HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-07-14
FIN A L
July 14, 1993
7:00 P.M., Meeting Room #7
Second Floor, County Office Building
1) Ca 1 to Order.
2) PlEdge of Allegiance.
3) MOll ent of Silence.
4) Otter Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) Cor sent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) P~lic Rearing on Secondary Road Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 1993-94.
7) P~lic Rearing to consider requests for funding under the Commonwealth of Virginia's
Transportation Enhancement Program. The Keswick Garden Club, Archibald Craige
and Robert Hamon are requesting $68,800 for screening of the CSX rail siding
and yard on Route 22 at Keswick, Virginia. The Thomas Jefferson Memorial
Foundation is requesting $3,668,488 in two phases ($2,376,392 in Phase I) for
improvements to the Thomas Jefferson Parkway (Route 53) from Route 20 to the
entrance at Monticello. All non-Federal matching funds for each project will
be provided from private sources.
8) Z~-93-07. Forest Lakes Associates. Public Rearing to rezone 2.3 ac from R-1 to PUD
& 2.6 ac from PUD to R-1 to facilitate the exchange of land between Forest
Lakes South PUD (ZMA-91-04) & adjacent property. Located in eastern portion
of development (Blk C). TM46,Ps26E&26F. Rivanna Dist. (Property is located
in designated growth area.)
9) SP 93-15. Ram/BSE Communications (applicant), Crown Orchard Company (owner). Public
Rearing for an approx 300 ft tower located on Carter's Mtn zoned RA.
TM91,P28. scottsville Dist. (Property is not located in designated growth
area. )
10) Reconsideration of SP-93-06. Thomas Cato, Inc. (applicant); Greenbrier Square
Limited Partnership (owner). Public Rearing to amend SP-91-43 to allow food &
alcohol sales at a billiard center. Property in Greenbrier Square which is on
N side of Greenbrier Dr W of Rt 29 N is zoned HC. TM61W,P5,Sec 1,Blk A.
Charlottesville Dist. (Property is located in designated growth area.)
11) Reconsideration of ZMA-92-13. George & William Clark. Public Rearing to rezone
appro x 102.89 ac from RA to VR (proffered). Property in SE corner of inters
of Red Hill School Rd & North Garden Lane (Rts 760/712). site located in
designated growth area (North Garden Village is recommended for village use (1
du/ac). TM87P57C&66-76; TM99,P109-116. Samuel Miller Dist.
12) Z~-92-14. Wendell Wood. Public Rearing to rezone approx 57 acs from RA to R-15
(Proffered). Property on E sd of Rt 606 approx 0.6 mi S of Rt 649. Site is
in a designated growth area (Community of Hollymead) & is recommended for high
density residential (10.01 to 34 du/ac) in the Comprehensive Plan. TM32,
Ps50,53,54,55&56. The following additional parcels are affected by the
proposed road network: TM32,Ps42A,42B,42C,42D,42E,44,45&TM46,P5 to remain
zoned Rural Areas with proffers. Rivanna Dist.
13) SP 93-13. United Land Corporation. Public Rearing to establish mobile home park on
approx 57 acs under ZMA-92-14. See description above.
14) Z~-93-06. United Land Corporation. Public Rearing to rezone 7.9 acs from RA to HC
(Proffered) located on W sd of Rt 29 approx 600 ft S of Timberwood Blvd. Site
is located in a designated growth area (Community of Hollymead) & is
recommended for regional service in the comprehensive Plan, TM32,Ps43&43A.
The following additional parcels are affected by the proposed road network:
TM32,Ps42A,42B,42C,42D,42E,44,45&TM46,P5 to remain zoned Rural Areas with
proffers. Rivanna Dist.
15) SP 93-14. United Land Corporation. Public Rearing to establish outdoor storage &
display & sales of mobile homes on 7.9 ac zoned RA & EC (See ZMA-93-06 above).
Property on W sd of Rt 29 approx 600 ft S of Timberwood Blvd. TM32,Ps43&43A.
Rivanna Dist.
16) Dilcussion: Revenue Sharing Projects (deferred from July 7, 1993).
17) Aplroval of Minutes: April 1, April 8 and October 14, 1992; and February 17, 1993.
18) Otler Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
19) Ad ourn.
I
CON S E N T
AGENDA
FOR INF(RMATION:
5.1 LEtter dated June 30, 1993, from Nelson J. Shaw, Area Forester, Department of
Fcrestry, concerning outbreak of Southern Pine Bark Beetle in Albemarle County.
5.2 Ccpies of Planning Commission minutes for June 8, June 15 (amended) and June 29,
1~93.
5.3 Nctice dated June 30, 1993, from the State corporation Commission of an application
f'led by Virginia Electric and Power Company for approval of Peak Day Pricing
P'lot - Rider K.
5.4 Ccpy of the Final Allocation of Funds for Fiscal Year 1993-94 for the Interstate,
Plimary, Urban and Secondary Highway Systems, Public Transit, Ports and Airports,
ircluding the Six Year Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 1993-94 thru 1998-99.
5.5 Mtmorandum dated July 9, 1993 from Forrest D. Kerns, Charlottesville Rousing
Fcundation, to Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, David Benish, Chief of
Ccmmunity Development, re: Update on Crozet Crossing.
.
Edward H. B in, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvi Ie
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
TE:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning & Community Development
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC e>>JV
July 15, 1993
BJECT:
Board Actions from Meeting of July 14, 1993
Following is a list of the Board's actions from its extremely long
eting of July 14, 1993:
Item 5.1. Letter dated June 30, 1993, from Nelson J. Shaw, Area
rester, Department of Forestry, concerning outbreak of Southern Pine Bark
etle in Albemarle County. Concerning this item, Mrs. Humphris asked for a
port on what the County is doing on its own land about the outbreak of the
ne park beetle. Mr. Tucker suggested that on August 4 an extension agent
me to the meeting to explain what is happening.
Item 5.4. Copy of the Final Allocation of Funds for Fiscal Year 1993-94
r the Interstate, Primary, Urban and Secondary Highway Systems, Public
ansit, Ports and Airports, including the Six Year Improvement Program for
scal Years 1993-94 through 1998-99. Concerning this item, Mrs. Humphris
ked about a figure on Page 54 of the report titled "Route 29 Albemarle
terchanges" showing an amount of $26 million for right-of-way and a total of
9.1 million. Mrs. Humphris said the complete total was given in the FEIS as
proximately $29 million. She asked what that figure means. Mr. Bowerman
id the answer to that question will be included on the consent agenda next
ek.
Mrs. Humphris also mentioned Page 56, an item showing the Charlottes-
v'lle McIntire Road/Meadow Creek Parkway at a total at $9.961 million for one-
lf mile of road construction from the Route 250 Bypass to Rio Road at the
rthern City Limits. Mr. Roosevelt said the City portion of the project has
en shortened to start from the Route 250 Bypass and for some reason, the
r port may show the figure for the full length. He will get an answer to this
estion.
Mrs. Humphris asked if there will be an interchange at the bypass. Mr.
R osevelt said this estimate may include an interchange; he is not familiar
w'th what is included in this estimate. Mr. Bain said he would like to know
a out this also.
*
Printed on recycled paper
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
July 15, 1993
2)
Agenda Item No.6. Public Rearing on Secondary Road Improvement Budget
Fiscal Year 1993-94. Had only one person speak. Tim Lindstrom asked that
en they get around to paving Route 610, that the paving be stopped at about
o miles off of Route 20 and left in its present condition. It is a lightly
ed road which lies in the Southwest Mountains Historic District, and much of
e land along its perimeter is preserved with conservation easements, etc.
ADOPTED the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Secondary Road Improvement Budget, as
esented.
Agenda Item No.7. Public Rearing to consider requests for funding
der the Commonwealth of Virginia's Transportation Enhancement Program. The
swick Garden Club, Archibald Craige and Robert Hammond are requesting
8,800 for screening of the CSX rail siding and yard on Route 22 at Keswick,
rginia. The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation is requesting $3,668,488
two phases ($2,376,392 in Phase I) for improvements to the Thomas Jefferson
rkway (Route 53) from Route 20 to the entrance at Monticello. All non-
deral matching funds for each project will be provided from private sources.
ADOPTED resolutions approving both the request from the Thomas Jefferson
morial Foundation and the Keswick Garden Club. (Copies attached.)
Agenda Item No.8. ZMA-93-07. Forest Lakes Associates. Public
aring to rezone 2.3 ac from R-1 to PUD & 2.6 ac from PUD to R-1 to facili-
te the exchange of land between Forest Lakes South PUD (ZMA-91-04) &
jacent property. Located in eastern portion of development (Blk C).
46,Ps26E&26F. Rivanna Dist.
APPROVED ZMA-93-07 with existing proffers of ZMA-91-04 to remain in
e fect on the property zoned PUD.
Agenda Item No.9. SP-93-15. Ram/BSE Communications (applicant), Crown
o chard Company (owner). Public Rearing for an approx 300 ft tower located on
C rter's Mtn zoned RA. TM91,P28. Scottsville Dist.
APPROVED with the four conditions of the Planning Commission (No. 3 was
ended from that recommended by the Planning Commission so there could be no
s robe light during daytime hours):
1. Tower heights shall not exceed 300 feet;
2. Compliance with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3. There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a
federal agency. In the event that lighting is required, only red
lighting shall be used for nighttime obstruction marking. No
daylight tower lighting for obstruction purposes is permitted
unless required by a federal agency. All tower lighting shall be
shielded so as to minimize visibility from the ground;
4. Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No adminis-
trative approval shall constitute or imply support for or approval
of the location of additional tower, antennae, etc., even if they
may be part of the same network or system as any antennae adminis-
tratively approved under this section.
M~mo to:
D ~te :
(Page 3)
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
July 15, 1993
Agenda Item No. 10. Reconsideration of SP-93-06. Thomas Cato, Inc.
(~pplicant); Greenbrier Square Limited Partnership (owner). Public Rearing to
~~end SP-91-43 to allow food & alcohol sales at a billiard center. Property
i~ Greenbrier Square which is on N side of Greenbrier Dr W of Rt 29 N is zoned
H~. TM61W,P5,Sec l,Blk A. Charlottesville Dist.
APPROVED SP-93-06 with conditions recommended by the Planning Commission
c~anging No.2 to include a one year reapproval process (issues which may be
c~nsidered will involve police records as well as ABC Board activities).
1. Use shall be limited to 380 Greenbrier Drive;
2. The sale of alcohol shall require reapproval one year from this
approval of the permit by the Board of Supervisors, i.e., July 14,
1994;
3. Hours of operation shall be limited to:
Monday - Thursday
Friday - Saturday
Sunday
10:00 a.m. to 12 midnight
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.
12 noon to 10:00 p.m.
4. Cooperative parking is permitted pursuant to Section 4.12.4.
Agenda Item No. 11. Reconsideration of ZMA-92-13. George & William
C ark. Public Rearing to rezone approx 102.89 ac from RA to VR (proffered).
P operty in SE corner of inters of Red Hill School Rd & North Garden Lane (Rts
710/712). Site located in designated growth area (North Garden Village is
rEcommended for village use (1 du/ac). TM87P57C&66-76; TM99,P109-116. Samuel
M'ller Dist.
APPROVE ZMA-92-13 with the four proffers in a letter dated June 28,
1(93, addressed to Mr. David Bowerman, Chairman, all as set out below:
1. I would like to make the following proffers, conditional upon
rezoning request ZMA-92-13 being approved. These proffers are
substituted for prior proffers made by letters of February 17,
March 3, 1993, draft copy March 16, March 26, April 7, 1993, April
12, 1993, May 13, 1993 and June 8, 1993.
2. The subject property will not be divided into more than 35 build-
ing lots, each being two acres or more, with over 25 acres of the
property left in its natural state. All development will be in
general accord with the same conceptual site plan that has been
submitted for staff's review and comment dated June 28, 1993 and
there will be no development on the road side of the river. The
outer boundaries of the development will be along the flood plain
line so as to preserve the size and location of the natural area.
The owner reserves the right to redesign the location of the
interior road and lot lines to best accommodate 35 or less lots
within the boundaries of the developed area.
3. The main entrance to the subject property will be constructed as
shown on the conceptual site plan for Southern Hills Subdivision,
Architects Brown, EiChman, Dagliesh, Gilpin, and Paxton, dated
June 28, 1993. The entrance will be in accordance with and
approved by the Virginia Department of Transportation. The stream
crossing as shown on the same conceptual site plan and approved by
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
July 15, 1993
4)
SP-93-02 shall be designed in accordance with County, state and
Federal Standards and Regulations. Plans and calculations shall
be submitted to the County Engineering Department for review and
approval prior to construction.
4. Underground gasoline and heating oil tanks will not be permitted.
Agenda Item No. 12. ZMA-92-14. Wendell Wood. Public Rearing to rezone
a prox 57 acs from RA to R-15 (Proffered). Property on E sd of Rt 606 approx
o 6 mi S of Rt 649. Site is in a designated growth area (Community of
H llymead) & is recommended for high density residential (10.01 to 34 du/ac)
i the Comprehensive Plan. TM32, Ps50,53,54,55&56. The following additional
p rcels are affected by the proposed road network: TM32,Ps42A,42B,42C,42D,42E,
4 ,45&TM46,P5 to remain zoned Rural Areas with proffers. Rivanna Dist.
APPROVE ZMA-92-14, with three proffers from the Planning Commission
r placing No. 1 with language in letter dated July 14, 1993, from W. Thomas
M ncaster, Jr., addressed to William D. Fritz, Senior Planner, all as follows:
1. The mobile home park is proffered for a period of not less than
fifteen years from the start of development in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan. During that period of time, the property
shall not be available to any other R-15, Residential uses except
nothing contained herein shall prohibit the Zoning Administrator
from authorizing uses deemed accessory and subordinate to the
mobile home park. In the event the conditions of SP-93-13 are not
met, or at the time of expiration of SP-93-13 in accordance with
Section 31.2.4.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant shall
permit the property to be rezoned to RA, Rural Areas, by the Board
of Supervisors and thereafter the property shall enjoy all RA
uses. For the purposes of this proffer, the term "start of
development" is defined as the date of issuance of the first
mobile home building permit. Nothing herein shall prohibit the
Board of Supervisors from granting an extension of the expiration
date of SP-93-13 in accordance with Section 31.2.4.4 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
2. The frontage of Route 29 containing Tax Map 32, Parcels 43A, 43,
42E, 42D, 42B, 42C, 42A and Tax Map 46, ParcelS, shall contain
not more than three entrances. The County may require closure of
any existing entrances at the time of establishment of any new
entrance such that the total number of entrances does not exceed
three.
3. An access road between the mobile home sales area and mobile home
park shall be developed at the time of establishment of the mobile
home sales use. This access road shall be used only for the
movement of mobile homes between the two uses and for emergency
access.
Agenda Item No. 13. SP-93-13. United Land Corporation. Public Rearing
to establish mobile home park on approx 57 acs under ZMA-92-14.
APPROVE SP-92-13 with the nine conditions recommended by the Planning
Co ission.
Mj:!mo to:
Dfl.te:
(Page 5)
8.
9.
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
July 15, 1993
1.
Deletion/relocation of all lots within fifty feet of an adjacent
parcel;
2.
Planning Commission approval of final site plan;
3.
staff approval of all mobile home units proposed for location
within the mobile home park to ensure compliance with the acousti-
cal performance standards of Section 30.2.5;
4.
Staff approval of private road maintenance agreements at such time
as the property may be subdivided;
5.
Maintenance of recreation facilities shall be the responsibility
of the property owner in accord with Section 4.16.3.2;
6.
No direct connection to Route 29 shall be made without amendment
of this permit;
7.
provision of a conventional "T" intersection with Route 606
constructed in accordance with Virginia Department of Transporta-
tion requirements. Access is shown on a plan initialled "WDF"
dated 7/8/93;
No plan of development shall be submitted for review until the
necessary easements and/or right-of-way acquisition for the Route
606 entrance have been obtained;
Provision of access to Tax Map 32, Parcel 46.
Agenda Item No. 14. ZMA-93-06. United Land Corporation. Public
Rlaring to rezone 7.9 acs from RA to HC (Proffered) located on W sd of Rt 29
a]prox 600 ft S of Timberwood Blvd. Site is located in a designated growth
a ea (Community of Hollymead) & is recommended for regional service in the
Ccmprehensive Plan, TM32,Ps43&43A. The following additional parcels are
a fected by the proposed road network: TM32,Ps42A,42B,42C,42D,42E,44,45 &
T146,P5 to remain zoned Rural Areas with proffers. Rivanna Dist.
APPROVE ZMA-93-06 with five proffers as follows:
1. The mobile home sales lot use will be limited to mobile home sales
and existing grocery store and gasoline sales.
2. The mobile home sales lot entrance will be closed or altered if
required by the future plan of development for the remaining area
designated office and regional service in the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The frontage on Route 29 containing Tax Map 32, Parcels 43A, 43,
42E, 42D, 42B, 42C, 42A and Tax Map 46, Parcel 5 shall contain not
more than three entrances. The County may require closure of any
existing entrances at the time of establishment of any new en-
trances such that the total number of entrances does not exceed
three.
4. The site plan for the mobile home sales lot will not be signed
until the site plan for a minimum of 100 mobile home units is
signed.
Memo to:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
July 15, 1993
D lite:
(bage 6)
5.
An access road between the mobile home sales area and mobile home
park shall be developed at the time of establishment of the mobile
home sales use. This access road shall be used only for the
movement of mobile homes between the two uses and for emergency
access.
Agenda Item No. 15. SP-93-14. United Land Corporation. Public Rearing
tl establish outdoor storage & display & sales of mobile homes on 7.9 ac zoned
~ & EC (See ZMA-93-06 above). Property on W sd of Rt 29 approx 600 ft S of
T mberwood Blvd. TM32,Ps43&43A. Rivanna Dist.
APPROVE SP-93-14 with a condition reading:
1. The inventory shall include mobile homes which meet the noise
attenuation standards on ZMA-92-14.
Agenda Item No. 16. Discussion: Revenue Sharing Projects (deferred
fl om July 7, 1993).
APPROVED maintaining the current local appropriation of $276,734 to
ccmplete the Route 250 East landscaping project.
Agenda Item No. 18. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
Be ARD .
Mr. Perkins requested the Board to endorse having staff speed up the
p~~lic hearing process for an application from the Albemarle County Fair which
is to be filed in the near future. It was the consensus that it would be
okay, particularly since Mr. Cilimberg said there was no way to speed up the
prpcess for the Planning Commission. The speed up would take place between
th~ Planning Commission hearing and the Board of Supervisors' meeting. Mr.
Ba~n did not agree at all with this idea.
Mr. Bain asked about a committee recommended by Citizens for Albemarle
which would determine who is unemployed and who is underemployed. Mr.
Bo~erman said he had spoken to representatives at the Chamber of Commerce
abput private sources of funding for some of this study. He suggested the
Bo.rd discuss the idea on August 4, 1993.
Mr. Bain said he had a meeting with the private haulers to discuss the
Re ycling Ordinance. Some changes will be recommended in parts of the
or~inance which is to be discussed by the Board again on August 4.
Mr. Bowerman noted that Mr. Blake Hurt has resigned from the Fiscal
Impact Committee. He suggested that Mr. Charles (Chuck) Rotgin, Jr. be
appointed to take his place on the Committee. APPROVED.
MOVED by Mr. Marshall to rehear SP-92-56 for Schuyler Enterprises.
DE"EATED by a 3/3 vote.
lell/
At achments (2)
cc Robert B. Brandenburger
Richard Huff, II
Amelia Patterson
Roxanne White
Bruce Woodzell
File
I
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board
construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be
received from the local government or state agency in order that the Virginia
Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in Albemarle
County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby request the
Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project for the screening of
the CSX rail siding and yard at Keswick along Route 22, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Keswick Garden Club (on
behalf of Albemarle County) does hereby agree to pay twenty percent of the total
cost for planning and design, right of way, and construction of this project, and
that if Albemarle County subsequently elects to cancel this project, Albemarle
County hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for
the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the
Department is notified of such cancellation.
Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
Attest:
By(}J~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
,f;k izJ (1 ~ Date: July 14, 1993
Clerk <:j'-
0#
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board
construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution
be received from the local government or state agency in order that the
Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in
Albemarle County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby request the
Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project for the
improvement of The Thomas Jefferson Parkway (U.S. Route 53), and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Thomas Jefferson Memorial
Foundation (on behalf of Albemarle County) hereby agrees to pay twenty
percent of the total cost for planning and design, right of way, and
construction of this project, and that if Albemarle County subsequently elects
to cancel this project, Albemarle County hereby agrees to reimburse the
Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs
expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of
such cancellation.
Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
Attest:
BY")4C2~~
aVIQ P. Bowerman, ChaIrman
$'& w {~
Clerk ~
Date: July 14. 1993
M T. GRIFFI
Regional Fore er
-.... ,-. /~-
'/-(j- ~(3
/1:. ~ - , - i I (::-. i'
l)'j C (I'. ).: /
..
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY rn
Old Route 29S & Fontaine Avenue
Post Office Box Q
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
(804) 977-5193
June 30, 1993
JUL -'~ tm
rn
BOARD OF IlJPEINISORS
Co nty of Albemarle Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Rd.
Ch rlottesville, Va. 22901
Tax Map # 22-1
Albemarle County is currently experiencing a severe outbreak of Southern Pine Bark
Bee Ie (SPBB). We have just finished viewing slide photography taken May 16, 1993 and
plo ing, on Albemarle County tax maps, what appears to be pine trees killed by SPBB. There
ma be small errors in the tax map information, but in field checking the system it has proven to
be ccurate. The photographic data and the most recent tax map indicate that there is an
out reak of SPBB on your property.
On the enclosed tax map, the solid red marks are areas of possible SPBB activity on your
pro erty. The area outlined in green represents the pine timber likely to be affected by SPBB, if
left ncontrolled. Also, for your information, the areas cross-hatched in red represents SPBB
infe tations on neighboring properties. You and/or your agent should inspect this property
im ediately.
With numerous infestations throughout Albemarle County, the Virginia Department of
For stry can not make field visits to confirm all of these sites in a timely manner. We feel, in
ora r to best serve all the landowners of Albemarle County, the best we can do is alert you and
all t e other landowners affected that aerial photography indicates an active SPBB infestation on
you property. This will enable you, with confirmation, to address the problem in a timely
ma ner and avoid greater financial loss of your timber's value.
As SPBB multiply they will move and affect additional healthy pine trees creating spots of
dea and dying trees. The beetles bore through the bark and tunnel around under the bark,
effe tively girdling the tree and killing it. Clusters of these dying or dead trees, called "spots",
will radually enlarge from one tree to dozens of pine trees, or in extreme cases, the entire stand,
in 0 e year.
Mission: A Forest Resource to Meet the Needs of the Commonwealth
-2-
In general, we recommend that you harvest or cut down the infested trees with a 50'-100'
buffer of uninfested trees. However, because of the current widespread outbreak and the difficulty
in determining the trees actually infested with the SPBB, this method in other counties has had little
success in controlling the spread of the bark beetle. Therefore, it may be more prudent to promptly
hal1!...~t all the merchantable pine timber from the pine area of your property. This would be the
area~), ttf~ ~ .fe.-tin on your attached map.
. ..........~..........__..
1!'e highly recommend that you hire a professional Consulting Forester to assist you in the
markeHng of your timber.. , These professionals can assist you in determining the actual extent of the
, prtJbJ~ {,4lrulnfp thff( valtje of the timber, and either help sell the timber or determine the reportable
i ;7.iJD3iJIfIiF;~~ulting Forester can also draw up a timber sale contract to protect your
"interests, prepare necessa'fy legal documents for areas of your property covered by the Virginia Seed
Tree Law, oversee the cutting operation, help compute taxable income, investment tax credits, and
work with you to secure the best reforestation options available. I have enclosed a county list of
professional Consulting Foresters.
The local markets for pine have been flooded by timber being salvaged due to attack by
SPBB. The only real chance of getting afair market valuefor this timber is to aggressively market
this timber to a wide list of potential buyers. I can send you a list of local timber buyers if you are
interested, but the Consulting Foresters will routinely advertise your sale to at least a hundred
potential buyers. Due to the economy of scale, you may have better success at marketing small areas
of timber by discussing a combined timber sale with your affected neighbors. The Department of
Forestry can be of assistance to you in identifying adjacent landowners who have been affected by
SPBB so that you may contact them.
We realize this is a lot of information to process at once, so please, if you have any questions,
feelfree to contact us at the Virginia Department of Forestry, P.O. Box Q, Charlottesville, VA 22903
(804/977-5193). You can reach me at my home between 7:00 and 9:00 p.m. evenings, at 804/973-
2215 if you cannot reach me during the day.
Please understand that delaying removal operations for any reason will only give the insects
more time to infest and destroy more timber. The difference between merchantable trees (income)
and nonmerchantable trees (no income) is usually less than six months, once a pine tree is infested.
Sincerely,
tV,J .s1~v
Nelson J. Shaw, Area Forester
NJS:js
Enclosures:
Consultant List
Tax Map
SPBB Brief
. ,
21
SCALE IN fEET
...
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
~z -I
~ot AlblM\lMk
~
Stream or Creek
Property boundary
SPBB Spot
SPBB Spot on Neighbor
Pine area in which SPBB could spread
t
I
I
~
23
^\
<:,~/ 1\
~/" I I
/'f /'
~
RIVANNA DISTRICT
SECTION 22
.
CONSULTING FORESTERS LIST
FOR
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
(UPDATED JUNE 18, 1993)
The list be ow indicates those Consulting Foresters who have shown a willingness to work in this County, Their services and affiliations vary so we have
used a co responding lettering system to list the different services each offer. (See back) I
As an age cy that serves the public, the Department of Forestry cannot select one or more of these Consulting Foresters as the one(s) most suitable
for your ty e of work. We suggest, however, that you talk to as many of those listed as you want, and that you ask them questions specific to your needs
and objec ives, It is also suggested that you get several references, and that you call/contact at least two or three of the people with whom the
consultant has worked to determine the client satisfaction level with the services performed,
Blue Ridg Forestry Consultants
Gary A, Yc unkin
Rt, 1, Box ~13
Hume, VA ~2639
(703) 675- 088
A CHI J N X Y BB CC DD
ACF BMP pAF
Caleb Morris
137 Bennington Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
(804) 293-4848
BMP
B G S BB
C & K For stry Services, Inc,
Randy Kyr er
618 Stage cach Road
Charlottes i1le, VA 22901
BMP SAF If FA
A C D E G H I J K M N 0 Q S V Y Z BB CC DD
Nelson & Associates
A.L.C, Nelson
2994 Peanut Lane
Mechanicsvilie, VA 23111
(804) 746-9286 (804) 730-8717
BMP SAF VFA ACE
ABC D E F G H I J K L M N P Q R S Y Z AA BB CC DD
Cabell Tirr ber Management and Appraisals
Larry CabE II
6 Tennis Dive
Charlottes ille, Virginia 22901
(804) 973- 988
BMP SAF FA
C E I J L 1\ N 0 Q V X Y Z BB CC DD
National Resources Consultants, Inc.
Rick Preve
302 Park Street
Charlottesville, VA 22901
o (804) 296-1464 or (800)362-8497 H (703) 456-6448
BMP SAF VFA ACE
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQR
S Y Z AA BB CC DD
Central Vir~inia Forestry Consultant
Brian Edsc n
107 Northv est Lane
Charlottes ille, VA 22901
(804) 293- 817
BMP VFA AF
ABC G I K N 0 Q R Z BB CC DD
North American Resource Management
David Tice
P,O, Box 6777
Charlottesville, VA 22906
o (804) 293-8733 or (804) 296-3344
H (804) 973-5943
ACF
A C D E F I J K L N 0 P Q R Y Z BB CC DD
Environmertal Timber Management
Paul M, He ney
P,O, Box 1~80
Charlottes i1le, VA 22902
(804)977-8 56
BMP, SAF, ACF, VFA
A C H , J ~ L M N 0 Q R U V X Y AA BB CC DD EE FF
. Tree Works
Lyttleton W, Wood
P,O, Box 211
Washington, VA 22747
(703) 675-1088
BMP
B D E G I J 0 R T U Y AA BB CC DD
McChesne Goodall and Associates, Inc,
Ches Gooe all
1710 Rugbv Avenue
Charlottes i1le, VA 22901
H (804) 29 -6230 0 (804) 295-1131
BMP SAF FA
A C D E F J K L M N 0 Q S T Z BB CC DD
Chuck Wright
Route 6, Box 250
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 296-3178
BMP SAF VFA
A C F G H I J K M N 0 V Y Z AA CC
John McN ir, Jr. & Associates
John McN1 ir, Jr.
L.B, & B B i1ding
Waynesbo p, VA 22980
(703) 943-S~79
EFKLM PQTW
LISTING OF SERVICES OFFERED
BY CONSULTING FORESTERS AND TIMBER CRUISER
A. Appraisals of land and timber cruising
AA. Tree planting
B. Christmas tree management
BB. Urban Forestry
C. Damage and trespass appraisals
CC. Water management and BMP's installation
0, Ecological studies
DO, Wildlife management plans
E, Environmental impact studies
EE. Wetland delineation
F. Feasibility studies
FF. Soil mapping
G. Forest insect diagnosis and treatment
H, Forest litigation
BMP_ Signed Memorandum of Agreement
to encourage clients to follow Best
Management Practices
I. Forest Management Plans
J. General forest management
SAF. Membership in Society of American Foresters
K. Investment counseling and economic analyses
L. Land acquisition
ACF. Membership in Association of
Consulting Foresters
M, Logging engineering, road design
VFA. M e m b e r 0 f Vir gin i a For est r y
Association
N, Timber sales contract preparation and administration
0, Mapping
p, Mineland reclamation
Q. Outdoor recreational studies
R. Natural resources educational presentations
S. Real estate sales, licensed brokers
T. Recreational land development
u. Shade and fruit tree service
V, Site Preparation
w. Surveying, licensed
x. Timber harvesting
Y. Timber stand improvement
z. Timber taxation
"
", - f,} ~].:~
~:.;, ~-) 1'~ ,] '"
:\ Post OfJlce Box 26666
'" '::'13 (II \'l. \ .l. r:."'.;,6) Richmond, Virainia 23261
'h".ot'q ... b
July 8, 1993
SERVICE - VIRGINIA CASE NO. POE930032
APPLICATION OP VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
POR APPROVAL OP PEAK DAY PRICING PILOT - RIDER K
T Local Government Officials
Pursuant to Paragraph No. 13 of the state Corporation
C mmission's Order of June 30, 1993, Virginia Power is providing
y u a copy of that Order. Please take notice of its contents.
A complete copy of Virginia Power's Application in Case No.
E930032 may be obtained from Virginia Power at no cost by written
quest to Mr. James S. Copenhaver, Virginia Power, P.O. Box
666, Richmond, Virginia 23261.
~. L,L
James S. C9Penhaver
Senior Regulatoty Counsel
-------.. :>,
E closure
- .-, ,..-.,,' :. '-:" . - ,... ,.~" .
;.. .. ......~ 1 . _ I .' '-'-"
930710004 'f ~r~
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
AT RICHMOND, JUNE 30, lNJ:EIVED BY
i JUl 0 6 ~ ~,~IJ
-~f'"'\t
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
APPLIC~!~~~::~ F:~ 4: is
ORDER SUSPENDING RATES AND R
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
For approval of Peak Day
Pricing Pilot - Rider K
On April 26, 1993, Virginia Electric and Power Company
("Virginia Power" or "Company") filed an application requesting
approval of a residential rate design experiment designated as
"Rider K, Peak Day Pricing pilot" (the "pilot program"). On
June 21, 1993, the Company filed a revised Rider K, clarifying
that the pilot program would only be available in its Central,
Eastern and Northern Divisions.
The primary purpose of the pilot program is to determine
"customer acceptance of, and response to, dynamic time-of-use
pricing where the Company's high cost periods are better
defined." Under Rider K, the Company will designate no more than
28 days per year as peak days, which will be subject to higher
rates for specified hours during the day. On these days, the
resulting rate under Rider K during an eight-hour peak period is
approximately $O.37/kWh. Usage at all other times is priced at
Schedule 1 rates, less 17%.
Billing under Rider K will be achieved through a time-of-use
meter having a switchable register. For peak days, the Company
will send a signal to the meter which will trigger a register to
record usage during the peak period. The pilot program will be
limited to 48 Virginia residential customers, on a voluntary
basis only. The Company proposes to limit the program
availability to those areas, which, the Company has advised,
include its Northern, Central and Eastern districts, where
transmitting equipment is currently in place.
The Company's request is properly characterized as a rate
experiment and as such is intended to collect data on the
effectiveness of the program as a load management tool. Virginia
Code S 56-234 states the following as to experimental rates:
. no provision of law shall be deemed to
preclude voluntary rate or rate design tests
or experiments, or other experiments
involving the use of special rates, where
such experiments have been approved by order
of the Commission after notice and hearing
and a finding that such experiments are
necessary in order to acquire information
which is or may be in furtherance of the
public interest . . .
NOW THE COMMISSION, having considered the application and
the relevant statutes finds that notice to all potentially
affected customers is appropriate; that the Commission staff
should investigate the reasonableness of the Company's request;
and that a period of time wherein interested persons may request
a hearing should be established. Pending Commission action on
Virginia Power's request, the proposed rates shall be suspended.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) That on or before July 7, 1993, the Company shall make
copies of its application and supporting data and proposed
tariffs available for public inspection during regular business
hours at all of its offices in its affected service territory
where customer bills may be paid;
2
I
(2) That, pursuant to Rule 7:1 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure ("Rules"), a Hearing Examiner is
appointed to conduct all further proceedings in this matter;
(3) That a public hearing before a Hearing Examiner is
scheduled for October 7, 1993, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the
Commission's Courtroom, Second Floor, Tyler Building, 1300 East
Main street, Richmond, Virginia, for the purpose of receiving
evidence relevant to the application;
(4) That, on or before July 21, 1993, Virginia Power shall
file with the Clerk of the Commission an original and fifteen
(15) copies of any additional direct testimony and exhibits it
intends to present in support of its application and shall serve
a copy of same on each party of record;
(5) That the Company shall respond to written
interrogatories within ten (10) days of receipt of same and shall
provide to the Staff or any party to this proceeding a copy of
its workpapers supporting its application and testimony promptly
upon request. Protestants shall also respond to written
interrogatories within ten (10) days of receipt of same.
Protestants shall provide to Virginia Power, other Protestants,
and Staff any workpapers or documents used in preparation of
their filed testimony promptly upon request. Except as so
modified, discovery shall be in accordance with Part VI of the
Rules;
(6) That, on or before August 18, 1993, any person
desiring to participate as a Protestant, as defined in Rule 4:6,
shall file with the Clerk of the Commission an original and
3
I
testimony and exhibits it intends to present at the public
hearing and shall serve a copy of said testimony and exhibits
upon counsel for the Company and upon each Protestant;
(10) That, on or before September 27, 1993, the Company
shall file an original and fifteen (15) copies of all testimony
it expects to introduce in rebuttal to all prefiled direct
testimony and exhibits, and shall serve a copy of its prefiled
rebuttal testimony and exhibits upon all parties of record;
(11) That any person desiring to comment in writing on the
Company's application may do so by directing such comments on or
before September 10, 1993, to the Clerk of the Commission,
referring to Case No. PUE930032. Any person desiring to make a
statement at the public hearing need only appear in the
Commission's Second Floor Courtroom at 9:30 a.m. on the day of
the hearing and identify himself or herself to the Bailiff as a
public witness;
(12) That on or before July 21, 1993, the Company shall
complete publication of the following notice, to be published
once a week for two consecutive weeks in (a) The Virginian-Pilot,
(b) The Richmond Times-Dispatch, (c) The Springfield Journal, and
(d) The Woodbridge Potomac News:
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF AN APPLICATION FOR
APPROVAL TO IMPLEMENT PEAK DAY PRICING PILOT
(RIDER K - RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS) BY
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
CASE NO. PUE930032
On April 26, 1993, Virginia Electric and
Power Company ("Virginia Power" or "Company")
filed its application for approval of its
Peak Day-Pricing Pilot for Residential
CUstomers (Rider K). Under the program, the
Company will select up to 28 days per year as
5
peak days. For electricity used during
specified hours on those peak days, customers
will be billed at higher rates, approximately
37 cents per kWh. At all other times, usage
will be priced at regular rates, less 17%.
A copy of the Company's application is
available for public inspection during
regular business hours at any Company office
where customer bills may be paid and at the
state Corporation Commission's Document
Control Center, First Floor, Tyler Building,
1300 East Main street, Richmond, Virginia,
between the hours of 8:15 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
The Commission has suspended the
proposed rates and has scheduled a public
hearing before a Hearing Examiner for
10:00 a.m., on October 7, 1993, in the
Commission's Courtroom, located on the Second
Floor of the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia, for the purpose
of receiving evidence relevant to the
application.
Any person desiring to comment in
writing on the application may do so by
directing such comments on or before
September 10, 1993, to the Clerk of the State
Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control
Center, P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia
23216, referring to Case No. PUE930032. Any
person desiring to make a statement at the
public hearing need only appear in the
Commission's Courtroom at 9:30 a.m. on the
day of the hearing and identify himself or
herself to the Bailiff as a public witness.
On or before August 18, 1993, any person
desiring to participate as a Protestant, as
defined in Rule 4:6 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure ("Rules") and to
present evidence and cross-examine witnesses
shall file an original and fifteen (15)
copies of a Notice of Protest, as provided in
Rule 5:16(a), with the Clerk of the
Commission at the above address and shall
serve a copy of said Notice of Protest on
Virginia Power, through its counsel, James S.
Copenhaver, Esquire, Virginia Electric and
Power Company, P.O. Box 26666, Richmond,
Virginia 23261, and on all other parties of
record.
6
Within five (5) days of the receipt of
any Notice of Protest, Virginia Power shall
serve upon each Protestant a copy of the
application and all material relevant to the
application now or hereafter filed with the
Commission.
On or before September 10, 1993, each
Protestant shall file with the Clerk of the
Commission at the above address an original
and fifteen (15) copies of the prepared
testimony and exhibits such Protestant
expects to introduce at the public hearing,
together with an original and fifteen (15)
copies of a Protest, which shall set forth
(i) a precise statement of the interest of
the Protestant in the proceedings; (ii) a
full and clear statement of the facts that
the Protestant is prepared to prove by
competent evidence, and (iii) a statement of
the specific relief sought and the legal
basis therefor. Each Protestant shall also
serve a copy of its Protest and its prepared
testimony and exhibits on the Company and on
any other Protestant. Any corporate entity
wishing to participate as a Protestant must
be represented by legal counsel in accordance
with the requirements of Rule 4:8.
Any party participating as a Protestant
should review the instructions regarding
discovery set forth in the Commission Order
entered in this proceeding dated June 30,
1993.
All written communications to the
Commission should be directed to William J.
Bridge, Clerk, State Corporation Commission,
c/o Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118,
Richmond, Virginia 23216, and should refer to
Case No. PUE930032.
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
(13) That on or before July 21, 1993, Virginia Power shall
!erve a true copy of this Order on the chairman of the Board of
~upervisors of each county and upon the Mayor or Manager of each
city or town (or equivalent officials) in the service territories
affected by this application. Service shall be made by first
7
class mail to the customary place of business or residence of the
person served;
(14) That at the commencement of the public hearing herein,
the Company shall provide to the Commission proof of the notice
and service required herein; and
(15) That pending further orders of the Commission, the
Company's proposed rates shall be suspended.
AN ATTESTED COpy of this Order shall be sent by the Clerk of
the Commission to: James S. Copenhaver, Esquire, Virginia
Electric and Power Company, P.O. Box 26666, Richmond, Virginia
23216; Kristen J. Brown, Esquire, Commonwealth Gas Service, Inc.,
200 Civic Center Drive, P.O. Box 117, Columbus, Ohio 43216-0117;
Edward L. Petrini, Esquire, Office of Attorney General, Division
of Consumer Counsel, 101 North 8th Street, Richmond, Virginia
23219; and to the Commission's Divisions of Economics and Finance
and Energy Regulation.
. - ~-4'
,A True Copy 11 "Ill ~~. ."'" .' ·
Testl; IIV~ ...,. .
~..' .; . Glerk" the ....~',.
~ ~:StIfte ~ CommlnfcJn ..
8
w" .\
C harlottesvill e
Housing
Foundation
'ffi
""'1
~ ..~ rn 0 W ~ ~l\
III. i
:\~1 L~J.
MEMORANDUM
'BO~RD OF SUPERVISORSl
FROM:
Forrest D. Kerns
1~1 ~~i/
TO:
David Benish
Robert Tucker
DATE:
July 9, 1993
RE:
CROZET CROSSING
Sales. John Shepherd has written contracts for twelve homes to date.
One contract has been rejected by VHDA as ineligible because the
purchaser's income is too high. The other contracts that have been written
since April are in various stages of the closing process. We expect three
closings to occur in July and three in August. Two or three additional
contracts may close depending on the buyers meeting the eligibility
requirements. One other contract is scheduled to close in September.
A Buyers Seminar is scheduled for July 12th with more than 30 families
signed up to attend. The Selection Committee will meet again this month to
approve applicants from this seminar.
CHF Marketing Committee. An open house has been schedule for Sunday,
July 25, to show Crozet Crossing homes to the public, eligible buyers,
interested neighbors, and the boards and staff of Albemarle County, CHF and
AHIP. We plan to have two houses open and will provide a light
refreshment. There will be a local radio station broadcasting on site to
help notify and attract buyers. We also plan to have the houses on display
for several Sundays after this opening event.
The committee has also written a letter to local realtors asking them
to show Crozet Crossing to eligible buyers. A brochure about Crozet
Crossing has been produced and is available for distribution.
Construction. On June 28 Haley, Chisholm and Morris paved the street
and seeded the shoulders and ditches. Also the dirt pile beside Lot 1 was
oved and placed on the side of the street to reduce the slope.
exander/Nicholson is working on houses in Phase III and is scheduled to
ave the last houses started and under roof this month.
100 Court Square Annex, Suite E . Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 . 804/979-0967
..
Construction Financing. CHF is still short of capital to pay the
contractor. However, we are expecting to meet the amount due the
contractor in July from the above-mentioned contracts that should close in
~uly. CHF has asked VHDA to provide additional construction loan money
cbove the $550,000 maximum to allow CHF funds if the closing schedules are
celayed.
Farmers Home Financed Houses. Last month the FmHA State Office
cpproved the subdivision application and directed CHF to contact the local
lmHA office to proceed with the necessary procedures to obtain FmHA
financing. CHF has decided to limit the FmHA financed houses to the two
touses currently under construction due to construction schedule and the
Echeduling requirements of the local office.
CHF has spent a considerable amount of time and money pursuing
financing by FmHA, primarily to allow much lower income families to live in
Crozet Crossing. During this long process each time CHF met one of the
Iequirements by FmHA, there was always another hurdle that cost additional
rroney to provide the houses. Therefore, our decision is to limit the
nouses that will be built for FmHA financing.
Housing Trust Fund. Last Friday, July 2, at a meeting in Richmond
~~th officials at DHCD many decisions and actions were made about the
recapture plan and the Housing Trust Fund. The first agreement allows CHF
tp move forward with closing on loans. Without going into details here,
C~F would like to have discussions with Albemarle County about several
cpnditions set forth in Amanda Healy's letter.
Forrest Kerns
-2-
~
j
.r
. ,
.
-4- -.. /<~ '.~
/---,--_._,
,r-. / .__'
;') ,'",. ~ ~3 C;'; /~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE 1~(q,--<-" 11t-
W~...n ~ \\l ~ ~ ~ ~~\
. ,--
~ '. I
I '.'. '-
Of SUPERV'SOP-~)
MEMORANDUM
Mr. Bob Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
David B. Benish~~~ief of Community Development
June 30, 1993
E: Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System
Construction Budget, Fiscal Year 1993-94
St ff has reviewed the proposed Secondary System Construction
bu get for FY93-94 submitted by Virginia Department of
Tr nsportation. The budget is consistent with priorities of the
ap roved Six Year Secondary Road Plan. Staff would recommend
ap roval of the budget as proposed.
DB /blb
cc: Dan Roosevelt
, .
, ,
,
.J
~~"S. .
-<'IV
r'
May 28, 1993
Secondary System Construction
Budget Fiscal Year 1993-94
Albemarle County
Mr. ~a~ne Cilimberg
County Office Building
401 Mc~ntire Road
Charlottesville, VA. 22902
Dear Mr. Cilimberg:
..
Please find attached a priority list for the above referenced budget which
contains estimates of project costs, the phase of work being financed and the total
funds ~vailable for the Secondary System Construction Plan FY 1993-94 in Albemarle
County. This priority list is taken from the approved Six Year Plan.
~e request that this information be presented at an advertised public hearing
as req~ired in Section 33.1-70.1 of the Code of Virginia. Following the public
hearin~ in each county, the board of supervisors, with VDOT concurrence, shall adopt
a pricrity program for the ensuing fiscal year. Anticipated financing from the FY
1993-94 revenue sharing program is not to be included in thi~ budget.
...
Irior to adoption of the FY 1993-94 priority list, our office is available for
a wor~ session, if necessary, to discuss this information. Please contact this
officE at your earliest convenience so that we may schedule this meeting.
'.
AGT /lC w
Yours truly,
A. G. Tucker
Assistant Resident Engineer
At tad ments
cc: (. D. Lipscomb
... '" ... ... '" ...
'" ~ ... 8
2: '" ... ... '" ... ...
~ .. '" '" ~ '" III
0 E .. ... ... ~ ... .. ...
... '" ... .. '" ...
'" Q 0 II> II> ~ II> '"
~ '" ..; '" '"
N ...
., e ... -...
... * * ... ... ... ...
'"
'"
:=
..: .
... ..
.. .
.. ~ 0.
~ .
., ! ~
... :l :-
oC u .
~
i '"
'"
2:
<II
I > ... .
0 "''''
II: eti
~ 15
~ ... 0."
II .. ~~
~ oC
... ~
t .. .. ! ~ II I
oC ..
15 ~ ~ ! ~ ~ e oC i ~
~ j:: ~ .... ..
III ~. i :l ~ 8'
z oC ... oC
... .. ~ III 5 ~ ! ~ . ..
Cl .. e z .. ~ 0.""
~ ~ ~ 0 oC ~..
... ~
> <II III g '" fi .,
~ .. ; ... ....
... III ~ '" o ..
0 E 0
.. .. i ' " ....
i ... .. '" f ... .. ..
oC ~ oC ~~
0 '" ~ :l ""
z I
i ~ ... ti ~ ... ~
0 i a
'" I III ~ > '" ~~
oC ~ I
III ~ ... ! ~ .,
oC "'...
~ t ... '" 0
... '" '"
,;
.
..
..
I
..
III
- .
+--+------t
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
t I
I I
I I
t
::!
..
..
... ~
'" l:i
~ E S
.; ..
,., 8 ~ u
C II
.. ..
~ N ..
.... ~
., 0 '" ,., I
'"
'" --+------+
... I I
I 0 I 8
..; I 0 I
,., Z I 0 I
'" 0 I III I III
~ .. .. ;:: I I
!j I ... I ...
... .. .. I .,. I .,.
..; .. .. ., ~ I I
II llo I I
. .. I I
>- .. llo .. I I
5 &J a .. .. I I
... .. I I
., .. C I I
+--+------+
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
-.. I
I
I
I
I
I !l
I
I C
t ..
t .
I ..
>
0
I Z ..
I 0 !
I ~ ..
I ..
I ..
ti I .. ...
I .. ... .,
s ~ I ~ ..
I g .. C
I .. ..
.. III I C .. > ~
:: .. I .. ...
.. Z I .. III U
Z .. 0 I = oS
;; ~ '" I III
H I .. ..
III ! I .. .
... I " ., :;l
> ~ I ...,
... r:: ~ I !~ ~
I
0 Z I I
~ 0 +--t------+ .
