HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-02-03
FINAL
February 3, 1993
County Office Building
with School Board
9:00 A.M. 7
1) Call to rder.
2) Pledge 0 Allegiance.
3) Moment 0 Silence.
4) Other Ma ters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) Consent genda (on next sheet).
6) Approval of Minutes: February 12, February 19 and March l1(A), 1992.
7) Highway tters.
a) Dis ussion: Designation of Roads for the National Highway System.
b) Oth r Highway Matters.
8) Discussi n: Resolution to request Industrial Access Funds from the Department of Transportation to construct
Ind strial Access Road in Mill Creek Industrial Park.
9) Public on request to include property of David W. Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum (Goco, Inc.)
in ervice area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority; water service only to TM79,P19
dC-I; water service only to existing structures to TM79,PI8, zoned RA. Properties located at inters
of t 22 & Rt 250E. Rivanna District (Defer to March 3, 1993).
10) ZMA-92-0 and SP-92-33. Donnie and Catherine Dunn (deferred from January 13, 1993.)
11) Request 0 Support Petition of Citizens for Albemarle to designate the Moormans River as an exceptional water.
12) Update - MACAA Funding Request.
13) Constitu ional Officers Supplemental Funding Request.
14) Report: Arson Investigator Position.
15) Report: Bus Service to Pantops and Route 29 North (Walmart).
16) Interim eport of the Fiscal Impact Analysis Committee.
17) Appropri tions:
a) Tr sfer of funds from Greenwood Community Center to Mint Springs.
b) Adj stment to School Board Reserve based on actual June 30, 1992, Fund Balance.
c) Ad itional funding for GATEC.
d) Wa ut Creek Park Nature Trail.
e) Ad itional approved positions in Social Services.
f) Te Center.
18) Other tters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
19) Cancel ebruary 10, 1993, meeting.
20) 12:30 P. . - *Executive Session: Personnel and Legal Matters.
21) Certify Executive Session.
22) Appoin ents.
23) 2:30 P. . - Trip to Waynesbo:ro to review bailing facility.
24) Adjourn.
*It is e pected that the Board will entertain a motion to enter into executive session, as permitted by Section
2.1-344 of the Code of Virginia, under Section 2.1-344.A.1 for the purpose of discussing personnel matters and
under S ction 2.1-344.A.7 for the purpose of discussing legal matters.
FOR APPROVAL
CONSENT AGENDA
5.1 Resolut"on supporting VACo's position requesting Congressional representatives to delete the financial assurance
requir ent for public and waste management facilities.
5.2 on of the Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority regarding central groundwater
5.3 of Chairperson to the Rivanna Solid Waste Advisory Committee.
5.4 Approva of lease agreement with the Albemarle County Service Authority for rental space for VPI Extension
relocat on.
5.5 Authori y Chairman to sign well dedication document for the Ivy Creek Natural Area.
5.6 Towers or Cellular Phones (defer to March 3, 1993).
5.7 Authori e Chairman to sign Service Agreement for the Earlysville Volunteer Fire Company to purchase new fire-
fightin vehicles.
FOR ON:
5.8 Letter ated January 21, 1993, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, re: Route
708, re uest for guardrail.
5.9 Letter ated January 20, 1993, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, Department of Transportation, addressed to
David K lergis, re: proposed Charlottesville bypass; with attached copy of letter dated January 11, 1993, from
David K lergis, addressed to Ray D. Pethtel.
ated January 15, 1993, from E. C. Cochran, Jr., State Location and Design Engineer, Department of
tation, providing notification of a Location and Design Public Hearing on March 11, 1993, to consider
osed location and design of Route 743 (Hydraulic Road) from Route 657 (Lambs Road) to Route 631 (Rio
Albemarle County.
5.10
5.11
of statements by Constance Kinchloe, Culpeper District Representative on the Commonwealth Transportation
o the North Charlottesville Business Council on January 26, 1993.
5.12
ated January 11, 1993, from Richard W. Kienle, Norfolk Southern Corporation, addressed to David P.
, Chairman, transmitting copy of application of Norfolk Southern Railway Company filed with the State
ion Commission for authority to close the Charlottesville, Virginia, agency and place Charlottesville
jurisdiction of the agency at Manassas, Virginia. Any person who desires to file written comments
g the application or request a formal hearing on a substantive objection must do so on or before
22, 1993.
5.13
dated January 6, 1993, from Dr. Susan L. McLeod, Director, Thomas Jefferson Health District, to
Mitchell Van Yahres, Peter T. Way, V. Earl Dickinson and Watkins M. Abbitt; and Senators Edgar Robb
ward Houck, re: Local Health Department State Budget Concerns.
5.14
dated January 21, 1993, from Jim Klein, Project Director, Shenandoah National Park Related Lands
notice of open houses to be held in Rockingham and Albemarle Counties to review the final draft
maps prepared for the Related Lands Study.
5.15 Letter d ted January 5, 1993, to Alfred C. Shackelford, III, from Amelia G. McCulley, Zoning Administrator, re:
Official Determination of l'fIDber of Parcels - Section 10.3.1; Tax Map 48, Parcel 19.
5.16 port - Scottsville Boundary Line Adjustment.
5.17 report of activities of the Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District during the months of
November and December 1992.
5.18 1 summary of activities of the Jefferson Area Board for Aging Advisory Council, dated January 22,
5.19 Copies 0 Land Use Chart and Development Code Index as prepared by the Department of Zoning.
5.20 Financia Management Report for December, 1992.
5.21 Letter d ted January 15, 1993, from Hugh C. Miller, Director, Department of Historic Resources, to M. Joseph
Conte, M chie Tavern, re: Request to include Michie Tavern, Albemarle County, (mIR File No. 02-93) on the
Virginia Landmarks Register and nominating it to the National Register of Historic Places.
5.22 1992 th Quarter Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development.
5.23 1992 End Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development.
5.24 Copy of lanning Commission minutes for December 22, 1992, and January 5, 1993.
5.25 Copy of Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority for October 22, November 19
and Dec
5.26 Copy of Blue Ridge Committee for Shenandoah National Park Relations for January 7, 1993.
5.27 Letter da ed January 22, 1993, from H. Allen Glover, Jr., Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, re: application of
Appalachi Power Company for a general increase in rates filed with the State Corporation Commission.
dated January 29, 1993, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, re: Recycling Data - Rivanna
e Authority.
5.28
MOTION: Mr. Bain
SECOND: Mrs. Humphris
MEETING DATE: February 3, 1993
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has
convened an executi ve meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1
requires a certification by the
supervisors that such executive
conformity with Virginia law;
of the Code of Virginia
Albemarle County Board of
meeting was conducted in
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.
VOTE:
AYES: Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin,
Perkins and Bain.
NAYS: None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE: None.
ABSENT DURING MEETING: None.
"-
\
\
/\ .'
L_. i I \
\/ ,\.l~'~
Albemarle
Supervisors
_/}" '~~
\',.r. ,'c . ~
'-- . '-- \-
Deputy Clerk,
Copnty Board of
.
Edward H, Ba n, Jr.
Samuel Mill
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R, Marshall. Jr,
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
CharJottesvill
Charles S, Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F~ Perkins
White Hall
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director/Planning & Community Development
FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~~
DATE: February 5, 1993
S BJECT: Board Actions of February 3, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Following is a list of actions taken by the Board at its meeting on
F bruary 3, 1993 (day meeting):
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
P BLIC.
Mr. Rudy Beverly and Ms. Sharleen Marenas from the Forum for Hope and
Haling presented a statement concerning racism in the community and requested
Bard adoption of a resolution opposing racism.
The Board ADOPTED the attached Resolution.
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Resolution supporting VACo's position requesting
ngressional representatives to delete the financial assurance requirement
r public and waste management facilities.
ADOPTED the attached Resolution. Copies of the resolution have been
rwarded to VACo and representatives in Congress.
Item 5.2. Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Albemarle County
rvice Authority regarding central groundwater systems.
ADOPTED the attached policy Resolution. Copy of the resolution forward-
e to J.W. Brent.
County Attorney to discuss with staff whether this policy requires an
a endment to the Zoning Ordinance.
Item 5.3. Appointment of Chairperson to the Rivanna Solid Waste
visory Committee.
Recommended the appointment of Lorraine Haney as Chairperson of the
R vanna Solid Waste Advisory Committee, with term to expire May 1, 1994.
Item 5.4. Approval of lease agreement with the Albemarle County Service
A thority for rental space for VPI Extension relocation.
I!
. .
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
February 5, 1993
2
Dcte:
Pcge:
AUTHORIZED the county Executive to execute a lease agreement with the
A bemarle County Service Authority for rental space for VPI Extension, subject
tc review of the document by the county Attorney's office. Please provide the
C erk with a copy of the signed agreement.
Item 5.5. Authorize the Chairman to sign well dedication document for
tl e Ivy Creek Natural Area.
AUTHORIZED the Chairman to execute the attached well dedication document
f( r the Ivy Creek Natural Area. Document forwarded to Pat Mullaney to obtain
C ty Council's approval.
Item 5.6. Towers for Cellular Phones (defer to March 3, 1993).
DEFERRED to March 3, 1993.
Item 5.7. Authorize Chairman to sign Service Agreement for the Earlys-
v lle Volunteer Fire Company to purchase new fire fighting vehicles.
AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the attached Service Agreement approving
t~e disbursement of funds to Earlysville Volunteer Fire Company.
Item 5.13. Memorandum dated January 6, 1993, from Dr. Susan L. McLeod,
D rector, Thomas Jefferson Health District, to Delegates Mitchell Van Yahres,
P~ter T. Way, V. Earl Dickinson and Watkins M. Abbitt; and Senators Edgar Robb
a~d R. Edward Houck, re: Local Health Department State Budget Concerns.
A letter has been drafted for the Chairman's signature requesting the
S ate legislators support, of Dr. McLeods budget concerns as they relate to
A bemar1e County.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Discussion: Designation of Roads for The National
H ghway System.
DEFERRED to February 17, 1993 to allow the Metropolitan Planning Organ i-
z~tion an opportunity to review this matter.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Other Highway Matters.
CONSENSUS of the Board that staff prepare a report on the mechanics of
hplding a bond issue, estimate of the size of issue necessary to fund road
p~ojects that are pending and related information. Mrs. Humphris requested
that her analysis of November 20, 1991, be included in the report.
Agenda Item No.8. Resolution to request Industrial Access Funds from
tpe Department of Transportation to construct Industrial Access Road in Mill
C~eek Industrial Park.
ADOPTED the attached Resolution for Industrial Access Funds from the
D~partment of Transportation to construct an Industrial Access Road in Mill
C~eek Industrial Park, and instructed the county Attorney to obtain the
n~cessary surety from Mill Creek Land Trust to guarantee that the Board will
!
.
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
February 5, 1993
3
Date:
Page:
net involve local funds in this project should the Board's bond to the state
be forfeited at the end of the three-year period. The Board also ADOPTED the
attached policy governing requests for use of Industrial Access Funds from the
Cemmonwealth of Virginia to construct an industrial access road.
Agenda Item No.9. Public Hearing on request to include property of
David W. Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum (Goco, Inc.) in service area
beundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority; water service only to
T~79,P19 zoned C-1; water service only to existing structures to TM79,P18,
zcned RA. Properties located at inters of Rt 22 & Rt 250E. Rivanna District.
DEFERRED until March 3, 1993.
Agenda Item No. 10. ZMA-92-06 and SP-92-33. Donnie and Catherine Dunn.
DEFERRED until the applicant can bring back information regarding the
ccnsultant that will be used to provide the following information:
1. Detailed flow data on springs;
2. The maximum amount of water usage (from all sources and for
all purposes);
3. A hydrologic analysis of the area to determine:
a. How spring water withdrawal affects area ground
and surface water;
b. How a well used in conjunction with the bottling
facility would affect area ground and surface
water; and
4. septic requirement of the proposal.
Agenda Item No. 11. Request to support Petition of Citizens for
A bemarle to designate the Moormans River as an exceptional water.
The Board supported the petition of Citizens for Albemarle to designate
t~e Moormans River as an exceptional water. A letter has been drafted for the
C~airman's signature to members of the State Water Control Board. The Board
a so asked staff to work with members of Citizens for Albemarle to notify and
i~form property owners of public hearings scheduled on this designation by the
S ate Water Control Board.
Agenda Item No. 12. Update - MACAA Funding Request.
DESIGNATED that $140,000 from the proceeds of the sale of the YMCA
p~operty be appropriated and distributed to MACAA with the express understand-
i~g that the funds be used for the purposes outlined in their request. This
approval is subject to participation by the City, as outlined in MACAA's
f nancial proposal.
Agenda Item No. 13. Constitutional Officers Supplemental Funding
R~quest.
The Board directed staff to proceed with a comprehensive review of
slpplementing salaries for employees of Constitutional officers, as outlined
i~ the staff report. This review should include what other jurisdictions are
I'
..
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
February 5, 1993
4
Dcte:
Pcge:
dcing. This information is to be brought back to the Board in time for review
d\ring budget deliberations.
Agenda Item No. 14. Report: Arson Investigator Position.
The Board requested the Fire Prevention Officer position be rewritten to
ilclude the responsibilities of an Arson Investigator.
Agenda Item No. 15. Report: Bus Service to Pantops and Route 29 North
n almart) .
ADOPTED the attached policy for evaluating requests for public transpor-
tition in Albemarle County. The Board also requested staff to add the
p oposed routes (Pantops and Route 29 North) to the unfunded priority list for
censideration by the Board during budget deliberations.
Agenda Item No. 16. Interim Report of the Fiscal Impact Analysis
Cemmittee.
Directed the Fiscal Impact Analysis Committee to proceed with a Request
fer Proposal for a Fiscal Impact Model. The proposed RFP would solicit bids
fer a basic fiscal impact analysis model, as well as an added component to
leok at the impact of regulations or development policies on economic communi-
t .
Agenda Item No. 17a. Appropriation: Transfer of funds from Greenwood
Cemmunity Center to Mint Springs.
APPROVED appropriation. Form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 17b. Appropriation: Adjustment to School Board Reserve
b sed on actual June 30, 1992, Fund Balance.
APPROVED appropriation. Form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 17c. Appropriation: Additional funding for CATEC.
APPROVED appropriation. Form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 17d. Walnut Creek Park Nature Trail.
APPROVED appropriation. Form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 17e. Additional approved positions in Social Services.
APPROVED appropriation. Form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 17f. Teen Center.
APPROVED appropriation. Form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No 17g. Appropriation: Community Attention.
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
February 8, 1993
5
D !ite:
P!ige:
Removed from the agenda.
Agenda Item No. 18. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
B DARD .
The Board APPOINTED stephen Ayers to the Joint Airport Commission with
t~rm to expire on December 1, 1995.
The Board APPOINTED Arthur Brown to the Community Services Board (Region
T~n) with term to expire on June 30, 1995.
The Board APPOINTED Frank Rice from the Charlottesville District to the
E~alization Board with term to expire on December 31, 1993.
The Board APPOINTED Bruce Kirtley to the Thomas Jefferson Housing
Inprovements corporation with term to expire on December 31, 1995.
The Board REAPPOINTED Thomas Stevens to the Jordan Development Corpora-
t on with term to expire on August 13, 1993.
The Board REAPPOINTED C. Timothy Lindstrom and Scott B. Peyton to the
P blic Recreational Facilities Authority with term to expire on December 13,
1 95.
The Board APPOINTED Tim Michel to the Public Recreational Facilities
A thority with term to expire on December 13, 1995.
The Board requested the Clerk to readvertise the vacancy on the Jordan
Dt velopment Corporation.
The Board requested staff do a comprehensive study of the current land-
Ule program in terms of the way it is implemented and administered to see if
t ere are any changes that can be made to the program.
The Board ADOPTED the attached Resolution of Intent to consider rezoning
Tix Map 32C, Section 3, Parcel 2 for Robert O. and Victoria H. Burton to R-4,
RE sidential from RA, Rural Areas.
The Board CANCELED the meeting for February 10, 1993.
E~ C/jnh
Attachments (17)
cc: Robert B. Brandenburger
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
George R. st. John
Bruce Woodzell
Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
File
. .
Edward H B 10, Jr
Sarnu('1 Mill r
David P. Bo rman
Charfottesvl Ie
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
.;r
~(
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
February 5, 1993
M . Sharleen Martenas
F rum for Hope and Healing
1 Altamont Circle, Apartment #42
C arlottesville, VA 22902
D ar Ms. Martenas:
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Albemarle County
Bard of Supervisors adopted the attached resolution opposing
r cism.
E C
Very truly yours,
?-tn I> \ Ie
~V4-. v\J --~/
Ella W. Carey, C~k'
!
CMC
v
A tachment
*
Printed on recycled paper
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Srotlsville
Chcrles S Martin
Rll,,'anna
Walter F PerklOs
While Hall
/. ~
,
f
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the Forum for Hope and Healing appeared
before this Board to express its moral outrage at an
incident that took place in this community on the evening
of January 22, 1993;
WHEREAS, the Board wants to make it clear to all
citizens of the County of Albemarle and the City of
Charlottesville that it will not tolerate racially
motivated behavior;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, hereby
requests the support of its citizens in ridding this
communi ty of racial tension and prej udices, and, also,
requests that positive steps be undertaken to address
issues of racism in our community.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the fore-
going writing, is a true, correct copy of a resolution
unanimously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
February 3, 1993.
6-'
~' '7 1
~. ' ! ~ cC A
Clerk, Board
1/ . ,. ...... ., /
~ Ii '{./l" :
i (j , C / ~.A_ -L !
of County super;\fisors
. ,
j'
)
,
~-,
-< i' (\ ~'L'
'_I( \~ C
Statement From the
Forum For Hope and Healing
Charlottesville, V A
re: Assault at Crazy Charlie's Bar and Grill
Ror More Information Contact:
January 22, 1993
Rudy Beverly at 977-1986 or Sharleen Martenas at 979-7006
J) !t_~fA-r?u,t1! en;:"' (!:.! io[
lirT .,Ie) L/ (.
/' /
I j. r..
./ ..' ~? ~J ;:.....,.
P-os
-) ~/
02 r)~3 re!3 ~N~
\
We, the Forum for Hope and Healing, are making this public statement to express our
moral outrage at an incident that took place in our community. On the evening of January 22,
1993, a University of Virginia student was assaulted by members of the Kappa Sigma fraternity
who are students at the University of Mississippi.
The Commonwealth of Virginia has charged six students with assault and battery. We
do not intend to prejudge the outcome of these legal proceedings, nor to deny these persons their
rights of due process. But, we are gravely concerned about the racially charged atmosphere in
hich the assault occurred. We understand the facts to be: 1) the victim was a black student
t the University of Virginia and those charged are white students from the University of
ississippi; 2) while only six individuals were charged, many others were involved in the assault;
d 3) numerous witnesses confirm the use of racial epithets by the attackers.
We want to make it clear to all citizens of the City of Charlottesville, and of Albemarle
unty, as well as to the communities of Mississippi and the nation, that we will not tolerate
cially motivated behavior.
This assault was not an isolated occurrence, and we are saddened by it. We recognize
hat there are numerous racially motivated incidents in our community, and we urge you to join
in working to rid our communities of racial tension and distrust. It is necessary that each of
examines our own heart and behavior in an effort to eradicate the prejudices we find in
urselves and to undertake positive steps to address issues of racism in our community. In the
ords of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., "We still have a choice today: nonviolent coexistence or
iolent coannihilation. This may well be mankind's last chance to choose between chaos and
mmunity. "
FORUM FOR HOPE AND HEALING
Charlottesville, VA
February 11, 1993
oard of Supervisors
Ibemarle County Office Building
1 McIntire Rd.
harlottesville, VA 22902-4596
ear Supervisors:
Thank you for adopting a Resolution in response to our request at your meeting of February 3,
1 93. As you can see from the enclosed copies of letters we have sent to the Governor of Mississippi, and
tl e University of Mississippi, your resolution has been sent to these communities to inform them of our
e forts to combat racially motivated behavior here--encouraging them to take steps of a similar nature in
ississippi. We have also sent copies of your Resolution to Governor Wilder, and to Senator Robb,
elegate van Yahres and Delegate Way at the General Assembly; in each case we have asked for their
adership in helping us address these issues in our community.
We have been saddened, as we are sure you are too, to learn of the further incidents of violence
p rpetrated against University of Virginia students last weekend. Whether or not these cases reflect "racially
otivated" behavior, they nonetheless create the perception of such and further heighten the racial tensions
our community.
We are speaking out publicly regarding these incidents, as well as conveying our concern to the
vi tims involved. We hope that you, too, will continue to help us address these issues in our community and
w rk with us in the future as we plan activities and/or programs to develop understanding and appreciation
o racial and ethnic diversity in our community.
Sincere y yours,
~ ~/I;! d Yh(((fr
Rud Iph A. Beverly
Co- oordinator, Forum for Hope and Healing
29 pring Court
Charlottesville, VA 22901
E closures (2)
/~J~~~:rv. " ..~
Sharleen J. Martenas
Co-Coordinator, Forum for Hope and Healing
11 Altamont Circle, #42
Charlottesville, VA 22902
--t~. ~
/cJ"C--i' CL~t!~ ttv~
.e;~'b {.'7' .~~~1--'
~; U h.-.
-~~ ~ .~~./~..
FORUM FOR HOPE AND HEALING
Charlottesville, VA
February 11, 1993
The Honorable Kirk Fordice
The Governor's Mansion
P.O. Box 2000
Jackson, MS 39215
Dear Governor Fordice:
The Forum for Hope and Healing was founded in the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County
in the summer of 1992 to address issues of racism in our community. The catalyst for our coming together
was the unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King verdict last spring. Our immediate objective was
to avert any such violence here.
On January 22, 1993, a black University of Virginia student was assaulted by several white students
from the University of Mississippi. In response to this incident, our Forum developed a Statement, which
has been signed by hundreds of citizens in our community--attesting to the depth of concern about the
matter here. As well, the City Council of Charlottesville and the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County
each adopted a Resolution in response to our request for official action with respect to this incident. Copies
of all of these items are enclosed for your consideration.
We have been informed of the action taken by the University of Mississippi with reference to the
Kappa Sigma Fraternity, and we are pleased to see a rapid response from the University on this matter.
And as we continue to work here to develop understanding and acceptance of racial and ethnic diversity,
thereby hopefully reducing racial tensions and promoting tolerance and community solidarity, we hope that
you will address issues of racial intolerance and insensitivity throughout the State of Mississippi.
SincerGly yours, 1 A
Ri:le~y)imLr
Co-Coordinator, Forum for Hope and Healing
29 Spring Court
Charlottesville, VA 22901
~~ WM.&~~.
Sharleen J. Mart~ r --.
Co-Coordinator, Forum for Hope and Healing
11 Altamont Circle, #42
Charlottesville, VA 22902
cc. City Council, Charlottesville, VA
Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County, VA
Enclosures (3)
FORUM FOR HOPE AND HEALING
Charlottesville, VA
February 11, 1993
Mr. Thomas D. Wallace
Acting Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs
University of Mississippi
University, MS 38677
Dear Mr. Wallace:
The Forum for Hope and Healing was founded in the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County
in the summer of 1992 to address issues of racism in our community. The catalyst for our coming together
was the unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King verdict last spring. Our immediate objective was
to avert any such violence here.
As you know, on January 22, 1993, a black University of Virginia student was assaulted by several
white students from the University of Mississippi. In response to this incident, our Forum developed a
Statement, which has been signed by hundreds of citizens in our community--attesting to the depth of
concern about the matter here. As well, the City Council of Charlottesville and the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County each adopted a Resolution in response to our request for official action with respect to
this incident. Copies of all of these items are enclosed for your consideration.
We have been informed of the action taken by the University of Mississippi with reference to the
Kappa Sigma Fraternity, and we are pleased to see a rapid response from you on this matter. And as we
continue to work here to develop understanding and acceptance of racial and ethnic diversity, thereby
hopefully reducing racial tensions and promoting tolerance and community solidarity, we hope that you, too,
~ take further steps of a like nature in your community.
sm:e,e!y ~7' d ) ld
R~. Bevedy r
Co-Coordinator, Forum for Hope and Healing
29 Spring Court
Charlottesville, VA 22901
~On A.,IT;: _-* }
Sharleen J. Mar~a~~'-<./'-""--"'"
Co-Coordinator, Forum for Hope and Healing
11 Altamont Circle, #42
Charlottesville, VA 22902
c. City Council, Charlottesville, VA
Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County, VA
Enclosures (3)
Edward H Ba n, Jr
S<'Hnuel Mill
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902.4596
(804) 296,5843 FAX (804) 972~4060
FOrrl"Sl R Marshall. .Jr
ScoltsvilJe
David P. Bow rman
ChClrlollesvI11
Charles S Martin
RIVdrlnd
Charlotte Y Humph"s
Jack ,Jouett
Walter r, Perkllls
While Hall
February 5, 1993
Mr. Larry Land
I tergovernmental Relations Coordinator
Virginia Association of Counties
1001 East Broad Street, Suite LL20
Richmond, VA 23219-1901
Mr. Land:
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors adopted the attached resolution urging Congress to
d'rect the Environmental Protection Agency to remove local govern-
m nts from the requirement of demonstrating financial assurance for
p blic and waste management facilities.
Very truly yours,
~lUL() C~UCA
Ella W. Carey, clerf~, CMC
The Honorable John W. Warner
The Honorable Charles S. Robb
The Honorable L. F. Payne
The Honorable Thomas J. Bliley, Jr.
(1)
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H Bin, ,Jr
Samuel Mill .T
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596
(804) 296,5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forres! R Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
DavId P 60 erman
Charlotlesvlle
Charles 5 Martm
RiVanna
Charlotte Y f umphns
Jack ,Jouett
Walter f' Perkins
White Hall
February 5, 1993
M . Larry Land
I tergovernmental Relations Coordinator
V'rginia Association of Counties
1 01 East Broad Street, Suite LL20
R.chmond, VA 23219-1901
D ar Mr. Land:
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Albemarle County Board
o Supervisors adopted the attached resolution urging Congress to
d'rect the Environmental Protection Agency to remove local govern-
m nts from the requirement of demonstrating financial assurance for
p blic and waste management facilities.
Very truly yours,
CcLlLLlL() CLUCA
Ella W. Carey, cleJd, CMC
E C
c The Honorable John W. Warner
The Honorable Charles S. Robb
The Honorable L. F. Payne
The Honorable Thomas J. Bliley, Jr.
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. Ban, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 9724060
Femest R Marshall. Jr
SCOlfsville
Oal.,id P. Bow rman
Ch<nlollesvil e
Charles S Martin
Rlvanna
Charlotte Y umphns
Jack Jouett
\^)alter r Perkins
White Hall
February 5, 1993
T e Honorable Charles S. Robb
U.s. Senate
R ssell Senate Building, Suite 493
W shington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Robb:
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors adopted the attached resolution urging Congress to
direct the Environmental Protection Agency to remove local govern-
ments from the requirement of demonstrating financial assurance for
p blic and waste management facilities.
Very truly yours,
~ Ui,l W CiJLLl\
~a w. Carey, Cl~k, CMC
E C
cc: The Honorable John W. Warner
The Honorable L. F. Payne
The Honorable Thomas J. Bliley, Jr.
Virginia Association of Counties
*
Printed on recycled paper
1- 29-9;;
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SUBJECT
Adopt
positio
Landfi1 s.
Financial
Assurance
of
February 3, 1993
.
CJ,?, OZO?;{ b, / )
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
VACO
of
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:----1L-
INFORMATION:
STAFF C
Messrs.
Brandenburger, Ms. Higgins
ATTACHMENTS: Yes (2)
REVIEWED BY'~
BACKGRO
Under c rrent federal regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency, privately owned
1andfi1 s are required to demonstrate financial assurance for the costs of closure, post-
closure and corrective action. These regulations will extend to public owned landfills on
April 9, 1994. This would affect the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority but not the Keene
Landfi1. VACO has adopted the attached resolution requesting Congress direct the EPA to
remove oca1 governments from the financial assurance requirements. Financial assurance from
local g vernments will impose extreme financial burden on the taxpayers with little benefit.
The pur ose of such assurance is to ensure that needed closure, post-closure and corrective
action s funded. As this occurs well after closure and the costs are significant, there is
concern that the viability of continued funding by private owners is at risk. Such risks are
not as ignificant with public ownership.
DISCUSS ON:
The att ched VACO memorandum provides additional background and requests localities adopt a
reso1ut on requesting our Congressional representatives to delete the financial assurance
require ent for public and waste management facilities.
ATION:
ch a resolution.
(Draft is attached.)
93.005
I
DRAFT
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle supports the public ownership of solid waste management
facilities through a solid waste authority; and
WHEREAS, on October 9, 1991, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency promulgated new
regulations pursuant to Subtitle D of the federal Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act which establish stringent standards for the location, design and
operation of solid waste landfills; and
WHEREAS, most of the federal Subtitle D regulations, which were developed over a period of
seven years, become effective on October 9, 1993; and
WHEREAS, these regulations will remove the exemption which now applies to local governments
in being required to demonstrate financial assurance; and
WHEREAS, financial assurance requirements will require local governments to demonstrate the
ability to meet the financial costs of closure, 30 year post-closure monitoring,
and corrective action; and
WHEREAS, financial assurance requirements are expected to impose upon local governments
extreme, and unnecessary financial burdens; and
WHEREAS, local governments will require additional time to develop strategies for meeting
financial assurance requirements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Albemarle urges Congress to direct the
United States Environmental Protection Agency to restore the exemption to local
governments in demonstrating financial assurance.
. I
Secolld Vice Pres 'dml
William H.H. B {'vins
Smyth C unt}'
Secretary- Trm 'urer
E. Virgil Samp' m Jr.
Scott C untI'
Immediate Past Pres ~dellt
Steven A. M ;raw
Roanoke C( untI'
Reg'oll 1
William E. elvin
Gloucester c: unt)'
Reg '011 2
John J Pure II Jf.
Louisa C unty
Reg 011 3
David A. Kal' hele
Henrico Cc unt)'
Arthur S. W rren
Chesterfield C nty
William 1'. Newma Jr.
Arlington Co nty
Regi 119
Charles W. C rrv
Augusta Co nty
Harper R. Wa . ner
Bath Co nty
Regi01 10
Girardus G. F rry
Franklin Co t~,
Region 12
James H. Gib on
Let. COll ty
Kenneth G. Math ws
Washington Cou ty
RepreseIltative 10 NA 0
Gerald W. Hyl d
Fairfax COll ty
Past Preside ts
Jack D. Edwa ds
James City COlI ty
W.D, C av
Richmond COLI ty
Executive Direr or
James D, Campbell, C E
General COUll el
C Flippo Hi ks
VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
~001 East Broad Street · Suite LL 20 · Richmond, Virginia 23219-1901 . (804) 788-6652~, fax (804) 788-0083
c.~, . ,
MEMORANDUM
i) 1"
Date:
l..
December 8, 1992
(
...../\
, 'I v":'
To:
Chief County Administrative officers
From:
Larry Land, Intergovernmental Relations Coor
Subject:
Attached Resolution on Financial Assurance for
Management Facilities
On November 10 the Virginia Association of Counties adopted the attached
resolution urging Congress to direct the Environmental Protection Agency to
remove local governments from the requirement of demonstrating financial
assurance for waste management facilities. Financial assurance
requirements will impose an extreme financial burden upon Virginia's local
governments and their taxpayers with very little public benefit.
Under federal regulations, financial assurance will apply to publicly owned
landfills continuing to operate (in accordance with design criteria under
RCRA Subtitle D regulations) after April 9, 1994. Virginia's current law
requires only privately owned facilities to be subject to financial assurance
requirements. In order for Virginia's law to comply with the federal
mandate, we anticipate the introduction of legislation in the 1993 General
Assembly requiring local governments to demonstrate financial assurance.
In analyzing how the costs financial assurance will affect local governments,
the following points have become major matters of concern to VACo:
.
Local governments wi!! be required to demonstrate
financial assurance in meeting the costs of closure, post
closure and corrective action.
.
Alternative mechanisms available to local governments in
demonstrating financial assurance are trust funds, surety
bonds, letters of credit, or insurance policies. All of these
alternatives will be extremely, if not prohibitively expensive
.
In complying with financial assurance requirements, the most
probable alternative for the majority of localities will be the
development of a trust fund. However, under federal
. regulations, localities will be required to make an initial
deposit of half the amount of the total funds necessary to cover
the estimated full costs of closure, post closure and corrective
action. For Winona County ( a county in Minnesota with a
population of about 47,500 people), total financial assurance
costs are calculated at $4.5 million. Winona County's monthly
deposits into this trust fund equal approximately $62,000.
Under Minnesota's program, the amount of money that must be
deposited to cover for corrective action is based upon estimates
of 65 percent of costs under a "worse case scenario."
Minnesota's current structure does not seem to fully conform
with federal requirements. If Virginia is to follow federal
rules (under our interpretation), the amount deposited in a
trust fund would need to cover full estimated costs of
corrective action. Also, on an annual basis, the size of the
deposit into the trust fund would need to increase to account for
inflation.
For the past several months, the Virginia Association of Counties and the
Virginia Municipal League have examined the feasibility of developing a joint
financial assurance pool. While we have not given up our efforts in
investigating various alternatives, we are learning that the chances of finding
practical solutions (if we act only on our own) are remote.
We are asking that you consider adoption of the enclosed resolution with
subsequent communication to your representatives in Congress.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at (804) 788-6652 if you have any
questions concerning this matter.
VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
Adopted Unanimously by the Virginia
Association of Counties on November 10, 1992
Whereas, on October 9, 1991, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
promulgated new regulations pursuant to Subtitle 0 of the federal
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act which establish stringent
standards for the location, design and operation of solid waste landfills; and
Whereas, most of the federal Subtitle 0 regulations, which were developed over
a period of seven years, become effective on October 9, 1993; and
Whereas, these regulations will remove the exemption which now applies to
local governments in being required to demonstrate financial assurance; and
Whereas, financial assurance requirements will require local governments to
demonstrate the ability to meet the financial costs of closure, 30 year
post-closure monitoring, and corrective action; and
Whereas, financial assurance requirements are expected to impose upon local
governments extreme, and unnecessary financial burdens; and
Whereas, local governments will require additional time to develop strategies
for meeting financial assurance requirements;
Now, therefore be it resolved, that the Virginia Association of Counties urges
Congress to direct the United States Environmental Protection Agency to
restore the exemption to local governments in demonstrating financial
assurance.
Edward H B 111. ..Ir
S~rllue] Mill'r
David P. Bo (~rrnCln
Charlottesvi Ie
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902~4596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 9724060
~CHreSI R Marshall..J1
Scnt1wille
Charles S Martin
RIViHlna
Charlotte Y. 1umphns
Jack Jouell
Vv'aller F Perkms
While Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
J. W. Brent, Executive Director
Albemarle County Service Authority
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC (!Jd-"
February 5, 1993
BJECT: Resolution Regarding Central Groundwater Systems
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Albemarle County Board
o Supervisors adopted the attached resolution regarding central
g oundwater systems.
C
tachment
Robert B. Brandenburger
*
Printed on recycled paper
POL ICY
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, many citizens of Albemarle County have been
ircconvenienced by the failure of central groundwater systems; and
WHEREAS, central groundwater systems have not been considered
tc be a reliable, permanent source of water for sizeable
pcpulations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
of Albemarle County, Virginia, requests that central groundwater
systems be carefully evaluated;
FURTHER, if these systems are approved, they be submitted to
tte Albemarle County Service Authority for review and comment;
AND FURTHER RESOLVED, that if requested by the Albemarle
Ccunty Service Authority, these systems be designed and constructed
irc accordance with their specifications.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing, is a true, correct copy of a policy resolution unanimously
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
at a regular meeting held on February 3, 1993.
(: 9b- \A-l ~
[,ferk, Board of cOU'ff Supervisors
/_7'''_' ....'3
,. i. '(' '--f -~~
'0, _ - I t
1\U~EMARLE COUNTY SERVICt dA~DfMy
po, Bbx l009 40l MciNTIRE RD CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA. 22902 (804) 296-58l0
)istrib ~
January 15, 1993
Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
Albemarle County Office Building
Charlottesville, Virginia
Dear Bob:
I am enclosing a resolution adopted by the Albemarle
County Service Authority's Board of Directors on December
17, 1992. We request that you place this resolution before
the Board of Supervisors at a convenient date.
ve52;urs.
J.W. Brent
Executive Director
JWB/lbt
c.c: Board of Directors
1":'7'>."":'~'
,"
f',
!,\ , ',n -r,''1
I
I
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, many citizens of Albemarle County have been
inconvenienced by the failure of central groundwater systems, and
WHEREAS, much public money has been expended connecting these
failed systems to the public water system, and
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Service Authority does not
cpnsider central groundwater systems to be a reliable, permanent
source of water for sizeable populations,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of
the Albemarle County Service Authority recommends to the Board of
S~pervisors of Albemarle County that requests for central
g~oundwater systems be carefully evaluated and, if approved,
submitted to Albemarle County Service Authority for review and
comment. and, if requested by Albemarle County Service Authority,
r~quired to be designed and constructed in accordance with
A~bemarle County Service Authority specifications.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. *
I, J . W . Brent, Secretary-Treasurer, do hereby certify the
apove to be a true and exact copy of a resolution adopted by the
Board of Directors in a regularly scheduled meeting on December 17,
1992 by a vote of
5
to
o
. r2v vf~. ~
J.W. Br t: s~cretarY-TreaSurer
-
Edward H Sa n, Jr
S<lmuei Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902~4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
SColl5ville
David P Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S Martin
RIVdl1nd
Charlot1e Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
February 5, 1993
T e Honorable Thomas J. Vanderver
M yor
C.ty of Charlottesville
P Box 911
C arlottesville, VA 22902
D ar Mr. Vanderver:
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Albemarle County Board
o Supervisors recommended the appointment of Ms. Lorraine Haney as
t e Chairperson of the Rivanna Solid Waste Citizens Advisory
C mmittee, with said term to expire on May 1, 1994. Please note
t at the Chairperson's term runs concurrently with the term of the
C airperson of the Board of Directors. Please let us know City
C uncil's action on this appointment.
Very truly yours,
E
yf !-U-!i^Ca1L:d
Ella W. Carey, Ctfrk, CMC
c George Williams
*
Printed on recycled paper
Distribut~ I'
ITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Office of the Mayor
P.O. Box 911 . Charlottesville, Virginia. 22902
Telephone 804-971-3113
January 13, 1993
Mr. David Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va. 22902
Dear Dave:
As you may be aware, there is currently a vacancy on the
Rivanna Solid Waste Advisory Committee for the joint City/
County representative who serves as Chair. The process for
filling this position is: the Board and Council vote on a
nominee of the Mayor, Vice Mayor, Chairman and Vice Chairman.
It is also my understanding that the "unofficial" policy is
to have a City resident serve as the Chair of the Advisory
Board when a County resident is the Chair of the Authority.
We would like to nominate Lorraine Haney to serve as Chair.
Ms. Haney is currently on the Committee and therefore would
bring some experience to the position.
Please let me know if you are agreeable to recommending
Ms. Haney to the Committee so we can move forward as soon as
possible.
Sincerely,
~. l~i~L,.trtA-/d-
Tom Vandever
Mayor
[,!:=-;",
M)~'~S
0;'
1_ 70..92')
......._.... S:-'.....,t..........,~---,....
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA
VPI Ext
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
Relocation
February 3, 1993
Cf3, DZ03(~-,'f)
SUBJECT
Update
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:----X-
INFORMATION:
STAFF C
Messrs.
Huff
::::::: ~
BACKGRO
At the anuary 6, 1993 meeting, Mr. Perkins had asked staff to review county owned space
which m y be available for use by VPI Extension prior to entering into a lease agreement to
provide them space in other facilities. Staff is presently working on an agreement with the
School ystem to move the Media Center out of the County Office Building into a school
facilit to create additional office space to meet the needs addressed in our long range
space n eds study. The Media Center is currently not paying rent and will be moved into
facilit.es not requiring rent so as not to have a financial impact on our operations. In
reviewi g other county owned property, there does not appear to be 3,100 to 3,500 square feet
of spac available in a location that would meet the needs of VPI Extension. The only other
facilit owned by the County is the Old Crozet Elementary School which is presently under
contrac for lease to Crossroads-Waldorf School. They are leasing the entire building which
would h ve a substantial financial impact to the County should we lose that income and have
to reno ate that building for use by Extension. The location of that property also is not
conduci e to Extension's goal of being located in a centralized location so as to serve the
needs 0 all Albemarle County residents.
As indicated in a January 6 memo, staff has been negotiating with private entities to provide
the spa e needed by VPI Extension. At this time, we have a proposal from the Albemarle
County ervice Authority to lease space to the Extension Office at a cost of $10.50 per
square oot which is certainly well within market rates for office space. This building is
to be 1 cated on South Pantops Drive, will be built to Extension's specifications, and will
provide them with the necessary parking, storage, and meeting space needed for their
operati ns. Rental at $10.50 per square foot will be $32,550 annually which, because the
space w'll not be available until December, 1993, will result in a $16,275 request in the
1993/94 Extension operating budget.
ATION:
ests Board approval to execute a lease agreement with the Albemarle County Service
Authorit for rental space for VPI Extension subject to review of the document by the County
Attorne 's Office.
93.012
.
I
ITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Office of the City Attorney
Room 303. City Hall
P.O. Box 911 · Charlottesville. Virginia . 22902
Telephone 804-971-3131
March 4, 1993
mmOOUWi'
: ii II IIIJl - 5 .
.......,
'-"\ I
; ,1 ' 1
,
t Mullaney, Director
bemarle County Parks & Recreation
1 McIntire Road
arlottesville, VA 22902
'j
ROARD OF SUPERVI~"" ,~~~~j
RE: Well Dedication at Ivy Creek Natural Area
Pat:
Enclosed is the originally signed Well Dedication document
ich is ready to be recorded. There was no written resolution or
dinance authorizing the Mayor to sign; it was approved by motion
March 1, 1993.
Per Ella Carey's request, I am forwarding a copy of the
cument to her. Let us know if we can help further with this
tter.
Sincerely,
\ ! J ."
)U ~{;-~4-
Barbara Ronan
Paralegal
E closure
c Ella Carey (wi enclosure) ~
WELL DEDICATION
E CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA and THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE,
RGINIA do dedicate a 100' x 100' portion of that tract or parcel
o real estate situated, lying and being in Albemarle County,
V.rginia, more particularly described by deed and plat of survey of
r cord in Deed Book 715, Page 644, Plat 554, Page 357, of the
C erk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia,
a d being the identical real estate which said CITY and COUNTY
a quired by grant with General Warranty of Title and Modern English
c venants from The Nature Conservancy. Said dedication being to
tablish the aforesaid area, described on the attached plat plan
well lot, for water supply use only and the said CITY and COUNTY
a ree that only appurtenances pertinent to the water supply system
w'll be constructed in said area dedicated and that said well lot
w.ll not be used for human habitation or other sources of
c ntamination.
e full interest and control of the aforesaid area dedicated shall
main with the CITY and COUNTY and this instrument is solely for
e purpose of assuring the Department of Health of the
mmonwealth of Virginia as to the matters hereinabove set forth so
ng as said parcel is used for a water supply system; and this
dication shall be null and void and of no further effect should
e well on the said premises be abandoned and the use thereof for
water supply system cease.
W TNESS the following signatures.
CITY
ARLOTTESVILLE,
JL
~w
VIRGINIA
BY:
----
TITLE:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
/.O~
BY ~~ ' __ C::V!<.,,-t:,-zA.-? ~
TITLE: /~"""- ,6' 7 S-
S ATE OF VIRGINIA ,
C TYj.COUNTY OF CAa.//..Jo~ud/~
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~
d y of ~aYch , 1993, by Thomas J. Vandever, Mayor of the City
o Charlottesville, Virginia.
My commission expires: C)une.. ~f IQr"3
~Y/1..tt xI. P tl-LI ~
Notary Public
DISTRIBUTED Tel 80AED MEMBERS
O'i .j-~:!.:.:9~__
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMAR Y
AGENDA ITLE:
Well D dication Document
Natural Area
Ivy Creek
AGENDA DATE:
February 3, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
93, 6c'O~{S;,:; J
STAFF C
Messrs.
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:----1L-
INFORMATION:
Mullaney
ATTACHMENTS: Yes ~
REVIEWED BY' jkJ!
BACKGRO
In the
that ha
supply,
lot for
x 100'
the Hea
rocess of drilling a new well at the Ivy Creek Natural Area to replace an old well
gone dry, the Health Department has advised that, because this is a public water
he owners of the property are required to record a dedication document for the well
he purpose of protecting the water supply from contamination. The well lot is 100'
s shown on the attached plat with the documents having been previously approved by
th Department and the attorneys from both the City and the county.
ATION:
ommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the attached document and
e forwarded to the City of Charlottesville for a similar approval.
93.011
Edward H K 111, Jr
Silmul'1 Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902~4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrl:'st R Marshall. Jr
SCOllsville
David P Bow rman
ChMlollesvd e
Charles S, Martin
RIVdnnd
Charlotte y, umphns
Jack Jou<?tt
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Patrick K. Mullaney, Director of Parks and Recreation
F
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC elD~
February 5, 1993
Well Dedication Document for the Ivy Creek Natural Area
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Albemarle County Board
Supervisors authorized the Chairman to execute the attached well
dication document for the Ivy Creek Natural Area. It is my
derstanding that you will forward the document to the City for
ty Council approval. Please provide this office with a copy of
e document after it has been signed by the City for our files.
C
tachment
Richard E. Huff, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
;- TATE OF VIRGINI1\
.ITY/COUNTY OF
foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
, 1993, by David P. Bowerman, Chairman of the
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia.
My commission expires:
Notar'y Public
FOR USE OF CLERK OF COURT
his Well Dedication Document, as described above, was recorded in
eed Book , Page on the day of I 1993.
. . .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Parks and Recreation Department
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5844
MEMORANDUM
: Richard E. Huff, II. Deputy County Executive
Patrick K. Mullaney, Director of Parks and Recreationf~~
January 26, 1993
Well Dedication Document - Ivy Creek Natural Area
As you know we recently had to drill a new well at the Ivy
C eek Natural Area.
Because this is a public water supply, one of the Health
D partment requirements is that the owners record a dedication
d cument for the well lot for the purpose of protecting the water
s pply from contamination.
I have drafted the enclosed well dedication document and plat
p an for this purpose. These documents have been approved by Gary
R ce at the Health Department and the City and County Attorneys.
I would appreciate your placing this item on the Board of
S pervisor's agenda so that Mr. Bowerman can be authorized to sign
f r the County. Please return the documents to me and I will
f rward them on to the City Attorney for placement on Council's
a enda.
Please call me if you have any questions.
P Isms
E closure
c
Clyde Gouldman
Gene German
COUNTY OF AlBEMAKU.
EXfCUT'VE: OffICI
.',"
.. T
DATE i ~
i - u,'~
'- ,~ '<;;. / ,
, ;/ ) --~ '.
., r',
AGENDA ITEM NO. I " (' i
.~-"'-
/ ,
~
, .~'.-. ....."
AGENDA ITEM NAME , "'- ; ~- / C , ,
.' .'1,- .~, ,..-\- , , .1.... I '" '.
,", ~,
DEFERRED "-~I r ((i l i f ~i (~7() )
UNTIL " '"", _..-:'....
