Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-08-14 ACTIONS Board of Supervisors Meeting of August 14, 2002 August 15, 2002 AGENDA ITEM/ACTION Call to Order. · Meeting was called to order 6:00 p.m., by the Chairman, Ms. Thomas. All BOS members were present. Aisc present were Bob Tucker, Larry Davis, Ella Carey and Wayne Cilimberg. ASSIGNMENT 4. From the Public: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda. · Elizabeth Petofi spoke to the Board regarding the Preddy Creek property and road access. 5.1 Clerk: Forward Extract from Minutes to VDOT with copy to ,Juan Wade. FY 2002/03 through FY 2007/08 Secondary System Construction Program. · APPROVED changes to the revised FY 2002/03 through FY 2007/08 Secondary Construction Program as recommended by staff. 10. SP-2002-010. Riverbend Associates LLC (Signs #60&61 ). SP-2002-011. Riverbend Associates LLC (Signs #62&63) · APPROVED SP-2002-010 and SP-2002-011 subject to four conditions. · REQUESTED the Planning Commission to reconsider SDP-2002-022, Pavillion at Riverbend. SP-2002-026. Guaranty Bank ATM Lane (Signs #97&98). · APPROVED SP-2002-026 as recommended by Planning Commission. SP-2002-027. Kia Automobile Dealership (Sign #40). · APPROVED SP-2002-027 as recommended by Planning Commission. Adoption of Resolution approving the filing of an application to the Virginia Public School Authority. · ADOPTED the attached Resolution. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on The Agenda. · CONSENSUS of Board to begin the September 11, 2002 meeting at 7:00 p.m. · Sally Thomas: o Provided Board members with information on a trip, being planned by City official, to Burlington Vermont on October 15. Let Mr. Tucker know by Thursday, August 15 if any Board members would like to attend. o Mentioned the recent successful program held for ACE. o Mentioned an upcoming meeting of a small group of members from the High Growth Coalition and others to discuss smart growth. Albemarle County will be making a presentation. · Charles Martin: o Recently met with representatives from Gordonsville. He thinks their proposal is something we can support. He will next meet with ,John Moore to see if their group can agree and move forward. 26 Clerk: Clerk: Clerk: Clerk: 27 Adjourn. Set out conditions of approval below. (Attachment 1 ) Set out conditions of approval below. (Attachment 1 ) Set out conditions of approval below. (Attachment 1 ) Forward signed resolution to Brenda Neitz. -1- [ · At 7:28 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. J J /ewc Attachment 1 - Planning items conditions of approval -2- Attachment I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agenda item No. 6. SP-2002-10. Riverbend Associates LLC (Si.qns #60&61). Public hearing on a request to allow vehicle rental & maintenance facility. TM78,P17A, contains 20.602 acs (8.828 ac of which are subject to this permit). Znd C-1 and w/in an EC. Loc on Newhouse Dr just off Rt 250 by the Rivanna River. Rivanna Dist. Agenda Item No. 7. SP-2002-11. Riverbend Associates LLC (Si.qns #62&63). Public hearing on a request to allow outdoor storage & display of motor vehicles. TM78,P17A, contains 20.602 acs ($.$25 ac of which are subject to this permit). Znd C-1 and w/in EC. Loc on Newhouse Dr just off Rt 250 by the Rivanna River. Rivanna Dist. APPROVED SP-2002-10 and SP-2002-11 subject to the following conditions: 1. Vehicles shall not be elevated; 2. Vehicles shall be stored/displayed only in the areas indicated on the approved site plan; 3. The use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is approved by the Architectural Review Board, including landscape and lighting site plans; and 4. Provide vegetative screening in the area north and west of the biofilter, west of the dumpster, and west of the parking area to help screen the view from the road, river and greenway. An informal grouping of native screening trees and shrubs is appropriate. Agenda Item No. $. SP-2002-026. Guaranty Bank ATM Lane (Si,qns #97& 98). Public hearing on a request to allow drive-thru ATM lane onto existing bank. TM61 ,P123F, contains 0.$39 acs. Znd HC. Loc at intersec of Rt 631 (Rio Rd) & Rt 29 (Seminole Trail). Rio Dist. APPROVED SP-2002-026 subject to the following conditions: 1. The permittee shall continue to provide one-way circulation with an unobstructed bypass lane that allows the safe passage of vehicles that do not enter the drive-though lanes; 2. The use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the Architectural Review Board, including landscape and lighting plans; 3. One crape myrtle tree shall be added on the Rio Road side of the site to extend the existing row westward; 4. Shrubs shall be added along the frontage of Rio Road to match the existing plantings along Route 29; and 5. The portion of the existing vertical wall element that extends above the canopy shall be eliminated. Agenda Item No. 9. SP-2002-027. Kia Automobile Dealership (Si.qn #40). Public hearing on a request to allow outdoor storage & display accessory to auto dealership. Incl 2,730 sq ft add'n to existing 5,549 sq ft bldg & expansion of parking lot. Portion of TM7$,P9, contains approx 1.7 acs. Znd HC & EC. Loc on Rt 250 (Richmond Rd), approx 1/3 mi E of intersec w/Rt 20 (Stoney Point Rd). Rivanna Dist. APPROVED SP-2002-027 subject to the following conditions: 1. Vehicles shall not be elevated; 2. Vehicles shall be displayed only in the areas indicated for display as shown on the site plan; 3. The use shall not commence prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Architectural Review Board. This shall include approval of landscaping and lighting plans; 4. In addition to the landscaping required by condition three, the applicant shall provide trees along the interior drive forty feet (40') on center, two and one-half inch (2 %") caliper, at the bottom of the slope. Provide a mix of screening trees, screening shrubs, and ornamental trees throughout the slopes to soften its appearance; 5. The open rip-rap channel shall be changed to a sub-surface pipe to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department; and -3- 6. The storm water BMP facility will be designed as a recreational amenity compatible with the adjacent residential development. -4- PLEASE SIGN BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA FROM THE PUBLIC FOR AUGUST 14, 2002 NAME (Please print clearly),, . 2 3 4 6 '7 " 9 10 .... PHONE NUMBER/ADDRI~SS~. .~ . ............... Eo. t~.~:,,/ Elizabeth F. Pet6fi P.O. Box 586 RuckerSville, VA 22968-0586 (434) 960-1464 arvonl04~cs.com August 6, 2002 To the Boards of Supervisors of Albemarle, Orange, and Greene Counties: At the July 3rd, 2002 meeting of the Albemarle CountY'Board of Supervisors, Mr.'Perkins stated he had read a news story in the Daily Progress~ about a $3 million grant for a regional park. It was requested that Albemarle stafflook into the matter with respect to the Preddy Creek property and report back to the Board. The thought of three million dollars is quite delicious for any reason, but especially if it could be invested in a regional park in the tri-county area that is fast being overwhelmed by new and expanding subdivisions in all three counties, the Fried Development at Rts. 29 and 607 in Greene, and the nearby burgeoning "Spy Shop" and UVa Research Park in Albemarle, among others. However, why look for $3 million from a far-away agency at some far-distant time when.the Park is already developed and has been operated for years by enterprising members of America's famous Underground Economy?. Besides Albemarle Countfs 568~acre'property, there are closer to 1,000 acres of wonderfully wooded land with trails already built and used daily by dozens if not hundreds of ATV and'horseback riders, trails which stretch fi:om Bumley Station Road in Albemarle to Bumley Road in Orange, and from Willy Miser Lane in-Orange through Anna Robertson's land in Greene in some places almost all the way to Sheetz gas station at Routes 29 and 607. Greene County recently went through a permit application process with the Crawfords of Bacon Hollow which you may have read about 'in the newspapers. These Crawfords have for years operated a famous motocross course where people Come from miles around' to ride for only $10 a day. Many persons who visited the Crawford track enthusiastically splurged overS7,000 on an ATV which they are now riding on the-Preddy Creek and adjoining properties. From the aspect of ATV's alone, if the now-existing ATV Preddy Creek Park were officially opened to the public, there would be a lot of clinking of cash registers for the three counties from the huge sales tax income from the sale of dozens more ATV's! The Preddy Creek property, as shown in its chain of title, has a 12 foot road (named for 911 purposes "Atto Road") fromthe foot of Willy Miser Lane (Rt. 613) all the way over to Burnley Road. As shown on the tax maps of Albemarle and Orange Counties, it l~)oks like a super highway, but there's not much in the court records about this road. Certain persons took -advantage of this fact to, first chase people offthe road at gun point, then erect a bogus sign (without a permit) that it was "Not a public access road" (which it really was.) Then a gate was' put up and Albemarle staff, instead of behaving consistent with the Ritter matter, actually not only agreed to the gate but also to the gate being locked and legitimate landowners kept from accessing their land starting with me. Some landowners laid low while all this was going on, but the day after this past Memorial Day, Michael Riner, a property owner and contractor whose only access is Arto Road, came in with chain saws and a bull dozer, widened the road to about 20 feet and even laid gravel. Since Albemarle never surveyed the road, there's no benchmark to measure against. I purchased my land in July 1992. I enclose an estimate I got from McWilliams that September to improve the road as it was then. Each year I travel on the road several times to preserve my legal right to use it. I have observed OVer the years that portions of the road have been moved, presumably by the Oehmkes who were trying to get the entire road on their property so they could control it. I paid for a survey and set the survey to record in both Orange and Albemarle in 1998. Enclosed I have added some other surveys and information with reference to this road because I noticed that in the Minutes of the November 5, 1995 Meeting of the Board of Supervisors the staff report stated that there was a road to the Preddy Creek property in Orange County, but no mention was made of the fact that the road actually goes over. the property. In addition to the fact that neither the Riners nor I, in our competing chains of title' (which uses the same wording in the deed) have a deeded right of way, the Riner chain of title does show a way from 607 down an old road that James McWilliams laid his driveway over. Since McWilliams and his large family have made many ATV roads and trails over what is now my land (shown in the survey as Butner), the actual road was never abandoned, so if the Park-were to be opened to the public, or a contractor bought the Riner/Pet6fi tract and Albemarle County did not want the road Widened to 50 feet, perhaps that should be the desig~ted' access for the 68 ac~s? In any case, you should be forewarned that this Riner property, on which I have a competing chain of title, is presently listed for sale -- for the benefit of the Riners ' by Century 21 Manley Associates as their #340024, "with subdivision rights." Attached are some of their recent ads for you to read. There is more information on their web site: It would be a terrible shame if some contractor snapped up this property (which as you may see by the enclosed plat is bracketed in Albemarle by the Preddy Creek property) and popped in a subdivision while Albemarle was waiting to hear the report about the $3 million. Therefore, by this letter, I implore each and every one of you, each individual member of the Board of Supervisors of the three involved counties, to jump into your cars (or get Pat Mullaney to chauffeur you) to drive down this nice new gravel road over the Preddy Creek property to see what a fine, beautiful park this could be, and what lovely roads and trails (and even bridges) already, exist, ready to be used by the Public and not just the Crawfords, Oehmkes, and McWilliamses. Because the possibilities of the beautiful watershed Preddy Creek property have been on the back burner for the over 30 years since Albemarle County bought the land from Charlie Hurt, I am enclosing a pot pourri of documents for your information. 2 These include a compiled survey plat showing Albemarle's survey of the 568-acre Preddy Creek property which lies in the three counties and in Greene adjoins Mrs. Robertson's land which Greene County wanted to use as a sewage treatment plant for the Fried development. This compiled plat was made at Mint Printing, accurately reduced and matched to scale, comprising the two plats Albemarle had done of its property, plus a plat of my property. I also enclose a full- size copy of my own plat. In particular, these plats shoTM my access to my land, part of which access is the road which lies across the outer edge ofAlbemarle's Preddy Creek property in Orange, which 12-foot access.is shown in Albemarle's chains of title as filed in the Circuit Courts in both Albemarle and Orange Counties but which was not indicated on. their survey plat when it was done. This is the road recently improved by the Riners which I invite you to drive on to inspect the Preddy Creek property and its profitable possibilities. I also enclose a two-page report to Albemarle's Board of Supervisors given years ago which is very current as it is talking about a drought and exhorting action, Minutes from the Orange County Planning Commission meetings in 1985 and 1987 when they effectively closed an access from Burnley Road without implementing the planned relocation of th~ road. This relocation ought to be implemented before the 20 years is up or it will be lost, right at a time when it would be needed because of the tem~ble traffic on 33. Because certain persons have for years been attempting to deny me access to my 23.88 acres by my original, actual access, I enclose a copy of a news story about the situation where Albemarle County took the Ritters to court because (in just the converse of the problem I have had), they put a gate up and tried to block an old road. Fred Payne, accordin~to the case file in the Ritter matter, charged the Ritters about $25,000 and lost the case, so Albemarle is'acting in an inconsistent manner by putting gates up and trying to keep people from enjoying the Preddy Creek property, which, in fact, only keeps the law-abiding citizens away. Other kems are self-evident. In short, before any more nearby or adjoining properties are turned into subdivisions, and before any more private propert~ owners lay their driveways down ove£~mbtic roadways and put gates up or get out their guns, I believe that Mr. Perkins' suggestion should be acted on and the Preddy Creek property, with or without the $3 million benefit, should be opened to the use of the taxpayers as an akeady developed horse and ATV park. I also believe that, in a spirit of fairness and decency and good-will, that the matter of the access shown on the tax maps and in the deed bookS (or not shown) should be resolved once and for all, clearly and openly for the Riner/Pet6fi and the 23.88-acre Pet6fi property, and that Albemarle should set a consistent policy with regard to access roads - either prevent them from being closed as they did with the Ritters, or allow them to be closed but to make and implement a fair substitute when they are closed, as Orange County meant to do and I hope will, now they've been reminded. To that end, I herewith make a formal offer: as you may see on looking at my plat, the ,original" road which goes across Albemarle County's Preddy Creek property and Which, in the deeds, is only 12 feet wide, could be "closed" (as was the case in Orange with the S-B Road at the other end of this road), but a new, wider (50 feet for modem requirements) road could be mn parallel over the adjoining property of which I am a part-owner. This in some areas would only require moving the road about 40 feet (to give 20 feet off?the line to each side.) That way the Preddy Creek property and the Oehmkes could have the old 12 foot road, but at the same time, whoever ends up with the now Riner/Pet6fi 68+ acres plus the lower access to my 23.88 acre parcel (which needs the lower access because of a creek) could have a larger, safer road which fire trucks and emergency vehicles could travel on. Or maybe the entire road could be relocated to the boundary line because with all the drought, there is high danger of fire and there really should be a wider road to protect all the properties.