HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-11-17
FIN A L
7:00 P.M.
November 17, 1993
Room 7, County Office Building
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Moment of Silence.
Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
Consent Agenda (on next sheet) .
Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 2.1-4, of
Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of
Albemarle, by the addition of a subsection (u) to be known as the
"Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural and Forestal District".
Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 2.1-4, of
Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of
Albemarle, by the addition of a subsection (v) to be known as the
"North Fork Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District".
Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 2.1-4, of
Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of
Albemarle, in subsection (q) known as the "Sugar Hollow Agricultural
and Forestal District".
Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 2.1-4, of
Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of
Albemarle, in subsection (f) known as the "Kinloch Agricultural and
Forestal District".
Request from the Children and Youth Commission for funding of a Teen
Center site on Westfield Road.
Appropriations:
a) Teen Center, $34,535 - (For.m #930036).
b) Haffner Equipment Co., $1,125 - (For.m #930039).
Discussion: Corville Farm Subdivision, central well system, request for
funding.
Interim Report from High School Feasibility Committee.
Work Session: FY 1994/95-1998/99 Capital Improvements Program (continued
from November 3, 1993).
Approval of Minutes: March 16(A), May 13(A), October 7 and November 4,
1992; May 12, July 14 and August 18, 1993.
Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
Adjourn.
7)
8)
9)
1~))
111 )
1~)
1~)
1\:1)
115)
1~)
1~)
CON S E N T
AGENDA
FbR APPROVAL:
5.1 East Rivanna Volunteer Fire Company - Parking Expansion.
5.2 Adopt Performance Bond Resolutions for acceptance of subdivision roads
completed under defaulted bonds into the State Secondary System of
Highways.
5.3 Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission's 1994 Legislative Packet.
5.4 Statement of Expenses from the Department of Finance, Sheriff, Common-
wealth's Attorney, Regional Jail and Clerk, Circuit Court for the month
of October, 1993.
5.4a Adopt Resolution authorizing Circuit Court Clerk to close office on
December 24 and December 27, 1993.
FbR INFORMATION:
5.5 1993 Third Quarter Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning
and Community Development.
5.6 Memorandum dated October 20, 1993, from Forrest D. Kerns, Charlottesville
Housing Foundation, to Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive and David
Benish, Chief of Community Development, re: Crozet Crossing status
report.
5.7 Letter dated October 28, 1993, from Daniel P. Jordan, Executive Director,
Monticello, will Rieley, Rieley & Associates, and Peter Hatch, Director
of Gardens and Grounds, re: notice from VDoT that Monticello was awarded
$1.5 million in ISTEA enhancement monies for construction of first phase
of the Thomas Jefferson Parkway.
5.8 Letter dated October 12, 1993, from Ginnie Decker, President, League of
Women Voters, re: Waste of Energy Report.
5.9 Letter dated November 5, 1993, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, Depart-
ment of Transportation, re: Final Allocation of Funds FY 1993-94; and
Revised Six Year Improvement Program, FY 1993-94 thru 1998-99, for the
Interstate, Primary, Urban and Secondary Highway Systems, Public Tr"ansit,
Ports and Airports.
5 10 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for October 19 and October 26, 1993.
5 11 Letter dated November 9, 1993, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer,
Department of Transportation, to Jo Higgins, County Engineer, re: Mill
Creek Industrial Park, approval of industrial access agreement.
5 12 Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apartments) Bond Program Report
and Monthly Report for October, 1993.
5 13 Abstract of Votes cast in the County of Albemarle, Virginia, at the
November 2, 1993, General and Special Elections.
5 14 1992 Development Activity Report as prepared by the Department of
Planning and Community Development.
5 15 Memorandum dated November 12, 1993, from Forrest D. Kerns, Charlottes-
ville Housing Foundation, to Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive and
David Benish, Chief of Community Development, re: Crozet Crossing status
report.
..
Edward H. B in, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
MEMORANDUM
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning & Community Development
Ella W. Carey, Clerk {:2tX!../
November 18, 1993
Board Actions of November 17, 1993
Following is a list of actions taken by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on November 17,
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
ere were none.
Agenda Item No. 5.1. East Rivanna Volunteer Fire Company - Parking Expansion. Authorized
s ff to facilitate a request from the East Rivanna Volunteer Fire Company for the use of approximately
1 5 acres for expansion of the parking area, whereby the property would be deeded to the County and
I sed to the Fire Company.
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Adopt Performance Bond Resolutions for acceptance of subdivision roads
( ontgomery Lane and Pippin Lane; Mechums West Drive; Springwood Drive) completed under
d faulted bonds into the State Secondary System of Highways. Adopted the attached bond resolutions
hich have been forwarded to Jo Higgins.
Agenda Item No. 5.3. Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission's 1994 Legislative
P cket. Accepted.
Agenda Item No. 5.4a. Adopt Resolution authorizing Circuit Court Clerk to close office on
ecember 24 and December 27, 1993. Adopted the attached resolution which has been forwarded to
Selby Marshall.
(1)
Printed on recycled paper
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
November 18, 1993
Agenda Item No. 5.9. Letter dated November 5, 1993, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner,
epartment of Transportation, re: Final Allocation of Funds FY 1993-94; and Revised Six Year
I provement Program, FY 1993-94 thru 1998-99, for the Interstate, Primary, Urban and Secondary
ighway Systems, Public Transit, Ports and Airports.
Mrs. Humphris suggested that the Canterbury Hills Neighborhood Association be represented
o the Bypass Advisory Committee given the change in the North Grounds connector and the inter-
c ange.
Agenda Item No.6. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 2.1-4, of
hapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle, by the addition of a
s bsection (u) to be known as the "Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural and Forestal District",
dopted the attached Ordinance.
Agenda Item No.7. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 2.1-4, of
hapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle, by the addition of a
s bsection (v) to be known as the "North Fork Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District".
dopted the attached Ordinance.
Agenda Item No.8. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 2.1-4, of
hapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle, in subsection (q) known as
t e "Sugar Hollow Agricultural and Forestal District", Adopted the attached Ordinance.
Agenda Item No.9. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 2.1-4, of
hapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle, in subsection (f) known as
t e "Kinloch Agricultural and Forestal District". Adopted the attached Ordinance.
Agenda Item No. lla. Appropriation: Teen Center, $34,535 - (Form #930036). Approved the
t ansfer of $34,535 from the General Fund to the Teen Center Fund. Original form forwarded to
elvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 10. Request from the Children and Youth Commission for funding of a Teen
enter site on Westfield Road. Requested staff to look at the adequacy of parking at the proposed site.
ppropriated $40,069 from the General Fund Balance to fund a Teen Center site on Westfield Road.
ppropriation form requested from Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. llb. Appropriation: Haffner Equipment Co., $1,125 - (Form #930039).
pproved an appropriation request for $1,125 to complete soil erosion plan at Haffner Equipment site.
riginal form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 12. Discussion: Corville Farm Subdivision, central well system, request for
nding.
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
November 18, 1993
Directed the County Attorney, County Engineer and Mr. Casero to work out an agreement
sting the public purpose that would be served if the Board decided to provide financial assistance to
r. Casero, to set out the proceeds from this system, including the money the County puts into this
a d the rates the customers pay, etc., would be used to maintain and upgrade the system. The agree-
ent should set out the amount Mr. Casero would be entitled to for his services and maintenance of
t e system. The staff is to look at whether this would set a precedent and how could this be
d stinguished from future requests.
Staff to look at the implications of the Albemarle County Service Authority assuming
r sponsibility for the system. Mr. Brent to provide details on what would be entailed and outline the
p os and cons. Bring back as soon as possible.
Agenda Item No. 13. Interim Report from High School Feasibility Committee.
The Board directed the Committee to study areas from a monetary perspective and to deal with
struction. It was suggested that building a new high school be postponed as long as possible by
p tting trailers at existing facilities when the need arises. The Board ruled out the idea of sending
ounty students to City schools.
The Board directed Mr. Tucker to work with Mr. Hendrix on a plan that would allow students
o the three high schools to voluntarily attend the school of their choice.
Agenda Item No. 14. Work Session: FY 1994/95-1998/99 Capital Improvements Program
( ontinued from November 3, 1993).
Public Hearing set for December 15, 1993.
The Board wants to know whether Berkmar Drive North will actually be in place and able to
s rve as a detour during improvements to Route 29 North. Include in the information funding details
a d the impact of moving forward on this project with the Hydraulic Road project.
Mr. Bowerman expressed concerns about a safety issue involving the need for an asphalt path
o Old Brook Road. There are a few strips of old Old Brook Road which are outside the boundaries of
aintree and Fieldbrook Subdivisions where the right-of-way exists for the most part, but not in all
si uations, and where there is a lot of pedestrian traffic. There is no connection between the sidewalks
e cept to walk off the road. There is one location near Rio Road where there is a blind curve and
p destrians have to actually get out of the ditch into the roadway. He asked that consideration be given
t approving what would be a reasonable sum of money to make this one and one-half mile of sidewalk
c ntiguous and connected to Rio Road which would allow pedestrian access without being in the road-
ay. He does not think the homeowners would be absolutely opposed to making some contribution to
d this work.
Agenda Item No. 16. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
Mr. Bowerman announced that he would be out of town from November 20th until November
3 tho
l\. emo To:
I ate:
( age 4)
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
November 18, 1993
Mrs. Humphris read a blurb from the November 1, 1993, VACo newsletter about a new
s ipulation where VDoT states that it has no current or long term responsibility for operation or
n aintenance of stormwater facilities and that counties have to enter into a comprehensive agreement for
s ormwater detention before a new street can be accepted. The article further states this is under
S ction 2.1f VDoT's Subdivision Street Requirements. She asked staff to inform the Board of the
it~plications of this on this county.
Mrs. Humphris asked about the County's hiring procedures for a bonding attorney. Mr,
ltucker informed her that the hiring of a bonding attorney is put out to bid. Mrs. Humphris suggested
t at it may be time to go to bid. She also asked that Mays and Valentine, a legal firm in Richmond, be
p~t on the bid list.
Mr. Bowerman announced that the deadline for applications for vacancies on various Boards
a ~d Commissions is December 8, 1993. The public hearing on nominees to the School Board will be
hl>ld on December 15 with the Board's intent to make appointments on January 5, 1994.
Mr. Marshall announced that he would not be present for the December 1 meeting.
Agenda Item No. 17. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m,
E~C:mms
Attachments (10)
c : Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
George R. St. John
Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
Bruce W oodzell
File
I
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 2.1 , AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS
IN SECTION 2.1-4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that Section 2.1-4
of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle be amended and reenacted
b the addition of a subsection lu} to be known as the "Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural and
F restal District" described as follows:
(u) The district known as the "Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural and Forestal District"
consists of the following described properties: Tax map 13, parcels 1, 4, 8. 10 and
12.
* * + * + *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct of an ordinance
a opted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County. Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
N vember 17, 1993.
~: l' l / "~I
,1 / '
'1.[[(( /U (. CUll' ,
rk. Board of County SU1v;sors
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 2.1. AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS
IN SECTION 2.1-4. DISTRICTS DESCRIBED
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that Section 2.1-4
of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle be amended and reenacted
b) the addition of a subsection (v) to be known as the "North Fork Moorman's River Agricultural and
Fe restal District" described as follows:
(v) The district known as the "North Fork Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal
District" consists of the following described properties: Tax Map 4, parcels 1, 2, 3 and
4.
* . * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct of an ordinance
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
N( vember 17, 1993.
( " . /'/
?:- l( {~ it, '. I cL i:C',1
aefk, Board of County Srervisors
v
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 2.1. AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS
IN SECTION 2.1-4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that Section 2.1-4
of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle be amended and reenacted
in subsection (q) known as the "Sugar Hollow Agricultural and Forestal District" as follows:
(q) The district known as the "Sugar Hollow Agricultural and Forestal District: consists of
the following described properties: Tax map 25, parcels 11 C, 12, 13, 14, 14A, 14C,
18,21, 21A, 24, 25, 27, 28; tax map 26, parcels 5A, 9,108,19, 40B, 40C, 41A,
44, 52, 520; tax map 27, parcels 8, 26; tax map 39, parcels 2, 2A, 3, 4 (part) ; tax
map 40, parcell (part).
* * * ... ... ...
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct of an ordinance
ad ppted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
NolVember 17, 1993.
( ,
7~ Lt{( 1/0" (' (L'V-~~'
6,('k, Boa,d of County suotv;s",s
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 2.1. AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS
IN SECTION 2.1-4. DISTRICTS DESCRIBED
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that Section 2.1-4
o Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle be amended and reenacted
in subsection (f) known as the "Kinloch Agricultural and Forestal District" as follows:
(f) The district known as the "Kinloch Agricultural and Forestal District" consists of the
following described properties: Tax map 65, parcels 7, 7 A, 8, 84A, 86, 89, 90, 91,
91 A. 92, 93, 93A 1, 94. 100. 121, 121 A; tax map 66, parcels 2, 3C, 32, 32D, 34
(Albemarle part only), 34B.
* * * * . .
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct of an ordinance
adppted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
N( vember 17, 1993.
/
(~ . ~
)' 1" II /
( /- i.J ({, /L c. tLH~l
efe'rk, Board of County SU~r visors
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
93/94
NUMBER
930036
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO
x
TEEN CENTER
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
LISMENT OF TEEN CENTER FUND BUDGET FOR FY 93/94.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
1421 71017110000 SALARIES $21,400.00
1421 71017160900 SALARY RESERVE 490.00
1421 71017210000 FICA 1,675.00
1421 71017221000 VRS 1,895.00
1421 71017231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 1,585.00
1421 71017232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 60.00
1421 71017241000 VRS GROUP LIFE INS 190.00
1421 71017270000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 290.00
1421 71017310000 PROF. SERVICES 2,700.00
1421 71017360000 ADVERTISING 750
1421 71017520100 POSTAL SERVICES 400
1421 71017520300 TELEPHONE 150
1421 71017580505 SECURITY SERVICES 400
1421 71017600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 400
1421 71017600200 FOOD SERVICE SUPPLIES 750
1421 71017601300 EDUC. & REC. SUPPLIES 400
1421 71017601700 COPY SUPPLIES 1,000.00
TOTAL
$34,535.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2421 16000160503
2421 16000160503
COUNTY-TRANSFER FROM GEN'L FUND
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
$17,267.50
17,267.50
TOTAL
$34,535.00
**** *******************************************************************
REQU STING COST CENTER:
APPR
PARKS & RECREATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRE
OF FINANCE
~L.:. /f/ ~
~
/.e --..:z.5 - /,3'"
BOAR OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC~L YEAR
93/94
NUMBER
930039
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVE~TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING TO COMPLETE SOIL EROSION PLAN AT HAFFNER EQUIPMENT SITE.
IEXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100041000312371 HAFFNER EQUIP. SOIL EROSION $1,125.00
TOTAL
$1,125.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
2100P19000199900 OTHER RECOVERED COST $1,125.00
TOTAL
$1,125.00
****~*******************************************************************
REQU~STING COST CENTER:
APPROVALS:
ENGINEERING
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRE~TOR OF FINANCE
~~~~
.
/a -;;z..7-9.3
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
/ / ~ I::! - 9,j.
SUBJECT
Parking
AGENDA DATE:
Fire Company - Parking November 17, 1993
l\GENDA T
East Riv
Expansio
ACTION:
ITEM NUMBER:
(v} / J/ 7 (...;;. / )
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: x
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: X
STAFF CO
Messrs.
Ms. Higgins
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGRO
The Eas Volunteer Fire Company has occupied their new facility for about a year.
The 6.0 acre parcel that was deeded jointly to the Fire Company and the County was proffered
with t e rezoning of Glenmore Subdivision. Due to the attendance of Bingo and rental
functio Sf the existing parking has not been adequate. The President of the East Rivanna
Board 0 Directors, Mr. William Craddock, and the Building Committee Chairman, Mr. John Hood
have re ested the use of an additional 1.5 acre (approximately) for expansion of the parking
area.
DISCUSS ON:
Under a separate item (#2) within the rezoning proffer for Glenmore, 27 acres was proffered
for "a ublic school or other public use facilities as the County may select". A portion
of this area could be used for additional parking for the Fire Company until such time as the
need fo a public use facility is determined. Parking would be necessary for whatever use
was det rmined. Due to the layout of the Fire Company, the expanded parking would be
situate on the west side which would maximize the potential for shared parking with a future
facilit or recovering this area to serve the future facility.
est is for the additional parking to be allowed by deed or easement. Since the
transfer from the Glenmore Developer is necessary regardless, it could be done by
the property to the County and leasing it to the Fire Company. The provisions of the
uld address a shared future use or termination of the lease should the future public
need continuous use of the parking.
The re
propert
deeding
lease c
facilit
The Gle
screeni
vicinit
way. In
visuall
appropr
be the
ore proffer did include a provision that the owner may require reasonable visual
gjbuffering of this area. It is important to provide adequate parking in the
of the Fire Company to prevent vehicles from overflowing along the access right of
order to be consistent with the intent of this provision, parked vehicles should be
screened from the entrance to Glenmore. The Fire Company is required to acquire the
ate site plan approval for the expanded parking area. All expenses involved would
esponsibility of the Fire Company and this was acknowledged in their request.
RECOMME ATION:
This is to recommend that the Board authorize staff to facilitate this request for 1.5 acres
(approx mately) to be deeded to the County and leased to the Fire Company as described.
ERFIREC .EXE
93.183
i~~ pJ ~ "I,'..~.H."
. ',1 \ .
-~
~-\
8,
, \ \.
L OR~I
'~'OARD O~UPERV1S .~::J
..-----
~ ,;,/f~"~"-1"-~
..1"'''''/
~? .?'"
t"'.'.'.-' "
~/
.
"'Wr',' "';'~"'.'J .~_,.
: /.~,,' :~ ~" I ~ ........i l' ;'.. l, L :.: "-. , ~ '. ',~
E ST RIVANNA
V LUNTEER
FI E COMPANY, inc.
~.l~~:a': ~:<!>5 :1
r . !\. ',','
n~\';,::, . i:dt
"''1''.""'' :UIYl.. Cfn~
~.,..,J".\....\_. 11,. .
~/
,(;'r, ""f.t
OC;(,)/~ :~
1/~/J//
r- ~J /
<'-IVG~IV, 99,j>
'(ft.:>11
. II,' I'c' ('-'.
.' ,<..,
.... '".
\"(,>
,>/
po ox 157. KESWICK, VA. 22947
Mr. Richard Huff
De uty County Executive
County Office Building
401 MCIntire Road
Cha lottesville, Va 22901-4596
October 8, 1993
Dea Rick;
As We discussed several months ago and again last week, the
Eas Rivanna Fire Company has been considering the need to expand
the public parking facilities at the new station. We have been in
the new facility for about a year and have been watching the
par ing situation during rental functions and bingo. We did not
want to go to the expense of a parking lot expansion until we were
SUre it would be reguired. We are now SUre this is required.
We are now aVeraging OVer 200 people at bingo and the lot will
not old all of th~ cars. Many of the rental functions are also
caus ng a parking overflow.
To expand the lot, We request the Use of an additional 1.5
oximate) acres Which is located immediately to the east and in
line with the existing parking lot. Please see Figure 1. I have
discussed this expansion with the contractor that built the
origi al lot (A. G. Dillard) and there exists no reason why this
area would not be suitable. The additional grading required to
expan the lot is minimal.
would propose a layout as shown in Figure 2. No additional
ces/exits would be required. All expenses involved and all
ed permits would be the responsibility of the East Rivanna
ompany. The finished surfaces of the expansion lot would be
me as the existing lot.
~.
If the County agrees to let us Use the extra land for the
parkin expansion, I think a title transfer or an easement would
work. Probably an easement would be cheapest and simpler.
would appreciate the consideration of the County on this
d expansion. The extra parking will make it much easier to
e large functions we are experiencing and therefore will
allow s to develop income at an increased rate.
jM.~ ~~~~
BUildin Committee President, East Rivanna Board of
Chairma Directors
.
o
LL
(9
z
S2
0:
<(
a...
z
o
i=
~
CJ)
w
a:
u.
(9
Z
I-
CJ)
~
(9
z
~
a:
<(
a...
o
.-I
[])
::>
a...
......
OZ
wOC)
(I)(j)z
Oz_
a...<(~
On.. a:
a:x<(
a...Wa...
~,
w
z
~
a:
w
~
<(
W
I-
CJ)
)
..--
W
0:
:J
(9
LL
.,
.-'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
401 MCiNTIRE: ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE:. VIRGINIA 22901-4596
M E M 0 RAN DUM
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
and Community Deve.~opmentJ
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk ~
[(\1 :-;;,:;. --~ '-', ro-
t.~./ ! [;;;~ (t;: i ft..'? I f\ t;?)'~lm
) (;'\',\..:.5:) \:,;:}~~~';J~ 0/ ,t~ ;
";';':\..-J "-<l:~\ .
fi
DEe 1. 0 1990 \\<x"
TO
December 10, 1990
t); ~.r..r\JJ.;'" ~
. .-rl',: <1:'lG Di\!lSIOf\f
Board Actions of December 5, 1990
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on December 5, 1990, the following
action was taken:
Agenda Item No. 16. ZHA-<)0-19. Frank Kessler. Public hearing on a
r quest to rezone 1195.02 acre from Rural Areas to Planned Residential Develop-
m nt (proffered). ~roperty bordered by Rt 250 on the north and by the Rivanna
ROver on the south and west. Tax Map 79D, Section 3, Parcels 6 & 7; Tax Map 93,
P rcels 59 & 60; Tax Map 94, Parcels 2 & 11. Rivanna District. APPROVfill
Z -90-19 as proffered in Attachments 1 - 7 (all as set out below) entitled:
., roffer for Ta~ Map 93, Parcels 59 and 60; Tax Map 79D, Section 3, Parcels 6
a d 7; and, Tax Map 94, Parcels 2 and 11, in Connection with Petition to Rezone
t Planned Residential Development (PRD) \"ith Private Roads", dated November 8,
1 90, by Frank A. Kessler, Applicant and Owner, together with modifications and
r commendations for private roads.
PROFFER FOR TAX HAP 93, PARCELS 59 AND 60,
TAX MAP 79D, PARCEl.S 6 AND 7, SECTION 3, AND TAX MAP
911 , PARCELS 2 AND 11 IN CONNECTION WITH
PETITION TO REZONE TO PLANNEJJ RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT CPRD) WITII PI~IVATE ROADS
Applicant, as the owner of Tax Map 93, Parcels 59 and 60, Tax Map 79D,
arcels 6 and 7, Section 3, and Tax Map 94, Parcels 2 and 11, collectively
1e.reinafter sometimes called the "Property", hereby proffers:
1. The development of the Property will be limited to those uses allowed
y right under Section 19.3,1 (1), (5), (6), 0), (8), (9) and (10) of the
oning Ordinance of Albemarle County, Virginia, with a residential development
at to exceed 750 single family units together with a site for a school, and a
ite fora fire house, either of which sites may be used for other public use
~..-
,'" ~
, -
'::-'" ..;........
'f':,~
$'" ,r""-' ,
,.",. /'"
"",.
['lemo
Date
IJage 2
.
'-'
To; V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 10, 1990
faci ities, and development of a private country club and recreational facili-
ties including but not limited to tennis, swin~ing, a golf course with related
club house, and an equestrian center. To be excluded from use by right or
spec~al permit under the Zoning Ordinance of Albemarle County, Virginia, are
Sect'on 19.3.1 e?) and (3); and Section 19.3.2 (1), (3), (5), (6) and (7).
