Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200900009 Legacy Document 2009-06-17OF A1,& U 1 �'�RGINIA ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY Project Name: SDP 2009 -00009 Arden Staff: Gerald Gatobu, Principal Planner, Place: Critical slopes waiver, buffer Amy Pflaum Senior Engineer disturbance waiver and action on ,preliminary site plan. Planning Commission Public Hearing: Board of Supervisors Hearing: June 23, 2009 N/A Owners: Charlottesville Realty Corporation Applicant: Coleway Development, LLC Acreage: 19.03 , [11.35 acres for the R15 Rezone from: Not applicable portion] Special Use Permit for: Not applicable TMP: Tax Map 61, Parcel 124 By -right use: R15 Residential and EC, Location: Rio Road East [State Route #631j Entrance Corridor Overlay about 900 feet from the intersection of Rio Road East [State Route #631] and Seminole Trail State Route #291. Magisterial District: Rio Proffers /Conditions: No Requested # of Dwelling Units /Lots: N/A DA - X RA - Proposal: Request for preliminary site Comp. Plan Designation: Community plan approval for a 206 unit multifamily Service in Urban Area 2 residential apartment complex with a club house on the R15 residential zoned portion of Tax Map 61 Parcel 124 which consists of 11.35 acres. Associated waivers include section 4.2 (critical slopes) and section 21.7.c (disturbance of a buffer zone adjacent to a residential district Character of Property: Use of Surrounding Properties: The property is wooded and undeveloped. Multi - family Residential Homes, Albemarle Square Shopping Center, and Woodbrook Subdivision single family homes. Factors Favorable: See Report Factors Unfavorable: See Report Recommendations: Waiver of Section 4.2 — disturbance of critical slopes - Staff recommends approval of the critical slopes waiver. Waiver of Section 21.7.c - buffer zone adjacent to residential and rural area districts - Staff recommends approval of the buffer disturbance waiver. Preliminary Site Plan review: Staff recommends denial of the preliminary site plan. STAFF CONTACT: PLANNING COMMISSION: AGENDA TITLE: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: Gerald Gatobu; Amy Pflaum June 23, 2009 SDP 09- 00009: Arden Place Preliminary Site Plan Charlottesville Realty Corporation Coleway Development, LLC Request for preliminary site plan approval for a 206 unit multifamily residential apartment complex with a club house on the R15 residential zoned portion of Tax Map 61 Parcel 124 which consists of 11.35 acres. Associated waivers include section 4.2 (critical slopes) and section 21.7.c (disturbance of a buffer zone adjacent to a residential district) The property, described as Tax Map 61, Parcel 124 is 11.35 acres in size, Is located in the Rio magisterial district and is zoned R15 Residential and EC entrance corridor. (Attachment B) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Community Service in Urban Area 2. CHARACTER OF THE AREA: This property is located on Rio Road East (State Route #631), about 900 feet from the intersection of Rio Road East (State Route 63 1) and Seminole Trail (State Route 929). Currently, there is no active use of the subject property. The surrounding area is developed with commercial uses (Albemarle Square), affordable multifamily housing and the Woodbrook single family subdivision (Attachment B). STAFF COMMENT: CRITICAL SLOPES WAIVER The proposed facility will require the disturbance of critical slopes. A modification to allow critical slopes disturbance is necessary before the site plan can be approved by the Planning Commission. The request for a modification has been reviewed for both the Engineering and Planning aspects of the critical slopes regulations. Section 4.2.3.2 of the Zoning Ordinance restricts earth - disturbing activity on critical slopes, while Section 4.2.5(b) allows the Planning Commission to waive this restriction. The applicant has submitted a request and justification for the waiver [Attachment C], and staff has analyzed this request to address the provisions of the Ordinance. The critical slopes in the area of this request appear to be man-made. Staff has reviewed this waiver request with consideration for the concerns that are set forth in Section 4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, entitled "Critical Slopes." These concerns have been addressed directly through the analysis provided herein, which is presented in two parts, based on the Section of the Ordinance each pertains to. 2 Section 4.2.5(a) Review of the request by Current Development Enyineerinlz staff: Description of critical slope area and proposed disturbance: The request for a waiver to develop on areas of critical slope for grading incorporated with proposed development on TMP 61 -124 was received on 1 June 2009. The existing critical slopes and proposed grading are shown on the Preliminary Site Plan dated 1 June 2009. The critical slope areas within TMP 61 -124 contain both natural and presumably manmade critical slope areas. Total Project Area: Total Area of the Property: Project Area Total Project Area Critical Slopes (R -15 zoned land): Natural Slopes: 0.72 acres Presumed. Mau -made Slopes: 0.38 acres Total Project Area Critical Slope Impacts (R -15 zoned land): Natural Slopes Impacted: 0.25 acres Presumed Man -made Slopes Impacted: 0.38 acres Percentage Total Project Area Critical Slopes Impacted: 11.350 acres 19.03 acres 1.12 acres 0.63 acres 56.3% Disturbance to the slopes impacted in the construction of the roads from Putt Putt Place and the Woodbrook Subdivision stub -out to the development are exempt from the requirement of a waiver under Section 18- 4.2.6.c for accessways. The remainder of the critical slopes disturbance is for the construction of the Clubhouse and adjacent parking. This is in the area of the presumable manmade critical slopes. Below, each of the concerns of Zoning Ordinance section 18 -4.2 is addressed: "rapid and /or large scale movement of soil and rock ": The areas of critical slope disturbance are slim bands of what is presumed to be a fill area from the construction of the mall. Large scale movement of soil and rock is not anticipated to occur as a result of this construction. 2. "excessive stormwater run-off'.- Conceptual stormwater management, as shown on the preliminary site plan will be refined prior to Current Development engineering approval of the final site plan. Excessive stormwater run -off is not expected to occur. 3. "siltation of natural and man -made bodies of water": The applicant will submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan with the Final Site Plan which will be reviewed for County and State compliance. Proposed E &S measures are anticipated to reduce sediment -laden runoff from leaving the site. Inspection and bonding by the County will monitor maintenance of the erosion control facilities during construction. Proper stabilization and maintenance will achieve long term stability. 4. "loss of aesthetic resource ": The disturbance of the existing critical slopes with this development involves the removal of existing vegetation. 5. "septic effluent ": The existing subdivision is served by public sewer and there are no septic drainfields within the area of this disturbance. No portion of this site plan is located inside the 100 -year flood plain area according to FEMA Maps, dated 04 February 2005. Based on the above review, the applicant has satisfactorily addressed the technical criteria for the disturbance of critical slopes. Review of the request by Current Development Planning staff: Summary of review of mortification of Section 4.2: Section 4.2.5 establishes the review process and criteria for granting a waiver of Section 4.2.3. The preceding comments by staff address the provisions of Section 4.2.5(a). Staff has included the provisions of Section 4.2.5(b) here, along with staff comment on the various provisions. The commission may modify or waive any requirement of section 4.2 in a particular case upon finding that: 1. Strict application of the requirements of section 4.2 would not forward the purposes of this chapter or otherwise serve the public health, safety or welfare, or that alternatives proposed by the developer would satisfy the purposes of section 4.2 to at least an equivalent degree; or (Added 11- I5 -89) Strict application of the requirements of section 4.2 would require the relocating of the proposed pool house and adjacent parking. The applicant would have to redesign the apartment complex and change the proposed layout. This would not forward the purposes of this chapter or otherwise serve the public, health, safety, or welfare. There are no alternatives proposed by the developer that would satisfy the purposes of section 4.2 to at least an equivalent degree. 