Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-03-20 Budget4~ Call to Order. BUDGET WORK SESSION: Capital Improvements Program. Issues from Prior Work Session. 4:00 P.M. - JOINT MEETING WITH SCHOOL BOARD Call to Order. Work Session: School Budget/Compensation. From the Board and School Board: Matters not Listed on the Agenda. Adjourn. RECEIVED AT BOS MEETING Date: 3 Agenda Item #: Clerk's Initials: WOrk SesSion Capital': Improvements Program March 20, 2002 Increasesgeneral fund transfer ~ to,the capital program and to debt service growth to: the capital fund l~t ~f ~he tax rete to the Ca~tal debt service~ 07-'1 ~1 As~ssment~ ' current 5-year FY 103-07' CIP amendments have been reviewed by the ;Technical~Committae. Schools 57% OtherLocal Z% 15% ACE Stormwater ~% ~.Hiwys & Trads 2% 4% 7% ~, To~be:aMid~cycle Amendme~it~ ithe~PrOposed pi:oiect: Meet~ -- ~ The ~OIIowing~definition of acritical need: otherWise. A specific Federal/State ~mandate: A~pub!ic:policy established by the. BOardof SuPervisors~ ~Or for. SchOol projects, by the County SchOOl Board. And/or the following:other sPeCifiC criteria: Reflects updated cost :~al~ui~tions bas&d On better' iitfOrmationand/or proem clarifie~ition. RefleCtS a change:for an existing approved be lOst; if.it was deferred until: the inext regular revenue projections. r.: ~ - ' - '*~;~ Amended!FY 03~)7CIP $109.2 Mi! Original FY03~OTCIP $103.9 Mil Court) 0307 period. ~ 2. Increased costs by $7.0 4. TowePark Tennis Court ~S. 6cotta-~ille CC based on consultant study 4.Rel~lacement of court surface -Sa~b~ i~sue, netS8,000 =in~r. (Additional) 6; County Animal ~ 6; New Proiect- Addsa tota of $250~000 {$50;000 peryear from Shelter'Construction Fu~d - SPCA contribUtiOn to the Construction 8: County FaCilities - upgrades to the county GIS. Maintenance& ,~ 8, New - $80.000 to Co(~nty Facilities Maintenance in FY 03 RePlacement for renOVation of COB elevat0rs,=and MastetPlan for County FacilitiesM~intenance. Field~$t00~000 in FY 2006. These items ~n ;be r~0nsidered in the FY 04-08 Update ~f the~fbll CIP~ ;~ t; Crozet :KitChen ~ 1~ Add'l $40,000 needed in~FYO3 for CurrentprojeCt. ~ 2: string$~Pmgram ~ 2.~.~g~;.%addscla~ro0ms ~t dbd~U~ H~nley, & ~itOn MSfot strings prog~m~ switc~s ~J;245L000: in ~02 ~nds ~ Sb~rn =Elemen~ co~tr~i~n defe~l t0 pay for Jouett MS ~ 3~ Monti~llo HS additi0n~&~s~ings claSSt~m. Additioa ,~ 3. Proje~cos~ updated. Funds addition design wo~ in ~03, I~V~ cons~u~on in ~ 06 as Shown~in current ~02 CIP until next vea~S~ ~visi6n. Elementar~ 5. School Site Land ~ 5. Moves $25,000 from FY 06 to~FY AcquisitiOn 07~ movers $1~850,000 to out-years 6. :Post,High' House ~ 6.: New:- $250.0~0 in'l=Y 03 fer HoUSe to teach livi0g! skills to post- high school special education students (18-21 year-olds); current: eased space s be ng lost 7. Major Maintenance ~ ~ 7. Adds Sl,200,000 in ~FY 03 and adjus~ costs in FY=04~O6 10r maintenance to address health & safety.issues in schools. MOntiCello HS AuditOHUm ($5;53'1 mill 8tor~ge !Area/Warehouse($O~g8O mill '0Z) WAHS AuditOrium Wall (0.360 mill in ~07) Advancing COnstruction of Monticello HS Addition and Separating Gym from addition. These can be re-considered next year in the:f i ill; FY O4~08 CIP Update. Admin Pabli¢ Safety 12% 4% SchOol Projects - BorrOwed ~*' $; ;8;700, School, -Pay. as-Go* ~ 1.03t General GOvt~ Projects ~, 5.5t9 stsrmwater Projects ~ 0~575 Total Projects e $15.825 rw ;eilteral: Fiind ~-ansfe:r ta~ the CaPital ~i:ii,i ~am and :~ ~::.debti sennce, ;ii, each, i~, ~,:: !i ::~ ;i i~year ~; i~,r byh ii1! I;'i ;B i: ,rrlthe ratel:,, ofil~ ~i ;total revenue groWth Past trend has bee,:~ about a 7% ~annual rgroW~h. For FY 03. in November of:2002. Our estimated groWth Slowd0wn~ and · uncertain effects of aftermath ~September t 1th; ~ OediCate~amounts forCIP ~nd DebtService:were based On these assumptions ~ Impact has been to use:some of tlie: ReServe~ ~ 03'~Capital: Funds ($ in 000) {inc; StormWater) ~ : FY 03 T0tal Need $6~203 ~=~ransfer 5~520 Difference from ReserVe ~683 $5.579 5.520 Other Revenue 239 Total Gert Gev~t Projects 6.094 SchoolS - LOcal 