HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-01-16 ACTIONS
Board of Supervisors Meeting of January 16, 2002,
January 23, 2002
1. Call to order.
AGENDA ITEM/ACTION
4. From the Public: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
There were none.)
5.1 Adopt Resolution Approving the Issuance of Industrial
Development Authority BOndS in an Amount not to Exceed
$35,000,000 for Virginia Lutheran Homes, Inc. ADOPTED.
5.2 Authorize County Executive to sign Hillsdale Drive Bus Bench
Agreement. AUTHORIZED.
5,3 Adopt policy for review of public requests for Zoning Text
Amendments. ADOPTED.
5.4 Request'to adopt C0rville Farm Road Resolution (Rural
Addition Request). ~ADOPTED.
5.5 Request to Transfer Funds from General Fund to Fire & Rescue
Division for Child Safety Seat Program. APPROVED.
5.6 ZTA-01-07. Alleys and shared driveways.' DEFERRED to
2/6/02.
6. Public hearing to consider funding the Commonwealth of
Virginia's Transportation Enhancement Program (TEA-21).
ADOPTED.
7. Public headng to consider the County's Six Year Secondary
Road Pdodty List and the VDOT Six Year Secondary Road
Construction Program for the years 200203 through 2007-08.
APPROVED County Pdodty List w/the following changes:
Moved Corville Farm Road to #4;
· Moved Hillsdale Drive to #19;
· Added White Mountain Road (Rt. 736) to the list. It may be that
this could be an extension of work already approved in that
area. Mr. Perkins said the road number be changed from Rt.
736 to Rts. 635 and 636; and,
· Need to spell Owensville Road correctly.
(Note: The Board did not approve the VDOT Six Year
Secondary Plan.)
(Note: Ms. Thomas abstained from voting on project
although no conflict of interest was found.)
In addition, the Board asked that Mr. Jim Bryan, from VDOT,
respond to the following questions:
· Mr. Martin asked why ~J, Proffit Road will take four years, and
why is it so costly;
· Mr. Bowerman asked how VDOT feels about the County
proceeding with its portion of Meadow Creek Parkway now, if
the City is not prepared to move forward with its portion;
ASSIGNMENT,.
Meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., by the
Chairman, Sally ThOmas, BOS members present:
Thomas, Dorrier, Perkins, Rooker, Bowerman,
Martin. Officers/staff: Tucker, Benish, and
~amPtner. Clerk: Bentley.
Clerk: Forward signed original resolution
(Attachment A) to McGuireWoods and copy
Virginia Lutheran Homes. File add'l signed original
resolution.
Cou, n.ty Attomeyi Obtain CoUnty Exec's signature
on agreement (Attachment B). Forward copy to
Clerk to be ~ed.
(Attachment C ).
Clerk: Forward signed odginal resolution
(Attachment D) to Jack Kelsey.
Clerk: Readvertise public headng for 2/6/02.
Clerk: Forward copy of signed resolution
(Attachment E) and advertising notice to Juan
Wade.
Pinning ~aff: Forward revised County Six Year
Secondary Road Priority List to VDOT.
County Executive: Send letter to Jim Bryan
regarding questions noted.
· Mr. Dorrier said he would like to see traffic counts for Rio Road;
and,
Mr. Dorrier asked for suggested alternatives to the Southern
Parkway.
8. ZTA-01-07. Alleys and shared driveways. DEFERRED to
2/6/02.
9. ZTA-2000-10. Appeal of Modifications and Waivers.
10. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
· CONSENSUS to, effective 7/1/02, eliminate the third monthly
meeting, and to begin the second meeting of each month at
6:00 p.m.
° Mr. Bowerrnan asked about the "Eadysville Commercial area
parking ZTA'. Mr. Benish said Planning has not received said
request.
· Ms. Thomas said staff is working on questions to ask VDOT
about the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for
the Rt. 29 Bypass. Mr. Tucker said questions need to be sent
to VDOT quickly.
° Mr. Dorrier asked the status of the citizen sun/ey. Mr. Tucker
said it has been refined and is to come out soon.
11. Adjoum at 8:40 p.m.
Clerk: Readverfise pul~lic hearing for 2/6/02.
Clerk: Advertise'public headng for 2/6/02.
Clerk: Advertise 2002 meeting schedule.
Clerk;. Send Ms. Thomas' letter to VDOT.
2
Attachment A
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, held on the
16th day of January, 2002, the following members were recorded as present:
PRESENT: David P. Bowerman; Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr.; Charles S. Martin; Walter F. Perkins;
Dennis S. Rooker; Sally H. Thomas.
On motion by Chades Martin, seconded by Dennis Rooker, the attached Resolution was adopted
by a majority of the membem of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia by a roll
call vote, the votes being recorded as follows:
MEMBER VOTE
David P. Bowerman
Lindsay G. Dorder, Jr.
Charles S. Martin
Walter F. Perkins
Dennis S. Rooker
Sally H. Thomas
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
The Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority") has considered the
application and plan of financing of Virginia Lutheran Homes-Charlottesville, L.L.C. ("VLHC"), Shenandoah Valley
Lutheran Housing, Inc. ("Shenandoah"), and Zion Place, Inc. ("Zion Place"), all 501(c)(3) organizations organized or
incorporated in Virginia which are affiliates of Virginia Lutheran Homes, Inc., a Virginia non-stock, non-profit
corporation (collectively, the "Borrowers"), requesting the ~ssuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not
to exceed $35,000,000 ("Bonds") to be issued at one time or from time to time to assist the Borrowers in financing or
refinancing its plan of financing ("Plan of Financing") for the following (collectively, "Project"): (1) the acquisition,
expansion, construction and equipping by VLHC of a residential care facility for the aged currently containing 75
residential units known as Branchlan ds Village located at 1300 Branchlands Drive, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 in
the County of Albemarle, Virginia, the expansion of which facility will include the acquisition of an approximately 1
acre parcel of land adjacent to the existing facility and the construction of an additional 86 residential units; (2) the
refinancing of an outstanding balance of approximately $1,700,000 on a mortgage loan by the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") to Shenandoah, the proceeds of which Shenandoah used
to finance its construction of a Iow-income residential care facility for the aged containing 39 residential units known
as Luther Crest, located at 9138 Congress Street, New Market, Virginia 22844 in the County of Shenandoah, Virginia;
(3) the refinancing of an outstanding balance of approximately $4,200,000 on a mortgage loan by HUD to Zion Place,
the proceeds of which Zion Place used to finance its construction of a Iow-income residential care facility for the aged
containing 123 residential units known as Luther Manor, located at 350 Malibu Drive, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452
in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia; (4) related and routine capital expenditures of the Borrowers; and (5) amounts
required for reserves, working capital, capitalized interest and costs of issuance in connection with the foregoing.
The Authority held a public hearing on the Borrowers' application and Plan of Financing on January 9, 2002,
as required by Section 147(0 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), and Section 15.2-4906 of
the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code"). Section 147(f) of the Code also provides that the
governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility
financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds.
The Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("County"); a portion of the
Project is to be located in the County; and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board")
constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County.
The Authority has recommended that the Board approve the Plan of Financing and the issuance of the
Bonds.
A copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, pursuant to the Borrowers' Plan of
Financing, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement
have been filed with the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF
ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board approves (i) the Plan of Financing and (ii) the issuance of the Bonds pursuant thereto by
the Authority for the benefit of the Borrowers, as required by Section 147(0 of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the
Virginia Code to assist the Borrowers in their Plan of Financing.
2. The approval of the Plan of Financing and the issuance of the Bonds do not constitute an
endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Plan of Financing or the
Borrowers.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Attachment B
LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of November, 2001 by and between County of
Al~)emarle, Virginia, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter referred to as the
"County," and the City of Charlottesville, Virgima, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia,
hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WHEREAS, the City, through the Charlottesville Transportation Service ("CTS"), desires to locate
a bus bench on County property at the intersection of Hillsdale Drive and Incarnation Drive in the County
for the convenience of CTS bus passengers in the Branchlands area; and
WHEREAS, the County is willing to allow the CTS to use part of its property for such a purpose.
WITNESS:
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual premises stated herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement is to allow the CTS to install a bus bench on the County's
property at the intersection of Hillsdale Drive and Incarnation Drive. The bench is for the benefit of bus
riders.
2. Premises: For the uses described in section 4 of this Agreement, the County hereby licenses to
CTS that part of the County's premises marked "Bus Bench," hereinafter referred to as the "Premises"
and shown on Attachment "A," which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement.
3. Term: The term of this Agreement shall be one (1) year from the date hereof, and shall automatically
renew for an additional one (1) year term on the anniversary date. Either party, however, may terminate
this Agreement after three months by giving one month's notice to the other party of its intent to
terminate.
4. Uses of the Premises: CTS may use the premises for providing a bus bench for its passengers.
5. Access: CTS and its passengers may use the County's property to get to and from the bus bench.
6. Prior Approval of Bus Bench Installation: CTS shall obtain the County's written approval before
placing the bus bench on the premises. The County's Director of the Department of Planning and
Community Development, or his designee, shall be authorized to approve the bus bench. This approval
shall not be unreasonably withheld.
7. Maintenance: CTS shall be solely responsible for the maintenance of the bus bench and the
Premises, and they shall be maintained in a safe condition at all times.
8. Liability: The City agrees to name the County to its general liability insurance' policy as
an additional insured for the CTS's operation of the bus bench on the County's property. The City shall
provide the County a writing showing that it has been so added to the City's general liability insurance
policy within five (5) days of the County's execution of this Agreement.
9. Title, Access and Authority: The County covenants and warrants to the City that it presently owns the
fee simple interest in and to the Premises; that the County is duly authorized and empowered to grant this
License; and that the person executing this license on behalf of the County warrants himself to be duly
authorized to bind the County hereto.
5
10. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and
supercedes any prior understandings or oral or written agreements between the parties respecting the
within subject matter.
11. Modifications: This Agreement may not be modified except in a writing signed by the parties.
Attachment C
POLICY FOR SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Application for a Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA), made by citizens, may be submitted four (4) times
annually. The Planning Commission or the Board of Supervisors may initiate a ZTA at any time
deemed appropriate by adoption of a resolution of intent to amend the ordinance. Prior to the
submittal of an application, a preliminary conference shall be held with Planning and Zoning
Department staff to discuss the proposal.
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment applications shall be filed at the Department of Building Code
and Zoning Services. The application shall be accompanied by cash or check made payable to the
"County of Albemarle, Virginia," in the amount of six hundred and sixty-five dollars ($665.00).
Procedures for amending the Zoning Ordinance are found in Chapter 18, Section 33 of the
Ordinance. General procedures for processing ZTA are provided in Attachment A. In general, ZTA
applications made by the public follow a two step process for review.
Step '1 ~- Upon submittal of the amendment request, the Planning and Zoning Staff (and other
Departments/agencies, as necessary) will review the request for its merits and consistency with the
review criteria identified below. Upon completion of this initial evaluation, staff will recommend to the
Planning Commission whether to proceed with development of an amendment to the ordinance. The
Commission may choose to move forward with a text amendment or deny the request for an
amendment. Should the Commission approve moving forward with an amendment, it will do so by
adopting a resolution of intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance. This resolution establishes the scope
of the amendment to be considered for adoption. The Commission's action may vary from the
applicant's amendment request, but will reflect what the Commission deems to be the appropriate
amendment to address the general public interest (i.e., public necessity, health, safety, convenience,
general welfare, good zoning practices, and the aesthetic values and priorities of the public). Upon
adoption of the resolution of intent to amend the ordinance, the method to address the issues
identified by the resolution, and the priority for completing such work, shall be established by the
County based on the proposal's relationship to other text amendments and other work priorities as
established by the County and managed by the Zoning Text Amendment Team. This team includes
the Director of Planning and Community Development, Zoning Administrator, and County Attorney.
Please note that approval of a resolution of intent to amend the Ordinance does not insure ultimate
approval of a text amendment--only that a text amendment will be studied and drafted for further
consideration.
Within ninety days after the application deadline for a citizen requested amendment, the Planning
Commission shall take action on whether to proceed forward with a resolution of intent to amend the
Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Supervisors shall receive notice of the Planning Commission's
action on the applicant's request for amendment and, at its discretion, choose to act on the request.
Step 2 -- Once the Commission has adopted a resolution of intent, staff will further evaluate the
proposed request and develop text amendment language for consideration by the Planning
Commission. A public hearing will be held by the Commission to receive public comment. The
Commission will recommend an action to the Board of Supervisors. The Board will hold a public
hearing and act on the amendment. For any given application, staff may use additional public input
opportunities and Planning Commission work sessions in developing the text amendment language.
This request will be reviewed based on its merits and consistency with the following criteria and make
a positive finding. It shall be the responsibility of the citizen requesting a Zoning Text Amendment to
submit a written response to the criteria, including an explanation/justification as to how the proposed
amendment meets the criteria.
A. How is it consistent with the goals, principles, objectives and recommendations of the
Comprehensive Plan?
B. How is it consistent with the Purpose and Intent of the Zoning Ordinance as noted in Section 1.4
of the ordinance (Attachmen [ B)?
How is it consistent with the Purpose and Intent for the Ordinance section being amended?
How does the request serve the general public interest as opposed to the proprietary interest of
the applicant or address an isolated/unique situation or hardship?
E. Does the request address an inconsistency, error, or ambiguity in the construction of the
ordinance affecting its application?
If additional information is required, it is the responsibility of the applicant to submit this
information to the Planning Department in a timely fashion. The applicant will be informed of any
specific items that will be needed for review by the staff in a timely manner.
Adopted by Board of Supervisors, January 16, 2002
Attachment D
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THAT CORVILLE FARM ROAD BE TAKEN INTO THE
SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS AS A RURAL ADDITION
WHEREAS, Corville Farm Road, described in more detail below, was established in 1971 and
currently serves at least three families per mile; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed that Albemarle County's
Subdivision Ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways pursuant to Virginia
Code § 33.1-72.1; and
WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting Corville Farm Road, the Board
finds that neither the original developer or developers nor any successor developers retain a speculative
interest in property abutting Corville Farm Road.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
requests that Corville Farm Road be add ed to the secondary system of state highways pursuant to
Virginia Code § 33.1-72.1 (D), as such road is more particularly described as follows:
Name of Street: Corville Farm Road Length: 0.25 miles
From: Greenwood Road - State Route 691
To: The terminus at the culdesac
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet
Plat Recorded: Date: 01 July 1970 Deed Book: 474
Date: 23 December 1971 Deed Book: 499
Page: 009
Page: 376
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described above, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation
to improve Corville Farm Road to the prescribed minimum standards and to fun d these improvements
pursuant to Virginia Code § 33.1-72.1 (D).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a Resolution
duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by vote of 6 to 0, as recorded below, at a
meeting held on January 16, 2002.
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Aye
Mr. Bowerman x
Mr. Dorrier x
Nay
Ms. Humphris
Mr. Martin
Mr. Perkins
Ms. Thomas
X
X
X
X
10
Attach ment E
PROJECT ENDORSEMENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation procedure
for TEA-21 Enhancement Grant application, it is necessary that a request by resolution be received from
the local government or state agency in order for the Virginia Department of Transportation to approve an
enhancement project in the County of Albemarle.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia.
does hereby request the Commonwealth Transportation Board to fund the Crozet Downtown Streetscape
Project.
BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the
tota cost of this project, and that if the County of Albemarle subsequently elects to cancel this project, it
hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the cost
expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation.
11
David P. Bowerman
Rio
Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800
Walter E Perkins
White Hall
Dennis S. Rooker
Jack Jouett
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
Jan uary 23, 2002
Ms. Cynthia L. Hendren
McGuire Woods Battle & Boothe, L. L. P.
One James Center
901 East Cary St.
Richmond, VA 23219-4030
Dear Ms. Hendren:
At its January 16, 2002 meeting, the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution approving the
issuance of Industrial Development Authority Bonds in an amount not to exceed $35,000,000 for Virginia
Lutheran Homes, Inc. I have enclosed the original signed resolution.
Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you
Sincerely,
Laurel A. Bentley, CMC
Senior Deputy Clerk
Attachment
Printed on recycled paper
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, held on the
16th day of January, 2002, the following members were recorded as present:
PRESENT: David P. Bowerman; Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr.; Charles S. Martin; Walter F. Perkins;
Dennis S. Rooker; Sally H, Thomas.
On motion by Charles Martin, seconded by Dennis Rooker, the attached Resolution was adopted
by a major'r[y of the members of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia by a roll
call vote, the votes being recorded as follows:
MEMBER VOTE
David P. Bowerman
Lindsay G, Dorrier, Jr.
Charles S. Martin
Walter F. Perkins
Dennis S. Rooker
Sally H. Thomas
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
The Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia
("Authority") has considered the application and plan of financing of Virginia Lutheran
Homes-Charlottesville, L.L.C. CVLHC"), Shenandoah Valley Lutheran Housing, Inc.
("Shenandoah"), and Zion Place, Inc. ("Zion Place"), all 501(c)(3) organizations
organized or incorporated in Virginia which are affiliates of Virginia Lutheran Homes,
Inc., a Virginia non-stock, non-profit corporation (collectively, the "Borrowers"),
requesting the issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed
$35,000,000 ("Bonds") to be issued at one time or from time to time to assist the
Borrowers in financing or refinancing its plan of financing ("Plan of Financing") for the
following (collectively, "Project"): (1) the acquisition, expansion, construction and
equipping by VLHC of a residential care facility for the aged currently containing 75
residential units known as Branchlands Village located at 1300 Branchlands Drive,
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 in the County of Albemarle, Virginia, the expansion of
which facility will include the acquisition of an approximately 1 acre parcel of land
adjacent to the existing facility and the construction of an additional 86 residential units;
(2) the refinancing of an outstanding balance of approximately $1,700,000 on a mortgage
loan by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") to
Shenandoah, the proceeds of which Shenandoah used to finance its construction of a low-
income residential care facility for the aged containing 39 residential units known as
Luther Crest, located at 9138 Congress Street, New Market, Virginia 22844 in the County
of Shenandoah, Virginia; (3) the refinancing of an outstanding balance of approximately
$4,200,000 on a mortgage loan by HUD to Zion Place, the proceeds of which Zion Place
used to finance its construction of a low-income residential care facility for the aged
containing 123 residential units known as Luther Manor, located at 350 Malibu Drive,
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia; (4) related and
routine capital expenditures of the Borrowers; and (5) amounts required for reserves,
working capital, capitalized interest and costs of issuance in connection with the
foregoing.
The Authority held a public hearing on the Borrowers' application and Plan of
Financing on January 9, 2002, as required by Section 147(0 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), and Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code"). Section 147(t) of the Code also provides that
the govemmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is
located must approve the issuance of the bonds.
The Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia
("County"); a portion of the Project is to be located in the County; and the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental unit of the County.
The Authority has recommended that the Board approve the Plan of. Financing
and the issuance of the Bonds.
A copy of the Authoritv's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds,
pursuant to the Borrowers' Plan of Financing, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a
certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the
Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board appioves (i) the Plan of Financing and (ii) the issuance of the
Bonds pursuant thereto by the Authority for the benefit of the Borrowers, as required by
Section 147(0 of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Virginia Code to assist the
Borrowers in their Plan of Financing.
2. The approval of the Plan of Financing and the issuance of the Bonds do
not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the
creditworthiness of the Plan of Financing or the Borrowers.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this
16th day of January, 2002.
[SEAL]
Clerk, Board of Supervisors of thcl~o'~unty
Albemarle
of
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle
County, Virginia ("Authority") certifies as follows:
1. A meeting of the Authority was duly called and held on January 9, 2002, at 4:30
o'clock p.m. in Room 235, on the 2nd floor of the County Office Building at 401 McIntire Drive,
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901, pursuant to proper notice given to each Director of the Authority
before such meeting. The meeting was open to the public. The time of the meeting and the
place at which the meeting was held provided a reasonable opportunity for persons of differing
views to appear and be heard.
2. The Chairman announced the commencement of a public hearing on the
application and plan of f'mancing of Virginia Lutheran Homes-Charlottesville, L.L.C.,
Shenandoah Valley Lutheran Housing, Inc., and Zion Place, Inc., all of which are affiliates of
Virginia Lutheran Homes, Inc., and that a notice of the hearing was published once a week for
two successive weeks in newspapers having general circulation in the County of Albemarle,
Virginia, the County of Shenandoah, Virginia and the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
(collectively, the "Notice"), with the second publications appearing not less than seven days nor
more than twenty-one days prior to the hearing date. A copy of the Notice has been filed with
the minutes of the Authority and is attached as Exhibit A.
3. A summary of the statements made at the public hearing is attached as Exhibit B.
4. Attached as Exhibit C is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution
("Resolution") adopted at such meeting of the Authority by a majority of the Directors present at
such meeting. The Resolution constitutes all formal action taken by the Authority at such
meeting relating to matters referred to in the Resolution. 'The Resolution has not been repealed,
revoked, rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on this date.
5. The Resolution referred to in paragraph 4 constitutes all formal action taken by
the Authority relating to matters referred to in the Resolution. The Resolution has not been
repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on the date hereof.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Authority, this 9th day of January, 2002.
Exhibits:
A - Copy of Certified Notice from Newspaper
B - Summary of Statements
C - Public Hearing Resolution
ecre~ ~ ~f~
S tary, Industrial Iffvelopme~ Authority
of Albemarle County,"Virginia
-2-
EXHIBIT A
The Daily Progress
P.O. BOX 9030
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22906
TELEPHON E: (804)978-72'10
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED IN
THE DAILY PROGRESS , A NEWSP.~J:ER IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA,
AND APPEARED tN THE ISSUE(S) DATED DECEMBSR
JANUARY 2002.
PUBLISHING FEE:
2001.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS 3"/ DAY OF December
Page 1
· NOT~CE OF PUBUC HF-~G ON PROPOSED
REVENUE BOND PLAN OF FINAND[N8
INDU~T,aJAL D:---V'ELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF
ALbeMARLE COUN'iT, VIRGINIA
Al~smsdo Cau~.~y, Virgi.ni~, ('AC.h~rity"} w~l
LL,C, ('VEHC% S~er~r~==h V~aLLt~eran Hauling,
("Shsnando~n'L and $'ion Place, InC. (-z~an
~35,000.~30 of i~ re~nua bo~ at one
· e refi~g a~ ~ oulsan~ b~ O~ apo~ma[my
SI,70U,~O an a mon~g~ b~ ~ Un~
of Ho~g ~ ur~n Oe~pm~t ['H~
~d~nl~ u~ ~ ~ L~er C~e~, I~d at
S~st New Ma~t, V~ ~ ~ ~e
g~ lo ~e ~em o[ ~ bands,
mn~ ~ ~n l~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~
Certificate .' of
Publication
We hereby certify t. hat the attached publication
was inserted in regular editions of The
Northern Virginia Daily, published at
Strasburg, Virginia, the first insertion being on
the 2!st day of December ,2001, and
subsequent insertions on Decerabev 28
20Ol .
Given under my hand this
D~cember , 2001
28th day of
Shenandoah Publishing House, Inc.
TotaI charge for advertising $
+ $12 certificate of publication charge
County of Shenandoah
State of Virg2~a
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
~d^ day of ¢~t'~o-,~/~ / , 20_Od.
Public
My commission expires, March 31, 2004.
