HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400050 Review Comments No Submittal Type Selected 2014-10-28•
�,; .
R �
4 s•
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins
- From: Christopher P. Perez, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: October 28, 2014
Subject: SDP- 2014 -50 Acme Stove and Fireplace Center Site Plan- Final
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once
the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have
been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on
further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the
Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
Conditions of Initial Plan Approval (from approval letter dated May 5, 2014:
1. [32.6] A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
Final: See Final Plan comments below. Comment still valid.
2. [32.5.2.1(c)] Boundary Lines. Final: Rev. 2 SUB2014 -102 Iwe,llc /Acme Stove was approved on 9-
30-14. Revise sheet 2 of the site plan to provide the DB Page reference information of the
recorded plat.
1'1 s. .2° :s, a "sk7 a: ° � »5.21offl e C t'Stmh, s�,e,' ords Soinii ole 1 ane 1.s, t)T"t'�')t) 8.'C t €1 e a 13:1 .) i
R.oa,,J, i €`v�ev i% at this di"i'ie It SG i)i1i tIccel)tod tilw ifit', S'tatC'� 1-he ioa(i pni"tion of
rAlich €, s €) this lot I� t t 1l, 4xd to bsc dcdicaled Por i?ublic ri'abi' C1i 'S:£,i w6or to iiti,al iu -,
la -"I xl()'Sii ?'r`s`ti. J. -s "i'iall be i;i ?ii'i "T to ltia i %izi:i rl )€ iti i) €t q)i£Ex,
i µ Re: , a o .z;; cat e43. :u, �,c„ �1`v' ;a>tr. <:.b.x 2 sA t.,;� 0-, i a -11 =.e z.` 6.. 3<s „'K °� „, €; n.
tC et r
3 r
iY
a?
4. [32.5 .2 (m) & (n), 4.12.17(b)] Entrances. "Entrances to parking areas f°om public streets or private
roads shall he designed and constructed in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation
standards... ” With Seminole Lane being a Public Road, VDOT's approval of the entrance is required.
Final: Rev 2. Comment still relevant, pending VDOT approval. See attached 10 -28 -14 comment
letter.
aO� .. � `.' i 1 .I.> €, CSC r f1�7z. aqi ,Ja, era 10I ai,'?i�.t£Z/ €I {Ifs t'LF1`Sil ;,€€ (::; €`i L€`1'.)li`ti,'1.y,
0";61- li i ' 'L' 'dafii:i, hull oc c,"',
X6'1 {r.:I {'tIJL' ` €:g€.f tCtl.0 €,€i- Pw,XX` -f! s r£ i:`:> s (Zi "t '7,.. ' On th.�' pJaP s .,isti t` flu 10 ?lI` r 14 zl �)l.�ted zll. d
?). 1 32.� bAU; : I� - . �'� ���i:;.' 1 �i. `£'£i- :7<:L:£i.` >S�, Jlbc eSiti`ii11.ee ti) t'i€ ; sitc, is 20^ 4'[ b` e'.d i,i "t L,1.,;; staff
a,h.,sn ? es the pile 1:31 °C'.•}% €)yes t €1 11tilize 1.i %£? tl-a ' Reg i2dles ,�. oil the plafl pi,ol iuk" trafl ic
n'no-"':s for baffic VVW25sed.
di 12 tae i�z
to
fii" esUhNnew bul h", no c(nv h�.- less
(2_5/' 15m Q The SRO pkitl assure IJW space is diancnsion.L'd to meei the
abo've
requirenne"An as curremy- R. appears Me length of Me kvidUlly qnce is 20- mid 10' We. KOS
appnjxhaeb% Hmak Comment Wdresmed.
eodon ��'i shol'! in a
al C.? cc,` �;""W', paif""'
bi, Ih,! m.��y z,,"�af bum'per
WAs or jadv be tued tuo yh'az nol 'FV to jP0iM
soldq On Me dw phn asswe Me loadIg ,pace is appropri,,Itcly dchnonmed. as requirod by the
ordinance, Fined: Comment suldressed,
9, All Spaces a km,a a h be 10' is [Jo loy
18' long, (."urntlil ly thel'o Ire belvveen 4 mid . 6 spaces on the p1mi whkh am along a 2W W, which
vuv depkqed as W vvidc. Re ise these to Ii-aet flu" re'Cluired l(Y %vidth
zddrwsed.