348 Tota I 6.442 Remaining CIP Reserve 4.896 The CapitalReserve is used for'the next 4 years t~ adjUst'fOr. · ~ Change~ in the economy ;iffe~ti~g: revenue growth, · InCreasing debt: service ;costs ever time for capital projects~ . Cushioning annual ~flu~uationS in revenues and~'eroje~ COst~ RECEIVED AT BOS MEETING County General Fund Beginning Board Reserves Less County Executive Adjustments Agency Request - SHE to provide funding increase @ 2.5% MACAA Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program funding FICA for Parks & Recreation Summer P-T employees Commonwealth's Attorney -continuation of full salary for 1 staff Commission on Children & Families Adjust Benefits for Senior Planner (1/2 yr) Clerk's Initials Recurring One-Time 405,597 850,000 941 32,656 20,000 12,000 1,766 1,900 Subtotal -- Subtract Plus County Executive Resource Changes Parks & Recreation Fees (Increase $1 on Entry Fees) 69,263 35,000 Subtotal - Add Less Board of Supervisors' Adjustments 35,000 Subtotal - Subtract Plus Board of Supervisors Resource Changes Increase vehicle decal fee by $3.50 (40% local/60% school) Increase E-911 surcharge by $0.26 to $1.65 (no Fire Dispatch increase) Provide Tourism Funds for ACE/Other 262,500 262,500 159,588 159,588 450,000 450,000 Subto~l- Add Subtract School Share of Vehicle Decal Revenues 872,088 422,088 157,500 450,000 Increase Compensation by 1.3% (to 3.3%) Administration 1.0 FTE Budget Analyst I Judicial 295,000 295,000 54,225 52,975 1,250 Public Safety Adjusted request for Regional Jail operations & operating reserve Adjusted request for BRJDC 1.0 FTE Fire/Rescue Trainer 152,731 52,731 26,370 45,189 45,189 100,000 26,370 HUman Development ~Smmision on Children & Families 18,000 18,000 Parks and Recreation Library 30,000 30,000 FY03 BOS Budget Worksheet 3-20-02xls.xls Page I of 2 Printed 3~20~02 11:19 AM Coun ,ty General Fund Recurring One-Time Community Development 1.0 FTE Senior Planner 65,068 56,658 8,410 ACE (Tourism Fund) 450,000 450,000 ACE (General Fund) 550,000 550,000 School Division Additional Initiatives Funded 1,686,583 550,553 1,136,030 School Division Plus Additional Ongoing Resources - School Division Subtotal 0 Plus Additional One-Time Resources - School Division Subtotal 0 I Total School Board Resources 911,0021 Unfunded School Board Initiatives: FY03 BOS Budget Worksheet 3-20-02.xls.xls Page 2 of 2 Printed 3/20/02 11:19 AM RECBVED AT BOS MEETING County General Fund Beginning Beard Reserves Less County Executive Adjustments Agency Request - SHE to provide funding increase @ 2.5% MACAA Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program funding FICA for Parks & Recreation Summer P-T employees Commonwealth's Attorney-continuation of full salary for 1 staff Commission on Children & Families Adjust Benefits for Senior Planner (1/2 yr) Subtotal - Subtract Clerk's initials:. Recurring One-Time 405,597 850,000 941 32,656 20,000 12,000 1,766 1,900 69,263 Plus County Executive Resource Changes Parks & Recreation Fees (Increase $1 on Entry Fees) Subtotal - Add Less Board of Supervisors' Adjustments Subtotal - Subtract Plus Board of Supervisors Resource Changes Provide Tourism Funds for ACE/Other Subtotal- Add 450,000 450,000 35,000 35,000 450,OO0 450,000 Increase Compensation by 1.3% (to 3.3%) Administration 1.0 FTE Budget Analyst I Judicial 295,000 54,225 295,000 52,975 1,250 Public Safety Adjusted request for Regional Jail operations & operating reserve Adjusted request for BRJDC 1.0 FTE Fire/Rescue Trainer 152,731 26,370 45,189 52,731 45,189 100,000 26,370 Human Development Commision on Children & Families 18,000 18,000 Parks and Recreation Library 30,000 30,000 FY03 BOS Budget Worksheet Costs 3-20-02.xls Page 1 of 2 Printed 3/20/02 8:56 AM Board of Supervisors' FY 2003 Operating Budget County General Fund Recurring One-Time Community Development 1.0 FTE Senior Planner 65,068 56,658 8,410 ACE (Tourism Fund) ACE (General Fund) 450,000 450,000 550,000 550,000 School Division Additional Initiatives Funded 1,686,583 550,553 1,136,030 School Division Plus Additional Ongoing Resources - School