2. Due to its unusual size, topography, shape of the property, location of the property or other unusual conditions, excluding the proprietary interest of the developer, the requirements of section 4.2 would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property or would result in significant degradation of the site or adjacent properties. Such modification or waiver shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, to the orderly development of the area, or to adjacent properties, or be contrary to sound engineering practices; or (Added 11- 15 -89) Requirements of section 4.2 would not prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property. As indicated above, requirements of section 4.2 would force the applicant to redesign the apartment complex and change the proposed layout. Adjacent properties will not be impacted by the pool house; therefore, there shall be not detrimental effects to public health, safety, and welfare. Approving the waiver would not be detrimental to the orderly development of the area. 4 3. Granting such modification or waiver would serve a public purpose of greater import than would be served by strict application of section 4.2. (Added 11-15-89) Granting the waiver would serve a public purpose of greater import. Granting the waiver will allow the construction of an apartment complex on the Rl 5 portion of the property. However, the public purpose served (availability of market rate apartment units), needs to be weighed heavily against the traffic impacts generated at Rio Road (Route 63 1) and Putt Putt Place /Rio Hill Drive. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the critical slopes waiver. 21.7(c) buffer zone adjacent to residential and rural area Section 18- 21.7.c.1 provides that a 20' undisturbed buffer is required between commercial and residential uses, however, the Planning Commission may waive the prohibition of constriction activity, grading, or the clearing of vegetation in the buffer if the provisions of Section 21.7.c.1 are satisfied. [Section 21.7.c1 Buffer zone adjacent to residential and rural areas districts. No construction activity including grading or clearing of' vegetation shall occur closer than twenty (20) feet to any residential or rural areas district. Screening shall be provided as required in section 32.7.9. (Amended 9 -9 -92) [Section 21.7.c.11 Waiver by the commission. The commission may waiver the prohibition of construction activity, grading or the clearing of vegetation in the buffer in a particular case where the developer or subdivider demonstrates that grading or clearing is necessary or would result in an improved site design, provided that: (i) minimum screening requirements are met; and (ii) existing landscaping in excess of minimum requirements is restored. (Added 7- 10 -85) DISCUSSION The parcel adjacent to the area of disturbance is zoned C1 Commercial, therefore, a 20 foot undisturbed buffer is required between the C1 Commercial zoned property and the R15 zoned property. Staff has reviewed the buffer waiver request in light of Ordinance requirements: [Section 21.7.c.11 Waiver by the commission. The commission may waiver the prohibition of construction activity, grading or the clearing of vegetation in the buffer in a particular case where the developer or subdivider demonstrates that grading or clearing is necessary or would result in an improved site design, provided that: (i) minimum screening requirements are met; and (ii) existing landscaping in excess of minimum requirements is restored. (Added 7- 10 -85) 5 i.) Minimum screening requirements are met. The applicant in his waiver justification has expressed that the primary access road connecting the development with Putt Putt Place /Rio Hill Drive must cross through the commercial portion of the property to create a public street access for the residential portion of the property. The road is necessary and required, and cannot be routed through another location that would avoid disturbance of the commercial buffer area. The applicant has agreed to provide ample landscape screening to satisfy ordinance screening requirements. ii.) Existing landscaping in excess of minimum requirements is restored Architectural Review Board staff has reviewed the preliminary site plan and will be working with current development staff to make sure that the entire 50 foot buffer /setback is landscaped in excess of the minimum requirements. SUMMARY OF STAFF REVIEW: Staff review has resulted in favorable findings: Favorable factors: 1. The applicant has agreed to screen the buffer per the requirements of Section 32.7.9.8. 2. No alternative location exists for road access to the residential portion of Tax Map 61 and Parcel 124. Unfavorable factors: 1. None RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval of the 20 foot buffer disturbance waiver. Review of the Preliminary Site Plan: BACKGROUND: The preliminary site plan has been called up for planning commission review by the site plan and subdivision agent. The preliminary site plan has been reviewed by the Site Review Committee. Due to exacerbated traffic on existing streets [Putt Putt Place and Rio Hill Drive], as well as the anticipated additional volume of traffic that would be generated by this use, staff cannot recommend approval of this preliminary site plan. Staff s analysis of pertinent issues is as follows: 32.7.2.4 For a development of fifty (50) or more dwelling units, reasonably direct vehicular access shall be provided from all residential units to two (2) public street connections. The foregoing notwithstanding, the commission for any scale of residential development may require two (2) points of access to a public street where such access is deemed warranted due to the character of the residents of such development including but not limited to the elderly, handicapped and developmentally disabled. (Added 5 -1 -87) I The applicant has negotiated with the owners of Albemarle Square in an attempt to obtain access to and from the site via the shopping center traffic light at Albemarle Square. Those negotiations have been unsuccessful so a second point of access thru Albemarle Square is not possible at this time. However, the applicant has designed the travelways within Arden Place in such a way as to allow for a possible connection to Albemarle Square in the future. This design meets the requirements of a second point of access. The applicant has also provided access onto a public right of way adjacent to where Brookmere Road and Idle Wood Drive intersect in the Woodbrook Subdivision. The access point is a public street /right of way. This access point meets the requirement of providing a second point of access. Staff is recommending as a condition of approval that this access be limited to pedestrian, bicycle and emergency access only. Typically, staff would encourage vehicular access, however, if unrestricted vehicular access were provided it could present potential maintenance and safety issues. The travelways in Arden Place are privately maintained and have parking located on them. If the connection to Woodbrook was open for vehicular traffic it would allow the general public to use the travelways as if they were publicly maintained. The travelways are not eligible for public maintenance and are not designed to serve thru traf c. 32.7.2 SAFE AND CONVENIENT ACCESS; CIRCULATION; PEDESTRIAN WAYS; PARKING AND LOADING Each development shall be provided with safe and convenient ingress from and egress to one (1) or more public roads designed to: reduce or prevent congestion in the public streets; minimize conflict and friction with vehicular traffic on the public street and on -site; minimize conflict with pedestrian traffic; and provide continuous and unobstructed access for emergency purposes such as police, fire and rescue vehicles. To these ends, the commission or the agent in the review of a site plan may specify the number, type, location and design of access points to a public street together with such measures as may be deemed appropriate to insure adequate functioning of such access points. (Added 5 -1 -87) The applicant has submitted a traffic study that indicates significant delays in some turning movements. These delays are so long that it is staff's opinion that this development does not have convenient access to a public street. The extensive delays at Putt Putt Place may encourage drivers to attempt to enter traffic without sufficient space. This could lead to unsafe situations, therefore, staff's opinion is that the design, combined with the density of the site are such that this project does not satisfy the provisions of this section and therefore staff must recommend denial. Current Development Engineering Discussion of Arden Place Traffic Impacts The proposed Arden Place development met the minimum VDOT thresholds to require a Traffic Impact Analysis. The results of that analysis showed that this development will have significant impacts on the intersection of Rio Road and Putt -Putt Place, as well as impacts to the Rio Road /Rte 29 intersection. Per section 32.7.2.