HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-11-04
FINAL
9:00 A.M.
November 4, 1992
Room 7, County Office Building
YOUTH- IN-GOVERNMENT DAY
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) Approval of Minutes: December 11, 1991 and August 5, 1992.
7) Highway Matters.
a) Discussion: Millington Bridge (Route 671), draft let.ter to Ray
Pethtel (deferred from October 14, 1992).
b) Other Highway Matters.
8) Request for Resolution of Intent to rezone Tax Map 76, Parcel 17 A
(Department of Forestry property) from R-1 to CO. '
9) Request to amend the Albemarle County Service Authority service area
boundaries for "water only" to Tax Map 79, Parcels 18 & 19 for David
W. Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum (Goco, Inc.).
10) Discussion: Fast Track Building Permit Issuing Process.
11) Public Recreational Facilities Authority, Request to Adopt Resolution of
Intent to delete all references to development lots in standard ease-
ment form.
12) Discussion: Establishment of Agriculture/Forestry Industry Support
Committee.
13) Appropriation Requests:
a. FY 1991-92 School Fund Carry-Over Balance (deferred from
October 14, 1992).
b. Early Childhood Development Grant for Brownsville Elementary School.
c. Regional Adult Education Specialist Grant.
14) Appoint Representative to Vote at VACo Annual Business Meeting (deferred
from October 14, 1992).
15) Discussion: Amendments to VACo By-Laws (deferred from October 14,
1992) .
16) 1993 Legislative Update.
17) Status Report on Keene Landfill Closure.
18) Discussion: Volunteer Program.
19) Discussion: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan.
20) Discussion: Debt Service.
21) Work Session: 1993/94-1997/98 Capital Improvements Program.
22) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
23) Executive Session: Personnel.
24) Certify Executive Session.
25) Adjourn.
CONSENT AGENDA
FOR APPROVAL:
5.1 Request from Children & Youth Commission to change appointment terms from calendar to fiscal year and to
allow the two current appointees to serve for another six months.
5.2 Approve Letter of Support/Participation for Earth Day '93.
5.3 Resolution to request that Commonwealth Drive Connector Road be taken into the State System of Secondary
Highways, and guaranteeing the road against defective materials and/or workmanship for one year up to a
maximum of $3750.00.
S.3a Resolution to request that Bentivar Drive in Bentivar SubdiVision be taken into the State System of
Secondary Highways.
FOR DIJiORMATIOII:
5.4 Letter dated October 28, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, giving monthly update on current
projects under construction.
5.5 Letter dated October 14, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Highway Engineer, to Marion L. Morrison,
re: additional speed limit signing on Owensville Road.
5.6 Letter dated October 14, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Highway Engineer, to Ellen S. Harris, re:
reduction of speed limit on Barracks Road.
5.7 Letter dated October 7, 1992, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, Highway Department, providing notice
that Route 1403 (Berkmar Drive) in Rio Hills has been added to the Secondary System of Highways.
5.8 Letter dated October 22, 1992, from Thomas F. Farley, Highway Department, providing notice of, public
hearing to consider the proposed location and design of Route 678 (Project #0678-002-223,C50l) from the
intersection of Route 250 to 0.26 mile north of the intersection of Route 250 in Albemarle County.
5.9 Georgetown Road - Update on safety and high t~affic volume concerns.
5.10 Arbor Crest Apartments Monthly Bund Program Report for the Month of September, 1992.
5.11 Letter dated October 14, 1992, from Hugh C. Miller, State Historic Preservation Officer, Department of
Historic Resources, providing notification that Knniscorthy, Albemarle County, 1m File #02-28, has been
entered in the National Register of Historic Places.
5.12 Letter dated October 22, 1992, from Hugh C. Miller, State Historic Preservation Officer, Department of
Historic Resources, providing notification that Bel1air, Albemarle County, 1m File #02-02, has been
entered in the National Register of Historic Places.
5.13 Letter dated October 26, 1992, from James Christian Hill, National Register Assistant, Department of
Historic Resources, providing notification that Michie Tavern, Albemarle County, 1m File #02-93, appears
to meet the criteria for listing on the Virginia Landmarks Register and the National Register of Historic
Places, but the Department will not prepare the national register nomination due to a full work program.
5.14 Letter dated October 9, 1992, from Kendrick R. Riggs, Senior Regulatory Counsel for Virginia Power,
transmitting copy of Application of Virginia Electric and Power Company for a general increase in rates
filed with the State Corporation Commission.
5.15 Letter dated October 21, 1992, from the Zoning Administrator, to Pete Bradshaw, Keswick Acquisition
Corporation, entitled "Official Determination of Number of Parcels - Section 10.3.1; Tax Map 80, Parcels
8, 60, 61, 62 and 109A."
5.16 Letter dated October 22, 1992, from the Zoning Administrator, to Bruce W. and Bonnie M. Kirtley, entitled
"Official Determination of Number of Parcels - Section 10.3.1; Tax Map 55, Parcel 99."
5.17 Copy of Minutes of Planning Commission for October 13, 1992.
5.18 Copy of Minutes of Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Board of Directors for September 28, 1992.
5.19 Department of Planning and Community Development's 1992 Third Quarter Building Report.
5.20 Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District Quarterly Report.
5.21 1991-1992 Report on Elementary, Middle and High Schools, dated October 26, 1992, prepared by the Over-
sight Committee for the Albemarle County Schools Long Range Plan.
5.22 Memorandum dated October 30, 1992, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, re: County/City Shared
Services - Purchasing Division.
5.23 County's Financial Management Report for September, 1992.
Edward H. Ba n, Jr.
Samuei Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvill
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
T
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
and Community Development
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CM~
November 5, 1992
Board Actions of November 4, 1992
the Board of Supervisors' meeting on November 4, 1992, the following
were taken:
Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
There were none.
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Request from Children & Youth Commission to change
ointment terms from calendar to fiscal year and to allow the two current
ointees to serve for another six months. APPROVh~
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Letter of Support/Participation for Earth Day '93.
AP ROVED letter of support with the following changes:
Add wording in first sentence, first paragraph, to read: Albemarle County
a beautiful place with many valuable natural resources." Add wording in last
tence, last paragraph, to read: "... the future of Albemarle County requires
t we all work together."
APPROVED participation by the Board at the kick-off breakfast (time, date
place to be determined) and
APPROVED participation of Mr. Brandenburger on planning committee for Earth
'93.
M mo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
November 5, 1992
D te:
P ge 2
Agenda Item No. 5.3. Resolution to request that Commonwealth Drive Connec-
t r Road be taken into the State System of Secondary Highways, and guaranteeing
t e road against defective materials and/or workmanship for one year up to a
m. ximum of $3750.00. ADOPTED
Agenda Item No. 5.3a. Resolution to request that Bentivar Drive in Benti-
v r Subdivision be taken into the State System of Secondary Highways. ADOPTED
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matter. Discussion: Millington Bridge (Route
6 1), draft letter to Ray Pethtel (deferred from October 14, 1992).
APPROVED as amended. Letter forwarded to Mr. Pethtel.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Other Highway Matters.
Mr. Perkins thanked Mr. Roosevelt for having asphalt laid under the bridge
or Route 240 in Crozet.
Mr. Bowerman and Mr. Martin requested they be notified of meetings of the
2eN Reconstruction Task Force.
The Board requested the Highway Department to look at the traffic movement
at the Route 20/53 intersection to see what improvements can be done to allevi-
ate traffic congestion and make a report to the Board on December 2.
Agenda Item No.8. Request for Resolution of Intent to rezone Tax Map 76,
P~rcel 17A (Department of Forestry property) from R-1 to CO.
ADOPTED the attached resolution of intent.
Agenda Item No.9. Request to amend the Albemarle County Service Authority
sErvice area boundaries for "water only" to Tax Map 79, Parcels 18 & 19 for
David W. Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum (Goco, Inc.).
Set public hearing for December 16, 1992, on a request to amend the Albe-
marle County Service Authority service area boundaries for "water only" to Tax
Map 79, Parcels 18 & 19 for David W. Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum
(( oco , Inc.).
Board requested a copy of letter dated August 14, 1989, from the State
Wa~er Control Board, concerning an investigation of groundwater contamination.
Agenda Item No. 10. Discussion: Fast Track Building Permit Issuing Process.
Received; no action.
M~mo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
November 5, 1992
D~te:
Pllge 3
Agenda Item No. 11. Public Recreational Facilities Authority, Request to
A opt Resolution of Intent to delete all references to development lots in
s andard easement form.
APPROVED a request from the Public Recreational Facilities Authority to
d lete the reference in paragraph #6 to development lots and any other refer-
e ces to development lots that occur in the standard easement form.
Agenda Item No. 12. Discussion: Establishment of Agriculture/Forestry
I dustry Support Committee.
APPROVED the establishment of an Agriculture/Forestry Industry Support
Clmmittee through staff recommendation of potential representatives and reques-
tEd the list of recommendations come back to the Board for review and appoint-
mEnt.
Agenda Item No. 13a. Appropriation: FY 1991-92 School Fund Carry-Over
Be lance (deferred from October 14, 1992).
APPROVED. Original form forwarded to Melvin Breeden under separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 13b. Early Childhood Development Grant for Brownsville
E ementary School.
APPROVED. Original form forwarded to Melvin Breeden under separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 13c. Regional Adult Education Specialist Grant.
APPROVED. Original form forwarded to Melvin Breeden under separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 14. Appoint Representative to Vote at VACo Annual Business
MEeting (deferred from October 14, 1992).
APPOINTED Mrs. Humphris as the Board's representative to vote at the VACo
Ar~ual Business Meeting, and APPOINTED Mr. Bowerman as the alternate.
Agenda Item No. 15. Discussion: Amendments to VACo By-Laws (deferred from
Oc~ober 14, 1992).
SUPPORTED the nomination of John J. Purcell as the Region 4 representative
on the VACo Board of Directors
MEmo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
November 5, 1992
Dcte:
Pcge 4
Agenda Item No. 16. 1993 Legislative Update.
Received; final legislative packet to be presented on December 2.
Agenda Item No. 17. Status Report on Keene Landfill Closure.
Received; no action.
Agenda Item No. 18. Discussion: Volunteer Program.
Received; no action.
Agenda Item No. 19. Discussion: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Ttansition Plan.
SET public hearing for December 9, 1992.
Agenda Item No. 20. Discussion: Debt Service.
Received; no action.
Agenda Item No. 24. Certify Executive Session.
The Board reconvened from lunch at 2:34 p.m. and certified the executive
sEssion. No action took place from that session.
Agenda Item No. 21. Work Session: 1993/94-1997/98 Capital Improvements
Program.
The Board did not disagree with the County Executive's recommendations and
set the public hearing for December 16, 1992. The staff was requested to pick
OLt the school items which were not funded and which are under $100,000 each,
acd these together for possible inclusion in the bond issue which is contem-
plated for Spring, 1993, and to report at the December 2 meeting as to the
effect the inclusion of these projects would have on the overall costs of the
bend issue.
Agenda Item No. 19. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan.
Tte Board voted to rescind its action taken earlier in the meeting and to set
tte public hearing for December 16 1992.
MEmo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
November 5, 1992
D,te:
P,ge 5
Agenda Item No. 22. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
The Board made the following appointments:
Architectural Review Board: Diane Edgerton Miller, Rudolph A. Beverly and
Hcrry W. Porter, for terms to expire on November 14, 1996. Mr. Porter was
reappointed with the understanding that he wishes to serve only until the ARB
Gtidelines are completed, so the Board will look favorably upon his resignation
at any time that it is rendered.
BOCA Code Board of Appeals: Burton M. Webb was reappointed to a term which
w"ll expire on August 21, 1997.
Conmunity Corrections Resources Board: James L. Camblos, III, was
rEappointed to a full term which will expire on December 31, 1996.
Fire Prevention Code Board of Appeals: William C. Thacker was reappointed
t< a term which will expire on November 21, 1996. Tom Trevillian was
rEappointed to a term which will expire on November 21, 1997.
Jefferson Area Board on ARinR: Mark Reisler was reappointed to a term
wlich will expire on October 20, 1995.
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority, Citizens Advisory Committee: William M.
Celony and W. Joseph Hoeller, Jr. were reappointed to terms which will expire on
DEcember 31, 1994.
Equalization Board: Hiawatha Green, James E. Clark, Jr. and Betty Starke
WEre reappointed for the calendar year 1993; terms will expire December 31,
Ie 93.
Committee to plan the 250th Anniversary of Albemarle County. Mrs. Humphris
will serve, as will Mr. Marshall and Mr. Perkins, if needed.
Shenandoah National Park Advisory Committee. Mr. Perkins reported that the
bill which George Allen introduced in Congress concerning the swapping of land
between the Park Service and VDOT, did not pass. There are now four members of
Congress from counties which physically touch the Shenandoah National Park. Mr.
Perkins would like to discuss in January, trying to get these people to join
wi~h Albemarle County to get the Allen legislation passed.
Mr. Perkins mentioned that the name "Buck Mountain Road" will probably be
ch~llenged.
MEmo To:
Dc:te:
Pc: ge 6
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
November 5, 1992
Mr. Perkins has just learned that the Highway Department is no longer
helping to obtain right-of-way along gravel roads for improvement projects. He
a~ked that staff confirm this with Mr. Roosevelt, and to consider assigning a
ccunty staff member to this task.
Mr. Perkins mentioned that he has requested Chief Miller to help the game
werden during the upcoming deer hunting season.
Mr. Martin inquired as to the date a report from the Fiscal Impact
Ccmmittee can be expected.
Mr. Marshall mentioned that a petition concerning the name of "the road
ftom Milton to Route 53 and on to Saddlewood" will be presented soon.
Agenda Item No. 25. Adjourn.
The Board meeting was adjourned at 3:29 p.m.
LEN:ewc
At tachments
cc: Robert B. Brandenburger
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Bruce Woodzell
Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
George R. St. John
File
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
nty, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
uested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
t, the following road:
Commonwealth Drive Connector
Beginning at Station 9+22, a point common to the center-
line of Peyton Drive and Commonwealth Drive, thence in a
northeasterly direction 774.15 feet to station 16+96.15,
being a point common to the centerline of Greenbrier
Drive (State Route 866) and Commonwealth Drive.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
tation be and is hereby guaranteed a 70 foot unobstructed
ht-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
rt of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1235, pages 293 to 296 and
es 298 to 302; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
nty, Virginia, hereby guarantees, for a period of one year from
date of acceptance into the Secondary System of Highways,
onwealth Drive Connector against defective materials and/or
kmanship up to a maximum of $3,750.00.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
wr'ting is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Bo rd of Supervisors of Albemar Ie County, Virginia, at a regular
me ting held on November 4,
rs
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
ounty, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
he Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
equested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
o final inspection and approval_by the Resident Highway Depart-
ent, the following road:
Bentivar Drive
Beginning at Station 0+24, a point common to the southern
edge of pavement of State Route 643 and the centerline of
Benti var Drive, thence in a southwesterly direction a
distance of 5,340 feet along the centerline of Bentivar
Drive to Station 53+64, the end of the cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
ortation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed
ight-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
s recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
ourt of Albemarle County in Deed Book 914, page 422; Deed Book
1067, page 524; Deed Book 1015, pages 765 and 766.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
w i ting is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Bard of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular
meting held on November 4, 1992.
Cl~~tY Supervisors
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
o F
I N TEN T
FURTHER requests the Albemarle County Planning Commission to
ld public hearing on said intent to rezone property, and does
r quest that the Planning Commission send its recommendation to
t is Board at the earliest possible date.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
unty, Virginia, does hereby state its intent to rezone property
own as Tax Map 76, Parcel 17A, owned by the Department of Fores-
y, located east of the U. S. Route 29 Bypass, south of Fontaine
enue and west of the University Real Estate Foundation from R-l
CO; and
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
w iting, is a true, correct copy of a resolution of intent
u animously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
C unty, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on Novembe 4, 1992.
~~.~ounty Supervisors
Edward H Bin. Jr
Samuel Mill r
Charlotte Y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX: (804) 972-4060
EARTH DAY '93
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
ScoHsvdle
David p, Bow rman
Charloltesvil e
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
itizens of Albemarle County;
lbemarle County is a beautiful place with many valuable natural resources.
rotecting our environment and the beauty of our county is an immediate challenge
or all of us.
trash dumping, contamination of our air and water, and landfilling
nnecessary material are some of the things that occur here and throughout the
orld. We can no longer take for granted that our county and its environment
ill be preserved.
overnment regulation is not the solution. We are the solution. A first step
's for everyone to become aware of what we can do and to invoke that spirit in
ur work and our everyday lives. Only through an enlightened citizenry can we
egin to solve these problems in our community.
e strongly support and encourage the efforts of radio stations WCHV and 3WV in
. proving the environment. Their publication of "Save Our Environment" and their
her plans for celebrating Earth Day '93 will be a significant step in helping
us all become informed on these complex issues. We know you will find the
rticles in "Save Our Environment" not only informative, but will see also a
c allenge. The challenge is how you can help in the protection of our
e vironment. This is a challenge we encourage you to undertake with us,
HV/3WV, and the many others involved in protecting our environment. Shaping
e future of Albemarle County requires that we all work together.
Sincerely,
vid P. Bowerman
airman
arlottesville District
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Vice-Chairman
Samuel Miller District
iter F. Perkins
ite Hall District
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett District
rrest R. Marshall, Jr.
ottsville District
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna District
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
R B92-9
David P. Bower an
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
5coIIsville
Edward H Bat , Jr
Samuel Miller
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y H mphns
Jack JoueM
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
FAX (804) 972-4060
November 4, 1992
Y D. Pethtel, Commissioner
partment of Transportation
mmonwealth of Virginia
1 01 East Broad Street
R'chmond, Virginia 23219
ar Mr. Pethtel:
bemarle County wants to pursue the possibility of replacing the Millington
idge on Route 671 in its current location. This has long been the County's
eference. In view of the current impasse in obtaining the necessary right-of-
y easements from the Virginia OUtdoors Foundation and the continued
terioration of the current bridge, it is necessary to look at other
ternatives.
owing the state will not support the expenditure of state funds unless the
idge and its accesses can be brought up to state standards, the County is
nsidering the possible expenditure of local funds to replace the bridge in its
rrent location. This action is considered prudent in light of not only the
rrent impasse but also in terms of possible significant cost differentials.
e Virginia Department of Transportation's current estimate to complete the
een Line alignment is $1,468,000. Your Resident Engineer, Mr. Daniel S.
osevelt, provided a ballpark estimate to replace the bridge deck in its current
cation of $135,000. Although this may be low,' the possibility of significant
c st savings demands this alternative be investigated.
e Board of Supervisors requests your support in determining the feasibility of
is proposal and in the spirit of mutual cooperation seeks your assistance. The
rginia Department of Transportation's position and advice will be critical to
e Board's discussion of this proposal. Though not all-encompassing, the Board
s identified the following initial issues:
· Would the bridge have to be taken out of the secondary road system
for such construction, or reconstruction, to take place? If so, can
this be done?
· If the bridge were replaced in its current location, and designed to
state and federal safety standards, what additional requirements
would have to be met for the bridge to be accepted into the
secondary road system?
· What procedures and policy decisions would have to occur for such a
proposal to reach fruition if it were determined to be feasible?
*
Printed on recycled paper
Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner
Department of Transportation
November 4, 1992
Page 2
. What steps, and associated timeline, would be required for any state
reviews and/or approvals? This is critical in determining when
local funds would need to be allocated and when they would need to
be expended. _
. What impact would this have on our six-year secondary road plan
recently approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board?
. What is VDOT's forecast of the useful life of the current Millington
Bridge?
. If VDOT would not accept a replacement bridge into the state system,
would the state perform inspection and maintenance from secondary
road funds? If not, what inspection and maintenance would be
required by the state?
While these may not be all the critical questions, it is a starting point in
determining if it is a feasible alternative. I would ask that you address any
other critical issues that are germane to this proposal.
In summary, replacing the current bridge is not at issue. Replacing the bridge
at a reasonable cost that meets the needs of the citizens of Albemarle County is
our objective. This proposal offers another alternative. I look forward to your
response and if a meeting of County and VDOT staff is necessary to further
explore this alternative, we will be happy to participate.
Sincerely,
/
~~~
~ .
David P. Bowerman,
Chairman
DPB/dbm
92.056
cc: Mr. Thomas F. Farley, Culpeper District
Mr. Daniel S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
'. -
..
t, ~
Edward H Bal , Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scoltsville
David P Bowe man
Charloltesvill
Charles S Martin
Riv~nna
Charlotte Y H mphns
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
November 5, 1992
M . John F. Dawson, Jr.
C airman, Children & Youth Commission
C"ty Hall Annex
P Box 911
C arlottesville, VA 22902
At its' meeting on November 4, 1992, the Board of Supervisors
proved a request from the Children & Youth Commission to change
e appointment terms from calendar to fiscal year, and to allow
. Ellie Tucker and Ms. Blanche Steppe to continue serving on the
mmission until June 30, 1993.
D ar Mr. Dawson:
Very truly yours,
~?~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
L
c Roxanne White
Rory Carpenter
Jeanne Cox
.. .
f)'(',TF;!"'I.P~C,-.~ T:'-; u,...,p",..J ,\,..:.".,':;"P;
C'j-j -.~~~:j b~ .30~_g2'"_n_~..
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA
Childre
Terms
ITLE: Charlottesville/Albemarle
and Youth Commission Appointment
AGENDA DATE:
November 4, ~992
ITEM NUMBER:
L1~. (I oY(5\)
SUBJECT
Childre
appoint
year.
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: ~
White
ATTACHMENTS: No
/1,--
REVIEWED BY:/V'fAJ I
-
CKGROUND:
en the Board of Supervisors approved the formation and selection of members for the
arlottesville/Albemarle Children and Youth Commission in November 1990, the 2 year
rms were set to start and end on November 14. The Children and Youth Commission has
quested permission from the Board to change the starting and ending dates of their
mber terms to conform with the riscal year, i.e July 1 to June 30. TheCommission
els that this change will enable the ongoing rotation of members to be more in line
th their program year and ongoing project assignments. This change will also allow
o current Board members, Ellie Tucker and Blanche steppe to continue serving on the
mmission for another six months until June 30.
COMMENDATION:
aff recommends approval of the Children and Youth Commission's request to revise the
ginning and ending dates for current and future Commission members and to allow the
o current appointees to serve for another six months.
./
\ t
9 .154
..-- '"
Office of the Clerk of City Council
P.O. Box 911 · Charlottesville. Virginia · :'2902
Telephone 804-971- 311.~
~OTTE8r;
&'i1~
U~",v"'~~H
1/.."". ;,...2~'.J ..' , .
~1~:" \,." I tt I C\l
""' \~',,~',,;\i I". I ~
~~''''~ ~
GINIA" '\;
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
November 4, 1992
Mr. Rory Carpenter, Director
CACY Commission
City Hall
Charlottesville, Va. 22902
Dear Rory:
This is to notify you that at its November 2, 1992
meeting, City Council unanimously voted to extend the terms
of the CACY Commission members so that they will all expire
on June 30th.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~xu
Clerk of City Council
cc: Lettie Neher
Edward H. Ba n, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hail
November 5, 1992
s. Blanche R. steppe
ute 14, Box 66
arlottesville, VA 22901
ar Mrs. steppe:
At the Board of Supervisors meetihg held on November 4,
1 92, you were reappointed to the Children and Youth Commission
w'th a term to expire on June 30, 1993.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
(-'.7~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
o B/jnh
c Jeanne Cox, Clerk, City Council
Roy Carpenter, Executive Director
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H Ba n, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FA(< (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scoltsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvill
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphns
Jack Jouett
Walter F. PerkinS
White Hall
November 5, 1992
M s. Elly Tucker
1 1 Reynard Drive
C arlo~~ VA
D ar Mrs. Tucker. -,
22901
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
1 92, you were reappointed to the Children and Youth Commission
w'th a term to expire on June 30, 1993.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
sincerely,
?:J~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c Jeanne Cox, Clerk, City Council
Roy Carpenter, Executive Director
*
Printed on recycled paper
rJ .~
Edward H. B In, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scoftsville
David P. Bo erman
Charlottesl,/i Ie
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
October 5, 1992
M . John F. Dawson, Jr.
C ildren and Youth Commission Board
C'ty Hall Annex
P.O. Box 911
C arlottesville, VA 22901
ar Director:
The terms of the following members of the Children and Youth
mmission Board expire as shown:
Blanche R. Steppe expires on November 14, 1992
Elly Tucker expires on November 14, 1992
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
wether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
m y be prepared if necessary.
Sincerely,
~~~t~
Board of County Supervisors
L /jnh
..~
~
Edward H. Ba n. Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
ScolIsville
David P Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S. Martin
Rlvanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
October 5, 1992
M . Blanche R. Steppe
C ildren and Youth Commission Board
R ute 14, Box 66
C arlottesville, VA 22901
Your term on the Children and Youth Commission Board will
e pire on November 14, 1992.
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
ether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
y be prepared if necessary.
D ar Ms. Steppe:
~~
Lettie E. Neh r, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
L /jnh
~ . ..
Edward H. Bal . Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scotlsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
October 5, 1992
. Elly Tucker
ildren and Youth Commission Board
1 Reynard Drive
arlottesville, VA 22901
Ms. Tucker:
term on the Children and Youth Commission Board will
November 14, 1992.
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
ether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
y be prepared if necessary.
~&7/~
Lettie E. Ne~rk' CMC
Board of County Supervisors
L /jnh
.,.'.~
i
Edward H. Sal . Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
5coltsville
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y H mphTls
Jack Jouett
Walter F PerkinS
White H.~1I
November 12, 1992
Mr. Brad Eure
General Manager
W /3WV
1140 Rose Hill Drive
C arlottesville, VA 22901-3826
Dear Mr. Eure:
At its meeting on November 4, 1992, the Board of Supervisors
c ended the efforts undertaken by WCHV and 3WV towards protecting
t e environment. Attached is a letter of support for inclusion in
t e publication "SAVE OUR ENVIRONMENT". The Board also agreed to
h ve a representative speak at a kick-off breakfast on what the
C unty is doing environmentally and how citizens can participate.
In addition, the Board appointed Mr. Robert B. Brandenburger,
Assistant County Executive, to participate on a planning committee
f r Earth Day '93. All correspondence to Mr. Brandenburger can be
sent to the County Office Building at the above address.
~U~?~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
:ec
achment
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Robert B. Brandenburger
- - ,
,
Edward H Ba n. Jr.
Samuel Mill r
Charlotte Y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
EARTH DAY , 93
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scoltsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
itizens of Albemarle County;
lbemarle County is a beautiful place with many valuable natural resources.
environment and the beauty of our county is an immediate challenge
Illegal trash dumping, contamination of our air and water, and landfilling
u necessary material are some of the things that occur here and throughout the
rId. We can no longer take for granted that our county and its environment
ill be preserved.
vernment regulation is not the solution. We are the solution. A first step
for everyone to become aware of what we can do and to invoke that spirit in
r work and our everyday lives. Only through an enlightened citizenry can we
gin to solve these problems in our community.
strongly support and encourage the efforts of radio stations WCHV and 3WV in
proving the environment. Their publication of "Save Our Environment" and their
her plans for celebrating Earth Day '93 will be a significant step in helping
all become informed on these complex issues. We know you will find the
ticles in "Save Our Environment" not only informative, but will see also a
allenge. The challenge is how you can help in the protection of our
vironment. This is a challenge we encourage you to undertake with us,
HVj3WV, and the many others involved in protecting our environment. Shaping
e future of Albemarle County requires that we all work together.
'a--
~~/~A~
r.
Crh~ ~IJ!~-
CrIes S. Mar Ln.
Rivanna District
R 892-9
P'
-.. .......,....,..",.-
T;-, r~:'f '"'": ..\/.=/.'.3~Kg
10 X.-UJZ- _.__
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA ITLE:
Letter f Support for Earth Day '93.
AGENDA DATE:
November 4, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
L/j~.1 \ Di.-{ (Cj.l)
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT
Approve
efforts
enviro
PROPOSAL RE UEST:
a letter of support for WCHV/3WV's
for Earth Day '93 and the need for
ental awareness.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: ---1L-
INFORMATION:
Brandenburger
ATTACHMENTS: Yes (2)
REVIEWED BY' ~
Eure, General Manager of WCHV/3WV, is planning the publication of an environmental
ion publication called "SAVE OUR ENVIRONMENT" as one of many activities for Earth Day
e held in April. Mr. Eure is requesting Board/County assistance in three areas:
. A letter of support for the publication, "SAVE OUR ENVIRONMENT";
· A representative of the Board to speak at a kick-off breakfast on what the County
i doing environmentally and how citizens can participate, and;
. Bard and/or staff participation on a planning committee for Earth Day '93.
The pla ning committee is expected to meet monthly and the role of the Board/staff
tative will be to represent and coordinate County services for Earth Day '93. I
that Bob Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive, represent the staff on the
e in addition to any participation by the Board as this should facilitate
tion of any County services.
ON:
of the publication is available for review in the Clerk's Office and will also be
e at the Board meeting. Attached is a draft letter of support that would be printed
t of the publication.
RECOMME
(1) A
(2) P
d
(3) P
ATION:
cept the letter of support for final signature;
rticipation by the Board at the kick-off breakfast (time, date, place to be
termined); and
rticipation of Bob Brandenburger on the committee.
92.155
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
FAX (804) 972-4060
DRAFT
C tizens of Albemarle County;
A bemarle County is a beautiful place. Protecting our environment and the beauty
o our county is an immediate challenge for all of us.
I legal trash dumping, contamination of our air and water, and landf illing
necessary material are some of the things that occur here and throughout the
rld. We can no longer take for granted that our county and its environment
11 be preserved.
vernment regulation is not the solution. We are the solution. A first step
for everyone to become aware of what we can do and to invoke that spirit in
r work and our everyday lives. Only through an enlightened citizenry can we
gin to solve these problems in our community.
strongly support and encourage the efforts of radio stations WCHV and 3WV in
proving the environment. Their publication of "Save Our Environment" and their
her plans for celebrating Earth Day '93 will be a significant step in helping
all become informed on these complex issues. We know you will find the
ticles in "Save Our Environment" not only informative, but will see also a
allenge. The challenge is how you can help in the protection of our
vironment. This is a challenge we encourage you to undertake with us,
HVj3WV, and the many others involved in protecting our environment. Shaping
e future of Albemarle County requires we all work together.
S ncerely,
E ward H. Bain, Jr.
V ce-Chairman
S uel Miller District
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
Charlottesville District
C arlotte Y. Humphr~s
J ck Jouett District
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville District
S. Martin
District
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall District
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
R B92-9
fiARLOTTES'dlJF',S ULDlES STATI(),
1140 Rose Hill Drive
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-3826
(804) 977-5566
Fax (804) 977-0747
3WV
97.51'M
October 8, 1992
Mr. Dave Bowerman
Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
C/O The Fitness Gallery
192 Zan Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dave:
Thanks for agreeing to look at this. Please read the attached letter
that was sent last month to get the basics of what WCHV and 3WV
are planning for Earth Day '93 and then I'll catch you up on what's
happened recently.
I've met with John Hermsmeier and Andrea Trank of the Tandem
Center for the Environment. They have both the reviewed the guide
and liked it. A letter of support from Andrea is attached. We are
forming a task force to plan the festivities for Earth Day '93. Our
first meeting is scheduled for next week.
Dave, I need the County's support. I ask that you offer us a letter of
support. Recycling and the environment are issues that must be
addressed in Albemarle. We hope to increase awareness and help
solve some the problems we have with SAVE 0 DR
ENVIRONMENT.
Thanks for help.
Sincerely,
~
Brad Eure
General Manager
Enclosures
September 25, 1992
Mr. Brad Eure
General Manager
WCHV!WWWV
Rosehill Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Brad:
The Tandem Center for the Environment commends you for taking
such a positive step toward protecting the environment by
pub 1 ish i ng .. Save Our Env ironment, .. As an organ i zat i on devoted
toward educating our citizens about their role in protecting our
1 oca 1 env ironment, we we 1 come a pub 1 i cat i on such as th is wh i ch
clearly and simply provides citizens with good information about a
~ide range of environmental issues. We also welcome the proactive
stance you are tak i ng in regards to Earthday 1993 and are very
appreciate of your support of the Greenlights Directory.
We look forward to an excellent working relationship and hope
you can make our meeting on Oct. 13, 1992 at 7 pm at the Tandem
~choo 1 .
Sincerely,
(t'0J,~ tJ Ju~
Andrea B. Trank
Co-Director
Tandem Center for the Environment
p.S. I am enclosing a Greenlights Directory for your files.
\CHV
1140 Rose Hill Drive
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-3826
(804) 977-5566
Fax (804) 977-0747
3WV
CHARLOTTES,? LE'S OLDIES snrro.v
97.S1'M
eptember 9, 1992
r. Dave Bowerman
hairman, Albemarle Board of Supervisors
/0 Fitness Gallery
92 Zan Road
harlottesville, VA 22902
issue is becoming more and more important to all
f us...and it should. But many of are confused. There are lots
f problems in many different areas. We don't understand what we
an do or should do to help.
e can help by learning more about the ozone layer, air pollution,
utomobile maintenance, pesticides, water pollution, toxic
ubstances in our homes, recycling, acid rain, global warming and
ore. How does it tie in to us in Charlottesville? What can we
o?
o help answer those questions and others, WCHV and 3WV are
ndertaking a project and we need your help. Next April, in
onjunction with Earth Day, WCHV and 3WV will publish and
istribute 10,000 copies of SAVE OUR ENVIRONMENT. A prototype is
nclosed for your review.
n conjunction with SAVE OUR ENVIRONMENT WCHV and 3WV are planning
o hold a series of on-air programs on the environment as well as
ponsor a breakfast to highlight the environmental cause in the
rea.
ask that you help us in two ways. First, I ask that you review
he publication and, if you think it worthy, offer a letter of
upport. Attached are copies of such letters from other
ommunities, including one from Elizabeth Haskell, Virginia's
ecretary of Natural Resources for a publication done in Richmond.
econd, I ask that you attend our breakfast kickoff (date and
ocation to be determined) to speak on what the City is doing
nvironmentally and how the citizens can participate.
,
hank you very much.
OEEOE CORRAOINI
.....yOR
~~'~<QlHl~<t~~l~r
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING
451 SOUTH STATE STREET. ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
TELEPHONE 535-7704
February 25, 1992
citizens of Salt Lake City:
As residents of Utah we enjoy a lifestyle that is unequaled
this country. The natural beauty of our surroundings makes us
e envy of the rest of the United States.
That is why I believe it is important for all of us to back
ograms such as the KISN AM/FM Radio "Save Our Environment"
formation guide.
Protecting the environment of our state should be a priority
r all of us, so please join me in support of this very
rthwhile project.
Corradini
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
EIizabelh H. I
Secretary 01 lunIl Resources
Office of the Governor
Richmond 23219
(804) 7~
TOO (804) 786-7765
January 22, 1992
ear Friends of Virginia's Environment:
As Virginia's Secretary of Natural Resources, I want to congratulate WRV A for
15 fine efforts to promote environmental stewardship.
The issues discussed in this publication reflect many of the global environmental
ncems. Environmental issues ~ complex, but even so, there are many simple actions
e can take that promote environmental quality. We can recycle at work, at home and
t school. You can learn more about the environmental issues facing our communities
d companies - and help make responsible, prudent decisions that protect the
nvironment. There are many ways to help.
The 25 tips listed on this page were developed by the state's natural resources
gencies to help citizens take positive environmental action. Please join us in protecting
irginia's natural resources and in supporting WR VA's efforts to encourage environmental
onservation.
~r:'kVl ~ '~MWG
Elizabe h H. Haskell
. '(~r(p,
~......~Ti./~
'-- '" ~ .~\
,'. ''f'~j''~ --- :1,~
....,;""", ,-_"::'
,..... -" '.'~S;.....)
, ~ ~~
; : r;~ ~' -:,~j :
\ . ';Y-~'-~'i .
~'''''.-~'~ ,zi~_
\r __6., '\a~""'" 'I'~
. ~...,. P!:'~-=r""
, ?'. ~'e'"
"1iJl1J l~ \
OFFI
MAY
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
CALlFOR:\I:\
CITY HALL
ROOM 205
9] 5 ] STREET
SACRAMEt"TO. CA
958] 4-26-'2
PH 9]6-449-5300
FAX 916-449-8680
TDD (only) 916-;49-;819
eptember 25, 1991
ear Sacramentans:
ur environment has never needed you more. As scientists discover
ore about the interrelationships of our complex ecosystem and the
trains modern society places on it, we also learn what steps we
an take to ease the strains. Those steps can often be enacted on
n individual or local level, by informed and concerned community
embers, such as the readers of "Save Our Environment."
adio Station KHYL 101 is to be commended for their active
ommitment to improving the environment. Publication of "Save Our
nvironment" and the other plans KHYL has for celebrating Earth Day
ill go a long way toward bringing environmental issues to the
ore front in Sacramento. I know you will find the articles in
· Save Our Environment" enlightening and helpful in formulating your
wn views on the pressing environmental issues of our day.
e Sacramentans can shape the future, not only of our lovely
alley, but of the nation and the world as well, by taking some of
he steps mentioned in this publication to check the deterioration
f our fragile planet.
wish all of you a bright, healthy Earth Day 19921
incerely,
.......
/ ,
. / .
/0--<.-eL~'--
E RUDIN
ayor
:kgs:g13f
.
The City of Toronto
June Rowlands
Mayor
GREETINGS
SAVE OUR ENVIRONMENT
I formation about the environmental problems we face in the 1990s and workable solutions are
ered in SA VE OUR ENVIRONMENT, a publication designed to promote awareness at all
I vels of our community. Its goal is to help educate and to motivate people to make our
e vironment a cleaner place for present and future generations.
otecting the environment is everyone's responsibility. From industry and manufacturing
rations to residents in our community, the steps taken by all towards the welfare of our
e vironment have a cumulative effect.
behalf of City Council and the people of Toronto, I am pleased to extend my best wishes
Ii r the success of the publication, SAVE OUR ENVIRONMENT.
{?J~
City Hall, Toronto, M5H 2N2, Canada. Tel: (416) 392-7001 Fax: (416) 392-0026
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
347 CITY HALL
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
(612) 298-4323
ar Readers:
ving our environment starts with our individual actions in
eryday life. While government can and should facilitate
ange. Ultimately, the individual choices we make each day add
to the global abuse from which our environment suffers.
a society, we must start living better by investing in our
vironment. Every time we spend money we make a decision about
r environment. We can continue to trash our environment by
king shortsighted decisions about how we live. Or, we can
vest, by bussing to work, buying returnable and recyclable
ckaging, installing high-efficiency lighting in our homes, and
stponing that next vacation until the house is insulated.
rthermore, we can install high-efficient showerheads, convert
r toilet tanks, use baking soda and soap instead of chemical
eaners, and buy products that have the longest possible life--
st canceling your newspaper subscription 'with a neighborhood
aring will save six trees per year.
en we invest in our environment, we invest in better living, we
vest in ourselves. Not only will we have a better environment,
t we will have more_money. Making the commitment to invest in
r environment can save the average family of four as much as
,000 per year. Year after year after year. Please join me in
king this commitment.
Scheibel
.~"G
Prinl<d oa Recycled Paper
",
/;';.~!~TI{e- .s-
/"'~>m'~" . -;...
~J;" ..~ ...-" -~ ~
'-' A' -
'-' . .... .../
\;;'~i'. ..:
'~';' I ... /~':;."
-< . ",.,<~...
J 8 9 ~"",
STATE OF UTAH
NORMA H. BANGERTER
OVER NOR
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
SALT LAKE CITY
84114
April 12, 1991
De r KISN:
On behalf of all Utahns, it is with great pride that I support the efforts of
N AM\FM Radio to educate us all on how we can work together to save our
onmellt.
Utah is one of the most beautiful states in the union, Keeping Utah beautiful
portant to each and every one of us now and for future generations. We can
e a difference.
AR Governor of the State of Utah, I urge you to join me in support of the KISN
io "Save Our Environment" information guide.
-
Sincerely,
:
Edward H. Sa n. Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virgin~ 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P Bow rman
CharlottesvllI
Charles S Martin
Rlvanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
T
F OM:
Wayne A. Smith, Civil Engineer II
Engineering Department ~ /
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
D TE:
November 5, 1992
S BJECT:
Resolutions Requesting Acceptance of Commonwealth Drive
Extended and Bentivar Drive into the State System of
Secondary Highways
At its meeting on November 4, 1992, the Board of Supervisors
a opted the following resolutions requesting the Highway Department
t accept Commonwealth Drive Extended and Bentivar Drive into the
S ate Secondary System of Highways. Attached are the signed
r solutions.
tachments: Originals and 3 copies of each
. .
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
e Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
quested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
nt, the following road:
Commonwealth Drive Connector
Beginning at Station 9+22, a point common to the center-
line of Peyton Drive and Commonwealth Drive, thence in a
northeasterly direction 774.15 feet to station 16+96.15,
being a point common to the centerline of Greenbrier
Drive (State Route 866) and Commonwealth Drive.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
tation be and is hereby guaranteed a 70 foot unobstructed
ht-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Cireui t
rt of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1235, pages 293 to 296 and
es 298 to 302; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
nty, Virginia, hereby guarantees, for a period of one year from
date of acceptance into the Secondary System of Highways,
onwealth Drive Connector against defective materials and/or
kmanship up to a maximum of $3,750.00.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
wr ting is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Bo rd of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular
me ting held on November 4,
Clerk, Board of Co' ty Supervi rs
,'." r....