~ >- U I I I
III I I I
~ ... I I I
.., >- 0 I r: I I
= I I I
I ~ I ~ I I
! I I I
I I I
.. I I I
Ci ti I I I
I I I
C III C I I I
+--+------+
I I I
I I I
I l!l I I
I I I
I I I
I ~e I 8 I
I I I
'" I I ,., I
I a'" I III I
CIl I I t
I I .. I I
I ... I I
.. I I I
+--+------+
'i ~ I I I
I I I
I I I
!J ~ I I I
I I I
I> I ~ I I
.. Ci:.l I I III I
e I I N I
I I '" I
.. i I .. I I
I t I
N I I I
I I I I
.. I I I
III +-_t______+
.' ,
..
...
CD
...
'i
'"
...
>
.
..
oC
...
I
..
III
..
...
~
.;
..,
~
.,
..,
'"
~
..;
~
.,
~
;!;
'"
~
>
...
o
~
oC
OJ
:a
!
~
...
o
'lr)l
B
'"
III
~
N
o
.:
=
.
.c
...
..
z
o
;:
..
..
..
~
!2
..
~
...
o
~
~
eJ
I'l
t;
E
l!!
c
....
'"
..
.
...
.
...
B
~
Iii
>-
III
>-
..
..
Ii
~
III
..,
...
~
+--+------+------+------+------+
I I ,
I I ,
I ,
I ,
I I
, I
I I
I
I
, .. S ~
S I: ... t~
~ i:..... ..., !"
I: 0 ~ :....~
! i ~ j ~!
..., I"" .......
j'~ ! j ~ I ~ P
... ~ :... 8 ;;: B ;;:S B
--+------+------+------+------
I I I I
::2 : ~ : ~ :
I N I M I ~ I
I I I I
1\0 If'- 1M I
I; ! i ! i i
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I t
I I I I
I I I I I I
+--+------+------+------+------+
I I I ,
" : ~OOOI, O~~ ~~o ~80~:
I I ....'" I 8::~ ...'" 0 0 I
I I I.. .. .. .. .. .
I I ~o o~- NCI) II') In 0 I
, I _0 . ~ ~~ ~mct
I I MN ~ N 00 ~_MI
: I "'_.., "'''' N ...In
I I t C
I I I .
I I 000 *00 00 0001.
I I I .
I I >
I I 0
: -... ,: ~
I I I .
I I I....
I ... ... ..,. .."
f .;:;: I : V
~ ::.!..!.! ! 0'
~ 8 ~ i S ~~ 8: 8:~
...... -t. ........ ". -t I -t I
~ : ~ +''O~ ~ ': ~: = ~ i'i
w 8",;i8 ~~+'i8 IIlllltii8 :.......ti~8 :~
c ~~....u::~~:: it1::~ ':"':1u::~: ~:"B::I I il
.....'0.. o:!" "z.... :....'0.. Ii
~~~iJf ~B~i]f 5~~i];i!~~i]fi~
....~=:B .....~:E ....~::~: ....~~:B:i
~~i~~~ ~~=~~~ ~~i~~~I~~i~~~::
+--+------+------+------+------+
I I I I I 1
I I I I I 1
t I I 1 I I
:i5 l~ :~ li :i :
I ~ liE I I I
I 10 I" I 0 I 0 I
::N l~ IN :\D :
I to..... I to I
I I lit I
I I I I I I
+--+------+------+------+------+
I 1 I I I I
I I... IN 1 N 1 N I
:~:~ :~ ::& :~ :
1t:~:U :~ :U :u :
1~~IN ICD I. 1M I
:8~!~ !~ !~ i~ !
I CI: I N I N I N I N I
:":8 18 :8 :8 :
+--+------+------+------+------+
I I 1 1 I I
:: It): ~ l 41): ~:
I I 0 I 0 I CD t .-t I
Ii I... -~l -:: -~: -=:
1 1 "''''I.-t ..NI.... ....'M "CD'
I IU'I +' 1 M ., 1M ., I'" ., 1
1 '\0 ~_I..... ""_I\Q ~_If' ......_
I' ... I ... I ..., ... I
I I O~' O~' O~' O~'
I 1 .... I ~ I .... I -4 I
I I ..., ... I ..., .. I
" DoDo,.. AoA.1 AoAoI DoDo I
+--+------.+------+------+------+
..
.
..
...
o
~
+'
I>
..
..
+'
.
~
.,
g
..
~
o
o
o
'"
...
...
....
....
o
o
8
OJ
..
..
I'l
...
<I)
..,
<I)
ti
8
::>
III
z
o
~
~
~
...
o
~
...
..
ti
I'l
'- '-
'"
'"
...
'i
.!l
..
.
a:
<C
'"
,
a:
1/1
...
'"
~
o
M
~
..
M
'"
~
.;
..
5
..
~
~
c
a:
;;:
~
..
r: 0
II
~
..
o
~l
ti
1/1
~
N
o
~
J
.
.ll
...
<C
z
S
t-
<C
t-
or:
2
111
~
I:i
S
~
c
...
ID
..
.
0.
8-
a
~
Iii
ti
..
or:
<C
C
Z
~
1/1
+--+-------
, ,
, ,
, ,
III ,
.5 :
.. I
. I
. I
C I
i
~
~
..
. .,
. ..
...
... ...
. 0
..
....
.i
~;:
.:1
------
M
'"
!:
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
:li
,...
,t-
!~
,..
,
, I
+--+------
I I
I ,
I ,
I ,
I I
, I
I
I
,
: -....
I
I
I
: ~ ~
:... ~
! 5 e-
I.. ..
I ..."
I ~+,..n 1
! d 8 .!
I ~....... .
: "'. ~ i
!o..;~~g ~
I,~ .~u~-lJ .
"':1 c 6 0
: ~.:rIJ'i , ..
I B":""'~. 'i
',::....~!-;~ g> t!B.
...."tI..,....,
+__+.;~.E!~~_ .
.;
'"
...
III
...
...
'"
...
...
III
'"
...
III
'"
M
III
o
.
~
..
'"
M
III
o
t!
..
c
M
o
0......
"''''...
"'''''''
.........
"'M'"
......'"
'"
000
ti
~
li
Q
t!
~
~
t
~
c
~
~
~
"
~
~
..
o
I
I
I
l~
I
I
I I
+--+------
I I
I I...
'IX I 0
10 I U')
I I U
i ~ e i ~
: C3" I 'l'
1. I N
Ill. I 0
, I 0
+--+------
I I
, ,
I I ...
I I NO
'I ..._
'~' '"
I I N 11oo10
I I CD ...
I I U) .... ..
,A: I '"
I I 0 ~
I I ...
" ..
" Ao Do.
+--+-------
.:I
<C
~
~
..
ti
c
...
E
III
'"
-'
""
BOARD OF
SUPERV SOR
PRIOR TY
ROUTE ROUTE
NUMBER NAME
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRIORITY FOR SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
1992 - 93 THRU 1997 - 98
APPROVED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, FEBRUARY 19, 1992
lOCATION
FROM/TO
DESCRIPTION
COST
(12/91)
\--.:.~
ESTIMATED
ADVERTI SEMENT
12/91
========= ===================================================================================================================
51
52
53
54
55
56
5711-
58
59
60
61
62
711
760
637
759
6881791
708
679
605
667
737
615
606
BURTON RD
RED HILL SCHOOL RD
DICK \IOOOS RD
THREE CHOPT RD
MIDWAY RD
SECRETARYS RD
GRASSMERE RD
DURETT RIDGE RD
CATTERTON RD
MOUNTAIN VISTA RD
LINDSAY RD
DICKERSON RD
29/712
291712
635/682
616/FCl
635/D.E.
795/620
.15 FROM 738
.83 FROM GCl
665/776
61726
659/lOUISA Cl
850/1030
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
TOTAL COST
350,000
300,000
900,000
210,000
300,000
725,000
525,000
300,000
450,000
700,000
220,000
800,000
81,502,854
(7/96)
(7/96)
(7/97)
(7/97)
( 1199)
(1/99)
* IN CUR~ENT SIX YEAR PLAN.
I NEW PRCJECTS EXPECTED TO RECEIVE FUNDING IN THE veOT SIX YEAR SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1992-93 THRU 1997-98.
,., .
.
. ' .
SECONDARY SYSTEM
COUNTY: ALBEMARLE
.'r-'..
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
ESTIMATED ALLOCATIONS
YEAR
NEW S.T. FEDERAL
OTHER
TOTAL
....
----------------
1992-9
1997-9
$671,576 $1,497,644 $947,300 $3,116,520
$692,105 $2,271,743 $248,004 $3,211,852
$688,492 $2,198,584 $310,000 $3,197,076
$712,112 $2,003,063 $610,000 $3,325,175
$748,340 $2,230,000 $518,766 $3,497,106
$786,115 $2,380,260 $510,000 $3,676,375
1993-9
1994-9
1995-9
1996-9
--------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS
$4,298,740
$12,581,294
$3,144,070
$20,024,104
---~--------
4-1-22
-----------------------------------------------------
VDOT RESIDENT ENGINEER
DATE
-----------------------------------------------------
(CHAIRMAN,CLERK,CO.ADMINISTRATOR, ETC.) DATE
COUNTY
RESIDENCY
DISTRICT
ROUTE
ROUTE 063
TC: 1760
ID: 4189
CONTRACT
STATE
(
ROUTE
TC:
ID:
STATE
STATE
( 1)
----------
ROUTE 062
TC: 6
ID:
STATE
STATE
( 2)
----------
ROUTE 066
TC: 170
ID:
CONTRACT
STATE:
( 3)
----------
ROUTE 068
TC : 3 9
ID:
CONTRACT
STATE
( 3)
----------
ROUTE 069
TC: 39
ID:
CONTRACT
STATE
( 3)
I ROUTE--072
i TC: 20 7
ID:
CONTRACT
STATE
( 3)
----------
ROUTE 073
TC : 1 04
ID:
CONTRACT
STATE
( 3)
ROUTE 078
TC: 95
ID:
CONTRACT
STATE
( 3)
----------
ROUTE 080
TC : 1 38
ID:
CONTRACT
STATE
( 3)
SECONDARY SYSTEM
LBEMARLE
HARLOTTESVILLE
ULPEPER
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
I DESCRIPTION I ESTIMATED I I
LENGTH COST COMMENTS
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
RIO ROAD P.E. 200,000 FINANCE DEFICIT
0631-002-128,C503 R/W 160,000 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
FR:0.3 MI.E. RT. 29 CON 2,140,870
TO:RTE. 650 TOT 2,500,870
LENGTH: EAD 05 1990
ECD 07 1991
+--------------------+--~------------+------------------------------+'
COUNTY WIDE P.E. 0 REVENUE SHARING $100,000
8000-002- R/W 0 1993-94
NEW PIPE INSTALL., CON 600,000
SIGNS,SEEDING TOT 600~000
(BUDGET ITEMS) EAD 07 199~
ECD 06 1998
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
HATTON FERRY P.E. 0
0625-002- R/W 0
OPERATE CON 60,000
HATTON FERRY TOT 60,000
(BUDGET ITEM) EAD 07 1992
ECD 06 1998
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
NEW PLANT MIX P.E. 0
0664-002- R/W 0
FR:RTE. 665 CON 17,000
TO:RTE. 663 S TOT 17,000
LENGTH:0.4 MI EAD 07 1992
ECD 06 19~3
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
NEW PLANT MIX P.E. 0 REVENUE SHARING $45,000
0684-002- R/W 0 1993-94
FR:RTE. 788 CON 45,000
TO:MINT SPRINGS TOT 45,000
LENGTH:0.70 MI. EAD 07 1993
ECD 06 1994
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
NEW PLANT MIX P.E. 0 REVENUE SHARING $63,000
0692-002- R/W 0 1993-94
FR:RTE. 250 CON 63,000
TO:RTE 691 TOT 63~000
LENGTH:1.61 EAD 07 199~
ECD 06 1994
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
NEW PLANT MIX P.E. 0
0729-002- R/W 0
FR:0.7 M.N. RT.1120 CON 93,000
TO:RTE. 53 TOT 93,000
LENGTH:2.2 MI. EAD 07 1992
ECD 06 1993
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
NEW PLANT MIX P.E. 0 REVENUE SHARING $62,000
0738-002- R/W 0 1993-94
FR:RTE. 679 CON 62,000
TO:RTE. 250 TOT 62,000
LENGTH:1.5 MI EAD 07 1993
ECD 06 1994
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
NEW PLANT MIX P.E. 0 REVENUE SHARING $30,000
0788-002- R/W 0 1993-94
FR:RTE. 789 CON 30,000
TO:RTE. 684 TOT 30,000
LENGTH:0.28 MI. EAD 07 1993
ECD 06 1994
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
NEW PLANT MIX P.E. 0
0800-002- R/W 0
FR: RTE. 6 CON 71,000
TO: NELSON CO. LINE TOT 71,000
LENGTH: 1.4 MI. EAD 071992
ECD 06 1993
+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(In Dollars)
Page:
1
r
SECONDARY SYSTEM
COUNTY ~LBEMARLE CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Page: 2
RESIDENCY PHARLOTTESVILLE (In Dollars)
DISTRICT ~ULPEPER
----------~+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE I DESCRIPTION I ESTIMATED I I
LENGTH COST COMMENTS
----------~+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 0811~ PLANT MIX P.E. 0
TC: 96~ 0810-002- R/W 0
ID: FR:RTE. 674 W CON 49,000
CONTRACT TO:RTE. 672 W TOT 49,000
STATE LENGTH:1.2 MI. EAD 07 1992
( 3) ECD 06 1993
-----------+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 0000 PLANT MIX P.E. 0
TC: 0 COUNTY WIDE R/W 0
ID: APPLY PLANT MIX TO CON 800,000
CONTRACT SURFACE TREAT. RD. TOT 800,000
STATE EAD 07 1994
( 3) ECD 06 1998
-----------+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 0708 P.E. 75,000 REVENUE SHARING $100,000
TC: 8220708-002-241,C501 R/W 55,434 1988-89
ID: 8844 FR:0.14 M.E. RT. 631 CON 263,600
CONTRACT TO:0.07 M.W. RT.631 TOT 394,034
STATE LENGTH:0.21 EAD 05 1993 r
( 4) ECD 12 1993
-----------+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 0654 BARRACKS ROAD P.E. 150,475 REVENUE SHARING $600,000
TC: 17500 0654-002-242~C501 R/W 360,520 1988-89
ID: 9100 FR:ROUTE 140b CON 875,775
CONTRACT TO:ROUTE 656 TOT 1,386,770
STATE LENGTH:0.20 EAD 06 1992
( 5) ECD 04 1993
-----------+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 0631 MEADOWCREEK PARKWAY P.E. 390,000 EAD AND FINANCING BASED ON
TC: 0 0631-002-128,C502 R/W 2,250,000 COORDINATION WITH CITY PROJECT
ID:253C FR:NCL CH'VILLE CON 3,000,000 UOOO-104-102,C501
CONTRACT TO:CSX RAILROAD TOT 9,640,000
RS LENGTH:1.00 EAD 01 1999
( 6) ECD 10 2000 \
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06~1 MEADOW CREEK PARKWAY P.E. 75,000
TC: 0 0631-002-128,B612 R/W 0
ID: 253C BRIDGE OVER CON 725,000
CONTRACT MEADOWCREEK TOT 800hOOO
BRSOS EAD 01 199~
( 6) ECD 10 2000
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06"1 P.E. 82,000
TC: 4cO 0671-002-191,B646 R/W 0
ID: 250' BRIDGE OVER CON 840,000
CONTRACT MOORMANS RIV. TOT 922,000
BRSOS STR. NO. 6058 EAD 05 1992
( 7) SUFF. RATING 17.2 ECD 10 1993
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06.1 5TH ST. EXTENDED P.E. 550,000 REVENUE SHARING $1,000,000
TC: 79'40631-002-224,C502 R/W 1,851,5601992-93
ID: 418f FR:1.34 M.S. RT. 64 CON 3,660,606
CONTRACT TO:0.14 M.S. RT. 64 TOT 6,062,166
RS LENGTH:1.20 EAD 07 1992
( 8) ECD 12 1993
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06 8 P.E. 70,000 REVENUE SHARING $206,000
TC: 24 9 0678-002-223,C501 R/W 50,000 1993-94
ID: 414~ FR:ROUTE 250 CON 530,000
CONTRACT TO:0.20 M.N. RT. 250 TOT 650,000
STATE LENGTH:0.20 EAD 05 1993
( 9) ECD 12 1994
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 07113 HYDRAULIC ROAD P.E. 250,000 REVENUE SHARING $1,000,000
TC: 229~7 0743-002-153,C502 R/W 750,000 1994-95
ID: 881 FR:ROUTE 657 CON 1,565,000
CONTRACT TO:ROUTE 631 TOT 2,565,000
RS LENGTH:0.6 MI. EAD 06 1994
( 10) ECD 08 1995
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
"
.
SECONDARY SYSTEM
COUNTY ALBEMARLE
RESIDENCY CHARLOTTESVILLE
DISTRICT CULPEPER
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
I DESCRIPTION I ESTIMATED I I
LENGTH COST COMMENTS
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06~1 RIO ROAD P.E. 286,000 REVENUE SHARING $1,000,000
TC: 146f6 0631-002-185,C501 R/W 1,725,000 1995-96
ID: 241c FR:ROUTE 29 CON 1,739,696
CONTRACT TO:ROUTE 743 TOT 3,750,696
RS LENGTH:0.7 MI EAD 07 1995
( 11) ECD 10 1996
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06c1 TABOR STREET P.E. 30,000 REVENUE SHARING $65,000
TC: 17;0 0691-002-2346C501 R/W 45,000 1993-94
ID: 880~ INT. RTE. 24 CON 75,000
STATE FORCE AND INT. HIGH ST. TOT 150,000
STATE LENGTH:0.10 MI. EAD 02 1994
( 12) ECD 07 1994
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 08E 6 GREENBRIER DRIVE P.E. 250,000 REVENUE SHARING $1,000,000
TC: 0 0866-002-236,C501 R/W 200,000 1996-97
ID: 881~ FR:ROUTE 743 CON 1,284,325
CONTRACT TO:ROUTE 1455 TOT 1,734,325
RS LENGTH:0.69 MI. EAD 07 1996
( 13) ECD 07 1997
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 0 6 ~ 1 MEADOW CREEK PKY. P . E . 1 ,500 , 000
I TC: 0 0631~002-,C R/W 7,500,000
ID: FR:RIO ROAD CON 11,000,000
CONTRACT TO: RTE. 649 TOT 20,000,000
STATE LENGTH: 5.0 MI. EAD 01 2010
( 14) ECD 01 2013
-----------+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06~6 GEORGETOWN ROAD P.E. 100,000 REVENUE SHARING $500,000
TC: 135(0 0656-002- ,c R/W 350,000 1997-98
ID: FR:ROUTE 654 CON 550,000
CONTRACT TO:ROUTE 743 TOT 1,000,000
RS LENGTH:0.8 MI EAD 10 1997
( 15) ECD 10 1998
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06~1 P.E. 150,000 REVENUE SHARING $500,000
TC: 3~.1 0601-002-158,C501 R/W 500,000 1997-98
ID: 880 FR:ROUTE 250 CON 850,000
CONTRACT TO:RTE. 29 BYPASS TOT 1,500hOOO
RS LENGTH:0.7 EAD 10 199/
( 16) ,ECD 01 1999 I
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06J;9 AIRPORT ROAD P.E. 120,000
TC: 13411 0649-002-158,C501 R/W 250,000
ID: 245€ FR:ROUTE 29 CON 830,000
CONTRACT TO:ROUTE 606 TOT 1,200,000
RS LENGTH:0.83 MI. EAD 10 1999
( 17) ECD 05 2001
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06~1 P.E. 112,000
TC : 1 8 ~ 1 06 9 1 - 0 0 2 - , C R / W 2 1 3 , 000
ID: 111. 9 FR:ROUTE 240 CON 800,000
CONTRACT TO:ROUTE 684 TOT 1,125,000
RS LENGTH:1.5 MI. EAD 07 2000
( 18) ECD 10 2001
-----------+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06~1 P.E. 55,000
TC: H 9 0651-002- , B R/W 45,000
ID: BRIDGE OVER CON 400,000
CONTRACT CSX RAILROAD TOT 500,000
BRSOS STR. NO. 6124 EAD 07 2000
( 19) SUFF. RATING 6.0 ECD 10 2001
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06~7 RAILROAD CROSSING P.E. 3,000 REVENUE SHARING $100,000
TC: c30627-002-,S R/W 1,000 1993-94
ID: SIGNALS CON 96,000
CONTRACT AT WARREN TOT 100AOOO
RRP EAD 10 199~
( 20) ECD 06 1994
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(In Dollars)
Page:
3
ROUTE
r
.
SECONDARY SYSTEM
COUNTY ALBEMARLE CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Page: 4
RESIDENCY CHARLOTTESVILLE (In Dollars)
DISTRICT CULPEPER
---------~-+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE I DESCRIPTION I ESTIMATED I I
LENGTH COST COMMENTS
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06/32 P.E. 5,000
TC: 3n7 0682-002-p ,N501 R/W 0
ID: 881p RAILROAD CROSSING CON 95,000
RAILROAD CSX RAILROAD TOT 100,000
RRP LIGHTS & GATES EAD 07 1992
( 21 ) I ECD 1 0 1 9 9 3
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06e2 P.E. 80,000
TC: 3117 0682-002-P33,N501 R/W 20,000
ID: 8810 FR:ROUTE 250 CON 1,050,000
~~~~~ACT l~~dT~:~:~'M~:' 787 ~R6 01'1~~2000
( 21 ) I ECD 1 0 1 9 93
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06 0 P.E. 25,000
TC: 2p8 0610-002-p,N R/W 30,000
ID: B80e FR:ROUTE 20 CON 885,000
CONTRACT TO:1.8 MI.E. RT. 20 TOT 940,000
STATE LENGTH:1.8 EAD 07 1994 r
( 22) ECD 10 1995
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 07 2 P.E. 15,000
TC: 1p90712-002-P,N R/W 18,000
ID: 230 FR:RTE. 29 CON 417,000
CONTRACT TO:RTE. 692 TOT 450,000
STATE LENGTH:0.9 MI. EAD 07 1995
( 23) ECD 04 1996
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 07 1 P.E. 15,000
TC: 1 3 0711-002-P ,N R/W 15,000
ID: FR:RTE. 29 CON 320,000
CONTRACT TO:RTE. 712 TOT 350,000
STATE LENGTH:0.55 EAD 07 1996
( 24) ECD 04 1997
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 07 0 P.E. 15,000
TC: 1 8 0760-002-P,N R/W 15,000
ID: 111 3 FR:RTE. 710 CON 330,000
CONTRACT TO:RTE. 760 TOT 360,000
STATE LENGTH:0.60 MI. EAD 07 1996
( 25) ECD 03 1997
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 06 7 P.E. 25,000
TC: 1 0 0637-002-P,N R/W 30,000
ID: 111 5 FR:RTE. 635 CON 845,000
CONTRACT TO:0.55 M.W. RT. 682 TOT 900,000
STATE LENGTH:2.2 MI. EAD 07 1997
( 26) ECD 10 1998
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
ROUTE 07~ 9 P.E. 5,000
TC: 2,0 0759-002-P,N R/W 8,000
ID: 111 2 FR:RTE. 616 CON 197,000
CONTRACT TO:FLUVANNA CO. LINE TOT 210,000
STATE LENGTH:0.60 MI. EAD 07 1997
( 27) IECD 06 1998
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
--------- -+--------------------+---------------+------------------------------+
7-} C-}7
"" /:?
. ,._,:. . .,
ej'}', t/ /' t-'7~
1- i't'<""~.41t)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Develop
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902.4596
(804) 296-5823
rn:
I -.2~
~I.'- ~
M MORANDUM
T
F
BOARD OF suPElMSORS
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & community/~
Development UG
July 2, 1993
Intermodal Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) -
Transportation Enhancement Program
is program provides a means of financing activities that go
yond the normal elements of a transportation project. A unique
d innovative element of ISTEA is a set-aside for transportation
hancements. "The intent is to more creatively integrate
ansportation facilities into their surrounding communities and
e natural environment" (VDOT). Eligible activities are:
1 provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles;
2. Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic
sites;
3. Scenic or historic highway programs;
4 Landscaping and other scenic beautification;
5 Historic preservation;
6 Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation
buildings, structures, or facilities (including historic
railroad facilities and canals);
7. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the
conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle
trails);
8. Control and removal of outdoor advertising;
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors
Jl1ly 2, 1993
Pfige 2
9 Archeological planning and research;
1p. Mitigation of pollution due to highway run-off.
T~n percent of Virginia's Surface Transportation Program funds
w~ll be set aside for enhancements each year through 1996 (about
$~ million per year).
I~ March of this year, the Board of Supervisors endorsed a
p~iority list of project types to be funded under the enhancement
p~ogram. They are:
1. Beautification of entrance corridors (particularly Route 29
and Route 250) - landscaping, signage, undergrounding of
overhead utilities.
2. Construction of bikeway facilities as prioritized in the
Bicycle Plan for the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle
County (adopted by the Board of Supervisors as an element of
the Comprehensive Plan on July 17, 1991).
3. Development of a Thomas Jefferson Parkway along Route 53
from Route 20 to Monticello as recommended in the Blue Ridge
Neighborhood Study (amended into the Comprehensive Plan by
the Board of Supervisors on September 18, 1991).
4. Development of portions of the Rivanna River Greenway path
system.
5. Development of sidewalks/pathways as recommended in the
pedestrian Obstacles Study Phase II (1987).
6. Removal of non-conforming billboards.
T~e Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is now inviting
applications for funding under the enhancement program. Any
g~oup/individual may initiate enhancement projects, but they must
b~ endorsed and submitted by a local jurisdiction or public
a~ency with appropriate MPO endorsement. A minimum 20% local
m~tch of total project cost is required, which may come from
p~blic or private sources. Funding is competitive - applications
s~atewide will be evaluated and selected from one pool. The
d~adline for applications is August 1, 1993.
S~aff has received two (2) applications with supporting material
w~ich are enclosed. One is from the Keswick Garden Club for
spreening of CSX rail siding and yard at Keswick along Route 22.
~
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors
J ly 2, 1993
P ge 3
tal project cost is $86,000, of which the $17,200 local match
uld come from private sources. This project is consistent with
e County's first priority for enhancement projects. The second
plication is from the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation for
e Thomas Jefferson Parkway. It is a two phase project
taIling more than $4,500,000 ($2,970,490 Phase I; $1,615,120
ase II) of which the required local match would come from
ivate sources. This project is consistent with the County's
ird priority for enhancement projects.
public hearing has been advertised as required by VDOT for
dnesday, July 14 to receive comment on each request. Should
e County endorse either or both projects, it must pass a
p oject endorsement resolution (sample attached) to be forwarded
w'th the application to VDOT. It is important to note that
a though both applications are from private interests offering
t e full match from non-county sources, the County is
g aranteeing local funding by its resolution of endorsement
s ould one or both projects be funded. In effect, the County
w'll be the "middle-man" between the applicant and VDOT. This
w'll require agreement between the County and the applicant with
s rety of some form. This will also required the County
a inister the project locally to assure state requirements are
m t in the expenditure of the funding. It is nearly impossible
t estimate the administrative burden that might pose to the
C unty, but because this is the first time utilizing this funding
s urce, experience would indicate the time commitment in this
f'rst year will be greater than in subsequent years. As a
m asure of comparison, this Department's Community Development
Bock Grant administration has required up to 10% of one person's
t'me.
C/jcw/mem
,.
-'
?l
. ,
,'.'3
project Endorsement
Resolution
(SAMPLE)
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth
Transportation Board construction allocation
procedures, it is necessary that a request by reso-
lution be received from the local government or
state agency in order that the Virginia Department
of Transportation program an enhancement proj-
ect in the (jurisdiction) .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the
(local jurisdiction or state agency) , requests the
Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish
a project for the improvement of (name/description
of project) .
BE IT RJRTHER RESOLVED, that the (loealgov-
ernment or state agency) hereby agrees to pay 20 per-
cent of the total cost for planning and design, right
of way, and construction of this project, and that,
if the (jurisdiction or agency) subsequently elects to
cancel this project, the (jurisdiction or agency)
hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Depart-
ment of Transportation for the total amount
of the costs expended by the Department
through the date the Department is notified of
such cancellation.
Adopted this _ day of
,19_
, Virginia
BY (CEO o/jurisdiction/agency)
Attest
-~
.
/)/51 7/1<1/93
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
ill
~3BI~: ~ m
JU"
"
, L-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
July 12, 1993
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors
A bemarle County Office Building
4 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, V A 2290 I
August Submittal ISTEA Enhancement Projects
s. Humphris and Gentlemen:
T e Architectural Review Board received a presentation on Tuesday July 8, 1993, from Mr.
rchibald Craig for an enhancement project at the intersection of Route 22 and Route 744, and
f m the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation for a parkway/bikeway/park plan.
T e recommendation of the ARB to the Board of Supervisors is to endorse these projects. Mr.
C aig and the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation should be commended for their efforts
t preserve and enhance the historic character peculiar to Albemarle County.
r. Craig's project is located within the Keswick area which is a uniquely pristine rural area
i Albemarle County. It is an area where through the voluntary actions of private landowners
t ousands of acres have been preserved in perpetuity through the use of conservation easements.
T e project proposed is on a state scenic By-Way and an Entrance Corridor. It is located on
t e edge of the Southwest Mountain Rural Historic District, which is one of the largest such
d stricts in the United States. This enhancement project would significantly improve the
c aracter of what is virtually the only blighted section of Route 22/231. It would do so with
r latively little cost and a guarantee of private support of at least 20% of this cost.
T e project proposed by the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation would provide an
o portunity for tourists and residents to appreciate the vistas and environment enjoyed by
Tomas Jefferson on his journey from Monticello to Charlottesville. This would be an
i provement that would substantially enhance and protect those other qualities which are not
o ly of county wide significance, but also of national significance. It is also significant as a
c rridor accessing Monticello, and an Entrance Corridor. The Monticello project is
e traordinarily well planned and although of substantial cost, is justified by the singular
.'
l
I TEA Enhancements
RB Endorsements
J ly 12, 1993
portance of Monticello to Albemarle as well as the rest of the world.
e urge the Board of Supervisors to endorse these enhancement projects and send a strong
essage of support to the Virginia Department of Transportation for both projects.
'/~~
,~t{~vflr
~ "";)~
, ne Miller ~~,_
embers of the Architectural Review Board
~
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board
construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be
received from the local government or state agency in order that the Virginia
Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in Albemarle
County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby request the
Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project for the screening of
the CSX rail siding and yard at Keswick along Route 22, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Keswick Garden Club (on
behalf of Albemarle County) does hereby agree to pay twenty percent of the total
cost for planning and design, right of way, and construction of this project, and
that if Albemarle County subsequently elects to cancel this project, Albemarle
County hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for
the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the
Department is notified of such cancellation.
Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
Attest:
By(/J~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
f;~uJt~1
Clerk <:::J'
Date: July 14. 1993
-
()a/&~ If~wIJ7/rl14~ ~1h_
.trWik ~ ft;:~d 1/ /afUtwt-~
. ~ . =...cIMSOIIS
1 ~~tiU~
Jj ~ t?hv ~ , ~. .' · u:l.. r.
o/ltlA1'L ,b)~1-{f tlJ';Uf 0( dfo/L~
~~~J}~A~~~~~~~
~iu,~, l~~/~
1- AtfL'!' f:l~ ~ (bd1hr>1)~
. f!Ivw tf.w:L~/tUYtj N~ ~1-~ ~
A- ~ ~~ .9 A,.~{~i:tZ~A
~ . tgtJ ~ 1i412~ M?'} ~ I~Y;?{U1/Lo4( . L{
{f:/L 'te~~ A!f #2.~ d#!L1.~:d~ k ~ ~fl,
'1 1io1rJr;1..()(/l.uw.IA'~ IJ"--i ,( .(~L .-tt/hLB-U(2u,'f
~ '- A ~ 1 ~ ~ /U/jfW!4lLA de~ !zJ9~',
t!. f1 ^VLl~v ,Yo ~, t.z 4Af 1 'f;uu~&( ~,'~
ff) '~A1c~~ fI'l1A,;/~~._~. "
, ,. !J;-JU1J;L(jcdifLJ,tJzuaf'~?l j<~'<P~-~z.J4'
Yt'Vt J!/fY!dtua{flt-, dlX<c M1" ~'M~ -t.-Uvd~ /;"'W'h....
t2:tk ~ ~/4 ~ il4, 0/ fJk ,
idee AM~ ~;l.(' !Aa~~
A.<<(~' #t ,Pl4~ ~
A11~~ '",
~J~i h{(f~~
.' .
ARCHIBALD CRAIGE
EAST BELMONT
KESWICK, V A
22947
,ru 'Ll'~ r9 tt:3
.
,Comm nwealth of Virginia
APPLICATION FORM FOR CANDIDATE PROJECT
h2.19V7. ~dit(;jd.W7Wt ~.
I/~ l.2~ Y
.2.~f ~7
10
l~
Projec Size
s
~~
, 1/ t1J
Ion
)) ocation map}:
+~~~
NUMBER of this project is I The total number of projects submitted /
H.... I e local government bodies officially supported/endorsed this proj ~/. ves.b"\ No 0
If "Yes' attach documentation of support. Also document support from a =IiC interest groups or
organiz tions.
If "No" ttach comments from local government,
6. PROJE T CONSTRUCTION/IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE (month i:if:arJ
Begin ~gn tz;r/~
~ /'7Yl ~h;{J ..<,
Estimat completion date of project
Continued
7. OWNERSHIP Who will own/maintain the completed project?
C ~ I2~J ~1f'YJr1L~f(UJ}(ltllc)J
~-
;/
~"G. I
~
8. ESTIMATED COST OF THE PROJECT
Total project cost
$
8'~ (j[) {J
,
Total Non-federal participation
$ /~ ..lad
(minimum 20% of cost)
~
..
Non-federal Funds Status
List of Source{s) (confirmed/anticipated) Amount
~~ ... /7,1-tJlJ
~ Z. ~M'lk.Z4''I
Utility Relocation
=f~
~ Bt,OOO.
Describe in detail any tangible in-kind match you propose for the match requirement '
t~ ~ ektAJ#-{(ft~rYJlb I tlL_ ftV\
.. J W. A / /'" A _ _ " 4 . ~-t A /)
u..-<J V{/t:~/YnA-f!./ C~{/)1./.1 /~
$
$ I. () 0 () .
$ 3. cr&lJ
$ 45, OM
CS/~
4/~/o(Jo. j-~~e7f/J ~~J-/-.
6 000 d/~..:'nM1J ~~
(f:~~ ~ ~
/0 000 ~~~ ~
io~ ~v/~~~
(p J lX1 (; /I-nV1-' ~
Project cost breakdown (sub-totals):
Planning and Design
<3
Land Acquisition
Construction/Implementation
~t
9. BENEFITS ~ ~~ ~~ :&'1
How does the candidate project support the eligible category and satisfy the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
definition for Transportation Enhancement Activities? Please address benefits and public use anticipated. Use additional 8%
x 11 sheets if needed,
(Responsible Person) A"J _ _ '_
.~
o
Date c;-/d - 13
MAILING ADDRESS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Please mail five copies of your completed application package to the following address:
Mr. D. L. Eure
Programming and Scheduling Division
Virginia Department of Transportation
1401 East Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Please mark all attachments with project name and location.
atflAudtul-n/ e>6 ~fciJ'h)' {;V,; 9,
YW~::: ~~;~~~~;;::;J~4~bPJD
STFA ~'C~!Tr1, · :' ,
, ~ '(A& /0~d. ~-1/1 /4 ,
--Vh~~~ ~ ~ IAh C -.I)' ;9AAZv/-j- ~4 flV.f
~~~: d/ Ij//P{/~~~ ~jJll~\~Ai' ~1J4~e-"~~j~
n;;~:;~;~;:J;;;;~~~~ '.
u/J M14jJ~i1J:&" ~ f7zdj:' Ur, ~-'- .~ AAt MVli/-o!i4>l
~ N ~~a04 7'0 4.,~ 'd~~u<-i~ '1 ~
~k ~';f/-Wh./.~r10~.&~.,.6.YbA~.... ~~
" f4 p1v&~,r ~/{ ~;f- 1<%1',<
&iJ.. .h-~ M. ~ j);~udi/ JL- ~~ 9f
c!N-IY1A14 !)~~M; , Ri- ~ :< M. 4/"~,;U&/~-.( /I. ul /~ {lieu 4ro1'fi~
~~\Vo ~(}ni{adt}-~~~-1-!JJoi~~,d;; ~-c
~ ,iJl~-{,,~(;LJ~~~iUM~tft4
~~: ~ ~{ ~~fdz ~~/MJ-.~fku/rdl;P'1 ftwe
m,J2.:; h' /z)/o .&M:! ~rn~ ~t ~ J'u.tl ,
, ~ IJAuAN-k, ~jlM~. ~ ~ / &~
.~ ~ ~} (!0i&J //)AI w~</ .
. ,lA.u. ~ .12/WJ~~J f!I!t !fi.u.un.1tuc~/\I."'A .11
~LL /Z~ ) jiMY~'.( / w/!j:1AJJLt 4h-~ /?-L(i1;A/L~1
~'2/t;z~,
. ,
i
,,,
,---.J \.~ ....
'-1 ~::::::=
,
"'\
~ oil
oJ
3 .~
~
\1 "
l::
:t.
l- ~
t.
:J
.l=
'1.
\J
3
~
-
\ /~
~L '..L~
\
UI ..1
~
-. ~
~
'\
>-
~ \.l
'f, 3 0
V \J ~
...-
3 fu
~ t- j
r ~
Y.. :J
- 1: -~
\ ~ ro-
.
()
~ ~
I I
1-:' \J
~ -
\ ~
'. ~
\
'.I..
\
/
I
I
I h
f
!~
r_1-
~
~
j
_a
~
~
J~J
IiIr..
c~s
~~1
~
~f~
-~ ~ ~
!.
~~
~~
3UJ
[f.
o~
to
~(
\)
----/
, ~
~
3 t i
w 0 \)
~ ~
c~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ -~ -~
if -Q ~ '";
~ , ~
c(} 4) .
. '"",
I'"' r-
6' t 0
t ~
'~ ~
v}-~ ~
~~2 ~
I L-> ~
uJ 11J ~,
~~ q
UJ ~ ~~
aO- 1lJ~
6 c.I
~><~ ~~
z:(})~ In
<U" It
~1
.. "..'
ARCHIBALD CRAIGE
EAST BELMONT
KESWICK, V A
22947
~Ji3-itD ':j /
J~/~ /P~3
~ ~~~- ~
~ ~ "OlJ'fV/~ /J j ,_ .If
~1. / J A}A~tf rRt,-jf1~~!/A't--
,/ ~ ~ ahJ;17tTVf:f}M ~ j!.st ~'~ 1M !fA .
I ~,f.1:J. 'J/tDI ~ Vi..
'~ :; , W1f6--Mtf ~ ~ 1JvL~Vt/~(
~p" - Aft1/: Vikfll/o; &.v3--~1Jdo~'0
t v:;;;:;;- ~ cP- ct ~~r&vT
fJt1-0 ~ ~ 1 r/l~,h ~ ,(?J- )Mj ~ JV/'.
.ul I ~k~~~/~q~~cJt-, ~
~ l.M^'rJ~~ Ow, ~~m<;~
' ~~~ t;b It ~1ttl1M&4~o"
~~ J?~~A.e%~~~~~
" ~ !iJ-4,~~fhat)jM-~~~/
1 ~~~~~.
, C~I ~~~~;u ~~.
{f r 1Ctrio ~ ~ 0 70 1) ct ~~ AJdL tfu~/)~.
.:i, ~ " tiU1;L ~ /!,; ~ ~ (It ~ '/ /l4VJt1/l1/L
IltM ' ~tfn~~~Lt-L~~,~
ejtt;- -Ml;~ ~ I 14/}6~~ ~W; ~ {f1<~lU d/ ~
k. ~ -'t Aj1ft-~ ~ l' ~ &ilti ~ '
ee: fA,,- a{,ttdvc/d ~ ~//Jd//I?:r/1~/r1 ..-:
-
--- .
, -
., '..
: .,:". ~:l-'-~[~~trH?,}l~:r~!~"~/~~1., ;::1
", ,',","\
':.:' ,"
\;-'1'
t,~-:.,tfl<:"
~, ~i - "
project Endorsement
Resolution
,~
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth
Transportation Board construction allocation
procedures, it is necessary that a request by reso- '.
lution be received from the local government or
state agency in order that the Virginia Department
OfTransp~rtati~n pro ram an enh~c~O}e.pt proj- f) .
ect in the CJA. NT.J.t.. ~ ~
MP.'A~
..O,dV .y{
_ . ,NOW. TfIEREFO~, BE IT RESOLVED, that the T:J~. r
~ t&.~, requests the
Commonwealth Transportation Board jQ establish
a pro!ect fo~ the improv~ment of Cf X ~-1-'
A~.Mv I\~I V~ ~~~f-:J.;1..
r '
BE IT FORTIIER RESOLVED, that.ate ~ UM...-r
OJ!\~ r L hereby agrees to pay 20 per-
cent of the total cost for planning and design, right
of way.-,.ID~ construction of this project, and that,
if the f3J 1. ~subs.e_qu_e!1tJLt;le~~t~
cancel this project, the' ..
hereby agreei to reimburse the Virginia Depart-
ment of Transportation for the total amount
of the costs expended by the Department
through the date the Department is notified of
such cancellation_
Adopted this _ day of
,19_
, Virginia
BY
Attest
..-
,.
.. ", I
~ ~-f/(A .
mJj tVLL/ bkf ~ ~/
, " ..Mh~' JI;-I~~A'.!,~ I~
. O'i . vif-' .. /)J~'
M..,4l1Yr' 1Ae~ ~ ~~.,
hYv ~ dAAM)h, r' At ~ ~ .:A ;.", {l1<<
'-ft^ -ruA. ~ I . j}" i
w~~JJ ~r- Vtu ~'VJ..lA'f~JJ
~ I ~ J ~!fft, 1lAJA}-( ~
CID ti{) M. ~ ~) nM. ~U/Mt"
, ~ M-- ftiD, (.k ?"~ ~h/r\.~~ ~ ~ r
,. tLL i .t1 / ~ ^ H ..I Jk~ ;vU/V'v~' - ;/ ~I ,r~
,c;4( a - - 'I,A.Lt.,.", c:-t,'(A. (i (J/i'l./{j -v ~l .) . VV J
~ 'tr ~ (lS) (Lo.-J~~d-'d'
~~~/fM '. ,
7"{A.-v.! ~'I., tf. :0 ~
~ rf) ..' ttP-~
J~ ~ -N / Ih ~. d ~[}A-.t.ct..
~" 7'a ~ fll-MA ~ ~-u/,-'
~? /~~f~jLD
~d4 4~0
. .
.f
~
-
.
c}une 8th. 1 C)9:~
Mr. David Bowerman. Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Charlottesville, Virginia
Dear Mr. Bowerman"
This letter purports to endorse the proposed project
to screen the CXS industrial rail yard and siding adjacent and
contingent to state Route 22, about 1/2 mile West of the
Keswick Post Office in Albemarle County.
This much needed program is well planned in a
professional manner and will enhance the natural beauty of this
lovely country-side.
Attached hereto is our formal resolution of
endol~sement .
Very Truly Yours.
--3;r ~e-d C. -U~J...n_vu
Pr-esi dent, L 771/W. -!rz1...."'lk;,.;t:,
~~eswic~( Ga~den CILJb /
." ._c
-"P
.
Ext~act of Minutes of a Meetino of the Keswick Garden Club
on June 8th, 1993.
Whereas in accordance with the Commonwealth Transportation
Board Construction Application procedures, it is
necessary that a request by resolution be ~eceived from a
local o~gan~zation to screen the CSX industrial rail
yard and siding in Keswick, Vi~ginia in Albemarle Country
which borders scenic Highway Route 22.
Now therefo~e be it ~esolved the Keswick Garden Club
requests the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors and the
Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project
for imp~ovement of the afore said plan.
Adopted this 8th day of June, 1993
Keswick Garden Club
Albemarle County, Virginia
... ..#
6737 Southpoint Drive, South
Suite 100, SIC J915
Jacksonville, FL 32216
(904) 2794540
Telefax (904) 2794581
-
..
Mr. rchibald Craige
P.O. Box 45
Kesw ck, VA 22947
e: Lease Proposal at Keswick. Albemarle County. VA
Dear Mr. Craige:
This refers to your January 11 meeting with Manny Spunt and Ray Cope regarding
your interest in leasing certain property owned by CSX Transportation, Inc.
loca ed between CSXT's operating tracks and State Route 22 at Keswick, for the
purpose of planting and maintaining landscaping.
find enclosed a fragment copy of our valuation map V-2 (102) showing the
we believe to be of interest highlighted in yellow, along with a sample
f our standard (30) day tenant-at-will Lease Agreement Form 3014.
we certainly appreciate your intentions, we hope that you can understand
ed to cover this use with an appropriate rent-bearing Agreement and the
o review your plans, prior to entering into same.
ng you wish to proceed, please submit your plans to Ray Cope_and myself
r consideration, keeping in mind that all plantings / activity should be
a 0 eet from the closest railroad track and must not obstruct tne
view t any grade crossi~
If yo have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Since ely,
~ ~-~
Hannan
cc: E. Spunt - CSXT - Richmond, VA \~
I
I
./
i
p-l. - 8' 8" G, I (0
CS"< ('o3Q EO
V A {...L.~ '( 1" \ ti\ 'e r0-
c 5-AL-e.S J jNC,
'.. ...
UJ
0-
0-
U
Z
o
u
.
cO
:T
v
o:t
I
o
U")
-+
~
o
~ ~ h
~/7 ~'\.~.
~~~."J
~~':J,'?
~
,><~o ~o.
~
?
Iv
~
~
to
-t'
cO
It'I
-t
~
-
r
~
6
\0
...
-
-
in
If)
cJ
J'l
~
0-
..,;
\/\
o
-+
C\J
:::
No. \~
~\\O
,
...
,/.
"/f
. \
,f-
Ir
~
d
~
~
(
cst> - ~ O"L
7-ltl-CJt
Co#NOiVIJ
~DPltIf/E
SAU;: lAk:t",
r~~.%
/J, C CJ.
c:::..sK
~~~
~I
l-
Ul
o
0-
~
...J
~~
:it?
~o
6'0
1Sl.,.
4.
~
.0
04'
...
,
~
0-
..-
~.
v
ct
A/
'Q>.r
'C
~
.r-
~
~
;.,
'<.9
.r>
~
-z.
'J
:'
i
: \
f 'J
, 'r' .
J
I
w ,,~t-
/ I
\.
;(
')
&
Lr
I
:r
.,.
i <;C.
-
-
6'
~
o
IP
ILl
~
o
~
~~
u,1-
"ei-
~6'
ylt"
\9~
~\
"":::.
r~
-
C1
~x
oj
6'
(\
'1>
"'"
(~
..c)
~
f"
~
""
.J,
"?/~
1-~ Is-
oj/<,s):
6' 'J..q}-/.
~ o1t
<f .J
~ :~6"
il'/ }t (;'
"4)o/;s
~ C'. 1t
-f.o'
;so V~.
;SO/A. '1
'Y9 '
-
.. -
..-
"'"
r
...
C.
J'l
~
N
----. - ._*--_._,__ .-JI~__
iCSX EXHIBIT A
~sx T
rL\.""",,- 4.
k . -- ' f .Q."r ~4+i. 0'"
e:!o "'"' I c..K A \ ..... '
f> I l!.......c...'C"\c...
~o. L.~""'se.. _ ' v ~
--
SCALE. ,"
. =~OC'
DATE: ~\
DRAWN: (. lS\ "\~
S')r. Rrr
BASE:
CONTOUR:
REVISED:
e:.~s -
\~'SO
. ,
,\:! /. '!l~~
+;I~!fr'
I .~ ..::
,cr-"- -, .
~.~" \~
~--l-..,' ....
~~-,-~~
~/.'.: /, '.-,.if'. :',
;J;r.
~~/ .
'11
I
, I
. .
.~~;;.
.. "'':;
: - .- ...
h'.... ..,~~. ,_
'1~:t~.>>~.-t:
~~.t'.~", . .. ~
.... 'ta.- {'
'~~ i"
:.I:$'
~<<~l" '
""
"'t~:;; :~
,.
