Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201000045 Variation 2010-06-18• A �'1'l COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 June 18, 2010 Mr. Scott Collins Collins Engineering 800 E. Jefferson Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE:.ZMA 04 -24 Old Trail Village Variation Request dated June 15, 2010 Dear Scott: A variation request was received on June 15, 2010 to reduce the required rear setback for townhouses in all blocks from 15' to 10'. Your variation request is in Attachment A. At this time, the Director of Planning is not comfortable granting a variation to reduce the setback to 10' for all townhouses in all blocks. Also, the table which you submitted doesn't tie the reduction to decks over driveways, which was the substance of the discussion on Monday, June 14, 2010. However, the Director of Planning will grant a variation to the requirement for 15' rear yards in Block 3 Phase B to allow for a deck to be placed over driveways that extends 10' from the right - of- way /easement. Granting of this variation does not affect the proffers for an 18' driveway to accommodate safe off - street parking. Further modifications to the table cannot be made at this time because there is not sufficient information to assess the impacts to all blocks in Old Trail. The Director of Planning has granted the variation because: 1) The variations are consistent with the goals and objectives of the _comprehensive plan. The proposed variation supports the Neighborhood Model in providing a mixture of housing types. 2) The variation does -not increase the approved development density or intensity of development. The density in Block B and density of the entire development will not change. 3) 'The variations do ,not adversely affect the timing and phasing 7of development of any other development in the Zoning district. The variations will not adversely affect the timing and phasing of development or any other development in the zoning district. 4) The variations do not require a special use permit. The variations do not require a special use permit. 5) The variations are in general accord with-the purpose and intent of,the approved rezoning application. The variation allows for flexibility in architectural features without compromising safety and is general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved Old Trail zoning. The variation granted in-this letter applies to SDP2010 -045 for Block 3 Phase B and the illustration of the decks in relation to driveways is in Attachment C. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Elaine K. Echols, AICP Principal Planner Attachment A: Variation Request dated 6 -15 -10 Attachment B: Illustration from Old Trail Block 3 Phase B Site Plan Amendment dated 5 -10 -10 c: Megan Yaniglos, Current Development Stewart Wright, Zoning 2 Application for Variations from .Approved flans, Codes and .Standards of Development DATE: 6/15/10 NAME OF PLANNED DISTRICT: OLD TRAI L VI LLAGE ZMA NUMBER(s): -ZMA -04 -024 Contact Person: SCOTT COLLINS, COLLINS .ENGINEERING / � �Klllw W/ 14 0 Address 800.E. JEFFERSON ST city CHARLOTTESVILLE State VA zip 22902 Daytime Phone 4( 34) ,293 -3719 Fax # 4( 34) 293-3719 E-mail scott @collins - engineering.com What type of change is requested ?: ❑ Variation to the Plan OF Variation to the Code or Standard Provide a copy of the existing plan (may be a reduced copy) illustrating the area for which the change is requested. Provide a graphic representation of the requested change. Describe the variation being sought (may attach separate sheets): Variation to the yard requirements for Old Trail Village. Revise footnote in table 7 to reduce the required rear setback�for townhouses from 15' to 10. 