Albe
for
parc
made
way,
acres.
way,
aCres
~ssua
occur
Count
eithe
new s
costs
conde
of th
Progr
mally
an an
used
reque
the n
2. Upon the request of Albemarle County, Virginia, to donate by gift to
arle County or its designee, subject to items of record affecting title,
public school or other public use facilities as the County may s~lect a
1 of approximately 27.0 acres as shown on the Application Plan for Glerunore
by Clower Associates, Inc., together with an appropriate access right of
rovided owner may require reasonable visual screening/buffering of the 27
""'--..--.
~ "-
, /-)
'-'
, . .
, ....','
Y-'./
../"
Upon the request of Albemarle County, Virginia, to donate by gift to
rle County or its designee, subject to items of record affecting title,
fire department or other public use facilities as the County may select a
of approximately 6.0 acres as shown on the Application Plan for Glenmore
y Clower A~sociates, Inc" together with an appropriate access right of
rovided owner may require reasonable visual screening/buffering of the six
" /
~.
At the time of closing of the sale of each residential lot or the
ce of a certificate of OCcupancy for each residential lot, whichever first
, to contribute $1000.00 to an escrow fund to be established by Albemarle
for (1) a school capital improvement fund for use by Albemarle County to
expand the capacity of Stone Robinson Elementary School or to construct a
hool on the site described in paragraph 2 of this proffer, or (2) the
including any awards to the owner of the mineral rights, associated with
nation of mineral rights for the property described in paragraphs 2 and 3
s proffer, or (3) other items in the Albemarle County Capital Improvement
m (C.1.P.) related to this project (Glenmore) or to other items not nor-
included in C. 1. P. directly related to this proj ect (Glenmorc),
shall be held by the County in an interest bearing account with
ual accounting to the owner, All interest earned on the account shall be
nly for the same purposes as the original $1000.00 contribution. It is
ted that Frank A. Kessler or his family be consulted in connection with
ling of any facilities for which thesc funds are used.
5. To provide water and sewer collection, distribution and ereatment
facilities at his expense for the ~esidential lots in Glenmore and private
countr club and to dedicate such facilities to the Albemarle County Service
Authority and/or the Rivanna Service Authority. These facilities arc to be
built t no cost to the taxpayers of Albcmarle County or to the customers of th~:':
Albema Ie County Service Authority.
To reserve along the boundary of the Property adjacent to the Rivanna
River 100 foot wide green belt. No buildings shall be constructed, or erected
within the green belt without the consent of Albemarle County and it shall be
..
.~
Memo To: V. Wayne Cilimberg
Date: December 10, 1990
Page 3
pres rved in its natural state except for building of pedestrian and ridi~g
trai s and general beautification includinG but not limited to the cleariGg of
unde"brush, removal of dead trees and shrubs, and cleanup of the river. The
owne may grant across the green belt utility easements, access easements to the
Riva na River for the residents oi Glenmore and members and guests of the pri-
vate country club, and may build riding trails or make other similar uses of the
area.
At such time as the County of Albemarle decides to establish along the
na River a public area or park, the 100 foot wide green belt area, upon
st of Albemarle County, will be conveyed by gift and dedicated to the
Coun-y, provided the uses allowed for utilities, accesses to the river, and
ridilg trails, etc. are reserved in the deed of gift and provided further that
the reen belt area will continue to be counted as open space for purposes of
the lenmore Master Plan and required density. The green belt may continue to
be m intained by the owner of the property, however in the absence of such
main enance Albemarle County at its option may maintain the 100 foot wide green
belt
Asso
stan
A as
7. (a) Road A as shown on the Application Plan of Glenmore made by Clower
iates, Inc. shall be built at time of residential lot development to VDOT
ards and placed in the State Secondary System from U.S. Route 2S0E to Point
shown on the aforesaid Application Plan of Glenmore.
righ
(60)
Plan
the
Glen
(b) Upon request of Albemarle County, Virginia, to dedicate as a
-of-way for public road purposes (i) a strip of land not to exceed sixty
feet in width from Point A to Point B as shown on the aforesaid Application
of Glenmore and (ii) an e.xisting strip of land of variable width owned by
from Point B to Point C as shown on the aforesaid Application Plan of
(c) To construct a road to VDOT standards from Point C extending
through the northeastern portion of the development in a location and with a
ter ination point to be determined by the owner. It is intended that this
roadway shall provide access to properties northeast of Glenmore in at least one
location, To dedicate at such time as owner may select or upon request of
Albe ~rle County, Virginia, whichever first occurs, the road described in this
paragraph, 7(c), together with a right-oi-way, including the built road, not to
exceed 60 feet in width.
8, (a) To construct within the existing right-of-way of U.S. Route 250E
and if necessary partially on the property currently owned by owner an ultimate
entrance to serve Glenmore, This shall be constructed at the time of initial
residential lot development in Glenmore or at a later date if approved by VDOT.
(b) To install upon the request of VDOT on U.S. Route 250E at the
entrance to Glenmore a traffic signal, provided the request from VDOT is made
prior to completion of Glenmore which for purposes of this paragraph shal:. be
dee ed to be the day the last residential lot is sold to a third party purchaser
or 15 years from date of final approval of the Zoning 1-1ap l\mendment, whichever
first occurs.
/'
,v/ .
,I;,)
_J
/~
,/'
/
//
M mo To: V. Wayne Cilimberg
Dte: December la, 1990
Page 4
(c) Providing the ~ork is completed ~ithin 15 years from date of final
roval of this Zoning Map Amendment, to contribute upon completion (i) a
-rata contribution of the cost of construction (as hereinafter defined) to
r-lane U.S. Route 250E from the Glenmore entrance to Route 22, or (ii)
0,000.00, ~hichever sum is less.
A traffic count on U.S. Route 250E shall be made by VDOT immediately to
the east of the intersection of U.S. Route 2S0E and Route 22 ~ithin a reasonable
ti e prior to construction ~ith the pro-rata contribution of the o~ner deter-
mined by a formula ~hich includes a fraction the numerator of ~hich is the
traffic count on U.S. Route 250E bet~een the Glenmore entrance and Route 22
attributable to residences in Glenmore and to the country club facility in
Glenmore (Glenmore Traffic) and the denominator of ~hich is the total traffic
count on U.S. Route 2S0E bet~een the Glenmore entrance and Route 22 (Total
Traffic) as follo~s:
Glenmore Traffic
Total Traffic X Construction Cost
Pro-Rata Contribution
(9) In the event that there shall not have been substantial performance of
pr ffers contained in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5 ~ithin ten (10) years from the
date of final approval of this Zoning Map Amendment, then the undersigned appli-
calt agrees to ~aive his rights under Virginia Code Section lS.1-491(al). Sub-
stantial performance shall include (1) donation of the land described in para-
graphs 2 and 3 of this proffer, if requested Qy Albemarle County, (2) payment of
a least $150,000.00 in cash pursuant to paragraph 4 of this proffer, and (3)
c nstruction and dedication to the appropriate authorities of the public ~ater
al d se~er facilities pursuant to paragraph 5 of this proffer.
(10) Development shall be in general accord ~ith the Application Plan and
G enmore Rezoning Application including textual program of development as de-
s ribed in Exhibit B to the petition, Final development plans shall incorporate
a 1 comments and recommendations of the SHC of October 11, 1990.
*s
(11) All private roads shall be constructed to VDOT mountainous terrain
andards, ho~ever, clearing of private road easements shall be restricted to
m tters of safety as identified by the County Engineer in the final revie~
p ocess. Road maintenance fees shall be in accord ~ith VDOT subdivision streets
m intenance fees (as amended from time to time) and provisions satisfactory to
t 12 County Attorney shall be made for continuous collection and expenditure of
s ch fees, At least one deputized security officer (special police officer)
s all be employed for security purposes.
.(12) These proffers are substituted 1n place of proffers dated September
2 , 1990.
Signed by F. A, Kessler on 8th day of November, 1990.
~.~ ~\ ~':. ;', ;',
Modifications pursuant to Section 8.5.4(d) of the Zoning Ordinance and
l' ferenced private roads as follows;
".r'O
,...,.....
'4.)
~
Private roads are authorized under the SUbdivision Ordinance
provision of S18-36(c) and [due to density comparable to RA,
Rural Area zoning] S18-36(b) subject to proffer 11.
Lotting configuration as proposed by Glenmore rezoning
application: Approval of modification of 84.11.3 of the
Zoning Ordinance as proposed in Exhibit B subject to Fire
Official approval as outlined in Site Review Committee
comments of October 11, 1990.
;~,.
~'" '
<:~-7"
.../
y'.
-'
.Q
.~
AMENDMENT TO RE-ZONING PETITION AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT
APPLICATIONS DATED 9/20/90 CONCERNING 1) TM 790(3)6,
2) TM 790(3)7, 3) TM 93-59, 4) TM 93-60, 5) TM 94-2 and
6) TM 94-11
applications 53.64 acres as shown on the attached plat of
1. There is withdrawn from the ZOnlng petition and special
dabush, Gale & Assoc., Inc. dated October 29, 1990 entitled
mposit Plat of 2 Tracts of Land Containing a Total of 53.64
Ac ~ A Portion of Parcel 59 T.M. 93 Glenmore Near Shadwell
Al emarle County, Virginia".
2. The request for a special use permit to allow a fire
or inance is withdrawn.
an rescue squad station under Section 19.3.2(2) of the zoning
3. Adjoining tracts of property for the mailing of notice
as shown in Exhibit H with the original petition is amended to
include:
ovember 2, 1990
Date
Monticello Slate Corporation
c/o Lesueur-Richmond Slate Corp.
P . O. . Box 8
Arvona, Virginia 23004
Tax Map 93-59A (mineral rights)
Respec~llY submitted,
( //
~;:/. - /:/
'" ./}. ./ /7 /
'--,:._- /' - - /./ /'. ",<._./ Y
/' .-/ /:/ ,..;' ".::- /;. . J,.. /~.
/ ,./ L/.. ..- /-.--' 'v-- ~.' ". ;'''.' _ .., /. ~~
,'. "'~.,~;'''' (.,.-,....,;.;.... ,_.-
,
Frank A. Kesslyr, Owner
Charlotte Y. umphns
Jack Jouet
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902.4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Jo Higgins, County Engineer
Department of Engineering
Ella W. Carey, Clerk e2uV'
November 18, 1993
Performance Bond Resolutions
At its meeting on November 17, 1993, the Board of Super-
isors adopted the attached performance bond resolutions for
cceptance of the following subdivision roads completed under
efaulted bonds into the State Secondary System of Highways:
Montgomery Lane and Pippin Lane
Mechums West Drive
Springwood Drive
ttachments (3)
Richard E. Huff, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scollsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
~ounty, Virginia, that the Board of Supervisors hereby guarantees
o the Virginia Department of Transportation, for a period of one
ear from the date of acceptance into the Secondary System of
Tighways, Montgomery Lane and Pippin Lane against defective
r~aterials and/or workmanship up to a maximum of $7,500.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing
is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the
Eoard of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular
rreeting held on November 17, 19~. :'1' J.
/ f.J {{ & L/ {{U~utl
C . rk, Board of cou~J Supervisors
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
ounty, Virginia, that the Board of Supervisors hereby guarantees
o the Virginia Department of Transportation, for a period of one
ear from the date of acceptance into the Secondary System of
ighways, Springwood Drive against defective materials and/or
orkmanship up to a maximum of $7,500.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing
s a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the
oard of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular
eeting held on November 17, 1993.,
( '1
Y'lt 1/11
(p tL<< l/V l Ct/U-~'tg
Clerk, Board of countyoupervisors
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that the Board of Supervisors hereby guarantees
to the Virginia Department of Transportation, for a period of one
1 ear from the date of acceptance into the Secondary System of
1- ighways, Mechums West Drive against defective materials and/or
vorkmanship up to a maximum of $7,500.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing
is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the
Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular
rreeting held on November 17, 19t,93.:. 1, . / .~.]. , . '.
r, L[ 0. t V C tULt-cj
C 'rk, Board of co~ty Supervisors
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
// - /,,2 ~:--3
AGENDA T TLE:
Performance Bond Resolutions for defaulted
subdivis on road bond projects.
AGENDA DATE:
November 17, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
Cl.:J. / //7 ~<,:,~)
INFORMATION:
ACTION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REOUEST:
To pass ~esolutions for performance bonds for
the acceptance of subdivision roads completed
under deFaulted bonds.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:~
INFORMATION:
:::::: ~
STAFF CO t.tTACT (S \ :
Messrs. ~ucker, Huff & Ms. Higgins
BACKGRO mm:
Over th~ course of the past year the County has performed work on the complet.ion of roads
serving Langford and Mechums West subdivisions. Although Springwood Drive has not yet been
complet~d, the bond has been called. The work has been or will be performed largely with
default~d bond funds. Since all of these roads will be public, performance bonds must be
secured for a period of one year from the date of acceptance by the Virginia Department of
Transpo tation. In lieu of surety, VDOT will accept a 80S resolution for each of the
project .
DISCUSS ON:
The pur pose of a performance bond is to ensure the adequate performance of a :t:oad during a
one yea
agencie
respons
amount
road) i
amounts
period following VDOT acceptance. While bonds could be purchased from insurance
, there would be no point in doing this since the County would nevertheless be held
ble to provide funds in the event of any repairs. The required performance bond
or Langford subdivision (two roads) is $7,500.00; for Mechums West subdivision (one
is $7,500.00; and for Springwood subdivision (one road) it is $3,750.00. These
are based upon the road lengths in accordance with VDOT requirements.
RECOMMEI mATION:
It is recommended that the resolutions be adopted in order to conclude the acceptance of the
roads b VDOT.
PERFBONI .EXE
93.181
--",
.~~.~.r'
\ \ " ,
-, , ~-.-:_",'-"
..~o ~~IS~RS\
v~
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
unty, Virginia, that the Board of Supervisors hereby
arantees, for a period of one year from the date of acceptance
to the Secondary System of Highways, Montgomery Lane and Pippin
ne against defective materials and/or workmanship up to a
ximum of $7,500.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify...
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Cpunty, Virginia, that the Board of Supervisors hereby
guarantees, for a period of one year from the date of acceptance
ihto the Secondary System of Highways, Mechums West Drive against
d~fective materials and/or workmanship up to a maximum of $7,500.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify...
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Cpunty, Virginia, that the Board of Supervisors hereby
gUarantees, for a period of one year from the date of acceptance
into the Secondary System of Highways, Springwood Drive against
d~fective materials and/or workmanship up to a maximum of $7,500.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify...
.
/;- /~~?.. '/3-
:J:-}, / / /7 (s. 3)
COUNTY O;,~~:EMARLE iUJ.n,.~ (n "-.,n ~.1.
~,..--.:J,",.,.~ 11111.;:., .:. .~.\ \~V92. t
() ~I 1 . , 'II. 4\ .{
~ - ~ '" , .i; ~ I "'"
..)..,'1, ';.J ~
" .'-..... ,
, !/((;\ ~\~ t
! nOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
of supervisors. 47-----
County Executive~~{
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
November 11, 1993
RE: TJPDC 1994 Legislative Package
tached is the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission's
94 Legislative Package. Staff review of this program indicates
at there are no substitutive differences between TJPDC's
gislative package and the County of Albemarle's legislative
ogram. We are, therefore, recommending that you approve their
gislative program under your consent agenda.
S ould you have any questions concerning this item, please do not
h sitate to contact Roxanne White or me.
T,Jr/dbm
.214
tachment
~~.~tD~
17 1-1~ ~~ ~ ~j,1.z
(~-) 1/~A:<101-52f3
~ Wi/ 'Jf,l-)1-zo
/I . ./
(v~/
~
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Bonnie Fronfelter, Legislative Liaison
1994 Legislative Program
November 11, 1993
is the proposed draft of the 1994 Legislative Program.
ny new items or substantive rewordings are in italics. The
rogram was reviewed by PDC Commissioners at their November 4th
eeting. I will be attending your November 17th meeting to present
he program and accept any changes you would like to make. Please
ote the addendum to the draft which includes changes made to the
raft by member localities since November 4th. I look forward to
eeting each of you.
'<f.
~~:~_: "/;.: II
:
"j\f 1. l 1993
f.-
,.,'
y(~ l~J Ck/~, Jkv'MUtt4. (~j, i~(~. z~rt~, JVaMiJ~~
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Le . lative Program
Page 1
~.'R~f1
PRIORITIES
The Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission and the member governing
boards are considering this 1994 Legislative Package. The top priorities are:
1. We oppose any change in the funding formula for roads that would
result in a reduction of money for this region.
2. We oppose efforts, mislabled as private property protection laws, which
seek to weaken local powers to regulate land uses and protect the
community's health, safety and welfare.
3. The State should, to the extent possible, fund all new mandates and
establish a review of current mandates. Whenever possible, localities
should be given flexibility in the manner in which they meet these
mandates.
TJPDC, 13 E, Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie ronfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
,,/
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Legislative Program
Page 2
GROWfH MANAGEMENT
POLICY STATEMENT
The Planning District and member governments recognize the imporlance of a mix of
vibrant growing cities and preseIVation of noal areas. In order to maintain this balance, we
supporl expanded autJwrity through enabling legislation to give local governments the tools
to manage growth. We suppOrllegislation which would encourage localities to work together
on a regional basis. We oppose legislation which would restrict existing autJwrity.
/
RECOMMENDATIONS
):( Support enabling leglislation for local governments to use expanded growth
management tools such as Transfer Development Rights (TDR's),
Purchase Development Rights (PDR's), impact fees and adequate public
facilities ordinances.
):( Oppose any legislation which would restrict local governments' ability to
develop, modify, and enforce their comprehensive plan.
):( Support efforts which require state agencies to consider local
comprehensive plans and the future impact of their decisions on the local
community in the agency's decision-making process.
):( Support incentives for regional cooperation where the effects of decisions
are felt beyond the local level.
):( Support streamlining approval processes for development scheduled for
designated growth areas.
):( Support permanent funding of the Conservation and Recreation Fund.
):( Support shared data use development, and Geographic Information System
(GIS) technology through a statewide network of PDC's, local and state
agencies with appropriate funding for regional and local analysis, growth
management planning and dissemination of land use, demographic and
economic data. Also supporl the establishment of a state office responsible for
coordinating state, local and regional GIS efforls.
):( Support efforts to strengthen the "standing" laws to allow citizens and
municipalities to take action against State agencies when decisions
involving air and water quality adversely affect them. Provide opportunity
for lo~al governments or affected citizens to initiate rule making in state
agenCIes.
TJPDC, 413 E, Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie ronfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Legislative Pro am
Page 3
rx Support and fund development of regional water conservation and resource
plans.
rx Support the Population and Growth Commission legislation to establish a
state office of planning.
rx Support a budget amendment for the study of regional environmental
assessment programs..
rx Oppose legislation providing vested property rights in rezonings. (Albemarle)
rx Support legislation authorizing local governments to establish reasonable
procedures and time limits for the amortization of non-conforming signs.
(Albemarle)
x:x Support adding Albemarle County to current legislation that allows certain
counties with local aglforestal districts to follow withdrawal procedures
requiring Board of Supervisors' approval.
FINANCES
POLICY STATEMENT
The Planning District and its members recognize that financing government projects should
be a partnership between the state and localities. But we are alarmed at the decreasing level
of support from the state, while demands for services increase. Wzth oW' limited ability to
raise funds, we are unable to meet services required by oW'residents and those mandated by
the state.
RECOMMENDATIONS
rx Support fully funding state aid to public libraries.
rx Fund state mandates, starting with solid waste management and education.
rx Provide equal taxing and borrowing power for counties similar to that of
cities through food and beverage tax, transient occupancy tax (including
condominiums)and admissions tax (Nelson).
rx Provide local governments with funds and/or taxing power for their
infrastructure.
rx Oppose any efforts to restrict the use of current local revenue sources.
rx Expand local authority to generate additional revenue resources.
TJPDC, 413 E. Market St,. Ste. 102
Bonnie ronfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Legislative Program
Page 4
a Continue state support of human service programs.
a Provide enabling legislation to allow for the increase of the roll back period
for land use tax from five to ten years.
a Provide for local taxing of computers and other personal property used for
administrative and research purposes in a manufacturing business.
a Return a portion of the state lottery funds to localities for infrastructure
needs.
a Oppose any change in the 599 funding formula which would result in a loss
of money to localities with police departments.
a Oppose abolishment of the BPOL tax.
a Support enabling legislation to levy utility tax on cellular phones.
a Oppose any change in the definition of manufacturing if it results in a loss of
funds in local tax collections.
a Oppose any legislation to increase the local share of funding for constitutional
officers. (Albemarle)
a Support legislation to provide for local flexibility of real estate tax collection to
prevent long term home owners from being priced out of their primary homes
due to rapid inflation. Such measures might include homestead exemption,
circuit breaker, refund of excessive tax based on sliding scale and classification
allowing different rates for different values of property. (Albemarle)
a Support allowing local governments to determine minimum acreage
requirements for land use value assessments for agricultural, horticultural,
forestal or open space real estate. (Albemarle)
a Support raising the ceiling on fees collected for courthouse construction,
renovation and maintenance from $2 to $6 to assist local governments in
providingfacilities and equipment for the new family courts. (Albemarle)
a Support closing the loopholes on sales tax exemptions and a speedier
review of already granted sales tax exemptions.
TJPDC, 1413 E. Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie bronfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Legislative Program
Page 5
EDUCATION
POllCY STATEMENT
The Planning District and its members share the state s interest in educational excellence.
Yet local resources for funding education are limited and shrinking. Adequate state funding
and equity needs to be acheived for education in a way that does not diminish present
funding levels.
RECOMMENDATIONS
xx Restore and increase state funding for standards of quality and all other
categorical education mandates without reduction to other components of
the state budget.
xx Provide localities with funds and/or revenue sources for school construction
and equipment, and ensure literary funds are used solely for local school
construction and equipment.
xx Oppose binding arbitration in grievance procedures for school board
employees mandates.
xx Limit additional educational mandates.
xx Allow local governments to appeal to the Department of Education for
additional monies if they feel funding formula changes do not accurately
reflect the true wealth of the locality.
xx Support efforts to allow localities to use state-approved standardized site
plans and specifications for new school construction.
xx Support a change in the cu"ent calculation of the composite index for basic
school aid that recognizes counties that use the land use value assessment
program. (Albemarle)
TJPDC, 413 E. Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie Pronfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
Pa e6
WASTE MANAGEMENT
POllCY STATEMENT
The Planning District and its member localities recognize the imporlance of reducing solid
waste through an integrated management program that stresses source reduction, reuse and
recycling. But the reality of implementing a program and meeting state mandates on landfills
is costly. Therefore, the state must do its share to help localities meet these mandates.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Xl Have state assume lead role in the development of markets for recyclables,
increased source reduction and reuse of materials.
Xl Fund state mandated laws and regulations regarding solid waste,
particularly the upgrading of landfills to standards.
Xl Prohibit the use of nonbiodegradable containers whenever safe, degradable
alternatives are available.
Xl Support measures recommended by the Study Commission on State
Incentives to Encourage the Development of Markets including
procurement policies, tax incentives and technical assistance.
