HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400054 Review Comments No Submittal Type Selected 2014-12-11OF
J�
�'JRGINIP
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
12 -11 -14
Chip Votava, PE
Michael Baker Jr. Inc
272 Bendix Road, Suite 400
Virginia Beach, VA 23452
RE:. SDP - 201400054 Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station, and Water Main Project —
Major Site Plan Amendment
Mr. Votava:
Your Major Amendment application has been reviewed. In front of each comment staff has provided
references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to
date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may
be found under "Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org.
In order for the amended site plan to be approved the following revisions are required:
1;o .,1E ,1';a
(. �OHHl ISS1 . €1 F`[ 3i' lo, final 9.l. €: T'he rt t:s�d otii ip"', , xS to c
I?tii 43s is €i;: 1 ";.1 it;?4 <i lx.i 'P.<1s %',i to flit:. z3i i, i?I21z €- :,,z?iYii'i "11:. 1011 N.S E Yi ?A1 ?i1 ? t ?t,t 'i% ; €; iid i cif;
v
2. [32.5.2(a)] Setbacks. On the cover sheet of the plan assure that the setbacks for the water tank are
listed as 1 to 1 based on the height of the tower. As proposed the site requires two special
exceptions both to reduce the required setbacks to property lines (rear and side). A request has
been submitted and is being processed. Prior to final site plan approval the special exceptions
should be listed on the cover sheet of the site plan to include their approval date.
Rev 3. The Special Exception for setbacks was approved on Dec 3, 2014 by the BOS. Assure
the following note is provided on the cover sheet of the site plan under setbacks:
"Setbacks for the Water Tank are 1 to 1 based on tank height. The tank is 35' tall.
Special Exception was approved on Dec 3, 2014 by the BOS to allow a 32 foot side setback and a
20 foot rear setback subject to the following conditions:
1. The Albemarle County Service Authority (the "Authority ") shall obtain a landscaping
easement (the "Landscaping Easement") on Tax Map and Parcel Number 093A1- 00 -00-
00400 in the location shown for the "Prop. 20' Landscaping Easement" on the Site Plan —
Grading Plan and Landscaping Plan (the "Plan" ), last revise Novem er 4, -2014, - — -
attached hereto, subject to the following:
A. Any tree shown on the Plan whose trunk is located within the Landscaping
1
Easement shall be preserved and maintained by the Authority;
B. If any tree within the Landscaping Easement dies, is removed, or is otherwise cut
so as to no longer provide the screening intended by this condition as determined
by the Director of Community Development, the Authority shall promptly submit
a landscape plan that complies with Albemarle County Code § 18- 32.7.9 and
which will provide screening as provided by Albemarle County Code § 18-
32.7.9.7;
C. After the landscape plan is approved by the County, the Authority shall install
and thereafter maintain.any landscaping shown on the approved landscape plan;
D. The Zoning Administrator may allow minor variations in the location of the
Landscaping Easement provided that the screening purpose of the Landscaping
Easement is satisfied; and
E. The deed of easement and easement plat for the Landscaping Easement shall be
subject to review and approval by the County before they are recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia.
2. If the Authority does not obtain the Landscaping Easement as provided in Condition 1, it
shall:
A. Submit a landscape plat that complies with Albemarle County Code § 18- 32.7.9
and which will provide screening as provided by Albemarle County Code § 18-
32.7.9.7 to the equivalent extent practicable that would have been provided under
Condition 1, as determined by the Director of Community Development; and
B. After the landscape plan is approved by the County, the Authority shall install
and thereafter maintain any landscaping shown on the approved landscape plan."
t: £) l£ < €,po!1.1 11I£it al-1 ' of ffic of t 1 :?tl :> Y appj €.?v:.'£ .i €;.t:.. £..> lei.: U*c Smi�ol) ` it.c
Nall T'2-1 t £it €£ ?.( -sR 'tlle be1'i =�
1 ,
fl2 dllq 3lziii,
. x i L �, .01 s €ft t",) C)-- 33s.ti>?cd 1(it: "d; :I i1f f 1.
81 W) €.: f: lwo-1ld€:'d oyl l.l:.• Sh e S- 2£,3' €r's.'i "77.3
t.3tii "t.>i ss(:': on 57) f; 4 0 3jf; . R (I,:1 I: v. .'
pica;se a Ss Ir; fl ` 1:a)pio w "lyi :rlt c€
?tlitti qg, is ii: "12 .K:£i, 'rib t'd :. nd sifl3€ t ed, Y7'fe' 3f?;7 s. r ,,,;,'r7I" t, r``77 ;f7 1`s':.7`f',
o lt7 IS:. tf
t'Y €lSti£: it .`ll %i1e sTe€:'., kC ?1i,J (.e., €i:I t.' _iii l �..
to fllf'
5 tl- l €Ctcr 't�)e $.H le £)PfflK:.:.1 €� pix1;1 t5 hat appears tf�= be fa €> . �.. S ? �3d'£)j�'.� P.
Tll'?1 ii 1 "< ili 'L: I,Z, Nhe, „10 j -04 1 1 t's.[. £% Li?t3ty£;:,
" " ")iecl il(tll' €x:3 1 , to ,,,,Void coi-,fll l(�1i. -",idler l' oullt d , miiii ih el €-ldr) � ; ?l' � .?t�' dlai l€ � ail ,ia.,
j5i "E) LCi' ztz7lll iwl" cal also 7l' €)vix.t£, : lf- t.�' $ l"ORX"i i"slllll�:- t: .'SDiF 201 -i'h.fjor C € R'
_. C& .: a-u 's, eWJ
6. the . I� if l c { £ ro'U d Swr :5 3 ; .: £173 , tl ,,q)
�Itiuoll ".)-n 1 � a. r'1 . l:I.l.l 't }} `YP` I1- iY�'L ,1.; the dtI ��le3l.l�� `1 s£' lam? tc.tl
fl—,
t
Fire '11UaI'IiolC, u,
7. 2i
,.2151 s".
j f
.ts..>,e.�,iit [h I£,
e; i
.:..f,€,�t. t� l€
„77.- { � I: r.t, ':^• - €?a, .gill s
:1, ,arh, t. . 1 1ti i.ii
(�Ita.lz.i.t�;3hta�l,l. tit? 3< ;;ll•lri.:
"CC `Z)tllFL.1.' ....,x
>.� „- f.'';�4'�w.
2
WTJRJ (amind honwwhm' Om I , wnd:.r I'u"fr 1 an'k it'nd
Markm iq lisoud; lumevorda Fh'e kathyi is also (m".
Sk On K Pon PRwide'61"', and Hhe
1 A TWIQ Gi Me phn paw We the, pax""t" lsis'k
Pro , IQ, is Sul! w R, "pr oiler� wiHin, , lV.1 A.-,', W 14", 1 ia 'v ilLige, at k3lt rin I and
Co& A DenkTmenl. Asmwc W, kfoi'inaofioin is no'tcd on "';iavi*
11 7W10H Nwiclo Himpaveincm Y 1 Rw Wh
a) s: hrav'.� lway Cbzm 0.
13. all uvin'ol��a'-,'s being uyd by W, dk an"J" providiL,
i-ngres�z and
WTOWS 10 0gHH,V'U"W'."fiC Me she, A c,,-n p�Ige Z""' Ohe �')roposed 20,';
is ii izii im". wa.s'. .2'.-IF v;id' is still
14.1132.521141 SAC,
15. E12 5 "'2
'Provid 01", noaxi'mu".'a acf-Qa�e; by eac.h usc
I& ovwatl
' squaru
gc'
17 I 6 .,'f "'noaii!c inwel Provi!,,k a yi.gnatmro' f) is` if Wl WC T=Jow'rs to si, '�l 1 SAC plan
Rev 1. Comment addrussed.
18. !Commakt] CM the SHP& POWNeMe Wbrmadokas it= o skm- is sc'r- ed h? pubjj(;
19. sme PnwMg Or I Wnum heigWAW pwpowd
20. F�,23',"�-5,2(";0"", ("m sb('�et 1 ""wdcr uax rina.'r, parcel WInnathni n, Sure ,""N P"Yrccls" i'livol" cd] il2 flv"
pixwool as Sn"], 111"�""cv
21 112Wh SWI(d)j Provide the sowrcQ. 11K,'Nev ]", « "', 'advdre<' Sed'
22. 131121h Provide hibiamlion regaiding pad"'ing propo ed' u.se'
WWI, lunamuch is regived W-Me goNsed use, if Whamd Who K to be USA a ING
pswkin "flan'
shall be furni�fiod 'wid an ("�'.q' ?a on io how am 1m; Unes WOW ov.sp Ni
acc(nninodate the pwthg ngreernent. e.?f
pm'kzag"'Iiw Ums RRV 1. d, :rte.., addrooK
23. 132.52(W] K)vide Me madunmi co"�er on 'the site,
Rev 1. Comment addrened.
q 4
24
�.
.> >, _.." .am
z 1, :i`i U „ "ac:i't'I ", r lOHI J < 1,. t. yi i lf:iw
26. [32.5.2a,k,l)] Verify that the location(s) of all existing or proposed utilities and utility easements
including water, sewer, drainage, telephone, cable, electric and gas are shown on the plan. Label
any existing easements with the. Deed Book and Page Number.
Rev 3. Comment still relavent. Once the proposed onsite and offsite easements are recorded
please revise the plan to provide the DB page information. Please be aware that what is
depicted on the recently submitted easement plats for the project do not match that which is
depicted on the site plan. Assure these two documents match. Thanks
27. t "yam ra, h as nQ telli,Si il..•:' t, €.,HH 1L < >E.. 12a. La <;,. ) z.z> E'}I ? {w zi.?t€ t i $s? S =,'}
c't`.t . y ?<i no t3l ?T,, iy >'. zh s =ttLc }ii €1.i1f ;?E;£$:1 31I a<. r ue r ;s... o
28 '2. T 4s ",
29. [Comment] As proposed off -site easements are required, easement plats must be submitted,
reviewed, approved and recorded prior to Site Plan approval. Deed Book and Page reference
information of each recorded easement shall be listed on the site plan. Specifically for:
"Proposed 20' Permanent Easement ", "Proposed Variable Width Permanent Easement
"Proposed 10' Temporary Easement" , and "Proposed 20' Landscaping Easement" on TNT
093A1- 00 -00- 00400. Please submit easement plat(s) to the County to facilitate these items. Also,
for the landscape easement provide a maintenance agreement which shall be reviewed /approved
by the County Attorney and will be set to record with the plat.
