Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP200800009 Staff Report 2009-08-18of AL _n �rrrc:rnP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY Project Name: SP 2008-009 Animal Wellness Staff: Rebecca Ragsdale Planning Commission Public Hearing: Board of Supervisors Public Hearing: August 18, 2009 Not yet scheduled Owners: 1100 Crozet Avenue, LLC (Gwendolyn/Henry Smith) Acreage: 1.32 acres TMP: 56A2-1-07 Location: 1100 Crozet Avenue Magisterial District: White Hall Proposal: Reuse of an existing building for a veterinary clinic DA: Community of Crozet Character of Property: Previously residential, now vacant/storage use Factors Favorable: Applicant: Animal Wellness Special Use Permit: Veterinary Hospital Existing Zoning and By -right use: Downtown Crozet District (DCD) Units: NA Conditions: Yes Requested # of Dwelling Comprehensive Plan Designation: CT 5 Urban Center & CT 1 Preservation Use of Surrounding Properties: office, residential, and undevelop+ Factors Unfavorable: 1. The Land Use Plan is supportive of There are no unfavorable factors. the vet use. 2. The vet will be a new business located in Downtown Crozet adaptively reusing a currently vacant building. 3. There will be no detrimental impacts on surrounding properties. _ RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with conditions of the special use permit request. Modifications to regulations to minimum setbacks for veterinary clinics of Section 5.1.11 and waiver of parking location requirements of the Downtown Crozet District are also requested and recommended for approval. 0 STAFF PERSON: Rebecca Ragsdale PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: August 18, 2009 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATE: Not yet scheduled SP 2008-009 Animal Wellness PETITION: PROJECT: SP 2008-009 Animal Wellness Center PROPOSED: Veterinary Clinic for small animals ZONING CATEGORY/GENERAL USAGE: DCD Downtown Crozet District -variety of commercial uses including office, retail, service, and civic uses; residential uses if mixed use (up to 36 units/acre); light industrial uses by special use permit. SECTION: 208.2.E.17 Veterinary offices and animal hospitals. Veterinary office and hospital; 5. 1.11 Commercial Kennel, Veterinary Service, Office Or Hospital, Animal Hospital, Animal Shelter COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Community of Crozet, CT5 Neighborhood Center in the Crozet Master Plan which allows for a mix of uses and residential types at net densities of up to 12 units per acre; up to 18 units per acre if in a mixed use setting and CT 1 Development Area Preserve. ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes LOCATION: 1100 Crozet Avenue/Route 240, approx. 400 feet south of the intersection of Jarmans Gap Road and Crozet Avenue TAX MAP/PARCEL: 056A2-01-00-00700 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: White Hall CHARACTER OF THE AREA The veterinary hospital is proposed within an existing one-story building, previously used as apartments, that dates to 1950. The parcel is about 3.4 acres, is zoned Downtown Crozet District (DCD) and is designated CT 5 and CT 1 in the Crozet Master Plan on the edge of Downtown. The building is set back from Crozet Avenue with driveway, parking, and trees in front. The back half of the property is mostly undevelopable. Powell's Creek forms the western boundary of the property with stream buffers and there is also a drainage way that runs behind the existing building, which is included in the County's stormwater project for Downtown. The adjoining property to the north is also zoned DCD and house on that property is used for as offices. The properties adjoining to the south, east and west are zoned R2 Residential. The property to the south will be purchased and used for the County's stormwater project. Properties to the east and west are used for residences. (Attachments A -Aerial, Attachment 13 - Zoning, Attachment C -Crozet Master Plan) SPECIFICS OF THE PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing a veterinary clinic within the existing 24'x100' structure. The applicant has indicated that there will be minimal outdoor activity, with occasional dog walking but no other outdoor activities or kennels. There will be no boarding services provided, except for those animals at the vet for treatment. The expected number of employees will be 6-8, and there may be additional interns or summer employees. A proposed floor plan is provided as Attachment D. With reuse of the property, VDOT requires a relocated entrance and parking is needed which necessitates a site plan. The applicant is also requesting a modification from the DCD requirements for the location of parking, since it will not be relegated. Since this is reuse