HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201400030 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2014-04-15ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB- 2014 -30: Acme Stove
Review Type
Initial Site Plan and Preliminary Architectural Review
Parcel Identification
045131050A00900
Location
On Seminole Lane, east of Rt. 29, approximately 400' north of Hilton Heights Road
Zoned
Highway Commercial (HC), Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner /Applicant
IWE LLC /Collins Engineering (Scott Collins)
Magisterial District
Rio
Proposal
To construct an 8,000 sf commercial building with associated site improvements.
Context
The subject parcel is located amidst commercial development on Rt. 29 North. It is situated between the Floors R Us
building (which predates the establishment of the EC) and the Wilco Hess gas station/convenience store (which was
reviewed and approved by the ARB). The proposed building would be located 10' north of the convenience store. A
wooded slope is at the back of the site, with residential properties up and beyond. Seminole Lane and Seminole Trail (Rt.
29) are to the west. There is no landscaping in the grass strip between Seminole Lane and Rt. 29. Brown Auto is across Rt.
29 to the west.
Visibility
The development will be readily visible from the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor. Visibility of the south elevation of the building
(right side) will be limited by the proximity of the convenience store.
ARB Meeting Date
April 21, 2014
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY On August 14, 2002 the ARB reviewed a proposal (ARB- 2002 -65) to expand the vehicle display at Dan's Automart on this
parcel, and recommended no objection with conditions. Comments were also provided on the preliminary site design. The project did not move forward.
ANALYSIS
Gray highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final
Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage
Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial
REF
GUIDELINE
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development
The proposed building is L- shaped. The
Revise the wall material to
within the designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that
wings of the L have walls of painted brick.
unpainted brick that is
new development within the corridors reflects the
A stone -faced tower rises from the
coordinated with nearby
traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the
northwest corner of the western wing and
buildings. Indicate the
purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that
is taller than the rest of the building. The
trellis material and color on
proposed development within the designated Entrance
tower has openings at its base on three
the drawings. Provide
Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the
sides. As a focus of the design, it would be
material and color samples
gm icant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures
expected to mark the building entrance, but
for review.
of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote
it does not. Without this function, the
orderly and attractive development within these corridors.
tower appears to be primarily a place to
Revise the architectural
Applicants should note that replication of historic structures
is
install signage.
design to coordinate the
neither required nor desired.
A trellis runs along the inside of the L, and
tower and the entrance.
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the
Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites
extends beyond the building to the north.
Provide details to clarify
as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order
Metal canopies are provided over the
the appearance of the trellis
to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and
windows and doors, including the main
and canopies.
vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines
entrance to the building, on the north
require attention to four primary factors: compatibility
elevation of the western wing. The tower
Show the tower and trellis
with significant historic sites in the area; the character of
and trellis do not appear on the site plan.
on the site plan.
the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and
landscaping.
Material samples and color information
have not yet been provided. The proposed
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windowA
doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible
building scale, basic material selections
with the forms and features of the significant historic
(brick and stone), and the general building
_
buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to)
form appear to be compatible with the
the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design
historic architecture of the area. However,
guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met
unpainted brick is more consistent with the
through scale, materials, and forms which may be
majority of brick buildings in the County
embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
and painted brick can be a maintenance
traditional. The replication of important historic sites in
concern. Unpainted brick would provide
Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines.
for a more consistent appearance.
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing
Brick relates to the adjacent convenience
Provide a street elevation
structures should respect the traditions of the architecture
store and several other buildings in the
showing the form, size and
of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville
immediate area. The stone proposed for the
scale of the proposed
and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in
tower relates to the stone used in the
building with the adjacent
the area, as well as drawings of architectural features,
Brown Auto building across the street.
buildings.
which provide important examples of this tradition are
contained in Appendix A.
The size of the proposed building is within
the range of nearby buildings. The building
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as
a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility
would be located only 10' from the
with the area's historic structures is not intended to
convenience store, so coordination is
impose a rigid design solution for new development.
important. Providing a street elevation
Replication of the design of the important historic sites id
showing the proposed building together
the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's
with the adjacent buildings would clarify
standard of compatibility can be met through building
the relationship.
scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in
architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional.
The Guidelines allow individuality in design to
accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional
requirements.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to
establish a pattern of compatible architectural
characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order
to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should
demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within
the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is
substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking
a careful balance between harmonizing new development
with the existing character of the corridor and achieving
compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding
context of buildings.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale.
Scale should be integral to the building and site design.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor
should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a
cohesive whole.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting
devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within
a development.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building
The brick walls that face the EC have no
Revise the building to
design should be relieved using design detail or
windows, doors or architectural detailing.
include architectural
vegetation, or both.
