HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201100021 Staff Report Special Use Permit 2011-11-29�L
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING
STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
Project Name: SP 201100021 Herring - Verizon
Staff: Scott Clark, Senior Planner
Wireless Tier III PWSF
Planning Commission Public Hearing:
Board of Supervisors Hearing: TBD
December 6, 2011
Owners: James M. Herring, Jr., or Julie Ann Herring
Applicant: Stephen Waller- GDN Sites;
Verizon Wireless C/O Maynard Sipe, LeClair
Ryan
Acreage: 83.42 acres
Rezone from: Not applicable
(Lease Area: 1,200 square feet)
Special Use Permit for: 10.2.2(48) Special Use
Permit, which allows for Tier III personal wireless
facilities in the RA Zoning District.
TMP: Tax Map 53 Parcel 6
By -right use: RA, Rural Areas; EC, Entrance
Location: 8268 Newtown Heights
Corridor
Magisterial District: White Hall
Proffers /Conditions: Yes
Requested # of Dwelling Units/Lots: N/A
DA - RA - X
Proposal: Special use permit amendment to
Comp. Plan Designation: Rural Areas in Rural
allow replacement of existing 53.5 -foot treetop
Area 4 - Preserve and protect agricultural, forestal,
monopole with a 97 -foot treetop monopole, with
open space, and natural, historic and scenic
associated ground equipment. .
resources/ density (.5 unit /acre in development lots)
Character of Property: Mostly wooded and currently
Use of Surrounding Properties: Rural Areas —
contains four existing monopoles and associated
large forest parcels and small single family
ground equipment.
residential lots
Factors Favorable:
Factors Unfavorable:
1. The replacement is proposed within an
1. None identified.
existing facility and will not have any visual impact to
the entrance corridor or adjacent properties.
2. The Architectural Review Board staff has
recommended approval based on minimal visibility
from I -64, an Entrance Corridor.
Zoning Ordinance Waivers and Recommendations:
Based on findings presented in the staff report, staff recommends approval of SP201100021 (with a
condition) and associated modification requests (for Sections 5.1.40(c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(9).
STAFF CONTACT:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
AGENDA TITLE:
PROPERTY OWNER:
APPLICANT:
Scott Clark, Senior Planner
December 6, 2011
NI VIE
SP201100021:Herring - Verizon Wireless Tier III PWSF
James M. Herring, Jr., or Julie Ann Herring
Verizon Wireless
PROPOSAL:
This is a proposal to amend an existing special use permit to allow replacement of existing 53.5 -
foot treetop monopole with a 97 -foot treetop monopole, with associated ground equipment. This
use requires a special use permit because there are already four personal wireless service
facilities on the site. The new proposed monopole would be at the same height as the reference
tree, which is located on a steep slope behind the site.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan designates the property as RA, Rural Areas- agricultural, forestal, and
fishery uses; residential density (0.5 unit /acre in development lots).
CHARACTER OF THE AREA:
The site contains an existing personal wireless service facility and associated ground equipment.
The property is mainly wooded, and the character of the surrounding areas is a combination of
large forest parcels and small single family residential lots. This site is along I -64, directly north
of the VDOT Workers' Memorial overlook.
PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY:
The following applications, all for personal wireless services facilities, have been approved for
this site:
Special Use Permits
• SP 1999 -00010
— Personal Wireless Service Facility
• SP 2000 -00030
— Personal Wireless Service Facility
• SP 2000 -00041
— Personal Wireless Service Facility
• SP 2003 -00012
— Personal Wireless Service Facility
• SP 2003 -00054
— Personal Wireless Service Facility
• SP 2007 -00065
— Personal Wireless Service Facility (Herring Property — Verizon)
Site Development Plans
o SDP 2007 -00101 —Wireless facility site plan
DISCUSSION:
A Special Use Permit is required for this proposal because the site has more than three personal
PA
wireless service facilities within 200 feet (subsection 3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance). Four
wireless facilities are currently located on the site. This proposed facility would replace one of
them.
ANALYSIS OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST:
Section 31.6.1 of the Zoning Ordinance below requires that special use permits be reviewed as
follows:
Will the use be of substantial detriment to adjacent property?
It is staff's opinion that the proposal will not be of substantial detriment to the adjacent
property. The facility is located in a densely wooded area on a steep hillside that prevents any
of the poles on the site from being skylighted. The replacement facility would have no greater
impact on adjacent properties than the existing facilities.
Will the character of the zoning district change with this use?
This proposal is for the replacement of an existing facility, not the introduction of a new use.
Thereore it is staff's opinion that the character of the zoning district will not change with this
use.
Will the use be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance?
Staff has reviewed this request as it relates to the "purpose and intent" that is set forth in
Sections 1.4.4 and 1.4.7 of the Zoning Ordinance, and as it relates to the intent specified in the
Rural Areas chapter of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 10.1). This request is consistent with
both sections.
Will the use be in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district?
As noted above, this proposal is for the replacement of an existing use. No significant adverse
impacts on adjacent properties in the (RA) Rural Area district are anticipated. The proposed
personal wireless service facility will not restrict any nearby by -right uses within the Rural
Areas district.
Will the public health, safety and general welfare of the community be protected if the
use is approved?
The public health, safety, and general welfare of the community is protected through the
special use permit process, which assures that uses approved by special use permit are
appropriate in the location requested. The proposal is for a replacement of an existing,
approved monopole. No change to the public health, safety and general welfare is expected
with the approval of the replacement.
Compliance with Section 5.1.40 of the Zoning Ordinance
The county's specific design criteria for Tier III facilities as set forth in section 5.1.40 (e)
are addressed as follows.
Section 5.1.40 (e) Tier III facilities. Each Tier III facility may be established upon approval of
a special use permit issued pursuant to section 31.6.1 of this chapter, initiated upon an
application satisfying the requirements of subsection 5.1.40(a) and section 31.6.2, and it shall
be installed and operated in compliance with all applicable provisions of this chapter and the
following:
1. The facility shall comply with subsection 5.1.40(b) subsection 5.1.40(c)(2) through (9) and
subsection 5.1.40 (d)(2),(3),(6) and (7), unless modified by the board of supervisors during
special use permit review.
2. The facility shall comply with all conditions of approval of the special use permit.
Requirements of subsection 5.1.40(a) application for approval and section 31.6.1 special use
permits have been met. Compliance with Section 5.1.40(e) of the Zoning Ordinance: The
County's specific design criteria for Tier III facilities set forth in Section 5.1.40(e)(1) and
5.1.40(e)(2) are addressed as follows: [Ordinance sections are in italics]
Subsection 5.1.40(h (1 -51 Exemption from regulations otherwise applicable: Except as
otherwise exempted in this paragraph, each facility shall be subject to all applicable regulations
in this chapter.
The proposed wireless facility will meet the required Rural Areas setbacks in addition to all other
area and bulk regulations and minimum yard requirements. Attached site drawings, antennae and
equipment specifications have been provided to demonstrate that personal wireless service
facilities (PWSF) regulations and any relevant site plan requirements set forth in Section 32 of
the zoning ordinance have been addressed.
