Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201200027 Staff Report 2012-11-08o� ark, ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY Project Name: SP201200027 Verizon Wireless — Old Staff: Claudette Grant, Senior Planner Lynchburg, Tier III Planning Commission Public Hearing: Board of Supervisors Hearing: November 13, 2012 December 5, 2012 Owners: Woodlands of Charlottesville, LLC Applicant: Alltel Communications of Virginia, Inc. D /B /A Verizon Wireless -c /o Julian Pedini Acreage: Approximately 0.068787 Rezone from: Not applicable Special Use Permit for: Section 18.2.2.18 Special Use Permit, which allows for Tier III personal wireless service facilities in the R -15 Zoning District. TMP: 07600- 00- 00 -046CO By -right use: R -15, residential Location: 925 Sunset Avenue, Ext. (Attachment A) Magisterial District: Scottsville Proffers /Conditions: No Requested # of Dwelling Units /Lots: N/A DA -X RA - Proposal: Request for modification of the existing Tier I Comp. Plan Designation: Urban Density installation to a Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Residential in Neighborhood 5 to include installation of 6 additional panel antennas (for a total of 9) and the extension of the mount /towers from 112 feet to 122 feet. (Attachment B) Character of Property: This property is zoned R -15 and Use of Surrounding Properties: There are located in the Entrance Corridor. The property is adjacent several apartment complexes and residential to the Woodlands and Jefferson Ridge apartments. The developments in the vicinity of this property. property is vacant and primarily wooded with large utility Redfields, the Villas at Southern Ridge Condos poles on it. Interstate -64 is located adjacent and to the and Eagles Landing are examples of some of the north of the site. residential uses located nearby. Interstate- 64 is also adjacent to this property. Factors Favorable: Factors Unfavorable: 1. The ARB finds that the proposed location of the 1. The Personal Wireless Service Facilities facility will minimize visibility such that no Policy looks unfavorably on mitigating significant negative impact on the Entrance visual impact by creating more visual Corridor will be created. impact. 2. Due to the height and scale of the existing 2. The height of the pole relative to the structure, the size difference from the additional surrounding trees increases its visibility, height and antenna array size will not have a primarily on site and from the adjacent significant impact to the structure on its visibility. property. 3. This facility will provide advanced technology service and high speed 4G services that are more advanced than those currently available in this marked, therefore contributing to the general health, safety, and welfare of the public. 4. No objection has been received from the adjacent property owners, which is where the structure is visible. Zoning Ordinance Waivers and Recommendations: Modifications for Sections 5.1.40(c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), (d)(5), (d)(6) and (d)(7) are included. Based on findings presented in the staff report, staff recommends approval of SP201200027 and all modifications special exception requests with a condition. STAFF CONTACT: Claudette Grant, Senior Planner PLANNING COMMISSION: November 13, 2012 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: December 5, 2012 AGENDA TITLE: SP201200027 Verizon Wireless — Old Lynchburg, Tier III PROPERTY OWNER: Woodlands of Charlottesville, LLC APPLICANT: Alltel Communications of Virginia, Inc. D /B /A Verizon Wireless -c /o Julian Pedini PROPOSAL: This is a request for modification of the existing Tier I installation to a Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility to include installation of 6 additional panel antennas (for a total of 9) and the extension of the mount /towers from 112 feet to 122 feet. Virginia Dominion Power has changed their policy to no longer allow antennas to be mounted below any of the lines on their high tension transmission towers. Verizon's existing facility includes 3 panel antennas flush- mounted to the Dominion pole below the static line located at the top of the tower and at a centerline height of 105' above ground level ( "AGL "), adjust above the level of 12 electrical coax lines. As a result the pole must be retrofit with an extension mount that will allow both the existing and proposed antennas to be mounted above the static line. The new overall height of the facility will be 122.2' AGL. This application does not include any proposed changes on ground. The site is accessed by an existing gravel access road off of Sunset Avenue, Ext. and will remain unchanged. The 11.159 acres for the subject parcel is described as Tax Map 76, Parcel 46C and is located in the Scottsville District. It is zoned Residential ( "R -15 "). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the property located in Urban Neighborhood 5 -for Urban Density Residential uses. CHARACTER OF THE AREA: This property is zoned R -15 and located in the Entrance Corridor. The property is vacant and wooded and contains large utility poles. It is surrounded by a variety of residential uses, such as the Woodlands, Jefferson Ridge Apartments, Redfield subdivision, and Eagles Landing. PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY: SP1998 -00062 SP for antennas on existing electrical transmission tower SP1974 -00380 SP for condominiums SDP2007 -00051 Minor amendment for the Woodlands of Charlottesville SDP2007 -00034 Old Lynchburg Road Tier II Tower SDP200600051 Final site plan for the Woodlands of Charlottesville SDP2005 -00123 Preliminary site plan for the Woodlands DISCUSSION: This is a proposal to request the modification of the existing Tier I installation to a Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility to include installation of 6 additional panel antennas (for a total of 9) and the extension of the mount /towers from 112 feet to 122 feet. The site is located in the Entrance Corridor for Interstate -64, it has an entrance corridor overlay and was evaluated by the ARB staff. As part of the application, several waivers are proposed that are outlined below. ANALYSIS OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST: Section 31.6.1 of the Zoning Ordinance below requires that special use permits be reviewed as follows: Will the use be of substantial detriment to adjacent property? The existing tower is proposed to be 122.2 + /- feet (637.2' + /- AMSL) and there are few trees within 25 feet of the structure. The Applicant has requested a waiver of the reference tree requirement as the tower is significantly taller than the surrounding trees, which increases its visibility. (Attachments B & C) The existing tower will increase in height by 10 feet. Since the tower already exists in this location and there are no changes proposed to the ground area around the tower, it is not anticipated that the proposed modification will be detrimental to the adjacent properties. Adjacent property owners have expressed no objection to the tower modifications. Will the character of the zoning district change with this use? Although the height of the existing tower relative to the surrounding tree canopy is somewhat taller, its visibility is limited within the vicinity. At other locations, the topography and tree coverage mitigate the visibility of the existing structure and the proposed increase in height. The ARB staff has reviewed this request for modification and has determined that the additional 10' height and the antennas mounted on the platform at the top of the existing tower are not expected to significantly increase the visibility of the facility or its impact on the Entrance Corridor. It is not anticipated that this existing tower with proposed modifications will change the character of the residential zoning district. Will the use be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance? Staff has reviewed this request as it relates to the "purpose and intent" that is set forth in Sections 1.4 and 1.4.7 of the Zoning Ordinance, and as it relates to the intent specified in the Residential, R -15 chapter of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 18.1). This request is consistent with both sections. Will the use be in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district? This use has existed in its' current location for several years and the County is not aware of any issues or concerns with the existing tower. The special use permit request is to modify the existing tower in order to enhance the services it provides and adhere to new Virginia Dominion Power policies regarding antenna mounting. This cell tower use is in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district because it has existed in its current location for several years. Also the tower is not highly visible unless you are in its immediate vicinity. The proposed modification to the personal wireless service facility will not restrict any nearby by -right uses within the Residential district. M Will the public health, safety and general welfare of the community be protected if the use is approved? The public health, safety, and general welfare of the community is protected through the special use permit process, which assures that uses approved by special use permit are appropriate in the location requested. The proposed modification to the existing tower will provide an enhanced service and more reliable access to the wireless communication market, to include schools, residences and those using Interstate -64. This can be seen as contributing to the public health, safety and welfare. Otherwise, no change to the public health, safety and general welfare is expected with this approval. Compliance with Section 5.1.40 of the Zoning Ordinance The county's specific design criteria for Tier III facilities as set forth in section 5.1.40(e) are addressed as follows [Ordinance sections are in bold italics]: Section 5.1.40(e) Tier 111 facilities. Each Tier III facility may be established upon approval of a special use permit issued pursuant to section 31.6.1 of this chapter, initiated upon an application satisfying the requirements of subsection 5.1.40(a) and section 31.6.2, and it shall be installed and operated in compliance with all applicable provisions of this chapter and the following: 1. The facility shall comply with subsection 5.1.40(b) subsection 5.1.40(c)(2) through (9) and subsection 5.1.40(d)(2),(3),(6) and (7), unless modified by the board of supervisors during special use permit review. 