel Truck Turning Movements. This information will aid in staff review of daily operations of the site. Final: Due to large aisle width comment no longer applicable. 29. [32.5.2(a)] Being this site is located in the Entrance Corridor (EC), approval from the Architectural Review Board (ARB) is required prior to final site plan approval. Final: Comment still valid. See ARB comments below. 30. [32.5.2(n)] Will a free standing sign be on the property? If so, show the location of the sign. A separate sign permit will need to be submitted, however, you will need to show the location of the sign on the site plan. Final: Comment addressed. 31. [32.5.2(n) & (p)] The following will be required for final site plan approval: - Outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location, description, and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire [Sec. 32.7.8 & Sec. 4.17] Final Rev 2: Comment addressed - A landscape plan in accordance with [Sec. 32.7.9]. Final Rev 2: mitigation plan (8 -7 -14) is approvable. Provide this revised doc in the final site plan. See comment #36 below. 4 32. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Sheet 6, plant schedule, AG — Amalanchier x Grandifora (Serviceberry) is depicted as 2.5" caliper; however, the approved plant canopy list utilizes height of 6 -7' at the time of planting to qualify for the 130 SF canopy calcs. Revise appropriately. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed 33. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Sheet 6, plant schedule, CC - Cercis Canadensis (Redbud) is depicted as 2.5" caliper; however, the approved plant canopy list utilizes height of 6 -7' at the time of planting to qualify the 124 SF canopy calcs. Revise appropriately. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed 34. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Sheet 6, plant schedule, PY — Prunus Yedoensis (Yoshino Cherry) is depicted as 2.5" caliper; however, the approved plant canopy list utilizes height of 6 -7' at the time of planting to qualify the 99 SF canopy calcs. Revise appropriately. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed 35. [32.7.9] Landscaping. There is a note provided on sheet 3, which states: "Existing 20' land use buffer see sheet 10 for mitigation planting... "; however, there is not a sheet 10 associated with the final site plan. Revise the note appropriately. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed 36. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Provide the approved mitigation plan's landscape sheet in the final site plan for the gas station. Final Rev 2. Page 9 shall be revised to match approvable landscaping of SDP2013 -35. Comments were provided to the applicant on the mitigation plan 7 -24 -14 which call for substantial relocation of the plantings due to retaining wall structural engineering required setbacks. Staff received the revised mitigation plan on 8 -7 -14, the landscaping is approvable. Assure the landscaping plan is depicted on the final site plan. Revise. 37. [32.7.9] Landscaping. If the required street landscaping is pushed outside of the planting strip and is to be behind the sidewalk, landscape easements to contain these plantings shall be platted on the final subdivision plat for the commercial lots. The easements and required street trees shall be shown on the final site plan, as the street trees cannot be bonded on the road plan be they are out of the right of way. Final Rev 2. The site plan shows the landscape easements but the final plat does not. Assure these efforts are coordinated on all plans and plats. Notably, the final sub plat shall be recorded prior to the final site plan approval. 38. [Sec. 32.7.8 & Sec. 4.17] Lighting. A lighting note appears on sheet 7, but it does not include the required wording. Add the standard lighting note to the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3, 000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one halffootcandle. " Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 39. [32.6] Grading. All grading for the site shall be provided on the final site plan. Currently the applicant relies on the road plan to provide the required information; however, this is not sufficient. The information must also be provided on the final site plan. Revise. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 40. [Comment] To avoid confusion the title of the plan should be revised to `Briarwood Gas Station — Final Site Plan SDP201400047 ". Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. 41. [Comment] Throughout the plan directional arrows are provided throughout the drive aisles; however, the arrows are backwards (have drivers driving on the left side of the aisle). This is very dangerous and may cause substantial confusion for patrons of the gas station. Revise. Final Rev 2: Comment addressed. NEW COMMENTS 42. [Comment] Sheet 5, in the Road Notes, Note: "Mandatory Inspection at the following phases are required 5 by an engineer to certify the construction of the roadway for final acceptance by Cumberland County. " If the notes required it should be revised to reflect this project, in this County. Appears to be a typographical error. 43. [Comment] Sheet 7, there is note at the top of the sheet: "See SDP2013 -35 for mitigation area... attached to this final site plan, see sheet 8." The page reference appears to be a typographical error, and should be revised. Currently sheet 9 is the mitigation plan. Revise. 44. [5.1.20] As discussed in the email dated July 16`h 2014 a Special Exception is required for the 100' setbacks for underground storage tanks to property lines. Chapter 18 Section 5.1.20, Supplemental Regulations 5.1.20(b)J No storage tanks and loading facilities shall be located closer than one hundred (100) feet from any lot line. ". The special exception request was received on 7 -28 -14 and is being processed. The Special Exception is required prior to approval of the final site plan as currently designed. 45. [8.5.5.3] During the review of the final subdivision plat for the commercial lots (SUB2014 -120) it became apparent that a variation would be required to the Briarwood PRD application plan (ZMA2005 -09). The approved application plan does not depict a road in this location which goes through any portion of Briarwood PRD (specifically the open space TMP 32G- 1B -2 -B). The Variation request was received on 8- 4-14 and is being processed. The Variation is required prior to approval of the final subdivision plat as currently designed. Building Inspections — Jay Schlothauer - No objections E911— Andrew Slack 1. Approved ARB — Margaret Maliszewski (8 -5 -14 comments) 1. Some landscaping shown on this version of the site plan is not consistent with landscaping approved for the ARB. Please revise the plan for consistency with the ARB plans. Engineering Comments — John Anderson See Countyview for Engineering's comments. ACSA — Alex Morrison Comments pending Fire and Rescue — Robbie Gilmer Comments pending VDOT— Troy Austin Comments pending. Please contact Christopher P. Perez in the Planning Division by using cperezkalbemarle.org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3443 for further information. 0 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 12:36 PM To: 'Scott Collins'; 'adam @collins - engineering.com'; 'Graham Murray' Cc: John Anderson; Margaret Maliszewski Subject: SDP2014 -47 Briarwood Commerical Lot Gas Station - final site plan Scott /Adam/Graham, SDP2014 -47 Briarwood Commerical Lot Gas Station - final site plan On September 19th we received copies of the revised final site plan to depict the new /modified retaining wall designs and other minor items previously discussed. Staff sent this plan set out to three (3) reviewers: ARB, Engineering, and Planning. I offer the following, which are also available in Countyview. Please assure the plan is revised to address the remaining comments. Per discussions with Engineering if the plans are revised as requested we don't need to re- review them, just assure they are provided on the signature copies. (If you want to send PDF copies with the revisions for final review, we can take a quick look at them fairly quick). If you have any questions, give me a call. I offer the following comments: ARB — had no objections Engineering provided the following comments which need to be addressed. 1. Provide additional detail with proposed revised retaining wall design (9/17/14): provide Wall 1 and 2 cross - section view that shows Wall 1 and 2 relative to one another. —ref sheet 4 of 8, 7/18/14 M. Circeo design, shown as panel, plan sheet 17, 8- Aug /27 -Aug -14 road plans. 2. Arrange revised retaining wall design as shown on prior plans, with requested item #1 appearing on sheet 17, and with Wall 1 and 2 profiles appearing as side -by -side panels on sheet 18. 3. Geotechnical sheets 4, 5, and 7 show 4 -ft tall handrail at Wall 1 and 3. Geotechnical sheet 3 furnishes 2 details: handrail/fence post detail; sleeve -it fence post detail. Handrail detail is consistent with safety handrail. Specify proposed location for sleeve -it fence post detail —if this detail is not required for safety handrail (Wall 1 and 3), please delete this detail. If two details are offered as equivalent options, select detail to be used; eliminate detail not used. 4. Revise sheet 5 wall section views to show 4' handrail set behind wall, not in top course of block. Handrail set in top course of block is consistent with Redi -rock wall system, not proposed system (Anchor diamond pro unit). Planning provided the following comment which needs to be addressed. 