Division Subtotal 0 Plus Additional One-Time Resources - School Division Subtotal 0 i Total School Board Resources 911,002J Unfunded School Board Initiatives: FY03 BOS Budget Worksheet Costs 3-20-02.xls Page 2 of 2 Printed 3~20~02 8:54 AM OMB BUDGETANALYST The OMB was established as a re-organization of County resources and as an organizational enhancement to provide staff support services to the County leadership and other officials that were not previously either available or optimally organized. The workload demands assigned to OMB have increased as part of that re-organization, and this additional position request is part of the base minimum level of staffing needed in OMB to fulfill its responsibilities, as envisioned in the rationale for its establishment. In FY 03, the County is scheduled to do a major revision of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Budget. Review of capital project funding needs, estimates, revenues, and bond financing issues will involve considerable staff work and input from OMB. The County will also likely be implementing or planning other new budgeting efforts, such as a Vehicle Maintenance and Replacement Fund. The requested new Budget Analyst II position will · perform complex budget development and fund monitonng analyses for assigned departments and agencies sections of the operating and capital budgets, · assess need for budget resources in alignment with strategic directions, · develop financial forecasts and multi-year budgetary needs, · analyze and forecast requirements for non-General Fund budgets, · oversee performance, outcome, quality and customer service improvement efforts being undertaken by assigned departments; · perform financial condition forecasts, multiple-year budget forecasts, and future budgetary needs planning linked to achieving strategic objectives; and · assist in identifying new and un-tapped revenue sources, including grant funds and borrowing to finance County programs. RECEIVED AT BOS MEETING Date: Agenda Item #: Clerk's Initials: RECEIVED AT B,.i)-',~ MEETING Date: .....--~L-("bJ Agenda Item #:_ FUTURE OF COUNTY FIRE ~{Pi~_~H ~ County/City Fire Services Agreement states that the City will provide "free" dispatch until June 30, 200~L After that date, the County can choose to have dispatch services provided through one of the following methods: 1. the City Fire Department 2. a combination of ECC and City Fire. 3. bythe ECC OPTION 1: CITY CONTINUES TO DISPATCH ALL COUNTY FIRE CALLS Two Cost Components per the Contract' 1. City dispatches County resources to County calls · contract says County and City to negotiate a "reasonable" fee · waiting on City for estimates · have indicated additional dispatcher may be needed 2. City diSpatches City resources to County calls · Formula in contract established based on midpoint of dispatcher/firefighters salary plus benefit costs Cost Estimate: City cost to dispatch County resources to County calls City cost to dispatch City resources to County calls (approx) unknown $34,OOO Alternate Estimates: 60% of nine dispatcher sala~'ies and operating costs $259,500 OPTION 2: ECC AND CITY DISPATCH COUNTY CALLS: ,Two Cost Components: 1. ECC dispatches County resources to County calls · ECC has provided an estimate of $185,000 to add County fire dispatch (5 dispatchers and operating costs) 2. City dispatches City resources to County calls · Formula in contract established based on midpoint of dispatcher/firefighters salary plus benefit costs Cost Estimate: ECC cost to dispatch County resources to County calls City cost to dispatch City resources to County calls $185,000 $ 34,000 $219,000 Option 3:, ECC dispatches all calls for the region - County and City resources dispatched to County and City calls based on established protocols One Cost Component: 1. Approximately 60% of total cost of ECC dispatch · may vary based on actual dispatches for the region · a formula will need to be developed to fairly distribute costs Cost Estimate: 60% of $185,000 for 5 dispatchers and operating costs $111,000 RECEIVED AT BOS Date: ALBEMARLE COJ~N;~I~"m FY 