HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP200900034 Staff Report 2010-10-05COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
Project Name: SP 2009 -34 Re -Store 'N Station
Staff: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner; Glenn
Brooks, County Engineer
Planning Commission Public Hearing: June 8,
Board of Supervisors Public Hearing: TBD
2010
Owners: Jeffries 11, LLC
Applicant: to Higgins
Special Use Permit for: Uses permitted by right,
not served by public water, involving water
consumption exceeding four hundred (400)
gallons per site acre per day. (Sec. 18- 24.2.2.13]
TMP: Tax Map 556 Parcel 1
Existing Zoning and By right use: HC- Highway
Location: US 250 (Rockfish Gap Turnpike)
Commercial; EC - Entrance Corridor Overlay
approximately 1,600 feet (0.3 miles) west of
Western Albemarle High School.
Magisterial District: Whitehall
Conditions: Yes
Requested # of Dwelling Units: N/A
DA RA X
Proposal: Use of more than 400 gallons of
Comprehensive Plan Designation: RA - Rural
groundwater per site -acre per day for
Area in Rural Area 3
convenience store.
Character of Property: The site is currently
Use of Surrounding Properties: Surrounding
vacant.
properties include the Crozet Moose Lodge,
single- family residential, and various commercial
enterprises, including convenience stares with
gas stations.
Factors Favorable:
Factors Unfavorable:
1. Character of the zoning district
1. There is not enough data to
will not be changed by the
determine if the existing water
proposed use.
supply is adequate to support
2. Granting the special use permit
water consumption in excess of
will allow a proposed
400 gallons per site -acre per
development that directly
day on this parcel.
promotes the purpose and
intent of the HC- Highway
Commercial zoning district.
3. The proposed water
consumption will not adversely
affect uses permitted by right in
the HC- Highway Commercial
zoning district.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of 5P 2008- 00033, with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall install a meter on the well head to monitor water consumption. Prior to
installation, the model of said meter will be approved by the Zoning Administrator. Results
of daily water consumption monitoring results will be made available within forty -eight (48)
hours of a request from the Zoning Administrator; and,
2. Water consumption shall be restricted to 1,525 gallons per day.
STAFF: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner; Glenn Brooks, County Engineer
PLANNING COMMISSION: June 8, 2010
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: TBD
PROJECT: SP2009 -34 Re -Store `N Station
Petition:
PROPOSED: Use of more than 400 gallons of groundwater per site -acre per day for gas station and
convenience store.
ZONING CATEGORY /GENERAL USAGE: HC- Highway Commercial: retail sales and service uses; and
residential use by special use permit (15 units/ acre); EC- Entrance Corridor Overlay: to protect properties
of historic, architectural or cultural significance from visual impacts of development along routes of
tourist access.
SECTION: 18- 24.2.2.13: Uses permitted by right, not served by public water, involving water consumption
exceeding four hundred ;400) gallons per site acre per day.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USEJDENSITY: Rural Area in Rural Area 3 - preserve and protect
agricultural, forestal, open space, and natural, historic and scenic resources/ density (.5 unit/ acre in
development lots).
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes.
LOCATION: US 250 (Rockfish Gap Turnpike) approximately 1,600 feet (0.3 miles) west of Western
Albemarle High School.
TAX MAP/PARCEL: Tax Map 55B Parcel 1
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Whitehall
Character of the Area:
The immediate surrounding properties include commercial uses, the Crozet Moose Lodge, and single -
family residential properties,
Specifics of the Proposal:
Section 18- 24.2.2.13 of the Zoning Ordinance requires uses in the HC- Highway Commercial zoning
district not served by public water to obtain a special use permit if they use more than 400 gallons per
site -acre per day. As it cannot be determined that the proposed gas station and convenience store will
not use less than 400 gallons of water per site -acre per day, this requirement must be met.
This request is only for the water usage, and not for the store use —the stare itself is a by -right use in
the HC zoning district.
Planning and Zoning History_
SDP2008 -154: Request for preliminary site plan approval to construct a 5,750 square foot, two (Z)
story commercial building with gas pumps and associated parking 4.06 acres. Application includes a
request to waive restrictions found in Sec. 18- 21.7(c) in order to allow for land disturbance in a
required twenty [20) foot buffer area. To be reviewed and acted upon following the Planning
Commission taking action an this special use permit application.
Conformity with the comprehensive Plan:
The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Rural Areas, emphasizing the preservation and
protection of agricultural, forestal, open space, and natural, historic and scenic resources.
The character of the area is unusual, as it contains HI -Heavy Industrial, HC- Highway Commercial, NMD-
Neighborhood Model District, R1 -Low density single- family residential, and RA -Rural Areas zoning all
within one -half of a mile (Attachment A). All these areas are designated as Rural Area in the
Comprehensive Plan (Attachment 13).
Zoning of this parcel is HC- Highway Commercial. The proposed use (convenience store with gas station)
is by -right in this district.
STAFF COMMENT:
It is understood a site plan will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable Ordinance
requirements should this special use permit application be approved. The Planning Commission
is required to review the submitted preliminary site plan because an abutting owner has
requested such a review in accord with Sec. 18- 32.4.2.5(c). Submitted site plan drawings are
included in this report for informational and reference purposes only {Attachment Q
In conjunction with other information submitted by the applicant, staff has reviewed the Tier III
Groundwater Study prepared by a Professional Geologist, certified by the State Board of
Geology. It is staff's opinion that the processes used to prepare the Groundwater Study are
sound.
Section 18 - 31.6.1 of the Code of Albemarle requires that Special Use Permits be assessed as
follows:
31.6.1: Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the
board of supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property,
After reviewing data submitted by the applicant (Attachment D), the County Engineer states the
proposed, or projected, water use on this parcel is acceptable from an engineering standpoint.
Additionally, the area in which the parcel is located is not known for groundwater well failure.
However, there is not sufficient data to ensure future groundwater well failure will not occur in the
area.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby and
The character in terms of established by right usage of the area will not change as this property has
been zoned HC- Highway Commercial since the adoption of the current zoning ordinance.
that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance,
The purpose of the HC- Highway Commercial zoning district, as stated in the ordinance, is to permit
development of commercial establishments, other than shopping centers, primarily oriented to
highway locations rather than to central business concentrations. The intent of this district is stated as
limiting sprawling strip commercial development by providing sites with adequate frontage and depth
to permit Controlled access to public streets.
The proposed use, water consumption, does not directly promote the purpose of the HC- Highway
Commercial zoning district; however, water consumption in excess of 400 gallons per site -acre per day
is allowed by special permit in the district. Given that allowing such water consumption would support
a use that directly promotes the purpose and intent of the assigned zoning district, the special use
Permit is consistent with the purpose and intent of the ordinance.
with the uses permitted by right in the district,
Water withdraw in excess of 400 gallons per site -acre per day wouid not adversely affect the by right
uses in the HC- Highway Commercial district.
with additional regulations provided in section 5, and
Section 5.0 contains no additional regulations regarding water usage.
with the public health, safety and general welfare.
The public health, safety, and general welfare of the community are protected through the special use
permit process which assures that the proposed use is appropriate in the location requested.
As previously addressed, concern has been expressed in relation to the question of whether or not the
existing water supply can support water consumption in excess of 400 gallons per site -acre per day on
this parcel.
The applicant has submitted information from a state certified geologist indicating adequate water
supply is available. A study submitted by a member of the public, also a state certified geologist, raises
questions regarding the adequacy of the water supply.
The applicant states water usage will not exceed 1,625 gallons per day. Staff proposes a condition
capping water consumption at 1,625 gallons per day, which translates to 400.25 gallons per site acre,
per day. By -right water consumption for this parcel is 400 gallons per site acre, per day. Based on the
analysis of the available information, it is staff's opinion that the minor increase in water consumption
is not inconsistent with public health, safety, and general welfare.
SUMMARY:
Staff has identified the following factor favorable to this application:
1. Character of the toning district will not be changed by the proposed use.
2. Granting the special use permit will allow a proposed development that directly promotes
the purpose and intent of the HC- Highway Commercial zoning district.
3. The proposed water consumption will not adversely affect uses permitted by right in the
HC- Highway Commercial zoning district.
Staff has identified the following factor unfavorable to this application:
1. There is not enough data to determine if the existing water supply is adequate to support
water consumption in excess of 400 gallons per site -acre per day on this parcel.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Based on the findings contained in this staff report, staff recommends approval of SP2009 -34 Re -Store
'N Station, with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall install a meter on the well head to monitor water consumption. Prior to
installation, the model of said meter will be approved by the Zoning Administrator. Results of
daily water consumption monitoring results will be made available within forty -eight (48) hours
of a request from the zoning Administrator; and,
2. Water consumption shall be restricted to 1,625 gallons per day.
4
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Location Map with zoning districts
Attachment 8 - Location Map with Comprehensive Plan designations
Attachment C - Submitted site plan drawings
Attachment D -- Information submitted in junction with special use permit application
Attachment E - Memo from County Attorney in reference to review of special use permit
Attachment F - Tier III Groundwater Study
Attachment G - Additional information submitted by the applicant.
Attachment H - Additional Information submitted by the public.
F
v ONE IRS■■- E■■ME ■■gMOM
5 i t r l
Eq I I I ❑❑ I I l I i ■077
T to
In
a 11 m' La
wlj
�C
O
N
r
Q
C4
0.
.M
iN
x
F
di
V7
qr
I
w
u-s
v.
yr'
G
m
m
a
n P.
p r
N �
o.
o .�r�i
Ln
Ln
u
p-
x
may ^•
ii •
a
� r
G Q
rn
�r
a
m n
L
In
m m Co w
In �; In
In n �
In
0
i¢ r
r+ �
00
0
m �
a +n
r
u�
t-
r
Y7
V7
fa � r •
r
d
eo
0
Q
m
0
N
r_
u7
n
g:ri v l '�
Attachment A
lraaw V811b
Ch 0
w %o WJ G i w
4 W S71
3 4L 4A
IL ou"
i N j i
p m th
N
i
IL
'- : W
� � Q
a ow
fit
a
IN
s
Ch N
U
W
A
N
�pNp
s
N
[7
t
❑C
G
)y
i
-4h
w
b
t
i
❑o■■ + l l l l ❑❑ ! l❑
f[ I E e r i
mom
r � �
fill,;
i
�
m
C
V
N
N
N
N
N
C7i
tN
w
QI
d.
c
V
/
N
Ch
�
i
0
j
i
i
ao
i
►W
a
A
�
w
�
a
m_
w
N
U
U
�h
N
�{1
i
Vh
.
a
y
SUT
fp.
s
N
[7
t
❑C
G
)y
i
-4h
w
b
t
i
❑o■■ + l l l l ❑❑ ! l❑
f[ I E e r i
mom
r � �
fill,;
i
r
a� l �etT rl �I � t• t,
,�ra I �N I �r..I • sl b, � re ,�. � � � ' .� r;.:+ � .yl ° �} �.III . �; ;I I .r . I � c, qr..
ALE3EP'IAR1_E GOUNT"r, VIRI6IN/\
Tlz\X MAP 55E31 FARGIL
cGt obor 151 200
PRELIMINARY SITS PLAN APPLIGATION
(SDP 200Yi- 00154)
INDEX OF SHEET5
rmAk4imC +ip.
SNEpT Np.
T1TLE
G-'
V OF 12
LOYET2 5HM
COJKTY. STATZ
2 pF I2
MOT15
L-3
3 Or 12
VVS11145 Gr&VITION5 1 C*40LMCYN PLAW
G-+
4 OF 12
RTE 250 - EN7'RAIYAE PLAN
Cl5
5 Ck' 12
SrW LAYOUT PLAN
G-b
b OF Q
GVAVIN. PLAN
Cr7
-1 OF I2
SEPTIC, 1 LrILITY PLAN
C-6
b OP 12
0 K'NStON PLAN
G-'4
4 OF 12
DE1•AIt SIWY
[SIC)
10 OF 12
LANOS4.APIKW5TTE L15k MNG PLAN
4-11
11 OF 11
FHOTOMETF.IG PLAN
G-12
12 OF 12
PHOTOMMT C. PLAN )..T.0.1L5
DEPARTMENT OP WMMUNIT r DEVELOPMENT
R ANNrW/0N I WS
EN6INEE'R
EIALC?1NG OPFIGIAL
ARCHITFL -VRAL RT<y1Ey1 60AP-V
OATF
PATE
PATE
VATS
DATE
ALELPLAA -E GflVNTY 5MVIC..E AUTHORl7
DATF.
VI461NIA LJ- PARTTS@1T OF TRAN5PvRTATf0N
PATE
VIGIN TY MAP
ALF, I"= 2000'
SITE DA-1 A:
OyPEr+JAPI'L K-AW
�+7L PUC1R`.�S
EN6 NMR
loTFR1E$ 11 "
P.G. Sol: 410
Gpoz -_-r• W, 73492
{F--, r{:( m57 AI IL11'1
61'° R41%-CFISO CIAP nRYKKE
LiapZE1• VA 22'1'k7
UP EFi5ihttxl1U
61Bv IYr( FARM GR1vB
LMAIL.GI- CSVILLE VA 72HOI
TF1iPF1Q�E - f43gj 7'dl -73tlT
5CAAaLE Of EWVE r.
RYX-,F.R r1 RAY i A550'.AYES HG
rNO
a?
RDGFR A RAY i A55OGIA -M
PATLM 11: Lozv -Er.
YY F� a
COJKTY. STATZ
V,LIB4ARLE C4911TY, VP
A
y}I17E HALL
IAX MVP RER.'RENCE.
SITE ~lam
YOI4NE
W- H6404AY - C019•GRGAL
If
PROW -
by
pA RgrKS, !D'
V �M
;-j-AR .
aulLP[X6, 50"
PMtl -th1S� 20"(V!ID15TWOED DYTE1
,T T' (AVJAftkT TC- KA b7,: N&J -
SITE DA-1 A:
OyPEr+JAPI'L K-AW
�+7L PUC1R`.�S
EN6 NMR
loTFR1E$ 11 "
P.G. Sol: 410
Gpoz -_-r• W, 73492
{F--, r{:( m57 AI IL11'1
61'° R41%-CFISO CIAP nRYKKE
LiapZE1• VA 22'1'k7
UP EFi5ihttxl1U
61Bv IYr( FARM GR1vB
LMAIL.GI- CSVILLE VA 72HOI
TF1iPF1Q�E - f43gj 7'dl -73tlT
5CAAaLE Of EWVE r.
RYX-,F.R r1 RAY i A550'.AYES HG
rNO
5OLRGE OF F�YGRAPKY.
RDGFR A RAY i A55OGIA -M
PATLM 11: Lozv -Er.
NAVE] "
COJKTY. STATZ
V,LIB4ARLE C4911TY, VP
K6&15npIZLAL MSTRIGT.
y}I17E HALL
IAX MVP RER.'RENCE.
t]6 - I
YOI4NE
W- H6404AY - C019•GRGAL
5E7eAr.K R{pUVRFT•�
PROW -
pA RgrKS, !D'
;-j-AR .
aulLP[X6, 50"
PMtl -th1S� 20"(V!ID15TWOED DYTE1
,T T' (AVJAftkT TC- KA b7,: N&J -
MI;plHt;l 50'
PARK P*. 70' f111 *TLkF= 13 TER
E/ST 510E TAIm -V.CE rr 70 ML 2CJH1115i
Cr
PARKIMPi jvr
E 15TW& V5E5.
7/AE.ANT
PR- 'aPCf�E17 L:LXa.
LdMME7.�.1AVL f64is STATION i L x-.rlE LWlE 5TOF-U -1
�rgres.a ro► f+'r.. ra Ip !c mr +ob ...n.axa� ,*oge..r .ae� . ^wrr¢taa m tlro Ibv-
I+l� n..lF'r¢ in sp+rti �.'�e �CII to Iw 4+�9Wa b •��+ W Lbw wdr]
Y➢H � Orpvx. �!�! WyILYC}lra. PsttR Ip IP��1 wee� � i IA Xk71 !R yryp �p
L,v4: L15E _CJlEPU -.
pARKl HS SLFlnm E.
r+AllFR RE-` LE PREA•
F LC-CCf -LA I K-
KAM" MALD1% Fr"t-
516Nh6E
FHA OYEE5
EI AJ rims 4,750ADO °.Atl PTI2GE %J
PAyES7 fnR AR.AVLLJ 6D27, J5 52 FY.'34.CX W
CeEN 5PACE 111. .46 5iC Pf (6526 %)
TOTAL. h7E7R6y7 Sa FT 140E A. J
KLGUtRJEL PAPXV4C
RETAAL VW t-7 CMF - ICrENYFMD
PIRyT 5{TC0 65F
4 T5C) Cr5F x OGO e l SIPAtElICQ 6Ef = 56 SPALCS
DICE [PARTIAL b�j FLOOR)
IQGO GSf a 0br, a 15YAC,E?200 6SP = A SPACA 5
TOTAL PAFOCIP46 RZMIRW F(JXt TH15 51TE + 96 - 4 , 42 54'AGE5
TOTAL PARKI45 SPACE MjWIOED • 4J 5PAC.E5 A 5 K*NPGAP . 44 5PAG1w'
THE 5.1E a. %H1T ilh A YYA•T'ER SkMT PRCUFCTIOH AREA
THE 501@ i6!,- + F" j TIE 5-A VEf , GREEK RE5ERV911i W TVGtSriW
THE S:TE DOES HOT LIP kTFphi A FLe7DOPLA]H
MAKhMi A'ILUING HEI 15 35'
ALL 51CPW Hr• T BE APPROVW 5Y AR5
MAWhIM M*f -'Oz OF EMPLCn EE7 • VO
NP EN& I NEERI NO
660 Ivy Ftu Tr prly®
GhgrI. 5r111a, Vlrginip 22-WI
(434) 551 -T36-7
joll-
7
K___..APSri
W
W
w
a-
zaw
h
Y� Lf-
h
o �D
OxI� X
awv if bAY!
M �
rr anexr
c.w• v.r u.a
rzr
RSA
rAww
W
r1bF
Attachment! C
,FNe A.. C1J TRILWMCM MOTF"5 FOft SUE PLANS
F'rtor tP � CLMrir,fe,Llcrn wlbrM � ex's:ric pi,hllG rtltd -vl -nay,
kc.ludulg c.,rmrraGtu�n :n arkj exlStlnq *vod, a pe-mttia11 ♦x otit.Wh6A srom she Vlrbinlu
Deprrtmert! of I'ra-sportokldn {VOpTJ. This plan 3-a> -r rrsa,i not aCClrataly repecl, the
reauh cements of f permit Yf tare ors al5crepdna es Occvr tYe req laments of
this par nIL
All yayern.
!, All pavr+a, droJirKTaB reiptpG materrlGla and Gar5try[tfdr ine tflddr 5Fid11 Gonfarm LP u,rrexr!
StreaelF u.>•a rmd- :arrlrfrJS of lrre tatty QF Grxlotlesvllle un1Ee55 o'Jie -r.iye rrvted.
s. bvak�r ono sllta ion C4ntrO1 me »urns a all be pr* Idea 1R raccOrdrxice rvltn tyre approved
crr�bn cardrol pin a�a SNeall be Lnstallpp frFar W a'4 cleu'i^Ly arading ar other
corn ryGtldn,
I All 51wESy and d151"tod Lw,lmz are to be ford heel. wvoeia Ord ffvVh , Tina rnpxlw,"
0 lowaple slo;re t_ 2.1 !}sarizar :al�veH.kol1, Wrpre r�pswnpPly vdai le, le--56- slopes
nF 3.1 tr better ore to be! GUrleved,
K. Paved, rip -rop Or st eml�attan r4A ia ma j bed ruiredd Who n, to ttte Gpip Ion of the
kilo Capron$, or the C hexor `g des , It 15 apm
In order FP stai a droIr" charnel.
r. Ali LrtWM comro si;rs Shall conform to sere Virginia manual far VMIForm baffle Control pevrGe5.
Vnlen Otherwl5e rote c; all ccncrvla p1po shah W rsfiFprcad corutrote pIpe - Class III.
s, All ewcavotto n for Lviderg -otma p e krAo- latlon rase Lanais with 05i-IA 5t r:0rd5 For :?w GPn&trwtlPn �FOALru [20 clew, Pt afj,
I. ilto loe.ctlon OF pxlstina uttlltim ae. *ass or along the the uF proposed Mork pre riot
rsecessarlly Shawn an the Flores ad niterre 5horm are only appraxmotey 4o rect.
The anal r7Gtv, 6h7i1 cn h[_ oy n tilt l nl eve Ir. - -rile of rd*..raraurd ik'cst prYj st x ores rib rrs.rs•srru
Zt. Trra eµrltrrtten 5ho!t ve!1 ley Lhe ivLuik,L, of o,I to,wrdarles, bA.clYhas, vegetation trio other pennant site elements.
Trip crrt -polar shall be vW c FbJe far .,attiytq 'M55 U tIL ;TY' I -1]p 552 -'tool prlor to any excavattnn.
2. All corwre[cr ntt7Yl the pub'ilc 1q* Of nag 4ollbe or least 3500 psl.
5, P•Iar •rp "ca.15 Lruc.tlrn, fiw'tros tcx -.0171 Fie td verfN all ex 15" WA"ft any and wkiry the Onion of any efib.reperwtes.
4�tLRAL N01ES
Waem Or meth Fill Is to 12a placed sirup be cleared, grubbad, and salaried of LcpsoK Boll rnolorinls 5401, be free of
ael:rlB, ract9, mcap xrap materlat, v6ae tot lor, ref L9e, 8aet w6ohnld panic ley rnr:f frozen deletsrlws or
o"Ct iorable mate rto is. The rox men art lL to dawroter Shp II be One -halF the :Ift tnlr Knobs, MPxk'.'Urrr partk.le
dL -"Ler mho li km one -half Lae [IFt khk ow ss. Gotimen7r. F1I wake rloI nhoIF be wic losssF!ed soil ma Lar lnl with the
re !red to co,*ort to the soil per4,ty KAOSgo For the Interdled locdtlon. BoGkfill Ord fill
mater Ins, A5TM 7,TZ7, 61aes:F lG aLlon Gr'7, GP, Gvt, GL. 51.1 5F', 5,M., 5G NIth o Maxlmmn ASTH 0491B Ifou Id
Imlt of 35 moxlmvm A—ITH P 43115 plobtlGlr-�yy Irpex of 2 Ono moxrrwm OF 25 meat b7 we t oas"h AEPTM
V Is40 far. 200 &lave, Select material A9TM A 2ABT, _logsrPlcatIon C�K 6P, 5Y1, 5° with a maxlmim of ID
ppeer4ent by rwligt po6sM ASIT, P I14C No 2CO &I9Ye.
lksE eelsecr rwte rid I wxler WI,.dhgs end 5trvct6resh use fl 1 and bac.Q111 material under parwra areas, roods,
t Ida no! ke, aid other comaew and paved &wfacerb; use cowhon FIII maternal For genera, site gra"- Place malerlaI
Fin maximum d' uRs.
Lompoc[ fakers OF FIII to c!5- p:rcfsmt by ASTM V Ou beneath payernen[s and riolks lrckm!2rq Groin that nsaj be used For
futlre consOwtion. In other wryLayeo Ore-as compact to FO percent by A5Ti. D (,?8. IF the density OF the adjacent soil
mora that the dereltu epecltled, then ca meted to a demIt not less than the derislty of the WjixeAl so 11.
Thu biLmctllre EOpt ye=a Lo ae bet alter Flr{. crWln�ga�'Iise Fln� to avoid urywc.esb" rEwpriL
A FhppshedV ro �} l c aria W rig s. starer• iw W. � a manner to oraclude the pgrdltg OF the Nater On the
All slraets O!t -SidC tRb k. riaht_ ar way pre to be p�IyoteN purred Pnd malntolned.
Carew tar lx LO varlF that all u:llltleg Le. water salver. aas, ralmtrlc, to eptwvie, (.oll ate. ore M place prior tG
camtr ualo•r of subbase and/or paving.
Propo°_.Bd unrlNrCq#rGV.)d h 011-ie& .-xr a5 f31eGTrV, to W,oro. GarAe ono ja5, which 5w-yo LM5 fcwrll Lq. Snell b-, Ive ated
with G w%nkwm 5 `at arepormlon Fram putirr, water %-A-K, and 5wttarg Sswar.
WE Pd pGtr!' work h exiethg p ololk. streets must be performed h NO VP4rT cna Albemarra c.cxmbj
strnGre9s and speGFl k.d LGrv5.
:.
To 1w lbS3A Of oe/' tiring! and kraNlo <7[p, there ore rid known g'avesltes ran the suf7ji Gt pr
These plans and prolIIan and a 1 the new caratrmtlor with this plate shod tic in racc.o all w f.�ie r.Jr ^art t47proved
Asrema-ie r,aurlw servlce wVarr_y's iqgeenerol water Cad sower Lorntructlon speclFlraAkxis. any eane� tharttbf and
We sttrm1rds aid sperAw.4ttor5 of vDdT.
riTE RAM NOIL-
All pavhr riratnagr. rnlalad rrpterids and rulstrur.tbrt methods shalt tantcrm La VDOT [xre]rrt spey'rkciFnrrs trio s uuJca ds
? 51hys It[jfrt� b ShCi`r nn trio pttatrirrle'1triC piai.
1. On�lle durcr�sler erclaswe will rrlatcn the proposed gulldhq
F. The IOLC♦fyi i of a r1Y.ina vtllltk9s arxnss or Irrrhqq inn Ira cf` proposed rtrxc a e eat necessarlly storm rm the plara and
>&here show+ axe Only appra.lmatary urrncL. Tice 4antraGLair shad on his awe hMotMa to-eate all rmGergrotesa lines enn
strYLAirei as necessary.
r, Tae cor-.roc:ar ihGll verify L1•a loeertlona of ell t.o,>rkia-les, prl!drws end other pertinent site e'emerds.
.. AI! site drahca"fE Is to be dhvarted into the starmrlder peterltlan Facllltg {rain tank.
f'aveman! maritg color n W be Hnite (except bur rrQrkVgs shale svppement
rhi[e rna-kf�s ear pe:rking space& Far persons wl•.h dlsc6rlf:les}.
FiFHERAL VT11JT* MOTE5
I Cc kpct !7[111[ at (800) 5162- 7L.,'P 48 hours for t0 Dprryy gqlradina 1r dl to i+nrre hf+ON' ULI 1LIe'g marked,
'he Cant rotator Via ll varlft, ali Le lllty Informat Ion pier to user: �r=vciFpn 10 MCI Fie and pros and �-vtc.os to
his ow. SattsfaGtlom
2 AI; s :xlslkn a_Irltics - -lluru, ow this plus Pr,;Ye ta.wn tnkmt srorr ovarlrable, retards. The wnG xtar hw raqurred to dig Last
plt5 kl arWDnn.& OF Lrm rkri9 kr order to am&, mlfw thl- exact location and eievatian cit Lr05ghC &• IF a ronr Ila k5
dtsr.ove,ed, rP:AIFy UP Fncikvoering a-. 43 531 -T3ET. PYkx- to begw-i;nq in5W11Pt1oA a' wtllltles. contractor shall ver#9
reverts o: a.1 cw!rtsctlorn w'Lh extsting uWines prior to purchas" or order" 4" preewt stmCturss.
3. All nrdrant lac.aklons to the Albnmorle 6i%nty I'Fra Marsha! prior to final approval " the coxty and
are tv be Installed cicru� dlrkq to star. lords,
4 At olm5timq Y" rewents tG Tre L711 uL IIItles shall require n pormtt aria shall be performed in oczordanee wttn bia AibenYYle
Gcxty stcrsddrOs and the proj]eect spec41c,0tsons.
5. All storm serer snail be consirvcted in as.Garddnre with V XK T specFFlce is section 302 and section 240 ow as
ssppecped or the arms",
5 The contractor is reejqured to perform all tarts rfw.uired oy the Abamorle Gamty Service A.uthnrity to wcwe
r - captor ce of a:l uil11L e5.
7 A:1 carrreLe u!Led h utnllty r.o•-strvctlar• snail Flee rl7G1p P5t carrrete h dcrardanc® w1LH POT 5paclFlcpt3Pn 5" an JIA
8 No plantrrg5 or erar Linn of other ot-ntnx.tluis yralI lore mace W1 hrl Len, feet of an� Fire "gar ant.
q_ Ail uttl'thes Lo be p nand I,nder erigtra3 trnwtly •,tr Fltlt9 nsrst rya nored or jacked vntess specllicafly approved otherwise
or noted on the aeons,
i0. nor Allltles h5tol.ec uromr roadr alp andlb r tsma FtLy leaned Far Future raaorrtayy, tgGkFtl, shall be comaccted
n not lose Thor. a5% of mnx!nwm argre,lty; h gGGGrry relEh V]G- epeclFlcatlorr+ gectlort5 523.03, 302, 303.10 and 200D2
VIL7 nFM
.L Ale] -rLol. rrc,riaonkol separdlrarr shall bin marr•Larierd wrdr_g e
tires In acc -cl rrc.a with state health depo"Lnent gtarr]prde
-f
I1�
W
Z 2 `t
7- LLJ
Q �
d
l!1 1C
11}
,J)
1 $ 7:
X
on.n.im e. wra
rP 4riecre
nrrrr• e+
M a rite
e.eu� ar wt
errs
alas
oars.
G-3
ear
wcrnn -
20P 12
+err �w
6
W �
W �
ME
Bona
a� E
4 >Q
z
iLl I
un
U)
4 I ?
x
Ix
w
E.E:— �r ,!
rea
ra
E30F rJ
r m
il Gontrockk- to vrrff AcGate oath tunas of 15' GMP ¢or a noorrnent!
Ao� yMwte v e'• 1 Pik "re4omLrt4r t conrrete heGd�j1. F�ROP05ED ROAD 1 �1PROVEMENTS
4i Rek"to ❑U." mv:Wr grovel crlyer.c,y and regIck le ditch to I$' pipe-
- TmK nrr'+er+o. I.e�'M • ,'+co' r .
xwukrr
T DA 9Bmm*
,F�,r'A_ �lt.raill . nhYRl' kA SST Lmr %%,Aw -mem L9rM . LTJLG'
I� VU idF A COF rlS FLGT s, ` ? coDa AZ � Td4• T.. 7conc
ercr� Ir ap K rrml e'
oE. y
4!
CpNSTA11CTItY[ ,otrr otT1rL
Mass,
.... .• o• . r w. w.aa
,...� .5,':'.'
e�."°�.. r'4n` �:"e`.en':1..'.d5°.'."�r �' :wa>�i.�i
ASPHALT PAVEMENT WIDFMING
L— FOR wnoMC MAMCi TO TAWFE
D I MEN51 Oil PL t\N
'^W:MtNT tYrL.; IUN AI_VM1Y7
ZTE 250 70 dE V1 =KIHEV 2" 5M -12.5 surf aces mix
�Y VOOT
3" Hi''5 -25.0 IntAst7nediate Infix
VVM 021A BA5E5TOME
C, M) • AGTM 5lf564ZA E
CBR =10
TO BE FtrLG VERIFIED
P(PIGAL R —Q —W PAVEMENT 5EGTlON
/AI 127r- 7 7i
visur4e Emt = 5exY (45
na CL K W })D A �GKlTtt r
4
aa. sia�+le
rx �•aaA�
`a•
v
4b Mit:r
2d'S?- RA_
—wol
%k.
-
�� _
----- - - - - -- - - - - --
PW7�L' TSd 6,1� ^RLTn3li
1511 V-90prI - -. -
U,5, wzu-rE 270 fill'
,m. �`� _.. �K.. "" .a*R ,�, .�, - �;,. -_. - --
-------- -- --------- '" - - - --
- ' --
t•
_
- =mow++
..'."�'
-- - f:?'^ - - -•,-
il Gontrockk- to vrrff AcGate oath tunas of 15' GMP ¢or a noorrnent!
Ao� yMwte v e'• 1 Pik "re4omLrt4r t conrrete heGd�j1. F�ROP05ED ROAD 1 �1PROVEMENTS
4i Rek"to ❑U." mv:Wr grovel crlyer.c,y and regIck le ditch to I$' pipe-
- TmK nrr'+er+o. I.e�'M • ,'+co' r .
xwukrr
T DA 9Bmm*
,F�,r'A_ �lt.raill . nhYRl' kA SST Lmr %%,Aw -mem L9rM . LTJLG'
I� VU idF A COF rlS FLGT s, ` ? coDa AZ � Td4• T.. 7conc
ercr� Ir ap K rrml e'
oE. y
4!
CpNSTA11CTItY[ ,otrr otT1rL
Mass,
.... .• o• . r w. w.aa
,...� .5,':'.'
e�."°�.. r'4n` �:"e`.en':1..'.d5°.'."�r �' :wa>�i.�i
ASPHALT PAVEMENT WIDFMING
L— FOR wnoMC MAMCi TO TAWFE
D I MEN51 Oil PL t\N
'^W:MtNT tYrL.; IUN AI_VM1Y7
ZTE 250 70 dE V1 =KIHEV 2" 5M -12.5 surf aces mix
�Y VOOT
3" Hi''5 -25.0 IntAst7nediate Infix
VVM 021A BA5E5TOME
C, M) • AGTM 5lf564ZA E
CBR =10
TO BE FtrLG VERIFIED
P(PIGAL R —Q —W PAVEMENT 5EGTlON
/AI 127r- 7 7i
visur4e Emt = 5exY (45
MOTE5 ;=OR THI5 PL.'W
4. 1h& dY'or15 at the entrance dne Fpr InFPrrt1G<an pnty. they tare, not pavement rrlp�"
7. The tl6-In to Rts 25l i�overwrt strxttrs ne 5d5 t0 txt aetarm[r�s by tote 3 In �e HP -� 5ta Asord.
5. The mill" and o..eT'Iay 5twflan In vw t� kwl 5@Ltkxlt rweOdS to be In L1GGR'darie Wlth Not6 4 h thu i'iy -2 �5ta% wat
9RAPH1C SCAU
o se, 100 tta
1# `
w
0
PTIC 7 7
4
`a•
v
v
—wol
MOTE5 ;=OR THI5 PL.'W
4. 1h& dY'or15 at the entrance dne Fpr InFPrrt1G<an pnty. they tare, not pavement rrlp�"
7. The tl6-In to Rts 25l i�overwrt strxttrs ne 5d5 t0 txt aetarm[r�s by tote 3 In �e HP -� 5ta Asord.
5. The mill" and o..eT'Iay 5twflan In vw t� kwl 5@Ltkxlt rweOdS to be In L1GGR'darie Wlth Not6 4 h thu i'iy -2 �5ta% wat
9RAPH1C SCAU
o se, 100 tta
1# `
w
0
If
I
IC' RAF
L� 1 kN
. I
1
1 i
1
i
i J
11 � lI 1
U.S. 0 D'
1 � � Y pran9�eld G
DH G
1 1
lI' 11 1
r '
� 1
z r
-----------------
la- ar]dnlond
Fv4ra IxSpitaln ru.e
ror pqs pay�°� °A�l.