of an exiting building with limited site improvements, the special use permit review is limited to impacts of the veterinary clinics land use, which is only permitted by special use permit in the DCD district (Concept Plan is provided as Attachment E) PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY The property was zoned R2 Residential prior to 1980 when it was zoned C-1 Commercial. The property was rezoned to Downtown Crozet District (DCD) by the County on June 11, 2008. The property could develop by -right with a range of commercial uses or mixed use under the DCD district. CONFORMITY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Crozet Master Plan Staff believes that this proposal is in keeping with the master plan goals for Downtown. The property is designated CT 5 Urban Center and CT1 Development Area Preserve. The range of land uses recommended for CT 5 is open, including retail, services, office, and residential uses, so veterinary clinics would be a commercial use consistent with that land use designation. The Master Plan also recommends Development Area Preserve CT1 (natural area greenway) on the parcel. (see insets below) The CT1 (green) area running through the middle of the property is intended to represent preservation of the drainage channel that runs behind the building proposed for redevelopment. The Green Infrastructure Plan also suggests a future greenway connection (white line on Green Infrastructure map below) running along the rear property line. The County has not begun discussions with the applicant regarding the future greenway as efforts have been focused on working with the applicant to accomplish the County Stormwater project, which would impact portions of the front of this property, as well as along the drainage channel behind the building, with needed easements. Crozet MasterPlan Place -Type u Built Infrastructure Map Green Infrastructure Map Neighborhood Model - A full analysis of the Neighborhood Model has not been done because of the low level of change proposed for the site. The relevant principles are redevelopment, relegated parking and pedestrian orientation. The special use permit request is for a veterinary use within an existing building and site development changes to accommodate reuse of the building include relocation of the entrance drive, parking, and landscaping. The existing building pre -dates zoning and the neighborhood model. Until or unless a new building is constructed which would be closer to Crozet Avenue and given the environmental features on the site, it is not possible to relegate parking. This is discussed further under the DCD waiver request for parking location below. The Downtown Crozet District also requires a sidewalk and street tress, which would provide for pedestrian orientation/neighborhood friendly streets and paths. Staff notes that this proposal will provide redevelopment in Downtown Crozet. STAFF COMMENT Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance as follows: 39.2.4.9: Special Use Permits provided for in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, There is no expected detriment to adjoining properties. The supplemental regulations in Section 5.1.11 of the Zoning Ordinance discussed below address potential impacts unique to a veterinary use, such as noise affecting nearby residential properties or compatibility with other adjacent commercial uses. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby and This proposal is for reuse of an existing structure and a relocation of a new driveway to meet VDOT standards. The property is located along an Entrance Corridor (Route 240/Crozet Avenue) and within the potential Crozet Historic District. Advisory staff comments have been provided regarding the proposal from ARB staff. This property forms a portion of the southern boundary of the potential Crozet Historic District. As such it forms the entrance to the historic district from the south on Crozet Avenue. The district has been determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, and this property is considered a contributing resource to that district. The one-story masonry structure was constructed as an apartment building ca. 1950. The property currently retains a residential character. Retaining the existing drive would have less impact on the site in general and on the wooded area in particular and was recommended instead of creating a new drive to reduce impacts to the Entrance Corridor and the historic district. However, the relocated driveway is needed to meet sight distance and provide for a safe entrance /exit to the property. To mitigate impacts to the Entrance Corridor from the new drive, new planting will be required along the frontage and in the disturbed areas. Entrance