HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-03-03
FIN A L
March 3" 1993
9:00 A.M.
R~ #7" County Off ice Building
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5 ) Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) Approval of Minutes: March 11 (N), 1992 and January 13, 1993.
7) Highway Matters:
a) Discussion: Revised 1992-98 Six Year Secondary Road Construction Program.
b) Discussion: Langford Farms Subdivision.
c) Other Highway Matters.
8) Public Bearing on a request to include property of David Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum
(Goco, Inc.) in the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority; water
service only to TM79,P19, zoned C-1; water service only to existing structures to TM79,P18,
zoned RA (deferred from February 3, 1993).
9) Status Report on Crozet Crossing Project.
10 10:00 A.M. - Public Bearing to solicit conunents on a Conununity Development Block Grant (CDBG)
application to be submitted to the Virginia Department of Housing and Conununity Development for
a county housing rehabilitation project which may include the Esmont, North Garden, Covesville,
Batesville, Crozet, Midway, Afton, Schuyler and Keswick areas.
11 Update on review of Comprehensive Plan.
12 Proposal to establish Section 8 Housing Advisory Conunittee.
13 Discussion: Options to regulate towers in the rural areas.
14 Darden Towe Memorial, Discussion of Conunittee Report.
15 Discussion: Grass/Weed Cutting Ordinance.
16 Fiscal & Management Options, Discussion.
17 Presentation of 1991-92 Audit.
18 Discussion: Tax Relief for the Elderly and Totally and Permanelltly Disabled.
19 Appropriations:
a. Conununity Attention.
b. FY 1991-92 Year-End Adjustments.
c. ABIP.
d. Keene Landfill Monitoring.
e. Elis Ollson Memorial Foundation Grant.
f. Family Literacy Grant.
g. Teacher Incentive Grants from the Virginia Conunission for the Arts for Stony Point Elementary
School.
h. Albemarle High School Food Service.
i. ADA Compliance - Parks and Recreation.
j. Sheriff's Bailiff.
20 *Executive Session: Personnel & Legal Matters.
21 Certify Executive Session.
22 1:30 P.M.. Meeting Room 5/6 - Joint Meeting with School Board.
a. Discussion: FY 1993-94 School Budget.
b. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda.
23 Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
24 Adjourn.
*It is expected that the Board will entertain a motion to enter into executive session, as permitted
by Section 2.1-344 of the Code of Virginia, under Section 2.l-344.A.1 for the purpose of discussing
personnel matters and under Section 2.l-344.A.7 for the purpose of discussing legal matters.
CONSENT AGENDA
JIl R APPROVAL:
5 1 Appolllbnent of Joseph Henley, III, to replace Rutil Chiles, on the Agricultural and Forestal Indus-
tries Support Conunittee.
5.2 Memorandum dated February 25, 1993, from V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Plalming & ConlDlUIlity
Development, re: upsizing of the water line to Stone Robinson.
5.3 Authorize Chairman to execute deed conveying underground electric power easement to Appalachian
Power Company.
Fe R INFORMATION:
5.14 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) Report.
5.5 Letter dated February 19, 1993, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, Department of TrallSporta-
tion, re: intersection of Greenbrier Drive and Conunonwealth Drive.
5.~ Letter dated February 16, 1993, from The Honorable L. F. Payne, House of Representatives, re:
resolution adopted by Board of Superv1sors concerning proposed EPA regulations on financial assur-
ance requirements as tiley affect local governments.
5.b Letter dated February 17, 1993, from Amelia G. McCulley, Zoning Administrator, addressed to Roger W.
Ray, entitled: Official Deteraination of "'-her of Parcels - Section 10.3.1 (Tax Map 14, Parcel 42
- Garrison Estate).
5.6 Letter dated February 12, 1993, from Amelia G. McCulley, Zoning Administrator, addressed to Roger W.
Ray, entitled: Official Deteraination of "'-her of Parcels - Section 10.3.1 (Tax Map 39, Parcel 29
- David F. Wayland, Etal., owners).
5.1l Letter dated February 22, 1993, from Amelia G. McCulley, Zoning Administrator, addressed to Charles
Frallkfurt, entitled: Official Detendnation of Ntaber of Parcels - Section 10.3.1 (Tax Map 82,
Parcel 3 (known in part as Stanford Ball).
5. 0 Copy of Final Environmental Impact Statement for U.S. Route 29 Corridor Study (State Project:
6029-002-122,PE100) Albemarle County and City of Charlottesville (on file in Clerk's office).
5. 1 Copy of notice to tile public of an application filed Witil the State Corporation COlmnission for all
expedited increase in rates by C~ltral Virginia Electric Cooperative.
5. 2 Copy of PlaIming Conunission minutes for February 2, 1993.
5. 3 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority for January 21,
1993.
5. 4 Memorandum dated February 25, 1993, from Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive, addressed to
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., Cowlty Executive, re: hunting regulations.
5. 5 Memorandum dated February 25, 1993, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., COWlty Executive, re: House Bill
1205 - Landfill issue.
5 .l~ Financial Management Report for Jalluary, 1993.
5.1b Executive Summary received February 26, 1993, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, re:
Route 29 Bypass and proposed subdivisions, in response to letter dated February 16, 1993, received
from J. S. Hodge, Chief Engineer, Department of Transportation.
5.1a Letter dat.ed February 11, 1993, from The Honorable Omrles S. Robb, Senate, re: resolution adopted
by the Board of Supervisors concerning proposed EPA regulations and financial assurance requirements
as they affect local govern.ents.
5.19 Me8orancIt.. dated February 26, 1993, fn:a Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering, addressed to Robert W.
Tucker, Jr., County Executive, re: Waynesboro solid waste bailing operation.
.' f 1
Edward H. Bin, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
40l Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvil e
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning & Community
Development
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC [l0 ~
March 4, 1993
Board Actions of March 3, 1993
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on March 3, 1993, the following
ac ions were taken:
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
LIe. There were none.
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Appointment of Joseph Henley, III, to replace Ruth
Ch les, on the Agricultural and Forestal Industries Support Committee.
AP ROVED.
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Memorandum dated February 25, 1993, from V. Wayne
Ci imberg, Director of Planning & Community Development, re: upsizing of the
wa er line to Stone Robinson. CONCURRED with staff that the upsizing of the
er line to Stone Robinson is consistent with past practice and practical long
ge planning; and that the wording regarding the sizing of utility lines for
Stone Robinson School be deleted during the upcoming review of the Compre-
sive Plan.
Agenda Item No. 5.3. Authorize Chairman to execute deed conveying under-
und electric power easement to Appalachian Power Company. AUTHORIZED the
irman to sign the attached deed. Original agreement forwarded to
ineering.
*
Printed on recycled paper
.
M~mo To:
D lite:
P~ge 2
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
March 4, 1993
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matter: Discussion: Revised 1992-98 Six Year
S~condary Road Construction Program. ACCEPTED the attached 1992-98 Six Year
S condary Road Construction Program, as revised 10-92.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Discussion: Langford Farms Subdivision. APPROPRIATED
$ 2,000 to bring Montgomery Lane and Pippin Lane in Langford Farms Subdivision
i to the State Secondary System. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
The Board asked staff to see if there is any flexibility in VDoT's policy
t at requires occupancy of three houses before a road can be taken into the
SI condary System, as the policy relates to residential development and holding
binds.
The Board also asked the County Attorney to look into the legalities and
irplications of requiring the major stockholder of a corporation to provide his
p~rsonal endorsement on a bond.
Agenda Item No. 7c. Other Highway Matters.
Mr. Roosevelt announced that the public hearing on the improvements to
H'draulic Road will be held on March 11, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at Jack Jouett
M"ddle School.
Mrs. Humphris announced that there will be a meeting of the Southern Char-
lcttesville Transportation Study and Entrance Corridor Plan on March 11, 1993,
at 7:30 p.m., at Jackson Via Elementary School.
Agenda Item No.8. Public Hearing on a request to include property of
Dc~id Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum (Goco, Inc.) in the service area
bo~ndaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority; water service only to
TM79,P19, zoned C-1; water service only to existing structures to TM79,P18,
zaJned RA.
DENIED both requests.
Agenda Item No.9. Status Report on Crozet Crossing Project.
APPROVED the Charlottesville Housing Foundation's request to proceed with
holne sales.
APPROVED an amendment to the Recapture Plan to reflect a minimum recapture
of $300,000.
The Board requested that more frequent status reports and a copy of the
au~it be provided on the project.
.'
MEmo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
March 4, 1993
D te:
Pc ge 3
Agenda Item No. 10. Public Hearing to solicit comments on a Community
DEvelopment Block Grant (CDBG) application to be submitted to the Virginia
DEpartment of Housing and Community Development for a county housing rehabili-
tc tion project which may include the Esmont, North Garden, Covesville, Bates-
v lIe, Crozet, Midway, Afton, Schuyler and Keswick areas.
ADOPTED the attached resolution endorsing the proposed project and autho-
r.zed the County Executive to submit the appropriate documents for the CDBG
aI plication.
Agenda Item No. 11. Update on review of Comprehensive Plan. Staff to
dEvelop a schedule on when the review of the Plan will start and what would be
d"scussed at a joint meeting with the Planning Commission.
Agenda Item No. 12. Proposal to establish Section 8 Housing Advisory
Ccmmittee. APPROVED the establishment of a Section 8 Housing Advisory Committee
a5 outlined on the attached.
Agenda Item No. 13. Discussion: Options to regulate towers in the rural
aleas. ADOPTED the attached Resolution of Intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance.
Tle Board requested staff to encourage applicants to clearly articulate loca-
t.onal criteria and optimum standards they use, and the trade-offs for siting
U e towers.
Agenda Item No. 14. Darden Towe Memorial, Discussion of Committee Report.
ENDORSED a request to rename the Rivanna Park the "Darden Towe Memorial
Perk" and GRANTED permission for private funds to be raised by the Memorial
Cc~ittee for the purpose of financing a bust of Darden to be placed in the
Park. The Board also ENDORSED the naming of the future Greenbelt Park the
"Rivanna Greenbelt Park".
Agenda Item No. 15. Discussion: Grass/Weed Cutting Ordinance. No action.
Agenda Item No. 16. Fiscal & Management Options, Discussion. Staff to
pr~pare a report on the possibility of adding a referendum on the November
ballot that would allow transportation districts.
Agenda Item No. 17. Presentation of 1991-92 Audit.
Mr. Bain asked what would be the cost to develop a fixed asset inventory
th~t would eliminate the qualifying statement in the County's audit. He also
re~uested a meeting of the Audit Committee, Auditors and Mr. Breeden to look at
th~ best alternative available for eliminating that statement.
D,te:
P,ge 4
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
March 4, 1993
MEmo To:
Agenda Item No. 18. Discussion: Tax Relief for the Elderly and Totally
al d Permanently Disabled.
SET a public hearing for April 7, 1993, at 10:15 a.m., to amend Sections
8 26 and 8-27 of the County Code, to raise the income and asset levels on tax
rElief for the elderly and permanently and totally disabled based on Option 2
SEt out in the staff report.
Staff to consider legislation that would provide graduated deferment based
01 income for all citizens.
Staff to give a list of options for possible tax relief that could be
d.scussed with the State legislators.
Agenda Item No. 19a. Appropriation: Community Attention. APPROVED.
Alpropriation form requested from Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 19b. Appropriation: FY 1991-92 Year-End Adjustments.
AI PROVED. Appropriation forms forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 19c. Appropriation: AHIP. APPROVED. Appropriation form
fcrwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 19d. Appropriation: Keene Landfill Monitoring. APPROVED.
Alpropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Board members requested information on what is included in the testing and
mcnitoring costs and whether the project was bid.
Agenda Item No. 1ge. Appropriation: Elis Ollson Memorial Foundation
GIant. APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 19f. Appropriation: Family Literacy Grant. APPROVED.
Afpropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 199. Appropriation: Teacher Incentive Grants from the
Vi~ginia Commission for the Arts for Stony Point Elementary School. APPROVED.
Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 19h. Appropriation: Albemarle High School Food Service.
ApPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Mjm10 To:
D te:
P ge 5
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
March 4, 1993
Agenda Item No. 19i. Appropriation: ADA Compliance - Parks and Recrea-
ton. APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 19j. Appropriation: Sheriff's Bailiff. APPROVED.
A propriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 22a. Discussion: FY 1993-94 School Budget. No Action.
Agenda Item No. 22b. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda. There were
nIne.
Agenda Item No. 23. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
Mr. Bain requested an update on a previous inquiry to categorize smokers
ard nonsmokers in the County's health insurance program.
Mr. Bain suggested a committee of two Board members meet with Congressional
r€presentatives in Washington. to discuss the issue of Route 29 North, particu-
lcrly Meadow Creek Parkway and the overpasses. This meeting would be an attempt
tc facilitate a better understanding of everybody's position on this project and
tc see of there are any additional funds available. The staff is to begin
ccordinating such a meeting after the budget process is complete.
Agenda Item No. 24. Adjourn. Adjourned at 3:35 p.m.
Ev C:mms
Attachments
cc: Robert B. Brandenburger
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Jo Higgins
Amelia McCulley
George R. St. John
File
THIS AGREEMENT, made this
Eas No.
W.O. No.
Line
R/W Map No. 3879-743
756-0011 Job No. 93- Prop No.
,]pffrpy All pn HClnpy
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
day of
, 1993
and between
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Vi rQi ni a
, herein called "Grantor", and APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, a
irginia corporation, herein called "Appalachian",
That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00). cash in hand paid to Grantor by
ppalachian, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, conveys, and warrants
t Appalachian, its successors, assigns, lessees and tenants, a right of way and easement for an electric
p wer line or lines, and communication lines, in, on, along, through, across or under the following
d scribed lands of the Grantor situated in Scottsvi 11 e
istrict, County of A 1 bema r 1 e (Tax Map 121 , State of
Parcel 82A2)
S. E. Mawyer
Jeffrey Allen Haney
Douglas C. Wain. Jr.
Secondary Highway Number 715
southeasterl V direction from
po 1 e numbered 743-26
n the North by the lands of
n the East by the lands of
n the South by the lands of
n the West by mt:K~~
Virginia, and bounded:
XW<
a ~xA<<~~~~~xyyyyxyyy'YYxyyxyyyyyyxxyyyyyXYYxx~oooo~~xooixxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All as shown on Appalachian's Drawing No. A-4567 dated May 30, 1991, attached
reto and made a part hereof. This is a 10 foot wide easement.
TOGETHER with the right, privilege and authority to Appalachian, its successors, assigns, lessees and
t nants to construct, erect, install, place, operate, maintain, inspect, repair, renew, remove, add to the
umber of, and relocate at will underground conduits, ducts, vaults, cables, wires, transformers, pedestals,
isers, pads, fixtures, and appurtenances (hereinafter called "Appalachian's Facilities") in, on, along,
t rough, across and under the above referred to premises; the right to disturb the surface of said premises
nd to excavate thereon, and to cut down, trim, clear, and/or otherwise control, and at Appalachian's option,
r move from said premises, brush, undergrowth, trees, tree roots, shrubs, buildings or other obstructions
hich may endanger the safety of, or interfere with the use of, Appalachian's Facilities; and the right of
i gress and egress to and over said above referred to premises, and any of the adjoining lands
f the Grantors at any and all times, for the purpose of exercising and enjoying the rights herein granted,
and doing anything necessary or useful or convenient in connection therewith.
It is understood and agreed between the parties hereto, that the Grantor reserves the right to use said
I nds in any way not inconsistent with the rights herein granted.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto Appalachian Power Company, its successors, assigns, lessees
a d tenants.
It is agreed that the foregoing is the entire contract between the parties hereto, and that this written
a reement is complete in all its terms and provisions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereto affixed the day
a d year first above written.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .,...--e;ournv OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
. i _ ./,/ ' /"..---r7
Ry - '4L-/."Y--::;~Z~/?-~~4?;7-r
~. .v p
~X~ Chairman
/llt C ~
ATTEST:
S ATE OF \J ~\ C~\;~""\ ~ C\
COUNTY OF ~ \ \\)lJ.;\nc\:\ ~\
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
To-wit:
.L\~
day of
1993 ,by
Chairman
. of BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - COUNTY
, a Vi rq i n i a
,q
COI poratioFl, on bohalf of the COfJ36ffit+on.
'\)"","', \ \}. 1'\\, S ,"'I; \)~ \5:t!
Notary Public/Commission r
(For W. Va. Only)
DECLARATION OF CONSIDERATION OF VALUE
U der the penalties of fine and imprisonment as
p ovided by law the undersigned (grantee) hereby
d clares the total consideration for the property trans-
fe red by this document is ($ ).
G ven under my hand this day of
.19_.
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
(For W, Va. Only)
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED
By
B
G W 256-UNDGRD-AP (Page 2)
EXISTING
ELECTRIC
..
co
..
.
..
..
~
rn
\!!
...
I ~
III
~
~
0-
..
~
~
a
(,iT-,:"" .
,-
S. E. MAWYER
IRON
STONE
PILE
IRON
JEFFREY ALLEN
HANEY
IRON
DOUGLAS C, WAIN, JR.
" ""
1-29-93
DATE
CHANGED ROUTE OF FACILITIES
REVISION
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
MAP SHOWING PROPOSED
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC .
FACILITIES TO BE INSTALLED ON
THE PROPERTY OF THE COUNTY
OF ALBEMARLE NEAR KEENE, VA.
FACILITIES TO SERVE NEW "
ES DENCE OF JEFFREY ALLEN
!J"AWN.V T.A.M./M.C.A DATIl: 5-30-91
A~~..V G. WINGFIELD ec.AU I- _ 200'
eHllllT
0..
eHllne
DRAWING No. A-4567
~;. , -
~:;r\,~ft5::~~,
,:~ (!li-~I,," ~r
.11 II'~. .~\. "'..'
~' 'I~I,~\ .~.
l~ \1 r-r ~
c. "-"......~L~....,~. ~)
~"") "",,>,1'..,,
."0, . ,." ~tJZ 1'ti'
~~"n. T'f1-~~~?
";;~,;;,;:':&
RECEIVED
FEB 'I U b~3
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA P!ann}ng Dept
RAY D. PE HTEL
COMMISSIO ER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902
February 9, 1993
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director
ning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Ch rlottesville, VA 22901
De
Cilimberg:
Due to changes in the scope of the proposed improvements to Route 682
oject: 0682-002-P33,C501), the advertisement dates for other gravel road
jects have been affected. The Route 682 project was originally scheduled as a
plan project to be built utilizing donated right of way. Since donated right
way was not available, a decision was made to develop plans and purchase right
way. The cost for developing plans and purchasing right of way is
siderably higher than the original no-plan concept. With the limited
ocation of gravel road funds, this is delaying financing on other gravel road
jects in the current Six-Year Plan. Some advertisement dates will be delayed
much as two years and one project will be deleted from the Six-Year Plan due
lack of available funds.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
th's office.
Sincerely,
~Lctvv
A. G. Tucker
Asst. Resident Engineer
GG /yrm
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
..
~~~\'~~{j~ ~ ',:}~
("'I!i . -: '''k.
'-' '.' ~..:..., ~~l\
~!: (,'~J.;' ,~~
.' ! I',~ \, ',:J
, ' ~,t,' ~ii ,r-7J:.f
.' '{I~~l~,j":" :$'
,\, J#~h" -rct...I~j1Jl
t-'-~~1.....~i
ic"'ii
r,.,,~
11 J..
{~;:~.:.~ V
J'\\j 2 () '1I(J
\ ~. . . U I J .'.J
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIAF'/ann!np DGt.}'
RAY D. PET TEL
COMMISSIO ER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 2013
CHARLOITESVILLE. 22902
January 21, 1993
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg
Dir ctor of Planning & Community Development
Alb marle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Cha lottesville, VA 22901
Re: Secondary Six Year Plan 92-98
Albemarle County
Dea Mr. Cilimberg:
Please find attached an updated copy of the 1992-98 Secondary Six Year
Con truction Program for Albemarle County. The revisions highlighted in yellow
hav occurred because of changes in advertisement dates for both the Meadowcreek
Par way and Route 682 projects.
We are requesting a meeting to review the impact of these changes on the
overall plan. Please contact us at your convenience with a suitable time and
dat for this discussion.
Yours truly,
~1/U!JlL/}/
A. G. TUCKer
Asst. Resident Engineer
AGT yrm
a tt chmen t
cc: Ms. G. D. Lipscomb
Mr. J. A. DePasquale
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
. ..
PR ORITY
( 0 )
( 1
( 2 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
(4 )
( 5 )
( 6 )
( 6 )
( 7 )
( 8 )
( 9 )
( 1 0 )
( 11 )
( 1 2 )
( 13)
( 14)
( 15)
( 1 6 )
( 1 7 )
( 1 8 )
( 1 9 )
(20)
(21 )
(22)
(23~
(24)
( 2511
(26~
(27
T
ROUTE
631
625
664
684
692
729
738
788
800
810
708
654
631
631
671
631
678
743
631
691
866
631
656
601
649
691
651
627
682
610
712
711
760
637
759
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SIX YEAR PLAN
REVISED 10-92
PROJECT
0631-002-128,C503
CO. WIDE BUDGET ITEM
HATTON FERRY
0664-002 PLANT MIX
0684-002 PLANT MIX
0692-002 PLANT MIX
0729-002 PLANT MIX
0738-002 PLANT MIX
0788-002 PLANT MIX
0800-002 PLANT MIX
0810-002 PLANT MIX
CO. WIDE PLANT MIX
0708-002-241,C501
0654-002-242,C501
0631-002-128,C502 '
0631-002-128,B612
0671-002-191,B646
0631-002-224,C502
0678-002-223,C501
0743-002-153,C502
0631-002-185,C501
0691-002-234,C501
0866-002-236,C501
0631-002- ,c
0656-002- ,C
0601-002-237,C501
0649-002-158,C501
0691-002- ,c
0651-002- ,B
0627-002- ,c
0682-002-P33,N501
0610-002-P ,N
0712-002-P ,N
0711-002-p ,N
0760-002-P,N _______
0637-002-p ,N
0759-002-p ,N
o INOfC/7TE5 C/I/JJ1IGCj) /l/.J//. .t//1TE5
PREVo
AD DATE
REV .
AD DATE
(DEFICIT)
7-92
7-92
7-92
7-93
7-93
7-92
7-93
7-93
7-92
7-92
7-94
1-94
6-92
1-99
1-99
11-92
7-92
2-94
6-94
7-95
2-94
7-96
1-2010
10-97
10-97
7-99
7-2000
7-2000
10-93
7-92
7-94
1-96
7-96
7-96
7-97
7-97
.1-97
1-97
7-94
7-96
7-97
7-99
10-99
7-2001
1-95
7-96
7-96
7-97
7-97
7-99
----- DELETED
,
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, that pursuant to public hearings, the County of
bemarle wishes to apply $500,000 of Virginia Community Developm-
t Block Grant funds for a housing rehabilitation project to
dress thirty-two (32) dwelling units; and
WHEREAS, $201,000 from Albemarle County and $460,000 will be
cured in the form of low interest loans on behalf of the client
ilies from the Charlottesville Housing Foundation loan fund, the
rginia Housing Partnership loan fund and Farmers Home Administra-
on; it is projected that eighty (80) persons will benefit from
e implementation of this project; all of which are low-and-
derate income persons;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Robert W. Tucker,
ecutive, is hereby authorized to sign and submit the
cuments for submittal of this Virginia Community
ock Grant application.
Jr., County
appropriate
Development
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
w iting, is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously
a opted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
at a regular meeting held on March 3, 1993.
~~~+
Clerk, Board of c~nty Supervisors
.,
ATTACHMENT C
SECTION 8 ADVISORY COMMITTEE OUTLINE
ose of the Committee: To provide specific recommendations for
ctions to improve the utilization of the Section 8 program,
articularly to make the Section 8 Certificate program more
ttractive to area landlords.
ommittee Product: A brief report would be written outlining
pecific actions which can legally and effectively be taken to
ttract county property owners to be Section 8 landlords.
ommittee Re resentation: The Section 8 Advisory Committee should
onsist of up to five members.