'The proffers will still require an 18' driveway to accommodate safe off - street parking. This change will allow decks to extend over the rear driveway, providing outdoor living space and opportunities for neighbors to interract. What is the reason for each of the requested variations ?: Old Trail Village is a- traditional neighborhood development with pedestrian - friendly streets and minimal setbacks. The design of development throughout Old Trail is intended to foster a sense of community among residents and facilitate the enjoyment of the natural beauty surrounding them. Allowing decks to extend .beyond the - building setback will provide outdoor living space for units which do not otherwise have usable outdoor living space. County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296 -5832 Fax: (434) 972 -4126 7/24/06 Page 1 of 2 In accordance with § 8.5.5.3 c) of the Zoning Ordinance, in order to grant the variation, the Planning Director must make positive findings under 5 criteria. Please provide information about these criteria for the Director's consideration (may attach separate sheets). 1. Is the variation consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan? yes - the neighborhood model is intended to protect the natural environment and enhance the natural beauty with appropriate design - this variation will provide maximum use of development area, creating outdoor living spaces on residential lots so that other natural areas can remain undisturbed. 2. Does the variation increase the approved development density or intensity of development? No. The level of density proposed is not proposed to change. The decks proposed are located over approved driveways. 3. Does the variation adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the zoning district? This proposed change has no impact on the phasing or timing of any portion of the development of Old Trail Village. 4. Does the variation require a special use permit? The proposed change does not require a special use permit. 5. Is it in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved rezoning application? The streetscapes approved with the original rezoning application will not change. Adequate off - street parking remains the same. The desired mixture of uses and unit types will not change. § 8.5.5.3 VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS, CODES, AND STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT The director of planning and community development may allow a site plan or subdivision plat for a planned development to vary from an approved application plan, standard of development and, also, in the case of a neighborhood model district, a general development plan or code of development, as provided herein: a. The director is authorized to grant a variation from the following provisions of an approved plan, code or standard: 1. Minor variations to yard requirements, maximum structure heights and minimum lot sizes; .2. Changes to the arrangement of buildings and uses shown on the plan, provided that the major elements shown on the plan and their relationships remain the same; 3. Changes to phasing plans; 4. Minor changes to landscape or architectural standards; and 5. Minor variations to street design. d. Any variation not expressly provided for herein may be accomplished by rezoning. 7/24/06 Page 2 of 2 Table 7: Old Trail Village Minimum Setbacks 611512010 Notes: See Architecture and Landscape standards for Spatial Enclosure regulations, which provide additional requirements related to allowable stones. Incidental accessory structures and architectural features shall be subject to setbacks covered by Zoning Ordinance 18- 4.11.1 1 Side yard setbacks of at least 10 ft. shall be provided to ensure adequate fire flow, but may be reduced to the quantities listed if approved by the County Fire Marshal. 2 Distance to garage or carport shall be five (5) feet or sixteen (16) feet or more, but not in between. 3 Rear yard setbacks for townhouses shall be at least ten (10) feet. 4The minimum build -to line in the CT4 and CT5 districts shall be eight (8) feet. The minimum build -to line within the CT3 district shall be five (5) feet. ZMA -04 -024 31 Old Trail Village 01.D,Tit:i11. Minimum Front Setback (ft.) [A] Minimum Side setbacks (ft.) [B] Minimum Rear setback (ft.) [C] d M = Single Family use Multi- family use Mixed Use Non- Residential Use Single Family use Multi- family use Mixed Use Non- Residential Use Single Family use Multi - family use 3 Mixed Use Non- Residential Use I ., ..._ .;nla .. E . . . . 