T-M. 555-1
4.06 NCRE5
:EFFRIE5 II LLG
G.B. JIeq-g7
G�. 403 -271 PLAT
I Zoning. Fit
1
------ - - - - --
{{11I
II 1
1
i TAIk 'FU^Irl'
1
H I I
1 ,
P I
I I
DranF�eld
1ILC7M ;
Pto
. la J
1 1
1
� 1
r 1
ULlIF
-APIK7
VON t
prcpoeid I'
r +1
50% F -oserva
-�
7
7 • RTly
.. / 11 1 k 1
Lp
ux
x
f �" f 11 1
IuTGtI ,
11 p 6
i
v- alnfiald A 1
f I I
1 �t
I
f
1
1
H9i•4B'25"H 530.ICWt
OPk"]C XM—E 7-30'
0 3a 60 90
s
x w� v- rw.aa
1
w
z�-1
°9
Q i
,oy
l�
L
LLJ
o [L
l� r
L
a:..�ar pae
� ue�lne
c.ic� n one
xa a+n
qp
°VJr I -•DD'
ILOr
5CF K?
.-- �{_�_ -_ - _�,Y, =�- � -- ���= yr. .�1,� -- ~- •� - -�- - �- - - - - - -- _ -
c,t+la+l, ' ���_ _ -� - _ -- _ _ _ _ _ 64&1__ _ = i�(�� -. - - _ _ • � _ _ . . _ _ _ _
PAINT
----- _ -_ -- -- .... - -- r JFGT' 123-6TLAfiIS f7Y4DECJ�� Yi]rD -7
-- - ---- - -- -- ---`
If &12i Ni FOR TH15 iii
U.ra. iD� - — � rl�ly aG t4 Ili ouea prior
ROUTE 250 0l tc yogr,y-
2. 5,►veyex Ln Ior.Ultl ��e+l1,llp+d ev^rlrx� prior Ec oy slt3 work e.nrnrii.
��-
.. '- .�+cvv 15�.a�. tc�l ..� r � ray b• a5 �r'R�.,�_ ,• , � � '�- � �i + �l
j ""`'"�'pr"g -mow �+:,�� a`°�ra.�n �,. _� �- ,�,P.� -s.�.� � -- '� � .. +1.•. � �v � � 9� Mn ry r � � ,S
E vinrinid G
1 • V' pp
l`j 11
r
1 1 '11 , r _19,
k. i - -L.� •.! i.� -fir!_ ,t!
r I 7.M. -V�i
4.1 AGRE5
ell
+ Zoning:'PIC, A
CRfTIGPcL -r. r 1 � W I'I
SLOB i i
wj
FU
r. L
! i : k � �•' r i� � 1 !i' I�I �'.3 1�I
1 _ +
1 1
1, s -- ^ - -- f!+
J
,1 1 - - - - -_ 1 p
1
n liell�}rll o. lwu.
5a so sa
0
1w
w
Z zJ
<<
u X
�arsiir wn
R tnH,z
w+rc
v. min
sra
r�ra I• -ap'
Ibafe ^r�
S PTICAMILrTY MMES FOR THIS PLAN
I. Kltchari and ssairxy pkrvf2vr} t tx sepwGdadl
2- Srptk NcW4 cre to ire ftl: Led prior to QrcxWiq
9 All site development runoff From W"rv+o6 x'665 to foe drected to the rah terks.
il+I:S • - • •
.r --r . . . . . . . ...... ......
z. F -.
� RR
J awmw rc.
L y FW-
p.n� uL-✓�•
"N TAW
PARKIN-- a?T EX-V = -7Q2' SNIIFF,1
TOP ELEV a 694,0'
SOF7OM ELEV = &&q.'t'
TRAM IC sc,ke .m
"r
r- lanery o. rrue
30 64 90
w
t
!1
� d
w crane
rr �ns�c,s
wY,m�., ore
..s
wKr 1tiBp'
UT
n.rn
—70P la
r■a .■�
r ➢
Yr'r S� .rti:s:
ti
adtl
R VRI
. PARKING LOT
z. F -.
� RR
J awmw rc.
L y FW-
p.n� uL-✓�•
"N TAW
PARKIN-- a?T EX-V = -7Q2' SNIIFF,1
TOP ELEV a 694,0'
SOF7OM ELEV = &&q.'t'
TRAM IC sc,ke .m
"r
r- lanery o. rrue
30 64 90
w
t
!1
� d
w crane
rr �ns�c,s
wY,m�., ore
..s
wKr 1tiBp'
UT
n.rn
—70P la
r■a .■�
I 1
FFR
?' ea TV
� Mwaww
N 1
rll�l
v, NSi{7N11.1 WOTE5 POR. 7HI5 PLAN
1. The arrows rat the ent.•once ere for Irlormatan c6q. They are not pavement mo-kf".
2. the AkYth CF the Bnlrar ei tfrr WA is 42'
3. L wtr rodkrs dirrmr kx- ore to the Fore of curb.
[iNA�HI� SCAI,F
4 30
w
w
z
^r
12'
Tr
w
tnacra
17'
' f"
rte. pC7' 5ir1��511+
IT
v�
i u� sr
wa
�e
nfn
^ nay, A 1'M
60 9Q n cazr- In-a�w
e5l, 12
•ae •v
r 1 r
e � 1
AeMall Ca14 �
1
-
Ij
`�• ��
4 it
I ri� o��:1CXUt Nc!<J]
rF[ • �ca,d7 1
3O
a
�[i_• •� 1 f
FIw
jFF
APB P-pvse� an14
���so .r)
9Ypy}
•' �•.•�
1 �
1
I
r1
r I
v, NSi{7N11.1 WOTE5 POR. 7HI5 PLAN
1. The arrows rat the ent.•once ere for Irlormatan c6q. They are not pavement mo-kf".
2. the AkYth CF the Bnlrar ei tfrr WA is 42'
3. L wtr rodkrs dirrmr kx- ore to the Fore of curb.
[iNA�HI� SCAI,F
4 30
w
w
z
^r
w
tnacra
v�
i u� sr
wa
�e
nfn
^ nay, A 1'M
60 9Q n cazr- In-a�w
e5l, 12
•ae •v
•r
� � ..n r"+ r• r r.csw. u �n• . n�
awe'.: w rr. e.e1>ue..Y
r�e aieu �ro,r
• � W eif2 Pniww�•vV/i�wr WO
1 r�
STANDARD 6" CURB
UNER.AL NO-IE5
! ....a a
S : � OaY[� !ern. . liy,�.i .• ir1 r..l:rO. � rlu]rkx.
�•.. xq Y frlfk fl ►1. [ 'i��ur!v , r f RIpr,1q[{
S R0.[�>s.15O �' W. 4' WYL ■rr� tO�Kt .I•Y
1L[v' v r• u]l11: MifrY[ Con *Y.1CTV+ .rte
r a.��rarars rx; .F : wwi :AM ti.r►a* tr°
�nccv+ �` *`rr `�rr"t s.Y. b rim . •
cor`ra'r�'±Yi••r
` ric wEfGi'�'M9�� c.f ra1 r�+re w wrrlK
e [;.,•:�
m .Ti`i.n�c;l. i.i+`.�'.oc.rio rir.`nxr n+r ums:rr
w rc4 a •rync }ar•e rn[rlW rr r ua•e.: �rryc� swu�.�
Y .v:.le>- de.W •1 ••[ r�S�P� KuM P�r� An r•1`�..Ab
.ea.• n�ra+e a m •w• cr r`ri"..awn. erm"to
lti ru�,ae 11 *+a•
:•aFior a c+:r w,:� a 7
[ .[[.tw¢,n[ r.{ m'.Y Yw• p it �r • �k 6iiie r�nr. Iw�4�
nn[: t.'e��S ,Fr ���iyt%y {[ipl � �-��w •i ].••Mfrwll�nn[�+cr[.
IIL
i TAF
TYPE 4
PERF�I[1n:LL. dF
f`*O- LLL
]PC t
FrrRP W 6 n�riYLrq]I;uLaR
Jv poaec�ev vevnaL
ea eoq nyvo
.. nnv`u:+eovo s
r e e? p C v p r
ppn nta 1
lif,r-
ElC TCC T r1r}_f� N AFI1YVYr
C-G• 12 LSE SECT AE LL wAF,'FJI lC SURFACE
GENE ?& 14C 1 tti
wrn
r �nr Ya. fL wavar �e.•s' «r.. -r
' c 4rT +ac
—OM nr,r�n oro'OLr.�el swi.
C.
a. rt sa« • mrra•nr •,r. r
R x+w
c
f ..ter . •. o ma t>m•,r
rr.rr+
1 •r. cpY�rw uoin.o.r vn ra u1 mr 9
om.rcrw r� uwr, rn.xrcrio-s wa
1
K�1 w
Cr � w
1`ir`ip"i`Y�craa - f r r• f � w nr.�,, ff s - .
r.'- !Mlit "1AT147td s"
--(.RE B OUTT£R n
1M
LEVEL 5PREAD EH
ur
-tom -
i. f
i
`E -• - -..
PFRSPECrivE 'ACW
SYw.� A.f.�[edr�FJ tpm,3�,•l
MM
�'' - 4000 PSI CONCRETE
4" - VDOT #21A 5ASESTONE
'OMPAGTED SuE36rtADE
.:BR =10 TO BE FIELD
VERIFIED BY GOVTRAGTOR
SIDEWALK DETAIL
GonatrilLtlon .Joints to be 6' o.c, 1/4" wide, 1" deep
E>cpan5lan .Joints to be 50' O.G. or le,5s
Light twroom Finish
2" 5M -12.5 surface mix
5" BM -25.0 intermedlate mix
• 4" - VDOT #21A Base stone
GOMPAC-TED SCE36RADE
GBR =10
TO BE FIELD VERIFIED
TYPICAL "L16HT DUTY" PAVEMENT SEGTION
(ALL PARKING 5PAGE5)
2" SM -12.5 surface mix
3" BM -25.0 Intermediate mix
• f 8" - VDOT #21A Base stone
•d •
- Go1/PAGTED SUE56RADE
GBR =10
TO BE FIELD VERIFIED
TYPICAL "HEAV'l' OUT-T-' PAVEMENT SECTION
(ALL TRAVELAAY5)
►" - 4,000 P51 GGi*lGRETE
4" - VDOT #21A BASF-STONE
:OMPAGTED SUBbRADE
:BR =1O TO BE F:-1 ELD
VERIFIED Bl' GONTRAGTOR
DUMPSTER PAD d GONGRETE PAV 6 DETAIL
Gonstructlon joins to be U ox, 1/4' tilde, I" deep
Expansion Joints to be 50' o.G. or less
Llght broom Fsnluh
i
n ti,r.rw u rrn>.
w
w
L\\
V
Q 3}Q
D �Q
1n i Y
uMX
q
ter•
M a�aan
a%� n ow•.
r.r
rnoi
w"• r•xr
wnr
i]F 1�
LANV5GAF'E °LANTING NOTE5
I. the planting logmA shelf be consistent rllth the la"t Shawn or Sheet 11.
2. Plaritlncg shall tae IlmiteC to the period Between 5epiemBer 15 to
NCvember 15, or March 15 to Mo 30. Landscopirv9 shvi be seeded and
planted daring the first period Fivitowing completion of site: development.
3. The lond5eape: plantlru3s sholi follow he planting schedule.
4. The contractor Sholl wOrrant tngt a minfmum or 10O% of ad piant" 5noll
survive for a period of ones year follopgk -R3 planting compiotion,
S. The controctor skull Furnish nurseryqr nun plants corrformi -g to ANSI ZbQ,l,
r+fth healthy root 5s�tems developed by trnn5plunti qq or root pruntrg. Trees
and shrubs shall be well 5hoped, FaI�L tx-onc,ncd, hi 0 Lhy, vlgurou5 stock Free
from dl5etr e. Insects, larvae, and deFects such as knots. sun staid, Injuries,
abrasions and al5figirements.
b, Nimeery stock shod came from a local nursery or be adeapted to Ioeal
grarvirra conditions and be c]vararteed py the nursery as such.
�. T+w wnt,Lwtor shioII rle+On LIie Lara`rjII of routs, sods, SLurE_, okay Iwnpy,
oral other CXLI uP �uVS rrlULerlr115 horrmful to plant growth.
ARB `tOTE5
I. Mechanical equipment shall not be rhsibie From the entrome corridor.
2. All Site p!Untings of trees and 5hrvb5 shall to ollowed to reach, ona be
maintolned at mature height; the topping of trees Is prohibited. Shrubs
and trees shall be pruned minlrnolla and onhj to support the overall healtn
of the plant.
GRAPHic 5CAU I' -3o
30 GO 90
W
LL ii
W
NINNEI
loggia
zU
su
ijl
l-
opwmr.
was
w
nne�e
rr
W"
�r
�
PW
raa•
�cao
riwx
n txi
z"
va ei
OF tZ
�r .x
+ ' 'I
L.JMIKAIRE 5C*iE_%LE
1R
ImN
Les.%
i
r
❑
ll 4 WO" SWAdC -MCA _W-M WN Al T O,! 950•10VT•T CLEAR
{ la'aAl*NI+PN1 I— M-OK-Aw.! `J 4E tr W N 7A4 I" r _
it 106 �Am Im 4aQ
WI
GY'X- �4•h... 6a-nG7 C[ ZMl MT
q�AL RVY'KK
3110
RG 'SL.IO ,
oYa a: 4JM
!G!I k
FC1 k
r,
LJ
Oh. • Lrp ow" AA4 -II&M Flies T4V� A �Ti CLEAR
I. UVW tlb K'�Vq`wCC 7 CSx W4 TF• *,_M
!� 977aG +C.7 4vo
T5A1 MLNF] Z
1 WbvO g) N O-IG& CIEAR MT
MO.= NL/Wly
..Wx"AI ovWICK
96-116
❑
4W a ICAO MO AWL,M"Te P•IF1/N
p+x+lrev ON FVAF ORMK xF
CM eK•nATr ULAR
ta,.v O"Al •Ft M
rTT4bAr "'m? LOO AM
+
]avaa- 310.31 -x- G'ICa CLV r rLAI
NMZLWTAC POOM IL
M 1K
a•�4�
yD�A1
ai- ?I••lN
1
r-I
Go le LAQM s?•'A•r 14 COK:RR UP25
W#W - TMW fJwaP+ UMNAM
G[ A� rN 91 6MAR
C,,,m i t "-M
LM'ATI,ti SRM?7 Im AM
LJ
F~j 1+.b�A'NL
Fab
FORLICWTAL POSMRM
Nerc
t�
LJ
-AP Fill M M OECMT L QV
4 •%a_qr p M � K'FO /F"-
oc 3:0 iNTT 44F.LR
UT L• , r' M rW M .ml, Am
NAB
Da
am
6
^
n 104MA a DPW e a rt
wa4r
QGTIM w 5FC:u,w
� •
aw 211, mn!
+La COMPACT
LUOAAAA lean Ica 2+
1210
lafterim
T,.WAN•_CAW,
V@rT4CAL b0al,4 •
Fa5IT1ak
NNNaD
57ATM71G5
1R
ImN
Les.%
i
r
MN
TR
T
WI
4rNN
�S]a10
3110
RG 'SL.IO ,
x
!G!I k
FC1 k
��a k
I.4,1
L7•I
T5A1 MLNF] Z
p
!no k
96-116
94.4 k
MI
rpl
F'AAV1•G . ^7 at Y
I
Faf k
4W h
M 1K
a•�4�
yD�A1
ai- ?I••lN
1
a -R
o. Te
pAh
k�w
NA+r.
I��a+e+�- +rcF
+
Nerc
ea�TC
oaK
+,�•
NAB
"a1RFAGE SGIEP[LE
4N.w Msia sane
cA1RVr 7x411 ' Y
[101110•~ am 9PN
5SAVWN wo '016
AL& Pp IX -o"^& Ni , A/Q MTW{. 05*4 lap LL,
ALL '07VAKA! LS:YBh . . IfAlujop AT GRAVE
ALL .~,PM AM r_ .v t. Vi"N ATAOM. IrL&WSrAo RLL CWaW � -17W 1AL WN• My FLAT SLAY
LT[ A"• APMt'>Jd'i LATeAM b W MN M M 1%L l MMU IM n! LW W AM YAtD1lG AMT lMMFFIIIRL M S1rAn1i Ae P%C ` 14 • IA+Qlr M4 LW,2j [ TIC CCwp / ,i •o W_ f NO Nw' 4RT • To ALMrTM$E CC[YSr TCA wV4T MP [PFWi
LUMIKAIIE LOGATION5
1R
ImN
Les.%
i
r
MN
TR
T
WI
4rNN
�S]a10
3110
OD
7
C04
47111
4%047
70D
as
7
Lao
-210A
AMMLe
wo
an
V• �
Lal
r0e�
•}10/13
7oa
04
a
PC•1
6arLr
7110:1
3110
oa
6
m
M&D
W".&
ea
ap
OP
CM.'s
7cnvo
Da
am
6
OP
101M
'%)OA•
0o
1210
■
CIO
NNNaD
PN:CU
Pa
Oa
NT
m
K"k-T
wfslb
EW
a10
11
M
~A
+YA1
!La
oa
G
OP
WCdA
+4UX
Yd
OD
a
W
rqua
r•rl+a
m
410
M
m
t'Ff41
_ "
5D
as
d
40
9*2-7
484p
Ga
GG
Y
W
ae7A
4."MA
!a
dD
n
m
go"
A.MA
as
Pa
Y
UP
ON2
-80l
"
oD
R
!o
610041
480"
&0
am
76
D6
impa
AIW7
OD
o10
i
W
GArn
4 Ib
PO
ov
a
w
Ewa
4. A,
eo
am
79
104
OD
1061
FP17a
+ND
-TV,&
101010,
ow
aoa
QD
oa
�
q41
wa,e
7ulAA
�cTa
oa
Y
av1
ocb.?
tau22
2pa
an
sr
COO
IOFIO
4-M&
U4
417
Y
9*"
IM.
46C=
amp
as
7N
PA4
cW2
Re:1'n
3=
<W
9P
10.1
I=
Ca1AG
]=
OD
71
p
A=
4OW2
1 ]J7
104•
sa
M
.7xr
4400
M&
04
'A
06
MA
40,1152
410
010
94
CNi
•611
4"l
=
GA
x
66
444.7
494:N
0t
04
%
a
WMA
""o
no
as
bS
aN
rleea
4wb11
LW
p,4
M
74
06
aN
+r6.Y
4A+u
CID
m
DO
oc
40
oN
nTia
4 Ak
m
00
Y
Pi
me
44"5
e)n
am
42
OF
rM!
4Te10
me
as
s
oN
4r4s
.+rw
1w
00
44
M
sws
+MD
ED
"
Ob
I[>V O9
«101010
GID
as
w
e,►
calls
4tns
1]10
Oa
rT
otr
-as
4'mM
I.to
010
I
fn
^JQ�- Q✓TE�'
jIt b. Ia 4• u L L W w �-7yf
L
■, v w e. s. ee ♦. ■- +• � -. 101 s.a
��
I L `
�
.�-
11 tir•el
Va
V• �
V: •T • "nF
•,
•.
b4 L, Co N ■ • a•.
1T
!V
a t. 7-.i� - + S17Eih3GF1Fa1G w
Txf
SPAM AS A1CtU[n
h, 1• la S. -'. .• -.
G]
C � L• + 410 •• to .e S L• !. - t
G
U + k � -' -• t- 110 t. Ts 1e n -r! -
YT .
w I 7. 90
te
tA tit
m Tx: 1n l he U. ►a 7. y
L
I -1
ea b a � es ra W T,I t>,• P:
FNr
>t�
7
fi7iAPHIC SCALE 1•�3p• K NA:+l.rl a. P.*I.
"W, la. �a
0 30 60 90
Q
I
LU
Q
� d
N R-
U) d dD r
r.no w- pus
Tr rneF -•Ie
1f 4/Fpl'6
r'AFi Tw 4/uN
V FrTT
R60N
''M N•4C
f4nIr1F
F,1
Rat
RffTJti -
IE AMNOAMA LA.-0VrMP--
SITE Llr?HTIW5 NOIT5
WD-
w -:P
LnIA10AVA AACYT.OVT
KAD
7 Lip
4%
►A
KAI)
r
mi-A
=ac.h cnwAdvof- lumirialre &-qLl 13 with a lamp thaL ern'tr, -3POO or more Wticil lumens
shall be 0 RP: I r, uto Ff Im VOPP.'O The spillover of I Igh t inq from lun iinalrO5 Onto pLob I Ic rovC16
ord property In ra5kJantla) ca n4 rural areas zonirg d5-trlr-t5 54all not exceed ores -half
Foot4ondle.
-77-
J.
—0
KACM
... :77
GLE
m=
IE AMNOAMA LA.-0VrMP--
SITE Llr?HTIW5 NOIT5
WD-
w -:P
LnIA10AVA AACYT.OVT
KAD
7 Lip
4%
►A
KAI)
r
mi-A
=ac.h cnwAdvof- lumirialre &-qLl 13 with a lamp thaL ern'tr, -3POO or more Wticil lumens
shall be 0 RP: I r, uto Ff Im VOPP.'O The spillover of I Igh t inq from lun iinalrO5 Onto pLob I Ic rovC16
ord property In ra5kJantla) ca n4 rural areas zonirg d5-trlr-t5 54all not exceed ores -half
Foot4ondle.
-77-
J.
mamme RMEN
�itvlmm "IMMEN
1' 1111 1 "1 go 00 k: 1 00000 Im 00
LM I I I AlIll
MO■MEN
CA
&&MOMWA IAWINWZr 1 —4AW
6" LF6N
- 7-x-- — T
Z
F, OW kk n 1+ " t 40 TI rmn CNIM
I.H
►A
GRAFMC SCALE 1-30,
t4M
0 30 ED 9D 8
it
Z
— Lu
<
mix
(Y <
Ir Mace
Few
WI
C1F 17
ran re.
—0
KACM
mamme RMEN
�itvlmm "IMMEN
1' 1111 1 "1 go 00 k: 1 00000 Im 00
LM I I I AlIll
MO■MEN
CA
&&MOMWA IAWINWZr 1 —4AW
6" LF6N
- 7-x-- — T
Z
F, OW kk n 1+ " t 40 TI rmn CNIM
I.H
►A
GRAFMC SCALE 1-30,
t4M
0 30 ED 9D 8
it
Z
— Lu
<
mix
(Y <
Ir Mace
Few
WI
C1F 17
ran re.
Jo Higgins --- Project Development LLC
IV
RE- STORE'N STATION - REQUEST FOR SUP
FOR : GROUNDWATER USE OVER 400 GALLONS PER SITE -ACRE PER DAY ON
HI GHWAY COMMERCIAL (HC) PROPER TY NO T SER VED B Y PUBLIC WA TER.
A. M0UNT A L L OWED B y . RIGHT ON 4.0 6 ;1CRCS = 7, 5t4 C C.
AMOUNT REQUESTED IS ONE (A) GALLON FOR A TOTAL OF 1.625 GPD.
BACKGROUND: The Re- Store'N Station Preliminary Site plan layout was submitted with
a retail store of 6, 000sf with 1, 000sf office above. A zoning determination was made that a
SUP would be required although data was submitted showing at least 2 similar stores of
5,940 sf. "WaWa" stores, that operate successfully using fess than allowed by right in this
case. Subsequently, the preliminary site plan was revised both to make a significant
reduction (25% which is 1,250sf in the arealsize down to 4, 750sf (Attachment H. The
revised site plan also reflects rearrangement of bldg and canopy locations based upon ARB
input. Information was resubmitted for consideration by the Chief of Zoning. Although the
information submitted was to show that a store of this size and larger can operate using less
than 1,624 gpd, the zoning determination was that a SUP is required. At the present time,
the revised preliminary site plat? has been reviewed by staff, comments provided, and
revisions to address each of these comments has been submitted.
The only other case of a SUP issued under these circumstances is SUP 2008 -033 (SEE
A TTACHMENT B). it was approved by the BDS (12- 03 -08) to allow 7.000 gpd far a
3.200sf store. This equates to 0.3125 gallons per sf of store. This is the premise that was
used to reduce the area of RS from 6, 000sf down to 4, 750sf, At 4, 750sf, this equates to
4, 750sf x 0.3925 gpd or 1,484 gpd plus allowing for the 1, 000sf of office use which is 90 gpd
fora total of 1, 574gpd. This is less than the by -right amount.
Regardless, the requirement for special use is a decision by the Zoning administrator and
this is a mechanism to require monitoring of the groundwater to insure that this use stays
within the amount specified in the SUP. This request is in essence not asking for more
that) the by -right amount but the one (1) gallon gives a basis for the SUP to be valid. Since
the owner of RS has significant experience by operating a successful convenience store
(Brownsville Market) over the past 16 years with an average monthly water usage of approx.
650 gpd, there is no doubt that RS will be well within the by -right amount anyway.
DISCUSSION: Wafer data is attached (A TTACHMENT A — E) covering many similar
locations that are on public water systems so the volume is metered. These locations are
retail with food sales but do not include franchise restaurants such as Wendy's or
McDonalds (they fall under restaurant health department requirementslnspections rather
than food sales which falls under the department of agriculture ruleshnspection). This is to
Provide data to prove that a convenience store can successfully operate well within the by-
right grater allowed for this location. For all stores, the range of average water use is from
2564 Mt. Torrey Rd, Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 — 326- 0334 (fax) 434 — 326 - 0334
:�it;ir�intiert! f]
Jo Higgins — Project Development LLC
r
639 to 1,366 gpd. These locations are located on primary roads with greater traffic volume
than Rockfish Gap Turnpike with one exception and 6 out of 9 stores have 6 to 9 fuel
pumps. The overall average gpd per sgciare foot is 4.27 which is less than the amount
established in the Shadwefl SUP. Most importantly, there are two stores that are 5, 940sf
(WaWa's) that are "new" or recent construction having been built in the !ast 3 vears. T.he
Wa Wa's operate using between 1005 and 1351 gpd. Water usage is completely an
operational detail under the control of the owner. To use water, it requires water fixtures for
water to flow. The metered data on WaWa provides proof that even with 12 sinks including
triple dish wash sink & mop sink, 6 toilets. numerous fountain service dispensers. and
exterior spigots that these two stores use between 1005 to 1351 gpd. These stores are
larger than Re- Store'N Station and use some water for exterior purposes. The storrnwater
design for RS includes rain tanks for storrnwater re -use so RS will not be wasting water on
exterior uses. RS may be used as an example of how to apply environmentally
conservative design and the re -use of storrnwater is an important aspect. Eventhough,
there may be stores out there that use more water during a particular month such as
summer months watering landscaping — this does trot affect the operation of RS which will
re -use storrnwater for this purpose.
We have no data to submit that proves that Re- Store'N Station will need the additional one
(1) gallon that is requested. Since zoning requires the SUP, this one (1) gallon is to provide
a basis for the SUP to be valid. if the water use stays within the by -right amount allowed,
the SUP will have no validity except for monitoring.
There may be convenience stores that use more water than 0.3 gallons per sf. This is
completely an operational issue based upon fixtures instafied and procedures that dictate
water use. All store data must be considered with the understanding that there they have
no regard for water conservation. Finding a store that does exceed this threshold does not
undermine the fact that Re-Store "N Station can and will operate using less than the 1,624
gpd by -right limit on wafer usage. Although there is no exact match to RS, the store data
provided covers other locations all which are located in the growth area on main roads in
either Albemarle, Henrico or York Counties and provide a basis to prove that groundwater
used at this location will be well within the by -right quantity allowed and riot exceed the
ooe(1 ) extra gallon requested
it is our hope that this documentation as presented will suffice to support this request. IF
the volume used never use the 1, 624 gpd, this SUP would not be required except to
establish a basis for monitoring the groundwater. There is no documentation presented to
establish that the water use will be above that requested. The limiting factor on this site is
the septic capacity. Re- Store'N Station has obtained an approved Sewage Disposal System
Construction Permit (1D #:101 -09 -0317) for 1.600 gpd. This includes 1015 gpd for
convenience store use and 90 gpd for office use. (SEE ATTACHMENT G). It should be
2564 Mt. Torrey Rd, Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 -- 326- 0334 (fax) 434 — 326 - 3 2
Jo Higgins — Project Development LLC
f
noted that the 'phase 2" referred to is riot proposed as part of this site plan, it will require a
site plan amendment to expand the building in the future, For ARB purposes only, the
location of the potential expansion is shown and elevations of the building expansion have
been submitted to the ARB. Re- Store'N Station has also received an approved well permit.
A i ier j Groundwater Assessment (dated Oct 3, 2008) was submitted for the anticipated
withdrawal amount of 725 gpd. It was approved by the Groundwater Manager at that time.
This assessment provides the calculation of the groundwater recharge to be 2915 gallons
per day. Therefore, the groundwater available recharge is more than adequate to supply
the proposed withdrawal of 725 gpd that is predicted for RS and also adequate to supply the
increased amount of 1, 625 gpd .
COiVCLUSION: Approval of this SUP will insure compliance that Re -Store N Station will
remain within the "by- right" limit. It is noted on the cover sheet of the site plan - "Well water
is restricted to that (1, 624gpd) limit. Well will be metered to confirm usage. " This monitoring
is to assure compliance with the VDH sewage disposal permit and county zoning
requirements.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Comparison Table - 9 locations, Store A - t
B -- Gas Station Water Usage - 12 month consumption (gallons) - basic data from ACSA on
7 locations and data on 2 locations from HRSD
C - ACSA raw data received 10 - 22- 09 - Stores A - G
D - Analysis of raw data from HRSD emailed 2 -16 - 09 -Store H with attachments - original
email, map showing location, VDDT traffic count info sheet
E - Analysis of raw data from HRSD emailed 2 - 17 - 09 -- Store 1 with attachments -
original email, map showing location, York County assessor info sheet on WaWa, VDDT
traffic count info sheet
F - Planning Commission minutes from SUP 2008 - 00033 and BOS minutes from Dec
3, 2008.
G - VDH - Sewage Disposal System Construction Permit
H - Re- Store'N Station - Revised Preliminary Site Plan
I - WaWa Stores - photos
2564 Mt. Torrey Rd, Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 - 326- 0334 (fax) 434 - 326 - 0334
Page 3
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT LLC
Comparison Table
9 Locations
Store A through I
(1 Page)
ATTACHMENT A
2564 Mt. Torrey Rd Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 - 326 -0334 (fax) 434 - 326 - 0340 Page 1
COMPARISON TABLE
Left /Lowest Water use to Rip-ht/Highest water use
leverage of all 9 stores is 0.27 Gallons per sf per day
Each convenience store uses less than 1,624 gallons per day
;TORE A 2401 Ivy Rd
Staff advised that there was an ice maker and dishwasher
;TORE B Size is 3,169 sf
;TORE G
Size is 2.604 sf - first flr with 1.596 office above
;TORE D Size is 2,719 sf
;TORE E
;TORE F
*TORE G Size is 2,709sf
;TORE H
;TORE 1 842 Merrimac Trail, Williamsburg, Va - York County served by HRSD
ATTACHMENT A
Browns
Ville
BP/Liberl
liberty
Shell
Stop In
Shell
Stop in
Store G
BP
WaWa
Exxon
WaWa
Bellair
Market
Pantops
.ocation
Store C
Store E
Store D
Store B
Store I
Store f
Store H
Store A
-otal Sq. Ft
4,200
2,728
2,719
2,709
3,169
5,769
4,188
5,769
2,645
]fficelExt.Stl
"irst Floor
1,546;
21644
200
2,528
2,719
2709
3,169
5,940
4,188
5,940
Loy
2,365
.uel Pumps 4
54 Exit Sign YES
'raffic VPD 10.000
6
YES
39,000
7
57,000
6
52.000
7
YES
52,000
8
YES
15.000
5
39,000
8
YES
35,000
3
YES
14,000
ial Per Day 585
639
700
737
842
1005 1,285
1351
1365
ia1/SF 4.22
0.25
0.26
0.27
1 0.27
0.17 0 -31
0.23
0.58
leverage of all 9 stores is 0.27 Gallons per sf per day
Each convenience store uses less than 1,624 gallons per day
;TORE A 2401 Ivy Rd
Staff advised that there was an ice maker and dishwasher
;TORE B Size is 3,169 sf
;TORE G
Size is 2.604 sf - first flr with 1.596 office above
;TORE D Size is 2,719 sf
;TORE E
;TORE F
*TORE G Size is 2,709sf
;TORE H
;TORE 1 842 Merrimac Trail, Williamsburg, Va - York County served by HRSD
ATTACHMENT A
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT LLC
Gas Station Water Usage
(1 Page)
ATTACHMENT B
2564 Mt, Torrey Rd Lyndhu rst, Virginia 22980 434 - 326 -0334 (Fax) 434 - 326 - 0340 Page 1
❑ N Ln a or m � o
n_ �, w C) n cv M r� o
C r as LO t- cD r r• r r
0 4 0 0 0 0 0 w N
0 0 0 Q 0 CD O" r-
c O CC] I m 0 C7 CO m V LO
O~ .;2- O co N N N `czr N �q m
p7
a
m
m
v
3
Q
CJ7
G
7
7
6]
C?
c
c
7.
m
0
Q
Q7
Q
0
Ln s�
LL
a
L`3
t13
a co
QC?
E N
C o
a
Z
❑ co
CN U
1- 0
0 0 a o C) 0 0
C7 C] 0 0 0 CD 0
Ln M M Ln M itl o
m �
- r CT Ln c
DO
DO
CD
7
0
0
7
C
00
0
0
0
00
@
Q
C
0
q
M
r Ln
ry
o
m
IT
w
LO oa
M
M
r
N
rt
in r
C)
Ca
0
C3
0
CJ 0
C)
0
0
0
0
0 0
LC7
L❑
N
�'
�i 3
04 r
EJ
N
N
!""
N
Cwl
V r
O
O
O
O
b
C7 0
CU
D
0
C7
C7
C7 CJ
M
CD
m
N
0
0 Iq
P_
lqf
0
ei)
Ca C71
N
N
N
N
r�
CU
0
0
0
0
n Cl
0
C7
C7
0
0
0 0
m
Ln
LL r
x��p
ti N
�+
�N--
o
°
Sp�J
rNV
m ccV
CD C7 D O D O d
0 0 0 C7 C7 CD Ca
CD r.- v Ln r o N
0 Ic o CO LO N 0)
M M N CN CN M
N N
0 o C7 C? C7 0 0 a 7
C7 0 0 O Ca O O
F� ti V t• a � @ @
LO L.0 Co Liz M CD m C C
N r r r N N
U �
o o 0 0 0 o o c m 0 C7 CD O C7 C) 0
C7 Ln Ln o N r to Ra
n r
N M C7
°o o C) °a CD 00 00 m
C\j m LS L
O r m 0o Ln a 0
CLP
tf r r N r N C'r]
p C) 0 O C7 0 0 L
a CD o cl c o o
w
V) 0 m N LO 47
07 CV r N M w m M
CD O 0 C� CU 0 0 co CL
r7 0 r_ rn r N rp
p CN r N N
0 0 0 C� C] CD C]
00 C.7 C) 0 CD 0 C7
M CD 07 r f- I` r
(n N — N r "1 N
U
as
N
C
@
'r]
to
vi
m
❑
n.