~ This might sound like gobbledegook, if you are sitting in a building reading this, but if you would only get out on the land you could understand at once what I am trying to convey. According to what I read on the VDOT site on the InterNet,~moving a road is in the bailiwick of the Board of Supervisors. -While such niceties do not fret the Oehmkes, Crawfords, or McWilliamses in their own economy, where they just do what they want and get away with it, it has been a real hindrance in communication about these matters for a law-abiding citizen like me over the years. The road I am talking about (the 12-foot road shown in the Court records) is in Orange, within the territory of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, but it runs over land (in Orange) belonging to the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County and accesses properties lying in both Orange and Albemarle, so even though it is easily dealt with on the physical plane with Chain-saws, bulldozers, and four-wheelers, it's a rather daunting ta~s~,within the bureaucracy: .But whatever is done, decisions should be made by the Boards of Supervisors for the good of the whole and not by guns, gates, grading, and gravel for the good.of the greedy. Again, I would invite all the members of each of the Boards of'Supervisors to drive down the nice new gravel road the Riners fixed up - which goes over Albemarle's land - so you can see what a lovely park it could be, and how much the ATV riders have been using the trails, woodland, and creek. You can walk or ride for.miles in any direction, including onto my property with my welcome. Please come and see. The ATV riders have made nice bridges, so you can even cross the creek in several places. The Preddy Creek property would be perfect for a regional park. Please make it a proper park NOW! Thank you in advance for taking a new look at the Preddy Creek Park, and I hope you save the 70 acres from the contractors! Sincerely, Elizabeth F. Pet6fi Attachments enclosed!. 4 July 11 - July 17, 2002 ,~ 70 ACRES IN onveniently located residential parcel consisting of 38.83 acres in Orange and 30.756 acres in Albemarle; gently rolling and wooded; recently surveyed and flagged for easy walking. $275,000. Call Douglas Manley, 434- 960-6341. July 18-Juty 24, 2002 July 25- Ju!y 31, 2002 ~ALBE.~E LA?ID nd Approximately 70 acres residential la for sale in Preddy Creek area of Albemarle with access from Preddy Creek Road near Ruckersville. Recently surveyed, this parcel is wood- ed and gently rolling. $275,000. Call Douglas Manley, 434-960-6341. #340O24 August 1 - August 7. 2002 ?0ACRES: ,. · ~ Enjoy the Woods of this gently roiling, private parcel of residential land. With part of the land in Albemarle and part in Orange. there is easy access from Rt 29 or Rt. 33. Offered at $275,000 with subdivision rights and survey avail- able. Call Douglas Manley, 434-960- 6341 for directions and information. #340024 )ublic Access To Trail ;upported By 9ount¥ brought different trou- TI s Pelton rhe t..gress Staff kn old grave] road in western )emarle County has wound its y into the Blue Ridge Mountains ~r Brown's Cove for almost 200 iTS, ~rown's Gap Turnpike once was trategic route for Thomas "Ston- all' Jackson's troops as they inched attacks on Union troops the Shenandoah Valley during ; Civil War. ['oday the road, marked on maps Route 629, is the focus ora mod- ~ skirmish. It is perhaps best de- ibed as the Battle of Bolted re, and it is being fought with al arguments and briefs. mst summer, landowner Ed- rd H. Ripper barricaded the ~d ~Sth a locked gate and a "No ~spassing" sign in hopes of stop- g a parade of poachers and lit- bugs who used what he says is land as a shortcut to the Shen- ioah National Park. bles. Park officials complained that Ripper had obstTucted one of the few hiking roads into the national park from Albemarle Count)'. Hikers mourned the death of one of the most breathtaking mountain trails in Central Virginia, which leads to a pair of waterfalls and the Appalachian Trail. Albemarle County officials said Ripper had no right to close a pub- lic road. They denied Ripper's request that the county abandon public rights to the trail and asked him to remove the lock. Ripper refused. The county said it would sue. County Attorney George R. St. John on Friday filed a bill in Albe- marle County Circuit Court asking for a "permanent injunction" that would require Ripper to remove the gate and refrain from obstructing public access to the road. The county charged that Ripper's gate "deprives the public use and enjo)~ent of a public property Progre~,s Photo by Slarke Jetl Landowner's Gate Marks,End Of State-Maintained Road Lawsuit States Route 629 Should Remain Open To Public right and constituzes a public nui- sarice." Ripper's attorney, Frederick W. Payne, fired back in defense of his clj,pnt. "These are not lawless people," he said. "This is not a question of them drawing an arbitrary line in the sand. This is a leg4timate prop- erty dispute. And it will be settle, by a judge." The legal struggle centers on on question: Is jt a public or a privat road? The count',, argues that the sec t/on of road on Ripper's proper( has prox~ded public access to th Please see GATE, Page B4 B4 THE DALLY PROGRESS, Charlottesville, Virginia, Sunday, February 25, 1.990 Gate Continued from Page BI Shenandoah National Park since the park's fbunding in the 1930% St. John said. State maintenance on the road ends in the middle of Ripper's land, before the park's boundary, St. John wrote. But the unmaintained section has never been abandoned as a public road, he wrote. Ripper's position is that Brown's Gap Road becomes private prop- erty where state maintenance ends, Payne said. Because the road dead-ends in private property, Ripper should be allowed to raise a gate to keep tre- spassers away, he said. "Mr. Ripper has experienced a significant level of illegal activities on his property brought on by use of the road, including: poaching, spotlighting of game, trespassing, dumping, littering and the riding of all-terrain vehicles and motorcy- cles,'' Ripper's surveyor wrote to the Board of Supervisors. "This is exactly like if some stranger walked up onto your porch and started reading a news- paper," Payne said. '~'ou'd tell them to get off of your porch, wouldn't you?" Shenandoah National Park offi- cials say they do not want an ira- portant public route into the park closed. There are only two hiking routes into the park from Albemarle County -- Brown's Gap and Sugar Hollow. The road through Ripper's prop- erty is the only way hikers can reach two of the most beautiful waterfalls in the southern half' of the park ~ the James River Falls and the Doy!es River Falls -- with- out driv/ng onto the Skyline Drive, said park Superintendent William Wade. The attempt to close the road is part of a larger problem: an in- creasing number of' landowners along the boundaries of the park are dosing public entrances, he said. Among other problems, the trend is making it difficuIt for hikers to walk from the crest of the Blue Ridge into the counties below, Wade said. Hikers say they want the road left open for a simpler reasoni it is one of the most beautiful three- mile waIks in Central Virginia. "That walk is one of the most specmcular walks around," said hiking enthusiast Peyton Robert- son. "The view from that road look- ing down into the valleys ... is one of'the most beautiful I've seen." "The Doyles River Falls are sur- rounded by some very old hem- locks," said Robertson. "It's shad- owed and very cool in the summer." The Virginia General Assembly commissioned the construction ,of the Brown's Gap Turnpike in 1800. The road took on military signifi- cance during the Civil War. In the late spring of 1862, Stonewall Jackson an.d his soldiers briefly oc-~ cupied the western, fringes of bemarle County, including Brown's Gap. The troops traveled over the Blue ' Ridge using Brown's Gap Turnpike as they maneuvered to outsmart, Union forces during the Shenam' doah Valley Campaign. Jackson's. 17,000 troops were victorious in this campaign, defeating 60,000 Union troops with a series of raids,,. rapid maneuvers and surprise tacks. MR. ~o BOURNE .¥AYLAND OF THE SOiL AND t~/ATER CONSERVATION SERVICE APPEARED AND PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING WATERSHED STUDY; "As YOUR SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION SUPERVISOR IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ I FEEL IT MY OBLIGATION TO INFORM YOU OF THE CRITICAL NEEDS CONCERNING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION OF OUR WATER RESOURCES. FOR THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS~ WE HAVE HAD A SEVERE~ PROLONGED DROUGHT. IT HAS CAUSED CROP FAILURES FOR THE FARMERS, HOMEOWNERS HAVE SEEN THEIR WELLS GO DRY, ~ATER RESTRICTIONS HAVE BEEN ENFORCED BY COMMUNITIES TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE WATER FOR ]DOMESTIC USES. FORTUNATELY~ THE MUCH NEEDED RAINS CAME TO OUR RESCUE iN SEPTEMBER. OUR GROUNI~- WATER AqUiFERS HAVE BEEN RECHARGED TEMPORARILY. RUNOFF EVEN CAUSED SCATTERED FLOODING PROBLEMS IN THE COUNTY. BUT THIS DOES NOT MEAN OUR PROBLEMS ARE OVER° YOUR COUNTY ~ARD OF SUPERVISORS ARE KEENLY AWARE OF THIS. THEY KNOW WE MUST HAVE AN ADEQUATE PROGRAM FOR THE CONSERVATION OF WATER FOR THE PEOPLE AND INDUSTRIES ALREADY LOCATED HERE. THEY ALSO REALIZE THAT WATER IS A VITALLY IMPORTANT FACTOR IN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF RAPIDLY DEVELOPING ALBEMARLE COUNTY. ~HAT IS MORE IMPORTANT~ THEY HAVE DONE SOMETHING ABOUT IT. RECENTLY~ THEY REQUESTED THAT THE THOMAS JEFFERSON SOIL AND ~ATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MAKE A WATERSHED RESOURCE STUDY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE ENgINEErS DIVIDED THE COUNTY INTO WATERSHED AREAS. DAM SITES WERE SELECTED ON THE BASIS OF POTENTIAL FOR FLOOD PREVENTION~ WATER SUPPLY AND RECREATION. THE COUNTY [XECUTIVE~ 0TIS ~ROWN~ FURNISHED INFORMATION ON PRESENT WATER NEEDS AND FUTURE GROWTH AREAS IN THE ~OUNTY FOR THE STUDY. FROM THIS OVERALL STUDY~ THE SUPERVISORS HAVE SELECTED SIX WATER- SHEDS TO 8E STUDIED FURTHER. THEY ARE: TOTIER CREEK - THIS WATERSHED HAS EXCELLENT PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND FOR WATER SUPPLY USE BY THE TOWN OF SCOTTSVILLE. PRESENTLY~ THE TOWN HAS OUTGROWN ITS ANTIQUATED SYSTEM~ HOWEVER~ THE ENTIRE COST OF THIS PROJECT MUST BE BORNE BY THE COUNTY. ~ECAUSE OF ITS PRIXIMITY TO THE JAMES ~IVER~ THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION TO SPONSOR A PRO~ECT WITH SMALL ~ATERSHED FUNDS (PL-566), BECAUSE OF ITS PROXIMITY TO THE RIVANNA ~IVER THIS HOL~ TRUE ON THE SiTE AT [ARLYSVILLE ALSO. STOCKTON CREEK - THIS WATERSHED IS LOCATED IN THE WESTERN PART OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY AND DRAINS THE SOUTH--EASTERN SLOPE OF THE BLUE ~IDGE TO ROCKFISH GAP. THIS IS VERY FINE SOURCE OF WATER THAT BLENDS ITSELF NICELY IN WITH THE PRESENT ~EAVER CREEK WATERSHED AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT IS TAKING PLACE IN THAT AREA.' A 1~0 ACRE LAKE PROVIDING ~.227 ACRE FEET OF WATER (1~©~8,?75.©0© GALS.) COULD BE CONSTRUCTED HERE. THiS PROJECT COULD CONCEIVEABLE qUALIFY FOR FOR PL-5~ FUNDS. Two PROBLEMS WILL HAVE TO BE RESOLVED IN THIS WATERSHED. THE COUNTY WILL HAVE TO GET THE COOPERATION OF THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT CONCERNING THE DESIGN OF ~OUTE #~ WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO CROSS IN OR VERY NEARBY THE PRO- POSED SITE. ALSO~ THERE IS A POLLUTION PROBLEM WHICH MUST BE WATCHED CLOSELY. ~yCK ISLAND -- THIS WATERSHED LIES 1N THE EASTERN SECTION OF THE COUNTY SOUTHEAST OF MON- TICELLO AND EXTENDS FROM THE ~IVANNA ~IVER TO CARTER ~)UNTAIN. IT SHOWS GREAT PROMISE FOR DEVELOPMENT WITH COUNTY AND ~L-~ FUNDS. THE PRELIMINARY STUDY SHOWS THAT ONE LARGE AND TWO SMALLER STRUCTURES WOULD PROVIDE FLOOD AND SEDIMENT CONTROL~ WATER SUPPLY~ AND RECREATIONAL AREA. LISTED BELOW ARE THE CAPACITIES OF THE TENTATIVE SITES= NO. NORMAL POOL ~C~ F~ GALLONS OR (1-8) 305 ~,606 1,496,950,000 5 51 576 187,200,000 7 69 701 227,825,000 A PROdECT OF THIS NATURE WOULD NOT ONLY PREVENT FLOODS BUT FURNISH WATER FOR [X}MESTIC AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY. ~Y INCORPORATING RECREATIONAL FACILITIES INTO THE GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT THIS TOO COULD BECOME A SHOW PLACE AND JOY FOREVER. I WOULD MAKE THIS A HIGH PRIORITY PROOECT. ~UCK ~OUNTAIN -- A SINGLE STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED NEAR BOONESVILLE JUST OFF OF ROUTE (~)1 COUED, WITH CAREFUL PLANNING~ BECOME ANOTHER "BiG MEADOWS" WITH A ONE HUNDRED ACRE LAKE FOR RECREATION~ DOMESTIC AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY. BECAUSE OF ITS LOCATION~ I WOULD CONSIDER THIS A MUST PROdECT. HOWEVER~ TAKING A LONG LOOK AT COUNTY DEVELOPMENT~ I WOULD SUGGEST A LOWER PRIORITY THAN T~TtER~ ~UCK ISLAND AND STOCKTON CREEK WATERSHEDS. IVY CREEK -- AS NOW PROPOSED THIS WOULD HAVE TO BE TWO STRUCTURES. THE LARGER STRUCTURE IS ON A WATERSHED OF APPRX. ~8~8 ACRES. THIS WOULD BE A MULTIPLE PURPOSE STRUCTURE~ STORING ~000~000~000 GALS. OF WATER FOR DOMESTIC USE. AT THIS STORAGE LEVEL THE LAKE SURFACE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 12¢ ACRES. IT WOULD BE A NEEDED FLOOD CONTROL STRucTuRE WITH APPROXIMATELY ~0© ACRES OF FLOOD PLAIN BELOW THE SITE, A SECOND STRUCTURE IS BEING ITS SURFACE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES, ] WOULD GIVE THIS THE LOWEST PRIORITY OF THE SlX. i~REDDY~S CREEK - THIS IS AN EXCELLENT MULTIPLE-PURPOSE WATERSHED WITH THREE FEASIBLE DAM SITES, THE GENERAL AREA INVOLVED IS NORTHEAST OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, THE PRELIMINARY FIGURES SHOW: STRUCTURE NOt S!~E AC.~T. GALLONS 1} l&? 2,117 688,025,000 3 42 431 140,075,000 a 8? 825 268,125,000 ~ECAUSE OF THE PRESENT EARLYSVILLE PROJECT~ I WOULD SUGGEST A 4TH PLACE PRIORITY ON THIS. HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF GROWTH IN THE AREA, LAND ACQUISITION SHOULD BE STRESSED HERE. EMPHASIS SHOULD BE STRESSED AT THIS TIME IN SECURING ADDITIONAL ACREAGE FOR RECREA- TION, WHICH WAS OVERLOOKED WHEN THE BEAVER CREEK WATERSHED WAS DEVELOPED, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTES 50 PERCENT TOWARDS THE ACQUISITION OF RECREATION LANDS. By SECURING THESE FACILITIES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR COUNTY AND THOSE EMPLOYED IN THE LOCAL IN- DUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS~ IT WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL ATTRACTION TO THOSE ON VACATION TRAVELING THE SKYLINE DRIVE AND PARKWAYS EACH SUMMER, AS WELL AS THOSE USING INTERSTATE 64. glTH THE SIX WATERSHEDS tN MIND, I FEEL THE FIRST THREE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRIORITY FOR I~MEDIATE CONSIDERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. NOW IS THE TIME FOR CiViC LEADERS~ SERVICE CLUBS, AND INDIVIDUALS TO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION. THEY MUST MAKE TBEIR WISHES KNOWN TO THE BOARD OF ~UPERVISORS AND GET BEHIND THEM CONCERNING THIS VERY IMPORTANT MATTER. ~ATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ARE LOCAL INTEREST PROGRAMS. ET IS~ THEREFORE, ESSENTIAL THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC VOICE THEIR OPINIONS. AS IN THE PAST, THE THOMAS JEFFERSON SOIL AND ~ATER CONSERVATION DIS- TRICT STAND READY TO ASSIST IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THESE WORTHWHILE AND NECESSARY PROdECTS.