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, a multi- family development with 50 or more units must have two connection points to public streets. One of these connection points is proposed at Rio Road and Putt-Putt Place. Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis, the 206 unit development iA is anticipated to significantly increase the delay time of the southbound left turning movement from Putt Putt to Rio. This delay, however, does not result in a signal warrant at this intersection, and therefore VDOT will not allow the installation if a signal at this time. There are also impacts to already failing intersection movements at Rt. 29 and Rio Road. The most direct impact appears to be to the southbound lefts onto Rio, and the westbound rights onto Rt.29. The already - failing impacted movements are shown as red arrows on the Arden Connections Diagram below. Blue arrows indicate proposed and potential connection points which are discussed below. To meet the requirements of the ordinance a second connection point is proposed through the Woodbrook Subdivision to the north of Arden Place. A platted public right -of -way exists in this location, connecting the Arden Place property to the existing public streets within Woodbrook. The conceptual design of a travelway from Arden Place to this platted right -of -way appears to meet the standards of the ordinance for width and slope [per 18- 12.17.a]. The streets in Woodbrook are public streets, approved and maintained by VDOT. This connection will help alleviate impacts to the Rio /29 intersection by providing Arden Place residents the ability to reach northbound Rte 29 and the Woodbrook Elementary School without having to utilize Rio Road. It will not, however, provide relief for the left- turning movement from Putt-Putt Place to Rio Road. Also, it is possible that vehicles from outside of Arden Place (neighboring residential complexes and businesses, and even from Rio Road) may utilize this connection as a "cut - through" to access Rte 29 N. Residents in the Woodbrook Subdivision are concerned about the increase in traffic this connection could create within their neighborhood. An alternative to providing full vehicle access at this point and still satisfying Section 32.7.2.4 is to install a gate across the travelway, allowing pedestrians and bicycles, but vehicles only in an emergency situation. To further mitigate the traffic impacts to the Putt Putt/Rio intersection, the applicant has explored an additional connection point to the Albemarle Square shopping center. This would connect in the area near the old Circuit City building and provide access to Rio Road via the existing traffic signal shared by the mall's north access. The Traffic Impact Analysis shows that this connection will provide relief for the left turning movement from Putt-Putt Place onto Rio. It will also allow Arden Place residents to enter heavily travelled Rio Road at a signalized intersection. This connection will do little to mitigate effects at the Rio /29 intersection. Although, vehicles seeking State Route 29 North may choose to travel through the shopping center for such access, rather than utilizing Rio Road. This connection is desirable in that it will provide direct access for Arden Place and neighboring residential complexes to a shopping center, without the need to use Rio Road. In order to make the connection, permission must be granted by the owners of the Albemarle Square property. The applicant has been unable to reach an agreement with the property owner(s), therefore, the Albemarle Square connection is unavailable at this time. The applicant has proposed to build as much of the connection as is possible in the hopes that an agreement may be reached in the future. The connection at Albemarle Square should be made to reduce the delay time of the left turning movement from Putt Putt Place onto Rio Road and to allow Arden Place residents the ability to make the left turn onto Rio Road at a signalized intersection. The applicant has diligently pursued this connection with the Albemarle Square property owner, has designed it, and is prepared to construct as much of it as possible until an agreement for full construction can be reached. The Woodbrook connection allows vehicles to access 29 N without impacting the 29 /Rio intersection, but the Albemarle Square connection also has this potential. Current Development Engineering concludes that the connection at Albemarle Square, in addition to the Putt Putt Place and Rio Road intersection, best addresses the Arden Place development's traffic impacts realized in the Traffic Impact Analysis. The connection to Woodbrook should, at a minimum, accommodate pedestrians, bicycles and emergency vehicles. Arden Connections �«�•� -� £ASTBAOOK R ©•__ S a �q00 �. �OROy�O k R . 631 ? �P 4& r e Arden O j A `Pa 04+£ OY RFp���v n v o 2$' 2- 4 ti O011�SPC 652 A � 15.4.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Open space dedication to the County for a density increase For dedication of land to public use not otherwise required by law, density may be increased as follows: The acreage of the land dedicated and accepted shall be multiplied by twice the gross density standard level, and the resulting number of dwellings may be added to the site, provided that the density increase shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. The dedication shall be accepted by the board of supervisors prior to final approval. For provision of road improvements to secondary or primary roads not otherwise required by this ordinance or Chapter 14 of the Code of Albemarle, a density increase up to twenty (20) percent shall be granted, to be agreed upon by I the commission and the applicant, based upon the relative need for transportation improvements in the area. The need for such improvements shall be established by the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation. (Amended 8 -14- 85) Section 32.7.2.8 requires the provision ofpedestrian access. The applicant is providing this. The applicant is proposing that a public trail system be provided. This trail, along with the land surrounding it would be dedicated to public use. The trail is on the western side of the development and would link the residential development in the area to the commercial development in the area. The applicant is requesting that a density bonus be granted for this dedication. Generally, staff is supportive of the trail system and its location. However, as part of the dedication of the trail to public use the applicant is requesting increased density. Staff recommends that no density increase be given for the dedication of the trail. This recommendation is based on the prior comment by staff that the traffic generated by the proposed development will not allow for a safe and convenient access to the public street. The Planning Commission should, as a separate action, provide a recommendation to the Board. This recommendation will be presented to the Board when they consider accepting any dedication and approving any density increase. SUMMARY OF STAFF REVIEW: Staff recommends denial of the preliminary site plan. ATTACHMENTS: A. Site Plan B. Vicinity Map C. Applicant Justification Letters D. ARB conditions E. Critical Slopes for TMP 61 -124 F. VDOT Correspondence 10 ARDEN PLACE FORMERLY KNOWN AS RIO ROAD APARTMENTS GENERAL °T° PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SDP200900009 OWNER CWR4LOT'T5'JlLLE 0.FXh CORPORATION P.0 80%6340 CH1ilOTTE5V111E. V422956 DEVELOPER. COIEWANOMOPMEK, LLc 610 FRft" STREET C- LOTIESVCI.0 VA 22902 COMACT: MR. Af90Y M.