2. The facility shall comply with all conditions of approval of the special use permit. Requirements of subsection 5.1.40(a) application for approval and section 31.6.1 special use permits have been met, with the exception of the modifications detailed below. Due to safety reasons and status as an existing tower no balloon test was performed for this location. The applicant has submitted photo simulations of the proposed modifications. (Attachment C) Compliance with Section 5.1.40(e) of the Zoning Ordinance: The County's specific design criteria for Tier III facilities set forth in Section 5.1.40(e)(1) and 5.1.40(e)(2) are addressed as follows: Subsection 5.1.40(b)(1 -5): Exemption from regulations otherwise applicable: Except as otherwise exempted in this paragraph, each facility shall be subject to all applicable regulations in this chapter. The proposed wireless facility meets the required Commercial Office setbacks in addition to all other area and bulk regulations and minimum yard requirements. Attached site drawings, antennae and equipment specifications have been provided to demonstrate that personal wireless service facilities (PWSF) regulations and any relevant site plan requirements set forth in Section 32 of the zoning ordinance have been addressed. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(2) -: The facility shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows: (i) guy wires shall not be permitted, (ii) outdoor lighting for the facility shall be permitted only during maintenance periods; regardless of the lumens emitted, each outdoor luminaire shall be fully shielded as required by section 4.17 of this chapter; (iii) any equipment cabinet not located within the existing structure shall be screened from all lot lines either by terrain, existing E structures, existing vegetation, or by added vegetation approved by the county's landscape planner; (iv) a whip antenna less than six (6) inches in diameter may exceed the height of the existing structure; (v) a grounding rod, whose height shall not exceed two (2) feet and whose width shall not exceed one (1) inch in diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of facility or the structure; and (vi) within one month after the completion of the installation of the facility, the applicant shall provide a statement to the agent certifying that the height of all components of the facility complies with this regulation. The proposed modification to the tower will not require the installation of guy wires, no additional lighting, no additional equipment cabinets, nor will it be fitted with any whip antennas. Any ground rod required by Dominion or Verizon Wireless will comply with this provision. All other requirements of this subsection have been met. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(3): Equipment shall be attached to the exterior of a structure only as follows: (i) the total number of arrays of antennas attached to the existing structure shall not exceed three (3), and each antenna proposed to be attached under the pending application shall not exceed the size shown on the application, which size shall not exceed one thousand one hundred fifty two (1152) square inches; (ii) no antenna shall project from the structure beyond the minimum required by the mounting equipment, and in no case shall any point on the face of an antenna project more than twelve (12) inches from the existing structure; and (iii) each antenna and associated equipment shall be a color that matches the existing structure. For purposes of this section, all types of antennas and dishes regardless of their use shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays. The only existing antenna array at this site will be replaced by the proposed, one larger array containing all nine antennae. This results in a larger (14 foot wide) array /platform, but minimizes the extension /height of tower needed to provide the antenna. The larger platform will improve the technology and service provided by the tower. The Antel BXD- 63606380CF antenna size is 1194.48 square inches, slightly larger than the 1152 s.i. size limit mentioned in this section, and Verizon Wireless hereby requests that the Board of Supervisors modify or waive this requirement; the other antennas, Antel BXA- 70063-8CF-2 and Antel BXA- 171063 -16CF antennas comply with the size limit; (ii) Verizon Wireless proposes a horizontal array mounted on a 14' wide platform at this site in order to reduce the overall height necessary for the pole extension and thereby reduce the visual impact of the project, and Verizon Wireless hereby requests that the Board of Supervisors modify or waive this requirement; (iii) the proposed antennas and pole extension will match the existing pole. Staff can support these waivers, since the antennas and pole extension will match the existing pole. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(4): Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a tree conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist. The plan shall be submitted to the agent for review and approval to assure that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The plan shall specify tree protection methods and procedures, and identify all existing trees to be removed on the parcel for the installation, operation and maintenance of the facility. Except for the tree removal expressly authorized by the agent, the applicant shall not remove existing trees within the lease area or within one hundred (100) feet in all directions surrounding the lease area of any part of the facility. In addition, the agent may identify additional trees or lands up to two hundred (200) feet from the lease area to be included in the plan. I No ground work is proposed by the applicant; therefore the applicant is requesting the Board of Supervisors modify or waive this requirement. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(5) The installation, operation and maintenance of the facility shall be conducted in accordance with the tree conservation plan. Dead and dying trees identified by the arborist's report may be removed if so noted on the tree conservation plan. If tree removal is later requested that was not approved by the agent when the tree conservation plan was approved, the applicant shall submit an amended plan. The agent may approve the amended plan if the proposed tree removal will not adversely affect the visibility of the facility from any location off of the parcel. The agent may impose reasonable conditions to assure that the purposes of this paragraph are achieved. As stated above, with no ground work proposed by the applicant, the applicant requests the Board of Supervisors waive this requirement. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(6): The facility shall be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the date its use for personal wireless service purposes is discontinued. If the agent determines at any time that surety is required to guarantee that the facility will be removed as required, the agent may require that the parcel owner or the owner of the facility submit a certified check, a bond with surety, or a letter of credit, in an amount sufficient for, and conditioned upon, the removal of the facility. The type and form of the surety guarantee shall be to the satisfaction of the agent and the county attorney. In determining whether surety should be required, the agent shall consider the following: (i) the annual report states that the tower or pole is no longer being used for personal wireless service facilities; (ii) the annual report was not filed, (iii) there is a change in technology that makes it likely that tower or pole will be unnecessary in the near future; (iv) the permittee fails to comply with applicable regulations or conditions; (v) the permittee fails to timely remove another tower or pole within the county, and (vi) whenever otherwise deemed necessary by the agent. Should the use of this facility in this location become discontinued at anytime in the future, Verizon Wireless and /or its assignee(s) will be required to remove the facility within 90 days. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(7): The owner of the facility shall submit a report to the agent by no earlier than May or and no later than July 1 of each year. The report shall identify each user of the existing structure, and include a drawing, photograph or other illustration identifying which equipment is owned and /or operated by each personal wireless service provider. Multiple users on a single tower or other mounting structure may submit a single report, provided that the report includes a statement signed by a representative from each user acquiescing in the report. It is recommended that Verizon Wireless submit an annual report updating the user annually to satisfy the requirements under the Ordinance. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(8): No slopes associated with the installation of the facility and accessory uses shall be created that are steeper than 2 :1 unless retaining 7 walls, revetments, or other stabilization measures acceptable to the county engineer are employed. No ground work is proposed. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(9): Any equipment cabinet not located within an existing building shall be fenced only with the approval of the agent upon finding that the fence: (i) would protect the facility from trespass in areas of high volumes of vehicular or pedestrian traffic or, in the rural areas, to protect the facility from livestock or wildlife; (ii) would not be detrimental to the character of the area; and (iii) would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. The Applicant is not proposing fencing at this time. Section 5.1.40(d)(2): The site shall provide adequate opportunities for screening and the facility shall be sited to minimize its visibility from adjacent parcels and streets, regardless of their distance from the facility. If the facility would be visible from a state scenic river or a national park or national forest, regardless of whether the site is adjacent thereto, the facility also shall be sited to minimize its visibility from such river, park or forest. If the facility would be located on lands subject to a