, ..... If )
Form. 3
7/25/86
"
. .
r'"'' - .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Fritz, Senior Planner
Yolanda Hipski, Planner ~
Amelia G. McCulley, Zoning Administrator
October 22, 1992
RE: Towers for Cellular Phones
This is in response to your transmittal of October 5th, requesting
a determination on the zoning regulations applicable to cellular
ph ne towers. This question has arisen in conjunction with two
different proposals, one by Charlottesville Cellular (SP 92-69) and
th other by Centel Cellular.
I have consulted the County Attorney, who has responded with the
at ached letter dated October 19th. By this letter, he notes a
re ersal in his prior decision on the tower on Con Agra property,
based on our broader ordinance definition of "public utility." He
st tes that the Virginia Code does not consider a cellular
telephone system licensed by the FCC a public utility.
zoning ordinance defines a "public utility" in Section 3.0 as
y plant or equipment for the conveyance of telephone messages
" This would therefore include both of these, and'all cellular
ne companies.
As a public utility, they are subject to the following:
1) Review by the Planning Commission under Virginia Code Section
15.1-456;
2) A special permit if it is a mUlti-legged tower. (Note:
right category of use for pUblic utilities specifically
multi-legged towers.) If the tower is a monopole, it
permitted by-right, with -456 review and a site plan;
the by-
excludes
is
and
,J &
o tober 22, 1992
T wers for Cellular Phones
P ge 2
3) A site plan. This development is not exempt from the site plan
requirement (see Section 32.2.1). Supplementary regulation
5.1.12 applies to this use.
ease forward this memorandum to these two applicants. If you
ve any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact
reading file "Cellular Telephone"
.J
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney
416 Park Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Telephone 296-7138
GEORGE R ST.JOHN
COUNTY A TORNEY
JAMES M. BOWLING, IV
DEPUTY COUNTY A TIORNEY
October 19, 1992
M . Amelia McCulley
Z ning Administrator
C unty Office Building
4 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, Virginia 22902
Re: Towers (Antennae)
(Our File # ACPZ 91-978)
D Amelia:
In my opinion, under Chapter i6.2 of Title 56 of the Virginia
C de (section 56-508.8 and following sections, being the
" ellular Mobile Radio Communication Towers Act", a cellular
t lephone system licensed by the FCC is not considered a public
u ility. That is what I based my earlier opinion on, and that
i what the attorney for the company who applied for a tower on
a lot owned by Con Agra in Crozet, based his concurrence on.
However, I have just noticed that the words "public utility"
e defined on page 18 of the ordinance as including "any plant
equipment for the conveyance of telephone messages ... " .
erefore, our own definition is what we must apply in this
see
Going further, it seems to me, although I have no authority
e way or the other, that the messages you receive over a
llular telephone are "telephone messages" and if you agree,
en these companies are public utilities under our own
dinance.
However, since this is a "public facility", these towers do
s em to me to require review by the Planning Commission (with
ssible appeal to the Board of Supervisors) under Virginia Code
ction 15.1-456 which we commonly call "456 review".
:
. ~ ,
Alnelia McCulley
Page 2
October 19, 1992
I am returning the two applications from Centel Cellular and
Cnarlottesville Cellular along with this letter.
Sincerely yours,
~
George R. st. John
County Attorney
Gt1s/sw
Enclosure
Edward H Ball, Jr
Samuei Mtll€
David P. Bow rman
Charloftesvill
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charlotte Y H mphns
Jack. Jouett
February 5, 1993
Mr. John T. Sweeney
President
Earlysville volunteer Fire Department
PO Box 125
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Dear Mr. Sweeney:
Forrest R Marsh"ll. Jr
SCOIlSVllle
Charles S. Martlfl
Rivallna
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Board of Supervisors
a thorized the Chairman to sign the attached Service Agreement
ap roving the disbursement of funds to Earlysville Volunteer Fire
Co pany to purchase new firefighting vehicles.
Very truly yours,
KC
~- ~CLa ~i\J C_ -
~la w. careY~rk' CMC
Attachment
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
Melvin Breeden
*
Printed on recycled paper
THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT, made for purposes of identification,
1vd day of (t/')(UJ)JJ ' 1993, by and between the COUNTY OF
LBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), and the EARLYSVILLE VOLUNTEER
IRE COMPANY ("Earlysville");
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, the County has previously entered into service
greements with Earlysville, dated February 22, 1983, May 23, 1984,
nd May 7, 1987, providing for the withholding of certain sums each
the County from the County's annual grant to Earlysville,
forth in said agreements, copies of which are attached
ereto as Exhibits A, B, and C; and
WHEREAS, as a result of said agreements, the outstanding
.ndebtedness now totals $71,600; and
WHEREAS, Earlysville now desires to receive from the County
o Hundred Fifty-three Thousand Dollars ($253,000.00) to be used
the purchase of firefighting vehicles; and
WHEREAS, Earlysville now desires to enter into an agreement
its annual withholding of payments by the County;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the operation by
volunteer fire company which will fight fires and
otect property and human life from loss or damage by fire and the
of firefighting vehicles during the term of this
a reement, the County shall pay to Earlysville Two Hundred Fifty-
ree Thousand Dollars ($253,000.00), which payment shall be made
en needed from the County's fire fund. Thereafter, the sum of
enty-nine Thousand Five Hundred and Nine dollars ($29,509.00) per
ar shall be withheld each year from the County's annual grant to
arlysville for a period of ten (10) years beginning July 1993 and
extending through July 2002, with a balance of Twenty-nine Thousand
Five Hundred Ten Dollars ($29,510.00) due in the eleventh year
Thus, at the end of the eleventh year, which is the
of this service agreement, a total of Three Hundred Twenty-
thousand six Hundred Dollars ($324,600.00) will have been
This withholding consolidates the balance of all prior
as a result of prior service agreements with
rlysville, dated May 7, 1987, February 22, 1983, and May 23,
If at any time during the term of this agreement, Earlysville
no longer in the business of providing fire fighting services or
e firefighting vehicles are no longer used for firefighting
rposes, Earlysville covenants that it will convey its interest in
e fire-fighting vehicles, or the fire station and the property
on which it sits, as the case may be, to the County at no cost to
e County so long as the County or its assigns will use the
operty for fire-fighting purposes. All covenants set forth in
e agreements dated May 7, 1987, February 22, 1983, and May 23,
84 remain in full force and effect.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
By
OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
~
. Bowerman, Cha1rman
Supervisors
(SEAL)
EARLYSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
BY~~
c..-=; \.1, F; 2),.
(SEAL)
S ATE OF VIRGINIA
C UNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
cFj-n F I
Zl day of e..nt 0..('(J1' , 1993, by David P. Bowerman, Chairman
the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia.
commission Expires:
lic
S ATE OF VIRGINIA
C UNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
,/j(Jtf.- day ofJ/);tlt/J1/J~, 1993, by I.., A
<7\ 0 lM' l<<~ \J4)A f) 'T '=~' {}-f' I' /)~
of the Earlysville Volunteer Fire
Commission Expires:
I D - ~ 1- q:s
f<bjjju~ ~ ~ /liaW/L
otary Public
D:'<rp1~iL)-;-t:.,") ~(-.~ :: ~"I";.'u };\;':V~Gt.RS
," .(~!i:.i.:CZ~" . -, ~.
County of Albemarle
EXECUTlVE SUMMARY
AGENDA ITLE:
Volunte r Fire Company Advance
SUBJECT
Advance
Volunte
firefig
STAFF C
Messrs.
February 3, 1993
.
Q3Io2.03(S;-J7 )
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
PROPOSAL RE UEST:
of $253,000 to
r Fire Company to
ting vehicles.
Earlysville
purchase new
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:-----1L-
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
Huff
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGRO
Earlysv'lle Volunteer Fire Company has requested an advance of $253,000 from the Advanced
Allocat'on Fire Fund to purchase two fire engines.
DISCUSS ON:
This re uest has been reviewed and approved by the JCFRA Finance Committee. The agreement
has als been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office.
RECOMME ATION:
Staff r commends that the Chairman be authorized to sign the attached Service Agreement
approvi g the disbursement of funds to Earlysville Volunteer Fire Company.
93.019
THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT, made for purposes of identification,
t is day of , 1993, by and between the COUNTY OF
LBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), and the EARLYSVILLE VOLUNTEER
FIRE COMPANY ("Earlysville")i
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, the County has previously entered into service
a reements with Earlysville, dated February 22, 1983, May 23, 1984,
a d May 7, 1987, providing for the withholding of certain sums each
the County from the County's annual grant to Earlysville,
forth in said agreements, copies of which are attached
reto as Exhibits A, B, and C; and
WHEREAS, as a result of said agreements, the outstanding
debtedness now totals $71,600; and
WHEREAS, Earlysville now desires to receive from the County
o Hundred Fifty-three Thousand Dollars ($253,000.00) to be used
the purchase of firefighting vehicles; and
WHEREAS, Earlysville now desires to enter into an agreement
nsolidating its annual withholding of payments by the County;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the operation by
rlysville of a volunteer fire company which will fight fires and
otect property and human life from loss or damage by fire and the
of firefighting vehicles during the term of this
a reement, the County shall pay to Earlysville Two Hundred Fifty-
ree Thousand Dollars ($253,000.00), which payment shall be made
en needed from the County's fire fund. Thereafter, the sum of
enty-nine Thousand Five Hundred and Nine dollars ($29,509.00) per
ar shall be withheld each year from the County's annual grant to
< " I ..
arlysville for a period of ten (10) years beginning July 1993 and
xtending through July 2002, with a balance of Twenty-nine Thousand
ive Hundred Ten Dollars ($29,510.00) due in the eleventh year
July 2003). Thus, at the end of the eleventh year, which is the
of this service agreement, a total of Three Hundred Twenty-
thousand six Hundred Dollars ($324,600.00) will have been
ithheld. This withholding consolidates the balance of all prior
dvancements as a result of prior service agreements with
arlysville, dated May 7, 1987, February 22, 1983, and May 23,
1984.
If at any time during the term of this agreement, Earlysville
no longer in the business of providing fire fighting services or
e firefighting vehicles are no longer used for firefighting
rposes, Earlysville covenants that it will convey its interest in
e fire-fighting vehicles, or the fire station and the property
on which it sits, as the case may be, to the County at no cost to
e County so long as the County or its assigns will use the
operty for fire-fighting purposes. All covenants set forth in
e agreements dated May 7, 1987, February 22, 1983, and May 23,
84 remain in full force and effect.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
By
David P. Bowerman, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
(SEAL)
EARLYSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
BY~~
cP~~
6-; \./ , r:; 2)..
(SEAL)
.~TATE OF VIRGINIA
(~OUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of
, 1993, by David P. Bowerman, Chairman
c~f the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia.
l~y commission Expires:
Notary Public
l TATE OF VIRGINIA
(~OUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
/)(f'ff.- day ofJ/)"""al/lJ-i/""', 1993, by
c7\ 0 (.Uj,(.{ ~ ,-j,aj,f) "7. <),<.)jJI'/)~
of the Earlysville Volunteer Fire
(~ompany .
J Y Commission Expires:
I D - ,.3 / - CIS
fit Wu~ ~, /UaJdu,--
otary Public
~D' . . /' - '/9-<{'::<"
lstnbu!r..! tn Road: ___:=--~
Agel ':' ~lo. ,-.!t~._~)Z02i...s";f)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D, PE HTEL
COM MISS I NER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
POBOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
January 21, 1993
Route 708
Request for Guardrail
la W. Carey, Clerk
of Supervisors
Office Building
Intire Road
ttesville, VA 22902
Dear
Carey:
t their January 12, 1993, meeting the Board requested that the Department consider
ling guardrail along Route 708 on the curve just west of its intersection with 631.
reviewed this location and this is my report to the Board of Supervisors.
have determined that sufficient shoulder exists to install guardrail at this
locat'on. The length which qualifies for guardrail due to height of fill is about 1,000'
long. I estimate it will cost approximately $11,300 to install guardrail at this
location.
hile I understand there have been a number of unreported accidents in this area,
official records do not support this location being particularly accident prone. For
this reason I do not believe special safety funds are available for the installation of
guardrail at this location. Certainly secondary improvement funds allocated for use in
Albe rle County could be used for this purpose. If the board feels this potential
problem is of such a magnitude that secondary improvement funds should be used, I will
include an allocation in the 1993-94 budget. I request that this information be relayed
to the Board of Supervisors and that they advise me concerning their desire prior to the
adoption of a secondary improvement budget for next year.
Yours truly,
~'~~O:"S2:V~tv--
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DSR/ mk
cc: G. D. Lipscomb
T. G. Kennedy
J. S. Hores
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
t-. ~ "
. ,. -. J - 77 -7' :.3
Oistributed 'fJ 8oiHd: -L-5;;;:;..~
Agel),), flA,O?Q;~f.5/1)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. P THTEl
COMMISSI NER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND. 23219
, ~\
January 20, 1993
Project 6029-002-122-RV201
Proposed Charlottesville Bypass
.r. David Kalergis
701 Barracks Road
harlottesville, Virginia 22901-2033
Mr. Kalergis:
This is in response to your January 11 letter outlining your understanding
f the Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT's) position as it relates
o your property. Your summation of the situation is accurate. The Department
s currently seeking bids to have the project designed and plans on holding a
ublic hearing sometime in 1996.
Should you advise me that your property has been removed from the
gricultural district, I will recommend to the Commonwealth Transportation Board
as promised) that the alignment be changed. Vhen approved and once the area to
e acquired has been determined, if your personal circumstances allow you to
ualify under our hardship policy, VDOT will proceed to acquire your property.
Please keep me advised pertaining to the status of your property.
S~elY, /; ~ /1/ '"
pt:t~~~' i\Y. /;:I~~.:(&L
{:!
Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner
c: Mrs. Constance R. Kincheloe
Mr. David P. Bowerman
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
. .'
David G. and Mary M. Kalergis
Sugarday Farm
2901 Barracks Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
(804) 296-1558
IC)L/()
...
anuary 11, 1993
S\ONE.R:S.
COMNUS
\ 2. \99),
J p.\'\
OFF\CE.
ay D. Pethtel, Commissioner
irginia Department of Transportation
401 East Broad street
ichmond, Virginia 23219
ear Mr. Pethtel:
hank you for your letters and time spent discussing the location
f the proposed Charlottesville Bypass. Because this may have
uch a serious effect on my family, I would like to summarize my
derstanding of our discussions. If this understanding is
orrect, Mary and I will ask that our property, Sugarday Farm, be
ithdrawn from the Ivy Creek Agricultural and Forestal District
o that the road can be relocated on to it. I will also use this
etter, and your confirmation, to explain the situation to our
ankers.
ary and I understand that the withdrawal of our property from
he Agricultural District will allow you to recommend to the
ommonwealth Transportation Board that the present proposed
lignment for the Bypass be shifted to the west, on to our
roperty. This revised alignment will result in the displacement
f fewer families in the Montvue subdivision, a straighter road,
nd reduced engineering/construction costs. However, the new
lignment will definitely require the taking of our house, and
ome portion, although not all, of our acreage. The purchase
rice will be the fair market value of the buildings and that
art of the property taken, as valued at the time of the
urchase.
ecause the purchase will be a "partial take" rather than a
'whole take," the property is not now eligible for acquisition
nder existing VDOT regulations. After the highway design has
een completed and approved, the acquisition process can begin
ccording to your rules and guidelines. Approval of the final
esign is by the decision of the Commonwealth Transportation
oard, after a design public hearing. This design and approval
rocess, which will show the exact boundaries and required
asements for the property to be purchased by you, is expected to
ake about 2 or 3 years.
fter the highway design has been completed and approved, I
nderstand that you will work with us to buy the property under
n accelerated timetable in the event of financial hardship
aused by the location of this road (including an inability to
sell the house for its fair value in the event we need to put it
n the market.) Under appropriate circumstances, after the
cquisition VDOT will consider leasing the house back to us until
e property is needed for highway construction purposes.
. .
.
.
~
~,
Pethtel, January, 1993, Page 2
s I mentioned above, Mary and I are ready to ask for the
ithdrawal of Sugarday Farm from the Agricultural and Forestal
istrict. Upon your confirmation that we correctly understand
he situation, I will make the voluntary withdrawal request. I
hink it will take a month or two for the request to be finally
onsidered, but I don't anticipate any problems with this.
ank you for your time and your willingness to work with us on
is matter. I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely yours,
vid G. Kalergis
Constance Kincheloe
David Bowerman
..
~ ~'G3
,ute" ;0 Bo.. I--...?_Z:",,L
:a Ittri; , ). _~~, 6z..r;;,J.,~,~-dO )
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PETH El
COM MISS lONE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND,23219
EARL G. COCHRAN. JR.
STATE LOCATION AND DESIGN ENGINEER
January 15, 1993
Route: 743
proj: 0743-002-153,
C-502
Albemarle County
Fr: Route 657
To: Route 631
lerk of the Court
Ibemarle County
01 McIntire Road
harlottesville, Virginia 22901
Attached is a Public Notice and Map advising of a proposed
ighway improvement project.
Should you desire additional information or have any questions
r comments concerning this highway matter, please refer to the
bove project number and description when you contact this office.
Sincerely,
(
E. C. Cochran, Jr., P.E.
State Location and Design Engineer
f\\/ . G~
\,j\ \\.,
Q'). J~\~ ~~ . 'c .~.\ -;\'..t-
~.,J . . ,,:,,\(\:'-'~~-<.'~~r. t
.",.,':J','I \ ~\ \..1"'"
,.." 1\ '. \.. \.,-
d'~""
f~ ~r
S\\t.~
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
~i
~
. "
..
LD-4-93
PUB L I C NOT ICE
PROPOSED HIGHWAY PROJECT
ROUTE 743
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
Representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) will hold a Location and Design Public Hearing on Thursday
March 11, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. in the Jack Jouett Middle School
located on Lambs Road (Rte. 657) approximately 0.2 mile west of
Route 743 behind the Albemarle High School in Albemarle, Virginia.
VDOT representatives will also be present at the above
lpcation on Thursday, March 11, 1993 from 4:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M.
fpr an informal review of available information by interested
c~ tizens. All interested persons are encouraged to review the
p~oposal prior to the formal hearing.
The purpose of this Public Hearing will be to consider the
p~oposed location and design of Route 743 from Route 657 to Route
6~1 in Albemarle County.
At this location and design public hearing, relocation
a~sistance programs and tentative schedules for right of way
acquisition and construction will also be discussed.
All interested parties are urged to attend and give the
D~partment their comments and suggestions relative to the proposed
h~ghway improvement.
I
. '
P~JBLIC NOTICE
-2-
Maps, drawings, and other information are available for public
r~view in the Department of Transportation's District Office
located on Route 15 (Business just south of Route 3 in Culpeper)
and in it's Residency Office located on Route 250 three miles east
o~ Charlottesville in Albemarle County.
Written statements and other exhibits relative to the proposed
plroject may be presented in place of, or in addition to, oral
s~atements at the hearing. Such written statements and exhibits
m~y also be submitted to the Department at any time within ten days
a~ter the public hearing.
Individuals requiring special assistance
p~rticipate in this meeting should contact the
R~sident Engineer at (804) 296-5102.
to attend and
Charlottesville
"\,.~" Y'<ginia """""men' o' r,an_na'lon
J~nuary 15, 1993
.-
657
110
659
HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT'
ROUTE 743
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
PROJECT: 0743-002-153, C-502
ftu:.RAL PROJECT: NONE
FROM: I N1: LAMBS RD.(RTE 6e7)
TO: IN1: RIO RD. CRTE.631)
LENGTH: 0.657 MILES
'fiiiIt ~
I
1320
I
2640
c;~;:- j"~,.= ;.... 'j ~ '-
,".) /;:,:../....\0;:;\.:;
(,,'. ,--j_~;( 9-73-
-~-...'"--......._...._~
County of Albemarle
EXECUTlVE SUMMAR Y
SUBJECT
statements by Ms.
Connie
February 3, 1993
93, 0;) 0 .3 I'; / I j
AGENDA T
Summary
Kinchloe
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
Constance
Commonwealth
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:~
ATTACHMENTS:
None
STAFF CO
Messrs.
Brandenburger
REVIEWED BY' pr--
BACKGRO
Ms. Kinc was the guest speaker at the North Charlottesville Business Council meeting on
January 6, 1993 at which she provided information on three issues: (1) Study of Route #29
North b tween the entrance of the proposed by-pass to Warrenton, (2) Grade separated
intercha ges on 29N, and (3) By-pass planning. This information reflected the earliest dates
VDOT st ff could commence staff work assumina the fundina were available for the various
projects. Current road budgets do not support this planning schedule. Ms. Kinchloe prefaced
her rem rks that the Commonwealth Transportation Board and VDOT were committed to the
agreemen reached with the City, University and county.
DISCUSSI
Ms. Kinc
addressed the following timelines:
· d of Rt. 29N to Warrenton: This is associated with Rt. 29 being identified in the
eral Highway System as one of many corridors of special interest. Federal funding
wa available to states to undertake studies of these corridors. Virginia obtained
$1.5 million to begin the study of this section of Route 29.
· de Se arated Interchan es: Propose to advertise for a consultant in February, 1993
lowed by a notice to proceed in June, 1993; Design public hearing in February, 1995;
for detail design in May, 1995; Contract to build in November, 1996. Estimated
ts for the 3 interchanges at Hydraulic Road, Greenbrier Drive and Rio Road is $45
lion.
rationale for proceeding to a design/location public hearing phase is to establish
detailed footprint to allow VDOT to deal with additional hardship cases and to
ence purchase of right-of-way. It was emphasized that these events are predicated
the availability of funding.
· Pass: Propose a notice to proceed in July, 1993; Design public hearing in May,
6; Advertise to build in october, 1997. Estimated cost is $110 million. Two issues
t must be completed are additional studies for (1) the location and Environmental
act Statements for a north grounds connector, and (2) a location and Environmental
act Study for an alternative access to Route 29N that would shift from the current
ess near Kegler's to a point north of the South Rivanna River that would align with
Route 29 access to the Meadowcreek Parkway.
RECOMME
None, pr
information.
93.015
NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
Distributed t'J 803rd: j-2q-13
Agenda Item No. 9~5, 6263 ( s.. (~ )
..
~
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Law Department
Three Commercial Place
Norfolk, Virginia 23510-2191
Richard W. Kienle
Senior General Attorney
Writer's Direct Dial Number
(804) 629-2878
January 11, 1993
ERTIFIED MAIL -
ETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED
,\ \.
r. David P. Bowerman, Chairman
oard of SupGrvisors of Albemarle County
01 McIntire Road
harlottesville, Virginia 22901
Re: Case No. RRR920006
ear Sir:
I enclose a true copy of the Virginia state Corporation
ommission's order concerning the application of Norfolk Southern
ailway Company to close the Charlottesville, Virginia, agency.
Yours very truly,
#V~
Richard W. Kienle
WK/sg
nclosure
Operating SubSidiaries Norfolk Southern Railway Company / North American Van lines, Inc
. .
~
~
roMMoNWEALm OF VIRGINIA 9 21220 118
If
If
STAlE CORPORATION COMMISSION
... :'"', :I.,.I:-PT rn~ 'TR' 0'
J ut,,'J 1l...1'I, \.,1"...;... \ _
AT RICHMOND, DECEMBER 8, 1992
PLICATION OF
ORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
CASE NO.
or authority to close the
arlottesville, Virginia agency
nd place Charlottesville under
he jurisdiction of the agency
t Manassas, Virginia
ORDER REOUIRING NOTICE OF APPLICATION
In an application filed with the State Corporation
ommission on November 30, 1992, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
requests authority to close its Charlottesville, Virginia
and transfer the agency work to its agency at Manassas,
irginia. The application also seeks to change the
lassification of Charlottesville from agency status to non-
gency status. The non-agency stations controlled by
harlottesville are Orange, Montpelier, Somerset, Barboursville,
ilbert, Proffit, North Garden, Covesville and Arrington. This
pplication also proposes to transfer these stations to the
jurisdiction of the Manassas agency.
IT APPEARING to the Commission that NS should be directed to
of its application; and
IT FURTHER APPEARING that the public should be afforded the
portunity to file written comments concerning the application
a formal hearing before the Commission on any
s bstantive objection which cannot be presented effectively in
iting; accordingly,
,'. '
~
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) That the Commission's Division of Railroad Regulation
investigate this application and file, on or before April 2,
1993, an original and five (5) copies of any comments or
recommendations it has to offer concerning this application and
simultaneously send a copy thereof to NSi
(2) That, on or before January 22, 1993, KS file with the
Commission an original and ten (10) copies ot any additional
testimony and exhibits of any witnesses it proposes to offer in
support of its application;
(3) That any person who desires to file written comments
~oncerning the application or request a formal hearing on a
.ubstantive objection which cannot be presented effectively in
~iting file, on or before February 22, 1993, an original and
'ive (5) copies of such comments or requests for hearing with the
~lerk, state Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control Center,
P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216 and simUltaneously send a
~opy thereof to Richard W. Kienle, Senior General Attorney,
~orfolk Southern Railway Company, Three Commercial Place,
~orfolk, Virginia 23510;
(4) That KS forthwith post a true copy of this Order in a
l~onspicuous place in its station building at Charlottesville,
"irginia;
(5) That the NS, on or before January 22, 1993, cause to be
lerved a true copy of this Order on the Chairman, Board of
~upervisors and County Administrators for Albemarle and Orange
county and the Mayor, Cities of Charlottesville and Orange,
2
... .
Virginia, such service be made by personal delivery, or by
certified .ail, return receipt requested, to the customary place
of business or the residence of the person served;
(6) That, on or before January 22, 1993, HS provide a true
copy of this Order, by personal delivery or by first-class mail
to their last known business address, to all shippers or
receivers who have obtained service through the Charlottesville
agency wi thin the past two years, and that HS furniah to the
Division of Railroad Regulation a list of all such shippers and
receivers on or before February 14, 1993;
(7) That NS, on or before January 22, 1993, cause the
following notice to be published in a newspaper or newspapers
having general ~irculation in the affected area:
PUBLIC NOTICE
~lic notice is hereby given of an
application filed with the State Corporation
Commission by the Norfolk Southern Railway
Company (-Applicant-). Applicant requests
authority to close its Charlottesville,
Virginia agency and transfer the agency work
to its agency at Manassas, Virginia. The
application also seeks to change the
classification of Charlottesville from agency
status to non-agency status. The non-agency
stations controlled by Charlottesville are
orange, Montpelier, Somerset, Barboursville,
Gilbert, Proffit, North Garden, Covesville
and Arrington. This application proposes
that these stations be placed under the
juriSdiction of the Manassas agency.
Any person desiring to file written
comments concerning the application or a
request for a formal hearing on an objection
which cannot be presented effectively in
writing shall, on or before February 22,
1993, send an original and five (5) copies of
such co..ents to the Clerk, State Corporation
Commission c/o Document Control Center, P.O.
Box 2118, RiChmond, Virginia 23216. Copies
3
.....
of such co..ents or request for hearing must
also be sent simultaneously to Richard W.
Kienle, Senior General Attorney, Norfolk
Southern Railway Company, Three Commercial
Place, Norfolk, Virginia 23510.
A request for hearing .ust state a
substantive objection to the application and
the reasons it cannot be presented
effectively in writing. If the Commission
does not receive any proper request for
bearing, it may rule on the application
without a hearing.
Further information concerning the
application Bay be obtained fro. William E.
Elmore, Director, Division of Railroad
Regulation, P.O. Box 1197, Richmond, Virginia
23209, or by telephoning (804) 786-3682.
(8) That proof of the foregoing publication be furnished to
the Commission by the NS on or before Pebruary 19, 1993; and
(9) That an attested copy of this Order be mailed by the
Clerk of the Co_ission, CERTIPIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT
REQUESTED, to Richard W. Kienle, Senior General Attorney, Norfolk
Southern Railway Company, Three Commercial Place, Norfolk,
Virginia 23510.
ATf:t.:~~. J. a...:.I.&1a
'- Clerk of the ' r~
-~~.~ . Stat.CotporatiQn Cornmlllloft ~
"'.~:
4
Edward H Sai , Jr
Samuei Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
i--onesl R Marshall. .Jr
Scotts\:llle
Charles S, Martin
RI\;anna
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
February 8, 1993
T e Honorable V. Earl Dickinson
R ute #4, Box 560
M'neral, Virginia 23117
D ar Delegate Dickinson:
T e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on February 3, 1993,
u animously endorsed Dr. Susan McLeod's memorandum of January 6, 1993 concerning
1 cal Health Department budget concerns. It is the Board's strong feeling that
t e Health Department needs to create an additional environmental health
s ecialist (sanitarian) to meet local needs in order to keep delays for well and
s ptic permits at a manageable level. As you have been made aware, applications
f r well and septic system permits have increased considerably and is an issue
t at the Board feels should be addressed in a timely manner. As Dr. McLeod
i dicates, no state funds are necessary to meet her request, but rather an
a ditional position be authorized to be funded from non-state revenue sources.
Y ur consideration and support of this important issue is most appreciated.
Sincerely,
G-
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D
9
c The Honorable Watkins M. Abbitt
The Honorable R. Edward Houck
The Honorable Edgar S. Robb
The Honorable Mitchell Van Yahres
The Honorable Peter T. Way
Dr. Susan L. McLeod
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Edward H Ba n, ,it
Samuel Mill T
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall, Jr
Scnt!svllle
David P. Bow rm,Hl
Charlottesvil e
ChCHlcs S Martin
RI\'dnn~
Charlotte Y umphrls
Jack Jouett
Walter F PerklTls
White Hall
February 8, 1993
Honorable R. Edward Houck
O. Box 7
tsylvania, Virginia 22553
T e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on February 3, 1993,
u animously endorsed Dr. Susan McLeod's memorandum of January 6, 1993 concerning
1 cal Health Department budget concerns. It is the Board's strong feeling that
t e Health Department needs to create an additional environmental health
s ecialist (sanitarian) to meet local needs in order to keep delays for well and
s ptic permits at a manageable level. As you have been made aware, applications
f r well and septic system permits have increased considerably and is an issue
t at the Board feels should be addressed in a timely manner. As Dr. McLeod
dicates, no state funds are necessary to meet her request, but rather an
ditional position be authorized to be funded from non-state revenue sources.
Y ur consideration and support of this important issue is most appreciated.
Sincerely,
~
Bowerman
D
9
c The Honorable Watkins M. Abbitt
The Honorable V. Earl Dickinson
The Honorable Edgar S. Robb
The Honorable Mitchell Van Yahres
The Honorable Peter T. Way
Dr. Susan L. McLeod
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H Bn n, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 9724060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
SC0!lwtlle
DavId P Bow rman
Charlollesvil f:!
Charles S Martm
Rl'vanna
Charlotte Y umphfls
Jack ,JOUCH
Walter F Perkins
Whitt' Hall
February 8, 1993
T e Honorable Edgar S. Robb
1 0 Court Square Terrace, Suite B
C arlottesville, Vir~i~~ 22901
D ar ..softat.er Rosb. ~ _
T e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on February 3, 1993,
u animously endorsed Dr. Susan McLeod's memorandum of January 6, 1993 concerning
1 cal Health Department budget concerns. It is the Board's strong feeling that
t e Health Department needs to create an additional environmental health
s ecialist (sanitarian) to meet local needs in order to keep delays for well and
s ptic permits at a manageable level. As you have been made aware, applications
f r well and septic system permits have increased considerably and is an issue
t at the Board feels should be addressed in a timely manner. As Dr. McLeod
i dicates, no state funds are necessary to meet her request, but rather an
a ditional position be authorized to be funded from non-state revenue sources.
Y ur consideration and support of this important issue is most appreciated.
Sincerely,
(~'/
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/dbm
9 .01O-D
c The Honorable Watkins M. Abbitt
The Honorable V. Earl Dickinson
The Honorable R. Edward Houck
The Honorable Mitchell Van Yahres
The Honorable Peter T. Way
Dr. Susan L. McLeod
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
(i
Printed on recycled paper
David P Bow rman
Charlotlesvill,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. oJ,
C,rOll5vllle
Edward H. Ban, ,Jr
Samuel Mille
Chdrles S Martlll
Ki'v'(lI1'H
Charlotte Y umphfls
Jack Jouett
Walter F PerkIns
White Hall
February 8, 1993
T e Honorable Mitchell Van
4 8 Altamont Circle
C arlo~~V;:;g~inia
D ar Bel~gate Van ri:ih~
Yahres
22901
T e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on February 3, 1993,
u animously endorsed Dr. Susan McLeod's memorandum of January 6, 1993 concerning
1 cal Health Department budget concerns. It is the Board's strong feeling that
t e Health Department needs to create an additional environmental health
s ecialist (sanitarian) to meet local needs in order to keep delays for well and
s ptic permits at a manageable level. As you have been made aware, applications
f r well and septic system permits have increased considerably and is an issue
t at the Board feels should be addressed in a timely manner. As Dr. McLeod
dicates, no state funds are necessary to meet her request, but rather an
ditional position be authorized to be funded from non-state revenue sources.
Y ur consideration and support of this important issue is most appreciated.
Sincerely,
,;/~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D
9
c The Honorable Watkins M. Abbitt
The Honorable V. Earl Dickinson
The Honorable R. Edward Houck
The Honorable Edgar S. Robb
The Honorable Peter T. Way
Dr. Susan L. McLeod
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Edward H B In. Jr
Samuel Mil er
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 229024596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 9724060
Forrest R_ Marshall. Jr
Sco!:S\Jdle
DavId P _ Bo €rman
Charloflesvi Ie
Chorles S Martin
Rlvanna
Charlotte Y umphns
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
Whll~ Hall
February 8, 1993
T e Honorable Peter T. Way
1 0 Court Square Terrace, Suite G
C arlottesvil1e, Virginia 22902
D ar Deleg::lt-", wayt.~/~,
T e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on February 3, 1993,
u animously endorsed Dr. Susan McLeod's memorandum of January 6, 1993 concerning
1 cal Health Department budget concerns. It is the Board's strong feeling that
t e Health Department needs to create an additional environmental health
s ecialist (sanitarian) to meet local needs in order to keep delays for well and
s ptic permits at a manageable level. As you have been made aware, applications
f r well and septic system permits have increased considerably and is an issue
t at the Board feels should be addressed in a timely manner. As Dr. McLeod
i dicates, no state funds are necessary to meet her request, but rather an
a ditional position be authorized to be funded from non-state revenue sources.
Y ur consideration and support of this important issue is most appreciated.
Sincerely,
/
/L-Y~/
{/,.
'---'David P.
Chairman
Bowerman
D BJdbm
9 .010-F
c The Honorable Watkins M. Abbitt
The Honorable V. Earl Dickinson
The Honorable R. Edward Houck
The Honorable Edgar S. Robb
The Honorable Mitchell Van Yahres
Dr. Susan L. McLeod
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H Ba n, ,Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forresl R Marshall. Jr
Scnllwtlle
David P. Bow rman
Charlollesvill
Charles S Martll1
HiV2111r1il
Charlotte Y umphfls
Jack Jouett
Vv'all\::'r F Perkins
Whjle 1-1<111
February 8, 1993
T e Honorable Watkins M. Abbitt, Jr.
P. O. Box 683
A pomattox, Virginia 24522
D ar Delegate Abbitt:
e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on February 3, 1993,
animously endorsed Dr. Susan McLeod's memorandum of January 6, 1993 concerning
cal Health Department budget concerns. It is the Board's strong feeling that
e Health Department needs to create an additional environmental health
ecialist (sanitarian) to meet local needs in order to keep delays for well and
ptic permits at a manageable level. As you have been made aware, applications
r well and septic system permits have increased considerably and is an issue
at the Board feels should be addressed in a timely manner. As Dr. McLeod
dicates, no state funds are necessary to meet her request, but rather an
ditional position be authorized to be funded from non-state revenue sources.
Y ur consideration and support of this important issue is most appreciated.
Sincerely,
V)~~
~David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D BJdbm
9 .OlO-A
c The Honorable V. Earl Dickinson
The Honorable R. Edward Houck
The Honorable Edgar S. Robb
The Honorable Mitchell Van Yahres
The Honorable Peter T. Way
Dr. Susan L. McLeod
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
(
.
"
..':"r .
IN COOPER TION WITH THE
STATEDEPAR MENTOFHEALTH
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINtA bistri'buted to Boa~/-Z9.q3_
Thomas Jefferson Health District AgeR8iJt~[~ liloH~~~~,~~~(.,}~(3)
FLUVANNA COUNTY (PALMYRA)
1138 Rose Hill Drive GREENE COUNTY (STANARDSVILLE)
LOUISA COUNTY (LOUISA)
P. 0. Box 7546 NELSON COUNTY (LOVINGSTON)
Charlottesville, Virginia 22906
(804) 972-6219
ME ORANDUM
TO:
Delegates Van Yahres, Way, Dickinson, Abbitt
Senators Robb and Houck
CLIA (Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act) is federal
islation which now requires extensive and expensive improvements
any laboratory or other facility which performs even some of the
t basic testing of human specimens for diagnostic purpose. The
ached fact sheet demonstrates the needs of the entire state
Ith department for the least expensive methods of compliance.
these funds are not provided by a budget amendment, the cost of
pliance must be taken from the level funding provided for the
1 th services we provide. Health care services are in increasing
and from public health clinics and our patients cannot afford
us to reduce those services in order to fund compliance with
ne federal regulations.
Susan L. McLeod, MD, MPH, DirectoJifi'-
Thomas Jefferson Health District~'
E: January 6, 1993
Local Health Department State Budget Concerns
I want to make you aware of two crucial omissions from the
ernor's proposed budget which will have direct impact on the
Ith department services which residents of your districts
eive. The State Health Department requested resources to meet
se needs but the Governor did not include them in this budget.
The need for more environmental health specialists
(s nitarians) for timely processing of applications for well and
se tic system permits is acute in this district and in several
ot ers around the state. The state health department feels that a
mi of 16 new positions are needed now. Without these
po itions, permit delays cannot improve and will get worse as
ap Ii cations increase. Although including in the budget the
''IIDH VIRGI~IA
'I , DEPARTME~T
OF HEALTH
PrU/f'1 tin~ }rw .md h'llr Em irOnml'f11
,
.
st~te' s share of the cost of the positions would be the most
he~pful, authorization for the positions even without any state
mo~ey would help where fee revenue and local government funds can
support the positions. I have the money to add a position now to
he~p meet the needs in this district but the state health
de~artment is unable to authorize the creation of that new position
bepause the department as a whole is at its maximum employment
li~i t (MEL).
Your help with either or both of these issues is needed.
Pl~ase contact me if you need more information.
May I also thank you in advance for anything you can do to
ra~se the pay of our state employees. Because of elimination of
melri t pay and non-funding of performance pay, many longer term
embloyees are now making less than more recently hired staff.
Pl~ase do whatever you can for these faithful employees.
Thank you for your consideration of these issues.
SL~/sdr
cc: County Supervisors
City Councillors
At~achment
CLINICAL LABORATORY IMPROVEMENT AMENDMENTS OF 1988
In 1988 Congress passed the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment of 1988 (CllA) which established
Federal requirements for the regulation and certification of virtually all clinical laboratories performing testing
of bum n specimens for diagnosis and treatment.
CLIA
III the
of all
8 was a result of public and congressional concerns regarding the quality of clinical laboratory testing
.s. CLIA was enacted to assure that Americans receive high quality, reliable testing in laboratories
ypes and sizes throughout the nation.
The fin regulations had set minimum standards to ensure safety and accuracy of lab devices and procedures
for qua ity control and quality assurance requirements. Proficiency testing (PT) is required to measure accuracy
of pe ormance and to identify training needs. Personnel standards are to assure appropriate training and
for laboratory workers.
are required to register with HCF A and pay a regis~ration fee. Laboratories will also be required
costs of HCF A inspections. TIle CLIA rule has established sanctions if all aspects of the
regulati ns are not in compliance. Medicare, Medicaid, and WIC reimbursement are tied to CLIA certification.
Any fa ility performing laboratory testing without a certificate will not be eligible for reimbursement. Also, past
reimbur ments may be affected and may have to be refunded in there is a failure to comply. A laboratory
that fai s two consecutive or two of three testing events will be subject to sanctions for that specialty or test.
There '11 be additional costs for on site monitoring or hearings. Penalties for conducting laboratory tests
where he patients health is in jeopardy (as defined by CLIA) are also included.
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENTS
All Vir inia Department of Health laboratories will be federally regulated for the first time under CLIA and
will ne d additional resources to support their efforts to comply with these regulations. TIle clinical laboratory
is an portant component of the health-care system that touches on all aspects of the Virginia Department
of Hea th's mission. Over one million lahoratory tests are performed annually in 169 public health locations.
BUDGET IMPACT
The b dgetary impact on the Department of Health was determined by assessmg the cost of each of the
require ents of CLIA using the experience of other states and our discussions with the Department of
Consoli ated Laboratory Services (DCLS). TIle five areas identified are personnel and training, fees, reference
material, quality control, and proficiency testing. Assumptions were made that would fulfill the requirements,
but mi imize the financial impact on the Health Department.
1. Personnel and Training:
The CLIA require that each laboratory employ a Director who meets certain educational and training
requirements. For most District Health Departments the lab director can be the District Health
Directors. Meeting the requirement to provide 20 Units of Continuing Medical Education will require
an initial expenditure of 580.000.
..
For the laboratories in the other Districts that perfonn tests of high
greater since the regulations require a qualified laboratory director.
per lab or $120.000.
complexity, the requirements are
This cost is estimated at $10,000
Current Laboratory personnel and supervisors would also need training in order to meet the InlnlIDUm
requirements of CUA. Education costs for lab staff and approximately 500 nurses and nursing
assistants will be approximately $50000.
A Technical Consultant must be available for each laboratory. A Technical Consultant can be shared
by many laboratories. In order to make a Technical Consultant available to all State Health
Department laboratories, four positions would be established. These positions would be housed in Labs
located in four different geographical areas of the state. Each Technical Consultant would serve about
8 laboratories. TIle estimated cost of these four positions is $200 000.
2. Enforcement Fee:
TIle enforcement of CLIA regulations IS to be supported. by fees charged to laboratories. TIlese fees
are estimate at $74935,
3. Reference Material:
Reference and record keeping materials are required 10 order to demonstrate compliance with CLIA. '
TIlis expense is estimated at $73 500,
4, Quality Control:
CLIA requires that laboratories maintain quality by implementing quality control measures. TIle total
new cost of this activity is estimated at So 19 300.
5. Proficiency Testing:
TIle purpose of proficiency testing is to ensure that testing personnel are reporting the correct results.
The new cost of proficiency testing is detennined to be S132.587.
Of the request, $128,088 has been identified as first year costs only. The remainder of $1,222,300
is the estimate for Fiscal Year 1995 and beyond.
BUDGET SUMMARY:
1. Personnel:
2. Enforcement Fee:
3. Reference Material:
4; Quality Control:
5. Proficiency Testing:
S 50,000
74,935
73,500
619,366
132.587
Total Budget Addendum Needed S 1,350,388
State General
Fund
60.22%
S 813,203
Non-General
Fund
39.78%
$ 537,184
Distributed to Board: L- Z (j-9 ~
u N I V E R S I T Y 0 F V I R AgendClltem ;.;,) 9.3. 0263,(SII<!-)
GIN 1 ~-------'--_.-
S C H 0 0 L 0 F A R C H I T E C T U R E
January 21, 1993
RE:
_.
Persons interested in Shenandoah National Park Related
Lands Study
Jim Klein, Project Director Shenandoah National Park
Related Lands Study
Open Houses in Elkton and Crozet
TO:
FROM:
Two open houses will be held in Rockingham and Albemarle Counties
to review the final draft inventory maps prepared for the Related
Lands Study.
These open houses, similar to the ones held last spring, are a chance
to drop In at your convenience to spend as much time as needed
looking at the inventory maps. Members of the University of
Virginia study team and representatives of the Shenandoah National
Park will be available to answer questions and receive comments
regarding the content of the maps.
The open houses will be held at the following dates and times:
Feb. 6, 1993 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Elkton Intermediate School cafeteria on Route 33
Feb. 13, 1993 ALBEMARLE COUNTY 1 p.m. to 4 p. m.
Crozet Elementary School cafeteria on Route 810
For further information about the study or about the open houses,
please contact Jim Klein, (804)-924-6438 or Sandy Rives, (703)-999-
3300, Management Assistant of Shenandoah National Park.
We hope that you will be able to attend and ask that you let friends
and associates know about the open houses so that they, too, can
view the maps and discuss them informally with members of the
study team.
AR(:HITECTlIRE. IANDS(",\PF ARC:\-lj IT.\'TlfRF . .\RC1IJ lr,I:'l!I\,;\L lil.\ Il)!I.\ ~ l-HIL\~~\Nj) FNV j{()~<,\11'~lA: :'~1~;(
(:AMPBFLL IIALI . UN!\FR~)IT\ nr \'!H,,! Nj/,.. ~j{\lZJ.\)TrF.S\!!; 1.. \!j.:;;JN]~ .'.~');' . k(l-'l <i}if \
.
/-?Q ,).--,
. -.: I'to aan: I C- , - i' :5
-'-"'.-, --" -~"""
\ c.J. ') 2. ~)
('P:;, I!f'rr N. j.::?~~_e:~ (~/0-
...
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
anuary 5, 1993
r. Alfred Colquitt Shackelford, III
oute 2, Box 616
eswick, Virginia 22947
E: Official Determination of Number of Parcels - Section 10.3.1
Tax Map 48, Parcel 19
ear Mr. Shackelford,
he County Attorney and I have reviewed the chain of title you
ave submitted for the above-noted property. It is the County
ttorney's advisory opinion and my official determination that
his property consists of 2 separate parcels:
1) the portion west of Route 600, zoned VR, Village-
Residential; and
2) the portion east of Route 600, zoned RA, Rural Areas
evelopment rights are not required to subdivide the portion
oned VR. The portion zoned RA is one parcel entitled to five
evelopment rights. Please be advised that a development right
's required for each dwelling on this parcel regardless of
hether the property has been subdivided.
his determination considered the intent of previous owner Mrs.
ary Ashley Shackelford in will Book 41, page 492, who conveyed
he property to her brother Mr. Alfred Colquitt Shackelford.
rs. Shackelford gave the following as the reason for this
onveyance: "my reason for leaving all my property to my said
rother, A. C. Shackelford is because I desire my home Dovedale,
o be held intact".
his determination is also based on the language found in the
escriptive clauses of the last deed recorded before the current
oning Ordinance was adopted in December, 1980. Deed Book 601,
age 354, describes the property as one tract: "that certain
ract of land situated in Albemarle County, Virginia, near Stony
.I
anuary 5, 1993
arcel Determination
age 2
oint, known as 'Dovedale,' containing 381 acres, more or less".
his reasoning is based on the findings of the Virginia Supreme
ourt in the case Faison v. Union Camp 224 VA 54.
ad Route 600 not divided this property, it would have remained
ne parcel. However, the Circuit Court of Albemarle County has
uled, in Sanford v. Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals,
hat fee simple rights-of-way serve to divide property into
eparate parcels. Therefore, I have ruled that this tract is two
arcels instead of one.
nyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal
ithin thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have
ny questions, please feel free to contact me at your
onvenience.
incerely,
()kJ ~n: A 11 ~ ~
~~ MccuiiJy
oning Administrator
P/bt
Jan Sprinkle
Gay Carver
Estelle Neher, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
Reading Files
OTE: 1 additional parcel
1 by Tax Map, 2 by determination (no increase in
development rights)
D~~.7;:.~,...~ ,'~ "'-". ',;.. ".~//1~L.::~3
'J.L: ~ 9: ij~"'"' .
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA ITLE:
status eport-Scottsville Boundary Line
Adjustm nt
AGENDA DATE:
February 3, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
9 3/ ();,,,~03 (5;/~ )
STAFF C
Messrs.