Section 8 Landlord (property owners)
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or
Virginia Housing Development Authority (VHDA) Section 8
Representative
Section 8 Housing Advisory Board Representatives
Representative from financial, insurance or development fields
to address long-term scenarios and costs.
he County Housing Office/Social Services will participate with
his committee as facilitator. Additional input and expertise can
e obtained by the committee as deemed necessary through guest
peakers, public forums, etc.
ommittee Term: The committee would perform it charge in
pproximately six months: March, 1993 - September, 1993.
ommittee staffin: Primary staff assistance will be provided by
he County Housing Office/Social Services as facilitator. The
epartment of Planning and Community Development and/or the County
ousing Resource Planner at the Thomas Jefferson Planning District
Commission will provide any additional administrative support.
ide for Committee's Work: The following is an informal outline
guide the work of the committee:
I.
II.
Appointment of Committee
Committee Informed on Section 8 Process/HUD
Regulations
Issues and Problems Identified
- Public forum for input
- Topics, such as:
o Reduce landlord costs
o Streamline landlord administrative efforts
o Create an additional security deposit pool
o Insurance bonds for security deposits
o Tenant training classes
o Methods to raise HUD's Fair Market Rate
March
March
II.
April
~
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
III.
IX.
o Increasing the county allocation of Section
8 units
o Increasing other government funds for
assisted rental housing
Options and Alternatives Generated
Evaluating Alternatives: How implementable;
fair, legally and economically feasible;
possible impacts or conflicts
Draft Recommendations and Priorities
Public Forum on Draft Report
Finalize Report of Specific Recommendation
Meet with Planning Commission in Work Session
May
May
June
July
July
August
--I .
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
o F
I N TEN T
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
unty, Virginia, does hereby state its intent to amend all
plicable sections of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to
quire a special use permit for all towers, whether mUlti-legged
monopole; and
FURTHER requests the Albemarle County Planning Commission to
ld public hearing on said intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance,
d does request that the Planning Commission send its recommenda-
on to this Board within 45 days.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
wr'ting, is a true, correct copy of a resolution of intent
un nimously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Co nty, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on March 3, 1993.
.-
( /-
. _ __ / t i\.._ LU . {c (.)
cle~k~ Board of Coyhty Supervisors
/"'\ ....1/ - ~ ",-,
C' - c1G <1...:)
13. ($03. (61)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
O€pt. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-45%
(804) 2%-5823
I1EM RANDUM
TO:
RE:
Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community
Development
Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner )r~}
February 16, 1993
Agricultural and :?orestal Industries Support Committee
Chiles, the orchard representative, has asked to be removed
the committee because of prior commitments during the
sday evening meeting time. I have asked Joseph Henley, III
eplace her, and he has agreed. Will you please convey this
ge to the Board of Supe~visors?
k you.
mem
L'.
f"".' :': /'~,
FEB 1 '1 1983
~',- ,
~, L..
,"
't,
-,,// .-
- _ t-) 4; .. '/3'
0:< _ "
IV'('::~0 / _)
.\5.{?
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
fMORANDUM
Tf:
F1ROM:
I
I
D~TE:
I
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community DevelopmentLJUJ~
February 25, 1993
Upsizing Water Line To Serve Stone Robinson School
an agreement between the County and the Albemarle County Service
thority (ACSA), the ACSA is to notify the Planning Director whenever it
oposes to oversize water or sewer lines near the Jurisdictional Area
undaries. The Authority has notified staff of its proposal to oversize a
ter line to Stone Robinson Elementary School.
e purpose of the extension of water to Stone Robinson is to provide a public
ter supply with adequate fire protection for the school. This would require
eight inch line. Oversizing the line to twelve inches would allow that
line to accommodate development in the area west of the Rivanna Village
to Route 729 should the Rivanna Village ever be expanded to this
e Authority's desire to oversize the line is based on the cost efficiencies
oversizing the line during initial construction rather than having to
p ovide the additional capacity at some time in the future, if needed.
I
The Comprehensive Plan recommendations for the Rivanna Village state the
fbllowing:
"Areas north of Interstate 64 have historic/scenic significance to the
County and region (including possible designation as a Rural Historic
District and have large acreage in an Agricultural/Forestal District).
To preserve and protect these resources, do not expand the Village
boundaries north of U.S. Route 250 East, west of Route 22, nor south of
the Rivanna River.
..
#
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
~age 2
rebruary 25, 1993
To further preserve and protect these resources, water lines should be
sized to serve the Village and Stone Robinson School only (emphasis
added). Capacity shall be reserved for a potential new school in the
Village until such time as determined that the school is not necessary."
(amended to the Plan, August 29, 1989)
ecause recommendations of the Plan are quite clear concerning s~z~ng of
tility lines, the Board should be aware of and take action regarding the
roposal of Albemarle County Service Authority.
taff comments are as follows:
The Authority's proposal is based on cost implications of possibly
having to provide service to this area at some time in the future.
Upsizing the line does not affect the capacity of the water line serving
the Rivanna Village.
The Board of Supervisors controls the location and timing of future
development through the Comprehensive Plan amendment process. The Board
also controls the extension of water and sewer service through the
approval of ACSA Jurisdictional Area boundaries. At this time only the
Village of Rivanna and Stone Robinson School site are within the
Jurisdictional Area (the Village for water and sewer service, the school
site for water only).
The recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Rivanna
outline specific limits to the expansion of the Village. The additional
capacity built into the line would be available to serve an area that is
within these limits.
The Authority's practice has traditionally been to upsize lines to meet
potential demands as reflected by the Comprehensive Plan as well as
possible growth beyond the 20-year Comprehensive Plan horizon.
ased on the above, staff believes the upsizing of the water line to Stone
obinson is consistent with past practice and practical long range planning.
S ould the Board permit this upsizing, staff would recommend that the wording
egarding the sizing of utility lines for the Stone Robinson School be deleted
ring the upcoming review of the Comprehensive Plan.
I
D B/jcw
..
.
ALmEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY
p.o. Bbx 1009 401 MciNTIRE RD. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 (804') 296-5810
RECEIVED
January 15, 1993
J;\i\i 1 q \4'-' 1
....\.. J t / J...
Planning DBpt
Mr. Wayne cilimberg
Director of Planning &
Community Development
County Office Building
Charlot~esville, VA
Re: Water line to stone-Robinson School
Dear Wayne:
In a previous agreement with the Board of Supervisors
the Service Authority is to notify you whenever it proposes
to oversize a water or sewer line near the perimeter of our
jurisdictional area for possible future service beyond the
boundary. I am advising you that I will recommend to the
Board of Directors on January 21, 1993 that the Service
Authority require the County of Albemarle to oversize the
eight inch water line proposed to be installed to serve
Stone-Robinson School. Should the boundary of Rivanna
Village ever shift westward to Route 729 a twelve inch
water line in Route 729 would likely be necessary to deliv-
er adequate service within that area.
ing.
Please let me know if you object to what I am propos-
Very truly yours,
,5id
J.W. Brent
Executive Director
JWB/lbt
It
,
. VILLAGE OF RIVANNA
LOCA ION
Riv nna is located east of the City of Char-
lottesvi Ie and south of Route 250 East. The
southw stern boundary is formed by the Ri-
vanna iver. The western boundary is formed
by an unnamed stream just east of Camp
branch The northern boundary is formed by
Route 50. The eastern boundary is formed by
Carrol Creek.
EXIS 'NG LAND USE
Riv nna was designated as part of Rural
Areas previously in the Plan. The area con-
sists 0 low density residential and agricultural
uses. e existing population is estimated to be
220.
Th Village of Rivanna includes: 75 dwell-
ing uni s; one church; and one upholstery busi-
ness.
Sto e Robinson Elementary School is lo-
cated j st west of the Village off Route 729.
Clifton, which now serves as an inn, is listed on
the Vi ginia Register of Historic Properties
and is also located on Route 729 adjacent to
the Vil age. While no commercial area exists
in the Village, there are currently three con-
venien e stores located along Route 250 be-
tween Route 22 and the County line. In
additio , the Village is located approximately
four m 'les from a major shopping center and
other mmercial areas on Pantops Mountain
(Urban Neighborhood Three).
I
ENVI40NMENT AL CHARA CTERISTICS
Th~ area is largely wooded with open
spaces lalong 250 and adjacent to the Rivanna
River'jAS the Village develops, it will most
likely e orientated toward the river, rather
than R ute 250. There is extensive floodplain
along he Rivanna River, Carroll Creek and
I
other streams. The Rivanna River is a State
designated Scenic River. Along the Rivanna
River exist ruins of the canal connecting Char-
lottesville to the Kanawha Canal along the
James River.
The soils in the Rivanna Village are classi-
fied in the Manteo-Nason-Tatum Association.
Manteo soils have moderate limitations for de-
velopment due to drainage problems. In addi-
tion, Manteo soils have a very shallow depth to
bedrock of 10-20". Development may be more
costly or difficult due to the required excava-
tion of rock. Nason/Tatum soils have few limi-
tations for development.
ROADS
Access to the Urban Area is good via either
Interstate 64 or Route 250. Improvements
which widen Route 250 to five lanes (undi-
vided) are planned between the Shadwell Inter-
state 64 interchange and Route 20, and seven
lanes divided from Route 20 to High Street, in-
cluding a replacement of Free Bridge.
RECOMMENDATIONS
· Preserve the extensive floodplain and criti-
cal slopes along the Rivanna River, Carroll
Creek and other streams as open space.
Protect the unique scenic and historic char-
acteristics of the river with the development
of the Village.
· Areas north of Interstate 64 have his-
toric/scenic significance to the County and
region (including possible designation as a
Rural Historic District and have large acre-
age in an Agricultural/Forestal District).
To preserve and protect these resources, do
not expand the Village boundaries north of
u.s. Route 250 East, west of Route 22, nor
south afthe Rivanna River.
· To further preserve and protect these re-
sources, water lines should be sized to serve
tI'
.
t e Vii/age and Stone Robinson School only.
apacity shall be reserved for a potential
ew school in the Village until such time as
etermined that the school is not necessary.
· 0 development of properties above current
llowable zoning densities shall be permit-
t d unless public water and sewer are made
va ilab Ie. Ultimate gross density with the
rovision of water and sewer is not to ex-
ed Vii/age density as described under
esidential Land Use Designations.
· esidential development and dwelling unit
pe shall be limited to single-family de-
t ched.
· xisting local convenience commercial uses
i combination with the proximity of Urban
rea commercial uses are sufficient to serve
t e Vii/age. No commercial uses are recom-
ended in the Vii/age.
· onsider development proposals under a
panned development approach to allow for
t e coordinated planning of utilities, public
fi cilities and roads necessary to support the
e tire Growth Area.
· ccess within the Vii/age between Route
2 0 and the Rivanna River is currently lim-
i d to roads which do not connect. An in-
t rnal road network should be provided as
a alternative to Route 250 and is to be in-
c rporated into development proposals.
· A this area should jUnction as a public
s rvice center for the eastern part of the
ounty, necessary public facilities are to be
I cated consistent with objectives and
s rategies of the Community Facilities Plan.
TABLE SIA
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
VILLAGE OF RIV ANNA
DEVELOPABLE DWELLING
ACREAGE UNITS
Village Residential 1218
RESIDENTIAL SUBTOTAL 1218
NON-RESIDENTIAL SUBTOTAL 0
UNDEVELOPED LAND - TOTAL 12189
Source: Albemarle County Department of
Planning and Community Development, 1990
883
883
o
883
.,
,.
AL EMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY
PO B x 1009 401 MciNTIRE RD. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 (804) 296-5810
February 25, 1993
Mr. David Benish
Chief of Community Development
County Office Building
Charlottesville, Virginia
Re: stone-Robinson School Water Line
Dear David:
This is to follow up on our recent conversation con-
cerning this project. Attached are copies of minutes of
previous Board of Supervisors' meetings at which this issue
in general was considered. It has been this previous
action of the Board of Supervisors that has guided the
Service Authority in similar matters for the past decade.
An eight inch water line is adequate to meet the
requirements of the school but of little value in reinforc-
ing the Glenmore system in a future "loop" or if extended
for future service to other properties. Since the useful
life expectancy of this pipeline is in excess of 100 years
it seems prudent to invest a few more dollars now to avoid
the expense of replacing or duplicating this pipeline at
some time in the future.
The County opened bids on this project today and the
apparent low bid for the twelve inch pipeline was
$46,433.20 compared to $42,823.90 for an eight inch pipe-
line. The difference in cost of $3609.30 (to be borne by
the Service Authority) is justified in my opinion.
Please let me know if you need additional information.
Very truly yours,
~
J.W. Brent
Executive Director
JWB/lbt
c.c: Board of Directors
:.
~.~
t:/
'. -.~. 2
~ :: [1
) b'S'j
:,",..., ~
f- 1
Appalachian Power Company
PO Box 1000
Lynchburg VA 245051000
804 522 4800
::
APPALACHIAN
POWER
Ms. Jo Higgins
Director of Engineering
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
March 9, 1993
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Per our telephone conversation, I am enclosing the original easement
dated March 4, 1993 that was executed by Mr. David P. Bowerman,
Chairman of The Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County.
Also enclosed is a new easement to be executed by Mr. Bowerman in
place of the March 4th easement he signed. The heading on the front
sheet has been changed to reflect the correct status of Albemarle
County as a Virginia municipality and not a corporation as shown on
the easement signed on March 4, 1993.
In addition, after "Drawing No. A-4567 dated May 30, 1991", we added
the words "Revised January 29, 1993" to correspond with the dates shown
on the drawing itself.
If this is acceptable, please have Mr. Bowerman execute the new easement
and destroy the one dated March 4, 1993.
If more information is needed or any questions, please call me at
1-800-522-4910, Monday through Friday. I apologize for the inconvenience
caused by this, but this should give us a correct easement for recordation.
Thank you for your time and assistance in this matter.
Very truly yours,
_'T-?/J~
/~^,. ~V
Paul R. Keys
Right of Way Agent
skc
Enclosures
,
Eas No.
W.O. No.
Line
R/W Map No.
756-0011 Job No. 93-
Jeffrey Allen Haney
3879-743
Prop No.
THIS AGREEMENT, made this
day of
, 1993
and between COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE. a Virginia Municipality organized and existing
David P. Bowerman Chairman,
Board of Su ervisors
herein called "Grantors", whether one or more persons, and APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, a
irginia corporation, herein called "Appalachian",
ITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00). cash in hand paid to Grantors by
ppalachian, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Grantors hereby grant, convey, and warrant to
ppalachian, its successors, assigns, lessees and tenants, a right of way and easement for an electric
ower line or lines, and communication lines, in, on, along, through, over, across or under the following
escribed lands of the Grantors situated in Scottsvi 11 e
istrict,Countyof Albemarle (Tax Map 121) ,Stateof
Parcel 82A2
S. E. Mawyer
Jeffrey Allen Haney
Douqlas C. Wain, Jr.
Virginia, and bounded:
n the North by the lands of
n the East by the lands of
n the South by the lands of
n the West by Xlx~~~t<
Spc:onnary Highway Nllmhpr 715
his easement extends in a southeasterl y direction from
ppalachian's existing pol e numbered 743-26 )(~
~~~~~m~~R~YYXYXxxyxxyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyXXX~~~~xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All as shown on Appalachianls Drawing No. A-4567 dated May 30, 1991, revised
-29-93, attached hereto and made a part hereof. This is a 10 foot wide easement.
TOGETHER with the right, privilege and authority to Appalachian, its successors, assigns, lessees and
enants, to construct, erect, install, place, operate, maintain, inspect, repair, renew, remove, add to the
umber of, and relocate at will underground conduits, ducts, vaults, cables, wires, transformers, pedestals,
isers, pads, fixtures, and appurtenances (hereinafter called "Appalachian's Facilities") in, on, along,
hrough, across and under the above referred to premises; the right to disturb the surface of said premises
nd to excavate thereon, and to cut down, trim, clear, and/or otherwise control, and at Appalachian's
ption, remove from said premises, brush, undergrowth, trees, tree roots, shrubs, buildings, or other
bstructions which may endanger the safety of, or interfere with the use of, Appalachian's Facilities; and
he right of ingress and egress to and over said above referred to premises, and any of the adjoining lands
f the Grantors at any and all times, for the purpose of exercising and enjoying the rights herein granted,
nd doing anything necessary or useful or convenient in connection therewith.
It is understood and agreed between the parties hereto, that the Grantors reserve the right to use said
nds in any way not inconsistent with the rights herein granted.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto Appalachian Power Company, its successors, assigns,lessees
nd tenants.
I
..
It is agreed that the foregoing is the entire contract between the parties hereto, and that this written
~greement is complete in all its terms and provisions.
v:"TNESS the fOIIOW'j9 signalures and seals. !U1ffl OF A;2MARlE
1~/lL (,()DiAI_ ISEAL)B~./~~A-
____ (SEAL) David P. Bowenman
I
I
(SEAL)
X(WlQX)
(SEAL)
Chainman. Board of Supervisor~l~
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
S~ATE OF \\ ~'\(~l\"\ ~ C\
I (\ \ To-wit:
rlOUNTY OF \"\ '\ \H. ~'cr'\C\.'1 ~
'1 \1'1~
I The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ \
1!:lC\--) ,by David P. Bowerman. Chairman. Board of Supervisors
Countv
day of r<\~I-f ~ ,
- Albemarle
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
~y Commission expires:
~ hI \~"-I
\ (For W. Va. Only)
IDECLARATION OF CONSIDERATION OF VALUE
U~der the penalties of fine and imprisonment as
pr vided by law the undersigned (grantee) hereby
d cia res the total consideration for the property trans-
fe red by this document is ($ l.
Given under my hand this day of
I ,19____.
I APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
I
I
I
B~
\Jl\5"~\s- \'<\' S\r\Ir
Notary Public/Commissi e
(For W. Va. Only)
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED
By
GfW 255-UNDGRD-AP (Page 2)
,
I
I
I
I
.'
EXISTING VERHEAD
ELECTRIC FACILITIES
..
co
...
...
~
...
u
;!;
ui
Ul
:;
0..
~
(/)
oJ
<
Sol
Z
J:
o
I!!
..
i ~
o
(.-rr, .:.- .'
... .', ~_ t...
S. E. MAWYER
IRON
STONE
PILE
IRON
JEFFREY ALLEN
HANEY
IRON
DOUGLAS C. WAIN, JR.
" ""
1-29-93
CHANGED ROUTE OF FACILITIES
~,
DATE
REVISION
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
MAP SHOWING PROPOSED
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
FACILITIES TO BE INSTALLED ON
THE PROPERTY OF THE COUNTY
OF ALBEMARLE NEAR KEENE, VA.
FACILITIES TO SERVE NEW"
ES DENCE OF JEFFREY ALLEN
~""WN n T.A.M./M.C.A DAn .5-30-91
APP..V G. WINGFIELD .~AU 1M - 200'
.HtEn
O~
.HlElET8
DRAWING No. A-4567
I.LJ
...J
0::
~
I.LJ
if)ct:J
I cr:...J
<l:CC
-'
-'u..
q 80
z ~ '"
0 0
f=
<l: a 0
u z
"- ~~ 0 E
if) z
if) cr:'-.q I >- .- .2
<l: ~~ M f- a;
'" -' 'I cr: 0-
n; U W
0-
0 owl 0
~~ 0 cr:
Z 0-
n
0
-,
>,
f- +'
Z C
::l a ::l a
0 a 0 a
~ u
a: <l: .-l .-l
W <F) <lJ
I
0 ~I
::J
0 E
> <lJ
I Ll ZW
l'Jcr:
(/) _W
<( if) I
0
>-
I--
I--
W
0.. u
'"
n;
u
C
'" 0
E
if) '" Z
'"
-' 0> -'"
<l: U
>- I-- <l: .c
Z W >. U>
<( 0 '" '"
~ u a
~o...
~2 (; c a
Qj .-l
'0 1: 0- '"
COo 01 >- >
a 0
~a: Ii c n a n
.2 0 € u <l:
a:W Vi iii u
c '" 0.. U '"
~S c '" a. C Ui
0 X 0
0...0 1ii W a: rO .::;
~o... U>
a; (; (; <lJ E
<(Z u -' ~
u; '" '" <l: c
W<( c E E f- a (;
0 '" '" 0
'- - u Z Z
a:I f- c
'0 .",
~<( O~ 0
N-.J W'" W
<( 2:0.. >
S 0
0... W= cr:
a: 0... U" 0-
CJ <( W"- 0..
cr:E <l:
,:j - ....:;~; - ('3
c~)?, .- ..-' /'-- 3)
1 J UX-;). b:7.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5861
MEMORANDUM
Board of Supervisors
Robert Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering A~ \-\~'\~'\\:., /\;).5\"'<.\
Keene Parcel / TMP 121-82A2
24 February 1993
is parcel was originally purchased by the County for use as a
ansfer station near Keene Landfill. Attached is a utilities
sement deed with plat for the referenced parcel. The deed is to
nvey a 10 foot wide underground electric power easement to
palachian Power Company. The purpose of this easement is to
tend the electric service from Route 715 to serve Mr. Haney's
jacent parcel.
e deed form is a routine document which I have forwarded to
orge st. John for review. The plat adequately locates the
sement along the property per my request. This will preclude
y additional future expense to the County for relocating an
derground line to accommodate future development of this parcel.
Mr. Wingfield of APCO has advised that it is critical to have this
easement executed and returned as soon as possible in order for
AP 0 to meet Mr. Haney's schedule for power to his residence.
to request that the Board authorize the Chairman to
of the owner which is the County of
If you have any questions, please advise.
George st. John
FAX (804) 972-4060
..
.i, (A)j)
GRW 256-UNDGRD-AP (8-66) - CORPORATION~.\ ~\>
un of Al bemarl e Eas No. \x ~/W M P No. 3879-743
r vi 11 e w.o. No. 756' DOll ~Job o. 93- Prop No.
Line
THIS AGREEMENT, made this
and between BOARD OF SUPERVISORS -
,1993
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the St te of Vi rgi ni a
, herein called "Grant r", and APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, a
Virginia corporation, herein called "Appalachian",
ITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the sum of One ollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid to Grantor by
ppalachian, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowled ed, Grantor hereby grants, conveys, and warrants
t Appalachian, its successors, assigns, lessees and nants, a right of way and easement for an electric
p wer line or lines, and communication lines, in, n, along, through, across or under the following
d scribed lands of the Grantor situated in .
istrict, County of A 1 bemarl e (Tax Map 121 ,
Parcel 82A2)
S. E. Maw e
Jeffre Al
Dou las C.
n the North by the lands of
n the East by the lands of
n the South by the lands of
n the West by Nm<~
Virginia, and bounded:
his easement extends in a
ppalachian's existing
a !ilXAlltud:trxg:xre
All as shown on Appalachian'
ereto and made a part hereof. Th s
direction from
numbered 743-26 xt()X
oooo~~xooixxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Drawing No. A-4567 dated May 30, 1991, attached
is a 10 foot wide easement.
TOGETHER with the right, privilege nd authority to Appalachian, its successors, assigns, lessees and
t nants to construct, erect, install, pia e, operate, maintain, inspect, repair, renew, remove, add to the
umber of, and relocate at will undergr und conduits, ducts, vaults, cables, wires, transformers, pedestals,
isers, pads, fixtures, and appurtena~ces (hereinafter called "Appalachian's Facilities") in, on, along,
hrough, across and under the above ~eferred to premises; the right to disturb the surface of said premises
nd to excavate thereon, and to cut down, trim, clear, and/or otherwise control, and at Appalachian's option,
emove from said premises, brush, undergrowth, trees, tree roots, shrubs, buildings or other obstructions
hich may endanger the safety of, or interfere with the use of, Appalachian's Facilities; and the right of
ingress and egress to and over said above referred to premises, and any of the adjoining lands
f the Grantors at any and all times, for the purpose of exercising and enjoying the rights herein granted,
nd doing anything necessary or useful or convenient in connection therewith.