- Z12 7112 EN.MEER: COWMS ENGlx,.K M EAST JEPFERSDn STREET CNARLOTTESYIIIE, vA 2X02 CaM'r.•n: NEL KOTT Cw 94391.))/9 TA%PMCEL • D B. 696, PG. 555 TOTAL A4EAGL. L9A60K, ZOITING GE,R'15 PROWEBD D E. U/IQNT A.DAFI.GE: 1I.3'.50 (A (R.IS IdM170Mf MtOAT,ED i6E. lIA11aAxlLY Ag[TiN11AJ (APARTN64T Lti71VLElf) CE *,Fr DEKETr. N ELzwf .15ONFTS /ACRE 00`0)3 f1He5NY •SA FgI.OFJxTExAMCl OF EMSnNG Wp•pgl AREA (S.IA ACRES) . Fs4A roa De�lcAR2BW QP uJ+EN rP.cE rora m3N'n• r2:n Aott51 . AFFOII[H4ILE lE1KF0G MNUS NALf � ADDIFIOHK L/Fn5 SHALL BF AFSWpHBLE • 2ALORB1N41!]OF5 [t\ DPfATN iMCFEASE] • 1 AFfORDApiE HrpT 15 CRyA.CIU: z (1.95 • 1.151 • 18.0 WMCPE 18A DIJ /O N, k L:.JSO K + 3 UU • 7!J6 W MAMNUn L00 TKO BEDROOM ARTS LQ TMCuon -nrrs ME GROSS RESK]EN DENSRY DF 15 OL11'Am WS 0F84 lmme 6ED BY 5Y FO0. THE MAINTENANCE OF ECST3NG WOOCED i A5 iQf. TO LD! pl: GREATER LIF THE SFTE. THE DENSfTY H0.5 ALSO BEEN INCREELSEO BY 15%f T DEDIGnLW DF 0EN PA{E'TO TE COLMtt, THE -MLIM. OWEW MG A M HAS BEEN TXCREA.4D 5T 2 W FOR THE YKORPOMTTW OF ! AFFO.9aABLF .- IN ORDER TO QLLLLIFY FOR AN, A_ W ,F-C -D AND A FLJtlLIr M4L -WORD -TED TO AIDEMAAIE -M. AS DEMOTED 1. THE DEDlCAn CA W RLOVICEA THE -ND TION OF P E JC i.YlD -A P4EI1C- 1TO.0- tEIXANiTY SW1. N W4 kREVIEW WITH THIS PRELMI -Y pJW. W000- PRESHl4AnON --MS SITE WOODED AREA IO.S6 AOiEs MINIMUM WOODED AREA PRESERVED (lOk): 1.06 ACRES RROPOSED WOODED AREA PRESERVED I T8 ACRES (Jc-) PROFOSED MAXMHJM LOT COVERAGE ,TMKRYA"U• COVER): 3/1 S STORY MILT FF Y RESIDEUTTK APARTMENT BUILDINGS • Y1,509 Sf (1.69 AC) CLDwNJU9E . 4 0J2 SF It 0 AC) (<ID' AND DEC9NG • 9 - 5` (0131 AC) '0A • 86,876 SF (1.99 K) PAGUMREQUIRED UL FAMILY UNITS 1 5 (SPACES / TW BEDA00•I BED : x B6 LONE B 1130 UNR•• 1.5 s D • L PACES 2 0 (SPACES / TWO OR NOW. BB00.00M UNTn X 110 frWO OR MORE BECRODM UMf^.• 2.0 K 110 0 SPA ES TO G FR REQUIRED • OT + 220 • (l SPCES vA4gxG PRO'+TQ9! 361 TOTAL SPACES (IFA.T.LgEE) HAfOlCAPPED SPACES PLUS 2 vM NCCESST6L F SRKES) TClOGRARl At- TOPoGPATiY CREATED FROM AERUL SURVEY PROVIOED B'r LMW - SURVEYS. INC Tyr 1 +`LAITY 1), 3099 SURVEY INFORMAnW vRONDW BY COMNONWFIITF CAI® sFR.VEnNG, LlL IM _ANUAA�)oe9. KNCHM NAIL IN PAVENENF IN PAAMNG LOTTO THE EAST OF SM, ELEVATION 506 793' DATUM ELEVA -ICns 6\SESI ON MO 83 D-N. FIQODMAIN MlORMRf1Pi THIS M:>PERT' IS LOCATED In ZONE X• AS SHOW Ok THE FL00D TNSVPANCE RATE MAP, MAP NUT9ER 51009CAi)BO EPFKTIYE DATE FEBRUARY 4, 2W 5 ANp FI NCO INSUMNCE RATE NAP MUN9E4 510030]2 W FFFECTNE DATE FEBRUARY 4 2]05 MfRE IS NO 100 YEAR FLOODMJJN A.SYf -- NTE. TH35 SITE, STREAM SUFFERS NO STREAM IR,TFREHS E-T ON SUBJECT PARCEL PEA Al- COUNTY GM. WATERSHED THIS 57E -NS TO THE SOLTIH FORK RIVANNA DRAINAGE WAY AND WATERSHED EXISTING VEGETATION -1. LOT WRH HARDWOOD TREES. ACCESS: PM'ATE ROAD ACCESSED FROM p M PLACE AND WOODBRO01( SUBDMSION, WITH FUTURE COMNER ON To ALBEMARLE SQUARE SHOPPING CEO ER CURB AND GUTTER FOR DRAINAGE 5EIBAIXS FROM FIRD 25 FEfT SIC'£ YARD 15 FEET, REAR YAR-0 FEET PARKING 10 FEET SIT.ICTUWE EKCEVURK. 35 IN HEIGHT SHKI BE SETBACK FROM ANY STREET RIGHT-QA WAY ANY OR 51M1G+- f -FFft lY RiSGDBlT1A1 OR AGRI']1LTRN DSTRIR N AODRION TO -M.- YARD REQUIREMENT$ A DM `4tl OF NOT - THAN 2 FEET FOR EACH I FOOT OF HFlHSHr TN FSC£55 OF 3s FEET. MAMMUM STRLKNRE HEIGNT- MINIMUM BUILDING SEVARk7 M M FM BEMEEN STR TIRES E[CERF THOSE SHARING A COMMON WALL RECREATION REQUIREMENT 2%UMTTS X 2W SF RF3i DN PERU • 41,200 EF RECREATION 5% G4DES SITE M- 1 959 AC X 0.05 X 43,5W SF /AC • 29,720 EF RLaLEATION AREA REWIRED 21,n0 Sf AREA DEO ID,567 SF OPEN S'ACE • B 06. SF CI LM-SE • 9,M1 P03L L OSEWNG • 27,%6 SF TYPE b RECREATION REQUIRED BY ENLMMAMQ TOT LOT ANC F• U BASKEFlA4LC TYPE OF RECREATION M10VIDE. GLIMCLBIE IIIIf]1101KG F - ls.^.`+4TER FKET1M65PACE, AND INDOOR PLAY AREA) POOL B DEC-Q, Ml LOT (IxO rOln<: WHIRL L1 x k MD SWINGS) AND PAYING PIED STE ARRAS: TION [xPERV AREA: s 199 ACPfS (.SINN) noX OPEN SPACE: 5 9M ACRES (2.1196) PEEN SLACE: 5 958 ACRES (52 Agg4) rWU Ww C1A55 ♦ TYPE 1 l0 RMENT. TRAILWAT SHA'1 BE RlOV10ED WAYS P0.0JER FOR CONNECT THIS TMROLQA THE DEVELOPHFM THE PUBICP WE0,N TRAILWAYIST, POSEDTOO THEECTTHIS RI.F- TO TO URMIM C1NEY,0.5 TO TH! NEST, AIBEMARLE CQR(TF PROPERTY TO THE NORTH, M`0 alo aoao ro THE sourH. CDNTRICi00. $HALL VF0.1Fr LOUnON MD EIE OM0F ALL MMRGROUND Lrt1LTTIES SHOWN ON PLANS IX ARRAS OF CONSTRUCTION P0.1W TO STAR -ING WORN GORTACT O1 BEk IMMEDIATELY IF LO TTON 0a ELEVATION LS DIFFEREI✓- FROM THAT SHOWN ON' THE MANS. IF THERE APPEARS TO BE A CDNFUU, AND UPON DISCOVERY OF ANY LTLRI' NOT SHOWN M THE PLANS, THERE WERE NO CEMETE0.1E5 FOUND DURING THE FIELD INVESTIGATION AHD SURVEY TOFO AND BOUNDARY ON THE FROPE0.h. CRTTICK SLOPES. CRRIOT SLOPE wA EL ES I N iFIR[UEO FM THE OUi1G1 SLOPE IMPACTS PROPOSED NERFIN. TOTK CARiC SLOPES ON SITE 1.12 K OM- STYE amid sIDPES INRACTEC" 0.6.3 Ac . ww of roTK on -STYE cATTxAL SLOPES OFF-STIE CRITICAL SLOPES RWACTED: 0.09 K Torsi UtRICAL SCOFFS DISr.RBm: 9.n Ac LIGHTING WILL BE PROPOSED 1. THE DEVELOPNEM WITH THE FINK STTE PLAN SUBMTTTAL SRE TRIP GENERATION AND L- USE M =1 3TH EDMON FOR MLOPOSED 2%DWEW NG UNITS' APARTMENT - - 306 DU AOT: RATE 1389 M (692 VPD ENTER/E92 VPD EXM, M PEUL. R4T£ 113 VPM (33 VPH ENFER/80 VM EMT), M PEAK: RATE I)8 VM (E1 VM ENTER/54 VM EXIT) Ci)tL'T'G EAHGMEERENG SHALL MDi NAVE AUNgRE)YOVFR CaNTR4CTDR5 WORM SARTY gPEGV/T1DNs, sb4EU]es, oa mMpuAxa wrrH0 ws AHD nays. wE SnAU WOr ASSUME nESVOnusrun wa AWruasTRUrnaN eE6vW ARJae r nAF+AAPRD -OV,I_ � 4• / �' ✓� ClAias'ES ALpN9 1]En' RIO MAGESTERIAL DISTRICT ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA q A K RNO Lifr l[R AS50• �, __ piE PF SG ►lA 2MF� J5E fAsWw, SqX iW TP'ARa -. 1. y '• �\' . PVa. Yfi I TE �� T •. F /N dl . l• � SrSCSN2}4L A.A,. IZt- � p i I / C A K RNO Lifr l[R AS50• �, __ piE PF SG ►lA 2MF� J5E fAsWw, SqX iW TP'ARa -. 1. y '• �\' . PVa. Yfi I TE �� T •. F /N dl �y� /' /Y� =.L - FOIlbt _ I[ L 1 1 p f _ IMF' Q616J -OD pG -•2k _ A/� J\ J l.x F g A,;I ! --1•� `T �i SHEET LAYOUT SCALE: 1" = 100' FEBRUARY 9, 2009 0 osc „c_,sz No a VICINITY MAP Z m SCALE: 1" = 1000' 0 K I`•-0 $ E uj 1•Ir. SHEET INDEX TIRE SHEET COVER SHEET I OPEN Sl CONDITIONS 8 BOUNDMr nDJtb MENT 2 OPEN SPACE DCOICAnoM EXH1Bn 3 s e PLAN GRADING AHD STORMwATER nPNAGEMEY• MAN 5 UTILITY MAN 6 -X, STARE ANKTSS LILT- q[bIHG PIAI' F CT Cl4YAllOn RUM TOTA, SHEETS 9 Attachment A 0 Lu Z ' r m L.L O1 N W� d' WN O Z N ul in r.� ZE W� Q U W. Ltl ZW N - z J° JlL Ll] O W 0 Cl U'o LLJ Ln Q EW H G Lu �I W J > LLJ O � U d LLJ U4 J Z LLJ LL Q g JOB NO 082023 SC E N/A SHEET NO . l• � SrSCSN2}4L A.A,. IZt- �y� /' /Y� =.L - FOIlbt _ I[ L 1 1 p f _ IMF' Q616J -OD pG -•2k _ A/� J\ J l.x F g A,;I ! --1•� `T �i SHEET LAYOUT SCALE: 1" = 100' FEBRUARY 9, 2009 0 osc „c_,sz No a VICINITY MAP Z m SCALE: 1" = 1000' 0 K I`•-0 $ E uj 1•Ir. SHEET INDEX TIRE SHEET COVER SHEET I OPEN Sl CONDITIONS 8 BOUNDMr nDJtb MENT 2 OPEN SPACE DCOICAnoM EXH1Bn 3 s e PLAN GRADING AHD STORMwATER nPNAGEMEY• MAN 5 UTILITY MAN 6 -X, STARE ANKTSS LILT- q[bIHG PIAI' F CT Cl4YAllOn RUM TOTA, SHEETS 9 Attachment A 0 Lu Z ' r m L.L O1 N W� d' WN O Z N ul in r.� ZE W� Q U W. Ltl ZW N - z J° JlL Ll] O W 0 Cl U'o LLJ Ln Q EW H G Lu �I W J > LLJ O � U d LLJ U4 J Z LLJ LL Q g JOB NO 082023 SC E N/A SHEET NO \ /� �\, 1Xp+'Y C%aiFF'fR,7W aci'HAC �JrOla?7lkYUCJBY PFO Nq;p 8Y LOLkSa AERIAi SURV-Y; WC (3.v JARUARY ]), 2W9: Vk1£Y - _ - \� . ...... �` � ew,raw�pyw paa+COdti er icwny /bF.r' nl LraYl .aN+rF7u�G L <r .w dwuaRr u7o-3. s• et4 .cwn I p-�,t IJF': IS IM ph,,a�.4�Ny�CR a+ C1x'S Syrc. PER u8E>✓�s[ CpJ� N as —' A E>USnvc zo ncsa "•` ,�. .� / Y ��_. \ h. i TuE1�E AF'C' AV' Icva�.-MY± WETS' LD,:,i 1ED ..K• IhYS 3F1E. PE@�EEfA �l.W /SIlC0.7C/J?l0J AI'q i31 +WJUV79D EF%FC m,t ljtf£ \ sAllf(,R-r M'R EACruEM1i TF{ytJAR'� J, '70."i`� -!..,� \ ~ D R 1 TC_' FIG'. � 1, COp" sx0°C Wa1�R1Mq'HE%�'1RS(ti�f0�/If(: C.,::..c�E:,-S .MOROSLH RCAEW � -►- �`G T � - - ��T�of c - > VA - •�z %�20 REAR - `� /� y,i /� • \ / \ /`• `�� ' - A�PRNX: LJf3L Pb 6 EIRSTM.^. \ - - .� �a�l- °x � 1 � ..� �' 1. .. • p•�VSnEasErd<+r I�,� \� � ''�`�'�/'��' %I f - (• ��� ' �� „ ='i, i ��'`��� ax �aN STCNan4eec annc•L ��E i � -�•>,+ _ _ ,.�� ?,� l r '" T/ l �� RQP°ENY SIME { Fy RwACiS F:JR Ali4'1I�1 UC IaOA,rv1-1 r' _ -- 43,25 Aw�� .� cn4Twc so w.T 1� /i n '1,5 90E SE TBncR • ��1I ! 1 vao�oseo vpocAc, �, Weis �I _ c s�ttE X10' Pagl[1 tJV'SE I6ACN y •.