Subsection 5.1.40(c)(2): The facility shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows:
(i) guy wires shall not be permitted; (ii) outdoor lighting for the facility shall be permitted only
during maintenance periods; regardless of the lumens emitted, each outdoor luminaire shall be
fully shielded as required by section 4.17 of this chapter; (iii) any equipment cabinet not located
within the existing structure shall be screened from all lot lines either by terrain, existing
structures, existing vegetation, or by added vegetation approved by the county's landscape
planner; (iv) a whip antenna less than six (6) inches in diameter may exceed the height of the
existing structure; (v) a grounding rod, whose height shall not exceed two (2) feet and whose
width shall not exceed one (1) inch in diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be
installed at the top of facility or the structure; and (vi) within one month after the completion of
the installation of the facility, the applicant shall provide a statement to the agent certifying that
the height of all components of the facility complies with this regulation.
The replacement will not require guy wires or whip antenna. The proposed grounding rod meets
the requirements of the ordinance, and the facility will only have one outdoor light fixture that
will only be in use when service is being performed at the site at night or during weather events.
The ground equipment will be located next to the existing ground equipment which is sheltered
from all lot lines by existing vegetation. The applicant will be required to provide a statement
certifying that the height of the new extension complies with this regulation.
Subsection 5.1.40(0(3): Equipment shall be attached to the exterior of a structure only as
follows: (i) the total number of arrays of antennas attached to the existing structure shall not
2
exceed three (3), and each antenna proposed to be attached under the pending application shall
not exceed the size shown on the application, which size shall not exceed one thousand one
hundred fifty two (1152) square inches; (ii) no antenna shall project from the structure beyond
the minimum required by the mounting equipment, and in no case shall any point on the face of
an antenna project more than twelve (12) inches from the existing structure; and (iii) each
antenna and associated equipment shall be a color that matches the existing structure. For
purposes of this section, all types of antennas and dishes regardless of their use shall be counted
toward the limit of three arrays.
The proposed antennae configuration will consist of two sectors with three panel antennas that
measure 94.6 "x 11.2 "x 4.5 ", and each antenna shall not exceed 1,152 square inches. Mounting
collars will keep the outer edge of the antennae within 12 inches of the pole. All antennae will be
painted to match the color of the monopole.
Subsection 5.1.40(c)(4): Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a tree
conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist. The plan shall be submitted to the agent for
review and approval to assure that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The plan
shall specify tree protection methods and procedures, and identify all existing trees to be
removed on the parcel for the installation, operation and maintenance of the facility. Except for
the tree removal expressly authorized by the agent, the applicant shall not remove existing trees
within the lease area or within one hundred (100) feet in all directions surrounding the lease
area of any part of the facility. In addition, the agent may identify additional trees or lands up to
two hundred (200) feet from the lease area to be included in the plan.
The installation of the proposed extension and all supporting ground equipment will be kept
within the existing facility compound. No trees will need to be removed in order to install the
new antennae and ground equipment.
Subsection 5.1.40(c)(5)The installation, operation and maintenance of the facility shall be
conducted in accordance with the tree conservation plan. Dead and dying trees identified by the
arborist's report may be removed if so noted on the tree conservation plan. If tree removal is
later requested that was not approved by the agent when the tree conservation plan was
approved, the applicant shall submit an amended plan. The agent may approve the amended
plan if the proposed tree removal will not adversely affect the visibility of the facility from any
location off of the parcel. The agent may impose reasonable conditions to assure that the
purposes of this paragraph are achieved.
A tree conservation plan will not be needed since this is an existing site and no additional trees
will be removed with the installation of the antennae and ground equipment.
Subsection 5.1.40(c)(6): The facility shall be disassembled and removed from the site within
ninety (90) days of the date its use for personal wireless service purposes is discontinued. If the
agent determines at any time that surety is required to guarantee that the facility will be removed
as required, the agent may require that the parcel owner or the owner of the facility submit a
certified check, a bond with surety, or a letter of credit, in an amount sufficient for, and
conditioned upon, the removal of the facility. The type and form of the surety guarantee shall be
5
to the satisfaction of the agent and the county attorney. In determining whether surety should be
required, the agent shall consider the following: (i) the annual report states that the tower or
pole is no longer being used for personal wireless service facilities; (ii) the annual report was
not filed; (iii) there is a change in technology that makes it likely that tower or pole will be
unnecessary in the near future; (iv) the permittee fails to comply with applicable regulations or
conditions; (v) the permittee fails to timely remove another tower or pole within the county; and
(vi) whenever otherwise deemed necessary by the agent.
Should use of the antennae site in this location become discontinued at anytime in the future,
Verizon Wireless and/or its assignee(s) will be required to remove the facility within 90 days.
Subsection 5.1.40(c)(7): The owner of the facility shall submit a report to the agent by no earlier
than May or and no later than July I of each year. The report shall identify each user of the
existing structure, and include a drawing, photograph or other illustration identifying which
equipment is owned and /or operated by each personal wireless service provider. Multiple users
on a single tower or other mounting structure may submit a single report, provided that the
report includes a statement signed by a representative from each user acquiescing in the report.
After the proposed PWSF has been installed, Verizon Wireless will submit an annual report
updating the user status and equipment inventory of the facility in the required time period.
Subsection 5.1.40(c)(8): No slopes associated with the installation of the facility and accessory
uses shall be created that are steeper than 2:1 unless retaining walls, revetments, or other
stabilization measures acceptable to the county engineer are employed.
No slopes associated with the installation of the facility are steeper than 2:1.
Subsection 5.1.40(c)(9): Any equipment cabinet not located within an existing building shall be
fenced only with the approval of the agent upon finding that the fence: (i) would protect the
facility from trespass in areas of high volumes of vehicular or pedestrian traffic or, in the rural
areas, to protect the facility from livestock or wildlife; (ii) would not be detrimental to the
character of the area; and (iii) would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general
welfare.
The applicant is requesting a modification of this section. The existing facility is not fenced, and
the applicant is not proposing to install a fence surrounding the existing and proposed facility
and ground equipment. Staff does not believe a fence would protect the facility from livestock or
wildlife, and not having a fence would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general
welfare.
Section 5.1.40(d)(2): The site shall provide adequate opportunities for screening and the facility
shall be sited to minimize its visibility from adjacent parcels and streets, regardless of their
distance from the facility. If the facility would be visible from a state scenic river or a national
park or national forest, regardless of whether the site is adjacent thereto, the facility also shall
be sited to minimize its visibility from such river, park or forest. If the facility would be located
on lands subject to a conservation easement or an open space easement, or adjacent to a
Co
conservation easement or open space easement, the facility shall be sited so that it is not visible
from any resources specifically identified for protection in the deed of easement.
The proposed monopole would replace at 53 -foot pole with a 97 -foot pole. The new pole would
be at the same height as a reference tree directly behind it.
A balloon test was conducted on October 21st, 2011 [Attachment C]. During the site visit, staff
observed a test balloon that was floated at the approximate height of the proposed monopole.
Staff travelled Interstate 64, US 250, and Newtown Road to determine the extent of visibility of
the proposal. The balloon was visible to the right side of the vehicle for approximately 1000 feet
when traveling west on I -64 for approximately 1000' approaching the VDOT Workers'
Memorial overlook, and for approximately 2300 feet when traveling east on I -64 for
approximately 2300' in the vicinity of the same overlook. From Newtown Road and US 250, the
balloon was barely visible due to distance. The balloon was not skylighted from any of these
vantage points due to the steep, wooded slope behind it.