Xl Fund the Solid Waste Revolving Fund which would give grants and other
financial incentives for regional waste mangement solutions.
Xl Require state agencies and institutions to contribute their recyclables to the
local and regional waste stream.
Xl Expand authority granted to James City County to control the flow of solid
waste to all interested localities.
Xl Oppose new mandate requiring full-cost accounting unless the state funds it
or unless it is voluntary and tied to grant money from the state.
Xl Support enabling legislation to allow Counties to criminally prosecute
property owners for permitting the accumulation of trash on their property.
Xl Supporl cost effective container deposit/packaging legislation. (Albemarle)
Xl Supporl state institution of incentives to encourage source reduction.
(Albemarle)
Xl Supporl financial incentives to work regionally on waste management'
solutions. (Albemarle)
, .
TJPDC, 13 E, Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie ronfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Legislative Program
Page 7
0: Support legislative study on impacts of federal and state solid waste mandates
on localities. (Albemarle)
0: Support recycling enterprise zones as a means of encouraging market
development.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE AND LAWS
POLICY STATEMENT
Since so many governmental actions need to take place at the localleve~ a strong local
government system is essential To ensure these needs are being met, local governments
must have the freedom and tools to carry out their responsibilities.
RECOMMENDATIONS
0: Support some of the recommendations of the Dillon Rule Commission;
among them -- amend 15.1-510 "General powers of counties and 15.1-839
"General grant of powers" (municipalities) to provide that authority
delegated to local government by the General Assembly be broadly
construed, equal revenue resources between cities and counties for the
purpose of easing local reliance on real estate taxes, establish uniform local
government powers, develop strategies for intergovernmental solutions and
clarify state and local responsibilities.
0: Strengthen sovereign immunity doctrine so that protection applies equally
to all forms of local government -- counties, cities and school boards.
0: Extend VRS coverage to local boards of supervisors.
0: Oppose the amendment of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to
require production of customized computer records. Allow local
governments to continue to charge reasonable fees as cost reimbursement
for those records which currently must be produced by local government
under this Act.
0: Oppose expansion of Heart/Lung Act to include a cancer presumption for
firefighters.
0: Support legislation to align state constitution with National Voter Registration
Act mandates (HJR 395). (Albemarle)
TJPDC, 413 E. Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie /-:.ronfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
-
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
.
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Lef(islative Program
Pa~e 8
HOUSING
POllCY STATEMENT
The Planning District and its members believe all Vuginians, particularly those of /ow and
nwderate income, should live in safe, decent, affordable housing.
RECOMMENDATIONS
]:X Support low income housing initiatives by continuing state funding of the
Housing Partnership Fund.
]:X Support efforts to maintain home ownership for at-risk population.
]:X Support incentives for regional initiatives to provide affordable housing.
]:X Provide funding for alternatives to water and septic systems.
]:X Support enabling legislation to allow regional planning and zoning to meet
regional affordable housing needs.
]:X Support legislation to lower the amount required (currently $1,000,000) to
allow real estate escrow account interest to be donated to Virginia Housing
Partnership Fund.
]:X Provide funding for construction or rehabilitation of transitional housing,
single room occupancy and groups homes.
]:X Support funding for state indoor plumbing program.
]:X Support means of encouraging more rental units in rural areas.
]:X Support increasing rental rehabilitation assistance.
]:X Support low interest mortgages for homeowners.
]:X Support Housing Study Commission recommendations on blighted and
deteriorated housing. .
]:X Oppose state pre-emption of local zoning to convert single family residences to
include an accessory dwelling unit.
]:X Oppose legislation that would provide an exemption from the transient
occupancy taxfor SRO (Single Room Occupancies).
I
TJPDC, 413 E. Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie bronfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Legislative ProJ(1"am
Page 9
PUBLIC SAFETY
RECOMMENDATIONS
l:t Continue to work on relieving local jails of state felons.
l:t Continue funding support of construction of local and regional jails.
l:t Fund fully per diem reimbursement for all prisoners.
l:t State expand diversion efforts.
l:t Support a change in the jail funding formula to require that the state
reimburse localities for half the cost within a five year amortization
schedule.
l:t Support changes to the method used by the Compensation Board to take
into account geographic area when computing the number of deputies.
l:t Support the location of a women's detention center in Fluvanna County.
l:t Support preventative measures to address crime, including intensive
cooperative efforts in neighborhoods.
l:t Support state funding for DARE programs within Sheriffs offices. (Albemarle)
l:t Support allowing localities to retain any unclaimed assets obtained by law
enforcement personnel. (Albemarle)
l:t Oppose state assuming control over regional jails. (Greene, Louisa, Fluvanna)
TRANSPORTATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
l:t Provide enabling legislation for transportation districts which would allow
for inclusion of State Universities and colleges.
l:t Fund regional transportation planning and local transportation needs
recognizing statewide significance of all aspects of transportation.
l:t Strengthen requirements and oversight of VDOT to make sure it considers
land use impacts and local comprehensive plans before proceeding with
highway projects (see policy under growth management).
TJPDC, 413 E. Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie t;'ronfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
-
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Legislative Program
Page 10
a Support additional transportation revenues to meet critical needs. Oppose any
reduction in money for our region including transit, rideshare, and traffic
reduction activities.
a Support measures that will increase the available funding to meet the
transporation needs in the next twenty years.
a Support the establishment of a Citizen Advisory Commission to VDOT for
the implementation of ISTEA-- Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act.
a Support flexible use of urban construction and maintenance funds.
a Support additional funding for secondary roads. (Albemarle)
a Support VDOT funding for relocation of gas lines. (Charlottesville)
REGIONAL HEALTH/SOCIAL SERVICES
RECOMMENDATIONS
a Continue state funding of indigent care.
a Ensure adequate sanitarian staff levels in local health departments.
a Support efforts to allow the local governments to use private, licensed
certified soil scientists to approve septic permits. (Fluvanna, Nelson)
a Support additional funding of the Comprehensive Service Act and full
flexibility for local governments in implementing this act. The state should
also provide additional administrative costs in carrying out this mandate
and help develop a forecasting model to annually predict caseloads.
a Support continued funding of the "Opportunity Knocks" Program. (Albemarle)
a Support efforts of Phase II of the Commission to Stimulate Personal Initiative
to Overcome Poverty to address manifestations of poverty and inherent
disincentives in current income-assistance programs. (Albemarle)
a Oppose additional local responsibility for service delivery of long-tenn care.
a Oppose any efforts to pre-empt local zoning for family day care.
a Support state clarification of standards and definitions for family day care.
Support tenninology to encourage intergenerational care in family day care.
TJPDC, ~13 E. Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie i'ronfeiter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
- .
(804) 972-1720,972-1719 (fax)
Thomas Jefferson PDC, 1994 Draft Legislative Program
Page 11
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
):t Support legislation to create a Neighborhood Reinvestment Partnership
between state and local governments. It would provide economic
stimulation for inner cities.
):t Support the broadening of the Main Street program to larger cities and
counties with urban areas.
):t Support a Commonwealth Economic Development Strategic Plan that
includes new marketing initiatives and financial incentives to enhance
industrial recruitment efforts for the Commonwealth and its local governments.
):t Support creating legislative authority for local governments to use local funds
to provide financing for business.
):t Support continued funding for the CORD Program.
):t Support investment in the GIS system for research.
):t Support altering the State Enterprise Zone Program to allow existing small
businesses, as well as big businesses, to reap benefits.
):t Support creation of Urban Business Site Assembly and Clearance Fund to
allow state funds to be used to convert obsolete commercial and industrial
areas to be more active business zones.
):t Support creation of State Economic Development Board to assure continuity
in economic development practices from administration to administration.
):t Support allowing local governments to vary tax assessment ratios to give short
term benefits to new businesses.
):t Support regional approaches to economic development.
):t Support expansion of shell building site program.
TJPDC, 13 E, Market St., Ste. 102
Bonnie [< onfelter, Legislative Liaison
Charlottesville, VA 22902
-
(804) 972-1720, 972-1719 (fax)
to 1994 Draft Legislative Program (since November 4th):
age 1: On item #2, delete "mislabeled as private property
rotection laws"
age 2: On item #6, add "state" before Conservation and
ecreation Fund
Add Recommendation #20: Support legislation to set the
ethod for the establishment of the Virginia Department of
axation's Sales Assessment Ratio (i.e., period of time for the use
f sales in the "Mini Ratio" Study and use of ratios of 1).
Louisa)
age 7: Add Recommendation #7: Support enabling legislation to
llow Board of supervisors to call for a referendum on the direct
lection of school boards. (Greene)
Add Recommendation #8: support legislation that would
ermit Louisa County to also become a member of the Richmond
egional Planning District Commission. (Louisa)
age 8: Delete item #9: "Support means of encouraging more
ental units in rural areas."
age 8: Add Recommendation #15: Support means of encouraging
oan programs to serve existing residents and give preference to or
or allowing residents to remain in their locality. (Greene)
age 9: Add Recommendation #12: Oppose any actions, legislative
r administrative, which would defund dispatchers currently funded
y the Comp Board whether or not E911 has been fully initiated in
locality. (Greene)
//~ /.;2-1;.}
~?J. / / /7(5,</ )
State Compensation Board
Month of
IJdl-dbe; /195
,
. .....................................................,.-..-....-.,.,~...,.
......................................................-.. -.......,.... .....
:';":';':';':':':';';':-:.;.:-:.:.;.;.:-:.:.:.:.:-:-;.;.;.:';';';':';';';';':':';';,:-:,:,;,;,:,;,;.,.;.;.:-:.:.:.:-;.:",'.",-;':-:'.";",':':':-:
.................................................................--.......
"' ................................................-.....,.~._-.._-... -.
................................................... .....,' ...-..-.....
"' ......... ..... ............. --.. ........................ ...-. ,---.. ...
......-............................................... .....,..............
. .....'.......-....-... ......,....... ....................--..-..,-.....,-.
...........,...... ,..........................-.... ....-.. -.-....-...,...'. ."-.'
.. ... ...........-........................... ....--....-.._... .-,.... '.,'.'
...............-...............-....,.........................-.._.....,......-,.......,...........,..,.....".".,..---_.........
.. ..-.......-................................................,..-..--...
. ................................................~..........-.....-..
.........U.//O.............;e............MI;{.....................W...........1\D]......{................],W'......................)...
... .. .' ". ..... ". ... .... .' .. .' '.. ..- ........
..... ... ... . ..... ..... ...
... - .. . . ...... . . .. .. . . - - -.. ". .....
", ....... ". "...
.... .. .. . . - . . ."." ..
....................................-........... ....-...'........--..
.. ..............................-............................. ". -......
........... ............... ............... .........
.. .........................................
....... -...........
STATEMENT OF EXPENSES
.
lerk, Circuit Court
- 0 -
~s i 7~
:J/ ,;2S t/ /~
- I
No e: Expenses listed above are only those office expenses in
wh'ch the state Compensation Board has agreed to participate, and
ar not the total office expenses of these departments.
-'"
1
Edward H. ain, Jr
Samuel Mi ler
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902.4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
ScotlsviJle
David P. 80 erman
Charlotles iIle
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Joue
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Shelby J. Marshall, Clerk
Circuit Court
Ella W.
.-. 1 ",
Carey, Clerk C1UC
November 18, 1993
SUBJECT:
Resolution for Christmas Holiday
At its meeting on November 17, 1993, the Board of Supervi-
sors adopted a resolution allowing the office of the Clerk of the
ircuit Court to close for the same Christmas holidays that the
ounty closes. County offices will be closed on December 24 and
December 27, 1993. Attached is the resolution.
ttachment
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
(1)
Printed on recycled paper
v'
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County
as requested that this office be allowed to close on the same
(hhristmas holiday (December 24 and December 27) for 1993 as the
(ffices of the CountYi and
WHEREAS, the County Executive of Albemarle County has recom-
rended that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors approve such
equesti
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Circuit
Court's request is hereby granted by the Albemarle County Board of
~ upervisors .
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing
is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the
Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular
rreeting held on November 17, 1993.
cle~'/io~r}~ ~~~~ Supervisors
~~sl 16
i
.L")vlJ.H.-f
Ii - t7 _<I ~
.-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
;"~o: ~:::'!:'I/ 'mi,o 1m@mow m ~~-~l
~':J~ -11111 S ' :J l.
Q~ - '1 '
~ -1. :r, " ; I '"Q'3, ,
~'ll "J ~ _'li ~"-
, .-' f I
l//?(;\t-'\" I
. -sOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
~
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
DATE: November 16, 1993
RE: circuit Court Clerk's Office Resolution
. Shelby Marshall, Clerk of the Circuit Court, has requested
at the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution allowing her
fice to close for the same Christmas holidays (Dec. 24 and 27)
at the County closes. The following resolution is recommended
r your approval:
EREAS, the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County has
requested that this office be allowed to close on the
same Christmas holiday for 1993 as the offices of the
County of Albemarle; AND
EREAS, the County Executive of Albemarle County has recommended
that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors approve
such request;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Clerk of the Circuit
Court's request is hereby granted by the Albemarle
Board of Supervisors.
T is resolution is required in order for her to obtain a court
o der allowing her to close her offices.
S ould you have any questions concerning this matter, please do
n t hesitate to contact me.
T,Jr/
.218
c Ms. Shelby J. Marshall
.
//- ),';; - 53
':/,3 / / / ? (i~S-
1993
THIRD QUARTER
BUILDING REPORT
; L j ,
LUQARD OF SUPERV/SORSJ
.
County of Albemarle
Department of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
INDEX
I. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month (Charts A - B)
Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Type (Charts C - D)
II . Comparison of All Building Permits (Chart E)
. Comparison of Certificates of Occupancy (Charts F - H)
Key to Types of Housing Used in this Report
SF
SFA
SF/I'H
DUP
MF
MHC
Single Family (Includes Modular)
Single Family Attached
Single Family Townhouse
Duplex
Multi-Family Residence
MobileHomes in County
.
-2-
During the third quarter of 1993, 219 permits were issued for
242 dwelling units. In addition, 8 permits were issued for mobile
homes in existing parks at an average exchange value of $2,500 for a
total of $20,000.
I. COMPARISON OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY MONTH
Chart A. Nine Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling
Units by Month
YEAR 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
JAN 46 37 38 22 93 56 64 183 49
FEB 29 43 35 40 172 68 31 72 56
MAR 94 37 62 91 61 92 57 64 58
APR 48 78 70 71 49 82 62 72 76
MAY 121 73 73 83 89 75 44 62 45
JUN 60 92 56 83 220 85 54 48 79
JUL 57 159 80 30 67 42 58 62 81
AUG 86 32 46 49 74 87 58 126 116
SEP 35 49 45 46 72 90 55 48 45
OCT 40 52 60 52 56 48 39 43 0
NOV 45 50 49 60 301 37 42 49 0
DEC 53 35 40 46 55 42 50 37 0
TOTAL 714 737 654 673 1309 804 614 866 605
Chart B. Three Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling
Units by Month
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
IZ2I 1991 [SS] 1992 ~ 1993
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
. .
-3-
rrHIRD QUARTER 1993
~I. COMPARISON OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY TYPE
Chart C. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by
Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type
.
MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL % TOTAL
DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC D.U. D,U.
~HARLOTTESVILLE 4 0 0 0 24 0 28 12%
flACK JOUETT 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1%
~IVANNA 65 0 40 0 0 2 107 44%
IsAMUEL MILLER 23 2 0 0 0 2 27 11%
~COTTSVILLE 32 5 0 0 0 1 38 16%
~ITE HALL 27 9 0 0 0 3 39 16%
TOTAL 154 16 40 0 24 8 242 100%
Chart D. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by
Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type
DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS
COMP PLAN AREA SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC URBAN RURAL
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 24 0 24
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 12 0 27 0 0 0 39
PRBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 14 5 0 0 0 0 19
PRBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 4 2 0 0 0 0 6
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ROZET COMMUNITY 10 9 0 0 0 0 19
~OLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 21 0 13 0 0 0 34
SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~LYSVILLE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
PINEY MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~IVANNA VILLAGE 17 0 0 0 0 0 17
GROWTH AREA SUBTOTAL 80 16 40 0 24 1 161
~URAL AREA 1 19 0 0 0 0 3 22
~URAL AREA 2 15 0 0 0 0 2 17
~URAL AREA 3 22 0 0 0 0 0 22
RURAL AREA 4 18 0 0 0 0 2 20
RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 74 0 0 0 0 7 81
TOTAL 154 16 40 0 24 8 242
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
!
!
i
I
!
-4-
THIRD QUARTER 1993
III. cm PARISON OF ALL BUILDING PERMITS
Ch~rt E. Estimated Cost of Construction by Magisterial District and Construction Type
MAGISTER AL NEW *NEW NON-RES. NEW COMMERCIAL FARM BULDING
DISTRIC' RESIDENTIAL & ALTER. RES. & NEW INSTITUT. & ALTER. COMM. TOTAL
No. Amount~~ No. Amount-~ No. Amount-~ No. Amount-~ No. Amount-~
CHVILLE 5 969,200 14 143,835 2 1,670,000 23 531,604 44 3,314,639
JOUETT 3 1,045,000 12 245,232 0 0 7 297,500 22 1,587,732
RIVANNA 107 9,835,811 52 597,052 14 8,641,369 19 1,369,550 192 20,443,782
S, MILLEl 27 4,412,280 45 835,805 0 0 6 33,600 78 5,281,685
SCOTTSVIlLE 38 3,009,333 40 4,853,510 5 237,590 11 51,928 94 8,152,361
WHITE HAl L 39 4,624,003 37 481,371 5 125,000 7 150,000 88 5,380,374
TOTAL 219 23,895,627 200 7,156,805 26 10,673,959 73 2,434,182 518 44,160,573
* Additi<na1 value of mobile homes placed in existing parks is included in Residential
A1teralion category.
IV, CER"IFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
ChaIt F. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Elementary
School District and Dwelling Unit Type
SCHOOL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL PERCENT
DISTRicT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC D.U. TOTAL D.U.
Agnc r-Hurt 4 0 10 0 0 0 14 7.95%
Bro~dus Wood/Henley 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.14%
Bro~dus Wood/Jouett 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Bro~lnsville 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.25%
Crozet 29 3 0 0 0 0 32 18.18%
Greer 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.00%
Hollymead 18 5 12 0 0 0 35 19.89%
Merilwether Lewis 8 0 0 0 2 0 10 5.68%
Munay 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.70%
Red !Hill 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.14%
Ca1ellBur1ey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,00%
Ca1eVwa1ton 16 8 0 0 0 0 24 13 . 64%
Scot tsvi11e 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 3.98%
Sto~~ Robinson/Burley 25 0 0 0 0 0 25 14,20%
Sto~~ Robinson/Wa1ton 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1.14%
Sto~w Point 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 2.27%
Woodbrook 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,00%
Yanc~y 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 2.84%
TOTAL 134 16 22 0 2 2 176 100.00%
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
i
.. . ..
-5-
. HIRD QUARTER 1993
V, CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY ( continued)
Chart G. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by
Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type
-
MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE
DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC TOTAL
( HARLOTTESVILLE 2 0 3 0 0 0 5
, ACK JOUETT 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
I IVANNA 48 5 19 0 0 1 73
: AMUEL MILLER 18 0 0 0 0 0 18
: COTTSVILLE 25 8 0 0 0 1 34
\ mITE HALL 40 3 0 0 2 0 45
TOTAL 134 16 22 0 2 2 176
Chart H. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by
Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type
DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS
COMP PlAN AREA SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC URBAN RURAL
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 4 0 10 0 0 0 14
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 10 8 0 0 0 0 18
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 5
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CROZET COMMUNITY 26 3 0 0 0 0 29
HOLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 16 0 12 0 0 0 28
SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EARLYSVILLE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PINEY MTN. VILLAGE 0 5 0 0 0 0 5
NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
RIVANNA VILLAGE 18 0 0 0 0 0 18
I GROWTH AREA SUBTOTAL 80 16 22 0 0 0 118
RURAL AREA 1 9 0 0 0 2 0 11
RURAL AREA 2 10 0 0 0 0 1 11
RURAL AREA 3 21 0 0 0 0 0 21
RURAL AREA 4 14 0 0 0 0 1 15
RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 54 0 0 0 2 2 58
TOTAL 134 16 22 0 2 2 176
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
.
C 11 ( \1,1 ( ) I t I .' ; \' i'" t i
HOlt3j l1g
FUll nr!<lLi () 11
//- /~-<}J
7,}, /1/"1 6-: t .)
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Forrest Kerns
.-
~";,...,dO.\S\/\G_' .-
- ----.-.,\
1 \
C'h~: 'i
e" . , ~..y'" I \
. \\\' \ (" i
i n \ lflC li ~~- @ -ill' ~.\.\
\ ....."._l.1
TO:
Robert Tucker
David Benish
DATE:
October 29, 1993
RE: Crozet Crossing
Enclosed is the Crozet Crossing Status Report. I have also enclosed a
list of the purchase contracts with sales data.
I wrote this last week for the CHF Board and should have sent you the
report then.
Forrest Kerns
Enclosures - 2
...'~
(.;Ull' '1 1(1:n
" .....~.;
_,1--:i~
100 Court Square Annex, Suite E . Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 . tl04/979-09ti7
C h il r I () I j t .' : \' i lit'
Housi llg
Fl)llll(lal,itJll
MEMORANDUM
Robert Tucker
David Benish
Forrest D. Kerns
October 20, 1993
CROZET CROSSING STATUS REPORT
Sales. Crozet Crossing has eight families living in their homes and
contracts have been signed for nineteen homes. Presently there are three
dditional houses to be sold and two of these are designed to FmHA
specifications. The Selection Committee met on October 11th to designate
dditional families to sell houses. Enough families were selected to
qualify buyers for the remaining available houses and any of the other
omes which the contract buyers may not be able to obtain a mortgage.
Construction. Alexander/Nicholson completed the job and moved off
site by September 21st.
Haley Chisholm & Morris, the sitework contractor, have work that needs
to be completed to comply with the Erosion Control Plan. Jack Kelsey,
County Engineer, is assisting CHF and HCM with this work.
The fence for the lot line on the souths ide has been started this week
by AHIP.
Construction Financing. The payment request for A/N due in October is
for $167,940. Two mortgages have closed to date that will yield $131,200
hich is planned as this month's payment to A/N and we will make an
additional payment early in November.
Parade of Homes. The Blue Ridge Home Builders invited CHF to show a
Crozet Crossing house in this year's Parade of Homes as a non-profit entry.
The house was open on two weekends and one day for realtors. We had 125
visitors from the area including people from Orchard Acres, the Crozet
community and Charlottesville/Albemarle area.
Crozet Crossing Community Association Inc. The home owners group met
on October 18th at the Me~dows Community Center for its first
organizational meeting. Ten families were represented at the meeting: some
have moved in their home and others are potential home owners. A Marketing
representative from Virginia Power talked to the homeowners about Energy
Saver Homes and how to efficiently operate the heat pump.