,. "'~i';t,...
~ ~-., ..... ~ .
.'"
": ~ ~':~fl':J
, '~~l:
:i~
.tt-::.
,; , ., r,I
/)H' '~,l
I. ,I "
~~, { ;;'~
"r~
1.1 , ,4
'1 I . J"I J
I .. I I!
I
'I
jl't
I
f\'
..
.1
(!~
"
r,tr~
,
"
J'
~. ~w;.~-':
,II i .~
I,:~.~. '
".:1
.~*
'*
" I,
"
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board
construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution
be received from the local government or state agency in order that the
Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in
Albemarle County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby request the
Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project for the
improvement of The Thomas Jefferson Parkway (U.S. Route 53), and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Thomas Jefferson Memorial
Foundation (on behalf of Albemarle County) hereby agrees to pay twenty
percent of the total cost for planning and design, right of way, and
construction of this project, and that if Albemarle County subsequently elects
to cancel this project, Albemarle County hereby agrees to reimburse the
Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs
expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of
such cancellation.
Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
Attest:
By")4t?~
aVIO P. Bowerman, ChaIrman
tikIJ {~
Clerk ~
Date: July 14. 1993
wealth of Virginia
ancement
R 0 G RAM
APPLICATION FORM FOR CANDIDATE PROJECT
ANT (Group, Agency, etc.) Name and Address:
as Jefferson Memorial Foundat,ion
--
,.
@
Project Title:
Tbe Tho~as Jeffers
Project Size (Size of Project/Acreage):
Project Location
(Includ Streets, County and Municipalities:)
State Route 53 from State
Roadside safety and aesthetic
20 to the Monticello entrance
improvements, pedestrian and bicycle
gate, in Albemarle Count
access to Monticello Park, and park/
(add additional pages as needed) arb 0 r e t um d ev e 1 0 pm e n t
NUMBER of this project is
1
The total number of projects submitted
1
local government bodies officially supported/endorsed this project?
Yes 0
No 0
If "Yes' attach documentation of support. Also document support from any other civic or public interest groups or
organiz tions.
If "No" ttach comments from local government.
T CONSTRUCTION/IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE (month and year)
PHASE I
Begin 0 c t 0 b e r. 1 9 9 3
PHASE II
October, 1994
nstruction/lmplementation
March, 1994
March, 1995
completion date of project
October, 1995
October, 1996
Continued
7. OWNERSHIP Who will own/maintain the completed project?
ThOTTIrlC; Tpffprc;on Mpmori;:\l FOllnrlation
8, ESTIMATED COST OF THE PROJECT
PHASE I
PHASE II
Total Non-federal participation
$ ?,Q7n,490
$ 594,098
(minimum 20% of cost)
~15,120
Total project cost
323-,024
-
Non-federal Funds
List of Source(s)
Status
(confirmed/ anticipated)
Thomas Jefferson Memorial
Foundation
confirmed
PHASE I Amount PHASE II
$594,098 $1?1,0?4
$ -1-9JL~ P
PHASE II
_J. 30,000
Project cost breakdown (sub-totals):
Planning and Design
PHASE I
Land Acquisition
$ 594,098
Utility Relocation
$ 200,000
450,000
Construction/Implementation
$1 , 98 6 , 1 9 ?
1,035,120
Describe in detail any tangible in-kind match you propose for the match requirement.
The Thomas Jefferson Hemori::d FOllnnrlt';on T.rill C'omll1it $594,098 for Phaoe I,
and $323,024 for Phase II in cash, land transactions, easements, or other
eligible forms defined in ISTEA legislation
'9. BENEFITS
How does the candidate project support the eligible category and satisfy the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
definition for Transportation Enhancement Activities? Please address benefits and public use anticipated, Use additional 8V2
x 11 sheets if needed, See the a t t a c h e d Con c e p t u alP 1 a n for the Tho mas J e E fer son
Parkway.
10. SIGNAT~.7n) c.Jo
(f Ao0.M-J
Daren /, / 973
MAILING ADDRESS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Please mail five copies of your completed application package to the following address:
Mr. D. L. Eure
Programming and Scheduling Division
Virginia Department of Transportation
1401 East Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Please mark a/l attachments with project name and location
~c~/;rt/ 7-//'--0
Date: 14 July, 1993
To: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
From: Tom Olivier, representing Citizens for Albemarle
Re: Support for Thomas Jefferson Parkway funding proposal
My name is Tom Olivier
Citizens for Albemarle. We urge
support the application by
Foundation for support under
and I am speaking on behalf of
that Albemarle County strongly
the Thomas Jefferson Memorial
the Commonwealth of Virginia's
Transportation Enhancement Program.
At present, the segment of Rt. 53 that stretches from Rt. 20
to Michie Tavern is heavily travelled, utilitarian and bordered
by pine plantations. There has been some contention in recent
years over appropriate uses of land in this area.
Various
members
of
our
organization
have attended
presentations by Monticello regarding its proposal for the Thomas
Jefferson Parkway. We have all come away strongly impressed by
the thoughtfulness and thoroughness of the proposal.
We believe that implementation of their plan would enhance
the esthetics and safety of this segment of Rt. 53. It contains
features that would protect and perhaps enhance wildlife along
the road. Establishment of the Parkway also would settle
constructively related land use issues.
"A fu.nww tal'ern of the 17005"
m 0 \VJ ~ r;\1
.. '1 ~ \
II;' 1;:911 llt.!!
'NL~L)
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HISTORIC MICHIE TAVERN
July 12, 1993
Mr. David P. Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va. 22901-4596
Dear David:
On behalf of the Board of Directors at Michie Tavern,
we want to express our unanimous support for the proposed
Thomas Jefferson Parkway improvements. It has long been our
contention, along with others, that the entrance corridor
to the area attractions lacked the scenic and natural beauty
the visitors expect. We are thrilled that plans to improve
the present conditions are underway, and we intend to support
the proposed project both conceptually and financially.
Should the proposed hiking and bicycling trail cross
Michie Tavern's property, we are willing to provide unrestricted
access to the mutually agreed upon route. We intend to work
with the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation in any way possible
to bring these improvements to fruition.
I am writing you this letter since I will not be able to
attend the Board of Supervisor's public hearing on July 14, 1993,
due to a conflict. If I can be of any additional assistance
with this matter, please contact me.
Respectfully,
G'~~
sec~y, Michie
Corp.
GLM/jg
cc: Mr. Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Route 21, Box 112, Charlottesville, Va. 22902 (804) 977~1234
Albemarle County Historical Society
Offia ,,,,,I Museum
220 Court Square. Charlottesville, V A 22902 . (804) 296-1492
Lib,..,"!!
Charlottesville-Albemarle Historical Collection
opmlled in ptlTtneTShip with Jtffrrson-Mtulison Regicnud Libr/lry
201 E. Market Street. Charlottesville, V A 22902 . (804) 296-7294
rn
JJl I 2 1993
ill
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
9 July 1993
M . David Bowerman, Chairman
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors
4 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, VA 22902
D ar Mr. Bowerman:
The Albemarle County Historical Society enthusiastically endorses
t e proposal developed by the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation to
c eate a genuine parkway connecting Monticello to the Visitors Center
o Route 20.
The parkway plan achieves several desirable ends for the public
god:
· it permanently protects in an appropriate way a critical path
to significant historical resources -- not only Monticello, but
also Ash Lawn-Highland and Michie Tavern
· it will be an educational resource for people of all ages
· it provides a recreational opportunity free and accessible to
the general public, yet costs for maintenance once it is
constructed will be funded by private resources
· it improves the safety of a difficult section of roadway
travelled regularly by visitors unfamiliar with it
· it can be promoted as yet another amenity in efforts to attract
tourism, with its many economic benefits, to the county
T e Society can see only positive benefits resulting from successful
i plementation of these plans and is hopeful that the funding being
s ught by the Foundation can be achieved. We urge the Board of
S pervisors to lend its approval.
Sincerely,
~~.~
fames E. Wootton
President
~ ,.;" <. .' I ~ : r" :' ,
'l/9 t33
q'?J, 0(114 ,it/0
'-of'..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept, of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
Ju e 9, 1993
'lli
, m f'
1
JJf-glBi
Mr Steve Runkle
Fo est Lakes Associates
Po t Office Box 5207
Ch rlottesville, VA 22905
tB~RD OF SUPERVIS~RS
RE ZMA-93-07 - Forest Lakes Associates
De r Mr. Runkle:
Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
e 9 1993, unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted
ition to the Board of Supervisors with the existing proffers
ZMA-91-04 to remain in effect on the property zoned PUD.
ase be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
1 review this petition and receive public comment at their
ting on July 14, 1993. Any new or additional information
arding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the
rd of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled
ring date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above
no ed action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Si 'if):11I
hard E. Tarbell
ior Planner
cc ~. Ella Carey
Tom Gale
Joseph Farinholt
. '
.
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
RICHARD E. TARBELL
JUNE 8, 1993
JULY 14, 1993
ZMA-93-07 - FOREST LAKES ASSOCIATES
Petition: Forest Lakes Associates petitions the Board of
Supervisors to rezone 2.3 acres from R-1, Residential to PUD,
Planned Unit Development and 2.6 acres from PUD to R-1
Residential to facilitate the exchange of land between the Forest
Lakes South PUD and an adjacent property. Property, described as
Tax Map 46 Parcels 26E and 26F, is located in the eastern portion
of the development (Block C). This property is located in the
Rivanna Magisterial District.
Character of the Area: Clearing and grading has commenced for
the construction of the spine road and Block A of Phase I.
Specifically, the 4.9 acres involved in this petition is
comprised of a 2.6 acre ridge of primarily deciduous trees and a
2.3 acre area of primarily evergreen trees with gently rolling
slope.
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL:
.
The rezoning is requested to facilitate the exchange of land
between Forest Lakes Associates (Parcel 26E) and Joseph Farinholt
(Parcel 26F). The exchange is occurring because of the
topography of these two parcels. Mr. Farinholt will be adding
land southwest of his property to the center of an unnamed stream
and Forest Lakes South will be adding a portion of a ridge
located in the southeast corner of the Farinholt property (see
map - Attachment A).
PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY:
On October 16, 1991 the Board of Supervisors approved a petition
to rezone 236.212 acres from R-1, Residential and PUD, Planned
Unit Development to PUD (Proffer) with a limit of 1200
residential units. This property consists of Tax Map 46 Parcels
26E, 27, 97A, and 110 (see Attachment C). This approval is
subject to proffers included herein as Attachment D.
Subsequently, in August, 1992 the Board approved the applicant's
request to limit the development to 800 units with the remaining
proffers unchanged. The preliminary plat for Phase I of Forest
Lakes South was approved by the Planning Commission on September
15, 1992.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: This property is located in a designated
growth area and is recommended for Medium Density Residential in
the Community of Hollymead.
.
1
.'
STAFF COMMENT:
staff op1n1on is this is a simple boundary adjustment and there
is no impact on surrounding properties occasioned by this
request. staff recommends approval of ZMA-93-07 with the
existing proffers to remain in effect on the property zoned PUD.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Tax Map
B - Location Map
C - Tax Map with PUD Boundary
D - Existing Proffers
E - Plat
.
.
2
.'
.45
.
I ATTACHMENT A I
'"
..
· 47
SCALI: IN 'U T
...
62
CHARLOTTESVI LLE
AND RIVANNA DISTRICTS
SECTION '46
I ATTACHMENT B I
c
o
(j
0"
, ..q.....
of!'
"~I
,....."'<r."
!'.>~
,~&~ Co
~ (j
1\1,.
,.
~
~
~
':l
.....
~
o
"
.
C...,.. Mtf'l
"
+'
~
IATTACHMENT cl
.
.
..
,
,..
~
47
w
w.
..
ZMA-91-'04
Lakes Associates
.
'46
sc.w..r. we 'UT
&2.
CHARLOTTESVILLE
AND RIVANNA DISTRICTS
SECTION 46
.
I ATTACHMENT 0 I \ Page 1 \
'.~'--'"
r d(!R'~~{):
\'\~r
"~~'
COUNTY or: !'\U3[jvl/\f\LE
l)cpl of PI,11l1l111~! I\.: COIl1'11IIIlIIV Dcvcl<lpnll'111
t10 \ 1v\(I11II1<' I\o"d
Ch,lrlolll:Sv:lk, VII'J"1\.\ :::':')() 1:\:1')11
(00'1) ~')() :1:";:'::\
January 17, 1992
Forest Lakes Associates
P. O. Box 5207
Charlottesville, VA 22905
..
RE: ZMA-91-04 Forest Lakes Associates
Tax Map 46, Parcels 26E, 27, 97A, 98 and 110
Dear Sir:
.
The Albemarle County Board of supervisors, at its meeting on
October 16, 1991, approved the above-noted request to rezone
236.212 acres from R-l and PUD to PUD (Proffer). Property
borders Southern Railroad on the east, Rt. 643 on the south,
Rt. 29 on the west and Hollymead subdivision on the north.
Please note that this approval is subject to proffers
included as pages V-l and V-2 in booklet entitled lIForest
Lakes South Rezoning Applicationll dated June 17, 1991,
amended August 13, 1991, signed by Frank A. Kessler, General
Partner; Proffers in letter dated September 17, 1991,
addressed to Ronald S. Keeler, Chief of Planning, signed by
stephen N. Runkle; and Proffers in letter dated October 16,
1991, addressed to V. Wayne cilimberg, Director of Planning
and community Development, signed by stephen N. Runkle, and
as amended verbally and agreed to by Mr. Runkle at the
Board's meeting on october 16, 1991:
1.
The development of the residential portion of t~e
property shall not exceed 1200 dwelling units,
provided, however, that once the density exceeds 800
dwelling units, the owner shall contribute at the time
a certificate of occupancy is issued for each dwelling
unit in excess of 800 units the sum of $1000.00 per
unit to an escrow fund to be established by Albemarle
County to either expand the capacity of Hollymead
Elementary School or to construct a new school in the
.
.
I ATTACHMENT 01
I Page 2\
Forest Lakes Associates
Page 2
January 17, 1992
northern area of the County of Albemarle, virginia, or
other items in the Albemarle County Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) related to this project (Forest Lakes
South) or to other items not normally included in CIP
reasonably related to this project (Forest Lakes
South) .
2. Upon the request of Albemarle County, Virginia, to
donate by gift to Albemarle county or its designee,
subject to items of record affecting title, for such
public use facilities as the County may select, a
parcel of approximately five (5) acres as shown on the
Application Plan for Forest Lakes South made by Clower
Associates, Inc., provided the owner may require
reasonable visual screening/buffering of the five (5)
acres.
3 .
.
.
Except for the five (5) acres described in Proffer 2
above, the development of the property will be limited
to those uses allowed by right under section 20.3.1 and
section 20.4.1(2) of the zoning Ordinance of Albemarle
County, virginia. Further, under Section 20.4.1(2) of
the Ordinance, the uses permitted by right under
section 23.0, Commercial Office (CO), will be limited
to section 23.2.1(1), (2), (3), (6), (7), (8), (9) and
(11). To be excluded from use by special use permit
under Section 20.3.2 of the Ordinance are sections
20.3.2(3) and (7). To be excluded from use by special
use permit under section 23.2.2 of the Ordinance are
Sections 23.2.2(1), (2), (4), (7) and (8).
4. In the event that at least 240 of the dwelling units
stated in Proffer 1 have not been built and a
certificate of occupancy issued within ten (10) years
from the date of the final approval of this zoning Map
Amendment, then the undersigned applicant agrees to
waive its rights under virginia Code Section
15.1-491(a1) .
5. No lot within the property will front on or have direct
access to any roads within the Hollymead PUD.
6.
Residential Areas 7 and 8 as shown on the Application
Plan for Forest Lakes South made by Clower Associates,
Inc., will be developed with single-family detached
dwelling units.
7. The owner agrees to provide recreational facilities in
accordance with Section 4.16 for multi-family areas
remote from the central recreational areas.
.
I ATTACHMENT 01
Ipage 31
Forest Lakes Associates
Page 2
January 17, 1992
8. The owner agrees to reconstruct and extend Powell Creek
Drive from Hollymead Drive to the Forest Lakes Spine
Road provided the necessary right-of-way exists or can
be obtained at no cost to Forest Lakes Associates.
We are sending you this notification in order to complete
our files. If you should have any questions or comments regarding
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
-W~~C'f
V(.,,() ?/
v. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning & Community Development
.
VWC/jcw
cc: Amelia Patterson
Jo Higgins
.
,--
'~" />r--
"-.... /
--
\
--
~
",
II:
, 1&1
U~I&I
::!:o~
~ i: ~
g~1&I
UlO - Cl
Ulll.~Qa:
<11:1&1<>
"a~O .
... ~a:...
......'01:0:1
~~~:I>
o -... UI
:iii"'!:!~
UI",~......
~~~~g
~~:o.::I~
::lll.~::J:
g'Ol:"'''U
~
.t""*
--:3
~
~
LL.
CO
('II
..J 0 II) ...
W,c 0 ~
0.= .,. - ~
ex: ~ . I ~
itLL.Q. ex: "Uf
CO";: "
t!l
"",cM C ~~~
Q.Q..O 0", ID g
J: c(GI~N o , , ,
I"'- 0"'''' 0
I- ::E~o ~I"'C\I
0
. ::> )(.,
M 0 ~
en en
< en
:E w
N ~
a: <(
0 -'
u. I- 0
Z en ct
< W +1
..J a: CD
D- O N
U.
,
,
0,1
>
-
W
o
w
a:
00
:'-I
::r::
":l-
~
<." 1/ '71~J3
',,,> :-".", qs, l1F/I/!?
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road f
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 I 0
(804) 296-5823 !
" n
JUN - ~ 1993
~oorno
-"'~'.".'1
Ul
I'
,
-.
J ne 9, 1993
. SOARD OF SUPP':"
/BSE Communications L.P.
d/b/a RAM Facilities Management
10 Woodbridge Center Drive
W odbridge, NJ 07095
SP-93-15 RAM/BSE Communications (applicant), Crown Orchard
Company (owner)
Sirs;
e Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
ne', 1993 unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted
tition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this
proval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Tower heights shall not exceed 300 feet;
2. Compliance with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3. There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a
federal agency. In the event that lighting is required,
only red lighting shall be used for nighttime obstruction
marking. Daylight tower lighting for obstruction purposes
is permitted. All tower lighting shall be shielded so as to
minimize visibility from the ground.
4. Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No
administrative approval shall constitute or imply support
for or approval of, the location of additional tower,
antennae, etc., even if they may be part of the same network
or system as any antennae administratively approved under
this section.
Communications L.P.
1993
P ease be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
w'll review this petition and receive public comment at their
meting on July 14, 1993. Any new or additional information
r garding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the
Bard of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled
h aring date.
W"lliam D. Fritz
S nior Planner
you should have any questions or comments regarding the above
ted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
~t~
Terry L. Wright
Crown Orchard Company
.
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
JUNE 8, 1993
JULY 14, 1993
SP-93-15 RAM/BSE COMMUNICATIONS (APPLICANT), CROWN ORCHARD
COMPANY (OWNER)
Petition: The applicant petitions the Board of Supervisors to
allow an approximately 300 foot tower [10.2.2.6]. The proposed
tower is to be located on Carter's Mountain. Property, described
as Tax Map 91, Parcel 28. This site is zoned RA, Rural Areas in
the Scottsville Magisterial District. This site is not located
in a designated growth area (Rural Area IV).
Character of the Area: This location is the top of Carter's
Mountain. The area is currently used is an orchard and a tower
farm. There are more than 10 towers currently on the site.
.
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has submitted a description
and justification for the request (Attachment C). The applicant
proposes to construct a guyed tower approximately 300 feet tall
and two equipment buildings to support the tower users. The
tower is to be designed to accommodate multiple users.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has reviewed this request for
compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning
Ordinance and recommends approval of SP-93-15.
Planning and Zoning History:
October 4, 1978 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-78-42
(Motorola), a request for a 200 foot communication tower.
January 18, 1980 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-79-76
(Jefferson Cable), a request for a five meter satellite receiving
dish.
March 19, 1980 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-80-02
(Shenandoah Valley TV), a request to remove an existing 230 foot
tower and replace it with a 186 foot television tower.
May 4, 1988 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-88-14 (Central
Virginia Educational TV), a request for 293 foot television
tower.
September 19, 1990 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-90-74
(Charlottesville Cellular), a request for a 150 foot cellular
telephone tower.
.
1
.
August 7, 1991 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-91-23
(Charlottesville Quality Cable) a request for a 200 foot wireless
cable transmission tower.
May 11, 1993 - The Planning Commission recommended approval of
SP-93-10 a request for a 60 foot reception tower for WVIR-TV.
Comprehensive Plan: A stated design standard of the
Comprehensive Plan is "design pUblic utility corridors to fit the
topography. Corridors should be shared by utilities, when
possible. Distribution lines should be placed underground". The
intent of this statement is to consolidate locations; therefore,
since the tower is located in an area with many other towers, the
application is consistent with this standard. The opportunity to
cluster towers is limited by topography. Staff has encouraged
consolidation of new towers in existing tower farms such as on
Carter's Mountain.
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the
provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 and will address each provision of
that section.
.
Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance
may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors
that such use will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property,
The nearest dwelling to the proposed tower site is located
approximately 2,500 feet distant. The nearest dwelling on
adjacent property is located approximately 3,400 feet distant.
The only adverse impact this tower will have on adjacent property
is visual. This tower is to be located just to the east of the
ridge line on Carter's Mountain. Due to its location off the
ridge line, the tower structure will be higher than most existing
towers, but will result in a tower elevation compatible with the
other towers in the area.
The equipment building that will accompany the towers will not be
visible from adjacent properties. The ridge line blocks the view
from the west and the mature forest blocks the view from the
east. The mountaintop is not visible from the north or south due
to topography and vegetation.
The applicant is proposing to utilize a strobe light to mark this
tower, if lighting is required by the FAA. (Lighting will likely
be required.) Historically, strobe lighting has not been
endorsed by the County. When a tower on Rio Road was redesigned,
strobe lighting was installed which resulted in numerous
.
2
.
.
.
complaints. The strobe was then shielded and complaints
subsided. Daytime obstruction marking may utilize contrasting
bands of white and aviation orange. Based on information
available to staff, strobe lighting is not required by the FAA as
adequate obstruction marking may be achieved by use of a red
beacon at night and contrasting bands during the day. (Strobe
lighting is permitted as a modification.)
Staff has contacted the State Aviation Administration in an
effort to determine if strobe lighting provides superior
obstruction marking. Based on comments from the SAA, strobe
lighting may be the more appropriate method of obstruction
marking when the tower is a stand alone facility. Due to the
proposed tower's location within a tower farm, strobe lighting
does not add to the overall safety of the obstruction marking.
Staff notes that the tower farm currently is located on
aeronautical charts. Based on the comments of the SAA, staff is
unable to state that strobe lighting provides for increased
safety. Staff does not support strobe lighting as it represents
the introduction of a different method of obstruction marking
which would cause this tower to stand out from other existing
towers.
that the character of the district will not be changed
thereby,
As stated previously, this site is the location of a tower farm.
Attachment D shows the locations of the proposed tower in
relation to existing towers. Due to the existing use of this
site, the character of the district will not be changed.
and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and
intent of this ordinance,
Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent of the ordinance as
stated in Sections 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 and is of the opinion that
this request is not in conflict with any provision of those
Sections.
with the uses permitted by right in the district,
The surrounding land is currently a fruit orchard and the orchard
use will remain. (Approximately 8 fruit trees will require
removal to permit the tower construction.) Based on the limited
impact caused by this tower to surrounding activity, this use
will not restrict permitted uses in the district.
3
.
with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this
ordinance,
Section 5.1.12 of the ordinance contains regulations governing
tower facilities and appropriate conditions are proposed to
ensure compliance with this provision of the ordinance.
and with the public health, safety and general welfare.
The provisions of increased communication facilities may be
considered consistent with the public health and safety by
providing for broadcasting/communication in emergencies.
Sununary
.
In recent reviews for towers on Carter's Mountain, staff was
informed by the various applicants that new towers were proposed
due to a lack of structural capacity or technical incompatibility
on towers which did have capacity. The proposed tower is
designed to accommodate multiple users. Because the tower owner
is constructing the tower solely for lease purposes and it is not
designed for a specific user (such as cellular telephone) the
tower will be made available to a wide variety of users. (The
tower owner will not utilize space on the tower for
transmission/reception.)
The primary issue which staff has identified during the review of
this request is the lighting of the tower. Contact with the SAA
indicates that safety is not improved by use of one marking
system instead of another. In order to maintain consistency with
the existing towers a red beacon at night may be the most
aesthetic approach. Staff has prepared a condition requiring any
nighttime lighting to be a red beacon.
Staff opinion is that this request is consistent with the
County's attempts to consolidate towers in existing tower farms
and provide excess capacity thereby reducing the total number of
towers required to satisfy the demands of the general public.
Based on the above comment and staff's analysis of Section
31.2.4.1, staff recommends approval of SP-93-15 subject to the
following conditions:
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Tower heights shall not exceed 300 feet;
2. Com~liance with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
.
4
.
3.
There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a
federal agency. In the event that lighting is required, red
lighting shall be used for nighttime obstruction marking.
No daylight tower lighting for obstruction purposes is
permitted unless required by a federal agency. All tower
lighting shall be shielded so as to minimize visibility from
the ground.
4. Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No
administrative approval shall constitute or imply support
for or approval of, the location of additional tower,
antennae, etc., even if they may be part of the same network
or system as any antennae administratively approved under
this section.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Applicant's Justification
D - Sketch Showing Location of Existing Towers and Proposed Tower
Including Approximate Heights
.
.
5
:::',aso,\'
~f
o
,
,
'- -
\1-"
!
,....J
,.
IATT:CHMENT AI
',,,,, !
~~
.
~.\our.T ':'1:.
.'i,,_..
.
~c"
;
,
/
(
'J
,
1
J, - =-- ~'"~
~" t)hd 1
\. - .
!~"::'" ~,-
r I@. ,', .. -;"'-
. :_' ~ ~'~'"~~,
' " ~ ,-
\ \ ~ . /
~'i:\, '\~\J~I ,,'"
r ,... "\' , r l'/
j \ - ~'. - - - - :... / "" n,,"n ,""
41";,"
~li;
,~
..'-, '~
. .'
'J
,oICr;~,tV
'04
P
/-}
"1 q)
,.;1:....--4.;-:.
'..;
:;.
.~
'-<t. ~
.... r" :640;
, "jJ~
I J
..
.;.' I
-~ f
....'784 "
I ..
~_1 I
"-., I
,';2:']: "".n ..
'.: )~~
V" ~
.~ , ~--'\
- '""""'...
\ -
I;
, [@
",
,
\
~
<to
"
~.i:'
0'"
'"
~
"'~~'....
I
I
,
I
~/,"
~\
\
J
I
,-
,
I
,
\
'\
\
\.//
[ill, '-*v
~-; ,
/
..>..
,,\
, ?'1
"::~~/ '~~ ~ / ",
/ I (_n.
,-~I ~ " f""lTil
/;- I
" ,
'"
~
~
~:'-~
v
~
.....
,
;I~~"
o
,'<"
,,.
J
"''-';\
c.,
(",.t.
~
>'/620
~""
I
'i"
.
ALBEMARLl
77 _
...
I ATTACHMENT 81. =
... ,r-~
'-..-.
21
..
'I
\
'J<.\..-
'\
'\
+
-1 -l....+-
" ,../
-......-
'",
... '- '---~
'- ""'" X ""- '\ '\
" ~) l \,
\" l' I Ii "
~ " (f .n \.
\ "'" "\
'\ \\, \ -\ 1-
\ \ \/ X,> ~~ \ \
'" \. '--...:..-- ------ '-- \
~ "--- ~
'\ ". ~~ - 'v
1 /
SP-93-1S ,
RAM/BSE Corrmunicat1.ons
I
i
t
27
. 90 .
.
( ." /
'\ ----') ). X
" -r (
\. (I )
\ '{
103
SCOTTSVILLE DISTRICT
SECTION 91
[ATTACHMENT C
.
- ---
:=:::= .== ::::: ==
=-=-= =ea==
- -----
=-----== ,\
:= - -=-==
2400 Ownby Lane
Richmond, VA 23220
804-353-4782
804-353-8059 (FAX)
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
May 17, 1993
Mr. William D. Fritz
Senior Planner
Couty of Albemarle
Department of Planning and
Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, V A 22902-4596
RECEIVED
MAY 1 9 1993
Planning Dept.
RE: SP-93-15 RAM/BSE Communications Ltd. Partnership
Dear Mr. Fritz:
The following information is provided as requested in your letter of May 7, 1993. Where
possible, I have followed the outline of your letter for consistency.
.
1.
Attached is a copy of Mr. Henry Chiles' letter of authorization to sigh the Special Use
Permit Application. Mr. Chiles faxed this letter directly to you.
2. The proposed tower is intended to be a heavy duty triangular guyed tower supporting a
top mounted FM Radio antenna. I have included a copy of a structural engineer's
report depicting the proposed tower. The tower is intended to be an overall height of
300', including the FM Radio antenna and a face (width of each side) of
approximately 4 feet. We propose the tower to be a neutral galvanized color,
acceptable to the Planning Department.
Our application mentioned that this tower is intended to be a shared communications
site available on a rental basis to other communications tenants who are technically
compatible with other users. In anticipation of offering this site to other users, RAM
has had the tower designed to accommodate up to fifty-four(54) antennas. These
antennas will be small two-way whip type antennas similar to the antennas presently
mounted on the towers on Carter's Mountain.
.
Regarding lighting of the tower, RAM would desire to obstruction mark the tower in
accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations regarding
communications towers. We have proposed to accomplish this through the use of
medium intensity strobe lights, acceptable to the Planning Department. Strobe lighting
has been found to provide safer lighting for communications towers over the older red
obstruction lighting and contrasting bands of aviation orange and white paint bands.
The strobe lights direct the light upward improving visibility for air traffic and
minimizing the amount of light seen from street level. At night the strobe lights
IATTACHMENT Cllpage 2
.
Mr. William D. Fritz
County of Albemarle
May 18, 1993
Page 2
change to a low power soft blinking white light. Again, this light is reflected upward
for the safety of air traffic and minimizes the amount of white light seen at street
level. As an added benefit, the use of strobe lighting eliminates the FAA requirement
of painting the tower the contrasting bands of aviation orange and white which tends to
make the tower less obtrusive looking.
As an alternative, a combination lighting system consisting of medium intensity strobe
lights during the day changing over to red obstruction lights during the night can be
used. This system is more expensive but would be acceptable to us.
.
4. RAM proposes to install two prefabricated electronic equipment shelters. The
proposed shelters will measure approximately 11' wide by 18' to 20' long and 10'
high. Each shelter will have a painted (white) aluminum exterior. The two buildings
will be situated close to the tower's base within a 50' X 50' area. An emergency back-
up generator enclosed in a weather proof enclosure will be mounted on a cementpad
measuring approximately 4' X 6'.
I appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this additional information. If you have
additional questions or I have not sufficiently explained are area, please don't hesitate to
contact me at 800/438-3810.
Sincerely,
~'W--
Terry L.~ght
General Manager
Attachments
.
;"17
~
IATTACHMENT cll Page ~
PAUL J. FORO AND COMPANY
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
350 Eosl Brood Slreel Sulle 500 Columbus, Ohio 43215
(614)-221-6679 FAX (614)-221-2540
1 or 2
KJS Dale 4-19-1993
1915093
P.O. 8 X 8597 FORT WORTH, TX 76124-0597
. (817) 4 7-.3060 FAX (817) 429-6010
Tower 270 FT GUYED
Location CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
Owner RAM FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
Design 80 MPH + SIMULTANEOUS 1/2" ICE
According to ANSI/EIA 222-E 1991
Page
By
.Job No.
Revision No.
Dote
Vi
.~
8 3/4"~ 0.0,
PIPE
ANTENNA LIST
NO IL. ANTENNA COAX
1 297' -270' ERI 4AE/SP W/RAD 1 5/8"~
2 265' ERI 2AE/SP 1 5/8"~
3,4 260' ~2)PDl 0017 (2)-1 1/4"~
260" 2)6' SIDEARMS -
5-16 240' (12)PD10017 (12)-1 1/4"1lS
240' 1 0' PLA TFORM
17 220' ERI 2AE/SP 1 5/8"~
18,19 210' (2)PD 10017 (2)- I 1/4"0
210' (2)6' SIDEARMS -
20 200' ERI LP-IAR W/RAD 1 5/8"~
21-32 180' (12)PD10017 (12)-1 1/4"0
180' 10' PLA TFORM -
3.3-35 160' tlPD1D017 (3)-7/8"0
160' 3)6' SIDEARMS -
36-38 160' 3)PD10017 (3)-7 /8"~
140' (6)6' SIDEARMS -
39-41 120' (3)PD10017 (3)-7 /8"~
120' 6' SIDEARM
42,43 80' ~2~6'0 GRID ~2)-1/2"0
44,45 60' 2 6'1lS GRID ~-1/2"~
46 50' 6'0 GRID 1 2"1lS
47-54 50'-0' (8)YAGIS (8)-1/2"0
50'-0' (8)6' SIDEARMS
- INSIDE CLIMBING LADDER
- ICE SHIELDS @ 270', 230', 210', 100', AND 50'
- COAX ASSUMED EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED TO THREE
TOWER FACES
AZ
NE
NW
S
GUY RADIUS
RADIUS ELEV
214' +3'
230' -18'
..226' -13'
...
A~ 4'-0"%
297'
'$
t
N
224'
270'
--
% <( 260'
lRn'
.
\ ,/ I :, Ii
.- 1/:'---;:>- / .....'-..
~/---~Z~~ l>9b -- - - --,,-, "- ~
./ - - - - - -7 - - - - ~-""" TOWER
,./" ....--::._- ------ ~ - ~ " " '--'"
)/ - --- 14~-,..Q.u.Y__ ~ ""': 1.196 ~U~"" r.
/- - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - -- ----: - - - ~''''... \ MOTOROLA 222 Ft
~ - TO~R Iv \
:2': :--'-- :'0; i CHARLOTTESVILLE CELLULAR 150 Ft _, "\ ' <\ \. \
~ ---.::-~------------" 140' .---------------<ir~"\,, "'" '., \ ~ \. t \. \ :
/7===-----~~=+=-=,:---==----=----=-, --- '- "~I ""f, ~........ : : \ '
"" \ \ ":?'I'" ... .. I \ \ \: I
t. 'v - j--- 1416 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ' ",,'" ~>\ \ "'\ \.. \. .. ....... \. \ ... \. \ \ \ \
.~ .___i-7-=-~ ~~22-:-~~-:_' "'0 .\,.' '\ \ ~ \ I ...... \...~R~H~~,o", I ... \ \ ': !
7..nJl-- ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , 24 - - - " , :::-V'ONC l>-tlO \ "'p , .l> \ \ \ \ \ \ " /
"'ov .' ------__ .-, -__,0" ", ~ '.', \1 \l. I .. ;;. ~ I I " " "
" ,,~q,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 142 - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - ... _ _ : ,'" ". ~d' a., \ ' \ \ \ \'\~ ~ <g. ~ " ,/ ,/ ,/
... 8 ,,' "", \ \ \ / /
~.----=I~ ' O\R.~S\ \ \, \ \ ! ~ f ~ J!! ;',.:
~ \ \ \ \ \ ) I.,. I' ex) / 1/ /
- - \ 4~2. - - - - - - - - - - - _ VE \ \ \ '\ I I 01 ': ~ I " I / / /
~ -' - - ~ -+\ \ \ \' \ I I I ,., I I I I / /
/"~- -...- '~fNog~.~~ ---, - d \M~G~E,~ C\ ~O~!HI ~ ! !:,' In / " "
/ ,'~ _J1H~'4a5c~ ooPC<l;GO: ~ ~ I ~ i ! i ! I \; :' I I'
' , ,~ '" " I 'T I , I ,'I ~ ~ ,
/' /' ~~- ~ :j[ WE:R Iii i g :! I g I ~
" " " ~x ,SO'C" I' : 3o~'i ~
~~ >s---! ~~~-~'\, / ,rr... if :<:'j,.:,: I "~
'./ -,.'-- . - , / , -:: : .f ,"/j;}'//, ,':! , )
/' ,,' 0 ,',',' , " / / ...... " I ~.' I I' I I ,','
1>.0 , , ' ;;: , ' ,', ,I,' I" , I I I,
\1>. I ", .... , ' " "/ '3)"'j / ")'b<O / / ,'," '/ ' I "
./ ,," "', I,' " , ' " ',', ") ,..... boo I , ,', ' I ,
;' " ,,", I " , , ' , '/ I ....... I q, I I I I I ,'I I I
" " '/ " I , , " ',' I, I I ") "'I' I I I I,' I I
"" I I , " I' , ' " , Il';{ I I ......^)<b I I I 10 I I I I
"" ,/ J / ,/ /' ~,-' ,,' ,,' ,,' ,'1'. D-t,'H<~~';>,' /1/,','1/1..... I 1,,',/,,' $/1,/ /11/'
I , I ...., , ' , 1 ~~ ,., I I I I 'b I , III I I I
{""rv ,', _ "I", ~)'I 11"....../' I,ll ,
" / ',' rv / ' , , 'N ' '~o .....", 'I I, ~) A<O A'f1. I , I I I I
" , I' "" ,',' I I ' 0 ~ I I I I 'I I I ., ., I I I '! '
" ,/ I,' ,',...." ,,I /' '" ./ I' , " I I ' I ' I ") ~, I I I' I I' I
' " , /' ,',' , ,...., I I I' I, I III ,.... ~ I I
.l>, I '" " , " I I , I' I I I I I I........ I,' I I I I
.Ii> I "" / " , 0'" I I I I I I '1. I I I( I ~. I I 7
" " " /, ~, ,',,' '/ ::: ' , /' I I I / / I " II ,',' / I <o'b,' ,'111 ~ /0,' ,
I / , I I' "" I ,', I I I I I , I I I I I I j' ") I I I :? I I "
I , .... , , / ' " I" I I I I .... , I....
I / ~ I I , , " , I' , I I II , I I I I I I. I ! I I '<
I /0/ / , " " "1 I" I I I II ' I I I I <0 I I , I
I I~, I ," / ' , ,:.." , <0 'I I I ,I 1 I I I I I I I I ")<0 I I I I
I I , ',' "" / ' (j , , I I I I I! I I I I .... 'f1. I I ~_
I. / , / :(} " ,,"".... , 'f1. I I , I 'b, I I I I I ! I I <O.:l I' -,
I / / / / ' 'f1. " 1 / ;;:, I.... I' " 0,<0 I II ~'b I " I / I I,' " I :::> / II
I , ,'...." ...." / I' I ") , , I , I I.... I I
I I I "'/ 'b <0 I" ..... I' I' I, I I I' I, I I I I
" ,/,',' " ,',' .i' .i' ,,' ,,'/ " /1,,' " I ' ',,' " ~/ " $ 1/ ,,'/,,' ,,' ,,' ,'/1 I,',' I, /','
, "I:(!' " I", '," ".'.... '...."'" '" I I' r
/ , , \;/'", "" , I " ., I' ',In rv "" "
, I' ....,"/, I " I, I I " I I,,...., ::; "" ,'" ,....,
/ , ", I '", / ' , I , /, "" I ',.... ...../ / "/'" :: ,: ::
' /""" 1'1' , " "<1)1.1 I "11//,
I /'/ ' , " '", , I' " ,/,...., / 0 ' / " /' /, I / / ~
' ", '", '1'1 '.....1<1)',1 / . ,1/
r " ,t',' ,', , , / ' , " '", 0 In' ,,....,, I , I , I / / I I II /
' , I ",' '" '/' I 0 "J I , , ..... , I '/ In / / / I , ,
" , / I ", l\t '", ,,',,,, 6" ~:::! , , , / ' , ,":- I 1/ , / ,
, " '/ ' , ':i:' '", "0 'f1. I " ", I .....' <c v- / I r , /
/ ", , , ..../ ' , " ','f1...../' I " I' , ...... "- / / / I ,
/ , rv , " I", ".... I I I /, ,,1 I , "'l ,...., / / ' I
/ ~ ' ;! " 1",/"" "1 I ", 1/ I ..... ..... rv I "
/ !;1- , ..... , , " /,' I " , ' I I '" "'j "
, .... , , , " ," ',,' ,'/ ' I " , I I::! In', <.
, I' f!?",/" , , " "/ VJ , , .....
'1/""", ',I' ""0'/" ::!j'
, .....", '," ,"'QJI,// /,
, , I, ,'I,',' ", I :::! / / I '/,' ,
, , ,,' / I' /,' I / I / I , <0
' I'" 1"1/'", VJ
I ' 'I , ,....,+
I , I, It) , / I / " ,.....
, I, '0", I I " I,
I I/:::!' / I / / /'/ I
/ I, , I I' ,
, I I I I I , " ,
/ I / / /, / I I
I / '" I /2 '
, "",...., ~
:' //,/ij
-\-
'J..../~
~
~
&~ -\-
::T./~
~
9-
~+
/
c
.-
Z
w
:E
:I
U
~
~
...
~~
,<:-0
· <::J <<
...
./
'\
";
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
/
I
/
I
,
,
,
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
\
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
1
I
I
I
/
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
/
,
,
/
I
r
I
I
/
I
/
/
/
,
,
,
,
,
, I
:1
I
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
In
'<t'
'<t'
T OWE R ' J. . '.' .
~ ' '-ADELPHIA CABL~' 142 F~ \
-- ~ --.-----.---.-,
.~~ .. ~ J .
.m:~:..~:l<.i..
~1;;"
.~1~~:}~:::.~,' .
~',....,.'t.."
11J~A\
"~:'." -
~- .. l.
"h
...l
"~:,,:'
l',"
:.. ~t~
'.ii.'
.~.
"
50 0
EEH:HfHE
GRAPHIC SCALE
50
I
FEET
100
J
150
I
, ,
..
Distributed tn Board: (J!J:..ffi -~
AgeAd. Item 1-4J, CliiCJfl+, @ifr
il?
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
""L 'Ol' I tdTV Ot:" "L".~
-' _11'1 f; ,,'i~ f-\;:",,\':~'Ln,'~'-A~rvl k.
rmr~ 8__~:: :-:rL[/l~~ r~~1l
! ill - - - '" ; 1(
'U' ',,'
I::. (~ MAR 17 F'93 \ '. j
j P \ " t
j:1 i .I I '
I: \ \ 1'-l'r-';- i-r-r-/ II
L. u c.:~ ~-.L!'"} L1 l L, ( "
-. L....,_.. l,,______
80/\t~[) OF SiJf1C R\./tS()f{S
Ma ch 17, 1993
Th mas-Cato, Inc
AT N: Patricia Thomas-Cato
T/ The Billard Center
38 Greenbrier Drive, Suite E
Ch rlottesville, VA 22901
RE: SP-93-06 Thomas-Cato, Inc
Tax Map 61W, Section 1, Block A, Parcel 5
De Ms. Thomas-Cato:
Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March
1993, by a vote of 4-2-1, recommended approval of the above-
ed request to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors. Please
e that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Use shall be limited to 380 Greenbrier Drive;
2. No ~lcoholic bever~geD Dh~ll be permitted The sale of alcohol
shall require reaoproval two years after the date of Board of
Supervisors approval of this permit;
3. Hours of operation shall be limited to:
Monday - Thursday
Friday - Saturday
Sunday
10:00 a.m. to 12 midnight
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.
12 noon to 10:00 p.m.
4. Cooperative parking is permitted pursuant to Section 4.12.4.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
will review this petition and receive public comment at their
mee ing on April 14, 1993. Any new or additional information
reg rding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the
Boa d of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled
hea ing date.
. ,
t
, Tt omas-Cato, Inc
Page 2
March 17, 1993
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above-
no~ed action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Si~cerely,
~r / // /,~/'~
",-V CL~fl"-~ Y /_> ~
Wi~liam D. Fritz
Senior Planner
WDF/jcw
cc: \.,'-f~ila Carey
Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
Greenbrier Square Limited Partnership
, ,
'-'.
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
MARCH 16, 1993
APRIL 14, 1993
-93-06 THO
-CATO IBC.
Request to amend SP-91-43 to allow food and alcohol
les at a billiard center [24.2.2(1)]. Property described as
x Map 61W, section 1, Block A, Parcel 5, is located on the
rth side of Greenbrier Drive just west of Route 29 in the
C arlottesville Magisterial District. This site is zoned HC,
H'ghway Commercial [Proffered] and is located in a designated
g owth area (Neighborhood 1) and is recommended for Community
S rvice.
This property is the location of
G eenbrier Square. Adjacent uses in Greenbrier Square include
p'zza delivery, a dance school and a laundromat. Uses in the
r ar building include warehousing, contractor's offices,
w olesale distribution and an emergency veterinary clinic.
lie tiS P 0 os&l: The applicant seeks to amend condition 2
SP-91-43 to permit the sale of alcohol. The applicant
rrently operates a billiard center, which will remain. A snack
r was proposed during the review of SP-91-43 but has not been
tablished.
.
.
nuary 13, 1984 - Planning Commission approved Pargo's
staurant and Office Condominium site plan.
bruary 14, 1985 - Planning Commission recommended denial of
-84-32 stating that scope and possibilities of uses was too
oad.
bruary 20, 1985 - Board of Supervisors approved ZMA-84-32.
is action rezoned the property from C-1 to HC with proffers.
1985 - Planning Commission approved Greenbrier Park site
ly 30, 1985 - Planning Commission recommended approval of ZMA-
-18 which amended the previous rezoning to allow motels and
proves Super 8 Motel site plan.
1
...
ust 7, 1985 - Board of Supervisors approved ZMA-85-18. This
ed hotels, motels, and inns as an allowed use for a portion of
site (Proffered).
ch 21, 1990 - Board of Supervisors approved ZMA-90-01 which
ed Fast Foods Restaurant to the list of allowed uses
offered) .
ember 7, 1990 - Board of Supervisors approved ZMA-90-15 which
itted churches (proffered).
ember 20, 1991 - The Board of Supervisors approved ZMA-91-06, a
uest to rezone the property to C-1, Commercial (Proffered) and
Highway Commercial (Proffered).
ember 20, 1991 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-91-43, a
est to establish a billiard center.
FF COMMENT:
special use permit for the billiard center was approved by the
rd of Supervisors with a condition stating "No alcoholic
erages shall be permitted". The staff report for SP-91-43
tained a statement addressing alcohol sales, "In an effort to
uce any potential negative factors that a use of this type could
erate, the applicant has stated that alcohol will not be
ved."
ff's analysis is divided into two areas: Land Use and Public
fare.
Zoning Department has reviewed the available parking on-site
tachment B). Parking on-site is not adequate if calculated on
er use basis. However, due to the nature of the activities on-
e, particularly the church, adequate parking is available if
perative parking is authorized (reference Section 4.12.4).
ff recommends the use of cooperative parking based on the
culations and comments provided by the Zoning Department.
Th's activity has no impact on residential property as the nearest
idential lot is located to the west approximately 800 feet
tanto The nearest school is Albemarle High School on Hydraulic
d, approximately 3/4 mile distant. The immediate area is
rently a mixture of commercial activities some of which have ABC
enses. (The laundromat, SUDS, located in the same building as
billiard center had an ABC license, but has not renewed the
ense) .
ff opinion is that the proposed use is consistent with the
rby land uses.
2
,I.
ublic Welfare:
n review of this request, staff contacted the Police Department.
aIls for service at this site attributable to the billiard center
ccurred in December, 1992 between the 16th and 21st. These calls
ere for disorder, assault (both on December 16), harassment
December 20) and fraud (December 21, this call is reported as
nfounded). There have been no other calls for service identified
y the Police Department. The Police Department has commented on
he proposed request raising issues and concern. The comments of
he Police Department are included as Attachment C. Staff notes
hat alcohol sales must be licensed by the Alcohol Beverage Control
oard (ABC). Staff notes that no substantial investment is
'nvolved in the proposed alcohol sales. Staff recommends that if
his request is approved that it be approved for two (2) years to
llow for an operational review period.
approval and monitoring will occur for this use as it does for
use with a license to sell alcohol.
taff is unable to qualify the comments of the Police Department.
ssues of public welfare are a matter of legislative discretion.
hould the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors choose to
pprove this petition, staff offers the following recommended
onditions of approval:
ECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL These conditions are identical
o those for SP-91-43 exce t as noted :
Use shall be limited to 380 Greenbrier Drive;
2. No ~lcoholic bever~geo oh~ll be permitted The sale of alcohol
shall require reapproval two years after the date of Board of
Supervisors approval of this permit;
3. Hours of operation shall be limited to:
Monday - Thursday
Friday - Saturday
Sunday
10:00 a.m. to 12 midnight
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.