Architectural Review Board staff reviewed this request and attended the balloon test and has
stated that this proposal is not expected to have a negative impact on the Entrance Corridor
[Attachment D]. It is staff's opinion that at the proposed height (the same as the height of the
reference tree on the steep slope behind), the level of visibility will be low and is not expected to
have a negative impact on the Entrance Corridors or adjacent properties.
Section 5.1.40(d)(3): The facility shall not adversely impact resources identified in the county's
open space plan.
This property is in a mountainous area listed in the Mountain Resource Protection Plan, and is in
an large area of critical slopes (although the site itself is flat). It is also in the Greenwood -Afton
Rural Historic District which was created after the adoption of the Open Space & Critical
Resources Plan. However, due to the limited area of the proposal and the minimal visibility of
the wireless facilities on the site, no one of these resources would be adversely impacted by this
pole replacement.
Section 5.1.40(d)(6): The top of the monopole, measured in elevation above mean sea level, shall
not exceed the height approved by the commission. The approved height shall not be more than
seven (7) feet taller than the tallest tree within twenty -five (25) feet of the monopole, and shall
include any base, foundation or grading that raises the pole above the pre- existing natural
ground elevation; provided that the height approved by the commission may be up to ten (10)
feet taller than the tallest tree if the owner of the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
commission that there is not a material difference in the visibility of the monopole at the
proposed height, rather than at a height seven (7) feet taller than the tallest tree; and there is not
a material difference in adverse impacts to resources identified in the county's open space plan
caused by the monopole at the proposed height, rather than at a height seven (7) feet taller than
the tallest tree. The applicant may appeal the commissioner's denial of a modification to the
board of supervisors as provided in subsection 5.1.40(d) (12).
7
The proposed replacement monopole would have a height of approximately 1,357 feet above
mean sea level (AMSL). The existing monopole is at a height of 1,312.7 AMSL. The height of
the reference tree is approximately 1,357 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). As proposed by the
applicant the monopole would be the same height as the reference tree. The replacement is
proposed to stay within the requirements of this section.
Section 5.1.40(d)(7): Each wood monopole shall be a dark brown natural wood color; each
metal or concrete monopole shall be painted a brown wood color to blend into the surrounding
trees. The antennas, supporting brackets, and all other equipment attached to the monopole shall
be a color that closely matches that of the monopole. The ground equipment, the ground
equipment cabinet, and the concrete pad shall also be a color that closely matches that of the
monopole, provided that the ground equipment and the concrete pad need not be of such a color
if they are enclosed within or behind an approved structure, fa(ade or fencing that: (i) is a color
that closely matches that of the monopole; (ii) is consistent with the character of the area; and
(iii) makes the ground equipment and concrete pad invisible at any time of year from any other
parcel or a public or private street.
The new antenna and all associated and equipment will be painted to match the existing facility.
Section 5.1.40(e)2: The facility shall comply with all conditions of approval of the special use
permit.
Conditions of approval are recommended below, and the facility will be held to those conditions.
Section 704(a)(7)(b)(I)(11) of The Telecommunications Act of 1996:
This application is subject to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which provides in part that
the regulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service
facilities by any State or local government or instrumentality thereof (I) shall not unreasonably
discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; (II) shall not prohibit or have
the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. 47 U.S. C.
In order to operate this facility, the applicant is required to comply with the FCC guidelines for
radio frequency emissions that are intended to protect the public health and safety. Neither the
Comprehensive Plan nor the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the provision of personal wireless
services. However, both do implement specific policies and regulations for the sighting and
design of wireless facilities. In its current state, the existing facilities and their mounting
structure all offer adequate support for providing personal wireless communication services. The
applicant has not provided any additional information regarding the availability, or absence of
alternative sites that could serve the same areas that would be covered with the proposed antenna
additions at this site. Therefore, staff does not believe that the special use permitting process nor
the denial of this application would have the effect of prohibiting or restricting the provision of
personal wireless services.
SUMMARY:
Staff has identified factors which are favorable and unfavorable to this proposal:
Factors favorable to this request include:
1. The replacement is proposed on an existing facility and will not have any visual impact to
the entrance corridor or adjacent properties.
2. The Architectural Review Board staff has recommended approval based on minimal
visibility from I -64, which is an Entrance Corridor.
Factors unfavorable to this request include:
1. none
In order to comply with Section 5.1.40(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission is
required to provide the applicant with a statement regarding the basis for denial and all items that
will have to be addressed to satisfy each requirement.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of SP 2011 -00021 Herring with the
condition listed below, and with the following modifications, based on the analysis provided
herein.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Development and use shall be in general accord with the conceptual plan titled "I -64
West — Herring Property" prepared by Stuart P. Patterson and dated 8/30/2011 (hereafter
"Conceptual Plan "), as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning
Administrator. To be in accord with the Conceptual Plan, development and use shall
reflect the following major elements within the development essential to the design of the
development, as shown on the Conceptual Plan:
a. Height
b. Mounting type
c. Antenna type
d. Number of antennae
e. Distance above reference tree
f. Color
g. Location of ground equipment
Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be
made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
Zoning Ordinance Modifications:
1. Section 5.1.40 (c)(4)- Requirement for a tree conservation plan to be submitted prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
2. Section 5.1.40 (c)(5)- The installation, operation and maintenance of the facility to be
conducted in accordance with the tree conservation plan.
X
3. Section 5.1.40(c)(9)- Fencing around the ground equipment.
10
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Site Plan
B. Vicinity Map
C. Balloon photos
D. Architectural Review Board Staff comment
Motions- Two Separate:
Motion One: The Planning Commission's role is to approve or deny modifications for Sections
5.1.40(c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(9) of the Zoning Ordinance.
A. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of Sections
5.1.40(c)(4), (c)(5), (c)(9), and (d)(6)._
I move to recommend approval of Sections 5.1.40(c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(9) for the
reasons outlined in the staff report.
B. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend denial of this Tier III personal
wireless service facility:
I move to recommend denial Sections 5.1.40(c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(9). (Planning
Commission needs to give a reason for denial)
Motion Two: The Planning Commission's role in this case (SP20110021) is to make a
recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.
A. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of this Tier III
personal wireless service facility
I move to recommend approval of SP 20110021 Herring Property Verizon Wireless
Tier III PWSF with the conditions outlined in the staff report.
B. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend denial of this Tier III personal
wireless service facility:
I move to recommend denial of SP 201100021 Herring Property Verizon Wireless
Tier III PWSF. (Planning Commission needs to give a reason for denial)
11
a
v
E
N
_.J
veriLon wireless
DIRECTIONS TO SITE
FROM RICHMOND:
TAKE 1 -64 WEST AND FOLLOW APPROXIMATELY 791 MILES TO EXIT 107 /HWY 250. TURN LEFT AT BOTTOM OF RAIIP
HEADING SOUTHWEST ON H'WY 250 /ROCKFISH GAP TURNPIKE. GO 31 MILES ON 250 AND TAKE SMALL SIDE ROAD
RUNNING PARALEL TO 250 (BROOKESVILLE RD) ON RIGHT. GO .51 MILES AND TURN RIGHT ONTO NEWTOWN RD. GO
UNDER AN OVER PASS THEN TURN LEFT ONTO GREEN HILL L.N. TAKE SECOND GRAVEL DRIVE WHICH TAKES YOU OVER
RR TRACKS.