10, ), zh0quu3s Jai/ he !;creem?,Ias reqm4 ed .�'2. 7 9 ak
k'Fhvr'� se.-1ion' _'30,6, A.&,,umc the dumnpstor is applcqpl.'iatej� screcliedlL 0.11 fl'l'o finnal "ite plan
provide the ruaierid used W the enclosum ancl Ille, heigAll ofthe io
�n gliciA
atidre
11. [32.5.2(a)] Being this site is located in the Entrance Corridor (EC), approval from the Architectural
Rv6vx Board (ARB) is required prior to final site plan approval.
Final: Rev 2. Comment still relevant, see attached ARB review 10-22-14.
12, [32 --S,2 11.1"le full owimg be, nc quk""'J. tbr siso appi'o� al
g
- infb>rnliltioll inciuding, 11 PRIUMnenic J-"Nui an�d location: and
pkotognnph ol, of each qqw of owd,ml, I undnajrt [Sec, 3 !T8 & Sm. 4 17]
Fkaj; Rev 1. Conament nufaiddraved. On :he;; 1, twdc'r ge.��i�erkl �ri.'-'Aves' .Jgphting' aliflkv.-"D
ohnirn flo'azn*" pa"14. Rocnllam�� ar_ '- cii the Pilau, 'he slhee'." li�s! provHe�'-'� korshev.
71 limVever, 6here kD .n-e' fuglh' lh'n, slmmo 77 i��
p,
in Be plain set. lzv�.Isewp
pro,Adk,'�.'.
id 2
A. p1mi ineethig the ruglimnimits of seuio-n 31..",9 of(lia.,,pier 18 ofthe QW, hicludbg
a tee consonadmi c1muldis F! und; Ca mini ent P dd ressed.
B. 110cmuniendahunj SNvenh4"g, The currell" Imuserves the requked 20 undisunbed buflir
W a"id" the residential diQcq as is ri quimd by the ordinancc, Die PnTosal
gocs ov'_'n fkjrfl.l'.a io pre. cr,-e existing vcgetative screming by prese'i-ving of'501- 'ofexisiing
%vegetation on Me maInged skma. Tbus the screernn�'." 1-cquirenient a! 9w lus offfi�,-_,
'o nc niet,
R.ogardles.,,, Me z1buFflill? prop ell ' ovaier (TNIP 005-B 1-0.5-OA-010,80()) W anitacted staffalxnq Me
propowl and has rcquosted 11.).Q applic"intingw! all EXAMH WV0&ri fhceak€J'16' the prope( Ii.ticat
le uT of We rWge along be pmTof line Wr savening puMoses Im to the wukipmwd hms of
scn' -, propo�sed the de1elopfrant it slicluldalso bt.nottd flui'fllk�" Wilco I ie��s de�_'lopnient
-'ening
and the T° iii W LA devehTnwnt, eaicl.i. pro �j j ded. a 6 — ' il,} lt viii ii'ood-cn i"Q n atop the ride oii .
the property line to Mitigate do loss of exkgng vegewtivo screeningat the bo-uoni of the sl opea," palt
(Idwir WON Slopes,vaivers, �N'Iiile the current pnMowl W not pmjxne to d%mb the slopes
onsRO—nol. am dicst, Wpm defined as mitical slopes auy longel., raliher ffie�): are ao. dofinecl sib
lliali'lged slopes, flius no vaiver is re(juired to dis-'un'b these.slope--�, Ffie current propo.-sal. cut�, tive..s
Amn dw existbig tme Mw at Me rem of die prolwrty at the NAWii of lie nmunIged skqms. Ljwn a
2
site 'tavnvmrs that the Wtes wh Ph are pingmed to be oui currendy provide rn A ority W"
v"' at levol IVA die homw oli die WE ANMI this Ims ot"'hcs�'. l"It
sc-io jij'ag i€; r sms nays signmeamy lrdluecd duic ko due stw xp sloq.-'e zi. T i tlic "'itc
Lo th"w residenhal lots at the nou, of the property,
1"cr discklssionsvtith anvil this developmen! na easemem m their
ploperty, which would a Sw for the Noca6ion of We" seyeening mensures. I f such all easen iVffi' Or
let, an Cmemmumms theal inig, uvvne'
Wmice A samnla cmdd be n1mated U) a distance at the (02) o"f the 'lopc that, v"ould not disnArb
nriclisrurbed buhr, the exithig slope and wouid emble. ille. pres"'n-vation 'oftrees •iat. 1-trovide
screening am% provide mabilizadh—lu ordci lo k� ftic,-c (k�sjred th", a S'a o"'F "o
vnmld hamc m, Lie dc,1cYn.iinu:-d in the lick! at the Wic of le duclopnic-lit or o", 011.