It is understood and agreed between the parties hereto, that the Grantor reserves the right to use said
I nds in any way not inconsistent with the rights herein granted.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto Appalachian Power Company, its successors, assigns, lessees
nd tenants.
.,
It is agreed that the foregoing is the entire contract between the parties hereto.~nd that this written
. /
a reement is complete in all its terms and provisions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereto affixed the day
a d year first above written.
BOARD OF SUPERVISO~~ -""-50~TY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
, / - ,/ "'--'-;::~
FJ~ 6/~-:C-"Yt>'::/::"-7-?t!'/' /7"~~//?-r
~XKll<< Chainman
/l/l e ~
ATTEST:
S ATE OF \ I ~\ C\'\A, ~ c\
- ...)
OUNTY OF ~ \ \\:iIJ.;,'C'\CH\ ~ X.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
To-wit:
~\~
day of
19 93
, by
of BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - COUNTY
Chairman
, a Vi rg in i a
"'-\
COI poratioFl, on bohalf of the COfJX*-atjon.
\=)av-"",\s.;. \\\, S\\i1~\5tr
Notary Public/Commissr6n r
(For W. Va. Only)
DECLARATION OF CONSIDERATION OF V~LUE
/
U der the penalties of fine and imprisorynent as
p ovided by law the undersigned (grante~) hereby
d clares the total consideration for the proq'erty trans-
f rred by this document is ($ j.
G ven under my hand this ,day of
1,19_.
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
(For W. Va. Only)
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED
By
B
GRW 256-UNDGRD-AP (Page 2)
"
EXISTING VERHEAD
ELECTRIC FACILITIES
...
'"
...
.
..
...
~
u;
w
:J
B:
::l
fI)
-'
-c
y
z
~
....
..
~
c
, .,!". .:., .
',;- ,; ~
.~~ IRON Ii
~
~
~~
S. E. MAWYER
IRON
STONE
PILE
DOUGLAS C. WAIN, JR.
IRON
JEFFREY ALLEN
HANEY
1-29-93
DATE
CHANGED ROUTE OF FACILITIES
REVISION
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
MAP SHOWING PROPOSED
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC .
FACILITIES TO BE INSTALLED ON
THE PROPERTY OF THE COUNTY
OF ALBEMARLE NEAR KEENE, VA.
FACILITIES TO SERVE NEW"
RESIDENCE OF JEFFREY ALLEN
pUWN.V T.A.M./M.C.A. DATIl: 5-30-91
A""..V G. WINGFIELD ~AU I- - 200'
.HEET
01"
.HEne
DRAWING NO. A- 4567
OQ.
>
- LI.J
.....I
0:::
~
(/)LI.J
a:CQ
:).....1
...J<
0
Ou..
z CD I 0
0 0
~ I >-
ci I-
0 Z I :z:
iI: 0 E ::;)
(jj z 2 I 0
(/) >- u
c( I h;r- I
...J Q;
CI> 0 (V')
ftj w ~
0'\ Q.
0 0
ci a:
z Q.
.0
0
..,
I- ~ 0
z 0
::>
0
a: ~
c(
w ~
I
()
::::>
0
>
I
(/)
<:
()
>-
I--
I--
W
n. al
ftj
"0
C
CI> ci
E
(/) Sl Z
...J <;,
>- ~ c(
Z w ~
~ct 0 ~
~~ '0 0
roO E 0 CI>
>
>() Ol 0
a: c: .0
0>0:: .E 0 ~ 0 c(
o::W "in 0 al
~?: c: CI>
c: CI> 0- Ui
a.0 0 :B e "0 ::J
<fa. "ti; Q. s::: II>
Q; '0 '0 10 E
<fz "0 ...J CI>
"in CI> CI> ~ OJ::
W<: c: E E
-.... - 0 '" '" 0 s::: 0
0:: I 0 z Z I- ac
'() CI>
~<: o~ 0
C\/ ....J w'" w
?:ct >Q. >
ijj= 0
0:: a. o:J a:
w'" Q.
C)<: Q.
a:E c(
~
r! /) .r) I - c,l3
u?') - ::.::x, G;
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA
ISTEA -
Efficie
Surface Transportation
March 3, 1993
C/3. o8cJ5. (5 L{)
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
for local
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:~
STAFF C
Messrs.
Brandenburger, Cilimberg
REVIEWED BY:
Yes (1)
1
ATTACIlMEHTS:
ROUND:
ew federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) governing
ce transportation systems became law in December 1991. Its purposes are to
ve national mobility and competitiveness. It also gives local governments
cedented flexibility in developing local transportation needs. How this complex
ar reaching legislation will be implemented and how this will affect local
nment's role is not fully known as the regulations at the federal and state level
till evolving. A very recent example of the dynamics of this evolution was the
ation, and lack of information, in making recommendations to you regarding the
nation of local roads for the new National Highway System (NHS). In an effort to
he Board apprised of these changes, staff will provide periodic updates on ISTEA
a focus on the impact at the local level. The attached information from the
al Highway Administration is provided as an overview of ISTEA.
Anot er facet of ISTEA is the requirement for states to set aside at least ten percent
of t eir share of the Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds to enhance
trans ortation systems. Each state is allowed to develop its own program. VDOT has
a draft of their program out for comment and should finalize this program soon as the
fili g deadline for enhancement projects for CY 1993 is July 1st. Staff is reviewing
the raft Enhancement Program guidelines and will be developing recommended projects
for f ture consideration.
RECO ATION:
None, provided for information.
93.02
o
Message By
Administrator T. D. Larson
Opportunities for Local Governments
On December 18, 1991, President Bush
signed the Intennodal Surface Transpor-
tation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991.
Along with the clear purpose to improve national
mobility and national competitiveness, this landmark
legislation gives local governments unprecedent~d
flexibility in developing a mix of highway, transit,
and other alternatives to address transportation and
community needs.
It should be recognized by local officials that this
decision-making flexibility carries with it a great
deal of responsibility. because provisions of the
ISTEA require State and local officials to w?rk .
together in selecting projects. At the same tIme, It
will enhance the ability of local decisionmakers to
achieve a balance of highway and transit
improvements appropriate to their ind.ividual areas,
address environmental concerns, and Improve
intennodal connections.
I am confident that local officials will be pleased by
the numerous opportunities for their involvem~nt
throughout the ISTEA. This publication descnbes
some of those opportunities.
T. D. Larson
Administrator
INTRODUCTION
The Intennodal Surface Transportation Efticiency
Act (lSTEA) of 1991. in addition to providing
significantly higher levels of funding than previous
acts, made some important changes to the Federal-
aid Highway Program. Under the ISTEA, State and
local governments have an opportunity to use
authorizations that average about 50 percent more
per year ($25 billion versus $17 billion) than the
1987 Surface Transportation and Relocation
Assistance Act The IS TEA also provides one more
year of funding than the 1987 act for a total of
$152 billion for highway ($121 billion) and transit
($31 billion) programs over a 6-year period.
Of even greater consequence, however, the ISTEA
also restructured the Federal-aid Highway Program,
giving a wide range of opportunities for local
government officials to participate in decisions
regarding transportation programs. New provisions
for statewide and metropolitan planning involve both
State and local governments in the development of
long- and short-range improvement plans. Also, the
ISTEA requires the State transportation agency to
cooperate or consult with local governments,
including metropolitan planning organizations
(MPOs), on project selection and implementation.
Other provisions require a State to make available to
local communities a certain portion of its Federal-aid
highway apportionments.
These provisions and requirements give local
officials a great deal of latitude in deciding where to
use the ISTEA authorizations. But they also give
local officials greater flexibility deciding how to use
the funds, because there is now a wider range of
activities eligible for funding.
It is important for local communities to recognize
that they now can playa major role in designing
improvement programs to meet their particular
transportation needs, and in selecting the projects to
implement those programs. The sections that follow
describe the provisions that should be of particular
interest to local officials.
HE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
T e ISTEA established a major new Federal-aid
s stem, the National Highway System (NHS). It is
th centerpiece of the newly structured Federal-aid
H ghway Program and will be the central focus for
th program well into the next century. The
S cretary of Transportation is directed to develop the
N S in cooperation with the States and local areas.
It ill include the Interstate System, other routes
id ntified for their strategic defense characteristics,
ro tes providing access to major ports, airports,
p blic transportation and intermodal transportation
fa ilities, and, of particular significance to local
g vernments, principal arterials that provide regional
se Ice.
In addition to the NHS, the ISTEA authorizes use of
F deral highway funds on highways known as
F deral-aid roads, although they are no longer
o lcially a "Federal-aid system." The Federal-aid
ro ds are those not on the NHS, but that provide
i portant regional highway service. Both the NHS
d the Federal-aid roads will be identified through a
pr cess called functional classification, whereby all
p blic roads and streets are classified according to
th service they provide. The IS TEA requires the
S tes, with input from local and regional officials, to
d this classification.
ignation
e proposed NHS will be developed by the States
in cooperation with local and regional officials based
o guidelines established by the Secretary of
T sportation and on the functional reclassification.
e States and the MPOs, as well as other local
o lcials, have the flexibility to propose routes if they
ar consistent with the objectives of the NHS. This
c perative designation process is well under way.
e involvement of local officials in the
d elopment of the proposed NHS is emphasized in
th ISTEA and the instructions issued by the Federal
.ghway Administration (FHWA). The States are
r uired to seek, encourage, and provide
o ortunities for the cooperative involvement of
2
local officials in the development of the NHS,
including representatives of affected Indian tribal
governments and land-owning Federal agencies.
The proposed system is to be submitted to the
Congress by December 18, 1993, and the Congress
is to take action on approving the system by
September 30, 1995.
FUNDING
As part of the overall program restructuring, the
ISTEA also repealed the Federal-aid Primary,
Secondary, and Urban Systems and their associated
funding categories. In their place, three new
categories of assistance were established: the
National Highway System, the Surface
Transportation Program (STP), and the Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program
(CMAQ). Other major categories, such as the
Interstate Maintenance (formerly known as the
Interstate 4R Program), Bridge, Federal Lands, and
Emergency Relief Programs, are continued under the
ISTEA. Also, the Interstate Construction Program is
funded for 4 more years, which should complete the
financing of the Interstate System.
The NHS is funded at $38 billion over the 6-year
period of the Act, including $17 billion for the
Interstate Maintenance Program. The STP is
authorized at more than $37 billion (counting the
special equity adjustment funds that are used under
the STP). and CMAQ at $6 billion. The Bridge
Program funding has been greatly increased to over
$16 billion for the 6 years.
-~
The STP funds may be used on either NHS or
Federal-aid roads, although bridge, safety, carpool-
related, and bicycle/pedestrian projects may be on
any public road. Importantly, the funds may be used
for mass transit projects, among other eligible
activities. Another important and far-reaching
provision for local government concerns the
requirement that a State must distribute 50 percent of
its STP apportionment to urban areas with over
200,000 population and to other areas of the State
3
"
base on population. Rural areas of the State (less
than ,000 population) are guaranteed an amount
based on previous Secondary Program funding.
Anot er 30 percent may be used in any area of the
State. Half of the other 20 percent must be used for
Safet Construction activities and half for
Trans ortation Enhancement activities.
The I TEA also makes Bridge Program funding
significant to local governments. A provision from
previ us law was continued that requires at least 15
perce t of a State's bridge apportionment to be used
for bri ge projects on roads that are classified as
local d rural minor collectors. In other words,
these nds are for use on roads where Federal
bridge funds otherwise are not available.
Also, t e CMAQ Program, which directs funds
prim ly to areas that have failed to attain certain air
quality standards, allows a variety of programs and
project to achieve its objectives. These include mass
transit mprovements and high-occupancy vehicle
faciliti s.
These nding programs, along with the expanded
involv ment of local officials in the planning and
project selection process, give local governments a
strong ole in determining where and how to use
large aunts of Federal highway funding.
The IS A provides a wide range of eligible
activiti s to which funds may be addressed working
through and with the States. Funding under both the
NHS STP may be used in traditional ways: to
constru t or improve roads and bridges. But the
funds y also be used in nontraditional ways, e.g.,
bicycle acilities and pedestrian walkways, carpool
and van I projects, and fringe and corridor
parking acilities.
The ad tional flexibility is most prevalent in the
STP, but is available in other programs such as the
NHS as ell. Funds under the NHS, for example,
may be sed to pay the startup costs for traffic
manage ent and control projects. NHS funding also
4
1
r
J
,
~
allows construction of a project on a non-NHS
highway and construction of any transit project that
is eligible under the Federal Transit Act as long as
this kind of project:
I) is in the corridor of a fully access-controlled
NHS facility,
2) will improve the level of service of the NHS
facility, and
3) is more cost-effective than an improvement
on the NHS facility.
In addition to those listed above, STP funds may be
used for capital and operating costs of traffic
management and control systems and may be used
to pay capital costs for transit projects and publicly
owned intracity or intercity bus terminals and
facilities. Similarly, other sections of the ISTEA
allow transit funds to be used for highway projects.
While providing flexibility in the STp, the ISTEA
also mandates specific funding for Safety
Construction projects and Transportation
Enhancement activities. Safety Construction
projects are for low-cost improvements to reduce
highway and rail-highway crossing hazards.
Enhancements are identified as a discrete set of
activities (e.g., bikeways, scenic highways,
preservation of historic transportation facilities, and
rails to trails initiatives) with a goal of integrating
transportation systems into communities to enhance
their livability. Local officials have an opportunity
to sponsor enhancement projects or to support
enhancement proposals by others (State, private
entities, etc.).
PLANNING
It is in the area of planning that local officials have
the greatest opportunity for involvement in the
programs funded by the ISTEA. Two major sections
of the ISTEA place great emphasis on planning by
both State and local governments. One section,
Metropolitan Planning, concerns the planning and
programming of tranSportation improvements in
urban areas with 50,000 population or more. The
other section, Statewide Planning, covers planning
5
Metropolitan planning is funded by I percent of the
funds authorized for the NHS, STP, CMAQ,
Interstate Maintenance, and Bridge Programs. In
addition, metropolitan planning is an eligible activity
under the NHS and STP. The result is a greater
resource base for the planning process. The ability
to improve technical processes, effectively use staff
capacity and resources, and develop more effective
data bases on key metropolitan trends will strengthen
the pivotal role of local officials in guiding regional
transportation investment.
,r
!
and pro amming of other transportation
improve ents throughout the State. They also must
be coordi ated with the metropolitan planning
activities.
Metropo 'tan Planning
The metr politan planning provisions of the act make
the MPO responsible for developing, in cooperation
with the tate and affected transit operators, a long-
range tr sportation plan and a transportation
improve ent program (TIP) for the metropolitan area.
The TIP ust include all highway and transit projects
in the me opolitan area that are proposed for funding
under Tit e 23 of the United States Code (USC) and
the Fede Transit Act provisions.
Statewide Planning
The planning and programming of highway and
transit improvements in the States historically have
ranged from collaborative State-local efforts to
processes having minimal involvement of local
governments. The ISTEA now requires that the
process be open and participatory in all States,
similar to that developed under Federal law for
transportation planning in metropolitan areas.
Local go ernment officials are a key constituency in
metropol tan areas and now, because of the ISTEA's
provisio s, will have an opportunity to interact to a
greater d gree with the State and other local
governm nts through the MPO. The increased
emphasi on planning under the act's provisions will
make it e ier for local officials to ensure that
transpo tion and land use decisions more
effective y fit their vision for metropolitan growth
and deve opment and, significantly for air quality
nonattai ent areas, contribute to a reduction in
vehicle e . ssions.
Section 135 of Title 23 requires the States to
undertake a continuous transportation planning
process which, at a minimum, considers 20 specific
factors such as land development goals, strategies for
incorporating bicycle transportation facilities and
pedestrian walkways in projects where appropriate,
methods to reduce traffic congestion, methods to
expand and enhance transit services, etc. Each State
is also required to develop a transportation plan that
is both long-range and multi-modal. It must be
coordinated with MPO planning, rural economic
growth, tourism development, and with Indian tribal
nations.
The plan ing process must now include
consider tions such as land use, bicycle and
pedestri needs, intermodal connectivity, methods
to enhan e transit service, and needs identified
through t e management systems required under the
act. The e key transportation components, most
often co sidered independently in the past, must
now be a proached in a more comprehensive
decision- aking fashion. As a consequence, long-
term go setting and maintenance of existing public
infrastru ture can be tied together to fashion a
regional riority list for transportation investments
that can erve locally determined critical needs.
Further, e investment strategy for improving
economi competitiveness for a given metropolitan
region c be more comprehensively integrated with
transpo tion investments.
Statewide transportation planning is funded through
an earmark of 2 percent of a State's apportionment
for the Interstate Construction, Interstate
Maintenance, Interstate Substitution, NHS, STP,
CMAQ, and Bridge Programs. At least 25 percent
of this amount must be used for research and
development programs and for technology transfer
activities. Statewide planning also is an eligible
activity under the NHS and STP.
6
7
Proj ct Selection
Proj cts in urban areas with over 200,000 population
are s lected by the MPO in consultation with the
State and transit operators, except that NHS, Bridge,
and I terstate Maintenance projects are selected by
the S te in cooperation with the MPO. In urban
areas with 50,000 to 200,000 population, projects are
selec ed by the State in cooperation with the MPO.
Alth ugh local officials will have increased
resp nsibilities, the requirement that operators of
majo modes of transportation should be included in
the d ision process will improve communication,
pool esources, and enhance collective efforts of
State and various local decisionmakers.
I) highway pavement of Federal-aid highways,
2) bridges on and off Federal-aid highways,
3) highway safety,
4) traffic congestion,
5) public transportation facilities and
equipment, and
6) intermodal transportation facilities and
systems.
For onmetropolitan areas of the State (urban areas
with ess than 50,000 population and rural areas), the
State must consult with affected local officials in
selec 'ng projects on the National Highway System
and rojects funded with Bridge and Interstate
Mai tenance Program funds. Other projects must be
selec ed by the State in cooperation with local
offic' also
The primary purpose of these management systems
is to improve the efficiency of, and protect the
investment in. the Nation's existing and future
transportation infrastructure. The management
systems are not the end products; they will provide
additional information needed by State and local
officials to make informed decisions for optimum
utilization of limited resources.
All ghway and transit projects selected for funding
unde Title 23 and the Federal Transit Act must be
inclu ed in a statewide transportation improvement
pro am (STIP) that is approved by the U. S.
Secr tary of Transportation. Projects included in the
S must be consistent with the statewide
trans rtation plan, and local officials must be
provo ed a reasonable opportunity to comment on
the p oposed STIP. Federal approval of the STIP
provo es a basis for ensuring that local government
offic'als have been given an adequate opportunity to
be in olved in the development of the statewide
trans rtation plan and program.
Section l34(f) of Title 23 and Section 8 of the
Federal Transit Act specify that MPOs, in
developing plans and programs, must consider the
transportation needs identified through use of these
management systems, and the statewide planning
process required under 23 USC l35( c) also must
consider these needs. In addition, the results of the
management systems must be considered in making
project selection decisions under Title 23 and under
the Federal Transit Act. Further, in metropolitan
areas, the systems must be developed and
implemented in cooperation with the MPOs
responsible for carrying out the metropolitan
planning process.
Man ement Systems
Clos ly related to the planning activities is the
requ' ement that States develop, establish, and
impl ment systems for managing each of the
folIo ing:
Local officials' active involvement is needed in the
development and implementation of the
management systems and in the development of
plans and programs that reflect the needs identified
through them. The extent of local involvement
undoubtedly will vary for each system and from
State to State.
8
9
OIrHER OPPORTUNITIES
The three components will be undertaken
concurrently with the objective of making this a
permanent program.
Bi ycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Thp ISTEA emphasizes the transportation as well as
the ecological value of bicycling and walking, and
ollprs mechanisms for implementing bicyclists' and
pe estrians' needs. It provides for accommodating
bie yclists and pedestrians under several
tra~sportation programs:
The committee is to develop minimum criteria and
standards for use by State and Federal agencies in
designating highways as scenic byways and all-
American roads. There are 17 members, one of
which represents local transportation officials.
~ National Highway System
~ Surface Transportation Program
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement Program
Federal Lands Highway Funds
Scenic Byways Program
The National Recreational Trails Fund
Technical assistance and grants are to be provided to
the States for the planning, design, and development
of State scenic byway programs.
Bo~ States and MPOs are required to develop
tra~sportation plans and programs which provide for
the development of pedestrian walkways and bicycle
tra sportation facilities.
Under the Interim Scenic Byways Program, grants
may be made to any State which has a scenic
highway program, for carrying out eligible projects
on highways that the State has designated as scenic
byways. This program remains in effect for fiscal
years 1992, 1993, and 1994.
Cor-gestion Pricing Pilot Program
Th~ new Congestion Pricing Pilot Program provides
fur ds for operational tests of market-based
me~hanisms, such as charging for road use at peak
tra el times, in order to reduce congestion and air
pol ution. Five such projects can be supported,
inc uding up to three on the Interstate System.
Research
An important provision relative to local govern-
ments is the establishment of a National Rural
Transportation Study Center at the University of
Arkansas to conduct research in the development,
management, and operation of intermodal
transportation systems in rural areas. The Rural
Study Center is one of five new national centers
added to the University Transportation Centers
Program (UTCs). These centers, as well as the
original 10 UTCs, are funded by both the Federal
Highway Administration and the Federal Transit
Administration.
Na ional Recreational Trails
Th ISTEA established a new program to finance the
de' elopment and improvement of recreational trails
an< for other trail-related projects. The States may
pro~ide funds to private individuals, county
go ernments, city governments, or other government
ent ties.
Education and Training
The successful Rural Technical Assistance Program
(RTAP) is expanded and continued as a local
technical assistance program by the ISTEA.
Through RTAP, new highway technologies and
technical assistance have been delivered to local
officials by a nationwide network of technology
transfer centers. The IS TEA expanded the scope so
that, in addition to rural and small urban areas,
highway technology may also be provided to urban
areas with populations in the range of 50,000 to
Na ional Scenic Byways
Anpther new effort established by the ISTEA has
thnte program components: the Scenic Byways
Ad llisory Committee, Technical Assistance
Ac ivities, and the Interim Scenic Byways Program.
10
II
I million. The ISTEA requires that at least two
techl1ology centers provide transportation technical
assi tance for American Indian tribal governments.
Als( specifically mentioned is that technical
assi tance be provided to local transportation
ager cies in pavements, bridge, and safety
man~gement systems; use of travel and tourism for
ecor omic development; and intergovernmental
tran portation planning and project selection.
CONCLUSION
Ove all, the ISTEA has provided key tools and
reso rces to local government officials, allowing
then to be more comprehensive and effective in
dire( ting their metropolitan area's future. By
utili ing these new decision resources, metropolitan
offic als can more aggressively meet local and
metrppolitan priorities.
12
'"
2_/' cl-"
- "'-?,> - ....
-- 'J
q3,o~.(5.5)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PE HTEL
COMMISSI NER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P 0, BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
February 19, 1993
Route 866
Ms. El
Board
401 Mc
Charlo
a W. Carey, Clerk
f Supervisors
ntire Road
tesville, VA 22902
Dear M . Carey:
A
review
traffi
comple
the January Board of Supervisors meeting a
the intersection of Greenbrier Drive and
engineering modifications were necessary.
and this is my report to the Board.
request was made for the Department to
Commonwealth Drive to determine what
My review of this intersection is now
e section of Commonwealth Drive south from Greenbrier Drive has recently been
cted by the county. As of this time this section has not been added to the state
ry system for maintenance. The paper work for this addition has been submitted by
ty and has cleared my office. I expect this addition to become official shortly.
r three legs of the intersection are already part of the state secondary system.
the Board's request I had the Traffic Engineer's Office review pavement markings
intersection. As a result of this review all four legs of the intersection,
g that section not yet in the system, have been marked to create a left turn lane
oaching traffic. This work was completed during the second week of February.
also requested the Traffic Engineer's Office to undertake a traffic signal study.