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
a New
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION: ---L-
ATTACHMENTS: ~
REVIEWED BY:
ROUND:
ounty and Town of scottsville have formed a transition team to begin the process of
ifying all the issues and actions necessary to implement the boundary line change.
ollowing is a summary of these planning efforts.
· Effective Date - For reasons cited below the planning efforts are
working toward completing all actions to support a January 1,
1994 effective date.
· Boundarv Survev - A selection committee of County staff and Town
representatives have completed their interviews. We expect a
contractor (with a binding fee) will be selected by February S.
Award of a contract will be dependent on the Town Council's and
Board's appropriation of funding. A proposal for the Board's
consideration will be scheduled for the February 10 or 17
meeting. The contract will be administered by the County
(Director of Engineering) and will take 60-90 days to complete.
· Joint Aqreement - The County Attorney is preparing a joint
agreement for ultimate filing with the Court.
· Ordinances - The transition team's objective is to have all
necessary changes to Town ordinances in place prior to the
effective date of the boundary line change. The Town will be
prepared to assume all administrative responsibilities of the new
area at that time. This will avoid any overlap of dual
ordinances and the need for County staff to function as
administrative staff to the Town than if an earlier effective
date preceded updating of Town ordinances. The Town is
investigating the use of services from the Thomas Jefferson
Planning District Commission in this updating effort. Specific
areas identified to date are the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning
Ordinance (text and map), Subdivision Ordinance, Runoff Control
Ordinance, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, Road Naming
and Addressing Ordinance, Inoperative Vehicles and Illegal
Dumping Ordinances.
· Taxes - The County will continue to collect real and personal
property taxes as the Town will discontinue these. Utility taxes
for the new area will transfer at the effective date. Vehicle
decals will shift to the Town January 1, 1994. Business license
renewal dates are different and still under review. (May 1 for
c
Stat\s Report-scottsville Boundary Line Adjustment
Febn ary 3, 1993
Page 2 of 2
the County and August 1 for the Town).
determined by school census.
Sales taxes are
· Bui1dina and Fire Prevention Inspection Services - The Town has
requested the County to provide these services to the Town as
soon as feasible. County staff is developing a proposal to meet
this request.
· Other Issues - The following are additional issues requiring
transition planning: Road name sign maintenance, street lights
and historical files.
RECO)IMENDATION:
None, provided as an overview of the transition planning effort.
/bt
93.014
.
j- 29-4'';).,
Distributed to Board: S ..:...:1-
Q 2 er:;rrg - ~
'~gend~ Itro.m No. B' 0 .:ts:lottlf/ 7 lbemarle
, luvanna
Louisa
Nelson
i
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
THOMAS JEFFERSON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
401 Mcintire Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22901
(804) 977-8236
Chairman, Board of sup~rvisori .
Stephen M. Murray, Cha~rman 1f~1tt.1K..
Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation
District Quarterly Report
January 14, 1993
closed you will find the Quarterly Report of activities of
e Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District
ring the months of October, November and December, 19924
el free to contact the District office if you have
estions or comments regarding our services.
r Board meetings are held at 9:30 a.m on the 4th Wednesday
each month in the Albemarle County Office Building, Room
The meetings are open to the public and we would
lcome your input.
c County Administrators and Executives
....
~.1 1000 recycled paper
,~
THOMAS JEFFERSON SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
QUARTERLY REPORT: OCT - NOV - DEC 1992
============================================= ========= ======= =======
---------------------------------------------
Erosion end Sediment Control Plans Reviewed
( ncludes Revisions)
---------------------------------------------
Assists to developers, engineers,
professional plan designers, etc.
---------------------------------------------
Bond est~mates determined
---------------------------------------------
Site Plar Reviews
,---------------------------------------------
lAssists to agricultural landowners
1---------------------------------------------
IBest Manegement Practices installed:
1---------------------------------------------
Cons Crop System (Acres)
---------------------------------------------
Cons Till System (Acres)
---------------------------------------------
Cover & Green Man Crop (Acres)
Critical Area Planting (Acres)
---------------------------------------------
Fencing (Feet)
Past/Hay Mgmt (Acres)
---------------------------------------------
1 Past/Hay Planting (Acres)
---------------------------------------------
Strip Cropping (Acres)
---------------------------------------------
Tree Planting (Acres)
---------------------------------------------
Livestock Watering Facility (No.)
---------------------------------------------
Farm Bil Conservation Plans Completed (Acres)
---------------------------------------------
Farm Bil Conservation Plans Revised (Acres)
---------------------------------------------
Water Resources Protection Areas Program:
----------------------------------~----------
Cons Plans Completed (Tracts)
Cons Plans Revised (Tracts)
---------------------------------------------
ALB
N/A
o
N/A
15
19
10.0
o
o
o
o
,
,
1
1
-------1-------
N/A I
NEL
FLU
6
o
3
o
N/A
9
N/A
21
4
o
20
o
20
o
o
2.5
o
o
o
168 f 42.2
---______1______-
1
010
---______1______-
,
10.0 0
o
-------1
-------,
LOU :
-______1
1
1
1
1
1
-______1
I
,
22
4
14
N/A
15
37 .
r9
o
o
o
-______1______-
4
o
4 ' 1
o 0
o
1 1
o
145.3 0
o
65.9 I 691.9
o
N/A
N/A
o N/A
N/A
10 N/A
Farm Visits (No.) 4
---------------------------------------______1______--_
N/A
N/A
N/A
o
3
o
17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Nutrient Mgmt Plans Approved 1 1 0 0
--------------------------------------------- --------- ------- ------- -------
Straw Mu cher Rentals 6 0 2 0
--------------------------------------------- --------- ------- ------- -------
State Cost-Share funds distributed
---------------------------------------------
Educatioral Programs conducted
---------------------------------------------
Newsletters distributed
---------------------------------------------
Miscellareous
=============================================
Technical Staff Hours' 1
---------------------------------------------
District
---------------------------------------------
Soil Conservation Service
---------------------------------------------
Clerical Staff Hours
---------------------------------------------
.Volunteer Hours
:=======================~=====================
$555 0 $1451 $2887
-----;-1;2 ---~-2-,---~-2- ---~2--
720
*
---------
---------
218.75
WRPA:116
520
81
8
---------
---------
3
-------l-------
390 1 277
-______1______-
i
I
I
-----_-1______-
-------,-------
313
*
4
-------
-------
102.25 59.25, 164.25
364 338
67 81
o
,
1
-------1---___-
-------.-------
o
858
-------,
I
1
1
-______1
1
1
1
_______ 1
-------,
94
o
Waltor Middle School, 7th grade, Green Alliance for Environmental Action (Tandem Center
2 or the Environment)
Poste /Poetry Contest
3 Beave Creek Watershed Structure inspection.
4
Ten P.L.-566 Watershed Structure inspections, maintenance on eight structures.
.. ;-29-9]
'~,~n~~'::H:-.:.'9:2~E:;;~{~ IV)
J 22, 1993
vid P. Bowerman, Chair
bemarle County Board of Supervisors
1 McIntire Road
arlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Jefferson Area Board for Aging (JABA) Advisory council
I was appointed to the Advisory Council in June 1990. Since that
t me, I try to make brief semi-annual summaries of activities in
a effort to keep the Board of Supervisors informed of issues.
e Advisory Council is mandated by the Older Americans Act.
consists of individuals who are active as advocates for the
derly in various community organizations. The Council meets
e third Tuesday of each month, usually in the County Office
ilding. We try to conduct Public Forums at least once a year
a meal site located in each of the 6 localities which make up
BA. Additionally, most members act as individual advisors to
BA staff in various capacities.
ree major issues in process since June 1992 include:
Joint JABA Board, Advisory Councils, Trustees, and Staff
treat. A retreat was held November 23 from 1pm to 5pm at the
ppa Sigma Auditorium on 250 West. The Retreat Objectives were:
* To understand JABA's funding needs and staff's perception
of their order of priority, and
* To begin to examine the feasibility of a Capital Campaign
for a consolidated facility for all JABA programs and
our Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center. The five
year lease will expire soon.
2 Formation of a Transportation Committee. Access to suitable
t ansportation is perceived to be a major problem for the elderly
a d handicapped. The committee will study the:
* Change in demographics,
* What happens as people age,
* Need to plan for future, and
* Improving seniors access to public transportation.
3 The Council finished its series of Public Hearings with our
v sit to the Carysbrook Senior Center in Fluvanna. The hearings
a low us to personally visit with participants of JABA's services
a d discuss issues. JABA is committed to these visits and senior
s aff members participate. We have all received a new awareness
o the problems the elderly and handicapped face with poverty,
haIth, accessibility, and lack of transportation.
J~fferson Area Board for Aging Advisory Council Report
P~ge 2
E~closed are copies of the statements of Needs for the Jefferson
A~ea Board for Aging and the Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare
C~nter. These statements provide a vision of where JABA is
h~aded and how it will get there.
P ease contact me if you would like additional information about
t~e Goals and activities of JABA.
S ncerely,
r7J n / ff:1D /'
L.--lfc:et/~'-'llNc~ L/
Rpbert J. Walters, Jr.
1p45 Ravens Place
C~arlottesville, VA 22901-7527
Cppy: Gordon Walker, Executive Director
Leicester Handsfield, Chair Advisory Council
e
statement of Need
for the
THOMAS JEFFERSON ADULT HEALTHCARE CENTER
of the
Jefferson Area Board for Aging, Inc.
e
December, 1992
e
.#
e
Jefferson Area Board for Aging, Inc.'s
THOMAS JEFFERSON ADULT HEALTHCARE CENTER
Mission
The mission of TJAHC is to enhance the quality of life for impaired
ts and their families - by providing licensed daytime and emergency
th care in a protective, homelike, group setting. We help older and
bled people to remain living at home for as long as possible. We
their families to balance the demands of intense caregiving with
r family and employment responsibilities.
Historv
The Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center opened its doors in
summer of 1986, to become the only program of its kind in
lottesville and the five surrounding counties. In its first year,
his new concept for family assistance became known, TJAHC served an
age of 15 - 20 clients per day. Since then, daily attendance at the
er has grown to an average of 30 persons, with an average of 10 on
waiting list per month.
Originally located near downtown Charlottesville on Dale Avenue in
a r novated warehouse, the Center outgrew that location in 1989. It
the moved to 1512 East Market Street, where a local developer built a
fac'lity for JABA to rent under a five year lease.
e
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
-
o
o
o
o
o
The Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center has, in a very few
s, established an outstanding reputation with local health
essionals, state and local officials, and the families we've served.
has served as a model program in other parts of Virginia;
tionally, it has been a geriatric training site for medical and
ing students of the University of Virginia. It has also been
rsed on national television by "Today" show weatherman, Willard
t; in 1987, it was named a model program by the National Association
unior Leagues.
TJAHC Services
rsonalized healthcare assessments by a registered nurse
oup and individual activities to enhance abilities
ality orientation
ood pressure tests, physical therapy, physician consultation
tritional lunches and snacks
mily and individual counseling
ergency drop-off care
nnection with other supportive JABA and community services as
eded
Tvpes of Client Conditions
roke
pression
abetes
rkinson's Disease
art Attack
o Seizure Disorder
o Alzheimer's Disease
o Head Injuries
o Dementia
o Frailty, and others
A New Facilitv Is Needed!
By the year 2000, the number of Virginians over the age of 65 wili
grow faster than in most other parts of the country...And, the 75+ group
will increase by 50%.
For the past six years, the TJAHC has provided the only supportive
service of its kind locally. But, with its success, has come a
tremendous increase in client requests. Only settled into its expanded
East Market street location for 3.5 years, the Center has already
outgrown its ability to care for all who want, and urgently need, to
attend.
But, beyond the need for additional space to serve at least another
30 impaired persons per day, separate activities rooms are a190 needed.
This is because our ~lients have a such broad range of abilities and
disabilities. We can .work with them best by offering specially designed
activities and services separate Iv during part of the day.
A high demand has also evolved for housing the administrative
offices of our In-Home Care Program within the Center. This is a
critical immediate means for families to access the most appropriate
care for their loved one during a long or short period of disability.
In other words, at some points care at home may be the best answer -
while at others, group care at the Center would be best.
Additionally, families increasingly express
occasional overnight, weekend, or evening care to
chance for crucial restorative or social time away
loved ones.
a strong need for
allow caregivers a
from their impaired
To meet these various demands, TJAHC needs approximately one acre
of land - with an existing, renovate-able building - or one that would
be appropriate for a new building of 8,000 square feet. Location near
major roadways is crucial for the TJAHC to best serve busy, working
families, who are often coping with childcare and eldercare
responsibilities at the same time.
Additionally, owning our own building will save expensive costs to
put towards much needed scholarships for families who cannot afford to
pay on their own.
The Solution
Approximately $1,000,000 (or $600,000) is needed to purchase land
(unless donated) and to renovate or build a new facility. To address
this need, the Jefferson Area Board for Aging will need the substantial
support of the Thomas Jefferson area, via a Capital Campaign to raise
money for this and other critical JABA needs.
.
e
A STATEMENT OF NEEDS
FOR THE
JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING
To Provide the Best Services in the Best Location _
To Families of All Economic Levels
e
e
JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING
Mission
JABA's mission is to enhance the quality of life for
adults and their families by providing, in the most cost
effective way, a full array of life-sustaining services.
helps older and disabled adults to remain living at home
long as possible; it helps their families to balance the
demands of caregiving with other family, employment, and
responsibilities.
older
It
for as
intense
civic
Historv
The Jefferson Area Board for Aging was created by local
governments in 1975. Every year since then, JABA has been
appointed by the United States Congress (through the Older
American's Act) to be the official headquarters of aging services
and information in Charlottesville and the counties of Albemarle,
Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa and Nelson.
During its seventeen years of service, JABA has provided
hundreds of thousands of hours of supportive care and well over a
million meals to the frail and at-risk elderly. It has grown
from offering a Meals Program and a Senior I.D. Discount Program
- to its current offering of 22 services, that address nearly
every aspect of daily living for older adults.
By constantly improving and expanding services, JABA has
kept pace with the many advancements in caring for the elderly -
and has earned an outstanding reputation with its clients and
with health professionals and officials throughout the State of
Virginia. It has grown, dramatically, from its initial staff of
five in 1975, to its present, highly skilled staff of 27 full
time employees, 101 part time employees, and over 350 dedicated
volunteers.
Achievements
In 1986, JABA won President Reagan's "Project Independence
Award" for its first-in-the-State, accident-preventing liQm&
Safetv Program. In 1987, its one-year-old Thomas Jefferson Adult
Healthcare Center was named a Model Program by the National
Association of Junior Leagues. And, in 1991, the agency was
identified as a "Point of Light" by President Bush for its Peer
Counseling Program.
Among its many services innovations, JABA was the first-in-
the-State to provide donated fans and air-conditioners to the
frail, needy elderly (through its Cool Aid Program) and to help
the moderate and low-income elderly to save money on medical
costs (through its Voluntarv Medicare Assignment Program).
. .
.
e
Needs
e
While JABA has grown remarkably since 1975, it has much to
o prepare for the stunning, impending growth in the older
lation. Today, there are more than 25,000 local elderly -
3500 of whom live in poverty.
the year 2000, the number of Virginians over the age of
grow faster than in most other parts of the United
Locally, those numbers will grow at a rate higher than
v r A, and the most-at-risk group of elderly (75 and
w'l i bI 00/-. By 2020, more than a whopping 20%
population will be 65 years of age or older.
The greater Charlottesville area is also fast becoming a
irement mecca" for many seniors. They are attracted by the
nt creation of four major retirement communities, the beauty
he Blue Ridge foothills, the University of Virginia, and
1 healthcare facilities.
Keenly aware of these important facts, the JABA staff and
d of Directors have, in the past year, discussed in depth the
cy's current operations and future needs. A Three Year Plan
service delivery, refinement, and expansion has been
loped - and key administrative changes have taken place.
Through the process of examining the health of the agency, a
er of critical needs have been revealed...Needs, which the
f feels must be addressed aggressively, to assure that JABA
respond to the complex demands of the next decade - and
nd.
JABA Facilities
The highest priority among JABA's management staff, for the
successful provision is the
VA
include JABA's outlying county offices and rural Senior
This facility would have ample room for:
(1) An expanded Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center
(2) Immediate and future expansion of JABA's central
programs and staff
(3) Inclusion of JABA's In-Home Care Program
(4) Inclusion of JABA's Charlottesville Senior Lunch Program
(5) Regular meetings of JABA's Staff, Board of Directors and
other volunteer leadership groups
e
(6) JABA's fast-growing corp of volunteer workers
(See Attachment 1 for details on the need for the above changes.)
It is the belief of staff that consolidating JABA's
scattered programs and offices into one, highly visible facility
is crucial for meeting future demands - and will do much for the
elderly and the co~nunity at-large. Here's how...
It will offer convenient "one-stop-shopping" for addressing
various eldercare needs. It will create a strong, enduring image
of JABA's role in the con~unity. It will save considerable monev
on rental space and disjointed service provision that can be used
to help the needy on JABA's waiting lists. And, it will increase
donor support to JABA on an annual basis.
Endowm.e.n.:t
Staff's second highest priority, for addressing future
demands and to assure long-term financial security for the
agency, is to substantially increase the Endo~nent Fund (now
totaling just $30,000). Gifts to this fund will be invested for
growth - and only the interest income will be spent: (1) to
create new services as needed, (2) to supplement our funding of
critical annual services, and (3) to deal with special,
unexpected agency needs.
ReclUi:in~ Dp.bt,
JABA currently carries substantial debt ($590,000) on the
Heede Building. It i8 the reconwendation of staff that JABA not
incur any further debt. Hence, funds raised through a Capital
Campaign for a consolidated building should pay for all building
and equipment costs. Staff further reco~~ends that careful
attention be given to the issue of retiring our existing debt.
Solution
As it looks to the future, JABA has the options of
continuing with its current facilities and levels of service - or
of staging a special major campaign.
To address the needs outlined above, the staff and Executive
Co~~ittee of the Board of Directors recommend careful
conBinp.ration of the following...
(1) That a Capital Campaign for $2,500,000 be carefully
planned and staged, as soon as'po5Bible, to enable JABA to
obtain land and build a long term, consolidated facility.
(2) That JABA's Endo~illent Fund be publicized irr~ediately
and that a Planned Giving Program be established and kept in
a state of readiness to attract major gifts to it.
...
.
e
e
e
. ,
Attachment 1
At present, JABA has outgrown its central offices and has
inaUeguate space for staff and volunteers. Meetings of its full-
tim~ staff, its full Board of Directors and other volunteer
lea~ership groups must all be staged in borrowed or rented space
awaT from the central office.
Its In-Home Care Program is housed temporarily across Rt. 28
in ~ small basement space at Branchlands (in exchange for
ser 1Tices to Branchland' s residents).
Its Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center is also located
sep rately - in a costly, rented building on the east end of
Cha~lottesville area. It has outgrown this space, as well, and
nee<as additional rooms for overnight respite care and for
sep rate activities, tailored to its clients differing levels of
imp, irment.
JABA's Charlottesville Senior Lunch Program is located, in
yet another part of town, at the Carver Recreation Center. That
loci tion is seen as an unappealing location by both its current
par icipants and many others, who do not attend as a result.
i\ t ~b l ~, Ll~~ rI' ,'-29-73
ulS n tueu !,Q DUdfu. ,_,_,..~,_.....,..;.."
Agenda Item No. 9~~g.!-o~_(S,.,zo)
c '
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
.
.
Richard Huff, Deputy County Executive
of Finance~
Robert J. Walters, Jr., Deputy Director
January 28, 1993
: Monthly Financial Report
tached is the December Financial Report for the General and
hool Funds.
e Fund Balance Report has been added to the monthly report
nce the Independent Auditor's Report for the 1991/92 fiscal
ar has been completed and final balances are available.
e report indicates that the School Fund has a deficit of
15,858). Adjustments are in process which will eliminate the
ficit. Additionally, the School Fund Budget for December 1992
slightly less than November. This is due to the appropriation
ansfer for personnel currently classified as Information
rvices, Local Government, who were formerly classified as
ucation.
P ease contact me if you have any questions.
C py: Melvin A. Breeden
, .
~
z
w
o
a:
w
a..
******'it
. 1t)C') 00.""
OO)COO)OOIt)
uiuicxiuiciuicD
(QC'). C\l1t)
****
C').C')....
CO 0)0) It)
cxicicxi~
. ..
................................................................... .......-................................
......~.~......... .8 .$cg.~O).II.I:II_
Iii illilli.111 i!llllliiill I
:5:.<..)
rrff:r?~ rrruurrrrrrU/\f)ffu::r::U:U:f::fJ:tmrrrtrrrtrrttrr::/:::::::}:::::::::}:::::;::::;:::::.::
~:~:r::~::~:::{{: :t:>><f::r:::::::::~:?>::::::::::::::::::::::::::?::<:::::::::::::<:::::::::t::::{t:::::::::~:;::::::::::::::;::::::::::.;:.:.:-..... "," . .
~...~~.~.................<:::);;iif~c;C;I~.. ...~ 0 0 0 0
.......0),......~1t) ............
It)CO(Q 0
W g~~.;
CJ .......... 0
z ... - eN
< - ~
]:
o
(/)
z ~
o a:
t= 0
< a..
a: w
W a:
a.. ....I
o :!
~ 0
z z
:) <
8 ~
W ~
....I :t
a: ~
< Z
~ 0
~ :Ii
....I
<
>>.....
()Q
11.&.1
.s"'o!
NO
~8
ii
***
C')1t)....
"':~"':
C\IC\IC\I
...
.........................
!"I~ll~.
............1tt...t" ...~
.~.....'.'O')'.'.(i.I .........
wi. .)....
Iii I
lil
I
>1
Ot
)a
..........-.;,
,...
It)
co
.;
,...
co
.,.
-
(/)
W
:)
Z
W
>
W
a:
C/)
o
0' z
Z ::>(1)
::> u.w
u. _ (!J :)
...JC/) zz
~5 z~~
wo -<w
Z :t ClH- a:
wo a:C/)
(!J C/) ...J W ::> ....1<
__ <u.C/)
...J...JWa:C/)I~
<<t-wzu.O
oO<O<...J~
00"'" wa: w
...J...JC/)u......C/)
C/)
Z .....
o Z
i= W
< ::iE
a: Z
w a:
Q.. w
o >
..... 0
Z...J (!J
w< ...J
::iE..... <
zz a:
a:w w
W::iE ffi
~~ C)
C)<C/)...J
...JQ..a:<
<ww.....
a:ou.o
wlC/).....
ZZZID
wo<:)
C)Z~C/)
~nm~r CO.OC\l ~!I ,... 0
.....................OC') ..........(0) C')O. C') .,.
CO It) 0 co co 0)0 ........It) It). 0) . ~
O')~ ",:o;lli""':":COan 00;C'iC'i C\lCO.... It)
enw C\lOC')(QO)C')co C')......ClOO) C')C')...... co
N'c) (Q.C')......O)....eN 0) It) It) 0 0........ C\I
0; ... ~ ... ...: It) . "':C'ictiC'li 1li"1t)0
eno It) C\I ... C\I C\I......C') It) (Q N
t~ ...... en ... ... ... en
.,. .,.
(I)
w
C/)
z
w
a..
><
w
Z
C/) 0
ZC/)Ci5
Qo:;
.....z-
<::>0
a:u....J
wC)o
Q..zO
O-:t
o~o
z<C/)
::>t-...J
u.C/)<C
...J::>t-
0(/,)0
Olt-
.....u.1D
........J::>
Ow(/,)
C/)C/)
'it
0)
en
N
..
.
0')
...
an
co
,...
eN
...
.,.
It)
o
co.
o
,...
co
.,.
"0
...
as
0
ID
(5
0
.c
u
C/)
CII
.c
-
>-
,Q
"0
CII
N
..:::
0
.t:.
-
::::II
as
J!J
c:
::::II
0 ....
u
u
as
c:
.i
1::
CII
u
-
0
~
u
as
,Q
"0
(5
.t:.
*
It)
....
as
-
u
CII
q::
CII
...
II)
CII
...
::::II
:!::
"0
c:
CII
Q.
X
CII
c:
.2
-
as
u
::::II
"0
W
"0
CII
-
U
CII
.-
0
...
Q..
...
It)
o
~
o
,...
co
..
(/)
w
en
z
w
Q.
><
W
....I
<
~
o
~
en
W
en
z
W
a..
><
W
a:
w
>
o
W
:)
Z
W
>
W
a:
LL
o
W
o
z
5
<
Ie
, '
Q
Z
::) l-
Ll. a:
-oJ 0
< Q.
a: w
w a: C\I
z -oJ 0)
W ~ 0)
(!J 'P"
~ (,) a:
z w
z < m
::) z :E
0 u: w
0 ~ (,)
w W
...I :I: Q
a: I-
< Z
:E 0
w :E
a:l
...I
<
I-
Z
W
(,)
a:
w
Q.
*' *' *' *'1 *'
''It C\l0) 0(.'1)
0(.'1)(.'1)00)
ariOcCON
COII)(.'I) CO
.................................................
'ml:$~1
uW u .,~.,..,..,..,..,..,~.,..,~..,~.,..,~.., .,....,....,..,..,..,..,..,..,..,....~.'...,....,....,........~. .....,.....,..,..,.::.~. .........,..,.....,...,......r>,...~.~.......,..,.
.,..~./...,.,.,.,C.........u,... ',.,..,.., """"""",.},..,'>,>"~"'O"'_""""",>"I
-C~' ::::::::::::::;:::::;::::::::::::::-::::..::;:;::-:-!'i!.::::::-:::-::;:::::;:;:;:::;';::-:-'fi!
::'}}}}}}"""'(Q,'N:::::}}}}i'
..1....1. ....,...................................~..~I............................~
o 0 0 010
.........iItl...
w
CI
Z
<
:I:
(,)
*'*'*' *'*'*'*'*'*' *'*'
C\I....(.'I)O)O)....ClOII)"lt(.'l)ClO
''It(.'l)ClO....OCOClOII)O)O)II)
NaiOOO"':~cOOcON
1I)"lt1l)1I)1I)"lt(.'l)"lt ''It''lt
i1il ii Ii lililillllJli.lllilfii II
"::}}:'}::}:":'::,..:.::,:},:,}}::}}""""'.*:::'""''':::''':::'''''''':,>'' ''',W::'.::::,}}:,::'''''''' :';;;:',
>,,,,>>,,,,,,,~,,,,,~,,,,,~,.,,,~,,,~,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,>,",N>>"",>""O')"""""""",('I,I"JD",,,,,,,,,~,,,,,,,,,~,~,~,,,~,,,,,,,,,,,,O')~,,,,,,~
I~~~.;
........................................................................................................
.................... .........................................-........................................
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010
...........................iItl...
<0
ftLu.
~g
>''',', "'/!!!"
It)
:"""",.,0::,
{{D.;;
0')1-
O)w
N-CI
O)Q
t~
........OICO
....C\l0....1I)
ClOClO....O)C\I
;o;o;ot\i
C\lO)CO(.'l)C\I
CO 0)........0)
o;twi........
11)'" CO
... ...
w
:)
z
w
>
w
a:
ZW
-=>
enZ
a:W
..JW>
<u.W
..Jwa:ena:
<C.....wz..J
O<co<c<C
ot-wa:.....o
..Jenu......
.....
(.'I)....O)II)ClO"lt(.'l)O)"lt;CO
OClO.... 0.... co............o II)
0) 00) (.'I)ClOCOClOII) ''It....C\I
t\io;.o;twia:icDtwio;(.'I)t\i
''It....II)O)(.'I)C\lCOII)....ClOC\I
ClOC\lCO....OClOII)....II)II)O)
twi;cD;.t\it\i;twico.
...............(.'1)......... CO
... ...
(I)
w
(I)
z
W
0..
X
W
Z
o
i= w
<C a:..... (I)
~z =>z w
eno ~w en
zi= ..... =>:E ffi
-<C Z 00.. 0..
:Ea: w z-O..J X
0..... :E o..J<C w
<Cen 0.. _w..... CI
!:-Z>enO !;;(Gjffi Z
~~I-~[j WO:E i=
G~~~~~5~~~~
c;!..Jen~oi=~z~w~
a::$ooz<c-=>wl1.o
WQ::i::i<Co~:Eo~..J
Zomm:E=>a::EZ<c<C
w=>=>=>=>o<coOa:1-
C)..,D.D.:I:WD.Oz.....O
.....
CO
C\I
~
0)
Q
"!.
0')
'P"
..
Q
..
C\I
(I)
w
(/)
z
W
Q.
X
W
a:
w
>
o
w
::)
z
w
>
w
a:
LI.
o
W
o
z
:5
<
a:l
Q
Z
::) ....
LL a:
.oJ 0
0 D..
0 W
::J: a: N
(,) ...J ~
0 :5 ~
~ (,) ...
z a:
z < w
::) ~ rD
0 2
(,) LL W
W ~ (,)
W
.oJ ::J: Q
a: ....
-< z
2 0
w 2
rD
.oJ
<
..~............~
!li<
wg
..~....~.
....
Z
W
(,)
a:
w
D..
"#."#."#."#."#.
1t)C') cncn "
~~~~q
1t)00.0C')
C').I..
'tl."#.'tl.'tl.'tl."if!."if!.
...CO.NIt)"C')
qf'oo:"!q",,,:~f'oo:
OC')It)OC')ON
.CO.It)N".
...
................... .......................................................
1!!llt(~(iilifli
:~:~:~:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::...:::.:::...::::::::::::~:::::~:~:::::::::~::
I.....=:
11.1
.~...~...~. .~... ..~.........................S~;;o;;OC;I~
....C')It)C')**l1t)
..." co
maim(l) ~
1t)00.N "
cn*....* 00
*-* *
- -
):..'
Ii
~Q
.:}:....:..a::
....Q,;;
(W)....
~w
NCJ
~Q
t~
.il~al
.......................:....."....It):o.co..co;;.
...to'CiN'co:t9'.
..~"""'...........lt) ..i..'N........'......
.................... ., ...... --.-..--......
u........t................ ...~i~~U
......:.....:.....:}}}}}ijlJ<,::~:.~::~',..'.:':'........
.il.al
w
CJ
Z
<
:r:
o
00. cn" 00
"N"It)C')
It) N.... It) It)
m&ON&ON
oC')cncnC')
.(')It)COO
*0*(1)&0
N (')It)
* **
w
::)
z
w
>
w
a:
en
..J
o ZW
o _::)
J: (l)Z
o a:W
en -JW>
I <LLW
..JW a: en a:
<....wz..J
0<0<1-<
Ol-wa:o
..J(I)LLI-
I-
O.It)....Ojao
.".(')0.(')
.........ao.1t)It)
&ON(I)"":N"N
oao"cnaocn(')
NCOao.*COO
N"":~&O &0
.*** It)
* *
o
w
o
z
W
D..
><
W
Z
J: 0
~ W~
< 0<
W(I)z!::2
J:W<~
.0 Z 0
W-Ci:o
O>I-:::::E
Za:Z_ en
<W-Z W
0(1)<0 (I)
ZZ:::::E- Z
WOZI- W
1--00 0..
1-1- ::) X
<<~a:
.1-<1- W
Za:a:en (!J
OOWZ Z
Z~Q..Q..O I-
O<~OOen<
~~<en(l)a:ffi
O(l)a:Y:!~WQ..
::)Zl-t:t:~O
a:_..J..J-JZ..J
t):::::Ea:OO<<
~~~~~~b
I-
"
...
ct
o
"
.
tit
It)
o
~
o
"
CO
..
"
~
CIS
0
rD
"0
0
.z:
u
en
CI)
.z:
-
:>.
.c
"
CI)
N
.t: C')
0
.z:
-
::::lI
CIS
U)
-
C
::::lI
0
U
U
CIS
c
"tiS
1:
CI)
u
-
0
~
u
CIS
.c
"
"0
.z:
"if!.
It)
....
CIS
-
U
CI)
ll=
CI)
~
U)
Gl
~
::::lI
:t:
"
C
Gl
Q.
)(
CI)
"
Gl
-
U
Gl
.e-
0..
...
o
w
o
z
W
D..
X
W
a:
w
>
o
w
::)
z
w
>
w
a:
LL
o
W
(,)
z
:5
<
rD
~ '. .
en
z
o
~ ~
W 0 C\I
a.. a.. 0)
o ~ ~
~ W 0:
Z 0 W
::> z ~
o ~ W
0<(0
W m W
...J 0 0
0: Z
<( ::>
~ u.
W
m
...J
<(
...J
~O
-z
0..::>
<(u.
o
...J
00
OZ
I::>
ou.
en
...J
~o
wZ
z::>
wu.
~
0)
~
N
~
-
.....
~
0)
0)
.....
(b
0)
~
CD
('I)
.....
CD-
CD
C\I
6
.....
~
C\I
0)
I
o
('I)
I
CD
o
w
o
z
~
~
o
z
::>
u.
o
w
....
o
0:
....
en
w
0:
z
::>
~~
0......
~CD-
lO.....
CD CD
~~
--
-
o
o
o
CD-
~
-
8'
o
~
C\I
~
-
r:::-
lO
o
~-
......
~
-
@"-giO;=-SS
..... .....0)00
C\lO('l)CDOO
~-g-~-~~~
C\I lO ('I) ---
~~~
---
en
....
z
w
~
....
en
::>
""')
o
<(
en
en
w
...J
en
w....
o Zw en
Z
c(~ ~w
<l~o: <(5:
mO~ ww
00.. Ien
z~~~....w~
::>...J~::>u.o:o
u.<( wO~::>
en oc8en...Jent;
ZWo..l::>OW>
O....<(en~zen~
....wo~>:::>::>=:J
<(~o<(a:oz....
o:ol--~WOO::>
o..::>O:~>l--m
omwoOzo:I
o:~u.o:~ow~
o.._eno.._~Io
~a;~wOOOz
UJ>~o:<cwLnO)
O:I.1..I--u.>o..l--C\I
iO
fe
L6
......
C\I
<b
CD
<<f
C\I
~
.....
~
-
-
[0
o
g
0)
~
5'
lO
CD
to
.....
~
-
5'
.....
v
CD-
C\I
.....
.....
~
t
V
I
o
~
0)-
lO
.....
0)
~
en
I--
Z
w
~
I--
en
::>
""')
o
<(
~
o
....
W
o
z
~
<(
m
o
z
::>
u.
o
W
I--
o
0:
I--
en
W
0:
Z
::>
o
w
I--
en
::>
""')
o
<(
\'~~.
~.~,~C~~
4:'';~> ~:
r ~\~
~. 1 1".,;"- r.
... ....;) _ 1;
I,. ":'... <^'- ~.
"1:l:<,,~;'~~~;{i'
~., -,,~~
" ':'"........LT'l~~J
" ~ .......
:o8c.iro: j - c19-'i ~
Agendlltem No. _ 9~1 ""~o~ (S'~/)
r
:COMMONWE'ALTH of VIRGINIA
-CJO'1 C Miller, Irector
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond. Virginia 23219
TOO (804) 786-1934
Telephone (804) 786-3143
FAX (804) 225-4261
M. oseph Conte
Mi ie Tavern
Ro te 21, Box 112
Ch lottesville, V A 22902
Michie Tavern, Albemarle County (DHR File No 02-93)
Mr. Conte:
For some time the Department of Historic Resources has been aware of your interest in
incl ding the above property on the Virginia Landmarks Register and nominating it to the
Na onal Register of Historic Places. Before this action is taken, I would like to clarify for you
the ature of these designations. It is the policy of our department to notify property owners,
ow ers of adjacent property, and local city or county officials prior to such consideration.
The national and state registers provide official listing of places in the Commonwealth
jud ed to have local, state or national archaeological, architectural, and/or historical
sig ificance. At its next meeting on Tuesday, February 16, 1993, the State Review Board will
hav the opportunity to consider the inclusion of Michie Tavern on the National Register.
Sho ld the boards determine the prepared nomination for this property is acceptable, they will
rec mmend the nomination to the National Register of Historic Places maintained by the
De artment of the Interior.
Listing in the National Register provides recogmtIOn and assists in preserving our
Na on's heritage. Listing of a resource recognizes its historic importance and assures protective
revi w of Federal projects that might adversely affect the character of the resource. If Michie
Tav rn is listed in the National Register, certain Federal investment tax credits for rehabilitation
and other provisions may apply.
Listing in the National Register does not mean that limitations will be placed on the
pro erties by the Federal Government. Public visitation rights are not required of owners. The
Fed ral Government will not attach restrictive covenants to the properties or seek to acquire
the .
M. oseph Conte
Re: ichie Tavern, Albemarle County
2
You are invited to attend the State Review Board meeting at which the nomination will
be onsidered. The Board will meet at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday. February 16. 1993 at the
hea uarters of the Vir inia Historical Socie 428 N. Boulevard corner of Kensin ton Avenue
and N. Boulevard Richmond Vir inia 23221. We hope that you can come. The nomination
will be considered by the Historic Resources Board at its meeting on Wednesday, February 17,
199 , at the same location. This meeting is also open to the public.
Enclosed, please find a notice that explains, in greater detail, the results of listing in the
Na onal Register and the Virginia Landmarks Register. The notice also describes the rights and
pr edures by which a property owner may comment on or object to listing in the National
Reg ster and Virginia Landmarks Register.
Should you have any questions about this nomination before the forthcoming Board
ing, please contact James Hill or Julie Vosmik at (804) 786-3143.
/} . / ../
(_ >-;. ~ '-- c( 2-
j~j/
Enc osures
cc: David P. Bowerman, Chairman, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Phil Gramm, Chairman, Albemarle County Planning Commission
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Albemarle County Planning Director
Nancy K. O'Brien, Executive Director, Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
Melinda Frierson, Albemarle County Historical Society
Geoffrey B. Henry, Consultant
<:"'~';;~~':~"'':';.' ~'7
".. ....-. ,-
}>()
()O
}> ~~
r "U}>"U
CD ..,., rc()-, ()
rT'1 AI -l 0 :-1 : 0
z - 0 )>rrJZ)>-U~
o ~Z(/)~ ;o::o~X~l=f ~
~ ~~~~(I)~()Z~~n ~
~ rT'1 .~-<o>CD~Z"U~a -l
rT'1 8 ~ ;;u (/) 00 -< -U G') ......, rTi [ZJ 0 rT1
;0 00 00......,......,(1) CD
CZCr}>rT1(1). "0
N Z:j-lO()rrJ=i....."U"t-3 c
.U1 .=< () rrJ ~ ;:g 0 rrJ }> ?O a ~ z
-' FrTl (]1 -l (/) () () () () ::e t=j ~
~ 1.0 ~ ~ [j 0 0 ;:g rrJ Z ..... ;0
<0 :::0 0 s: s: (I) r ,u -<
, NC): 0 "'U-U l>Z
· Z Z CCCD~(I): "U
j; s; ~-< s;
-l:::! -l
-0
~z
.1
" ,1
q
t""'
:2 ~o
- ~t%j
~ ~(')
5j~2
::jo,t<j
t'lt'l",_
~~~~
C-l;1~
.~E::~
....~iJlO
:a ,c.o
8 ~ ~ t,
Z:<l a
>[:J ~
1\J-l"'Z
1\J ~tz:l
~ ~2
(')
~UN-Z
. . , . 0,
o;:o)>z;;I
~::ir=o~
ZOrn"
",,;:OoiTi
;:ooc5
;:::lJZ
o~~~
Z-<;:oO
~UliTi~
""ZUl
ZOUl~
~?i6G;
g~~'1J
zlTlz,."
~)>)>~
G;d~~
z~(')~
~r~~
-~;g
gr;;fj
~o"
""";:0
?OlO
<",3:
~)>o
:;;Qr::1
8Ci~
0' R'
;:0
1)
Ul r;
~ -<
Ul
Z 0
"
::!
,." ;:0
r 'T'I
~ (')
0
;:0
~
~
-
o
:
{""
-I
X>
<
~
~
~-
~
~ (/{"
1;-, l'
'-'" -0
, ('t,C'{"
"""-",,-
H(t>
N;:o
"'-<
UlI
A
A ,0
o ..j)
~) ". \;A
S-}\~
, \;<'~
.;.. \'::\\ S
- <D '7P. <"
? '"
'. r' 0
\<"
Ul'=
ow
-< -<
>I
^fT1
,..,
ZO
::)
.,,~
;:0-
0;:0
;:::ki
Ul
o
'Z
(1)0
0'>-<
0'00
<D.
o
W 0'
0'-
0-
::;0'
- .: '"
~,
I~S;>
2.
-,-<z &.,12.;:,
~'IO '9;>"'.]',
r;Gi;;t .. .-
::'{T'l..
~n
;<:.::J
Sc
:..ll
,,)
OfTI
mol
~>
"'JZ
00
'On
",9
~':o
Ul
fT1
,n
...Z
o
1)-<
."
~o
Ul~
fTI
;0
"
S;>s.
11/.]'1;>.
, SJ. ..
"';>& .
& 0;>.
." ;>'" J&.,
v' Iv'
"'''0.
'" ., 0;> .
J&'2 a. 6.,."6.f.(
S6 1.",
'02."'2'41
.V60.
&1.]6..,
. 06 _ S'4I
'J-<
>i::
;:0
"
"""
\UW
"I~
OON
Ul(."l
- ,
r~
0'
v.,
~':
....o_~
{"
~...."
6'"
.~~\
:t
:;
(T,
Al
fT1
t-:3
a::
~..;}
,.........;}
:;:
~
z
~
ITI
;:0
ITI
l
,S&.].;:,
:20"2s.'2&.,
. 6- Iv'
~
\~
j:
,..,0
Ie:::
t;J
/
/ c..,\4
~ ~r.t~
""VI
ZITI'
"0
;:00
OC
3:;:0
VI
OITl
iDVI
~~
coo
(JI
(')
-00
:..C
!1'0l
,..,
Ul
'O~~
'0<;. \
<;~' ''I'"
t,. ,~
:~
,,,.c:.~~...s~
" '2."
't',
:>"-.
(')
~"'O
t%.1:>
CJ.)~
N
..;}
,r;;,r;;\s
,r;;,r;;,Ojr;;,' 'I
't',
'U-<
>3:
XI
"
"".....
, r;;,<; S
(Jr;;, ,,,OJ
, ,,'
f\" ,r;;,<;S
(Jr;; bl-
, l-".
f\' r;;,\
r;;,,(J ...l-~
,(J l-....
f\'
'-<.. - :;:..
0/0
,/.....-
,/ ..:>.
W -
WUl
-N
,..,
("\
("\
w.:>.
....Ul
II II
0'C1'>
\DOO
. 0
o.
-0
L.
VI
NUl /.:;
oW
o .
-Ul
~ "} 0"
'b -,fii 0
$.tt of-"
C1'>'(J.~6-~/ ~Cl
~~ / /
.....-
\. !'1
1
C>
VI
~ Ul
r-
,." C>
Z C>
C>
"
,."
~
N
C>
0
\fA TIO\TAL REGISTER CRITERIA fOR EV ALVA nON
Critenon A: Properties that are aSSOCIated with events that have made a significant contribution
to the broaa patterns of our history.
Criterion B: Properties that are associated with the lives of persons signiticant in our past.
Criterion C: Properties that embodv the distinctive characteristics of a type. period. or method
of constructIon or that represent a signiticant and distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual distinction.
Criterion D: Properties that have yielded. or may be likely to yield. information important in
prehistory or history.
Criteria Considerations (Exceptions)
Ordinarily cemeteries. birthplaces. or graves of historical figures. properties owned by religious
institutions or used for religious purposes. structures that have been moved from their original
locatIons. reconstructed historic buildings, properties primanly commemorative in nature, ~d
properties that have achieved significance WIthin the past 50 years shall not be considered elieIbl<:
for the National RegIster. However. such properties will Qualify if they are integral parts ot
districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories:
A. a religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or
artistic distinction or historical importance: or
B. a building or structure removed from its original location but which is
significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the surviving
structure most importantly associated with a historic person or event; or
C. a birt~place or grave of a historical figure of outstanding impo~ce ~f
there IS no other appropriate site or building directly associated WIth hIS
or her productive life; or
D. a cemetery which derives its primary significance from graves of persons
of transcendent importance, from distinctive design fe4tures, or from
association with historic events; or
E. a ~econstructed building when accurately executed in a sui~le
enVIronment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoranon
master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same
association has survived; or
F. a prope.rty primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or
symbolic value has invested it with its own historical significance; or
G. a property ~chieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of
excepnonal unportance.
I!
CHECKLIST FOR STATE AND NATIONAL REGISTER PROCESS IN VIRGINIA
(8 denotes completed step in the process)
Evaluation of EIUribilitv
8 PreliminarY Information Form receIved and
revIewed. additional informauon requested If
necessary
8 Pre~ Information Form reVIewed and
rated by RegIster Evaluauon Team at seIDl-monthly
meenng
o Information on properties potentially affected bv
federal undertakings reviewed and rated bv Re~ster
Evaluation Team at semi-monthly meeting -
8 Preliminary Informatlon Form matled to
members of State Review Board for revIew [Wo
weeks prior to meetin~. Board makes
recommendation of elIgibility at bi-monthlv
meeting. Sea;on 106 evaluanons are not taken
before the board.
Listin2 on the Re2isters
If applicant elects to pursue registration. applicant
consuits with Department staff regarding cntena.
areas of significance. period of significance and
boundaries.
II Department staff reviews nomination drafts upon
request and provides technical assIstance
8 Department staff reviews completed nommatlon
o Copies of nomination sent to members of both
Boards two weeks prior to meeting
CJ Owner(s), officials, and consultant notified of
Boards' decisioas
CJ Ploperty is loged in at NatiOllll Resist<< office
CJ Owner. <XlII8IJlhftt aDd local officials notified of
Keepec'. deci8icla
III Ownens) and officials noufied of receipt of.
Prelimmary Informanon Form. Department ot
Histone Resources archIves checked for property
file and any additional intormatlon
III Owner(s) and officials mtormed of team
recommendation. nonfied of pendm~ consideration
by State Review Board. Addinonal mfo~on
requested if necessary. Ln the case of histonc
districts. public informanonal meetmlZs may be heJd
at the request of the appitcant or the locality
o Officials notified of reVIew team
recommendations regarding Sea;on 106 projects
III Owner(s) and officials notified of Board's
decision
III COMPLETE nomination due to Department of
Historic Resources by first day of the month pnor
to the month of the State ReVIew Board and
Virginia Board of Histone Resources meetings at
which the nomination is to be considered
. Owner(s). adjacent p'roperty owners. consuJtant
and Jocal officials notified bv letter no less than 30
days prior to State Review Board meeting to initiate
3o-day COlllDlC2lt period
. In the case of a histone district. Department of
Historic Resources holds a public hearing within
the Jocality not Jess than thirty days pnor to the
Boud meetings and publishes legal notice .in the
local paper to initiate 3<Hiay comment penod
o Nomination presented at State Review Board
meeting. If approved. State Review Board
recomllW'!lldtl tbat nomination be forwarded to
Keeper of the National Register: nomiDatioas
~tcd to Virginia Board of ~toric. ~
If approved withOut owner obJecbon will be listed
on flie Virginia unnlllllrks Register on day of
presentation
a Nomination is forwarded to the Keeper of tho
National Regilt<< in Washington. D.C.
a FoUowiq 4' day review period, ~ is
notified of dec:iai0ll. If approVed without 0WDeI'
objection, 'property is listed on National R~~. If
owners object. Keeper declares p~ e1ipble.