~ ~ATERSH£D SITE CAPACITIES (APPROX.) B U C K [ S L A N D ~;REDDYS CREEK TOTIER CREEK BUCK ~UNTAIN STOCKTON CREEK Ivy CREEK COST OF DAM NO, NORMAL POOL AC. FT. CONSTR. (APPROX,) GALLONS lA 140 1,869 $ 95,000.00 607,425,000 lB 305 4,606 200,000.00 1,496~950,000 5 51 576 54,720.00 187,200,000 7 69 701 49,771.00 227,825~000 lB 147 2,117 93,148.00 688,025,000 3 42 431 31,032.00 140~075,000 4 87 825 69,300.00 268,125,000 1 345 4,518 135,500.00 1~477~386,000 2 283 4,736 166,?00.00 1,548,672,000 1 95 3,120 1,020~240,000 2 105 1,5OO 490,500,000 3 30 620 202,740,000 AB 150 3,272 lg6,500.00 1,048,755,000 1 125 3,077 1,000,000,000 2 80 6~320 2~060~000,000 THIS IS THE ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE DAM ~QT INCLUDING LAND, ACquISITION, SURVEYS~ LEGAL~ ENGINEERING AND CLEARING. COMMUNICATIONS WERE RECEIVED FROM THE YVOMANIS CLUB OF CROZET AND THE CLAUDIUS CROZET F'ARK~ INC. ENDORSING THE STOCKTON CREEK PROJECT, THE FOREGOING REPORT WAS GIVEN CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION AND THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUBMITTED HIS RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE MATTER. ON MOTION OF MR. YANCEY~ SECONDED BY MR'. ~AULETT~ THE SOIL CONSERVATION ~ERVICE WAS THANKED FOR ITS REPORT AND THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE WAS ACCEPTED AS FOLLOWS: i THAT THE COUNTY PROCEED iMMEDIATELY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS FOR TOTIER CREEK~ SITE NO. 1. (2) MAKE APPLICATION TO THE THOMAS JEFFERSON ~ATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND U.S. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE FOR ~UCK ISLAND~ SITE NO. 1A, AND PROCEED WITH LAND ACQUISITION. (]) PROCEED WITH PLANS FOR LAND OPTIONS ON PREDDYS CREEK, S'ITE No. lB AND STOCKTON CREEK, J ~State of Virginia, -- ~County of Orange, to-wit: I, Mary Iv~ Smith, a Notary .Public in and for the County end State afore- said, do hereby certif7 that .¥ernie Mahoney whose name ia signed to t~ foregoing deed bearin~ date on ~ptember 1~ 1943~ ~$ ackno~le~ed the sa~ before ~e in ~ said Co~W. ~Y co~lasion e~ire8 ~ 23~ 1945.. 9~ven ~der ~ ~nd ~la let da~ of September 194~. r~ I~ Smith Notary Public. inton lying in ~ange Cowry and bonded as follo=a: Bes~nnin~ at a ~hlte oak at a ~ate corner tv J. Colvln, thence N. 64 3/4~ 8. 66 9/10 poles to a atone corner to L. W. Mundy and Charles H. Washington thence with Washington ~ poles to a Double White oak thence No 34 1/4° W. 11 poles to corner on west side road thence crossing the read N. 87 8. 1 ole to corner at sate post, thence with Jack Daehnell S. 84 ~/4° ~o 24 4/1~ poles to pointera corner with ¢olvin thence with h~m S. ? 1/4 W. 86 poles to a Double white oak thence S. · . ~8 1/4 poles to the beginning conta~ning 2~ acres ~ Roods end 05 poles. ~gust Slat, 1~0~ J.R. Ferguaon ~eptyo $. ~n Orange Circuit Court Clerk's Office, Virginia September 4th, This Deed dated September let, 1945, was this day received in the office aforesaid end together with the certificate thereon w~itten, admitted to record ~ at 9 o'clock A. M. 1652B I RED OAK Z(,,, f~'ql A BOUNDARY SURVEY ARTHUR L. OEHMKE B~RBOUR DISTRICT OLD ' · ' ROD SET SET ~OD SET IN OAK STUNP S TOIV£ FO. _ STEARNS £. SCALE: I ~ = 200 ~ · ~ ~" ~ i ~ ~ ~ 8~~ c. T~ - 5~ - ~5 ;4 t~ u ' ~v u A ;Y r SURVEY CA RL ~.~ ~UTNER. ORANSZ .... COUNTY. VIReIN(A ~OLc~AN. C~ I.onnie ~. ~4CWilliams 15%06 [.l~i.'/illiams Drive Barboursvi 1 le, 22923 (7n3) 832-304P., Proposal Submitted To: City_ Char~ oete~ril 1~_ ~ra 92~1 State ...... Phone ~ ~ Sheet No. Work To Be Performed At: IStreet. /city- /Date of Plans LArchitect State IWe hereby propose to furnish the materials and poi'form the labor necessary for the completion of -- Ap_Dm~.oxtm_a~aly .?~CLO0 ~-e~t ~ clr~ ~.~_~y ao~_BJ_~_o_f_ the ~ C~ng ~ong ~~ng r~. ~~g and d~ch~oa~be.~ fo 11 o~zing. Layi~-zh--~5"-~e~_!2 feea~_La~f more a~ ad~!tlonal e~_st., c~f 7-~00 per ~b~ Laying and spre~m~Ying--SO0 tons--o£ H~-$ s-to,me_. All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of with payments to be made as follows: Payment d~]e _i:q £U~L1 when road bed Dollars($ ). is ready for stone to cam lete_~ob.-- 4,62ri.nO Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be oxecuted only upon written orders, and will become an Pxtr8 charge over and above the e~timate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. OWner to carry fire, tornado and other neces~sary insurance upon above work. Work- men's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be ~,,;,en Out hy . C ,I Williams Excavating Lonmie J. [4c!,lilliams Respectfully submitted Note--This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within ~ 90 days. ACCEPTANCE DF PROPOSAL '~ ' he above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do ~he work as specified. Payment will be made es outlined above. Signature Date Signature .................... ,J TOPSIde- FORM 3850 ORIGINAL ~'~ This Deed made end entered into t~his 23rd day of July, 19/~9, · by..and between Lindsa¥ ;7. 4.'unda¥, Jr., ~d Ele~or L~day, his '~fe, ,~rt~es of %~e f~s~ ~rZ ~d $. B. H~son, ~r~y of the .sec ~d' ~rt, ~FITk~SE TH: That for and in consideration af t~he sum of Three Thousand (.~3600.00~ Dollars cash .in hand paid by the said. party of ~he seeaud~ ~art Go the p~rties of the first Part.the r?ceipt ?~reof. ~.: is.here~y acknowledged, the pa~ties af the first part' have-~bar~ai~ ' . an~ sold S~d by thes~~ pr~esents db grant and co~'eY~r~th~Ge~eX~l ~ .. ' All those two. certain adjoining ~raats or parcels of~.~d Rivann~ Dis~rict,'Albemarle County, ~irginia~' and h~' ~ ?... containing. Forty ~ur. an??ort¥ Eight ifundredth.s :f~48): AC'res ~ ,. . ~o~a~e~.. ~ea~ Burn~ey-,Sta~ion on the Off~ce t o~.Orange:CoU~ty i~ Deed .B~ok 85 at' rage 253 ~ rec'orded: ' in ~he' Clerk's office of Albemarle. County L~ Deed Boo~ 186-at'page 30;. ~ reference is' hereby mdc to sa~ deed ~ the deeds there~nj'' . ~eferred ~o f~ a ~re acc~ate description of said p~per~y; ~ge~her 'tktth a fro~ L. W. ~day~ wife to' C~rtes H~ ~o~son recorded ~ the Clerk~, ~'o~':.ro~,:O~ge County in Oeea.Bo0~ 6~' at ~e ~* : : Sai~' re~,~esta~'.Is..conve~d ~owever sub~eo~ t'~ a =ese~a~ion of one-rough of an ff~re bei~ the Mu~ay f~ly.ceme:ery as set -- forth and described ~n a certain deed from the p~ies of ~he firstly betveen Sazax~l Collier and Louise So Collier, his wife, pa~ties of the,first and William Earl Collier, par~ of the second pa~, That for a~ fu. consi~eratiom of ~he sum ef $10 cash ~ ~ ~ ~ e~ipt whe~of ~ is ac~ledged, ~' o~r ~ ~ ~ble cons~em~n ~ of ~ se~ ~ ~ ~t ce~ lot or p~cel of ~ ~ted ~ ~ ~ ~s~b~ as fo~o~; ~ti be~ga~ a ~ mp~ n~r a of ~e f~st )eed B~ok ~ at Page ~, ~ w~sh de~ ~f~ce ~ is ~e for a ~e ~ap of land lo, sted in Bsrbour Dlstrict, Orange Co. Va.ahowing adjoining land o~nere end tea , part of the es ate of late J.~. Edwards, In the prepa~'aaon oi d~is ab~trac~ [ have ~n ali ca~es relied u~n the correctness ol tile records and indexes. As to mattezs not properly recorded or i~xed, I can expz'ess no o~nion. I find no xeaso~ appearing of record why W~drow Corl~ration cannot convey a g~d and merchant~le title. The taxes fox' 1903 must be ap~rtioned and are as follows: Orange County, 44.48 acres T. M. 52-32 $5. 40, 97.72 acres T.M. 52-33, $11.10; Albemarle County, 100 ac~'es T. M. 22-21 and 1.81.. 38 ac~es T. M. 2202 togefler $90. 44. The~e are two cemeteries ou the p~operty, one on the 100 acres tract which la reduced to 80 ac~es conveyed in D. B. 197, p. 289, June 16, 1927 and one onthe 297 ac~'e txact . There have been electz-ic zights of way and telephone rights of way granted: D.B. 351, p. 291, July 22, 1959 Telephone tlow far this effects the land will have to be detexmined by inspection of tile land. P,e.qtriction against ba~ n or animal sl~elter within Mary E. ~ dwelling, D. B. 357, p. 227 (Albemarle). The. pm'chaser muat examine the property io~ himself to ascertain thc right8 of any persion in [~ssession and thc existence oi any easement~ such as electric lines, telephone lines, drainage rights, d~ iveways, cemeteries or encroachmmts of the neighbors as these ~metimes exist from long continued u~e without appeari~g of record. We made a thorough e~minatlon of the ~-ecmds in Albem~ County. We made a thorough e~amhmtion of hostile conveyances in Orange County except unde~ X&'llliam A. Cooke and William A. Cooke Incor[~ated. It would take a full day o~' more for a thorough examination of the Oxange ~-ecmds thez-e a~-e so nlany. LAw orrmr~q GILMER AND }I[NNRICH CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 40. At a regular meeting of the Orange County Planning Commission held January 6, 1987 beginning at 7:45 PM in Room 114 of the Orange County Courthouse. Present: R. Jones, Chairman, H. DeJarnette, J. Nolan, W. Roberts, J. Colvin, R. Morin, J. Marshall, W. Speiden, R. Hall & H. Kubeo Also T. Baskerville, County Administrator. Absent: H. Knoell The commission considered a road waiver request by Mr. John C. Shifflett for division of a 29 acre parcel off Rto 644 into three parcels. [Mr. DeJarnette disclosed his interest in this case as an ~adjoining landowner and refrained from participating in this discussion and action.] The Commission noted Mr. Shiflett had obtained a road waiver for this property before and discussed if it was a good policy to allow two or more road waivers on any one parcel. After discussion and upon motion of Mr. Nolan, seconded 43.'~ by Mr. Marshall and carried the road waiver was approved. Ayes: 9 Abstain: DeJarnette Absent: Knoell PRIVATE ROAD POLICY The Planning Commission then adopted the policy to discourage more than one private road waiver per parcel of land and to encourage a maintenance agreement between all property owners on private roads by motion of Mr. DeJarnette, seconded by Mr. Speiden and carried unaminously. V. Ro Jones, chairman JAN d 1981 The Commission then considered the following road waivers: John C. Shifflett request a road waiver for 2 lots off Route 644. Mr. DeJarnette disqualified himself as an adjoining landowner. Upon motion by Mr. Nolan and seconded by Mrs. Kube and carried Lots D and Tract #1 on a 50 R/W off Route 644 were approved. REC~!' ~ ..... ~$ MEETING Date: ~;. I q L~.~-~. RECEIVED AT BOS MEETING Date:, ~ t~' ~ ~ Agenda ~tem #:# Clerk's initials: To: Members, Board of Supervisors From: Ella Washington Carey, CMC, Clerk Subject: Reading List for August 14, 2002 Date: August 8, 2002 Februan/6, 2002 March 20 (A), 2002 March 25 (A), 2002 April 3, 2002 Dorrier Pages I- 27 (end with Item ~12) - Ms. Thomas [Vlr. Rooker Ms. Thomas Pages 14 (beginning with Item #14)- end - Mr. NOTE: PLEASE REMEMBER TO PULL YOUR MINUTES IF YOU HAVE NOT READ THEM. /~wc David R Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier, Scottsville Charles S. Martin Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800 August 15, 2002 Walter E Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Rooker Jack Jouett Sally H. Thomas Samud Miller Mr. Gerald G. Utz Contract Administrator Department of Transportation 701 VDoT Way Ch_arlotteswiUe, VA 22911 Dear Mr. Utz: /ewc Enclosed please find an Extract from Minutes of August 14, 2002, in which the Board of Supervisors adopted the Six Year Secondary Road Plan and Budget. If you need any additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, EUa V~. Carey, C Enclosure cc: Juan Wade EXTRACT FROM MINUTES The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, hereby certifies that on June 5, 2002, the Board of Supervisors were presented with a list of changes to the Six Year Secondary Construction Program. The Board is aware that the allocations for the Program have been reduced and estimated advertisement dates adjusted for the FY 2002/03 thru FY 2007/08 Secondary System Construction Program. At its meeting on August 14, 2002, the Board of Supervisors approved changes to the revised FY 2002/03 thru FY 2007/08 Secondary System Construction Program and acknowledged that the FY 2002/03 allocations are also the budget amounts for that year. WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, this 15th day of August, 2002. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Approval of Secondary System Construction Program SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Board of Supervisors approval of changes to the FY 2002/03 thru 2007/08 Secondary System Construction Program STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs.,Tucker,Foley,Cilimberg,Benish,Wade AGENDA DATE: August 14, 2002 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: INFORMATION: Yes BACKGROUND: On June 5, 2002, Jim Bryan presented a list of changes to the Six Year Secondary Priority List to the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors discussed these changes at its monthly transportation worksession. The changes were related to budget issues at the State level. VDOT has submitted a handout identifying these changes (Attachment A). DISCUSSION: The changes in the funding did not impact the priorities of the projects approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 16, 2002 (Attachments B & C with revised dates), but the revisions did impact the total number of projects in VDOT Secondary System Construction Program and the estimated advertisement dates for projects in VDOT's Plan. The Board of Supervisors are not required to hold another public hearing, but VDOT is requiring the County to indicate its awareness that the allocations have been reduced and estimated advertisement dates adjusted for the FY 2002/03 thru FY 2007/08 Secondary System Construction Program. This is to be done by approving the County's Six Year Secondary Priority List and VDOT Secondary System Construction Program with the most recent cost estimates and advertising dates. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve the changes to the revised FY 2002/03 thru FY 2007/08 Secondary System Construction Program. .. COMMONWEALTH of VH G!N PHIUP ~ '$HUCET DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOA'TAT]ON 70~' ~DOT WAY CHARLD-[TEgVIU. E'VA M~r, Rot).ert'Tucker jr,. County Executive 401 Mclntire Road charlottesville, VA 22.902 May 9,2002 ATI'A(]I I M B'; N'I' A ReWsed Six-Year-lin prove, ment P ~an Dear Mr. Bob: · . As you ate aware. Governor Warner dFrected VDOT ~o overhaul the Vlrgbia Tran=~J1~ation Develc~pment Plan. (i~ieJuding 'ell the secondary six year plar~s), in order to assuce that the pra.~s reflect' real,it ~;est estimates and.achievable schedufes, the secondary six year plan fOr Albemarle Ceur~ty be~linning rn-2002 wJrj undergo modEications. ...: Accordi~gly~. we modified revenue projections for ~e future years 2002/03 1~mugh 40 reflect the CommonweaP, h's economic ferecaat,. The fofrowing I:abJe reflects fha ~'mp=ct on tl~ ' courity's seCOndary., six year plan that ~e 8~rd of Supervisors approver* on February 14., 2002~ · Tomt T~at Differe. nce ~ % D~Tere~ :' . FJ,~a~ P~ Tentative Prev/(x~ SYP 01 & Prey. bus S'YP 0t' _,.. Year . SYP 20~1 S'YP ~ Tentative SYP 02 Tentative S'YP · FY 02.A~ ' 5,470,847 3,2.55;~7 (2,215~ t~:~ ....... "" FY Q3"0~ 5,42~,745 4,277,906 (1,150,839) -21:20~ FY'05~ 6,093,3~ 3J~6,947 (2.126,409) -3~..90%' FY07,,08 ~,181r'J51 4,016,301 ,, (2,164,850) We validated the ex/st[n0 cDst es~mates for each pr~ct in ~he.pmvio'ualy approved /C~ plan'to assure lhat they are reasonable, and we adjusted the ~J~ocation of.funds for ~he.sb;-yea~ · pe~i~l year based, eh the new p,"~jecfi~ns f~r. Albemarle COunty, As ~ res~Jt, some projects '!dr~pped off because Of a shofcage of funds. They are' ' · Pti. # 15 Rte. 0726 {James RJve]' Rd.) · . PH. # 18 R~. 0810 (Br0wn's Gap Rd.) · Pd. # 19 . Rte. 0795 (Blenheim Rd.) · Pd. #28 Rte. 0623 (Woods Edge Rcl,) .. '. o Pn". # 29 Rte. 078.4 (Doer. ors Crossing Rd.) ,, Pd. # 30 Rt~. (]712 (Coles Crossing Rd.) TRANSPOr~TATION FOR TH~: 31 ~ C.ENTU~Y We also validated the existing advertfaement dates for the projects because a change in allocation .c. ouU afflsct (he dates. The. criteria we 0sad rn valktating the dams relIed not onhj on a~ievfng full funidjng, but aL?,o on the de.velopme~ of oonstru~on plans; the rak~oafion of utflrti~=' an~'t.he a~quisition of the necessary ~ght~of-way. We saw no reason t~ m'0difg ihe 'ed dates' fo~ prion't[es 1 - 6. However for raasons not ' related'to fur~cling ~Le. U(iii~le~ and R~ght of Way)~ we moved the Mclntire Road.pre.[~ct (Pno~. 5)to June 2005. The following table summarizes, flee projecls remaining on the six yea.r plan with .the revised total coat and new advee'~sement dates. Secondary System Constm~on Program F~'iorTty Roube Tota./ Ad. · Number 'Number Route Name Project Cost Date 150,(100 Pe~ Year 2 ~25 Hatt~n Fen'y 20,000 'Per Year 3' 1641 West Leigh Dr. 500,000 · Dec-02 4 g9~8 Corville Farm Rd. 150,000 Mar-03 5 631 Mc.,J~tire Rd. 15,70g,6[X~ Jtm-05 6 6a,9 Airport Rd. 1 [3,944,050 Dec-C)3 7 R0il{) Fmestate Connector 3,3.~,00D ? 8 R0O0 Meadow Creek Pkwy. 37,500,000 ? 9 ·691' Jarman Gap 'Re, 5,1 ,SO,000 Jun-06 10 S49 Profit Rd. 9,50~,000 Jun-OS 11 601 Old Ivy Rd. 7,200,0D'0 12. 6156 Georgetcta~ Rd. 3,200,000 ? · 13 781 Sunset Ave.' 1,650,000 ? 