conservation easement or an open space easement, or adjacent to a conservation easement or open space easement, the facility shall be sited so that it is not visible from any resources specifically identified for protection in the deed of easement. The existing facility is not visible when traveling westbound on the 1 -64. However, the existing facility is visible from the eastbound lanes for a very brief period in the immediate vicinity of Sunset Avenue Extended. The proposed additional 10' height and the antennas mounted on the platform at the top of the existing tower are not expected to significantly increase the visibility of the facility or its impact on the Entrance Corridor. Section 5.1.40(d)(3): The facility shall not adversely impact resources identified in the county's open space plan. The Personal Wireless Service Facility Policy encourages facilities that have limited visual impact. This proposed site is in the Entrance Corridor, but will only be visible from a limited location and therefore does not adversely impact any resources in the open space plan. Section 5.1.40(d)(4): The facility shall not be located so that it and three (3) or more existing or approved personal wireless service facilities would be within an area comprised of a circle centered anywhere on the ground having a radius of two hundred (200) feet. There are no other PWSF within 200 feet of this tower. Section 5.1.40(d)(5): The maximum base diameter of the monopole shall be thirty (30) inches and the maximum diameter of the top of the monopole shall be eighteen (18) inches. Since this tower is constructed for supporting high tension power lines, it does not meet the diameter requirements and a waiver is needed. 8 Section 5.1.40(d)(6): The top of the monopole, measured in elevation above mean sea level, shall not exceed the height approved by the commission. The approved height shall not be more than seven (7) feet taller than the tallest tree within twenty -five (25) feet of the monopole, and shall include any base, foundation or grading that raises the pole above the pre- existing natural ground elevation; provided that the height approved by the commission may be up to ten (10) feet taller than the tallest tree if the owner of the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commission that there is not a material difference in the visibility of the monopole at the proposed height, rather than at a height seven (7) feet taller than the tallest tree; and there is not a material difference in adverse impacts to resources identified in the county's open space plan caused by the monopole at the proposed height, rather than at a height seven (7) feet taller than the tallest tree. The applicant may appeal the commissioner's denial of a modification to the board of supervisors as provided in subsection 5.1.40(d)(12). Virginia Dominion Power, the owner of the pole, requires that the antennas be mounted above the static line. Verizon Wireless has proposed a mounting design that minimizes the height needed for the pole extension, and requests a waiver from the Board of Supervisors for the reference tree requirements for this subsection. Staff supports the waiver in this instance, since it is not visible from most locations due to topography and tree coverage and no objections from the public have been received. Section 5.1.40(d)(7): Each wood monopole shall be a dark brown natural wood color, each metal or concrete monopole shall be painted a brown wood color to blend into the surrounding trees. The antennas, supporting brackets, and all other equipment attached to the monopole shall be a color that closely matches that of the monopole. The ground equipment, the ground equipment cabinet, and the concrete pad shall also be a color that closely matches that of the monopole, provided that the ground equipment and the concrete pad need not be of such a color if they are enclosed within or behind an approved structure, fagade or fencing that: (i) is a color that closely matches that of the monopole; (ii) is consistent with the character of the area; and (iii) makes the ground equipment and concrete pad invisible at any time of year from any other parcel or a public or private street. The existing Dominion pole has a gray galvanized metal finish. The proposed extension will match the existing pole. The intent of this subsection is to ensure that the structure blends in with the wooded area. The pole is an existing one and because of its limited visibility beyond the site and for some of the adjacent property, the proposed modification to the structure creates limited negative visual impact to surrounding areas. Staff supports the waiver in this instance, since the color will remain the same as it currently is for the original pole and the new extension of the pole. Section 5.1.40(e)2: The facility shall comply with all conditions of approval of the special use permit. The facility complies with all conditions of approval of the special use permit (Section 31.6.3). 9 Section 704(a) (7) (b) (1) (11) of The Telecommunications Act of 1996: This application is subject to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which provides in part that the regulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities by any State or local government or instrumentality thereof (1) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; (ll) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. 