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
unty, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
e Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
quested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
nt, the following road: -
Bentivar Drive
Beginning at Station 0+24, a point common to the southern
edge of pavement of State Route 643 and the centerline of
Benti var Drive, thence in a southwesterly direction a
distance of 5,340 feet along the centerline of Bentivar
Drive to Station 53+64, the end of the cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
p rtation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed
r"ght-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
a recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Curt of Albemarle County in Deed Book 914, page 422; Deed Book
1 67, page 524; Deed Book 1015, pages 765 and 766.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
w i ting is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Bard of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular
meting held on November 4, 1992.
~:~
Cl~~d of C nty Supervisors
~ ~
Edward H. Bin, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
SCOlt5ville
David p, Bow rman
Charlotlesvi Ie
Charles S. Martin
Rili('lnna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
November 5, 1992
M . Stephen M. Melton
V rginia Land Company
P Box 847
C arlottesville, VA 22906
D ar Mr. Melton:
At its' meeting on November 4, 1992, the Board of Supervisors
a opted the attached resolution requesting the Highway Department
t accept Bentivar Drive into the State Secondary System of High-
ys.
v..eerrYY ~ to~ lyy yours.
~-~~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
L N:ec
~."
I): 5j iz,1 F:'cJ(!J....UL 11/ '-I/F2_
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Cpunty, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
t~e Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
rl~quested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
t b final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
mE~nt, the following road:
Bentivar Drive
Beginning at Station 0+24, a point common to the southern
edge of pavement of State Route 643 and the centerline of
Benti var Drive, thence in a southwesterly direction a
distance of 5,340 feet along the centerline of Bentivar
Drive to Station 53+64, the end of the cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
p(brtation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed
r ght-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
a: recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Ccmrt of Albemarle County in Deed Book 914, page 422; Deed Book
1( 67, page 524; Deed Book 1015, pages 765 and 766.
* * * * *
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
0:
ATE:
E:
Lettie E. Neher, Board of Supervisors Clerk
Pam Shifflett, Engineering Assistant'~;N\
November 2, 1992
Board Resolution for Bentivar Drive
Attached is a resolution adopted by the Board on 12/06/89 to
have Bentivar Drive taken into the State secondary road system.
All items to have this road accepted were not completed until
this month. VDOT has advised that we will need to have another
resolution adopted by the Board due to the time lapse.
The resolution contents appear to be accurate and complete.
This is to request that you have the Board readopt this
resolution.
If any questions, please call.
PSI
Attachment
..
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
the Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
ment, the following road in Bentivar Subdivision:
Bentivar Drive:
Beginning at Station 0+24, a point common to the southern edge
of pavement of State Route 643 and the centerline of Bentivar
Drive, thence in a southerwesterly direction a distance of
5,340 feet along the centerline of Bentivar Drive to Station
53+64, the end of the cul-de-sac.
..,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-.
portition be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed right-
of-weyand drainage easements along this requested addition as
reco ded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court
of A bemarle County in Deed Book 914, page 422; Deed Book 1067,
page 524; Deed Book 1015, pages 765 and 766. I
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing'
writ"ng is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted
by tIe Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
regu ar meeting held on December 6'.1?~2-~
~rd of cou~superVisors
Edward H Bin. Jr
Samuei Mill r
David P. Bow rman
Charlottewile
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FA>Z (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivdnn{\
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkms
\~.lhlle Hall
November 2, 1992
. Stephen M. Melton
rginia Land Company
Box 8147
arlottesville, VA 22906
ar Mr. Melton:
Your request to have Bentivar Drive taken into the State
condary System of Highways has been received and referred to the
unty Engineer. When the County Engineer has certified that all
rk has been completed in accordance with approved plans, this
quest will be placed before the Board of Supervisors for adoption
the necessary resolution.
Very truly yours,
~~~Clerk. CMC
:ec
c Jo Higgins, County Engineer
...
CHARLES WILLIAM HURT
VIRGINIA LAND COMPANY BUILDING
POST OFFICE BOX 8147
CHARLOTrESVILLE, V ffiGINIA 22906
AREA COOE 804
TELEPHONE 979-8181
FAX 296-3510
November 2, 1992
Mrs. Lettie Neher
County of Albemarle
Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mrs. Neher:
We would like to have the Board of Supervisors pass a resolution
to have Bentivar Drive taken into the State Secondary System of
Highways.
The above request was originally made in December of 1989,
however due to complications was never completed. Mr. Jim
Kesterson of VDOT is requesting an updated resolution.
By copy of this letter I am asking Jack Kelsey to bring you up to
date on the above request.
PA.~
Step en M. Melton
Agent, Charles W. Hurt
cc: Jack Kelsey
,
Edward H. Bai , Jr.
Samuel Mille
David P. Bowe man
Charlottesvill
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
--
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972A060
July 16, 1992
Mr. Stephen M. Melton
Vi ginia Land Company
PO Box 8147
Ch rlottesville, VA 22906
Mr. Melton:
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Your request to have Bentivar Drive taken into the State
ondary System of Highways has been received and referred to the
nty Engineer. When the County Engineer has certified that all
k has been completed in accordance with approved plans, this
uest will be placed before the Board of Supervisors for adoption
the necessary resolution.
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
:ec
cc: Jo Higgins, County Engineer
,.
--
CHARLES WILLIAM HURT
VIRGINIA LAND COMPANY BUILDING
POST OFFICE BOX 8147
CHARLOtTESVILLE, VmCINIA 22906
AREA COOE 804
TELEPHONE 979-818'
fA, U:',:;',i C;,:~ ;'i.~>Ft~tf~-:~ro
r',~:\ '. . '-"'''', ,'_'_ _.,.
\:" :l"l
; " ~ 1
i' d t~.~?
\ I ~ .
'.. '
, ,
~:.:; (.... /\; ,: :~,: ,~
'l_J.
\iiC::(:
July 14, 1992
Mrs. Lottie Neher, Clerk
County of Albemarle
Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Neher:
We would like to have the Board of Supervisors ~ass a resolution
to have Bentivar Drive taken into the Virgin1a State Highway
System.
We would greatly appreciate the Boards consideration on the
above.
Sinc;:erely,
J
..~~-
Step en M. Melton
Agent, Charles W. Hurt
cc: Glenn Caudel
,
Distributed to Boar~. : -~ili.~. )1,0 ~ i)
I 17J' I " 107 ,.0
Agenda Item No. '::'.....L: 2:::L:...::. \,
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P O. BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902
D. S. ROOSEVElT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
RAY D. PE HTEL
COMMISSI NER
October 28, 1992
Current Projects
Construction Schedule
Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Boar of Supervisors
Coun y Office Building
401 clntire Road
Char ottesville, VA 22901
Dear Miss Neher:
Attached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently
unde construction in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is
forw rded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this
matt r with them at the next meeting if they so desire.
DSR/ mk
Yours truly,
/Il / ,//~
A-V/J. 'l)6L/l{2J2Udi
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
atta hment
cc: R. W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment
David Benish w/attachment
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
. -' ..
..
~
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
NOVEMBER 1, 1992
+------+--~----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
IROUTE I
INO.' I
LOCATION
STATUS
EST.COMP I
DATE I
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
I 250
I
I
I S~. CLAIR AVE. TO RTE. 64
I
CONSTRUCTION 57% COMPLETE
SEP 93
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I I
I 20 I A~ INT. ROUTE 742 {AVON ST. EXT.} CONSTRUCTION 15% COMPLETE JAN 93
I I
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I I I
I 654 I B~CKS RD. - FR. RTE. 1406 CONSTRUCTION STARTED OCT. 1** APR 93
I I TO GEORGETOWN RD. I
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
I
I
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
I
I
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
* REVISEP DATE
** NEW PROJECT
"
. ':" ..' ," .. -:.
"-"'-.-,.'.: .
.' .
.' ,
, \ t
RES 0 L UT I ON
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Ccunty, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
tle Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
rEquested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
tc final inspection and' approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
mEnt, the following road:
Commonwealth Drive Connector
Beginning at Station 10+00, a point common to the center-
line of Peyton Drive and Commonwealth Drive, thence in a
northeasterly direction 696.15 feet to station 16+96.15,
being a point common to the centerline of Greenbrier
Drive (State Route 866) and Commonwealth Drive.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
pc rtation be and is hereby guaranteed a 70 foot unobstructed
r'ght-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
a~ recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Ccurt of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1235, pages 293 to 296 and
pcges 298 to 302; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Ccunty, Virginia, hereby guarantees, for a period of one year from
tle date of acceptance into the Secondary System of Highways,
Ccmmonwealth Drive Connector against defective materials and/or
wcrkmanship up to a maximum of $3,750.00.
* * * * *
\
COlJNTY OF ALBEMARLE
. , . '0 '2', (~0
lJ:stnb!1'00 t,y q,~,;"~: _L~~cL._.~?-
. (::1' 7 I C iJ ~I;::-. :2)
r ,'. ':" q"';, ; ,- -:~ rdr - .. ,JI \ / \ ,;/
"',,(,1.\,. I.~", . ,,I. .<..J__._.._ ..........
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Lettie Neher, Board of Supervisors Clerk
Wayne A. smith, Sr., Civil Engineer rrftp/
October 26, 1992
Commonwealth Drive Connector Road Description
The following is a description of Commonwealth Drive Connector
oad:
Beginning at station 10+00, a point common to the
centerline of Peyton Drive and Commonwealth Drive, thence
in a northeasterly direction 696.15 ft. to station 16+96.15
being a point common to the centerline of Greenbrier Drive
(State Route 866) and Commonwealth Drive.
his road has a seventy foot (70') right-of-way and has been
built in accordance with the approved road plans. The deed
book references for right-of-way dedication and drainage
easements are deed book 1235, pages 298-302 and deed book 1235,
ages 293-296.
Commonwealth Drive Connector has been constructed to Virginia
epartment of Transportation (VDOT) standards. As you are
ware, VDOT requires a performance bond be posted for one year
from the date of road acceptance to ensure against defective
aterials and/or workmanship. The Board needs to guarantee
his road construction for the required one year period.
ording similar to the following should be included as a part
f the resolution:
"'!'he Board of Supervisors hereby guarantees, for a
period of one year from the date of acceptance into
the Secondary System of Highways, Commonwealth Drive
Connector against defective materials and/or
workmanship up to a maximum of $3,750.00.
f you have any questions, please contact me.
AS/vlh
1",,'7 . .~~
Distributed t.O.B. o. ard:.~L ~).. ,..~.ll. -r r (. \
. "_ il L. \ I ()'~.l2_!)
Agcnd" lk:r',, . ,.-.- -'--
l ~\ .... .'
October 14, 1992
Route 676
Mr. Mario~ L. Morrison
1710 Owen~ville Road
Charlotte~ville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. ~orrison:
Reference is made to your letter and petition dated October 4, 1992, requesting
additiona~ speed limit signing on Owensville Road.
Owen~ville Road, Route 676/678, has been posted with a 40 mph speed limit from Route 250
to Route ~14. In addition to this a number of horizontal curves have been posted for maximum
safe spe~d. These reduced speed postings are based upon an engineering study to determine
what spe~ds are adequate for the curvature and superelevation of each curve. The Department
expects mptorists to rely upon this information as accurate and honest. To post these curves
for a speed other than that determined by the engineering study would undermine this
confidenc~ and trust. I believe all the curves along Owensville Road have been reviewed
previously. I am, however, requesting the District Traffic Engineer review those curves
listed in your petition to determine if additional posting is necessary.
Once I obtain this information I will be in further touch with you.
DSR/smk
cc:
J. C
J. H
Chie
Miss
Yours truly,
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DuFresne w/attachment
Shifflett, Jr.
John Miller
Lettie E. Neher
t , "
October 14, 1992
Ms. Ellen S. Harris
Route 2, Eox 340
Charlottesville, VA 22904
Dear Ms. f. arris:
, 11\ 'AI C'J'7
Distributed to 8Jard: jLt;.J~_=~
- . \.
Agenda Item No. SLL.1.{2:::LC;}h)
Routes 676, 614
Refer~nce is made to your letter and petition dated October 8, 1992, requesting
reduction pf the speed limit on Barracks Road.
You ~ill remember that the Department reviewed
section in January 1992. At that time we found that 25%
the poste~ speed limit at the four locations monitored
I wrote Ch~ef Miller advising him of these conditions.
the accidents and speeds along this
or more of the traffic was exceeding
for speed. As a result of that study
As a result of your latest request I am requesting our District Traffic Engineer to
update th~ accident and speed limit studies to determine if conditions have changed. Upon
receipt of that information I will advise you concerning our findings and recommendations.
DSR/smk
Yours truly,
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
cc: J. C. DuFresne
J. H. Shifflett
Deleg, te Way
Senat<r Robb
Chief John Miller
Miss I ettie E. Neher
..
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
UITE B
COMMITTE;: ASSIGNMENTS,
EDGAR "ED" ROSS
25TH SEN TORIAL DISTRICT
GENERAL LAWS
ALBEMARLE. GRE NE. MADISON. NELSON
ORANGE, ESTERN PART
PRIVILEGE!; AND ELECTIONS
RAPPAHANNO K. SOUTHERN PART
REHABILITATION ANO SOCIAL SERVICES
CHAR OTTESVILLE
100 COURT SQUARE TERRACE
CHARLOTTESV LLE, VIRGINIA 22902
IS041786- 887 RICHMOND
SENATE
18041293.664 CHARLOTTESVILLE
1804, 77 -0388 FA X
1703.4 6-8347 HOME
October 19, 1992
Mr. Daniel S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 2013
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-2013
Dear Dan:
The letter and petition you recently received from Ms.
Ellen S. Harris in regard to reducing the speed limit on
Barracks Road to 45 MPH certainly seem to be with
substantial merit. I would appreciate very much being
informed as to how and when you, along with the Albemarle
County government, address the concerns of these 130
residents.
with kindest regards, I am
Sincerely yours,
~.
Ed Robb
cc: Mr. Thomas Farley, District Engineer, VDOT
~. David Bowerman, Chairman Albemarle Board of
Supervisors
Mr. Robert Tucker, Albemarle County Administrator
Ms Ellen S. Harris
ESR:jsl
i Ij - :/,(" ()?
". t'b t d t B'~ri~' 'I~, :, ,l-.
~IS n u eo>:."".J -~---'-";-(-""'''
(' "II,-n
'7 I LI ( . ~
Agenda Item Hr;. LJ-"-Q--"..~
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PE HTEL
COMMISSI NER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND,23219
October 7, 1992
Secondary System
Addition
Albemarle County
oard of Supervisors
ounty of Albemarle
01 McIntire Road
har1ottesvi11e, VA 22901
As requested in your resolution dated July 15, 1992, the following addition
o the Secondary System of Albemarle County is hereby approved, effective
eptember 24, 1992.
LENGTH
10 HILLS
oute 1403 (Berkmar Drive) - From Route 1417 to 0.23 mile South-
est Route 1417 0.23 Mi
Sincerely,
R~ h, ~1J,tJ
Ray D. Pethtel
Commissioner
e e: ~'jiflU"(\~
I ""-'If\1 "d
J0
I d.-tc u-
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
RAY D. PE HTEL
COMMISSI NER
..
Distributed to Board: lDit::..qz~
Agend.ltem No. ~I lOLl (c:J.:3)
.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
POBOX 671
CULPEPER, 22701
THOMAS F. FARLEY
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR
October 22, 1992
Location & Design Public Hearing
Route 678
Proj. 0678-002-223,C501
Albemarle County
ers
marle Board of Supervisors
McIntire Road
lottesville, Virginia 22901
Board Members:
Attached is a Public Hearing notice regarding project
-002-223,C501. The Hearing will be held Tuesday, November 17, at
p.m. in the Meriwether Lewis Elementary School, which is located
oute 676, approximately two miles north of Route 250 near Ivy.
representatives will be present immediately preceding the hearing
5:00 to 7:00 p.m. for an informal review of information.
The purpose of the Public Hearing will be to consider the proposed
tion and design of Route 678 from the intersection of Route 250 to
mile north of the intersection of Route 250 in Albemarle County.
Please let me know if you need additional information.
:lc
Att chment
cc: Mr. D. S. Roosevelt
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
,
LD-26-92
PUB L I C NOT ICE
PROPOSED HIGHWAY PROJECT
ROUTE 678
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
Representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) will hold a Location and Design Public Hearing on
uesday, November 17, 1~92 a~ 1:30 p.m. in the Meriwether Lewis
lementary School located on Route 676 two miles north of Route
50 near Ivy.
VDOT representatives will also be present at the above
ocation on the date of the hearing from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
or an informal review of available information by interested
.;ti2sns. All interested persons are enccur~ged to review ~he
prior to the formal hearing.
The purpose of this Public Hearing will be to consider the
roposed location and design of Route 678 from the intersection of
to 0.26 mile north of the intersection of Route 250 in
lbemarle County.
At this location and design public hearing, relocation
ssistance programs and tentative schedules for right of way
cquisition and construction will also be discussed.
All interested parties are urged to attend and give the
epartment their comments and suggestions relative to the proposed
ighway improvement.
--
Maps, drawings and other information are available for public
review in the Department of Transportation's District Office
located on Route 15 (Business) just south of Route 3 in Culpeper
and in its Residency Office located on Route 250 three miles east
of Charlottesville.
Written statements and other exhibits relative to the
proposed project may be presented in place of, or in addition to,
oral statements at the hearing. Such written statements and
exhibits may also be submitted to the Department at any time
within ten days after the public hearing.
Individuals requiring special assistance to attend and
participate in this meeting should contact the Charlottesville
Resident Engineer at (804) 296-5102.
'\,...,. V;'9in'. o.o."mon' 0' r,.n,po","on
October 6, 1992
~
TO ..
CHARLOTTESVILLE
I
HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ROUTE 678
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
PROJECT: 0678 - 002 - 223, C-501
FROM: I NT RTE. 250
TO: 0,263 MI. N. INT RTE. 250
LENGTH: 0.26 MILES
'fliirr
Q.
2 Mi les
Olsmit?UTl:oD T') 30"\".D :VlE",'.C;C:~5
ON ~. (0 - .~Q..::.~3-~:.-._
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA
Georget
- Update
AGENDA DATE:
November 4, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
qz .IIOL{ (S,Cf)
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
Road recently
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:~
STAFF C
Messrs.
Brandenburger
A'l"rACHMEN'rS: ;&NO
~
REVIEWED BY: I
~
presented a petition from Georgetown Road residents outlining various traffic and
oncerns on Georgetown and requested Board/VDoT assistance in addressing these issues.
of these had been previously addressed by the Resident Engineer, Mr. Roosevelt, and
y issues would involve the District Traffic Engineer, a meeting was held on Monday,
26th, with representatives of the VDoT District Office, Resident Engineer Office, Ms.
, staff, Mr. Hoel and two other Georgetown residents.
ON:
s of this meeting was to allow for the residents to fully address their specific
to VDoT staff in order to establish a common understanding of the issues. The next
this process will be a field visit with all interested parties and VDoT
tatives to further identify the specific concerns on site. VDoT will then respond
ommendations as appropriate.
information.
92.157
i'> "7 ~ '\ ()."7
\"'!Y'.L=
O. tb ted to Rnard' '\./ ,~,~.-.. -. )
ISJi U 1 rr(j.tf~1l~.?lt5}f()} tree t
Agenda Item N\l.~J5.lr(}-
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
410-659-7500
~\8/~ A~ F: r",tiTI<ltj/',J~ 5EF.\/l{~ES.
o tober 15, 1992
M . Bob Richardson
S vran Bank, N.A.
P st Office Box 26904
R'chmond, Virginia 23261
R
Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.)
D ar Mr. Richardson:
E closed please find the Bond Program Report and Monthly Report
P rsuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions for the month
o September 1992.
I you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
a 410-659-7500.
S ncerely,
r~ U h-~'y-,Jv<-Il~
S eila H. Moynihan
P oject Monitor
/ hm
e closures
c Ms. Lettie Neher
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Effective September 30, 1992
MONTHLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1(a) OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS
TO ABG Associates, Inc.
300 E. Lombard Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
RE Hydraulic Road Apartments - Aroor Crest Apart:rrents
Charlottesville, Virginia
Pu suant to Section 1(a) of the Deed Restrictions (the "Deed
Re~trictions"), as defined in an Indenture of Trust dated as of
Ap ill, 1983, between the Industrial Development Authority of
Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Authority"r, and your bank, as
tr~stee, the undersigned authorized representative of
Ri ~hmond-Albemarle Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited
Pa tnership (the "Purchaser"), hereby certifies with respect to
the operation and management of Hydraulic Road Apartments,
Ch,~rlottesville, Virginia (the "Project"), that as of the date
sh~j)wn below:
1) The number of units in the Project occupied by
lower income tenants is 15 .
2) The number of units in the Project unoccupied and
held available for Lower Income Tenants is -0-
.
3) The number of units rented and the number of units
held available for rental other than as described in
(1) and (2) is 51 .
4) The percentage that the number of units described in
(1) and (2) hereof constitute of the total number of
units in the Project is 23%
5) The information contained in this report is true,
accurate and correct as of the date hereof.
6) As of the date hereof, the Purchaser is not in
default under any covenant or agreement contained
in the Deed Restrictions or in an Agreement of Sale
dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Authority and
the Purchaser.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Report as of
October 6, 1992 , fiR~.
RICHMOND-ALBEMARLE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia
limited partnership
By: ~~J/ J'1-e:jt';:ZZ-
Authorized Representative
" , BONe PROGRAM Hf.POR"T
. ...
.-
Monlh September Year ~
P'O~t1y: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Ants.) PrO;.cl .: 051-35371
lOCltion: Charlottesville, VA Numbe, of Units 66
SubIT\ltt.d by: Loretta Wyatt October 6, 1992 Effective 9/30/92
Manager DaTe
Total Occupied 66
~ INCOME Bond Occupied
.. LOWE 15
The 10110," ,ng untts h.ve bcoen d~s'gnat.d as ..tower incom." un.t,
I 1 f rbor Crest Dr. 21 Eleanor Blair 41 el.
2 4 rbor Crest Dr. 22 Beverly T. Lane 42 62.
3 5 rbor Crest Dr. 23 Fannie G. Tisdale 4) 63.
4 9 rbor Crest Dr. 24 Virginia Burton 44 64.
S 12 rbor Crest Dr. 25 G. Robert Stone 45 IS.
6 14 rbor Crest Dr. 26 Evelyn Dover 4e ee.
7 . 15 rbor Crest Dr. 27 Jane Wood 47 17.
a 20 rbor Crest Dr. 28 Evelyn Mandeville 48 6a
9 24 I\rbor Crest Dr. 29 Gertrude Breen 49 &e.
10 78 i\rbor Cxest Dr. 30 Ernest M. Nease 50
70.
11 84 I\rbor Crest Dr. 31 Juanita Boliek ~, 71,
12. 90 I\rbor Crest Dr. 31 Florence Wheeler 52
72
13 94 ~rbor Crest Dr. 33 Sarah E. Fischer SJ 73.
14 102 ~rbor Crest Dr. 34 Anne Lee Bullard 54 74.
15 106 ~rbor Crest Dr. 3~ Katherine T. Nowlen~5 75.
16 36 ~ 76.
11 )1 57 77.
Its 38 ~. 7a.
19 39 S9 71.
~O 40 60 10.
T t\e cn.n ~s 'rom prevIOus fep('lrl r"lIeeled in the above "sling .r.
I
Oel.llona Addl1lona
to 4 AI bar Crest Dr. H Margaret Q. Sandford 4 Arbor Crest Dr. Beverly T. l.ane
I . 11.
2 12 2 12.
3 13 3 13.
.. 14 4. 14.
5 15 5 1$.
6 16 6 16.
7 17 7 17.
I 18 8 "..
. 19 9 ".
\0 20 10. 20.
., ' ! ;'\- ?-,'-\ ..'~ ''')
Dlstnbuted to Board' 'Ij ~..L': 11--
fl]~"-'--~ rc:; '.' \
Agenda Itt:tl! ;'40 -~.,"".,U.C.:CL~..:,../..'c I! )
...,.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Hugh C Mille, Director
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond. Virginia 23219
TDD (804) 786-1934
Telephone (804) 786-3143
P,lIX (804) 225-4261
vid P. Bowerman, Chairman
bemarle County Board of Supervisors
1 McIntire Road
arlottesville, VA 22901
Date of Listing
09-24-92
Enniscorthy, Albemarle County DHR File #02-28
Mr. Bowerman:
This is to inform you officially that the above property has
entered in the National Register of Historic Places. I am
this news is gratifying to you, and we share in your
If you have any questions about the National Register, we
to hear from you.
S
L t. ~tL:II~
C. Miller
Historic Preservation Officer
....
D~vid P. Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Ria: Enniscorthy
Optober 14, 1992
2.
c Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Phil Gramm, Chairman
Albemarle County Planning Commission
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Planning Director
Albemarle County
Nancy K. O'Brien, Executive Director
Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
Melinda Frierson
Albemarle County Historical Society
'<t
Disiributed to Bcud: JL~'-~~O .-LiZ
Agend" Item N'l 92, i II : '~.' / ~ 1'"7 ")
-.- ..__I..L.I-_+':"'/I c
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Hugh C Miller Director
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond. Virginia 23219
TC>D (804) 786-1934
Telephone (804) 786-3143
FAX. (804) 225-4261
o tober 22, 1992
vid P. Bowerman, Chairman
bemarle County Board of Supervisors
1 McIntire Road
arlottesville, VA 22901
Date of Listinq
10-15-92
Bellair, Albemarle County, DHR File #02-02
D ar Mr. Bowerman:
This is to inform you officially that the above property has
b en entered in the National Register of Historic Places. I am
s re that this news is gratifying to you, and we share in your
p easure.
If you have any questions about the National Register, we
w to hear from you.
S'ncerely,
H th0 ~i<l~~; II~
S ate Historic Preservation Officer
...
Devid P. Bowerman
RE: Bellair, Albemarl County
O<tober 22, 1992
2.
c Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Albemarle County
Phil Grimm, Chairman
Albemarle County Planning Commission
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Planning Director
Albemarle County
Nancy K. O'Brien, Executive Director
Thomas Jefferson Planning District COlnmission
Melinda Frierson
Albemarle County Historical Society
Geoffrey B. Henry, Consultant
...
CHECKLIST FOR STATE AND NATIONAL REGISTER PROCESS IN VIRGINIA
(1llI denotes completed step in the process)
Evaluation of Elliribility
all Preliminary Information Form received and
reviewed, additional information requested if
necessary
all Pre~ Information Form reviewed and
rated by RegIster Evaluation Team at semi-monthly
meeting
o Information on properties potentially affected by
federal undertakings reviewed and rated by Register
Evaluation Team at semi-monthly meeting
all Preliminary Information Form mailed to
members of State Review Board for review two
weeks prior to meetin~. Board makes
recommendation of ehgibility at bi-monthly
meeting. Section 106 evaluations are not taken
before the board.
Listill2 on the Re2isters
If applicant elects to pursue registration, applicant
consults with Department staff regarding cnteria,
areas of significance, period of significance and
boundaries,
all Department staff reviews nomination drafts upon
request and provides technical assistance
~ Department staff reviews completed nomination
~. Copies of nomina~on sent to ?1embers of both
poards two weeks pnor to meetmg
~ Owner(s), officials, and consultant notified of
oards' decisions
a Property is logged in at National Register office
~ Owner, consultant and local officials notified of
~ eeper's decision
all Owner(s) and officials notified of receipt of
Preliminary Information Form. Department of
Historic Resources archives checked for property
file and any additional information
III Owner(s) and officials informed of team
recommendation, notified of pending consideration
by State Review Board. Additional information
requested if necessary. In the case of historic
districts, public informational meetings may be held
at the request of the applicant or the locality
o Officials notified of review team
recommendations regarding Section 106 projects
III Owner(s) and officials notified of Board's
decision
all COMPLETE nomination due to Department of
Historic Resources by first day of the month prior
to the month of the State ReView Board and
Virginia Board of Historic Resources meetings at
which the nomination is to be considered
III Owner(s), adjacent .eroperty owners, consultant
and local officials notified by letter no less than 30
days prior to State Review Board meeting to initiate
30-day comment period
all In the case of a historic district, Department of
Historic Resources holds a public hearing within
the locality not less than thirty days prior to the
Board meetings and publishes legal notice in the
lor...al paper to initiate 30-day comment period
all Nomination presented at State Review Board
meeting, If approved, State Review Board
recommends that nomination be forwarded to
Keeper of the National Register; nominations
presented to Virginia Board of Historic Resources
If approved without owner objection will be listed
on the Virginia Landmarks Register on day of
presentation
all Nomination is forwarded to the Keeper of the
National Register in Washington, D.C.
all Following 45 day review period, Department is
notified of decision. If approved without owner
objection, property is listed on National Register. If
owners object, Keeper declares property eligible.
Subsequest owners may rescind objection.
I
. . ill' I SII t:J(2.
Distributed to Beard: I .~ ~-
..... ".,/~l .~)
.. I I '(-I' "~'-A
Agenlll Item No. ({L.L\"(' '.: ,)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond. Virginia 23219
TeD: (804) 786-1934
Telephone (804) 786-3143
FAX: (804) 225-4261
Hugh C Miller, Director
avid P. Bowerman, Chairman
lbemarle County Board of Supervisors
4 1 McIntire Road
harlottesville, V A 22901
: Michie Tavern, Albemarle County (DHR File NQ 02-93)
t its October 21 meeting, the State Review Board determined that the Michie Tavern appears
t meet the criteria for listing on the Virginia Landmarks Register and the National Register of
istoric Places. The staff of the Department of Historic Resources does not plan to prepare the
ational register nomination which is the required next step in the registration process, as our
ork program is fully scheduled for the remainder of the year and we normally limit our
reparation of nominations to those properties for which the Department is accepting an
sement.
hould the preparation of a nomination go forward you will be notified prior to any formal
ction by the Department or the Board. Thank you for your interest in the register program.
hould you have any questions or concerns regarding the registration process, please do not
esitate to contact me.
~~
ames Christian Hill
ational Register Assistant
!'()sl ()ji'i'(' lio.\' .}()()()(,
Nic!>II/1 I} 'd \ iJ'J,;illiil .} :;'}()f
I I
Distributed to B03r. d J.1.)."/~$.
Agenda Item Nf.l, 9.u1,i10{d.{:5j4)
.
VIRGINIA POWER
October 9, 1992
ocal Government Officials
Re: Application of virginia Electric and Power
Company for an Increase in Base Rates
Case No. PUE920041
ear Ladies and Gentlemen:
On September 30, 1992, the Virginia State corporation
ommission issued its Order of Notice and Hearing in the above-
eferenced proceeding. Pursuant to Paragraph No. 14, Virginia
ower is serving a copy of this Order upon the Chairman of the
oard of Supervisors of each county and upon the Mayor or Manager
f every city or town (or equivalent officials in counties, cities
nd towns having alternate forms of government) in which the
ompany offers service. A copy of this order is enclosed with this
etter. Please take notice of its contents. The Company expects
o introduce into evidence at ~he hearing beginning on March 8,
993 the testimony and exhibits supporting its Application for a
eneral Increase in Base Rates filed on May 29, 1992 and the
estimony and exhibits supporting the proposed revisions in its
ine Extension Plan filed on February 14, 1992. A complete copy of
his information may be obtained from Virginia Power at no cost by
ritten request to Mr. Kendrick R. Riggs, Virginia Power, P. O. Box
6666, Richmond, Virginia 23261 or by calling Mr. Riggs at (804)
71-3299.
~ td d2-. ~
K;hdrick R. Riggs
Senior Regulatory Counsel for
Virginia Power
nclosure
hearing should be held to receive relevant evidence.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) That, pursuant to Rule 7:1 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (-SCC Rules-), a Bearing Examiner is
appointed to conduct all further proceedings in this .atter;
(2) That a hearing before a Bearing Examiner is scheduled
for March 8, 1993 at 10:00 a.a. in the Commission's Courtroom on
the Second Floor of the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main Street,
Richmond, Virginia for the purpose of receiving evidence relevant
to the Company's application;
(3) That, on or before October 9, 1992, the Company shall
make copies of its application, supporting exhibits and prefiled
direct testimony available for public inspection during regular
business hours at all offices where customer bills may be paid;
(4) Discovery herein shall be conducted in accordance with
Part IV of the SCC Rules, except that after January 1, 1993,
Virginia Power and Protestant's shall respond to data requests
within ten (10) days and objections to all data requests on any
basis must be filed within five days after receipt of the data
requests by the party to whom the data requests are directed.
Any objection to data requests not timely raised may be subject
to waiver;
(5) That Company may file any necessary supplemental direct
testimony within three weeks from the issuance of a Final Order
in the Company's pending expedited rate case, Case No. PUE910047;
2
(6) That, on or before November 16, 1992, any person
desiring to participate .s a Protestant, as defined in SCC
Rule 4:6, shall file with ~e Clerk of the Commission an original
and twenty (20) copies of a notice of protest as provided in SCC
Rule 5:16(a) and shall serve a copy upon Kendrick R. Riggs,
Esquire, Virginia Electric and Power Company, P.O. Box 26666, One
James River Plaza, Richmond, Virginia 23219 and Evans B.
Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton' Williams, P.O. Box 1535, Riverfront
Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd street, Richmond, Virginia
23219;
(7) That within five days of receipt of any notice of
protest, Company shall serve upon each Protestant a copy of all
material now or hereafter filed with the Commission;
(8) That any person who expects to submit evidence, cross-
examine witnesses or otherwise participate in the proceedings as
a Protestant, .pursuant to SCC Rule 4:6, shall file on or before
February 1, 1993, an original and twenty (20) copies of a
protest with the Clerk ox the state Corporation Commission, c/o
Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, RiChmond, Virginia 23216
and simultaneously serve a copy thereof upon Company and upon
any other Protestant. The protest shall set forth (i) a precise
statement of the interest of the Protestant in the proceeding;
(ii) a full and clear statement of the facts which the Protestant
is prepared to prove by competent evidence; and (iii) a statement
of the specific relief sought and the legal basis therefor. Any
corporate entity ~t wishes to submit evidence, cross-examine
witnesses or otherwise participate as a Protestant must be
3
represented by legal counsel in accordance with the requirements
of SCC Rule 4:8;
(9) That, on or before February 1, 1993, each Protestant
shall file twenty (20) copies of the prepared testimony and
exhibits Protestant intends to present at the public hearing and
serve a copy upon Company and each other Protestant;
(10) That, on or before February 8, 1993, the Commission's
Staff shall file an original and twenty (20) copies of the
prepared testimony and exhibits Staff intends to present at the
public hearing and shall serve a copy upon Company and upon each
Protestant;
(11) That, on or before February 22, 1993, the Company
shall file with the Commission an original and twenty (20) copies
of all testimony it expects to introduce in rebuttal to all
direct prefiled testimony and ~xhibits; additional rebuttal
evidence may be presented by ~~e Company without prefiling,
provided it is in response to evidence which was not prefiled but
elicited at the time of the hearing and, provided further, the
need for additional rebuttal evidence is timely addressed by
motion during the hearing and leave to present said evidence is
granted by the Hearing Examiner. The Company shall serve a copy
of its prefiled rebuttal evidence upon all parties of record;
(12) That any person desiring to comment in writing on
Company's application may do so by directing such comments on or
before February 1, 1993, to the Clerk of the commission, c/o
Document Control center, P.o. Box 2118, RiChmond, Virginia 23216.
Such comments must refer to case No. PUE920041. Any person
4
desiring to make a statement at the public hearing concerning the
application need only appear in the Commission'. Courtroom on the
Second Floor of the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main Street,
Richmond, Virginia, on the day of the hearing and identify
himself or herself to the Bailiff as a public witness;
(13) That, on or before October 26, 1992, the Company shall
complete publication of the following notice to be published as
display advertising (not classified) once a week for two
consecutive weeks in newspapers of general circulation in
Company's service territory:
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF AN
APPLICATION FOR A GENERAL INCREASE
IN RATES BY VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
CASE NO. PUE920041
On May 29, 1992, Virginia Electric and
Power Company (WVirginia Powerw or wCompanyW)
filed an application with the State
Corporation Commission (Wthe CommissionW) of
Virginia for a general increase in its rates
and charges for ele~tric service (the w1992
Rate Case.) to produce total annual operating
revenues (including fuel) of $3,362,002,000
which is an increase of $165,864,000 over the
Company's annual operating revenues under the
interim rates that are presently in effect.
Those interim rates are subject to reduction
by the Commission in Case No. PUE910047 (wthe
1991 Rate CaseW), which is presently pending
before the Commission. Until the 1991 Rate
Case is concluded, the Company's finally
approved level of revenues in that case is
not known, and therefore, the increase in
revenues that Virginia Power is presently
seeking above that level cannot be determined.
The Commission has suspended Virginia
Power's proposed rates through October 26,
1992. The proposed rates may go into effect
on October 27, 1992, subject to refund,
pending the outcome of this investigation.
CUstomers receiving service under the
Company's Schedule 5 wSmall General Servicew
5
and Schedule 6 wLarge General Servicew should
take notice that Virginia Power, as part of
its request, plans to implement four new
general service schedules concurrent with the
interim rate increase on October 27, 1992.
Many commercial and industrial customers may
.ove from Schedule 5 or Schedule 6 to one of
the four new proposed general service
schedules at the time interim rates take
effect on October 27, 1992. Schedules 5 and
6 may not be available to new or additional
customers after this date. The Company has
also proposed numerous changes to its terms
and conditions for providing service,
including, among other changes, revisions in
the terms and conditions involving its line
extensions, charges for connection of the
supply of electricity, consolidated billing
and other miscellaneous charges.
Interested persons are encouraged to
review Virginia Power's.Application and
supporting documents for the details of the
proposed changes to the rates and terms and
conditions for providing electric service.
A public hearing on the application is
scheduled before a Hearing Examiner for
March 8, 1993, at 10:00 a.m. in the
Commission's Courtroom on the Second Floor of
the Tyler Building, ..1300 East Main Street,
Richmond, Virginia to receive evidence
relevant to Virginia Power's application.
Interested persons should be advised that
after considering all evidence the Commission
may prescribe rates for electric service
which differ from those appearing in Virginia
Power's application. Small and large
commercial and industrial customers should be
advised that Virginia Power's new Commercial
and Industrial rate schedules that become
effective on an interim basis October 27,
1992 may be further altered by the
Commission. After considering all the
evidence, the Commission may approve tariffs
with substantially different terms,
conditions, charges, and rates fro. those now
in effect and, also substantially different
from Virginia Power's proposed interim terms,
conditions, charges and rates.
A copy of Company's application is
available for public inspection during
regular business hours at any company office
6
where customer bills may be paid and at the
SCC Document Control Center, Floor B-1,
Jefferson Building, Bank and Governor
Streets, Richmond, Virginia.
Any person desiring to comment in
writing on the application ..y do so by
directing such comments on or before
February 1, 1993, to the Clerk of the
Commission as provided below. Any person
desiring to make a statement at the public
hearing, either for or against the
application, need only appear in the
Commission's Courtroom at 9:30 a.m. on the
day of the hearing and identify himself or
herself to the Bailiff as a public witness.
On or before November 16, 1992, persons
desiring to participate as Protestants, as
defined in Rule 4:6 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (WSCC RulesW) and
to present evidence and cross-examine
witnesses, shall file an original and twenty
(20) copies of a notice of protest as
described in SCC Rule 5:16(a), with the Clerk
of the Commission at the address set forth
below and serve a copy on Virginia Power.
Service upon Virginia Power shall be directed
to Kendrick R. Riggs, Esquire, P.O.
Box 26666, Richmond, Virginia 23261.
Any person who expects to submit
evidence, cross-examine witnesses or
otherwise participate in the proceedings as a
Protestant, pursuant to SCC Rule 4:6, shall
file on or before February 1, 1993, an
original and twenty (20) copies of a protest
with the Clerk of the State Corporation
Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.O.
Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216 and
simultaneously serve a copy thereof upon
Company and upon any other Protestant. The
protest shall set forth (i) a precise
statement of the interest of the Protestant
in the proceeding; (ii) a full and clear
statement of the facts which the Protestant
is prepared to prove by competent evidence;
and (iii) a statement of the specific relief
sought and the legal basis therefor. Any
corporate entity that wishes to submit
evidence, cross-examine witnesses or
otherwise participate as a Protestant must be
represented by legal counsel in accordance
with the requirements of SCC Rule 4:8
7
On or before February 1, 1993, each
Protestant shall file twenty (20) copies of
the prepared testimony and exhibits
Protestant intend. to present at the hearing
and shall serve a copy upon Company and upon
any other Protestant.
All written communications to the
Commission regarding this case should be
directed to William J. Bridge, Clerk,
Virginia State Corporation Commission,
Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118,
Richmond, Virginia 23216 and should refer to
Case No. PUE920041.
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
(14) That, on o'r before October 16, 1992, Virginia Power
shal.l serve a copy of this Order upon the chairman of the board
of supervisors of each county and upon the mayor or manager of
every city or town (or equivalent officials in counties, cities
and towns having alternate forms of government) in which the
Company offers service. Service shall be made by first-class
mail to the customary place of business or the residence of the
person served;
(15) That, at the commencement of the hearing scheduled
herein, the Company provide the Commission proof of notice and
service required by paragraphs (13) and (14) herein.
AN ATTESTED COpy hereof shall be sent by the Clerk of the
Commission to Kendrick R. Riggs, Esquire, Virginia Electric ,
Power Company, P.O. Box 26666, Richmond, Virginia 23261; Evans B.
Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton , Williams, Riverfront Plaza, East
Tower, 951 East Byrd street, RiChmond, Virginia 23219-4074;
Office of the Attorney General, Division of Consumer Counsel,
101 North 8th street, 6th Floor, RiChmond, Virginia 23219;
8
. ,
Frann G. Francis, Esquire, Apartment , Office Buildinq
Association, 1050 17th street, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, D.C.
20036; Louis R. Konacell, Esquire, Virqinia Committee for Fair
Utility Rates, 1200 Mutual Building, Richmond, Virginia 23219-
3095; Jean Ann Fox, President, Virginia citizens Consumer
Council, 114 Coachman Drive, Tabb, Virginia 23693; and to the
Commission's Divisions of Public Utility Accounting, Economics
and Finance and Energy Regulation.
A True Copy l{}i1.e~'1 s. ~
~~ n
Clerk of the U
State Corporation Commission
9
~
"
Distributed to Boaid: JQ/3),~
i\genda Item No. qzJjD_~5 /5)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
CORRECTED COPY
October 21, 1992
Pete Bradshaw
Keswick Acquisition Corporation
P.O. Box 68
Keswick, Virginia 22947
Re: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - Section 10.3.1;
Tax Map 80, Parcels 8, 60, 61, 62, and 109A
Dear Mr. Bradshaw,
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the information you have
submi tted for the above-noted properties. It is the County
Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination, that
these five (5) consist of ten (10) separate parcels.
These parcels are as follows:
(1) Parcel 8 which is in two completely separate pieces, with no
points touching, and a distance of approximately 2000 feet
apart. It consists of:
Parcel 8 east of 52.5 acres, with 5 potential development
rights; and
Parcel 8 west of 22.4 acres, with 5 potential development
rights;
(2) Parcel 60 which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and located on either side of 1-64. It consists of:
Parcel 60 north of the Interstate, with the majority of the
8.057 combined acres, with unknown potential development
rights; and
Parcel 60 south of the Interstate, with the lesser acreage,
with unknown potential development rights.
October 21, 1992
Peter Bradshaw/Deter. of Parcel
Page 2
(3) Parcel 61 which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and a distance of approximately 1000 feet apart. It
consists of:
Parcel 61 east of 33.8 acres, with 5 potential development
rights; and
Parcel 61 west of 12 acres, with 5 potential development
rights;
(4) Parcel 62 which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and located on either side of I-64. It consists of:
Parcel 62 north of the Interstate, with the majority of
the 57.440 combined acres, with 5 potential development
rights; and
Parcel 62 south of the Interstate, with the lesser
acreage, with unknown potential development rights.
(5) Parcel 109A which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and located on either side of the C & 0 Railroad
right-of-way. It consists of:
Parcel 109A north of the Railroad, with the minority of the
29.286 combined acres, with unknown potential development
rights; and
Parcel 109A south of the Railroad, with the majority of the
acreage, with 5 potential development rights.
~ach of these lawfully separate parcels in entitled to associated
~evelopment rights, based on the acreage and buildability of the
property. This determination results in five (5) additional
parcels than are shown with a parcel number on the County tax maps.
~his determination considered the findings of the Albemarle Circuit
~ourt in the case of Ann H. Sanford v. Board of Zoninq Appeals of
~lbemarle County Virqinia, and city of Winston Salem v. Tickle.
~81 2d 667, of the North Carolina Court of Appeals (1981). These
~ases determined that ownership by another, whether the
~ommonwealth of Virginia for highway right-of-way, or the Railroad
c~r the like, serves to sever the common ownership of the property,
nd therefore also subdivide it into separate parcels.
.
October 21, 1992
Peter Bradshaw/Deter. of Parcel
Page 3
Anyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have any
questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Amelia
Zoning
Ji 1tvv r j 1 pO, ..
G. MCCUlley:~~~p.
Administrator
AGM/
cc: Jan Sprinkle, Planning Department
Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
Rich Tarbell, Planning Department
Reading Files
OTE: Five (5) parcels by Tax Map, ten (10) by determination
Five (5) additional lots
;
...
'.
/ /, 1\, ( tj .......
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
October 21, 1992
ete Bradshaw
eswick Acquisition Corporation
.0. Box 68
eswick, Virginia 22947
OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - Section 10.3.1;
Tax Map 80, Parcels 8, 60, 61, 62, and 109A
Mr. Bradshaw,
he County Attorney and I have reviewed the information you have
ubmi tted for the above-noted properties. It is the County
ttorney's advisory opinion and my official determination, that
hese six (6) parcels consist of twelve (12) separate parcels.
hese parcels are as follows:
(1) Parcel 8 which is in two completely separate pieces, with no
points touching, and a distance of approximately 2000 feet
apart. It consists of:
Parcel 8 east of 52.5 acres, with 5 potential development
rights; and
Parcel 8 west of 22.4 acres, with 5 potential development
rights;
(2) Parcel 60 which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and located on either side of 1-64. It consists of:
Parcel 60 north of the Interstate, with the majority of the
8.057 combined acres, with unknown potential development
rights; and
Parcel 60 south of the Interstate, with the lesser acreage,
with unknown potential development rights.
~ ~
October 21, 1992
Peter Bradshaw/Deter. of Parcel
Page 2
(3) Parcel 61 which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and a distance of approximately 1000 feet apart. It
consists of:
Parcel 61 east of 33.8 acres, with 5 potential development
rights; and
Parcel 61 west of 12 acres, with 5 potential development
rights;
(4) Parcel 62 which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and located on either side of 1-64. It consists of:
Parcel 62 north of the Interstate, with the majority of
the 57.440 combined acres, with 5 potential development
rights; and
Parcel 62 south of the Interstate, with the lesser
acreage, with unknown potential development rights.
(5) Parcel 109A which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and located on either side of the C & 0 Railroad
right-of-way. It consists of:
Parcel 109A north of the Railroad, with the minority of the
29.286 combined acres, with unknown potential development
rights; and
Parcel 109A south of the Railroad, with the majority of the
acreage, with 5 potential development rights.
~ach of these lawfully separate parcels in entitled to associated
~evelopment rights, based on the acreage and buildability of the
broperty. This determination results in 6 additional parcels than
~re shown with a parcel number on the County tax maps.
~his determination considered the findings of the Albemarle Circuit
pourt in the case of Ann H. Sanford v. Board of Zoninq Appeals of
~lbemarle Countv. Virainia, and city of winston Salem v. Tickle,
~81 2d 667, of the North Carolina Court of Appeals (1981). These
~ases determined that ownership by another, whether the
Commonwealth of Virginia for highway right-of-way, or the Railroad
pr the like, serves to sever the common ownership of the property,
~nd therefore also subdivide it into separate parcels.
I
" .
October 21, 1992
Peter Bradshaw/Deter. of Parcel
Page 3
Anyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. I f you have any
questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
~4, 1AA ~(II ~a, . /
Amelia G. MC~~~l~C.P.
Zoning Administrator
AGM/
cc: Jan Sprinkle, Planning Department
Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
Rich Tarbell, Planning Department
Reading Files
OTE: six (6) parcels by Tax Map, twelve (12) by determination
six (6) additional lots
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
SECOND CORRECTION
P te Bradshaw
K swick Acquisition Corporation
P.O. Box 68
K swick, Virginia 22947
OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - Section 10.3.1;
Tax Map 80, Parcels 8, 60, 61, 62, (109A and 110, now 109A and
109B);
Mr. Bradshaw,
letter reflects reV1.S1.ons resul ting from addi tional
i formation you have submitted. This information includes most
s"gnificantly, a recorded plat for parcels 109A and 110, confirming
t e existence of two (2) parcels of record, with a total of six (6)
d velopment rights in new combined parcel 109A. This property is
s bject to the current Keswick special permit application. This
p at was signed by the Department of Planning and community
D velopment on September 13, 1991, with CSX Transportation, Inc. as
t e property owner. These two parcels, parcel 109A (part) and 110,
w re shown as two separate parcels on the County tax maps, and both
w re subdivided by the CSX Railroad right-of-way. The current tax
m ps reflect the recordation of this plat, and show new parcel
109A, the combination of the portions of parcels 109A and 110 lying
o the south side of the Railroad, and new parcel 109B, the
c ination of the portions of parcels 109A and 110 lying on the
north side of the Railroad. This plat is attached.
T e County Attorney and I have reviewed the information you have
su mitted for the above-noted properties" It is the County
At orney's advisory opinion and my official determination, that
these six (6) parcels of record on the date of adoption of the
Or inance (12-10-1980), consist of twelve (12) separate parcels.
o tober 29, 1992
P te Bradshaw/Keswick Deter. of Parcel
P ge 2
T ese parcels are as follows:
( ) Parcel 8 which is in two completely separate pieces, with no
points touching, and a distance of approximately 2000 feet
apart. It consists of:
Parcel 8 east of 52.5 acres, with 5 potential development
rights; and
Parcel 8 west of 22.4 acres, with 5 potential development
rights;
( ) Parcel 60 which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and located on either side of 1-64. It consists of:
Parcel 60 north of the Interstate, with the majority of the
8.057 combined acres, with four (4) potential development
rights; and
Parcel 60 south of the Interstate, with the lesser acreage,
with unknown potential development rights.
( ) Parcel 61 which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and a distance of approximately 1000 feet apart.
consists of:
It
,
Parcel 61 east of 33.8 acres, with 5 potential development
rights; and
Parcel 61 west of 12 acres, with 5 potential development
rights;
( ) Parcel 62 which is in two separate pieces, with no points
touching, and located on either side of 1-64. It consists of:
Parcel 62 north of the Interstate, with the majority of
the 57.440 combined acres, with 5 potential development
rights; and
Parcel 62 south of the Interstate, with the lesser
acreage, with unknown potential development rights.
( ) Parcel 109A which was created from two separate tax map
parcels. At the date of adoption of the ordinance, each of
these two separate parcels was in two separate pieces, with no
points touching, and located on either side of the C & 0
Railroad right-of-way. The two parcels consisted of:
(a) Parcel 109A; and (b) Parcel 110.
tober 29, 1992
te Bradshaw/Keswick Deter. of Parcel
ge 3
e property subject to the Keswick special permit application
cludes Parcel 109A south of the Railroad, of 29.286 acres, with
x (6) potential development rights. This property in fact,
nsists of two (2) separate parcels of record on the date of
dinance adoption. One was formerly a portion of parcel 109A (DB
1, page 278), and the other was a portion of parcel 110 (DB 270,
ge 548).
the same plat approved by the County on September 13, 1991, the
rtions of then parcels 109A and 110 located on the north side of
e Railroad were combined into one parcel, as were those on the
s uth side. The new combined parcel 109B, consists of 8.53 acres
w'th unknown potential development rights.
ch of these lawfully separate parcels in entitled to associated
velopment rights, based on the acreage and buildability of the
operty. This determination results in six (6) additional parcels
an are shown with a parcel number on the County tax maps.
is determination considered the findings of the Albemarle Circuit
urt in the case of Ann H. Sanford v. Board of Zoninq Appeals of
bemarle Count Vir inia, and city of winston Salem v. Tickle.
1 2d 667, of the North Carolina Court of Appeals (1981). These
ses determined that ownership by another, whether th~
mmonwealth of Virginia for highway right-of-way, or the Railroad
the like, serves to sever the common ownership of the property,
d therefore also subdivide it into separate parcels.
yone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
irty (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have any
estions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
'~L ;tir1l1~ f;~a'J
elia G. MCCUlley~~~(c.P.
ning Administrator
Jan Sprinkle, Planning Department
Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
Rich Tarbell, Planning Department
Reading Files
N TE: six (6) parcels by Tax Map, twelve (12) by determination
six (6) additional lots
. ,
MAGNETIC NO RTP
APPROVED FOR RECORDAT'ON
~cJ.u..hu>A
Direc,.o,'--ci1 Planninq~.
~'\?'''3\
Dole
\01
';'0\ t>,'J
o 'J
V-. "" ..,0 9.
~. 0. CI
\)Y.
TII( SU8OlVlSlOHor H<<.lNoC[)UC"'BUII'-.-t..
IS ""11 11<< 'Rtf. CC)JOlHl NO IN ACCQflt',vK[
"'1111 t~ ocs...[ 0* h<(; \,N;IUI_O 0_1l:.
~"Of'ftI:'OA'. AfCllI'l1JS1,n. IJ,JN RUtRLN<;t 10
f"UllMt 'OIl.NllAl Of:VLLOf'KHI I'll 10 II(
OU.WED"" It<l(Olll[TIC.t.L QN..'f. lO.l..l. nAllloflOfU
...nlXlD TO lHS ""'.1.' AII[ TRv( oUC) c.ORfIlf.T 10
Tilt !lOT N ",,_~lD(t[./. _ ) ,/. /.
~~~._0:L~
VICINIT
\
MAP
/ \01c'
,;,ot 'Jr>.'J
coO
h<( S\J6l.JI\,II!I"-!N or hor.: LAt.() DUtRO(D IlERltl
IS W\1III>': '''ll Coo.'()H "'~""c.tOffOAt4U
"'11.\ HI[ DUll( Of hI( U<<.RSIGt<D O"N:JIl,
~RuP"I['()l's. .ucl',",,'TlU. AJ<f "'U"IJII~ TO
11IT""["O'0I1IA.LOl\l[LOf'~'.TO.f.
O([MLC..., T OIl(IItAI. OM.l'. ALL SUHK.IlU
".HUlD 1 Pl...T -.At lRV( .\N:l CORh(CT TO
I,IIf..'" K)f() OG(.
"
'SCtL4tL~ a.f'
1<12-
SITE DATA
OWNER: . B O. RAILWAY CO.
10 L.J. BORNTRAEGER
00 WATER ST.
ACKSONVILLE, FLA. 32202
ONED: RA
EGAL REF. O.B. 271 P. 276
D. 6.270 P. 546
DENOTES IRONS OR
IPES FOUND OR SET. I
AX MAp.60 PAR. 109A RETAINS
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
. M. 60 PAR.1l0IPORTlONJ
TAINS 2 DEVELOPMEI(T RIGHT;. ><
RESIDU OF PARCEL r09A' e.S3tAC.1 C/)
RES IOU OF PARCEL II0(Troct Portion) (j
TO BE ODED TO 6 BECOME PART OF
PARCE I09A RESIDUE. ~
~.I~~'~C. PARCEL RETAffi I OEVELOPME ~ ~
29.286 c.Porcel 8 Residue otl09A T.M. BOPor. '~""//
Each ove in excess .of 30,000 70' D S 270 p 54B ""---/.-;;......~ ~ 0", ~ ""I Iii .~';:;\
conti uaus s.f. at buildable area '" /"::-.. ~"'.... I -;,. F'" ->:1JI 0 ....
with lopes less than 250/0 a - ~ 'cr" 7" c: ~ ,..,.........4:~ . ---?/ -..~/ /-- ..,/ ~
leng! to width ratio of 5: I. I is _ '", :;:..:~~ -:; - f'r---;:~~ __
I ~ 0 .~ .r'\'~/OO~ #/~. ---
~- ~.ra ~ t- ('...I - "U) Si _ -- \Ol{\ r 0
~^ I r~V)~-. ~.........~"'",~ "'''";::l' -:>-aonoo6? ~(.'Og~10
- ~II.~;; .~'-~:n/~(.O ~ ~ --- ;4 ~O \lo1
I ~ \is -! ~j;';- ~""""""'(l\ ....--; lOa'" ~ ~,\.",g
e: ....., ;:; '6 <X> .. ....,=-- \- S\\~"'\\, 0\ "" ().
t V) ~ v - ".r~/ ___ u,..
"- <- ~ ~:::> 2: "";e"/ 110 'r- ~~~,o<.
o ~ g ~ IOO'?o From pOlO' A' to pOint'S' property line follows 't. of
streom os it meanders. Principal courses ore shown.
PLAT SHOWING
A SURVEY OF PARCEL X
CONTAINING 29.286 ACRES
PORTION OF PARCELS 109A a 110 TAX MAP 80
PROPERTY OF CSX TRANSPORTATION,INC.
AT KESWICK
RIVANNA DISTRICT
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
I
fl
\; I
q
A
(' \l \,J
J
SCAL ....J" =200'
DATE: _"1..~3..Q,L9..~J
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOC., INC,
A Professional Corporation
CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR - ENGINEER
Charlottesville. Virginia
I r (' ?91
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
'3
13
\ /
\(><'
/\. /.
.L \ //su
\ "",,-,..-tlM
""
$CAlL ,.. r" T
RIVAN~A DtSTRICT
SECTLON 80
lllCSWJ(Il., IC _LOCH AGAtCUl.1UIIIM. a ro"t:ITM,. DIIT.teTl
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
9
"--
.1
9,
.~
\
\.\ (
/.\ /.
L \ //...
\ ~.".1I"
""
><,/
SGALL IN f" T
.~
RIVANNA
DtSTRICT
SECTLON
80
IICOWt(K..
_LOCH AGI!IICULTUIIAI. a fOIllIITAL. DIITA.en
',.-. ~
. . . 1/' 1:4'.) 10 7
D:stnbuted to B~fd -'::::./~!ll:::.- \
Agenda Item "jD. _1Z ...'_&Y./:).! (~J)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
October 22, 1992
Bruce W. and Bonnie M. Kirtley
Route 1, Box 405
Crozet, Virginia 22932
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - section 10.3.1;
Tax Map 55, Parcel 99
Dear Mr. and Ms. Kirtley,
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the information you have
submitted for the above-noted property. It is the County
ttorney's advisory opinion and my official determination, that at
the date of adoption of the Zoning Ordinance, this property
consisted of two (2) separate parcels:
(1) Parcel 99, consisting of 3.83 acres; and
(2) A parcel which was not numbered, and was owned by the
Commonwealth of Virginia, consisting of approximately 0.9
acres.
ach of these lawfully separate parcels is entitled to one (1)
evelopment right. This determination results in one (1)
dditional parcel than is shown with a parcel number on the County
ax maps.
his determination considered the findings of the Albemarle Circuit
ourt in the case of Ann H. Sanford v. Board of Zoninq Appeals of
lbemarle Count Vir inia, and City of winston Salem v. Tickle,
81 2d 667, of the North Carolina Court of Appeals (1981). These
ases determined that ownership by another, such as for the
nterstate right-of-way, serves to sever the common ownership of
he property, thereby subdividing it into separate parcels.
.'-0 '_
October 22, 1992
Bruce and Bonnie Kirtley
Page 2
The 0.868 acres was created by the acquisition of right-of-way for
the Interstate. It was originally part of the Monroe Wood estate,
which was severed into this northern parcel which was acquired by
the state, and a residue lying south of the Interstate. This
subdivision was recorded in Deed Book 420, Page 587, and was dated
April 8, 1966.
On October 5, 1983, recorded in Deed Book 780, Page 275, this
parcel less a small area reserved for road maintenance, was sold to
you as adjoining owners. Provided that it is buildable, I
understand that you intend to build a house and redivide the land
to create two fairly equal lots.
Anyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have any
questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
~~ )[ 0Y1~ 1', ~/)/11
Amelia G. MCCUll~C.P.
Zoning Administrator
GM/
cc: Jan Sprinkle, Planning Department
Gay Carver, Real Estate
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
Reading File
Marilyn Gale
OTE:
ne (1) additional parcel;
ne (1) by Tax Map, two (2) by determination
,
.
., !:3J!I:lZ-
D:s.hih,'~ ", "' .1 \U \-_...:..._
gz .;; ,C,:,
Agenda i(~I:1 ,.. - - _!"~......)
1992
THIRD QUARTER
BUILDING REPORT
County of Albemarle
Department of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
INDEX
I~ Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month (Charts A - B)
It Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Type (Charts C - D)
Ill. Comparison of AU Building Permits (Chart E)
]~ Comparison of Certificates of Occupancy (Charts F - H)
Key to Types of Housing Used in this Report
SF Single Family (Includes Modular)
SFA Single Family Attached
SFffH Single Family Townhouse
DUP Duplex
MF Multi-Family Residence
MHC MobileHomes in County
I
A
-2-
During the third quarter of 1992, 231 permits were issued for
236 dwelling units. In addition, 16 permits were issued for mobile
homes in existing parks at an average exchange value of $2,500 for a
total of $40,000. Of the aforementioned permits, 48 are condominiums.
I. COMPARISON OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY MONTH
Chart A. Nine Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling
Units by Month
YEAR 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
JAN 86 46 37 38 22 93 56 64 183
FEB 39 29 43 35 40 172 68 31 72
MAR 78 94 37 62 91 61 92 57 64
APR 60 48 78 70 71 49 82 62 72
MAY 78 121 73 73 83 89 75 44 62
JUN 66 60 92 56 83 220 85 54 48
Jut 63 57 159 80 30 67 42 58 62
AUG 47 86 32 46 49 74 87 58 126
SEP 52 35 49 45 46 72 90 55 48
OCT 41 40 52 60 52 56 48 39 0
NOV 33 45 50 49 60 301 37 42 0
DEC 82 53 35 40 46 55 42 50 0
TOTAL 725 714 737 654 673 1309 804 614 737
Chart B. Three Year ComparisQn of New Residential Dwelling
Uni ts by Month
190
.100
170
1m
1=0
140
13:)
1:10
110
100
90
00
70
00
=0
40
3:)
:10
10
o
-
- /
- / [7 /
- / 1/ "/
./ / 1./ ./ ./
- /1-< 1/, "<: ~
-V" / I" 1/ / " /f'.-
-v'\ ./ /i'- 1./'\ / ~ '\ /1'\ '\ / ".-'\
V f'.- 1/ / 1/" f'.- 0- I" l"- V"
-v I" 1/'., v I"- 1/" /"- /f'.- V"
-1/ '\ II /[\ v'\ 1/ r\ 1/'\ /1'\ ~ /1'\ ~ v\
_V"' v "- 1/ 1/ f'.- 1/" /"- f'.- I' V
1/ "- /"- 1/ I" 1/ "- I' /"- f'.- v"
I I I
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JLL ALG sa:> OCT NOV CEC
I22J 1990
lS:SJ 1 9'91
~ 19'92
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
- .
..
~
.
-3-
THIRD QUARTER 1992
II. COMPARISON OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY TYPE
Chart C. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by
Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type
MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL % TOTAL
DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC D.U. D.U.
CHARLOTTESVILLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
JACK JOUETT 5 0 0 0 54 0 59 25%
RIVANNA 33 43 22 0 0 0 98 42%
SAMUEL MILLER 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 8%
SCOTTSVILLE 29 7 0 0 0 2 38 16%
WHITE HALL 15 4 0 0 0 2 21 9%
TOTAL 102 54 22 0 54 4 236 100%
Chart D. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by
Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type
DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS
COMP PLAN AREA SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC URBAN RURAL
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 1 0 10 0 0 0 11
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 10 7 0 0 0 0 17
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 54 0 54
CROZET COMMUNITY 6 4 0 0 0 0 10
HOLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 16 0 12 0 0 0 28
SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EARLYSVILLE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0
PINEY MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 1 43 0 0 0 0 44
RIVANNA VILLAGE 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GROWTH AREA SUBTOTAL 39 54 22 0 54 0 169
RURAL AREA 1 11 0 0 0 0 2 13
RURAL AREA 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 10
RURAL AREA 3 22 0 0 0 0 1 23
RURAL AREA 4 20 0 0 0 0 1 21
RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 63 0 0 0 0 4 67
TOTAL 102 54 22 0 54 4 236
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
I
-4-
THIRD QlARTER 1992
III. CCMPARISON OF ALL BUILDING PERMITS
Ctart E. Estimated Cost of Construction by Magisterial District and Construction Type
MAGISTEFIAL NEW *NEW NON-RES. NEW COMMERCIAL FARM BULDING
DISTRIC T RESIDENTIAL & ALTER. RES. & NEW INSTlTUT. & ALTER. COMM. TOTAL
No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$
CHVILLE 0 0 15 122,859 1 1,000,000 12 682,000 28 1,804,859
JOUETT 54 5,360,000 19 2,193,081 2 18,675 3 3,300 78 7,575,056
RIVANNA 98 6,198,278 47 422,351 5 600,000 10 158,200 160 7,378,829
S. MILLER 20 3,274,200 54 1,012,382 2 159,500 9 75,800 85 4,521,882
SCOTTSV1LLE 38 2,812,972 38 496,025 5 107,500 6 132,600 87 3,549,097
WHITE HP. LL 21 2,398,054 60 878,496 1 6,500 9 104,719 91 3,387,769
TOTAl 231 20,043,504 233 5,125,194 16 1,892,175 49 1,156,619 529 28,217,492
* Additional value of mobile homes placed in existing parks is included in Residential
Altere tion category.
.
IV. CEB~IFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
Chart F. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Elementary
School District: and Dwelling Unit Type
SCHOOL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL PERCENT
DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC D.U. TOTAL D.U.
Agrpr-Hurt 6 0 11 0 0 0 17 6.94%
Bro~dus Wood/Henley 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 1. 22%
Bro~dus Wood/Jouett 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.22%
Brolwnsville 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.63%
Crolzet 7 7 0 0 C 14 5.71%
Gre~r 1 0 0 0 24 0 25 10.20%
Hol~ymead 30 1 4 0 0 0 35 14.29%
Mer~wether Lewis 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 2.86%
Murl.-ay 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 3.27%
Red Hi 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.63%
Ca1~/Bur1ey 0 0 0 0 24 0 24 9.80%
Ca1~/Wa1ton 28 6 0 0 0 0 34 13 . 88%
Scolttsville 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.22%
Stone Robinson/Burley 8 0 0 0 36 0 44 17.96%
Stope Robinson/Walton 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 1. 63%
Stopy Point 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 5.71%
Woo~brook 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Yanf.ey 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.82%
TOTAL 131 14 15 0 84 1 245 100.00%
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
- .
.
.
.
-5-
THIRD QUARTER 1992
IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY (continued)
Chart G. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by
Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type
MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE
DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC TOTAL
CHARLOTTESVILLE 6 0 2 0 0 0 8
JACK JOUETT 4 0 0 0 24 0 28
RIVANNA 52 1 13 '0 60 0 126
SAMUEL MILLER 25 0 0 0 0 0 25
SCOTTSVILLE 28 6 0 0 0 0 34
WHITE HALL 16 7 0 0 0 1 24
TOTAL 131 14 15 0 84 1 245
Chart H. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by
Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type
DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS
COMP PLAN AREA SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC URBAN RURAL
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 6 0 11 0 0 0 17
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 60 0 60
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 16 6 0 0 0 0 22
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 11
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 24 0 24
CROZET COMMUNITY 5 7 0 0 0 0 12
hJLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 29 0 4 0 0 0 33
SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EARLYSVILLE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PINEY MTN. VILLAGE 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
RIVANNA VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GROWTH AREA SUBTOTAL 68 14 15 0 84 0 181
RURAL AREA 1 11 0 0 0 0 1 12
RURAL AREA 2 21 0 0 0 0 0 21
RURAL AREA 3 18 0 0 0 0 0 18
RURAL AREA 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 13
RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 63 0 0 0 0 1 64
TOTAL 131 14 15 0 84 1 245
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
I ,
Vistributeo...to soa~d.:~'.D :~.. t.. iZ
. ens ~.
Agen()a It..,,, ;.io. -if.:. "'_._ ~eL J bemarle
luvanna
Louisa
Nelson
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
THOMAS JEFFERSON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
401 Mcintire Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22901
(804) 977-8236
0:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Stephen M. Murray, Chairman~
Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District
Quarterly Report
ROM:
E:
ATE:
October 21, 1992
nclosed you will find a Quarterly Report of activities of the
homas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District during
he months of July, August, and September of 1992. Our
istrict plans to begin submitting such quarterly and annual
eports to the four counties we serve. Feel free to contact
he District office if you have questions or comments
egarding our services.
would also like to remind you that our meetings are held at
:30 a.m. on the fourth Wednesday of each month. The meetings
re open to the public and we would welcome your input.
c: County Administrators and Executives
...
...: 10001i recycled paper
.
1_______
1-------
1
1
1______-
1
IErosion
1-------
IAssists
I prof
1-------
IBond es
1-------
ISite pI
1______-
I
'Assists
THOMAS JEFFERSON SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
QUARTERLY REPORT:
JULY, AUGUST, SEPTEMBER 1992
======= I ======:
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
and Sediment Control Plans Reviewed
to developers, engineers,
ssional plan designers, etc.
imates determined
to agricultural landowners
Best Ma agement Practices installed
Cons Crop System (Acres)
Cons Till System (Acres)
Cover & Green Man Crop (Acres)
Critical Area Planting (Acres)
Fencing (Feet)
Past/Hay Mgmt (Acres)
Past/Hay Planting (Acres)
Strip Cropping
(Acres)
---------
---------
-------
-------
Tree Planting
(Acres)
ALB
NEL
Livestock Watering Facility (No.)
N/A
o
N/A
N/A
5
8
21
750
21
FLU LOU
4
o 41
2
014
N/A 12
5
N/A N/A
18 40
313
1495
735
21
-------,-------
313
1528
107
21
o I
---______1______-
1
3200 I 0
---______1______-
1
341 I
53
---------,-------
o
o
o
1
Farm Bi I Conservation Plans Completed (Acres)
Farm Bi 1 Conservation Plans Revised (Acres)
(Tracts)
WRPA Co servation Plans Completed
WRPA Co servation Plans Revised (Tracts)
State Cst-Share funds distributed
Educati nal Programs conducted
Newslet ers distributed
N/A N/A I N/A
------- -------,-------
1
o I 0 I 0
-------1-------1-------
o I 0 1 0
-------1-------1-------
142 7
661
3148
14 N/A
2
$3,627
o
o
164
o
o
o
o
o
180
301
o
8
40
o
o
9
o
o
o
1
o
4
o I 507
------- , -------
1
3696 I 14468
------- , ------.
1
N/A I N/A
------- , -------
I
720
390 I .' 277 I
313
------- ------------------------------------- --------------------------------_.
------- ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------.
Technic 1 Staff Hours
District
Soil Conservation Service
Clerica Staff Hours
Volunte
------- -------------------------------------
------- -------------------------------------
1
1
1---------1-------
1 134 1
!(WRPA:86)1 91
---------1-------
520 I 364
---------1-------
88 I 63
---------.-------
1
21 I 5
---------1-------
---------1-------
58 213
338 858
170 241
5. 5
------- , --..:..---.
------- I -------
.L
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
70istributed to tloareJ: l~_~Jql
. . ()1 IJ'A II h; <77 \
Agenda It~m ~iO. lL.t-l. .u~\_:..D-'-v )
/
..
.. ,
I
MEMORANDUM
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
of Supervisors ~
...----
County Executive I
-.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board
October 30, 1992
county/City Shared Services - purchasinq Division
A tached is the charge and scope of work developed for analyzing
t e purchasing divisions of the County and City. While significant
s aff time is being devoted to preparing this report for Board and
C uncil, it is felt that the various issues identified for analysis
w 11 take longer than earlier anticipated. As soon as the report
i completed, however, it will be submitted for your review.
S
f
any questions concerning this matter, please feel
me.
R jr/bat
9 -23
A tachment
,
~ .. .'\,.
\.
SHARED SERVICES - PURCHASING OPERATIONS
GE: . Analyze City/County purchasing operations
. Produce a report on options/costs/savings/efficiency
methods associated with the potential combining of
operations.
stAFF TEAMS:
citv
Countv
Linda Peacock
Rita Scott
Al Elias
Richard Huff
Melvin Breeden
Calvin Jones
I SUES TO ANALYZE:
. Volume of business? Dollars and purchase orders?
. Per unit costs of goods purchased?
. Types (breadth) of services offered?
. Workload impacts?
. If combined, where should operations be located?
. If combined, for whom would staff work? Salary and
benefit issues?
. Monetary savings? Costs?
. Joint contract alternatives?
. Contracting with one or other to provide services?
. Refine/make common purchasing regulations/manuals?
. Response time?
. city schools? How are they doing purchasing
(centralized or decentralized)? What volume of
purchases?
. Warehouse operations? Delivery issues?
. Amount bought on State contract (total
purchases/types)?
. If shared services occurred, is there some way to
measure quality of service?
R Tjr/bat
9 -23
..
..~(,~J ...r.r.s.f
'-, .~
c..:) -::'_../
-~ I
. : 1''-.\1
-e (3--'
'"
<;:'
r:.:::l ;'t
o
,.J '"
;J ~
...-
=--' t't'l
..0 <:l
-E c:
(J") ~
o ..~
rn
z
o b:
~ 2
w W
Q. a: C\I
o ~ m
> 0 -
z.... z a:
:J <( ~
o ~ :::E
o LL W
W ~ b:
...J :I: W
a: .... rn
<( z
:::E 0
~ :::E
~
I-
Z
W
~
W
Q.
* * * * * *1 '#.
V(\')VT-OCDO
C\I CD(\') (\')0 10_
~NN<OOLrio;
T-C\I
* * *1 *
(0 vO) 10
01'-000
OO~O
C') C\I
***
C\101O
v(OC')
<0..0<0
T- T- T-
~
en
r--:
-
W
~
~
:I:
o
~ g ~ ~~~IIO
<X> v 10
o:ftD
T- T-
0T-
o
-
-
o
-
o
-
C\I
o
C\I-.
en
CD
;
-
~tij
~8
~ffi
I'- <X> 10 0> <X> 101 C\I
T-I'-OOI'-T-OCl)
CD1OI'-OOo)I'-v
tD m tD .,.: 10- 10 cD
T-~O(O(\,)I'-o
CD_ (\')_1'-(\')_0) V
0) V0T-V.
10 C\I 00-
o 0 en
o
ffi
:J
Z
W
[1j
a:
(/)
o
5' Z
Z -=:Jrn
-=:J LLW
LL .- <!J :J
....J~ ZZ
~O ZZ~
WO (/)~W
ZI a:(/)a: rn
~~ ~W-=:J-J W
__ LL(/)< rn
....J....Jw (/)11- Z
<(<(t-WZLLO W
0000~@~u:l1- ~
....J....J(/)LLt-(/) W
IX) v Oi C\I
I'-T-OO)
C\lvl'-C')
1O-O)-(\') ai
C\lI'-OOOO
0>10100
.,.: C')- CD C\i
C\l00C')
o 0
(/)
Z t-
O Z
i= W
~ ~
W a:
0.. W
o >
t- 0
6]~ ~
~t- ~
ZZ W
a:w Z
W~ W
>t- <!J
oa:(/)
<!J~a:~
:;:;:IWWt-
il:OLLO
wl(/)t-
Zzzm
wo~-=:J
<!JZt-(/)
10 1O~ ~
0000>
(\')1'-0
C\i1OOO
.v I'- T-
C')O)(\')
V-v 0>
10010
o
Z
(/) 0
Z(/)(/)
00>
t-Z-
<(-=:JO
a:LL....J
w~O
o..zO
O-I
OZO
Z<((/)
-=:Jt--l
LL(/)<
....J-=:Jt-
0(/)0
Olt-
ILLm
ou:l-=:J
(/)(/)(/)
C\I
~.
CD
~
i
-
en
o
ffi
rn
Z
W
Q.
~
~
o
I-
ffi
rn
Z
W
Q.
~
a:
W
~
W
:J
Z
W
[1j
a:
LL
o
W
o
Z
~
OJ
~
'*' '*' '*' '*'1 '*'
voovom
c\I,.....(y)ov
~-icx)ciLri
C\IC\I
'*' '*' '*' '*' '*' '*' '*' '*' '*' '*'1 '*'
<0 VC\lOOO,.....OOvvm(Y)
('I) vO('l).....CDvoo.....O,.....
cx)LriC\i~~<oo)cici~cx)
C\lC\I(Y)C\I('I).....C\I(Y) .....
~
Z
W
~
W
0.
-
.....
~
LO
m
10.
~
-
gggglg gggggggggglg
w
c ~
z
z <
::J :I:
U. ~ (.)
...J c::
~ ~
W W
Z 0
c:: C\I 6't
W m
~ ;i! m
.....
~ (.) c::
z z W
::J < m
0 z ~
(.) u: w
w ~ ~ C\I
...J W
c:: :I: en ~~8r .,-"'''''''....,'''...110
< ~ .....C\I .....LO ('I)oo.....O.....CDoo,..........OIO
~ Z CDoo.....mo 000 0)('1) CDCDooLO v,..... 0
W 0 ~tu CD-mmo r-: 6 m- .,f m- cO 00- cO (Y)- m (Y) ,.....-
m ~ .....o)CD(Y)..... LO,.....LOmC\lC\lLOLO.....OO.....
~ CD 0).......... m ooC\lCD,.....OOOLO.....LOLOm
s:8 ~g0~~ g .,.: ~ .,.: i C\I- N .,.: g ~ .,f
[tffi o 0 ~00 ~
W
::J
Z
W
[ij
c::
ZW
-::::>
~~
:::tIWGj
....JWc:~c::
<I-WZ-I
O;::@~~
genLLl-o
I-
Z
o
I- W
~ a: I- en
I-Z ::::>Z W
eno ~W ~
ZI- I-::::>~ W
~~ ~ ~&-1 c..
01- ~ O..J<( ~
<(en c.. I-~~ ~
!:-Z~(J)O <(WW Z
~~w~rrl WO~ I-
~~LL~Gjz5~b:~~
:::tI..Jc:s~OO~Z~W~
c:<(OOZ~_::::>WLLO
WO::;....J<(O~~O~-1
ZOCCCC~::>a:~Z<(<(
W::::>::::>::::>::::>O<(00a:I-
~....,c..c..J:Wa..:OZI-O
I-
ffi
en
z
w
0.
~
ffi
en
z
w
0.
~
c::
w
>
o
W
::J
Z
W
[ij
c::
u.
o
w
o
z
i
I-
Z
W
~
W
Q.
*****
C'lL08<OC\I
<000 LOC'l
~""':ci<cia)
...-C\1 ...-...-
*******
<OLOOC'l..,.......C\1
,...,OOC\I0mOv
~mr--:uja)a)<ci
...-C'lC\lC\lOOC\I...-
w
C!J
Z
<(
J:
()
c
Z
:J l-
LL. a::
...J 0
o Q.
o W
J: a:: C\I
m
~ ~ ~
~ () a::
Z ~ ~
:J Z :E
o ii: W
() t
W ~ W
...J J: en
a:: I-
<( Z
:E 0
~ :E
...J
<(
g ~ ggl{O
00 V LO
.,f <0- ~
...-...- 0
W ...- ...-
W W
- -
......
C'l ,..., V V 0 01 C\I
OCD<OOWWO
...-C'l......LO C\I
~LOLO~ m-
OOC\l...-C\1 ~
~WWW ifl.
-- -
~tu
~8
tffi
OOvOlVLO
,...,<O......CDOO
LOm...-<OM
m<6C\iC'lC\i
gomC'lV
ifl. ~ ~ 0 C'l_
o Mv
C\I MLO
W 00
...... V LO ...- 0 oo! LO
00,..., VC'l 0 V 00
C\I"'-...-OOVLOM
LO- C\i M- ~ C\i ...... C\i
...-OO""'OloomV
LO<Ooov0CDC'l
~~.,fLO 0.,f
~000 ~
00
LO
C'l.
m
00
o
...-
W
It)
C'l
<0.
......
<0
C'l
...
M
ffi
en
Z
W
a.
~
a::
W
>
o
W
:J
Z
W
~
a::
LL.
o
W
()
Z
i
W
:J
Z
W
~
a::
~
o ZW
o _:J
I (J)Z
o a:W
(J) ~W>
I LL.UJ
...JW (J)O:
<(I-WZ-J
o <( 0 <( 1-<(
Ol-WO:
...J(J)LL.I-O
I-
Z
I 0
~ WI-
W 0<(
Iffi~~
WO~8
~fi:~~ (J)
<(W-Z W
~~~O ~
WO-I- W
~I-~~ c..
<(<(-0: ~
1-1-1-
Z~~(J) ~
o wZ _
ZI-c..c..O I-
O~~OO(J)~
i=1-<((J)(J)O:W
o o:WWWc..
:J(J)I-I-I-LL.O
0: Z ...J ...J ...J Z(J) -J
I-~--- <(
~Og,~~~OI-
_<(c..u..:u..:l-
I-
ffi
en
Z
W
a.
~
..
Q
l2:
o
rz.E-l
P:
~~
1Zl~
l2:
~~~
Ha'I
:>40..-t
~~P:
o l2: IZl
OHIn
o rz. :I:
IZl
1Zl:>4E-l
~ ~ ~
IZl 0
In:l:
~
E-l Q
l2: IZl
IZlQ
o l2:
P: IZl
IZlPo
Po>:
IZl
t!I
H
~
Q In
E-l 0
:>4_
Po
>:
IZl
iC
Q
IZl E-l
E-l1Zl
o t!I
IZlQ
1-)0
~ In
Po
M
a'lE-l
-1Zl
Nt!I
a'lQ
o
:>4 In
rz.
dP dP dP dP dP dP dP
LnLno:ro:rOMa'I
NLnOO\D\DO
.
MCXlOa'll"-..-tLn
MN..-tNNMN
IZl
o
~
~
In
Lna'l..-tCXlLnNCXl
..-tMI.Ol"-l"-o:rCXl
LnI.ONLno:ro:ra'l
dP
1.0
M
CXl
N
dPdP
..-t..-t
Oa'l
CXl\D
N..-t
dPdPdPdPdP
OOOl"-o:r
o 1'1.0 1.0 N
.
OOo:ro:r\D
MNNN
dP
o:r
o:r
Ln
N
dPdPdPdPdPdPdPdP
o:ra'lO..-to:rNOItI
o:rON..-tl"-OOa'l
.