14 631 Old Lyncfiburg Rd. 1,500,000 .A.draf[ copy of the recommended ~L'vised plan is being provided With this letter. After you review it, you.may decide that a new public hear~ng should be hel=l to re-v~sit and re-approve t~e 2002/03 Six-Year Plan priorrdes and. the 2002/03 budget Jist[ng. If you deterrn[ne that tl~e revised 2002/03 p~an is saJI ~onsJsmnt with the counb/s desires orthe changes are not significant enough fo. wan-ant a new-heading, wa ask that you' advise us by ream maiJ an~ that you include the Srx-Year Plan tJtte sheet, signed with a new date_ Please dorlrt JleS~ate to call me or the Resrdenoy staff if you have any ¢ruestions. CCP OD: ~x..._.~ent Engineer Wayne Cilimbeng, David Banish, Juandiego W~de -"Et. [;Jr~ :9 [l~lp ..~ -IT I~. I~, .~_. '~1 L'tm. [.:L~ ['.-~'1 14"h~. ~4(- ~_1_ I_. 11_= ;-.i O4.-I [~--:1 ~-~-'1 ['1;.:.1 -"~.~."1 .'1:.;.i ?1- :,~,1 · ~ -Tm) ',~lvcrJ~rdmem . lal~ e th-'~ ~r Count: ~ma~ Con~{~u~tlon Program E~]rnat~d ABoC~tion=' ~1ot7 .. galTlcl: c:ueear ~,ECOt~,.AEY S'Y~TEM CON~'T~UC'~ION PROGF~M ¢o~n~ ,P,.l~rre-~ (itl deilanl} Dat~ 7,a.,~ 8~ ~r .. SE~ONOAE¥~-FEM 6ON:~TP~UE~Of~ PROGFT~,M · C~ur~c. Al'~er~mrl~ ,CJi'ii doll[ars} 'Pal3=' 5 aT'7 ,..3 ~,a: ~iAI{YO ~ ~T PLEASE SIGN BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON SP-02-10 AND SP-02-11 RIVERBEND ASSOCIATES AUGUST 14, 2002 NAME (Please print clearly) 3 4 i0 11 ~'3 '14 ' 15 17 ~8 19 21 22 PHONE NUMBER/ADDRESS (Optional) RECEIVED AT BOS MEE~ View from Rt. 250 W.B.L~ 4 - View from Rt. 250 Note that the light colored car is parked at the front edge of the vehicle storage area~ The building will be behind the existing double sycamore and existing building on the right~ Proposed landscaping will also screen the shopping center acent to Vehicle Storage Area Neighboring property adjacent to Vehicle Storage Area Proposed Vehicle Storage Area with ex]sting screening looking to the southwest. Additional Greenway screening is proposed in tiffs area View of ske from Rivanna Trail at auto repak shop. View of site from Rivanna Tra~l and auto repair shop Typical 10M2'riverbank near site View of site fi:om Greenway - The site is over 20 fi~ above the Greenway, with full vegetative screening. View from Free Bridge (winter) - Existing screening, steep banks. The proposed development includes addkional evergreen screening adjacent to the building and vehicle storage area. July 9, 2002 James Morris P O Box 8043 Charlottesville, VA 22906 RE: SP-2002-010 Riverbend; SP-2002-011 Riverbend and SDP-2002-022 Pavillion at Riverbend Tax Map 78, Parcel 17A Dear Mr. Morris: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on July 2, 2002, unanimously recommended denial of the above-noted petitions to the Board of Supervisors. Should the Board of Supervisors chose to approve these special use permits, the Planning Commission recommends the following conditions: SP-2002-010 Riverbend and SP-2002-011 Riverbend 1. Vehicles shall not be elevated. 2. Vehicles shall be stored/displayed only in the areas indicated on the approved site plan. 3. The use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is approved by the ARB, including landscape and lighting site plans. 4. Provide vegetative screening in the area north and west of the biofilter, west of the dumpster, and west of the parking area to help screen the view from the road. An informal grouping of native screening trees and shrubs is appropriate. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on August 14, 2002. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. SDP-2002-022 Pavillion at Riverbend: Denied because the proposed use on the site plan is inconsistent to the uses that are allowed by right and requires a special use permit. Should the Board of Supervisors grant the special use permits, the Planning Commission requests that the final site plan come back before them. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Yadira Amarante Planner Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jack Kelsey STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: Yadira Amarante July 2, 2002 August 14, 2002 SP 02-10 Riverbend Vehicle Rental & Maintenance Facility SP 02-11 Riverbend Outdoor Storage & Display SDP 02-22 Pavilion at Riverbend Preliminary Site Plan Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary site plan to construct a 2,770 sq. ft. building and parking for the purposes of operating a vehicle rental and maintenance facility (i.e. U-Haul) within the Entrance Corridor. Approval of two special use permits is required before approval of the preliminary site plan can be granted. One SP is for the allowance of motor vehicle sales and rental in the urban area as designated in the Comprehensive Plan, and the other is for the allowance of outdoor storage and display within an Entrance Corridor. In this case, the designated Entrance Corridor is Route 250. Petition: Request for preliminary site plan approval, contingent upon the approval of two (2) special use permits. A permit must be obtained for the operation of a vehicle rental facility, in accordance with Section 22.2.2(8) of the Zoning Ordinance, which allows for motor vehicle sales and rental in communities and the urban area as designated in the Comprehensive Plan. Allowance of outdoor storage and display of vehicles in an Entrance Corridor also requires a permit in accordance with Section 30.6.3.2(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, which allows for outdoor storage, display and/or sales serving or associated with permitted uses, any portion of which would be visible from an Entrance Corridor street. The property, described as Tax Map 78 Parcel 17A, contains 2.478 acres, and is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District on Newhouse Drive just off of Route 250 by the Rivanna River. The property is zoned C-1, Commercial, and is within a County Entrance Corridor [Rt. 250]. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Community Service in Neighborhood 3 of the Development Area. Character of the Area: Parcel 17A is currently a vacant lot adjacent to the Rivanna River and the Pantops Shopping Center. Construction of the Riverbend Garden Apartments, which occupied the same parcel of land as this site until recently, has commenced just south of this site's location. Most of the areas to the west of the site are wooded along the Rivanna River, whereas the area directly east of the site is the rear of Pantops Shopping Center. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the proposal for conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and with Zoning Ordinance Sections 31.2.4.1, 22.2.2(8) and 30.6.3.2(b) and recommends approval of both special use permits (SP-02-10 & SP-02-11) with conditions, and approval of the preliminary site plan (SDP- 02-22). Planning and Zoning History: Development activity on Parcel 17A has largely been associated with the Riverbend Garden Apartments. These rental apartments were allowed in the C-1 district under a special use permit (SP-1999-44), which was approved with conditions. On January 31, 2001, the final site plan (SDP- 2000-97) for the apartments was approved. A recent subdivision (SUB-2002-57) has been approved in April of this year that separates the property with the apartments from the 2.478 acre subject to these permits. This subdivision also created a parcel which will be dedicated to the County for Greenway use and a second out- parcel. SPECIAL USE PERMITS Comprehensive Plan and The Neighborhood Model: Requests for special use permits in the Development Areas are assessed for conformity with the Neighborhood Model and the Land Use Plan. With the large number of car-oriented businesses located in Neighborhood 3 (Pantops), the proposed vehicle rental facility would not be a significant departure from the current land-use and character of the area. However, the Comprehensive Plan does recommend that the area designated for Community Service behind the Pantops Shopping Center (the specific location of this site) be explored for river oriented development, which this proposal does not facilitate. Though the proposal does not meet this request, there are always future opportunities for the site's redevelopment as a more river-oriented use. That aside, the proposal does further the intentions of the Comprehensive Plan by aiding with infill development efforts in the Development Areas and adding a use that would be oriented to and served by an existing internal network, which does not intensify the strip development found in the Pantops area. Given these considerations with the aforementioned land use and character of the Pantops area, this use could be supported at that location. An assessment of the proposed project as it relates to the twelve principles for development in the Neighborhood Model are provided below: Pedestrian Orientation - A 4'-6" sidewalk will extend from the proposed building to the shared boundary with the Shell station. Neighborhood Friendly Streets and Paths - No new streets are proposed with this development. It will be accessed from an existing road network. Interconnected Streets and Transportation Networks - Given the infill nature of this project it is already well connected to existing street networks. Connections emanating from this parcel would not be recommended due to the greenway parcel which surrounds it and critical slopes and flood plain associated with the Rivanna River. Parks and Open Space - Not applicable, however, it should be noted that the subdivision plat which created the subject parcel also created a parcel which will be dedicated to the County for greenway use. The greenway is located adjacent to this site. Neighborhood Center - This property is located in a shopping center. Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale - The proposed building is relatively small (< 3,000 sq. ft.) and about 2 stories tall. The mass of the building will only use 2.57% of the overall site and is compatible with other, detached, buildings in the shopping center. Conditions of approval below will help to screen this use from the Entrance Corridor. Relegated Parking - Parking is proposed and will appear to be behind the existing shopping center building. Parking will be blocked from view from Route 250 by the proposed building, the existing Shell station, the existing Hardees building and new, required, vegetative screening. Mixture of Uses - The size of the site does not lend itself well to a second use, however, the proposed use will be located in a mixed use shopping center which includes apartments. Mixture of Housing Types and Affordability - Not Applicable. Redevelopment - The infill nature of this project serves to intensify use of the shopping center rather than relocation to a more visible portion of an Entrance Corridor. Site Planning that Respects Terrain - No critical slopes or flood plain will be disturbed with the construction of the proposed use. Clear Boundaries with the Rural Areas - This site is not located along a boundary with the Rural Area. Engineering Analysis: The County's Engineering staff has reviewed this request for engineering issues related to health, safety, and welfare requirements. The Engineering Department is recommending approval of both special use permits since most of their concerns can be addressed during the review of the final site plan. ARB Considerations: The ARB has reviewed both special use permits and the site plan for appropriateness. Although they expressed no objections to the use they are recommending a number of conditions (conditions #1-5 below) intended to minimize the visual effect on the Entrance Corridor. Similarly they have approved the site plan with conditions for additional landscaping and screening, (Attachment D). STAFF COMMENT: Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance below requires that special use permits be assessed as follows: Will the use be of substantial detriment to adjacent property? Vehicle rental and maintenance at this location would not be of substantial detriment to neighboring properties given the minimal frequency of traffic that could occur for such a use. Two neighboring properties, Pantops Shopping Center and the Shell gas station, have comparatively higher amounts of traffic than this proposed use and this use should not have any negative affects on the aforesaid properties. The parcel containing the apartments, although abutting, is well to the south and behind the shopping center. The two uses are visually and physically separated and will not directly share vehicular access. Will the character of the zoning district change with this use? The use should not have any altering effect on the character of the district considering the predominant automotive service-oriented uses in the Pantops area. Will the use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance? C-1 districts are intended to permit selected retail sales, service and public use establishments which are primarily oriented to central business concentrations. The proposed use as a vehicle rental and maintenance facility is consistent with the uses allowed in such concentration of services. Will the use be in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district? By-right uses in C-1 districts tend to be retail and office in character. Those allowed under a special use permit are normally those which have the potential to generate more traffic or noise in the district. The proposed site is small and will be used as a U-Haul rental facility. It is not anticipated that this proposed use will generate more traffic or noise than would be in a typical retail establishment allowed by-right. Therefore, the proposed use is expected to be in harmony with uses that are allowed by-right. Will the use comply with the additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance? No regulations in Section 5.0 apply specifically to this site. Will the public health, safety and general welfare of the community be protected if the use is approved? The public health, safety, and general welfare of the community is protected through the special use permit process which assures that uses approved by special use permit are appropriate in the location requested. One of the concerns addressed in the review of this site has been the traffic flow into and around the site. Staff had initial concerns regarding the design of the ingress and egress of the site. Given the orientation of the entrance of the subject site to the curve in Newhouse Drive (a private road) and an alleyway serving the rear of Pantops Shopping Center, staff anticipated potential traffic conflicts. The initial design would have been confusing to drivers coming towards the site from Route 250. Without proper striping and signage, confused drivers may have entered the site mistakenly rather than continuing around the curve of Newhouse Drive into Pantops Shopping Center. Trucks exiting the site or the adjacent alleyway against such traffic could have been hazardous. Staff has worked with the applicant in solving this problem and the applicant has since added the appropriate striping and signage to the plan required for safe and convenient access to all the properties along Newhouse Drive. Since the site does not release traffic directly onto Route 250, customer traffic should have safe and immediate access without any problem. SUMMARY: Staff has identified the following factors, which are favorable to this request: 1. The ARB has expressed no objections to the use and has approved a Certificate of Appropriateness (Attachment D). 2. Facilitates infill development within the Development Area. 3. The site would use an existing internal road network, which would not further the increasing strip development along Route 250. Staff has identified the following factors, which are unfavorable to this request: 1. The Comprehensive Plan recommends that river oriented development be explored for the site's location. The proposed use does not meet this expectation. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of SP-02-10, SP-02-11 with the following conditions: 1. Vehicles shall not be elevated. 2. Vehicles shall be stored/displayed only in the areas indicated.,~lc~- ,~lov.,~2'~; ~ .... o.,~ ....... v,. ,~. *~.,~ vl,,. ~ ~- on the approved site plan. 3. The use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is approved by the ARB, including landscape and lighting site plans. 