1. [32.5.2(a)] General information. On the cover sheet of the site plan assure that all waivers, variations, and special exceptions are provided. Please add the following statements to the plan as they are all the items which have been approved, some with conditions. "Variation approved with this proiect at the July 29, 2014 Planning Commission meeting under SUB2014 -120 1) Variation to the planting strip requirements, from six (6) feet to three (3) feet width and allow the planting strip to be located on the back side of the sidewalk, in accordance with 14- 422(F) of the Subdivision Ordinance. Approved with a condition "The required street trees will be provided behind the sidewalks in landscaping easements to be recorded on a plat and depicted on the final site plan. " Special Exceptions and Variation approved with this proiect at the September 3, 2014 BOS meeting under SUB2014 -120 and SDP2014 -47 1) Buffer Zone Disturbance Waiver Section 21.7(c) — to disturb the 20 foot buffer zone adjacent to residential districts to facilitate construction of Boulderview Road and Elm Tree Court. Portions of each street are to be located within the 20 foot buffer, as well as grading and landscaping associated with a landscape mitigation plan to remedy a site plan violation on the property. With a condition of approval that: "Landscaping shall be installed as depicted on SDP2013 -35 Landscape Mitigation Plan which provides plantings between the proposed road and Briarwood property line. " 2) Variation to Briarwood PRD application plan (ZMA2005 -09) — A variation to Briarwood's application plan was approved to construct Elm Tree Court on a portion of open space associated with the Briarwood PRD. With a condition of approval that: "Landscaping shall be installed as depicted on SDP2013 -35 Landscape Mitigation Plan which provides plantings between the proposed road and Briarwood property line. " 3) Setbacks for Fuel Storage Tank Waiver Section 5.1.20(b) — to locate the gas station's underground storage tanks and loading facilities closer than the required 100' from any property line provided they meet the requirements of Section 5.1.20(a), which is a 3 foot setback." Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 pP A COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 9724126 Project: Briarwood –Gas Station Plan Plan preparer: Scott Collins; Collins Engineering [200 Garrett St., Suite K, Charlottesville, VA 22902, scottla.collins -en ing eerieg coml Owner or rep.: Wendell Wood and Nena Harrell [ulcwww @embargmail.com] Woodbriar Associates [P. O. Box 5548, Charlottesville, VA 22905] Plan received date: 11 June 2014 (Rev. 1): 24 July 2014 (Rev. 2): 11 August 2014 Date of comments: 14 July, 2014 (Rev. 1): 4 August 2014; 5 August 2014 (New/ items 2 -6) (Rev. 2): 26 August 2014 Reviewer: John Anderson RE: Final Site Plans (SDP201400047) The landscaping within the 30' vegetation buffer and 20' land use buffer shall match SDP201300035 (Amendment 43/SDP200600041), SUB201400066 (Road Plan), WPO201300072 (Road Plan WPO), and WPO201400030 (Underground storage amendment). (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. Applicant confirms landscaping matches across multiple plan sheets. 18- 4.12.13.a. – "Loading spaces shall be provided on the same lot with the use to which it is appurtenant and shall be adjacent to the structure it serves." Loading spaces are not adjacent to the gas station; recommend the two loading spaces be positioned more nearly adjacent to the gas station. (Rev. 1) Comment response: "Loading spaces cannot be relocated due to site layout " 18- 5.1.20.a. – "The sale or storage of the petroleum products shall satisfy the requirements established by the fire prevention code ofthe National Board of Fire Underwriters and the latest edition of the "Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, NEPA 30" of the National Fire Prevention Association." From NFPA, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2003 Edition, 4.3.3.2.2, this excerpt: [link: https:H law .resource.org /pub /us /cfr/ibr /004 /nfpa.30.2003.p ] 41131.8 Undeigmnd waia ahxll he cowered w16 out Iw 6an W mm l24 in,} Qf -nh. w will) nut ku iLxn 900 tun i if in -) of carrh an top of which ehall he plartd . slnh of rrmfnrcrd concmt Pat Irw then I(81 mm o4 m.I thh.- -L Whrn the. )ankh arr.. or orr Il krly u) br. viid etrd rri trxllic. chev 4 odl be prdncwd ugium datn4g, )tam w 1-kk* limmug nw• t Ihcu. try µt leax 900 mm (96 in.) of 04111 ccwrt, ur 4W uuu (14 in.) at—N- tamped nwth plus r11hry 150 mm (A in ) f"lnfnn rA rnmrrm, or 210 mm (p In.s 4 x phAluc rnnemfP. When aw I)ltxllic of Meiuforcrtl cQlwlvte Ixwnllt 6 uacd as pan of aw prntertion, it shall'tired M Inal SOU mat f 12 in) Avtirwr TAIV hryond ht, m 4;_ nl thr tack In xp dlrortlnm. While design site features relating to placement of gasoline storage tanks, spill containment, vents, etc, may be uncertain, please ensure depth of cover requirements. Confirm that concrete pad detail, sheet 5, ties to area labeled gas pumps, sheet 4. If so, reference this detail (7" concrete, 4" #21 -A stone base) on sheet 4. Identify approximate location ofunderground gasoline/kerosene storage tanks to show that 7" thick slab extends at least 12" horizontally beyond the tank outline in all directions. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 4. Briarwood Commercial Development TIA by Davenport (Project # 13 -338, 11/20/13, rev. 3/7/14) shows 24 -hr two -way volume trip generation for convenience market with gasoline pumps with 16 vehicle fueling positions as 8682. Sheet 5 displays this data using a double -end arrow and label: "4,341 VPD ". Revise label to clarify that 8,682 VPD is the TIA 2 -way estimate. The figure 4,341 VPD may be mistaken as a total 2 -way estimate, which it is not. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 5. Note: ground cover hardier than turf grass is required for slopes steeper than 3:1. [ACDSM- 8.A.2] (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 6. Sheet 4— Identify storm inlet structure with table value, T, spread at curb (ft) listed = 15.83. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 7. Sheet 4 — Revise proposed fence near townhouse lot lines to match proposed length of 5' wooden fence shown on road plans (SUB201400066); on road plans, this fence extends farther south. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 8. Sheet 3 — Provide capacity /spread calculations and VDOT type inlet located between the two Filterra units proposed for the NE corner of the parking lot. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 9. 18- 5.1.20.b. — "No storage tanks and loading facilities shall be located closer than one hundred (100) feet from any lot line." Show that underground gasoline storage tanks are at least 100 -ft from lot lines. [Also, #3, above] (Rev. 1) Comment acknowledged. 10. Famish drainage easements for storm drain pipes serving Road `A.' (Rev. 1) Comment addressed; Additional private storm drain easement within VDOT right -of -way discussed with Mr. Graham Murray (Collins), 31- Jul -14; plans to be revised to show private easement. New (Rev. 2) Comments below addressed: 1. REF SUB201400066 plan review comments. #6, 4- Au2-14: Discussed each item with Scott Collins, Jul -31, or Adam Long, Aug -l. With submittal of Redi -rock Retaining Wall design on 7/21 (d. 7/14/14): i) revise handrail details, sheet 6, consistent with railing location in top course of Redi -rock wall; it) landscaping between Walls 1 and 2 should prevent trespass between walls: no objection if eliminate lower wall (Wall 2) handrail if required to meet ARB /other departmental requirements; iii) restore backslope grade shown in Wall 3 profile views (D,E,F,G,H,I) of earlier submittal (Geoteclmical design engineer, M. Circeo, maintains drainage swale unnecessary); iv) revise proposed tree locations, Wall 3, to ensure minimum setback — requirement /formula outlined in Item #3, 7/23/14 correspondence, Margaret Maliszewski, ACCD, to Miller Cupp Associates Architects, P.C. / Collins Engineering; and, v) transfer all information from Circeo design titled Redirock Retaining Walls, Briamood Commercial, Albemarle County, Virginia, to final site plan (2 -3 new sheets). Transfer without revision, addition, or deletion, except by or through Michael R. Circeo. 2. Please revise wall profiles (sheet 6): show embedded wall depth. Please note elevation of base of each wall relative to inclined slope at base of each wall (7 -18; retaining wall design). 3. Soil tests to verify suitability of on -site material used as reinforced fill (Note 14, sheet 2, retaining wall design), and soil tests or reports for import material used as reinforced fill are required. Add notes to this effect. 4. A civil- geotechnical or structural engineer's report certifying construction in conformance with design is required. Please add note. 5. Monitoring during construction and testing by a qualified specialist (engineer- technician) will be required. Please add note. 6. Bearing capacity tests for wall foundations will be required (Walls 1,2,3). Please add note. File: SDP201400047- briamood -FSP- 082614 -rev2 �pF A vt�r�1Q COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Briarwood — Gas Station Plan Plan preparer: Scott Collins; Collins Engineering [200 Garrett St., Suite K, Charlottesville, VA 22902, scott(abcollins -en in�g com] Owner or rep.: Wendell Wood and Nena Harrell [ulcwww @embargmail.com] Woodbriar Associates [P. O. Box 5548, Charlottesville, VA 22905] Plan received date: 11 June 2014 (Rev. 1): 24 July 2014 Date of comments: 14 July, 2014 (Rev. 1): 4 August 2014; 5 August 2014 (New/ items 2 -6) Reviewer: John Anderson RE: Final Site Plans (SDP201400047) 1. The landscaping within the 30' vegetation buffer and 20' land use buffer shall match SDP201300035 (Amendment #3/SDP200600041), SUB201400066 (Road Plan), WP0201300072 (Road Plan WPO), and WP0201400030 (Underground storage amendment). (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. Applicant confirms landscaping matches across multiple plan sheets. 2. 18- 4.12.13.a. — "Loading spaces shall be provided on the same lot with the use to which it is appurtenant and shall be adjacent to the structure it serves." Loading spaces are not adjacent to the gas station; recommend the two loading spaces be positioned more nearly adjacent to the gas station. (Rev. 1) Comment response: "Loading spaces cannot be relocated due to site layout." 3. 