12 noon to 10:00 p.m.
4. Cooperative parkinq is permitted pursuant to Section 4.12.4.
----------------
TTACHMENTS:
- Tax Map
B - Parking Calculations
C - Police Department Comment
" .
ALBEMARLE
COL.,~ TY
4
,
10
'12
II.
I'
..
III
SP-93-06
Th:Jmas-cato, Ine.
14
19
~
c
w
.
:
z
z
o
o
...
"'
Of
...
KALI .. 'lET
... -
CHARLOTTESVILLE
\ ATTACHMENT A \
.
N
DISTRICT
==--- -
I
.
I,
,Go
18
,.,
CD
!!!
~
";:
.
~
o
~
o
z:
U
LimOlta
Line
SECTION 61-W
. .
I ATTACHMENT B I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
::~:_'t ~,..... .' '(, '::.cnr '"' ~~ II ---- ,~
;~~,--:: :;1"'" S;7>tM1 ~ lJiIl, Q~:t 'ie
d. '... ~.,:.;:..j ~~I' ~-~ 1: tJ1J ~!f1B ~
:. ;:-;:.1, ~) LI. JooJ'"
, ~'''- . 7./
i;,,":: .' '.-_',. ~ , .,-. '~l "
~ ~'1 i'~t~~
"-'
r'~{~"....-:
;: jJ ~ ~ 11.-
......... (w.lr....':. "'...
MEMORANDUM
~
0:
William D. Fritz, Senior Planner ,~~~
Amelia G. McCulley, Zoning Administrator~~
ATE:
E:
February 24, 1993
SP-93-06 - The Billiards Center
Parking at Greenbriar Shopping Center
he dining area and kitchen proposed for the Billiards Center
ill require eight new parking spaces. The~e are no parking
paces available on site for this proposal, unless the Commission
llows a cooperative parking arrangement in accordance with
.12.4, which states
Parking space required under the provisions of this
ordinance may be provided cooperatively for two or more uses
in a development or for two or more individual uses, subject
to arrangements that will assure the permanent availability
of such space as such arrangements are approved by the
commission.
The amount of such combined space shall be equal to the sum
of the amounts required for the separate uses; provided,
that the commission may reduce the amount of space required
for a church or for a meeting place of a civic, fraternal or
similar organization or other uses under the provisions of a
combined parking area by reason of different hours of normal
activity than those of other uses participating in the
combinations.
church occupying part of this shopping center accounts for ten
arking spaces. It is my understanding that the church's lease
imits them to using the building on Wednesday evenings and
unday mornings. There are also two offices that are open from
:00 to 5:00. Eleven spaces are required for these offices.
In other words, there are 21 spaces that may be available to the
illiards center during its peak evening and weekend hours when
he offices and church are closed. Of course, the billiards
. .
.
I ATTACHMENT B" Page 2
j:)age 2
~ebruary 24, 1993
~enter is also open during the day, so not all of these spaces
~ould be used cooperatively during the daytime.
would also like to point out that there is still space to be
eased in this shopping center, at least 6100 square feet.
~efore we can issue zoning clearances for these uses, it is
ikely that the applicant will need further approval from the
~ommission for cooperative parking, or a variance from the Board
pf Zoning Appeals.
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
IATTACHMENT cl
:;;..A O'f AL/J~~
~'. '~r' .' ;?,\
<..J .. t'l,
... . . ~
", 1-'
I "RGIl"\1'-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
~i(""'~~. E"" "'E-
.l.,,, u. I1iV" il.
" ~" 9.., ~
" "'...... ...,j/ Ii....
Bill Fritz
Department~U
:"'Q 1 6 t......3
I i:D "}"')
Lee Catlin, Police
February 12, 1992
""'.,
;~~'T! q : rv"~ D. eno1.
~ L._.. 04 " .~ i......~.
Alcohol Sales at the Billiard Center
After discussing this issue with our patrol lieutenants, I
flanted to express the fOllowing issues/concerns we have about
permitting alcohol sales at this location:
- the business stays open later than other establishments in
the Route 29 area and attracts a large late-night crowd.
- the business by its nature attracts large amounts of young
people under the age of 21.
- there are already a number of establishments in that area
where alcohol is available.
- the parking lot between Barnabys and the 7-11 immediately
across the street attracts large numbers of juveniles in the
summer resulting in a significant number of disorder calls
in the area.
- the traffic flow in that area has increased substantially,
and the nearby intersection of 29 North and Greenbrier Drive
is one of the highest accident rate locations in the entire
county.
- is food readily available during all hours of operation?
We would be happy to discuss this information further at your
ctoonvenience. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment on
his issue.
e
."
..
There are several points related to our application which I would like
dress in more detail.
The Billiard Center has been a "good citizen" of Albemarle County. We
many regular customers and are frequented by men, women, and families.
ve successfully established a wholesome atmosphere and will continue to
the necessary effort to maintain this atmosphere.
In the last year we have hosted school field trips, soccer parties, birth-
arties, a Chamber of Commerce Social, and even a baby shower. We expect
ntinue to be the kind of place where these activities can continue.
We obtained all activity reparts from the County Police. There have been
incident reports in thirteen months. Oddly, all four occurred in the
of December. Even though I believe four incident reports over a 13 month
d is not alarming, I would like to briefly discuss each one. The first two,
date 12/16/92, stem from what was essentially a domestic dispute which
carr'ed over to our place of business. This argument could have broken out
anyw ere, even in the middle of a department store. The reason there are two
repo ts is that one of the persons involved reported the incident and we
repo ted it also.
repo
neve
The third incident, dated 12/20/92, we were unaware of until seeing the
t. The complainant was the mother of a former employee. The employee
mentioned any incident to us.
The fourth incident involved an attempt by a "con" artist to talk an
yee into loaning him $55.00 due to the con and his alleged family being
edly stranded on the road. This incident was reported by the manager of
illiard Center.
are
the
adhe
The Billiard Center realizes the serious nature of its request to serve
and beer. With the privilege to do so comes a great responsibility. We
ware of the rules and regulations we must follow in order to comply with
tate laws governing such activity. I assure you, they will be strictly
ed to. Not only that, but we realize there can be certain "gray" areas
iated with the serving of beer. Whether or not someone of legal age has
00 much to drink is a situation we know we must be prepared to address.
no accident that we have had no problems in the past year. The reason
e are constantly aware of what is going on in our place of business.
h it has rarely been necessary, we have asked people to leave because
behavior was not in keeping with our standards. This is good for business
se all the others customers appreciate it. Our vigilance will continue
ur tradition of good, clean fun will continue, too.
is,
Thou
thei
beca
and
,"
-
Having seen a copy of the memorandum from Lee Catlin of the Police
Dep~rtment to Bill Fritz of the Planning Commission, I would like to address
eacn of the points raised in this memorandum.
Point 1: Our business is open later than most in the area and attracts
a l~rge late night crowd.
Reply: The businesses closest to ours and their hours relative to ours are:
Bar~aby's Restaurant - We close 1/2 hour earlier on Sundays, 1 1/2 hours later
on ~ondays through thursdays, and 2 1/2 hours later on Fridays and Saturdays.
7-1 Store - Open 24 hours per day, every day.
Gre~nbrier Theatre - We close earlier on Sundays, about 1/2 later Mondays through
Thu sdays, and 2 1/2 hours later on Fridays and Saturdays.
Piz a Hut - We close 2 hours earlier on Sundays, at the same time Mondays through
Thu sdays, and 1 hour later on Fridays and Saturdays.
As 0 the large late night crowd, our business rarely has more than twenty
cus omers at anyone time, even on Friday and Saturday nights. We only average
abo t 50 customers per day - total.
Point 2: The business, by it nature, attracts large amounts of young
peo le under the age of 21.
Reply: First of all, we do not attract disproportionate numbers of
peo le of any age group. Clearly the assumption about the perceived "nature"
of cur business is just that - an assumption. First hand observation would
con irm that while our business does have, and hopes to continue to have,
cliEntel under age 21, the vast majority of our clientel are over 21. The most
recEnt study by the Billiard Institute of America indicates the following
par icipation by age:
Under 18: 8.0 MILLION PARTICIPANTS
18 - 34 20.7""
35 - 54 8.7""
55 and over 1 . 8 " "
Unfcrtunately, the study did not separate the under 21 and over 21 age group,
but our experience is that the 25 - 40 year old segment is most active.
Undcubtedly a large number of the under 18 year old participants include
chiJdren accompanied by adults (their parents).
The study also indicates that the fastest rising segment of participants
is in the 35 - 54 age range, which increased 22.2% between 1987 and 1991.
Point 3: There are already a number of establishments in the area where
alco~ol is available.
Reply: We believe that our establishment will offer a unique blend of
family atmosphere, entertainment, food and refreshment. We are attempting
to r~spond to a demand based on our year's experience and our conversations
with many, many customers.
Point 4: The parking lot between Barnaby's and 7-11 has been the site of
a si~nificant number of disorder calls in the area.
Reply: I do not believe that this situation reflects in any way on our
exis ing business nor do I see any reason to believe that the changes we hope
to m~ke will impact this situation at all.
." '
III
'.
Point 5: Traffic flow is substantial and the 29 North/Greenbrier Drive
rsection has a relatively high accident rate.
Reply: First of all, our business, as has been indicated before, is not
rticularly high traffic business. Secondly, our business's peak traffic is
een 8 p.m. and 11 p.m., which is counter to the peak traffic flow in the
are. Thirdly, we are already in operation and whatever incremental effect we
hav on the area is already felt. We do not foresee more than a slight increase
in raffic due to the changes we are proposing. We feel that the changes will
enh nce our business by encouraging our existing clientel to lengthen the amount
of ime they are in our place of business. Many now leave after a brief time
to 0 to another establishment which offers food, or food and beer. Also, there
wil be the additional revenue from the sales of food and beer to our existing
cus omers. Therefore, while the changes are expected to increase revenue, it is
not necessarily true that traffic will be increased.
Point 6: (Question) Will food be readily available during all hours of
ope ation?
Reply: Food will be readily available during all hours of operation.
Our concept for The Billiard Center has been successfully implemented
thr ughout the country. There are several respectible food/bar and billiard
est blishments operating in Richmond, VA and throughout the state.
By instituting a new concept in entertainment and social gathering, we
hop to make Charlottesville/Albemarle a better place to live and work. Only
by oing so could we expect to be successful in our endeavor.
In closing, I would like to thank you for considering our application.
We, the owners, feel close to the Albemarle County/Charlottesville area.
THE BILLIARD CENTER
380 GREENBRIER DRIVE
rn
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
22901
ill
July 8,
JJL 12.
,I
BOARD OF ~~VISORS
1993
Mr. David P. Bowerman
401 McIntire Road
Cha lottesville, VA 22902-4596
Mr. Bowerman,
With the vote concerning the special use permit for our business
co ing up on July 14th, my wife and I wanted to repeat our thanks to you
fo your support. As we mentioned, 'this issue is a "make it or break it"
is ue for us. Our ability to continue to be in business is at stake.
We are committed to evolving our business along the same lines we have been
fo lowing - i.e. a first class, up-scale facility with an overall atmosphere
of fun and respectability.
If you have any questions about our request or business, please do
no hesitate to call us.
Sincerely,___ ('.1
A,C\fl\k('3 ,~ v- I ~
VfrJ:~- /, ~
James R. Cato
Patricia T. Cato
THE BILLIARD CENTER
Work - (804)973-2883
(703) 368-3171
Home - (804)979-0577
(703) 369-0996
JR /ct
cc file
7/~!
,./(/3
q~lY/Fl; 113
Edward H. Ba n, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte y, umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
June 18, 1993
T THE PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESSED:
This is to provide notice to you, as an adjacent property owner, that the
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on June 2, 1993, suspended
i s Rules of Procedure and voted to reconsider SP-93-06 for Thomas Cato, Inc.,
a described below:
SP-93-06. Thomas Cato, Inc. (applicant); Greenbrier Square Limited
Partnership (owner). To amend SP-91-43 to allow food and alcohol
sales at a billiard center. Property in Greenbrier Square which is
on the North side of Greenbrier Drive, West of Route 29 N, is zoned
HC. TM61W,PS,Sec 1,Blk A. Charlottesville District.
The meeting will be held on July 14, 1993, 7:00 P.M., in Meeting Room #7,
S cond Floor, County Office Building. If you should have any questions, please
d not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
,
~- ", ! ((i
/ l~ L C. .' Li I u I
{ia w. carey~ 6ie~k
E C:mrns
c Chicken Chalet Rotisserie Incorp.
Richard S. Freedman
Christopher R. or Kathleen Covert
Harold P. Harrison
MOA Portfolio I. Ltd.
Flowers Baking Co. of Lynchburg, Inc.
Paul A. or Joan B. Roth
Southland Corp.
Barnaby's Inc.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
Bill Fritz
(1)
Printed on recycled paper
."
llJ
'-
;~/:
~
0-
'-
r.~
-'-
C.i
rr
r-J \'
\;
(i~
o
>-
<I
U
I
W
<I
l:;
o
:J:
>-
,r-
~
-0
<;>
!<J
0-
(L
W
z
o
\.
f
1
ri;
l
-:;, v-.::.::-::..__....
-(
r
~
"-
~
I
~
~
I
L:;
L'
,-
f-
~
E
,!O
D
r--;
f-
U
l-LJ
Cl:::c: c::: 0:::
r .:r <I :I C .:I
. (Lu...",
,XX
-:I :r <I: <!:
t- i-J-
'1 t'1 'T
0.. 0
~ .- ..... ..... ~-
"-
""
o
u
z
o
W
H
a:
o
w
Ul
W
H
>- <J:
o >
oc
W
01- ...J
<I Li.l !.l~' ,
...:. -1 . '~
O'"1:A>
o I.J..(J)
<:: ~ a::: w
o !-
,,- Z .o:f" i-
o 00
~~<rc2
_IHX<I
-.oIOI
OU;I.lU
,
LJ
..:.[ tf'l
u.. ("oJ t"<) ltl W
......... (J) to l) (.0 A
i1- (0 (r) J) iJ) 0
....r WW lllU
:r: o:::o:::-,..n:
X Q Q c;''-L
'J:. OQQ '::-..:<'--\
i-<I<!:<J;:rc:r:N
: ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~
""
o
..
o
f)
"-
""
o
u
Z
H
W
H
no
W
u;
lO
H
I-- <J:
1:J ::...
cr
Ul
'~ i
.j W J..
H ,.
,,""
"D
o
W
01--
~liJ()-1
_-.J H
~
~.~:~~~
:1 u[: ~
,~;~~j1
o Ur:QU
I
I
I
i
I
" " ' " .. f:"
- -('.J ").q-Il'l'
Ul (.1') f) If) en ~
" U) (f) to en .
XWW WW..J
~~ ~~Z:; ',.
>=:lA Q'::':"-\
",.J: <r<'l
,::;...
o
"'.
(""A
0J
Cj
.-J
W
U
OC
<I
(L-
,-Ul
a..Ul
<rW
l:;cr
yQ
>i. Q:'.::i A A ;.-!
~-<I.r:"'I<C(IN
,,1< lil
"l'l::l;!;:<l ;!l
~ <'0 ,.. "
']
~r"'~'
:J:
<J:
'"
;r
<=l
\1::: <::(
C
~~;;
::W
- > ~
'::J: Cl W
.::). (' ;
c
l~) C
'-' ~:>-,-
g;~ '-1:'
o
,:,1)
b
"
0",
C~
,'j
C" H
...:' _ 0:.:.: :=--
G"IWU}
~~ Ir~: ~ ~
(:'-. '.-. '- W.~
~:; .:r:' ~
~3 Ul (~) ,-:;
.-- >- -..c...:
~~2t
f': .:
~ :2
iF
JI
llJ
..J
!..lJ
~.
C l.n
u.. _ {'-~ 'i q- .', u.j
....... Ul to .J-; IJ - ,-; ~~
~ ~ t3 ~i :3J ~~;
::C;:L'~:!;:.;:::~~~
x i::~ .>~ ;2, .~ ,~'--
<:r. A t=. .~::. ,._. '-:I '-,
!-- ':I:.:r: <I: ,-r _I ;'0
.J
:; _':: _L'!-.E_ :i_~_:! ~~~_"
:;,., .,C;)
,.,
._(.~ <~
r
~~J~~~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~i~~~;~~~~~~~
..0,
f...)
Z
'-"
'"
~ S
ill
~ - u
z
>-
..J
l1.
0
0
..J U
H '0 .;J
>- '-" .J
i.1J C Z
W '" H
'" Ul '0 '" , ~.
>- W Oo:! i"'"
tn <i: '" -'.;
H c: ,~',
Ul W "-.I (f') ..J
j L1J .0 '" ". 0.:l 11':'
..J - '0 W I
H ::3 3 (~ u
~ ..'.' ::.; 0 - 1::1 Z
0 [.:.i ..J - )-
r- w 0 l1. '" u..
~ Xl
"'-1:
i
l;-"'--
w
Il.l
a::
<J:
0-- 'JM~
"- ()) (0 (J)
Il. G'? ..0 (Ij V1
<:: W I W w
::t: 0:: .'0:::: 0-':
XQ CQ
-<r:,~ Q-Q
.....<t <I<I
,
..",
W
Q
'U
- ,
u..
...
N
I
I
,
- N " . ~ ~ ~ - ~2 NJR
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~
o
u
\
'f
(;.; \
Jl
-r ..~ '.;> " co 0- ....-> ~- .,....
..., "'.n ...... u,.... ............ ....
i
I
!
r
..t-
I
i
I
I
i
r
I
-r-- .
&;:;l:\ :;;
:.i~l
~ ~
~ ~
~
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902.4596
(804) 296-5823
-'-
U ,~ \
\ .", ~e3
il i
J ne 17, 1993
omas-Cato, Inc
TN: Patricia Thomas-Cato
A The Billard Center '
o Greenbrier Drive, Suite E
arlottesville, VA 22901
SP-93-06 Thomas-Cato, Inc
Tax Map 61W, Section 1, Block A, Parcel 5
Ms. Thomas-Cato:
e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on June
1993, voted to suspends its Rules of Procedure and set a public
aring to reconsider the above-noted request. This request will
considered at the Board's July 14, 1993 meeting.
you should have any questions or comments regarding the above
ted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
nity Development
Greenbrier S~are Limited Partnership
Ella CareyV'
...
'\
i/'., V-'-( ',,'_c'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
. -}
l-iJ;': /' }~~J
D:J 1 r, '01 ,,_,' ...
h !uJ d Li' ;'Ci O' (.:i.n",
~' "'--"svL"
MEMORANDUM
William D. Fritz, Senior Planner ~
Amelia G. McCulley, Zoning Administrator~
April 7, 1993
SP-93-06 Thomas Cato, Inc.
Greenbriar Square Limited Partnership
is memorandum serves to address several concerns expressed by
mmissioners when reviewing this special use permit. Firstly,
e Zoning Administrator has determined that eight more parking
aces are required because the addition of sit-down dining
cilities triggers the restaurant parking standard. It is not
e sale of either food or alcohol that introduces the need for
re parking, but the fact that customers will be sitting down at
bles to consume them. Before the tables and chairs were added,
stomers would probably play a game of pool and then leave,
eeing up a parking space for another patron. Once the dining
cilities have been added, customers may linger and enjoy a
sack and a beer, thus creating the need for more parking.
e second issue raised by Mr. Johnson is the convenience of the
c urch's parking spaces to patrons of the billiards center. Sec.
4.12.3.4(b) requires that parking spaces for commercial uses be
I cated no farther than 500 feet from the entrance to the use
s rved by those spaces. All but several of the ten parking
s aces on the back property line lie within 500 feet, by
s"dewalk, of the entrance to both the church and the billiards
c nter.
e Ordinance states that the Commission may allow cooperative
rking and may reduce the amount of spaces required for a church
other uses under the provisions of a combined parking area.
e Zoning Administrator cannot, and does not, approve
operative parking arrangements. If the Commission were
ncerned that this parking arrangement would not work on this
rticular site, given either the design of the site or the
ture of the uses involved, the Commission could refuse to
prove cooperative parking in this case.
,-:
Comments on SP-93-06
I age 2
1 pril 7, 1993
lrom the minutes of the meeting, it appears that the Commission
ras indeed approved cooperative parking for the billiards center
end the church. Based on this decision, and pending approval by
the Board of Supervisors, I will approve a zoning clearance for
the restaurant at the billiards center.
lor your information, I have attached a list of the businesses
currently at the Greenbriar Shopping Center, the number of spaces
lequired for each use and the parking standard used to arrive at
the number of spaces required.
..
~
~
COCOLOC\/COCOC\/LOCO...-c\/OOC")O
C") C\/ C\/ ...-
"0
Q)
'-
.S
0'
Q)
a:
'*t::
0' al
E en
Q) ::J
C E ~
o 0 ~
'~ en ttl
~ ~ ~
'- 1..-. +-'
U ~ ~ ,~ 0-
~ .- c en
Cii E!9=o
e~uo__
.2 "0 ::- Q) ~ Q) Q) c
Q) 30G...-~~o
E Ottl.2en+oo'~
E en::=..--enen::;-::;-c
o ~ en Q) e Q)Q) Q) Q) E
~ EQ)COl>,CC,-
.:=~o~~.:=o:=:=~
gg.;: u 0'0'0.. 0-0' Q)
ww ttlenenEenenO
~gEEggQ)gg~
:::c\/Q)C\/::::::C\/C\/C\/t!)
,....:;::E;::,....,....:;::;:::;::<(
"0
'-
ttl
"0
c
ttl
Ul
OJ
c
~
'-
ttl
a..
CO~COOOOOOOOO
OO)C")Oc\/O)COLOLOLOO
CO~r-..r-..C")LO...-r-..r-..O)O
~ C\/C\/C\/C\/C\/ C")
.::=
0-
W
en
en
Q)
c
'us
::J
en
Q; ~ 0
cQ)'6
Q) .:?: ::J
()Q5(j)
"EoQ)
.!!l :i g
:r: ttl
enttlO
Q) ~ Q)
~a:~
c
o
\- .~
2 g
,-g>' t;
2u8: c
c >, ::J 0
Q)gw U
uQ)_I-'-
ttlOJ~~Q)
.0 '- .- I- E
::JQ)"O<(::J
U E ~ I I-
en(J)W""" a:
-g~Q)UU~
(J)I->~Z-;
>,
'-
o
~
'-
.6..
en
Q)
a:
~
'US
....
Q)
,:?:
C
::>
al
en
::J
o
~
Q)
....
ttl
~
-
0-
en
o
o
LO
--
...-
+
en
Q)
Q)
>,
o
a.
E
Q)
C\/
--
...-
>,
ttl
-l
I
o
-
.C
LL
ttl
Q)
....
ttl
>,
en
..... en
o-ttl
CI).::=
00-
o CI)
~o
"'-LO
+ r-..
Q) 0
Q)--
>,-
.20-
O-en
E LO
Q) r-..
-- --
...- ...-
00
LOO
r-..C\/
C")
..:
Q)
(J)
"@
,~
a.
o
I
--o~
C c '- U
ttl eel t> ....
ggQ).E
>>wu
co
~
...-
"0
Q)
'-
.S
0-
Q)
'-
en
Q)
u
eel
a.
en
OJ
C
~
....
ttl
a.
"@
o
I-
co
~
...-
o
en
Q)
en
::J
~
Q)
C
'-
o
.....
Q)
:~
en
c
o
en
Q)
u
ttl
0-
W
Q)
.0
eel
"iij
>
eel
en
Q)
u
eel
a.
(J)
'-'iQ 0-'
. i / ,- :?
(/-,;::; ',:;;;C.
-' . L_, j
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ME ORANDUM
M:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and communityi/~
Development
TO
E:
July 9, 1993
RE
ZMA-92-13 George and William Clark
losed are the latest proffers and plan for development of the
rk parcels in North Garden. These have been submitted in
ponse to Board concerns regarding the scale of development and
Board's decision to reconsider ZMA-92-13.
arding the scale of development, the applicant has proffered a
division of not more than 35 lots of not less than two (2) acres
size. This proposal is a reduction to less than the 52 lots
posed at the last public hearing. The subdivision's approval
1 be based on application of the County's subdivision
ulations, including verification of adequate building sites,
infields, etc.
arding prior staff concerns, this proposal is a reduction to less
n the 39 lots theoretically available based on the existing
cels. Therefore, the limitation of development to 39 lots until
roundwater study is approved and improvements to Route 712 and
occur is no longer relevant. Also, the development will be to
east and south of the floodplain boundary with no lots between
floodplain and Route 712 and 760. This limits access for the
elopment to one point along Route 712, removing the concern of
tiple entrances on Route 712.
St ff opinion is that the proposal is superior to the existing lot
co figuration or further subdivision that would result from the
co figuration. Staff believes the proposal adequately addresses
co cerns previously raised and is consistent with the Comprehensive
PI n's intention for North Garden to function as a Village.
/mem
~/
.
.",
L)1 'Jt.....T J\....
1<-ft-1;
...;...;,-I~ -, L.
, . . ,Ie:
(;': C,7JJ
:; ,.,";;. .~ ,-\ f. ~ .',
j \" \_1 ,\... t0~
G E 0 R G E & W ILL I A M C L ARK.j
Southern Hills Subdivision
Route 2, Box 75
North Garden, Virginia 22959
Phone (804) 295-6692
June 28, 1993
\.lormJ u.... J_ml~..l
lUU JJN '. I~ \~
kg~~D OF SUPERVISO~S
M . David Bowerman, Chairman
B)ard of Supervisors
Cpunty of Albemarle
4Dl McIntire Road
C~arlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Ri:,.: ZMA-92-13
George & William Clark
DO'ar Mr. Bowerman:
1 I would like to make the following proffers, conditional upon
rezoning request ZMA-92-13 being approved. These proffers are
substituted for prior proffers made by letters of February 17,
March 3, 1993, draft copy March 16, March 26, April 7, 1993,
April 12, 1993, May 13, 1993 and June 8, 1993.
2 The subject property will not be divided into more than 35
building lots, each being 2 acres or more, with over 25 acres
of the property left in its natural state. All development
will be in general accord with the same conceptual site plan
that has been submitted for staff's review and comment dated
June 28, 1993 and there will be no development on the road
side of the river. The outer boundaries of the development
will be along the flood plain line so as to preserve the size
and location of the natural area. The owner reserves the
right to re-design the location of the interior road and lot
lines to best accommodate 35 or less lots within the
boundaries of the developed area.
3 The main entrance to the subject property will be constructed
as shown on the conceptual site plan for Southern Hills
Subdivision, Architects Brown, Eichman, Dalgiesh, Gilpin, and
Paxton, dated June 28, 1993. The entrance will be in
accordance with and approved by the Virginia Department of
Transportation. The stream crossing as shown on the same
oonoeptual site plan and approved by SP-93-02 shall be
designed in accQrdance with County, State and Federal
Standards and Regulations. Plans and calculations shall be
submitted to the County Engineering Department for review and
approval prior to construction.
'"
M. David Bowerman, Chairman
JLme 28, 1993
Pl:lge 2
4 Underground gasoline and heating oil tanks will not be
permitted.
Very truly yours,
/
//'
George W. Clark
G~C/jc
III
..
Edward H. Bin, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David p, Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S, Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte y, umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
June 18, 1993
T THE PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESSED:
This is to provide notice to you, as an adjacent property owner, that the
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on June 9, 1993, suspended
i s Rules of Procedure and voted to reconsider ZMA-92-13 for George and William
C ark, as described below:
ZMA-92-13. George and William Clark. To rezone approximately
102.89 acres from RA to VR (proffered). Property in SE corner of
intersections of Red Hill School Road and North Garden Lane (Rts
760/712) . Site located in designated growth area (North Garden
Village) is recommended for village use (1 du/ac). TM87,P57C&66-77;
TM99,P109-116. Samuel Miller District.
The meeting will be held on July 14, 1993, 7:00 P.M., in Meeting Room #7,
S cond Floor, County Office Building. If you should have any questions, please
d not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
/.
(
.~/ I f 'I
// " ./'i LL..c.:,
El1.,a'w:-carey, Clerk
E C:mms
c
Richard Breckenridge
Curtis L. or Carolyn Byers
Robert Vernon or Helen C. Clark
David B. or Katherine Franzen
Vincent Leroy Jones
Aubrey M. Mays
George Edward Mays
John F. or Marguerite E. Mesinger
Kathleen M. Newbarr or Virginia Mays
Richard Parks, Jr., or Louvinia B. Oliver
Jean R. and W. Cato Powell
David W. or Patricia P. Simpson
John Linwood or Tracy R. Smith
Robert W. and Anne N. Smith
Kenneth F. and Barbara G. Stubbs
Kimberly A. Viglione
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Bill Fritz
(1)
Printed on recycled paper
It
I
lr
\
J
1
\
I
I
1
I
J
:j
J
)
I
'i
\
1
,j
.i
1
9
.~ I'
c."
"
I \
cJ'
fL'
~
.,
t~)
f"'l
':0 \
:L: \;
_ 0- .....~..
~~: ~~,~ ,: ;~; ~'. ~'-i ;'l ~:;;-~; 'I. .-, :-,
\
01
_I
I
~:
<i
Pi
s:-!
I
,n
o
i-D
i
. ~ ,-:;.>
.:.:;
__ ..r >~
.
m~
,>
.' '3
(:~
(;:,
i ::c ~~
_1 i:: Oii,.
,"- ;'-
;-1 U)
'j:,
':'>
I-:~
-:;. (:<
, ;- I.;', ,~
-1
,
,
,
,
.'
,
. ,
; 1 ~~: ~,_' ' : .:, - ,"3,
~m;;~m~
'_.) ~_~ ~_; ,~ ~.~ '..:- r~t 2 >~ ~::! Ll'l
'._j ,c, "
'.c' (_~ '.-:-:
I"
~H~~
.,'" j,
I
i
I
'-; u_ ,-'- I
] t~ ~
I ., I
'I' ,)) ,~, "1
.j
,
'-'-" :
I)) .-, ;"f
u": ;" ;.!
'f ", 21
i_..; ;:.~ .~
:~ ~~ 'i
I
..
, ; ::: ,~\ ~'-:
"
..
'"
',j' --; ,':J 'J -:j -~ -~-~~-~'i:;-;:--~;:--~; ;:
<)
'-:)
(:)
i :-.-
'..
f~ ~
r~ ~
~-'- ....
'..l_ ;{
-.1.
C
.1, ~: .i-. :.., ~; ::; ~ ~, .
I
I
I
I
I
~!
!i~
1\!C J
i' :"~. :~
..."....'...' ... .....
.1 :-3 " 'cOt
~ ::..;~
,~- ;;.
1
.-)
'-,
'.'i
" ~
~:!
:i
. "~
'-'I
I
.1
I
,~:: Li..;
~, )
j
,:\
I
i
I
I
:>
,~,~,
L"- '''-
c-'.= '~'-i
~i :;
..
.
-~-'::f::
,
I(
r
l..
,.
I
I
I
I
J
"I
"1
,~I
I
1
:i
~
-'
,_!
-,
:~ ()
c -'
(::;
:..i
.- <:::
" 00'.
;-"i:
::1
I
J
~
oj
d
, I
i
!
'J
J
J
I
;-;
','
C:i
=1
:1
I
I
-,~ r-t
~.' ,'"
:1
"- j
" ...
r-
([
::..
f ~:t 2
~ < <J:: ,"(
> '" .-~
,'.;:.
-1:
E
.x
"
"j
) <!: ,--'"
,')
1 -:
.}.o: __
<1
'_1..:...
'J ijJ
..'l :r:
.j ~~~ ~:~
c,
.j 'I '. '7 .j<.' J'
'.
"
1:
c.; 'C:'X
(', <C ::..
...: :::c: ; ('.-1 ~
,) ~.; ~ ~
:~; '<0'" a
;.--; 2:;~
> ;---' J
I.:)
'-)
r..;
"
....., ~ ,"-'
.L
,':;" ;:-~
,~ i--:~
'1,1"
L;j
'Z:
G.':u
r- !~
(I)
.:.:
- ,.-
-'- '-.....
.t j- !-
.. ('-~ ,~
~ -~- :2.
o->...i"'-"! ;.--,
> > iO-! ::'::
--. "-
:-:~ S ~~ ::i
.') ii', (.':
, -.
,0.; ...:.1 LL: i...~
'-:~ C C(. t~
:; ~~ ~ ;:{..~
'! .:( '.: ~
I
I
I
di
I _.J
Q
I~
I~
I:
,) c.t: :....
o
:~; :i :~ t=
~) t.il ~T ,:::.
on) ,.::::
,.:> -
,..~).. '-
(:) ".J
'..,) -J
(;) i.Ji
,}"
e~ .:;
O'Ll
Li
u
r'", '-.,
,:.;;. U.; 'i)
. . ......., '-'~ ~"-'
'; c.L: ~:.:. .::.::. u
':~~2~2C.~
. <r.' ...I"i:- <::
co
'''\
'"'
-I
:~
"
u
o
O.
o
,::;) I.
r-.... to:
~,.~
- I
~I
'- ~ Co; v:;
~~~~
I
~', ~
ii
,/"
"
,...
I
I
t
-;..
~
,->:
T
I'
e j
"f
I
i
""t
.'
;
-1
I,
j
"1 j
T 'fl,
'4 ,','t
" ~, )
] i.i..i u:
'-'.
1 ,~: <
!
fA'
f"
c'
,-, .... :2 ::..: ::-.' :~
..:, :-i
'_I..:. ':J i_:
.:) i'::'~..J:, ,
) ij)
:") ;;,..-;-+
.~
:-- c-:;
..c:: ~~i
); ,"
-, ':.....
~ i:""<
~.~
:3
,~,
'.;. ".i..
~ ." .:.,
.{ ~:
,;
, : :', <,r
'.!; U:' l.(
'_" i-,"; .
'z ,-r
:-': ~:
:; A ,', -.I "f 'J 'J :J ';,' ';( ~.
::.
'l
}1;.. :-
-' ~ C.C,., u..
..-.~ .~. '-.
:~ ..', ," ~-i
..-. ~
) ...:: ,~, :i:
>--
,x
<. ,-;: ;',
u:;
~J_
W
-;.::
,";::
: ~ :!. '~~
i~5
<c
.-
.,
-{:;::.:; c
<! ~
".",
~:{.
io,
- .,
-,I
><
L~
:E
1
'r
'.::
>
.r"' w
.!= ((1;:::;
_,~ u:; c
:..JLiJU
~3 CE .
~f 1: N
!
",I; ':.; -:; ~:; .; ,
. '.r'
<:I ,)
'. :> ..J
_J
c-t
.>
~ --)
~ --
--
., Ilj
,,- ...J
~
-: <:1. j
.. "I
01
....,
U
I
'j
.J
:-'-'1
:J
3
I
:"J
,',",
LJ
=1
'3
~
'3
W
'::.
""
.....
-,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
J ne 17, 1993
'@~i
; / r JlJM i
l . '", i
()4~::---'-i
'-~'PER\J'c-;"
~p
orge W. & William M. Clark
. 2, Box 75
rth Garden, VA 22959
ZMA-92-l3 George and William Clark
Tax Map 87, Parcels 57C and 66-76 inclusive and Tax Map 99,
Parcels 109-116 inclusive
Sirs:
e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on June 9, 1993,
s spended Rules of Procedure and voted to reconsider this petition at its
eting on July 14, 1993, A schematic drawing of the request must be
s bmitted to staff by June 28, the day before the hearing is advertised.
Please note that the Board did not request this matter be reheard by the
Planning Commission.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
.~a~
irector of Planning
Development
cc: Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins/
Ella Carey
f'~ __
G E 0 H G E & W 1 L L 1 A M C L
Southern IlJ..lls Subd1v1sion
Houte L., Box "/5
North Garden, V1rginia 22959
Phone (804) 295-&692
A l{ K
S~OSll\Y3dns :10 Qli'VOa
June 8, 1993
M . David Bowerman, Chairman
Bard of Supervisors
C unty of Albemarle
4 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, Virginia 22'J02-.4596
R ZMA-92-13
George & William Clark
D ar Mr. Bowerman:
1 I would like to make the ~0110w1ng pro~~ers, cond1t10nal upon
rezoning request ZMA-92'-13 being approved. These pro:t:tE'I'S are
substituted for prior prof~ers made by letters of February 17,
March 3, 1993, draft copy March Ib, March 26, April 7, 1993,
April 12, 1993 and May 13, 1993.
2 The subject property will not be divided into more than 36
building lots, each being 2 acres or more, with over 2~ acres
of the property left in its natural state. All development
will be in general accord with the same conceptual site plan
that has been submitted for sta~f's review and comment (jated
April 8, 1993 and there will be no development on the road
side of the river. The outer boundaries o:t the development
will be along the flood plain line so as to preserve the size
and location of the natural area. The owner reserves the
right to re-design the location of the interior road an(j lot
lines to best accommodate 36 or less lots with1n the
boundaries of the developed area.
3 The main entrance to the subject property will be constructed
as shown on the conceptual site plan for Southern Hills
Subdivision, Architects Brown, ~ichman, Dalg1esh, Gilpin, and
Paxton, dated April B, 1993. The entrance will be 1n
accordance with and approved by the Virginia Department o:t
Transportation. The stream crossing as shown on the same
conceptual site plan and approved by SP-'J;J--02 shall be
designed in accordance with County, State and Federal
Standards and Regulations. Plans and calculations shall be
submitted to the County Engineering Department for review and
approval prior to construction.
~, ,
MI. David Bowerman, Chairman
JLne B, 199::J
Pege 2
4. Underground gasoline and heating oil tanks wi~l not be
permitted.
Very truly yours,
! /-
f^,,~{ t' p:70 l'Y elL,
George W. Clark
G\ C/ jc
. -)': jJ'~ 9'3
GLOECKNER & OSBORNE, INC.
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND LAND PLANNERS
710 EAST HIGH STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE VIRGINIA 22902
TELEPHONE: (804) 971-1591
FAX NO: (804) 293-7612
/-
'1:3: t13/ C. Hz!__
~
-ft;
May 25, 1993
" . ,
I~:"\. m .~ ~ ~ Wi [~
: 'l) MAY 2 8 I9!li
r. David Bowerman
hairman of the Board of Supervisors
ounty of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
harlottesville, Virginia 22902
l BOARD OF SUPERVISORS j
Re-Hearing/ZMA-92-13
George Clark, VR Designation
David,
n this date it came to my attention that the above referenced
pplication was denied on a 3 to 3 vote. It distressed me to
learn that a single comment I made was taken out of the minutes
f the Planning commission and used as a reason for one
upervisor to vote: No. This comment was wrongfully used. I was
ever questioned about this comment during the Board Meeting. My
omment was that a surface water supply system would be necessary
o support a village residential community. As the minutes
eflect, this was in the context of my comments on all the
illages, not my clients small subdivision. When I refer to a
ommunity I think in terms of Earlysville, Hollymeade and Ivy,
ot a small 39 lot subdivision. The infrastructure for the small
ubdivisions should be the responsibility of the developers. The
ell systems and piping should be adequate. Wells to support
hese systems should be adequate. My comment of surface supply
omes in a time when there are 50 to 100 such small subdivisions
.n existence i.e., 40 to 50 years from now. I am sorry that I
ee so far into the future and my comments is interpreted to mean
hat each little subdivision should have a surface supply. I
ould respectfully request the opportunity to address this at a
e-hearing of ZMA-92-13 to clarify this matter.
hank you for your understanding. Please circulate this to the
ther members of the Board. Hope to see you at this meeting if
o required.
Sincerely, ~
'~~ ~ ------~ .
\'_ J,---/-r--
Kurt M. Gloeckner, President
GLOECKNER & OSBORNE, INC.
G:tpm
c: Mr. George Clark
t)' t ,. , . '';;') .~
'S "li"IJ'-',").,-i +.-) F)'-::" 1'11' '). j -.'
I, ! ~.I\_ ""..'''' ,_., . ',_"'"' ',_' .___' ..........
Agend~ !(~::i:' n:<;
Cj";) !';:')iC .j~
-l".....~,....-."c...........' '
..:.,.",.,/~
~
t./-Iq
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
Feb uary 24, 1993
Geo ge W. & William M. Clark
Rt. 2, Box 75
North Garden, VA 22959
RE: ZMA-92-13 and SP-93-02 George and William Clark
Tax Map 87, Parcels 57C and 66-76 inclusive and Tax Map 99,
Parcels 109-116 inclusive
Sirs:
Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on February 23, 1993,
the following actions regarding the above-noted petitions:
ZMA-93-13 George & William Clark - By a vote of 5-2, recommended denial
to the Board of Supervisors.
SP-93-02 George & William Clark - By a vote of 4-3,
recommended denial to the Board of Supervisors.
that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review
th's petition and receive public comment at their meeting on March 10. 1993.
new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted
the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your
eduled hearing date.
should have any questions or comments regarding the above-noted action,
do not hesitate to contact me.
~~ jJ~.
Ijcw /
cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
F PERSON:
NING COMMISSION:
D OF SUPERVISORS:
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
FEBRUARY 9, 1993
MARCH 10, 1993
Proposal to rezone approximately 102.89 acres from RA,
1 Areas to VR, Village Residential and to obtain a special use
it for a stream crossing in the floodplain of the South Branch
he Hardware River [30.3]. Property, described as Tax Map 87,
els 57C and 66-76 inclusive and Tax Map 99, Parcels 109-116
usive, is located in the southeastern corner of the
rsection of Red Hill School Road and North Garden Lane (Routes
and 712) in the Samuel Miller Magisterial District. This site
ocated in a designated growth area (Village of North Garden)
is recommended for Village Residential (1 dwelling unit per
) .
acter of the Area: The Red Hill School is located east of this
The roads fronting the property are unpaved. The property
tage with the public roads is floodplain. The property is
acterized by a long rolling ridge falling off sharply to the
h Fork of the Hardware River. Some of the slopes to the river
ar to be in excess of 25%. The property is currently used for
ure and most of the site is open. Numerous houses and the
ol are visible from the ridge on this property.
icant's Pro osal: The applicant seeks a rezoning to VR with
fers and the issuance of a special use permit to allow a stream
sing in the floodplain. All engineering data and subdivision
s would be submitted after approval of the rezoning and special
permit. Staff has received no information regarding the nature
cale of the proposed development. A letter from the
icant's consultant is included as Attachment C (Proffers are
uded as Attachment H). Approval of VR zoning would allow for
welling units. (This assumes use of the maximum theoretical
lopment potential. It is unlikely this level of development
d be achieved due to the significant floodplain area.)
RY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has reviewed these requests for
istency with the Zoning Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan and
ion 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance (special use permit) and
mmends denial of ZMA-92-13 and SP-93-02.
and Zonin
h 29, 1973 - Plat creating Parcel 57C was approved.
1
Y 20, 1977 - SP-77-38, a request for a custom slaughterhouse,
denied.
1980 - Plat creating lots under review recorded.
Co rehensive Plan: This site is located within the Village of
No th Garden and is designated Village Residential (maximum 1
dw lling unit per acre). The Comprehensive Plan contains two
co ents directly relating to this application "Hard surface and
wi en Route 712 and 760" (page 189) and "Verification of suitable
wa er supply shall be required for development proposals due to the
un ertainty of available groundwater and studies indicating
di ficulty in providing central utilities" (page 189).
(G oundwater issues will be discussed in later portions of this
re ort). The Comprehensive Plan states as a goal "Direct growth
in 0 designated growth areas." (page 156).
Open Space Plan indicates the South Branch of the North Fork of
Hardware River as a major stream valley with associated
odplain and critical slopes. Some sensitive soils (prone to
fl oding and shallow depth to rock) are present on site. The
majority of the site is suitable for development. The upland soils
ar good quality for septic fields. This site is not within a
re ervoir watershed.
eneral, it is favorable that the application is in a growth
a and that an existing substandard sUbdivision could be
raded. The new subdivision should provide protection for
sitive areas in the form of open space. The water quantity
stion needs to be resolved as well as access.
COMMENT:
is unable to provide specific comments regarding the nature
of the proposed development as no conceptual plan of development
has been submitted. Staff has requested information (Attachment D)
which the applicant has responded to (Attachment E). Staff has
id ntified the following issues to be addressed:
1. Suitability of Public Roads Serving This Site
2. Adequacy of Groundwater
3. Impact on Floodplain (SP-92-03)
4. General Character of Development
5. Development Impact to Public Facilities
of Public Roads Servin This site
of the roads which serve this site are unpaved and
olerable. Both roads are in the Six Year Road Plan for paving.
Route 712 project estimated advertisement date is July, 1995.
Route 760 project estimated advertisement date is July, 1996.
ase note these dates are under review). No entrance location
been marked by the applicant. However, access is most likely
2
North Garden Lane due to the slopes near Red Hill School Road.
proffers exist to limit the location or number of entrances. A
ffer has been submitted stating "The main entrance to the
perty will be located in the area of current lots 6 and/or 7 as
y front on State Route 712" (The plat of the property is
in luded as Attachment I). Staff notes that the plat recorded in
1980 indicates access over an access easement on adjacent property.
This access easement runs to North Garden Lane, south of this
pr erty. The Board of Supervisors has received one letter
re arding the need for improvement to these roads (Attachment F).
Le ters specifically addressing this application have also been
re eived (Attachment G).
ff has discussed methods of limiting development until such time
as the roads are improved. However, no proffer has been submitted.
Full theoretical development of this site could result in 740
ve icles trips per day. (Full theoretical development of this site
ut'lizing the existing RA zoning could result in 390 vehicle trips
pe day).
ff opinion is that the request, which could sUbstantially
rease the traffic volumes on unpaved nontolerable roads, is
onsistent with the intent of the ordinance, particularly
tions 1.4.1, 1.4.2, and 1.4.6.
of Groundwater
Comprehensive Plan states on p. 189 "Verification of suitable
er supply shall be required for development proposals due to the
ertainty of available groundwater and studies indicating
ficulty in providing central utilities." Staff has requested
t the applicant submit information to address the issue of water
ilability. The applicant has stated that availability of
undwater should be determined after approval of the rezoning
est. A proffer has been submitted regarding testing. The
ineering Department and the Water Resources Manager have
ented on the submitted proffers (Attachment J). The applicant
stated that a central water system may be used. Staff has
lude a resolution recently endorsed by the Board of Supervisors
m the Albemarle County Service Authority which discourages the
of central groundwater systems (Attachment K).
ff has identified one request in the North Garden area since
ption of the current Comprehensive Plan for which a groundwater
dy was required (SP-90-46 Albemarle Concrete). The study was a
dition of approval. It should be noted that the use was not
hin the Village of North Garden and made use of recycled water.
request which was not pursued was ZMA-90-10 Acorn Hill. This
a request to rezone from RA to VR. The method used to address
er availability was a surface reservoir. This proposal was not
sued. Other requests in North Garden were either by-right
elopments or did not involve intensification of use and
refore no studies were required. Developments requiring public
3
prior to approval were SP-91-17 Mooreland Baptist Church.
was a minor building renovation and South Fork Farms Rural
ervation Development which used existing development rights.
f opinion is that the use proposed would be inconsistent with
Comprehensive Plan as it relates to verification of groundwater
lies. A development of this scale, 74 lots, could have an
ct on area groundwater.
Im
on
SP-92-03
requested engineering data regarding the request for a
dplain crossing. No engineering information has been provided.
offer stating the approximate stream location has been
itted. The applicant has stated that information regarding the
sing will be submitted after approval of the special use
it. Staff is unable to provide a review of this request and
mmends denial.
ral Character of Develo ment
reviously stated, no plan of development has been submitted.
site has a large floodplain area and critical slopes adjacent
he South Fork of the Hardware River and an intermittent stream.