[.~l.011C£ OF'i~UBUC I~AARINGLOI.'PROPOSE~
[f~R, EVENUE' BOND PF.A#tOElqNANCI#O~BY
I~' 2~5.1N!IUSTRIALDEVELOPMEaT AU1110~ 017~
~hen~d~'~)~nd.~dff Pl~e,'
b~ds ~'one ~me or ff~ time ~me td('~sJst ~e
Bo~wem in ~cing ~ ~nanc ng ~e r-plan of
financJng'~r ~e following (cell~vely;."Pmj~): (1)
· e acquisWon, ~sion, con~u~on and bquJpping
by.~C ~ a ~ide~ c~ ~il~ for ~e aged Cur-
mn~'~ining 75 msidend~ un~s' kn~wn-
B~cM~ds. Village locked ~ 1300 B~chlandS D~e
Chad~sville, Virginia 2290~ in the 'C~ of
· b~e, ~inia ~e e~sion of whlch, facil~ will
inc[ud~q acquis~on of an ~p~mately t acm ~amel
of I~O aejacent to ~e ~sflng facil~ and'~e con-
~c~on of ~ ~dWon~' 86 Yeside~a[ un~; (2)
mfin~ciflg'~ an o~nding b~ance of.appro~e~
$1,700,000 on a ~o~age loan by ~e Un,ed S~es
Depar~ent of Housing and Urban Development
("HUD") to Shenandoah, ~e proceeds of' which
Shenandoah used ~ finance'~S constru~on of a
income ~Jde~-c~ faci[~ for ~e aged containing
39 mside~al un~ ~wn 'as L~er Cm~, located' ~
9138 Congress S~e~, New M~, Virginia 228~
· e Coun~ of Shenandoah; VirgJfl[~ (3) ~e refinancing
of an o~ndin9 balance of approximately $4,200,000
on a mo~gage loan by HUD to Z~on Place, ~e proceeds
of which ~on Place used.~
a Zow-income residential ~ facil~ for ~e aged con-
~ining 123 reside~al un~ ~own as L~her Manoc
located ~ 350 M~ibu D~e, ~rgJnia Beach, Virginia
23452 in ~e C~ of Vi~in[a Beach, Virginia (4) rela~d
and rou~ne cap~ expend~res of ~e Bo~owem; and
(5) amou~ required for rose,es, working cap,al, cap-
~ized in,mst ~d cos~ of issuance in connec~on
w~ ~e foregoing..
-The issuance of ~enue bonds as reque~ed by.
Borrowem will not cons~e a debt or pledge of ~e
fa~ ~d cmd~ of ~e Commonwea~h of ~rginia or
Coun~ of Albem~e, Vi~in~, and ne~her ~e ~and
cred~ nor ~e ~ing power of ~e Commenwea~h of
~rginia or any poi~cal .subdivision ~ereof will be
pledged to ~e payment'of such bonds. - .-
The public hearing, which may be continued or
adjournS, will be held at 4:30 o'clock p.m. on'J~ua~
9, 2002, before ~e A~o~, in Room 235, on ~e'2nd
floor of ~e Coun~ O~ce Building, 401 McinUre Road,
Chad~esviile, Vi~inia 22901. A~
~e issu~ce of ~e bonds or ~e Iocadon ~ nacre of
· e proposed project may appe~ at ~e he~ng and
prese~ his or her views. ]nfo~ation tug,ding ~e
Bormwem'.appli~n ~ on file and is open for inspec-
tion at ~e A~o~'s office at 401 MclntJre Road.
Chado~esville, ~inia 22901 dudng business bourn.
Indu~al Development A~ho~
~ Albem~e Coup, Virginia 9mo7
T~E VIRGINIAN-pILOT
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
The Virginian-Pilot
MCGUIRE WOODS LLP
901 EAST CARY STREET
ONE JAMES CENTER
RICHMOND VA 23219
REFERENCE: 10165384
1142239
State of Virginia
City of Norfolk
Albemarle Co
NOTICE OF PUBLIC ~LEA
This day, D. Johnson personally appeared before me
and after being duly sworn, made oath that:
1) She is affidavit clerk of The Virginian-Pilot,
a newspaper published by Landmark Communications
Inc., in the cities of Norfolk, Portsmouth,
Chesapeake, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach, Common-
wealth of Virginia and in the state of North
Carolina 2)That the advertisement hereto annexed
has been published in said newspaper on the date
stated.
~:'~I~DUSTRfAL Db'VE~OPMENZ AUTHORITY OF~
NOUC~ is hereby gNen ~ the Industrial DeveiopmeM A~od~ of
~Al~e Count, ~ni~ ("Author~") will hold A public headng on
Ithe appllcaUon of Vi~inia L~hemn Ho~emCharlo~esville, LLC.
~and Zion P{ace, Inc. (~ion Pl~e"}; all ~ wh~h are affili~es of Vi~3
~gin~ ~emn Hom~ [~; (colle~vely, "Bo~em-), mqu~i~ the
I AuthofiH to issue on ~r ~half up to-$35,000,000 of i~ ~nue
~bonds at one Brae or ~m time to time.to assist ~e Bo~wem
~fi~ or mfinancing~r p~n~ fin~cing ~r ~e following (~-
~fively, '~je~"}: (1~ ~e acquis~ion, exoansion, constmct~n
[ ~uip~ng by V~C of a ms~tial care ~cili~ for ~e ag~ cu~ent y
confining 75 resident units ~own'as 8mnchlands Village
~ 1300 Bmnchiands D~ve. Charlo~e~ille, Vi~in a 22901 n the
Coun~ of Albemarle Virginia the expansi~ of'which ~ciliW wi I
mcgee ~e acqui~tion of an approximately i abm pa~i of land ~j~
cen~ to,he exi~ing ~ci/i~ and the constm~on ~ an additional 86
residential unAs; {2) the r~nancing of an outstanding'balance of
approximately $1.700.000 on a mo~gag~loan by ~e Unit~ S~t~
Depa~ment ~ Housing and U~an De~lopme~ ("HUD") ~ Shenam
doah. ~e proc~ds of which Shenandoa~ us~ te finance its cons~c-
Bon of a l~income ms~at ~re ~c~li~ ~r the ag~ ~ining 39
residential un~s known as Luther Crest. ~oca~ed at 9138 Congress
S~eet. New Ma~e~ Vi~inia 22~ in the CounW of Shenandoah, Vir-
~nia; (3) the refinancing of an oa~tanding balance of appm~mately
~,2~.~ on a mo~e Ioa~ by HUD to ~on Pla~ ~ ~ of
~enaal care facili~ ~r ~e ag~ confining !23 reside~al units known
as L~her Manor. [o~ed at 350 Maiibu DrNe, Vi~inia Beach, Vi~r~ia
23452 in ;he Ci~ of V~rg;ma Beach, ~inia: (4) related and ro~ine
conn~fion ~ ~e forgoing.
constitute a debt or pJeOge of the faith and credit of the Commo~
weat~ of Virginia or the Ccun~ of A[bemade. Virginia, and ne~t~er
faith and cr~it nor the ~x;ng po~r of ~e Commonwealth of
or any political subdivision thereof wil~ be pledged to the pa~ent of
s~h ~o~s.
'~e o~lic hearing, ~ich may be ~ntinu~ or adjournS. ~ll be held
at 4:30 o'clock p.m. on :anua~ 9, 2002, ~fore the Authori~,
Room 235. o~ ~he 2nd floo~ of the CoUA~ Office Building, 401 Mcl~
fi~ R~d, Chado~a~ile. ~inia 22901. A~ ~mon i~erest~ in the
may appear at ~e hearing and present his or her ~e~. Info. at,on
oon at ~e A~ori~'s office a~ 401 Mcl~fire Roac. ChaHo~esville. Vir-
gila ~1 dudng business bourn.
Indu~al D~elopment AuthoH~
~ O~m~ 21 and ~m~r 28. 2001 114~39
PUBLISHED ON: 12/21 12/28
TOTAL COST: 763.28 AD SPACE: 116 LINE
FILED ON: 12/28 / 0 ~_ _~_ ~_~2:
Subscr~d sworn to bef/re,~_~me in my city and scare on the day and year
03 y ;o is ion e×p re January 31, 200 .
EXItlBIT B
Summary of Statements
No one appeared in opposition to the proposed bond issue.
EXHIBIT C
RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
OF THE ISSUANCE OF UP TO $35,000,000 REVENUE BONDS
FOR THE BENEFIT OF VIRGINIA LUTHERAN HOMES-
CHARLOTTESVILLE, L.L.C., SHENANDOAH VALLEY LUTHERAN
HOUSING, INC., AND ZION PLACE, INC., &LL OF WHICH ARE AFFILIATES
OF VIRGINIA LUTHERAN HOMES, INC.
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia
("Authority"), adopted a resolution of inducement on November 13~ 2001 for the benefit
of Virginia Lutheran Homes-Charlottesville, L.L.C. ("VLHC"), Shenandoah Valley
Lutheran Housing, Inc. ("Shenandoah"), and Zion Place, Inc., ("Zion Place"), ail
501(c)(3) organizations organized or incorporated in Virginia which are affihates of
Virginia Lutheran Homes, Inc., a Virginia non-stock, non-profit corporation (collectively,
the "Borrowers");
WHEREAS, such inducement resolution related to the proposed issuance of up to
$35,000,000 revenue bonds at one time or from time to time to assist 'the Borrowers in
financing or refinancing their plan of financing for the following (collectively, "Project"):
(1) the acquisition, expansion, construction and equipping by VLHC of a residential care
facility for the aged currently containing 75 residential units known as Branchlands
Village located at'1300 Branchlands Drive, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 in the County
of Albemarle, Virginia, the expansion of which facility will include the acquisition of an
approximately 1 acre parcel of land adjacent to the existing facility and the construction
of an additional 86 residential units; (2) the refinancing of an outstanding balance of
approximately $1,700,000 on a mortgage loan by the United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") to Shenandoah, the proceeds of which
Shenandoah used to finance its construction of a low-income residential care facility for
the aged containing 39 residential units known as Luther Crest, located at 9138 Congress
Street, New Market, Virginia 22844 in the County of Shenandoah, Virginia; (3) the
refinancing of an outstanding balance of approximately $4,200,000 on a mortgage loan
by HUD to Zion Place, the proceeds of which Zion Place used to finance its construction
of a low-income residential care facility for the aged containing 123 residential units
known as Luther Manor, located at 350 Mahbu Drive, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 in
the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia; (4) related and routine capital expenditures of the
Borrowers; and (5) amounts required for reserves, working capital, capitalized interest
and costs of issuance in connection with the foregoing;
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
requires that a public hearing be held before the issuance of the proposed bonds; and
WHEREAS, for the purpose of remedying an error in publication of the notices
for the public hearing held on November 13, 2001, a public hearing has been held on
January 9, 2002 on the Project and the proposed bond issue, and the Authority desires to
\\FIN\82371.1.
recommend approval of the Project and the Proposed bond issue to the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The resolution of inducement adopted by the Authority for the benefit of the
Borrowers and relating to the Project is ratified, reaffirmed and readopted in all respects.
2. The Authority recOmmends approval of the Project and the proposed bond
issue by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adOption.
Adopted this 9th day of January, 2002.
[SEAL]
Secretary, Industrial I~/elopmefft Authority
of Albemarle County, Virginia
-2-
To the Board o£ Supervisors
of the County o£Albemarle, Virginia
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR PROPOSED BOND FINANCING
Date: January 9, 2002
Applicant:
Facility:
Virginia Lutheran Homes-Charlottesville, L.L.C. ("VLHC"), Shenandoah Valley Lutheran Housing,
Inc. ("Shenandoah") and Zion Place, Inc. ("Zion Place"), all affiliates of Virginia Lutheran Homes, Inc.
Financing/refinancing residential care facilities for the aged, capital improvements and additions
$35,000,000
VLHC Shenandoah
2. Estimamd taxable value of the facility's real $8,500,000 N/A
property to be constmctedinthelocality.*
Maximum amount of financing sought.
3. Estimated real property tax per year using present $50,000 N/A
tax rates.
Zion Place
N/A
N/A
4. Estimated personal property tax per year using $5,000 N/A N/A
present tax rates.
5. Estimated merchants' capital tax per year using N/A N/A
present tax rates.
6. (a) Estimated dollar value per year of goods $110,000 $40,000
that will be purchased from Virginia
companies within the localitv.
N/A
$90,000
(b) Estimated dollar value per year of goods $1,000 $500 $1,000
that will be purchased from non-Virginia
companies within the locality. *
(c) Estimated dollar value per year of services $209,000 $54,000 $184,000
that will be purchased from Virginia
companies within the locality. *
(d) Estimated dollar value per year of services $41,000 $1,000 $1,000
that will be purchased from non-Virginia
companies, within the locality. *
7. Estimated number of regular employees on year 18 3
round basis.
15
County, Virginia
8. Average annual salary per employee. $17,400 $13,600
Ch~maa~, In3~fi'~'~l~/~fekS~men~t,~thority of Albemarle
* With respect to each facility, "in/within the locality" refers to the locality in which the facility is located.
$18,500
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
01-08-02A0C~ :25 RCVD
AGENDA TITLE:
Hillsdale Drive Bus Bench Agreement
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Install a CTS bus bench on County property at the
intersection of Hillsdale Drive and Incarnation Drive
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley,Davis, Cilimberg,Benish,Wade
AGENDA DATE:
January 16, 2002
ACTION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ITEM NUMBER:
IN FORMATION:
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY: .f,~4~~
BACKGROUND: /
Charlottesville Transit Service ICTS) has received a request from residents of Branchland Retirement Community to place
a bus bench at the existing bus stop located at the intersection of Hillsdale Drive and Incarnation Drive. CTS contacted
County staff and VDOT because this site is in the County. It was determined that the bench would not be in VDOT right-of
way, but would be located on County property.
DISCUSSION:
The County Attorney's Office has developed a license agreement between the City and County to allow this bench location
(attached). The City has signed this agreement. The purpose of the bench would be for the convenience of CTS bus
passengers in the Branchlands area. CTS wil use their resources to install and maintain the bench. There will be no cost
to the County to install or maintain this bench.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors give the County Executive authorization to sign the pus bench agreement.
01-08-02A09:43 RCVD
01.231
LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this ~ day of November, 2001 by and between
County of Albemarle, Virginia, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia,
hereinafter referred to as the "County," and the City of Charlottesville, Virginia, a political
subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter referred to as the"Citv"~,.
WHEREAS, the City, through the Charlottesville Transportation Service ("C TS"),
desires to locate a bus bench on County property at the intersection of Hillsdale Drive and
Incarnation Drive in the County for the convenienCe of CTS bus passengers in the Branchlands
area; and
WHEREAS, the County is willing to allow the CTS to use part of its property, for such a
purpose.
WITNESS:
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual premises stated herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement is to allow the CTS to install a bus bench on the
County'S property at the intersection of Hillsdale Drive and Incarnation Drive. The bench is for
the benefit of bus riders~
2. Premises: For the uses described in section 4 of this Agreement, the County hereby
licenses to CT S that part of the County's premises marked "Bus Bench," hereinafter referred to
as the "Premises" and shown on Attachment "A," which is attached hereto and made a part of
this Agreement.
3. Term: The term of this Agreement shall be one (1) year from the date hereof, and shall
automatically renew for an additional one (1) year term on the anniversary date. Either party,
however, may terminate this Agreement after three months by giving one month's notice to the
other party of its intent to terminate.
4. 'Uses of the Premises: CTS may use the premises for providing a bus bench for its
passengers.
5. Access: CTS and its passengers may use the County's property to get to and from the bus
bench.
6. Prior Approval of Bus Bench Installation: CTS shall obtain the County's written approval
before placing the bus bench on the premises. The County's Director of the Department of
Planning and Community Development, or his designee, shall be author/zed to approve the bus
bench. This approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
7. Maintenance: CTS shall be solely responsible for the maintenance of the bus bench and
the Premises, and they shall be maintained in a safe condition at all times.
8. Liability: The City agrees to name the County to its general liability insurance policy as
an additional insured for the CTS's operation of the bus bench on the County's property. The
City shall provide the County a writing showing that it has been so added to the City's general
liability insurance policy within five (5) days of the County's execution of this Agreement.
9. Title, Access and Authority: The County covenants and warrants to the City that it
presently owns the fee simple interest in and to the Premises; that the County is duly authorized
and empowered to grant this License; and that the person executing this license on behalf of the
County warrants himself to be duly authorized to bind the County hereto.
10. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
and supercedes any prior understandings or oral or written agreements between the parties
respecting the within subject matter.
11. Modifications: This Agreement may not be modified, except in a writing signed by the
parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto bind themselves to this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
Title:
Approved as to form:
City Atttf~tey
Approved as to form:
C~nty(~ttpeyl/
COUNt, ALBEMARI_tE, VIRC~INIA
Titlel ~ ~.)t'x'~ ~x~ ~-~"~ ~~__~'
I
~&/07/01 ~ED 09:~6 FAX ~04 6i$ 0551
VJ{L INSURANCE ~JO02
Irlsurar~ ce
Pro§r~ms
VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL LIABILITY POOL
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
5~-HVICE AGENT '"
This Certificate ia issued as a matter oi information only and confers no rights upon the Certificate
VML Insurance Programs Holder. This Cetg, t'icate does not amend, extend or alter the Membership Agreement afforded by the'
P.O. Box 12164 policies below, nor guarantees the solvency of the Virginia Municipal Llabii.lty Pool.
Richmond, VA 25241
MEMBF. R
City of Charlottesville
PO BOX 911
ChaHottesviile, VA 22902
COVERAGES
This is tO certify that tube coverage listed below has been issued to the Member named above for the policy period indicated, notwithstanding
any requirement, term or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this Certlflca[e may be issued or may pertain, the
coverage afforded by the policies described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of the. Member Agreement. Limits
shown may have been reduced by paid clelms.
TYPE OF GOVEP, AGE .MEMBER EFF, EXP. DATE LIMITS OF COVERAGE
NUMBER DATE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT '- ...... Eac~ OccUrrence $1,000,000
LIABIUTY '. vMLPLGL000520 07101/01 07/01102
· Damages to Premises Rented to You $100,000
ix] General Liability, PUblic Medical Expense-Any One Person $10.000
Officials, Law Enforcement
Liability
(Occurrence)
AUTOMC~'~ILE LIAI~iLiTY
VMLPAL000 07/01/01 07/01./02 $'1,000,000 Combined Single Limit
r } Any Au~
[ ] All Owned Autos
[] $cheduJed Autos
[ ] Hired Autos
[ ] Nor~-Owned Autos
[]
EXCESS LIABILITY
VMLPEX000520 D7/01101 D7/01102 Each Occurrence $10,000,000
'.[X]
UNINSURED MoToRIsT8 .............
VMLPUM000 07/01/01 07/01/02 $25,000/$50,000/$20,000
[]
AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE
VMLPAP000 07/01/01 07/01/02 ,SYMBOL DEDUCT,]B,LE
[ ] Collision' 7
[ } Com0rehensive
OESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSJRE51P{I~TIONS/SPECIAL TERMS 7 _,,
RE: Evidence of Coverage for transit bench on Hillsc~ale Drive, Albemarle County is named as additional insured, '
Ct=I~TIF['cATE HOLDER CANCELLATION: Should the above described MemberAgreement be cancelled before the expiration
date thereof, the Virginia Municipal Liability Pool will endeavor to mall written notice within 30 days to
Albemarle County the Certificate Holder named :o the left, but failure to mail suoh notice shall Impose no obligation of any
kind upon the V'~inia Municipal Liability Pool, its agents or representatives.
& AUTHOBIZED REPRESENT,~TIVE
...... Judi~;h L. Halcher
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Zoning Text Amendment Policy for Public Requests
SU BJ ECT/PROPOSAL/REQU EST:
Board of Supervisor's adoption of policy for the review of
public requests for Zoning Text Amend ments.
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Tucker, Foley, Kamptner, Cilimberg, McCulley, Benish
AGENDA DATE:
January 16, 2002
ACTION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ITEM NUMBER:
INFORMATION:
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
Attached is a newly drafted policy for the submittal and review of public requests for Zoning Text Amendments (ZTA's).
Establishing this policy is part of the County's on-going effort to improve the efficiency and understanding of development
review processes and enhance customer service by providing clearly written policies and procedures for these processes.
There has never been a written and adopted policy regarding the processing of public requests for ZTA's.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed policy is similar to the practice currently used to review ZTA's. The primary differences are:
The proposed policy establishes, and more clearly defines, the steps in the review process. Step 1 is the Commission's
action to adopt a resolution of intent to amend the Ordinance. Step 2 is the rewew of the actual text amendment language
for action.
The review schedule is modified to establish a date for action on the P, esolution of Intent only (Step 1). Once a resolution
of intent is adopted, the County staff will set the appropriate priority and schedule for the review of the applicant-requested
amendment based on its importance relative to other public and County initiated text amendments. Under the prior
schedule, dates were set for the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors' public hearings, but they were often not
realistic considering the scale and scope of some of the ZTA's.
· The new policy more clearly establishes the criteria used for reviewing ZTA's and the information the applicant needs to
provide to support the request.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the adoption of the attached Policy for Submittal of Pro posed Amend ments to the Zoning Ordinance.
07-08-02P05:21 RCVD
02.005
POLICY FOR SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Application for a Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA), made by citizens, may be submitted four (4) times
annually. The Planning Commission or the Board of Supervisors may initiate a ZTA at any time
deemed appropriate by adoption of a resolution of intent to amend the ordinance. Prior to the
submittal of an application, a preliminary conference shall be held with Planning and Zoning
Department staff to discuss the proposal.
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment applications shall be filed at the Department of Building Code
and Zoning Services. The application shall be accompanied by cash or check made payable to the
"County of Albemarle, Virginia," in the amount of six hundred and sixty-five dollarS ($665.00).
Procedures for amending the Zoning Ordinance are found in Chapter 18, Section 33 of the
Ordinance. General procedures for processing ZTA are provided in Attachment A. In general, ZTA
applications made by the public follow a two step process for review.
Step I - Upon submittal of the amendment request, the Planning and Zoning Staff (and other
Departments/agencies, as necessary) will review the request for its merits and consistency with the
review criteria identified below. Upon completion of this initial evaluation, staff will recommend to the
Planning Commission whether to proceed with development of an amendment to the ordinance. The
Commission may choose to move fonNard with a text amendment or deny the request for an
amendment. Should the Commission approve moving forward with an amendment, it will do so by
adopting a resolution of intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance. This resolution establishes the scope
of the amendment to be considered for adoption. The Commission's action may vary from the
applicant's amendment request, but will reflect what the Commission deems to be the appropriate
amendment to address the general public interest (i.e., public necessity, health, safety, convenience,
general welfare, good zoning practices, and the aesthetic values and priorities of the public). Upon
adoption of the resolution of intent to amend the ordinance, the method to address the issues
identified by the resolution, and the priority for completing such work, shall be established by the
County based onthe proposal's relationship to other text amendments and other work priorities as
established by the County and managed by the Zoning Text Amendment Team. This team includes
the Director of Planning and Community Development, Zoning Administrator, and County Attorney.
Please note that approval of a resolution of intent to amend the Ordinance does not insure ultimate
approval of a text amendment----only that a text amendment will be studied and drafted for further
consideration.
Within ninety days after the application deadline for a citizen requested amendment, the Planning
Commission shall take action on whether to proceed forward with a resolution of intent to amend the
Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Supervisors shall receive notice of the Planning Commission's
action on the applicant's request for amendment and, at its discretion, choose to act on the request.
Step 2 -- Once the Commission has adopted a resolution of intent, staff will further evaluate the
proposed request and develop text amendment language for consideration by the Planning
Commission. A public hearing will be held by the Commission to receive public comment. The
Commission will recommend an action to the Board of Supervisors. The Board will hold a public
hearing and act on the amendment. For any given application, staff may use additional public input
opportunities and Planning Commission work sessions in developing the text amendment language.
This request will be reviewed based on its merits and consistency with the following criteria and make
a positive finding. It shall be the responsibility of the citizen requesting a Zoning Text Amendment to
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Corville Farm Road - Rural Addition Request
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Adopt a resolution requesting VDOT accept Corville
Farm Road into the State Secondary System of
Highways and construct improvements under the Rural
Additions Program
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Kamptner, Graham, Kelsey
AGENDA DATE:
January 16, 2002
ACTION:
CONSENT AGEN DA:
ITEM NUMBER:
INFORMATION:
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWED BY:
Resolution, Location Map, and
Memo dated 11-21-01
BACKGROUND:
Corville Farm Road is located off Greenwood Road (St. Rte. 691) approximately 0.1 miles north of the Greenwood
Community Center (see attached map). Public road plans for Corville Farm Road were approved and the road was
constructed in early 1970's. In 1977 the county engineer and VDOT determined the road was complete and the road
bond was released. On 10 August 1977 the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution requesting VDOT to accept
Corville Farm Road into the state system. At that point all work and documentation had been complete. However, the
acceptance process could not be finalized until the owner/developer paid the VDOT maintenance fee and posted a
performance bond with VDOT.
