HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-10-10 ACTIONS
Board of Supervisors Meeting of October 10, 2001
.October 11, 2001
AGENDA.ITEI~.ACTION
1. Call to order.
4. From the Public: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
· There were none.
5.1 ZMA-1999-11. Clover Lawn Village (Preston Stallings) (Sign
· DEFERRED until December 12, 2.001.
5.2 SP-2001-06. Clover Lawn Village (Preston Stallings) (Sign
· DEFERRED until December 12, 2001.
5.3 ZTA-01-O07. Alleys & Shared Driveways.
· REMOVED from the agenda,
5.4 STA-01-01. Alleys & Shared Driveways.
· REMOVED from the agenda.
5.5 Resolution designating October 13, 2001 as Lewis and Clark
Festival Day.
- ADOPTED
6, Public hearing on proposed FY 2001 budget amendments.
· APPROVED FY 2001 budget amendments in the amount of
. . $935,38.7..60 and appmp 'nations as requested.
7. Public hearing on proposed FY 2002 budget amendments/
reappropfiations.
· APPROVED FY 2002 budget amendments in the amount of
$12,536,616.89 and appropriations as requested.
o Mr. Dorrier asked that staff present a report to the Beard on the
County's Gr~.~y/Biueway Plan...
8. SP-2061.'17. Metric Meadows
· REFERRED back to the Planning Commission.
9. $P-21~1.023 Crozet Laundromat (Sign #40).
· APPROVED subject to the three conditions recommended by
Planning Commission, with change in condition #'! referencing
~ date of theplan.
10. CPA-98-03. Post Office Land Trust.
- Approved CPA-98-03 to amend the Hollymead Community
Profile Recommendations of the Land Use Plan subject to the
text and map amendments recommended by staff.
12. From the Board: Matters not Listed on the Agenda.
Mr. Bowerman commented that safety (in terms of sidewalks) is
a sign'rlicant issue in the area of the Senior Center, and will
need to be looked at.
· Mr. Dorrier asked the status of the drtizen review panel for the
police department. Mr. Tucker responded that Chief Miller will
not make a recommendation until the end of the year or next
year sometime.
· Mr. Perkins asked. Engineering staff to look into the cost of
!
ASSIGNMENT
Meeting was called to Order at 7:00 p.m., by the
Chairman. All BOS members present. Staff
present were Bob Tucker, Larry Davis, Ella Carey
and Wayne Cilimberg.
.Clerk.: Forward signed appropriation forms to
Melvin Breeden and copy appropriate persons.
.Acknowledge donations.
Clerk; Forward signed appropriation forms to
Melvin Breeden and copy appropriate persons.
Acknowledge donations.
Cgerk: Set out conditions in Attachment 1.
Clerk: Set out text amendments in Attachment 2.
parking lots with pervious surfaces. Mr. Tucker responded that
Engineering has already looked into this; a small area in the
lower employee parking tot was done as a test.
· Ms. Thomas commented that Jackson County, North Carolina,
is adopting our wireless service facility ordinance.
· Ms. Thomas commented that the High Growth Coalition is
looking at cluster p[.ovisi, ons.
13. Adjourn to October 17, 2001, 5:00 p,m., Room 235, for Joint
Meeting with Planning Commission.
· At 9:15 p.m,, the meting was adjourned to October 17, 2001,
· 5:00 p.m.
Attachment I - SP-2001-O23. Crozet Laundromat
Attachment 2 - CPA-98-03. Post Office Land Trust
Attachment I
Agenda It~n No. 9. SP:20014)23 Crozet Laundromat (Si;In#40), Public hearing on a request
to a#ow for a coin operated laundromat in accord w/Sec 27.2.2.14 of the Zoning Ord. TM 56A3, P 9B,
contains .7 acs. Located on Three Notch'd Rd (Rt 240) across from the old Con Agra facility. Znd LI.
White Hail Dist.
(Conditions of approval:)
The owner shall provide for the parking and directional signage in general accord with the
improvements shown on the sketch plan, prepared by Raymond E. Gaines, Architect, titled
"Crozet Laundromat" and dated 10/04/01 prior to opening the laundromat use granted under this
special use permif. The individual parking spaces shall be permanently delineated on the site;
The owner shall close the eastern most access point on Tax Map 56A3, Parcel gA, in a manner
that meets with the approval of the Albemarle County Department of Engineering and Public
Works. The requirements of this condition shall be performed prior to opening the laundromat
use granted under this special use permit; and
The applicant shall provide a traffic island or bollards to protect the parking space designated
number "1" on the sketch plan.
Attachment 2
Amendment to Hollymead Community Profile Recommendations
Adopted 10/1012001, (CPA 19984)3, Post Office Land Trust)
(Albemarle County Land Use Plan, page 78)
The area designated as Town Center west of Route 29 and south Airport Road is intended as a
generally more compact, higher density area containing a mixture of businesses, services, public
faclrrltes, residential areas and public spaces, attracting activitieS of all kind. Nearby residential
development will be of high enough densities to support many of these uses,
This designation replaces the previous patchwork of regional service, office service and industrial
service areas in an effort to establish a more unified planning and developme~ process.
The Town Center should adhere to the following twelve design principles as further defined in the
General Development/Design Guidelines: 1) pedestrian orientation, 2) neighborhood friendly streets
and paths, 3) interconnected streets and transportation networks, 4) parks and open spaces, 5)
neighborhood centers, 6) buildings and spaces of human scale, 7) relegated parking, 8) mixture of
uses, 9) mixture of housing types, 10) redevelopment rather than abandonment, 11) site planning
that respects terrain, and 12) clear edges.
The Town C~"qter is intended to inco~ features that conserve land, provide a "critical mass" of
uses and achieve a high level of interaction of activities. Ultimately, it is intended tha portions of the
Town Center include such features as wide sidewalks, on-street parking and parking integrated with
uses, multi-story structures and residential uses above commercial and retail uses. Stand-alone
residential is also appropriate in an urban form.
in addition to oth~ applicable reconmendations of the Comprehensive Plan, ~ Town Center shall
be developed in general accord with the Conceptual Master Plan & Design Guidelines for the
Hollymead Town Center, dated July 20, 2001, by Daggett & Gdgg (the ~Master Plan").
General ,DevelopmenlJDesi~in Guidelines
The following are general guidelines for the entire area designated as a Town Center in the Hollymead
Community.
LAND USE and DENSITY
A mix of residential and non-residential land uses shall be provided within the Town Center,
including Urban Density Residential (0 to 34 du/ac.), Office Service Community Service,
Public/institutional uses including parks and greenways, and Regional Sewice and compatible
Industrial Service.
Uses not considered desirable for this area include heavy industrial and manufacturing uses, and
other large land consuming uses, such as warehousing (including self storage facilities), and auto
dealerships.
Commer~al and residential development should strive to u~ achieve higher densiC~s than
those achieved historically. Development in some areas of the Town Center, particta~y in the Mixed
Use/Regional Service Area, likely will not provide as high a density initially or in the foreseeable future
4
as densities achievable in ~ areas of the Town Center, but development in all areas should be
designed so as no{ to preclude higher densities, through subsequent redevelopment and/or infill,
when the market demographics are such as will justify and support denser development features,
including structured parking and multi-story retail. The desired overall density for the'ultimate build-
out of the Town Center is a FAR of .50. The desired .50 FAR overall density contemplates a net of all
open space, road, street and travel ways, as well as public amenities. Nothing herein shall be
interpreted as limiting the FAR for the Town Center.
While it is desirable for single story buildings to not exceed 65,000 square feet, it is recognized that
large stores, some much larger than 65,000 square feet on one level, such as department stores,
home improvement stores and supermarkets, are appropriate in the Mixed Use/Regional' Service
Area (see Master Plan, Figure 14A). Issues of bulk, massing and pedestrian accessibility for all
buildings, but particularly for single story stores over 65,000 square feet, may be addressed through
various design concepts, such as building facade/roof-line treatments, building orientation and/or
other measures, so as to dilute their appearance as large, monolithic bc~xes and to facilitate
subdividing these stores in the event of the need for re-tenanting with smaller stores.
A significant residential component should be located wffhin the designated Town Center area, both
mixed ~ other commercial/office uses and within walking distance (approx. % n-~le from core
commercial center.
Development of this area pursuant to approval of an overall development plan for the Town Ca~er is
desired. Approval of Development Plans for portions of the Town Center may be necessary and
appropriate in certain situations, but should be in general accord with the Master Plan.
SITE DESIGN
To achieve the intent of the Master Plan:
All building facades visible from a public road should continue design elements present on the front of
the building.
Buildings should be oriented to streets and parking relegated as addressed in the Master Plan.
· Site development should respect the terrain and use appropriate design techniques to minimize
clearing and grading activities.
Roof design should mitigate the visual impact of larger scale structures and associated buildings,
especially considering the ~ location of this area along a ridgeline.
· Loading docks, trash collection facile, outdoor storage and related facilities should be incorporated
into building design so they are not visible.
· Metal buildings should not be permiffed.
· A system of walkways and bikeways should be included in site design.
Parking:
5
-Parking in excess of that necessary to support individual uses in the Town Center is discouraged.
-Parking should be centralized where appropriate. Cooperative parking arrangements
encouraged where feasible.
are
-On-street parking should be incorporated into road design for categories of streets where on-street
parking is contemPlated in the Master Plan.
-Large parking areas should be divided into smaller components using travel ways and median
breaks with trees and other landscaping matedal used to minimize visual impacts and heat generated
by large areas of pavement.
-Minimize parking areas between streets and buildings, as addressed in the Master Plan.
Establish a landscape edge on the east side of the Town Center along Route 29 consistent with the
ultimate design of Route 29 (urban or rural cross-section design) generally contemplated in the
Master Plan.
TRANSPORTATION, TOWN CENTER AREA (See also the TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
section for specific recommendations for improvements along the Route 29 Corridor)
Transit service should be provided as soon as operation is feasible and site design should
accommodate future transit service.
All roads should be designed with the intent of providing pedestrian fdendly neighborhood oriented
streets. All roads in this area should be constructed as an urban cross-section, with sidewalks, and
street landscaping. Lower design speeds and minimizing road width (number of through lanes)
should be encouraged. However, on-street parking should be encouraged where appropriate. A
system of bike lanes should be accommodated as generally depicted in the Master Plan, including all
roads, which connect to lands: adjacent to the Town Center.
The road network for the Town Center should consist of a system of interconnected streets forming a
network of blocks. The network should consist of a minimum of two (2) north-south roads with
crossing streets creating a block pattern. Shorter block lengths consistent with the intent of creating a
walkable community should be provided. The desirable block lengths would be between 200 and 300
feet, although longer block lengths may be permissible based on traffic, topographic, and/or other site
conditions.
The Town Center road network should include connections to Route 29 at Timberwood Boulevard
and Hollymead Ddve, and provide for access to Airport Road at two (2) locations: 1) the future North
Fork Research Park access on Airport Road; and, 2) a future crossover located just west of the U. S.
Post Office Building.
One mid-point access between Hollymead Odve and TimbenNood Drive may utilize a new crossover
on Route 29, if warranted by traffic studies and conditions. Given the current road infrastructure in the
vicinity of the Town Center, such a crossover is an important element of the Town Center and is a
critical ingredient for a Boulevard/Main Street entrance into the development from Route 29. Once the
ultimate transportation network for the Town Center and surrounding environs is in place the
continuing need for such a crossover may be reconsidered,
The north/south parallel road should be designed as a "Boulevard"or "Main Street"(as depicted in
Figures 4 and 5 of the Master Plan), recognizing that while carrying a higher volume of traffic, it also
serves as an important Neighborhood Street within the Town Center concept. As such, the road
needs to ~te pedestrians, cyclists, transit service and contribute positively to the character
of the area. Other streets in the Town Ca~er may be designed as a "Main Street,' 'Avenue,"
"Neigh~ Street,' or"Way" depending on the character and intensity of development in the area
(Master Plan, Figures 5, 6, and 7).
Pedestrian and bicycle systems and transit access should be provided throughout the Town Center,
with a continuous walkway and travel way provided from Airport Road and Route 29 North.
Pedestrian activity is encouraged. Sidewalks on both sides of streets built ten (10) feet wide or
greater should be provided in high-density areas, with four (4) feet minimum width on some streets
elsewhere as contemplated in the Master Plan.
A park and ride lot should be established near the Town Center area.
A network of subsidiary cross streets linking all major roads in a street block system should be
established throughout the larger site. Linkages shall be made to existing developed areas where
possible (Deerwood, Forest Springs).
Grade separated vehicular cmssi~ of Route 29 are recommended at Timberwood Boulevard and
Hollymead Drive. Bi~cl~pedestrian facilities shall be provided as part of grade separated crossings
to provide pedestrian connectivity between the east and west sides of Route 29. These should be
located at or near Timberwood Boulevard and Hotlymead Drive. Sidewalks and bike facilities shall
also be provided to link to planned facilities along Airport Road as contemplated in the Master Plan.
PUBLIC SPACE AND PUBUC FACmES/SERVICES
Open space, recreation areas and public spaces shall be provided to serve patrons, employees, and
community residents. Development of public open space/features such as a public square, traffic
circles, and "pocket park(s)" should be provided throughout the Town Center area,
A g~ shall be established along the stream forming the western and so.hem botmdary of the
Town Center and should include ~alki-ng and bike trails and other features/amer~'e& This
greenway and associated trails should extend across Route 29 to link to the residential areas east of
Route 29 and ultimately to the proposed greenway along Powell Creek.
The Community Facilities Plan indicates a need for a public library and police substation in the
Hotlymead Community. The Town Center may be a desirable location for these ~ other such
public facilities.
Space shall be mede available for a recycling center (not counted against square footage limits).
ENVIRONMENT
Regional stonnwater facir~ies should be established to serve this portion of the Hollymead
Community.
Exemplary specimen or old growth trees that may exist in this area should be preserved to the
extent practicable.
Area landscaping shall minimize water requirements.
7
LEWIS AND CLARK FESTIVAL DAY
~/ttEREJS, Albemarle County is the birthplace of Meriwether Lewis and home to many sites that were
influential to his l~fe and upbringing; and
Albemarle County is home to Monticello, residence of Thomas Jefferson who chartered the
Corps of Discovery and directed its exploration of the west; and
some of the planning, ouOqtting and training of leaders of the Corps of Discover occurred within
Albemarle County; and
~REAS, many of the art~facts of the expedition, as collected and catalogued by members of the Corps of
Discovery, were permanently displayed at Monticello in Albemarle County; and
Albemarle County is a sponsor of the Lewis and Clark Festival which will be celebrated on
October 13 and 14, 200I, and is an active participant in the upcoming bicentennial observance
of the Lewis and Clark Expedition which will begin in Jamtary, 2003;
NOW, THEREFORE,
I, Sally tt. Thomas, Chairman, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors, do hereby recognize
OCTOBER 13, 2001 as
LEWIS AND CLARK FESTIVAL DA Y
and call its importance to the attention of all our c~tizens and encourage
community members to participate fully in the wide range of available events
and activities.
Signed and sealed this 10th day of October, 2001.
CHAIRMAN
ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
FAX (434) 972-4126
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Depar~nent of Building Code and Zonf~g Services
401 Mclntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
TELEPHONE (434) 296-5832
TTD (434) 972-4012
October 3, 2001
Roger W. Ray
1717-2B Allied Street
Charlottesville, VA 22903
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AND PARCELS- Tax
Map 122, Parcel 12A and Tax Map 122, Parcel 31 (Property of Judith B. Bushkin)
Section 10.3.1
Dear Mr. Ray:
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the title information for the above-noted
properties. It is the County Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination
that Tax Map 122, Parcel 12A is comprised of three (3) separate parcels. Old Lot 6
contains five (5) theoretical development rights. Old Lot 7 contains (five) 5 theoretical
development rights. The portion of Old Lot 8 contains 3 theoretical development rights.
Tax Map 122, Parcel 31 is comprised of five (5) separate parcels. Old Lot 1 contains
five (5) theoretical development rights. Old Lot 2 contains five (5) theoretical
development rights. Old Lot 3 contains five (5) theoretical development dghts. Old Lot 4
contains five (5) theoretical development rights. Old Lot 5 contains five (5) theoretical
development rights. The basis for this determination is provided below.
Our records indicate Tax Map 122, Parcel 12A contains 95.886 acres and no (0)
dwellings.The most recent deed for this parcel is recorded in Deed Book 1216, page
236. The parcel is not in an Agricultural and Forestal District.
Our records indicate Tax Map 122, Parcel 31 contains 203.757 acres and two (2)
dwellings. The most recent deed for this parcel is recorded in Deed Book 1216, page
236. The parcel is not in an Agricultural and Forestai District.
Deed Book 279, page 384, dated June 19, 1948, divided five tracts of land totaling
194.1 acres between J. Harris Phillips & Mallie V. Phillips and Grant Baker & Pauline W.
Baker. These parcels are shown on a plat by Hugh F;,.Simms recorded in Deed Book
269, page 328 - 329. In this transaction Gene Baker obtained Lots 6 and 7 and a small
h\DEPT~Building & ZoninCDetermin of Parcel\Whitehall 122- 12A & 31 .doc
10-04-0'1 AIl:10 tN
Whitehall Farm
October 3, 2001
Page 2
portion off the eastern boundary of Lot 8, composing in the aggregate 94 % acres. This
property is now identified as Parcel 12A on Tax Map 122.
Deed Book 449, page 131 is the most recent deed for both Parcel 12A and Parcel 31
recorded prior to the date of adoption of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
(December 10, 1980). This deed, dated August 6, 1968 conveyed approximately 300
acres known as Whitehall Farm from Wilfred~Lloyd-Reese & Eirwen H. Lloyd-Reese to
Kuhrt Wieneke & Helen L. Wieneke. The deed notes that the tract is composed of two
parcels of land described in part as follows:
Parcel #1: All that certain parcel of land containing 205.5 acres, more or less,
situated on the West side of State Highway 20, now known as No. 795, and more
particularly described as Lots 1,2, 3, 4 and 5 on a plat made by Hugh F. Simms
and Son, which is recorded the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle
County in Deed Book 269, page 329. This parcel is the same property as that
conveyed to Wilfred Lloyd-Reese & Eirwen H. Lloyd-Reese by deed dated
February 25, 1952, recorded in said Clerk's Office in Deed Book 299, page 304.
Lots 1,2, 3, 4 and 5, shown on the above referenced plat, recorded in Deed Book 269,
page 329 comprise what is now identified as Parcel 31 on Tax Map 122.
Parcel #2: All that certain parcel of land adjacent to Parcel #1 containing 94 %
acres, more or less, situated on the East side of State Route 712 (also known as
Rectory Road), as shown and designated on a plat made by Hugh F. Simms and
Son, C.L.S., dated June, 1948 which is recorded in said Clerk's Office in Deed
Book 279, page 386. This parcel is composed of Lots 6 and7 and a small portion
off the eastern boundary of Lot 8, as shown on the aforementioned plat in said
Clerk's Office in Deed Book 269, page 329. This parcel is the same property as
that conveyed to Wilfred Lloyd-Reese & Eirwen H. Lloyd-Reese by deed dated
June 18, 1952, recorded in said Clerk's Office in Deed Book 301, page 7.
