The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1993-03-22 FIN A L 1:00 P.M. March 22, 1993 Room 7, County Office Building Work Session - 1993-94 County Bud~t 1) Call to Order. 2) Bud2et Work Session: 1: 00 - Parks & Recreation, Patrick Mullaney - Page 160 - Rivanna Park - Page 175 - Teen Center - Page 174 1: 10 - Jefferson Madison Regional Library, Donna Selle - Page 176 1: 20 - Virginia Discovery Museum, Peppy G. Linden - Page 178 1: 30 - Piedmont Council of the Arts, Cat Maguire - Page 179 1: 40 - Literacy Volunteers, Connie Porter - Page 180 (P25) 1: 50 - WVPT, Arthur Albrecht - Page 181 2:00 - Paramount Theatre, Sheldon Anderson - Page 183 2: 10 - Thomas Jefferson Visitors Bureau, Bobbye Cochran - Page 182 2: 10 - Planning & Community Development, Wayne Cilimberg - Page 186 2: 20 - Redevelopment & Housing, Karen Morris - Page 188 2:30 - Zoning, Amelia McCulley - Page 190 2: 40 - Soil & Water Conservation District, Alyson Sappington - Page 192 2:45 - VPI-SU Extension Service, Charlie Goodman - Page 193 2:55 - BREAK 3:05 - Gypsy Moth, Steven Meeks - Page 194 3:15 - Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission, Nancy O'Brien - Page 195 3:25 - Albemarle Housing Improvement Program, Theresa Tapscott - Page 198 (P9) 3: 35 - Monticello Area Community Action Agency, Ken Ackerman - Page 197 (P27) 3: 45 - Charlottesville Transit Service, Helen Poore - Page 196 - Pantops/Route 29 3: 50 - City-County Revenue Sharing Agreement - Page 201 - Debt Service - Page 203 - Capital Improvements Transfer 3) Status Report - Recycling Program. 4) Salary Supplements for State Funded Positions Report. 5) Draft Statement for 1993-94 Spring Preallocation Hearing. 6) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 7) Adjourn to March 24, 1993, at 3:00 P.M. () Program Review ... Edward H. B in, Jr. Samuel Mill r COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville David P. Bow rman Charlottesvil e Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. umphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins While Hall MEMORANDUM TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., county Executive FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ElUG DATE: March 23, 1993 S BJECT: Board Actions of March 22, 1993 (Afternoon Meeting, Work Session - 1993-94 County Budget) Following is a list of actions taken by the Board at its meeting on M rch 22, 1993 (afternoon meeting): Agenda Item No.2. Budget Work Session: Parks & Recreation - No change recommended. Rivanna Park - No change recommended. Teen Center - Add $19,328 for operations to be put on list of unfunded i ems to be considered. Change $18,300 to $36,959 on page 174. Jefferson Madison Regional Library - No change recommended. Virginia Discovery Museum - No change recommended. Literacy Volunteers - No change recommended. WVPT - No change recommended. e ed. Paramount Theatre - Add $20,000 to list of unfunded items to be consid- Thomas Jefferson Visitors Bureau - No change recommended. Planning & Community Development - Add $17,685 for a Housing Coordinator t list of unfunded items to be considered. * Printed on recycled paper .. To: Dalte: Page: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. March 23, 1993 2 Redevelopment & Housing - No change recommended. Delete the word "audit" on page 188. Soil & Water Conservation District - No change recommended. Change '91- 92 to '92-93 and $8,880 to $7,880 on page 192. Gypsy Moth - No change recommended. Zoning - Add $3,050 for a site plan mylar storage cabinet to list of urfunded items to be considered. Delete the request for three lan connections at $1,950. VPI-SU Extension Service - No change recommended. Albemarle Housing Improvement Program - Add $25,935 for expanded rehab plogram and $26,035 for expanded emergency repair program to list of unfunded it ems to be considered. Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission - Add $10,392 for mapping ard demography center to list of unfunded items to be considered. Monticello Area Community Action Agency - Add $2,645 for funding of full request to list of unfunded items to be considered. Charlottesville Transit Service - No change recommended. Pantops/Route 29 - No change recommended. City-County Revenue Sharing Agreement - No change recommended. Debt Service - No change recommended. Capital Improvements Transfer - No change recommended. Agenda Item No.3. status Report - Recycling Program. The Board added $200,000 for a contingency fund to be added to list of unfunded items for consideration. The Board decided not to adopt a resolution of intent to adopt the Recycling Ordinance at this time. The Board directed staff to redefine the Ordinance and bring back at an a~~ropriate time. I Robert W. Tucker, Jr. March 23, 1993 3 Item No.4. Salary Supplements for State Funded Positions The Board said there was no way they could do anything in this fiscal are The Board will talk to our state representatives to see if additional nding could be given for supplements next year. The Board also directed aff to look at the option of adding the Registrar to the County's merit stem and the ramifications. Item No.5. Draft Statement for 1993-94 Spring Preallocation Mr. Bowerman will read the draft statement. Board members to communi- with Mr. Tucker as to their thoughts. Agenda Item No.6. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the Mr. Bowerman said he would like to see a balanced budget with no reserve $0.72 real property tax rate; he would like to know what could be funded a $0.73 real property tax rate; and, what could be funded with a $0.74 real perty tax rate with a one cent reduction in the personal property tax rate putting $400,000 into the contingency. cc: Robert B. Brandenburger Richard E. Huff, II Roxanne White File BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FY 93-94 PROPOSED BUDGET B ~GINNING RESERVE FUND CPUNTY EXECUTIVE ADJUSTMENTS plus reduction Scottsville Rescue Squad plus Juvenile Detention Home budget reduction plus Joint Security budget reduction plus VRS Life Insurance savings plus savings Emergency Operations Center TlOTAL COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL RESERVE FUND BbARD OF SUPERVISOR (BOS) CHANGES- GENERAL GOVERNMENT Board of Elections part-time Office Assistant Board of Elections terminal/bags/file cabinet Trial Advocacy Course - Commonwealth Attorney Part-time secretary - Sheriff's Dept. Hlg-Band radios - Sheriff's Dept Traffic Officer with motorcycle Patrol Officer Property Clerk (part-time) Narcotics Investigator Conflict Resolution Course - Police Fire Prevention - Inspections equipment Fire/Rescue expanded training Maintenance fire/rescue training center ~CFRA - Hepatitis shots OAR - Third year salary upgrade ~omprehensive Services Act Matching Funds Charlottesville Free Clinic ?-SARA - CAP program JABA - Adult Day Care Program JABA - Adult Day Care Transportation JABA - Case Management JABA - Meadows/Free Union Congregate Meals ~SHE - additional baseline funding Teen Center Paramount Theater r-Housing Coordinator Zoning - Mylar file cabinet ~HIP - Emergency Carpenter Position ~HIP -Expanded Rehab Program T JPDC - Mapping Center MACAA - additional baseline funding Recycling Contingency T(bTAL BOS CHANGES - GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL RESERVE FUND BCPS CHANGES - SCHOOL DIVISION Additional funding for schools TOTAL BOS CHANGES - SCHOOL DIVISION TOTAL RESERVE FUND \. $551,800 650 13,925 815 80,000 6,875 102,265 $654,065 4,655 1,030 1,200 .s,986 ~ 71,095r:f1) 62,670-- -&,115 :(D 51,240 3,OO(} 565 1,835 1,000 15,000 3,725 81 ,320 4,600 --I' 35,750 5,460 -+ 6,240-4 6,430-J" 28,110~ 925 19,328 ----f 20,000 17.685 3,050 26,035-~ 25,935 10,392 2,645 200,000 746,015 (91 ,950) 1,000,000 1,000,000 (1,091 ,950) COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE f(D)~w , .'91!m -: MEMORANDUM JARD OF SUPER\ TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive March 19, 1993 Budget Information/statistical Data we discussed during our worksession on Monday, March 15, staff s developed some information and statistics regarding our budget blic hearings and subsequent work sessions for your information. e attached data is primarily in the form of tables and graphs ich I think you will find to be more easily understood and adable. Generally, the report addresses staffing history, the neral Fund transfer to the School Division, the effective tax te increase as it relates to the advertisement for public hearing April 7th, some additional assessment information and the fects of growth and inflation on the County's budget over the st 13 years. ould you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not sitate to contact me. T,Jr/dbm .057 tachment .......................S<.)Aflt>..<.)F'$PPi;aVI$())3$....f="l'..9:l894.Pf1<.)I?<.)$l%nSQ[)SeT.... EGINNING RESERVE FUND OUNTY EXECUTIVE ADJUSTMENTS plus reduction Scottsville Rescue Squad plus Juvenile Detention Home budget reduction plus Joint Security budget reduction plus VRS Life Insurance savings plus savings Emergency Operations Center 650 13,925 815 80,000 6,875 TAL COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL RESERVE FUND 102.265 OARD OF SUPERVISOR (BOS) CHANGES- GENERAL GOVERNMENT Board of Elections part-time Office Assistant Board of Elections terminal/bags/file cabinet Trial Advocacy Course - Commonwealth Attorney Part-time secretary - Sheriff's Dept. Hlg-Band radios - Sheriff's Dept Traffic Officer with motorcycle Patrol Officer Property Clerk (part-time) Narcotics Investigator Conflict Resolution Course - Police Fire Prevention - Inspections equipment Fire/Rescue expanded training Maintenance fire/rescue training center JCFRA - Hepatitis shots OAR - Third year salary upgrade Comprehensive Services Act Matching Funds Charlottesville Free Clinic SARA - CAP program JABA - Adult Day Care Program JABA - Adult Day Care Transportation JABA - Case Management JABA - Meadows/Free Union Congregate Meals SHE - additional baseline funding 4,655 1,030 1,200 8,980 28,000 71,095 52,670 8,115 51.240 3,000 565 1,835 1,000 15,000 3,725 81,320 4,600 35,750 5,460 6,240 6,430 28,110 925 TAL BOS CHANGES - GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL RESERVE FUND 420.945 S CHANGES - SCHOOL DIVISION Additional funding for schools 1,000,000 TAL BOS CHANGES - SCHOOL DIVISION TOTAL RESERVE FUND 1.000.000 $551.800 $654.065 233.120 (766.880) . , ALBEM~RLE COUNTY BUDGET INFORMATION/STATISTICS The follo'wing information is presented in response to issues that have been raised du ing budget public hearings and worksessions: 1. ALE EMARLE EMPLOYMENT GROWTH FY 89-90 TO FY 92-93 Ger eral Government FY 89-90 FY 92-93 319 355 INCREASE 36 PuJ:>lic Safety Ad~in, Finance, DP PuJ:>lic Works Cc mmunity Development Pa ks 21 6 3 4 2 Schpol Division 1,326 1,522 196 Teacher Aides Teachers Gl idance Counselors Bu~ Drivers 55 86 15 34 TO AL GROWTH 1,645 1,877 232 Exh bit 1 A. Staffing History shows staff growth for General Government and the School Divi~ion from 1988 to 1993 in actual numbers and by population. Exh bit 1 B. Staffing History depicts staff growth by total, by school division, and by gen ~ral government shown for public safety and other. 2. GEt~ERAL GOV'T TRANSFER TO SCHOOL DIVISION Exh bit 2A. Graph shows the school transfer wihtout debt service adjusted for 1980 con stant dollars and growth. Exh bit 2B. Graph shows the ratio in actual dollars between the total school budget, the schl 01 budget without debt service, the total general fund, the school transfer with debt service, the l)chool transfer without debt service and general government operations. Exh bit 2C. In greater detail, this spreadsheet shows the general fund transfer to the schc 01 division since 1981/82. Percentages show the ratio of the transfer to the total schl 01 budget, to the total county budget and to general government operations. Alsc shown is the percentage of the total budget and to general government ope ations when debt service is added. 3. EF FECTIVE TAX RATE INCREASE Pu lication of the effective tax rate increase is required by state code and will be part of t e advertisement for the public hearing on April 7. The Effective Tax Rate increase is t e difference between the current tax rate of .72 and the lowered tax rate of .69. The lowered tax rate is the rate it would take to levy the same amount of real estate tax as I st year. 4. Fair Market Value of Real Estate Fair Market Value of Real Estate ercentage Increase 4,475,117,991 4,695,099,710 4.92% Tax Revenues(including landuse) 1 19 3 Fair Market Value T rate needed (lowered tax rate) 32,220.850 4,695,099,710 $0.69 $0.72 $0.69 $0.03 ive tax increase (.72/.69) 4.35% Exh bit 4A. Graph shows the increase in the total real estate assessment values relative to t e increase in the tax rate since 1981/82. Exh bit 48. Comparative assessment chart shows the percent increases in real estate ass ssment for selected counties and the statewide average from 1980 to 1990. 5C. raph shows general government expenditures (does not include debt service, revenue shar ng, cip transfer) adjusted for constant dollar and growth. 5A. raph shows total budget expenditures from FY80/81 to FY93/94 adjusted for 1980 con tant dollars and population growth. 5. raph shows total school expenditures adjusted for constant dollar and growth. raph shows general government operations without public safety adjusted for constant r and growth. 6. 69.455,309 ERAL FUND PROJECTED BUDGET FY94/95 fy 93/94 fy 94/95 23,242,453 5,667,631 4,319,235 1,360,000 551,800 34,314,190 (assumes 3% inflation) $ inc % inc 23,939,727 6,635,270 4,475,117 1,500,000 o 35,343,616 1,300.000 73.193,729 697,274 967,639 155,882 140,000 (551,800) 1,029,426 1 ,300,000 3.738.420 3.00% 17.07% 3.61% 10.29% -100.00% 3.00% ERR 5.38% 64,279,645 66,321,694 2,042,049 3.18% 5,008,617 5,489,208 480,591 9.60% 167,047 69,455,309 71 ,810,902 2,355.593 3.39% all 0 (1 ,382,827) 7. DEBT ERVICE INFORMATION Exh bit 7A. Chart shows ratio of increase in debt service to total general fund exp nditures and debt per capita since 1985. Increase in debt service after 1994-95 reflects pro osed additional school projects in the CIP, ego Brownsville and Red Hill exp nsion and Phase II of AHS. Without those new projects, total debt service would decline. Exh bit 78. Payment schedule for Middle School VPSA bond to show impact of fixe principal payments on early years of debt service costs. 8. T RATE INFORMATION RATE EQUIVALENT e of $.01 on real estate tax e of $.01 on personal property tax Ave age residential assessment 1992 Ave age residential assessment 1993 Ave age increase residential assessment .. Ave age tax increase on residential assessment On verage residential assessment of $143,910 imp ct of $.01 cent change on tax rate .. a rage assessment including vacant land 446,610 45,330 133,230 143,910 8.01% $76.90 $14.40 11.00% Staffing History General %of %of Year P4 ~pulation Government Total Schools Total Total 1988 63,200 272.75 18.03% 1,240 81.97% 1,512.75 1989 66,120 302.44 18.99% 1,290 81.01% 1,592.44 1990 68,172 318.50 19.37% 1,326 80.63% 1,644.50 1991 69,700 333.30 18.74% 1,445 81.26% 1,778.30 1992 71,094 341.80 18.71% 1 ,485 81.29% 1,826.80 1993 72,516 354.68 18.90% 1.522 81.10% 1.876.68 Staffing Ir crease 81.93 22.51% 282 77.49% 363.93 General General Gov't Government w/o Police Schools Total Year Pl j)pulation /1000 Pop. /1000 Pop. /1000 Pop. /1000 Pop. 1988 63,200 4.32 3.41 19.62 23.94 1989 66,120 4.57 3.52 19.51 24.08 1990 68,172 4.67 3.54 19.45 24.12 1991 69,700 4.78 3.62 20.73 25.51 1992 71,094 4.81 3.57 20.89 25.70 1993 72,516 4.89 3.58 20.99 25.88 Staffing Irl crease 0.58 0.17 1.37 1.94 Exhibit 1 A. Cii ..... 0) - 0) 0 ..... .... C) j IIi c IE 't"'" CU ... ... :c tJJ c;; .c ... >< 0 W I- 0 0) 0) III ..... (5 0 .c: (,) en f - c: Q) E 0) E CO 0) Q) ..... > 0 C> ~ Q) c: Q) C> t CO CO 0) ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO .. N 0 CO CO .. N ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... CI) u "~ c 0 i CI) =: en .E - '15 ,Q ~ CI) 0 . - ~ .c 0 ~ .c 0 - "i '15 ~ ~ 0 .! D U) 8 c f 02: CD ~ (/) - '15 0 ~ 0 0 .c . u en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oj . ~ . '" '" ~ SJVUO(] co III =a:l!l l::Sl~l2::;18:e~l;(lCii~:BSl. ~8 ;:!~:2~8;;;:;;U;:8:3~li:B~ tii:iil .-..................NNNNNNNNNN ll.~ CIl " ...~....a;~..,~~"'~~ll)8e co ~[j;_~_Ill.~~ _~~.C5_ _81_~ . u iii III .~ 5..m "''''m:alJl~'''''''''~~s~'''' 08 l2.l8. _~~0l.~~1::.81_~_ .<'!.~ CIl Q)~~::~~:!~~~~~~~ U) Sl Ol - ~ .c :is CIl ~ "'ll)"'lJI21ll)~~~lJI~~~8 :to Q - " ~~~~~aN~~~~Si_~_ _ _ ........ i- - co:: l:l~81""~:ll~~~""""8~;! ::J ~-g co8...~..,~ co 8llB.........., '15 0 o)~~ ~~!f~~~~ ~ ~ ~ Pi~ I .c >< - w 'i .c i! ~ ~~ '#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#. 0:: oS! ~n~~~;1i~~~~~;:!!aaa S! oil:: CD ell O..............-O......NN...MNNNN " C .., III l! ci. ~-~-~~.~-~~~ ~ ~~.~-~-~. ~ I- 0 8 "0 11. 18[j;:8~~lZlu;l2:B:8m~~l:? '" 0 tri i~~~~liil~~i8!~~ .... .c ~ 0 u ~ U) .................................................................................. . 1>66 ~ e66~ ~~ ~66~ 066~ 686~ 896~ .. " QI >- L86~ 986~ S86~ l>86 ~ es6~ Z;86~ ~86~ ~ ~ oj " <C N ~ ,Q "- .c >< W ....,. m m ..- ('t) m m ..- C\I 8 m m .~ ..- CD 'Q)(I) 0)15 ..- "0 CD 0) ffio 0) ..- -.... o :::l 00 .s= .s= O:!: 0 (I)~ 0) t 0) ..- .c Q, t! 0) C) 00 0) C .s= ..- iii .... 0 Q. .~ en 0 ... "C .... ~ 00 C'G -> ~ 8 Q, 0 00 C> ca.- 0) E ... ~ ..- E I-CD .. 0 (5(1) l'IS 0 CD ~15 ~ m c: "- CD OCD ...... N .! C> (1)0 00 ~ 0) en t t ..- .c c t! .c >< I- W 0 <0 00 0) 0 8 ..- .c "0 C.) c: ... .~ C/) :::l u.. CD CD E -(I) 'i) ~15 00 CD 0) c: ECD ..- CD 1-0 C> -.... o :::l tV o 0 .... .s= .s= ....,. 0 O:!: 00 I- (I)~ 0) ..- t t ('t) 00 0) ..- C\I 00 0) ..- 00 0) ..- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ci ci ci ci ci 0 ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ...... <0 'i) ....,. ('t) C\I ..- SJelloa - CD CD .c rn "C cu f Q, CJ) c o := cu E 10.. .e c 10.. .e rn c e .- o o .c o CJ) ~ '" ~ ~I~ ~I~ s,l SI ~ 1il ~ ~ ~ N ai "'I'" !!ll~ .., I~_ ~Ii ~!~ ~ ~ ~ i IS; 0;, > " lJ.. " 0; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g i r- '" ~ on '" ~ r- ~ ~ N ~ N ~ N '" ~ ~ ~ li5liii ~ ~ oo!ri '''' SZ!1r- ~i~ ~~ i ~~f ~ I ~f I l!!1:2 ~I~ ...1", ~II '" '9 ~ it ~ ,I " I ~ '" '9 '" co ~ 19 ;0 it ~ "'- ~- :: ~ ...1'" f:lo~ - 1"'_ ~ I!;!. '" ~ I- Z W S 8 ::::l 15 ID ~ 8 Z J: ~8 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ g r- ltl en ~ on ... 0; ~ 18. :;: CD r- '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ :li ~ :li ~ ~ ~ a :;j ~ :;j ;1. C;; lri '" ~ N '" ~ :;j ~ r- ~ ;1. :g N '" ~ :;j ~ g ~ :;j ;1. ~ ~ w 8 :> ID -' 8 J: ~~ I-~ Ol- I-O u..1- ou.. wO ~;1. I-~ ffi~ ~g ~-' ;1. :2 :q ;1. l8 :q ;1. ~ :q ~ co ::i ;1. ~ :Ii ~ ...: '" ~ .,; ~ .,; ~ .,; ;1. l8 N '" ~ N '" ;1. ~ C;; ~ r- M '" ;1. ;g g I- W 8 ::::l ~ID I-~ Ol- I-o u..1- Ou.. wO ~;1. I-(/) Z<( ~~ ffig 0......1 <Xi(/) ~~ ZI- o~ Ow ~o.. g~ ....I~ u..w Oz Ww (:l(:l ;5u.. zO W;1. ~<( ~~ ~ ~ ;1. ... .... ~ ~ aD :!: ~ ~ ~ :li , ~ ;1. r- N ~ ~ ~ ; g 1/1. CD o :!: ~ ~ ~ M :!: ~ M :!: ~ '" g ~ :;: ;1. ~ :;: ;1. co r- o ... ~ r- '" ~ m ;1. ~ o ... ~ ...: '" ~ ...: '" f- a lli 1/1. r- '" :Ii 1/1. '" ... ...: '" 1/1. ~ :Ii 1/1. ~ lli ~ :Ii I- ID ~ + I- ~w g@ -'ID u..-' 0;5 Wo ~I- ~~ W1/l. ~<( W(/) 0..<( ~ '" ~ ~ ~ "fi ("j ;1. 8 o r- ~ ~ g cO ~ m ~I! I I ~ ~ r- aD ~ oj r- ~ ~ aD f. CD ai ;:: ~ oj r- f- '" ~ ~ ~ 1/1. ~ ~ ~ N 1/1. ::l oj ~ :li 1/1. ~ ai 1/1. l!? aD ~ ...: ~ I ~I! I i ~I~ ~ I ~ ! i I o N ~ .c .c >< W 1/1. r- a ~ ~ r- ~ ~ ...: it; ...., ~ ~ ;1. '" a lri ~ ~ ~ ~ 1/1. C'; N 1/1. r- '" aD 1/1. ;:1; ...: '" ~I~ 010 I (/) I-Z IDO w- c~ +w ~o.. g~ -'~ u..w Oz Ww ~(:l I-u.. zO W1/l. ~<( ~~ ~ >z !5S ~::::l o..ID ::EO: 01- ~z u..0 wU (:l~ ~g 0-' I- W 8 ::::l <0 8 J: ~ ~ o I- ..... 0) 0) ..... 0 0) 0) ..... 0) CO 0) ..... Q) Q) - - ca CO c:: n::: >< )( CO CO CO ca ..... 0) l- t ..... "C C ca Q) ,.... ~ <i. ::s CO l'lS ca 0) ~ 'lit Q) ..... > :J - (ij :c - > c :c Q) - c: CO >< E Q) E CO W tn 0) tn ~ ..... Q) Q) tn ~ tn <( <C (ij 1,1) - CO 0 0) ..... f ~ CO 0) ..... (W) CO 0) ~ ..... 1,1) C'! ..... SJBIIOa U! 9JBH XB.1. 