This udy indicates that the traffic approaching this intersection on both Greenbrier
and monwealth approach the volumes needed to meet the warrants for a traffic signal.
They a e at present, however, less than the minimums usually used to justify the
install tion of a traffic signal. Those conducting the study noted considerable
hesitat on on the part of motorists approaching the intersection. This study was made
prior 0 the installation of new pavement markings. I believe these new pavement
marking will considerably reduce the hesitation which was observed.
Ex erience has shown that installation of a traffic signal prior to the location
fully eeting the warrants leads to problems which out weigh the value of the signal.
For th's reason I am not recommending the installation of a traffic signal at this time.
I belie e the revised pavement markings along with the increased familiarity of motorists
with th intersection allows this intersection to operate satisfactorily at this time. I
will, owever, schedule this location for another study at mid year to determine if
increas d volumes over that time meet the warrants for a traffic signal.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
-~r
.r. '.
ADMINISTRATive ASSISTANT
~ongrtss of tbt Itnittb ~tatts
"OUgt of l\tprtgtntatibtg
Masbtngton, m~ 20515-4605
PUB~~ A~
TRAN~~:1~~o~. -S1'E\
SU~OM~ J --,' J
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
AVIATION
WATER RESOURCES
INVESTIGATIONS
AND OVERSIGHT
L. r. PAYNE
5TH DISTRICT, VIRGINIA
. ~
1118 LONGWORTH BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC'20515-4605
(202) 225-4711
FAX: (202) 226-1147
JIM JOHNSON
TOLL-FREE 1-80<1>-535-4008
COMMITTEE ON THE
BUDGET
February 16, 1993
Ms~ Ella w. Carey
Clerk
AI~emarle County Board of Supervisors
40~ McIntire Road
Chfrlottesville, Virginia 22902
DeCl'Lr Ms. Carey:
,
, Thank you for passing along to my office your resolution
re~arding the proposed EPA regulations on financial assurance
re~uirements as they affect local governments. I appreciated
he~ring of your concerns on this matter.
On your behalf, I have been in contact with the
Entironmental Protection Agency to determine the status of the
refulations. According to EPA, the proposed financial assurance
re ulations have been delayed by six months, and will not become
ef ective until April 9, 1994. In the meantime, EPA is working
on:a new set of proposals to provide guidance to local
governments on the manner by which they can use their good faith
an4 credit as government bodies to self assure the closure of
mu~icipal landfills.
I
,
It is my understanding that, in its current draft stage,
th~ new proposal would create a ratio test by which EPA would
eV~luate the financial soundness of government applicants.
Fi ancially sound communities would be permitted to self assure
so e or all of their anticipated closure costs, depending upon
their financial condition. Those communities not meeting the
fi~ancial test would have some options, such as collecting a
tipping fee dedicated to closure or reaching agreement with a
third party underwriter. In addition, communities operating a
re9ional facility could be authorized to pool their resources in
orqer to meet the test.
EPA expects to publish the new guidelines in proposed form
in !early spring. Once pUbliShed, there would be a 60 day
co~ent period for public input.
I have also been in contact with Rep. Mike Synar's office.
DISTRICT O~FICES:
o JENNIFER MO~REFIElD, CASEWORK SUPERVISOR
301 DAN DA~IEL P.O. BUILDING
DANVILLE, VA, 24541
TELEPHONE: (~041 792-1280
FAX: (804) 797-5942
,
I
o MARGARET WATKINS, OFFICE MANAGER
ABBITT FEDERAL BUILDING
103 SOUTH MAIN STREET
FARMVILLE, VA 23901
TELEPHONE: (804) 392-8331
FAX: (804) 392-6448
o G'lEG KEllY, DISTRICT MANAGER
P.O. Box 256
HIGHWAY 664-W
N,'LLYSFORD, VA 22958
TELEPHONE: (804)361-1558
FJ.x: (804) 361-1164
THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE OF RECYCLED FIBERS
/. ~
~
Ms Ella WI Carey -- Page 2
. Synar is chairman of the House Government Operations
ittee's Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural
ources and a member of the House Energy and Commerce
ittee, both of which have jurisdiction over EPA and its
lementation of RCRA. If the proposed guidelines do not
quately address the concerns of municipalities on this issue,
. Synar will be considering whether a legislative response
ld be appropriate.
When the guidelines are published, notification will be
t to states and other organizations to facilitate public
ute Once you have had the opportunity to review the
posal, I hope you will notify me if you continue to have
cerns, so that I can ensure that they are transmitted to EPA
that your views are available should legislative relief be
sidered.
Thank you again for sharing your concerns on this matter
wi h me.
AA~
L. F. Payne
LF Jr:mpf
.
"'
Jd-afo -(13
CJJ C?iJ3. (5"1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
ebruary 17, 1993
oger W. Ray
717 Allied street
harlottesville, Virginia 22901
OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - Section 10.3.1
(Tax Map 14, Parcel 42 - Garrison Estate)
Ray,
he County Attorney and I have reviewed the title information you
ave submitted for the above-noted property. It is the County
ttorney's advisory opinion and my official determination, that
his property consists of four (4) separate parcels all of which
re located on the east side of Route 668. They are comprised of
4.6 acres, 7 acres, 3.5 acres and 86.5 acres.
ach of these lawfully separate parcels is entitled to associated
evelopment rights. This determination results in three (3)
dditional parcels than are shown with a parcel number on the
ounty tax maps.
his determination considered the descriptive clauses of the deed,
hich delineate and enumerate the property as consisting of "all of
hose certain tracts, lots and parcels of land." This
onsideration is based on the findings of the VA Supreme Court in
he case, Faison v. Union Camp 224 VA 54.
he most recent deed of record as of the date of adoption of the
oning Ordinance is found in Deed Book 215, Page 219. It is dated
anuary 18, 1932 from R.L. and Ella F. Wood to Andrew and Cecelia
. Garrison. This deed describes the following parcels:
. That certain tract or parcel of land, containing 24 6/10 acres,
more or less, according to plat made by Hugh F. Simms in DB 165
P 371. There are five (5) potential development rights.
--
ebruary 17, 1993
oger Ray/Garrison Estate
. That certain tract or parcel of land, containing 7 acres, more
or less, lying adjacent to the west of tract #1 and fronting on
Route 668. It was conveyed to Wood by DB 167 P 270. There are
three (3) potential development rights.
. That certain tract or parcel of land, containing 3 1/2 acres,
according to plat made by B.T. Parrott in DB 175 P 484. It lies
adjacent to the east of the 24 6/10 acre tract. There is only
one development right, and therefore no right to division.
. That certain tract or parcel of land, containing 86 1/2 acres,
according to plat of B.T. Parrott in DB 181 P 449. It lies
adjacent to the north of the other three tracts, and fronts on
Route 668. There are five (5) potential development rights.
nyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
hirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have any
estion, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Jan sprinkle, Planning Department
Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Ella Carey, Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Reading Files
(3) additional parcels
ne (1) by Tax Map, four (4) by determination
~ -d{) JT3
Cf3. ()2-(/3~(5 .e)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
February 12, 1993
Roger W. Ray
1717 Allied street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
E: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - section 10.3.1
Tax Map 39, Parcel 29 (David F. Wayland, Etal, owners)
ear Mr. Ray:
he County Attorney and I have reviewed the source of title you
ave submitted for the above-noted property. It is the County
ttorney's advisory opinion and my official determination, that
his property consists of three (3) separate parcels which together
otal 35.091 acres.
ach of these lawfully separate parcels is entitled to associated
evelopment rights. This determination results in two (2)
ddi tional parcels than are shown with a parcel number on the
ounty tax maps.
his determination considered the descriptive clauses of the deed,
hich delineate and enumerate the property as consisting of three
(3) separate residue parcels. These result from off-conveyances,
r subdivisions of three original parcels. This consideration is
ased on the findings of the VA Supreme Court in the case, Faison
. Union Camp 224 VA 54. It also is based on the fact that a will,
s is the case here, does not serve to combine or otherwise
earrange property boundaries. A will is for the disposition of
wnership, unless the specific boundaries of land are called for.
he most recent deed of record as of the date of adoption of the
oning Ordinance for two of the three parcels is found in Deed Book
28, Page 280. It is dated May 10, 1973 from G. Bourne and Norma
Wayland to Quasha Partnership. This deed describes the
ollowing parcels:
./
February 12, 1993
Wayland Parcel Determination
Page 2
1. Lot #1 - The residue of a tract (called parcel V), consisting of
26.4 acres more or less, previously designated as parcel 20A on the
County Tax Map, and being the northeastern portion of the property
which was conveyed to said G. Bourne and Norma A. Wayland by
Federal Land Bank of Baltimore, by deed dated February 24, 1943,
and recorded in Deed Book 256, Page 330. It is described as a
small parcel at the southern tip thereof. This lot appears to
consist of less than four (4) acres, and is therefore entitled to
only one (1) development right, and based on that fact it may not
be further divided.
2. Lot #2 - The residue of a tract (called parcel IV), consisting
of 164.60 acres, more or less, previously designated as parcel 20
on the County Tax Map, and being the northern and larger portion of
the property which was conveyed to G. Bourne and Norma A. Wayland
by Llewellyn P. and Anne Haden, by deed dated May 26, 1945, and
recorded in Deed Book 263, Page 369. It is more specifically part
of the 99 1/2 acres designated as tract no.2 in this deed. It is
not described as to its boundary. This lot consists of at least 10
acres, and is therefore entitled to five (5) potential development
rights.
The most recent deed of record for the third parcel is found in
Deed Book 256, Page 331. It is dated February 24, 1943, and is
between The Federal Land Bank of Baltimore, and G. Bourne and Norma
A. Wayland. This deed describes the following parcel: #2
Beginning at a stone pile in James A. Gentry's line ... containing
20 1/8 acres, according to a survey made by J. T. E. Simms, S.A.C.
The third parcel is as follows:
3. Lot #3 - The residue of three (3) off-conveyances, some
involving other property as follows:
1.1 acres (DB 256 P 331)
9.8 acres (DB 265 P 94)
50.8 acres (DB 300 P 27)
~o significant points worth noting are as follows. The will gave
!the property to the four (4) children, without subdividing or
combining it. In addition, these three parcels as delineated are
~esidues of off-conveyances.
February 12, 1993
Wayland Parcel Determination
Page 3
Anyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
thirty (3D) days of the date of this letter. If you have any
question, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
sincerely,
(1trJiL )://hl ff. .IJ Iz'. -
elia G. MCCUl{:~,~
Zoning Administrator
agm
c: Jan Sprinkle, Planning Department
Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Ella Carey, Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Reading Files
o (2) additional parcel(s)
(1) by Tax Map, two (2) by determination
"
~ -~G:7-q3
C;'- . .
-13.D-3I-J3{5.Q)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4S96
(804) 296~S87S
Febr ary 22, 1993
Cha les Frankfurt
Rou e 1, Box 854
Kes ick, VA 22947
RE: OFFXCXAL DETERHXNATXON OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - section 10.3.1
TaX Map 82, parcel 3 (known in part as stanford Hall)
county Attorney and X have reviewed the information on the history
have submitted for the above-noted property. It is the county
orney's advisory opinion and my official determination, that this
perty consists of five (5) separate parcels. Of these, two (2) are
ht-of-way strips onlY 30 feet wide. These five (5) parcels are
erally described as follows:
Mr. Frankfurt:
parcel I of 157 acres; parcels 2 and 3 together amounting
to 1 acre; parcel 4 of 6 acres; and parcel 5 of 6 acres.
ch of these lawfullY separate parcelS is entitled to associated
velopment rights, if they are buildable. It is likely that given
eir dimensions, parcelS 2 and 3 are not. This determination results
four (4) additional parcelS than are shown with a parcel number on
e county tax maps.
his determination considered the descriptive clauses of the deed,
hich delineate and enumerate the property as consisting of "a certain
ract of contiauouS parcelS lying on the waters of Mechunk creek and
n both sides of the Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad, about one-half mile
ast of campbell station on said Railroad, containing 170 acres, more
r less ..." This consideration is based on the findings of the VA
upreme court in the case, Faison v. Union camp 224 VA 54. This 1977
eed further describes and enumerates the "stanford Hall" property as
eing made up of the five parcelS.
/
"
ry 22, 1993
s Frankfurt
The ost recent deed of record as of the date of adoption of the
zonin ordinance is found in Deed Book 629, page 544. It is dated
Augus 15, 1977 and is from National Bank and Trust company, trustees
unde the will of John potts Barnes, deceased, to Charles M. and Carla
G. D vis. This deed describes the following parcels:
1. A parcel of 157.4 acres, as shown on plat by Hugh F. simms recorded
i Deed Book 236, page 103. It haS five (5) potential development
ights.
2. A strip or parcel of land shown on plat in Deed Book 236, page 103,
30 feet in width and 1249 feet long, lying along and adjacent to
he southeastern line of the right of way of the Chesapeake and
hio Railroad, and extending from the western boundary of above
arcel 1 to the eastern boundary. It haS one (1) maximum potential
evelopment right, and may not be buildable.
3. certain other strip of land shown on plat in Deed Book 236, Page
103, 30 feet in width and 379 feet long lying along and adjaCent
to the southeastern line of the right of way of the Chesapeake and
Ohio Railroad. It has one (1) maximum potential development right.
and may not be buildable.
4. A parcel of 6 acres, more or lesS, described in Deed Book 297, page
479, which tract has a cemetery on it. It haS three (3) maximum
potential development rights.
5. A parcel of 6 acres, more or less, adjacent to parcels 1 and 4
aforesaid, lying northwest of state Route 686. It waS shown as
part of the 76.3 acres which is shown on a plat in Deed Book 216.
page 34.
A yone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
t irty (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have any
estion, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
incerely,
agm
cc: Jan sprinkle, Planning Department
Gay Carver, Real Estate Department
Ella Carey, Clerk, Board of supervisors
Reading Files
~
,
NOTE:
FoUr (4 additional parcellS) - twO (2) of which ~ay be unbuildable
one (1) bY Ta~ ~ap, five (5) bY determination
March 3, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
(Page 3)
Item 5.10. Copy of Final Environmental Impact statement for U.s. Route
29 Corridor Study (state Project: 6029-002-122,PE100) Albemarle County and
City of Charlottesville (on file in Clerk's office), received as information.
13~
cfJ;1 CJ 3, ~/ t::1
~.
r
CENTRAL
VIRGINIA
ELECTRIC
COOPERATIVE
.7\ -~-i(; .C1.A."':::J
<'2,.-, " :..J
Lf;":;' /.. '? ."'2 / -
!.J'v:;J(-) .&:) ,)
- '-"", ! !
February 18, 1993
rtified Mail - Return Recei t
THE COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF
PERVISORS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING COUNTIES IN WHICH CENTRAL
ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE OFFERS SERVICE, AND TO THE MAYOR AND
OF THE BELOW LISTED TOWNS IN WHICH IT OFFERS SERVICE.
Albemarle County
Amherst County
Appomattox County
Augusta County
Buckingham County
Campbell County
Cumberland County
Fluvanna County
Goochland County
Greene County
Louisa County
Nelson County
Orange County
Prince Edward County
Town of Appomattox
Town of Gordonsville
Enclosed is a copy of NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF AN APPLICATION
FRAN EXPEDITED INCREASE IN RATES BY CENTRAL VIRGINIA ELECTRIC
C OPERATIVE.
Slah
Very truly yours,
~
Howard L. Scarboro
General Manager
Post ffice Box 247. Lovingston, VA 22949. Telephone: 804/263-8336 · Fax: 804/263-8339
c
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF AN APPLICATION FOR
AN EXPEDITED INCREASE IN RATES BY
CENTRAL VIRGINIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
o February 18, 1993, Central Virginia Electric Cooperative ("CVEC")
filed an application for an expedited rate increase with the State
Corpor tion Commission. The application will propose an increase in rates
and ch rges for electric service to produce an increase in additional gross
annual evenues of $2,203,975 or 8.90%. The proposed percentage increase for
each r te schedule is as follows: Schedule A, Farm & Home, 9.95%; Schedule
B, Gene al Service, 10.70%; Schedule LP, Large Power Service, 4.31%; Schedule
I, Indu trial Service, 3.11%; Schedule SHL, Street Light Service, 9.08%. The
increase will take effect on an interim basis, subject to refund, for meter
readin s on and after May 1, 1993.
e application also will propose the following changes in CVEC's Terms
ditions for Electric Service: to provide for interest on consumer
s to be paid by crediting the consumer's account unless direct payment
to the consumer is requested; to eliminate a requirement that motors larger
than 1 horsepower be three phase; to provide for monthly billing on
bimont ly meter readings, with interim bills based on estimated consumption;
to imp se a $25 charge for service reconnect ion after normal working hours;
to pro ide that consumer contributions for unusual services and line
extens'ons shall be based on CVEC's most recently calculated average unit
cost 0 construction rather than on estimates or fixed amounts; to provide
that C EC will assist applicants for service in securing necessary rights of
way on private property, rather than having the applicants assist CVEC; to
provid for waiver of a $150 charge for the installation of temporary
facili ies if the applicant provides and installs an acceptable meter base
and con uctors for such service; and to provide that underground service will
not be Onstalled in septic fields or areas where mechanical digging cannot be
done u less the consumer provides and installs acceptable conduits.
pies of CVEC's application and the data relied upon to support the
e can be reviewed during regular business hours at CVEC's office in
ton, Virginia 22949.
y interested party has the right to request a hearing on CVEC' s
tion, and such request should be directed to the Clerk of the State
tion Commission, P. O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216, with
upon CVEC directed to its counsel, Evans B. Brasfield, Hunton &
Willia s, Riverfront Plaza- East Tower, 951 East Byrd Street, Richmond,
VirginOa 23219-4074. Such requests should be made within 60 days of the date
the in rease goes into effect, no later than June 30, 1993.
T e Commission's Staff will make an investigation of the increase and
will file its report on such investigation within six months of the filing of
the application. Subsequent to the submission of that report, CVEC will seek
to hav the expedited increase made permanent.
CENTRAL VIRGINIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
c~ -* -93
48.(J:!J:;3 ( 5 . If+ )
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
It-t~
I
February 25, 1993
Hunting Regulations
the Board's February 17, 1993 meeting, staff was instructed to
review information disseminated in the state hunting regulation
p mphlet for accuracy when compared with ordinances in effect and
a opted by the Board of Supervisors.
Testate hunting regulations pamphlet lists three regulations in
effect for Albemarle County.
#16: It is unlawful to hunt from the road with firearms.
#22: It is unlawful to possess a loaded firearm on the road
except when permission to hunt is obtained from
landowners on each side.
#30: It is unlawful to transport or possess a loaded firearm
on the road in a vehicle.
mbers 16 and 30 accurately reflect two of the four county hunting
dinances in effect. Number 22 should have been listed as #19
ich says the same thing except changes the word "firearm" to
if Ie or shotgun." This change would accurately reflect the third
our four hunting ordinances.
e fourth hunting ordinance currently in effect mirrors a state
w on a prohibition against shooting from or within 100 yards of
y public road. This statewide regulation is printed in bold
ttering within the regulations published by the state.
the County has an ordinance which prohibits discharging a
within a residential area. This is not considered to be a
regulation and would not be expected to be found within the
hunting regulations summary.
R bert W. Tucker, Jr.
F bruary 25, 1993
P ge 2
ter careful review, the County Attorney and I believe that all of
bemarle County's hunting ordinances are represented in the
ate's regulations summary and no changes are warranted other than
t advise the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries that the
l'sting for regulation #22 needs to be changed to #19. If there
a e other changes recommended by the Board, I would be happy to
a dress them. If further information is needed, please do not
h sitate to ask.
E ~ ,g06
.t:- .t: 8
~ ~ ~:2
1ii~ :a~'
-5ov .3E
ti-5 ~c;
~.~ N'-
-,,"0 e[
<::.9 '"
.t: g :€~
OV.<:: ~-
1All ... ~
";... !j.t:
o ~ "0:3
.::: E _"0
~ ~ ]]
~..8 0 \0
g-g '::13
lle ~~
:a~ -:~
-51-5 .- Vl
_ . _"0
:~];:l~ 5i1
V) U._ V) In ~
-.i5 - C v 'iloC ,- t: ' .- o,-=:s ~ u <if ..., 2 . U ~ ~
E'B i ~ ~ :l ~.s ~.~ ~ 1s:~.5~ ~ g ". a~]~-';E ~
~ "0 ~ ~ 0 0 \.,.. ...... c ~ - VJ e.o OIJ ./:) 0..-- ...
!~I I ~ 1 !i'] i 1 ~!il~~ ~ ~i~t!~ )
'8 g Is" 0 -5 ell ~ 0 3;g ~ 1il ]~.s ",,-0 & 50!! >'"O:;a'~ . !!
ab~ - - 8 ~I'<::~ ~ Is ~"...Is~~ _ u.aa"!5~~~
c 0 ~ 8 r.n' 0 >. ~ lS.. u 0 ~ (l;\ -E OIJ VI'C . c:: .C
~[~.~ ~ :'3 i.~.5 ~a : ] . [i5~I:;!1 .g ::,e:'gJil]~]~
~~"2l' ~ ~ ~~:'38~.5 "0 ~1oI~''<]>'':.'''' ';;;'.;E'cu.o1!.",o
;...",c "0 <;: ""!3 '" l5u", "')Z "-'; ",..."0'" '"
'" - " c ~ ~:>.- C - ~ ... '" "''' ."0 E ~ 0 '" - 2l ""
:t...... 0.0 lU ~ C lU ~ . 0 .- . C::l :9:it: 0
:s a! 0 5 ..:: . -;;; j;! .a!j ~'2 ~ ~ l'l ~ ,,'" U .9 Ii 0 -l9 u'~ "'.- 13 "~.!!"O
CEO E.9 ~ ;... ~ '- ~ 3] [ij [I:; ~ ~.a " . ~ ~ I:; ~ '" '" -8 ~ .! .5"0 g tt.~.~ 15 ~
-a~ ~.~ ~ ~ 1!. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" .B E ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ ,5 ~ ~ j a ~ :5' a ~~ ~ ~ d'5 Ii
gEt: -;;:;;... [ij E 1il ... BJ oJ "'.0... - ~ ~ -.!!.~ "" ill " C c.. '" "".9 -5 ;...- .8 2:! !'
,""",~1!.':: l'l[ij8 l'J$.~1s ~~~.9~~ ~:a~~:P'g.e~[~].~l~.:~E ..9~
l-'...fioc::S'Oc.. ~N::l ~. ]~cij 5::1 .CI";J =rJc ....,::,.VlU(l)4~L~~ti~
~l~ ~q'~ :'3~~ M - ~h~l; 1 ~~.s.~]~l~~~j3-;; ~ ~;.r~.!
