Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201200016 Legacy Document 2012-08-08 (5)WILLIAMS MULLEN June 26, 2012 VIA HAND DELIVERY Christopher Perez, Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: SP 2012 -00016 University of Virginia Foundation Property / NTELOS Wireless Telecommunications Facility NTELOS Site "CV825 Cedar Hill" Critical Slopes Waiver Request Dear Mr. Perez: NTELOS is submitting this request to allow disturbance of critical slopes for the installation of the proposed Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. ( NTELOS) wireless telecommunications facility located on tax map parcel 90B- OA -11, property owned by the UVA Foundation. Overview: The facility consists of a telecommunications facility monopole structure, two (2) equipment cabinet platforms, a future 45 square foot concrete equipment slab within a 600 square foot gravel compound. The proposed site will be accessed by an existing gravel access road. The area disturbed (2,115 square feet) is 0.049% of the parent parcel, Albemarle County Tax Map 090BO- 00 -OA- 01100. The construction of the telecommunications facility will require approximately 354 square feet of disturbed area on the critical slopes, all of it in the form of grading and fill at the eastern side of the equipment compound area. The areas of critical slopes are identified on the drawings prepared by Timmons Group dated June 25, 2012 (the "Zoning Drawings "). NTELOS will address the five health, safety and welfare provisions of section 4.2, Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance below: Rapid and /or large scale movement of soil and rock Construction of the tower compound will not require substantial grading, but, rather, it will require the construction of a 5' +1- tall retaining wall to stabilize the existing man- A Professional Corporation NORTH CAROLINA • VIRGINIA • WASHINGTON, D.C. • LONDON 321 East Main St., Suite 400 Charlottesville, VA 22902 -3200 Tel: 434.951.5700 Fax: 804.783.6507 or 434.817.0977 www.williamsmullen.com WILLIAMS MULLEN Christopher Perez June 26, 2012 Page 2 made slope created when the existing access road was constructed some time ago. There will be no additional excavating of the slope required between the proposed tower site and the Reference Tree, however there will be some fill material placed behind the retaining wall in order to minimize the slope and reduce the possibility of slope failure during a storm event. No blasting or rock removal is proposed or foreseen. The site will be geologically stabilized with erosion control measures as outlined in the Zoning Drawings. These measures include: 1. Silt fence to confine soil and rock within the telecommunications facility and access road areas; and 2. Soil stabilization blankets and matting at the existing steep slopes. Permanent stabilization of the disturbed areas will be achieved through fine grading, graveling, and installation of ground cover /vegetation. Excessive stormwater run -off Overall, the proposed telecommunications facility is calculated to minimally increase the site's soil permeability and stormwater runoff. The finished surface of the telecommunications facility's site will be pervious, consisting of a layer of gravel over a meshed layer of geo- synthetic fibers that will filter stormwater back into the soil instead of allowing it to flow off -site. Any excess stormwater runoff will be transported as sheet flow through the highly permeable soils of the existing wooded downslope area and will be quickly absorbed. Siltation of natural and man -made bodies of water No existing bodies of water have been identified on the subject parcel. The proposed telecommunications facility comprises a minute portion of the property, which is a substantially undeveloped and stabilized wooded parcel. The proposed soil compaction, geo - synthetic fiber layer and gravelling will stabilize the soil at the access road and lease area. This structural stabilization — combined with the extensive, existing vegetation to remain down slope from the facility — will ensure that silt will not enter nearby water bodies on adjacent properties. WILLIAMS MULLEN Christopher Perez June 26, 2012 Page 3 Loss of aesthetic resource Due to the scale of the Open Space Plan maps, it is difficult to determine whether the critical slopes that would be disturbed for the installation of the proposed telecommunications facility are shown on the maps of the Open Space Plan. The existing aesthetic resources of the subject parcel reside chiefly in the characteristics of the existing wooded slope. There will be no significant loss to these resources. The majority of the existing wooded vegetation will remain with only minimal trees to be removed for this facility (only one of the trees that will be removed is greater than 4 inches in diameter). The existing trees to remain will receive tree protection during and after construction. The existing tree canopy uphill from the site will provide adequate backdrop for the tower for views from the West and cover for views from the North and South. This telecommunications facility is located within a small previously man -made clearing within the wooded parcel. The existing access road on the property will provide ingress and egress to the proposed tower site, therefore no additional tree removal, clearing or grading will be necessary to access the tower facility. Greater travel distance of septic effluent The proposed telecommunications facility will be unmanned, with no septic or plumbing systems. The concerns of this section are not applicable to this request. Interpretation of