��4'f'- �"• ° �• 1 1 % c+RESER. iK�V AAE Wcaoct] q�e7 \ MAiTf'JNEV EFTwssnEif' EgSTING 2C acsa i / l r _ f.` I �= ` ` �; / .. r✓ - �.. _ _ - "�. , �~� ! � � t i w. u��� �. lr fk6TMG � lAEA OF MH.OVdC� FREE .WEI.S CC �fWUC RF S .NDAR SE URGRADLO ro -PIALL i1 'i l / _ �. I ' r ,ti-y ' V \ . `max •u 57nLTr sr MO.wos nus wcae.ux AfALL em 4t�� �sr•�ai2v�ur�oueC�saaeas. ql�c[ � 1' ]� , �� `°i i• — .. -_ - - -- — �!' V ��j"�yy�/a�/ 9� [a TO La0r ,u%11fin' m CNS PA 61+ch'f' pE%n4 R- RE- rtSY,W.� iE 01FFiC 11K��AYLM(4'r hfAr HC AIiCESS.I r'/p.,4•y!{1E' RC N. 77m -1 f5 51'JE r I1 L9 2-Z Raw vpo T b / '+PAI)035E9 ar Sre eA uwE r_�' { E ROAD W :'11� N W �? ILI (!) Q -9 do OF alias MWV � � � LD ZD p _ m w cr9 % F u _ .. _ I i � �s � /.'- f � //� �l � �-, .--�,• . �. � � sa�'e' Roan x�Dn4.r� U � Cy ?fir w ~- y N //✓ -- - L 1 i S z Z �� t-v: idIING� LI E k / Y z �. x V?4 arrenou r �� �j !/ O) W H . � w Lwc +a+ sua<rwsn. �, � � - - r �j T . c ,/ - - ` i - - - .new r irisluuti n o�imiEawA•r '.:r I r—J �„ Lu L Q € �� ;` �€ /� Aoc wov+ / �\ O �'L' ; 'o�c� ;.gym � A � / � ,- �� • i -, � -�. � �!*.�� j�� ��, S y� r C ,� � -� • � 1� � r.�j � �� � � �� 'YVF uWOiU�i £Fk 2a' RpAfl WIDIH "� } � om 7 -L �cnlnr.Al .'E.SEM r , � ` �`•r �� "'�f � �oazaz3 _ r /}'/ ►���_ �j�F.'� ;-35 S ROAD 'awT':�Ir �_ II ✓• lfr 1 f I` - �JI� �'MATCNLa SQPHSC 1 1ti,� ' `1 ! [ +rf SHEET rvO. tl z AW.ft NOTE- DEVELOPMENT PROPOSES 1.71 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY. THE PROPOSED TRAILWAY SHALL BE PUBLIC AND SHALL CONNECT TO CARMIKE CINEMAS TO THE WEST, ALBEMARLE COUNTY PROPERTY TO THE NORTH, AND RIO ROAD TO THE SOUTH. �- _ �r.�gwgere 1. THE APPLICANT WILL FINALIZE WITH ALBEMARLE COUNTY THE EXACT [� - - "�qi= _ '�ymm r:o 75791 a ACREAGE OF OPEN SPACE THAT WILL BE DEDICATED TO ALBEMARLE ��•�_ - / •+�-`� - -ro Ktesteamme�xrx'- 6/r �y. _AUE ace COUNTYAND THE AMOUNT OF BONUS DENSITY THAT WILL BE GRANTED TO TYPICAL CLASS A -TYPE' 1 TRAIL SUCTION �12 R/WJ THE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE OPEN SPACE DEDICATION, OP 'l�C!.ZM ECINEV�./: ~I�. �• !_!�� ��.. a� ���� TOTAL OPENtF'ACE DEDiCATiD TO THEfLOUNTY :171 ACRE5 '�-'� ;IO _ +�� I � ',; � j - F���v ' � .��..c . � r Gyy�d�y _ _ ' ✓ � LL vg M `�c� b f! ie\ � ; � - t�'y`"'���T �_�, � � '• - '� 11� � _ - \ � k_ � � iC Lam` wr Lu _ i '! � / / " �-.Y •�°' -yam'" _. � . �.a. �. \ - / �, %.\ � � \ �'j •w LOW MAINT E t i II PUBLIC ASPHAh7 114AY +j CLASSAT fa;LTYP,}i. LD i Y, � g S� POND Lu (n OPEN Q' ACE DEDICATION f1 - v -�`- ' 7 'i ' r. Lu ._ EAS,WENT Q , LINE(TIP .,y / \ �.� ✓ -� r Q Q L Qi Lij Lu Lu J 0 L13 _ 11 RAILWAY +1 :.� �` r'_ i�� J /, -.i`fI 00 . �. EASEMENT'(TYP.) €-. ,I I� t v8oacsEOrn+._w,.v , T , f RHO TOAD EAST _ � � �\ / 'Y•.. r. �� � /�:�� i � � /. C / ; I � •--�� IOB HON A. _ .,-�" \ /'Y - - ., W .�,,� '�i.• } :�� �. 082023 •� •-� 1"_40'] E *rare G', .•— — _ - / -� �•A 'I� �' _ I �.. �1 _ 1 sti 3 Ho. \ •' v / \ r \ - PROPDiED RETAIMNC �_ ,,�. •Z i '- :. MATCHLINE- SEETH15SHEET �T a O. WALL - OHT SEE . SHEET s•./ - i `F, AA��w* t AAAAAAAAAAAi Ar �F: rG� CONNECT ROAD TO FOR HFI+ NSIONS EXISTING IDLEWOOD DRIVE _ DS PROPOSED RETAWING �+I' _ - .. '� /� - cam.' R . LLi'iYZ WALL -SEE SHEET 5-- - _ FOR HEIGHT fT�EN90N5 � _ �n p0(O7 �-- _ j••.• Nt / / PROPOSED LROSSWAD( TYP t i . PROPOSED Y tONCRE'E PROPOSED DRIVEWAY_/ / / SIDEWALK TW f"•�� TO EJtISnNG LOT / / �r % /'' (, ) 2s (TMP ), I 4 r O ;t _ PROPOSED _PROPOSED CRETE 4-WAY STOP �•_1� - v \ /,�,� \wu' "� r I l ��� �PROPOsED VAR. W13TH PRIVATE /Y /p: %.V 1� A 55 EASEMENT �Vj/ t AA]MY 3 " . F r ,AS HALT 1 � ET WA / "�•✓ .Y / J' 9 STREET /. f O - . c c >i _ X ; u4:E +�- �,... , _:'."��' >.� z \ =�. - - -- - - /„ \� -� /' �I � . r i'� /� k �\� � J w O. I /... _ ;, ✓ FDR. Hpar+" oMExv�s , � � gJ 1 � III I /.�\ / �, y} � � � .\ __ - / // � � / .✓- _` /'... / /'wry 6. P _ � � J4. - /� > / ri, .- �/, /\ - F• ?� �l /1� / C�eiD / / �� j Y� j y - '/ -�i; "r .1.9� �.' R'+�/ e G\ .7. W • � 2 <.' ten. x' �' ' AOPOSm 1 f / / ` VV h o ��� �- i ' 00 < wN ✓. SP ,HALT ✓ � vI / _ 10, -- rtL TI,N _ ��+ Ti /- yrg�t -S C_ ., ✓ JJa C \ _ TER *"N - /. 1OkzD' IIUIIPSiER _ MATCHLNE.-S`THISSHEET -/ / _ A� - PAD AND ENCLOSL E/\ u { ' NALLR°P °SE°RESHEET 'WN" 5. ;r" _' c ANT PAR FOR HEIGHT DINENSIONS PROPOSED RENN1NG WALL SEE SHEET 5 L1._I' �� rn FOR HDG.T DM •- /.'./ .nu y ` - .�ij," / P" ' /. „ � , /' _. / Z, c - "(c PROPOSED CG-2 ITT PRCPOSYD 10'_. // - /JI _ ) � T r J ASPHN T TRAILWAY 1 • _ - - l PROPOW, l I _ � PROPOSED CONHEC� • $ / ' /� / { / / \ C 12 T'R ✓ / `TO RO HILL OFVELOPMA'T ry I �^ Lu ALK Lu �.A OTE C <ESS GATEMAY BE PROVIDED ON THE ROADWAYTO OODBROOKSUBDIVISION TO LIMIT ACCESS THROUGH THE w EIGHBORHOOD TO ARDEN PLACE RESIDENTS ONLY. Cl Lu 1 MATCHLINE z -SEE THIS SHEET 1 / W / / \ u/\ L _ �. • \ /�' / ^� j off/ \ \ PROPOSED w U f - PROPOSED HYAC ✓ : i •R^�C rC S CONCRETE Z . Y V V KGR.E..[ SIDEWALX ki _ I UNITS (TYP.) DUMPSTER W1 TH /� AREA, ' I I - '1'� � '107(20 DUIWSTER •' . /PAD ANO EMCLOSURE I _ D , % l.� _PROPOSED l I w f / PROPTNNMG - I\ WALL SEE SHEET 5�' / '- 1.. ?- . J i 'k -�� _ _ LW `L-1 d ppi f "OR HC CMS\ • _ _ ' ._ \ LL 'mil §7 r - ��yy�. PROPOSED O EST ON :11LTE- SL�$'AI.K �38' RIGHT -OF -WAY LLJ x {1 nLL51DE FOREST COURT- O t!R 10 PAR�.INC SEA&,.nCK _ - � ' / �'SG JG t<'F •, .r \ v �� PROPOSED RETAMtl116 { - 7- EHT DIM90N -SEE SHEET 5 - I. r HGEN5 / Y - / _ U �' l ✓ i/a ' i �' - ,i �— - — " STOP VAR. WDTH PRIVATE sTGN'¢ Q +p ACCESS EASEMENT` CORE CUT FOR „ F - - +� 24 +'T' /C • 1 + ' f3tOSSWALK ED ` -- FUTURE CONNECTION 'PROPOS (TW) I , P �PROPOSp OUNDMY: // ! I� -- �Qi]O�COMMFRCJAl, AREA � �L ` N x10 n0. f I LNE ADJUSTMENT -! \ -U: x Y AlY R ROAD'9IL BE UPG7C0 f9 VRBan PRO°Oi0 08202.3 �{ NEB PARCEL AREA I` / 'PG4'. S7RECT 5AM1eltDt ne5 I'+'C✓tALF SHA.i VAR wDnl_.: 1 1 .. "11.35 ACRES j \ II f i •: +'r n+c[cax'(CURa A. a1r,+FR. smnmkS rt w![:CS ACCESS 4 2 xl SULF 1 ) M Adr! rNC Igor srArrowans F*T cv eAN ;cc A_ - — - EASQAENT f��\ /'�r S1A`F'F' IN AU�Jrpe. As[+A{HT Crnt SwP:ES 1 -30 t 8F PROND(D f0. WD> ANS 6'EAf TO :1CrJRE DEPTYS ARE.ADEOUJI7E OML�ArAVG TMY - NOTE SEE SHEET 5 - MATCHLINE a -SEE THIS l - /' '/ _ - + ✓ -' -X -� -" /. y - JyAr 6F NCCC$.SARY n) ep1�YE' M �R.Y1MF.7 FOR SIG/iT DISTANCE A' . ` I " - DESTCIJ FOR Ac nice vFA iR v+e� No. �. ! Fs Amc. . Two-wAY nor INTERSECTION H 0 I. 1 01.1, 4A0E PLAT{` U BE 9�—rm WTH ME S�TE 94M ]N ACCORDM� A� �4�R WA III 01`141E,.�VATU W-ZCTION' Cnl=CE Y�-" 12 Or ME CODE Or ALWEWJ�;- z—7— %rLW-UM M� ML_ M I-E-IM Aft,MATTID Mfl� FK U� W�-PLTERS A,4G AS AT A - MWI"-Illl 1.11, 011� _�I,, THE 1�u rkj�nw Sp," L _ 'o. X C—; Q Ok G�STVA IdLL DETAIN kk�*KRRJR0 &Fl% alai 564H1 REmVxL T 1IR7 ll,�IL,. RAN m T�TA 5�;TOf.=� ON AT A ;MWOVAL o RAn Mrj S�� WU��_ L� QZ= \, AS" 01 SMW-M- WAK��WNT m—oE.AP.M. 2. Sc", 'TER �— 3:1 S..Ll- HAVE L01*4-7E4MCE GROLWO COVER. I UmNTEN-Cl ITROj.L; COWIR SHW, K "Aj &rL K� 4 IF TOTAL ARLA-1.23 AC S- AREA 3 P*�OSED Y ON- SITE -1.16 AC SITE-,0.07 AC TOTAL UPEPMOUS AREA ON-Vn.0,39 AC QW-STE.Q00 AC 4 VERT orE PL �-A -ROVOr W I Al-IR' j �LjT ARs--r 0 F st .-AGEOEMI O�..M—lTllLIlll ME Nat,: PROP09� QKCE u. z Z R"T , to Actf�,m c p -1 TORMWATM rA"noN (Fi 17 0� > Lu is .1 sw 'PORTION AREA A AC 2 'T.Ton=ln, TE A. AC Sl 5 11- I.—OUS AREA ) "ON -STE-59 AC 40*��IyOSED 81 TER TO AoCWGOATE STC*.—I Off-SITE -G.00 AC OcT.Nno. A Arr. W�jM EOR Sz ARE. x LID A//i, S- P.xo TV >/ LU_4 LU (D < 0j LD < V) LU 0 < LLJ a— 0 41 jEcTA)N iu Ul PROPO z Lu TOTAL 5NRFAM5.X8EAC cr� < T1 if O—STE-180 AC 0,7-SITE-1.18 &C V) TOTAL 11APERIOUS T ON -SITE -3.09 AC 0 -WE z FF� -0.55 AC Lu V) Ilk, SU7 - W1 FT - - I ......... LL) C) po -A 0 Ir Z� — otw —'? r — T ZT 082023 LE —.z rL.— .1 2 7/7 60 l \ Gear.f w.I <r A 6+NUrr Serer bin ,/�1 1 / ■y � _— J t � � �� —__ �� G —LINE SEETHISSHEET - - All waled a�edm.'o .1, wll..aE..a�sebw wvoo ollt Qmnd WarlmW — \1/^.77M' !� \ r• �� - rA r svr[m��moo�e3�yad��A)rs�reCann Smxe .v�o�m w]�JIS. - INNR, w�p a•..vlee ieln aawE bedmSp •LN VS _..— \�� •�Y„u.o. /// !.SAMITMCYf"'F S I�Z Nl ambrnw••w.h.a acwea ofwu..el.n n,�x MM>NN.ed ny RW5A wla.o me anal �/ \ utiµ Y•'-cx - 5 /�/ I �' U i;o 35795 a .u}. AprmawMms eWwee .mW RW SAMwpml Rmmemeee Mx..(�.anx _ .� I � '- \ -�� ij tleeo.PWar.+ML La mA+r ®><xmnfJx�. A1n.Jwy:l WnSEJ'N411 12� �� Ew$RND 1Y DLP -y s ! d CONNECT P n TO «) 0.1VSA RmAV..W!AtKNgeygppe MlA SsIa•• 2m"G ai 3P11 mart Nrye =`,ef ebae rmr�M. ` (� \ SANI iARY SEVER �` SANITARY SEWER NI ;�bn..n xwea.vnro i �•�.�� \\�.