NOo:rNl"-LnLnCXl
MMNNNNNCXl
~ ... ... ... ... ... ...
a'I..-tCXll"-..-ta'lO
N I'M M..-t 1.0 0
NN..-t..-tMLn..-t
~~~~ ..~~
..-t
~
..-tMa'lNl"-LnCXl
LnLnMOMNN
MLno:rMOo:rCXl
o:rCXlLn\DOMM
..-to..-tLnO\DM
..-t..-t~~LnN~
~~ ~~
\DNOONl"-\D
\Da'lOCXl..-t\D..-t
CXl..-tl"-CXlItICXlCXl
" ... ... ... .... ... ...
MOMM..-tNo:r
o:rCXlLna'l..-tMM
MM..-t..-tCXlCXl..-t
~~~~ "~Vl-
..-t
~
\DNOONl"-\D
\Da'lOCXl..-t\D..-t
CXl..-tl"-CXlLnCXlCXl
... .... .... ... .... ... ...
MOMM..-tNo:r
o:rCXlLna'l..-tMM
MM..-t..-tCXlCXl..-t
~~Vl-~ ..~~
..-t
~
CXl
a'I
CXl
CXl
Ln
I'
l"ll"lOo:rNO\D
a'II.OI.ONa'II.ON
a'lCXlI.Oo:rl"-Nl"-
... ... ... ... .... ... ....
Oa'll"lONOLn
o:r~~l"lONo:r
~ ~l"lNM
~~~
CXl
..-t
I'
M
Ln
a'I
~
Oa'l..-tItlLn\DLnl"l
l"la'lo:rltll"-..-ta'll"-
CXl NI.ONa'I 1'1.01.0
... ... ... ... .... ... ... ...
O\DCXlCXlOOLnCXl
..-to..-tCXl\D..-t..-to:r
NNa'lLn~l"lo:r~
~~..~ ~~
..-t
~
N
~
Ln
l"l
a'I
..-t
a'I
o
..-t
~
1.01'0 CXl..-t\D Ln
o:rO~l"-a'll"lO
a'l0 o:rl"-..-tO
M
1.0
l"l
Ln
N
l"l
~
l"-Na'll"-I.Oa'lLnl"l
N..-t..-t\DOa'l\DLn
NCXlI.Oa'lo:rI.OLna'l
.... ... ... ... ... .... ... ...
..-tCXlN\Dl"ll"lCXl..-t
OCXl..-t\DNOl"la'l
..-t~\D..-t~..-t..-tl"l
~ ~~ ~~~
LnN
..-t Vl-
~
l"lCXlNl"l
..-ta'll"-N
~ Vl- ~ ..-t
~
..-t
CXl
o
a'I
I'
N
..-t
~
1"-..-t0N..-tLn01.0
Ln..-t\DNCXl..-t\DN
O..-tNNl"lo:rN\D
... ... ... .... .... ....
NLn..-tLno:ro:ro:rO
..-ta'll"lLnCXl..-tLno:r
l"lNLnl"-~o:rLno:r
~~..~ ~~~
N
Vl-
l"l
l"l
CXl
o
Ln
CXl
l"l
~
a'lOONl"l\D..-t
l"ll"-\DOCXla'll"l
a'lCXlI.Oa'lLnl"ll"-
... ... .... ... ... ... ...
\D..-tl"ll"l..-tNCXl
Ln..-t~o:rOa'l\D
Vl-~ ~o:rNo:r
~Vl-~
..-t
CXl
o
a'I
I'
N
..-t
~
l"-..-tON..-tLnO\D
Ln..-t\DNCXl..-t\DN
O..-tNNl"lo:rN\D
... ... --. .... ...
NLn..-tLno:ro:ro:rO
..-ta'll"lLnCXl..-tLno:r
l"lNLnl"-~o:rLno:r
~~..~ ~~~
N
~
l"l
l"l
CXl
o
Ln
CXl
l"l
~
a'lOONl"l\D..-t
l"ll"-\DOCXla'll"l
a'lCXlI.Oa'lLnl"ll"-
... .... .... ... .... ... ...
\D..-tl"ll"l..-tNCXl
Ln..-t~o:rOa'l\D
Vl-Vl- Vl-o:rNo:r
Vl-~~
z
0 l-l
H s:: Q)
P: E-l 0 > > +J
~ ..-1 ..-1 ..-1 > s::
IZl m Q Q ..-1 Q)
E-l E-l +J +J ~ ..-1 Q 0
l2: tIl l-l l-l :>. > Q) Q) ..-t
IZl m m H ::l ::l Q) H ..-1 U U Q) 0 m .
0 l-l Q) Q) l2: 0 0 s:: 0 Q ..-1 ..-1 > l-l s:: +J
0 U U m H 0 0 l-l H > > ..-1 +J 0 0.
E-l m s:: ..-1 s:: X 0 Q +J l-l l-l +J s:: ..-1 Q)
tI) ..-1 Q) III > 0 ~ +J +J +J 0 s:: Q) Q) III 0 +J Q
0 > > s:: \.I ..-1 U -.-I +J I-) Q) tIltll 010 III +J
0 l-l -.-I III -.-I Q) +J -.-I +J ::l < 8 -.-I l-l s:: Q)
Q) +J Q) rz. tIl U ~ +J l-l l-l U ~ Q) . ..-t +J ..-t Q) Q) l-l
0. ::l U Q) \.I +J ::l l-l ..c:: 01S:: 0 m III 0.8 ..-1
::l U -.-I Ij..j s:: ...... E-l ::l UI 0 ..-1 +J E-l III -.-I l-l Ol 8 o +J rz.
tIl Q) > 0 0 IZl 0 o ..-1 Q) 0 0 ...... 0 ~.a +J > ..-1 l-l
>< ...... l-l -.-I E-l o Q +J III E-l III s:: s:: :>'Ill l-l
Ij..j IZl Ol Q) \.I +J Ij..j l:Q III Ol Ij..j Ol In :I: < Po H < U o.Ol
0 s:: tIl 0 III 0 0 +J ...... l-l ...... 0 ~ Ij..j 0 t:: Q) Ol
:>. s:: +J 8 tIl ..-1 III +J -.-I t:: Ij..j tIl Ol Q) Ol Ol Ol OlQ+J
'0 +J 0 ...... U l-l '0 ::l l-l UI s:: .!o: 0 ..-1 U U U U U 01 s::
l-l s:: UI III Ol 0 l-l U Ol ..-1 Ol l-l ~ \.I -.-I -.-I ..-1 -.-I -.-I l-l Ol ::l
III ::l l-l 01l-l Ij..j III l-l s:: 01 > Ol Q) ............ ...... ...... ...... Q) l-l ......
0 0 Ol Ol -.-I s:: 0 ..-1 Q) III ::l ...... 0 ..c:: 0 0 0 0 0 8 ..-1 0
In 0 Po ~Q H In 0 t!I:l:1-) 0 0 tIl Po Po Po Po Po 1Zlrz.>
..
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
'<l' l"l 0 0 ID ID N t"- ID 0 '<l' 0 0 0 rl N 0 Ul N rl 0'1 0:) t"- O 0 0:) 0'1 rl Ul
rl ID 0 0 N 0:) 0 Ul III 0 l"l l"l 0 0 l"l ID 0:) ID '<l' '<l' III rl ID 0 0 0 0:) 0 rl
. . . . . . .
rl Ul 0 0 0'1 N N ID l"l 0 N t"- III 0 rl 0'1 ID 0:) t"- N t"- rl ID 0 0 0'1 t"- O rl
0:) N III N '<l' l"l N rl l"l N N III l"l N N N N l"l '<l' l"l rl 0 N N t"- rl
rl
O'<l'UlOIDt"-
OrlO'lOIDO:)
o t"-Ull"l 0 III
.... " .... .... .. ...
Ulrll"lO:)'<l'rl
Nl"lrlIDUlt"-
0000'<l'rl
00
OOOrl'<l'O
t"-l"l00rlrl
UlO'l l"l0:)t"-
..
t"-O
Orl
rl 0
o
o:)t"-o:)
IDo:)N
0rlrl
00
O'<l'UlrlOt"-
t"-'<l'0'I00:)0'I
UlIDUlIDo:)N
NNl"lIDrlO
l"l'<l'rll"l'<l' 0
rl00rlIDl"l
o 000
O'<l'UlrlOt"-
t"-'<l'0'I 0 0:) 0'1
UlIDUlIDo:)N
NNl"lIDrlO
l"l'<l'rll"l'<l'O
rl00rlIDl"l
o 000
$.t
o
+I
Cll
s::
....
'0
$.t
o
o
U
$.t
Ql
Ql
+I
s::
Ql ::I
::I......
U 0 >.
01 > +I
Ql ....
P:: Ql Ql $.t
-::l $.t::l
Ql U .... U
u01rz.Ql
s:: Ql {/)
CllP::+I
......-01+1
::l Ql Ql s::
~~~~
>.
+I
Ql
11-I
Cll
{/)
U
....
......
.0
01 ::l
s:: P.
o
....
+1.0
U ....
Ql $.t
0.+1
01 s::
s:: 0
1-1 U
ID
'<l'
l"l
'<l'
N
Ul
l"lUlOt"-
IIlrlOo:)
ID'<l'OO'l
... ... ... ...
Ull"lIDN
Ul'<l'00
'<l'N ID
00 0
0:)
0:)
N
o
III
III
o
..
0:)
o
l"l
rl
o
OOl"l'<l'IDOO:)'<l'O
IDO'It"-IDOl"lONN
rlUlNUlIDOO'lO:)Ul
... .. .. .... ... .... ...
l"lOIDNrll"lO:)OUl
O:)OON'<l''<l'rlrl'<l'
l"lrlNID00rl0N
0000 0 0
rl
o
Ul
t"-
'<l'
N
t"-
t"-
N
o
o
N
N
t"-
Ul
l"l
t"-
N
o
o 0..... N '<l'N
0l"l'<l'rl'<l''<l'
O'IOt"-N'<l'
.... ..
NO'I'<l'O:)O:)
OOl"lUlID
.....rlN00
000
..
'<l'
o
l"l
t"-
Ul
o
l"l
rl
N
o
Nl"lOUl
Ul0:)0rl
O:)rl N
'<l'0:)
IDl"l
rl 0
o
o
Ul
N
rl
0'1
'<l'
o
OOO'lO'lUlrlrlOO:)
NO'Il"lUlrlo:)l"lO'lt"-
t"-UlOO'<l'N 0'1 rlO'l
t"-O'<l'Nrlt"-'<l'UlN
NO O'IIDo:) rl'<l'0N
rlrl0Nl"l00 N
00 00 0
l"l
o
N
ID
Ul
N
rl
o
'<l'
'<l'
'<l'
rl
t"-
'<l'
Ul
o
OOUll"lNo:)
rl0rlO'l III 0:)
l"l t"-t"-O'IUl
t"-
o
... ... ... ...
'<l'OUlO:)
'<l'0'Il"l0
00 rl
o
0'1
rl
0'1
'<l'
Ul
ID
ID
o
Ulo:)ON
00'100
IIlUlON
..
O.....IDrl
N0:)00'1
IDN 0:)
00 0
III
o
l"l
0'1
0'1
t"-
rl
o
OONl"lrlrlO'l'<l'O:)
o:)O:)rlNNrll"lrlO'l
O:)rll"lIDOl"lO:)O'<l'
... lito............"...
OrlO'<l'l"lOl"lIDO:)
rlOOo:)NIDIDrlID
UlNl"l0:)'<l'0rl0'<l'
0000 0 0
rl
o
0:)
t"-
ID
0:)
N
o
'<l'
o
'<l'
ID
ID
0:)
N
0:)
N
l"l
o
OOIDUlIDO
rll"lUlOO'll"l
l"lO'lt"-UlrlO
t"-Nl"lUl'<l't"-
00UlNO'It"-
rlrll"lrl0
0000
0'1
.....
0'1
'<l'
Ul
ID
Ulo:)ON
00'100
UlUlON
.. ..
OrlIDrl
N 0:) 00'1
IDN 0:)
00 0
III
o
l"l
0'1
0'1
t"-
rl
o
OONl"lrlrlO'l<:l'O:)
o:)O:)rlNNrll"lrlO'l
O:)rll"lIDOl"lO:)O'<l'
OrlO'<l'l"lOl"lIDO:)
rlOOo:)NIDIDrlID
UlNl"l0:)'<!'0rl0'<!'
0000 0 0
rl
o
0:)
t"-
ID
0:)
N
o
'<!'
o
'<!'
ID
ID
0:)
N
0:)
N
l"l
o
OOIDUlIDO
rll"lUlOO'll"l
l"lO'lt"-UlrlO
..
t"-Nl"lUl'<!'t"-
00UlNO'It"-
.....rll"l..-l0
0000
..
ID
o
:>i
E-l
r:<l
rz.
0<
{/)
U
1-1
H
a:I
D
p.
......
Cll 01
01 Ql
o u
01 0. ....
s:: 01 +I >
.... .... s:: $.t
$.t 0 Cll Ql
Ql $.t {/)
Ql Ql t!l
s:: 01 11-I
.... ::I l"l 11-I
01 11-I U Cll
S::QlO<+I
r:<lP::U{/)
{/)
~
~
U
1-1
H
a:I
D
p.
+I
s::
Ql In
e +I
Ql ....
0111-I
III Ql
s:: s::
Cll Ql
~a:I
Ql
U
....
>
$.t
$.t Q)
8'{/)~
l-l +I D
p. s:: I
Ql '0
~ ~.~
.... 0 u
> ...... ....
$.t 0. '0
Ql e Ql
{/) r:<l ~
+I
s::
Ql Ql
g 6.
Cll 0
+I......
01 Ql
.... >
01 Ql
::! 0
s::
>'Cll
Ole
$.t ::l
Ql :I:
s::
r:<l
E-l
Z
~
P.
o
H
~
r:<l
o
01
Ql
In
01
Cll
s:: ......
o U
.... e
+I Ql ill I<S
Cll U $.t
$.t s:: 01 01
+I Cll 0 U
01 s:: $.t ....
.... Ql P. +I
S::+I ......
.... s:: e Ql
e.... .... ..s::
~~~~
I I I I
s:: s:: s:: s::
o 0 0 0
.... .... -... ....
+1+1+1+1
Cll Cll Cll Cll
Ql Ql Ql Ql
. .II: $.t $.t $.t $.t
Cll $.t U U U U
> Cll Ql Ql Ql Ql
p.p::p::p::p::
+I
s:: Cll
o s::
.a~JJJJJJJJ
Ql > $.t $.t $.t $.t
.... .... Cll Cll Cll Cll
p.P::p.p.p.p.
~
E-l
o
E-l
a:I
D
{/)
01
~ 01
$.t ~
01
o
$.t
P.
+I
s::
Ql
e '0
+I $.t
$.t Cll
III 0
o.a:I
Q)
0><:
..s:: s::
+100<0<0<
M."" . .
Cll 01 P. ll< ll<
QJ OJ . . .
:l:P::>>>
~
E-l
o
E-l
a:I
D
{/)
.0
....
0< \..I
+I
ll< s::
. 0
> U
Ql
01
Ql
......
......
o
U
z
o
1-1
E-l
tj
D
o
r:<l
~
:I:
.
~
o
U
0<0<
. .
ll<ll<
. .
>>
~
E-l
o
E-l
a:I
D
{/)
~
E-l
o
E-l
a:I
D
{/)
I<SI<SI<SI<S
.
dPdPdPdP
COOOI"'-
C7'1ll01O
.
o III III 0
r-fI"'-C'Ilqt
dP
co
qt
C7'
C'Il
dP dP dP dP dP dP dP
r-fr-fr-f100101"'-
qtlOr-fl")qtOIO
.
III CO 1"'-0C7'0 I"'-
C'IlC'llC'llI")r-fr-fqt
dP
qt
co
.
o
I")
dPdPdP
01"'-0
0r-f0
. .
01"'-0
qt
dP
qt
I"'-
o
dP
C7'
o
r-f
dP
I")
I"'-
CO
r-f
IOqtOCO I"'- I")I")C'IlI"'-C7'qtlO qt Olll~ C7' 0 C'Il
IOC7'COIll 10 I")IllCOI"'-IllIOC'Il C7' OCOr-f C7' 0 I"'-
1llC7'1llC7' ~ 1"'-C7'~IllIllCOIO I"'- Olllqt C7' I"'- 10
.... ... ... ... .. ... ... -. ... ... ,
CO~OIO qt 1")1")1Or-fqt1")CO C'Il 1OC7'1"'- C'Il r-f 10
1")r-fr-f1O 0 C'Ilr-fI")r-fI")IOC'Il r-f C'IlC'llC7' III r-f III
00r-f0 CO Illr-fC'll000C'1l C'Il ~ 00 III III I"'-
.. 000 0 ..
r-f r-f r-f I") I") 10 C'Il
0 0 0 0 0 0 III
0
COlOqtO 10 r-f1llC7'I"'-IOIllC'll III 01110 III 0 qt
1llr-fC7'C7' r-f C7'lOlOqtr-f~1ll CO 0r-f0 r-f 0 CO
I"'-C'Ilr-fCO qt 1")10 C7'01")r-fC'Il I"'- ~ ~ 0 I")
..
~1001ll ~ CO IllI"'-IllCOI"'-CO 0 10 10 C'Il 0
0~1"'-~ III I"'- ~C00000 ~ C'Il C'Il I"'- 10
01")0 I"'- r-f 00 C'Il III 0 0 0 r-f
0 0 0 0 (I)-
C'Il
r-f
0
~O~CO I") ~COr-f~IllC7'CO C7' OO~ ~ 0 10
C'Ilr-fI"'-~ CO C'Ilr-fIllC'll 1"'-0 I"'- I"'- OOrl rl 0 III
I")C'IlI"'-CO CO r-f1O~IOCOOCO III OO~ ~ I"'- 0
.. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ..
I")r-fOC'll CO C'IlC7'~IOC'Ilr-f1O I") 10101"'- C7' I") I"'-
~IOCOr-f III o IllC'llr-fqt 1"'-1") III C'IlIllC7' I"'- CO rl
00~r-f III I"'-rl1")000~ I"'- ~ (I)- 0 III III C7'
..0 (I)- 0 0 0
rl C'Il rl I") I") 10 qt
0 0 0 (I)- 0 0 10
(I)-
~O~CO I") ~COrl~IllC7'CO C7' OO~ ~ 0 10
C'Ilr-fI"'-~ CO C'Il r-fIllC'll 1"'-0 I"'- I"'- 00r-f r-f 0 III
I")C'IlI"'-CO CO r-flOqtIOCOOCO III OO~ ~ I"'- 0
..
I")r-fOC'll CO C'IlC7'~IOC'IlrllO I") 10101"'- C7' I") I"'-
~IOCOr-f III OIllC'llr-f~1"'-1") III C'IlIllC7' I"'- CO r-f
00~r-f III 1"'-r-fI")(I}-00~ I"'- ~00 III III C7'
..0 000 0
r-f C'Il rl I") I") 10 ~
0 0 (I)- (I)- 0 (I)- 10
0
III
~ E1
QI Z
4-l III ~
t: 4-l ~
QI t: p.
0 QI ::> 4-l 0 III
> E1 t: H 4-l 4-l ~
>01'<1 H QI ~ t: t:
4-l QI ::> 6- QI QI E1
..-1 M ~ 0 1'<1 e e z
t: Id ::1 '- t: 0 Cl QI 4-l ~
::1 ..-1 4-l Z 0 M Q) III
~ U M 0 Ol ..-1 QI :>i ~ ::1 E1 U)
Q) ::1 H t: 4-l III > E1 Ol .n ~ P:
0 r:ll 0 E1 ..-1 III ~ Q) H ~ '0 1'<1
o U) '- ~ III > 4-l Cl Z ~ p. ~
I I t: ~ ::1 ~ t: ~ ::> Q) 1'<1 U)
t: t: 0 0 Q) Q) Ol>O ~ ::1 4-l Cl ~
0 0 ..-1 0 :I: III e o 4-l t: Q) Z
..-1 ..-1 4-l ~ t: QI ~ ..-1 Q) Ol 0
4-l 4-l III ~ 0 0lP. t: 0 > '0 Z E1 ~
III III QI 0 Id ~ Q) ::1
QI QI ~ ~ 4-l t: t: ~ P: !:Q ~ ~ E1
~ ~ U t: ~ III 0 I 0
U U QI E1 Q) Q) ::t: ..-1 0 E1 >0 >0 E1 E1 E1
QI Q) P: 0 e 4-l III 0 0 4-l U 0 0
P: P: III E1 r:ll III '0 t: E1 t: t: E1 E1
QI . !:Q OlO ~ Q) QI !:Q ::1 Q) !:Q !:Q
~ ~ ..-1 .0 ::> t: M ..c:4-l .0 ::> 0 III Ol ::> ::>
~ ..-1 U) ..-1 Q) Ol~ III >< ..... U) 0'0 t: U) U)
III III III ~ t: > t: ~ 1'<1 ~ '-t: ..-1
.!O: .!O: ~ 4-l t: Q) ..-1 M QI 4-l >0::1 4-l
~ ~ .0 t: III '0 t: ..-1 4-l H t: 4-lli-l t:
III III -.-I 0 M QI 0 0 III P. 0 -.-I Q) 0
p. P. H 0 P. P: N U) ~ > 0 UP: 0
I-
Z
W
o
a:
W
a..
W
a:!;(
LEo
>-0
I-
W
~
0 z
<(
Z J:
:J 0
LL
~
Z
Zl-
-a:
~fr -lC
0
(/)W ~W
:Ja:C\I -I-
(/)....JO> ~@
1<(0)
LL_T""" ita
....J0a:
WZw a:
(/)<(m a..
~z::!:
ZLLW
:J~li:
OJ:W
Ol-(/) ~lii
wz
cfO C\I~
0>0
<(::!: itffi
::!:
W
m
....J
<(
*******~~~**~~*~*****
~00080~zzzoozzoz~~~0~
C\l000 00> 00 0 ~~vo~
~ooooo~ 00 0 ~~~om
C\I C')
maaaaa~~~~aaaaa8~~~a~
0> VC\lV~ ~~O>~ ~
!- ~o~~ ~~-~N ~
~C\I~C') T""" O>T""" ""
~ ~ ~ ~~ C\I
~
000000000000000000000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OT"""~~~OOOOO~OOOOO~T"""OO~
~~OO>~OC\l~~~O>N~~m~~C\lOOO
C\I~~OC\lO~ O>~ v O~O>O""
NO~~NOON O~ N oooomo~
~~~~~~C\I iT""" "" ~~C\lT"""""
VC\l~~~~~ ~ ~ ~C\lC\I~O>
-~~ ~ ~~~-
~ ~
OT"""~~~OOOOOC')OOOOO~T"""OO~
~OOOO>~OC\l~~~mC\l~~m~~C\looo
C\I~~OC\lO~ mC') v O~O>O""
NO~~NOON o~ N oooomo~
~""~~~""C\I iT""" "" ~~C\lT"""""
VC\l~~~~~ ~ ~ ~C\lC\I~m
-~~ ~ ~~~-
~ ~
W
:J
Z
W
[ij
a:
W Z
....J 0
~ l-
(/) <3
Z :JW
~ @~Z
a: ....JWO
m J: <(0-
ffi 0 I 0 ocn!;(
o Z~ 8 ~ ~~g....J
ffi~ OZ~~O::!: a: cn~08 ~W
oW !;(0a::JJ:<(~a..0 ....J:JWJ: :J:J
-(/) o-,"a:o~~a.. 0>-0 a:z
~o-= :JI-OO~~~<(~O<(~(/)~I-w
woa:a:I-O~a:I-J:o~(/):JJ:~za:ow[ij
(/)O~~~wza..~O~OffiLL~S:JWOa:a:
8~~~~g<3~0~a..~omL1 .~~~!z~
oJ:J:J:~a:a:....J~<(mo~wa:~O:Jwol-
LL<(OO~OOcn(/)wowa..~a..~ocnl-::!:O
I-
Cl
Z
:J
u.
(!J
Z
Zb:
~~
enW
:J
ena:C\I
l.....Jm
u.<(m
.....JO~
WZa:
en<(w
>-ZCO
....-~
zU.w
:J~I-
o I 0..
Ol-W
Wzen
lfO
<(~
~
W
co
.....J
<(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I- ~~~m~~8zzz~~zzgz~~~8zg
Wz oo~omNNo o~ ~ O~MO ~
~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~
~
W
0..
W
a:!;(
~Cl
>-0
I-
W
(!J
Z
<(
I
o
'"
Cl
~W
-I-
~@
(ta
a:
0..
~tu
C\I(!J
mCl
(tffi
~~~M~~OOOOO~M~~O~MooOoo~
Moooo~mC\leeeeoo~~~e~~~e~~
oC\l~m~~ mOC\leC\l mC\lm eM
oo~oo~ooo ~-~-~ M N~~ ~
C\I~~ee~ e e mo~ ~
~ee e eC\l~ ~
e ee e
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
O~~~~OOOOOMOOOOOM~OOO~ 0
MooOm~OC\leeemC\leemeOOC\looeo e
C\I~~OC\lO~ mM ~ OMmo ~
NO~~NOON O~ N oooomo ~
~~M~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~C\I~ ~
~C\I~eee~ ~ e ooC\lC\le m
-ee e eee-
~ ~
O~~~~OOOOOMOOOOOM~OOO~ 0
MooOm~OC\leeemNeemeOONooeo e
C\I~~OC\lO~ mM ~ OMmo ~
NO~~NOON O~ N oooomo ~
~C\I~~M~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~C\I~ ~
~ ~~~~ ~ ~ cx)C\lC\I~ m
-e e eee-
~ ~
ffi
en
Z
W
0..
Ii)
Z
o
I-
> <( ~
~ 0 Zen
~ ~w ~~
o WOz.....Jz
~ ~~O ~~
ffi cl 6 G @~!;( Ii) Ii)
o ~~ 0 ~ o..~ga 1-a:(!J
ffi~ I-Z~O(!J~ a: en~Clo en~Z
om ~Offi5~~~& 6:JwG ~z!;(
~cl-= :J~o.....JCl(!J~<(zO~~en~l-oa:
WOa:a:I-ClNa:II-O(!Jen:JI<(za:oWI-<(~
enoWwzwzo..oza:oenu.Oa::Jwoa:
ClU.~~~(!J~(!J~~~~~~~Ii)~~CO~~~
8~~~~~a:~~~COCl~W~wo~8oB~
U.<(OO~ClOenWenowo..(!Jo..(!Joenl-~u.O
I-
0;-
M
00
m-
Ol
~
-
o
e
ffi
en
z
W
0..
Ii)
a:
W
>
o
W
:J
Z
W
Gj
a:
u.
o
W
o
z
~
co
W
.....J
.....J
Distributed to Board: JD~~-
n'7 I ( 011 ,lP52-
Agenda Item No. ....::lY--'.--- ..
Edward H. Ba n, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
CharlottesvilJ
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Board of Supervisors
/7. J
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC,iJ;vv
October 30, 1992
Reading List for November 4, 1992
A gust 5, 1992 -
- Pages 1 - 12 (#7b) - Mr. Bain
Pages 12 (#7b) - 23 - Mr. Bowerman ft S.
~raqcG 24 35 (#22) - Ml;::;. Htl111ph.L.i.~ I.O..~.'.
-Pages 3::i (#22) t::ml Mr. I'erkins \ .ct..
Ea0e~ 1 - 11 (#11) - Mr J.V.larch.J.ll. Q.x.~~
.PageD 11 (#11) 22 (#12) - ML. PeLkln~ 14
Pages 22 (#12) - end - Mr. Martin
LE :ec
Edward H. Sal . Jr
Samuei Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginio 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
~orrest R, Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bowe man
Charlottesville
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
November 5, 1992
Dan S. Roosevelt
ident Engineer
artment of Transportation
Box 2013
r1ottesville, VA 22902
r Mr. Roosevelt:
At its' meeting on November 4, 1992, the Board of Supervisors took the
fo lowing actions:
Agenda Item No. 5.3. Resolution to request that Commonwealth Drive Connec-
to Road be taken into the State System of Secondary Highways, and guaranteeing
th road against defective materials and/or workmanship for one year up to a
ma imum of $3750.00. ADOPTED
Agenda Item No. 5.3a. Resolution to request that Bentivar Drive in Benti-
va Subdivision be taken into the State System of Secondary Highways. ADOPTED
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matter. Discussion: Millington Bridge (Route
67 ), draft letter to Ray Pethtel (deferred from October 14, 1992).
APPROVED as amended. Letter forwarded to Mr. Pethtel.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Other Highway Matters.
Mr. Perkins thanked Mr. Roosevelt for having asphalt laid under the bridge
on Route 240 in Crozet.
The Board requested the Highway Department to look at the traffic movement
at the Route 20/53 intersection to see what improvements can be done to allevi-
at traffic congestion and make a report to the Board on December 2.
Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt
November 5, 1992
Page 2
Mr. Perkins has just learned that the Highway Department is no longer
helping to obtain right-of-way along gravel roads for improvement projects. He
asked that staff confirm this with Mr. Roosevelt, and to consider assigning a
county staff member to this task.
~O?tW~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
LEN:ec
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
, .
<.
H.}-C,~ 2~..-
[0 . 3 0 c;!'~:
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA
Millington Bridge
AGENDA DATE:
October 14, ~992
ITEM NUMBER:
?J$l . 1<::\~.(aL~
ACTION: ~
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes ( 1 )
STAFF C
Messrs.
/J. r;--
REVIEWED BY: /t::9t{),
BACKGRO
At your October 7, 1992 Board meeting you requested staff prepare a draft letter directed to
Mr. Pet tel that outlines specific issues relevant to the County's consideration of an
alterna ive to replace the Millington Bridge, in its current location, with local funds.
letter is provided for you consideration.
jbt
92.150
DRAFT
October 14, 1992
Ray D. Pethtel
issioner
rtment of Transportation
onwealth of Virginia
East Broad street
mond, VA 23219
Mr. Pethtel:
marle County wants to pursue the possibility of replacing the
ington Bridge on Route 671 in it's current location. This has
been the County's preference. In view of the current impasse in
ining the necessary right-of-way easements from the Virginia
oors Foundation and the continued deterioration of the current
ge it is necessary to look at other alternatives.
I
I
I
I
KnOring the state will not support the expenditure of state funds
unl ss the bridge and it's accesses can be brought up to state
dards the County is considering the possible expenditure of local
s to replace the bridge in it's current location. This action is
confidered prudent in light of not only the current impasse but also
I
in ~erms of possible significant costs differentials. The Virginia
I
I
DePrrtment of Transportation's current estimate to complete the Green
Linr alignment is $1,468,000. Your Resident Engineer, Mr. Dan
Roorevelt, provided a ballpark estimate to replace the bridge in its
I
current location of $135,000. Although this may be low, the
I
pos~ibility of significant cost savings demands this alternative be
I
I
invrstigated.
I
I
. ,
I
Thel Board of Supervisors requests your support in determining the
I
I
fea~ibility of this proposal and in the spirit of mutual cooperation
I
I
see~s your assistance. The Virginia Department of Transportation's
I
I
pos~tion and advice will be critical to the Board's discussion of
I
I
thi~ proposal. Though not all encompassing the Board has identified
I
thel following initial issues:
I
I
I
: 0 Would the bridge have to be taken out of the secondary road
I
I
I
sys~em for such construction, or reconstruction, to take place? If
so, can this be done?
o If the bridge were replaced in its current location, and
des~gned to state and federal safety standards, what additional
I
I
reqpirements would have to be met for the bridge to be accepted into
I
I
thel secondary road system?
o What procedures and policy decisions would have to occur for
suc~ a proposal to be reach fruition if it was determined to be
I
I
fea~ible?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: 0 What steps, and associated timeline, would be required for
I
I
anyl state reviews and/or approvals? This is critical in determining
I
I
whep local funds would need to be allocated.
I
o What impact would this have on our six-year secondary road
plap recently approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board?
"
I 0 What is VDOT's forecast of the useful life of the current
Mil~ington Bridge?
I
I
I
I
I
I
: 0 If VDOT would not accept a replacement bridge into the state
I
I
sys~em, would the state perform inspection and maintenance from
I
I
seCrndary road funds? If not, what inspection and maintenance would
I
be required by the state?
I
I
I
I
I
Whi~e these may not be all the critical questions it is a starting
I
I
poipt in determining if it is a feasible alternative. I would ask
I
I
tha~ you address any other critical issues that are germane to this
I
I
proposal.
I
I
I
I
I
In rummary, replacing the current bridge is not at issue. Replacing
thel bridge at a reasonable cost that meets the needs of the citizens
I
of ~lbemarle county is our objective. This proposal offers another
I
alt~rnative. I look forward to your response and if a meeting of
I
I
cOUrty and VDOT staff is necessary to further explore this
alttrnative, we will be happy to participate.
I
I
I
I
I
Sinperely,
I
I
I
I
I
I
Dav~d P. Bowerman
cha~rman
cc: Mr. Thomas F. Farley, Culpeper District
Mr. Daniel S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer
.. . ..
County of Albemarle
AGENDA
Milling
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA DATE:
October 7, 1992
/()..J-7'c2~
ITEM NUMBER:
f' .r /0'/ 7 ,:;- ~/ y
ACTION:
INFORMATION:~
SUBJECT
Discuss
Bridge
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes (2)
STAFF C
Messrs.
REVIEWED BY:
Brandenburger, Cilimberg
BACKGRO ND:
The Mil ington Bridge over the Moorman's River is deteriorating and in need of replacement.
This ha been discussed many times and the County's position has been to replace the bridge
in it's existing location. VDoT has not supported this as the approach roads to the current
locatio do not meet design standards. The culmination of County and VDoT discussion has
resulte in an alternative solution referred to as the "Green Line" alignment which calls for
a new b idge located upstream from the current bridge with improved access roads. These
positio s are outlined in the attached Board resolution. Besides the change in road
alignme t, the new bridge would have two additional upgrades: (1) two lanes versus the
current one lane, and (2) increase in maximum load limit.
The cur ent situation is as follows:
· G een Line alignment cannot proceed as VDoT cannot obtain the necessary right-of-way
e sements which are held by the Virginia Outdoors Foundation (VOF). VDoT has requested
V F release the easements but their request was denied. VDoT then requested the County
i tercede with VOF. The County has not done so. VDoT has the option to appeal to the
G vernor.
· G een Line alignment has completed design, public hearings and has Commonwealth
T ansportation Board (CTB) approval. Total cost estimates in 1991 were $1,468,000
( 546,000 for the road improvements and $922,000 for the new bridge).
· T e load limit was recently reduced from 7 tons to 3 tons due to continued
d terioration. VDoT inspections will continue every 6 months with subsequent minimal
r pairs but ultimate closure is probable. VDoT has given no estimate of how long the
b idge can continue to be used.
DISCUSS ON:
The fol owing options are presented for your consideration:
· M intain the current bridge as long as possible with ultimate closure likely.
Milling on Bridge
v~ _..
..
Milling
October
Page 2
on Bridge
7, 1992
· B ild the Green Line alignment if VOF will release their Open-Space easements by one
o two actions:
- Governor intercede with VOF, or
County intercede with VOF (This is VDoT's preferred solution.)
.
oT replace the bridge in its current location.
kes no improvements in the road alignments.)
(VDoT does not support this as it
· C unty fund replacement of the bridge in its current location. Implications:
Estimate a minimum of $135,000 total cost from County funds. Costs
likely to be larger once P & E completed.
Takes the bridge out of service for 1-2 years.
VDoT permit required. May require CTB approval through permitting
process with ultimate delays in starting construction.
COUIlty would retain maintenance responsibility and liability if the
bridge were not a part of the state secondary road system. Legal
ramifications are outlined in the attached memorandum from the
County Attorney.
RECOMME DATION:
None, i formation provided for discussion.
92.143
..... ~'M
RESOLUTION
ALB EMARLE COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
REAS, the Board of Supervisors supports the repair of the bridge
Moorman's River on State Route 671 at Millington, and
WH REAS, the Board of Supervisors has not supported changing the
alignme ts at the approaches to this bridge as proposed by the Virginia Depart-
ment of Transportation because of the following:
1. its concern over the negative aesthetic impact on the Moorman's River
and its environs, the Moorman's being both a state and county scenic
river with land at Millington through which the so-called improvements
will pass having recently been covered by open space easements
donated to the Virginia Outdoors Foundation;
2. its concern over the negative impact upon land in actual agricultural
use in the Moorman's River Agricultural/Forestal District and the
negative impact upon adjoining properties;
3. its conce.rn that such realignment and widening of the approaches as
proposed by the Virginia Department of Transportation will encourage
vehicular traffic to travel faster than is safe for State Route 671,
given the sharp curves and narrow pavement at either end of the
proposed improvement; and
4. its concern that the proposed improvements are inconsistent with the
character of State Route 671 and the surrounding environs; and
REAS, the Board of Supervisors did evidence its concerns over these
impacts, and its belief that more critical secondary road safety impr.ovements
existed in the County other than the realignment of the approaches to said
bridge, by unanimously voting to remove said bridge project from the Six Year
Seconda Road Improvement Budget in April 6, 1988, allocating such funds to
other s condary road safety improvements, and
WH REAS, the Board of Supervisors was later notified that its entire Six
Year B dget had been rejected by the Virginia Department of Transportation as
a result of the Board's deletion of this project, and
REAS, the Board of Supervisors appealed this action to the Commission-
Virginia Department of Transportation, and
er
WH REAS, the Board of Supervisors, after the hearing of its appeal by
the Co missioner, reasonably believed its appeal would be denied and the
improve ents constructed as originally proposed by the Virginia Department of
Transpo tation, and
, ~ .. ....
- 2 -
HEREAS, believing that such improvements were inevitable and would be
exces ively damaging, the Board of Supervisors agreed to support an alterna-
tive a ignment to that originally proposed by the Virginia Department of Trans-
portat on, called the "Green Line" alignment, believing such alternative to be
less maging than the project originally proposed by the Virginia Department
of Tr nsportation, although the Board of Supervisors still prefers that no
chang in the alignment of the bridge be constructed and that the bridge be
re lac d in place, for all of the reasons hereinabove stated,
OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Albern rle County, Virginia, that it continues to prefer that no change in the
align ent and design of the approaches to said bridge be undertaken and that
said ridge be replaced in place for all of the reasons stated previously.
Howe er, if the Virginia Department of Transportation continues to reject this
altern tive, then the Board of Supervisors believes the "Green Line" alignment
with 30 mile per hour design, 18 feet of pavement and shoulders and ditching
to co form as nearly as possible to the existing State Route 671, with aggregate
treat ent of the bridge and parapet surfaces and an anodized bronze aluminum
rail t be the least damaging alternative.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing con-
stitut s a true, correct copy of a resolution originally adopted by the Board
of Co nty Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a meeting held on
Octob r 11, 1989, and readopted on April 10, 1991, changing the word "repaired"
in the iast two paragraphs to "rePla~.~
Clerk, Board of ounty
- , '"' ,. . ~ ., "., r.
COUNTY 0:- l\._bcJi:l-.\i..'.2.
t~.l~. if. f.... ~ J.. . t,..
(. , v.
..
;;!
SEP 24H:.il
;'. "
f";; y... ~
i:. \~
()fFl ~
GEORGE R. ST. OHN
COUNTY ATTORN Y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney
416 Park Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Telephone 296.7138
September 22, 1992
JAMES M. BOWLING, IV
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
Robe t W. Tucker, Jr.
Albe arle County Executive
V. W
Dire
401
Char
yne Cilimberg
tor of Planning
clntire Road
ottesville, Virginia
22902-4596
Gent emen:
I
the
expe
desi
was asked to give an opinion on the legal ramifications if
County were to repair the Millington Bridge at its own
se, according to its own design, rather than accede to the
n of VDOT.
I find no authority, either case law, statute, or Attorney
Gene aI's Opinion.
B
syst
with
The
high
seco
"End
tota
Furt
the
main
this br idge is now part of the secondary highway
m, I do not believe the County could legally do this
ut a permit from VDOT, which would very likely be denied.
ounty would have to abandon that portion of the secondary
ay over which the bridge lies, taking it out of the
dary system, in which event VDOT would certainly put up
State Maintenance" signs at each end of the bridge, and the
responsibility for maintenance would fall upon the County.
er, if VDOT wished to do so, I believe it could barricade
oad at: each end of the bridge, at the point at which state
enance ends.
erefore, I do not believe this is a feasible solution,
s you can obtain concurrence from VDOT.
Sincerely yours,
C~~C-{'L'2;~ ~JL-
George R. st. John L--
County Attorney
GRSt /tlh
I
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
o F
I ~ TEN T
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
unty, Virginia, does hereby state its intent to rezone property
own as Tax Map 76, Parcel 17A, owned by the Department of Fores-
y, located east of the U. S. Route 29 Bypass, south of Fontaine
enue and west of the University Real Estate Foundation from R-1
CO; and
FURTHER requests the Albemarle County Planning Commission to
h 1d public hearing on said intent to rezone property, and does
r quest that the Planning Commission send its recommendation to
t is Board at the earliest possible date.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
w iting, is a true, correct copy of a resolution of intent
u animously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
C unty, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on Novembe 4, 1992.
~~d.~ounty Supervisors
I
6
"'.