1,1) I'-: o 1,1) o 1,1) C'! o ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,1) 0 1,1) 0 1,1) 0 1,1) 0 . . M (W) N N ..... ..... SJBIIOa o N 0) 0) ..... N CO 0) - ~ '#. '#. '#. ~ 'f!1. 'f!1. ~ CI) ~ '#. '#. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?fl.'#. ~ '#. '#. '#. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II) CO ..- 10 ..... <0 (J) 0 N M 0 10 ..- ~ ..... (J) M 0 (J) M ..- .... .... ~ 0 ~ ~ ..- ~I"-: (J) ..- I"-: "! ~ "!"! CO 10 M 10 CO 10 <0 M .... CQ CO CG ~ .....: ..n .....: u;) a) ..n c:i cO ci cci e ..- M ..- ..- ..- CO ..- ..... N ..... (J) <0 E ~ CO 10 O~ ..- 0 0 CO CO 10 ..... (J) CO (J) 10 (J) ..... M 0 en 10 CO U M ..- M NN ..... <0 ..... (J) ..... <0 ..- N CO 0 N <0 10 N CI) I .5 ..... N ..... ..... > <( c o ~ ns E ... -2 c ... c CI) ~ ; II) II) <( ...., c Q) E tJ) tJ) Q) tJ) ~ Q) > ~ f! ns c. E o o ... c CI) ~ ; II) II) <( ONOOO MCOOMO CONNNM ccicciN"":a:i .....~~IO<O M~~NCO r--:o;ccia:i-.i <0..-..... 0 (J) OMMNN (t')o;Na:ia:i ..... ..- ..... 1010000 ..........~<OO M(J)(J)O~ (t')o;o;-.ir--: IO<O<OM<O ~<O..-<OO LO(t')LO(t')(t') <OCONNIO ION..........M cci(t')NNLO ..... c o ~ .!! :J Q" o a. ~"-<O~<O CO CO CO..... M IOCO<ON(J) a:ir--:LOo;ci ..-.......-0..... CONNN..- ~ C :J o U 'tJ CI) ... U ~ CI) en E "~ :g = Q) 3:tt:c::: o 0 ~ .g 8 ~ "5 .... c: c: Q) .!: "co Q) 'C: ~ "t:: LLIQ.U<( ..-00010 ~ooo <0 .....MNO ..... -.iLO-.ici..- CO<O<OM 0 ~IO~~ o. N"":LOo;<o ~ ~.....~ N <O~IO..... ~ NN"":"":M ..... 0000 <0 .....~M<ON COCOMO~ -.i ....: 0; ~- cci ~..-CONM OION<O ..... (t') -.i ....: LO LO N<OIOO ..... M............... "!. ..... ..... N(J)MIO N M N..... 10 ..... M ..- (J) <0 ..- 0; cci (t') LO a:i ..... co..... 10 <0 ~CU Q)"- Q) Q) E c::: "t:: ~Socucu o 0 O)~ E c:::-c- >. cu:::Jg~~ ~.3~c::~ 00000 00<000 N(J)~NIO r--:r--:cci-.icci CO<OCO~1O .....~NMO LO"":(t')a:ici MN..........<O N~(J)O..... "":N"":(t')"": OOOO(J) NO"'" <0 M CONIOCOM "":ccia:iLOLO MIOMCO(J) 100~..-..... ci....:r--:cicci .....~(J)(J)(J) "'":,(J).....CO ..... N<O N <0..... ~OCOM..... (J)M~N<O cci(t')r--:....:-.i 10<010<010 E CU ....~ Q) 0) 'E CU ~~~O~ c:::c: U1ij 0) Q)CUO_:::J IID::W<( OOOO~ 10..... (J)N CO <0..... lOCO (J) cio;-.i(t')cci MCO~CO"'" M COM"'" 10 "":a:ir--:LO"": <0 10 CO..-N O_"'":,(J) (J)_CO .......... M .....01000 .....IO.....~N MCO<O<O..... o;cir--:(t')o; ..........COCO..- .....<O.....<OM (t')a:ia:iccia:i .....MCO<O~ <0 ..... ..... 0..... N..... M <OCO.....~..... (J) CO 10..... 10 LOLOr--:a:io; ~~~~M c: o O~ Q; Q) c::: .0 .- -;;c a.:::J ~CI)Eg~ ~~~~~ o U 'tJ CI) ... ICI) g Gi E en CI) ~ ~ .f CQ .... en at N .... N ~ o to ~ CO) .... M o ~ .... .... .... N ~ .... ~ at c .... cD CO) c N en en CO) to N CO) at .... CQ .... ~ 00 to N .... .... CO) ~ .... ~ o u CG '2 .~ :> ~ o LL ~I ~ co ~I ! ..... ai "'l:t ... :c :c >< w o :0::: CG D:: .. c: Q) E U) U) Q) U) U) oct Q) 01 l! Q) ~ U) -Q) ;: CG E Q) .c C( '" ,g ii fI) l;:; .5 e '8 :J ~ :: 'C . C CD .c C. ~ >< W C> ~ '8 ~ C 0 :J 0 0 0 8 - '2: C'G Q) - (I) 0 '8 I- ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 g- g- o g g ~ ..... ... SJIIIIO(] l'II l!! ~4! ~~~q~~~~~~~~~~ lJ8 .....::J:n!~~~~N::.~;!~~ il6 :gU')lt) U') t--r--t--t--",...,... D..~ 'E ~!~~N"'::3iB"'~~;1i;1i~ l'II "!. _..._",_lll.:ll_,": _a......_ _........"!. 1ii l!! ~~Oll!!!.....CJiN~N::.m~...~ '" l'II 8= !4l..,l6.....l6 .....<0... lie ~8 ~~~~:!i~~!t!i~;tgli:8 0> ... ~ ~ NeN..,ml6.....NCIO~~CD.....~ :c CONN'r' ""'('t)N ....... "" - " N..U'l..CC!."'"':"":."'"':an..CD....... .. ..Ul..C"tN.. is. ca= ~~ii~~ ~.~_~~ S:~.E.~.~_ ell ~-g '8 - M::J:1ll:1ll~:ll;1i:a18;:!:~:.:lCiilil 1 CII w 01 i!! 'a .c ************** I;:: = ~~ a~~~~~~~&!~~aaa ,g aI oil:: Q) ~ O~""""O"""NN...('t)NNNN " -c ell C ~~~~~~-~_~.~~~~~l ~ ::::I ci. 0 0 8 0 D.. lR:nlRmml6u;:al818m;:::~~ N i;j ~~~~~~~~~~~g8l8i :e - l;; e 0 Q) ....,..............................T'"............~............. llf I- >- t>66 ~ E66~ ~~ ~66~ 066~ 686~ 886~ .. .. .. >- L86~ 996~ Sll6 ~ 1>96 ~ E96~ Z86~ ~86~ ~ ~ ~ <i. It) - :c .c >< W t>6EH €66~ ~~ c ~66~ .S! ii ~ 066~ '0 en ~ e :;, . 696~ :!:: "C .c C ~ 996~ CD C) .. C. '0 :I >< ~ > W L96~ "0 0 0 8 996~ .c CJ .~ tn Gl (f) '0 S96~ ~ U . Hl6~ €96~ Z96~ ~96~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ili g Ili g Ili ~ llf ~ Ili ci CD It) " N N SJIlIIOCl to !!! =a~ ~~:e~:;8~~8l:;l8ll!l:8~ Gl c'J8 ...:~~u)g";u)~u)"':!li"':"':..; CJ 5lil l:; ~M!q!~ ~~,,~~~ .~ a.~ 'E ~~l!l:e~:8!"":sl~"'Sl~~ Gl to "!. ....."_ ."': .~It).It).lil.,,_,,". . en us!!! - C to i:sl~~:8~~~~~I!!~~S! .Q 8= ....N N'" 'I"""' "'('\10)0 Gl lil8 ~ ~ ~;::j. ~l!f ~ ~ f;f::f ~::f ~ llf c 0> 01 ~ - ... ::I ~ 0I~N:8"""'CD"',,"0I8"'OOl :l5 0 :t:: .c CD ~I'~st:nm~~ ~~~ 1i _ ::l i&f~~g~g"':aili~~~~ II> ;I:: ca:t:: ~ ~-g _'I;.~ _......._N_~~"!. _,,"_N.". '0 III >< ~~~:Q~~:sl.~~~~mco l 2! w ::I .c i!! ;I:: ~ .. #-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#- "" 'tJ ii a~l;;ll!;1i~~~~~;;!jaaa .9 ..a: Gl c C) O.............O..-NN...('l')NNNN ::l Gl "t:I Q. II> >< ci ~~-~~.~~~.~. ~_ ~.~.~_~ l ~ w 0 8 '0 a. :8:;;18mmlilu;&l:g:8111;::~~ N 0 Ili "" .c ~ lifi!i!sil~;iiiilR~~ 0 CJ ~ en ....---............-....-.................. . m II) :!:: .c .- .c >< W U) c 0 c 'i 0 ~ ;: '8 t! ~ CD ~ . 0 - 1 c CD E Cl '8 C S ~ CD 0 > 0 0 C) III G> ... t! .~ G> II) CD '8 C ~ CD C) . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g g g g g iii M .... ai r-: iii M N N N .... .... .... .... SJellOCl :ll!~ O!<<i~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0.= ~8 N........N~..,~~l8mmN....CIO ~~ ~~~~'I"""~'I""".....'I"""..........~~~ &..... CIl 1: ....1tl........g~(2;ItlN~......,Ul8 c J!I ~~~8.~.T""......_~_$.C'!~~~ _ 0 III f! ~Q)....N~Q)Q);8i....O..,....~ ~ 50!! ro~~ ~~ ~~~:!N 0- L! ~8 ,..:....:....:....: as ai a) o. ci ~..: N ri M Gl ......,................-..... ..... c. 0 ~~ ..............,....~Itl....Q)mQ)........~ - re~~~~ S~~ ~CD~CD c ~~ ~Ml~r-:~N~~~r-:~;t~ Gl E ~ ...mo~ ..,lRNN.... G> r-:<<i<<iaiONN-.illir-:<<iONM c io _....,.............--NNN ~ Gl Cl > t~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 (!) 8::::~m;J;~~leli:l~;:'!;888 ~ ,,0:: O....:....:.....:d....:NN~(")NNNN Gl ~-~-~~~~~~-~~~_~_~I- c ci. Gl 0 (!) D.. :Rto~lRlRg('ii12l818m;::~~ Ci iv ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - 0 G> I- >- ..6EH €6EH Z66~ ~66~ 066~ 69EH gge~ ~ :l >- L96~ 99EH S96~ lr96 ~ €96~ Z96~ ~96~ ~ ~ ~ g g g .... ai r-: .... . o II) - :c .- .c >C W ~ J! ca U) ,~ .c ::s c [l. 0 'i - S ::s 0 'is .c ~ - 'i . U) .l:: C l 0 .. 0 e '0 CD ~ C. 0 0 - ~ c CD .~ II E en '0 C ! L- CD () > . 0 (!) e CD c CD (!) ~ g ,.: t>66 ~ t66~ 166~ ~66~ 066~ 696~ WEH .. .. II > L96~ 996~ S96~ 1>96 ~ t96~ Z96~ ~96~ ~ g on , C II) ~ .c ,- .c >< w ~ ~- on ~ ~ g M ~ ~ ~ ~ g oj ~ g ,.: ~ ~ SJIlIIO(J ~ ~ d8 ~s~~~~~~~~~~~~ 9 1!~~~~~EE~~~~a ~~ III C o ~ l! Gl Co o - C Gl E C >- .. - Gl Gl ~'ti e"en CJ ~2i Gl = CQ", Gl_ e" = Ci,g '0= .... ~ 'E os 'lilt! c os 8= m8 M:8OllQU>N.........ll!8NIDCCl ~.-8(;S&;~:;;Si~m_~~~ r::2iSli~;i,.:~..:x;f!2pf~~ U>liSUS...N;:Ii~:alS~j;SIDN~ 1Ii"';"';.,;tDcD"":"":<<i<<i<<i<<imm lil3:!2!5!~"'fil!ll:;~21"'!!I!~ "'cOClSii'lo:a...CiS...~CiS31us~ "':"":"":NmoOcn';ci....:rt'iMm!i :;;~~S;~u;!;:~~~~~~o ";cD<<iu;"':<<io)g~~~'t~~ lJ! ~~ 0,2 c:g ~Q. .l:: l~ Oil: ;f.;f.;f.;f.;f.;f.;f.;f.;f.;f.;f.;f.;f.;f. 8::::::lil~~~:e&lS!~888 ci~~"':ci"':NN"(,,)NNNN ci &. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :8:tir8~~g;ilit~mi~~ ~ !!~~~~!~~~~~~~ ~ ~ t'> ~ 33 15 .c t!l ~ I I C) I 41 I III ~ C ~ 41 ~ t'> 41 "0 D. c ::J LL c: Q) t'> \ \ \ \ " " " " > / / / I , , , , , , , , '" " " " 'iJ!. 8 ~ '" 'iJ!. 8 8 '" ~ ~~\O\O-NOOO\lr\lr\r--r---Nl"'ll"'l ......~OONr--Nlr\OOO\OO-r--\Ol"'ll"'l\O E-<~""';oO<"ir...:r...:\ClNo\oOo\O\Cl"';\Cl a:l l"'l'<l"NoO\r--r--r--\OooIlr\\ON ,., U N N N N - l"'l l"'l lr\ lr\ lr\ '<I" l"'l l"'l Ci ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ Ci ~ ~~ a:l[:l E-< ~ ~~~~~~~r::;g8~l;;;~R '<1"" <':, "'., l"'l" 1'" q C"1 <':, l"'l" '<1"" 1'" <':, 0" -" ~r::~~~~[Q~~~~$~~ r--r--'<I"r--'<I"'<I"l"'lNNlr\'<tNO\lr\ l"'l" '<1"" l"'l" N" N '<1"" lr\" 0 0" vi' N" '<1"" r-: lr\" ;;;;;;;;;;~~~~~~~~~ 5 ~ ~ 00000000000000 ~~?:l~?:lg;g~~?:l::ES::E~ ~ 0\" 0 -" ~ lr\" 00" ~ 0" 1'" ~ .,.," \0" 00 lr\ lr\ \0 \0 \0\0 \0 \0 1'1'1'1'1'1' ~ ~ ~ l;;; gg ~ ~ ;;:: ~u;~ ;;\ ~ ~ l; ~ ............................................................................................-...................... ~~~l;;;gg~~;;::~~;;\~~l; , , , , , , , "- , , , , , , , , '- '- '- '- '- '- '-. '-. '-. '-. '-. '-. 'iJ!. 8 ~ 'iJ!. 8 ~ 'iJ!. 8 ~ 8! .... ~ ~ ~ ~ 8l ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I \ \ m <i. ..... .. :c .c >< W .... ~ gj 10 ~ 'iJ!. 8 o F XED PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - MIDDLE SCHOOL Ie an amount 8,079,000 ir terest rate 7.00% tE rm 20 p~yment amount 762,600 'YEARLY PAYMENTS Y9ar principal interest balance non-amortization - ------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 1 403,950 565,530 7,675,050 969,480 2 403,950 537,254 7,271,100 941 ,204 3 403,950 508,977 6,867,150 912,927 4 403,950 480,701 6,463,200 884,651 5 403,950 452,424 6,059,250 856,374 6 403,950 424,148 5,655,300 828,098 7 403,950 395,871 5,251,350 799,821 8 403,950 367,595 4,847,400 771,545 9 403,950 339,318 4,443,450 743,268 10 403,950 311,042 4,039,500 714,992 11 403,950 282,765 3,635,550 686,715 12 403,950 254,489 3,231,600 658,439 13 403,950 226,212 2,827,650 630,162 14 403,950 197,936 2,423,700 601,886 15 403,950 169,659 2,019,750 573,609 16 403,950 141,383 1,615,800 545,333 17 403,950 113,106 1 ,211,850 517,056 18 403,950 84,830 807,900 488,780 19 403,950 56,553 403,950 460,503 20 403,950 28,277 0 432,227 8,079,000 5,938,065 te tal debt $14,017,065 T ~e first year payment on a fall VPSA bond issue is half of the interest. T ~e second year is the full principal and interest. Exhib it 7B Jefferson-Madison Regional Library 201 East Market Street · Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 · (804) 979-7151 · FAX (804) 971-7035 Office of the Director March 19, 1993 . Robert Tucker lbemarle County Executive lbemarle County Office Bldg. 4 1 McIntire Road harlottesville, V A 22902-4596 The Board of Trustees of the Jefferson-Madison Regional Library requests the use $21.070 in carryover funds accumulated from our two prior IlScal years (1990-1992). is $21.070 is in excess of the allowable limits in our Regional Agreement. The Board of rustees delayed making this request from Albemarle County as the status of State Aid f nding was uncertain until the close of the 1993 Legislative session and the annual budget rocess. In developing this request, the Albemarle Trustees felt the pressures on the County udget were great this year and proposed the carryover be utilized to pay for the additional hours proposed in the regular operating budget for Scottsville and Crozet, totaling 9 370. These are extra base hours and substitute hours for the 3rd part-time staff member t Crozet and Scottsville. These hours are essential as there are no longer substitutes from lsewhere in the system for vacations, training and emergencies. The impact on the perating budgets of these two branches should be delayed as there are one-time projects - ainting and repairs in this year's operating request. In addition, the remainder of the funds - $11,700 - is requested to partially offset ome of the $18,000 in the CIP for furnishing the back room of Northside. Ser.-ing Charlottes\"ille, Albemarle County, Greene County, Louisa County, and \elson County #' -2- Additional staff hours for Crozet and Scottsville Offset of $18,000 CIP request for the back room at Northside Total $ 9,370 $11.700 $21,070 Please let us know if you have additional questions or concerns. c : Christine Baker - Albemarle Library Trustee Cyndy Caughron - Albemarle Library Trustee Shirley Dorrier - Albemarle Library Trustee Sincerely, ~~ Donna M. Selle Director b: Gary O'Connell - President, Library Board of Trustees . Literacy Volunteers of America Charlottesville/ Albemarle P.O. Box 1156 Charlottesville, V A 22902 804/977 -3838 UUARTERL Y REPORT 51..19tARY OF ACHIEVEPENTS FOR LVA-;:J'A STUDENTS OCTOBER - DECE:I1BER 1992 Based upon 66 tutors reporting 975 hours of tutoring 302 hour of preparation 55 ~_~l.~JL~Y_nrrOO_g~aI!~ I IN READI~_~.H~ . of Students Reading Speed 2 Reading Co-.prehension 7 Read ing Anything! 2 Reading ~re Difficult Katerial 12 Sight Vocabulary B Phonics 5 Pronunciation 3 Overall I..,rov~t It SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS Learned 30-40 new words. 90 sight words mastered Learned the alphabet and some sounds Good progrees in word patterns, phonics, and sight words Has memorized large bank of sight words Completed half of the Basic Survival Skills List Has mastered all letter sounds Uses phonics to decode multi-syllabic words Great improvement with short vowel sounds Improved word attack. Reading more smoothly. Progress to level #7. Reading complete short stories. Reading aloud better. Better understanding of what he is reading. Improved word recognition skills. Reads road signs, the horoscope in the newspaper, and seme words in the Bible. Reads the ~~~~t~qt~~_E~~t children's section. Reads more fluently with excellent comprehension. Reads work related material more easily. Continuous progress in all areas of reading I !~~L~!I!~~L~!Id:~.;. . OF STUDENTS Writing syntax Writing for pleasure eo.fortable with writing Spelling 7 3 2 2 S ECIFIC OBSERVATIONS: Has gained confidence in letter writing and written . communication. Able to read and write reports for work more easily. Learning to write words in cursive with great success. Writing more easily and quickly. 1.tl~B_.EBQ~E~g.~Llt1Ql~.eI~!! Making progress toward the GED. Learned the alphabet and some sounds. Good progress in math and grammar. !~~!~~ Grea~ly i~roved abili~y ~o concen~ra~e. llIIproved speech pa~"terns. S"tuden~ ~re relaxed Mi~h tu"tor. S~uden~ does all hOlleWOrk and is very IM)tiva~ed t-o learn. ttot-ivat-ed t-o at-"tend sessions regularly. Increased confidence in learning situation. Pleased t-o be able t-o do "things like signing a card and ot-her lit-~le everyday "things. Expresses ~re positive feelings Feels IM)re confident on "the iob. Q.IjEIJI.~I3._IJ!2~ Reading books about computers and writing about them. Using the computer at the library. !~L~~ Able "to wri~e names on laundry ~icke"ts for the first- "time. Has wri "tt-en some checks for the firs~ t-ime. A"t Christ-aas, MaS able t-o read a gift book ~o a child. Has gained enough confidence "to read aloud in church. Has become in~eres"ted and unders"tands current events. Watches a T.V. class on preparing for "the SED. A~t-ends st-uden~ support- group. At~ended a ceremony for Kar~in Lut-her King Mit-h 'tutor. REgistered and voted in the las~ elec:~ion. llIIprovement; in work relat;ed reading. Able to writ-e down words seen on t-he T.V. screen during the evening news. Finds it- easier to deal wit-h reading at; work. Wri'tes le'tt;ers on the typewri t;er. Co~let;ed reading two Bible stories. Able "to read ~Y_~!~~~Y~~_I~y~ t;o granddaughter. Dualified for a be~~er job as s~epping stone to long tera job goal. oil. -~ . (l\: Examples of Learner Goals For Tutor and Local Program Use (You may make copies as needed) 10 Community (1) . Apply for Citizenship · Participate in Neighborhood Watch . Reading for Community Activities · Read/Write For Newsletter . Reading for ReligiousActivities (Bible. Talmud,etc.) 11 Driver's License (2) . Apply for Driver's License . Receive License · Take Driver's Test 12 GED (3) · Complete GED . Register for GED classes 13 JoblBetter Job (4) . Read Classified Ads . Apply for Armed Services . Read Notes from Co-Workers · Read Work Related Materials · Read Manuals . Read Equipment Operating Instructions · Fill Out Application · Take Test for a Job · Write Notes to Co-Workers · Write Reports · Fill Out OrderslRequisitions 14 Survival Skills (5) . Read Menus · Read Recipes . Write Shopping Lists · Read Cooking DirectionsIFood Labels . Read NewspaperslMagazines · Read Bills . Write Checks · Balance Checkbook to Statement . OpenlUse Checking/Savings Accts. · Apply for Safety Deposit Box . Apply for Unemployment Insurance · Complete CrediVLoan Application . Read LeaselRental Agreement · Read Medication LabelsIPrescriptions . Read Labels in Drug Store · Apply for MedicarelMedicaidlHMO . Fill Out Insurance Forms · Read BuslAirfinefTrain Schedules . Read Travel GuideslMaps · Read Car Repair Invoices . Find Number/Addressllnfo in Phone BooklYellow Pages 15 Parenting Skills (6) · Read Notes from School · Read to Ghild · Readl'Nrite CardslLetters · Participate in Scouting Program · Write Notes to School · Help Child with Homework · Participate in PTAlPTO 16 Voting (7) · Register to Vote · Read Ballot and Vote 17 Entered Other EducationfTraining (8) · Entered Training Program · Enter Adult Basic Education (ABE) Program · Take Adult Basic Education (ABE) Classes · Apply for College 18 Library/Creative (9) · Apply for Library Card . Check Out Books · Use Reference Materials · Read in Library · Check Out AN Materials · Write Journal, Stories, Poems, Essays ... 19 Freedom from Public Assistance C LVA. 12/26190 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., of Supervisors . a ~ County Executiv~~ Albemarle County Board March 19, 1993 RE: status Report - Recyclinq proqram tached is a status report for the County's recycling program epared by Mr. Robert McKinley, Recycling Program Coordinator. r program is basically funded in the proposed FY 93-94 budget th the exception of Item 5.3 Licensing Requirements (see report). you know, we have been discussing with the haulers the velopment of a County Code amendment requiring licensing of ulers in order to standardize the service of recycling in bemarle County. In doing so, the haulers feel that if recycling going to be required to be provided by all of the haulers, then me type of subsidy for retro-fitting or purchasing proper uipment to handle the recycling effort in the County would be propriate. . Higgins has developed an attachment which outlines the various tions for providing a subsidy for the haulers. A copy of a draft unty Code amendment regarding the above mentioned licensing quirements is also attached and we will need you to adopt a solution of intent to amend the County Code and set a pUblic aring for April 14th. My suggestion is that we discuss this tter at your Monday, March 22nd worksession at the end of the y, prior to finalizing the various changes to the FY 93-94 budget d setting of any tax rates. Should you have any questions, ease do not hesitate to call me. T,Jr/dbm .051 tachment Ms. Jo Higgins Recycling Program status Report 1993 attachment A - Budget FY 93-94) commendation: Establish a separate drop-off center at Ivy for meowners. atus: Due to space limitations at Ivy and the added expenses at a separate drop-off container entail, it has been decided to low homeowners to use the existing containers at Ivy for our gged commingled system. This approach was supported by the cycling committee. For safety reasons, it is recommended that h meowners not be invited to participate in the program until the s'te modifications are complete. st: Container rental cost is included in bid prices for 5.1 xisting Program). commendation: Analyze program results before considering other ternatives (drop-off centers, mobile centers), or making cycling mandatory. atus: On going. st: $10,000 has been identified for FY 93-94 to provide alysis and additional investigation or studies that may be quested by the Board of Supervisors. 8 COMPOSTING commendation: Pursue composting site at Ivy. atus: RSWA has hired a consultant to make recommendations on llection and yard waste composting facility design. 