2002/03 OPERATIbI~,~dktI~.G_ET. BUDGET FORM #8 - NEW/EXPANDED PROGRAM DEPARTMENT: Planning & Comm. Development COST CENTER NAME: Planning & Community Development. Division COST CENTER: 81010 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NEED: To implement the Board adopted Neighborhood Model Implementation FUNDING TOTAL INCREASED EXPENDITURES: $262,109 TOTAL INCREASED REVENUES: 0 NET LOCAL TAX FUNDING: $262,109 POSITIONS GRADE: 16 1. Please provide a detailed description of the enhancement requested and how it fits into your department's mission and goals. Be specific as to what is actually being enhanced, who, when, & where. 1) Funding for the third Neighborhood Master Plan to be initiated around March of FY 02/03, which is based on the proposed timing of beginning each new Neighborhood Master Plan 6 months after the previous Plan has been initiated. (The first Master Plan will be initiated in March 2002. The second will begin 6 months later if funded as part of the County's baseline budget as previously requested b ~artment. 3) Capital equipment needed to support Neighborhood Model/Master Plan. This includes one (1) new laptop computer and projector for power point presentations, and six (6) easels. 2. What factors have caused the request for this enhancement in this budget cycle? Please use data (such as workload measures, service levels and growth factors) to support your justification for this request. If applicable, provide a graph to better communicate your data- supported justification of this request. Timely and effective implementation of the Neighborhood Model is this Department's highest priority project and one the County's highest priority efforts. High expectations exist with the Board, Planning Commission, general public, and the development community to implement the recommendations of the model quickly and effectively. The development of the Neighborhood Master Plans is the highest priority initiative. There are 11 designated Development Areas that need to be master planned. These areas are to be covered by a total of seven (7) Neighborhood Master Plans. While starting a new Neighborhood Master Plan every six months is an aggressive schedule, it will take about 5 years to complete all master plans under this schedule. In order to meet this schedule and the scope anticipated for the Master Plans, it will be necessary to use consultant services. Current staff levels and expertise are insufficient to undertake multiple Master Plans of this complexity (See separate attachment, Workload Information). Development of each master plan necessitates management by staff. Therefore, an additional Senior Planner will be necessary to begin work on the second neighborhood master plan while the first master plan is still underway. Also, once each plan is completed, it is anticipated that expectations will increase in each area for continuing planner involvement in the responsive implementation of each master plan and other on-going planning initiatives in each area. The current level of staffing for the Development Area core function is three (3). These three staff are responsible for all Comprehensive Plan Amendments, rezonings, special use permits and other planning projects within the Development Areas, with one Senior Planner (Susan Thomas) having primary responsibility as the neighborhood planner for the Crozet Master Plan. In the current workload environment, this is not sufficient staffing to take on all of the master plan work required to implement the Neighborhood Model (see separate attachment, Workload Information, regarding current and future project demands). Staff estimates that, at a minimum, a total of four (4) neighborhood planners will ultimately be needed to support the development and implementation of all seven (7) master plans. This expanded request also includes some of the equipment needs to support the initiatives described above. This equipment will be needed to by provide presentations and work in the field on master plan development. When multiple plans are under development, it is anticipated that