Corridor guidelines and recommendations from the Crozet Historic Resources study will be considered during the review of the planting proposal, at the time a site plan is submitted. The planting will be expected to maintain the residential character of the site and to screen the view of the parking from the road. that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, The DCD Zoning District was established to facilitate traditional downtown development, as described for the CT6 Urban Core and CT5 Urban Center transects in the Crozet master plan. To these ends, the DCD provides for flexibility and variety of development for retail, service, and civic uses with light industrial and residential uses as secondary uses. The regulations for the DCD are intended to promote a development form and character that is different from typical suburban development allowed by conventional zoning, and are also intended to: (i) promote the economic and social vitality and diversity of downtown Crozet; (ii) implement the Crozet master plan for the downtown area of Crozet so that it may serve as the commercial hub of Crozet and its environs; (iii) provide a greater mix of uses in downtown Crozet, including increased employment; (iv) facilitate infill and redevelopment; (v) increase the utility of the land; (vi) retain the uniquely diverse character of Crozet; and (vii) promote a pedestrian - friendly environment. The proposed vet at this location is consistent with this district in that it provides for reuse of the site in a manner that adds to the mix of uses in Downtown and a contributing structure to the potential historic district is being adaptively reused. with uses permitted by -right in the district, Veterinary uses are by special use permit so that any conflicts with other uses in the district can be considered. Supplemental regulations ensure that noise and other potential impacts are addressed so there is on conflict with other by -right uses. The veterinary clinic will use the entire building on the property so there would be no conflicts with other by -right uses on the site. with the additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of this ordinance, Section 5. 1.11 is applicable to the proposed vet use and each regulation is addressed below. a. Except where animals are confined in soundproofed, air-conditioned buildings, no structure or area occupied by animals shall be closer than five hundred (500) feet to any agricultural or residential lot line. For non -soundproofed animal confinements, an external solid fence not less than six (6) feet in height shall be located within fifty (50) feet of the animal confinement and shall be composed of concrete block, brick, or other material approved by the zoning administrator; (Amended 11-15-89) Animals will be confined to the building while receiving treatment at the veterinary clinic. b. For soundproofed confinements, no such structure shall be located closer than two hundred (200) feet to any agricultural or residential lot fine. For soundproofed confinements, noise measured at the nearest agricultural or residential property line shall not exceed fifty-five (55) decibels; (Amended 11-15-89; 6-14- 00) A request from the applicant has been made to modify this requirement The building in which the veterinary use would be located is less than 200 feet from the adjoining R1 Residential lot line to the south and is approximately 50' from that property line. The County is under negotiations to purchase that property for the Crozet Stormwater Project and it is not anticipated to develop with residential uses. The applicant has also submitted an engineer's report confirming that the building is soundproofed, but that if the room with a window is used for treatment, additional soundproofing may be needed as a precaution. Staff recommends approval of this modification, provided that additional soundproofing around the existing windows is provided, or for new window, adequate sound dampening is provided. The applicant has indicated they intend to replace all windows, which would provide additional sound dampening. c. In all cases, animals shall be confined in an enclosed building from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. (Amended 11-15-89; 6-14-00) The applicant has indicated that this requirement will be met based on proposed business hours, by appointment, between 7:30a.m. and 6Mp.m. There would be no outdoor activity outside these hours. d. In areas where such uses may be in proximity to other uses involving intensive activity such as shopping centers or other urban density locations, special attention is required to protect the public health and welfare. To these ends the commission and board may require among other things: (Amended 