9 BUSINESS RECYCLING commendation: Promote business recycling. atus: The business survey has been reviewed and a letter of sponse has been written. Mailing will be complete by the end March. sts of those businesses who recycle cardboard and those who do t have been assembled. Many potential cardboard recyclers have en contacted and at least one firm has started recycling rdboard since being contacted. with a few exceptions, most of Recycling Program status Report 1993 major cardboard producers are already recycling. er 58 tons of cardboard were recycled in February by BFI Waste stems alone. Many businesses do not generate enough cardboard warrant their own cardboard dumpster. Convincing businesses share the cost of cardboard recycling may take time. number of private firms are beginning to expand their business cycling efforts and it is hoped that this will complement the If service provided by the McIntire Center. st: An option to subsidize the placement of centrally located rdboard dumpsters may be considered by the Board. Costs for an yard cardboard dumpster at five locations (Crozet, scottsville, N(2) and 250E} with twice a week collection would be under ,ODD/year. 6.0 REPORTING commendation: Develop methods of obtaining accurate recycling ights. atus: All haulers in the County will be required to obtain ight tickets to be in conformance with the proposed ordinance. are investigating the appropriate means of requiring waste nerators to report recycling weights. / tachment Jo Higgins Bob Brandenburger ATTACHMENT A BUDGET FY 93-94 R~commendation No. 5.1 Current Curbside Program w/o Newspaper (Processing) 5.2 Ivy site: Improvements (funded in 92' -93' ) Staff Monitoring Maintenance 5 .3 Licensing 5 .4 Promotion/Advertising 5.5 Newspaper 5 .6 Ivy Drop-off 5 .7 Analysis of Program 5.8 Composting 5 .9 Business- Cardboard 6.0 Reporting Total R~commended Budget Appropriation proiected Costs $98,500 $ 0 $13,200 $ 3,000 $17,200 $19,200 IncL in 5.1 $10,000 TBD - Under Study $ 7,000 minimal $168,100 ($165.980) ($2,120)* * This will be offset by carryforward from FY 92-93. I ATTACHMENT B 5.3 Licensing - Subsidy Options he costs associated with processing newspaper and commingled ecyclables, labor, maintenance, advertising and promotional xpenses can be considered an indirect support cost or 'subsidy" to the hauler. At projected recovery levels of 170 ons/month for 1993-1994 this indirect subsidy will be pproximately $151,000. n order to collect blue bag recyclables and newspaper a hauler ust either replace, modify or augment his existing trash ollection equipment. This can represent a significant up ront capital investment. These costs are fixed regardless of ow many households participate in the recycling program. Of he nine (9) programs that formed the basis for Andrea Trank's eport, three (3) provided direct subsidies to private haulers. here are at least three different methods by which the County ould directly subsidize the hauler recycling program: 1) A onthly subsidy paid to each hauler based on the total number f customers; 2) A monthly subsidy based on only those ouseholds participating in recycling; and 3) A subsidy based n the tonnage of recyclables collected by each hauler. For All Households nder this method, the hauler would receive a per household/mo. ubsidy based on the total number of customers regardless of ow many actually participate in the recycling program. aulers would be required to submit customer names, addresses nd telephone numbers for verification purposes. Advantages: a) No tracking of actual participation required. b) Haulers are not penalized for non-participating customers. Disadvantages: a) Requires obtaining customer lists generally guarded by haulers and extensive verification. It may prove difficult keeping track of customers served each month. There could be a great deal of switching from one hauler to another. b) There is less incentive for the hauler to promote recycling since the subsidy is the same whether households recycle or not. c) There would be no incentive to include trash in with recyclables. tachment B - Subsidy options rch 19, 1993 ge 2 f this type of direct subsidy was based upon $2.00 per ouseholdfmo., the program would cost an additional 384,000fyr. based on the estimated 16,000 households served by aulers. (See attached exhibit). Households scenario, the hauler would receive a per householdfmo. ubsidy for only those households which set out recyclables for ollection at least once during the month. Rather than rely on auler verification of the actual number of households setting ut recyclables, a formula could be developed based on a ational average waste generation per household and actual auler weight tickets to determine an estimated number of ustomers for each hauler. For the first year, a set articipation rate would be assumed. The number of articipating households for each hauler would be determined by ultiplying the estimated customers by the assumed articipation rate. This would then be multiplied by the ubsidy per household to determine each hauler's monthly ubsidy. Actual recycling weights could be used to calibrate he formula for following years. Advantages: a) It is to the hauler's advantage to promote recycling and increase participation. b) No lists of customer names or numbers would be required therefore, verification not required. c) There would be no incentive to include trash in with recyclables. Disadvantages: a) The same participation rates are assumed for all haulers. ased on a 75% monthly participation and a subsidy of $2.00 per ouseholdfmo. this option would cost approximately $288,000. See attached exhibit). er Ton Subsid nder this option, the hauler would be subsidized based on the ctual tonnage of recyclable material collected. Advantages: a) Payment is based upon the real program goal, the amount of material being diverted from the landfill. ttachment B - Subsidy Options arch 19, 1993 age 3 It is to the hauler's advantage to promote recycling and increase participation. b) Since haulers will be required to obtain scale weights anyway, this would not be an added burden. Therefore, it is the easiest to administer with no customer lists required. Disadvantages: a) This type of subsidy might favor those haulers working the urban ring where more recyclable material is believed to be generated. b) It is possible that haulers might include trash in with recyclables in order to increase recycling weights. The proposed part time staffing of the center should reduce this possibility. t a subsidy of $100/ton this option would cost an additional 192,000. (See attached eXhibit). rams f the three (3) programs which provided direct subsidies, one rovided a subsidy of $1.50/mo. for only those households which articipated in the recycling program. This subsidy remained onstant for three years and then was eliminated. Another, rovided a $2.50/mo. subsidy in the first year for all ouseholds regardless of whether they participated or not. his subsidy dropped to $1.50 in the second year and then was liminated. In the third program, each of five haulers was nder contract with the county to provide recycling service for specific number of households. A subsidy pool was stablished with each hauler drawing from the pool based on ctual participation. n four (4) of the nine programs, marketing of recyclable aterials was provided for by the municipality. Only one of he programs accepted commingled materials. Under Albemarle ounty's proposed ordinance, the County would provide for the rocessing and marketing of newspaper and commingled materials. o a certain extent, tip fee avoidance at $40/ton, may also be onsidered a subsidy. SUBSIDY OPTIONS All Participating Per Households* Households** Ton ------------------------------------- Part "cipation t Subsidy holds 16000 100% 75% $2.00 $2.00 $100 Cost/mo. $32,000 $384,000 $24,000 $288,000 $16,000 $192,000 Tota Cost/yr. Indi ect Subsidy*** -------- Tons 170 170 170 Proc ssing Co t/ton $57.70 Proc ssing Co t/mo. $9,809 $9,809 $9,809 Proc ssing Co t/yr. $117,708 $117,708 $117,708 Advt Promo. $17,200 $17,200 $17,200 Labo /Maintenance $16,200 $16,200 $16,200 ------------------------------------- Tota Cost/yr. $151,108 $151,108 $151,108 During the 2nd half 1992 Charlottesville's curbside program averaged 26 lbs./HH/mo. for all 12,800 HH served. Recovery rates for the County are projected to be 20 lbs. household/mo. due to its more rural nature. * Subsidy paid for all 16,000 households served by haulers. ** Subsidy paid for only those HH which participate at least once per month. Participation estimated at 75%. *** This is included in recommended FY 93-94 Budget. **** Tonnage based on 16,000 HH served by haulers and 1,000 HH carrying their own trash to Ivy. Tonnage includes newspap and commingled. Attachment C RECYCLING ORDINANCE SUMMARY ere are four major elements in the Draft Recycling Ordinance: Article III. Sec.16-14 requires the reporting of recycling data by haulers. Subsection (b), which may be adopted at the Board's option, requires businesses to report recycling weights. T ose businesses, including haulers, who exclusively use one of t e County authorized collection centers, permitted haulers, or ndors known to the County (Coiners or Bryant Salvage) are not quired to report. The intent is to capture recycling weights om those companies which are either back shipping recyclable terials to their home offices or are using a vendor or refuse uler that we would not normally receive information from. Only relative few businesses would fall under subsection (b). Since eir input has not yet been solicited, the Board may consider ding subsection (b) at a later date. Article III. Sec.16-15 requires all trash haulers doing siness in Albemarle County to collected newspaper, glass ttles and jars, metal cans and plastic soda, milk and water ttles from their residential customers. While it is not ndatory for a homeowner to recycle, it is mandatory that a uler pick up recyclables that his customer sets out for llection. The County provides for the processing of newspaper d commingled recyclables. is section also requires trash haulers to offer recycling rvices to apartment complexes where they provide trash service. e key word is offer. The hauler does not have to provide a cycling service unless the apartment management accepts the fer. Article III. Sec.16-16 specifies that trash haulers must ovide weekly, or at a minimum bi-weekly, recycling service for sidential customers on the same day trash is collected. The rpose is to require a consistent level of service. Studies dicate that providing recycling service on a different day than ash service confuses many homeowners, leading to drastically wer participation rates. Division 2 requires that all trash haulers must apply for d be issued a Permit by the County in order to engage in trash llecting within the County. The application must specify a cycling plan in accordance with the ordinance. If a hauler es not plan to participate in the County bagged commingled ogram then he must give us details on a satisfactory ternative program. COMMENDATION: The Board adopt a resolution of intent to amend apter 16 of the County Code to include these recycling ovisions. / 3/16/93 DRAFT RECYCLING ORDINANCE ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL (to replace existing Article I) Sec.16-1. Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and p~rases shall have meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section: Garbage. All offal and refuse animal and vegetable matter. Garbage or trash collectors. All persons engaged in the b~siness of picking up garbage and trash of any description by t~uck or other vehicle for the delivery to a sanitary landfill a~ea or other place, for disposal of the same as may be permitted b~ law. Generators means any entity whose act or process produces splid waste. Multi-family dwelling means a building or portion thereof cpntaining more than two (2) dwelling units and not classified as a one family or two family dwelling nor as a townhouse, with not mpre than one family occupying each dwelling unit. Nonresidential units means businesses, both retail and w~olesale, including apartments with more than two dwelling u~its. Person means any natural person, corporation, partnership, a~sociation, firm, receiver, guardian, trustee, executor, a~ministrator, fiduciary, or representative or group of i~dividuals or entities of any kind. processing means the separation and marketing of recyclable materials. Recyclable materials means materials which have been source s~parated by any person or materials separated from solid waste fpr the subsequent utilization in both cases as raw material to b~ manufactured into a new product other than fuel or energy. Recycling means the process of separating a given waste m~terial from the waste stream and processing it so that it is u~ed again as a raw material for a product, which mayor may not bl~ similar to the original product. Refuse means all solid and semiliquid wastes of a community, i~cluding litter, garbage, ashes, rubbish, street cleanings and s(~lid market and industrial wastes, but not including human or a(ricultural animal body wastes. Solid waste, pursuant to Code of Virginia, section 10.1-1400 seq. "The Virginia Waste Management Act", means any garbage, r fuse, sludge or other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semiliquid or combined gaseous material, resulting from i dustrial, commercial, mining and agricultural operations, or c mmunity activities, but does not include (i) solid or dissolved m terial in domestic sewage, (ii) solid or dissolved material in i rigation return flows or in industrial discharges which are s urces subject to a permit from the state water control board, o (iii) source, special nuclear, or byproduct material as d fined by the Federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Refuse remover means any person engaged in removing or ransporting refuse for compensation from two (2) or more esidential, commercial or industrial establishments, either ithin or without the county. Residential units means any housing unit within the county including single-family dwellings, two-family dwellings, townhouses and mobile homes. It does not include mUlti-family ellings. Occupants of such residential units are referred to as residents. Source separation means the separation of recyclable terial from other refuse by a generator or source site. Trash. All rubbish, cans, bottles, containers, refuse, per, cardboard or any other like waste or discarded materials an inorganic nature. ARTICLE III. RECYCLING (New Article) S c.16-13. Purpose. The intent of this article is to encourage and promote r cycling throughout the County in order to protect limited n tural resources for the benefit of its citizens. S Nonresidential and refuse removal reporting. (a) All persons involved in the collection, transportation o processing of recyclable materials generated within the County a annual report of their recycling activity to the County's D partment of Engineering by March 1 for the previous calendar y are (b) Any generator who separates recyclable material for c llection by a refuse remover not permitted by the County or r cycling vendor not known to the County, shall submit an annual r port of their recycling activity to the County's Department of E gineering by March 1 for the previous calendar year. (c) Annual reports required to be submitted hereunder shall b certified by a responsible official of the generator or refuse r mover and shall contain: (1) the name and address of the eporting party; (2) the total quantity (by weight) of solid aste recycled by the reporting party during the reporting eriod; (3) the names and addresses of the recycling vendors who eceived the recycled waste; and/or (4) other information oncerning waste generation, waste management and recycling equested by the Department of Engineering. Annual reports may e waved for those refuse removers that exclusively use County uthorized collection centers or listed vendors. (For state a thority see VA Code 15.1-11.5:2) (d) Recycled solid waste referenced in the report shall i clude only solid waste generated within the Thomas Jefferson Planning District. c.16-15. Residential and nonresidential source separation of lid waste for purposes of recycling. (a) All County permitted refuse removers shall collect and cycle source separated newspapers, container glass, metal cans d plastic soda, milk and water containers from residential its. The County will provide for the processing of newspaper d commingled recyclables collected by refuse removers from sidential units. (For state authority see VA Code 15.1-28.1) (b) All County licensed refuse removers shall offer cycling services to the owners or managers of multi-family its for which they provide refuse service, including apartment mplexes, located in the county. (c) All County licensed refuse removers shall make asonable effort to promote residential and nonresidential rticipation in a recycling program. (d) This article shall not affect the right of any person or tity to sell or otherwise dispose of waste material as provided Virginia Code section 15.1-28.03 or permitted under any other w of the Commonwealth, nor shall it impose any liability upon y refuse remover for failure of its customers to comply with is article. c.16-16. Frequency of removal All refuse removers serving residential units shall provide c llection of all recyclable materials in accordance with section 4(a) either weekly or biweekly on the same day trash is c llected. c.16-17. Scavenging It shall be unlawful for any person other than a permitted fuse remover to salvage or otherwise remove any recyclable terials set out for collection by a permitted refuse remover. ec.16-18. Permit Required. (a) Without limiting the remedies which may be obtained in is section, any person violating or failing, neglecting or fusing to obey any injunction, mandamus or other remedy o tained pursuant to this section shall be subject, in the d'scretion of the court, to a civil penalty not to exceed two t ousand dollars ($2000.00) for each violation. No person engaged in business as a refuse remover shall onduct any portion of such operation within the county, unless e has a current permit to do so issued under the County of lbemarle. ec.16-19. Permit Application. Every person desiring a permit required by this division all apply to the County of Albemarle. Such application shall ate the full name, address and telephone number of the plicant and the applicant shall therein state generally the eas within the county that he proposes to serve, the frequency collections proposed, the route sizes for each day of the ek, and a recycling plan in accordance with this ordinance. Permit Issuance or denial. (a) A permit for which an application has been filed under is division shall be issued or denied by the County of bemarle within fifteen (15) days of the receipt of such plication. (b) The County of Albemarle shall issue a permit required by is division upon receipt of valid application and a tisfactory finding that the applicant has reasonably and bstantially complied with all applicable sections of this ticle. (c) The denial of a permit for which an application has been led under this division shall be accompanied by assigned asons for the denial. (d) Violation of Article I will subject permit holder to or revocation of permit. c.16-21. Permit Expiration; renewal. All permits issued under this division shall expire on the irtieth day of June following the date of issue and shall be newed between the first day of June and the thirtieth day of ne of each year. c.16-22. Penalties (b) With the consent of any person who has violated or iled, neglected or refused to obey any regulation or order of e director of engineering, the permit issuing authority may rovide, in an order issued by the permit issuing authority gainst such person, for the payment of civil charges for iolations in specific sums, not to exceed the limitation pecified in subsection (a) of this section. Such civil charges all be instead of any appropriate civil penalty which could be i posed under subsection (a). ~ ~ ." Attachment C RECYCLING ORDINANCE SUMMARY T ere are four major elements in the Draft Recycling Ordinance: Article III. Sec.16-14 requires the reporting of recycling d ta by haulers. Subsection (b), which may be adopted at the Bard's option, requires businesses to report recycling weights. T ose businesses, including haulers, who exclusively use one of t e County authorized collection centers, permitted haulers, or v ndors known to the County (Coiners or Bryant Salvage) are not r quired to report. The intent is to capture recycling weights f om those companies which are either back shipping recyclable m terials to their home offices or are using a vendor or refuse h uler that we would not normally receive information from. Only a relative few businesses would fall under subsection (b). Since t eir input has not yet been solicited, the Board may consider a ding subsection (b) at a later date. Article III, Sec.16-15 requires all trash haulers doing siness in Albemarle County to collected newspaper, glass ttles and jars, metal cans and plastic soda, milk and water ttles from their residential customers. While it is not ndatory for a homeowner to recycle, it is mandatory that a uler pick up recyclables that his customer sets out for llection. The County provides for the processing of newspaper d commingled recyclables. is section also requires trash haulers to offer recycling rvices to apartment complexes where they provide trash service. e key word is offer. The hauler does not have to provide a cycling service unless the apartment management accepts the fer. Article III, Sec.16-16 specifies that trash haulers must ovide weekly, or at a minimum bi-weekly, recycling service for sidential customers on the same day trash is collected. The rpose is to require a consistent level of service. studies dicate that providing recycling service on a different day than ash service confuses many homeowners, leading to drastically wer participation rates. Division 2$@@::~:@::~tt:~~ requires that all trash haulers must a ply for and be.....Ts.s"ii'eda:. Permit by the County in order to engage i trash collecting within the County. The application must f:;. .