HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201300137 Review Comments tiliemerie
Service Authilbrity
TO: Johnathan Newberry
FROM: Alexander J. Morrison, Civil Engineer
DATE: October 23, 2013
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: SDP201300054: Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B and
35B - Initial Site Plan
TMP# 055E0-01-00-000A1
The below checked items apply to
this site.
✓ 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for:
✓ A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
✓ 2. A 12 inch water line is located in Golf Drive.
3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is
Gpm + at 20 psi residual.
✓ 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located on site.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed.
✓ 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future
easements.
7. and plans are currently under review.
8. and plans have been received and approved.
9. No plans are required.
✓ 10. Final water and sewer construction plans are required for our review and approval.
11. Final site plan may/may not be signed.
✓ 12. RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections.
13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer.
✓ Comments:
• RWSA flow acceptance will be required during the construction review phase.
• 3 sets of construction plans along with water and sewer data sheets are required.
Submission should be made directly to the ACSA (Attn: Jeremy Lynn).
168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville•VA 22911 •Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax(434) 979-0698
www.serviceauthority.org
'ter. AL N4arre
I � lll IIlI—
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126
October 23, 2013
Nathan Morris
Roudabush, Gale&Associates, Inc.
914 Monticello Road
Charlottesville,VA 22902
RE: SUB201300137 Old Trail Village Blocks 28,29B and 35B—Preliminary Subdivision Plat
Mr. Morris:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary
comments from the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other
agencies, as applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner)
Albemarle County Engineering Services
Albemarle County Information Services(E911)
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Virginia Department of Transportation
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
Albemarle County Service Authority
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed,and should
not be considered final. However,the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
could affect approval of the proposed project.
Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for approval by the Site Review
Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions,please submit in writing justification for
not incorporating such revisions. Submit(8)full size copies to the Department of Community
Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by
Monday,November 4th,2013. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in denial of the
application unless deferral is requested. If deferred,review will resume when revisions are submitted.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
J.T.Newberry
Planner
Planning Services
`fir✓ 'rrr''
Review Comments
Project Name: Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B &35B - Preliminary Plat
Preliminary
Date Completed: Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Reviewer: Johnathan Newberry
Department/Division/Agency: Planning
Reviews
Comments:
1.[Code of Development] Approval of a variation for setbacks in Blocks 28 and 29B.
2.Maintenance agreements will be needed for the private street and alleys.
3.Easement plats will be needed for easements outside of the public right-of-way.
4.On Sheet 1, please remove the note under the column titled "Site Data" that references development rights.
Review Status: Requested Changes
Review Comments
Project Name: Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B & 35B- Preliminary Plat
Preliminary
Date Completed: Monday, October 07, 2013
Reviewer: Max Greene
Department/Division/Agency: Engineering
Reviews
Comments:
All items in 14-303, 14-308, 14-311 will be adequately addressed with the final plat submittal.
'Roads will be built and accepted into the State System or bonded. Please submit road plans for review.
'Water Protections plans will be approved prior to final Plat approval.
Review Status: See Recommendations
Review Comments
Project Name: Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B & 35B - Preliminary Plat
Preliminary
Date Completed: Friday, September 27, 2013
Reviewer: Andrew Slack
Department/Division/Agency: E911
Reviews
Comments:
Before final approval for Old Trail Blocks 28, 29B, & 35B is given the applicant should provide approved road
names for'Private Street A', 'Private Alley A', 'Private Alley B', 'Private Alley C', 'Road L', and 'Road M'. Golf View
Drive and Brookley Drive are both approved road names.
Review Status: Requested Changes
Review Comments
Project Name: Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B &35B - Preliminary Plat
Preliminary
Date Completed: Saturday, October 05, 2013
Reviewer: Robbie Gilmer
Department/Division/Agency: Fire Rescue
Reviews
Comments:
Based on plans dated August 22, 2013
1. Streets less than 36 ft FC/FC shall be marked on one side"No Parking Fire Lane"
Review Status: Requested Changes
'NNW' Nouse
,z S.<
t*
'';,X•04 :+
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper.Virginia 22701-3819
Gregory A.Whirley
Commissioner of Highways
October 22,2013
Mr.Johnathan Newberry
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville,VA 22902
Re: SDP-2013-00054 Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B and 35 B Initial Site Plan
Dear Mr.Newberry:
We have reviewed the Initial Site Plan for Old Trail Village Blocks 28,29B,&35B dated August 22,
2013 as submitted by Roudabush,Gale&Associates,Inc. and offer the following comments:
1. The sight lines shown need to originate at a point that is 14.5'off of the edge of travel as
indicated in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual.
2. The sight easement should be located 5' behind the sight line rather than directly on the sight line.
3. While the entrance to Duplex Lot 10 (Block 29B) is shown on Private Street `A', it would be
better if the entrance were moved to the west,further from the intersection with Road`M'.
4. The return radius at the intersection of Brookley Drive and Road`L' needs to be shown.
5. The sections of roadway that will have CG-6 should be labeled in plan view. Likewise with
Rolltop curb.
6. The sections of roadway that will have parking on one side only should be identified in plan view,
indicating which side will be for parking.
7. It would be preferred to locate the waterline outside of the paved surface.
8. Why is the 20'utility easement on lot 21 near the intersection of Road `M' and Golf Drive being
vacated? Could the waterline be extended from the existing stub out at this location into the new
development?
9. More detail for how the drainage will be handled at the street intersections needs to be provided.
10. The pavement design calculations need to be provided for review.
11. Most of these items can be addressed with the road plans,however,the sight plan should not be
approved until the road plans have been approved.