18- 5.1.20.a. — "The sale or storage of the petroleum products shall satisfy the requirements established by the fire prevention code of the National Board of Fire Underwriters and the latest edition of the "Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, NEPA 30" of the National Fire Prevention Association." From NFPA, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2003 Edition, 4.3.3.2.2, this excerpt: [link: https :Hlaw.resource.org/pub /us /cfr/ibr /004 /nfpa.30.2003.pdf ] 4.3.3.2.2 Vndergraurid ranks shall be covered wirh not less than 600 mm (24 in.) of earth, or with not less than 300 mm (12 in.) of earth on top cd' which shall he, pl. occl a slab (if reinforced concrete not less than 100 mm (4 in.) thick. Where the ranks are, or are li kcly to he, subjected to traffic, ncc}' shall be protected against damage from vehicles passing over them blr at least 900 mm (36 in.) of earth cover, or 450 mm (18 in.) of well•tamped earth plus either 150 mm (6 in.) of reinforced concrete or 200 mm (8 in.) of asphaltic concrete_ When as- phaltic or reinforced concrete paving is used as parr of the protection, it shall extend at least 300 mm (12 in.) horizon- tally beyond the outline of the tank in all. direr do ns. While design site features relating to placement of gasoline storage tanks, spill containment, vents, etc, may be uncertain, please ensure depth of cover requirements. Confirm that concrete pad detail, sheet 5, ties to area labeled gas pumps, sheet 4. If so, reference this detail (7" concrete, 4" #21 -A stone base) on sheet 4. Identify approximate location of underground gasoline /kerosene storage tanks to show that 7" thick slab extends at least 12" horizontally beyond the tank outline in all directions. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. Briarwood Commercial Development TIA by Davenport (Project # 13 -338, 11/20/13, rev. 3/7/14) shows 24 -hr two -way volume trip generation for convenience market with gasoline pumps with 16 vehicle fueling Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 positions as 8682. Sheet 5 displays this data using a double -end arrow and label: "4,341 VPD ". Revise label to clarify that 8,682 VPD is the TIA 2 -way estimate. The figure 4,341 VPD may be mistaken as a total 2 -way estimate, which it is not. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 5. Note: ground cover hardier than turf grass is required for slopes steeper than 3:1. [ACDSM- 8.A.2] (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 6. Sheet 4 — Identify storm inlet structure with table value, T, spread at curb (ft) listed = 15.83. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 7. Sheet 4 — Revise proposed fence near townhouse lot lines to match proposed length of 5' wooden fence shown on road plans (SUB201400066); on road plans, this fence extends farther south. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 8. Sheet 3 — Provide capacity /spread calculations and VDOT type inlet located between the two Filterra units proposed for the NE corner of the parking lot. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 9. 18- 5.1.20.b. — "No storage tanks and loading facilities shall be located closer than one hundred (100) feet from any lot line." Show that underground gasoline storage tanks are at least 100 -ft from lot lines. [Also, #3, above] (Rev. 1) Comment acknowledged. 10. Furnish drainage easements for storm drain pipes serving Road `A.' (Rev. 1) Comment addressed; Additional private storm drain easement within VDOT right -of -way discussed with Mr. Graham Murray (Collins), 31-Jul -14; plans to be revised to show private easement. New 1. REF SUB201400066 plan review comments, #6, 4- Aug -14: Discussed each item with Scott Collins, Jul -31, or Adam Long, Aug -1. With submittal of Redi -rock Retaining Wall design on 7/21 (d. 7/14/14): i) revise handrail details, sheet 6, consistent with railing location in top course of Redi -rock wall; ii) landscaping between Walls 1 and 2 should prevent trespass between walls: no objection if eliminate lower wall (Wall 2) handrail if required to meet ARB /other departmental requirements; iii) restore backslope grade shown in Wall 3 profile views (D,E,F,G,H,I) of earlier submittal ( Geotechnical design engineer, M. Circeo, maintains drainage swale unnecessary); iv) revise proposed tree locations, Wall 3, to ensure minimum setback — requirement/formula outlined in Item #3, 7/23/14 correspondence, Margaret Maliszewski, ACED, to Miller Cupp Associates Architects, P.C. / Collins Engineering; and, v) transfer all information from Circeo design titled Redirock Retaining Walls, Briarwood Commercial, Albemarle County, Virginia, to final site plan (2 -3 new sheets). Transfer without revision, addition, or deletion, except by or through Michael R. Circeo. 2. Please revise wall profiles (sheet 6): show embedded wall depth. Please note elevation of base of each wall relative to inclined slope at base of each wall (7 -18; retaining wall design). 3. Soil tests to verify suitability of on -site material used as reinforced fill (Note 14, sheet 2, retaining wall design), and soil tests or reports for import material used as reinforced fill are required. Add notes to this effect. 4. A civil - geotechnical or structural engineer's report certifying construction in conformance with design is required. Please add note. 5. Monitoring during construction and testing by a qualified specialist (engineer - technician) will be required. Please add note. 6. Bearing capacity tests for wall foundations will be required (Walls 1,2,3). Please add note. File: SDP201400047- briarwood -FSP- 080514 -revl R` � ♦ �r C COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner July 16, 2014 Mr. Christopher Perez Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP - 2014 -00047 Briarwood Gas Station — Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Perez: We have reviewed the final site plan for the Briarwood Gas Station dated 619114 as submitted by Collins Engineering and offer the following comments: 1. The road plan for "Road A ", "Road B" and improvements to Briarwood Drive and Route 29 should be approved prior to approval of this site plan. 2. The impact of the outfall from the underground detention on the Route 29 drainage needs to be evaluated and provided for review. Potential erosion and capacity impacts will need to be provided. 3. Road "A" should be designed to VDOT standards per County requirements. As such, the proposed entrances should be modified as described below: a. The maximum width of each entrance should be 40'. b. The minimum sight distance should be 280' as 25 mph is likely to be the posted speed limit of Road "A" if it were a public road. If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING �pF A vt�r�1Q COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Briarwood — Gas Station Plan Plan preparer: Scott Collins; Collins Engineering [200 Garrett St., Suite K, Charlottesville, VA 22902, scott(&collins -en ing eering com] Owner or rep.: Wendell Wood and Nena Harrell [ulcwww @embarqmail.com] Woodbriar Associates [P. O. Box 5548, Charlottesville, VA 22905] Plan received date: 11 June 2014 Date of comments: 14 July, 2014 Reviewer: John Anderson RE: Final Site Plans (SDP201400047) 1. The landscaping within the 30' vegetation buffer and 20' land use buffer shall match SDP201300035 (Amendment #3/SDP200600041), SUB201400066 (Road Plan), WP0201300072 (Road Plan WPO), and WP0201400030 (Underground storage amendment). 2. 18- 4.12.13.a. — "Loading spaces shall be provided on the same lot with the use to which it is appurtenant and shall be adjacent to the structure it serves." Loading spaces are not adjacent to the gas station; recommend the two loading spaces be positioned more nearly adjacent to the gas station. 3. 18- 5.1.20.a. — "The sale or storage of the petroleum products shall satisfy the requirements established by the fire prevention code of the National Board of Fire Underwriters and the latest edition of the "Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, NEPA 30" of the National Fire Prevention Association." From NFPA, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2003 Edition, 4.3.3.2.2, this excerpt: [link: https: / /Iaw.resource.org /pub /us /cfr/ibr /004 /nfpa.30.2003.pdf ] 4.3.3.2.2 Underground ranks sliall be covered with not less than NO mm (24 in.) of carth, or with not less than 300 mm (12 in.) of earth on top A' which Shall he p4.oc4 a Slah of reinfor ced concrete not less than 100 mm (4 in.) thick. Where the tanks are, or are li kcly to he, subjwf -kd to traffic, thcy shall he protected against darnage from vehi cles passing over Chem by at least 4300 mrn (36 in.) of carth cover, or 450 mm (18 tin,) of we 11-tamped earth plus either 150 mm 0 in.) of reinforced concrete or 200 mm (8 in.) of asphaltic concrete_ When as- phaltic or reinforced concrete paving is used as part of the protection, it shWI cxtcnd st lr_ast 300 mm (12 in.) horizon- tally beyond the outline of the tank in all directions. While design site features relating to placement of gasoline storage tanks, spill containment, vents, etc, may be uncertain, please ensure depth of cover requirements. Confirm that concrete pad detail, sheet 5, ties to area labeled gas pumps, sheet 4. If so, reference this detail (7" concrete, 4" #21 -A stone base) on sheet 4. Identify approximate location of underground gasoline/kerosene storage tanks to show that 7" thick slab extends at least 12" horizontally beyond the tank outline in all directions. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 4. Briarwood Commercial Development TIA by Davenport (Project # 13 -338, 11/20/13, rev. 3/7/14) shows 24 -hr two -way volume trip generation for convenience market with gasoline pumps with 16 vehicle fueling positions as 8682. Sheet 5 displays this data using a double -end arrow and label: "4,341 VPD ". Revise label to clarify that 8,682 VPD is the TIA 2 -way estimate. The figure 4,341 VPD may be mistaken as a total 2 -way estimate, which it is not. 5. Note: ground cover hardier than turf grass is required for slopes steeper than 3:1. [ACDSM- 8.A.2] 6. Sheet 4 — Identify storm inlet structure with table value, T, spread at curb (ft) listed = 15.83. 7. Sheet 4 — Revise proposed fence near townhouse lot lines to match proposed length of 5' wooden fence shown on road plans (SUB201400066); on road plans, this fence extends farther south. 