PROJECT
SITETMOOd H H Tftan)
rP�
04 f
yNavtcwn
- - h1G�nlalA •
Hcncw
%A
i50 Eraekay.re
Naror btne <age
Auea
w
Rtcf fy
G '
AD
t �HfiG
LOCALMAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' I
North
Norlh
UTILITIES:
POWER: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
1- 888 - 667 -3000
TELEPHONE: CENTURYLINK
1- 866 - 768 -1847
APPRnVAI
I -64 WEST
HERRING PROPERTY
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA 22943
MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT
LTE (4G) UPGRADE
2 WORKING DAYS
n le
BEFORE YOU DIG
d
.}
{
_
SIGrATURE
NONE N'JVUER
DATE
RF ENGINEERING:
_
SIGNAT!;R=
e
DATE
NETWORK OPS MSt:AGER!
SIGNATU9E
PHONE MJVBER
DATE
1831 RADY CT
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23322
RICHMOND, VA 23222
1831 RADY COURT
CONTACT:
EDDIE
T. WHITE, LS
TELEPHONE:
(757)
482 -0474
FAX NUMBER:
757
482 -9870
PROJECT DATA
ZONING
RA, EC
JURISDICTION
ALBEMARL E COUNTY
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHITEHALL
PROJECT
05300000000600
SITE TYPE
EXISTING
EXISTING TOWER TYPE
SITE
EXISTING TOWER HEIGHT
52.71'
EXISTING LEASE AREA
1,200 SF
AREA OF LAND DISTURBANCE
0 SF
' -'
U.
LATITUDE:
38' 02' 50.33" N
LONGITUDE:
78' 47' 33.11" W
ELEVATION:
p
ff
FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT
FOR HUMAN HABITATION.
SITE WILL NOT BE SERVED BY CITY SEWER OR WATER.
- -
toil
VICINITY
MAP
NOT TO
SCALE
North
Norlh
UTILITIES:
POWER: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
1- 888 - 667 -3000
TELEPHONE: CENTURYLINK
1- 866 - 768 -1847
APPRnVAI
I -64 WEST
HERRING PROPERTY
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA 22943
MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT
LTE (4G) UPGRADE
2 WORKING DAYS
S:GIlATURE
BEFORE YOU DIG
®
TOLL L FREE
MISS UTILITY
EMERGENCY INFORMATION:
LOCAL FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES
(434) 296 -5833
LOCAL EMERGENCY POLICE DISPATCH
(434) 296 -5807
ACOUISITGN MANAGER'
S:GIlATURE
PHONE NUVBER
DATE
CCeNSTRUCTION MANAGER:
_
SIGrATURE
NONE N'JVUER
DATE
RF ENGINEERING:
_
SIGNAT!;R=
PHONE N.VBFR
DATE
NETWORK OPS MSt:AGER!
SIGNATU9E
PHONE MJVBER
DATE
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTION
BY
DATE
REV. NO. DESCRIPTION BY DATE
//5 REVIEW SET SPP 8/16/2011
—mil /�\ — APPLICATION SET SPP 8/30/2011
��
/�,\ SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SPP 4/11/2011
/�� \� REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SPP 5/5/2011
Z REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SPP 5/19/2011
4 PRELIMINARY ZONING DRAWINGS SPP 6/20/2011
CONSULTING TEAM
1331 L STREET NW, SUITE 600
WASHINGTON, DC 20005
PROJECT MANAGER:
STUART PATTERSON, PE
TELEPHONE:
(202)
461 -3287
FAX NUMBER:
(202)
461 -3266
SURVEYOR:
C -1
VERONA, VA 24482
CAUSEWAY CONSULTANTS, P.C.
TOWER OWNER:
C -3
1005 S. BATTLEFIELD BLVD.
SUITE B
1831 RADY CT
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23322
RICHMOND, VA 23222
1831 RADY COURT
CONTACT:
EDDIE
T. WHITE, LS
TELEPHONE:
(757)
482 -0474
FAX NUMBER:
757
482 -9870
SOIL ENGINEER:
NONE
PROJECT SUMMARY
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY OWNER:
1 -54 WEST
JAMES M. HERRING, JR &
5270 NEWTOWN HTS
JULIE ANN HERRING
GREENWOOD, VA 22943
PO BOX 1243
C -1
VERONA, VA 24482
C -2
TOWER OWNER:
C -3
VERIZON WIRELESS
APPLICAINT INFORMATION:
1831 RADY CT
VERIZON WIRELESS
RICHMOND, VA 23222
1831 RADY COURT
5
RICHMOND, VA 23222
CONTACT:
DAVID WADSWORTH
TELEPHONE:
(804) 514 -6557
FAX NUMBER:
(804) 321 -0398
PROJECT DATA
ZONING
RA, EC
JURISDICTION
ALBEMARL E COUNTY
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHITEHALL
PARCEL IDI
05300000000600
SITE TYPE
EXISTING
EXISTING TOWER TYPE
WOODPOLE
EXISTING TOWER HEIGHT
52.71'
EXISTING LEASE AREA
1,200 SF
AREA OF LAND DISTURBANCE
0 SF
GEQGRAPHIC COORDINATES:
LATITUDE:
38' 02' 50.33" N
LONGITUDE:
78' 47' 33.11" W
ELEVATION:
1259.96'
ADA COMPLIANCE•
FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT
FOR HUMAN HABITATION.
SITE WILL NOT BE SERVED BY CITY SEWER OR WATER.
INDEX OF DRAWINGS
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
GENERAL
rTE PLAN sOBMmAL
G -1
COVER SHEET
CIVIL
5/5/11
C -1
SITE PLAN
C -2
TREE INVENTORY
C -3
ELEVATION VIEW AND DETAILS
C -4
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
8/15/11
SHEET TOTAL:
PLIGTION SET
5
,tore & Engineering
1331 L STREET, INVV
SUITE 600
WASHINGTON, DC 20005
202-461-3260 FAX 2024619266
veriZon wireless
1831 RADY COURT
RICHMOND, VA 23222
OF
o
STUART?. PATTERSON
Lic. No. 41047
O>\TAL
SRE lwo.:
1 -64 WEST
LTE (4G)
UPGRADE
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA
22943
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
I TTVDATE- 7/1/11 1
SIT+.
DESCRvnON
DATE
rTE PLAN sOBMmAL
4/11/11
z
REVISED srTE PLAN SUBMITTAL
5/5/11
REVISED SRE PLAN SUBMITTAL
5/19/11
c
PRELIMINARY ZONING DRAWINGS
6/20/11
f
REVIEW SET
8/15/11
A.