~.c:..~.:1=Y a recycling plan in accordance with the ordinance!($(iHi:i@! :4.::;:.::#+:~:m. If a hauler does not plan to participate in the Couhfy b".....g.ged" commingled program then he must give us details on a s tisfactory alternative program. COMMENDATION: The Board adopt a resolution of intent to amend apter 16 of the County Code to include these recycling ovisions. / 3/16/93 DRAFT RECYCLING ORDINANCE ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL (to replace existing Article I) s Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and p rases shall have meanings respectively ascribed to them by this s ction: Garbage. All offal and refuse animal and vegetable matter. Garbage or trash collectors. All persons engaged in the b siness of picking up garbage and trash of any description by tuck or other vehicle for the delivery to a sanitary landfill a ea or other place, for disposal of the same as may be permitted b law. Generators means any entity whose act or process produces s lid waste. Multi-family dwelling means a building or portion thereof ntaining more than two (2) dwelling units and not classified as one family or two family dwelling nor as a townhouse, with not re than one family occupying each dwelling unit. Nonresidential units means businesses, both retail and olesale, including apartments with more than two dwelling its. Person means any natural person, corporation, partnership, sociation, firm, receiver, guardian, trustee, executor, ministrator, fiduciary, or representative or group of dividuals or entities of any kind. processing means the separation and marketing of recyclable terials. Recyclable materials means materials which have been source parated by any person or materials separated from solid waste r the subsequent utilization in both cases as raw material to manufactured into a new product other than fuel or energy. Recycling means the process of separating a given waste terial from the waste stream and processing it so that it is ed again as a raw material for a product, which mayor may not similar to the original product. Refuse means all solid and semiliquid wastes of a community, eluding litter, garbage, ashes, rubbish, street cleanings and lid market and industrial wastes, but not including human or ricultural animal body wastes. ,. Refuse remover means any person engaged in removing or nsporting refuse for compensation from two (2) or more idential, commercial or industrial establishments, either hin or without the county. Residential units means any housing unit within the county luding single-family dwellings, two-family dwellings, to nhouses and mobile homes. It does not include mUlti-family d ellings. Occupants of such residential units are referred to as residents. Solid waste, pursuant to Code of Virginia, section 10.1-1400 et seq. "The Virginia Waste Management Act", means any garbage, refuse, sludge or other discarded material, including solid, Ii uid, semiliquid or combined gaseous material, resulting from in ustrial, commercial, mining and agricultural operations, or co munity activities, but does not include (i) solid or dissolved ma erial in domestic sewage, (ii) solid or dissolved material in irrigation return flows or in industrial discharges which are s rces subject to a permit from the state water control board, o (iii) source, special nuclear, or byproduct material as d fined by the Federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Source separation means the separation of recyclable m terial from other refuse by a generator or source site. Trash. All rubbish, cans, bottles, containers, refuse, p per, cardboard or any other like waste or discarded materials o an inorganic nature. ARTICLE III. RECYCLING (New Article) S c.16-13. Purpose. The intent of this article is to encourage and promote cycling throughout the County in order to protect limited tural resources for the benefit of its citizens. Nonresidential and refuse removal reporting. (a) All persons involved in the collection, transportation processing of recyclable materials generated within the County annual report of their recycling activity to the County's partment of Engineering by March 1 for the previous calendar are (b) Any generator who separates recyclable material for llection by a refuse remover not permitted by the County or cycling vendor not known to the County, shall submit an annual port of their recycling activity to the County's Department of gineering by March 1 for the previous calendar year. (c) Annual reports required to be submitted hereunder shall certified by a responsible official of the generator or refuse mover and shall contain: (1) the name and address of the orting partYi (2) the total quantity (by weight) of solid te recycled by the reporting party during the reporting iodi (3) the names and addresses of the recycling vendors who eived the recycled wastei and/or (4) other information cerning waste generation, waste management and recycling uested by the Department of Engineering. Annual reports may waved for those refuse removers that exclusively use County horized collection centers or listed vendors. (For state hority see VA Code 15.1-11.5:2) (d) Recycled solid waste referenced in the report shall lude only solid waste generated within the Thomas Jefferson nning District. Se .16-15. Residential and nonresidential source separation of solid waste for purposes of recycling. (a) All County permitted refuse removers shall collect and r cycle source separated newspapers, container glass, metal cans a d plastic soda, milk and water containers from residential u its. The County will provide for the processing of newspaper a d commingled recyclables collected by refuse removers from r sidential units. (For state authority see VA Code 15.1-28.1) (b) All County licensed refuse removers shall offer r cycling services to the owners or managers of multi-family u its for which they provide refuse service, including apartment c mplexes, located in the county. (c) All County licensed refuse removers shall make r asonable effort to promote residential and nonresidential p rticipation in a recycling program. (d) This article shall not affect the right of any person or tity to sell or otherwise dispose of waste material as provided Virginia Code section 15.1-28.03 or permitted under any other w of the Commonwealth, nor shall it impose any liability upon y refuse remover for failure of its customers to comply with is article. S c.16-16. Frequency of removal All refuse removers serving residential units shall provide c llection of all recyclable materials in accordance with section 4(a) either weekly or biweekly on the same day trash is c llected. c.16-17. Scavenging It shall be unlawful for any person other than a permitted fuse remover to salvage or otherwise remove any recyclable terials set out for collection by a permitted refuse remover. S c.16-18. Permit Required. No person engaged in business as a refuse remover shall c nduct any portion of such operation within the county, unless h has a current permit to do so issued under the County of A bemarle. S Permit Application. Every person desiring a permit required by thisdivioion 6:':"'d11dfhice shall apply to the County of l\lbcm~rlc Jjep~i5;t;Jil~n)p::9:~ ~: .:g';iirt.ket.t$tlEJ. Such application shall state the fulfnarrle;ii'Odress a-.....cr.....Efil.e"};jh"one number of the applicant and the applicant shall t erein state generally the areas within the county that he p oposes to serve, the frequency of collections proposed, the r ute sizes for each day of the week, and a recycling plan in a cordance with this ordinance. Permit Issuance or denial. (a) A permit for which an application has been filed under is divioionQ*g$i1:~h($:ij shall be issued or denied by the County Albemarle wl.fhtRtt:fteen (15) days of the receipt of such plication. (b) The County of Albemarle shall issue a permit required by is di '.rioionl#gg:in~'P9'El upon receipt of valid application and a tisfactory ffri"OIng:..fhat the applicant has reasonably and bstantially complied with all applicable sections of this ticle. (c) The denial of a permit for which an application has been f'led under this divioion ordihahCe shall be accompanied by a signed reasons for the denTaL (d) violation of Article I will subject permit holder to s spension or revocation of permit. (a) Without limiting the remedies which may be obtained in is section, any person violating or failing, neglecting or fusing to obey any injunction, mandamus or other remedy o tained pursuant to this section shall be subject, in the d'scretion of the court, to a civil penalty not to exceed two t ousand dollars ($2000.00) for each violation. (b) with the consent of any person who has violated or iled, neglected or refused to obey any regulation or order of c.16-21. Permit Expiration; renewal. All permits issued under this diviaion 6i'd;i.h~h9.e shall pire on the thirtieth day of June following the da::te of issue d shall be renewed between the first day of June and the irtieth day of June of each year. c.16-22. Penalties . ' t~e director of engineering, the permit issuing authority may p~ovide, in an order issued by the permit issuing authority a~ainst such person, for the payment of civil charges for v olations in specific sums, not to exceed the limitation specified in subsection (a) of this section. Such civil charges s~all be instead of any appropriate civil penalty which could be i~posed under subsection (a). -- COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE IDJll , " } U,<, I; \:' j , ...l i., L .. ~ .1. MEMORANDUM ~ l i BOARD OF SUPERVIS(<~')J TO: FROM: DATE: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., of Supervisors e ~ I County Executiv~~ .. Albemarle County Board March 19, 1993 RE: salary supplements - Constitutional Officers have enclosed for your review a copy of the staff analysis in sponse to requests from the Constitutional Officers to locally pplement their state provided salaries. is is provided in order to discuss at the end of our worksession Monday, March 22, 1993 so as to give the issue consideration ring our budget cycle. Several of the Constitutional Officers ve requested to be present for the discussion. ould you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact T,Jrjdbm 93.056 ttachment '-r SALARY SUPPLEMENTS FOR STATE FUNDED POSITIONS Plrnose: This report will attempt to address, on a policy basis, requests from several Constitutional Officers and the Registrar for the County to consider supplementing the salary they and their employees presently receive from the Commonweal th of Virginia. For purposes of this review, the scope will be limited to the offices of the Commonweal th' s Attorney, Clerk of the Circuit Court, Sheriff's Department, Registrar and Joint Security Complex. O'~erview: In the process of compiling this report, information on each of the various offices was solicited from a core group of jurisdictions which are used by the County for purposes of wage comparisons either because of their geographic proximity to Albemarle or population range similarity. The jurisdictions surveyed include: Countv/citv Augusta County Charlottesville Chesterfield County Fauquier County Goochland County Hanover County James city county/williamsburg King George County Loudoun County Montgomery County Prince william Co./Manassas Spotsylvania County York County/Poquoson Population 54,677 40,341 210,500 48,741 14,700 65,000 38,000 (County only) 13,527 86,129 73,913 216,000 (County only) 57,403 42,422 ~lalvsis: Office of Commonwealth's Attorney Albemarle County's Commonwealth Attorney's Office is presently staffed with a Constitutional Officer, a Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney, 2 Assistant Commonwealth's Attorneys, an Administrative secretary, and a Secretary I for a total of 6 employees. Mr. Camblos has requested a supplement totaling $26,766 for 3 of his employees in order to bring their salaries in line with where he believes they should be. A review of the 13 core communities surveyed reveals 9 are providing some local supplement in the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office ranging from a total of $12,426 to $55,121 with 4 localities providing no local supplement. Average supplements ranged from $5,000 to $11,000 per Assistant Attorney. Information on larger localities submi tted by Mr. Camblos reveals some counties supplementing the office in an amount in excess of $200,000 per year (Fairfax). Sheriff's Department Albemarle County's Sheriff's Department is presently staffed with a Constitutional Officer, 10 Deputies and a secretary for a total of 12 full-time employees. Sheriff Hawkins has not requested a specific amount of supplement for his deputies. A review of the 13 core communities surveyed reveals 8 are providing some local supplement in the Sheriff's Department ranging from a total of $12,539 to $589,164 wi th 5 locali ties providing no supplement. Average supplements for Deputies ranged from $4,255 to $7,447 per Deputy. In addition, Sheriff Hawkins has requested a supplement for himself in the amount of $2,185 for a one year period to compensate him per the State Appropriations Act for a locality with a population range of 70,000 to 99,999. The Sheriff indicates that although the Center for Public Service concurs that Albemarle's population has exceeded the 70,000 threshold, the official determination will not be made in time for the Compensation Board to rely on the figures as it establishes salaries for FY 94. Sheriff Hawkins request that the County fund the difference for the one-year period until the State recognizes the new population figures. Although no request has been made by the Clerk of the Circui t Court, the same circumstance exists for her position as well with the amount needed of $5,796 for the increase differential in that position. The Commonwealth's Attorney's salary follows a different population bracket range. Clerk of the Circuit Court The Clerk of the Circuit Court Office is presently staffed with a Constitutional Officer and 8 Deputy Clerks for a total of 9 full-time employees. Mrs. Marshall has not requested a specific amount of supplement. Of the 13 core communities surveyed, 5 are providing some level of local supplement ranging from $800 to $9,656 with the average supplement for the Deputies ranging from $944 to $8,694 annually. Joint security Complex The Joint Security Complex is included in this review because those employees are, for the most part, funded by the compensation Board as are the other positions , .., reviewed. There are a total of 69 employees at the CAJSC. Comparisons with other jurisdictions is difficult in that the Sheriff operates the jail in most localities. Correctional Officers are on the same pay scale as Sheriff's Deputies and, therefore, it can be assumed that supplements in other localities should closely follow those of the Deputies referenced earlier in this review. It should be noted that the City and County are jointly involved in funding for this department and city concurrence may be necessary to participate in supplements. At the end of FY 92, both jurisdictions approved the payment of bonuses to CAJSC employees out of their excess revenues. Registrar's Office The Registrar's Office is presently staffed with a locally funded position (Assistant Registrar) and the Registrar whose salary is set by the State and paid by State funds. Mr. Heilman has specifically requested a supplement of $1,000 although the Code of Virginia allows localities to supplement the Registrar's salary up to 10% of his state salary. Mr. Heilman submitted a separate review of 15 localities in the 50,000 to 100,000 population range which indicates that 7 of 15 localities supplemented the Registrar's salary. Dliscussion: Staff reviewed the feasibility of placing these employees on the County's pay scale and compensation system. While it might provide more uniformity in personnel practices to pursue this alternative, staff feels that the checks and balances would not be present to assure uniform application of the merit review/performance evaluation system as "department heads" would not be subject to review to ensure consistency across all departments. This avenue would also be most costly as the County would incur the first and second year costs of placing 98 employees on the County's pay scale plus providing the merit pool for these employees in our pay for performance system. Research shows that there are a number of ways that various localities implement their supplement. Some provide a fixed amount for each year of service, some provide a flat sum for each job description, some provide a percentage that increases with the employee's salary, while others provide a pool for each office for the Constitutional Officer to distribute as appropriate. There does not appear to be any uniform method for applying supplements. The Board has indicated a desire to look at alternative forms of government that would bring more local control over the various offices discussed. The three ~ Constitutional Officers that are in place in the County Executive form of government are present in all other forms currently authorized by state law. Any change would, therefore, require the establishment of a new form of county government to be approved by the Virginia General Assembly. Rlcommendation: Staff recognizes that this is strictly a policy issue for the Board to consider as to whether it desires to begin supplementing state-provided salaries. There is Ii ttle question that state scales in some instances appear to be low for the job market in the Charlottesville-Albemarle area. None of the offices are experiencing significant turnover, however, several of the Constitutional Officers believe that this will soon be an issue. Should the Board begin supplementing, staff strongly recommends that a condition of such supplement be an agreement that the office involved would strictly adhere to the County's policy manual to avoid differences in holidays taken, the method by which leave is computed, and the method by which gr ievances and disputes are resolved. R~H,II/dbm 9 h 046 p 0 0 CO 0 0 0. 11'I 0 0 0 CO 0 0 M ~ >- N 0 M 0 ~ N GI 0. 0 0 M c: ,..,." " " .... e( ~ ~ M M 0 U ~ N .... .... e( ~ N ..0 ~ oj ~ :0 M c: > N 0 M" .... - 0 I- 0. N 11'I .... I- .... e( e( ~ ~ CO 0 ,..,. 0 CO 0. M CO - oj N s: N M ~ 11'I - N 11'I ..0 N ~ .... - ,..,." CO" N" r-.." 