47 U.S. C. In order to operate this facility, the applicant is required to comply with the FCC guidelines for radio frequency emissions that are intended to protect the public health and safety. Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the provision of personal wireless services. However, both do implement specific policies and regulations for the sighting and design of wireless facilities. The applicant has not provided any additional information regarding the availability, or absence of alternative sites that could serve the same areas that would be covered with the proposed structure at this site. Therefore, staff does not believe that the special use permitting process nor the denial of this application would have the effect of prohibiting or restricting the provision of personal wireless services. SUMMARY: Staff has identified factors which are favorable and unfavorable to this proposal: Factors favorable to this request include: The ARB finds that the proposed location of the facility will minimize visibility such that no significant negative impact on the Entrance Corridor will be created. 2. Due to the height and scale of the existing structure, the size difference from the additional height and antenna array size will not have a significant impact to the structure on its visibility. 3. This facility will provide advanced technology service and high speed 4G services that are more advanced than those currently available in this marked, therefore contributing to the general health, safety, and welfare of the public. 4. No objection has been received from the adjacent property owners, which is where the structure is visible. Factors unfavorable to this request include: The Personal Wireless Service Facilities Policy looks unfavorably on mitigating visual impact by creating more visual impact. 2. The height of the pole relative to the surrounding trees increases its visibility, primarily on site and from the adjacent property. Staff finds the tower location acceptable because it is an existing tower with limited visibility. The Personal Wireless Facilities Policy states that the most important rule in 10 mitigating visual impacts of a facility is to avoid creating more visual impact through an attempted mitigation. This proposal actually makes the pole taller by 10 feet, which makes the pole a bit more visible. Since this particular tower site has limited visibility and the adjacent property owners have no objection to the modification, Staff can support this particular proposal. In order to comply with Section 5.1.40(d) of the Zoning Ordinance if recommended for denial, the Planning Commission is required to provide the applicant with a statement regarding the basis for denial and all items that will have to be addressed to satisfy each requirement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Tier III personal wireless services facility based upon the analysis provided herein. Special Exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance: Requests for modifications must be reviewed under the criteria established in Section 31.8 taking into consideration the factors, standards, criteria and findings for each request; however no specific finding is required in support of a decision. The proposed modifications are for certain required information to be provided on supporting plan documents. The application request is to allow the modification of the existing Tier I installation to a Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility ( "PWSF ") that will include (9) panel antennas affixed to a new 14' wide platform mounted on a 10' extension of the existing 112.2' high transmission tower to improve Verizon Wireless existing network of facilities by adding fourth generation ( "4G ") services to the existing cellular services. The recommended modifications are for requirements of the ordinance that are generally meant to aid in the determination of whether a new tower is appropriate in the proposed area of the County or whether a height increase is appropriate. Staff is able to support all of the recommended modifications described in the staff report due to the existing nature of the cell tower and limited visibility. Listed below are the recommended modifications: 1. Section 5.1.40(c)(3) -no antenna to project more than 12 inches from a structure. 2. Section 5.1.40(c)(4) -tree conservation plan to be submitted prior to building permit. 3. Section 5.1.40(c)(5)- installation, operation and maintenance, to be in accordance with tree conservation plan. 4. Section 5.1.40(d)(5)- Maximum size of base and diameter of tower. 5. Section 5.1.40(d)(6)- height of the structure in relation to the reference tree. 6. Section 5.1.40(d)(7) -color of pole with all attached equipment. RECOMMENDATION ON SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR TIER III WIRELESS FACILITY: Staff recommends approval of the following special exceptions of this personal wireless service facility: 1. Section 5.1.40(c)(3) -no antenna to project more than 12 inches from a structure. 