Lots 6 and 7 and a small portion of Lot 8 shown on the above referenced plat, recorded
in Deed Book 269, page 328 comprise what is now identified as Parcel 12A on Tax Map
122. This is the same property conveyed to Baker by deed recorded in Deed Book 279,
page 384,
Deed Book 724, page 36, dated August 11, 1981 conveyed approximately 300 acres
known as Whitehall Farm from Kuhrt Wieneke & Helen L. Wieneke as tenants by the
entirety to Kuhrt Wieneke & Helen L. Wieneke as tenants in common. This is the same
property conveyed to Wilfred Lloyd-Reese'& Eirwen H. Lloyd-Reese by deed dated
August 6, 1968, recorded in Deed Book 449, page 131. The property is described in
h\DEP~Building & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Whitehall 122- 12A & 31.doc
Whitehall Farm
October 3, 2001
Page 3
this deed as being composed of two parcels. Parcel #1 containing 205.5 acres and
comprised of Lots 1,2, 3, 4 and 5 on the plat by Hugh Simms recorded in Deed Book
269, page 329. Parcel #2 containing 94 % acres and comprised of Lots 6, 7 and a small
portion of 8 on a plat by Hugh Simms recorded in Deed Book 269, page 328. The
description also references Deed Book 279, page 384, dated June 19, 1948
Deed Book 1216, page 236, dated March 12, 1992 conveyed approximately 300 acres
from the estate of Helen L. Wieneke to Judith B. Bushkin. This is the same property
conveyed from Kuhrt Wieneke & Helen L. Wieneke as tenants by the entirety to Kuhrt
Wieneke & Helen L. Wieneke as tenants in common. Again, the property is described in
this deed as being composed of two parcels. Parcel #1 containing 205.5 acres and
comprised of Lots 1,2, 3, 4 and 5 on the plat by Hugh Simms recorded in Deed Book
269, page 329. Parcel #2 containing 94 % acres and comprised of Lots 6, 7 and a small
portion of 8 on a plat by Hugh~ Simms recorded in Deed Book 269, page 328. Attached
to this deed is a plat by Gloe~kner & Osborne, Inc., dated November 21, 1988 showing
the property as 299.643 acres and being comprised of Lots 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and a
small portion of 8.
There have been no off-conveyances from either Parcel 12 A or Parcel 31 since this
transaction. None of the above transactions served to combine the lots. Therefore, Lots
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and a 6.5 acre portion of Lot 8 shown on plats recorded in Deed Book
269, pages 328 - 329 and Deed Book 1216, pages 240 - 241 are determined to be
"parent parcels", each with a full compliment of development rights.
These parcels are entitled to the noted development rights if all other applicable
regulations can be met. These development dghts are theoretical in nature but do
represent the maximum number of lots containing less than twenty one acres allowed to
be created by right. In addition to the development right lots, a "parent parcel" may
create as many parcels containing a minimum, of twenty one acres as it has land to
make.
If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have a right to appeal it within thirty days
of the date notice of this determination is given, in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of
the Code of Virginia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final
and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning Administrator
and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the grounds for the
appeal. An appeal application must be completed and filed along with the fee of $95.
The date notice of this determination was given is the same as the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
I:\DEP'P. Building& Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Whitehall 122- 12A & 31 .doc
Whitehall Farm
October 3, 2001
Page 4
Sincerely,
John Shepherd
Manager of Zoning Administration
Copies: Judith B. Bushkin
6670 Blenheim Road
Scottsville, VA 24590
James J. Egan
1515 Jefferson Davis Highway
Arlington, VA 22202
Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Ella Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors
Reading Files
I:\DEPT~Building & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Whitehall 122- 12A & 31 .doc
FAX I804) 972-4126
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Building Code and Zoni~ Services
401 Mclntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
TELEPHONE (804) 296-5832
TTD (804) 972-4012
October 1,2001
Massie E. and Joyce B. Hughes
2703 Craig's Store Road
Afton, VA 22920
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AND PARCELS- Tax
Map 84, Parcel 57 and Tax Map 84, Parcel 58 (Property of Massie E. and Joyce B.
Hughes) Section 10.3.1
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hughes:
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the title information for the above-noted
properties. It is the County Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination
that Tax Map 84, Parcel 57 contains five (5) theoretical development rights. Tax Map
84, Parcel 58 contains five (5) theoretical development rights. The basis for this
determination is provided below.
Our records indicate Tax Map 84, Parcel 57 contains 29.200 acres and one (1)
dwelling. The most recent deed for this parcel is recorded in Deed Book 478, page 166.
The-Parcel is not in an Agricultural and Forestal District.
Deed Book 478, page 166 is the most recent deed for this property recorded prior to the
date of adoption .of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance (December 10, 1980). This
deed, dated October 12, 1970, conveyed 29.2 acres from Julius H. Craig & Teora O.
Craig to Massie E. Hughes and Joyce B. Hughes. There have been no off-conveyances
since this transaction. Therefore, Tax Map 84, Parcel 57 is determined to have five (5)
development rights.
Our records indicate Tax Map 84, Parcel 58 contains 89.62 acres and no dwellings.
The most recent deed for this parcel is recorded in Deed Book 438, page 305. The
parcel is not in an Agricultural and Forestal District.
Deed Book 438, page 305 is the most recent deed for this property recorded prior to the
date of adoption of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance (December 10, 1980). This
deed, dated December 28, 1967, conveyed 89.62 acres from Betty J. Johnson to
Massie E. Hughes and Joyce B. Hughes.
I:\DEP~Building & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Hughes 84-57&58 ACE.doc
t0-02-01 P72:05 tN'
Massie E. and Joyce B. Hughes
October 1,2001
Page 2
There have been no off-conveyances since the above-transaction. The tax map shows
a road traversing Parcel 58. However, this road is not in the secondary road system. It
does not sever the property so as to create an additional parcel under the Sanford case.
Therefore, Tax Map 84, Parcel 58 is determined to be one (1) parcel with five (5)
development rights.
These parcels are entitled to the noted development rights if all other applicable
regulations can be met.'These development rights are theoretical in nature but do
represent the maximum number of lots containing less than twenty-one acres allowed to
be created by right. In addition to the development right lots, a "parent parcel" may
create as many parcels containing a minimum of twenty-one acres as it has land to
make.
If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have a right to appeal it within thirty days
of the date notice of this determination is given, in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of
the Code of Virginia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final
and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning Administrator
and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the grounds for the
appeal. An appeal application must be completed and filed along with the fee of $95:
The date notice of this determination was given is the same as the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
,John Shepherd
Manager of Zonin§ Administration
Copies:
Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Ella Carey, Clerk Board of SUpervisors
McChesney Goodall, ACE Program Coordinator
Reading Files
h\DEPT~Buitding & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Hughes 84-57&58 ACE.doc
FAX (804) 972-4126
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Building Code and Zoni~ Services
401 Mclntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
TELEPHONE (804) 296-5832
TYD (804) 972-4012
October 1, 2001
Robert M. and Patricia A. Byrom
6584 Blackwelis Hollow Road
Crozet, VA 22932
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AND PARCELS- Tax
Map 6, Parcel 16 and Tax Map 6, Parcel 29 (Property of Robert M. and Patricia A.
Byrom known as Cottonwood Farm) Section 10.3.1
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Byrom:
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the title information for the above-noted
properties. It is the County Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination
that Tax Map 6, Parcel 16 contains five (5) theoretical development rights. Tax Map 6,
Parcel 29 consists of two (2) separate parcels; the residue of former parcel 28 and the
residue of the former parcel 29 as shown on the 1980 tax map. The residue of former
Parcel 28, containing 198.53 acres contains no (0) developmentrights. The residue of
former Parcel 29, containing 285.71 acres contains no (0) development rights. The
basis for this determination is provided below.
Our records indicate Tax Map 6, Parcel 16 contains 115.350 acres and no (0)
dwellings. The most recent deed for this parcel is recorded in Deed Book 1114, page
507. The parcel is not in an Agricultural and Forestal District.
The most recent deed for these three parcels prior to the date of adoption of the
Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance (December 10, 1980) is recorded in Deed Book
690, page 844. This deed of correction, dated March 20, 1980, conveyed 817 acres
from Robert M. Byrom and Patricia A. Byrom, tenants in common, to Robert M. Byrom
and Patricia A. Byrom jointly as tenants by the entirety with full rights of survivorship.
This property is identified as the same three tracts conveyed bY George and Ruth Huff
to Robert and Patricia Byrom on September 17, 1964 by a deed recorded in Deed Book
402, page 22.
Deed Book 402, page 22, dated September 17, 1964, conveyed 817 acres from George
and Ruth Huff to Robert and Patricia Byrom. That property was described as being the
I:\DEP-RBuilding & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Byrom 6-16 & 29 ACE.doc
Cottonwood Farm Determination
October 1,2001
Page 2
same land in all respects that was conveyed to Georg~ Huff by three deeds. One of
those was the deed of Jack Kegley and D. B. Marshall dated July 17, 1964 conveying
117 acres recorded in Deed Book 399, page 555. This parcel was identified on the 1980
tax map as Parcel 16.
Deed Book 1114, page 507, dated July 11, 1990, is a deed of exchange between
Henley Forest, Inc. and Robert M. Byrom and Patricia A. Byrom. The plat recorded with
the deed by Roudabush, Gale and Assoc., dated May 24, 1990 and approved on June
9, 1990 has a note stating that the rights of division are not affected by this plat. The
residue acreage is shown to be 115.35 acres. The deed makes no reference to the
chain of title. However, the plat references Deed Book 402, page 22. There have been
no off-conveyances since the above transaction.
The tax map shows a road traVersing Parcel 16. However, this road is not in the
secondary road system. It does not sever the property so as to create an additional
parcel under the Sanford case.
Based on this history, Tax Map 6, Parcel 16 is determined to have five (5) development
rights. This parcel is entitled to these development rights if all Other applicable
regulations can be met. These development rights are theoretical in nature but do
represent the maximum number of lots containing less than twenty one acres allowed to
be created by right.
Our records indicate Tax Map 6, Parcel 29 contains 484.240 acres and one (1)
dwelling. The most recent deed for this parcel is recorded in Deed Book 1306, page
729. The parcel is not in an Agricultural and Forestal District.
The most recent deed for this property prior to the date of adoption of the Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance (December 10, 1980) is also recorded in Deed Book 690,
page 844 which is described above. That deed referenced three tracts of land described
in Deed Book 402, page 22, also described above.
Deed Book 402, page 22, dated September 17, 1964 conveyed 817 acres from George
and Ruth Huff to Robert and Patricia Byrom. That property was described as being the
same land in all respects that was conveyed to George Huff by three deeds. Two of
those deeds conveyed separate tracts identified on the 1980 tax map as Parcel 28 and
Parcel 29. These are described as follows:
Deed of Lucy Walton and others dated December 27, 1957 conveying 345 acres
recorded in Deed Book 337, page 305. This parcel appeared on the 1980 tax
map as parcel 28 or 29.
l:\DEPT~Building & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Byrom 6-16 & 29 ACE.doc
Cottonwood Farm Determination
October 1, 2001
Page 3
Deed of Ruby Knight and Husband dated December 27, 1957 conveying 355
acres recorded in Deed Book 337, page 193. This parcel appeared on the 1980
tax map as parcel 28 or 29.
Deed Book 838, page 9, dated May 15, 1985 conveyed 38:68 acres from to Robert M.
Byrom and Patricia A. Byrom to Christopher Lee Byrom. This property is designated as
the Residence Tract on a plat by Morris Foster dated December 15, 1985. As a result of
this conveyance, notes on the plat stated that the residue of Parcel 28 contained 307.22
acres and the residue of Parcel 29 contained 334.1.7 acres. The plat was silent with
respect to development rights assigned to the Residence Tract.
Deed Book 1,306, page 729, dated February 14, 1993 is a certificate of plat. The plat by
Morris foster, revised on February 15, 1993 shows Tracts A, B, C, and D, a division of
Parcels 28 and 29, the property of Robert M. Byrom and Patricia A. Byrom.
Tract A, containing 42.87 acres was divided from Parcel 29. It was assigned 2
development rights.
Tract B, containing 44.27 acres was divided from Parcel 29. It was assigned 3
development rights.
Tract C, containing 43.40 acres was divided from Parcel 28. It was assigned 3
development rig hts.
Tract D, containing 65.29 acres was divided from Parcel 28. It was assigned 2
development rights.
The assignment of these ten development rights exhausted the development rights
associated with the original parcel 28 and the original parcel 29. These two parcels may
create as many lots containing a minimum of twenty one acres as they have land to
make.
If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have a right to appeal it within thirty days
of the date notice of this determination is given, in accOrdance with Section 15.2-2311 of
the Code of Virginia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final
and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning Administrator
and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the grounds for the
apPeal. An appeal application must be completed and filed along with the fee of $95.
The date notice of this determination was given is the same as the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
l:\DEPTkBuilding & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Byrom 6-16 & 29 ACE.doc
Cottonwood Farm Determination
October 1,2001
Page 4
Sincerely,
John Shepherd
Manager of Zoning Administration
Copies: Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Ella Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors
McChesney Goodall, ACE Program Coordinator
Reading Files
h\DEPT~Building & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Byrom 6-16 & 29 ACE.doc
FAX (804) 972-4126
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Building Code and Zonf~g Services
401 Mclntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, V~rginia 22902-4596
TELEPHONE (804) 296-5832
TTD (804) 972-4012
October 1,2001
Mehring Family Limited Partnership
3917 Hungrytown Road
Covesville, VA 22931
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AND PARCELS- Tax
Map 97, Parcel 21B, (Property of Mehring Family Limited Partnership) Section
10.3.1
Dear Mehring Family Limited Partnership:
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the title information for the above-noted
property. It is the County Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination that
Tax Map 97, Parcel 21B consists of two (2) separate parcels. The bulk of the property,
located on the east side of Route 698, contains two (2) theoretical development rights.
There is no limitation on the size of the parcels that may be created using these
development rights. The sliver of land located on the west side of Route 698 near
Parcel 21 is a separate parcel. It contains one (1) or two (2) development rights
depending on the acreage. The basis for this determination is provided below.
Our records indicate Tax Map 97, Parcel 21B contains 565.363 acres and no (0)
dwellings. The most recent deed for this parcel is recorded in Deed Book 1507, page
364. The parcel is included in the Chalk Mountain Agricultural and Forestal District.
Deed Book 335, page 590, dated November 7, 1957, conveyed 418.5 acres from Harry
H. Powell & Amanda J. Powell to Walter H. Mehring, Jr. & Sara C. Mehring. This
property is described as being assessed as three tracts of 210 acres, 42 acres and
166.5 acres. These tracts are described as follows:
(1) 210 acres conveyed to Joseph S. Hudson by Shepherd Eades by deed dated June
9, 1954, recorded in Deed Book 52, page 19. This is generally known as the Eades
Property.
(2) About 166 acres conveyed to Joseph S. Hudson by the will of Joseph Wingfield,
recorded in Will Book 28, page 97. This is designated as the two upper mountain
fields with woodland attached.
h\DEPT~Buitding & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Mehring 97-21B ACE.doc
70-02-01 P72:05 IN
Mehring Family Partnership
October 1,2001
Page 2
(3) A tract of land assessed as 42 acres and conveye(~-as 100 acres to Joseph S.
Hudson by George Perkins, Trustee, and S. A. Burch & wife, recorded in Deed Book
95, page 283.
Deed Book 338, page 562 is a deed of correction dated February 15, 1958 that relies on
a plat by T. W. Saunders dated January 1, 1958. The deed conveyed 611.2 acres from
Harry H. Powell & Amanda J. Powell to Walter H. Mehring, Jr. & Sara C. Mehring. This
acreage figure more accurately describes the property conveyed to Walter and Sara
Mehring by a deed recorded in Deed Book 335, page 590. There is no record of any
deed recorded between Deed Book 335, page 590 and Deed Book 338, page 562 that
would have conveyed this property back to Powell prior to recording the deed of
correction. The January 1, 1958 plat by T.W. Saunders, recorded with this deed is titled,
"Plat Showing Tract of Land...for Walter H. Jr. and Sara Mehring." Although this deed
references Deed Book 335, page 590, it identifies the property as "a tract of land."
There is no reference to this parcel being comprised of separate tracts. County real
estate records show that three tracts were combined in 1959 on the basis of this deed
and plat. The tracts 'were not combined for the convenience of the County. Based on
these factors, this tract is determined to have been combined into one parcel.
This deed also served to establish a boundary between the property of Walter H.
Mehring, Jr. & Sara C. Mehring and the property of J. B. Toms & Dultry M. Toms, Ashby
S. Toms & Mamie T. Toms and B. T. Toms & Mintie W. Toms.
Deed Book 650, page 752 is the most recent deed for this property recorded prior to the
date of adoption of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, December 10, 1980. This
deed, dated July 7, 1978 conveyed 11.09 acres from Walter H. Mehring, Jr. & Sara C.
Mehring to Walter H. Mehring, Ill & Paula H. Mehring. This is a portion of the property of
Walter and Sara Mehring, containing 611.2 acres shown a plat by T. W. Saunders
recorded in Deed Book 338, page 564. The 11.09 acres is identified on Tax Map 97 as
Parcel 21A. The accompanying plat by R. O. Snow & Associates showed the residue
retained 600.14 acres.
Deed Book 750, page 402, dated October 20, 1982 conveyed 11.48 acres from Walter
H. Mehring, Jr. & Sara C. Mehring to Peter R. Mehring & Leslie M. Mehring. The 11.48
acre tract is identified on Tax Map 97 as Parcel 22. The accompanying plat by R. O.
Snow & R. W. Ray showed the residue retained 588.60 +/- acres and four (4)
development rights.
Deed Book 1354, page 208, dated October 27, 1993 conveyed approximately 16.7acres
from Walter H. Mehring, Jr. & Sara C. Mehring to Walter H. Mehring, III & Paula H.
Mehring. This tract was described with metes and bounds. There was no plat and no
h\DEPT~Building & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Mehdng 97-21B ACE.doc
Mehring Family Partnership
October 1,2001
Page 3
mention of development rights in the deed. The deed ~l~id note that this parcel was to be
combined with Walter and Paula Mehdng's existing parcel. After this conveyance the
residue retained 571.9 +/- acres and four (4) development rights.
Deed Book 1402, page 640, dated April 27, 1994 conveyed approximately 16.7acres
from Walter H. Mehring, III & Paula H. Mehring to Walter H. Mehring, Jr. & Sara C.
Mehring. This tract is identified as the same Property that was conveyed to Walter and
Paula Mehring by Walter and Sara Mehring recorded in Deed Book 1354, page 208.
After this conveyance the residue contained 588.60 +/- acres and four (4) development
rights.
Deed Book 1479, page 244 dated June 13, 1995 conveyed 15.517 acres from Walter H.
Mehring, Jr. & Sara C. Mehring to Walter H. Mehring III and Paula H. Mehring. This tract
was combined with Parcel 21A on a plat by Morris Foster dated May 10, 1995. No
development rights were conveyed with this transaction. After this conveyance the
residue contained 573.08 +/- acres and four (4) development rights.
Deed Book 1479, page 250 dated June 27, 1995 is a deed of gift that conveyed 565 +/-
acres from Walter H. Mehring, Jr. & Sara C. Mehring to the Mehring Family Limited
Partnership. This conveyance included all of the 611.2 acres shown on the plat
recorded at Deed Book 338, page 562 except for the following:
(1) 7.722 acres conveyed with this deed and shown on a plat by Morris Foster
dated June 15, 1995 that is attached to this deed. This parcel is assigned two (2)
development rights. A note on the plat stated the residue may be divided into two
parcels not to exceed 11.796 acres in aggregate area. This tract is identified as
Parcel 21 on Tax Map 97. The residue is identified as Parcel 21B. After this
conveyance the residue contained 565.36 +/- acres and two (2) development
rights.
(2) 11.09 acres conveyed on July 7, 1978 and recorded in Deed Book 650, page
752. This is a parent created prior to the adoption of the ordinance. No
development rights were used to create this parcel. This is a portion of Parcel
21A.
(3) 15.517 acres conveyed on June 13, 1995 and recorded in Deed Book 1,479,
page 244. The plat, approved on June 9, 1995 showed that this tract was added
to Parcel 21A. No (0) development rights were conveyed with this property.
(4) 11.48 acres conveyed on October 20, 1982 and recorded in Deed Book 750,
page 402. One (1) development right was used to create this parcel. This is
identified on Tax Map 97 as Parcel 22.
h\DEPT~Building & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Mehdng 97-21B ACE.doc
Mehring Family Partnership
October 1,2001
Page 4
It is determined that the limitation on the acreage of fu;~Jre parcels divided from Parcel
21B was noted on the plat attached to this deed is in error. The "31 acre rule" in section
10.3.1 does not apply to parcels divided between the effective date of the ordinance and
November 8, 1989. Parcel 22 was divided from the subject property on October 20,
1982.