8. Sheet 3 — Provide capacity /spread calculations and VDOT type inlet located between the two Filterra units proposed for the NE corner of the parking lot. 9. 18- 5.1.20.b. — "No storage tanks and loading facilities shall be located closer than one hundred (100) feet from any lot line." Show that underground gasoline storage tanks are at least 100 -ft from lot lines. [Also, #3, above] 10. Furnish drainage easements for storm drain pipes serving Road `A.' File: SDP201400047- briarwood -FSP- 071414 • UQ�i County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Phone 434- 296 -5832 Memorandum To: Scott Collins From: Christopher P. Perez, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: T* 2, 2014 Revised July 9, 2014 Subject: SDP - 201400047 Briarwood Commercial Gas Station— Final Site Plan Fax 434 - 972 -4126 The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] Conditions of Initial Plan Approval (from approval letter dated 6/4/14): 1. [32.6] A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. Final: See Final Plan comments below. Comment still valid. 2. [32.5.3(a)] This application was reviewed against Site Development Plan requirements only. Any subdivision related comments are provided for reference only unless necessary for final site plan approval. Prior to final site plan approval the final subdivision plat and road plan serving the commercial lots shall be approved by the County, and the plat recorded in the Clerk's Office. The deed book page information of the recorded plat shall be provided on the final site plan. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 3. [32.5.2(n) & (i)] As proposed a portion of the private road is taking place on the adjacent residential parcel zoned PRD, specifically within the 30' vegetative buffer on the residential parcel and within the area of the 20' undisturbed buffer between the residential and commercial zonings. As you know the property owner was sited for violations of the above two areas by the Zoning Department for unauthorized disturbance of these areas. The applicant is currently working to remedy the site plan violation of the 3 0' vegetative buffer through a mitigation plan (SDP2013 -35). Prior to final site plan approval the mitigation plan must be approved by the County, to include ARB, Planning Staff, and Zoning staff. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. Also, the applicant is attempting to remedy the disturbance of the 20' undisturbed buffer through a special exception as described in Section 21.7(c). The applicant intends to utilize the mitigation plan described above as an exhibit to take to the Board of Supervisors for review /approval. Prior to the special exception going to the Board of Supervisors the proposed plantings in the mitigation plan must be approved by ARB, Planning staff, and Zoning staff. Prior to final site plan approval the applicant shall receive approval of the mitigation plan, and receive the Board of Supervisors approval of the special exception. If all the above have been satisfied then the plantings shall be provided on the final site plan's landscaping plan. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. Staff" is cotice.rned with the cum °til proposal.. a, tho entraa)ce to the the relies erairely € i. the above app i- ovals, Notably tite road as ctin,errtly depicted r -elles heavily catr retaining. wales, staff is aappt•e herrsive al:OUt tfte If)J)IiCanr 1m.1 idirag the r°ecluircd. plantings as described <tlac,ve cots these retaining �e<alls. Verri.:6caadoia Na-ill. lark rea:luire €1 prior to 11narl site plan aa:p pr( arl dual the retaining Nulls can sustain the required f.rla ntingl.; weip: t and tthaat, the plantings roof. sl sterns will not Jeopardize t:lae inteo;ritV €af' tfae walls. Final- Item lea be addressed on road plan anti by .Engineering Staff. 4. [32.71M, 32.5.44), :32.5.2(n), 32.7.9.7 Vehicala?-.Ac.,ess to Me Siier The fitraal site phaii 'Bor tine ga station sh.aa.11 incltade the Private road which is to serve the site. to .include (fie ig I.r.t- i:ra- .rigl.r.i- ratr:t portion, €:rfthe :private; r €>a €f w.ia..i.eb aa".e.� se :.Rte 29 '.l:`la..is re€ltt.irei.).a.em .i : being predicated b\ tpte '.l'1A iN- 1`rich r°elie€f. €m the ri�rfat -in- ri <„.Irt -ow to dislaerse: t.rar.ffle f'r €aria the site. Finarl:.1.tem tea be addressed on Mad plan and is not required for the final site plan. Per diseusr�ions with VD01' they road plan ia°ill dictate the right in right oral:. Al, o. the road. plan d.e=ptcts aa. aao e grutid tor� ae manactnet:t,cility near the 11 rC,l't't- € >rr1' pacar• ion of'th pri %. rte road, w -hi h et'ves as the road's storm water. Becaarrse the r'oa d is required to serve the gars station. and tlae storrrtwaatcr fiw lity is visible frorrr liter 29, the. torrriwarter facility shall be :sereened Jset- el The - mqut.red lanclse ape scree.ta.ina, slaaa.11 be l�r€ vi.c ed € .n. the l:andsc<)pe plan € ?fie. final y.r.t.� plan. �.,.. l °imah Coniment nax longer valid 'as .thy, Water being sent to the SWM l'oe ilk- is not from tile gas Station witr;< 5. [32.5.2(a) & (n)] General information. The adjacent parcel, north of the site, is labeled on the site plan as Tract B, TNT 32G Parcel 1, Zoned C -1; however, the GIS and previously recorded plats depict this land as TMP 032GO- 08- 00- OOOAO, Open Space, Zoned PRD. Revise. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 6. [32.5.2(a), (n) & (i)] General information. As discussed above a portion of the private road is taking place on the adjacent residential parcel TNT 032GO- 08- 00- OOOAO. As such this parcel shall be listed on the site plan. Throughout the site plan revise to include the correct adjacent parcel information, such as: owner information, tax map parcel number, and zoning. Final: The information provided on the site plan for this parcel is not accurate. Revise plan. Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 7. [32.5.2(1)] All proposed off site easements will need to be submitted as a plat and be recorded prior to approval of the final site plan. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 8. 32m51(n)] l'r'gposed arrrl3r °!)r e:rrac;rtl. 1 "he road ;°e,rvi.nfy (h'c site is proposed tea be private. The a appf.i.carat:' sa chosen to move fc n -vaard with the s6division of COTY11,11er•cia.rl lots and the road plan lbr• review/ approval of the pt•ia-aa:te; t'caat.cl that t•r•tererts county flr'ivt:tte Road.. Standards put'suarrt. to Section 14- 4121:1. f"lae private road request will racea:l to .ra.a.eet the rregiiiremcnth € f Se€;ti€ n :14- 234..Af"ter: the subdivision aara€:1 road plan has been t'e:v ierve€ af:rpp?r• €-rye d and recorded ttae site palaara diarll depict, the private road aatrcl then the final site plan can I.ae aappr°oved. (provided all other site plan re;l. iu d re q ireraw ats .Wove bco:ra. me=t). Fi aL Item to he addressed on road plan mid is not required -for the fliNd site plan. 9. ]32,53.6(1)n x•.1.2,.1lir) {.l).] Pr°t.y)osed irrflrr °<ar- rrrrrrrt. Two way vehicle access aisles rare .rqui:red to h€ )0' The playa proposes access way" €af'varying width,, such as .16' and :1 S'. This is -not as €f€; €lrraate. Revise to provide; i`or tl e i,eq ir•ed 20' rrrirrirYrttraa fcar ar'll two wav accesses, Final. Cornment ac rtress,,ciL 4.12.19(c').] Screening,, I)urrrpsfer S shall be screened as required by sec:•don 32, 9 rtrtta i,vher'e= tr �lir:crl3l <... <.<c:iif:rrr 1. f1. _ sattr t.a.e €:ttr.r.r:pastc.r is aapap�r €�prr- aieiv scrc;s;tacd. On dw, final �.ite plan. prr €wi€l.e t i material tried in the encl €?sues and the height of'the: erne loswv— `inal: Commentaaddre- ,&s.ad, K ( f.. 132,5.2(n)) Pr�ri�ar.>se irrr 3r °tat c:r tE;rrf. Oil s.ia.ect , th.e pl.aaa.t. dopi s as thaatche€l area a €ljaace;rat to the 6 paar1 <11l, - spare frtatatittp: the 1�1.ailditak;. t::lra the site i.alaan label this mil.ar€ v aaaellt, i ='i;nd. Comment- addressed. 1 proposed rtrIj.) ?- a'r- 'c'rrreYIL Sk CCi 1. gell :'anal 110t'es, 1,111 €jer retaillin walls, there i a note read,,: `` o r�e aining at- <ai /,s are p 'rl, €�.� d ". '.l:he proposal utilizes retEait.d. ag wadl.s. ".l:he o.ow A all be re;vised"'rea11 oved oa1 the final site pl aaa, .j1.. s-o€ the engit.le ri:aa;g, € etails for l;l o aetaini.r.1.e walls eh.alf be pr€ vidod hi the fm al site plaa.11. Final- l:tem to be addressed on road plan nand is not squire .ior the f nal site Phan. 13. [32.5.2(n)] Proposed improvement. Dimension the full height and width of the retaining walls required for construction. Final: The applicant relies on the road plan to provide the required information; however, this is not sufficient. This above information shall be provided on the final site plan to assure the proposal fits onsite and works for the required landscaping. Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 14. [32.5.2 (n)] Proposed improvement. What kind of walls are the retaining walls? Are they block/redi -rock walls, geogrid? Provide this information on the plan. Final: The applicant relies on the road plan to provide the required information; however, this is not sufficient. This information shall be provided on the final site plan to assure the proposal fits onsite and works for the required landscaping. Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 15. [32.5.2 (n)] Proposed improvement. On the plan provide the limits of disturbance for the proposal, to include the area to construct these walls, and the private road. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 16. [32.5.2 (m) & (n), 4.12.17(b)] Proposed Egress. "Entrances to parking areas from public streets or private roads shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation standards... " VDOT approval shall be required. Final: Comment still valid. 17, [32.5.2 (ao)] Prqp(Xwd .IndicLatc the height €af'tll.e to as caala€ py strttot:trrc. Also provide the height the € f the „ tas staati €eta btail €9ing, Does the site propose to haave a Joaa €ling spa€ &e if soa pirovi €1e the location and di €rlerlsiora of'the loazdhl :), space. Final, Coanineart. addinessed. 