2. Section 5.1.40(c)(4) -tree conservation plan to be submitted prior to building permit. 3. Section 5.1.40(c)(5)- installation, operation and maintenance, to be in accordance with tree conservation plan. 4. Section 5.1.40(d)(5)- Maximum size of base and diameter of tower. 5. Section 5.1.40(d)(6)- height of the structure in relation to the reference tree. 6. Section 5.1.40(d)(7) -color of pole with all attached equipment. 11 If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this application, Staff recommends the following conditions: Conditions of approval: Development and use shall be in general accord with what is described in the applicant's request and site plans, entitled "Old Lynchburg Road LTE (4G) Upgrade," with a final submittal date of 9/10/12 (hereafter "Enlarged Site Plan "), as determined by the Director of Planning and Zoning Administrator. To be in accord with the Enlarged Site Plan, development and use shall reflect the following major elements within the development essential to the design of the development, as shown on the Enlarged Site Plan: a. Height b. Mounting height c. Antenna type d. Number of antenna e. Color f. Location of ground equipment Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: A. Vicinity B. Site Plan C. Applicant Photo Simulations Motion One: The Planning Commission's role in this case (SP201100027) is to make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. A. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of this Tier III personal wireless service facility: I move to recommend approval of SP 201200027 Verizon Wireless - Old Lynchburg Road, Tier III with the conditions outlined in the staff report. B. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend denial of this Tier III personal wireless service facilitv: I move to recommend denial of SP 201200027 Verizon Wireless — Old Lynchburg Road, Tier III (Planning Commission needs to give a reason for denial). Motion Two: The Planning Commission's role in this case (SP201200027) is to make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors to approve or deny modifications for Sections 5.1.40(c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), (d)(5), (d)(6) and (d)(7) under the special exception criteria of Section 31.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. 12 A. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of the modifications of Sections 5.1.40(c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), (d)(5), (d)(6) and (d)(7). I move to recommend approval granting the modifications for reasons outlined in the staff report. B. Should the Plannina Commission choose to recommend denial of the modifications for this Tier III personal wireless service facility: I move to recommend denial of the modifications outlined in the staff report. (Planning Commission needs to give a reason for denial) 13 n x z \A, F� l l z f H �A l 1 x r� z H. \PJ \3036 \11 \CAD \Sheets \C \0 -t.dwg Mon, '.0 Sep 2012 - 136pm —l—b, �c�vcp�� Z xmnn wS no rz f �rC -< Rx tlj dal C =Dpm� �A CSnm-z ♦ 1 m Z ZO Z m X G1 m Z ti N m m m i O� X Z - <zm A,�E 0 z Dzmm O W m WE Cam c: Ln OZ G�m�� mz U O <m� m A ➢ r z 0 0 n 4_� �c�vcp�� Z xmnn wS no rz f �rC -< Rx °zz° a C =Dpm� Z CSnm-z ♦ 1 m Z ZO Z m X G1 m Z ti N m m m i O� X Z - <zm AO z Dzmm O W m WE Cam c: Ln OZ G�m�� mz U a <m� A ➢ r °° m oV m rr o rn mo c F m . Z m C n A A W A A + O m [nG S,ON Z z m OO Z D m D 01 W n N f 7 O W N O S °o Fim mcnm Oa Oz o �� ° °W o -F D O Nm t m �I `y n ' �c�vcp�� Z xmnn wS no rz f �rC -< Rx °zz° a C =Dpm� Z CSnm-z ♦ 1 m Z ZO Z m X G1 m Z ti N m m m i O� X Z - <zm AO z Dzmm O W m WE Cam c: Ln OZ G�m�� mz n NAN <m� A ➢ r °° m oV m rr o rn mo c F m . Z m C n A A W A A + O m [nG S,ON Z z m OO Z D m D 01 W n N f 7 m�°D�QQQrn�g °z F,Z=w- v no rz f y Rx °zz° a eoac�'n� w�Z > n.o O m 0p C r -Z ♦ 1 �o z Z - rD-z -m Ohs Q = t� W m ['h�;8Ema OO m.Zm1� m�A1x'+ Cam c: Ln OZ G�m�� mz n NAN <m� A ➢ r °° m rr rn mo c F m . Z m C n [nG S,ON Z z m OO lxn OD O xv C D O � N f 7 O W N O S °o Fim mcnm Oa Oz o �� ° °W o -F D 0 N Fez w — m z no rz f y Rx m N � > n.o O m 0p C r O ♦ 1 << Z - N Q = t� m c: Ln OZ G�m�� �� ° z A z N /x O D M N O rn v � � O N Z A ti O i z Z f f N N N o m rn O m N O Z co m g g g C�'�1iTpq f y 8� N � > n.o O m 0p C r ♦ 1 << Z - N Q = t� c: Ln OZ G�m�� �� ° A A ➢ r g g g J m m�poz m o — 8 W N 0- w x v O m y m O O ZS= O °t7o OO Z ? 4Z7 O ref p • N � x .I O Z � Z ti N j D ~ m 4 O O X D =4 o O � A D m � A < y m = A ,0v z yv� ° �Z° n �m z ° c z z > z I � J 0 Spell the[ted by WRRCDONOO ,n 02/t7/2011 5'31pm C 1 r14 z x z S 0 m ° �m m m m Z z .z-,, ° � o rni z B � v '^ D-1 m 2 0 Q 0 0 Ln r ^ O V , 0 D Z z m� Z m Z,-, 1 � 1 n D D V 1 2 D r � D V) m m M -u C m m � r- >PC m > m < m m m Cz N Iu W C�'�1iTpq y 8� N � > n.o O m 0p C r ♦ 1 << Z - N Q = t� c: Ln OZ G�m�� �� ° 0. Za N m-1 M n 4 _ �_ m rr 0 - c F m . Z m C J m m�poz m o — 8 W N 0- w x v O m y m O O ZS= O °t7o OO Z ? 