100 Court Square Annex, Suite }i~ . Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 . ~04/979-0967
CROZET CROSSING SALES DATA FKCCSALE.WK1
10/20/93
ttt/MOd/ Type Sale Mortgage Deferred Cash VHPF C 10 s e Fm1y
o BR's Cling La Name Loan Amount Amount Amount Paid 2nd Cost Size
21-B-3 6073 Alvizo VHPF 82,100 65,500 16,100 500 0 2,500 4
3-A-3 6112 Belew VHDA-6.12 84,700 55,000 29,200 500 0 2,500 2
16-B-3 6008 Bland VHDA 82,475 55,500 23,975 1,550 1,450 2
12-E-3 6040 Blivens/Cart VHPF 82,100 62,700 18,900 500 0 2,500 2
25-B-3 6039 Bradley VHPF 82,230 59,500 22,100 500 0 2,500 2
22-B-3 6065 Cromer VHDA 82,420 55,500 23,920 500 2,500 3
10-C-4 6056 Crosby VHDA-6.12 86,400 69,100 16,800 500 0 2,500 4
9-D-4 6064 Fugett VHDA-6.12 87,400 69,900 17,000 500 0 2,500 2
23-A-3 6055 Greenlee VHPF 83,200 72,000 9,600 1,500 0 2,500 4
ll-D-4 6048 Jett/Sandrid NB-CR2 87,600 64,000 23,000 500 2,500 0 4
14-C-4 6024 Johnson-Will VHDA 86,500 72,414 9,262 2,638 2,500 4
4-A-3 6104 Jones VHDA 84,700 53,000 25,200 6,500 0 2,500 2
29-C-4 6001 Knight VHPF 86,400 65,500 19,833 640 2,000 3
28-B-3 6009 Lewis VHDA 82,675 63,500 16,175 900 2,500 2
8-A-3 6072 Mingee VHDA-6.12 86,950 54,500 29,700 500 0 2,500 2
15-D-4 6016 Monterrozo VHDA 86,100 63,900 19,200 500 2,500 6
26-A-3 6031 Moore VHPF 82,100 64,000 17,600 500 0 2,500 4
18-A-3 6097 Parker VHDA 86,950 59,000 21,200 500 2,500 0 2
24-C-4 6047 Powell VHDA-6.88 86,950 68,100 15,850 500 2,500 4
eO-D-4 6000 Reid VHDA 87,400 69,900 13,950 1,050 2,500 4
27-B-3 6017 Snow VHDA 82,000 63,000 16,000 500 2,500 3
6-A-3 6088 Wa1ton/ShieIVHDA-6.12 84,700 67,700 16,500 500 0 2,500 2
17-A-3 6105 Williams VHDA 84,700 67,700 16,500 500 0 2,500 2
l-A-3 6128 Wise VHDA-6.12 87,600 67,700 16,500 500 0 2,500 2
13-D-4 6032 Murray VHPF 86,300 70,500 15,100 500 0 2,500 2
5-B-3 6096 Olson VHDA 84,700 56,000 25,700 500 2,500 0 2
2-A-3 6120 Staton NB-CR2 82, 100 58,000 21, 100 500 0 2,500 4
19-A-3 6089 86,100 63,000 19,100 500 0 2,500 2
20-E-3 6081 79,100 79,100 0 0 0 4
7-E-3 6080 79,100 79,100 0 0 0 4
~OTAL MORTGAGES FOR 30 HOUSES 2,533,750 1,934,314 535,065 25,278 28,450 40,000
~VERAGE MORT&CASH AMOUNT 65,320 85
~ VERAGE DEFERRED LOAN 17,836 2.83
e
I\':>t.
. I. . ,~ !~ 2
To . JOCU<>- ,I) nl,!~)
/. /,~/<f,3,
93, ;)) 1>- (S, 7 )
~lllnl
Monticello
The Home of Thomas Jefferson
P.O. Box 316
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
1 \~.; r :, ;
'l\~~-
lJ I 1
\'~\
\\ \ ' "..- .
UUl i
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
October 28, 1993
. David P. Bowerman, Chairman
lbemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McEntyre Road
C arlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
The Virginia Department of Transportation has just informed us that
onticello has been awarded $1.5 million in ISTEA enhancement monies for
t e construction of the first phase of the Thomas Jefferson Parkway.
T is grant was the largest in the Commonwealth. We wanted immediately
t thank our friends in the community who supported the project, wrote
I tters for it, and, ultimately, assured the success of our application.
without your help, the Thomas Jefferson Parkway would continue to
a plan, a dream, an ordinary stretch of state highway. Because of
y ur support, the parkway will become a reality. The two-mile
bicycle/hiking trail will serve as a bridge between Monticello and the
I cal community. The 175-acre tract will evolve into a community park
f r citizens of Albemarle County and beyond. Improved safety and
a sthetic features will tremendously enhance the experience of 550,000
arly visitors to Monticello as well as thousands of local residents
o use Route 53 each day.
On the 250th anniversary of Thomas Jefferson's birth, the parkway
an appropriate gift to the citizens of Central Virginia and the
tion. We're especially grateful for the broad-based community support
at strengthened our case -- and that means you and the Supervisors!
ain, our genuine thanks.
Sincerely yours,
tr01/1;V
//" .
~~~
D niel P. Jordan,
E ecutive Director
Will Rieley,
Rieley & Associates
/Ii/lc~ /f", .{j;1
Peter Hatch,
Director of
Gardens and Grounds
Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation, Inc.
League of Women Voters
L:';T;~i'~J'.) r;'_~:.:.' "'-~
. . I j(~' ,'7n C1' 2.
"ci_..lJ,.L1.L:.I_:, ...L.--....-..--. // - /e.-:? - 9:3
<:)3, /1 / 7(~~ g)
of Charlottesville and Albemarle County -
413 East Market Street, Room 203. Charlottesville. VA 22902
Phone: (804) 972-1795
October 12, 1993
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors
4 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, VA 22902
. r,1 (F) ~? ~ lifl
! !\J. ILl L, \l!
, '. . _.- . -
.,. <.__~_A.__'.'~_._.-"_"~"> ,,". ....,
. .....L"'_J_~...,-.....__......_____".._.........__"._ -'-~""
,
; 1
i .jLl Iii
~-iOARD OF SUPERVISOR~
The League of Women Voters of Charlottesville/Albemarle recently studied energy use and
th potential for increasing energy efficiency in our area. In so doing, we received input from
C arlottesville City and Albemarle County staff and are grateful for the assistance they were able to
pr vide.
D ar Members of the Board of Supervisors:
Three major conclusions emerged from our efforts, First, using energy more efficiently can
fr e public and private dollars for other uses, create jobs locally, and reduce pollution. Second, while
A ericans have become more conscientious about using energy efficiently, we still waste energy
pr fligately. For example, one source we consulted estimates that Americans could save $200 billion
a nually if we simply used energy as efficiently as western Europe and Japan. Finally, we found only
Ii ited evidence of County government attempts to invest in increased energy efficiency . We applaud
th Albemarle County Schools for decreasing energy use in the past several years, but believe that the
C unty should do more.
We urge the County to integrate energy efficiency considerations into all aspects of local
g vernment operations and planning. We further recommend that the City of Charlottesville,
A bemarle County, and the University of Virginia jointly develop an "Energy Action Plan" for the
C arlottesville/ Albemarle area in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan revisions. Governor
ilder's 1991 Virginia Energy Plan requires that all state agencies reduce energy use by 25 percent
1998. Why not adopt this mandate locally?
We appreciate that the County government is already overburdened and that staff and re-
rces are spread thin. But the very fact of limited government resources should hasten, not impede,
speed with which the County invests in energy efficiency, since such investment can free re-
rces that are currently being wasted.
The League would be happy to participate in any efforts you undertake to enhance energy
ef iciency. We have compiled several energy "fact sheets" and enclose them for your information.
S(?~ D~
Ginnie Decker, President
E closure
"...a non-parti an organization dedicated to the promotion of informed and active participation of citizens in government."
A WASTE OF ENERGY
Fact Sheets on Energy Use and Conservation Opportunities
Compiled by the League of Women Voters
Charlottesville/Albemarle, Virginia
June 1993
Fact Sheet
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A Waste of Energy
Contents
Material Covered
positions on Energy, League of Women Voters
Energy consumption in the united States
Energy Consumption in Virginia
Transportation
utilities and Energy Efficiency
Simple Ways to Save Energy Around the Home
Home construction and Retrofits
Energy Use in Business and Industry
Fac Sheet #1
National League of Women Voters
Positions on Energy
Th National Leaaue of Women Voters sunnorts:
- F educing energy use growth rates
- Wslng a variety of energy sources, with emphasis on conserving energy and using energy-efficient
tec~nologies
he environmentally sound use of energy resources, with consideration of the entire cycle of energy
prclduction
- F redominant reliance on renewable resources
- F olicies that limit reliance on nuclear power
- (povernment action to encourage the use of renewable resources and energy conservation
- ~~andatory energy conservation measures, Including Improved thermal standards for building efficiency,
ne rv appliance standards, and standards for new automobiles with no relaxation of auto-emlssion controls
- F olicies to reduce energy demand and to minimize the need for new generating capacity, through such
tec~niques as peak-load pricing or demand management programs
- } ssistance for low-income individuals when energy policies bear unduly on the poor
So~rce: Impact on Issues. 1992-1994: A Leader's Guide to National Proarams. League of Women Voters
of he United States. pp. 36-37
Fact Sheet #2
ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN THE UNITED STATES
With five percent of the world's population, the United States consumes 25 percent of all energy
broduced worldwide.
n 1990, total U. S. energy consumption was 85 quadrillion Btu, or 340 million Btu per person. 340
million Btu is the energy equivalent of about 16 tons of coal or 65 barrels of gasoline.
otal 1990 energy consumption broke down as follows:
Fuel tvoe
Petroleum
Gas
Coal
Other
40 percent
23
22
15
TOTAL
100 percent
Sector
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Transportation
Electrical generation
losses
12 percent
8
30
26
24
TOTAL
100 percent
(' Electrical losses" represent the tremendous amount of energy that is lost when electricity is generated and
t ansmitted. In 1990, this amounted to 20 quadrillion Btu, or the energy equivalent of 666 million tons of
cbal.)
Energy consumption and population both rose by about 25 percent between 1960 and 1990.
Tne U. S. is increasingly dependent on foreign oil. We imported about 37 percent of our oil in 1973
ahd about 53 percent in 1992.
(OVER)
Because of investment in energy efficiency, U. S. energy bills have been reduced by about $150 billion
per year. But the Rocky Mountain Institute estimates that we could save an additional $200 billion
per year, if we were as efficient as western Europe and Japan.
Many communities across the country have saved money for homes and businesses and spurred
local economic development through enhanced energy efficiency:
The town of Fremont, Nebraska (population 24,000) installed more efficient lighting, improved
energy efficiency in operations and transit, and development energy management systems for their
schools and hospital. These actions saved enough money to give taxpayers a 15 percent return
on their energy efficiency investment and substituted local labor and materials for energy previously
imported from elsewhere.
Residents of Osage, Iowa (population 3,800) experienced lower utility rates after the local utility
implemented a comprehensive efficiency program. The utility estimated that conservation programs
keep over $1,000,000 in the local economy.
Inexpensive solar greenhouses were installed extensively in the San Luis Valley, Colorado, in the
late 1970s. Organizers estimate that the costs of these units are recouped every year in energy
savings.
Despite the air pollution controls that have been required of vehicles, industry, and some utilities,
:U. S. air pollutant emissions associated with energy production and use are still staggering.
Americans create millions of tons of airborne sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, carbon
dioxide, and organic compounds annually when fuel is burned.
REFERENCES
Browning, William D, and L. Hunter Lovins. Enerav Casebook, Snowmass. Colorado: Rocky Mountain
Institute, (This analysis was partially sponsored by the U. S. Department of Energy.)
Kallander, Nancy, Division of Energy, Department of Mines. Minerals and Energy, Commonwealth of Virginia.
Personal communication (regarding 1992 U. S. dependence on foreign oil). June 9, 1992.
MacKenzie, James J., Roger C. Dower, and Donald D. T. Chen. 1992. The Goina Rate: What It Reallv Costs
to Drive. Washington: World Resources Institute.
U. S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. 1992. Annual Enerav Outlook 1992.
Washington: U. S. Department of Energy,
Fact Sheet #3
ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN VIRGINIA
~irginians consumed 1,977 trillion Btu of energy in 1990, or about 320 million Btu per Virginian.
~irginians spent over $12.25 billion on energy in 1990 (37 percent on electricity and 55 percent on
petroleum products). This is an average of about $2,000 per capita annually.
n 1980, per capita energy consumption in Virginia was 20 percent below the national average. In
~989, it was only 3.5 percent below the national average.
~etween 1975 and 1990, U. S. energy consumption grew by 15 percent while Virginia's grew by 45
percent. Part of this growth can be attributed to rapid growth in population and economic activity,
put Virginians have also failed to invest significantly in energy efficiency to counteract this growth.
~nergy consumption for Virginia in 1990 broke down as follows:
Fuel Tvpe
Petroleum
Coal
Electricity imports
Nuclear
Natural gas
Wood/waste/hydro
40 percent
17
16
13
9
5
TOTAL
100 percent
Sector
Transportation
Electricity losses
Industry
Residential
Commercial
31 percent
29
20
12
8
TOTAL
100 percent
('Electricity losses" are the energy lost (e,g., heat) when electricity is generated and transmitted.)
Energy consumed in buildings occupied by the Virginia state government cost taxpayers over $100
l1~iIIion in 1990. The 1991 "Virginia Energy Plan" asks each state agency to reduce energy use by 25
~ercent by 1998, relative to 1990 use levels. The plan's two primary goals are to: (1) increase energy
e~iciency and conservation in state government and by its clients, and (2) to advance the use of
renewable and alternative energy sources in Virginia.
(OVER)
One estimate projects that an aggressive conservation program in Virginia could add 3500 jobs to the
state,
The City of Charlottesville spent $1.1 million on electricity in FY 1992 - street lighting accounted for
42 percent of this amoun~ - and $300,000 on fuel and oil for City-owned vehicles. For these energy
sectors alone, the City~3v[tens (perhaps hundreds) of thousands of dollars by 1998 by meeting the
energy efficiency goal (25 percent reduction In energy use) established for state-run agencies.
The Albemarle County schools have employed several measures to reduce energy use. The school
system has decreased electricity usage by 3 percent even though total square footage has increased
by 10 percent between the 1989-90 and 1991-92 school years. The energy cost per square foot of
operating the County schools was 8 percent lower In the 1991-1992 school year relative to 1989-1990.
A recent analysis by the Virginia Energy Coalition estimated that Virginians could reduce electricity
consumption by 36 percent by employing commercially available, cost-effective energy efficiency
techniques.
REFERENCES
Browning, William D. and L. Hunter Lovins. Eneray Casebook. Snowmass, Colorado: Rocky Mountain
Institute. (This work was partially funded by the U. S. Department of Energy.)
City of Charlottesville. May 1993. Sharon Hilbert, personal communication regarding city expenditures for
selected energy uses.
Commonwealth of Virginia, Governor's Office. August 20, 1991. "The Virginia Energy Plan."
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy. 1991. Virainia Eneray Patterns and
Trends.
Conservation Council of Virginia. 1992. "Air Quality and Energy Policy in Virginia." A report from the
conference, "Air/Energy '92: New Directions for Virginia," September 26, 1992.
Virginia Energy Coalition. December 1992. Enemy 2000: A Blueprint for an Eneray Efficient Virainia.
(Available from the Southern Environmental Law Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.)
Fact Sheet #4
TRANSPORTATION
Vehicle use In this area is growing approximately 4 times faster than population. Nationally, vehicle
us is increasing 2 to 3 times faster than total population.
Statewide, our consumption of energy for transportation is 31 percent of total energy consumption.
Transportation-related oil consumption grew by 21 percent between 1973 and 1990. 66 percent of
U. S. oil consumption Is transportation-related.
A World Resources Institute study estimated that automobile driving Imposes costs of $653 billion
on the U. S. economy every year, due to such factors as highway construction and repair, accidents,
na ional security costs, and highway services (police, fire, etc.),
Motor vehicles contribute almost half of the smog-related air pollutants and about two-thirds of the
ca bon monoxide air pollution in the U. S. Cars also emit carbon dioxide, which exacerbates global climate
ch ~nge.
One acre of paved surface sends 30,000 gallons of polluted water to the nearest waterway with each
inc h of rain.
Increased population can--and has--offset the impact of reduced emissions. Building more roads
en :::ourages automobile use, can increase energy use and air pollution, and does not always alleviate
cO'lgestion.
Re commendations
As voters, we can encourage planning that facilitates mass transit, walking, and bicycling.
Walk or bicycle, if possible.
Take a bus or carpool.
Plan trips for the least gasoline consumption and the least cold starts (which produce more
err issions).
Maintain your vehicle in optimum condition. Drive at a moderate, steady speed and turn off the
en gine any time you stop for more than one-half minute.
(OVER)
REFERENCES
Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization. 1992. Personal communication, Hannah
Twaddell, Senior Planner. 804-972-1720
Environmental Defense Fund Newsletter. January 1993. 212-505-2100
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy. Viminia Enemv Patterns and
Trends. 1-800-552-3831
MacKenzie, James J., Roger C. Dower, and Donald D. T. Chen. 1992, The Goina Rate: What It Reallv Costs
to Drive. Washington: World Resources Institute. 212-682-5010
Chesapeake Bay Foundation Newsletter. September 1992. 410-268-8816
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy. 1992. Drivina for Enemv Efficiencv.
1-800-552-3831
National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Office of the Director. 1991. The U. S. Acid Precioitation
Assessment Proaram 1990 Intearated Assessment Reoort. Washington: GPO.
Fac t Sheet #5
UTILITIES AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY
WI at is "energy efficiency"?
Energy efficiency means Investing In technologies that (1) provide at least the same or better quality
of service as the inefficiency technologies they replace, (2) consume less energy, and (3) save
money.
The utility-funded Electric Power Research Institute believes that, with 100 percent penetration of
the most efficient, available technologies, we can save from 24 to 44 percent of U. S. electricity by
the year 2000. The U. S. Office of Technology Assessment has concluded that energy use in
buildings could be reduced by 33 percent by 2015. The Rocky Mountain Institute projects a long-
term potential to save 75 percent of electricity at relatively low costs.
W Itat has motivated utilities to promote energy efficiency?
Energy efficiency improvements generally involve less cost, less risk, and less pollution relative to
building new power plants. For example: one high-efficiency light bulb over its lifetime eliminates
the need for over 500 lb. of coal or nearly one barrel of oil and can save up to $100.
Reducing energy consumption, and its attendant costs, can help create jobs.
W ~at have utilities in other parts of the country done?
Utilities in at least 31 states have begun to develop Integrated Resource Planning programs that
balance energy conservation ("demand side management") with building new capacity ("supply side
management").
Creative economic development programs-in which utilities have assisted local businesses to
become more energy efficient-have been undertaken in Iowa, Massachusetts, Indiana, Washington
state, Wisconsin, and California. Such programs save money and create jobs.
In states outside of Virginia, utilities have invested aggressively in programs to purchase energy
savings from their customers. Niagara Mohawk Power's residential program saves each household
$272 per year by providing each customer with low-flow shower heads, a compact fluorescent bulb
and insulation for pipes and water heaters.
What are utilities In Virginia doing to promote energy efficiency?
Until recently, Virginia Power and other state power generators have focused primarily on meeting
demand by building new plants.
In 1993 Virginia Power formed a new Energy Efficiency Department and developed "ConserVision."
If this program is approved by the State Corporation Commission, Virginia Power would make 7,000
low-interest loans for high-efficiency measures in existing homes and businesses, experiment with
"residential peak day pricing," provide up to $2 million for "advanced technology" energy efficiency
measures in new homes and in businesses. and spend up to $750,000 for rebates on heat pump
inspections.
(OVER)
What further actions by Virginia's utilities should be encouraged?
Considering efficiency on an equal footing with building new capacity and using renewable fuel
sources. whenever building new capacity is necessary.
Developing more comprehensive demand-side programs (e.g.. offering rebates. not just loans. for
existing homes and businesses. and subsidizing energy-efficient new construction).
REFERENCES
Browning, William D. and L Hunter Lovins. 1989. Enemy Casebook. Snowmass, Colorado: Rocky
Mountain Institute. (This work was partially funded by the U. S. Department of Energy.)
Conservation Council of Virginia. 1992. "Air Quality and Energy Policy in Virginia." A report from the
conference "Air/Energy '92: New Directions for Virginia," September 26, 1992.
Electric Power Research Institute. 1990. "Efficient Electricity Use: Estimates of Maximum Energy Savings."
Cited in Arnold P. Fickett, Clark W. Gellings, and Amory B. Lovins, "Efficient Use of Electricity." Scientific
American (September 1990): 65-74.
Fickett, Arnold P., Oark W. Gellings, and Amory B. Lovins. 1990. "Efficient Use of Energy." Scientific
American, September 1990, 65-74.
New England Electric System Companies and the Conservation Law Foundation of New England.
September 1989. "Power By Design: A New Approach to Investing in Energy Efficiency."
U. S. Department of Energy. 1991. National Eneray Strateay, First Edition (1991/1992). Washington:
U. S. GPO. p. 36
Virginia Energy Coalition. December 1992. "Energy 2000: A Blueprint for an Energy Efficient Virginia."
(Available from the Southern Environmental Law Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.)
Fact Sheet #6
SIMPLE WAYS TO SAVE ENERGY AROUND THE HOME
The federal government estimates that the residential sector consumes 12% of the energy used in the
United States. This fact sheet looks at some low or no-cost actions that can reduce the amount of energy
used in an apartment or house. These simple steps can save up to 20% of an average home's energy
costs, or hundreds of dollars per year.
Space Heating
*Turn down your thermostat in winter. 65-680F when you are active and 50-6QoF when you are in bed,
unless you have elderly people, infants or persons with certain illnesses in your home.
*Keep heat in by keeping doors, windows. and chimney flue closed except when in use. Open your drapes
or blinds and let the sun shine in south-facing windows. Close drapes and blinds at night and in north-
facing windows.
*Arrange your furniture so that vents. radiators, and baseboard heaters are not blocked.
Water Heating
*Lower the temperature of your hot water heater (try 1200F or 1400F if you have a dishwasher).
*Insulate your hot water heater with an insulation blanket. Blankets can reduce your hot water bill by 10%.
*Wash only full loads in a dishwasher and if you must pre-rinse, do so with cold water. Letting dishes air
dry can save 10-30% of your total dishwashing energy costs.
*Wash only full laundry loads. Use hot water only for very dirty loads.
* A low-flow shower head can reduce your energy bill by 3%.
Refrigeration
*Turn on the .power saver" or .energy miser" switch in your refrigerator, if it has one, unless there is
~oisture build up on the outside of your refrigerator.
f.tUmit the number of times you open and close the refrigerator and don't overload it.
f.tVacuum the condenser coils on the bottom or back of your refrigerator twice a year--unplug it first!
I*Keep the refrigerator between 38-420F and the freezer between 0-50F.
ik Allow food to cool before putting it into the refrigerator.
*Defrost the freezer regularly.
(OVER)
Space Cooling
*Use drapes or blinds to keep the sun out. Arrange furniture to allow cool air to circulate.
*Set the thermostat between 74-780F in the summer.
*Close doors and windows when using a window air conditioner for one room; place such units on the
coolest side of the house.
Cooking
*Match your pan size with the size of the burner. Use Iidsl
*Refrain from preheating for dishes which cook more than an hour. Never preheat for more than 10
minutes.
*Plan oven use so that you can cook many dishes together. Don't open the oven door unless it Is
necessary.
*Use a microwave whenever possible as it is more energy efficient than conventional cooking.