Section 4.2.5(b) Section 4.2.5(b) allows the Planning Commission to waive the restrictions on disturbing slopes upon finding the following (in part): 1. A strict application of these provisions would not forward the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance or otherwise serve the public health, safety or welfare. The telecommunications facility is located in a wooded area on the side of a steep hill in order to reduce visibility by using the back drop of trees, but also to remain effective. Its location in this area requires fewer disturbances to the land and makes the tower less visible from the surrounding area. The proposed facility will comply with the requirements for mitigating visibility for treetop wireless telecommunications facilities. This particular site was located within the parent parcel to provide access from an existing access road while maintaining setbacks from adjacent properties. The subject parcel is located on the side of a ridgeline and thus, WILLIAMS MULLEN Christopher Perez June 26, 2012 Page 4 there are large areas of steep slopes. The entire subject parcel is comprised of critical slopes, therefore by locating the proposed tower facility at the end of the existing access road and using the existing ingress and egress, the proposed site will disturb an extremely small area of the subject property's natural area. The benefits of utilizing this particular area of the parcel, from a visibility perspective, and in terms of minimizing the size of the disturbed area, far outweigh the extremely small area of critical slopes that are disturbed. Therefore, strict applications of Section 4.2 would not forward the purposes of the Albemarle County Code or the Personal Wireless Services Facility Policy, or otherwise serve the public health, safety or welfare. 2. Alternatives proposed by the applicant would satisfy the intent and purpose of section 4.2 to at least an equivalent degree. As discussed previously in this letter, the applicant is proposing engineering measures as part of the proposal that will avoid the adverse impacts that are often associated with the disturbance of critical slopes. Given the extremely small size of the proposed area of disturbance (particularly in light of the fact that the entire parcel is comprised of critical slopes), the use of these engineering measures will satisfy the intent and purpose of section 4.2 at least to an equivalent degree. 3. Due to its unusual size, topography, shape of the property, location of the property or other unusual conditions, excluding the proprietary interest of the developer, the requirements of section 4.2 would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property or would result in significant degradation of the site or adjacent properties. The subject parcel is located entirely on the side of a steep ridgeline and thus the entire parcel is comprised of critical slopes. As a result, the telecommunications facility was located on the parcel within trees to minimize its visibility, off of an existing access road to reduce the need to clear vegetation or trees for access, but the facility remains on the side of a steep slope. Thus, due to the subject parcel's unusual topography the application of the strict requirements of Section 4.2 would unreasonably restrict the installation of a telecommunications facility on this subject parcel. The proposed retaining wall will further mitigate the current man -made disturbance by adding back -fill to an area that is already unstable. The siting of the telecommunications facility was specifically chosen to provide a backdrop of trees and therefore reduce the visibility of the monopole from the surrounding area. WILLIAMS MULLEN Christopher Perez June 26, 2012 Page 5 4. Granting such modification or waiver would serve a public purpose of greater import than would be served by strict application of section 4.2. Wireless telecommunications facilities are an important utility for the public to provide reliable mobile phone coverage for emergency purposes as well as an important utility for emergency personnel who commonly locate their own equipment on the monopoles. In this particular instance, the siting of this monopole on the side of a steep hill will provide the backdrop of trees from all vantage points, which mitigates any potential visual impacts resulting from the facility. Thus, it will enable the public to benefit from the wireless telecommunications services without the facility having an adverse visual impact. This will further the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, particularly the Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Plan. Conclusion: Many of the concerns associated with the disturbance of critical slopes and the criteria for evaluating a critical slopes waiver are considered and addressed generally through the existing Personal Wireless Service Facilities Ordinance requirements, such as the requirements for tree conservation plans, finished grades, and sound construction techniques. The proposed telecommunications facility is located in a small compound area using an existing access road, and, because of the careful siting of the proposed facility, has a backdrop of trees to reduce visibility. For the reasons stated herein, we contend that the application satisfies all four of the findings in Section 4.2.5.a.3, even though only one finding is actually required for purposes of approving the waiver request. Please contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Regards, V("(J" - Valerie W. Long cc: Jessie Wilmer, NTELOS Brian Crutchfield, Timmons Group 18489724_4 DOC