Rev 3. The proposed offsite easements have been submitted and are being reviewed. Please
be aware that what is depicted on the recently submitted easement plat for the project does
not match that which is depicted on the site plan. Assure these two documents match. Once
they are approved and recorded in the clerks office please revise the plan to provide the DB
page information.
, ,;t�t< �rFj; �S -E3i`x L }s` c'Cd:`;iilt's 1i £. ` <' f�g c! +z£,' , t C;( %W7 /A,(
P
tf 0 , s'.i t €3..l:.'z?�
30. _ <
S< ?E;C`r {;, "ci 3 l < 3, a (i - uli H 1.1 ^sc' it oi, " 1'a -1 t., €J'ith is no ii'
�ts?�s w'rt i' -d z" :i't:,' Cf < ` } 14.£ £ €.'t <�E .IBt(? �h. €d €„ �cak f ciffii, "s" , t�' iii` ���'.
31.: s }, r; r,,.i "<'Ir i?£3t illct,tE "tii. , t1i` ; €aF 3 Llt.d: ffic plan g! :"'ic €? . nol? -:.^ t liH"
'l-leel < a1i' ',„tail:> l o ixti& J.nlmqp, x,i_Id ,fltii; ,€ F., >:Ind ,.t i ;. V I.[ i cIss f?rlbl% ( e
i;n of nof,,:� s. ;i t:how ": €3s ;is or d. f;i' <lt ;? arc sitL pfxii, z..:. €Ibt;r!! rovi�dc ffic
qq
h It'ai� \3i� S;tssll ijfi'n t`i� i J 13 E °�s �o r w s sx r. ,.x= t o
1 d €,e's € n -s.�1c:'n 8. Ste. �.: o,-,n m _ ... ,..9 ..,a._.
:t } rt I dhc, ' � : 1 1tsts _ >,, jr,ia csh, iit1YY a:o i "< orliv § 3<i. <U, XV, t i.s 'C' � t q hu)
..I�� , t Ii -s� ' i <i �' -E:%i' ti € s i.l, S =a: Ida: .%S'
C{plain �i`('ny arc, «'isi'it €et< floj 2 thl pi . in s ,,,ia to bt
Ale,
Td them _is' €lle If fllci tip: not �t3 -i'; I } 'tip ; _?ti €1 g.ii f" € t s; Z I sJl,° { L I?i(€0 a ?S
t 1 <} 1st ?s c.tt s , �1L11i: 1e'.i £'< SY S ctji 3, s? :y ici1 ? , '...r, : "_ "® R) ..s
4
32 J'f% t ;:1? ,... ., n, c= i..iw.£i....g �,,, (. €.. 2,1 .,....
z
Y€
...? 1 "s 1£1(, ;a ) , i';
F j¥
."'?.iI Lh%ti
33 . 13 . - 2"i ..r, ; ; :t c k�.: y �
, ii't(ti
t
€. €iS:.w�€ i,.i�.:. €e? E11c .l £1� 1 � iw _ .t x.. :...16111�,h.z..w11€ Tzi;
h'i.T: i 3 ltp? i l<l.a ?:?lw ili: .,,? , #i tti Tii111.;Lztilil t<4,t,a >w£i %lT1M? lxtc e C i i.Ti$x _ipki r iiiei F. 03 L: i €;T
34. [32.6.20) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7] Screening. Existing trees may be preserved in lieu of planting
new plant materials in order to satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements of section
32.7.9 subject to the agent's approval. Specifically some of the existing trees within the proposed
20' landscaping easement are between 20' - 80' tall and have a mix of deciduous and evergreen
trees present. Please verify the above on the site plan on the existing conditions page and
landscape-plan. Upon verification, it may be appropriate for the existing trees to be preserved as
undisturbed buffer area, as mature trees will provide superior screening of the tower from day
one. If the existing mature trees within the 20' landscape easement are determined by the Agent
to be adequate to screen the facility the following shall be followed:
The landscape plan should show the trees to be preserved, the limits of clearing, the location and
type of protective fencing, grade changes requiring tree wells or walls, and trenching or tunneling
proposed beyond the limits of clearing. In addition, the applicant shall sign a conservation
checklist approved by the agent to insure that the specified trees will be protected during
construction. Except as otherwise expressly approved by the agent in a particular case, such
checklist shall conform to specifications contained in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook, pp III -284 through III -297, and as hereafter amended. This checklist must be signed,
dated and included on the plans.
Rev 3. On sheet 6 please omit the previously requested note to avoid conflict with the
conditions of the Special Exception approval by the Board of Supervisors. Remove the
following note from the plan: "If the existing preserved trees within the 20 foot offsite
landscape easement are cut down or die, the easement holder (ACSA) shall be required to
revise the site plan to plant the required screening per section 32.7.9.7 of the Albemarle County
Ordinance. "
35 z >n� r s... t,�� : ,:� 1. .;27 7 ?; ? ... "P ,t t >iI €_ ,??£ zrt , eq ftii' rt IJz£.,rt »a,n�..
.S'il '3, ? iJr'" c: i't sl t £Y ' .:,e js;l on .1 o c; ..?
3 fix i > i '^ �'� °, Fx• <r t (: .i. ;
> (n'� £rf3_<.•F!, «t.. S �, �tZf,'3zim tt:.;s. E.s t. it. .3- t. c.. , -.;`t £FS L'€ ;i „� }.€3
..? ?£' r ?fe'C`<�?`i'�.�sl
s %t'geiaih -e 4x17 r II?1? �f.h
€.3 1':1L:1 1'Ife Ai €` €t?ve tlle lc.i3d= ic<1p5: 13xtxi €ii il I i't, Ie�..iS:d is
? hhili ilia `:id Va l`ool"Ick, all the . el35c Slc;�.0 ni, ? iodl J% v,- -” fi �`3 ?� _ti�c?l.i. t cc"i, it iii�11" be
ap pi'opa iaw to cont'iltue kitili -irig 'leylaw _V pres,, ilt place, €,! "die 'Ne te Holly • 0'1'
i€; al- ,?Jitlt' ant, lilay {; ti?f =;(; 00 utilbX .i(3ln'i of i�,r ti )J- )rovedl ('€;i €y!t ti 1_i '. �_ "i C.' to assSIlre,
Qv e ?_ec.1.1 tj.,o , i >i<.it'fw€ on cantei ", Ako., t h
sillp) l a, RuniTTlitni.i:s i deep �'i.11re,,it:3L its onk 1'.1, c Iso cs: wince 'it; �.)Ia'tlllt2 stri
alit ?¥';l.:l ? i io tbc f #tlW.r sl c; 1't,liw `,Aki €:iidk and", ':t' y, I?l.` ,1`31' 1 ilk £? 0 "sMV -, llia h
�^ ? Q 'YOM = zy --
i .,i1. € i '11 tYIC t . +bwi TTl .1 € xti. , .. I. Se,
�p.b�"° Ilxy�:9
p tt f
1 �nra.3:,.a.: ssx
K K !I inns S I robot
my), at m mil nQ hml WN at one of 1,,`,,,.;� ?Ls
lay Indl 2m Kom No WT days due to w4d 5A
dmHoge due W 1,x.. 1121.11.-'...,-� lb��
gFV*�,K.j n-,c�
it aid in the npPenmooce of n nwre loatunk Us. WaNexper; Asy the Suggeoly!
andug.-,", no-e be hmAmd open no.Y,--e, i� e", el
of the snecial exceSon than the Whap!
you Won 1) VnWay. 1"we a
wit. l,-, i,ri 'i
ade,puatc, of th,�,,,vpplicaal is mable lo pmerve thera mid AMC gKs W new PkimhYs
amm the to U'vin"'." is Provid"", rovv o �' cver�p'etn) treu i", u i 6, to 'd 1",
CKj ti; cd to Incef Al mholnum ncrov&". U awy be appropna to caritunl�, o0-Ni I.Anudl
qNss' in the sumnyl mw in the applic"arl'i. cho"".'se [o udlia soult omve-,-
evergreen We. ReVe U) mure double rim, ofevergreen Wes p1mired 15' on
no meat no! OPPHealde as ex6ung luahme nev.,, �n,,re
36. 3
bamdwy of Me paveon 110 Sam is io be
r"siArm'i'ally Zoned pincels per Als,,,,, ,0i,h 'i.hw 1,-"ropo'saL cle"'i-ri-ng is ba!�%inqg 'pk"ot" to the
resid,,.ntially mmmd in! call..'ses th�,,, k)", to, vis".itblc
from toned 1W TV Wh of Sm J,,c'ms pl'ovidk: vvhkAh nleo,is [ti'
Rev L The looh%um depth Dw existing vegetathn- a oo-
Wegetash"n As scni'-,,-,,"-,�,-,ug is 20' de, ln 'u'aReet tl.',?',se
owdomwe the appueant cou eNhey juvAle 20,
die 1(1 W F 010ANg leghgomm as and Own Ed a 4' -... 6' fa l, -,,r
in smy ouklixg PgWing PwPowd with Ux' She phmn? It' so,
fixtures) mm be Mwwn on a Hgkhg PIA dmil WOUdes a
pli<m)l-necric, Plan, luminmire cut �� , hects, lbr cach
GO Me Nghd ng &P Pmok the not OT Me
AW, on the Phuy Hghlimi, "Eaeh ryy
Ahzekhul lo. , rech2n'.- o'd naroads",
'Th"e.5,piffi'ver. q"Z�v n ug fh�,,m onm� pmhlie'. ;'ml Or
j '? j
EUIIUM; no?r on
Ahm, an the p1mi pnnide the Ught"N on,, TV AID, (FJ,�o �,as a
Ught kos Favormf 11) NOV 3. cmnamm� m
provide m daW and description of ro�i, jcrri spccifiH; io
sub'Inival ti) "tie llev L Comment mxldrcsscd
39. In ac -wi fli i he
od, , ice. � )dc :i�t' afe topel7f'a il S,
to,.s u bn i i t a rev i cd Imal rile 1plar,, t(.,,adh-mvf.,,-.-,,,,,fl requirements wilhin ; x t6) morah-s- aflerlh,-�
ofthi..S 101-ter th-0 "ipplicatiol'), alwall bc, dc,'�;imxillibo h,,vc bmn WuntaQ mANdiawn by the
:� l
40 t
2': £ a I:.' .. .,.; t S£ << a r£z
h f ;xi.:d<x.S yo ,.. t be :'r !<t < Taf;;•i 777r' r;iLsd
i": 0",
r
'h /e
�'� -�?'E i uii r .I. ;3r£ £ la's �,%i ..�; .1 s i'. t (a�, 57;£3 �, t„ tf.�1�£' S.k �< f , °•- `'c.Jt.t�z'.; €1 t:I ��..:�, %�stYt ttltt. ,. <��,.t�_
V.k
41 . (ffic �i (`£ �' �3 oaf .E;.: c:.iI ..5( .'. €,I -:'II;
%. iit 61?^ fl 'e
If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me. Below I have provided
comments from the various Site Plan Committee (SRC) reviewers. Prior to final site plan approval
their comments shall have been adequately addressed.