PLIGTION SET
6/30/11
SFEET NAME
COVER SHEET
SFEET NO-,
G -1
LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS SURVEY NOTES
EXISTING NEW ® AT 1. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFORMED BY CAUSEWAY
0 DIAMETER CONSULTANTS, P.C. P. 0. BOX 15039. CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA,
Con'c NUMBER 23328 - 50394, PHONE: 757 -482 -0474.
CO ^!CRETE A/C AIR CONDITIONING
-- PROPERTY LINE ACT AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES 2. COORDINATES AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN WERE ESTABLISHED
ACT USING STATIC CPS OBSERVATIONS, POST PROCESSED THROUGH
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —� — — — — • — • —LEASE AREA AFG ABOVE FINISHED GRADE NOAA'S OPUS WEBSITE AND CONVERTED TO NAVD 88 AND NAD
I \ AGL ABOVE GROUND LEVEL 83, U.S SURVEY FOOT, FOR THE VERTICAL DATUM AND
ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING HORIZONTAL COORDINATES, RESPECTIVELY, USING U.S. ARMY
BUILDING (FOOTPRINT)
AND MATERIALS CORPS OF ENGINEERS CORPSCON SOFTWARE, VERSION 5.11.
J F BELL I 'c(p /p POKER POLE C, C/L CENTERLINE
FUIIERAL HOME INC COMM COMMISSION 3. NO SUB - SURFACE INVESTIGATION WAS PERFORMED BY
DB 434 PG 351 1 3X LICHT POLE CONC CONCRETE CAUSEWAY CONSULTANTS, P.C. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT
T/p
05300000000400 DA DIAMETER GUARANTEE THE "EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE' OF
1 11.25 ACRES I O TELEPHONE /FlBEROPTIC PEDESTAL D.B. DEED BOOK UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR
FRED!=RIC S POCOCK & ZONE RA DWG(S) DRAWINGS EXCAVATION, CONTACT MISS UTILITY AT 1- 800 - 552 -7001 TO
N MARY B RITZ C/O SCOTT I —FOE— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC CONFIRM THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND
& �BRti33 FFL L0642NC I EOE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
UTILITIES.
05300000000500 ASPHALT
315.42 C
AAES ` F(F) FOUND THIS SURVEY WAS DONE WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE
TOP OF SLOPE REPORT AND MAY NOT DEPICT ANY OR ALL EASEMENTS THAT
FIRM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION 4. M FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP MAY AFFECT THE PROPERTY.
1 FO FIBEROPTIC
J MES M JR I - TOE OF SLOPE CA GAUGE 5. PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS
J LIE A HERRIN GIs GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
RAILROAD TRACKS SYSTEM OF RECORD.
CARTER, BESSIE & 05300000000600 1 I GPIN GRID PARCEL IDENTIFICATION
`1
6. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
FREDERIC S BOCOCK 84 83.417 ACRES I TEMPORARY BENCHMARK NUMBER
MARY B HITZ TRS
ZONE RA EC CPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM THE RIGHT -OF -WAY, PROPERTY LINE AND/OR EASEMENTS
DB 727 PG 520 I rvwvw� TREELINE HYD HYDRANT SHOWN HEREON REPRESENT A COMPILATION OF RECORDED
053000000003DO I ID DENTIFICATION DEEDS, PLATS, G.I.S. RECORDS AND TAX MAPS.
1 502.25 ACRES 2 INC INCORPORATED
ZONE RA C2 J I TREE INV INVERT 7. THE AREA OF THE EXISTING CELL TOWER APPEARS TO LIE
�����i1 INFO INFORMATION WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "X ", ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL
KW KILOWATT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY - NATIONAL FLOOD LBS JP.PAES M JR & I L/P P6HTDPOLE INSURANCE
FEBRUARY 4,02005.m NUMBER 5100300225 D. DATED
JULIE A HERRINGLG LONG
- - - - -�� - DB 1587 PG 645 I LLC LIMITED ED LIABILITY CORPORATION B. THE EXISTENCE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, VEGETATED WETLANDS,
05300000000600 LS LAND SURVEYOR OR TIDAL WETLANDS, WAS NEITHER INVESTIGATED. NOR
7.004 ACRES MAX MAXIMIM CONFIRMED DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS SURVEY.
— — — — — — — — — — ZONE RA— — MIN MINIMUM
- - — — — — —
MPH MILES PER HOUR 9. TREE SPECIES CALLED OUT ARE APPROXIMATE. SPECIE TO BE
PARCEL VIEW N NORTH VERIFIED BY AN ARBORIST.
NW NORTHWEST
C -1 NOT TO SCALE NAD NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
NAVD NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL
DATUM
NO NUMBER ® LEASE NOTES
OPS OPERATION
OSHA OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY
AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
P/P POWER POLE 1. NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 20' WIDE ACCESS / UTILITY
P.B. PLAT BOOK EASEMENT.
L PE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
1 ` PG. PAGE 2. NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 30• x 40' LEASE AREA
\ PROJ. PROJECT
PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT
1 PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
PVC POLYVINYLCHLORIDE
-- R/W RIGHT OF WAY
RAD RADIATING
CI _ / REQ'D REQUIRED
N
EXISTING GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD I RF RADIO FREQUENCY
SCH SCHEDULE
SF SQUARE FOOT /FEET
STD STANDARD
C� TOO TOP OF CONCRETE
ii TPED TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
SEE ENLARGED SHE 1 i / /.
PLAN, SHEET C -2 TTV TECHNICAL TEAM VISIT
TYP TYPICAL
\ VDOT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
— — Exv'n- 51,71' i/ \ \ TRANSPORTATION
W9 POE / iii // W WEST
WCF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
FACILITY
WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC
GRAPHIC SCALE(S)
`- CV57 -WG 6816' / � N HILL LANE
WOW P^CE GREE FOR 24" X 36" PLOT - 1" = 100' 0 100• 200•
5914' / / FOR 11" X 17" PLOT - 1".= 200'
wxo �xE
P2 SITE PLAN
C -1 SCALE: 1" =100'
-ture & Engineerin&
1331 L STREET, NW
SUITE 600
WASHINGTON, CC 20005
202461.3260 FAX 202461.3266
veri� wireless
1831 RADY COURT
RICHMOND, VA 23222
U STUARTP.PATTERSON
Lic. No. 41047
,•d,� S-3o_d wW�
O
sm 160.:
1 -64 WEST
LTE (4G)
UPGRADE
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA
22943
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
COMM. NO. 3036.W
SUBMITTALS
sYM.
DESCI vnON
DATE
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
4/11/11
i
REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
5/5/11
a
REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
5/19/11
REUMINARf ZONING DRAWINGS
6/20/11
a
REVIEW SET
8/16/11
A,
kPPLrATION SET
8/30/11
sr+E�r r AM
SITE PLAN
C -1
TREE INVENTORY
NUMBER
SPECIES
CALIPER
CANOPY HEIGHT
AGL HEIGHT
(71)
MAPLE
24"
1323' AMSL
52'
(436)
OAK
6"
1289' AMSL
25'
(438)
OAK
4"
1288' AMSL
22'
(440)
CAK
6"
1302' AMSL
36'
(442)
PARADISE
6'
1305' AMSL
40'
(444)
PARADISE
6°
1310' AMSL
45'
(446)
PARADISE
6"
1305' AMSL
34'
(449)
PERSIMMON
8"
1300' AMSL
27'
(451)
OAK
8"
1318' AMSL
40'
(453)
OAK
B.
