HomeMy WebLinkAboutACE200800007 Correspondence 2006-01-31Page 1 of 1
Ches Goodall
To: Karen Pape
Subject: RE: Barclay Rives
Karen:
In reviewing the documents I found, here is the answer to your question.
When Scott Clark created his map showing "usable" development lots or building sites, he was using information
from John Shepherd's February 8 "Official Determination of Development Rights ". This report identified a total of
17 rights with 6 (1 + 5) on Tax Map 65 -121. On April 7, John revised his original determination of development
rights in a "Letter of Correction" to show that TM 65 -121 had one additional small lot and a total of 18 rights.
Unfortunately, Scott's map does not reflect the revised determination. The bottomlime: You are right, TM 65 -121
should have 6 small lots and 1 remainder.
Thanks for catching this.
Ches
From: Karen Pape [mailto:karen @papeandco.com]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 3:32 PM
To: Ches Goodall
Subject: Barclay Rives
Hi Ches,
I looked at Mr. Rives property today. It is always the small ones that are the most difficult! I have a
quick question. Mr. Shepherd determined that 65 -121 had six development rights and one 21 acre
parcel due to that 1 acre piece that was subdivided in 1971. However, the building sites sketch does
not reflect this. I believe that 65 -121 should have six small lots and one remainder, while it shows
only five small lots and one remainder. Could we get that corrected to reflect John's determination?
The useable building sites should total 18 if my math is correct and the sites can be found (looks like
there should be no problem).
I am looking at Gilmer and Rushia next week and am moving through them one by one after that.
Thanks!
Karen
1/31/2006