SIIb8eq1at 0WDeII may resciad ObJecUoa.
I
...-l, on C '.itller = ~~tor
COMMO~T\VE.A.LT1-1 of VIRGINL.;
DepanmenJ of Historic Resources
::1 Governor Streel
Richmond. VirginIa 23219
TDO: (8041 786-19:l
Teleonone (804) 786
FAX: (804) 225-4261
RESUL 1'8 OF LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Eligibility for FederaJ tax provisions: If a property is listed in the National
Register, certain federal tax provisions may apply. The Tax Reform Aer of
1986 revises the historic preservation tax incelllives aulhorized by Congress in
the Tax Reform Act of 1976, the Revenue Aer of 1978, The Tax TrearmelU
Extension Act of 1980, the Economic Recovery Tax Aer of 1981, and the Tax
Reform Aer of 1984 and as of Janumy 1, 1987, provides for a 20 percent
invesrmenr tax credit with a full alijusrmelU to basis for rehabilitating historic,
c011lJ1U!rciai, industrial, and residential relUal buildings. The former 15 percelU
and 20 percent invesrmenr tax credits for rehabilitation of older c011lJ1U!rdal
buildings are combined in/o a single 10 percenr invesrmenr tax credit for
c011lJ1U!rciai or industrial buildings built before 1936. The Tax Treatment
Extension Act of 1980 provides federal tax deductions for charitable
contributions for conservation purposes of partial interests in historically
important land areas or structures. . Whether these provisions are advantageous
to a property owner is dependent upon the particular circumstances of the
property and the owner. Because tax aspects outlined above are complex.
individuals should consult legal counselor the appropriate local Internal
Revenue Service office for assistance in determining the taX consequences of
the above provisions. For further information on certification requirements,
please refer to 36 CPR 67.
Consideration in planning for Federal, Federally licensed, and Federally
assisted projects: Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 requires that Federal agencies allow for the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation to have an opponunity to comment on all projects affecting
historic properties listed in the National Register. For further information,
please refer to 36 CPR 800.
CoDSideration in issuing a surface coal mining permit: In accordance with
the Surface Mining and Control Act of 1977 t there must be consideration of
historic values in the decision to issue a surface coal mining permit where coal
is located. For further infOnnation, please refer to 30 CPR 700 et seq.
Qualification for Federal grants for historic preservation when funds are
aftilabJe: Funding is unavailable at present.
:
.'~:
p:.1.:':~
r;: t 'l"~
~j .~.. '
~ ~ \ i-
:\0... ._J,:;
\i~\A~~ *
..~~~
CO )Y17Y1 0 ~\1lEA~i.L Tl-I c f VIRG Il\T1.A..
1.41pr C'''-pc!or
Department of Historic Resources
~21 (j,nernnr Street
Richmond. VirgInia 23:19
-DO 3041 -R6,1034
~ ~leDnone ,50J I 786-3'':
= AX (8041 225-4261
FACTS REGARDING NATIONAL REGISTER DESIGNATION
1. National Register designation officially recognizes the cultural,
architectural, and landscape features of an historically significant property,
bringing it to the attention of the community, state, and nation.
2. National Register designation does not restrict an owner's use of his or
her property in any way as long as private, non-federal funds are used. It does
not, for example, prohibit any owner from altering or demolishing any buildings,
nor does it restrict subdivision or sale.
3. National Register designation can help lessen the negative impact on an
historic property from government funded projects. By law, an environmental
impact study is required for any federally-funded projects - such as road
building, utility installation, and public housing. Also, certain state projects
- such as road building, utility installation, and public housing. Also, certain
state projects are reviewed for their impact on historic resources. If any
project is deemed to have an adverse effect on historic buildings, archaeological
sites, or landscape features, the project may be redesigned to lessen that
effect.
4. National Register designation confers two types of financial benefits on
historic property owners. First, it allows the owner to claim investment tax
credits for certified rehabilitations if the building is used for income-
producing purposes. For additional information on the investment tax credit
program, contact the Department of Historic Resources, 221 Governor Street,
Richmond, VA 23219. (804) 786-3143.
National Register designation also makes properties eligible for matching
federal grants for historic preservation. Currently, federal funds are not
available for preservation projects.
5. Any restrictions on private property owners using private funds can only
be enacted by the local governing body, i.e., the city or town councilor the
county board of supervisors. Imposition of such restrictions does not
necessarily follow from National Reaister desianation.
SUMMARY
National Register designation:
1. Increases public awareness of a community's historic resources and
encourages preservation;
2. mitigates the negative impact of government-funded projects;
3. does not restrict the private property owner using private funds in any
way;
4. provides financial benefits, mainly in the form of tax incentives for
rehabilitation of income-producing buildings.
Rev. 3/90
1
RIGHTS OF OWNERS TO COHKENT AND/OR OBJECT TO LISTING
IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER
Owners of private proper~ies nomina~ed to the Natlonal
Reg~s~er have an opportunity ~o concur with or objec~ to lis~ing
in accord w~~h the National Historic Presrva~ion Act and 36 CFR
60. Any owner or partial owner of priva~e proper~y who chooses
to object to listing may submit, to the state Historic
Preservation Officer, a notarized statement certifying that the
party is the sole or partial owner of the private property and
objects to listing.
Each owner cr par~ial owner has one vote regardless cf the
por~lon cf the property that the party owns. :f a majori~y of
private property owners object, a proper~y will not be listed.
However, the State Historic Preservation Officer shall submit the
nomination to the Keeper of the National Register for a
determination of eligibility of the property for listing on the
National Register. If the property is then determined eligible
for listing, although not formally listed, Federal agencies will
be required to allow for the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation to have an OPportunity to commment before the agency
may fund. :icense, or assist a project which will affect the
property.
If vou choose to obiect to the listing of your property, the
notarized objection must be submitted to Hugh C. Miller, 22~
Governor street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219 before the scheduled
meeting of the State Review Board noted in your letter.
If vou wish to com=ent. on the nomination of the property to
the National Register, please send your comments to the State
Historic Preservation Officer at 221 Governor street, Richmond,
Virginia 23219 before the state Review Board considers this
nomination. A copy of the nomination and information on the
National Reqister and the Federal Tax provisions are available
from the above address upon request.
REV 1990
I
. ,
The Four Landmark Designations
The Virginia Landmarks Register
PlacIng propertIes on the VirgInIa Lmdmarks Register IS the official means by which the Board
of Histonc Resources carries out it legal mandate to "Designate historic landmarks..." (Sec.
10.1-2204. Code of VirE!Inia). BegInning in 1966. the Ge;eral Assembly acknowledged the
public beneiit of identIfying histone resources. and it created the landmarks designation program
as the non-regulatory vehicle for pursuing that public benefit. Under 1992 legislation. historic
property can no longer be formally designated a landmark if the property owner objects or, in
the case of a historic district. a majority of the owners object.
The Virginia Landmarks Register IS intended to encourage, but nor to reqUIre. the preservation
of a historic property by calling that historic signiticance to the attention of the owner and all
ochers responsible for land-use decisions that will determine the property's future. These
decisions may range from preserving the property through compromises that save part of the
property to total destruction of the historic resource. Placement of a property on the Virginia
Landmarks Register imposes absolutely no restrictions on the private owner of that property.
Similarly, local governments are not required to take the state's designation into consideration
in their plans and actions.
Benefits for owners of Virginia landmarks include eligibility for tinancial assistance and technical
assistance from the professional staff of the Department. Owners of registered landmarks may
also elect to protect their properties with a preservation easement. Each owner of a new
landmark receives an official state plaque with the name of the property.
The National Register of Historic Places
The National Register, established by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, is the list
of the buildings, sites and districts that define the nation's history. These properties may be of
local. state or national significance. Like the Virginia Landmarks Register, the National
Register is a fonnal planning tool to encourage the preservation of important resources by calling
attention to their significance. The owner of a National Register property is not restricted in
what he can do with that property. When Federal funds, licenses or permits are used, the
project review process will consider the impact of the project on the property.
An owner may prevent the formal listing of his property. In these cases, the Keeper of the
Register will not add the property to the Register; but will make a fonnal finding of "eligible
for the Register. " The properties are still considered significant, and federal agencies must still
take these "eligible" properties into account in determining the impact of their undertakings.
Owners of properties on the National Register are eligible for preservation grants; owners of
may also be eligible for tax credits when they rehabilitate their income-producing properties.
I
. .
\'ational Historic Landmarks
[he .\'atJonal Histonc Lmomarks (NHLl program provIdes official federal recognmon of
:l<lUonJ.jjy SIgnIfIcant propertIes. Only iOl VirgInla landmarks nave been oeslgnatea as NHLs
~1Y the Secretary of the Intenor.
'JatlOnal Historic Landmarks designation has essentially the same effect as National Register
lIstIng. Tilere IS no regulation of pnvate or nonfederal actions affecting National Landmarks.
The federal agency. must make every effort to mInimize harm to NHLs when contemplating
J proJect. But even with this additional encouragement toward preservation. the federal project
sponsor retaIns all final decision making about the landmark's preservation.
Benefits (0 owners of National Historic Landmarks are similar to those for National Register
property owners. The Depanment of the Interior also provides technical assistance and makes
an annual report to the U. S. Congress listing all threatened National Historic Landmarks.
Locally Designated Landmarks
Local 20vernments in Virginia can desiE:nate historic landmarks. Generallv. this local action is
~ ~ -
taken through the zoning ordinance: unlike the state and federal designations. it is intended to
regulate the property owner in a way that protects the designated landmark from unnecessary
destruction or insensitive alteration to the exterior.
The Code of Viq~inia lists protection against destruction of, or encroachment upon. historic areas
~s a proper function of local zoning ordinances. As a rule, historic district zones are considered
"overlay" zones that regulate design but do not change the underlying zoning category. Historic
~istrict zoning at the local level is carried out in a manner consistent with other zoning actions.
Irhe decisions about these ordinances rest entirely with the locality. It isn't necessary for the
tate to recognize a historic landmark before the application of a historic zone. Recognition of
, resource by the state does not obligate a local government to protect that resource.
lj.ocalities may provide tax abatements or other preservation incentives to owners of properties
t at have been designated "historic" or that are included in local historic districts.
... ,) .
O:stributed to Board: J.:.>29-"1 3-
Agendl lrem No, q 3, ~')dO"-} / .}. : ;}-;),)
1992
FOURTH QUARTER
BUILDING REPORT
County of Albemarle
Department of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
INDEX
I. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month (Charts A - B)
II. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Type (Charts C - D)
III. Comparison of All Building Permits (Chart E)
~ Comparison of Certificates of Occupancy (Charts F - H)
Key to Types of Housing Used in this Report
SF Single Family (Includes Modular)
SFA Single Family Attached
SFrrH Single Family Townhouse
DUP Duplex
MF Multi-Family Residence
MHC MobileHomes in County
.
.
-2-
During the fourth quarter of 1992, 128 permits were issued for
129 dwelling units. In addition, 8 permits were issued for mobile
homes in existing parks at an average exchange value of $2,500 for a
total of $20,000.
1. COMPARISON OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY MONTH
Chart A. Nine Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling
Units by Month
YEAR 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
JAN 86 46 37 38 22 93 56 64 183
FEB 39 29 43 35 40 172 68 31 72
MAR 78 94 37 62 91 61 92 57 64
APR 48 78 70 71 49 82 62 72
MAY 78 121 73 73 83 89 75 44 62
JUN 66 60 92 56 83 220 85 54 48
JUL 63 57 159 80 30 67 42 58 62
AUG 47 86 32 46 49 74 87 58, 126
SEP 52 35 49 45 46 72 90 55 48
OCT 41 40 52 60 52 56 48 39 43
NOV 33 45 50 49 60 301 37 42 49
DEC 82 53 35 40 46 55 42 50 37
TOTAL 725 714 737 654 673 1309 804 614 866
Chart B. Three Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling
Units by Month
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
o
- l
-
-
-
- V
;7 1/ / V
/ 1/ 1/ V
" / 1/ 1/
" V / / ""
1/ 1/ / /" " "'- "
-1/ / V /'" 1/"- " "'- ""'"
1/ V /" V"- " 1/ "'- 7" /
-/ " 1/ /~ 1/"- /"- / "'- /"'- 1/
-/ " / V /f'- V"- /j'. 1/ "'- / /j'. 1/
_/ " /" V ~ V"- / 1/ /"'- 1/ j'. 1/
1/ " /" V ~ V /f'- / /"'- / j'. 1/
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL Aue SEP OCT NOV DEC
IZZJ 1990
[s::sJ 1991
l22ZJ 1992
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
.
-3-
FOURTH QUARTER 1992
II. COMPARISON OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
Chart C. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by
Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type
MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL % TOTAL
DISTRICT SF .SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC D.U. D.U.
CHARLOTTESVILLE 4 0 7 0 0 0 11 9%
JACK JOUETT 1 O. 0 0 0 0 1 1%
RIVANNA 28 0 16 0 0 2 46 36%
SAMUEL MILLER 13 0 0 0 0 0 13 10%
SCOTTSVILLE 17 6 0 0 0 1 24 19%
WHITE HALL 21 6 0 0 2 5 34 26%
TOTAL 84 12 23 0 2 8 129 100%
Chart D. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by
Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type
DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS
COMP PIAN AREA SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC URBAN RURAL
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 4 0 11 0 0 0 15
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 7 6 0 0 0 0 13
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 . 2
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CROZET COMMUNITY 12 6 0 0 0 0 18
HOLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 11 0 12 0 0 0 23
SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EARLYSVILLE VILlAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PINEY MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RIVANNA VILlAGE 8 0 0 0 -0 0 8
GROWTH AREA SUBTOTAL 44 12 23 0 0 0 79
RURAL AREA 1 7 0 0 0 2 4 13'
RURAL AREA 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 8
RURAL AREA 3 16 0 0 0 0 1 17
RURAL AREA 4 11 0 0 0 0 1 12
RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 40 0 0 0 2 8 50
TOTAL 84 12 23 0 2 8 129
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and-Community Development
.
-4-
FOURT~ QUARTER 1992
III. COMPARISON OF ALL BUILDING PERMITS
Chart E. Estimated Cost of Construction by Magisterial District and Construction Type
MAGIS "ERIAL NEY *NEW NON-RES. NEW COMMERCIAL FARM BUILDING
DIST~ICT RESIDENTIAL & ALTER. RES. & NEW INSTITUT. & ALTER. COMM. TOTAL
No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$
CHVILU: 11 790,000 20 215,422 0 0 8 176,447 39 1,181,869
JOUETft. 1 74,999 6 64,800 0 0 2 6,500 9 146,299
RIVAN~A 46 3,956,957 49 724,590 2 1,250,000 6 120,800 103 6,052,347
S. MII-oLER 13 1,795,500 37 988,226 2 110,000 4 61,700 56 2,955,426
SCOTTSVILLE 24 2,324,395 21 482,528 0 0 2 7,550 47 2,814,473
WHITE HALL 33 2,462,512 37 566,636 2 13 , 500 5 1,829,755 77 4,872,403
TOIrAL 128 11,404,363 170 3,042,202 6 1,373,500 27 2,202,752 331 18,022,817
* Add tiona1 value of mobile homes placed in existing parks is included in Residential
A1t~ration category.
IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
Chart F. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Elementary
School District and Dwelling Unit Type
SCHOOL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL PERCENT
DISTRICT SF SFA S~/TH DUP MF MHC D.U. TOTAL D.U.
I\.gnor-Hurt 5 0 12 0 0 0 17 8.76%
~roadus Wood/Henley 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 2.06%
~roadus Wood/Jouett 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 3.09%
~rownsville 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 2.06%
Prozet 4 4 0 0 0 0 8 4.12%
~reer 1 0 4 0 0 0 5 2.58%
~ol1ymead 19 1 4 0 0 1 25 12.89%
~eriwether Lewis 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 5.67%
~urray 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 3.61%
~ed Hill 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 2.06%
pale/Burley 0 0 0 0 56 0 56 28.87%
~a1ejWa1ton 13 10 0 0 0 0 23 11.86%
Scottsville 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 2.06%
Stone Robinson/Burley 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 2.06%
Stone RobinsonjWa1ton 5 0 0 0 0 1 6 3.09%
Stony Point 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 4.64%
~oodbrook 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.52%
lTancey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
TOTAL 98 15 20 0 56 5 194 100.00%
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
,
~ ..
-5-
FOURTH QUARTER 1992
IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY (continued)
Chart G. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by
Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type
MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE
DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC TOTAL
CHARLOTTESVILLE 3 0 7 0 0 0 10
JACK JOUETT 6 0 0 0 0 0 6
RIVANNA 34 1 13 0 56 2 106
SAMUEL MILLER 17 0 0 0 0 0 17
SCOTTSVILLE 18 10 0 0 0 2 30
WHITE HALL 20 4 0 0 0 1 25
TOTAL 98 15 20 0 56 5 194
Chart H. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by
Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type
DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS
COMP PLAN AREA SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC URBAN RURAL
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 5
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 5 0 12 0 0 0 17
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 56 0 56
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 10 10 0 0 0 0 20
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CROZET COMMUNITY 4 4 0 0 0 0 8
HOLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 19 0 4 0 0 0 23
SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EARLYSVILLE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PINEY MTN. VILLAGE 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
RIVANNA VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GROWTH AREA SUBTOTAL 47 15 20 0 56 0 138.
RURAL AREA 1 20 0 0 0 0 1 21
RURAL AREA 2 11 0 0 0 0 2 1'3
RURAL AREA 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 10
RURAL AREA 4 10 0 0 0 0 2 12
RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 51 0 0 0 0 5 0 56
TOTAL 98 15 20 0 56 5 194
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
Distributed to Board: / - c:~ ?:: '!. 3-
02 "/-' )
Agend~ 11i',';1 i./;), 1.J' O<-:O~(~-/.2?J.
1992
YEAR END
BUILDING REPORT
..,)
. ....,<,......0....4
h
County of Albemarle
Department of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VlI'ginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
INDEX
I. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month (Charts A - B)
II. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Type (Charts C - D)
III. Comparison of All Building Permits (Chart E)
IV: Comparison of Certificates of Occupancy (Charts F - H)
Key to Types of Housing Used in this Report
SF
SFA
SFffH
DUP
MF
MHC
Single Family (Includes Modular)
Single Family Attached
Single Family Townhouse
Duplex
Multi-Family Residence
MobileHomes in County
-2-
During the year of 1992, 717 permits were issued for
866 dwelling units. In addition, 40 permits were issued for mobile
homes in existing parks at an average exchange value of $2,500 for a
total of $100,000. Of the aforementioned permits, 48 are condominiums.
I. COMPARISON OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY MONTH
Chart A. Nine Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling
Units by Month
YEAR 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
JAN 86 46 37 38 22 93 56 64 183
FEB 39 29 43 35 40 172 68 31 72
MAR 78 94 37 62 91 61 92 57 64
APR 60 48 78 70 71 49 82 62 72
MAY 78 121 73 73 83 89 75 44 62
JUN 66 60 92 56 83 220 85 54 48
JUL 63 57 159 80 30 67 42 58 62
AUG 47 86 32 46 49 74 87 58 126
SEP 52 35 49 45 46 72 90 55 48
OCT 41 40 52 60 52 56 48 39 43
NOV 33 45 50 49 60 301 37 42 49
DEC 82 53 35 40 46 55 42 50 37
TOTAL 725 714 737 654 673 1309 804 614 866
Chart B.
Three Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling
Units by Month
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
l
i 10
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
o
JAN rES MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEe
IZ2J 1990
[s:sJ 1991
I22ZJ 1992
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
-3-
YEAR END
II. COMPARISON OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
Chart C. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by
Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type
MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL % TOTAL
DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC D.U. D.U.
CHARLOTTESVILLE 15 0 12 0 0 0 27 3%
JACK JOUETT 12 O' 0 0 66 0 78 9%
RIVANNA 158 45 66 0 144 4 417 48%
SAMUEL MILLER 85 0 0 0 0 1 86 10%
SCOTTSVILLE 113 21 0 0 0 6 140 16%
WITE HALL 82 25 0 0 2 9 118 14%
TOTAL 465 91 78 0 212 20 866 100%
Chart D. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by Comprehensive
Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type
DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS
COMP PLAN AREA SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC URBAN RURAL
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 24 0 50 0 0 0 74
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 144 0 144
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 58 21 0 0 0 0 79
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 24 0 0 0 0 0 24
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 66 0 66
CROZET COMMUNITY 26 25 0 0 0 0 51
HOLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 75 0 28 0 0 0 103
SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EARLYSVILLE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
PINEY MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 1 45 0 0 0 0 46
RIVANNA VILLAGE 11 0 0 0 0 0 11
GRO'WTH AREA SUBTOTAL 223 91 78 0 210 0 602
RURAL AREA 1 48 0 0 0 2 7 57
RURAL AREA 2 50 0 0 0 0 4. 54
RURAL AREA 3 82 0 0 0 0 3 - 85
RURAL AREA 4 62 0 0 0 0 6 68
RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 242 0 0 0 2 20 264
TOTAL 465 91 78 0 212 20 866
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
I I
..... "- .
-4-
YEAR E ND
III. bOMPARISON OF ALL BUILDING PERMITS
bhart E. Estimated Cost of Construction by Magisterial District and Construction Type
MAGIST iERIAL NEW *NEW NON-RES. NEW COMMERCIAL FARM BUILDING
DISTR ~CT RESIDENTIAL & ALTER. RES. & NEW INSTlTUT. & ALTER. COMM. TOTAL
No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$
CHVILL~ 27 1,870,000 83 714,174 7 6,145,000 55 1,654,197 172 10,383,371
JOUETT 63 6,833,999 54 2,837,492 6 1,393,675 12 615,550 135 11,680,716
RIVANN ~ 284 25,123,157 211 2,922,395 21 8,010,108 27 5,359,000 543 41,414,660
S. MIl jl..ER 86 13,625,700 188 4,385,191 5 305,500 24 708,500 303 19,024,891
SCOTTS IvILLE 140 10,719,958 139 1,851,520 7 172,500 12 191,400 298 12,935,378
WHITE JIALL 117 10,682,516 199 2,851,741 11 301,000 23 2,036,374 350 15,871,631
TOT ~L 717 68,855,330 874 15,562,513 57 16,327,783 153 10,565,021 1,801 111,310,647
* Addi ~iona1 value of mobile homes placed in existing parks is included in Residential
A1te ~ation category.
IV. C~RTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
CJ:1art F. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Elementary
School District and Dwelling Unit Type
SCHOOL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL PERCENT
DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC D.U. TOTAL D.U.
Agnor-Hurt 11 0 23 0 0 0 34 4.59%
Broadus Wood/Henley 7 0 0 0 0 2 9 1. 22%
Broadus Wood/Jouett 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.89%
Brownsvi11e 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 2.03%
Clrozet 21 23 0 0 0 0 44 5.95%
Greer 3 0 4 0 24 0 31 4.19%
Hp11ymead 95 10 23 0 0 1 129 17.43%
M~riwether Lewis 30 0 0 0 0 2 32 4.32%
Murray 27 4 0 0 0 1 32 4.32%
Rled Hill 16 0 0 0 0 0 16 2.16%
C~le/Bur1ey 9 0 20 0 89 0 118 15.95%
C~lejWa1ton 88 24 0 0 0 0 112 15.14%
S~ottsvi11e 13 0 0 0 0 2 15 2.03%
S~one Robinson/Burley 21 0 0 0 36 1 58 7.84%
S~one RobinsonjWa1ton 23 0 0 0 0 1 24 3.24%
S~ony Point 35 0 0 0 0 0 35 4.73%
Wpodbrook 4 0 10 0 0 0 14 1. 89%
Ylincey 7 0 0 0 0 1 8 1.08%
TOTAL 439 61 80 0 149 11 740 100.00%
.
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
.
....../_ .J .
-5-
YEAR END
IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY (continued)
Chart G. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by
Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type
MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE
DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC TOTAL
CHARLOTTESVILLE 14 0 19 0 0 0 33
JACK JOUETT 16 0 0 0 24 0 40
RIVANNA 162 10 61 0 125 2 360
SAMUEL MILLER 78 4 0 0 0 3 85
SCOTTSVILLE 113 24 0 0 0 4 141
WHITE HALL 56 23 0 0 0 2 81
TOTAL 439 61 80 0 149 11 740
Chart H. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by
Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type
DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS
COMP PLAN AREA SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC URBAN RURAL
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 5
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 23 0 53 0 9 0 85
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 116 0 116
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 58 24 0 0 0 0 82
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 24 0 0 0 0 0 24
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 3 4 0 0 0 0 7
URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 24 0 24
CROZET COMMUNITY 15 23 0 0 0 0 38
HOLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 91 0 23 0 0 0 114
SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
EARLYSVILLE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PINEY MTN. VILLAGE 0 10 0 0 0 0 10
NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 6 0 0 0 0 0 6
RIVANNA VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GROWTH AREA SUBTOTAL 223 61 80 0 149 0 513
RURAL AREA 1 47 0 0 '0 0 2 49
RURAL AREA 2 56 0 0 0 0 2 58
RURAL AREA 3 60 0 0 0 0 4 64
RURAL AREA 4 53 0 0 0 0 3 56
RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 216 0 0 0 0 11 227
TOTAL 439 61 80 0 149 11 740
Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development
BLUE RIDGE COMMITTEE FOR SHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK RELATIONS
January 7, 1993
Present were: Walter Perkins - Albemarle County, steve Hodapp -
iShenandoah National Park, Betty Owens - Rockingham County, J. W.
l~ade - Shenandoah National Park, Sandy Rives - Shenandoah National
~ark, Mike Massie, Rappahannock County, R. P. Anderson,
~appahannock County, Bill Veno - Rockingham County, Randy Collins -
Warren County, Joe Correa - Rockingham County, and David Jones -
l~adison County
bress represented: Sean Kilpatrick, Rappahannock News
Derek Barr, Harrisonburg Daily News-Record
Luanne Austin, Daily News-Record
Bill Gentry - The Valley Banner
NEXT MEETING: RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTYLIB!UffiY
TIME: 6:00P.M. DATE:APRIL1,1~93<
"he meeting was called to order by Chairman David Jones. Mr. Jones
Explained the purpose of the conuni ttee was for a dialogue of issues
cf mutual interest with the Shenandoah National Park and
I eighboring eight counties. Introductions were made and Sandy
lives of the Shenandoah National Park pointed out that since there
~ere more than four counties present we had a quorum.
Iiscussions were as follows:
Update by the Park on secondary roads and status of Bacon
Hollow tract in Greene County.
Mr. Rives pointed out a bill introduced by Congressman Allen
to transfer secondary roads in the Shenandoah National Park
back to the State of Virginia without equal value exchange
required did not pass Congress. Without the bill passing,
the State of Virginia's commission is still studying the
issue. Senator Frank Nolan and others are studying the issue
of the 14-15 segments of roads originally proposed for
transfer by exchange to get these segments out of the Park.
Shenandoah National Park's position is they are awaiting the
results of their study before proceeding with working with
VDOT on solving this issue, which is due around April 1.
COUNTY Of AlBEMARlI
n~~
If ,... ()!) 1993~ "
~,:--<., r~- '.
':0, .,~",' 1>" ,~ftQ\ 'ft i1t. " ;,IIi
[XiCUTIVE OfFiCi
Page 2
In order for the Rt. 340 project to begin, as called for by
the environmental impact statement on the segment of road at
the Rt. 340 end, the agreement in which Congressman Slaughter,
Senator Warner, and Senator Robb participated, was that land
be transferred by equal value exchange for a parcel of land in
Greene County, which has taken place.
Mr. Jones asked for an explanation of why some of the
exchanges are fee simple and others strictly right of way.
Rives: The preferred method of acceptance by the State of
Virginia was a permanent easement. VDOT does not accept fee
simple on a lot of segments of roads that are federal highways
(ieo' 1-95 going through Prince William Forest Park is a
permanent deed of easement which was preferred by VDOT). They
prefer permanent easements.
Wade: Similar exchange of some lands left over from widening
Rt. 33 and Rt. 211 culminated exchange in a similar manner.
Virginia accepted as a permanent easement.
~) Congressman Allen, Butch Davies, and Senator Robbls office
sent regrets for not being able to attend our meeting.
Money for the secretary of this group for postage and
stationery
It was decided that each county and the Shenandoah National
Park would send $5 to the secretary, Betty Owens to cover
expenses.
~) Update on related lands study
Rives: A newsletter is going out on the related lands study.
The University of' Virginia is prepar1ng final maps and
reports. Open houses will be held at Elkton on February 6
from 1-4 P.M. and at Crozet on February 13 from 1-4 P.M.
After looking at comments, updating maps, and getting final
report from UVA, another newsletter will be mailed based upon
UVA's report. No determination has been made regarding the
land study for 1993. Presently, the Park has only limited
dollars to do the study--maybe not enough to do one county.
Wade: They are looking into other options to be able to carry
on. It will be late spring before a determination is made.
Jim Klein of UVA has notified Wade the study was complete and
results are being printed.
Rives: Timetable - First the open houses in February and then
another month to get the final report from UVA--final report
around March 15.
l>age 3
Wade: The open houses are strictly open houses--not public
meetings. They feel the open houses are the most useful
mechanism. The final report will be presented to the Board of
Supervisors in Albemarle and Rockingham Counties.
Conclusions will be made based on input all along and input of
Jim Klein to guide their actions and others for a period of
time following the final report.
A request was made to have Albemarle's maps at the Elkton open
house and Mr. Wade agreed.
Mr. Jones asked if there would be a review between the Board
of Supervisors and Park Service on critical or moderate areas
in which both were in disagreement.
Wade: If landowner or third party might offer by donation
land to be gi ven to the Park, no change is proposed or
expected in acquisition authority as a result of this. As a
result of information from the related land study, a better
picture of resource values in geographic areas wi thin the
authorized boundary that will be identified and available to
the Board of Supervisors. If the Board doesn't agree, then
there should be a discussion with them. The Park bases their
conclusions on values and purposes for which the Park was
created.
~ } Bears
Rappahannock asked if the Park had any objections to a request
to the Game Commission that bear season open the same day of
deer season to reduce bear population which has been
destroying orchards.
Wade: Data indicates the bear population in the Park
(monitoring 10-15 years) is stable and around 600 bears. The
Shenandoah National Park has no objection to hunting season on
bears being extended. He can envision certain areas of land
within the authorized boundary that through their analysis,
etc. can conclude this land should be protected and kept from
being subdivided and left in a natural way but be legitimate
to still hunt on.
6} Budget shortfall
Wade: Reported on actions for the remainder of 1993.
Matthews Arm campground will not be open the entire year. Not
operating Camp Hoover. Big Meadows campground will not be
opened until Memorial Day. There are a host of other
adjustments in terms of scheduling, hiring, etc. to meet the
budget. There are approximately 30 vacant positions including
age 4
two division chief positions, that will probably not be
filled. Out of 50 permanent, less than full-time employees,
can expect some of these people will not be working for their
full term. Reduced operations such as interpretive programs,
abilities to respond to accidents, etc. delay because do not
have as many seasonal people. They are operating this fiscal
year with a quarter million dollars less than last year.
Ri ves: Senator Robb said there was no more money available ih
the budget.
Question: Will there be a fight every year to keep the
Shenandoah National Park open?
Wade: May have to.
Question: Have you considered keeping the Drive open in the
winter months only on weekends?
Wade: Have considered this. It sounds a legitimate one but
not easy to manage.
Rives: Money collected at entrance stations does not come
back to the Shenandoah National Park--nor campgrounds. Money
collected goes to the Treasury.
A comment was made by Rappahannock that before the Skyline
Drive closes , this group should know.
Wade: Preliminary indications of the '93 budget prompted them
to act to meet their budget allocations. It is important as
many counties and people attend this meeting to have dialogue
to discuss these issues. By June of this year he will have an
idea of the 1994 budget.
David Jones pointed out that areas with major access points
might suffer.
Wade: At Big Meadows, instead of the Park putting rangers
there to staff collection fees, etc., the responsibility was
turned over to contractors running the reservation system.
The contractor will raise camping fees $2 per night. Many'are
very unhappy about rangers not doing this.
,Joe Correa stated the focus should be local.
Randy Collins asked if increasing the number of volunteers
would help.
Wade: Volunteers can help up to a point. 12,000 hours of
volunteers now--training, orientation, supervision--costs.
age 5
Rives: As a result of publicity, there has been a tremendous
number of people volunteering to help. The Potomac and
Appalachian Trail Clubs are their most effective volunteers.
Next Meeting:
Next meeting scheduled for April 1 at Rappahannock County
Library
6:00 P.K.
Items for discussion: 1) Related lands study 2) VDOT 3)
Budget 4) Va. Tech study
Directions: As you come into county via Rt. 211 (from over
the mountain) you will bypass small village of Sperryville;
stay on Rt. 211 and it will take you directly to the new
Rappahannock County Library on the left (about 4.5 miles).
You will pass several entrances (exits) into the town of
Washington, the last, directly across from the recreational
park; then venture several hundred yards to the library on the
left.
Comments/Questions from audience:
1) Who sets the criteria for primary and secondary resource
values in the related lands study?
Wade: The Park will.
2) Two years ago the Director of Park Services wanted the
Gore tract. Why has the Park had a change of heart?
Wade: This is one of those areas that lends itself to
the need for some level of protection. The Park was
approached by the Conservation Fund to accept the land if
they bought and donated it. Mr. Wade suggested the
consideration of other possible use for the land such as
donation to tha Wildlife ~ianagement. After review, etc.
the Conservation Fund's final decision was to donate to
the State.
3) What are the boundaries on the related land study?
Wade: The area between what is currently in federal
ownership and the 521,000 acres of authorized boundary.
4) Status of the Light tract?
Wade: Will accept at the end of the current lease.
1-
[I'^t,. \... ute 0' ,,, ~""'d' (-c2 Cj-917
U'.3 IIJ W \..I'VQtU. _~.....
5:;J, doL () 3 I S-~)
Agenda Item No. __. _...__ -_
WOODS, ROGERS &. HAzIEGROVE
Roanoke Office
Dominion Tow~r . Suite 1400
10 South Jeffer on Street. P.O. Box 14125
Roanoke, Virgi ia 24038-4125
Telephone 703 983,7&00
Facsimile 703, 83,7711
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL TELEPHONE
Danville Office
530 Main Street. P.O. Box 5&0
Danville, Virginia 24543,05&0
Telephone B04,791-1350
Facsimile 804.799-3527
(703) 983-7636
January 22, 1993
In re:
Appalachian Power Company
Application for a General Increase in Rates;
sec Case No. PUE920081
[ear Madam or Sir:
On behalf of Appalachian Power Company, and pursuant to the
Etate Corporation Commission's Order for Notice and Hearing
entered on January 12, 1993, we serve you with a copy of that
C rder .
Sincerely,
WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE C7~
~~~;<'-
H. Allen Glover, Jr.
H~Gjr:mbh
enc.
I
.
j
OOMMONWI!ALm OF V1RGlNIA 9 :50 11 0 3 9 S
STAlE CORPORATION COMMISSION
'1~
-,
".. \..,"
.0'
.,
. -..' ~.... .
.. i.J I..: : ,,-I l I
..' .~. I I . .
AT RICHMOND, JANUARY 12, - 1993
APPLI~~IO~:-~: ~:.~
\....... ..~ ~..,
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
JAN 1 8 1993
CASE HO. PUE920081
..
For a general increase in rates
ORDER FOR NOTICE AND HEARYN'G
On December 4, 1992, Appalachian Power Company
(-Appalachian- or -company-) filed its application seeking an
increase in its jurisdictional electric rates designed to produce
additional annual revenues of $31,377,417. The additiona~
revenues sought by the Company would result in an average annual
increase of 5.5% over present Virginia rates. By order dated
December 29, 1992, the state Corporation Commission
(-Commission-) suspended the proposed rates for a period of one
hundred fifty days from the date of application or to and through
Kay 3, 1993.
NOW, UPON CONSIDERATION of Appalachian's application and
the applicable statutes, the Commission is of the opinion that a
Hearing Examiner should be appointed to conduct further
proceedings in this matter; that the Company should be required
to give notice to the public of its application; that members of
the Commission's staff should conduct a full investigation into
the reasonableness of the Company's proposed tariff revisions and
present their findings in testimony at the public hearing
scheduled herein; and that a public hearing should be convened to
receive evidence relevant to the Company's application.
. (( . ','
. .:
'.
"
.'
,
.'
'.,i
I
...;
.'
i
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
(1) That, pursuant to Rule 7:1 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (-Rules.), a Hearing Examiner is appointed
to conduct all further proceedings in this matter;
(2) That a public hearing before the Hearing Exaainer is
scheduled for May 18, 1993, beginninq at 10:00 a.a., in the
Commission's Second Floor Courtrooa in the Tyler Buildinq, 1300
East, Main Street, Richmond, Virginia for the purpose of receiving
evidence relevant to the Company's application;
(3) That, on or before January 22, 1993, Appalachian shall
make copies of its application, supporting exhibits, prefiled
direct testimony, and all other documents relevant to its
application available for public inspection during regular
business hours at all of its offices where customer bills may be
paid;
(4) That discovery shall be conducted in accordance with
Part VI of the RUles, except that Appalachian and any Protestants
herein shall respond to written interrogatories within ten (10)
days of receipt of same and that objections to any data request
on any basis shall be filed within five (5) days of receipt of
the data request. Any objection to any data request not timely
raised may be subject to waiver;
(5) That the Commission's Staff shall investigate the
reasonableness of the Company's application and proposed tariff
revisions and shall present its findings and conclusions in
testimony at the public hearing scheduled herein;
2
:', .
:.'
..
.
':
..j
:t
-.
,
h
,
,I
I
.
.
-
(6) That on or before February 19, 1993, any person
desiring to participate as a Protestant, as defined in Rule 4:6,
shall file with the Clerk of the Commission an original and
fifteen (15) copies of a Notice of Protest as provided in Rule
5:16(a) and shall serve a copy of saae upon counsel for the
Company, H. Allen Glover, Jr., Esquire, Woods, RocJers, ,
Hazlegrove, 10 South Jefferson street, P.O. Box 14125, Roanoke,
Virginia 24018-4125;
(7) That, within five (5) days of the receipt of any Notice
of Protest, the Company shall serve upon each Protestant a copy
of the application and all material relevant to the application
now or hereafter filed with the Commission;
(8) That any person who expects to submit evidence, cross-
,examine witnesses or otherwise participate in the proceeding as a
Protestant, pursuant. to Rule 4:6, shall file on or before
April 13, 1993, an original and fifteen (15) copie$ of a Protest
with the Clerk of the Commission, clo Document Control Center,
P.o. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216, and simultaneously serve
a copy thereof upon counsel for the Company at the address set
out above and upon any other Protestant. The Protest shall set
forth (i) a precise statement of the interest of, the Protestant
in the proceeding; (il) a full and clear statement of the facts
which the Protestant is prepared to prove by competent evidence;
and (iii) a statement of the specific relief sought and the legal
basis therefor. Any corporate entity that wishes to submit
evidence, cross-examine witnesses or otherwise participate as a
3
. I.,:
. ~.
'';I
'/
I.
}
. "1
;
I
I
.'';:
'.
.
.,
.,
"
'~
.i
.':
.
.
".1
i
:
Protestant must be represented by legal counsel in accordance
with 'the requirements of Rule 4: 8;
(9) That, on or before April 13, 1993, each Protestant
shall file with the Clerk of the Commission at the address set
out above an original and fifteen (15) copies of the prepared
testimony and exhibits the Protestant intends to present at the
public hearing, and shall serve a copy of the prepared testimony
and exhibits upon counsel for the Company, at the address set out
in Paragraph (6) above, and upon any other Protestant;
(10) That, on or before April 22, 1993, the Commission
staff shall file with the Clerk of the Commission an original and
fifteen (15) copies of the prepared testimony and exhibits the
staff intends to present at the public hearing scheduled herein
and shall serve a copy of said testimony and exhibits upon
counsel for the Company and upon each Protestant;
(11) That, on or before May 4, 1993, the Company shall file
with the Clerk of the Commission an original and fifteen (15)
copies of all prepared testimony and exhibits it expects to
introduce in rebuttal to all prefiled direct testimony and
exhibits; additional rebuttal evidence may be presented by the
Company without prefiling, provided it in response to evidence
which was not prefiled, but rather was elicited at the hearing,
and, provided further, that the need for such additional rebuttal
evidence is timely addressed by motion during the hearing and
leave to present said evidence is granted by the Hearing
Examiner. The Company shall serve a copy of its prefiled
rebuttal testimony and exhibits upon all parties of record;
4
I
. ,
-
(12) That any person desiring to comment in writing on the
Company's application may do so by directing such comments on or
before April 13, 1993, to the Clerk of the Commission, c/o
Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia' 23216.
Such comments must refer to Case No. PUE920081. Any person
desiring to make a statement, at the public hearing concerning
this application need only appear in the Commission's Second
Floor Courtroom in the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main Street,
Richmond, Virginia at 9:30 a.a. on the day of the hearing and
identify himself or herself to the Bailiff as a public'witness;
(13) That, on or before February 28, 1993, the Company
shall complete the PUblication of the fOllowing notice by
pUblishing the same as display advertising (not classified
advertising) once a week for two successive weeks in newspapers
of. general circulation throughout the Company's service territory:
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF AN APPLICATION FOR A
GENERAL INCREASE IN RATES BY APPALACHIAN
POWER COMPANY - CASE NO. PUE920081
On December 4, 1992, Appalachian Power
Company (-AppalaChian- or -Company-) filed
its application seeking an increase in its
jurisdictional electric rates designed to
produce additional annual revenues of
$31,377,417. The additional revenues sought
by the Company would result in an average
annual increase of 5.5' over present Virginia
rates. The State Corporation Commission
(-Commission6), by order dated December 29,
1992, suspended the proposed rates for one
hundred fifty (150) days, to and through
May 3, 1993. The proposed rates may go into
effect, subject to refund, on May 4, 1993,
pending the outcome of this investigation.
The application proposes a number or
revisions to the Company's terms and
conditions of service, the details of which
are set forth in the application. Interested
5
t.' ,
. ~ ~
, .
.;
persons are encouraged to review the
application and its supporting material for
the details of the revisions proposed by the
Company.
The Commission has scheduled a public
hearing before a Hearing ExaJainer for
10:00 a.m., on May 18, 1993, in the
Commission's Second Ploor Courtroom in the
Tyler Building, 1300 East Main street,
RiChmond, Virginia for the purpose of
receiving evidence relevant to the Company's
application. Interested persons should be
advised that after considerinq all of the
evidence, the COllllllission may prescribe rates,
fees, charqes, and terms and conditions of
service for Appalachian which differ from
those appearing in the company's application.
A copy of Appalachian's application is
available for pUblic inspection during
regular business hours at any of the
Company's offices where customer bills may be
paid and, from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, in the Document Control
Center, presently located on Floor B-1 of the
Jefferson Building, 1220 Bank Street,
RicJmond, Virginia. After March 5, 1993, the
Document Control Center will be located in
the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main street,
,RiChmond, Virginia, and the application may
be inspected at this location during regular
business hours followinq this date.
Any person desiring to comment in
writing on the application may do so by
directing such comments on or before
April 13, 1993, to the Clerk of the State
Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control
Center, P.O. Box 2118, RiChmond, Virginia
23216. Written comments concerning this
application must refer to Case No. PUE920081.
Any person desiring to make a statement at
the public hearing need only appear in the
Commission's Second Floor Courtroom at
9:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing and
identify himself or herself to the Bailiff as
a public witness.
On or-before February 19, 1993, any
person desiring to participate as a .
Protestant, as defined in Rule 4:6 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(.Rules.) and to present evidence and cross-
6
'~. .
. .
. .
.
.~
examine witnesses shall file an original and
fifteen (15) copies of a Notice of Protest,
as provided by Rule 5:16(a), with the Clerk
of the Commission at the address set out
above and shall serve a.copy of said Notice
ot Protest on Appalachian and on all other
parties of record. Service upon the Company
shall be. directed to B. Allen Glover, Jr.,
Esquire, Woods, ROCJers II Bazlegrove, P.O.
Box 14125, Roanoke, Virginia 24018-4125.
Within five (5) days of the receipt of
any Notice of protest, the Cooperative shall
serve upon each Protestant a copy of the
application and all material relevant to the
application now or hereafter filed with the
Commission.
':.
.t
~"j
Any person who expects' to submit
evidence, cross-examine witnesses or
otherwise participate in the proceeding as a
Protestant, pursuant to RUle 4:6, shall file
on or before April 13, 1993, an original and
fifteen (15) copies ot a Protest with the
Clerk of the Commission at the address set
out above, and simultaneously serve a copy
thereof upon counsel for the Company and upon
any other Protestants. The Protest shall set
forth (i) a precise statement of the interest
ot the Protestant in the proceeding; (ii) a
full and clear statement of the facts which
the Protestant is prepared to prove by
competent evidence; and (iii) a statement. of
the specific relief sought and the leqal
basis therefor. Any corporate entity that
wishes to submit evidence, cross-examine
wit.ness or otherwise participate as a
Protestant must be represented by leqal
counsel in accordance with the requirements
of Rule 4:8.
On or before April 13, 1993, each
Protestant shall file with the Clerk of the
Commission at the address set out above an
original and fifteen (15) copies of
the prepared testimony and exhibits the
Protestant intends to present at the hearing
and shall serve a copy upon Appalachian and
upon any other Protestant. All testimony
and exhibits filed herein shall refer to Case
No. PUE920081.
All written communications to the
Commission should be directed to William J.
7
-
. L-.2 C;' - C;'3
, "j : ..J ,\ ... -'. ~ '.' ~ . . ,.,.-
D'otl'I''''"'' , fr, l., ___--
l,)~ UU~......... lo", l..-'j..........
~1~~'):J-qziS~ ~ s)
COUNTY OF ALBEMAR(~da lt~ffl 'ill.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
January 29, 1993
of supervisors ~
County Executive~1
Albemarle County Board
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
RE: Recycling Data - RSWA
A tached are data from the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority that I
t ought you would find of interest. The first sheet provides you
w'th the recycling statistics for the Charlottesville/Albemarle
a ea, reflecting a 23.6% recycling rate for our area. As you know,
E A and state mandates require a recycling rate of 20% by the end
o 1993 and a rate of 25% by 1995. It appears we will easily
e ceed the 1995 mandate.
e second sheet provides the results of a one week survey of the
Intire Recycling Center. I believe our educational efforts will
ve a positive affect on this data, particularly from business
rticipation and reporting.
T,Jr/dbm
.014
tachments(2)
. .... I' -
PRELIMINARY 1992 RECYCLING RATES - RIVANNA SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY
_~m::;!ll"~I!
mll~
WMI Pro
Leaf co
Busines
White g
Subtota
ram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1)
lection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recycl ing ................................. (1)
ods pick-up ................................ (1)
2,561
1,967
486
89
~.-:~.....-:y........:-......>:............,
~_~~;x:;;~::\:~:;~ :~~I
comming ed
Busines Recycling
Subtota
!J1f~
Recycli
Landfil
HHW Col
RWSA Co
g Centers
Recycling
ection
post
swu!1
BFI
UVa
BRYANT
COINERS
MICHIE
SIEMANS
Total
5,103
i,1StUi
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1)
232
629
861
i,1StHi
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~. . . . . . . . . (1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1)
2,566
328
1
3,435
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,330
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I~!t~
800
818
711
6,087
2,073
LOOO
*
*
*
*
*
*
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11,487
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23,781
Waste
to recycling mandate ("B"): ........... (2)
77,092
arily diverted from landfill
efined by Virginia Department of Waste Management (equals solid waste
fro households, plus recyclables from businesses, whether recycled or
not. )
* wil provide documented data at the end of February.
