The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB201000013 Legacy Document 2010-03-02�� OF AL8 vjRGINZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434).296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 March 4, 2010 Justin Shimp Dominion Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: SUB- 2010 -13 Badger Industrial Building, 2 -Lot= Final Dear Sir: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the subdivision proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Department of Current Development (Engineer- No Objection) Albemarle County Department of Current Development (Planner- Comments) Albemarle County Division of Zoning (Zoning- Pending) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911- No Objection) Albemarle County Division of Inspections (Comments) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue (No Objection) Albemarle County Service Authority (No Objection) Virginia Department of Transportation (Pending) Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District- Soils Report, for your reference Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by March 15, 2010. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Elizabeth M. Marotta, Se for Planner Current Development �F ALB .J$ vIRGIl`�Q' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia .22902 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 9724025 Date: March 4, 2010 To: Justin Sh' p Cc Owner: BMC ldings, Inc. From: zabeth M. Marotta, Senior Planner Re: SUB2010 -13 Badger. Industrial Building, 2 -Lot Final The Zoning and Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department of Community Development will approve the proposed plat referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated bases upon further review.) Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code. 1. [14- 302.A.9] Building sites on proposed lots. COMMENT: Pursuant to determining adequate building site [18 -4.2] staff must confirm adequate parking can be accommodated. Please provide a shared parking agreement to ensure parking will continue to be accommodated. 2. [14- 302B.7] Reservoir watershed. COMMENT: Per this section, provide note that the property is not within a reservoir watershed. While the note on the plat regarding the watershed is correct, the required reservoir watershed note is intended to identify whether a property is in a water supply protection area. 3. [14 -203B] Yards. COMMENT: Provide required yards on the plan. A note will suffice. 4. [14 -306, 317] Private streets information. COMMENT: Label access easement as "New 30' Private Street Easement" and provide required private street maintenance agreement. 5. [14- 303.L, 316] Public sight distance easement, Approval of entrance on public streets. COMMENT: VDOT approval is required 6. [14- 303.N] COMMENT: Provide required private street note, per this section. 7. [14 -303 S] Control Points. COMMENT: Provide control points, as required. This maybe submitted on a separate sheet. 8. [14-418,400] Fire protection, Minimum Lot Requirements. COMMENT: Inspections Division has provided a comment that a.3- hour rated firewall is required-this is a Building Code comment. Staff is still looking into whether the Zoning Ordinance requires this wall must be built before the plat can be signed. We anticipate having an answer for you at the Site Review Committee meeting. 9. [14 -404, 434] Lot location to allow access from lot onto street or driveway, Completion of on -site improvements required prior to plat approval. COMMENT: VDOT is requesting the southwestern entrance onto Route 29 be closed, and, Section 14 -404 also requires that only one entrance may serve the lots. Therefore, before the plat can be approved the entrance must be removed (and inspected to confirm removal). If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to email me at emarotta(c�alben le.org or by phone at 296 -5832 x3432. Application # Project Name Application Type Tax Map Parcel Project Description ITMP Proffer Status All Applications: Review Coordinator Site Inspector Date Assigned Entered By: Andrew Slack on 0211912010 Elizabeth- Marotta Unassigned Reviewer ID Submittal Type Group or Agency Status Received Due Completed Andrew Slack - : Final Plat E911 No Objection ! 02/16/2010 03/01/2010 02/19/2010 1. Document Review Title (Review Documents will also show on the Web) Existing Review Docs s Comments: The box below is meant for short comments. NO OBJECTION. Date Sent r�`,.�.� } 9F 1�1t COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 GREGORY A. WHIRLEY ACTING COMMISSIONER March 1,2010 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments March 0, 2010 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the March 4!h, 2010 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2010 -00006 Mill Creek/ Snow's Garden Center AT &T (Gerald Gatobu) + The existing commercial entrance has adequate sight distance. SUB- 2010 -00013 Badger Industrial Building -Final (Elizabeth Marotta) • The existing entrance to the site meets VDOT standards and has adequate sight distance. The entrance to the south at the taper of the turn lane should be removed. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 - 293 -0011 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Application #: SUB201000013 Short Review Comments Project Name:1 Badger Industrial Building - Final Final Plat Date Completed: 02/19/2010 Reviewer: Andrew Slack E911 . Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION. Date Completed: 02/26/2010 Reviewer: James Barber Fire Rescue Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: Must comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention code. Please ensure fire hydant is located within 400 feet of the building by way of a prepared travel way. Date Completed: 02/17/2010 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status: Requested Changes . Reviews Comments: Based on plat dated January 27, 2010. Indicate on the plat that either a 3 -hour rated firewall exists where the proposed property line bisects the building, or that such a firewall will be provided. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Monday, March 01, 2010 TO: Elizabeth Marotta FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: February 22, 2010 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Badger Industrial Building SUB201000013 TM 32 -5B The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. An 8 inch water line is located approximately on site. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located" distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at.20 psi residual. 4. A 12 inch sewer line is located approximately on site. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently under review. .8. and plans have been received and approved. X 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval -for water and /or sewer connections. -13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Above #6: No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing orfuture easements. The ACSA has no objection to this SUB. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org I�.60N F4WAIWA V-) Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District 706 Forest St, Ste G Charlottesville, VA 22903 975 -0224 February 18, 2010 TO: Elizabeth Marotta Planning Department RE: Soils Report and Comments for: Badger Industrial Bldg iN3VVdo-i3A3o Aiwwwoo 019Z V2; SDJ ►USDA United States Natural Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water �— Department of Resources Conservation District Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Badger (HMQ Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 10 Buncombe loamy sand Description Category: Virginia FOTG Buncombe is a nearly level to gently sloping, very deep, excessively drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loamy sand about 10 inches thick. The surface layer has a low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is frequently flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 5w. The Virginia soil management group is II. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Glenelg is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is U. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit. 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Glenelg is a steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is U. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit. 76 Riverview loam Description Category: Virginia FOTG Riverview is a nearly level to gently sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 12 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is occasionally flooded and is not ponded. The top of the seasonal high water table is at 48 inches. The land capability classification is 2w. The Virginia soil management group is G. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 88 Udorthents, loamy Description Category: Virginia FOTG No description available for Udorthents, loamy. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 2/18/10 Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy. sand Very limited 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes .76 Riverview loam Very limited 88 Udorthents, loamy Not Rated Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand. Very limited . .34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes 76 Riverview loam Very limited 88 Udorthents, loamy Not Rated Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey:. Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand Partially hydric . 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 Not hydric percent slopes 76 Riverview loam Partially hydric 88 Udorthents, loamy Partially hydric Soil Shrink -Swell Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth: 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status.: Published Thomas Jefferson SWCD 2 2/18/10 Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand 1.5 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 1.5 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 1.5 percent slopes 76 Riverview loam 1.5 88 Udorthents, loamy 0 Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand Moderate 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 High 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 High percent slopes 76 Riverview loam Moderate Corrosion Steel - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand Low 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 Low percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 Low percent slopes 76 Riverview loam Low Thomas Jefferson SWCD 3 2/18/10