18. [32.5.2(m), 14- 422(D) & 32.7.9.51 Planting Strip. Dimension the sidewalks and the plantings strips. Planting strips are required to be a minimum of 6' in width. If the applicant wishes to seek a special exception by the Board of Supervisors for the planting strip requirements per 14 -422F please submit the request and appropriate documentation. Final: Comment still valid. A waiver request has been provided to staff under the subdivision of the commercial lots. The 3' planting strip is contingent on the waiver being approved. The waiver is currently being processed and shall go to the Planning Commission per the subdivision ordinance; rather, than the Board of Supervisors as previously relayed to the applicant. Notably if the required street landscaping is pushed outside of the planting strip and is to be behind the sidewalk, landscape easements to contain these plantings shall be platted on the final subdivision plat for the commercial lots, as they are no longer in the right of way. The easements and required street trees shall be shown on the final site plan, as the required trees cannot be bonded on the road plan be they are out of the right of way. 19, [32. 5.2(l)[ utilities. Provide the locatioii ofany exismip- wilities amid utility easerneribs includirip telej)korie, cable, electric aild o s. ?nl -a Final. Comment addreswtl. 20. [32 01. ,582(1))j Landscape Ian, When The landsca e phan is provided as, tare that the proposed plantings aro p outside of existing and pl-oposed cx<asertaertts or provide prooff ofmthorizatloli. ftoin the ea sement h.ol der, LF i Lnnadh Comm. ew addressed. 21 , [32.5.2(e)j Land ,,--qpe pkm, -file 1.1ti'lities on fli(; larld. cape plan to ensure that plaraing. are not oc'eurrille overtop of cas'ejacnts of pipes. Finah anumen-taddressed. 22. [32.5.2(e), 32.7.9.4(c)] Existing landscape features. The site has a small stand of existing trees onsite; however, none of these trees are depicted on the existing conditions sheet. Depict these trees on existing conditions sheet of the plan. If they are to be removed, on the plan depict this. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. [32.5.2 (4) & (n)] InIlbrination regarding, proposed use. Assure that the proposed . ize of the building is correct througfloui all. 511m.'i, of Itle site plan, As shoo .1. inider ty(meral -notes, Ekisfingp Propos'ed Ulse enid hnperviou,,.Area fir the building lists '3,600 SF buildimy, hoe 4--ever. sheet 3 provides for a 5W.04 ' bui ldillCr wh.ichi� 1.,700 SI". Revise., Final, Commen-taddressed, 4, 112,-51 (b) 4% (M &- 4.1.12(a)111). 4.114(a)j ,Uaxilnufn number ofparkin,- spaces, Sheet I., General Notes. ander Pa-iting Required, asS-Ure the Calculation Wifize" the Correct of 1he buildin.- eurrently it's listed a. 3.600 SK Ffind- Commeni addressed. 41—All"', nIumin number of/xv*ingsp,-xes, Sheet I., General Notes, [32.5.2 (1), & (M & 4.12.2(a )( L 4.11A(a.)� 44, andor Parking Pro- used the plan lists '37 spaces; ho�-%,e'ver, the numbel- of arking ,.,tpaces in a parking area p L may j)ot exceed the riumber of spaces requill"ed Illore than menty (.20) pereem, I'his, :,its; appears to be over the Illaximiull permitted, Rcvis�. Finah Com=,mi addressed, (? -5, Wih the proposed lwidening of Briar�vood [.)rive the proposed pas station 6, [» ?« 21.71 45 iback, af Final, 'i'lominent addressed, 27. [32.5.2(i)] Street names. Provide street names for all proposed streets for approval from E911. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 8, 132.5.2(s)] 'Irklifional ()n. the site Plan. Provide a diag-rnlll. for Fuel Truck Turning IVIoveilletils, `I"his iriforT•ation Nvill Ai.id ire staffrevie1w, ofchiily operations of site. Ffind. Due to hinge aisle qvidth canament lin longer applicable. zn - 29. [32.5.2(a)] Being this site is located in the Entrance Corridor (EC), approval from the Architectural Review Board (ARB) is required prior to final site plan approval. Final: Comment still valid. 3 M [13;15.2(n)j Will as free .-,tal)dingy sign be on flle propero." It so, sho A,, the, location. of tile, sigfl. A. separate sign Permit �-vill Ileed to be submitted, however, you ""ill raced to sho"V tile locatioll of, tile sig"ll oil tile site 1-.31all, Fhnab. Coniinentaddressed. 4 31. [32.5.2(n) & (p)] The following will be required for final site plan approval: - Outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location, description, and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire [Sec. 32.7.8 & Sec. 4.17] - A landscape plan in accordance with [Sec. 32.7.9]. Final: See Final Plan comments below. Comment still valid. 32. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Sheet 6, plant schedule, AG — Amalanchier x Grandifora (Serviceberry) is depicted as 2.5" caliper; however, the approved plant canopy list utilizes height of 6 -7' at the time of planting to qualify for the 130 SF canopy calcs. Revise appropriately. 33. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Sheet 6, plant schedule, CC - Cercis Canadensis (Redbud) is depicted as 2.5" caliper; however, the approved plant canopy list utilizes height of 6 -7' at the time of planting to qualify the 124 SF canopy calcs. Revise appropriately. 34. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Sheet 6, plant schedule, PY — Prunus Yedoensis (Yoshino Cherry) is depicted as 2.5" caliper; however, the approved plant canopy list utilizes height of 6 -7' at the time of planting to qualify the 99 SF canopy calcs. Revise appropriately. 35. [32.7.9] Landscaping. There is a note provided on sheet 3, which states: "Existing 20' land use buffer see sheet 10 for mitigation planting... "; however, there is not a sheet 10 associated with the final site plan. Revise the note appropriately. 36. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Provide the approved mitigation plan's landscape sheet in the final site plan for the gas station. 37. [32.7.9] Landscaping. If the required street landscaping is pushed outside of the planting strip and is to be behind the sidewalk, landscape easements to contain these plantings shall be platted on the final subdivision plat for the commercial lots. The easements and required street trees shall be shown on the final site plan, as the street trees cannot be bonded on the road plan be they are out of the right of way. 38. [Sec. 32.7.8 & Sec. 4.171 Lighting. A lighting note appears on sheet 7, but it does not include the required wording. Add the standard lighting note to the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3, 000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one halffootcandle. " 39. [32.6] Grading. All grading for the site shall be provided on the final site plan. Currently the applicant relies on the road plan to provide the required information; however, this is not sufficient. The information must also be provided on the final site plan. Revise. 40. [Comment] To avoid confusion the title of the plan should be revised to `Briarwood Gas Station — Final Site Plan SDP201400047 ". 41. [Comment] Throughout the plan directional arrows are provided throughout the drive aisles; however, the arrows are backwards (have drivers driving on the left side of the aisle). This is very dangerous and may cause substantial confusion for patrons of the gas station. Revise. E911— Andrew Slack 1. The applicant should contact this office with a list of three (3) proposed road names to be used before final approval is given. ARB — Margaret Maliszewski See attached comments ACSA — Alex Morrison See attached comments Building Inspections Jay Schlothauer - No objections Fire and Rescue — Robbie Gilmer - No objections VDOT— Troy Austin Comments pending. Engineering Comments — John Anderson Comments pending. Please contact Christopher P. Perez in the Planning Division by using c,2erez(2a1bemar1e. org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3443 for further information. 0 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 June 23, 2014 Dale Lee Cupp — A.I.A. Architect 1951 -A Evelyn Byrd Ave Harrisonburg, VA 22801 RE: ARB- 2014 -40: Briarwood Commercial 032GOOOOOOOOA0 Dear Mr. Cupp: I have reviewed the resubmittal for the above - referenced application and I have the following comments: 1. Increase the height of shrubs for the stormwater facility located south of the gas station and for the outfall area located north of Briarwood Drive to 24" minimum at planting. Increase the size of the London Planetree north of Briarwood Drive to 3'/2" caliper minimum at planting. 2. The ARB considered the canopy /glare issue at its June 23, 2014 meeing. Regarding the color for the underside of the canopy, provide photographs showing the difference between the plain and textured surfaces, confirming that the textured surface reduces glare. Or, install the canopy underside material marked ".032 white aluminum embossed" as the exposed face. 3. A lighting note appears on the plan, but it does not include all the required wording. Add the standard lighting note to the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 4. Provide additional information on the plan to show how the upper retaining wall will accommodate the planting of trees close -by. Indicate if geogrid reinforcement will be used for that wall. If it will be used, show on the plan how far the geo -grid will extend beyond the wall. 5. Comment #11 from our May 19, 2014 letter stated that interior parking lot trees should be revised to a large species, 2' /z" caliper at planting. The 2'/Z" caliper change has been made; however, the change to a large species has not. It is recommended that the serviceberry and redbud at the interior of the parking lot be replaced with a large tree species. It may be expensive and /or difficult to find serviceberry and redbud at that size. 6. The ARB considered the retaining wall block at its June 23, 2014 meeting. The RediRock Ledgestone will be appropriate if the landscaping is increased to sufficiently minimize the effect of the monotone white color. This can be accomplished with plant size, spacing and species. 