the Department wide demand for the Department's laptop computers will exceed their availability. Also, the Department must now borrow a projector from other departments when available, which becomes inefficient in an increased demand environment~ Breakdown of Task Areas/Personnel in the Planning & Comm. Devel. Division, FY 02-03 The fbllowing is a listing of projects identified in the Comprehensive Plan and Department work program and ongoing assignments~ Adjacent to the listing is the staff person assigned to that project. The "----" indicates projects unassigned, primarily do to staff limitations, timing of the project, or both. Current Planning Site Plans Subdivisions Tower review Subdivision Ordinance Amendments {5 staff assigned) Steve Waller, Margaret Doherty, Karl Guiler Yadira Amarante, Francis McCall, Margaret D~ Steve W., Margaret D. Current Planning team (Yadira/Marg. D, leads) {2 staff assigned } Margaret Maliszewski, Janet Miller Margaret M. Margaret M., Janet M. Janet M. Design Planning ARB Historic Preservation Lighting Ord/policy Landscape plan assist. Historic District Plan: · staff committee Marg. M~ Implement action agenda Marg. M. Historic Site Survey .... Historic Preservation Ord. ---- Development Area (DA) ZMA's Special Use Permits CPA's/"2232" Rev. Text Amend. (ZTA) (3 staff assigned) Elaine Echols, Michael Barnes Elaine, Michael Elaine, Michael Elaine, Michael Pub. Facilities Site Analysis: Southe~ Elem. site selection process * Preddy Creek prop. Study for future use ,, Development of an Official map .... Neigh Model Master Plan: * Crozet Susan Thomas * 2nd Neigh. Master Plan .... (also Rural Planning staff member) PACC Area B Study: · JPA/Fontaine area · Blue Ridge Hospital Comp Plan Rev/Update DA Holding Area Study .... Indust. Area Bldg Study .... Suburban Area Analysis Rural Area (IL~) Special Use Permits CPA's/"2232" Rew Rural Pres. Devel ACSA Juris. Area Rev. ACE Ag/Forestal Districts Rec Facil. Authority Conserv~ Easements Rural Area, Comp Plan (3 Staff assigned + part-time temporary staff person[ACE Coordinator]) Joan McDowell, Scott Clark, Steven Biel Joan, Scott Joan, Scott, Steven Biel Scott Ches Goodall Scott Scott Scott Joan, Scott, Steven B~ Critical Res~ Inventory/Bio- diversity Study Scott Joint Jurisd. Planning of Border Areas Scenic Highways Study Vol. Res. Protection & Ag/For Ind. Support Open Space Plan Update Transportation (Juan Wade) Six Year Primary and Secondary Plans Traffic Model operation Rt. 250 West Committee JAUNT Board Review of Devel. proposals for Trans. issues TEA21 Enhancement Grants Completion, Rt. 250 East Study CHART regional transportation plan, five year update Various other Fiscal Impact (Steve Allshouse) Fiscal Impact Model Annual Update Fiscal impact Model Refinement and Development Fiscal Impact Analysis CIP Various other FY00/01 staff time breakdown (Development Area and Rural Area) This is breakdown of staff time in the two policy area core plamfing groups (Development Area and Rural Area) Joan 40% RA Review 25% SP's/ZTA's 10% supervisory 10% support of committees (ACE, PRFA, Ag/Forestal Comm.) 15% research, meetings, phone/walk-ins Scott S. Biel 30% SP's/RPD's/RA related devel review (farmers' mkt, winery sales SDP's) 30% RA Review 20% Ag/For Districts, PR~A, Bio-diversity 20% research, meetings, phone/walk-ins (all of the assignments Scott has work on are expected to remain with hiru.) 45% SP's/RPD's/RA related devel review (fhrmers' nhkt, winery sales SDP's) 35% RA Review 20% research, meetings, phone/walk-ins (all of the assignments Scott has work on are expected to remain with him.) For your information, noted below are a number of "major" review projects that have a good possibility of being submitted for review over the next 18 months to 2 years (begirming in Jan.,2002) for which staff are not currently assigned, but will be obligated: Golf Course and community proposed for Advance Mills Village LI pu~snoq,i, ~ad To~ From: Date: Subject: Members of the Board of Supervisors and School Board Kimberly L. Suyes, Director of Human Resources March 18, 2001 Joint