11-15-89) -Separate building entrance and exit to avoid animal conflicts; (Added 11-15-89) -Area for outside exercise to be exclusive from access by the public by fencing or other means. (Added 11-15-89) As mentioned above, the vet will be the sole occupant of the building on the property so there is not need to impose any additional requirements for a separate building entrance. The applicant has explained that there is not a need for the proposed vet business to have a defined fenced -in area as the only outdoor activity will be occasional walking of dogs. Nevertheless, staff feels that the area of outdoor activity should be specified with the special use permit and has recommended a condition of approval that separates this activity from public access. and with the public health, safety and general welfare. The public health, safety, and general welfare of the community are protected through the special use permit process which assures that the proposed uses are appropriate in the location requested. Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) and the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority (RWSA) have provided comments. (Attachment G and H) The site is currently served by public water but is not connected to sewer. The applicant intends to connect to sewer as part of this project and will connect to the ACSA line although there is also a RWSA sewer line near the site. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the entrance to the site be relocated to the south to provide adequate site distance and that it be upgraded to VDOT standards for a commercial entrance. (Attachment I)The relocated entrance is provided on the applicant's Concept Plan. DCD Requirements- Waiver to allow alternative location of parking area The DCD requires relegated parking and for that parking as an accessory use, that it be no closer to the right-of-way than any existing or proposed primary structure on a lot. Parking areas are required to be located to the rear/and or side of primary structures as viewed from the right- of-way. The ordinance makes no exception for existing parking areas but provides for a Planning Commission waiver to allow an alternate parking location. The waiver section and staff analysis are provided below. Waiver to allow alternative locution of parking area. The parking area setback requirements in subsection 20B.3(A) may be waived as follows: 1. Consideration by commission. The commission may waive the parking area setback requirements in subsection. 20B.3(A) and allow a parking area to be located between a street and a primary structure, subject to reasonable conditions that it may impose, upon a finding that: a. There are unusual physical conditions on the lot or an adjoining lot including, but not limited to, the location of existing structures and parking areas, steep topography or other environmental features, narrowness or shallowness or the size or shape of the lot that make it impossible or unfeasible to provide parking to the side or rear of a primary structure; The waiver is requested and supported by staff based on this criteria of the ordinance. The applicant wishes to reuse an existing structure, which is permitted in the DCD district. However, due to the location of the existing structure and drainage channels on the site, and narrowness of the lot, it is not possible to locate parking so that it is no closer to the street than the existing structure. b. The potential safety of patrons and employees cannot be achieved with adequate lighting and other reasonable design solutions; or There are no safety concerns and this is not an issue for consideration of the waiver. c. The strict application of the applicable regulations in subsection 20B.3(A) would not further the purposes of this chapter or otherwise serve the public health, safety, or welfare or achieve the goals established in the comprehensive plan The strict application of the parking setbacks can only be achieved if the site is completely redeveloped. There are no conflicts public safety issues or conflicts with the goals of the comprehensive plan with permitting this waiver. The project would meet the following goals for Downtown from the master plan and also stated in the intent of the DCD district: o Implement the Crozet master plan for the downtown area of Crozet so that it may serve as the commercial hub of Crozet and its environs; o Provide a greater mix of uses in downtown Crozet, including increased employment; o Facilitate infill and redevelopment Staff recommends approval of the waiver, provided that the parking is screened in accordance with the DCD requirements and recommendations of the ARB. SUMMARY Staff has identified the following factors favorable to this application: 1. The Land Use Plan is supportive of the vet use. 2. The vet will be a new business located in Downtown Crozet adaptively reusing a currently vacant building. 