Despite reminders from the county engineer, the owner/developer did not complete this final step. In May 1979 the
road was reinspected by VDOT. The owner/developer was informed that due to his delay, corrective work was now
necessary before the road could be accepted into the state system. The work was not completed and on 9 January
1983 the owner/developer died. Completion of the corrective work and acceptance of the road were not pursued by
the owner/developer's successor. Twenty-two years of weather, wear and no maintenance have taken their toll. As
a result, the road surface, shoulders, and drainage system are in a severe state of disrepair.
DISCUSSION:
Corville Farm Road is eligible for state acceptance and improvement as a Rural Addition project per Code of Virginia
Sec. 33.1-72.1 (D), which provides that 100% of the road 'mprovement cost may be funded from the available Secondary
Road Improvement funds, provided that the County guarantees clear and unrestricted right-of-way and any necessary
easements for cuts, fills and drainage. Use of Rural Addition funds is limited to the engineering & construction costs
of any road improvements necessary for the road to comply with state standards. The funds may not be used for
acquisition of right-of-way, easements, or for the relocation of utilities, structures, and other improvements from the
public right-of-way. The Engineering Department has estimated a construction budget of $150,000 for the road
improvements. To guarantee clear and unrestricted right-of-way and easements, the County must first obtain an asbuilt
survey of the road. The County must then remove/relocate any structures, lot improvements, and above ground utilities
from the right-of-way; obtain the necessary permits for underground utilities within the right-of-way; and, assure and/or
provide drainage easements over all structures and drainage channels from the right-of-way to a natural watercourse.
Although drainage easements were recorded with the subdivision, staff observed drainage improvements that did not
appear to be within the easements. The County will need to plat and record any new drainage easements. The
Engineering Department has estimated a budget of $10,000 for these items not funded by the Rural Addition Program.
01-11-02Al1:02 RCVD
AGENDA TITLE: Corville Farm Road - Rural Addition Request
DATE: January 16, 2002
Page 2 of 2
As a note of clarification, funds for Rural Addition projects do not come from a separate funding source. However, State
Code does specifically allow a portion of the secondary road allocation to be used for Rural Additions, if the Board
chooses. These projects must compete for funding priority along with the proposed improvements to our existing
secondary roads listed in th e "Albemarle County Priority List For Secondary Road Improvements" (alias the "6 - Year
Plan") and approved by the Board of Supervisors. This project would need to be added to that list and the funding
prioritized.
Lastly, a recommendation for road acceptance as a Rural Addition requires that the Board find that neither the original
developer nor any successor developers retain a speculative interest in property abutting the road. The Engineering
Department has researched this matter and concluded that there is no speculative interest along Corville Farm Road
(refer to page 2 of the attached memo).
Staff is in the process of assessing Corville Farm Road according to the County's criteria for Rural Additions. Assuming
the Board decides to proceed with this road as a Rural Addition project, this criteria will provide a basis for the Board's
consideration of where to place it in.the County's Six Year Secondary Road Pdodty List. The Department of Engineering
and Public Works estimates that it will take approximately a year to be able to guarantee an unrestricted right-of-way
and any necessary easement for cuts, fills and drainage.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached resolution recommending VDOT accept Corville Farm Road into the State Secondary
System of Highways and construct improvements under the Rural Additions Program
Direct the Department of Engineering & Public Works to obtain the necessary asbuilt survey and drainage
easement plats.
3. Authorize the County Executive to execute the drainage easement plats.
02.006
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THAT CORVILLE FARM ROAD BE TAKEN INTO THE
SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS AS A RURAL ADDITION
WHEREAS, Corville Farm Road, described in more detail below, was established in 1971 and
currently serves at least three families per mile; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed that Albemarle County's
Subdivision Ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways pursuant to Virginia
Code § 33.1-72.1; and
WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting Corville Farm Road, the Board
finds that neither the odginal developer or developers nor any successor developers retain a speculative
interest in property abutting Corville Farm Road.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
requests that Corville Farm Road be added to the secondary system of state highways pursuant to
Virginia Code § 33.1-72.1(D), as such road is more particularly described as follows:
Name of Street: Corville Farm Road Length: 0.25 miles
From: Greenwood Road - State Route 691
To: The terminus at the culdesac
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet
Plat Recorded: Date: 01 July 1970 Deed Book: 474
Date: 23 December 1971 Deed Book: 499
Page: 009
Page: 376
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described above, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation
to improve Corville Farm Road to the prescribed minimum standards and to fund these improvements
pursuant to Virginia Code § 33.1-72.1(D).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a Resolution
duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County'by vote of 6 to 0, as recorded below, at a
meeting held on January 16, 2002 ~& ~x~)~~.~
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors }
Mr. Bowerman
Mr. Dorrier x
Ms. Humphds x
Mr. Martin x
Mr. Perkins x
Ms. Thomas x
Aye Nay
X
Corville Farm Road
Greenwood
Community Center
Monterey Farm
GREENWOOD
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering & Public Works
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mark Graham, PE - Director of Engineering ~Pub~lic Works
Jack M. Kelsey, PE-ChiefofEngineeri~~/_~
21 November ~001 ~ '9 ~-"
Corville Farm Road Rural Addition Qualificah"Gn
In the paragraphs that follow I have summarized the eligibility of Corville Farm road as a Rural
Addition to the S~te System of State Highways and the projectstatus. Based on this information
I recommend that we proceed to 1) obtain a current quote and process' a contract to provide an
asbuilt survey and drainage easement plats (as needed); and 2) draft a resolution and an executive
summary for County Attorney review. Please read this summary and let me know ifI should
proceed in this manner.
Rural Additions Policy
Rural Additions to the State System of State Highways must meet the minimum standards of the
Rural Additions Policy, adopted by the Commonwealth Transportation Board. In general, these
streets must have a 40' min. fight-of-way width, all necessary drainage easements, determination
........................... thai rio-"spedfii~ifiVe ]-fi~-~est" '~sts;, and-th~:~edffi~pi~ved-as needdd~: ine~f ~DOT-~an-dards~'-'-~--~,'~: ........ ~-~
Corville Farm subdivision was created in 1969/1971 with a 50 ft. right-of-way dedicated to
public use. Corville Farm Road was constructed and opened to public use prior to 1 July 1983.
As such,' the road may be eligible for Rural Addition based the Code of Virginia, Sec. 33.1-
72.1(C) or Sec. 33.1-72.1(D).
Street acceptance requested per Sec. 33.1-72.1 (C) provides that 50% of the road improvement
cost may be funded from the available VDOT Secondary Road Improvement funds allocated to
Albemarle County. The County must agree to pay the remaining 50% from either County
revenue or from a special assessment of the landowners on the street. Street acceptance
requested per Sec. 33.1-72.1(D) provides that 100% of the road improvement cost may be funded
from the available Secondary Road Improvement funds.
The VDOT funds utilized for Rural Additions are restricted to the engineering & construction of
the road improvements. The funds may not be used for acquisition of right-of-way, easements,
or for the relocation of utilities, structures, and other improvements from the public fight-of-way.
Mark Graham
21 November, 2001
Page 2 of 3
Lastly, as a word of caution, Rural Addition projects must compete for funding priority along
with all the proposed improvements to existing secondary roads that are listed in the "Albemarle
County Priority List For Secondary Road Improvements" (alias the "6 - Year Plan") and
approved by the Board of Supervisors.
Speculative Interest
The Rural Addition Policy requires that the Board of Supervisors determine that there is no
speculative interest prior to submitting a request for Rural Addition. Documentation supporting
this determination must be submitted with the request for VDOT review. "Speculative Interest"
is deemed to be retained if the original developer(s) or successor developers have ownership or
partnership in two or more parcels, or equivalent frontage abutting the street(s).
Mr. H.H. Tiffany-was the original owner/developer of the Corville Farm subdivision as well as
the owner of the adjacent 260 acre Monterey Farm (TMP 55-12) that has access to Corville Farm
Road. After his death on 9 January 1983, the lands were willed to his wife Ms. Patsy O. Tiffany.
All of the lots in Corville Farm subdivision have been developed and are in private ownership.
The adjacent Monterey Farm was sold to Mr. Joesph Casero on 17 December 1987 and has been
under a "Land Use" designation since 1989.
Monterey Farm has approximately 1200 feet of frontage on Greenwood Road (St. Rte. 691) and
has access to Corville Farm Road via a 53 ft. frontage on the northeast quadrant of the culdesac.
The lots in Corville Farm subdivision have an average frontage of 105 feet. The "equivalent
~ontag._e..'_'., refe_rr_ed to.~._th_e__de_fini..t/_'.on, of_speculafive in_t.~est, ~_ou!d be2_.05 feet or l~ger - nearly
4 t~es larger thhn-th~ M~h~erey F--arm frorit'/~'bh-~b~-i~ Farm Road.' ":~ .......... ~ ~-~- - ...................
VDOT had expressed some concern over the private water system and its possible link to
speculative interest. The Corville Farm subdivision is served by a central water system that is
operated by a private water company. The community wells for this system are located on
Monterey Farm. Mr. Joesph Casero, owner of Monterey Farm, also is the owner of the private
water company. Although under the same ownership, the central water system's approval and
capacity is limited to the lots in the Corville Farm subdivision.
Based on my research, neither the developer nor successor developers have ownership or
partnership in the Corville subdivision. A large tract of land that has access to CorV/lle Farm
Road (originally owned by the developer) is under private ownership, has been in "Land Use"
since 1989, and does not have "equivalent frontage" on Corville Farm Road. Lastly, the private
water system was approved and has capacity to only serve Corville Farm. It's my conclusion
that there is no speculative interest along Corville Farm Road.
Mark Graham
21 November, 2001
Page 3 of 3
Status/Recommendation
Based on the Rural Addition Policy, the County will be responsible to: remove/relocate
structures, lot improvements, and above ground utilities from the public right-of-way; obtain the
necessary permits for underground utilities within the public right-of-way; and, assure and/or
provide drainage easements over all structures and drainage channels from the public right-of-
way to a natural watercourse.
We have no information on what or where utilities were installed, or how the existing lot and
drainage improvements relate to the right-of-way, property lines and easements. Therefore, we
need to procure consultant services to provide an asbuilt survey of the road. The survey will
locate/document: underground utilities (water, electric, telephone & cable); property comers
along road frontage; any structures and/or improvements within the right-of-way that will need to
be removed; drainage pipes/structures and confirm the locations of existing or new drainage
easements dedicated to public use. Services will also include preparation of easement plats
where necessary. I anticipate these services will cost approximately $5000.00, based on an
earlier quote for these serv/ces.
Lastly, in accordance with the Rural Addition Policy, the Rural Addition must be requested by
resolution of the Board of Supervisors.
File: corville summary memo.doc
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Request to Transfer Funds for the Child Safety Seat Program
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Request to transfer donation funds from General Fund to
Fire & Rescue Division
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Pumphrey, Breeden
AGENDA DATE:
January 16, 2002
ACTION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ITEM NUMBER:
INFORMATION:
ACTION: × INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND:
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWED BY:
In 1998 an account was established for donations received by the Fire & Rescue Division for services rendered to our
residents/public.
DISCUSSION:
In February of 1998, the County's career fire and rescue staff began to inspect and install child safety seats at three volunteer
fire stations; Earlysville, Stony Point, and Seminole Trail. It was a first for this area. In the beginning, each member of the staff
attended an 8-hour course in child safety seat installation. Through a more extensive training course certified by the National
Highway Traffic Safety Association (NHTSA) and the American Automobile Association (AAA), eleven of our personnel are
now trained to teach child safety seat installation to the public. Staff currently inspects roughly 250 seats per month, of which
about 98% are installed incorrectly.
In the past couple of months the Fire/Rescue Division has joined forces with other area agencies, including the University of
Virginia Health Services, Albemarle County Police Department, University of Virginia Police Department, Virginia State Police,
State Farm Insurance, Kiwanis Club, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, K-mart, and Albemarle County Vehicle
Maintenance Services. With the growth of the number of agencies having staff trained as Child Safety Seat Technicians, we
would ike to "take the program on the road" to the outlying areas in the County. In order to do this, we would like to purchase
an 18-foot enclosed trailer to house tables, chairs, tents, child seats, and other supplies needed to conduct a remote safety
seat checkpoint.
Th e Department of Fire/Rescue has received donations as a result of previous installations and from several of the above
named agencies and is requesting approval to obtain and equip the 18-foot trailer using these donated funds. (Trailer $ 7,440,
lettering and decals $ 2,000, supplies $ 3,560). The total estimated cost of this project is $13,000.00.
Staff requests the transfer of $13,000 from the County's General Fund to a Fire & Rescue account to be designated for the
Car Seat Safety Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the identified needs for Child Seat Safety supplies and materials, staff recommends that $13,000 be transferred into
the Fire Rescue Division operational budget code (1-1000-32015- 561415).
02.002
01-08-02P05:21 RCVD
Form. 3
7/25/86
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
County TEA 21 Enhancement Grant Application
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Board approval of a request to apply for TEA 21 Enhancement
Grant funds for the construction of the Downtown Crozet
Streetscape project, along Crozet Avenue and Three Notched
Road, from Tabor Street to just past the Crozet Library.
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Cilimber9, Benish, Wade
AGENDA DATE:
January 16, 2001
ACTION: X
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
ITEM NUMBER:
IN FORMATION:
INFORMATION:
At its October 3, 2001 meeting, the Board of Supervisors reviewed a list of possible grant projects and endorsed moving
forward with the Crozet streetscape project. In order to apply for grant funds, the Board must hold a public hearing and
endorse a resolution indicating support for this proj'ect and willingness to pay 20 percent of the total project cost. There is
no other grant request from the County. Attachment A is a resolution of intent which needs to be adopted by the Board of
Supervisors should it choose to move forward with the grant applicant.
DISCUSSION:
The grant proposal is for road and streetscape improvements along Crozet Avenue and Three Notched Road from Tabor
Street to just beyond the Library in downtown Crozet. These improvements are recommended in the County's Land Use
Plan and in the Crozet Community Study. The grant proposal is still under development, but will incorporate
improvements consistent with the recommendations for the Crozet Community Plan and recently completed Crozet
Sidewalk Study. Attachment B is a description of the improvements recommended in the Sidewalk Study, which form the
basis for the improvements proposed in the grant proposal.
The grant proposal calls for a multi-phased (multi-year) project with a total estimated cost of $2.93 million (requiring a
match of $586,000). The first phase of the project includes the design and engineering of the overall project, installation
of sidewalks and crosswalks from under the railroad underpass to just past the library, and the relocation/undergrounding
of overhead utility lines within a large portion of the project area. This first phase of the project is estimated to cost $1.32
million and will require a match of $265,000. The second phase of the project will include completing the undergrounding
of utilities, upgrading the road cross-section (curb/gutter), and installing sidewalks, crosswalks, landscaping, plazas and
street fixtures (streetlights, furniture, informational and historically interpretive signage) for the remainder of the project
area (Tabor Street to the railroad). Also included within the total project scope is the planning and design for a central
parking area to serve downtown. The County has programmed $550,000 for FY 2002/03 in the Capital Improvement
Program for Crozet sidewalk and streetscape improvements, which wil be adequate to cover the anticipated match
amount for the first year of the project and all but $30,000 of the total project match. The additional match amount can be
budgeted in future fiscal years of the CIP.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors endorse the attached resolution to apply for a TEA21 Enhancement Grant for
the Downtown Crozet streetscape improvement project.
02.004
01-09-02At0:05 RCVD
PROJECT ENDORSEMENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation
procedure for TEA-21 Enhancement Grant application, it is necessary that a request by resolution
be received from the local government or state agency in order for the Virginia Department of
Transportation to approve an enhancement project in the County of Albemarle.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, does hereby request the Commonwealth Transportation Board to fund the Crozet
Downtown Streetscape Project.
BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to pay 20 percent
of the total cost of this project, and that if the County of Albemarle subsequently elects to cancel
this project, it hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total
amount of the cost expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of
such cancellation.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby, certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a
Project Endorsement Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County
by vote of 6 to 0, as recorded below, at a meeting held on January 16, 2002.
Clerk, oard of County Supe~
Crozet- Downtown Sidewalk and Parking Study
'ATTACHMENT B
CROZET A VENUE TO THE SQUARE
This area is visually and functionally Crozet's Main Street. It provides vehicular
and pedestrian access between the commercial and residential areas and is the
heaviest traveled route for vehicles passing through Crozet. The west edge of the
street is well defined with concrete curb and concrete sidewalks running between
Jarman's Gap Road and the Square. There are mm lanes in front of the Blue
Goose Building and the new Post Office. A concrete pedestrian plaza sits between
Windham's parking lot and the street. New handicap accessible ramps, pedestrian
actuated traffic signals, and a painted crosswalk were recently installed at the
Square intersection
Crozet Avenue at looking north from Tabor Street.
Deficiencies:
· The existing 3 0' prescriptive, street right-of-way is not wide enough to
accommodate new sidewalk construction
Except for at the Square intersection, there are no pedestrian crosswalks
and a limited number of handicap ramps along the street.
· There are no public sidewalks on the east side of the street.
· Physical obstacles include wide commercial entrances, street-front
parking, electric poles, retaining walls, drainage ditches, and utilities.
· The existing stormwater utility system is inadequate to accommodate new
curbs, sidewalks, and parking improvements.
While the physical deficiencies are significant, the biggest challenge facing
implementation of pedestrian improvements in Crozet is the lack of an approved
urban design and streetscape "vision" for the downtown area.
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES 29
Crozet - Downtown Sidewalk and Parking Study
THE
AR~
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
AND CRO$SWALKATNRDAFF'C
flKG
A~EY
--AND PARKING
POLE
PKG.
~TAtRS
;TING
, ELEC
F
120'
ELEVATED
DRAIN
SEWER
CROZET AVENUE TO "THE SQUARE" - EX/STING
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES 30
Downtown Sidewalk and Parking St~ u_dy
sidewalks will be difficult, if not impossible, to construct in most areas
streetscape design issues including traffic volume, street width, tm-lanes,
curbs, and drainage are resolved by the community, the County
VDOT. In addition, urban design issues including adaptive re-use of existing
building infill, architectural design guidelines, and public parking must
carefully studied and addressed.
into account the recommendations of the 1995 Study and the current needs
desires of the community, the following Master Plan recommendations are
one possible development scheme for downtown and to
urban design and streetscape design dialog between vested groups. The
street sections are based on existing, successful commercial streets
Charlottesville/Albemarle area. They permit efficient pass-through traffic
accommodating local commercial traffic and left-hand turning movements.
wide sidewalks and streetscape improvements encourage pedestrian use and
the streetscape framework for revitalizing and redeveloping downtown.
Obtain the additional right-of-way or easements necessary to construct
new sidewalks.
Construct new concrete curb and gutter, urban section sidewalks and
stormwater utilities along the east side of the street.
a 47' street section on the northern end of Crozet Avenue
accommodating 11' travel lanes, an 11' center turn lane, 7' parallel
both sides of the street, and 10' sidewalks.
a 33' street section on the southern end of Crozet Avenue
11' foot travel lanes, an 11' center turn lane, and 6'
streetscape improvements to include public plazas, specialty
decorative lighting, street furniture and street trees.
paver crosswalks and concrete handicap ramps at ali
entrance drives.
)wntown entrance feature and sign at the Tabor Street
area-wide, stormwater utility system
design with Jarman's Gap Road improvements.
31
Crozet - Downtown Sidewalk and Parking 8tudy
NEW STREESCAPE INCLUDES
PLAZAS, DECORATIVE PVMTE,
LIGHTING, STREET FURNITURE,
AND STREET TREES
'UBLIC PARKING A~
STREETSCAPE
A) TRAVEL LANES AT 11'
B) LEFT TURN LANES AT I
C) PARALLEL PARKING AT 7'
D) SIDEWALKS AT 10'
E) CROSSWALKS AT 8'
F) HC RAMPS
PRESERVE WESTERN
STREET EDGE,
PVMT. EAST
NEW 45' STR~ETSCAPE
IA) TRAV£L LANES AT
J~) LEFT TURN LANES
lC) SIDEWALKS AT 6'
D) CROSSWALKS AT Z
i£) HC RAMPS
11
AT THE SQUARE
PUBLIC PARKING
EAST OF CROZET
SHARED PARKING BEHIND
NEW COMMERCIAL BLDGS.
'INCLUDES CURBING, LIGHTS,
DRAINAGE UTILITIES, WALKS
AND LANDSCAPING
'NEW ACCESS DRIVE AND
PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL
AND COMMERCIAL USE
\
AND DRAIN INLETS
~ CROZET DOWNTOWN ENTRANCE
o" 30' 60' 120, FEATURE WITH WALLS, SIGNAGE
~ AND LANDSCAPING
CROZET AVENUE TO "THE SQUARE" - RECOHHENDED
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES 32
Crozet - Downtown Sidewalk and Parking Study
67' Schematic Streetscape Section
4' ti' TFAV~F.L. .,~ Ii' TIJFH
TF-~
45' Schematic Streetscape Section
_PUBLIC PAJ~ KING.
A number of downtown areas were examined to determine their public parking
potential. They were chosen based on the following criteria: pro:dmity to the
central commercial area, vehicular access and ability to serve multiple
commercial businesses, layout efficiency and parking yield, streetscape and urban
design contributions, and favorable site development factors. The three areas
having potential are: the Square, area east of Crozet Avenue, and the Blue Goose
site.
The Square
Existing Conditions:
ANHOLD AS$OCfA TE$ 3 3
Crozet - Downtown Sidewalk and Parking Study
· For many years, the County leased the area from CSX to provide public
parking spaces downtown. However, the railroad recently indicated they
wo..u, ld not continue the lease arrangement, creating some uncertainty on
th~ future availability of the area.
· There is a 40' road right-of-way directly in front of the commercial
buildings that is currently used for' parking.
· The right-of-way also serves as primary truck access to the lumberyard,
creating potential conflicts that could limit future parking use.
· The access aisles and parking spaces, as currently configured, do not meet
all County parking ordinance requirements and there is limited expansion
potential.
· Pavement surfaces and edges are deteriorating. There are no stormwater
utilities or pedestrian improvements and the overall character of the area is
less than inviting.
Development Recommendations:
· The County should pursue legal negotiations with CSX to secure
ownership of the parcel so to maintain at least the current level of parking.
The County should pursue negotiations with VDOT to secure parking
privileges in the road right-of-way.
· Improvements should be made including new curb and gutter, asphalt
pavement, stormwater utilities, lighting, and landscaping.
· The existing sidewalk along the front of the buildings should be replaced
and widened to provide adequate room for pedestrians and outdoor
commercial displays.
· Streetscape improvements including specialty pavement, benches, trash
receptacles, and decorative lighting should be installed.
· The alley, between buildings, should be closed and converted to pedestrian
use. Service areas should be restricted to the back.
· A pedestrian, railroad crossing with warning lights and/or other safety
measures should be secured between the Square and the northern
commercial areas.
EAST OF CROZETAVENUE
Existing Conditions:
· Currently functions as a commercial parking area for building at the
Square and along Crozet Avenue.
· Includes multiple property parcels and road right-of-ways.
· Because of deteriorated pavements, undefined edges, and service
functions, the overall character of the area is not attractive.
· Basic pedestrian accommodations are deficient.
· Stormwater utilities are lacking.
· The site will efficiently yield a large number ofparking spaces and has
favorable site development factors.
ANHOLD ASSOCL4~S 34
Crozet - Downtown Sidewalk and t' arking Study
Development Recommendations:
Eliminate wide curb cuts and perpendicular street-front parking along
Cr~zet Avenue.
· Provide a mid-block, access drive along Crozet Avenue, close alleys
between buildings, and provide vehicular access to the Square along the
pharmacy building.
Screen parking area behind existing and proposed buildings.
· .Provide double-loaded parking bays parallel to Crozet Avenue to optimize
parking efficiency.