Appliances
*Turn off appliances when you are through using them and keep them in good working order.
*Look for energy-saving features when buying a new appliance.
Lighting
*Use compact fluorescent lights. They use 75-80% less energy than incandescent lamps and last 13 times
longer.
*Turn off lights when not in use. Locate lamps where they get the most use. Use daylight whenever
possible!
References
The Alliance to Save Energy, Good for You. Good for the Planet: A Consumer's Guide to Enemy Efficient
Liahtinq, 1990.
The Alliance to Save Energy, The Pollute-less. Save-more Home Eneray StOry, DAMS Publishing, Inc.
Appalachian Power Company, SMART Enemy Savina Tips, American Electric Power, 1992.
Massachusetts Autobahn Society and Massachusetts Electric, Enemy Efficient Home Appliances Tips
Booklet.
The Southeastern Pennsylvania Energy Center, Tips for an Enemy Efficient Apartment, Philadelphia, PA.
The Virginia Division of Energy, The Virqinia Enemy Book: Proven Ways to Save Money in and Around Your
Home, October, 1984.
act Sheet # 7
ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN HOME CONSTRUCTION AND IN RETROFITS
The Bad News
I American Homes use approximately $40 billion worth of fuel and $75 billion worth of electricity.
80% of those homes use 35% to 50% more energy than necessary.
The U.S. wastes over $300 billion every year due to lack of insulation, inefficient refrigerators,
~ratty doors and other energy leaks. That's more than the entire U.S. military budget.
I An average house has five square feet of air leaks, which account for 30-40% of the heating and
pooling bill.
I Water heating is the second biggest household energy user. Heating showers uses about 1.5%
pf all U.S. electricity.
I Of 6,000,000 mortgage application loans taken out annually, only 2,000 to 3,000 utilize energy
~fficient mortgage program options. The reason is lack of education among realtors, bankers, lenders and
puilders.
he Good News
I From 1979-1986, the U.S. got over seven times as much new energy from savings as from all net
ircreased of supply, largely due to the millions of things many people did with caulk, duck tape, insulation,
tc.
I Cutting hot water use is easy, clean, painless and perhaps the quickest, least expensive way to
ave energy in the home.
I While ordinary light bulbs cost about a dollar at the check-out counter, over their short lite they
~pically cost six times more for electricity usage relative to fluorescent bulbs.
I The key to energy efficiency in new construction is super insulation.
An energy efficient mortgage makes housing more affordable by allowing the costs of energy
improvements to be included in the mortgage before the work commences, and by increasing the debt to
itlcome ratio from 28% to as high as 41 %.
I Appliances use 8% of household energy. When purchasing appliances looking for the yellow
I nergy efficiency rating label (EER), New commercially available refrigerators and freezers consume up to
( 0% less energy, while new TVs save 75%, computers save 95%
<Dvercoming Marketplace Barriers to Energy Efficiency in New Construction and Housing Retrofits
I Strengthening building codes nationwide.
Without federal or state mandates calling for tougher building standards, developers will continue
tp be reluctant to initiate conservation measures because of their expense. Therefore, utilities may have to
€ ncourage efficiency measures by paying for some (or all) of their installation. It also helps when the utility
r rovides services to developers and certifies energy efficiency techniques to improve the marketing
r rospects.
I Creating a uniform, fuel-neutral rating system for housing.
Creating Energy Service Companies (ESCO's), single centers that offer energy products, technical
ard financial services for consumers.
ICreating a national efficiency mortgage policy,
References
"Making Housing More Affordable Through Energy Efficiency." Summary of Proceedings, A Policv Forum
and Conference, October 4-6, 1989. Alliance to Save Energy, Washington, D.C.
"Breakthroughs in Energy Efficient Technologies." Southern Environmental law Center Fact Sheets, written
by Attorney Jeff Gleason, Charlottesville, Virginia
"Practical Home Energy Savings." Spring 1991, Rocky Mountain Institute, Volume VII, Number I, Boulder,
CO,
Home Energy/January/February 1992. Information on The National Association of Energy Efficient
Mortgage Service Companies, call 1-415-858-0890.
"Energy Efficiency Tips Make Every Day Earth Day." Virginia Department of Mines and Minerals publication.
1-800-552-3831, Richmond, VA.
Earth Day 1992, Building a Sustainable Energy Future, Virginia Department of Mines and Minerals
publication. Richmond, VA.
Fa t Sheet #8
ENERGY USE IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY
SI ould business and industry embrace energy efficiency?
Virginia Power estimates that promotion of energy efficiency would result in a 6% decrease in
el ctrical use. This would have saved 3.3 billion kilowatt hours of electricity in 1991.
A reduction in energy usage will save money paid for electricity and fuel, can increase productivity
wi h improvements to the workplace and enhance Industrial competitiveness, and may even improve the
10 al economy since the savings can be spent locally.
Energy efficiency is an important issue for small businesses. A study by the National Federation
of Independent Business indicated that a small company with $50,000 in annual sales spends four times as
m ~ch per sales dollar for energy as a company twenty times larger. It can thus be particularly cost effective
fo small businesses to reduce their energy costs.
Er ergy conservation saves money:
1. Indoor climate control accounts for approximately 53% of the electrical use in retail and office buildings.
U e of heat pumps, high-efficiency air conditioners, superwindows and room-by-room heating could result
in energy savings of 26-48%.
2. Improving boiler performance, reducing hot water temperatures, and installing hot taps which heat water
or demand at the point of use will reduce energy consumption for heating water by as much as 80%.
3. In a typical existing commercial building, approximately two-fifths of all electricity is used directly for
Iigrting. The cooling load required to compensate for the heat produced raises the percentage to greater
th n half. Fifty-five percent of the cost of lighting could be saved through cost-effective means, while 80-90%
cc uld be saved using state of the art technology.
4. Electric motors consume 65-70% of Industrial electricity and more than half the electricity generated In
th U.S. It was estimated In 1990 that the annual electricity bill for motors exceeds $90 billion, or about 2%
of he gross national product. Implementation of advanced technologies such as heat recovery and energy
m nagement control systems hold significant conservation potential for businesses. Improved motor
sy!>tems can run on about half the electricity, which amounts, in principle, to electricity savings equivalent
in he U.S. to about 80-190 billion kilowatts of power. The cost of these new highest efficiency motors can
uswally be recovered in 16 months,
Implementation of many of the energy saving practices does not result in fewer or inferior services.
Ne w devices can actually function better than the replaced equipment and may provide more pleasing light,
m pre reliable production and higher standards of comfort and control, resulting in greater productivity in the
we rkplace.
TE MPERATURE CONTROL
Use the properly sized heating and air-conditioning system. Utilize climate control system only during the
we rk day. Reduce thermostat settings in the winter and increase in the summer. Use natural ventilation
wt ere feasible.
IN ERIOR LIGHTING
Us~ more efficient light sources. Energy efficient ballasts and low watt florescent lamps reduce energy
co~sumption by two-thirds. Use task/display lighting, calibrating the amount of light necessary for the task.
Remove all unnecessary lamps, use natural light when and where possible, turn off fixtures in unoccupied
arE as.
(OVER)
WATER HEATING
Improve boiler performance. Reduce hot water temperature. Install hot taps which heat water on demand
at point of use.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Improve parking lot and security lighting by replacing with more efficient light type. Fluorescent and low
pressure sodium lamps are particularly cost effective, although fluorescent ballasts are less efficient when
exposed to extreme cold. Reduce wattage where possible. Control hours of use so that operating times
coincide with twilight hours until closing time.
Improve outdoor display sign lighting by Installing metal halides In place of Incandescents where quality
outdoor light is necessary for displays and signs. Reduce wattage levels in signs and fixtures. Turn off all
signs after closing.
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Insulate pipes and tanks. Repair water and steam leaks. Maintain lighting system, Maintain heat transfer
surfaces in boilers, refrigerators, and ducts regularly. Place weatherstripping and caulking around windows
and doors to minimize infiltration. Keep building In good repair.
WAREHOUSING AND DELIVERY
s
Reduce heat loss from open garage doors In warehouses. Use efficient lighting, heating, and cooling in
warehouse space. Improve truck maintenance, payload matching, and scheduling of deliveries.
REFRIGERATION
Set temperatures higher and replace worn refrigeration seals.
PLANT OPERATION
Implement advanced technologies such as heat recovery and energy management control systems. Install
properly sized, higher efficiency motors with adjustable-speed drives. Install superefficient appliances, which
can save 50 to 95 percent on electricity. Reschedule use of deferrable electrical equipment to non peak
hours and turn off when not needed. Reduce process heat loss.
References
IMR Corporation, Energy, Management, and Marketing Division, Reducina Enemy Costs in Small Businesses
(Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company, Inc., 1983), pp. 1-173.
Jon Pearson, Eneray Conservation in Small Business, (Maryland: University Press of America, Inc., 1984),
pp. 2-43.
Arnold P. Fickett, Clark W. Gellings and Amory B. Lovins, "Efficient Use of Electricity", Scientific American,
September 1990, pp. 65-74.
Center for Information Sharing, How to Reduce Enemy Costs in Your Buildina, (Boston, MA: Center for
Information Sharing, 1983).
Virginia Electric and Power Company, Eneray Efficiency at Work, (Richmond, VA: Virginia Electric and Power
Company, 1991).
Gary Hicks and Dwayne Marx, Office of Energy Efficiency, Virginia Power.
Robert Buderi and Emily T. Smith, "Conservation Power", Business Week, Sept.16, 1991, pp.86-92,
jl;d.9L3
,/3 J/ /1(~~ r)
r
~
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PE HTEL
COMMISSI NER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND. 23219
"., - ?~"""'''''''''''~-'''-..,,-__..,..~, ...~".'..._. o. .
November 5, 1993
~ ;
.'-,' ."'''''.~~',.7' '"""'~""""'-o ,.",.."'-".._'_"'o<""".__.....""'..~,~.,....,""~.'.
ounty Boards of Supervisors
Board Members:
Attached is a copy of the revised Six-Year Improvement
rogram approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board at
heir monthly meeting on October 21.
The Board has considered and approved changes to the Program
ccasioned by Governor Wilder's Economic stimulus Package. As a
esult of these improvements, a limited number of allocations
ere adjusted to provide funding for those projects over the
eriod covered by the program. During the process there were no
'mprovements moved or delayed as a result of these adjustments.
The revision also includes changes to the Hampton Roads Area
ongestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program to
onform to changes made by the local Metropolitan Planning
rganization.
As a result of the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation
fficiency Act of 1991, the Federal Transportation Enhancement
rogram was established. After a lengthy application and review
rocess by the Transportation Enhancement Advisory Committee and
he Commonwealth Transportation Board's Environmental Committee,
he Board approved a total of 37 projects out of 219 applications
or the first round of Enhancement funding.
The Board also gave approval to the Safety Improvement
rogram which includes projects selected from a statewide
riority list of hazard elimination improvements and rail-highway
rade crossings. These improvements represent the first
election under the ISTEA initiative for a new safety program.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
~ -.
-2-
The Route 58 corridor Development Program was revised to
how all improvements utilizing both bond funds or highway
onstruction allocations. This will help to better define our
rogram to improve the Route 58 corridor across the Commonwealth.
Your interest in our transportation system is appreciated.
ldf~oner
ttachment
C: The Honorable John G. Milliken
/1 (,;2, -9 ",1
~3, III 7( .s~/ I )
r;-'nf-----
, R"
i" It; fr! .. -~
: I:i r-t,~_lQ__\!,_{!. /0'
: .'j 'i
November 9, 1993
L
. .-- J
,:Ot\ROOFS !
'''-- _-UPERvISORS:l
......-...J
1000-002-246, M501
Mill Creek Industrial Park
MS. ~o Higgins
Engi~eering Department
Coun y Office Building
401 ~clntire Road
Char ottesville, VA 22902
Dear Ms. Higgins:
This
agre~ment
will find
lett~r to
adviSe the
is to advise that the Department has approved the industrial access
for the above captioned project dated September 1, 1993. Enclosed you
a copy with original signatures for your files. I am by copy of this
Ms. Ella Carey, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, requesting that she
board of the approval of this agreement.
With the approval of the agreement, dedication of the right of way' for the
indu trial access road, the addition of Southern Parkway into the secondary system
and posting of the appropriate guarantee fee all conditions for expenditures of
thes~ funds have been satisfied. VDOT funded work under this project has been
comp eted and we await the completion of work which remains the county and
deve oper's responsibility. Please advise when this work has been completed so that
the Department can take over complete maintenance of Route 1000.
Yours truly,
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DSR/ mk
encl( sure
cc: Ms. Ella Carey
R. W. Tucker
D. R. Askew
Hugh Adams
...
.
~,
P.O. Box 334
Belcamp, Maryland
410-575-7412
I) -. /.:1. - 93-
:'/:"5.) / / 7 (:S~ 1.2 )
21017
,\[5C '- f-4lf'.J/\(<~1; fl.:. Scr\VlCE'S, If'X
Nc vember 8, .1993
r'~ ^...~.... ~,lt n WI
_J
CL:-iRO OF SUPEHVIS U ,L:.:
M . Bob Richardson
S~vran Bank, N.A.
P~st Office Box 26904
R chmond, Virginia 23261
R~: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.)
D~ar Mr. Richardson:
E ~closed please find the Bond prog ram Repor t and Monthly Repor t
P ~r suan t to Sect ion 7 (a)' of the Deed Rest r ict ions for the month
o October 1993.
IF you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
a 410-575-7412.
S ncerely,
~kkt1~(.~" \-1Y"[ "JvVL
S~eila H. M~ynih~n"' :P'
P oject Monitor
/~hm
'e~closures
cr: ~"~~~'t.;t"",~..f1t1,~_,~.~
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
I
I
aONO f'ROGRAM REPORT
,.. .
Mon'h October Yea' ~
rbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts,) 051-35371
Proptt1y: Pro;.c1 .:
loc.tion: harlottesville, VA Number 01 Unit. 66
SubmlUtd t y: Loretta Wyatt November 5, 1993 Effective 10/31/93
M.t\>r c.Te
Total Occupied 66
Bond Occupied 18
I. LOwt" INCOME
The 101l0wI g units t\.~ t)eoen d~s'gn<d as "tower Income" unlls
1 A bor Crest Dr 21 Eleanor Blair 41
1 61.
4 A bor Crest Dr 22 Beverly T. Lane 42
2 62.
3 5 A bor Crest Dr 23 Margaret L. Mawyer 43 63,
4 9 A bor Crest Dr 24 Virginia Burton 44 &C.
5 12 A bor Crest Dr 25 G. Robert Stone 45
e~,
6 14 A bor Crest Dr 26 Evelyn Dover 46 ee.
7 . 15 A bor Crest Dr 27 Jane Wood 47 e7.
a 20 A bor Crest Dr 2a Evelyn Ma~deville 43 61
9 24 A bor Crest Dr 29 Gertrude Breen 49
H.
10 30 A bor Crest Dr 30 Ma.ry Cox Allen 50 70,
76 Alrbor Crest Dr 31 Barbara Datz ~1
11 71.
12. 78 Alrbor Crest Dr 32 Ernest M. Nease 52 72
lJ 84 A\r.bor Crest Dr :n Juanita Boliek 53 73
90 A\r.bor Crest Dr 34 Betty B. Ell iott 5<e
14 74.
I!> 92 Afrbor Crest Dr 3~ Dorothy H. Reese 5~
75.
16 94 Alrbor Crest Dr 36 Sarah E. Fischer ~
78
II 102 Alrbor Crest Dr :'\1 Anne Lee Bullard ':;>1 77.
106 Prbor Crest Dr J3 Katherine T. Nowlen
lIS '::>&. 7e.
19 39 59 71.
~IO 40 60 80.
T t\e cr'An~s "0m pI ~VIO\lS repC'll' r~"~cled in It\. .bov. hsleng ".
Oelellona
Add 111 one
t- 76 Ar or Crest Dr H Catherine S. Rahming 76 Arbor Crest Dr Barbara Datz
1 . , ,.
2 12 2 12.
J 13 3 13.
I 4 14 4. 14.
5 15 $ 15.
6 16 6 16
7 17 7 17,
. 18 e. 11..
. 19 , 1t,
10 20 10, 20.
.'
. .
Effective October 31, 1993
MONTHLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 7(a) OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS
TO: ABG As'sociates, Inc.
300 E.I.CI'nba.rd Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
RE: Hydraulic Road Apartments - Aroor Crest Apa.ri::Irents
Charlottesville, Virginia
Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions (the "Deed
Restrictions"), as defined in an Indenture of Trust dated as of
April 1, 1983, between the Industrial Development Authority of
Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Authority"), and your bank, as
trustee, the undersigned authorized representative of
Richmond-Albemarle Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited
Partnership (the "Purchaser-), hereby certifies with respect to
the operation and management of Hydraulic Road Apartments,
Charlottesville, Virginia, (the "Project"), that as of the date
shorwn below:
1) The number of units in the Project occupied by
lower income tenants is 18 .
2) The number of units in the Project unoccupied and
held available for Lower Income Tenants is -0-
.
3) The number of units rented and the number of units
held available for rental other than as described in
(1) and (2) is 48
4) The percentage that the number of units described in
(1) and (2) hereof constitute of the total number of
units in the Project is 27% .
5) The information contained in this report is true,
accurate and correct as of the date hereof.
6) As of the date hereof, the Purchaser is not in
default under any covenant or agreement contained
in the Deed Restrictions or in an Agreement of Sale
dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Authority and
the Purchaser.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Report as of
November 5, 1993
RICHMOND-ALBEMARLE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia
limited partnership
~ d-
By: ~~) 7~~..d6
Au horized Rep esentative
ABS 7lACT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of
. Vir -. 'a, at the November 2, 1993 General Election, for:
// - Io?-?.i.
. fJj//l(~- /
/Jl... 8 EM .4 eLL
o \V m rm
R~~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA
N.... ofCanfl,.,..
Total Vola
......,
(1" l'ipJw)
MARY SUE TERRY
GEORGE F. ,,\T.'f:.EN
NANCY B. SPANNAUS
PH-It... BELl SAte, 0
-oON J3EY€t<-
:JOE:. 'I & T7 A F=kCc.O
}) ON IrL [) J) u.. c I<..
SALlY JAc.1<50tJ
::T. 8/9 ~ R. € -r -r ::J01tJ E.S
11M. L ItlDS7R...0I11
(conHnw 011 ,...,.rn.Uk, 'tn..MII)
ndersigned Electoral Board, upon emmi1l4tion of the official records deposited with the Clerk of the
ourt of the election held on November 2, 1993, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct
Abstrac ofVote8 cast at said election for Governor of Virginia..
~ day of November, 1993,
r
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Secretary
~LL.'~ .:.
c/.c-~}/
f,.. 0 V<? v-...
~/~
Secretary, Electoral Board
GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA
November 2, 1993
General Electio'h
Page Z. of ~
County/City of A L oE/M. ft-1C-.~L
.. ".N.... dfc.a41da1a
2Wol Vola
BtIoftHd
a,,'iprell)
RofUllT cS. /YlcftDfti115
:s -r:.~ VEM m E€.(<.S
It N DR.EtJ 1/t.€.A 5 A L. 17 ,
DONAL.D $( 1115
&rJ c5A1 E-A-h
B t2.-u..e € ..sPR ItV () S 7 €.€tJ
/r1~y &E ~I?'f 5tft.( Y T ~ft5.
S A-L. L Y T I--I-e--rz,tll.5
:::T~ H-rJ E. 0eA V ER.5
CftR,L E:.. ~ ILL I fT1t1.:\
#0 I-l E. OF- TiJ-C A 13 () ve.-
I
,
I
J
(
I
I
3
I
I
~
ABS. RACT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of Ih B~ Il1 A-eu.:..
. 'Virgi .a, at the November 2, 1993 General Election, for:
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA
Nomn ofCaatUdat..
2'oIaI Vol..
&o.iHd
allPlprea)
DONALD S. BEYER. JR.
MICHAEL P. FARRIS
L.IfRRy ~rJ
8A-I2.BI1i!.,A &11J~H
eDDy GAL TotJ
R 0 q tc:It !-i14- '- '-
S,4LLY ~'S
KR.. us ;'( THE.. (IL ow;.)
IlIOIt/E o,c. Ttf€. A-e DyE
H-~te'l T,4YLO~
(OOlltin... Oil ...H.... .u., 'f"..ad)
We, the ndersigned Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records deposited with the Clerk of the
Circuit ourt of the election held on November 2, 1993, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct
Abstrac of Votes cast at said election for Lieutenant Governor of Virginia,
~ d4y of November, 1993.
r our hands this
Vice Chairman
~a~~- &um~
Chairman
A copy te 141:
r/~"<'u cJ/c-rC~ p~ Secrel4ry, Electoral Board
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA
County/City of /k.-B €At ~ L-C
November 2, 1993
General Election
Page d-- of ~
N_.o(c-didaIa
Totol Vot..
RftdNfl
(Irs lIiIu,...)
5At.L'{ T~A-5
~
AB TRACT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of A L /3~1
ViI: . . a, at the November 2, 1993 General Election, for: '.'..' r. j ~ I!
'" n,. 1 n 'Ifm ~. I
~. ~ 1 j ?'\ ,: i
; LJL j ~, , , ,
~
\ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATroRNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA .
.
N__of~
,..
2'0101 Vola
&oriwcI
(In FItrurw-J
WILLIAM D. DOLAN III
JAMES S. "Jim" GILMORE m
A1 , ~s trI OLL 'I 13 t r:-1UJ"" Ceo l.E: T, VA,
SCOT; 6 OO~/IIAN
Y 04 E. R HA--L L.
NONE OF TH-€. A60VE..
SA- L L. '1 TH-O M AS
.
(conlin... on rev.,....UN, ifn._d)
We, the 1'Idersigned Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records deposited with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court of the election held on November 2, 1993, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct
Abs of Votes cast at said election for Attorney General of Virginia.
.
I g f( day of NOl/ember, 1993.
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Secretary
rx/~~- J)/~Y' /?/~
Secretary, Electoral Board
ABS CT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of A L6 gin ~
Vir : .a, at the November 2, 1993 General Election, for:
MEMBER, HOUSE OF DELEGATES
S 1-- District
N..... ole-dill.....
In ITC HELL. VA-N VA HeE5
IYI (C-H /tEL ()J. D. 6R-OC4JtJ
:It...ElJE SMITH
SALLY TH-OIJ1AS
2'oIaI v...
lWod-.I
a..l1Ipra)
(oonnn... 011 reM.....w.. ",.--d)
w~ the igned Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records deposited with the Clerk of the
ourt of the election held on Nouember 2, 1993, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct
Abstra.c of Vote. cast at said election for the above office,
r our hands this L/ f( day of November, 1993.
Chairman
/5 :k.
~V?-~
Secreta.r;y
./J
/c.?'-va. 4 ';'
.
J, ~~u~_ d? ~
0:. V--v~ ~/ eL'Z~n_.
SecretaT)', Electoral Board
ABS CT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of A- L BE- tV1 A-eL e:...
"a, at the November 2, 1993 General Election, for:
MEMBER, HOUSE OF DELEGATES
5 ~ District
N__ o(CMulWa...
bM (D S, (!ot..E
PE.TEfC. 7. kJA-Y
bAV Ii) CV.4t...LA-CE. &Mf.LENSHIP
SOB ])y L A-tJ
7::>, D ~oc..K G IceE:tJ
T, IV) L l N DS TR.t:>M
/1/ 0 A1 €.. oP 7H-E Ik~ vc:.