❑
a
tl]
r
F
to
p O
E
v �
CL
E
C �
[D N
E L
o O
Cra
� Q
N
CD
iV
Cl �
cn
a�
cQ a
r Li
0)
C
m �
a
CD
C
co a
c
a�
a
m �
(D
U �
CC]
U) N a
U alb
Q -
0 O C Q
113 ¢ }, [a
❑ Cl � ❑
U � M
Q �
cn z u)
C
7
0
7
C
Q7
1R
@
Q
C
@
L
d
C
W
CL
U Lid
❑
U)
N
_❑
CO
m E CO
C
°
-�
o
_0
_
G
-0
o
+❑+
0
@
�
l_
@
N
EJ
L.L
lL1
❑
LL
41
CL
O
SD m
+.r
Qmc>❑wLL
x��p
�+
r_
o
Sp�J
�fs/bQ �A'LI
U
as
N
C
@
'r]
to
vi
m
❑
n.
❑
a
tl]
r
F
to
p O
E
v �
CL
E
C �
[D N
E L
o O
Cra
� Q
N
CD
iV
Cl �
cn
a�
cQ a
r Li
0)
C
m �
a
CD
C
co a
c
a�
a
m �
(D
U �
CC]
U) N a
U alb
Q -
0 O C Q
113 ¢ }, [a
❑ Cl � ❑
U � M
Q �
cn z u)
N
L Q
L
Q
O
i--+
U] -4-
L—
D L
F
D
L co
Q] V3
L
C) E Co
f., � C)
w
MM
N C
o U
E
m (o N
x a)
Q �
0) � �L7
U C
x
�'- n m
(D
LL I_:-
0 cu
E
cc
0
E
r
x��p
Sp�J
�fs/bQ �A'LI
4
7�Pa y�I
to
0O yr%
r
4dfp
�Sa7Gl
T Ito
�
�O
,Y
�rr9
O04ClQOa0O
Lp
st
N
0 W %D
�* N
%
rfa
r,
4
-4
N
L Q
L
Q
O
i--+
U] -4-
L—
D L
F
D
L co
Q] V3
L
C) E Co
f., � C)
w
MM
N C
o U
E
m (o N
x a)
Q �
0) � �L7
U C
x
�'- n m
(D
LL I_:-
0 cu
E
cc
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT LLC
ACSA raw data
(1 Page)
ATTACHMENT C
2564 Mt. Torrey Rd Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 - 326 -0334 (fax) 434 - 326 - 0340 Page 1
a
0
07
Cl
zz
m
!i
o)
a
3
CA
4
7
7
W
O
SO
a
a
C7)
C
C
C4
W
O
t]
tli
0
M
i
m
LI}
m
co
D
� a
r�r CL
E Olf
G d
y
0 m
4
C N
C o
CM M
r
M 0 n vi
m r7 N It
C) o a o 0 a o
M m co 1°r) m ° p
ID 1- C7y T OD Ln In
M 117 + —
naaooaC)
a vvv�
(D to Ul>
r) o v as kc) a7
r) sr7 r Ca! � IC7 r
O v a 0 o °v p
n CD N r Lo CV r
v i- m n r-%t Lo
7 C1 C, 0 a O p
7C]00ap Q
)cornNLnm v
- vnlnvoorn
D C) 0 C) 0 a C7
7 C) 0 O 0 a CD
� ry u] Lt7 v r_ CV
r- Lo CV a l- LC)
'7 CV r CY N C) Cal
7 C) 0 C3 C) 0 a
] CJ d C) C7 0 Ca
7 r` 'RT to } r C) N
7 'et
C3 e+] 1C1 N (3)
7 M Cy CV N M r
? [a CD C:) C' a C7
J r r - N Cy dry
7 C> a o C) C� C7
a a Ca in a Q
7 (7) Li) r C7 N r
• 1- Sr 1- 4.0 C37 C+7
r CN cn
C� O Co C7 0 C)
1C7CD00ao
1 W 1 r C37 r Liz
1 C37 r M CO 117
r s- CAI r Cal M
O +0 (D 4 [7 Q
0 0 C7 C7 a o
C%I C") 11'7 Co (-
r
N en C7 CO cQ to
CL
i N c'Y
Y
M
C1 R m as D
O r CU Cl Q7 :
0 o o a a
.e c E- E
is c� E E E -c
v m cu (1)
O �U)wco
0au7CS7
CA N l— 117 N
LO N cn
CV IC] r C'7 C'7
U U
—1 J
Q7 (D
CD W N (1)
_ �+ u1
7 ` `3 7 m W
G M 0 C Q O
CIl E ❑. pL} CJ]
p a
C Q > 4] O
U- LL
LO CO C LL C
(yL== ODD
CA
C)
C'7
N
0
U
N
Q
Q
Q
4
Sa
t0
d
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT LLC
Analysis of raw from HRSD
Includes Original email
Map showing location
VDOT traffic count info sheet
(5 Pages)
ATTACHMENT D
564 Mt. Torrey Rd Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 - 326 -0334 (Fax) 434 - 326 - 0340 Page 1
Analysis of raw data from HRSD email dated 2/16/2009
Store H - 8017 West Broad Street (RT 250), Richmond
Located in Henrico Count , Va
Meter Reading Days in Conversion Gal in Cal per
CCF PerioA Factor period day
138
59
748
119
66
748
89
53
748
105
66
748
94
57
748
116
65
748
748
494428
1351
661
366
494428 gallons in 366 days equals 1351 AVERAGE gallons per day
Page 1 z)f 2
Sub1: RE: Info on Water Volumes for a Commercial Property
Date' 2/16/2009 2:14:52 P. M. Eastern Standard Time
From: cox co.hen!7ca.va.us
To: Musxi1@aol.com
You are correct in the calculations- The day use is the number of days in that bill cycle.
From: Musxit@aol.rom [mailto: Musxit @aol.corn]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 2 :11 PM
To: Cox, Mary
Subject: Re: Info on Water Volumes for a Commercial Property
Thank you Ms- Cox:
Just want to make sure I am reading this correctly
H[st Cycle - Is this the period of time? Is it billed every other month so
138 (Cons.) x 748 = 103,224 gallons for 2 months
so this is 103,224 divided by 2 = 51,612 gallons per month -
What dues the "59" under "Day Use" mean?
Just trying to make sure that it is included in the 138.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated -
Thanks Jo Higgins
In a message dated 2116/2009 1:51:09 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, coxluco.hennoo va.us writes:
I am forwarding the consumption for the address have requested. Hennco County bills in units, each
unit is 748 gallons.
E
Recycle -
00/00/00 00 /00 /0�as
Annua:
Hist s Day
WATER
* Eay
SEXIER
*
Day FJ
Cycle t Use
Cons. Charge
* Use
Cons. Charge
*
Use CI
0 59
130 353.00
* 59
138 376.34
*
00.
1 66
119 310.25
* 66
215 331.12
*00
2 53
89 235.64
* 53
89 251.85
*
00
3 66
105 265.20
* 66
105 283.95
*
0q-
4 57
94 241.66
* 57
94 258.98
*
00-
5 65
116 288.74
* 65
116 308.92
*
00
From., Musxit @aol.com
[manta :Musxit@ao[.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 6:38 PM
To: Cox, Mary
Subject: Info on Water Volumes For a Commercial Property
Good Morning -
I am working on a report
about water consumption for commercial properties = specifically
convenience stores.
I have looked at a stare in your service area J think it is} which is a WaWa at
8017 W Broad Street.
All l need is the monthly or whatever period you meter for the past year's
water
consumption say from Jan 2008 through Jan 2009.
Monday, April 13.2049 AOL: Musxit
. u5., u a _
' For the record, I am not asking for any financial or personal information on the property just the
amount of water that the store uses.
I received similar information from Albemarle County Service Authority and from Waterworks of
Newport News for store locations in their areas.
Your assistance is appreciated.
,70 mfzggins
Project Development Limited LC
104 Ana Marie Blvd
Waynesboro, VA 22980
434 - 326 - 0334 (rings cell also)
fax 434 - 326 - 0340
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy stops!
Monday, April 13, 2009 AOL: Musxit
_--I -- • -- a ' UTA" .J• 1141-iW LLiullu. Y A ❑y mapVuest
Ir1p► ►1�Y�S�
-le 4& 14 1
St -wunU Q
"&KW or
cmw Ra
Rudolph Ter
t Ln
I\N 9A
a zoos Ma FUR Inc.
Page 2 of
r
2m m
Sm ft
cry m
cpown" F4
riurrg$rf so** Rd
1
vIL46"
cr
sweet f1'%
0
S%4 Q
w
Map Data a 2009 NAV TfG _�O-r TeleAVO
AM n9ha feeerov d. Use subjea fo U=nsWC*pyripht Map Lo"m
Diremons and maps are irdixmahonal Dr y. We make m wamw6m an the aoaxasy of their mrrrerrl, rc+ad cwv*fwns or MOW usebidy or
rxpedNrousness. You assume al nsk at use. MepQueed and its supplier# shafl not be Im" to you for any loam or daft msuftM from your wre or
M W06*at. Your use of MapQ%NM metro you agree to ow Terms of U
http:llwww. mapq uest.comlmaps ?ci ty= Richmond+ &state =V A &.address =$417 +West +Broa... 4113/2409
� c
❑ n
c
W
U
cr
y �
3$
i¢
m
7 []
S
1 ❑
q�
C YY
r V
Q
LL
Y
V
Y
LL
U
d
I �
� m
I M
I
i N
a
a
4n
G
t I:
m I +I
LL
LL
�.
S
}
g
Ln
V
1(]
Lq
1
G
1
CC
0
LL
{7
LL
C
CM,
a
Cl
U
U
LL
o
a=
o
O
¢
¢
S
$
o
o
a
x
0
0
0
4
e
o
OD
rn
m
C LL
LL
LL
m
s
8
8
x g
LL
L
LL
r-
a
li LL
D ¢
M ~
C
V]
0 0
01
4 C
LL [)
0 0
C) F:
CD
o a
¢ C7
Q
0
LL u LL
a
8 2 Q
E
el
G
O
U
c
z
W
4h
Fl
LL7
a
LL
O
LL
3°+
n
0
e
a)
LL
DiS
N —
0
y7. T
C L
U =�
o p
W
LL
ill
S
}
g
T
v
cn
C
u7
G
0
CC
0
LL
y
O
¢
LL
LL
p
L-
o
C
O
b
R]
=
Y
x
li LL
D ¢
M ~
C
V]
0 0
01
4 C
LL [)
0 0
C) F:
CD
o a
¢ C7
Q
0
LL u LL
a
8 2 Q
E
el
G
O
U
c
z
W
4h
Fl
LL7
a
LL
O
LL
3°+
n
0
e
a)
LL
DiS
N —
0
y7. T
C L
U =�
o p
W
LL
LL
S
g
g
V
v
cn
u7
u]
0
0
0
LL
y
O
¢
LL
LL
p
L-
o
0
O
¢
¢
0
0
0
o
a
m
e
m
s
m
rn
ac
a:
LL
LL
LL
a
�
e
o
o
O
.L
pQ �
O n
�A
ti o
4
Lt-
c2
4
c a
U LL
0 0
o
o a
— v
0 0
C LL LL X
7 •f
N
C
C
C
c
c
[!7 V7 N !n U7 V} U7
[Y m m p PP cc m �pp
l fl W
UC
C6 In h RI
N
6
_ t}
Z !
C
3
0,
III
LL LL
C) q�q
N 4A
a
LL LL
4 C7
LL LL
O q
e ..
e o`¢
r
LL LL p
H
z g° g cc
~ n
Ln m
N
t �
t Q W
U `9
8 N
Y
C
N
LU
v
F
C
U
J cV
w LL
pd 0O
9
C7
U7
C;
LL LL
N r
0 0
LL LL
3e 3e
o a
a
e e
o
U"
r
U. LL C
C17
M N
a
rq ti
N
yyC W
G �
3i
m
p �
m
LLJE
LJ
y_u
N
�q
m
G
U
D1
N
�i LL
S
C'7 y1
d
g+ N
v o
U U
as a
o ¢
e o
M a
g
a LL �o
r
N '
v CV m
N
y
W
C
U `y
4
c ry
E
n
w
U
�n
m
C
P
L'
V
❑1
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT LLC
Analysis of raw from HRSD
Includes Original email
Map showing location
York County Assessors Info
VDOT traffic count info sheet
(6 Pages)
ATTACHMENT E
564 Mt. Torrey Rd Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 - 326 -0334 (Fax) 434 - 326 - 0340 Page l
Analysis of raw data from HRSD email dated 2/17/2009
Store I - 842 Merrimac Trail - York County, Va
Meter Readin
Days in
CCF (Period
Conversion
Factor
Gal in
rD�rind
Gal per
Hnv
Date _
1/2512008
45 unk
2/12/2098
42 18
748
7288442244
1745
3/14/2608
38 30
748
947
4/11/2008
37 26
748
27676
1064
5/1212008
44 31
748
32912
1062
6/12/2008
36 31
748
26928
869
8/4/2008
45 22
748
33660
1530
8/15/2008
41 43
748
30668
713
9/18/2008
41 34
748
30668
902
10/16/2408
46 30
748
34408
1147
11114/2008
40 29
748
29920
1032
12/15/2008
37 31
748
27676
893
1/23120091
42 39
748
31416
806
364
365772
8/4/2008 reading was assumed to be taken on 7/4/2008
365772 gallons in 364 days equals 1005 AVERAGE gallons per day
Subj:
Date:
From:
To:
BCC:
Fwd: Water Use for a convenience store - 842 Merrimac TO, Williamsburg
2/17/2009 11.48:29 R.M. Eastern Standard Time
M u sxit
Gbrooks7a albemarle.o_.rg, rhiggins@albemarle,org
msprouse67@ncc;wildblue.com
Glenn -Last minute data just rece' d. \
iv;y, HnSD sent the water us to for the other a location
842 rimac Trail. It is 5,940 sf, 1 in 6 water closets.
Below is the m ly amount i CF so using 74 the conversio r
The high is 46 x 7 -� 34 4 gallons per month 30 = 1,146 ga
The average for the 14 hs of data is 40.5 units x T48 = Q, 29 all ❑ns
This provides 2 /inthe with data roves that eventho
external sidewa and even withou incentive t
of the same sizrange of 1,010 to 1,3 52 Bpd w h
page i of 2 '
r
r day.
K mo or 1,010 gallons per day.
u 9K exte ' s igots pro 4 e some water for
minimize Ovate e - the vVV4r usage for a store
is significantly less than 1,624.
I would ver"much appreciate your patience in cons ring this new information
manks Jo Higgins
From: KLYNCH@HRSD.CCM
To: Musxit @aol.com, Customerinquiry @hrsd.com
Sent: 211 712009 1 1;34:20 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
Subj: RE: Water Use for a convenience store
Ms. Higgins,
HRSD does service York County and Williamsburg and the address you referenced. It is currently
under Wawa's name. The usage, in CCF, for that (518y" meter is:
01/25/085 CCF
02/12108 --42 CCF
03114/08 -38 CCF
04111108 -37 CCF
05112/08 -4 CCF
06112108 -36 CCF
08/04108 -45 CCF
08115108 -41 CCF
09118108 -41 CCF
10116108 -46 CCF
11114108-40 CCF
12115/08-37 CCF
01/23/09-42 CCF
02/10149 -33 CCF (this is the latest reading on account)
Thank you,
Kara E. Lynch
CIS Account Representative,
Payments
HRSD
kiynch@hrsd.com
Tuesday, February 17, 2009 AOL: Musxh
Page 2 of 2
From: Musxit @aol.ccm Imaiftc.Musxit @aol.corn]
Sent: Sun 2195/09 6:43 PM
To: Lynch, Kara
Subject: Re: Water Use for a convenience store
Dear Ms, Lynch - _
Thank you so much for sending this information.
To complete my report, I needed a couple other locations. One is in Henrico County and the other is
located in York County. I went to York County info and it advised that some of York County is served
by Waterworks of !Newport News.
Please check and advise if
842 Merrimac Trail is in your service area.
If so. please send the Jan 08 thru Jan 09 history of water usage.
I hate to bother you again. Thank you in advance for your help.
If you don't serve that area, do you know who does? (There are several listed on the web site
information }_
Thank You
Jo Higgins
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
Tuesday, February 17, 2009 AOL: Musxit
. - . j, . A ,.�� IVL�.;it3L11Q1 , r, winiamst)urg. VA by MapQuest
MAPQUE'ST_____,
wawa
on Merrimac Trail just NOM of Pennimen Rd
A: 842 Merrimac TO, Williamsburg. VA 23185-5314
Page 1 of 1
Free 3 in 1 Credit Rep
or4
View Your Credit Scores N
:: Excellent 750-W
0 Good 660 -749
Poor 3--0 -519
CZ;) 1 Don't Know ? ? ??
Find Out INSTxt► MV
4 Cau 7 - 800- FREE411 '1-800-373-3411 I and get Mapouav Drecnons wa text message
.4DOYMS Rd
I
__16 5 1S
WN
CW
:L pk4
740t
a 2089 MapOuret k►c
S%4 ')
0 aaa m
24m it
UK 0" Wei ri
SL"*
C*~
cne..u..rn F
a,ar _
LC9)ft pf
1
WIV-
�auntrr
Map Data 02009NAVT
AM r.pttls re"Nad We Subfaal to L+Cer4WCOpynphl Map Legarid
6v ECh5n5 ar+d mBPS ere mff al+gnal W lO WO MaLKO no Warry"4" On the 0-C 2Cy Of WOW COrd&V tOOG Wnd IIOnS W mutt u Awl lty Or
You assume all risk of uaa lueppl A and rt5 7;tpp4urs "N nd M hWJv tg yw for wrry pys or delry rewlhhp ham yow use of
•L1 a COU65t YCU Ube of MapQlia si ales S )g egreo tO W 1e^ -j 7' Jae
FN
http:llwww.mapquest.comlmaps? city = Williamsburg &st ate= VA&address= 842 +Merrimac +... 21/15/2009
r...� ++= =vi,rauLetlls. 0`►4 Mr.liP[. MAR_ 1 Kt.
Property Information: 842 MERRIMAC TRL
Owner in formation
Owner Name- WAWA INC
ktading Address 260 W BALTIWORE PIKE
Mta Ifng Address 2:
CdylSWeZ9PCesde WAWA PA 1Si063
beta Referents:
PPrior wner information
ners Name:
ale•
Census Trea:
Gov Off.
Flpod Map-
Cwe of SaYa
ConsWeration
Deed Rele WWe
CoAwdenmon•
2nd Prior Owners Name: 2nd Desa Reference
2nd Dele of sale. 2nd Conssderadon
Page 1 of I
G6 to Map; Search Resulri New "arch on,,T
i
507 00
BRUTON
5101a2003D8
7!21!2004
so
Deseripbon &4viQuanthy Description Seae+Quan*
0 ASPHALT 2" 8+1893
0 SP WGHT 9
0 CANOPY GAS 8000 u
Baths are Iis1lW by number or half bMs 11.1 1 full and 1 half bath, 2.2 = 21UI and 2 heft k OM. eM]
S
��jj te- L�Pr � p
L7 ` � �- I Ll' Q 54— i
http:l lwww. yorkcounty. govlrealestateassessmentlyork lsearchldspDetail.asp ?WID =2732 2/15/2009
6
G m
O g
{L}
N
�❑
�g H
Lo
�v a
W t?
w m
F
e
s m
_a
C
C
I
t
1
I
Q
G
a
J
n
7
i
i
4
C
u
S
S
C
C
C
O7
LL
3
A
] m
z
ed �
z
l�.
LL
LL
LL
LL
QQ$
6
L�{
r
N
CN
g
[Q
an
O
4O7
O
C
a
L
m
LL
LL
LL
g
N
W
LL
k
LL
Lt
LL
O
Q
p
Q
S]
O
q
C
O
p
p
p
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
6
O
e
Vi
r�pp
a
Q
O
O
ag
LL
x LL
L4
c
O
C7
b �
o
N
C]
6
v
e
e
e
r�i
ao
�v
S]
m
m
f LL
LL
LL
Lti
O1
dy
n
W`
a
u7
F
01
QI
s
Y
i s
U2
g
�
8
$pp
$
s
13
L
4
Li
_ z
q
o
N
o
�
�
L
E
�
ar
7.
E N
N
W
OR
h
f—
F�$E
a
O
U
U
z
ed �
z
l�.
LL
LL
LL
LL
QQ$
e
c"y
r
rn
m
g
[Q
an
[f)
4O7
6
4f7
a
L
m
0
0
o
v
o
LL
k
LL
Lt
LL
O
Q
p
LL
d
6
q
C
O
p
p
p
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
6
O
e
3`
at
a
Q
O
O
ag
LL
x LL
L4
c
O
�
e
ae
N
v
e
e
e
r�i
ao
�v
S]
m
m
f LL
LL
LL
Lti
u7
F
Y
i s
U2
J J
4e]
Li
_ z
q
o
N
o
pO
m
cm
Z
3•
V
P
`n
7
1
C9
a
LL
cv
m
O
U
Q
C3
0
aD
m $
ALL €
t 3
J �
C c
c
Q f^
LL
LL
LL
8
�
c"y
r
N
m
N
[Q
an
[f)
4O7
6
o
a
LL
iL
L'.
�
O
O
Q
p
LL
iL
LL
4
Cl
e
3`
at
a
ag
LL
x LL
L4
c
O
�
N
r�i
ao
�v
S]
w
r.
Aa
a > >
t
CJJ
Aa
a > >
Project Development LLC
PC MINUTES
SUP 2008 - 033
BOS MINUTES 12 -03 -2008
ATTACHMENT F
2564 Mt. Torrey Rd, Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 — 326- 0334 (fax) 434 — 326 - 0334
Page 1
COT'NTY OF ALBEMARLE STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
Project Name:
Staff: Scott Clark
SP 2008 -00033 Shadwell Market
Planning Commission Public Hearing:
Board of Supervisors Public Hearing:
November 11, 2008
December 3, 2008
Owners: Lloyd Wood, Jr.
Applicant: Lloyd Wood-.!t.
Acreage: 1.18 acres
Special Use Permit for: Groundwater use
over 400 gallons per site -acre per day on C -I
zoned property not served by public water.
TMP: Tax Map 79 Parcel 10
Conditions: No
Location: Intersection of Richmond Road
(US 250) and Louisa Road (Route 22).
Existing Zoning and By -right use: C -1
Magisterial District: Rivanna
Commercial - retail sales and service uses;
and residential use by special use permit (15
units/ acre); EC Entrance Corridor -
Overlay to protect properties of historic,
architectural or cultural significance from
visual impacts of development along routes of
tourist access
Requested # of Dwelling Chits: NIA
DA RA X
Proposal: Use of more than 400 gallons of
Comprehensive Plan Designation: RA -
groundwater per site -acre per day for
Rural Areas: preserve and protect
convenience store.
agricultural, forestal, open space, and natural,
historic and scenic resources/ density (.5 unit!
acre)
Character of Property: This property is a
Use of Surrounding Properties:
small, cleared site used for a tong - established
Surrounding properties include a quarry, a
gas station and convenience store.
railroad, commercial uses, and the planned
site of a church.
Factors Favorable:
Factors Unfavorable:
1. The requested level of water use would
I. MTBE contamination has been found
not affect the water supply of nearby
at a nearby site. However, it is not
properties.
expected that the requested water use
would lead to contamination on this
site. If it did occur, MTBE can be
easily detected and filtered out of the
water.
RECOMMENTDATION: Staff recommends approval of SP 2008 - 00033.
r.
Petition:
PROPOSED: Use of more than 400 gallons of grourtdwater per site -acre per day for convenience store.
ZONING CATEGORY /GENERAL USAGE: C -1 Commercial - retail sales and service uses; and
residential use by special use: permit 05 units/ acre), EC Entrance Corridor - Overlay to protect properties
of hiftoric. arc+ite -tural cr ruItura! vtgrificance from visnrx:i iwpatts of development along routes of tourist
access
SECTION: 22.2.2.11, Uses permitted by right. not served by public water, involving water consumption
exceeding four hundred (400) gallons per site acre per day. Uses permitted by right, not served by public
sewer. involving anticipated discharge of sewage other than domestic wastes.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY- Rural Areas - preserve and protect agricultural,
forestal, open space, and natural, historic and scenic resources/ density ( .5 unit/ acre in development lots)
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR. Yes
LOCATION: Intersection of US 250 (Richmond Road) and Route 271231
TAX MAPIPARCEL: Tax Map 79 Parcel 9
;MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Scottsville
Character of the Area:
The immediate surroundings include commercial and highway- related uses, a railroad, and the Luck
Stone quarry. However, to the north (across I -64) the area is characterized by large rural estates along the
Southwest Mountains.
Specifics of the Proposal:
Section 22.2.2.11 of the Zoning Ordinance requires uses in the C -1 coning district that are not served by
public water to obtain a special use permit if they use more than 400 gallons per site -acre per day, As this
site is expected to use approximately 1,000 gallons per day (estimate based on septic -output numbers
from the Virginia Department of Health), but is located on a very small site, this requirement must be
met.
The water would be used for a gas station and convenience stare with food service. This is a by -right use
in the C- l district, and the site is currently being redeveloped with a new store that will replace the long -
stranding store on the site.
This request is only for the water usage, and not for the store use ---the store itself is a by -right use in the
C -1 zoning district.
Plannina and 7anine Histo
ZMA 2002 -O(W9: On November 6, 2002, the Board of Supervisors approved this rezoning, which
only affected the portion of the property located south of U5 250. The northern portion had always
had commercial zoning, but the southern portion was rezoned by the County during the 1984
comprehensive rezoning. This made it impossible to use the southern portion for C -1 related impacts,
including the septic field for the store. Approval of this rezoning applied C -1 zoning to the entire
property.
SDP 2007 - 00155: This final site plan for the redevelopment of the store on this site is still under
review, pending a decision on this special use permit request. The site plan would permit
redevelopment of the site and would accommodate planned safety improvement to the VA 22AJS 250
intersection.
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan:
The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Rural Areas, emphasizing the preservation and pnxeetion
of agricultural, forestal. open space, and natural. historic and scenic resources. However, the C -I zoning
of this property recognizes the established commercial nature of the Site.
The character of the surrounding area is unusual, a$ it contains Lt Light Industrial, HC Highway
Commercial, and NR Natural Resource Overlay coning within areas designated as Rural Areas in the
r^+^,r re! a :e:: Plan.
STAFE COMMENT:
Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4,1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
31.2.411: Special Use Permits provided for in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the
Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property,
The Groundwater Manager has made the following review of the proposed water useage:
The well completion report for the well on TMP 79 - 9 shows a yield of 15 gallons per minute.
At that rate, the 1,000 gallons per day maximum use estimated by the Virginia Department of
Health would represent only 5.5% of the flow over the 17 hours per day the present store
operates. There is ample water to support the planned use. The small percentage of the
groundwater flow that the store will require would most likely neither effect the speed and
direction of the flow, nor the quantity of water available to the neighbors.
Therefore no substantial detriment to adjacent property is expected.
that the character of the district rill not be changed thereby and
No change to the character of the area would occur. The site would continue to be a highway - related
commercial use.
and with the public health, safety and general welfare.
The only known public- health issue on this site is the existence of a methyl tertiary butyl ether
( "MTBE ") contamination in the soil of the former GOCO oil site across the railroad tracks from this
use. MTBE is a fuel oxygenate that is added to gasoline to help reduce air pollution. The federal
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) re viewed available health effects information on MTBE in
its 1497 Drinking Water Advisory guidance and decided that there was insufficient information
available to allow EPA to establish quantitative estimates for health risks and as such would not set
health advisory limits. Therefore, while MTBE is of potential health concern, it is currently an
unregulated substance.
No contamination has been found in the Shadwell Market well, and the Groundwater Manager's
review cited above states that the level of use is not sufficient to significantly change the flow of
groundwater in the area, Therefore. it is not expected that the nearby contamination will cause any
health risks on this site. Most concerns with MTBE arise due to the unpleasant taste it causes in
water. Staff discussions with the Virginia Department of Health's Drinking Water di vision found that
MTBE would be detected by Water users evert at levels below health concern. and could then be
removed by various EPA - approved filtration methods. Filters are placed on the water line from the
well by the landowner.
SUMMARY:
Staff has identifed the COI ]owing factor favorable to this application:
1. The requested level of water use would not affect the water supply of nearby properties.
Staff has identified the f 1!vuint .fstitnr Urfa• c�a!^.� j.D this ,Pp;;�atiui7.
1. MTBE contamination has been found at a nearby site. However, it is not expected that the
requested water use would lead to contamination on this site. If it did occur. MTBE can be
easily detected and filtered out of the water.
RECOMMENDED ACTION-
Based on the findings contained
Shadwell Market.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A — Area Map
Attachment 8 — Detail Map
in this staff report, staff recommends approval of SP 2008 -OW33
4
minutes
11 -Nov -08
Page 1 of 3
Albemarle County Planning Commission
The Albemarle County Planning Commission held a meeting, work session and public hearing on Tuesday, N
Auditorium, Second Floor, 441 McIntire Road. Charlottesville, Virginia,
Members attending were Calvin Morris, Chairman, Thomas Loach, Linda Porterfield, Marcia Joseph, Bill Edgertor
non- voting representative for the University of Virginia was absent.
Other officials present were Gerald Gatobu, Senior Planner, Ron Higgins, Chief of Zoning; Scott Clark, Senior
Planner; Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning; David Benish. Chief of Planning; Amelia McCulley, director o
Development; Bill Fritz, Chief of Community Development and Greg Kamptner Deputy County Attorney.
Call to Order and Establish Quorum_
Mr. Morris called the regular meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and established a quorum.
SP- 2008 -00033 Shadwell Market (Sign # 8 & 201
PROPOSED: Use of more than 400 gallons of groundwater per site -acre per day for convenience store.
,ZONING CATEGORYIGENERAL USAGE: C -1 Commercial - retail sales and service uses; and residential use by
protect properties of historic, architectural or cultural significance from visual impacts of development along routes
SECTION: 22.2.2.'11, lases permitted by tight, not served by public water, involving water consumption exceed in
right, not served by public sewer, involving anticipated discharge of sewage other than domestic wastes. COMPF
protect agricultural, forestal, open space, and natural, historic and scenic resources) density (.5 unit/ acre to develc
LOCATION. Intersection of US 250 (Richmond Road) and Route 221231 -TAX MAPIPARCEL. Tax Map 79 Parcel f
Mr. Clark presented a Power -point presentation and summanzed the staff report.
• This is a special use permit request for water usage at the existing Shadwell Market. which is being redeve
adjacent property are zoned C -1, Commercial. Section 22.2.2.11 requires that any use not served by public wate
a special use permit to use that much water. This permit request is for approximately 1,000 gallons of water per c
The request is not for the store itself, which is a by -right use. It is simply for the volume of water used.
■ There are two main issues with this type of permit. There is water safety for the use itself and the impacts of
in the staff report, the Groundwater Manager's review shows that there is not any expected impact on the height
site that uses such a low percentage of that potential volume. Therefore, it is unlikely that it will affect the neiS
MTBE, a fuel additive, on an adjacent site. Again, however, due to the low volume of use on the site it is not e:
been tested several times including earlier this year. There is no sign of MTBE in the well an this site. Even if it t
by anybody that drank the water. It is not a regulated substance. Therefore, they are not able to establish a star
to anybody that drinks the water at that time. It can be filtered out. They don't expect that will the MTBE will move
• In summary, staff did not believe that the water availability in the neighboring properties would be affected. S
there is some future concern with MTBE it can be filtered out. Staff recommends approval of the special use perm
inhtm1: file: f /M:ISPROUSE- JEFFRIES11LLCIWATER DATA\Shadwell Market - PC min... 1212112009
rn i -autes
Page 2 of 3
Mr. Morris invited questions from the Commissioners.
Mr. Laach asked regarding the MTBE if there is any test monitor protocol so that this gets tested routinely to see if
Mr. Clark replied that the only testing he was aware of is the occasional testing that has been done in the past by
would continue in the future DEQ may consider this as a closed case at this point.
Mr Edgerton suggested one way they could address the Possible healthlsafety issue here would be to perhaps
the stare That would. in fact, deal with this if it ever became a problem.
Mr. Loath suggested that a condition could require testing.
Mr Clark pointed out that right now there is nothing to be filtered.
Mr. Karnptner noted that the condition could require periodic monitoring and once levels reach a certain level, ther
DEQ site.
Mr Clark replied that it was a close case. The problem with trying to set a value for monitoring is that there ha
unsafe. They have not been able to get any results to show that.
Mr. Kamptner said that in their building regulations in Chapter 5 of the County Code they have some prerequisitf
zone so that they are not doing draw dawn that is going to cause a contamination plume to spread They did estal
Mr. Graham noted that BTEX is an acronym that stands for benzene, toluene, ethyIbenzene and xylenes. MTBE v
Ms. Joseph noted that in a conversation with Josh Rubinstein, Groundwater Manager, this afternoon he said tha
DEQ. They do testing periodically. He said that each of the wells surrounding this area has been tested and the
ground testing from time to time. He explained that because of the draw down he did not feel as this thing wa
diluting as it migrates and they don't know Therefore, Mr. Edgerton's comments about some sort of a filtration s,
about was that there are some little organic creatures apparently that eat this stuff So they are working on that a
gong on in this area.
Mr. Cilimberg pointed out that recently they dealt with a jurisdictional area request where an owner had MTBE in t
becoming an owner concern before it really would become a public issue. An owner will then say that they have
public water There is the opportunity through the Board of Supervisors in the jurisdictional process to receive pu
a water line out in that area. it has been granted in this area on two occasions with LOCO and one other prope
Secondly, there is that remedy if there is no other alternative to deal with it
Ms. Joseph said that the difficulty is the remedy is there, but a lot of this zoning is stale old zoning,
Mr. Cilimberg said that they dealt with it by the jurisdictional area designation of the two existing structures onl}
where they have existing structures within existing problems.
Ms Joseph questioned if they are creating a problem in the future by allowing this water usage. She understanr
septic determines the amount of water that can be used in terms of 1,000 gallons per day What they are looking
Mr. Morris opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to come forward
Lloyd Wood, property owner, said that they have discussed every issue that the Commission has raised over th
mhtml: file:/ IM:ISPROUSE- JEFFRIESIILLCIWATER DATAIShadwell Market - PC min... 1212112009
minutes Page 3 of 3
approved_ The only reason, as stated by state, that they are here is that the old store that there was there used
did not about this until they had the site plan before us and they just guessed that the new store would use more
come up with a formula to determine whether they did, there is no formula. They checked with the health departm
thought they were using in the store. In a discussion with the staff he asked that they come up with something.
the 1,000 gallons a day approximately that is the capacity of the drainfields which are on the other side of 250. f
the other side of the rail road tracks. At the request of the county they had an extensive ground water assessor
information to the staff and they tested everything within 1,000 feet, which included all of the sites h4s. Jo -zph r.
with the proMperty in the Parly rhirtSpc they,, !Iavc need hau a DcC� picoiem. I heir site has been tested as well as t
Mr. Morris invited questions for the applicant.