~g~~i~E ~~~~~]P~~g ~~.~~I:;~'~iE8.5''O~~~~~i~~
e -5 8.15.<:: ~.E 8.E ..8..8 B'~ g.- ~ ~ ..e -f:i ..e ~ :;, :l] ~ U I:; 1!.1s g .5 ~ ~ [ij,g ~ -.; ~ 8
~l~~~.o~~~ ~~~~g~~~~~~~t~~~~ii';~~~~~~E~~j
t~~ J 1 ~ Is I a j 6 1 ~] ~~ ,,13 1
-0 ~:t5 0 ~ ~ OAJ ~ J-; E ~ ::I
~ '- c: 'Vi Vl L-o l::: 0() ~ ~ ::I Vl 8"
...-,;IBr:';;~;>-,'a.C: V'l..c:(;lo.o
I:: 5 0 '" g] if ~E ;"'~'5 '0
~..c: ~~r:'- c: .: :"B ~ 0"0 c:
s:;:; <':I <':I C'a ~..... 0 c: '- :J 1: Qj G)
~ ~:o -5 =,:5 ; 'C '5 .: ~ t;:; ~
. '-"0 "" ~ ~.- " if-;;;:> "" '"
= 2~.5 Qj ~ ~ .... '-? 0 E
O"ov ~ -5 8 > CO" " c"O '"
~o.C'l:SO OCl:tc:.D-5ooo~
er:: g J:l U : ii Is ~:;: '0 ~E-=
~u~~:E~~~t::~5;
~ov~l'l'!!i5-"'''''''''.co
e c= _-'=co ooi) o.u -5
o C":S '- <<:I III . C _ _"0 c.::;
~"5J ~~~~:.a 52 Vl'~~
8. c 0._ _ ... "'.<:: - ~ c.:<
O 0:: 0.. C'I:S e.o.!2 OJ) ~ '= u
.... V'J Q,,) V'J'C QJ Q.) >. c: d) C'I:S C'I:S
~ 0 cu bO:.a OJ "0 - (,) 'C :: o..J:J 0
'- ~ c <;j ~ [::j t: :J ~ 'u ~ eo
E .... e 0 E ~ :J .="'C II.) '€ 0 ~
_::~OV)U E_u-5C'I;1.c5
= '<::"0 ~ II ff g -.; -;;; ~.5 c.. 8 "
~ Vl ('j to E ~ 'u u.. ~ -5 ~ ~
~ E:O ~ ~ ~ R g ~.~ ~ E:o
L1Je]~~~~~~=~E~
t.:: ~ l"') :0 ';; -= ~:o ~ ;.a.E ~
8 ~ ~ ~ B g>" ~~ B ~ 8 ~8~ ~ ..c -ti~ oS ~.-5 li~ Q S;; ~ ..;: 13.; 6. N N i;',fj
~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -ti ~ ~ j 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~] i ~ ~ ~ ~ ! i g ~ ~ ~ 1
oS l ~ g l ~ E~ .: ~ ~,:,': B'~! ~ ~J~1s 8 ~'g!l!'~~ ~~~ ~ J,~~ '[ '[ .~~
as ~ ':;; ~ -= ~ e: ~ 13 ~ ~ ~ '6. E ~ ~ 8 ~ ~';; ~ l! -;; e.8] ~ c:.c g ~ g'" ~:l '" '" .5 J!
B "" .~ ~ .5 ls ~ ~ .3 '8 8 E.3 ,g ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ .8:2::;]::E o~ r€ :'3 ls 8 ~ ~ ~ ] ~
- Is 15. '2 ] ~ .9 g ov - " ov .t: -= -5 .... E.o" "" I.;: .E ~ ,g 0 " 5 c ~ ~ 13" c "" .t: ...!! 1;;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ c~~ ~~c ~ ~~~c ~ c~c~~~ _o~ ~ _~~ c ~~~~
~ Q. ~ "E ~ a li 0 ~ ~ ~.t: '0 ~ -5" 0 S ..:: .!lE, ~ 'g] " g ~ .E '0 i:i' ~ I.;: \l -5 .g t ~ -5 '5 "0 c; :3..!!
~ 1l" .c.c" - '" ~ ~ .- e!'-" 0 E U E" ov;;: c '" 0.- '- "0 "O:;! E _
zs.. l< ctI ~ -.;;;J -.::0 '"C "t:l::q <+-0 ~ :t ~.; = 't:i ~ - € c c;:: ~ .c '"C - 0 o..:a.: u lI,) Vl ~
... 1i:" ~ ~ Ella ~ 15. 8. 8:: ~ c ~): '; ~ ov E..::] ~ -;;; ~ ov ~.t: g>" ~ .~ ~ ~ -;;; :: lJ e!' ] :;: 13 -g "g
o.~ c ~ a g ~ "O.B ~ 6 ~.c 5 ~.- ~ \) --c:; ~ 8 ~ ::3 ~ ~ a ~ ... ~ € ~ ... ~'g 3 (OJ "5 ~ .~ E ~ ~ 5
'[ iil .~ 5~ '" '" -;; 11;... '[ '[ g, 1 '[ c ~ ~ ~ . ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8. . ~ ~ ~ ~ 5'~ ] E.E ~ i5 ~ ~ 8. 8.~ .2 ~
Cl B ~ . ~ E ~ ctI E <n VI Vl _ ~ ~ ~ :s ~ ~ ~ g ~.c ::3:i B ~.9 ~ ~ B e ~ B 6. E .s; e ~ ~ Vl ~ a Vl s
e c.2 -I.;: - ~ OV' g " .; ass g ov .<:: '" o.(:a Ej'E c.~ 0 ""- ~ - ~ N:; "" ~ :;;... ov i5 :. c..:: " <:: E '€ <t:
-~N" -= -= Ej...<::c= 5 5.<::= "'''''.:<c Is ""O-2:!~'<::~ N.....ov ~a"" .~; <:: t: ~u
g.g ~ i ~ .:5 :5 =€ ~ ~ ';:;'g.!! B 9 9 g H .9 ~ c; E B >.~ ~ g ~ u ~:E ~ ~ ~ ~ -5 -5 ~ 'O.~ ~ ~ . c 5 ~ .~ ~~ as E
:;c'" ."O~ ~ ~1A"O E-~- ---"0- ~,,:;ov-~-$-5-"-"''''cQ.b - .o_1;;~ ,," CCCC"Og'"
~ ~ ~ i~e co 00 ~- >.] ~~1J~-ci~~~ oo~:€"E ~~1~~~.!: ~3:a 3~]::3 8 e!l 5 ~~o...a'; ~.c r; .~ ~~ ~ a eo
.!!! E rJ en'= ov.E:; ,:,.E:; .= ~ ~ e ell .. ~.!!! ~.!!!.!!!.!!!'2.!!! ~ .8 a.!!! "".!!!:a.!!! ll.t: II 8..8 g ~ ll:l.!!! II 5 l'l ~ 11 3 '~:S -5 ~.3 ~.3 ~ -;;; .E
ce<::os....covc g ""~dcc"ccc"c13 ::Ec:.cc"c=~=....=_ -"ll ="<::~<::'<::ov~"'c""""""gls
::3~.c-~~~~] .c~5uE~'-=~==="O="t:lctl =~=~=ctIVlctlOctlNctI~~~ ctI~'C~'C~~Vl~ctI~C~coo~
"'~ - VI ~ ~~> "'iVl~VlVlVl'"CVl~~OVl_Vl~Vl.c_.c ..cN~O.c~- ..c~ CVlC ~~~N~~_'
.- O.cO"t:lOOO 000 .8.Vl.- '-C'-'-'-i-oo~'-ctI'-0._~U~~~' ~E~-~~o~=~.-8.o~~v~.vo~~
= z~z;...z_z~zc 6= =o===~=_ '~=~="'==~=o=~~=~"M=oZE<i50 z.::E8::E8~~3
'!ol . Cil . 8 . ih ." ..t: . ov!ol '!ol . c . . .!o! . c "':: . oS . i:i' . ." .." . o.t: . N ov 1;; . n . '" ..... . i1 . e . U . U' e
~ -= ~ ::E :q - ~ 'd~ :e ~ ~ ~.::: -= ~ -=;;; 6h~ ~ ~ -= ~ 6h -g,~ ~ .;;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~$f ,5 ~ ~ ov ~ C'J '0 6h~ ~ ~ 6 ~ 'E ~ ~ ~ o.~ N ~ N S;; 15 ""
~
..a
N ~ 0 ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ "' ~~ 0 gf
~~~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~- ~~N~~
Nr- c 'll r-''''OO 00 >. ._- 0.
- ..NN"~':< N 0 "0 _~~_~~""~
~8~~ov~-g..a~8~~~ ar-,,"-~~a~Cil
-Q.ll~l~:;:~"o:Q.~~~;;;l~tZe!'"O~~~~
~! g ~~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ J ~ ; ~ ~ 5; ~ ~ i j ~ :~~ ]
"oE~~.~.t:~~~i5~",,:>~o~z""~"'>-~~
zzz~~~~~~~eIlellellell??>u ~~eIl ?~
N
." 00
~ g~",~ ~
N 00 -: ..0\ _ ~ ~
~ ..".~.."... ~ ~c;.r-: ..r---M ~
~~ ~~~ ~ ~~d~~~~~
~..a ~.~ ~ ..ac-~~-~~N
~~M ::!N~. _~,,!j E;N-.~..a~""~
r-::!~ ~ ~"O~r:r-~~~oo&.~\Cf~~ oo~.8 >>(0\
-'- ooc~aiN... i~~"Os.s~~ec1A-
~.~ -~ 1l:E '" ~ ~.8....~o a~:(l5~.g ill ",!! e
~~ -g,58M5~o~o,,~""""o"O-":a~iill
~~ ~e- e~a,,~~~~~S~~3~~~~
~~ ~~o OXXX~~~~~~~~~~~~Z
~ ~ . - ~ E "0 "co::! , c.. C I C
~ ~ ~ ~e- c; e a ~ '0 -0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0
. ~.c.c .E ~ E ~ "C .C . ~ E.c E "0 ~
~ .<::-g -g "'" 1 l'l ~ 0 ~ i5 ~g:. ~8
00 ,,:"O~ =:I -5... ,......0 -= >. ~V'JQ.) t:~
5 ""co ."'O_r,I)~ =:I 0........:;3>
e ~8... e ~~ E 't: I" .ov 8 ~ -=~-= !i
H..."" "" "0- ov "" .<:: '0;... _ t: 13.213 -",
'E ~ "" is.. Q. ~oS '" . ~ ,5 ... - e ~ c as "0 II "0 g .!!!
e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.3 ~ ~.2 ] -= ~ ~,~ ~ ~ .2lj.3 ~ E g
0.. CU>>(O 0 ..s~ ~i3 - -5-- c;:t: - co::!NCO ~..::
go . "":" ~ ~ .- 513 ~ ~ ~ 'fi '" '0 ~ li E ~ ~:::: ~ ~ = il
8 ~ ~ c .-.- ~ """0 "" t: N "0 E ti13 "':' '" M 0 1A 2 -= =
'" .= .= .= c c c 13 ~ 8 'E:; ~ e E ~ .... -'1'" M 8.'" ::: ~.o 'E '3
it 5 S 3.E .E ~ 00 "0 -5 - 5:a .c u ~ ~.";: t: J: 8. ~ ~ i5.lf"i '8
~.c~.c~ ~~ ~a~~~~ ~ .s~ 'c~~co ....B~~~.cR~
" Is ~ 15.... ... . c -;;; 'S: " :. -" ~ E .::: ~ 'E 1!. ~ .<:: 0... _ '" _ ~...-
r,I) I,..;;. c..-, ~ 00 o.o:::l C :;3> 00-' ca ., cu _ .... ..... ..... ~ _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .g 'E:; -;; 6h ~ cs 6h i:l ~c II .g ~ .o'i ~ I'" 'i ~ ~ 8.~ 8.~ ~ ~
. . . CC _~~U=:l "0 c,c_ - V'JHV'JCOV'J~~_
I.;: a a ~ ~ ~.E ~ ~~ :~ ~ E "" g ~ ].E.g i ~ ... E g 5i ~ lj g -: 8. E
'O~~~ II Ill! 1l.2.":5:iS'~" ;.E:;.<::J!.9.9 ~.9 ~-=.9 .9 >-ES E~.9~
OUOO.O ~=:I"C~~~ ~o 00 -~ cu_ ~_ ___~
tiii~ ~r~~~~J~iEii~i!~'6J~ ~~i~~8i~
.<::",,,,,,,,,, ",,,,,,,,,==_8~:''';-ov.!!!!j,,,J~,,, ",-ov~ovEov8.
~~~~~~~~~~c~3~~3~~ccl,..;;.cocc c~c~cec
:a .t: .t: .t: 't: ~.t: o.t:.t:.E.E'<:: 0 - ",,-.!! " "0 :l] ~:l "-6" .0 ".... " Ii oJ
oooooeo"ooooo:@'~~~"~~-~"~~~c~1'~1~j~
zzzzz"z~zzzzzg~~~~=~~=::E...~-ti=O~E=~~ ~
~~~~~i~~~~~d~e~c~S~~'~~~H~2~gd~~~~ay
~ 0 - - 00-..... - ("f.I - - ... - _ "0 - \0.0 _ OON -!::i N ';;;I N 8 i)'
"'d ~ 8 ~ ]..!. ~ a 5 6 ~ Co .s >. : ~ if c 8 ~ '0 ~ ~.~ :>;~ J, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~.~ ~ ~ t .5
a.. ~ ~~.5 i:i'E~] :'e ~r~ .5~ 'f ~ S.~ra g ~ ~~ ~u ~'~ ~,5 :Ee~ig ~~ ~j ~~
O ... C.c '" !ol 8..t: 0 .<:: E ...0 t '0 ~ 0 ._ 5 0 c...."._.<:: ""0 "0 0.. "c .1!l" ov
~~ ,-" ",," ....,.- c - " :. 1: "0 "E '0 .- N:' c ~ '::l c" -" c '" ~ i5 " ",," 0 E "" ..
- .n ~ C"O U 0..... . ~ "0 U 0 co .c C w ('I ~ cd U "Q (I) t::'- > C - ::: cU (';l 0 _ c .a _ _ 0
I "0 1;;'= C ""0 ~ .:1-5'" -" ".>< 8 ~ -= c .... 2."~ _"0 u;l ov ~ ov._ '" .., - ... :::1.= ~ P l."^ -.; I
:- cd "C ..0 >. U j;;Q c .. 0'- ~....... 0.:: c :;; ~ c; Q. C 1-1o.o-
~ ~ II ~ is. a :ii 8.B z".5 . ov:.:i .; III ":l . -.5 wi E -5 '<::.0 " " 0 ~.8 5 E 8ll ~ g " ~ -' :::; ~.. JlO
- ";;l - ~ u - u - - ..... 0 c:.c >-. Oll- -c 00="0 0() -' - Q., ._ II< (';l ..c";;;J cu ~ _ _
~ '0 ll:.o ~ ~ -5 ;;;] l1 ~ ~ 5,~ ';'~,3!-o.~ c.5 ~ I ~ -='i ~ .515;g ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ "~ 5 '0 11' ~ g i-!
.9 ~ ~"O "'t,!! 8 -.( ,,'t E ... j - " ~ "8 :l.5 .. t: 0. C . ~ '0 $ " E ov "0 ""'s;::J c.... - ,,'" .<::.! C'
~ '6.~Is~~~~ '~~5~~!~-~~r;;E~~"8~~~~:'~;'-a.E-5-E ~'~~]~J~~:; ;:;;
"'~_""E~ ","'E.<::~~-S t: "~":lov~"CCS~"N~:' _0.",_'''",,,,, ;;:_~
'S l ~ ] l~! ~ ~ 8. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 8~ ~ ~ ~] ~ i g ~13 ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~] ~J ~ .~ .8 ~ j
~ a ~~ g~ ~ ~15 '~1~~~~1'O]~ ~~i~~ ~~1]i ~3~ ~ ~~ .~o ~j~g ~~ ~ i:i'~'Cl
'0 =]c :a '0 '; 11 ~ g 1! ~ ~ ;. ~13 0. ~ ~ ~,g 8 ... =E 15 ,,-5 ~ "" :l ,g,s -g S ~ -5 11 ls ~.B"O -5 ovE;... ~ ,,:' ~ ~ !
I:: ".E .9:.0.<::;... B li:g.5'= a.~ 0 ~ c ~ ... -= e t... ~ .5ll." is.. ov -5 '" fi ".... ~ ov ~ 'i ~ ""~ ~ . '0 tl ~
~ ell e-~~ ~.~ ~ .'313::~E'= ~~u 8 &,-= 15 ~.f; ~'i5~ i:i'~8 ~ ll~ ~ll11-E.~'" ~ ~~C2~~,~'Si
I:: I -5 ,,"0 g'" '" '" 5 ~ "0 ~ ~ ..!! .~ 'E ~ ~ ~:g coO; ~ lt~ ~ 3 -;; E ~:l E ~'fi 6h ~ ":.0 c ~ !:!'~ '" ~ 'C::: ~ lil Co
.o~ fi ~~~~~] ~~.3~ ll~ 1!..E E.3oi I'!o~,g.rll;~ g ~-5:!4 ~.~ c ~~,g ",15 ~g.5"~-::]Ci~ ~:6~ i
~ as._..15" ov" 5-;;:;,>_-;;;~.g] e-=~:; co.. ",.15 E~ ..!S.~~,!!eIl ~i;'-.5c ~ ~,,~ "" B~'S
~ ~]~]] ~i~ ~~~ ~'[~]5~i~~ 8 ~.~ ~~~ ~j~~ ~lt~ ~.~~~] ~ ~!'~ ~~..~
~ '" c..'E ;...- .<:: .-.... E " '" - ...... ~ ...- C .. i 0'<:: " :::... " "c '" .<:: <:: - 0 "'.... ~ '" ~ <:: ".!I ..
~ c ~ :'''o~ ~s'&:,<::,,~,,: ov~ ~"O~ :l.oE-;;'~ I:: '<::-5 ~-= .,;.!d~.".~" ~ii2 fr.5~'O ~:2 a ~.t:::E= ~
-~c-5~c.o-~-5,,~-5 .8 .. =~~ eIl:.cE~~5"~t:-5i1l "13"1;;Eov"O'ON 8
~ .~ 8 .~.E 6"0 l5.. i'O -5 o:.~ ~ co '5 g ~ ~ '0 ;:t: ~ -5 Eo.. 8 ~ ~.5 0 ~."= ~ .0.._ ~ ~ > ~ ".
00
"
N
N -..:t.t""1
~_;;-:N
0\ ("I") .N"'I::t
- "f"'o-- ..
-..0 "r""-
MOOf"i"O"I::t-
~: ]~r-:
1!. ~"O"
~ 8. ll'~"
:.- E c 1A
00 0i5tl3
000
"N"
<"'IN" ..
'NO
r- .M
- r-
;"'"0
'~"i:i
~'i:
" "
1i~
00
~
c<~
t""1\lS -.:i r"')"r-
oo::t_ ~)( E-:'~
~,,~-g 1!"'-
ov'5 E"'o"""1i
E E'~ " EN ,5 ,5 ~
8ll u.c 8.-5 ~ '0 E
.i:<~~~~c.58u
."
N
N
9 1 -7
Albemarle County Code
9 13-9
Sec 13-7. Disorderl conduct
It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in disorderly conduct A
per on is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with the intent to cause public incon-
ven. ence, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof> he:
(a) In any street, highway, public building, or while in or on a pub-
lic c nveyance, or public place engages in conduct having a direct tendency
to c use acts of violence by the person or persons at whom, individually, such
con uct is directed; provided, however, such conduct shall not be deemed to
incl de the utterance or display of any words or to include conduct otherwise
mad punishable under title 1802 of the Code of Virginia; or
(b) Willfully, or being intoxicated, whether willfully or not, dis-
any meeting of the governing body of any political subdivision of this
or a division or agency thereof, or of any school , literary society or
plac of religious worship, if such disruption prevents or interferes with the
ord rly conduct of such meeting or has a direct tendency to cause acts of vio-
lenc by the person or persons at whom ,individually, such disruption is di-
rect d; provided, however, such conduct shall not be deemed to include the
utte anceor display of any words or to include conduct otherwise made punish-
able under title 18,2 of the Code of Virginia.
The person in charge of any such building, place, conveyance or meet-
ing ay eject therefrom any person who violates any provision of fhis section,
with the aid, if necessary, of any persons who may be called upon for such pur-
pose.
Any person guilty of a violation of the provisions of this section shall be
pun hed by a fine of not more than one thou sand dollars. or im prisonment for
not ore than twelve months, or by both such fine and imprisonmenL (4-21-
76,)
For state law as to authority of county to adopt this
section, see Code of Va. ,~18. 2 -415.
Sec. 13-8. Drunkenness in
rofane swearin .
If any person profanely curse or swear or be drunk in public he shall,
upo conviction thereof, be fined not more than one hundred dollars. (Code
1967,913-9; 4-13-880)
For similar state law, see Code of Va. , ~18"2-388"
Sec. 13-9. Firearms--Discha in with residential districts 0
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to discharge any firearm within
the b undaries of any residential district within the county; provided, however,
140.2
Supp. #23, 4-88
S 13-9"1
Offenses ~~M iscellaneou s
S 13-9,,2
that no person discharging a firearm within such a district in defense of person
or property as otherwise permitted by law shall be deemed to have violated this
section c
(b) Any person violating this section shall be liable to a fine of not less
than twenty-five dollars nor more than one thousand dollars for each such vio-
lation .
(c) For purposes of this section, "residential district" shall mean any
district described as VR, R-1, R-2, R-4, R-6, R-10, R-15, PUD or PRD on the
official zoning map of the county. (9-19-74; 6-10-81.)
For state law as to authority of county to adopt
this section, see Code of Va., .~ 15.1-518.
Sec. 13-9.1. Same--Transporting loaded rifle or shotgun--In vehicle.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to transport, possess or carry
a loaded shotgun or loaded rifle in any vehicle on any public street, road or
highway within the county; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not
apply to duly authorized law-enforcement officers or military personnel in the
performance of their lawful duties nor to any person who reasonably believes
that a loaded rifle or shotgun is necessary for his personal safety in the course
of his employment or business.
Cb) Any person violating this section shall be liable to a fine not to 3 0
exceed one hundred dollars for each such violation.
(c) All law-enforcement officers authorized to act as such within the
county shall have the power to enforce this section, including but not limited
to all duly appointed and acting game wardens.
Cd) Loaded rifle or shotgun as used in this section is defined as a
rifle or shotgun with ammunition within the action chamber, magazine or clip
which is within or on the rifle or shotgun. (10-20 -7 6.)
For state law as to authority of county to adopt
this section, see Code of Va.', .~ 18.2-287"1,,
Sec. 13-9.2. Same--Same-~Standing or walking.
(a) It shall be unlawfulfor any person to carry or have in his posses-
sion while on any part of a public highwry within the county a loaded rifle or \. q ,...
shotgun when such person is not authorized to hunt on the private property on
both sides of the highway along which he is standing or walking.
141
Supp. #23, 4-88
S 13 10
Albemarle County Code
S 13-12
(b) Any person violating this section shall be liable to a fine not to
exce d one hundred dollars for each such violation 0
(c) All law-enforcement officers authorized to act as such within the
coun y shall have the power to enforce this section, including but not limited
to all duly appointed and acting game wardens.
(d) Loaded rifle or shotgun as used in this section is defined as a rifle
or sh tgun with amm unition within the action cham ber , magazine or clip which
is wi hin or on the rifle or shotgun
(e) The provisions of this section shall not apply to persons carrying
loade firearms in moving vehicles nor to persons acting at the time in defense
of pe sons or property. (3-11-81 )
For state law as to authority of county to adopt
this section, see Code of Va.,f 18.2-2870
Sec. 13-10. Repealed by ordinance adopted 4-13-88.
Sec. 13-11. Huntin --Prohibited with firearms near
It shall be unlawfuLfor any person to be engaged -in the huIiting' or. attempt.,-
ing to hunt with a firearm of any game bird or game animal within fifty feet of I L9
any p imary or secondary highway in the county. Any person violating the
provi ions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable as pro-
vided in section 1-6. (Code 1967, S 13-10.)
(
\
For state law authorizing county to prohibit hunting
with firearms within'one hUndred yards of high-
ways, and defining the term "hunt, "see Code of
Va., ~ 29.1-5260
Sec. 13-12. Iceboxes and other air~ti ht containers--Precautions required
when abandoned, etc. .
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to discard, abandon, leave or
allow to remain in any place any icebox, refrigerator or other container, de-
vice 0 equipment of any kind with an interior storage area of more than two
cubic f et of clear space which is 'air-tight, without.first removing the doors or
hinges from such icebox, refrigerator, container, device or equipment.
r
\\
b) This section shall not apply to any icebox, refrigerator, container,
device or equipment which is being used for the purpose for which it was ori-
ginall designed, or is being used for display purposes by any retail or whole-
saleme chant, or is crated, strapped or locked to such an extent that it is im-
possib e for a child to obtain access to any air ~tight compartment thereof.