0 I- oj .... I- ~ .... e( e( CIl c: >- 0 C8 ~ N 0 oj CO 0 0. s: oj N 0 GI ~ oj M j::: oj ~ ~ c: - 0. oj N CO oj .... .... - CO" ..0" ..0" M" 0 I- oj ..0 oj N ~ CIl .... I- ~ N ~ 8. .... e( . e( -g >- 0 ~ 0 CO oj 0. N > ~ 0. r:: M 0 - ..0 M .... .... I- r-.." 8: 0 I- 11'I 11'I .... e( ea .... e( " .... ea .... CO 0 ,..,. M N 0 c: M ~ 11'I lID ea - CO N M c: 's t: ~ 0 r-.." 0 ,- N ,- CIl .... CIl ea e( CIl c: .... ~ M 0 11'I N 11'I 0 t c: CO N r-.. 11'I ea ..0 ~ ~ N N '8 t: r-.." " N" ..0" ~ ~ u '- N CIl .... CIl 0 e( ..... 11'I 11'I .... II ~ 0; c: 0. ~ ea e( I DI 0.. M M GI 8: -' ::l en >- 0 CO 0 N CO ,..,. ~ .... 11'I ;e CO M 11'I ea - M ,..,. 0 N ea .... - U GI U M oj N 0 .... w -' u en GI ..... en 0 >- ,..,. N 0 N 0. 0 11'I 11'I ~ 0 CIl .... 0 11'I ,..,. N r-.. r-.. ~ M ea - ..0 0. oj 11'I N M CIl .... U " " 0." oj" ?: GI w N ~ oj .... en ~ u GI e( en 0. 0. ~ ..0 ..0 M M .... en GI t:J oj oj ~ .: u .... GI DI ~ N ~ ] i .... CIl '~ I- ..0" " u ..0 .... t ea I- 0 a:l ;: " c ~ L.. 0 GI DI ea c: L.. 0 .... u .... ~ a:l 0 CIl c: .... f!:! !r 8- 0 .... e( ea 0 CII CIl U -g .... ~ ~ 10 CII .... ~ CIl >- .... ~ CIl .0 L.. 10 ::J: 10 8- CII ...... C -g 0 JI .jC >- 10 CII U c: .... ::E > L.. c: ~ CII c: ...... 0 ::l E .... ...... 0 10 C 8: c: '; "0 u 0 C- o M U CII <1l CIl <1: C- CIl CII >- DI >- 0 ::l .... ..... ..... CII "E .... .... L.. C ::l CIl CIl ~ 0 0 .... ..... .... 0 CII ::J: 10 8" c 10 .... .... CII <1l .... U CII c IS > 0 CII L.. GI .... 0 CII CIl t:J ::l CII 0.. Ol 0 U CIl ~ .... ::l ~ > CIl 0 DI U CIl ...... .... 10 .... ::l .... CIl g- U 0 ~ DI " .... c: .... .:.: Ol C ..... DI <1l CII 0 c: C ::l C 8- L.. CIl CII ..... ::l ~ ~ 10 0 <1l <1l 0 0 L.. 0 0 > 0 <1: u u .... '" :z: ..., ~ -' ::E 0.. en >- 0.. <1: .jC 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 -z 0 0 CO 0 0 I"l 0 I"l 0 0 N I"l ~ 0 ~ - 0 CO CO 1:)-, I:)- L. , , QI U I"l ~ I"l U 0 ~ 0 >- - Ii ... - , ~ - U 0 Il 0 U N ~ N -z ~ '" I:)- >- ~ ~ Ii ... - ,..' 1:)-' rtJ' - '5 ! u 0 u ~ 0 N ~ >- -z Ii ... '" u , , ~ 0 ~ I) 0 u 0 0 0 rtJ 0 ~ ~ >- ~ 0 rtJ ... rtJ, "', ~ 0 ,... U QI < 0 ~ '" 0 I:)- 0 0 rtJ 0 ~ -z 0 la 0 ~ ~ -z ~~ > rtJ I"l I:)- ... - ~.! u N l/l 0 8. ,~ u al ... 0 0 0 0 -z 0 > e: 0 ea L. 'G t: ~ 8: '- ea l/l l/l "tJ < L. ea 0 co 0 0 rtJ 0 N 0 -z :2 0 ~~ I"l 0: '" ~ co - '" '" ~ - , I"l' I"l' , e: Ii- QI - - N 0 ~~ u u 0 ... ea <II e: ""~ 0 0 C8 '" 0 0 0 I:)- ~ 0 0 I"l rtJ ~ 0 ~ -z N ,.. - ~ rtJ '" N ~ ~.! - , I"l' I"l' , U N ~ U 0 ~ U L. 0 .... L. X. l>:: 0 0 0 '" 0 ... ~ e: QI ~ ~ QI co ~ ..... I ~ I- 0 U ~ 0 III lllI III 0 0 ,.. 0 0 0 0 0 I:)- 0 rtJ 0 0 '" ;g C8 N rtJ N '" ~ N ~ ~ ea L. - , I"l' U QI U I"l 0 0 ..J U .... 0 0 rtJ 0 0 0 ,.. 0 I:)- rtJ <II ... ~ ,.. ~ <II - '" ,.. l/l i - I"l' ?: l- i: u ea l- e: < I ~ 0 N ~ -z 0 ~ .c -z I"l rtJ u l- i QI :IE: -z I:)- ~ I- ~ 0 N 0 1 ... l/l '~ l- i: u I- "tJ e: L. 0 ~ Cl <lJ L. L. 0 ... QI .6 co - <II U ~ ~ 8. ... lU e: <II u "tJ ~ - lU QI 0 - <II >- ... u 'i l/l .0 L. <lJ 8. ... ..... e: "tJ '5 >- <lJ Qj Qj ... :IE: > L. U QI e: ~ 0 L. - ~ L. ..... - 0 <lJ e: 8:- u '; "tJ u 0 < 8: I"l Qj <lJ <II .... l/l QI >- Cl >- 0 ~ .... 0 Qj "2 ... L. L. 'i e: ~ <II <II 0 ... .... L. 0 ~ lU 8" e: QI ea ... L. QI lU L. U Qj e: > 0 Qj I"l U ... 0 QI QI <.:I ~ Qj ll. Cl l/l ... ~ .c > <II 0 Cl U <II ..... ... ea .... ~ L. l/l g- U 0 2! Cl -g ... e: ... "'" Cl .... Cl ea QI 0 e: e: e: 8. L. <II Qj 0 ~ .c .c lU 0 ea ea ,- 0 0 L. 0 0 > < u u .... <.:I :J: ...., ~ ..J :IE: ll. III >- ll. < a a '" 0- a ~ a a -4" a r:! a a II"l ~ ... 0: -4" a ~ a ... -4" '" -4" r-- .- , -0' 0- .. ~ '" -4" II"l Q/ ~ ~ .s::. III ~ ~ '" '" Q/ II"l II"l al N to' to ~ .. ~ <.:J a II"l to to a a II"l r-- r-- II"l -4" II"l ~ II"l 0- -4" II"l '" a Q/ r--' r--' 1:1 ~ II"l to 0- eu ~ ~ ~ .. <.:J a N a ~ r-- a 0- a II"l II"l r-- ~ ~ ;;:j -4" N a N -4" -8 '" N r-- 0- -4" a a' r--' eu ~ -4" '" -0 a -0 .. II"l N II"l <.:J a Ie '" a r-- a to a N -0 ~ a N '" 8: 0- r:! -4" Ie -8 -- to 0- -- , , to' ",' eu 0- -- N '" -4" -0 .. '" -- N <.:J III r-- c: a '" (f. :0 a Ie a a ;8 a ;8 '" N 0 -0 :0 -0 ~ Q/ 0- -4" 0- '" a 0- .... 1:1 r--' .- eu to -4" '" -0 -0 II"l '" III .. II"l ~ 8. <.:J "i a ~ ~ ~ a r-- a a II"l a r-- a 0- ~ '" > '" to -0 -4" II"l 0- '" 0 Q/ -- '" -- N '" -4" -0 II"l N .. 1:1 , ~' 1I"l' -4"' 8: eu r-- N II"l a to II"l .. ~ eu <.:J II"l 1:1 .. eu ... .s::. a N a N a to ~ 0- -0 0 ... U to II"l N ~ II"l ~ Oll eu Q/ "', N a II"l 0- 1I"l, .... .... -0' c: III ~ to 0- N '" 0 .e u ~ III .... eu C ... III r-- c: Oll a a a a a -0 a '" a ~ ~ III r-- '" 0- II"l II"l III .. 0- to II"l to Q/ Q/ U > a a a -4" u 0 .. N ~ ~ .. Q/ .. a.. III 0 ... C a a ~ a .... III c: III .. I Q/ Q/ u > 0 .. .. Q/ ~ a.. III N III IjI ~ .. a a a to '" -0 N ~ -4" Q. ~ a -4" -0 Ie 0- ~ 0- ~ eu :J -4" a a N -0 r-- eu .... III r--- u Q/ N N II"l a N 0 .. g ~ ~ ~ .... u Q/ ... III U 0 >. . .. a -4" to a a :0 a ~ a N a N -0 -4" III .. 8- N ~ -0 a II"l to 0- '" ~ .- eu r-- 0- 0- to 0- a -0 0- a III .... 0 r--' r--' 1I"l' >- Q/ II"l N N a t .. g ~ eu u c: Q/ C III U ~ 0: 8: a r-- a l1'l ~ '" ;::: -4" eu ~ -4" l1'l a 0- .. .. to' N- r--- ~ Q/ to N Q/ u <.:J ~ l1'l N N .... 0- -4" ~ III ~ -4" II"l .. i -0' Q/ N -4" U .... "0 c: .. a Cl '" .. a .... .5 Oll III i!:! ~ a a. '" rJJ U "0 eu Qj rJJ >- .... :i rJJ ..0 '- '" 8. ~ c: "i ... '" Qj ... .... ::IE: > '- Q/ C ... 0 .. ~ :J e '- ... Q/ ~ 0 '" c 8:- .s::. ':; ~ u a C 8: II"l III Qj '" rJJ III Qj >- Cl >- 0 :J ... ... Q/ "E .... '- '- C :J rJJ rJJ 0 0 .... ... .. a ~ 3 '" 8" c eu .... .. Q/ '" .. u Qj c > 0 Qj '" Q/ .... 0 Q/ '5 Qj <.:l :J Qj ~ 0.. Cl U III .... .s::. > rJJ a Cl u rJJ ... .... '" :J .. rJJ g- U 0 ~ Cl -g .... c .... ~ Cl ... Cl eu Qj 0 c c c 8. '- rJJ Qj ... :J .s::. .s::. eu 0 '" eu 0 a .. a a > 0 c u u ... <.:J :x: .., ~ .... ::IE: 0.. CIl > 0.. C ~ l/) z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I..1Jz a... a... a... a... a... (V) zc:x: 0'\ C:X:~ N N ...-i ...-i (V) ........ ::El/) N e::: ...... N I..1J l/) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ........ a... l/) I..L. I..L. I..L. I..L. I..L. I..L. I..L. a... I..L. I..L. I..L. I..L. I..L. a... I..L. ...-i c:x: <:) "'*' ...-i N ...-i ...-i N ...-i ...-i ...-i N N ...-i ...-i ...-i ...-i ...-i I..1J ~ <:) >-c:x: <:) ~ ~~ ........ ...... l/) <:) ~ U <:) Z c:x: ~ ~ c:x: ~ c:x: c:x: ~ ,....." c:x: c:x: c:x: c:x: Cl>l!. I..1J ........ <:) ~L.O~ ........ <:) ........ ........ <:) ...-i ........ ........ ........ ........ <:) ::E z ...-i (V) ...-i L.O Z ...-i Z Z ...-i ~ Z Z Z Z ...-i I..1J -l a... -lC a... l/) l/) l/) l/) l/) l/) l/) => <:) I..1J I..1J I..1J <:) I..1J <:) <:) l.LJ l.LJ <:) <:) <:) <:) l.LJ l/) Z >- >- >- z >- z z >- >- z z z z >- l/) z <:) >- ...... 0'\ 0'\ o::t (V) 0'\ L.O L.O co ,....." <:) \0 <:) co \0 ...-i <:) -l~ ...-i N (V) <:) ~ <:) <:) L.O <:) <:) L.O \0 L.O ,...... <:) O'\e:::c:x: <:) ...-i ...-i ,....." ,....." N ...-i (V) N ...-i L.O o::t L.O L.O 0'\ c:x: e::: .. .. .. ...-i l.LJ ~ o::t o::t o::t N N N N N N (V) N ...-i ...-i ...-i ...-i I >- l/) ,....." ...... co C.!H..!J 0'\ :> l.LJ ...-iC:X:e::: +-' z c: <:) OJ ...... E ~ >, c:x: tC e::: 0.. ~ l/) o::t 0'\ co 0'\ co 0'\ <:) ,....." L.O ,....." N N ...-i \0 co E ...... <:) L.O L.O 0'\ \0 ...-i ...-i (V) L.O N 0'\ <:) o::t 0'\ L.O :::J c..!J ...-i (V) 0'\ L.O L.O ...-i (V) co \0 \0 N ...-i L.O (V) L.O Vl l/) l.LJ .. .. .. I ~ e::: ,....." L.O co ,....." ,....." 0'\ (V) o::t <:) N 0'\ \0 o::t o::t \0 0.. Z (V) o::t o::t N (V) N N N (V) o::t N N N N N E c:x: ~ :::J ~ Z r- l/) l.LJ - ...... e::: l/) e::: c: l/) => 0 c:x: U +-' ~ tC Z Vl l.LJ c: Z OJ c:x: 0.. ::E E e::: a... 0 l.LJ <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) u a... a... o::t <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) <:) (V) ...-i o::t (V) N ...-i ,....." <:) o::t 0'\ ,....." ...-i L.O 0'\ '"'0 Cl <:) .. OJ Z 0'\ CO 0'\ \0 ,....." (V) ...-i (V) o::t \0 \0 (V) L.O N ,....." \0 I- c:x: 0'\ \0 ,....." CO L.O \0 \0 L.O L.O \0 0'\ ,....." L.O L.O L.O L.O I- ...-i OJ l/) '+- ~ OJ Z '"'0 l.LJ ::E l.LJ tC -l :::J a... c: a... c: => tC l/) >- ~ Vl Z Z c:x: >- c:x: tC <:) => ...... ~ ...... <:) z >- z ::E '"'0 c:x: l.LJ U c:x: c..!J u e::: c:x: c:x: OJ ~ >- -l ;::- Cl l.LJ e::: W :> :c > c:x: ~ e::: I..1J z -l e::: e::: -l c:x: => w ::E -l ~ c..!J Cl ...... c:x: ~ => >- W <:) -l ~ a::l ~ <:) >- -l Z GJ -l ::E <:) <:) l/) :> I..L. ...... l/) :c c:x: c..!J l/) <:) ...... >- U (V) c:x: w z 0 ~ <:) I..L. :> => u z ~ ~ l.L. ~ e::: GJ 0'\ U a::l c:x: => <:) z c:x: z c..!J z c:x: z ~ l.L. U Z e::: 0'\ <:) -l <:) <:) a... c:x: ~ c:x: => >- <:) ~ ...... => <:) W ...-i .....J c:x: e::: .....J l/) :c l/) Cl c:x: -l e::: a... V> e::: :c -lC . ;~' 4r, .;~1::.' ., ':,,~~;< :7',. :l' L..'.',', i... ~ '.i.- k",j.. !,>' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 41 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 lie 57 58 59 10 61 62 83 14 15 81 43 lie Authority: Title 14.1, Chapter 1, Articles 7 and 9, Code of Virginia, A. The annual salaries of the sheriffs of the several counties and cities of the Commonwealth shall be as hereinafter prescribed, according to the population of the city or county served and whether the sheriff is charged with civil processing and courtroom security responsibilities only, or the added responsibilities of law enforcement or operation of a jail, or both. Execution of arrest warrants shall not, in and of itself, constitute law enforcement responsibilities for the purpose of determining the salary for which a sheriff is eligible. No Law Entorcellent or Jail Reaponalbllltles 1992.93 1993.94 July I December I July 1 to to to Population November 30 June 30 November 30 December to June 30 Less than 10,000 534,S81 53S,273 53S,273 $35,978 10,000 19.999 539,900 140.698 540,698 $41,512 20,000 39,999 544.334 54S,221 54S,221 $46,125 40.000 69. 999 S48. 768 549.743 S49,743 'SO. 738 70 , 000 99,999 S50,910 S51.928 S5 I. 928 '52.967 100,000 249,999 S60. 244 561,449 561,449 $62,678 Over 250,000 573,820 575,296 575,296 $76, 802 Law Enforcement or Jet 1 Population 1992-93 1993-94 July I December I July 1 to to to November 30 June 30 November 30 December 1 to June 30 Less than 10,000 $35 , 909 536,627 536,627 $37.360 10,000 19,999 $42,561 543,412 $43.412 '44,280 20 , 000 39 , 999 546,993 547.933 $47,933 $48.892 40,000 69 . 999 $49,654 550,647 550,647 $51.660 70,000 99,999 554 , 085 555,167 555,167 $56,270 100,000 249,999 563.841 565,116 565,118 $66.420 Over 250,000 578,052 579,613 579,613 $81,205 Law Enforcement and Ja il 1992-93 1993-94 July I December 1 July I December 1 to to to to Population November 1 June 30 November 30 June 30 10,000 19,999 542,561 $43,412 $43,412 $44,380 20 . 000 39,999 $47,882 $48,840 548,840 $49,817 40,000 69 , 999 5S0,540 5SI.551 $51,551 $52,582 70,000 99 . 999 $54.974 $56,073 $56,073 '57,194 100 , 000 249.999 564,725 566.020 $66,020 $67,340 Over 250,000 $78.914 580,492 580,492 $82,102 B. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the governing body of any county or city from supplementing the salary of the sheriff in such county or city for additional services not required by general law; provided, however, that such supplemental salary shall be paid wholly by such county or city. C. Out of the amounts for Financial Assistance to Local Law Enforcement Officials, no expenditures shall be made to provide security devices such as magnetometers in standard Item DetallS($) First Year Second Year Approprlatlons($) First Year Second Year :If' :: I I I I I j ~ ''';1' .~ ,I :! I 4 I II 17 8 II .. 21 f';22 '.c23 ....24 ~h25 ,. Z7 Z8 It '. Il S2 33 If 35 H S7 sa 31 4. 41 42 43 44 45 " 47 48 41 51 51 52 53 54 55 51 57 58 51 eE n 14 IS " 51 operations of the offices of the circuit court clerks. B.l. The annual salaries of clerks of circuit courts. notwithstanding the salary provisions of ~ 14.1-143.2A of the Code of Virginia, shall be as hereinafter prescribed. The annual salaries shall be in accordance with the provisions of ~14.1-143.2B-I of the Code of Virginia. 1992-93 1993-94 July 1 December 1 July 1 December 1 to to to to population November 30 June 30 November 30 June 30 o . 9,999 $45,469 $46,378 $46,378 $47,306 10,000 - 19,999 $56,025 $57,146 $57,146 $58,289 20,000 - 39,999 $64,146 $65,429 $65,429 $66, 738 40,000 . 69,999 $67 , 393 $88,741 $88,741 $10,116 70,000 . 99.999 $73,075 $74,537 $74,537 $76,028 100,000 - 249,999 $79,572 $81,163 $81,163 $82,786 250,000 and above $84,445 $86,134 $86,134 $87,857 2. Whenever a clerk of a circuit court is such for a county and a city, for two or more counties, or for two or more cities, the aggregate population of such political subdivisions shall be the population for the purpose of arriving at the salary of the circuit court clerk under the provisions of this Item. 3. In the event that the salary fixed herein for any clerk Is less than that clerk retained from fee and commission Income of the office pursuant to ~ 14.1-143.1 as it was In effect on December 31, 1981, or ~ 14.1-143 as it was In effect on December 31, 1980, such clerk sball receive an amount equal to the amount retained from fees and commissions for calendar year 1980 or 1981, wblcbever is hlgber. Sucb additional amount sball be retained by the clerk for the duration of bls term or bis subsequent terms of office, or until sucb salary fixed bereln sball exceed the amount to wblcb he would bave previously been entitled. Tbe additional amount shall be retained only to the extent that It Is earned from fee and commission Income to the office for each fiscal year beginning July 1. 1982. 4. Tbe annual salary bereln prescribed sball be full compensation for services performed by the office of the circuit court clerk as prescribed by general law, and for the additional services of acting as general receiver of the court pursuant to ~ 8.01-582 of the Code of Virginia, indexing and filing land use application fees pursuant to ~ 58-769.8 of the Code of Virginia, and all other services provided from, or utilizing the facilities of, the office of the circuit court clerk. Pursuant to ~ 8.01-589 of the Code of Virginia the court sball provide reasonable compensation to the office of the clerk of the circuit court for acting as general receiver of the court. Out of the compensation so allowed, the clerk shall pay bis bond or bonds. The remainder of the compensation so allowed sball be fee and commission Income to the office of the circuit court clerk. 5. The salaries herein prescribed sball be paid from fee and commission Income of the office of the clerk In each political subdivision. In the event that fee and commission income Is not sufficient to pay the salary for a clerk as herein prescribed, the additional required amount shall be paid from the state treasury upon voucbers approved by the State Item Details( $) First Year Second Year ApproprlatlonS($) First Year Second Year I 4 I OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY for the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE JAMES L. CAMBLOS, III COMMONW ALTH'S ATTORNEY January 8, 1993 J. FORD CHILDRESS CHERYL V. HIGGINS ASSISTANTS WARNER D. CHAPMAN Thank you for having lunch with me and listening to my quest for salary supplements in the Commonwealth's Attorney's fice. I will attempt to outline in this letter my thoughts c ncerning the reason for requesting supplements and the benefits ined by the County in funding them. PHONE: (804) 977-2897 FAX: (804) 977-7856 . David P. Bowerman 3 Berwick Court arlottesville, Virginia 22901 Re: Salary Supplements David: The Albemarle County Commonwealth's Attorney's Office has ur attorneys and two staff assistants. At the present time the sitions are as follows: Position Yrs in Office as Class of 1/1/93 Salary Commonwealth's Attorney CA 72,698 Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney ATTIV 5.00 48,375 Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney ATTII 5.00 33,872 Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney ATTI 5.00 30,984 Administrative Assistant AAI 1. 00 18,984 Secretary SECI 7.00 17,362 I have an excellent staff, both in attorneys and staff a sistants. If you ask anyone who is knowledgeable about it, I t ink they will tell you that. 410 EAST HIGH STREET, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902 M . David P. Bowerman J. nuary 8, 1993 P ge Two Dave Chapman has been practicing law for 13 years; he has bl en prosecuting for five of those years. and he is extremely k~owledgeable in all areas of the law. He is mc~st definitely chief commonwealth's attorney material. Dave has m( ny responsibilities as Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney, as well as t affic court three days each week and Circuit Court on any given d(y. Ford Childress has been practicing law for seven years, al d has been prosecuting for five of those years. He is well- o ganized, fair and efficient in the performance of his duties. H s primary responsibility is the Albemarle County General District curt, which has an incredible number of cases going through it ecch month. Cheryl Higgins has been practicing law for six years, and p'osecuting for five of those years. You may remember that she c<me to our office from the City Commonwealth's Attorney's Office. Sle is an excellent prosecutor, and may very well be chief plosecutor material at some point in the future. I think she is a g eat asset to the County for a number of reasons, chiefly as a plosecutor and secondarily because she gives us a perspective from a woman's point of view, which is very helpful in a number of Cc sese Her primary area of responsibility is Juvenile and Domestic RE lations District Court, with a secondary responsibility of C'rcuit Court. Carrie Edwards is my Administrative Assistant. She has wcrked for me for four and a half years, and she is invaluable. See is smart, extremely well-organized, and takes the initiative in getting the job done. Carrie has unlimited potential within the s~stem, some of which will come with experience and maturity. Her pl imary area of responsibility is the criminal docket and the mcnaging of the cases in our courts. You might liken her job to a tlaffic controller of the criminal caseload. Lydia Layne has been working as a Secretary in the Ccmmonwealth's Attorney's Office for seven years. She was very m~ch an under-utilized asset with my predecessors, but her role has e>panded quite a bit since I took office. Her primary area of responsibility is the physical plant within the office, the budget, ard office supplies. . David P. Bowerman nuary 8, 1993 ge Two These five people really do make my job easier and more joyable. My focus with this request, is to receive from the unty salary supplements for Ford Childress, Cheryl Higgins and dia Layne. I would like to see both Ford and Cheryl making 0,000.00 each, and for Ms. Layne to be making $18,984.00. There are a number of compelling reasons why the County supplemental salaries in the Commonwealth's Attorneys o fice. First and foremost, these requested increases are more in l'ne with other localities, given their experience and the high c st of living in Albemarle County. As you know, the legal responsibility of this office is prosecute those individuals who violate the laws of the mmonwealth. There is no requirement for us to prosecute county arges or to perform any services outside of the office, such as cture, teach, etc. But that is not what we are about, we want to involved as much as possible, and to do as good a job as ssible, both in and out of the office. It is because my staff is a good as it is, that we are able to perform all the duties we do, without additional assistance. Secondly, the County is re-defining the job description d salary for the County Attorney who will replace George st. hn, which makes this an appropriate time for the County to be re- sessing, both from a practical and an equitable standpoint, the laries to be paid to county and commonwealth attorneys. In the general district court alone, there is over $100,000.00 in revenue to the County each year. I do not have the figures for the juvenile court or the circuit court, but I am sure it is a large amount. In addition, I estimate that the attorneys in this office