"
The survey at the McIntire Recycling center took place between
ednesday the 13th through Monday the 18th.
Total Albemarle city Other
ed: 349 199 137 13
406 207 183 16
414 225 175 14
546 312 226 8
224 128 95 1
425 262 160 3
OTAL: 2,364 1,333 976 55
per hour Businesses
county city total
35 12 29 41
40 26 36 62
41 20 43 63
68 21 19 40
64 6 18 24
42 13 27 40
----------------------------
Total: 98 172 270
Edward H. Ba! , Jr.
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
David p, Bow rman
Charlottesvill
Charlotte y, H mphris
Jack Jouett
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Board of Supervisors
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC
B<-:C/
January 29, 1993
Reading List for February 3, 1993
12, 1992 - All - Mr. r-lartin (I/Ute v(((--
19, 1992 - pages 11 - 22 - Mr. Bain
rch 11, 1992 (A) - All - Mrs. Humphris
,IS:-
\..~.
e c
*
Printed on recycled paper
o:~t. ::;. ',:2: ': ~,;:.., ~ , l...:~9 - 9'0;5
,r;) ::? () ~ -:.2 /
,....,.'.1.1. :'.:,r,'. '.' ';:1'.;;;.>,.0,;2 OJ"'~
, ., ,.... ."). --.-------
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S, Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
,\ .',. '
, \~(/ (-
.,
( l__
~ '..
Edward H. am. ,Jr
Samuel Miler
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
correst R Marshall. Jr
Scousville
David P 80 erman
Charlolles ille
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
JiKk Joue t
Walter F PerKins
White Hall
February 9, 1993
. Dan Roosevelt
sident Engineer
partment of Transportation
o. Box 2013
arlottesville, VA 22902-0013
ar Mr. Roosevelt:
Following are the actions taken by the Albemarle County
ard of supervisors at its meeting on February 3, 1993:
Agenda Item No. 7a. Discussion:, Designation of Roads for
National Highway System.
DEFERRED to February 17, 1993 to allow the Metropolitan
anning organization an opportunity to review this matter.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Other Highway Matters.
CONSENSUS of the Board that staff prepare a report on the
chanics of holding a bond issue, estimate of the size of issue
cessary to fund road projects that are pending and related
i formation. Mrs. Humphris requested that her analysis of
ovember 20, 1991, be included in the report.
Agenda Item No.8. Resolution to request Industrial Access
unds form the Department of Transportation to construct
Industrial Access Road in Mill Creek Industrial Park.
ADOPTED a resolution requesting Industrial Access Funds from
Department of Transportation to construct and Industrial
ccess Road in Mill Creek Industrial P~rk, and instructed the
ounty Attorney to obtain the necessary surety from Mill Creek
and Trust to guarantee that the Board will note involve local
(1)
Printed on recycled paper
.r
M . Dan Roosevelt
J nuary 12, 1993
P ge 2
f nds in this project should the Board's bond to the state be
f rfeited at the end of the three year period. Attached is the
o iginal resolution. The Board also ADOPTED the attached policy
g verning requests for use of Industrial Access funds from the
C mmonwealth of Virginia to construct an industrial access road.
Sincerely,
/./(~ll{J { (?t[d{i / /)
'Ella w. carey,l'lerk, CMC
;f .
Board of, supe~lsors
E C/jnh
tachments
c Robert w. Tucker, Jr.
Robert B. Brandenburger
- ~'"';;'_o,:;JM~~~,
.-A ~
I: ! ;' I " '"'.., /c ~l
DATE \. ie'- ( I I (~ l - /')
,",--,',,-," " .... ! ,
~/" \.......-.. .~., ",-j I
I - " /
! ~, / !
~GENDA ITEM NO .~ ~
. I "
<(' \
AGENDA ITEM NAME L >, I I " f -
\ ~ : I I 1..) !. I: ) ('-1 ');..(,,/ i f :
/ , , '. .' " " - I I '- , ,
/' J ~-1~/(: /) ~l'( i tl ,-
\..): \ I " i. " r_L~--(, f ..........., :. ) Iri
\'(,...- 0 - '.
( .'
, () ;L.'
DEFERRED UNTIL '\,- i " I
, ~_.. '. , '_,I { > t ! / / , i
'. I ,.;,
, /
Form . 3
7 / 25/ 86
,
If; ~ d'e cL. ,xlY;?3
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
FEBRUARY 1, 1993
IROUTE I
INO. I
+------+--~----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
STATUS
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
I 250
I
I
I 20
I
LOCATION
EST.COMP I
DATE I
I
I S~. CLAIR AVE. TO RTE. 64
I
I
I
, I
CONSTRUCTION 68% COMPLETE
SEP 93
I
I A\. INT. ROUTE 742 (AVON ST. EXT.)
I
CONSTRUCTION 32% COMPLETE
MAY 93
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
I 654
I
I
I B RRACKS RD. - FR. RTE. 1406
I TO GEORGETOWN RD.
CONSTRUCTION 20% COMPLETE
MAY 93
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
I 631
I
I
I S.H STREET EXT.
I S ROUTE I-64
CONSTRUCTION STARTED DEC. 1992
I
DEC 93 **1
I
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-- ----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
* REVISEI DATE
** NEW PRCJECT
ANALYSIS
of
CATS FUNDING, PRIMARY and SECONDARY ROAD PROGRAMS
by
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Supervisor, Jack Jouett District
November 20, 1991
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Meeting
County Office Building, McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
REMARKS: CATS, SECONDARY AND PRIMARY ROAD PROGRAMS
NOVEMBER 20, 1991
uring the years that I served on the MPO Technical Committee and
since I have been a member of this board, it has seemed to me that some
planning and informational tools were needed for decision making that
we di not have.
the
will
Trans
Bypas
1990.
was this more evident to me than during the Commonwealth
Board's meetings concerning the proposed Alternative 10
at Natural Bridge in October,1990 and in Manassas in November,
I felt that, had we been able to put into the hands of the CTB
the correct information which they needed for proper decision
but were not provided by their staff, the decision would surely
different. But all we could do was to say, "That isn't
We had no data to support our position.
makin
have
bothersome situation surfaced for me again with the recent
of Secretary Milliken for changes in the way transportation
are to be funded and implemented in our localities. When
makes more specific proposals, we need the tools which
us to know how we in Albemarle County will be affected, how
secondary and primary road programs will be affected.
I propose a starting pOint by suggesting the compilation of data
in ways which provide us with a better road map, so to speak, something
TABLE 1
1 .
a. only 10 are Secondary
b. 7 are Primary
c. 10 are Urban (City)
2.
a. 17 are required to relieve 29 North traffic
b. 10 are not required to relieve 29 North Traffic
(such as # 22, for example, Madison Ave. Extd.)
3.
1. # 18 Rio Road/250 Connector (circled)
2. # 19 - Rio Rd./29N Interchange
3. # 21 - Georgetown Road
4. # 23 Hydraulic Rd./29N Interchange
5. # 26 HYdraulic Rd./250 Bypass Interchange
6. #27 - Meadowcreek Pkwy./Rio Rd. to 29N
Rio Road/250 Connector; Georgetown Road; Meadowcreek
Parkway.
HYdraulic Road/250 Bypass
Interchange
Rio. and Hydraulic Rd./29N
Interchanges.
?
my analysis, it is very obvious that, if projected funding is
accur we can easily complete our CATS Secondary Program, all of the
Count's projects on our priority list, and have additional funds
avail for other projects. This is vastly different from what the
Commm nwealth Transportation Board was led to believe.
help
have provided copies of this material for all of the Board
for Bob Tucker and staff members. I hope that, after YOU have
to look it over and digest it, we can discuss it at a Board
some future date.
had
meeti
and
to
use.
YOU will feel it is a start for a format that could be of
us. And, of course, staff and Board members may have
suggestions, additions, etc. to make. It is obvious that
a "DATE TABLE" which shows scheduling for every project and
tables similar to what I have presented which give an easily
tandable overview of funding of all projects, Primary, Secondary
This is merely a start on something I think could be useful
In any event, I plan to keep these tables updated for my own
we
hank YOU for your time and for your attention.
HODGE COMMENTS ON TIMING OF CATS
CTB work session November 14, 1990 - Manassas
L.
"... So
becpme sooner
p.1P)
therefore,
than we
we
are
feel
able
that the need for the Bypass will probably
to accomplish the CATS plan." (Transcript,
z,
"... we're talking about 25 to 30 years to finish the CATS plan that I
indicated to you are mostly secondary roads...... (Transcript, p.10)
3. dropping I
p. 18)
but the CATS plan. with the current funding process. which is
probably is not going to be in place for 30 to 40 ... .. (Transcript,
.. ... and with 2.6 million dollars a year, it's at least 30 years before
4. it can be completed." (Transcript, p.19)
"
'" Yes. the CATS plan is definitely not going to make it by the year
and it's definitely not going to make it by the year 2010." (Transcript,
5. 2000,
p.20)
6.
.. ... I don't
(Transcript, p.30)
see
the
CATS plan being finished in a timely fashion."
CTE meetinE. November 15 1990 - Manassas
..
7: little
because
..
B. plans
that's
... As we discussed in great detail about the CATS plan.it is very
likelihood that it will be in effect for the next 20 to 30 years ...
funding capabilities and prioritie~ have been set." (Transcript. p.43)
. . . They were initially made with the assumption that all of the CATS
could be in effect. As we discussed with you yesterday, in detail. ...
a virtual impossibility." (Transcript, p.45)
Cf. in effect."
We feel that it will be needed with a lack of the CATS plan being
(Transcript, p.50)
.. ... looking at the money, that I explained yesterday with the CATS
10 plan, and having the CATS plan in effect by 2010, ... a virtual impossibility.
. (Transcript. p.53)
CTB aeetinE March 20. 1991 - Richmond
II.
.. ... it would take an additional 18 years beyond the current six year
plan or to the year 2016 to fund the secondary projects in the CATS plan."
(Presentation to the CTB. p.8)
.. . . . questions raised regarding the funding, and may take 30 years to
12. fun~ all of the projects." (Presentation to the CTB, p.11)
I
i
,...
~
..J
CD
~
~
<C
()
a
UJ
z
~
a.
f-
UJ
>-
f-
a
z
>-
o
::::>
l-
(/)
Z
o
~
~
CI:
o
a..
(/)
z
~
I-
L:i
CI:
<C
w
...J
...J
:>
(/)
w
~
9
CI:
<C
:J:
()
In
CO
0)
T""
~ ~
~ ~ Cii
a c, t
~ ~ 0
f- c.. '"
a >= '"
~~~
UJ ~
z a.
~
a.
a ~ oq-
~ lil ~
u 6, ~
o e 0
~ Q. ;
0)::1
w CD ~
Z S; ~
~ c..
a. ~
E ~ lii
ti 5 0
UJ f- U
~
o
CI:
LL
(/)
I-
()
W
a
CI:
a..
LL
o
(/)
~
I-
~
U)
g.~Rlt::
c!slf8
lI.l
f- 0
~ z
:a
~ oq- e '
Cii ::J~
it
o ~
ill ... 5
tl ~ ~
..
~ ~
N oq- E
... &~
CO) :a
e '
::JiM
~ ~ ~
o _
<.l ...
~..
... CO) i
... &..
:a
e
::J~
Ul j III
o ~
~~
M ~
&-M
UJ
U lI.l
II: IL. ~
::Ja::J
liS IL.
~
r:. a;
N
v ~
Ilf
~
lli
III
...
(OJ
...
~
'!J
N
(I;
~ ~
N
~ 8
-.q- 'if
oq-
....
N
(OJ
III
....
(OJ
~
o
~
...
lZl
....
lZl
N
~ ~
":Ilf
~
....
N
8
N
~ ,00 ~
~ ,~il
,~ ,@,
~ .Ti
8
....
~
10
...
~
<:f
M'
III
~I
~
<:f
~
M'
Cii
...
~
<:f
8
...
ai
...
~~~~~~~&~~&~&~~~~~~~&~~~&~~~~
w >=
~lL.liia
iS08~1Il
lI.l en
>=>=>=~~:>:~>=
III co III co cc III co cc
::J::J::JlI.la.UlUla.
. .
f- f-
a a
a a
::> ::>
g !lJ ..
... .... c:
~ - 0
c;a
GJ ( (
~ c:
!!~v~~~~~~=~
8,....,.~5IlfNNC'f:!~v
(
~;~~~!~~~~~~~~~2:
o
.,.
E
o
.t::
~~-l-J~
UU~
!2 ~ z 'tl
q: lil ~ta CD
~ i ~ 0 fil
ll~~tn~
~ If ~ ~
o
'in
.,
~
f-
U
UJ
a
II:
a.
~
~ ~ ['" .
,g!,!til1[~
iJii1~~
~~EfilC:
-0-0 E1\j U
:t:tUJ ~
...J -0
~ a: .,
CD !2 cf
;(j q: c:
c....J '"
~~cf
fil en
N .:..
U
z
EE
0.0.
~ ~
<.l <.l
~ ~
o 0
-0 -0
'" '"
.. .,
~~
.<:
15 UJ UJ ~
z~~~~~
:cfcflI:lflf
I ~ @ ~
~,gcF@
~ @ d II:
~i.UJ
~ ~
~ ~
~ '
N If
If
>=~>=>=~ >=~::- ~:...~~
CO~CCCO~~CC~~~~~~~
Ul ::J::J lI.l
~ -l > > ~ w
....~tn8 ::l<(<(UJzgti_5
~'l:l"'~~~fillll+~",
q:~~~"'~~~~~g:o;
"'C.E YY!2ti~~~
~~~ ~tntna:a:.,=!2
>-~l)~~.- 2~~a~
CDN~a:(J).i~ CI: '"-:G
~~ fli~~ t~
Cli ~~
N 0
U
Cll
c:
c:
o
U
~
II:
o
If
~~
~ ~
[~lI.l
-0 -0 ,,;;
lI:r;,ld
~~If
til til
.<: ., til
QlCll
~~g
>- >- >- >- z >- >- >- >- >- >- >- z z z z z z
N M v ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~
CD
Rl ~ ;(j Z ...J
q:....~"'~~Rl~
~CD..8
~Rl~~6
<.l , a:
- :d. ....9 0
~,+a:3a:
~ <( '"
"CO. ~
~.., ~
I
~titi j~~~~
a,~II:;B. . a.~~-!il~
CIl~i~8,> 8,~* ...
:a~.9c:lij~~:a~@@)@)@)
n...~l)ofit:;::,fiocoe_
I) ~ ~'~ ~! ~ ~ g Q. ~ ~ ~
t: ~ ~i:s 5:gt: .,"'0 o!:::
.ClCl~. 1L.a:.~ ........
zGB>-(9 z(8 z z€)€ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ... S
... 8 c:
~ g ... 0
... lj
CIl~ t:
e :3 :::I [
0.. --:I J fJ)
i i e ~
o ... E I--
a:l?CIlj2
~a:eca
f-"'t:a..,
og..t:~
c 0 E ., 0
::> ~ ~ ~ E
EUlo>E
g:Oa.~8
6fg~o
il ~ i ,g'
~~,~e~
::J ::J c.. ::J ~
I 8 il il Ii!
uiff~
I~~~~
,gaoz
< ~ ~ E
II " " II g
=- >= >= )3. II
a III III III CD
~ lI.l 11. ::J t3
T
.
10/91
TABLE 2
SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - ALBEMARLE COUNTY
SUMMARY OF CURRENT 6 - YEAR PROGRAM 1990 - 1996
County Estim, Cast Allocated
CATS Priorty StatuslEAD At No, Road From / To Project Type Revised as of 90-91 In 91-92
No. No. 91-92
(&'91 ) (x $1 CXXJ) (x $1 CXXJ) (x $1 CXXJ)
1 N/A - - County - wtde Pipe In51, signs, atc, $ 600 $ 100 $50
2 N/A 625 - Hattan Ferry Operatlon 00 10 10
3 N/A - - Plant Mix Plant mix projects 1,2CO 2CO 24+150*
4 Complete 631 RloRd, @ 631/659(SPCA) Intersection 388 326
5 Complete 631 Rio Rd, @ 631/Agnese Intersection 100 82
6 Complete 654 BarrBcl<s @654/656 Intersection 'JJ7 'JJ7
7 Complete 631 Rio Rd. @ 631 /768 Intersection 563 516
B Complete 656 Georgetwn @1411/1472 Intersection 322 258
9 CompJeta 620 - Buck 151 Crk Bridge 326 326
10 5/93 (5 mo) 700 - 7001631 Intersection 400 158
11 at92 (8 mo) 654 Barracl<s WCL to G'town Major reconst to 4 lane 1,176 742 378
dD Complete 631 , 781 /700 Intersection 279 279
6 13 7/97 631 (MdwCrk P~ NCL to Rio Rd major cons!/brdg (new rd) 5,850 701
14 1 0/91 (1 2 mol 671 - Moormans RIv MIHlngton Bridge 1,488 575 Em
14 15 7/fQ (18 mo) 631 RloRd 11 03/S.700 Major recon (new align) 5,812 2.008 Be6
8 16 Comp1ete 631 Rio Rd ,3 me >>l/B50 Major reconst to 4 lane 2.226 2.226
17 CompJeta 001 - Buck Mtn Crk Bridge 350 350
18 Constructing 600 - @ S,Rtvanna RIv Bridge 2. 077 1 ,3fil 720 *
19 5/93 (6 mol 878 In Ivy 2501878 Major recon (new align) 500 444
1 21 5193 (1 yr) 743 Hydraulic Lambs/631 Major reconst to 4 lane 1,725 185
9 22 7/95 631 RloRd 743I29N Major reconst to 4 lane 3,520 248
24 Complete 810 - N of 240 Imprv sight dlst at school 112 112 18
25 11/91 (4 mol 729 - @729(250 Intersection 'JJ5 63 42
~ 2194 691 Park Park exlt/24O New road 100 85
f27 Constructlna 743 - @74:l1006 Intersection 705 644
20 ~ 7/95 (9 mol 1 B6B GnbrOrExt New road New road 1,379 123 68
~ 9/97 001 Old Ivy 001/,1 mn 250 Intersection/underpass 210 10
~ 7/95 (12 mol B49 AIrport !JEI29N Major reconstructlon 900 0
~ >00 743 Advc MUI Rtvanna RIv Bridge 1,250 0
132 >00 877 Old Ballrd @ RA Bridge Bridge BOO 0
134 >00 001 Old Ivy 250/29-250 8yps Major reconstruction BOO 0
(35 2/94 (3 mol 691 Jarmans Gp 240/684 Major recon5trustlon 1 . CXXJ 0
be > OO(most - Unpaved County-wtde Unpaved ROad Projects 7,497 70 49B
projects) - - - MIsc 18
* Revenue Sharing Fund5 Sub Total 12.813 3,203
$435,(0) State TOTAL $44,193 $15,816
$435,(0) A1be, County TOTAL - 6 CATS Project $20,312 $ 6,215
! TOTAL - w/o CATS Projects $23,881 $ 9,001
!
Funds required: non-allocated and non-CATS projects =~14,280)
I
.
10/91
TABLE 3
SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - ALBEMARLE COUNTY
NOT IN CURRENT 6-YEAR PLAN OR >1996
Revised Allocated
CATS County Route Road FromfTo Project Type 91-92 As of
No, Priority Number Name EstCost 91-92
No. (x $1 CXXJ) (x $1 CXXJ)
20 On Clp) Peyton Cmnwlth/Gmbrier New Road or Maj.Recon $200 $ 200
23 On Clp) Berkmar N of Rio Rd New Road 600 600
33 Connector Avon StJRt 20 New Road (not qualify 1,375 77
for 6-yr, funds)
37 72e 795/1 :xJ2 Spot Improvements 500 0
38 - Crozet 240/250 Connct New Road study 0
39 631 UAB to park Spot Improvements 750 0
40 700 20/29 Spot Improvements 525 0
41 631 Stagecoach NA to UAB Spot Improvements :DJ 0
42 810 @ Moormans Av Bridge Project 350 0
43 , Connector Fonta/Sunset New Road study 0
44 781 Sunset SCLjStagecoa Spot Improvements 150 0
~ 692 in N,Garden 2505/71 2 Spot Improvements 400 0
'Z7 - (MdwCrK Pky"\ N, of Rio Rd New Road study 0
47 712 @ Ammonen Br Bridge Project 100 0
48 637 @ Ivy Creek Bridge Project 215 0
49 649 Proffit @ RR Bridge Bridge Project OCO 0
50 600 @ Mechunk CrK Bridge Project 500 0
51 6'27 @ Balnger CrK Bridge Project :DJ 0
52 fEil @ Piney CrK Bridge Project 250 0
53 662 @ 662/795 Intersect Imprv 150 0
54 662 @ 662/793 Intersect Imprv 200 0
55 743 @ Jacobs Run Sight Distlmprv :DJ 0
56 , Connector Avon/5th St New Road 4,870 0
21 57 656 Georgetown &431654 Maj, Reconstruct 1,CXXJ 0
58 744 02T1 S, At 7'26 Gates 85 0
59 679 24m s.Rt 738 Fish Lgts & Gate 85 0
00 6'27 74m s,At 726 Fish Lgts & Gate 85 0
61 611 23'n s.Rt 691 Gates 85 0
6'2 642 .28m ne Rt 708 Gates 85 0
63 625 75m se At 81 2 Fish Lgts & Gate 85 0
64 1310 00m sRt 6 Gates 85 0
65 002 ,01 m sRt 612N Fish Lgts & Gate 85 0
TOTAl $14,595 $877
TOTAl - 2 CATS Project $ 1,CXXJ -
TOTAL - w/o CATS Projects $13.595 $ 877
Funds required: non-allocated and non-CATS projects =~ 12,718)
~ If
0 c c
..... ~ c
0 ~ ~
== :=
'E c c E 'E 'E
c c c 0 0 an (D
0 0 0 ..... :.= := 0 (D
== ~~ ~ == == ~ d ,...; ('I)
'E E E .qo (\I .....
I' 1'1' '-9- oan '-9- '-9- '-9- ~
. (!) ~ ajcrj ~~
~ Z '-9- '-9- ~ '-9- ~
-
Z C II II II II II II II II II /I
::)
0 Z
u ::) (/) .... ~
LL. le (/) (/)
W <<> 0 t3
-' <<> :J - () Z
0:: ~ >. c .....~ (/) W C,)
< <<> <<>$ J2 I- :e (1j
@ > () '-
:e ~ <<> - IV (J ww_ 8
w ~ 0:: ~ (J ;::::.~ w
CD )( 1-.2 -~ a >0::(')
-' (!) <<> (/) le ~ -Cl ~o.. 0:: ~<Cl/S ~
< <<>
>. le .... 0.. 0..:1:(\1 ~
0 <<> (J .. .... =~
@ <<> >. <<> ~ 0 E~ ~u(/)
-.:t I a: >'c '[ UZ Ch - C> ~
@~ I- oJ:- "'0
Q. )( 0.. W ~o ~~~
z - a I ~'-! a < =
W 0 ..... )( E ! U 8
- I 0::1--
...J ~ C le : ~ 0 a: i . @).~ c (/)
m 0 ~ I- 0.. ..... c >-:::i I Q)
<<> .. 0) .. 'il 0
~ w ~ >-a~SE =c ~~Cn CI)
a ~d
c'-9- a: 0 (J <<> ~
0:: a: 0 <.. <<>0:: 0:: o-~
== ~ 00.. C 0 zO::o
0.. 'E Zle'O~!
>- 'E I u.. oQ, Z
0:: o <<> (/) 0 0 oo::c
Lti a: I' ~~ U~IVWI- W wo..o Io-l
~ -' ~
<( ~ ~~ CD (/) C
>- j~~
c ('I) d 5 c <<> (\I 5
@ ~ (/) .- c ....... (1j
Z ..'-9-u I- ~ j .2 ~ <::)z -
0 II ~ I <<> <<<> 0:: u..o< ..0
o co.. (/) < ~
() .. c'5; i Iii .... C> 000 -
CJ 0 ~ (/) I-Ww .-
W (/):8.c$i zo::z.2 W (/)-'~ ~
en WIV(/)i'G~ _ (J ::)
i~c>(j)< ZJ2J2~ Z 00::0
;{ ~ ~ W ()~o
w<:J > (1j
> 4> C ::::t .-.- W owj
w_~ w ~ ~ 0:: wCD< C,)
a:sc> 0::0..0.. 1--'. =
o(/)a: O)an~ u.. <<z ~
0 ~zo -
w... ~
b ... u..... ... w I-oz ~
0 0 (/)
w z w
I-
a (/) :5 (/)
0 (/)
a: < w <
0.. () CD -'
.....
i
.....
ai
..,
(J
o
b
c
>
E
g
(/)
c
o
1;
(.)
~
~
~
E
~
w
l8
C>
~
'0
&
IV
..
~
-
-
I
TABLE 5
PRIMARY 6-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
COMPARSION OF 5-YEAR OVERLAP OF 90-91 FINAL AND 91 -9;2 FINAL PROJECTED AU.OCA nONS
ALBEMARLE COUNTY AlLOCATIONS VJ. CULPEPER DISTRICT AlLOCATIONS
Albemarte County
R( ute Primary FY
Projects
Alb - Improve 90-91
~ Intersection At 742 91 -9;2
EAD 11196 (6mo)
Alb - Improve honz 90-91
~ & vert alIgn - At 53 91 -9;2
EAD 7/93 (erno)
Alb - widen 6 lanes 90-91
19 NCl - RIo Rd 91 -92
EAD 7/93 (6 Mo)
Alb - wIden 6 lanes 90-91
~19 Rio Rd - S.F.RIv. 91-9;2
EAD 7/94 (2 YJ)
AJb - widen 6 lanes 90-91
~~ S.F.RIv - Arpt Rd 91 -9;2
EAD 7/96 (2 Vr)
Alb - environ. 90-91
:lip study (SVerdrup) 91 -9;2
Alb - 4 lane & Free 90-91
21~ Bridge ECl - 164 91-9;2
constructing (2 YJ)
Alb - Chvllle 90-91
~~ (Bypass All 10 91-9;2
(for P.E.& ROW)
TOTALS
Albemarte County
(8 projects)
Culpeper
Dlsbict
90-91
91 -9;2
(dlfl)
90-91
91 -9;2
(dlfl)
Estlm.
Total Cost
(x $1 0(0)
826
786
596
596
17,509
13,210
8,866
8150
10,805
1 3.224
3,600
3.602
1 2. 400
1 4,033
3000
(neW)
54,601
56,600
(+1,999)
91 -9;2
100
70
200
110
670
1,596
300
300
300
50
55
1,900
1,235
700
Projected AUocatlons (X $1 0(0)
9;2-93
93-94
94-96
96-ge
10191
TOTAL
(X $1 0(0)
3,470 5.966 6,606 6,690 11,410 34.140
4.115 4,446 6,510 7,080 8.080 30,230
(+640) (-1.520) (-~ (+390) (-3330)
lAlb; Co. FV 91-~&- '~$l'5:~andl()(:~(){l ~~eoee',.,.."...,."...' ~4;$lO) ~
'" . 'aila%,()f~Y~laJf()cattorr.., (-11.5%) .-
.. .,. ... "v.'/o~m";oeWPf()jeetCaYP~ (-20.2%)
200
100
100
200
1 00
2500
1900
4000
2745
2960
1430
3230
1436
1066
300
1,1.00
900
2.366
2. 750
1770
1666
400
200
1,405
235
1,366
1,700
6,410
4,990
1,800
1,345
1 .830
600
600
1 .100
1 5,362 15,669 15,462 16,283 17,047
13.278 15.380 15.860 15,763 16,023
(-2.084) (-289) (+408) (-620) (-1,024)
Culpep-.Dlst FY 9t :-eQ, &~9t:.a: Vi, allOtatlm 'differenCe,'.. ,
" ........>aSa:.%()fFY~91.3A~aflocf . .
79,813
76.304
:+3;500) ~
( -4.4%) ~
-
.....-:--:. ~....
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. ETHTEL
COMMI SIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND. 23219
March 25, 1991
Route 29 Corridor
City of Charlottesville
Albemarle County
Mr. Robert Humphries
109 Falcon Drive
Charlottesville, Virginia
Dear Mr. Humphries:
find attached
This
informa ion was used n the resentation made b Mr. Hod e to the
Commonwealth Transportation Board work session on March 20, 1991. Also
included is a copy of thee-Analysis of Presentatioiko the Commonwealth
Transportation board by George R. St.John.
I hope this information will be of assistance to you and if you
have additional questions we will try to respond to them as best we can.
Thank you for your continued interest in this important transportation
matter.
PGN/mld
Mr. John G. Milliken
Mr. Ray D. Pethtel
Mr. E. C. Cochran, Jr.
State Location & Design Engineer
/..J....~:
3(28/'71
~cl,le ~ ;
'311.7/.,/
_..r-
(
.fVZ~ ?/,Za/91
-+ ~6 ""
VlJO'-
HIGHWAY PROJECTS RECOMMENDED IN THE CATS PLAN
(ASSUMED IN 2010 HIGHWAY NETWORK~ ---- ----
LOCATION
/_ HYDRAULIC ROAD
z. McINTIRE ROAD
3 McINTIRE ROAD
4; RTE. 29 NORTH
5, RTE.250 BYPASS
b. 9TH.ST. REALIGN
f. RIO ROAD
8. RIO ROAD
'Y. ROUTE 250 E.
10. E. HIGH ST.
II. ROUTE 250 W.
12_ ROUTE 250 W.
t 3. IVY ROAD
(f. ROUTE 631
FROM
TO
COST
(IN MILLIONS)
ROUTE 657 ROUTE 631 1.4
PRESTON AVE. RTE. 250 BY-PASS 5.5
RTE. 250 BYPASS ROUTE 631 5.3
RTE. 250 BYPASS SOUTH FORK 28.3
RIVIANA RIVER
ST.CLAIR AVE.
E. HIGH ST.
3.8
6.9
CHERRY AVE
MAIN STREET
ROUTE 29
McINTIRE RD. EXT. 1.6
ROUTE 743
ROUTE 29 2.3
E. HIGH ST.
ROUTE 20 1.6
ROUTE 250 BYPASS 1.4
ROUTE 29/250 BP.
9TH. STREET
ROUTE 677
4.6
ROUTE 677
ROUTE 637
EMMETT STREET ROUTE 29/250 BP.
4.1
11.1
O.56MI.N.RTE 706
ROUTE 1103
i5. ROUTE 250 ROUTE 20 1-64 10.9
lb. RIDGE STREET WEST MAIN ST. CHERRY STREET 1.9
/7. GREENBRIER DRIVE WHITEWOOD ST. HYDRAULIC ROAD 0.8
RIO ROAD/
I~ ROUTE 250 CONN. RIO ROAD ROUTE 250 8.2
/1'. MADISON AVE. EXT. MADISON AVE.
20. GEOREGTOWN ROAD
:Lt. FONTAINE AVENUE
PRESTON AVENUE
0.2
HYDRAULIC ROAD BARRACKS ROAD
1.9
~~. ROUTE 637 ROUTE 250
JEFFERSON PARK ROUTE 29/250 BP. 1.1
1-64 2.3
ROUTE 29 N. 17.1
~
~3. McINTIRE RD.EXT. RIO ROAD
Edward H. Bar , Jr
Samuei Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296,5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
!::"orresl H. Ma.rshall. Jr
SC()!t~~II1,'
DavId P Bowe man
CharJol!esvilk
ChC1rl~S S Martl!l
HI\"('lnT:<l
Charlotte Y H rnphns
.Jack Jouett
V,)alter F Perfcns
White Hal!
-~ .
Febr~ary' 16, 1993
M . Hunter Craig
C aig Builders of Albemarle, Inc. ( \
P.O. Box 6156 ,
C arlottesville, VA 22906
D
Mr. Craig:
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Albemarle County Board
Supervisors adopted the attached resolution requesting
dustrial Access Funds from the Department of Transportation to
nstruct an industrial access road in Mill Creek Industrial Park.
addition the Board instructed the County Attorney to obtain the
cessary surety from Mill Creek Land Trust to guarantee that the
ard will not involve local funds in this project should the
ard's bond to the state be forfeited at the end of the three-year
riod. All correspondence concerning the guarantee will be
rthcoming from the County Attorney's office.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel
to contact this office at 296-5843.
E
Sincerely,
~ I '/r
- ~~ [/1) ( (<ALu\
lla w. Carey I
Clerk 0"
tachment
c Richard Huff, III
George st. John
,
At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of County Supervi-
so s of Albemarle County, Virginia, held on February
mo ion by Mr. Martin, seconded by Mrs. Humphris,
re olution was adopted by a vote of six to zero:
3 ,
the
1993, on a
following
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mill Creek Land Tru$t has acquired property located in
th County of Albemarle for the purp~seof industrial development; and
WHEREAS, this property is expected to be the site of new private
ca ital investment in land, building and manufacturing equipment which
wi 1 provide substantial employment; and
WHEREAS, the subject property h~s~~b access to a public street or
hi hway and will require the construction of a new roadway to connect
wi h the Southern Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle hereby guarantees that the
essary right-of-way for this new roadway and utility relocations or
ustments, if necessary, will be provided at no cost to the Virginia
artment of Transportation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of
nty Supervisors hereby requests that the Commonwealth Transporta-
n Board provide Industrial Access Road funding to provide an
quate road to this property; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Albemarle Board of County
ervisors hereby agrees to provide a surety or bond acceptable to
payable to the Virginia Department of Transportation in the full
unt of the cost of the road; this surety shall be exercised by the
artment of Transportation in the event that sufficient qualifying
ital investment does not occur on Tax Map 76M(1) Parcels 11, 12,
17, 18 and 20 within three years of the Commonwealth Transporta-
n Board's allocation of funds pursuant to this request.
AND FURTHER RESOLVED that the Albemarle Board of County Supervi-
s hereby agrees that the new roadway so constructed will be added
and become a part of the State Secondary System.
~~~~~~~~
Chairman
E COpy TESTE:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
POLICY GOVERNING REQUESTS FOR USE OF
INDUSTRIAL ACCESS FUNDS FROM THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
TO CONSTRUCT AN INDUSTRIAL ACCESS ROAD
It shall be the policy of the Board of Supervisors of Albe-
rn rle County, Virginia, to handle developers' requests for use of
I dustrial Access Funds from the Commonwealth of Virginia, to
c nstruct an Industrial Access Road, on a first-come, first-serve
b sis, or in the event that more than one request is received
c ncurrently funds to be distributed proportionately, for available
f nding in anyone fiscal year using the following criteria:
1. All property adjoining a proposed industrial access road
shall be currently zoned for industrial uses that will
qualify under the state's Industrial Access Program.
2. All costs and potential obligations of the program shall
be borne by any applicant such that no local funds are in
any way involved in any such project.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
w iting, is a true, correct copy of a policy unanimously adopted by
t e Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
r gular meeting held on February 3, 1993.
l::~B~al~L~f~~tsuperVisors
c:~ _
I - ~/c;)_ C/ ,;,
.RS.L~_Y52.~.>---" ..",
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STAFF C
Messrs.
Funds
AGENDA DATE:
February 3, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
93.0d-O~,$?
ACTION:~
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWED BY:
Yes~
/WI
BACKGRO
Section 33.1-221, of the Code of Virginia, as amended provides for a program commonly known
as the Industrial Access Fund Program. The purpose of this program is to provide state
funding for the purpose of the construction of roads to provide adequate access for sites on
which ew or substantially expanding manufacturing, processing or other qualifying
establi hments will be built.
tatives of Mill Creek Land Trust have made a request to the County to consider a
for Industrial Access Funds to construct Stony Ridge Road in the Mill Creek
al Park. This park is presently zoned for industry and being actively marketed by
its own r for industrial uses. The attached request asks that the County apply to the state
for a 'bonded project" whereby the Board will guarantee to the state that qualifying
industr es will locate along this new road within a three year period sufficient to cover
state p rticipation in the road. Mill Creek Land Trust will, in turn, provide surety to the
County or this guarantee to be made such that no County funds will be at risk by the Board's
action hich is being requested.
DISCUSS ON:
There a e presently several companies which have been negotiating with Mill Creek Land Trust
to loca e on sites within Mill Creek Industrial Park. A requirement of many industries is
that th ir new facility be located on a state maintained road within an industrial park. The
State's Industrial Access Fund program allows for two methods whereby roads can be
constru ted in industrial parks using state funds. The first method is used when an industry
is read to sign a letter of commitment, come to a locality and the road is generally
constru ted to serve the property line of that industry. The second method involves
specula ive industrial sites where a commitment is made to locate enough qualified investment
in the p rk within a three year period to meet the requirements of the state for the program.
The lat er is being requested at this time by the owners of Mill Creek Industrial Park in
order t continue development of the industrial park at Mill Creek. If the Board
partici ates in this bonded project, the state will put up the majority cost of the road and
provide for a three year period to place qualifying industries on the remaining sites which
abut th new road. In the event sufficient qualifying industries are not located within the
time pe iod, Mill Creek Land Trust understands that they will be responsible for the re-
payment of any difference to the Virginia Department of Transportation. Participation in
this pro'ect will require that the County Engineering Department administer the contract for
the con truction of this road much as was done on the Walnut Creek Recreational Access
project.
One of he policy issues involved in this request is how to handle other requests from
develop rs who may seek the same assistance from the State in building roads into other
speculative industrial parks. It is clear that this process will enhance the inventory of
~
AGENDA T TLE:
Industri~l Access Funds
February 3, 1993
Page 2
existing parks and our ability to show sites that are "ready to go." The Industrial Access
Program ~imits the amount of funding given to a locality in anyone year to $300,000 in
unmatche~ funds and another $150,000 to be matched dollar for dollar by either the County or
a developer. Funding is established on a fiscal year basis.
DCO ATION:
Staff rec ommends that, if the Board is interested in proceeding with the request made by Mill
Creek Land Trust, the attached resolution be adopted and that the County Attorney be
instruct~d to obtain the necessary surety from Mill Creek Land Trust to guarantee that the
Board wi 1 not involve local funds in this project should the Board's bond to the state be
forfeite~ at the end of the three-year period. Staff further recommends that as a policy
guidelin~, other requests be handled on a first-come, first-serve basis for available funding
in any o~e fiscal year using the following criteria:
(1) Al property adjoining a proposed industrial access road shall be currently zoned for
inc ustrial uses that will qualify under the state's industrial access program.
(2) Al costs and potential obligations of the program shall be borne by any applicant such
th t no local funds are in any way involved in any such project.
93.008
I
At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Albemarle County Board
o Supervisors held on February 3, 1993, on a motion by
, seconded by , the
fcnllowing resolution was adopted by a vote of to
WHEREAS, Mill Creek Land Trust has acquired property located
il the County of Albemarle for the purpose of industrial
dEvelopment; and
WHEREAS, this property is expected to be the site of new
p ivate capital investment in land, building, and manufacturing
ecuipment which will provide substantial employment; and
WHEREAS, the subject property has no access to a public street
01 highway and will require the construction of a new roadway to
ccnnect with Southern Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle hereby guarantees that the
necessary right of way for this new roadway and utility relocations
OI adjustments, if necessary, will be provided at no cost to the
Virginia Department of Transportation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The Albemarle County
Beard of Supervisors hereby requests that the Commonwealth
Transportation Board provide Industrial Access Road funding to
provide an adequate road to this property; and
I
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: The Albemarle County Board of
Subervisors hereby agrees to provide a surety or bond, acceptable
to and payable to the Virginia Department of Transportation, in the
fu 1 amount of the cost ~f,t4e road; this surety shall be exercised
--,l'\
by the Department of Transportation in the event that sufficient
qulilifying capital investment; does not occur on Tax Map 76M(1)
pal--cels 11, 12, 16, 17, 18 and 20 within three years of the
Colnmonwealth Transportation Board's allocation of funds pursuant to
th's request.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THA~:. The Albemarle County Board of
Subervisors hereby agrees that the new roadway so constructed will
be added to and become a part of the State Secondary System.
(S~AL)
A COpy TESTE:
(Chairman)
-------------------------------------------
RE~,II/dbm
93 002
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
2A
2B
MILL C EEK INDUSTRIAL PAR K
PARe LS II THRU 24
D8'1I0'2'"pt 724
14
IJ
WILLOUGHBY
PLATS 08.464 Pg.45
O.B. 476 Pgs.1O a 17
100
SCALE ... 'U T
100 ...
000
000
SCOTTSVILLE DISTRICT
SECTION 76M{J)
CR IG BUILDERS
OF ALBEMARLE, INC.
anuary 8, 1993
~ )-\' ~
r. Richard Huff
lbemarle County
01 McIntire Road
harlottesville, Va. 22901
VIA HAND DELIVERY
RE: Mill Creek Industrial Park - Industrial
Access Funds
ear Mr Huff:
Craig Builders of Albemarle hereby requests that the Albemarle
ounty Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution to request
ndustrial Access Funds from the Commonwealth Transportation Board
or Stoney Ridge Road located in the Mill Creek Industrial Park.
Should the Commonwealth Transportation Board provide
ndustrial Access Funds under acceptable terms, Craig Builders of
lbemarle agrees to provide the necessary bonding for Stoney Ridge
oad. Furthermore, Craig Builders of Albemarle understands that
lbemarle County may act to facilitate the receipt of the
ndustrial Access Funds.
If you have any questions or need any additional information,
lease call me at 973-3362.
Thank you.
incerely,
:::~:7
CC!._Jf~!TY Or: !\L~3=-riijj\~~~.i:
]'
~'"
JAN 1 1 lqa~
/ .~~
L '~,
E>'. .L+ U I '. " ',_. i",~ ~ ;:-: :1::
38 Rio Road · Post Office Box 6156 . Charlottesville, Virginia 22906 . (804) 973-3362
II
LX
)
epartment of Transportation in that locality. In other towns, the request by a Town
ouncil should be concurred in by a separate resolution of the County Board of Supervisors.
lS
j,
IS
Allocations for road construction are limited to one-tenth of the qualifying capital
nvestment; where the amount ofsu-,~h investment is not at least ten times the estimated cost
f road construction, the reso~tlon should state that the locality will assure the provision
f the construction funds not justified by the capital investment.
a
For new roads, the resolution(s)'should state that right of way and utility relocation
ill be provided at no cost to Industrial Access funds, and that the road will be accepted
nto the appropriate road system for maintenance. See page 13, Appendix II for a suggested
esolution.
e
g
2.
Bonded Projects (where no industry is under contract to build):
Where a county, city, or town desires to have an industrial access road constructed
n anticipation of a commitment by a ~anufacturing, processing or other qualifying
stablishment to locate, such a request may be made as above. However, it will be
ecessary that the governing body guarantee to the Board that a bond or other acceptable
urety will be provided to cover the cost of the road which is not yet justified by qualifying
ndustrial investment. For new roads, the resolution should assure that right of way and
tility relocation will be provided at no cost to the Department.
k
It is also necessary that the resolution of the governing body state that, should no
stablishment acceptable to the Board be constructed within the time limit of the bond, such
ond shall be forfeited. If only partial qualifying investment occurs on appropriate site(s)
'thin the time limit of the bond, proportional credit against the bond will be granted for
hat partial investment. The time limit shall be three years from the date of allocation by
he Board. See page 15, Appendix III for a suggested resolution.
d
~,
o
If
S
Frequently in the development of an industrial park, road costs will exceed one-tenth
he amount of qualifying capital investment of the first industry. In such circumstances, it
s possible to combine a Regular Project and a Bonded Project, in order to provide for both
resent and prospective industries. These are somewhat complicated, and are not easily
xplained in advance. The responsible Resident Engineer will assist a local government in
he specific procedures to be followed in such an instance.
C. Role of the Resident Engineer
y
r
r
The responsible Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation will
sist the county, city, or town in preparing a resolution requesting funding, in preparing
ketches and cost estimates for requested road imp'ro'VeIbents, and in assembling a file with
i ormation necessary for review by other offices of the Department of Transportation and
5
.'
.
;
.. -
DATE , " /)
'- .
,
" . ~ i
AGENDA ITEM NO. ... '. -..-.,
,
, ,
. '. '--.
, I :
l , ._, : f 7
'J -
,. '. ~
AGENDA ITEM NAME j.\. ,. '- "
I. \ ( - , , I .' L i -. I J
..
, 'I ~
DEFERRED UNTIL I , 1-'-' . -
-" f -,
, .
Form.3
7/25/86
.
. .
, ".-' ,
DATE I /,'.',
I -
, ..
I
l\GENDA ITEM NO. \, 1/ ,
/ , , j , ,..o-c;
-7f!'~' ~ /) .. ~
L f! '/i -
i !
l\GENDA ITEM NAME --, l -'~~-"'-..' f'; ., 1
I )(;()(') ~ - (I. if irt"yJ 1_ 4__"
" ( , \ "- '
tt,. ~ "-., '\ - , 1 . I i )
DEFERRED UNTIL f ~1 , ( 11 't' I., I i J
! \ ( '-,--- , , / , !\.....
~ - i ;,'/-:
,
Form. 3
7/25/86
,
..'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902,4596
(804) 296.5823
onnie R. or Catherine L. Dunn
. O. Box 231
ree Union, VA 22940
SP-92-33 Donnie and Catherine Dunn
ZMA-92-06 Donnie and Catherine Dunn
Tax Map 7, Parcels 37 and 38
Mr. & Mrs. Dunn:
e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on
nuary 13, 1993 deferred the above-noted petition to its
bruary 3, 1993 meeti'ng. These petitions were deferred in order
allow staff time to report on how long it will take to get the
formation requested by the Board and who will be providing the
formation, i.e. consultant, applicant or staff.
you should have any questions or comments regarding the above-
ted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
S ncerely,
ty Development
C/jcw
.~ Carey
Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
y
1
,
-'
Edward H H In. ,Jr
Samuei Mil er
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 2965843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scotlsville
David P _ Bo erman
Charlottesv lIe
Charles S. Martin
Rlvanna
Charlotte Y 1umphns
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
February 5, 1993
D . Henry o. Hollimon, Jr., Chairman
S ate Water Control Board
T C. Walker Elementary School
R ute 4, Box 2235
G oucester, VA 23061
D ar Dr. Hollimon:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on
F bruary 3, 1993, endorsed the petition of Citizens for Albemarle
t designate the Moormans River in Albemarle County, from its
h adwaters in the Shenandoah National Park, including its North and
S uth Forks, to its confluence with the Mechum River near White
H 11, as an exceptional water. Not only has the Board of Supervi-
s rs designated the Moormans River as a Scenic River under the
C unty's Zoning Ordinance, but this river is also a Virginia Scenic
Rver. This appears to be the next step in protecting this excep-
t onal river.
Thank you for your consideration of this issue.
Sincerely,
/;-V~
~fd P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B:ec
c Members of the State Water Control Board
Doneva A. Dalton
Deborah M. Wassenaar
*
Printed on recycled paper
._.;.'--~--,,---
.
,
~
STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD MEMBERS
,#
Mr. W. Bidgood Wall, Jr.
Rt. 1, Box 26-5
Rice, Virginia 23966
Mr. Patrick L. standing
P. O. Box 198
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23458
..
Mr. Robert C. Wininger
Route 3, Box 331
Gate City, Virginia 24251
Dr. Henry o. Hollimon, Jr., Chairman
T. C. Walker Elementary School
Rt. 4. Box .2235
Gloucester, Virginia 23061
Dr. Wendell H. Butler, Vice-Chairman
P. O. Box 6236
Roanoke, Virginia 24017-0236
Dr. Delores Z. Pretlow
1404 Antrim AVe.
Richmond, Virginia 23230
Ms. Doneva A. Dalton
State Water Control Board
P.O. Box 11143
Richmond, VA 23230-1143
- .