0'... , . 0 .. •., , 0 . n1a , n ' A 4 , 0 nla > . 0 # , 0 . 0 >F,.b K ,<e' L v.--- „..t, O.. :i.' ,...... n;sl -'v. , a %'n^o,..a s 0 ri ..�. „ v`u'.°.•,..'^fi Y "`wS„x �, , - . � : . O 0 . , 0 m£e: e !Ws 9�0 „ ,. K 0 D . .. 5 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 6 n/a 0 0 0 n/a 0 0 0 n/a 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 NOT USED - ,NQTU5ED, 10 £ � - 11 10a 5 5 ru: 5s r 7.5 0„ 0<s 0 15 2 7:s.5 o ;« 2 J0 4£ A •: x 4 13 10 5 5 5 7.51 0 0 0 152 5 5 5 14 10 5 5 5 7.51 0 0 0 152 5 5 5 15 10 5 5 5 7.5' 0 0 0 152 5 5 5 16 10 5 5 5 7.51 0 0 0 152 5 5 5 05 5 5 5 , 5 - >9 15... a,svz ..,.: un a 1. 0 W, n /a",..M, .. nN /a 1,5 n5la„� ... > 10 s � £ �W�� E k n i ` m 'w �'a”. . am z8 ' 4M , 4 Y r r 21. 10 5 5 5 7.5 0 0 0 152 5 5 5 22 10 5 5 5 7.5' 0 0 0 152 5 5 5 23 10 5 5 5 7.5 0 0 0 152 5 5 5 24 15 n/a n/a 15 10 n/a n/a 10 152 n/a n/a 15 nna .. . >< n /a., ... .: 1.5. , Rx Q 10„ n/are n /a. r 10 15? n /a,., n/a 1A, ?s 10 .a 5 .. .., .,,., .. .:. 5 , ,;w =. F .. 5^ E> ,7,5 .� rc. .. r 0 0, _ ..mob„ e .. .<. .N=: .a :: 0, 15 - - 5. 5 5, , >?7 � ..- 10 =mss_ b=� �`��, 5 `£. 5_ Ax . : 575 b. �0 a HOB �y� 0 15 5 5 5 29 10 5 5 5 7.5 0 0 0 15 2 5 5 5 30 15 n/a n/a n/a 10 0 0 n/a 15 2 n/a n/a n/a 31 15 n/a n/a n/a 10 0 0 n/a 15 2 n/a n/a n/a 32 10 5 n/a n/a 7.5 0 n/a n/a 15 2 5 n/a n/a 33 15= n >(Os,n 0 M;n /a,,, ,.. 15z 34 15 ,,, F =n /a n /ate. z n /a, .10. x0, .. Qr r n/a 15. Z y n •35 1,5 h n(ak� �;;Lhla' ��.���t,n /a r %ate Notes: See Architecture and Landscape standards for Spatial Enclosure regulations, which provide additional requirements related to allowable stones. Incidental accessory structures and architectural features shall be subject to setbacks covered by Zoning Ordinance 18- 4.11.1 1 Side yard setbacks of at least 10 ft. shall be provided to ensure adequate fire flow, but may be reduced to the quantities listed if approved by the County Fire Marshal. 2 Distance to garage or carport shall be five (5) feet or sixteen (16) feet or more, but not in between. 3 Rear yard setbacks for townhouses shall be at least ten (10) feet. 4The minimum build -to line in the CT4 and CT5 districts shall be eight (8) feet. The minimum build -to line within the CT3 district shall be five (5) feet. ZMA -04 -024 31 Old Trail Village 01.D,Tit:i11. i d r : • >.:: I ROPOSED 6' PLANTING STRIP & SIDEWALK AS SHOWN AND DETAILED IN THE APPROVED "OLD TRAIL VILLAGE i \ PHASE 6 BLOCK 3 PHASE A SITE PLAN" t V s 'DATED 618108" 78 � ` ) '� v \'' � \ - _ _ - PROP_OSEp CLAREMONT LANE APPR VDO \ s \ \ - BLOCK 3 PHASE A SITE PLANV A CG PROPOSED VARIABI �j -EXISTING! ..:::...... P � \\ •., EWER o :•.::: 51R/W \ \ STRANSIN :: ?: �r::d {.. 6' - :.::1T: \ .....'::.'::.•.' 400-.':. '.:::':- 7 D R ::iaf: �..... 14' s \ EXTE AC S i ::::'::•::::::::' :' :::::::::::.. •.._ \ \.. TIE -IN PRIb CLAREMOt SE , INTERSEC ACCESS TI %i:;.:• ......... ... Ok . ::::::::'- i- :::��::-:':•::•:::: O \ � •�" / _ \\ .:- � 5 , 1 .... ............ \ :i AREA OF SIGHT \ s ............. ........... . ....... ... \ o °:: \ : :.:.'.14'i`;:.. ACCESS \ \ EASEMENT ...... T;t�: ^ii }:: : "C�' -,'. 6� }� "• \ \ �• �\ �\ EASEMENT _ .. -: :`.�'/ VDO 2'':..:: STD �p \ 1 15' REAR YARD CG -12 ^^ \ 1 :: '•a \ pfF g \ i C'-12 SETBACK STREET �.. �:. - DECK P. -CV v� � i �.- :.::::.�..• SIGN . '' �i;:•::2�' . \ \ ZV ACCESS t EASEMENT ::-:- '�'�: : :::':I::. ":'.::::.- '9� � is / ii ?` ?iii5:i:f2j ..::iii::rE:i•�.'�:ir:iii:i:i -: Lv �.�� STOP: \ 1�GI�AVEL ;' ti4::: ?::'::{ :•.'::::. ?:::; ::',` ( Val <O ORDER - i z . ........:..... G SIGN STOP_ .�. ::•: ::::..... �p - - - - - - - - - - - - - -SIGN `141`�P� VDOT \� TV� .1. • 0..'. ,.,:: r:. /ry PROPOSED 5' X00 ` \ ` (TYP) / < x6g• CONCRETE SIW � 1 `' - \ :. 2fi'a :; o%o�• fors Old !',, block -3 � ACCESS a FUTURE DEVELOPMENT � I i LL 8' ^'a EASEMENT 6. ' :ONC NV 15' REAR YARD ` SETBACK "8 CONCRETE IDEWALK PI: 12 +14.13 ♦ � �. � - � �' ' � ' cry nnr � / � •<Z