Board Compensation/Benefits Update In November, the Joint Boards directed staff'to develop the FY2002-03 budget based on a 2.0% salary increase for employees and asked staff'to come back during the budget process with an update based on data from the adopted competitive market. Staffwill be making a presentation to the Joint Boards this Wednesday, March 20, 2002. In preparation for this meeting, staff conducted a survey of the adopted market to gather data on both the projected salary increase and the cost split on medical insurance for next year. Of the 30 localities/organizations in the adopted market, 20 organizations responded to the salary survey and 21 organizations responded to the medical insurance surVey. Enclosed is a copy of the survey data for your information and review. The results of the survey indicate that the jurisdicti6ns in our market are pursuing the following proposed salary increases for next year: · A 3.8% salary increase for teachers based on the median of the market data · A 3.5% salary increase for classified employees based on the median of the market data. The survey also indicated that within our fnarket, the average employer contribution for medical insurance is as follows: ('Albemarle Board.contribution Employee Only 95.5% - no additional for employee + family,) · Employee Only 91.5% · Employee + Family 26.6% beyond contribution for the individual employee In general, it appears that the WorldatWork projections after the events of September 11 were somewhat conservative based on our current projected market data. I look forward to discussing this information with you on Wednesday. In the meantime, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information. I I I I I I I I 0 0 0 0 O0 · o~ o~ O~ o~ o~ o~ o~ o~ O~ o~ o~ o~ o~ c o c ~ ~ o o ~ ~ o c 0 ~ E c 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ o ~ c c = 'E E = ~ c ~ c ~ c o c c ~ ~ 0 0 0 RECEIVE~p~' AT_BOS MEETING Date: Agenda Item #: Clerk's Initials: ~"~c~ ~ _ . Funding Request 2002-2003 I High & Expectations [ WhatG°alSDoes It Take'~'~'~ · Activities don't always mean success. o Effort doesn't always make success. · Money alone doesn't always mean success. · What Works: Goal & Data Driven £eadership - Focused Coordinated Instruction - Dedicated, Motivated, Quali~ Staff Perceatage of Second-Gradem Reading Below Grade Level 25.6 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Year AP: Number of Scores at Each Score Point 20O 177 t68 150 11G 117 114 131 $0 Percentage of Schools Accredited in 2001 · 134 Virginia School Divisions i ESottom25%'jJ ~25%. 2nd25% [j Top25% .] "Teacher effectiveness has a greater influence on student academic growth than any other factor, including class size, ethnicity, location, or poverty." University of Tennessee Study IAustere Budget · State Budget Mess · 9/11 and Fear of Recession · Use of"One Time Money" in 2002 · Other Strains on County Budget · Hunker Down - Plan For Disaster -No New Initiatives. - Level-funding of schools~departments March 20, 2002 · Conditions more favorable since November · Still Austere · Other County Needs ] What Works??? ] · Goal & Data Driven Leadership - Focused Coordinated Instruction · Dedicated, Motivated, Quality Staff Success for Albemarle 'l' County Schools Requires... ~~ to Reward Driven // / ~ ~ ~ High- Leadership / / [ I ~",.performing ~ [ J ",,,,_..... Staff Focused Coordinated Instruction RECEIVED AT BOS MEETING Date: -.-~-- ~ - =,~ ~,~- Agenda Item #: Clerk's Initials: ~'~z'b ~ 3/20/02 Albemarle County Joint Board Update Compensation and Benefits For 2002-2003 March 2002 Joint Board Adopted . and Benefits Compensation . Strategy To Ach~eve..a. nd Maintain Market Pos~t~on · Base Salary · At market levels (i.e., 100th percentile) Benefits · Slightly above market levels (i.e., 105th percentile) 3/20102 3/20/02 Why we need to stay at market Valuing our employees · Ability to Attract, Retain, and Motivate · Externally competitive · Internally equitable · Flexible · Simple to administer and.communicate · Viable classified/administrator performance-based pay IWhere we were Competitive Review CLASSIFIED SCALE CLOSING THE GAP FY~I FY 01J02 Market · Albonmrle J 2 3/20/02 Competitive Review TEACHER'S SCALE IWhere we were Market Salary Survey - July 2001 Market Salary Survey Data 50000 il ~ r-ca r.