Engineering — John Anderson
No objections all comments have been addressed for the site plan. Pending approval of the WPO plan.
VDOT — Troy Austin
Comments attached dated 11 -24 -14
Sincerely,
Christopher P. Perez
Senior Planner
7
_ 7
�6XCfJ(0'Y
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
November 24, 2014
Mr. Christopher Perez
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP - 2014 -00054 Glenmore Ground StorageTank, Pump Station and Water Main
Dear Mr. Perez*;;
We have reviewed the site plan for the Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station, and Water
Main project, with the latest revision date of November 4, 2014, as submitted by Michael Baker Jr.,
Inc. and offer the following comments:
1. Bollards at the corners of the vault are considered a fixed object hazard since they are within
the clear zone of the roadway. We are not as concerned with the vault causing the hazard. We
are more concerned with the vault becoming damaged or VDOT equipment becoming
damaged during mowing or snow removal operations.
Please provide flexible reflective delineator posts. See sections 6F.73, Tubular Markers, or
section 6F.88, Delineators, of the latest Virginia Work Area Protection Manual.
VDOT has no additional concerns provided comment number one is addressed. If you need further
information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at (434) 422 -9373:
- - -- -- WE= KEEP - VIRGINIA - MOVING -
yit
COMMONWEALTH of 'VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper. Wginia 22701
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
November 24, 2014
Mr. Christopher Perez
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP -2014 -00054 Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station and Water Main
Dear Mr. Perez:
We have reviewed the site plan for the GIenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station, and Water
Main project, with the latest revision date of November 4, 2014, as submitted by Michael Baker Jr.,
Inc, and offer the following comments:
1. Bollards at the corners of the vault are considered a fixed object hazard since they are within
the clear zone of the roadway. We are not as concerned with the vault causing the hazard. We
are more concerned with the vault becoming damaged or VDOT equipment becoming
damaged during mowing or snow removal operations.
Please provide flexible reflective delineator posts. See sections 6F.73, Tubular Markers, or
section 617.88, Delineators, of the latest Virginia Work Area Protection Manual.
VDOT has no additional concerns provided comment number one is addressed. If you need further
information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at (434) 422 -9373.
Sincerely,
Shelly A. Plaster
Land Development Engineer
Culpeper District
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
�pF A
vt�r�1Q
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: Glenmore Ground Stg. Tank, Pump Station & Water Main - Major
Plan preparer: Chip Votava, PE; Michael Baker, Jr. Inc [272 Bendix Road, Suite 400, Virginia
Beach, VA 23452 — cvotava(a)mbakerintl.com ]
Owner or rep.: Jeremy M. Lynn, PE; Albemarle County Service Authority, 168 Spotnap Road,
Charlottesville, VA 22911 [ jl nnnnkserviceauthori , .org ]
Plan received date: 31 July 2014
(Rev. 1) 16 September 2014
Date of comments: 3 September 2014
(Rev. 1) 3 October 2014
Reviewer: John Anderson
Planning Coordinator: Christopher Perez
Major Site Plan Amendment (SDP201400054)
(A site plan is a record of zoning compliance on the property. It should not include VSMP plans)
(Rev. 1) Comments 1 -12 addressed.
Code Chapter 18 section 32, part of the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Title pg. Label major roads on Location Map to help orient project.
2. Label existing parking, East Rivanna VFD, sheet 4 and across site plan sheets.
3. Revise Legend, sheet 2, to include SAF, TS, MU, and TP (VESCH symbols).
4. Show Managed Steep Slopes on TMP 79 -25A on sheets 4, 9. Ref. County GIS, Overlay District, and §8-
30.7.5.d. —Re- establish existing grade; do not construct fill or cut slopes on Managed Steep Slopes (none
are proposed).
5. Provide pipe end wall and revised surface contours for proposed 42' L pipe, sheets 5/22, # 19, below.
Covering exposed pipe (with riprap) is an unorthodox approach. Propose final contours that accommodate
pipe with end wall design. Eliminate need to partially embed, leaving exposed, 28 LFt of 18" DIA
concrete pipe.
6. Sheet 5: It appears that Ex. pavement (VFD) will be cut to install two 18" DIA storm pipes (124', 42').
Furnish pavement cut, repair, depth details. Provide accompanying pavement notes.
7. If new easement is required between Glenmore Way (inbound /outbound) in the area north of Steamer Drive
(sheet 6), show proposed new temporary and permanent ACSA utility easements.
8. Sheet 7: Locate drain field on TMP 093A1 -00 -00 -00400 if drain field boundaries known.
9. Sheet 9/10: Confirm variable width permanent easement is proposed between bracketing, 20' wide
proposed permanent easements.
10. Edit notes, sheet 18, to remove reference to "Station X +XX," "Sheet XX," and "XX -inch culvert."
11. Sheet 18: Revise note to meet VAR10 inspection frequency requirements (VAR10, Part II, F.). Link:
http: / /www.deq.vir ig nia.goy/programs/ water/ stonnwatermanagement /vsmppermits /construction eg neralpenn
it.aTx
12. Sheet 19: label Glenmore Way (cul -de -sac).
New /minor — Label for 4' Manhole obscures text (sheet 5); please shift label.
Comments below pertain to required VSMP application: (Rev. 1) Applicant states comments will be addressed in
VSMP submittal (12 -Sep 2014 comment response letter).
13. Submit VSMP Application, ref. §17 -401, 17 -402.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
14. Label feature that appears to be a stone entrance, sheet 5. Feature does not appear to be a CE or generator
pad (S end of Ex. parking lot).
15. Sheet 7: provide CIP at Ex. 18" RCP storm drain, Inv. 388.80, sta. +48, after 12" water line installation is
complete.
16. Confirm that project limits of disturbance =1.497 Ac (total Area of Disturbance across all plan sheets. Ref.
sheet 18, Existing Site Conditions).
17. Provide orange safety fence (SAF) between project limits and areas accessible to the public: Fire Station,
Glenmore Way (including cul -de -sac), and Steamer Drive, per detail, sheet 20.
18. Provide L x W for riprap outfall protection at 62'DIA, 35'H water tank, across plan sheets.
19. Provide L x W for revised riprap outfall protection at proposed 42'L @ 2.2% slope 18" DIA concrete storm
pipe (sheet 5, 22). —see #5, above
20. Show on -site stockpiles, if any.
21. Identify off -site stockpile, waste, or borrow areas.
22. Revise Management Strategy, Note 6, sheet 18, to reference plan authority authorization and approval
needed to remove ESC measures. See Sequence of Construction Note 10, sheet 23, as template.
23. Sheet 18: ACDSM General Construction Notes for ESC plans now number 1 -20; please replace 1 -22. Link:
http: / /www. albemarle. orWdepartment. asp ?department= cdd &relpaae =4447
24. ESC: Revise CE labels across plan sheets consistent with Project Narrative, Structural Practices Narrative.
Revise CE label to: temporary raved wash rack (PCE). —see sheet 18.
25. Replace or supplement CE detail, sheet 20, with paved wash rack detail, per ACDSM, below. —see #24
26. Sheet 22 appears to provide sufficient information to evaluate SWM plans against Virginia Runoff
Reduction Method Redevelopment Worksheet, but reserve comment on SWM plan not yet submitted.
27. Sheet 22: Show bioretention bed W x L dimensions in plan view: 13' x 26'.
28. Sheet 22: Provide 1.1 CFS 100 -yr storm event calculation/s.
29. Sheet 22: Specify frequency for 0.5' depth of water above the bioretention area.
30. Sheet 22: Provide sizing calculations or design summary for grass swales leading to bioretention bed.
31. Submit SWPPP for project, ref. §17-405. LOD, item #16, VPDES Registration statement should match
LOD shown on plans.
32. SWM and ESC plans may not include site plan. Remove site plan sheets from SWM /ESC plans. A site
plan (Amendment) cannot be approved as part of SWM /ESC Plans.
Please let me know if you would like a VSMP Application completeness checklist. Link to WPO /VSMP PERMrr
APPLICATION; form and content / items required [AC Code -§ 17 -401; p. 32 of .pdf / A. -J.]:
http: / /www. albemarle .orgLupload /ima,ges/Fonns Center /Departments /County Attorney /Forms /Albemarle County _C
ode Ch17 Water Protection.pdf
Thank you-
John Anderson
ACCD - 434.296.5832 -ext. 3069
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
Detail, paved construction entrance with wash rack -link: Albemarle County Design Standards Manual
http: / /www.albemarle.or2/ department .asp ?department= cdd &relpa2e =4447
Pnvrrl ran etrnetinn Antranre Fn prncinn enntml nlanc
STONE 7O' FAIN,
CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS 3" SM -2A ASPHALT TOP
COURSE EXISTING
l 2% PPx/r�I r N-
6- wiK. 2'A BASE
P R ELL.
