HomeMy WebLinkAboutLOD200600031 Application 2014-03-20 (2)Request for �~� C)
Parcel of Record Determination and ori!`'K
���;,
1Jevelol)MeRt �G1 I1L5 .11�! ei ii1111A llu�i
❑ Parcel of Record = $75
9 Development Rights = $40 Ot26—,
Tax map and parcel(s): Tar rYl A�p _10 PQ,recl-l5 3"1 1= E 3 `7 G- Zoning:
RA
Acreage total: Zo s, (,, i i Ac- . Acreage for each parcel: BI u 5 -7. O(.1 Ac.., 3'l F 601 ¢3,
Number of parcels.
3 37EC3l.Iz.�}c.
Location of property (landmarks, intersections, or other): "T� 1 eSZSee�-2 rrn S R X03 �7 CD�ck C�aaa s e
Owner of Record mu.rrc u Zwvesi-mew! �Rbu� �.�-�.- 14iahla,�d 2� Fal'M ���es e�/oSAM�S /Ylurrajj�L'
Address 70o eA---r Y1'MAiu S -T': L+ -e, A� City ST CkAAleS State l e Zip�o6l --22x6
Daytime Phone (434) �5� - 8S7 ( Fax # �FS� ��e� E-mail s;_ A�,e_t L� . (� ih` t�Y t t(��t ��(�,S
Applicant (Who is the Contact person representing?): Q W n e 9 --
Address Address
Daytime Phone ( )
City
Fax # E-mail
State Zip
Contact Person (who should we call/write concerning this project?): ( 6 rn �e
Address 9 1.4 M, o4.ee,l (O U City e-14CL.- � o es V t (e State _ Zip ZZ `jo L
Daytime Phone (134) 9 77' o Zo5 Fax # Zq[a' 52Z6 . E-mail -7� ALP &JAI, . Cay,,
Submittal Reciuirements
1.
2.
9
Tax Map Page
Last Instrument of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia on or prior to
December 10, 1980 that includes a plat or metes and bounds description of the property. (Highlight or underline
references to the subject property). (S e Q 44-vck *^ 4
All plats and deeds of record after December 10, 1980, UP UNTIL/ THE PRESENT DATE. (Hight ght or underline
references to the subject property). S.u.e.. 4 440jC 0N0V_ " I C 1,q- 5) ted'
Any other pertinent information. c=C *%CA b 4,-T 2, -P A
Cover letter stating the assumed number of parcels and development rights, with explanation of same.
A fee is required for each separate parcel shown on the tax map. tom'
��4 A a AA ')A&6�_A AA -A 71(— —,, (6 G
S' a of Owner or Authorized Agent Date `
File Number/ %W J"'- Fee waived? YES / NO Fee amount
County of Albemarle Department of Community Develop8�' �� � .
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: ( 34) 9 -4
/
COMMUNDEVELPM 1 of 1
LAND SURVEYING
ENGINEERING
LAND PLANNING
J. THOMAS GALE, L.S.
MARILYNN R. GALE, L.S.
WILLIAM J. LEDBETTER, L.S
EDWARD D. CAMPBELL 111, L.S.
October 13, 2006
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOC., INC.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
John Shepherd, Zoning Division
Dept. of Community Development
Albemarle County, Virginia
914 MONTICELLO ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
PHONE (434) 2934251
(434) 977-0205
FAX(434)29&5220
INFO@ROUDABUSH.COM
WILLIAMS. ROUDABUSH, L.S.
RE: Request for Development Right Determination of Parcels 37E, 37F and 37N of Tax Map
70, owned by Murray Investment Group, LLC, - Highland Ridge Farm Series, James C.
Murray, II, Trustee.
Dear John:
The purpose of this request is for determining development rights for land valuation in
conjunction with putting the subject parcels into a conservation easement. Relative to this request
please find the following information:
Attachment 1: Plats of record from May 16, 1978 to present. Please note the following
comments:
Comment a) The plat at D.B. 646 p.752 shows property purchased by Daniel E. Ford on May,
1978 deed starting on p. 750. This plat shows the tax map and parcel
configuration as of 1980. In my opinion, knowing the County's interpretation of
how many rights this property had in 1980 seems to be very relevant to the request
under consideration for reasons that will become clearer upon your review. If you
ignore State Route 637 in determining the development rights of this property in
1980, my interpretation would be that parcels 34, 35 and 37 each had 5 rights and
parcel 35A had one right for a total of 16 development rights for lots less than 21
acres. If the fact that SR 637 cuts through "then' parcels 35 and 37 could yield the
interpretation that the northern portion of parcels 35 and 37 could be considered
separate parcels (my recollection is that this was a valid approach at one time), the
northern portion of parcel 35 (approximately 5.0 acres) would yield 2 additional
rights and the northern portion of parcel 37 (32.7 acres) would yield 5 additional
rights, for a total of 23 development rights.
Comment b) The plat recorded at D.B. 712, p. 654 and D.B. 714, p. 96 was done by our office
to rearrange the aforementioned tax map parcels shown on the plat at D.B. 646, p.
752. The purpose of the plat, as far as I know, was to accommodate re -selling the
propertyto-Builder-Marts-and James-Murray,-II—Because there -are -no
development notes on the plat, it is my interpretation there was no intent to change
n
the number of rights. However, as a result of our plat, parcels, A, B and C, which
included the same land shown on the plat at D.B. 646, p..752 and known as
parcels 34, 35, 37 and 35A of Tax Map70, became known as 37E, 37F and 37,
respectively of Tax Map 70. Also, I think it is important to note that James C.
Murray, II (Trustee of the Murray Investment Group, LLC, which owns the three
parcels for which the development right determination request is being made)
eventually purchased all the land previously owned by Daniel E. Ford, but he
acquired it using different plats, and he did not acquire it all at one time.
Attachment 2: Composite map showing all parcels previously purchased by Murray and the 4
plats used in the purchases. Note the composite map also shows the current tax
map parcels and owners.
Attachment 3: Same composite map in attachment 2 showing the location of the original tax map
parcels acquired by Daniel E. Ford in May 1978, and in existence in 1980, shown
on the included copy of the plat recorded at D.B. 646, p. 752.
Attachment 4: County Tax Map 70, color shaded to show the following:
1) Red shading denotes parcels 37E, 37F and 37N, for which the development right
request is being made.
2) Green shading denotes the three parcels sold off by Murray to persons outside the
family. Parcels 37G and 37F1 are 21 acres or greater and did not affect any rights.
Parcel 37H was 10 acres and used one right.
3) Blue shading denotes the four parcels that were created for family members. Of
the four parcels, only parcel 37 is less than 21 acres, and used one right.
Attachment 5: Recorded deeds from May 12, 1978 to present relevant to the property/properties
under consideration.
Conclusion: I feel that the three tax map parcels in question should have the same number of
development rights as the tax map parcels in existence in 1980 and shown on the
plat recorded in D.B. 649, p. 752, an dated May 16, 1978, less 2 rights used to
create existing tax map parcels TMP 70-37 and TMP 70-37H (see comment 2 and
3 under Attachment 4).
Please advise if you would like to meet and try to eliminate any confusion that may exist
with this request.
Sin4cerely, �� p
V 'C3
Tom Gale, L.S.
/tr
Attachments