Deed Book 1507, page 364, dated November 28, 1995 is a deed of correction that
conveyed the same 565 +/- acres from Walter H. Mehring, Jr. & Sara C. Mehring to the
Mehring Family Limited Partnership as was described in Deed Book 1479, page 250.
The deed was corrected to reflect that the conveyance was not a gift but a transfer to
the grantee in exchange for partnership interests of equal value to the property herein
conveyed.
This property includes a small sliver of land on the west side of State Route 698. This is
determined to be a separate parcel of land in accord with Ann S. Sanford v. Board of
Zoning Appeals of Albemarle County, Virginia. The acreage of this parcel is not shown
on any of the above referenced plats.
Based on this history, the portion of Tax Map 97, Parcel 21B located on the east side of
State Route 698 is determined to have two (2) development rights. The parcel on the
west side of State Route 698 has one (1) or two (2) development rights depending on
the acreage. These parcels are entitled to the noted development rights if all other
applicable regulations can be met. These development rights are theoretical in nature
but do represent the maximum number of lots containing less than twenty one acres
allowed to be created by right. In addition to the development right lots, a "parent parcel"
may create as many parcels containing a minimum of twenty-one acres as it has land to
make.
If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have a right to appeal it within thirty days
of the date notice of this determination is given, in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of
the Code of Virginia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final
and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning Administrator
and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the grounds for the
appeal. An appeal application must be completed and filed along with the fee of $95.
The date notice of this determination was given is the same as the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Manager of Zoning Administration
h\DEP'~Building & Zoning\Determin of Parcel~lehring 97-21B ACE.doc
Mehring Family Partnership
October 1, 2001
Page 5
Copies: G,~y Carver, Real Estate Department
~Efla Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors
McChesney Goodall, ACE Program Coordinator
Reading Files
h\DEP~Building & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Mehring 97-21B ACE.doc
FAX (804) 972-4126
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Building Code and Zoni'~'g Services
401 Mclntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
TELEPHONE (804} 296-5832
TTD (804) 972-4012
October 1,2001
Millwood Land Trust U/A;
Elizabeth M. Gildea, R.E. Gildea, Jr., & Hugh Morrison Gildea, Trustees
751 Millwood Lane
Cobham, VA 22947
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AND PARCELS- Tax
Map 65, Parcel 86 (Property of Millwood Land Trust U/A) Section 10.3.1
Dear Millwood Land Trust Trustees:
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the title information for the above-noted
property. It is the County Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination that
Tax Map 65, Parcel 86 contains five (5) theoretical development rights. The basis for
this determination is provided below.
Our records indicate Tax Map 65, Parcel 86 contains 105.360 acres and one (1)
dwelling. The most recent deed for this parcel is recorded in Deed Book 1512, page
479. The parcel is included in the Kinloch Agricultural and Forestal District.
The most recent deed for this property prior to the date of adoption of the Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance (December 10, 1980) is recorded in Deed Book 387, page
588, dated May 3, 1963. This deed conveyed 105.36 acres from Frances Page Mann to
R. E. Gildea and Elizabeth M. Gildea. A plat by William Roudabush, dated November
1962, that identifies this property as Millwood is recorded in this book on pages 592 and
593.
Deed Book 1512, page 479, dated December 29, 1995, conveyed three parcels of land
from Elizabeth M. Gildea, Grantor to Elizabeth M..Gildea, R. E. Gildea, Jr., and Hugh
Morrison Gildea, Trustees of the Millwood Land Trust. Parcel Two is described as
containing 105.36 acres and being the same property that was conveyed by the deed
recorded in Deed Book 387, page 588.
Based on this history, Tax Map 65, Parcel 86 is entitled to five (5) development rights if
all other applicable regulations can be met. These development rights are theoretical in
h\DEP'RBuilding & Zoning\Determin of Parcel\Millwood 65-86 ACE.doc
t0-02-01 P12:05 N
Millwood Determination
October 1, 2001
Page 2
nature but do represent the maximum number of lots ~ontaining less than twenty-one
acres allowed to be created by right. In addition to the development right lots, a "parent
parcel" may create as many parcels containing a minimum of twenty-one acres as it has
land to make.
If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have a right to appeal it within thirty days
of the date notice of this determination is given, in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of
the Code of Virginia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final
and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning Administrator
and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the grounds for the
appeal. An appeal application must be completed and filed along with the fee .of $95.
The date notice of this determination was given is the same as the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
John Shepherd
Manager of Zoning Administration
Copies: Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Ella Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors
McChesney Goodall, ACE Program Coordinator
Reading Files
h\DEPT~Building & Zbning\Determin of Parcel\Millwood 65-86 ACE.doc
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing - FY 01 Budget Amendment
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Public Hearing on Proposed FY01 Budget Amendment
in the amount of $935,387.60 and requested approval
for the amendment and Appropriations #20083, 20084,
20085, 20087, 20088, 20089, 20090.
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden; Ms. White
AGENDA DATE:
October 10, 2001
ACTION: X
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
ITEM NUMBER:
INFORMATION:
INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND:
The Code of Virginia {}15.2-2507 stipulates that the County must hold a public hearing to amend its budget if the
additional appropriated amounts exceed 1% of the original budget or $500,000, whichever is the lesser. The
Code section applies to all funds, i.e., Capital, E-911, School Self-Sustaining, etc., not just the General Fund or
County's adopted operating budget.
DISCUSSION:
This proposed FY01 Budget Amendment totals $935,387.60. The chart below breaks out the estimated
expenditures and revenues for the amendment in the General Fund, School Fund, and various Grants/Programs
Funds.
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
General Fund
Judicial
Public Safety
Engineering/Public Works
Parks, Recreation, Culture
Refunds
Total Expenditures- General Fund
$ 11,000.00
243,000.00
1,000.00
9,000.00
89,000.00
$ 353,000.00
Education Operating Fund
$ 310,978.10
GrantslProgramslProjects Funds
M.P.O. Grant
Traffic Safety Grant
Family Support Program
Comprehensive Services Act
Towe Park
Total Expenditures - Other Funds
$ 26,500.00
3,809.50
90,000.00
150,000.00
1,100.00
$ 271,409.50
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES $ 935,387.60
ESTIMATED REVENUE
General Fund
Local Revenue
State Revenues
Fund Balance
Total Revenues - General Fund
$ 1,450.00
9,000.00
344,000.00
$ 354,450.00
Education Funds
Local Revenue
Total Revenues - Education Funds
$ 54,518.02
$ 54,518.02
Grants/Programs/Projects Funds
Local Revenues
State Revenues
Federal Revenues
Fund Balance
Total Revenues - Other Funds
235,489.00
133,056.58
137,369.08
20,504.92
$ 526,419.58
Total Estimated Revenue- All Funds
$ 935,387.60
This budget amendment consists of seven appropriations that will need approval subsequent to the public hearing.
A detailed description of these appropriations is provided on Attachment A.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests approval of the FY01 Budget Amendment in the amount of $935,387.60 and approval of
Appropriation #20083, 20084, 20085, 20087, 20088, 20089, and 20090 as detailed on the appropriation forms,
which can be found in the Clerk's Office.
01.190
APPROPRIATION #20083
Appropriations
Attachment A
$150,000.00
Comprehensive Services Act
Mandated services for special education (residential and non-residential) exceeded projections. Funding will
be provided by additional state revenues and a transfer from the School Fund for their share of the additional
expenses.
APPROPRIATION #20084
$26,500.00
Funding for Metropolitan Planning Organization Grant
The 2000/01 Unified Planning Work Program was prepared by the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
for the Charlottesville Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization. The program includes transportation studies
and ongoing planning activities, including a Transportation Improvement Program that lists roads and transit
improvement for the upcoming three years, and the 20-year Charlottesville Area Transportation study updated
every five years. Other activities address traffic congestion, city-county bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and
public-private transit development.
Activity in the later part of the fiscal year requires approval of expenses incurred for these studies.
APPROPRIATION #20085
$3,809.50
Funding for Traffic Safety Grant
Traffic activity continues to increase in the County of Albemarle. The Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
recognizes this problem and has funded grants using federal pass through monies to increase traffic enforcement
through selective enforcement assignments employing officers working overtime. This grant commenced October
1, 1999 and extended through September 30, 2001. A balance of $3,809.50 remains to be appropriated in
2000/01. There is no local match.
APPROPRIATION #20087
$ 90,000.00
Additional Funding for Family Support Program
Expenditures exceeded projections; fully covered by additional federal revenues.
APPROPRIATION #20088
29,959.58
Funding for School Programs
The Preschool Grant was not fully expended in FY 99/00. The grant carryover amount of $19,959.58 retained by
the State may be appropriated for FY 00/01. These funds will help cover additional preschool summer school
expenses.
The Regional Education Program (PREP) was funded in the school budget for FY 00/01 in the amount of
$1,251,694.00. It is requested that the fund balance of $10,000 be re-appropriated for FY 00/01 to help cover
additional expenses in the PREP Program.
APPROPRIATION #20089 $281,018.52
Funding for School Programs
The Albemarle County Public Schools Summer Program incurred additional expenditures and received additional
revenue exceeding the budget appropriation in the amount of $42,000.00. These additional revenues will be used
to pay teacher salaries.
The Adult Basic Education Program had a shortfall of $922.00 for FY00-01. The program mandates a 15% match
of local funds. It is requested that $922.00 be transferred from the School Fund to adequately meet the grant
mandate.
The General Adult Education Program is a federally funded program that provides instructional services to meet
the needs of adults who are working toward a high school diploma. The actual revenues received exceeded the
anticipated revenues by $4,768.00. There is also a fund balance from FY99-00 in the amount of $3,317.90.
These funds will help to cover the expenses of General Adult Education for FY00-01.
Albemarle County Public Schools (ACPS) is a partner in Virginia's four-year old Preschool Initiative, Bright Stars.
As part of this partnership ACPS provides transportation and meals (breakfast, lunch, snack) to participating
children through the United States Department of Agriculture's Child Care and Adult Day Care Program. The
program reimburses the school division for meals based on the student's participation and qualification for free
or reduced priced meals. The reimbursement received was $34,823.60. There is also a fund balance from FY99-
00 in the amount of $1,538.83. These funds will help cover the Bright Stars program expenditures for FY00-01.
The Program for Seamless Transition (POST) grant award was not fully expended in FY99-00. The grant has a
fund balance in the amount of $5,648.19. These funds need to be re-appropriated in FY00-01.
The Vehicle Maintenance Fund exceeded its appropriated budget dudng FY00-01 due to higher than anticipated
fuel costs and greater usage. This fund was established several years ago to remove the fuel, lubricants, and
parts expenses associated with the maintenance of outside vehicles from the School Fund. This fund contains
all of the fuel, lubricants, and parts used to repair both local government vehicles and other vehicles serviced and
fueled at the School system's repair facility. It is requested that $188,000.00 be re-appropriated to cover these
expenditures.
The Comprehensive Services Act (CSA), implemented in 1993, is the primary funding source for at-risk children
and families who are either in foster care, involved with the juvenile court system, or require residential or day
treatment services because of their special education needs. The School Division is fiscally responsible for costs
associated with providing special education services to those children served under the CSA. A final estimate of
these costs has been completed for FY00-01. There has been a steady increase in the number of children with
significant emotional or behavioral issues who reside in Albemarle County. This placed serious demands on funds
set aside to address the mandates of the CSA. Although it is difficult to predict with absolute accuracy what may
be the final expenses for the FY01-02 school year, it is assumed that will be no noticeable decrease in the demand
for these services in the foreseeable future. As projected in the financial reports provided to the Board during the
year, there has been some savings associated with the reduced enrollment for FY01-02. The funds allocated for
use for this Teacher Salary code were not required to meet expenses and, therefore, can be reallocated to meet
this unanticipated expense. It is requested that $55,596.02 be transferred from the teachers salary account to
the CSA fund.
APPROPRIATION #20090
$354,100.00
Funding for FY 00101 Over Expenditures
The following activities exceeded appropriations for FY 01:
· Juvenile Court - Salary adjustment and pay-off of accrued leave for terminating employee. Revenues to offset
costs are provided by Virginia Juvenile Justice Crime contract Act funds (VJCCA).
Shedff - Overtime wages for contracted external security activities; reimbursable overtime revenues from
these activities also exceeded projections.
Regional Jail - The FY 01 County budget was prepared based on a projected inmate census of 121,345.
However, the actual FY01 inmate census was 154,278, an increase of 27% over projections. As a result of
this, the per diem charge to the localities substantially exceeded the jail's budget projections.
Towe Park - Repairs and maintenance exceeded projections by $1,100. Local shares increased due to a
shortfall in program revenues.
Refunds - Increase in refunds due to PPTR (Personal Property Tax Relief). Leased vehicles must be certified
as eligible by leasing company and often this occurs after original bill is paid. Also, a large license refund was
made to a business that discontinued operations in the County.
Education - Expenditures exceeded budget in four categories: Administration - $20,000; Transportation -
$95,000; Maintenance - $150,000; Construction - $50,000. Increased fuel and utility costs are the main
factors. These costs will be offset by reduced expenditures in the Instructional category.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 00/01
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
X
YES :"
NO X
20083
FUND: C.S.A.
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITONAL FUNDING FOR FY 00/01 COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES ACT.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1551 53120 581601 C.S.A. $ 150,000.00
TOTAL $ 150,000.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1551 24000 240109 STATE FUNDS $ 96,403.98
2 1551 51000 512001 SCHOOL TRANSFER 53,596.02
TOTAL $ 150,000.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: SOCIAL SERVICES
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT 5, 2001
/,~-1/- ,~/
FISCAL YEAR: 00101
TYPE oF APPROPRIATION:
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
.., NUMBER
~" ~.:i'.-: i:.~,:~..,L-~ -i~ - -.~ :,., ·, -~- .' ~, .
. ~' ADDiTiONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
20084
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
FUND:
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR METRPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1208 81301 110000 SALARIES-REGULAR $ 2,200.00
1 1208 81301 350000 PRINTING & BINDING 100.00
1 1208 81301 600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 200.00
1 1208 81302 110000SALARIES-REGULAR 11,250.00
1 1208 81302 350000 PRINTING & BINDING 250.00
1 1208 81302 600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 500.00
I 1208 81309 110000SALARIES-REGULAR 11,250.00
1 1208 81309 350000 PRINTING & BINDING 250.00
1 12'08 81309 600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 500.00
TOTAL $ 26,500.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1208 24000 240500 GRANT REVENUE-STATE $ 1,450.00
2 1208 33000 330001 GRANT REVENUE-FEDERAL 23 600.00
2 1208 51000 512004 TRANSFER-GENERAL FUND 1,450.00
TOTAL $ 26,500.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: PLANNING
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
AUGUST 27, 2001
/o /
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 00/01
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NETM
YE8
NO
X
20085
FUND: GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1533 31013 120000 OVERTIME WAGES $ 3,448.42
1 1533 31013 21-0000 FICA 361.08
TOTAL $ 3.809.50
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1533 33000 330011 DMVGRANT $ 3,809.50
TOTAL $ 3,809.50
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: POLICE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 5, 2001
/',¢ -//- /
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL Y~R: 00101
TYPE Of APPROPRIATION:
NUMBER 20087
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND: GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITIONALFUNDING FOR FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAM.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
I 1557 53150 310000 PROF. SERVICES $ 90,000.00
TOTAL $ 90,000.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1557 33000 330001 FEDERAL REVENUE $ 90,000.00
TOTAL $ 90,000.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: SOCIAL SERVICES
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 10, 2001
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL yEAR: 00/01
TYPE OF APPROPRIATI ON:
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
X
20088
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
FUND: GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR SCHOOL PROGRAMS.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 3205 61102 132105 P/TWages $ 18,432.97
1 3205 61102 210000 FICA 1,526.61
1 3201 61102 121000 Salaries-Teacher 1,235.00
1 3201 61102 114100 Salaries-TeacherAide 8,000.00
I 3201 61102 210000 FICA 765.00
TOTAL $ 29,959.58
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 3205 33000 330111 PreschooI Grant $ 19,959.58
2 3201 51000 510100 Appr-Fund Balance 10,000.00
TOTAL $ 29,959.58
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 10, 2001
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FiscAL¥~h':'~ - oo/ol '
WPE OF APPROPRIATION: .
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
NUMBER 20089
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
YES
NO X
FUND:
SCHOO~PROGRAMS
PURPOSE OFAPPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR SCHOOLPROGRAMS.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 3310 61120 132100 P/T Wages $ 38,787.00
1 3310 61120 210000 FICA 3,213.00
1 2113 61131 580000 Mis¢ (922.00)
1 2113 93010 930000 Fund Transfer 922.00
1 3115 63322 601300 Ed/Rec Supplies 922.00
1 3133 63321 132100 P/TWages 7,512.15
1 3133 63321 210000 FICA 573.75
1 3307 61129 600200 Food Supplies 36,362.43
1 3136 61102 132100 P/TWages 5,223.19
1 3136 61102 210000 FICA 425.00
1 391.0 63241 600800 Vehicle Fuel 188,000.00
I 2100 61101 112100 Teacher Salaries (55,596.02)
1 2112 93010 930206 Transferto CSA Fund 55,596.02
TOTAL $ 281,018.52
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 3310 18000 181258 Summer Revenue $ 42,000.00
2 3115 51000 512001 Transfer-SchooIFund 922,00
2 3133 16000 161232 Revenue-Tuition 4,389.00
2 3133 24000 240240 Revenue-State 379.00
2 3133 51000 510100 Approp-Fund Balance 3,317.90
2 3307 33000 330610 USDAReimb 34,823.60
2 3307 51000 510100 Approp-Fund Balance 1,538.83
2 3136 51000 510100 Approp-Fund Balance 5,648.19
2 3910 16000 161271 Fuel Charges 188,000.00
TOTAL $ 281,018.52
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 18, 2001
-//-
APPROPRIATION REQU EST
FISCAL YEAR: 00101
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
20090
X
YES
NO X
FUND:
-GENERAL/SCHOOLS
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR FY 00101 OVER EXPENDITURES.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION
1000 21051 110000 JUVENILE COURT
1000 31020 129900 SHERIFF
1000 33020 700002 REGIONAL JAIL
1000 41030 110000 WATER RESOURCES
1000 71002 700007 TOWEPARK
1000 92010 580301 REFUNDS
1000 92010 580304 REFUNDS
1 4200 71002 331200
EDUCATION
EDUCATION
EDUCATION
EDUCATION
EDUCATION
TOWE PARK
REVENUE
AMOUNT
WAGES $ 11,000.00
O/T-REIMBURSABLE 9,000.00
234,000.00
WAG ES 1,000.00
9,000.00
TAX REFUNDS 62,000.00
BUSINESS LIC. REFUND 27,000.00
INSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION
TRANSPORTATION
MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION
(315,000.00)
2Q000.00
95,000.00
150,000.00
50.000.00
R&M-BU LDINGS 1,100.00
TOTAL $ 354,100.00
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1000 16000 160303 SHERIFF DEPT. FEES $ 9,000.00
2 1000 51000 510100 GENERAL FUND BALANCE 344,000.00
2 4200 16000 160502 TOWE PARK CITY 385.00
2 4200 16000 160503 TOWE PARK COUNTY 715.00
TOTAL $ 354,100.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 20, 2001
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing - FY 02 Budget Amendment
SU BJ ECT/PROPOSALIREQUEST:
Public Hearing on the proposed FY02 Budget
Amendment in the amount of $12,536,616.89 and
requested approval for the amendment and
Appropriation #2001010 though 2001016, #2001018
through 2001022, and #2001024 through 2001028 for
various school and local government programs.