5. Provide vegetative screening in the area north and west of the biofilter, west of the dumpster, and west of the parking area to help screen the view from the road. An informal grouping of native screening trees and shrubs is appropriate. Staff recommends approval of SDP-02-22 with conditions. The Planning Department shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature until tentative final approvals for the following conditions have been obtained. The final site plan shall not be signed until the following conditions have been met: A landscape plan in conformance with Section 32.7.9 of the Zoning Ordinance which shall also reflect the following conditions from the ARB: a. Provide ornamental trees 40' on center, together with evergreen shrubs, along the eastern side of the parking lot. The height of the trucks and the location of parking areas should be taken into consideration when choosing appropriate species of trees and shrubs for this area. b. Replace the three trees in the central parking island with a species that is compatible with the other plants proposed on site. c. In the northeastern parking island, shift the Honey Locust slightly to the south to provide sufficient space for all plants. d. Continue the holly along the side of the building to the south corner. e. Substitute the white pine on the side of the building with an ornamental tree. f. In the biofilter: a) continue the Eastern Red Cedar past the Sweet Gum to the single Clethra; b) show the Inkberry and Clethra at mature growth; c) Cluster the Inkberry and Clethra in groups of 5s or 7s. 2. Provide standard water and sewer general plan notes on the cover sheet. 3. Provide plumbing fixture information for sizing the water meter. 4. Provide a note stating that a backflow prevention device is required on the domestic water service. 5. If approved, reference the SP numbers on the site plan and note all conditions of the SP's on the site plan. 6. An erosion control plan, narrative and computations. 7. A completed application and fee for erosion control and stormwater management. 8. A stormwater management/BMP plan and computations. Computations must include water quality, and detention routing for the 2yr and 10yr storms. 9. A completed stormwater management facilities maintenance agreement and fee. 10. Drainage computations. 11. Retaining wall plans and computations certified by a professional engineer for walls over 5 feet in height. ATTACHMENTS: A - Vicinity Map B - Tax Map (2 - Preliminary Site Plan D- ARB Letter dated 6/19/02 .... · '..'."'. . "I ' ~'~ "'. · .z .' ~ ...... '.. "' "' ...... ".'." " . '. " "" '..' · .'....-...' ,, '. ,~'. ci~ -.,'," ~ ~ i¢~ '..'. · '. ': : · ~' .'...'.'.'". '. · .... ' "' .' ....... · .:. . ..~. ~. . .._ ~ ;~ .~.~.. .. . .. . ..... ...:..... . . . : · · .. .... . . ,,~ . . ~. .~1~'~ ~" ~; ~ ~"~ i¢ ~ ....... · , ' " ' · .... ' ..... ~ · ": · ' .... ,.., .~ ~.~ ~ · ~ ~. .~ ,..~, .... ~ ~'~, ~u ............ i, ' ...... ' ..... · ...:.: ~..,~.~..o~¢~i~,-;~ ,~,.. ~-.' ~.~, .....· .... ." ... .' .; .......... ...... . ~." ~ ' ~U .," ~,. " . '' . '...' ',' ". .... '.."..". ..... '.';'.',' · · ..'.~'- ,..' : · · . ....... ~' ~'4. ~,r--'~.',x." ..~,'-"~.~,. ~','~.,r, .B~,~' ,,.-..'..*...¢,: .... ,'. :' ..... ~. · - · ............. ~ ........ · "' ' ':' ' """ '~'~1~'~. ~-~' ~; ~l~,l~' ~ ~ "~ ~;~';~' ~*r .'~a~ ~.._ib¢.~- ' · ¢. " . ' '" . ~ ' .'. i .' : ', .... ? ': "'.' ,' ~ -, .,.. , ...,, . . .... ~,-~. ~ ,..~., ......~., .... · . , :..:....,.- .. ~ ...... . ...... .. ..... . "' .' · ".: ". :: '.;.;,.~-:® ":..'-:'. '~: '. '~ '.,,:.. ~ '... o .'~ ' ' · :.'"....: .........-.': ...". ,.:... '...!:;;t...~.: '~."'..?,.i",'.: .' '~.:....'..:{'-.':.'.'.:.....":: .:ii"-',"::, . · ..' "'.Z"'" "'" -'.'..'.' . .... ' ":"- ": ..... " " '- ~ " ." ' ." '.":,.~'-:.' "" ". · ': ':'. '..:"}~":~: }' ~ ". "' · ",':.' -'./ . ~. .'~ I:1 · L "~. '5 ~'~ '":'"' '5' , . ~,,,, · ~ii~.:..:..... :... :~.~,,:~,..... · .¢~;i' · ". · ...: '.' .:~:. '.'... .. ..... '... · ~ .., ..' . . , . · ~;~.,~- . '.. . , .. · .'.~i~ ....' '-......" · ,..'.'. · ~i'~" . '.'..' ;,..' '-' '-.-".'" I ATTAC~T ID. · lig:. · ARB-2~02-~: ¥~!~tcle R~etal'& Malu~ena~e ~ .I.7,.' 2002: ~ ho~ ~ni~ly ~d 'a ~cata ~ A~~ms f~'~ ~qu~t..~ mfr. ~~fiv~ ~ ~ follow~g cabin,ns: ' ' : . . . ' 12 Pm~d~ om,~nml ~M 40' on C.~r,. ~ ~.~ s~b,~ ~0ng ~ ~a~ ~ o~'~ ~[lot[" ' '.. ~opimte s~ies, bf~;md ~bs for ~ m . . .' · 2, K~ ~ ~ .~s ~ ~e ce~ ~,~ ~'~lh a sp~ ~at is' 6v~h%k'~'the' ~r p~B }. ~ thc ~t~.p~'~.ghi~. ~ H~y ~ '~hgkfly m ~ ~o~ ~:W~e ~e i~I ~a~ lb[ ~ . pBnm. · ' ' ' · ' ' .: .. :.. ' 4,. · C~n~ ~ ~'iy along ~ si& 'of ~ ~g to ~'~ ~m~ ..... · · P~ ~a~d~'r~cd' ~ ~ ~ in~o~ioa a~s~ each of ~¢~ c~om at ~..~ troy, mca.. ~lu& a ~m ~i~ how ea~ c~ff'~ ~$ b~ aa~d. ff.~ v~'&~n &6~ .~quemd ~v~ been ~ i~fy ~os, ~qs ~ fh¢'~ al~, ~"~d~ m~eW 'of ~ i,~on ~yo~ ~Vc'~y qucs~m, pic'~e do. not ~simm to ¢,u~ct mc. Sin~. only, · :.hlbrgaccr M ~li~z,wsk/ ' De~i~-'?larmcr ' · . E'~ '" . August 1,2002 Richa~ H. Jones P O Box 5306 Charlottesville, VA 22905 RE: SP-2002-026 Guaranty Bank ATM Lane and SDP-2002-050 Guaranty Bank ATM Lane, Minor Amendment; Tax Map 61, Parcel 123F Dear Mr. Jones: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on July 30, 2002, by a vote of 5:0, recommended approval of the above-noted petitions to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: SP-2002-026 Guaranty Bank A TM Lane: 1. The permittee shall continue to provide one-way circulation with an unobstructed bypass lane that allows the safe passage of vehicles that do not enter the drive-though lanes. 2. The use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the ARB, including landscape and lighting plans. 3. One crape myrtle tree shall be added on the Rio Road side of the site to extend the existing row westward. 4. Shrubs shall be added along the frontage of Rio Road to match the existing plantings along Route 29. 5. The portion of the existing vertical wall element that extends above the canopy shall be eliminated. SDP-2002-050 Guaranty Bank A TM Lane, Minor Amendmenb Appropriate signage and pavement markings shall be provided in general accord with the improvements that are shown on the amended site plan, entitled Guaranty Bank ATM Lane Minor Site Plan Amendment, dated June 10, 2002. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on August 14, 2002 (SP-02-6 Only)_. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. Page 2 August 1,2002 If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Stephen Waller, AICP Senior Planner SW/jcf Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jack Kelsey Steve AIIshouse Guaranty Savings & Loan, F.A STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: STEPHEN WALLER JULY 30, 2002 AUGUST 7, 2002 SP 02-026 GUARANTY BANK ATM LANE SDP 02-050 GUARANTY BANK ATM LANE MINOR AMENDMENT ONE-WAY CIRCULATION MODIFICATION Applicant's Proposal: This proposal is for the expansion of a nonconforming drive-through teller window at an existing bank to allow a new lane for an automated teller machine (ATM). The new ATM would be installed below an addition to the existing canopy, as a replacement to a walk-up machine that is currently located inside the building (Attachment A). In addition to the structural changes that this proposal will require to the canopy and for creation of a pad for the ATM unit, the applicant is also proposing to change the travelway to a one-way circulation pattern. If approval is granted for the requested special use permit and a modification to allow one-way circulation, the Site Review Committee can grant administrative approval of a minor site plan amendment that is currently under review. Petition: The applicant's request is for a special use permit to allow the installation of a drive-through, automated teller machine [Section 24.2.2.13 ] in association with an existing bank, which is allowed by right (Attachment B). The property, described as Tax Map 61 - Parcel 123F, contains 0.839 acre, zoned HC, Highway Commercial and EC, Entrance Corridor (Attachment C). This site is located in the Rio Magisterial District at the intersection of Rio Road West (State Route 631) and Seminole Trail (U.S. Route 29), and is recommended for Regional Service in Neighborhood 1. RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed this proposal for conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and compliance with Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, and recommends approval of the special use permit with conditions. Plannin~ and Zonin~ History SDP 81-044 The Rio/29 Center - The original site plan allowing the construction of the Guaranty Bank building was approved in September of 1981. The building was constructed in 1984 with the existing drive-through window in its current condition. Because this site plan pre- dates the adoption of Section 24.2.2.13 (the applicable regulations requiring special use permit approval to allow drive-through windows), the bank's existing canopy is considered to be a nonconforming structure. Although use of the non-conforming canopy as a drive-through structure has gone on continuously since construction of the bank, Section 6.3 of the Zoning Ordinance only allows administrative approval for alterations to nonconforming structures under certain circumstances. This includes routine repairs and maintenance, and repairs or reconstruction to correct unsafe conditions or damages that result from factors that are beyond the control of the owner of a nonconforming structure. Therefore, the alterations being proposed for the installation of a 24- hour ATM cannot be considered among the changes that would be customarily allowed through administrative review, and the applicant is required to submit a petition for a special use permit. SDP 96-085 Guaranty Savings & Loan Minor Amendment - An amended site plan was approved administratively on August 15, 1996 to allow the realignment of several parking spaces for the installation of a raised planter at the front of the building. Character of the Area: This parcel is located on the north side of Rio Road West (State Route 631), at the intersection with U.S. Route 29, north of Charlottesville and across from Albemarle Square Shopping Center. In addition to the exiting bank, which is located within the Rio/29 commercial center this site is developed with a mixture of retail and office uses. Staff has recognized at least two other banks that have active drive-through windows with ATM machines that are located within close proximity to this site, one is located in the Gardens Shopping Center and the other is on one of the outparcels at Fashion Square Mall. Comprehensive Plan: Requests for special use permits within the Development Areas are assessed for conformity with the recommendations that are set forth in the Land Use Plan. In addition to being a use that is allowed by right in the HC zoning district, banks are also recognized as one of the typical primary uses in areas with a Regional Service land use designation. Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Plan, entitled Natural Resources and Cultural Assets sets the goals for preserving scenic resources that are recognized as being essential to the County's character, economic vitality and quality of life. The Entrance Corridor Overlay District is intended to further the County's efforts toward attaining the Comprehensive Plan objective for maintaining the visual integrity of all roadways. The Architectural Review Board (ARB) addresses potential adverse aesthetic impacts by applying various County standards for development within the Entrance Corridors. Because of its location within the Entrance Corridor, the ARB has reviewed the construction activity being proposed with this request for conformity with the County's adopted design guidelines, and recommends approval with conditions (Attachment D). STAFF COMMENT: Staff will address the issues of this request in two (2) sections: Section 24.2.2.13 - Drive-through windows associated with permitted uses; and, Section 4.12.6.1 - Safe and Convenient Access - One-way Circulation. 2 1. Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, Guaranty Bank has been at this site with its two existing drive-through lanes since 1984. The bank already has an existing ATM that requires users to park at the site and walk up for access. Therefore, staff does not believe that the proposed expansion of the drive-through canopy for the new ATM lane would impose any substantial detriment upon the adjacent properties. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby, This bank is located within an active commercial development and this request to allow the drive- through ATM is consistent with other banks that are located within the HC zoning district place and in the close proximity to this site. The Architectural Review Board has reviewed the proposed minor site plan amendment and the special use permit request to allow the ATM for its potential impact on the Entrance Corridor Overlay District, and recommends approval with conditions. Because ARB approval is also required for the architectural treatment of the canopy expansion, staff does not believe that any negative aesthetic impacts would result from the proposed development at this site. Therefore, staff finds that approval of this proposal would not result in change of character to the district. and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance, as set forth in Section 1.4, and identifies no conflict that would arise as a result of its approval. with the uses permitted by right in the district, Although approval of this special use permit is required for the expansion of the nonconforming drive-through, this request represents a use that is accessory to a financial institution, which is allowed by right within the Highway Commercial zoning district. Therefore, it is staff' s opinion that the proposed drive-through is in harmony with the by-right commercial uses located within this district. with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance, There are no additional regulations in Section 5.0 that specifically address banks that implement drive-through windows, automated teller machines and like facilities. and with the public health, safety and general welfare. 3 Due to concerns regarding access and circulation configurations, combined with the resultant high traffic volumes, new drive-through windows are only allowed by special use permit. Proposals to amend existing site plans are reviewed to ensure that the regulations for public health, safety and welfare are addressed adequately before any physical changes can be made on the site. Because there are two existing commercial entrances that allow adequate ingress and egress to this site, the Site Review Committee has identified no external safety concerns that would arise from the approval of this special use permit. However, during review of the originally submitted minor amendment, staff determined that the travel aisle widths could not accommodate a third drive-through lane for the ATM in the existing internal two-way travel configuration. Therefore, the applicant has followed staff' s recommendation to implement one-way circulation throughout the site and the removed the original southbound bypass lane that would have created conflicts between vehicles heading in opposite directions with the northbound drive-through lanes. Because of this, staff can identify no remaining concerns for public health, safety and welfare pertaining to this request. SUMMARY: Staff has identified the following factors, which are favorable to this request: The proposed changes to the by-pass lanes and travel direction would improve the site's internal traffic configuration. Approval of this special use permit would have the effect of bringing the bank's canopy structure and drive-through window into conformity with current zoning regulations. Because there is already an existing walk-up ATM machine at this site, staff does not anticipate a significant increase in traffic as a result of approving this request. The following factors are relevant to this consideration: The opportunity for 24-hour banking service provided by automated teller machines are often considered to be a standard function of banks and other financial institutions. The applicant's request indicates a belief that those services can be provided in a safer manner if ATM users are allowed to make transactions without leaving their cars. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff finds that this request generally complies with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, and recommends approval of SP 02-026 with the following condition: The permittee shall continue to provide one-way circulation with an unobstructed bypass lane that allows the safe passage of vehicles that do not enter the drive- though lanes. The use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the ARB, including landscape and lighting plans One crape myrtle tree shall be added on the Rio Road side of the site to extend the existing row westward. Shrubs shall be added along the frontage of Rio Road to match the existing plantings along Route 29. The portion of the existing vertical wall element that extends above the canopy shall be eliminated. o Staff will address the request for a modification to allow a one-way circulation configuration with consideration for the provisions set forth in Section 4.2. The applicant is requesting permission to provide one-way circulation through an existing parking lot and in lanes that will bypass the drive-through windows and ATM (Attachment E). Section 4.12.6.5 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that a minimum aisle width of 24 feet be provided for two-way travel lanes that are adjacent to 9-foot by 18-foot parking stalls. Section 4.12.6.2 of the Zoning Ordinance states, "One-way circulation aisles shall not be permitted, except that the Commission may approve one-way circulation in such case where the same is necessitated by the peculiar character of the site..." The travel aisle that extends through this site tapers to 17 feet and 6 inches wide at its narrowest point, and in cases where one-way circulation is being requested, the Department of Engineering and Public Works has generally required the implementation of travel aisles that are a minimum of 14 feet in width. Engineering staff has reviewed this request and the revised site plan amendment, which shows the installation of appropriate "Do Not Enter" and "Wrong Way" signs and "One-way" pavement markings, and recommends approval of the requested modification (Attachment F). Staff finds additional support for this proposal because it would allow the elimination the possibility for head-on conflicts that existed with the originally proposed two-way circulation configuration. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the modification to allow one-way circulation with the following condition: Appropriate signage and pavement markings shall be provided in general accord with the improvements that are shown on the amended site plan, entitled Guaranty Bank ATM Lane Minor Site Plan Amendment, dated June 6, 2002. ATTACHMENTS: B- C- D- E- F- Minor Site Plan Amendment Reduction Application and Request for Special Use Permit Tax Map/Vicinity Map Architectural Review Board Comments Applicant's Request for One-way Circulation Modification Engineering Department Review and Recommendation .! I I "County ~f Albemarle *:' . Department of Building Code a'e ATTACHMENT S' :- ' - ~- . : ,, d' - . _ '" L''. ~Application:for S.peci~ USePermit." :'"' ":'.' .. · - ' - ' . ~~~".. · ' . -.-- .... ., '_ ... .. ~.~ · ~ .. .... . . ~ .O~e ~ ~~ ~ ' you WL~ tL~:~ ~[~c~) · N..~o~.~~~s,~.~r~,i~.~,~..~.~.~,~ '. ... Add~es~ '" l~.ay ~gl.~'rhonc ( = ....... '). o~."Rio '~o'ad and ~t. 29N.. Does ta¢ 'owner of*l~i~ prolmay'i~wn (cc haveaay owne'~hip iai( cho~dtaXm~pandpmelaumbers_". ~r~ ....... '- · · :[-,]j:~.~].,],; I~ Spcntal U.~: PmpJ~.~; Q- C~um~n~ rca, ic, w ~F $i~ DDvd. cq]ln~41£ Iqa.n? ~1 M¢Inlire'Road -~ CharloLmsvii[¢, VA 22902 ·(owner abutting pr~p,.~?? It yds, pla~q Iist . . ...... ~ ...... ": .... ''. .... -- and P roI~-ex~: · ~N~ · Voice: 296-5S32 ~ Fax: 972-4126 · A'I'I'ACI;'I,M E NY B Application for SPecial ,'.Use Permit PmjectName: Gua~a_nty Book ATM Lane Date: April 22.2I~02 What is th~ comprehensive Plat~ desigaat-ioa for tiffs property? HC- I4i~way Commercial. Hm,~ will the prop0scd sp~ial use. affect adjacent property? 'l'hec¢ will be no affect on adj scent propc~'W. Italy will the proposed special use affect the character of the district surrotmding the property? Dfi,/e-thru lant.~ in' this district are very common - H~clce's restau_cant has one across l>do Road ~d 'Sun Trust has one across Rt. 29N.' The district surrounding .intezx,qive l~qe highway commercial' Y~ast food ~eslaurant, carw-out pit:m, retail, The ATM lane/maclab-re will be an imprbved service' ~o the patrons of the surrocmding busin~ses Il.ow is the'use'ia ha/~m~nY with the purpose and in~ent o~ ~be Zoning Ordin~ee? The zoning ordinanoe states that Highw'ay Commercial d2sedets be .established on m~jar highwz~ys wfth~ the urban ama,. 'Cruarahty' Itm~k ~xon~s on a ~rmjo~ highway .- RI. 29 North. The }lC district is imcmded J-hr sites with adxxlUate t'ron~ge and depth to permit c~ntrolled ace,s to public street*- The Guarzaay Bank site l~as controlled access to and fi~om Rio Road a~d Rt.. 29 North, .. ltow is the use in harmony with th~ Uses permitted by righ/in the district? Con¥¢n~encc stores, 5_~s_nci~l i~,titulions~ amd fast Ibod xestatur~s are ali pefmi[tL~ by fight in HC. Today. no fast £oort ~staarant or bank can £casibly be built W[~aut a 6five-thru la~e~ Drive-~tm lanes arc permi~l;ed in HC distt'icts by Special .Use Whal additional regulations provided in So, ion 5.0 af the Zoning Ordinauc~ apply to this use? No Supplemental Regutafic;ns app}7 to the proposed addilSoa of' aa ATM lane. ltow ~ill ~this me pr~mot¢ the p~blie health, safety, and general Wetl'are of the community? ATM flmchJnes have today Become an essential tool demanded by busy bank customers. Thc present ATM inackin~ at'this lobation requ[re~ ~usmmers to pm'k tkek cars, exit their vehicles, amd'fl~m enter a vasfibule wherfi the ATM is lat~led. ¢u~>mers must do hhis raining, sao~ag, ¢o~d. IJ~ ~cy"h~v~ a b~y or .small. et~ld h~ ~.cir v. ehie!e, they arc t'orced to leave them. almi¢ in the csx. "['his situation' ~s clearly not ooaveaient o.r sa~. Furthermore, customers are.concerned that they might become mi.pped ir~de the ~es~buJe and robbed~ w~th no w~,y of' escaping a cfimi~ml. A dedicated drive-thru ATM lane w'dt enable a c~tslomer to make a cash witbdxavcal without leaving the.safety at com?Brt of their own pri{,ate vehict¢. clearly, be a_n brkorove, me~t to ~.e b_ealth, safety, a}~c[ general welfare'or th~ ¢ommtmity which uses this popular bank location. 9 I I ATTACHMENT'B Describe your request ~n detail, and i~¢lude all'pcr~ne~i i~O~afion su~ ~s th~ ~.u~e~ of.pe~ -involVed in fl~e Use, ope~g, hour~ an~ any u~ique f~r~ of P~en'tly, there am ~ (2) ~ing ~ov~'-~ve~'teller 'label. fac~g~ ~e i~fion ~f R~, 29 Nor~..~d ~o' Ro~. Thc c~fing ~d~ of~e~ .~ 1~ pro~bi~s p~e~ of mad~e on .~ ~ive3's s~de of m apcrh~hihg' veh~gleJ ~em~m~ (~nty B~ .tuque'ars l~es; 'e~~ 2 .employee p~ng spa~',' The A'~ m~hime im~f ~ be set, ned by. fi~way, ~ ~g ~ be ~v~ded in ~ overhmd, c~opy' ~or s~ufity"~ p~o.ses.. The ~c pa[~m tl~ou~, the bank's ~¢~ng lot ~ isle. c[e~mees ~] .~ " .... ~l~e 'diS'v~ AT~.-ma~ine will-be.o~n f~ u~ 24 hours ~ ~y., 365 day, ' ~nt tig~s ~om h'e b~'s-A~ mc~e at Fomg [~m, app~oxmtety. 400 w~K.~ e~ed to me ~s se~ce_ · ".~e ~~ Bmk bulldog was buil't' ~ 1984 ~ h~ .~lwaT~ ~n used '~ ~ of~ee instance ~geney and ~ Wep~rat[o~ comp~y,'~ i~ ~m~ hea&u~s ~fil'~y 19972 In 'APfi}i ~9~, Qd~o[~e a~".Vir~a ~d ~e ~. building, '~p.t ~br ~e..braneh .. Ofi~ devel~om~I .p~s by: Caleb ~Owe. A~soqi~tc.s pr0~ a mix ~f ~1 square ~et neefiing 1 sp~ per 100 ~t; ~d 3,491 sf of net renmbl'e ~1 . u~ bff.com~ci~ offi~ ~eq~es 1 .spa~ per 200 sf: o~' [xet teazle ~l~mm feet, or .~3 parkk~g · .~c P~g Pt~ ~y Wy~t A~mcimes ~ates t~ 48 pa~{~, sp~' 'wo~d . s~te ~d a tom[ of 67 s~ces ~o~d be ~ow~ per ~e len~s of a Cpop~atavu P~ng= · A~eeme~;' The~ ~ md~7 ~'m~ of 49 ~king spaces on !his p~.L. The propos~ A~ lane ~1 re~re fl~ ~om[ of~o 9mployee p~k~g. ~e.s, [e~ a ~oml. of 47 ~a~s. Under ~c cu~ent m~ng o~e, pa~ng f~ comm.erci~ o~ce ~e xc~ui~m o~y 43 spae~q, ~m remeval o~'2 s~ ~]l l~ve ~e ba~ wifl~ 4 exUa spa~s. ~s~mrs'~d. renmm ~e ~tifled to ~mk on &e ~ a{oiaiag p~Is.&~e[ 6t-123B [~O). ~r~g to the ~s of a "Park~g ~d Aec.ess .A~eeme~" dated Noveni~. 1.6, {983 ~d r~'oMed ~ Ge Cl~k~s O~ce of the. Cimuit ~ 'of ~bm~le'C~V, De~ Boo~ 7¢2, · ' .Page 375, ~8 A~eemcmt ~ a~ac~d ~o ~d ~e a pa~ o~ th~s' ~ppli~fiom~ Age,mint.win ~nded on J~e 14, 1996 ~ereby ~ o~ of fie adj'oM~ t~ p~l 61- r~0rdefl M the'C.le~'s Offi~.'of' [~ Cimfii~ ~o~ of. Al b~[e. Counv,.D~ Book 1.,~46, l~ge 4~. '~s De~ of Rele~o is attached to ~d made a ~ ¢f~s app[icaffom ..... A1-rAOHMENT B Describe your 1/eque,st in'detail and include alt pertinent information such as the numbers o: l~r~ons involve, d in th= usc, operating hours, and any unique features of tb~ use: ATYAcHMENTs REQUIRED'- provide two(l) caples of each: '- ~ t. ·Recorded plat or bound~ su~ey of t~ property mque~d for ~he ~ning~' If'~ere is no r~corfled plat or ~und~ s~ey, plea~ pmvi~ leg~ description of ~ pm~y and ~c D~ Book and page n~ or Plat Boo~ ~d p~ge number. : · Note: .If you are requexying a special'use permit only for a portion of t~e property, it n~s. to be'd~cr~bed or delineat~ 0n a copy of lbo plat or'su~yed ~awing. Ownership info--on - If own, mhip of ~e prope~y is in t~ ~ of any ty~ of entity or Organization including, but not fi~ted to, the name cfa co~oraion, p~mhip · or ~sociacion, or in the n~e of a ~ust, or in a fmtifious n~ei a doeum~n.t a~pmble · e County must be sub~t~ ~ing ~t'the penun signing below has me au~ofity t~ do so. ]if the applicant is ~. contract purchasei:, a documeni acceptable 'to tho County mu~t he · · .~ubmitted containing the owner's writtgn consent to the application, if the applicant is the ~gent of the owner, ~ documen~t aoog, ptaNe £a the County must be Submitted ttiat i~ evidence of fl~e existence and scope of the agency: OPTtONOL ATTACHMENTS; '~ 3, Drawings or ~ae'eptual plans, if any, ~ 4, Additional Information, i]f ~y.' · · I'h~y ~ tMt I own the subj~t p~p~y, or ~ve the·legal power ~ ~t on.behalf 6f.~e owner in filing thi~ ~plicatiom I also ~eaify'~at the info~a~a pmvid~ ~s uae ~d ~u~e tO ~e best of my knowledge. signature Printed Name Daytime pho'ne number of Signatory ApFi.). 22, 2002 I I ATTACHMENT B County of' A]belnarle Dcparm-J. cnt of Build~g Code and Zoning Services 40 [ Mclr~are Road. · C.~lottcsvillc, VA 22902 To Wh~m iL May Concern: ,, " .. Ptl~-pO~e oF (t',i.s [eLCel-JS to adthor~7~ O~ ~n't, ~6~ ~.' ,tones to ~l oa' ~f. bf · (ktar'~ty Bm~k 'k~r ~1 mat~s relkt~g to ~ app}i~tioo, for'.a, speci~, rosa permit ~d siB'. P.res klent mid :/ FASH I N QUARF MA ATTACH~ENT'C ~?,!'" 'C) t // SP - 2002- 026. GUAKANTY BANK, ATM LANE INCH = 2JO0 FEET 13 I I I A'CfACI:JME NT O Richard 'H. ·Jones. · P O. litox ,5306 .' Charrotte~vilJe. VA 229135 'R~:. ARB-2002-067 Guaranty- Ba~k ATM . 'Tm 'Map 61 r .Farc,~' 12~F Mr. The'Arbemarre County Architeciurai Review Board rovJewed the above n~H:['-Jtem al' its. meeifng on'. Monday, July 15, 2002. RegardJng the req'uesl~ for the Specral Use Berr~it, the .B~ari~.axpr~sC. ed..jio' -. objec~io.~ :~ .fl"~e propose'd u~'. '~ubject to th~ .thnee con~it[en~ r~commebdeO bY'sial'and subj~ [~o a' fo.urt.h condftr6n,' aa.f~li0w~; ' .. '-... · 'I.. ~'ne .us~'C, ha[l' ;n~ ¢Omme~:~ until a cer[[ficat~"cd"Al~l~'rop?i,a, ter~e~;~ 'rs I,s~ed.by'the 'AR.B, in~t~dlr~Lg ""' lands'ca'pa and lighting ¢lan~." ' .. ':: . · '. - · .. ' 2, Add one'"cfape myrtletre~ ~nthe Rio Road sfde ofthesf~:e~o exte~e exJ~ing.teww~lW,~rd, .." ' " 3, 'Add ~hruba along the ,~io Road frontage ~'match the exJsfJng planting along Rbu~ 2,9. ·. 4. -~e portioh of the ;existing ver[Jc~J Wail erement that e-~tends'aSove 6he canopy-~haJi be elfmin~fed, .Regarding the aJte prat't, the Beard voted td grant approval of ~ Certificate of A~preprJeteness'. su§iect fo' the ~rlo~frrg c~ndi~fons ~ b~e approved admfnfotrat~oly by s~ ' · ' 1. Add One mapo royale ~ee on fha Rio Road ~tde oF'~e s~¢ to e~tend the exl¢~ng.,~ we~r~, · ' . 2. 'Add'ehrubs.aJong the RJo Road kon~e ~ match tho ex¢~[~ng pl~tingalong Route 2D. ' 3, PmgMe'cut.ah~ on ~e pmpo~ed ~essed down I~h~, 4. lhe'p~On of the ~l~tin~ ~fca[ wa~r elem~t'~at e~s above the ~p'opy ehalr be eliminated, ple~e pmvlde.revlaeC dryings ur o~er iafo~atfon aOdres,~B e~'~ ~'~'~d~ii'ens at ~ur ~rlies~" ':" ~nvenlence, f~ude a me~o indi~ng how ea~ co~ditfon' h~' 5eon ~atis~od:'.ff change~ o~er ~an. .:'"'" ': ~ revues[ed have been made, [denti~ ~hose ch~g~ in Se memo area. When s~s ~n~rma~ mdl~s ~at all COndJt~ns ~ a~ro~:ha~ b~h'met, e'O~iff~ of ~pmpria~ness may' ~e ~s~d. .' If~u ~e any ~uestg¢~, proase de Bat hesJ~te'to ~ct me, S~nc~rely,' ... .'..:....... Ma~aret Mat)szew~ki Design Planner ' A'I'TACHM ENT l~ June 14, 20i32 · '"' ' County of'gJbcmarlc · ' '.:. Al.bea~arle County P. laiming Cornmis~ian '~;~":: Chadvktc--sville, VA 22902-4596 SDP-2002-050 Guaranty Ba~k ATM' L~e Mkr~oi: Amendment S P-2002-026 Cmarant~ Bank: ATM Laac Special Use ~ait To The Pla~ aing Commission: We are requesting a waiver of Sections 4.12.6.1, "8a2i: and Convenient Accel," and 4.t2.6'.2, "~temal Ctrcalat~r¢ oft_he All:c-marie County Zot~jttg Ot,4;paaqe ~d reque~ii~'.that one way ~ to and cff~nlafion ~mu~ the parcel be The Albemarle County De~elepmcnt Depat~aent~ of'E~gineering ~d pt~ning are tec~ratr~mdiug st~h one~ ~-ay tragic dne to the Pact ~at. some o£.~h'e'p~ese~t · travel lanes am lek~ than the rtXl~red 24' for twa-vray traffic and to mirtimi~e 'traffic conflicts Wl~ch may result'from' t~ stocking 0fyehicles in the drive-thru Rie 'hard IL. Jones · Age~'[ for (~tmrffaty Bank Co: Rick Funk, dBF Associates Amt]itects Rod Gxmtrg, Ouar~ty Bank I I A'rrACHMENT F C-uarB~ty Bank ATM Lane Minor· re~isic)n 2 · .Albemade County Development Departments' SPIN Submission and Comment En. gineeri'ng ~ plan and waJv~ reviewer received re¥1ewo Stewart Snerl 6/'18102 ?/1/02 appnoved DATE: o I July.2gD2 RE:U qG'uaranty Bank ATM Lane, SBP-2OD2-050 The site plan amertdmen~ for Guaranty. Bank ATM Lane received on 18 July 2002' has been revfewed. The Engineer[ag Deparb-nent 'Will recommend appmvar of the gf~e plan amendment wffh ~k,e f[~l[ow~ng .conditions: · · 1. A "one..wJa:¢ waNer must be approved f~r ~his site plan amendment. Please c~ me if ~u have q~s. RE;~ uGua~n~ Bank.AT~ ~ne, MfnorAmendment One~y. Ci~ra~n Wa~r The request bra One-way' olrcuJa~ion waiver-~m' ti~e plan received 18 June 2002 has.been re~feWed: · Trio one-way clrcufatbn rs proposed along the Sobrthwe..,~t ~nd' souiheast Iz'avelways emu'nd'the ec<isting bu]dbg. The travelS'ay varies In wid~ from 17-feel to 22-f-ee~ wilt] 2 exl.~tfrtg' drive-thru lanes and one . addition a[ proposed drive-thru Jane. The existing driVe-thru egresses e~ainst oncoming 'maffic from ~ no~emm~ en~anc¢~el~y.. The exis~g dri~-~ vehJ~ee ~c~ wffhb ~e ~mmost [ravJ~y. The'~s~'ng '~nm'ost · E~el ~.~d~ vaH~ fr~m '17-f~to 21-~et Wide with an ~ance ~ 18-fe~ ~de. C~ ~un~ stan.dards ~uire a 24-f~t t~fway a~ entmnce'~d~ ~r ~wey. tr~er.'A new d~e~ru la~ wilJ c~se add,tone[ ~'bCe .sta'~ ng within ~e ~ve~ and an in~8 In m's~o~ t~ ~en. e~lting ~e.dri~u (4~ vehicres p~ ~k s~d on ~pl~on). When ~n~dedng na~w tmv~y~.along ~ ~he vehlcb s~cki~.and crossover ~fflc, 'a enemy ~ pa~cm ~uld help alienS' unsafe end inconvenient ~h]~e circulation .~use8 by ~rC~ra~n ~1~ 81~ eliminate any ~osg[ble ~poi~t M-~ms within ~e site ~rom dri~ru p~ons usi~ · e.e~st ng ~r~hemm~t Traffic citcula(ion conceJ-ns are addressed with proper signege and pa'~eme~t markinl~s aC show~ ~n the sJ~e plan amendment. Based on the revie~ above, engJn'eer]nB recommends approva~ of ~he one-~y.ciroulaJ[on ~elve[, PJea~4~ 6o~]tftct me ~f yau..h~ve gues.tiof~s c~ require acldittonal informa[ion, 08:29 Pag~ 1'of 1 16' August 1,2002 Alton L. Carver 195 Riverbend Drive P O Box 8147 Charlottesville, VA 22906 RE: SP-2002-027 Kia Dearlership; Tax Map 78, Parcel 9 Dear Mr. Carver: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on July 30, 2002, by a vote of 5:0, recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Vehicles shall not be elevated. 2. Vehicles shall be displayed only in the areas indicated for display as shown on the site plan. 3. The use shall not commence prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Architectural Review Board. This shall include approval of landscaping and lighting plans. 4. In addition to the landscaping required by condition three, the applicant shall provide trees along the interior drive 40' on center, 2 %" caliper, at the bottom of the slope. Provide a mix of screening trees, screening shrubs, and ornamental trees throughout the slopes to soften its appearance. 5. The open rip-rap channel shall be changed to a sub-surface pipe to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department. 6. The storm water BMP facility will be designed as a recreational amenity compatible with the adjacent residential development. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on August 14, 2002. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Stephen Waller, AICP Senior Planner SW/jcf Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jack Kelsey Steve AIIshouse STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: STEPHEN WALLER JULY 30, 2002 AUGUST 7, 2002 SP 02-027 KIA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP - OUTDOOR STORAGE AND DISPLAY Applicant's Proposal: This proposal is for the establishment of an automobile dealership, which would utilize a portion of an existing 5,549 square foot building as an office and showroom, along with a 2,730 square foot building addition with four bays for service and maintenance, and a parking lot expansion Attachment A). The Site Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary site plan showing the site layout for compliance with Section 32 of the Zoning Ordinance and can grant administrative approval of if the required special use permit is approved (Attachment B). Petition: The applicant's request is for a special use permit to allow outdoor storage and display in the Entrance Corridor Overlay District [Section 30.6.3.2], as an accessory use to the automobile dealership, which is allowed by right (motor vehicle sales). This site consists of a 1.7 acre portion of the parcel recognized as Tax Map 78 - Parcel 9, which contains approximately total 18.8 acres, zoned Highway Commercial (HC) and Entrance Corridor (EC). This property is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District on State Route 250 East (Richmond Road), approximately 1/3 mile east of the intersection with State Route 20 (Stoney Point Road). The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Regional Service in Urban Neighborhood 3. Character of the Area: The subject parcel is the former site of a restaurant and all adjacent properties are developed with commercial uses. Free Bridge Auto Sales is located on the adjacent parcel to the east and several other automobile dealerships are located south and west of the site on nearby properties along Route 250. A motel is located immediately to the west of this site, on the same parcel that is subject to this request. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this proposal for conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, compliance with Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, and with consideration for Architectural Review Board comments, and recommends approval of the special use permits with conditions. Planning and Zonin~ History: The existing building on this site was constructed more than forty years ago. There is no site plan on record for the site being proposed for this use. An existing motel is located on another portion of the parcel. SDP 00-032 Free Brid;~e Auto Sales - At it's meeting on August 16, 2000, the Board of Supervisors granted approval of a special use permit for the expansion of another outdoor storage and display area onto a 1.132 acre portion of this property, which was later combined with the adjacent property (Tax Map 7S-Parcel 57B). Comprehensive Plan: Requests for special use permits within the Developments Areas are assessed for conformity with the recommendations that are set forth in the Land Use Plan. Auto dealers are listed as one of the several types of primary uses identified for Regional Service Areas under Table 1 of the Land Use Plan, entitled Land Use Guidelines. Those guidelines also recommend the implementation of proper screening for uses implementing outdoor areas for storage and display of merchandise. Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Plan, entitled Natural Resources and Cultural Assets sets the goals for preserving scenic resources that are recognized as being essential to the County's character, economic vitality and quality of life. The Entrance Corridor Overlay District is intended to further the County's efforts toward attaining the Comprehensive Plan objective for maintaining the visual integrity of all roadways. The Architectural Review Board (ARB) addresses potential adverse aesthetic impacts by applying the County's various standards for development within the Entrance Corridors. The ARB has reviewed the request and the proposed landscape plan for conformance with the County's adopted design guidelines, and recommends approval with conditions (Attachment D). STAFF COMMENT: 1. Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, Staff has identified no detriment to the adjacent properties that would result from the approval of this proposal to allow the outdoor storage and display of motor vehicles. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby, In addition to the automobile dealerships located on the adjacent parcel to the east, there are several others with outdoor storage and display areas located on the opposite side of Route 250, and within the immediate area surrounding this site. The Architectural Review Board has reviewed this request to allow the outdoor storage and display of vehicles for its potential impact on the Entrance Corridor Overlay District and recommended approval with conditions. Because ARB approval is required for the proposed outdoor display areas as well as the architectural treatment of the building addition, staff does not believe the district would sustain any negative aesthetic impacts as a result of the proposed development of this site. Therefore, staff finds that approval of this proposal would not result in change of character to the district. 2 and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, Staff has reviewed this proposal for compliance with the purpose and intent as set forth in Section 1.4 of the Zoning Ordinance and identified no conflict that would arise from the approval of the special use permit. According to Section 30.6 of the Zoning ordinance, the intent of the Entrance Corridor Overlay District is, in part, to ensure a quality of development that is compatible with the county's important scenic, architectural and cultural resources through the architectural control of development. The Architectural Review Board has applied the County's adopted guidelines for development within the Entrance Corridor to the review of this request to allow outdoor storage and display and recommended approval of the special use permit. with the uses permitted by right in the district, Although a on this site, right within special use permit is required for the proposed areas of outdoor storage and display this request is for an accessory use to motor vehicle sales, which is already allowed by the Highway Commercial (HC) zoning district. with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance, Staff has recognized no additional regulations set forth in Section 5.0 that specifically address automobile sales or outdoor storage and display. and with the public health, safety and general welfare. The special use permit that has been requested is directly related to the potential for imposing adverse aesthetic impacts upon the Entrance Corridor. The Site Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for compliance with the relevant development review regulations that are set forth in order protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Therefore, it is staff' s opinion that a combination of proper site design and implementation of the recommended conditions along with the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the ARB could assist in ensuring that the proposed development does not conflict with this particular concern for special use permits. SUMMARY: Staff has identified the following factors, which are favorable to this request: Motor vehicle sales is a by-right use in the Highway Commercial District; and, The Architectural Review Board has reviewed the request to allow outdoor storage and display and recommends approval with conditions. The following factors are relevant to this consideration: There are several automobile dealerships in close proximity to this site; and, This proposal represents the redevelopment of an existing building on a parcel that is not currently being used. 3 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval of this special use permit, with the following conditions: Vehicles shall not be elevated. Vehicles shall be displayed only in the areas indicated for display as shown on the site plan. The use shall not commence prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Architectural Review Board. This shall include approval of landscaping and lighting plans. The applicant shall provide trees along the interior drive 40' on center, 2 caliper, at the bottom of the slope. Provide a mix of screening trees, screening shrubs, and ornamental trees throughout the slopes to soften its appearance. ATTACHMENTS: B- C- D- Site Plan Reduction Special Use Permit Application Vicinity/Tax Map Architectural Review Board Special Use Permit Recommendations .~-.. ",4.::,.,~..~.~1 ~F.~:~.- ~F'J~I ' ~0~ .... . .~ ~.~ ~ ~'.. .L . ..'." ' ' ': ' ' 'F , ... · ' · · .: :....%~-. .... ..<.:.. ~ · ~:~ ~ .. .: . · .'~ .'.' ...... ~lh' ".'*~', ,"' :' ' "~ '~ '. " '.:'. v. ..' "~' .... ~... :' .>% . ~'~' .. .. .. ....... .,. ...... %.....'... · ..: · . .... . : · ~ : '... ~ %.... ':,,,..'... · · . '.V .. :..'. :. · - eL~ '~ · " ,~' · .. ' ' '. ". ]' .. .',,f .- . .~ '... ~.... . ,~. ...... . .~'' . · ..~. -?.}.. . .....~ ... . .... . .'.'......... :.. .. ..-:=. :~ ~ .': .~ -: ......... .-: '.~, ,.. ...... . . .'. · .. -. .. .......... .......: .....:. · ' :..~.'"-" ..~L:'. '.':. '.....-' · ~ · '. '. -'' .. ' .':." '.-..-' ':'..''.- :. ...':: ~,,~ ,:.':]' ~ .' . . :,'.' j.~:~ :.:.: :.' ,:~. .. :;j*~'.:~.'. ,.~ ~. ';' ?' :"' "" "' ' · '"','.:./',. -' F"' ,¥'~" I'::~ : .... . .::? :,'~.',.,. /',: '.~' ' . ~ . % .... ' ' ~ ~. · ~ ' ~, ' ~ .~'. ' ~ .I ~ ~ ~ II/I . ~ . · · ~ . ' ' - ...... ' J ~.':., ' .x~. :~. :,.' x./.x/;/..,//:' [/~ '; ~'~.::~D~I~'/~~ I[J' ~',1 i~'-L~'~~ '~ ~-~3i ''-. :~ ~ ..... "~"~..-4/'~F-('7 .:' · · ' . . ' ~ . 'l ' ' ~%~ ~ ~1' I I iI'' ' ~ ' ':.~eq' ' ' ' ~ ' ? ' '.".'"L,"'.~"'> ~'....,,/..,//,.Ir..~:.,~,~;./ ~, :~il~,~,~,~,,~:; ~ ~.~ ~~,,,..,....... ,' ..~--~.,r,/~.~,,, ~.. · ~-.:'.~-".~::.:';.'~ .~>' '~..~"."/.."..'~."~.///~,'~,~'1 ~'~: ~',~?.,~,',',",,.~",.'~', ,. ':~~'-~-~.~/.~;~'; · ...-?.'.'.>..,';.:~>..'~::::.;~...'? .,.,.~ ,,.~[~',,, ',~ ,~ ~ ~.,..'.,~'.~'~"..~,,,.',.:..;~..,.~,,. ~~', :'J;~,.J'~_ ~-'.. ~.,r;/.~' ~ .,, ,' ~ ,,~.~:.~ ? x"'.;,.?'; ;'" ,~ .. ~,~ ~.'~,,. ~ ,, ',.",~ ,,,~ .(',~'~S",',',~~rr~,,':.,~. .. "'.~ ~.~'~ ~.'>~ ' · '.,~ ~,'.!~ .,~ .... .-; ~'~'.~.',, ;;~'~,~:~.~..:~.,;.-,.;~:,'.~..~~ ~; ~;'~ ~.'.~- . ,,..~,.. ~,,, ,,..~ ,.....~.,,~ .,, ~., ~.,~..; -',.~'...~. :-~.~.~~~' ~~~', .~'~/~' . . ,".,",,',,'~.~",,'.~'~. ,.."~,~""~,. '. ~"""~r~ '~ ~'~~ ~'. ~'~?~ ~ 7 ~ '~' :.. ,.......~...., .. ~.. ... .. ~ ~..~:..~.~ .. .~. ~. . .,.,, · .... ~ ,. .,,, ,.~ ....... ~ .~ : , · .. ~..,.,...., .., ,,,...- :.;/.:~., ,'..~ : . .~. : - '~ ~" ~ ~ ',. ~.' ·, t r ~. ~';, ~,'~'~~ ....... '. ~ ~.~ ~ .'/?.~ ~ ,.'- · ' . .~ i · .~' ;.:~-.~"~.'~ ~[.'~, .~.'~-.~ ' .. ~:. ,.~: ~ ,. ~ ~.;: ~ .~.,,;.: :,:..,~., ,.:.,,~',~,,.., ...... ~" ~ ..~ ~ ~--'~,. ~,.. ,.; :- ~,, ,.., , ,..~;~;..,..,~,'~t~ ~. _~? / . · -,,. '.~? ~,';~;~,,"~./~,' ~ ~'~'~'~ ;~'~/~ ~/J;1~" ' · . ~. '...'/........ ~ ~it.':;".'.~:.' ~~LFFF ~-'.~:': '. · ' ~".. /~ .; ~ ,:'~,¥,',:. t:. ,~~ ~.,~.~'~' " /~ '~-.-~; ~ .... :. : ~...~ ~ ~ .~ ~:r..'/;;./:~.;/.... ~.'~ :; "' '~ ~ . n .... · ...... .:~ . . ~ ,. ,; ~,~/~ .; ,.....,,.;., ..... /.:~/:. ~:/~ . ~: . ...... ...~ .... .~ ,. - ;? ~. ....... ....... I, ~ ~,.~/~/~:.,~.~ ...... ,/~,,/.~ ~r~/,,, ! ~. .~ . ..... ,.,, ....... ,~ ..... . ,..~' .. :/j~ ~ . ~ · ~,',~,,~.:,/~/ ~,~'.,,.~,,,'.:::::/~:~:~.~//~.,,.~.,,.,,:,;,'~:'~ ~.',',,~,,...~,., ~ · .... ~. ,~..,,,,,~ ....... .~;~/.~. . . ...?.. ~..,..,, /, ...?~/,,? .'~.~/~,,~:,~.~'/.,~/'~,'/~:'~,,,,.,~.~.,.~,...,~' .... ;~,...; ..-.;(,,:,:?,,~L......<~,~ ,._..... .' .. . .' '.'...." ~. - ' .: I I~??IL...~ ..t~JJ.~;'~.'t.l~i :. :. '."/../..~ .. :~ I ~. · '.... ." " ......... ~..'~ '...~.~.},'~" .:./ :. ... ' ~." · '. .. .... .' "/' :';~"~'~ ~.~'~.~':~ ~' ~ '1.'~ ~'. · · ' .......... -'-.' ....... '~":~-"~' '~ · ' . .. ~ - ~ ~ ~ ;~. . ~ . . . · ~ .... ._~ . ~ ~ ~. . . .. ~.:.-...... ;. ~..~'.. ~..~.:.~ ~ · I.u.. ....'....:.?. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: '. . · . .. ... .... ..:... ..... - ..... ~ ~..' ..~ ..' ... .- .... /':" ~: ,~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~; ,' ,' ~ , : ~ ', '.. '. ', '% '..''-..~'-'. ............. -, ~ Li~' · '; ' ;.. . .~. .... .~.. ~.,,,,~/~,~.~.,~;,,~,.~ ,~ ~.~ .......... . ..... ~:.: ............... T,....._., . ':'.;.:.~'-.. ')~ ./.~'/t' ~..'~." , ~: ~' ~: ~ '.~, · ', ',-.' .~j--:Z:;.; 3;.z .... ~'~ :~"'~- ~'' ~ . '~ ' .. ;.,.._~,..;..,.., ,.. ~. ,~:" ~1 ~:.,.. ~,~,. .... .,_.. ........... -~., :~,~ :.'~'?~ ..... . ....,,~;-._..,..,;~;~....~,~'~,:.,., .... ..~,.,~... ..... . .............. ....... .... ......~,...~,...... .. -.-....~ ..... .: ;.~. ,/: ..~ I~.~L:.~ ~,~.~ ~., ~.., ~.. ..... - ........ ..: ..... .--...-.~,~.,~. ~ ,~ . .---- · . '..' i" "::Y..'---'-<.' ';.',; ~'~'~,~tt~':'.~:.',~ .n,.-.. ,.,, '~ .. ...... · .......... ..--.-. 7-- · .;.-..,:.... ....... L~. '.: ...... · . .. : ..; , .... ]~ . . · . ... .... · . . ..... /. ~..' . · ,. : · ...~.~.~.'. . . . .. . : ....... .~..'...' .... . · .... . . · ~..~ :. ~? '.. . . .. · .... :.: . .. . · . . %~'. ~ . . · . .. .. '...... : ~ .". ..... ~ · , .. .. .-. : .' . .-.~ .: .-] .. ".~. .' '~ .... :.". .~' · i · ,' · ,~lj · · .' ·., ... ', _.'% ,.. · ' :. · :. ~.. ....'..,' .',' .- :=~ :' , .:!'~..'.."-'. ~..~ .. .... .--...-' ..' I~ ./,.., .',~Ji"~:.' ,-"/' ,."'. / ~.,',' ,?'. .... '...':'.;'~ ~'... "",,'~:%." / ~'" ,... .... ,,-':'.'ll~,l'~~=J[-" ~ ~1" ~'i~=,,~l~l!" ,., ,- -.,-._-. ~...~,, ~'...,~.?~,~,~ ...... .~,,~,~, ...." · ..... ..- ,-. ..,..,.~.dr~:.?-~ .~-:~.~, ..' ,.' '.'. · ~,'~ '~ .,",'M./ '.."./..' .... =' .<~t.,':~ · .' 4'. ..' · :" .--' . 1.1'. .... '~' ,.. '-~'~.~l~ ,.' .-~..,..;-'.,-..~.. ,.:..'};'~.:v.-~.;,, ,,' .....~; .> .;, .,' ..,-:..,,'- J.. ~ ~'~.:.,'-~'.... ,_.r~[.~.,. "-" " .... ' ~' -~ ..'"'/',~.~'~'/' ,'.,~' · .... '"': .~,~ "". ,' "' '-'~' ,'"'. ..... ~ '.' ~' '~ ~ ~ '~." ~1~':~ ,~ ,.~ ,.' ' , '. 0'~ ~:' ,~ ', ~.~"~.'~'. "' . '-- ' / .'.' ~' . ,'."..~ ' .~ ..'."'.'.'.' -.. .. .~-- ' ' ' ' ' -. ,,. -,-..,- ~.~. ~-E ...... · . .'x~-,,.~i.... . ,.,., ,.:- ,,,... .... .. ~:, ,.... ~ · .~ '-' .. / , ~,- .- , ,T,=./'.','. ' / .' %1.'¥' :' . ,' ,": ' ..... . ~I " ' · '-~ · .~ ,- ..' .. - .q .' ~. · / .:/.'"".4 - · ..... . .' · ~ ~ , 2 2 ',' ~ · i'..r, ..... " ...-". ;~ '~' · ' ~..' '. .~Z-~=~/ · ..~l' - .~ :' · . = = .'. '. · -I :'. ' .,'., , '- I.-'.-.' -'.~.. ,.. '--"' ""' ""'" '" "" [" ": "" '/',' "" ""."'" '.'"'. '.'.'"' i , '~- £"i:' .~' ~ ~' ~ ~' "i ....... '..1 . ..' '. ~, ....... :./ '~'"~ '(.,/: ,-,". . · . ' . ...... - . . .. · . j~-,,,'.,,'.,-,,', ','.' :.- ', ~.Ug~" ?.;,, ;,.,.r~ '= · ~' ,,' :, .,4'. ,-' .'L,',. ;- ,. ,..'."...'..... .' . .' . · x:_~ ~- ...... . . ~. .~., ~ · ~...'/~.,:.- ~ · ..... ~ ...... .'"' ,.' ',",-' ,'.~ '~" Y~.'. ' /~".\ ' ~" ~"' /~';.~.~ '/..," ~d ," ,, -- "~".. ;_'~,=~ ~-.:.--:' .~ ~' *,~ Mm ' ..... ~....'-. ~.~...,'/',,.'/',,.'..~'.-~':~'/ ..'~ .~ .,~'~.. /,'/~."!_~; ,:.,..'~' ¥: ;~.~,.;'~ '...1'..:. f~J~'~ ~ ' ~'[:~ ~' -."~-~.-"..'-",-", ...... ':!'2" .:. ~.< 2'~ " .' E .1.,'//.:' .-x ..'. ,~..,.: X~..%:4~, ., "." .. · .~*,. ~' ~, ~','- '. "':~.9 ?J ',t,- ,: .." .'- '//,~,'~ .~.x. '.. z~'/,'-:,!?.,-..:'._"~,'~"~ ~"ll'J~-/4' ',.;'. ' ' , .'. '," ',,~ -.~ · '"i' '? · '7 "- .'/' ~' ~.,'".'~.~.~' .- ~~?~t,.. '~ · · ....,,. ~..r~.., ~,. ~, ..,; .... '~' .,' /~.':'W... YJ:t~/:]~,., ,,;.-~z ',~. ~.. ~-.. .~ [.,~, ~ /.: '.../-' '"' i:.: ...' -" .... "' ~~?~ : : ~ L-T~.~.LNtI: ~. ' ' · ' .' ' ~', ...,'.'.~1-- ~.~-. ...... ·~~.~'". ~JL. tlu'~. ~ · .,,.' · . ." ..'. ::.', .'...' ,.. '.'"".'. ':... · ..... ...:..........., .... . .......: · -~/~ ~ · ../. ~_/' · /..- · · .. .,~*,-~.}~. ~.,~ . · , ~'-~' , ~ ..... ... t ' ..: · · . ~'~' ~ -- / ..... 4-- r' ..-- ~ .... , .... - .. . . .. : , ., .. ..i. ~,., .. · , , ,' z .' ,.~ ~.--'- · '~. "... · '~ . ~ '.. I' Ak.~ . I~?--'W--. ~ .... [ , j , ~.. ' , ' · '...'.' · %.~ ~ .' · ~ .... - - .~, .. ~.?,~,.,~,:.g,~,e , .. . · ,. · '... .-. · ,~,....... .... _'. ~, .~ . V' ~,..-. "~-~'~' '.,'.. ' ;' ' ...',-"~'. ',--'~ " ~' .' .' ~'~ . · " ~ '- "'t ~m~.,.., "v '%' ' · ~t .-~ ----.~ ....... ._ ~.Z~ . · " ','£' 4- '~ . ' 1.' "~L L~ ..= j .' . . '~ . ~ .':,~' '...L~ .' .. ' '. ' , rr t !~ .':'~" l' ' · .... '''-- "'":-- .... "' '" ~."-~. ' · ' ' ' ' '. · · . . - ' ', · · "~U'I,,' r'L,8]~' . .' ' ! II I'l~ ',i$ .'.],~' 32[ slm~"~P~l~ .rm.....'