The e areas should be included as open space or in lots which have
building sites located so as to minimize negative impacts. Staff
can ot comment on the adequacy of any potential entrance. However,
an access point will require substantial grading to overcome the
st eam valley slopes. Staff notes that residential rezoning
re ests reviewed since 1980 have been accompanied by proffers for
de elopment design, scope and scale, most of which included
pr ffered plans. Staff is unable to state that areas sensitive to
de elopment will not be disturbed.
act to Public Facilities
request of the Board of Supervisors, the planning staff will
iew rezoning requests for their fiscal impact on public and
nsportation facilities. This analysis is limited to those
onings that have some effect on the facilities that are
ntified in our CIP or six year road plan and have a cost
ociated with them.
analysis will be based on a fair share determination of a
pa ticular development's impact to affected facilities. It must be
po'nted out that this analysis is cursory, due to lack of
in ormation on revenues and the amount attributable to this
de elopment. The cost outlined by staff only indicates the
pr portionate share of construction costs of the additional
de elopment generated by the rezoning over by-right development.
4
Facility Improvements and Impacts: The following are those
facilities which will be affected by the rezoning request:
A. Schools
Schools affected by this proposal are Red Hill Elementary (38
additional students which is 18 more than by-right), Walton
Middle School (18 additional students which is 8 more than by-
right), Western Albemarle High School (22 additional students
which is 11 more than by-right).
Projects in the CIP are:
Walton Middle School - Heating System
Western Albemarle High School pressbox
Western Albemarle High School Master Clock
Replacement
Western Albemarle High School Football
Bleachers
Western Albemarle High School Roof
Replacement
$284,000
27,000
22,000
56,000
550,000
Costs attributable to this development based on the
proportionate share of students is $9,303 or $125.71/dwelling
unit.
B. Parks and Recreation
The following projects are identified in the CIP:
Walton Tennis Court Resurfacing
Western Albemarle Tennis Court Resurfacing
Walnut Creek Park Improvements
$ 12,000
18,000
165,000
Based on service areas and capacities of the facilities and
additional residents located in the service area the costs
attributable to this development is $579.60 or $7.83/dwelling
unit.
C. Library
This proposal is considered to be in the service area of the
Main Library.
The projects scheduled in the CIP are:
Painting (Main Level)
Painting (Lower Level)
$ 10,000
9,000
Based on proportionate impact to the Library capacity the
proportionate share of this project is $87.14 or
$1.18/dwelling unit.
5
D. Transportation
Two projects are currently listed in the six Year Road Plan.
They are:
North Garden Lane (Route 712)
Red Hill School Road (Route 760)
Information
development
this time.
determined.
$450,000
300,000
concerning road capacity and traffic impact of
to the overall roadway network is not available at
Therefore, the overall cost impact cannot be
s
of Fiscal Im act
~alt n Middle School Heating System
~est rn Albemarle High School Pressbox
West rn Albemarle High School Master Clock
Re lacement
West rn Albemarle High School Football Bleachers
West rn Albemarle High School Roof Replacement
Walt n Tennis Court Resurfacing
West rn Albemarle High School Tennis Court
Re urfacing
Waln t Creek Park Improvement
Libr ry Painting
Total
Cost
Proposed
Share
Cost/OU
(74 OU's)
46.05
3.28
2.68
6.81
66.89
1.49
2.24
4.10
1.18
134.72
ause of the very general nature of this analysis, staff is not
ommending any action based on these estimates. They are presented
the Commission's and Board's information concerning the fair share
ermination of a particular development's impact on facilities based
the cost of proposed improvements and without regard to revenUe
rces and proportionate share of revenues generated by the
elopment.
284,000
27,000
3,408.00
243.00
sideration of the fiscal impact of the development needs to be
anced against consideration of the County's growth management policy
other County policies. Excessive development exactions could have
effect of discouraging utilization of the holding capacity of area,
thus, lead to accelerated development in the Rural Areas.
22,000
56,000
550,000
12,000
18,000
165,000
19,000
1,153,000
198.00
504.00
4,950.00
110.40
165.60
303.60
87.40
9,970.00
identified the following factors favorable to this request:
1. This site is located within the Village of North Garden.
2. This proposal may upgrade an existing substandard subdivision.
3. The roads fronting this site are in the six Year Plan for paving.
6
staff has identified the following factors unfavorable to this request:
1. No plan of development has been provided to indicate design scale
or scope of the proposal.
2. Roads fronting this site are currently non-tolerable.
3. Verification of adequate groundwater is not provided.
4. Impact to sensitive environmental areas is unknown.
5. The number and location of entrances is unknown.
6. The impact on the floodplain by the stream crossing is unknown.
Bas~d on the above factors, staff is unable to support ZMA-92-13 or SP-
92-03 and recommends denial of both requests. Should the Board of
Sup~rvisors choose to approve SP-93-02, staff recommends the following
contlitions:
RECbMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Department of Engineering approval of hydraulic analysis of the
stream crossing to ensure compliance with Section 30.3;
2. Department of Engineering approval of grading plans and
calculations;
3. Water Resource Management Official approval of Water Resource
Impact Assessment.
Ple~se note that no proffers have been submitted for ZMA-92-13.
The~efore, approval of ZMA-92-13 would have no limitations.
---~------------
ATT~CHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Letter From Applicant's Consultant
D - Staff Request For Information
E - Applicant's Response To Request For Information
F - Letter To Board of Supervisors Regarding Rts. 760 and 712
G - Letters Addressing This Application
H - Applicant's Proffers
I - Plat Of Property
J - Department Of Engineering & Water Resources Manager Comments On The
~pplicant's Proffers
K - Resolution From The Albemarle County Service Authority And Endorsed
By The Board Of Supervisors
7
'{
,<
:t
o
,
,'\ /'y1UlJ(fIl,J"!> ~ - - ....
.- "'j Tt) ...:~, -
.-/~
.... -:......
...... -
'~," ""I
I .
"\ .
.... ..,,-----
~d\'
.{ .~
)~_::.._,~.,}J91 \_ > ,_ ;,_ ,,' I"""
- _ _ _ _ L _ .J _ ~ _- ....
/',
. }
MOUN1AIN
I ATTACHMENT A I
~ 0'0/'1
<0'0""''''
Cat1.,
"
dl~
~t ~
\ ~ @E]~
\ -;. {
\'i \
. ~
H..rds ~ ~_
\ 1.,-,,-'/:.-'
I::>~~,I"'-'" 633
~~\@
\
CASlLE
ROCK
o \
.'
~.,
.
\
t
~t"
,
I
;l.
r ~,-
,
I
~
...
~
.'
J
,
.'
-.1:i
[
c.
\
I
",
~
"-"
"'"t'>',_
'1-
" ~~" .
" [ill"
,
'"
"
'0;,
,
,
fED',
"
"
\...
:,,'
i
.I
.....
,
~
.)
~
86
,.
y
(I
/(/1
I
~
I ATTACHMENT B I
~& I ~~/
~ .. --1-~" jr---J
A- ~ Y.. .:!~ .
.-i '-v r
zr1A-92-13
George & William _
Clark
~ '-..
-~
! ~
II
(
100
THE LAW OP'P'ICES OP'
MCCLU RE, CALLAGHAN, CARTER & ATKI NS
SUITE 200
415 P'OURTH STREET, N.E,
p, O. BOX 1333
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
M. CLIP'TON MCCLURE
ROBERT M, ;:ALLAGHAN
IUCHAI'D E. CAI'TER
D. MICHAEL ATKINS
GREGORY M .JOHNSON
March 3, 1993
TELEPHONE
(804) 977-6222
TELECOPIER
(8041 977-8190
...
Mr. William D. Fritz
Serior Planner
em nty of Albemarle
40 McIntire Road
Chcrlottesville, VA 22902
RECEIVED
Re: ZMA-92-13 and SP-93-02
George and William Clark
t.IAR :; 1993
Planning Dept.
De r Mr. Fritz:
On behalf of the applicants, I am authorized to make the
fo lowing additional proffers:
(1) No more than 39 units will be constructed prior to
Ja ~lUary, 1996 i
(2) The location of the stream crossing will be on the
bOlndary of Subdivision Plat Lots 6 and 7 or on the southern most
sije of Lot 7.
The applicants are agreeable in concept to the matters set
fo~th in Staff's Memorandum, however, I am still waiting for the
de~ails requested in my letter of February 25. If I receive such
de~ails prior to March 10, I will discuss our position at the
me~ting.
~l!J)fr
R~ar~ E. Carter
REC/asw
PRIN IPALS
GLOECKNER & OSBORNE, INC.
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND LAND PLANNERS
710 EAST HIGH STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE VIRGINIA 22902
TELEPHONE: (804) 971-1591
FAX NO: (804) 293-7612
IATTACHMENT cl
KURT M, GLOEC NER, P,E., P,L.S.
PRES DENT
BRIAN p, MITH, P.E.
VICE.PR SIDENT
January 26, 1993
;>,..t1 ~tf~-~
,..1 ,~\\j 2 7 199:5
Mr william D. Fritz, Senior Planner
Co nty of Albemarle
De artment of Planning & Community Development
40 McIntire Road
Ch rlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
P)Elnrj;p:CJ
rJ:I~i{~~.1.
~_.,..; t......' ;.....-7 Ln
J
Re ZMA-92-13 and SP-93-02 Clark Property (Southern Hills)
North Garden, Virginia
De r Mr. Fritz,
Clark has asked that I participate in representing his
oning and special permit requests at the Planning Commission
Board of Supervisors meetings. Unfortunately, I will be
ble to attend the Planning Commission Meeting because of
vious commitments. However, I was asked to write to you and
ress my professional opinions. Please forward these comments
the Planning Commission.
Fi st I will address the rezoning application. I find the
ap lication in order. The property lies in the North Garden
vi lage Area and having visited the land find that it will make a
fi e residential community. The land slopes nicely with only a
fe small areas that exceed 25%. Route 712, although presently
gr vel, is for the most part straight with good sight distances
in several places. Route 712 is very flat with gentle slopes all
al ng the frontage. There are an infinite number of subdivision
pI ns that could be drawn, however, this is not necessary until
th rezoning is approved. It is extremely expensive to optimize
a ubdivision plan without a rezoning. Our firm will design and
la out State standard roads when the time comes.
special permit for the stream crossing will provide the
per desired access. Large State standard box culverts to pass
00 year storm will be the first choice. A small bridge to
st te standards would be the second choice solution. The land
be'ng well drained shows no wetland characteristics. We will
no ify all appropriate agencies of the stream crossing upon the
roval of the special permit. Route 712 in front of the
perty will be the primary access with a secondary entrance
o paved Route 712 to the south over an existing easement to be
d for emergency purposes only.
IATTACHMENiC] I Page 21
Mr William D. Fritz, Senior Planner
Jalmary 26, 1993
Page 2
At this point I see no reason why the Village Residential zoning
an1a the stream crossing special permit should not be approved.
If you have any questions of me, please contact me prior to
February 4, 1993. I will be out of the country for a while after
th t date.
SincerelY; Ii ~ I
'~/v~~L
-------,
Kurt M. Gloeckner, President
GLOECKNER & OSBORNE, INC.
KM(li: tpm
cc George Clark
Leroy Yancey
I ATTACHMENT of
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
Jan ary 4, 1993
rd L. Eichman, Jr.
Browne, Eichman, Dalgliesh, Gilpin and Paxton
206 Fifth Street, N.E.
P.O. Box 2555
Cha lottesville, VA 22902
Mr. Eichman,
ve had an opportunity to briefly review your rezoning request
orth Garden. I have also spoken with Rich Tarbell who has
us sed this item with you. Staff has identified several major
are s of concern which I believe must be addressed prior to
review by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.
velopment of this size, approximately 102 acres and
itting an approximate gross density of 74 dwellings, needs
car ful planning in order to determine the feasibility and
appropriateness of the project. This site has significant
restraints due to floodplain area. The floodplain area will in
large part determine the location and character of development.
Th location of any access road(s) will likely require avoidance
of the floodplain. For the above-stated reasons issues of
ac ess, building areas, setbacks and buffers should be determined
at this time. The existing subdivisions is substandard and its
re onfiguration must be addressed. A sketch plat or plan or
de elopment would help to address all the above concerns. You
ma want to consider developing this site using a Planned
Residential Development approach.
you are aware, this site is located in the Village of North
den. The Comprehensive Plan contains many recommendations
re arding development in North Garden including "Verification of
su'table water supply shall be required for development proposals
du to the uncertainty of available groundwater and studies
in icating difficulty in providing central utilities" (page 189).
Su h verification will be necessary for appropriate staff review.
. \TTACHMENT 011 Page 2/
Mr. Edward L. Eichman, Jr.
Ja uary 4, 1993
Pa e 2
Both of the roads which border this site are listed as
no tolerable and the Comprehensive Plan shows both are to be
improved. The existing nature of the road system emphasizes the
nee for addressing the location of the entrance(s) to this site.
Met ods to limit the impact of these roads to that level
currently permitted by-right should be considered. These methods
would allow that at such time as the road(s) are improved the
full level of development could be undertaken.
Staff will prepare and forward to you a fiscal impact analysis
indicating the financial impact that this development would have
on the County's Capital Improvements Program. The Board of
Sup rvisors has requested this information for all residential
rez ning requests.
PIe se be aware that the above items represent a preliminary
rev'ew only, additional concerns may be identified with
add'tional review. Please respond, in writing, to the concerns
rai ed in this letter by January 15, 1993. Should you have any
que tions, please feel free to contact me.
William D. Fritz
Senior Planner
WDF/mem
cc: George and William Clark
I ATTACHMENT E I
BROWNE, EICHMAN, DALGLIESH, GILPIN & PAXTON, P.C.
ARCHITECTS
HENRY J, BOWNE, AlA
EDWARD 1. IrJICHMAN, JR., AlA
JOHN D. DA GLIESII, JR., AlA
W, DOUGLA GILPIN, JR., AlA
ROBERT L [AXTON, AlA
MARGARET W. DcMALLIE, ASSOC. AlA
Associate
January 14, 1993
MEGAN H, LOYD
Business Administrator'
M . William D. Fritz, Senior Planner
O~unty of Albemarle
D partment of Planning & Community Development
4C 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
RECEIVED
JAN , 5 \99:S
Planning Dept.
R: ZMA-92-13 and SP-93-02
Clark Property, North Garden, Virginia
D ar Mr. Fritz:
This is in response to your letter of January 4, 1993, related to the referenced
applications for George and William Clark's properties, and your subsequent letter to Mr.
CI~rk, dated January 12, 1993.
The Owners' interest is to develop a new subdivision plan which improves on that
wI ich now exists. Our interest is to create a new residential development which respects
ank! retains the natural characteristics of the site and takes advantage of countryside views
ff( m its higher elevations. We also hope to create a visually cohesive result by establishing
ar hitectural guidelines and controlling the design of site amenities such as an entrance
el ment, landscaping, fencing, signage, lighting and other development features.
However, the Owners' will incur considerable expense in the preparation of
de~elopment information which complies with current requirements and addresses
cop.ditions such as groundwater and public roads as referenced in both of your letters.
Bt cause both the zoning and one streamjfloodarea road crossing will affect the
coruiguration of a Development Plan, it is more cost efficient to establish those two criteria
be ore proceeding with the plan. This is the basis for the Owners' decision to first focus on
th e rezoning and special permit issues,
The second paragraph of your January Fourth letter indicates a need for careful
pI nning to determine the feasibility and appropriateness of the project, and to address
acr-ess, building areas, setbacks, buffers and other issues. We and the Owners agree with
th l>se concerns and intend to respond to all County requirements as part of a second phase
pI n approval process. For example, we intend to drill one or more domestic water wells
to establish specific groundwater availability for our development plan.
P,O, BOX 255 , 206 fifth street, n.e., CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902-2555
TELEPHONE 804.977-4480 FAX 804.296.8720
,; ATTACHMENTEl [page 21
BROWNE, EICHMAN, DALGLIESH, GILPIN & PAXTON, P.C.
M . William D. Fritz (cont'd)
Pa e two
14 January 1993
If the property were not in the North Garden growth area, the Owners would not
lik ly consider a zoning change. Rather, the request is in response to the county's interest
as stablished by the Comprehensive Plan. We, therefore, feel that is a sufficient basis for
royal of the request at this time.
Very truly yours,
BROWNE, EICHMAN, DALGLIESH, GILPIN & PAXTON, P.c.
By
~ ----~
~/-
----- . "
.. ~ '-- "---. ,.---
Edward L. Eichman, Jr., AI
E E:gwp
cc: George and William Clark
IATTACHMENT HI
THC L^W O",.,ccs or
MCCLU RE, CALLAGHAN, CARTER & ATKI.IN.S
SU'Te 200
415 ,.OURTH STReET. N. E.
P. O. BOX 1333
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
M. CLlrTO", MCCLURE:
ROBERT M CALL^GH^N
RICHARD . CARTER
0, MICH^E ATKINS
GREGORY f-I. JOHNSON February 17, 1993
TE:LEPHONE:
<804' 977-6222
TE:LECOPIER
<804' 977-8190
Mr. william D. Fritz, Senior Planner
Ccunty of Albemarle
4(1 McIntire Road
Ctarlottesville, VA 22902-4596
10 ~ .1"''- ~~'" Iii "i. t! r If''"\
:~ ~ ~tW,,. ~:b.;! ~:. ~ "-:'f ~~ ~.~
['IS 1 7 1995
Re: ZMA-92-13 and SP-93-02
George and William Clark
,-.. ,
i,-.j ,~, I'" J ,." '." e. ~-"1' , -
.' , r 'I' <I:J ~ 0 "' " .
.. "-..:." ~ : ~ ~'....... ,~, /( " j'
" . '~l.... ~.
Dear Mr. Fritz:
On behalf of the applicants, I am authorized to make the
following proffers:
1. Prior to the construction of any more that thirty-nine
(39) dwelling units, applicants will conduct tests to verify the
adequacy of groundwater for future units to be placed on the
property. The tests will include the following:
A. Drill at least one (1) test well and two (2)
monitoring wells to determine zone of influence. Locate all wells
on the property based on geological evaluation.
B. Complete a 48 hour draw down test followed by a
rEcovery monitoring procedure for a maximum period of eight (8)
hcurs.
TEst procedures can be observed by County Engineering Inspector and
tE st results reviewed by Engineer ing and Planning and Community
DEvelopment staff.
2. The main entrance to the property will be located in the
area of current lots 6 and/or 7 as they front on state Route 712.
3. The location of the crossing of the stream will be on
ctrrent lots 6 and/or 7.
REC/cab
-y~~/y ~~o:::-!~
/f7lbr.
Rid~rd E. Carter
I
...
z
w
~
J:
()
~
~
"
ll:
..
-J
U
"
Q ~ ~
~ ~ Ii
~ <<J ~
~. :s ~
l-
ll:
'"
'"
'?
.
: Q:' ~
t ~ ~
:: ~ ~"
~ "') ~
'" Q
...
~
:!
:;
..,
..,
'"
it
~
'"
~
8
"'vi I ~
-u I
.. 8 I
f-<o ~
o~ I
-'00
8
~
"
,
...
g
==:1 '8
.. . "
f-m "
. 0": "
? ...Joo ~
.;;
~
"
'.
ClIvi
-u
..
f-co
0":
-'00
co vi
u
f-"
08
-'or;
00;
-u
..
f-_
0""
-'00
.,",9 '06
U3
,'" ;, ,'" ~ ~ ~ ~8
t~ C~ ~~ f~t~ t~ 'Sl
. · ~ .. ROUT E
STATE
"t..rcS'",_
-- Q~,
-J
-J
'"
0\ :t. _ ...
.., 0 ~;:
ct: CL 0.: Q,;
l Co
: l4.: ~ ~
~ ~ 6 ~
:l;
q
-..
0I1J!;6
~.O..f"OoI9 S
/
M,pl, 9f o6BS
ll:
'"
:>
Q) ~ ~
~ 0 ~
~ .
~ a. ~
; ~ ~
, q
:r
v
it
:r
';:
~
"r "
~,. ~;~ro. _ "
d-~O' ...."""oJ' ~o
~
~ " -
~ .
~ '" ~
~ ~ ~
:: q ~
:l (t/ ~
, ~
f-
ll:
'"
'"
o
Q;
.o>",;~
I -?ct<9~l> 1-
, I..} ,o~f.i~<f'...;
,/ .."'~
/ / -?c:;% <;,;,
I ;' ~4irY""'" 1:::
/ .' ~Rf~~.!'" ..::>
II '~,."o
.. -1C;~~/"" q:
/ ! "osf1.!.i,^,
~ f .. )'..offtta
~I / . S\-I\I
"sr/ ' ~'u(~!IJ\i
, I
! i ~.t~
\\ifR&1b.
'I", ul
\, t M..~o~~N ':d.
\ \ JIJ,6J,6IoIZ/Ii \-
\ \ ,'i?$Jk' U)
~.~J;-']N
760
....
.R-~
;:~
~Q)
~.
'I. \
, \
\ \
\ \
'. \
\ \
\ \
; \
....~t/Ot('
1". \'~^'
~2 .~~ \ \
~~ ~.r}
~ ~
1..-(
~ '. _~1:"\
~ t '1.":. .
}.!,.~,~~ :
..." I.... _..........{
/\~
(~
ll:
'"
~ ~
q ~
-J l;)
ll:: a. ll:
llJ S: :;
f- q
'"
0 -J '"
'"- 0: -J
-J
'" ".
'" C
>- (0
ll:: '" ..,
ll:: ,. f-
0 u: I-
'" 0
~ V) -J
Cl '"
"
~ <: J:
"
~ -J U
'2-
0 OJ
UJ ~ D
:> ~.~) ~
W ,- "'.:
u c.:>
\W ,'i
\.!.l
~ L'.-
l;)
"
~
o
J:
V)
I-
..
...J
a.
"
o
Oi
:;
Q
CO
:::>
V)
>- l-
I- u
a: a: 0
I.1.J I- CO
C/) m
a.. a oj
0
a: -J ~ '"
G: <: n::
a.. ii: '"
<.:> Cll
~ UJ ll:: ::!:
I- '"
a: C/) :::. ::>
(3 0
<:t >-- <:
G:
-.J ~ f-
W (.) <:
Q: ::> '0
J:: 0
f- ~ UJ u 0
-J '"
'"- -J
0 I.1.J '"
~ -'
~ ~ ll::
-J ~
a:: UJ ~ '"
0 ::> llJ -'
'" I.1.J ~ co ..
I- G: -' u
0 ~ C/) ~ '"
-J
'\
RE:
IATTACHMENT JI
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
William D. Fritz, Senior Planner
~irschman. Water Resources Manager; Jack KQ ~ngineer II
February~1993 ?:J0'
SP-93-02 ; George and William Clark Proffers
The proffers submitted by Richard Carter, dated February 17, 1993, have been reviewed as
req ested and we offer the comments listed as follows:
1. Proffers should indicate the hiring of a qualified individual(s) and/or firm(s) to
conduct the study. The work should include participation of a certified
geologist and a licensed engineer to sign off on the study.
2. One (1) test well is not enough to characterize the probability of groundwater
availability. Particularly since it is so variable over small geographic areas.
Proffers should specify three (3) test wells minimum, and 48 hours should be
the minimum draw down time for the tests. Well tests should be in accordance
with County standards and regulations.
3. Proffers should state that pump test monitoring shall include simultaneous
monitoring of the two (2) closest wells on adjacent properties for each test well.
4. Proffers should state that the study shall look at historical drought and
summertime water table conditions, and this information related to the pump test
data.
5. Proffers should state that the study shall identify recharge areas on and near the
property and measures should be proferred to prevent groundwater
contamination by protecting recharge areas (through easements, etc.). At a
minimum, septic drainfields and structures should be kept off of identified
recharge areas.
6. Proffers should state that the study shall indicate areas inferred to be unsuitable
for wells based on geologic and hydrogeologic information from the site.
r
IATTACHMENTJllpage 2\
7. Proffers should state that the procedures, results, and conclusions of the
completed study shall be compiled in report form and submitted to the County
Engineering Department for review and approval.
8. Proffers should reiterate that no more than 39 dwelling units may be constructed
until the report, concluding that there is adequate groundwater to serve the
additional dwelling units, has been approved by the Engineering Department.
9. Proffers should state that the stream crossing shall be designed in accordance
with all County, State and Federal standards and regulations. Plans and
calculations shall be submitted to the County Engineering Department for
review and approval prior to construction.
10. Proffers should specify that the location and design of the entrance to State
Route 712 shall be in accordance with and approved by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
DJI /JMK
CC Jo Higgins - Director of Engineering
~rTACHMENT KI
I ,
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, many citizens of Albemarle County have been
inco~venienced by the failure of central groundwater systems, and
WHEREAS, much public money has been expended connecting these
fail~d systems to the public water system, and
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Service Authority does not
consider central groundwater systems to be a reliable, permanent
sour~e of water for sizeable populations,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of
the ~lbemarle County Service Authority recommends to the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County that requests for central
gro~ndwater systems be carefully evaluated and, if approved,
SUbIl itted to Albemarle County Service Authority for review and
cowent and, if requested by Albemarle County Service Authority,
req\ ired to be designed and constructed in accordance with
AlbEmarle County Service Authority specifications.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I, J . W. Brent, Secretary-Treasurer, do hereby certify the
abo~e to be a true and exact copy of a resolution adopted by the
Boa d of Directors in a regularly scheduled meeting on December 17,
199~ by a vote of
5
to
o
r(2v A~~
Br t~ s~cretarY-TreaSurer
J.W.
.-~
..
ill
JJl , 41!m
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
J ly 14, 1993
U ited Land Corporation
A TN: Wendell Wood
P.O. Box 5548
C arlottesville, VA 22905
: ZMA-92-I4 Wendell Wood
SP-93-I3 United Land Corporation
Tax Map 32, Parcels 50, 53, 54, 55 and 56
ar Mr. Wood:
e Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
ly 13, 1993, by a vote of 6-1, recommended approval of the
ove-noted petitions to the Board of Supervisors. Please note
at ZMA-92-14 is subject to the following proffers:
1. The mobile home park is proffered for a period of not less
than 15 years from the start of development in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan. The start of development is
defined as the date the first building permit is issued.
(The Planning Commission accepted this proffer with the
understanding it would be amended before reaching the Board
of Supervisors to provide for a mechanism to return RA
zoning to the property in the event the special use permit
is not perfected.)
2. The frontage of Route 29 containing Tax Map 32, Parcels 43A,
43, 42E, 42D, 42B, 42C, 42A and Tax Map 46, Parcel 5 shall
contain not more than three entrances. The County may
require closure of any existing entrances at the time of
establishment of any new entrance such that the total number
of entrances does not exceed three.
~..-'
~
U~ited Land Corporation
J~ly 14, 1993
PFige 2
3. An access road between the mobile home sales area and mobile
home park shall be developed at the time of establishment of
the mobile home sales use. This access road shall be used
only for the movement of mobile homes between the two uses
and for emergency access.
S~-93-13 is subject to the following conditions:
1. Deletion/relocation of all lots within 50 feet of an
adjacent parcel;
2. Planning Commission approval of final site plan;
3. Staff approval of all mobile home units proposed for
location within the mobile home park to ensure compliance
with the acoustical performance standards of Section 30.2.5;
4. Staff approval of private road maintenance agreements at
such time of the property may be subdivided;
5. Maintenance of recreation facilities shall be the
responsibility of the property owner in accord with Section
4.16.3.2;
6. No direct connection to Route 29 shall be made without
amendment of this permit;
7. Provision of a conventional "T" intersection with Route 606
constructed in accordance with Virginia Department of
Transportation requirements. Access is shown on a plan
initialled WDF dated 7/8/93;
8. No plan of development shall be submitted for review until
the necessary easements and/or right-of-way acquisition for
the Route 606 entrance have been obtained;
9. Provision of access to Tax Map 32, Parcel 46.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
w~ll review this petition and receive public comment at their
m~eting on July 14, 1993. Any new or additional information
r~garding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the
B~ard of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled
h~aring date.
..~-'
.
United Land Corporation
J~ly l4, 1993
P/:ige 3
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above
noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Slincerely,
yU/~9
Wlilliam D. Fritz
S~nior Planner
WDF/mem
cb: River Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership
Tom Muncaster
Amelia McCulley
Ella Carey
Muncaster
Engineering &
Computer
Applications
I
338 Rio Road ~
Charlottesvil1e~ VA 2290_1__1__ I
804-978-7879
July 14, 1993
REOEIVED
JUL 1 4 1993
Planning Dept
Mr. William D. Fritz, Senior Planner
De}; artment of Planning & Community Development
Alb~marle County
401 McIntire Road
Cha rlottesville, Virginia 22901
Re: Airport Mobile Home Park (ZMA-92-14, ZMA-93-06)
Dee r Mr. Fritz:
ThE following proffer is offered as a substitute to proffer #1 in
my letter of July 6, 1993 regarding this rezoning request:
The mobile home park is proffered for a period of not less
than 15 years from the start of development in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan. During that period of time, the
property shall not be available to any other R-15,
Residential uses except nothing contained herein shall
prohibit the Zoning Administrator from authorizing uses
deemed accessory and subordinate to the mobile home park. In
the event the conditions of SP-93-13 are not fa met, or at
the time of expiration of SP-93-13 in accordance with
Section 31.2.4.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant shall
permit the property to be rezoned to RA, Rural Areas by the
Board of Supervisors and thereafter the property shall enjoy
all RA uses. For the purposes of this proffer, the term
"start of development" is defined as the date of issuance of
the first mobile home building permit. Nothing herein shall
prohibit the Board of Supervisors from granting an extension
of the expiration date of SP-93-13 in accordance with Section
31.2.4.4 of the Zoning Ordinance.
WTl'/
Sincerely,
W.~9L4
W. Thomas Muncaster, Jr., P.E.
..
m' ~ 14~ rn
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
Ju Y 14, 1993
Un"ted Land Corporation
AT Wendell Wood
P. . Box 5548
Ch rlottesville, VA 22905
RE: ZMA-92-14 Wendell Wood
SP-93-13 United Land Corporation
Tax Map 32, Parcels 50, 53, 54, 55 and 56
r Mr. Wood:
Th Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
July 13, 1993, by a vote of 6-1, recommended approval of the
ab ve-noted petitions to the Board of Supervisors. Please note
th t ZMA-92-14 is subject to the following proffers:
1. The mobile home park is proffered for a period of not less
than 15 years from the start of development in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan. The start of development is
defined as the date the first building permit is issued.
(The Planning Commission accepted this proffer with the
understanding it would be amended before reaching the Board
of Supervisors to provide for a mechanism to return RA
zoning to the property in the event the special use permit
is not perfected.)
2. The frontage of Route 29 containing Tax Map 32, Parcels 43A,
43, 42E, 42D, 42B, 42C, 42A and Tax Map 46, ParcelS shall
contain not more than three entrances. The County may
require closure of any existing entrances at the time of
establishment of any new entrance such that the total number
of entrances does not exceed three.
;.
Ul ited Land Corporation
J\ly 14, 1993
Pcge 3
I you should have any questions or comments regarding the above
n(~ted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
S ncerely,
.?P~9
W lliam D. Fritz
SEenior Planner
WlDF /mem
cc: River Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership
Tom Muncaster
Amelia McCulley
Ella Carey
-~ .
/ ^ (' "' .._ ,i I~..'~.. t:_::,~ ~"^,....,_.
:-' I; \ ':...... " .._)
.'\./ v _
" )('i ~~.
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
Protecting The Environment Is Everybody's Business
STATEMENT REGARDING ZMA-92-14 & SP-93-13
e Piedmont Environmental Council recognizes that manufactured housing in
g neral, is less ideal than constructed--although it is improving all the time--and
t at other aspects of this proposal my be less than ideal. We also recognize the
c ncem that this proposal will encourage growth in toe County, However, the EE.e.
c ntinues to believe that houses do not cause growth, but that they are a response to
g owth induced by economic expansion.
ere is, however, a real shortage of decent affordable housing in Albemarle, This
a function of the pressure on housing created by the simple fact that we are a very
f st growing area, with internal housing pressure increased by having a major
r sidential university in our midst. Over the past decade a number of existing
anufactured housing parks have been closed and not replaced. The economics of
a ordable housing are such that providing for it where adequate sewer, water and
ansportation is available prices such housing out of the market. While public
p "vate partnerships for the provision of affordable housing, such as the project in
rozet, are important, the legal and practical complexity of such projectsnand the
n ed for ever declining public subsidies--means that the number of units which will
b provided in the near future by such partnerships is limited.
favor of the proposal are these facts: the need for housing already cited; the
oposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is relatively isolated from
her types of residential development; the site is close to adequate transportation;
a d it is also close to major present and future employment centers in the County.
I short, it is the best partial answer to a persistent problem to come along in a long
t' e. As the staff report also points out, denial of this application would discourage
u e of the holding capacity of a designated growth area and increase development
ssure on rural areas. Finally, we do not believe it is good policy for the County to
s mply ignore those who work here but cannot afford the average house and trust
t at they will live in some other county.
or all of these reasons we support ZMA-92-14 and SP-93-13 -- with the conditions of
a proval recommended by the staff, which we think are necessary to insure that this
roject will provide quality housing not just cheap housing.
im Undstrom, Director of the Charlottesville office
28-C Main Street, Box 460, Warrenton, Virginia 22186/703-347-2334/Fax 349-9003
1010 Harris Street, Suite 1, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903/804-977-2033
"
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
l\ \ \ H . iTi//! t..",v 1 ~
/7-F3-1'5
Protectillg The Ellvirollment Is Everybody's Busilless
~. 1
[OJ m te ~ D~ lW
lJ\l . ""'" J ~ i
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS I
STATEMENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
ON ZMA-92-14 & 82-93-13
JULY 13, 1993
My name is Reuben Clark. I am Chairman of the Charlottes-
~ille/Albemarle Board of the Piedmont Environmental Council (PEC).
PEC recognizes that manufactured housing in general is less
ideal than constructed housing -- although it is improving all the
time and that other aspects of this proposal may be less than
ideal. We also recognize the concern that this proposal may
e courage growth in the County. However, we believe that houses
do not cause growth, but are a response to growth induced by
economic expansion. ~
There is, however, a real shortage of decent affordable
using in Albemarle. This is a function of the pressure on
using created by the simple fact that we a very fast growing
ea, with internal growth stimulated by having a major university
o'J.r midst. Coer the past decade a number of existing
m.~nufactured housir:g parks have been closed and not replaced. The
e onomics of affordable housing are such that providing for it
were adequate sewer, water and transportation is available prices
s ch housing out of the market. While public private partnerships
r the provision of affordable housing, such as the project in
ozet, are important, the legal and practical complexity of such
ojects -- and the need for ever declining public subsides --
ans that the number of units which can be provided in the near
ture by such partnerships is limited.
In favor of the proposal are these facts: the need for
fordable housing already cited; the proposed usage of the site
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is relatively
olated from other types of residential development; the site is
ose to good transportation; and it is also close to major present
d future employment centers in the County. In short, it is a
ry good partial answer to a persistent problem. .. As the staff has
ted, denial of this application would discourage utilization of
e holding capacity of growth areas and put increased pressure on
velopment in our rural areas.
28-C Main Street, Box 460, Warrenton, Virginia 221~(,/703-347-2334/Fax 349-9003
1010 Harris Street, Suite 1, Charlottesville, Vir"1;1!a 22903/804-977-2033
1
,
S~ATEMENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
O~ ZMA-92-14 & SP-93-13 (continued)
Jl~LY 13, 1993
Finally, we do not believe it is good policy for the County
tp simply ignore those who work here but cannot afford the average
hpuse and trust that they will live in some other county.
For all of these reasons we support ZMA-92-14 and SP-93-13
w'th the conditions of approval recommended'by the staff, which we
t ~ink are necessary to insure that this proj ect will provide
q~ality housing, not just cheap housing. Our only reservation is
w~th respect to the staff support for the display office on Rt. 29.
W~ do not believe this part of the proposal should be approved
uptil the conditions set forth in the amendment to the Plan are
m~t.
N i j I Ji.... { i t J J t' lu / l-j
1?-!~s-9~
~ u w rn ~1~1~1
JL" ! ,4 19oo L i i
JI
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS j'
To: Plann~ng Comm~ss~on ~
Fr m: Unders~gned N~ll Run Homeowners and Reg~stered Voters
Re: Proposed Hob~le Home Development on Rt 606
1m ~
We are opposed to the development oi
Rt 606 because oi the adverse ~ mpact
magn~tude would have on our local school,
main commute route, Rt. 743.
a 236 un~t mob~le home on
a development oi such
Broadus Wood, and on our
Nill Run is a 15 home subdivision with 30 ch~ldren--13
c rrently attend~ng Broadus Wood and 7 more attend~ng ~n the next
i years. We are concerned that the recent renovat~on we
s ruggled w~ th dur~ng the past year w~ll be ior naught as the
t a~lers we thought had been replaced will be returned to
a commodate more ch~ldren. Once aga~n B. W. 'W~ll be overcrowded,
s resources w~ll be stretched, park~ng w~ll get t~ghter,
p i~elds and playgrounds w~ll disappear, and we w~:ll be
a why county planners are approv~ng developments beiore
s are ~n place to accommodate them.
T is currently no commun~ty ~n the Broadus Wood d~str~ct as
1 rge as th~s proposed one. II the ratio oi ch~ldren to homes that
w have in our development holds ior the trailer park, we could be
1 ok~ng at close to 460 ch~ldren need~ng schoo_l~ng, 150 at the
e ementary level. Please note, ~t ~B not the tra~lerB we object
Ii th~B proposal were ior a luxury townhouse development we
w ul.d be equally as opposed. Since aiiordable housing ~s
n cessary, why not lim~t the appl~cant to a development oi Bay 40
h meso Th~s s~ze development would st~ll be larger than most OI
t e developments ~n the Broadus Wood School d~Btr~ct, yet the small
expansion that did take place could accommodate th~s
srall growth.
is not right or Ia~r to taxpayers Ior developers to reap the
nei~ts oi br~ng~ng large numbers oi people ~nto a commun~ty and
en expect the commun~ty to bear the cost and burden oi prov~d~ng
rv~ceB ior these people. Ii the Plann~ng comm~Bs~on bel~eves the
alai aiIordable houB~ng ~B OI such ~mmed~ate value that approval
th~s enormous development ~s ~mperat~ve, then have the developer
~ld a new school or donate the land ior ~t to relieve
ercro'\fd~ng at exist~ng schools and have h~m share part OI the
st OI w~den~ng roads to ensure our saIety and rel~eve cong(~st~on
eX~Bt~ng roads.
I add~tion to the overcrowd~ng oi our schaal, the enormous s~ze oi
,~s proposed development ~nsures that already overcrowded morn~ng
B' d even~ng commute routes w~ll get worse. Host OI our homeowners
Rt 743, a narrow, curv~ng road to commute to Charlottesv~lle,
as you must know there ~s no publ~c transportat~on ava~lable ~n
r area. People need to have cars to go anywhere. The traiI~c ~s
ready bumper to bumper dur~ng the rush hours and v~rtually stops
bottleneck po~ntB. Add~ng any more cars, espec~ally 236 homes
rth OI cars, w~ll make th~s congest~on worse and threaten saIety
more cars w~ll undoubtedly result ~n more acc~dentB.
We are opposed to the development of a 236-home
mobile home park on Rt. 606.
) 1'_ .4. ~;d&~)-IJfL
~~O~__I------
. ~!~n(('If/i J <! '/h( . )
If// ,_ 1\,//,1; '/'~/,---/
J/j: :/:L
~\, . \\ ~-y \, I 0 J
'l,...i,.\,,;J.:... ,JJ IN., _ ___
./ntcL'C,C;:; ./1. lL/Ll:j
. (/)
JL~ i ~I);: . ~...
U\
'~- >;;.
.AY-r~\) (.e..
/;( ,:
I ,'.'
/ ;/
, / 1\ '~~..\L>'/
,-b,\~\\ -...l....?~ \,-,1-
" ..~
ck ,l)'[ i?"--
(1l ~ c/l1~
"'( 'I P''J'
Wv-L.-c./ C_. ;::1 Pf/V1b,-~ _/
-~'- ~-'
07/1 193 14~54
'!'8049773748
MED eTR FJNANe~
Robert T. Mares, Jr.
730 Lochridge Lane
Eariysville, VA 22936
(804) 974-6681
~,_..-.....~.~._~
July 12, 1993 .
SUPERVtSOR~
e ounty
Board of Supervisors
By Facsimile
Dear Mr. Bowerman:
We would like to voice our opposition to the creation and development of the 236 unit
trailer park off Route 606, near the airport.
Our o~jection is simple. Yeu and the school board are presently in a dilenuna over school
crowding and re-districting, Adding some 250 - 500 potential students to this situation
makes no sense. It can onJy result in a large. disruption in the lives of the current student
population, forcing school changes and extended busing,
This is not a social issue. You can put 250 million dollar mansions on the same property
and the issues don't change. What are the developer's responsibilities? He is in business to
make a profit. Yet, what is he contributing in the way of providing for schools and other
services? Where is the sense in all this?
We hope the Board of Supervisors considers the needs of its constituents.
S.
Robert t.
~ U.~~
Cathy H. Mares
es
llMl
e
e
e
...,J ,
HC 01, Box 82
Earlysville, VA 22936
July 12, 1993
A tn: William Fitz
A bemarle County Planning & Community Development
C unty Office Building
4 I McIntire Road
C arlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
RECEIVED
JUL 1 2 199.3
: ZMA-92-I4 and SP-93-I3.
Planning Dept.
Bill:
I am in opposition to approval of a Special Permit to allow the
e tablishment of a Mobile Home Park on 57 acres at the Charlottesville
A'rport location. My reasons are as tollows:
1. On the basis of the appearance of other mobile home parks in
o r area, although initially the park may have a good appearance, since
er income residents are involved, in the long run the park will tend
t depreciate along with the entire surrounding area. If the developer
with his resources were to remain managing this mobile park into the
f ture, the success of the park would be better assured. However, the
d veloper will likely move on to other projects leaving the mobile home
p rk to an uncertain future.
The location at the south end of the airstrip will be the first
our area by many air passengers, as they fly to and from
Virginia. After they land and obtain their luggage, a few
m.nutes later many of these passengers may again drive by this mobile
e park. When our Airport Oft ice Center building was constructed in
89, I was repeatedly advised how important it was to develop an
tractive building and site because this would be the first and last
pression air passegers would have of our area, and I considered this
obligation. Again when the new multi-million dollar airport terminal
s recently built, the main objective was to otfer incoming air
ssengers attractive terminal facilities to make a favorable impression
i our historically renowned area. The mobile home park is inconsistent
w'th these objectives.
3. At the south end ot the Airport, what kind of owner or tenant
w uld want to live in this mobile home park with the constant airplane
n ise? The quality of life offered is already lowered to a questionable
d gree by unabated noise.
e
.
.
I
--
"
- 2 -
4. From the mobile home park entrance on Route 606, Route 749,
(~irport Road), and Route 743, one can anticipate increased traffic from
a variety of vehicle types, adjacent to the already dangerous
i~tersection at the Airport entrance (Routes 749 and 606). A large
vplume of traffic from residents living in western Albemarle County will
p~ss this mobile home park entrance daily on their way to employment or
spopping along US 29 North.
5. There will be an additional strain on an already overloaded
f~cilities at Broadus Wood School, Earlysville, and perhaps other
s hools.
6. I believe the developer controls over
w~ere the mobile home park would be operating.
i~stead of 254 living units on 57 acres, there
m~ny living units in the future?
150 contiguous acres
Is it likely that
might be three times this
In my opinion the proposed mobile home park is incompatible with
t e goals and objectives of the Charlottesville Airport, the surrounding
n ighborhoods, and the objectives of our Chamber of Commerce in
p omoting good business, tourism and our historic heritage throughout
C ntral Virginia area. If approved, there will surely be problems,
g aranteeing friction and continuing controversy.
I strongly urge this request for a zoning change and/or special
pErmit be denied.
Sincerely,
~~~
!: Hahn
.
.
.
~
REOEIVED
Mr and Mrs. Wayne Hotchkiss
42 0 Pine Grove
Ea lysville, VA 22936
JUL 1 2 1993
Planning Dept.
Mr Bill Fritz
c/ Department of Planning and Community Development
40 McIntire Road
Ch rlottesville, VA 22902 July 12, 1993
De r Mr. Fritz,
We are writing to you to voice our opposition to the mobile
e park that is currently being considered for the intersection
606 and 743 near the airport. We hope that you will listen to
consider our concerns as well as those of other homeowners in
area.
We are very concerned about the negative impact that an
itional 256 families would have on the area. We would like you
know that we strongly oppose this project for the following
sons:
The roads and schools and public facilities are already
rloaded as it is.
There is a tremendous amount of development already in progress
this area. As we understand it, Forest Lakes South will add
ther 800 homes over the next few months. (Just think about
s. If each of those 800 homes has an average of 2 drivers in
family, that puts an additional 1600 people on highway 29, most
ely at peek traffic time.) Additional developmental expansions
the works in this area include Hickory Ridge, Advance Mills
lage, and Loftlands to name only a few.
At the present time, the drive to Earlysville via Rt. 743 is a
as ant one. The addition of over 256 more families would create
urdensome traffic problem.
The value of many properties, including our own would certainly
rease. We have put much hard earned money into our home hoping
t it would be an investment that would appreciate over time
her than depreciate.
With this next point, we do not want to sound like arrogant or
f-serving people. However, it is a fact that a mobile home
k, or a trailer park, is very often not aesthetically pleasing
to behold. You may look at the intersection of Rio Road and Rt.
743 to confirm this.
6) The original plan to preserve this area for agriculture and
wi dlife should remain in place. Certainly Mr. W. Wood will not
suffer financial hardship by retaining this area as originally
pI nned. We suspect that Mr. Wood never intended to leave this
ar a untouched, and his application to rezone this area confirms
this.
.
.
.
.
We understand the need to create affordable housing in Albemarle
nty and support that goal wholeheartedly. However, there are
ter ways to achieve this. It is widely known that mobile homes
"affordable" in the short term; but, over the long term, they
poor investments that NEVER appreciate nor do they add value to
surrounding area. The parks deteriorate over a very short
unt of time.
Simply put, we are vehemently OPPOSED to the rezoning of this
for a mobile home park. Please think carefully on the long
ra ge impact on this. Also, consider that, in going through with
this, you will be sacrificing the good of many for the seeming good
of a very few. Thank you for your wise and thoughtful
co sideration of our concerns.
Sincerely,
J L 1 3 1993
Lou Ives
1109 Fox Ridge
Earlysville, Virginia 22936
(804)978-1459
. Pia ning Dept.
.
e
July 10, 1993
ice of Planning and Community Development
McIntire Road
rlottesville, Virginia 22902
Re: The mobile home project south of CHO airport runway
03 and near the junction of routes 606 and 743.
In the several arguments on this project, the vital issue of
sa ety has not been addressed.
I have been active in .aviation for over 40 years in both
mi itary and general aviation.
In these years, I have seldom seen a development next to an
port that was not - eventually - the scene of an aircraft
ident.
It is one thing to have an aircraft take off from or approach
a unway, have an emergency, and fly through a farm structure.
It is another to have the same event occur where a mobile home
elopment replaces the farmhouse and the aircraft flies through
ozen mobile homes.
Most aircraft emergencies occur in three instances:
takeoff, (2) landing, and (3) weather. All will occur in
rations of aircraft at CHO, and the resultant severity of the
ident will be affected by development near the runway.
stockton, California, recognized this possibility thirty years
and created concentric agricultural and industrial zones to
imize the danger to both airborne and land-based individuals and
uctures. The boards of few other municipalities have been
ilarily enlightened.
[In the 1950's, an individual built a home south of the busy
way at Van Nuys, California. An aircraft had an engine failure
final and flew through the house. The individual sued and
vailed. ]
other than the dangers of landing and taking off aircraft near
proposed mobile home project, another vital problem is extant:
t of the safety of the airborne pilot and passengers.