· Parking area site improvements should include concrete curb and gutter,
asphalt pavement, lighting, signage, and stormwater utilities.
· Install landscaped medians and islands to provide shade and enhance the
visual character of the lot.
· Provide pedestrian improvements to allow for convenient and comfortable'
access between parking spaces and building entries. Improvements should
include concrete sidewalks, lighting, benches and other street furniture,
plazas, fountains, landscaping and decorative pavements.
Schematic Street Plan
BLUE GOOSE SITE
Existing Conditons :
· The site is currently occupied by a small office building with asphalt
parking to the back.
ANHOLD AS$OCIATE$
35
Crozet- Downtown Sidewalk and Parking Study
· The owner has existing plans to construct a second commercial building at
the western edge of the property with parking in front. Unfortunately, this
d~lopment pattern will not contribute to spatial definition of the street or
to an inviting pedestrian environment for the downtown.
· Stormwater utilities are located at the back of the site.
Development Recommendations:
· Maintain or consolidate new building development along the street with
additional parking located to the back.
· Provide double-loaded parking bays perpendicular to Crozet Avenue to
optimize the efficiency of the lot.
· Site improvements should include concrete curb and gutter, asphalt
pavement, lighting, signage, and stormwater utilities.
· Install landscaped medians and islands to provide shade and enhance the
visual character of the lot.
· Provide interior road connections to the north and south to facilitate inter-
parcel access and maximize parking convenience:
CROZET A VENUE & THREE NOTCHED ROAD 1NTE~ECTION
This intersection functions visually as a downtown gateway and functionally as a
commercial crossroads. The area is bounded by the Dairy Queen, the railroad
bridge, the rescue squad building and the shopping center to the east. The west
side of Crozet Avenue is defined by concrete curb and a new 5' sidewalk
connecting the bridge to northern residential areas. There are also some sidewalk
improvements at the library corner and in front of the car wash and florist
buildings to the east.
Crozet Ave. and Three Notched Road Intersection looking east.
ANHOLD ASSOCDtTES 36
~rozet- Downtown Sidewalk and Parking Study
Deficiencies:
· The existing 28'right-of-way on the north side of Three Notched Road is
not:.:.~,~'de enough to entirely accommodate new sidewalk construction.
The 'right-of-way width on the south side along the railroad is unknown at
this time. Deed research and field surveying is required to determine the
exact location of railroad and VDOT property lines. Additional right-of-
way or easement area will probably have to be obtained for sidewalk
construction along the road.
· Steep slopes at the intersection and adverse stormwater drainage
conditions present substantial obstacles along Crozet Avenue.
· The asphalt sidewalk and curb under the narrow railroad bridge do not
provide adequate physical or psychological separation between pedestrian
and vehicular traffic.
· The wide curb cuts and street-~ont parking at the Knight Glass building
will be obstacles until replacement parking is constructed.
· One comer of the library building is very close to the road.
· While two crosswalks were recently painted at'the intersection, many
others are still lacking.
· The intersection has inadequate vehicular sight distances making it
dangerous for pedestrians.
·
Recommendations:
· Establish a new, variable width street section along Three Notched Road
to accommodating 11' foot travel lanes, an I 1' center turn lane, parallel
parking, a 6' wide sidewalk along the library, and a 10' sidewalk in t~ont
of the commercial area. Install stormwater utilities as required.
· Install concrete curb, sidewalk, and protective bollards or railings, and
lighting under the railroad bridge to improve security, and safety
conditions. Install stormwater utilities as required.
· Install decorative paver crosswalks and concrete handicap curb cuts at the
intersection and all street crossings.
· While some of these pedestrian improvements could be implemented now,
the sidewalks along the northern edge of Rt. 240 will probably not be
possible before better parking and access solutions are found for the area~
ANHOLD ASSOCL4 TES 3 7
C~ozet - Do~nto~n $i~lk ~l P~l~n~ StuEy
MULTIPLE SERVICE & PARKING AREAS
A) NO PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS TO BLDG ENTRES
TOPOGRAPHIC CHALLENGES & RErAINING 'WALLS
DUMPSTERS AND OTHER UNSIGHTLY CONDITIONS
D) NARROW ACCESS DRIVES & UNDEFINED PKG.
ROAD & PARKING AREAS ! [.E.,~'"'"'"'"~'
POOR VISIBILITY &
NO CROSSWALKS
AT INTERSECTION
THREE NOTCHED RD.
RAILROAD
DRAINAGE
AND DITCH
RETAINING WALLS
DETERIORATED WALKS
POOR DRAINAGE & LIGHTING
UNDER RAILROAD
SLOPE
AT ENTRANCE
& ROAL
30'
12o'
CROZET AVENUE ~ THREE NOTCHED ROAD INTERSECTION - EXISTING
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES 38
Crozet - Downtown Sidewalk and Parking Study
Schematic Street Section
PUBLIC P,4_~ KnVG
One area was thought to have public parking potential due to its relative size,
proximity to the commercial area, ability to contribute to urban design and
streetscape goals and location behind existing buildings.
NORTH OF THREE NOTCHED ROAD
Existing Conditions:
· Currently serves employee parking, service functions, storage, and some
limited customer parking.
Composed ofmukiple property parcels that may be difficult to assemble
or coordinate.
o The site drops significantly in elevation from the road to the existing
stream. The area has a number of steep slope areas, retaining wails and
steep access drives.
· The stream, at the back, presents environmental development challenges
including stormwater runoff control and water quality concerns.
· The residential area, at the back, will have visual screening, lighting
control and noise abatement concerns.
· The site does not have the most favorable site development factors and
will be expensive to construct.
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES 39
Crozet- Downtown Sidewalk and Parking Study
NEW 45' STREET SECTION
A] TRAVEL LANES AT 11'
B) LEFT TURN LANES AT 11'
c) SlO~AU:S AT 6' MIN.
O] CROSSW~S AT 8'
Dp.
PRESERVE STREAM
. CORRIDOR AND
~ WO~ODED BurrER
I~!!V NEW CO~RC~A~ ~OS. ~
~ INCLUD~ CURBING, UGH~~
- _ DRAINAGE UTILITIES, ~ ~ ~
~:::W:~::'::~ ! · J · It ' J[ ' '
RAILROAD AVE.
DRAINAGE, LIGHTING, -- NEW STREESCAPE
PVMT$,
RAILING & PVMT IMPRO FURNITUR£,
UNDER R.R. BRIDGE , STREET TREES
I ....
CROZET AVENUE & THREE NOTCHED ROAD INTERSECTION - RECOHHENDED
AN. gOLD ASSOCIATES 40
Crozet - Downtown Sidewalk and Parking Study
Development Recommendations:
· Maintain or consolidate new building development along the street with
ne~.parking located to the rear. Relocate rescue squad functions and
convert existing building to commercial use.
· Eliminate existing street-front parking and provide new sidewalk and
streetscape areas.
· Establish primary access drives adjacent to the Olive Tree and behind
Knight Glass. Provide vehicular access to existing shopping center to the
east.
· Provide double-loaded parking bays parallel to Three Notched Road to
optimize lot efficiency.
· Site improvements should include concrete cUrb and gutter, asphalt
pavement, lighting, signage, and stormwater utilities. A retaining wall
will be needed along the stream valley.
· Preserve mature vegetation along the stream. Provide interior landscaped
medians and islands to provide shade and enhance the visual character of
the lot.
· Provide pedestrian improvements allowing for convenient and
comfortable access between parking spaces and building entries. These
should include concrete sidewalks, lighting, benches and other street
furniture, plazas, fountains, landscaping and decorative pavements.
FOUNTAIN
Schematic Parking Area Improvements
SIDEWALK SUMMARY
The following chart summarizes the Master Plan deficiencies and improvement
recommendations for each of the sidewalk study areas.
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES 41
.Study
Enhancement Elements
some examples of streetseape elements that could be used for the
o£downtown Crozet.
Wooden Bench
Bike Rack
Trash Receptacle
1
t
t
1
Paper Box Grouping
Street Tree and Grate
ANIarOLD ASSOCIATES 55
! X.-Downtb~wn Sidewalk and Parking Study
Pedestrian "Bump-out' With Handicap Ramps
Decorative Paving and Tree Grate
Lighting and Signage
Pedestrian Crosswalk With Pavers
Street Cafe
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES $~
NEW '45' STREET SECT/ON
A) TRAVEL~ LANES AT 1 I'
B,) LEFT 'TURN LANES AT 1 I'
C,) SIDEWALKS AT 6' MIN.
D,) CROSSWALKS AT ,~'
v
¸DR.
SHARED PARKING BEHIND
NEW COMMERCIAL BLDGS.
INCLUDES CURBING,
DRAINAGE UTILITIES,
AND
PRESERVE STREAM
CORRIDOR AND
BUFFER
RAILROAD AVE.
DRAINAGE,
RAILING &. PVMT
UNDER R.R. BRIDGE
NEW STRE£$CAPE INCLUDES'
PLAZAS, DECORATIVE PVMTS,
LIGHTING, STREET FURNITURE,
AND STREET TREES
-- NEW
AND STREET
PARKING
THE SQUARE
'UBLIC PARKING
GOOSE SITE
STREETSCAPE
LANES AT 11 '
TURN LANES AT 1 I'
PARKING AT 7'
.KS AT
E) CROSSWALKS AT
F,) HC RAMPS
PRESERVE WESTERN
STREET EDGE,
PVMT. EAST
LANES AT
EFT TURN LANES
SHARED PARKING BEHIND
NEW COMMERCIAL BLDGS.
'INCLUDES CURBING, LIGHTS,
DRAINAGE UTILITIES, WALKS
AND LANDSCAPING
NEW ACCESS DRIVE AND
PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL
AND COMMERCIAL USE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Six Year Secondary Plan
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Public hearing on County Priority List of Road Improvements
and VDOT Six Year Secondary Road Plan
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker,Foley,Cilimberg,Benish,Wade
AGENDA DATE:
January 16, 2002
ACTION: X
CONSENT AGENDA:
ITEM NUMBER:
INFORMATION:
ACTION: Yes INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY: ~/
BACKGROUND:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission reviewed the County Priority List and VDOT Six Year Secondary Road
Plan at their meeting on October 16, 2001 and unanimously recommended approval of both. The Board of
Supervisors reviewed these documents at a work session on November 7, 2001.
DISCUSSION:
Attachment A is the Draft County Priodty List for Secondary Road Improvement and Attachment B is the VDOT Draft
Six Year Road Construction Plan. The staff report presented to the Planning Commission and the Board of
Supervisors is included as Attachment C. The Board of Supervisors did not recommend any changes at their
November 7, 2001 worksession.
One project outstanding at the time this staff report was written is Corville Farm Road. The Board will need to decide
if a resolution should be adopted to request VDOT to accept Corville Farm Road into the State Secondary System
of Highways and construct improvements under the Rural Addition Program. If the Board of Supervisors decides to
adopt a resolution, the project will then have to be added to the VDOT Six Year Road Construction Plan (Attachment
B). It wil have an impact on projects currently scheduled to receive funds in FY 2002-03. The Department of
Engineering and Public Works has estimated the project cost at $150,000. If this project is added, staff and VDOT
will make a final adjustment to the Six Year Plan:
VDOT has also indicated that revenue collection for this fiscal year is down from what was expected and some
adjustments to allocations in the VDOT Six Year Plan may be necessary. The exact amount of adjustments, if any,
is not known at this time, but appears to be in the range of five (5) percent. Staff would recommend approval of the
plan with the current proposed allocations. If any adjustments to the plan are necessary, the amended Plan would
be returned to the Board for review and re-adoption.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the County Priority List and VDOT Six Year Secondary Plan after the public hearing.
cc: Mr. James L. Bryan, VDOT
02.003 01-09-02P0t :1'7 RCVD
DRAFT ALBEMARLE COUNTY 'PRIO'RI LIST FOR SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
2002-03 Through 2007-08
[SOME PROJECTS MAY NOT BE COMPLETED AS PRIORITIZED DUE TO PROJECT COMPLEXITY AND/OR AVAILABLE FUNDING]
ATTACHMENT A
VDOT's County's Route Number and Name Location Estimated Estimated
Priority Proposed From - To Advertisement Cost
List Ranking Date
Description/Comments
N/A N/A 606 Dickerson Road ntersection of Rt. 743 Jun-02 $6,500,000
Month-Year
1 1 County wide County wide Jun-08 $825,000
1 1 County wide Traffic mgmt. Program Jun-08 $300,000
2 2 625 Hatton Ferry Hatton Ferry Jun-08 $120,000
3 3 West Leigh Drive Rt 250 to .4 mi nor. Rt. 250 Aug-02 $500,000
4 4 Meadow Creek Parkway Melbourne Rd to Rio Road Jun-04 $14,505,100
4 4 Meadow Creek Parkway Bridge over Meadow Creek Jun-04 $2,204,500
5 5 649 Airport Road Route 29 to Route 606 Jul-03 $10,944,050
6 6 651 Free State Road Free State Road Jul-05 $3,350,000
7 '! Meadow Creek Parkway Route 631 to Route 29 Jan-15 $37,500,000
8 8 691 Jarmans Gap Road Route 240 to Route 684 Dec-04 $5,150,000
9 9 649 Proffit Road Rt 29 to 1.6 miles east Aug-06 $9,500,000
10 10 601 Old Ivy Road Ivy Road to 250~29 Byp Aug-08 $7,200,000
11 11 656 Georgetown Road Route 654 to Route 743 Dec-08 $3,200,000
12 12 781 Sunset Avenue NCL to Fifth St Extended Oct-08 $1,650,000
13 13 631 Old Lynchburg Road 1.35 MI. S. 1-64 to Rt.708 Dec-08 $1,500,000
14 14 726 James River Road Route 795 to Route 1302 Dec-08 $800,000
15 15 679 Grassmere Road .25 miles south of Rt 738 Dec-01 $100,000
16 16 744 Hunt Club Road near intersection with Rt. 22 Feb,02 $10,000
Projects in bold are in the Development Area.
relocated to meet FAA requirements, funded w/Fed. Funds, proj. will extend runway
signs,pipe,plant mix projects, same funding
Staff working with VDOT for traffic calming in the Hollymead area in 2001-02, multi-stop§, ped. X-walk
operation of ferry [240]
rural addition
plans being dev. with citizen adv. cmt., includes bridge over CSX RR
widen to four lanes (associated with project above)
widen to four lanes, bike lanes,sidewalks,RS98/99 [14,100]
proposal to construct road from Rio Rd to Free St Rd to replace substandard bridge [420]
new road, County also petitioning for eligib, for primary road ffin ding RS 97198
serve increased traf w/min widening, peal/bike access, RS 1999100 [2,100]
im prove alignment, urban x-section with bike/sidewalk,RS 2006~2007 [3,000]
widen, improve align, bike/sidewalk access,RS 2000/01 [4,300]
spot improvement, pedestrain access,urban cross-section, RS 97198 [16,000]
spot and inter. Improve., urban x-sect, upgrade 2 lane. RS 2005106, peal/bike access
spot improvements at various locations, RS 2001/02 [2,500]
spot improve, improve sight distance, RS 2002/03 [720]
Railroad crossing with no lights or gate [250]
Railroad crossing with no lights or gate. hazard elimination safety funds
VDOT's
Priority
List
COUnty's
Proposed
Ranking
Route Number and Name
Location
From - To
Estimated Estimated
Advertisement Cost
Date
Month-Year
Description/COmments
17
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
N/A
N/A
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
4O
810 Browns Gap Road
795 Blenheim Road
676 Tilman Road Road
678 Owensville Road
606 Dickerson Road
614 Garth Road
795 James Monroe Pky
Southern Parkway
N/A
643 Polo Grounds Road
641 Frays Mill Road
641 Frays Mill Road
631 Rio Road
743 Earlysville Road
729 Buck Island Rd
684 Half Mile Branch Road
641 Burnley Station Road
708 Dry Bridge Road
602 Howardsville Tnpk
640 Gilbert Station Road
642 Red Hill Depot Road
671 Millington Road
692 Plank Road
708 Red Hill Road
Hillsdale Drive
601 Garth Road
Projects in bold are in the Development Area.
Intersection of Route 789
Intersection of Route 790
Intersection of Route 250
Intersection of Route 250
Route 649 to Route 743
Intersection of Rt. 676
Intersection of Route 53
Avon Str. to Fifth Str.
Route 240 to Route 250
Route 29 to Route 649
Rt. 641 @ Jacob Run
Rt. 641 @ Jacob Run
Rio Rd @ Pen Park Lane
Rivanna River to Rt 643
Rt. 53 to Rt. 1120
Rt~ 691 to Rt. 797
Norfolk Southern RR
Railroad overpass
.01 miles south Route 626
Norfolk Southern RR
.28 miles northeast Rt. 708
Intersection of Route 665
Route 29 to Route 712
Route 20 to Route 29
Greenbrier Dr. to Seminole Sq.
Intersection of Route 658
Sep-10 $550,000 Intersection improvement. RS 2003/04.[2,000]
Oct-10 $300,000
intersection improvement. [570]
$200,000 intersection improvement, RS 2003/04 [4,800]
$650,000 intersection improvement [2,800]
$1,200,000 improve to handle projected traffic, CHART recomm., RS 2002~03 [6,000]
N/A intersection improvement, public request [3100]
$350,000 recommended from CATS, intersection improvement. RS 2005/06 [2,700]
$4,000,000 Extend to 5th St., with pedestrian/bike facility, and Neighborhood street design/speed
N/A interconnect of future neighborhood streets
$1,500,000 public req. to imprev align, spot improv, safety related, RS 2004/05 [750]
$440,000 install box culvert,RS 2005/06, not a County priority,a VDOT recommendedsafety project
$60,000 install box culvert, no County Priority,a VDOT recommended safety project
$1,000,000 Inter. improve, requested by City, to be funded from private source [22,000]
$1,000,000 public request to improv align, spot improv, safety related. RS 2004/05 [8,400]
improve road geometrics, two lane rural section [4400]
spot/safety improvement to serve increased traffic w/ minimum widening [680]
bridge project with Iow sufficiency rating
school transp. Dept. request, Iow weight limit
Railroad crossing with no lights or gate
bridge project with Iow sufficiency rating
Railroad crossing with no gate
intersection improvement
spot improvements, safety related
improve alignment
[340]
[390]
[170]
[8o]
[370]
[1,200]
[1,200]
new connector road between Hillsdale Rd and Hydraulic Rd, most of project is located in City limits
add turning lane at Barracks Farm Road, CATS recomm. [6,400]
VDOT's
Priority
List
County's
Proposed
Ranking
Route Number and Name
Location
From - To
Estimated
Advertisement
Date
Month-Year
Estimated
Cost
Descri ption/Comments
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Projects in bold are in the
41 676 Ownesville Road
42 691 Park Road
43 678 Decca Lane
44 616 Union Mill Road
45 743 Advance Mills Road
46 732 Milton Road
47 795 Hardware Street
48 622 Albevanna Springs Rd
49 622 AIbevanna Springs Rd
50 680 Browns Gap Tnpk
51 611 Jarmans Gap Road
52 1310 Ferry Street
53 682 Broadaxe Road
54 813 Starlight Road
55 676 Owensville Road
56 615 Lindsay Road
57 737 Mountain Vista Road
58 708 Secretarys Road
59 702 Reservoir Road
60 640 Gilbert Station Road
61 633 Heards Mtn Road
62 606 Dickerson mad
63 769 Beam Road
64 623 Woods Edge Rd
Development Area.
Route 614 to Route 1050
Park Road to Route 250
Intersection of Route 676
FCL to Route 759
At Jacobs Run
Intersection of 762
Near inter, with Rt. 20
Intersection of Route 795
Intersection of Route 773
F~t. 240 to Rt. 810
Off Route 691
.05 miles south of Rt. 6
Off Dick Woods Road
Off Route 712
Intersection of Route 601
Route 639 to Louisa CL
Route 6 to Route 726
Route 795 to Route 620
Ramp to Dead end
Route 641 to Route 747
Nelson CL to Route 634
Route 850 to Route 1030
Off Route 20 north
Route 616 to dead end
Nov-01
Dec-02
Jan-03
Dec-04
Oct-03
Oct-04
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
$220,000
$650,000
$825,000
$1,400,000
$360,000
$360,000
$1,280,000
$200,000
$365,000
spot improvements at several points, CATS recommendation [2,300]
extend to eastern 240/250 street system [600]
improve intersection, located near school, CATS recommendation [1,900]
improve alignment [4,600]
improve approach to bridge [1,000]
sp(~t improvement, requested by public [1,000]
spot improvement, requested by Scottsville [570]
intersection improvement [710]
intersection improvement [710]
spot improvements, public request [700]
Railroad crossing with no gate [210]
Railroad crossing with no gate [80]
spot improvements, public request [120]
school request,needs turn-around space [60]
intersection improvement [4800]
unpaved road, R-O-W available [230]
un paved road, R-O-W available [60]
unpaved road, full R-O-W not available [260]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined, sidewalks
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [240]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [60]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [360]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [780]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [420]
VDOT's
Priority
List
28
29
County's
Proposed
Ranking
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
9O
Route Number and Name
784 Doctors Crossing
712 Coles Crossing Rd
Location
From . To
Estimated
Advertisement
Date
Month-Year
Estimated
Cost
Description/Comments
647 Maxfleld Road
688 Midway Road
689 Pounding Creek Rd
666 Allen Road
736 White Mtn Road
734 Bishop Hill Road
640 Gilbert Station Road
685 Bunker Hill Road
645 Wildon Grove Rd
712 North Garden Road
668 Walnut Level Road
712 Coles Crossing Rd
762 Rose Hill Church Ln
682 Broad Axe Road
605 Durrett Ridge Road
704 Fortune Lane
678 Owensville Road
760 Red Hill School Road
608 Happy Creek Road
874 Sugar Ridge Road
723 Sharon Road
707 Blair Park Road
769 Rocky Hollow Road
637 Dick Woods Road
Route 600 to Route 640
Rt. 711 to Rt. 692
Oct-08
Jun-09
$1,238.105
$450,000
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined
unpaved road public request, R-Q-W undetermined
** Currently not eligible not for VDOT funding
Rt.22 to Dead end
Rt. 635 to Rt. 824
Rt. 250 to Rt. 635
Route 664 to Dead end
Rt. 635 to Dead End
Route 795 to Rt. 1807
Route 784 to Route 20
Route 616 to Dead end
Rt. 608 to Orange CL
Route 29 to Route 760
Rt. 810 to dead end
Rt. 713 to Rt. 795
Rt. 732 to Deand End
Rt. 637 to 1-64
Rt. 743 to Swift Run
Rt. 715 to Dead End
Route 676 to Route 614
Route 29to RHES
Route 645 to Route 646
Route 614 to Route 673
Route 6 to Route 626
Rt. 691 to Dead end
Rt. 1484 to Dead end
Rt. 691 to Rt, 692
$117,506,755
unpaved road
unpaved read
unpaved read
unpaved road
unpaved road
unpaved road
unpaved road
unpaved road
unpaved road
unpavedroad
unpaved road
unpaved road
unpaved road,
unpavedroad,
unpaved road,
unpaved road,
unpaved road,
public request, R-O-W undetermined
public request, R-O-W undetermined
public request, R-O-W undetermined
public request, R-O-W undetermined
public request, R-O-W undetermined
public request, R-O-W undetermined
R-O-W not available
public request, R-O-W undetermined
public request, R-O-W undetermined
R-O-W not available
public request, R-O-W undetermined
BOS request, R-O-W undetermined
BOS request, R-O-W undetermined
R-O-W not available
R-O-W not available
public request, R-O-W undetermined
R-O-W not available
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined
unpaved road, R-O-W undetermined
un paved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined
[360]
[250]
[470]
[360]
[340]
[220]
[200]
[180]
[170]
[150]
[140]
[140]
[130]
[130]
[130]
[120]
[120]
[120]
[120]
[120]
[100]
[80]
[7o]
[7o]
[45]
[2o]
[ ] Most Current Average Daily Trips
Secondary System
County: Albemarle
Construction Program
Estimated Allocations
ATTACHMENT A
Fiscal Year
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
Tolals
NeW Surface Federal Other Total
Treatments
!$735.923 $3,814,811 $195,000 $4.745.734
'$864,395 $4,111.478 $445,000 $5,420,873
' $944.443 $4.830,936 $70,000 $5,845.379
$981.305 $4,919,786 $170,000 $6.071,091
~1.026,419 $4,742,481 $565.656 $6,334,556
$1.026,41 g $4,900~00 $408,137 $6,334,556
$5,578,904 $27.319.492 $1,853,793 $34,752.189
Page I of 8
Board Approval Date:: ~.pz'3[], 4~ 200].