The blank elevation of the northern wing is
fronted by the trellis that runs along the L.
detailing to relieve the
blankness of the walls
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the
A sign is shown at the top of the EC- facing
facing the EC.
front of long buildings as necessary to soften the
wall of the western wing. The area
appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type
between this wall and the front property
of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the
line ranges in depth from 32' to 50'. The
length, height, and blankness of such walls.
area is occupied by a rain garden with four
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings,
trees and ten shrubs. The character of this
and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and
landscaping does not appear to be
structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs.
sufficient to mitigate a completely blank
Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
wall facing the EC.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be
The building does not appear to be a
None.
modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines.
trademark design.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be
Details on window glass have not been
Provide window glass
highly tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the
provided.
information on the plan
Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria:
showing that visible light
Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below
transmittance (VLT) shall
40 %. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed
not drop below 40% and
30 %. Specifications on the proposed window glass should
visible light reflectance
be submitted with the application for final review.
(VLR) shall not exceed
30 %.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated
A dumpster with a screening fence is
Provide a dumpster detail in
into the overall plan of development and shall, to tffl
proposed in the northeast corner of the
the plan.
extent possible, be compatible with the building designs
parking lot. In this location, the dumpster
sed on the site.
is expected to have minimal impact on the
EC, but a detail of the fence is needed on
Indicate the height of the
mechanical equipment
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from
the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting,
the plan.
proposed behind the
these features will still have a negative visual impact on the
building, and adjust the
Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to
Mechanical equipment is proposed to be
planting height of the
eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c.
located on a concrete pad behind the
screening shrubs to match
Refuse areas, d. Storage areas,
building at the northern end of the northern
the equipment height.
e. Mechanical equipment, £ Above - ground utilities, and
wing. Screening shrubs are proposed on
g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and similar
the north side of the pad to further limit
Show the locations and
security fencing devices.
visibility. The shrubs are proposed at 18" —
heights of the rooftop
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design
30" high at planting. Minimum shrub
equipment on the plans and
the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation arld.Uliki
height should match the equipment height
elevations. Include a
consist o£ a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing.
to ensure visibility is eliminated. Rooftop
section showing that the
equipment is also proposed. Locations and
equipment will not be
heights are needed on the plans and
visible from the EC.
elevations to show that the parapets will
fully screen the equipment from view.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the
The note appears on the cover sheet of the
Add the standard
architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment
site plan. It is also needed on the
mechanical equipment note
from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
architectural drawings.
to the architectural
drawings.
Lighting
The plan shows wall - mounted lights, but a
Provide a complete lighting
lighting plan has not been submitted for
plan for review.
review.
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping
The site of the proposed development
Provide an additional EC
are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of
fronts on Seminole Lane, which runs
tree at 3%2" caliper.
many of the area's significant historic sites which is
parallel to the Route 29 Entrance Corridor
characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping
in front of the site, from the Real Estate 3
Provide interspersed
should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor
offices at the south to the Riverside Center
ornamental trees,
and help to integrate buildings into the existing
Shopping Center at the north. The grass
distributed along the
environment of the corridor.
strip between Seminole Lane and Rt. 29
includes no trees or shrubs. Consequently,
frontage of the property.
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be
obtained by planting different types of plant materials that
31/2" caliper trees, 35' on center, are
share similar characteristics. Such common elements
appropriate for the frontage of this
allow for more flexibility in the design of structures
property. 3'/2" caliper Willow Oaks are
because common landscape features will help to
proposed. At 35' on center, 6 or 7 trees
harmonize the appearance of development as seen from
would be appropriate for the 230' frontage.
the street upon which the Corridor is centered.
However, two entrance /exits to the site are
proposed, and the front of the site is
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor
streets should include the following:
occupied primarily by stormwater
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the
facilities, utilities and easements. This
Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 31/2
limits planting area such that only 5
inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and
frontage trees are provided and
should be of a plant species common to the area. Such
landscaping is relegated to "leftover"
trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center.
space.
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the
area should be interspersed among the trees required by the
Two Yoshino cherry trees are proposed in
preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not
locations flanking the southern stormwater
alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be
facility. These are ornamental trees, but the
planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing
quantity and distribution is not sufficient to
pattern.
meet the intent of the "interspersed"
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board
requirement.
fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align
the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the
foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved
parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of
road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
There are no roads proposed at the interior
None.
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior
of the site.
roads. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper
(measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a
plant species common to the area. Such trees should be
located at least every 40 feet on center.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
A sidewalk is provided from Seminole
None.