.-:-)
!),PL.C:./r?J '~/3// ~
RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY
-<;.'\tf~ ~{:;:;;;:-,.
I' ,,~/- <~,!' ,
1// ~ ,,~
,f/ . \~
'-~
\~~~I!:I"t~'I\\\"~'
- -.--
POBOX'8 . eI-lARI.-OTTE5VILLE. VIRCINIA 22902-001e . (804) 977'2S70
February 2. 1993
r. Wayne Cilimberg
irector of Planning and Community Development
lbcmarlc County
01 McIntire Road
harloltesville, V A 22902
ear Mr. Cilimbcrg:
ivanna Water and Sewer Authority staff have reviewed the request to designate Moormans
ivcr as an exceptional water under provisions of current State Water Control Board
egulations and do nOt take exception to such designation.
Sincerely,
...
8~~~-~-
Georg~6;1 Williams
Executive Director
KP/ GW/sg
nclosure
$I!:AVING C"'ARL-OTTI!;~VILt..1::: Eli: ALBEMARL..I!: eOUN'rY
-:f)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
David Hirschman,
Water Resources Manag~~~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Mary Joy Scala
February 1, 1993
CLARIFICA TION OF ISSUES PERTAINING TO "EXCEPTIONAL
WATERS"DESIGNATION FOR THE MOORMANS RIVER
T e main concern expressed by Engineering Staff about this designation is as follows:
Because designation would not allow any new point source discharges to the river,
would this designation effect attempts in the future the improve water quality through
the construction of agricultural BMPs, stormwater facilities, construction site runoff
detention, and other related facilities?
larification to this issue has been provided by Tom Mizell and Dwight Sours of the Virginia
ater Control Board in Bridgewater, Virginia, and the document, "Questions and Answers
o Implementation of Tier III of the Federal Antidegradation Policy: Protection of
utstanding National Resource Waters" (EPA Region IV, April 20, 1989). The state policy
e coded in VR 680-21-01.3.C. reflects closely national policy as outlined in this document.
he above question is clarified as follows:
Future agricultural BMPs would not be affected by the designation. The only permit
that could be activated for agricultural operations is a Virginia Pollution Abatement
(VP A) permit for liquid manure storage facilities that serve operations with over 300
animals or 200 dairy cows. VPA permits would be allowed and even encouraged
with the designation. The EPA document explains: "The provisions of the Clean
Water Act clearly intend that BMPs be developed and approved under Section 205(j),
303(e), and 319 and be aggressively implemented by the States" (p. 3).
Stormwater and related water quality detention facilities could very likely require
VPDES permits. New permits are generally not allowed for discharges into waters
designated as "exceptional." However, the EP A document points out that "activities
intended to enhance water quality or improve the aquatic environment" could be
allowed in designated basins (p. 3). According to the document, these activities could
.
.t j-_-_i .. ,_, .~
' >-< 'Vii T8'TER C'OI~TRbL' BORRD/OERS
t-' _ ...-1 ~
Dee 22,92 17:06 No.OOl p.oa
, .
,
.,
, .
p'opulations of fish; :~quatio" ,1 ife " '.an<1 :w11dlit..e %nay..
reasonably be oxpected'to ocelJr~ A,sa~.isfaot~ry
showinq ~ade in conformance with Section 31~la) of
the Cl$an W~ter Act shall be,aee~ed 'as eo~pl anoe
with the requirements of this paragraph.,,~ ".' ~
. , .
Notwithstanding the above, no new or expanded ~ixin9
zone shall:
Be al in waters listed in
6S0"'21-01.3.C.3;
.'
.
b. Be al1owe~ in waters defined in VR6S0-21.01.3.S
for new or increased discharges unless the
requirements outlined in VR6S0.21~Ol,3.B are
satisfied.
7. All mixing zones shall be implemented in acccrdenee
~ith the previsions of subsections A and B 1Peneral
Standard) a.bove.
.
.'
(t)
, .
"
6.
, , .
VR6S -21-Q1.3 Ant!degr~datlon POlicy
EXlstin9 !nstream ~eter uses ~nd the' level of ~ater
quality necessary to prot~ct the existing uses shall, be
~ainta1ne~ and protected. _ '~
' .
s. W~ters whose extst!ni quality is better than the"'
established standards as of the date on Which such I.
standards beoo~e effective will be rnainta1ne~ ~t the.
exi5tin9 quality, prov1de4 that the Soard has the power
to authorize any prQ~ect or developroen~, which would
constitute ~ new or an increase~ loadinq of pollutants
to high quality water, when it has been affirmatively
demonstrated that a change is necessary to prov!d, ,
!mpo~tant eoono~io'or soo1al development in the area i~
which the waters are located. Present and anticipated
use of such WAters will be preserved and p~otected.
.
1. A new or increased dIscharge is defined as a newly
construoted facility or an existing fac11ity ~hieh .
requests 4 significant increase in its loading of
' on~ or ~ore of the constituents listed in
VR680-21-01.14,S.
In considering Whether a Possible $19n1f!cant'ch~nge
in w~ter qU~11ty is necessary to provide important
economio O~ Goo1al development, the aoa~d will
provide not!ce an~ opportunity tor a publio h$6r!ng.
so th~t:1nterested persons w111 have an opportunity
to p~eSGnt.!nfor~at!on and the Board will satisfy
the rGquirement (It interg-overnrnental coordination as .
part of the Common~ealth's Continuing Plann1nq ,
Process. , . '
,
;
" ,
,
C.")
'. .,
!
I.
.
2.
.
I
1
I
.
Water Qua11ty St~nderds - 5/20/92
"-' H j"1 --..:.:..: . --- ':..::~ '-"-' --'. .....-7 _J..:, .... ~ I hi, 1tI-, -i,j~I\ \J
Dee 22.92 17:07 No.OOl P.OS
i-' _ ~.-\~..:.:.a
3. ,', UPl:>n a' f~nd1nCjJthat~ suchi,~p.h~n90 is, jus~~;f,~~b~e, 'the
change nevertheless, must not result in vlo1ationof
those water quality characteristi~s necessary to
~ttain the water quality., goals, in V:R6S0-21-01.2.A of
protection and propagation.of, fish, shellfish, and ~
wildlife,' and recreation in and on the weter. ( J
,Further,'l! a change is considered justifiable, it .
must not result in any Significant loss of .
marketability or recreational use of fiSh, shellfish
or other marine reso~rces, and all practical
~easures should be taken'to eliminate or minimize
tho impact on water quality.
4. When deqradation or lower water quality is allowed,
tne Board shall aSSUre that there shall be achieved
the tiighast statutory and regulatory requirements
~pplieable to ~ll n~w and existinq point sources to
the water body end all cost~Qffective and reasonable
beSt rnanagement practices for nonpoint ~ource
control which ar.e under the ~urisdict!on of the'
~oard. .
s. Anl dete~minations concerning thermal diseharg&
~1mitation$ madQunder Section 316(a) of the Clean
Water Act will be considered to be in compliance
with ~he antideqradation pol1cy~
Surface waters" or portions thereot, which provide
exceptional environmental settings and exceptional
aquatlo comm~n1t1es or exceptional recreational
opportunities ~ay be desi9nated an~ protected as
describe~ in VRSSO-21-01.3.C.l, 2 and 3.
().
1. Des19nation Procedu~es
OQsi9n~tlon~ shall bQ ~~opted in accordance with
the provisions of the Admlni$t~atlve Process Act
ana the Board's PUblic partioipation GUidelines.
As part of the process, the Soard Shall, when
consIdering r$9ulatory action to designate any
waters under this seotion, take all rea~onAbl.
steps to notify potentially impaoted parties,
inCluding. local 9overhrnents, of the Soard's
intent an~ the estlrnate~ impacts ot ~ny possible
.. designation. .
~.. I.mpl~n\etltat!on Procedures
l!l.
.' r/. ~.' . I I '. .
The quality ~f waters desiqnated in VR ", ' ,
6aO-21-01.3~C.3 shall be maintain~~ and.
. protected to prevent permanent orllonq-~erm
. delj1radation Ot' 1xnpa irment.
I . 'f.' ~'.
.
.
.
Water Quality stanQ~rds - 5/20/92
PAge 8 of 151
I
- '-~ '~. Io-'~ l. _ ---'---I J_ ~",:"l _ ~=. t~.
__I t--t ~-41 .-- ufi ~ '- I' .-' 't"".:~ I . Ii' \W... J.) l..J n I\, J",J f l..':.... I' o,J
1 '
lJt::1.. "",;:',I'" J.I .vr
l'iU I VV.\.
r' ... '-- ~ t..
r . VI,)
, b.
I
No n~w, additional, o~ increase~ di~charge of
sewagef 1n~ustrial was~es or, other pollu~ion
into waters de$i9nat~d in VR 6ao-21~Ol.J.C.3
shall be allowe~.
~)
Nonper~itted activities causinq temporAry
$ourC::es, of po'llution, which a.re under the
juri~d!ction of the Board, may be allowed'in
waters designated in VR S60-21.01l3.C.3 even it
de9r~aation may be expected to temporarily occur.
as long as efter a rnirtimal period ot tima the
waters are ret~rned ~r rest~~ed to conditions
equal to or'better than those existin9 just
Pti~r to the temporary source of pollution.
3. Reserved for Future Designations of waters defined
in VR 6S0-21-01.3.C
c.
l.-.-----.
VR680"'21-01.4
St~ndards Applicatio~: Stream Flow
A. Stream Flow
B.
1. Stream Standards for protection trom aoute effects
on aquatic life sh~ll apply wheneve~ flows ere equal
to, or 9reater than, the lOWest flow which, on a
statistie~l basis, would occur for a. l-day-peilod
once every 10 years.
2. stream Standards for protection t(om chronic effects'
on aquatic life and applicable standards in
VRSSO-21-01.5 shall ~pply whenever flows are equal
to, or greater than, tha lowest flow Which, on' a
statistical basis, woul~ ooeur for a
7-oonsecutive-day period onca every 10 years.
3. stream Stand~rds for protection of human health' from
carcino9~nic effects (as shown in VRS80-21.01.14.B)
shall apply whenever flows are equel to, or 9reater
than, the harmonic mean flow t. I I
4. Stream Standa~ds for protection of 'human health from
non-earcinogen1c effects (AS shown in - .
VR6S0-2L-Ol.14.!) shall apply ~henever f,lows.are
f:qual to, or' greater than, the lowest flow Which, ,on.
.4 statistical bas!., would oocur for a .
3o-consecut1ve-day period once ev~ry 5 years.
The flows listed above in VR680.21-04.A.l and 2 are used
to determina compliance with the water quality stand~rds
unless other ~ethods which are ~tatistically valid are
e~ployed ~h~ch,can be shown to protect aquatic
orqanisrns. . '
. , .
I
i
r
"
Water QU~lity stand~~d~ - 5/20/92
1'0ge '9 of 151
:
CLARIFICATION OF ISSUES PERTAINING TO "EXCEPTIONAL WATERS II
DESIGNATION FOR THE MOORMANS RIVER
Th~ main concern expressed by Engineering Staff about this designation is as follows:
Because designation would not allow any new point source discharges to the river,
would this designation effect attempts in the future the improve water quality through
the construction of agricultural BMPs, stormwater facilities, construction site runoff
detention, and other related facilities?
Cl Uification to this issue has been provided by Tom Mizell and Dwight Sours of the Virginia
W ter Control Board in Bridgewater, Virginia, and the document, "Questions and Answers
on Implementation of Tier III of the Federal Antidegradation Policy: Protection of
Ot:tstanding National Resource Waters" (EPA Region IV, April 20, 1989). The state policy
enloded in VR 680-21-01.3.C. reflects closely national policy as outlined in this document.
Th~ above question is clarified as follows:
· Future agricultural BMPs would not be affected by the designation. The only permit
that could be activated for agricultural operations is a Virginia Pollution Abatement
(VP A) permit for liquid manure storage facilities that serve operations with over 300
animals or 200 dairy cows. VP A permits would be allowed and even encouraged
with the designation. The EP A document explains: "The provisions of the Clean
Water Act clearly intend that BMPs be developed and approved under Section 2050),
303(e), and 319 and be aggressively implemented by the States" (p. 3).
· Stormwater and related water quality detention facilities could very likely require
VPDES permits. New permits are generally not allowed for discharges into waters
designated as "exceptional." However, the EPA document points out that "activities
intended to enhance water quality or improve the aquatic environment" could be
allowed in designated basins (p. 3). According to the document, these activities could
include "water conveyance structures to restore natural water quality or habitat in an
impacted area, the diversion and/or treatment of polluted waters. . ., and the removal
of existing pollution sources" (p. 3). The document also provides that "an exception
to prohibition of fill activities can be made for projects that are proposed for the
purpose of enhancing water quality" (p. 4). In addition, discharges into tributary
streams are allowed. These provisions certainly can be interpreted to allow
storm water facilities or any other activity intended to improve water quality. The
state's policy should reflect this national policy.
In conclusion, designation of the Moormans River as "exceptional" should provide an extra
Ie, el of resource protection without jeopardizing future county or private efforts to improve
water quality through structural or non-structural methods. This type of protection would
en ~ance existing county measures (Runoff Control Ordinance, Water Resources Protection
Ar~s Ordinance, Scenic Streams Overlay), and would be the first measure of protection
ac Iually tied to measurable water quality standards. Endorsement by the Albemarle County
,
B< ard of Supervisors would constitute one input into the Virginia Water Control Board's
de~ision-making process. Public hearings would be held in the future by the Water Control
Be ard if designation were to be pursued.
r'"
l..
h2,y- 9c:J
.. .,~~~:i!:~'y I
r1Er ORANDUM
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
TO
H:
E:
RE
Vi
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
V. Wayne Cilimbergr Director of Planning ,1,\ I~
and COlnmunity Development ULtJ
January 29, 1993
Cowments on Petition To Designate The Moormants River
As A Exceptional Water
Water Control Board Re ulations:
ached is a copy of VR 680-21-01.3.C which is a recently
pted section of the Virginia Water Control Board Surface Water
ndards. The new standards for "exceptional water" were
roved in March, 1992, effective May 20, 1992, in order to
ply with the federal anti-degradation regulation, which
lements the Clean Water Act. There was an anti-degradation
icy in the surface water standards previously, which on its
e appeared to comply with the federal regulations, but
ually did not. Therefore, the new regulation was adopted last
rehensive Plan and Zonin :
location of the Moorman's River is entirely within the Rural
All adjacent properties are zoned Rural Areas. Most of
North Fork and South Fork lie within the Shenandoah National
k.
Moorman's River is within the South Fork Rivanna River
ervoir watershed area, which area is subject to the Runoff
trol Ordinance. The Moorman's River, North Fork and South
k are perennial streams, subject to the Water Resource
tection Area Ordinance. The North Fork and South Fork are
ignated natural trout streams by the Virginia Water Control
rd.
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Pa~e 2
Jah.uary 29, 1993
Moprman's River is designated both a County Scenic Stream and a
vi ginia Scenic River from the Sugar Hollow Reservoir to the
Me~hums River. In addition to the conservation easements
re erenced in the petition, there are two agricultural/forestal
di~tricts which serve to protect the Moorman's River watershed:
Su~ar Hollow (3,280 acres) and Moorman's River (10, 922 acres).
Th~ Open Space Plan designates the Moorman's River and North Fork
as Major Stream Valleys.
Ef ect of Desianation:
1. The quality of waters shall be maintained and protected to
prevent permanent or long-term degradation or impairment.
(680-21-0l.3.C.2.a.)
2. No new, additional, or increased discharge of sewage,
industrial wastes or other pollution shall be allowed.
(680-2l-0l.3.C.2.b)
3. Non-permitted activities causing temporary sources of
pollution, which are under the jurisdiction of the Board,
may be allowed even if degradation may be expected to
temporarily occur as long as after a minimal period of time
the waters are returned or restored to conditions equal to
or better than those existing just prior to the temporary
source of pollution. (680-2l-0l.3.C.2.c.)
4. No new or expanded mixing zones shall be allowed.
(680-2l-01.2.C.6.a.)
Co elusions:
ThEre are approximately fifty stream nominations pending across
thE state for this type of designation. Because the designation
is new, there have been no designations to date.
ThE major effect of designation is that no new discharges (which
wOlld require a VPDES permit) are allowed. Rob Bodkin at the
Vi ginia Water Control Board Bridgewater Office stated that there
arE currently no VPDES permits on the Moorman's River. (See
En< ineering memo for clarification regarding sedimentation ponds
an< agricultural BMPs.)
ThE designation would have no effect on water withdrawals.
Gregory at the Virginia Water Control Board Richmond office
thct a reservoir without a water treatment plant is not a
prcblem. (Discharges from a water treatment plant would not
pelmitted.) She qualified that construction of a new intake
Jean
said
be
Alpemarle County Board of Supervisors
Pa~e 3
Ja~uary 29, 1993
wo4ld be considered a source of temporary pollution. (Guidelines
w04ld limit the temporary pollution caused by construction to one
ye~r or less; preferably three months.) However, Gene Potter
wi h Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority stated that the Sugar
Ho low intake is limited by the fixed safe yield of the
wa ershed, so that a new intake is not likely. No water
tr?atment plant is currently planned at Sugar Hollow.
An "exceptional water" designation is more limiting than a Public
Wa er Supply (PWS) designation because discharges are still
pe mitted within a PWS, provided certain standards are met.
The designation would have a very positive effect on the County's
ef orts to protect the South Fork Rivanna Watershed in general,
ana the Moorman's River in particular.
IvIJ S / j cw
cc Deborah Wassenaar, Southern Environmental Law Center
David Hirschman, Water Resource Manager
Gene Potter, Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
Edward H. Bin, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902,4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvi e
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of
Planning and Community Development
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC E1U~
January 19, 1993
BJECT: Petition to Designate the Moormans River as an
Exceptional Water
Attached is a Petition of the Citizens for Albemarle to
assify the Moormans River as an Exceptional Water Under VR
0-21-01.3.C. The Board is being requested to support this
tition. This item is scheduled for review by the Board on
bruary 3, 1993. Please provide the necessary staff report so
at it can be forwarded to the Board along with the petition.
C
tachments
Robert B. Brandenburger
*
Printed on recycled paper
~' Southern
~ Environmental
~ Law Center
201 West Main St., Suite 14
Charlottesville, VA
22901-5064
804-977-4090
FAX 804-977-1483
8 January 1993
North Carolina Office
137 E. Franklin Street,
Suite 404
Chapel Hill, NC 27514-3628
919-967-1450
FAX 919-929-9421
\1': ,6_,
vid Bowerman
air, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
bemarle County Building
Intire Road
arlottesville, Virginia 22902
..
)
ar David:
Enclosed is a copy of the petition to designate the Moormans
ver as an exceptional water. We have also enclosed copies of a
mmary for other members of the Board of Supervisors.
The Moormans petition along with others submitted to the
ate Water Control Board ("SWCB") will be considered at its
rch meeting. If the SWCB decides to move forward, then public
arings will be scheduled in late spring or early summer.
We hope that the Board of Supervisors will support this
tition and will inform the State Water Control Board of your
pport. Letters should be sent to Doneva Dalton and the
dividual State Water Control Board members (addresses
closed) .
We would be glad to appear before a meeting of the Board to
a swer any questions about the petition.
Sincerely,
K S:DMW/cs
E closures
100% recycled paper
. .
~ Southern
~ Environmental
~ Law Center
201 West Main St., Suite 14
Charlottesville. VA
22901-5064
804-977-4090
FAX 804-977-1483
North Carolin,l Office
137 E. Franklin Street,
Suite 404
Chapel Hill, NC 27514-3628
919-967-1450
FAX 919-929-9421
SUMMARY OF THE PETITION TO DESIGNATE
THE MOORMANS RIVER AS AN EXCEPTIONAL WATER
January 1993
Citizens for Albemarle, by counsel, has petitioned the State
ter Control Board to designate as exceptional waters the
ormans River from its headwaters in the Shenandoah National
rk, including its North and South Forks, to its confluence with
e Mechums River near Whitehall. Deborah Murray Wassenaar and
y Slaughter of the Southern Environmental Law Center served as
unsel.
the Desi nation Means:
Federal regulations require all states to establish
gulations that provide special protection for "outstanding
source waters" -- rivers, lakes, streams, or wetlands -- that
ve exceptional recreational or ecological value. In accordance
th these requirements, Virginia adopted in March 1992
gulations to safeguard "exceptional waterways" within the
ate. Waters or portions of waters are eligible for
nsideration and protection under the new Virginia designation
they 1) provide an exceptional environmental setting and 2)
ovide either exceptional aquatic communities or exceptional
creational opportunities. (VR 680-21-01.3.C.2.)
Waters that are designated under this new regulation shall
maintained and protected to prevent permanent or long-term
gradation or impairment. No new or increased discharge of
wage or industrial wastes will be allowed into waters
signated under this category, but water withdrawals will be
lowed.
Property rights will remain unchanged; the protective
gulation will simply control what is directly discharged into
e designated water. Although there can be no new or expanded
int source discharge, use of other types of waste treatment
ch as septic, land application or manmade wetlands, are not
fected.
of Petition:
The Moormans provides an exceptional environmental setting
well as outstanding aquatic life and recreational
portunities.
(over)
100% recycled paper
From its headwaters above Sugar Hollow Reservoir, the river
completely free of human impact. Below Sugar Hollow it is a
st flowing boulder strewn stream flowing through a varied
ndscape of pastures and meadows with a narrow buffer of trees.
e setting provides habitat for a wide variety of wildlife,
eluding turkey, quail, owls and hawks. In addition, there are
number of historic mill sites and colonial roads near the
ream.
The Moormans is considered an outstanding fishery, and in
most any season fly fisherman can be seen on the upper reaches
sting for trout. In addition, there are at least two rare
ecies of freshwater mussels present in the river. Water
ality is considered very good to excellent, and pollution from
noff is minimal. The Moormans is a favorite river for swimmers
d paddlers. Its whitewater is canoeable over its last eight to
n miles, depending on the season.
The Moormans is a Virginia state scenic river, and as such,
already recognized for its scenic, recreational and historic
tributes, and natural beauty. It has also been designated by
e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors as a Scenic River under
e County's zoning ordinance. Albemarle County's Water
sources Protection Areas Ordinance also protects the Moormans
ainst nonpoint source runoff. In addition, there are a number
open space easements that county residertts have voluntarily
tablished along the banks of the Moormans.
The designation of the Moormans River will ensure future
eservation of the exceptional nature of the river.
2
~
~
~
outhern
nvironmental
aw Center
201 West Main St., Suite 14
Charlottesville, VA
22901-5064
804-977-4090
FAX 804-977-1483
2 February 1993
North Carolin,2 Office
137 E. Franklin Street,
Suite 404
Chapel Hill, KC 27514-3628
919-967-1450
FAX 919-929-9421
. David Bowerman, Chair
bemarle County Board of Supervisors
bemarle County Building
Intire Road
arlottesville, Virginia 22902
Re: Petition to Designate the Moormans River as an
"Exceptional Water"
D ar Mr. Bowerman:
The citizens for Albemarle has petitioned the State Water
ntrol Board to designate as exceptional waters the Moormans
ver, from its headwaters in the Shenandoah National Park and
eluding its North and South Forks, to the confluence with the
chum's River near White Hall. We are acting as counsel for the
tizens for Albemarle. We appreciate the opportunity to submit
ditional information to the Albemarle County Board of
pervisors regarding the pending petition. We have previously
ovided you and the other members of the Board of Supervisors
th copies of the petition and a summary of the petition.
As you know, federal regulations require all of the states
t establish regulations that provide special protection for
r vers, lakes, streams, or wetlands that have exceptional
r creational or ecological value. The State Water Control Board
r cently adopted new standards to comply with these regulations
t safeguard exceptional waterways within Virginia. Waters or
p rtions of waters are eligible for consideration and protection
u der the new Virginia designation if they 1) provide an
e ceptional environmental setting and 2) provide either
e ceptional aquatic communities or exceptional recreational
o portunities. VR 680-21-01.3.C.2.
Under this regulation, waters that are designated will be
m intained and protected to prevent permanent or long-term
d gradation or impairment. The major effect of the regulation is
t at no new or increased discharge of sewage or industrial waste
w 11 be allowed into waters designated under this category.
W ter withdrawals would still be allowed, and property rights
w 11 remain unchanged. The protective regulation will simply
c ntrol what is directly discharged into the designated water.
100 % recycled paper
. ..
We believe that the Moormans River meets the criteria under
~e regulation. It provides an exceptional environmental setting
~s well as outstanding aquatic life and recreational
~portunities. It is considered an outstanding fishery, and is a
flavorite river for swimmers and paddlers. It is also home to at
lleast two rare species of freshwater mussels. Current water
quality is very good, and there are no VPDES permits (or point
slource discharges) on the river.
,
I Albemarle County already has a number of important controls
!. place to protect the South Fork of the Rivanna Watershed and
t e Moormans River. We believe that the exceptional waters
signation would be a valuable tool to complement the County's
e isting efforts. Many of the existing controls are tied to
rliparian land use, while the exceptional water designation would
directly address water quality. We believe that designation of
t~e Moormans would be consistent with the County's efforts and
wbuld ensure future preservation of the exceptional nature of the
I'
rll. ver .
,
,
,
We hope that the Board of Supervisors will support the
petition and will inform Mr. Richard Burton, the Executive
Dlirector of the State Water Control Board, and the individual
S~ate Water Control Board members of your support. It is also
i~portant to recognize that, at this point, the State Water
cpntrol Board will only be considering whether the petition has
s~fficient merit to move forward to pUblic hearings. The pUblic
h~aring process will ensure that any questions that are raised
a~e addressed, and the State Water Control Board will make the
d~cision on designation following a public hearing.
,
We would
p~tition.
1
,
,
,
be happy to answer any questions about the
Sincerely yours,
~~~
Deborah Murray Wassenaar
Katherine E. Slaughter
Staff Attorneys
DMw/cs
,
2
,,/
,,,.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scoltsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~\ Co'"
May 11, 1993
'P'
BJECT:
MACAA Appropriation
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Board of Supervisors
esignated that $140,000 from the proceeds of the sale of the
CA property be appropriated and distributed to MACAA. Attached
is the signed appropriation form to reflect that action.
C:mms
ttachment (1)
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
*
Printed on recycled paper
/
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920073
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
CAPITAL
OF APPROPRIATION:
MACCA FOR PURCHASE OF YMCA PROPERTY.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
59000566300 MACCA FOR YMCA PROPERTY $140,000.00
TOTAL
$140,000.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2900 15000150210 SALES OF REAL ESTATE $385,000.00
2900 51000510100 APP. FROM FUND BALANCE (245,000.00)
TOTAL
$140,000.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~~',?7 ~--~-L
t/P c; ;,y (J {'}
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
5" - /tJ -..9.?
~,) - //- 13
Fdward H Bal Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902.4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsvilll'
David P Bowe man
CharlOl1esvill
Cha.rles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y H mphrrs
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
\A/hlle Hall
February 5, 1993
At its meeting on February 3, 1993, the Board of Supervisors
your request to appropriate $140,000 from the proceeds of
of the YMCA property to MACAA. This approval was made
express understanding that the funds would be used for the
p rposes outlined in your request. In addition, this approval is
s bject to participation by City Council as outlined in MACAA's
f"nancial proposal. Once City Council has acted on the request,
p ease notify Mr. Richard Huff who will coordinate the agreement
f r the County.
. Ken Ackerman
CAA
5 East High Street, Suite #7
arlottesville, VA 22902
ar Mr. Ackerman:
e c
ve~70 truly yours,
6",/' '.f!)0L1 .'.., Uklx,'
K~ ! " ~a~l
Ella w. Carey, Clerk, cr-
c
Thomas J. Vandever
Richard E. Huff, II
Melvin Breeden
*
Printed on recycled paper
I;;; C~~ y~' .L 13/9?>
MACAA's Acquisition of the YMCA site
Presentation to Albemarle Board of Supervisors
February 3, 1993
1. Adiusted Amount Reauested from Albemarle County
Fo lowing MACAA's presentation to the Charlottesville city Council
on Monday, February 1st, it appears that a lower one-time payment
is preferred by the City to the proposed escrow arrangement
pr viously considered. Additionally, the potential to base
fi ancing on a 25 or 30 year term was also suggested.
As a result of the above, a reduced amount has been computed to
su port MACAA's borrowing needs based on a 25 year mortgage without
th provision of escrow funding. This adjusted amount for
Al emarle County is now $140,000 rather than the $199,973
or'ginally computed as the amount needed to cover higher interest
co ts through bank financing.
2. Comparison of MACAA's Albemarle Fundina with other Agencies
MA AA's annual funding from Albemarle County of $40,283 would only
be increased by $14-15,000 if the new (one-time) appropriation is
pr rated over a nine or ten year period (the present term in effect
fo the YMCA's repayment schedule). This new amount of
ap roximately $55,000 results in a continued level of relatively
10 er funding for MACAA than other agencies considering the value
of services provided in Albemarle County through MACAA ($564,705).
3. Net Cost to Albemarle County
YMCA's repayment to Albemarle County in the amount of $385,000
ough the sale of the property to MACAA enables a quicker return
the County. A contribution to MACAA in the amount of $140,000
1 enable the County to reinvest the net amount of $245,000 on an
ediate basis. Over the remaining period of the YMCA's loan
(t rough June 30, 2002), the County would realize earnings of
$138,877 on the conservative basis of a five percent rate of
re urn.
Community Involvement and Support
MA AA has benefitted from phenomenal voluntary support from the
private sector to make this project successful. Three local law
fi s have provided assistance with various phases of the project;
si e plans and drawings have been provided at no cost by Bill
At ood; McKee/Carson is assisting with engineering/land use
ma ters; CATEC and several area contractors are serving as advisors
on ethods to economically handle site renovations; CATEC is also
anticipating the possibility of student involvement in some
co onents of the renovation work. Additionally, The Perry
Fou dation has committed $100,000 toward the project, and three
are banks have agreed to participate in a partnership with the
financing.
Co, / - c:2 9'- 9.~~
--~--...~....---.....
~"'..aa.-
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MACAA Fu
Request
February 3, 1993
9 j3. f)/O{,;" c./L
ACTION:--1L-
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT
Addition
request
assist i
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
Huff
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGRO
On Janu
Agency f
$19,973
mortgage
instruct
within b
financin
project
of CharI
for 20 y
at the e
Y 6, 1993, the Board heard a request from the Monticello Area Community Action
r supplemental funding for their ongoing operational budget. This request was for
er year for 10 years to be used to help pay the interest costs associated with a
in order to purchase the YMCA property on Park street. At that meeting, staff was
d to review the financing request and bring back possible alternatives that will fit
th MACAA and their lending institution's requirements. Attached, you will find a
structure sheet which indicates a total project of $1,160,000. Of this total
ost, MACAA intends to borrow $1 million in industrial revenue bonds from the City
ttesville's Industrial Development Authority at an anticipated interest rate of 6%
ars. The financing is structured such that the loan would have to be re-financed
d of 10 years assuming a balance owed of $447,091 at that time.
est ion that had to be addressed in this scenario, was whether or not the lending
institut'on would, in fact, require that the full $199,973 expected from the County be
ed at closing and held in escrow by the bank to guarantee that the funds would be
or whether they would accept a non-binding good faith commitment from the County
riate 1/10 of the total amount each year. After meeting with Mr. Ken Ackerman,
Director of MACAA, he has advised us that the lending institutions will require the
unt of $199,973 to be distributed to MACAA prior to closing. This will provide the
that the lending institution needs, but will also allow MACAA to benefit from the
t potential of those funds over the ten year period.
nd issue staff addressed was the relationship between anticipated county
tion in the rental costs of the proposed Teen Center, should it be located at the
YMCA pr perty. In discussions with Mr. Ackerman, he indicated that anticipated fees
generate from rental of facilities has not been used in forecasting revenue streams to make
this pro ect successful. His feelings at the present time are that any rental fees generated
by the acility would be used to help maintain the property, improve it, and used as a
continge cy for unforeseen problems. The costs projected for rental at the YMCA for the Teen
Center ount to $7.00 per square foot for a total annual cost of approximately $32,350 of
which th County would be asked to fund $16,175. Mr. Ackerman does not see that these rental
costs wo ld supplant the commitment that is being requested of the County in order to secure
the fina cing.
The thi d issue researched was the potential participation in this request by outlying
jurisdic ions who may also benefit from this move. Mr. Ackerman feels very strongly that
because CAA presently has satellite facilities in the outlying counties, with space being
donated 'n most cases by those participating jurisdictions that there is little chance that
surround'ng counties will see the benefit of financially participating in this move.
I
AGENDA ... ITLE:
HACAA Flnding Request
Februar... 3, 1993
Page 2
Lastly, ~r. Ackerman has provided some additional information regarding services provided to
Albemar e County residents which he feels helps to justify the request for additional funding
given tie level of service provided in comparison with other similar non-profit agencies.
His fig\res show that for each local dollar spent, HACAA "pulls down" fourteen dollars in
monies-from other sources for a total program of $564,705 in Albemarle County which includes
a local ~ppropriation of $40,283. Of the total dollars spent in Albemarle, almost 50% is in
the Heac Start Program for disadvantaged 4-year olds.
DISCUSS ON:
The issue of precedent of the Board funding this request for HACAA is one that cannot at this
time be addressed other than to say that HACAA feels their current funding level is
dispropcrtionate to the level of service being provided and, therefore, warrants additional
funds. The fact that the County stands to recover the $385,000 balance on the second deed
of trust when the YMCA property is sold leads HACAA to feel that this request is, in fact,
unique /Jiven the property involved and should not be looked upon by other agencies as
precedert setting.
RECO ATION:
staff r l!commends that if the Board is interested in participating in this project, the
procedule will require that the Board designate that $199,973 from the proceeds of the sale
be apprc~riated and distributed to HACAA with the express understanding that the funds would
be used for the purposes outlined in their request, subject to participation by the City as
outlinec in their financial proposal.
93.007
I
MACAA YMCA PROPERTY ACQUISITION
Financing structure
L PROJECTED COSTS
hase Price
lar unit
ator
ovements
ingencies
TOTAL
$ 700,000
60,000
35,000
300,000
60,000
$1,160,000
L PROJECTED INCOME
of Charlottesville (grant)
y Foundation
of C'ville/Albemarle Co.
TOTAL
$100,000
25,000
34,388 (year one from escrow)
$159,388
pro'ected Costs
Les Income
Loa Total
$1,160,000
159,388
$1,000,612
s: $1,000,000 at 6 percent for 20 years
ents: $7,850/month (years 1-9)
MACAA ($4,984/month from net budgeted space)
C'vlle/Alb ($34,388/yr = $2,866/mo)
$4,984/month (year 10/MACAA)
efinancing anticipated for years 11-20
alance of $447,091 at 10 percent
$5,908/month for 10 years
or
$4,804/month for 15 years
Not
Above figures are based on financial estimates as of
1/11/93. Additional costs are probable to cover interest
only payments from date of closing through end of current
MACAA leases (10/31/93).
., -I
;P.~
0.)>
~ r
::J 0
~~
ro r
en )>
Ci:::D
co (IJ
::J
(ij
)>(IJ
I)>
-o~
00e....
C)>)>
-I::DC
::D 2
m -I
)>
o
I
o
o
C
2
(IJ
m
c:
2
G>
(lJe....
I)>
mCD
)>
01
<n
(,.)
....,
<n
~
I\)
f:CO ..... ..... (,.) <n I\) c.,
.....CO.....010-l>o1\)
0.....0>-1>0.........,0>
CO :.. cli,) ~ ~ t
~~g~2~0
-1>0
c.,
(0
CO
c.,
0>
(,.)
I\)
f:01..... I\) i\> ..... a
"'(,,)01010-1>0(0
I\)...OCO(o.....01
1\):..c.,<n~N'O
0>010010101(0
.....00(,.).....-1>0-1>0
0>
Ol
~
~
~I\) ...
(01\)1\)(,,)0101(0
COOl 1\)-1>000-1>0
O1'O'O'O~-tc.,
0>0....,....,...., .....
0100001 0
-1>0
0>
(,.)
~
t
..... .....
1\)-1>00>-1>001(,,)
01(,.).....001....,
'0 en m adl) '0
0(,.)0>....,-1>0(,.)
00.....0>.....0>
...., 100""'-I>o....,COO1(O
(0 (,.)1\)(,.)1\)0....,0
~ :...~c..,<ou,oo
(,.) coOO>CO....,(OO>
-s. -s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.
~ I~jj~j~~
01 01
CO I\) I\)
Cn II\) :.. N 01 <n 01 N
o 0>(,.)01-1>00.....(0
o .....(000)01\)1\)
01
I\)
i\>
(,.)
(,.)
-1>0
-"-"....a.(a) (.)
'OOo~Cncom
1\)011\)0.....1\)
00-1>001\)"'"
(,.)
CO
-s.
,.....
0-1>0(,.)1\)(,.)1\)1\)
COO>-I>o ""'1\)
~-s.-s.-s.~-s.-s.
CD
c-I
8~
~~
'TI
m
o
0-
-I(IJ
I~
m-l
::Dm
o
G>O
::DC
)>2
~:;1
G>
::DO
)>-
~:;1
0-0
-1m
J:::D
mO
::D~
$-1
0-0
Om
C::D
20
:;1~
$-1
-0
m
o::D
-0
:;1~
$-1
o
o
::DC
m2
~:;1
::DO
m-
~:;1
O"tl
o!B
CO
2m
:;1~
"tI
m
::D
00
_m
:;1~
o
-i
:::I:
m
JJ
>
(j)
m
z
("')
m
en
-I
~
)>
r
CD
C
8
~
-oOOe....OI(lJI-oI20)>
::D 'oO)>oco)>mmIO
O:SS:CDS:-os:-o::D)>r-s:
~~S:-I-oms:m~o~52
~oI~~66!B6-1~2I
oc=i~::Dc-<c~)>o~
U5(IJ-<ZN(lJO(IJZ~~~
02-oG>0~c~mo 5J:
OG>::D Z-;i . 0-0
riio8 m )>)>
::D 0 ::D s: m::D -Iz::D
-<c)> -0
2s: r m
~(IJ Q ::D
c: (IJ
Z I
G> -0
I\)
~
...
:..
f:... 1\)..... -1>0..... co ........
o 1\)"'" (0 1\)0>(,,)0 I\) co (0 (0 (0
0>01-1>001010(,.).....1\).....011\)....,
1\):..'(.,<oc.,<n:..i\>~~i\>Cni\>
CO---l-l>o(,.)......(,.)01I\)O(O(,.)1\)
COO> 0...., (Xl0>0'" 0>"'" 010....,
(,.)
01
I\)
~
0>
P
m
....,
1\)... -1>0
f:0:::j~1\)- 0 t ~ N ~ ~ ~
'v en <0 <0 Cn - ~
f\)(,,)....A.......(..,)--....I
(,.)""'(Xl0>001
(Xl
CO (0 (0 0>
.....011\)....,
~i\>Cn<n
o (0 (,.) .....
0.....0101\)
~ ~~
(,.)
<n
I\)
0>
01
(0
o
...
~ ~~~~
(0 1\)""'(0
01 0>0>.....
I\)
~
o
o
I\)
I\)
(Xl~
(XlI\)
0> 0>
..... ...... -" ....I. ....&. .....
(0 I"'" (Xl 0 01 0 0 (0 0 0 0 CO
-1>0 (,.)0(00.....00(0000001
-s. -s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.
J\) II\) 0 01 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 ....,
~ ;-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.
(,.)
.....
(Xl
I~
-1>0(,,)
00
-1>0
(0-1>0
01
o
0>
01
(Xl
m
I~ ~ 0> 0> -1>0 ..... ~ 0> CO
OOOOO(,.)O(oO(Xl
'-~ '"~.\ ~
.....
.....
01
....,
-s.
I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CD
C-I
8~
~~
(,.)
<n
I\)
01
'TI
m
o
0-
-I(IJ
J:~
m-l
::Dm
o
G>O
::DC
>2
~:;1
.....
51>
.....
(0
o
G>
::Do
)>-
~:;1
0-0
-1m
I::D
mO
::D~
$-1
O"tl
Om
C::D
20
:;1~
$-1
"tI
m
Q~
:;1~
$-1
()
o
::DC
m2
9>:;1
::DO
m-
9>:;1
O"tl
0!B
CO
2m
:;1~
-0
m
::D
00
_m
:;1~
3:
>
("')
>
>
>
(j)
m
z
("')
-<
("')
o
Z
-i
JJ
OJ
C
-i
o
Z
en
j-c2 9-<?~
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Supplement Request
February 3, 1993
9,3. o/2-L)3. cj 3
ACTION:-L-
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT P
Request
supplemen
officers'
RE UEST:
direction regarding
ing various constitutional
employees' salaries.
-
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Huff
REVIEWED BY:
r
BACKGRO
As you m y recall, our constitutional officers requested supplements for their employees
during la t year's budget deliberations. It was the Board's feeling at that time that it was
a policy decision and chose not to address their request in the current year's budget.
Again, in next year's request, several constitutional officers have again requested that the
Board re iew the practice of supplementing various positions as is done in many other
localitie. These supplements are being requested in order to bring their employees up to
a wage th t is comparable with similar county funded positions which may be at a pay grade
higher th n that which is approved by the Compensation Board for positions state-wide.
DISCUSSIO
After hea the requests from various constitutional officers, it is staff's opinion that
this issu should be studied comprehensively in order to make a recommendation to the Board
as to how this could be implemented should the Board choose to proceed further. It does not
appear to be equitable to supplement the salaries in one constitutional officer's office and
not anot er when the same argument can often be made as to the relationship of their
employees' salaries with county positions. It should be noted that there are several
mechanism by which other jurisdictions supplement salaries in these offices. Some will give
a straigh salary supplement as a percentage of base salary, some a straight dollar amount
per emplo ee, others place the employees on the county's or city'S pay scale and factor them
according y, while still others choose to supplement based on longevity or related factors.
In order to make a recommendation to the Board, should this be requested, it is staff's
opinion t at a thorough review be completed of the practices of those localities which the
County n rmally surveys in its market survey to set compensation levels for all county
employees. This review would be done for all constitutional officers, their employees, and
the Regis rar as well as the Joint Security Complex, because of its relationship to jail
funding in localities which have sheriffs operating jails. Any supplement to the Joint
Security Complex, however, would require concurrence and participation by the City of
Charlotte ville.
RECOMMEND TION:
If the Bo rd is interested in considering the requests made by the constitutional officers
for their employees, staff requests that the Board direct a review be done as outlined above
to be bro ght back to the Board in time for review during budget deliberations.
93.006
L': "::"~ :-. -:'. ,",:' .~ . ..." ;. r::.'..\ ~ r.:R$
e; ..<~. /-c-2 '}'- '7cj '.-
- ..--,.-......_-'.,.--..'...,.,.~-.>..._.~.._...........
'County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
:
Arson Investigator Position
SUBJECT ROPOSAL RE UEST:
Jefferso Country Fire and Rescue
Associat . on has requested the County to
fund an rson investigation position in the
FY 94 budget. Due to a recent
reorgani ation, the county's Fire
Preventi n Officer position is currently
vacant hich, if the County is to begin
doing a son investigations, would lend
itself very well to assuming that
responsi ility. Staff requests direction
from the Board prior to filling the vacant
Fire Pre ention Officer's position.
STAFF CO ACT S :
Messrs. ucker and Huff
February 3, 1993
93. O~(:J.3.rf
ACTION:--1L-
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes ~
REVIEWED BY' ;&# /
BACKGRO
On Nove 25, 1992, the members of the Jefferson County Fire and Rescue Association
unanimou approved the attached report regarding cause and origin/arson investigations.
This rep rt was compiled by a committee of JCFRA members in response to ongoing concerns
regard in suspicious fires and the ability of the volunteer organizations to conduct the
proper i vestigation of such fires. The report outlines the issues surrounding the request
by the olunteers for the County to fund a position to assist in doing investigations of
fires. It is the recommendation of JCFRA that this position would serve as an additional
Fire Pre ention Inspector who would also have the role of Fire Marshall for Albemarle County
to conduct necessary investigations of fires in which no origin can be determined by the
voluntee s or which are reported as suspicious by some volunteer chiefs. The two major
points s rrounding the request have to do with the lack of proper training of some of the
voluntee chiefs to conduct the proper investigation to determine if it appears to be
suspicio s and warrants further investigation and secondly, the tremendous time commitment
required of the chief once the fire is extinguished to conduct a thorough investigation. A
good exa ple of the issues involved would be the recent fire at Shoney's at Rio Hill Shopping
Center. There did not appear to be any immediate or readily apparent cause for such fire
intensit that the fire fighters experienced when responding with a six minute response time.
The volu teer fire chief on the scene had been on the scene from 2:30 a.m. to 6:30 a.m. prior
to the s ate police investigator arriving and did not feel that he could conduct a proper
investig tion to determine if the fire appeared to be suspicious. To have left the scene and
returned when he was fully rested would have meant the loss of valuable time and possibly
contamin tion of the scene prior to an investigation being conducted. He requested that the
County F re Prevention Officer respond to the scene for assistance before contacting a state
police i vestigator to respond from Lynchburg. This is a fairly common occurrence where the
chief w uld like some additional advice before asking the state police to travel long
distance in the middle of the night before determining whether suspicious origin is, indeed,
present. The attached report outlines very succinctly the issues as expressed by the chiefs
in numer us interviews regarding this subject.
As addre
disturbe
Appomatt
unf amil i
concerns
seem to
issue f
jurisdic
sed in quality of investigation in the JCFRA report, many fire chiefs are greatly
at the length of time it takes to get a state police officer from Lynchburg or
x to perform the investigations. Once on scene, the investigator if often
r with procedures of the volunteers and related issues. Chiefs report instances of
about the quality of investigation done. Discussions with State Police officials
ave had little impact on these concerns. Obviously, this appears to be a manpower
r the state as well, as each state investigator is responsible for 10-17
ions.
AGENDA 'l ITLE:
Arson Irvestigator Position
Februar, 3, 1993
Page 2
DISCUSS ON:
The rea ~on this request is before the Board now and not at budget time, is that in the
process of reorganizing the county's Fire/Rescue Administration Division, the County's
current Fire Prevention Officer was promoted to Division Chief of Fire/Rescue Administration,
thereby leaving the Fire Prevention Officer slot vacant. It is staff's recommendation that,
if the Eoard is desirous of providing this assistance to the volunteers, that it be done at
the Fir ~ Prevention Officer level and not at a level below the Fire Prevention Officer.
Obvious y, there would be a number of details that would need to be worked out if the Board
desires to move in this direction, but again it is the feeling of staff that if this function
is to bE provided, it should be advertised as the responsibility of the new Fire Prevention
Officer when that vacancy is filled. The level of expertise required to do these
investi~ ations is significant and it is felt that the County will attract a much better
qua1ifiE d and experienced candidate if this aspect is included in the Fire Prevention
Officer s responsibilities.
RECO ATION:
staff rEquests that the Board provide some guidance on this issue prior to filling the Fire
prevent'on Officer's current vacancy. If this function is not to be provided, staff would
like to fill the current Fire Prevention Officer's position as soon as possible in order to
provide the manpower necessary to meet the existing workload. If cause and origin/arson
investi~ations are to be provided, staff would recommend that the Fire Prevention Officer
positioI be rewritten to include this responsibility and that a Fire Prevention Inspector's
positioI be considered in the FY 94 budget to help assume some of the workload of the Fire
prevent'on Officer who would be more heavily involved with these investigations.