the parcel ti' ni the risidcnlial ICA, ft� tile tlpqil i"--all.r. chooses, to a fF'nce fllc ea'�ernerr[ and thfi'
fo'n.C.Q. should bo d> picicd and labeled or"Alicilli'A Ske pkm'
Figgh It does no! appenr is splAkant is Stewed f1m NVOrking Mich adjacent neightmW as numi
14, JN4,.,�,,V` C)rl she.et I under 'gerlerad. thecaicul".-lii€ -xls
die intbrillation loo Ilarkincp-, ancl, Circiflation Arta' contrl.-idiets the irnbrination oil die siarlle shoot
'c' to as 't �:'3f
ad,acent to Q V*p (Ateralm data Q those exact It :' €23S. l ovis sure only onic. sc
in l'ol-mai ioll is provided. DUQ;
T,(' ` fa'e' I ? munhem m6AW io �he it") .�Coerol"on Dao"�"he 'wovacuvra"�: .4;"("a = j9' 4....
med
15, [CO -vAi"', C)n shect. 3"' Ilia ✓nd h,:indhapped paHdng space adjaccilt to 1110 !,'sain entrarlec should
bo '::i1 'iii or omimxt' as culrcnd� if a car or van pulled into Mr spacy theynamid uvir be able U>
Imck our mnithout backing out to W: erarance to the site or lliftiiq."' the buildifig'. 1e evisx''
FIV. 2 Comment addressed.
C"n . 4teei' I, umkr dw toe of OW pwn pnw we Me SDPm RW die prcJem
17. 1 ANOUXT1 Approved V 1:10 Plans' are prior to final site: plan :ipprovld.
Eng.inec,ring for ful-,he r de flit. AV L 1`JmdWg or
rmh anows al l each si leet ot, we 1:',hii i set, R,,,-v 1", . ("oims.'t<ennc Adk] r emed,
I ;:gym'. FANT I The pinnmed chirom,,y al.-)penm on the she plan wilh the smne-
line vvidfll t.1ti the Lnnikling w-all,;, thus it reads durt Vie Ceatun'A- has walls -'Milich Ho "k , nn-"lace into the
building, 2
20� l," 1".`,,'W Woe (3) Willow Wk Tim, mo (1) 'Do,,.zv ood tree, and eight. (9) HiAtlrN
Gamet Sweet:.,pj.rc Amis mv kmatzdia di o will tic . rs uircd lo approve,
fuogs po "fla abw kwarkm of Mese I pi p l, i ngs.hll e
adoqu,
ately address�,,d Imiar to their approval. if the tives-sue t "l lhrc o
a�
g-rceinc.11 %Jll tw,�,d to be WeAcTed benveml. th.e dc VDCY,1", aii(l 1h :e County� I his docurnent
shall Im devolqed by Te qqWarrt and the, (.'ounh' Allorney and see to rec,)rd
prior to approvfl oftile IMat. On the plan tile DS IPagenumber and the tifie (lC tho Jandscaq)Q
agre"�'lnelit �hafl be 4' fovided (prel:�,l--,ibly oli slieel 5),
.I;
1.<. ...e h4,i<h;
r %slii. t l`li? 3 sw?, i l c; tt.�.:. d zt ?F`. `
fm1V .` .
��'i1ic t.irci'€ a' ;io.l :'.riia b:l. , .,,.>1 all Es'a[So
E.3n ` heef i ? . (.,:i <w i "s flhe ?rk' ;ilan'ba;' : ',rit ?,l..0 :?C .0, 30 hi . P1, ,a e C vi.,
1,0T"'Nifli jli2' -'t;i .t „•:.z.a.<: �i,.is ts; t.x.i:.3 e;i1`C,'t ::l:sc.i <, €u. .L .a, ", ..�.
