Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201500019 Review Comments Special Use Permit 2015-04-24• ^�- 11�illr IlIIf1.�• COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 MEMORANDUM TO: Rachel Falkenstein, Senior Planner FROM: Margaret Maliszewski, Principal Planner RE: SP- 2015 -19: UVA Indoor Golf Practice Facility DATE: April 24, 2015 I have reviewed the information submitted for the above - referenced application and I have the following comments. Regarding impacts on historic resources: Birdwood was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 2003. The Virginia Department of Historic Resources has determined that if the proposed work is executed as shown, it will not impact the listing of Birdwood in the Register (listed under Criterion C for Architecture). The map included with the nomination shows a boundary that does not include the location of the new golf facility. DHR has also commented that there may be potential for archaeological sites in the construction area, particularly field slave quarter buildings originally situated away from the main house and closer to fields. Such resources could have archaeological significance. DHR recommends caution as the project moves forward. More specific recommendation from DHR's Regional Office Archaeologist was requested but not received. 1937 aerial photographs show a structure or other object standing in the location of the house that is to be removed, at the west corner of the building to be constructed. DHR has approved the removal of this house. It is likely that construction of this house disturbed any archaeological resources in the immediate area. Historic aerial photos show no other site features evident in the vicinity of the proposed location of the new building. Nevertheless, staff supports DHR's recommendation for caution regarding potential archaeological resources as the project moves forward. Regarding Entrance Corridor impacts: The perspective views of the proposed building suggest that it is consistent with the Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines. However, the topography of the site and the location of existing wooded areas suggest that the proposed building will not be visible from the Entrance Corridor street. If the building is determined to be visible, a Certificate of Appropriateness will be required. Given the distance from the street, the proposal is eligible for staff level review as a County -wide Certificate of Appropriateness. Final determinations regarding visibility and type of Entrance Corridor review required can be made at the site plan review stage.