Ms. Joseph said that she keeps trying to figure out what food service means. She asked if they are doing take out
Mr. Wood replied that it would be like a normal convenience store with sandwiches and carry-out items. There w
been for all these years. They are just bringing it in to the present day existence. He noted that his father built th
would soon have fallen in. He agreed with the staff report, They have worked very closely with staff since tl
something that the Commissions will be proud of
There bei{ -ig no further questions, Mr. Morris closed the public hearing to bring the matter back before the Commis
Motion. Ms. Porterfield moved and Mr. Edgerton seconded to approve SP- 2408- 00033, Shadwell Market based o
The motion passed by a vote of TO,
Mr. Morris said that SP -2008 -00033 would go to the Board of Supervisors on December 3, 2008 with the n
recommended approval of SP -2008 -00033 to the Board of Supervisors to allow the use of more than 400 gallons r
Return to PC actions letter
riihtml; file:l /M:'SPROUSE- JEFFRIESIILLCIWATER DATAIShadwell Market - PC min— 12/21/2009
Ms. Thomas asked if the presence of MTBE led to the addition of a jurisdictional (service) area for
the ACSA tar what was 96n9 to be resi den tsal property; was it because there is a taste and odor problem.
Why is this contamination being taken so casually?
Mr, Cilsmberg said that junsdicbonal area request was made because of the existence of the
contaminant, and because at water quality concerns the Board alloweC only the existing structures tq have
water. In Ihis particular case there 4 no conlamrnalion evident at the site so there is not an issue in
granting the special use permit, tut should M T B E become evident on this vi a, it can be 1iRered and deep
with in the future.
Ms. Thomas said she would hate to see creeping jurisdictional Imes and would not want approval
to imply that jurisdictional area designation is just around the corner.
Mr. Slulzky asked what effect the i ncreased draw Isom the groundwater Iable would have on She
contamination plume from the nearby GOCO side. Mr. CiIimberg said that location is some drstance away
and it is difficult to tell from the underground geology whether H is even in the same area of the plume -
Groundwater staff did look at that and a groundwater test was done for the Church of the Nazarene sale.
That test tound one toot of dra*down per .12 9asons per minute pumped. Using that rate at ShadwelI
would allow for a reasonable assumption that pumping 1,000 galbns over the 17 hours per day the store
is open would render a drawdawn of 8 -17 feet a the well. The stall's report indicates That the distance
below the casing of the Church's well 10 the water bearing zone is 230 feet and the effect of the Mawdown
would be a matter of inches not feel. The judgment is that the drawdown is non- existent or negligible
even pulling this water will not pull on the plume that is in an area larlher removed from this location.
With no further questions Prom slats. Mr. Boyd opened the puohc hearing and asked the applicant
to speak.
December 3, 2008 (Flegulor Clay Meeting)
(Page 29)
Code 1987. 12-97: 4-9.80: Ord. of 8-8 -90; Code 1986, § 12 -29; Ord. 98�.85-98,,� Or d fly
9
2 -7 -05, effective 1-1 -06-. OS -9(11, 12 -3.081
Stele relernner -Va. Cade I4112.752IC1
.Sec. 9-409 Duration.
The license tax year under rms of this article Shall commence on the first day of
January and strap expr•e on the rty !irst I D"'. 'r u: It* calendar year.
(Code 1957. § 12-S8. . 0 } pf 2 14 -90: Cade § 12 -30; Ord. 98 A {1j, 8 5 98; Ord. OS
9(2), 12.7-05. all t -1 -08i Ord. 0ti-9 {1), 12 -3.081
Sac. 9— served.
Sec,4411 Reserved.
$ac.9-412 Reserved.
� rr
v` c�} x� C1�1
Agenda Item No. 13, Pub Ifc Hearing. SP- 2008.033. ShadwelI Market! Sign s A8 & 2D)
Pr9posaL
Use of more than 400 gallons of groundwater per site -acre per day far convenience
store.
ni no Cal n —/Ge n ga I U s a : C -1 Commeraat -raLail sales and service uses: re side niiaf uses
by speraat use permit (15 u i Isiacre): EC Entrance Corridor 0verlay-lo
�J
protecl properties of
h slonc, architectural or cultural sign.Gcance from visual impacts of developmenr along routes of
tourist access.
Section: 22.2.2-11, Uses permitted by right, not served by public waver, involving waler
consumption exceeding 400 gallons per site acre per day- Uses permitted by right. not served by
public sewer, involving anticipated orscharge of sewage other than domestic
wastes.
m r n PI n 1 n i : Rural Areas - preserve and protect agricultural, forestal,
open space and no[ural, historic ano scenic resaurresidensily {,5 univacre in development lots).
EntamaLgEd= yes
Location: Interwtior of US 250 {Richmond Rd] and Routes 22J231.
Taj_MapLPW& Tax Map 79, Parcel 9.
Magisterial Qi;iL: Scottsville.
(Notate of this public hearing was adverlised in the Daily Progress on ?.)
Mr. Climberg summarized the slatl's report which is an file in me Clerk's Office and made a part
dl the permanent records of the Board of Supervisors. He said this is a request for redevelopment of the
Shadweft Markel site ld allow usage of groundwater 10 exceed 400 gallons per site we per day: at this
time there is a site plan in process. This store is at the corner of Routes 22 and 250 and was zoned for
commercial use prior to the rural area plan for this area. The ordinance permits up to 400 gallons per site
acre per day without special use permit, but since this is expected to exceed that amount a special use
permit is requested. He said staff has found that the requested level of water use would not
affect the
supply Of grounpwaler for nearby properties; there is the existence of MTBE contamination in the general
area - baseo on an analysis done by groundwater stall, they do not expect the requested water use to lead
to contamination on the site. This type of contamination can be easily delacted and fittered. He said staff
and the Planning Commission have bolh recommended approval di this perms[ with no conditions
attached,
Ms. Thomas asked if the presence of MTBE led to the addition of a jurisdictional (service) area for
the ACSA tar what was 96n9 to be resi den tsal property; was it because there is a taste and odor problem.
Why is this contamination being taken so casually?
Mr, Cilsmberg said that junsdicbonal area request was made because of the existence of the
contaminant, and because at water quality concerns the Board alloweC only the existing structures tq have
water. In Ihis particular case there 4 no conlamrnalion evident at the site so there is not an issue in
granting the special use permit, tut should M T B E become evident on this vi a, it can be 1iRered and deep
with in the future.
Ms. Thomas said she would hate to see creeping jurisdictional Imes and would not want approval
to imply that jurisdictional area designation is just around the corner.
Mr. Slulzky asked what effect the i ncreased draw Isom the groundwater Iable would have on She
contamination plume from the nearby GOCO side. Mr. CiIimberg said that location is some drstance away
and it is difficult to tell from the underground geology whether H is even in the same area of the plume -
Groundwater staff did look at that and a groundwater test was done for the Church of the Nazarene sale.
That test tound one toot of dra*down per .12 9asons per minute pumped. Using that rate at ShadwelI
would allow for a reasonable assumption that pumping 1,000 galbns over the 17 hours per day the store
is open would render a drawdawn of 8 -17 feet a the well. The stall's report indicates That the distance
below the casing of the Church's well 10 the water bearing zone is 230 feet and the effect of the Mawdown
would be a matter of inches not feel. The judgment is that the drawdown is non- existent or negligible
even pulling this water will not pull on the plume that is in an area larlher removed from this location.
With no further questions Prom slats. Mr. Boyd opened the puohc hearing and asked the applicant
to speak.
December 3. 2008 (Regular Day Meeting)
I Page 30}
Me- L. F- Wood, owner of the Shadwell Store, said they have been working on this with County
staff tar two years. The site plan has been approved except for the special use permit requested today for
the wafer. The old Shadwell Markel uses less than 400 gallons per day, but the new store will probably
use more than that as it will be more modern. He said there is no foreseeable reason to believe that any
other contamination can leak into the site as their orawdown will be minimal.
Mr. Slutzky suggesled Thal Mr. Wood explore a geothermal HVAC system, as it mighl be more
cosi•effecl ve for him in the long run. Mr. Wood said the area They are using on the north side of Route
250 is about one -half of an acre, and on the other side of Route 250 is another one-half an acre being
used for drain lields and a drip system to handle about 1.000 aallon -s per day. He reed -he,ho0irW+ tanks
r,jergivund have meant trey are maxed out an space, but he does tike the off icency of a geothermal
system.
W 4h no one from the public rising to speak, the public hearing was closed, and the matter was
planed before the Board.
Mr. Dorrier immediately offered motion to approve SP•2006-033. Ms. Thomas seconded the
motion, which passed by the following recorded vole-
AYES: Ms. Thomas, Mr- Boyd, Mr. Domer, Ms. Mallek. Mr. Hooker and Mr. Slutzky,
NAYS: None.
Agenda Item 1lo�14.lo ed Meetin g- At 12:16 p.m -, motion was oflered by Ms. Matlek Ihat the
Board go into a closed msuani to Section 2.2 -3711 IA] of the Code of Virginia. under Subsection
(1) to con siaer appointments to boards, comet itte as. and commissions. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Stutzxy.
Roll was called;,s/Id the motion carried by the follawng recorded vote:
AYES: Ms- Thomas, Mr BoOs4 Mr. Domor, €A.& Mallek, Mr. Rooker and Mr. Slutzky.
NAYS, None. f
Agenda Item No. 15. Certi€y,plosed Meeting. `At 2:09 p.m., the Board re nvened into open
session. .
Motion was immediately otlered)y Mrs. Mattek that ohs Board certiWby a recorded vote that Io
the best at each Board member's knowledge only public businesb matters lawtully exempted from the
open meeting regOramonls of the Virginia Ffeeaom of Iniormationand identified in the motion
authorizing the closed session were heard, dls 'qusseci or considered kOVp closed session-
The motion was ascended by Mr. Rook&. Roll was called, and the"hW_ on carnea by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Ms. Thomas. Mr. Soya, Mr Dorn er, Ms. Mallekt Mr.. Ron ker and Mr. Slulzlcy-
MAYS None.
Agenda Item No. 16. Boaras and Ci6mmisslons: VaCerlcieslAppointments.
Mr- Slutzky offered motion to7 '
Appoint Mr. De Forest (Mike) Mellon to the f4kfural Heritage Committee Wth said term to axp,re
September 30, 2012.
Appoint Mr, Albert LaFayee. Jr to The Region To"Nommunity Servic9s Board to till an unexpired
term which will end an June 30. 2011.
Appoint Mr. John Spri ngeil to the Pohes Deparlmen ens Advisory Committee to fill an
unexpired term which well end -on March 5, 2010,
Reappoint Mr. Ross Stevens In the ACE Appraisal Review Committee with said terr.to expire
December 31, 2005.
Reappoint Mr. pavid Booth as an alternate member to the Board o` Building Code Appeals th
said term to expire November 21, 2013
Reappoint Mr- Bruce Dotson to the Public Recreational FaC+l+lie5 Authority iogrn said term to expir�
December 13, 2011.
Reappoint Mr. Reed Muehlman to the Rivanna Sohd Waste Authority Citizens Advisory
Committee with said term to expire December 31. 2010.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Rooker. Roll was called and the motion carried by the following
recorded vote,
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT LLC
VDH
Sewage Disposal System
Construction Permit
(12 Pages)
ATTACHMENT G
64 Mt. Torrey fed Lyndhurst. Virginia 22980 434 - 326 -0334 (fax) 434 - 326 - 0340 page z
1`J t
tXDHOF VIRGINIA Albemarle County Heattn DEPARTMENT Department
HEALTH PO Box 7546
'
-i iry You and Your Environmerf 22906 , :•,
(434) 972 -6299
(434) 972 -4390
September 16, 2009
Jeffries II, LLC
P. 0- Box 910
Crozet, VA 22932
Subject- Sewage Disposal System Construction Permit
Health Department ID #: 101 -09 -0311
Tax Map Number: 558-1
System Capacity: 1600 gallons per day.
Dear Jeffries 11, LLC:
This letter and the attached drawings, specifications and calculations dated duly 8, 2009
constitute your permit to install a sewage dispose] system on the property referenced above.
Your application for a permit was submitted pursuant to §32.1 -163.6 of the Code of Virginia ,
which requires the Virginia Department of Health (VDH") to accept designs for onsite sewage
systems from individuals licensed as Professional Engineers (?Es). This law allows PEs to
design onsite sewage systems that do not fully comply with the Sewage Handling and Drsposa.
Regulations (12 VAC 5- 610 -10 et seq. ) and requires VDH to accept such designs provided they
comply with standard engineering practices, performance requirements set by the Board of
Health, and certain horizontal setback requirements necessary to protect public health and the
environment.
VDH hereby recognizes that the design submitted by Michael Craun, P. E. complies with
the requirements of the Code of flirginia and grants permission to install the system as designed
in the area shown on the attached plans and specifications
If tnadiFcations or revisions are necessary between now and when the system is
constructed, please co:ttact the PE who designed the system upon which this permit is based.
Should revisions be necessary during construction, your contractor should consult with the PE.
The PE is authorized to make minor adjustments in the location n* rtPr; ,, �! •�-
Mai aueyudte documentation is provided to the Albemarle Health Department,
r r�a+eAi1 }�i�ri�iQi
The PE that submitted the design for this permit is required by the Sewage Handling and
Disposal Regulalion.s to conduct a final Inspection of this sewage system when it is installed and
to submit an inspection report and completion statement to the Albemarle Health Department.
The health department is not required to inspect the installation, but may do so at its sole
discretion. The sewage system may not be placed into operation until you have obtained an
Operation Permit from the Albemarle Health Department,
This Construction Permit is null and void if site and soil conditions are changed from
those shown on your application or if conditions are changed tYom those shown on the attached
plans and specifications. VDH may revoke or modify any permit if, at a Iater date, it finds that
the system would threaten public health or the environment. This authonzation to construct a
sewage disposal system expires March 16, 2011. This permit is not transferable to another
owner or location.
Sincerely,
)AAA 7AAqje5
Josh Kirtley,
Ertviroruncntal Health Specialist, Sr.
PC: Michael Craurn, PE
206 Forest Drive
Waynesboro, VA 22980
-,
Page 1 of -
AOSEIPE Report for
Lot Section ___, Subdivision_ —___ _ ►4LAF 46�ounty
Location of property: ___, _.�_�
GPIN or Tax Map #
Latitude / Lc n gl to d e___—
Applicant or Client and address:
Prepared by AOSElPE [name i nd addressy:
Date of Report: �_ -- AOSEIPE Job Number: _
Revision Date; — - -T .____ -- Health Dept. ID. No.:
Contents /Index of this r5porti2
Pknral
L�1I�1 S
— P& ffz r nom► I,
Certification Statement(s)3
1 hereby certify that the evaluations andlor designs contained
herein were conducted in accordance with the Sewage Handling
and Disposal Regulations (12 VAC5 -610), the Private Well
Regulations (12 VAC5 -615), and other applicable policies of the
Virginia Department of Health- Furthermore, I certify that my
evaluation andlor design contained herein complies with all oft, erAL.
applicable laws, regulations, and policies implemented by the
Virginia Department of Health.
1 recommend a �t 4 �W +} * 4 be ANO 11: n
PF�or
{optional}
P3 I 1
Insert appropriate title: "Construction Permit ", "Subdivision Approval ", "Certification Letter"
' Examples include: "Soil Information Surrimary", "Soil Profiie Descriptions ", "Water Supply De; .� n Specifications
"Pnmwy/Reserve Design Specifications ", "Construction Drawings "S:te Sketch ", "I'roi ucl SpCs ILratton Sheet's
' PE work is regulated by the Deparursent of Professional and Occupational Regulalson. This sect cli is considered optional for PEs.
`
Fill in this blank with the appropriate term "certification letter', "construction permit', Or "subd vision approval"
' Fill in this blank with the appropriate term. "approved ", or "denied"
Commonwealth of Virginia
VDH Use Only — •
Application for. ® Sewage System ®Water Supply
Health Department ID#
Due Date
Owner: Jeffries I1, LLC
Mailing Address: Po sox 9 10 - - -
Phone 434_ {11 -4669
Croat, VA 22932
Phone: 434 - 531&73
A ent: Old Dominion En ineerin
Mailing Address- 2036 Forest Drive
Fax.
Phone: CAA n42 -Sfi40
Waynesboro, VA 22984
Phone: 544- 255.1740
Fax: 540 - 213.0297
Site Address: 611 S Rockfish Gap Tnpk
Crozet, VA
Directions to Property: From Charlottesville take 1 64 toward
Erriail: olddomen a telos.aet
Crozet, take Yancey Mill Exit, take a right on Rt. 250,
prnperty is an the right approximately'
/. of a mile.
Subdivision: Section:
Tax Ma 55B -1
p Other Property
Block: Lot:
identification:
Dimension/Acreage Acres
of Pro
Sewage System
Type of Approval: Applicants for new construction are advised to apply for a certification letter to determine if land is suitable
for a sewage System and to apply for a construction permit (Valid For 18 months) anly when ready to build
For New Construction. ❑ Certification Leiter ® Construction Permit
For Existing Construction ❑ Subdivision Review
❑ Repair ❑ Modification ❑ Expansion
❑ Replacement
Proposed Ilse:
❑ Single Family Home {Number of Bedrooms ] ❑ Multi -Family Dwelling fTotal plumber of Bedrooms )
® Other (describe)Convenience store, gas station, office
Will there be a basement: ❑ Yes ® NO If yes, will there be fixtures in the Basement? E) Yes ❑ No
Are any conditions proposed on [his construction permit? [❑ Yes ® No If yes, please check or describe all proposed
Conditions that apply: ❑ Reduced Water Flow ❑ Limited Occupancy
rem r use not to exceed 1 year !' Y ❑ Intermittent or seasonal use
Other (describe)
Water Supply
Will the water supply be ❑ Public or ® private is the Water supply pp y ❑Existing or ® Proposed
If proposed, is this a replacement well? ❑ Yes ® No Will the old well be abandoned ❑ Yes ❑ No
Have any buildings within 100' of the proposed well been termite treated? ❑ Yes ® No
VED
All Applieaots
is this an AOSE/PE application? ® Yes ❑ No if yes, is the AOSE/PE package attached? ® Yes ❑ T
Ia urdex for VDH to process your application you muse attach a Site sketch and pleat of the property Tl a site sketch stroul 7your prA41 c C�,
sctuai andlQr proposed buildings and the desired location of your well andkx sewage systern When the site evaluation is ted the tine
bui lding location and the proposed well and sewage system Sites must be dearl rnartred and the ra Y
alherrnyc this application Il be denied y P Percy Su vii to etc tiic " ?
�� �.Ic' NO. a36gS9 ,
1 glut ion e V nia Departnatnr of Health (Vt)H) to rnter asstq the property described during nomtat business Cher a( re�
AGi§ sing X61 a h ti❑ an to perform quality assurance checks of evaluatinns and designs eertifi y a rluthocixcd "'''�` �'✓
(+x ! C] ar a prcf al erg eer (P E) as necessary until the sewage disposal Sys tern has beer, c" tr cted rid approved. 0 f�A 1, �NG�t�
! i i i i {ti n
Signature of
n-
Narrative /Ca lcu I ations
Property Use
APPROVED
Tfte der:: =opr:en: �f,h:. pfolck t wi11 be in two phases. Phase i will be the convenience storeigas
station and ancillary office (4,750 sgft convenience store and 1000 sgft office). Phase 2 will be a
tenant lease building (approximately 3340 sgft). The exact nature and use of the tenant lease
building will be determined at a later time but will take into account the maximum water usage the
county will allow at the site ( 1624 gpd), the actual water usage of the phase l development, and the
projected water usage of the tenant lease space occupancy usage. The anticipated rental uses will be
lower water users such as offices, light warehouse, and retail. Uses will not include iaundromats
and restaurants.
This permit is for the fully occupied parcel at the completion of Phase 1 and Phase 2. Pnor to the
beginning of Phase 2 the owner will supply the wastewater characterization of the existing Phase 1
development and the proposed Phase 2 development to VDH to ensure that the entire development
is under the permitted amount. The calculations are based upon a typical occupancy of the ]eased
space and include Phase 1 and Phase 2. To further note, the wastewater treatment system will be
flow equalized to 2.1 times design flows to allow for the actual amount of effluent distributed to the
drainfield to approach the actuat average water usage.
Wastewater Characterization
Average Daily Water Usage
Water usage data was obtained for five similar convenience stare facilities. Each of them have a
convenience store, deli, gas pumps, and managers office. Shown below is the actual water usage
data and the locations of the similar facilities.
Average water usage of all facilities is 21,750 gallons per month or 725
note, this includes in some cases the water used to wash parking lots.
Brownavlhe
Market
16,400
17,E
22.400
19,400
19,860
22.300
21.100
21,406
29,000
18, Doc
16.00G ■
k? 15 peL i�1 D 7
�'ss oN w
GAS STATIONS WITH CONVENIENCE AND FOOD TALKE OUT SERVICE
Water
used in galkin5 i mprth
Data
Liberty
Shell
Sheil
t3P (Rolkin)
�RT29 & Airport RdJ
(RT29 d Greenbrier)
(RT250 Free Brld9e)
RT250
Nov-C7
20.200
24,160
18.500
20,800
od-07
24.300
22.106
29.500
21.300
Sep -07
21.300
19.666
23.100
23.660
Aug-07
23.000
27.6D0
27,800
23,4300
Jui-07
22.400
23,100
16.50D
24.800
Jun-07
28,900
26.300
13,700
25.600
May-07
28.000
25.500
14.800
25.404
A4r -07
23.300
26.300
15.400
19.200
Mar-07
14.900
23.500
15.800
22.000
Feb-07
15.900
23.500
23.100
15.800
Jarr07
17.200
22.900
18.300
24.900
Dec-06
19.20D
30,700
16,300
30.260
Aw Gall Month
21,542
24,693
19,650
23.459
Average water usage of all facilities is 21,750 gallons per month or 725
note, this includes in some cases the water used to wash parking lots.
Brownavlhe
Market
16,400
17,E
22.400
19,400
19,860
22.300
21.100
21,406
29,000
18, Doc
16.00G ■
k? 15 peL i�1 D 7
�'ss oN w
Per VDH GMP 35, drainfield and wastewater disposal treatment wit! be ssae o ]
725 gpd noted earlier,
hourly an d da l Ey peaks. we will be using significant flow equalization to dampen the effects of
n dal
Convenience store — 1015 gpd
The water use at the facility will include food preparation and sanitary uses.
Office — 1,000 sq fl @ 165 tToss sgfl per employee = 6 employees
15 gpd per employee = 90 gpd
(Flow rates estimated from EPA Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Manual, 2002 Table 3 -4
typical office 7 to 16 gpd per employee)
Total = 1 105 gpd
Phase 2
Since the exact mix of the development is not known we will calculate water usage as if the
buildings were fully occupied with small retail stores and then again for all offices. The exact mix
will be somewhere in between.
All Offices
3,300 sqh @7a 165 gross sgft per employee = 20 employees
15 gpd per employee = 300 gpd
typical office rates estimated from EPA Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Manual, 2002 Table 3 -4
7 to 16 gpd per employee)
All Small Retail
39 parking spaces @ 3 gpd per parking space: = 1 17 gpd
6 employees @ 13 gpd per employee = 78 gpd
Total water usage = 195 gpd
{Flow rates estimated from EPA Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Manual, 2002 Table 3-0
typical shopping center 1 -3 gpd per parking space and 7 -13 gpd per employee.}
AU Warehouses
3,300 sgfl @ 1000 gross sgft per employee = 4 employees
15 gpd per employee = 60 gpd
(Flow rates estimated from EPA Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Manual, 2002
typical office 7 to 16 gpd per employee)
U �
F
N°
+�3 S9
O NOLL@.�'
� Phase
Average of all uses 185 gpd
Total Phase l and Phase 2 = 1290 gpd
As a safety allowance we are using a 1500 gpd design basis. This Atli allow for a
µ*f A L h+
Aflic E
z
a
APPROVED
A water meter will be installed on the well. Si nee the treatment process will be flow egtualized, the
Owner will record the water meter readings once a month.
Available Soils and Onsire Dispersal Suitability
Steve Gooch AOSE identified three potential drainfield areas on the property. A slmmary of the
three drainfield areas are nre.sento-,d
Drain kW
FA veraga
$bpe
Area
Number
of
hues
w'M
of
Trancn
({t)
Primary
Area
Avaetatlle
(500
Reserve
Araa
Available
[syft}
Depth
of
tnstallatibn
(is+chasi
ROSE
Estimated
Pare
Rata
impiy
Length
tnl
Width
{p)
R
8.5
75
120
id
3
1575
1575
42
50
B
10
E5
Sa
1D
3
975
975
32
d5
C 7 50 1 12,0 14 t 3 1 1680 1680 96 60
Ksat and Loading Rates
The saturated permeability (Ksat) of the drainfield area was evaluated using a Johnson Perm earneter
by Michael Craun PE to determine the maximum acceptable Hydraulic Loading Rate (HLR) the
drainfield can accept. The Ksat tests were run at a depth of the inf ltrative surface of the proposed
drainfield (approximately 42 ", 36 ", and 96 "). The locations of the Ksat tests are shown on exhibit 2
and the test reports are provided in attachments.
Summary of Ksat results
Test
Depth
(inch)
Representative
Ksat
(cmlday)
Al
44
20.0
A2
42
47.3
A3
44
85.0
B1
38
8.5
B28
40
3.2
B3
37
57.3
C1
97
89.8
C2
97
39.8
0 L
4 c. �.
Representative Ksats for Test Areas
APPROVED
The representative Ksalrmld for the drainfield infiltrative surface is Based upon the geometric; mean
1/28.6 crrt/day).
Determiuiag Loading Rates from Ksat Values
The projected effluent level to the drainfield is expected to be type 2 effluent (less than 45 mg/l
BGD). We propose determining the maximum HLR using the integration of several design
and research Papers Janssen and Siegrist (1 991), Taylor et a](] 997), Smith (2400), Crites ail manuals
(2000), Winneberger (1985), and Kilduff (1989),
HLR ( rype2efTuext) = (18 )Ksar-2i
Where Ksat is in cm/day and HLR is in LPD /SQM
Ksat = 2 Ksatflld
Limited to a maximum of -2 Ksat
Fvr the infiltrative surface
HLR("e2efJuenr) = (18)Ksar 25
HLR = (18)(2 x 28.6) 25 = 49.5 'Pd = 1.2 Gla gal r
y f'
Maxim urn = .2 x Ksat = 11.4 cm = 2.8 gpd
day sqfl
Recommended Maximum HLR = 1,2 gpd/sgfl
Install 14 lines @ 75' long, 3' wide = 3150 sgft (.51 gpd/sgft). The installed drainfield will be in
area A and area C. Area B will be used as additional reserve.
Septic Tank
Daily Flow = 16(>O GPD
Required Detention Time = 48 hrs
Minimum Required Capacity = 2800 gallons
Use 2 Septic tanks in series 1500 gallons each
HRT = 1.875 days
4'
Af W 4.
FHA E4 n,
Lic No � UAr
859 .
SAL Ef4�'.
Recirculating Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland Loading Rate
Combination of media filter and vertical flow wettand.
Secondary Effluent Quality (10 mgll BCD and 10 mgll TS S)
Hydraulic loading :ate
1600 gpol(34- x 34') = 1.56 gpolsgft
Biological Loading Rate
1600 gpd @ 400 mgll BOD = 5.32 lbs BOD per day
5.32 lbs BOD per day 1 (32'x32') = 5.2 lbs SOD per 1000 sgft per day
Flow Equalization Pump Tank
5004 gallon tanks
Liquid Depth = 95"
52.6 gallons per inch
APPROVED
Required storage above alarm float 6 hr x 1 d124 hr x 1600 GPD = 400 gallons = 7.6"
Set Alarm float at 87"
Float Separation
Timer On at 24"
Override Timer 80"
Set Alarm Float 87"
Working volumes:
Override Timer to High Level Alarm 87" - 80" = 7" = 369 gallons
Timer On1Off to Override Timer 80" - 24" = 56" = 2945.6 gallons
Total emergency equalization volume - 3713 gallons
RVFCW Manifold
Filter Manifold has 118" holes and will be operating at 4' of head
Flow per orifice:
Q= 12.38d' fh
Q = 12.38(.125"
Q = 3869 gal
min
Each lateral has 16 holes - 16 x .3689 gpm = 5.9 gpm per lateral
4 laterals per zone = 4 x 5.4 gpm = 23.6 gpm
4 Zones
L
r0+4
O
.4 A1CHAEL. y
a F. 9
U CRAUN
Lic.No. U36a59 �a
TDH -hs +.002 ? + .000995 x 61 x Q""
TDH = 12' +.002(23.6)2 + .000995 x 61'x23.61 as + 9' +4'
(2,1 )+ 87
TDH = 26.9'
APPROVED
drenco PF200511 yields 25 gpm @ 70' - throttle to 4' residual head in manifold.
At full development 0 600 gpd) and a dose of 1.5 gallon per orifice
Dose volume = 96 gallons + 15.3 gallons (pipe fill volume) a@' 23.6 gpm = 4,72 minutes
At 5:1 recirculation rate - 100 doses per day - 14.4 minute cycle time
4.72 min on; 9.68 min off
Dosing depth in R VFCW
96 gallons per dose x 12 "!1' x .1337 ft3lgal ! 1024 sgft = . t 5" ponding depth
Initially set to 1200 gpd with 5:1 recirculation rate
4.72 min on; 14.48 min off
Drainfield Dosing Pump Tank
1504 gallon
Liquid Depth = 54"
27.7 gallons per inch
Required storage above a larm float 6 hr x 1 d124 hr x 1600 GPD = 400 gallons = 14.2"
Set alarm float 15" below invert of pipe (415 gallons)
Dose volume to Drainfield = 400 gallons per dose = 14.5"
Depth to keep pump submerged = 20"
Pump Off = 22"
Pump On = 36.5"
High bevel Alarm = 39"
Verify with drawdown test
Pump rate is between 37.5 gpm and 45 gpm which gives a pump run time per day of 42.7 to 35.6
minutes.
1 N,Jj1II j
F� �
MICHAEL
4e+
F.
CRAUN
a
Lie. No. a31S859
`S
r
�M.sl
I
►�rr��Y cu
o
U
N
r
>e - pEe
�' .0 G u r, O
�Howwoa
v.
G
n
�
E
'
u
•y�
iq
d
�' `u
p
� ��
m•° w v i
w n x] —0 OC
v
^�
a ga
W
E"
66«�,
❑ a
1309020'
�o n
G
0
C r ~ ❑
zrzQ a�
rig
I
o'a
�a
<
� � v
r Fuel
I
I _
1
i
}
I
c, 3
I
c
i
.+n
PY
M
�g
iJ
OF
f
�i J i J i� i •f
J J i
r
I �
c �
JAd bb H'S.,�
I
v
i9971'LLt 7.dEl I�N�
Q .�.
Y. GO
o a
v E
a
❑ U
5 v
r
1
ti� t i
� $s
F �
7
a
v
�FN r
E x ci e�
oe r n
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT LLC
Re=Store'N Station
Preliminary Site Plan (revised)
(1 Pages)
ATTACHMENT H
i64 Mt. Torrey Rd Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 - 326 -0334 (fax) 434 - 326 - 0340 Page 1
U.5- ROUTE X50 NO,
� 110,
, .I 1•'�• -. • •raw.. v � �
pp�tdd 15rpkrllela 'L ' y
GL�
_ - - - I.-
-
9D -
N
P
h
A
' - 4
4,06 ACRE,5
3•B �r
DS. -9 9,p
9
y 27i
' riy '� p10 _ -. ••�'N�7'�B'� 33Q: Df! -+~ter _ .ter �''
ff -- - - - - - -- -- 1
Project Development LLC
WAWA STORE
PHOTOS OF EXTERIOR
AND PLUMBING FIXTURES
ATTACHMENT I
2564 Mt. Torrey Rd, Lyndhurst, Virginia 22980 434 -- 325- 0334 (fax) 434 — 326 - 0334
Page 1
!i
d�
i
p I
f
�i
la
t
1.
i�
A O -1--C7 s
w. *Y
Y ! � �•a
a
Ae
� •S�a
f!If
!f
,w 1
6,s
kit -
VIA
�a� �Ph�P,t�arh5
Summer Frederick
From:
llllusxit @aol.Gom
Sent:
Thursday, April 01, 2010 8:31 AM
To-
Summer Frederick
Subject:
Re- Store'N Station. Water data
Attachments:
WATER FIXTURE ANALYSIS - PER DAY.pdf
Summer -
After reading through Greg K's memo, I wanted to give you the analysis of the plumbing fixtures based upon a PER DAY
usage. With the focus clearly on the what does use water rather than the underlying by -right use, this is important.
Please see attached. The frequency of use for each fixture is greater than actually occurs and based upon a 24 hr period
to make it the worst case scenario. The plumbing fixture data sheet for the urinal, toilet, and faucet is attached which
give the now volume ie gallons per flush. With water conservation fixtures which are becoming the norm, this business
will use much less water than WaWa. must to make clear - This s ecial use ermit was re uested only because the
County re uired it and not because the business will use more than the allowable 400 gall ons per day er acre.
The water will be monitored to comr)ly with the health department septic permit which overrides and is more definitive than
the language in the County ordinance. You should already have the Pulse meter that is proposed to be installed to
monitor the water use. Of course, if RS is allowed to connect to public water a ACSA meter would be less hassle for
everyone.
I also talked to Jay S. who advised what plumbing fixtures are code required for a certificate of occupancy. He also
advised that although AC does require the facilities to be included in the construction of the building is all. Whether they
remain available to the public or staff or unlocked is up to the business owner for instance_ The restrooms are for the
convenience of the patrons. Of course, if they are not available (or not well maintained /not clean) the patrons will go
elsewhere. The code requirements for food preparation which is under the Dept of Agriculture (not health dept in this
case) it does require a hand wash sink for instance. It is also up to the business how they prepare food and wash dishes
or use disposable containers making all this optional.
Please make sure to include in your staff report that the Preliminary Plan that was previously reviewed (and all
comments were addressed) was for a 6,00Dsf 1st flr and on the revised PP it was reduced to 4,750sf - this was after
conversations with the Chief of Zoning because we understood that a significant reduction would result in a determination
that a Special Use Permit would not be required. Subsequently, that was not the case but l just want everyone to
acknowledge that the size reduction was an effort to appease everyone including those persons that have spoken out
against the very existence of the use at this location.
There is a lot of other information floating around that is not correct. To list a few -
1. Number of fuel pumps on the Site - there are 6 under the large canopy and 1 under the small canopy. The 2nd island
under the small canopy is for "off road" fuel which is for small contractors to fill their tank up that sits in the bed of their
pick up truck or for small farm owners to purchase fuel for their farm tractors. It is illegal to use this fuel in a street vehicle.
2. Number of nozzles on each pump - Each fuel pump has 2 nozzles - so it can serve a car on each side of the island.
3. Availability of "unbranded" gas being new - Currently there are already 2 unbranded gas stations along this section of
RT250West - Gateway sells unbranded and SuperTest Gust to the West) sells unbranded so this is not a new product to
the area.
4. That this is a Service Station -This is not a "service station" which under old water use tables shows water usage: as 10
,gallons per vehicle. As you may be aware, there are service stations in large cities but our area they are few and far
between these days. The Exxon in Ivy on RT250 is a service station (across from Toddsbury) but most have been
converted to conveniencelretail with gas sales. There is also the Exxon on Emmett Street in the City.
If you need clarification on any item or more description. please advise.
Your assistance is appreciated.