When a landing or takeoff emergency occurs, the pilot first
ks ,to avoid casualties on the ground by avoiding residential
as, then looks for a landing area. If he must avoid casualties
ause of the mobile home park, he and his passemgers are left
hreduced alternatives.
Development of mobile
munity. Development of
ble factor.
e
Sandra and Fred Funke
4220 Rowan Court
EarIysvilIe, VA 22936
'ill
JJL
ED
1993
Planning Dept
Ju y 9, 1993
W Iter Johnson
D pt. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, VA 22902
Re: W. Wood's application for Mobile Home Park
at intersection of Route 606 and Route 743
in EarIysville
Ware residents of EarIysvilIe Forest and request that the Planning & Community
D velopment committee deny Mr. Wood's application to develop a mobile home park at
th intersection of 743 and 606.
. T ere is already far too much traffic on Route 743 and we are already plagued with the
no'se and pollution from the airport. Please do not force us to deal with heavier traffic,
he vier pollution, not to mention the aesthetic value of that now beautiful area that will be
10 t by development of a mobile home park, especially one of that magnitude,
E rlysvilIe Forest currently is one of the best real estate resale areas in the county. A
m bile home park in our backyard would greatly reduce our resale values.
ditionaIIy, the farm on 743 at that corner is quite beautiful with a nice view of the
untains and residential properties. There are few areas in metropolitan Charlottesville
that are still beautiful.
ase deny Mr. Wood's application for a mobile home park.
e
"
" ...
e
July 9, 1993
RECEIVED
Bill Fritz
De artment of Planning
and Community Development
Alb marle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Cha lottesville, VA 22901
JUl 1 .) 1993
Planning Dept.
Dea Mr. Fritz,
A ell planned, quiet, safe, friendly community is a rare item these days and extremely hard
to f nd. Earlysville Forest is one such place, Unfortunately, this developement and other
surr unding areas are in danger of being destroyed, While destroyed may seem harsh--it is-
app opriate. A Mobile Home Park at the juncture of 606 and 743 will be nothing but
detr ental to all residents of this area,
. Bro dus Wood Elementary School is small quiet and has a good reputation. We would like to
kee it that way. A 256 family mobile home park would place a great strain on the school's
fina cial and structural resources. We moved to Earlysville so that my two children would have
that intimate touch that so many of the larger schools seem to lack.
Earl sville Forest is a planned community. It was planned to be small, friendly, and private.
Ho long do you feel our five ponds will last when the children of these 256 families decide
to e plore the neighborhood? How private will our main roads be after these 256 families
deci e to conduct their "Sunday Drive" through our streets? And how safe will our roads be
afte these 256 families add their traffic to 606 and 743? We moved to Earlysville for the
loca ion and the rural atmosphere. Our driving time to the University of Virginia is now 20
min tes due to traffic. If just half of the 256 families have two cars, that's 256 more cars on
the oad. Thereby, effectively increasing travel time to 35-40 minutes,
And let's consider the other residents of the proposed building site. Yes, the raccoons can be
an i convenience when they visit garbage cans during the night. On the other hand, the deer
are benefit of our area and help create that country look that so many residents of our
co unity enjoy. The site is already zoned for agricultural and wildlife purposes. WHY
RU A GOOD THING?
.
.
.
.
J' .
Anti of course there is always the important issue of property values and appearances, We
moved to Earlysville Forest because it is a stable community, We did not want to wake up
eveD' morning wondering if the neighbor was going to leave junk cars in his driveway. Sure,
it's his driveway and if he wants to leave junk cars in it that's his right. But we don't want to
loa I'- at it. Therefore, we agreed to abide by a set of covenents that make you roll your eyes but
keep the neighborhood nice and the property values consistent. If looking for a new home, we
cer1lainly would be put off by the appearance of a 256 family Mobile Home Park. I firmly
bereve that Mobile Home Parks are not regulated strictly enough and in time will become
una tractive--an eyesore that everyone would have to look at everyday as they travel to and from.
wo k. For example, the mobile home parks on 743 and Rio Road near the Rock Store and the
one off of 250 East. Neither are shining examples of the Mobile Home Park at its finest.
In mmmary, I firmly believe that allowing Mr. Wood access to develope this site would have
a v ry negative impact on any community within a 20 mile radius, Why should one person's
des re to expand affect hundreds of families who are perfectly happy? In these days of noise,
confusion, violence and uncertainty, Mr. Wood's request would destroy our last defense against
the world, our home.
Sin erelY'_/0
~~ ~ ~u ~.r/ __________.
~~~tC/~S
Gar", C. Potter
Reb~cca K. Bichard
1060 Hunter's Ridge Road
Ear ysville, Va 22936
cc: David P. Bowerman
Edward H, Bain, Jr.
Charlotte Humphries
Walter Perkins
Forrest Marshall
Charles Martin
.
.. . - .' . <. ~.. .,'. ._-... .".~.,..~.._-_.~.....,~_..,,_....:-_~_.
<:/Ldy S; /993 '
M ?2d
Of/tu /; J?/r14}~ 'f OUJI,?
(0Vvn!y q;//t~ /3/ilj'
'fol J'l)~~Ii~ I<d.
Chf:)/L! orkJ oj / f..e, I uP- oz;;L 10 /
REOEIVED
JUl 0 9 1993
Planning Dept.
.
~6U1~. ~<~)
J /U'" IL-t:t0 /~ 1-0 e/~L&d-d rruj orl7-
~ Nr1dvnf tL /f'~c'<1ed /f~u ~
.?~ /'Jd1 CZ0pC'd Rd')' /Ck 7<1:{ d ~
7U;-c uI ;jILV-t17 'f' ~ rOj'/cJQd t'h7d
~ ,()I,M /70/ AI? /A..R be/-le-0nexl 5/
--tIzu tcr;;?v/7?-LN1-ity tZ-17d ,/'w.-OA rrul d .If& c'b
JZJ 7r?U.. (}L{ra~ r( ~, v0a/- h -h
'IlavL iI t1 /U4t/'u1e..jCL /.tAdd.bJv and-
~'~. ~ r~ tH2LO, tU!v{}/754>> km-
;pad-- CJ7t $ztMtituY (f)8dcl 0cA&d-/ ~
ew~ ~ ~~ /0!!2 ~aa3"
J/;d42A ff~ ft;~ 1!~-( /U CP)z4~dJ;4aUt7){A).
IrUJ, ~~~..I
(j-;rJab..tJ tOtJod ~1Z' ',..,
.
.
.
.
7/1/j3
" ~3. 1-1;1. 'iZi-
13 C'711, f"J..(
AFF PERSON:
P NING COMMISSION:
B ARD OF SUPERVISORS:
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
JULY 13, 1993
JULY 14, 1993
mu\Yl~
00
JlJl - 9 1993
-92-14 WENDELL WOOD
-93-13 UNITED LAND CORPORATION
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
-92-14 Wendell Wood - Proposal to rezone approximately 57
res from RA, Rural Areas to R-15, Residential (proffered) on
operty, described as Tax Map 32, Parcels 50, 53, 54, 55, and 56
cated on the east side of Rt. 606 approximately 0.6 miles south
Rt. 649. (The following additional parcels are affected by the
oposed road network: Tax Map 32, Parcels 44, 45, 42A, 42B,
C, 42D and 42E and Tax Map 46, Parcel 5 to remain zoned RA,
ral Areas, but with proffers). The site is in the Rivanna
gisterial District and is located in a designated growth area
ommunity of Hollyroead) recommended for High Density Residential
0.01 - 34 dwelling units per acre).
-93-13 united Land Cor oration - Proposal to establish a mobile
me park [24.2(10)] on approximately 57 acres currently zoned
, Rural Areas. (ZMA-92-14 is pending on this site). Property,
scribed as Tax Map 32, Parcels 50, 53, 54, 55 and 56, is
cated on the east side of Rt. 606 approximately 0.6 miles south
Rt. 649 in the Rivanna Magisterial District. This site is
cated in the Community of Hollyroead recommended for High
nsity Residential.
aracter of the Area: This site is wooded and slightly rolling.
e trees are a mixture of evergreen and deciduous stands. The
te is within the Airport Noise Impact Area and airport
erations are adjacent. The site has limited frontage on Route
6. The nearest dwelling to the property line is approximately
feet. One intermittent stream crosses the property.
licant's Pro osal: The applicant is proposing to rezone
proximately 57 acres and to establish a mobile home park for
6 mobile home units. Access to this site is shown on a new
blic road which intersects Route 606. All internal roads
rving the mobile homes are proposed as private roads.
creation facilities and parking for recreational vehicles are
own on the plan submitted for review. Proffers have been
bmitted (Attachment C).
MMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has reviewed these requests
r compliance with the comprehensive Plan and the purpose and
tent of the Zoning Ordinance and Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning
dinance and recommends approval of both requests.
1
.
.
.
P annina and Zonina Historv: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment
aJfecting this area was approved by the Board of Supervisors on
October 7, 1992. The land use map and recommendation adopted by
tte Board is included as Attachment D.
F SCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
At the request of the Board of Supervisors, the Planning staff
rEviews rezoning requests for their fiscal impact on public and
tlansportation facilities. This analysis is limited to those
rEzonings that have some effect on facilities that are identified
iI our Capital Improvements Program (CIP) or six Year Road Plan
aId have a cost associated with them.
Tle analysis is based on the fair share determination of a
pcrticular development's impact to affected facilities. It must
bE pointed out that this analysis is cursory, due to the lack of
iI formation on revenues and the amount attributable to this
dEvelopment. The cost outlined by staff only indicates the
p oportionate share of construction costs from the additional
dEvelopment generated by the rezoning over by-right development.
Tle following are those facilities which will be affected by the
rE zoning request and have a cost associated with them.
A Schools
S<hools affected by this proposal based on school district
b<nundaries at the time of this report which have a cost as
i< entified in the CIP are:
~ew Middle School
~lbemarle High School
$8,079,000
$2,495,000
Be sed on the additional students as estimated by multipliers
c\rrently used by the County, 81 additional elementary school
siudents (Hollyroead Elementary School), 33 additional middle
school students (New Middle School), and 37 additional high
school students (Albemarle High School) are anticipated. Costs
attributable to this development based on the proportion of
students is $410,366.00 or $1,738.83 per dwelling unit.
B Librarv
Tlis proposal is in the service area of the Northside Branch
L'brary (Project cost = $130,000). Based on the proportionate
irpact to library capacity, the proportionate share cost of this
ploject is $3,464.50 or $14.68 per dwelling unit.
2
C. Recreational Facilities
.
Recreation facilities affected by this proposal which have a cost
identified in the CIP are:
lollymead Middle School Outdoor Recreation
Iivanna Park Improvements
lollymead Elementary School Outdoor
I ecreation
$225,000
$143,144
$37,000
Based on the additional population generated by this request, the
ploportional share cost of this project is $20,900.58 or $88.56
per dwelling unit.
>Ii. ....... ............... .......................................<.............. ..... .............. ,~'1'>> ............... ....... ................ . i
I ..........>... ....... ...... ....> ....
PROPORTIONATE COST PER
ROJECTS TOTAL COST $ SHARE $ DU $
(236 DU's)
r ew Middle School 8,079,000.00 355,476.00 1,506.25
J lbemarle High School 2,495,000,00 54,890,00 232.58
. r orths ide Branch Library 130,000.00 3,464.50 14.68
arks 405,144.00 20,900.58 88.56
~OTALS 11,109,144.00 434,731. 08 1,842,07
Tte potential for redistricting this site into Broadus Wood
E~ementary exists. The capacity at that school is 497. The
articipated 1993-1994 enrollment is 393. Assuming redistricting,
tte Fiscal Impact analysis is based on a total CIP cost of
$J1,933,044.00 resulting in a proportionate share of $552,327.71
OI $2,340.37 per dwelling unit.
Ccnsideration of the fiscal impact of the development needs to be
balanced against considerations of the County's growth management
pclicy and other County policies. Excessive development
e~actions could have the effect of discouraging utilization of
tte holding capacity of Growth Areas and, thus lead to
accelerated development in the Rural Areas.
.
3
s
COMMENT:
.
1
2
3
Access
Airport Impact Area
Comprehensive Plan
S aff has identified the following major issues which must be
a dressed:
are reviewed separately.
.
e applicant is proposing a conventional "T" intersection on
ute 606 to serve this development. The Virginia Department of
ansportation (VDOT) has provided comments on this access
ttachment E). Their comments indicate that the concept of this
cess is acceptable. (Final plans will be required for the
sign of the entrance.) Route 606 is anticipated to be adequate
support the volume of traffic generated by this use. An
sement and/or right-of-way dedication from the Airport
thority may be needed to accommodate the proposed entrance.
mments from the Director of Aviation at the Airport regarding
e entrance are included as Attachment F. In part these
mments state "it is uncertain that such approval of any such
cumbrance would be granted given the fact that this land use is
t compatible with airport operations." In order for easements
right-of-way dedication to occur, approval must be obtained
om both the Airport Authority and the Federal Aviation
ministration.
H'storically, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors
h ve not entertained requests which involved off-site
i provements without evidence that those improvements could be
o tained. VDOT has not reviewed a detailed plan for the entrance
c nfiguration and staff cannot verify at this time that access
c n be achieved without impacting Airport property. (Staff will
c ntinue to review this aspect of the plan.) Should this
r zoning and special use permit be approved, the applicant is put
o notice that he accepts responsibility for obtaining permission
f r off-site improvements. Conditions on the special use permit
w'll require that any change in the entrance will require
a endment of the special use permit in order to exercise the
a lowances of the proffered rezoning.
e applicant will serve the mobile home units with private
ads. A 110 foot right-of-way is being provided for the
p oposed entrance road and would be available should a four-lane
d'vided highway connecting Route 606 and Route 29 be approved in
t e future. (This connection is not proposed at this time and
w'll be subject to review with subsequent development proposals.)
.
4
.
..
c '.
)
.
N plan has been approved for a possible Meadowcreek Parkway
a ignment for this area. The May, 1993 draft report of an
a ignment study being conducted by Sverdrup Corporation
i entifies alternatives W1 and W2 which could affect this area.
W is a north-south road parallel to Route 29 which connects to
A'rport Road. W2 is a combination of W1 and east-west connectors
t Timberwood Boulevard, Hollymead Drive North, and Route 606.
H wever, the exact location of these roadways is not established.
A'
T e proposed mobile home park lies entirely within the Airport
I pact Area Overlay District and is within the Noise Impact Area.
S aff has contacted the Airport Authority which has stated in
p rt:
"The proposed mobile home park development is located
adjacent to the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport. In
reviewing the Albemarle County Noise Overlay Area it would
appear that this development is a non-compatible land use
based on aircraft sound exposure emanating from the Airport.
Many communities across the united States have allowed the
proliferation of residential developments in close proximity
to airports only to find later on that a noise mitigation
program is necessary. Such noise mitigation programs
typically involves a very expensive and litigious process
involving fee simple acquisition of residential property,
payment of relocation/moving expenses, and numerous lawsuits
filed by residents against local governmental jurisdiction."
T e overall issue of locating a residential area within the
A'rport Impact Area was discussed during review of the CPA.
T erefore, staff views the adoption of the CPA by the Board of
S pervisors as recognizing this issue and finding the use to be
a ceptable within the Airport Impact Area. All mobile homes
w ich propose to locate in the park must satisfy the associated
p rformance standards of section 30.2.5 of the Zoning Ordinance.
S aff notes that no relief from this ordinance provisions exists.
( s of this writing, staff has not been provided information
e tablishing whether or not any mobile home units will meet the
a oustical performance standards.) Comment from the Inspections
D partment is included as Attachment G. Staff has included a
g aph taken from the Airport Master Plan indicating the aircraft
a noyance anticipated in this development (Attachment H) .
C rehensive Plan
T full text, and map of the Comprehensive Plan recommendations
f Hollymead are included as Attachment D.
5
.
.
.
S1aff op1n10n is that the mobile home park is sUbstantially in
ccmpliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Buffers from adjacent
ploperties have not been adequately provided. As a condition of
alproval, staff recommends deletion of any lot encroachment
w thin 50 feet of adjacent properties. This setback will be
ccnsistent with the Comprehensive Plan recommendation and Section
5 3.5.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. The stream valleys adjacent to
tle mobile home park are not be disturbed. One stream valley
lc~cated on-site will be utilized for recreation area. This
siream is intermittent and should not interfere with recreational
activities.
Tle applicant has provided proffers binding this site to usage
fer a mobile home park for a period of not less than fifteen (15)
YEars.
SlrMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
S aff has identified the following factors which are favorable to
tl is request:
1 The area proposed for development is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
2 The nature of the use, mobile home park, is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan.
3
A mobile home park may provide increased affordable housing
stock. Several studies of mobile home issues identify a
need for 250 replacement units for mobile homes due to
mobile home park closures, potential closures or reduction
in park size.
Siaff'has identified the following factors which are unfavorable
t(~ this request:
1 Access to Route 606 appears to affect property owned by the
Airport Authority. The Airport Authority has not indicated
that the necessary easements or right-of-way will be
granted.
2 No information has been submitted indicating that mobile
homes satisfy the acoustical performance standards of
Section 30.2.5 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Tl~e most significant unresolved issue is access (availability of
r ght-of-way/easements for the entrance). Ideally, these issues
a e resolved prior to public hearing. At this time, the
al~plicant has not resolved this issue with Virginia Department of
T~ansportation or the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport
Al~thority. However, conditions in the special use permit have
bE~en provided to address this issue. Should the Planning
6
.
.~
.
ccmmission and Board of Supervisors believe this issue has been
adequately addressed by conditions, staff believes that the
favorable factors warrant approval of the rezoning and special
use permit with acceptance of relevant proffers listed below.
1. The mobile home park is proffered for a period of not less
than 15 years from the start of development in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan. The start of development is
defined as the date the first building permit is issued.
2. The frontage of Route 29 containing Tax Map 32, Parcels 43A,
43, 42E, 42D, 42B, 42C, 42A and Tax Map 46, Parcel 5 shall
contain not more than three entrances. The County may
require closure of any existing entrances at the time of
establishment of any new entrance such that the total number
of entrances does not exceed three.
3. An access road between the mobile home sales area and mobile
home park shall be developed at the time of establishment of
the mobile home sales use. This access road shall be used
only for the movement of mobile homes between the two uses
and for emergency access.
Stould the Board of Supervisors choose to approve SP-93-13, staff
recommends the following conditions:
R~COMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1.
Deletion/relocation of all lots within 50 feet of an
adjacent parcel;
2. Staff approval of final site plan;
3. Staff approval of all mobile home units proposed for
location within the mobile home park to ensure compliance
with the acoustical performance standards of Section 30.2.5;
4. Staff approval of private road maintenance agreements;
5. Maintenance of recreation facilities shall be the
responsibility of the property owner in accord with Section
4.16.3.2;
6. No direct connection to Route 29 shall be made without
amendment of this permit;
7. provision of a conventional "T" intersection with Route 606
constructed in accordance with Virginia Department of
Transportation requirements. Access is shown on a plan
initialled WDF dated 7/8/93;
7
.
-
.
8. No plan of development shall be submitted for review until
the necessary easements and/or right-of-way acquisition for
the Route 606 entrance have been obtained.
----------------
A~TACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Applicant's Proffers
D - Comprehensive Plan Recommendations for Hollyroead
E - Virginia Department of Transportation Comment
F - Airport Authority Comment
G - Inspections Department Comment
H - Airport Annoyance Graph
I - Letters from the Public
8
~ _/
'"
~
~~
I ~
~ '~)
.~ .0 \ ' ',' ~~-r '-::;-
-;~~<f
, '
.'
-------.
----
AI
....,J -;.
" ~-
2~'~;:-'
l ,'.~; :,
':,'\:.
\~"'''."..
I .... '.'
) .....-~. \
'&\,' ~r: \\"
I.\~...: ~\. S"',.'..'~,
:i...,.~~,.~
'I' I ",~",,~,' .'
;/ ~l" :'" /"
ZMA-92 't .,;\..i:~\~
Wendell Wx>d
\ ~~~~~/~_."" .r,;i : j
-''is: }='-':~ ..
''';;'~:.... ;"" /" ~~ .,'~'~ : ~~\:.. \
.:\"':;; ~<>c' .. ~,,;,~..t,--....~...._~ ~~f---d "". () /.
.' """,_ _.-,,-~r" : - l' ", '
~" .' ~_~) ,'" ~ ' - In'' I
, .' ,...... ~~-~ '\..
...". c: ~;'~l -. :~' '"~--\ ' ~ .~/' ^ ..
-or ."'" .. 'W' / -I . I /,y .
',_ '~:-.'.;L'_"".'...'L_'_;'."';--:.'''''''' .".. \ u" ~~' ~,' ~,:.' 1/ '\>> .",:"",. . ~. ,?" [c;-;:
--;;_'~~. ,_,,-,--e'~ '.: - '. ..",.- , ,,,.,,,"--,
',.." _,,:',,'C ,-"-""';' ,- . . , ,'. · ,- :'
'.. .'.'" I Jr?"~' ,.,.~,), ?r/.' "'~,~'
~_."< .. .......'.. ~t f~~j ,
._~~>)'-!---;;s T;"/'~"-. '
r" .~ " hi<d ;,:,;;:;;,....::.~,~~- . ~,-CS ""!;;'L,
~ A ... /I._".)~.'v-"j~".--C-?~~~
, . '\ ? J.f '''''''''~'''' : "'I... ".: .^'~"
ce" ..>~ ,..,._,,~,,;;;;::. /,,'ht.,: -'I! 0'~o>> ~~
.' i.,i. ," "', '" "
." 7:2J,,: :';, ,....c-. . c. //.' ,.cc. "'f''' __, c'" '~" '. -". b{
'1c./,. .~ ~",:,.",~.'~' '.,1"" ,,\ ...c.e"t., ,,')', .".1/
, ; ,,/ '. ,'~' (" .~A~:::~~"
~. ,~ C' ," ~,,' r~' ,,' Q"I
t....'.. "S),,~~:=-jJ?:" --\'>/ ...../'r ;/ -\"\~"~ ..C" / /
! .../..... ~y\.. ..~".~ ,) ,\
p.. .., ' :: "i "c~ __'",,;' __ 2';\. .... - ' ..,,' () ">...... l'" /-"-1-.
_ . ,~ I... \., c.c......... ..)' ~ . .... Y> "~ "'-- ," .-'?.. :'"
..:/-../':C(~"" ,,' /
''''''J7.;' ,~ .~ '::, ' /,';'l., / / ., ..
i j ;' .'>., I - ",' cC .\~L~ () 0
,} ;' , )-1 C'c
. . 'f'
/.,...
".:~ \\
..,.,
-, -.'----:- .: ",.
.....
I
f u..: ~.~,-'l.;": ,.;:.
;,
/
I
J
I
I
I
\
0''\
;"..-.\,
I
,
\ ,,0 ~__ '
, '., ~,.,' ,"," ,,~~)-O::,~;'0~ ,<]
",-- - j.,.;~.-'.'":.. -- '
, ,c"...1~..' .. : - -, ..
,-~43~' \: " :
....... Hail
----
rE:.~'
"'~
':(\,
\~
- "I'
I
.' 0;;'
i
,:~ .' \ .
\
ro"\'
, ,
"-
...
<.
oJ
~..
G
, ,i.. F"','
, c-" '\. ~t\..
.,......-:~'< ,-~~
, ,.
1
".
,';
..".-"
l 7u~
(
,.'
';
..,(;-z:
I
I
.:/ )
/@ \
r<-, ~ S~
. . \
\,
I
,
~v
. ~~."
1":'..~;:. )~
_ _ . 'R'-;>'
./ ......'_ ....r"r-~
'~r iBJ
~ ........
,
,
t.
-S~-:~-~--
J1' ....
\ ~..,../
\
I
I
G
-~~~. -.
~-.:.- -'~---!
)IA '>,--4__
~~- -=-
..~~
---- -
. ----,---
,
)
"\
f--- _
'"- .t.
8
~.
~-
y' -
IATTACHMENT 8/
.
,=:=,-... . ...........
.
.
48
- ..
- -
jf'/ /
- -
- -
- -
/~/ ...
If--
!i~
'.-
:-
l~.~>
ZMA-93-06
United Land Corp.
2
23
ZMA-92-14
Wendell Vbod
r--.......
.
~
.
IATTACHMENT Cl
.1'1. u n cas t: C~ r
E: 1'1 q i n c" e r j 1'1 9 8< i
Corn p u i: e r.
AppJ,jcai:jons
.. h_.................. ......... ... n' ._._.... . .,..
338 Rio Road
Charla tesviJle, VA 22901
04-978-7879
REOEIVED
J U :l',' f, , 1 '::: ':' ::::
JUL 0 7 1993
1'1;-- l-Jillia.m D. Fi'- i t;z. SenJ.I:"'~ F'lanroF,'
I~Et 2xtmEnt C'-f r',lc,\nnlnC' ;:: COfflffjLuij-t:V Dp\/ic,lor'iilcn-;:
Al emayle Count v
Planning Dept.
l'lc:]rll:iye F:CtEtcj
T lottesville. "hrqj ni.::., 22'j'Jl
F.:c~:. t.ir"L.C.!"i't. J':,cfbilE' iiC)iiiL F'i~::~'I-'i:: (Zf'(if\- _1~~~?_ 14~ Zf'rlf\.,':-:j-::~- {)t-:=:,)
~- I'k. F'c'i tz~
i e,llol,xing pi' of'; ,',r _' ~'.upi.~r ';:;E'oe <:.\1.1 I_n-(:'\/ic}L';::: pi"of'fel"s ano dn::'
clf1 e'(ed in "r-eg2.io'U tl:' t!--ii.=:. "{'2zc1r-.irit;1 i--ec~Lle.=.t:
J.& T~'iE' fflc.Ldle r-.CHhe r~r:;':'k ~i~.~ r){,(~.,j-iE'.r~E'Li -i(t'i" ;~. rit=,1-jc1ci c:.j
n()t:
, --,.~~.-
......:-:-:..,:.:...
t:t--iari i ~l y'e"~ [4 s:" t ';. ()(n l" r it::' ".=. t -=1. 'r". t
l..!d:l; thE Ce'illprT.f IEn:::::} \.f' i'lE.r..
eje:::c.l.r1ecl 2.'= ti-,e d.;;<.t.,? the firs.t
01 deVEIC'Dffient ir~ aCCI~ydar11:e
TilE ::,'t.E'-'\: 01 OEVElopflIE:nt: -
bu.ilding pc:;;--mi t ~_ issued.
....
-ri.JE' iu()bilE:: t'JI~)lllE:- sa,lE':--=: :tc.\: LV::=.f.:' !~}ii.1 bE? ilH;J~\:E~d ,.~_J fh()tlile l"i()f(JE<
:=',=-.les ar,,=! the ,'?:',,:is, t ing 91" ()C e1")/ s to'(' e:3.nd C2.':=..ollne ~;"".le'=:..
-f hE i1lobj h- he.jjlc ~>_':.:i.t~~:; 10'( ent r arice ~)ill bE clo~"E'[,.i (ir- i.tl t,PiE:'C
.i.i '[-'::::-quir-ecJ t::~ .tt-,.::, futur-e pi.an OT de.,..(;:;loDment fOrtl,...'e
(- eHli.:tlrllf1Cl iJ.r' f:.: i:.; desi on~i tf=C~ c!f"f ic E.' ariD ..,.." eoi c~r iL-:.l ~jt~.j4' vie E' i ri .(:;-IL
C:c'rnpr-et.'en=:.i..../e F'ldf':..
TI-\f..::- .tr()r"~ti:tge (.In r.:()l~t.L~ -......:...: C()li-L.c~il.drf~) ii::
43~ 42Ef 42[\ 42[:, <2C:, 42A::mcJ T 3:.; !"l,3.iJ
c. CtJ.d. c\:t'.1 r-lcd-. Hic,r L' -t l')c;:.n i. tV;"- f~E: Eni: .~- L:.nc L =.~
--..-.
~J"::',
F' c..,j- CE~J!;:'.
~'.:f ~~!::!..
i".Ic.t~)
4C:. Paxe.?l 5 shall
Tt"lL. C:(lt_~r~ii:~y illc:'~.'"
jrequi"(e ch)sur'~ .:.; ,:;it-i} e:',c:i<:::.ting ent"r-arl':es at the time (Jf
E:'~:.tt.:;;..t~li~=:,t-ifr,E~nt. ci-f C:~Ti:':" r it,:",le} -='I-i1.:r c.l.J-lCF' !:'-:,j:::i"' th-:-:;.t -f..l'tE.l tc,ti_tl rlt.~Hlt-tEr
ell I:ntr- c\I lC e':::. clcll=.~:::. n;:d:~ e~<(~ eed t~l~- ::?l=,
5 ll-'E' SJ-{.e r.1i:'tr-j -, c..r i....E- n,c.l:Jilc:?' 1-}()fitE' '::-~D.lt:;~:. led: ~\lill fi()t be
stgned until the '::,itE' plan fc....- a minimum of 100 mobile hom!-=
II.n1';:::;. is siqnf-'!ci,
[. (':In i:.:;.c.c.c~::~:--~. 1"' cracl ['iE't:J~.iE'E'n i:l-lE illc~ttilt:: hC~lnt:: .~i3.1f::'::: cU--E'cl Edid t:~-IE
mc,.bil:::? home pz:,'d:
P~. -;: C';.tJli ~;hfflE'n1:: .:.-r
':=,1'1211 be used 0,,]
5i--.2<.11 bi? cJe\/elcl[)...?o Ei,t:
"tr-,r-:' tiITI!? elf
the HIObilc hOiflfo "'.c..1c",-,
L'.~-,:.C,. 1111:'-:'. ~\CCE'==,= r CL::..U
IlIc:.Ljile homes be t. '.J',?2I',
1 (':'1.:-
~_~}-Ie fftC)\-'e.nerlt Cti
T-r-it.? -t:\.f() Lt~-E~-:- ~':T.'L': 'f (-!i;. ~.. iitF'1".iJt.?r-iC'.,,,,: .S.CCE.:.'=.:::.:...
Sir-Ie f'?( .~]
~;,~ - . .....-. --
t.,l,.. -j t't;."ljiic' ___ ~~llq"!(" t i.: ~.f J.~ ~
i .,'-_,
(,on,
}:~ e 'i :i_ s c cl l 0 - ~ - ;-; ')
.
.
H 0 L T J.'1iEAD
LOG. T101\
The c~s~cr~ bou~d2ry of t~c
CO~~UIlity is ~hc ~atur~l stream
bou.dary of Powell Creek and its
tri' c:~tci4di:lg froIn Route
643 on the SOu t:l to P....cu t2 649
CPr ffit Roa~). :hc nGrther~
bou~dary follows Ro~te 649, ROute 29
Nor h, and a strea~ swale leading to
e 606. The western boundary o~
COlnnlun i:.:y f 01 low' s t~1C a:!.. ig11:ner:::
oute 606 to ~he Cha~:lottesville-
marle Air?ort ~{here it goes wcs:
and south nround tl~c iiirpo~t to
ROll e 743, followi11g Route 743 to
Rou e 643 ancl thc:~ 11endi~g e~st t~
Rot.: e 29 No,,-th,
E):r
rp .,..;-,,,"; ,"""
J.":"J..\\,,)
L\i\D USE
Re.sider:.ti2..2.. - l-lollyr:lcad
con ains an esti~ated (1985) 82G
dwellinG units and approximatcl)'
2,2 0 persons, Ove~ 60 perCcI~t uf
the total d~clling u~its in
llol'ymead arc si~g12-~amily ~e:~cl~cd
uni s. 711C !-iollY~2ad Ccmm~~i~y ~lsc
inc'udes t~0 13~;e mob~lc 110me
par s, total~ing a?proxi~acely 230
ur~l s.
A~ cstima:cd 7 percc~t or
the tocal ho~sing stock was
con tructcd (l~~~~~ the precedi~G
fiv YC<1:':-s,
CGIT~"7l.ercial and Off:..ce - Tl-~ei:"c
e..,
.........
t a \7arie:ty of COITJTtercial rc:t~i.ll
.J...u Hollyrneud ~otallin8 in
55 of 7S0,COC s~ua~e =C2t of
r arC3. Most of t11cse ~scs ar(~
way oric11:ed ~at~er tha~ for
l1b 0 r1....00 d shcp"!) i n8 ' COill!ne rc i (:1:
C2 uses ~otal obo~t 19,000
re feet of building area.
I~dus~riul - There exis:
use
exc
flo
<lpp~oxim0.~c
l.n 1ol1:,Tjiicad.
inc ude over
flo r arec"
t~..:clve industriz:l '<-:505
-=.' 0 G C :: 11 e ~-, ~ l-: c \"
111,000 squnl~c fee: of
o ::he. r Land :J.s 8 S
1 rJ. L:
Hol ymca.o Co:r:':11u:;.i_t~~/ cOl~tai:i.s ~\../o
...
'ATTACHMENT D I
...
..
c~1urchcs I an cJ...e:T:ent3.~Y SCtl00J_, a
:argc cemetary, and tl1e
Charlottesvi:le-Albemarle Airport,
ENVIROi'l:-iENTA"i..., CLAR1\CTLRISTICS
The area is divided into two
major watersheds by a ridgeline
run~ing along Rot.:te 649. Land to
the south of the ridge line d=ains
into the Powell Creek system which
leads eventually to the South Fork
of the Riv~:~n2. ~and co t112 110rth
of the rid~e lin~ drains nortl1ward
into the North Fork of the Rivanna,
The
entire
consists
of
area
soi:s in tl~e Elio3k-H~zel-Glc11elg
^ssociat~on. T~:is associction is
limited for develop~ent because of
moderately permeable subsoil, the
cl~yey s~bsoill and the shallow
c:2ptb to bedrock,
~os: of the area 15 forested
with the exception of developed
~ire~s near t110 i~~crsection of Route
29 Korth a~d Route 649, the
:lo1_1ymcad prope~-ty J ar~d SOI;'tC :)"pe~
f2rmland il-l tll~ no~thwcst section.
PUBLIC ~ATER AND SE~ER
SC\""'c r
service lS available
through the
Powcl~ Creek interceptor
to :hc S 0',-1 th cJ. nd t.::c CCdTle 10 ~
Treatment system to the north based
on ~atural d~ninagc, ~atcr service
is nvai13blc south of Route 649 from
the So~:t:, R1V,,~n.'i systcr;: one', no:-th
cf l{ol~te 649 f~oln the Kor~h Rivanna
S '/ S tern .
TilC~C ~s en i~tcrconn~ct of
t~c twe systcr::s w~:ic~ ~lilS no~ be~n
ope:lcd.
.
,
.
ROADS
Route 2g ~s co~gcs:ed a~c
acce~s has been l~mite~ for
deve opn1ent pu~poses.
RECO iliENDA'l'IONS
o
No co:~~me~cial us~s a~e to be
es~ablished on ci~he~ side of
Route 29 up to the entrance 0:'
the existing Hollymead
Sub d i vis ion . .:r-t.~'-h-e-----H~-L~tt
():: the-~' IG=-~TCH:--t-J.'1~_~
-r-e i;':'C"lnH-tt5-e C'.r.::; c.~t
R-i-",..a-m~c. Ki-:.:::.- :-.ot c;~::cr.G n~
&f-.-t.t i C r >.. C: :'=-B-Fl-,,+" C .::; .:1 s t G-J:'
\,' cst :ri_4..~&tl-8:: 2 9 .
Scr..-icc c..rG-tlc .:1S sLc-,,-n 0:: :J-,G
P 1.:1 n C'. r .::; S'-.\ f:: .:.. c-:i.-e-Fl-t-i~i=x
fOrC'5-et-""':l':Jlc f~t::...;.r.:: ,
o
The area between t11c scu~11crn
bo~n~a~y of Rou~c 643 an~ t11c
Sou~h ?ork of the Riva~~a
River is to ~cma~~ in an opell
state
a b~ffcr bCtwe8D the
Urban A~en and the Com~unity
of Hollymead. :his boundary
is critical as it prescrv~s
the dist.:..nct identity of the
COlmnuni ty from the Urban ,".rea
and prevents co~tinuous
development fro~ ~he Ci:j o~
Charlottesville along Route 29
~orth to the North Fork of tl1c
Rlva~na. This area is
included i~ the Rivanna River
Greenway corritor and provid~s
an oppo~~unity fo~ pnss:vc
rec~e0tional ~scs.
o
Preserve the st~8affi valleys
and their tributary drainage-
way, plus adjacent areas of
steeply sloping terrain, as an
open space network. This
network is designed to tic
into future residential
development areas in
Hollyrnead.
o Provide new landscapi~~ ~icl1
\ ATTACHMENT 0 II Page 2\
dcvclopmc~t a~ong Route 29
r'~ 0 r t h .
o TllC area west of Rou~e 29
~orth is i~tended for
industri~l and office uses
a large employment area,
as
It
is expected that these uses
will be of a large scale and
have a significant airpcrt
oriente. tion, E::ic tirrg
'h~.JeHt--H.t-l--a~€ \18 s t
~:.c---&-f---R.t+~ 8 2 9 t; 0 r t l~~
~~~oGni~~c, but a~2 not
-~-d8d to Gl;p.:1nd C:~CC,;)t 'for
fl++-U-RB~€..1B-'p c d are Cl 0 fIne d i '..;.m
,j{~.H..7-no-t-'-'-l't----B-f Cc dar Hill
:r'-i-cil.::i.- ?C'!r;;, The Office
Service area consists of
approximately 25 acres &long
Airport Road and 40 acres west
of the Regional Service area
on the west side of Route 29N,
The balance of the employment
generating area is Indus~rial
Sc:--vice.
c
Establish a regional service
area on Route 29 North at
Rou:e 649. This area is
i"tended to serve corrulle;~cial
service nee~s for the
~iollYinead Community, the
airpo~tl and Route 29 North
:raffic. This location is
expected to acco~~odate
~L:ltiple uses for f~tur2
CO:Tlmc rc ia 1 cleve lapment
co~vc~:ieI~t to a variety of
1J.se::-s.
o
ES:51)J.ish 2 re~lO~~l serVlce
"rea of appro~imately 50 acres
on the west side of Route 29
~~ortl1 ~o accomrroda:e ffiultiple
uses for :uture COIT~e~Cial
d2velopmcnt convenic~t to a
variety of users,
h.ccess to
tl1is area should be limi~ed ~o
t:,ree locations on Route 29,
Development of the entire
.
\
.i
.
commercial area shall be
pursuant to an overall plan of
development. Zoning action
and development of this area
consistent with this
Comprehensive Plan sh~ll occur
aft~r tt.:.e de:velopmer.lt of the
high dcnsity residential arca
(to a mLminum of 100 mobile
home sites as noted in the
recommendation for the
development of this
residc~tial area).
o
Es t2.b 1 i::; 1: ;:~ C OT:'.:;':\.lI""1 i ty s c r"',; i c c~
a::- e cJ. S (; U ~:-; G f L'~ 0 ',-1 t c G 4 9 011 :::-: c
east s~de o~ R00tC 29 t~O~t11 ~c
p~ovi~c 8cGc~al rctnil nccc~s
ill thc~ COl~:n~:~ity and t~1C
no~:~c~:1 p5~: o~ the CO~~:)'.
o
Es~~~)lis11 n cOln::1~ni:y sc~\ricc
a~en cc:~:crcd around t11c
en:~ancc to t~e ~iollyrne~d
Subdivi5io~. This recog~~=cs
the apl)rOvC~ co~~e~cial 3~cn
::"'. ::':iC llcllY;:'lcacl rUD. T..Jhile:
too lnr[e to be a neighbo~~oQ~
scrv:.cc ~:'-~;a, t::.c sC21e of
. ~.... .
CC~iIerClai Ge~.Tc~opmc~t lS
be in k2Cpi:1g with el1c
residc~t~~l ~~c~re of :~~e
Ho 1 ~.Y::lc[id sul~,d=- \':s iO:1 Z'..r.d
or i (; :-. ~ ~; c~ ~~ 8 :.: t-: c S l:'J C i \,T i s i. c;:-:
rc:.i::::hcr the:: hig:;,~.,.:o.~/ eses. TLc
a~ca is in~cndcd to !nee: ~occl
c onve :'~~... e ~iC c
s hopp i n[, ol1c;
profcssion31 service needs an~
is to be sc~:ccncd and bU~~2~C~
fro::: J~j~cc~: rcsidcIltii~l
3:::e:.:..5.
~ccc~s to 1-1igll dc~si~~'
Ycsidc:--.tiDl .J.rc~.:.s to tl~2 no::L.}-~
a~d SOl:::~ is to be rcscrv~d.
o
Est2bli~h a ne~ghbor11ooJ
S8rv:~c ~~c~ O~ Route 649 l~
the ~; J :: t ~~ ,2 r:: ? 0 :- t i 0 II 0 f L. h c;
Corr;:Tl~l~j,::':Y illtcndec..:. ~o l:lCc:t
local COllvenicnce S110pp~:lg C~(:
professioI1al service needs,
including medical and
fin~nci~l s2rvices.
o A~cas c~ mcdi~:~ end i11gn
I ATTACHMENT 0 ll,page 3\
dCllsitv rcsicicnti21 are 1:0 be
located iI1tcr~ally e~s~ of
Route 29 ~orch. They are
lococe~ so as Co access the
i~cernol rOod system and
s!~ou~d no~ have clircct access
~o Rou~~ 29 ~o~th.
T11c :~lcdiu..'11
density area adjacent to the
Ridgewood Mobile Home Park is
envisioned as a possible
CXDnrlS10~ area fo= the park.
o
Establish a high deusity
residcntial area of
approximately 50 acres ',:es t of
?outc 29 for the Joc3tion of a
~obile home nnrk accomodaiing
a minLmum of 100 mobile home
sites, This arca is intended
to provide affordablc housing
for Albemarle County low and
moderate income persons.
Consideration should be given
to cooperating with and
utilizing the assistance of
area human servicc agencies in
providing support services to
these residents. This area is
intcndec to be exclusively for
the location of a mobile home
park for a period of not less
than 15 year from start of
development. Because of its
?ro~imity to areas desi~7.at~d
for co=crcial and industrial
usc, dcvelopment shall provide
an effective vegetative buffer
around this area.
o
P~b~ic fnc~l~ty sites il1clude:
-A large are~ 110rtlleast of the
Rc~te 29 Nort11/Route 643
in~c~scction. Th~s is
ir:tendcd ~o be ~ctaincd for
p~ssivc ~ccreation and
grccnspace and recognizes a
s~tc identified by the state
as having possible historical
a~ld arcllcologicnl
5 ignificancc. Should tl-'le
County not acquire this
proper~y, the exist~~g zoning
.
.~
.
( p _ c
.. ~
sllall appl)r, ~ith highe~
dens t): not to c>:ceed four
d~lclling units per ac~e
possible with presc~vation of
tl1e histo~ic site, mnintc~ance
o~ greenspace end screeni~;
f~ol:~ Rou te 29.
- :'hc Eo 2-], )~:rIC c..d S C.1-l0 0 ~ cJ. re a to
provide for expanded active
recreatio~~l uses 2nd ~utu~c
school expansio~.
- T I1 e C h~;. r ::.. v :: :.= c .s 'V j. :1..1 c - ......l :) C 1:1 a ~~ 1 c
Airport, ~11~ch includes the
ex i s tin g f 0. C i 1 ~ tic s, L. ~l c
souther:1 ru~;~nj 3pprcacl~ zone
and ;~rC~iS cast of Route GC6
o~~ed b)' ~11C airport for
fU:U~8 c):p&nsion and lccn:ion
of &irport related sc~viccs.
o
Develop~ent p~~ns ~lGr;g Ro~tc
29 ~~orth a~e to be scnsit~ve
to its status 2S an entry
cJr::-i':~cr ::0 ~1-:2 :::crrl~:-lunity ar.c
L:he Urban /'-...rC2.
o
:~a~s?c):ta~:Gn i~~rovc~cnts
i.:~cl'-..:6e:
-Limi~c~~O:1 cf 22cess !)O~11tS
O~ Route 29 North :0 join:
e~~r2!~CCS) frGn~a;2 roads, ~~d
sic c: s t 1~ C c t s .
-DcvcJ_cprl:ent of the ~lcadcw
C~eek P3~~way n~d associated
collccto~ ~G3ds ~o prc:vide
l~c~e (~i~C2: ~cccss
~ ~--, '"
U~~an ~\:ca a~~ ~owntow~
Charlc~t~sville.
fl>; i th :- ~ n,-ll
~~ig~nc~t ~e:er:~i~2tio~1
r~g}~t-o~-~~y shotlld je
rese~vcd for tl1cSC rends.
-~;"1 i g:11LQ r-; t : mp r O\,rc:::e:!. ~s ~:~ d
~~del1j_:1= of Airp~r~ Read fro:~
i :: s i -:''-1 t: c r see t :. 0 n ~\; i. : 1"1 R 0 U ~.= ~ 2 \)
No~th ~o the ~ir?()~~,
j\ C C C S S
. . "
to ~~:-:lS l:"JZ:..C sr.o':':"c
DC;
~1.::: c 0 1~1~) 1 ~ S ~1 (: d
~c'.~::t
c:-::::::a:l.C(;S I :::.-.Ji:....t\~~[c
s ic~c; S ::1-CC.:::'5"
rCiZ:.csl
DI-.C
I ATTACHMENT -EJ \page 4\
-The following crossove~~~ (see
l'~3p 20 Eor nu:nber ond
location) are to be closed to
maintni~ the desirable
function and safety on Route
~9 ~orth.
Crossover 1. This crossover
serves as a U-turn device for
i'Zou te 6:13.
Crossover 2. This crossover
se~vcs c~~y U-~~rns 2nc ~as
ina~8quatc sight distance on
southbound lanes.
Cr.-ossovcr 3. (llollymcad
soutl1crn entrance) This
crossovc~ has inndequ&tc sight
dis:3~CC on the southbound
1"'-d1cs"
Crossover 4. This crossover
serves U-tt~r~s and has
inade~uate sight dista~ce.
Crossover 5, This crossover
sc~ves U-t~~rns and has
inadcCluatc sight dist~~C2.
Crossover 6. This crossover
~oo close to the Route 649
i:1tcrscction. It se~ves ~-
turns and has poor sight
distn~c~ O~ the sou:hbound
lz.. :; c s "
C~OSSOve~ 7. This cross~ve~
scr~~cs ~-turns and has
~G2dequatc s~gtt ~istance.
Crosscve= 8. This crosso':er
prcsc~tly scr'lCS a commercial
cI-:::c~pri_.sc I bu:= should be
c.losed ::0 pro"\lide d~sirable
spnc~~~ and s~ght dist2tlce.
()
~J~C~ 8:1d ~;C~l(:r i~p~cve~lcnts
::~::: ~ \l~(: :
-S:~:e~sion of t~~e Po~e:l Creek
S~wer :nte~ceptcY and
dcvclopmeIl~ o~ nccc5s~~~r
ccllection ~incs to
acco~:::od~te devclop~en: l~ ~hc
~2l~~C 29 North/Airpor~ ~Zoad
3:-(2) ~hc a::"rpor::, (l:1d
:-; c; 1- t ~J C :::l l- e sid C:l. t i 31 iJ.~: c 2. S 0 f
}-~cl:~rmca~ along Route 6i+9.
- .:.._/):-;.~ :- 2.LgC
. .
]. :1 C c: ~ c C ~i :-:. C: c: "= =- 0 L
cf
.
~,
.
the Cnl11clot sewer SystClTI witl,
the Po\~ell Creek I:1tcrCC1)tor
\.rhile expans io:J. of ::he Cal7.e 10 t.
Sewage Treatrnent Plan to
300,000 GPD capaci:y ~ill meet
short-term needs, i~ the l011~
ter~ t11is i:1~C~CO~:1cc~ion ~~~ll
be ~CCcss~~\r to mee: ultii~ate
devclo?nle~t requi~emcnts
This C3TI QC aCCOtllplishcd ~ith
il pUD1p:l1g station at Ca!nclot
anc '-~ :c~ce 1..C..I.,.d b.:.ck ::'0 ~:1C
Powell Creek interceptor
Tilni~~ and details for t~1is
i11:crconncction shol:ld be
adc::cssc.c .......