3. There will be no detrimental impacts on surrounding properties. Staff has identified not identified unfavorable factors to this application. RECOMMENDED ACTION: SP 2009-008 Based on the findings contained in this staff report, staff recommends approval of Special Use Permit 2008-009 with the following conditions: 1. Development of the use shall be in accord with the concept plan, entitled "Animal Wellness" prepared by TCS Engineering Co., LLC and last revised July 14, 2009, as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning Administrator. To be in conformity with the plan, development shall reflect the following elements only and all other elements of the plan may be modified during site plan review and approval: entrance relocation, general location of parking areas, and outside area for walking animals. Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. 2. This special use permit applies to the existing building and any new buildings forthe veterinary use will require a new special use permit. 3. No overnight boarding use, other than for those animals under medical care shall take place at the veterinary hospital. 4. The building shall be sound -proofed and air-conditioned. 5. No outdoor exercise area shall be permitted. However, walking of animals is permitted and shall be separated from access by the public and limited to the area behind the building as identified in Attachment D. 6. Use shall not commence until the building is served by public sewer. Waiver and Modification Requests Request for modification of Section 5.1.11.b Staff recommends the modification of minimum 200 foot setback requirements be approved. Staff recommends approval of this modification, provided that additional soundproofing around the existing windows be provided or for new windows they provide for adequate sound dampening. (Condition #4 above) Waiver to allow alternative location of parking area Staff recommends approval of the waiver, provided that the parking is screened in accordance with the DCD requirements and recommendations of the ARB. ATTACHMENTS A. Location Map -Aerial B. Location Map -Zoning C. Location Map -Crozet Master Plan D. Concept Plan E. Floor Plan of proposed veterinary hospital F. Engineers Report certifying soundproof building G. Albemarle County Service Authority comments, e-mail dated October 24, 2008 from Gary Whelan and memo dated March 12, 2008 from Gary Whelan H. Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority comments, e-mail dated July 14, 2009 from Justin Weiler, E.I.T. I. VDOT comments, e-mail correspondence last dated November 14, 2008 from Joel DeNunzio, P.E., Staff Engineer AN t�j p�d F Attachment A z LL g ■ ■« END ■OR■i. MM-2)MCCE e ❑iI I❑1111t❑ -17 �n Ln Attachment B 4 to c I w 4 ti Q 4 m r C} Uj {q r # I O to I 40 cO r r� � I I N w3 _ 7— O. Qr � Q r OLn 'a O 0 N a �� a. N Attachment B 4 to �Y-4 � 4 r, c I w 4 �Y-4 � 4 r, Attachment C Q . 2 � 3 0, /�/ - ` }i �} ( | | I ƒ LIEN. I/ 0 M 9 0 %!iZ CL / f ■ , � ¥ N r U - ��k� Q § � o OOL 0 � . cm x\ \ m a. cn —� ! � } I � . w � . x e 1 of 46 . s,lretvea ars^-al P;,asy ane rrn v��..y+ ,y-���oa { 1700'*YS+ S o I seta eovenae! ! r s ii i Ac Pr�+e- Gr An�,y wellness Lamer �1 11790 i1�6.6 57 .snopy a7sa iN ascc s.57o oz7 Am.mahaC,—I 1167 li~$Z 119�t Pan,rtgti7r.�.'Nalk! 6,075 Q°5 7,28; 43, YAI 4'! 0 31 y '691 A WANSCGAP�2D- 1110'91 a Openfpra!! 1,_19-_-397 2n127,.1'"] 2q2 + If 0 9 royal 1so.23P 10o Iso 2X. 3a owner 1100 C-0 Ave LLC 1 9.S� a931 972_1+ E,rs,�ng �mparaws c«araga 7% — —_ _ 00 ca.enedyn H 5min �51_ Pmposea Impauous Gassy. 15' Nc Laadacaprty Plan Req'tl M Prelim P O Mo 475 9Ila i�0 1156 " o R Ma,lrnum Slmclum rleynt 20 FI CmSBI, VA 22332 [ U yg 1--1��71 T Paging Type Asphalt Cenlacl Cenral VA 22 S3uiltlers 52 Q- 1 �� 1 L]55 Mea Number olEmplcyees 4 IAntlC1,IWl Henry Smnhel P0Ro,475 1Ih7 9l�2l 11L.Z11;�. Nufn0N 9C8051Y p" 2 / 5 i 45X 1+jY EFW 9LJYS': �1' FTP � r prttrtr ryrk✓-j vry Laj Irtp'+el■or`. Cr— VA22%s asn-az3ssss 7ael A1n - - citlk7Yeetled -+fir 7vP 16 79'1x 580 DO t r�k' eop 1 S, ( � � 4 3 s Tarr Nap&Parcel MP,55a2-017 +w - '92 {. S$U3 5[C•iUv .. - Acreage I www Or rREArmLNT- - - CpaE4TlON FOR STA[ET IwTERSfCrXM�Is NaCl Coh@AROA4 ENTRANCES r f oeee Rook zonmg ss}ye5a oa,�.�lawn erme+ orsrn�r p T fl1�5 11 • 579 a = Magarenal Dsrnct wnnehvl p.sma 0 O"ay obtnnls 7AL 24a warerasewer junsa.Ct­al area wseJ Supply ama D—Icpment A— ,Pit'aO Waiters Requestetl Sebe N Mn Rt 240 Relegaietl ca0 ing Regml 962 f .