- District: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(in dollars)
County: Albemarle 2001-02 through 2006-07
~oute Road Name Esfimaled Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance toScope of Work
Funding Complete FHWA ft
=PMS ID Project # Required Comments
Accomplishment FROM ' 2005-05 2006-07
Type of Funds: TO : ~ 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
Type of Project Length :
Prtort~ # Tramc C6unt AD Date:
BUDGET ITEM
RL 8000 Total County. Wide Allocation PE $0~E $0
~D: CWt CWl RW $3 ~W tO
; 2003~4 $150,000 SIGNAL @ RT
State Force~ NEW PIPE INSTALL., CON~ CON $0 ~ 631/164
STATE SIGNS, SI~EDtNG Tofa~~'~'~E~ 'oral $0 Rev. Sh. 2003-4 $300000
County-Wide lnctden~tal NEW PLANT MIX
prf #: 0 i 0 711101 $850,000 $125,000 $125,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $t00,000 $300,000
RL 8001 Total County-Wide Allocation PE $0 PE $0
ID: CWI CWI ! RW $0RW $0 Prelim. Engineering 2COI-02
Confl'ad TRAFFIC ,CALMING- CON $300,000 CON $0 Hollymeede Dr.
STATE VARIOUS LOC. Tolal $300,000 Total $0
CounyWIde Incideotal i $300,000 $50,000 $60,000 $60,000 $~,000 $.~3,000 $50,000 $0
Pti ff. 0 i 0 7/1/01
Rt, 0625 HATTON FERRY PE $0 PE $0
ID: 0625'002i RW $0 RW $0
State Forces OPERATI~ HATrON CON $120,000 CON $0
STATE FERRY ', Total $120,000 Tolal $0
Regular (BUDGL~ ITEM) $120,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 S20,000 $20,000 $20.000
~ ?11/01
Pti #: 2 i 220
RL 9999 WEST LEIGH DRIVE PE $20,000 ~E $20,000
ID: 56085 9999-O02.269,C501 RW $'20,000 ~W $20,000 RURAL ADDITION
Contract Route 250 CON $460,000 ~ON $210,000
STATE 0.4 N. RTE. 250 Tolal $500,000 Total $25a,000
RegUlar 0.4 MI. $250,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 t0 $0
Pti #: 3 0 5/t/02
RL 0~31 MclNTIRE RD, E..X~. PE $50,000 ~E $50,000
ID: 2530 0631-002-128,B657 RW $0 ~W $0 4-LANE BRIDGE
Co.ired BRIDGE OVER CSX RR CON $I,830,500 ;ON $840.0~1 -
BR NEW ALIGNMENT Total $~1,880,500 Tolal $a90,000
Regular ', $990,500 $9~0,600 $0 S0 S0 t0 $0 S0
P~ #: 4 0 71t~/02 NEW ALIGNMENT-2 lanes
co..~ NCL CHA.LO~rESV,LLE CON
s~P csx RA,LRoAO ~~ Tot.,
Regular 1.37 MI.
J ~ $2,460,495 $973,579 $t,488,g16 $0 $0 tO $0 tO
Pr~ #: 4 0 ,~-. ,
Date: 4/5/01
Page 2 of 8
District: Culpeper
County: Albemarle
Board Approval Dale::
ID
,f Project
2530
2456
R000
52393
6
12081
7
0~9t
11129
~egular
)~. 8
~L 0649
,~t415
: tegutar
~ge 3 of 8
SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(in dollars)
2001-02 through 2006-07
Road Name ~ Eslimaled Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance
Project # Funding
FROM I Required Complete
TO i 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Length
Traffic Count AD Date:
MclNTIRE RD. E.~T. PE $150,000 nE $150,000
0631-002-128,5812 RW $0 ~W $0
BRIDGE OVER '
CON $2,054,500 3ON $2,054,50O
MEADOWCREEK
, Total $2,204,~00 Total $2,204,500
0 ~ 7/1/02 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
A~RPORT ROAD. PE $1,237,400 PE $ t,237,400
0649-002-158,C5Ol RW $4,856,550 RW $3,092,477
ROLTrE 29
CON $4,850,100 CON $0
ROUTE 606 , Total $'10,944,05O Total S4,329,87T
0.83 MI.
13411 i 7/1/03 $9,914,173 $050,732 $1,7o0,000 $2,920,122 $1,343,319 $0 $0 , $0
FREE STATE RdAD CONNECTO PE $600,000 mE $600,000
R000-002-250,C801 RW $750,000 r~W $5O2,641
RIO ROAD
CON $2,0oo,ooo CON $0
ROUTE 651
Total $3,35O,000 Total $1,102,~4t
0.70 MI
0 . 7/1/05 $2,247,359 $0 ' S0 $36,882 $1,600,000 $610,477 $0 $0
MEADOWCREEK PKY. PE $4,200,000 ~E $1,402,365
R000-002.253,PEI01 RW $0,500,000 RW $0
RIO ROAD CON $28,800,000 CON $0
RTE. 29 . Total $37,500,000 Total $1,402,365
3.8 MI
0 1/1/15 $38,097,835 $100,000 $109.900 $150,456 $432,681 $097,465 $300,000 $34,317,133
JARMAN GAP ROAD PE $65O,000 PE $208.209
0691-002-258.C501 RW $1,300,000 RE
ROUTE 240
CON $3,200,000 CON $0
ROUTE 684
Total $5,1S0,0~0 Tote/ S208,209
2118 811/05 $4,941.701 $100,000 S700,O0O $1,.~)0,000 $64t,791 $1,000,000 S0 S1,000,00O
PROFFIT RD. PE $1,500,000 PE $o
0649-002..C RW $3.000.000 RW $0
ROUTE 20 CON $5,000,000 CON
1,6 MI. E. RTE. 29
Total S9,~00,000 Total
2.60 MI.
2273 8/1/06 $g,~o0,000 $1,000,000 $114,652 $223,476 S90t,995 $1,685,328 S4,100,000 S1,474,541
Scope of Work
FHWA #
Comments
2-lane Bddge
4.LANE DIVIDED
REVENUE SHARING $1,000.000 1908-
99
Paid
URBAN DESIGN W/S.W. & BIKE LANES
2-LANE DESIGN
REVENUE SHARING $1.000.000 Ig05-
96
Paid
NEW ALIGNMENT
REVENUE SHARING $800,000 199L
Paid
REVENUE SHARING 109~*2000
$1,000,000
2-LANE URBAN W/S.W. & BIKE LANES
REVENUE SHARING $I,000,000 2005-
2-LANES RURAL W/BIKE LANES
Dale: 415101
LIGHTS & GATES
District: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: 2001-02 through 2006-07
:~oute Road Name Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
=PMS ID Proiect # ; Funding .
kccompl shment FROM Required Complete FHWA #
Fype of Funds: TO Comments
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
type of Project Length
riorit~ # Traffic Count . AD Date:
~L 0601 OLD IVY ROAD PE $950,000PE $g10,000
D: 8807 0601-002-237,C501 RW $2,500,000RW . $0
:onltacl I ROUTE 250 i CON $3,750,000CON $0 REV. SHARING $1.000, ooo 2000~of
;TP RTE, 29 BYPASS
· Total$7,200,000Tolal $910,000 3-LANES W/S.W. & BIKE LANES
~eg~lar 0.7
)ri ~.. 10
4358 ! 9/t/08 $8,290,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244.539 $200,000 $5,845,461
{t. 0656 GEOF.(~t: I uWN ROAD PE $800.000PE ST00.000 SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
D: 12982 0656-002-254,C501 RW $600,000= qW $100,000
;ontmcl ROUTE 654
CON $2,000,000 DON $0 REVENUE SHARING $200.000 fggT*
;TP ROUTE 743 ~= Total$3,200,000Total $7OO,OO0 ;'8
~egular 0.6 MI. 2-LANES W/ S.W. & BIKE LANES
~dth tl 13500 ' 12/1/08 $2,S00,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S400,000 $200,000 $1,900,000
~t. 0781 SUNSET AVE. PE $250.000 PE $0 INTERSECTION IMPROV.
D: 17171 0781-O02- ,C i RW $300,000 RW $0
NCL CH'VILLE CON $500.000 CON $0 REVENUE SHARING $400.000 2005-08
;TATE OLD RTE. 631 ! Total$1,050,000Total $0 SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
~egt~er 0.S MI. ! A T INT. OLD STAGECOACH RD.
~ri~ 12 275 i 10/1/08 $1,050,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3§5,fl$~ $143,598 $510,748
~t. 0631 OLD LYNCHBUR'GH RD. PE $250,000 PE $0
D: 15329 0631;002. ,C I RW $250,000 RW $0
;ontmct 1.35 MI.S. 1-64
~ CON $I,500.000CON $0 REVENUE SHARING 200f-O2
.~TP RTE. 708 , Total$2,000,000Total $0 St. O00.O00
;Iegular 5.0 MI. t SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
~d~ 13 1500 ; 12/1/08 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $114,674 S100,000 $1,785,326
~l. 072~ JAMES RIVER ROAD PE $150,000 r~E SO
D: 17170 072~002. ,C ~ RW $200,000 A'W $0
ROUTE 795
, CON S450,000 DON $0
ROUTE 1302 Total $800,000 Total $0
1.0 MI.
1200, [2/1/08 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,$3§ $705,461
RAILROAD CROSSING PE $3,000 PE $3,000 '
0679-002-260,FS713 RW $1.000 RW $1,000
0.25 MI S. RT. 7;.'.'.~ CON $90.000 CON $96,000
LIGHTS & GATES) rof~/ $100,000 Tof~/ $100,000
D.05 MI.
485 ~/1/01 $0 S0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
REVENUE SHARING $200.000 2002.
;,TATE 03
;[egufar SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
~L 0B79
D: 17172
;tRP
age 4 of 8 Date: 4/5/01
District: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: 2001-02 through 2006-07
Route Road Name Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
PPMS ID Project # Funding Complete FHWA #
Accomplishment FROM Required
Type of Funds: TO Comments
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Type of Protect Length
Priority/# Traffic Count r AD Date:
RL 0679 GRASSMERE ROAD PE $10,000 PE S10,000
ID: 11127 067g-002-P61,NS01 RW $10,000 RW
SA.AP ROUTE 738 CON $280.000 CON $280,000 ~ GRAVEL ROAD
STATE END MAINT,
Total $300,000 Total $300,000 Censt to Begin June 2001
Unpaved .~< 0.7 MI.
Pr~fl: 22 216 ~ 11/1/00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0615 L NSDAY ROAD ~ PE $10.000 PE $10,000
ID: 54422 0615.-002-PG4,N,~O1 RW $10,000 RW $10,000
SAAP ROUTE 839 CON $200,000 CON $200,000 -- UNPAVED ROAD
STATE ~ LOUISA CO, LINE Total $228,000 Total $220,000 RIGHT OF WAYAVAILABLE
Unpaved 0.50 MI.
r>rf#: 23 237 ' 4/1/01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
RL 0737 MOUNTAIN VISTA RD. PE $20,000=E $20,000
D: 54425 0737-O02-P .N RW $20,000 ~W $20,000
,7.o~trec~ ROUTE $ CON $810,000 ~ON $347,385 ' ' UNPAVED ROAD RIGHT OF WA Y
~TATE 1.19 MI,E. BT. 6 rote/ $8~0,000 Fetal $387,368 AVAILARLE
Jnpaved 1119
:'~#: 24 75 ~11/02 $262,635 $262,635 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0708 SECRETARYS ROAD PE $30,000 =E $30,000
D: 11130 0708-O02-P77.NS01 RW $50,000 ~W . $50,000
~o~t~ac~ . 0.7 M.W. RTE. 795 CON $745,000 CON $8g,067 UNPAVED ROAD PARTIAL RIGHT OF
;TATE 0.28 M.W. RT. 620 Total $825,000 Tolal $t49,087 WAY
Jnpav~l 2.09
:'ri fl: 25 151 I/1/03 , $67S,933 $348,288 $222,17t $105,474 $0 $0 $0 $0
:~L 0702 RESERVOIR ROAD PE $20,000 PE $0
D: 54426 0702-002-P ,N RW $40,00o RW
.~o~tmcl ROUTE 29 RAMP CON $1,340,000 CON $0 UNt~AVED ROAD
;TATE DEAD END Total $1,400,000 Total $0 NO RIGHT OF WA Y
Jn pe',,'~J 2.4 MI.
~ri#: 26 406 12/1/04 $1,400,000 $125,000 $329,801 $578.5t2 $366,987 $0 $0 $0
~ 0640 GILBERT STATION RD. PE $20,000BE $0
:~: 54427 0640-002-P ,N RW $40,000 ~'W $0
~'rb'ect ROUTE 641 CON $300,000 'JON $0 UNPAVED ROAD NO RIGHT OF WA Y
;TATE ROUTE 747 Tolal $360,000 Total $0
~npaved 0,70 MI,
'ri ~. 27 L~ 10/1/0:~ $3eo,000 So S2~O,OOO
age 6 of 8 Dele: 4/5/01
District: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(in dollars)
County: Albemarle 2001-02 through 2006-07
Board Approval Da Scope of Work
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ute Road Name ; Estimated Cost Previous Funding AdditlonaIFunding PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS 3alanCecompletetoFHWA ff
MS ID Project # Required :omments
:compllshment FROM
TO 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-b6 2006-07
/pa of Funds:
~pe of Project Length
loft # Traffic Count AD Date: '
~ GATES & LIGHTS
.0625 HA'I~ON FERRY ROAD PE $3.000 PE $3,000
: 17173 0~25-002,262,FS714 RW $1,000 RW $1,000 Const~ctton Complete
)ntrad ~ I~ILROAD CROSSING CON $96,000 CON $96,000
~p NEAR HA'I~'ON FERRY Total $100,000 Total S100,000
q~.Jlar 0,05 M1. SO SO S0 $0 S0 SO S0 S0
i #: 18 211 12/1/00 i GATES & LIGHTS
· 0744 . HUNT CLUB ROAD PE $1,000 =E $1,000
: 54460 0744-002-S63,FS~15 RW SO ~W SO
Ii)road NEAR INT. RTE, ~2 CON Sg,000 ~ON
:~p RAILROAD CROSSING rolal $40,000 Total $t0,000
~,gutar 0.05
! $o SO $0 $0 $o $o $o $o
i th. 17 640 , 8/1/01 GATES & LIGHTS
WEST LEIGH DRIVE PE $1,000 r'E $1,000
: 56O86 9999-002-270, FS716 RW $0 RW $0
~iln:,ad N. OF ROUTE 250 CON $99,000 CON $g9,000
rATE ~ RAILROAD CROSSING Total $100,0~10 Total $100,000
q;u!ar 0.05 MI, ,. $o S0 $0 S0 S0 S0 $0 S0
'i ~ 18 ~, 10/1/01
L 0637 DICK WOODS ROAD PE $25,000 PE $2§,000
~: 11125 0~37-O02-P52.NS01 RW $30,000 RW $30,000 UNPAVEDROAD
o~tract ROUTE 635 CON $1,045,000 ~ON $1,045,000 CONST. STARTED OCT. 2000
TATE ~ RT, 682 Total $1,100,000 rofat $t,100,000
rl~. 19 110 , 1011/00
t 0791 MIDWAY ROAD, PE $10,000 ~E $10,000
: 11128 0791-O02,P56,N~01 RW $15,000 ~W $15,000 UNPAVED ROAD
~.p .~ ROUTE 035 CON $235,000 CON $238,000 Consl. To aegin 4-18-2001
'ATE DEAD END RTE. 791 brai $280,000 'Gte/ $200,000
~:,eved 0.73 MI. So $o $o $o $o $o $o So
I #: 20 307 11/15/00
~0~5 DURRETT RIDGE ROAD PE $5,000 PE $5,000
· 17175 0~05-O02-P57.N~01 RW $15,000 RW $15,000 UNPAVED ROAD
~ ~ GREENE CO. LINE CON $280,000 CON $280,000 ~ Const. Started Merch 200 f
FATE 0.83 ME GREEN~= CL ToWI S300,0~0 Total S300,000
~ 0.83 Mt, '* $o $o $o $8 So SO So $o
i ~ 21 ~ 93 1111
Date: 4/5101
e5of8
District: Culpeper : SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: ' 2001-02 through 2006-07
~_oule RoadNeme EsflmatedCost I PreviousFundlng Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balanceto Scope of Work
PMS ID Project # ' Funding Complete FHWA #
ccompllshment FROM Required
Comments
y'pe of Funds: TO 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
!/pa of Project Length
riofity # Traffic Count AD Date:
i
· 0633 HEARDS MT. RD.: PE $20,000PE $0
: 54428 0833-002-P .N : RW 540,000RW $0
nb'ad NELSON CO. LIN~ CON $300,000 CON $0 UNPAVED ROAD NO RIGHT OF WA Y
'ATE ROUTE 834
Total $360,000 Tolaf $0
~paved 0.50 MI.
r #: 28 50 10/1/04 $360,000 $0 $92,723 $120,451 $146,820 50 s0 $0
0~06 :)ICKERSON RoAb PE $20,000 =E $0
54429 960~-002-P ,N RW $60,000 ~W $0
ntra~ ROUTE ~0 CON $1,200,000 '~ON $0 UNPAVED ROAD NO RIGHT OF WA Y
~ATE ' ROUTE 1030
Tolal $t,260,000 Total $0
~p~ved I . ~9 MI.
i ~ 29 170 1011/06 $1,260,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 5650,000 5280,000 $0
.0769 BEAM ROAD PE $10,000 PE $0 GRADE & PA~E GRAVEL RD.
0769-002.P ,N RW $15,000 RW $0
ntra~ RTE. 1484 CON $t75,000 CON $0 '
'ATE END STATE MAINT. Tolal $200,000 TofM $0
~paved 0.27 MI
Iff: 30 50 1011/06 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 5117,4~,)8 $82,502 $0 $0
· 0623 WOODS EDGE ROAD PE S1§,000 PE $0 GRADE & PAVE GRAVEL RD.
0623~02-P ,N RW $30.000 RW $0
~ 0.5 MI. $. RT. 616 CON $300,000 CON $0
'ATE END STATE MAIN'r. Total $345,000 Total $0
~aved 0,go MI.
#: 31 140 10/t/06 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $t50,000 $tgs,o00 S0
0784 DOCTORS CROSSING RD. PE 525,000 bE $0 GRADE & PAVE GRAVEL RD.
0784-002-P ,N RW $50,000 ~W $0
fa'ac~ ' ROUTE ~00 ' CON $1,100,000 ~ON $0
ATE ROUTE 840 total $'l,176,000 rolm $0
~ 2.g MI.
#: 32 360 1011/08 $'l,178,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $143,917 $$5t,419 S479,664
;e 7 of 8 Date: 415/01
Distrlcl: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
2001-02 through 2006-07
~ Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to
! Funding
' Required Complete
i 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Coun~Totala TOtal A ocated: $108,258,650 $25,188,129 $83,070,521 $4,745,734 $5,420,873 $5,845,379
i S8,O71.091 $6,334.556 $6.334.568 $48,318,332
Repod Totals i PE $12,~0,4~ $6,500,974 $5,559,420 $1,22o,~o $606,353 $373.632 $824,~3 $l,132,139 $494,539 $1,t07,920
~ RW $23,1~,550 $6,270,118 $16,836,432 $66o,732 $1,6§1.$60 $978,673 $1,o25,61o S2,515,521 $1,018,139 $9,056,207
i CON $73.091.700 $12.417.037 $60.674.663 $2.835.002 $3.262,970 s4,492.774 $4,420,938 $2.686,896 $4.821.878 $38,154,205
Odt~lnal Allocation: $4.745,734 $5,420,873 $5,846,379 $6,071,091 $8,334,556 S6.334,656
Balance $o $o S0 $0 $o S0
I
age 8 of 8
Date: 4/5/01
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PriORITY LIST FOR SECONDARY
2001-02 Through 2006-07
VDOT's County's
Priority Proposed
List Ranking
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED BY THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON APRIL 4, 2001
Route Number and Name Location Estimated Estimated Description/Comments
From - To Advertisement Cost
Date
ATTACHMENT B
N/A N/A
1
5
7
$
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
P~rojects ~n bold are ~n me
606 Dickerson Road Intersection of Rt. 743
Jun-02 $6.500,000
Month-Year
1 County wide County wide Jun-07 $850.000
1 County wide Traffic mgmt. Program Jun-07 $300,000
2 625 Hat-ton Ferry Hatton Ferry Jun-07 $120,000
3 West Leigh Drive Rt 250 to .4 mi nor. Rt. 250 Aug-02 $50~).000
4 Meadow Creek Parkway Melbourne Rd to Rio Road Jul-02 $14,505,100
4 Meadow Creek Parkway Bridge over CSX RR Jul-02 $2,204,500
5 649 Airport Road Route 29 to Route 606 Jul-03 $10,944,050
6 651 Free State Road Free State Road Jul-05 $3,350,000
7 Meadow Creek Parkway Route 631 to Route 29 Jan-15 $37,500,000
8 691 Jarmans Gap Road Route 240 to Route 684 Aug-05 $5,150,000
9 649 Profit Road Route 29 to Route 819 Aug-06 $9,500,000
10 601 Old Ivy Road Ivy Road to 250/29 Byp Aug-08 $7,200,000
11 656 Georgetown Road Route 654 to Route 743 Dec-08 $3,200,000
12 781 Sunset Avenue NCL to Old Rt. 631 Oct-08 $1,050,000
13 631 Old Lynchburg Road 1.35 MI. S. 1-64 to Rt.708 Dec-08 $2,000,000
14 726 James River Road Route 795 to Route 1302 Dec-08 $800,000
15 679 Grassmere Road .25 miles south of Rt 738 Jun-0i $100.000
16 625 Hat'ton Ferry Road 75 miles south of to RR Dec-00 $100,000
Development Area.
relocated to meet FAA requi'rements, funded w/Fed. Funds. proj. will extend runway
signs,pipe,plant mix projects same funding
Staff working with VDOT f~r traffic calming in the Hollymead a,rea in 2001-02
operation of ferry [220]
rural addition
plans being dev. with citizen adv. cmt., includes bridge over CSX RR
widen to four lanes (associated with project above)
widen to four lanes, bike lanes,sidewalks,RS98/99 [14,800]
substandard bridge in Developed Area,project may build a new connector road [420]
new road, County also petitioning for eligib, for primary road funding RS 97/98
serve increased traf w/rain widening, ped/bike access,RS 1999/00 [2,100]
CATS recom.,improve sight distance and alignment,bikelsidewalk,RS2002103 I3,000]
widen, improve align, bike/sidewalk access,RS 2000/01 [§,400]
spot improvement, pedestrain access,urban cross-section, RS 97~98 [14,000]
spot improvements at various locations. RS 2005~06
spot mprovements at various locations RS01/02 [2,500]
spot improve, improve sight distance. RS02/03 [720]
Railroad crossing with no lights or gate [370]
Railroad crossing with no lights or gate. [220]
VDOT's
Priority
List
County's
Proposed
Ranking
Route Number and Name
Location
From - To
Estimated
Advertisement
Date
Month-Year
Estimated
Cost
Description/Comments
17
18
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
N/A
N/A
28
29
3O
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
744 Hunt Club Road
West Leigh Drive
810 Browns Gap Road
676 Tilman Road Road
678 Owensville Road
795 Blent~e~m Road
606 Dickerson Road
795 James Monroe Pky
Southern Parkway
N/A
643 Polo Grounds Road
641 Frays Mill Road
641 Frays Mill Road
631 Rio Road
743 Earlysville Road
684 Half Mile Brancl~ Road
641 Burnley Station Road
708 Dry Bddge Road
602 Howardsvilie 'f'npk
640 Gilbert Station Road
642 Red Hill Depot Road
671 Millington Road
692 Plank Road
708 Red Hill Road
Hillsdale Drive
near intersection with Rt. 22
Rt 250 to .4 mi nor. Rt, 250
Intersection of Route 789
Intersection of Route 250
Intersection of Route 250
Intersection of Route 790
Route 649 to Route 743
Intersection of Route 53
Avon Str. to Fifth Str,
Route 240 to Route 250
Route 29 to Route 649
Rt, 641 @ Jacob Run
Rt. 641 @ Jacob Run
Rio Rd @ Pen Park Lane
Rivanna River to Rt 643
Rt. 691 to Rt. 797
Norfolk Southern RR
Railroad overpass
.01 miles south Route 626
Norfolk Southern RR
.28 miles northeast Rt.708
Intersection of Route 665
Route 29 to Route 712
Route 20 to Route 29
Greenbrier Dr. to Seminole Sq.