IQ olllltUJ R Itm l3 D
SA-L L 'I THO 111 liS
2"oIal Vola
1lMwINttI
an FIprn)
(oontin... on Nile,... aIM, "n_.ad)
ndersign,ed Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records deposited with the Clerk of the
ourt of the election held on November 2, 1993, do hereby certify that the aboue is a true and correct
Abstrac of Votes cast at Baid election for the aboue office.
tJ. +A. day of Nouember, 1993.
Chairman
Vice Cha.irTnCln
a-lf.:::... Secretary
~~~UKLP ~~~r-- c/?~,
"v
Secretary, Electoral Board
ABS . CT OF VOTES cast in the County of k 6E?AlA M?- f.,.E-
.a, at the November 2, 1993 General Election, for:
MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
(l t+A-R. w~ rc fJ,j ( L. L.l: District
...
N-. ",C-~,..
'DA1ItD P. Eow~RrntTtJ
AIVYBoJ)'-! Et-SE.
qEoR.GE A, OEL.LA-GIt-NNIt
'lX<, (! tMR. LE-S In I JOffAl SlIIJ 1IL
:Jt1C1< 1<, R K
(!. A-e. n:R.. In 8. Y U<.5
H ()tA) ftf(J) P A-R...s 0 ~
~ottll+1-O Rfbl1'80
SI+-L';I I Ho
2'.., Vola
~
(1" l1Ipra)
(CJOntUaw 011 lWHrH.,., i("..ull)
We, the ndersigned Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records ckposited with the Clerk of the
Circuit ourt of the election held on November 2, 1993, do hereby certif.l that the above is a true and correct
Abstrac of Votes cast at election and do, therefore, cktermine and ckclare that the followi118 person(s) has
(have) ,., ceived the greatest number of votes cast for the above office in said election:
Dftv ID p, BOWl: RmftfJ
'f He day of November, 1993.
Chairm4n
. e Chair17l4n
t?k Secretary
j1
;i. . .' '
c ;t;,~?l-. ~/~
Secretary, Electoral Board
/_ c',t-z.~~~
MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
{! HAi!-LOT7Lc&./(Lc..E- District
County of A B €.M f'rt:..U':..
November 2, 1.993
General Election
Page .;t. of :L
N".... of~.
2'oIol Vol..
~
(1" lIIpra)
--r~I4.5
SIkLIE- THOMt4.5
SA-L L Y T ffO/l1 ,4...5
'sHIRLEY T~tnfl.5
S us,Lht) T f-UJf111t-5
cl..
I
'10
;;L
-l
ABS 7lACT OF VOTES cast in the County of --.i1--Lrse4lll A1C:-t-C-
. Vir. a, at the November 2, 1993 General Election, for:
MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
::::r f\C... /<. :J OU ri T -r District
N..... otc...d.dG,..
c.1 ~Lo77C Y. fIu/1l1 PHR.'.j
A-AlYBODY
!lNYONE.. EI-S€-
CDW ft-/U) &tr /1J
&<SELL e.,tt-SSEL.L
BILL E:D~€.R-rotJ
~1ttJ GR..O,SS M ~
KR.l't-lYIct<.
Tt mOTH\{ L( N.D.57R.olV1
2'oIaI Vola
.....
(111 PIpra)
(ooratUaw 011 reD.",..IM, "ranaG)
We, the ndersigned Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records deposited with the Clerk of the
Circuit ourt of the election held on Nouember 2, 1993, do hereby certify th.a.t the above is a true and correct
Abstract of Votes cast at election and do, therefore. determine and declare that the following person(s) has
(ha,ve) r ceived the greatest number of votes cast for the above office in said election:
{! H-A-eL 0 77 ~ Y. IIu 111 P Hf<.1 .5
r our hands this
//It
I do.y of November, 1993.
Chairman
ICe Chairman
~-C/4~ .k K71.-i'-l-"L.
Secretary
/J
/ ,.
c:z;; C~~~-e-:2-r
~/;~~ ,0~
Secretary, Electoral Board
MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
.::r ACI<. :T({)t.LE Tr District
County of fhBem IH2..Le..
November 2, 199~
General Election
Page J... of 2
N..... ofc-4ldGle.
Total Vol..
B."'"
(1n l'Iprn)
:f rrN E:... (YI ft:DD fA- X
:JOHN e I (Y7 trDD U)<
DCX<.q IYl 0 ((R1.5
~,4-R. rEf<. /YJ Y ER S I.LL
QAYNcLL Si#rr<p
PATTY TH&111fl":S
SA-LL y TI-fO/YIA-5
I
I
I
;)-.-
I
I
/1
ABS ,RACT OF VOTES cast in the County of A-C6EMIHZLL
. Vir" 'a, at the November 2, 1993 General Election, for:
MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Slim u,E L /11 ( L '- € ~ District
N..... ofCaJulw.,..
2'oIal v...
..,.."
(l..11Iprn)
H, ef'rR.TER. In YE~.s ]I[
'])ftFFY blA~ I<.
~ftLL'1 .:JOHN SON
IYlAR y
54-LL Y IYlILLE-1e.,
~ l. 'f IY/ oR-~ A-1tJ
IlIMC!Y SPMNfA.5
IfIAR.Y SuE' TifYLOI2..
SfrtL- y 74VL oR
(conllnwon NHrN.UN, if.....fl)
We, the ndersigned Electoral Board, upon examination of the officia.l records deposited with the Clerk of the
Circuit ourt of the election held on November 2, 1993, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct
Abstrac of Votes cast at election and do, therefore, determine and declare that the followiTll/ person(s) has
(have) ,., ceived the greatest number of votes cast for the above office in said election:
5-M.L y IHoMA:5
f(
if day of November, 1993.
~
C/C<' 7't:'4:l.J' -;::;,,~-~
ChainntJn
Vice Chairman
c~'\
Secretary
A~<<U-U> / J/(-wv-- A4
,r-'
Secretary, Electoral Board
MEMBER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
2J1tm Ue;L tn ILI-C:R., District
County of ABE-M fHC.L-E:-
November 2,1993
.
General Election
Page ;)... of J....
N_.of~.
2'oIol VoI_
Be-"-l
(In FlpraJ
In A-R. Y (~A-:5
!1IA-NC'( THeJMfT5
SII-LL y 71+0(1-1 A..5
SUSAN It+oMA-S
SUE.. (HOff/50/-'
YES
I
~
rJ.JOt 3 ?
I
(
I
AB TRACT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of /tLBE:M ff-eLE-
'Vir . .a, at the November 2, 1993 General Election, for:
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DIRECTOR
I H-<Y"l11As. :JE:.r::F€R.S{).,,) District
N.... ofeanfllfl.fllu
In A RGft~E 711 C. 1-/, DW(?! 4S
~TEV€.A1 G. fYI€.EK. 5
E 1:)(/<J f'r(Cf) It ( S~ I+A- ~ t R.
A-DA-/JI\ ft€dftTE:
B '-t. 7 T - fklt..D
RU:_J( r!. HI LD5
..::r. K \ I I 8~B I, Do 88.5
/YIft~ ITA (!. fl. bou C) (f\-S
DO AJ A-t.....b Due K.
IYl R.S, /Yle G I tJ tV 1:S
2WaI VGIa
llHe'-cI
(l..~
8) J.q,
.
/D,01S
'IJJ.3~
I
I
(
I
I
I
I
(cUllllUaw 011 IWNrN .Ia, If...-cI)
We, the ndersi8ned Electoral Board, upon examination of the offici4l records deposited with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court of the election held on November 2, 1993, de hereby certify toot the above is a true and correct
Ab.trac o/Vote. cast at said election for Soil and Water Conservation District Director..
our hands this
LfIi day of November, 1993.
COOu-man
Secretary
c:L' . .'
Jat;-u.Ll. ~~;,--.. ~/~
Secretary, Electoral Board
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DIRECTOR
THOMPr5 .JUF-ERS 0 ttJ District
County/City of Ii '- J3 EM Ae L c.
November 2, 1993
General' Election
Page ~ of ..:L
N_.of~
Srt-LL,/ IYI (LLEI?
IV ONE:. tJ.F (HE. A-l!Jo fiE:...
S~LY
~tTL L Y 7ll Y LOR...
TH-O f1I/ ft..s
((//tR-Y T~IVlA.5
$, T H<J IYl ,4-5
5TLL IE.. TI+c>M A-S
Sftt... L Y T t+() M fl-::S
~ fiLL Y H t TH 0 {l;1/1-..5
;)4t..LY THOMPSDN
I( fj T(G{ IIJ A- T H-R-ftll c:. .5
SA-Ll.. Y 70 M A- ..s
~OtlEI2AJoR.. ~GL/b tJIL~
2'oIaI Vol..
~
(l..~
/
J...
I
I
3
(
(
I
83
C;;Z
I
I
(
I
A)J$TRA. r OF VOTES cast in the County / City of
at the spec I election held on N 0(/ e:.m F3 ~
fh-BUIt ~LE:
2...
, Virginia,
, 19 q 3 , on the following question or proposition:
ffft-LL THe. IYlE-THo.D ore. SE.-LLe TINC) (we. .5eHoOL
BoMb BE. c..H-1'tN~ED FR..QN( ttPPDINTI11E,vT l!>Y
THE:. ft-LBEIVI ML-~ C!lJtu./ry ~OItR.D OF SdlPERvlsoRS
To DIRECT ~L€C-TION By rHi::. VOTERS?
Total Votes
Received
(In F1aura)
FOR (Yes)
/~/-:jJ.O
AGAINST (No)
S,Q8/
We, the u dersigned Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records deposited with the Clerk of the Circuit
Court oft eelection on #OVClt1I!.E...R.. L , /9 '15, do herebycertijy that theaboveisa true and correct
Abstract Votes cast at said election for and against the question or proposition set forth above.
Given un r our hands this tj.ti day of ;V(!)(/E:A1/3€1<. , 19!1..:},
A copy teste: Chairman
-7 Vice Chairman
/ C/..<;.A4.~~' Jc. *V-C~ /?/L Secretary
./7 J /!=<.<~ ~/I~
r
~ C:2u~ Secretary, Electoral Board
~
~
b;.s+ Il/II/')?
Q~. /l1'7(~,IS)
C
He,
;
Fp
M E M 0 RAN DUM
From:
~I
Forrest Kerns.-/ IL..
? ,...::
'\ \'i',~/
\ ~ ) r---;~>'
':~~~
\~~
To:
Robert Tucker
David Benish
Date:
November 12, 1993
Re:
Crozet Crossing Status Report
Sales. As of this date, there are eleven families
living in their Crozet Crossing homes. There are contracts
for fourteen additional homes in process and five homes are
not under contract. Two buyers have withdrawn their
contract to purchase in the past week because of personal
reasons. We will need to have another meeting of the
Selection Committee soon to qualify additional families.
Construction. The fence on the south side of the property
is currently under construction with expected completion by
November 26th. The cost for the fence is approximately
$6400.
Construction Financing. Our last payment to
Alexander/Nicholson is due on November 22 for $53,041.19.
This amount will be paid from a draw on the VHDA
construction loan after a closing is completed.
Thanks,
Forrest
",",:'1,....; "'( ''''''r'
ft;'f",},,j~;..., ~ ;
.... r. :
;.:l..~
;.~
it-FOR
u'
~;~l '; no;': ~
100 Court Square Annex, Suite E . Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 . 804/979-0967
t
I'
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 2.1, AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS
IN SECTION 2.1-4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that Section 2.1-4
of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle be amended and reenacted
b the addition of a subsection (u) to be known as the "Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural and
F restal District" described as follows:
(u) The district known as the "Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural and Forestal District"
consists of the following described properties: Tax map 13, parcels 1, 4, 8, 10 and
12.
* * * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct of an ordinance
a opted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
N vember 17, 1993.
~ 11a vJ C ({1lf1
~k. Board of County sU7J visors
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 2.1 , AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS
IN SECTION 2.1-4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that Section 2.1-4
of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle be amended and reenacted
b the addition of a subsection (v) to be known as the "North Fork Moorman's River Agricultural and
F restal District" described as follows:
(v) The district known as the "North Fork Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal
District" consists of the following described properties: Tax Map 4, parcels 1, 2, 3 and
4.
* * * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct of an ordinance
a opted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
N vember 17, 1993.
~/ ~ "
~, . . I II
" (( ~'G L {Ult-
ei.{"d of County s"Jervisors
/)- /0< - 9 <-~
9,;3, 1117. & C/J"
(.J tit
~SU
{,.s- I
~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
. ,,-- f:~ -fr~ lli 0 W . rn fnf
r~~-.993 l~j
:OARD OF SUPERVISORS
M ORANDUM
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner ~
November 10, 1993
Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural/Forestal District
North Fork Moormans River Agricultural/Forestal District
Addition to III To Sugar Hollow Agricultural/Forestal District
Addition III to Kinloch Agricultural/Forestal District
T e Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on November 9, 1993,
u animously recommended approval of the above-noted requests. Attached please
f nd staff reports which outline the request. Please note that the Albemarle
C unty Board of Supervisors will review these requests and receive public
c mment at their November 17. 1993 meeting.
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
S/jcw
e following factors must be considered by the Planning Commission and the
visory Committee and at any public hearing when a proposed district is being
c nsidered:
MARY JOY SCALA
OCTOBER 18, 1993
NOVEMBER 9, 1993
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
The purpose of an agricultural/forestal district is "to conserve
d protect and to encourage the development and improvement of the
Commonwealth's agricultural/forestal lands for the production of foods and
other agricultural and forestal products..." and "to conserve and protect
ricu1tural and forestal lands as valued natural and ecological resources
ich provide essential open space for clean air sheds, watershed protection,
i1d1ife habitat, as well as for aesthetic purposes."
ctors to Consider:
1. The agricultural and forestal significance of land within the district
and in areas adjacent thereto;
2. The presence of any significant agricultural lands or significant
forestal lands within the district and in areas adjacent thereto that
are not now in active agricultural or forestal production;
3. The nature and extent of land uses other than active farming or forestry
within the district and in areas adjacent thereto;
4. Local developmental patterns and needs;
5. The Comprehensive Plan and, if applicable, the zoning regulations;
6 The environmental benefits of retaining the lands in the district for
agricultural and forestal uses; and
7 Any other matter which may be relevant.
E fects of a District.
1 The proposed district provides a community benefit by conserving and
protecting farmlands and forest; environmental resources such as
watersheds, air quality, open space, wildlife habitat; and scenic and
historic resources.
1
..
The State Code stipulates that the landowner receive certain tax
benefits*, and restrictions on public utilities and government action
(such as land acquisition and local nuisance laws) to protect the
agricultural/forestal use of the land. In exchange, the landowner
agrees to not develop his property to a "more intensive use" during the
specified number of years the district is in effect.
Since Albemarle County currently permits all types of use value assessment, a
istrict designation may not provide any additional real estate tax
eductions. Land in a district is protected from special utility assessments
or taxes.
3. The State Code stipulates that, "Local ordinances, comprehensive plans,
land use planning decisions, administrative decisions and procedures
affecting parcels of land adjacent to any district shall take into
account the existence of such district and the purposes of this
chapter. II The district may have no effect on adj acent development by
right, but could restrict proposed rezonings or uses by special use
permit which are determined to be in conflict with the adjacent
agricultural/forestal uses. Districts must now be shown on the official
Comprehensive Plan map each time it is updated.
4. In general, a district may have a stabilizing effect on land use. The
property owners in the district are making a statement that they do not
intend to develop their property in the near future, and that they would
like the area to remain in the agricultural and forestal uses. Adjacent
property owners may be encouraged to continue agricultural uses if they
do not anticipate development of adjacent lands.
nificant Land Not in A ricultura1 Fo estal Prod ction' The use value
a sessment program is a good indicator of the actual use of the property.
ur of the five parcels are enrolled in the program, with approximately 300
a res in agriculture and 460 acres in forestry. The other parcel is not
e rolled in the use value program, but is being used for pasture and timber.
FENCE MOUNTAIN DISTRICT:
The proposed district is located on Pasture Fence Mountain west of
unt Fair off Rte. 756. Access is a right-of-way along the North Fork
River.
The proposed district contains 870.420 acres in five parcels.
The proposed time period is ten years.
ricu1tural and Forestal Si nificance' Land in the proposed district is
ing used for forestry and agriculture (pasture).
nd Use Other Than A riculture
p oposed district. There is one
are no dwellings in the
2
~
d" This area is mountainous, remote,
populated. Four parcels are adjacent to the Shenandoah
This area is well suited for enrollment in a district.
Designated Rural Area in the
RA, Rural Areas. The nearest Growth Area is
rozet Community, a distance of about 6~ miles south. Preservation of
gricultural/forestal resources is a major goal of the Plan. The Plan also
calls for the active promotion and support of voluntary techniques such as
gricultural/forestal districts. The Open Space Plan recommends mountain
protection for this area above the 1000 foot contour (elevations in the
proposed district range from 1120 to 2840 feet). The Open Space Plan also
ecognizes North Fork Moorman's River which is a natural trout stream.
roperty in this proposed district is visible from the Skyline Drive, a State
S enic Highway. Part of the proposed district drains to the Sugar Hollow
servoir, and all of the district is within the South Fork Rivanna River
tershed.
vironmental Benefits' Environmental benefits include protection of ground
d surface water, drinking water supplies, wildlife habitat, critical slopes,
d open space.
Staff recommends approval of the district as proposed.
Committee Recommendation' The Advisory Committee at its meeting on
tober 18, 1993, unanimously recommended approval of the district as proposed
inutes attached). (The Committee did not see the application for Tax Map
, Parcel 12.)
annin Commission Recommendation' The Albemarle County Planning Commission,
a its meeting on November 9, 1993, unanimously recommended approval of the
d"strict as proposed.
3
.
.......""......-.-.............................................----...............................,..."...............".................................................."......._-..-.....
....".....,..............................................-.--.......__.-...-..................."."......_-..,...."........-................................-............._,................
.............,...........................,...............,.-..............---.................................,................................................-...................-...................
........................,-................................-..............-......................................-..................................................-..............-.................
...........,...............................................................-........................................................................................................-................
.........................).....<...u.................uH(.",.un.iEfUciiiilUi.i"d::.i..~ti.i.mlct>.<............
TM/PARCEL TOTAL ACREAGE LAND USE ACREAGE OWNER DWELLINGS
AG FOR
13-1 156.040 40.000 116.040 Meredith R. & Mary B. Shifflett 0
(cabin)
13-4 n.ooo n.ooo Meredith R. & Mar B. Shifflett 0
13-8 390.000 260.000 130.000 White Hall Hunt Club 0
Inc. c/o Ra JOnes
13-10 139.030 -------- 137.030 Carroll D. or Doroth w. Smith 0
.
Soil
Conservation
Service
401 McIntire Rd
Charlottesville VA
22902-4596
0:
Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner, Albemarle count,,;
J. Gordon Yager, District Conservationist, S~~ ~~ ~:7d~
\ .e1 n/~ . /?-
Soils Report on Agricultural/Forestal Districts ~~
Pasture Fence
rom:
e:
August 26, 1993
oils are classified into eight capability classes with Class I
eing the best and Class VIII having the most limitations for
gricultural uses. The following table gives a breakdown of-"
apability Classes for the district.
Capability Class
II
III
IV
VI
VII
asture Fence
1%
99%
he following table gives the percentage of the addition that is
uitable for cropland, hayland, pasture and forestry.
Suitable
for
Cropland
Suitable
for
Grassland
& Forestry
Suitable
for
Forestry
asture Fence
0%
0%
100%
large percentage of this addition is suitable for grassland and
gricultural uses.
o
The Soil Conservation Service
IS an agency of the
Department of Agnculture
Plan and Zonin Re ulations' Designated Rural Area in the
Plan and zoned RA, Rural Areas. The nearest Growth Area is
ozet Community, a distance of about 9 miles south. Preservation of
a riculturaljforestal resources is a major goal of the Plan. The Plan also
c lis for the active promotion and support of voluntary techniques such as
a riculturaljforestal districts. The Open Space Plan recommends mountain
otection for this area above the 1000 foot contour (elevations in the
oposed district range from 2,200 to 3,000 feet). The Open Space Plan also
cognizes North Fork Moorman's River which is a natural trout stream.
operty in this proposed district is visible from the Skyline Drive, a State
enic Highway. All of the proposed district drains to the Sugar Hollow
servoir, and all of the district is within the South Fork Rivanna River
tershed.
West of Brown's Cove.
The proposed district contains 270.48 acres in four parcels.
The proposed time period is ten years.
ricultura and Forestal S
eing used for forestry.
Land in the proposed district is
od ction' The use value
of the property. All
Other Than
district. There is one hunting
are no dwellings in the
Needs' This area is mountainous, remote,
populated. All four parcels are adjacent to the
This area is well suited for enrollment in a
vironmental Benefits. Environmental benefits include protection of ground
d surface water, drinking water supplies, wildlife habitat, critical slopes,
d open space. There is a large wetland area in this district.
Staff recommends approval of the addition as proposed.
Committee Recommendation' The Advisory Committee at its meetirlg on
recommended approval of the district as proposed
attached).
d
The Albemarle County Planning Commission,
9, 1993, unanimously recommended approval of the
4
r
..
TM/PARCEL TOTAL ACREAGE LAND USE ACREAGE (UlER DWELLINGS
AG FOR
4-1 52.000 52.000 Clarence H. & Elizabeth 0
E. Jones (cabin)
4-2 130.000 130.000 White Hall Hunt Club, 0
Inc c/o Ra Jones
4-3 80.480 80.480 Clarence H. & Elizabeth 0
E. Jones
4-4 8.000 8.000 Clarence H. & Elizabeth 0
E. Jones
Soil
Conservation
Service
401 McIntire Rd
Charlottesville VA
22902-4596
0:
Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner, Albemarle counfr'
J. Gordon Yager, District Conservationist, ~~~ ~
Soils Report on Agricul tural/Forestal Distri~ts ___ / /:'-7"
North Fork Moormans River
e:
August 26, 1993
oils are classified into eight capability classes with Class I
eing the best and Class VIII having the most limitations for
gricultural uses. The following table gives a breakdown of
apability Classes for the district.
Capability Class
II
III
IV
VI
VII
orth Fork
oorman's River
5%
18%
77%
he following table gives the percentage of the addition that is
uitable for cropland, hayland, pasture and forestry.
Suitable
for
Cropland
Suitable
for
Grassland
& Forestry
Suitable
for
Forestry
orth Fork
oormans River
0%
0%
100%
he 5% Class IV soil is a wetland.
~
The Soil Conservation ServIce
is an agency of the
Department of Agroculture
~
'----
/
/
/
. '"
~ '---- J,
)
/
I / / _.n.~
------- --\ / . f' ~
..--------7 \
~ /
.--/ y/
J II \
NORTH FORK MOOR MANS ~"
Ie RIVER NF DISTRICT
------
"
,;;./
1'/
'/
/
L..-n7
.<
----- ~!j , ---
f
)
['
i--
"
~ -------
~_/ ~--
/
-=----~
/.
~
".