` L wararsnee �c>, �nyhol. calk, Sl 11?i�S 4y 9 I Datum Een�nman ti�•s vas filaeNw cm,ermcnncrera s�nawalx.nranr or cudsm9 ��y �_,G fii)�96 �I - _ _ : i s a s L Key Ina U f4.i A41 895 ` fS ropognphk Inlar.nal�or, FWd rug. s,L xey Ine 109.3 5&12 IPsrkinq. code Secr'— top a a z / 5 i 45X 1+jY EFW 9LJYS': �1' FTP � r prttrtr ryrk✓-j vry Laj Irtp'+el■or`. Entrance Grading (r=20') Cr— VA22%s asn-az3ssss 7ael A1n - - citlk7Yeetled -+fir 9^5x 16 79'1x 580 DO t r�k' eop 1 S, ( � � I 3 s Tarr Nap&Parcel MP,55a2-017 - '92 {. S$U3 5[C•iUv .. - Acreage 3 45 Acres (Pe, www Or rREArmLNT- - - CpaE4TlON FOR STA[ET IwTERSfCrXM�Is NaCl Coh@AROA4 ENTRANCES r Entrance Grading (r=20') rota[ sps-os R—:-- 3 PaM1 q - i .4 . _ 1 To1e'Spa.,esF+c.w.d= 9 Pab,gecace5 No critical slopes Location Map (no scale) w G are shown on s' Albemarle County x � y GIS mapping for this parcel, s r i ti imp 56A-1-01 7vw+eti. io be 1 a" `I°nfid 3 499 A PM -1,0vtlt 1.c F Cr— VA22%s asn-az3ssss 7ael A1n - - citlk7Yeetled -+fir 9^5x 16 79'1x 580 DO t r�k' eop 1 S, ( � � I 3 s Tarr Nap&Parcel MP,55a2-017 - '92 {. S$U3 F Acreage 3 45 Acres (Pe, Recall saucy) w - oeee Rook zonmg ss}ye5a oa,�.�lawn erme+ orsrn�r p T fl1�5 11 • 579 a = Magarenal Dsrnct wnnehvl p.sma 0 O"ay obtnnls 7AL 24a warerasewer junsa.Ct­al area wseJ Supply ama D—Icpment A— ,Pit'aO Waiters Requestetl Sebe N Mn Rt 240 Relegaietl ca0 ing Regml 962 f .` L wararsnee �c>, �nyhol. calk, Sl 11?i�S 4y 9 I Datum Een�nman ti�•s vas filaeNw cm,ermcnncrera s�nawalx.nranr or cudsm9 ��y �_,G fii)�96 �I - _ _ : i s a s L Key Ina U f4.i A41 895 ` fS ropognphk Inlar.nal�or, FWd rug. s,L xey Ine 109.3 5&12 IPsrkinq. code Secr'— top a a z [gown Crazes oisrnc,} 39� aA.W l etk� a� J kegu,remanrspace per }000 a r rel neor area s t�,�sl ar ,1b63r'� 2 A'QSF� S�1S c — 14 a 6• •� 993 77�Y7 AFI E_• ^Braces- o rdw:wn ` New H L 5.., ,aa= - IF, ,G'.nln conerguous 8 i IS Ln ing X42 �\ // / 7.55 57.55- 37.36A 5761 11 rota[ sps-os R—:-- 3 PaM1 q - i .4 . _ 1 To1e'Spa.,esF+c.w.d= 9 Pab,gecace5 No critical slopes Location Map (no scale) w G are shown on s' Albemarle County x � y GIS mapping for this parcel, s r i ti imp 56A-1-01 7vw+eti. io be 1 a" `I°nfid 3 499 A PM -1,0vtlt 1.c F 'r^y - 7ael A1n - - citlk7Yeetled g� - ur well ( � � , Wt sbm—hl Ix*cLtan F I I f C' �• � f .` L l Sl y, U f4.i A41 1, aA.W l 'wF e4a r ! U 0' Attachment D - i�r. 0' Attachment D Attachment E M"HtdS Z . tvm5 dviLL 1 ft VA jMJ�; , "Alw lain;-) 01 J �7_ ..._.. _.._ •.uw.. em `.rte, a. re x,a i ___ VA w"+xOD' any ie-,uiJ UUGG - - .�_ ���nrs.?ss.�u�7_�rG+.7v�viuiy �lYl v2Y30rr�� bYM1�JJl�t 7b'8t1N3�� i TI )TI -, 1 x Ll ( JC l Mc1Wair ancd �sodales -- �/- Consulting Engineers Re. Acoustic Engineering Inspection Attachment F 109 South Wayne Ave Waynesboro, Virginia 22980 540-942-1161 • FAX: -140-942-1163 • E-MAIL: jmaCbrucheum.com February 15, 2008 The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the results and recommendations from our acoustic engineering inspection of the room in a building located at 1 100 Crozet Avenue in Crozet Virginia, based on the inspection we conducted on Friday, February 15, 2008. The scope of this report is limited to the room closest to the nearest property line that could be designated as the treatment, surgery, and confinement area of the building. The purpose of this space is to treat and confine domestic animals (mostly cats and dogs). Existing Conditions The location is in a long building measuring approximately 24 X 101 feet with three existing entrances. 2. The room used for testing measures approximately 150 square feet and has two 36 X 45 inch windows. It is the closest room to the property line. But it will probably be not be used to contain or treat animals. 3. The room backs to a 10 inch wall made of cinder block (CMU) and covered in dry wall on the inside. The room is adjacent to another about the same size. 4. The property line is approximately 49 feet behind the structure and is marked with a fence. Testing Conditions A Realistic sound level meter (VAT. NO 33-2050) was used to perform the control and audio level testing on the site. 2. We determined that the loudest sounds would come from a dog's barking or howling. The average dog bark measures about 100dB. The loudest bark from the accumulative bark of three dogs is around 150dB. 3. We used several sources including a constant sound source and replicated sounds from samples of dogs barking and a live human simulation. Findings and Recommendations The control was set to the loudest perceived dog bark at around 150dB. From all audio sources tested, the loudest direct signal measured over 160 dB with the decibel meter directly in front of the source. 