7. The version of the mitigation area landscape plan included in this submittal reverts to a much earlier layout that staff commented on in July, 2013. Staff's comments were addressed in the plan that the ARB reviewed in January 2014. Provide for review a detailed landscaping plan for the mitigation area (with plant schedule and plants identified) based on the plant layout reviewed by the ARB in January, 2014, not the earlier version. Please provide: 1. One set of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing. 2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. 3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staff s review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner cc: Woodbriar Associates, P O Box 5548, Charlottesville VA 22905 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Margaret Maliszewski DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB- 2014 -40: BriarwoodCommercial Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates submittal Code County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan &S # Copies Distribute To: Mitigation Plan (NIP) 2 Margaret Maliszewski Waiver Request WR Stormwater Management Plan SWMP Road Plan RP Private Road Request, with private/ public comparison (PRR) Private Road Request — Development Area PRR -DA Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) Final Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP) Final Plat P Preliminary Plat (PP) Easement Plat P Boundary Adjustment Plat BAP Rezoning Plan REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan SP -CP Reduced Concept Plan -CP Proffers (P) Bond Estimate Request (BER Draft Groundwater Management Plan -GWMP Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP) Aquifer Testing Work Plan ATWP Groundwater Assessment Report GWAR Architectural Review Board (ARB ) ARB2014 -40 Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Co pie Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: ARB 2 Margaret Maliszewski Christopher Perez From: Alex Morrison [amorrison @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 1:09 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: SDP201400047: Briarwood Commercial Lot Gas Station - Final Chris, I have reviewed the above referenced plan. My comments are as follows: • No approval for SDP201447 by the ACSA until the ACSA grants construction approval for SUB201466. • No water meter will be set until dedication of the water /wastewater infrastructure for SU B201466. • Call out BFP on the private side of the water service. • If there will be food preparation a grease interceptor should be called out (if no food preparation then respond in writing stating that). • Relocate proposed evergreen tree located 4' from the proposed water meter. • Provide fixture counts when available. • Call out water meter as "to be sized by the ACSA." • Show entire sewer to be abandoned on the existing conditions sheet. • Add ACSA General Water and Sewer Conditions. • Add ACSA sewer lateral detail. • Add ACSA water service detail. Alexander J. Morrison, EIT Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (0) 434 - 977 -4511 Ext. 116 (F) 434 - 979 -0698 Like the ACSA on Facebook at www.facebook.com /acsaconnect 1 �'IRGIT�Q' County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Phone 434 - 296 -5832 Fax 434 - 972 -4126 Memorandum To: Scott Collins From: Christopher P. Perez, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: July 2, 2014 Subject: SDP - 201400047 Briarwood Commercial Gas Station — Final Site Plan The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] Conditions of Initial Plan Approval (from approval letter dated 6/4/14): 1. [32.6] A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. Final: See Final Plan comments below. Comment still valid. 2. [32.5.3(a)] This application was reviewed against Site Development Plan requirements only. Any subdivision related comments are provided for reference only unless necessary for final site plan approval. Prior to final site plan approval the final subdivision plat and road plan serving the commercial lots shall be approved by the County, and the plat recorded in the Clerk's Office. The deed book page information of the recorded plat shall be provided on the final site plan. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 3. [32.5.2(n) & (i)] As proposed a portion of the private road is taking place on the adjacent residential parcel zoned PRD, specifically within the 30' vegetative buffer on the residential parcel and within the area of the 20' undisturbed buffer between the residential and commercial zonings. As you know the property owner was sited for violations of the above two areas by the Zoning Department for unauthorized disturbance of these areas. The applicant is currently working to remedy the site plan violation of the 30' vegetative buffer through a mitigation plan (SDP2013 -35). Prior to final site plan approval the mitigation plan must be approved by the County, to include ARB, Planning Staff, and Zoning staff. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. Also, the applicant is attempting to remedy the disturbance of the 20' undisturbed buffer through a special exception as described in Section 213(c). The applicant intends to utilize the mitigation plan described above as an exhibit to take to the Board of Supervisors for review /approval. Prior to the special exception going to the Board of Supervisors the proposed plantings in the mitigation plan must be approved by ARB, Planning staff, and Zoning staff. Prior to final site plan approval the applicant shall receive approval of the mitigation plan, and receive the Board of Supervisors approval of the special exception. If all the above have been satisfied then the plantings shall be provided on the final site plan's landscaping plan. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. Staff is concerned with the current proposal, as the entrance to the site relies entirely on the above approvals. Notably the road as currently depicted relies heavily on retaining walls, staff is apprehensive about the applicant providing the required plantings as described above on these retaining walls. Verification will be required prior to final site plan approval that the retaining walls can sustain the required plantings weight and that the plantings root systems will not jeopardize the integrity of the walls. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 4. [32.7.2.1, 32.5.2(m), 32.5.2(n), 32.7.9.71 Vehicular Access to the Site. The final site plan for the gas station shall include the private road which is to serve the site, to include the right -in- right -out portion of the private road which accesses Rte 29. This requirement is being predicated by the TIA which relied on the right -in- right -out to disperse traffic from the site. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. Also, the road plan depicts an above ground stormwater management facility near the right -in- right -out portion of the private road, which serves as the road's stormwater. Because the road is required to serve the gas station, and the stormwater facility is visible from Rte 29, the stormwater facility shall be screened per 32.7.9.7. The required landscape screening shall be provided on the landscape plan of the final site plan. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 5. [32.5.2(a) & (n)] General information. The adjacent parcel, north of the site, is labeled on the site plan as Tract B, TNT 32G Parcel 1, Zoned C -1; however, the GIS and previously recorded plats depict this land as TNT 032GO- 08- 00- OOOAO, Open Space, Zoned PRD. Revise. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 6. [32.5.2(a), (n) & (i)] General information. As discussed above a portion of the private road is taking place on the adjacent residential parcel TNT 032GO- 08- 00- OOOAO. As such this parcel shall be listed on the site plan. Throughout the site plan revise to include the adjacent parcel information, such as: owner information, tax map parcel number, and zoning. Final: The information provided on the site plan for this parcel is not accurate. Revise plan. Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 7. [32.5.2(i)] All proposed off site easements will need to be submitted as a plat and be recorded prior to approval of the final site plan. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 8. [32.5.2(n)] Proposed improvement. The road serving the site is proposed to be private. The applicant has chosen to move forward with the subdivision of commercial lots and the road plan for review/ approval of the private road that meets county Private Road Standards pursuant to Section 14 -412B. The private road request will need to meet the requirements of Section 14 -234. After the subdivision and road plan has been reviewed /approved and recorded the site plan shall depict the private road and then the final site plan can be approved (provided all other site plan related requirements have been met). Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 9 132-9s 6(i)5 a:i2,i.7() l.) llt' €pc -.se l impr• €.>vtroaiew. ,.1..wo vva —, vel.r..i.cie ,iccess ttr�e r'cguired to be, 20' rr miamire. l lic plan rm- II)oses aco ss of vary iri;._; widths,. such ra I and 1 ,.l...l)is i riot. adequate. Re i c to .provide for the require €l.20' ni.41.1 urn i.ov,ill Way l?cinah Commttbra addressed. 41.2,190 Screening. Dz nlp's -lers .S'Ilail be : ci•€ etie d as p €: quired bY, secticm 32 7.9 an(4: i,vh :r e crltlYlir.:rrl>l <, . +• :re ion 30.0. .1ssitr tile clinri stei, is AiI.)p •opriately s r•eemd, ()n the final, hits: provide the amterisal me d its the kndostire and the hti ofit of lr(. €;riclosur€ . Fina h Comment afhhresse(L 1, [32-5.2(u)l Propo,d ()n sheet ", the ]'flall depicts a fli,,itdied are, acljaceiit to the 6 p�,irking spac.Q� -6 T) lit Tri al: fl-orldrig, fl-ie building. 01- the site plaii labol tl --s improvei e Cm-nmew. addresWUL 12. [32.5.2(n)] Proposed improvement. Sheet I. general motes, Under retai.11.41- walis, there is a note Which reads: "Pu'l relainino Ivalls are propos'ed", Tht, pro-posit ufflizei, retaining vralk, 11w note shall be 1'evised"Iremoved orl Hie filial site pkai, Also, the engineering details for the retaining walls shall beprovided in the final site plan. Final: Comment partially addressed; however, the final site plan does not provide engineering details for the retaining walls. Revise final site plan to provide this information. Relying on the road plan to provide this information is not sufficient. 