Distributed to 8oard: . I O)3j/C/ ~
o -----+-"".'-r--~-,
Agenda Item !., l Z ' I \ QLI I Lf34
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-45%
(804) 296-5823
MEMoRANDUM
,
I
,
I
TOI:
I
I
I
FRpM:
I
I
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and I ~, 1/
Community Development L1~L/
,
DA~E:
RE~
October 7, 1992
Department of Forestry Property
Ta~ Map 76, Parcel 17A, owned by the Department of Forestry (east
ofithe U. S. Route 29 Bypass, south of Fontaine Avenue and west
oflthe University Real Estate Foundation) is zoned R-1 (see
attached map). Subdivision of this parcel into three parcels,
"Bf, "A-1" and A-2", is shown on the attached. This parcel is
de~ignated for Office Service use in the Comprehensive Plan and
islunder development by the Virginia Department of Forestry for
it~ headquarters with access from Fontaine Avenue. Zoning has
not been changed as this is state property not subject to local
zO*ing. The R-1 has been a "holding" zone for the property in
ca$e it might ever be sold to private interests. The R-1 zoning,
however, poses potential problems for the adjacent University
Re~l Estate Foundation property, Parcel 76-17B, which is zoned CO
with a development plan and proffers. Building setback from R-1
fot CO is 50' with a 20' undisturbed buffer. There is no setback
ad~acent to commercial zoning for CO except that building
sewaration necessary to meet building code required fire ratings.
Tolremove the residential setback requirements from a property
th~t is not developing residentially and to make the Forestry
DeWartment property zoning match the type of development
oc~urring (which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan),
st4ff recommends the Board of Supervisors pass a Resolution of
In~ent to rezone Parcel 76-17A from R-1 to CO.
I
,
vwet/blb
cc~
,
Amelia McCulley
File
~
<YQ
~
0<y'
\9
<>'IS'
~
W
1'--
trio ~ 9$
IItz ~@
<<l . 0::
Et:: 8 ~
o(1)
J::U Z
>
(9
z
F
U)
?j
~
~
\
~
~
-1--_.'"
~
.......
0::
$~
~~
~8
is[
tD _
~
~
I l.L
<1: (jj ~
= ~I'- X
cd <j-~ W
o t3 C\.I
~~~
</
/~Y
d~~~" /
~ ~Y a:l
~ ~ '" \
~~~'V /---.\ \ ~
A\~ ,/ "-, \ \ t:;
'('" /' '\\-x
/' 'I
N)w
//
// "-
//
Q.; // ~
//
//
//
/' /
,-
/tD
:J
~H~
I
~LL1@
O-~co
~<(r-:
FO--
~
ff] ~~o
0:: ~-w
~ ~a::~
~ ~~~
~ffi~~*
~~ a-
I~tti~gf
~~: .wi
;~~3~__
ffia~@1'-
0a:::J1-:~
~gcri~;S
~
w
/
,
zw
\ ~
~.
- - ~
~~~
1'0.
~~
Z
u
z
~
~ 10
~ffi~~@~
O~~~~a..:
co~
t::U}cnr0~~~
IWCO-
tDO::ocn
1'-lJ...-
~l5:!~~~cri~
r-:Jooooo
t=I~
~~
~~
/
/
N~ W
z
- :J
(!) (l) ~- Iffi
z = r-:
- ...
~ 0 Rl~
0 Z J (90:: ~
:r: <C Wfil Zu f2:CO
en (!) ... 9lJ...
- ~ z~ <(0 z
-(\j Z ~ ~ f2
- ::::>Gj ~ n lJ.F<t
~ I (!) ~~
_<C -:>0:: -(J;-~N -g~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~<p ~ 0::- Z
Z ::::> <(- 0
9 0 - ~ 0 ~
~m~N0~~~~r0~l'-ffi~IO~~ >-~ - w
CL ... (\J~ ;~
= u -~ 0 cn~~~t:~:;; ~-~ ('j co ~
W z ~~ ~
I (l) It ::::> = 0-
Z _<C ~ f.2 www~ ~ OU) f2<(
0 .. 0 WWW?:?:~~~~W= = _ w ~ ~<( 0::
?: , II 00 <! =~ ~:~=~=~=~j;:IB=if?L ~_~if~:~:[((~ ~<( _~ t:!
0::: ZZ~ 0::
en ~ 0 = ~i3:J =(\J [l -I~ f.2
<! - U}lJ...f.2~ ~ -~~if~-Rl-~~~-(\J~~~t(f~~~Q
~ 0::: ~ -co
~ :J I~ =<(> )x:t:
W W ~ zzwZ ~ ~@~~~~~~~~~~~fu~~~ =<( 8 ~t 0
0 1 ~
U es ~ ~OO-O .' ~~ ~~
(l) o::-~
~ U __0- ~ ZZZU}U}U}U}U}U}U}U}U}U}U}U}ZZ ww
W 0 O~ ~O-
::::> 0::: S <l u II II 11 11 i3 ..................b~~0~~0~ o::~
en CL (f) cnLLL..LU-: ~~~S~~~~~:J~~:J:J:J:J~ b ~ its ~~ ~
-:-'~~ U ZO-
W
~~-~
<;to
_10
o 1'0
;;r:tO
Z
-C\.I
1 l.J...;
_<1: . (f)
-cd ~ N.
~ I'- N
<;to)
_lO
(tl'-t
W
~~-~
1'-10
010
tJ<;t
Z
iO
/::!
a
Q:
0.
.::::,.
-C\.I
c.:r 4.~ ~
z.-J
-w
tno ~ l.L
-0::: .
X <! (f)
W 0... Z LD
I I I .
I"' 1-
~~ ~r2 ~
Q) _ t:C
,~~ ~<;tl ~ ff
cq I'-: l(~ t\~ I /i!
~- ~ ,v. S
+ &
W
~, ~ :en
!~I'\ ~~ LiJ
$1.., _ <.)
~,'rntoI'0(\J ~
I '",I'0tO$r0 CL
~J:..lJ;. ,
I j'P",~ fX (L ~ (L
<(, ,,";
J;:,'''c.; OCOIO
~,..l f- co to
~ COU'l<;t
. cri a:i a:i
. cicio
W
P?3
iO<i
o U'l
1'0-
1'0
Z
\
\
\
0:: ~
CO~ Q.;
1 010
toZZC\I
I'-:J-(X)
0-00 .
~woco
r-~ 0
/
~
11\
~~
'{~
u
c
.....
o
~ g
...
~~~~
.5 ~~ ffi
c-S :E
-oe>
Oc:O_
~'s::>
::;5~
.~-=
c:O.!!~
co2!!
El/)O
o~ 0
-ClI")-C
....-u
DATE Nu'vtr1A.JX'V ~. ./97~
, I
AGENDA ITEM (1;( I/();f; I n --
NO. I - CV~S
-n / () tl'{J
AGENDA ITEM NAME l)Ot)Y!7 ;)['/77(:( ti/)L {(is ,~ifl/aJI
,
pi C
DEFERRED UNTIL f#if ;Jfc: /6, /97,;J-
/0
, J
Form.3
7/25/86
.
[.)ISTRiGUTt:D T:' u,....,NZD A\ENB\:RS
ON -LUFfS,.k .~.---
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Permitting Process
November 4, 1992
qz .I()'Y ,0l?k
SUBJECT
Discussi
Issuing
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
Building Permit
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION: ----1L-
ATTACHMENTS: Yes ( 2 )
STAFF CO
Messrs.
REVIBWBD BY' ffi
-or
provided a proposal for Board discussion on the subject of implementing changes in
ing Permit Review process that would allow for expeditious issuance of permits that
lify as minor, accessory residential use not requiring health department approval
st not exceeding $30,000.
DISCUSSI
Reviewin and improving the permit review and issuing process was identified as a work plan
objectiv last July and a Process Improvement Team was established with the specific
objectiv s as outlined in the attachment. As this process involves three County departments
and two ther agencies a Total Quality Management (TQM) approach is being applied. The Team
has had two meetings and will review Mr. Bain' s proposal in their identification of
improvem nts to our current process. The Team is still identifying problems and issues with
our curr nt process in extensive detail and will soon be discussing improvements.
The has also identified a need for more efficient processing and the specifics of
Mr. Bain's proposal is one possible way to achieve a Fast Track. The Team has identified
other p ssible ways to achieve this objective, but has not yet defined all the possible
alternat'ves.
ack process is only one area for improvement and will be evaluated as a part of the
rmitting process. The Team is scheduled to meet four times in the next two months
d have a preliminary improvement plan developed for implementation early next year.
RECO
None,
information.
92.158
October 1992
BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS IMPROVEMENT TEAM
OBJECTIVES
o To establish the ground rules for participation in this team
approach to problem solving.
o To adopt a focus on quality as seen from its customers.
o To understand the benefits of quality and the need for quality
improvement.
o To understand and use the concepts and techniques in total
quality management (TQM).
o To understand and use the concept of continuous improvement.
o To gain full participation by all members in a team approach
to problem solving.
o To examine and fully understand the current permit review
process in order to identify every opportunity for
improvement.
o To implement improvements within the departments' authority
and identify other improvements beyond the authority of the
team to implement.
o To develop a procedure for continuous improvement to this
process.
, .
...
\~~
TO:
FROM:
RE:
HEl-10RANDUM
Board of Supervisors
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Permits
I have a concern about how the County and its regulations
(which I believe are necessary for everyone's benefit) are
perceived by the public. 11m sure that the average citizen,
plunking down nearly SlOO.OO for every permit to build something
really simple like a pool or a shed or another kind of
outbuilding, and then being told that it would take at least 7 to
10 days for the permit to be issued, will not come away with a
very positive impression. I think it important that we recognize
the need for the regulation but also the need to minimize hassle
for the individual.
I would like to propose a change in existing prQcedures
(which I think the Staff would be receptive to) and follow it
through. Since we are in the process of reorganizing permitting
and inspections functions I believe this is an opportune time to
bring this matter up. I believe the following would be
appropr. iate:
"Fast track permitting would be available for the
construction of any minor, accessory residential use not
requiring health department approval. Minor would be
defined as construction where the estimated total
project budget would not exceed $30,000.00, or such
higher amount as the Director of Inspection determines
in an individual case based upon the particular
circumstances of the project."
Any application for a building permit which qualifies for
"fast track" approval, would be processed and a final permit
would be available for pick-up at the Department of Inspections
by 5 :00 p.m. of the day following filing of the application
provided the application is filed with the required information
prior to 10:00 a.m.
The review process will operate as outlined on the enclosed
description.
I believe that we have in place all of the elements required
to undertake such a fast track process with the exception of the
computer scanner which would eliminate the need to carry existing
exhibits around to the different departments. These I believe
are relatively inexpensive (less than $1,500.00 each).
Personnel
assigned to fast track review would have to be people with a
positive attitude about the process or it will fall on its face.
I do think the definition of projects qualifying for fast track
needs very careful thought by those involved in the process, as
do the deadlines, etc.
I believe this Board should look
carefully at this proposal.
De cription of Fast Track process:
Upon arrival at the Inspections Department each applicant
ld be asked a few brief questions by the person on duty to
ablish qualification for Fast Track. If the applicant
lified he or she would be given a set of written instructions
ting the items of information and exhibits required for the
uance of the permit. The application should note prominently
t provision of the necessary information and exhibits is the
ap licant's responsibility whether or not he or she is requested
verbally to provide the information. Only if a noted item of
information or an exhibit is stricken from the instructions in
writing initialed by an official of the Inspections Department
will the applicant be excused from the provision of the otherwise
required item. This is to protect the County from angry
a plicants who get held up because the person on duty failed to
ask fo.:r all of the required information. Any sketches or
diagrams which are required to accompany the application should
be distinct enough to be legibly picked up by a computer scanner
s that the entire application and necessary exhibits can be
1 gged into the County computer system. Any applicaton which
i volves exhibits which cannot be scanned is automatically
d'squalified for Fast Track, although staff should have on hand
a the Inspections Department materials to allow applicants to re
s etch drawings, etc., or copy plats in a fashion which will make
t ern "scannable".
Once the application for a Fast Track permit has been filed
will be immediately logged into the computer system. In
dition, the person on duty shall make an appointment with the
plicant for an onsite inspection and shall schedule such
spection to occur prior to 3:00 p.m. the following day. If the
plicant cannot accommodate this schedule (and if his or her
esence is required for the inspection) the application will not
alify for Fast Track.
Every Department involved in the review of Fast Track
rmits shall have one staff member and one back up (one of whom
all be present to perform this duty each day) assigned to the
r view of Fast Track applications. This staffer shall ca11 up on
his or her computer by 1:00 p.m. each day all applications which
have been filed that day under the Fast Track category. The
staffer shall review the application as it appears on the
computer and shall note in the appropriate fashion on the
a plication approval, questions, or objections. All departments
shall have completed their initial review of that day's Fast
Track applications by 3:00 and reported their response on the
application appearing on their computer screen. At 3:00 p.m.
Inspections shall review all Fast Track applications filed that
ay and note any questions or objections. Inspections shall try
o resolve questions and objections at the staff level. If
urther information is required of the applicant, or if an
bjection which cannot be resolved at the staff level arises, an
ffort shall be made to contact the applicant by phone (the
pplication will provide a number where the applicant or his or
I er agent can be reached between 3:00 and 5:00 p,m. on the day of
t.he filing). The results of the physical inspection can be
honed into the Department if the inspection occurs at a time
hen the inspector cannot return to the office prior to the
eadline for issuance of the permit on the day after the filing.
....--r
_ l/# ,. ~
l-iEr.10RANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Board of Supervisors
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Permits
I have a concern about how the County and its regulations
(which I believe are necessary for everyone's benefit) are
perceived by the public. I'm sure that the average citizen,
plunking down nearly $100.00 for every permit to build something
really simple like a pool or a shed or another kind of
outbuilding, and then being told that it would take at least 7 to
10 days for the permit to be issued, will not come away with a
very positive impression. I think it important that we recognize
the need for the regulation but also the need to minimize hassle
for the individual.
I would like to propose a change in existing pr~cedures
(which I think the Staff would be receptive to) and follow it
through. Since we are in the process of reorganizing permitting
and inspections functions I believe this is an opportune time to
bring this matter up.
appropriate:
I believe the following would be
,..
"Fast track permitting would be available for the
construction of any minor, accessory residential use not
requiring health department approval. Minor would be
defined as construction where the estimated total
project budget would not exceed $30,000.00, or such
higher amount as the Director of Inspection determines
in an individual case based upon the particular
circumstances of the project."
Any application for a building permit which qualifies for
"fast track" approval, would be processed and a final permit
would be available for pick-up at the Department of Inspections
by 5:00 p.m. of the day following filing of the application
provided the application is filed with the required information
prior to 10:00 a.m.
The review process will operate as outlined on the enclosed
description.
I believe that we have in place all of the elements required
to undertake such a fast track process with the exception of the
computer scanner which would eliminate the need to carry existing
exhibits around to the different departments. These I believe
are relatively inexpensive (less than $1,500.00 each). Personnel
assigned to fast track review would have to be people with a
positive attitude about the process or it will fall on .its face.
I do think the definition of projects qualifying for fast track
needs very careful thought by those involved in the process, as
do the deadlines, etc.
I believe this Board should look
carefully at this proposal.
,. .
Description of Fast Track process:
Upon arrival at the Inspections Department each applicant
would be asked a few brief questions by the person on duty to
establish qualification for Fast Track. If the applicant
qualified he or she would be given a set of written instructions
listing the items of information and exhibits required for the
issuance of the pe rm i t. The appl icat ion should note prom i nen tly
that provision of the necessary information and exhibits is the
applicant's responsibility whether or not he or she is requested
verbally to provide the information. Only if a noted item of
information or an exhibit is stricken from the instructions in
writing initialed by an official of the Inspections Department
will the applicant be excused from the provision of the otherwise
required item. This is to protect the County from angry
applicants who get held up because the person on duty failed to
ask for all of the required information. Any sketches or
diagrams which are required to accompany the application should
be distinct enough to be legibly picked up by a computer scanner
so that the entire application and necessary exhibits can be
logged into the County computer system. Any applicaton which
involves exhibits which cannot be scanned is automatically
disqualified for Fast Track, although staff should have on hand
at the Inspections Department materials to allow applicants to re
sketch drawings, etc., or copy plats in a fashion which will make
them "scannable".
Once the application for a Fast Track permit has been filed
it will be immediately logged into the computer system. In
addi t ion, the pe rson on duty shall make an appointment with the
applicant for an onsite inspection and shall schedule such
inspection to occur prior to 3:00 p.m. the following day. If the
applicant cannot accommodate this schedule (and if his or her
presence is required for the inspection) the application will not
qualify for Fast Track.
Every Department involved in the review of Fast Track
permits shall have one staff member and one back up (one of whom
shall be present to perform this duty each day) assigned to the
review of Fast Track applications. This staffer shall call up on
his or her computer by l:OO p.m. each day all applications which
have been filed that day under the Fast Track category. The
staffer shall review the application as it appe-ars on the
computer and shall note in the appropriate fashion on the
application approval, questions, or objections. All departments
shall have completed their initial review of that day's Fast
Track applications by 3:00 and reported their response on the
application appearing on their computer screen. At 3:00 p.m.
Inspections shall review all Fast Track applications filed that
day and note any quest ions or objections. Inspections shall try
to resolve questions and objections at the staff level. If
further information is required of the applicant, or if an
objection which cannot be resolved at the staff level arises, an
effort shall be made to contact the applicant by phone (the
application will provide a number where the applicant or his or
her agent can be reached between 3:00 and 5:00 p.m. on the day of
the filing). The results of the physical inspection can be
phoned into the Department if the inspection occurs at a time
when the inspector cannot return to the office prior to the
deadline for issuance of the permit on the day after the filing.
Distributed to Board: J 1\ bVl klk.,
, /'At ~.(~~?yJ
Agenda Item 1...0. '::'~LULl~.~.'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-45%
(804) 2%-5823
M MORANDUM
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors / I
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and community~~
Development
October 23, 1992
Recreational Facilities Authority - Request
e Recreational Facilities Authority, at its meeting on August
, 1992, adopted a Resolution requesting the Board of
pervisors to delete the reference in paragraph #6 to
d velopment lots and any other reference to development lots that
might occur in the standard easement form (attached easement and
minutes). This item has been scheduled for the Board's review at
t e November 4, 1992 meeting. David Bass, Chairman of the
R creational Facilities Authority, will be available at the
N vember 4 meeting to answer any questions.
Cjjcw
David Bass
1 - .
lease of the Rural Preservation Tract, to advertise the sale of
goods or services produced incidental to a permitted use of the
Rural Preservation Tract or to provide notice necessary for the
protection of the Rural Preservation Tract and for giving
directions to visitors. No such sign shall exceed three by three
feet in size.
3. No Rural Preservation Tract shall be diminished in size.
4. No timber cutting shall be permitted except in accord with a plan
subject to approval by the Grantees. Clearing of dead wood shall
be permitted without a plan. Open land shall be maintained using
sound conservation practices.
5. Grading, blasting, earth removal, fill, or waste activity is
prohibited except for purposes of timbering in accordance with a
plan approved as per paragraph 4. above or for dam construction to
create private ponds or lakes on the Rural Preservation Tract
pursuant to a plan approved by the Grantees. Construction of
permitted buildings and connecting private roads is exempt from
these requirements. Mining and drilling of wells except as
necessary for water is prohibited on the Rural Preservation Tract.
6. No permanent or temporary building or structure, shall be built or
maintained on the Rural Preservation Tract ]~igP::::::HJ!t:~::i#x::::::!~Y~ff9g!nii:I:
:f##l other than (i) a permanent single-family dwelling and
outbuildings commonly or appropriately incidental thereto and (ii)
farm buildings and structures.
7. Industrial or commercial activities other than farming,
silviculture or horticulture are prohibited.
3
~
.
8. Representatives of the Grantees may enter the Rural Preservation
Tract from time to time for the purpose of Inspection and
enforcement of the terms of this easement after permission from or
reasonable notice to the owner or the owner's representative.
9. Grantors, their heirs, successors and assigns shall notify the
Grantees in writing within ten (10) days after closing of any
transfer or sale of the Rural Preservation Tract. In any deed
conveying the Rural Preservation Tract, this easement shall be
referenced by Deed Book and Page Number in the deed of conveyance.
10. Whenever a written request for the Grantees' approval pursuant
hereto is submitted by certified mail to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of the County and the Chairman of the Authority and
both the County and the Authority fail to respond in writing within
forty-five (45) days of receipt of such request by the Clerk, then
the Grantees shall be deemed to have approved the request and the
Grantor may proceed with the action for which approval was
requested.
11. No consent or approval of the Grantees hereunder shall be deemed
given, except as provided in paragraph 10. hereof, unless both the
County and the Authority agree in writing.
Although this easement in gross will benefit the public as
described above, nothing herein shall be construed to convey to the
public any rights of access to or use of the property described herein.
Grantors, their heirs, successors and assigns hereby retain exclusive
right to such access and use, subject to the terms hereof.
4
Acceptance of this easement by the County of Albemarle and the
Public Recreational Facilities Authority of Albemarle County is
authorized by Section 10.1-1701 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended.
If the Authority should (a) be dissolved or in any other way cease
its corporate existence, or for any other reason be unable to act to
enforce the restrictions provided for herein, or (b) acquire fee title
to the land subject to this easement, then all rights of the Authority
in the foregoing easement shall automatically vest in the Virginia
Outdoors Foundation, a body politic of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
5
j
}
Witness the following signatures and seals:
Grantor
Grantor
6
( SEAL)
(S EAL)
l '<.-..J ~
Accepted:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
By:
(SEAL)
Director of Planning and Community Development
Agent for the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY
By: (SEAL)
Chairman
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF
TO WIT:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this
day of
, 19
, by
, the Grantor(s) therein.
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF
TO WIT:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this
day of
, 19_, by
Director of Planning and Community
Development, Agent of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors,
Grantee therein.
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
7
..
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF
TO WIT:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this
day of
, 19_, by
, Chairman of the Public Recreational
Facilities Authority of Albemarle County Grantee therein.
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
8
.j
"
HISTORIC RESOURCE RURAL PRESERVATION TRACT EASEMENT
(Insert in pro-forma easement as first four restrictions)
1. The parties at the time of the execution of this Deed of Easement
shall document the appearance of the Rural Preservation Tract and
historic structures thereon through photographic or other means
acceptable to both the Grantor and the Grantees and shall designate
any structures on such tract which are to be protected as "historic
structures" hereunder. The negatives of the said documentary
photographs shall be stored permanently in the offices of the Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County. Thereafter, the
Rural Preservation Tract shall be maintained and preserved in its
documented state provided, however, that such structural changes,
alterations, additions, or improvements as would not, in the
opinion of the Grantees, fundamentally alter the architectural
significance or historic character of the historic structures
located on the Preservation Tract and their setting may be made
thereto by the Grantor, but only upon prior written approval of the
Grantees. In making such determination, the Grantees may consult
with the Virginia Historic Resources Board, Albemarle County
Architectural Review Board and other appropriate individuals,
organizations and entities.
2. No historic structure shall be demolished or removed from the Rural
Preservation Tract and no other building or structure shall be
constructed, altered, restored, renovated, extended, or demolished
on the Rural Preservation Tract except in a way that would, in the
opinion of the Grantees, be in keeping with the historic character
~ ,
of any historic structure located on the Preservation Tract and
their settings, and provided that the prior written approval of the
Grantees to such actions shall have been obtained.
3. No cleaning, repointing, waterproofing, or painting of the exterior
of any historic structure located on the Preservation Tract shall
be undertaken unless the prior written approval of the Grantees
shall have been obtained.
4. No archaeological features or sites of the Rural Preservation Tract
shall be disturbed or excavated unless approved by the Grantees
upon review of a survey and documentation of the site prepared by a
qualified archeologist. Archaeological artifacts found on the
Rural Preservation Tract shall remain the property of the Grantor,
but may, with the approval of the Grantees, be conserved, stl~died,
and/or stored by the archaeological staff of the Division of
Historic Landmarks, Department of Conservation and Historic
Resources, or its successors.
~
/'
WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION RURAL PRESERVATION TRACT EASEMENT
(Add to restriction 6, in pro-forma easement)
Notwithstanding other provisions contained in this easement, clearing,
construction and other development for permitted structures and allowed
appurtenances shall be confined to an area not to exceed two (2) acres
in extent. The remainder of the Rural Preservation Tract shall be left
in an undisturbed natural condition provided that the Grantees may allow
other uses not inconsistent with this easement upon finding that
measures proposed by the Grantor will protect the public drinking water
supply to a degree at least equivalent to maintenance of the area in a
natural state.
.. .J .JA
August 27, 1992
,
T~e Public Recreational Facilities Authority met on August 27,
1~92 Planning Department Conference Room, County Office Building
a~ 4 p.m. Those members present were Tim Lindstrom, David Bass,
S ott Peyton, Raymond Reiss, and David Emmitt. Absent from the
meting were Norma Diehl, John Birdsall, Ricardo Preve and Guy B.
Agnor, Jr. Staff member present - Rich Tarbell.
I
,
I
Q~orum was established and meeting called to order.
I
I
T~e minutes of April 9, 1992 and July 9, 1992 were approved as
s~bmitted.
I
I
E~ection of Officers:
I
I
T~e following nominations for officers were made:
I
i
I Chairman - David Bass
Vice-Chairman - Raymond Reiss
Secretary - Wayne Cilimberg
E~ch nomination was seconded and carried unanimously.
I
I
Mr. Bass suggested that the Chairman position be rotated
arnually, if there are people willing to serve.
I
I
Mr. Bass noted that at the end of this year, unless reappointed,
M~. Lindstrom, Mr. Peyton, and Mr. Reiss terms expire.
I
I
I
I
I
-r----------------------------------------
Discussion of Rural Preservation Easement Lan discussed
e tensivel at Jul 9 meetin
I
I
Standard Easement Form--#6 page 3:
I
I
No permanent or temporary building or structure, shall be
buil t or maintained on the Rural Preservation Tract !tngpf::sn
~ny::::~~M~w.9p.i~ijp::!:$91B) other than (i) a permanent s ingre~...........
famTlydwerrTrigaridoutbuildings commonly or appropriately
incidental thereto and (ii) farm buildings and structures.
M~. Emmitt noted that he was not at the July 9 meeting, but
ppinted out that there was alot of concern over what applied to
t~e preservation tract and commercial activities on those (bed
ahd breakfast). He noted that the restriction on public access--
apyone who would take the preservation tract and provide access
fpr the enjoyment of that tract--should be encouraged.
I
I
M~. Bass asked Mr. Lindstrom to explain the proposed amendments
1
__ ,d
see attachments to July 9 minutes).
r. Lindstrom noted that Mr. McCallum submitted an easement and
uestioned the restrictions on development on the preservation
ract. Are we telling people things that we are expressly
rohibiting on the preservation tract that we are allowing on the
evelopment tracts? He noted that development tracts are
entioned in the easement because the Board of Supervisors wanted
he limitation on dwelling units.
~r. Lindstrom noted that the Authority prefers not to be involved
ith the development tracts and would like this deleted from the
asement.
r. Bass noted that (page 3, #6 of the easement) "nor on any
evelopment lot" caused a problem because the legal description
ad to include not just the preservation tract, but the entire
ubdivision development. This lead to questions of restrictions
n the preservation tract. He noted that he felt the consensus
f the July 9 meeting was to recommend to the Board of
upervisors that the language "nor on any development lot" be
liminated from the easement language. The legal description
ould then be that part of the development that is the
reservation tract.
I
~r. Emmitt noted that the way the easement is written now, there
ould be a problem if you wanted to cut timber on a development
ract.
I
r. Lindstrom proposed that a formal resolution be presented to
he Board of Supervisors asking that the easement language be
mended.
r. Tarbell noted that this is two issues (1) describing the
ural preservation tract; and (2) commercial use on the rural
reservation tract.
I
r. Keeler stated that assuming the Zoning Ordinance remains as
urrently written it would have no effect on reservoir watershed,
ut outside the reservoir watershed the owner of development lots
ould apply for a special use permit for additional division of
he lot and/or additional dwelling units.
r. Lindstrom noted that assuming the easements have been legally
ecorded they superede the Board's authority. The Authority can
nforce an easement against the zoning. He noted that if the
oard were of the opinion with respect to either preservation
ract or development tracts to allow increased density of the
oning, they could do this.
2
"-_.~ J
Mr. Emmitt noted that this Authority is trying to preserve
Barcels that are being offered and what is done on the
qevelopment tract.
I
I
;r. Lindstrom noted that he felt the purpose of the Recreational
acilities Authority is to see that the preservation tracts could
ot in any way be tampered with in so far as legally they could
~e removed from the political process.
I
I
~r. Lindstrom made the following motion:
Adopt a resolution recommending to the Board of Supervisors
that they delete the reference in paragraph #6 to
development lots and any other reference to development lots
that might occur in the standard easement form.
Mr. Reiss seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
I
I
I
~r. Lindstrom noted that someone from this Authority should
ttend the Board of Supervisors meeting to explain why this
ecommendation is being made.
I
I
I
~tandard Easement Form--#7 page 3:
Industrial or commercial activities other than farming,
..............................
..............................
~gain, Mr. Bass asked Mr. Lindstrom to explain the proposed
almendments (see attachments to July 9 minutes).
I
~r. Lindstrom noted that this provision restricts the industrial
~nd commercial activities other than farming, silvicultural or
~orticultural. Mr. McCallum's concern was that a business (such
als computer applications) operated in home may be prohibited.
~herefore, Mr. McCallum added the "shaded area" to the easement.
I
I
~r. Bass asked without going to the Zoning Administrator, what in
he way of business, other than silviculture or horticulture,
hat can one do on a farm in the Rural Area?
I
I
~r. Keeler stated that without going to the Board of Supervisors
~nd as a matter of right, there is a Home Occupation Class A
which allows you to conduct a business within a dwelling unit.
I
~ou can not have any employees other than family members. rrhere
I
I
3
. #~
..
s a second Home Occupation that requires a special use permit
hich allows you to use an accessory structure and/or you can
ave employees other than family members. He noted that this
ermit is issued administratively if there is no objection by
djoining property owners.
r. Keeler noted that there are two different categories for a
ed and breakfast. One as a matter of right which allows you to
ake available within your home rooms to accommodate overnight
uests.
r. Bass noted that the Authority discussed omitting Mr.
cCallum's suggestion and let people apply to this Authority for
ses that are not permitted.
r. Emmitt noted that this would create a different set of
roblems.
r. Lindstrom asked if there were any concerns with the language
s proposed by Mr. McCullum.
r. Peyton stated his concern that someone who is actively
'nvolved in agriculture may need to supplement his income
ossibly with a bed and breakfast operation.
r. Lindstrom stated that the Authority is dealing with a tract
f rural land where the owner has extracted all of the
evelopment potential and is now left with the residue. He noted
hat rural preservation restrictions on the property are part of
he legal record and the property owner would be aware of this.
Peyton stated that property that has been in a family for
ultiple generations, may have a parent or grandparent through
ecessity used all development potential. The rural preservation
ract continues to be in that family. The property owner may
ontinue to work a viable agricultural enterprise, but may still
eed to supplement his income. He noted his concern about
the property owners capacity to supplement his
r. Reiss stated that perhaps a bed and breakfast could be
llowed on a rural preservation tract provided it does not exceed
hree rooms.
r. Lindstrom suggested the definition of a bed and breakfast be
dded to the rural preservation language.
r. Keeler noted that the language in #7 of the rural
reservation easement is similar to that for a bed and breakfast.
e noted that "family members" should be included.
4
.,. ," .~
.
.
~r. Bass ascertained that if #7 were left as originally drafted
and someone wanted to a use other than silviculture or
~orticulture, they would have to request an amendment to this
~asement from the Board of Supervisors and this Authority.
Mr. Lindstrom stated that this Authority should review this
I . ..
~mendment request prlor to the Board of Supervlsors reVlew as the
~oard would probably require a recommendation from this
~uthority. He noted that there are two options (1) denial; and,
(12) if there is a significant reason to justify exception,
~ecornrnend approval of the amendment to the Board of Supervisors.
1
~r. Peyton ascertained that the Authority would be agreeable to
~onsidering amendments to the rural preservation development
~asement.
I
I
Mr. Bass stated that he felt the easement language should remain
I
'S approved.
I
Mr. Lindstrom stated the issue of rural preservation will have to
~e innovative to make it work.
I
I
Mir. Tarbell recommended that the "shaded area", which deals
mainly with visibility, remain as this is a simple zoning
qlearance. Traffic concerns, etc would have to be reviewed by
tihis Authority.
I
I
~r. Lindstrom stated that he felt requesting the Board of
slupervisors to adopt a resolution deleting the reference in
paragraph #6 to development lots and any other reference to
dlevelopment lots that might occur in the standard easement form
ils sufficient. He noted that no other modifications to the
~asement are necessary at this time.
I
I
I
qonsensus of the Authority was to leave #7 as originally written.
I
I
I
I
I
-1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
The Authority unanimously agreed to cancel the October meeting.
I
I
I
Ufcoming meetings for 1993:
January 14, 1993
April 8, 1993
July 8, 1993
October 14, 1993
T~e meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
------------------------------
David Bass, Chairman
5
AGENDA
Agricul
Committ
SUBJECT
Establi
Industr
STAFF C
Messrs.
BACKGRO
The Com
foresta
needs
establi
for you
DISCUSS
Staff e
Staff
agricul
the Boa
through
cons ide
outline
92.159
D'<;T"--UTr:D TO. _,-.,-,c, 1',~'I"'c"'''
l.~ ''\Ili ...: i .~) '1~~"~""~""":""'<~~~'::'''''.)
ON ---LQ.t.3',).{~1 "~_.__._~~-
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA DATE:
November 4, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
Oz I I' IV;" l()?)~
1 . I. U .I.J.,.~_ U
Industry
support
ACTION:~
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
itr
Brandenburger
REVIEWED BY:
rehensive Plan identified a strategy to support and promote the agriculture and
industries in the county by creating a local advisory committee to analyze marketing
nd develop and recommend programs supporting the industry. Staff proposes
hing this committee in the near future and has identified a committee "work outline"
consideration (attachment).
ON:
visions 6-9 months for the committee to develop a report for Board consideration.
also proposes a committee of 7-10 members from var~ous
ure/forestry/horticulture industry groups in addition to possible participation by
d or Planning Commission. Selection of committee members from the industries can be
the public notice process or staff can identify potential representatives for Board
ation. If the Board supports the establishment of the committee, and its work
a decision on the selection process is required before staff can proceed.
ATION:
h an Agriculture/Forestry Industry Support Committee either through the public notice
or through staff recommendation of potential representatives.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-45%
(804) 296-5823
M MORANOUM
Bob Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
. . 1)ef.> . f f . tIt
Oavld B. Benlsh, Chle 0 Communl y Oeve opmen
October 28, 1992
Agriculture/Forestry Industry Support Committee
e of the projects in this year's work program for the Planning
partment is the establishment of a Agricultural/Forestal
dustry Advisory Committee. This is a recommendation of the
mprehensive Plan and is listed as a high priority action in the
mprehensive Plan. Staff is currently developing background
formation for this project. Attached is a proposed scope of
rk for this project.
is my hope that the committee could be established by
cember. Therefore, I am requesting that discussion of this
oject and committee appointment be scheduled for Board of
pervisors consideration at the earliest possible date. The
tached scope of work includes a discussion of committee
mbership. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
ntact me.
B/jcw
TACHMENT
GRICULTURAL-FORESTAL INDUSTRIES SUPPORT COKMITTEE--WORK OUTLINE
ur ose: To develop recommendations for efforts to support and
romote the agricultural and forestal industries in the County
(and region). The establishment of the committee is a
ecommendation of the comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan
trategy states:
"Create a local advisory committee on the agricultural
and forestal industry to analyze marketing needs and
develop and recommend programs supporting the industry.
"(p.56).
eed: Agriculture and forestry activities are a major
ontributor to the economy of Albemarle County. The County is in
he top 20 percent of counties in Virginia for agricultural
roducts sold ranking 16th in terms of cash receipts for
ivestock and 27th for crops (Virginia Agricultural statistics
ervice based on 1987 Census data). These totals are exclusive
f cash receipts related to the equestrian industry which is not
onsidered as an agricultural activity for census tabulations.
irginia statistics for 1986 indicate that 35.5 million board
eet of saw timber is removed annually in the County with an
verage value of $2.5 million. 59.7 million board feet of timber
's grown annually. Eighteen (18) Albemarle County businesses are
elated to the timber industry.
esides its direct economic benefit agriculture and forestry also
rovide related benefits such as: protection of watersupply
atershed (with use of proper conservation techniques);
reservation of natural, scenic, historic landscapes, and open
paces; and the provision of wildlife habitat.
owever, it is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain viable
gricultural and forestal operations. The number of farms in
he County have decreased from 830 in 1982 to 772 in 1987. This
ommittee will help define how the County can assist in the
s pport of these industries.
e Comprehensive Plan lists several strategies which could
courage support of agricultural/forestal industries. These
clude:
. Support the Virginia Cooperative Extension Service's efforts
to identify, publicize, and provide technical assistance for
alternative agricultural and forestal activities in the
County. Assist in the identification of activities
particularly adaptable and marketable in Albemarle County.
........... .. .
I Assist in the development of marketing brochures publicizing
agricultural and forestal products in Albemarle County.
Include "u-pick-it" information and list stores selling
Albemarle products locally.
I Encourage the purchase of local products by local
businesses, schools, and institutions, possibly through
promotional activities and economic incentives.
I Assess the need for a local or regional farmer's market and,
if feasible, coordinate its development with the City of
Charlottesville and the proposed statewide farmer's market
system.
I Encourage the establishment of local storage and processing
facilities, possibly through the authorization of Industrial
Revenue Bonds or other financing mechanisms.
rescrintion of Work:
1. Analyze the agricultural/forestal activities in the County
to determine the character and trends for agriculture and
forestry (predominant production activities; those in
decline; those showing growth potential; etc.)
2. Evaluate obstacles to sustaining viable agricultural/
forestal activities in the County.
3. Evaluate and recommend specific efforts to support and
encourage the agricultural and forestal industries. This
would include the strategies listed in the Comprehensive
Plan as well as others, including a permanent location for a
County fairgrounds/agricultural exposition.
4. Develop a report for the Board of Supervisors which proposes
County pOlicies/strategies for supporting agricultural
forestal industries in Albemarle County.
5. Although the major charge of the committee is to address the
promotion of agricultural and forestal industries, the
committee may also need to address protection of the
resource base as it affects support and promotion of the
industries.
6. This committee could also be utilized to address potential
impacts of proposed regulatory measures, tax programs,
resource protection programs, or other issues which may
affect agricultural/forestal interests as these issues
arise.
ime Frame: Committee work on development of a report (#4 above)
hould be completed within 6 to 9 months after the establishment
f the Committee. The Committee could be continued beyond the
eport to oversee implementation of the recommended strategies.
s noted in #6 above, the committee could also be used from time
o time as a forum for discussion of issues relevant to or
ffecting the agricultural/forestal industry.
taffin: The Committee would be staffed by the Department of
lanning & Community Development. However, significant input and
'nformation would be anticipated from the Virginia Cooperative
xtension Office and other "outside sources" such as
epresentatives from Virginia Tech, and other organizations
'nvolved in agriculture and forestry.
ommittee Membershi: One approach for appointing committee
embers suggested by a staff member of the Virginia Cooperative
xtension service is to have representatives from various types
f agricultural, horticultural, forestal activities as well as a
ember(s) of the business community with expertise in economics
nd marketing. Although helpful, this economic/marketing
erson(s) would not necessarily have to be involved with or
xperienced in agriculture. staff would recommend this approach.
t is recommended that the Committee be limited to seven to ten
embers. Below is a general list of industry groups/ activities
hich should be considered for representation on this Committee:
1. Apples, peaches
2 . Vineyards
3. Horses
4. Cattle
5. Small animals
6. Ornamental agriculture (nurseries and greenhouses)
7. Forestry (government and consulting foresters, pulpwood
and timber producers)
8. Alternative "crops" (Christmas trees, vegetables,
herbs, cheese, mushrooms).
..
'"
Edward H. Bal . Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virgin~ 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
lorrest R Marshall. Jr
Scollsville
David P Bowe man
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
M:
Melvin Breeden, Director
Finance Department
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
November 5, 1992
Appropriation Requests
meeting on November 4, 1992, the Board of Supervisors
following requests for appropriations:
Agenda Item No. 13a. Appropriation: FY 1991-92 School Fund
rry-Over Balance (deferred from October 14, 1992).
APPROVED reappropriation of FY 1991/92 school fund balance to
f nd teacher bonus and reallocation of 1991/92 balances. Attached
is the signed appropriation form.
Agenda Item No. 13b. Early Childhood Development Grant for
Brownsville Elementary School.
APPROVED Early Childhood Development Grant for Brownsville
Elementary School from the State Department of Education. Attached
is the signed appropriation form.
Agenda Item No. 13c. Regional Adult Education Specialist Grant.
APPROVED Regional Adult Education Specialist Grant from the
State Department of Education. Attached is the signed appropri-
ation form.
LE :ec
Attachments (3)
cc: Roxanne White
Robert W. paskel
Tracy Holt
..