~ )-,~. .,...... -1 1 i ~- ~ n .......
l..-J,.\"'; \........................ '-.............J
~TI3stc:r plz..:-:.
-/~nul~:zc ~h.c 101.g- tcr:1: \.,:atc;..-
sl..:pply capabilities of ~;iC
North K:vanna sys~ec ~11d
cv~l~atc tl"1C ~ncc~co~r1ectio~
of ~11is systc:n ~o t~~c So~t11
Ri V3:-:.nZi sys teiT. ~n t.hc
~tilitics mastc~ p~2:~
II
Ii
j!
"
if--
;i K sidc:r.:i;1~-l..O'....7
II ? siGc:;~icL,->!(;di"'j,::1
R siclcr.~i3::"-H~3h
Ii
i'
II
.] N
II
II C
~ ,
Ii
I:
Ii
p
il
II
II
RZSID~~TIAL SUBTOT~L
iGhbo:-he,ed Service
rnm:..l!1 i ~~l' S c r"",! ice
R glo~~l S8~vice
T hcL.:s ~:.-i~;.l SC::-'\Jice
c _ i~.-:)
S C J: '/ i ': (~
P'~blic
NON - RES IDENTI.:.\.L
c:"TTD rp0,":,' !I "7
...... v0...V ..._...._.J
U"~;)E'iELOPED TO'I'!~L
" l ,
uevc...opOJ~,_
t.c.:-eagc
~. -: C) 2
58
230
., " r
-r--hf
lSO
""" ---,
-N-f-
1007
10
-, (
.J
.;..;
r 'i,~
~H_-""..1
!-j 0 0
65
" C'
.r:..--=:-
7 ';
,,-
e-B 7 D )
IATTACHMENTD'lIPage 5\
587-234.3
i 922-2300
I ;400 23C'rG
i
I
I
200"
/
..., I I '"
~ ;.j
~
UJ
D-v:el.li"g
'L:r.i ts
1900-3BOO
3409-8L,48
.1
Ii
II
!!
Ii
Ii
I!
I
I
I
I
ii
il
Ii
II
!i
'I
I
il
I,
I'
II
,I
Ii
I:
il
Ii
I,
11
.
J\ "
~;~
" ~!~J-/
/ /
(
...
/
~
.I
./
,r-
. 'j'1
''-.
- '''-.. --/
Cl
\
"'-. f" '-,
''-..-,
'-"'-'''--"
y
Community of Hollymcad
/'
\
;;
/
/~"- .
0-
.).J'
'---'6
\
\
(}G
"
/
. . /
:"'1'
j,
(
/
r
"
(
----
'11 for:
I\. n.l fj,,,::r
, , ~.. ," l <C,1 I' 11:'- \
~; ! :-:: \' I :: [
'.,:,r' ~. Y~.':I (
;.,', T Y :, ~ ,. '': 1:-: r::
;!',\(,
;.;.:1
rJ, : (.11 i'.::--.'~ flU:: :.J s;:" \.' I '.:c
~... ;'r,C'!'O~;L:) f\ "L'
!..','r:(...!,'.....l..
\'IL~_,\'~L ~,~'E\'iC[
.
..:1-....1.,\(.: U.'Jl" ::;, R
" :;:;~~-~
r:,[:-.:[!!":;,-;-i;,i...
;1 f,O/,
l:[.';';: r', J,i~SIDLt;TI,\L
- - T;;:;,:. :;~.11 ~,', I( .
,..:....
~:.::.::.::: '.lil';:,:',' [;, ;;.~t. Y r:::::::,I:'[I~TrAI_
,'_ ~ Hle,' J['~~.. Rt:S:OlW;-I;\L
rffif.1
~~]f"_:"'_:'-::':"~: '"!I!:',LIC-
~'~_}~ l'I:I\'~I~:,I"" or \'liiCI~:!/,
~ftE 1,:1 :.11(:',',..:.
";?
"';'yj; "
!. ~o tJ ~; .. I" I r,".
:.1 hi /,'.:".
lOC":')
:'(li\}Ji.
/ /1/
...
...
I
I
r
//
';
/,
V--
J
--l
-"=~
1\ \/~
'-'.'\ f '
;1 _". ..I............
,I J /
\\J"
\.\,
/~\
f \\
,/
j
;I
1\
"~
tl
'"
"-:~
\
I
A
>~~-
::,
"
/-
--.}.,,>
,'"
-/
.....'/
D~
/'
II
\'
/
IT' ,
II
,;I
/
"
- ~ r "
---
-""
'-
(
~/~
./'
)
\.
''-."
"-
\
'"
.
.
.
RAY D. PEn TEL
COMMISSION R
~'(\"~'~?~\~".
'f",1"~';I"\'!-t'-'~\
1 ,1;., ;,~ ~I~
t)): ;1 )~r""" .~.,t
II'~ r \',7;,:' 'I"~
}<: Iiltl~i\ ,r~
~.'\... I .,.-'1' ,,~
\J\ 'If" 'Ii,' I, ~~ ^,,'
~,.,(c- '1'~.~".. I.-j~;:. /y/
(~jt.."'.(~"--' .."!-<A'l'lf'
"""~.J:~~l~;~5~;'t"v
I ATTACHMENT E I
REOEIVED
JUN .;0 jlJ\jj
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI~lanning Dept.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. 0, BOX 671
CULPEPER, 22701 THOMAS F. FARLEY
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR
June 28, 1993
Mr. D. Fritz
Senil r Planner
Coun y of Albemarle
Dept of Planning and Community Development
401 ~clntire Road
Char ottesville, Virginia 22902
RE: SITE PLAN INVESTIGATION
Airport Mobile Home Park
Route 606 (SP 93006)
Albemarle County
Dear Mr. Fritz:
Upon review of the revised access roadway layout for the mobile home park, the
follpwing comments as outlined in your letter (Reference: Letter Fritz to
Hore~; Dated: 6/22/93) were generated:
1. The concept of the intersection is correct. However some adjustments to
the taper lengths and storage lengths of the turn lanes are necessary.
2.
For this section of Route 606, a design speed consistent with the speed
iimit would establish criteria for a 55 MPH section. Such design speed
will require minimum taper lengths of 200 If and minimum full width lane
lengths of 200 If. The transition lengths should also be based upon the
55 MPH design speed.
Regarding Route 606 capabilities of accommodating the additional traffic
generated by the proposed mobile home park, it is always desirable to
establish two access points for any subdivision in order to provision
for continuous access should an incident block the main access. In this
case, an access to Route 29 has not been seen as desirable due to the
nature of Route 29 and its future intentions.
Preliminary review indicates that Route 606 should be able to handle the
traffic. However, due to the characteristics of the vehicles which will
be utilizing this ingress/egress, concern is expressed over the safety
and operational characteristics of Route 606 following the introduction
of the more cumbersome vehicular traffic. The available correspondence
(Reference: Letter Muncaster to Fritz; Dated 6/18/93) indicates that a
build out of 15 years is planned. It would be advantageous to examine
the traffic after each phase is completed in order to more equitably
evaluate the operations of the facilities involved rather than attempt
to predict based on presumptions.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
.
.,
.
I ATTACHMENT E \ \ Page 2 \
Mr. . D. Fritz
Page 2
6/28 93
It is recommended that some means of agreement based upon phased
construction be established for determining the number of access point
requirements for this development
3. Assuming that the maintenance responsibilities of the road layouts are
s till consistent with prior submittals (Reference: Submi tted revised
plans; Dated: 5/24/93) whereby the only state maintained facility will
be proposed Road A, the conceptual layout is acceptable stipulative upon
the incorporation of exclusive left-turn lanes at each proposed
intersection with Road A, Again, similar with the Route 606
intersection, safety/operational concerns due to the nature of the
vehicles accessing this facility are reiterated.
Shou d there be any further questions regarding these comments, please contact
me.
JSH: s
~cp
J. S. Hores
Culpeper District Traffic Engineer
cc: Jr. J. A. DePasquale
J s. A, G. Tucke r
I ATTACHMENT F I
VIA FACSIMILE
REOEIVED
.~
William Fritz, senior Planner
artment of Planning
& Community Development
nty of Albemarle
McIntire Road
rlottesville, Va 22901
Proposed Airport Mobile Home park
IJ UI't , 8 1993
Planning Dept.
Bill:
B will acknowledge receipt of your June 22, 1993 letter
mitting a revised design for the above proposed project. While
simple purchase of airport property is no longer required, a
ht easement across land owned by the Airport Authority 1s
essary. Granting such an encumbrance is a policy matter to be
sidered by the Airport Authority Board. Moreover, any
umbrance on land owned by the Airport Authority requires
royal of the Federal Aviation Administration. As previously
ted, it is uncertain that such approval of any such encumbrance
ld be granted given the fact that this land use is not
patible with airport operations.
Elliott
of Aviation
4
.
Charlottesville-AlbemarlG Airport Authority
201 Bowen Loop · Charlottesville, VA 22901 . (804) 973-8341
.
.
.
I ATTACHMENT G I
RECEIVED
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Planning Dept.
Department of Inspections
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22()0l-4596
(804) 29b5832
l1E1-lORANDUM
To: Bill Fritz - Senior Planner
,
i
Jay Schlothauer - Deputy Director of Inspections~~.J
July 2, 1993
Re: Airport Mobile Home Park
Noise Standards
oday I spoke with Mr. Bim Scott, a corporate engineer with
akwood Homes in North Carolina. He had not received a copy of my
revious memo to you; so I faxed him one.
also read him the memo over the phone. Mr. Scott indicated that
hey do not have engineering data, on hand, concerning the noise
erformance of their homes, because HUD does not require it. (They
ave extensive records on thermal insulation performance.) His
irst off-the-cuff response was that their mobile homes will not
e able to meet the acoustical performance criteria of the Zoning
rdinance for installation in the airport noise impact area.
owever, he indicated that he will get with his corporate people,
fter receiving my fax, and come up with more concrete
onclusions.
I suggested that he use you as has primary contact person, in my
bsence. He indicated that he would probably work through the
ocal dealership in this situation.
Jesse Hurt
Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
Bob Brandenburger
Project File
I
I.
I
.,
11
~
.~~.j
~
~
~.:'i
~
!l.
J.!
1lIl
~
~
tp;
;e!
~.
mi
~
~
m
~
~
?,'1
~~~
!::!
I
;!1
~
~
iJe
Ii
~
i I
, I
. r ATTACHMENT H 1
II SOUND LEVELS ANTICIPATED WITHIN
THE MOBILE HOME PARK
AIRCR.i\FT c;OISE A~NOYANCE
100
80
:J1
~
.....
...
C:.l
a 60
~
CJ)
NOT
ANNOYED
I"'_~
....
c::
"'v
L.
~
::) 40
~
l:)
~
~
z
~
~ 20
~
c...
o
o
c; -
..I::J
63
75
Dl\Y-NIGHT A'lE.R.~GE SOliN!) LEVEL (I.mn
Figure 6.6
.Z\m,10YA~ICE CI>.!.1SED BY AIRCRAFT ~WI.sE IN
RESIDE~;TIAL Cm"11UNITIES ~1E}.R '<AJOR J..IRPORTS
Source: !"'.ic!1ards and Oller:.ead I "'10ise 3urden ??lctor-
~Te\" ~'1ay of ;:{c. ting .:;'ir::lort ~loise".
135
J. H. van ~er Horn
P. O. Box 182
Earlysvill~, Virginia 22936
es.A.
04) 97f -4978
I ATTACHMENT II
Mr Bill Fritz,
Debt. of Planning and Comm. Development
40 McIntire Road
Chl1rlottesville, Va. 22902
RECEIVED
JUL 0 8 1993
Planning Dept.
July 5, 1993
De fir Mr. Fr i t z ,
PlE ase consider this letter as a token of opposition to the place-
me Ilt of a mobile home park at the junction of routes # 606 and
74 .
It is my opinion that the development of a mobile home park in the
ex ens ion of the runway is irresponsible. One has only to remember
thE the crash of a plane on an appartment building in Amsterdam
to realize the dangers.
Fu thermore, when in the future the land in question will be needed
fo the extension of the runway, it will be an costly affair to
ob ain that land.
.
ThE impact of 256 families in the park on the rural community
as Earlysville will be very deep and will need a thorough study.
Sil cer~~y .
~ //
,
J.I. v- n der Horn.
.
Dean McWhorter Johnson
800 Quail Ridge Circle
Earlysville, VA 22936
(804) 973-1559
rn
- 1993
BOARD OF~RS
July 3, 1993
Mr, David Bowerman
c/o County Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Bowerman:
I am writing to express my vehement opposition to the application of Mr. W. Wood for a mobile
home park to be located at the intersection of Routes 743 and 606. The addition of 256 families
would overburden the road system that serves as an alternative to Route 29, To my knowledge,
the scale of this mobile home park is unprecedented, A development of such density and size
would greatly detract from the beauty of an area of Albemarle County that, despite growth, has
managed to retain a rural character appropriate to the County's historical nature,
Please do not be seduced by the argument that the area near the airport is unusable for any
other purpose than a mobile home park. This is not Newark, Los Angeles, or Chicago, The
presence of the airport in this area of the country in no way fouls the natural beauty of the area,
With the substantial growth that has been witnessed on Route 29 North, I believe the acceptance
of such a development will result in too great of a residential, commercial, and activity density.
I urge you to oppose the proposal for this mobile home park and preserve this area for
agricultural and wildlife purposes as it was originally planned.
ill
.
.
.
REOEIVED
Dean McWhorter Johnson
800 Quail Ridge Circle
Earlysville, VA 22936
(804) 973.1559
JUl 0 7 1993
Planning Dept.
July 3, 1993
Mr. Bill Fritz
c/o Department of Planning and Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Fritz:
I am writing to express my vehement opposition to the application of Mr. W. Wood for a mobile
home park to be located at the intersection of Routes 743 and 606. The addition of 256 families
would overburden the road system that serves as an alternative to Route 29. To my knowledge,
the scale of this mobile home park is unprecedented. A development of such density and size
would greatly detract from the beauty of an area of Albemarle County that, despite growth, has
managed to retain a rural character appropriate to the County's historical nature,
Please do not be seduced by the argument that the area near the airport is unusable for any
other purpose than a mobile home park. This is not Newark, Los Angeles, or Chicago. The
presence of the airport in this area of the country in no way fouls the natural beauty of the area.
With the substantial growth that has been witnessed on Route 29 North, I believe the acceptance
of such a development will result in too great of a residential, commercial, and activity density.
I urge you to oppose the proposal for this mobile home park and preserve this area for
agricultural and wildlife purposes as it was originally planned.
Dean M. Johns
@
8QNto Oft
SUPE'RVlSORS
Maurie D. Mcinnis
800 Quail Ridge Circle
Earlysville, VA 22936
(804) 973-1559
July 3, 1993
Mr. David Bowerman
c/o County Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Bowerman:
I am writing to express my vehement opposition to the application of Mr, W. Wood for a mobile
home park to be located at the intersection of Routes 743 and 606, The addition of 256 families
would overburden Route 743 and other roads that serve as an alternative to Route 29, A
development of such density and size would greatly detract from the beauty of an area of
Albemarle County that, despite growth, has managed to retain a rural character appropriate to
the County's historical nature.
Please do not be seduced by the argument that the area near the airport is unusable for any
other purpose than a mobile home park, The airport traffic is not particularly heavy. The
presence of the airport in this area of the country in no way fouls the natural beauty of the area.
With the substantial growth that has been witnessed on Route 29 North, I believe the acceptance
of such a development will result in too great a residential and commercial density in an
otherwise rural areal,
I urge you to oppose the proposal for this mobile home park and preserve this area for
agricultural and wildlife purposes as it was originally planned,
Thank you for your consideration,
AfIJlWvf) f(C~
M~U~, D, Mcinnis
.
,
.
REOEIVED
JUl 0 7 1993
Planning Dept.
Maurie D. Mcinnis
800 Quail Ridge Circle
Earlysville, VA 22936
(804) 973-1559
July 3, 1993
Mr. Bill Fritz
clo Department of Planning and Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville , VA 22902
Dear Mr. Fritz:
I am writing to express my vehement opposition to the application of Mr. W, Wood for a mobile
home park to be located at the intersection of Routes 743 and 606, The addition of 256 families
would overburden Route 743 and other roads that serve as an alternative to Route 29. A
development of such density and size would greatly detract from the beauty of an area of
Albemarle County that, despite growth, has managed to retain a rural character appropriate to
the County's historical nature,
Please do not be seduced by the argument that the area near the airport is unusable for any
other purpose than a mobile home park. The airport traffic is not particularly heavy, The
presence of the airport in this area of the country in no way fouls the natural beauty of the area.
With the substantial growth that has been witnessed on Route 29 North, I believe the acceptance
of such a development will result in too great a residential and commercial density in an
otherwise rural areal.
I urge you to oppose the proposal for this mobile home park and preserve this area for
agricultural and wildlife purposes as it was originally planned.
Thank you for your consideration,
4~~~,Df((~
.
'.
.
Office of Planning & Development
~ounty Office Building
~01 McIntire Road
~harlottesville, VA 22901
REOEIVED
JUl 0 6 '993
Planning Dept.
pear Mr. Fritz,
We were very concerned yesterday when we heard the news that your office is
~lanning to recommend that all children from the 250 trailer park being developed near the
~ put ~ in Earlysville be sent to Broadus Wood Elementary School. We have a child
~ntering Kindergarten in the Fall and were assured by the Principal at the school that
the use of trailers as classrooms and ongoing construction would not be a problem after
construction is completed this summer. We live in a small subdivision of fifteen homes
and nineteen school-age children as well as seven children under the age of five. We have
agonized with our neighbors over the disruption in schoolwide and communitywide
programs on site at Broadus Wood as a result of the construction over the last eighteen
months or so. Our concern is that there is no way of knowing how many children
will be added to the already near full capacity of the school by way of the trailer park.
The school is incapable of holding additional trailers for classrooms without losing
substantial playground or parking space, both which are at a premium on the site.
We realize that you have the unpleasant task of trying to balance the need
for development in a growing community with the use of existing resources, however,
we feel it is both unfair and unwise to sacrifice the educational future of the children
of a community in the interest of development and that includes the children from the
trailer park. We understand that some parents object to the influx of a large number
of students from a lower economic background and we want to assure you that this is
.
~
.
of no consequence to us. We believe firmly in public education and diversity among
student populations. Our question is whether the resources currently available can
accommodate a large influx of students whatever their economic situation.
Perhaps future development in our county needs to put additional responsibility on
developers for an additional elementary school if all schools in the District are at/near
maximum capacity ?
We hope that if you still feel that the current proposal is best you will help us to
better understand so that we can continue to feel secure and positive about our public
school system.
Very Sincerely,
;;i4v~/~
Lisa & Dean Harman
4530 Mill Run Lane
Earlysville, V A 22936
.
a
.
ReOEIVED
.J U ]'/ 1" 1 ') '/ :::::
JUl 0 6 1993
Planning Dept.
IVlr-" i,: L .i.l F Ii, t, ;:':
C: 0 \"i, r'; + u -[' (:1 1 I:J E,:' rn ":'1" :I. E"
Office of Planning and Development
County OftLce Building
il U 1 1"1 c i Ii t I I' E' h: c; EI, c:I
Charlutto0ville VA 2200.1
DE'~<:H" 1'1,.-" F i':i t;:
Th E.' D I.,:,,. U C)'::>F-::' C)+ t hi. '::; :I. e'l.: t el~ J~::; t. u E:';'~ p,.- E~'::; ~::; OLl."" c un c: €,~,... r'l i::', ~::; "':',
resident ot Earlysvi:l.le over the planed development of a 250
s; i C] h t, !" i" .c:\. I 1 ((:!,." p ;,:ll" I:: n E! .;.:\,... t. h E~ <::0, :i. /'. p 0 I~ t "
Their are several reasons for are concern which include~ the
attraction of a disproportionate number of :l.ower priced
hou~:;i nc! ,,:'r'ld!',hc' (~'+fc!c:t!,:; :i t. ~'J:i I J h,:I,VE' 01-\ t:. 1"1 ",.:' PI'''opc:,/,..ty \/<~11 UE!
of '1,'llt:, L::;:i~::;t:Inq hOmE'!'::; In t,he> al"C>2~ t.i-t:I:i.IE',,/,' pElI'''k.:;; h;;;',VE:' i::1 VE~I"Y
p 0 [) 1-' I' I..:'! r:' U t3 t :i (:> n f 0"" m '0\ }, n ten an c: E.' 1 h ':" V E' n C! v ('21'- ',:, f.-? F.-? n El, t !'.. ail Eo' i~
pi:\r"j. 11,:l.t, 1/.,12,,::, 1i', C,lOUd /"F:'pi::lil'-~ le'. thE.:,! cu,,"r'IC:'I'" c'-t 1"'I\/c:lI''',c''1L1,llC
<,:r n cl :': I C" ,::, !' I d e:1 n c, \i [:, ,.- c: I" 0 '''J cJ ii-I (J (:J .f l:./"', (.:;:, E' 1 F;' fTl E':' n t d 1'- Y <co, c: ti D U 1
~::) \/ ~::; .t". (.:-:., f!": 1
V.I E:' ~:; -I, I (, ,": ql 'v' I.) ,." q E~ t', h (,:.:, c:: D rn m:l '1.:, t E~ E: t u c: un!::; I c:1 E' I'" t,: I'; c h E' '::;1"
:i, n 1,:', (:,! I (,:':::, t C) '~" thE: c: 0 rn rn u n :i. t:, 'y' ,J I") cl 1-' E' c: 0 n r,; j cI (.::, I" t h <-?:':i I'" \I D t. E' D 1'1 t h :i. ~::;
mdt,t'(':':'1 j,'/ I"c':'oi<:-:,'c::tin(] '::.:hc: pl~'Upc)!::;dJ 'L.u hu.:ilc:l <J, :?~::.'!O J.Jn:i.t. t:,"',:::lilc'l'-
p .0.1'- 1-: :i;', I: ''':', I'" 1 \/ ~:; './i .l 1 <-:,,! .
c)
D a, \/:i. (I :::, ri d ;:.:.) c:\:i. 1
500 Vll]aqC Woods
1:: E~ ". :I ',i::::, \/ 1 J l E! 'J I.) (i
.
(!)
.'
Kathleen R, Stevenson RECeiVED
,510 Village Woods Lane
Ll1'1)'5vil1c, Virginin 22936 JUL 0 6 1993
9~~, 7IdJ 1 ri~~~3
/odut JliAn0 C1 Il- ~
6jllh 14Jw;;:j; .~~ td ~ ~~/~
(JAMU,,/I d Y)f;lM ~ d./ :29/)),
Jri!J >>4- M' tit- iL f~
~ ~/ ~~15{7 ~, T~
;L; ~ l/.i -;~ {~ ./'& 5"&1
(}l:tdJ/0! JI d L,k .i Ik ~ . .
~ c:uu d)! :J..!; & ~ k~ ~
dJ~, ;!J pj k; &bv'4. ~ fI Aew
aclctk7V/ ~ ~ rt: tfl0.</}..j ~e/ ~
4 7 oJ/v~) 'iJIe/ it. ~ ~
-I kCJ ~ ~kMJ 1:.&u j//7 tf
H/~/NdtJ ~ t0kd/ 15111 tuPdl
.
.
t1:.0VJ'A?!-.d-~. fll! ~/!IrAL J?/U - o/,,-(idh' -/..7 ,t;,? /J,p . (IJ
~ <- -{.-tl " ~V<.';(1aLv
/ /1, .. .f . I . I
t'J; fIe.. ?c?Jd' . HcUV .Mi~~/ ~ titZv
Ij; -H-" /) /l / _ 1 IJ ~ /1 ~ / '" }
~7(/JA"J C.{.UIt?ffNdE lA1tZ,?Jl #Cr~ t21L Irr
f'l 3J ~c 14 ~,
.. fld~ III ~ V'JC{ ~~ ~:
(//J/ tlfJt( - /i.J!7zkJ ~~ thd a /- /,;~ p.# J -
. f 1 ;t/71"'-/ I' 7/'
fJ!AC!.e.t. Ai!U, 7i.. ~-.: .'Jt1:t'AL /llv.rw
djla",d ;zt ~v rU>./ j!a~ Ie act$'j1Jde/
ct!1 " n /J 1/ /7 ;:, - /, /l -,I t -:H<.
fJ-J'ile. ~' vAL ~~ -,f-?tL ~c MCL)
fAf2Zt tP-J ! ~~ ~MVL' 10 ;k6, /,1;;;?7f!/U
'tlut MA .dc;;t;;;d $,,!tt,.!c ~u
/
/klWt/lJ I
j)fA/e!'tbV CI/lld . 'li/lVNM ~ !<U
~?~l?~ 7;JN2/ ,~'tfl ~~/Iiu
/N~~) dj~frJ:"d ~1L 1(I/{tdL~ ~ .
ad) ((/-<-{f /, J,1; -IL ~ "y IL IAAltu
I 0 r i
, 't~ (ttwl ;IiuI- VuY v!tt"!i j fk N&V
~-nI M!Ca~-/ - ;k ~N ,o;(ll~-M
~/I # Ii)- ~ t:&--u A!ttr./{j-l;JI/If/,'<M0 II-u
-;fl-1A~ 1(/ IUt - ~~t' p;J -I~ ~,
-
.
.
@
l\all,lccl1 1\. Stevenson
5JO Vil]ni~c \\'oo<]s 1,ane
Filt,lvSYillr. Vil'glniil :2CJ:-J()
,
/I ~-&-c4 Ji.f IL/ k, tJJk~ a/
'1ud /l-u..l-ih. ~/u ~-EW:UZ;u~ (u~~/;
f.-;-I ;; !I. ;/;/ /1 :7
/ h p:d...t~ed R/ ~4?2-N./ c:J,~#
/e/{'Lf./ it~ k1A.i L.-<U1~4 to {l1t4I-(t1j~//
-(I 1/
'J/~;/ L
VmM Jr:t4 !~~ l:J
!ld[;-I~v It !L/~tI;:u , II<'IC ~
fii: IkLcL~,j;;:- {0j (,~tr.1 N/.-v (!~u
,6< ~al Li'L I/-t. ~ ~~ i
:.iM'<'I;r...v, (J.
/ '7 -
,j?r"vef,1i-7l; j"
J --I-J.-/ r/
/"-tU/J/i~~;< , LJ(W~
q13 -/16 f /)
pS, ~j.o .fCl~ fl;];~J 1'~ ~ tl g~.d
?ut-dl Jit;).~It1-f; . ~ /-JAUJ ~ 1e/~>>
w ~, F / / -.~-~.
.
.
.
.
.
ft1t ~E:, (~ E ~. \~i' IE: [J)
'l~i ,) " \ L.i VJ'
Jl.~\ L.. ,,I lu
- J' I . \1~. \ ' ~.~'\ II r;, ~.',: ~~.'., '~..... .'
~ \:~i r-: ~'-~t t r1; ~;j hV' ~ j -
3230 Monroe st.
Earlysville, Va 22936
June 21, 1993
Mr. William Fritz, Senior Planner
Albemarle County Planning Commission
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, Va 22902-4596
RE: proposed mobile home park, airport vicinity
Rtes 29 and 606, northern corridor, Albemarle County
Dear Mr. Fritz:
It has come to my attention that the planning commission ~s shortly
to make recommendations concerning the above captioned matter. I
should like to voice my opposition and concern to such a mobile
home park being located in this area. There are several reasons:
1. This area is close to the airport and would create instant high
density housing in a potentially dangerous area, due to aircraft
landing patterns.
2. As an otolaryngologist (ear surgeon),
about noise levels for residents of this
proximity.
l' woul d be concerned
park, due to ai rport
3. For such density of housing, little support services are
currently available, such as bus routes, secondary roads, etc.
4. Such a large park will create a severe burden on schools in
this area, already sorely taxed by the extremely rapid completion
of Forest Lakes subdivision. It is unlikely that they will be able
to adequately serve children from this park, without either
construction or massive and vexsome bussing out of the community.
Your attention to my concerns during your deliberation and
recommendations to the Board of Supervisors is most appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
("- .
" ... \. I ~-" (-
JtcuG. ,~\\ }~,C~l't)i)l [').f~ )
I
CharI es M. Johnson, I I I, MD
r,:,- -_'"',)J-
.
.~
-. /
.
_ ' r,
j. ;, f_' . L _j
,- ..
I. -,_ I
-" '.' . -' ".
'. l~i . "-' :___ l i
~ - -.
'-- _ . '._' ..,'.... ~. i
. '-..'';''
J lIJ~ (l, 199~
Greg Ilnd CarmeJl FisdK~r
JIC1Rox16
EnrJysvillc, V ^ 229:1()
97!S- J 812
;" --M , Bill Fritz
01 'ice of Planning and Dcwl(lflment
Al~emHrk Cuunty Offke Building
4( 1 Mclmirc H.(J
Cl arlottesvil1c. V ^ 22901
RECEIVED
JUl 0 6 1993
Planning Dept.
J'C Mobilr. Home Park JlC',ar EnrJywille
(, 'ee1.ing Ml'. Frill.,
A~ 1 f1m sure you've. lx'.en busy fir.lding amI rc.f;l,.~ft1l:hillg the dewlopmenl of tile 25()
mphHc home park, 1 wish 10 view my opinion bdon~ tonig.ht meeting liS nm unahk LO
at end.
I lh,iCCllo tbis devc:.lopmcnl! Two hundrcd fifty mobile hOl11e~ in one men is just
te (1 ()vel\vhdJllin~, Traffic on RT 29 and 743 docs not nt:.t'.d to be greater. 1 under-
st~nd the need for low inL'(Hne housinI~ and w(~ need l0 Sl1ppoll. this, tJ1t~ugh supporting
~ Il:h H mohilc home sile. would be n mist.ake, Lc.l'S look al smalkr sites that WDlJld
c. lcompn~." f(~wcr home.s. Route ?") south is also and /ln~a that's under dl~V(~lnped
n)(1 sl1cmld he l.:ollsidercd. The few trailer parks thnt 1 havl; been in seem to degrade
it short time and oL:eupancies 111rf1overs are high. therefore making it unsuitahle for
tl c aren nrcmnd EarJYl'ivillc und north west Alhc.mmk County,
} () to this dcvc.lopmenl.
'I hank yon for YOll consitkratioll and time,
1 eganl~,
(~r('g and Cnrmr.n Fisc-her
/.: X
. "fl,-
( 4 .' / ...j' -/.(.,.' '....
..'t \.... .' . '<
.
fi
.
RECEIV~D
. JW/i2llftV
Planning Dept.
Al '?$ dJ '/jA. '7t '-.-/-
qlL:d-t /' ~ ''D1-t:! b ~'1(/{cr /
, ~ - ,+- 'J"
/L~ c: a'~~k,-:~7tJ0~ /~,f)e~/A ~ '~'L~;
; L~C Yl-L.-e':-1../}':LC./ ,~if~o.-?~ ~ //~ .# 0---'::" ',~
· '/7~c-/~ ~7~u! ~~ ,-;;- ~ -a ;ij'&,{Jb
.~e-a:~~~_th~~~
./I~?I ml:A. t!~, ;t~'I-/, L/.?-t-Y'->. --c../?Z.a'/z-AC,~
# < /~ . , 7
' CA:.,i,J7JL:4? :/[;-c'/?"~-t~J7::l~.~, -~-z, . C?Z-C-7 L~'-4./
. : ~~~, /lA ~~~~ ~J~-Fl4 .aCA7 c1.
. . !t:;"'./ ~y ~--vt !A-.: ~-Zn~./2-7' ,
.c:vLt'<:I, ~ 4; ~"--;qy" ~. ~~~
, .i~.rI~~ _ 0-7~/! ~/~ " ~~~/-c"" .--7/[..~q
~.'~~.U-7oJ3-e.~~, ,--z~'~cJ4/ff~-k~
..' ~~r/;;.:~, ~~,Y~<4. CVW4 7
~.~~ 'k! 45-- Ate. aAcc:&, d'2e-~
>.//~,'t/~,.., d~-o7-V_l.. <,/ha'L--~_ C::~-Z--~
Cr:7'Z.d-u--~~.,/~~~~~, ~
. ~~kJ-/a-t~ ~40?/ ~rz/~-7~--n-~~
~"rzz,-Y;t( ./t'M ~ ..~. ~'K?
.. 7/n~,'~ ..~/lW2i/-L['(/7~ C-a~~~*
.,41/., C( dft~~C-<'.-c-' ~~~c..';;::~
d~=~~, ,c?7../7 .-1~Ac1-o-f/.! A/~~/ /'
~LZ , J::7/Lrh'5l/ . d~'~~ ~-Y
~~~- ':7 ~~ ?~-1 ~~:J::?77 .
'f.c-r-;?'ufiT~;L."': ~r:,c-/? /7-~.n; ~~,,/,a-/~
..
(+' ~'~ \ ~ I - ~ ~"". .:.:~ Cl
. it ':;1 ''oi i ~ ."..'\ _) ; 1
!
,
., i~i,~~~~~~~~~~ . J4 ~?,?.z;0
c>>;,-1{yl'", 1".'....'. ~.~ /:/0
"tl/~Z/7Lf1._ "'2-. ,~. ~~.A~L-;1,-~"'~
~/?c;t:;//:z:;-t%::' en-; c/?-u:0z;4? -/ 2/ ,
r"'~-T"~ ~ c-f ~7d-// C~~-<A4t-
: /~~ A~/,~;7 -?~~~; "
!A~T dA;~ / ?c4f/~ a~ ~~~~.
i~/ /'?fd-c;&~ ~. ' . . --/~ CcL~~
: ?Mf a?'~.--o~ 2 ,~ . ... ;;~I/-a~-4~
!Mn~. ~~ {.', <:;' ~ ~~/-t- ~<";<v
!,~ v?L?-4-'1-~ ~-7-c..4-?J a .~~ A~,\
~:c:t'7 -~ a4~/ .dP4. ,.!R~,
1ti ~~.". . -, ~~ ~~~. ?/: }c-$
'l4~~7/' ~;/- ~ - r
. ,~?; Ct" .;~~- ~ ...4;4f 6FZ//~/J.'L-C-r. }._-~
! uA ,4A'~~ / ~ - .A~riA1f. . ./<j~~~ ~-~
~. V-/2.L~~/~~.. / -z'r_~ ~"~-4J
i:7/k'd~~" . :-c~r&./~ ~~
, /) / ~ / ~__ _ +- _ ~ ;:7 ',_ /
~[r-z1?c&a4 /J.. - ~/ //'q// .~~ ~
~~--0' ~ ~~~-t:/Zt? C%. ~~~~
~ 4~'Zd~/ if/tP~" /~,~ 4
l--t,.k~..&~~;;; A ~/-;4~ . yq/
I ~---?441 ~ 4/ ~~4 a-?'~~ ~ U4;;7
~c~~~~//& ,~~'0~~ "
'/f'{.y Ud /~/d./~~~~ /"Z~/C70/ ~
\ ~?f!:Fd'-e--nT dd 4' /.:5r /'r~-7--;
7 O?.?~ a---u4 ,
t
.
.
~
.
" I ~;/~/ L ' .L/ Cl // . - ~h--
. V (7-;~t/!' -c:-z.;-t-?r? -:?7-;!c'~Zt:> Zd.-;?~~
';/l(:~~~?',;;6; dc~. ~. ,~~/c~~~
;1::51< ,dJ d~4 ,_ Aa(/~~ a ;;j~
{f i :f:~5fr\R~ d0Tzc4 ntAe--c~ J/Ac
If; It (k.-~d ~~rlrcJ IiZ 'P~.Z47 ~
~,:c/ k/U. ( V'!1..)?L~J ct l/-t--C-/ -&-Of{
.,~~ 714 ?l~ a f LZ ~/()( ~~#~e /uc~
"L1 atcr~"Le f' ~? dut;~~c..----.~7j-~ _
.'{-:,.y.k~ ''---u:~~1Y ..ek_~-u O--NZV.7 '_Z_/
d>,;j:L>-A.C~l .--z::f' t/z ,J'z<-d ---v-a!f:2;/-u-e----b--c/ k:.
/~ / c--7 pi //~. -" .# / /1./~
(/ t-~-'1 .6L-C~~~-oty I-/Y:/-"L< C-/", .~ ~r" /~~
. ~L';# _~ '~~ ~leP.A~-:-f / J/ ~~Y ~'1)
:C;7~5 0 C4feY &rl~/ -~ .~~ _~~~ :
J!. ex C~& ;#/at' ~t ,i.--:J a -~ ~ ~
6z~AC~Z-h""-P ,~cf-TZ~, ~~ ~,~~
,tl-t~,:I do- "-;1~ #k/ ~~ .~~~-e/ ~& a;:/
ct'? .P..-/~ ~-,-rk ~-: <:~~~ Lid
?--::9/C4.-1 ,;I~ a.dy-n/ ~""~ ~
A'~ t~ #1~-n.<~,~ d~/~~ C/
P1Jltt;i~;~ :t~~;~~ ~ ,.,f
~ifld1J,C&-7~- ;U;~/~d ~~~
'4 ..:f24: 4{~ /~-"/--7--L~--Z~ ,~~e:.'..
//>, ;1@~ ",-/e-- cJP il!2' c;r-rl .:6- ~
{,fi'-'iC*:.n:l ~~ ~v7zd ~-1/J -~
/ZL7;:Y a --?-YI.-t'-dh:c:-;?i.C7~-< ~ -LLJ
.
.~,
.
i ~{<':~'~~~f~ /7t~.d~~/r(-/
L .-'"-J~A' d/L-i-L~--t;'LJZ2./j~/ a/I' ---t::t/cp ~~/h.c?
, r ,f;;/h~'V~, o-t"~?, ~ Evzr~:
UC~e/u7
?7Y ~ ~<-~J~__/<-c-,v-J "
V,L5.-1.tI-adt'4 /YHJ7/ /'70 Ac.z.et.;
1-; 1.-- Lj3t7s ,1-
!
.
..-,/ -L' J~ / ~_~~
i~~;u /Lvv>c,L- - ", ,~::; /~J ,-?~'7 "'/7':,/-
.----2"cl( C"~C~"'1/( .~" /l'j'f-e{;lttf, ~0<7 dadc<'7<-d
! ~-Y'-ZL/!{ ~{~7 ;z:t:: c/7.c/) c:2~J7/~-L~ad c_~/~~
. -/ +- .~/v:; cL'/;
: -<2<: -i.e, d/UC7'/' //{e' ~'/..c ,,-~u7"/-'-[' II /;.' r
: -1~t.2,/ &~t? A)//""'-erf' h>--d--cr/".s C</2<?--J~L'?--
i th{./f~~---lyj, . Zo-: -t ~<.2< (n,<-'1 4-C~'-z~~~;f c--e17"'VV)~I/~.>~:vc.-<:;:Z:;'-r
I .
. . . J. f ~
i ~0.J:;.,-,;:z-/L;t&-, /'~.I\. Xf~ C~7'V"7'-U__&v"-~
;e?~~/ .e;~ ~~--t-~l .;~l-r'-P CLL(/7!-~ C' ~
: '. ~ -- 6:t -11./ tfg" ~
;. . . ~q;, Ip ",. ..
1./. /./' .)--7--z,....-r><-~... -7--:3-" ~. -. . . ii~., /C--7.. -z.,.yVl....---t-_..
i L-e. /. f) ~
i t-;hL h~"'-i~7 ~~~;..k;I o-#,~zi:?:i7
1f/lOyjJ 7' ~ ~..f.-?$ ~~ ~~
.
.
.
REOEIVED
7)0/'13
JUl 0 7 1993
iJ~ lnr/lJJ~1 Planning Dept.
V~~~~~
~ ~ ~ '-fMf~~
fJcJ -t( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f~~ ~ pV'--/kJ ~. (yuG,
i . 0-vc /r ,~ ~;.-o..-J I:ft-.J ~
lev ~~~ ~ w~~
. Cr--I l) ~ tJ vol) yj~. U dJ-J ~
I , .
.~.~~~~J
iJ~tJ~ 0'cLu ~ ao~ k0
,,J:.) ~~. rw.. Vv~ f1 ''''/1 ~
!.~, ~,~rcr~LYo~ ~'/r
~~!~~'f~~
~ ~.~~.,6,~~~0
~ ~ iqJ-9~j w"k~ 1~ ~~
!'b,~ U~/ ~ ~,~
iw~ ~~ ~~ JVJ-&~
I~~(j~~~
i v:7cJ J~.
I 0Jv~,f,~~
!~ ~J-oC'Jr-~ ,~
I . ..
i~ L...rcuJ ~ c4<J ' j ~
!~! ~ \j-- ~- ~ ~~
icfA~L<Jk) /G ~ ~tti--J.cJ~ ~
,'-J() ---- - , .
!~ ~~O~7S
.
i ~ 7tM-J.~, 0 ,~C-~~~
; ~m~ J 0- /tIv.--,--10 /./'0 JA-) ~.--J ;td
j~ ~ /~:~/~ i -:u.0~-.J
~L~ ~~~.U~
! 010 ~ JV ~~ uvr12~~
i M r ~j,--, fu~--r- ~ ~ ;V-l-uJL
~~~~~'
Jiu~r~~ ~,
'f~ ,~' tk~~ c.~ -n...J ,
~ 77~G;i~~~
.0",--- eM ,~O~ ~ 'f~'
.r~ ~~ ~~~
i. cJ0lL~ '^a.. ~
. J2 U - '.P~ ~~" ?1
: ,~ ~ ~ ~ -f''"V(-V--__
,~~ '-h~ ~~ (v,-,C ~~)
~ ~ ~ ec.U tvU.J. '
~)
(J~o' ~ '~~ Co.
CJ~F~ID~,
oIc113 ~
.
.
.
.
.
Jeff & Diane Shriver
1355 Earlysville Forest Drive
Earlysville, VA 22936
REOEIVED
JUL 0 7 1993
DJ '
, ann/ng Dept.
ill Fritz
ept. of Planning & Community Development
01 McIntire Road
harlottesville, VA 22902
ear Hr. Fritz,
We are writing this letter in regards to a proposed
obile home park near the junction of Rt 606 and 743. We
re OPPOSED to any development of this nature for many
easons. It is inconsistent with plans for developing a
igh-tech industrial center near the airport, a mobile home
ark would detract from this. We do not want the additional
urdens on our roads or schools. We are also against this
ecause of the type of people such parks attract would only
ave negative impacts on the community. other such parks,
or example, the one on Rio road, are an eyesore and add to
ommunity problems. Also we do not want the additional
rime in our area that is normally associated with mobile
ome parks.
Sincerely,
/{/Iv s~
~~
Diane Shriver
.
.
.
RECEIVED
575 Mi.ll f,un
E~J:1' 1 Y e.ov ~ l1. E:-,
July 1, 1'393
JUl 0 7 1993
Planning Dept.
CaLlJ.'t
"ii"'" .229::~6
Bi J. F':c i oL::
Q~ ~ce G~ Plann~ng and Development
Co~nty O~f:Lce Building
40 KcIn~ire Road
Ch i'11'lat-tes'.lill.:-, VA 22901
De 'r tfr, rJ.' it:::
We were very upset to learn of the proposal to bu~ld a 236 family
mo ::J~le home pal'k near Earlysv~lJ.e and that all of the children
wo ~ld be at. tending Broadus Woad School. Ae you must know, B:coadus
Wo pd w ~ll be complet~ng a maj or renovat~on th~E' Pall, a renovat:Lon
th ~t trJose of us ....:~.th school chi.ldren j'..lst su:f:fe:ced thl'ough all
ye r. As I understand ~ t the renovat~on did not allow :fa:c m""r,y
ad< it~onal ch~ldren. I~ this 236 :fBm~ly t:caile:c park is approved
we could be looking at almost 500 add:Ltional children, assuming an
av rage ef two ch~ldren per home. If E've:l hal:f o:f these extra
ch ldren come to Broadus Wood, the tra~lerB needed to accommodate
thE~m would by necessity remove some o:f the play~ng :f~elds ai'
pa k~ng lots wh~ch are already of m~n~mal size.
~e who have been liv:ing
to have our children's
so Ie landowners' des~re
here and pay:ing tBxEe here do net dese:cve
educational experience su:f:fer because o:f
to make an :income of:f o:f his land.
P1E ase help us prevent devel,;:,pment o:f housing whel-J the services are
ne available to accommodate the new ~arnil~es. Let's take care o:f
th€ o\le:ccrawd~ng t!',at already ex~sts be:fare 'We br~ng in more
ch~ldren to Btra~n l~mited resources even :further.
:~l (\ , (I 1
\ V : \ r. I" ,- \ V ' --- r JY"O\
--.J/p~ 0,L~~0~4JI \. V1 )
. {! '!' tl ,~A.~ 1._/
Stephen G. Str~ckland
S~ncerely,
0/0 .I ii A',._ ./ ,1.// I /. j--; /} ;/
. - '--"---'-, , /..J"v/L~;,(-(..:A=.Yfl--,.-(~
Karen S. Strickland
",,-
-\lor
r
/,"); S f
711ft/If 3
Mr. and Mrs. Wayne Hotchkiss
4280 Pine Grove
Earlysville, VA 22936
JJL 121m
00
M~. David Bowerman
cVo Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
July 12, 1993
Dear Mr. Bowerman,
I We are writing to you to voice our opposition to the mobile
hpme park that is currently being considered for the intersection
of 606 and 743 near the airport. We hope that you will listen to
ahd consider our concerns as well as those of other homeowners in
the area.
. We are very concerned about the negative impact that an
atlditional 256 families would have on the area. We would like you
to know that we strongly oppose this project for the following
reasons:
1) The roads and schools and public facilities are already
o~erloaded as it is.
2:) There is a tremendous amount of development already in progress
in this area. As we understand it, Forest Lakes South will add
another 800 homes over the next few months. (Just think about
t~is. If each of those 800 homes has an average of 2 drivers in
tne family, that puts an additional 1600 people on highway 29, most
likely at peek traffic time.) Additional developmental expansions
in the works in this area include Hickory Ridge, Advance Mills
V~llage, and Loftlands to name only a few.
3:) At the present time, the drive to Earlysville via Rt. 743 is a
p~easant one. The addition of over 256 more families would create
a: burdensome traffic problem.
4:) The value of many properties, including our own would certainly
decrease. We have put much hard earned money into our home hoping
that it would be an investment that would appreciate over time
rather than depreciate.
5) With this next point, we do not want to sound like arrogant or
self-serving people. However, it is a fact that a mobile home
park, or a trailer park, is very often not aesthetically pleasing
to behold. You may look at the intersection of Rio Road and Rt.
743 to confirm this.
6) The original plan to preserve this area for agriculture and
wildlife should remain in place. certainly Mr. W. Wood will not
suffer financial hardship by retaining this area as originally
p~anned. We suspect that Mr. Wood never intended to leave this
a~ea untouched, and his application to rezone this area confirms
this.
-"'
l.o
7) We understand the need to create affordable housing in Albemarle
unty and support that goal wholeheartedly. However, there are
tter ways to achieve this. It is widely known that mobile homes
e "affordable" in the short term; but, over the long term, they
e poor investments that NEVER appreciate nor do they add value to
e surrounding area. The parks deteriorate over a very short
ount of time.
Simply put, we are vehemently OPPOSED to the rezoning of this
ea for a mobile home park. Please think carefully on the long
nge impact on this. Also, consider that, in going through with
is, you will be sacrificing the good of many for the seeming good
a very few. Thank you for your wise and thoughtful
nsideration of our concerns.
... --.
Iu Y 9, 1993
ffi JUL ~ ~':3 ~ tOO
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
D vid P. Bowerman
C airman
Al emarle county Board of Supervisors
Al emarle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, VA 22901
A well planned, quiet, safe, friendly community is a rare item these days and extremely hard
to find. Earlysville Forest is one such place. Unfortunately, this developement and other
su rounding areas are in danger of being destroyed. While destroyed may seem harsh--it is
ap ropriate. A Mobile Home Park at the juncture of 606 and 743 will be nothing but
de rimental to all residents of this area.
Br adus Wood Elementary School is small quiet and has a good reputation. We would like to
ke p it that way. A 256 family mobile home park would place a great strain on the school's
fi ancial and structural resources, We moved to Earlysville so that my two children would have
th t intimate touch that so many of the larger schools seem to lack,
E rlysville Forest is a planned community. It was planned to be small, friendly, and private.