spend up to 25% of their time dealing with matters ot er than Commonwealth cases; all of which has a direct benefit to th County. Enclosed is a document that surprised me, and should prise you as well, which reflects salary supplements for a ber of Commonwealth's Attorney's offices in the state. What is shown on these sheets are the attorney positions that are fully ded by the localities. (Charlottesville is included, because I w for a fact that there is a funded position in that office.) ave added to these documents the populations of the localities an supplementation totals provided by each locality. This is not a complete list for the Commonwealth, as I was unable to obtain do umentation for all localities. However, I do believe that it gi es us a clear picture for many localities, larger, smaller and of similar populations. M . David P. Bowerman J nuary 8, 1993 P ge Four I do not have any illusions to being able to hold on to staff forever if we do not do something about their salaries. ug Wilder and the Compensation Board have not done anything for veral years now, which is reflected in the salary levels as you e them. Other localities have face up to the issue as reflected the documentation enclosed. Supplementation of salaries is an sue that apparently has long been avoided by our Board of pervisors, and I don't think you cannot afford to ignore it any nger. There is a certain amount of prestige in being a osecutor, and, surprising as it may seem to you, sometimes it can a fun job. Those are intangibles, but they certainly do not lp you buy groceries. Given the very high standards that we have Albemarle County with the well-educated population professional tizenry, to insure to that population a well-run, efficient and ofessional staff for now and in the future, should be a paramount ty of the Board. I do not expect this office to be supplemented to the tent that some of the larger jurisdictions do, but we should be mparable to Suffolk and Roanoke (both City and County). bemarle County should be competitive with the rest of the State insure that we have a qualified and motivated legal staff. The c tizens of the County deserve no less. I very much appreciate your support, and I wait to hear om you as to what changes I should make to this request prior to bmitting it to the County; who I should talk to; and whether or t you want me to supply any additional information that would aid the process. Very yours, . Camblos, III J C,IIIjcae E closures POPULATION (1990) ROUNDED ~ Beach 111,000 40,000 152,000 209,000 818,000 49,000 19,000 63,000 218,000 35,000 86,000 66,000 170,000 261,000 104,000 203,000 96,000 79,000 57,000 61,000 52,000 393,000 26,000 $108,964 40,570 96,769 55,121 216,398 35,702 29,801 13,070 169,131 21,846 12,426 21,844 41,960 150,783 79,376 152,000 78,383 22,832 24,150 53,782 30,955 135,910 24,000 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ~ Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive ~ 11 March 16, 1993 rW Draft statement for VDOT Pre-Allocation Hearing on Karch 26, 1993 tached is the statement staff has prepared for Mr. Bowerman to esent to the Commonwealth Transportation Board on Friday, March , 1993, as it relates to the Pre-Allocation Hearing on Interstate d Primary Systems. Please review this statement and provide mments to Mr. Brandenburger or me regarding any changes you deem e appropriate. If you feel this should be discussed with the tire Board, we can plan on doing that at either of your budget rksessions on March 22nd or 24th. ould you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact T,Jr/dbm .052 tachment DRAFT STATEMENT OF DAVID P. BOWERMAN, CHAIRMAN ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD PRE-ALLOCATION HEARING ON INTERSTATE AND PRIMARY SYSTEMS CULPEPER DISTRICT MARCH 26, 1993 GOOD MORNING, I'M DAVID BOWERMAN, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF PERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY. WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO E A FEW BRIEF COMMENTS ABOUT OUR PRIMARY ROAD NEEDS. BEFORE DISCUSSING SPECIFIC ROAD NEEDS, WE WANT TO RECOGNIZE E OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES POSED BY THE NEW ISTEA GISLATION. HOW ISTEA WILL AFFECT THE STATE AND LOCALITY AND HOW I WILL BE IMPLEMENTED IS A CRITICAL ISSUE FOR ALL OF US. OUR CENT EFFORTS TO ACHIEVE THIS UNDERSTANDING HAS BEEN FRAUGHT WITH A LACK OF DEFINITIVE INFORMATION. AT THE LOCAL LEVEL, WE ARE L TERALLY "SHOOTING AT A MOVING TARGET." WHAT WE HEAR TODAY MAY GE TOMORROW, AND OFTEN DOES. THE NET RESULT IS THAT MANY AND PROCEDURE QUESTIONS GO UNANSWERED. THIS MAKES IT TREMELY DIFFICULT FOR US TO OBTAIN CREDITABLE INFORMATION ON ICH TO BASE OUR PLANNING AND RECOMMENDATIONS. WHILE THE EVOLVING POLICY AND PROCEDURES AS EXTENSIVE AS THAT REQUIRED BY LEGISLATION IS EXPECTED, WE ONLY ASK THAT YOU CONSIDER ME MEANS OF PROVIDING PERIODIC UPDATES AND INFORMATION FORUMS TO EP US ABREAST OF THESE CHANGES. TH THIS BACKGROUND, LET ME ADDRESS OUR ROAD NEEDS. YOU ASKED FOR MMENTS DIRECTED TO THE NEW ISTEA CATEGORIES. MY COMMENTS FOCUS THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM D ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE PRIORITIES SUBMITTED TO YOU LAST YEAR. EY ARE STILL FOUNDED ON TWO CRITICAL DECISIONS WHICH WE HAVE ALL AFFIRMED: FIRST, THE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE CHARLOTTESVILLE EA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (CATS) AND SECOND, THE MUTUAL AGREEMENT TWEEN THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY ALBEMARLE AND COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD REGARDING THE OF THESE AND OTHER ROAD PROJECTS. REGARDLESS OF THE GES WROUGHT BY ISTEA, THE ADHERENCE TO THESE TWO DECISIONS IS CRITICAL TO ADDRESSING THE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF OUR OF CHARLOTTESVILLE IS TO BE PART OF THE NATIONAL SYSTEM (NHS). THE MPO AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DOES NOT INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ROUTE 29 BYPASS AT THIS TIME AS WAS COMMENDED BY THE DEPARTMENT. THIS DECISION WAS BASED ON THE OF INFORMATION ON HOW SUCH A DESIGNATION WOULD IMPACT THIS AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS FOR OUR COMMUNITY. REGARDLESS, SECTION OF ROUTE 29 NORTH OF THE 250 BYPASS, IS OPOSED TO BE PART OF THE NHS. THUS, THE PLANNED WIDENING OF THIS FROM THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO THE RIVANNA RIVER, AS AS THE GRADE SEPARATED INTERCHANGES AT RIO ROAD, HYDRAULIC AD, AND GREENBRIER DRIVE, FULLY SUPPORT THE INTENT OF THE NHS. EY ARE ELIGIBLE FOR NHS FUNDING AND CONTINUE TO BE OUR HIGHEST IORITY WITHIN THE NHS CATEGORY. THE WIDENING OF ROUTE 29 NORTH MOVING FORWARD AND WE ARE AWARE THE DEPARTMENT WILL BEGIN TAILED PLANNING FOR THE INTERCHANGES BUT WE HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS THE CONSTRUCTION FUNDING FOR THESE GRADE SEPARATED INTERCHANGES. SERVICE LEVELS ON ROUTE 29 NORTH WILL NOT IMPROVE WITHOUT THEM REQUEST THAT THESE BE INCLUDED IN THE STATE'S NHS PROGRAM FACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM ERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE OFFER FOR YOUR THESE ARE MORE DEFINITELY ADDRESSED IN A REPORT WE THEY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SURFACE SPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROJECTS: S FETY PROJECTS INCLUDE: . CLOSING OF CROSSOVERS ALONG U.S. 29 NORTH AS RECOMMENDED IN A VDOT STUDY ADOPTED BY BOTH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND REAFFIRMED BY YOU ON NOVEMBER 9, 1989; · IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ROUTE 240 UNDERPASS AT THE CSX RAILROAD IN CROZET; · DEVELOPING FUNCTIONAL PLANS FOR ROUTE 20 NORTH AND SOUTH FOR ALIGNMENT IMPROVEMENTS; . CONDUCTING A ROADWAY ANALYSIS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO U.S. 250 EAST FROM ITS INTERCHANGE AT I-64 EASTWARD TO THE FLUVANNA COUNTY LINE; E HANCEMENT PROJECTS INCLUDE: . BEAUTIFICATION OF ENTRANCE CORRIDORS, PARTICULARLY ROUTE 29 NORTH AND ROUTE 250 EAST; . CONSTRUCTION OF BIKEWAY FACILITIES; · DEVELOPMENT OF A THOMAS JEFFERSON PARKWAY ALONG ROUTE 53 FROM ROUTE 20 TO MONTICELLO; S ANDARD PROJECTS INCLUDE: · UNDERTAKING CATS PROJECTS AS OUTLINED IN OUR MUTUAL AGREEMENT AS WELL AS THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MEADOW CREEK PARKWAY; · WIDENING OF U. S. ROUTE 250 WEST FROM EMMET STREET TO ROUTE 637 IN IVY; · IMPROVING THE NORTH/SOUTH CONNECTION BETWEEN ROUTE 250 AND ROUTE 240; · DEVELOPING DESIGN PLANS FOR THE WIDENING OF FONTAINE AVENUE FROM JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE TO THE SECTION CURRENTLY BEING WIDENED BY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT. MPLETION OF THESE PROJECTS IN A TIMELY MANNER IS LARGELY A CTION OF AVAILABLE FUNDING. WHILE ISTEA MAY INCREASE OUR ACTUAL THE INFUSION OF ADDITIONAL FEDERAL DOLLARS, THE ROAD OF OUR COMMUNITY DICTATE THAT WE CONTINUE TO RECEIVE A FAIR E OF THE DISTRICT'S AVAILABLE FUNDS. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT THESE ISSUES AND IF ESTIONS ARISE, OF IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED REGARDING RECOMMENDATIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT ME OR A STAFF. R B/dbm 9 .008 f,;;~~u. VI ~GINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1993 SPRING ALLOCATmi) . I (j FOR THE -, INTERSTATE~ PRIMARY~ AND URBAN SYSTEHS~ AND FOR MASS TRAN ITMAR , 9 118 ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRIORITIES ')~RO Of SUPERV Th following addresses Albemarle County priorities for each allocation of the In ermodal Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and each sub-allocation of th Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. Co~gestion KitiRation and Air Quality Improvement ProRram Th s does not apply to Albemarle County. The County is not in an area of no attainment for ozone or carbon monoxide. Na ional Hi2hwav System (NHS) ThE Charlottesville-Albemarle MPO Technical Committee and Policy Board have ap roved the NHS as proposed by VDOT in this area excluding the Route 29 BYlass. No other NHS designations are recommended. The County's highest pr ority project in the proposed NHS is the widening of Route 29 North from thE Corporate limits of Charlottesville to Airport Road, including immediate de ign/acquisition and ultimate construction of interchanges at Greenbrier Dr ve and Hydraulic and Rio Roads. The County seeks active participation in ROlte 29 Corridor studies, including the upcoming study of the Charlottesville to Warrenton segment of the Corridor. SUl face Transportation Program (STP) Sa ety Improvements: Se,eral projects in the County seem to qualify under this 10% set-aside. They are, in priority order: 1) The closing of the remalnlng Route 29 North crossovers recommended for closure in a VDOT study adopted by the Board of Supervisors on May 10, 1979 and reaffirmed by the Board on November 8, 1989. 2) Improvements to the Route 240 underpass at the CSX Railroad in Crozet. 3) Functional plans for Route 20 North and South for alignment improvements. 4) Analysis of possible safety improvements to Route 250 East from its interchange at 1-64 eastward to the Fluvanna County line. Enh~ncement Proiects: Sev~ral projects appear to be eligible for enhancement funds. They are, in priprity order: 1) Beautification of entrance corridors (particularly Route 29 and Route 250) - landscaping, signage, undergrounding of overhead utilities. 2) Construction of bikeway facilities as prioritized in the Bicycle Plan for the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County (adopted by the Board of Supervisors as a element of the Comprehensive Plan on July 17, 1991). 3) Development of a Thomas Jefferson Parkway along Route 53 from Route 20 to Monticello as recommended in the Blue Ridge Neighborhood Study (amended into the Comprehensive Plan by the Board of Supervisors on September 18, 1991). The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation has requested the County's assistance in pursuing this concept (see attached letter). 4) Development of portions of the Rivanna River Greenway path system. 5) Development of sidewalks/pathways as recommended in Pedestrian Obstacles Study Phase II (1987). 6) Removal of non-conforming billboards. St Pro'ects: Be and aforementioned projects, there are other projects eligible for STP fu ds not set aside. They are, in priority order: 1) Undertake those Charlottesville Area Transportation Study (CATS) projects eligible for the primary program in sequence as called for in the February 2, 1992 joint resolution between the City, County and University and agreed to by VDOT. In addition to Route 29 improvements already mentioned, construct Meadow Creek Parkway from the Route 250 Bypass to Route 29 North. The first phase of this project will be funded in the County's secondary program. The County believes the parkway will meet the criteria for inclusion in the primary system and wants to work with VDOT staff to evaluate construction of subsequent phases as a primary road if this will accelerate the parkway's completion. VDOT is urged to investigate all possible funding sources to achieve the quickest construction of this vitally important roadway. Projects in the northern urbanized area not eligible for primary funds, but listed in CATS, such as the Hydraulic Road/Route 250 Bypass interchange, should be actively pursued. 2) Undertake road projects parallel to Route 29 which relieve traffic on Route 29, such as the Berkmar Drive completion and the Greenbrier Drive/Seminole Trail connector, concurrent with the Route 29 improvements. 3) Improve the north/south connection between Route 250 and Route 240 in Crozet, either through an improved alignment of Route 240 from Route 250 northward to Route 810, or construction of the Route 240-Route 250 connector road recommended in the County's Comprehensive Plan. 4) Widen Route 250 West from Emmett Street to Route 637 in Ivy. That portion from Emmett Street to the Route 29/250 Bypass is under joint design study by the City, County and University of Virginia and was recognized for improvement in the Lewis Mountain Neighborhood Study. 5) Develop design plans for the widening of Fontaine Avenue from Jefferson Park Avenue to the improvements being undertaken along the frontage of the University Real Estate Foundation development. 6) Construct an interchange on 1-64 at Avon Street (Route 742). VW</blb/jcw Mr. Wayne Cilimberg Director of Planning and Community Albemarle County Office Building t1U1 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596 ~~J r:~' fl'....\ ;0"'; .IJ, I'",'J ,_" li Ii:L OJ"",' ~.~. .~ Q( 11,.. il ]) N o v'",:, ~ i77" 1"992 Develorment I I'! U .1 IUU'" .- ~.'J }7(. Pianninfj Deot. Dear Mr. Cilimberg, The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation, Inc. 1S currently interviewing landscape architectural firms to develop a rendered conceptual plan and narrative for a section of the Thomas Jefferson Parkway, the 1.6 mile section of Route 53 from Route 20 to thE: 1,1ont icello entrance. The purpose of this plan is to suggest the possibilities of a Parkway and to serve as a basis to raise funding, whether private or governmental, for its implementation. The County's Comprehensive Plan, as amended by the "Blue Ridge Neighborhood Study" (June I 1991, prepared by your department), out lines the justification Clnd implementation for a "Parkway to Monticello" which would "allow for safe and efficient traffic movement and preserve the rural character of the area." The Foundation hopes, as well, to create a scenic, landscaped road to lend credence to the name change; to develop a parkway spann1ng a picturesque, rural setting on the way to one of this country's most signif icant histor ica I properties. We feel a parkway is more than a road, but a linear park with a roadway within it. The George Washington Parkway, the Blue Ridge Parkway, and the Colonial Parkway are the models we have in mind. The recent acquisition of 105 acres adjacent to Route 53 has inspired the Foundation to take the initial steps to make the concept of the parkl.-Jay a tangible reality Clnd to want to work with the County toward that goal. I 1I1l\\ \\ /1 II I 1l\1):-" .\11 .\1 () I< 1,\ I 11l1I"II,\ II()." .\j{)., III III 11,1'.1) H{)\ P(', l 11,\1<1 ()TIIS"'IJ.I.J, \'A 22'IOl A high priority is to obtain ISTEA (Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act) enhancement funding for the project. As we understand the act, an especially relevant section provides grants for transportation enhancement projects such as "facilities for bicycles and pedestrians," "acquisition of scenic easements and scenic sites," "historic preservation," and" landscaping and other scenic beautification" -- all of which will be ingredients of our conceptual plan. We also understand that, in Virginia, the Federal enhancement monies are distributed equally to the twenty-two transportation planning districts. We need your guidance about the project as well as your help to guide us through the corridors of relevant governmental agencies to get the ISTEA monies. We also need your support in championing and coordinating this project. The current problems with the road are numerous and obvious. Route 53 is an ordinary highway department road; its gravel shoulders, adjacent grading cuts, concrete drainage ditches, metal guard rails, signs, and general aesthetic ambience suggest a highway in the middle of a commercial strip rather than a parkway leading to the only house in the United States registered as a World Heritage site. Route 53 is also a hazardous road, particularly in the narrow, winding stretch between Michie Tavern and Monticello. The purpose of this letter is simply to communicate our basic goals regarding the Parkway and to request your assistance. The rendered conceptual plan and narrative 1S scheduled to be completed by June 1, 1993, but I'd welcome a chance to meet with you well before then to discuss ISTEA strategy and to get your ideas about the project. I'll be in touch shortly. Sincerely, /'~~ J, ik~ Peter J. Hatch, Director of Gardens & Grounds Chairman, Thomas Jefferson Parkway Committee 979-1489 cc: Dan Jordan 6 ... . VII>GINIA DEPARTHENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1993 SPRING ALLOCATION MEETING FOR THE INTERSTATE. PRIMARY. AND URBAN SYSTEMS. AND FOR MASS TRANSIT ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRIORITIES Th~ following addresses Albemarle County priorities for each allocation of the In ermodal Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and each sub-allocation of th Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. Co~gestion KitiRation and Air Quality Improvement ProRram Th s does not apply to Albemarle County. The County is not in an area of no~attainment for ozone or carbon monoxide. Na ional Highwav System (NDS) Th Charlottesville-Albemarle MPO Technical Committee and Policy Board have apbroved the NHS as proposed by VDOT in this area excluding the Route 29 Bypass. No other NHS designations are recommended. The County's highest pr ority project in the proposed NHS is the widening of Route 29 North from th~ Corporate limits of Charlottesville to Airport Road, including immediate design/acquisition and ultimate construction of interchanges at Greenbrier Dr ve and Hydraulic and Rio Roads. The County seeks active participation in Ro~te 29 Corridor studies, including the upcoming study of the Charlottesville to Warrenton segment of the Corridor. . Su face Transportation Proe:ram (STP) Sa etv Improvements: Se eral projects in the County seem to qualify under this 10% set-aside. They ar , in priority order: 1) The closing of the rema1n1ng Route 29 North crossovers recommended for closure in a VDOT study adopted by the Board of Supervisors on May 10, 1979 and reaffirmed by the Board on November 8, 1989. 2) Improvements to the Route 240 underpass at the CSX Railroad in Crozet. 3) Functional plans for Route 20 North and South for alignment improvements. 