(
'...........,,;
It,
142
Supp. #23, 4-88
9 13-16
Albemarle County Code
9 13 -2 0
Sec. 13-16. Obstructin roads and ditches.
No person shall obstruct any road or any ditch made for the purpose of
drai ing any road. (Code 1967, 9 16-2.)
For similar state law, see Code of Va, , ~ 33.1-345..
Sec. 13-17.
into' structure occu ied as dwellin
No person shall unlawfully enter upon the property of another, in the
nigh time, and secretly or furtively peep or attempt to so peep, into or through
or sp through a window, door or other aperture of any building, structure or
othe enclosure of any nature occupied or intended for occupancy as a dwelling,
whet er or not such building, structu!'e or enclosure is permanently situated
ortr nsportableand whether or not such occupancy is permanent or temporary.
Any erson violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misde-
mean r punishable as provided in section 1-6. (Code 1967, 9 13-17,)
For similar state law, see Code of Va ., ~ 18.2-130.
Sec. 13-18.
or 'near 'roads or streets.
No person shall shoot any firearm in or along any road or within one hun-
dred ards thereof, or in a street of any town , whether the town is incorporated
orno . Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a
misd meanor punishable by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars. (Code
1967, 9 13-21.)
For similar state law, seeCodeofVa.,'~ 18.2-286.
Sec. 13-19. Sunda
of state law within count .
The provisions of Code of Virginia, section 18.2-341 shall have no force
or eff ct within the county. (1-16-75.)
For state law as to authority of county toadoptthis
section, see Code of Va. , ~ 18.2-342.
Sec. 13-20. Trees, shrubs, etc,~-Unlawful destruction, injur , etc.
It shall be unlawfulfor any person to pick, pull, pull up, tear, tear up,
dig, ig up, cut, break, injure, burn or destroy, in whole or in part. any
tree, hrub, vine, plant, flower or turf found being or growing upon the land
of ano her, or upon any land reserved, set aside or maintained by the state as
a pub ic park or as a refuge or sanctuary for'wild animals, birds or fish, with-
out ha ing previously obtained the permission , in writing, of such other person
or his agent or of the superintendent or custodian of such park, refuge or
sanct ary to do so, unless the same is dOne under the personal direction of such
142.2
Supp. #23, 4-88
'1--..(j.J (" l C,lv '
5(;1< G
,_ ~.t-rr '~J.I
i~
(
(
'--.~
~ 18.2-283
1
I
:-
~
CODE OF VmGINIA
~ ] 8.2-287
~ 18.2-283. Carrying dangerous weapon to place of religious wor.
ship. - If any person carry any gun, pistol, bowie knife, dagger or other
dangerous weapon, without good and sufficient reason, to a place of worship
while a meeting for religious purposes is being held at such place he shall be
guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor. (Code 1950, ~ 18.1-241; 1960, c. 358; 1962, c.
411; 1975, cc. 14, 15.)
* 18.2-283. L Carrying weapon into courthouse. - It shall be unlawful
for any person to possess in or transport into any courthouse in this
Commonwealth any (i) gun or other weapon designed or intended to propel a
missile or projectile of any kind, (ii) frame, receiver, mumer, silencer, missile,
projectile or ammunition designed for use with a dangerous weapon and (iii)
any other dangerous weapon, including explosives, tasers, stun weapons and
those weapons specified in subsection A of ~ 18.2-308. Any such weapon shall
be subject to seizure by a law-enforcement officer. A violation of this section is
punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor, and upon the person's conviction, the
weapon seized shall be forfeited to the Commonwealth and disposed of as
provided in subsection A of ~ 18.2-308.
The provisions of this section shall not apply to any police officer, sheriff,
law-enforcement agent or official, game warden, conservator of the peace,
magistrate, court officer, or judge while in the conduct of such person's official
duties. (1988, c. 615.)
* 18.2-284. Selling or giving toy firearms. - No person shall sell, barter,
exchange, furnish, or dispose of by purchase, gift or in any other manner any
toy gun, pistol, rifle or other toy firearm, if the same shall, by means of
powder or other explosive, discharge blank or ball charges. Any person
violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a Class 4
misdemeanor. Each sale of any of the articles hereinbefore specified to any
person shall constitute a separate offense.
Nothing in this section shall be construed as preventing the sale of what are
commonly known as cap pistols. (Code 1950, ~ 18.1-347; 1960, c. 348; 1975, cc.
14, 15.)
* 18.2-285. Hunting with firearms while under influence of intoxi-
cant or narcotic drug. - It shall be unlawful for any person to hunt with
firearms in the Commonwealth of Virginia while under the influence of
alcohol, or while under the influence of any narcotic drug or any other self-
administered intoxicant or drug of whatsoever nature. Any person violating
the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor. Game
wardens, sheriffs and all other law-enforcement officers shall enforce the
provisions of this section. (Code 1950, ~ 29-140.1; 1952, c. 96; 1962, c. 469;
1975, cc. 14, 15.)
* 18.2-286. Shooting in or along road or in street. - If any person
discharge a firearm in or along any road, or within 100 yards thereof, or in a
street of any city or town, he shall, for each offense, be guilty of a Class 4
misdemeanor.
The provisions of this section shall not apply to firing ranges or shooting
matches maintained, and supervised or approved, by law-enforcement officers
and military personnel in performance of their lawful duties. (Code 1950,
* 33.1-349; 1970, c. 322; 1975, cc. 14, 15.)
J
I I
]
* 18.2-287. Counties may regulate carrying of loaded firearms on
public highways. - The governing body of any county is hereby empowered
5:36
COUNTY OF ALBEMARlJE
:J. . 'II.. .Cf-:j
v \ :.?\ (,0;-
0'3.C?;f.f3. (5. (5)
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
February 25, 1993
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
House Bill 1205
have recently learned that House Bill 1205 has passed both the
use and the Senate which will mean basically an extension in the
fe of the existing Ivy Landfill. specifically, the bill will
low us to vertically expand certain existing cells within the
ndfill and will result in an extension of the landfill's life by
maximum of 2-3 years over previous projections. It also results
providing better closure ability, it delays the opening of cell
and should be favorable both fiscally and environmentally to the
ndfill. Overall, this should provide for a projected life in the
ndfill of 15 to 18 years rather than the current projected life
12 to 15 years.
ould you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
sitate to contact me.
T,Jr/dbm
.031
..' c.1-~...Cl3
93 . (J303{,5 /& )
#
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
.
.
Richard Huff, Deputy County Executive
of Finance r
Robert J. Walters, Jr., Deputy Director
February 25, 1993
.
.
Monthly Financial Report
tached is the January Financial Report for the General and
hool Funds.
ojected General Fund revenues have been adjusted to reflect the
nuary 4, 1993 revisions. Projected General Fund expenditures
r all General Government operations have been reduced 1%.
ojected School Fund expenditures for certain accounts were
eviously reduced 15%.
e Fund Balance report indicates that the School Fund has a
ficit of $(15,858). Adjustments are in process which will
iminate the deficit.
P ease contact me if you have any questions.
C py: Melvin A. Breeden
" *'*'*'*' *'*' '#. *'*' *'*' *' *'*' '#.
~ <X)C\lC")0 OC\l C") C")I'- LOo) ..... .....C") C\I
.....~~~ o <X) <X) ~~ ~<O ~ C\lC") ~
Z 0 ..... LOO cia) C\I 0) <X) ..tcD 0 ..tai LO
1.1.I I'- ~ LO..... ~ <0 LOo) 1'-<0 LO C")~ LO
(,)
a:
1.1.I
a..
en
z ~
o a:
~ 0
< Q..
a: 1.1.I
1.1.I a:
Q.. ..J
o ~
~ (,)
Z Z
:) <
8 ~
1.1.I ~
..J :J:
a: ~
< Z
::i 0
~ ::i
..J
<
1.1.I
"
z
<
:J:
o
C")
~
~
....
,.
<<0
(i')<w
ee
NO
0>1.1.I
.-'"
~:,O
....~..
C") I'- I'- 0 LOI<O <X)
I'-.o)C\I<O I'-LOCO
C")~O~Olq~LO CO
C\lcO C") I'- I'- <0 ~
<X)C")(I)C").....O~
O"*'LO<O.....C")....
al~.,f~C\iLO ~
LO C\I ~ C\I
~ tA- ~
....
C\I~O<O
C\I.....OC")
C")~I'-~
(,)al(,)cO
<OC\I<X)I'-
01 ~ ~. q
..... .t") <0 C\I
C\ltA-tA-C")
.... tA-
(1)1<0 I
.....LO""
.""..'LOC\I . .
";cO ......
I'-Ogo
o~ C") C")
~lOOl
LO. lO.
W..'
....
-~
"".
~
11)
'If;.
-~
. .(>>
ti't',
C\I
C\I
~.
C")
C\I
C\I
"'"
....
iii
-
C
::J
0
0
0
CIS
-
C
Ql
E
c
....
Ql
>
0
"
Iii
....
Ql
C
Ql
"
Iii
.....
0
..::.:
0
CIS
.0
32
0
.c:
*'
.....
CIS
"t:l
C
CIS
(/)
-
C
::J
0 .....
0
0
CIS
C
0
;;
CIS
0
::J
"t:l
W
C
"iij
t::
Ql
0
.....
0
..::.:
0
CIS
.0
"t:l
0
.c:
*'
LO
CIS
-
0
Ql
~
Ql
....
(/)
Ql
....
::J
~
"t:l
C
Ql
c..
X
Ql
"t:l
Ql
-
0
Ql
"0'
....
Q..
iC
,...
,...
....
LO <0
,... ....
.... ,...
.... tit
....
-
,...
,...
....
<0
....
,...
....
~umur C\I~O<O ~II 0 0
.....I'-~I'-I'-LOLO ~""'OLO C")LOo) LO tit
<X)_~"'":.~~LOgo ~~":": LOLOO go
C")~ .....0) LO.....1'-<0 C\i OO)C")C") C\I<Oo) C\I
~W C\lO.....<O.....oC") C")I'-<X)O) C")OC") C")
(\i" <O~~I'-""'C")<O .....LOLOC\I OC")C") <0
.. .. ... ..
~C al tA- ..; tA- C\i LO . C\lC")<OC\I LOLOO C\I
LO C\I tA-tA-~ C\ltA-tA-C") LO <0
it~ tA- tA- tA- tA- tA- ~
tA- ....
en
1.1.I
:)
Z
W
>
1.1.I
a:
(/)
o
- z
o ::>(/)
~ U.w
u._ (!J:)
~(/) ZZ
~O Z~~
WO -<1.1.I
ZI (/)I-a:
W II:(/)
G~ ~W::>..J<
__ <u.(/)
~~WII:(/)I~
<<I-WZu.O
(,)(,)<O<~~
OOI-WII:W
~~(/)U.I-(/)
(/)
Z I-
o Z
I- W
< :::?!:
II: Z
W II:
Q.. W
o >
I- 0
Z~ (!J
W< ~
~I- <
ZZ II:
II:W W
w:::?!: ~
E;~ (!J
(!J<(/)~
~Q..II:<
<WWI-
II:OU.O
WI(/)I-
ZZzm
WO<:J
(!Jzl=(/)
en
W
(/)
Z
W
a..
X
W
z
(/) 0
Z(/)(i5
QO>
I-Z-
<::>0
1I:u....J
W(!JO
Q..ZO
O-I
O~U
Z<(/)
::>I-...J
u.(/)<
...J:JI-
0(/)0
011-
Iu.m
...J:J
UW(/)
(/)(/)
en
W
en
Z
1.1.I
a..
x
1.1.I
..J
<
~
o
~
en
1.1.I
en
Z
1.1.I
Q..
X
1.1.I
a:
1.1.I
>
o
1.1.I
:)
Z
W
>
1.1.I
a:
LL
o
W
(,)
Z
<
..J
<
a:l
0
Z
:J ~
u.. a::
...J 0
<( D..
a:: W
W a::
z
W ...J C')
c.l' ~ 0)
0 0)
~ ,...
z >
z <( a::
:J z <(
0 u.. :J
0 ~ z
W <(
...J Z ..,
a:: ~
<( Z
::E 0
W ::E
a:l
...J
<(
"'*.' .
..~....fO.<
..........
NO
(J)W
lZ6
....a:
Q..
*"*"*" *"I*" *" *"*" *"*"*"*" *"*"*"*"
~ O)....CO 00 C\I C\I.... ....~O)CO ,.......IO~
,... ~ ,... O~ ~ C!~ ~~~~ ....O~IO
Z 0 0) .t- O"': 0) O)C') ....0)0)C\1 o;a).t-(-,i
W .... ~ ~ CO 10 lOCO 10101010 IOm....co
0
a::
W
D..
W
CJ
Z
<(
Z
o
(II)""CO;ex)
....o()~,...,...
~ ~.~_. g~....~"
o .~ C\I ,... to
a; ..t (;It ,... ..t
10 (;It CO
(;It Eft
CO 0 C') C\I. 10 0 (II) C\I~;.(O
o m m.... .,... oco C\I;;" 0 (")
~~ ~: i:~."_ i.~~. :~IO: ..~: iii", ~..i.'.... ~:
C')""CO""~C\IC\1,...C')CO'lt'
(;It (;It (;It (;It (;It C') (;It (;It $ .(0
$ . Eft
C')~
O)w
CiiCJ
0)0
it~
....,...O;CO
,...C\I0,...1O
0)_ m_ ": 0) "!..
,...mm....m
C\I....COC')O
CO 0""""0
a>..,f(;lt,...ui
10$ CO
(;It (;It
....,...mIOO)oC')m~;co
CO 0),... 0.... 0""""""010
q, q, ~ C')_ 0)_ 10_ 0)_ ~ ~ .... "!..
com~molOcoC')mC')m
1O....lOmC\l,...COIO....O)O
mC\l co....,....... 10....10 100
eti"":<ti"":..tNN"":eticoui
(;It(;lt(;lt(;lt(;ltC')(;It(;lt(;lt CO
(;It (;It
W
:J
Z
W
>
W
a::
zUJ
_=>
CJ)Z
a:UJ
-JUJ>
<(u.UJ
-JUJa:CJ)a:
<(I-UJZ-J
U<(O<(<(
o I- UJ a: 01-
-JCJ)u.1-
I-
Z
o
i= UJ
<( a: I- CJ)
~Z =>z m
~O ~UJ Z
zi= I- =>~ UJ
-<( Z Ua.. a..
~a: UJ --O-J X
01- ~ Z-J<( UJ
<(~ a.. Qg;!~ G
!:-Z>-CJ)O ~UJUJ Z
>:EI-~ii1 UJO~ I-
OoUJa:> a:>-I- <(
G<(U.OUJZUI-a:CJ)a:
-J <(:> OUJ-<(a:UJ
<(-JCJ):>Oi=a:Za..UJa..
a:~UUZ<(--=>UJU.O
UJU:J:J<(U~~O~-J
Zomm~=>a:~Z<(<(
UJ::>=>=>=>O<(OOa:1-
G,a..a..ZUJa..UZI-O
I-
en
W
CJ)
Z
W
a..
X
W
en
W
en
z
W
D..
X
W
a::
W
>
o
W
:J
Z
W
>
W
a::
u..
o
W
o
Z
<(
...J
<(
a:l
"It
"It
C')
C')
....
,...
C')
...
C\I
ex)
o
C\I
"It
...
ui
-
c:
:2
0
0
0
CIS C\I
-
c:
CI)
E
c:
...
CI)
>
0
G
CIS
...
CI)
c:
CI)
G
as
-
0
.lll:
0
CIS
..c
"lJ
0
..c:
eft.
,...
CIS
-
0
CI)
;;:::
CI)
...
1Il
CI)
...
:2
;~
"lJ
c:
CI)
Q.
X
CI)
"lJ
CI)
-
0
CI)
'0'
...
a..
iC
0
Z
::J l-
LL a:
...I 0
0 D..
0 W
J: a:
0 ...I
CI) :! (')
0>
~ 0 0>
Z ....
Z < >-
::J Z a:
0 LL <
0 ~
W
...I J:
a: I-
< z
:::& 0
w :::&
m
...I
<
(')1-
o>W
C\1C!J
0>0
t~
I-
Z
W
o
a:
w
D..
*****
C\ICOC\lCOl'
~":-r:":-r:
....<OL()<O<O
v L() I L() L()
*******
I'COvvCOv....
VCOC')vC')<oCO
cxjO"':cxjt?OO
vl'L()L()C\I1'L()
....
<0
~
C\I
Ll)
....
C\I
Cfi
...
w
C!J
Z
<
J:
o
L() C') 0 01
C')CO"'~....
C\lv CO
rDai ,..:
CO.... L()
....... O'l
... ~
~g...
0>..-
C\10
o>w
>-'
LLO
a:
D..
I'<oV!V
O'lv....L()T""
o CO. C').L(). .,.(0
cDi.O"':f.() 00
C'). CO C') 0> V
v....v<OI'
"'O"'C')~
C\I C')L()
... ...
L()
0>
o
~
I'
CO
...
C') "It 0 V o~CO O:l
~C')(O'l-O~....
, 'i:t<O C') C') vL()I'
~~~gii'
........L()L() V
"It......... L()
... ...
l!J
r::
::::J C')
0
(J
(J
<<I
r::
0
:;::;
<<I
(J
::::J
"0
W
r::
'iij
~
Q)
(J
-
0
..:.::
(J
<<I
..c
~
0
..r::
*
L()
....
<<I
-
(J
Q)
;;:
Q)
....
l/)
Q)
....
::::J
,t::
"0
r::
Q)
Q.
X
Q)
'0
Q)
-
(J
Q)
'0'
....
n..
ie
CO v O'lICO
I'C\I1'L()C')
L()C\I....L()L()
ail{)C'iL()C'i
OC')O'lO'lC')
vC') L()<O 0
"'O"'C') I{)
C\I C')L()
... ...
OVL()....O~CO
Vl'VC')OVC')
'I:I:.-r:.-r:.~'I:I:.L()~
L()C\IC')....C\I1'C\1
OCOl'O'lCOO'lC')
C\!. <0. ~ '1:1:. ... <0 q
C\I....vL() L()
v......... L()
... ...
z CI)
J: 0 W
t- W~ en
<i U< Z
w(I)z2 w
J:w<!: D..
.u z 0 ><
w-<i:o W
u>t-~ (I) a:
za:z-. w
<w-z w >
0(1)<0 (I) 0
zz~- Z
wo-.t- w w
Zu
~i=Q::> D.. ::J
X Z
<<t-a: w w
(I) .t-<t-
...J za:a:(I) CJ >
0 ZW OOwz Z w
0 -::> z~g,n..O t- a:
J: (l)Z o<zou(I)< LL
U a: W CI) ~~<(I)(I)a:ffi 0
(I) ...JW>
W I <LLW W U(I)a:!:!:!!:!:!Wll. w
::J ...JWa:(I) a: (I) ::>-t-t-t-LLO 0
Z Z Z --(I) Z
<t-WZ...J a:_...J...J...JZ...J
W U<O<< W ~~a:UU<< <
> ot-wa:b D.. zO::><<a:b ...I
w ...J(I)LLt- >< -<n..LLLLt- <
a: t- W t- m
en
z
o
1-1-
<0:
0:0
wa..
a..w
00:
~w
zo
:JZ
0:5
0<
wQ)
-'0
O:z
<:J
:2u..
w
Q)
-'
<
-'
~O
-Z
a..:J
<u..
o
-'
00
Oz
I:J
ou..
en
-'
<0
O:z
w:J
~u..
~
0>
~
N
~
-
.....
~
0>
0>
.....
Cb
0>
~
CD
(Y)
.....
<0
CD
C\I
0-
.....
~
C\I
0>
I
o
(Y)
I
<0
o
W
o
z
:5
<
Q)
o
Z
:J
u..
o
W
I-
o
0:
I-
en
w
0:
z
:J
otO
.....,....
0,....
.....- oS
LO.....
<0<0
~~
--
o
o
0_
<0
~
-
8'
o
LO
o
C\I
~
-
;:::-
LO
o
LO
,....
,....
~
-
@"-8tO;::-oo
..... .....0>00
C\I0(Y)CDOO
v- 8- oS .....- .....- .....-
(Y) CD~~~
C\ILO (Y) ---
~~~
---
o
o
0>
<0
~
-
en
I-
Z
w
:2
I-
en
:J
"""')
o
<
en
en
w
-'
en
wI-
owz en
z
:5:2 5:w
<~o: <fi:
Q)ol-w Ww
a.. Ien
o:2:J:2l-w>-
~-'~:Ju..o:o
u..<owo~:J
enol-oen-'ent)
Zwa..,:Jow
ol-<en:2zen~
I-wo~>-:J:J::J
<~o<o:oz-
o:OI-O:woo~
a..:JO:~>I-Q)
oQ)WOOza:IW
a:C\Iu..a:oOw5:~
a..~ena..en~Ioo
~C;;~w~o~z>-
w>-o:a:<wwo><
a:LLI-u..>a..I-C\I0
to v
CD <0
,.... <0
LO cD
,.... C\I
"!. ~
.....
~
-
;:::-
LO
o
~-
0>
~
-
$'
LO
CD
LO-
.....
~
$'
.....
(Y)
(Y)
(Y)
.....
I
v
I
o
C\I
CD
N
LO
.....
.....
~
-
0>
~
en
I-
Z
w
:2
I-
en
:J
"""')
o
<
-'
~
o
I-
w
o
z
:5
<
Q)
o
Z
:J
u..
o
W
I-
o
0:
I-
en
w
0:
z
:J
o
W
I-
en
:J
"""')
o
<
,') .;:)/ q- -) .
-." '-.. C>(_..-~, - , _~)_~
. ,'.",::,
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMAR Y
SUBJECT
Informa
Hodge,
develo
propose
29 Bypass an
AGENDA
Subdivi
March 3, 1993
.
13. (]}() 3. (6./7
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
potential
29 Bypass
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:~
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes (2)
STAFF C
Messrs.
St.John
REVIEWED BY:
Brandenburger, Cilimberg,
The attached letter from Mr. Jack Hodge, VDOT, dated February 16, 1993
VDOT's concern about the proposed subdivision of three parcels that would be
ely impacted by the present alignment of the Route 29 Bypass and requests the
y work toward preservation of the corridor. Three plans for subdivision of
ent parcels have been received by staff and have been through the initial stage
e site review process. The potential impact of the Bypass alignment was noted by
and VDOT and comments provided to the applicant. The applicant has not yet
nded to the site review comments and thus this item has not been before the
ing Commission. The concerns expressed by Mr. Hodge were initially raised in site
wand prompted an opinion by the County Attorney which is attached.
ATION: None, provided as background to Mr. Hodge's letter. Recommend no
acti n be considered until such time as the application has been before the Planning
Comm'ssion. We will communicate this to Mr. Hodge.
93.0 8
Edward H. Bai . Jr
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scotlsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
March 3, 1993
M . Jack S. Hodge
C ief Engineer
D partment of Transportation
C mmonwealth of Virginia
1 01 East Broad Street
R'chmond, VA 23219
D ar Mr. Hodge:
I response to your letter of February 16th regarding proposed subdivisions
w'thin the alignment of the Route 29 Bypass the Board appreciates your
c ncern. You expressed a hope that the County would work toward preservation
o the corridor and the development of compatible land use plans for this area
a we 11.
T e subdivision plans for Woodburn Ridge, Rivanna Ridge, and Rivanna Ridge
N rth are proceeding through the County's regular review process. The impact
o the proposed alignment of the Bypass has been discussed. These
a plications have not completed the review process and thus has not been
c nsidered by the Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors.
ile the Board is sensitive to the impact of development within the proposed
ignment, the County Attorney has determined that these particular
plications are a by-right use of the property and thus we have no legal
sis to impose a reservation on the developer. I have provided a copy of the
unty Attorney's opinion for your information.
ce these applications are considered by the Planning Commission and Board of
pervisors I will advise you of any actions taken.
