HomeMy WebLinkAboutLOD200400045 Legacy Document 2014-04-21John Shepherd
From:
John Shepherd
Sent:
Friday, December 10, 2004 10:14 AM
To:
Mark Trank
Subject:
RE: FAX Info
Mark,
I must clarify an aspect of this. Parcel 8Z has no development rights. Therefore, no
parcels containing less than 21 acres can be divided from it. However, parcels containing
at least 21 acres could be created from Parcel 8Z. Such a 21 -acre parcel can support one
dwelling. Therefore, the clubhouse could be converted into a dwelling provided it is on a
parcel containing at least 21 acres. I regret any confusion caused by my not first
mentioning the potential to create 21 -acre parcels.
John
-----Original Message -----
From: Mark Trank
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 9:34 AM
To: John Shepherd
Subject: FW: FAX Info
John:
Another question for you. Thanks, Mark
Mark A. Trank
Deputy County Attorney
Albemarle County Attorney's Office
Charlottesville, VA
(434) 972-4067 (voice)
(434) 972-4068 (fax)
mtrank@albemarle.org
This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or
privileged. The information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
use of the contents of this information is prohibited.
--Original Message -----
From: Randall D. SwitzLmailto:randall@appraisalgroupinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 8:24 AM
To: Mark Trank
Subject: RE: FAX Info
Mark:
Thanks for the response. I have one more question: Can the CLUBHOUSE be converted into a
single family dwelling (a house)?
The answer does affect the manner in which we analyze the property. ,
Randy
-----Original Message-----
. 1
From: Mark Trank (mailto:MTr.ik @albemarle.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 4:50 PM
To: 'Randall D. Switz'
Subject: FW: FAX Info
Randy:
See John Shepard's response. If you believe that this may affect the valuation of the
property, please let me know so we can discuss. Thanks.
Mark A. Trank
Deputy County Attorney
Albemarle County Attorney's Office
Charlottesville, VA
(434) 972-4067 (voice)
(434) 972-4068 (fax)
mtrank@albemarle.org
This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or
privileged. The information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
use of the contents of this information is prohibited.
-----Original Message -----
From: John Shepherd
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 4:47 PM
To: Mark Trank
Subject: RE: FAX Info
Mark:
Special Permit 95-12 prohibits any dwellings on Parcel 8Z because the Board of Supervisors'
allocated zero development rights to the golf course parcel.
I base this finding that T.M. 80-8Z has zero development rights on the conditions of
approval of SP -95-12. Condition 1 states, "Development of this subdivision shall be in
general accordance with the Keswick Estate Application Plan dated November 28, 1994 and
revised April 3, 1995 and May 1, 1995." That plan includes a chart titled "Keswick Estate
Development Rights/Lot Comparison." That chart identifies Parcel 8Z as the existing golf
course containing 139.049 acres. The cell under development rights is empty.
The number of proposed lots is 0.
I will deliver a copy of the portion of the plan with the chart.
-----Original Message -----
From: Mark Trank
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:43 PM
To: John Shepherd
Cc: Greg Kamptner
Subject: FW: FAX Info
John:
What do you think?
Mark A. Trank
Deputy County Attorney
Charlottesville, VA
(434) 972-4067 (voice)
(434) 972-4068 (fax)
mtrank@albemarle.org
7
This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or
privileged. The information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
use of the contents of this information is prohibited.
--Original Message -----
From: Randall D. Switz [mailto:randall@appraisalgroupinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:43 PM
To: Mark Trank
Subject: RE: FAX Info
The question is: If I purchased TM 80-8Z on 1/1/03 and wanted to build single family
dwellings on this particular parcel (as though vacant), how many could dwellings I build,
by right?
Randy
--Original Message -----
From: Mark Trank [mailto:MTrank@albemarle.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:32 PM
To: 'Randall D. Switz'
Subject: RE: FAX Info
I'm not sure I understand the question. Are you asking the number of lots that could
theoretically be developed on a parcel of this size?
Mark A. Trank
Deputy County Attorney
Albemarle County Attorney's Office
Charlottesville, VA
(434) 972-4067 (voice)
(434) 972-4068 (fax)
mtrank@albemarle.org
This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or
privileged. The information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
use of the contents of this information is prohibited.
--Original Message -----
From: Randall D. Switz [mailto:randall@appraisalgroupinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 12:18 PM
To: Mark Trank
Subject: FAX Info
Mark:
Thanks for the FAX. Regarding TM 80-8Z, what is the county's position regarding the
number of single family lots that can be legally developed on this one parcel? John
Shepard's email (that you FAXED to me) states that TM '80-8Z has "zero development rights".
I learned a long time ago that planners sometimes make mistakes.
"on the record" and tell me the exact "by right" development potential for TM
80-8Z?
This is extremetly important in deriving the parcel's land value.
3
Thanks
Randy
Randall D. Switz, MAI
Appraisal Group, Inc.
1445 East Rio Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
434-979-3393, Extension 22
434-979-2487 FAX
randall@appraisalgroupinc.com
John Shepherd
From: John Shepherd
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 10:17 AM
To: Bruce Woodzell; Mark Trank
Subject: T.M. 80 - 8Z
Amelia remembered that the development rights for the Keswick development were determined as part of the review of
SP -95-12. It was determined then that Parcel 8Z has zero development rights. I will deliver a copy of the special permit
action letter and the determination memo with the attached list of parcels with their development rights.