4) Analysis of possible safety improvements to Route 250 East from its interchange at 1-64 eastward to the Fluvanna County line. En ancement Proiects: Se eral projects appear to be eligible for enhancement funds. They are, in pr ority order: . 1) Beautification of entrance corridors (particularly Route 29 and Route 250) - landscaping, signage, undergrounding of overhead utilities. 2) Construction of bikeway facilities as prioritized in the Bicycle Plan for the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County (adopted by the Board of Supervisors as a element of the Comprehensive Plan on July 17, 1991). 3) Development of a Thomas Jefferson Parkway along Route 53 from Route 20 to Monticello as recommended in the Blue Ridge Neighborhood Study (amended into the Comprehensive Plan by the Board of Supervisors on September 18, 1991). The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation has requested the County's assistance in pursuing this concept (see attached letter). 4) Development of portions of the Rivanna River Greenway path system. 5) Development of sidewalks/pathways as recommended in Pedestrian Obstacles Study Phase II (1987). 6) Removal of non-conforming billboards. Standard Pro;ects: Beyond aforementioned projects, there are other projects eligible for STP funds not set aside. They are, in priority order: 1) Undertake those Charlottesville Area Transportation Study (CATS) projects eligible for the primary program in sequence as called for in the February 2, 1992 joint resolution between the City, County and University and agreed to by VDOT. In addition to Route 29 improvements already mentioned, construct Meadow Creek Parkway from the Route 250 Bypass to Route 29 North. The first phase of this project will be funded in the County's secondary program. The County believes the parkway will meet the criteria for inclusion in the primary system and wants to work with VDOT staff to evaluate construction of subsequent phases as a primary road if this will accelerate the parkway's completion. VDOT is urged to investigate all possible funding sources to achieve the quickest construction of this vitally important roadway. Projects in the northern urbanized area not eligible for primary funds, but listed in CATS, such as the Hydraulic Road/Route 250 Bypass interchange, should be actively pursued. 2) Undertake road projects parallel to Route 29 which relieve traffic on Route 29. such as the Berkmar Drive completion and the Greenbrier Drive/Seminole Trail connector. concurrent with the Route 29 improvements. , ~ . . . 3) Improve the north/south connection between Route 250 and Route 240 in Crozet, either through an improved alignment of Route 240 from Route 250 northward to Route 810, or construction of the Route 240-Route 250 connector road recommended in the County's Comprehensive Plan. 4) Widen Route 250 West from Emmett Street to Route 637 in Ivy. That portion from Emmett Street to the Route 29/250 Bypass is under joint design study by the City, County and University of Virginia and was recognized for improvement in the Lewis Mountain Neighborhood Study. 5) Develop design plans for the widening of Fontaine Avenue from Jefferson Park Avenue to the improvements being undertaken along the frontage of the University Real Estate Foundation development. 6) Construct an interchange on 1-64 at Avon Street (Route 742). VWCI/blb/jcw .~ g~gii1lll~ ,: >::./:,.' :. ',;., :,'.,~':';: ,'i',i>'-'},:Di~~ .Jf...... f ~,' ,.;',,~'"Il':~"'''. ':..:.. ~.~...,~;.r~~..~. ..., J..t!'I\',........",...:to(~~ ~5.:~::\.:';l~{~j.ii.;~::';::;i:ii,1~~;~;; . . J ~'~I .~ Mr_ Wayne Cilimberg Director- of Planninq and Community Albemarle County Office Building 1\01 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, V^ 22901-4596 ~~} r'J 4'~.\\ :;:'.l'"'\'"';lj', ;~ "r;J ~:... I: ~ J~ ".,I-' ~.". ~ QI \~,.. ,i '] -).i' o v':" ~ 2''7 ~'-.. i"99 2 Development 'J'! U .1 )u. ,. - . ,! ; C)/.. F)' , iannfrJO Dept. Dear Mr. Cilimberg, The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation, Inc. lS currently interviewing landscape architectural firms to develop a rendered conceptual plan and narrative for a section of the Thomas Jefferson Parkway, the 1.6 mile section of Route 53 from KOLi. t.e 20 to t.hE: ;.1ont ice 110 entrance. Tlte purpose of this plan is to suggest the possibilities of a Parkway and to serve as a basis to raise funding, whether private or governmental, for its implementation. The County's Comprehensive Plan, as amended by the "Blue Ridge Neighborhood study" (June, 1991, prepared by your department), outlines the just i fica t ion and i mplementa t ion f or a "Parkway to Monticelloll which would "allow for safe and efficient traffic movement and preserve the rural character of the area. II The Foundation hopes, as well, to create a scenic, landscaped road to lend credence to the name change; to develop a parkway spanning a picturesque, rural setting on the way to one of this country's most signi f icant h istor ica 1 properties. We feel a parkway is more than a road, but a linear park with a roadway within it. The George Washington Parkway, the Blue Ridge Parkway, and the Colonial Parkway are the models we have in mind. The recent acquisition of 105 acres adjacent to Route 53 has inspired the Foundation to take the initial steps to make the concept of the parkway a tangible reality and to want to work with the County toward that goal. (111)\\ \"1 III II H_"d)~ .\11 ,\lUIU,\! I (II I,"" !):\ 110." :'\10....... Ill) II n, 1',U B()\. \I(), lll..\Hl UT', L~\'IJIL, \'/\ 22<}02 ". . A high priority is to obtain ISTEA (Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act) enhancement funding for the project. As we understand the act, an especially relevant section provides grants for transportation enhancement projects such as "facilities for bicycles and pedestrians," "acquisition of scenic easements and scenic sites," "historic preservation," and" landscaping and other scenic beautification" -- all of which will be ingredients of our conceptual plan. We also understand that, in Virginia, the Federal enhancement monies are distributed equally to the twenty-two transportation planning districts. We need your guidance about the project as well as your help to guide us through the corridors of relevant governmental agencies to get the ISTEA monies. We also need your support in championing and coordinating this project. The current problems with the road are numerous and obvious. Route 53 is an ordinary highway department road; its gravel shoulders, adjacent grading cuts, concrete drainage ditches, metal guard rails, signs, and general aesthetic ambience suggest a highway in the middle of a commercial strip rather than a parkway leading to the only house in the United States registered as a World Heritage Site. Route 53 is also a hazardous road, particularly in the narrow, winding stretch between Michie Tavern and Monticello. The purpose of this letter is simply to communicate our basic goals regarding the Parkway and to request your assistance. The rendered conceptual plan and narrative ~s scheduled to be completed by June 1, 1993, but I'd welcome a chance to meet with you well before then to discuss ISTEA strategy and to get your ideas about the project. I'll be in touch shortly. . . Sincerely, /1"10 J. /klv1 Peter J. Hatch, Director of Gardens & Grounds Chairman, Thomas Jefferson Parkway Committee 979-1489 cc: Dan Jordan - ~ . COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA John G. illiken Secretary f Transportation Office of the Governor Richmond 23219 March 12, 1993 (804) 786-8032 TOO (804) 786-7765 C C) ti r.~ .r--/ () F f'" ~? ;:.. \.,~ .:\ r~ L_l:~ .. ~ , : ,., j.'-.J '! 99 j ,-, ..;' '.".-......, iJ t::UMW OF '-;UPCF\;; ;; ounty Boards of Supervisors Board Member: As I am sure you are aware, the annual process of updating he Six-Year Improvement Program is under way~ Preallocation earings are being held throughout the State in March and early pril. The Commonwealth Transportation Board will make its ecision on the tentative allocations on May 20. Two final earings will be held on June 10, with final approval scheduled or June 24. The 1993 General Assembly adopted changes to ensure that irginia complies with the federal Intermodal Surface ransportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). The following rovisions were enacted for fiscal year 1993-94: 1. Funds apportioned under federal law to the National Highway System (NHS) shall be treated, for State formulae purposes, as interstate funds, pursuant to 533.1-23.1 of the Code of Virginia; and, 2. Funds apportioned under federal law for Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) improvement shall be allo~ated to designated transportation projects in clean air non-attainment areas of the Commonwealth in addition to funds allocated to these areas pursuant to 533.1-23.1; and, 3. Funds apportioned under federal law for the Surface Transportation Program (STP) shall be distributed and administered in accordance with federal requirements, as follows: a. Ten percent shall be set aside for a statewide safety program, with grants made on a competitive basis; b. Ten percent shall be set aside for a statewide enhancement program, with grants made on a competitive basis; c. Fifty percent shall be allocated on the basis of population, as prescribed by federal law; d. Thirty percent shall be allocated pursuant to S33.1-23.1 of the Code of Virginia. 4. Federal requirements shall be followed regarding that portion of the Equity funds apportioned to the Commonwealth that are to be allocated on the basis of population. Such equity funds include the minimum allocation, hold harmless, reimbursement, payments guarantee and donor state bonus categories under federal law. 5. The balance of Equity funds apportioned to the Commonwealth shall be allocated to eligible projects at the discretion of the Commonwealth Transportation Board. 6. Secondary road and urban construction funds allocated pursuant to S33.1-23.1 .B(2) and B(3) may be utilized on any project eligible under Title 23 united States Code Section 133, upon request of the local governing body and approval of the Commonwealth Transportation Board. 7. Federal funds provided to the National Highway System, Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality categories as well as the required Stat~ matching funds may be allocated by the Commonwealth Transportation Board for transit purposes under the same rules and conditions authorized by federal law. Attached is a table which shows the tentative Six-Year d stribution of state and federal revenues, taking into account tle aforementioned language. Funds for the interstate and n(~ninterstate NHS are set aside before any further distribution ((~ff the top). CMAQ funds are set aside for the three urban n(~n-attainment areas in regional accounts. The funds for the sl~ecial federal demonstration projects are set aside as required b' federal law. Under the Surface Transportation Program, funding is p ovided for the enhancement and safety programs. Also shown are tle funds to be allocated to the three urbanized areas over 2( 0,000 population and the statewide allocation for discretionary p ojects selected by the Board. Primary allocations represent a 40% share of the funds a ailable for formula distribution. Urban allocations represent (1) a 30% share of the funds a ailable for formula distribution to all urban areas, and (2) t e population distribution of STP funds to urban areas excluding t ose within the three urpanized areas over 200,000 population. Second~ allocations represent (1) a 30% share of the funds a ailable for formula distribution to all counties, and (2) the p pulation distribution of STP funds to counties excluding those w'thin the three urbanized areas over 200,000 population. STP funds allocated to any system.of highways are not l'mited to systems, but may be allocated to any improvements on a_y system for any purpose specified in the federal STP program. i prior concurrence of the Commonwealth Transportation Board is o tained. Assistance for mass transit from the Highway Maintenance and o erating Fund and the Transportation Trust Fund is set out a cording to current law. Unpaved road funds continue to be distributed to counties sed upon the procedures contained in current law. If you compare the qollars available to last year's e timates, you will observe that the amounts available for f rmula distribution are reduced. This is a result of several f deral requirements: (1) the legislated set asides for safety a d enhancements, (2) the direct STPallocation to urbanized a eas over 200,000 population in regional accounts and the other a eas of the state, (3) the statewide. discretionary allocations, a d (4) provision of state match in certain categories. Of particular interest is the process involving the STP f nds being distributed to the counties, cities, and towns, and w'thin the three urbanized areas over 200,000 population, to the M tropolitan Planning Organizations. Project selection is d legated to the appropriate local government and/or regional . e tity, with appropriate consultation or cooperation from the S ate. For use in project selection, I am attaching an extract f om ISTEA which describes the types of projects eligible for STP f nding. As you can see, implementing the provisions of ISTEA will p esent many challenges to you as well as the Commonwealth T ansportation Board. We welcome this opportunity to work with e ch of you toward our mutual goal of improving transportation in t e Commonwealth. Sincerely, ~C~~~ Deputy Secretary of Transportation c Commonwealth Transportation Board Members County Administrators ~ i 08 8 i 0088 0 C\/ ,... 8 8 al 2_ ,... ~- al >- 80 O. ii"'lD 11)_ C\/ al_ - LI. ~~- - al- al- ",- ~ - ~ co ,...- II) l8 :g ~~~~ C\/ ,... ~ ~ _al ale 0 - al_ ~~ a; ""-""-00. - ~. '" ~ N 0 - .,..,.~tt lD "It C\/ ~ al - .,. .,. - - - .,. t; .,. .,. .,. .,. co 08 8 i 0088 0 C\/ ,... 8 8 0 al ~ ,... C\/ 0 >- 80 0- ii"'lD co. 11). co "It co. LI. ~~ - ale a; ",. 11). lD- al "It ale C\/- "It II) ::~~ ,... "It al ~. al - _al 11). o- lD ,...- ,... ,...- ~~ al ""-""-0- 0- :8 ~ co "It 0- '" ... "''''~tt '" C\/ ~ ,... -.,. .,. ... - - .,. ,... .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. ,... 8~ 8 8 00~8 0 ... al 8 8 0 al ~- C\/ ,... 0 >- o. II) ~~ ,... al_ o. 11). al ,.... LI. ~~- - ,..: c\/. N ~ . II) g: ~ - N al :g C\/ ~~i~ II) - al II) _ al" co - '" C\/ C\/ - "'. ~~ a; fS ii== ; co. ~ ~ ale ~ - ~~ - C\/ t; - .,. .,. .,. .- .- -. .,. ~ CI) .,. .,. .,. .,. Z 0 ~ i 08 8 8 0088 8. II) II) 8 8 ~- 8 80 ~~II)"It - m. >- o- Il) '" II) al ::1>- LI. ~~- .- ~ C'i C\/- a; = al . "It ~ ~ II) .11) alalCO,... II) ,... ,... '" "It _al II) co "It "It 0 "It "It. lD 11). lD 0- "'- <a: ~-~ ale fS ii""-""- : 11). ~ N co "It ::1< - ~~ - C\/ ,... - ~::1 - .,. .,. .. - - - .. .,. ~ 8~ .,. .,. .,. .,. a:w G..o :g 8~ 8 8 ii~~ 0 .co C\/ 8 8 Cl- a:- 0 ~. g:- 2 <~ >- o. II) - "It II) ~!< LI. l8N - ,..: al- ale ..: = t II) co 0- 11)- 0 al~ :g C\/ ..OC\/ - al 0 II) ,... co .."'al 0- - "It "'. . o. ><~ :8-~ a; ~- ,...- ,.... co. ~ ~ = (jiCl) ~ ,... - al - ....C\/_ 0 C\/ ,... '" ~ C\/" .. .. .. .. - - - .,. .,. ~ .,. .,. .,. .,. !c ~ Z "It 08 0 8 0080 0 lD "It 0 0 0 ~ al 80 0 00 0 g- co - 0 0 0 >- 0 II) alalOIt) O. co_ o ,... "It. LI. al- C\/' C\/- lIi al- al- o. ",- '" - . . a; It) ~~ al C\/ ...co CD '" al ~ al C\/ . ,.... ..,...,... C\/. C\/. - .. co_ al- ,.... al- lD ,.... ti .- -' ~ '" al - . ,... -- - ~ .,. ~~ - '" C\/ t; "It C\/.,. .,. - - - .,. ~ .,. . .,. .,. .,. .,. ::I ~ C!' 0 a: ui Cl. "0 Z C ~ 0 u.. ~ C E CI) .2 III J: ~ oiG w S Cl)Z ~S 8_~ u rn J:!! Z ~ ~ ZIll Z Cl.C 0- ~ ~ 'C Cl)CD ~< <( Z -- 0 Z E CD 0 CD rn ~ S!2 0 ~ - .... ;:2 CD '0 f= III CD U ^.- >- CI) ~ "3 C') ~-- ~C~rn~ U co c: a: CI) w CT C7l <iDe call1cuS <( W 0'1 :J .... wJ::-IllCU < C C rn a: ....-0 CI) ucca....- >- c w != ~ III N .... CI)':z z <WCl)<CI) a: z z ~ CI) "0 CI) a: " 0 ~ < <( 0 z ~ .c Z ~ <( ~ ::a: .... 13 lD U Cl. ;:2 <( u 0 Z ~ W ::::l c: a: w z .... E ~ (,,) (,,) 0 CI) Cl. ::::l CI) ::::l .... CI) . :::!: , ~ 133~ surJ~ce Transportation Program . .. .... . > Eligible Projects A state may obligate funds apportioned to it under aection 104{b) (3) for the s~rface transpdrtation program only for the fpllowing: (1) Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, and operational improvements for highways (including Interstate highways) and bridges (including bridges on public roads of all functional classifications), including any such construction or reconstruction necessary to accommodate other transportation modes, and including the seismic retrofit and painting of and application of calcium magnesium acetate on bridges and approaches thereto and other elevated structures, mitigation of damage to wildlife, habitat, and ecosystems caused by a transportation project funded under this title. (2) Capital costs for transit projects eligible for assistance under the Federal Transit Act and publicly owned intracity or intercity bus terminals and facilities. (3) Carpool projects, fringe and corridor parking facilities and programs, and bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways in accordance with section 217. (4) Highway and transit safety improvements and programs, hazard eliminations, projects to mitigate hazards caused by wildlife, and railway-highway grade crossings. (5) Highway and transit research and development and technology transfer programs. (6) Capital and operating costs for traffic monitoring, management, and control facilities and programs. (7) Surface transportation planning programs. (8) Transportation enh~ncement activities. (9) Transportation control measures listed in section I08(f) (1) (A) (other than clauses (xii) and (xvi)) of the Clean Air Act. (~O) Development and establishment of management systems under section 303. (~1) In accordance with all applicable Federal law and regulations, participation in wetlands mitigation efforts related to projects funded under this title, which may include participation in wetlands mitigation banks; contributions to statewide and regional efforts to conserve, restore, enhance and create wetlands; and development of statewide and regional wetlands conservation and mitigation plans, including any such banks, efforts, and plans authorized pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (including crediting provisions). Contributions to such mitigation efforts may take place concurrent with or in advance of project construction. contributions toward these efforts may occur in advance of project construction only if such efforts are consistent with all applicable requirements of Federal law and regulations and state transportation. planning processes. Generally, projects may not be undertaken on roads 'f~nctionally classified as local or rural minor collectors, u~less such roads are on a Federal-aid highway system on January 1, 1991, and except as approved by the Secretary. ***** D~ST~~::UTr;D i .~ ._'''<3~:f)~5 0>1 _3~~~:L~i-,,3 __~'.". County of Albemarle EXECUTIVE SUMMAR Y AGENDA ITLE: Commonw alth Transportation Board Primary Road Pr -allocation Hearing March 10, 1993 ((j C~'i(.'~~ I INFORMATION: SUBJECT Propose present on Marc ACTION: X CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: STAFF C Messrs. Brandenburger, Cilimberg REVIEWED BY: ATTACHMENTS: BACK allo proj Culp al10 prog new inpu High proj ROUND: The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) is conducting their annual pre- ation hearings on Interstate, Primary and Urban Systems, and for Mass Transit cts. The culpeper District hearing is at 10:00 a.m. on March 26, 1993 in the per District Office. The purpose of the hearing is to solicit input on the ation of fiscal year 1993-1994 funds and on updating the Six-Year Improvement am. Past submittals have focused on the primary road system. As a result of the ntermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), the CTB is requesting and recommendations in two areas that affect Albemarle County; the National ay System (NHS) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP) which includes safety cts, enhancement projects, and other primary projects. The attached staff report provides recommendation and comments regarding HS and STP. These are consistent with our longstanding priorities and previous reco endations to the CTB. In addition to our primary road projects there is a new sect'on on enhancement projects that is now specifically required under ISTEA. The Metr politan Planning Organization will also be making recommendations to the CTB. Afte your review of staff's recommendations, a second draft will be prepared for your revi w at your March 17th meeting which will include a draft statement for presentation at t e hearing. RECO ATION: Staff recommends and requests your approval of the proposed primary road recommendations. 