Jo Higgins
Project Development Limited LC
Attachment D
2564 MtTon-ey Rd
Lyndhurst, Va 22952
434 - 326 - 0334
musxit(cDaol. com
Attachment D
6
n
Lko
z
a
X r
H
R E
L
6U
� N
N
H ...I
d
aC
w W
'S
x
CC
io
.t
uui
m
X
z
Y
z
Z
W
a:j
❑
P,
ath
m N
7 N
Cy p
�e L^
5
t
A
.4
�"
Y
kD
c [i0
91IZ
3
rj
Q
'o 'r°
0
R
°
W
m
LL
a
.�
IL>
LL
Y
- a
u]
} w
v d a a
a w0
m a
•�
CX d
4t 7
t
N a
C= xZ-* w
di
N a
'
?
oc
p
m
v
' a'
m °
i
w a
y o
Q
cn
a .,
..
n
x amc
-a v
m u
y
m
d
G
rn v
or
d �i
.�i xi
a
'ti
41 C
w
6 2
A
Ln n
95
ro
'13 a- x
Q cam!
d'A
CL
'.
6u D
un
m
0
-
an
LA
m a a
LM ao
06
v
LL.
D
,r
a W
a
u, .n
a* 1e
q a
R
r.
47 R
a
r'
F F sa
C
r m W
Y
r
C ''' •0 A
N
N
W Q
Q
[6
W
Z
..
0
Ln
N
Z
m,
2
a
r
n
n u
d =� 2
WE
Z
z
o
n rrw
m
m °' a n
y
N 3
Q
='
c a M
T
t°• ¢ a
a
°
m
e
a 'w
a n Q
cl
G 7
Q
J rw o
o o
n
vtr
D ^� oL
r'
Ln Lm ai
V1
Ln
N
^O
Cr
d
W w ^ m
�^
V
LJ r w
C
2
d
7
7}1 tl.i L
N
:s W n
4 + H
n
a `u
—� R
E 3
=ui Q
M3
LU
�•
C
r_
c
Y 2
c°
4 M w Oy
9 w
Y R
41
C l
K
W
W n Lr
v$
a
E N r
V1
r
ue
G
7 N
°'
a Z
w
a
4
CL
.a,
r
c
r[
°1
-1e
ae
7
M
r
QA
G! p
+
m
Y a
2
R
aca °2
-oj
�
„ 3c _16
2 �
�
Attachment D
KOHLER: K- 351Q-1: Highline'4• Comfort Heighv'w c lon -ated 1.0 of toilet wTh tank cov... Pdue 1 of
:• r •
s a•
Highiine'l) Comfort Heightb elongated 1.0 Upf
tenet with tank cover locks K- 3519 -T
QtminEiGns:
30 -ufL' u 2i-1., Y 3i 114"
fiighline Pressure ute :.0 gpl towels are myle ;a Tor
those- customers aggrecswely seeking the beneflts of
staler Wri Servoltar, lhi5 new weer quail Figs for Watei
rebate programs and contrrdutes to LEED credits. An
optimized flush setting *educes water
tansumptron by more than Nee err, :.6- galrcn tolleLs,
offettng a water savings of more than 51000 gallons of
water per toilet, Per year.
• 3f]•118 -1. x 2l 31z'W x 3t - ? ;q "H
■ FreS4rrre A9oiet fitrshing rysWiTi
a Two -weot toiler
• t:inngate7 tnL,<r
a Inrluoeq trip lever, les. seat Ana -.upoiy
• Meet& 5.10rt flushing performance guideiines
esta011Shed up the EPA I Env or Lin meroWf Prot e[tiGn
Agency; WatPrSelise program
■ Watec5erfse lauried toilet-$ use at leas: 2Q5,- iesa
waterthar• standar(I T 6- gailui• te del s
■ This pranuct ran help a bullding earn Waco-
Eff ',ciency potnts in the LEM Green Building Rating
System —. see sperification 5ftett for Ovate, use
Eeta.
Available Colors
t
Color Finish: White (-Oi
Model hiurnber: K 35:9 T -G
Li,-;t Price: Afi" -)!5
.-j -i
Wj
0
lVr.l r is �i!;n7 : 4i;
af�iYH j ipl
McX6486 SO%,P
r+Arlgbv' I-
$34111 r!N�4 -
'nn art MXW1861- L- er:44WgES7ra 4L.; i•r CY. L1.$ fl.ta:y T.> P-Lt Vp 31gr It YGU! k -*l WOFFr ovtigi r r re -J�lvrrw.
jnar• trx B: )g"ted -W it - 7'ieir g ^,rM c pe,"tie PR'r.OUe poke] arm err %uk•tert r,. 'tiaPWi- w"N.t non -c
Ti +rkr rVict%d)nrr iry; -4 ",Drxni�. Any' So km fAY 4pow -a0ty wit py 4fr4.9 to Nif rww. s
http: "µ�►► _us.kollier.acmr;s�nlinetnttklo 1print.jsp' ?prod nutty= 35194
2W20i0
Attachment D
Nh asbbrook f=ioWiss,''`t U. 125 CiPI- L'rilittl Sy-41C n - 1131hruunt PrWutt5 - Urinals h} Amer... ['ne 1 of 2
S fit in a: Wr IRA fellimir
Product Informa tion
This pn9c was printed from' "bit, —&-w amerkcans --ird Corr
Washbrook FloWiseT"' 0.125 GPF Urinal System
Estimated List Price. $873
• System Indudm
0 -1M Gpc Urine -- Washout AClian
High &9ciency (0-125gptr -5 Lpf}
■ Over 87 %w ate r savings when comparap fd 1 0 9 A f
system
Flushing rim
■ Elongated 14^ wr kam finished wall
■ Washout flush action
■ E %[ended sioo far privai:y
. 3W trip spud
• ❑uttet connection threaded 2' Inside [NPrM
s 2 well hangers
-■ Strainer Included
■ Meets ANSI Hush requ.rements at 0 125 g p I
0.125 GPF SelsGVanic tlrrnaI Flush Valve
• HIgl, effiaency {0,125 gp!i 0 5L.0
■ 0o era tas an ❑C Pawef {battery mdu(Jed)
■
11 W" Rough-in
■ Water pressure range 25.125 psk
Recamenped o ensure range 36-W psi
■ Self- tlearting piston peralion
Fully mechanical manual Overrlde
■ Fall -sale- valve automatically Closet on loss of
power
• Chrome - plated
COLORS:
71 White (020)
FIXTURES & COMPI)NEWS:
Main FlxWres
I
C
FEATURES:
F611 ADA Compliant
EdWater Efficient
,y
hiip:.' >'t %"Y .amcricanstu xiard- ws. com 'urinaIsru;ishbtctpk-tlo,.kise- 0.125 -�,rpf urinal- system1 UV2010
Attachment D
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
TD: Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator
Ron Higgins, Chief of Zoning/Deputy Zoning Administrator
FROM: Greg Kamptner, Deputy County Attomey
DATE: March 25, 2010
RE: Re -Store N Station
This memorandum addresses several questions raised by the applicant and County staff pertaining to the
proposed Re- 5tore'N Station project. The applicant is seeking a special use permit authorized in the Highway
Commercial ("HC') zoning district under County Code § 18- 24.2.2(13), which provides:
13. Uses permitted by right, not served by public water, involving water consumption
exceeding four hundred (400) gallons per site acre per day. Uses permitted by right, not
served by public sewer, involving anticipated discharge of sewage other than domestic
wastes, (Added 6- 14 -39)
The scope of this memorandum is limited to certain questions related to water consumption and the special
use permit. The Department of Community Development is addressing other issues related to this project.
1. Questions asked by the anplicant
The applicant's questions have been narrowed to two because they all focus on a single issue — the
applicability of special use permit and its conditions if the use's water consumption is less than 400 gallons of
water per site acre per day.
Under County Code § 18- 24.2.2(13), the special use is permission to consume more than 400 gallons of
water per site acre per day, up to some ultimate daily limit that may be imposed as a special use permit condition_
In response to the applicant's questions below, we have assumed that the 1,624 gallons per day referenced in the
applicant's questions is the site Acre equivalent to the threshold of 400 gallons of water per site acre per day
established in County Code 18- 24.2.2(13).
A. Question: Does the special use permit "exist" if the water consumption is less than 1.624
gpd?
Answer: Yes. The "special use" is permission to consume more than 1,624 gpd and that
permission exists regardless of whether the water consumption is less than 1,624 gpd.
Attachment E
KO HLER,
FAUGITS
Features
Bras:. ConslaicROn
. Sfncgle•hole mwstfimg
■ ov"ounfer bailer}' and valve for easy ifiS[allalra�
mainlanance
va al- resrsranr aerator
• 24" �I Crnf heXlr]tr? Supply hoses fazr easy inslallaomn
. 6 --Ve" 17.1 CM) span[ reach
. S'a[ron ry SpoU
. A,1Ji1 mth o1 r mthouf mixer
fncluos 40 AAA Wiffenes
Les8 drain
. .5 gallons (F' R) per minute flow ra[e
CadeslStan ids Applicable
spectfied model rrlO r $xc$ the 101u rirlg et [IA[e 01
maomtacture
■ ADA
■ A5AlF A [ 12.78. [/ESA ?�. 7
• fCCIANSf A 7 17. 1
. Energy Policy Ac[ of 1992 �
Specified Model
Made) ^UeeCri Imil
- i348t3 rlectroniC sauCat with mixer
L-1846 Iecirww faucet - Wlthow mixer —
llmml Accessorise
M79 2A otsrflav
71 G dc am witneat Medl
inW 9
K- 13478.94[10.7 0m) Bs uWr1W' p✓ase_�s w
K.13479 $ 1 8" [20.3 on1 eSDUtchBOn place -scan
K 138D1 -ThO rM1OStatic Qatng valve
I
ELECTRONIC FAUCET
K -1 3466
ALSO K -1346?
ADA
L�
Colors /Finishes
• CP Nifishad Chrome
. v5 StA+rriess steel
Accessories
. Co: PWlsheo chrome
. VS: 5lslmess Steel
• NA Nana apphcab,a
01p& Rpfer SLt Price Bank for add, T"l Do I DMA I niches
I
CglPrefFln{aftee _ i
G — - J VS
MCP JV5
-1 KA
Product Specification
The elect ron is 1e"C4 shall be made D1 brass Co4'et't -0an. Prothsm shaP nave 0-- nfdgaas �irtJPM'j. PM Product1 ss at11 feature do
(17 -1 crn] spw reach, sinuanary spout any 24" 651 cm) flexible sups y
above -mjnW badety and valve Tor easy Ins+aA Am of, enfJ m3InlCnanCe. PraPuef shell all Dde two AAA batucnls. all :)e t char
be for siVe -hole mounting. Product shalt ev*abre with a' wrlh jut
Pecrtivc. Snan be 105s.drem• FBUCeri Sr1All pe 4Sah�ar
Model K —
-- - - LMAli;srlada- 1- W- 8KOHLER
Fage 1 a, a ti-OW 456-4M
1102780 -4-D www ftorder flom
Attachment D
B. uestion: Would the conditions imposed by a special use permit be enforceable if water
consumption remained in the by- right range (less than 1,624 gpd) or would they be
enforceable only when water consumption exceeds the 1,624 gpd threshold?
Answer: The conditions would be enforceable at all times although, as explained below,
the Board of Supervisors could determine that some conditions apply only once some
water consumption threshold is exceeded.
The County has already determined that "there is a significant likelihood that the project's
water consumption will not stay below the [1,624 gpd] consumption threshold." Official
Dererrrtination dated November 17, 1009 (Ron Higgins). Because the special use is
permission to exceed 1,624 gpd, a condition requiring the ongoing and daily monitoring of
water consumption would be a reasonable condition to not only determine whether the
threshold is exceeded on any day, but also to determine compliance with any special use
permit condition limiting water consumption. Since on any given day the threshold or
limit could be exceeded, ongoing monitoring could be required even if water consumption
on any given day does not exceed 1,624 gpd.
However, the Board of Supervisors also could impose conditions related to water
consumption that would provide that they would not apply until, for example, water
consumption exceeded a prescribed amount for the first time. If daily water consumption
never exceeded that amount, those conditions would not apply.
2. The proper scope of review when considering a special use permit under County Code & 18- 24.2.2(13)
County Code § 18- 24.2.2(13) authorizes any by -right use in the HC zoning district, but requires a special
use permit if the use will consume more than 440 gallons of water per site acre per day. In evaluating a special use
permit under County Code § 18- 24.2.2(13), the proper scope of review does not include the underlying by -right
use.
For example, if an applicant proposes an "automobile service station" use, which is a by -right use in the
HC zoning district under County Code 18- 24.2.1(3), but the proposed automobile service station would consume
more than 444 gallons of water per site acre per day, a proper special use permit analysis would not include
consideration of whether automobile service stations are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or, whether the
automobile service station use satisfies the criteria for evaluating a special use permit under County Code § 18-
31.6.1. By Allowing automobile service stations as a by -right use in the HC zoning district, the Board of
Supervisors has already legislatively determined that the use is within the class of by -right uses that satisfy the
purpose and intent of the I-IC zoning district and that the use does not generate impacts that require a case -by -case
evaluation under the special use permit process. As a by- right use within the HC zoning district, any impact
resulting from the automobile service station use is addressed by existing site regulations such as those pertaining to
the buildings' height, setbacks, noise, parking and outdoor lighting. A by -right use would neither change the
character of a district nor be contrary to the district's purpose and intent because the range of by -right uses allowed
in a zoning district defines the district's essence.
Therefore, the review of an application fora special use permit authorized by County Code § 18- 24.2.2(13)
is limited to the issue of water consumption. Even though the scope of this special use permit review is more
limited than a typical special use permit, the same special use permit criteria apply. The Planning Commission and
the Board of Supervisors will need to determine whether the water consumption use is consistent with the County's
Comprehensive Plan and whether it satisfies the criteria delineated in County Code § 18- 31.6.1, i.e., whether the
water consumption: (1) poses a substantial detriment to adjacent property; (2) could cause a change to the character
of the district; and (3) would be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance, the uses
permitted by right in the district, with additional regulations provided in section 5, and with the public health, safety
and general welfare. Because the proposed Re- Store'N Station site is designated Rural Areas in the Comprehensive
Plan even though it is within the HC zoning district, whether the water consumption for the proposed project is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan would also be a key issue. In addition, because of the difference between
2
the proposed project site's Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning district, whether the proposed project is in
harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance (rather than merely the purpose and intent of the HC
zoning district) would be another crucial issue.
3. The prover scope of The conditions imposed under the special use pernfit
Based on the analysis in Section 2, a special use allowed under County Code § 18- 24.2.2(13)
pertains to water consumption only and, therefore, the scope of the conditions are limited to impacts Arising
from water consumption, and not from the underlying by -right use. Any conditions imposed must be
reasonably related to the impacts of water consumption, and the extent of the conditions must be roughly
proportional to those impacts.
In granting a special use permit under County Code § 18- 24.2.2(13), the County may impose
reasonable conditions that pertain to not only monitoring water consumption as discussed in the answers to
the applicant's questions in Section 1, but also which pertain to the consumption of water in general. Some
of these conditions could indirectly pertain to the by -right use, provided that they reasonably relate to
addressing the impacts of water consumption, e.g., hours of operation to control total water consumption
per day or restrictions on using groundwater to wash down parking areas or watering landscaping.
4. The a pp] icable criterion for determining the amount of water consumed ner day
A question was asked whether compliance with the special use permit or determining whether the
water consumption is above or below the 400 gallons of water per site acre per day threshold could be
based on a periodic average.
County Code § 18- 24.2.2(13) requires a special use permit if water consumption exceeds 400
gallons per site acre per day. [n determining whether a special use permit is required, daily consumption,
rather than by a weekly, monthly or other periodic average, is the applicable standard. See, Board of Zoning
Appeals ex rel. County of York v. 852 L.L.C., 257 Va. 485 (1999) (zoning administrator could not, through
interpretation, vary from the clear ordinance standards which established density credits of 0°Io, 50°1/o and
100% and allocate a reduced density credit based on what the administrator determined was an appropriate
percentage under the circumstances; the Court said that if the board of supervisors had intended the zoning
administrator to "have such latitude, it would have so provided in the ordinance; such latitude may not
properly be created by administrative interpretation"). Once the special use permit is obtained, however,
measuring water consumption is not tied to the per day standard. Thus, special use permit conditions could
provide that they would become applicable once water consumption exceeded a specified amount that
could be determined on a per day, per week or other periodic basis, or a daily, weekly or other periodic
average. Likewise, a condition limiting water consumption could be based on a similar measurement
standard.
Restore`N Station
Tier 3 Groundwater Assessment
Groundwater Management Plan
TMP 5513-1
Crozet, Virginia
Prepared for:
Jeffries II LLC
P.G. Box 910
Crozet, Virginia 22932
October 3, 2008
Nick H. Evans PhD CPG
Virginia Groundwater LLC
4609 Burnley Station Road
Barboursville, VA 22923
Vincent Day
True North Environmental
1110 East Market Street
Charlottesville VA 22902
Altacllment F
Key Findings
Hydrogeologic unit: Piedmont Foothills
Groundwater availability zone: 111 —Class 2 (medium relative availabiiityj
Estimated daily groundwater withdrawal: 725 gallons
Estimated daily groundwater recharge to site: 2115 gallons
Site within groundwater sensitivity zone? Yes:
Contamination threats on record: 4 documented leaking underground storage
tank (LUST) sites within 1000 feet of the properly
Additional contaminant threats observed in field reconnaissance? None
Hydrogeologic conditions favorable to proposed use? Yes
Anticipated impacts of proposed use on existing users: None
Groundwater management plan: Implement runoff- neutral site development as
practicable.
Site Overview
The proposed development comprises about 4 acres located on the south side of
US 250 approximately 0.70 miles east of Route 64 (Figure 1) and is situated
entirely within the Stockton Creek watershed. There are no streams on the
property; however the property drains to the SOUth into a Swale that eventually
flows into an unnamed tributary of Stockton Creek. There is about 25 feet of relief
on the parcel. Land cover on the parcel is open field with mixed grasses and
weeds (image, below).
Land use on adjoining parcels
is residential and light
commercial business. A
convenience store is located
directly across Ratite 250,
north of the site. The Moose
Lodge is located on the
adjoining parcel to the west.
Adjacent land to the south is
occupied by residential
dwellings. The adjoining
property to the east is occupied
by a tree service company.
The applicant proposes to construct a convenience store and gas station_ This
facility would be served by a transient non - community water supply well, which
must be permitted in accordance with Virginia Health Department (VDH), Division
of Drinking Water. According to the project engineers, water consumption is
estimated to be approximately 725 gallons per day (documentation attached). A
site plan showing the proposed development layout and approximate land
disturbance is attached to this report. Runoff from the site will be controlled by
standard stormwater management practices.
Hydrogeologic Assessment
Bedrock geology
The parcel is situated within a bedrock formation described as biotite- muscovite
leucogranite gneiss on the 1993 Geologic Map of Virginia (Figure 2). This falls
within the Piedmont Foothills hydrogeoiogic unit, as defined in the Albemarle
County Hydrogeologic Assessment Summary Report of 2003, with Class 2
(medium) relative groundwater availability.
C -a
' 1
' x,l v-i. i`t ?�•� rr IInil �w , �� r��t. -�, ���',\ :1 •r j ��
Ir
Ip
, f e'n � � -'k. + _ � '.- 1117 ' �1 S11�Q •$ r �• 1 }, 7q: -. � � i•. y
[. r � �j. ; � Y sir \���r.,_`l�• ' f _ 7� � �� .� `/ ��Iyff - r.�." � ' +:' �� r
a't l �; J` • . � f— ' ���a � y— ?��- DD,�,�`` ii. �,r�� '� `fir-.. ��r ��
TS � � � 1 {� Ss � r1 �. •ti; •�l� � I � • �
_. �r ��'��� jj� y ..1� --�� y1 �7t ' i �•� ,'r •r � '-�• -7 � • �_ ,J � � I —•�� � Y�'jjl �J -��_
� •
aa
:iI -' •� r� sr 1 fir. `'1 f •1 L1 1r• l r'-"'F -'� ' •�` t^ �� '�! /' ,-� �` •,
{; �' • , +�I r ' �1� ;4` �S R y, - 47 :�•�� ~� ,� ] f CIS �'� t
�r�i}
Lo
1
kk r
y I + r �'
4_1 r'-
�
a� � � :�' �� ^� ���� _ ` � -rte•• �-_-� -;�` -_ •l. � �,-� �'�lj ,
14fj �• 1 'L 1 l ' t !,. 4 . i' r .•.: _ I ,l�r '� ', t
CY)
I � � J' i ►� �I1� rir— i ' }�.�"' :����� � � r� =� �•'A�,� l�,`Ir"I '1 � :�+Y• �•
N
P9
a
1-3
a�
@�z
UF d L
a
L7
�s
m c
R
O
N � Z
0
M
IF
SY A
7 C
am �
cn
[B @
n �
1
i
kt ,
cn —n
3
0 C
CD
[{� IV
0
n to
0
0 0
=(0
0 n'
-4 3
iz Ul o
my
CD
3
N
CD
0
C
n�
Q
S
CU
mol
0
0
r-r
(D
cn
Bedrock fracture density and water well woductivit
The bedrock underlying this property does not contain primary intergranular
porosity through which groundwater might flow. Instead, groundwater flow is
confined to bedrock fractures and fissures.
No significant linear features, fracture traces or structural features were identified
on air photos or other maps in this study that would be useful indicators of
bedrock fracture orientation on this parcel. No bedrock exposures were
observed on the property during field reconnaissance. In the absence of good
bedrock exposures with which to directly observe bedrock fractures, the yields of
randomly -sited water wells can be used as a proxy for fracture density. Table 1
summarizes data from 52 wells in the current county database that were
constructed in the same bedrock formation as underlies this property.
Table 1: domestic water well statistics from Albemarle County database
Geologic reap unit Yield total fel! depth casing ! n gth count
[canons I]er minute) feet) t)
Ygh average: 9.6 average: 186 average: d2 52
(biotite- muscovite maximum: 60 maximum: 741) maximum: 142
leucogranite gneiss]
There are ten wells in the Albemarle County database that are within 2500 feet of
the property (Figure 3). Data from those wells are reported in Table 2.
Table 2* Data for wells
total depth (feet)
1 85
Asa
280
84
55
1 80
230
225
55
80
bemarle database) within 25013 feet of proposed develo
acing length (feet)l yield (gallons per minute)
53 1 6 ..
nt
32
12
_
8a
10
-7
55
6
�.
2
40
7
'-
56
0
I _
45 j
10
25
-
�x
7
rn
K
v �
m o
0 m
o CD
a�
v
ro
■
m 0
CD x
m'
-O co
Q Q
0 v
cn �-
z
0
0
�J
.-r
Q
CD
Q
0
J
CQ
C_
CD
W
CD
Q
(D
CL
cn
O
CD
3
CD
0
to
W
F
Overall, the data indicate that local biotite- muscovite Ieucocratic gneiss bedrock
is favorable for groundwater development in terms of fracture density. However,
the success of a water well drilled at a given location still depends on whether or
not the well intersects water - bearing fractures. A dry hole results if no water -
bearing fractures are encountered at the chosen drilling site.
Soils and saorolite
According to published sails mapping (USDA Soil Conservation Service. Soil
Survey of Albemarle County, 1985), the site is underlain by two variants of the
Hayesville Loam �37B & 37C) and the Braddock Loam (7B) (Figure 4).
Hayesville soils are deep, well drained soils weathered from the gneissic parent
material. These soils occupy the side slopes of the site. Permeability and
available water capacity are moderate. Surface runoff is medium and erosion
hazard is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is }ow.
Braddock soils are deep, well drained and weathered from alluvial fan deposits
that capped the residual underlying soils and saprolite. Permeability and
available water capacity are moderate. Surface runoff is medium and erosion
hazard is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate
The soils on site have the potential to contribute favorably to groundwater
recharge where land cover does not inhibit infiltration of rainwater.
Figure 4 Soils mapping in the vicinity of TMP 558 -1
363 Hayesville Ivaco,
8 - 7% 51ope
3703 Hayesville clay roam.
7 - 15% slape
78. Braddock losm.
2 - 7% slope
wirce. 11S Oevorn orA W Ayr sulltmi
5011 ConeeTVBI (1rI %WVICO. SONI Swvey
of AWrnane Goal ty, W9nra 1985
Groundwater flow recharge and discharge
The property is situated immediately south of a drainage divide between
Llckinghale Creek drainage to the north, and Stockton Creek to the south (Figure
5). Groundwater flow across the parcel is estimated to be generally in a
southerly direction- Ultimately, groundwater at shallow levels discharges into an
unnamed tributary of Stockton Creek on adjoining parcels to the south, and into
Stockton Creek proper.
Groundwater sensitivity
Contaminant threats
The proposed development does coincide with areas of recognized groundwater
sensitivity according to Albemarle County studies and databases that were
assembled during the 2003 Albemarle County Hydrogeologic Assessment,
Phase II {Figure 6).
There are 4 leaking underground storage tank (.LUST) sites within 1000 feet of
the property (Table 3). Due to the proximity of these LUST sites, the applicant
will need to test the well for presence of volatile organic compounds (VQC) in
accordance with Albemarle County ordinance 05 -E(t) prior to issuance of a
building permit.
..... .. .. __ ._ - -_- .. ._ . -. ,._.. ... .. ... -. -.. .. ... .. ��....�,� - .�:ft�.n•. .:,. x.�aSq:9'ije +.�•r- ...�-•1•.�wyy:;^ "- [r'{i.
Table 3: LUST sites.within 10 00 feet � ; "' � �' �. •a
�t or MF 55 -�� (source: Virginia fl�Q- database) ..- . �`�: _i:::•; � �...` ::,.4'y�.��:��t;.:'`w,.:;r;;`�.
PCNUM
;:RST I❑
RST NAME
RST STATUS;
.RST SUSP.EC ::;_."
"-.•:MANSE. - .'.
LATITUDE;,:
LONGITUDE
FAC t iADOR
19?391ng9
' 120
Brownsville Market I
Closed
1 5n5peCted
Albemarle Count
38.0495792
- 78.7'017691
5995 Rucktsh Gap Tpke
T9995097
2562
Brownsville Market
Closed
Confirmed
Albemarle County
1 38.04993969
-78 7096539'
1 5995 Rockfish Gaze Tpke
1x995094
2559
Rid 2e Mini Market
Open
Confirmed
Aibemare Counry
38 0497037
-78.71274657
6098 Rockfish Gap Tpke
15975528
222(8
Munger Well
Closed
Confirmed
Albemarle County
35 04942562
-78 7'1722 ?49
6254 Feillsboro Ln
There are approximately 29 existing drainfields, locations inferred from air photos
and field reconnaissance, within 2500 feet of the proposed development (Figure
3). Few if any of these are tip hydrologic gradient from the property, and none
are considered to pose contaminant threats to the property under normal
circumstances.
Threats to existiElg users of roundwater
The proposed development anticipates using a maximum of 725 gallons per day
in kitchen and bath facilities {documentation attached). This proposed
withdrawal of groundwater is not consumptive- to the extent that wrtually all of
this water will be returned to the ground as recharge through a drainfield.
(13 L)
a)
Ca
Q-0-0
Ilk-
j
ti
All
vil
• LO
LO
2i
el
1,0
CIP
LO j
---C,47
LL t
i ray' �pr,�_ r L' � }.�• �'� -I
{
14x1 l
•� . °��i a -_ :� i�•�a- �. ��- _ •:� - , '�f _ . � � � o
1 f ;rf 1 • _tea- ��- _��.__�� i � '', ' � � �r`• Q•• ❑-
CD
CD
CD
n * ci x r� rl - '�t
�_, : ❑ fit,
Via' " r ' ^� YN ti i .1 r ❑ V/
co
1 •�� + ��I l � ty .J�:• 1 rL� rr + r'� 1'•■ rN. n N S1}
CD cn
f{ _ . • — ����r•• -=�R, � f �r r � -, � }n' ' � it (/] �
��( '.` -- :r�• � � % _ �� � s � �J' �, �w ` ,1' ' �. a�- to
_ �� lU����� -• i(\ �[w.�' �-, r� f �, m f r,T ?' ' . 't" � t x- n� . .Er/ %J CD
Ul
CD
CD
R it w . t �� 1 l � �4ti.� � iYi � "•._ 'a- ��
g r F-0. j� r-
'*—� 1 +- � -���• '�`, �T I �� -� \� -�rE-- � �; �• ,� R�-��,`, p
;a' % �( -n .v= r—= ' " ~��.r-`. -- '•- ��i~;9 -:•y= `�t� ����. ^�: .f `��`��r,'�~•.1,�. �f� � '• °'• .�ryti C31
�� -'1 •I � i 1 � � I'• ^r � �Y . -� '.i: -i •'xy -'j]1. I n+ ri � s
•} _ • ! jar i 1, �.:' � -. � � l • � :'_.
,fix �I =�,� v - S• { %,rf _.SY' -� �,, ,�- ', -_ y�� -��, �-
A conservative estimate of groundwater recharge for the site is on the order of
2115 gallons per day (calculations below). Available recharge is more than
adequate to supply the proposed withdrawal of 725 gallons per day.
It is not anticipated that groundwater withdrawal of this magnitude will impact
existing wells on adjoining parcels or elsewhere in terms of groundwater supply.
The proposed use does not pose threats of groundwater contamination under
normal circumstances.
Water budget estimate for site
Annual precipitation: 46 inches
Conservative estimate for percentage of precipitation contributing to groundwater
recharge: 15%
Annual groundwater recharge: 6.9 inches
Daily groundwater recharge: .0189 inches = .0016 feet
Daily recharge per acre: .0016 feet X 43560 square feet per acre = 69.7 cubic
feet
Gallons recharge per day per acre: 69.76 cubic feet X 7.48 gallons per cubic
foot = 521 gallons per day per acre
Gallons per day recharge over entire site: 521 gallons per acre X 4.06 acres=
2115 gallons per day
Predicted groundwater withdrawal on site: 725 gallons per day
Reserve wellfield
If the primary well fails due to contamination or lack of water, it will be necessary
to develop another water source. The options for locating a second well will be
limited by the size of the parcel and required set -backs from drainfields, parking
lots etc.
Dedicated Monitoring well
Due to the small size of the property, this would probably not be an appropriate
location for installation of a dedicated monitoring well.
Groundwater management plan
The proposed development will seek to minimize degrading groundwater
recharge by implementing runoff - neutral site design and storm water
management strategies that minimize offsite runoff.
Submitted by Nicholas H
October 3, 2008
s, CPG # 2801 001041
DEPARn MENT c7 ?PIOFESSIGNAL AND OCOUPAi-IONAL
_ CaMMON►IVEAL 14 OF VIP GIN IA
XPIRFS 671 -
3600 ',`Jest broad Sheet. Rlclimonsi, `JR .J 22fl
VVR' -3ER j
Q8- 31 -2OQ9 Telephone. 1 (004) '•67 -9500
i
I]
2801 001041
BOARD FOR GEOLOGY
CERTIFIED AS A PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGIST
NICHOLAS H EVANS
4609 BURNLEY STATION ROADS
BARBCURSVILLE, VA 22923
�o,neee+. e - a *.a nr.ua!r..�n.r.nnr.. -., .•.
la p:eocr, aiecow
:SEE E'YEESE 510E FOR BALE Aq OiOR Re6Rp9y CkA N3 E1
w!
-=--a - - ------- - - - - -- :::I
d � � y;_..�y�y � � 1 - is ���- _ fir. -. . ��r'a�•.,: � . �
� I � ` � i sti.. � � `may � � F FCUirry LAM1IE~ _• ..��� - - ' -
• y —�; '•y� •�'I+Ti1iF•�1 �- F- F�.F�I,l, 1 +-i � � ��` �I�L• - --
y 1� g --.••" I
�j I � l I� -4 1 fl
l l{ I I• €' �,. '',� '
'jj -��' � i y � I I I I� I I 14 •J dt { I 1• ��� ,�.
1re1
�;I.; o •�. it
' � I I j -•1 i 1� r. g
_ "•r� I � 1 y� .�-� 11Ji1 I l 11a' I
*i.T11lIiI1FJ. II11�li. +,
SS N� I I l I I I_•i 1 I h
'I �� � I••{ 1 111 111 1 I � urc�rl L 'r I -.I• I I I s- i I d 'I�' ��
I �.'.� ii! nn I +q I I 1 I r 1 I I I �m •�: -r '11 I I 1 -;•r +'r !_ .'� if��
ok
1 Ili I I III
I }I 1 1 1 1 ifill, itl I i I i I I I p I I 1 I I
•'�' ��' i I I I I I . ��
� y F' �� ! 1 � I FF1� •k 1 }� 1I I �,F�'•I ,' -nr. �• g�•� - Q�_: e::'�•
n1
weyes•e�sWS - -- ri
i11 4 - - - -_ _
F.:
N
A L
SRAPIrIL SCALE 1'•40 M ";!full o. WIIM
c7 b. amx
kD 80 '20
11110
IUI
eo��n
ZxJ
❑ " Lu
H CL
a }a
z 0m
LLI Fn *'
F
A�Q
LLJ f!7 x g x
CZ m
x
4
a � �
s
K
r. om"n
wP a o�
e� F �n
�F1t
r..• 1•••40'
gm.
C -1
+ae1
OF !
u4s� .e
[_ltd Domdzion Engineering
Josh Rubinstein. Groundwater Manager
Albematic County Community Development Office
401 Mcintnrc Ruad, North Wing
Chnrlotresti ilh:, %'A 22902 -1596
October 3, 2008
SUBJECT: RE- STORE'N STATION ESTIMATED WATER USAGE
Property Owner.. Jeffries 11, LLC
l7_operty Address: 6115 Rockfish Gap Tnpk, Crozet, VA
Acreage: 4.06 acres, TM 55B -1
Albumarlc County
Properrs, Use
The proposed use for the property is a 600 square foot convenience store and deh'With gas pwnps.
Average Batty W:hter UUsag r
Water usage data was ohtntnt:d fnr Five sttnifar Facilities. Each of them have a convenience store, deli and gas
pumps. Based on this data, the average water usage was 725 gpd. The facility most similar to the Re- Store'N
5l -all on in terms of site and location is the Brownsville Market whose average water usage was 648 gpd.
i-inwevcr, far the Re- 3tore'N Stauon, the more comprehensive average of 72.5 gpd will be used. This water
usage 3 far less than 2000 gallons per day. -k Tier ill Groundwater Assessment is adequate fnr the proposed
proiect and no special use permit will be requarcd.
Shawn below is the actual water usage data and the locations of the sim1 ar Facilities.
GAS STATIONS WITH CONVENIENCE AND FOOD TAKE OUT SERVICE
Water used In galtons 1 month
Date
Liberty
Shell
Shall
SP [Ralkin)
Brownsville
IRT29 & Airport
Rdy IRT29 $ Grdenbrierl f RT250 Free Bridge]
RTZ50
Market
Nnv -07
20.200
24,100
18.E+00
20,100
16,000
Od-07
24.300
22,100
20,500
211300
17.600
Sep -07
21.300
19,500
23.100
23;300
22.000
Aug -07
23,000
27,600
27.800
23,-108
19,400
Ail-07
22.400
23.100
16,50D
2430D
19,500
Jun -07
28.900
26,300
13.700
26,300
22,300
May -07
28,000
26.5100
14.800
25.100
21,100
Apr -U7
23,300
26.300
10,400
19,200
21,400
Mar-07
14.900
23.500
15.80D
22.000
20,000
Feb -07
15,Bn0
23.500
23.100
18:300
18,000
Jari -07
17.200
21,900
'18.300
24;300
16.000
Dec -06
19.200
30.700
10.300
30.200
Ave Gall Month
29,542
24,683
19,650
23,458
19418
Avr_rage watt:r
usage cif all fa{ibties 'ts 21,750 gallons pei ,nonth or 7 25 gallons per Jay,
Octuher 3, 2008
The water used a the Facility will he for food preparation and sanitary uses. Vtrtu2uy a-U v;a'e: used sn [his
fasttir/ will be returned to the sate as treated was tewuter effluent into the onsite wastewater 1 iispasa] system and
uittrnately for groundwater recharge.