"
"
.... .._ t. 0
---"':":_-'--:--..J
WHITE HALL DISTRICT
SECTION 13~' - ~ '~'--='1~
WHITE HALL DiSTRICT
m rehensive Plan and Re ulations' Designated Rural Area in the
mprehensive Plan and RA, Rural Areas. The nearest Growth Area is
ozet Community, a distance of about 2~ miles south. Preservation of
a ricultural/forestal resources is a major goal of the Plan. The Plan also
lls for the active promotion and support of voluntary techniques such as
ricultural/forestal districts. The Open Space Plan recommends this area for
m untain protection (elevations in the proposed district range from 1,400 to
2,400 feet). All of the proposed addition is within the South Fork Rivanna
Rver Watershed.
II TO SUG
OLLOW DISTRIC :
The proposed addition is located on the west side of Route 810 near
contains 55.79 acres being added to two
in the district. The existing district
The proposed time period is the same as for the original
or ten years from September 6, 1989. The review date is September
ance' Land in the proposed addition is
Si nificant Land Not in A ricultural Fo esta roduction' Both parcels 40-1
are enrolled in the use value assessment program under forestry.
Other Than A
district.
There are no dwellings in the
cal Develo mental Patterns and Needs' This area consists of forested land
Bucks Elbow Mountain. It is well suited for enrollment in a district.
vironmental Benefits' Environmental benefits include protection of ground
surface water, drinking water supplies, wildlife habitat, critical slopes,
open space.
a f Co ent. This addition reflects an exchange of adjacent property which
s recently recorded. All the property now owned by Henley Forest, Inc. is
oposed to be added to the Sugar Hollow District. Property which was
ansferred to the adjacent parcel (now owned by Eugene Hack) is not intended
be in the district. Staff recommends approval of the addition as proposed.
attached) .
Committee Recommendation' The Advisory Committee at its meeting on
recommended approval of the addition as proposed
annin Commission Recommendation' The Albemarle County Planning Commission,
its meeting on November 9, 1993, unanimously recommended approval of the
dition as proposed.
5
. .
10 , .
...-----...-....'....--....".""'......---........-...--...........--....,.".".........".".......--..........-.-...".".-.--............---...........-..........,.-.......... .
....._----.--....... - --.......".... ,.."......... '.."."........,..""......-,..........--.--..-........'..."."........-.............--..........--............................_-----.
.......--............--.............................................""'.....................--.--..-........................--................-.............................."......._-.--.,.
.--.--................................".......-..............__.....................H......._............_................_............................................,........._.._.._....
...-............_._...................H......................__.............................__.............................__............._..._.........................................__....
..--............-.--..............................-..........................................................H................._............._..............__..........................._._..
..........................................<.......................................)IDOttiCiJU....Td...SOGM...mowMlIU;I'lJRM./FORE$tAt..DIS'iiIU.................
TM/PARCEL TOTAL ACREAGE LAND USE ACREAGE OWNER DWELLINGS
AG FOR
Was 40-3 Cpt) Parcel E + 50.75 ------- 53.16 Henley Forest, Inc. 0
Now 40-1 Cpt) Parcel G + 8.n
Parcel F. 6.31
+ 53 16 acs
Was 40-3 Cpt) Parcel B + 4.16 ------- 2.63 Henley Forest, Inc 0
Now 39-4 Cpt) Parcel C - 0.83
Parcel D . 0.70
+ 2 63 acs
TOTAl 55.19 Ka ------- 55 19
',)
.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
Soil
Conservation
Service
401 McIntire Rd
Charlottesville VA
22902-4596
.. __ J) ../')
Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner, Albemarle coun(Y' d~~ .
J. Gordon Yager. Di s tri ct Conserva ti onis t . SCS \ _ n. _.....~
Soils Report on Agricultural/Forestal Districts
Sugar Hollow III Addition
0:
rom:
e:
ate:
August 26, 1993
oils are classified into eight capability classes with Class I
eing the best and Class VIII having the most limitations for
gricultural uses. The following table gives a.breakdown of-
apability Classes for the district.
Capability Class
II
IV
VII
VI
III
ugar Hollow
99%
1%
he following table gives the percentage of the addition that is
uitable for cropland, hayland, pasture and forestry.
Suitable
for
Cropland
Suitable
for
Grassland
& Forestry
Suitable
for
Forestry
ugar Hollow
0%
0%
100%
Q
The Soil Conservation ServIce
is an agency of the
Department of Agriculture
~~;~~~ ~1~~~~'~;t'~~ O~ ~~s
:ORPORATED OR THIS
IV[YOR. .. ,
......." . I /
+......." ."1';"""..,:1
,,~. .
.r '.)~"O:"
'.
jotlll
. (is
811'
i J.
,,~ll ,~e
II.' p.
. eel ,:
oe )9
+::;";.,
I,. _
,
.
~
:l
IS
O{. .
~ ~ ~-~::-t::.o'w
". ~'I ~
;. ~d" .
:\~.
~ . ~
...... '"b a
~~ ~
t~/':'
:> .
'\
:
~ .
. .
,llV,' " 3' If /
~
,t(
;;d rlUI P ~'9.1
J9 -J
..",
,,'(NC(
,. " .. ._, u ._, OJ""
"Il""~~ 'f'I~O."U" " '.. Dl'''.' ., "'.Q'(llC.~ 0.....
au. .,.t,,,,.,. ..,..., ., '1..1""" "VI ..., .....et ,.
t....,.,..._~,..... ..,....,......."....'..I...'UC.
r::':7~"~:':::;" .;::~m ............
~~~ ~w... .......A.
,. ::::~.-....u c.....n Of' ..1.11.........
:~~~~:. ~,.~...:. ~..::.~:~.~..1: ;:: ~:.:C _Ie
:.:ooc,..:l:lJ{:::'';'~~',:~V\.'"U T.C ..... ......
..'..-.-I..I.....'...~:l~
_,." ....".c
L..
f
\
I
I
I
.- _:.0 P"'RCC~ 'F' "
. , -, ,;~~~::;--- ~< 6.3/ Ac. l.t '~~:-::'c
....~~:"..-:."':.-:.~.._--_-:.~... .,o'o'J .. .(Jt"'i';-...":'_.... i
."'..0. " < ~""'.,"t....~lI' ..:....\ '_'.
ff .J~~ ..-':.......:::::...............
'..c I :.,:...:...:..-~7.~;~.-.~~:;:..:~~~.....:.:.~,;~~......--:~0 .. _
-- ~" -.. .....~:::.;::..~"
,;
..' '\
..' I,
..' '\
.::-';;;.~.::;;:::.,--.......":...,L:-~':'~ .it
...-.. ,.. ........---
" "...---..
"
: ~
.)~ .' ,:' t
... . .l.~~:-. I':~;~=:::~;~,::~ ,,~.. ':. .;:~.,:~~~:t
. ., l.." , ..,.,." . , ., "', '~"',.. \!!
.~.. ,~J::~7-:--'; - ,::;:; :.~~.~~ ,.i...~/f.~.;:.'~/~~~~:~
. ..."". .' \. . ' .. ,....... . 'l"j'.t' "J,'~'i:f!i.f:r
. ,",'.",. ! -, t.' l,<....-.;....._:,::....>.:...~.j.!.:....~.
_,' ',0:.,.,'
\..~\
;OV,,~;~cr~:1 ~ ~,,:pun ".. (0""'11[0 TO "[!\Il[Y
rOllllT I..cO_"O."TID IT " DlrO UCOIlDIO IN
;otlO 1001".: '::0 r"GI 113 I.. TM! CLU,""S 0"1((
,.. THI C'Ilt:UIT COUIlT O~ " II"AIlIo.I CClUNTT..
't!IIGIMI....
,....CIL ,
JOullCh THIS ,,,orrllTY \U, (ONVIYIO TO h[N\'[T
.,UII1. I"CDIl"O"ATlD ., A 0(10 IllCOIlDIO I"
lIlIO 'OOK '11 "AG[ ).) IN THI CLfIUt'S 0""[
I), TMt CUCUIT COUIlT 01 A II"A"LI (DUNTT,
lI"~IHIA.
seldOM C ".-
'0 .(...,~ ....Drsr.."""" XEMPT
. I ~.JJ'~O'''' "c.,,'
. , 11"".'10", n...'
II''''''<<JC $0#. .0
. , IU.IT'IO"r ~.,., I
-. S.I"N'IO"r I~.I ,
., ""III'OC I~--'I jREDATE I
~>>'.D~ ,.o.fiO
S"~R'.,', ,....,. .:ItLOTS CREATED
s.,__,-",,", .I.,c'
--
,....CILS ". . " c
10YIlCt.. THIS ~.or(.TT "A CDNV1Y[0 TO JACO"S
10"llIT,,'" '''''CT. I"'COIl,.O". ID IT OtlO 0.110
~:~L. .~:i..l~:: ~~:R~~O~: ~C~. o:I~~I'~~:C~~~"
'DUIl, 0' ALlln"aL.1 COUNTY. Vla'I.I".
ACReS
LANO UIf'VCYINQ. Pl..ANNINQ
04 CLAY STRCCT
LY BUlfa. VA. Z. 'Oof
( 041'U.4H4
LA T SHOWINa
!'AIt CL$ . A-. -11- ~ "c"
'AlfT I' THe 'IfO'ClfTYOF
~*.P..E!::Sjz&..f?.. rtt!;~'.~ T.RACT, INC.'
HENLE
. ~.'"
FOREST, INC.
WHo TENALL O/STRICT
~.~.! _~"-~_f_~l?u~Tr. v~
,....Cll.. I
laUIlc:l1 TM'I .1I0'UTf ",I' (ONYITlO TO N(N\.IT
'AU IT. 'NCOIII"OIlA'IO 'T 'C~louLI . ,. A 01[0
0' IJlC"AIIOI AND "GIIII"'IN, DATID A""\. 1..11.0
....D IIICO.OIO I.. PlIo .ooli 10'7 r.G[ 110 I" To-I
C\'[IIIl" O"ICI 0' T"e CUCUIT COU.T 0' .\.-.I"'"IILI
..COUIotTY. VI.CINIA.
'L!!.eNLE:Y FOREST, tNC.]
D8.6/1 P. 365 ,
"'" .. w".1......... ..c.-tl .'f I-C""'''I ",'.
'..c,1.' ....c;,.'.'.,....... .".. ~u."........ .I~..tl
....... ..... ,... ......,.. ,....c,..
(~" .r: ". IJ'~. J..'
If 0-1
.....a..... ....,
.,......_If
"",,,,1. ....... ..c'"
. '.11 '..l'."'.
. ...-.....,.".....
, '."'..'1".'.
..;:.;:~;.;;;~.::;:..
','.....
. r""bo"r
u.,QII)'
....
140 -!>
"
PARCel; -",-
,TU II'" 11IO. .0 . ), J
, , j
01 IC III1lL ':n.n' 'CUI
.. '.11 hKI\. ...
. . . . ~o... ruen. .c.
. . -:. ..~.I.T'O.rucu. .0.
".:\ '. \.' ,.',..'" 'I.n ,...t('l~ .,.
" .1' '.It ,uc,\.. .,. .'ro..
. .. . '.'1 'IKIL..C" ,.. \ I.'
a. . I.'.T ''''Cl\. .... ,.,.IITII
D.'" hKI~ .C. '.I,.",U
I," \.In. 1111l""0.'
. :,
'. .-'.
n.. ut 10hL I'U
~
.
"
'. ,
1".,
Q ";':a
fat ......
~ .....~-:
~ ',;~ ~ :'--:\I~
&.......~.,
''';:'~ ..:~~
~t?:.t ..'/...
':,l(li\.~.tL ~
.... :or: I 'S' ,
ti2}~~~..:, -
.f'_:j...~:,~::~
1 .___,
:,.~. -L--.__.... "~,i?.:_=:};=;'::-..-~ ..~=
\',:-'.
I.'.IY ~.tl
r:./..
a
~
. WiNSTON r. JONES
DB. 4:]9 P.!S!SO I
." 40-4
.~
J. I
::
"'.J"J~~,,~oo'
~.:~;~,~-
. :.",,....:,,..,. "1000.
JOSEPH T. JR.. a
JOAN H. HENLEY
OB.!596 P.4/5
40-8
NOTtt lIClS 'I.af VAS
UWISU ..,111. ~. 1'1U
10 '00 IIIoru ~ "rUT[lta
NO sunu VAS 'Uo[ "
.C'U THII our.
I
ITT JNTer Z.IZ '0"
.tAIIINGS . D1SrANCC
.crwrell ."..11' "Dova
~,,' .'11'." ""AO.
"'1. lun 'O<."O',U... ,IU.II' .'11'."
"... "'''''104. ''''''''''1'' ,.... " h. '''.111
8i' ... .."..I.... 1I'".I,...I'~n. '"''1''' ~I
....ell, ,..,. ....... ""tU ..", ~".."
.'''.'''''h(l. 100(,..,,,..11. II., ('woIIII"
"'LlI '....'.10<."......... IIC", .. ,..,u.." fin
h"'''' ... ""161' "I"" ...."1.. ,.,,"'. U.. ....."
"'"1.110("...."..." C..'HUII hC....
.o""'Il..un. ,1O("'OIltll.. '11' IIICUnol'
." l'Ulnl ...."000... ,.uu....,." '.u,....
,.. l'hl.'IIUI1I1IO"~... "...".. ,UII
101(...11.11.... ......... 'U.o.l,. .'''1''11
II, "". .. ..."""., ,.. 'OU" '11""11...
"U'UC. II. "'J.
I
i
'8'~
'Iflv.r,
;/1_3 - (ila 1
,J
"l ~I
~.Q!.,
~,:iJ Q
"''Ii'"
Q II; .,
;;! ~ I
.,~.,Q
~ ~ ..,...
!oj '"
>. ili ..
:::~Cl
~l
"t
, ::;~....
~,.::r'c-*t:1
.I'tJto."J...
/
I
A'''''OKO 'Olt IttCOlfOArlOll
T. JONES
WINSTON p.;50
DB.4J5_6'
...........
. a&^I.TIt o~~ .
~ Joo.,-:'
-./. .,d, - _..,..:~
o ~
! u r. T. SWC[HT ;:
.~ No. 6638
~ .,
--.f., Q~
";"0 SURVf,"I
--....
~o
....~ <!J
~")~\.V ,0
.....0 .l~ e~,
70" . ~~...~ ~I
~-(..\ ~o~^o -"_"_0_"_.
..,_.,.........'.,,011''''.
::.':=--:::..~~~:=
~_~ ~.IO.:~ .~--::::f.'.. ~...
.....
. ; .
~=cc==m-I---~ <'~-:=:c;;;,
>-
I-
Z
:>
o
<.)
W
-l .
a::~
<(
~
w
m
j
'.-i
~
~~ \
~~
"'------+
----~
'"
\
.~'
.~~
~ I "x", ......"
5 I ~ '\,
o ~ .v..~ ~_ ~.
<.) "r-. "=- .~~....m.1
~q ,
~ ~. ---~ . \
a:: ~ "" I '\ /'
~ ---~ "'. /: /1
~ / l ////.
~ /--------- / \ //
/ '--", X
/\ ~
" (-
".'"
'" ,----/--..............
\' ---------- .........
\ /'
'--~---",--__x
. p)
'':~.",j
z
o
I-
o
W
(/)
t-
o
0::
~ ~
o
-.. ~
en
It)
z
o
I-
o
W
(/)
t-
o
oc
t-
1Il
is
~ ...J
~ ...J
<(
:I:
w
t:
:I:
~
'fl
I'
I "
.. .
The proposed district is located on the east side of Route 231 near
The proposed addition contains 3.811 acres in one parcel. The
district contains 1,684 acres.
The proposed time period is the same as for the original
8 years from September 3, 1986. The review date is September 3,
ricu1tura1 and Forestal Si nif'cance. Land in the proposed addition is
c rrently open.
nd Not in A cu1tura c on' This parcel is not
c rrently enrolled in the use value assessment program. However, the owner
application for agricultural use.
There are no dwellings on this
cal Develo mental Patterns and Needs' This area consists of large farms and
s attered dwellings. It is well suited for enrollment in a district.
Re ulations' This area is designated Rural Area
the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned RA, Rural Areas. The nearest Growth
ea is Rivanna Village, a distance of about 6 miles south. Preservation of
ricultural/forestal resources is a major goal of the Plan. The Plan also
lIs for the active promotion and support of voluntary techniques such as
ricultural/forestal districts. The Open Space Plan shows the proposed
dition as important farmlands, and it is also located within the Southwest
untain National Register Rural Historic District. Route 231 is a Virginia
ay and a designated County Entrance Corridor.
vironmenta1 Benefits. Environmental benefits include protection of ground
a d surface water, wildlife habitat, the historic landscape, and open space.
aff Comment. The owner of this parcel currently owns other parcels in the
nloch District, and has recently acquired this parcel. Staff recommends
a proval of the addition as proposed.
attached).
Committee Recommendat on' The Advisory Committee at its meeting on
recommended approval of the addition as proposed
anni Commission Recommend tion' The Albemarle County Planning Commission,
its meeting on November 9, 1993, unanimously recommended approval of the
dition as proposed.
6
,. ..
. .
.....'.........".....--.........----......... .......--....-.....--...."....,....".............'"-..............---.-............". ..
.... '.......".. ...........--.--........-....................,..... ........................................."....".......".....'........"......-.........-.....". .
.........................................-....................,..,........,. .........................-...........-....................,..............................-.............. ..
...........................................................................'.........................--.........................-.................,..,........,...........".....,..,.. .
.......,........,................................,..................,."...'...........................,.'................,..,.....,.....,..............,........................'..,..,.
.-...............,........".........."....................,......,....,..,.........................................,..,........,..............,..,......,..,...................'...,...
.""'.........-..........".,............,....................,........,.. ................... '................,..,............................. .....,....... ............ '.......
...................... ...............................................APO.... '1' 'T" ("(IN" ...... '."t' "'T' '0' .....l.. (..... .L..oae..... ....MIt....... 't' 'WL'" .11lW;....... ../.. FCItE........ .$T.... 'N." .....0.. .t' '$1'''' "R' 't' .J;T.... .....;..... .
.................'................................ . ." ,..... , ". .. '.". ......'.......
:::::::::::::::-:.:::-:-:::::-:::::':::::;:::::-::::::::::::::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::::;:;:;:;'.. .,,','.:: .,' <:' :,,:.':::; .',::::.: :,. :','.'. :::-.. ."',, """" ,....:':"" ,:" .,'::::. .','" :,:.": :::::::>..........
TM/PARCEL
TOTAL ACREAGE
65-93A1
3 811
LAND USE ACREAGE
AF FOR
OWNER
S. Barclay Rives or
Agnes B. Rives
DWELL! NGS
o
I . .
. . .
\LBEMARLE CO AD.DITION III TO
KINLOCH
A/F DISTRICT
\
\
.., .
RIVANNA DISTRICT
SECTION.65
, .
.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
Soil
Conservation
Service
401 McIntire Rd
Charlottesville VA
22902-4596
To:
e:
Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner, Albemarle coun1)'
J. Gordon Yager, District Conservationist, s~ ~~~
' ~ /1-v
Soils Report on Agricultural/Forestal Districts *~
Kinloch III Addition
From:
ate:
August 26, 1993
oils are classified into eight capability classes with Class I
eing the best and Class VIII having the most limitations for
gricultural uses. The following table gives a breakdown of
apability Classes for the district.
Capability Class
II
III
IV
VI
VII
inloch
100%
he fOllowing table gives the percentage of the addition that is
uitable for cropland, hayland, pasture and forestry.
Suitable
for
Cropland
Suitable
for
Grassland
& Forestry
Suitable
for
Forestry
inloch
100%
100%
100%
~
The Soil Conservation Service
IS an agency of the
Department of Agriculture.
. d ~
~
Agricultural/Forestal District Advisory Committee Meeting
October 18, 1993
meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. Members present.
e: Stephen Murray, Chairman, Joseph Jones, Vice-Chairman,
ce Woodzell, Bruce Hogue, Dan Maupin and Jacquelyne Huckle.
ff persons were: Gordon Yager, District Conservationist, SCS,
Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner. Applicants present were
rry Joseph and Pete Larson.
ture Fence Mountain District:
ff presented the staff report for Pasture Fence Mountain
Di trict. Staff noted that another adjacent owner, Carroll
Sm'th, said he was going to submit an application. Ms. Huckle
qu stioned who owns the center property not included, and where
Mr. Smith's property is located.
Jones said attempts are being made to get the Fishburne/Sayre
perty included, but several owners were involved. Smith
perty is to the southeast.
ess to the proposed district is a right-of-way along the North
k Moorman's River. Joe Jones explained that the Shifflett
perty was timbered the year before last due to the gypsy moth.
Hunt Club property has had selective cutting done on half of
It is a good hardwood site with poplar.
don Yager noted that it is mountain land well suited for
wing trees, with some of the addition suitable for grassland
agriculture uses.
Maupin moved to accept the staff recommendation for approval.
. Huckle made a second. The motion was unanimously approved.
L. Jose h Plat:
presented the staff report.
Ms Huckle confirmed that no additional houses would be built.
Ms Joseph said the only differences would be on the plat.
Da Maupin asked if there would be any change in use. Ms. Joseph
re lied that both she and Mr. Bowyer like wilderness - he is
do ng this as a favor. This is the only way to resolve her
fi ancial problem.
Jo Jones noted this was a matter of change on paper.
Da Maupin said there was no change in use and it would not
af ect the district.
.. ...
.
Ag icultural/Forestal Advisory Committee Meeting
Pa e 2
Oc ober 18, 1993
Ms. Joseph said the land was steep over a creek, and not much
co ld be done with it.
ce Woodzell confirmed that Ms. Joseph was splitting her
cel, and adding one part to the adjacent property.
Jones made a motion to follow staff recommendation for
roval. Dan Maupin made a second. The motion was unanimously
roved.
Fork Moormans River District:
ff presented the staff report.
don Yager noted that this is also mountain land, slightly
ter than that in the Pasture Fence Mountain District. He also
ed that there is a large wetland area in the proposed
trict.
ce Woodzell made a motion to recommend approval. Ms. Huckle
e a second. The motion was unanimously approved.
ition to Su ar Hollow District:
ff presented the staff report.
re was discussion regarding the survey, that one adjacent
er was listed incorrectly. Staff said the plat was already
orded.
ce Hogue made a motion to recommend approval. Dan Maupin made
econd. The motion was unanimously approved.
ition to Kinloch District:
ff presented the staff report.
ce Woodzell said the owner had applied for land use, he
ends to cut hay.
Maupin noted that this size parcel would not be eligible for
d use. Bruce Woodzell said it was adjacent to other land
ed by the same owner.
Jones asked if the applicant is Sandy Rives. It was
ermined the applicant is his brother.
.- ~
.. "
icultural/Forestal Advisory Committee Meeting
e 3
ober 18, 1993
Maupin made a motion to recommend approval. Ms. Huckle made
econd. The motion was unanimously approved.
tham District - U ate on review and new addition:
ff explained that several applications were received for
itions to the Eastham District following the Advisory
ittee's last meeting on September 13, 1993. Staff explained
t the Board of Supervisors voted to continue the Eastham
trict for ten years on October 13, 1993, but did not review
Bigelow's parcel because there was a zoning violation
ding. Staff discussed each parcel individually for which an
lication had been received.
ce Woodzell said some of the parcels had no development rights
aining, and now wanted cheaper taxes.
Maupin said if the property is kept out of the district, the
er may let it grow up and become an eyesore to the community.
