HomeMy WebLinkAboutZTA201200009 Legacy Document 2012-12-19 (23)ATTACHMENT D
Comparison of the Current and Proposed
Processes for Site Plans
Current
Proposed
Regulations
Regulations
Pre - application procedure available to allow staff to review
proposed development for key issues and to identify the
No
Yes
site plan's need for variations, exceptions and special
exceptions
Initial site plan submitted
Staff notifies the public (abutting owners) and members of
the Commission and the Board of Supervisors that a
Yes
Yes
preliminary (initial) site plan has been submitted and
informs them of site committee review meeting, which they
may attend
Site review committee reviews technical elements of the
preliminary (initial) site plan and identifies requirements
Yes
Yes
and makes recommendations
For sites within an entrance corridor overlay district,
the ARB reviews the preliminary (initial) site plan for
consistency with the ARB's design guidelines on major
No
Yes
site layout issues and identifies requirements and
makes recommendations on those issues
Abutting owners or members of the Commission or the
Board of Supervisors may request that the preliminary
Yes
No
(initial) site plan be reviewed and acted on by the
Commission (if request made, review action by
Commission is required
Preliminary (initial) site plan approved by the Commission
By the Commission
By the agent only
or the agent if it satisfies all applicable requirements
or the agent
Grading permit may be issued by the program authority
after preliminary (initial) site plan approved, allowing
No
Yes
development to begin
Final site plan submitted
Site review committee reviews the final site plan and
advises the agent as to whether all requirements and
Yes
Yes
conditions of preliminary (initial) site plan approval have
been satisfied
For sites within an entrance corridor overlay district,
the ARB reviews the final site plan and documents
submitted under County Code § 18 -30.6 to consider
Yes
Yes
request for a certificate of appropriateness
For sites within an entrance corridor overlay district,
major site layout issues are considered by the ARB at
Yes
No, except at the option
the final site plan stage
of the developer
For sites within an entrance corridor overlay district,
final site plans that are consistent with major site
Yes
No, unless the
layout issues identified by the ARB at the preliminary
developer elects to vary
(initial) site plan stage are considered
major site layout issues
from the initial site plan
For sites within an entrance corridor overlay district,
certificate of appropriateness issued by ARB prior to
Yes
Yes
approval of final site plan
When all requirements satisfied and all approvals
obtained, final site plan signed by the agent
Yes
Yes
Return to exec summary