Sinrcrc[ti;,
NLdtae] Craun PE
Old Don- dm'orn Engineering
2036 Forest Drive • Waynesboro, Nrr122980
PHONE (540) 942 -3600 • FAX (540) 213 -02'17
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT LIMITED LC
January 5, 2009
To: Glenn Brooks, County Engineer
Josh Rubinstein, Groundwater Manager Albemarle County
From: Jo Higgins
RE: Re- Store'N Station SDP 2008 — 154
Attachment & Information —
1 Comparison Table - This table shows the comparable convenience store locations across the top
arranged based upon the gallons per day from left to right - lowest to the highest. Re- Store'N Station
has been inserted between Brownsville Market and Shell "Stop in Fond',' 129 Richmond Rd. Re-
Store'N Station will have the same water fixtures as the Shell with the exception of exterior spigots. Re-
Stcre'N Station water usage will exclude exterior water usage(washing of sidewalks or watering
landscaping).
2 Table of Convenience Gas Store Locations in Albemarle County - 7 locations. This table includes the
specific information on each site. The square footage is from the County Assessor information. The
"traffic" information is the vehicle trips per day per VDOT's latest information. The number of pumps,
seating, and water devices was compiled from site visits. This information is used in the Comparison
Table (Attachment 1).
3. Gas Station Water Usage — This is additional water meter data provided by Albemarle County Service
Authority for period Nov 07 to Nov 08 (Months) which includes 7 locations (2 locations were added at the
suggestion of Josh R. (and others). Locations that have a car wash were excluded. Locations that have
a full restaurant ie Wendy's. Dairy Queen etc_ were excluded. The basic data from ACSA is across the
page gallons totaled. gallons per month, and gallons per day on the right hand side of the sheet. This
information is used in the Comparison Table (Attachment 1).
4. Copy of Email dated 11512x09 from Terri Knight of ACSA that goes with the Water Usage data
(Attachment 3) provided.
5. Letter (2 pages) Dated Oct 3, 2008 from Old Dominion Engineering to Josh Rubinstein — "Subject: Re-
Stare'N Station Estimated Water Usage" — This was submitted as part of the Groundwater Study done by
Old Dominion Engineering. The water meter data from Albemarle County Service Authority from Dec
06 to Nov 07 for 5 Gas Stations with convenience and food take out service locations was provided. The
average water use based upon this data is 725 gallons per day. These specific locations were selected
because they are located on busy roads in the County growth area where the water is metered and
provide similar food service to Re- 5tore'N StaOon. This information was deemed adequate by the
County when submitted. Due to the need to further substantiate that the water usage wi11 not exceed
1624 gallons per day, additional informations has been requested.
This data is presented to demonstrate the following things:
1. The average water used by gas station convenience stores in the area is 969 gpd.
This is based upon 7 locations. (This excludes restaurants and Gar wash)
2. That the "core" water volume used for gas station convenience stores in the area is in
the range of 630 — 798.
3. That there is no relationship between water usage and pumps, size of store, parking
or traffic on roads at specific locations.
104 Ana Marie Blvd, Waynesboro, Virginia 229BO 434 — 326- 0334 (fax) 434— 326 - 0334 Page 1
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT LIMITED LC
4. That Re- Store'N Station water usage will be approx. 725 gpd which is well under the
volume allowed by -right at this site which is 1,624 gpd.
The original analysis of 5 convenience store locations was expanded to include 7 convenience store
locations. Based upon the Comparison Table. it is evident that there is a direct relationship between the
average gallons per day and the water devices installed a! each location. There are specific water devices
installed at each location which establishes the 'core" water usage whi -.h are either required by building code
or are provided based upon the "take out" food operation. In addition to these water using devices, there are
locations that have a nigher water usage because of having an ice maker and/or dishwasher in the operation.
These same locations have more than 15116 seats also. In one case. the store serves as a'commissary" to
B other locations. With respect to size of store versus water usage, there is one of the largest stores (4188sf)
that uses the highest volume (1558 gpd) but the smallest store (2525sf) uses the second highest volume
(1191 gpd). The second smallest store 12628sf) uses the lowest volume (630gpd). There is no direct
relationship between size and volume. Regardless of fixtures or size of store. the average water
Used is 969 gpd.
Based upon the Comparison Table, there may be a secondary relationship between the number of seats and
the water usage. As mentioned above, there are 3 locations with more than 15 -16 seats. The water usage is
greater than 1000 gpd at these specific locations. This may be attriouted to having more customers spend time
in the store which means the restroorn facilities are used more. This is considered in the average
Although it has been perceived that size of the store may affect water usage, the basic kitchen area is similar
in each convenience store that serves take — out food (these are not fast -food restaurants). The core water
usage is very similar regardless of building size. The non- kitchen area that is dedicated to convenience items
from band aids to xmas lights varies greatly from store to store.
Conclusion — related to Re- Store'N Station —
In this new convenience store that is located away from other retail shopping, other products such as
specialty grocery Items, cooler Case items, seasonal items and car items such as wiper fluid & small hardware
items will be allocated more interior space than stores located near other retail. due to the need to avoid
outdoor display on the EC (which is not allowed without a permit), the specific location of Re- Store'N Station is
anticipating more space to be interior display. The Owner has chosen to build a 6,003 sf first floor with 1,000
sf of Owner occupied office space above. This store is sized to include interior display spaces and more cold
box storage which will reduce the number of delivery trips necessary to stock the store. None of the
expanded extra interior space will affect the water usage because it will not be used for water using devices.
This can be verified when the building plans are submitted for review and permitting.
As part of the sustainable design, the site design for Re- Store'N Station Includes a "rain box "_ The root drains
from the building and from the canopy will he piped into a tank then pumped to re -cycle the storm water run-
off so it can be re -rased to water landscaping and keep the exterior sidewalks clean. This will virtually eiiminate
the storm water runoff that is required to be controlled. This can be verified when the Final Site Plan is
submitted for review and approval.
Since the site has adequate area for a future building, the building design will include a well water meter so
records of water use can be maintained to document the exact water usage and provide supporting data to
evaluate how much of the 1,624 gpd will remain available for future uses. This information will be available
to the County once the store is operational.
Based upon the information submitted, Re- Store'N Station will use much less water than the allowable limit of
1,624 gpd. There is no basis to establish that the by -right allowable limit will be exceeded.
If you have any additional questions, please advise.
104 Ana Marie Blvd, Waynesboro, Virginia 2 24$0 434 -- 326 - 0334 [fax] 434 - 326 - 0334 Page 2
Comparison Table l ,f
typical code requirements - mop sink, small hand sink, 1 men sink & toilet, 1 women sink & toilet
Note 1- Serves as commissary for 6 other "Market" locations
Note 2 - Some may have ATM's inside but this convenience store includes a detached Sank branch - VNB
Based upon the data provided - the "care" usage for convenience gas store is based upon water devices that
each location has and possibly related to seating, The core usage is between 630 - 798,
The locations that use more than the "core" amount have water devices that are high water users -
such as dishwasher or ice maker or both.
All have 1 to 3 - ext. spigots a yard hydrants to wash the sidewalk & pump area and watering landscaping.
No direct relationship can be shown between the sq Ft, number of gas pumps or traffic at the location.
This data shows a direct relationship between the water useage and water using devices.
This data may show that locations with over 15 seats uses more water possibly because
the customers that use "seating" may use the restroom facilities at a higher rate of frequently.
Re- 5tore'N Station will have water devices like Shell or Like Brownsville with I add'l men, ladd'I women toilet.
Fie- Store'N Station water use will not include washing the sidewalk or watering landscaping.
BP/Liberty
Brownsville
Re- Store'N Sta. 'Shell
BP /Pantop
Shell
bellair
Exxon
Owner
L5F -5 Cay.
HE&J Inc.
Jeffries 11
Stop In Food
LSF -5 Cay.
Stop In Fond
Tiger
Tiger
Location
3470 5ern
Rockfish
Rockfish
1129 Rich
241 Rolkin
1220 Sem
Ivy Rd
3455Sem
Total 5q. Ft
2628
4200
7,000
3497
3169
3497
2525
4188
Pumps
6
4
7
6 pumps
7
7
3
5
Traffic
39,000
10,000
10.000
52,000
52,000
57,000
14,000
39,000
Seats
15
15
15
1 16
16
1 24
26
22
Gallons Per bay
630
656
656 -725
798
823
1125
1191
1558
Water devices
I Lg Pan sink
x
x `�
x
x
x
x
x
x
Men Toilet
2
x
2
2
2
x
2
Men Sink
x
x
x
X
2
2
x
2
Wom Toilet
2
x
2
?
2
2
x
2
Worn Sink
x
x
x
x
2
x
2
1mop sink
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
1 sm kit sink
x
x
i` x
x
x
x
x
x
coffee
2
3
x
_
4
2
x
3
Fountain
Ig
x
�x
x
Ig
Ig
IV
Ig
I ce Tea
ice coffee
w�
x
x
rappucino
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Juice
x
x
x
water fountain
x
Ext. Spigot
2 bldg
2 yard
0
2 bldR
X
h
.
2bl/2yd
Ice maker
0
X
x
x
x
Dishwasher
0
x
ice: cream sink
>:
x
Employee toilet
x
x
Employee sink
x
x
Other
I
1
1
1
1
1
jNote2
lNotel
typical code requirements - mop sink, small hand sink, 1 men sink & toilet, 1 women sink & toilet
Note 1- Serves as commissary for 6 other "Market" locations
Note 2 - Some may have ATM's inside but this convenience store includes a detached Sank branch - VNB
Based upon the data provided - the "care" usage for convenience gas store is based upon water devices that
each location has and possibly related to seating, The core usage is between 630 - 798,
The locations that use more than the "core" amount have water devices that are high water users -
such as dishwasher or ice maker or both.
All have 1 to 3 - ext. spigots a yard hydrants to wash the sidewalk & pump area and watering landscaping.
No direct relationship can be shown between the sq Ft, number of gas pumps or traffic at the location.
This data shows a direct relationship between the water useage and water using devices.
This data may show that locations with over 15 seats uses more water possibly because
the customers that use "seating" may use the restroom facilities at a higher rate of frequently.
Re- 5tore'N Station will have water devices like Shell or Like Brownsville with I add'l men, ladd'I women toilet.
Fie- Store'N Station water use will not include washing the sidewalk or watering landscaping.
Location
Food (Fuel
Service +Pumps
Fixtures
Iparking
Ext. Spiem 'SF Bldg !Spaces !Seats 'Water Li se Details:
[[ ec i -Nov r vP
(based uoan 12
months ACSA data
Fa kPa - Semnipke a s
rport he Me rke:" 'S numps
i
11 LG Pan sink
2 on bldg :4.laadf 34 Spaces
I
122 seats wp Ise Maker • nol typical
3455 5em ripla Ira.'
I2 talem &2 sink:
12 yerd hynrenrs Co. Asses Aecards
I _ "Market' iecatwn is cvmmissarf to
146.7541m [588 gad !
SJS LTD Corp
11 sm Knchen sink
•6 other Market stores.
TM32 -36F
IMachmes • 3 toffee,
'Sam to loom louen at 68 m;
'
_
Cwtl it'TiNfr"
fMarhnw •L6 In unta+n
jdrink
lee Tea machine
_
"Mud House " /ceppuomn
find juice uer
r
6 ournps
2 tollets & 1 mnk Irnenl 2 on bid@
x3,9481mo 79B gad y
Shell I.ree Eindgel 'The Nlarka:
2,709 sl 115 spaces
16 seats
1179 Richmond Ad
2 lanets g 1 wrk lwomenj
(Co•Aiim. Retards]
TM78.17x1
Mop 5mk
ASSUME 10 Pan Ardr
pS5UMF 3 kil. Sm sink
I water lountem
rhocolbie
11 Dble Coffee — -- —
—
0 founia in arink
cappuLlnc
isP /ubeny
114 A %a Minnie [SU.
lAirwrt Rd
ahmple Sub:
6 Purnps
]2 tol]ets & 1 sink lawn;
I]
IAPprox.l.;2a
2 Dn oldg 11a6SF Stor.aldg
20 ml + 5
15 seen
LB,9001n+o G30 gad
TM3Z•3782
2 totlets & 1 sink
�Ivrotnenl
I7atai5F=2,628J
LSFS Caraher 4rvesl.
iLG Pan sink
lCo. Asses. Rem rds]
!Kitchen ham sink
IMischines - 2 eoftee
,I IG is untsim drinks
iI ice coffee
I
11 CaaJiucinp
I
shell -1220 Semuiole
at Gmenbner Rd
61W-03-12
Smp•instwp
-subway Sub
1 pumas :2 toiiets&2 sinks Imeril
1 yard loi bldg
3457 sf r1U suaccs+4
20 seats
ice Maker
33i880/mo 1129 god
2 1nllers&2
-slnkstwomenl
Ca. Asses Retards
I4 autslde seals
-J. LG Pan si A
!
imap sink
1
A sm. Kitchen sink
iMsechmes -1 ice ter
U camuSlpe
IL juice
_
Il LN121 fountain drink
:2 Coffee
:ICE MAXER
Brownsville Market
5995 RockllsnGap T
Deli Style
41kumps i1 Wets& 1 sinkslment
2 yard hyd
2,6msr•is, fir
!
IApp1. 20
some
.Appr. 15tpi.6: tabiesi
196WIMO 656gpd
T_M558 -19
11 IyHets& 1 unksMoml
1,5%sf - Hr Imt marked
:1 lobe[ Iernaloveel
_
_7rd
set County Anessor Records
I
3 tG Parks, nk
total of 4.20011
_
-mop sink
I .1 sm. *tshenvnk
i Mrchines- R coffee
I
i 1 sm. Coffe bar sink
it lounisain (paimI
;2 co flee
BeBair
' 1 sm. sl n u icy me m
he Markel
1pump5 i2toilets -m/W
Z3 65 - 15c -2 5 251
3D maces 26
lee M_ aker
35331/mo. 1191god
_
7401 lyv Rd _
f Cahmg ir'tige'
i2 rand sinks rrVw
!11G pan sink
IFForn Cu- nis u; keeerdi
!fAsnrrasher
1 ext bktg has peen added
JVNB • min, branch
rmdp llnk
Iso tataiof 24G5sf
r sm. (mudhousaj sink
I VA:hbm s•Lg fountain
IdnnYs
_ —
-
2 edftee
!7. sod ne Imud huusel
B—P Partbops
7 pumps
I 2to11ets- —rni—w
3,169sf
r. marked
16
lw?eUker
24,70/rno 823 gpd
741 Rvhnn Rd
12 sinks rn/w
Co. Arses 160
unmark
TM76.74
14
coffee
I Lg drink
L LC Pan sink
1 iulce
1 �appuclno
Liberty pantoo ICAR
WASH
16677 %111 &2 sto ryt
SO seas
guesstimate
198.700/rpa h,623gpg
UO ROW Rd
6,224 sf
8G0sf Car wash
Full restaurant
INCi. CAR WASH
Twa -76
t,51306 $1 ranopI -M2)
SF owner
Texaco IGr aenbiwo ICAfi
From Cal- Asses. Records
WASH
345,6S101mo 493sgpd
INCL• Car Wash
oci r� v� m rn
r q �
E
C C
w
V 'J
A
L a°
C N N P N
v v o v v m
4
r�vmmv�n
- ,- mmm� - 0
i
,n v
incmen m,an
i?=
�i��mvv 0
'F
Q Q
p
fG�1 � N 4f�i Ily�pyil W
y�
FC C
¢ Q
oci r� v� m rn
r q �
E
u
C N N P N
4
i
C CCOPl4�G
h
'F
p
fG�1 � N 4f�i Ily�pyil W
y�
J Vpp
e
W
O
IL Am�yy V 0a �p
Oa I�H
MNM
Iw
1fl1r1
y
o s s
pfl
W
u% P
-N�{fl 4p]
Q
F
i
Q7 CL
(D tm
..
LL,
N
a
FR 'R
y
uarcfn
ti
a o °o °o
rv� R
U:
nn� 7�--n�
o = m
2
{q X
3
u 4C
C
¢
Lu m
o a o 0 o a o
aaap@aoo
y
..
i17
M-
°p °oo�—
=�cP °,
07
N D
1
� �
c
d
G
_
[p
L
>% 03
mW aSSgSgB
ca o
m0 2
NN�4 =''""
OL
1
z ea LL
C
W
¢ r °rWv
R s pp G G C
o M d G
--mitr r-m
Q �
Z
Q
6 C O O Q 9
D
•�
N w„im
pNN
Q
CN1 N N N Y N
�
d
P
0
Y
a �
r
N
v
� � F 't
P
d
p
n p N C Ca O CO
v�
d
¢
o
.,
i,E u.E E
C - W E
wpb
ace v� pia wit
w
a
N
O 0, N u, N
_
s�
toy 5mL] M
LL
tjY.
C
1
W K
N q
N w
C
L m
d
E
E
b
T F
W $
g
Gin
G c
dJ S
F
ILN � •�uaLL
CJ r
F �i NJrsn
f
Page 1 of i
Subj, 1220 Seminole Trail - Stop In Food Stores
Date: 11512049 1.21:52 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From: tkni f aySennoeaeithority c�rc
To' Musx�l�aol.corr
Jo
For the above address the consumption was higher than average for billing periods in June, July, anc August
2008 due to a water leak in the external service line.
If you need further information please co not hesitate to contact me.
Terri M. Knight
Customer Service Supervisor
Alhemarie County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, VA 2291'
(434) 977 -4511 ext. 107
tknig.nt serviceauthority.orc
Mo ?.tdai,, January 05, 2009 AOL: Musxit
r— ..- — —
CU Ponunion Engincerrmi g
October 3, 2W8
josh Rubinsrun, Graundwattt ilan:agu
Albemarie Couato Community Drvr+np_ -n= Office
4.)i hlclntirc Roid, NorL %'ung
Chatiarttsville, �?? 229"591€2
SUBJECT: RE— STORE'N STATION ESTIMATED WATER USAGE
Property Clutter JttMx3 -11 I1.0
Prap_r,y Address 613 lUxk.frsh Crap Tnpk, Creact, N'A
?t.rcaZc: 4.06 actct, Thi 538 -1
Libe=Lt County
Properrr Use
—ac proposers asr for the prope:r}- is a 6GOO square foot convenivice store 2nd deb wvh g 1s pumps.
Average Dai11- Waarr Usage
Water usage data was obtained for five almilas kcibues. Each of than i19ve s tonvCnieacr store, dLh and yeas
pumps• Based on ,hi s dare, for average water usage was 7rn gpd. The facdir} most saa111. to the Fin- 5tore'N
5tzton Lv tams of size and locatio n is the Brown5v7it N12: tet whose 2vcrage water usag =eras ii48 gpd
Howe vex, for the Re- Store'N Smnon, thr more comprehenm" average of 725 gpd will a_ used. Tr%is urate
usage is far less than 2W.YJ gallons per day. A Tar III Grouted« -.ter Assessment is adequ.tst for the prop 0scd
praiec. and no speria; use permit will be requued
5hov.n bclow i= chr actual Hater usage data L--ui the iocan Pia s of The umkr faclues.
GAS STATIONS WITH CONVENIENM AND FOOD TAKE OUT SERVICE
Water used v pallorss 1 month
Gat@
Liberty
Shell
$!tell
SP IRolklrtl
Brownsvllic
{RT29 & Airport Rdj
{RT25 & Graonbrlarl
(117250 Free Bridge)
F7=
Markel
Nnv.a7
20Z0D
?4,700
18,500
23,•100
16.00
OCi-07
2d,3D0
3,1N
29,W
21,300
17,800
Sm-C7
21,300
15,600
22.7W
23;100
22.D00
ki� 7
23,000
27.601)
27'ax
27.)00
19,400
JuW7
22,40D
23,100
1B.SM
24 "am
19.600
Just -07
25,06
26.300
13.704
25.300
ZZ.340
mat-07
2 6.000
26.500
14,800
I5.4w
21,10A
Aor -07
2'2,300
25,300
18,400
19.204
21 ALVJ
Mar-C
14,$00
23.5W
U1800
."'i.,D00
20 AWJ
zeta"?
15,800
23,54n
23.100
.8.JU0
1B.0DG
Jan-l7
17,200
22,900
18.300
r4,90D
18,00c,
Dec-Ct
19.200
30.700
16.390
:91200
Ave Gall Month
21,542
24.689
19,6m
:2,456
19416
.'lvrsaht wAter usage of aH fatilsues ss 21,750 galinm per month or 725 tallnrns ri1Ir day.
IF
—2— ❑csobmx 3, 2008
i he water rued a t3it facility wit be fox food p- g3arTrion and switary uses. Vutualiy all Kale: used ut thss
iacdny ail! bt returned to the sire as treated wasiewater eff]utn¢ into the onstsc ttrasrewuer •fL.Lpps31 sr� rem and
ulumatclj for porridwates recftarp-
SinCGIGL', ''�' . 1•
I
i•tcb- a *. C raun P"
Old Dominion Engineering
2036 Foresr Dsrnc • Wa}•ncsVorc, VA 221960
PRONY. (540) 902 -56M • FAX { -W) 214297
January 20, 2014
Jeffries 1I_ LLC
cio Jo Higgins
2564 Mount Torrey Road
Lyndhurst. Virginia 1-2952
RE: Restore N'Station Tier ITI Addendum
In the Tier Ill Groundwater Assessment and Groundwater Management Plan for Re-
Store'N Station (T-NIP 5713-1) dated October 3, 2009 we estimated the groundwater
recharge at 2,115 gallons per days and the well water withdrawal rate at 725 gallons per
day.
This memo serves as an addendum to our original Tier Ill Groundwater Assessment as
we have evaluated a well water withdrawal rate corresponding to the VDH approved
septic system design rate of 1600 gallons per day (gpd)- or approximately 1 gallon per
minute (gpm).
Please consider the following:
1, Our original estimate of recharge was estimated very conservatively at 2115 gpd.
In reality the actual recharge rate will exceed this estimate.
2. Our original estimate a €so did not include the 725 gpd water usage as a recharge.
The vast majority of the well water used on the site will be treated then disposed
in the drainf:eid and ultimately serve as recharge.
3. Design loading rates for drainfields include a safety factor in excess of the
projected groundwater usage rate. in Virginia, this factor is typically 1.4 times
the actual average water usage rate We would anticipate the actual average water
usage will be close to 1,143 gpd with additional uses added to the development
increasing the water usage to 1,643 gpd.
4. Even with the withdrawal rate of 1 643 gpd. the number is still below estimated
average recharge of 2115 gpd.
in our best professional opinion, it is thought that a groundwater withdrawal of 1 643 gpd
(approximately 1.1 g7pm) will not impact the existing welts on adjoining parcels or
elsewhere in terms of groundwater supply. Furthermore, this usage does not pose threats
of groundwater contamination under normal circumstances.
118 Bun k ngham Circle, CharlatiesviHe. VA 22903 j 434.923,0688 ' Fax 434.923.0555 I www.truenorthenv.com
Addendum to Tier III True North Environmental
Restore `N' Station January 20, 2010
Limitations
The work performed in conjunction with this project, and the data developed, are
intended as a description of available information. Generally accepted industry standards
were used in the preparation of this report. Stated opinions and conclusions are not
intended as a guarantee and the only reliable way to confirm that a sustainable
groundwater resource is present is to drill and test a groundwater well for quantity and
quality.
True forth Enviromrental appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you with this
project. if you have any questions, please call me at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Vincent Day, PG
Geologist/Principal
2
�L
)L
Michael Craun, PE
Old Dominion Engineering
Page 1 of 2
Sub;- Re- STore'N Station - SUP
Date. 2/1712010 10 02:34 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From Musxft;aaol.co_m
To. sfrederick albem rle. .rci
CC: rhiQgins _ albemarle.org, nat. erkms mail com, Gbrooks�albgmigle.org, amcculle(i albemarle =ora,
Gram the albemarle. r , EECHOLS albemarle.or , amallekeDalbemarle org,
kboyd�7a aibemarle.org, dsnowC&albemarle.arg, dsrooker(&,earthlink.net, rive rstreet4444@yahoo.ccrn
BCC. don�rakgassociates. net, msprouse6iCnccwlldbluE.COm, rthomasalbernarie orq
Summer -
General statement - The target date to open Re- Store'N Station is not until January 2012.
We do have some time but we want to proceed in a timely manner. This property has been
zoned and assessed as Highway Commercial since at least 1980 and it is not a stand alone
property out in the rural areas. There are numerous properties in the vicinity along this stretch
of RT250 and that are outside the growth area on both sides and across the road that are non -
rural and non- residential uses. The stretch from the schools complex to 1 -64 does not have a
rural character on either side of RT250. With all the discussion about support for attracting
business to AC - this small business will contribute tax revenue to AC both with increased real
estate taxes and meal tax and will provide numerous jobs in the Crozet Area. Although it
doesn't count when it comes to planning & zoning, the property owner in this case grew up in
A C and has been a business owner for the past almost 20 years. For property already zoned as
Highway Commercial to be used for that purposes rather than be dormant will take pressure off
to rezone other properties or expanding the growth area generally. What is different about this
development when compared to the existing other 4 convenience store with gas sales to the
east & west is that they are unattractive and impact the EC because they were developed prior
to regulations which have evolved to govern landscaping requirements, lighting, parking,
access etc, The existing requirement as implemented will result in ":raising the bar"
as they were intended to do.
Over the past year. Glenn Brooks and Ron Higgins had both confirmed that "water" was well water
and does not include rainwaterfstonn water collected and diverted to water the landscaping plants. I
had asked this specific question of both Glenn and Ron to confirm this information. if staff is reversinct
a pre mise that has been used over the past yea r both i in the discussion pert@ inin to water use and
stormwater management. it is reasonable to re uest that an explanation be rovided. Per your letter, I
assume this is forthcomincl.
Getting the Feedback from Greg /County attorney's office is also important We met with Ron Higgins
and Greg last April and established that there were important questions related to this issue. One of
those questions being -how a special use permit could even be applied because if the water usage is
less than 1524 gpd then the threshold for requiringienforcing the special use would not have been
reached. Since we know that RS can operate successfully within the limitation, the fee and cost
associated with asking for a special use permit and all the staff time spent on this could all be a
waste. After repeated requests for this information. I received an email from Greg in December which
said he would be providing a response. I know everyone is busy but taking almost a year seems
excessive. In your letter. you advise this is forlthcoming.
One thing to confirm - The collection of rainwater will still be part of the stormwater management
design. It the rainwater collected is to be included in the 400 gallons per acre per day or 1,624 gpd
limitation, it will not be used to water plants. The system design will be detailed for no liner which will
allow the rainwater to seep through the walls of the underground raintank. Only a small percentage of
business properties in the area actually have landscaping irrigation systems and having one is optional
and not a requirement. Therefore. the information on water usage that has been submitted does not
need to be changed to include the gallons of storm water that may be used for watering plants if that is
what you are asking for
I assume another way this can be addressed is to include as part of the Special Use Permit to
allow the rainwater /runoff to not be countedlincluded in the gallons per day calculations. Using
rainwater to water plant materials is an optional activity and does not relate to the water usage that is
directly related to the plumbing fixtures inside the bldg. CollectioniHarvesting and Reuse of rainwater
is a practice that is a proven environmentally sustainable design feature that alleviates need for an
above ground open detention ponds which are a breeding ground for mosquito infestation and
Attachment C�
Friday. May 21, 2010 AOL. Musxit
Page Z of 2
have maintenance & liability issues. I have attached information about Rain Tank Stormwater Management for
your use.
Please consider this as a request to amend the Special Use Permit from 1 gallon per day (more than allowed
for 4.06 acres) and to re guest germission to water qlant materials without restriction provided the water source
is rainwater.
I also left you a message because you sent a schedule as an attachment which shows the earliest PC
meeting at March 1 st rather than March 15 (last year's schedule) but there are two items in your letter that say
are "forthcoming" The ending of your letter implies that a date is evident to "submit your revisions and
responses to review comments" but I need your input on the deadline to address comments. I do have a
response to Engineering's comment because it states the issue very well - water usage is a "function of
individuals and their water use practices" The water usage of a larger convenience store (over 1.000sf more)
with more gas pumps (8 instead of 7) such as the WaWa shows that a convenience store without water
restrictions can operate successfully with many more plumbing fixtures than Re- Store'N Station will
have. We will submit the internal plumbing fixture analysis if needed.
Your assistance is appreciated. Please advise
Jo Higgins
Project Development Limited LC
2564 Wormy Rd
Lyndhurst., Va 22952
434 - 326 - 0334
musxit a@ aol. com
Friday, May 21. 2010 AOL. Musxit
Rain Tank ',tonmwalir Klanagemimi
EMCD [01111e[ATIOM
Home Site map crAmr,l,
$c, -Ireh
February 17, 2030
Home
Company
Health and
safety
Products and
Segments
Showrooms
Service
Suppliers
Publications
aranch Map
Contact Us
Emco Online
Links
Job
Dpportunitles
;Onlarl
Rain Tank Stormwater
Management
E ■am I :e [Rownioads lConum
Overview
the Rain Tanis is a stttrsurface raerwaler
storage lank with nighty perrieadse
surfaces made up from manu!aclumd
niaduiar aarrponerns l; ra used'al-
SawCe' allowng -he apl!on ion - nf,Itrauon
aetarman 7r rMention With tl =ew t nigJe
characteristics. the Rain Tons- aids
designers in rnanaang stormwatar run-
off. reducing potrutants entering surlace
%vOWS• recharging 1Ot,-$1 aquifers aria
renewing pressure cn existing atarrawalar
systems
The Emco Rai n rank System ,s the
complete package of cornpan9nts you will
react to install a Rain Tank ncludog
"ineertrlg conrullat on ana on s,;e
instruction and snspechans. This pedeage
i6 tli'augh'. tayau using a s+'ncie co6Urr3 71 lark
I'•1•_ r I ,F -1
Since 2003 Emoe has been prov, ding Rain Yank so ;ubons for engirtee�s muricipslrtres. and
developers across the cauntry We have nu:netous rmlwiavans in @ntish C6Lrima Alperta are
Ontario iUr. protect exarnclas, To date. installed !arks range from as que as 2 m= to larger U'an
d. 000 nn:;- throe ss no !•nit to wna: you Car achieve in capaci ty
The awe o[ the Frond Rair Tank System is the ModUlar
Camoorents Ernm first brotrght you the ang ral Atlantis D.
Rain Tank module, designed in Austraim over 20 years ago
We are now also intrvdurrN the neat generation modular
system from Brentwood Industries - the 8 Dorm Tank
modixe • manufactured in North Arr:er-a. Both mo&-ar
components are mane horn recycled po5t•induMnal plastic,
wtilch is Par0culany imponanl if you are working on a
t.EEC'm Project
The Emca Rain Tank Systerr. offers a unique conihrrabon of
Rexitrls conFgural orrs ease a! nstarwition, rugr detention
capacity ^ugh mea.a oermeanrtity and IOW I31119-term
dogging factors• ar r one system It nos a wide range of
applscabons including ".mar parks and Time c4ireae noi:siliq
Sports WdS. =1 gardens, ate, Far the Same exc8r'atea
vaiurhe. an Emco Rain Tano. System car maneae a rot mope
water friar conventional nkltration methods - such as sand ;renGhes. 50aK away gravel pas
periaraiep or slotted oipe
hllp"'M �521
2.17 2filo
op
Rain 'I ant: SWrmKatk:r ivlanagemk:nt
Vagc ? of 4
Nth its sutrsafack de&gn the Emco Rair rank System Mai— airls envlrormenislly susta, ^able
urban developments It alleviates mosRullu Inlestauor-, am n7a•nrgnar+:R ?crab lily headacne9 teal
open detention ponds bring ahou: Fi;rMerrr.ere, tsy Installing under caning lo:s or landsceped areas,
devetdpers can Tree up land far amilronal revenue
For further Infortnatton please conb=yow tegcona. represernatrve
Emco Rain Tank System Package
T" Emccs Rain Tank System is a complete paL*age from Emco that rnCllldes the following prod.: s
and services
• E rig Ineenng caruultaean
• Project quotations
• Rain tank system matmals
• Mom Ior cDmponerrm
• Geotextlles geognd and liners
• Arlillary products
■
On site support for cpntractors
■
Site vlmlls during irc5lallatron
■ Post const=ton docurnenlacro^
• Post installation Camera Htspection fsubted to cw0tionsl • see examwes in m +s smart video
clip
This package is prolndea as a complete system bast;'1 - •:asUma
Rain Tank Projects
Featured Examples.
It ttp a vww.em col IdxLum)dclauit.aspx "id -- '_5? 1 2 17.1-0 l u
Rain I& Harveftig
e6111Milleftsinrshrr�. 1"CL
Damage from stormwater ruflt(r"-
The impact of urban development
Urban development has dramatically changed the m r
natura.Rain Harvest
syste of storwater runoff when It rains. Many of cur ❑ties r
have become concrete �unglesl Rainfall is directed rapidty by
roofs, roads, driveways and car parks into pipes and
Chan" eis. Instead of neon absorbed by vegetation and sod ar.❑
siawly dpscnarypng into creeks, stormwater runoff erodes creeks.
depas,tigg sediments and destroy!ng water nabItats and
Organisms.
Stormwater runoff causes sgnpfpcan: darnege to our Crccks aped
water„ ays
The benefits of rainwater harvesting
By col ectrng and stnnng rain water from roof, Rainwater
HarvEStina Systems reduce stormwater run -off taking
signnccant pressure off stormwater infrastructure ano the
envlrcnrnent. ThpS rreeanS:
ReruCed need for InvestmenL in S tor m via ter infrastfucture
{fewer, sma ter pipe S.ySteMS required]
Reduced Stormwater poll -tlon, ercispon and flofld nq
Reduced ma+nter.ance of stormwater rnfrastruttyp e i por d,.
wetlands and oollutant traps)
Our main uses of water
Page l of i
Subj: Re: Re -Store W Station SP
Date- 211512010
To: sfrederick ! emarle.or
Summer -
Since a key issue is monitoring water, I have attached the cut sheet for a proposed water flow meter
device. This model was recommended by Mike Craun the septic system designer.
Of course if you read Marcia Joseph's letter, the way to respond to the concerns that are raised - it
seems the best solution is to put Re- Store'N Station on a public water meter so the monitoring is
accomplished by ACSA rather than County staff.
Thanks
Jo Higgins
In a message dated 2/12/2010 4:42.10 P M. Eastern Standard Time, sfredericka@albemarle.org writes.
Please see attached for relevant documents.