NEW COMMENT
22. [32.5.2.1(c), 32.5.2(i), 32.5.2(o)] Per County Records Seminole Lane is proposed to be a Public
Road; however, at this time it is not accepted into the State's Secondary System. All the sheets in the
site plan except sheet 2 lists Seminole Lane as "Existing Private R/W' ; however, this is not accurate
as the road is not private, nor was it ever approved to be a private road. Please correct this. On sheet
2, Seminole Lane is provided with blank DB Page Number; however, if this is to remain it shall be
properly filled out.
l° ? - =M
. p�.�� d �(. %Yl.s ?r z -b� ... ztF � rfsPG' � ✓k "';
T
Engineering Comments —Max Greene
1) Site plan approval requires WPO/VSMP approval prior to final site plan approval.
Please see WP0201400076
ARB — Margaret Maliszewski
See attached Oct 22, 2014 ARB comments.
VD0T— Troy Austin
See attached 10 -28 -14 comments
Please contact Christopher P. Perez in the Planning Division by using cperez@albemarle.org or 434-
296 -5832 ext. 3443 for further information.
4
We, N i
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832
October 22, 2014
Scott Collins
c/o Collins.Engineering
200 Garrett Street, Suite K
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: ARB201400090 Acme Stove and Fireplace Center
Dear Mr. Collins:
Fax (434) 972 -4126
I have reviewed the plans with the revision date of October 8, 2014 submitted for the above referenced project
against the conditions of approval outlined by the ARB at the meeting held on August 18, 2014. After reviewing the
revised plans and consulting with the ARB, we have the following comments:
1. Revise the trellis detail to indicate that the oak used to wrap the steel columns will be stained or otherwise
treated to ensure sustainability of the material.
2. Provide for review a complete lighting plan addressing all proposed site and exterior building lights, or
indicate on the plan that no lighting is proposed.
Also, please note that the ARB recommended, but did not require, that cap flashing be provided for the columns to
provide additional weather protection.
Please forward me two sets of revised drawings together with the attached resubmittal form and a memo
summarizing the revisions you've made. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those
changes in the memo. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate
review and approval. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met,
a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Margaret.Maliszewski
Principal Planner
cc: ARB- 2014 -90
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has
indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional
information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to
fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal.
TO: Margaret Maliszewski DATE:
PROJECT NAME: ARB201400090 Acme Stove
Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates Submittal
Code
County Project Number
# Copies
Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E &S)
# Copies
Distribute
To:
Mitigation Plan (MP)
2
Margaret Maliszewski
Waiver Request (WR)
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
Road Plan (RP)
Private Road Request, with private /public comparison
('RR)
Private Road Request — Development Area (PRR -DA)
Preliminary Site Plan (PSP)
Final. Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP)
Final Plat (FP)
Preliminary Plat (PP)
Easement Plat (EP)
Boundary Adjustment Plat (BAP)
Rezoning Plan (REZ)
Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP -CP)
Reduced Concept Plan (R -CP)
Proffers (P)
Bond Estimate Request (BER)
Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D -GWMP)
Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP)
Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP)
Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR)
Architectural Review Board (ARB)
ARB2014 -90
2
Other: Please explain
(For staff use only)
Submittal Code
# Copies
Distribute To:
Submittal
Code
# Copies
Distribute
To:
ARB
2
Margaret Maliszewski
Mr. Christopher Perez
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP - 2014 -00050 Acme Stove and Fireplace Center Final Site Plan
Dear Mr. Perez:
We have reviewed the final site plan for Acme Stove and Fireplace Center dated 7/7/14 with
revisions dated 8/25/14 and 10/8/14 as submitted by Collins Engineering and offer the following
comments:
1. The current submittal has identified the inlet near the proposed detention pond as being
removed. How will the invert be sealed?
2. There is an area on the south side of the proposed entrance that appears to be flat. Will
this area drain or will there be standing water?
If additional information is needed concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(434) 422 -9782.
Sincerely,
Troy Austin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Culpeper District