Aug-01
Oct-01
$10.000
$100,000
$550,000
$200,000
$650,000
$300,000
$1,200,000
$350,000
$4,000,000
N/A
$1,500,000
$440 000
$60.000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
-Railroad crossing with no lights or gate. Hazard elimin, safety funds
Railroad crossing with no lights or gate.
Intersection improvement. RS 2003/04.[2,000]
intersection improvement, RS 2003/04 [4,800]
intersection improvement [2,800]
intersection improvement. [570]
'reprove to handle projected traffic, CATS recommm. RS 2002/03 [5,800]
recommended from CATS .intersection improvement. RS 2005/06 [2,800]
will be constructed to serVe development as it occurs
interconnect of future neighborhood streets as needed
public req. to improv align, spot improv, safety related. RS2 004/05 [750]
install box culvert,RS 2005-06. not a County priority,a VDOT recommendedsafety project
install box culvert, no County Priority,a VDOT recommended safety project
Inter, improve, requested by City, to be funded from private source [25,000]
public request to imDrov align, spot improv, safety related. RS 2004/05 [8,300]
spot/safety improvement to serve increased traffic w/ minimum widening [680]
bridge project with Iow sufficiency rating [340]
school transp. Dept. request, Iow weight limit
Railroad crossing with no lights or gate [390]
bridge project with Iow sufficiency rating [170]
Railroad crossing with no gate [100]
intersection improve merit [370]
spot improvements, safety related [1,500]
rn prove alignment [1,200]
new connector road between Hillsdale Rd and Hydraulic Rd, most of project is located in City limits
Projects ~n bol~3 are ~n tl~e Development Area. 13
VDOT's
Priority
List
County's
Proposed
Ranking
Route Number and Name
Location
From - To
Estimated
Advertisement
Date
Month-Year
Estimated
Cost
Description/Comments
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Projects m bold are in the
40 601 Garth Road
41 676 Ownesville Road
42 691 Park Road
43 678 Decca Lane
44 616 Union Mill Road
45 743 Advance Mills Road
46 732 Milton/Road
47 795 Hardware Street
48 622 Albevanna Springs Rd
49 622 Albevanna Springs Rd
50 611 Garmans Gap Road
51 1310 Ferry Street
52 682 Broadaxe Road
53 813 Starlight Road
54 676 Owensville Road
55 637 Dick Woods Road
56 791 Wyant lane
57 605 Durrett Ridge Road
58 679 Grassmere Road
59 615 Lindsay Road
60 737 Mountain Vista Road
61 708 Secretarys Road
62 702' Reservoir Road
63 640 Gilbert Station Road
Development Area.
Intersection of Route 658
Route 614 to Route 1050
Park Road to Route 250
Intersection of Route 676
FCL to Route 759
At Jacobs Run
Intersection of 762
Near inter, with Rt. 20
Intersection of Route 795
Intersection of Rou[e 773
Off Route 691
.05 miles south of Rt. 6
Off Dick Woods Road
Off Route 712
Intersection of Route 601
Route 635 to Route 692
Route 635 to Dead end
.83 from Greene County
Route 738 to Dead end
Route 639 to Louisa CL
Route 6 to Route 726
Route 795 to Route 620
Ramp to Dead end
Route 641 to Route 747
Oct-00
Nov~00
Nov-00
Nov~00
Apr-01
Aug-02
Jan-03
Dec-04
Oct-03
$1,100,000
$260000
$300 000
$300.000
$220,000
$65O,OOO
$825.000
$1,400,000
$360,000
-add turn ng lane at Barracks Farm Road, CATS recomm. [6,400]
spot improvements at several points, CATS recomm. [2,300]
extend to eastern 240/250 street system [600]
improve intersection, located near school. CATS recomm[1,900],
improve alignment
improve approach to bridge
spot improvement, requested by public
spot imrovement, requested by Scottsvilie
intersection improvement ,
intersection improvement
Railroad crossing with no gate
Railroad crossing with no gate
spot improvements, public request
school request,needs turn-around space
intersection 'm provement
unpaved road, R-O-W available
unpaved road, R-O-W available
unpaved road, R-O-W available
unpaved road full R-O-W available
unpaved road, R-O~W available
unpaved road, R-O~W available
unpaved road. full R-O-W not available
[4,100]
[1,000]
[1,0oo]
[570]
[710]
[710]
[230]
[8o]
[120]
[6o]
[4800]
[132]
[240]
[110]
[370]
[230]
[260]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined, sidewalks
unpaved road, public request. R-O-W undetermined [240]
VDOT's
Priority
List
County's
Pro ~osed
Ranking
Route Number and Name
Location
From - To
Estimated
Advertisement
Date
Month-Year
Estimated
Cost
Description/Comments
28
29
3O
31
32
64
65
66
67
68
69
7O
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
8O
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
633 Heards Mtn Road
606 Dickerson road
769 Beam Road
623 Woods Edge Rd
784 Doctors Crossing
712 Coles Crossing Rd
647 Maxfield Road
666 Allen Road
734 Bishop Hill Road
640 Gilbert Station Road
685 Bunker Hill Road
645 Wildon Grove Rd
712 North Garden Road
668 Wa nut Level Road
712 Coles Crossing Rd
762 Rose Hi Church Ln
682 Broad Axe Rcad
678 Owensville Road
760 Red Hill School Road
608 Happy Creek Road
674 Sugar Ridge Road
723 Sharon Road
707 Blair Park Road
769 Rocky Hollow Road
Nelson CL to Route 634
Route 850 to Route 1030
Off Route 20 north
Route 616 to dead end
Route 600 to Route 640
Rt. 711 to Rt. 692
Rt.22 to Dead end
Route 664 to Dead end
Route 795 to Rt. 1807
Route 784 to Route 20
Route 616 to Dead end
Rt. 608 to Orange CL
Route 29 to Route 760
Rt. 810 to dead end
Rt. 713 to Rt. 795
Rt. 732 to Deand End
Rt. 637 to 1-64
Route 676 to Route 614
Route 29 to RHES
Route 645 to Route 646
Route 614 to Route 673
Route 6 to Route 626
Rt. 691 to Dead end
Rt. 1484 to Dead end
Oct-06
Oct~06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-08
$360.000
$1,280,000
$200,000
$345.000
$1,175.000
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
unoaved
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
uopaved
unpaved
unpaved
unoaved
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
u~paved
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
unpaved
road.
road,
road,
road,
road,
road.
road.
road,
road
road
road,
road,
road,
road.
road,
road,
'oad,
road,
road
road,
road,
road,
road,
road,
public request, R-O-W undetermined [60]
public request. R-O-W undetermined [360]
public request, R-O-W undetermined [780]
public rec~ uest, R-O~W undetermined [420]
public request, R-0-W undetermined [360]
public request, R-O-W undetermined [250]
public request. R-O-W undetermined [470]
public request R-O-W undetermined [220]
public request, R-O-W undetermineo [180]
R-O-W no[ available [170]
public request. R-O-W undetermined [150]
public request. R-O-W undetermined [140]
R-O-W not available [140]
public request. R-O-W undeterminec E130]
BOS request, R-O-W undetermined [130]
BOS request, R-O-W
R-O-W not available
R-O-W not available
public request, R-O-W
public request, R-O-W
public request. R-O-W
public request, R-O-W
R-O-W undetermined
public request. R-O-W
undetermined [130]
[120]
[120]
undetermined [ 120]
undetermined [100]
undetermined [80]
undetermined [70]
[70]
undetermined [45]
· ' Currently not et~g~e~e not for VDOT funding
$119,508,650
i ] Most Current Average Daily Trios
RS - Revenue Sharing
15
Secondary System
County: Albemarle
Construction Program
Estimated Allocations
ATTACHMENT C
New Surface
Fiscal Year Treatments Federal Other
Total
2002-03 $882,177 $4,143,670 $445.000 $5,470.847
2003-04 $868,894 $4,489.851 $70,000 $5,428,745
2004-05 $927,325 $4,637,949 $170,000 $5,735,274
2005-06 $999.736 $4,527,964 $565,656 $6,093,356
2006-07 $1,013,809 $4,759,205 $408,137 $6,181,1 51
2007-08 $1,013,809 $4,703,495 $463,847 $6,181,1 51
Totals
$5,705,750 $27,262,134 $2,122,640
$35,090,524
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02
J.L. Bryan
VDOT Resident Engineer
Date
Robe~W Tucke~
Chairman Clerk Co. Administrator
Date
Page l' of 8 16
Distnct Culpeper
County: Albemarle
Board Approval Date::
Route
pPMS ID
Accomplishment
Type of Funds:
Type of Project
Priority # ,
Rt. 8000
ID: OWl
State Forces
sTATE
County-Wide incidental
Pn #: 0
Rt. 8001
ID: CWl
Contract
STATE
County-Wide incidental
Pti #: 0
Rt, 0625
ID:
State Forces
STATE
Regular
Pti #: 2
Rt. 9999
ID: 56085
Contract
STATE
Regular
Pti #: 3
Rt. 0631
ID: 2530
Contract
BR
Regular
Pri #: 4
Rt. 0631
D: 2530
Contract
STP
Regular
Pri ~: 4
1/1 f02
Proiec!# [
FROM I
TO I
LenCh
AB Date:
Traffic Count
Total County-Wide Allocation PE $0
CWl RW $o
PE INSTALL., CON $825,000
SEEDING Total $825,000
,IEW PLANT MIX
711102
0
Total County-Wide Allocation PE $0
cwl ~W $0
TRAFFIC CALMING CON $300,000
VARIOUS LOC. Total $300,000
0
'ON FERRY
0625-002-
OPERATE HAT?ON
FERRY
(BUDGET ITEM}
22O
lEST LEIGH DRIVE
9999-002-269,C501
~oute 250
0.4 N. RTE. 250
0.4 MI.
0
MclNTIRE RD. EXT,
0631-002-128,B612
BRIDGE OVER
MEADOWCREEK
0
MclNTIRE RD. EXTENDED
0631-002-126,C502
NCL cHARLOTTESVILLE
CSX RAILROAD
1.37 MI,
0
Previous Funding
PE $0
~W $0
:ON $0
$0
$0
RW $0
;ON $0
$o
7/t/02
PE $0 PE $0
RW $0 ~W $0
CON $120,000 ;ON $0
Total $120,000 $0
7/I/02
¢'E $20,000 $20,000
RW $20,000 RW $20,000
CON $460,000 ;ON $210,000
total $500,000 $250,000
[~/1/02
PE $150,000 PE $150,000
RW $0 IRW $0
CON $2,054,500 ICON $2,054,500
Total $2;204,500 Total $2,204,500
~'1/04 _ .
PE $1.205,000 PE
RW $2,403,000 RW
CON $9,016,600 CON
Total 12.624,600 Total
)1104
$1,205,000
$2,403,000
$7,529,684
$1%137,684
SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(in dollars)
2002-03 through 2007-08
Additional
Funding
Required
$825,000
$300,000
$120,000
$250,000
S0
Sl,486,916
PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS
~2002-03 2003-04_~~2004-05 2005-06 ~2006'07
$125,000
$50,000
$20,000 .
$250,000
$0
$1,486,916
$o
$50,000
$20.000
$0
$0
S0
$100,000 $100,000
$50,000 $50,000
$20,000 $20,000
SO $0
SO
$o
$o
$o
$1o0,00o
$50,000
$20,000
SO
$o
$o
$100,000
$50,000
$20,000
S0
S0
$0
Balance to
Complete
Scope of Work
FHWA #
Comments
~,UDGET ITEM
2003-04 $150,000 SIGNAL ~ RT
63'1/164
~ev. Sh. 2003-4 $300000
$300,000
SO
So
SO
SO
$o
Date:
Prelim. Engineering 200%02
Hollyrneade Dr.
RURAL ADDITION
2-lane Bridge
qEW ALIGNMENT-2 lanes
10/4/01
District: Culpeper _ SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02 2002-03 through 2007-08
Route Road Name Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
PPMS ID Project # Funding Complete FHWA #
Accomplishmer)t FROM Required
Comments
Type of Funds: TO
· 2002-03 · 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Type of Project Length
Priori~ # Traffic Count AD Date:
Rt. 0631 MclNTIRE RD. EXT. PE $50,000 ~'E $50,000
ID: 2530 0631-002-128,B657 RW $0 ~W $0
Contract BRIDGE OVER CSX RR CON $1,830,500 CON $1,830,500
BR NEW ALIGNMENT Total $1,880,600 Total $1,880,600
Regular
Pti #: 4 0 6/1f04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0649 AIRPORT ROAD PE $1,237,400 PE $1,237,400 4-LANE DIVIDED
ID: 2456 0649-002-158,C501 RW $4,856,550 RW $3,743,209
Contract ROUTE 29
CON $4,850,100 CON $0 ,,, ~. ~ REVENUE SHARING $1,000.000 1998-
STP ROUTE 606 Total '10,944,060 Total $4,980,609 99
Regular 0.83 MI. Paid
· URBAN DESIGN WI S.W. & BIKE LANF
Pti #: 5 13411 7/1/03 $8,963,441 $1,749,974 $2,870,148 $1,343,319 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rt. R000 FREE STATE ROAD CONNECTO PE $600,000 PE $600,000 g 2-LANE DESIGN
ID: 52393 R000-002-259,C501 RW $750,000 RW $502,641
Contract RIO ROAD
CON $2,000,000 CON $0 REVENUE SHARING $1,000,000 1995-
STP ROUTE 651 Total $3,350,000 Total $1,102,641 96
Regular 0.70 MI Paid
Pri #: 6 0 7/1/05 $2,247,369 $0 $36,882 $1,264,183 $646,294 $0 $0 $0
Rt. R000 MEADOWCREEK PKY. PE $4,200,000 PE $1,502,365 ~ NEW ALIGNMENT
ID: 12981 R000-002-253,PE101 RW $6,500,000 RW $0
Contract RIO ROAD
CON 26,800,000 CON $0 REVENUE SHARING $800,000 1997-
STP RTE. 29 Total 37,500,000 Total $1,502,365 98
Regular 3.6 MI Paid
Pri #: 7 0 1/1/15 $35,997,635 ~92,118 $226,005 $432,681 $500,000 $312,610 $500,000 $33,~J34,221
'~t. 0691 jARMAN GAP ROAD PE $650,000 PE $308,209
ID: 11129 0691-002-258,C501 RW $1,300,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 240
CON $3,200,000 CON $0 REVENUE SHARING 1999-2000
STP ROUTE 684 - Total $5,150,000 Total $308,209 $1,000,000
Regular 1.5 MI. 2-LANE URBAN WIS. W. & BIKE LANES
Pri #: 8 2118 12/1/04 $4,641,791 $700,000 $1,260,000 $696,771 $637,131 $658,889 $0 $1,000,000
Rt. 0649 PROFFIT RD. PE $1,500,000 PE $1,000,000
ID,: 54415 0649-002- ,C RW $3,000,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 29
CON $5,000,000 CON $0 REVENUE SHARING $1.000.000 2006-
STP 1.6 MI. E. RTE. 29 Total $9,600,000 Total $1,000,O00 ' 07
Regular 1.60 ML
2-LANES RURAL W/BIKE LANES
Pri#: 9 2273 8/1/06 $8,600,000 $114,662 $106,816 $901,996 $1,688,326 $3,387,706 $1,303,495 $1,000,000
PRn¢, ~ nf R
Date 10/4/01
o,str~ct. C.u, pe~er SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(in dollars)
County: Albemane 2002-03 through 2007-08
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/UZ
~oute Road Name Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
, . . Funding Complete :HWA #
'PMS ID Project # Required Comments
~ccomplishment :ROM .,
'ype of Funds: TO 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
'ype of Project Length
· . Traffic Count AD Date:
It. O6Ol OLD IVY ROAD PE $950,000 PE $910,000
::): 8807 0601-002-237,C501 RW' $2,500,000 RW $0 REV. SHARING $1,000,000 2000-01
:.ontract ROUTE 250 CON $3,750,000 CON $0 3-LANES W/S.W, & BIKE LANES
;TP RTE. 29 BYPASS Total $7,200,000 Total $910,000
~egular 0.7 $6,290,000 $0 $0 $0 $244,539 $200,000 $2,000,000 $3,845,46t
'ri #: 10 4358 8/1/08 SPOT iMPROVEMENTS
'.t. 0656 GEORGETOWN ROAD PE $600,000 PE $600,000
O: 12982 0658-002-254,C501 RW $600,000 RW $100,000 REVENUE SHARING $200,000 1997-
;ontract ;~OUTE 654 CON $2,000,000 CON $0 98
;TP ROUTE 743 Total $3,200;000 Total $700,000 2.LANES W/ S.W. & BIKE LANES
,~egular 0.8 MI.
'ri #: 11 13500 12/1/08 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $200,000 $300,000 $1,600,000 2-LANE URBAN W/SW & BIKE LANE
.'t. 0781 SUNSET AVE. PE $250,000 PE $0-
): 17171 0781-002- ,C RW: $450,000 RW $0 REVENUE SHARING $1,000, O00 200;
;ontract NCL CH'VlLLE CO/'8 $950,000 CON $0 06
;TATE OLD RTE. 631 Total $1,660,000 Total $0
~egular 0.5 MI.
'ri #: 12 1108 10/1/03 $1,660,000 $0 $0 $0 $395,656 $143,598 ! $110,746 $1,000,000
',t. 0631 OLD LYNCHBURGH RD. PE $250,000 PE $0
.~: 15329 0631-002- ,C RW ' $250,000 RW $0 REVENUE SHARING 2001-02
;ontract 1.35 MI.S. 1-64 CON $1,000,000 CON $0 $1,000,000
;TP RTE. 708 Total $1,600,000 Total $0 SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
{egular 5.0 MI. $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $114,674 $100,000 $300,000 $985,326
{t. 0726 JAMES RIVER ROAD PE $150,000 PE $0
' _~: 17170 0726-002- ,C RW' $200,000 ~W $0 REVENUE SHARING $200,000 2002-
;ontract ROUTE 795 CON $450,000 CON $0 03 .
I ,TATE ROUTE 1302 Total $800,000 rotal $0 SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
! ~,egular 1.0 MI. $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,539 $100,000 $605,461
i 'ri #: 14 1200 · 12/1/08 I LIGHTS & GATES -
, ,,t. 0679 RAILROAD CROSSING PE $3,000 PE $3,000 ~
~ 9:17172 0679-002-260,FS713 RW $1,000 RW $1,000
. ;ontract 0.25 MI S. RT. 738 CON $96,000 CON $96,000
~RP. (LIGHTS & GATES) Total $100,000 Total $100,000
I (egular 0.05 MI. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
'ri #: 15 485 12/1/01
Date: 10/4/01 19
age 4 of 8
District: Culpeper
Countyl Albemarle
Board Approval Date::
Route
PPMS ID
Accomplishment
Type of Funds:
Type of Project
Priority #
Rt. 0744
ID: 54460
Railroad
RRP
Regular
Pri #: 16
Rt. 0810
ID: 54413
Contract
STP
Regular
Pti#: 17
Rt. 0795
Contract
STATE
Regular
Pri#: 18
Rt. 0615
ID: 54422
SAAP
STATE
Unpaved
Pti #: 19
Rt. 0737
ID: 54425
Contract
STATE
Unpaved
Pti #: 20
Rt. 0708
Conlrac!
STATE
Unp?ved
Pri #: 21
~'age 5 of 8
FROM
TO
Length
Traffic Count
1/1/02
Estimated Cost
AD Date:
Previous Funding
HUNT CLUB ROAD
0744-002-S63,FS715
NEAR INT. RTE. 22
RAILROAD CROSSING
0.05
64O
BROWN'S GAP ROAD
0810-002- ,C
INT. ROUTE 789
(NEAR CROZET)
0.3 MI.
1807
BLENHEIM ROAD
0795-002- ,C
INT. ROUTE 790
NEAR SCOTTSVILLE
0.3 MILES
1551
LINSDAY ROAD
0615-002-P64,NS01
ROUTE 639
LOUISA CO, LINE
0.50 MI.
237
MOUNTAIN VISTA RD.
0737-002-P ,N
ROUTE 6
1.19 MLE. RT. 6
1.19
75 12/1/02
SECRETARYS ROAD PE
0708-002-P77, N501
RW
0.7 M.W. RTE. 795
CON
0.28 M.W. RT. 620
Total
2.09
151 1/1/03
PE $1,000
RW $0
CON $9,000
Total $10,000
2/1/02
PE $75,000
RW $75,000
CON $400,000
Total $560,000
9/1/10
PE $50,000
RW $50,000
CON $200,000
Total $300,000
10/1/10
PE $10,000
RW $10,000
CON $200,000
Total $220,000
11/1/01
PE $20,000
RW $20,000
CON $610,000
Total $660,000
$30,000
$50,000
$745,000
$826,0O0
PE $1,000
RW $0
CON $9,000
To~I $10,000
PE $0
RW $0
CON $0
To~l $0
PE $0
~W $0
CON $0
To~l $0
PE $18.000
RW $10,000
CON $200,000
ro~l $220,000
PE $20.000
RW $20,000
CON $610 000
To~l $660,000
PE $30.0OO
RW $50,000
CON $417,355
To~l $497,366
Additional
Funding
Required
SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(in dollars)
2002-03 through 2007-08
PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIO NS
2002-03 ~
$o $o
$550,000 $0
$300,000 $0
$327,645
$0 $0
$0
$222.171
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$105.474 ,L.- $0
$0
$0
$0
$0.
$0.
$0 $o
$o $300,oo0
$o $83,101
$o $0
$o $o
$o $o
Balance to Scope of Work
Complete FHWA #
Comments
GATES & LIGHTS
$0
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
$250,000
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
$216,899
$0
UNPAVED ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY A VAIl_ABLE
$0
UNPAVED ROAD. RIGHT OF WA Y
AVAILABLE
UNPAVED ROAD PARTIAL RIGHT OF
WAY
$0
D~stnct Culpeper
County: Albemarle
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02
Route
PPMS ID
Accomphshment
Type of Funds:
Type of Proiect
Priority # ,
Rt 0702
ID: 54426
Contract
STATE
Unpaved
Pri ti/: 22
Ri 0640
ID: 54427
Contract
STATE
Unpaved
Pti #: 23
Rt. 0633
ID: 54428
Contract
sTATE
Unpaved
Pri #: 24
Rt. 0606
iD: 54429
Contract
STATE
Unpaved
Pri #: 25
Rt. 0769
ID:
Contract
STATE
Unpaved
Pti #: 26
Rt. 0623
ID:
SAAP
STATE
Unpaved
Pri #: 27
Road Name
Project #
FROM
TO
Length
Traffic Count
RESERVOIR ROAD
0702-002-P ,N
ROUTE 29 RAMP
DEAD END
2.4 MI
4O6
;~ERT STATION RD.
0640-002-P .N
ROUTE 641
:~OUTE 747
0.70 MI.
230
VlT,RD.