~erely,
td#~
Chairman
D Bjdbm
9 .012
c Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219
February 16, 1993
'JACK HODGE
CHIEF ENGINEER
r. David P. Bowerman, Chairman
oard of Supervisors, Albemarle County
01 McIntire Road
harlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
ear Mr. Bowerman:
The Department has recently reviewed three preliminary site
lans for proposed subdivisions that would be severely impacted or
endered not feasible to develop with the present alignment of the
oute 29 Alternate 10 Corridor. The three plans reviewed were
oodburn Ridge, Rivanna Ridge, and Rivanna Ridge North.
The Department has been working with the County to revise and
djust the Corridor alignment to provide the most feasible and
cceptable alignment throughout the entire corridor.
e would hope the County would work toward preservation of the
orridor and the development of compatible land use plans for this
rea as well.
It would be ironic indeed, if VDOT, at the County's request,
pends millions of taxpayer dollars buying hardship property, and
n the other hand, additional residential development occurs
ithin the same corridor.
I look forward to hearing from you and working with the Board
s we continue with this project.
Sincerely,
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
1 ("'1''''\-.'-
C\ t"~. J
GEORGE R. ST. OHN
COUNTY ATTOR Y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney
416 Park Street
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901
Telephone 296-7138
January 28, 1993
\. -.~ i: ~.-,~ ~ r ~ ;:'~~~ \:. ,t1 ~ou; ~,~j ~,~
JAMES M. BOWLING. IV
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
Mr. obert W. Hofrichter
Transportation Engineer
Corom nwealth of Virginia
Depa tment of Transportation
P. O. Box 671
Culp per, Virginia 22701
Mr. Hofrichter:
M . Tarbell in our Planning Office has asked that I respond
to hat portion of your letter to him dated January 25, 1993,
whic requests reservation of right-of-way for the Route 29
Bypa s, also known as Alternative 10, on the subdivision plats
for ivanna Ridge, Rivanna Ridge North, and Woodburn Ridge.
is my opinion that such a reservation cannot be legally
ed on the developer.
reasoning is this:
ile rezonings, special use permits, and other legislative
can be denied, or approved subject to the condition that
such a reservation be consented to by the developer, these
subdivision plats are by-right under the existing zoning and
subdivision laws. They are therefore entitled to approval as a
matt r of law, if they meet all the requirements of our
ordi ances.
R servations within by-right subdivisions and site plans, can
poss'bly be defended against judicial attack if the project for
whic the reservation is made, has been surveyed and the precise
righ -of-way located, and if the project is funded and a
comm'tment (such as the SiX-Year Plan or Capital Improvement
prog am) calls for the project to be begun, and thus eminent
doma'n proceedings be brought, to pay for the land, within a
reas nable time. In a case involving reservation of a federally
fund d bypass, with which you may be familiar, the Chesterfield
Coun y Circuit Court declared a reservation such as the kind you
Mr. Robert W. Hofrichter
requpst,
critl:>ria.
not been
plan such
Page 2
January 28, 1993
to be unlawful because it did not meet the above
The centerline had not been located, the project had
funded, and it was not included in any duly adopted
as the Six-Year Plan or Capital Improvement Program.
GRSt~/tlh
cc: Richard Tarbell
v. Wayne Cilimberg
Robert Brandenburger
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Amelia G. McCulley
IF the Attorney General's office can provide some authority
in opposition to my opinion, I would be happy to receive it.
Sincerely yours,
/~A4. ~/L---
George R. st. John
County Attorney
II
,,;'1;':'\~~';i'~;:::~
If ':h~,',.~ ~~)-
il</ 'in,', \~..
~,.~ . ~'~.li r'
I ,I _''''1-''
" ~=-) r"I/ :-", A.f..l
.:., "'I'" '.... ".
~('~,\1> >-;;"" , ,
'{J,~J',. _. _,"/ '" ""
'{r-o: r:':""'1k 11.'''' ~~y
,<~"
fI ',' .,,: ~ ._'~ ",I:.J.{:j
~-'~r~:J,. .
I:
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
\.' \\ '(.. 6 \";~):.l
...i ~,\; >
RAY D. PETHT L
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
p, 0, BOX 671
CULPEPER. 22701
25 January 1993
~:', <;:. .,):, ,
.. __ ....... 't ,.'-~. ('~ \1....~11.,., t "
~~:\~ \ 2~j \ ~ \ '~\ !\ :,..:;
THOMAS F. FARLEY
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR
site Review Meeting
28 January 1993
Rich rd Tarbell
Coun y Office Building
401 cIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Tarbell:
I have reviewed the submitted preliminary subdivision plats
for Rivanna Ridge, Rivanna Ridge North, and Woodburn Ridge.
Ri va na Ridge and Woodburn Ridge both sit in the path of the
approved proposed Route 29 Bypass (also known as Alternative 10).
Attached is a copy of each plat showing the approximate path of the
Bypass. More precise plans showing the location of this highway on
the currently proposed subdivisions will be forthcoming. Please
request reservation of Right of Way by the developer, if allowed by
your ordinances. In addition, I recommend access to Rivanna Ridge
Nor h be through Woodburn Ridge instead of Rivanna Ridge. If these
sub ivisions were reconfigured, the impact of the Bypass could be
sig ificantly reduced.
Rio Road (Route 631) is scheduled for improvement in this area
he Six-year plan. The specific effect of this project on
nna Ridge are unknown at this time.
If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at the
rict Office, (703) 829-7555.
cc: A. G. Tucker
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 5T CENTURY
. ''''~-:'l
-::)
COMMITTEES:
VIRGINIA
~~- 1";: ,') ..
ARMED SERVICES
1<::" \':; /-"';'>7 COMMERCE, SCIENCE,
JJ, '. , ' "'. AND TRANSPORTATION
-;F
,:) ,
WASHINGTON OFFICE:
ell 58nete Office Building
tltutlon Avenue, N.E. Room <493
Wllhlngton, DC 20510
(202) 224-4024
~Cni{ea ,.$!a{ez ,.$ena!e
FOREIGN RELATIONS
JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20510
February 18, 1993
s. Ella W. Carey
ounty of Albemarle
oard of Supervisors
01 McIntire Road
harlottesville, Virginia 22902-4579
MS. Carey:
Thank you for contacting me regarding financial assurance
equirements for municipalities under the Resource Conservation
nd Recovery Act (RCRA). I appreciate hearing your comments on
his regulation.
Reauthorization of RCRA was not considered before the 102d
ongress adjourned, but I expect the recently convened 103d
ongress to consider it sometime in 1993. While I was not a
ember of the Senate when the original act passed, I will
ertainly use the reauthorization process to examine carefully
egulations such as the one you describe. As consideration of
he bill approaches, I expect to work closely with Virginia's
ounties and municipalities to ensure that these regulations do
ot place an unreasonable or unnecessary burden upon local
overnments.
Thank you again for sharing your views on this legislation.
I look forward to working with you and other localities
hroughout the Commonwealth on this reauthorization.
Sincerely,
~G~
Charles S. Robb
SR\tmh
State Office
Regional Offices:
Old City Hili
1001 ElSt Braid Stree
Richmond. VA 23219
(804) 771-2221
DominIOn Towers, Suite 107
999 Wlterslde Drive
Norfolk, VA 23510
(804) ....1-3124
1 Court Squire
Suite 340
HlrrlSonburg. VA 22801
(703) 432-1551
8229 Boone Boulevlrd
Suite 888
Vlennl. VA 22182
(703) 356-2006
DominIOn Blnk Building
Mlln Street
Cllntwood. VA 24288
(703) 92t1-4104
Signet Blnk Building
530 Mlln Street
Dlnvllle, VA 24641
(804) 791-0330
Creatlr Blnte Building
310 First Street SW Suite 102
Rolnoke. VA 24011
(703) 986-0103
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
; 'J"k'" I .... .r... '~)( 0.:;;
..JJI_l r) - )CXC(C:A 0-. '0' _:,' i.'
'I?; L),/;u.r3, (,5, /1)
MEMORANDUM
ill _2-_ ~ @
OF SUPERVISORS
1]
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Bob Tucker, County Executive
Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering
26 February 1993
Waynesboro Solid Waste Baling operation
tached is a copy of the October 1992 article from Virginia
view. Based upon our recent visit to Waynesboro's facility,
e following comments are provided:
- Our guide, Mr. Jack Moore, gave a facility cost of over $1.4
million. The article states a total of $1.1 million. When I
questioned Jack specifically regarding the cost difference, he
said his number was correct.
- The Waynesboro baling facility cost was based upon this
facility being constructed with public sewer on-site. All
wash-down water for the baler and leachate must be treated.
Due to regulatory permit requirements if such a facility were
constructed without public sewer access, the cost of a holding
tank with pump and haul services provided on a regular basis
would add to the initial cost and operation cost substantially.
- The population of Waynesboro is given as 18,600. This is less
than 1/5 of the combined population of Albemarle County and the
City of Charlottesville. The baler at the Waynesboro facility
is not the very largest but is a larger capacity than
was actually required. Therefore, it would take five such
balers to bale the solid waste prior to landfilling at
Ivy. Of course, several balers could be located inside a
single building. In any case, dual balers at anyone location
would be important to cover for down time on anyone baler.
As Jack stated, they have only had one serious down time
experience and the building was filled after a 12 hour
incident. For a small operation the size of Waynesboro's,
this did not pose a serious problem.
MORE: Waynesboro Solid Waste Baling Operation
2 February 1993
P ge Two
- In terms of operating personnel, the Waynesboro landfill, with
baler, takes approximately one-half of Ivy's on-site
personnel. This sounded good at the time. Since the activity
is serving approximately one-fifth the landfill activity, Ivy's
operation compares favorably.
The significant factor to consider is:
The purpose of establishing a baling operation is to increase
landfill densities. In other words, the domestic volume
would be decreased by a greater rate of compaction, thereby
extending the life of the landfill. If the volume of domestic
material is decreased by (using conservative numbers) 20%, the
useful life of Ivy would be lengthened by a proportional amount
of time. Is the value of that additional term worth the cost
of a baling facility to serve Ivy?
Normal Landfill compaction produces densities from as low as
700 pounds per cubic yard to as high as 1,600 pounds per cubic
yard. Factors that effect compaction densities include layer
thickness, slope of the trash face, characteristics of the
waste, number of passes by the equipment, and the type of
equipment used.
According to Ivy staff, the densities at Ivy are in the range
of 1,050 to 1,100 pounds per cubic yard. To increase the
density, operators could make more passes with equipment or
place trash with a more level face. The operational (time and
equipment cost) cost would increase and/or more cover dirt
would have to be used.
According to the attached article, Waynesboro's densities went
from 800 pounds to 1593 pounds per cubic yard. During our
visit, Jack indicated each bale (2 cubic yards) averages 2,500
pounds. This is 1,250 pounds per cubic yard. According to the
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority staff, this is only about 15-19%
above what is currently accomplished at Ivy. A rough estimate
based on needing 5 balers in 3 facilities at an average cost of
$1.4 million per facility that results in a 20% volume
reduction indicates a capital cost of $4.2 million would extend
the life of the landfill 2.4 to 3 years. This does not include
operational costs and it does not consider the impact on tip
fee increases. Is $4.2 million worth 2.4-3.0 years?
J /
A tachment
~'W
~~~l4k~
2:,;j:~~~
:?fh,~
'lIlt' ahilil.y lo Sqlll'(';'.1'
n1l I'(! lhan lwo times
th waste inl.o each
ac e of landfill is criti-
cal to communities like
Wayne!lboro which am stmggling to
meet the financial burdens imposed
by EPA's SubtitJ D regulations.
Few disposal alternatives can
offer the saving and the flexihility
of baling. Balin has made waste
disposal an affi roahle sm'vice for
Wayneshoro, an I it has become a
golden pnrachut that delivered the
city safely f,'om the dangel. of sky
rocketing landfill costs,
Waynesboro i. an industrialized
city of 18,600 10 ated in the historic
Shenandoah Val ey, Like most local
government.s it i' aLLempting to pre-
pare to comply ith SubtiLle D I'egu-
lations and the e pense of these nmv
reb'lJlations. Sixt five percent of the
city waste stream is gcnCl'ated by
indust..y and hu. iness. 1"01' industry
and husiness to L1l1"iv(', solid waHte
disposal must he efficient aH well as
cost efieclive. In the lale 1 HHOs, city
officials became oncel'nod about the
mpid dllpl(!Lion of land/ill space.
The city was mpidly exhaus!.ing
its sanital)' land ill capacity and an
imminent needl site a new land/ill
was clear. Discu siom; regar'ding a
regional land/ill lo serve Staunton,
Augusta COllnt) lInd Waynl'shot'n
did not oITe,' II ti nely solution. City
officials found it n('(:essary lo will;-
draw from lIw r gional disellHsions
to pUl'Sl1(! the r own Holution.
Wayneshm'o hm to overcome the
high costs of w Iste disposal and
limited amounts fland available fOl'
a new landfill sit
THE nALING
TERNATIVE
After researc ling altel'natives,
the city selected solid waste baling
as the hest long r. nge dispmml alter-
nal.ivl', Solid wasIl' halin:: provl'd (0
Ill' LlII' arrol'(lahli' ('Iwi('(! I.h:il. opl.i-
mized the city's yield on its disposal
investment.. Today wilh its haling
ope!ration, the city is ahle to affordah-
Iy dispOSe! its solid waste at its own
ualelill. In addition, the baling facil-
ity can douhle as a convenient trans-
fel' station and materials recovery
faciliLy (MIll") for wmite and recy.
clahles. On specified days industry is
invited lo brin~ L1wi r own recyclahles
to thc city's haler for hnling. The
ba led recyclnhles arc easier lo store
and trnnsport. The hulk r~r.yclahles
are mort! atlractive to vl!IHlors who
purchase the mater'ials. This ahility
to transpOl't haled recyclahles nnd
wasles to distant ,.ccycling markets
and land/ills is a financial windfall
for the city.
.Jel'ry Gwaltney, Wnyneshorn City
Managcr, lwei this ohsCl"Vation ahout
the city's decision aholltl.his alterna-
li\'(~. "llalin~:om'rl'c1 Llw city I.Iw most
(i,vorah)(! lin:uwial lll!neliL. J';qually
imporl.anl., haling' off(ll'ed L1w po-
tential 1.0 douhle the life of our
remaininl~ landfill wit.hout addition-
al invesl.ment. No other option con-
tained the flm.:ihility to Iwep disposal
expens(!s down, extend lanel/ill life,
wh ile (m hancin~ ou r rl'cycJ i nl~ ('1lC)rts,"
In March l!)!)l, the Waynesboro
Solid Waste rlaling Facilily was com-
plded, TIll' 10,000 square foot facili-
ty ('osl. $I,100,O()O and is capahle of
IH'oe('ssin,: 100 tons pl'l' clay, Aceord-
ing 1.0 City Manal:l'/' CwalLlH'Y,
"Since Llll' sl.al.t of halinl~, dl'part-
mental mor:d(' and produetivity
have increased and the public has
developed a much higher' regard fOl'
the city sanitntion department."
FLEXInLE TO
INDIVIDUAL NEEDS
Baling can be easily incorporated
into an existing landfill or into a
landfill t.hal. is in the lIe1vancl'd
dl!sign stagl', Tlw haldill meds the
sanw rel~ulations as a conventional
land/ill. This docs not complicate the
re/,'1.datory review process.
Dur'ing the city's operation of n
conventional landfill compaction of
waste was determined to be 29.62
pounds per cubic fooL. With bnling
the waste! compaction rate was in-
c,'eased lo 59 pounds per cubic foot.
This numhCl' rep,.esenls a two fold
increase in the waste compaction for
haled waste ove,' the unbaled wnste.
Over the life of the lanclli\l, the city
will avoid millions of dollars in land-
fill cOlits, Even with the added ex-
pense or the haling facility, the per
ton cost 01' waste disposal for the cily
\Vas Jesli than conventional landfill-
ing.
InCl'eased compaction of baled
waslc has ,'('sulted in a more efiicient
use of land/ill space, and extends
landfill life, Waste i~ compacted
The author i.e; vir(~ prl'.o;ident o(
Mallem & Crn;~ COII,e;ultillg Bllgi-
lIe(~rs ill Roal/o/w, VA. Iff. Iw.e; served
;11 local governmellt as city mallager
o( Covillgtoll and Vinton Town
Ma,wg(~r.
VIlU:IN'" 111-:\,1/,:11' \I'""", 01; U".'"''r/''' MntUll!"II"'''' S""/,'",/",r/Or',,/,,,r 'I):! :11
before entering the landfill. This re-
duced the need for expensive earth
movi g and lnndfill compncting
equip ent, ,
Th time needed for covering the
bnlefill is also drasticnlly reduced.
Dnlin hns incrensed the volume
rntio 024 parts ofwnste to one part
of cov r, When the city operated the
conve tional land/Ill, a waste to
cover volume l.nLio of only lhl'eo
IfrirLs wnsU! lo one parl c()~er w;;
nchwved. ..
........'l'hc Irtcility is also II good nei~h-
bor, This kind of wllste reduces the
numher of hirds, vector, odor, litlt~r
nnd dust nt Lhe disposnl sileo In
nddiLion, trucks no lon~el' cnLel' Lhe
Inndfi\l; so tracl<in~ of mild onto
puhlic streets, nnd plumes of dust
WAYNESnORO. VIRGINIA
DISPOSAl. 560,000 TONS OF WASTF.
CONVENTIONAl.
LANDFILL
SANITAnv
nALm~ILI.
R Acre nnll'fill
20 Acre Lnndfill
70 Tons Per Dny
$350,000 Per Acre
70 'rOn!! Per n.iy
$350,000 Pl'r Acre
A.
n, ns.Dny Waste Strenm
C. ost Per Acre
ouble Ii ners
ethane Systems
achate System
nter Monitoring
neludes Closure
o Yr. Post Closure Cnre
D. ost at Closure (AxC)
E. nling Fncility Costs
F.
G. ns Disposed At Closure
II. npitnl Cost Per Thn (F/Gl
T, rojected Lnndlill Life
(Virginin Rl'gulntions)
(Virginin 1l1'1l'ulnlion!!l
$7.000,000 $2,ROO,OOO
$0 $1,275,000
$7,000,000 $01,075,000
51l0,OOO Thos 560,000 'I\IOS
$12.50 Per Thn $7.2H Per Tun
25 Yenrs 25 Yenrs
J, epent Siting New Lnndlill YES NO - 12 of lhl' 20 Acn's lll!mnin,
:17 Yenrs of nispo!!nl HI'mnin
The C inri .qlwIIIS hOlll Waynes/lOro:q I'iglll arrl' Im/l'fillr/l;ll dis!,o,ql' Ilu' snllll' 1'11//111/1' /If
//Ia.qle as n 20 acre cOllr'l'Tl/imJaI Inrrd{ill. not" d;,q/JO,qnl /(II';I;t;I',q (In' l'nJlfI[,/I' IIf
dispo, illg !iliO,OOO tOilS of lIIr",ir;pal solitl /I'mltl'.
L t Us Put The Solution
o Many Solid Waste
roblems In The Palm
Of Your Hand.
'\ ~ want 10 introduce YOIlIIl a I iml'-prllVl'n ,
I.' \'irimmentally ;ICl'I'Pll'd slllid wasll'll'l'hnllln~y
II :II h:ls:
. MI.'l m'w waSIl.' llispl\sal rl'~lll:11illns al a fraclinn
Ill' lhe cllslllf a clm\'enlillnall:mdlill.
. Dlluhk-lllhe lil~ nf al:lndfill.
. Enh:tnCl'd rl'SllurCl' reCllVl'r\', :lnd can saw \'lllllil111'.
monl'y:tnd m:tnhllurs in YIli.lr daily WaSIl",
disposaloperalion.
WI.' want to loan you an infllrmaliw \'id~1l
ssette on this time-proven, envirllnmenlllllv S:1fl"
a d cost-eOicil'nt pn~lCl'SS' .
o cost or ohlig:llion,
Just c:l1I: Mattern & Crai
---- ... - - . g
. COt<<l.utl.....lttoli....."'. ,......"...,
701 Fir~1 Sir.....,. SW, Rnannk.., VA :!,IO'''. (711,1) JI~_')JI:!
'"
-)') tv,....,.. .r. fl,.",.."r,." A-I""'''''''II/."I ,':,.nll.,u/ll'rln,.fll!,,'r '9~~ V1UfilN1A nl':Vl1'~"\,
nrt~ elirninnleel. The halin~ facility IS
nn attmclive h\lilelin~ localed adjn.
cent to an estahlished ne~i~hhorhood,
The stability of baled waste en.
hanceR ~t'ndin~ to comply with the
linnl ('ontollr~ of lhe lnndfill plnn.
This ifl impod.nnt nl Wnynm,horo ns
the lnncllill is located em a pl'Orninent
knoll easily vie'wl'e1 thro\l~hnlll the
city, 1'he~ wt\st.c! ('on hI' ,,1.nI.leNI t.A.
hei~htH oxc(ledin ' 12 feet A Rix i c
aye.' 1\ cllver IS added da i y to th '
('xposee . _ s lll>'o.J'IH \Iced
UIVI'I' 1'I!quil'emenl,iH inl!11n:tnnt
when covel' mntel.inls nre scnrce. The
wnsto to COVI'I' I'nlio cnn he increnRcd
even moro if" n synthetic cover mnte.
rinl is ut.ilizccl.
nALlNG LEAVES
Tnday city nfficials m'c discovcl"ing
new nnd innovnlive contrihutions
thnt this PI'IlCI'SH oITers, They hnve
l'nnd\lell'd SlH'l'eHSrul (!lcperinwnlR
wilh haling leaves, Tn evoryone's
slIl.prise IC:lvCS cnn hi! haled. The city
l'1l1l1'I'ls Icnvl's in R' x H' x 10' (640
l'uhic f!'l.t) tll~ 1I11ln~ lenf collection
lmilel's. Up until the rnll of 1991
lenvcs hllll hCI~n c'oll(!dcd nnd com-
pllfltl!el. One! and n hnlf"lrnilers (:lfi,fi
clIhic YIII.tlS) Ilf"l(!llVeS can he reduced
1.11 one hale.. Thl' hnlnd lenves wei~h
npprnximntcly 2,000 pounds.
Onl'o haled, the leaveR nre enRY to
t.mnsporl.. Due to the wenler den-
sity, they nt'e more nlLmctive as
eornmercinl muleh. A pl"Ilfcssionnl
lanelHeapI' sl'l'vil'I' huys the haled
11'11 VI'S al. a rall' nl"$l.OO per hale. The
('it.y ~:I'I.H riel Ill" tlH' jc'IIVl'fl thnt for'-
111"I'l~.. rllhhl'd v:tlllahll' s\nra~:I! spnc'(~.
Ilnl,.tI 1"aVl'H a 1'1' I'xe('lIl'nt. 1"01' lIse
aH I'l'llsilln I'lInt.rlll h:lI..-iers aL new
1'llnHl.nll't.illn sit.I's. Thl' halt.d It!llVeS
nt'I' I11Il1'C' sl.ahle' t.hnn RynthcLic m.o-
sinn harril'!"s. TIll' hall'd Il'aves trap
sllils,l:rit., nnd \\'at.c~r. The wI!i,~ht aoel
Hhapl' Ill"h:t1l'd !l'avI!s make' I'xcllllent
harril'I's Iln St.I'I'P slnp(~s. Unlike syn.