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden; Ms. White
AGENDA DATE:
October 10, 2001
ACTION: X
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWED BY:
ITEM NUMBER:
INFORMATION:
INFORMATION:
Yes
BACKGROUN D:
The Code of Virginia {}15.2-2507 stipulates that the County must hold a public hearing to amend its current budget
if the additional appropriated amounts exceed 1% of the original budget or $500,000, whichever is the lesser. The
Code section applies to all funds, i.e., Capital, E-911, School Self-Sustaining, etc., not just the General Fund or
County's adopted operating budget.
DISCUSSION:
This proposed FY02 Budget Amendment totals $12,536,616.89.
amendment of the expenses and revenues in the funds.
The chart below breaks out the estimated
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
General Fund
Administration
Judicial
'Public Safety
Engineering/Public Works
Human Development
Parks, Recreation, Culture
Community Development
Board of Supervisors Contingency
358,554.10
17,275.00
148,336.63
172,461.46
48,620.71
37,402.20
236,918.08
fi ,000.00)
General Fund Expenditures
$1,018,568.18
Education Operating Fund
$ 19,260.00
Capital Improvement Fund
Local Government
Education
$5,718,777.82
1,162,480.62
Capital Improvement Expenditures $6,881,258.44
Grants/Programs/Project Funds
Chesapeake Bay Restoration
HUD Public Assistance Housing
Comp. Community Corrections Act
2001 Local Law Enforcement Grant
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Bright Stars Program
united Way Day Care Program
Tourism Programs/Projects
Computer Aided Dispatch Project
Storm Drainage Projects
Education Programs/Projects
Grants/Programs/Projects Expenditures
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
$ 7,540.00
1,478,070.00
564,442.00
37,814.00
20,000.00
10,000.00
529,870.00
380,841.41
413,318.69
949,281.17
226,353.00
$4,617,530.27
$12,536,616.89
ESTIMATED REVENUE
General Fund
Local Revenues
Fund Balance
Total Revenues- General Fund
Education Funds
Local Revenues
Fund Balances
Total Revenues- Education Funds
Capital Improvement Fund
Local Government
Local Revenues
State Revenues
Fund Balance
Education
Fund Balance
Total Revenues - Capital Improvement Funds
Grants/Programs/Project Funds.
Local Revenues
State Revenues
Federal Revenues
Fund Balances
Total Revenues - Other Funds
$ 93,806.00
1,369,568.18
$1,463,374.18
$ 2,750.00
6,500.00
$ 9,250.00
$ 313,336.90
54,150.33
4,436,364.93
1., 162,480.62
$ 5,966,332.78
$ 646,672.69
745,787.00
1,796,446.00
1,908,754.24
$ 5,097,659.93
Total Estimated Revenue- All Funds
$12,536,616.89
This budget amendment consists of seventeen appropriations that will need approval subsequent to the public
hearing. A detailed description of the appropriations is provided on Attachment A.
Appropriation #2001017 was previously approved at the September 12, 2001 meeting and is included with this
budget amendment to meet the statutory advertising requirement. No further action is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests approval of the FY02 Budget Amendment in the amount of $12,536,616.89 and approval of
Appropriation #2001010, 2001011, 2001012, 2001013, 2001014, 2~001~015, and 2001016,2001018, 2001019,
2001020, 2001021, 2001022, 2001024, 2001025, 2001026, 2001027, and 2001028 as detailed on the
appropriation forms, which can be found in the Clerk's Office.
01.191
APPROPRIATION #2001010
Appropriations
Attachment A
$7,540.00
Authorization to Expend Chesapeake Bay Restoration Grant
Stream buffer education has been ongoing in the County of Albemarle for some time. Stream buffer regulation
began in 1991 when the County passed its first stream buffer ordinance. In 1999, the County received a grant
to design stream buffer signs. This grant provides funds to produce the signs previouSly designed.
The work to be performed by the County of Albemarle will be funded by a $3,150.00 State Grant and $4,390.00
local match. The local match will be transferred from the Engineering Department's approved budget and will not
require additional funds from the County.
APPROPRIATION #2001011
$1,478,070.00
Funding for HUD Public Assistance Housing Grants
The Section 8 Housing Program is an ongoing rental assistance program offered by the Federal Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Section 8-001 program provides housing assistance with 170
subsidies. Program 8-001 is funded through June 2002. The Section 8-002 program provides 80 housing
vouchers.
The final amount of the Federal HUD grant will be determined by the final amount of assistance rendered to
residents. Fund balance will be appropriated after the fiscal year end audit is completed. It is estimated that grant
8-001 will approximate $787,545.00 and grant 8-002 will approximate $690,525.00, a total of $1,478,070.00.
APPROPRIATION ~ry2001012
$564,442.00
Comprehensive Community Corrections Act Grant
The County of Albemarle serves a fiscal agent for the Jefferson Area Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB).
In that capacity, the County receives and appropriates funds awarded to the CCJB by the Department of Criminal
Justices Services (DCJS). The County contracts with community agencies to provide the services stipulated in the
grant.
For FY 2001/02, DCJS awarded $564,442.00 to the CCJB to be allocated as follows:
Offender Aid and Restoration for pre-trial and community correction services at the
Albemarle-Charlottesville Regional Jail and community correction se rvices
at the Central Virginia Regional Jail
$443,490.00
Central Virginia Regional Jail for pre-trial services
$ 33,066.00
Region Ten Community Services Board for substance abuse treatment
$ 85,886.00
Community Criminal Justice Board for office expenses
$ 2,000.00
Appropriation #2001013
$37,814.00
Funding for 2001 Local Law Enforcement Grant
The U.S. Department of Justice has awarded a two-year grant beginning October 1, 2000 to the County of Albemarle
for the reduction of crime and improvement of public safety. The Police Department plans on using these funds for
current officers working overtime in support of community safety projects within the County. The funds can also be
used to provide support in other areas, such as increased security, a crime prevention program, and a multi-
jurisdictional task force.
The $37,814.00 program will be funded by a $34,033.00 DOJ federal grant and local match of $3,781.00. The
local match will be funded out of current operations and does not require any additional monies.
Appropriation #2001014
$20,000.00
Funding for Metropolitan Planning Organization Grant
The 2001/2002 Unified Planning Work Program was prepared by the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
for the Charlottesville Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization. The program includes transportation studies
and ongoing planning activities, including a Transportation Improvement Program that lists road and transit
improvement for the upcoming three years, and the 20-year Charlottesville Area Transportation study updated every
five years. Other activities address traffic congestion reduction, city-county bicycle and pedestrian improvements,
and public-private transit development.
The workto be performed by the County of Albemarle will be funded by a $16,000.00 Federal Grant, a $2,000.00
State Grant, and a $2,000.00 transfer from the Planning Department's approved budget.
Appropriation #2001015
$137,151.00
Authorization to Expend Various School Grants and Donations
Henley Middle School received a donation in the amount of $2,500.00 from the Henley Middle School PTO.
These funds will be used for salaries for the At-Risk Program and library night.
The Virginia Commission for the Arts awarded an Artists-In-Education Residency Program Grant (AIERP) in the
amount of $1,350.00 to Stony Point Elementary School. This program will develop awareness of writing as a
medium for students and staff, integrating creative and nonfiction wdting into the core academic and arts curricula.
The Frederick S. Upton Foundation made a grant award in the amount of $6,000.00 to Henley Middle School. This
grant award will support Henley's Cultural Enrichment Program in funding three artists-in-residency programs:
Sculpture, Writer, and Dramatic Interpretation. The projects will involve interactive activities to include hands on
learning experiences for students with performing, visual and musical arts.
The Virginia Department of Education, Office of Virginia Business-Education Partnershi ps, made a grant award
to the Albemarle County Public School's Vocational Department in the amount of $103,468.00. These funds will
provide academic tutoring and mentoring to provide targeted students with adequate academic skills and career
planning. Career planning activities include field trips, job shadowing experience and an entre preneudal project.
Albemarle County Public School's Spedal Education Department received a Special Education Local Improvement
Grant (SLIVER) from the Virginia Department of Education in the amount of $15,627.00. SLIVER funds will allow
Special Education teachers to increase the level of achievement of students with disabilities on SOL content areas
assessments. These funds will be used to purchase computers and instructional technology.
Dominion Virginia Power awarded a grant in the amount of $3,500.00 to Broadus Wood Elementary School. This
grant will fund the project Kinesthetic Training for Students, Parents and Teachers. The target groups, which
include students, parents and teachers, will be trained with kinesthetic learning techniques. These action-based
activities help students strengthen learning and study skills in school and at home and will help prepare students
for their SOL tests.
The Virginia Department of Education awarded a Governor's Academic Challenge Grant in the amount of
$4,706.00 to Murray High School for FY00/01. The goal of this program is to enable participating at-risk math
students to pass the SOL tests. Computer assisted instruction; tutorial and teacher assistance will be available
during the math lab and after school.
Appropriation fY2001016 $370,841.41
Original Appropriation for FY02 Tourism Fund
Authorizes the transfer of Tourism Funds for nine projects approved in the original adopted General Fund budget:
Visitor's Bureau, Visitor's Bureau Maintenance, Tourism Development, Virginia Film Festival, Lewis & Clark Festival,
Festival of the Book, Discovery Museum, Municipal Band, Ashlawn-Highland.
This appropriation will also authorize the transfer of an additional $35,000 to implement the Greenway/Blueway
Program using Tourism Fund Balance revenues. (Explanation is provided under the description of new projects
under Appropriation #2001028.) Remaining tourism funds, in the amount of $380,841, are appropriated to a
contingency for future projects. The total contingency available for future projects is $560,081.
Appropriation #2001017
$1,000.00
Funding for Lewis & Clark Celebration
The Board of Supervisors previously approved this appropriation on September 12, 2001.
budget amendment to meet the statutory public hearing requirement.
It is included in this
Appropriation #2001018
$254,323.18
Reappropriation of FY 00101 Purchase Orders Outstanding as of June 30, 2001
Several departments had outstanding purchase orders for items contracted for in FY 01 that had not been received
as of June 30, 2001. This reappropriation will provide funding for these outstanding purchase orders to be paid in
FY 02.
Appropriation #2001019 $413,318.69
Reappropriation for C.A.D. System
The C.A.D. System is an Emergency Communication Center project funded by the County, City of Charlottesville,
and University of Virginia. This appropriation will reappropriate the funding for this uncompleted project.
Appropriation #2001020
$678,845.00
Reappropriation of FY 00/01 Uncompleted Projects as of June 30, 2001
Several departments had funding for projects originally approved in FY 01 that had not been completed as of June
30, 2001. This appropriation will reappropriate the funding for these uncompleted projects. The major uncompleted
projects are $125,000 for the Development Area Study and $250,000 for the Financial Management System. The
remaining smaller projects are distributed throughout various departments and include the county wide customer
service survey, election and redistricting expenses in the Registrar's Office, some vehicle repair and maintenance
and insurance deductibles and some carry-over consultant costs. These projects are itemized on the appropriation
form, which is located in the Clerk's Office for review.
Appropriation #2001021
$10,000.00
Computers for Bright Stars Program
This appropriation will provide funding for five elementary schools (Greer, Stone Robinson, Agnor-Hurt, Cale, and
Scottsville) to purchase and install computers for their Bright Stars Program. These purchases will be funded by
program revenues.
Appropriation #2001022 $529,870.00
Funding for FY01102 United Way Daycare Program
The County serves as fiscal agent for the United Way Program that provides scholarships for daycare assistance.
This program is jointly funded by the County, City of Charlottesville, and Commonwealth of Virginia. County funds
have already been allocated in the County's FY02 approved budget.
Appropriation #2001024
$101,962.00
Stone Robinson Elementary School received a donation in the amount of $250.00 from the Northwestern Mutual
Matching Gifts Program. This donation will be used to purchase educational materials for the school.
The Charlottesville-Albemarle Community Foundation Grant was not fully expended during FY00-01. It is
requested that the fund balance of $8,505.00 be re-appropriated for use in FY01-02.
State Farm Insurance Company awarded Agnor Hurt Elementary School a grant in the amount of $30,000.00. This
grant will fund the Mobile Classroom Project, The Do Drop In Bus. This bus is equipped as if it were a classroom.
The goal of the program is to improve the academic performance of students through extending the time available
to learn.
The Virginia Commission for the Arts awarded Woodbrook Elementary School a Touring Assistance Grant in the
amount of $150.00. This grant will help fund the Bob Brown Puppets performance.
At the November 30, 2000 meeting, the School Board received the Technology Literacy Challenge Grant Award
from the Virginia Department of Education in the amount of $53,300.00. This grant award also has a grant
balance of $45,590.00 that was not expended during FY00-01 and is being retained by the Virginia Department
of Education for disbursement in FY01-02. This grant award is designed to provide instruction to selected
teachers and other instructional personnel increasing their knowledge and skill to be effective in technology
instruction.
During the FY01-02 budget process, the School Board allocated $6,000.00 of funding to the Instructional
Technology Department to pay for hardware and other expenses associated with connecting School Board laptops
to Albemarle County School's network. Due to changing technology and selection of different hardware, not all
of these funds were necessary to provide this service. The remaining funds of $4,000.00 are to be returned to
the School Board Reserve.
Albemarle County Schools received funds from the Division of Teacher Education and Licensure, Department of
Education in the amount of $10,010.00. The 1998 session of the Virginia General Assembly appropriated funding
for a statewide clinical faculty and mentor teacher program to assist pre-service teachers and beginning teachers
in making a successful transition into full time teaching. These funds will be used to implement the mentor
teaching program for Albemarle County Schools.
The Shannon Foundation for Excellence in Public Education has awarded several teachers of Albemarle County
Schools with grants totaling $7,457.00. These grants will be used to purchase instructional materials to assist
students in various learning experiences.
Appropriation #200'1025 $5,657,777.82
Reappropriation of Uncompleted Projects in General Government CIP
Reappropriation of funds for ongoing capital improvement projects from FY 01. Many of these projects are multi-
year projects. These projects are itemized on the appropriation form.
Appropriation #2001026 $949,28t .17
Reappropriation of Uncompleted Projects in Storm Drainage
Reappropriation of funds for ongoing projects from FY 01. These projects are itemized on the appropriation form.
Appropriation #2001027 $1,162,480.62
Reappropriation of Uncompleted Projects in School CIP
Reappropriation of funds for ongoing projects from FY 01. These projects are itemized on the appropriation form.
Appropriation #2001028
$152,900.00
Funding for New Project Requests
The following new projects are recommended for funding from FY 01 carryover funds:
Department Amount Purpose of Funds
Commonwealth Attorney $14,000 Purchase of equipment and software to provide access
to the legal data base of the Virginia Commonwealth
Attorney Information System. Cost of equipment
exceeded projected funding.
Sheriff $18,200
Funding of part-time deputies to assist in becoming
State accredited.
Fire/Rescue $21,000
Funding to equip a training facility at East Rivanna to
provide system-wide training fo r volunteers; also to
purchase supplies needed for dealing with
hazardous materials.
Parks & Recreation
$35,000
Funding to move forward on implementing the County's
Greenway/Blueway Plan. This funding will provide for a
dedicated position (9 months in current year)within
Parks & Rec. to assist with the formation of a Greenway
Study Committee, execute existing proffers with
developers, identify areas for Greenway development,
pursue opportunities for improved river access and seek
out other revenue sources. This project will be funded
from the tourism fund using prior year fund balance
monies.
Zoning $ 3,700
Completion of renovations currently underway.
C.I.P - Fire/Rescue
$25,000
Fire Incident Reporting System that will interface with
the Computer Aided Dispatch System.
C.I:P. - Parks/Recreation
$36,000
Due to several occurrences, this funding is requested
to raise the height of the fence surrounding Lane Field
from 8 feet to 25 feet. This will significantly decrease the
number of vehicles struck by baseballs and the potential
for personal injuries.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
NUMBER 2001010
ADDITIONAL,
TRANSFER
NEW · ·
X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND:
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION TO EXPEND CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION GRANT.
CODE
I 1300 41030
1 1300 41030
EXPENDITURE
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*~d¢***~*~'~ ******************************************* ************************** -~.~.~-~.~,~.~****.~*~r~.~
110000 SALARIES $ 4,390.00
332300 SIGNS 3,150.00
CODE
2 1300 24000
2 1300 51000
TOTAL $ 7,540.00
REVENUE
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
240761 GRANT $ 3,150.00
512004 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER $ 4,390.00
TOTAL $ 7,540.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: ENGINEERING
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
AUGUST 27, 2001
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: " 01/02
TYPE OF APPROpRiATION:
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X?'-
YES -
NO X
2001'011
FUND:
HOUSING
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR HUD PUBLIC ASSISTANCE HOUSING GRANTS.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1227 81920 300205 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $80,912.00
1 1227 81920 312800AUDIT 400.00
I 1227 81920 579001 HOUSING ASSISTANCEPAYMENT 706,233.00
I 1227 81921 300205 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 65,696.00
I 1227 81921 312800 AUDIT 400.00
1 '227 81921 579001 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENT 582,398.00
1 '227 81921 930009 TRANSFER TO GEN'L FUND 42,031.00
TOTAL $1,478,070.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1227 33000 330015 SECTION 8-001 MOD. REHAB. ASST. $787,545.00
2 1227 33000 330016 SECTION 8-002 VOUCHER PROGRAM 690,525.00
TOTAL $1,478,070·00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: HOUSING
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
AUGUST 27, 2001
/~-, -//- o/
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
APPRO'-A iON:Pgl T "·
TYpE'oF
NUMBER 2001012
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND: GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ACT GRANT
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1520 29406 566120 OAR $ 443,490.00
1 1520 29406 566140 CENTRAL VA. JAIL 33,066.00
1 1520 29406 566150 REGION TEN 85,886.00
1 1520 29406 562500 TJ PLANNING DISTRICT 2,000.00
TOTAL $ 564,442.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1520 24000 240440 STATE GRANT $ 564 442.00
TOTAL $ 564,442.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: COUNTY EXECUTIVE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
AUGUST 27, 2001
/b-//- /
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02 NUMBER
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
NEW
YES
NO
X
2001013
FUND:
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR 2001 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1536 31013 120000 OVERTIME WAGES $ 35,127.00
1 1536 31013 210000 FICA 2,687.00
TOTAL $ 37,814.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1536 33000 300001 FEDERAL GRANT $ 34,033.00
2 1536 51000 512004 TRS. FROM GEN'L FUND 3,781.00
TOTAL $ 37,814.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: POLICE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
AUGUST 27, 2001
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
NUMBER 2001014
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
.YES
'NO
X
FUND:
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR METRPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1208 81301 110000 SALARIES-REGULAR $ 2,750.00
1 1208 81301 350000 PRINTING & BINDING 50.00
1 1208 81301 600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 200.00
1 1208 81302 110000 SALARIES-REGULAR 10,000.00
1 1208 81302 350000 PRINTING&BINDING 500.00
I 1208 81302 600100 OFFICE SUF~PLIES 1,500.00
1 1208 81309 110000 SALARIES-REGULAR 4,000.00
1 1208 81309 350000 PRINTING & BINDING 750.00
I 1208 81309 600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 250.00
TOTAL $ 20,000.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCR PTION AMOUNT
2 1208 24000 240500 GRANT REVENUE-STATE $ 2,000.00
2 1208 33000 330001 GRANT REVENUE-FEDERAL 16,000.00
2 1208 51000 512004 TRANSFER-GENERAL FUND 2,000.00
TOTAL $ 20,000.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: PLANNING
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
AUGUST 27, 2001
FISCAL ~'EAR: '
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
01/02
NUMBER
TYpE OF APPROPRIATION: ' A ITl UAL
. · . TRANSFER -
NEW X
ADVERTISE~MENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
2001015
FUND:
'VARIOUS
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION TO EXPEND VARIOUS SCHOOL GRANTS AND DONATIONS.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 2252 61101 160300 StaffDev $ 2,500.00
1 3104 60211 312500 ProfSvc Inst 1,350.00
1 3104 60252 312500 ProfSvc Inst 6,000.00
1 3209 61103 112100 Salaries-Teacher 50,000.00
1 3209 61103 210000 FICA 3,700.00
I 3209 61103 221000VRS 6,700.00
1 3209 61103 231000 Health Ins 3,000.00
1 3209 61103 232000Dentallns 500.00
1 3209 61103 241000 Life lns 563.32
I 3209 61103 420100 Field Tri ps 1,000.00
1 3209 61103 601300 Ed/RecSupplies 15,004.68
1 3209 61103 800100Mac/Equip-Add't 23,000.00
1 3211 61102 800100 Ma¢/Equip-Add't 15,627.00
I 3104 60201 312500 ProfSv¢ Inst 1,000.00
1 3104 60201 601300 Ed/Rec Supplies 2,500.00
1 3104 61101 132100 P/TWages 4,346.00
I 3104 61101 210000 FICA 360.00
CODE
TOTAL $ 137,151.00
REVENUE
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 2000 18100 181109 Donation $ 2,500.00
2 3104 24000 240355AIERP 1,350.00
2 3104 18000 ' 181221 Upton Grant 6,000.00
2 3209 24000 240299 VA Ed Partnership 103,468.00
2 3211 24000 240357 SLIVER Grant 15,627.00
2 3104 18000 181259 VA Power Grant 3,500.00
2 3104 51000 510100 GovAcademic Grant FROM FIB 4,706.00
TOTAL $ 137,151.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT 4, 2001
-//- /
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
NUMBER 2001016
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND: TOURISM
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ORIGINAL APPROPRIATION FOR FY02 TOURISM FUND.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
I 1810 72030 999999 TOURISM CONTINGENCY $ 380,841.41
TOTAL $ 380,841.41
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1810 51000 510100 TOURISM FUND BALANCE $ 380,841.41
TOTAL $ 380,841.41
TRANSFERS
1 1810 93010 930009 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND ORIGINALG/F BUDGET 409,411.00
1 1810 93010 930009 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND GREENWAY PLAN 35,000.00
2 1810 51000 510100 TOURISM FUNDBALANCE 444,411.00
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
AUGUST 30, 2001
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02 NUMBER
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION: ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
X
2001017
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND: GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR LEWIS & CLARK CELEBRATION.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
I 1000 79000 568735 LEWIS AND CLARK CELEBRATION $ 1,000.00
1 1000 95000 999990 B.O.S.-BUDGETADJUSTMENTS (1,000.00)
TOTAL $
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
TOTAL $
'TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: COUNTY EXECUTIVE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 7, 2001
/
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
NUMBER
ADDITIONALX
TRANSFER
NEW
2001018
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED?