STOKE 70' MIN.
CONSTRUCTION ASPHALT PAVED
ACCESS 'd WASHRACK
EXISTING
2Y 7L PAVEMENT
12' MIN -�
Pp$ITIVE DRAINAGE
*MUST EIfTEND FULL WIDTH A TO SMIMO T
OF INGRE<5$ ANO EGRESS TRAPPING DEVICE
OPERATIDN
ELM
12' MIN, POSITK DRAINAGE
27 TD SEDIVENT
- TRAPPING FEVtCE
FILTER CLOTH -'
SECTION A —A
A uli7 Lu :bn Water tap of 1 urch it wt be nlA decd ;Wh a iiiiabiii a i itch W&ock
AtkitofE t,alve sflppbing a waAi hose with a di'mletel of 1 -5 iziches for adecltlate
coyi.�taut pres�tu•e. ��'axh ;sateT nmut be ca�niecl awa� f�o>.tL the enh airce to wt
al�aro�•ed utttlui� area to I cuinve se�lueSit. .� sedlRiel>If �+liall be �I'e�etltecl x'0111
entLmag ftnu diants. ditcIie,; or watereoilrm5.
RAYED WASH RACK
NO SCALE
File: SDP201400054 -MajSP Amend - Glenmore Grnd Storage Tank +Pump sta- 100314 -revl
. t.
� 1l
+ �P
P
- r
F�• J i1
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper Virginia 22701
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
October 3, 2014
Mr. Christopher Perez
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP - 2014 -00054 Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station and Water Main
Dear Mr. Perez:
We have reviewed the site plan for the Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station, and Water
Main project, with a revision date of September 12, 2014, as submitted by Michael Baker Jr., Inc.
and offer the following comments:
1. For additional protection of the PRV vault please provide reflective delineator posts at its
corners closest to the edge of pavement. Since the top of the vault will be exposed 6" it is felt
that the delineators will guide operators away from the vault during mowing or snow removal
operations.
VDOT has no additional concerns provided comment number one is addressed. If you need further
information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at (434)422 -9894.
Sincerely,
0.6 dr-
Shelly A. Plaster
Land Development Engineer
Culpeper District
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
® VJ
xm
GIRGINIP
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
9 -30 -14
Chip Votava, PE
Michael Baker Jr. Inc
272 Bendix Road, Suite 400
Virginia Beach, VA 23452
RE: SDP - 201400054 Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station, and Water Main Project —
Major Site Plan Amendment
Mr. Votava:
Your Major Amendment application has been reviewed. In front of each comment staff has provided
references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to
date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may
be found under "Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org.
In order for the amended site plan to be approved the following revisions are required:
1. [Comment] The project requires a Comprehenisve Plan Compliance review (CCP) by the
Planning Commission prior to final site plan approval. The revised Site Plan is anticipated to be
used for this review and taken to the Planning Commission as an exhibit. Prior to scheduling the
CCP please revise the plan to meet the following comments. Rev 1. Comment still valid.
Claudette Grant is the Planner working this item through the Planning Commission. If you
have questions about when this is to go to the PC please contact her at: 434.296.5832 ext
3250 or egrant(iDalbemarle.ora
2. [32.5.2(a)] Setbacks. On the cover sheet of the plan assure that the setbacks for the water tank are
listed as 1 to 1 based on the height of the tower. As proposed the site requires two special
exceptions both to reduce the required setbacks to property lines (rear and side). A request has
been submitted and is being processed. Prior to final site plan approval the special exceptions
should be listed on the cover sheet of the site plan to include their approval date.
Rev 1. Comment partially addressed with the note on sheet 1, once the special exceptions
are approved, the plan shall be revised to assure the BOS approval date of the special
exceptions are provided on the plan, also provide the approved setbacks on the plan and
any conditions associated with it. Staff plans to take the special exceptions to the BOS at their
December meeting due to the CCP's schedule.
3. �Comm,,wnl It doi) s not ti ?�7c'ar 11.111' <9Sr of 1?.t. re%!.it U,, ;. y f{ )�;.i "t,Vii d i[' PYi OTT the .:'i:M :'St'ii:[:IO-ll f`�iM
)P" 1'if: =tis1y xi.ppr<'l-ed oil tile Fii't' "st ".1fl )it Site '11"m vs'T1it; 'i. are ilot €is'.edei f{1i' tt.ccct : s to till [)r:gx)se
storage. foci _ t3', ")lcasse „?rtl4' 't lcall oin tmd stl due t x e'.m., `c1sswe i'bcy arc, still . cgibl ',
<1e t11 "C Gi i1E)1: l prv)v(dEe d. oii (lie tll X71' i'1 €:3t?a. app r €?v,Cdi items w1J;0b slaies:
prello?,sh", ao1')`(:ed zit SDI'1 99.-1 ,nn i R)R .'i 0, 2000 wtd 110R -!'2 dan.,V Feb,uory
Akq Jaw on awe the Eroin 4 2. a 144 16 wvovxW,,,, dcc`,a <es U-v tdp,' M., itu,
tiuvelway behind be bu Odin " i� dicipicie(L labeled mid NEW Y& hipinnaiwnis rphich ifer-e
qfL12R W are Ulm( my Qs , r ed on dw Qvi Rev
1=511ah 3211,M (Anowl hyrmsbir Provide a sequou" 'heei. VVIIi"Ji depicils e."Js"ing
conditkmi�, oftho
Rev 1. Conanaea; Kdrusmed,
I jComumpt] On Oicer 1, und-er thoi itk,,,of4io sitz, plan is, whai qTews M he an AC SA prtjm
nwnben'pn numb, 201140'° Wev, Wunubry 11veklmidn (0, 111% UHULK
Im,"em nturiters, A a"Ad unhision, ehhen wnit theruii-nher -eridrely or :zpecify thai, it's ml
Irclect rumnberarkd ais,,�: provide dic, CIL) prok"Ct rnin.]:bcr� tc llhan
Rev I.
miriviltly tbc title of be S& 11an i '-,,3knnmwe (Round Wrap Wk. Pump
Slation, aixl %%!,awr ho,"cncn the Gle WWI alsorcfcreitcc ffib' ox-jsting, "E"Ist
R Waium Fhv WNT. Rev ke, il z: f"'-nu, n ern ad'P'd
7. fqAp1'nW0a Chi sheet (,ounty '.?crvicc Antl-,ori,ty i's
asswe ads Rou W isomed Wh "AMums'e As ldv,.,site is
hiking pdxwo.i6n. Alboo.i-arlo Couwy Rev 1. Coma went add resse&
8. (,e!ienfl fqh3pnxion. On Sbeet under Exi. dng Us'e, Wacer Storw,,.ye 1 rm ik and l'unip
Station is Ustod; hovvev ,,r th.e ir1; ` iaoioo isi.l. oon. the proper(y, AdId °Fi, o Station' use to
exi�dncg i.ises, JE-U-v 1.
Ch ()l') ifi.e plan pr",wid, t1w. zoajog. dis-iricts r, W the nsos ofabuiting
pulmrGs. Rev 1. Commaeol env Jldrvs5v&
10. F32,,,➢,2(a)l On Me plan pmvitic dw pwrd she (acreage). Rev 1. Commwent nddressK
11. �i.32.5.2(a)j ZnfiiF' , This popenly is N6ghbo'd-mo'd moclel ;NWE)), ANo, Me
Imoper, is sulycot to proll tbxs cissoc jaw whi) ali an zi
Cod'e- of E)eVelopinerit, Assm-re fliis inforlu"Ition is noied on die. pian"S co, er sheet,
Rev 1. Quanicat suld rvssed,
12. Provide the pavemeni 1l iddi IS both enbram'ts to die site �mld their associaaed
accesswayshravelways. RQ-v C:umunrnent
13. I)i Inensixon rill travol %- ays bein,, und by Me We propoisd i,iseand provide direct Ka I
ONDWS to signhy VaMc Mow dirongkokil thesite, Also, km pag 8 the ed 2W iflg.IOss,,md
egress easn .ill cal is in an area stere Am qMmwed. travedwayv,-ah 2-F wide, travelway sdil
24- �Yide? R�,,-�! 11, Connnme"�, -ndktres�;,,m.L
15. 1,32-5,- 1 Pro -side the rna�.,in nre,)ge oectipied 1by each 11.
Itie prop .",,ed Strocinros' squaro footage ,,,s well as the overall squ=,,
foola, e for the site, Re,v A. (CoLnunevit
17 1, s r'C77�IFr' "';r<€ , °r'i3S'i i::. tii I3:3 "( €�3 .r...?w� ? I'a'. k _% : . t13 `>if;z�l ilhe ll.£: �:�lall.
w
18 ._x._.., a w< F i.;i'i Tai i i ir:.i': '3t'£31-i it: 1. llti£` €I11x11,Ii'•i- .; i;£3 ?1 =i.iW illw >it. ti£a A €, c) iYii[ >ziG
[ r
n`�
19. <,. >x.. psa,t i%ii: 1, iC 11.i..ali:i €4t1;t titii ;i1( £i1 t)1z 1' €')pt wd
Ik,
20 . m,,q') pai °w£,' l <fll 1 a 0-iJ,. 'fflvolved ill Ine,
i! "1;�£3Sil+ ili Ikyki`:£.:. 5" xt:._
21. ,� H), , » < �a ��l£l':'d dv hf3ini crw o it "t €Y:'.•f i'313� 3 Re -v
22. 'X3 s:,' xJ. /Z,tJ j T3L� 7 iPi4;.. Provide 111 orina'ia£?ii t"L;gardzt1 „ }� <2 Ic. ms UA U -pri7 £?�£ £ li:se
li "I ti( i11 i "i €;ii mu c) is xLt €iiY`> £ (i) ¥` i ^'i i £3 "1 €;> %f, t€ . i- iar�,C s':ts`(eit? ' l � it? 1.-) i,aili, d, i?