Jones said that the districts were created as a boon to the
nty. Others have used districts for protection, why shouldn't
se properties?
Huckle said also that current regulations are not cast in
crete. A different Board of Supervisors might change the
prehensive Plan and development rights would be changed. If
property is put in a district for ten years, it couldn't be
eloped during that time.
ve Murray said (Panorama Farms) did a similar thing. All the
elopment rights were used to develop Graymont, then the farm
put in the district.
Br ce Woodzell said his only question is whether the County is
be ng penalized.
Br ce Hogue said if the property meets the (State) criteria, it
sh uld be accepted.
Da Maupin said the discussion amounted to splitting hairs.
Go don Yager said if a property is eligible for land use tax then
it should be accepted in a district. If the district is a means
to get land use tax then more will join.
. .. 41
~ .. ..
Ag~icultural/Forestal Advisory Committee Meeting
Pa~e 4
OCr--ober 18, 1993
St~ff noted that the County had considered doing away with land
us~ tax except for the open space category. Then, property
ow~ers would have to make a commitment and join a district in
or~er to receive land use tax.
Jo~ Jones said the districts save open space, that is the
in~ended purpose.
Br~ce Woodzell said (without development rights) they can't do
mo e anyway.
Jo~ Jones said this addition would give the core more protection.
Da~ Maupin said he sees Bruce's point but doesn't think we can
le~ally deny approval on that basis.
St~ve Murray said there is not criteria to prevent this from
go ng through.
Br~ce Woodzell said if they can't deny the parcels, he was sorry
he talked about it so much. Staff said it was important to
di~cuss it.
St~ve Murray said we talked about it long and hard.
Jo~ Jones asked if one of the parcels was close enough to core.
St~ff said it was closer than the one mile requirement.
Br~ce Woodzell made a motion to recommend approval of the
ad~itional parcels to Eastham District. Dan Maupin made a
se(~ond. The motion was unanimously approved.
Di cussion of Rental Units:
Sti ff said the Planning Commission requested on October 5, 1993,
the t the Advisory Committee address the question of the number of
re tal units permitted on a parcel which is being requested for
en ollment in a district.
JOE Jones said you could leave out the acreage which is used for
in ensive purposes.
Ms Huckle said there are persons who are violently opposed to
lard use tax and agricultural/forestal districts. We should not
pr<vide them with additional reasons to oppose districts.
Pr<perty owners who violate the ordinance are hurting those who
arE doing it right.
...
" .....
. ... .
,
Agricultural/Forestal Advisory Committee Meeting
palJe 5
Oc~ober 18, 1993
Dap Maupin said the whole idea is to restrict development for
8-~0 years. If a property owner has 5-6 housing units and
silJnificant farmland, we should not keep him out of the district.
Jo~ Jones said we could exclude the rental units if they are not
fa~m employees or family. They might be rented to University of
Vi~ginia students, for example, for non-farm-income.
St~ve Murray said, but that income could be keeping the farm in
fa~ming. We have allowed rental units to go through in the past.
Da~ Maupin said they are taxed as rental units. Whether they are
in a district or not is of little consequence. Steve Murray said
prpbably the Eastham (Bigelow) case was an extraordinary
si uation.
Ms Huckle asked if it is the sense of the committee that people
whp violate standards should answer to someone.
Da~ Maupin made a motion that the policy regarding rental units
shpuld be kept the way it is now, with zoning violations taken
ca e of properly. Ms. Huckle made a second. The motion was
un~nimously approved.
Discussion - New Members:
Ms Scala Said she would like to recommend that some new members
be added to Advisory Committee, including at least one member
frcpm the Agricultural/Forestal Industries Support Committee which
is being disbanded because it has completed its work. She said
thct perhaps the members who rarely attend meetings would not
mild being replaced. She suggested that Rob Bloch be added, and
as ed for other suggestions. The Committee members agreed and
su(gested a member also be added from the Scottsville District,
Po! sibly Paul Coleman, James Powell, Ben Thomas or Ed Shearer.
ThEre are already enough representatives from the north and west.
ThE meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
. 't
Edward H Bin. Jr
Samuel Mil er
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scotlsvil!e
David P. Bo erman
Charlotlesv lie
Charles 5 Martin
RIV('Innd
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
Ella W. Carey, Clerk ,I
November 29, 1993
Board Actions of November 17, 1993
At its meeting on November 17, 1993, the Board of Supervisors approved a
equest from the Children and Youth Commission to fund a Teen Center site on
estfield Road. Attached is the signed appropriation form.
ttachment
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Pat Mullaney
*
Printed on recycled paper
,
FISC L YEAR
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
93/94
NUMBER
930041
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
GEN~L/J'EEN CTR.
APPROPRIATION:
FUND FOR TEEN CENTER OPERATION FOR FY 93/94.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
71017130000
71017210000
71017231000
71017232000
71017241000
71017270000
71017390002
71017510100
71017520300
71017520405
71017540200
71017600500
71017800100
71017800200
71017800660
71017700009
SALARIES-PARTTIME
FICA
HEALTH INSURANCE
DENTAL INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
WORKER'S COMPo
REFUSE
ELECTIRCAL SERVICE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CABLE TV
LEASE/RENT-BUILDING
LAUNDRY & JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
MACHINERY/EQUIP-NEW
FURNITURE & FIXTURES-NEW
ALTERATIONS TO BUILDINGS
$6,237.00
477.00
800.00
30.00
55.00
137.00
710.00
2,880.00
715.00
211.00
16,000.00
667.00
2,150.00
2000
7,000.00
PARKS & REC.-TEEN CENTER
TOTAL
17,974.00
$58,043.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
16000160502
16000160503
51000510100
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
$20,034.50
20,034.50
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
17,974.00
TOTAL
$~i8, 043.00
**** *******************************************************************
REQU STING COST CENTER:
DIRE
OF FINANCE
OF SUPERVISORS
PARKS & RECREATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
~~~L#~~
'/~ / 'i .: / _
r-,>fJ {( ! (/ . !?/u-(/)
/.. il
/./-,;Z.2 -7~
/1- . ;{1 73
// - /.;;: - 9 3-
.1.... .J'D..~..r~ @ if II W R @~. ."..
' -_ l5~g
. n j
J, : ! ~
.~ . !I '~ Wm ] I.
d, t.,~",
I L __I
IfOARD OF SUP
,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Appropriation Request
AGENDA DATE:
November 17, 1993
ACTION:
x
ITEM NUMBER:
9;1,// / 7. ~cS-.~
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT
Request
funding
Road.
to approve
on Westfield
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes (6)
STAFF CO
Messrs.
& Mullaney
REVIEWED BY:
/{crl
BACKGRO
On Dece er 11, 1992, the CACY Commission presented a formal proposal to the Board and
Council concerning the establishment of a Teen Center. At that time several potential sites
were be ng investigated but none were recommended. It was requested that each locality
appropr'ate funding to hire a Teen Center Director to continue the site search and to begin
working with local teens to develop a Teen Council and teen activities. The Board and
Council appropriated in equal shares a total of $11,860 to fund this request for the
remaind r of FY 92-93.
The sel ction of a Teen Center Director took longer than anticipated as the first round of
intervi ws did not produce any acceptable candidates. The job was readvertised and as a
result y Smith was hired as Teen Center Director and began work on September 7, 1993. The
delay i hiring resulted in an end of year balance of $11,608 in the Teen Center budget for
FY 92-93. The CACY Commission requested this amount to be reappropriated in FY 93-94, to be
used to defray additional costs in the event a Teen Center site was found.
The 93-94 operating budget for the Teen Center is $34,535 funded equally by the City and the
County. The operating budget request included an additional $73,190 to be placed in a
conting ncy to be appropriated if a site was found. The contingency request was not funded.
DISCUSS ON:
The Teen Center Steering Committee has now located a site and a representative from the CACY
Commiss'on will be making a recommendation for funding to the Board on November 17 and City
Council on November 15. The site is located on Westfield Road in the County and is on the
City bus line. The estimated renovation costs of $7000 are minimal compared to other sites
cons ide ed. The rental fee for the 2700 sq. ft. space will not exceed $24,000/year which is
$8.88/s . ft. Final negotiations on rent will begin if Board and Council approve funding for
the sit. One half of the funds necessary to purchase initial capital items such as a TV,
stereo, CR, and furniture will be sought through donations.
Y is the fiscal agent for the Teen Center and as such must appropriate the entire
amount n eded and then are reimbursed by the City for their share. The total additional (new)
appropriation necessary from the City and the County to fund this Teen Center site for the
rest of Y 93-94 is $40,069 above and beyond the current budgeted amount. This consists of
$20,035 from the City and a like amount from the County. Of this $20,035 needed from each
jurisdic ion, there is a carryover balance of unspent funds from last year of $5,804.50 from
each loc lity( $11,608 total). If the carryover balance is used toward the request to open
the new site, then each jurisdiction would be approving $14,231 each in addition to the
carryove money for the balance of 1993-94, making the new appropriation $20,035 in County
funds an $20,035 in City funds for a total appropriation of $40,069.
RECOMME
It is s aff' s recommendation that if the Board and Council still support a central Teen
Center s'te, as recommended by the CACY Commission, funding for this site should be approved.
,
Albemarl~ County Board of Supervisors
RE: Tee~ Center Site Appropriation Request
November 17, 1993
Page 2 of 2
The Coun~y share of this funding for the remainder of FY 93-94 is $20,035 including the
carryover funds. City Council is scheduled to hear the same request on November 15, 1993.
Recommen~ed sources of funding, should the Board choose to approve this request is an
appropri~tion from the General Fund Balance. Total appropriation amount is $40,069.
Enclosur~s: Current 93-94 Teen Center Budget
Teen Center Building - Additional Budget Request 93-94
Summary of Teen Center Director's Activities
Teen Center Site Search Summary
Teen Center Location Map
Teen Center Floor Plan
TEENSIGHIr
93.185
. ,
SUMMARY OF TEEN CENTER DIRECTOR'S ACTIVITIES
~een Center Director position filled September 7, 1993.
(OMPLETED TASKS
- Established contacts within each public high school.
(Albemarle, Charlottesville, Murray, and Western
Albemarle)
- Established contacts within each private high school.
(Northside Christian, St. Anne's Belfield, and Tandem)
- Selected two teens from each public high school and one
teen from each private high school to serve on the Teen
Council.
- First Teen Council meeting to be held Thursday, October
21, 1993.
- Visited three existing teen centers (Warrenton Where
House, Fairfax Old Firehouse, and Fredericksburg The
Morgue) .
- Held four Steering Committee Meetings since Director began
work on September 7, 1993.
- Director and members of the Steering Committee met with
the Junior League to develop volunteer support.
- Director visited all County and City parks and community
centers.
- Obtained donations of two large desks, two computer
tables, and one piano for Teen Center.
- Visited possible sites for Teen Center with negotiations
underway.
- Distributed first press release during the week of
September 27th.
- Joint City/County teen dance on Saturday, October 23,
1993.
- Met with the CACY Commission on October 5, 1993.
. .
TEEN CENTER SITE SEARCH SUMMARY
Over the past year, the Teen Center Steering Committee has
ooked at several sites for a Teen Center. For various reasons
,11 of the sites, with the exception of the Westfield Road site,
~ere not feasible. The following are the sites that were
considered and not selected:
Old YMCA location on Park Street - High renovation costs,
reighborhood concerns, dangerous access, restrictions placed on
cperating hours by MACCA.
~. Carver Rec Center - No place to transfer existing programs.
~ot a neutral location in terms of County participants and some
City participants.
~. Rio Road location (beside putt-putt) - Owner not interested
end wanted a longer lease than Committee was willing to consider.
4. Old Sound Machine Building on Barracks Road - Owner not
interested and would not allow any necessary building
renovations.
5. Ovenaire - Building is currently for sale and present owner
isn't interested in any lease agreement.
The Steering Committee has concluded its search with the
unanimous recommendation for funding for the Westfield Road site.
listed below are the pro's and con's of the Westfield Road site.
1: ro ' s
1. The facility has enough space to provide everything that has
teen suggested by the teens for a drop in site. (Lounge, game
room, meeting/study areas, and small concession.)
2. Adequate office and storage space.
3. Adequate parking and located on bus route.
4. Building meets ADA requirements for accessibility and floor
plan already suits activity area needs, so only minor renovations
alre necessary.
5. Facility location is neutral and not in residential area.
CDn's
1. Transportation problems possible for City teens.
2. No outdoor activity can be scheduled at the site.
.. ,I-( ~ b. est{';'e\c.l I~,.. I'V~
T e...en en-reV" Slfe
N
"
:;? So
A
'"
"
I.q
.('
~~
s
. ";
.I
i 4 x 2'2
OFF'\ CE / 'STORAGE
TV LOUNG- E
"
14 x l8
" /
It..{ x 13'
,
'S'Tv~y /ME'tI\NG
Roo All
270 59, 'r't.
Fire GX\t
C ANTSr:JJ
REST r~ocMS
I .I
II-I "2 x q
fY\C\I' (\ f 1'\ t r'\/\c.e
30
J
.I
)( 50
.A C T I V \T Y ) So C \ A L
A~ E'A
'IN I ,Vj:\cw
Pc... \<I'~ Lo",
- 3l-f S ~c..;.es -
Edward H
Jack Jouet
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
SCOllsville
Charles 5 Martin
Rlvi'lnna
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
MEMORANDUM
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
Ella W. Carey, Clerk ~~~/
November 18, 1993
JECT:
Board Actions of November 17, 1993
At its meeting on November 17, 1993, the Board of Supervisors took the
llowing actions:
Agenda Item No. 10. Request from the Children and Youth Commission for
nding of a Teen Center site on Westfield Road. Appropriated $40,069 from
e General Fund Balance to fund a Teen Center site on Westfield Road. Please
ovide the necessary appropriation form. Attached is the paperwork on this
em.
Agenda Item No. 11a. Appropriation: Teen Center, $34,535 - (Form
30036). Approved the transfer of $34,535 from the General Fund to the Teen
nter Fund. Attached is the signed appropriation form.
Agenda Item No. 11b. Appropriation: Haffner Equipment Co., $1,125 _
#930039). Approved an appropriation request for $1,125 to complete soil
plan at Haffner Equipment site. Attached is the signed appropriation
tachments (3)
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Jo Higgins
Pat Mullaney
(1)
Printed on recycled paper
,
'"
~ ',;1/
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- /d..-~3
;iO OJ: 31 :~
..~.,,=.,_..,.,.~----_._--,..
AGENDA T
Appropri
AGENDA DATE:
November 17, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
ct3./J,'?- {.S-_'5
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT
Teen Cen
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
BACKGRO
The FY
Teen Ce
REVIEWED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CO
Messrs.
Huff & Breeden
budgets for the City and County allocated funds to establish and operate the
DISCUSS ON:
In orde to properly account for the Teen Center operations, a separate fund is being
establi hed similar to other joint City/County operations. This action will authorize the
County 0 expend City and County funds allocated and the transfer of the County's allocation
to the een Center Fund. This action is necessary regardless of the decision made for
additio al funding also presented as an agenda item on November 17, 1993.
approval of the appropriation as detailed on attached form #930036.
93.177
-
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
93/94
NUMBER
930036
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
TEEN CENTER
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
LISMENT OF TEEN CENTER FUND BUDGET FOR FY 93/94.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
71017110000 SALARIES $21,400.00
71017160900 SALARY RESERVE 490.00
71017210000 FICA 1,675.00
71017221000 VRS 1,895.00
71017231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 1,585.00
71017232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 60.00
71017241000 VRS GROUP LIFE INS 190.00
71017270000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 290.00
71017310000 PROF. SERVICES 2,700.00
71017360000 ADVERTISING 750
71017520100 POSTAL SERVICES 400
71017520300 TELEPHONE 150
71017580505 SECURITY SERVICES 400
71017600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 400
71017600200 FOOD SERVICE SUPPLIES 750
71017601300 EDUC. & REC. SUPPLIES 400
71017601700 COPY SUPPLIES 1,000.00
TOTAL
$34,535.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2421 16000160503
2421 16000160503
COUNTY-TRANSFER FROM GEN'L FUND
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
$17,267.50
17,267.50
TOTAL
$34,535.00
**** *******************************************************************
STING COST CENTER:
PARKS & RECREATION
VALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
TOR OF FINANCE
~~~#~
~
,/" -.:z..5 - .7..3'
OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
/ / - /,,,,2 -- 7:$
AGENDA T TLE: Haffner Equipment Co.
EC Plan 1866
AGENDA DATE:
November 17, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
9;]. JJ / ? ,.5:,'/
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT
Haffner
ACTION: ~
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CO
Messrs.
Ms. Higgins
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGRO
Haffner Equipment was issued an Erosion Control Permit based upon an approved Erclsion Control
Plan (I 66). Subsequently, the work was not completed and the bond was called. The surety,
USF&G, ubmitted a check to the County in the amount of $1,125.00.
This in ludes $750 for the work remaining, $225 for outstanding County fees, and $150 for
adminis ration.
DISCUSS ON:
In orde to expend funds to finish the work, the funds must be appropriated into an
expendi ure cost center.
the Board approve Appropriation #930039 in the amount of $1,125.00.
RECOMME
This is
HAFFNER.EXE
93.182
~~: ~ ~\
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
L YEAR
93/94
NUMBER
930039
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GENERAL
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
NG TO COMPLETE SOIL EROSION PLAN AT HAFFNER EQUIPMENT SITE.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
41000312371
HAFFNER EQUIP. SOIL EROSION
$1,125.00
TOTAL
$1,125.00
2100 19000199900
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
OTHER RECOVERED COST
$1,125.00
TOTAL
~;1,125.00
**** *******************************************************************
REQU STING COST CENTER:
ENGINEERING
APPR
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRE
OF FINANCE
.~~~~~
./ CJ .- ;;::. :T - '9....3
BOAR OF SUPERVISORS
ATE
GENnA ITEM NO.
GENnA ITEM NAME
EFERRED UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86
..
..
J\ \ U\/~ Il \ (e', ~~
, -
[,' ~ \ \ \ \-l ~ ~ \
C VV v~ lli r~t ~.. (V\ S
'I) ? C. \
, .(. '\
f .
r
I
~/
,
// - /,;( -7':3
'13. // /?, ~5Z,
ALBEMARLE COUN'IY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
..
j '~Ol ~ [[5 f?: q \\17 i i'
1 ~ ,-:;.;,-,~;:'. ~~,
L~l
October 22, 1993
j !
BOARD OF SUPERVISORSj
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County School Board
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
Robert W. Paskel R4J?
Division Superintendent
Interim Report from High School
Feasibility Study Committee
The High School Feasibility Study Committee composed of Mr. Bain and
rs. Humphris and Mr. Landrith and Mrs. Moore have met and considered various
ptions to providing additional capacity for high school age students in Albemarle
ounty. Among the options explored have been: Construction of a new high
chool; the potential of expanding CATEC; lease purchase arrangements with the
rivate sector; joint agreement with the City for utilization of vacant seats at
harlottesville High School; the recently completed feasibility study of Western
lbemarle High School; and joint construction project with Piedmont Virginia
ommunity College. These options were considered in light of the School Board
stablished capacity standards for elementary, middle and high schools (adopted
y School Board on October 26,1992).
The committee has pursued these options to the extent it feels necessary.
efore making a final report, we would like to receive direction concerning
dditional options identified in Dr. McGeehan's memorandum (copy attached)
hich exceed the charge for this committee. The committee requests that the
chool Board and the Board of Supervisors consider the additional topics
i entified in Dr. McGeehan's memorandum at their November 8th and November
Oth meetings respectfully and provide direction to their committee
epresentatives concerning these issues. Following those actions, the committee
"11 be prepared to submit its final report for consideration by the two Boards.
...' Dr. J(l~eph R. \It:t;\:ch..n
Su('er/flI,,:dt.:lIl ,d' Scir", -1.\
'---.. .--I
FROM:
All Members, High School Feasibility Study Committee
for Albemarle County Public SCh03 ~
Joseph R. IlcCeehan. superintendeni of ~\~ J ~
October 14, 1993
TO:
DATE:
Members of the Albemarle County High Sch~ol Feasibility Study Com-
mittee (County Executive, County Superintendent, County Supervisor) met
with two City Councilors, two City School Board members, the City Manager,
and the City Superintendent of Schools on October 8, 1993. The purpose of
the meeting was to discuss:
1. Would the Charlottesville City School Board be inter-
ested in discussing the possibilities of a joint
agreement for the utilization of vacant seats at Char-
lottesville High School?
2. What is the approximate number of seats which might be
available if such an agreement could be reached?
The Superintendent of the City Schools informed those persons
present that 1) 200 seats were available for 1994-95, and, subject to
continued discussion and appropriate study, 2) 1,000 seats might be made
available over a period of several years. An architect and building engi-
neer would need to evaluate the floor plans for Charlottesville High School
to determine the feasibility and cost of alterations to the school. In
1975, the core high school facility was designed to hold up to 3,000 stu-
dents. The plans included space for another wing of classrooms.
The County Supervisor, members of the City Council and the School
Board expressed interest in future meetings to discuss: 1) establishing.
seats for city high school students at Murray; 2) expanding CATEC facili-
ties to offer additional classes for city and county students; 3) estab-
lishing a jointly-attended alternative school for students who may be a
threat to the safety and welfare of themselves and their peers; and
4) creating a cluster of high schools (Albemarle, Charlottesville,
Murray, CATEC, and Western) with specific curricular emphases (e.g., Fine
Arts - Performing Arts, Science and Technology). According to approved
guidelines, parents and students could select the high school for their
studies. Thus, educational issues other than housing students can be
explored.
Charlottesville Public Schools
15b: Dalr~ r.;.\ 'au
Ch~rlon~~\1I1c. Vir~:!1!a :~''''.-::
I ~'O.1) t)iq_l~:::n
F.\.'\ I;';{~\ 2.J.L'I7~-
-2-
All present agreed that the Superintendent of the City Schools would
prepare a memorandum concerning this discussion and forward it to the County
Superintendent for distribution and discussion by the Albemarle County High
School Feasibility Study Committee. The Superintendent of the City Schools
would be available to answer committee members' questions.
JRM/bp
...
"
'~ 1CA.J II \ ") ">'"
GENnA ITEM NO. Cl2j , \ \ G 7) \ to c; )
r)
GENnA ITEM NAME ({ \ ,-
'} ..
EFEllRIlD lINTIL l h \ Ii (I \ )S c \ S
Form. 3
7/25/86
//-/,:<-f3
'/3, JI I? ~s?J
Edward H. B in, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvi Ie
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
0:
Board of Supervisors
ROM:
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~~
ATE: November 12, 1993
UBJECT: Reading List for November 17, 1993
-l..6-..(.A) , 1 qq? _ Mr. Bowerman
May l3(A), 1992 - Mr. Bain
1992 - pages 1 - 20 (#12) - Mr. Perkins
vember 4, 1992 - Mr. Martin
pages 1 - 13
pageD 13 (#8)
(#8) - Mr. Martin
end My;:;. Humphri::>
.-"pages 1- 8 UtJ:.G+
. pageD 33 (#11)
H:r.
end
Bci.LIl
Mrs
r~,,--~~
HJ1mphris
ust 18
93 - Mr. Marshall
E C:mms
Mr. Bain read his portion of July 14 but no motion was for
their approval.
(1)
Printed on recycled paper
rko-Z3 - 52 -Yo - 'f3 - ,..