1325' AMSL
48'
(455)
MAPLE
24"
1308' AMSL
36'
(457)
OAK
12"
1335' AMSL
51'
(459)
OAK
12"
1329' AMSL
49'
(461)
OAK
12"
1314' AMSL
37'
(667)
OAK
6"
1328' AMSL
50'
(668)
POPLAR
4"
1322' AMSL
45'
(670)
POPLAR
10"
1328' AMSL
51'
(701)
POPLAR
4"
1297' AMSL
30'
(703)
POPLAR
4"
1297' AMSL
31'
(705)
1 POPLAR
4"
1293' AMSL
26'
(707)
LOCUST
4"
1307' AMSL
37'
(709)
POPLAR
4"
1299' AMSL
26'
(711)
BIRCH
6"
1314' AMSL
35'
(713)
POPLAR
6"
1322' AMSL
41'
(715)
POPLAR
18"
1357' AMSL
75'
(717)
POPLAR
8"
1339' AMSL
57'
(719)
POPLAR
8-TWIN
1341' AMSL
60'
(721)
POPLAR
6"
1342' AMSL
60'
(723)
POPLAR
6"
1317' AMSL
40'
(725)
POPLAR
4"
1318' AMSL
40'
(727)
POPLAR
6-TWIN
1308' AMSL
29'
(729)
POPLAR
12"
1341' AMSL
58'
(731)
POPLAR
6"
1301' AMSL
23'
(733)
POPLAR
4"
1299' AMSL
22'
(735)
OAK
6"
1311' AMSL
36'
(737)
POPLAR
6"
1312' AMSL
37'
(739)
POPLAR
6"
1304' AMSL
31'
(742)
POPLAR
6"
1298' AMSL
36'
*TOTAL TREES TO BE REMOVED:--O-
NOTE: REFERENCE TREE IS IDENTIFIED ABOVE IN BOLD.
NOTE: TREE DRIPLINES ARE DRAWN
£XISTLNC T NO3LE
JO" X ,�7" [EASE A, ?EA
ExisRNC r-- uoa�Lf
EOUIPMENr CN
sr€sL PL4TFORAI
n
6
Y % fxisriNC E
wr'OU POLE
FU7PL:R (742)
\ TOE OF SLOPE 'I
F --. - -L
TO SCALE.
fXl5P,h'6 Ed 16'
WCGU PGCE -� � }
ExLSP„VG ICE
D / IBM
1 ` CORNER OF CONC PAD
Exr5FWG 69J4' \ . / \ ELEVATION = 1260.12
WGi70
V-1-
� n,--v
o
2 ---- ----- - - --
_____-- - - - - -- - - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -I GRAPHIC SCALES)
E /�PE1
TARY -�
-- 7
/
J XFRN
FX1SrINc WOOo
- —� ,_z,: —T:•ze
EOU. ✓.yEVr ON
COh'C PAD
AFPRO1,RRA7F LCC4T1JN
OF NTELOS 20' X 20'
CEASE FRFA
NOTES
1. TREE INVENTORY PREPARED BY CAUSEWAY CONSULTANTS ON
4/6/11.
2. EXTREME CARE SHALL BE TAKEN NOT TO DAMAGE EXISTING
TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF
COMPENSATION OF DAMAGED TREES.
4. SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A TREE
CONSERVATION PLAN TO BE PREPARED BY A CERTIFIED
ARBORIST, AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 5.1.4U(C)(4).
5. AN ARBORIST HAS NOT CONFIRMED THE SPECIES OF THE
TREES SHOWN IN THE TREE INVENTORY.
® CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 97' MONOPOLE TOWER. SEE
ELEVATION VIEW, SHEET C -3.
® LEASE NOTES
1. NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 20' WIDE ACCESS / UTILITY
EASEMENT.
/ - y 2. NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 30' x 40' LEASE AREA.
/ I
Q
°
��� j fK 574'G rFEEL /h! Atf a
- - - - C4NCPY EZEYATON - 1J0' ALIBC
Pm,V 0 txJS/LYG
NOLL I?29' lYP -
fX751LNG U,7LlTY
SERNCE StMU
EA'LsrlNc u£P+z9.V
AIREC£SS f.^67Fi4/d 1111 ON
S M PLA'TL: "N
FOR 24" X 36" PLOT - 1" = 10' 0 5' 10' 20'
FOR 11' X 17" PLOT - 1' = 20'
-ture & Engineering
1331 L STREET, NW
SUITE 600
WASHINGTON, DC 20005
202-461.3260 FAX 202 -461.3266
ver!Z n wireless
1831 RADY COURT
RICHMOND, VA 23222
�tiTx of
o� STUART P. PATTERSON
C3 �
Lic. No. 41047
1116 g wy
���`rSIONAL -�����
SM INFO--
1 -64 WEST
LTE (4G)
UPGRADE
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA
22943
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
DESIGN:
R- POPLAR (719)
DRAWN:
ENS
la" POPLAR (715)
REFERENCE TREE IS 18" POPLAR (715)
TTV DATE:
12' IOPLV (729)
B- PCPLAR (717)
SUBMITTALS
6- POPLAR (727)
_ 6" POPUR (72 1)
DBCW n0N
DATE
6' O4ir 1667)
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
6' POLAR (71J)�
N
5/5/11
/ G POPLAR (7J9)
REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
6- 6.'FLY1 (711) -�
4- POPLAR (669)
PRELIMINARY ZONINC DRAWINGS
6120111
/
VIEW SET
RECAT
4' POPLAR (725)
��s
re\
PUIDN SET
6- POLAR (731) c
' 25' REFERENCE TREE
6- PLOPLAR (72J)
TOWER SETBACK
4' POPLAR (73J)
4- POPLAR (709)
10' PLAR (670) l
6" 041f (7J5)
y 4' �P&t? (70J)
EXCSPNO VERIZR/
X1RELE55 SLY
4 "ZOCU57T (707)
/ 4' POPLAR (701)
NO;O PoLf
(
£XISTLNC T NO3LE
JO" X ,�7" [EASE A, ?EA
ExisRNC r-- uoa�Lf
EOUIPMENr CN
sr€sL PL4TFORAI
n
6
Y % fxisriNC E
wr'OU POLE
FU7PL:R (742)
\ TOE OF SLOPE 'I
F --. - -L
TO SCALE.
fXl5P,h'6 Ed 16'
WCGU PGCE -� � }
ExLSP„VG ICE
D / IBM
1 ` CORNER OF CONC PAD
Exr5FWG 69J4' \ . / \ ELEVATION = 1260.12
WGi70
V-1-
� n,--v
o
2 ---- ----- - - --
_____-- - - - - -- - - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -I GRAPHIC SCALES)
E /�PE1
TARY -�
-- 7
/
J XFRN
FX1SrINc WOOo
- —� ,_z,: —T:•ze
EOU. ✓.yEVr ON
COh'C PAD
AFPRO1,RRA7F LCC4T1JN
OF NTELOS 20' X 20'
CEASE FRFA
NOTES
1. TREE INVENTORY PREPARED BY CAUSEWAY CONSULTANTS ON
4/6/11.