SGi,x �t3i< ,u., eo9 .t[ow 0 ifl €3' F €.niished Flit as to ho %t fie t -No i. €sts v, :oIai£. to
£lm:£ € (z is %£? ,31 . 1.i.1= PW� 'MJEI? Zl „ i” z .T1 . See -1-1.2, ; o/ Ird > .ilt 's'itfd 'I:.' (,. oZZ n od,�,; for c' g,`h'vJ, ion of
P6!
23 „amp;,.,;, iro ide d1o" t €rl- 'JIman zInl i lfl '01,
) ia1pCiVi<)i,ls Cover € ?t2 th . 'tc-
24. [32.5.2(d)] Show /label areas of the site with managed and /or preserved steep slopes.
Rev 1. Comment partially addressed. On sheet 2 the legends lists "managed and/or preserved
steep slopes"; however, there are no preserved slopes onsite. Revise the note on sheet 2 to
only state "managed slopes ".
ti.. , " 1u d fl, -ka e Sanjl i tb ai£; Slii.e1.)J" £4 :1 x z 1 iS iE25 a2
26. [32.5.2a,k,l)] Verify that the location(s) of all existing or proposed utilities and utility easements
including water, sewer, drainage, telephone, cable, electric and gas are shown on the plan. Label
any existing easements with the Deed Book and Page Number. Rev 1. Comment partially
addressed, once the proposed offsite easements are recorded please revise the plan to
provide the DB page information.
27 1.i1 . `suldscap PI, (t,
s`o i t, :.ha no ,,i s`.inih)c -. loc at.t, m,, Re
28. g » oQ 0.. }£'.l %.$1"t£T Provide. fl .),Q of all jpro£ os —li; iI"t`i ?I`ov>Yt"1' exits.
29. [Comment] As proposed off -site easements are required, easement plats must be submitted,
reviewed, approved and recorded prior to Site Plan approval. Deed Book and Page reference
information of each recorded easement shall be listed on the site plan. Specifically for:
"Proposed 20' Permanent Easement ", "Proposed Variable Width Permanent Easement
"Proposed 10' Temporary Easement" , and "Proposed 20' Landscaping Easement" on TMP
093A1- 00 -00- 00400. Please submit easement plat(s) to the County to facilitate these items. Also,
for the landscape easement provide a maintenance agreement which shall be reviewed /approved
by the County Attorney and will be set to record with the plat. Rev 1. Comment partially
addressed, once the proposed offsite easements are submitted, reviewed, and recorded
please revise the plan to provide the DB page information.
Also, 01^0"'11" 14"W'k or t.'ft,Srsmed'P , ore raAin6g� '%7tFL; %; on 714P 0 µ9.`,e9- €Jlj- 00- (j25L ?0. ivhk A la t 'i' =%siti'd bV
3
?�i�I3��, � t, ft% %� . %.s.iS f �i �. , :JX�. ;£. £�, iIF:.Fi : �,.1., fis;,'�.. �....t f �;. . .'��.�•• £ ti.i £�:� � ..s£.....Y � <i....�:x
30 ihis €� J.)(A ''an
i3 } ` �.� F' ,. _ £ ;'
c, 9.. .' ,W, r2.� _t �s �3�:$,r£ia� tfo; t -" { -s
31 . fli
tanl. [Iu di' €� , t? x ri�$It1tt �; €.:Eifft f,,....> 1:: _ .yi.i. `<� �zlll 4 �'Fs1.=i� £i'sis( €n'Hy�:
1e =.; ;< li? 3 a'€ ltt.?S? ' E P11 :ti I, C;tt> 3t ,2 M ai` -0'� WC ,5,: t- .: Et `. G.i; ?It, i ;'1£ ;:;€ P%ri i id- 1),
"
fi ?)z i i0£ «"S 1?�
!x! *•_ in i, -,w . fli c, Ac �(gcc j.,m _l 3' . >„ �,..s ?'. a l' z (�.s ;w'> rr- € }i o :.t .... -in lh,° sib ' 131.m
w
p'L?'sl d€:d
add i ?i iTi is.) Ei w'1, fl'1t t aI'a not io 3-. 'p ovj,l� \d,. wylil t.?1,';.l.i .1"roln flie s. oel . n.do� M.
Gt "s`�S 1E ='r`i 73 °it €. I °z`,.1lt.L;.I1�3�`I` €`s`,ct'i;.` `?� ; ?i.1 °E��il•' it��.?', .'w'. _. �.�n..,:�a ,�,:�m�: aro�<,.� '.'�;'ar;s
32 . °
;.';'e� ��„„� , a�� �''s "F�SiG:? zEs�;i.lig1s;s to 1s, dcdtc,:i�;t�. =. a3 pabllz, ii?,; ui]' iw e�i,yca3a;tts if?I' f<' €[1itloS
,
33. [32.5.2e, 32.5.2p, 32.6.2(j)], 32.7.9.41 Landscape plan. A landscape plan that complies with
section 32.7.9 is required prior to the Major Site Plan Amendment approval. The landscape plan
shall verify that the site satisfies the minimum landscaping and screening requirements of Section
32. See comments below. Rev 1. Comment acknowledged. See the following comments.
34. [32.6.20) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.71 Screening. Existing trees may be preserved in lieu of planting
new plant materials in order to satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements of section
32.7.9 subject to the agent's approval. Specifically some of the existing trees within the proposed
20' landscaping easement are between 20' - 80' tall and have a mix of deciduous and evergreen
trees present. Please verify the above on the site plan on the existing conditions page and
landscape plan. Upon verification, it may be appropriate for the existing trees to be preserved as
undisturbed buffer area, as mature trees will provide superior screening of the tower from day
one. If the existing mature trees within the 20' landscape easement are determined by the Agent
to be adequate to screen the facility the following shall be followed:
The landscape elan should show the trees to be preserved, the limits of clearing, the location and
type of protective fencing, grade changes requiring tree wells or walls, and trenching or tunneling
proposed beyond the limits of clearing. In addition, the applicant shall sign a conservation
checklist approved by the agent to insure that the specified trees will be protected during
construction. Except as otherwise expressly approved by the agent in a particular case, such
checklist shall conform to specifications contained in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook, pp 111 -284 through 111 -297, and as hereafter amended. This checklist must be signed,
dated and included on the plans.
Rev 1. The existing mature trees are adequate for screening purposes and shall be
preserved in the off site 20 foot landscape easement area for screening purposes. Due to the
planned grading of the adjacent lot, this site plan shall provide a note on the landscape plan
that states, "If the existing preserved trees within the 20 foot off site landscape easement are
cut down or die, the easement holder (ACSA) shall be required to revise the site plan to plant
the required screening per section 32.7.9.7 of the Albemarle County Ordinance."
Also, it is advisable that the existing preserved trees canopy's be depicted more accurately
on the site plan. This modification will help the Board of Supervisors see the true amount of
screening when considering the special exception request.
4
35. [32.6.20) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7(d)] Minimum depth and spacing requirements for a planting
strip or existing vegetation. If only a planting strip or existing vegetation is provided as
screening, the planting strip or the existing vegetation shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in
depth. If a planting strip is provided, the plant materials shall consist of a double staggered row
of evergreen trees planted fifteen (15) feet on center, or a double staggered row of evergreen
shrubs planted ten (10) feet on center, or an alternative vegetative screening approved by the
agent.
To meet the above requirement the landscape plan shall be revised as follows:
Within the side yard, replace all the `Nellie Stevens Holly' with evergreen trees, it may be
appropriate to continue utilizing `leyland cypress' in place of the `Nellie Stevens Holly' or
the applicant may choose to utilize some other approved evergreen tree. Revise to assure
double staggered row of evergreen trees planted 15' on center. Also, assure that this planting
strip is a minimum of 20' deep, currently its only 14' deep. Also continue the planting strip
another 25 feet to the other side of the `Altitude and Pressure Sustaining Valve Vault
Assembly' to completely screen the tower from the road. Revise.
Rev 1. Comment addressed, staff can approve the Leyland Cypress plantings as
depicted; however, per discussions with Elaine Echols and Ellie Ray (Landscape
Architect) they recommend that the double staggered row of Leyland Cypress be
replaced with a mix of (Pinus Strobus Eastern White Pine) and (Cryptomeria japonica
& cvs), at a min of 4 foot tall at time of planting. This is being recommended as
Leyland's are knownrto fall down due to wind and are known to sustain substantial
damage due to ice. Also the mix of the two evergreen tree types is being recommended
to aid in the appearance of a more natural look. Staff expects that the suggested
plantings are expected to be looked upon more favorably by the BOS during
consideration of the special exception than the Leyland Cypress. Please advise staff how
you wish to proceed. Revise if appropriate.
Within the proposed. 20° landsca e ea:sc:t ae;rit. if the existing 'trees are determined not to be
adequate or the applicant is unable to preserve them and .ins'te €ad goes vvith ne,N plantings
assure the followin is 11-jet. Provide another row o ivergreen tree in addition to the row
depicte d to meet the mirlirritim screening; it may be appropriate to continue uitifizif.)g `leyland
cylar€;ss° in th.e second row or the applicant .may choose to utilize soi.nt other approved
everareen tree. R.e:d-ise't:o assi.ire dol.ible staggered row o'.f'evergreen trees l)laa:nte€1 15' on
center-, ev 1. Comment not applicable as existing mature trees are .ade€ Wde.
36. [32.6.20) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7(d)] Screening. The proposal includes a detention pond towards
the southernmost boundary of the property. This feature is required to be screened from
residentially zoned parcels per 32.7.9(a)3. Also, with the proposal, clearing is taking place to the
property line adjacent to residentially zoned land, this clearing causes the parking lot to be visable
from the residentially zoned land. For both of these items provide screening which meets the
requirements of 32.7.9.7.