If you need additional information concerning this project,please feel free to contact me,
Sincerely,
0
Troy Austin,P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Culpeper District VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Review Comments
Project Name: Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B & 35B- Preliminary Plat
Preliminary
Date Completed: Monday, October 21, 2013
Reviewer: Victoria Fort
Department/Division/Agency: RWSA
Reviews
Comments:
Please note that RWSA will need to issue a flow capacity certification to ACSA prior to final site plan approval.
Review Status: See Recommendations
Review Comments
Project Name: Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B & 35B- Preliminary Plat
Preliminary
Date Completed: Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Reviewer: Alexander Morrison
Department/Division/Agency: ACSA
Reviews
Comments:
The Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) has received and reviewed the plan/document/project described
above. All ACSA comments have been addressed by the applicant. The ACSA hereby approves the
plan/document/project described above.
Please feel free to contact me at the number below with any comments or questions you may have.
Thank you.
Note: The ACSA is approving without comments because we do not have approved construction drawings to
match the plat to. Once construction approval is granted the ACSA will comment accordingly on the Final Plat.
Review Status: No Objection
Johnathan Newberry
From: Nathan Morris [NMorris @roudabush.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 6:57 AM
To: Johnathan Newberry
Subject: RE: SDP-2013-00054 Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B and 35B - Initial Site Plan
Okay—Thanks.
Nathan Morris
Roudabush, Gale and Associates
914 Monticello Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Phone: (434) 977-0205
Fax: (434) 296-5220
From:Johnathan Newberry [mailto:inewberrv@albemarle.org]
Sent:Wednesday,October 23, 2013 1:55 AM
To: Nathan Morris
Subject: RE: SDP-2013-00054 Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B and 35B- Initial Site Plan
Nathan,
I still haven't received any comments from ACSA, but I'll forward them as soon as they're received. My comments are
minimal; I just need to get with Megan to confirm the format we're using in this case where the plat and initial plan are
identical.
I'll send them to you as soon as I can.
Thanks,
J.T. Newberry
Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-296-5832, ext. 3270
From: Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:28 AM
To: Nathan Morris
Subject: FW: SDP-2013-00054 Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B and 35B - Initial Site Plan
Nathan,
Here are the VDOT comments that just came in. I'll be putting them all together and sending them this evening.
Sorry for the delay,
J.T.
From: Austin, Nathran. (VDOT) [mailto:Nathran.Austin@ivdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:35 AM
To: Johnathan Newberry
Subject: SDP-2013-00054 Old Trail Village Blocks 28, 29B and 35B -Initial Site Plan
1
Troy Austin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
Land Development—South
Culpeper District
P.O. Box 1017
Troy,VA 22974
Phone: (434) 589-5871
Fax: (434) 589-3967
2
err++
Johnathan Newberry
From: Austin, Nathran. (VDOT) [Nathran.Austin @vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 1:26 PM
To: Johnathan Newberry
Subject: SUB2013-00137 Old Trail Blocks 28, 29B, and 35B Preliminary Plat
J.T.,
This preliminary plat looks to be the exact same submittal as the initial site plan with a different title. Do you need
another letter, or can you use the one I sent earlier this morning? My comments will be the same. Thanks.
Troy Austin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
Land Development—South
Culpeper District
P.O. Box 1017
Troy,VA 22974
Phone: (434)589-5871
Fax: (434) 589-3967
1
o. 6 p
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper,Virginia 22701-3819
Gregory A.Whirley
Commissioner of Highways
October 22,2013
Mr.Johnathan Newberry
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville,VA 22902
Re: SDP-2013-00054 Old Trail Village Blocks 28,29B and 35 B-- Initial Site Plan
Dear Mr.Newberry:
We have reviewed the Initial Site Plan for Old Trail Village Blocks 28,29B,& 35B dated August 22,
2013 as submitted by Roudabush,Gale&Associates,Inc. and offer the following comments:
1. The sight lines shown need to originate at a point that is 14.5' off of the edge of travel as
indicated in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual.
2. The sight easement should be located 5' behind the sight line rather than directly on the sight line.
3. While the entrance to Duplex Lot 10(Block 29B) is shown on Private Street `A', it would be
better if the entrance were moved to the west,further from the intersection with Road
4. The return radius at the intersection of Brookley Drive and Road`L' needs to be shown.
5. The sections of roadway that will have CG-6 should be labeled in plan view. Likewise with
Rolltop curb.
6. The sections of roadway that will have parking on one side only should be identified in plan view,
indicating which side will be for parking.
7. It would be preferred to locate the waterline outside of the paved surface.
8. Why is the 20'utility easement on lot 21 near the intersection of Road`M' and Golf Drive being
vacated? Could the waterline be extended from the existing stub out at this location into the new
development?
9. More detail for how the drainage will be handled at the street intersections needs to be provided.
10. The pavement design calculations need to be provided for review.
11. Most of these items can be addressed with the road plans,however,the sight plan should not be
approved until the road plans have been approved.
If you need additional information concerning this project,please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,�f�f ,
Troy Austin,P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Culpeper District VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Johnathan Newberry
From: Victoria Fort[vfort@rivanna.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 3:41 PM
To: Johnathan Newberry
Cc: Alex Morrison
Subject: SUB2013-00137& SDP201300054 Old Trail Blocks 28, 29B & 35B
Johnathan,
I have not yet seen the site plan or subdivision application, but I noted in the memos dated September 25, 2013 that the
abovementioned applications propose a total of 33 single family detached lots. Please note that RWSA will need to issue
a flow capacity certification to ACSA prior to final site plan approval.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Victoria
Victoria Fort, EIT
Civil Engineer
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville,VA 22902
(P):(434)977-2970 ext.205
(F):(434)295-1146
1