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920019
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
SCHOOL
OF APPROPRIATION:
OF TEACHER BONUS AND REALLOCATION OF FY 91/92 BALANCES.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
61101112100 TEACHER BONUS $577,100.00
61101601300 BROADUS WOOD 1,439.00
61101601300 BROWNSVILLE 3,423.00
61101601300 CROZET 1,497.00
61101601300 GREER 16,699.00
61101601300 HOLLYMEAD 758.00
61101601300 MERIWETHER LEWIS 7,398.00
61101601300 RED HILL 13,301.00
61101601300 SCOTTSVILLE 998.00
61101601300 STONE ROBINSON 7,147.00
61101601300 STONY POINT 3,091.00
61101601300 WOODBROOK 3,932.00
61101601300 YANCEY 1,250.00
61101601300 CALE 3,028.00
61101601300 MURRAY ELEMENTARY 1,942.00
61101601300 BURLEY 7,959.00
61101601300 HENLEY 17,608.00
61101601300 JOUETT 10,145.0.0
61101601300 WALTON 565.00
61101601300 ALBEMARLE (1,535.00)
61101601300 WESTERN 24,117.00
61101601300 MURRAY (305.00)
61101580000 SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE 73,500.00
TOTAL
$775,057.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2200 51000510100 SCHOOL FUND BALANCE $775,057.00
TOTAL
$775,057.00
**** *******************************************************************
STING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
VALS :
SIGNATURE
DATE
/c/'~~h2
/ '/
//~-S:-;?~
TOR OF FINANCE
~;?~-
OF SUPERVISORS
.....-/
"
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC
YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920020
TYPE F APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO
X
SCHOOL
PURP SE OF APPROPRIATION:
EARL CHILDHOOD GRANT.
XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
1311260202112100 SALARIES-TEACHER $29,000.00
1311 60202114100 SALARIES-TEACHER ASSISTANT 8,000.00
1311 60202135000 PIT WAGES-CLERICAL 1,500.00
1311 60202152100 SUB/WAGES-TEACHER 7,200.00
1311 60202160300 STIPENDS-STAFF CURRICULUM DEV 9,500.00
1311 60202210000 FICA 4,300.00
1311 60202221000 RETIREMENT 4,500.00
1311 60202231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 1,210.00
1311 60202232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 60.00
1311 60202241000 LIFE INSURANCE 230.00
1311 60202312700 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-CONSULTANTS 15,000.00
1311 60202350000 PRINTING/BINDING. 300.00
1311 60202520301 TELEPHONE 2,000.00
1311 60202540100 LEASE/RENT-EQUIPMENT 10,000.00
1311 60202550100 TRAVEL 7,000.00
1311 60202580500 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 12,850.00
1311 60202600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,000.00
1311 60202601300 INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 12,500.00
1311 60202800100 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 16,000.00
TOTAL
$142,150.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2311 24000240502 EARLY CHILDHOOD GRANT $142,150.00
TOTAL
$142,150.00
**** *******************************************************************
DIRE OF FINANCE
STING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
OF SUPERVISORS
~XN4~
4~
DATE
/c' -7 ,>j - (7.?
//-5-YJ--
FISCl L YEAR
~
.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
92/93
NUMBER
920021
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVElDTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO X
SCHOOL
PURP(~SE OF APPROPRIATION:
REGI(DNAL ADULT EDUCATION SPECIALIST GRANT.
~XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
1211 61107111400 SALARIES-OTHER MANAGEMENT $22,960.00
1211 61107210000 FICA 1,756.00
1211 61107221000 RETIREMENT 2,577.00
1211 61107231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 666.00
1211 61107232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 33.00
1211 61107241000 LIFE INSURANCE 268.00
TOTAL
$28,260.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
22001D24000240252 REGIONAL ADULT EDUC SPECIALIST GRANT $28,260.00
**** *******************************************************************
TOTAL
$28,260.00
REQU~STING COST CENTER:
APPR(DVALS :
DIRE(~TOR OF FINANCE
BOARlb OF SUPERVISORS
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
~~~
/&> -.2'Z(-j"7....-.
//-~~~
, 0 - ( c( -...., L
... \n.~~o"~? .
'1Z . 'rooJ'..0:2- ~
., .
ALBEMARLE COUN1Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Robert W. Paskel, Division superintenden~
Request for Appropriation of FY 1991-92 School Fund
Balance
October 13, 1992
At its meeting on October 12, 1992, the School Board
f'nalized its discussions relating to the FY 1991-92 carryover
b lance of $775,057. The School Board agreed to allow the
i dividual schools which ended the fiscal year with a positive
b lance to carry forward their ending balance to the 1992-93
f'scal year. In addition, the School Board approved the
d'sbursement of a $425 bonus to all teachers and an additional
$425 bonus to those teachers at the top of the teacher salary
s ale. The specifics related to the distribution of the bonus
w'll be addressed by the School Board at a later date. Finally,
t e School Board recommended the remaining $73,500 be kept in a
S hool Board reserve.
In summary, it is requested the Board of Supervisors approve
t e reappropriation of the FY 1991-92 school fund balance as
follows:
$577,100
124,457
73.500
$775,057
Teachers' Bonus
School Cost Center Balances
School Board Reserve
The specific budget codes and amounts are listed on the
achment. Please feel free to contact me should you require
ther information. Thank you.
xc: Melvin Breeden
Lettie Neher
Carole Hastings
Tracy Holt
., tt
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
REAPPROPRIATION OF FY 1991-92 SCHOOL FUND BALANCE
TEACHER BONUS
1-2100 - 61101- 112100
$577,100
SCHOOL COST CENTER BALANCE
BROADUS WOOD 1-2201 - 61101- 601300 $1 ,439
BROWNSVILLE 1-2202 - 61101- 601300 $3,423
CROZET 1-2203 - 61101- 601300 $1 ,497
GREER 1-2204 - 61101- 601300 $16,699
HOLL YM EAD 1-2205 - 61101- 601300 $758
MERIWETHER LEWIS 1-2206 - 61101- 601300 $7,398
RED HILL 1-2207 - 61101- 601300 $13,301
SCOTTSVILLE 1-2209 - 61101- 601300 $998
STONE ROBINSON 1-2210 - 61101- 601300 $7,147
STONY POINT 1-2211 -61101-601300 $3,091
WOODBROOK 1-2212 -61101-601300 $3,932
YANCEY 1-2213 - 61101- 601300 $1,250
CALE 1-2214 - 61101- 601300 $3,028
MURRAY ELEMENTARY 1-2215 - 61101- 601300 $1 ,942
BURLEY 1-2251 - 61101- 601300 $7,959
HENLEY 1-2252 - 61101- 601300 $17,608
JOUETT 1-2253 - 61101- 601300 $10,145
WALTON 1-2254 - 61101- 601300 $565
ALBEMARLE 1-2301 - 61101- 601300 ($1,535)
WESTERN 1-2302 - 61101- 601300 $24,117
MURRAY 1-2303 - 61101- 601300 ($305)
TOTAL $124,457
SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE
1-2410 - 61101- 580000 $73,500
TOTAL REAPPROPRIATION REQUEST
$n5,057
1 0/13/92
Distributed to Board: I 0 j~j12
Agenda Item No. fiULoi:L.046
ql. \ lcL{ .&4\
#- ..... ..
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Robert W. Paskel, Division superintendent~~
RE: Request for Appropriation
October 22, 1992
At its meeting on september 14, 1992, the School Board
ac epted the following two grants:
. A $142,150.00 grant for Early Childhood Development
for Brownsville Elementary School from the State
Department of Education. This grant provides for the
development and implementation of both a fully articulated
K-3 instructional program and three support components
which appear vital for effective early childhood
education. Brownsville has been actively engaged in
building a developmentally appropriate program for young
children for more than five years. This project will
extend, expand and enrich the school's practice.
. A $28,260.00 grant from the State Department of Education
to support the Regional Adult Education Specialist
position. The Regional Adult Education Specialist will
plan and carry out Regional Staff Development activities
that include preservice and inservice training to
instructors and administrators, plan strategies for a
Regional Recruitment Plan and provide Instructional
Technical Assistance for the Adult Literacy and Basic
Education instructors in the planning district.
It is requested the Board of supervisors amend the
a propriation ordinance to receive and disburse these funds as
d'splayed on the attachment.
R \ smm
x Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
Lettie Neher
Tracy Holt
.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCBOOLS
1992-92 APPROPRIATION REQUEST
EARLY CHILDHOOD GRANT - BROWNSVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
R venue:
2 3112-24000-240502
Ecnenditures:
1 3112-60202-112100
1 3112-60202-114100
1 3112-60202-135000
1 3112-60202-152100
1~3112-60202-160300
1 3112-60202-210000
1~3112-60202-221000
1~3112-60202-231000
1~3112-60202-232000
1~3112-60202-241000
1-3112-60202-312700
1-3112-60202-350000
1-3112-60202-520301
1~3112-60202-540100
1~3112-60202-550100
1-3112-60202-580500
1-3112-60202-600100
1-3112-60202-601300
1-3112-60202-800100
Early Childhood-Brownsville
Salaries - Teacher
Salaries - Teacher Assistant
PIT Wages - Clerical
Sub/Wages - Teacher
stipends - Staff Curriculum Dev
FICA
Retirement
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Life Insurance
Professional Services - Consultants
Printing/Binding
Telephone
Lease/Rent - Equipment
Travel
Staff Development
Office Supplies
Instructional supplies
Machinery/Equipment
$142,150
$29,000
$8,000
$1,500
$7,200
$9,500
$4,300
$4,500
$1,210
$60
$230
$15,000
$300
$2,000
$10,000
$7,000
$12,850
$1,000
$12,500
S16.000
$142,150
,.
1~92-93 Appropriation Request
p~ge 2
REGIONAL ADULT EDUCATION SPECIALIST GRANT
RRvenue:
2~2000-24000-240252
Adult Ed. Spec. Grant
$28,260
E~nenditures:
1~2113-61107-111400
Salaries-other Management
$22,960
1-2113-61107-210000
FICA
$1,756
$2,577
1-2113-61107-221000
J-2113-61107-231000
-2113-61107-232000
J-2113-61107-241000
Retirement
Dental Insurance
$666
$33
Health Insurance
Life Insurance
5268
$28,260
~ - ....
V ting Delegate:
(8 pervisor)
Name
Title
Locality
AI mate Delegate:
(8 pervisor)
Name
Title
VACo 1992 Annual Meeting
Voting Crederltials Form,.
Mrs. Charlotte Y. Humphris
Supervisor, Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County
Mr. David P. Bowerman
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Locality Albemarle County
C rtified by:
(C erk of the Board)
Name
~.~~
~
Locality ~~ _ ~-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
VACo 1992 Annual Meeting
Proxy Statement
Title
lbemar le County authorizes the following person to cast its vote at the 1992
nual Meeting of the Virginia Association of Counties on November 10, 1992.
, a non-elected official of this county.
-OR-
harlotte Y. Hum hris ,a supervisor from Albemarle
County.
Uninstructed. The proxy may use hislher discretion to cast Albemarle County's votes
on any issue to come before the annual meeting.
Instructed. The proxy is limited in how he/she may cast County's votes.
T e issues on which he/she may cast those votes and how he/she should vote are:
(L st issues and instructions on the back of this form)
Nam
Title
Locality
~ Pres .dent
Kathleen K, Se .feldt
Prince William C( unty
President-Elect
Harrv c. r aniel
Chesterfi~ld C( unty
First Vice Pres 'dent
Peggy R. iley
Greens\'ille C( unty
Second Vice Pres dellt
\Villiam H.H. Bl'vins
Smyth C( unty
Secretan/- Trea. urer
E. Virgii.Samps m Jr
Scott C{ unty
Immediate Past Pres delIt
Steven A. M ;raw
Roanoke C( unt:y
Regi m 4
Marvin W. cott
Prince Edward Co nty
Marion B. """ill ams
Prince George Co nty
Regi m 5
J. Michael Oavi son
Campbell Co nty
Regi II 6
Brad C. Rosenb ger
Culpeper Co nty
Regi II 7
John D. Jen ins
Prince William Co ntI'
John M. P rter
Stafford Cm ntI'
Regi," 8
Ellen M. Boz an
Arlington Cm ntI'
Thomas M. Davi III
Fairfax Cm nty
Katherine K. Ha ley
Fairfax Co nty
Gerald W, Hvl nd
Fairfax C~ ntI'
William T Newma Jr.
Arlington Co ty
Wanda C. Wi go
Botetourt Cou ty
ReglOlI 11
Mason A. Vaughan Sr.
Pulaski COll ty
Regioll 12
James H. Gib~ on
Lee Cou ty
Executive Direc r
James D, Campbell. C E
Celleral Coun. el
C. Flippo Hic s
1(; . ;/"." C....-7
,- ..,..... /.
fC-I4- '
ft.<. , {; I
VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
1001 East Broad Street · Suite LL 20 · Richmond, Virginia 23219-1901 . (804) 788-6652 . fax (804) 788-0083
COUNTY OF AlBEMAkU.
TO:
FROM:
Chairmen, County Board of supervis~ors , .,
County Chief Administrative Officers
James D. Campbell, Executive Direct , c:-----
Voting Credentials for the Annual Business Meeting
mcuT1Vl OPfJ.
RE:
DATE:
October 8, 1992
The 1992 Annual Business Meeting of the Virginia Association of
Counties will be held on Tuesday, November 10, from 10:15 a.m. to Noon at
The Homestead in Bath County.
Article VI of the V ACo Constitution provides that each county shall
designate a representative of its board of supervisors to cast its vote(s) at the
Annual Business Meeting. However, if a member of the board of supervisors
cannot be present for this meeting, the Association's Constitution does allow for a
county to designate a non-elected official from your county or a member of a
board of supervisors from another county to cast a proxy vote(s) for your county.
For your county to be certified to vote at the Annual Business Meeting,
your annual dues must be paid in full and either a completed Voting Credentials
Form or a Proxy Statement must be submitted to V ACo prior to
November 1,1992. Alternatively, this information may be submitted to the
Credentials Committee at its meeting on Monday, November 9 at 4: 15 p.m. or to
the registration desk prior to this meeting.
REGIONAL CAUCUSES
In several regions of the state, more than one candidate has emerged to be
considered for the V ACo Board of Directors. We hope that these contests can be
decided within the region before the Nominating Committee prepares its slate for
consideration by the full membership. Accordingly, we have set aside some time
Sunday afternoon, Nov. 8th, for regional caucuses, if they are needed. If your
region would like a meeting room, please advise me ASAP.
Please call me at (804) 788-6652 if you have any questions about this
process.
JDC:bp
Attachments
cc: V ACo Board of Directors
1992 V ACo Membership Voting Credentials
Those ounties that have paid their 1992-93 annual dues to the V A Association of Counties are entitled to vote in the
Annu. Business Meeting. According to the Association's constitution, each county is entitled to at least one vote and an
additi< nal one vote per 50,000 population, or fraction thereof. Each county is shown with its 1992 provisional population
estima e, as furnished by the Center for Public Center and the corresponding number of votes to which it is entitled.
COUNTY
Accon ack
Alben:larle
Alleghlany
Ameli
Amhe st
Appon attox
Arling on
Augus a
Bath
Bedfol~
Bland
Boteto ~rt
Bruns\Yick
BuchllJ an
Buckirigham
CampUell
Carolil e
Carroll
Charle City
Charlo te
Cheste field
Clarke
Craig
Culpep~r
Cwnbe land
Dicken on
Dinwid~ie
Essex
Fairfax
Fauqui r
Hoyd
Huvan a
Frankli
Frederi k
Giles
Glouce ter
Goochl wd
Grayso
Greene
Greens ille
Halifax
Hanove
Henricc
Henry
Highlan~
Isle of ,\right
James ( ity
King an~ Queen
VOTES PO PULA TION COUNTY
1 31,703 King George
2 68,040 King William
1.00 13,176 Lancaster
1 8,787 Lee
1 28,578 Loudoun
1 12,298 Louisa
4 170,936 Lunenburg
2 54,677 Madison
I 4,799 Mathews
I 45,656 Mecklenburg
1 6,514 Middlesex
1 24,992 Montgomery
1 15,987 Nelson
1 31,333 New Kent
1 12,873 Northampton
1 47,572 Northumberland
1 19,217 Nottoway
1 26,594 Orange
1 6,282 Page
1 11,688 Patrick
5 209,274 Pittsylvania
1 12,101 Powhatan
1 4,372 Prince Edward
1 27,791 Prince George
1 7,825 Prince William
I 17,620 Pulaski
I 20,960 Rappahannock
1 8,689 Richmond
17 818,584 Roanoke
1 48,741 Rockbridge
1 12,005 Rockingham
I 12,429 Russell
1 39.549 Scott
I 45,723 Shenandoah
I 16,366 Smyth
1 30,131 Southhampton
I 14,163 Spotsylvania
I 16,278 Stafford
I 10,297 SuIT)'
I 8,853 Sussex
I 29,033 Tazewell
2 63,306 Warren
5 217,881 Washington
2 56,942 Westmoreland
I 2,635 Wise
1 25,053 Wythe
I 34,859 York
1 6,289
Page 1
VOTES POPULATION
1 13,527
I 10,913
1 10,896
1 24,496
2 86,129
1 20,325
1 11,419
1 11,949
1 8,348
1 29,241
I 8,653
2 73,913
I 12,778
1 10,445
1 13,061
1 10,524
I 14,993
1 21,421
I 21,690
1 17,473
2 55,655
1 15,328
1 17,320
1 27,394
5 215,686
1 34,496
1 6,622
1 7,273
2 79,332
1 18,350
2 57,482
1 28,667
1 23,204
1 31,636
1 32,370
1 17,550
2 57,403
2 61,236
1 6,145
1 10,248
1 45,960
1 26,142
1 45,88781 15,480
1 39,573
1 25,466
1 42,422
1 0/7/92
-'
Edward H Bal . Jr.
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX" (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
SCo!tsville
David P. Bowe man
Charlottesvlll
Charles S Marlin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y H mphns
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkms
While Hall
November 5, 1992
e Honorable John J. Purcell
airman
uisa County Board of Supervisors
ute 1, Box 509
uisa, VA 23093
ar Mr. Purcell:
At its' meeting on November 4, 1992, the Albemarle County
Bard of Supervisors supported your nomination as Region 4
r presentative on the VACo Board of Directors. For your infor-
m tion, this letter of support has been faxed to the Executive
D'rector of VACo.
CMC
c James D. Campbell
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Board
Region 4
orvin W. Scott
PrInce E ward County
B.WlllIams
<ge County
Region 7
J hn O.Jenklns
PrInce illiAm County
ohn M. Porter
fiord Coun ty
VIRGINIA ASSOOATION OF COUNTIES
1001 East Broad Street. Suite LL20. Richmond, Virginia 23219-1901 · (804) 788-6652 · fax (8C~4) 788-0083
TO:
All County Administrators and Board of SupeIVisors Chairmen
FROM:
James D. Campbell, Executive Director
Amendments to V ACo BY-La~
September 25, 1992
RE:
DATE:
By action of the V ACo Board of Directors and upon receipt of sufficient
resolutions from member counties, several amendments to the V ACo By-Laws will
be considered at the Annnal Business meeting on November 10 Ht the Home~te:td.
Issue No. 1 - Require the Immediate Past President to be an elected
supervisor from a county in good standing.
Actions ReqJIired:
Article vn, Section 2 - Delete "Excepting the office of Immediate
Past President,"
Article vn, Section 3 - Delete "Excepting the office of Immediate
Past President, however,"
Article IX, Section 3 - Delete "Excepting the office of Immediate
Past President,"
Article IX, Section 4 - Delete "Excepting the office of Immediate
Past President, however,"
Issue No. 2 - Require any officer to have seIVed at least one 2-year term
on the Board of Directors.
ActioIl B,equireQ:
Article vn, Section 2 - Add "A candidate standing for election as an
officer must have first seIVed at least one 2-year term on the
Board of Directors. "
Issue No. 3 - Limiting the term of three most recent past presidents.
Action Required:
Article IX, Section 4 - Add "Past presidents may seIVe in that
capacity only three more years after their service as
Immediate Past President."
(see back of this sheet for proper context)
ARTICLE VII
OFFICERS
Section 1. Elected Officers. The elected officers of the Virginia Association of Counties shall be a
President, a President-Elect, a First Vice-President, a Second Vice-President, a Secretary-Treasurer, and the Immediate
Past -President
Section 2. Qualification. Excepting the office of Immediate Past President, Only elected county
supervisors representing Virginia counties in good standing shall be eligible to stand for election as an officer. A
candidate standinl! for election as an officer must have first served at least one 2-year term on
the Board of Directors.
Section 3. Term. The officers of the Association shall be elected and installed at each Annual Business
Meeting for one year terms by a majority of the votes cast by the member counties present in person or by proxy.
Such officers shall assume office immediately after the close of the Annual Business Meeting at which they are
elected and installed, and shall hold office until their successors are elected and installed. Exc@pting tM offic@ of
Immediat0 Past Pr-0sicklnt, hevltlv0f, No officer shall continue to hold an Association office after formally leaving
office as an elected Virginia county supervisor.
Section 4. Re-election. Excepting the office of Secretary-Treasurer, no elected officer who has served one
full term shall be eligible for re-election to the same office.
Section 5. Vacancies. Any vacancy occurring in the offices of the Association between Annual Business
Meetings shall be fIlled by the Board of Directors. An officer so elected to fIll a vacancy shall serve the unexpired
term of the predecessor.
ARTICLE IX
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 1. Authority and Responsibility. The governing body of this Association shall be the Board of
Directors. The Board of Directors shall have supervision, control, and direction of the affairs of the Association, its
committees, and its publications; shall determine its policies or changes therein; and shall actively prosecute its
objectives.
Section 2. Composition and Election. The Board of Directors shall consist of the President, The President-
Elect, the First Vice-President, the Second Vice-President, the Secretary-Treasurer, the Immediate Past-President, the
three next most recent Virginia Association of Counties past-presidents who currently hold office as elected Virginia
county supervisors, and twenty-two members elected on a "one person - one vote" basis from compact and
contiguous Regions into which the State shall be divided for purposes of representation. The Board of Directors
shall designate one member of the Board who is not an officer to represent the Association on the Board of Directors
of the National Association of Counties.
Section 3. Qualification. Exc@IJting the offic@ of Imm@diate Past Pr-0siOOnt, Only elected county
supervisors representing Virginia counties in good standing shall be eligible to stand for election to the Board of
Directors.
Section 4. Term. Regional Directors shall be elected for two-year staggered terms with approximately fifty
percent of its members elected and installed at each Annual Business Meeting. No Regional Directors shall serve
more than four full consecutive terms. Any tenure as an officer of the Association shall not be included as any part
of the tenure of the aforementioned four consecutive terms. The Regional Directors elected and installed at the
Annual Business Meeting shall assume office immediately after the close of SLlCh meeting. Such Oi.rectars sl>..m!
hold office until their successors are elected and installed. lixcepting the office of Immediate Past PresiooAt,
hmV(lV<<, No Director shall continue to hold office after formally leaving office as an elected Virginia county
supervisor. Past oresidents may serve in that caoacitv for only three more years after their
service as Immediate Past President.
Section 5. Reapportionment. Beginning in 1991, and every ten years thereafter, regional representation on
the Board of Directors shall be reapportioned.
Section 6. Meetings. The Board of Directors shall hold quarterly regular meetings at such time and such
place as the Board may prescribe. Notice of all such meetings shall be given to the members not less than thirty
days before the meeting is held. Special meetings of the Board may be called by the President or at the request of
any three Directors elected from separate Regions of the Association.
Section 7. Quorum. At any meeting of the Board of Directors, the members present and voting shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of the business of the Association. Any such business thus transacted shall
be valid providing it is affirmatively passed by upon by a majority of those members present and voting.
Section 8. Vacancies. Any vacancy occurring on the Board of Directors between Annual Business
Meetings shall be filled by the Board until the next Annual Business Meeting. A Director so elected to fill a
vacancy shall serve the unexpired term of the predecessor.
Prcsi CIl!
Kathleen K. Se('f .1dt
Prince William Co nty
ErecutiVt! Direct r
James D. Campbell. C E
General Coun I
C. Rippo Hie
VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
1001 East Broad Street · Suite LL 20 · Richmond, Virginia 23219-1901 · (804) 788-6652 . fax (804) 788-0083
10:
Chairmen, Boards of Supervisors and County Administrators
ffiOM:
Nominations Committee, John Purcell, Chairman
DATE:
September 16, 1992
RE:
Procedures for Nominating V ACo Directors and Officers
In order to maximize every county's opportunity to participate in the election
of V ACo's officers and directors, the Nominations Committee has established the
following guidelines to prepare for the 1992 Annual Business meeting:
1) Each region is urged to caucus prior to the V ACo's Annual Meeting
(Le. before November 8th) to determine their choice of candidates for
regional director(s) and/or association officers.
2) Individual counties may send letters of support for the candidates of
their choice to the Nominations Committee or to V ACo's Executive
Director.
3) Regional caucus meetings will be scheduled for Sunday afternoon,
November 8 at The Homestead for regions 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11
(if necessary).
4) The Nominations Committee will meet Sunday afternoon, November 8 at
The Homestead to consider suggested nominations.
5) The Nominations Committee will meet Monday evening, November 9 at
The Homestead to prepare a slate of nominees.
6) Additional nominations may be made from the floor at the Annual
Business Meeting on Tuesday, November 10 at The Homestead.
Attachments:Regions Map,List of Counties by Region,List of Nominations Committee
cc: Nominations Committee
In November 1992, the Nominations Committee will need to present a slate of
nominees for the following positions:
Director from Region 2 President
Director from Region 3 President-Elect
Director from Region 3 (for one-year term) 1st Vice President
Director from Region 4 2nd Vice President
Director from Region 6 Secretary-Treasurer
Director from Region 7
Director from Region 8 (for two-year term)
Director from Region 8 (for two-year term)
Director from Region 8 (for two-year term)
Director from Region 8 (for one-year term)
Director from Region 9
Director from Region 11
Mr. Alvin Y. Bandy
Supervisor
Stafford County
167 Ferry Rd
Stafford VA 22504
#703-371-0055(w) 703-373-3027(h)
Mr. Richard W. Glover
Chairman-Board of Supervisors
Henrlco County
P. O. Box 27032
Richmond, VA 23273
#804-672-4207
Ms. Ruth H. Neal
Vice-Chairperson
Halifax County
P. O. Box 1036
Halifax, V A 24558
804-476-7696
Mr. E. Virgil Sampson Jr.
Supervisor
Scott County
P.O. Box 504
Gate City VA 24251
#703-386.6307
Nominations Committee as of 7/27/92
Mr. Jerome J. Booker
Chairman-Board of Supervisors
Fluvanna County
P. O. Box 284
Fork Union, VA 23055
#804-842-3311
Mr. Zane M. Jones
Chairman-Board of Supervisors
Craig County
Rt. 1, Box 110
New Castle, VA 24127
#703-864-6329
Ms. Janet D. Nelson
Vice-Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Alleghany County
Box 16 (Oakwood Forest)
Covington VA 24426
703/962-1241 w:962-1118
Mr. R. L Westbrook
Vice Chairman-Board of Supervisors
Sussex County
Rt. 2 Box 23
Waverly VA 23890
#804-834-2377
Ms. Ellen M. Bozman
Chairperson-Board of
Arlington County
2100 Clarendon Blvd.
Arlington VA 22201
#703-358-3130
Superviso
Suite 300 (
Mr. Thomas G. Mangrum Sr
Vice Chairman-Board of Supervi
Mathews County
Box 160
Cobbs Creek, VA 23035
#804-725-7828
Mr. John J. Purcell
Chairman-Board of Supervlsols
Louisa County
Rt. 1, Box 509
Louisa, V A 23093
#703-967-0355
Ms. Wanda C. Wingo
Chairperson-Board of Superviso
Botetourt County
2875 Oakwood Road
Troutvllle, VA 24175
#703-981-2358
,
!
.....:.:-.
v Arco Regions
Incumbents currently
in each region
Term
expires
Region 1 (1 seat) Belvin
Accomack, Essex, Gloucester, James City, King and Queen,King William,
Middlesex, Northampton, Northumberland, W estmoreland, York
[1993]
Lancaster, Mathews,
Region 2 (1 seat) Williams [1992]
Amelia, Brunswick, Dinwiddie, Greensville, Isle of Wight, Mecklenburg, Nottoway, Prince G{:orge,
Southampton, Surry, Sussex
Region 3 (3 seats) Kaechele
Warren
(vacant)
Charles City, Chesterfield, Goochland, Hanover, Henrico, New Kent, Powhatan
[1992]
[1993]
Region 4 (1 seat) Purcell [1992]
Scott [1992]
Albemarle, Appomattox, Buckingham, Charlotte, Cumberland, Fluvanna, Louisa, Lunenburg, Prince Edward
Region 5 (I seat) Curry
Wagner
Alleghany, Amherst, Augusta, Bath, Highland, Nelson, Rockbridge, Rockingham
[1993]
[1992]
Region 6 (1 seat) (vacant)
Clarke, Frederick, Greene, Madison, Orange, Page, Shenandoah, Warren
Region 7 (2 seats) Gilkey [1992]
Rosenberger [1993]
Caroline, Culpeper, Fauquier, King George, Loudoun, Rappahannock, Spotsylvania, Stafford
Region 8
(7 seats)
Bozman
Davis
Hanley
Hyland
Jenkins
Newman
(vacant)
[1992] **
[1992]
[1993]
[1993]
[1993]
[1992]
Arlington, Fairfax, Prince William
Region 9 (1 seat)
Bedford, Botetourt, Craig, Giles, Roanoke
Wingo
[1992]
Region 10 (2 seats) Davidson [1992]
Forry [1993]
Vaughan [1993]
Campbell, Floyd, Franklin, Halifax, Henry, Montgomery, Patrick, Pittsylvania, Pulaski
Region 11 (1 seat) vacant
Bland, Buchanan, Carroll, Grayson,Smyth, Tazewell, Wythe
Region 12
(1 seat)
Gibson
Mathews
[1992]
[1993]
>-N
04;"-
Z>l'1
_;>oN
N
. Z
~W<l:
o:::w-
Oo:::Z
Z 0 ;:;
4; 0:::
x....l-
w4;>
....10:::
4; W .
Z~
L...wo:::
000
Z
U04;
O"<!'X
~"<!'~
tO~
(f)
Z
o
-
(!J
w
a:
(f)
<(~
- Z
Z=>
-0
{.90
a:u.
-0
~> Z
o
-
~
-
o
o
(f)
~
\{\\\
. \^'~ . \n(
~);;; u \
w
z*oo
::
en
~
Q)
.a
E ,..-,..- Ct) ,..- ,..- ,..- C\II'- C\I
Q) ,..- ,..-,..-
~
A..
~
~
~
-,
'<'\I'
~-;.
u:
w
CIl
CIl
"-
2
2
"-
f-
c:
o
.~ ,..- C\I Ct) ~ lO <0 I'- CO 0> 0 ,..- C\I
a: ,..-,..-,..-
. ,
blSTRI~:UTi:'J {C, =,~/." "-,":!.';
1 0 5..LjCf~:...-~.---
ON __.~. "..' . \
AGENDA
1993 Le
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Update
AGENDA DATE:
November 4, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
qz .lD01.b44
ACTION:
INFORMATION:--X--
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
White
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
/2.,/
REVIEWED BY: jMN,
BACKGRO
Attache your information are three legislative documents. The first is an update on
legisla ive issues that will be coming before the General Assembly in January. Andrea Trank,
our leg'slative liaison will provide a brief summary of these issues at Wednesday's meeting
and wil be available for questions or requests.
revised copy of Albemarle's 1993 Legislative Package based on your
d suggestions at the October meeting. The first section under finances now reflects
ly specific revenue powers, such as the cigarette tax, the local option income tax,
e major proposal "to provide equal taxing power to localities."
The sec
input a
previou
under t
other change is the addition of a proposal under the section Health and Human
, to support the efforts of the Commission to Stimulate Personal Initiative to
Poverty led by Lieutenant Governor Beyer to address the manifestations of poverty
disincentives inherent in our current income assistance programs.
I
If appr ved, the proposals in our package will be presented to the legislators at the
Decembe 2nd board meeting and will serve as the action plan for our legislative liaison at
the Gen ral Assembly.
The thi d document for your information is the first draft of VACO's 1992 legislative
program, which will be reviewed and finalized at the VACO conference on November 8th. This
is the s me information you received in October, but is their cleaned-up, finalized version.
Should ou have any questions prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me or Ms.
White.
92.163
finUfd
~~t7l/ ~m"lj u~
17/' 11:>t~muh/~ ~j~.l
(.f~" 1)~ "'--<101'52/3
~/ YJf/ ?/-l-JJ.Z{}
/)
( C/7JVfnl.J:) (trJ~
"--
Albermale Board of Supervisors
Andrea Trank, Legislative Liaison
Thomas Jefferson Planning District
Legislative Update
Oct. 2 8 , ' 92
T
F om:
l~
D'llon Rule Pro osals
1. In areas where the state has granted local government
a thority, allow these authorities to be broadly construed.
2. Equalizing taxing between counties and cities in:
a) meals tax
b) cigarette tax
c) transient occupancy tax
d) admissions tax
3. Establish Uniform Government Local powers through the
codification of 15.1 of the Code of Virginia.
4. Relax the Dillon Rule in internal governmental matters
cluding:
terms of office b) number of elected officials
direct election of mayor or appointment d) scheduling of
vernment body meetings e) hiring of employees f) weed control
animal control
5. Establish a cabinet level body to come up with regional
s lutions to solid waste, parks, jails and roads.
6. Support a clarification of local and state responsibilities
7. Establ ish a task force to deal with problems of inner
c'ties.
8. Make state-approved standardized, site plans and
s ecifications available for new school construction.
ans ortation
1. Study group looking at changing the Transportation Trust
nd Formula. VACO is considering opposition to any tinkering in
e formula without addressing real shortfalls in funding. Over
t e next 20 years, needs are estimated at $52 billion in need, $28
b'llion in revenues.
ste Mana ement
1. Looking at the possibility of forming a pool for sharing
e financial assurance requirements for closing a landfill.
2. Study commission recommending ways the state could improve
rket for recyclables i.e. tax incentives, procurement
eferences, minimum content legislation, bottle bill, allowance
r glass in asphalt construction.
3. Study commission looking at ways to encourage
ivatization of solid waste management.
owth Mana ement
1. The Population and Growth Commission is considering
/
/
- . II
./I/..."C
1<t>J
Lt'"t..i.--1'":,~.1
. ,
/) , I '
(/!:.ttftf'/!"JZ'ILfj ,
.-
_"/<'(.'''-';~.1 ': .:~~.
~
\. ,.'( 'tll.
1 .
c;"",-./ ( ,"tc:0" .
J;ru'-. (~~.
,I
I' ,/" "
./ I/i-U{'; Ii... ~ ( 'P'"-; (.j
troducing legislation to establish a state wide planning office.
2. There may be more efforts by a struggling banking and
velopment community to introduce bills to restrict local
cisions on land use.
cial Services
1. The Commission studying consolidation of social services
no longer considering forced consolidation. They are looking at
sitive models from around the state. They are also recommending
ere be more funding for ADAPT (a computer program designed to
e iminate some paperwork for local social service departments).
2. The Day Care Commission regulations are on hold until a
udy commission makes recommendations. However, secretary Cullum
s recommended that parks and recreation programs be included in
e regulations and that after school programs come under the
rview of the Department of Education. The Department would then
instructed to enforce similar day care regulations. The
cretary is recommending that the regulations be phased in through
92. The cost is estimated at $5 million.
3. The Comprehensive Services Act will go in effect this year
oviding the state puts money in the budget for its
plementation.
ucation
1. A decision on this year's education equity suit is
s pposed to be rendered very shortly. Shortly afterwards the
D' spari ty Commission will be meeting to decide on what if any
I gislative action is necessary.
ime
1. Provide alternative settings for expelled students and
lly fund these students.
2. Consider some hand gun control legislation. other areas
w'th crime problems are supporting a bill that would limit hand gun
p rchases to one a month.
1. Localities are supposed to receive a portion of
cordation taxes back beginning this coming fiscal year.
2. A new source of funding could be found if the state closes
e loophole for sales tax exemptions.
3. The Jail Financing Study is coming to an end. It appears
at there will be a recommendation to go from the current system
financing in one lump sum sometime after construction is
mpleted to a reimbursement system over time beginning when the
ate signs the contract. One caveat, the state may give itself up
twenty years to complete payments.
usin
1. The check-off for housing improvement programs on the
s ate income tax form will sunset in 1993.
2. Housing Study Commission is considering repeal of
ndlords state tax credit.
3. Safe Water.... considering changing the definition of
ppblic supply to include all mobile home parks.
4. Zoning proposals under consideration would clarify respon.
o[ local govt., broader view of housing in the planning.
5. Inclusionary zoning to allow localities to assure that new
r~sidential developments will build a portion of their units as
a~fordable housing.
Albemarle County 1993 Legislative Positions
Major Legislative Positions
.
EQUAL TAXING/BORROWING POWER: To meet the increasing demand to provide serv-
ices to a growing population, Albemarle County urges the General Assembly to grant Counties
the same taxing and borrowing authority as Cities.
STATE LOTTERY FUNDS: Albemarle County supports legislation requiring that net funds
raised from the Virginia State Lottery be distributed back to localities for needed capital pro-
~ects.
STATE MANDATES: With the increasing fiscal stress on local government from declining
federal and state aid, Albemarle County strongly requests full funding of all state mandates.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT: To effectively plan for and manage the projected growth in the
next decade, Albemarle County supports enabling legislation that will allow the use of growth
management tools such as impact fees, transfer development rights and purchase development
rights.
.
.
.
Specific Legislative Proposals
Fll~ANCES
To ~xpand revenue powers by providing equal taxing power to counties.
To brovide for local flexibility of real estate tax collection, so that the long term home owners are
not driven from their primary homes due to rapid inflation, i.e. homestead exemption, circuit
breaker, refund of excessive tax based on sliding scale, classification allowing different rates for
different values of property.
To eturn a portion of the state lottery funds to localities for infrastructure needs.
To nclude computer equipment used for either administrative or research purposes in the local
ma ufacturer's Machinery & Tools tax.
To brovide enabling legislation to allow for the increase of the roll back period for land use tax
frOIp five to ten years.
* To equest enabling legislation to allow ticketing of parked vehicles for County decal violations.
To 'oppose any legislation to increase the local share offtmdingfor constitutional officers,
To tlllow local governments to determine minimum acreage requirements for land use value as-
ses: ments for agricultural, horticultural, forestal or open space real estate,
To oppose any changes to the HB 599 distribution formula which would reduce funding to
loc lities with Police Departments.
To J~rovide for the return of the recordation tax to local governments as originally adopted in
the kppropriations Act of the 1990 General Assembly,
Bold It lies, New Legislative Positloll
· Speclnc Legislation for Alhemarle COllnty
G OWTH MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING
To rovide for enabling legislation which allows for the use of growth management tools in all 10-
cal ties such as:
ppose requiring binding arbitration for teachers.
rovide funding for standards of quality.
'Ppose "Share the Ride" legislation,
'Ppose extending teacher grievance procedures,
epeal post Labor Day school opening,
To equest funds from lottery proceeds to be distributed hack to localities, including a percent-
age exclusively allocated to education,
* To equest legislation to provide incentives to school divisions from power companies and state
gov rnment when school divisions promote energy conservation by using "energyefficient
me .'lures".
· Impact fees
. Transfer development rights (TDRs)
· Purchase development rights (PDRs)
To equire recognition oflocal comprehensive plans by state agencies.
To support enabling legislation for an Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance.
ppose legislation providing vested property rights in rezonings.
ontinue support for the State Data Center Network (which includes the Virginia Employment
Co mission, the Center for Public Service, and PDCs) and appropriate funding for regional and
loc 1 analysis and growth management planning.
romote shared land use data and Geographic Information System (GIS) technology among
agencies, PDC's and localities.
rovide funding for regional environmental plans and assessments.
evelop financial incentives to promote regional planning eff0l1s, including infrastructure plan-
, construction and maintenance.
rovide for enabling legislation to eliminate land use value taxation in designated growth areas.
upport legislation which would authorize local governments to establish reasonable proce-
s and time limits for the amortization ofnon-col1forming signs,
rovide support for provisional certification for professionals or otherwise qualified individu-
o enter teaching careers,
2
dd Albemarle County to legislation that enables other county school boards to require fin-
rinting and personal information to be forwarded to the FBI for criminal history records,
STE MANAGEMENT
rovide funds for the upgrading oflandfills to legislated standards.
To rovide funding for state and federal mandated qualities of standards for solid waste and clean
wa er management.
To support legislation establishing a container deposit on bottles.
rohibit the use of non biodegradable containers whenever safe, degradable alternatives are vi-
ontinue encouraging the state to take an active role in developing markets for recyclables.
equest that the state institute incentives to encourage source reduction.
Ins itute financial incentives to work regionally on waste management solutions.
eserve all recyclables for the localities or their designated authOlities so that the waste stream
is sufficient to be marketable,
upport a shared pool for financial assurance for closing of landfills.
equest enabling legislation to allow Albemarle County to criminally prosecute property own-
or permitting the accumulation of trash on their property.
To upport the creation of a means by which legislative oversight would he provided for study-
ing the impacts offederal and state solid waste mandates on localities,
To upport low income housing initiatives by continuing state funding of the Housing Partnership
Fu d.
To llow greater local authority to require provisions for affordable housing.
PU LIC SAFETY/CORRECTIONS
To rovide adequate state facilities for state felons in order to relieve local jails.
To equest that reimbursement for jail construction projects be incremental rather than at the con-
clu ion of a project and that reimbursement for regional projects be at 50% of the construction, en-
Jar ement or renovation costs, not "up to 50 percent".
T
SPORT A TION
rovide funding for regional transportation planning and for local transportation needs.
To rovide enabling legislation for transportation districts which would allow for inclusion of
stat universities and colleges.
3
To require VDOT to consider land use impacts and local comprehensive plans before proceeding
witJh highway projects.
Tc support additional funding for secondary roads and oppose any reallocation formulas that
wojJld reduce Albemarle's transportation funding.
HI AL TH/HUMAN SERVICES
To continue state funding for indigent medical care.