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior
Lane to the building, and along the L of the
pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches
building. Three trees are provided at the
caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and shoull
north end of the sidewalk.
be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be
located at least every 25 feet on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
The northern perimeter of the parking lot is
Add another 2'/2" caliper
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas,
short one tree. An overhead electric line
tree to the northern
located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the
limits planting area at the west end.
perimeter of the parking lot.
interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10
parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed
The applicant's parking calculations
Provide a consistent row of
throughout the interior of the parking area.
indicate that 20 parking spaces are required
shrubs along the northern
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should
and 24 are proposed. 3 interior parking lot
perimeter of the parking lot.
measure 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the
trees (serviceberry) are provided, which
ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a
meets the requirement.
Revise the shrub height to
species common to the area. Such trees should be planted
24" minimum at planting.
in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the
Shrubs are not provided consistently along
health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing.
the parking lot perimeters. Shrubs are
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the
proposed at 18 " -30" high.
parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs
should measure 24 inches in height.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as
The proposed species are acceptable for
None.
approved by the Staff based upon but not limited to the
this location.
Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and
Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D).
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the
The note appears on the landscape plan.
None.
landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shat
be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height;
the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall
be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health
of the plant."
Development paftern
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing
The travelways appear organized, but
Revise the plan to provide
natural landscape and should contribute to the creation of
providing two entrances /exits limits
more utility -free space for
an organized development plan. This may be
planting area on the EC side of the
planting along the Seminole
accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the
property.
Lane frontage of the
trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new
property.
trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing
The building is oriented parallel to the EC,
species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that
but the main entrance faces north and the
Revise the plan to add trees
any grading will blend into the surrounding topography
walls facing the EC have no windows,
and shrubs on the EC side
thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the
doors or architectural detailing.
of the rain garden and
extent practical, existing significant river and stream
"depression ".
valleys which may be located on the site and integrating
Most of the wooded slope at the back of
these features into the design of surrounding development;
the site is to remain. No views are expected
Revise the building to
and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that
to be negatively impacted by this
include architectural
does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the
development.
detailing to relieve the
Entrance Corridor.
blankness of the walls
facing the EC.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the
Entrance Corridor street and to other development within
the corridor should be as follows:
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths,
and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor
street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings
should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street.
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent
pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to
provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including
creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock
outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural
features should be reflected in the site layout. If the
provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County
Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by
that section should be located so as to maximize the use of
existing features in screening such improvements from
Entrance Corridor streets.
f. The placement of structures on the site should respect
existing views and vistas on and around the site.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the
A retaining wall is proposed at the back of
Indicate on the plan the
site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of
the parking lot. It is proposed to be
color and size of the block
retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of
constructed of segmental block and would
proposed for the retaining
smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing
reach a maximum height of 10'. A similar
wall. Provide a retaining
terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable.
wall was constructed at the Wilco -Hess
wall detail.
site. Located at the back of the site, the
Proposed contours on the grading plan shall e rounded-7019 rounded-7019
a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent
wall is not expected to have a significant
Provide documentation that
condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than
impact on the EC, if the color and scale of
the work proposed off -site
engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and
the block are appropriate.
is approved by the property
taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blen4
owner.
with the landscape.
A bio- swale, a rain garden and a
"depression" are proposed on site. The
Revise the plan to provide
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be
designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need
"depression" is located mostly in the
more utility -free space for
for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor
Seminole Lane right -of -way, near the
planting on the EC side of
street, these features must be fully integrated into the
center of the Seminole Lane frontage. The
the rain garden and
landscape. They should not have the appearance of
rain garden at the southern end of the
"depression ".
engineered features.
frontage has a grate inlet riser structure.
Each facility partly abuts utilities and
Revise the plan to fully
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new
drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished
easements, which limits space for
integrate the rain garden
site to the extent possible.
landscaping. As currently shown, these
and depression into the
facilities do not appear to be fully
landscape.
integrated into the landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the
Two relatively small areas of existing trees
Provide a conservation
drip line of any trees or other existing features designated
are proposed to be removed for this
checklist on the plan. Show
for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness.
development. The small size of the area
tree protection fencing on
Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and
suggests that the tree removal will not have
the plan.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The appearance of the Seminole Lane frontage planting.
2. The visibility and appearance of the bio- Swale, rain garden and depression.
3. The use of painted brick.
4. The EC- facing walls with no windows, doors or architectural detailing.
5. The tower and its relationship to the entrance.
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee:
Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18- 30.6.4(2), (3) and (5): As per § 32.4.2.2(b)(3) and 30.6.4(c)(3) and EC
Guidelines # 20 and 44, it is not clear that sufficient planting area is available along the Seminole Lane frontage to accommodate landscaping
sufficient to eliminate the engineered appearance of the rain garden and depression and to integrate them fully into the landscape.
Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
Regarding recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
• A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
• Provide sufficient utility free planting area along the Seminole Lane frontage to accommodate landscaping sufficient to eliminate the
engineered appearance of the rain garden and depression and to integrate them fully into the landscape.
Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit:
o As per § 32.4.2.2(b)(3) and 30.6.4(c)(5), provide a conservation checklist and show tree protection fencing on the plan.
coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and
a negative impact on the EC. Individual
erosion and sediment control plans.
trees are not identified.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate
of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and
protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the
site. This protection should remain in place until
completion of the development of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or
movement of heavy equipment within this area.
SIGNS: 7' tall x 8' wide signs are shown on the front and sides of the tower. The signs appear to be panels.
Provide complete sign
Panel signs are not a style recommended by the guidelines. The signs also include a graphic image of flames
details for review.
above a grate. Details on the sign design have not been provided yet for review; however, the applicant should
note that internal illumination is generally considered to contribute to visual clutter and will be limited. Internal
illumination will be evaluated on size, balance, complexity, and distance from the Entrance Corridor. Another
sign of raised letters is proposed across the top of the EC-facing elevation of the southern wing of the building.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The appearance of the Seminole Lane frontage planting.
2. The visibility and appearance of the bio- Swale, rain garden and depression.
3. The use of painted brick.
4. The EC- facing walls with no windows, doors or architectural detailing.
5. The tower and its relationship to the entrance.
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee:
Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18- 30.6.4(2), (3) and (5): As per § 32.4.2.2(b)(3) and 30.6.4(c)(3) and EC
Guidelines # 20 and 44, it is not clear that sufficient planting area is available along the Seminole Lane frontage to accommodate landscaping
sufficient to eliminate the engineered appearance of the rain garden and depression and to integrate them fully into the landscape.
Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
Regarding recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
• A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
• Provide sufficient utility free planting area along the Seminole Lane frontage to accommodate landscaping sufficient to eliminate the
engineered appearance of the rain garden and depression and to integrate them fully into the landscape.
Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit:
o As per § 32.4.2.2(b)(3) and 30.6.4(c)(5), provide a conservation checklist and show tree protection fencing on the plan.
Staff offers the following comments on the preliminary site and architectural design:
1. Revise the wall material to unpainted brick that is coordinated with nearby buildings. Indicate the trellis material and color on the drawings. Provide
material and color samples for review.
2. Show the tower and trellis on the site plan.
3. Revise the architectural design to coordinate the tower and the entrance.
4. Provide details to clarify the appearance of the trellis and canopies.
5. Provide a street elevation showing the form, size and scale of the proposed building with the adjacent buildings.
6. Revise the building to include architectural detailing to relieve the blankness of the walls facing the EC.
7. Provide window glass information on the plan showing that visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40% and visible light reflectance
(VLR) shall not exceed 30 %.
8. Indicate the height of the mechanical equipment proposed behind the building, and adjust the planting height of the screening shrubs to match the
equipment height.
9. Provide a dumpster detail in the plan.
10. Add the standard equipment note to the architectural drawings. "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
eliminated."
11. Provide a complete lighting plan for review.
12. Provide an additional EC tree, at 3'/2" caliper.
13. Provide interspersed ornamental trees distributed along the frontage of the property.
14. Add another 2'/2" caliper tree to the northern perimeter of the parking lot.
15. Provide a consistent row of shrubs along the northern perimeter of the parking lot.
16. Revise the shrub height to 24" minimum at planting.
17. Revise the plan to provide more utility -free space for planting along the Seminole Lane frontage of the property.
18. Revise the plan to add trees and shrubs on the EC side of the rain garden and "depression ".
19. Indicate on the plan the color and size of the block proposed for the retaining wall. Provide a retaining wall detail.
20. Provide documentation that the work proposed off -site is approved by the property owner.
21. Revise the plan to fully integrate the rain garden and depression into the landscape.
22. Provide a conservation checklist on the plan. Show tree protection fencing on the plan.
23. Provide complete sign details for review.
TABLE A This report is based on the followine submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
1
Site Plan Cover Sheet
3 -10 -14
7
Notes & Details
3 -10 -14
2
Existing Conditions
3 -10 -14
8
Site Cross Sections
3 -10 -14
3
Site Plan
3 -10 -14
ARB.01
Architectural Cover Sheet
3 -2 -14
4
Landscaping Plan
3 -10 -14
ARB.02
Context Photos
3 -24 -14
5
Utility & Grading Plan
3 -10 -14
ARB.03
Elevations
3 -24 -14
6
Stormwater Management Plan
3 -10 -14
ARB.04
Elevations
3 -24 -14
10