2. EXTREME CARE SHALL BE TAKEN NOT TO DAMAGE EXISTING
TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF
COMPENSATION OF DAMAGED TREES.
4. SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A TREE
CONSERVATION PLAN TO BE PREPARED BY A CERTIFIED
ARBORIST, AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 5.1.4U(C)(4).
5. AN ARBORIST HAS NOT CONFIRMED THE SPECIES OF THE
TREES SHOWN IN THE TREE INVENTORY.
® CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 97' MONOPOLE TOWER. SEE
ELEVATION VIEW, SHEET C -3.
® LEASE NOTES
1. NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 20' WIDE ACCESS / UTILITY
EASEMENT.
/ - y 2. NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 30' x 40' LEASE AREA.
/ I
Q
°
��� j fK 574'G rFEEL /h! Atf a
- - - - C4NCPY EZEYATON - 1J0' ALIBC
Pm,V 0 txJS/LYG
NOLL I?29' lYP -
fX751LNG U,7LlTY
SERNCE StMU
EA'LsrlNc u£P+z9.V
AIREC£SS f.^67Fi4/d 1111 ON
S M PLA'TL: "N
FOR 24" X 36" PLOT - 1" = 10' 0 5' 10' 20'
FOR 11' X 17" PLOT - 1' = 20'
-ture & Engineering
1331 L STREET, NW
SUITE 600
WASHINGTON, DC 20005
202-461.3260 FAX 202 -461.3266
ver!Z n wireless
1831 RADY COURT
RICHMOND, VA 23222
�tiTx of
o� STUART P. PATTERSON
C3 �
Lic. No. 41047
1116 g wy
���`rSIONAL -�����
SM INFO--
1 -64 WEST
LTE (4G)
UPGRADE
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA
22943
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
DESIGN:
SPP
DRAWN:
ENS
REVIEW:
RAC
TTV DATE:
211111
COMM. NO. 3036.W
SUBMITTALS
SYM.
DBCW n0N
DATE
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
4/11/11
REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
5/5/11
REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
5/19/11
PRELIMINARY ZONINC DRAWINGS
6120111
VIEW SET
RECAT
8/16 /11
��s
re\
PUIDN SET
6/30/11
FREE INVENTORY
SHUT NO-'
C-2
12" MAX
ICE OF NEW
4TENNA
YP OF 3)
OUNTING COLLAR
YP OF 2)
OUNTING PIPE
YP OF 3)
FACE OF NEW LTE (4G)
ANTENNA
(TYP OF 3)
OF NEW MONOPOLE
JI(a:)ENLARGED VIEW
C -3 NOT TO SCALE
TOWER BOLTS
(1YP) �
. `vl
ram �y
0 I C23 EDNLoARGED VIEW SCALE
TOP OF TOWER APPURTENANCES (UCHTING_ROD) _
ELEVATION = [1359'] AMSL - -_
18" MAX
TOP OF TOWER / TOP OE ANTENNAS- - - - - - - TOP cF CA112?Y
ELEVATION - [13571 AMA - -
- — ELEVATION [1351'] AMSL �
(3) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS FLUSH MOUNTED PANEL ANTENNAS
Y ELEVATION = [93.0'1] A.G.L.
/�`'}- —(3) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS FLUSH MOUNTED PANEL ANTENNAS
-47 ELEVATION [84.5'f] A.G.L - - - - - -
ELEVATION VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
EXISTING ANTENNAS TO
BE RELOCATED
TREE,
1310.5 AMSL
EXISTING REPEATER
ANTENNA TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING RF SCREEN
TO BE REMOVED--\
EXISTING REPEATER
TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING 52.7' A.G.L.
(1312.7 AMSL)
WOODPOLE TO BE
REMOVED
TONER FOUNDATION BY
TOWER MANUFACTURER
�[j
ZQ
IN
NEW VEIUON WIRELESS 97' A.G.L. MONOPOLE
'HEIGHT INCLUDES ABOVE GROUND FOUNDATION AND BOLT HEIGHTS.
SEE DETAIL 2, THIS SHEET.
30' MAX /
REFERENCE TREE IDENTIFIED AS 18' POPLAR' I
HEIGHT = 1357' AMSL, 75' A.G.L.
EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION
_ _8tGINhIING OF POLE
SUBMITTALS
ELEVATION = [1260.83'] A1ASL
\ \��
_ --TOP_ OF FOUNDATION
-Ilk
ELEVATION = [1260.50'] AMSL
4/11/11
__FINISHED GRADE 0 TOWER AMSL
REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
ELEVATION — [1260.00'] AMSL
A,
rchitecture & EngineerinS
1331 L STREET, NW
SUITE 600
WASHINGTON, DC 20005
202.461.3260 FAX 202.461.3266
WAN W.CLARKNEXSFN.COM
verizon wireless
1831 RADY COURT
RICHMOND, VA 23222
o����tiTH OF
STUART R PA SON
U 9
Lic. No. 41047
rG�`rsl ONA L
SITE INFO.:
1 -64 WEST
LTE (4G)
UPGRADE
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA
22943
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
COMM. NO. 3036.W
SUBMITTALS
SYM.
DSCRPTION
DATE
1
SITE PLAN SUBMffTAL
4/11/11
1
REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
5/5/11
A,
REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
5/19/11
PRELIMINARY ZONING DRAWINGS
6/2D/11
y
REVIEW SET
8/16/11
/
A.
PUCAMN sEr
8/3D/11
SHWr NAME
ELEVATION VIEW
AND DETAILS
I I
7
E
S
i
4
Y5---- - --- --
(D LPIN(S)
4"-O-LAP
--------------------- -
-
------ ----------------------------------------------- 4';-0, 1AR
0• a, >PaR
u 2 1
E "POPLAR - .___.
Q1. IfN (S) 7
• EXIETIA'6 5T. 45' W'rN GEN P(CG
'y Itiv^C'& PO!E EX5T/h'G UTILTY
. 7 TER17CE SrAN'D
7 Exrsrnvc TLCO
• r- -T -T! - - - - - ---
1 • ,L I 1 1 / �'
EX577A'C
I I '
• I I E95RVC 650 /dW 0140
I I C46MET 0,5= FiRtrE
11 I EasnNO %
I I ox l poz
I I I L
------ - - - - J
fMOL'lLE .tl' � X ,YJ' �
!EASE 4Pr
o '�, EXSDNQ' 650 MNZ PON!? 2
�175f,NC CA &"/ETA, &N STEEL PP'ME
a 5C4L 4h1J
' FC✓Np4P0N 5LCCN
o 0
I.PIN(S)
e
r �� L
--__ U L /KLAW-J • -• - EFC-Yb(PA ,V?C p • - • -• - �- _ E• e
.SS'vC _ _ _
LXG? E6101 Xp_ rt S LgA1r LO
4 C
_
a'
T
.. - .- . -. -. -.