93.009
.
.
.
JEFFERSON COUNTRY FIRE AND RESCUE ASSOCIATION, INC.
W.
'if
203 RIDGE STREET
CHARLOTIESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901
Mike Schlemmer, Albemarle County Fire and ~rdinator
FRO~: Julian H. Taliaferro, Secretary/Treasurer ~
DATt: 2 December 1992
TO:
RE: J.C.F.R.A. Cause and Origins/Arson Investigation Report
Per your request be advised that at the 25 November 1992
meeting of the Jefferson Country Fire and Rescue Association,
the referenced report was unanimously approved by the
representatives of all companies in attendance.
JHT:wpg
"Serving Charlottesville - Albemarle Since 1972"
.
.
.
.
.
.
.,
Cause and Origin/Arson Investigations
.
A Jefferson Country Fire and Rescue Association Report
October 28, 1992
Much has been said in recent years regarding the mechanism
th,t is in place concerning the investigation of suspicious fires
in Albemarle County. While exact figures representing the
ma< nitude of this issue are not available, it is known that
aplroximately 70-75 fires are reported each year to the Virginia
St,te Police as either suspicious, unable to determine a cause and
wa rants further investigation, or, are suspected criminal events.
Fi e personnel report that because of the existing mechanisms, many
bo derline cases are not reported.
In calendar 1991, there were 154 reported structure fires in
Al'pemarle County. Of this total only 53 (34 %) had a probable cause
de ermined. The remaining 66% were undetermined or could not tell
fnllm preliminary investigations done by volunteers. structure
fi es accounted for approximately 5% of all calls responded to in
19( 1 by the fire departments and 9% of all calls that were not
vel icle accident or medical assist related.
Under the current system, an attempt is made by the volunteer
ch ef, or senior fire officer on the scene to determine the cause
an< origin of a structure fire. If the fire appears to be
su picious in any way, a state police arson investigator is called
to investigate. At no time are County fire prevention personnel
in olved in the process unless a commercial or industrial building
nel ds to be posted as unsafe by County personnel.
.
The current system has a number of problems and flaws
as ociated with it. Some would be classified as matters of
co venience, others are concerns expressed by the volunteers
re<arding quality of service given to Albemarle County residents.
SOI~e of these issues are as follows:
1) Time Commitment
There are two specific issues of concern under this
heading. First, is the individual chief's time
commitment necessary to do even a preliminary cause
and origin investigation on a structure fire.
Proper procedur~ calls for a thorough review of the
physical evidence as well as interviewing the
owner, family members, and other potential
witnesses.
Secondly, if a fire is determined to be SUSplC10US,
a state police investigator is requested who may
take 2-5 hours to arrive, depending on
.
1
.
.
.
,
availability. This investigator may be coming from
Appomattox, South Boston, Staunton, or other
outlying areas. If a suspicious scene is not
secured and maintained until an investigator
arrives, an important element of the investigation
is lost and can often lead to a dismissal should
the case go to court. This "babysitting" the scene
is extremely time consuming for the volunteers who
are typically anxious to get back to work or back
to bed.
-.
2 )
Training
Albemarle County presently has no training
requirements in order to qualify to be a chief or
senior officer in our volunteer fire departments.
Consequently, there is no consistency found in the
level of training these officers receive in the
area of cause and origin investigations. Some
chiefs have received 2-3 hours of training in this
area as a result of other classes taken, some have
received more, some less. This varying level of
training is supplemented in some areas with pure
experience while the small number of structure
fires in other areas provide little additional
exposure to cause and origin skills.
.
3 )
Reluctance to Categorize Fires as Suspicious
In discussions with volunteers, it is clear that
there exists some degree of reluctance to accept,
as a volunteer, the responsibility and potential
liability of making a determination of "suspicious
cause". There is a concern that this will lead to
being called to court to testify (consuming more
personal time) only to have their "expert" status
called into question by a defense attorney. This
reluctance frequently leads to a finding of
undetermined cause on borderline cases.
4) Quality of Investigation
Experience with various state police investigators
reflect a wide disparity in the perceived quality
of investigations done on suspicious fires. Often,
the investigator is unfamiliar with the area, the
level of preliminary investigation done, as well as
unfamiliarity -with other suspicious fires in the
county which may begin to reflect a pattern.
5 )
Insurance Company Requirements
The volunteer chiefs are often the target of irate
insurance companies who feel that a thorough
investigation should be done on every fire. The
disservice to the taxpayer occurs when an insurance
.
2
.
.
.
. ,
company delays paYlng a claim for an extended
period of time while an insurance investigator
attempts to recreate the event and make a
determination whether or not foul play has taken
place.
state law gives the fire chief the authority to see that an
i vestigation into the cause and origin of fires is conducted.
T ere is no legal requirement that an i vnestigation be done,
h wever, many in the fire service are keenly reminded that the
s atistics gathered from investigations form the basis for a
s ccessful fire prevention program. Educating the public ln a
c mprehensive prevention program has been proven to be much more
c st effective than the same resources spent in a suppression
p ogram. Under current conditions, very little data is available
t develop an analysis of patterns which may be present.
R commendation: In an effort to relieve the volunteers of the time
i tensive function of investigating fires of unknown cause, it is
r commended that the County budget for a new position in its 1993-
9 budget. This position would serve the dual role of Fire
P evention Inspector/Fire Marshall and as such would have
sponsibility for investigating all substantial structure fires
ere the cause was not readily apparent.
In order to make this a successful position, a set of
refully drawn standard operating procedures will need to be
veloped. These standard operating procedures will need ~o set
ecise parameters for call-out of this individual to prevent
necessary overtime, they will need to spell out quite carefully
at the extent of his/her authority will be and clearly define the
lationship that will exist with law enforcement personnel. It is
is association's recommendation that the Albemarle County Police
partment become a partner with the fire service to assist in
llecting physical evidence and developing the criminal cases that
uld need to be developed. This arrangement is used in the City
Charlottesville successfully as well as in a number of other
J risdictions.
This arrangement will provide a central point of contact for
Prevention and Fire Incident reporting for the County. It
w'll relieve the volunteers of both the time required to "babysit"
spicious scenes as well as the time involved doing
vestigations. It will provide a consistent level of expertise
unty wide so that all resid~nts of Albemarle County are afforded
e same quality service and sets the framework to develop
c mprehensive data for an effective prevention effort for our
community.
3
.'
.
.
~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
POLICY FOR EVALUATING REQUESTS
FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY
It shall be the policy of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, to evaluate all requests for public transportation service to an area
or shopping center using the following criteria:
1. All requests be directed to the Department or Planning and Community
Development for the Transportation Planner's review.
2. The Department will evaluate the request through the following
process:
a. Obtain comments/recommendations from the Charlottesville Transit
Service (CTS) including information on potent ial ridership and
cost of service. Comments from the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation (VDoT) will also be obtained.
b. Obtain comments/recommendations from the Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) regarding regional impact of proposed service.
c. Evaluate the request based on its consistency with the Compre-
hensive Plan and other County transportation and human/public
service policies/plans.
3. The Department will provide CTS and MPO comments and Planning staff
recommendations to the County Executive's office.
!L The County Executive's office will then make recommendations to the
Board of Supervisors on the service request.
In addition, retail merchants and citizens,requesting new or expanded bus
service can contact the Department of Planning and Community Development. If
other departments or individuals receive requests, they should be directed to
tne Department of Planning and Community Development. Staff will use the exist-
ing criterion established in the Public-Private Sector Transportation Alterna-
tives (PPSTA) report, the objectives and strategies of the Comprehensive Plan
and any associated Neighborhood Plans in considering public requests. The
Department will work with CTS in evaluating the feasibility of service. The
recommendation will then be forwarded to the County Executive for budgetary
cclnsideration.
"I~ ,'(. ..,'(. 'k )'(
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing, is a true,
correct copy of a policy unanimously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular lueeting held on February 3, 1993.
. >f& te) (ZILw-t
&;{ Board of count(JuperVisors
,"' -, , i:~;,..\2~RS
'J:, / - 02 9' - 7';;
.._:-L._.,_._.....,' ....,_.-"'-......_.._::::..._
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
:
Bus Ser ice Requests
SUBJECT
Propose
Center
STAFF C
Messrs.
February 3, 1993
7:..8, 0';<(.15 'I~
ACTION:
INFORMATION:~
Shopping
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY' ~
Huff
BACKGRO
Over th several months, staff has received requests for the County to consider
providi g bus service to the Pantops Shopping Center area as well as the new Walmart store
on Rout 29 North. Due to the significant costs involved and potential policy issues
surroun ing what criteria will be used in considering these requests, staff has prepared the
attache report for the Board's consideration.
DISCUSS
The Cou
route i
(CTS) .
expandi
transit
1990,
County.
service
criteri
cons ide
ON:
ty currently helps fund two routes which serve Albemarle County residents and a third
provided to Piedmont Virginia Community College by Charlottesville Transit Service
In order to evaluate the two requests that the County has received regarding
g CTS, the staff has recommended that the seven criteria for estimating potential
demand found in the Public/Private Transit Alternatives for Urban Albemarle County -
hich was adopted by the Metropolitan Planning Organization to be used for Albemarle
These seven criteria provide a stable evaluation of whether additional requests for
can be justified. Staff has evaluated both of the current requests using these
and have found both to meet the necessary elements in order to qualify for funding
ation.
The est mated cost of starting a new route to Walmart or Pantops would be a net cost of
$60,000 per year for each route requested by the County. The County cannot expect any state
or fede al assistance to offset the cost at this time given current funding allocations. CTS
advises that it has the necessary buses to add one or the other of the new routes without
purchas'ng new buses but indicates that if both routes are added a new bus would have to be
purchas d at an estimated cost of $200,000. The county could expect 50% to 90% of the cost
of a ne bus to be reimbursed at some future date. Should the County wish to proceed
immedia ely with both routes, an additional bus could be leased at a cost of approximately
$21,600 per year.
The iss e of participation in these costs by those requesting the service is one that is
difficu t to review. At the present time, Seminole Square Shopping Center, Shopper's World
Shoppin Center, Fashion Square Mall, Albemarle Square and Rio Hill Shopping Center do not
pay for the bus service they are receiving. Obviously, the routes provide service to
residen ial areas adjacent to each route making participation by commercial applicants
difficu t to evaluate.
CTS off'cials advise that due to the printing of route schedules, they need SOme direction
from th County by April 1st. This printing of schedules would preclude doing a route for
any thin less than a one year trial.
I
IT
AGENDA ~ ITLE:
Bus Ser,ice Requests
Februar' 3, 1993
Page 2
RECOMMElmATION:
Staff s\ggests that the recommendations listed on Page 11, Section 6, Paragraph A and B be
adopted as the policy criteria by which all requests will be evaluated. Funding necessary
to suppc rt the addition of any additional routes at this time does not appear to be available
within. t he allocation provided for General Government during budget direction guidelines set
for the 1993-94 budget. If the Board is interested in reviewing these requests financially
in light of other unfunded requests, staff could add the routes to the unfunded priority list
for coni ideration by the Board during budget deliberations.
93.013
r
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
BUS SERVICE IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DECEMBER, 1992
,
I Introduction - Present Transit Status
I . New Bus Service
A. Evaluating Criteria
B. Evaluation
C. Monitoring of Service
D. Authorization
I I. Fiscal Aspects of New Bus Service
A. Funding
1. Federal
2. State
3. Local
I,17. Possible Routes
A. Pantops Area
B. Walmart Shopping Center/Route 29 North
C. Others (Colonnades, Branchlands, The Senior Center)
D. Limitations and Cost
E. Alternative Funding
V Implementation Schedule
V. Conclusion
A. County Recommendations on Evaluating Request for
Service
B. Merchants/Citizen Input on New Service
C. New Service Recommendation
V I. Attachments
A. Charlottesville Transit System Area System Map
B. Level of Service (LOS) Definitions
C. Census Blocks with High Commuter Potential
D. Census Blocks with More Than Three Criterion
E. Federal Reimbursement Worksheet
F. State Aid for Public Transportation - Maximum
Eligibility Calculations
G. Route 7
H. Route 8
I . Rou te 9
I INTRODUCTION - PRESENT TRANSIT STATUS
ansit service in Albemarle County is provided by
arlottesville Transit Service (CTS), JAUNT, private taxi cabs,
d University Transit Service (UTS). CTS and UTS provide
e-arranged route service and riders can now transfer from one
ansit service to the other. JAUNT provides demand response
rvice and human service agency transportation in the urbanized
ea and throughout the surrounding counties. The objective of
blic transportation according to the County's Comprehensive
an is to encourage: (1) the reduction of traffic congestion,
llution, and energy consumption; and (2) increased mobility of
e general public, especially the elderly, handicapped, and
sadvantaged through the increased use of public transportation
d car/vanpooling, and through the integration and coordination
existing transit service.
S is a public bus service provided by the City of
arlottesville through its Public Works Department. Under a
ntract between the City and Albemarle County, residents are
ovided three fixed routes: Route 7, Route 8 and Route 9.
ute 7 (see Attachment G), which travels on the east side of
ute 29 to Albemarle Square and Fashion Square Mall, is the
unty's busiest route. In FY 1992, it carried 201,652 riders
th a frequency every thirty (30) minutes, six days a week
:30 a.m. - 7:00 p.m.). Route 8 (see Attachment H) travels to
edmont Virginia Community College. The route is entirely
nded by the City of Charlottesville. Route 9 (see Attachment
is a more residential route, which travels west of Route 29 to
o Hill Shopping Center. It carried 31,692 riders in FY 1992
th a frequency every hour during commuter hours (7-10 a.m. and
7 p.m.). The Saturday and mid-day frequency is every other
ur.
University of Virginia established UTS as part of, and
pporting, the University Parking System. UTS provides service
University Heights and the Copely area which is in the County.
is service is provided in addition to CTS. There is no charge
the County. UTS provides this service because of the high
ncentration of students in those areas.
UNT, Inc. is a public service corporation in which the member
cali ties hold interest. The members are the City of
arlottesville and the Counties of Albemarle, Nelson, Louisa and
uvanna. It only provides para-transit service in the City.
UNT operates from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday
a d provides the following types of service in Albemarle County:
o Demand response service to general public, with special
fares for handicapped persons.
1
o Weekday commuter routes originating in other counties, but
passing through Albemarle and picking up residents.
o Human service agency contract and demand response service to
agency clients.
o RideShare, a carpool and vanpool matching service targeted
to commuters.
e area is also served by a number of taxicab companies. They
ovide demand-response service to the general public. Yellow
b is contracted to provide transportation for handicapped
rsons when JAUNT is not available (i.e. after 6:30 p.m. and
ekends). This contract is processed through CTS. Albemarle
unty pays CTS directly.
is report focuses on CTS providing
unty and how it would be evaluated,
nitored as well as any limitations.
new service to Albemarle
implemented, financed, and
I. NEW BUS SERVICE
A Evaluating Criteria
e Public-Private Transit Alternatives for Urban Albemarle
unt Vir inia - 1990 adopted by the Metropolitan Planning
ganization (MPO) and Albemarle County to consider planning and
plementing public transit service for the urban portion of the
unty lists the seven (7) criteria for estimating potential
ansit demand. They are:
1 socio-Economic Characteristics
age
income
disability
vehicles per household
percent with no telephone
percent of transportation handicapped
2 Commuter Potential
3 Density of Population
4 Location of Activity Centers
5 Level-of-Service on Existing Roads
6 Existing Transit Service
7 Availability of Parking
2
S io-Economic Characteristics
Older persons
likely to use
re least likely
males between the
were more likely to ride
UTS. Persons between the
to choose the bus unless
ages of 35 and 45.
CTS; college age,
ages of 25 and 60
they were working
Persons in households earning less than $30,000 were the
candidates for bus use.
While there is no direct correlation
a handicapped person in the home and the
r travel, federal guidelines require attention be
s gment of the population.
between the
mode choice
given to the
hicles Per Household: Two passenger vehicles in a household
rtually eliminates bus use according to national studies.
P
1
ent: The higher the unemployment, the more
used for travel.
rcent of Households Without Tele hones: This is thought to be
manifestation of lower income households, and has been found to
pact transit use.
of Trans ortation Disadvanta e:
nction of several others and represents a
sability, vehicles, and age.
This factor is a
composite of income,
e fastest-growing public transit commuter population consists
women aged 25 to 54. This fact emerged as a result of aCTS
der survey in 1981 and the RideShare 1986 survey. The MPO
ansit Survey found that females, ages 20 to 44, earning less
an $15,000 per year, were most likely to choose the bus for
rk trips.
her variables which indicate commuter transit potential are
mpatibility of transit and work schedules, bus headways
requency), reliability, and public knowledge of the system.
pulation Density, Current and Planned
e density of population (population per square mile) is an
portant factor in ascertaining potential demand. A high
ncentration of people not only translates into a stronger
ansit market, but is essential for financial feasibility. A
nerally accepted rule is that areas containing a density
eater than 1,500 people per square mile are candidates for
xed route service if other criteria are present. Areas with
3
1 wer densities are better served by a demand response system
p ovided other criteria indicate a need. The City's density is
4 300 people per square mile, the overall county urban density is
1 442 person per square mile.
tivity Centers
of trips to an area is another factor in determining
demand. Major trip attractors include employment
nters, retail and commercial space, health care facilities,
creational areas, and education institutions. An area with a
gnificant activity center will be a candidate for transit
rvice, independent of other characteristics.
activity center location must be made with the
that they are not continual generators. Employment
nters, such as offices and industrial sites, have well-defined
ak hours of in-coming and out-going trips. Shopping centers
tract trips throughout the operating hours with some peaking to
commodate employees and shoppers.
vel-of-Service on Existing Roads
of service" (LOS) measures the ability of the road to
commodate moving traffic. A road level-of-service (LOS) rating
C or below is used in some cities to indicate that areas
jacent to that road would be most likely to make use of new or
ditional transit service because people will choose efficient
ansit over a slowly moving car. However, the bus would need
ecial roadway consideration (such as a dedicated bus lane) or
uld need to travel on better LOS-rated roads to achieve this
ficiency. Increased bus availability is considered one of the
ols available to alleviate congestion.
x levels-of-service are defined for each type of facility for
ich analysis procedures are available. They are given letter
signations, from A to F, with level-of-service A representing
e best operating conditions and level-of-service F the worst
ee Attachment B for descriptions of each level-of-service).
isting Transit Service
ere transit service already exists, consideration of additional
rvice may be appropriate. Level of ridership, rate of increase
ridership, public requests for service, anticipated
velopment along route, and convenience of the existing service
s ould all be considered.
4
A ailability of Parking
S udies have shown that areas deficient in parking are more
1 kely targets for transit service. This does not typically
r present a problem in the County.
B
Evaluation
1990 PPSTA report analyzed the County Urban Area for each
iterion to determine areas of greatest potential demand and
portunity for service. The analysis was done based on data
the red at census block and traffic analysis zone (TAZ) level
ee Attachments C and D - maps from PPSTA report).
C
Monitoring of Service
C arlottesville Transit Service monitors ridership levels on
r utes and advises County staff on appropriate modifications to
r utes. CTS provides annual ridership levels upon request on
e ch route during the budget request period.
D
Authorization
T e County Board of Supervisors "authorizes" bus service by
f nding routes on an annual basis. CTS makes annual budget
r quests to the Board of Supervisors. CTS is responsible for
p ovision of service. County/CTS/VDOT agree on bus stop
1 cations and their maintenance.
I I. FISCAL ASPECTS OF NEW BUS SERVICE
A Funding
1 Federal
T Federal Government funds local public transportation systems
t the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA). FTA
f nds up to 50% of a locality's operation deficit, the locality
m st fund at least 50%. FTA considers funding from the State as
1 cal funding. (FTA Reimbursement Worksheet, see Attachment E).
State funds local public transportation systems through the
wly formed Virginia Department of Rural and Public
ansportation (VDRPT). Of the remaining 50% of the gross cost,
RPT funds 95% of fuel, tires and maintenance, 50%
inistrative costs and 80% of ridesharing efforts. (State Aid
r Public Transportation, see Attachment F.)
2
State
5
tachments E and F produce the maximum potential share, and this
ount is not usually realized. VDRPT informs localities,
ually in the Spring, as to what their FTA and VDRPT shares will
tually be. If expenditures are increased by adding service in
e County, and the County is already receiving the maximum FTA
d VDRPT fundin the additional ex enditures must be aid b
e Count .
be noted that the state has not been able to meet their
are in the past four or five years. The cost has been offset
the City and County.
3
Local
cal share of funding for CTS service comes from City/County/UVA
propriations, farebox revenues, and CTS advertising. The
unty funds CTS services from the County's operation budget.
e County makes a direct appropriation to CTS for providing
rvice in the County. The County will pay $29,500 for Route 7
d Route 9 for FY 93-94. Farebox revenues are dependent on the
e of the route. The cost per rider is sixty cents ($.60). The
vertisement revenues for CTS is $15,000 per year. This total
generated from all 10 bus routes and is not considered a major
come source.
POSSIBLE ROUTES
Pantops
ere is presently a request from the Pantops area for bus
rvice. The Board of Supervisors has denied funding bus service
Pantops in the past. The Board's concern has been the fact
at service would be provided primarily to the Pantops Shopping
nter only. Routes 7 and 9 provide a much more extensive
rvice to residential and commercial areas. Several
velopments have recently taken place or been approved for the
ntops area. They include the State Farm expansion, McDonalds,
nter Haven, Ashcroft subdivision, Overlook Apartments, Wilton
rms Apartments and Westminister Canterbury.
S estimates that a new route would cost about $75,000 per year
run and would carry about 25,000 passengers per year. This
timate is based on the CTS FY 1991 budget request for the
ute. CTS conducted a complete route study which included test
ns and approximate mileage. These figures can be used today
cording to CTS. CTS is willing to conduct a complete
asibility study for Pantops, as well as service to Wal-Mart
iscussed later), if the County is serious about providing bus
rvice. The necessity of bus service to the Pantops area was
searched based on criterion noted in Section II.
6
1 Socio-Economic Characteristics (based on Census Tract 105 -
1990 Census, the Pantops/Glenorchy area)
Ac~e - 18 years - 15
19 years - 17
20 years - 12
21 years - 20
22 to 24 years - 56
25 to 29 years - 126
30 to 34 years - 148
34 to 39 years - 165
40 to 44 years - 155
45 to 49 years - 108
50 to 54 years - 114
55 to 59 years - 87
60 to 61 years - 33
62 to 64 years - 38
65 yo 69 years - 78
70 to 74 years - 46
75 to 79 years - 21
80 to 84 years - 18
85 years and over - 12
CE nsus Tract 105 has a total population of 1,708. This does not
i clude the Wilton Farms Apartments, which is now being occupied.
T e population estimate is Wilton Farms is 360 (144 units). A
pcortion of these units are priced for low and moderate income
hcpuseholds.
Income The median income is $51,104 (includes entire
Census Tract)
Disability - 6.3% of the population has some degree of
mobility and/or self-care limitations.
Vehicles Per Household - 2.21
Percent With No Telephones - Negligible
Percent of Transportation Handicapped - N/A
2 Commuter Potential - 62% of the population are between the
ages of 25 and 69.
3 Density of Population 182 persons per square mile. The
entire census tract is not being considered for bus service.
(Does not include full occupancy of Wilton Farm Apartments).
4 Location of Activity Centers - Pantops Shopping Center,
Westminister Canterbury and State Farm and 250,000 square
feet of office space in Pan tops area.
7
5 Level of Service of Existing Roads Adequate
(Level-of-service C or better), once Route 250 expansion is
complete. A level-of-service C or better is preferred.
6 Existing Transit Service - JAUNT, private taxi cabs.
7 Availability of Parking - Sufficient parking is available.
S aff recommends providing service to the Pantops area. The
P ntops area meets the criterion of major activity centers, and
tree criterion for transit dependent population (see Attachment
D. The Public-Private Transit Alternatives for Urban Albemarle
C unt - 1990 notes that an area with a significant activity
c nter will be a candidate for transit service, independent of
o her characteristics.
W stminister Canterbury is willing to run their shuttle bus to
P ntops Shopping Center. State Farm Insurance officials suggest
t eir employees would not be a major transit user. The bus would
b sically make a loop around Pantops Shopping Center. The
r sidents of Wilton Farm Apartments will have a desire or need
f r transit service. The Comprehensive Plan and The Public-
P ivate Transit Alternatives for Urban Albemarle Count - 1990
a so suggest providing service to this area.
B Walmart/Route 29 North
ere is presently a request to start bus service to Walmart.
e extension of bus service to the Walmart Shopping Center can
done in basically two ways. One is to extend the existing
ute 7, which presently serves Albemarle Square. The second is
create an entire new route. The first option would be the
st at this time. There is not sufficient demand to start an
tirely new route. The cost would be relatively the same
CTS would have to add a new bus for either the new route
o Route 7 to maintain headways. The extension of bus
s rvice to Walmart Shopping Center meets the criterion of major
a tivity centers (Walmart, Sam's) and level of service on
e isting roads. Route 29 will be below the accepted C level
d ring the near future construction. The provision of bus
rvice to this area is a way to reduce traffic congestion on
ute 29 during its reconstruction. The commuter potential for
rvice (see Attachment C) and lack of existing transit service
so makes Walmart a good candidate for bus service. The Walmart
rking lot meets CTS's turn-around space standards.
S aff recommends adding service to Walmart. CTS and the County
Panning Department have received numerous requests to add this
s rvice. By adding service to Walmart, riders on Route 7 will
g t improved service. It would also provide an opportunity for
8
p rk-ride services for areas to the north (Hollymead, Forest
L kes, etc.). Park and Ride possibilities have not been pursued
t date. It would be added to the most successful route in the
C unty, hence, it has a strong ridership pool.
C
Others (Colonnades, Branchlands, The Senior Center)
e Colonnades is located on Barracks Road. It is presently
rved by JAUNT and their own shuttle service. CTS has a bus
oute 9) that travels Barracks Road and Georgetown Road. The
lonnades is only.3 miles from the intersection of Georgetown
ad. If service is extended to Walmart, Route 7 would likely be
signated to Rio Hill Shopping Center and Walmart. Route 9,
ich presently serves Rio Hill Shopping Center, could then
corporate the Colonnades without negatively impacting present
ders. Many residents of the Colonnades qualify for para-
ansit. JAUNT is a demand-response service. CTS is a fixed
ute service. Staff and CTS believe that CTS service would not
tally eliminate demand for JAUNT. It is unlikely that present
UNT users would give up door-to-door service for a fixed route
rvice. CTS would have to conduct a survey to measure the
llingness of Colonnades residents to use CTS. It would be
fficult to compute realistic cost savings without this or some
pe of survey. Staff recommends if service is desired to the
lonnades, that the Colonnades and/or the County run a shuttle
existing CTS bus stops or transfer sites.
anchlands is located east of Hillsdale Road, and presently
rved by JAUNT, their own shuttle service and CTS within close
oximity. CTS has two bus stops that could serve Branchlands.
e first is located at the corner of Greenbrier and Hillsdale.
e second bus stop is located at Hillsdale and Holy Comforter
urch (behind Toys "R" Us). This stop is only .1 mile from the
in house in Branchlands Village via a short path. A field
sit with representatives from CTS indicates that CTS would not
able to physically enter the Branchlands Village to provide
-site service because of the geometrics of the main road.
aff feels Branchlands Village is presently receiving adequate
ansit service.
Senior Center is located at the corner of Greenbrier Drive
d Pepsi Place. It is directly across the street from an
isting CTS bus stop. CTS was approached by the Senior Center
ring its planning stage. The Senior Center is satisfied with
e service presently being offered.
Limitations and Cost
e estimated cost of starting a new route to Walmart and Pantops
uld be $75,000 for each route. There are several important
mitations that the County must take into consideration. The
9
is funding. If the County were to start new bus
any time over the next two fiscal years, the County
pay the estimated $75,000 per route minus farebox
runs about 15% to 20% ($11,000 - $15,000) of the
ross cost. CTS would base their cost to the County on a 20%
($15,000) farebox recovery rate for each new route. Therefore,
ach route would cost the County $60,000 per year. The County
cannot expect any state or federal assistance to off-set the
cost. Although the federal government has put more funding into
ransportation, the funding cycle will not allow state and local
overnments to realize that money for another two to three years.
nother consideration is equipment. CTS has not historically
charged the City or County for capital funding (i.e. - purchasing
f new buses). In view of current funding, CTS cannot guarantee
it will be able to cover the capital funding if new service were
started to Pantops and Walmart. Since the proposed new service
is initiated and located within the County, the County would have
to cover the cost of a new bus. CTS presently has sufficient
uses to meet its workload and bus schedule and could add one
ore route with the present fleet. If new service is added to
oth Walmart and Pantops, a new bus would have to be purchased.
Eighteen to twenty-four months are needed to purchase a new bus.
e estimated cost of a new bus is $200,000. The County can
e pect 50% to 90% in state and federal assistance. CTS personnel
uld have to investigate further if the County wants to start
s rvice to both Walmart and Pantops. CTS is not able at this
time to confirm if state and federal funding will be available.
C S would have to lease a bus in a short term until the new buses
are ready in order to begin bus service to Pantops and Walmart
i ediately. CTS estimates that it would cost $1,800 a month to
1 ase a bus. The County would have to off-set the cost of
1 asing the buses. CTS would pursue cost and obligations of
1 asing when directed by the County.
Alternative Funding
tailor merchant associations can off-set the cost of new route
paying for it with dues or contributions. CTS policy allows
r this type of agreement, but presently Barracks Road Shopping
nter, Seminole Square Shopping Center, Shoppers World Shopping
nter, Fashion Square Mall, Albemarle Square and Rio Hill
opping Center do not pay for the bus service they are
ceiving. The county--Can enter into an agreement with CTS and
eat Eastern which owns Pantops Shopping Center and/or with
lmart, but the County may have to request payment from the
her shopping centers in the County that have bus service to be
uitable.
10
V IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
cr~s budget cycle is July 1 July 30. If a new route or
e~pansion of a route is not included during the budget request
p~riod, it would be very difficult to add service in the middle
o the fiscal year. The difficulty of adding new service in
"tlid-stream" is partly attributed to the publication of schedules
a~d allocation of personnel.
C'~S must submit their budget to the City Council in mid-December.
T~ey must submit any new service request to CTS by the February
d~adline.
V. CONCLUSION
A County Recommendations on Evaluating Requests for Service
S aff recommends the following steps to accommodate all new
requests:
1
All requests should
Planning and Community
Planner's review.
be directed to
Development for
the Department of
the Transportation
2
The Department will evaluate the
following process:
request through the
A. Obtain comments/recommendation from CTS including
information on potential ridership and cost of service.
Comments from VDOT will also be obtained.
B. Obtain comments/recommendations from the MPO regarding
regional impact of proposed service.
C. Evaluate the request based on its consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and other County transportation and
human/public service policies/plans.
3
The Department will provide
Planning staff recommendations
Office.
CTS
to
and MPO
the County
comments and
Executive's
4 The County Executive's Office will then make recommendations
to the Board of Supervisors on the service request.
B Merchants/Citizen Input on New Service
REtail merchants and citizens requesting new or expanded bus
sErvice can contact the Department of Planning and Community
DEvelopment. If other departments or individuals receive
11
r~quests, they should be directed to the Department of Planning
a~d Community Development. Staff will use the existing criterion
e~tablished in the PPSTA report, the objectives and strategies of
tne Comprehensive Plan and any associated Neighborhood Plans in
cpnsidering public requests. The Department will work with CTS
in evaluating the feasibility of service. The recommendation
w~ll then be forwarded to the County Executive for budgetary
cpnsideration.
C. New Service Recommendations
1. Walmart Recommend service to Walmart at the cost of
$60,000 a year. Both staff and CTS consider this the
highest priority of the new requests. This service would be
added to the County's most successful route (Route 7) which
has a current ridership of over 200,000. Route 7 provides
access to the major activity centers in the County. Walmart
is a major retailer at the northern end of the Route 29
commercial corridor. Service to Walmart would be a logical
extension and enhancement of service provided by Route 7.
This request meets the criteria providing service to an
activity center, and level of service of existing roads.
Currently Route 29 functions at a level of service C, or
below Completion of improvements to Route 29 are not
anticipated for at least four years. Route 7 also meets a
number of characteristics identified under the socio-
economic characteristics (age of population -- serves the
Senior Center, Our Lady of Peace and Branchlands Retirement
Community; Population Density and income of the area
Route 7 is higher density areas and lower income
populations). CTS and staff believe new service will be
very successful.
2. Pantops - Recommend new service on a trial basis (one-year)
at a cost of $60,000 a year. This proposal meets the
criteria of providing service to a major activity center
(Pantops Shopping Center) and has the potential to serve
transit dependent populations (Westminster Cantebury and
future Winterhaven development through shuttle service).
However, unlike Route 7 which has had numerous stop within
the County, the Pantops service would be the only stop in
the County. Therefore, the potential to provide service to
other residential areas or activity centers is limited. As
development continues to occur in Neighborhood 3 there may
be a need to extend service beyond Pantops. Staff is
recommending trial service to determine the actual demand
for service and interest in expanded service.
3. Colonnades - New service not recommended at this time.
12
4. Senior Center - Bus service is adequate. No new service is
recommended.
5. Branchlands - Bus service is adequate. No new service.
13
[ATTACHMENT AI
~~
^'-o
&
00-
0<</
CHARLOTTES VILE
TRANSIT SYSTEM
AREA SYSTEM MAP
See single route
maps for detai I
o
UTS-CTS
TRANSFER POINT
GREENBRIER
BELMONT
HEIGHTS
FRY'S
SPRIN
JOHNSON
VILLAGE
PIEDMONT VA. .
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
BLUE RIDGE
HOSPITAL
!
I ATTACHMENT 8/
Level-of-service definitions - In general, the various
levels of service are defined as follows for uninterrupted
flow facilities:
Level-of-service A represents free flow. Individual
users area virtually unaffected by the presence of
others in the traffic stream. Freedom to select
desired speeds and to maneuver within the traffic
stream is extremely high. The general level of comfort
and convenience provided to the motorist, passenger, or
pedestrian is excellent. Little or no delay.
Level-of-service B is in the range of stable flow, but
the presence of other uses in the traffic 'stream begins
to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is
relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in
the freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream from
LOS A. The level of comforts and convenience provided
is somewhat less than at LOS A, because the presence of
others in the traffic stream begins to affect
individual behavior. Short traffic delays.
Level-of-service C is in the range of stable flow, but
marks the beginning of that range of flow in which the
operation of individual users becomes significantly
affected by interactions with others in the traffic
stream. The selection of speed is now affected by the
presence of others, and maneuvering within the traffic
stream requires substantial vigilance on the part of
the user. The general level of comfort and convenience
declines noticeably at this level. Average traffic
delays.
Level-of-service D represents high-density, but stable,
flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely
restricted, and the driver or pedestrian experiences a
generally poor level of comfort and convenience. Small
increases in traffic flow will generally cause
operational problems at this level. Long traffic
delays.
Level-of-service E represents operating conditions at
or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to
a low, but relatively uniform value. Freedom to
maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely
difficult, and it is generally accomplished by forcing
a vehicle or pedestrian to "give away" to accommodate
such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience levels are
extremely poor, and driver or pedestrian frustration is
generally high. Operations at this level are usually
unstable, because small increases in flow or minor
perturbations within the traffic stream will cause
breakdowns. Very long traffic delays.
Level-of-service F is used to define forced or
breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the
amount or traffic approaching a point exceeds the
amount which can traverse the point. Queues form
behind such locations. Operations within the queue are
characterized by stop-and-go waves, and they are
extremely unstable. Vehicles may progress at
reasonable speeds for several hundred feet or more,
then be required to stop in a cyclic fashion.
Level-of-service F is used to describe the operating
conditions within the queue, as well as the point of
the breakdown. It should be noted, however, that in
many cases operating condition of vehicles or
pedestrians discharged from the queue may be quite
good. Nevertheless, it is the point at which arrival
flow exceeds discharge flow which causes the queue to
form, at level-of-service F is an appropriate
designation for such points. Very long traffic delays.
IATTACHMENT CI
. Census Blocks With High Commuter Potential
~
I ATTACHMENT 0 I
Census Blocks Containing More Than Three Criteria
(indicating transit dependent population)
16-0ct-92
FTA REIMB~RSEMENT WORKSHEET
TIME PERIbD:
TOTAL E~P~NDITURES
$0.00
% BREAKDOWN
--------- ---------------------------------------------------
--------- -----------------------------------------------.-------
FARES
CHARTERS *
RENTALS*
OTHER-SER I'ICES*
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
ERR
ERR
ERR
ERR
--------- --------------------------------------------------
TOTAL REVtNUE $0.00 ERR
=========: ================================================-=
NET DEFIC T $0.00 ERR
FTA SHARE (50%)
FTA ROUNDGD
$0.00
$0.00
ERR
--------- --------------------------------------------------
LOCAL SHAl E: $0.00 ERR
VDOT FTM $0.00 ERR
VDOT ADMIN $0.00 ERR
ALBE~JARLE COUNT $0.00 ERR
ADVEITISING $0.00 ERH
UVA $0.00 ERR
CITY SHARE $0.00 ERR
============================================================
TOTAL $0.00 ERR
*CHARTERS, RENTALS AND SERVICES OPERATED ON
IBREAKEVEt" BASIS, THERE IS NO PROFIT
I ATTACHMENT E I
16-0ct-92
I ATTACHMENT F I
CHARLOTTESVILLE
STATE AID FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
FY-1993
FORMULA ASSISTANCE
MAXIMUM ELIGIBILITY CALCULATION
--------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
Total Eli< ible Fuels, Tires, and Maintenance Expenses
$0.00
Total Eli( ible Administrative Expenses
$0.00
Total Elic ible Ridesharing Expenses
$0.00
other Ope ating Expenses
$0.00
---------------
.. ._---~---------------
Total Ope ating Expenses
$0.00 (1)
Total RevEnue (farebox, advertising, etc.)
Total FedEral Operating Assistance
$0.00
$0.00
Total Sta1e and Local Funds Required
$0.00 (2)
---------------
-- -----------------
.al Incc me
$0.00 (1)
Max.
CategolY State % State $ Local $ Total $
--------------- ------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
FTM 95% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Administrc tive 50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Ridesharir g 80% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Other Opel ating -0- $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
---------------- --------------- ---------------
-+.._---_.~_._------- -- ----------------.-- ----------- -------
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 (2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Total income must equal total operating expenses
(2) Total state and local funds required must equal the matrix grand total
.
I ATTACHMENT GI
.~>
(i) Transfer Points
~
),'
.. /' ;~.~."
TO
17 ALBEMARLE SQUARE
TO
7 DOWNTOWN
VIA W MAIN, UNIVERSITY AVE., BARRACKS
RO D SHOPPING CENTER & K-MART
VIA FASHION SQUARE, BARRACKS ROAD
SHOPPING CENTER, UNIVERSITY AVE.
& W. MAIN
.
IATTACHMENT HI
M r r \.)( X #.../ $ ..~<t.
/ l-L~~ ^ y X '-"' ~
Arrows on the mop Incficote direction of travel. .i
Nwnben withil the arrows indicate ",inutes oft
... flour for scheduled stops.
-.:.~
I.
/
I
-------'"
\"
.,
f..
1/
I.
:\
Blut Hi/pt Hosp.
· {Iolftr por/illgloll
TO
8 GRE.ENBRIER
TO
VIA P RK STREET, MELBOURNE ROAD AND
YORKTOWN DRIVE
VIA PARK STREET, DOWNTOWN AND
MONTICELLO AVENUE
..
IATTACHMENT II
Arrows on the map indicate direction of travel.
Numbers within the arrOlWS indicate minutes after
the hour for scheduled stops,
\
(!) Transfer Points
TO
9 THE UNIVERSITY
@ U-HALL
VIA GE RGETOWN ROAD, WHITEWOOD
VILLAGE FOUR SEASONS AND RIO ROAD
VIA RIO ROAD, BERKMAR DRIVE, COMMON-
WEALTH DRIVE & WHITEWOOD VILLAGE
.
.
D~STR:::'UT::: T.) :'2/..:-~D d,f:.\\BEnS
, /{t 9-7'.3
or't~""""-"-~.~;,a..:,~,,,,,~
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA
Fiscal
Interim Report
AGENDA DATE:
February 3, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
9';) , os { e 'I (0
ACTION: ---I-
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
REVIEWED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
BACKG OUND:
The ttached report from the Fiscal Impact Committee provides information on the
commi tee's activities and discussions during the past six months.
The. c mmittee is also soliciting the Board's approval to proceed with a Request for
al for a Fiscal Impact Model.
you have any questions prior to the meeting, please do not hesitate to call me.
jbt
93.02
..
INTERIM REPORT
of the
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE
I recognition of the ongoing debate over the cost. of growtn om".
A bemarle County and the pressures fostered by the recession to
r examine the County's economic development policy, the Board of
S pervisors in early June 1992 appointed eleven members to a Fiscal
I pact Committee to develop a fiscal impact analysis methodology.
T e need for such a methodology was based on several factors;
o No mechanism currently exists wi thin the county to
measure the impact of growth on county revenues or
expenditures;
o An inability to tie specific land-use and development
decisions to the long-term financial health and service
needs of the county.
C GE
R cognizing these problems, the Board of Supervisors charged the
c mmittee with developing a fiscal impact analysis methodology that
w uld:
o Incorporate all planning and growth factors relevant to
Albemarle County's current and future growth policy;
o Be valid, creditable, and flexible;
o Be easily used and maintained by staff;
o Be fully supported and integrated with the comprehensive
plan review process.
MMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
e membership of the committee includes two members of the Board
Supervisors, two members of the Planning Commission, and seven
mbers from the community at large:
ard of Su ervisors
arlotte Humphris
rrest Marshall
Planninq Commission
william Nitchmann
Ellen Andersen
Community
Bruce Dotson
Peter Hallock
Blake Hurt
Tim Lindstrom
Jay McNeely
Dennis Rooker
Michael K. Seminak
ETINGS
e committee first met on June 29 and set a meeting schedule for
e 2nd and 4th Thursday of each month. Between summer vacations,
lidays, and speaker schedules, the committee met eleven times on
e following dates: 6/29, 7/16, 8/6, 8/20, 10/1,10/15,11/5,
/19, 12/3, 1/7 and 1/25.
.
A ter electing Bob Tucker, County Executive, as its non-voting
f cilitator, the committee members determined that the first order
o business was to gain a thorough understanding of the purposes,
a well as the specific components, ie. inputs and outputs, of a
f scal impact model. with this information, the committee could
t en address the pr imary question, whether the county needed a
f scal impact analysis model or whether a valid analysis of growth
a d development costs could be provided with current resources and
c rrent staff?
th this goal in mind, several briefings were held for the
on different fiscal impact analysis models:
16 92 Two representatives, Tom Mueller and Mike Siegel, from
e Government Finance Officers Research (GFOR) presented their
scal impact analysis model, currently being implemented by
udoun County. During the second half of the meeting, Randy
stin from the Impact Modeling Research Institute (IMTI) in
acksburg provided information on the specific model developed by
s company.
though time consuming, these briefings were helpful to committee
mbers unfamiliar with the mechanics of a fiscal impact model.
T ey provided the requisite background for an understanding of
f'scal impact analysis inputs and outputs, as well as the
i portance of consensus on the basic assumptions that drive the
c lculations.
20 92 Dr. John Knapp from the Center for Public Service
scussed the generic concept of fiscal impact analysis and the
lationship of a fiscal impact model to econometric models that
asure broader economic impacts at the regional, state and
tional levels.
1 92 Ms. Cynthia Richmond, Assistant Director of Research and
atistics for Loudoun County, spoke to the committee about
udoun's experience with the GFOR fiscal impact model. Much of
e discussion centered not so much on the model itself, but on
eir committee's difficulty in agreeing on the basic model
sumptions and inputs. From her experience, she feels that
bemarle has approached the problem correctly by planning for
mmunity input and consensus on the assumptions prior to the
rchase and development of the model.
1 5 92 Ms. Cynthia Richmond returned a second time to
d monstrate Loudoun's model to the committee on a video screen.
Mr. Paul Tischler, of Tischler and Associates of
Maryland, came to talk about his company's fiscal impact
del. A major difference between the GFOR and the Tischler model
that Tischler uses a marginal case-study approach, while the
udoun County model is based on the average cost approach.
SCUSSIONS
addition to technical knowledge, the committee's discussions
ntered around five major issues:
If a fiscal impact model is implemented in the county, it
ould not dictate pOlicy, but should be used only as one tool in
king informed decisions. People, i.e., supervisors,
mmissioners, staff, management, the community, can utilize the
utral information the model provides, but other factors, often
quantifiable, must also be weighed before policy decisions are
de. For example, a fiscal impact analysis could not tell the
unty how to implement an affordable housing program. What it
uld do is provide the fiscal impact on the county of a specific
ogram proposal. It would also allow the testing of various
enarios to determine the best or least expensive option.
All parties in the community must agree on the assumptions
tered into the model. without this consensus or agreement, any
tputs or conclusions of the model will be unacceptable and
eless. Learning from the Loudoun experience, the committee
cognizes the importance and necessity of this part of the
ocess. If the Board concurs, one of the next steps for the
mmittee will be to determine and agree upon these inputs and
sumptions.
The committee debated how inclusive a fiscal impact analysis
del should be. Part of the committee felt that the fiscal impact
del should do precisely what the term "fiscal impact" defines,
e., measure the fiscal impact of growth and development on county
venues and expenditures. The opposing viewpoint suggests that
e model should also be able to measure the impact of government
gulations or growth policies on the economy or on the economic
nefit/detriment to the people.
sic fiscal impact models measure the dollar impact of growth,
velopment and land use decisions on county government. The
fficulty and/or expense of measuring other regulatory or economic
pacts, which may include environmental, aesthetic, or equity
sues, is not clear at this time. The feasibility of adding these
mponents to a basic model will be pursued through the RFP
ocess.
A fiscal impact model should not be a "black box", ie. it
ould not contain unknown logarithms or formulas based on national
regional databases. It should be transparent and understandable
all users, and based strictly on local data. Formulas known
ly to the consultants, the black box, are unacceptable to the
mmittee and would always be a source of contention and
ntroversy.
In discussing fiscal impact models, it became obvious to the
mmittee that this type of fiscal analysis spreadsheet is an
fective budgeting and forecasting tool, as well as an adjunct to
nd use decisions. Fiscal impact models are able to tie changing
, ..
NCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
sed on our research and discussions over the past six months, the
mmittee's conclusion and recommendation to the Board of
pervisors is to proceed with a Request for Proposal for a fiscal
i pact model. The proposed RFP would solicit bids for a basic
f'scal impact analysis model, as well as an added component to look
a the impact of regulations or development policies on the
e onomic community. By adding this component to the RFP over and
a ove the basic model, the committee will know from the responses
wether the regulatory environment can be measured by an expanded
m del and/or whether the cost of the additional component is
a fordable.
mographic, as well as specific development projects, to the
quisi te capital and service level needs. Since linking the
mprehensive plan and the capital facility plan to the County's
erating budget has been an ongoing goal, this type of model would
ford that capability.
e committee submits this interim report as an update on our work
t us far and as a request for guidance for the committee's future
d'rection. If the Board of Supervisors concurs with our
c nclusions, the committee will proceed to draft an RFP for a
f'scal impact model.