� r- v, � Exlsnwc Acsn sANrrutr; 57 R4 �aauwbreakgpweri.eoq�eeq RWSA None- ewVnnw^ry m.aa Wlt Lr _ �� / / `_:[wK[139rEA"+•F 'nI� tK� SEWER MANHOIF un L �e.rmae wcadwn[n.4d Wlee'MIlwSA PaI[ tin..E mMll MeenCesYM ee RWiA f \�� irPlexe or.mcF.mh a RWSA bol.lAye NJmY yemmx anmwve bm Ra U n - \ `; \ _ nom` DQSThVG ACSA SANTARY HE . s) n=cr.- ..�,.,.� �M,...u<.a..�w...�...m - �1,� �� _ _ i �e ;%n x •+c seWErt EAgveNT - Tie kcaa of o.. nal.n�ve N .'•mm dll'A nn�MNce W.�ef�pl Aeda em D8. 1J85 PC. 724 4 4 _. � c..erL,M ••..,,y WAl be rm mey�[aa.u. v�ee �Lw a,�oo �� '� � �- A _ A) E+,nrc R'Sm9�'xesurf ' -- deL a+l•eV^ememl. meRU to.i.erx.aum Remvad � � � \ � . / /� � _ — mYnr� "" b. AwsA a rrmry Nm PeNep, n fill o¢ rhA Ee oaR'ssL n ime Rv.S• r�I wkw � \ < � � - � � � /-'� - J .� 91 Iwvaw ltrpew¢a�IWu IIf[kn of RWSA f•..i.n..rsw •nm.,. --.x+, eGOpJmai � �` /t L � \\ �J�� 1 / - Mme>'Irav ofmw: 'PC�U � r�._E�.edw T .a.� H_ wlnE In n, m9eeA • � mM + -w��M fen �e .0 r� ewe , >>�meiAuaw,m.e � �n q J.an Me wCae�naem+rw, =lm v nmme mmh .p w,..el m�am � _ '� ( _ _ _ _ � %R o� PROPOSES B ' 52 DIP 0— SANITARY SEWER H _ _ 1 TERU mr,nR a p�e�..a Lwlr r,�, m..rm �•.a..dti. mnurrw�� / / A'r 52 :� 50 �Y o fm a•R dA Gan e�rLLlx r.�cwa pn�r A+P+a^l me fuller•Ara� �. '<� // / _ _ r No penPeem ivaewulfrl �...k�rmma �IlrR Mrreeat The 8•IrlNwl. ) 71" PRDP05ED 20'� H Z •O i F £ I i 1 ACSA Olil 2* �h M a.m i.,IMCar r >� srw ,ate s f aI lnw arc ea pmomadmwRaSA .j] �' �' %, / EA.4?1ENT 0✓- ROPOSED t t t 1,- BLOW OFF ,�T1Y' 44 6 i/_/ ��'"/A�� y , J _ r \/ •1 / /T'r / - r PROPOSED WATER PROPOSED WArER� V ■ 2 O TYP. O a \ METER ( ) _ '^ �' i\ / /' - 1/i ✓ �'� - PROPED > OS _ C it w n ro r IF~ \_ - �g .. I• eP 2 _ _ �� - , F _ •ILTERRA W // ROPOSED 822 ' -5'' a LL PROPO4-D•'• EfFND . JJ" Fl TERR �h FILTERRA BOK T- Co j =vr / `-r — J' �� '�• \ - ' NrDN SYSTEM,', 1 3 PROPOSED F0.f / fu / � O ',_ !1■ 1Yf � HYDRANT A55� - f 1 , DRAINS ( — � PROPTERRA J / / / - - ice.• �- _ / r �_ j % -iii �� % ITEER (r) . ' ,,� ,/ Rte) eox FLLERRA 80% #fTET / SAM- s cv/ - 01 PROPOSED 20; -t - � -•� ��, X PROPosm SEWER) G CSA URUTY uEu (W) PROPOSED WATER EASAIE /\ / / i a PRLYOSEp � t wATERUNE /wo�POSED SE _ uAMRAZ (TYP.) mtt 057 � /� �'•� .PROPOSED e' TEE Z c MrTEA (TVP) HYDRIN�' ,AASSueEY - . fib - ��I �,�� A ]Ill /'f ✓���. -- _ }/d � 4 /� - _ � i ,PROPOSED WATER U fF / PreoTo SEVFR H >:/ - �:� j- _ o 0'O OSBQ l -E PROPOSED FIRE / 1 N, Ol � .. ^ � HYDRANT ASSEAIiSLY EW PROPOSM 20'. / �% y /,X /i PROPOSED WATER STORM SEWER \ ' C' � METER (Tw ) ^� :� f I PRaPO a.. i . PROPOSED •� � 'z e' cv , al ') r �/ i /. • sTauf, CULVERT,.r, v a a�- _ v_/ _ 6 »�- � .PROPOSED L 8' D�_ Y r 1 � �F �9O - I ACSA swE"�T_ ���� / MATCHLINE- SUTHISSHErr u. c r s�J+R[. wtvwxea i Y - e.. a ✓ _ 7Ppn'�r �'�a� +b"_F:x y'w' 6 H .. - ay'� , -i• -� `�\�_F � ` � 1 D 1Y DIP 11NIT ARY SEWER CRAPf:iC SCALE aw ". _ ECT Nye .o S WATEREUNE�TO E�l05mTiNC D]SRNO ACSA SANITARY. HE ACSA WATERLIN€ SEINER E/SEMEN °_ _ [f Nf �� O.R. ER SE MA w V I � I � I � N W � z W N _ O 0� 111 Z N W N � > LD Z Z Lu z 0 ` J �— W 1� u f a w } 53 U L � 4 V)) d 'P J o t� u' f w � II LLj l O O J! d foe no Sf Da"NO IY CLAY WER 082023 ' SAwrARr 1 COlMFECT PROPOSED 'SANITARY SEWER TO /1 }E E%LSTINC ACSA SANTARY SEWER MANHOLE i ­6ro _,J / ^✓ 00 '� `�r/ / ' !l go° f�- _ -.�_, `�., '• �/_�, ",'� `� PROrosEn "�, n '� _ J //�� SILT FENCE -� / PR _ CSusEV mFx " \ J . \ / , _�• \ ! �il -_ . // L 1 � i / y �N -� EC /�,SILT F4� AMO TREE _ 7 PRCTECnON- L}� t rF'_ ... i / �• FnoPagn LBnrs oF. -• ' ' - � - _ \> \iii"`/ \ •'�` ,r ,��` gISTilAdAN� 11 zs Ac �. �� `- v� - T o '[ f / /,'DISTURBANCE -11.25 AC 1J e ✓ MATCNUnE SE[iw56HEFI - / W .•. � - � _ .• �0� / 1 '� 1- l''� _ - �"'� c 6E, z � • 2 / — —� (�. .�` / / K `„�"• may ` W o E E n / \ _ \ \ �\ PROPENE➢ FGwC'• \ R l \ .x �' i� - .< 9LT FENCE' i AN 2A4.N p _ l yy . - 1 / PaoPOSEDi RDTE 9LT FENCE_ f P CTION ` AND TREE _ OR CRITICAL AOPCS tASn kem I FOR SANITARY gMfR INSTALLAMXI • .r - LOCATION OF nST CTCRLE AREA, ) ✓'1 oaoroSW PSONC PROPOSED I �MANA DM NT E�SOIAENT ` ITARY griFR _ EASEMENT LbcATION OF � 1 h - - r✓t LT(�, �� sTQCKPoLE AMA, �•�� - - '�� - �' PROPOSE �,. TO Sr L CATION OF Ll _ STOCKPILE AR / - ' / PROPOSED CCNSEA�A I-/ j ' / PROPOSED r •� 1, 1 I ±�� +I � - �— \ � { NEAaY (TYP) . sTDRM sEx=R_ (n PR _�.� •'� 't I l+ Liz 1 ,. • _ SILT FENCE i i AND TREE r a 1 1 1 1 V r-1 LL Z PROTECnw •/, .•: •I~ Q 1 1 ORI Pc ACTS {r 1 w / •� , ' _ `tOS _ / 3 •� IC AI SLOPE � I �\ _ I LU Z -0.63 AC ; / l ~� 0 � o 4 LU U L Nr BWNDA w U n / T .� �� \ \ \ •` .. UNE ADWST A,EN' ', \ !� . + ' `i`C j • _ _ 1 ■ ■ i LLJ <A � r' � �1 W PROPOSED 20' 1� Vi •- STORM SEMER 11 % �L'�� lw ' f �r� z EASEMENT' LU uj - �� /� —� ~ J� b ,M � � '_� '' �' � � PRELIMINARY E65 NOTF5: W •S o�� a� y r �'�•� - - -'� �` F''� buarwx—ETN[N­nu E�Ert7mur-nn uLow+E �O �� r� _ 1F '�I�! PRDPOSED PISTIU�FL✓J. `yI 'PROPOSED OFF -SITE _ 1 E A4ATI tI 13: OF E�SrDN CO SEDIMENT NNL WCLUOE THE •J CRITICAL SLOPE IMPACTS w5T•y.AipN OV PEFIMf'€a.5E01MENT BAFnS,fil PE6WETEni �YAC LE 4T1- -�"=T �'�� SEPwIENT TfuP,vEfuW1'En IM�EPSrON i1EKFS5LLTPFKF. AND - % /0.08 AC VEHICLE PARKING TAEEP>OTE(':iON tOW. TnC OITI'FPLMSCIF D6TyRBED AaFAS D - '• li PROPOSED LVTS OF Wes" r +ISr [STAGING, AREA Yru r!r �.(°yv, -� + AND ALONG ALL OMEIISFIEESAVEAPEAS. g 2 %...fi'fi•II(' r f.K'P4 / - DISTUREANCE -11.26 AG I.'d yy� +r Yom. h AFIEAfi43s14 W5lElYBEFN xOPGM F�APFO AkO THE PANKIN4 IoD raN = 8 RE iIWIDF98�O1. ' ' �1•� .�. LENNWAIE AN00>• AGE STRUC N LEO, TE_ �l ILMPpARrSEOWENT BAS FOD:FS NT.y Axe 082023 3 TADS[ NBE NST LEDAN {+b:W Nk nl ALI BU�LpmG E PADS UNBE NSTgLLED ANp vREVAREG FOR B[jY ➢•.G j OAT ON .SA 6CAN �E INST—CD VnTH PUNOE� Y - / - - _ •: ' aJ j � '�� ^� 'ttY�TROLLED BYSET FENC[ONCE THE PARKV�G I. �CIiW.wN r ._f" v / — A _ J l ,�.� 1 i cunEleaaElC+D 6wDIIIrA =� .6 s NsrA..zr `7 NO _'• NNNN �_� t<' ' J 7 Plant Legend: _ - - - _ -- -- - -_ - - -T — - r� ��.H oF� Abb. SpBlttif Name Common NameCaBper Slze Comments. 10 -YR ._Total Interior Onslte - "` in I:CANOPY: QualCanoPY S o1.Ji5Guwtky!C —py a CANOPY TREES / �V AR Ater rubrum'October Gb October Glory Red Map4e 2.12' 452 12 S 424 8 3.616 FP Fraxirws nns niw _ Green Ash 2 12 " 672 19 12,768 18 72 096 OP Quartos PalusVis Pin Oak 212' 419 38 24,302 8 1 3,352 - UNDERS _- TORY TREES _ AG Amelam wr x GmndHlom'Autwnn Brillance' Autumn Brilliance 6' - 7' J.ults st.m 130 1 13 1 7,690 4 52p CC Certis Canadensis American Redbud ^6' - T -._. 16 -T 124 1 8 1 992 6 744 PY jPmnusyedce is -- Yosh C ino he^ - -_ ... - -.. ... .. i _99__. 1 16 _ 1 1584 1 7 j 693-1 SHRUBS CA Clethm aJmfolta is mersweet 24' ht. j 1 16 1 77 1 272 1 0 1 0 CS C.— serioea Red Twig D wood 24thl, 72 33 2.376 0 0 IG Ilex Glabm'Shamro& Shamrock lrkbeny HoPy 24 t 23 403 9.269 0 0 IV I lex verticillata'Winter Red' Winter Red Winterbe 24 41 36 1,476 0 0 FI Fors 1a x intenned�a Fors a 24432 9 JC Juni erns chiensis Chinese Ju r 24 t1 fit 682 0 0 SCREENING IC Ilex crenata'Sieeds' Steeds Holty 36' hL 10 33 270 0 p IN Ilex x'Nellie R Stevens' Nellie R Stevens Holty � 313' h 44 27 7,216 0 1 b VB Vibumum xburkv d+ 8urk, —od Vlbumum 36' ht 22 164 0 0 T p - -. -- j 68753! 21.927 ! � r } e Z 'o -^L:.r �..al! �w'.`4'.:4 [I..+M -] INXC lw fF� -�i+/ •u la. S^�' . •���.• t C - _ _ _ - _ - O { �� Calculations: o LU ... :i.�Eb /• � / - 'rim -.c'�! �✓��' rzSSr- o . F1._r Notes: ir 'z, - � .'4 rt.„n � •...;:. n, so-.wm eo-.cr....c ,»v zr:. ,.acre.. -- / � 1 � . � , � � � / ._� , '. >al� .ews. r m,.:e+,w..dw. m..n .,. r< nees.ae • .,ee.m ss. ' ... � �/" �` � � - -�� / � � • � X�7 � ' °° ��L. `✓ Z Q J • .,- .. , - .. w'a"'eriw�c.. ecn:o i;:�ivs. �� ' �, � ..�.� /'. "i . � � ve _ rs �e / i / y` f �"' � Q' W ,. .. - ...ru. _- .•ss o-w cc a .� .,5 -n-, .-.� � " ncr rs "� - � � - � / ��i I_ _ •.� ���'�.' � � / ,.., � - - � �/ n a..cx. o• acs u� cvr•..¢ w • r ..u. Mw,. weer u�oms i • -zt _ t` �'� 1 �� _ x �% �: C ,/ I- 4 ✓r' �'Y-5i �,. o&r:4ieeo0.KC m .: i.��m: Kn.er:.� uas v c�u..ro, .., r �.�- � � rug c - � � - � � . "' . oa b - t." � cal r wrtn ow.a-v...ara wc.c ..nen. v..ae .w w,• _ O ° n r ..r.,, wan p.nrn W .::rd $ iit" «d .� �F • •• t 5 wrn n•.,. s •a. merr.� ,� vrcw fo>�. m ve ., r o T /- � _ � - / / _ I� � •-C _ � � � < aFx r a�d� .i P�.oTrc"�ur ,�G - j X „ 1 - , G , ,. r. _ .r .l r e utw ry �sw u „s - / t , hi / --• a' ° _� LD _1 W > J C7 axwrN�y r �-� ors .x.o d Z .� .. M1U'•wS. �[r, Rtwl �rr aaU ,kie .. • ��!P w P'+�W /-� 7 c r--1 F 0 Q LO LO w n' U. Conservation Plan Notes: 1, � ,fix "/ _ • � 1 u Z r i� �[ . r�r, • / r �_ _ W j i eh smY FTC s �tiBk ' n y S wee w n:Yvntnrti 2 ar - I c� Of •r .. • r.,.tllac 21 i J W - ery�r. t e +�[ ..rµc�irt..CE�•Am[t +eSt . 