Summer Frederick
Senior Planner, Current Development
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902 -4596
434.296.5832 x3565
sfrederick @albemarfe. org
Friday, May 21, 2010 A0L: Musxit
`MADGETECH
Features
High speed download
■ Miniature size
• Reusable
• Real -time operation
■ Programmable engineering units
■ Interfaces to pulse Output flow
meters and contact closures
• User- friendly
■ Low cost
Applications
• Remote counting and totalizing
■ Remote monitoring of contact
closures
■ Flow rate recording
■ Gas and water metering
■ Frequency recording
• Traffic studies
• Speedometer /rotational speed
indicators
■ Replace costly strip chart recorders
PULSE110
PULSE DATA LOGGER
Pull Recorder
Pulse110
w•a.
0 tc - urx
O to 100 Mr
i`MApGETECH t
The Pulsel 10 is a miniature, low -cost, recording device which senses
pulse inputs or contact closures from external sources such as
transducers andior pulse initiators and transforms them into usable
engineering units for the specified time period. The device can store
up to 16,383 readings. In addition, the Puise110 allows the user to
store user defined units such as gallonslmin in the device as well as
scale factors and offset values. This enables the user to easily scale
any transducer that provides a pulse or contact closure output to the
user required units. Once activated the Pulse110 senses and records
the number of pulses /contact closures that occur over the user
selected period. The device's real -time clock ensures that all data is
time and date stamped. The storage medium is non - volatile solid)
state memory, providing maximum data security even If the battery
becomes discharged. The device can be started and stopped directly
From your computer and its small size allows it to fit almost anywhere.
The Pulsel 10 makes data retrieval quick and easy. Simply plug it into
an empty CUM port and our user - friendly software does the rest.
-0
<'Wr ■ + +A ...sc �. r.... r�ri
—Mx!
MadgeTech Data Recorder Software
displays pulse data in an easy to use graph.
■ The Windows' -based software package allows
the user to effortlessly collect, display and
analyze data. A variety of powerful tools allow
you to examine, export, and print professional
looking data with just a dick of the mouse.
r
•rumor resreut ,rrcaw
or
wla a■ �' �1fYprn -iiDS Nrkf+9i'
x Z a
Click MaSEg IP, SDfLn , for more information or to
download the software.
879 Maple Street • Contoocook, NH 03229 54_�
PC Box 50 • Warner, NH 03278 • Phone- (6a3) 456 -201 1 - Fax. (603) 456 -2012
aL
J
PULSE110 SPECIFICATIONS*
Input Connection- Removable screw terminal Memory: 16,383 readings; software configurable memory wrap
Maximum Pulse Rate: 100Hz (1D ms);
Up In 1000 Hz in some applications
Input Range:
0 to 30V
Input Low:
c0AV
Input High-
72.7V
Internal Weak Pull -Up:
.500NA
input Impedance:
>lkD
Recommended Duty Cycle
18V: r50%
for inputs greater than
24V; X25%
12VDC (over 1 min. interval):
30V: <10%
Minimum Pulse Width/
4 ms
Contact Closure Time:
Engineering Units:
User may define units up to 10 characters
in length. This value is stored within the
device.
Scale Factor: User may program any desired scaling
factor from ml .000E -31 to t9,999F -31
The scaling factor Is stored within the
device.
Offset Value: User may program any deslred offset value
from ±1.000E -31 to ±9.999E�31 The
scaling Factor is stored within the device.
Reading Rate: I reading every second to 1 every 12 hours
Start Modes: Software programmable immediate starl or delay
start up to six months in advance
Real Time Recording: May be used with PC to monitor and recora data in
real time.
Visual Indicator. LED flashes at selected reading rate.
Battery Type: 3.6V lithium battery, included; user replaceable
Battery Life: At 15 min. reading rate C1 25°C:
Up to 1 year (25 Hz input 10% duty cycle)
Up to 5 years (-: 1 Hz input, 1% duty cycle)
Up to 10 years (< 0.1 Hz input, 0.1% duty cycle)
Data Format:
Date and lime stamped pulse count
Time Accuracy:
tl minute /month (at 20 to 30 °C)
Computer Interface:
PC serial or USB (interface cable rewired);
Low Level Current
57,600 baud
Software:
Windows 95198jMEJNT�2Q00lXPlVi5ta based
Operating Environment:
software
Intrinsically Safe
A0 to +80 "C, 0 to 95%RH non - Condensing
Dimensions:
13" x 2.7" x 0.8" (44mm x 69mm x 21 mm)
Weight: 1.1 uc (30 g)
Approvals: CE
BATTERY WARNING. FIRE. EXPLOSION. AND SEVERE $URN HA!_ARC.
DO NOT 3ECHARGE, DISASSEMBLE. HFAT ABOVE 212°F.
SOFTWARE FEATURES INCINERATE OR EXPOSE CONTENTS TO WATER.
Multiple Graphs: 3imuhaneousiy analyze data trom
several units or deployments; easily
switch to a single data series
Graphical Cursor: One click displays readings by time,
value, parameter or sample number
Data Table: Instantly access tabular view for
detailed dates, times, values, and
annotations
Scaling Options: Autoscale function fits data to the
screen, or allows user to manually
enter their own values
Formatting Options: Change colors, fine styles, plotting
Optlons, show or hide Channels quickly
Statistics: Calculate averages, min, max, standard
deviation, and mean kinetic temperature
with the touch of a button
Export Data: Export data in a variety of common formats, or
switch to Excel" with a single click
Calibration: Automatically calculate and store Calibration
parameters
Logger Configuratlon: Easy set up and launch of data loggers with
immediate or delayed start, preferrea sample
rate, and device ID
Communications: Automatically sets up communications port, or
lets user select configuration
'SPECIFICATION $ ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
5PECiFIC WARRANTY AND REMEDY L IMIT ATION S AMPLY
ORDERING INFORMATION LL
CA 1-603-458r201 I OR GO TO W WW.MADGErECILCOIA FOR aFrAII. S
Model Dlescri to ion Price [L si
PUL5E110 Pulse Recorder with 10 year battery Life 5199.00
IFC110 Software, manual and RS232 interface cable 199.00
IFC200 Software, manual and U58 interface cattle $119.00
LTC -7PN Replacement battery for Pu Ise 110 510.00
For Quantity Discounts call 603. 456.2011 or email Safes @mad 9te01.COfr_
Ask ABOUT OUR OTHER
DATA
RECORDERS
Temperature
Pulse&ventlState
Humidity
Low Level Current
Pressure
Law Level Voltage
pH
Rr Transmitters
Level
Intrinsically Safe
Shock
5pectral Vibration
LCD Display
`M_ -EaEw
DOC-1 074 00% 00 RE'+ E 24D9,0i.01
879 Maple Street • ConLDocook, NH 03229
PO Box 50 - Warner, NH 03276 - Phone: (603) 456 -201 I • Fax: (603) 456 -2012
Page 1 of'2
Subj: Re -Store'N Station- Water data
Date: 4/1/2010 8:30:55 A. M. Eastern Daylight Time
From: Musxit@aol.com
To: strederick(a?albemarle,arg
BCC: m rouse67 nccwildblue com
Summer -
After reading through Greg K's memo I wanted to give you the analysis of the plumbing fixtures
based upon a PER DAY usage. With the focus clearly on the what does use water rather than the
underlying by -right use, this is important. Please see attached. The frequency of use for each fixture
is greater than actually occurs and based upon a 24 hr period to make it the worst case scenario. The
plumbing fixture data sheet for the urinal, toilet, and faucet is attached which give the now volume ie
gallons per flush. With water conservation fixtures which are becoming the norm, this business will
use much less water than WaWa. iust to make clear - This special use permit was requested only,
because the Coun re uired it and not because the business will use more than the allowable 400
gallons per day per acre. The water will be monitored to ccmiply with the health department se tic
permit which overrides and is more definitive than the language in the Coun!y ordinance. You should
already have the Pulse meter that is proposed to be installed to monitor the water use. Of course, if RS
is allowed to connect to public water a ACSA meter would be less hassle for everyone.
I also talked to Jay S. who advised what plumbing fixtures are code required for a certificate of
occupancy. He also advised that although AC does require the facilities to be included in the
construction of the building is all. Whether they remain available to the public or staff or unlocked is up
to the business owner for instance The restrooms are for the convenience of the patrons. Of course,
if they are not available (or not well maintained /not clean) the patrons will go elsewhere. The code
requirements for food preparation which is under the dept of Agriculture (not health dept in this case) it
does require a hand wash sink for instance. It is also up to the business how they prepare food and
wash dishes or use disposable containers making all this optional.
Please make sure to include in your staff report that the Preliminary Plan that was previously reviewed
(and all comments were addressed) was for a 6,000sf 1st flr and on the revised PP it was reduced to
4.750sf - this was after conversations with the Chief of Zoning because we understood that a significant
reduction would result in a determination that a Special Use Permit would not be required.
Subsequently, that was not the case but I just want everyone to acknowledge that the size reduction
was an effort to appease everyone including those persons that have spoken out against the very
existence of the use at this location.
There is a lot of other information floating around that is not correct. To list a Few -
1. Number of fuel pumps on the Site - there are 6 under the large canopy and 1 under the small
canopy. The 2nd island under the small canopy is for "off road" fuel which is for small contractors to fill
their tank up that sits in the bed of their pick up truck or for small farm owners to purchase fuel for their
Farm tractors. It is illegal to use this fuel in a street vehicle.
2. Number of nozzles on each pump - Each fuel pump has 2 nozzles - so it can serve a car on each
side of the island.
3. Availability of "unbranded" gas being new - Currently there are already 2 unbranded gas stations
along this section of RT250West - Gateway sells unbranded and SuperTest oust to the West) sells
unbranded so this is not a new product to the area.
4. That this is a Service Station - This is not a "service station" which under old water use tables shows
water usage as 10 gallons per vehicle. As you may be aware, there are service stations in large cities
but our area they are few and far between these days. The Exxon in Ivy on RT250 is a service station
(across from Toddsbury) but most have been converted to ccnveniencelretail with gas sales. There is
also the Exxon on Emmett Street in the City.
If you need clarification on any item or more description, please advise.
Your assistance is appreciated.
Friday. May 2 L 2010 AOL: Musxit
Jo Higgins
Project Development Limited LC
2564 Worrey Rd
Lyndhurst, Va 22952
434 - 326 - 0334
musxit@aol.com
Friday. May 21. 2010 AOL: Musxit
Yage ? 01, 21
a
0
N
W
IA
M
CC
4'
ul
Q
❑
Z
1--
fl
• =
m
E
uj
�'
K
+�
WA
L
a
N
N
ti
N
`^
❑
cr
a'
CwC
G
SiC
❑
'�
'�
Z
f �a
n
DO
O
Ln
La
Z
Z
rll
❑
0
Ln
�
N
1Q
�
CA
7i
a
�
W
1�
03
Z
F-
Q
O
o
0
O
rLO
a
n
n
0
H
W
m
b
o
o
LL,
a
-4
m
3
ac
❑
L'
2
cC
a
w
O
�
IZ
4
❑
Q
O
-a
=
m
O
4
��
J
a
V1
o
0
m
LA
�U
ui
1i
a
a
�
W
i1]
N
W
F•
CL
L6
CL
Q
r-�
L
W
U
x
❑
m
Y
'
>
�W�y
=
vl
;n
w
C
'y
M
Z
=
LL
V
W
Ql
W
L1
`1
04J
oc
D
Cr
❑
¢
❑
r»
a
3
n
'`
x
x
x
x
x
z
a
a
LLJ
X
4--
IV
>
ww
�,
F
1=
LL
x
cr
w
a
u�
E
�.
�`
Z
L
IJJ
a
4��
zLL���
❑
00
00
g�a
LY
to
La
M
d
CC
m
x
x
''
w
W
❑
3
a
m
W
N
W
W
=
n,
w
a
CL
E
Ljj
le
❑
w
Z
(�
2
_
KU
N
0
ry
m
N
�
:�
�
N
.�
r4
Q
Q
~
Q
❑
LU
Vi
N7
❑
LL
C7
0-
W
G)
W
E
C
Ql
r
W
LU
~
to
J
J
W�
OQ
dA
Q
to
Q
OQ
(
rL
N
L
7
m❑
❑
❑
Lrs
a
LLr
w
111
o
'n
Ln
Ln
L
�'
Z
a
4
=?
r,
o+
ry
cu
a
a
a
W
L
r
�'
cn
V
m
lu
a
z
a
°°
o
a
z"
r
r-r
N
O
in
E
❑
L
•❑
U
°
3
LU
X
z
CL
Ln
Z
[IO
2
W
W
7
-
C
ri
d-1
D
1
D.
t
C
t
r
L
❑
Q
Z
Z
N
g
fm�
II
Q
a
n�i
(N
N
N
Ln
Lw
Q
ml
r4
CL
E
E
E❑
a
W
a
�
Q
N
o
o
Q
0
r-4
W
w
�
v
In
E
a,
R•
Q
L,
❑
,
Ln
p
Z
N
.
�
m
V
V
G
C
W
LU
a
C
Z
ry
y
N
Y
y
W
Y
V
w
LLi
w
d
CL
j
W
Q'J
C
t
LA
rn
W
d
W
ao
Ln
C
1"
=
G
ry
=
a
v
�=
s
E
3
�,
�,
In
OG
LY
r
N
Z
E
L
O
C
vl
+'
w
r4
W
C
uJ
�'
r-1
O
d
r-I
LW
LU
❑.-,
a
On
LL
mz
z
tQ
0
o
aj
a
z
'o
_
+
,�
U
Q
C
.0
4-
CL
a
Q
3:
m
VI
. +
Y
3
CU
M
tC
C
0
2
t%7
a
KOHLER: K- 3519 -T. Highlineg Comfort HeightV elongated 1.4 gpf toilet with tank cov... Page 1 of 2
THE BOLD LOOK I Ole
. r
Highline� Comfort Height elongated 1.0 gpf
toilet with tank cover locks - K-351 9_T
Dimensions:
30 -1/8" x 21 -1/4" x 31 -1/4"
Highline Pressure Lite 1,0 gpf toilets are perfect for
those customers aggressively seeking the benefits of
water conservation, this new toilet qualifies for water
rebate programs and contributes to LEED credits. An
optimized 1,0- gallon flush setting reduces water
consumption by more than 30% over 1.6- gallon toilets,
offering a water savings of more than 5,000 gallons of
water per Collet, per year.
• 30 -1/8 "L x 21 -1/4 "W x 31 -1/4 "H
• Pressure Assist flushing system
• Two -piece toilet
• Elongated bowl
• Includes trip lever, less seat and supply
• Meets strict flushing performance guidelines
established by the EPA ( Environmental Protection
Agency) WaterSense program
• WaterSense labeled toilets use at least 20% less
water than standard 1.6- gallon toilets
• This product can help a building earn Water
Efficiency points in the LEER Green Building Rating
System' ". See speclfication sheet for water use
data.
Available Colors
Color Finish: White L -0j
Model Number: K- 3519 -T -0
List Price: $606.25
"All prices are Manufacturer's Suggested List Prices in 0.5, dullars. The price you pay at your {oral supply autiet may be different
than the Manufacturer's Suggested List Price. These prices supersede oreveous prices and are subject to change witnout nut+ce.
These prices do not Include shipping. Any sales tax applicatite will be added to the races.
http: / /,A-ww. us. kohler.com /on I inecatalog/print. j sp ?prod —iium= 3519 = l' 2/6/2010
0
4
0
White [ -0)
Almond ( -47)
5i5C41t ( 96)
Mexocan Sand
Sandpar (-
Slack Black [
$606.25
5/15,45
3775.45
( -331
G9)
7)
3775.45
$77545
5835.30
"All prices are Manufacturer's Suggested List Prices in 0.5, dullars. The price you pay at your {oral supply autiet may be different
than the Manufacturer's Suggested List Price. These prices supersede oreveous prices and are subject to change witnout nut+ce.
These prices do not Include shipping. Any sales tax applicatite will be added to the races.
http: / /,A-ww. us. kohler.com /on I inecatalog/print. j sp ?prod —iium= 3519 = l' 2/6/2010
Washbrook HoWise[ 140. 125 GPF Urinal System - Bathroom Products - Urinals by A [lie r... Page 1 af'2
AT3tME"S_"9&4 Product Information
SIY e r',.: r k b :ier
This page was printed from. hitp llwww_aire,icanstandard.cor
. '�Yu�
Washbrook FloWiseTM 0.125 GPF Urinal System
Estimated List Price: $873
• System includes:
0.125 GPF Urinal- Washout Action
• High efficiency (0.125gpf1,5 Lpf)
• Over 87% water savings when compared to 1.0 gpf
system
• Flushing rim
• Elongated 14" rim from finished wall
• Washout flush action
• Extended side for privacy
• 3r4" tap spud
• Outlet connection threaded 2" inside (NPTF)
• 2 wall hangers
• Strainer included
• Meets ANSI flush requirements at 0.125 gpf
0.125 GPF Selectronic Urinal Flush Valve
• High efficiency (0.125 gpf10,5Lpf)
• Operates on DC Power (battery included)
• 11 112" Rough -in
• Water pressure range 25 -125 psi
■ Recomended pressure range 35 -80 psi
• Self - cleaning piston - operation
■ Fully mechanical manual override
• Fail -safe- valve automatically closes on loss of
power
• Chrome - plated
COLORS:
0 White ,C20)
FIXTURES & COMPONENTS:
Main Fixtures
Mat
FEATURES:
ADA Compliant
Water Efficient
littp:%! w• ww. americanstatidard- us. calnfurinalslwashbrook- 1lowise•- 0.125- gpf - urinal- systemi 2/6/2010
W
KOHLER.,
FAUCETS
Features
• Brass construction
• Single -hole mounting
• Above- counter battery and valve for easy installation
and maintenance
• Vandal- resistant aerator
• 24" (fit cm) flexible supply hoses far easy installation
• 6 -31-C (17.1 cm) spout reach
• Stationary spout
• Available with or without mixer
• Includes Iwo AAA batteries
• Less drafty
• .5 gallons (1.9 Q per minute flow rate
Codes /Standards Applicable
Specified model meets or exceeds the tollowing at date of
manufacture;
• ADA
• ASME A 112.18.1 /CSA B125.1
• ICC/ANSI A 117.1
• Energy Policy Act of 1992
Specified Model
b. 5 - r
ELECTRONIC FAUCET
K -13466
ALSO K-13467
ADA
Colors/Finishes
• CP: Polished Chrome
• VS: Stainless Steel
Accessories
• CP: Polished Chrome
• V5: Stainless Steel
• NA: None applicable
• Other: Refer to Price Book for additional colorsifinishes
Model
Description
Colors/Finishes
K -13466
Electronic faucet with mixer
:-I CP
—1 VS
K-13467
ectronic faucet — without mixer
_1 CP
J VS
Optional Accessories
K- 7129 -A
Grid drain with overflow
❑ CP
J Other
K -7129
Grid drain without overflow
❑ CP 1
J Other
K-1 3478-B
4" (10.2 cm) escutcheon plate — square
J CP J V5
K- 13479 -B
8" (20.3 cm) escutcheon plate — square
7 CP I V5
K -13601
Thermostatic mixing valve
J NA
Product Specification
The electronic faucet shall be made of brass construction. Product shall have 0.5 gpm (1.91pm). Product shall feature a 6 -3/4"
(17.1 cm) spout reach, stationary spout, and 24" (61 cm) flexible supply hoses for easy installation. Product shall feature an
above- counter battery and valve for easy installation and maintenance. Product shall include two AAA batteries. Product shall
be for single -hole mounting. Product shall available with or without mixer. Product shall be less drain. Faucet shall be Kohler
Model K-
Page 1 of 2 tJSAlCanada: 1- 800- 4KOHLER
1102760 -4 -D (1 -80 -456 -4537)
www.kohler.com
HYI)RO- ENIVIRONMLNTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC
April 16, 2010
Marcia Joseph- CLA, AICP
Joseph Associates LLC
481 Clarks Tract
Keswick, Virginia 22947
RE: Hydrologic Evaluation of the Proposed Restore N' Station. TMP 5513-1,
Crozet, Virginia
Dear Ms. Joseph-
Hydro - Environmental Consultants, LLC, (HEC) -is pleased to present this
evaluation of potential hydrologic impacts associated with the subject project.
HEC understands that the site developer Jeffries II, LLC plans to construct a
convenience storelgas station on an approximately 4 -acre parcel (TMP 55B -1)
located at 6115 Rockfish Gap Turnpike in Albemarle County, Virginia.
This report is based on the information you provided, available public information
on the hydrologic, soil, and hydrogeologic conditions at and in the vicinity of the
project. and H EC's experience on similar projects-
Background Information
Jeffries II, LLC has submitted a site development plan to Albemarle County to
develop a convenience store/gas station the 4 -acre site. Water supply for the
project will be provided by a Class II B public water supply well to be installed
and permitted in accordance with the Virginia Department of Health (VDH)
Waterworks Regulations (12VAC5 -590). Sanitary wastewater will be managed
with an onsite sewage system that HEC understands will include two 1500 gallon
septic tanks connected in series, a 5,000 gallon equalization tank, and two
conventional drainfields. The onsite sanitary system was sized based on a flow
rate of 1.600 gallons per day (gpd).
Old Dominion Engineering completed a Tier III Groundwater Assessment and
Groundwater Management Plan dated October 3, 2008 in general accordance
with the Albemarle County Groundwater Ordinance. The Tier III report provides
a summary of available information on site soils, geology, hydrogeology, existing
groundwater use, and potential threats to groundwater quality. To HEC's
knowledge no field investigations, other than a site reconnaissance and soils
Investigation for the onsite sewage system have been performed. In this report
groundwater withdrawal was estimated to be 725 gallons per day (gpd) based on
water use at similar facilities, and groundwater recharge was estimated to be
2,115 gpd. The report concluded that "it is not anticipated that groundwater
withdrawal of this magnitude will impact existing wells on adjoining properties or
elsewhere in terms of groundwater supply ". The report's groundwater
IIYDRCI- UNV IRON tiil� -NTAL CONSULTANTS, I.I.['
P[) Anx 3ao5, {.I.Is -N A 1.1.1 ;N. t IRC;INI A 23058
PIMI E �K04j 296- Clfi3f 1 .1} {804] 290 -1373 • )tii[ ?131F.1?. (8604) 512-71- H
management plan stated "The proposed development will seek to minimize
degrading groundwater recharge by implementing runoff - neutral site design and
storm water management strategies that minimize offsite runoff.
Albemarle County determined that a Special Use Permit was required because
"there is a significant likelihood that the project's water consumption will not stay
below the 400 gallons per site acre per day consumption threshold" in the Zoning
Ordinance. In a January 20, 2010 addendum to the Tier III report, True North
Environmental revised the groundwater withdrawal estimate to 1,643 gpd or
approximately 400 gpd/acre. The addendum also stated that the original
estimate of groundwater recharge (2,115 gpd) was very conservative and that
recharge would exceed this estimate.
Surface water quantity will be managed in two Raintank systems. One Raintank
system in the northern portion of the site will collect water from roof drains. HEC
understands that water collected in this Raintank will be used to supplement
onsite irrigation of landscaped areas. The second Raintank system in the
southern part of the site will collect runoff from paved areas. This Raintank
system will discharge through a level spreader to a broad swale onto adjacent
land south of the subject project. HEC understands that the Albemarle County
storm water regulations do not consider infiltration as a rneans of storm water
management. Therefore, there is no infiltration from the Raintanks.
Hydrologic Evaluation
The proposed development will have an effect on the hydrologic valance for the
site. Pre - development the site hydrology was dominated by groundwater
recharge, and sheet flow runoff to the south. The True North recharge estimate
is reasonable for the existing site conditions (un- developed open field) but does
not accurately estimate post - development recharge. Post - development
impervious surfaces, the increase in slopes around the perimeter of the
impervious surfaces, and the site landscaping will negate approximately 75% of
the recharge. Therefore, post - development natural recharge will be reduced to
approximately 525 gpd. A portion of the lost recharge will be made up from
induced recharge from the drainfield. It is difficult to quantify the induced
recharge from the onsite sewage system as the net consumptive use of the
proposed development is difficult to quantify.
Water use at the facility was originally estimated to be approximately 725 gpd
based on data from similar facilities. This estimate was increased to 1 ,643 gpd in
the January 20, 2010 addendum. The facility will need to obtain a transient non -
community water system permit from the VDH in accordance with the Virginia
Department of Health Waterworks Regulations (12VAC5 -590). The required
capacity of the waterworks is detailed in 12VAC5 -590 -590. According to the
VDH regulations, service stations are required to have a capacity of 10 gallons
per vehicle served. Although the capacity of the waterworks includes a safety
factor and does not equate to anticipated use, it does provide an estimate of
maximum groundwater use.
According to Table 2 of the Tier III report there are 10 private wells within 2,500
feet of the proposed development. The total depths of the wells suggest that two
of these wells and possibly four additional wells are bored wells completed in the
residuum- saprolite above the crystalline bedrock. Bored wells typically have a
very limited saturated thickness (generally 15 feet or less) from which to draw
water and are completed at the water table. These features make bored wells
particularly susceptible to small changes in water table levels either caused by
natural climatic conditions or man -made changes. Figure 3 of the Tier III report
shows that two of these wells are within a few hundred feet of the proposed
development. Drawdown of the water table from the facility well may cause
water table drawdowns that extend beyond the property boundary and could
measurably affect water levels in the nearby bored wells. The potential effect of
shallow bored wells with limited water depths depends on the depth of the water
column in the well, the proximity to the development supply well, and the
hydraulic connection between the residuum and the deep bedrock aquifer. The
potential impact to any nearby private wells completed in the bedrock are likely
negligible due to the greater saturated thickness typically found in deeper, drilled
wells.
Water from the southern Raintank system that is discharged to the swale south
of the subject property through a level spreader will likely effect the hydrologic
conditions on the adjacent property and may adversely affect the usability of the
property. HEC is not aware of any drainage easement with the adjacent land
owner to the south.
Conclusions
The proposed development will alter the hydrologic balance for the site. The
development will decrease the net ground water infiltration at the site and
increase the ground water withdrawal in the area. Several of the nearby private
wells appear to be bored wells that are most susceptible to changes in the local
ground water conditions. Drawdown of the water table from the facility well may
cause water table drawdowns that extend beyond the property boundary and
could measurably affect water levels in the nearby bored wells. There is
insufficient information on the construction, yield, use, static water level and
saturated thickness at nearby private wells and the site specific hydrogeologic
conditions to accurately evaluate potential impacts to the private wells.
HEC appreciates the opportunity to present this evaluation. I trust this
information meets your needs. If you have any questions, please call me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
Hydro - Environmental Consultants, LLC
ZZ�
Douglas R. Fraser, PG
Virginia Professional Geologist #004707
JOSEPH ASSOCIATES L LC
• 481 Clarks Tract
X4 are i
phon;� 34-98, -419 AIL'P Keswick Virginia 22947
phanc �13�3 -984 -4 194 a �
cell 434 -996 -1572
fax 434 -984 -3698
VIA ELECTRONIC DFLIVERV
May 26, 2010
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
Summer Frederick, Senior Planner
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: Application Number: SP200900034
Owners: Jeffries II LLC
Project: RE-STORE'N STATION
Tax Map 05 5BO-00-00-00 100
Dear Ms_ Frederick:
Thank you again for meeting with me on May 6, 2010. As you know, we are working with
HE & J. Inc. (HE & J) and its principals Mr. and Mrs_ Chris Suh. This letter is written in
cooperation with Mr. and Mrs. Suh in response to the staff report dated April 20, 2010 ( "Staff
Report ") with respect to Jeffries I1 LLC's (the "Applicant ") application for a Special Use Permit for
the property and project described above. LIE & J, in addition to many other citizens and property
owners in the area that will be affected by the Applicant's request, oppose the grant of a Special Use
Permit for this project.
First, we note that there is significant community opposition to the Applicant's proposed use.
We would hope that the correspondence from members of the community, as well as this
correspondence, will be included with and attached to the new staff report to be issued on this
matter.
The Applicant has requested a special use permit under Albemarle County Code of 1938. as
now in effect (the "Code "), § 18.24.2.2 paragraph 13, which requires a special use permit for, -[ uJ ses
permitted by right, not served by public water, involving water consumption exceeding four hundred
(400) gallons per site acre per day."
Need for Additional Analysis. The grant of a special use permit is not limited to one
consideration. Several factors must be considered. The County's Land Use Handbook, as published
on the County's website, provides minimum considerations.
At a minimum, the standards applicable to special use permits should require
consideration of: (1) the impacts of the special use on the character of the district; (2)
the impacts of the special use on the welfare of the landowners and occupants of land
in the district, see. Bell v City Council of City of Charlottesville, 224 Va. 490 (1982):
and (3) consistency with the comprehensive plan. National Afemorial Parr Inc_ v.
Board oj-Zoning Appealc of Fairfax County, 232 Va. 89 (1986) (upholding denial of
special use permit to operate crematory based on the negative impact of the proposed
use on neighboring properties and inconsistency with comprehensive plan). Other
factors that may be considered include: (1) the character of the property; (2) the
general welfare of the public; and (3) the economic development of the community.
Bell, supra. Thm factors are also akin to those delineated in Virginia Code §§ 15.2-
2283 and 15.2 -2284. (Emphasis added.)
These considerations are also part of the zoning ordinance, 31.6.1, which provides as
follows:
Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a
lindiin by the board of supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment
to adjacent property, that the character of the district will not be changed thereby and
that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, with
the uses permitted by right in the district, with additional regulations provided in
section 5 [of the zoning ordinance], and with the public health, safety and general
welfare. (Emphasis added.)
Considering these factors, there are many reasons staff has to recommend denial of the
special use permit. first_ this site is located outside the growth area of the County's comprehensive
plan. Second, the scale of this development overwhelms the site in terms of water use, traffic and
nuisance factors. Third, there is clear evidence that the sewage discharge is not limited to "domestic
waste" and that the representations made to the health department regarding sewage treatment are at
best understated and misleading. Fourth, there is insufficient information to measure potential
consumption at this time due to the lack of a traffic study. Fifth, a study of existing automobile
service stations in the area indicates that the additional truck step proposed by the Applicant is not
needed and, without such need, there is no justification for diverting precious water to this project.
Based on the record before the staff at this time, there is no basis or evidence that supports the
required finding that issuance of the special use permit will not be of a substantial detriment to
adjacent property.
The Apri 120, 2410 Stall Report indicates that the County staff does not have the resources to
make a determination. We believe a failure by the staff to obtain and analyze the information
available to it will render any decision by the board of supervisors on the special use permit
vulnerable to being overturned by a court. See. e.g.. Nutter v. Board ofSupen,isors of Washington
County, 29 Va. Cir. 394 (1992). The Albemarle County Land Use Law Handbook construes the law
as rcqui ring governmental scrutiny as follows:
A use allowed by special use permit is permitted "only after being submitted to
governmental scrutiniy in each case, in order to insure compliance with standards
designed to protect neighboring properties and the public." Board ofSupervisnrc of
Fairfax C 'ounty v Southland Corp., 224 Va. 514 (1982). An application for a special
use permit must be examined by ublic officials, and be guided by standards set forth
in the zoning ordinance, to determine the impact the proposed use wit] have if carried
out on the property. Southland Corp., supra. (Emphasis added.)
Based on the Mutter decision, cited above, we believe that the County must obtain a traffic
safety study from the State Highway Department, speak with the State Water Control Board,
especially about the possibility of pollutants entering the groundwater and adjacent streams, speak
2
with the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries to determine whether there is potential harm to
game and fish, and consult with a groundwater expert hired by the County if one is not on staff.
We also believe the staff has an obligation to reconsider Applicant's water report. We have
provided to the staff a water report that questions the Findings of the Applicant's water report. A
copy of the report is attached for your convenience. For example, our report questions whether the
Applicant's report considers the impact of pavement on water recharge. The County's
comprehensive plan, under "Ground Water" states as follows:
Surface water and groundwater are interconnected systems. 'Che quality and quantity
of one is interdependent on the quality and quantity of the other. For instance,
groundwater recharges springs and streams. Ira envious surfaces reduce groundwater
recharge and increase the rate and volume of surface water dischar red during storms.
(Emphasis added.)
We also question why the Applicant's water report dues not adequately document the number of
wells in the area. It appears there are about ten wells excluded from the Applicant's report. The
impact of this increased water use applies to every well Currently used in the vicinity.
It is impossible to see how the planning commission or the Board of Supervisors can be
expected to make any decision on this special use permit without a thorough examination by County
staff and the prior resolution of issues that will affect water use. The Applicant Cannot demonstrate
that there will not be a substantial detriment to the adjacent property. Instead, it appears that the
grant of the special use permit to the Applicant will have a substantial detriment to the adjacent
property. If staff cannot perform a thorough analysis, then consideration of this permit should be
deferred until this analysis is conducted. The public reties on staff to use their knowledge and skills
to ensure that any legislation passed to protect the public good is adhered to by all applicants and is
not ignored.'
Legislative History. As you are aware, the granting of a special use permit is a legislative
act. The decision to grant or deny a special use permit is a legislative, not an administrative
function. See National Memorial Puck Inc. v. Board nf'Zoning Appeals of Pairfax County, 232 Va
89 (1986) and cases cited therein. A legislative body is not precluded from considering the history
behind the enactment of the statute. Such a body is not construing the meaning of the statute as a
court would be. in fact, the Code of Virginia requires that a board of zoning appeals consider the
purpose and intent of the statute. Va. Code Ann. § 15.2- 2309(1). Sinularly the Code requires that
the Board of Supervisors consider the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance when granting a
special use permit_ See Code §31.6.1.
We have examined the legislative history. It appears this requirement for a special permit for
water use was made at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors on June 7, 1989, In a prior meeting in
February 13, 1985 the staff explained to the Board of Supervisors that the 400 gallons per site acre
per day was "based on site acreage and corresponding [sic] to consumption rate of a single - family
dwelling." The staff stated that the minimum lot size for a dwelling not served by public water or
sewer was 60,000 square feet. This is about 1'1/3 acres. Relying on Health Department regulations,
T We note that an appeal is pending before the Board of Zoning Appeals to determine whether filling stations serving
semi - trucks is a permitted use under the ordinance and whether the Applicant's use wi11 generate industrial waste.
Resolution of these issues can affect the staff's recommendation.
3
the staff noted that a dwelling construes 150 gallons of water per day, per bedroom. In a four-
bedroom house, that would mean 600 gallons per day, which, per the staff report, is approximately
400 gallons of water per acre. Therefore, it is clear that water consumption was intended to be
based on a typical dwelling and that consumption not corresponding to a typical dwelling would
require approval.'
In this same meeting, the staff also stated that a "special use permit review would be required
for both groundwater and surface water withdrawal." This suggests that withdrawing groundwater
or surface water is counted toward the 400 gallon per day limitation. The Applicant believes that it
will not consume more than 1624 gallons of water per day. It is unclear whether the Applicant has
considered withdrawal of surface water in its determinations. An amount greater than 1624 gallons
per day requires a special use permit. We have previously provided to the staff information that we
have obtained and analyzed that indicates the Applicant will withdraw more than I624 gallons per
day.