,N
NELSON CO, LINE
634
0.50 MI.
59
DICKERSON ROAD
0606-002-P ,N
ROUTE 850
ROUTE 1 O30
1.99 MI.
170
BEAM ROAD
0769-002-P ,N
RTE. 1484
STATE MAINT.
0.27 MI
5O
WOODS EDGE ROAD
0623-002-P ,N
0.5 MI. S. RT. 616
END STATE MAINT.
0.90 Mi.
140
Estimated Cost
AD Date:
PE $20,000
RW $40,000
CON $1,340,000
Total $1,400,000
12/1/04
PE $20,000
RW $40,000
CON $300,000
Total $360,000
1 O'1/03
PF_. $20,000
RW $40,000
CON $300,000
Total $360,000
1 £1/1/04
PE $20.000
:~W $60,000
CON $1.200,000
To~:al $1,280,000
0t1/06
PE $10,o00
RW $15,000
CON $175,000
Total $200,000
10/1/06
PE $15,000
RW $50,000
CON $300,000
$36~ ,000
0/1106
Previous Funding
PE $20,000
RW $40,000
CON $65,000
Total $126,000
PE $0
RW $0
CON $0
PE $0
~W $0
2ON $0
Total $0
PE $0
RW $0
;ON $0
'oral $0
DE $0
RW $0
CON $0
Fotal $0
PE $0
RW $0
CON $0
Total $0
Additional
Funding
Required
SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(in dollars)
2002-03 through 2007-08
PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-0~
$1,275,000
$360,000
$360,000
$1.280,000
$200,000
$365.000
$~t7,283
$220,000
$92,723
$0
$0
$0
$502,963
$140,000
$120,457
$0
$0
$0
$366,987
$0
$146,820
$296,020
$117.498
$0
$57,767
$0
$0
$0 $0
$565,550 $360,663
$82,502 $0
$150,000 $195,000
$0
$0
$0
$57.767
Balance to
Complete
Scope of Work
FHWA #
Comments
$o
$o
$o $o
UNPAVED ROAD
NO RIGHT OF WAY
UNPAVED ROAD NO RIGHT OF WA'(
UNPAVED ROAD NO RIGHT OF WAY
UNPAVED ROAD NO RIGHT OF WAY
'"'~RADE & PAVE GRAVEL RD,
GRADE & PAVE GRAVEL RD.
$20'00o-a,~,-,''~$o
Date: 10/4/01
21
Page 6 of 8
District: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02 2002-03 through 2007-08
Route Road Name Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
PPMS ID Project # Funding Complete
Accomplishment FROM Required FHWA #
~ Comments
Type of Funds: TO
Type of Proiect Length 2002-03 2003-0_4... 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Priority # Traffic Count AD Date:
I
RI. 0784 DOCTORS CROSSING RD. PE $25,0'00 PE $0 GRADE & PAYE GRAVEL RD.
ID: 0784-002-P ,N RW $75,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 600
CON $1,138,105 CON $0
STATE ROUTE 640
Total $1,238,105 Total $0
Unpaved 2.9
Pti#: 28 360 10/1/08 $1,238,105 $0 $0 $0 $143,917 $458,146 $636,042 $0
Rt. 0712 COLES CROSSING ROAD PE $50,000 PE $0 RECONSTRUCT & REPLACE BRIDG
ID: 2307 0712-002-PO2,N501 RW $50,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 692
CON $350,000 CON $0
STATE ROUTE 760
Total $450,000 Total $0 '
Unpaved 0.6 MILES
Pri#: 29 193 611/09 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $150,000
22
Page 7 of 8
10,'4'01
D~stnct' Culpeper
County Albemarle
County Totals
Report Totals
Total Allocated:
PE
RW
CON
Original Allocation:
Balance
Estimated Cost
$107,556,755
$12,181,400
$23,405,550
$71,969,805
Previous Funding
$27,578,863
Additional
Funding
Required
$79,977,892
SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(in dollars)
2002-03 through 2007-08
PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS
$6.181,151
$7,666,974
$6,889,850
$13,022,039
$4,514,426
$16,515,700
$58,947,766
$588,571 $332,821' $741,203 $944,674 $507.149 $765¢87
$1,551,550 $978,673 $908.950 $2,560,521 $1,134,799 $2,563,386
$3,330,726 $4,117.251 $4,085,121 $2,588.161 $4,539,203 $2,851,978
$5,470,847 $5,428,745 $5,735.274 $6,093,356 $6181,151 $6,181,151
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Balance to
Complete
$44,887.368
$634,221
$6.817.821
$37,435.326
Page 8 of 8
Dam:
10/4/0
23
DRAFT ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRiORI LIST FOR sECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
2002-03 Through 2007-08
[SOME PROJECTS MAY NOT BE COMPLETED AS PRIORITIZED DUE TO PROJECT COMPLEXITY AND/OR AVAILABLE FUNDING]
ATTACHMENT D
VDOT's County's Route Number and Name Location Estimated Estimated -'
Priority Proposed From - To Advertisement Cost
List Ranking Date
Description/Comments
N/A N/A 606 Dickerson Road
1
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Projects in
Intersection of Rt. 743
Jun-02 $6,500,000
Month-Year
1 County wide County wide Jun-08 $825,000
I County wide Traffic mgmt. Program Jun-08 $300,000
2 625 Hat[on Ferry Hat-ten Ferry Jun-08 $120 000
3 West Leigh Driv~ Rt 250 to .4 mi nor. Rt. 250 Aug-02 $500,000
4 Meadow Creek Parkway Melbourne Rd to Rio Road Jun-04 $t4,505,100
4 Meadow Creek Parkway Bridge over CSX RR Jun-04 $2,204,500
5 649 Airport Road Route 29 to Route 606 Jul-03 $10,944,050
6 651 Free State Road Free State Road Jul-05 $3,350,000
7 Meadow Creek Parkway Route 631 to Route 29 Jan-15 $37,500,000
8 691 Jarmans Gap Road Route 240 to Route 684 Dec-04 $5,150,000
· 9 649 Proffit Road Route 29 to Route 819 Aug-06 $9,500,000
10 601 Old Ivy Road Ivy Road to 250~29 Byp Aug-08 $7,200,000
11 656 Georgetown Road Route 654 to Route 743 Dec-08 $3,200,000
12 781 Sunset Avenue NCL to Fifth St Extended Oct-08 $1,650,000
13 631 Old Lynchburg Road 1.35 MI. S. 1-64 to Rt.708 Dec-08 $1,500,000
14 726 James River Road Route 795 to Route 1302 Dec-08 $800,000
15 679 Grassmere Road .25 miles south of Rt 738 Dec-01 $100,000
16 744 Hunt Club Road near intersection with Rt. 22 Aug-01 $10,000
bold are in the DeveJopment Area.
relocated to meet FAA requirements, funded w/Fed. Funds, proj. will extend runway
signs,pipe, plant mix projects, same funding
Staff working with VDOT.' for traffic calming in the Hollymead a;~,a in 2001-02, multi-stops, ped. X-walk
operation of ferry [240]
rural addition
plans being dev. with citizen adv. cmt., includes bridge over CSX RR
widen to four lanes (associated with project above)
widen to four lanes, bike lanes,sidewalks,RS98/99 [14,100]
substandard bridge in Developed Area,project may build a new connector road [420]
new road, County also petitioning for eligib, for primary road funding RS 97198
serve increased traf w/rain widening, peal/bike access,RS 1999/00 [2,100]
CATS recom.,improve sight distance and alignment, bike/sidewalk,RS 200612007 [3,000]
widen, improve align, bike/sidewalk access,RS 2000101 [4,300]
spot improvement, pedestrain access,urban cross-section, RS 97198 [16,000]
spot and inter. Improve., urban x-sect, upgrade 2 lan e. RS 2005106, ped/bike access
spot improvements at various locations,RS01/02 [2,500]
spot improve, improve sight distance,RS02/03 [720]
Railroad crossing with no lights or gate [250]
Railroad crossing with no lights or gate. Hazard elimin, safety funds
VDOT's
Priority
List
County's
Proposed
Ranking
Route Number and Name
Location
From - To
Estimated
Advertisement
Date
Month-Year
Estimated
Cost
Descri ption/Comments
17
18
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
N/A
N/A
27
28
29
3O
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
4O
810 Browns Gap Road
795 Blenheim Road
676 Tilman Road Road
678 Owensville Road
606 Dickerson Read
614 Garth Road
795 James fvionroe Pky
Southern ~-;arkway
N!A
643 Polo Grounds Road
641 Frays Mill Road
641 Frays Mill Road
631 Rio Road
743 Earlys'~'ille Road
729 Buck Island Rd
684 Half Mile Branch Road
641 Burnley Station Road
708 Dry Bridge Road
602 Howardsville Tnpk
640 Gilbert S~.ation Road
642 Red Hill Depot Road
671 Millingto~ Road
692 Plank Road
708 Red Hill Road
Hillsdale Drive
601 Garth Road
Intersection of Route 789
Intersection of Route 790
Intersection of Route 250
intersection of Route 250
Route 649 to Route 743
Intersection og Rt. 676
Intersection of Route 53
Avon Str. to Fifth Str.
Route 240 to Route 250
Route 29 to Route 649
Rt. 641 @ Jacob Run
Rt. 641 @ Jacob Run
Rio Rd @ Pen Park Lane
Rivanna River to Rt 643
Rt. 53 to Rt. 1120
Rt. 691 to Rt. 797
Norfolk Southern RR
Railroad overpass
.01 miles south Route 626
Norfolk Southern RR
.28 miles northeast Rt.708
Intersection of Route 665
Route 29 to Route 712
Route 20 to Route 29
Greenbrier Dr. to Seminole Sq.
intersection of Route 658
Sap- 10
Oct-10
$550,000
$300,000
$200,000
$650,000
$1 200,000
$350,000
$4,OOO,OOO
N/A
$1,5OO,OOO
$44O,OOO
$60~000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Intersection improvement. RS 2003/04.[2,000]
intersection improvement. [570]
intersection improvement, RS 2003/04 [4;800]
intersection improvement [2,800]
improve to handle projected traffic, CATS recommm., RS 2002/03 [6,000]
intersection improvement, public request 2002 [3100]
recommended from CATS, intersection improvement. RS 2005/06 [2,700]
Extend to 5th St., with pedestrian/bike facility, and Neighborhood street design/speed
interconnect of future neighborhood streets
public req. to improv align, spot improv, safety related, RS2 004/05 [750]
install box culvert,RS 2005-06, not a County priority,a VDOT recommendedsafety project
install box culvert, no County Priority,a VDOT recommended safety project
Inter. improve, requested by City, to be funded from private source [22,000]
public request to improv align, spot improv, safety related. RS 2004/05 [8,400]
improve road geometrics, two lane rural sction, VDOT request 200~ [4400]
spot/safety improvement to serve increased traffic w/ minimum widening [680]
bridge project with Iow sufficiency rating [340]
school transp. Dept. request, Iow weight limit
Rail road crossing with no lights or gate [390]
bridge project with Iow sufficiency rating [170]
Railroad crossing with no gate [80]
intersection ' mprovement [370]
spot improvements, safety related [1,200]
improve alignment [1,200]
new connector road between Hillsdale Rd and Hydraulic Rd, most of project is located in City limits
add turning lane at Barracks Farm Road, CATS recomm. [6,400]
Projects in bold are in the Development Area.
VDOT's
Priority
List
County's
Proposed
Ranking
Route Number and Name
Location
From - To
Estimated
Advertisement
Date
Month-Year
Estimated
Cost
Description/Comments
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Projects in bold are in the
41 676 Ownesville Road
42 691 Park Road
43 678 Decca Lane
44 616 Union Mill Road
45 743 Advance Mills Road
46 732 Milton Road
47 795 Hardware Street
48 _ 622 AIbevanna Springs Rd
49 622 Albevann a Springs Rd
50 680 Browns Gap Tnpk
51 611 Jarmans Gap Road
52 1310 Ferry Street
53 682 Broadaxe Road
54 813 Starlight Road
55 676 Owensville Road
58 615 Lindsay Road
57 737 Mountain Vista Road
58 708 Secretarys Road
59 702 Reservoir Road
60 640 Gilbert Station Road
61 633 Heards Mtn Road
62 608 Dickerson road
63 769 Beam Road
64 623 Woods Edge Rd
Development Area.
Route 614 to Route 1050
Park Road to Route 250
Intersection of Route 676
FCL to Route 759
At Jacobs Run
Intersection of 762
Near inter, with Rt. 20
Intersection of Route 795
Intersection of Route 773
Rt. 240 to Rt. 8~0
Off Route 691
.05 miles south of Rt. 6
Off Dick Woods Road
Off Route 712
Intersection of Route 601
Route 639 to Louisa CL
Route 6 to Route 726
Route 795 to Route 620
Ramp to Dead end
Route 64I to Route 747
Nelson CL to Route 634
Route 850 to Route 1030
Off Route 20 north
Route 616 to dead end
Apr-01
Aug-02
Jan-03
Dec-04
Oct-03
Oct-04
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
$220 000
$650 000
$825 000
$1,400 000
$360,000
$36O 000
$1,280 000
$200 000
$365 000
spot improvements at several points, CATS recomm. [2,300]
extend to eastern 240/250 street system [600]
~mprove intersection, located near school, CATS recomm[1,900]
improve alignment [4,600]
improve approach to bridge [1,000]
spot improvement, requested by public [1,000]
spot improvement, requested by Scottsville [5701
intersection improvement [710]
intersection improvement [710]
spot improvements, public request 2002 [700]
Railroad crossing with no gate [210]
Railroad crossing with no gate [80]
spot improvements, public request [120]
school request, needs turn-around space [60]
intersection improvement [4800]
unpaved road, R-O-Wavailabla [230]
un paved road, R-O-W available [60]
unpaved road, full R-O-W not available [260]
un paved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined, sidewalks
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [240]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [60]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [360]
un paved road, public request, R-O~W undetermined [780]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undeterminee [420]
VDOT's County's
Priority Proposed
List Ranking
Route Number and Name
28
29
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
9O
784 Doctors Crossing
712 Coles Cr'ossing Rd
6-47 Maxfie'ld Road
688 Midway Road
689 Pounding, Creek Rd
666 Allert Road
736 White Mtn Road
734 Bishop Hill Road
640 Gilbert Station Road
685 Bunker Hill Road
645 Wildor,, Grove Rd
712 North Garden Road
668 Waln¢. Level Road
712 Coles C~'ossing Rd
762 Rose Hill Church Ln
682 Broad Axe Road
605 Durrett Ridge Road
704 Fortune Lane
678 Owens',:i~ie Road
760 Red Hill School Road
608 Happy Creek Road
674 Sugar Ridge Road
723 Sharon Road
707 Blair Park Road
769 Rocky Hollow Road
637 Dick Woods Road
"Currently not eligible not for VDOT funding
Location
From - To
Route 600 to Route 640
Rt. 711 to Rt. 692
Rt.22 to Dead end
Rt. 635 to Rt. 624
Rt. 250 to Rt. 635
Route 664 to Dead end
Rt. 635 to Deand End
Route 795 to Rt. 1807
Route 784 to Route 20
Route 616 to Dead end
Rt. 608 to Orange CL
Route 29 to Route 760
Rt. 810 to dead end
Rt. 713 to Rt. 795
Rt. 732 to Deand End
Rt. 637 to 1-64
Rt. 743 to Swift Run
Rt. 715 to Dead End
Route 676 to Route 614
Route 29 to RHES
Route 645 to Route 646
Route 614 to Route 673
Route 6 to Route 626
Rt. 691 to Dead end
Rt. 1484 to Dead end
Rt. 691 to Rt. 692
Estimated Estimated
Advertisement Cost
Date
Month-Year
Oct-08 $1,238,105
Jun-09 $450,000
Description/Comments
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [360]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [250]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [470]
unpaved road, publi request, R.O-W undetermined [360]
unpaved road, publi request, R.O-W undetermined [340]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [220]
unpaved road, publi request, R.O-W undetermined [200]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [180]
unpaved road, R-O-W not available [170]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [150]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [140]
unpaved road, R-O-W not available [140]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [130]
unpaved road, BOS request, R-O-W undetermined [130]
unpaved road, BOS request, R-O-W undetermined [130]
unpaved road, R-O-W not available [120]
unpaved road, R-O-W not available [120]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermit [~20]
unpaved road, R-O-W not available [120]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [120]
un paved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [100]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [80]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [70]
unpaved road, R-O~W undetermined [70]
unpaved road, public request, R-O-W undetermined [45]
unpaved road, public request, R.O-W undetermiJ [20]
$117,506,755
E ] Most Current Average Daily Trips
RS - Revenue Sharing
Secondary System
County: Albemarle
Construction Program
Estimated Allocations
ATTACHMENT B
Fiscal Year
New Surface
Treatments
Federal Other Total
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
$882,177 $4,143,670 $445,000 $5,470,847
$868,894 $4,489,851 $70,000 $5,428,745
$927,325 $4,637,949 $170,000 $5,735,274
$999,736 $4,527,964 $565,656 $6,093,356
$1,013,809 $4,759,205 $408,137 $6,181,151
$1,013,809 $4,703,495 $463,847 $6,181,151
Totals
$5,7O5,75O
$27,262,134 $2,122. 640 $35.090. 524
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02
J.L. Bryan
VDOT F~esident Engineer
Date
Page 1 of 8
Robert W. Tucker.
Chairman, Clerk, Co. Administrator
Date
District: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02 2002-03 through 2007-08
Route Road Name Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
PPMS ID Project Cf Funding Complete FHWA #
Required
Accomplishment FROM Comments
Type of Funds: TO 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Type of Project Length
Priority # Traffic Count AD Date:
Rt. 8000 Total County-Wide Allocation PE $0 PE $0 BUDGET ITEM
ID: CWI CWI RW $0 ~W $0
State Forces NEW PIPE INSTALL., CON $825,000 CON $0 2003-04 $150,000 SIGNAL ~ RT
STATE SIGNS, SEEDING Total $828,000 Total $0 ~- 631/164
Rev. Sh. 2~3-4 $30000~
County-Wide Incidental NEW PLANT MIX
Pri #: 0 0 7/1/02 $825,000 $125,000 $0 $100,000~ $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $300,000
Rt. 8001 Total County-Wide Allocation PE $0 PE $0
iD: CWl CWl RW $0 RW $0
Contract TRAFFIC CALMING CON $300,000 CON $0 Prelim. Engineering 2001.02
Hollymeade Dr.
STATE VARIOUS LOC. Total $300,000 Total $0
County-Wide incidental ,
Pri #: 0 0 7/1/02 $300,000 $50,000 $50,000 $$0,000 $80,000 $50,000 $60,000 $0
Rt. 0625 HATTON FERRY PE $0 PE $0
ID: 0625-002- RW $0 RW $0
State Forces OPERATE HATTON CON $120,000 CON $0 ~
STATE FERRY Total $120,000 Total $0
Regular (BUDGET ITEM)
Pri #: 2 22O , 7/1/02 $120,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0
Rt. 9999 WEST LEIGH DRIVE PE $20,000 PE $20,000
ID: 56085 9999-002-26g,0501 RW $20,000 'RW $20,000
Contract Route 250 CON $460,000 CON $210,000 . RURAL ADDITION
STATE 0.4 N. RTE. 250 Total $500,000 Total $260,000
Regular 0.4 MI.
Pd #: 3 0 8/1/02 $260,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' $0
Rt. 0631 MclNTIRE RD. EXT. PE $150,000 PE $150,000
iD: 2530 0631-002-128,B612 RW $0 RW $0
Contract BRIDGE OVER CON $2,054,500 CON $2,054,500 2~lane Bridge
BR MEADOWOREEK Total $2,204,500 Total $2,204,600
Regular
Pri #: 4 0 6/1/04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0631 MclNTIRE RD. EXTENDED PE $1,205,000 PE $1,205,000 NEW ALIGNMENT-2 lanes
iD: 2530 0631-002-128,C502 RW $2,403,000 RW $2,403,000
Contract NCL CHARLOTTESVILLE CON $9,016,600 CON $7,529,684 " ,~
STP CSX RAILROAD Total 12,624,600 Total $11,137,684
Regular 1.37 MI.
Pti #: 4 0 6/1/04 $1,486,915. $1,486,916 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .
Page 2 of 8 Date: 10/4/0!
'District: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02 2002-03 through 2007-08
PPMsR°Ute ID ProjectR°ad Name# Estimated Cost Previous Funding AdditionaIFunding PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
Accomplishment FROM Required Complete FHWA #
Type of Funds: TO Comments
Type of Project Length 2002~03 2003~04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
'Priority# ~ Traffic Count AD Date:
Rt. 0631 MclNTIRE RD. EXT. PE $50,000 PE $50,000
ID: 2530 0631-002-128,6657 RW $0 RW $0
Contract BRIDGE OVER CSX RR
CON $1,830,500 CON $1,830,500
BR NEW ALIGNMENT
Total $1,880,800 Total $1,880,600
Regular
Pri #: 4 0 6/1/04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ~ $0
Rt. 0649 AIRPORT ROAD PE $1,237,400 PE $1,237,400 4-LANE DIVIDED
ID: 2456 0649-002-158,C501 RW $4,856,550 RW $3,743,209
Contract ROUTE 29
CON $4,850,100 CON $0 REVENUE SHARING $1,000 000 1995
STP ROUTE 606 ,
Total 10,944,050 Total $4,980,609 99
Regular 0.83 MI.
Paid
Pd #: 5 13411 7/1/03 $5,963,441 $1,749,974 $2,870,148 $1,343,319 $0 $0 $0 $0 URBAN DESIGN W/S. W. & BIKE LAN~
Rt. R000
FREE STATE ROAD CONNECTO PE $600,000 F'E $600,000 2-LANE DESIGN
ID: 52393 R000-002-259,C501 RW $750,000 RW $502,641
Contract RIO ROAD
CON $2,000,000 CON $0 REVENUE SHARING $1,000,000 1995
STP ROUTE 651
Total $3,360,000 Total $1,102,641 96
Regular 0.70 MI . Paid
Pd #: 6 0 7/1/05 $2,247,369 $0 $36,882 $1,264,183 $946,294 $0 $0 $0
Rt. RO00
MEADOWCREEK PKY. PE $4,200,000 PE $1,502,365 NEW ALIGNMENT
ID: 12981 R000-002-253,PEI01 RW $6,500,000 RW $0
Contract RIO ROAD
CON 26,800,000 ~ CON $0 REVENUE SHARING $800 000 1997-
STP RTE. 29 ,
Total 37,500,000 Total $1,502,365 98
Regular 3.8 MI Paid
Pri#: 7 0 1/1/15 $35,997,635 $92,118 $226,005 $432,681 $500,000 $312,610 $500,000 $33,934,221
Rt. 0691 ,
JARMAN GAP ROAD PE $650,000 PE $308,209
ID: 11129 0691-002-258,C501
RW $1,300,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 240
CON $3,200,000 CON $0 REVENUE SHARING 1999-2000
STP ROUTE 684
Total $5,150,000 Total $308,209f~ $1,000,000
Regular 1.5 MI. 2-LANE URBAN WIS. W. &' BIKE LANE8
~'ri #: 8 2118 12/1/04 $4,644,791 $700,000 $1,250,000 $895,771 $637,131 $668;889 $0 $1,000,000
'Ri. 0849
PROFFIT RD, PE $1,500,000 PE $1,000,000 ,
ID: 54415 0649-002- ;C RW $3,000,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 29
CON $5,000,000 CON $0 REVENUE SHARING $¢,000,000 2006-
STP 1.6 MI. E. RTE. 29
Total $8,500,000 Total $1,000,000 07
Regular 1.60 MI.