1 ... '�. . ,.,/ q .... .. o'oV'M •wrsiu 1cE a.in• . wu M �r[.Y.� [ ux WE wa s.w-. LA sG.�[[r �Y ~•\ -' /J _ o O •: 0 0810237 CRAFWC SCALE { ova r - . a ., i�sc�•'e sw�8rro J i� 1 Conservation Plan Notes: oF` u oN =1 [s % Y - ai PERYANEh I.� GLAI k ' A <qL c Y a1TE. �E$ iC x .RC$[Rv P •ND \ \ AF RE 70 B� \. r ✓s �AT��� N .�,r • v rw_ a •s�aE • p�FL HE � *R[e_ :o e= - ��' Cfi C ^ X TC' `C 'Na d •`� :ww W X TREES TO AL:RES — 1 ,. / I, /F r t ;... - .. is - i .. ... _. -. .. . �l .'.� _ � •..� � /,. f ` U �C LIM � OF Pugt , �� � � y Lu alwo7lLa THE '0. BE PRE,RVED / / / 4 t z, I vac= CT.rE = eacli.e A'',ID PRO EC'n - -0 // gpy� -pF £iCS1lNG TREEc r� gr aRCSLk s'EG E' � Y - -T�r«rE`r• D _D RED. \ LU W / UI � �, r , ✓ - N LU > o of z LU o /�C��� Z a O W 0 v� ✓ / o 1 W U LU I- "��� L E LU . � ,, i � � �/, .,: v � yam✓ � — _ � �; 082023 023 APHIC �Z.7�, 19 106, LU CD M LU LIP T CD IN 4V, CID AC, �p All AV CD r4 Uj �D LU 0 In C-4, J Im LLI rp cl to kq ..cD ro-A Ln (4D I - —\\ V,, �w w— CA K12 El 11 11 E30 MEN �Z.7�, 19 106, LU CD M LU LIP T CD IN 4V, CID AC, �p All AV CD r4 Uj �D LU 0 In C-4, J Im LLI rp cl to kq ..cD ro-A Ln (4D I - —\\ V,, �w w— CA K12 Pagel of 2 Gerald Gatobu From: Andy McGinty [andy @colewaydevelopment.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 8:20 PM To: Gerald Gatobu Cc: Scott Collins; Valerie Long Subject: Arden Place Waivers Gerald, I am writing to summarize the development team's interpretation of the County ordinances as they relate the Arden Place preliminary site plan that Collins Engineering submitted on Monday. On the previous submission of the development plan, there were three waivers that would require Planning Commission approval: (1) a critical slope waiver; (2) a buffer disturbance waiver, and (3) a two public street connection waiver. We believe that the June 1 submission addresses each of these previously required waivers. Critical Slope Waivers for the Access Roads — Satisfied per 4.2.6 -c We are proposing two access roads for connections with the Woodbrook subdivision and Putt Putt Place; both of the access roads impact critical slope areas. Several points are relevant here: The only critical slope areas impacted by the proposed development involve the access roads. These access roads are required to satisfy the two public street connection ordinance. There are no other options for connecting to public streets, thus these roads are necessary for the development. Section 4.2.6 -c of the ordinance provides an exemption permitting development on critical slope areas for necessary road improvements when no alternative exists. I believe we have sufficiently demonstrated that no other connection options are available. Over the past 6 months I have repeatedly and aggressively pursued alternative connections through both the Carmike Cinema parcel and Albemarle Square Shopping Center parcel. While I prefer either of these connections to the Woodbrook connection, unfortunately they are not an option in the forseable future. As the critical slope impact is necessary, the project should be administratively exempted from a Critical Slope waiver per 4.2.6 -c. The project should not be required to obtain Planning Commission approval for a Critical Slopes waiver. Buffer Disturbance Waiver Ordinance 21.7.3 states that `no construction activity... shall occur closer than 20 feet to any residential district'. The primary access road connecting the development with Putt Putt Place must cross through the commercial portion of the property to create public street access for the residential portion of the property. Again, this is a necessary and required road and cannot be routed through another location that would avoid disturbance of the commercial buffer area. Per the guidelines set forth in 21.7.3, we feel the project has demonstrated that the grading and clearing in the buffer area is necessary and unavoidable , and that it will result in an improved site design. Further, we are proposing an extra setback between the parcels on the residential side as well as ample landscape screening to satisfy the guidelines for a waiver to this ordinance. We hope you agree that we have satisfied the criteria for the waiver and that you can recommend it for approval. Further, granting of this waiver is in -line with the visions set -forth in the comprehensive growth plan and Places 29 master plan for this parcel. These growth visions promote mixed use development — not the segregation of uses that is outlined in 21.7. Ordinance 21.7 was clearly intended to protect lower density residential and rural districts from commercial encroachment — not to restrict the walk -able, automobile independent communities envisioned in the Place 29 master plan. Attachment C 6/16/2009 Page 2 of 2 Two Public Street Connections With a connection to Woodbrook and Putt Putt Place, the June 1 submission satisfies the two public street connection requirement, so we no longer need a waiver of that requirement. We look forward to comparing our interpretation of the relevant ordinances with the County's. Please let me know when you are available to discuss. Regards, Andy Andy McGinty Coleway Development andy @colewaydevelopment.com (m) 434 - 242 -7412 (f) 866 - 266 -0977 610 Preston Avenue, Charlottesville VA, 22903 6/16/2009 Page 1 of 2 Gerald Gatobu From: Andy McGinty [andy @colewaydevelopment.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 9:54 AM To: Amy Pflaum Cc: Gerald Gatobu; Valerie Long; Scott Collins Subject: Arden - Traffic Access Requirements Amy, I'm writing to ask for confirmation that VDOT and your office are able to support the Arden project with the Putt Putt connection and the Woodbrook connection restricted to emergency access only. As I understand it, there is potentially a health and safety issue for Arden Place regarding the single Putt Putt traffic connection and the Rio /29 intersection, and that a second connection may be required to alleviate the traffic problems. While it is my strong preference to not build the Woodbrook connection, or to build it as a reduced service connection, I don't think there is any point in offering to eliminate it as a traffic connection unless we can say with certainty that it is not necessary for public safety. I don't want to get into the situation where it is eliminated during the heat of the June 23rd meeting only to have to come back and ask for it later to meet a VDOT requirement. VDOT was provided with the traffic study over two months ago a should be able to provide a conclusive determination before the 23rd meeting. (The Putt Putt only connection studied in the Ramey Kemp report is the same, in effect, as the Putt Putt + Woodbrook emergency only connection now under consideration.) An update to Glenn's memo dated May 1, 2009 clarifying the current status and making a clear recommendation to the necessity and form of Woodbrook connection is needed. To recap the points he raised and where the project stands relative to them: 1. "The study provides conclusive evidence that the connection to Albemarle Square must be made." This is not an option at this time. I have made several attempts to purchase the rights to the connection with no success. We are proposing to build /bond a road to make the connection when it becomes available. 2. "Only a signal at [Putt Putt and Rio] would [mitigate the impacts]" This is not an option — VDOT will not allow a signal to be installed. According to VDOT, we are nowhere near meeting the warrants necessary for a signal install. 