Rev 1. The minimum depth for existing vegetation, if only a planting strip or existing
vegetation is provided as screening is 20' deep. In order to meet the requirements of the
ordinance the applicant can either provide 20' deep area of existing vegitation, or provide
the 10 feet of existing vegitation as depicted and then add .a 41— 6' tall slightly opac wall or
fence to this area.
37. [32.5.2(n), 32.6.2(k) & 4.17] Lighting. Is any outdoor lighting proposed with the site plan? If so,
all lighting (including building mounted fixtures) must be shown on a lighting plan that includes a
photometric plan, luminaire schedule and cut sheets for each proposed fixture.
Rev 1. Comment partially addressed.
On the lighting plan provide the tilt of the fixture, which must be 0 for full cutoff.
Also, on the plan provide the required lighting note: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with
a lamp that emits 3, 000 or more lumins shall be a full cutoff luminare and shall be arranged or
shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads.
The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural
areas zoning districts shall not excee on half footcandle. "
Also, on the plan provide the light's maintenance factor, which must =1.0 (also known as a
light loss factor of 1.0)
38 :% .s ,m %� xil s;,- islill?s are :stl ,T:i_t c' I Pi'i' Jdc t: f idc ,vi(i (Ics :t pfifall
tl )1I24.?.t£i iii t'it3 .; iE.S.t2.1i-. R- _P r it
39. ;l. lI : `t)i "4 T li l'1'Iif' �51`t? ti[i'1)I's
._?,_ s>i <€ ti l of dl- 1 .,i. f € . U z �ti ;' i` i' ?£IIx
to "I.I €..111_k_ of l t ,.�.,Ixl f mll � l pila ? 1t.; r��7 a >. �,.; a1 €d ffic ro- q.' =It°€,l'icraa I'_ i.1.Tt : x (;) T.i2el <l£lI cLtt: i° ��.1
'late o this Ielts'r tlle shai be t "', Sii1e �(flnlltaril : v tffidiavvv i t>?;''i.
L'%�a',JS,)�w'•l, .`r, a .... ;::: sl �xva.t. : aw' Sri ,•exi xw��c
NEW COMMENT
40. [Comment] Does the applicant plan on installing a permanent security fence on the property of
the new facility? If so, please depict and label it on the plan. If a fence is proposed staff suggests
that it be located as to not be visiable from the road and from adjacent property owners. For
example on the rear yard it should be located on the property line where the temporary protective
fencing is shown. And for the side yard the fence should be located in front of the double
staggered row of evergreen trees (closest to the tower). Also, if the fence is to be chain link, staff
suggests it be a green fence. A wooden board fence is preffered but not required.
41. [Comment] Once revised please submit 4 hard copies of the revised plan and an electronic PDF
copy of the plan for use by Claudette Grant during the CCP review by the Planning Commission.
If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me. Below I have provided
comments from the various Site Plan Committee (SRC) reviewers. Prior to final site plan approval
their comments shall have been adequately addressed.
Engineering — John Anderson
Comments pending
VD OT — Troy Austin
Comments pending
Christopher P. Perez
Senior Planner
COUNTY OF ALBEIVIARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
9 -3 -14
Chip Votava, PE
Michael Baker Jr. Inc
272 Bendix Road, Suite 400
Virginia Beach, VA 23452
RE: SDP - 201400054 Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station, and Water Main Project —
Major Site Plan Amendment
Mr. Votava:
Your Major Amendment application has been reviewed. In front of each comment staff has provided
references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to
date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may
be found under "Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org.
In order for the amended site plan to be approved the following revisions are required:
1. [Comment] The project requires a Comprehenisve Plan Compliance review (CCP) by the
Planning Commission prior to final site plan approval. The revised Site Plan is anticipated to be
used for this review and taken to the Planning Commission as an exhibit. Prior to scheduling the
CCP please revise the plan to meet the following comments.
2. [32.5.2(a)] Setbacks. On the cover sheet of the plan assure that the setbacks for the water tank are
listed as 1 to 1 based on the height of the tower. As proposed the site requires two special
exceptions both to reduce the required setbacks to property lines (rear and side). A request has
been submitted and is being processed. Prior to final site plan approval the special exceptions
should be listed on the cover sheet of the site plan to include their approval date.
3. [Comment] It does not appear that any of the previously approved items on the Fire Station Site
Plan (SDP92 -4 and LOR #1 and LOR #2) are being modified with this plan. Thus for all items
previously approved on the Fire Station Site Plan which are not needed for access to the proposed
storage tank facility, please gray them out and subdue them, assure they are still legible. Also
assure a note is provided on the the previously approved items which states: "Existing items
previously approved on SDP1992 -4 and LOR #1 dated July 20, 2000 and LOR #2 dated February
20, 2004 ".
Also, please assure the improvement from LOR # 2, a 14'x16' wooden deck at the edge of the
travelway behind the building, is depicted, labeled and subdued. The improvements which were
subject of LOR #1 are already depicted on the plan (lighting).
4. [32.5.2(a); 32.5.2(e)] General information. Provide a separate sheet which depicts the existing
conditions of the site. Specifically with regard to the existing trees onsite.
1
5. [Comment] On sheet 1, under the title of the site plan is what appears to be an ACSA project
number: `project number 2013 -04 "; however, Community Development (CD) also utilizes
project numbers, to avoid confusion, either omit the number entirely or specify that it's an ACSA
project number and also provide the CD project number: "SDP2014 -54 Major Site Plan
Amendment to SDP1992 -4 ".
6. [Comment] Also, currently the title of the site plan is "Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump
Station and Water Main Project "; however, the title should also reference the existing "East
Rivanna Fire Station ". Revise.
7. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On sheet 1, under Albemarle County Service Authority is
"Charlottevsille, VA" assure this item is replaced with "Albemarle County. " As the site plan is
taking place in Albemarle County.
8. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On sheet 1, under Existing Use, Water Storage Tank and Pump
Station is listed; however the Fire Station is also on the property. Add `Fire Station' use to
existing uses.
9. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On the plan provide the zoning districts and the uses of abutting
properties.
10. [32.5.2(a)] On the plan provide the parcel size (acreage).
11. [32.5.2(a)] Zoning. This property is zoned Neighborhood Model District (NMD). Also, the
property is subject to proffers associate with ZMA2001 -8 Rivanna Village at Glenmore and a
Code of Development. Assure this information is noted on the plan's cover sheet.
12. [32.5.2(1)] Provide the pavement width for both entrances to the site and their associated
accessways / travelways.
13. [32.6.2(i)] Dimension all travelways being used by the the proposd use and provide directional
arrows to signify traffic flow throughout the site. Also, on page 8 the proposed 20' ingress and
egress easement is in an area where the approved travelway was 24' wide. Is the travelway still
24' wide?
14. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the maximum amount of impervious cover proposed on the site.
15. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the maximum acreage occupied by each use.
16. [32.5.2(b)] Clearly list the. proposed structures' square footage as well as the overall square
footage for the site.
17. [32.6.2(h)] Signature panel. Provide a signature panel for all SRC reviewers to sign the site plan.
18. [Comment] On the site plan provide the information as to whether the site is served by public
water and sewer.
19. [32.5.2(b)] Information regarding proposed use. Provide the maximum height of all proposed
structures.
20. [32.5.2(a)] On sheet 1 under tax map parcel information assure all parcels involved in the
proposal are listed.
21. [32.5.2(a), 32.5.2(d)] Provide the source of topography.
2
22. [32.5.2(b), 4.12.7] Parking. Provide information regarding parking for the proposed use,
including how much is required for the proposed use. If shared parking is to be utilized, a shared
parking agreement shall be furnished and an explanation as to how the two uses would overlap to
accommodate the parking agreement. See 4.12.7 of the Albemarle County Code for explanation of
parking for unscheduled uses.
23. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the maximum amount of impervious cover on the site.
24. [32.5.2(d)] Show /label areas of the site with managed and /or preserved steep slopes.
25. [32.5.2(n)] Label blank areas around the water tank with the intended ground cover /surface
treatment.
26. [32.5.2(j,k,l)] Verify that the location(s) of all existing or proposed utilities and utility easements
including water, sewer, drainage, telephone, cable, electric and gas are shown on the plan. Label
any existing easements with the Deed Book and Page Number.
27. [32.6.2(j) & Comment] Please show utilities and associated easements on the landscape plan to
verify that no conflicts exist with planting locations.
28. [32.5.2(n)] Label and provide the dimensions of all proposed improvements.
29. [Comment] As proposed off -site easements are required, easement plats must be submitted,
reviewed, approved and recorded prior to Site Plan approval. Deed Book and Page reference
information of each recorded easement shall be listed on the site plan. Specifically for:
"Proposed 20' Permanent Easement", "Proposed Variable Width Permanent Easement",
"Proposed 10' Temporary Easement" , and "Proposed 20' Landscaping Easement" on TMP
093A1- 00 -00- 00400. Please submit easement plat(s) to the County to facilitate these items. Also,
for the landscape easement provide a maintenance agreement which shall be reviewed /approved
by the, County Attorney and will be set to record with the plat.
Also, if any work or easements are taking place on TAP 07900- 00- 00- 025B0, which is owned by
Robert and Carolyn Livengood, such easements shall be recorded as well.
30. [32.5.2 (lb)] Scale. Pages 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 all utilize a scale of 1" = 25% however, this is not an
acceptable scale. Please revise to provide an appropriate scale of either 1" = 20' or 1" = 40'.
Revise.
31. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. Throughout the plan there are notes which reference various
sheets for details to tank, pump, and altitude and pressure sustaining valve vault assembly (see
sheet 8); however, none of these sheets or details are provided in the site plan. Either provide the
sheets or omit the notes on sheet 8.
Also, in total the cover sheet lists 32 pages; however, only 14 pages are provided in the site plan
set. Please explain why these pages are omitted from the plan. If the pages are to be provided,
please add them to the set. If they are not to be provided, omit them from the sheet 1 index of
drawings and re- number pages appropriately.
32. [32.6.2(8)] All water facilities to be dedicated to public use and the easements for those facilities
shall be identified by a statement that the facilities are to be dedicated to the Albemarle County
Service Authority.