~ I 4oooo~ _ ~ t~1~1-11~ Sa*ar~ 2oooot~~~1~I1:1~ E E E E E m m E Step lla Market la Nbemade Where we were November 2001 Staff Recommi~ndations · Initially proposed adopting a 4.3% salary increase (based on WorldatWork data) · After Sept. 11th, revised increase to 3.3%for 2002~2003 (based on WorldatWork data) · Adopt 3.0% salary scale adjustment for 2002~2003 · Plan on 16% increase in medical insurance plan 3/20/02 I Where we were Board Budget Direction in No~ember Build the budget based on' · 2.0% salary increase for teachers and classified staff · No increase in medical insurance premiums for employees 3/'20/02 · Directed staff to resurvey the market and advise I Where we are Current Status (March 2002) · Market Forces · Local business forecast · Unemployment levels · Cost of living · Competitiveness of Total Compensation (salary and benefits) 3/20102 8 3/20/02 I Where we are Chamber of Commerce 2002 Local Business Forecast · Local economy is changing · 41% expect employment level to rise · 56.6% expect employment level to hold steady · 57.8% expect increased profits · 73.8% expect rise in operating costs · Source: Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce Economic Survey for 2002 3/20/02 ~* " I Where we are Unemployment Levels 3/20/02 · Charlottesville area still has one of the lowest unemployment levels in Virginia · Change since July · Albemarle + 1.4% in July + 1.9% in December + 2.4% in January · , Charlottesville + 2.3% in July + 2.1% in December + 2.8% in January · Source: Virginia Em ployment Commission lO 3/20/02 Cost of Living Charlottesville has the 2nd highest Cost of Living of the 8 largest urban areas in Virginia I Where we are · Charlottesville is second only to Northern Virginia · Source: American Chamber of Commerce Research Association 3rd Qtr 2001 3/20/02 IWhere we are Competitive Market Survey · 30 localities/organizations surveyed in the Board adopted market · 20 organizations responded to the salary survey 3/20/02 · 2'1 organizations responded to the medical insurance survey 12 6 3/20/02 Where we are Survey Results - Salary Teachers · 4.1% average salary increase · 3.8% median salary increase · Classified · 3.8% average salary increase · 3.5% median salary increase 3/20/02 13 IWhere we are Survey Results - Medical Insurance Albemarle Board contribution rate · Employee Only 95.5% · Employee+Family No add'l · 'Survey of Board contributions for medical insurance (average) · Employee Only 91.5% · Employee+Family Add'l 26.6% 3/20/02 14 7 3/20/02 Where We Are Now vs. Market Teacher Salary Market Data 101.0% ~ nn no/_ 4 nn no/~.~ lOO.O% ............ 99.0% ~ 98.0% 97.0% Now 2% 3.8% Proposed Market Percentage Of Market 3/20/02 15 3/20/02 Where We Are Now vs. Market Classified Salary Market Data 102.0% !00.0°/- 100'0% t 97.5% 96.0% 94.0% Now 2% 6% Proposed Market Percentage Of Market 16 3/20/02 Board Contribution For Medical Insurance I~,,OOO,O00 ILO00,OOO I0,000,000 ~ ~,000,000 3120102 17 3/20102 I Where we are Actions To Achieve Board Strategy To Achieve Market: · 3.8% salary increase for teachers based on median of market (includes step and scale adjustment) · 6.0% merit pool for classified employees based on median of market (adjust the scale) · $3,840 Board contribution per employee to cover full increase in medical costs 18 9 3/20/02 Staff Recommendations · 3.3% to 4.3% salary increase for both teachers and classified (based on WorldatWork data) · $3,840 Board contribution to cover full increase in medical insurance 3/20102 Develop long-term plan to reach market for classified employees 19 Funding Impacts · Each additional 0.1% increase in salary's requires the following additional funding: · School General Fund - $69,000 · General Government Fund - $23,000 3/20/02 20 10 County General Fund Beginning Board Reserves Less County Executive Adjustments Agency Request - SHE to provide