93.032 ".' "'~:'^U- .:n-~a~'tf6~ ~ '\.::: c~~.-,: ':~. \' CI=--- ~ ~ ,. . :.~s-. l!~L!~' \ '. \ . ," Q .u _~ . i_.~ l'~' '''''TV OF Al '3.,. P"^L\1 C \w\~ ..>1'1 . _ _I~lt'\n;~t;, f'J:l::~JI ~j / .U~'{ ~ if. ~.. "'.;..',,"n=~~...~...-.: ""........--7! I4' " i l ..... ~,., ',," COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 2%-5823 V:' Mr. Bob Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive OM: V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community Development{JtJ~ March 2, 1993 Virginia Department of Transportation 1993 Spring Allocation Meeting for the Interstate, Primary, and Urban Systems, and for Mass Transit his is to respond to the attached package from John Milliken. It is provided or the Board of Supervisor's consideration. I will address each allocation f the Intermodal Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and each sub- llocation of the Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. Miti ation and Air rovement Pro ram apply to Albemarle County. The County is not in an area of for ozone or carbon monoxide. his has been previously discussed by the Board of Supervisors. Both the MPO echnical Committee and Policy Board have approved the NHS as proposed by VDOT 'n this area excluding the Route 29 Bypass (see attached map). The Policy oard has reserved the opportunity to come back to this issue after more omp1ete information about the implications of NHS is available. Staff ecommends no other NHS designations. The County's highest priority project 'n the proposed NHS is the widening of Route 29 North from the Corporate imits of Charlottesville to the South Fork Rivanna River, including cquisition and ultimate construction of interchanges at Greenbrier Drive and draulic and Rio Roads. The County should also seek active participation in oute 29 Corridor studies, including the upcoming study of the Charlottesville o 1-66 segment of the Corridor. r. Bob Brandenburger age 3 arch 2, 1993 y group/individual may initiate enhancement projects, but they must be e dorsed and submitted by a local jurisdiction or public agency with propriate MPO endorsement. An application must be completed for funding consideration. A minimum 20% local match of total project cost is required, ich may come from public or private sources. If the project is within VDOT ight-of-way, this match may come from VDOT road funds. Funding is competitive - applications statewide will be evaluated and selected from one 001. Final application forms are not yet available. Deadline for plication is July 1, 1993. Several projects previously identified or requested appear to be eligible for e ancement funds. They are, in staff's priority order: 1) Beautification of entrance corridors (particularly Route 29 and Route 250) - landscaping, signage, undergrounding of overhead utilities. 2) Construction of bikeway facilities as prioritized in the Bicycle Plan for the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County (adopted by the Board of Supervisors as a element of the Comprehensive Plan on July 17, 1991). 3) Development of a Thomas Jefferson Parkway along Route 53 from Route 20 to Monticello as recommended in the Blue Ridge Neighborhood Study (amended into the Comprehensive Plan by the Board of Supervisors on September 18, 1991). The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation has requested the County's assistance in pursuing this concept (see attached letter). 4) Development of portions of the Rivanna River Greenway path system. 5) Development of sidewalks/pathways as recommended in Pedestrian Obstacles Study Phase II (1987). 6) Removal of non-conforming billboards. e County's priorities for enhancement funds will be presented to the MPO for i corporation into this year's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Mr. Bob Brandenburger Eage 4 March 2, 1993 Standard Proiects: Beyond these projects mentioned, there are other projects eligible for STP f~nds not set aside that have traditionally been requested by the County as part of the primary plan allocation process. They are, in staff's priority order: 1) Undertake those Charlottesville Area Transportation Study (CATS) projects eligible for the primary program in sequence as called for in the February 2, 1992 joint resolution between the City, County and University and agreed to by VDOT. In addition to Route 29 improvements already mentioned, construct Meadow Creek Parkway from the Route 250 Bypass to Route 29 North. The first phase of this project will be funded in the County's secondary program. The County believes the parkway will meet the criteria for inclusion in the primary system and wants to work with VDOT staff to evaluate construction of subsequent phases as a primary road if this will accelerate the parkway's completion. 2) Improve the north/south connection between Route 250 and Route 240 in Crozet, either through an improved alignment of Route 240 from Route 250 northward to Route 810, or construction of the Route 240-Route 250 connector road recommended in the County's Comprehensive Plan. 3) Widen Route 250 West from Emmett Street to Route 637 in Ivy. That portion from Emmett Street to the Route 29/250 Bypass is under joint design study by the City, County and University of Virginia and was recognized for improvement in the Lewis Mountain Neighborhood Study. 4) Develop design plans for the widening of Fontaine Avenue from Jefferson Park Avenue to the improvements being undertaken along the frontage of the University Real Estate Foundation development. 5) Construct an interchange on 1-64 at Avon Street (Route 742). VWC/blb/jcw c~: Marcia Joseph Peter J. Hatch Nancy O'Brian JOHN G. MI LIKEN CHAIRMA " ~,.,~;..-o/3 ~ . '... I t' -'._ t.: C : \ : .~ :' ,t { It. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIAi,~J;:.c~::r.;j)~.~~r-. ez/A r':\\ FfS 19 199) 11 I COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD I ~., '. . ,I! , I, 1401 EAST BROAD STREET . . ,/ i'!: RICHMOND, 23219.. " ; :', i..::!J February 16, 1993 :"''';..::''' ,'> ';:'; 1'-;: (J\,"-:,,:,-,r.e', .'.~'l- ........ >".1 I ,"-," ~ '""v l~ ...;,-: ."..... "..~~,:.... ..i>' I~ d !:)" ;~:tiji~~) B()~ FYI 1-5 1993 Spring preallocation Hearings for the Interstate, Primary, and Urban Systems, and for Mass Transit C unty Boards of Supervisors D ar Board Member: Your active participation in the preallocation hearing process in previous years has been invaluable to the Commonwealth Transportation Board in the selection and setting of construction priorities. Under the new federal legislation, your participation ecomes even more important because of the fundamental changes t at have occurred in the federal/state relationship. The Board has again scheduled a series of preallocation earings, as indicated on the attached list. We look forward to our advice and comments on both the allocation of fiscal year 1993-94 funds and on updating the Six-Year Improvement Program to eflect anticipated future funding through fiscal years 1998-99. The Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), enacted by Congress in 1991, has required a number of hanges with the laws of the Commonwealth governing the allocation f transportation funds. Last year, the General Assembly provided 'nterim legislative guidance on the use of federal funds, and in 993 the modified language, currently under consideration by the eneral Assembly, will bring even more changes. The major federal funding categories we would like you to ddress are outlined on attachment #2. As in the past years, we will focus on the federal categories nd the. Interstate, Primary, Urban, and Mass Transit Systems. earings for secondary projects occur at other times. You are cordially invited s your schedule will permit. s many of the hearings ttachment y: The Honorable Lawrence Douglas Wilder Commonwealth Transportation Board Mr. Leo J. Bevon County Administrators TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY District Frecericksburg SaIl m Suf olk (wi 1 be divided in 0 three php.ses) Sta~ton Ricihmond eu peper No thern Virginia .. ... Br stol (w 11 be divided il1to three ptlases) Lypchburg S C BED U L E 1993 Spring Preallocation Bearings Location Tappahannock/Essex Fire Department Route 627 (Airport Road), approx. 0.4 mile west of Route 17 in Tappahannock District Office Harrison Avenue north of Main Street and east of VA 311 in Salem District Office 1700 North Main Street (Route 460) City of Suffolk Augusta County Government Center Route 11 - Verona District Office Pine Forest Drive off Route 1, one mile north of Colonial Heights District Office Route 15, 0.5 mile south of Route 3 in Culpeper Fairfax City Hall Ci ty of Fairfax Virginia Highlands Community College Route 372, which intersects with Route 140, 0.5 mile north of 1-81 at Exit 7 in Abingdon District Office Route 501, 0.26 mile south of intersection Routes 460 and 501 south of Lynchburg Date March 15 March 16 March 22 March 23 March 24 March 26 March 31 April 2 April 5 Time 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. Beginning at 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. Beginning at 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. Attachment 2 COMPLiANCE WITH ISTEA. ., .. ......... PROPOSED STATE B UDGET AMENDMENT On December 18, 1991, President Bush signed the Intermodal T ansportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), which changed the course transportation funding for the nation. Virginia's existing location statute could accommodate prior law, but there were eas of conflict between ISTEA and existing statute. VDOT was the same time performing an analysis of the allocation rmula, SJR 188, and it was the consensus of the General sembly and VDOT that major changes should be avoided until the 188 study results could be properly considered by the sembly. As a result, the 1992 General Assembly enacted two t mporary budget amendments, allowing VDOT to treat the National H'ghway System (NHS) like interstate funds and setting aside the C ngestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds for d'stribution only to nonattainment areas. This year the General Assembly has received the initial port for the SJR 188 study. These recommendations call for a udy by the Assembly prior to implementation. In the interim, vernor Wilder gave permission for VDOT to request a budget endment, which would temporarily enact the SJR 188 findings ecifically relating to full compliance with ISTEA. This commendation continues the previously approved distributions r the NHS and CMAQ and also provides for the federally mandated s ballocations of the Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. + Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) - Provides funding for transportation projects to reduce air pollution in areas that are in nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide. These federal monies are set aside prior to statutory distribution, and are attributed directly to the three nonattainment areas. The Metropolitan Planning Organization selects the projects to be funded. Projects may involve highways or other transportation modes. Required matching funds are p~ovided from the regular allocation to the system or mode receiving the federal funds. . National Highway System (NHS) - Congress is establishing a 155,000 mile NHS to succeed the Interstate System. The new system will contain all interstate routes, some other principal arterials, and intermodal connectors. VDOT has completed the required functional classification, and has forwarded the draft results to local governments and regional transportation agencies. Following this review, a recommended system for Virginia will be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration this summer. The Congress will adopt a final system by September 30, 1995. In Virginia the NHS funds are treated like interstate funds. They are set aside prior to the statutory distribution, and required state matching funds are taken off-the-top. · Surface Transportation Program (STP) - The most flexible of the new federal programs is the STP. These monies may be used for improvements on any transportation mode, and can be reassigned from highways to the other modes without going through a lengthy federal approval process. There are required federal set asides, and suballocations. Ten percent of the STP apportionment must be used for safety improvements. These involve improving conditions at hazardous locations and constructing grade separations at some rail-highway crossings and installing gates and flashing lights at the other crossings. This portion of the STP program replaces the federal safety program. Federal funds will no longer pass through the statutory formula, enabling the State to implement identified projects more rapidly. A second ten percent of the STP apportionment is set aside for enhancement projects. A list of the ten specific project types is established. These projects enhance the physical environment, and allow the State to do more than would normally be done on a proposed project. An enhancement may also be accomplished as a stand-alone venture, although it must relate to a transportation mode and meet the eligibility criteria. The Commonwealth Transportation Board is developing a brochure to more fully describe the program and solicit project recommendations. This will be available following budget approval by the General Assembly and the public involvement process for the program design. Federal funds will be set aside prior to the statutory distribution. Federal law requires that 50% of the STP funds be suballocated according to population. Within areas over 200,000 population, the available funds are attributed to the MPO for project selection, in cooperation with VDOT. Federal law also mandates the aggregate amount that must be obligated in rural areas. The budget amendment being considered by the General Assembly will assign the federally mandated amount for each area. Within areas of over 200,000 population, the aggregate amounts are attributed to the MPOs; in other areas, allocations are made directly to the counties, cities, and towns. The remaining thirty percent of the STP apportionment is titled IIstate flexiblell. The Board's recommendation, which is under consideration by the General Assembly, would continue to pass these funds through the statutory distribution. . Equity Adjustment Categories - Federal allocation law does not return to each state the exact proportion of monies that it pays in user fees and taxes. Some states, like Virginia, pay in more taxes than are returned. In recognition of this fact, and in order to minimize the impact, Congress implemented a series of equity adjustments designed to return to each state at least 90% of their payments. Each of the five equity adjustments has slightly different distribution criteria, but all complement portions of the STP. within the recommended budget amendment, half of the apportionments available to Virginia are distributed in accordance with the federal STP formula. The other half is distributed to the NHS or other highway and/or transit projects at the discretion of the Board. . Budget status - The General Assembly is expected to adopt a final budget prior to its adjournment on February 27. until final action by the Assembly, VDOT's recommendations remain tentative, under consideration but not accepted. Once the budget is enacted, VDOT will know which recommendations are approved, and which have been further adjusted or denied. * * * * ... Mr. Wayne cilimberg Director of Planning and community Albemarle County Office Building 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596 R ~: f'?' l': "ti~;: J~ Ncfv":" t17~"Y92 Development Ut.L U 1 1992 Planning Dept. Dear Mr. Cilimberg, The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation, Inc. is currently interviewing landscape architectural firms to develop a rendered conceptual plan and narrative for a section of the Thomas Jefferson Parkway, the 1.6 mile section of Route 53 from Route 20 to thE: r'1onticello entrance. The purpose of this plan is to suggest the possibilities of a Parkway and to serve as a basis to raise funding, whether private or governmental, for its implementation. The County's Comprehensive Plan, as amended by the "Blue Ridge Neighborhood study" (June, 1991, prepared by your department), outlines the justification and implementation for a "Parkway to Monticello" which would "allow for safe and efficient traffic movement and preserve the rural character of the area." The Foundation hopes, as well, to create a scenic, landscaped road to lend credence to the name change; to develop a parkway spannlng a picturesque, rural setting on the way to one of this country's most signif icant historical properties. We feel a parkway is more than a road, but a linear park with a roadway within it. The George Washington Parkway, the Blue Ridge Parkway, and the Colonial Parkway are the models we have in mind. The recent acquisition of 105 acres adjacent to Route 53 has inspired the Foundation to take the initial steps to make the concept of the parkway a tangible reality and to want to work with the County toward that goal. TIIOMAS JEFFERSON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION, MONTICELLO, P,O, BOX 316, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 A high priority is to obtain ISTEA (Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act) enhancement funding for the project. As we understand the act, an especially relevant section provides grants for transportation enhancement proj ects such as "facilities for bicycles and pedestrians, " "acquisi tion of scenic easements and scenic sites," "historic preservation," and" landscaping and other scenic beautification" -- all of which will be ingredients of our conceptual plan. We also understand that, in Virginia, the Federal enhancement monies are distributed equally to the twenty-two transportation planning districts. We need your guidance about the project as well as your help to guide us through the corridors of relevant governmental agencies to get the ISTEA monies. We also need your support in championing and coordinating this project. The current problems with the road are numerous and obvious. Route 53 is an ordinary highway department road; its gravel shoulders, adjacent grading cuts, concrete drainage ditches, metal guard rails, signs, and general aesthetic ambience suggest a highway in the middle of a commercial strip rather than a parkway leading to the only house in the united States registered as a World Heritage site. Route 53 is also a hazardous road, particularly in the narrow, winding stretch between Michie Tavern and Monticello. The purpose of this letter is simply to communicate our basic goals regarding the Parkway and to request your assistance. The rendered conceptual plan and narrative 1S scheduled to be completed by June 1, 1993, but I'd welcome a chance to meet with you well before then to discuss ISTEA strategy and to get your ideas about the project. I'll be in touch shortly. Sincerely,' / : I ).t!;;; J I*-'/vt, Peter J. Hatch, Director of Gardens & Grounds Chairman, Thomas Jefferson Parkway Committee 979-1489 cc: Dan Jordan NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM LEGEND f' ot~ ,\C!JC!J~ ~~, ~et ~ ece . o . , URBANIZED BOUNDARY rnmm REQUIRED NHS FACILITIES .,~ OTHER NHS FACILITIES ~ .. -.,.- . SCALE 1 MILES I "l' ~ ~ ~ ~. .....,,'" ~ CHARLOTTESVILLE URBANIZED AREA