Edward H Bain. Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scollsvdl('
David P Bow rman
Charlottesvil1
Charles S, Martin
RiviH1IM
Charlotte Y Humphns
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
WhilE' Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC e20C-
DATE: February 4, 1993
S Board Actions of February 3, 1993
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on February 3, 1993, the Board took
following action:
enda Item No. 17a. Appropriation: Transfer of funds from Greenwood
mmunity Center to Mint Springs. APPROVED the attached appropriation to
ansfer funds in the amount of $4,900.00 from Greenwood Community Center to
nt Springs. (Form #920037)
enda Item No. 17b. Appropriation: Adjustment to School Board Reserve based
actual June 30, 1992, Fund Balance. APPROVED the attached appropriation of
5,857.57 to adjust to School Board reserve based on actual June 30, 1992
nd balance. (Form #920035)
enda Item No. 17c. Appropriation: Additional Funding for CATEC. APPROVED
e attached reappropriation of $48,108 from FY 1991-92 carryover funds.
orm #920036)
end a Item No 17d. Appropriation: Walnut Creek Park Nature Trail. APPROVED
e attached appropriating of $3,375.92 to transfer funds from Chris Greene to
lnut Creek Park for a Nature Trail. (Form #920039)
enda Item No. 17e. Appropriation: Additional approved positions in Social
rvices. APPROVED the attached appropriation of $10,250.00 to transfer funds
om the Board of Supervisors contingency to fund additional approved posi-
ons in Social Services. (Form #920040)
enda Item No. 17f. Appropriation: Teen Center. APPROVED the attached
$11,860.00 to fund the Charlottesville/Albemarle Teen Center.
tachments
Tracy Holt
Richard Huff, III
Patrick Mullaney
Robert W.Paskel
Kathy Ralston
Roxanne White
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FIS
YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920037
TYP OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADV RTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
CAPITAL
P
T
OSE OF APPROPRIATION:
SFER OF FUNDS FROM GREENWOOD TO MINT SPRINGS.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
71000950080 P&R-SWIM AREAL IMPROVEMENT $4,900.00
71000950027 GREENWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER (4,900.00)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
******************************************************************
TING COST CENTER:
PARKS & RECREATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
~.~ ~~~/-
Lffi? //a !f,1//;)U1;;
{
/- /r-9Y
,~ ->'J-93
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920035
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADV TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
FUND
SCHOOL
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
TMENT TO SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE BASED ON ACTUAL JUNE 30, 1992
BALANCE
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
61101580000 SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE ($15,857.57)
TOTAL
($15,857.57)
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2200 51000510100 SCHOOL FUND BALANCE ($15,857.57)
TOTAL
($15,857.57)
************************************************************************
COST CENTER:
FINANCE
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
/-/2-?3
~~7 _ ~! _ q:-~
(.../'.. , /-/
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FIS 92/93
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
NUMBER 920036
TYP OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
FUND
SCHOOL
APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR CATEC.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
61103701100 CATEC-LOCAL $48,108.00
61101580000
SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE
(48,108.00)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
*******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
SCHOOL
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
#~'4:l fid~&,~
~lfL );V(lfl 1_''1'
/-/~-7.>
c2 -~9 -93
BO
OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC~L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920039
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADVE~TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
CAPITAL
PURP~~SE OF APPROPRIATION:
TRAN~FER OF FUND FROM CHRIS GREENE TO WALNUT CREEK PARK FOR NATURE TRAIL
~XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
1900lD71001800605 WALNUT CREEK PARK-NATURE TRAIL $3,375.92
19001 71000950078
CHRIS GREENE LAKE-ENTRANCE BOOTH
(3,375.92)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
*****~******************************************************************
REQUE$TING COST CENTER:
APPROVALS:
PARKS & RECREATION
DIRECrOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~/-. . ~ ~_.~~
~\} . '}
c;r,r!/-t X-, f.4J/j
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
/ -25"-7'3
-? - t'./_ :1.;:<
tX / ~
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
ADV RTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
92/93
NUMBER 920040
OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
YES
NO X
GENERAL
POSE OF APPROPRIATION:
T SFER OF FUND FROM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTINGENCY TO FUND
ADDITIONAL APPROVED POSITIONS IN SOCIAL SERVICES.
EXPENDITURE
COS CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100053012110000 SOC. SER.-SALARIES $8,700.00
1100053012210000 SOC. SER.-FICA 665.00
1100053012221000 SOC. SER.-VRS 885.00
1100011010999902 B.O.S.-CONTINGENCY (10,250.00)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
*******************************************************************
STING COST CENTER:
SOCIAL SERVICES
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
~~~~--~"--
/$/j,z ]U (~~J
/- ~ -?...3
c2 -~?-f3
BO
OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920041
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADV TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
FUND
TEEN CENTER
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
1421 71017110000 COMPENSATION-REGULAR $8,020.00
1421 71017210000 FICA 575.00
1421 71017221000 VSRS 695.00
1421 71017231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 550.00
1421 71017232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 25.00
1421 71017241000 LIFE INSURANCE 70.00
1421 71017270000 WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION 150.00
1421 71017311000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 675.00
1421 71017580505 SECURITY SERVICES 900.00
1421 71017600200 FOOD SERVICE SUPPLIES 200.00
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
/93 FUNDING OF JOINT TEEN CENTER.
TOTAL
$11,860.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2421016000160503 COUNTY OF ALBEMARE $5,930.00
2421016000160502 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE 5,930.00
TOTAL
$11,860.00
******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
PARKS & RECREATION
OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~L.d~
~)Zf ;?r/rrd1
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
/-..:J 11'-)'3
cx?- 5/- Y!3
ee' " ni OF
)t. .
v..,',.,.....,...,,;:.,!' /- ;:;q-9~
~e;1da irem~N,J. !J..!.~~
,l!l:t\.! ~ ~ iqCn
!:i
:-\:;=_CL)r;\.~E C:fFiC;'E
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Parks and Recreation Department
County Office Building
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5844
MEMORANDUM
Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
Patrick K. Mullaney, Director of Parks and Recreationf11ftJ
January 12, 1993
Request for Transfer of Capital Funds
We are currently finishing up the beach expansion project at
Springs.
The only two items remaining are the installation of 200 ft.
fence with a gate around the new beach area, and a bridge that
r park crews will be building over the feeder stream linking the
w beach with the old. At this point we have exhausted the
nding in the project code. The remaining work will cost
proximately $4,700.
During the course of this project we experienced some
s'gnificant expenses that could not be anticipated. As you may
r member when we initiated this project, the gate valve on the
r"ser broke in the closed position. This required the rental of
p ps and exhaust pipes to pump the lake down to the level of the
b-eak, which happened to be all the way at the bottom of the lake.
S"nce we could not find enough exhaust pipe to reach the second
1 ke, we experienced some erosion damage to the dam from the pumped
ter. The total cost of pump rental, ga te valve repair and
osion repair was approximately $7,500. The original budget for
e beach expansion project was $29,300.
In order to complete the project, I would like to request that
e Board of Supervisors authorize the transfer of the unexpended
lance of $4,900 from the Greenwood Community Center baseball
eld project code to the Mint Spring project code. The $4,900 is
ft over from the original appropriation of $7,500 to replace the
tfield fence at Greenwood and clear and grade the slope behind
That project has been completed.
for Transfer of Capital Funds
By copy of this memo, I am advising Melvin Breeden of this
r quest. The particular project codes involved are 1 9000 71000
950027 Greenwood Community Center, and 1 9000 71000 950080 P&R -
S im Area Improvement.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need any
a ditional information.
Isms
Melvin Breeden
.0
..
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920037
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
CAPITAL
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
FER OF FUNDS FROM GREENWOOD TO MINT SPRINGS.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
71000950080 P&R-SWIM AREAL IMPROVEMENT $4,900.00
71000950027 GREENWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER (4,900.00)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
*******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
PARKS & RECREATION
OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~~.#~~dh-
DATE
/- /r-~Y
BO
OF SUPERVISORS
'It
lV."."" ~ .LCJ... q -C;cf
-",;,<. ,It}
"".,,,~!, "J. t/."JcJ._-J.03,ya
..."...;.11<1 ,tern ,~ . _.___.__
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance.~/Sb
January 13, 1993
Appropriations
Attached are two School Fund appropriations which require
ard action.
On November 4, 1992 the Board approved the reappropriation of
e entire School Fund balance for teacher bonuses and the School
ard reserve. Based on the final audit adjustments, the actual
lance is $15,857.57 less than projected at that time. This
duction results primarily from inventory adjustments.
propriation #920035 reduces the appropriation to the School Board
serve by $15,857.57 to eliminate the negative fund balance.
In October 1992 the School Board approved and requested that
8,108 of their carryover balance be appropriated to increase the
cal contribution to CATEC. Since the entire carryover balance
s appropriated to the School Board reserve, Appropriation #920036
11 authorize the transfer of funds from the School Board reserve
CATEC.
BIbs
A tachments
COI 'NTY OF AU3EMi\FiU:.
...~~t. _......"7,_~f;i_"
l!l, ,\1 .~ () 1(\0")
.;(f
EXLcunv.:: vtriCe:
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCj\L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920035
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADVE~TISEMENT REQUIRED?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPIPSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADJUSTMENT TO SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE BASED ON ACTUAL JUNE 30, 1992
FUND BALANCE
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
1241D61101580000 SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE ($15,857.57)
TOTAL
($15,857.57)
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
2200D51000510100 SCHOOL FUND BALANCE ($15,857.57)
TOTAL
($15,857.57)
****~*******************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
APPRIPVALS:
DIRE~OR OF FINANCE
BOARII> OF SUPERVISORS
FINANCE
SIGNATURE
DATE
~e-L' /? AZ,..-/! -
/-/2-1.$
ld:" !tem fio.
..I::2J:2J:.
C:;.iS- 002 0 J. ye;
.,_,_ _.._"..~_..o>__......__, _....._ /
..
.
(,:,{.~~ -;~~_.: <c.
ALBEMARLE COUNlY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
DAtE:
TO~
FR~M:
I
REf
I
I
I
I
I
I
I At its April 6, 1992 meeting, the School Board authorized an
ad itional allocation of $48,108 to the Albemarle County share of
fu ding for CATEC for 1992-93. The state revenue for jointly
op rated vocational/technical centers in Virginia was reduced in
th 1991-92 fiscal year and has been eliminated for the 1992-93
fi cal year. The Joint Committee for the Control of CATEC is
re esting the two School Boards replace the reduced State
re enue of $68,726 for 1992-93. The Albemarle county share is
ap roximately $48,108. Adding revenue for the 1992-93 fiscal
ye r would enable the Joint Committee to fund a portion of the
eq ipment needs without reducing programs.
October 8, 1992
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Robert W. Paskel, Division superintendent~~
Additional Revenue of CATEC from the FY1991-92
Carryover Funds
I
I It is requested that the Board of Supervisors approve the
retppropriation of $48,108 from FY1991-92 carryover funds.
RWf/smm
xci Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
Lettie Neher
Tracy Holt
,
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC~L YEAR 92/93
TYPEI OF APPROPRIATION
!
!
I
i
I
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
!
I
!
!
I
FUND!
I
!
PURP SE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDI IONAL FUNDING FOR CATEC.
NUMBER
920036
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
YES
NO X
SCHOOL
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
61103701100 CATEC-LOCAL $48,108.00
1241~61101580000
SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE
(48,108.00)
TOTAL $0.00
I REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****,*******************************************************************
!
!
I
!
!
I
I TOTAL $0.00
****~*******************************************************************
I
REQU~STING COST CENTER: SCHOOL
APPR VALS: SIGNATURE DATE
OF FINANCE
~~'"fl~^A~
/-/.;l-?3
BO
OF SUPERVISORS
.
\.r~,"r':"'rc(, i~ ,.~.-,".;;, j'-c3..i-9. :l
".' ":.J'_'~'.... '"..... . ";.J";:Ji:..i . ;:J
fo:g;~nd.~ lkm rJ~, _,~~, .~:i~~,~u
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Parks and Recreation Department
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5844
MEMORANDUM
~: Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
I
I
F10M:
I
I
DtTE: January 15, 1993
I
~:
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
: Enclosed please find a request for financial assistance from the Cove
I
G~rden Ruritan Club, which has been working to develop a trail system at Walnut
Cteek.
I
I
I
: We have an understanding with the Club that if they provide the manpower,
w~ will supply the materials for developing the trails. Unfortunately, they have
hit a section of trail that will require a larger piece of equipment than either
w~ or the Club members possess. The cost estimate for hiring a contractor is
e~timated at $3,000 to $4,000.
I
I
: We have had to make several unanticipated expenditures out of our 92-93
operating budget, and do not feel comfortable with funding this request from that
squrce. Therefore, I would like to request that the Board of Supervisors
aRpropriate the balance of $3,375.92 in Capital Improvements Code, 1 9000 71000
950078 - Chris Greene Entrance Booth, for this purpose. These funds are
r~maining from the project in which we replaced the ticket booths at Chris Greene
aqd Mint Springs. We had intended to use these funds to run electric to the
bdoths, but the cost of doing so well exceeds the funds available.
I
Patrick K. Mullaney, Director of Parks and Recreation Y1ll"ftl
Request for Transfer of Appropriation
Walnut Creek Nature Trail
It is my recommendation to use these funds for this purpose now so that the
Cdve Garden Ruritans can continue their work. We will reevaluate the 'ticket
bqoth electrical work, and if necessary, make a new request in a future CIP. If
yqu concur, 1 would appreciate your placing this item on the Board's agenda. If
I :need to provide any additional information, please let me know.
I
PKlM/sms
Enk:losure
cc:: Melvin Breeden
: Will Rieley
C=~~Ji' ('.f:" fl ~ ~~~~I\~L&
;t.
;
f.
, ,IAN ~~ 1
i
__ . ),~ L". IV":'
.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920039
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
CAPITAL
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
FER OF FUND FROM CHRIS GREENE TO WALNUT CREEK PARK FOR NATURE TRAIL
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
71001800605 WALNUT CREEK PARK-NATURE TRAIL $3,375.92
71000950078
CHRIS GREENE LAKE-ENTRANCE BOOTH
(3,375.92)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
*******************************************************************
STING COST CENTER:
PARKS & RECREATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
/ -::ZS- - ?3
OF FINANCE
~e/-+-' /? ~....~~
BO OF SUPERVISORS
..
..
Cove Garden Ruritan
P.O. Box 1 51
North Garden, VA 22959
January 12, 1993
r. Pat Mullaney, Director
eptartment of Parks and Recreation
ounty Office Building
00 McIntire Road
harlottesville, VA 22901
As you know, the Cove Garden Ruritan Club has been working to develop the first
s gment of what we hope will eventually become an extensive trail system at Walnut Creek
ark. Our members have contributed more than 100 man-hours toward the initial clearing
~ r the trail. (This is in addition to the time donated toward the stabilization of the Coleman
ouse.) Because the beginning of the trail is along a slope which requires some grading,
d because there are stumps in the trail-bed which must be mechanically removed, we have
~ und that some mechanized equipment will be needed to supplement our hand labor. Early
t is fall, the County's maintenance crew offered to help with the small back-hoe which the
ounty owns. Because of the slope and the size of the equipment it was determined that this
as not a feasible approach.
After talking with several operators and contractors, I met with Jack Sanford, of
aulkner Construction, the firm which built the dam. Jack felt that his outfit had the right
e uipment to do the job efficiently, and with the least impact to the surrounding woods. He
~ It that we should allow for 40 to 50 hours at $75/per hour, or about $3,000 to $4,000 for
t is work. This would include opening up the trail and disposing of the stumps in a mutually
a reeable location. Once the route is passable, we would bring a chipper and farm tractor in
t remove the fallen trees and brush. Faulconer would then do the final dressing up before
e do the final hand grading, seeding and apply the stone dust surface.
Our original agreement was that the Club would donate manpower and the County
ould provide materials; however, if the County can assume the cost of this mechanical
uipment, it will make our efforts much more effective. As you know, we hope that this
first section of trail will be easily accessible to older citizens and children, as well as those
ith disabilities. Once this segment is in place, many of the following trails may be much
ore rustic and rugged, and would not require this kind of mechanical equipment for
c nstruction.
.
..
...
r. Mullaney
P ge 2
I know that County funds are very tight, and if you cannot help with this work at this
e, we will understand, and will do the best we can with the resources available. We
th k you for your enthusiastic support of our efforts in the past, and we look forward to
w rlong with you over the coming years to help make Walnut Creek Park an even greater
r source for the residents of Albemarle County.
.
__:'1 ;
,'''':''':::: '-"f
/ "', ......
_:,::- ..)G__
..... -! . -..'
~~'-~---,-
;_'.lTl ~~ : -l -::
.- ~-- -, -. - -
; -
--~'-~----
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Social Services
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
PH. (804) 972-4010
TOO (804) 972-4012
FAX (804) 972-4060
c~.: ~v;: (.
~,] .~\ L::"'l
l':":'~ .)
.;..,' ::; .":.._i '~i ~_
.::- J,\tJJI-
.__ '.-.: '=: S
:.....;.:-
~
: ::__:,:- E
, ;_.~ (~i ~ (-.:\ - ;..::. ,.-
......;..- ............. .~ .-'. -.
-;'. y..:)
)
:.c', ._... ._:e.:':. 'J"'/ ~-
J ~
::1. V>;' :~',
) . ~
0...1'.:. f-:
~~... ~_ Cr ~_O ~~ ___ ~_
..:: ... :-...... C}~-l
11-1 'J
-' -. - J
-- '/Ii ;~~ j~ "S e i:"~
;-: '! ,.-.,
~. '- ~ C __ ,u. -.:... \...) L- j~ ~ 'V e rn
-=. 2:;' ~.:' '--,~ ::t 0 ;,' ~ 'd" ~" f.::
c
c):n
/()/ ;? G~:...)
e::: ~.-. ~
.- ~l r:. E:
::::: 1 i -~-lC.:
\...... '"i,'''';''
~;._~ .:'tr:.e::.:
-'. )", ,-~
: ,:-ll_;
;:_~ C 1 ,.,~, Ci ,~~
.._.. _ _. j _..t. .,.' _
2.. Y
/ _/~:),o,c.;::J / ,r' /')/ C'".J 9''P ,?..9 c.) 2
i..,.
.::
J, ;
.L.G ~
1 ~ {;".
,.:1. e
... () r:-:~
__ _ __11'::1 .-:-....
b05
J- d9 ?"
f/'.j, () ;20 Ij ,S- /
~ fb (~ It r : II !~
IJU
JAN 261993
i-U
I,
I;
; i:J
OEPT. OF Fh'jANCE
w
"-i~'- r
~.... s
.3. ~::~
'tV
~ -- ':-'
',I} t.
,__,"':':. .-:-.'-;.~=;e:.-
t'! ",,'''::''
u (~L. c_
;:.,
'(p);'=:
;,.'b(':
CO~Jr'~~'l-~'l OF ~j
.
. r\ \t
.~ /~
~ ...;.
T00"'
i~
,E>~;:-~L U -f 1 \, .~:.
, .;' ~
......, l . ~ "~--......
..' .,
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC~L YEAR 92/93
I
I
TYPE I OF APPROPRIATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
ADVErTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
NUMBER
920040
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
YES
NO X
FUND
GENERAL
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
FER OF FUND FROM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTINGENCY TO FUND
IONAL APPROVED POSITIONS IN SOCIAL SERVICES.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
53012110000 SOC. SER.-SALARIES $8,700.00
53012210000 soc. SER.-FICA 665.00
53012221000 SOC. SER.-VRS 885.00
11010999902 B.O.S.-CONTINGENCY (10,250.00)
TOTAL
$0.00
I REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****f*******************************************************************
I
I TOTAL $0.00
****+*******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
SOCIAL SERVICES
SIGNATURE
DATE
OR OF FINANCE
~~A7~...-p1~
,
/- ~ -?...3
BO
OF SUPERVISORS
.r
~
/ -;2- ~l- 9'.;3.-' ,'Cd
;_,"..J~ ~)
."-~'.~._' ^_.""...,~......._,..;~.......
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA T
Appropri
Teen Center Fund
AGENDA DATE:
February 3, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
<--/ .3 ,{):;2 03. ~ d--
SUBJECT
Appropri
Albemarl
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
Fund
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: ~
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes ( 1)
/J o--~
REVIEWED BY: /t:/I1/ I
OUND:
may remember, the Board appropriated $5,930 at the December 16 meeting to
's share of the Albemarle/Charlottesville Teen Center through June 1993.
rly appropriated $5,930 at their meeting on January 16.
fund the
The City
the County will be responsible for administering the program, a separate. fund
r to Rivanna Park has been set up for City and County funds, as well as other future
e sources. As fiscal agent for the total fund, the County must appropriate its own
er share, as well as the City's share for a total appropriation of $11,860.
RECO
Staff
approval of the attached appropriation form.
/bt
93.01
c: P trick K. Mullaney, Director, Parks and Recreation Department
.. ~ APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC LYEAR 92/93 NUMBER 920041
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES
NO X
FUND TEEN CENTER
PURP SE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 9 /93 FUNDING OF JOINT TEEN CENTER.
XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
1421 71017110000 COMPENSATION-REGULAR $8,020.00
1421 71017210000 FICA 575.00
1421 71017221000 VSRS 695.00
1421 71017231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 550.00
1421 71017232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 25.00
1421 71017241000 LIFE INSURANCE 70.00
1421 71017270000 WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION 150.00
1421 71017311000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 675.00
1421 71017580505 SECURITY SERVICES 900.00
1421 71017600200 FOOD SERVICE SUPPLIES 200.00
TOTAL
$11,860.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2421 16000160503 COUNTY OF ALBEMARE $5,930.00
2421 16000160502 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE 5,930.00
TOTAL
$11,860.00
*******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
PARKS & RECREATION
FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~~'d~
DATE
/ -.;::1 "j/ -.? .3
BO
OF SUPERVISORS
MOTION: Mr. Bain
SECOND: Mrs. Humphris
MEETING DATE: February 3, 1993
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has
convened an executi ve meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 and 2.1-344.A.7 of the Code
of Virginia requires a certification by the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors that such executive meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.
VOTE:
AYES: Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin,
Perkins and Bain.
NAYS: None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE: None.
ABSENT DURING MEETING: None.
/,
.....----~ ' \,...f:!\, , '" . t
Deputy Clerk,
CQunty Board of
/j
" ,;:.. (l
Albemarle
Supervisors
",-," ,
.- ~
Edward H Ram. Jr
S<'Hnuei Mill('
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901A596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972A060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
ScottsvllIe
DavId P Bow rman
Charlottesvill
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y H mphris
Jilek Jouett
Walter F Perkms
Whilt:' liall
February. 8, 1993
M . Stephen C. Ayers
2 80 Cove Trace
C arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Ayers:
D
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February 3,
1 93, you were appointed to the Joint Airport Commission with a
t rm to expire on December 1, 1995.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
willingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
t?)~b~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DP /jnh
CC Bryan Elliott, Director of Aviation
Jeanne Cox, Clerk of Council
James L. Camblos, III, Commonwealth's Attorney
.."..- ~
,
Edward H. Bin. Jr
Samuel Mil r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bo erman
Charlottesvi Ie
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
January 19, 1993
Stephen C. Ayers
o Cove Trace
rlottesville, VA 22901
r Mr. Ayers:
This letter is to inform you that you have been scheduled
an interviw with the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on
nesday, February 3, 1993, at 1:10 p.m., for the Joint Airport
ission. The interview will be held on the fourth floor of
County Office Building.
Since we have been unable to contact you by telephone,
ase call 296-5843 by January 27, 1993 to confirm that this
e is convenient.
Sincerely,
&~(]'tR-e;f!/
/Ella W. Carey !
Clerk, CMC ;
EW /jnh
*
Printed on recycled paper
~ ,--
~ l
Coun ty uf ! -bcmarlc
,
App licant' s
Office 0 Board of County Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Chnl')ttesvilleA, V A 229024596
(804) ,96.5843
APPLICATION TO SERV ~ ON BOARD I COMMISSION I COMMITI'EE
(please type oq)rillt)
mission / Committee JOil~~_. Aicrpor Comrni~r:sion
Stephen C. Ayers
Home Phone 804/973-3436
'S 2980.~ov@ 't'r<'J.ce; Ch.u'lotte .ville, Virgini~ 22901,
Magisterial istrict in which your home residence i located
Employer ,_,co~di.~l .___ Phone 1104/970-2514
1180 seminole ,Trail, Ro 77.66. CtlFlrl nttesvi He YA.1;qinia 22906
Date of Em loyment ~_2:988 OCCll ,ation / Title Y_~9_~ prosident, Sales & Marketing
....B.2.Qrd
4
Previous Residence BJacksburg, Virginia
Number of Children
2
Education ( egrees and Graduation Dates) ASSOC ate -!.n Applied Science, Np-w River. Commun ity College
Education S~Udies
.social Groups
American Telc-mo ~.!m.iCi'lt.i.nns 1\ssociation( Member-First Ch,irch of God,
for the Society o. ~ngineering Technicians
:tivities or Interests
find RAl'lc::UI'! sq1..l.;l.c1, have held positions with VA StO:lte
asoc1ation (editor~; W~stern VA Emergency Medi~al Services Council (Bd of Drctrs)
communicatio officers: l1p-signed 911 aystem for Town of Blacksburg.
t
mn ssion I Committee
1. Ever One should RArVe ;md c:xmtrih te to the improvement of their community.
/.. A.s a VERY frQql,lent flyer, I would be able to make ~ure Charlot.tesvi lle Airport would be
camp titive nationally as this is the "front door" for ma.ny who visit. our cOll\l1'lunity.
The informa ion provided on this applicaf
December 2~1992
Date
Return to : Lettie E. Nehe~J Clerk, Board or Cc unty Supervisor!!
Albemarle COllllty .
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902<4596
~oo If]
lVIGWm
€6~~ 9L6 v09S
gv:SI
Z6/ZZ/l I
.. -_......,',"'......-~.....'._----
<ro: 9{pme~fhe ~', n~~j~~/Lttll4
Company. f3cw1ci D(y &wzt;t.J&p.l1()L~
Ci,ty em ;~urth..!1/lu:-i4
'1Jate D ('_ 22-; jqqJ
(:GMDIAL
Made [jglJ,t in the USA
fJinu
!T~9(um~er
( ) 9rx-l-40G, 0
# of Copu s to !Fo{kJw Cover I
!F9{O!M:
I
9{gme 0* phQ.n C, (llfJJs
tTefepfwne ~m6er Ql i - :.1.5 11
'Ja~9\Lum ;eT (804)978.2293
.9laaiti.ona (' Comments:
i".....,
1 00 !fJ
~BZZ RJ.R p.Og~ gp.; GI ZFVZz/ZT
lVIowm
~. .
.
Edward H. Bal . Jr
Samuei Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
r-orrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsvdle
David P. Bowe man
Charlottesville
Charles S Martin
Rivannd
Charlotte Y H mphris
Jack Jouetl
Walter F Perkms
White Hall
February 8, 1993
M . Arthur B. Brown, Jr.
5 0 Manor Road
E rlysville, VA 22936
D ar Mr. D:rowu: ~6
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February 3,
1 93, you were appointed to the Community Services Board (Region
T n) with a term to expire on June 30, 1995.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
--)
~...~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
c James Peterson, Executive Director
James L. Camblos, III, Commonwealth's Attorney
.. "
.....
~~~ OF
(jOV
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA ZZ901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
dress 5'-/0 MaNco< RJ ) E)r:i~J/i ilf', VA 22.q~
Magist rial District in which your home residence is located Wc,cd bRcc k
s Address k+e. lbc fQr )1~1i" J Je.) Vq, Phone 97t.f-S I J 5
C-' A \ CRed.+.;.. IN
:J ;'eMe"'S EN~"31 ~ li4-lCMO,4,'<l/).l -rrJc Occupation/Title O,Jlec:t,'ol.Js/1 8"
Empioyment DeceMb..ei!. I Cl IQ71.( Birthdate/Place loft/n. / 1I1J1crFotD) C+.
) (s,,,,~ 19f:!'3) I
Years esident of Albemarle County 9.+ Previous Residence '~/kN~ Cf.
Spouse s Name KIlt1/Cu.s,.J <i31ZC~J'" Number of Children if
Educat on (Degrees ari~ Graduation Dates) '.
ommission/Commi ttee ::r c; /J'!
nt's Name A R"Th1o\ r ("A f3 .)
A;'p.. f~ftT
13 13RGw,J
J
CCMM. ss;o,.J
Board/
Applic
.:1'~
'Bcd dw ,J
Member hips in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
. crLolJJ C \-ec,l-; c" I MaMA.cc/(,t(t'f) Ct<"d.f G't.o'lf" of NflC H
Public Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
jIA.,+it'e.
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee
Wo.-d j ).. h1 c b~ NO(l'<. iNVo I Ill! J
C (:"\.', de s
A-rJ d!.2/. I r':. J!vJeiert,NS.
, ,
The information provided on this application will be released to the
public upon request.
~i3~Y\II
~ SIGNATVRE
J~//9~
, DATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
!foOl McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229Q1r4596
Phone:
296-5843
#.
,~._..-......~.."" :' ....;..,.....
.:.-
Edward H. Bin, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlotlesvi Ie
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
December 28, 1992
M . Arthur B. Brown, Jr.
5 0 Manor Road
C arlo~t2sville, VA 22901
I
I
Dfar Applican~:
y~ur comple~ed application form has been received and attached is
a flow-chart outlining ~he appointmen~ process for all Boards and
C mmissions and a fact sheet on ~he Board or Commission for which
y u are applying. We appreicate your willingness to serve on the
J int Air ort Commission.
A~ter the above closina date, your application will be
d~stributed to the Board members for their reviewj for a
rn~gisterial district appointment your application will be
f rwarded only to the supervisor of your district. Depending on
t e position and the number of applicants, the Board will decide
wether to interview qualified candidates. If you are selected
f r an interview, you will be notified approximately two to three
w eks after the application closing date. You will also be
n tified at approximately the same time if you are not selected
f r an interview.
though it is not always possible, due to the Board's meeting
hedules, or the schedule of individual members, the Board
tempts to schedule interviews within 45 days and to make the
tual appointment within 60 days of the application deadline.
you have any questions on the status of your application
ring that time period, please do not hesitate to call this
fice.
Sincerely,
~/@
Lettie E~ Neher, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
tachments
*
Printed on recycled paper
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S Marlin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
January 19, 1993
M . Arthur B. Brown, Jr.
5 0 Manor Road
E rlysville, VA 22936
D
Mr. Brown:
This letter is to confirm that you have an interview with
t e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, February
3 1993, at 1:40 p.m., for the Joint Airport Commission. The
i terview will be held on the fourth floor of the County Office
B ilding.
If you have any questions, please contact our office at
2 6-5843.
Sincerely,
C~I f) n h/{'1 ')
(AX..Q ~~ ' MV /..
Ella W. Carey ,
Clerk, CMC 0
E C/jnh
*
Printed on recycled paper
..
_.
Edward H. Bal . Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
h)rr<!st R, Marshall. ,Jr
Scotlsville
David P Bowe an
Charlottesville
Charles::; Martin
Rivilnnil.
Charlotte Y H mphris
Jack Jouett
\,lJalter F Perkins
White Hil.1I
February 8, 1993
M . Bruce W. Kirtley
R ute 1, Box 405
C ozet, Va 22932
D
Mr. Kirtley:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February 3,
1 93, you were appointed to the Thomas Jefferson Housing
I provements Corporation with a term to expire on December 31,
1 95.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w'llingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
/7J - /Yd
{/~./~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D
Nancy O'Brien, Executive Director
James L. Camblos, III, Commonwealth's Attorney
l'" "'
County of Albemarle
Office of Board of County Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesvil1e~ V A 22902-4596
(804) L96-5843
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE
(please type orlJrint)
ission / Committee THOMAS JEFFERSON HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS CORPORATION
Applicant's
Home Addre
Bruce Whitmore Kirtley
Home Phone
(804 823-5254
Route l, Box 405
Crozet, VA 22932
Magisterial 0' strict in which your home residence is located
The Robins Cellars
White Hall
Business Add ess
Route 19, Box 42
Charlottesville, VA
Phone
22902
(804) 296-0029
Employer
l2-l5-9l
Wine Wholesaler/General Manager
t in Albemarle County
Bonnie Marie Kirtley
Previous Residence
Number of Children
one
Education (0 grees and Graduation Dates) Bachelor of Arts, Uni versi ty of Richmond, 1975
Master of Arts, University of Richmond, 1977
executive committee),
at school functions when requested.
We are also annual contributors to various local charities, including Western Albemarle
Rescua Squad, Fire Department, as well as other selected charities.
The informat on provided on this application will be released to the public upon request.
0-- vJ ~LK
....
\2..-2Z-'1~
Signature
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Date
'. .1'
December 21, 1992
To Whom It May Concern:
After 38 years of being a full-time resident of Albemarle
County, I believe it is time to begin giving back some of the good
things I have received from this area. I principally want to be a
par~ of this endeavor so that my son, Whit, who is 7 years old, can
have access to our beautiful surroundings which are made all the
more beautiful by the unique variety of people who inhabit
Alb~marle County; from the well-to-do to the less prosperous, from
the new residents moving in to those families who have resided here
for generations.
I feel I am uniquely qualified for any positions available (or
a number of reasons. First, I have mentioned my perspective of
beihg a 38 year native of Albemarle. Secondly, having grown up
wit~ and worked in my parents' family businesses (Kirtley
Dis~ributing Co., of which I am currently a Vice President, and
Kir ley Realty (now Kirtley-Watterson), with which I am an
asspciate), I have travelled the county and gotten to know a lot
of its citizens. I have seen it grow and grapple with those
pro blems related to growth. Thirdly, I was blessed with an
ext I-emely rewarding educational experience of the University of
Ric1mond, from which I hold a B.A. in English and Religion, as well
as !:in M.A. in English. I also attended graduate school at the
Uni, ersity of Virginia in the Religious Studies department.
~ '. '..,
Fi]~ally, having run several wholesale operations since 1977, I am
fa ~iliar with all of the demands and problems associated with
rUIning a company of 40+ employees. I know the personal side as
we 1 as the dollars and cents aspects of business. Both will prove
to be invaluable in making good, sound business decisions for the
COlnty of Albemarle...decisions grounded in the ultimate need to
selve the people of Albemarle.
Over the past 7 years, my wife and I have restored an old farm
ho\se. During this restoration, we were able to help restore a
liitle bit of Albemarle to some of its past grandeur. I hope in
rec eiving an appointment to this commission, I can continue to give
a ittle more back to Albemarle and keep it the some wonderful
cOD~unity I have come to love for 38 years.
\.
Edward H. Bin, Jr
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvi e
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
January 19, 1993
. Bruce Kirtley
ute 1, Box 405
ozet, VA 22932
Mr. Kirtley:
This letter is to confirm that you have an interview with
t e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, February
3, 1993, at 12:30 p.m., for the Joint Airport Commission, Commu-
nity Services Board (Region Ten), Thomas Jefferson Housing
I rovements Corporation, Jordan Development Corporation, Public
Re reational Facilities Authority and Board of Social Services.
Th interview will be held on the fourth floor of the County
Office Building.
If you have any questions, please contact our office at
-5843.
Sincerely,
~w (!~. .
Ella W. Carey
Clerk, CMC
EW /jnh
*
Printed on recycled paper
f '..
Edward H Ba n. Jr
Samuei Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 A596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972A060
February 8, 1993
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S Martin
Rl\ianna
Charlotte Y umphns
Jack Jouell
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
. Thomas F. Stephens
ute 4, Box 234A
arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. stephens:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February 3,
1993, you were reappointed to the Jordan Development Corporation
ard with a term to expire on August 13, 1993.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
(~/5~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
Forrest Kerns, Director
James L. Camblos, III, Commonweal~h's Attorney
j "'.
Edward H. Bai , Jr.
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvill
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
January 19, 1993
. Thomas F. Stephens
ute 4, Box 234A
arlottesville, VA 22901
ar Mr. Stephens:
This letter is to confirm that you have an interview with
e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, February
1993, at 12:50 p.m., for the Jordan Development Corporation.
e interview will be held on the fourth floor of the County
fice Building.
If you have any questions, please contact our office at
6-5843.
Sincerely,
r /: {; .r.
t,ljt>( L0 /,;
Ella W. Carey
Clerk, CMC
.
(., .. 1 J /\
-LCtv\ ..
1/
/1
U
E C/jnh
*
Printed on recycled paper
....
..
Edward H. Bai Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
~orrest R Marshall. Jr
Scoftsville
David P. Bowe man
CharJottesvil1
Charles S Martin
Rlvanni"J
Charlotte Y H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F PerkinS
White Hall
October 5, 1992
Mr. Thomas F. Stephens
Jo dan Development Corporation Board
Ro e 4, Box 234A
Ch rlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Stephens:
Your term on the Jordan Development Corporation Board
ired on August 13, 1992.
At your earliest convenience, please let this office know
ther reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
be prepared if necessary.
.-;f'/dL
ettie E. Nehe~~~c
Board of County Supervisors
LE /jnh
"
l
,
,
i
I
I
i
Edward H Bal~. Jr
S,llTlUfOi Mdlt'1
David P Bowe~man
Charlolte5\.'illll
Charlotte Y HtmphflS
Jack Jouett
i
I
I
i
I
i
i
M~. C. Timothy Lindstrom
H R 1, Box 20
C arlottesville, Va 2290l
I .,..--;....__ .
D~ar ..Mr. Lindstrom: 7.A/'VY7.
i
I
: At the Board of Supervisors meeting
1993, you were reappointed to the Public
A~thority Board with a term to expire on
I
I On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
o~portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
w~llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Forrest R Marshall ,Jr
'")1"()!ts\."III",
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Chdrles S Martm
Hi\},'lnn,l
\^,ialler F PerkinS
Whil!;' Hall
February 8, 1993
held on February 3,
Recreational Facilities
December 13, 1995.
Sincerely,
'7J~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D~B/jnh
i
i
c~: James L. Camblos, III, Commonwealth's Attorney
l
Route 7, Box 228
Charlottesville, VA 22901
November 19, 1992
I
i
I
I
Lfttie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
Bbard of County Supervisors
4~1 McIntire Road
qharlottesville, VA 22901-4596
I
I
Qear Ms. Neher:
I
I
:}ank you for your letter of October 5,1992 stating that my term on the Public
icreational Facilities Authority Board will expire on December 13, 1992,
I lam willing to serve on this Board again if the Board of Supervisors is willing to
hrve me do so.
I
I
Stncerely,
I
I~~~
I
I
q 'TImothy Lindstrom
/.... L. I
I
I
I
I
Edward H Bal~. Jr
Samuel Mille~
David P. Bowelman
Charlottes viII
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
October 5, 1992
C. Timothy Lindstrom
lic Recreational Facilities
Authority Board
1, Box 20
rlottesville, VA 22901
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
S(:oltsville
Charles 5 Martin
Rivanna
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
I
I
Detr Mr. Lindstrom:
I
i Your term on the Public Recreational Facilities Authority
Board will expire on December 13, 1992.
I
I
tAt your earliest convenience, please let this office know
wh ther reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
ma be prepared if necessary.
~.
Lettie E. Neher, Cler , CMC
Board of County Supervisors
LEf/jnh
.~ -
David P Bow rman
Charloltesvdl
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. ,Ir
Scotts\.'ilie
Edward H Bain. Jr
Samuel Mille
Charles S _ Martin
Ri\/21llfli'l.
Charlotte Y Humphns
Jack Jouett
Walter F _ Perkins
White Hall
February 8, 1993
. Scott B. Peyton
ven Oaks Farm
eenwood, VA 22943
Mr. Peyton:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February 3,
93, you were reappointed to the Public Recreational Facilities
thority with a term to expire on December 13, 1995.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
llingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
~
/ )
{bHt$~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D Bjjnh
c C. Timothy Lindstrom, Chairman
James L. Camblos, III, Commonwealth's Attorney
.'-
Edward H. Ba n, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvil\
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
. Scott Peyton
ven Oaks Farm
eenwood, VA 22943
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
ar Mr. Peyton:
January 19, 1993
Your term on the Public Recreational Facilities Authority
ard expired on December 13, 1992.
Please contact this office at 296-5843, by January 27, 1993,
i you wish to be reappointed to this Board.
E C/jnh
Sincerely,
Lf.'
/':'U?l tiu
la W. Carey
Clerk, CMC
*
Printed on recycled paper
Edward H. Bai . Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scotl5ville
David P Bowe man
Charlottesvjll
Charles S Martin
Riv(lnna
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
October 5, 1992
Mr. Scott B. Peyton
Public Recreational Facilities
A thority Board
Seve Oaks Farm
Gree ood, VA 22943
Dear r. Peyton:
our term on the Public Recreational Facilities Authority
will expire on December 13, 1992.
t your earliest convenience, please let this office know
r reappointment is desired so that a public advertisement
prepared if necessary.
Sincerely,
~- ~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
LEN / j h
. ,
~~ ....
Edward H Bai . Jr
Samuei Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 A596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
S(otl5\'t1ie
David P _ Bow fman
Charlollesvill
Charles S, Martm
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouetl
Walter F _ Perkms
White Hall
February 8, 1993
. Tim Michel
R 1, Box 21
arlottesville, Virginia 22901
D
-
Mr. niGlH:~l': / ~ :
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February 3,
93, you were appointed to the Public Recreational Facilities
thority with a term to expire on December 13, 1995.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
portunity to express the Board's appreciation for your
llingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
~-~
( ...i ~
I / ..
.J// '
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D B/jnh
C C. Timothy Lindstrom, Chairman
James L. Camblos, III, Commonwealth's Attorney
~ ~
"
County of Albemarle
Office of Board of County Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville~ VA 22902-4596
(804) L96-5843
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE
(please type oI'llrint)
mission / Committee Public Recreational Facilities Authority
Applicant's
Tim Michel
Home Phone 973-2187
HCR 1, Box 21 Charlottesville. Virginia 22901
istrict in which your home residence is located Jack J oue t t
Employer
Phone 295-1131
503 Faulconer Drive, Suite 5 Charlottesville. Virginia 22903
N/A
Occupation/Title Real Estate/Associate Broker
18 years
Previous Residence Philadelphia . Pennsylvania
Virginia P. Michel
Number of Children
2
egrees and Graduation Dates) BA - Lafayette. 1970. Master Landscape Architech. University
1976
C.A.A.R. - Charlottesville
Inc.
Board
A
interest in land
and a belief in ublic servic
reasons
osition.
The inform ion provided on this application will be released to the public upon request.
Signature
Return to : Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Date
""
'.
Edward H Bai , Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
December 28, 1992
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
SCQtl5ville
David P Bowe man
Charloltesvill
Charles S. Martin
Rlvanna
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
Tim Michel
1, Box 21
rlottesville, VA 22901
r Applicant:
r completed application form has been received and attached is
lo~-chart outlining the appointment process for all Boards and
issions and a fact sheet on the Board or Commission for which
are applying. We appreciate your willingness to serve on the
lic Recreational Facilities Authorit .
r application will be distributed to the Board members for
ir review; for a magisterial district appointment your
lication will be forwarded only to the supervisor of your
trict. Depending on the position and the number of
licants, the Board will decide whether to interview qualified
didates. If you are selected for an interview, you will be
ified approximately two to three weeks after the application
sing date. You will also be notified at approximately the
e time if you are not selected for an interview.
it is not always possible, due to the Board's meeting
sc_edules, or the schedule of individual members, the Board
attempts to schedule interviews within 45 days and to make the
actual appointment within 60 days of the application deadline.
If you have any questions on the status of your application
d'ring that time period, please do not hesitate to call this
office.
-i
;?;2~~~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervisors
A tadunents
*
Printed on recycled paper
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scotlsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
January 19, 1993
M . Tim Michel
H R 1, Box 21
C arlottesville, VA 22901
D ar Mr. Michel:
This letter is to confirm that you have an interview with
t e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, February
3, 1993, at 12:45 p.m., for the Public Recreational Facilities
A thority. The interview will be held on the fourth floor of the
C unty Office Building.
If you have any questions, please contact our office at
2 6-5843.
Sincerely,
L
~l0C~
Ella W. Carey
Clerk, CMC
E C/jnh
(1)
Printed on recycled paper
.
.
.
Time of Interview
12:30 p.m.
12:40 p.m.
12:45 p.m.
12:50 p.m.
1:00 p.m.
1:10 p.m.
1:20 p.m.
font acted by letter
ontacted by letter
INTERVIEWS
Name of Applicant
Bruce Kirtley
Pat Coopersmith
Tim Michel
Tom Stevens (currently
on Jordan Development
Corporation, would
like to be
reappointed)
Burdette (Lou) Ives
Charles Smith
Arthur B. Brown
Scott Peyton
(currently serving on
Public Recreational
Facities Authority,
would like to be
reappointed)
D. James Firster
(received no response
- copy of letter
attached)
Position
Joint Airport
Commission
Community Services
Board (Region Ten)
Thomas Jefferson
Housing Imprvements
Corporation
Jordan Development
Corporation
Public Recreational
Facilities Authority
Community Services
Board (Region Ten)
Public Recreational
Facilities Authority
Jordan Development
Corporation
Joint Airport
Commission
Joint Airport
Commission
Joint Airport
Commission
Public Recreational
Facilities Authority
Jordan Development
Corporation
.
.
.
.
Echl.'Md r i
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
S,ottS\/ll1e
David P 80 erman
Charles S _ Martin
Riv('Jnna.
Charlotte Y umphns
Jack Jouet
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
January 19, 1993
M . D. James Firster
1 60 Auburn Drive
C arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Firster:
Your term on the Jordan Development Corporation expired on
gust 13, 1992.
Please contact this office at 296-5843, by January 27, 1993,
you wish to be reappointed to this Board.
Sincerely,
1tL~ (J C 0Au
Ella w. Carey "'y
Clerk, CMC LI
E C/jnh
*
Printed on recycled paper
/.-
Edward H B 111. Jr
Samuel M11I_r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
~Qrr\!s' R Marstldll Jr
')U)ll",...:lIe
David P Bow..>rman
Charlotte<;vi Ie
Charles S Mnrll!l
Rlvanna.
Charlotte Y _ umphris
Jack Jou('t!
Walter F Perkms
Whltl' Hall
February 8, 1993
. Edward H. Deets, jr.
06 Bennington Road
arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Deets:
This letter is written in appreciation of your service
ring 1991 and 1992 on the Equalization Board.
The Board of Supervisors has asked me to express its thanks
you for the many hours which you spent as a member of Equal-
ation Board. Please be assured that your efforts have been
ted and the Board thanks you for your service.
Sincerely,
(,~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
D Bjjnh
J -/nrL~A-.~
-cA-t- ~ J ~ J o-v-d;/- ~
.AUtk- ~ dee(? <77 7t.. If? o-a.:JJ r If' f 5. ~
.k- ~. ~ ~ ~ /./1KYl ~ ("'d<...
/I#~. (/)~~
*
Printed on recycled paper
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
o F
INTENT
BE IT RESOLVED that the 'Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Cpunty, Virginia, does hereby state its intent to rezone Tax Map
3~C, Section 3, Parcel 2, for Robert o. and Victoria H. Burton,
tp R-4, Residential, from RA, Rural Areas; and
FURTHER requests the Albemarle County Planning Commission to
hpld a public hearing on said intent to rezone this property, and
dpes request that the Planning Commission send its recommendation
tp this Board at the earliest possible date.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
wr~ting, is a true, correct copy of a policy resolution unanimously
adppted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
at a regular meeting held on February 3, 1993.
/~l
~~~,C~~a~~f j~:::1 Supervisors