4Z7 O ref p • N � x .I O Z � Z ti N j D ~ m 4 O O X D =4 o O � A D m � A < y m = A ,0v z yv� ° �Z° n �m z ° c z z > z I � J 0 Spell the[ted by WRRCDONOO ,n 02/t7/2011 5'31pm C 1 r14 z x z S 0 m ° �m m m m Z z .z-,, ° � o rni z B � v '^ D-1 m 2 0 Q 0 0 Ln r ^ O V , 0 D Z z m� Z m Z,-, 1 � 1 n D D V 1 2 D r � D V) m m M -u C m m � r- >PC m > m < m m m Cz N Iu W C�'�1iTpq y N � z ♦ 1 << << Z - N Q = t� N CD � tn 0. Za N m-1 M n 4 _ �_ 0 W O z L.0 LY V / a w N W ^ p AS S � 3 s N w� a� o J (n m Z � w 0 z o 0 U � L� w c) > � N Q Z Q W_ p Q Q Q O 3Z� 3 O � p m O w �Wm � N O j O U N p z °m i o� w Z � N •3 0 o �z 0 r� as W 3 O N W� � N ? X W N Lil o w O 3 L,J cn Q O N Z W J Q w >x o � •L• r � ry �il N N U p sS W� W �- N �1 L� WWW J j z¢�a ¢ M �•� - Z C\ ry I Z � I � �f No yrj C, W LLJ � •L• r � ry �il N N U p sS W� W �- N �1 L� WWW J j z¢�a ¢ M �•� - ° / I Z � I � I No yrj C, W LLJ J � _z s Ln r LU r 4 1 r \•0;�b � a O ? O = a o d m a o a o Lli O II II U I U as z I •� I I I I C �`j �z $gym k �s ti/ 4• \ Si ti0 1 b 45 I / I / I � I H ry �o ca am ti! h K 1 w'alii uGZ,4l he 00.N jaNMY k m.. Ipas ,awnless u,d CS :I - ZIQZ DaS OI -u bp I / I I � I J � 1 \•0;�b I W G p �z CD I 1� 5 I lk ID h I - _ _i'fS10N �s !6 ,41 q >f,�ON — .ZO_ _ _•yR SS I 3tS,tZ.OiN 1AV'73�1tJ�����s �� 9SNns OF:B! t[N _ _ it L2! 9 —!N 2 h w'alii uGZ,4l he 00.N jaNMY k m.. Ipas ,awnless u,d CS :I - ZIQZ DaS OI -u bp I y �3 n z y �� N 1W VI C/') w O z J QN W z w O O Q Z -Z ?.' v m = �,, w D v = Q QJM0 � N x N N CL a. _ t a � C!J Q N uQ - � L] °w w w g g 3 3 wg Z 2 O O `r pp L/I N VJO a, u� Z 2 w W - O w Z m m ow Noa Oaw C in =z00 3 Oo ¢Z? oin= ¢p zR- z o �z� S GGQGG 1U1-- V$]Z m O 11 a w �w> dN O O O O W N Q 0 CY� V I w= N w Z p O O U p o U o f Z V f U Q Z d U O N m Y a�5�oo��o �o °a °a as waifs (tothili'Co - oQn 3m. k PO -O.Ads ,6u,nlws wdLf.t - ZLQZ day Ol "CA 6x.p'Z -� \� \sway$ \4� \ll \9f Of \fdVH N x N � w w g g 3 3 Z 2 O O cn w W O w Lo 5 = M XX W dU �w as Q N— J 6 waifs (tothili'Co - oQn 3m. k PO -O.Ads ,6u,nlws wdLf.t - ZLQZ day Ol "CA 6x.p'Z -� \� \sway$ \4� \ll \9f Of \fdVH H n r� z y H \aP,3036 \7\CA0 \Shoels \C \C -3,d.g Ma, 10 Sep 2012 - I37pm smlumer 0 n m r m C D O Z r O O z O m D Z m z z D O C Z —I Z m E O O a vv 0 0 I I II, 11• I" o o �i O O v1 k k Y k � a � m a io s� �� o,� 1J 1 D V I n D r m a v�0 �z< 0 z a SECTOR t v D Nixz _;g 53 =2 m Z m Z m 0 o Ja \Sc vI Z Z 01 �Z z J y m �X XOX a - m T 01 j W _I 0 v 011-: 0001 -: A W ti ➢ � yy Z . Z tJ ZZ V1 O n OA� >�Z m zv v➢ � � o a � 2 °z D �D 72 F mm z m� F, '1 fi- ti A Z oOlti I.I;�O cai �c➢i H z O m C r- r- D Zy m or1 oc� DNn LOO 0 a v A < Zt o_ D m c j. o r— mob C f7O z m a SECTOR t v D Nixz _;g 53 =2 m Z m Z m 0 o Ja \Sc vI Z Z 01 �Z z J y m �X XOX a - m T 01 j W _I 0 v 011-: 0001 -: A W ti ➢ � yy Z . Z tJ ZZ V1 O n OA� >�Z m zv v➢ � � o a � 2 °z ova Co- 1��10, , \00 Y-41 T Soda Meoted by — PEWN00 an 02/17/2011 5 33p D �D 72 HER mm z m� 117 - n'� o�� CD 1 H z O m C r- r- D Zy m or1 oc� DNn LOO 0 m El �u > C) o f C) > < o_ D m c j. Z r— mob C f7O z m >1 �N O C ova Co- 1��10, , \00 Y-41 T Soda Meoted by — PEWN00 an 02/17/2011 5 33p D �D 72 O mm f1n� z� 117 - o�� CD 1 H z O m o y D Zy m or1 oc� DNn N D •'T1 'C` Z r— mob C f7O z m >1 �N O C m z N �OZ Ny z�1 � u v A CD 1 H z O m Verizon Wireless - Old Lynchburg, Tier III 815+ 237+ k✓ Legend �$4Q+ 767+ (Note: ome items on map may not appear in legend) 76 -24 1115± o Ameba" 810 °wMM� "n ".E�m © F -RESC"E S- ON �gGP1 R1t)G 76 - -01- 20002+ ®PoFF, E " ® RESREA,�RRa "RSM 76R1 -03 - -B / x1415+ x18 - 0+ 7681 -01 - -1 B 76 -23A '76R1 01= -45 ?8,714 76R1- 01-- 47832 4 7681 -01 4883876R1- 0,1 -=46 5 76R1 -01- -50844 X829 80 +9� �%� Rf[]G 858 1012 76R1 6123 7fiR1- 01 - -24 880 864 859 1008,y+� '768 Q1 '4086 si 0 ,6R1_01 - -22 r 9.66 05 , 47681 01 - -21 88387.7 " �`` I— 999 ggg�6R1- 01 - -2� 913 7 99076R1- 01 - -19 919 977 9847681- 01 - -17 927 971 C978�1 �6 937957`276�R1- 01 - -16 7i ObI� I -I RA 76R1- 01 - -1A 3 - -8 ° 1044• !/10' 10481 !l �. - All 851 r6gsB 768 =01_3 14 76= 481)9.72 F 925 16 17,25 + 1-/'710+) 76 -45 1 Charlottesville City Identify to launch City G1S --L— 992 7$1 76 -48 � 76 -48G 76P-01-OF-5 a 1004 76P- 01- OF '215676P- 01�- 0¢G -10 7.6P1- 8101+ —_ j<152 15376P- 01 -OG -5 1925+ — 76 -48E 1014 1 1 1 ` 1915+ 76P- 61 {OF -1 143 1830+ �+ � r +,� 76P- 01 -OG -1 �- 76P1- 10101+ 76P- 01 -OE- 40146;142 1:3� 76 -46B 1026 1820 +� - 76P- 01 -OE36 f�- 18 138 76 -48B. 76P-01-OE-54(, 13376P- 01 -OH -9 �-49A 76P, Ii 7101;+ -34 `10'36 1840+ 1 N76P- 01 -0E130 12�76P- 01 -0H -1 012 U 76P1- 410,11 76P- 01 -OD -8 11976801 -01 -10 O• �10'0476R -01114 1845 ✓1� 11976P- 01 -01 -9 780 ! 1 TM 76P- 01 -0C -A 1;4 11� 1000 1850 +� 1635+ r 11576P- 01 -01 -7 1= 1076P -01I.. � 1001 !1'855+ 76P -01 - -1 �7.6P- 01 -OJ'8 103 1009 - -+� 7p6P1 2101+ Urli` 76P -0 I -1 176R 525' 1625+ 76P -01 -OC 1100 114 2 768- 011 - -17 � ■ 715 -- 2 -OC -1 10 y11 7,6P -01 -0d- 1 82076R f01� -29 `'* }i 107t76P- 01 -OJ -1 - 11 .7.6- 1520A+ 7fiP- 02- OC- 46666B7q�il 76 -46F �16�15± '' ti -' 65876P -01 -OA -4101 82176R-01- -30 15y18+ 76P1 -1101+ �67676P -02 - -2 1UL7 11504'+ 100 500+ < F iR�01 --31 ` 1274+ ` f� 76P- 02 =0E -1/ 652 �G[, 0 I z y GIS -Web `'"5;pg+ 9 % �669665,.i 76P- 1)1 -0A -1 3.3 y 33 76-1506A+ -+ 1272 +76- 1274A+ 682 R �,' °0 r Geographic Data Services NN01 682/ www.albemarle.org t -01 - -B 1363 7�72A+ 76P`- 02 -0E -5� / 76 -46C1' 1262+ " �asa)2ss -sas2 Map is for Display Purposes Only • Aerial Imagery from the Commonwealth of Virginia and Other Sources November 2, 2012