YES
NO X
FUND: GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATION OFFY00~I PURCHASE ORDERS OUTSTANDING AS OFJUNE30,2001
CODE
I 1000 12010 800200
1 1000 12013 350000
1 1000 12013 800701
1 1000 12030 580040
I 1000 12141 310000
I 1000 12141 800200
1 1000 12142 600100
1 1000 12142 800200
1 1000 12142 800712
I 1000 12143 800200
1 1000 21020 800100
I 1000 21060 301210
I 1000 32011 800200
I 1000 32012 600400
1 1000 32012 601100
1 1000 32012 601100
1 1000 32012 601500
1 1000 32012 800200
I 1000 32013 601100
I 1000 32015 600400
1 1000 32015 600400
1 1000 32015 601100
1 1000 32015 601100
1 1000 32015 601100
1 1000 32015 601100
I 1000 41000 312341
I 1000 41000 312700
I 1000 41000 312700
I 1000 41000 331901
1 1000 41000 331901
1 1000 41000 331901
I 1000 41000 800200
1 1000 41000 950023
I 1000 42040 390001
I 1000 43002 301211
1 1000 43002 301211
1 1000 53011 800200
EXPENDITURE
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
HUMAN RESOURCES
FI NANCE-ADMINISTRATION
FINANCE-ADMINISTRATION
FIN-ASSESSMENT & COLLECTIONS
FIN-ASSESSMENT & COLLECTIONS
FIN-ASSESSMENT & COLLECTIONS
FIN-ACCOUNTING & PAYROLL
GENERAL DISTRICT COURT
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT
FIRE RESCUE-ADMI NISTRATION
FIRE RESCUE-TRAINING
FIRE RESCUE-TRAINING
FIRE RESCUE-TRAINING
FIRE RESCUE-TRAINING
FIRE RESCUE-TRAINING
FIRE PREVENTION
FIRE/RESCUE-OPERATIONS
FIRE/RESCUE-OPERATIONS
FIRE/RESCUE-OPERATIONS
FIRE/RESCUE-OPERATIONS
FI RE/RESCUE-OPERATIONS
FIRE/RESCUE-OPERATIONS
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
SOLID WASTE / RECYCLING
PUBLIC WORKS-MAINT DIV
PUBLIC WORKS-MAINT DIV
V.P.A. MANAGEMENT
$ 1,224.00
1,244.00
349.00
2,500.00
3,100.00
638.00
1,361.15
905.95
1,680.00
579.00
775.00
2,500.00
1,780.00
1,120.35
880.75
130.00
822.00
91'1.45
880.75
1,201.00
300.19
1,020 14
880.75
2,642.25
810.O0
47,564.35
995.50
27,78O.42
2,000.00
2,509.99
505.00
195.00
5,138.20
22,937 00
1,600.00
6.436.00
2,38300
1000 53014 600100 V.P.A. EMPLOYMENT SERVICE
1000 ~53014 601200 V.P.A. EMPLOYMENT SERVICE
1000 53014 800200 V.P.A. EMPLOYMENT SERVICE
1000 71013 '540000 P& R SUMMER SWIM PROGRAM
1000 71013 -540000 .P& R SUMMER SWIM PROGRAM
1000 71014 600700 'RECi-::~THLETICS & CLASSES
1 1000 71015 540000' P & R COMMUNITY CENTERS
1 1000 81010 301210 PLANNING
1 1000 81010 312342 PLANNING
1 1000 81010 312700 PLANNING
1 1000 81010 312700 PLANNING
1 1000 81010 800201 PLANNING
1 1000 81017 312385 E-911/PLANNING
I 1000 81017 550400 E-911/PLANNING
I 1000 81040 800100 ZONING SERVICES
1,338.94
620.77
278.00
180.00
45.00
547.20
630.00 ~
253.00
4,922.96:
5,400.00
3,111.83
169.99
85,138.00
396.80
1,010.50
TOTAL $ 254,323.18
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1000 51000 510100 G/FBALANCE $ 254,323.18
TOTAL $ 254,323.18
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE DATE
.,,,¢.,...¢_ lo, oo.,
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
X
2001019
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND: C.A.D.
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATION FOR C.A.D. SYSTEM.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 4105 31061 800306 C.A.D. $ 380,732.34
1 4105 31061 390003 ADMIN. FEE 32~586.35
TOTAL $ 413,318.69
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 4105 16000 160502CHARLOTTESVILLE $ 198,062.32
2 4108 16000 160503ALBEMARLE 178,925.66
2 4105 16000 160512UNIV. OFVA. 36,330.71
TOTAL $ 413,318.69
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 10, 2001
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW -' ·
YES
NO
-X
X
2001020
FUND: GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATION OF FY 00/01 UNCOMPLETED PROJECTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2001
1 1000 12030 312390
I 1000 12030 580030
1 1000 12030 580040
1 1000 12040 550570
1 1000 12143 800710
1 1000 13020 120000
1 1000 13020 210000
1 1000 13020 320000
1 1000 13020 360000
1 1000 13020 520100
1 1000 31013 601101
I 1000 31013 800301
I 1000 31013 800500
1 1000 31013 530010
1 1000 31020 605037
1 1000 32015 331500
1 1000 32015 331500
1 1000 32015 601015
1 1000 41000 312700
1 1000 41000 800100
I 1000 43002 331200
1 1000 43002 800100
1 1000 53011 312210
1 1000 53013 800501
1 1000 81010 312342
1 1000 81010 550400
I 1000 81010 800610
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION
HUMAN RESOURCES
COUNTY ATTORNEY
FINANCE
VOTER REGISTRATION
POLICE
SHERIFF
FIRE/RESCUE
ENGINEERING
PUBLIC WORKS
V.P.A.
V.P.A.
PLANNING
AMOUNT
QUIP TRAINING
CUSTOMER SERVICE
LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INIT
MOVING EXPENSE
D.P. SOFTWARE
O/T WAGES
FICA
TEMP. HELP
ADVERTISING
POSTAL SERVICES
UNIFORMS
COMMUNICATION EQUIP.
MOTOR VEHICLES
INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLES
R&M-VEHICLE
R&M-VEHICLE
R&M-VEHICLE
PORTABLE REHAB. UNIT
CONSULTANTS
MAC. & EQUIP.
R&M BUILDINGS
MAC. & EQUIP.
CONTRACT SERVICES
MOTOR VEHICLES
DEVEL. AREA STUDY
TRAVEL
RENOVATIONS
$ 24,430.00
27,380.00
21,333.00
3,360.00
250,000.00
900.00
70.00
1,500.00
1,000.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
5,000.00
20,500.00
15,000.00
417.00
10,000.00
20,500.00
9,340.00
25,000.00
800.00
15,000.00
14,000.00
25,000.00
19,000.00
125,000.00
5,000.00
2,815.00
1 2114 61311 580500 EDUCATION
TRAINING FUNDS
6,500.00
TOTAL $ 678.845.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1000 51000 510100 GENERAL FUND BALANCE $ . 672,345.00
2 1000 51000 510100 SCHOOL FUND BALANCE 6,500.00
TOTAL $ 678,845.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 18, 2001
i~-//- ¢' /
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
NUMBER 2001021
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND:
BRIGHT STARS
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
COMPUTERS FOR BRIGHT STARS PROGRAM.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1553 61122 800700 ADP EQUIP. $ 2,000.00
1 1553 61129 800700 ADP EQUIP. 2,000.00
I 1553 61151 800700 ADP EQUIP. 2,000.00
I 1553 61152 800700 ADP EQUIP. 2,000.00
I 1553 61153 800700 ADP EQUIP. 2,000.00
TOTAL $ 10,000.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1553 51000 510100 FUND BALANCE $ 10,000.00
TOTAL $ 10,000.00
TRANSFERS
******************************************* ************************** **¢¢~*$c*~**~******¢c**
REQUESTING COST CENTER: SOCIAL SERVICES
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 10, 2001
/
FISCAL YEAR:
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
X
2001022
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND:
UNITED WAY DAYCARE
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR FY 01102 UNITED WAY DAYCARE PROGRAM.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1550 53110 390056 ADMIN. FEE-UNITED WAY GRT $ 25,232.00
I 1550 53110 567910 UNITED WAY-DAY CARE GRANT 234,606.00
1 1550 53110 580025 COUNTY SHARE 83,635.00
1 1550 53110 580026 CITYSHARE 110,586.00
1 1550 53110 580027 UNITED WAY SHARE 75,811.00
TOTAL $ 529,870.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1550 33000 160510 ADMINFEES $ 25,232.00
2 1550 33000 330014 HHS UN. WAY. PASS THRU GT 234,606.00
2 1550 33501 160502 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE 110,586.00
2 1550 33501 160525 UNITED WAY MATCHING FUNDS 75,811.00
2 1550 51000 512004 TRS. FR.-GENERALFUND 83,635.00
TOTAL $ 529,870.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: SOCIAL SERVICES
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 18, 2001
/~, -//-' o/
' APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: ". 01/02
--ADVERTISEMENT'REQUIRED ?
FUND:
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
2001024
YES
NO X
SCHOOL/PROGRAMS
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING' FOR VARIOUS SCHOOL PROGRAMS.
CODE
EXPENDITURE
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****************************************** ***************************--**
1 2210 6110'1 601300 Ed/RecSupplies $ 250.00
I 3143 61101 540410 Rental-Instruments 8,505.00
1 3104 60215 132100 PfT-Wages 20,000.00
I 3104 60215 210000 FICA 1,530.00
1 3104 60215 601300 Ed/Re¢Supplies 8,470.00
1 3104 60212 312000 Prof Svc Inst 150.00
1 3131 61311 312500 ProfSvclnst 40,590.00
1 3131 61311 580000 Misc. Exp. 5,000.00
1 2115 62190 520300 Telecommunications (4,000.00)
1 2410 60100 999981 Sch. Bd. Reserve 4,000.00
1 2114 61311 580500 StaffDev 10,010.00
I 3502 60606 601300 Ed/RecSupplies 7,457.00
TOTAL $ 101,962.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 2000 18100 181109 Donation $ 250.00
2 3143 51000 510100 Comm. Found. GrantF/B 8,505.00
2 3104 18000 181247 State Farm Grant 30,000.00
2 3104 24000 240264Va. Comm. Touring Grant 150.00
2 3131 24000 240312 Technology Grant 45,590.00
2 2000 24000 240380 Mentor Teacher Pgm 10.010.00
2 3502 18000 181223 Shannon Found. 7,457.00
TOTAL $ 101 962.00
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
-D
DATE
SEPT. 18, 2001
FISCAL YEAR:
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
01/02 NUMBER
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND:
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATION OF UNCOMPLETED PROJECTS.
CODE
I 9010 12140 950004
1 9010 21000 312343
1 9010 21000 331000
1 9010 21020 800100
1 9010 21050 331000
1 9010 31000 800306
1 9010 31000 800915
1 9010 31010 800910
1 9010. 31040 800650
1 9010 32010 800523
1 9010 32010 950092
1 9010 32010 950110
1 9010 41000 312700
I 9010 41000 800690
1 9010 41000 800960
I 9010 41000 950035
I 9010 41000 950039
1 9010 41000 950059
I 9010 41000 950061
1 9010 41000 950090
I 9010 41000 950091
I 9010 41000 950116
1 9010 41020 950024
1 9010 41020 950051
1 9010 41020 950068
I 9010 41020 950081
I 9010 41020 950115
1 9010 43100 800664
1 9010 43100 800666
1 9010 43100 800687
I 9010 43100 950042
1 9010 43100 950102
I 9010 43100 950117
1 9010 43100 950119
1 9010 43100 950120
1 9010 43100 950123
1 9010 43100 950125
I 9010 43100 950127
1 9010 43100 950128
1 9010 71000 800665
EXPENDITURE
DESCRIPTION
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
COURT FACILITIES
COURT FACILITIES
GENERAL DISTRICT COURT
JUVENILE COURT
PUBLIC SAFETY
PUBLIC SAFETY
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ECC-OPERATIONS
FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. PROJ.
PARKS & RECREATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
YES
NO X
GENERAL FUND C.I.P
2001025
AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
SPACE NEEDS STUDY
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY
FIRING RANGE
BUILDINGS-CONSTRUCTION
FIRE PUMPER-REPLACEMENT
FIRE HOUSE/AERIAL FIRE APP
RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYS.
PROF. SER. CONSULTANTS
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PRO
STREET LIGHTS
NORTH BERKSHIRE ROAD
MEADOWCREEK PARKWAY ENG
KEENE LANDFILL CLOSURE
MEADOWCREEK PATH
IVY ROAD
BARRACKS RD SIDEWALK
MEADOW CREEK PKWAY PHS 1
LANDSCAPI NG-29 NORTH
AVON ST RT 20 CONNECTOR
WAKEFIELD ROAD IMP.
REVENUE SHARING ROADS
AIRPORT ROAD SIDEWALKS
SECURITY SYSTEMS
FACILITY MAINT.
COB - CHILLER REPLACEMENT
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TAN
C.O.D.-PARKING LOT
SOCIAL SERV. RENOVATION
BOARD RM. RENOVATIONS
FINANCE RENOVATIONS
HUMAN RESOURCE RENOVATIO
EDUCATION RENOVATIONS
DEVELOPMENT DEPT. RENOVAT
COB ENTRY CORRIDOR BEAUTY
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGES
45,975.57
117,201.13
1,230.45
5,000.00
27,554.19
178,925.66
14,795.57
30.000.00
3 677.03
453,200.00
433,631.34
18,503.64
50,000.00
95,420.50
76,929.21
3,079.00
24,275.41
271 872.80
20 000.00
51 667.00
46 933.25
22 613.22
74 251.75
5 242.50
22 465.00
456 776.90
127 000.00
34 254.41
92 569.90
8 693.75
1 092.85
7 697.61
2 194.10
69 050.00
5,360.34
18,495.00
3,670.00
50,000.00
85,000.00
34 800.47
9010 '71000 800668 PARKS & RECREATION ADACHANGES-SCHOOLS 4,074.00
9010 71000 800949 PARKS & RECREATION MAINTENANCE PROJECTS. . ~ 19,709.49
9010 71000 950003 PARKS&RECREATION CROZET PARK IMPROVEMENTS 11,886.91
9010 71000 950009 PARKS & RECREATION SCOTTSVCOMMUNITY CENTER 70,537.71
9010 7:1000 950028 PARKS & RECREATION RED HILL RECREATION IMP-' 400.57
9010 71000 950033 PARKS & RECREATION WALNUT CREEK REC PROJECTS 920.50
9010 71000 950034' PARKS & RECREATION TOWE PARK REC PROJECTS 147,304.75
9010 71000 950044 PARKS&RECREATION ATH.'FIELDSTUDY/DEVEL? 2,628.48
9010 71000 950050 PARKS & RECREATION SOUTHERN PARK DEVELOPMEN 52,055.06
9010 71000 950064 PARKS & RECREATION IVY LANDFILL DEV'L 20,000.00
9010 71000 950070 PARKS&RECREATION BROWNSVILLE REC. IMP. 1,492.77
9010 71000 950121 PARKS & RECREATION SIMPSON PARK 513,633.50
9010 72030 580416 TOURISM CONSERV. EASEMENT-TOURISM 350,000.00
9010 73020 800700 LIBRARIES ADP EQUIPMENT 95,000.00
9010 73020 800949 LIBRARIES MAINTENANCE PROJECTS 104,576.65
9010 73020 950076 LIBRARIES NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY 4,223.10
9010 73020 950114 LIBRARIES NEW LIBRARY 500.00
9010 73020 999999 LIBRARIES CONTINGENCY FUNDS 58,883.00
9010 81010 580409 PLANNING ACQUIS.-CONSERV. EASEMENT 650,000.00
9010 81010 950053 PLANNING NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 58,851.78
9010 81010 950108 PLANNING GREENBRIARPED./BIKEPATH 75,000.00
9010 81010 950139 PLANNING PARCEL CONVERSIONPROJECT 325,000.00
TOTAL $ 5,657,777.82
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 9010 16000 160502 CHARGES FOR SERVICES CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE $ 12,927.50
2 9010 18000 189916 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE CHAMBER OF COM./29 NORTH 6,775.90
2 9010 18100 181113 DONATIONS AND GIFTS DONATION-SIMPSON PARK 293 633.50
2 9010 24000 240231 CATEGORICAL AID-STATE VA.DEPT.OFTRANSPORTATION 54 150.33
2 9010 51000 510100 TRANSFERS FUND BALANCE 4,436,364.93
2 9010 51000 512023 TRANSFERS TRS. FR.-E911 178925.66
2 9010 51000 512034 TRANSFERS TRS. FROM TOURISM 350.000.00
2 9010 51000 512004 TRANSFERS TRS. FROM GIF 325,000.00
I 4101 93O1O
2 4101 51000
I 1000 93O1O
2 1000 51000
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
TRANSFERS
930010 TRANSFER TO C.t.P
510100 E-911 SURCHARGE FUND
930010 TRANSFER TO C.I.P
510100 G/F BALANCE
TOTAL $5,657,777.82
178,925.66
FUND BALANCE 178,925.66
325,000.00
325,000.00
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 20, 2001
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND:
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATION OF UNCOMPLETED PROJECTS.