To ~upport adequate funding for Community Services Boards to cover additional responsibili-
tiej mandated by Beyer Commission.
To ~upportfullfunding of the Comprehensive Services Actfor At-Risk Youth and Families and
em ure that the legislation contains a "hold harmless" funding formula,
To ~upport a budget amendment in support of ADAPT, a computerized system upgrade for local
soc 'al service departments to reduce paperwork.
AIJ~INISTRA TIVE
To 'toequest that the provision of health benefits to retirees remain optional for local govern-
me~ts,
To 'rJppose changing the current FOIA law to require the production of new computer records.
To ~upport the efforts of the Commission to Stimulate Personal Initiative to Overcome Poverty
in t'fleir efforts to address the manifestions ofpoverty and the inherent disincentives in current
inc rnlle-assistance programs,
LIl RARIES
To tJrovide full funding of state aid to public libraries.
c:\stt ff
Legi rw3.chp
4
Pres lent
Kathle~n K. Se feldt
Prince William C( unty
Presidenl- :/ect
Harrv G. D niel
Chesterfi~ld C unty
First Vice Pres ent
Peggy Kiley
Greensville C( unty
Second Vice Pres ent
William H.H. Bivins
Smyth C unly
Immediate Pas! Pres ent
Steven A. Me Jravv
Roanoke C( nty
Reiiim 7
John D. Je kins
Prince William Co nty
John \1. P Tter
Stafford Co nty
ReXi m 8
Ellen M. Boz an
Arlington Co nty
Katherine K. Ha lev
Fairfax Co nt)1
Gerald W. H V and
Fairfax C~ nty
William T. Newm n Jr.
Arlington Co nty
ReXi n 9
Charles W. C rry
Augusta Co nty
Harper R. Wa er
Bath Co nty
Reiiio 10
Girardus G. F Trv
Franklin Co nty
Wanda C. W ngo
Botetourt Co nty
Reiiio 11
Mason A. Vaugha Sr.
Pulaski Co nty
ReXiOl 12
James H. Gi son
Lee Co nty
Kenneth G. Math ws
Washington Co nty
Representative to N Co
Gerald W. Hyl nd
Fairfax C~) nty
Past Prcsid nts
Jack D. Edw rds
James City Cot nty
w.o. ray C C
Richmond Co nty
Executive Dire tor
James D. Campbell, AE
General COli scl
c:. Flippo H cks
VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
1001 East Broad Street · Suite LL 20 · Richmond, Virginia 23219,1901 · (804) 788-6652 . fax (804) 788-0083
October 21, 1992
Dear Chief County Administrative Officer:
We are sending you the first draft of V ACo's 1993 legislative program and policy statements. This is
the preliminary product of V ACo' s eight legislative steering committees, which have each met at least three
times since ApriL As one of the final steps in completing V ACo's 1993 legislative agenda, each committee
is scheduled to meet on Sunday, November 8, at the Homestead as part of the association's Annual Meeting.
The association's membership will vote on the final document on Tuesday, Nov. 10, which is the last day of
the conference.
The attached draft document is organized by steering committee. Proposed amendments or suggested
additions and deletions to any of the legislative positions or general policy statements will be considered by
V ACo's steering committees on November 8. County representatives are invited to attend these meetings
and, if they wish, to suggest changes. Here is the meeting schedule:
Sunday, Nov. 8
1-2:30 p.m......................Public Safety Steering Committee in Parlor B
Finance Steering Committee in Parlor C
Transportation Steering Committee in Parlor D
Health and Human Services Steering Committee in Parlor E
2:45-4:15 p.m................General Government Steering Committee in Parlor B
Education Steering Committee in Parlor C
Planning and Natural Resources Steering Committee in Parlor D
Community and Economic Development Steering Committee in Parlor E
Monday, Nov. 9
4:15-5:15 p.m................ Resolutions Committee in Allegheny Room
I hope you will review this document and discuss its contents with your board. Any comments or questions
you may have regarding the draft legislative program may be directed by phone or mail to Flip Hicks,
V ACo's general counseL Thank you for your consideration and review of this draft document. We look
forward to receiving your comments and hope to see you in November.
Sincerely,
William H.H. Blevins
Chainnan. V ACo Resolutions Committee
~-', "'~
~.....' ~
.J I~;T'{
. .
., ..,-"""
V ACo Board of Directors members
steering committee chairs
legislative liaisons
n(~T 0.~ l.:0l.J:?'
>....~
l::
Virginia Association of Counties
Annual process for developing legislative program
and policy statements
January-March
General Assembly in session. V ACo staff members ask counties to submit proposals to be considered by
steering committees as part of the legislative program for the next General Assembly session.
April-August
v ACo staff members receive proposals and review actions from previous session of the General Assembly,
which adjourns in late winter.
All eight of V ACo's legislative steering committees (Community and Economic Development, Education,
Finance, General Government, Health and Human Services, Planning and Natural Resources, Public Safety
and Transportation) meet at least three times to develop recommendations and identify legislative priorities.
After each committee finalizes its recommendations, they are presented to the Resolutions Committee at the
Local Government Officials' Conference in August. The Resolutions Committee consolidates the
recommendations of all steering committees and adopts priorities.
September
v ACo staff members prepare a draft report of the legislative program and policy statements, which contains
the preliminary recommendations of the steering committees that have also been approved by the Resolutions
Committee.
October
Draft report of the legislative program and policy statements is mailed to all counties. Counties are requested
to review the draft document and prepare any comments, proposed amendments or deletions. Counties are
asked to communicate their comments either by contacting V ACo or proposing them to the steering
committees, which will meet during the association's annual conference in November.
November
All eight steering committees hold their final meetings at the annual conference. Representatives from
member jurisdictions are invited to attend steering committee meetings and propose amendments on issues
that relate to each committee's policy area. Final committee recommendations, with amendments, are then
presented to the Resolutions Committee, which meets after the adjournment of all steering committee
meetings. The revised legislative program, as approved by the Resolutions Committee, is then presented to the
full association membership for a vote during the annual business meeting, which takes place during the
conference.
November-December
Preparations are made for the upcoming session of the General Assembly. The final version of the legislative
program and policy statements is mailed to members of the General Assembly. V ACo staff members and
participating county officials discuss the association's legislative agenda with General Assembly members.
Strategies are developed and implemented to pursue the association's legislative goals.
Dr. ft Version of the 1993
Le is/ative Program
of he Virginia Association
of ounties
a
rities
Infr structure Needs
v AC requests grants and loans from the state to help
local overnments improve facilities for water,
waste ater treaUDent and solid waste disposal.
Affo dable Housing
v AC supports affordable housing initiatives and the
continued funding of the Housing Partnership
Val e-Added Products
v AC supports legislation to provide adequate
fundi g for research for the development of value-
added products in natural resource based industries
locate throughout the commonwealth.
er Positions
Inte governmental Cooperation
v AC supports the establishment of state incentive
prog s to encourage regional cooperation in
planni g and providing public services including
utiliti s, transportation, educational facilities and
indus . al development programs.
Eco omic Development Highways
The t p priority of the Commonwealth Transportation
Board should be the allocation of highway funds for
the rapid completion of highways.essential to the
economic development of a region or community.
Elimination of Adult Illiteracy
The General Assembly should continue to appropriate
sufficient funds to help community colleges eliminate
adult illiteracy.
Industrial Access Roads
v ACo supports expanded flexibility for industrial
access road programs to help counties develop
industrial parks, with extension of the time for
payback and authorization to construct gravel roads
before locating an industry.
Industrial Parks
v ACo support funding in the form of grants and loans
for the development of industrial parks and the shell
building program.
Planning District Commissions
State appropriations should be increased for planning
district commissions to improve their abilities to
implement economic development programs.
Work Force Training
v ACo supports legislation to provide adequate funds
to join with private industry and local governments in
providing training and re-training to a region's work
force. The industrial training program should be fully
funded as an asset to economic development efforts.
Education
v ACo supports legislation to provide sufficient funds
to assist all localities in providing elementary,
secondary and vocational pupils with a quality
education.
Tourism
Recognizing that tourism is one of Virginia's leading
businesses, V ACo encourages the promotion of
tourism intemationally, nationally and statewide..
Interjurisdictional Revenue Sharing
v ACo supports legislation to allow revenue sharing
(without referendum requirements or charter
amendments) by participating localities of real
estate, personal property, machinery and tools and
(continuation of Community and Economic
Development)
business license taxes collected from the occupants
of jointly developed industrial parks.
Center on Rural Development
v ACo supports increased funding and maintenance of
tle'xibility in the program of the Center on Rural
Development.
Education Steering
Committee
Legislative Priorities
Equity in Education
v ACo recognizes that there are disparities in
education among school divisions in the state and
within individual divisions. The state must ensure that
students regardless of their means can obtain a
quality education. V ACo opposes efforts to address
disparity by simply redistributing existing state aid
among jurisdictions. Increased state funding should be
achieved without reduction to other funding
components of the state's public education budget or
to other state funding items affecting local
governments.
V ACo recognizes the difficult predicament of public
schools today. The success of individual students and
of school systems depends on myriad of
socioeconomic factors including parental
involvement, public safety, proper nutrition and
health care of the student and community support.
Often, public schools are expected to correct all
family, health, community and societal misfortunes.
V ACo recognizes that the primary mission of public
schools is education and supports all efforts to
provide equitable access to quality education to all
students in the commonwealth of Virginia.
State Mandates
v ACo supports that the state provide full funding to
pay for mandates, including mandated teacher pay
increases. V ACo urges state officials to recognize the
budgetary effects on local governments of additional
instruction, structural or capital improvement
requirements. The state must provide funding for the
actual cost of meeting mandated standards of quality.
In addition, V ACo supports any legislation that
improves or enhances the local jurisdiction's ability
to manage the local education system.
Standards of Quality
V ACo supports broadening the numbers of positions
and funding of the standards of quality, which will
cover mandated elementary music, art, guidance
counselors and physical education programs. It should
be noted that small rural localities are particularly
hard hit when trying to provide for these programs.
Financing School Construction
v ACo supports General Assembly legislation relative
to a school capital improvements program that takes
into consideration school construction and debt
service needs in the state. V ACo also urges the
General Assembly to consider state funding to local
school divisions for considerable capital construction
or facility renovations.
V ACo requests that the General Assembly restore the
category of capital outlay in the fiscal 1993 school
budget and subsequent school budgets. In addition,
local funds expended for capital outlay should be
credited by the state toward the county's local
expenditure effort, not toward SOQ expenditures.
Transportation of Non-Public School
Students
V ACo opposes legislation that would require local
school boards to provide transportation for non-public
school students. While the transportation service
itself would be paid for on a per-pupil basis, this
would not take into account the increased costs for
equipment, fuel, maintenance, staffing and liability
insurance.
Land Use Value Assessment Program
v ACo supports a change in the current calculation of
tlle composite index for basic school aid that
recognizes those counties that use the land use value
assessment program. Although the taxable land value
for local revenues is diminished through this program,
2
(co inuation of Education)
the f II assessed value of this land is used in the
calc lation of the composite index.
Dir ct Election of School Boards
v A 0 continues to be concerned about issues that
must be addressed on the local option of elected
sch I boards: current financing mechanisms for
educ tion, the question of bonding authority, the
abili y of local governments to raise revenues, the
reve ue mechanism that would be given to elected
sch I boards and the issue of minority representation
on ards.
Not fication of Budget Hearings
v A 0 supports amending ~22.1-92 of the Code of
Virg nia to require local school divisions to publish
noti cation of budget public hearings and requiring
sch I divisions to have copies of the proposed
budg t available during the advertised period.
G neral Policy
St tements
Hig School Dropouts
v A 0 opposes legislation that would revoke the
driv 's licenses of school dropouts.
Ma dates on School Districts
v A 0 strongly opposes actions that take away the
auth rity of local school boards and local governing
bodi to finance and manage local schools. V ACo
stron Iy supports provisions to retain and enhance the
sch I board's ability to set the school calendar,
esta ish teachers' salaries, state requirements
esta ishing eligibility for participation in atllletic
and xtracurricular activities, detennine additional
posit ons and maintain autonomy in personnel
polic es.
V A opposes legislation that would require public
sch I divisions to provide school bus transportation
for s udents attending non-public schools.
Sta dards of Quality - Full Funding
A to priority of V ACo is increased funding for
edu tion, including full funding of the state's share
of th actual costs of standards of quality and full
funding of categorical educational mandates.
Increased state funding should be achieved without
reduction to other funding components of the state's
public education budget or to other state funding
items affecting local governments.
The state should factor public school capital
improvement costs into the standards of quality and
begin to share in funding such costs.
V ACo urges the General Assembly to recognize local
governments' long-standing support of public
education. For many years local governments have
funded educational costs beyond their required share
in efforts to provide quality education.
All mandates should be accompanied by sufficient
state funding.
Standards of Quality - Calculating Cost
v ACo urges the General Assembly to study the
methodology developed by the Joint Legislative
Audit and Review Commission for calculating the
costs of the SOQ with special focus on whether the
methodology fairly reflects the actual costs of
meeting the standards. The methodology does not
take into account the differences in costs in various
regions of the state and does not adequately address
unique local conditions such as small, large,
declining or diverse student populations.
Teacher Salary Mandates
v ACo supports state funding of teacher salary
mandates. These mandates take away local officials'
ability to make appropriate budget decisions and
impose undue financial hardships on local
governments. Teacher salary mandates have created
tensions in local governments when funded at the
expense of salary increases for other local
government employees.
Binding Arbitration
v ACo opposes requiring binding arbitration for
teachers.
Literary Loan Fund
v ACo supports tllat tlle state fully restore funding to
the literary loan fund and use it for the purposes for
which it was originally intended.
3
(continuation of Education)
Positions
on Carryover Bills
Virginia Schools for the Deaf and Blind
v ACo opposes HB 584, which would charge tuition
to . localities for students attending Virginia's schools
for the deaf and blind.
Employment of School Nurses
VACo opposes HB 1049 and SB 410, which would
require local school divisions to employ registered
nurses as school nurses at a ratio of one per 1,000
students in the school division.
Other
v ACo should monitor HB 728 (free textbooks for
children in public schools) and HB 973 (student
participation in certain interscholastic activities).
Finance Steering
Committee
Priority One
State Mandates Funding
v ACo supperts the reduction of unfunded regulatory
and statutory mandates and opposes any state
mandates on local governments without sufficient
funds to cover the costs of mandated requirements.
Local governments are operating in the same
economy as the state government and thus are in no
position to absorb state cuts.
State mandated programs affected by state budget
cuts should be suspended until full state funding is
available.
Local governments need more tools to deal with lack
of funding and fiscal stress.
Local governments seek to be a partner with tlle
state.
Equal Taxing/Borrowing Authority with
Cities
v ACo supports granting counties the authority to
enact a meals tax by ordinance with no cap.
V ACo supports granting counties the authority to levy
a transient occupancy tax with no cap.
V ACo supports granting counties the authority to levy
an admissions tax.
V ACo supports legislation granting counties the same
borrowing authority as cities.
Local Government Authority
v ACo opposes any efforts to limit or cap local
governments' abilities to raise revenue. Specifically,
V ACo opposes any efforts to resUict or limit the
growth of real estate revenue, real estate assessments
or real estate tax rates.
V ACo supports Gov. L. Douglas Wilder's study of the
serious consideration of relaxing the provisions of the
Dillon rule.
Return of Recordation Tax Proceeds
v ACo supports legislation that provides for the return
of the recordation tax to local governments as
originally adopted in the Appropriations Act of the
1990 General Assembly.
Priority Two
Lottery Distribution
v ACo encourages the General Assembly to return
some portion of lottery profits to local governments as
was originally intended when the lottery was
proposed. V ACo supports legislation requiring that
beginning July 1, 1993, at least 25 percent of net
funds raised by the Virginia lottery be disUibuted to
counties and cities on the basis of school-age
population and that towns be excluded from this
distribution unless the towns are funding schools.
These funds should not reduce or supplant any funds
being currently provided to local governments by the
State.
Expanded Revenue Powers
Local governments should have the authority to
expand their revenue powers to include a local option
4
(con inuatian of Finance)
inco e tax, a local option real estate transfcr tax and
a loc I option regional gasoline tax.
loc I Option Income Tax
v AC supports enacUllent of local option income tax
auth rity for local governments based on point of
colle tion without a referendum. Such power should
not encumbered by a maintenance-of-effort
requi ement that would restrict the flexibility of
local ties to address local needs and concerns.
Re I Estate Transfer Tax
v AC supports the authorization of a local option
real state transfer tax.
Re ional Gasoline Tax
v AC supports legislation to allow a regional
gasol ne tax dedicated solely for transportation
impr vements.
Min rals Severance Tax
v AC supports legislation to allow a local option
mine als severance tax.
Exp nded Revenue Powers for the
Co monwealth of Virginia
v AC supports an additional statewide half-cent
sales tax returned to local governments based on
sch I-age population.
V AC supports a statewide cigarette tax with revenue
to be distributed to local governments based on
sch I-age population. The state could raise the state
cigar tte tax from 1.25 mills per cigarette (2.5~ per
20-ci arette pack) to 2.5 mills per cigarette (5~ per
20-ci arette pack) and distribute the increase to local
gove ments based on school-age population.
er Positions
Dist ibution of ABC Profits
v AC supports the distribution of funds to localities
accor ing to either the latest U.S. census or an annual
estim te of the population made by the Center for
Publi Service, whichever is greater.
Court Fees
v AC supports court fees as adopted by the 1990
General Assembly with rcmoval of the sunset clause
adoptcd by thc 1991 Gcncral Assembly.
land Use Taxation
v ACo supports extending the rollback for land use
taxation from 5 to 10 years.
V ACo supports authorization to allow local
governments to detennine minimum acreage
requirements for land use value assessments for
agricultural, horticultural, forestal or open space real
estate.
Revolving loan Fund
v ACo supports the concept that the state should
establish a revolving loan fund for construction of
schools, utility plants and recreational facilities.
JLARC Study of Constitutional Officers
v ACo opposes any legislation to increase the local
share of funding for constitutional officers as the
result of the JLARC study, JUR 105 or other
initiatives. V ACo should continue to monitor this
issue very closely.
Real Estate Tax Relief for the Elderly
v ACo opposes any statewide efforts to modify
existing real estate tax relief for the elderly.
HB 599 Study
v ACo opposes any changes to the HB 599
distribution fonnula that would reduce funding to
counties with police departments.
Taxation of Research and Development
Firms
v ACo supports including computer equipment used
for either administrative or research purposes in the
local manufacturer's Machinery and Tools tax.
V ACo opposes any legislative efforts that would
decrease the number or category of items currently
taxable as intangible personal property.
Proration of Personal Property Tax
v ACo supports revisions to ~58.1-3516 to allow all
counties to prorate personal property taxes.
5
(continuation of Finance)
Decal Violations
v ACo supports requesting enabling legislation to
allow ticketing of parked vehicles for county decal
violations.
Positions
on Carryover Bills
Equal Taxing Authority
v ACo supports HB 723, which would allow counties
to charge admissions taxes not to exceed the highest
rate charged by any local jurisdiction as of Ian. 1,
1992 (10 percent); to charge transient occupancy
taxes not to exceed the highest rate charged by any
local jurisdiction as of Ian. 1, 1992 (5.5 percent); to
charge cigarette taxes not to exceed the highest rate
charged by any local jurisdiction as of Jan. I, 1992
(25~ per pack); to levy a meals tax without holding a
voter referendum at the highest rate charged by any
local jurisdiction as of Jan. 1, 1992 (5.5 percent).
Cigarette Tax
v ACo supports HB 397, which would allow any
county to charge a cigarette tax of 5~ per pack.
Transient Occupancy Tax
v ACo supports HB 178, which would allow
Greensville County to charge a transient occupancy
tax of up to 4 percent.
V ACo supports HB 410, which would allow Nelson
County to charge a transient occupancy tax of 5
percent.
V ACo opposes HB 420, which would stipulate that 25
percent of proceeds from transient occupancy tax
must be spent on promotion of tourism.
Meals Tax
v ACo supports HB 1035, which would allow Augusta
and Rockingham counties to levy a meals tax without
a referendum.
Equal Borrowing Authority
v ACo supports HJR 164, which would allow counlies
to issue bonds withoul a voter referendum.
V ACo opposes SB 411 and HB 536, which would
require voter approval for any county financing
arrangement funded with future appropriations.
Lottery Return to Local Governments
v ACo supports all bills that would return lottery
proceeds to local governments including HB 88, HB
240, HB 329, HB 393, HB 406, HB 824, HB WOO,
HB 1016, HB 1143, HB 1147, SB 119 and SB 186.
V ACo will support the bills and try to get them
amended to V ACo's position, which is that beginning
July 1, 1993, at least 25 percent of the net funds
raised by the Virginia lottery be distributed to
counties and cities on the basis of school-age
population and that towns be excluded from this
distribution unless the towns are funding schools.
These funds should not reduce or supplant any funds
begin currently distributed to local governments by
Ule state.
School Impact Fees
v ACo supports 5B 340, which would allow certain
localities (the counties of Chesterfield, Loudoun,
Prince William, Henrico and Fairfax and the cities of
Chesapeake and Virginia Beach) to impose impact
fees on new residential development to fund or
recover the cost of school construction or expansion
necessitated by such development.
Delinquent Tax Collection Procedures
v ACo supports HB 589, which would allow localities
to file a memorandum of lien for delinquent taxes and
to padlock the doors of the taxpayer's business.
Taxable Real Estate
v ACo opposes HB 715, which would add a section to
Ule Code requiring counties to limit the maximum
allowable percent of annual tax increase to 5 percent,
if approved by voter referendum.
Coal Severance Tax
v ACo opposes HB 730, which would repeal the 1
percent coal and gas severance tax and replace it
WiUl a 1 percent state coal and gas mining tax.
Moneys collected from the tax are to be distributed to
lhe counties and cities based upon school-age
population; however localities with a composite
index below 0.5 will have their school-age population
figure doubled.
6
(con "nuation of Finance)
Cia sification of Tangible Personal
Pro erty
v AC opposes HB 1066, which would allow
taxpa ers to present tlle commissioner of revenue
with roof of original cost and the basis of the tax for
~~to vehicle sales and use tax shall be tlle proof of
origi al cost. The bill would remove language that
allow commissioners to follow either of two methods
when using pricing guide.
neral
G vernment
S eerin
C mmittee
Pri~rity Items
Ann xation
v AC supports legislation that would continue the
mora rium on any city annexation and city
anne ation initiated by citizens of counties.
opposes any legislation that would remove tlle
ity status to annexation of any county.
Stat Payment for Mandates
v AC supports legislation that provides tlmt a law or
regul tion requiring a county or municipality to
perfo or administer a new or expanded program or
servi e shall not be operative unless tlle state pays
the a ditional cost for the program or service.
Loc I Government Zoning Authority
v AC opposes any legislation impeding local
gover ment's ability to determine its own zoning
requi ments, such as HB 1633 from the 1991 session
whic mandates that localities provide for the
place ent of double-wide manufactured housing in
areas at are primarily rural.
Other Items
Disclosure of Governmental Affiliation
in Real Estate Transactions
v ACo opposes legislation requiring any state or local
government agent or employee when negotiating for
tlle purchase of property within the scope of his
employment to disclose his governmental affiliation.
Regional Cooperation
The General Assembly should adopt a resolution
broadening authority of the Virginia Advisory
Commission on Intergovernmental Relations to study
regional approaches in addressing challenges being
faced by local governments.
Collective Bargaining
v ACo opposes collective bargaining for public
employees.
Virginia Retirement System
v ACo requests legislation that will permit the
crediting of employee accounts retroactive to the
effective date of employment.
V ACo requests legislation allowing elected officials
to become members of the Virginia Retirement
System.
Animal Control Regulations
v ACo supports a legislative study concerning
regulating and enforcing standards of care in
commercial kennels and public animal shelters
operating in Virginia.
ABC Profits Distribution
v ACo supports distribution of ABC profits on the
basis of the latest population estimates.
Mandated Health Benefits for Retirees
v ACo opposes mandated health benefits for retirees
because this is another unfunded mandate.
Dillon Rule
v ACo strongly supports modifying the Dillon rule to
allow local governments to have flexibility in
providing for tlle health, safety and welfare of their
citizens.
7
(continuation of General Government)
Local Regulation of Bingo Permits
v ACo supports legislation that would give local
governments the authority to require any organization
obtaining a bingo permit to use a percentage, as
determined by the local government, of bingo
proceeds for the charitable purposes for which the
organization was founded.
Freedom of Information Act
v ACo opposes carryover SB 332 in its present form.
V ACo supports carryover HB 643, which adds
corporations that are totally controlled by tIle state to
the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.
E-911
v ACo supports payment of operational cost from a
special telephone tax for E-911, especially the costs
of salaries and benefits for dispatchers.
Employment of Retirees
v ACo supports prohibiting a retiree from receiving
retirement if he becomes a consultant to his former
employer within 12 months of retirement.
Handicapped Parking Signs
v ACo supports carryover HB 877, which would allow
a county, city or town to require property owners to
maintain handicapped parking signs.
Commission on Local Government
v ACo opposes carryover HB 968, which would
eliminate the Commission on Local Government.
Health and Human
Services Steering
Committee
Legislative Issues
Health and Human Services Funding
v ACo opposes the use of the Linear Weighted
Average as a statistical methodology in determining
tlle state's cost of delivering services. V ACo suggests
that in tllOSC instances where the state determines
costs by using a funding formula, actual cost figures
be used when available in making these calculations.
V ACo also supports adequate state funding for health
and human services including computerization of
intake applications, prenatal care, early intervention
programs, job training, mental health and Aid to
Dependent Children.
Consolidation of Local Social Services
Agencies
v ACo continues to oppose any mandated
consolidation of local social services agencies. V ACo
requests continued involvement in the joint
committee of the Virginia General Assembly studying
tIle feasibility of restructuring the commonwealth's
social services delivery system, noting that the study
should specifically evaluate the cost-effectiveness of
any proposed changes and their impact on local
governments and clients of the system.
Staffing for Social Services
v ACo supports a study to establish the level of
funding needed for adequate services, particularly in
staffing levels, compensation levels, compensation of
service providers, staff training, equipment and unmet
service needs.
Foster Care Payments
v ACo supports legislation to provide full funding for
all foster care and adoption service programs.
Mental Health/Mental Retardation
Funding
v ACo strongly opposes legislation to impose
additional requirements on community services
boards unless the programs are fully funded by the
state.
Health Care for the Elderly
v ACo supports legislation to continue funding of
demonstration rehabilitation projects for the elderly.
Early Intervention Program
v ACo opposes the adoption of any state guidelines
that will require localities to provide additional
services under the early intervention program.
8
(cont nuation of Health and Human Services)
Cou t-Ordered Mediation
v AC supports an amendment to S 16.1-274 of the
Code f Virginia to clarify that localities are not
ted to pay for court-ordered mediation and
supe ise visitation in matters involving custody,
vis~ta . on or support.
mission Appointments
supports legislation to amend S 16.1- 316 and
17 of the Code of Virginia to provide that the
mem rs of each participating political subdivision
be ap ointed by their respective governing bodies to
resid tial care facility commissions.
PI
N
St
C
Le islative Positions
Re eiving Preliminary
Ad ption
lative Oversight of Solid Waste
s
V AC supports the creation of a means by which
legisl tive oversight would be provided for studying
the i pacts of federal and state solid waste mandates
on 10 lities. The study should also review the
adequ cy of the Deparunent of Waste Managemem's
staff, ssible time limits in the review of
appli tions for permits for waste management
facilit es and standards for preventing the importation
of lar e quantities of solid waste without the approval
of the local governing body.
V AC supports legislation to eliminate application
fees f r waste management facility permits for local
gover ments, double liners where soil conditions do
not re uire them and new closure regulations for old
gove ment-owned and ,operated landfills.
Growth Management
v ACo requests authority for local governments to
impose impact fees, statewide conditional zoning,
transfer of development rights and adequate public
facilities provisions in zoning and subdivision
ordinances.
Manufactured Housing
v ACo opposes any further dilution of the zoning and
land use regulatory authority of local governments as
it pertains to manufactured housing.
Transfer of Development Rights
v ACo supports legislation that gives localities the
authority to enact transfer of development rights
ordinances. Such enabling legislation should not
conflict with or reduce existing land use authorities
exercised by local governments.
Comprehensive Plans
v ACo supports legislation that would require state
agencies to give consideration to local
comprehensive plans.
Hunting on Sunday
v ACo opposes any legislation that would allow
hunting on Sundays.
Amortization of Non-Conforming Signs
v ACo continues to support legislation that would
authorize local governments to establish reasonable
procedures and time periods for the amortization of
non-conforming signs.
Map Coordinate Values
v ACo supports amendments to g55-290 of the Code
of Virginia to eliminate a requirement that coordinate
values for maps based on the Virginia coordinate
system of 1983 be expressed only in meters and to
instead provide for the optional use of meters, United
States survey feet or international feet and decimals
thereof.
Deposit on Beverage Containers
v ACo supports legislation that would establish a
deposit on beverage containers.
9
(continuation of Planning and Natural
Resources)
Waste Management - Packaging
v ACo supports legislation restricting the use of
certain materials in manufacturing and packaging
that are not degradable.
Waste Management - Closure Plans
v ACo supports legislation to change the
commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Waste
Management, December 1988, Solid Waste
Regulations (VR 672-20-10) to exempt all sanitary
landfills permitted under old regulations for new
closure requirements until Jan. I, 1994.
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act -
Equivalency
v ACo requests legislation that would require the
Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Board to amend
the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Designation
and Management Regulations (VR 173-02-01) in a
manner that would allow localities to use oUler
practices than those currently required to achieve
equivalent objectives in improving water quality.
Developer Reimbursements
v ACo supports legislation that would allow all
localities to require subsequent developers to
reimburse initial developers on a pro rata basis for
off-site improvements provided by initial developers.
Land Use Value Assessments
v ACo supports authorizing local governments in the
commonwealth of Virginia to determine minimum
acreage requirements for land use value assessments
for agricultural, horticultural, forestal or open space
real estate.
County Review of Town Land Use
v ACo supports legislation that would pennit boards
of supervisors to review for cOlIunent large scale
residential developments witllin town limits.
Rollback Taxes
v ACo requests legislation allowing localities, at their
discretion, to collect rollback taxes for a period of 10
rather than five years at the time the land no longer
qualifies under the land use program.
Chesapeake Bay
v ACo supports the adoption of enabling legislation
that makes available suitable financial mechanisms
for local governments to implement programs to meet
tlle provisions of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation
Act.
Sewer Availability Fees
v ACo supports legislation that would grant counties
the authority to enact sewer and water availability
fees and mandatory water and sewer connection
powers.
Tire Tax
v ACo supports legislation removing the sunset clause
of Dec. 31, 1994, for a 50~ tax on tires.
Wetlands Board
v ACo requests legislation that would amend ~62,1-
13.5, Code of Virginia extending the current
requirement for wetlands boards to act on
applications from within 30 days after the hearings to
45 days. This will allow more time to seek and
assemble additional information that is sometimes
necessary before action is taken.
Spoil Dump Sites
v ACo supports a study by the General Assembly to
review the problem of the lack of acceptable sites in
the commonwealth for the dumping of spoil from
necessary dredging operations and to help develop or
identify such sites.
General Policy
Statements
Overview
v ACo believes that all units of government share
responsibility for protecting the environment. V ACo
recognizes that environmental problems ignore
political boundaries and therefore require the
cooperative efforts of federal, state and local
governments for correction. In promoting such
cooperative efforts, the federal and state governments
should provide localities not only with leadership but
also financial, legal and administrative support. Local
governments are willing to work as partners for a
cleaner environment, however, they cannot be
expected to assume the full costs for implementing
10
(conti uation of Planning and Natural
Reso rces)
d federal environmental mandates. While the
d federal governments should identify
enviro mental objectives for localities to meet,
V ACo strongly believes that Virginia localities
shopl be provided with increased flexibility to meet
those bjectives in the most timely, fiscally
respon ible and creative manner possible. To reduce
the du lications, complexities and costs associated
with ~ eral and state environmental regulatory
prog s, V ACo also urges that such programs be
s ined to the greatest extent possible.
greatest extent possible, federal, state and
local gencies as consumers should assume
leader hip roles in protecting Ule environment by
using ehicles that produce the least air pollution and
by pu hasing supplies and equipment Ulat are
produ ed through manufacturing processes Ulat
minim ze pollution. Thus, the federal and state
gove ments can talce a lead in stimulating markets
for 10 -emission vehicles, machinery and recycled or
reused materials.
Gro h Management
Becau e V ACo strongly believes that land use
planni g should continue to be a function
admin stered at the local level, V ACo would oppose
the cr tion of a statewide planning process that
would impose additional mandates on local
gove ments.
V ACo would support the creation of a state entity
with e authority to promote statewide planning
coordi ation. V ACo believes that statewide planning
coordi ation could produce significant benefits for
local overnments. For example, because the benefits
of gro th have not been equitably shared across the
comm nwealth, a statewide planning entity
perfo ing functions similar to those fonnerly
admin'stered by the Division of State Planning and
Comm nity Affairs could provide technical
assista ce and policy guidelines to address the
inequ ity of benefits. A repository of infonnation
placed at the state level could be a valuable resource
in assi ting local planning efforts, especially in cases
where the local government lacks adequate technical
resour es for identifying areas most suitable for
dcvelo ment.
Solid Waste Management
v ACo recognizes the critical need for programs that
serve Ule purpose of managing solid wastes in a
manner that provides maximum environmental
protection. The association also believes, however,
that the costs associated with state and federal
mandates relating to solid waste management are
placing heavy financial burdens on local
governments. V ACo urges the state to provide
financial and technical assistance to localities for
recycling, compliance with regulations governing the
construction of landfills and other solid waste
management programs. It is also imperative that the
state establish programs that will aggressively
promote the marketing and sales of recyclable
materials. V ACo also supports legislation that
encourages source reduction by industry and prohibits
certain forms of non-biodegradable packaging that
cannot be recycled. State agencies should be required
to participate in recycling programs. In addition, the
state should place greater emphasis on the
management, disposal and transportation of
hazardous materials. V ACo supports the creation of a
means by which legislative oversight would be
provided for studying the impacts of federal and state
solid waste mandates on localities and for monitoring
the performance of the department staff in
interpreting and enforcing the rules with reasonable
time frames. In the departmental review of
applications for local waste management facilities, a
120 days should be the maximum turnaround.
Local Land Use Powers
V ACo opposes any legislation that would restrict
present land use powers of local governments to
establish, modify and enforce zoning classifications.
Local governments must remain free to adopt and
enforce zoning changes that address local land use
needs, especially if infrastructure systems including
transportation are inadequate to serve increased land
use in the area
Development Costs
V ACo strongly opposes any dilution of existing local
govemment enabling authority establisbed pursuant to
S 15. 1-49 I (a) of the Code of Virginia and strongly
supports extending such authority to all counties.
V ACo also strongly supports allowing all counties to
require that developers contribute pro rata shares or
11
(continuation of Planning and Natural
Resources)
impact fees as a condition of site plan or subdivision
approval to defray the costs of off-site public
improvements necessitated by new development.
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act
V ACo supports the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act
and recognizes the responsibilities of local
governments to adopt policies consistent with its
intent. The General Assembly should consider
watershed-wide approaches toward protection of the
bay. It is also V ACo's position, however, that many
of the regulatory requirements established under the
act constitute a series of unfunded mandates that
place onerous legal administrative and financial
burdens on local governments. Therefore, V ACo urges
the state to provide legal, financial and technical
support to assist localities in meeting the act's
regulatory requirements. Both the Chesapeake Bay
Local Assistance Board and Department should
realize the practical problems involved in the
interpretation and enforcement of the regulations.
V ACo therefore believes that the Chesapeake Bay
Local Assistance Board should be open to the
periodic review and reevaluation of its regulations to
ensure that these regulations can be implemented in
an economically feasible and practicable manner. In
review of these regulations, the Chesapeake Bay
Local Assistance Board should consider and allow
for, local practices that produce equivalent results in
protecting water quality.
The Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Deparunent
and Board should reaffinn the relationship between
the state and local governments as contemplated in
the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act:
Local governments have the initiative for planning
and for implementing the provision of this chapter
and the conunonwealth shall act primarily in a
supportive role by providing oversight for local
government programs, by establishing criteria as
required by this chapter and by providing those
resources necessary to carry out and enforce the
provisions of the chapter. (Code of Virginia, Section
1O.1-2100.B.)
In addition the Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance
Deparunent and Board should acknowledge other
state and local authorities, responsibilities and
programs for protecting water quality and coordinate
- rather than duplicate or complicate - these efforts
(e.g. stonnwater management requirements).
Public Safet\!
Steering
Committee
Priority Items
Jail Funding
V ACo requests that the General Assembly provide
timely, incremental reimbursement for jail
construction projects rather than reimbursement at the
conclusion of the projects. V ACo also requests that
reimbursement for regional projects be at least 50
percent of the construction, enlargement or
renovation costs.
V ACo requests removal of the sunset clause (July I,
1992) from ~53.1-106.1 of the Code of Virginia.
Drugs
V ACo supports a state-local coordinated program for
the war on drugs and rehabilitation of drug users.
Recognizing the need to eliminate the amount of
illegal drugs and drug paraphernalia and the need for
education in jails and prisons as well as greater
coordination of drug programs and initiatives, V ACo
endorses the Virginia Crime Commission's study on
drug trafficking and encourages the adoption of
legislation to develop means and facilities to
incarcerate and rehabilitate drug offenders who may
not require maximum security jails or prison
facilities.
E-911
V ACo supports adding operational costs to the E-911
cost for which proceeds of a special telephone tax
can be used, especially the salaries and benefits of
dispatchers.
12
(cant nuatian of Public Safety)
Cor ection-Juvenile Justice Reform
v AC strongly urges the General Assembly to
establ sh a study commission to examine the
incr ing problems of juvenile offenders. V ACo
S'Ugge ts that the commission consider a wide range
of po sible alternatives including lowering the age for
trial an adult and enhancing community-based
prog s to provide a positive rehabilitative
envir nment and serve as a diversion to
instit tionalization.
Reg onal Training Academies,
Man ates and State Funding
v AC urges the state to fully fund all mandated
crimi al justice training provided through certified
acade ies.
Han gun Sales
v AC strongly encourages the Virginia General
Asse bly to adopt legislation governing handgun
sales 0 include a waiting period at the time of
purch of at least three days and not more than
seven days.
Fun s for Housing State Prisoners and
Regional Cooperation
v AC supports an increase in the per diem that the
state ow pays for housing state prisoners in local
jails d supports more funds to encourage regional
coope ation on matters relating to corrections.
Loc I Parking Regulations
v AC supports local government's right to regulate
parkin within its boundaries and on county-owned or
-lease property whether inside or outside its
boun . es.
Dist ict Court Personnel
v AC supports carryover HB 594, which provides for
additi nal personnel for any general district court
where unpaid fines and costs over seven years exceed
$1.5 illion.
Man ated Education
v AC supports carryover HB 618, which provides for
the 0 rating costs for state- and federal-mandated
education in regional jails to be added to the
operational cost of thc rcgional jail.
Volunteers in Commonwealth's
Attorney's Office
v ACo supports carryover HB 1098, which states that
the Compensation Board shall not reduce the
payments to a commonwealth's attorney's office
because he has uncompensated volunteers.
Constitutional Amendment on Criminal
Appeals
v ACo supports HJR 101, which gives the state the
right to appeal certain criminal cases and build funds
for war on crime and drugs.
Federal Funds to Fight Crime and Drugs
v ACo asks Congress not to cut appropriations for
funds to be used for grants in state and local
governments for Ule war on crime and drugs.
Transportation
Steering
Committee
Legislative Positions
Transportation Funding Formula
v ACo opposes any proposal to increase the share
paid by counties for the construction of secondary
roads unless additional sources of local funding are
provided by Ule General Assembly. V ACo does not
consider increases in local real estate or personal
property tax rates additional sources of local funding.
Impact Fees
v ACo requests legislation authorizing localities to
enact impact fces for transportation.
Subdivision Streets
v ACo supports a study by an intergovernmental task
force to address the question of flexibility in current
design standards for subdivision streets, to meet local
needs in rural areas and mixed use neo,traditional
dcvelopments.
13
(continuation of Transportation)
Gasoline Tax
v ACo supports legislation that would allow localities
to impose a gasoline tax dedicated solely to
transportation improvements. (retained from 1992
legislative program)
Transportation Highway Improvement
Districts
v ACo supports legislation that would provide general
authority to all local governments to establish
regional transportation districts Witll separate taxing
authority. (retained from 1992 legislative program)
Cost Responsibility Study
v ACo supports legislation that would increase truck
registration fees in a manner consistent with
recommendations in a vehicle cost responsibility
study being conducted under SJR 238. Buses should
not be included as vehicles subject to higher fees.
Public Hearings
VACo supports amending S33.1-70.01 of the Code to
allow counties and VOOT to combine public hearings
for six-year plans and annual budgets.
Positions
on Carryover Bills
Acquisition of Right of Way for Highway
Projects
v ACo opposes HB 855. which would require
acquisition of property needed for right of way witlIin
three years of the location of any route by tlIe
Commonwealth Transportation Board.
Federal Transportation Matching Funds
v ACo supports HB 934, which would require that
transportation revenues be set aside before making
other allocations to match all federal transportation
matching funds, including mass transit matching
funds.
Installation and Maintenance of Street
Signs in Counties
v ACo supports SB 331, which would require VDOT,
when so requested by a county governing body, to
install and maintain street name signs on state,
maintained highways in the secondary system. All
costs associated willI llle installation and
maintenance of lllese signs would be borne by VOOT.