Effect on Cum m unity. The zoning ordinance itsei f requires that the County's
comprehensive plan and the zoning ordinance be construed harmoniously. Code § 18.1.6 provides as
follows:
In drawing the zoning ordinance and districts with reasonable consideration of the
Comprehensive Plan, it is a stated and express purpose of this z..oning ordinance to
create land use regulations which shall encoura a the realization and implementation
of the Comprehensive Plan. To this end: development is to be encouraged in
Villages, Communities and the Urban Area. where services and utilities are available
and where such development will not conflict with the agricultural /forestal or other
rural objectives; and development is not to be encouraged in the Rural Areas which
are to be elevated to preservation of agricultural and forestal lands and activities,
water supply protection, and consenration of natural, scenic and historic resources
and where only limited delivery of public services is intended. (Emphasis added.)
The Crozet Master Plan provides as follows:
A strong Rural Areas policy should be put in place to assist in focusing growth within
the Development Areas and to help in mitigating cumulative impacts of additional
traffic on Routes 240 and 250. This policy will also be important to maintaining a
clear boundary between Development and Rural Areas. (p. 101.3} (Emphasis
added.)
Section 18.21.1 describes the intent behind the creation of commercial zones, including
Highway Commercial:
It is intended that commercial districts hereby and hereafter created shall be for the
purposes of providing places to conduct commerce and business as well as to provide
2 Technically it would equate to 435 gallons per acre, but the decision was made to round down to 400 gal ions per acre.
3 The staff did note as well that, based on statistics. this limitation would not likely affect industries that have a limited
number of employees and only consume water "for domestic purposes ".
4 Section 18.24.4 of the Code provides: "In addition to the requirements contained herein, the requirements of
section 21.0, commercial districts. generally, shall apply within all HC districts."
4
places of employment and strengthen the local economic base. To these ends,
activities involving retail, wholesale and service business shall be permitted at
appropriate locations within areas designated as the urban area, communities and
villages in the comprehensive Ian_ A review of transportation impacts shall be a
major consideration in the establishment and development of all commercial districts.
(Emphasis added.)
Code § 18.1.4 provides that one of the purpose of the zoning ordinance, "is that residential
areas be provided with healthy surroundings for family life." The residents of Crozet have
purchased their property with an intent to enjoy the rural nature of the area. The site at issue is not in
the development area under the County's comprehensive plan. Much of the land use surrounding the
site is Rural Areas, the least intense use defined in the zoning ordinance. The buildings in the
surrounding area that are also zoned HC are varied in size_ They range from commercial space that
measures 672 square feet to 7,040 square feet. The 7,040 square foot trucking enterprise is set back
from scenic 250, which greatly reduces its visual impact on the neighborhood. It is on public water
and limits its hours of operation to avoid creating a neighborhood nuisance_ Restore 'N Station will
ultimately measure over 11,000 square feet in size. In order to allow for the truck traffic, the site
plan illustrates nearly 112 an acre devoted to pavement to serve the diesel pump in the rear of the
site. This development proposed by the Applicant will significantly change the character of the area.
Applicant's intended water consumption %A also have a negative effect on the c:onimunity.
The Applicant's site is in the Blue Ridge Province, as shown on Map 2-4 of the Ground Water
section of the County's comprehensive plan. The Ground Water section in the County's
comprehensive plan states that in the Blue Ridge Province well yields are lower than more eastern
areas of AIbemarle County and that, in the Blue Ridge Province, "Potential for man -made
contamination is high, due to the shallow depth of the regolith."
Some of the adjacent wells are bored wells, which are more susceptible to changes in the
water table. The Ground Water section of the County's comprehensive plan states as fellows:
Bored wells (approximately 6% of individual supplies) usually penetrate to or just
below the bedrock/saprolite interface (most are 30 to 100 feet deep), and utilise water
from near - surface aquifers, often in the saprolite. Dug wells also utilize these near-
surface sources. For this reason, bored and dug wells are much more susceptible to
surface influence than drilled wells. Correspondingly, the likelihood of bacteria,
nitrate troleum or ether contamination is higher in bored and du wells. Yields in
these shallow wells are often higher than those for drilled wells. (Emphasis added.)
It is also possible that the Applicant's well could depressurize neighboring wells if the well is
drilled into the same or a connecting fracture used by a neighboring well. A depressurized well is
more likely to go dry. The Applicant should be required to pay for tests to the surrounding wells to
determine the likelihood that its consumption of water above the permitted amount would affect
these Surrounding wells.
Another issue of concern is the Applicant's intention to collect water and discharge it onto
neighboring properties without a drainage easement. Even with the level spreader, it is expected that
the neighboring properties will be seasonally saturated and ton wet to use. If the level spreader fails,
the discharged water could cause gullies to form on the adjacent properties. If the Applicant does
not have a drainage easement, its water use plan will need to be modified. This may affect water
5
consumption. We also ask if the stream to which this water will flow will have adequate capacity
according to Minimum Standard 19 of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. By
letter dated November 4, 2008, Amy PFlaum said "'r'he proposed level spreader may not satisfy the
requirements of VF,SCH MS — 19. The exit slope may not have a grade greater than I M/D. An
adequate channel and easement may be necessary through neighboring properties." Until these
issues are resolved, the granting of a special use permit is premature.
Under the comprehensive plan, the growth area boundaries are based on water drainage
areas. This site drains into the water supply, without first settling any contaminants in the
LickinghoIe Basin. In the past, land disturbance within this area has caused creeks and ponds to fill
with silt, which destroyed the life in the streams and ponds. Furthermore, the storm water outflow
will he released into streams and creeks. The comprehensive plan, section on Ground Water, states,
"Approximately half of the County's population uses surface water for consumptive uses through the
public system consisting of five reservoirs and one run -of -the -river intake." Contaminants can affect
the water of half of the County's residents.' These streams and creeks also support agricultural
enterprises. What happens if the value of the County's existing agribusinesses are hurt by this
development? We are all currently witnessing in the Gulf of Mexico an impact greater than any
anticipated consequences of a petroleum accident.
If the special use permit is granted, and the Applicant's water consumption exceeds the
amount permitted by the special use permit, we believe it will be very difficult for the County to
enforce. The Applicant's solution, if it does consume more than the permitted amount of water, is to
close restrooms or other fixtures not required by the Code. Does this mean that its employees and/or
customers will be running down Route 250 to another business or hiding behind the bushes to use
the restroom?
Traffic. Code § 18.21.2 states that a major consideration in zoning should be the
consideration of traffic issues. The traffic that would be created with this development, which is in
the rural area under the County's comprehensive plan, would create conflicts with school busses and
parents trying to take children to one of the three schools located just east of this site. Trucks will be
slowly entering the traffic flow on Route 250. The start up speed of the trucks and the increased
traffic created by this large -scale gas station convenience store will create even greater congestion
and vehicular conflicts on 250 W. Moreover, the amount of water usage will depend on the number
of patrons. Without a traffic study it is impossible to estimate the appropriate water usage in order to
determine whether a special use permit should be granted and under what conditions. See, id.
Drain Field. Finally, we are also concerned that no questions have been raised about the
Health Uepartmen& approval of a drain field that assumes the use of less water than the County has
already determined will be needed (and the reason why the special use permit is being required.) We,
question whether it is appropriate to cover the drain field with pavement. An improperly designed
drain field can cause problems, which will expose the ground and storm water to pollutants and
impurities. Many domestic wells in the vicinity could become unusable should contaminants be
added. At a minimum, the Applicant should be obligated to test samples of the existing water table
on site - as well as domestic wells within at least a two -mile radius of the property and should be
S We note that Applicant's proposed plan includes a storm water !filtering system. These systems, though helpful. do riot
remove all pollutants. They also seem designed for use in developed areas where the neighboring properties are on
public water, so any remaining pollutants are less of a concern to neighbors. In this case, not only can the neighbor's
wells be affected, but the Applicant itself may also be ofiected by pollutants. The Applicant's pwrons will be consuming
the water from the AppIicant's well.
M
held accountable for pollutant discharge into the water table and streams. Furthermore, the drain
field permit from the Health Department should have used a value of 10 gallons per day per vehicle
from Table 5.1 in the Health Department Regulations. The permit was based on much lower usage.
It is harmful to the community when a governmental unit defers to a governmental agency when the
agency has relied on facts and/or laws that are incorrect. A construction permit is null and void if
site and soil conditions are changed from those shown on the application. Moreover, the regulations
state that the drain field has to be 100 feet away from any cisterns (rain tanks?) which would affect
the northern drain field on the current site plan.
Conclusion. The Applicant states that it has provided data tliat indicates that "a store of this
size can operate well within the 1,624 gallons allowed by right ", However, this data is incomplete,
is inconsistent in its assumptions and shows that it is possible and likely that the Applicant will use
more than 1,624 gallons of water per day. The April 20. 2010 Staff Report does not examine,
supplement or analyze the Applicant's data. Moreover, the Applicant offers no assurance of its water
use other than a meter controlled by Applicant. This is not a by- right use and the proposed site plan
is out of scale for the site. For al I of the reasons discussed in this letter, we ask that the special use
permit be denied and that staff not recommend approval of the special use permit, especially in the
absence of any ftirther analysis by staff.
cc: Chris and Anne Suh
Amelia McCulley
Ron Higgins
Mike Marshall
Sincerely. 1
Albemarle County Planning Commission
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals
7
Resolution by the Crozet Communits, Advisory Council regarding the
Application for a Special Use Permit for the
proposed Re Store `N Station on Route 250 West
Before the Planning Commission on .Tune 8, 2010
In the matter before the Albemarle County Planning Commission on .tune 8.2010
regarding the application for a Special Use Permit for the proposed Restore 'N Station.
the CCAC hereby resolves that:
1.) The Planning Commission should require a traffic study prior to consideration of
a Special Use Permit regarding water usage. The Virginia Department of Health
(VDH) regulations require that a certain amount of water be available by
commercial establishments, on a per vehicle basis. As it is not known what the
daily vehicle traffic for the project will be. it is not possible to project the water
usage for the project. A Special Use Permit should not be considered until daily
traffic figures from VDOT have been received and those figures have been used
in the VDH calculations regarding water usage to see what the water demands of
the project will be: and
2] The County should require their own analysis of the water usage figures presented
by the applicant. This impartial analysis is critical, as a significant drawdown of
the water table in the area could have potentially devastating effects on the nearby
wells of the adjacent Freetown neighborhood, an historic community dating back
170 years. If the County staff is not able to perform an independent water usage
analysis, the applicant should be required to fund such analysis. This analysis
would be performed by impartial water expert.
Hereby resolved by unanimous vote of the CCAC:: May 20, 2010
RE -STORE STATION PROJECT RESOLUTIONS
WHEREAS, at a recent meeting of the Crozet Community Advisory Council (the "Council "),
Albemarle County Zoning personnel provided the Council with an overview of the proposed seven
thousand square foot Re -Store Gas Station and Convenience Store to be located on Route 254 West
near the Moose Lodge and Western High, Henley Middle and Brownsville Elementary Schools (the
"Project'); and
WHEREAS, the Project is located at the western entrance to Crozet; and
WHEREAS, numerous Crozet residents and severs I business owners attended the meeting; and
WHEREAS, members of the Council expressed numerous concerns relative to the Project as
currently proposed; and
WHEREAS, the residents addressed the Council and expressed their numerous concerns relative
to the Project; and
WHEREAS, the most significant concerns expressed at the meeting related to: (i) the projected
water usage and the water usage calculations which had been relied upon to approve the Project; {ii}
the current size, scope and scale of the Project to include its proposed six pump, seven thousand square
foot gas station, convenience store and office space facility which will rely solely on well water to
operate; (iii) the anticipated ground water runoff, much of which will necessarily carry pollutants down
into the adjacent neighborhood; (iv) increased traffic congestion adjacent to a congested, multi - school
zone; and (v) the future uses which may be made of the remaining acreage of the subject parcel; and
based thereon, it was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the Crozet Community Advisory Council respectfully requests the Albemarle
County Zoning Administration to revisit its calculations relating to the projected water usage of the
Project, which calculations appeared to be significantly understated as they were based upon dissimilar -
sized sites and sites where, in comparison to the Project's patrons likely coming from the Interstate and
needing in every instance to use the restroom facilities and to be hydrated, the water usage would be
significantly lower as compared to the Project; and it was
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Crozet Community Advisory Council respectfully requests that the
Albemarle County Zoning Administration, Albemarle Planning Commission, Albemarle County
Architectural Review Board and Albemarle County Board of Supervisors take all lawful measures and all
lawful means to materially reduce the size, scale and scope of the Project so as to materially reduce
associated water usage, water runoff and traffic congestion; and it was
FURTHER RESOLVE CI, that the Albemarle Planning Commission, Albemarle County Architectural
Review Board and Albemarle County Board of Supervisors take all lawful measures and all lawful means
to insure that the Project, as approved, complies with all zoning ordinances, rules and regulations,
including but not limited to light and noise pollution, and that it be built out in size and physically
oriented and otherwise designed so as to protect and preserve the integrity, to the extent possible, of
the adjacent neighborhood.
Crozet Community Advisory Council
By: Michael J. Marshall
Its: Chairman
Date: 25November 2008
The above Resolutions were adopted by the Crozet Community Advisory Council at its regular meeting
held on November 21, 2008.
Tina Ryner
2585 Brown's Gap Turnpike
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Summer Fredrick
Albemarle County Planning
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22901
RE: ReStoreNStation
PLEASE FORWARD THIS LETTER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS AND BOARD MEMBERS.
Dear Ms. Fredrick
I live on a small farm in western Albemarle /Crozet area. I am a retired firefighter, and use my
tractors and equipment to keep the place looking nice for myself and my horses, I love this area, and
like to spend my money close to home. l have seen the plans for the new convenience store to be built
on 250, just west of the high school. I look forward to having a place to buy gas close to home where I
can get my truck and horse tra lie r safely off the road. I often have to pass the current stations because
haphazard parking leaves the pumps inaccessible . I would also enjoy closer access to off road diesel for
my tractor, so l don't have to pay road tax on fuel being used in my fields. I do not use enough fuel to
justify installing my own larger tanks on the farm. Quite a few of my neighbors are in the same situation.
In the Crozet area, limited competition leads to higher fuel prices when compared to other locales. I look
forward to healthy competition. Capitalism is the American way.
I also noticed the plan has plenty of landscaping along 250, and that the access /egress is limiter!
which provides a more defined (and therefore safer) approach to the pumps. I do not understand why
the county seems to be making it so hard for a new business to open, especially when it conforms to
existing zoning. I do know that with more Choices in Crozet, I will not be driving back and forth to shop
or buy fuel in Charlottesville or Waynesboro as often.
In summary, I ask that you support this new business.
Thankyou!
Tina Ryner
Summer Frederick
From: VaDriving @aol.com
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2fl10 9:15 AM
To: Wayne Cilimberg; Planning Commission: WriteinSal@aol.com: email@scenicvirginia.org;
Ipowell @scenicvirginia.org. MLewisNut @aol.com, sarahchiffriller7ngmail.com
Cc: Summer Frederick Bill Fritz: Carla Harris
Subject: Re RESTDRE N' STATION SPECIAL EXCEPTION
THANKS WAYNE,
AS ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR LEGISLATION & REGULATIONS FOR 30+ YEARS, U.S. DOT /FHWA , AND
WORKING WITH THE US CONGRESS FOR 5 YEARS I BECAME INTERESTED IN THIS SPECIAL EXCEPTION
HAVING JUST MOVED TO CASTLEWOOD FARM. STOCKTON CREEK RUNS THROUGH OUR FRONT LAWN 8.
PASTURES AND THROUGH THE ENTIRE 440 ACRES OF THIS FARM. THUS HAVING HORSES NEAR THE CREEK
WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT WATER QUALITY IN THE AREA - AS WELL AS ANY CHANGE IN THE
CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD I HAVE CHOSEN TO MOVE TO. I WAS SHOCKED TO THINK
ALBEMARLE COUNTY WOULD CONSIDER A SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A TRUCK STOP ON THIS HISTORIC,
SCENIC BYWAY...AND FROM THE WATER QUALITY QUESTIONS AND TRAFFIC IMPACTS IT SEEMS TO BE A
MOST OBJECTIONABLE PROPOSAL. NOT TO MENTION THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ASPECTS OF
LOCATING SUCH A FACILITY NEXT TO AN HISTORIC AFRICAN - AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD WHOSE HISTORY I
HAVE LEARNED DATES BACK WELL BEFORE 1835 AND PRESUMABLY WAS A HOME FOR FREED VIRGINIA
SLAVES AND THEIR DESCENDENTS WHO STILL OWN THERE ? ??
ALSO, AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SCENIC VIRGINIA, INC., WHICH SUPPORTS SCENIC
BYWAYS AND WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN GETTING THE FOUR FEDERAL PARKWAYS IN VIRGINIA DESIGNATED
AS ALL AMERICAN PARKWAYS, WE HAVE SOME INTEREST IN THE SCENIC IMPACTS OF A TRUCK STOP ON
SCENIC ROUTE 250 - WHICH ATTRACTED ME AND CAUSED ME TO MOVE TO CROZETIGREENWOOD. I AM
PLEASED TO SERVE ON THE SCENIC VIRGINIA BOARD WITH FORMER ALBERMARLE SUPERVISOR, SALLY
THOMAS, AND I BELIEVE SHE TOO WILL HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION. I AM CC" ING
SALLY AND MEMBERS OF SCENIC VIRGINIA AS WE SURELY WILL HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE IMPACTS ON
RT 250, THE ENTRANCE WAY TO THE NATIONALLY KNOWN SKYLINE DRIVE AT 1 -64, EXIT 99, RT 250.
THANK YOU FOR KEEPING ME INFORMED ON THE HEARINGS, ETC.
FRANK CALHOUN
540 -456 -7030
Summer Frederick
From: Vadriving @aol.com
Sent: Monday. May 24. 2010 3:37 AM
To: Planning Commission
Subject: RESTORE N' STATION - RT 250,
ATT: PLANNING COMMISSION & STAFF;
AS A NEW RESIDENT OF GREENWOODICROZET, SOON TO BE DESIGNATED AS A VIRGINIA HISTORIC
DISTRICT. WHERE WE HAVE RELOCATED A 2ND HORSE BREEDING FARM FROM AUGUSTA COUNTY, 1 AM
APPALLED AT THE SIZE AND IMPACTS OF WHAT i UNDERSTAND WILL BE THE LARGEST AND ONLY DIESEL
TRUCK STOP IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY - THIS TOTALLY CHANES THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD
TO WHICH WE RELOCATED OUR BREEDING FARM. THIS IS A TOTAL CHANGE OF CHARACTER OF THE
RURAL AREA I HAVE INVESTED IN!
FURTHER, AS AN ATTORNEY WITH 38 YEARS PRACTICING ON CAPITOL HILL, THE CONGRESS AND THE
EXECUTIVE BRANCH, SPECIALIZING IN TRANSPORTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES - THIS SPECIAL
PERMIT "REEKS" OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ISSUE AS WELL A RACIAL INJUSTICE INASMUCH AS IT IS
RELOCATED NEXT TO AN HISTORIC BLACK COMMUNITY! FREE TOWN! IS ALBEMARLE COUNTY PREPARED
TO SEND A MESSAGE TO THE WORLD THAT THIS HISTORIC, SCENIC AREA A FEW MILES FROM FOUR FOUR
ALL - AMERICAN. FEDERAL SCENIC PARKWAYS READY TO EXPLAIN TO THOSE FUTURE RESIDENTS AND
BUSINESSES THAT THIS IS "NOT" THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY PEOPLE SEEK TO RELOCATE TO?
I CAN ASSURE THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT 1 AND MY FARM WILL FIGHT THIS IN THE COURTS- THERE
ARE MANY PRO BONO LEGAL GROUPS ACROSS THE U.S. THAT WILL BRING ALL THE LEGAL RESOURCES
THAT WE CAN MUSTER FROM ACROSS THE U.S. TO APPEAL ANY ADVERSE DECISION. AS ONE OF THE
ATTORNEYS WHO DRAFTED THE FEDERAL SCENIC BYWAYS PROGRAM LAWS AND WHO WORKED ON THE
LADY BIRD JOHNSON HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION ACT, A BOARD MEMBER OF THE PROMINENT SCENIC
VIRGINIA, INC., NON- PROFIT, FOUNDED WITH SEED MONEY FROM THE GARDEN CLUBS OF VIRGINIA - YOU
ARE SOLICITING LITIGATION THAT ALBERMARLE COUNTY DOES NOT NEED, AT SCENIC VIRGINIA'S BOARD
MEETING LAST WEEK AN UNAMIMOUS RESOLUTION WAS PASSED BY THEIR BOARD TO ADOPT AND VOTE
ON AN EMERGENCY RESOLUTION SPECIFICALLY OPPOSING ANY SPECIAL PERMITS ON SCENIC BYWAY
250. AS AN AFFILIATE OF SCENIC AMERICA, YOU WILL SEE MUCH ADVERSE PUBLICITY IN THEIR NATIONAL
ALERTS - THAT SCENIC BYWAY ROUTE 250 IS ENDANGERED! IS THIS HOW THE PLANNING COMMISSION
AND SUPERVISORS WANT TO ATTRACT DESIRABLE DEVELOPMENT TO HISTORIC ALBEMARLE COUNTY?
ALBEMARLE COUNTY WILL BE MARKED AS A COUNTY IN ONE OF THE MOST SCENIC, SENSITIVE TOURIST
AREAS IN THE U.S. AS "ENDANGERED!"
I SUGGEST THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF CONSULT THE VIRGINIA HISTORIC REGISTER AND THE
NATIONAL HISTORIC REGISTER AND MEASURE THE DISTANCE OF THESE GRAND HISTORIC FARMS AND
THEIR DISTANCE FROM THE "GRAND" ALBEMARLE DIESEL TRUCK STOP!
I WOULD APPRECIATE STAFF FORWARDING MY EMAIL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND A CC: TO ME
SO THAT OUR ATTORNEYS WILL KNOW THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ARE ALERTED TO THE FACT
THAT VA. AND NATIONAL GROUPS ARE AWARE OF ENVIRONMENTAL, SCENIC AND RACIAL ISSUES
INVOLVED, YES! VIRGINIA WILL GET ATTENTION AND POTENTIAL CORPORATIONS, HORSE OWNERS AND
OTHERS WILL KNOW THAT THEY BEST THINK TWICE BEFORE RELOCATING TO ALBEMARLE, AS I HAVE AT
GREAT EXPENSE. I WOULD APPRECIATE CALLS FROM ANY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS AND
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SUPERVISORS TO DISCUSS THIS SPECIAL EXCEPTION - LEGAL RESOURCES ARE ON
CALL. I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN ON -SITE MEETING WITH AS MANY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS AND
SUPERVISORS WHO THINK THAT THIS SHOULD BE AN IMPORTANT CONCERN TO THEM IN THEIR DECISION
MAKING PROCESS. 1 WILL RELEASE TO THE PRESS THOSE THAT DO NOT RESPOND.
FRANK L. CALHOUN
ATTORNEY.. RETIRED
BATTERSEA STUD FARM
CROZET, VA. 540A56 -7030
Summer Frederick
From: Wayne Cilimberg
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10 :39 AM
To: Summer Frederick; Bill Fritz
Subject: FW: proposed Re- Store' N Station Special Use Permit
From: Vasiukevicius, Ruta (rov7e) [ mailto :rov7e @eservices.virginla.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 1:14 PM
To: Planning Commission
Subject: proposed Re- Store' N Station Special Use Permit
Planning Commission Members,
I would like to add my voice to those who are concerned about the pollution and waste discharge, additional
traffic in a school zone and quantity of proposed water use associated with the proposed project. I strongly
oppose the proposed Re- Store' N Station on the grounds that it is inappropriate for this location in its size,
scale, and proximity to the area schools. I object to the increase in water use from the local aquifer that most
of the area homes rely upon. The noise, air and water pollution will adversely affect the nearby neighborhood
as well as the schools. I am asking you to vote no on the Zoning appeal for this project. i will try to keep up
with the progress of this special use permit on June 1" and June 8`h.
Thank you for your time and attention.
Ruta Vasiukevicius
Crozet area resident
Summer Frederick
From: Wayne Cilimberg
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 10:23 AM
To: Summer Frederick, Bill Fritz
Subject: FW: "Re- store'N Station Project
From: esngalloway @gmail.com [mailto:esngalloway@gmail.com] an Behalf Of Eric Nagy
Seat: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 10:15 AM
To: Planning Commission
Subject: "Re- store'N Station Project
20 April 2010
Dear Planning Commission.
I am very concerned about, and strongly object to, the planned "Re- store'N Station Project." The scenic and
communitty based location, direely adjacent to three schools is a very poor choice for such and sigmificant
project. It will hugely impoact the tone and communitee value of the area in a negetaive way. Apporval of this
project is short sighted and consideres only a narrow= economic sector. Please do not continiue with this project.
Sincerely,
Eric Nagy
232' ) Whippoorwill Road
Albemarle County
2323 Whippoorwill Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901 -8804
tel: 434-977-3121
cel: 434 - 906 -3122
skype: flightofthesandor
Summer Frederick
From: Wayne Cilimberg
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 4:59 PM
To: Summer Frederick: Bill Fritz
Subject: FW Re -Stare and Station, a quality of fife disaster for our community
From: Margaret Haupt imaiito:rnargaret.hauptL gmail.r-omj
Sent: Monday, April 1.9, 2010 9:37 AM
To: Planning Commission
Subject: Re-Store and Station, a quality of life disaster for our community
Dear Planning Commission,
I have been a resident of the Batesville /Greenwood community since 1976
and I am very concerned about the size and scale of the proposed Re -Store
and Station Project. I had planned to attend the meeting tomorrow night ,
but understand that it will not be on the agenda. .
I will certainly be following the project as it goes through the appeals
process with the Board of Zoning. Route 250 is a scenic and historic road
and an interstate truck stop is not in keeping with the beauty of this area.
In addition there are many other considerations such as the impact on
traffic, the impact on the historic black neighborhood as well as the
concerns about water quality.
Thank you for the hard work you do on the behalf of all of us.
Sincerely yours,
Margaret Haupt
7181 Batesville Road
Afton, Virginia 22920
540 4566596
F
Summer Frederick
From: Wayne Cilimberg
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:24 PM
To: Summer Frederick; Bill Fritz
Subject: FW: Say NO to gas station on Rte250
FYI
From; Diana Boven [mailto:dianaboven @gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:15 PM
To: Planning Commission
Subject: Say NO to gas station on Rte250
Dear Albemarle Planning Commission.
1 understand the store and gas station on Rte250 in Crozet won't be on the agenda on April 20th, but IT be
following the project as it goes through the appeal process with the Board of Zoning Appeals.
1 am concerned about having an interstate truck stop on Scenic Route 250. This project is proposed to be sited
right next to three schools and preliminary uuffic data indicate that traffic "rill be increased at least 25% along
that stretch of Route 250.
There are several factors that will negatively impact the quality of life in the region:
-increased traffic
*water usage
-waste discharge
-scale of the project on that stretch of road, compared to existing businesses
-increased noise
-potential runoff from gas and oil leakage from cars
-light pollution (esp. if this is a Sheetx which is notorious for excessive lighting)
-the devastating impact on the historic neighborhood directly behind the project, including
the impact on their existing wells and their quality of life (particularly if this project is a 24 hour business)
I ask the Albemarle Planning Commission to deny the special use permit.
Concerned Citizen,
Diana Boven
iprli 1.+, 2111 'p
If. %1 14 :tIkc T - .11
4W llezt Lum:
l rs,4. VA 22074
I( $' Albetuarit C „tint li(1ard of Super,. i. -iorti =d ]'Innnt»y is otwiwsion
Fil%CCI tLk Nt+msrrcr 1� rederick. C'ontniuriii k i )%:L ciopnic n hat cF7 2 - 4 12 6
It : S1' 21]W 14 CoNVI- till..N (-'l S Brit I- - R(WKF[SII i,,1V 1I ItNIIII:I CAT.i.F•1] R V,
SiC1w:ti sl iII(I\
I am a retiident o AIbeniarlc Ct) urtl: anJ limA: oNj ncrsitip int,:re.s: in s.-vcral :llhemurle
Count% businv,, -%rs including, onv In C roiet. With tlx: arnrnmt nt mxe, I pn■. it i% imubling to me
brat tettc: lie rti are iteinl; laid „I w --nilr exirunL 70MIJI cnrnnZeresa: orttnen} I% no: Heine de4ulnlxd
Ibis n ne ail dcvelopnieuI «iI st4neratu incnrtte to The { ukMIN It hell, 1uUPporl the SC 11001 btA1get
and uacher calarics
I ita% c hertz rhr,,u h the deuelupnlCne prurt ss sevcrttl tintr:,. It is dil3rscult and C\perisive
it tfcsclr p propert y in AIbeinarle Lmuit7. Fhe County shouicl support hussncsio and the
CounLN taff%houId U -NSiSI 1310SC lrtitlg tr, .leeelLIP land. C�TWCiiilly : +n ]AMI tlt:tt ltns tscen r Est IeLl I „r
de%eiupmenI. I urtlrer discu- „-swn should K savcd fair rr- 7untn� 01.1d 1)1 all[ tin_L tsaueS.
I I : retIem"i kite lt4- SI,sre'\ titaliun yitc plan and the 14 cat itsTi. T1ic-rc i, nothing
"hist ;,rig•” nt ruriI ahout th;tt stti ,,CRF 2'0 r 11h WFtcn '1414; 10o Hr K3ad is Iocared in the
.i4init, alreach The land i:: coned commercial alid s hit uIJ br ahlowed In he dts -c laped to 11T as
MIIji ci,mme%ial de►clupmrm nn the prupc•rt,, at, possihIv. I hcl levc A1$cniarle C otint, should
'Support and ti�sist Re- Str,re'N nation a 4th t3,rir de,.c•Inpnient pi an. 'thank you all Iur yk)urhard
ctiork and -en,icc irs the Count• .
S t 174: CI C11 .
l-1AA. Waller. Jr.
Stecilien 6 Sue Plaskon
Orr-hard Hill Farm /Estate
RI vk37 at RM25C west
ivy VA 22945
Summer Fredrick
Albematte County Pranning
40. McIntire Rd-
Charlottesville. VA 239[11
RE- ReStoreNStation
Dear Ms. Fredrick
My wife and I have had a property in Ivy on Rt #M West for 25 years and I would like to write in
support of the proposed ReStoreNStation project. There are several tsasit points I would like to make:
91 - I have Quite a bit of equipment that I use on my urooerty and I would like to mention That
having additional conveniences and access to luel in our immediate area would he most beneficial.
43 having Irveo on At 41250 west in tvv For a number of years, i have never been concerned or
bctnered by street noise or the activity at anv of me businesses nr ivy Center wnrClt 6 quite near my
p-operiv.
p3- 1 have seen the site plan for the project and I have noted that it is well landsca Dee, along 2so
and is extremely wetl designed with proper access Please Forisider Iusr how impurtant this is To note
given the amazingly unregulated and uncnntral}ed situatior- you currently have within Ivy Center -
Question, Have you ever seen the cltaouc traffic movement at the Ivy Comer (Nursery. the u.5, Post
Office, the Tod dsberry Convenience Store, and Ivy Depot Roap a its intersechor with Rt 4250W?
C lea rry we need better designed and safer conveniences along Rta250 West to alleviate some or the
pressure on these g ra ndf at here d slIuaiicns that app are nuy tan not be Changed or regwated. A newiv
cesrgned and improved type of fuel and convenience store would perhaps even serve as a model wfmn
future renovations and changes are planned for the er.�sting businesses.
Thank you for allowing me an apponunity to support this project and l Mope you will find my
comments and observations tielntul as you consideT the approval or this project.
Sincerely,
STC4nen P. Plasxon
Summer Frederick
From: Wayne Cilimherg
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 40:09 AM
To: Summer Frederick; Bill Fritz
Subject: FW: Proposed Truck Stop near WARS
From: Heather Marcel [mailto:haminga @yahoo,corn]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 5:03 PM
To: Planning Commission
Cc: Ann Mallek
Subject: Proposed Truck Stop near WAHS
I am writing to urge you to deny the application for special use pc=-t for the proposed truck step near Western
High, Henlev Middle and Brownsville Hlementar - SchooLs. 'Phis is already a congested area where mania, many kids
WALK to the different schools. Will we want our kids walking to school with (a) mantis trucks and (6) unknown
truck drivers NVith unknown backgrounds RIGHT by the schools? 'This seems fosolish to me that you would even
consider this.
As I understand it, it is going to be the 2nd biggest truck stop in the County. Put that next to the 2nd biggest
elementary school in the County - l ask you - does that make sense? We don't let child predators live within a
certain mile radius to a school - why would we put random transient strangers right next door?
Thank you for your consideration.
Heather Nfarcel
,Mom of two, ages 4 and G
1 062 Old Fax Trail Lane
Crozet, VA 22932
Summer Frederick
From: Wayne Cilimberg
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 10:10 AM
To: Summer Frederick; Bili Fritz
Subject: FW: Proposed truck stop off Crozet exit of 64
From: Theresa Ortega [ma[Ito:taortega @comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 5;05 PM
To: Planning Commission
Subject: Proposed truck stop off Crozet exit of 64
As a parent of a Brownsville Elementary School student, I urge you not to approve the special use application for
the proposed truck stop (Restore'N Station) near WAHS, Henley and Brownsville. We do not need this type of
increase in traffic so near out schools and on our already congested road ways.
Thank you,
Theresa Ortega
Summer Frederick
From: Wayne Ciiimberg
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 10:10 AM
To: Summer Frederick; Bill Fritz
Subject: FW: Do not approve Crozet truck stop proposal
From: denise.pinto[a Iive.com [mailto:denise.pinto @ live.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 3:37 PM
To: Planning Commission
Cc: Ann Mallek, Ron Higgins
Subject: Do not approve Crozet truck stop proposal
Please do not approve the use application for the proposed truck stop (Restore 'N Station) near
WAHS, Henley and Brownsville. There is no need to have a truck stop so close to the schooLS causing
increased congresIIOri & powntial safer' issues for our children.
Denise Pinto
Summer Frederick
From: Wayne Cilimberg
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 10:10 AM
To: Summer Frederick. Bill Fritz
Subject: FW truck stop
From: The Grinnells [ mailto:forbean2 @embargmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 9:31 PM
To: Planning Commission
Cc: amellack@albemarle.org
Subject: truck stop
As a concerned citizen of Crozet, I do not agree with the proposal of a new gas station in Crozet, we have enough! I hope
that you vote against this proposal! Thanks, Betsy Grinnell
Summer Frederick
From: Joanne Meier Urneier @ericmeier. net]
Sent: Monday. May 24. 201 a 6:20 AM
To: Planning Commission
Cc: Ann Mallek' Ran Higgins
Subject: Proposed truck stop near our schools - No!
Hello,
Please Q❑ NOT approve the special use application for the proposed truck stop near the Western feeder
pattern schools.
250 is already busy enough, we do not need more vehicles, especially tractor trailers competing for road
space. The trucks are noisy and create more pollution. I'm also concerned about what this proposed truck stop
will do for our property values in Crozet. Perhaps my main concern is the amount of transient traffic coming
through our wonderful, small town, especially so close to our schools.
This is NOT the type of business development we want here in Crozet. Please vote NO to the special use
application before you.
Sincerely and respectfully,
Joanne Meier
Crozet resident,
President, Brownsville PTO