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
YES
NO X
STORM DRAINAGE
2001026
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
9100 41000 800975 ENGINEERING STORM WATER CONTROL IM $ 153,219.26
9100 41000 950093 ENGINEERING DRAINAGE STUDY/PLAN 183,219.72
9100 41036 312400 BIRNAM/VVYNRtDGE BASIN PROF. SER. ENGINEERING 8,391.45
9100 41036 800750 BIRNAM/WYNRIDGE BASIN PURCHASE OF LAND 341,650.00
9100 41036 800975 BIRNAM/WYNRIDGE BASIN STORM WATER CONTROL IM 51,147.28
9100 41037 800975 IVY ROAD DRAINAGE STORM WATER CONTROL IM 80,000.00
9100 41049 800975 WOODBROOKCHANNEL STORM WATER CONTROL IM 26,505.00
9100 41054 800975 RICKY ROAD STORM WATER CONTROL IM 36,000.00
9100- 41057 800975 WESTMORELAND CRT STORM WATER CONTROL IM 69,148.46
TOTAL $ 949,281.17
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 9100 51000 510100 TRANSFERS APPROPRIATION-FUNDBAL $ 949,281.17
TOTAL $ 949,281.17
TRANSFE RS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 20 2001
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
X
2001027
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED?
YES
NO X
FUND:
SCHOOL C,I.P.
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATION OF UNCOMPLETED PROJECTS.
CODE
1 9000 60100 800665
1 9000 60203 800605
1 9000 60204 800673
1 9000 60210 800901
I 9000 60211 800987
1 9000 60214 800605
1 9000 60217 312350
1 9000 60217 800630
1 9000 60218 312350
1 9000 60251 800901
1 9000. 60254 800901
1 9000 60255 800200
I 9000 60301 800605
1 9000 60303 800901
1 9000 60304 312350
I 9000 60304 800120
I 9000 60304 800605
1 9000 60410 800665
1 9000 60510 800901
1 9000 61101 800700
I 9000 62190 800700
I 9000 62420 312310
I 9000 62420 800949
EXPENDITURE
DESCRIPTION
SCHOOL BOARD
CROZET ELEM
GREER ELEM
STONE ROBINSON ELEM
STONY POINT ELEM
CALE ELEM SCHOOL
BAKER-BUTLER ELEMENTARY
BAKER-BUTLER ELEMENTARY
SOUTHERN ELEMENTARY
BURLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL
WALTON MIDDLE SCHOOL
SUTHERLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL
ALBEMARLE HIGH SCHOOL
MURRAY EDUCATION CENTER
MONTICELLO HIGH SCHOOL
MONTICELLO HIGH SCHOOL
MONTICELLO HIGH SCHOOL
C.A.T.E.C
VEHICLE MAINTENACE FACILI
CLASS/INSTRUC-REGULAR
ADM.-TECHNOLOGICAL SERVIC
FACILITY MAINT-BLDG SERVC
FACILITY MAINT-BLDG SERVC
AMOUNT
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE $
CONSTRUCTION
HVAC IMPROVEMENTS
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
PARKI N G/PLAYGRO U N D
CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
SITE PREPARATION
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
CONSTRUCTION
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
EQ U IPMENT/MATERIALS
CONSTRUCTION
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ADP EQUIPMENT
ADP EQUIPMENT
A & E ROOF REPLACEMENT
MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
197,266.67
13,002.34
19,317.27
10,997.77
18,996.69
1,613.90
129,245.27
130,727.93
20,000.00
120,272.60
30,393.07
1 249.33
4 193.98
8 683.50
5 000.00
10 000.00
23 770.90
8 772.34
8 274.81
214 865.25
10 890.89
40 055.80
134 890.31
TOTAL $ 1,162,480.62
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 9000 51000 510100 TRANSFERS APPROPRIATION-FUNDBAL $ 1,162,480.62
TOTAL $ 1,162,480.62
TRANSFERS
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
DATE
SEPT. 20, 2001
' AI~PROF~I~IATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR: 01/02 NUMBER
TYPE OF APpROpRIATION: ADDITIONAL
' TRANSFER
NEW
2001028
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND: GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR NEW PROJECT REQUEST.
EXPENDITURE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 1000 22010 800700 COMMWEALTHATTORNEY VCAIS-ADPEQUIP $ 14,000.00
1 1000 31020 130000 SHERIFF P/TWAGES 16,900.00
1 1000 31020 210000 FICA 1,300.00
1 1000 32012 800100 FIRE/RESCUE MACH. & EQUIP. 3,000.00
I 1000 32012 800700 ADP EQUIPMENT 12,000.00
I 1000 32015 580404 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SUP 6,000.00
1 1000 71011 110000 PARKS AND RECREATION WAGES 25,765.00
1 1000 71011 210000 FICA 1,970.00
1 1000 7101'1 221000 RETIREMENT 2,150.00
1 1000 71011 231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 2,280.00
1 1000 71011 232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 85.00
1 1000 7101'1 241000 LIFE INSURANCE 205.00
1 1000 71011 270000 WORKER COMPENSATION 38.00
1 1000 71011 600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,507.00
1 1000 81040 800500 ZONING RENOVATIONS 3,700.00
I 9010 32010 950140 FIRE/RESCUE FIRE INCIDENTREPORTING 25,000.00
I 9010 71000 950097 PARKS LANE BASEBALLFIELD 36,000.00
TOTAL $ 152,900.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2 1000 51000 510100 GENERAL FUND BALANCE $ 56,900.00
2 1000 51000 512034 TRANSFER FROM TOURISM 35,000.00
2 9010 51000 512004 TRANSFER FROM G/F 61,000.00
TOTAL $ 152,900.00
TRANSFERS
1 1000 93010 930010 TRANSFER TO C.I.P. 61,000.00
2 1000 51000 510100 GENERAL FUNDBALANCE 61,000.00
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE
--__
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUM MARY
AGENDA TITLE:
SP 01-17 Merrie Meadows
SU BJECT/PROPOSAI-/REQUEST:
Board of Supervisors deferred consideration of a special use
permit for a Church until October 10, 2001, in order to review
information provided by the applicant.
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Tucker, Foley, Cilimberg, McDowell
AGENDA DATE:
October 10, 2001
ACTION: X
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
ITEM NUMBER:
INFORMATION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
/
BACKGROUND:
On September 19, 2001, the Board deferred SP 01-17 until October 10, 2001, in order for staff to review additional information
provided by the applicant regarding the church relationship with the camp and its meetings.
As previously discussed, SP 1985-035, a special use permit allowing four cabins for weekend lodging/camping two times a year
was approved with a condition that restricted the camp use to the owner rather than the property. When the owner transferred
the property into a family trust, the special use permit became invalid.
DISCUSSION:
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 restricts governments from imposing or implementing land use
regulations" in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person, including a religious assembly or
institution" unless there is a compelling governmental interest and the regulation is the least restrictive means for furthering that
interest.
Based u pon the applicant's statements at the Board's September 9, 2001, public hearing and written materials thereafter submitted,
staff has determined that the camping events associated with the congregation are accessory to the primary church use. Cumulative
impacts resulting from both the church and potential accessory uses require further review by zoning, engineering, and the Health
Department. These mpacts include noiSe, lights, traffic, and water, septic and waste management issues.
It should be noted that the new information regarding the camp events as accessory to the church was not available at the time of
the Planning Commission hearing. In addition, any new conditions of approval resulting from this information will not have been
reviewed by the Commission. The Commission believed that the camping events would require a separate special use permit;
therefore, the Commission's recommendation for approval did not consider camping events as an accessory use. Therefore, the
Board of Supervisors may choose to refer this application back to the Planning Commiss ion for reconsideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
In order to allow staff adequate time to review impacts associated with the camping events, staff recommends the Board of
Supervisors defers action on this request and, if the Board deems warranted, refer this application back to the Planning Commission
for their reconsideration and recommendation.
01.192
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department o£ Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
~804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804~ 972 - 4012
October 1, 2001
David M. Rutt
2860 Cindy Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22911
RE: SP~2001-017 Merrie Meadows; Tax Map 48, Parcel 15A
Dear Mr. Rutt:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on September 19, 2001 accepted
without prejudice, your request for deferral. This item has been rescheduled for review on
Wednesday, October 10, 200~1. You may contact the C erk to the Board of SupervisorS, at 296-
5841 to determine the time for review.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, -
~irector of Planning Co~t.~.~ty Development
vwc/jcf
10-0t-01 P04:48 IN
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUM MARY
AGENDA TITLE: Crozet Laundromat SP 01-23
SU BJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant
requests a Special Use Permit to allow for a coin
operated laundromat in accordance with Section
[27.2.2.14] of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for
supporting commercial uses. The property, described as
Tax Map 56A3 Parcel 9A, contains approximately 0.71
acres, and is located in the White Hall Magisterial
District on Three Notch'd Road [Route #240] across
from the old Con Agra facility. The property is zoned LI
(Light Industrial). The Comprehensive Plan designates
this property as Rural Area 3.
STAFF CONTACT(S): Mr. Barnes; Mr. Cilimberg
AGENDA DATE:
October 10, 2001
ACTION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ITEM NUMBERS:
INFORMATION:
ACTION: No INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
· Revised S ketch Plan dated 10/4/01
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
At its October 2, 2001 Public Hearing, the Planning Commission considered the following staff-
recommended conditions:
1. The owner shall provide for the parking and directional signage in general accord with the
improvements shown on the sketch plan, prepared by Raymond E. Gaines, Architect titled
"Crozet Laundry" and last revised 9/19/01 prior to opening the laundromat use granted
under this Special Use Permit. The individual parking spaces shall be permanently
delineated on the site.
2. The owner shall close the eastern most access point on Tax Map 56A3 Parcel 9A in a manner
that meets with the approval of the Albemarle County Department of Engineering and Public
Works. The requirements of this condition shall be preformedprior to opening the
laundromat use granted under this Special Use Permit.
3. The applicant shall provide a traffic island or bollards to protect the parking space
designated number "1" on the sketch plan.
DISCUSSION:
Upon review of the plan and the conditions, the Planning Commission recommended that the
applicant alter the two-way circulation pattern on the western side of the site. The Commission
asked the applicant to remove the two-way circulation and make the entire site a one-way
circulation running counter-clockwise around the building. They also asked the applicant to
convert the perpendicular spaces, labeled "1-5" on the Sketch plan, into four angled spaces.
The applicant has agreed to this revision and has submitted a revised sketch plan illustrating
the Commission's recommended changes (Attachment A).
The third, staff-recommended condition to the Commission asked the applicant to add a traffic
island or bollard to protect the parking space labeled "1". The applicant has provided for the
bollard on the latest version of the sketch plan.
In the Planning Commission Action Letter, the recommendations of the Commission were..
conveyed descriptively in writing to the Board. Since the applicant has supplied a plan rews~on
detailing the Commission's recommended changes, staff is now providing the Board with two
revised conditions which will clarify the matter and simplify the implementation of the Special
Use Permit Conditions.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit with the following conditions:
1. The owner shall provide for the parking and directional signage in general accord with the
improvements shown on the sketch plan, prepared by Raymond E. Gaines, Architect titled
"Crozet Laundry" and last revised 10/4/01 prior to opening the laundromat use granted under
this Special Use Permit. The individual parking spaces shall be permanently delineated on
the site.
2. The owner shall close the eastern most access point on Tax Map 56A3 Parcel 9A in a manner
that meets with the approval of the Albemarle County Department of Engineering and Public
Works. The requirements of this condition shall be preformed prior to opening the
laundromat use granted under this Special Use Permit.
1011-' I/2 5TOP-.','
FRAME
34.2'
AS?HALT I~
PARKING LOT T
TM 56A(5)
PARCEL 9A
21.0'
2 5TORY
CINDEP.. BLOCK,
82.1'
ASPHALT \
PARKING LOT
TM 5 GA(,.3)
PARCEL
O.&~ Mr, +- TO
RT. 610
240
PARKING PLAN
DCALE: "~ 20'
(THREE NOTCH'D ROAD)
PARCEL 9A
TAX MAP 5(gA(3)
PAP-JqNG PLAN DAE, ED ON DURVEY BY D. AUBR.EY
HUFFMAN DATED AUGUST 29, 2001 .
5PECIA, USE PEP, MIT 5P 01-023 HA5 BEEN APPLIED FOR,.
ALL PARK. lNG POR PARCEL DC ID ON E×IDTING PAVEMENT.
PAP-,¢,I NG 5UMMAR. Y
~?ACE5 P-ZQ'D PER. COUNTY LETTER DATED 8'-2~-01: 25
5PACED PROVIDED; 25
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 Mclntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4012
October 3, 2001
Pastor Jonathan Quesenberry
5668 Wayland Ddve
Crozet, VA 22932
RE: SP-2001-023 Crozet Laundromat; Tax Map 56A3, Parcel 9B
Dear Pastor Q uesenberry:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on October 2, 2001,unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note
that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The owner shall provide for the parking and directional signage in general accord with the
improvements shown on the sketch plan, prepared by Raymond E. Gaines, Architect titled
"Crozet Laundry" and last revised 9/19/01 prior to opening the laundromat use granted
under this Special Use Permit. Finally, the individual parking spaces shall be permanently
delineated on the site.
2. The owner shall close the eastern most access point on Tax Map 56A3 Parcel 9A in a
manner that meets with the approval of the Albemarle County Department of Engineering
and Public Works. The requirements of this condition shall be preformed prior to opening
the laundromat use granted under this Special Use Permit.
3. The applicant shall provide a traffic island or bollards to protect the parking space
designated number "1" on the sketch plan.
The Commission also approved a site plan waiver request in accordance with Section 32.2.2 of
the Zoning Ordinance, subject to the following:
The owner shall remove the two-way circulation from the western'side of the parcel and
replace it with a one-way circulation that proceeds counter-clockwise around the building.
Additionally, the owner shall replace the perpendicular parking spaces, labeled "1-5" on the
plan, with four angled parking spaces.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on October 10, 2001. Any new or additional
information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the BOard of
Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
if you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Michael Barnes
Planner
MB/jcf
Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley
Jack Kelsey Steve AIIshouse
Bob Ball
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
MICHAEL BARNES
OCTOBER 2, 2001
OCTOBER 10, 2001
SP 01-023 CROZET LAUNDROMAT
SITE PLAN WAIVER REQUEST
ANGLED PARKING AUTHORIZATION
PARELLEL PARKING AUTHORIZATION
ONE-WAY CIRCULATION AUTHORIZATION
Applicant's Proposal:
The applicant, John Quesenberry, has proposed a coin operated laundromat with drop-off
service to be located in the old Con Agra Seconds Store. The location is in an existing
building that is part of a series of commercial building along Three Notch'd Road across
from the Con Agra Plant.
Petition:
The applicant_requests a Special Use Permit to allow for a coin operated laundromat in
accordance with Section [27.2.2.14] of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for supporting
commercial uses. The property, described as Tax Map 56A3 Parcel 9A, contains
approximately 0.71 acres, and is located in the White Hall Magisterial District on Three
Notch'd Road [Route #240] across from the old Con Agra facility. The property is zoned LI
(Light Industrial). The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Rural Area 3.
Applicant's Justification for the Request:
The applicant has identified the need for a Laundromat and drop-off service in the Crozet
area. Currently, the only laundromats available to western Albemarle residents are either in
Waynesboro or Charlottesville. The applicant has chosen the proposed location within
Crozet because of a lack of available commercial space within Crozet. The site also has a
natural gas hook-up that is integral to the applicant's business.
Character of the Area:
The proposed location is on Route 240 (Three Notch'd Road) (See Attachment A). To the
east of the property is a small lot that is vacant and covered with grass on TMP 56A3-11.
The former Con Agra Plant is located across Route 240 (TMP 56A3-8). The annex for the
Con Agra plant (TMP 56A3-7) is to the west of the subject property. The Con Agra
employee parking lot is behind the subject property.
The building proposed for the laUndromat is on one of four properties owned Jeff Sprouse. If
approved, the laundromat will share space within the same building as a video store. The
video store is located on TMP 56A3-9A. To the west, Theresa's Restaurant is located in an
old house on TMP 56A3-9B. Between and behind the restaurant and the video store is a
single family home on TMP 56A3-9. Finally, there is a vacant lot directly behind the video
store, TMP 56A3-9C, which is paved and is also owned by Mr. Sprouse.
All of the above mention properties surrounding the laundromat are zoned either LI, Light
Industrial, or HI, Heavy Industrial.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit with conditions.
Planning and Zoning History:
The four properties owned by Mr. Sprouse (9, 9A, 9B, and 9C) share a common history and
remained closely tied to each other. All four properties received a rezoning from R-2 to B-I
in 1968 (ZMA-027). This rezoning allowed the establishment of a Texaco Service station.
In 1980, as a part of the comprehensive Countywide rezoning, these properties were rezoned
from B-1 (Commercial) to LI (Light Industrial).
From 1980 to 1992, the house on the adjacent property (Parcel 9B) received a series of
zoning clearances to allow for a wide range of business from restaurants to auto sales to tax
services. These businesses did not require a Special Use Permit. In 1998, the Board
approved a Special Use Permit for Theresa's Restaurant (SP 98-048) which allowed the
restaurant as a supporting commercial use in an industrial district.
The parcel under consideration for this Special Use Permit (Parcel 9A) also has a long
history. Currently, there is one building on this parcel with three individual spaces. The first
floor of the building was originally the "damaged goods" outlet store for the Con Agra Plant.
This store closed in 1998. Currently half of this space is occupied by a video store. (The
video store was in the house on Parcel 9B, but moved to its current location when SP 98-048
was granted.) The other half of the Con Agra Store became the La Boricua Mexican Grocery
Store in 2000. This use was granted without a Special Use Permit because the Mexican
Grocery applied for a Zoning Clearance within two years of the Con Agra Store vacating the
premises. Now that the Mexican Grocery has left, the applicant has applied for a Special Use
Permit for the laundromat. The final space within this building is on the second floor. It is
an office space and is current vacant.
Comprehensive Plan:
The Comprehensive Plan shows this property within the Rural Area. It was designated as a
Rural Area to discourage development within the Beaver Creek water supply reservoir
watershed. (Beaver Creek Reservoir is the water supply of Crozet.) The change in land use
designation to Rural Area was accompanied by the County's comprehensive rezoning. This
comprehensive rezoning change the parcel's zoning from B-1 to LI in order to allow for
continued use of the existing development in accord with the adjoining uses.
The Crozet Community Study, which is also a part of the Comprehensive Plan, recommends
that all new commercial activities be locatedin the downtown area of Crozet. The Crozet
Community Study included this area as part of Crozet's "Downtown". Within the
Community Study, relevant recommendations for the downtown area are:
· Strengthen the downtown as a shopping area and the focal point of the Crozet
Community by encouraging all new commercial uses to locate in the downtown
as opposed to Route 250
· Encourage residential uses to locate in and near downtown to increase pedestrian
activity and make the area more vibrant
· Establish a human scaled environment which is compatible and visually
integrated with the existing downtown and surrounding residential areas
· Encourage new commercial development through redevelopment, reuse, and
infill. New commercial development should occur in a style and scale in keeping
With traditional buildings.
· Have parking provided at the side and rear of buildings
· Have mixed uses including commercial and residential uses in the same buildings
· Provide a pedestrian environment
Staff believes that the proposed development is in keeping with the Crozet Community Study
because it is close enough to the downtown to be considered a part of it. The proposal also
meets several of the Crozet Community Study's goal it is a redevelopment of an existing
structure and will provide a majority of the parking on the Side or behind the building.
The Neighborhood Model
Staff has also analyzed this proposal for conformity with Land Use Standards for Designated
Development Areas (General Land Use Standards pp. 20 - 22) of the Comprehensive Plan
and with the 12 principles of the Neighborhood Model. These principles are identified below
and highlighted within this section for context within the Land Use Plan. The 12 principles
of the Neighborhood Model are as follows:
· Pedestrian Orientation
· Neighborhood Friendly Streets and Paths
· Interconnected Streets and Transportation Networks
· Parks and Open Space
· Neighborhood Centers
· Buildings and Spaces of Hnman Scale
· Relegated Parking
· Mixture of Uses
· Mixture of Housing Types and Affordability
· Redevelopment
· Site Planning that Respects Terrain
· Clear Edges
1. Development should be concentrated and clustered to protect environmental features.
(Parks and Open Space; Site Planning that Respects Terrain).