N:3905034.87 l
E:11398668.21
TOP OF CONCRETE
ELEV. = 1260.5
F-- - - - - -� _ _-
�:_, 7
�tT-- -7-It� �•
I I I I I
I f` 10 I I
I _1 I
1
I I rAl- -
Actrzp� lu7E L.: - oN
ELEVATION UY 1.126 .12
� ELEVATION = 1260.12
,
1- PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME
I
I
1 I
r F, T-1
1331 L STREET, NW
I I I I
I I I 1
I
1
uflr R
WASHINGTON, DC 20005
I �0! 1ARp I I
202.461.3260 FAX 202461.3266
811. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
4
vrrrrr.aazv:ecsetv.co,H
REPAIRING, AT HIS EXPENSE, ANY EXISTING UTILITIES DAMAGED
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA
L-- - - - - -J
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
22943
2. THE STOCKPILING OF EXCESS MATERIAL ON SITE WILL NOT BE
2.0'
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
&o!LARO
7
� /
RYE
Vert n wireless
3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANS AND METHODS
E:Y/ST.;YP 51.71'
o�/�
OF CONSTRUCTION. SAFETY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
&01-420
10. FUTURE CELLULAR RADIO CABINET (850 MHZ)
1831 RADY COURT
I /
ii. FUTURE 6' X 12' CONCRETE PAD FOR GENERATOR
RICHMOND, A, VA 23222
SUBMITTALS
3m
025i"W
u011A:70
_
Actrzp� lu7E L.: - oN
ELEVATION UY 1.126 .12
� ELEVATION = 1260.12
GY N'Ei i >S . %L X ZO
1- PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME
rchitecture & Engineering
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LOCATING ANY UNDERGROUND
1331 L STREET, NW
UTILITIES (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST AND CROSS
tSEZESS 700 AMP
1
uflr R
NOTES
Srm INFO.:
1- PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME
rchitecture & Engineering
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LOCATING ANY UNDERGROUND
1331 L STREET, NW
UTILITIES (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST AND CROSS
1. NEW VERIZON
ELEVATION WIRELESS C-3. MONOPOLE TOWER. SEE
SUITE 600
THROUGH THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION THAT ARE NOT SHOWN
WASHINGTON, DC 20005
ON THESE PLANS. BEFORE YOU DIG, CALL "MISS UTILITY" AT
202.461.3260 FAX 202461.3266
811. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
vrrrrr.aazv:ecsetv.co,H
REPAIRING, AT HIS EXPENSE, ANY EXISTING UTILITIES DAMAGED
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA
6. 7' X 7' CONCRETE PAD FOR LTE EQUIPMENT
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
22943
2. THE STOCKPILING OF EXCESS MATERIAL ON SITE WILL NOT BE
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
ALLOWED.
DESIGN: CCC
Vert n wireless
3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANS AND METHODS
9. FUTURE PCS RADIO CABINET (1900 MHZ)
o�/�
OF CONSTRUCTION. SAFETY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR. ALL WORK SHAL L BE PERFORMED IN
10. FUTURE CELLULAR RADIO CABINET (850 MHZ)
1831 RADY COURT
ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA REQUIREMENTS.
ii. FUTURE 6' X 12' CONCRETE PAD FOR GENERATOR
RICHMOND, A, VA 23222
4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE LAYOUT
CONSTRUCTION STAKING. LOCATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES
AND UTILITIES MUST BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. aXXII op
5. ALL WORK SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ALL LOCAL, STATE. AND FEDERAL CODES OR ORDINANCES. O
Gr ,
STUART P. PATTERSON
0 DEMOLITION NOTES Lic. No. 41047
g so -1i y
1. REMOVE EXISTING WOOD POLE .w
O��
2. REMOVE EXISTING ICE BRIDGE ��S
3. REMOVE EXISTING BOLLARD
I� S` UINAL
® LEASE NOTES . RRELIMINAR z °NWD oRA "'NOS 6 /20/
a REVIEW SET - -- 8/16/
a APPUCATION SET 8/30/
1. VERIZON WIRELESS 20' ACCESS / UTILTIY EASEMENT.
2. VERIZON WIRELESS 30' X 40' LEASE AREA. SHWr NAM
ENLARGED SITE
GRAPHIC SCALE(S) PLAN
FOR 24" X 36" PLOT - 1" = 2.5' 0 2.5' 5'
FOR 11" X 17' PLOT - 1" = 5'
SHR T NO.:
C -4
Srm INFO.:
® CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1 -64 WEST
LTE (4G)
UPGRADE
1. NEW VERIZON
ELEVATION WIRELESS C-3. MONOPOLE TOWER. SEE
2. SERVICE STAND
3. FIBER MESA CABINET BY VERIZON LANDUNE
4. LTE RADIO & BB CABINETS ON DOUBLE STACK FLOOR STAND
5. LTE BBU
8270 NEWTOWN HTS
GREENWOOD, VA
6. 7' X 7' CONCRETE PAD FOR LTE EQUIPMENT
22943
7. ICE BRIDGE
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
8. FUTURE STEEL PLATFORM ON CONCRETE FOOTERS
DESIGN: CCC
DRAWN. KAW
9. FUTURE PCS RADIO CABINET (1900 MHZ)
REVIEW. SPP
TTV DATE: 211111
10. FUTURE CELLULAR RADIO CABINET (850 MHZ)
COMM. NO. 3036.W
ii. FUTURE 6' X 12' CONCRETE PAD FOR GENERATOR
SUBMITTALS
3m
DESCRIPTION
DATE
ITE PLAN SL/8MI1TP1
//I�
/a\
REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
I S /S /T
® LEASE NOTES . RRELIMINAR z °NWD oRA "'NOS 6 /20/
a REVIEW SET - -- 8/16/
a APPUCATION SET 8/30/
1. VERIZON WIRELESS 20' ACCESS / UTILTIY EASEMENT.
2. VERIZON WIRELESS 30' X 40' LEASE AREA. SHWr NAM
ENLARGED SITE
GRAPHIC SCALE(S) PLAN
FOR 24" X 36" PLOT - 1" = 2.5' 0 2.5' 5'
FOR 11" X 17' PLOT - 1" = 5'
SHR T NO.:
C -4
SP201100021 Herring N
0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet
Balloon -test photo from VDOT Workers' Memorial on I -64 East
ment C
Balloon -test photo from Newtown Road, south of I -64
ALg�,��
�'IRGINZ�`
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
MEMORANDUM
TO: Scott Clark
FROM: Margaret Maliszewski
RE: SP- 2011 -21: Herring (Verizon) and ARB- 2011 -104: Herring (Verizon)
DATE: October 26, 2011
At the balloon test conducted on October 21, 2011, the balloon was visible:
1) Traveling west on I -64 for approximately 1000' approaching the Newtown Overlook, and
2) Traveling east on I -64 for approximately 2300' in the vicinity of the Newtown Overlook.
The site is located approximately 600' from the median of the I -64 Entrance corridor. The balloon was
clearly visible but it was never sky -lit. Based on the balloon test, the pole will be more visible than some of
the existing poles at this location due to its height above the trees that stand in front of it. However, the site
has a substantial wooded backdrop and wooded surround, and the character of the highway traveling along
the wooded mountain is such that noticeability is limited. Ground equipment will not be visible from the
EC and The level of visibility of the proposed replacement monopole is not expected to have a negative
impact on the Entrance Corridor.