3. "impacts to already failing intersection movements at 29 and Rio have not been mitigated.... connections to Albemarle Square, a connection to Woodbrook, ... should be provided." Per Glenn's recommendation, we have added a connection to Woodbrook for traffic. Each of Glenn's comments make reference to the need for a second connection for traffic access — not emergency vehicle access. Again, I hope we are able to proceed with an emergency only Woodbrook connection (or even better, no connection at all), but baring positive confirmation that Arden will be supported without the Woodbrook traffic connection, I would ask that any discussion of it as an emergency only access be removed from the 23rd agenda and we proceed assuming it is a traffic connection. As a final point, the current plan allows for a 2nd emergency access to Arden from the Rio Hill community. If emergency access is the issue necessitating two connections, it would seem this requirement is meet without any Woodbrook connection at all. Attachment C 6/16/2009 Page 2 of 2 Thanks, Andy Andy McGinty Coleway Development andy @colewaydevelopment.com (m) 434- 242 -7412 (f) 866- 266 -0977 610 Preston Avenue, Charlottesville VA, 22903 6/16/2009 ��RGIN« COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 May 8, 2009 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 800 East Jefferson Street Charlottesville VA 22902 RE: ARB2009- 00025; Arden Place Tax 61, Parcel 124 Dear Mr. Collins, The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on May 4, 2009, completed a preliminary review of the above -noted request to construct a six - building, 187 -unit, multi - family residential development. The Board offered the following comments for the benefit of the applicant's next submittal. Please note that the following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments may be added or eliminated based on further review and changes to the plan. 1. The ARB supports the maintenance of the 50' buffer and supports a road configuration that minimizes the impact on the 50' buffer. 2. Provide a site /building section demonstrating visibility of the proposal as viewed from the Rio Road East Corridor across the Rio Hill Drive right -of -way. Provide a section from Rio Road across the battery shop, the Albemarle Square entrance road, the center line of the connector road, and through the retaining wall, as it is anticipated to be developed. 3. Revise Sheet 6 Site Plan and /or Sheet 11 Arden Place Clubhouse Exterior Elevations, as needed, to correct the lack of coordination between the design of the building footprint and the building elevations. Revise Sheet 11 Arden Place Clubhouse Exterior Elevations and Sheet 12 Arden Place Exterior Building Elevations to include roof plans of the clubhouse and apartment buildings. 4. Revise Sheet 11 Arden Place Clubhouse Exterior Elevations to show a redesigned entry bay and pediment whose height and width are more proportional with each other and the overall elevation. 5. Revise Sheet 11 Arden Place Clubhouse Exterior Elevations by identifying proposed materials and colors, and configuration of the cupola. 6. Revise the southwest end elevation of Apartment Building 1, to relieve its blank appearance, by adding windows or replacing the vertical siding with the proposed brick. Consider redesigning the center section of the elevation to project inward or outward. 7. Revise Sheet 7 Landscape Plan to show an evergreen species in place of the semi - evergreen Burkwood Viburnum proposed around the perimeter of the ground- mounted HVAC units at each end of the apartment buildings. 8. Revise the site and building layout to more consistently address the requirements of the site grading guidelines listed under "Development Pattern ". 9. Revise the interior parking lot tree count to not include perimeter parking lot trees. Revise the site /parking design to allow for a 10' wide planting strip along the full length of the eastern boundary, free of retaining walls, for perimeter parking lot trees, 40' on center, 2' /z" caliper minimum. 10. Revise Sheet 7 Landscaping Plan by showing the street trees, 2' /z" caliper, 40' on center, on both sides the entry roads and roads extending from them. 11. Revise Sheet 7 Landscaping Plan with the addition of 2 large canopy species and 1 understory species with proposed quantities for both categories as near equal as possible. 12. Revise the lighting proposal to include all exterior building lighting. All such lighting in excess of 3,000 lumens shall meet full cut off requirements. Revise Sheet 10 Lighting Details to include the catalog numbers with the cutsheets. These numbers shall be coordinated with the catalog numbers in the ATTACHMENT 1? Luminaire Schedule. 13. Revise Sheet 7 Landscaping Plan and Sheet 6 Site Plan by including the location of all proposed site lighting. Avoid conflicts with proposed plantings or existing and proposed utilities. Revise Sheet 9 Lighting Plan to include the following note: Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 ormore initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one -half footcandle. 14. Designs for all freestanding signage visible from the Corridor will need to meet ARB Sign Guidelines, with locations free of conflicts with utilities and landscaping. An ARB sign application for freestanding signage is an additional application that can be submitted separately from the ARB site plan application. For building signage visible from the Corridor, provide revised elevations showing the sign location along with details, including materials, colors and dimensions, of the sign design. Wall and freestanding signs will require a sign permit in addition to ARB approval. You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms, checklists and schedules are available on -line at www.albemarle.org /planninq. Revised drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing and an ARB approval signature panel. Please provide a memo including detailed responses indicating how each comment has been addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Brent Nelson Landscape Planner cc: Coleway Development LLC 610 Preston Avenue Charlottesville, VA 22902 James E Kelley Jr 2555 Temple Trail Winter Park FL 32789 Charlottesville Realty Corporation P. O. Box 6340 Charlottesville, VA 22906 Gerald Gatobu, Current Development File do Emm �tnJ 16 ❑! I I❑ I I I t ❑■❑ ■■■ H K W I •Y . d � N - .. Lk C1 � � '� Q�w Q4 ,w *o � ?'ice `•°'�,V 4�. O N j ' 1 m .y I��, Q '� , , 1 w , ��V�4 /.� /L9*�rR�( Y�„U.r �' ��� a� o �} Lo ,,�,� j 4 r r -�y �r•� �+��a1r 4 U'M '"'•tid •r/�' ti�� �y ,� � � eT S� .,r �� � 1 • N yi r, �I�S N`N G m in \ � `N�° . ❑ .r c I° 4• ° e N ` � � m N T rti N�ca w Q• � � wr� � �. _ a I , m' _ .fie-" r rv• � d Q w o .� V U �' R 00 ��a . L+ ,.�R .. - yy !gyp _] . N a � . ' / �•, . Lo Fn }�'h r•~•3 . y�,y 'a d ,'l4'`+', S) rw {� m ~N V'G- .N- cfl • + //� •�.L �¢��+�r L ¢� K •� R c - 1 :. )rye ' w N - Y, "` ':�i. -�` -U .. - . .. ry f; :...� U � • � � ,U 'n u i �;�, !r - � /�y 1 4.1 ` -. r � N •\ cn � i � � i �� ?I V rry1 +D L) m 'trT r d m,r - r lr • i .i .! 4 Ff7l _ s' w t'0 � V N�, oo : O N CO in ca CD V. �7 (3. : rr r- r�• • e d!,Ct , r .S, �S[}�1�r_. `N °T -•f44 +� `fi g:}. _ N ip r N ,o -s`4_�, `^ nl _' 7. Ln LL r�� fN! N4j r ..`7N�yryr y CA� o,Y n �j '7 RN M O q 4 41i}�- ov7�J�s ? •�� '"7�,.'.,� � gip" ..,�_ rc_ 7 g .5 7 � ��,J7,.73... � .7y -{.. �1i1..�`���;' ,•.i 'R ,i► -1_�J� ..a�- r' _�f 1 l.� ;+ •�11•�1. �IAW 8 s a E E U E U CC i M V COMMONWEALTH of VIRCjINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER June 2, 2009 Mr. Juandiego Wade Albemarle County 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Wade, In accordance with § 15.2- 2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24 VAC 30 -155, a traffic impact analysis was prepared by Ramey Kemp and Associates on the site plan for the proposed development project entitled Arden Place submitted by M &N Partners. We have evaluated this traffic impact analysis and prepared a report that summarizes the key findings and conclusions of the analysis. VDOT's report also includes recommendations for improvements for this site Our report is attached to assist the county in their decision making process regarding the proposed development. I am available at your convenience to meet and discuss VDOT's finding if you need assistance. And finally, I ask that you include VDOT's key findings of the traffic analysis in the official public records on the proposed project and have this letter, our report, and the traffic impact analysis placed in the case file for this site plan. VDOT will make these documents available to the general public through various methods including posting them on VDOT's website. Sincerely, Joel D DeNunzio 2009.06.02 09:21:42 - 04'00' Joel DeNunr_io Staff Engineer WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Attachment F SDP - 2009 -00009 Arden Place Traffic Impact Analysis Report Albemarle County, VA VDOT's analysis of the subject report finds the following: • The TIA report is acceptable as it was submitted. • VDOT concurs that a signal at the intersection with Putt Putt Place and Rio Road will not be warranted with this development. • VDOT recommends the connection from Putt Putt Place to Albemarle Square be required as part of the development.