13. [32.5.2(n)] Proposed improvement. Dimension the full height and width of the retaining walls required for construction. Final: The applicant relies on the road plan to provide the required information; however, this is not sufficient. The information must also be provided on the final site plan as well. Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 14. [32.5.2 (n)] Proposed improvement. What kind of walls are the retaining walls? Are they block/redi-rock walls, geogrid? Provide this information on the plan. Will these retaining walls be able to support the required plantings discussed above in comment #3? Prior to final site plan approval documentation shall be provided that proves the required landscaping can be supported by these walls. Final: The applicant relies on the road plan to provide the required information; however, this is not sufficient. The information must also be provided on the final site plan as well. Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 15. [32.5.2 (n)] Proposed improvement. On the plan provide the limits of disturbance for the proposal, to include the area to construct these walls, and the private road. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 16. [32.5.2 (in) & (n), 4.12.17(b)] Proposed Egress. "Entrances to parking areas from public streets or private roads shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation standards... " VDOT approval shall be required. Final; Comment still valid. I", [32-L5.2 l 1 Noposed improvemenr llldictite ti'le height ofthe gas C1,11lopy structuiv, Also provide the height the of the g< stadon buildim), Does 1h.c she propose to have to loaditigsp,,ict``, 111, � o, provid", the locatio.n. and dimen,'Joii ofthe. Joading space. Fhn& Comment, nddresw.-d 18. [32.5.2(m), 14-422(D) & 32.7.9.51 Planting Strip. Dimension the sidewalks and the plantings strips. Planting strips are required to be a minimum of 6' in width. If the applicant wishes to seek a special exception by the Board of Supervisors for the planting strip requirements per 14-422F please submit the request and appropriate documentation. Final: Comment still valid. A waiver request has been provided to staff under the subdivision of the commercial lots. The 31 planting strip is contingent on the waiver being approved. The waiver is currently being processed and shall go to the Planning Commission per the subdivision ordinance; rather, than the Board of Supervisors as previously relayed to the applicant. 19, ['52.5.2(l)" Provide the locatioti ofaiw existir)g Ladifles ar)d Wility erase r'r'rerrt:s ilwMdij:)g teh;phoj.).e, cabic., electric wid gars. Final: Commen! addressed. 20, [352.5.2(fp), Luna'vcqpe pian, Mien the i Pi an is provided ass(Ire flint the 1.)ropose(j Plantings are outside off existir)gand proposed easements- or pro%-ide the easernent liolder. Mpala Cominen"I.- addreswd. 21, [32,5.21e)j Lan6&eij)<!pIan, (tic litifitie's oil 1h.e land"s-cap", PIm to eflsuro 111."11 plailfin.-'s.. WIC 1101 OCCUITiflil OVCrtOp 0I. or plpei, �ariala - C, 22. [32.5.2(e), 32.7.9.4(c)] Existing landscape features. The site has a small stand of existing trees onsite; however, none of these trees are depicted on the existing conditions sheet. Depict these trees on existing conditions sheet of the plan. If they are to be removed, on the plan depict this. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 13151 'b) & (n)] J�jformalron reyarding propos-ed Ytse. Assure Mal. flie proposed size of the buildilig 1!� correct tf)row)[IOUt 811 Sliects of'flie site plar), A� sheet 1, ut-ider gei-ieral notes, ExistiTig" llroposiM 1. se alld 1-inpervious A.rca f'(yi- the budditi.- Ems .3. 600 SF buildin—, however, sficei = pravide,, for ti 50'x74' building -In �vliicl) Is, 3,700 Si• , Fbwd. 2 .4., 131&2 (b) Mtl & 4-12.21(a)i31. 4J2.4(a)j.Haxi?wan n-umber <,)fpiurkh , spqceS, Sliect 1, ('ieneral Notes, under Parkij.i.i= R�qsired, assure t1le calciflation utifl-7cs tb.o correct square f0maj, of the building. curr nfly it's fisted as 3,600 SF. Final- Conument addressc d, 5, 132.` (b) & (n) & 4-11.12(n)(3), 4,112.4(a)j I.,I(zdmL(1n number Sheet 1- Ge.n.oral Noies. under Parkino Proj)osed the plan 1i : its /2-7 spaces. however., tl,ie nu•iber of I)arking, space. in a paddi'm aroa in al` .not exceed the inunbc-r of.spaces mquired Tywre flian (20) pereent. 'I'his site appears to be over the om R.c-vise. AF they Cnnt ae;�,sed, 2 6, 132.5.2(a), 21-7] Selbaeky, Wit]] tile Propose(] V� 'idel-lillg of' Briarvvoocl 13rh;e the propo.sed gas station buildir)g does nut appear to meet tile Tninimuiu 30' setback to a iniblic right of way. Re%.-' ise appropriate. Finah 27. [32.5.2(i)] Street names. Provide street names for all proposed streets for approval from E911. Final: Comment not addressed. Comment still valid. 2 9 28, [32.5.2(s)] !NdNonal h� ' 6rination, (**)I,l the site plai'l provide a diaurai-i-t ftir Fuel I`ruck I`uniir) Nloven'lellt. 11iis inl.`(Yniiation w-ffl aW.1U.'..'taff -JvvjcN ,, of dail-v oPerad.o.fis of thesile. Final: Due to IaMTe aisle width Comment no longer appficnble 29. [32;5.2(a)] Being this site is located in the Entrance Corridor (EC), approval from the Architectural Review Board (ARB). is required prior to final site plan approval. Final: Comment still valid. 30. [32'.5.2(n)j' Fill I,rI free staiidiug, si,ut be on the jvopeivy'' If'so, fl:e locaflot-i of-H'ie sigi-i. A separate sip) permit will need to be subil.)itted. b.owever. you -".111 treed u-) sbowthe location of the sign of) di .Jte PhII.I., FftuaL Commeiit addressed, 31. [32.5.2(n) & (p)] The following will be required for final site plan approval: - Outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location, description, and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire [See. 32.7.8 & See. 4.17] 4 - A landscape plan in accordance with [Sec. 32.7.9]. Final: See Final Plan comments below. Comment still valid. 32. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Sheet 6, plant schedule, AG — Amalanchier x Grandifora (Serviceberry) is depicted as 2.5" caliper; however, the approved plant canopy list utilizes height of 6 -7' at the time of planting to qualify for the 130 SF canopy calcs. Revise appropriately. 33. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Sheet 6, plant schedule, CC - Cercis Canadensis (Redbud) is depicted as 2.5" caliper; however, the approved plant canopy list utilizes height of 6 -7' at the time of planting to qualify the 124 SF canopy calcs. Revise appropriately. 34. [32.7.9] Landscaping. Sheet 6, plant schedule, PY — Primus Yedoensis (Yoshino Cherry) is depicted as 2.5" caliper; however, the approved plant canopy list utilizes height of 6 -7' at the time of planting to qualify the 99 SF canopy calcs. Revise appropriately. 35. [32.7.9] Landscaping. There is a note provided on sheet 3, which states: "Existing 20' land use buffer see sheet 10 for mitigation planting... "; however, there is not a sheet 10 associated with the final site plan. Revise the note appropriately. 36. [32.7.9] Landscaping. On sheet 6, the landscaping page, provide an additional (separate) plant schedule specific to the mitigation plan. Staff understands that the mitigation plan is still being revised, thus prior to final site plan approval the approved landscaping from the mitigation plan shall also be depicted on the final site plan. 37. [32.7.9] Landscaping. On sheet 6, the landscaping page, provide an additional (separate) plant schedule specific to the road plan. Staff understands that the road plan is still being revised, thus prior to final site plan approval the approved landscaping from the road plan shall also be depicted on the final site plan. 38. [Sec. 32.7.8 & Sec. 4.171 Lighting. A lighting note appears on sheet 7, but it does not include the required wording. Add the standard lighting note to the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3, 000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle. " 39. [32.6] Grading. All grading for the site shall be provided on the final site plan. Currently the applicant relies on the road plan to provide the required information; however, this is not sufficient. The information must also be provided on the final site plan. 40. [Comment] To avoid confusion the title of the plan should be revised.to `Briarwood Gas Station — Final Site Plan SDP201400047 ". 41. [Comment] Throughout the plan directional arrows are provided throughout the drive aisles; however, the arrows are backwards (have drivers driving on the left side of the aisle). This is very dangerous and may cause substantial confusion for patrons of the gas station. Revise. E911— Andrew Slack 1. The applicant should contact this office with a list of three (3) proposed road names to be used before final approval is given. ARB — Margaret Maliszewski See attached comments N7 ACSA — Alex Morrison See attached comments Building Inspections — Jay Schlothauer - No objections. Fire and Rescue — Robbie Gilmer - No objections VDOT— Troy Austin Comments pending: Engineering Comments — John Anderson Comments pending. Please contact Christopher P. Perez in the Planning Division by using cperez e albemarle. org or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3443 for further information. 