. · , .... ~..~.o~'~.~ · . .... .. · ". Ill[1,t~ ItF..~_~: '.,~.~..'.. '. ' . [ · · ' "' ' . .~]J'J~ I~JL¥'~I~ ' ~ :..'.'. "~ ~o~/' .'~ D~ · ~:.-'----'"'2' "..'_'" · :'. .l~N I[ ~i ' . . ' ' ~' ~' ~...............: .:.......~ . .. · . . ... · uvo~ ONo~ 13~a . · .. ... ~.'. ":' '"' '"..' '"': """"" '. '.. O~s' sa srm- ' . .~ ~ ~, . · . . · . · ... . .' . . .: ~"~$'. ~ _~ ~ 6,~ ,~ -- · ,~ ~ ~. ~. , · · . '...~ . . ...=~.. ,~'.,,-~.~,~:~ ?%,%~,~,-_,,-'g'%f}~-~,~ ~, ~,-~,L,,~?, .,,........~ . .~~a ~ ....... ~f~.. ~_~.~':~. ~,__ _.~.~.~-a~ .... .. .~ . m ~ '~. ~ ?. '- e~ ~ ~ ~.' ~'.% ~'~ ~"x~._..Z.~ -~ ~ - ' '. .. · ? .~~ 'a.r'..."-~/~~-' ~~ L .' ~"L~' ',~ ~- '"' '. '. I ~1.'~' ~':' j ' ~~~:~"~N,~I S<~'~ .,~ .. .- m ,. .-. . . ~,e~,e~U., · ~~~ ~,.~% :... , m. · : · ~,, ,¢ ,,. m ~~ ~,~'.,11~- ~-. .. · · · ' ~ .~. , . '6 ,, . I~ - ~ , ' ~ . ~ ,. ' . · -.¢,,. . ~.....~. .." · .. 6 q'. · ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ · i · ' i ..... : ~l ~ '~" . ~' ~ '~". ....... ~~'k~"~ :~.~ .... [ I'1.~ ~ ' .-_,,~?-,~-_~: ./7-~,..[.r . / 2 'M~[~'~',5~2'~.· J..' '. -- ~ &~'~ ' ' ~ .h , ' ' ~ r ...~. ~ . · · . .:~ .~. ~- ~'.. ,.~.. ~ ... ~ /~. ,,~_~-~-~,.~ ..../... .... .-[IM~q. · .~ :~-~2,"'~':~ ~ ~' : /. [~.~.~ ~. J~.l,~' ~'..A' .... .. I1~ ~g · -~,. ~...~ ¢~:_,~'~ ..' :~~:~'=&~W2~,'~ .-./ · :111~$ ~' ' -. ~ ~ ' I ". '~' ~' ' "' ~ ~ ..... ~= ~' ~ -f?~'?: ~ · ~ '. ."' '... '~1~' "' :' ~'.'~L' '''~ ~-"~ <~ ' ' '. , C~./,~ t~Y~[ ~' ~-~_ · '--/.-' .. ' ' . '1~ ~.. · .~ ~,.,;~:-,.~" ~' ,~- ~.... '~.~ ~:~~"~.'7.. './ . '.. .... .. ~A.~[~ ..' '.".-~.~- ,~ I..".- ::. ~ ~"~ · ' ~~~'~+~'~h,~.'.'.'-'~ ..... ~:. .... '-..'"~_~,~ "- · . -. -~s ~ ~m-~',' ? .:~ . · ~'~ ~ ~- -~,~'~i,~1 ~--'-~.. '/' '-. .:.-.:~' -' -.~ 'u~ .~ .. ~' .. , ~ · : - · . ,~~~ ~ ~~ ~. ,~ ~ % · , /~ ~' . , . · .......,.... · ~,. ~ '' ,g ~ · ~ ~ ~ - ~, ~' . .., . ,. .... .......... _~? ,e~ .~ .~ ' :g~,.~ l~l · ~ ~.~ ,~.~~ ~'-_~. ' .'~". .m'mmm-i-: · · "' ,~ ~'e , . ..~;~..,~ ~- "...l~ ~...~ ~~f~ ,~ ~" ~ ...,.- . -mm:mm-, . /g,:i~...' '. ~,~.~,~'~ z ~ ,~ ,~.' ~/ / ' '. mmm~:~,, ... -.~- ~ · ,~ . · . ~ ~ · ~ ~ . · . · . - . -: . .~.~., ~' ,~~'~,~ ~. / ' -:... ~1.~ ~ · . · .,~ ~ ,.~ m~ ~~:~~ · ./... ·., .'.'. -.. m.m~.'l~.."= :. · ~.%~A~ . ~~?*'. ~ ~" '/:...;.-..'11.~.." · · .'~," '~ 3~ ·/ ~' ¢~ , ~ /' ... ' .... / -~ ~ ' · . ....~'~-~ .¢~?. ~-. ~ ,,: ~ .~'." · X ./ . ' "'. · .' · .'.' ~ ~.' _ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~% ~ ~ . ~ . · ...... ~ · · ~ ~ ~.~-.,~ ,.'-.~,- X /' . · .... . · ~:'~1~ ~. - . ~ .~ . ,, ~ ~ ~ ~ .~.. .... . . . B~-~. . . '~-~:'~'%~ ~"~" ~'' · ' ' - ' · : ".' "'I~B~ - ..... · ~ · ~ · '. - - t,[ ' . .. . ..... .... .. ,~,,~. .... =.,-,,,,,. F.. ..... :. · - .. '..' .'~ .~ i[ I .~' / ·~"..~ "..1 · · · "'"'" '... '. '.".-' '"" · I[':'~'~'-B ~I~ ~': *" :.'":-"~f':'.!.'.'-'."" .'-. ' ' ' '"' "" '""' "'.' '~1 '~m~ ~"*i?' ~" .".'..:..':....: ." .'..'...Y.' · ...... '...../..'.-: ...... · =...~ ...' ~ '. ~..~-....... ~,....~.: .................. .. :.....::....... · ' '"'"" "'"" """' ':'" '""~ ~',~ m~ ~'1' ~",'~ ~:~: .~,t',~~.." '" .'..'"'....':' ..... .... ...:... :,,}. ,.. .,........... · '.. ..... :." .'~...'....' -..'...' .' ..,.~,-,~ ~,,,~,~}~u~~~.f,~, ,' ~ .'.'..";.'.' .~ .... '~': ':' 1.~'~'~~-~'~*~'.. ~; ~.~'~.'~'¢;'. 'C~ "~' "'.'.:'-:f'~2:'."-~a'".':','.-..'....:...~:.;i'.-~;..'.~ :'.."'" :,~, ..L~,~~  :. "" 't ' .' '. .... '"';'= .... :: ,' ,"' ',-'-',' · "~'-, ""-'--,'~-::~-J -=- ~-/~ ..... ..--' ' ~ ..... ~ .... . - .. . .- . -., ..- ~. . ..~.~.~[-~ ~ ..... . .. 'APp~cafion., for:. Specml" 'Use Per~~' ..'-' ·" · -... ~;;~'=.-~2'::;'_ ,: ..... :7."':: '%%: ':'~.i-~-i~'i~ ~~hi~; '- ' ' ........... '"-. ........... "-' '" ':1<~'''~~"'~~''''' "'""' ....... ' :: · '"" ':" '" · '"'" "'": ........ ' .......... '1" ..... : .<.="' '..., ~&~-~.~.~ -'.... '.'..' .' _'_~.'........... ~~_, ~'~{i~...~.~r~u~" :- '".:;' ..".. ' "..-~1~"~"~,~ ;."". '" .. ' . :' ' . '.' ~~'~':.~':'~ . . I~D~_,. . ... ....' '~~.. .. ~ .~. ..."" .. ~z~~S~~r~_.$~;6.,'~,. _ . ...... ~'~'~'"':"":". ~. .,,"' · '1 '-. .' (~wB~y~'~?~) '... ....... .' · ' · · .' · .'..-' ". · ..~ ..,-'~:.~.'.'.'~':.,'.'~ ' .". I~,'~~~~u~~,.,.~,~,~,':.'.' ~.4~__~_~-~:~m .': ' ' ".'.~':'.?.1 ."....~'~~~,,~~',~,~,, ... ....~.,,~,, - 0~:~).,..I -' ....~.~y~.~~.~,~,~,¢~.~.~'~,~ '.... '.. . Add~' t95' ~y~b~:i.~ · '~.0 ~ 8147~y ~rlo~¢'~i~'.:,' S~t~....~.~ Zip.'2'2~6 " . ... · . . .... . .~. · .. ~ '~ ...... ... · .. · . .:. .. . ~'-.-"~ · . .. .~ . · .... .. Da~imePhon6( 43¢ )'-979-818Z . F~¢ (434~ 296-3510 . . · ....... ~_: ......... -~ .... .._ ..... = ..... . . , 'I.om .~d' Cou=t~ ~f~, ~est o,f'.~ree Br~dee .l~o S'ales .. '~I M.clnfim Ro~-'~ ~l'OttesY~le, VA'22902 ~ Voi~: 29~5832 O Fax: 9~;411fi :11 ~. .~- ~-~. . .--.: 'ATfACHMENT. B " ".= ' ~at sUch'~se wi. Il net ~e o~ subst~fi~ de~ent m sflj~'~ny, ~t.t~ ch~a~m[ of t~.~ '" 'wi~ nOt'~ ch~g~ ~emby.~ ~d: ~a~ su~ use w~[ ~'in hh~hy wi.ffi-~e:p~ ~d ~t~t'of ~s W~i co ~m ~ ~f ~ ~y? ' - .... ' S~ ~ V~' fl ~f ~. . ....... " ' ' ":' ' , " ."- :. .'.. ... .'.',.-. . . :.....,.: .. " :'::"....:.' .r .. · ~'~B. ' . . . .. . . . .-: . . .... :-. ...... ~.~.-~: .. bu~ima~e'm .~ueh' 'a, Bz~y-Bash~7 Ford, Cr~ ~/Porsch~'/~d.i ~ ' ~a~to~ .g~_ c'mnt:.er ~ .-. .and F~ee .Br'~ge AnCo gale~. .' '. as a= aut~b%le dealership will have s~er'mI .poe'it~ve benefice for Cooney Of A~b~zle, 3) ~he '~ntrodueelo~ o'f ~ aueomobtle~ Co 'thl~ .area..w~tl"P~.v~e' more variety, for'future automobile p~rchase~, Wil% ~...mae~ ~he...~Ire~ion '.~. ~'c~e.1 '~sge} .omer'.ot ~e ~otor'.g~r , · . · ; · /.' _ .; ~. · ~... · · .¢peza~e'~i~h' ES.'.- ~0 em~:~o~'e.::..'~l~ has a projected ~n~l~ay~o%l of ~750,000 - .... no mcm~ p~ ~ b.~'~, pl~ ~ovide.~gd dcmpfion of~ pm~ ~d " Nora:' If ~u ~' ~aag a ~i~'use p~it 0nly foe a pmon o~ ~.~~} it .'. ~ 2.. . ~n~ip ~oi'~iafi~ - H~~p of ~a pretty, is in ~' n~ of any:t~ ~ l~g~' '..~e C~ty ·must be sub~. e~fi~ing ant a~ per~ ~i~ing baow ~'~ au&0fity to'do- --~," .. · .'.... " .- " · .... · '. If ~' ~li~t is a .~'~a~f, .a'.d~u~nt a~p~le to ~e' ~ty must ~ · sub~tr~ .eWtd~' ~e'~.r.'~.wrj~mn.c0gient. m ~ a~h~fion.' · ~ ~e appl~c~t is ~ ag~t ~ ~¢ owner, a.d0ea~/~pmbI¢ ~ Ee Cmnty ~st be $fi'b~t~ ~.~t is ev~&n~ 0f the ~mnce ~d m~¢ of t~ ~ney, .. '.. O~ION~'A~A~~': ' '. · [~ 3: Drawings.m"mmccptuai plans, if any. ' ... .. I hereby certify, that I own 'r. tie..~hjec[.prol~ert7, ¢; have the leg~ powe'i: to act on t~atf Of.the owner ..filing this application: i also certify that the informetio~} pro~icl~d b true and' accurate to the.b~t of my' Signature Printed Name · Daytime phone, numb~' of Si~amry A..TT:AcHMENT'c :. Apr~ 22, ~.002. · 1·95 Riverbend ~dve ' P O Box t47 Oh arfot'[e,viLle, 'vA '2;298,8 RE; .ARB']2~2,2.7"~a ~Le~hi0 'Ro'~e 2~0E · Tax ~p.78,..~1.9 . .. . · .D*~r ~r. Cam~:' .'. 'The ~,lbemarLe ¢o'unty. Arc. hJtecJurat Review Bear~, at its meatLrtg on .Al~ril 1.5, .2'~02, co&let~.d, a ; '...' -. pre[imiriary'reYJew.of t~e al~,c~in~l' req~ .¢~. !~.'reno~'a~.the' C~J .,,,"¢~.C~e'urmet R,es~.uraat'~.[.use..a~.an: · autOmobile dealersh[p'a~d to e~t~bliSh ou~J~0r dis1~lay ~ ~;'~b. iCle~. The:ARB'unanimousty ~.to ~a~ ~he fo~[o~ re~m~end~tb~ b ~hs P~ning Comm~ion. . · .. ..: - · l) '.Vei",i61e~ ~h,a[I not be ejegated .... :2} V. ehiele..4.'~ai~ b'e 'ct[~pi'a¥~ed ~nl.c'in'the are~'in~a~ed ~r d~splay.~h~w~ on t~e ~t~.' ...: '"':' 3) The u~e'sh~f net ~m~ence.u'ntil 8' Ced.~te of App~prib~n6~s'.]s aAp~v.ed. ~. ~e.~.~B, 'l~cl~in9 ' lan~s~pe.an¢ lighti0B'plans- 4) The applicant shall'~ovide ~s ~ ~g ~e ~ter or ~r/ve ~q'.o~ coffer .-2 %* ~iipef, a~ ~h¢.'bob~m of .... ... .. the 8tope.. Provide a mix ~f"~me~J~ trees, ~c~e~in9 s~bs, and' ~amen~l trees.th~ghou~ the ~1o~ to soEen [~'egpeafance, · .:. · ". la ~'sensus,.r~ard[ng tko pmlimina~ si~ plan, the A.RB agre%d ~h ~he.~¢~ ~m~.~,.a,~,. .~ered.the ~in9 comme~m for the bedefit ef ~e appl~a~fs ~nal. 8u~s~q. P~a~e n~ ina[ ~ne fol~wing.comme~ts ~m ~e that have b~n i6ent[~ed at this time, Addit~nal ~mmeot¢ may be ~doed:. · . er Criminated based on ~ef review an'd changes to [he plan. . .'. ~. 'Cl~ri~ the ~p~amnce ~f all re~i~i'n9 ~115. ~ndmate'ma~ials, coles, and'height. Use.l~'dsCap~n9 ~ mi~ the;imp~t 9f ~ni~g wails on ~e.site and the EC. .. ~, Pmvide'~mpleteinfc~efl¢~ ~ lighting, ~.' .P.mvide [eg[b[~ el~v'&Sens that.are to ~c.~e, ]denti~ proposed ma~rlals a~d ~lors.. ' 4.'. Pmv.~e a dump~ter $~n de~il. " · · .. 5. Reg~rdi.ng [he~and~apepla~:. : '. 'l(may'be di~cu[ b. ebtaLn Cedis c~nadensJs a~d Cereus florida ~th [he req~red ~iomum c¢['~ ~f. .. ' 25". PleaSe note th'a[ ~m.~m~i~ t~e he~'h( for a 2%" ¢aBper ~me ~ 12'-14'. Revi~e ~e key. · accd~ihgiy. ATTACHM E'N:T0 · Tmes'a.~ngRo~ ~:0 ~11 ha~ a minimum ~lipe~ef.~ ~ flowedng ~a~ ~s.~hourd '" . "~ added.aS ~r ~ ~ d~ign'~d~, ae~ .of ~e type of. planing da~'n Pmp~ed along · . Roum ~50, a ~u'itable ~n for 2 dmemenmt ~es Js'Jn the w~t c~mer by the ~nt pa~ing ar~... · ' tn~i~ t~ heig~'ef.~ed ~.. 'Coordinate .the height of ~e o~d w~e'8 wJ~ the m~re h~ght 0f p~s~' t~s a~g Route ~O, · '" .' . ..... .* · ~ A ~e ~ th~ Earn ~e.¢ ~e.~t~n~ drive, ' · ' · · Use the dwe~en~ mf.Bu~rd HolJy and p'~nt 3' on ~nmr; ~h~ ·plant p~p~ gm~ ~ a ~eight · of ¢.0'). · Contfnue ~e sbmb~ a~und th~ ends et the ~ont p~king ~w. ' ' - Continue ~e s~b mass abng.~e ~e'm edge ~ the pe~ a~ 'and aDn~ ~e e~t ~at ~e well Is v~ible.~m ~e EC, ~. hetp s~n ~e ap~a~ o'f Pmvrde g~nd cover O. s~ greater.man 33%. "" ' '" Pm~de g~und cover ~n plandng ~ian.ds, ." ' ~d ~e~ ~ the is~s fn lhe ffon~ parking ar~ ~ 'h~p minfm~e the im~ the EC. · ' · P~v~e ~es along ;he..fn~or d~e, 40' .on caner, 2~' cafipe¢,. ~ ~he ~Ecm mix ~f sc~¢[n;.~, screening shrub~,' ~d ornamental tre~ thCuugho~ ~a.;lope ~ so~n its a ppearanbe. · · . · Elimi~m ail pip~e.cenflic~' , Pm~de t~es t~ [he ~t ¢ ~e ~a~g ama"that ~¢'~ix futur~ .s~e~,. · "' ':' '='." ' 1} ~umte elevat;~m$.o¢ ~e bu'iJdJ~, r~ponding to ~he e~i~fin~/odBinaJ.~t~ct~re, '" 2) I~on ~n the ~lo~ ~ mate~als te be us~. · .... .-. your application f~r 'fi~aJ AR~ nview m~y.'~ made at your eadiest ~hve~i~ce. "Reoi~e.d dfawi~g~ :addr~sing the ~mmen~' lig.ted ab¢¢e ~fl' be reqd~red, A '~ubmission. end renew sche~le, an. · appticatie~, and a checklisi are' ~aChed ~r ~sr ~venieflce. ' · 8fn cerety. . iMargaret Maiis~ew~ki ." " .'" ' Design Ptant~er, · -.Cc: . ,v~4j. Le.tephen Wale'er COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Virginia Public School Authority SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Request adoption of a resolution approving the filing of an application to the Virginia Public School Authority for a loan in a principal amount not to exceed $8,700,000. STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Castner, Breeden; Ms. White AGENDA DATE: August14,2002 ACTION: X CONSENT AGENDA: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: ACTION: IN FORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Funding for the FY 2002/03 Capital Improvement Budget anticipated the issuance of $8,700,000 in bonds through the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) for various school projects. DISCUSSION: Participation in the bond issue requires both the School Board and Board of Supervisors to pass a resolution authorizing application to VPSA. It is anticipated at this time that the School Board will pass the resolution at their meeting on August 22, 2002 and the Board of Supervisors on August 14, 2002. The required application will be submitted to VPSA by their September 3, 2002 deadline. A number of actions (resolutions, public hearings, approvals) will be required between now and November 2002 to meet the requirements of VPSA and to maintain their time schedule. The required documents will be submitted to you as received by the Director of Finance from the County's bond counsel. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests approval of the attached resolution authorizing the County's application to the Virginia Public School Authority for $8,700,000 in bond revenues. At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, held on the 14th day of August, 2002, at the time and place established by such Board for its regular meetings in accordance with Section 15.2-1416 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, at which the following members were present and absent during the voting for the resolution referred to below: PRESENT: David P. Bowerman; Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr., Charles S. Martin Walter F. Perkins; Dennis S. Rooker; Sally H. Thomas ABSENT: None the following resolution was adopted by the affirmative roll call vote of a majority of all members of the Board of Supervisors, the ayes and nays being recorded in the minutes of the meeting as shown below: MEMBER VOTE David Bowerman Aye Lindsay Dorrier Aye Charles Martin Aye Walter Perkins Aye Dennis Rooker Aye Sally Thomas Aye RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION WITH THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY FOR A LOAN IN AN APPROXIMATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $8,700,000 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of Albemarle County, Virginia (the "County"), in collaboration with the Albemarle County School Board, has determined that it is necessary and desirable for the County to undertake capital improvements for its public school system; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board hereby approves the filing of an application with the Virginia Public School Authority for a loan to the County in an approximate principal amount of $8,700,000 to finance capital improvements for its public school system. The County Executive, in collaboration with the other officers of the County and the Albemarle County School Board, is hereby authorized and directed to complete an application and deliver it to the Virginia Public School Authority. 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a regular meeting of the Board held on the 14th day of August, 2002, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. WITNESS my signature and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, this 15th day of August, 2002. (SEAL) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County, Virginia 26222.000026RICHMOND875903vl Bob Tucker From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Brenda Neitz Thursday, August 08, 2002 10:16 AM Bob Tucker Melvin Breeden VPSA 2002 Projects Description Amount ADA Structural Changes Brownsville Addition Jouett Addition/Renovation Monticello High School Addition Design Post-High House Southern Elementary School Walton School Addition School Maintenance/Replacement Projects $ 2,386,000 2,318,000 933,000 250,000 20,000 100,000 2,643,000 Total $8,700,000 Brenda K. Neitz Fiscal Assistant County of Albemarle Department of Finance Voice: 434/296-5855 Fax: 434/872-4598 50,000 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE Office of the Mayor P.O. Box 911 · Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Telephone (434) 970-3113 August 1, 2002 Ms. Sally Thomas, Chair Board of Supervisors. Albemarle County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Sally: The purpose of this letter is to invite you to join us on an educational trip to Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, October 15, 2002. The purpose of this trip is to learn about creative planning and development ideas from other communities, which may be applicable to our community. Burlington is known to have tried a number of creative ideas, which our whole community could benefit from. We want to make this a community-learning trip and thus want to make sure that leaders from the City/County/University and the private sector experience this trip jointly as our destinies are tied together and as we are part of one large community. The City has arranged similar learning trips in previous years to Chattanooga, Tennessee and Athens, Georgia. You play a very important part in this community and thus your participation in this joint venture is very important. I would like to urge you to join us in this journey of learning. The City will arrange for transportation, but we are asking that each participant pay his or her share of the cost for the whole trip. Our current estimate is that this trip will cost around $535 per person. Mr. Satyendm Huja, Director of Strategic Planning, will be coordinating this trip, so please let him know by August 15, 2002, as to your willingness and ability to join us. Please also note that due to limited capacity, we need to finalize the list as soon as possible. I look forward to joining you on this exciting trip. Mayor 08-05-02P01:34 RCVD