The proposal calls for a redevelopment of an existing structure. No expansion of the
existing impervious cover or removal of vegetation is proposed. Therefore, there should
be no additional impacts to any environmental features.
2. Maintain existing forested areas acting as buffers between subdivisions.
The site is surrounded by LI zoned land and parking lots. Staff does not believe
buffering is needed.
3. Limit access points to minimize the impact of development on major roads.
Of the four properties that Mr. Sprouse owns, two of them front on to Route 240 -
Parcels 9A and 9B. These two parcels have four entrances on to Route 240.between
them. Both VDOT and the Engineering Department have expressed a desire to eliminate
several of these entrances for safety reasons. The owner has a~eed to close the
easternmost entrance at this time (see Attachment A). Staff suggests a condition of
approval to ensure that the entrance is closed.
At some point in the near future, the owner plans to submit a site plan for an additional
building on Parcel 9. He also plans to consolidate the four parcels into a single parcel.
At that time, he has agreed to eliminate additional entrances. Staff agrees with delaying
the other entrance closures until the site plan is submitted so that the entire site is review
as a unified development.
4. A sense of community should be maximized by providing connections between
developments; such connections may provide for additional recreational facilities,
increased open space area, bicycle/pedestrian links, improved public transit, emergency
access, and access to schools, parks, and other public facilities. (Pedestrian Access and
Interconnected Streets and Transportation Networks)
The site currently possesses a sidewalk along Route 240. There is no development
directly behind the four properties owned by Mr. Sprouse and therefore staff believes that
there is ne reason to provide for pedestrian or vehicular access to the properties behind
the development, When and if the landowner decides to re-develop the area behind the
video store, pedestrian access may be warranted.
5. Provide for ultimate future transportation improvements and new road locations through
the reservation of adequate right-of-way and by designing and constructing utilities in a
manner consistent with planned transportation improvements, including auto, bus,
bicycle, and pedestrian modes (Pedestrian Access and Interconnected Streets and
Transportation Networks).
As mentioned above, limiting access to the site by closing one or more of the ingress/
egress points will improve the road conditions along Route 240. At present, the parking
lots for Parcels 9A and 9B are a single parking lot.
6. Underground utilities should be provided in new developments.
At this time, the owner is not proposing any new structures on the property nor does he
plan to put any of the utilities underground at this time.
7. Features to prevent impact from impervious surfaces on water quality should be
provided.
At this time, the owner is not proposing any new structures on the property and therefore
does not have to upgrade the site to comply with the stormwater quantity and quality
regulations of the Water Protection Ordinance. If the owner increases the amount of
impervious cover (e.g., through either a new building or increasing the parking lot), the
Water Protection Ordinance regulations may apply.
8. Building orientation should be to public streets; parking areas do not need to be located
exclusively in front of buildings. (Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale; Relegated
Parking)
The current building faces toward the public street. Most of the parking will be either to
the side or behind the building.
4
9. Where site illumination is proposed, down-directed and shielded lights should be used.
Any new lighting for the development will have to meet the requirements of the Outdoor
Lighting Ordinance (4.17).
10. Historic buildings should be adaptively reused. (Redevelopment)
There are no buildings of historical importance on this site. However, this is a reuse of a
building with a history of commercial uses.
11. The phasing of developments should match service and infrastructure availability and
capacity.
Natural gas, water and sewer service is available to serve this development.
12. Overall development density should be as high a level as is practical.
At present, the request is for the reuse of an existing building with no residential uses.
13. The integrity of adjacent residential areas should be maintained through use of buffering,
screening, and separation of adjacent non-residential uses.
There are no adjacent residential areas.
14. Developments should be designed with an internal orientation to foster a sense of place
and avoid the image of continuous suburban sprawl. (Buildings and spaces of Human
Scale).
By closing at least on entrance on Route 240, the project will improve the internal
orientation of the site. When and if TM-P 56A3-9 and 9C are re-developed, the applicant
will be required to get site plan approval. At this time, .the County will have the chance
to further improve the site. The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board will also
have a chance to comment on the site. At that time, the owner may have to comply with
the Entrance Corridor requirements.
15. Provisions should be made for innovative design that reduces housing costs.
(Affordability with Dignity)
The project offers no residential component.
16. Lot design and residential layout should be based on a rational use of land that reflects
topographic and other physical features rather than massive grading to eliminate or
counteract those features. (Site Planning that Respects Terrain)
There is no grading proposed in relation to the special use permit.
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance below:
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits
permitted hereunder. Special use permits_for uses as provided in this ordinance may be
issued upon a finding by the Board o_f Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial
detriment to adjacent property,
If approved, the use is not anticipated to be detrimental to adjacent property. No adverse
traffic or noise is expected with the use. The use is considered to be complimentary of and
supportive to the nearby and adjacent residential uses.
A petition of support was provided from the Crozet Community that indicates the nearby
community is in favor of the proposed use and does not view it as detrimental (See
Attachment B). Staffhas not compared the names with those of nearby and adjoining
property owners; however, no concerns of nearby residents have been raised with staff.
that the character q£the district will not be chan~ed thereby,
It is unlikely that character o f the industrial zoning district will be changed by the proposed
use.
and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent qf this ordinance,
This request is in keeping with the intent Crozet Study's concepts for a "downtown" type
development. It is not in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan's designation of Rural Areas.
However, the site has been used as a commercial site for years and there will be no increase
to the imperious cover, so no addition traffic, noise or environmental impacts are envisioned.
with the uses permitted by right in the district,
Permitted uses are related to light industrial activities. It is hard to envision a laundromat
negatively affecting any industrial activities.
with additional rezulations provided in Section 5. 0 o_f this ordinance,
There are no additional regulations in the Supplementary Regulations section of the
Ordinance governing a laundromat.
and with the public health, safety and general welfare.
Staff developed a list of recommended conditions of approval with the applicant, which are
included in the recommendation below. Staff believes that, with the conditions
recommended, the general welfare of the community will be increased b y decreasing the risk
of vehicles entering on to the highway in multiple places.
Engineering Analysis:
Engineering has reviewed the sketch plan. They have no problems with the proposed
parking plan. Their only suggestion for the parking lot is for the applicant to install a bollard
or traffic island on the northern most side of the parking space labeled number "1".
They have also requested that the all the entrances to Parcels 9A and 9B be consolidated into
a single entrance. Furthermore, they request that when the applicant removes these entrances
that there be frontage improvements matching the existing curb and sidewalks. However, as
an interim solution, staff has determined that the use ofbollards or other means for blocking
off vehicUlar access will be sufficient until the applicant receives site plan approval for the
planned building on Parcels 9 and 9C.
Waiver Requests:
Site Plan Requirements
The owner has requested a site plan waiver. He has submitted a sketch plan with the
application for the special use permit (see Attachment A). Both the Zoning and Engineering
Departments and VDOT have agreed that the sketch plan provides adequate information to
determine if the points of access canbe safely closed off and parking provided on the site.
Under Section 32.2.1 (e) of the Ordinance, a full site plan is required by if there is a change
in the points of access to a public road. Since Zoning and Engineering have the information
that they require, it is unnecessary to make the applicant create a site plan. Therefore, staff
accepts the sketch plan in lieu of the site plan and supports the applicant's request for a site
plan waiver under Section 32.2.2.
Angled and Parallel Parking Authorization
Under Section 4.12.6.5(c), the applicant has requested that the Planning Commission
authorized the use of angled and parallel parking within this development. The Engineering
Department has found no problems with either the angled or parallel parking on this plan.
The Planning Department believes that neither the angled nor parallel parking presents a
problem.
One- Way Circulation Authorization
Under Section 4.12.6.2, the applicant has requested that the Planning Commission authorize
the use of one-way circulation within this development. Staffbelieves that the one-way
circulation will not pose a significant hazard. Staff recommends that the one-way circulation
be limited exclusively to pattern shown on the provided sketch plan.
SUMMARY:
Staff has identified the following factors, which are favorable to this request:
1. The proposed use fills a demonstrated need in the western part of the County.
2. The proposal adaptively reuses the existing building.
3. The provision of parking and safe ingress/egress be ensured with the conditions
recommended by staff and agreed to by the applicant.
Staff has identified the following factors, which are unfavorable to this request:
1. The Comprehensive Plan shows this area to be rural and commercial uses in the rural
area are not viewed to be in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan. The property,
however, has been used for commercial development for year and had commercial
zoning prior to the 1980 Comprehensive rezoning of the County.
2. The owner is not prepared to permanently close one of the entrances at this time.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of this special use permit with the following conditions:
1. The owner shall provide for the parking and directional signage in general accord with
the improvements shown on the sketch plan, prepared by Raymond E. Gaines, Architect
titled "Crozet Laundry" and last revised 9/19/01 prior to opening the laundromat use
granted under this Special Use Permit. The individual parking spaces shall be
permanently delineated on the site.
2. The owner shall close the eastern most access point on Tax Map 56A3 Parcel 9A in a
manner that meets with the approval of the Albemarle County Department of Engineering
and Public Works. The requirements of this condition shall be preformed prior to
opening the laundromat use granted under this Special Use Permit.
3. The applicant shall provide a traffic island or bollards to protect the parking space
designated number "1" on the sketch plan.
7
ATTACHMENTS:
A "Sketch Plan" dated 9/19/00
B - Applicant's petition
TM 5GA(3)
PARCEL
TM 5GA(2)
PARCEL O I
I ~°11-' I/2 5TOP-,Y
FRAME
EXIST.
ASPHALT
PARKING LOT
"- .... TM 56A(5) '" .........
0.88 MI.+- TO
RT. 8 I 0
,.ST. RT. :240
(THREE NOTCH'D ROAD)
PARKING PLAN
SCALE: , = 20'
PARCEL CDA
TAX MAP 5GA(3)
TM 5GA(3)
PARCEL tl
RECEIVED
5EP ~ !') 20fl'i
COMMIJNITY DEV El. Ort',4 EN1F
PARKING PLAN BASED ON 5URVFY BY ~,. AUE <EY
HUFFMAN DATED AUGUS~r 29. 200
BPECIAL USE PERMIT 5P OI 023 HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR
ALL PARKING FOR PAIRCE' 9C IS ON EXISTING FAVEMENT
PARKING SUMMARY
SPACED REQ'D PER COUNTY LETTER )ATED 8-29-01: 25
SPACES PROVIDED: 2G
i,i
Z
.J
m
J
From : ._Ton .?_, Ce.r-o]
PHONE No. : 540289S289
Sep. 26 2001 5:58PM
ATTACHMENT B
P01
JEFFRIES, INC.
T/A BROWNSVILLE MARKET
5995 ROCKFISH 'Fl[) RNPIKE
CROZET, VA. 22932
434-823-5251
SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY
THE UNDER SIGNED WOULD SUPPORT
A LOCAL LAUNDRYMAT IN CROZET~VA
ADDRESS
10
From : Jon& Carol Qumsmnbmrr~ PHONE No. : 5402895289 Smp. 26 2081 G:3SPM PS2
JEFFR1ES, INC.
T/A BROWNSVILLE MARKET
5995 ROCKFISIi TUI~aNPIKE
CROZET, VA. 22932
434-823-$251
SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY' SURVEY
THE UNDER SIGNED WOULD SUPPORT
A LOCAL LAUNDRYMAT IN CROZET,VA
JEFFRIES, ]NC.
T/A BROWNSVILLE MAR~LET
5995 ROCKFISH TIJRN'PIKE
CROZET, VA. 22932
434-823-5251
SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY
THE UNDER SIGNED'WOULD SUPPORT
A LOCAL L~UNDRYMAT IN CROZET,VA
~.__¢~~ _. _:.~.,:--,.,?_.~..,,- , %--'":
V>
Vf>
12
From : 3on ~ Ca~o! Qu~s~nb~ PHONE No. : 5402895289 S~p. 26 2001 5:39Phl PD4
JEFFRIES, INC.
T/A BROWNSVILLE MARKET
5995 ROCKFISH TURNPIKE
CROZET, VA. 22932
434-823-5251
SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY
THE UNDER SIGNED WOULD SUPPORT
A LOCAL LAUNDRYMAT IN CROZET~VA
/
(,~
13
S~p, 26 2001 5:40PM P~5
3EFFRIES, INC.
T/A BROWNSVILLE MARKET
$9.95 ROCKFISII TURNPIKE
CROZET, VA. 22932
434-823-5251
SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY
THE UNDER SIGNED WOULD SUPPORT
A LOCAL LAUNDRYMAT IN CROZI=T~VA
,~s ............... /,~,~,~'~ /A ,, ................................
14
From : Jori D Carol gu~$~nb~rrg PHONE No.
2001
3:40PM
P06
JEFFR1ES, INC.
T/A BROWNSVil~I~E MARKET
5995 ROCKFi,4;iH TI]RNPIKE
CROZET, VA. 22932
434-823'5251
84
86
87...
SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY SURVEY
THE UNDER SIGNED WOULD SUPPORT
A LOCAL LAUNDRYMAT IN CROZET~VA
01 ~DDRESa
15
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing: CPA 98-03, Post Office Land Trust
(Hollymead Town Center)
SUBJECTIPROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan land use
designation for approximately 180 acres of land west of
Route 29, south of Airport Road and east of the
Deerwood Subdivision.
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Cilimberg, Benish
AGENDA DATE:
October 10, 2001
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: Yes
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWED BY:
INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND:
A proposal to amend the Lands Use Plan recommendations for this area has been under review by the Planning
Commission since the spdng of 1998. In October 2000, the Commission recommended an amendment to change the
land use designation from a combination of Office Service, Regional Service and Industrial Service to a Town Center
designation which encouraged a mixed-use, urban scale development concept which included residential, as well as
retail, service and office uses. During the Board's review of the Planning Commission's recommended amendment,
property owners within the proposed Town Center area expressed concern over some of the recommendations in the
proposed amendment language. On February 7, 2001, the Board deferred action on the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment in order to allow the property owners to develop their-proposal for a master plan for the Town Center
consisting of development and design guidelines. A Master Plan was submitted on July 20~ to the Planning
Department for review. Staff reviewed the propOsed Master Plan comparing it to the Planning Commission's
recommended amendment language. This analysis was presented and discussed at a Board work session on
September 5, 2001. Based on the direction received from the Board at that meeting, staff has been working with the
property owners to address the major differences between the Planning Commission's recommended amendment and
the property owner's proposed Master Plan.
DISCUSSION:
Attachment A is the Planning Commission's recommended amendment language for the Town, Center, with
modifications that address the major issues/differences/inconsistencies with the proposed Master Plan. The changes
are in bold or strike through type. Staff comments are provided in bold anditalic print. A summary of the major
issues/differences and how they have been addressed is provided below:
The recommendation for a floor area ratio (FAR) of .75 in the Commission's amendment for Town Center
development
This has been addressed by reducing the recommended net FAR to .50 and modifying the text to emphasize that
this is an ultimate build out goal (p.4, Attachment A). Site design will need to accommodate future phasing of
development or redevelopment to achieve this higher density development.
· The limit on compatible Iow FAR regional service uses of no more than '65,000 square feet on a single floor
for the Mixed Use/Regional Service area
The text has been modified (p.4, Attachment A) to indicate that certain types of retail stores, such as department
stores, home improvement and grocery stores, are appropriate for this area and can/will be larger than 65,000,
and based on current market/demographic characteristics Will not locate in multi-story buildings. Negative aspects
of this form of development (bulk, massing) will be address through architectural treatment, and building and site
orientation and design measures.
The property owners' proposal for an at-grade crossing (intersection) at the mid-point of the Town Center
site between the Timberwood Boulevard and Hollymead Drive
The text has been changed to include the possibility of establishing a mid-point access at a new cro-ssover if
warranted by traffic studies and conditions (p.7and 9, Attachment A).
The recommendation for a one hundred foot undisturbed vegetative buffer along the Town Center frontage
of Route 29
The site has been subject to a recent logging activity. No significant vegetation remains along the frontage of Route
29. This recommendation has been removed.
in summary, staff has been working with the property owners to come to an agreement on amendment language that
addresses these major issues in a manner consistent with the Board's directives. Other, more minor, modifications have
also been made to make the Master Plan and amendment language consistent. Staff believes that there is general
agreement with the text amendment provided in Attachment A.
RECOMMENDATION:
if the modifications to the amendment language adequately address the Board's issues, staff recommends approval the
text and map amendment.
Attachments:
A - Revised text amendment
B - Hollymead Land Use Plan Map amendment
ATTACHMENT A
(10-04-01 version)
NOTE: Provided below in bold are modifications to the Planning Commission's proposed amendment language reviewed
by the Board on September 5, 2001. These modifications make the amendment language more in keeping with the
proposed Master Plan, are reflective of the direction provided by the Board during their discussion of the proposal on
September 5th, and incorporate changes generally agreed to by the land owners and staff and consistent with the Board's
directive. Staff has provided a bdef explanation after the more significant changes. These comments are in bold and
italic print.
Proposed Language to be added tO the Hollymead Community Profile, Recommendations (page 78, Land Use
Plan)
The area designated as Town Center west of Route 29 and south of Airport Road is intended as a mixed--user,
hi~ generally more compact, higher density area containing a mixture of businesses, services, public
facilities, residential areas and c~c thc*. c~rccts public spaces, attracting activities of all kinds. Nearby
residential development will be of high enough densities to support many of these uses.
This designation replaces the previous patchwork of regional service, office service and industrial service areas in
an effort to establish a more unified planning and development process
The Town Center should adhere to the following twelve design principles as further defined in the General
Development/Design Guidelines; 1) pedestrian orientation, 2) neighborhood fdendly streets and paths, 3)
interconnected streets and transportation networks, 4) parks and open spaces, 5) neighborhood centers, 6)
buildings and spaces of human scale, 7) relegated parking, 8) mixture of uses, 9) mixture of housing types, 10)
redevelopment rather than abandonment, 11) site planning that respects terrain, and 12) clear edges.
The Town Center is intended to incorporate features that conserve land, provide a "critical mass" of uses
and achieve a high level of interaction of activities. Ultimately, it is intended that portions of the Town
~Center include such features as wide sidewalks, on-street parking and parking integrated with uses, multi-
story structures and residential uses above commercial and retail uses. Stand-alone residential is also
appropriate in an urban form.
in addition to other applicable recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan, the Town Center shall be
developed in general accord with the Conceptual Master Plan & Design Guidelines for the Hollymead ToWn
Center, dated July 20, 2001, by Daggett & Grigg (the "Master Plan").
These additions more fully define the intent of the Hollymead Town Center and identify the proposed Master
Plan as a guiding document in the planning/development of the Town Center.
General Development/Desi,qn Guidelines
The following are general guidelines for the entire area designated as a Town Center in the Hotlymead Community.
LAND USE and DENSITY
· A mix of residential and non-residential land uses shall be provided within the Town Center, including Urban
Density Residential (6 to 34 du/ac.), Office Service Community Service, Public/Institutional uses including parks
and greenways,_,'---",.....,., .... .~.,...,...,..~;~"~' Regional Service and compatible Industrial Service.
· Uses not considered desirable for this area include heavy industrial and manufacturing uses, and other
*'""~;*;'-"'"".,.....,.,.., ,..,,~ large land consuming uses such as warehousing (including self storage facilities), and auto
Commercial and residential development should strive to ultimately achieve higher densities than those
achieved historically. Development in some areas of the Town Center, particularly in the Mixed
Use/Regional Service Area, likely will not provide as high a density initially or in the foreseeable future as
densities achievable in other areas of the Town Center, but development in all areas should be designed so
as not to preclude higher densities, through subsequent redevelopment and/or infill, when the market
demographics are such as will Justify and support denser development features, including structured
parking and multi.story retail. The desired overall density for the ultimate build-out of the Town Center is a
FAR of .50. The desired .50 FAR overall density contemplates a net of ail open space, road, street and
travel ways, as well as public amenities. Nothing herein shall be interpreted as limiting the FAR for the
Town Center.
