HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA201300002 Study - Traffic StudyC" EPR, P.C. "ENGINEERING & PLANNING RESOURCES"
637 BERKMAR CIRCLE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, vA 22901
TO: JUSTIN SHIMP, P.E.
ORGANIZATION: SHIMP ENGINEERING
PHONE NUMBER:
RE: PANTOPS CORNER DEVELOPMENT
VOLUME COMPARISON MEMO
MEMORANDUM
❑ URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY
Pantops Corner — Volume Comparison Study
Introduction
X FOR YOUR USE
The purpose of this memo is to provide a brief summary of potential increases in
volumes at the Route 250 / Route 20 intersection for various types and sizes of
developments. The goal of the memo is to demonstrate that likely development
proposals for this site would result in trip generation scenarios that only create a small
increase in overall traffic volumes at the subject intersection (250/20).
For comparison purposes, this study uses the build condition volumes for the pending
Riverside development, in year 2018 once that site is fully constructed and occupied.
The methodology for this study is to provide a percentage comparison for the trip
generation of prototypical development versus the total number of trips in the AM and
PM peak hours that are expected to be at the Route 250 /Route 20 intersection. A
summary table follows, and the excerpted build condition volume graphic from the
Riverside study is attached.
ATTACHMENT II
EPH637 EPR, P.C. "ENGINEERING Hr PLANNING RESOURCES" BERKMAR CIRCLE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
TABLE 1 — TRIP GENERATION VS TOTAL TRAFFIC
The % column compares tw total numhe. of mps Ingress and egress] for that peak hour, versus the projected total mps at the Route 250!Rotae 20 intersection
END OF MEMORANDUM
Attachment: Excerpted total volume graphic from Riverside traffic study.
Page 2
ATTACHMENT II
am
pm
land use
code
unit
Daily
in
out
t ;
in
out
Apartment
220
30
226
3
1 16
Na
15
7
nia
Total
226
20
0.4%
22
0.4%
office
710
10000
1 228
14
2
nla
3 1 12
nia
Total
228
16
0.3%
15
0.3%
office
710
35000
591
48
1 7
n!a
9
43
n/a
Total
591
55
1.0%
52
0.9%
specialty retail
826
15000
665
0 1 0
n1a
25
1 32
nia
Total
665
0
0.0%
57
1.0%
drugstore /pharmacy w;o drive- through
880
12000
1081
23 12
n/a
49 51
n!a
Total
1081
35
0.7%
101
1.7%
fast food restaurant w/o drive-through,
933
2500
1790
66
1 44
nia
33
1 32
Na
Total
1 1790
110
2.1%
65
11%
Coffee Shop •rAo drive- through
936
1200
nia
66
1 64
1 nia
1 24
1 24
n/a
Total
I n/a
130
1 2.4%
1 49
0.840
The % column compares tw total numhe. of mps Ingress and egress] for that peak hour, versus the projected total mps at the Route 250!Rotae 20 intersection
END OF MEMORANDUM
Attachment: Excerpted total volume graphic from Riverside traffic study.
Page 2
ATTACHMENT II
N
d
7
O
U
tC
L
m
co
T-
0
N
T
r
O
in
o`
o�
%Nc;
131
41 £801 /6Zb
o— £9/99
� N
Lam!
6b1 /6b
69L /bZll —i
091/6b
ZZ /61--,,4
M r
v
---- _........ O
f N
M40D
6b1 /6b
rnLO�
N —V
091/6b
�'- £9b /Z9Z
179£l9L£
9£ /LZ
96/9£1
° CO
8bb /919"
�.oLN
N 7- lf)
VLo n
m co co
N
f— 960LI8Zb
�— LLIbL
Ligi
M
89L /££LL w N
9/b `' o
Cl)
IT
L L
CN C14
Az: r-
l)
4b1,8Z
9£ /LZ
1
b£9/668
mc
f— 960LI8Zb
�— LLIbL
Ligi
M
89L /££LL w N
9/b `' o
T- M.
ATTACHMENT II
rM
rµ�
T- M.
ATTACHMENT II