2. The sound source was placed close to the weakest audio and structural reinforced area (the window). As indicated in Albemarle County code section 5. t.11, we tested the various audio signals at the property line (approximately 49 feet from the building where the window is located.) We were not able to produce levels higher than 52 dB, notably quieter than the 55 decibel figure as indicated in paragraph b. 4. As a precaution, we recommend some sound reinforcement around the window if the room is used as a treatment or confinement area. We feel the CMU wall is more than adequate in dampening the sound. Please contact me if you have any questions, Respectfully submitted, Mark Rathke John McNair & Associates Consulting Engineers SP200800009 Animal Wellness Center Attachment G Rebecca Ragsdale From: Gary Whelan [gwhelan@serviceauthority.org) Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:00 PM To: Rebecca Ragsdaie Subject: SP200800009 Animal Wellness Center Attachments: Animal Wellness.doc Rebecca, The ACSA has no additional comments. RWSA will have to be notified of the applicant's intent to connect to their manhole. I'll attach our previous comments. gmw <<...>> 8/10/2009 Mende ty Service Authority TO: Rebecca Ragsdale FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: March 12, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Animal Wellness Center SP200800009 TM 56A2-1-7 The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. An 6 inch water line is located approximately 270' distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4. A 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 210' distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently Under review. 8. and plans have been received and approved. 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may/may not be signed. X 12. RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: They don't appear to be a customer. RWSA will have to notified of any activity within their easements. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands ="i=Spotnap Rom • iarlottesv !'- • 22911 • 7-1 1434577.4511 • Fax (434) 979-0698 wv✓ta.G,.�,.,,reauthor�y. _=, Attachment H Rebecca Ragsdale From: Justin Weiler Uwei#er@rivanna.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:02 PM To: henry@centralvirginiabuilde(s.com Cc: Michelle S. Simpson, PE; Bill Fritz; Rebecca Ragsdale; 'Gary Whelan' Subject: Animal Wellness Sewer Connection Henry, I spoke with our Chief Engineer this morning regarding your desire to connect to RWSA's manhole to provide sewer service to the proposed Animal Wellness center in Crozet. Since this is a proposed development and there is an Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) sewer that you can connect to on your property, RWSA is maintaining its position that you should connect to the ACSA sewer. As noted in yesterday's meeting, the connection should be at feast 10' away from the RWSA manhole. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Justin Justin Sterling Weiler, EIT. Civil Engineer Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority 695 Moores Creek ?_ane Charlottesville, VA 22902 Phone 434.977 2970 ext 206 Fax 434 2951146 8/10/2009 Animal Wellness Center - Hillary Cook SP -2008-00009 Rebecca Ragsdale From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. [Joel.Denunzio@VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 1:39 PM To: Rebecca Ragsdale Subject: FW: Animal Wellness Center - Hillary Cook SP -2008-00009 Rebecca, Attachment I I have reviewed the above SP and it appears that VDOT's comments have been addressed. Please let the applicant know that any proposed work within the VDOT Right of Way will require a Land Use Permit. Thanks Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434-293-0011 Ext. 120 joeI-den unzio4vdot.virginia.gov From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:17 AM To: 'Rebecca Ragsdale' Subject: RE: Animal Wellness Center - Hillary Cook SP -2008-00009 Rebecca, I have reviewed the plan and have the following comments: • The layout appears to be In accordance with the requirements that VDOT stated on a site visit this past February. • The site plan needs to show sight distance along S.R. 240 and adequate dimensions in accordance with The Minimum Standards for Entrances to State Highways. • The site plan needs to include a profile in accordance with the CG -11 standard entrance design in the VDOT Road Design Manual. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434-293-0011 Ext. 120 joel.denunzio@vdot.virginia.gov 8/10/2009 Animal Wellness Center - Hillary Cook SP -2008-00009 Page 2 of 2 From: Rebecca Ragsdale [mailto:rragsdale@albemarle.org] Sent. Monday, June 02, 2008 12:19 PM To: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. Subject: RE: Animal Wellness Center - Hillary Cook SP -2008-00009 Joel - They submitted a concept plan that reflects these comments. I sent it over for you to review a few weeks ago Do you have any comments? Please let me know. Thanks! -Rebecca Rebeeca K-ag 3daIu, Senios- Plzen ner J3c'a1n111114'Tlf (4'0011111111)4} 110'[:10111T]eT11 ,101 ?41r'llliiina Ro{kit (4341 3-439 I:-n1at1: r1':� .Lilt ill)r'i1LJ1fII,.oI'J From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. [mailto:Joel.Denunzio@VDOT,virginia.