0 Christopher Perez From: Alex Morrison [amorrison @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 1:09 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: SDP201400047: Briarwood Commercial Lot Gas Station - Final Chris, I have reviewed the above referenced plan. My comments are as follows: • No approval for SDP201447 by the ACSA until the ACSA grants construction approval for SUB201466. • No water meter will be set until dedication of the water /wastewater infrastructure for SUB201466. • Call out BFP on the private side of the water service. • If there will be food preparation a grease interceptor should be called out (if no food preparation then respond in writing stating that). • Relocate proposed evergreen tree located 4' from the proposed water meter. • Provide fixture counts when available. • Call out water meter as "to be sized by the ACSA." • Show entire sewer to be abandoned on the existing conditions sheet. • Add ACSA General Water and Sewer Conditions. • Add ACSA sewer lateral detail. • Add ACSA water service detail. Alexander J. Morrison, EIT Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (0) 434 - 977 -4511 Ext. 116 (F) 434 - 979 -0698 Like the ACSA on Facebook at www.facebook.com /acsaconnect v�RCiNl�` COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 June 23, 2014 Dale Lee Cupp — A.I.A. Architect 1951 -A Evelyn Byrd Ave Harrisonburg, VA 22801 RE: ARB- 2014 -40: Briarwood Commercial 032G0000000OA0 Dear Mr. Cupp: I have reviewed the resubmittal for the above - referenced application and I have the following comments: 1. Increase the height of shrubs for the stormwater facility located south of the gas station and for the outfall area located north of Briarwood Drive to 24" minimum at planting. Increase the size of the London Planetree north of Briarwood Drive to 3'/2" caliper minimum at planting. 2. The ARB considered the canopy /glare issue at its June 23, 2014 meeing. Regarding the color for the underside of the canopy, provide photographs showing the difference between the plain and textured surfaces, confirming that the textured surface reduces glare. Or, install the canopy underside material marked ".032 white aluminum embossed" as the exposed face. 3. A lighting note appears on the plan, but it does not include all the required wording. Add the standard lighting note to the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 4. Provide additional information on the plan to show how the upper retaining wall will accommodate the planting of trees close -by. Indicate if geogrid reinforcement will be used for that wall. If it will be used, show on the plan how far the geo -grid will extend beyond the wall. 5. Comment #11 from our May 19, 2014 letter stated that interior parking lot trees should be revised to a large species, 2'/2" caliper at planting. The 2' /z" caliper change has been made; however, the change to a large species has not. It is recommended that the serviceberry and redbud at the interior of the parking lot be replaced with a large tree species. It may be expensive and /or difficult to find serviceberry and redbud at that size. 6. The ARB considered the retaining wall block at its June 23, 2014 meeting. The RediRock Ledgestone will be appropriate if the landscaping is increased to sufficiently minimize the effect of the monotone white color. This can be accomplished with plant size, spacing and species. 7. The version of the mitigation area landscape plan included in this submittal reverts to a much earlier layout that staff commented on in July, 2013. Staff s comments were addressed in the plan that the ARB reviewed in January 2014. Provide for review a detailed landscaping plan for the mitigation area (with___ plant schedule and plants identified) based on the plant layout reviewed by the ARB in January, 2014, not the earlier version. Please provide: 1. One set of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing. 2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. 3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal' form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staff s review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner cc: Woodbriar Associates, P O Box 5548, Charlottesville VA 22905 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Margaret Maliszewski DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB- 2014 -40: BriarwoodCommercial Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates submittal Code County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan E &S # Copies Distribute To: Mitigation Plan MP) 2 Margaret Maliszewski Waiver Request (WR Stormwater Management Plan SWMP Road Plan (RP) Private Road Request, with private/ public comparison PRR Private Road Request — Development Area PRR -DA Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) Final Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP) Final Plat FP Preliminary Plat (PP) Easement Plat EP Boundary Adjustment Plat BAP Rezoning Plan Z Special Use Permit Concept Plan SP -CP Reduced Concept Plan R -CP Proffers (P) Bond Estimate Request (BER) Draft Groundwater Management Plan D -GWMP Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP Groundwater Assessment Report GWAR Architectural Review Board (ARB ) 2014 -40 Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: ARB 2 Margaret Maliszewski Christopher Perez From: Alex Morrison [ amorrison @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 1:09 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: SDP201400047: Briarwood Commercial Lot Gas Station - Final Chris, I have reviewed the above referenced plan. My comments are as follows: • No approval for SDP201447 by the ACSA until the ACSA grants construction approval for SUB201466. • No water meter will be set until dedication of the water /wastewater infrastructure for SUB201466. • Call out BFP on the private side of the water service. • If there will be food preparation a grease interceptor should be called out (if no food preparation then respond in writing stating that). • Relocate proposed evergreen tree located 4' from the proposed water meter. • Provide fixture counts when available. • Call out water meter as "to be sized by the ACSA." • Show entire sewer to be abandoned on the existing conditions sheet. • Add ACSA General Water and Sewer Conditions. • Add ACSA sewer lateral detail. • Add ACSA water service detail. Alexander J. Morrison, EIT Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (0) 434 - 977 -4511 Ext. 116 (F) 434 - 979 -0698 Like the ACSA on Facebook at www.facebook.com /acsaconnect 1 • ^�- 11�illr IlIIf1.�• COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 June 23, 2014 Dale Lee Cupp — A.I.A. Architect 1951 -A Evelyn Byrd Ave Harrisonburg, VA 22801 RE: ARB- 2014 -40: Briarwood Commercial 032GOOOOOOOOA0 Dear Mr. Cupp: I have reviewed the resubmittal for the above - referenced application and I have the following comments: 1. Increase the height of shrubs for the stormwater facility located south of the gas station and for the outfall area located north of Briarwood Drive to 24" minimum at planting. Increase the size of the London Planetree north of Briarwood Drive to 3'/2" caliper minimum at planting. 2. The ARB considered the canopy /glare issue at its June 23, 2014 meeing. Regarding the color for the underside of the canopy, provide photographs showing the difference between the plain and textured surfaces, confirming that the textured surface reduces glare. Or, install the canopy underside material marked ".032 white aluminum embossed" as the exposed face. 3. A lighting note appears on the plan, but it does not include all the required wording. Add the standard lighting note to the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 4. Provide additional information on the plan to show how the upper retaining wall will accommodate the planting of trees close -by. Indicate if geogrid reinforcement will be used for that wall. If it will be used, show on the plan how far the geo -grid will extend beyond the wall. 5. Comment #11 from our May 19, 2014 letter stated that interior parking lot trees should be revised to a large species, 2'/2" caliper at planting. The 2'/2" caliper change has been made; however, the change to a large species has not. It is recommended that the serviceberry and redbud at the interior of the parking lot be replaced with a large tree species. It may be expensive and /or difficult to find serviceberry and redbud at that size. 6. The ARB considered the retaining wall block at its June 23, 2014 meeting. The RediRock Ledgestone will be appropriate if the landscaping is increased to sufficiently minimize the effect of the monotone white color. This can be accomplished with plant size, spacing and species. 7. The version of the mitigation area landscape plan included in this submittal reverts to a much earlier layout that staff commented on in July, 2013. Staff's comments were addressed in the plan that the ARB reviewed in January 2014. Provide for review a detailed landscaping plan for the mitigation area (with plant schedule and plants identified) based on the plant layout reviewed by the ARB in January, 2014, not the earlier version. Please provide: 1. One set of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing. 2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. 3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staff s review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner cc: Woodbriar Associates, P O Box 5548, Charlottesville VA 22905 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Margaret Maliszewski DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB- 2014 -40: BriarwoodCommercial Submittal Type Requiring Revisions ( ) indicates submittal Cade County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E &S) # Copies Distribute To: Mitigation Plan (MP) 2 Margaret Maliszewski Waiver Request WR Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) Road Plan RP Private Road Request, with private /public comparison (PRR) Private Road Request — Development Area (PRR -DA Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) Final Site Plan or amendment FSP Final Plat (FP) Preliminary Plat PP Easement Plat (EP) Boundary Adjustment Plat BAP Rezoning Plan (REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP -CP) Reduced Concept Plan (R -CP) Proffers (P) Bond Estimate Request (BER) Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D -GWMP) Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP) Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP) Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR) Architectural Review Board (ARB) ARB2014 -40 Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: ARB 2 Margaret Maliszewski