While it is desirable for single story buildings to not exceed 65,000 square feet, it is recognized that large
stores, some much larger than 65,000 square feet on one level, such as department stores, home improvement
stores and supermarkets, are appropriate in the Mixed Use/Regional Service Area (see Master Plan, Figure
14A). Issues of bulk, massing and pedestrian accessibility for all buildings, but particularly for single story
stores over 65,000 square feet, may be addressed through various design concepts, such as building
fa~',adelroof, line treatments, building orientation and/or other measures, so as to dilute their appearance as
large, monolithic boxes and to facilitate subdividing these stores in the event of the need for re-tenanting with
smaller stores.
The changes above lower the expected ultimate build-out FAR to .5 establish and address the issue of the
timing/expectation for achieving the ultimate FAR, specifically for the Mixed Use/Regional Service area. This
also eliminates the recommendation that have limited the foot print size of the buildings in the Mixed
USe/Regional Service area.
A significant residential component ~=..,""*;";""*'~';,,,..,,......~ .......,..=h,~,,',4 ...~,,, located within the designated Town Center, both
mixed with other commercial/office uses and within walking distance (approx. % mile from the center of the Town
Center).
Development of this area =hall bc pursuant to approval of an overall development plan for the Town Center area
is desired. Approval of Development Plans for portions of the Town Center may be necessary and appropriate in
certain situations, but ~= Icc= de.=~rablo should be in general accord with the Master Plan.
SITE DESIGN
To achieve the intent of the Master Plan:
· All building facades visible from a public road =hall should continue design elements present on the front of the
building.
OrieP, t Buildings should he oriented to streets and (parking relegated as addressed in the Master Plan. behiP, d
· Site development should respect the terrain and use appropriate design techniques to minimize cleadng and
grading activities.
· Roof designs shall should mitigate the visual impact of larger scale structures and associated bUildings,
especially considering the general location of this area along a ridgeline.
· Loading docks, trash collection facilities, outdoor storage and related facilities :hall should be incorporated into
building design so they are not visible.
· Metal buildings should not be permitted.
· ok,.~ll
· A system of walkways and bikeways ...... should be included in site design.
Parking:
A......,.; ........k... ~ [;...;,,~ ,.. ,k.., ..... ;....~ k,. +k~ ?..,.;..,. ~..; ..... king in of that necessary
-, .,, ~, ....... =, .............................. n ......] ........... =, ....... ;.,u~,, Par excess
to support individual uses in the Town Center is discouraged.
-Parking should be centralized where appropriate. Cooperative parking arrangements are encouraged where
feasible.
-On-street parking :hall should be incorporated into road design for categories of streets where on-street
parking is contemplated in the Master Plan.
-Large parking areas should be divided into smaller components '--'~ ,~-'.-+.~k,,,.~. ...... .~ .,. k~.r.~..,~ ~,,,... ...... ;*k
pavemeP, t using travel ways and median breaks with trees and other landscaping material used to minimize
visual impacts and heat generated by large areas of pavement.
· - ............ u Minimize parking areas between streets and buildings, as addressed in the Master Plan,
Establish a landscape edge to the on the east side of the Town Center along Route29 consistent with the
ultimate design of Route 29 (urban or rural cross-section design) generally as contemplated in the Master
Plan.
A portion of the Town Center property was subject to timbering activity recently. The existing vegetation up to
the Route 29 right-of, way has been cleared. Little vegetation remains along the frontage of Route 29.
Therefore, the lO0.foot buffer cannot be achievec~ The Master Plan establishes general design concepts to be
considered for the edge treatment based on the ultimate design of Route 29 that are acceptable in terms of
establishing general concepts of design.
TRANSPORTATION, TOWN CENTER AREA
(See also the TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT section for specific recommendations for improvements
along the Route 29 Corridor)
· Transit service should be provided as soon as operation is feasible and site design shall accommodate future
transit service.
All roads should be designed with the intent of providing pedestrian friendly neighborhood oriented streets. All
roads in this ~=" ;""~'"~;"- "'~' '-'"*~"""-"~' .... '~'~ '""`4 should be constructed as an urban cross-section, with
sidewalks, bike-laF~ and street landscaping. Lower design speeds and minimizing road width (number of through
lanes) should be encouraged. However, on-street parking should be encouraged where appropriate. A system
of bike lanes should be accommodated as generally depicted in the Master Plan, including ail roads, which
connect to lands adjacent to the Town Center.
The road network for the Town Center should consist of a system of interconnected streets forming a network of
blocks. The network should consist of a minimum of two (2) north-south roads with crossing streets creating a
block pattem. Shorter block lengths consistent with the intent of creating a walkable community should be
provided. The desirable block lengths would be between 200 and 300 feet, although longer block lengths may
be permissible based on traffic, topographic, and/or other site conditions.
The Town Center road network ...... Should include connections to Route 29 at Timberwood Boulevard and
Hollymead Ddve :~-,~ '";"; ..... ~ .... ;" '-'-;-* ...... ~,-~-'-, '~
............................. r- ......... ~ ......... .~_ CrC~.,,.~ .....~ ~.,.,, ..... ~,,~ u,~u .... ,4
T~,-,,~. ...... `4 .......;..,.~. ~ ...... ~'"" ~'~ Airp (2) 1)
........................................ . . provide for access to ort Road at two locations: the future
North Fork Research park access on Airport Road; and, 2) a future cross over located just west of the U. S. Post
Office Building.
One mid-point access between Hollymead Drive and Timberwood Drive may utilize a new crossover on Route
29, if warranted by traffic studies and conditions. Given the current road infrastructure in the vicinity of the
Town Center, such a crossover is an important element of the Town Center and is a critical ingredient for a
Boulevard/Main Street entrance into the development from Route 29. Once the ultimate transportation network
for the Town Center and surrounding environs is in place the continuing need for such a crossover may be
reconsidered.
This change allows for the possibility of establishing a cross-over on Route 29 at the mid-point entrance
location based on traffic analysis and conditions and staff believes is conalstent with Board's prior discussion
on this issue.
The north/south parallel road should be designed as a "Boulevard" or 'Main Street" (as depicted in Figures 4
and 5 of the Master Plan), recognizing that while carrying a higher volume of traffic, it also serves as an
important Neighborhood Street within the Town Center concept. As such, the road needs to accommodate
pedestrians, cyclists, and transit service and contribute positively to the character of the area. Other streets in the
Town Center may be designed as a "Main Street," ~Avenue," 'Neighborhood Street," or "Way" depending on the
character and intensity of development in the area (Master Plan, Figures 5, 6, and 7).
· Pedestrian and bicycle systems and transit access c. ha!l should be provided throughout the Town Center, with a
continuous walkway and travel way provided from Airport Road and Route 29 North.
Pedestrian activity is encouraged. Sidewalks on both sides of streets built 10 feet wide or greater shall should be
provided in high-density areas, wifh ~;,- ~--+ .-.-;-,; ...... ,],4+~ ~,~ ..... ~'"'-~ four feet minimum width on some streets
elsewhere as contemplated in the Master Plan.
· ~-k-~ll
· A park and nde lot ......should be established near the town conter area.
· A network of subsidiary cross streets linking ali major roads in a street block system shall should be established
throughout the larger site. Linkages shall be made to existing developed areas where possible (Dee[wood, Forest
Springs).
This point has been covered in other recommendations and is no longer necessary.
Grade separated vehicular crossings of Route 29 are recommended at Timberwood Boulevard and Hollymead
Drive. Bicycle/pedestrian facilities shall be provided as part of grade separated crossings to provide pedestrian
connectivity between the east and west sides of Route 29. These should be located at or near Timberwood
Boulevard and HollYmead Drive. Sidewalks and bike facilities shall also be provided to link to planned facilities
along Airport Road as contemplated in the Master Plan.
PUBLIC SPACE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES/SERVICES
· Open space, recreation areas and public spaces shall be provided to serve patrons, employees, and community
residents. Development of public open space/features such as a public square, traffic circles, and "pocket
park(s)" should be provided throughout the Town Center area.
A greenway shall be established along the stream forming the western and southern boundary of the Town Center
~ and should include walking and bike trails and other features/amenities. This greenway and
associated trails should extend across Route 29 to link to the residential areas east of Route 29 and ultimately to
the proposed greenway along Powell Creek.
· The Community Facilities Plan indicates a need for a public library and police substation in the Hollymead
Community T~,~.-,, ~-,,.;,,;~. ~.~..,, ,,,~ ~, ...... .',~,,~ ;., +~,~, T ..... ~'...,+ ...... D.,,~-;,,,..~.-.~ +~,~,, ;~, ....... ,, ~. .....
aS a "'~.,.,,..'~"; .... ~' ....... U=,,..= '"+,,,.. The Town Center may be a desirable location for these and other such public
facilities.
· Space shall be made available for a recYCling center (not counted against square footage limits).
ENVIRONMENT
· Regional stormwater facilities shall be established to serve this portion of the Hollymead Community.
· Exemplary specimen or old growth trees that may exist in this area shall be preserved to the extent practicable.
· Area landscaping shall minimize water requirements
- Principles of sustainable design shall be incorporated to a significant extent in site development, including use of
natural lighting within buildings, ,~rcc,", -'-'-~ +----"-'--' ....
.............. ~, and energy efficiency.
Road Improvements, Route 29 Corridor and Proffit Road
Amendment to Hollymead Community Profile Recommendations (pp. 78-81)
Adopted, 2/7/01 (CPA 2000-05)
Transportation improvements include..· (p.80)
Recommended improvements along the Route 29 Corridor:
1. Road design and alignment improvements to Route 29 should be in keeping with the emerging community consisting
of a mix of residential neighborhoods, and commercial and employment centers. Improvements related to upgrading
Route 29 shall be consistent with an overall network of intemonnecting roads that balance the need to serve both the
local and regional transportation demands.
2. Parallel or adjunct roads east and west of Route 29 should be designed and located in a manner consistent with other
land use and transportation recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Any system of parallel roads to augment Route 29 should be constructed as an urban cross-section design
(curb/gutter) with sidewalks and bike lanes. This creates a system of roads more in keeping with a neighborhood
street system and more consistent with the character of the adjacent neighborhoods.
4. Recommendations for road design/classification for the parallel roads are taken from the Albemarle County
Neighborhood Model as recommended by the Development Area Initiatives Study Committee (DISC) Report. Road
design should be an "Avenue/Residential Boulevard" or"Neighborhood Street" design on the eastern parallel road from
Polo Grounds Road to Hollymead Drive; a "Main Street" design on the eastern parallel road from the cemetery to
Proffit Road; a "Boulevard" or "Main Street" design on the westem parallel road system transitioning to
"Avenue/Residential Boulevard" or "Main Street" south to Hollymead Ddve extended.
5. The eastern parallel road system should extend to Polo Grounds Road (Route 643).
6. The southern end of any western parallel road system should terminate at a connection with Hollymead Drive
Extended.
7. Hollymead Ddve and Timberwood Parkway should be designed with grade-separated crossings of Route 29, without
ramps, to connect with the road system on the western side of Route 29 and accommodate east-west vehicular,
pedestrian and bicycle movements with the appropriate facilities.
8. Provide a grade-separated crossing without ramps at Airport Road to accommodate east-west vehicular, pedestrian
and bicycle movements with the appropriate facilities.
9. Based on development patterns east of Route 29, provide grade separated bicycle/pedestrian
overpasses/underpasses to accommodate east-west movement.
10. East-west connecting roads should be curb/gutter design with sidewalks/bike lanes and the design should be
"Avenue/Residential Boulevard" or "Main Street~ design.
11. in the long term, consider establishing an east-west connection from Route 29 to Earlysville Road (Route 743) as
recommended in the Charlottesville Area Transportation Study (CATS) by extending Hollymead Drive to Earlysville
Road. This road location and design should be coordinated with the relocation of Dickerson Road (Route 606).
12. Intermediate accesses, without crossovers, to Route 29 should be provided on the east side between Ashwood
Boulevard and Timberwood Boulevard and west side between Hollymead Drive and Timberwood Boulevard, except
one mid-point access between Hollymead Drive and Timberwood Drive may utilize a new cross-over on Route
29 if. warranted by traffic studies and conditions. Given the current road infrastructure in the vicinity of the
Tow~ Center, such a crossover is an important element of the Town Center and is a critical ingredient for a
Boulevard/Main Street entrance into the development from Route 29. Once the ultimate transportation network
for the Town Center and surrounding environs is in place the continuing need for such a crossover may be
reconsidered.
13.
14.
Stop the northern end of the eastem parallel road at Hollymead Drive and access undeveloped land north of
Hollymead directly from Route 29, without a crossover. This will avoid significant impact to existing homes in
Hollymead.
Proffit Road (Route 649) should be constructed with a UNeighborhood Street" design from Worth Crossing to Lanford
Hills Drive, including sidewalks and bike lanes. The section from Route 29 to Worth Crossing should be designed in
a manner necessary to accommodate transition to the ultimate improvements to Route 29 and Airport Road. A major
upgrade of Proffit Road east of Lanford Hills to Route 20 is not recommended; however, minimal spot safety
improvements may be appropriate in certain locations.
The Master Plan does not address road improvements outside of the Town Center area other than the proposal
for an at. grade crossover at the intermediate access recommended in #12, above.
PREPARED BY OFF]CE OF lAPPING GRAPHICS
AND INFORMATION RESOURCES ]~OAIIO
ATTACHMENT B
~IORTH PINES
MAP F
I
COMMUNITIES OF o ~soo 30oo
HOLLYMEAD AND ~'=~ooo'
PINEY MOUNTA]N
Figure 14A. MIXED USE/REGIONAL SERVICE CENTER
1 STOR'~
Ella ,Carey
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bruce Appleyard [bappleyard@selcva.org]
Monday, October 08, 2001 2:06 PM
Ella Carey
FW: Hollymead Town Center CPA
Dear Ella,
I would greatly appreciate it if you could please make sure that all the
Supervisors receive my letter below.
Thank you,
Bruce
---Original Message--B
From: Bruce Appleyard
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 1:48 PM
To: David Bowerman (E-mail); Sally Thomas; Charlotte Humphds; Undsay
Dorrier; Chades Martin; Walter Perkins
Cc: Wayne Cilimberg; David Benish; Bob Tucker
Subject: Hoilymead Town Center CPA
Dear Members of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors,
We are writing to you regarding to the Post Office Land Trust (Hollymead
Town Center) Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 98-03) that is scheduled to
go before you for public hearing and possible approval on October 10, 2001.
SELC strongly supports the concept of a Hotlymead town-center and its
purpose of creating a vibrant, mixed use, pedestrian-friendly environment
that is appropriately scaled, easily accessible and thoughtfully designed.
We also support the DISC model, which spells out this vision in greater
detail. One of the major benefits of such a development concept is that, if
done properly, it can minimize the amount of automobile traffic generated by
being accessible via multiple transportation alternatives (walking, transit,
biking, etc.), or by a single auto trip instead of several. Therefore, the
development of a true "town center", consistent with the DISC Neighborhood
Model, could effectively lower the need for the construction of new roads or
widening of existing ones in this area of the 29 corridor.
However, wa are very concerned that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment before
you will lead to a development paffem that is inconsistent with DISC, and
will further contribute to the serious sprawl and traffic problems in the
County. We therefore urge you to reject or modify some of the changes
recommended by the developers.
The report accompanying this CPA, "Conceptual Master Plan & Design
Guidelines for Hollymead Town Center" is a deceptive document - it relies on
many DISC-like images and language, but rather than laying the foundation
for a town center, it is opening the door for the development of a big-box
regional center, which will further clog Route 29 North with trafrm and
accelerate the need for more highways and highway lanes in this cdfical
area of the County.
As'you are aware, in light of this Comprehensive Plan Amendment and VDOT's
proposal for widening Route 29 and building parallel access roads, we hired
Walter Kulash, a nationally recognized transportation engineer, and his firm
of Glatting Jackson to review these transportation and land use proposals.
Mr. Kulash's report outlines how modestly scaled DiSC-like land use
policies, coupled with the creation of a network of locally serving streets,
could effectively reduce the need for the widening of 29 and the
construction of new major roads in this area.
Creating a true town center requires a comprehensive and disciplined
approach to development. Unfortunately, the comprehensive plan amendment
before you effectively undermines the ability to create a true town center.
Furthermore, with the County now poised to employ the DISC master planning
process, it does not make sense to move ahead with this amendment when a
much more comprehensive effort to guide the development of this area can
take place in a fairly short pedod of time.
In order to create a true Town Center that will achieve this objective of
minimizing congestion on Route 29, we would like to make the following
recommendations:
First, reinstate the 65,000 square foot cap on each individual use and
refocus the intent of development into one that serves the needs of the
Hoflymead and Forest Lakes community and not the entire region. Removing the
65,000 square foot cap on each individual use and specifically allowing for
big-box retail in this area, as the developers have proposed, makes this a
regional center, not a town center, and is almost certain to eliminate any
chance of creating a human-scaled community at this location. Furthermore,
such uses will generate tremendous amounts of traffic, which will likely
require the construction of major roads in the area.
Second, we recommend that you require all buildings to maintain a minimum
FAR of .5 and reinstate the average FAR target of .75. Lowering the average
FAR to .5 and not having a minimum FAR for each building will allow
development to be sprawiad out, counter to the spirit and stated intent of
DISC Neighborhood Model. The big-box, regional service component of this CPA
actually presents an FAR of around .2-.3, and will be virtually no different
from any other big-box development along the 29 corridor in terms of the
land it will consume and the auto traffic it will generate.
Third, we recommend that you reject the proposed extra access point and
crossover between Hollymead Ddve and 'l'imbenvood Drive. Adding an at-grade
access point will only further congest 29 with traffic and accelerate the
need to widen it and possibly to construct other major new roads in the
area. If the intent is to develop a true town center, then a single
automobile access point on 29 should be enough, If you decide you must
provide this access point, we recommend that at the very least you not allow
it to cross over to the northbound lanes. By making it a
right-turn-in/right-turn-out driveway you will minimize its congestive
effects on Route 29, We continue to recommend, however, that muitimodal
overpasses or underpasses be constructed to properly connect this 'q'own
Center" to Hollymead and Forest. Lakes communities while, at the same time,
avoiding clogging Route 29 with unnecessary traffic.
Fourth, we recommend that there be a maximum block length of 500 feet. The
proposed road network will not effectively accommodate pedestrian trips
because many of the blocks are too long to be waikable. In some cases they
are more than 1,000 feet! This radically undermines the intent of DISC and
all it does to create walkabie communities. Maintaining the target block
length of 200-300 feet and specifying a maximum block iength of 500 feet
will allow enough flexibility to deal with the terrain of the site while, at
the same time, supporting the creation of a waikable street network.
Furthermore, it should be recognized that most of the land that makes up
this proposed "Town Center" is currently zoned Rural Areas, the lowest
category of development intensity allowed by the County's Zoning Ordinance.
in the future, in order for the public, county staff, and the Board to be
fully informed about the degree of change in development pattems that a
particular CPA can allow, we recommend that ali Comprehensive Plan
Amendments include a map indicating the current zoning of the site. In
conclusion, we respectfully ask that you delay the approval of this CPA
until you have employed the DISC Master Planning process for this growth
area. By doing so, you will more likely create a true town center that will
effectively serve the needs of the communities of the Hollymead growth area,
and minimize the generation of unnecessary automobile traffic.
If you decide to address this proposal before the DISC master planning
process can be employed for the Hotlymead Growth Area, we strongly urge you
to incorporate ali of our recommendations outlined above into the CPA. In
doing so, you will have laid the groundwork for the creation of a valuable
and accessible tow~ center that strengthens the integrity of our growth
areas, minimizes the traffic on mute 29 and thereby lowers the need to
build new majors or road lanes in this area of the county.
We appreciate your consideration of these comments. Please contact us if
you would like to discuss any of the points we have raised.
Sincerely,
Bruce Appleyard
Transportation and Land Use Planner
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Members, Board of Supervisor~0X,.,,
Ella Washington Carey, CMC,'~ ~
Reading List for October I 0, 2001
October 4, 2001
April 25, 2001
September 12, 2001
Ms. Thomas
Ms. Humphris