33. [32.5.2e, 32.5.2p, 32.6.20)], 32.7.9.41 Landscape plan. A landscape plan that complies with
section 32.7.9 is required prior to the Major Site Plan Amendment approval. The landscape plan
shall verify that the site satisfies the minimum landscaping and screening requirements of Section
32. See comments below.
34. [32.6.20) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7] Screening. Existing trees may be preserved in lieu of planting
new plant materials in order to satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements of section
32.7.9 subject to the agent's approval. Specifically some of the existing trees within the proposed
20' landscaping easement are between 20' - 80' tall and have a mix of deciduous and evergreen
trees present. Please verify the above on the site plan on the existing conditions page and
landscape plan. Upon verification, it may be appropriate for the existing trees to be preserved as
undisturbed buffer area, as mature trees will provide superior screening of the tower from day
one. If the existing mature trees within the 20' landscape easement are determined by the Agent
to be adequate to screen the facility the following shall be followed:
The landscape plan should show the trees to be preserved, the limits of clearing, the location and
type of protective. fencing, grade changes requiring tree wells or walls, and trenching or tunneling
proposed beyond the limits of clearing. In addition, the applicant shall sign a conservation
checklist approved by the agent to insure that the specified trees will be protected during
construction. Except as otherwise expressly approved by the agent in a particular case, such
checklist shall conform to specifications contained in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook, pp Ell-284 through 111I -297, and as hereafter amended. This checklist must be signed,
dated and included on the plans.
35. [32.6.2(j) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7(d)] Minimum depth and spacing requirements for a planting
strip or existing vegetation. If only a planting strip or existing vegetation is provided as
screening, the planting strip or the existing vegetation shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in
depth. If a planting strip is provided, the plant materials shall consist of a double staggered row
of evergreen trees planted fifteen (15) feet on center, or a double staggered row of evergreen
shrubs planted ten (10) feet on center, or an alternative vegetative screening approved by the
agent.
To meet the above requirement the landscape plan shall be revised as follows:
Within the side yard, replace all the `Nellie Stevens Holly' with evergreen trees, it may be
appropriate to continue utilizing `leyland cypress' in place of the `Nellie Stevens Holly' or
the applicant may choose to utilize some other approved evergreen tree. Revise to assure
double staggered row of evergreen trees planted 15' on center. Also, assure that this planting
strip is a minimum of 20' deep, currently its only 14' deep. Also continue the planting strip
another 25 feet to the other side of the `Altitude and Pressure Sustaining Valve Vault
Assembly' to completely screen the tower from the road. Revise.
Within the proposed 20' landscape easement, if the existing trees are determined not to be
adequate or the applicant is unable to preserve them and instead goes with new plantings
assure the following is met. Provide another row of evergreen tree in addition to the row
depicted to meet the minimum screening, it may be appropriate to continue utilizing `leyland
cypress' in the second row or the applicant may choose to utilize some other approved
evergreen tree. Revise to assure double staggered row of evergreen trees planted 15' on
center.
36. [32.6.20) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7(d)] Screening. The proposal includes a detention pond towards
the southernmost boundary of the property. This feature is required to be screened from
residentially zoned parcels per 32.7.9(a)3. Also, with the proposal, clearing is taking place to the
property line adjacent to residentially zoned land, this clearing causes the parking lot to be visable
from the residentially zoned land. For both of these items provide screening which meets the
requirements of 32.7.9.7.
37. [32.5.2(n), 32.6.2(k) & 4.171 Lighting. Is any outdoor lighting proposed with the site plan? If so,
all lighting (including building mounted fixtures) must be shown on a lighting plan that includes a
photometric plan, luminaire schedule and cut sheets for each proposed fixture.
38. [32.5.6(a)] When revisions are submitted, provide a date and description of revision specific to
submittal to the County.
39. In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails
to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the
date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the
developer.
If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me. Below I have provided
comments from the various Site Plan Committee (SRC) reviewers. Prior to final site plan approval
their comments shall have been adequately addressed.
Engineering — John Anderson
Comments attached dated 9 -3 -14.
VDOT — Troy Austin
See attached comment letter dated 8- 29 -14.
Building Inspections — Jay Schlothauer
1) No comments or conditions.
Fire and Rescue — Robbie Gilmer
1) No comments or conditions.
E911— Andrew Slack
1) Approved
ACSA
No comments provided as they are the applicant.
Sincerely,
Christopher P. Perez
Senior Planner
A �r
�y �'71iCiTi��P�
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: Glenmore Ground Stg. Tank, Pump Station & Water Main - Major
Plan preparer: Chip Votava, PE; Michael Baker, Jr. Inc [272 Bendix Road, Suite 400, Virginia
Beach, VA 23452 — cvotava@mbakerintl.com ]
Owner or rep.: Jeremy M. Lynn, PE; Albemarle County Service Authority, 168 Spotnap Road,
Charlottesville, VA 22911 [ ilypri@serviceauthoriiy.org ]
Plan received date: 31 July 2014
Date of comments: 3 September.2014
Reviewer: John Anderson
Planning Coordinator: Christopher Perez
Major Site Plan Amendment (SDP201400054)
(A site plan is a record of zoning compliance on the property. It should not include VSMP plans.)
Code Chapter 18 section 32, part of the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Title pg. —Label major roads on Location Map to help orient project.
2. Label existing parking, East Rivanna VFD, sheet 4 and across site plan sheets.
3. Revise Legend, sheet 2, to include SAF, TS, MU, and TP (VESCH symbols).
4. Show Managed Steep Slopes on TMP 79 -25A on sheets 4, 9. Ref. County GIS, Overlay District, and §8-
30.7.5.d. Re- establish existing grade; do not construct fill or cut slopes on Managed Steep Slopes (none
are proposed).
5. Provide pipe end wall and revised surface contours for proposed 42' L pipe, sheets 5/22, #19, below.
Covering exposed pipe (with riprap) is an unorthodox approach. Propose final contours that accommodate
pipe with end wall design. Eliminate need to partially embed, leaving exposed, 28 LF+ of 18 DIA
concrete pipe.
6. Sheet 5: It appears that Ex. pavement (VFD) will be cut to install two 18" DIA storm pipes (124', 42').
Furnish pavement cut, repair, depth details. Provide accompanying pavement notes.
7. If new easement is required between Glenmore Way (inbound /outbound) in the area north of Steamer Drive
(sheet 6), show proposed new temporary and permanent ACSA utility easements.
8. Sheet 7: Locate drain field on TMP 093A1 -00 -00 -00400 if drain field boundaries known.
9. Sheet 9/10: Confirm variable width permanent easement is proposed between bracketing, 20' wide
proposed permanent easements.
10. Edit notes, sheet 18, to remove reference to "Station X +XX," "Sheet XX," and "XX -inch culvert."
11. Sheet 18: Revise note to meet VAR10 inspection frequency requirements (VAR10, Part H, F.). Link:
hM: / /www deq viri inia goy /programs/ water/ stonnwatermanagement/ vsmppermits /constructionaeneralperm
it.aspx
12. Sheet 19: label Glenmore Way (cul -de -sac).
Comments below pertain to required VSMP application:
13. Submit VSMP Application, ref. §17 -401, 17 -402.
14. Label feature that appears to be a stone entrance, sheet 5. Feature does not appear to be a CE or generator
pad (S end of Ex. parking lot).
15. Sheet 7: provide CIP at Ex. 18" RCP storm drain, Inv. 388.80, sta. +48, after 12" water line installation is
complete.
16. Confirm that project limits of disturbance =1.497 Ac (total Area of Disturbance across all plan sheets. Ref.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
sheet 18, Existing Site Conditions).
17. Provide orange safety fence (SAF) between project limits and areas accessible to the public: Fire Station,
Glenmore Way (including cul -de -sac), and Steamer Drive, per detail, sheet 20.
18. Provide L x W for riprap outfall protection at 62'DIA, 35'H water tank, across plan sheets.
19. Provide L x W for revised riprap outfall protection at proposed 42'L @ 2.2% slope 18" DIA concrete storm
pipe (sheet 5, 22). —see #5, above
20. Show on -site stockpiles, if any.
21. Identify off -site stockpile, waste, or borrow areas.
22. Revise Management Strategy, Note 6, sheet 18, to reference plan authority authorization and approval
needed to remove ESC measures. See Sequence of Construction Note 10, sheet 23, as template.
23. Sheet 18: ACDSM General Construction Notes for ESC plans now number 1 -20; please replace 1 -22. Link:
bqp• / /www albemarle.orgidepartment .asp ?department --cdd &relpa eta _4447
24. ESC: Revise CE labels across plan sheets consistent with Project Narrative, Structural Practices Narrative.
Revise CE label to: temporary ap ved wash rack (PCE). —see sheet 18.
25. Replace or supplement CE detail, sheet 20, with paved wash rack detail, per ACDSM, below. —see #24
26. Sheet 22 appears to provide sufficient information to evaluate SWM plans against Virginia Runoff
Reduction Method Redevelopment Worksheet, but reserve comment on SWM plan not yet submitted.
27. Sheet 22: Show bioretention bed W x L dimensions in plan view: 13' x 26'.
28. Sheet 22: Provide 1.1 CFS 100 -yr storm event calculation /s.
29. Sheet 22: Specify frequency for 0.5' depth of water above the bioretention area.
30. Sheet 22: Provide sizing calculations or design summary for grass swales leading to bioretention bed.
31. Submit SWPPP for project, ref. §17 -405. LOD, item #16, VPDES Registration statement should match
LOD shown on plans.
32. SWM and ESC plans may not include site plan. Remove site plan sheets from SWM/ESC plans. A site
plan (Amendment) cannot be approved as part of SWM/ESC Plans.