H w long do you feel our five ponds will last when the children of these 256 families decide
to explore the neighborhood? How private will our main roads be after these 256 families
de ide to conduct their "Sunday Drive" through our streets? And how safe will our roads be
af er these 256 families add their traffic to 606 and 743? We moved to Earlysville for the
10 ation and the rural atmosphere. Our driving time to the University of Virginia is now 20
m'nutes due to traffic. If just half of the 256 families have two cars, that's 256 more cars on
th road. Thereby, effectively increasing travel time to 35-40 minutes.
A d let's consider the other residents of the proposed building site. Yes, the raccoons can be
an inconvenience when they visit garbage cans during the night. On the other hand, the deer
ar a benefit of our area and help create that country look that so many residents of our
co unity enjoy. The site is already zoned for agricultural and wildlife purposes. WHY
R IN A GOOD THING?
,.,
A d of course there is always the important issue of property values and appearances. We
m ~ved to Earlysville Forest because it is a stable community. We did not want to wake up
ev~ry morning wondering if the neighbor was going to leave junk cars in his driveway. Sure,
it'~ his driveway and if he wants to leave junk cars in it that's his right. But we don't want to
10 ~k at it. Therefore, we agreed to abide by a set of covenents that make you roll your eyes but
ke~p the neighborhood nice and the property values consistent. If looking for a new home, we
certainly would be put off by the appearance of a 256 family Mobile Home Park. I firmly
be ieve that Mobile Home Parks are not regulated strictly enough and in time will become
uI1attractive--an eyesore that everyone would have to look at everyday as they travel to and from
w ~rk. For example, the mobile home parks on 743 and Rio Road near the Rock Store and the
0* off of 250 East. Neither are shining examples of the Mobile Home Park at its finest.
In summary, I firmly believe that allowing Mr. Wood access to develope this site would have
a lrery negative impact on any community within a 20 mile radius. Why should one person's
de~ire to expand affect hundreds of families who are perfectly happy? In these days of noise,
coPfusion, violence and uncertainty, Mr. Wood's request would destroy our last defense against
th world, our home.
Si~cerely,
c.' ..
.~ ~~t C~-,- c ;_.~
~/", ---
(/..-~JJ-L. L-<5;;;l.J~L~~
G. ry C. Potter
R( becca K. Bichard
10~0 Hunter's Ridge Road
E(lrlysville, Va 22936
cc Bill Fritz
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Charlotte Humphries
Walter Perkins
Forrest Marshall
Charles Martin
Sandra and Fred Funke
4220 Rowan Court
Earlysville, VA 22936
00
@ i:]. .' ~ n
~ .1-..,---'::2'1 ! n !
JJL I I.. j;:'..
J ly 9, 1993
I j
L~OARO OF SUPERVISORS
avid Bowerman
Bard of Supervisors
4 1 McIntire Road
arlottesville, VA 22902
Re: W. Wood's application for Mobile Home Park
at intersection of Route 606 and Route 743
in Earlysville
ood Morning:
e are residents of Earlysville Forest and request that the Board of Supervisors deny Mr.
ood's application to develop a mobile home park at the intersection of 743 and 606.
ere is already far too much traffic on Route 743 and we are already plagued with the
n ise and pollution from the airport. Please do not force us to deal with heavier traffic,
h avier pollution, not to mention the aesthetic value of that now beautiful area that will be
I st by development of a mobile home park, especially one of that magnitude.
E rlysville Forest currently is one of the best real estate resale areas in the county. A
obile home park in our backyard would greatly reduce our resale values.
dditionally, the farm on 743 at that corner is quite beautiful with a nice view of the
ountains and residential properties. There are few areas in metropolitan Charlottesville
I ft that are still beautiful.
P ease deny Mr. Wood's application for a mobile home park.
/(Iy1h.fJy;;j;~~
S ndra Funke
~~' ~ ~,- ~ r:"
jt,......'.....~....... 11. i.'~ Ii -' ;-. Ll' W'. ."\\..."
'll" ......-.. , '
H' 'i.'~1
It " '3" J I
j'" J ,. ,
IL~ .l.' ! i I'~'
Of'S~~;~~)P,q
BOARD _=-.----
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22902.4596
(804) 296-5823
Ju y 14, 1993
Un"ted Land Corporation
AT Wendell Wood
P . . Box 5 548
Ch rlottesville, VA 22905
RE: ZMA-93-06 United. Land Corporation
SP-93-14 United. Land Corporation
Tax Map 32, Parcels 44, 45, 42A, 42B, 42C, 42D, and 42E and
Tax Map 46, Parcel 5
r Mr. Wood:
Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
y 13, 1993, by a vote of 4-3, recommended approval of the
ve-noted petitions to the Board of Supervisors. Please note
t ZMA-93-06 is subject to the following proffers:
1. The mobile home sales lot use will be limited to mobile home
sales and existing grocery store and gasoline sales.
2. The mobile home sales lot entrance will be closed or altered
if required by the future plan of development for the
remaining area designated office and regional service in the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The frontage on Route 29 containing Tax Map 32, Parcels 43A,
43, 42E, 42D, 42B, 42C, 42A and Tax Map 46, Parcel 5 shall
contain not more than three entrances. The County may
require closure of any existing entrances at the time of
establishment of any new entrances such that the total
number of entrances does not exceed three.
4. The site plan for the mobile home sales lot will not be
signed until the site plan for a minimum of 100 mobile home
units is signed.
Urited Land Corporation
Jlly 14, 1993
Pcge 3
5. An access road between the mobile home sales area and mobile
home park shall be developed at the time of establishment of
the mobile home sales use. This access road shall be used
only for the movement of mobile homes between the two uses
and for emergency access.
P~ease note that the Planning Commission recommended approval of
SI-93-14 with no conditions.
P~ease be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
will review this petition and receive public comment at their
mEeting on July 14, 1993. Any new or additional information
rEgarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the
Beard of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled
hEaring date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above
neted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
<v4~~/7
William D. Fritz
SEnior Planner
WIF/mem
cc: River Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership
Tom Muncaster
Amelia McCulley
Ella Carey
---.
./' f\ 'II .- i \Y ,q.,;2.. (2(\<
':'-h...> u'- !, i V ,..J1......d
Muncaster
Engineering &
Computer
Applications
338 Rio Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901 I I
804-978-7879
------
July 14, 1993
REOEIVED
JUL 1 4 1993
Planning Dept~
Mr. William D. Fritz, Senior Planner
De~ artment of Planning & Community Development
Alb~marle County
4 OJ McIntire Road
Chi: rlottesville, Virginia 22901
Re: Airport Mobile Home Park (ZMA-92-14, ZMA-93-06)
Dee r Mr. Fritz:
ThE following proffer is offered as a substitute to proffer #1 in
my letter of July 6, 1993 regarding this rezoning request:
The mobile home park is proffered for a period of not less
than 15 years from the start of development in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan. During that period of time, the
property shall not be available to any other R-15,
Residential uses except nothing contained herein shall
prohibit the Zoning Administrator from authorizing uses
deemed accessory and subordinate to the mobile home park. In
the event the conditions of SP-93-13 are not.. met, or at
the time of expiration of SP-93-13 in accordance with
Section 31.2.4.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant shall
permit the property to be rezoned to RA, Rural Areas by the
Board of Supervisors and thereafter the property shall enjoy
all RA uses. For the purposes of this proffer, the term
"start of development" is defined as the date of issuance of
the first mobile home building permit. Nothing herein shall
prohibit the Board of Supervisors from granting an extension
of the expiration date of SP-93-13 in accordance with Section
31.2.4.4 of the Zoning Ordinance.
WTI'/
Sincerely,
1J'~9L4
W. Thomas Muncaster, Jr., P.E.
[) c b,. 7/ RIB er.~
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCil
Protecting The Environment Is Everybody's BlIsiness
J ly 14,1993
STATEMENT REGARDING ZMA-93-06 & SP-93-14
Manufactured home display and sales
e Piedmont Environmental Council agrees with the Staff that the proposed
anufactured home storage, sales and display is inconsistent with the
omprehensive Plan, but we do not agree that it is so directly related to the proposal
f r a manufactured housing park nearby as to be distinguishable from any number
other commercial development proposals which may be made in the future.
seems to us that any commercial endeavor for which residents of the park would
vide a direct market would be equally "directly" related, Furthermore, anyone
'11 be able to buy a manufactured unit from the proposed sales facility--it 'will not
e restricted to residents of the park. In addition, prospective residents of the park
n buy their unit anywhere they want, including the manufactured housing sales
a d display just up the road on Route 29.
e of the central elements of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan which
rovided for the manufactured housing park and the 50 additional acres of
c mmercially designated land on which this proposal will be located was that any
c mmercial development of this land was first to be preceded by two events:
1 , Development of a minimum of 100 manufactured housing sites in the area
esignated along Route 606, and
2, Development and approval of a master plan which would guide
evelopment of the entire 50 acres to insure that it does not become another strip of
ighway commercial such as that which characterizes much of Route 29 already
either of these events have happened. The approval requested here, if granted,
ay set a precedent which will make it difficult for the County to enforce these
reconditions which are specifically detailed in the Comprehensive Plan,
or these reasons we oppose ZMA-93-06 & SP-93-14.
im Lindstrom, Director
harlottesville office
28-C Main Street, Box 460, Warrenton, Virginia 22186/703-347-2334/Fax 349-9003
1010 Harris Street, Suite 1, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903/804-977-2033
~l ~
~
A \993
......
BOARD Of SUPERV\SQRS
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
Ju Y 14, 1993
Un ted Land Corporation
AT Wendell Wood
P. . Box 5548
Ch rlottesville, VA 22905
RE ZMA-93-06 United Land Corporation
SP-93-14 United Land Corporation
Tax Map 32, Parcels 44, 45, 42A, 42B, 42C, 42D, and 42E and
Tax Map 46, Parcel 5
De r Mr. Wood:
Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
y 13, 1993, by a vote of 4-3, recommended approval of the
ve-noted petitions to the Board of Supervisors. Please note
t ZMA-93-06 is subject to the following proffers:
1. The mobile home sales lot use will be limited to mobile home
sales and existing grocery store and gasoline sales.
2. The mobile home sales lot entrance will be closed or altered
if required by the future plan of development for the
remaining area designated office and regional service in the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The frontage on Route 29 containing Tax Map 32, Parcels 43A,
43, 42E, 42D, 42B, 42C, 42A and Tax Map 46, Parcel 5 shall
contain not more than three entrances. The County may
require closure of any existing entrances at the time of
establishment of any new entrances such that the total
number of entrances does not exceed three.
4. The site plan for the mobile home sales lot will not be
signed until the site plan for a minimum of 100 mobile home
units is signed.
United Land Corporation
July 14, 1993
Page 3
5. An access road between the mobile home sales area and mobile
home park shall be developed at the time of establishment of
the mobile home sales use. This access road shall be used
only for the movement of mobile homes between the two uses
and for emergency access.
Please note that the Planning Commission recommended approval of
SP-93-14 with no conditions.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
will review this petition and receive public comment at their
meeting on July 14, 1993. Any new or additional information
regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled
hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above
noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
V~/7
William D. Fritz
Senior Planner
WDF/mem
cc: River Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership
Tom Muncaster
Amelia McCulley
Ella Carey
.
.
.
FF PERSON:
NING COMMISSION:
OF SUPERVISORS:
,7/'/ /J3
(""
lJ {'!t.+J+Z2 '"i--'f23
IE n w mW"1
'I}
(" J1' 9 ~]/I
@OARO OF SUPEF;::-1 i
-~
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
JULY 13, 1993
JULY 14, 1993
UNITED LAND CORPORATION
UNITED LAND CORPORATION
Z -93-06 United Land Cor oration - Proposal to rezone 7.9 acres
from RA, Rural Areas to HC, Highway Commercial (proffered) on
property described as Tax Map 32, Parcels 43 and 43A located on
t e west side of Rt. 29 approximately 600 feet south of
Ti berwood Boulevard. (The following additional parcels are
affected by the proposed road network: Tax Map 32, Parcels 44,
45, 42A, 42B, 42C, 42D and 42E and Tax Map 46, Parcel 5 to remain
z ned RA, Rural Areas, but with proffers). The site is in the
Rivanna Magisterial District and is located in a designated
growth area (Community of Hollymead) recommended for Regional
Service.
SP-93-14 United Land Cor oration - Proposal to establish outdoor
storage and display and sales of mobile homes [30.6.3.2 (6 & 7)]
o 7.9 acres zoned RA, Rural Areas and EC, Entrance Corridor
(Z A-93-06 is pending on this site). Property, described as Tax
M p 32, Parcels 43 and 43A, is located on the west side of Rt. 29
a proximately 600 feet south of Timberwood Boulevard in the
Rivanna Magisterial District. This site is located the Community
of Hollymead and recommended for Regional Service.
aracter of the Area: This parcel is currently occupied by a
elling and a general market. (There are three dwellings on
rcel 43 which are not proposed for rezoning and are shown to be
ded to an adjacent parcel.)
licant's Pro osal: The applicant is proposing to rezone
proximately 7.9 acres to Highway Commercial and establish
bile home sales. The general market will remain as will the
e isting residential structure which will be used for a sales
office. A private connection between the mobile home sales and
t e proposed mobile home park is shown on the plans submitted for
review. The applicant has submitted proffers.
S Y AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has reviewed these requests
for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose and
i tent of the Zoning Ordinance and Section 30.6 (Entrance
Corridor Overlay District). Staff is recommending approval of
t is request only if the rezoning and special use permit for the
1
.
.
.
ile home park are approved (ZMA-92-l4 and SP-93-13). Without
roval of the request for the mobile home park staff, staff is
ble to support this request.
SP-158 was approved to allow the expansion of the
omprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) affecting this area was
roved by the Board of Supervisors on October 7, 1992. The
d Use Map and recommendation adopted by the Board is included
Attachment D in the accompanying report for ZMA-92-14 and SP-
13 (the Airport Mobile Home Park).
rehensive Plan: The CPA calls for an overall plan to be
roved prior to development of the commercial area. Also, the
ercial area development is intended to occur after
elopment of the minimum 100 mobile home sites. Therefore, on
face, the sales area development is inconsistent with the
prehensive Plan. However, the sales area use is directly
ated to the mobile home park development and therefore is
sidered appropriate for development prior to an overall plan
development of the rest of the area. Any further development
change in use in the regional service area would require a
elopment plan.
CPA limits access to the regional service area to three
ations. A proffer limiting access to three points and calling
the relocation/deletion of the existing entrance are
vided.
s
COMMENT :
This request has been reviewed by the Architectural Review Board
(A B) (Attachment C) which stated in part:
1. That the use of this property as a sales site for mobile
homes can be accommodated through site design as indicated
in the staff report.
2. That the application plan for the proposed commercial ~:oning
(as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment approved on
this site by the Board of supervisors), should be submitted
and reviewed in its entirety prior to approving the portion
of the area to be rezoned currently proposed as the mobile
home sales area.
2
.
.
.
WhOle an overall plan of development for the commercial area has
no been submitted, the applicant has submitted proffers intended
to address the concerns of the Comprehensive Plan. (Specifically
th number of entrances on Route 29.) Staff has previously
st ted that this request is being reviewed under the assumption
th t the mobile home park has been approved. Mobile home sales
ma be considered as supportive of the mobile home park and it is
fo this reason only that staff has supported this request at
th"s time.
Y AND RECOMMENDATION:
s
perties to the north and east of this site are currently zoned
ercial. The request for mobile home sales is by special use
mit only due to outdoor storage and display within the EC
trict and final ARB approval will be required prior to final
n approval. Staff is able to support the zoning map amendment
special use permit as it is supportive of the mobile home
k. Any alternative commercial use of the commercial area must
ur only after 100 mobile home units are in place and an
rall plan of development for the commercial area has been
roved.
ff recommends approval of ZMA-93-06 subject to the acceptance
the applicant's proffers listed below:
1.
The mobile home sales lot use will be limited to mobile home
sales and existing grocery store and gasoline sales.
2. The mobile home sales lot entrance will be closed or altered
if required by the future plan of development for the
remaining area designated office and regional service in the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The frontage on Route 29 containing Tax Map 32, Parcels 43A,
43, 42E, 42D, 42B, 42C, 42A and Tax Map 46, ParcelS shall
contain not more than three entrances. The County may
require closure of any existing entrances at the time of
establishment of any new entrances such that the total
number of entrances does not exceed three.
4. The site plan for the mobile home sales lot will not be
signed until the site plan for a minimum of 100 mobile home
units is signed.
5. An access road between the mobile home sales area and mobile
home park shall be developed at the time of establishment of
the mobile home sales use. This access road shall be used
only for the movement of mobile homes between the two uses
and for emergency access.
3
.
.
.
No conditions of approval are needed for the special use permit.
St~ff does recommend approval of SP-93-14.
ATrACHMENTS:
A Location Map
B Tax Map
C Architectural Review Board Letter
4
\. (. ! --
( ..., I, ~ ('
"')' ~\.
/'K'\" " ~'lTACHMENT A
/ \~:". ,'~ ~~:l.)-:'
:. \ __c',~
:'~~;)~ ' "\",,,~':j;/ ''',~;:~:!~r~~ ~----
, ' "'y " " :=' .." __"YJ . "i;1-
",;iy:: ,; : ~".-.:nn.' <"'/-<.....:" - ~''':<,~.'..^
/" I ,; . I ' .' "" " . C'
~ ' .' .. ", . -' I: 7'.'
, SP 93-14 ,', "\ .. ':cS ' ' 0";'--"/")':' ';:" ;,.
Unlted Land C \ JI ~ __h_~/_:' 7\ \ Ii' ,,-: / .,"' ~ G,,_
/I," Orp, -- '. " . I ' . ,':' .,.' "
X.~.---...... ..... .}_C'....~ .; '/' - . .- ~;:..(--'- >-.:'" I,; ..:" '..
.-/P~,'1 \ ' ' , -- ..
.// ,_' ,~ ,.' '" \ ,__; l' ' '
._ __ :;~;.~\' ' "n, '~> " ,__ ,.,-1" ~ " ., \ '?N ---- . . '
.. ,'" ~~' _ / ,. /', I . mn ",,,", "
, ' \,,,, ,Y;-~... ~...'.,)f r! (. i~'
..~.-__~., ." ',;-:.<'"H) . .'\ " " I .. ,--/'\~; '. ,',' ,.; ":c
~\ <c;~n' ~r ~<A'f/ /~._:\~. ':'\'"
n; , ",,",'-., ~c\ : ') . n \' '" \' ,\-.;:. /~.~~>;; "
_ . ," ~.".,,:~~_ . lei;, r.i(~"'r.\v: j , / ";."),,, / G,' ','
,,', .-F : ";''-~;'"'''' : : "", ",.~l ~' . ~ /#' 1 ,;:.,- . : ".
- .'{_n7-'" .~.:z, '~'f<-"- -/ .-.. ,,~ ;'-:~.: """j:..\:"-"~-~
,~ _ " ;. r:C : n ___.,' f ,\,"" Of'
\___n"~' i--' : ..",," . /' ,:~.'.
~=>' .- ~ ..f"'',.j.' '" N J' ," '.
',>. . 'I' [~ ' "",,,' / :
'~" .' .,'. ,I, J ~ ......./' :
I~_:;;'><~< " ;:;-ZS;,0~<: / '
r {~),~':~/~~/~/;;::"~_':';Z5l~---~'/:
~~_~"-;-., j" ,,' . _ 'l- f~ ---\/:-c:~,:'~'\'
.,,", To......~ I \c y/:....a aa ,.V..,J..'. ,__~' (~:,~,1
''\C;;;0.~~f-''(J 'I' /uuu,:.m ~u,um,: :'1\ I":~;;,~,'~.
c"",.S... _..' -JOe ....".. JO' ~'::\ ;'..._' '/' ~ r ' /..- ~~J ~' ..:~::2~
! ~ ,O2 _~. '....,._.~. '.c'_. ~..:.c. ./... / c. ( 1 ,"" "" ", r-s:= ~..'
.0" ..' " " .a. . "..' >c, ." '"' "m
'C.- ~ !'>\'''0.l.,;~ 5 .' /~/.. '/. -: Z' . . _..::..' 'I ~(' ',~//). ",.
~~:, ',_' _ ' ~" _.,,'. ~ / ' :: '--'-1f 0,/, ,v ~.
I . - -, -' ! - . /.. ,.' '" '
I' a, f'''' ,," '"' / /' ","'.' ",a' " r- ',.".
C;/. ./'-0' / 'r,"" \ . em;
j ,. ".. \, T)~--" t Jf ;-\ ~' E;;\ \ ~ (:,,'j
!;!'l.'./,~'i'-4'~K\~~;::t;',/~\=.,./ .' ./,/(/ <" G." '(;>'';\ ~.-x~}/~?/
; ",..' ,- ' ' .,.. ,/, " -
, ' --, ' -- ' -- ,'''' '
.'"'' .. '.,_' ~''-'-f''') , (.. 1/.
a" ! ;,',';' .' .,,,\/ ..."" '" \)'~
< ..... \. ".';'7 ",e" '. V ",,'/"
," ' J>' ~ ,'I \ -- '1 ,., /' ".
'fl/~~-J,' ',;,' / ,~,' / Q 0~"
,. ~ L
!
~J
'--...
,
~:: "
,. \0
-, ... \~ ) ...
:t '~I .v'\10
c.? \.~'~ / ' . ....
~'J,-(. .
..~_'Xr.'iO''''''
'\'
.. ",,"'C')"e,,","
~\
,.. -'-~'
~-
"
\
\,
\
I
I
'~.'-....
J
\ .
I
/
/
----
-----,--~
,
,,-~
"\
1--
'"-- ..
8
y~ ,'" A'ITACHMENT B
'"
~,
'---
=
/~//
-J
'7
~
, ~
/
'"
'"
10
,0C
'00
'oC
"0
,OH
,OI
'0.
10l
ZMA-93-06
United Land Corp.
z
2~
.___l___
, 0 "
ZMA-92-l4
Wendell W:x:x:l
.
.
.
A'ITACHMENT C
v:"" ,':'-
F<i l{""'" !~. .<:.,..... !:~,. II F."" r-:>
~ i:;.;:g r~ ;or r~~ ,-.'. \ tl ~.:--w t':: f
t:r ~~~iJ~ii 6 ~LJ
COUNTY OF ALBE:>lARLE
Department of Zoning
~Ol >1clntire Road
Char;ct,esvii!e, Virginia 22901-4596
(8041 296-5875
:\pIJ 'l 2 'Qu~
1-'" n c.. II I..,)
,..., i . .-"
;;....'. 1 r:, 'In l'""l! n 1"1. \\ e .....f.J. J.,
~ i a. 'i I IU U . l.
'-'
April 20, 1993
TOITl Muncaster
Muncaster Engi:-ieer:ng
338 W. Rio Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Re: AR.3-P~SDP)-93-05 Airpert I,fetile Home Sales
Tax Map 32 Parcels 43 end 43A
Dear 1,,1r. 1'.y1uncaster:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting
on April 19, 19S'3. The ARB recornmended the following to the Board of Supervisors:
1) That the use of this property as a sales site for mobile homes eeI1 be
accommod::.ted through site design as i;1dicated in the staff report, a...'1d
2) Tl:at the application plan for the proposed commercicJ. zO;1ing (as outlined
in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment approved on this site by the Board
of Supervisors), should be submitted and reviev,;ed in its ent~.rety prior to
apprc'.;ing the portion of the area t-J be rezor.ed currently pre-posed as the
ftlobile home s32es a~e3..
The staff report c2.ted April 19, 1993 suggests the site plan fOl" the mobile !lO:1"je sales area on
this site can be accGn~J:1odated if the plan for the site illustrates the following:
1) It provides a sense of org2.I1iz3.tion to the site in locating the pavement and mobile homes
in a har:1jo:1i:Jus juxtapcsitiof: with the existing building;
)) It reduces fle 2n-:CLr.t 8f paveser.t visible to the. Ent:-aI1cc Cc:-ridor;
It visu2.11y mitigates the expanse 0:- pavement by breaking it up by USln~: vegetatior:,
walls, fences or auangement of the n-jobile homes on the site,;
ATI'ACHMENT C PAGE 2
~.... . t
f.,
.
Airport IAobiie Home Sales
Ap;-il 20, 1993
4) It provides a visual continuity on the site by anchoring the building to the site by using
vegetation, wal:s, fences or a:-rangement sf the mobile homes on the site; and
5) It provides a trz.Esitio;; from the more commercial sites to the north to the more rural
si tes to th e so u :~l.
If you have 2..!1] quesIions concerriing any of the above please call me,
Sincerel y ,
\
~" n\ r "/'>- \ -
\ \) Ii jJLL;.,__ 02-'-......-------
. ~'\. .
, '---.-/
lv:iarcia Joseph
Design Plzuiner
1',1J
..
('^ .
-.v,
Bill F:itz
VVendall \\1 ood
TiITI LindstrOITl
.
2
-.-,.r '"
Revenue sharing Projects
AGENDA DATE:
July 7, 1993
\~I~J@ ~~~~ [
lU\l ~ '-
~OARDOF~RS\
ITEM NUMBER:
c?j t 7v;~ 363
,,;. .", "(J~"f.' AH'\tE.
'IN~~~~~ d =__.
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMAR Y
SUBJECT
Recommen
local m
sharing
ACTION: X
level of
road revenue
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes (
-
STAFF CO
Messrs.
Cilimberg
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGRO
During the FY 93-94 CIP process, the Board appropriated $276,734 for road revenue sharing
projects with the understanding at the time that this amount might be insufficient if the
state a proved the Board's request for the full allocation of $500,000. VDOT has since
approved $424,300 in revenue sharing for FY 93-94 projects, thus requiring an additional
appropri tion of $147,566 if the Board wished to pull down the full amount.
DISCUSSI
The Pla ning Department has reported that although VDOT has made $424,300 available to
Albemarl County, they have also indicated that two of the 93-94 proposed road projects on
the reve ue sharing list, Route 678 and Route 682, will not be ready for construction until
FY 94-95. Therefore, even at the current local funding share of $276,734, there will be an
excess f $44,234 in local funds for eligible revenue sharing projects. A list of the
proposed projects is attached.
In lieu f these two delayed projects, the one eligible revenue sharing project that could
be comp eted in 93-94 is the development of landscaping on the Route 250 East project.
Revenue sharing funds can be used on primary road projects and can be used towards
landscaping projects related to projects identified in the primary road plan. Route 250 East
will be ompleted this fiscal year and there is a landscape plan approved for this project.
The tota amount estimated for the landscaping project is $85,800, which would be more than
covered y the excess local funds of $44,234 or a total funding amount of $88,468.
RECOMME
For the above that two previously identified road projects, Route 678 and Route
682, wil not be ready for construction in the FY 93-94 project year and that no other other
eligible road projects will be ready with the exception of the Route 250 East landscaping
project, staff recommends that the current local appropriation of $276,734 be maintained.
This will enable the County to complete the Route 250 landscaping project, which had been
requeste in the FY93-94 elP, but will not require any further appropriation of local funds
to pull own the additional $147,566 in state funds.
93.085
../ ..
-
<(
I-
Z
w
:E
J:
U
~
l-
S
NI
-
C>
....1
..
:;;:
...
~
eo _
- -
'" C>
~~~I~
... ......M......
<:> 0\....
;:::;: c'd
~===~
-.. .0
~... ..-<
~ ..:
<ll
..-<
..-<
.....
>
III
.... ~
<ll
0.
<ll
0.
..-<
:3
U
-
.... ~
~ =
...
- ~
~
... ..
...
~ I
.. ....
!iE:
i-::~ z
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --..
~6I~
.. ..
_ ......
eog
~
-- -- -- -l--~-~-- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
c:: ... 00
<II c::
......... .....
<ll..-<-o
-0 <II <ll
..... ... <ll
:J III III
c::
>,.....
... III
c:: <ll c::
:3 0. 00 :J :J:J:J
o ..... ..... <ll <ll <ll OJ
Uo.lIl Z Z Z Z
; E -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----
- ~
...,-
.... .... ---
:: - .t:.
- -
-
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----
..
:;;<->
.. ...
....g
~-=
--
....
... ...~
...--
....--
0_ 00....
.. --
-~
Z
Z
;
Z
Z
Z
....
~
....
o
~
....
o
o
>
....
o
~
....
o
~
!
....
o
~
><
.....
;l:
><
.....
;l:
><
.....
;l:
><
.....
;l:
.
...
!l <II
III
c:: U) c::
0 ... 0
..... c::.....
... OJ'"
u a <II
OJ <ll U
U) > 0
c:: .... 0"-<
00 OJ ....
..... ... 0.0
..-< c:: e :J
<II I-l .....I.&.J
...
c::
<II
..-<
p..
...
c::
11l
..-<
p..
...
c::
<II
..-<
p..
...
c::
<II
..-<
p..
;
;><
;><
;><
;><
;><
;><
Z
j; j T~-- -- -, -~'~'~ -- -- n'~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ,- ~-~' ~- n -- - ~~' n n,-i ~'~"
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -'='_~_!!l__ __ __.!:: _~ _~ __ ~ _": _": __ ~_ ~ ~ __ __' _.:"_ ~_ __ __ __~_ ~_ ~_,
., -
~:
... ...
... ...
....
Z
Z
Z
Z
..:
Z
lI"'I
0\
(")
lI"'I
lI"'I
0\
.j
.j
(")
00
0\
-cJ
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----
. ..
~:.
-
III
00
c::
..........-:
.ooc::........ 0 0\ '0\
t::~~~~ t::~~ t::~~ t::~~ I
.... -- -.. .. - .... -- -- .... -- -- .... .... -- -- -... .... - - .... .. - .... .... -- .. - .... -.. .... ....
..:
Z
... 0
e<: ...
o
"'Oll"'l
e<:"'N
.j
"'000
e<:...-cJ
...
.... ..
~:::::
~ ... .=::
-~ ...
.. ...
... 0'"
e<:...-cJ
..:
Z
o
N
00
-cJ
o
N
~
~
lI"'I
N
o
N
.. .... .. - .... .... .... -- ....--
,
ZO ...
o . lI"'I e<: -0
"';l:N c::
. 11l ..c:
00 ......00
U"'\NU C:OC"'"
N . e<: I-l.j I-l ::c
.. -- -- -- -_ __ __r::!_ __.
...
U)
7
....
00
....
- - ;- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - - - - --
::: .~-
iD"" 0 "- 0 00 0
~~~ ~,...., \D lr'l N C .-4
':;
o
-- :: -- -- .... -- .... .... .... ...... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - --
.... .. ~
.....,,-
...~-
~~~
....:- ~ ~ >- ~ >-
- ....
=~:;s
::lI._ ...
--
--:: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----
:::::
'- .... CI
~ ..
00__ C""l C"'1 C"""l M
.- -
~ co
... .-
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --..- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----
... 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
- ., 0 lI"'I lI"'I 0 O'
.-"",-
... ..-
... .. - 0 N .... .... lI"'I
~- lI"'I N (") (") ....
...
-- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- ----
.. 0 0 0 0 0
.::: 0 0 0 0 0
-~ ~ u;. lI"'I 0 0
.. ~
=~~ 0 N .... .... lI"'I
.. ..
...~ .,., N (") C"'l ....
~
<->
o
.. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --..
Z
----- -- -- ---------
i'
N
-
----- ..------------
o
o
.,.,
N
(")
.. -- --........- -- -- -- --..
o
o
lI"'I
N
(")
~ i ~ -- -~' n n _~n n -, n -- '~ -- -- n ~ n -- -- ~ -- ,- -- ~ ~t' -, -- -- 'fn m,
"- .., - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 __
~~.g. 6 J. ~ rl, r1 cb ~~
~.: g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~u
<Xl 0 0 0 0 0 0
..-/ .
N1
...
co
NI
-
."
~
~ :::
- -
Il::l>U..;t ~
:: ;;':'13
:E~
~.. l1)
-00 .-<
-- '"'
~E:::~
~... QJ
~ -D
.-<
..;
QJ
.-<
.-<
....
>
Ul
QJ
'"' ....
QJ ....
0- e
QJ .-<
0- '"'
.-< '"
:l .<:
u u
- ....
u 5
-
-
.,. :::
;;: -
J
~ I
- ..,
!i~
....... ....
~:=--~--------~
"
-....
-
f->
o
~
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -. -. -- -- -- -. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---.
~
.... ...
... u "
" co
_ "....
-g
-
,- -- ,nr----' --!, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----
" ..
.... - ~
~.g ~ .c
" .. t>O
-- tl)C
.-< ....
'" Ul
c: Ul
t>Oe
.... '"'
V) U
-. -.; -- -. -- -- -- ---
==-
0..... ..,
=='::~ ~ ..
- -
-
-. -- -- -- -- -. -- ---
..,
.. u ~
~.!:~ z
.~: !:..
-.=
~~ ~--I~-~-~----~
IS _ ell ^_ ~ CI)
:-: __:: __:-'_ __ __ ___t
:: :-:
~:
.- ..
u _
-
-- -- -- -. -- -. -. -.-
U'l
.-<
-
:: ..
.:::....
~ ~
'"'
>( '"'
V) '"
-- -- -- -- ~ ~ -- ---~
...
.., co
~ ....-
~ ,,~
~....::
....-::=
'"
-
-----------------
u
.- u
~ Go'_
co ... _
~::-
"
..;
z
-- ------ ---- -----
...
-=..::;
.., "" --
!::=
- ..
- ..,
=~=
:::6._ ....
... -
>-
-----------------
...
- -
~ u
.- - -
... -
.~-"A:
... co
-,-
o
N
c:
t>O
....
......
'"
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- ---- -- -- ---. -. -- -- -- ----
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -------- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- ---- -- -- ----
~
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -. -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- ---- -- -- -- ------.
-- -- -- -- -- -. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
~
r
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
V) ....
, e . co
ii ...:c....
0....
'" .....
N-O:
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---.
.
u
<
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --)
-- -- - - - - -- - - -- -- -- - -...- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- - - -- -- -- -- ----
.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ..- -- -- --.
(
: ~ -- -- .~- - -- - - -~ -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - --
._~-
~=:=: 0 .
~ ... '" "
'""
~~ ---- -~- -- -- -; -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -------- --------
~ "'~
:~~ ~
U-g
~
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----
-
=~-=
~~-
._""~
" co ..
~-...
- ..,
... '"
" -
V)
I
N
o
o
I
r--
N
'"
o
-- -- -- -- - - .- -- -- -- ---
.
- -- -. -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --r-.-'
.....
o
V)
z
County/State Agreement
Project # 0250-002-R05,L801
Albemarle County
TillS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 14thday of July , 19~
and between the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF
SPORTATION (hereinafter referred to as the "Department") and THE BOARD OF
UNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA (hereinafter referred to as
"County").
WHEREAS, the County, by Resolution dated 7/14/9.)has requested that the Department
es blish a project for the landscaping of the newly widened segment of Route 250, and that
bemarle County general funds and state matching funds, pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1 of the
f V. i. (hereinafter referred to as the "Re.venue Sharing Fund"), be utilized in this
~ect's fmancing; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Viq~inia, Albemarle County's
g neral funds ($44,234) and state matching funds ($44,234) have been designated in the approved
Fi cal Year 1993-94 Revenue Sharing Program for Albemarle County; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to subsection B of Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Viq~inia, both
ies have concurred in the County's general administration of this improvement; and
WHEREAS, both parties wish to determine the manner of performing the work, the timing
o the work to be performed, and the responsibility of each party;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of mutual covenants herein specified to be
t and performed, it is agreed by the parties hereto as follows:
A. The project is defined as the landscaping along the newly widened segment
of Route 250 from the eastern corporate limits to the Route 64 Interchange.
This improvement shall be designated as Project Number 0250-002-
R05,L801
B. The County shall:
1. Arrange for any necessary survey and design of the improvement. In the
event such survey and/or design necessitates the services of personnel other
than employees of the County, the selection of such services shall be
administered in accordance with applicable provisions of the Virginia Public
Procurement Act. All necessary costs involved shall be considered a part of
eligible project costs. Cost estimates, and related contract documents shall
be presented to the Department for approval prior to commencement of
project construction. Plans and specifications, if required, shall be presented
to the Department for approval prior to commencement of the improvement.
These plans and specifications shall specifically identify the contract items
and the estimated quantity of each such item. Any such item(s) not eligible
for financing from the Revenue Sharing Fund shall be so designated on the
plans.
2. Prescribe that all items of work and material for this improvement will be in
compliance with applicable Department standards and specifications.
3. Prepare any required environmental documents and secure any applicable
permits necessary for this improvement.
4. Prior to commencement of construction on any portion of this improvement
within the right-of-way of road(s) currently a part of the state maintained
system of highways, secure a highway permit from the Department tor such
work.
5. In accordance with the plans, specifications and related documents approved
pursuant to paragraph C(3), construct the project with County forces or
administer the project by letting it to contract through the County's
competitive bidding procedures in accordance with the Virginia
Procurement Act. No contractor currently disqualified from bidding on
contracts with the Department because of collusion or any matter relating to
violation of State or Federal Anti-Trust Law may participate, either as a
prime contractor, subcontractor, or supplier, in any part of this improvement.
6. Be responsible for the appropriate inspection and testing of the improvement
to assure compliance with the Department's standards and specifications.
The cost of such inspection shall be an eligible project expense.
7. Make the project available for review by the Department personnel during
its construction; make fmal inspection jointly with the Department upon
completion of the improvement; and obtain the Department's concurrence in
the project's acceptance.
8. Maintain accurate records of all project costs in a form satisfactory to the
Department and make such records available for review and financial audit
by the Department upon request.
9. Provide a total of $44,234 of County funds to finance eligible project
expenses, which shall be qualified for $44,234 of State matching funds to
fmance eligible project expenses in accordance with the approved Revenue
Sharing Program for Albemarle County and pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1 of
the Code of Virginia. Eligible and ineligible project expenses include costs
associated with any claim that may arise during the construction phase that
the Commissioner or Department or court of competent jurisdiction may
decide is due. '
10. Provide from County funds for the fmancing of any ineligible project costs
and all eligible project costs in excess of$88,468.
11. Present the Department with proper certification of all costs incurred and
paid and billing for its share (not to exceed the lesser of $44,234 or 50%) of
the total actual cost incurred in the design and construction of the project's
eligible items, as herein prescribed, upon acceptance of the project pursuant
to paragraphs B (8) and C (6). Monthly progress billings may be submitted
prior to final acceptance once the County's $44,234 share has been
expended. Such billings shall be payable by the Department within 30 days
of receipt, in accordance with paragraph C (7).
C. The Department shall:
1. Provide the County all design and cost estimate data currently available
relative to this project.
2. Upon request, provide to the County an up-to-date list of the Contractors
disqualified by the Department.
3. Review the plans and specifications, if required, and related contract
documents presented by the county pursuant to paragraph B (1), and
approve them with whatever modifications, if any, it deems appropriate.
4. Upon application by the County, pursuant to paragraph B (4), issue a permit
for this improvement. This permit shall be in accordance with applicable
provisions of the Department's <<urrent "Land Use Permit Manual", "Road
Design and Standards Manual", and "Road and Bridge Specifications",
which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. No fee Of bond
will be required in the issuance of this permit.
5. Arrange for the adjustment of any utilities ip. conflict with the improvement.
Administration of such utilitY adjustment shall be in conformance with
applicable VDOT requirements. Costs of such adjustments that are
determined eligible for fmancing from funds administered by the
Department, may be considered a part of eligible project costs.
6. Make a final inspection with the County upon completion of the
improvement, and if approved, concur in the project's acceptance.
7. Upon fmal acceptance of the project and receipt of County's invoices,
pursuant to the provisions of paragraph B (12), reimburse the County in an
amount not to exceed 50% of the actual cost of eligible items. However, in
no case shall the total of such reimbursement, including progress payments,
exceed $44,234. All eligible costs in excess of $88,468 and any ineligible
project costs shall be borne solely by the County pursuant to the provisions
of paragraph B (11). Any such progress payment or reimbursement shall be
payable by the Department within 30 days of submission by the County.
8. Administer any claim that might be filed in conformance with applicable
specifications and statutes.
D, This project may be terminated by either party upon at least 90 days prior written
notice. All eligible costs incurred up to the date of termination shall be considered a
part of the project costs, and these costs shall be shared in accordance with
paragraph C (7).
K Both parties pledge to make every effort to ensure commencement of this project at
the earliest possible date.
THIS AGREEMENT, when properly executed, shall be binding upon both parties, their
su cessors, and assigns.
THIS AGREEMENT may be modified in writing by mutual agreement of both parties.
IN WI1NESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has caused this Agreement to be executed in
tri licate in its name and on behalf of its duly authorized officer as of the day, month, and year first
he ein written.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
A EST:
BY:
Commissioner
Title
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
By:{AJ(~ -7-~
Chairman
-~
Edward H. B in, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvi e
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO Board of Supervisors
FR Ella W. Carey, Clerk fic:C
DA July 9, 1993
SU Reading List for July 14, 1993
Ap ill, 1992 - pages 34 (#15b) - end - Mr. Marshall
Ap i1 8, 1992 - All - Mr. Bain
Oc ober 14, 1992 - All - Mr. Bowerman
Fe ruary 17, 1993 - All - Mr. Marshall
EW :mms
*
Printed on recycled paper
r'. i q J".:;a
'i / >';.,1
, 1/..
Cj0Lf'7N. LfZ';
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
. .
...
Edward H. Bai , Jr.
Samuel Mille
David P. Bowe man
Charlottesvil\
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
ScotlsvHle
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
July 19, 1993
M . Charles M. Rotgin, Jr.
3 5 Terrell Road W
C arlottesville, VA 22901
_/J _jJ,.
D ~~~~iR: ~
I happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors,
o your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This
C ittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of
A bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I
h ve attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone
n ers for your information. The facilitator of the committee will contact you
r garding the meeting schedule. Future meetings will be coordinated through the
D partment of Planning and Community Development. I encourage you to bring your
c 1endars to this first meeting.
r your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in
nitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee
follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for
ur interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status
ports as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not
sitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me shou.ld you
ve any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction.
Sincerely,
(/)~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/jng
BDS&COMM\FISIMPCT.COM
At achments
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
(?s: (?~ ~ :;_
r ~
cad' ~
r 7 J - V/ YO.
a
*
Printed on recycled paper
,-
FISCAL IMP ACT COMMITTEE
NAM FA~ AND ADDRESS APPOINTED TERM EXPIRES CITY/COUNCIL
Mrs. Ellen 1. Andersen 06-03-92 Planning Commission
2620 Kimt rough Circle (Samuel Miller)
Charlottes, ille, Va 2290 I
(H) 293-9C 74
Mr. A. Bfl ~ce Dotson 06-03-92 Citizen
2282 Whir R>oorwill Road
Charlottes, ille, Va 22901
(H) 979-7C 74 (W) 924-1970
Mr, Peter tJ. Hallock 06-03-92 Citizen
P.O. Box 38
Keswick, , a 22947
(H) 293-67 :04 (W) 973-4402
Mrs. Char ptte Y. Humphris 06-03-92 Board of Supervisors
109 Falcon Drive (Colthurst) (Jack Jouett)
Charlottes~ ille, Va 22901
(H) 296-78 06
Mr. Charlt: s R. Rotgin, Jr. 07-14-93 Citizen (Replaced B.
305 Terrell Road West Hurt)
Charlottes" 'lIe, Va 22901
(H) 296-89 ~6 (W) 296-4141
Mr. Tim L ndstrom 06-03-92 Citizen
Route 7, B px 228
Charlottesv lIe, Va 22901
(W) 977- 2( 33
Mr. Forres R. Marshall, J r. 06-03-92 Board of Supervisors
Route 6, B ~x 305A (Scottsville)
Charlottesv lIe, Va 22901
(H) 295-70 B8 (W) 293-8111
Mr. Jay Ml Neely 06-03-92 Citizen
Route 1, B px 547
Crozet, Va 22932
(H) 823-23 1>5
Mr. Willicu n J. Nitchmann 06-03-92 Planning Commission
P.O. Box 2 ~78 (Scottsville)
Charlottesv lIe, Va 22902
(H) 296-41 1)4 (W) 293-4765
.
FIS tAL IMP ACT COMMITTEE (CONTINUED)
N1\M lES AND ADDRESS APPOINTED TERM EXPIRES CITY/COUNCIL
Mr. Denn s S. Rooker 06-03-92 Citizen
115 S. p3J ~tops Drive
Charlottes wille, V A 22901
(H) 973-4 ~74 (W) 977-7424
Mr. Mich ~el K. Semanik 06-03-92 Citizen
404 WestI rtoreland Court
Charlottes f1ille, V A 2290 I
(H) 974-6 ~20 (W) 978-7442
. .
. --"--. ~--_._------...-.--.-
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE
REcommended Work outline:
Geal: To develop a fiscal impact analysis methodology that;
. incorporates all planning and growth factors
relevant to Albemarle County's current and future
growth management;
. can be validated, creditable and flexible;
. is effective in supporting review of policy issues;
. is usable and maintainable by staff;
. is fully supported and integrated with the
comprehensive plan review process; and
. is completed no later than March, 1993.
Sl)ecific Responsibilities for the Committee are:
(1)
Coordinate information collection and issues
identification before model development--receive public
input.
Review base input to model--demographic, value of real
estate, capital facility costs, etc.--with consultant.
(2)
(3)
(4)
Receive and review final model product.
Identify various land use/economic scenarios for model
application--although optional, this is a desirable
effort for the committee to undertake because it
validates the model and bridges the initial issues
identification with the model's application and provides
a foundation of tested scenarios for use by the Planning
commission and Board of Supervisors in making
policy/strategy decisions.
TIMELINE:
M.rch/Anril 1992:
I Committee selection and Formulation of Tasks
- Develop the issues and charge for the Committee
- Advertise and select Committee
MHV/June. 1992:
I. orientation, Information Gathering, Issue Identification
- Review current policies and practices
. ~
<- -<
0> ~
~ f1)
!Ii l{:
~ rt
~ ~
fIJ
~ rt
:g f1)
V41il
-.
~
a:
rt
~
rt
':r
f1)
f1)
0>
..,
.:(
"S-
O>
fIJ
III
o
....
rt
':r
f1)
::l
~
rt
..,
f1)
~.
~
o
....
rt
':r
f1)
n
~
..,
f1)
~
f1)
i
-.
<
f1)
-0
QI
~
fIJ
o
':r
a.
c
a.
rt
o
li'
..,
::l
QI
....
rt
f1)
..,
..
~-----_4--
~ ~
iT
Ii"
a:
~
~
rt
f1)
--------
raa~l g;
~ ~ ~
QI QI -
.., .., -.
~~~
..o:n ...~
L888J
C) C) C)
---
I-------~
V4~
..0..0
88
C) C)
"3
~
i:
CII
-----
....
II
... ~
!
1-----
IA
lit
VI
-
C)
C)
C)
~ ~ i
c ..,
o;:;~
~ ~ II
..... rt -
,... Ul
.... rt
..... QI
....
...
---
....
ji'
i
--- ----
N
i i
.., ...
... ...
... 9
I ~
-----
g
rt
':r
fIJ
N
!~
- ~
I ~,
9
- .
c
~
~
rt
':r
fIJ
[
o
.
.
- - - - -I- - - -I-- - - --
C)
C)
C)
i.~
rt _
rt ...
_:I _~
Ul
rt
QI
...
....
-----
n II) S'
~ i I
c ~ ..,
- - ...
rt ...
~ II
rt _
,.,
~ ~ ~
CT III ~
- ...
-. ...
o .
~
- li' "II
i i& ..,
;...5
~H
J
...
0-
g
rt
~
II>
-----
~
!i!1
.... :!. g
\ a ~,
~
~
::l
rt
':r
fIJ
~
'8 li' m
:;, i& i
~f n'
~
::l
rt
~
(/)
- - - - _L _ _ _L _ _ __
----
1Il
n
,..
r-
X
-0
,..
n
-<
,..
z:
,..
r-
-<
Ul
1Il
n
~
-0
-0 ::0
r- m
,.. :x:
z: m
z:
1Il
<
m
----
"II
[
f
...
~
i
g;'
';;!
i
n'
f
f
~
~o
i