, 2~LANES RURAL W/BIKE LANES
Pri #: 9 2273 8/1/06 $8,500,000 $114,662 $106,816 $901,995 $1,685,326 $3,387,706 ~ $1,303,496 $1,000,000
3of8
Date: 10/4/01
District: ~ulpeper
County: Albemarle
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02
Route
PPMS ID
Accomplishment
Type of Funds:
Type of Project
Priority #
Rt. 0601
ID: 8807
Contract
STP
Regular
Pri #: 10
Rt, 0656
ID: 12982
Contract
STP
Regular
Pri #: 11
Rt. 0781
ID: 17171
Contract
STATE
Regular
Pri#: 12
Rt. 0631
ID: 15329
Contract
STP
Regular
Pri #: 13
Rt. 0726
ID: 17170
Contract
STATE
Regular
Pri #: 14
Rt. 0679
ID: 17172
Contract
RRP
'Regular
PrJ #:, 15
Road Name
Project #
FROM
TO
Length
Traffic Count
OLD IVY ROAD
0601-002-237, C501
ROUTE 250
RTE. 29 BYPASS
0.7
4358
GEORGETOWN ROAD
0656-002-254,C501
ROUTE 654
ROUTE 743
0.8 MI.
13500
SUNSET AVE,
0781-002- .C
NCL CH'VILLE
OLD RTE. 631
0.5 MI.
1108
OLD LYNCHBURGH RD.
0631-002- C
1.35 MI.S. 1-64
RTE. 708
5.0 MI.
1500
JAMES RIVER ROAD
0726-002- .C
ROUTE 795
ROUTE 1302
1.0 MI.
1200
RAILROAD CROSSING
0679-002-260;FS713
0.25 MI S. RT. 738
(LIGHTS & GATES)
0.05 MI.
485
Estimated Cost
Previous Funding
AD Date:
PE $950.000
RW $2,500,000
CON $3,750,000
Total $7,200,000
8/1/08
PE $600,000 PE $600,000
RW $600,000 RW $100,000
CON $2,000,000 CON $0
Total $3,200,000 Total $700,000'
12/1/08
PE $250,000 PE $0
RW $450,000 RW $0
CON $950,000 CON $0
Total $1,660,000 Total $0
10/1/08
PE $250,000 $0
RW $250,000 RW $0
CON $1,000,000 CON $0
Total $1,500.000 Total $0
12/1/08
PE $150,000 $0
RW $200,000 RW $0
CON $450,000 CON $0
Total $800,000 Total $0
12/1/08
PE $3,000 /='E $3.000
RW $1 000 RW $1,000
CON $96,000 CON $96,000
Total $100,000 Total $100,000
PE $910,000
RW $0
CON $0
To~l $910,000
12/I/01
:~age 4 of 8
SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(in dollars)
~002-03 through 2007-08
Additional
Funding
Required
2002-03
PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATiO NS
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-06
$6,290,000
$2,600,000
$1,660,000
$1,500,000
$800,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0.
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$244,539
$400,000
$395,656
$114,674
$0
$0
$200,000 $2,000,000
$200,000 $300,000
$143,698 $110,746
$100,000 $300,000
$94,639 $100,000
$0
Balance to
Complete
$3,845,461
$t ,600,000
$1,000,o00.
$985,326
$605,461
$0
Scope of Work
FHWA #
Comments
REV. SHARING $1,000,000 2000-0.~
3-LANES W/S.W. & BIKE fANES
SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
REVENUE SHARING $200,000 1997-
98
2-LANES WI S.W. & BIKE LANES
2-LANE URBAN W/SW & BIKE LANE
REVENUE SHARING $1,000,000 2005.
06
REVENUE SHARING 2001-02
$1,000,000
SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
REVENUE SHARING $200.000 2002-
03
SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
LIGHTS & GATES -
Date: 10/4/01
Disirict: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02 2002-03 through 2007-08
Route Road Name Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
PPMS ID Project # Funding Complete FHWA
Accomplishment FROM Required
,, Comments
Type of Funds: TO
Type of Project Length I 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Priority # Traffic Count AD Date: ,
Rt. 0744 HUNT CLUB ROAD
PE $1,000 PE $!,000 GATES & LIGHTS
ID: 54460 0744-002-S63,FS715 RW $0 RW $0
Railroad NEAR INT. RTE. 22 CON $9,000 CON $9,000
RRP RAILROAD CROSSING Total $10,000. Total $10,000 ....
Regular 0.05
Pri #: 16 640 2/1/02 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0810 BROWN'S GAP ROAD PE $75,000 PE $0 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
ID: 54413 0810-002- ,C RW $75,000 {W $0
Contract INT. ROUTE 789
CON $400,000 CON $0
STP (NEAR CROZET) . Total $$60,000 Total $0
Regular 0.3 MI.
Pd#: 17 ~1807 9/1/10 $550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $250,000
Rt. 0795 BLENHEIM ROAD PE $50,000 PE $0 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
ID: 0795-002- ,C RW $50,000 RW $0
Contract INT. ROUTE 790 CON $200,000 CON $0
STATE NEAR SCOTTSVILLE Total $300,000 Total
Regular 0.3 MILES
Pti#: 18 1551 10/1/10 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $83,101 $216,899
Rt. 0615 LINSDAY ROAD PE $10,000 PE $10,000
ID: 54422 0615-002-P64,N501 RW $10,000 RW $10,000
SAAP ROUTE 639
CON $200,000 CON $200,000 UNPAVED ROAD
STATE LOUISA CO, LINE Total $220,000 Total $220,000 RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABLE
Unpaved 0.50 MI.
Pri#: 19 237 11/1/01 $0 $0 $0 ' $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0737
MOUNTAIN VISTA RD. PE $20,000 PE $20,000
ID: 54425 0737-002-P ,N RW $20,000 RW $20,000
Contract ROUTE 6 CON $610,000 CON $610,000 UNPAVED ROAD RIGHT OF WAY
STATE 1.19 MI.E. RT. 6 Total $650,000 Total $650,000 AVAILABLE
Un paved 1.19 I
Pri #: 20 75 12/1/02 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0708 SECRETARYS ROAD PE . $30,000 PE $30,000
ID: 11130 0708-002-P77,N501 RW $50,000 RW $50,000
Contract 0.7 M.W. RTE. 795 CON $745,000 CON $417,355 UNPAVED ROAD PARTIAL RIGHT OF
STATE 0.28 M.W. RT. 620 Total $825,000 Total $497,366 WAY
Unpaved 2.09 ·
Pti #: 21 151 I/1/03 $327,645 i $222,171 $t05,474 $0 $0 $0 $0 · $0
~age 5 of 8 ·
Date: 10/4/01
DiStrict: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02 2002-03 through 2007-08
Route Road Name Estimated Cost i Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
PPMS ID Project # Funding Complete FHWA #
Accomplishment FROM Required Comments
Type of Funds: TO 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Type of Project Length
Priority # Traffic Count AD Date:
Rt. 0702 RESERVOIR ROAD PE $20,000 PE $20,000
ID: 54426 0702-002-P N RW $40,000 RW $40,000
Contract ROUTE 29 RAMP CON $1,340,000 CON $65,000 UNPAVED ROAD
STATE DEAD END Total $1,400,000 Total $125,000 NO RIGHT OF WAY
Unpaved 2.4 MI.
Pri#: 22 406 12/1/04 $1,275,000 $347,283 $502,963 $366,987 $57,767 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0640 GILBERT STATION RD. , PE $20,000 ;E $0
ID: 54427 0640-002-P ,N RW $40,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 641 CON $300,000 CON $0 UNPAVED ROAD NO RIGHT OF WAY
STATE ROUTE 747 Total $360,000 Total $0
Unpaved 0.70 MI.
Pri#: 23 230 10/1/03 $360,000 $220,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 ~ $0 $0
Rt. 0633 HEARDS MT.RD. PE $20,000 PE $0
ID: 54428 0633-002-P ,N RW $40,000 RW $0
Contract NELSON CO. LINE CON $300,000 CON $0 UNPAVED ROAD NO RIGHT OF WAY
STATE ROUTE 634 Total $360,000 Total $0
Unpaved 0.50 MI.
Pri#: 24 59 10/1/04 $360,000 $92,723 $120,457 $146,820 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0606 DICKERSON ROAD PE $20,000 PE $0
ID: 54429 0606-002-P ,N RW $60,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 850 CON $1,200,000 CON $0 UNPAVED ROAD NO RIGHT O? WA¥
STATE ROUTE 1030 Total $1,280,000 Total $0
Unpaved 1.99 MI.
Pri#: 25 170 10/1/06 $1,280,000 $0 $0 $296,020 $565,550 $360,663 $57,767 $0
Rt. 0769 BEAM ROAD PE $10,000 PE $0 GRADE & PAVE GRAVEL RD.
~D: 0769-002-P ,N RW $15,000 RW $0
Contract RTE. 1484 CON $175,000 CON $0
STATE END STATE MAINT. Total $200,000 Total $0
Unpaved 0.27 MI
Pti #: 26 50 10/1/06 $200,000 $0 $0 $117,498 $82,502 $0 $0 $0
Rt. 0623 WOODS EDGE ROAD PE $15,000 PE $0 GRADE & PAVE GRAVEL RD.
ID: 0623-002-P '..,N RW $50,000 :~W $0
I
SAAP 0.5 MI. S. RT. 616 CON $300,000 CON $0
STATE END STATE MAINT. Total $368,000 Total $0
Unpaved 0.90 MI.
Pri #: 27 140 10/1/06 $365,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $195,000 $20,000 $0
Page 6 of 8 Date: 10/4/01
District: Culpeper SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County: Albemarle (in dollars)
Board Approval Date:: 1/1/02 2002-03 through 2007-08
Route Road Name Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to Scope of Work
PPMS ID Project # Funding Complete FHWA #
Accomplishment FROM Required
Comments
Type of Funds: TO 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Type of Project Length
Priority # Traffic Count AD Date:
Rt. 0784 DOCTORS CROSSING RD. PE $25,000 PE $0 GRADE & PAVE GRAVEL RD.
ID: 0784-002-P ,N RW $75,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 600 CON $1,138,105 CON $0
STATE ROUTE 640 Total $1,238,105 Total $0 -.
Unpaved 2.9 MI.
Pti Ct: 28 360 10/1/08 $1,238,105 $0 $0 $0 $143,917 $468,146 $636,042 $0
Rt. 0712 COLES CROSSING ROAD PE $50,000 PE $0 RECONSTRUCT & REPLACE BRIDG
ID: 2307 0712-002-PO2,NS01 RW $50,000 RW $0
Contract ROUTE 692 CON $350,000 CON $0
STATE ROUTE 760 Total $450,000 Total $0
Unpaved 0.6 MILES
Pti Ct: 29 193 6/1/09 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $150,000
Page 7 of 8 Date: 1014/01
District: 'Cutp~per SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
County:' Albemarle (in dollars)
2002-03 through 2007-08
Estimated Cost Previous Funding Additional PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS Balance to
Funding Complete
Required
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
County Totals Total Allocated: $107,556,755 $27,578,863 $79,977,892 $5,470,847 $5,428,745 $5,735,274 $6,093,356 $6,181,151 $6,181,151 $44,887,368
Report Totals PE $12,181,400 $7,666,974 $4,514,426 $588,571 $332,821 $741,203 $944,674 $507,149 $765,787 $634,221
RW $23,405,550 $6,889,850 $16,515,700 $1,551,550 $978,673 $908,950 $2,560,521 $1,134,799 $2,563,386 $6,817,821
CON $71,969,805 $13,022,039 $58,947,766 $3,330,726 $4,117,251 $4,085,121 $2,588,161 $4,539,203 $2,85t,978 $37,435,326
Original Allocation: $5,470,847 $5,428,745 $5,735,274 $6,093,356 $6,181,151 $6,181,151
Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Page 8 of 8 Date: 10/4/01
STAFF PERSON:
WORK SESSION:
ATTACHMENT C
JUANDIEGO WADE, DAVID BENISH
OCTOBER 16,2001
WORK SESSION: SIX YEAR SECONDARY ROAD PLAN FOR 2002-2008
Introduction
The purpose of this work session is to provide:
Ini~iai overview of the Six Year Road Plan process;
General review of the existing projects on the County's
priority list of road improvements and posential projects
to be considered for inclusion in this year's revision of
the list; and
· Opportunity for Planning Commission to discuss the
County's existing prioricy list or other potential
projecss/issues.
Six Year Plan Process
The Six Year Secondary Road Construction Plan is VDOT's Plan for
the allocation of road construction funds for a six year period, it
consists of a priority list of projec5s and a financial
implementation plan. The Plan is based on local priorities adopted
by the Board of Superv!sors. The County typically reviews this
priority list of projects every year. Attach_merit A is the current
adopted VDOT Secondary Road Construction Plan. Attachment B is the
currens.adopted County Priority List for Secondary Road
Improvement. The focus of this annual review of the Six year Plan
is the County's priority list (Attackment B). The VIDOT Six Year
Road Construction Plan zs the implementation tool for this list.
Since 1986, the Commiss!on and Board of Supervisors have approved a
priority list of road improvement projects that would cost, in
total, in excess of available funds over ~he six-year planning
period. With such a list developed, subsequen~ VDOT Six Year Plans
can be prepared and revised ~n response to available annual funds.
The County has used a locally derived criteria-based rating system
5o prioritize road improvement projects in the County. This system,
winh some modifications and refinements, has been used since 1988.
Once the proposed improvement has been prioritized in its
particular category, all of the prolecns are combined for each
category to make one priority list. These categories include spot
improvements, major reconstruction, unpaved road, railroad
crossing, and bridge zmprovements.
There are no major changes in VDOT's draft 2002-2008 Secondary
System Construction Plan (Attachment C). VDOT was only able to add
three projects to the Six Year Construction Plan. These projects are
#17-810,Brown's Gap Road, #18-795, Blenheim Road, and #29-712, Coles
Crossing Road. Major changes to projects in the existing Six year
Construction Plan include Meadow Creek Parkway-Phase I advertisement
date changed from July 2, 2002 to June 1, 2004, Jarman Gap Road
advertisement date moved from August 1, 2005 to December 1, 2004,
and the cost of paving Doctors Crossing Road increased $63,105.
Projedt #12- 781 Sunset Avenue, due to the numerous unzversity
housing projects proposed in this area, the scope of this project
has changed to include urban cross section and bike lanes and
sidewalks. The cost has increased to $1,650,000.
New Priority List
There are minor changes in County's propose Priority List for
Secondary Improvements (Attachment D). In addition to the changes
noted in the section above, staff received several requests from
the public during the year for the Planning Commission an~ Board of
Supervisors to consider for inclusion on the priority list. Staff
received a recommendation from V/DOT to include Rt. 729 to the
County's Six Year Secondary Road Priority List based on the
geometrics of the road and the traffic count of 4400 AADT.
(Attachment E)
Public/VDOT Requests for consideration received include:
Name From To
Project
704 Fortune Lane Rt. 715 Dead End
680 Brown Gap Tk Rt. 240 Rt. 810
689 Pounding Cr. Rd Rt. 250 Rt. 635
614 @ 676 Garth Rd at Owensville Rd
637 Dick Woods Road
688 Midway Road
736 White Mtn Rd
605 Durrett Ridge Road
729 Buck Island Rd
Rt. 691 Rt. 692
Rt. 635 Rt. 824
Rt. 635 Dead End
Rt. 743 Swift Run Riv
Rt. 53 Rt. 1120
Paving
Spot Improvement
Paving
Inter. Improve.
Paving
Paving
Paving
Paving
Spot Improvement
Staff used the criteria-based rasing system to prioritize these
public requests. They have been added (bold and italicized) to the
draft County Six Year Secondary Priority List (Attachment D).
2
Traffic Calming:
Staff has been working with Hollymead Neighborhood Association and
VDOT to implement several traffic calming initiatzves. A copy of
these initiatives can be found on Attachment F. %rOOT's in still
reviewing this request. V/DOT's District and Local Residency Offices
are determining which of these traffic calming projects are
eligible for secondary funding.
Summary:
The focus of this annual revzew of the Six Year Plan and
work session is the County's Priority List for Secondary
Improvements priority. The VDOT Six Year Road Construction
Plan is the implementation tool for this list. Staff will
take your comments on the proposed Priority List and Six
Year Construction Plah and schedule another work session, if
necessary. The Board of Supervzsors will hold a work session
and public hearing on the Commission's recommended Priority
List and Six Year Construction Plan prior to adOption.
Attachments:
Ao
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
VDOT Adopted Six Year Construction Plan
County Adopted Six Year Priority List
VDOT Draft Six Year Construction Plan
County Proposed Six Year Priority List
Letter From V DOT Concerning Route 729
Hollymead Traffic Calming Letter to VDOT
ATTACHMENT F
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 Mclntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(434) 296 - 5823 Ext. 3368
Fax (434) 972 - 4012
July 31,2001
Bill Mills
Assistant Resident Engineer
Vir~tia Department of Transportation
711 VDOT Way
Charlottesville, VA 22911
Dear Bill:
As I discussed with you several weeks ago, the County Planning Department recently met xvith
representatives from the Hollymead Neighborhood Association to discuss safety and traffic calming
measures. The Neighborhood Association identified four major pedestrian safety issues.
They include:
1. Traffic flow (pedestrian and vehicular) at the Powell Creek / Hollymead intersection.
2. The inability of children to safely cross Hollymead Drive and Powell Creek Drive to use the existing
walkway (north side of Hollymead Drive and the east side of part of Powell Creek Drive).
3. Speed of vehicles along the road and volume of traffic at peak periods.
4. Vehicle and pedestrian conflicts schools at the entrance to the school.
The association has proposed the following improvements to address those concerns. Please review for
VDOT approval and implementation timetable.
· Raised and striped pedestrian crossings at the intersections of Hollymead Drive with Maiden Lane,
Robin Lane, Derby Lane, Redwing Lane, and Ravens Place.
· All-way stops at the following intersections:
Hollymead Drive ~ Sourwood Place
Hollymead Drive ~ Powell Creek Drive
Powell Creek Drive ~,. Peppervine Court.
The County is in favor of establishing appropriate traffic and pedestrian management devices to provide
for pedestrian and vehicle safety and, therefore, supports the Neighborhood's request for
traffic/pedestrian management improvements. As you may recall, the County identified the Hollymead
development as its priority community for VDOT's traffic calming program. These improvements are
even more critical in the near future with the connection of Powell Creek Drive and Timberwood
Parkway ~vhich is now under construction. Once this connection is made a new pattern of traffic will
emerge in a corridor which experiences a high level of pedestrian/bicycle use. Appropriate measures
also need to be considered and installed in Forest Lakes (North and South) to avoid unnecessary
2O
ATTACHMENT E
CHARLES NOTTINGHAM
COMMISSIONER
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
701 VDOT WAY
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA 22911
September 25, 2001
JAMES L. BRYAN
RES [DENT ENGINEER
_.Mr. Juan Wade
Dept. Of Planning & Community Development
401 Mclntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Route 729
Albemarle County
From Rt. 53 to Rt. 1120
Dear Mr. Wade:
'We recently completed a review of Route 729 for additional signage. All
signs including a 35 MPH limit sign are in place.
We are recommending additional enforcement of the speed limit in the short
term, however this road should be included in long range planning for
improvements due to the geometrics of the road and the traffic count of 4400
AADT.
We are copying Chief John Miller 'to advise him of this enforcement
recommendation.
Yours truly,
/'/u. w!:!ains
Asst. Resident Engineer
HWM/smh
Cc.'
Chief John Miller
TRANSPC. RTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY '- 28
Page 2
Julys31,2001
Mi'. Bill Mills
cut-through traffic and maintain vehicular speeds at a reasonable level consistent with the residential
character of the neighborhood. Therefore, the County also requests that VDOT and County staff
consider other strategic locations for all-way stops and pedestrian crossings (marked and/or raised along
Ashwood Boulevard, Powell Creek Drive and Timberwood Bouievard) in the Forest Lakes
developments.
I look forward to VDOT's response and discussing this very important issue with you in more detail at
your earliest possible Convenience. I would be happy to meet with you, perhaps on-site, to further
discuss these issues. I would like to apprise the Hollymead and Forest Lakes Associations of the
feasibility, of these requests by the end of the month. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
Juandiego Wade
Senior Transportation Planner
30
CHARLES D. NOTTINGHAM
COMMISSIONER
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219-2000
January 8, 2002
MOHAMMAD MIRSHAHI, P.E.
STATE LOCATION AND DESIGN ENGINEER
Route 631/Meadow Creek Parkway
Proj: 0631-002-128, C502, B612, B657
Fr: Melbourne Ro(ad
To: .05 Mile North of the Route 631
(Rio Road) Bridge Over the Norfolk
Southern Railway
PPMS #: 2530
File #: Loc-04-01
Albemarle County
Location Public Hearing Approval
Chairman, Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
889 Leigh Way
Charlottesville, VA 22901
The Commonwealth Transportation Board on December 18, 2001, approved the
proposed project. Attached is the resolution that was approved by the CTB for Route
631-Meadow Creek Parkway.
Sincerely,
.m.
State Location and Design Engineer
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
COMMONWEALTH o£ VIRG
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219-1939
SHIRLEY J. YBARRA
CHAIRMAN
Agenda item it 14-C
RESOLUTION
OF THE
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
December 18, 2001
MOTION
Made By: Mr. Myers Seconded By: Mr. Byrd Action: Motion carried
Title: LOCATION
Route 631/Meadow Creek Parkway
Albemarle County
WHEREAS, in accordance with the statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia and
policies of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, a Location Public Heating was held in
the Walker Middle School on June 27, 1979 for the purpose of considering the proposed
location of Mclntire Road from the intersection of Preston Avenue (in Charlottesville)
northward to Rio Road (in Albemarle County), State Projects U000-104-102, C501 and
0631-002-128, C502; and
WHEREAS, location approval and limited access designation was granted by the
State Highway and Transportation Commission on December 13, 1979; and
WHEREAS, a second Location Public Heating was held in the Charlottesville High
School on April 26, 1994 for the purpose of considering the proposed location of Mclntire
Extension/Meadow Creek Parkway from the intersection of Route 250 to Rio Road (Route
631 ), State Projects U000-104-102, C501 and 0631-002-128, C502, Federal Project M5104
(108); and
WHEREAS, on September 15, 1994 the Commonwealth Transportation Board
rescinded its December 13, 1979 approval and approved the location designated Alternative
A, in accordance with the plan as proposed and presented at the April 26, 1994 Location
Public Heating; and
WHEREAS, a Design Public Heating was held in the Charlottesville High School on
May 27, 1999 between 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m., for the purpose of considering the major
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Resolution of the Board
Location: Route 631 (Meadow Creek Parkway) Albemarle County
December 18, 2001
Page Two
design of Mclntire Road Extension/Meadow Creek Parkway from the intersection of Route
250 to Rio Road (Route 631), State Projects U000-104-102, RW201, C501 and 0631-002-
128, C502, B612, B657 in the City of Charlottesville and County of Albemarle; and
WHEREAS, on September 15, 1999, the Commonwealth Transportation Board
approved the major design features of the Mclntire Road Extension/Meadow Creek Parkway
section in accordance with the plan as proposed and presented at the May 27, 1999 Design
Public Hearing; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the design approval by the Commonwealth Transportation
Board, Albemarle County still felt its citizens were not in total agreement with the proposed
project and hired Jones and Jones, a Seattle based consultant firm, to provide a parkway
design concept based on a 35 mile per hour design speed; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia and
policies of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, a Location Public Hearing was held at
the Albemarle County Office Building located at 401 Mclntire Road in Charlottesville,
Virginia on Wednesday, September 12, 2001 at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of considering the
proposed location of Route 631 from Melbourne Road to .05 miles north of the Route 631
(Rio Road) Bridge over the Norfolk Southem Railway; State Project: 0631-002-128, C502,
B612, B657; and
WHEREAS, proper notice was given in advance, and all those present were given a
full opportunity to express their opinions and recommendations for or against the proposed
project as presented, and their statements being duly recorded.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the approval of the September 15,
1999 location and design of Route 631, State Project 0631-002-128, C502, for the section of
McIntire Road/Meadow Creek Parkway project from Melbourne Road to .05 miles north of
Route 631 (Rio Road) Bridge over the Norfolk Southern Railway be rescinded and that
Altemative "A" of the McIntire Road/Meadow Creek Parkway project be approved in
accordance with the plan as proposed and presented at the Location Public Hearing held
September 12, 200.!, by the Department's Engineers with modifications to include the four-
lane section of relocated Rio Road.
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
· Fo, rm. 3
7/25/86