Please let me know if you would like a VSMP Application completeness checklist. Link to WPO/VSW PExmrr
APPLICATION, form and content / items required [AC Code -§ 17 -401; p. 32 of .pdf / A. -J.]:
http• / /www albemarle ore/unload /images /Forms Center/Departments /County Attorney/Forms /Albemarle County C
ode Ch17 Water Protection.pdf
Thank you-
John Anderson
ACCD — 434.296.5832 —ext. 3069
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
Detail, paved construction entrance with wash rack —link: Albemarle County Design Standards Manual
htti)://www.albemarle.orL,/department.asp?dei)artment--edd&reipage--4447
.,Pav6d?constructii)n.entrAnce .:for- erosion wntrotolanS
-4 PGsrrivr-: wkm z
40 Smvl�w
WEND fULL w6tGl
RA 1XICE.
I
SECTION A
.PAVED: WASH. RACK
NP S�GALE
1:11e: SIXII-0140004-Ma S'P AnIc.-I'd-Glentnore ( rnd sta-( }9( 'j .1 13
A`
M1
h
°°
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1801 Oranga Road
Culpeper Virginia 12701
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
August 29, 2014
Mr. Christopher Perez
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP - 2014 -00054 GIenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station and Water Main
Dear Mr. Perez:
We have reviewed the site plan for the Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station, and
Water Main project dated July 2014 as submitted by Michael Baker Jr., Inc. and offer the
following comments:
1. Details for appurtenances that will be located within dedicated right -of -way need to be
included on the site plan. More specifically, the details for PRV vault and the air release
assembly need to be shown on the site plan.
2. The preference is that the wet -tap to the existing 16" DIP waterline in the cul -de -sac of
Glenmore Way be made in the shoulder rather than under the asphalt of the cul -de -sac.
3. A Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office for all construction activity
occurring within dedicated right -of -way. This permit should be obtained prior to
commencement of construction activity.
If you need additional information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(434) 422 -9782.
Sincerely,
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
;r' o
R e 4?
s r✓�s
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper Virginia 22701
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
August 29, 2014
Mr. Christopher Perez
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP -2014 -00054 GIenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station and Water Main
Dear Mr. Perez:
We have reviewed the site plan for the Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station, and
Water Main project dated July 2014 as submitted by Michael Baker Jr., Inc. and offer the
following comments:
1. Details for appurtenances that will be located within dedicated right -of -way need to be
included on the site plan. More specifically, the details for PRV vault and the air release
assembly need to be shown on the site plan.
2. The preference is that the wet -tap to the existing 16" DIP waterline in the cul -de -sac of
Glenmore Way be made in the shoulder rather than under the asphalt of the cul -de -sac.
3. A Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office for all construction activity
occurring within dedicated right -of -way. This permit should be obtained prior to
commencement of construction activity.
If you need additional information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(434) 422 -9782.
Sincerely,
Troy T stin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Culpeper District
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
�pF A
vt�r�1Q
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: Glenmore Ground Stg. Tank, Pump Station & Water Main - Major
Plan preparer: Chip Votava, PE; Michael Baker, Jr. Inc [272 Bendix Road, Suite 400, Virginia
Beach, VA 23452 — cvotava(a)mbakerintl.com ]
Owner or rep.: Jeremy M. Lynn, PE; Albemarle County Service Authority, 168 Spotnap Road,
Charlottesville, VA 22911 [ Llypngserviceauthori , .org ]
Plan received date: 31 July 2014
Date of comments: 3 September 2014
Reviewer: John Anderson
Planning Coordinator: Christopher Perez
Major Site Plan Amendment (SDP201400054)
(A site plan is a record of zoning compliance on the property. It should not include VSMP plans)
Code Chapter 18 section 32, part of the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Title pg. — Label major roads on Location Map to help orient project.
2. Label existing parking, East Rivanna VFD, sheet 4 and across site plan sheets.
3. Revise Legend, sheet 2, to include SAF, TS, MU, and TP (VESCH symbols).
4. Show Managed Steep Slopes on TMP 79 -25A on sheets 4, 9. Ref. County GIS, Overlay District, and §8-
30.7.5.d. —Re- establish existing grade; do not construct fill or cut slopes on Managed Steep Slopes (none
are proposed).
5. Provide pipe end wall and revised surface contours for proposed 42' L pipe, sheets 5/22, 419, below.
Covering exposed pipe (with riprap) is an unorthodox approach. Propose final contours that accommodate
pipe with end wall design. Eliminate need to partially embed, leaving exposed, 28 LFf of 18" DIA
concrete pipe.
6. Sheet 5: It appears that Ex. pavement (VFD) will be cut to install two 18" DIA storm pipes (124', 42').
Furnish pavement cut, repair, depth details. Provide accompanying pavement notes.
7. If new easement is required between Glenmore Way (inbound/outbound) in the area north of Steamer Drive
(sheet 6), show proposed new temporary and permanent ACSA utility easements.
8. Sheet 7: Locate drain field on TMP 093A1 -00 -00 -00400 if drain field boundaries known.
9. Sheet 9/10: Confirm variable width permanent easement is proposed between bracketing, 20' wide
proposed permanent easements.
10. Edit notes, sheet 18, to remove reference to "Station X +XX," "Sheet XX," and "XX -inch culvert."
11. Sheet 18: Revise note to meet VAR10 inspection frequency requirements (VAR10, Part II, F.). Link:
httD: / /www.dea.viri!inia. eov /Droizrams/ water/ stormwatermanaL,ement/ vsMDDermits /constructioneeneralDerm
it.aspx
12. Sheet 19: label Glenmore Way (cul -de -sac).
Comments below pertain to required VSMP application:
13. Submit VSMP Application, ref. §17 -401, 17 -402.
14. Label feature that appears to be a stone entrance, sheet 5. Feature does not appear to be a CE or generator
pad (S end of Ex. parking lot).
15. Sheet 7: provide CIP at Ex. 18" RCP storm drain, Inv. 388.80, sta. +48, after 12" water line installation is
complete.
16. Confirm that project limits of disturbance =1.497 Ac (total Area of Disturbance across all plan sheets. Ref.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
sheet 18, Existing Site Conditions).
17. Provide orange safety fence (SAF) between project limits and areas accessible to the public: Fire Station,
Glenmore Way (including cul -de -sac), and Steamer Drive, per detail, sheet 20.
18. Provide L x W for riprap outfall protection at 62'DIA, 35'H water tank, across plan sheets.
19. Provide L x W for revised riprap outfall protection at proposed 42'L @ 2.2% slope 18" DIA concrete storm
pipe (sheet 5, 22). —see #5, above
20. Show on -site stockpiles, if any.
21. Identify off -site stockpile, waste, or borrow areas.
22. Revise Management Strategy, Note 6, sheet 18, to reference plan authority authorization and approval
needed to remove ESC measures. See Sequence of Construction Note 10, sheet 23, as template.
23. Sheet 18: ACDSM General Construction Notes for ESC plans now number 1 -20; please replace 1 -22. Link:
http: / /www. albemarle. orWdepartment. asp ?department= cdd &relpafze =4447
24. ESC: Revise CE labels across plan sheets consistent with Project Narrative, Structural Practices Narrative.
Revise CE label to: temporary Raved wash rack (PCE). —see sheet 18.
25. Replace or supplement CE detail, sheet 20, with paved wash rack detail, per ACDSM, below. —see #24
26. Sheet 22 appears to provide sufficient information to evaluate SWM plans against Virginia Runoff
Reduction Method Redevelopment Worksheet, but reserve comment on SWM plan not yet submitted.
27. Sheet 22: Show bioretention bed W x L dimensions in plan view: 13' x 26'.
28. Sheet 22: Provide 1.1 CFS 100 -yr storm event calculations.
29. Sheet 22: Specify frequency for 0.5' depth of water above the bioretention area.
30. Sheet 22: Provide sizing calculations or design summary for grass swales leading to bioretention bed.
31. Submit SWPPP for project, ref. §17-405. LOD, item #16, VPDES Registration statement should match
LOD shown on plans.
32. SWM and ESC plans may not include site plan. Remove site plan sheets from SWM /ESC plans. A site
plan (Amendment) cannot be approved as part of SWM/ESC Plans.
Please let me know if you would like a VSMP Application completeness checklist. Link to WPO/VSMP PERmiT
APPLICATION; form and content / items required [AC Code -§ 17 -401; p. 32 of .pdf / A. -J]:
htW: / /www. albemarle .or,gLupload /images/Forms Center / Departments /Counly Attomey/Forms /Albemarle CouM C
ode Ch17 Water Protection.pdf
Thank you-
John Anderson
ACCD - 434.296.5832 -ext. 3069
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
Detail, paved construction entrance with wash rack -link: Albemarle County Design Standards Manual
http:// www .albemarle.or2 /department.asp ?department= cdd &relya2e =4447
Pnvrrl ran etrnetinn Antranre Fn prncinn enntrnl nlanQ
STONE 7O' FAIN,
CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS 3" SM -2A ASPHALT TOP
COURSE EXISTING
l 2% PPx/r�I r N-
6- wiK. 2'A BASE
P R ELL.
STOKE 70' MIN.
CONSTRUCTION ASPHALT PAVED
ACCESS 'd WASHRACK
EXISTING
2Y 7L PAVEMENT
12' MIN -�
Pp$ITIVE DRAINAGE
*MUST EIfTEND FULL WIDTH A TO SMIMO T
OF INGRE<5$ ANO EGRESS TRAPPING DEVICE
OP E RATIDN
ELM
12' )AIN. POSITK DRAINAGE
27 TD SEDIVENT
- TRAPPING FEVtCE
FILTER CLOTH -'
SECTION A —A
A uli7 Lu :bn Water tap of 1 utch it wt be hiAded ►silly a 11tu11iiiiixa i itch W&
AtkitofE halve sflppbing a waAi hose with a tliametei of 1 -5 iziches for adecltlate
coyi.�taut pres�iu•e. ��'axl>I ;s'atez- nmut be ca�niecl aw-a� f�o>.ti the enh airce to wt
al�aro�•ed utHtlUi� area t�� I cuint-e seiiilue5it. .� sedlRiel>If �+liall be �I'e�etlte[I x'0111
etntel ag gtonu &ants, ditcIie,; or watereoilrm5.
RAYED WASH RACK
NO SCALE
File: SDP201400054 -MajSP Amend - Glenmore Grnd Storage Tank +Pump sta- 090314.doc