funding increase @ 2.5% MACAA Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program funding FICA for Parks & Recreation Summer P-T employees Commonwealth's Attorney-continuation of full salary for 1 staff Commission on Children & Families Adjust Benefits for Senior Planner (1/2 yr) Subtotal -- Subtract Recurring One-Time 405,597 850,000 941 32,656 20,000 12,000 1,766 1,900 69,263 0 Plus County Executive Resource Changes Parks & Recreation Fees (increase $1 on Entry Fees) 35,000 Subtotal - Add 35,000 Less Board of Supervisors' Adjustments Subtotal ~ Subtract Plus Board of Supervisors Resource Changes increaSe E~911 surcharge by $0;36 to $1.75 for Fire Dispatch Provide Tourism Funds for ACE/Other Subtotal- Add 220,968 450,000 220,968 450,000 670,968 220,968 450,000 ear increase Compensation by 1.3% (to 3.3%) Administration 1~0 FTE Budget Analyst ! (Octi I hire) Judicial 295,000 54,225 295,000 39,731 1,250 Public Safety Adjusted request for Regional Jail operations & operating reserve Adjusted request for BRJDC 1 0 FTE Fire/Rescue Trainer (Jan 2003 Hire) 1:0 FTE Police Officer (Jan! 2003 Hire) Fire Dispatch Center Cost (Option 2) Human Development Commision on Children & Families 152,731 52,731 100,000 26,370 26,370 45,189 22,595 72,750 21,375 30,000 219,000 219,000 18,000 18,000 Parks and Recreation Library 30,000 30,000 No RevOption FY03 BOS Budget Worksheet 3-20-02.xls Page 1 of 2 Printed 3/20/02 4:33 PM County General Fund Community Development 1:0 FTE Senior Planner (Jan~ 2003 Hire) ACE (Tourism Fund) ACE (General Fund) School Division Recurring One-Time 65,068 28,329 8,410 450,000 450,000 550,000 550,000 Additional Initiatives Funded 1,978,333 726,761 1,166,030 School Division Plus Additional Ongoing Resources - School Division Subtotal 0 Plus Additional One-Time Resources - School Division Subtotal 0 IT°ta` Sch°°l B°ard Resources 911,0021 Unfunded School Board Initiatives: No RevOption FY03 BOS Budget Worksheet 3-20-02xls Page 2 of 2 Printed 3/20/02 4:33 PM County General Fund Beginning Board Reserves Less County Executive Adjustments Agency Request - SHE to provide funding increase @ 2.5% MACAA Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program funding FICA for Parks & Recreation Summer P-T employees Commonwealth's Attorney-continuation of full salary for 1 staff Commission on Children & Families Adjust Benefits for Senior Planner (1/2 yr) Subtotal -- Subtract Recurring One-Time 405,597 850,000 941 32,656 20,000 12,000 1,766 1,900 69,263 0 Plus County Executive Resource Changes Parks & Recreation Fees (Increase $1 on Entry Fees) Subtotal - Add 35,000 Less Board of Supervisors' Adjustments Subtotal- Subtract 35,000 Plus Board of Supervisors Resour~ce Changes Increase vehicle decal fee by $3.50 (40% local/60% school) Increase E-911 surcharge by $0.26 to $1 65 (no F re D spatch ncrease) Provide Tourism Funds for ACE/Other Subtotal- Add 262,500 262,500 159,588 159,588 450,000 450,000 1,093,056 643,056 450,000 Subtract School Share of Vehicle Decal Revenues 157,500 Increase Compensation by 1.3% (to 3.3%) Administration 1.0 FTE Budget Analyst I Judicial 295,000 295,000 54,225 52,975 1,250 Public Safety Adjusted request for Regional Jail operations & operating reserve Adjusted request for BRJDC 1.0 FTE Fire/Rescue Trainer 152,731 52,731 26,370 45,189 45,189 100,000 26,370 Human Development Commision on Children & Families 18,000 18,000 Parks and Recreation Library 30,000 30,000 Option 2 FY03 BOS Budget Worksheet 3-20-02.×1s Page 1 of 2 Printed 3/20/02 4:35 PM County General Fund Recurring One-Time Community Development 1.0 FTE Senior Planner 65,068 56,658 8,410 ACE (Tourism Fund) ACE (General Fund) 450,000 450,000 550,000 550,000 School Division Additional Initiatives Funded 1,978,333 812,303 1,166,030 School Division ~Avaiiabie S~h~l ~ Rese~e Plus Additional Ongoing Resoumes - School Division Subtotal 0 Plus Additional One-Time Resources - School Division Subtotal 0 l Total School Board Resources 9tl,0021 Unfunded School Board Initiatives: Option 2 FY03 BOS Budget Worksheet 3-20-02.x15 Page 2 of 2 Printed 3/20/02 4:35 PM