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:21 PM To: Rebecca Ragsdale Subject: Animal Wellness Center - Hillary Cook SP -2008-00009 Animal Wellness Center - Hillary Cook SP -2008-00009 Rebecca, We evaluated the entrance on the above mentioned property to determine if it was suitable for commercial entrance standards at the request of the applicant in mid February. We found that the location and condition of the existing entrance is not adequate and needs to me relocated to the southern most property line of the lot to allow for adequate sight distance. A site plan needs to be submitted with the location and design of the entrance for approval from VDOT and to be permitted to construct a new entrance. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434-293-0011 Ext. 120 joe1.den unzio@v dot. virginia.gov 8/10/2009 Attachment J Special Use Permit Application Supplement Animal Wellness Center How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property? There is no anticipated affect on the adjacent property as sound dampening is achieved with the existing structure according to the sound test performed and within the boundaries zoning law 5.1.1. Although a residencial lot line is approxiamately 49 feet away, a sound test has been performed (see attatched) which proves that sound dampening according to zoning law 5. 1.1 can be achieved at less than 49 feet away. Animals will always be enclosed in the building for day case stay or office visit time. Infrequently, sick animals will be housed overnight. There will be no boarding of well animals in this facility_ How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district(s) surrounding the property? The veterinary clinic will be in harmony with the character of the district (C-1) by increasing client visits to the surrounding businesses. It will help provide oportunities for jobs in balance with available housing in Crozet. The building is scale appropriate. I am remodeling an existing . building - Ho w uilding_ How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance? There will be an entrance to the facility to code_ There will be i S, parking spaces provided following code 4.12.6. The veterinary clinic will create five new jobs for the county and will provide a service to the community. How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district? The veterinary clinic will provide a service to the community. What additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of the zoning ordinance apply to this What additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of the zoning ordinance apply to this use? Although the sound proofed confinement is 49 ft from the surrounding lot line instead of 200 feet, it has been sound tested by Jahn McNair and Associates (see attached documents). The result of the test has proven that the existing structure dampens sound necessary to fit the requirements of the code 5.1.11. Because of this I feel the code requirements should be waived in this instance as it meets the criteria for sound proofing at a shorter distance from the residential lot line. How will this use promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community? As a veterinarian and business owner, I will use my skills and knowledge for the benefit of society, through the protection of animal health, the relief of animal suffering, and the promotion of public health by preventing the spread of zoonotic disease and in doing so make the community safer. There are several separate entrances to avoid animal conflicts. There will be no confined outside animal exercise areas. The water use is through town use, and town sewer is planned for hookup. Animal waste will go through medical waste disposal. Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the number of persons involved in the use, operating hours, and any unique features of the use plan to practice integrative veterinary medicine and surgery for dogs, cats and small exotic patients. Surgery making up less than 25% of the gross and medicine making up 75% of the gross. I do not plan to have more than 5 animals in the building at one time. The practice hours will be from 8am to bpm Monday through Friday and Saturdays gam to 12am. I will not provide after hour emergencies. I plan to employ myself and two other staff members who will be full time, and 2 part-time off site business support staff. I do not plan to see more than fifteen patients daily at one half hour intervals.