General Policy
Statements
Overview
The Virginia Association of Counties supports the
development of a comprehensive statewide
transportation network which promotes the safe,
convenient, efficient and affordable movement of
people and goods. Such a network should be
developed in accordance with a plan which
recognizes diverse transportation needs in rural. urban
and suburban areas of the commonwealth.
Furthermore, a transportation plan should be
consistent with, and supportive of, other state
programs designed to protect the natural environment
and promote economic development.
V ACo believes that a comprehensive transportation
system should be balanced and multimodal. To the
greatest extent possible, transportation planning must
be closely coordinated and integrated with local and
regional land use planning efforts. In developing
effective regional transportation systems, V ACo
recognizes the need for cooperation among local
governments. In promoting such cooperation, V ACo
supports the provision of incentives by the federal and
state governments. V ACo also supports the creation
of federal and state incentives to promote public-
private partnerships in the development of
transportation facilities.
The Virginia Association of Counties supports the
creation of the National Intermodal Transportation
System as envisioned in the recently enacted
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act.
V ACo believes llmt tlle creation of this system should
serve as an appropriate model to influence
transportation planning at the state and local levels.
The main objective of this process should be the
development of an Intermodal Transportation System
that integrates all forms of transportation in a manner
that uses the most advanced technologies, is
economically efficient, energy efficient,
environmentally sound, promotes economic
14
(con inuation of Transportation)
deve opment and effectively and safely moves people
and oods. The system should also consider the needs
of pe pIe who are elderly, disabled or economically
disadvantaged.
S~f ty
V AC adamantly opposes any increase in the size,
leng or weight of trucks allowed to traverse federal
and s te highways. V ACo also supports legislation
that ould require the Department of Transportation
to ad pt more rigorous criteria for determining the
suita ility of certain roads for use by oversize trucks.
V AC believes that before any decisions are made by
VDO concerning the designation of such roads for
use b oversize trucks, a public hearing should be
held d funding be made available to care for roads
desig ated for use by oversize trucks.
V AC is also concerned about the growing number of
subs dard bridges, in either structure or capacity,
throu hout the commonweal Ill. As a maUer of
priori y, the General Assembly, the Commonwealth
Trans ortation Board and tlIe Department of
Trans rtation should assure the safety of bridges in
the c mrnonwealth.
Fun ing
V AC believes that the federal, state and local
gove ments all have significant roles to play in
effect vely financing an integrated transportation
syste . Furthermore, the development of the National
High ay System in Virginia (as provided under the
Inte odal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act)
shoul include not only interstates but principal
arteri Is as well.
V AC supports current studies being conducted by
Virgi ia's Department of Transportation to develop
altern tive mechanisms for obtaining and distributing
funds to support the construction and maintenance of
the c mmonwealtlI's transportation network. As such
studie are being conducted, however, V ACo
believ s it is essential for local govenunents to be
integ lIy involved, especially in the event that new
formu as and strategies for additional funding sources
or lev raging of funds, are recommended. The state
shoul identify and recommend such financing
strate ies as dcbt financing, toll roads, transportation
districts, uscr fces, public-private partnerships and
increascd taxcs.
V ACo believes it is essential that additional state
funds be allocated for construction and maintenance
of tlle commonwcalth' s transportation network. The
new funding formula (and associated funding
strategies) to be recommended as a result of the
current study of the transportation trust fund
allocation formula (under SJR 188) should address
these needs:
First, adequate funding should be provided for the
construction and maintenance of the National
Highway System in Virginia.
Second, adequate funding should be provided to meet
rural, suburban and urban needs.
Third, adequate federal and state funds should be
provided to support local and regional efforts to
improve air quality and reduce traffic congestion,
especially in metropolitan areas that are affected by
the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990. Planning
processes should be established that are consistent
willI IS TEA requirements.
V ACo also supports the recommendation contained in
tlle VDOT study published in 1991 (under authority of
SJR 121) supporting an increase in truck registration
fees based on truck weights, This increase in fees
would equitably assign costs on the basis of use and
enhance the state's ability to obtain revenues for road
maintenance.
V ACo strongly believes that localities should be
provided willI expanded legal authority to impose
impact fees and other funding mechanisms to pay for
additional local transportation facilities necessitated
by new development.
Commonwealth Transportation Board
The Commonwealth Transportation Board often
makes a number of decisions that significantly affect
local governments. Because of the importance of
many of tllese decisions, V ACo believes it is
imperative for lllC board to reform its procedures in a
manner that will facilitate increased and more
meaningful participation by local government
officials in the board's meetings and work sessions.
15
(continuation of Transportation)
The board should also consider ways to improve
communications with the Virginia Association of
Counties.
Furthermore, the board should strongly consider
procedures that will allow local government officials
to .have a greater degree of participation when
decisions are made on such locally significant
matters as speed limits, the designation of routes for
oversize trucks, roads in historic districts, the
location of traffic signals, public bikeway routes and
the required design standards for subdivision streets.
To the greatest extent possible, any decisions made
by either the Commonwealth Transportation Board or
the staff of the Virginia Department of Transportation
should be made in a manner that recognizes and is
seriously considerate of a local community's
preferences as reflected in local comprehensive
plans, zoning ordinances and subdivision ordinances.
V ACo would also be supportive of legislation that
would permit counties to accept up to 100 percent of
the cost to improve substandard roads.
It is imperative that decisions by the Commonwealth
Transportation Board or the staff of the Virginia
Department of Transportation should not be made
without recognition and serious consideration and
analysis of the fiscal effects of those decisions on
local governments. V ACo adamantly believes that no
decisions by the board or VDOT staff should go into
effect without sufficient and timely notice that will
allow local governments adequate time to make the
necessary adjustments to their budget and tax
policies.
Alternative Transportation Modes
In developing a transportation system that will
consistently serve the objectives of the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act, V ACo strongly
supports research and development of new and
improved transportation technologies. Such
technologies may include, but are not limited to
"smart highways," magnetic levitation, motor
vehicles with improved fuel efficiencies and light rail
systems.
V ACo also supports policies that will not degrade the
environment and will enhance the convenience,
efficiency, safety, affordability and cleanliness of
such alternative transportation modes as fixed-route
mass transit, special commuter bus services, ride
sharing, van pooling, high speed inteljurisdictional
rail and other services which are important elements
of an integrated and well,balanced public
transportation system.
16
"
DISTI,13UTGJ T.) ,,-,'
ON _--LD :..5:::'L'ft2::-----
'o;
County of Albemarle
AGENDA ITLE:
CIP - Ke ne Landfill Closure
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA DATE:
November 4, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
C1z ,D6\ Z .LIt"5
ACTION:
INFORMATION:~
SUBJECT
status r
project.
Landfill closure
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes (1)
STAFF C
Messrs.
Brandenburger, Ms. Higgins
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGRO
Staff i with the closure of the Keene Landfill in accordance with current
Virgini Department of Waste Management (VDWM) regulations. A revised closure plan will be
submitte to VDWM by mid-November with approval/disapproval within 90 days. If approved, it
would be bid in March, 1993 with work commencing around May, 1993 to be completed by October,
1993.
e Landfill encompasses approximately 25 acres all but four of which were inactive
the state regulations adopted on December 21, 1988. The CIP for Keene closure
projecte a cost to cap the entire landfill to these state requirements. A key issue is the
extend of the area to receive a final cap. This has tentatively been resolved pending the
provisio of documentation by the County to identify those areas of the site which have
already een satisfactorily capped from the regulatory viewpoint. Based on these inquires,
the fina closure plan being submitted to VDWM will address the capping of only the four acre
cell tha was active until the landfill stopped receiving refuse in August, 1990.
DISCUSSI N:
There h ve been significant developments in federal and state solid waste regulations in
recent m nths that provide incentives for closure of inactive landfills as soon as possible.
First, re stringent federal regulations will go into effect in October, 1993 and second,
state Ie islation in the form of House Bill 1073 postponed more stringent state provisions
regardin final cap requirements until October, 1993.
Capping only the four acres, in conjunction with less stringent capping requirements and
assuming the favorable bidding climate continues through March, 1993, the estimated closure
costs s ould be approximately $500,000. This could be higher if the bidding climate were
impacted by work associated with the state bond referenda, if approved on November 3rd.
If the c osure plan is approved in January as submitted, recommended changes to the FY 93-94
CIP will be provided to the Board prior to adopting the CIP budget.
RECOMME ATION:
None, pr vided for information.
92,164
---'~
~
I m
~
~
,.
D1STRltJU It"" T.~ ~_
, -;:::<"'I.J--l'/
ON Ii) ~__I.J;;..;;.__
County of Albemarle
AGENDA ITLE:
Volunte r Program
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA DATE:
November 4, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
Ol.L{j~B L,Lfb
ACTION:
INFORMATION:--X--
SUBJECT PROPOSAL RE UEST:
A repor on current volunteer activities in
the Co nty and the need to establish a
volunte r program.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Zimmermann
REVIEWED BY:
,..-------
I
nd:
ort is presented at the
nteer efforts within
ing the County. The
rs are currently used,
r programs may benefit
request of the Board of Supervisors and contains information
County programs and outside volunteer efforts directly
purpose of this report is to examine the ways in which
areas in which volunteers may be needed, and ways in which
the County.
- Current Use of Volunteers:
has 5 major areas which utilize volunteers extensively.
1) Volu teer Fire and Rescue - There are 204 volunteer firemen who average over 40 hours per
month 0 volunteer effort. There are also 185 rescue squad volunteers who average over 50
hours p r month of service. These volunteer efforts have been self sustaining, but the
County as recognized the need for a more centralized recruitment, retention, and training
effort, and therefore, has hired Fire/Rescue staff to oversee these necessary functions.
2) Par s and Recreation - All of the youth athletic programs are
volunte rs. More than 1,000 people are involved in youth athletics.
oversee any of these organizations as they are self-sustaining and
County 'nvolvement.
organized and run by
The County does not
operate well without.
3) Pol'ce Department - The Police Department has over 80 community watch organizations, a
Senior itizen Advisory Board, and a Police Foundation Board. It also operates an intern
program here unpaid interns, who are interested in police work, are able to participate and
contrib te to projects within the Police Department. The Police Department currently has a
"volunt er coordinator" in the form of the Community Resource Coordinator.
4) Scho Is - The schools have a decentralized system of volunteer recruitment effort. Each
school uns its own volunteer recruitment program with varying degrees of success.
General y, schools closer to the urban ring have significantly greater volunteer
partici ation than rural schools. Staff believes that this is due to a combination of higher
populat'on densities, better transportation options, and superior proximity to work
locatio Approximately 25,000 hours of service is volunteered at the schools each year.
two outside agencies contribute volunteers to the schools. The Senior Center
the Foster Grandparents program in the elementary schools and the Senior Partners
for middle and high schools. These programs, which allow senior citizens to share
their e periences and participate in the classroom, have approximately 20 participants.
partici ation can range from being a foster grandparent for an elementary class for a year
or more to giving speeches and leading discussions in high school. The Retired Seniors
Volunte r Program (RSVP), a "clearing house" for seniors who wish to volunteer their time,
provides approximately 22 volunteers for the schools. Each school provides supervision of
the seni rs in the classroom,
Volunt~ r Program
Novembe 4, 1992
Page 2
Out ide Agencies - Through outside agencies, volunteers contribute over 355,000 hours of
y services. Both the United Way and RSVP operate extensive volunteer recruitment and
services for the community. The United Way referred over 400 interested volunteers
agencies and RSVP referred over 300 interested seniors.
There a e over 110 agencies that represent a variety of interest groups. If someone is
interes ed in volunteering time to a particular cause, ranging from sexual assault to
recycli g, there are agencies that specialize in these areas and serve as a focal point of
communi y effort. These agencies provide direct services such as parent education, job
trainin, daycare, medical services, legal services, housing assistance, educational
assista ce, and many others. Many local agencies operate with funding from Albemarle County
and are contracted to provide services on behalf of the County. The services provided by the
agencie requires no County supervision.
Discuss on - Needs of the Count :
County epartments were surveyed to determine if they needed volunteers within their
departm nts. Most departments responded enthusiastically to the idea of volunteers, but the
identif'ed need was clerical in nature in all but two departments. According to both RSVP
and the United Way, two agencies that recruit and utilize volunteers extensively, good
clerica volunteers are extremely difficult to obtain and extremely difficult to motivate.
It is a so becoming increasingly difficult to get volunteers to work during the regular
working day when the County operates. However, two departments did have legitimate, non-
clerica needs which could be filled by interested and committed volunteers.
General Government
nspections Department and the Fire/Rescue Staff expressed some interest in getting
rs to help with fire safety education and fire safety inspections. It appears that
/Rescue Staff would be the most likely recruiter and trainer of such volunteers.
2) Soci 1 Services was interested in placing volunteers with some of its families as Parent
Aides a also as Big Brothers and Little Sisters. Both the Parent Aide and the Big Brother
and Little Sister program require long term commitments from trained, supervised volunteers
in orde to be effective.
From its previous experience with volunteers, Social Services believes that to effectively
train an retain these long term volunteers would require extensive and specialized one-on-
one su rvision that is not currently available at existing staff levels. Even if Social
Services were provided with volunteers, it would not have the resources to devote to training
and es cially to supervising volunteers who would be operating in delicate and difficult
social situations.
Schools
Due to t e decentralized nature of the school's volunteer recruitment programs, specific and
extensiv information on school needs is difficult to obtain. The school system believes
that it can absorb and use virtually as many volunteers as they can get, but additional
voluntee s at rural schools would be a high priority. Currently, recruitment is handled at
the indi idual school level and there seems to be little coordination with local recruitment
agencies such as the United Way, that may be able to provide willing volunteers.
Conclusi
Albemarl is extremely fortunate that outside volunteer organizations accomplish much
of what ther localities must hire volunteer coordinators to do. Many locality coordinators
act as a "clearing house" and refer volunteers to agencies or departments operating in the
voluntee 's area of interest. Both the United Way, RSVP, and the Senior Center operate as
voluntee "clearing houses" and provide local agencies with substantial numbers of interested
voluntee s.
Most loc
services
in areas
communit
service
1 agencies also conduct their own volunteer recruitment as well as provide direct
to county residents. Again, it is important to stress that volunteers tend to work
of interest in which they feel useful and needed. With over 110 agencies in the
, there are volunteer organizations that specialize in virtually every community
nterest area.
Volunte r Program
Novemb~ 4, 1992
Page 3
Also, m ny functions which larger localities operate are still effectively run by independent
volunte r and non-profit organizations. Examples of independent organizations are the youth
recreat'on league which coordinates over 100 teams in a variety of sports, the Senior Center
and Jef erson Area Board for Aging which focus on aging issues, the Charlottesville Area
Recycli g Together group that works on improving local recycling efforts, and many other
indepen ent groups that provide needed local support services.
Recomme dations
Due to the low level of need identified, the extensive volunteer recruitment resources
availab e, and the significant number of volunteer agencies that provide services, staff does
not rec mmend a centralized, volunteer coordinator at this time. The areas which have the
greates needs, fire/rescue and police, already have their own volunteer coordinators. In
the are of needed clerical volunteers, it may be possible to coordinate with local colleges
to get nterns on a regular basis to aid in addressing the clerical work backlog.
Staff's recommendation to address the three specific areas of identified need are as follows:
1) The need for a fire safety education volunteer can be addressed by the Fire/Rescue
Adminis ration. The Fire/Rescue Staff are uniquely qualified to recruit and train volunteers
in the field of fire safety. It is suggested that volunteers be coordinated with the
Inspect'ons Department to ensure that its concerns and needs are addressed.
2) Soc'al Services has an identified need for volunteers, but Social Services is unable to
utilize volunteers without additional personnel to both intensively train and intensively
supervi e volunteers in these socially, sensitive programs. Staff believes that Social
Service has more pressing needs related to its current workload, and therefore does not
recomme d a volunteer coordinator for Social Services at this time.
3) The schools currently utilize significant numbers of volunteers, but existing local
recruit ent resources could be better utilized. Staff suggests that the schools establish
closer ies with RSVP, the United Way, and the Senior Center and utilize these agencies'
extensi e experience to recruit additional volunteers. Further improvements may result from
a more 'ntensive study of the schools recruitment processes.
92.165
- ,
/1 0VvnL C~ ~ /?1 ;Z
DATE It-,
I ,
I v
7\GENDA ITEM NO. 9~, //() 0.0 <;--7
I ;'J ct
7\GENDA ITEM NAME ()
j-)h I t/ '
DEFERRED UNTIL /~j i '. _i) {(? (Ih I~-<j /~? / /7J.2/
Form. 3
7/25/86
......
)
...
..- ~t ~ ,'\ '~D J.,,\,(~__Jt..\f_J':'.1'~~,\
DISTRIBUTED T .},G"
\ 0 ~ 30 ~~..__._-_._-
ON _ ----
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA ITLE:
Albemar e County Debt Service Information
AGENDA DATE:
November 4, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
L:{Z.IIM. &:43
ACTION:
INFORMATION:--X--
projected debt
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
Mr.
White
BACKGRO
The att sheets provide information prior to Wednesday's CIP worksession on current and
project d debt service, which will hopefully assist you in making critical funding decisions
for fut re capital projects and provide you with a basis for the decisions of County
Executi e staff in reviewing and recommending FY 93-94 projects.
I
As show
sharply
The ann
current
$11 mil
service
fairly
propose
all Uk
on the first sheet, debt service as a percentage of General Fund revenues has risen
in the past four years from approximately 4.3% in 1989 to a little over 8% in 1993.
al dollar outlay for debt service has risen from approximately $2 million to the
FY 92-93 debt service of $5.2 million. With projected VPSA bonds of approximately
ion in FY 93-94, $2 million in FY 94-95 and $7 million in FY 95-96, annual debt
ill reach almost $7 million by 1995. Although the graph shows debt service holding
teadily from FY 95 to FY 98, the projection for the out-years does not include the
new high school nor do they accurately reflect the additional projects that will in
lihood be added as the funding year approaches.
The sec nd sheet shows the increasing proportion of new revenues committed to debt service
since 1990 and its impact on the remaining discretionary revenues for inflationary increases
and ong ing projects.
RECOMME ATION:
Staff i not recommending that you take any action on this information at this time. This
informa ion is provided simply to make you aware of the County's current and projected debt
service level as you consider the proposed CIP budget. We are continuing to analyze this
issue f rther and will be presenting a possible fiscal debt service policy for your
cons ide ation in the near future. If you have any questions or would like any additional
informa ion prior to Wednesday's meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me.
92.161
i
J
I
~
S96~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0
0 a) cO r-... CO 10 'V M N 0
.....
966~
L66~
966~
S66~
v66~
~66~
~66~
~66~
066~
696~
996~
L96~
996~
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a'3 0 0 0
~ ;;...8 '<t ('>l ...... 00 00 I/") r-- 0 r-- '<t ('>l 1.0 1.0
0 I/") I/") ...... ...... ~ M 0 "1: r-- I/") 0\ '<t
U ~ " C"i 'f 0\ "'t .....; 00 r-- 0 00 r...: .,,: -6 C"i
c::: 00 M ('>l ('>l ('>l ...... I
..... "C::
] ... c..
~ ~
& 0 ~
] ~
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
c::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... '<t r-- ...... 1.0 M ('>l 00 I/") 1.0 0 0\ 0 0\
c3 .. .. .. ..
r-- 0 ...... 0 r-- 0 ...... 0 '<t 0\ ('>l 00 M 8 ...... 00 1.0 ...... 0 I/") '<t ...... 00 0 r-- 0 I/") 0\
0 I/") 0\ M 0 ...... ...... ...... M '<t M I/") ...... M rot '<t 0 ...... ...... ...... I/") M 1.0 ('>l rot 00. ('>l
..... -6 .,,: .,,: v-i -6 r...: 00 00 0\ 00 00 00 .~ N 0\ ('>l. .; ('>l" 0\ 0\" orl 1/")" orl ('>l"
0 I/") M I/") I/")
~ 0 ...... I/") ...... 0 ...... '<t 0\ ('>l 0\ M M M r-- '<t
tI) 0 0 0\" ...... 0" 1.0 M,. M ...... 1.0 1.0 M r-- 0\
I N ('>l" ('>l" ('>l" .; 1/")" orl ..a 1.0" ..a 1.0"
eo I ..... ...... ('>l M
rn I ~
eo I 0
0 I
U
.~ I
I
0 I
tI) I
.g I/") 1.0 ~ 00 0\ 0 ...... ('>l M '<t I/") 1.0 r-- 00 V) 1.0 r-- 00 0\ 0 ...... ('>l M '<t I/") 1.0 r-- 00
00 00 00 00 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 00 00 00 00 00 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
0 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .- ...... ...... ...... ...... .- ...... .- ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
~
Q} Q}
Q} II) II)
ctl
II) ~ ctl
ctl Q}
~ 0 .....
c:: 0
0 Q} c::
c:: ~ II)
ctl c:
"C ctl ~
c:: .c Q}
U. C/) 0 C/)
.=
c: -> a.. 15
Q} Q} Q}
C> 0::: () 0
. D .
Sg6~
-1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,..,.
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ell') 0
0 0 0 0 o. q 0 0 0 o. 0 0 0 0 o. o.
0 ci 0 ci 0 0 ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
II) 0 II) 0 11). 0 11). 0 II) o. II) 0 II) 0 II) II)
,..: ,..: cD N Ell') Ell')
~ II) II) ..,. ..,. M M C'\I ..- ..- ........
Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell') Ell')
S66~
v66~
C66~
Z66~
~66~
066~
~
cu
~
6g6~
9g6~
Lg6~
9g6~
MOTION: Mr. Bain
SECOND: Mrs. Hwnphris
MEETING DATE: November 4, 1992
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has
convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1
requires a certification by the
Supervisors that such executive
conformity with Virginia law;
of the Code of Virginia
Albemarle County Board of
meeting was conducted in
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which t:his
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.
VOTE:
AYES: Mr. Martin, Mr. Perkins, Mr. Bain, Mr. Bowerman,
Mrs. Hwnphris and Mr. Marshall.
NAYS: None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE: None.
ABSENT DURING MEETING: None.
/'il
(/l J. {A___ ~L~
Senior Deputy Clerk, Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors /}
(/
/')
C LC-CGt ~1
Edward H. Ban, Jr.
Samuel Mill
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902,4596
(804) 296,5843 FAl< (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsvil1e
David P. Bow rman
Charlottes viii
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
November 5, 1992
M s. Diane Edgerton Miller
5 Ivy Lane
C arlottesville, VA 22901
D ar Mrs. Miller:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
1 92, you were reappointed to the Architectural Review Board with
a term to expire on November 14, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
sincerely,
()~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c Marcia Joseph
Zoning Department
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. Bin, Jr
Samuel Mill r
David P Bow rman
Charlottesvi Ie
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296,5843 FA2< (804) 972-4060
November 5, 1992
. Rudolph A. Beverly
81-1 Barracks Road
arlottesville, VA 22901
ar Mr. Beverly:
Forrest R Marshall, Jr
Scottsville
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to the Architectural Review Board with
term to expire on November 14, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity,
Sincerely,
f)~~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c Marcia Joseph
Zoning Department
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H B in, Jr
Samuel Mil er
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296,5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
SCollsville
David P. Bo erman
Charlottesv'le
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
November, 5, 1992
. Harry W. Porter, Jr.
oute 2, Box 20
eswick, VA 22947
Dear Mr. Porter:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
1992, you were reappointed to the Architectural Review Board with
a term to expire on November 14, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
V~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
B/jnh
Marcia Joseph
Zoning Department
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. B m, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FA~ (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
SCOlt5vilJe
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles 5 Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphns
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
November 5, 1992
. Burton M. Webb
elter Associates
O. Box 29
ee ~'OQ' VA 22940
~.
ar . W~LL.
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4, 1992,
u were reappointed to the BOCA Code Board of Appeals with a term
expire on August 21, 1997.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
express the Board's appreciation. for your willingness to
ntinue serving the County in this capacity.
sincerely,
O~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c Jesse Hurt, Director, Inspections
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H Bin. Jr
Samuel Mil er
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
40 I McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296,5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall, Jr
Scotlsvdle
David P Bo erman
Charlottesv.lle
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
November, 5, 1992
r. William C. Thacker
hacker Construction
614 West Rio Road
harlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Thacker:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
1992, you were reappointed to the Fire Prevention Code of Appeals
ith a term to expire on November 21, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
illingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
o~~
David P.' Bowerman
Chairman
Jesse Hurt, Director, Inspections
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. Ba n, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296,5843 FA~ (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scoltsville
David P. Bow rman
Charloflesvil e
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
November 5, 1992
. Tom Trevilian
30 Jamestown Road
ozet, VA 22932
ar Mr. Trevilian:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
1 92, you were reappointed to the Fire Prevention Code of Appeals
w'th a term to expire on November 21, 1997.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
Q::t~~n
Chairman
Jesse Hurt, Director, Inspections
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. Ba n, Jr
Samuel Mill r
David P Bow rman
CharlottesviJ e
Charlol1e Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
D B/jnh
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 2%5843 FA(< (804) 972-4060
November 5, 1992
. Mark Reisler
15 Huntington Road
arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Reisler:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4"
you were reappointed to the Jefferson Area Board on Aging
Planning District) with a term to expire on October 20,
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
tf)~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
c Gordon Walker, Executive Director
*
Printed on recycled paper
Forrest R Marshall, Jr
Scollsville
Charles S. Marlin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Edward H Ba n, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296,5843 FA2< (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
ScoltsviJle
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S. Martm
Rlvanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
November 5, 1992
. William M. Colony
20 Glenaire Drive
arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Colony:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to the Rivanna Solid Waste citizens
visory Committee with a term to expire on December 31, 1994.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman'
D Bjjnh
c F.A. Iachetta
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. B In, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
40 I Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296,5843 FA2< (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P Bow rman
Charlottesv; Ie
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlone Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
November 5, 1992
M . W. Joseph Hoeller, Jr.
1740 Goldentree Place
C arlottesville, VA 22901
At the Board of supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to the Rivanna Solid Waste citizens
visory Committee with a term to expire on December 31, 1994.
Mr. Hoeller:
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
O~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
B/jnh
F.A. Iachetta
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. Bn, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Superv,isors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FA2.< (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall, Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottes vii e
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y umphns
Jack Jouett
Walter F PerkinS
White Hall
November 5, 1992
. Hiawatha Green
8 Crestfield Court
arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Green:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to the Equalization Board with a term
expire on December 31, 1993.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
@::;~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c Bruce Woodzell, County Assessor
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. Ba; . Jr
Samuel Mille
David P. Bow rman
CharJottesvill
Charlotte Y H mphris
Jack Jouett
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
November. 11, 1992
, \. ~
"' ....--...
___ t'"j .: \
_ . I~)i i' ( k7<;. f
._..:"~'_n.___...._ __u_"-_
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scotlsville
Charles S. Martin
RI\/anna
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
. William C. Thacker
acker Cosntruction
5 Powhatan Circle
arlottesville, VA 22901
~ r" r~-"
Vn\!r.'. '
~ ~,\\~J ;] ~ i :', ;'
~ '," i".....'..
. '0LJ
Sincerely,
David P.' Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c Jesse Hurt, Director, Inspections
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to the Fire Prevention Code of Appeals
th a term to expire on November 21, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
ar Mr. Thacker:
(If"\ 1 ;.~ t
N. ,: :_~_,JL~~t! jn:lr K.
, ,
.; _.~ ',""", l;. ~
Edward H. Ba n, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. MarshalL Jr.
Scottsville
David P Bow rman
Charloftesvil e
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
November 11, 1992
;?N"..,ryI'r"".
l1*''''t
. Harry W. Porter, Jr.
vilion IX, W Lawn
arlottesville, VA 22903
ar Mr. Porter:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to the Architectural Review Board with
term to expire on November 14, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
())r:j~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c Marcia Joseph, Zoning Department
Edward H. Sa n. Jr
Samuel Mill r
David P. Bow rman
CharJottesviJ e
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Jl"'~ ~'~ '-" J"
....
i.! ,
f~ IA ,,:I....... ,~"
I. 11(" V>1,L!,',
;,iLJ_~lL_..i (...!.l.:u,..lt:iJf 'I I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902,4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
November 5, 1992
r'""::\
.. ......
I'~,.
, '
. James L. Camblos, III
mmonwealth's Attorney
o E. High street
arlottesville, VA 22902
ar Mr. Camblos:
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scotlsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to the Community Corrections Resources
ard with a term to expire on December 31, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
@qI~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c David Pastors, Executive Director
*
Printed on recycled paper
,
February 19, 1993
s. Betty Starke
P.o. Box 206
C ozet, Va 22932
ar Ms. Starke:
I am writing this letter to apologize for the error that was
de in the letter you received dated November 5, 1992 regarding
ur reappointment to the Equalization Board. Your term will
pire December 31, 1993, not December 31, 199~.
Please accept our sincere apology for this typographical
e ror.
Sincerely,
Ella W. Carey, CMC
Clerk
Bruce Woodzell, County Assessor
\
"
- ,ct....j!;il!.b~}j; i
Edward H Bin, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296,5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bo erman
Charlottes vi Ie
Charles 5 Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
November 5, 1992
M . Betty Starke
P.O. Box 206
C ozet, VA 22932
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to the Equalization Board with a term
expire on December 31, 1992.
I:>:; ],
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
ar Ms. Starke:
Sincerely,
F2~
Chairman
D B/jnh
c Bruce Woodzell, County Assessor
*
Printed on recycled paper
" ~
February 19, 1993
M . James E. Clark, Jr.
1130 Oak Hill Drive
C arlottesville, VA 22901
ar Mr. Clark:
I am writing this letter to apologize for the error that was
de in the letter you received dated November 5, 1992 regarding
ur reappointment to the Equalization Board. Your term will
pire December 31, 1993, not December 31, 199~.
Please accept our sincere apology for this typographical
e ror.
Sincerely,
Ella W. Carey, CMC
Clerk
E C/jnh
c Bruce Woodzell, County Assessor
/ \
.,....--
f"'"
"":'! 1\_ h.~ --1
.J r_. 'j .
i<)~ 1_,- :-",('
_A. ,-.(._,--,,-u.;.
Edward H Bin, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902,4596
(804) 296,5843 FA! (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. 80 rman
Charlottesvi Ie
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
November 5, 1992
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to !ge Equalization Board with a term
exp ire on December 31, 1 Q9--2".
.~., 'I () (7./;)
On behalf of the Board, I! would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
. James E. Clark, Jr.
30 Oak Hill Drive
arlottesville, VA 22901
ar Mr. Clark:
Sincerely,
C~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c Bruce Woodzell, County Assessor
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. Bin, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296,5843 FA~ (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr
Scottsville
David P Bo rman
Charlottesvi Ie
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
November 5, 1992
. James L. Camblos, III
mmonwealth's Attorney
o E. High street
arlottesville, VA 22902
ar Mr. Camblos:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 4,
92, you were reappointed to the Community Corrections Resources
ard with a term to expire on December 31, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c David Pastors, Executive Director
*
Printed on recycled paper
r I
I '
t,
Edward H Sa n, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P Bow rman
Charlottesvill
Charles S Martm
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkms
White Hall
October 5, 1992
M . Harry W. Porter, Jr.
A chitectural Review Board
R ute 2, Box 20
K swick, VA 22947
D
Mr. Porter:
Your term on the Architectural Review Board will expire on
vember 14, 1992.
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
ether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
y be prepared if necessary.
Si~.~
~ E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
L N/jnh
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
MEMORANDUM
~o' Ms. Estelle Neher, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
10m. Marcia Joseph, Design Planner W
~e: Architectural Review Board Member Reappointment
9ate: October 9, 1992
~ou will find enclosed a copy of a letter from Mr. Harry Porter concerning his reappointment.
is term expires in November, Is it possible to advertise and appoint a new member prior to
t e November expiration date?
~
.
U N
S C H
V E R S T
o 0 L 0 F
Y OF V RG N A
ARC HIT E C T U R E
October 6, 1992
Ms. Marcia Joseph, Design Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va. 22901-4596
Dear Marcia:
Thank you for your memorandum of September 17, 1992 regarding my
term expiration date. Please be advised that I do not wish to be
reappointed to the Architectural Review Board.
Ha
Dean
Edward E. Elson Professor
HWP:bc
cc: Mr. C. Timothy Lindstrom, Chair
Architectural Review Board
.-.........
.,.""
l\~Ct:,"E\)
"OC1 8 \~~
,,"\jN1"
_ .,.::. r '''-~_' \ --r
,.,. ,\ ... . tN'
1\.\ '.:\f.'to.!\,...r, ::=F'fffM -
,.....\,..._:.- - "u'" t_ t ...
_";",,1.(,, ....
20'1'11\"
ARCHITECTURE' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY' URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNINC
CAMPBELL HALL' UNIVERSITY OF VIR(;INIA ' CHARLOTTESVILLE' VIRCINIA 2290.\ . 804 924 .\715
.... 1Io
Edward H. Ba n, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
S<"ollsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvill
Charles S Martin
Rivdnna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
October 5, 1992
M . Rudolph A. Beverly
A chitectural Review Board
2 81-1 Barracks Road
C arlottesville, VA 22901
D ar Mr. Beverly:
Your term on the Architectural Review Board will expire on
N vember 14, 1992.
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
wether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
m y be prepared if necessary.
~~~~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
L N/jnh
..
October 21, 1992
lJs. Lettie E. Neher
Clerk, CMC
Eoard of County Supervisors
[ear Ms. Neher:
This letter is to inform you of my desire to seek
reappointment to the Architectural Review Board. I look
forward to working with the present Board on the design
guidelines and other matters concerning the Albemarle
County entrance corridors.
I thank the Board of Supervisors for this opportunity
tb serve.
?fjd:~~~r
c~: Marcia Joseph
I
~
Edward H Bai . Jr
Samuei Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scotlsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
October 5, 1992
. Burton M. Webb
CA Code Board of Appeals
S elter Associates
P.O. Box 29
F ee Union, Virignia 22940
Your term on the BOCA Code Board of Appeals expired on
gust 21, 1992.
ar Mr. Webb:
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
ether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
y be prepared if necessary.
Lettie E. Ne er, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
L N/jnh
Bu j'" tor', 1'1. [,IJI(:,:,I::) b
F' .. o. Dc) >: -:2J'/
I:~r.ee Urlion VA 2:2940
LE?t t, i E? E. 1\1(,::: hE~ j'"
O++ice of Board 0+ Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville VA 22901-4596
D i:::.' <:\ r' I"i~:; . I\i f.:-? hE' j'" !'
In response to your letter dated October 5, I would be
pleased to be appointed to another term on the BOCA Code
Board 0+ Appeals.
S :1. r"le i!::!tQtb'" (::.' I \/..
0l-1M A , · ....
VJVl
I3u j'" tor", 'vi.. [,\Je b 1:1
. .
Edward H Bain, Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Char]otlesvill
Charles S Martin
Rlvanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
October 5, 1992
M . William C. Thacker
F"re Prevention Code of Appeals Board
Tacker Construction
6 4 West Rio Road
C arlottesville, VA 22901
D ar Mr. Thacker:
Your term on the Fire Prevention Code of Appeals Board
e pired November 21, 1991.
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
ether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
y be prepared if necessary.
:~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
L N/jnh
. .'
"
THACKER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
P.O. BOX 1158 ' CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
Telephone 804/295,2102
October 20, 1992
Coun~y of Albemarle
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcln~ire Road
Charlo~~esville, Virqinia 22902-4596
A~~en~ion: Miss Le~~ie E, Neher, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
Dear Miss Neher:
I am in receipt of your letter of October 5. 1992 concerning
~he expiration of my term on the Fire Prevention Code of
Appeals Board,
I would very much like to be considered for reappointment ~o
~his board by the Board of Supervisors.
~~J-
William C. Thacker, Jr.
Edward H. Ban. Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scoflsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvill
Charles S Martm
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphfls
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkms
White Hall
October 5, 1992
M . Tom Trevillian
F're Prevention Code of Appeals Board
5 30 Jamestown Road
C arlottesville, VA 22901
ar Mr. Trevillian:
Your term on the Fire Prevention Code of Appeals Board will
pire on November 21, 1992.
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
ether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
y be prepared if necessary.
>>fi;t;
Lett1e E. Ne er, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
L jjnh
,
.
Edward H. Bai , Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forresl R Marshall. Jr
Scollsville
Charles S. Martm
Rivdnna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
October 5, 1992
M . William M. Colony
R'vanna Solid Waste Citizens Advisory
Committee Board
3520 Glenaire Drive
C arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Colony:
term on the Rivanna Solid Waste Citizens Advisory
Board will expire on December 31, 1992.
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
hether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
ay be prepared if necessary.
SinCerelY'~~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
EN/jnh
I
Edward H. Bai , Jr.
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296,5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
October 5, 1992
M . William M. Colony
ivanna Solid Waste Citizens Advisory
Committee Board
3520 Glenaire Drive
C arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Colony:
Your term on the Rivanna Solid Waste Citizens Advisory
ommittee Board will expire on December 31, 1992.
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
hether reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
ay be prepared if necessary.
SinCerelY~~
~Neher, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
EN/jnh
'. iD
K
~~
"vfJ ~
\j ,~
\ \ Y
C'. J
~~
/\y~ .
,u
"\ (;
D\'
!LY
t\ U \
\ \...
'to
\
w',
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
401 MciNTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901-4596
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Members of the Board of superviso~~
Lettie E. Neher. Clerk. CMC
November 4. 1992
Appointments to Various Boards/Co issions/Committees
(Note: This is an update to the list furnished to the Board members on
October 1. 1992. An advertisement for vacancies was not placed since the Board
was working on a new appointment policy, Letters were forwarded from the
Cler 's Office asking if appointees wanted to be reappointed. and not everyone
has replied.)
JOI AIRPORT COMMISSION: The term of John C. Lowry expires on December 1,
1992. Mr. Lowry is not eligible for reappointment, This vacancy viII be
advertised.
ARC ITECTURAL REVI BOARD: The term of Diane Edgerton Miller expires on
November 14. 19 Mrs. Miller has served only since February. and has
requested reappointment (see letter attached).
The term of Rudolph A, Beverly expires on November 14. 1992. Mr, Beverly
has served only since June. He wishes to be reppointed.
The term of Harry W. Porter. Jr, expires on November 14. 1992. Mr. Porter
has served two years. He does not wish to be reappointed to a full term.
but is willing to continue serving while the ARB works on the guidelines.
BOCA CODE BOARD OF PEALS: The term of Burton M, Webb expired on August 21.
1992, Mr, Webb ~ad served only two years, Terms are normally for five
years, Kr. Webb would be pleased to serve another term.
MMISSION: The term of Blanche R, Steppe expires on
November 14. 199" The term of Elly Tucker expires on November 14. 1992.
This item is on the consent agenda for November 4. for a change in
appointment dates,
CO ITY CORRECTIONS RES URCES BOARD: The term of James L. Camblos. III will
I expire on December 31 1992. He may be reappointed.
~ITY SERVICES BOARD (REGION 10): The term of Dr. W. D. Buxton expired on
I June 30. 1992. He is not eligible for reappointment, This vacancy was
advertised without success in July. so will be advertised again.
I
I
.. "
,
Memol to: Board of Supervisors
Dat~: October 1, 1992
Pagel 2,
I
E U IZATION BOARD: The terms of all members expire on December 31, 1992.
Serving at present are: Ivar Mawyer (Samuel Miller); Hiawatha Green
(Rivanna); Betty Starke (White Hall); James E, Clark, Jr. (Scottsville):
I Edward H. Deets, Jr. (Jack Jouett).
According to the Board's agreement, in 1993 there will be a representative
from the Charlottesville District, but no representative from Jack Jouett.
FIRE PREVENT N CODE BOARD OF APPEALS: The term of William C. Thacker expired
November 1, 1991. He is eligible for reappointment, and is willing to
continue serving.
The term of Tom Trevillian expires on November 21, 1992. Be is willing to
serving.
THO S JEFFERSON HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS CORPORATION: The term of Frances J.
Lee-Vandell expires on December 31, 1992, She has not replied to our
I inquiry.
I
I
PUBL C RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY: The term of C, Timothy Lindstrom
expires on December 13, 1992, The term of Scott B. Peyton expires on
December 13, 1992, Neither has replied to our inquiry.
JEFF RSON AREA BOARD ON AGING: The term of Mark Reisler expires on October 20,
1992. He is el~gible for reappointment and has expressed a desire to be
. d "
reappo1nte .
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: The term of Thomas F. Stephens expired on
August 13, 1992. The term of D. James Firster expired on August 13, 1992.
Neither person has answered our inquiry.
P
ING COMMISSION: The term of Harry W, Porter, Jr. as the University of
Virginia Non-voting member expires on December 31, 1992,
The term of Raymond Reiss expires on December 13, 1992, Be does not wish
reappointed.
\
..
RIVA A SOLID WASTE . ITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE: The term of William M. Colony
I expires on Decem r 31, 1992, The term of W, Joseph Hoeller, Jr. expires
on December 31, 1 2. Both wish to be reappointed.
BO OF SOCIAL SERVICES: The term of Theodore N. Gardner expires on
December 31, 1992. Mr, Gardner is not eligible to be reappointed. He
serves the SCOTTSVILLE DISTRICT,
I
I
I The term of Mrs. Earl H. (Doris) Davis expires on December 31, 1992, Mrs,
Davis is not eligible to be reappointed. Mrs, Davis serves the WHITE HALL
DISTRICT,
I According to the Board's new policy, both vacancies will be advertised.
I
I
LEN:rS
I
I
I
,
,