L1ll'ti(' hal"ril'I'H. h:t1I!e1 IpIIVI'S :\1'('
sl.:lhll' nil s\I'I'p slllpl's and l.nsily
wit.hHland till' vI'\Ill'itie's Ill' slll'fllce
wal/'1". TI\C' hall'r! le'll\'I's tlissipall' the
I'nl'I"J:.\' Ill" SlIl'ral'I' \\'al.('1" Ihll'in~
lll'n\'y Stlll"lllS, This ahility il> l'rilicnl
1"11I' p~.ntpelinn 01" down ~r;'Hle proper.
ty.
nnll'd lenveH mny nlso he used as
eml'rgenc'y harriers to contnin haze
n/"llllll~ Hpills. TIll! haled lenve!l nre
I'HHY 1.1\ tnlllspOl'l, nre ri~id. llnd they
ahslll'h liqllids. Tlwse chnracleri!llics
HI'P lIsl'rlll in conlrllllin~ chemicnl
Hnd hnznrclolls waste spills, Once nn
- ,
emer~enc response team has pro-
tected the pproach to a stream with
haled lea s, the wires holdinJ: the
hales ma he cut unci the leavm;
spread ov'r the spill. The ubsorb-
ency of (t.y leaves hlot up the
dangerous liquids. This benelit can
speed a h zardous waste cleanup.
The baled leaves cost a fraction of
hazardous spill harrier and absorp-
tion mate in Is and leaves are abun-
dant.
BE FITS OF BALING
The ayneshoro experience
proves th benefits of balinJ: for
woste dis osal, saving land that
would he asted as landlill space
and reduci ~ the costs of Subtitle D
Regulations. In addition baling
oITers uti ity in at'eas related to
recycling, onstruclion, landscapin~,
agricultUJ e, and emergency pre-
paredness. 1m
For ore information:
Gorge Nester
M ttern & Craig
70 First St., SW
Roa olcc, VA 24016
( 03) 345-9342
Vir!) nla Olllcc:
P.O. nox 71~)
nir." nond. VA :':1:'O(i 071!i
(1104) ().1~J.?41l;'
For ollcclion Call:
1111.11 lIonll ;':1 0:11:
Norhlh. Ii:); 1/,'h
P'~l1i ,sultl It;",. "'~,.I!,
Interested in Recycling Programs?
'l'he following is a list of organi-
zations which provide information
on setting up recycling programs.
Virginia Recycling
Association
P.O. Box 275
Herndon, VA 22070
(703) 435-3619
FAX (703) 435-3221
The Solid Waste Association
of North America
P.O. Box 7219
Silver Spring, MD
20910.7219
(301) 585-2898
Municipal Waste
Management Association
1620 gye St., N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 29:1.7330
National Recycling Coalition
1101 :lOth St., N.W., Suite 305
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 625-6406
CHAMBERS
Aluminum Association
Recycling Department
900 19th St., N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 862-5163
Council for Solid
Waste Solutions
(ROO) 2-HELP-90
The Glass Paclcnging Institute
lROl K St., N.W., Suite 1105-L
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 887-4850
American Paper Institute
Puper Recycling Committee
260 Madison Ave.
New York, NY 10016
(212) 340-0660
Sleel Can Recycling Institute
G80 Anderson Dr.
Pittsburgh, PA 15220
(ROO) R76-SCRI
Waste Systems of Virginia, Inc.
VIrginIa. GeorgIa. North Carolina. South Carolina. Indiana. Texas
A subsidiary of Chambers Development Company, Inc.
"lunlNIA UI':\'Tg\\' \\ns/,'.I: Tr,.,,,,"r('f' Muu{f!:,'m,'u/ S"/I/,'m/lI'r/Or/fl/"'r '!J:! .'/.'/
Edward H. Bqin, Jr.
Samuel MiIl~r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scollsville
David P. Bow"rman
Charlottesvi~le
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. J41umphris
Jack Jouett:
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
March 8, 1993
Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
Department of Transportation
PcP Box 2013
C~arlottesville, VA 22902
D~ar Mr. Roosevelt:
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on March 3, 1993, the
f~llowing actions were taken:
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matter: Discussion: Revised
1~92-98 Six Year Secondary Road Construction Program. ACCEPTED the
attached 1992-98 Six Year Secondary Road Construction Program, as
revised 10-92.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Discussion: Langford Farms Subdivision.
~PROPRIATED $22,000 to bring Montgomery Lane and Pippin Lane in
Langford Farms Subdivision into the State Secondary System.
, The Board asked staff to see if there is any flexibility in
vDoT's policy that requires occupancy of three houses before a road
can be taken into the Secondary System, as the policy relates to
r~sidential development and holding bonds.
Sincerely,
fj; eL6-- 1-0
Ella W. Carey,
f'
i ~ ~
. [{./U(;
Clerk, MC
EWC:mms
*
Printed on recycled paper
~.
/
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SIX YEAR PLAN
REVISED 10-92
PREVo REV .
PR ORITY ROUTE PROJECT AD DATE AD DATE
( 0 631 0631-002-128,C503 (DEFICIT)
( 1 CO. WIDE BUDGET ITEM 7-92
(2 625 HATTON FERRY 7-92
(3 664 0664-002 PLANT MIX 7-92
( 3 684 0684-002 PLANT MIX 7-93
(3 692 0692-002 PLANT MIX 7-93
( 3 729 0729-002 PLANT MIX 7-92
(3 738 0738-002 PLANT MIX 7-93
(3 788 0788-002 PLANT MIX 7-93
(3 800 0800-002 PLANT MIX 7-92
(3 810 0810-002 PLANT MIX 7-92
( 3 CO. WIDE PLANT MIX 7-94
(4 708 0708-002-241,C501 1-94
(5 654 0654-002-242,C501 6-92
(6 631 0631-002-128,C502 ' 1-99 -1-97
( 6 631 0631-002-128,B612 1-99 1-97
( 7 671 0671-002-191,B646 11-92
( 8 631 0631-002-224,e502 7-92
(9 678 0678-002-223,e501 2-94
( 11 ) --- 743 0743-002-153,e502 6-94 7-94
( 1 ) 631 0631-002-185,C501 7-95 7-96
( 1 ) 691 0691-002-234,e501 2-94
( 1 ) 866 0866-002-236,C501 7-96 7-97
( 1 ' ) 631 0631-002- ,e 1-2010
( 11 ) 656 0656-002- ,e 10-97
( 1 ) 601 0601-002-237,e501 10-97 7-99
( 1 . ) 649 0649-002-158,e501 7-99 10-99
( 1 ) 691 0691-002- ,e 7-2000
( 1 ( ) 651 0651-002- ,B 7-2000 7-2001
( 2 ) 6')'"7 0627-002- ,e 10-93
,,-I
( 2 ) 682 0682-002-P33,N501 7-92 1-95
( 2 ) 610 0610-002-p ,N 7-94 7-96
( 2 ) 712 0712-002-P ,N 1-96 7-96
( 2. ) 711 0711-002-P ,N 7-96 7-97
( 2t ) 760 0760-002-P ,N --~---~-- - - --- 7-96 7-97
( 21 ) 637 0637-002-P ,N 7-97 7-99
( 2' ) 759 0759-002-P ,N 7-97 -- DELETED
D TNOfC:/7T~5 CIII);l/{;c.o /lilV J//JTES
..
,
'J" cX.:ak.=:t3
t?[)~20 Z~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-45%
(804) 296-5823
M MORAN DUM
T
F
v'Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community UuJ~
Development
February 25, 1993
1992-98 Secondary Six Year Construction Program
Revisions
e attached has been submitted by VDOT as regards the above
ferenced. Staff has met with VDOT staff regarding reasons for
e changes. It should be noted that VDOT has now indicated the
ute 743 (Hydraulic Road) project will not be advertised until
nuary, 1995 and the Route 682 project will not be advertised
til August, 1995. Information is also attached indicating the
fect of changes to the Route 682 project on other gravel road
ojects.
aff's meeting with VDOT focused on the effect that moving the
adow Creek Parkway up to a January, 1997 advertising date would
ve on the Rio Road project. Rio Road will be delayed one year
o July, 1996) because of the funding changes to get Meadow
eek advertised in January, 1997. However, even under the
enario of keeping Rio Road (or even a portion thereof from
rkmar Drive east towards u.S. 29) on the fastest track
ssible, it could not be advertised until the original date of
ly, 1995 because of VDOT plan development and public hearing
quirements. By that time, the first phase of U.S. 29 North
r construction, which includes improvements to Rio Road west to
about the Daily Progress property, will be virtually complete and
th second phase of U.S. 29 reconstruction will be underway.
Th refore, the benefits of trying to build the secondary plan
po tion of Rio Road concurrent with the U.S. 29 project portion
ca not be realized.
I
..
Jlbemarle County Board of Supervisors
I age 2
lebruary 25, 1993
~taff feels the adjusted schedule for Meadow Creek Parkway is
consistent with County priorities and a desire to see the City
end County sections built together. As there would be no
cverriding benefits to keeping other secondary projects on the
Irior schedule in lieu of moving Meadow Creek Parkway up, staff
concurs with the VDOT recommendation.
'twC/jcw
cc: Dan Roosevelt
PRIORITY
( 0 )
( 1 )
( 2 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
( 3 )
(4 )
( 5 )
( 6 )
( 6 )
( 7 )
( 8 )
( 9 )
( 10)
{1 H
( 1 2 )
( 13 ~
( 14)
{ 1 5 ~
( 1 6 ~
( 1 711
{ 1 8 ~
( 1 9
( 20 I)
(21
(22~
(23
(24
{25
(26
(27
ROUTE
631
625
664
684
692
729
738
788
800
810
708
654
631
631
671
631
678
743
631
691
866
631
656
601
649
691
651
627
682
610
712
711
760
-- 637
759
.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SIX YEAR PLAN
REVISED 10-92
PROJECT
0631-002-128,C503
CO. WIDE BUDGET ITEM
HATTON FERRY
0664-002 PLANT MIX
0684-002 PLANT MIX
0692-002 PLANT MIX
0729-002 PLANT MIX
0738-002 PLANT MIX
0788-002 PLANT MIX
0800-002 PLANT MIX
0810-002 PLANT MIX
CO. WIDE PLANT MIX
0708-002-241,C501
0654-002-242,C501
0631-002-128,C502
0631-002-128,B612
0671-002-191,B646
0631-002-224,C502
0678-002-223,C501
0743-002-153,C502 ---
0631-002-185,C501
0691-002-234,C501
0866-002-236,C501
0631-002- ,c
0656-002- ,c
0601-002-237,C501
0649-002-158,C501
0691-002- ,c
0651-002- ,B
0627-002- ,c
0682-002-P33,N501
0610-002-P ,N
0712-002-P ,N
0711-002-P ,N
0760-002-P , N --_______H__
0637-002-P,N ---
0759-002-P , N --------
o TNorC/7T~5 CII/J;f/{;Ej) /lfJl/. j}/IT~.s
PREVo
AD DATE
REV .
AD DATE
(DEFICIT)
7-92
7-92
7-92
7-93
7-93
7-92
7-93
7-93
7-92
7-92
7-94
1-94
6-92
1-99
1-99
11-92
7-92
2-94
6-94
7-95
2-94
7-96
1-2010
10-97
10-97
7-99
7-2000
7-2000
10-93
7-92
7-94
1-96
7-96 -----
7-96
7-97
7-97
1-97
1-97
7-94
7-96
7-97
7-99
10-99
7-2001
1-95
7-96
7-96
7-97
7-97
7-99
-------- DELETED
'''Ii.'''
.;
i i\\
~
\
..J
0 ~ 1.0 It) 1.0 It) "'3'
1-1 ~ It) t- t- O t- O
,::( It) <X) 0 ..... ..... C"') .....
E-l
0 1.0 ..... t- It) t- 1.0 "'3'
E-l ..... ..... 0"1 ~ 0"1 t- ~
..... ~ ..... C"') "'3' 1.0 0
C"') C"') C"') C"') C"') C"') 0
tA- tA- tA- tA- tA- tA- ~
tA-
t- "'3' 0 0 0"1 0 10 Ii:l Ii:l Ii:l
ll:: t- O 0 0 1.0 0 It) E-l E-l E-l
Ii:l It) 0 0 0 ..... 0 t- ,::( ,::( ,::(
:x: Q Q Q
E-l t- OO 0 0 "'3' 0 0"1
0 It) "'3' ..... 1.0 It) ..... C"')
0"1 ~ It) "'3' "'3' 1.0 ~
tA- tA- tA- tA- tA- tA-
C"') tJ
tA- E-l
Ii:l
Ul
::E Z ll::
,::( 0 0
ll:: H E-l
Ii:l t!J E-l ,::(
::E 1-1 0 ,::( t- C"') "'3' C"') t- O "'3' ll::
W ll:: ll:: tJ 1-1 1.0 "'3' <X) 1.0 0"1 1.0 ..... E-l
E-l ,::( a. 0 ,::( C"') t- It) 0 It) ~ 1.0 1-1 Ul
Ul ::E 1-1 ll:: ,::( ll:: H
>< Ii:l Z 1-1 Ii:l t- .- 0:> C"') "'3' 0 It) :> Ii:l Z
Ul ro 0 ,::( Q 0:> t- 0"1 It) 0"1 0:> 0:> 0 Ul Ii:l H
1-1 H Ii:l "'3' ~ 0"1 ..... ~ ~ "'3' ll:: ll:: Z ::E
>< ,::( E-' Q ~ a. 0 H Q
ll:: tJ Ii:l .- ~ .- ~ ~ ~ ~ a. Ul t!J ,::(
,::( D E-l tA- tA- tA- tA- tA- tA- ..... ,::( H Z .
Q >< ll:: ,::( tA- :> Ii:l 0
Z E-l E-l ::E ll:: tJ
0 Z Ul H Ii:l IE-l ,
tJ D Z E-l a. Z ~
r71 0 0 Ul D Ii:l ll::
Ul tJ tJ Ii:l Ul Q W
H 1-1
1.0 It) ~ ~ 0 It) 0 ~ Ul tJ
t- O 0"1 ..... "'3' ..... "'3' 0 Ii:l ,
E-l It) ..... "'3' ..... C"') ..... t- ll:: Z
. Q ,::(
Ul .- ~ 0:> ~ 0:> 1.0 <X) ll:: E-l ::E
t- 0"1 0:> ..... "'3' 0:> I 0"1 ,::( 0 ll::
3 1.0 1.0 1.0 t- t- t- ~ 0 Q H
Ii:l tA- tA- tA- tA- tA- tA- ro :> ,::(
z "'3' :x:
tA- tJ
C"') "'3' It) 1.0 t- o:>
ll:: 0"1 0"1 0"1 0"1 0"1 0"1
,::( I I I I I I
W ~ C"') "'3' It) 1.0 t-
>< 0"1 0"1 0"1 0"1 0"1 0"1 Ul
0"1 0"1 0"1 0"1 0"1 0"1 1-1
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ,::(
E-l
0
E-l
l
'"
en
'"
c...
~
UJ
t_
V)
>-
V)
>-
eo::
0:
=
:z:
=
'-'
UJ
V)
ct:::
UJ
c...
"" UJ
<Tl c...
<Tl -'
..... =
..... '-'
Ln
C>
.....
C> t_
..... '-'
eo::
'" t_
..... V)
'"
<=> "'"
f."
.(1/1
,
,
,
I
,
I
I <:> c> C> C) <:::>
: g ~ C) c;;. C>
I ~ ~ <:::> ~ ~
: tu g Ln fV") t:'J,.o C>
I --I ~ V LO ........,
I(.f) 0- "'" ~.,. ~ ~
! ~ ~8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
! ~ ~S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
: L)~;= m ~ ~ ~ ~
! ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
! ~~ ~~ I I~~ ~~, ~~ I~~ I
~-+-+~~----+~~-----t---___+______~~~____+~~____+______+~=____~~~____+______~_
: :~~~~ :~~gg :~<:>C>~ :<:>~~C> : <:::><:>gg :c:><:::>gg :~<:::><:::>~ :~<:::>gg :~c>gg :c:>C>c:>C> :
ii=gl i ~~! ! ! ~~ ! ;; 1 ! ~~ I ~~ I 1
: ~I-~ : : -'-4: : : : : : : : :
:a;., s: : : : : : : : : : :
t-+-~------~------~---____~______t______~______~______---L------t-----_t______~
: : IC>C>C>C> :c>~gg :c>c>gg :C>C>~C> :C>C>C>C) :C>C>C>C> : <:::>c:>C>c:> : <:>C>C>C> :C>C>~C> : <:::>C>C>C> :
! ! :r! ! i~..... ! ~~! Iii I ! ! !
: : g:; : : ~: : : : : : : : :
: :~: : : : : : : : : : :
I I I t I I . I t I I , I
~ t-~-------t------~-_____l--____t-----_!--____~-------~------t------t______~
:~: :C>c:><:::>c:> :c>c>gg :c>C)gg :C>C>~<:> :c:>C>c:>C> : <:>C>C>C> :C>C>~C> :C>C>~<:> ;~~~~ :~~~~ :
I C) , l:'- I , c::><::) , C)<.:::) I I I f I , I f
: t- : cr : : 00 : ~c:......: : : : : : : :
I a:: I U) I I ~<::> , ......--. 1 I I I I I I f
i~!~l !..........! ! ! ! II! ! 1
: ex:: : : : : : ; : : : : :
t t -t ooc;c;--t c;c;c;;c;--t C;c;C;o-.--t c;c;c;c;--t c;c;c;:c;--tc;c;c;c;--t <::>0<:><::> ---1.oooo--t C;C;C;C;--TC;oo<:> __j
t I I I <::><::> I C)c> 1 1 , , I r f I
: : ~ : : c>c> : C>C>: : : : : : : :
' a:::: I I I I C>C::> I C:>C> I I I 1 1 J , I
!~l~! ! ~~ I .......... I I I ! ! I ! i
: : : : : : : : : : : : :
I If' , I , , J I I I I
+ + -+ ------+ ------+ ------+ -------+ ------+ ------+ ------ + ------.---+ ------+ ------+
I I 1~<::>C)c> 1<::><::><::><::> 1C>c::><::><::> fc::>C)~~ 'C::>C>C>O Ic><::>c:>c:> 1C::>C)C>c> 1C>~~<::> IC:>C>~C::::> I <::>C>c:>c:> 1
: : Ln: : gg : gg: : : : : : : :
: <E: c:-' : : 00 : 00: : : : : : : :
I <.J , ""Q' . I c> c> I -"'~ f I I , I I I I
I (f')10"l1 I......~ I , I I I f I I I
I 10->>1 , I I I I I f I I I
: '-'- : -' : : : : : : : : : : :
I I I I I I I I I I I r r
I I , I I f I I I I I , I
+ .... -+ ------.... ------+ ------ + ------+ ------+ ------+ ------.--.... ------+ ~~------ + ------+
I 1 1C>c:>~C> 1<::>C>c:>~ I~~~c> I<::>C:>~~ I~C:>~C:> 1C:::>C:>~c:> I~~~~ I~~~~ I~~~~ I~~~~ I
I C3 I I I I C>c;:') I I I I fit I
f l.LJ I ...,.. I , I <=><::> 1 I I I . I I I
IJ__IO""JI I I -- I I f I f I I I
I L.> I I , 1 I c:>c:> J I 1 I I I 1 J
I LLJ I ,....., I I ,..-4....... I t I I f I I I
t~IO"1I f I I , . I I I I I
· c:;:) I en f , I f,. , , I I I
10:::1..-4 I I I , I I , I I I I
I a... I · 1 , , , I I I I J 1
I f I , J 1 I I I , I t I
,....., I I I I I I f I I I I I I
CT1+ -+ _+ ______+ ______+ _..______+ ______+ ______+______.... ______+_______+ ______....~______+
I I f 1C:>~~c:> I~~~O I~OOO 1c:>~<::>O 10000 1000<:> IC:>~<:>O I~c:>c:>c:> 'C:>OC:>O 10000 ,
~I I I ~C> I <:>~ I 00 , 0<:> I 1 I <::>0' I I <::>0 I
O'l I 1M' <:::'><::> f <:::>e> , <::>>0 f <::loC> I , I C)<::;> I , I <:::>c:> I
0-'1 I 10"\1 I , I I , 1 I J I I
-: :~: ~~ : gg : ~~ : ==: : : ~~: : : ~~ :
I I 0''1 I C'.IC"'..a I ........ -'" I I I I I I I I 1
I ,0->> I I I , , I I I I I 1
1 I.......' I I , . 1 I I I I 1
I , . I I I I I I I I I I
I I , I I r I I I I I I I
' 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I
+ -+ -+ ------+ ------...~ ------+------+ ------+------.... ------+------.... ------.-+------+
I IC>O~O Ic:>c:>e:>~ IOOC:><:::> ,c:>c:>~o IO<::>>C:><::> IOc>c:>c:> 'c;:')~~c:> I <::>O<=>c:> I<::>O~~ I~~~~ I
I~ I ~~ I ~C) , ~O I <::>~ . ~O f O~ I ~~ I ~o I. ~~ I ~~ ,
I~~~I ~~ f ~~ I c:>~ 1 ~~ I ~O 1 O~ I ~O I ~~ I O~ I 00 I
I :Z:::Z:lLJ I J f I 1 _ _ f I I I . I
I~-~, ~~ f O~ I O~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I 00 , ~~ I
I-~-, ~..-4 I ~~ I ~U) I -~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I
IJ__:Z:=:)I ("'-.1("'00.1 I l.D1...D 1 t , I I I I I I
I -::::lC!J I I I I I I I I I I I
1 ~L&.-l.LJ1 I I I I I I I 1 I f
1 ~ a:: , I I f I I I I 1 I I
I <X I I I I I I I I 1 f I
-+- ---+ -------+ ---------t- ---___..... _______+ ______..... ______+ ______.... ________+ _______..... ______+
I I~O~~ I~C>~~ IOO~~ I~~c>~ 10C:>C>~ 10~~~ I~OO~ I~~~~ I~~~~ I~OO~ I
I (n 1 COOC-~ I I f 1 I I I I I I
I =::l~ f c:><::> COco I I I I I I I I I I
I c::J:z: I - - - -, I r , , 1 I . , I
I I <::>OlT"lU"") I I I I I I t I I I
I =>~ I Ol..OC'......(X) I I t I I I I I I I
I l.LJ:Z: I t"'oI.......cn('.,f t I I I t t I I , I
Ia:::~ 1 I I I I I I I I I I
I D-U-. I ........("..1 I I I I I I , I I ,
I, I I I I I I I 1 . 1
I I I r I I I I I . f 1
+ ---+ ------ -1- ------+ -----,.- + -------t- _______+ ______+ ______ -+- _______+ ______+ ______+
1 I~~OO IO~OO IC>OOO IO~OO 10000 lO~~~ too~o 10000 1000<::> 100<::><::> I
' IOO~~, 00 I 0<::> I 00 I 00 1 ~o I ~o f 00 I ~c:> I oc:> I
I~ I~O~~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I O~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ 1 ~<::> t ~~ I
I UJ I - - - -C>--t 1 - -~co I - -("..to:) 1 - -('...t"""" I - -~"V . _ -"""'"'I:T I _ _('..If"'""') , _ -""'''''CT I _ -M-v I _ -('..I"""" I
11- I~~~~~~I ~~~~, <::>~~~I ~~~~f ~~O'~I ~""""~~I ~,......,~~, ~~O"\~I ~c>~ml ~~~~l
I~~ I~~~~~~I C>~~~. ~~~~I ~""""~~I ~~~~t ~~~en, ~~~~I ~~~O"\I ~""'~~I ~~~~I
I~~ I~~-~........-"'t ~~~~I --I ........-1 ........~I -"'_I ~~_l _~, ~~I ~..-41
I -C) I I I I I I , I , 1 I
J~~ I ~~~~, ~~I ~~I ~~I ~~I ~~, l:'-~I ~~I ~~I ~~I
I~ I C>~f ~O, ~C>I ~~I ~C>I C>~I ~~l ~~I ~~. ~~I
I UJ I t I . , I I I I I I
: :UJ=:z:-==:~==t-==:UJ=:z:t-==:~=:z:~==:UJ==t_==:~=:z:t_==:UJ==t_==:~=:z:_==lUJ==t_==:UJ3:z:t_==:
1 · ..........t::)C)a:U I ........c;:)C)a::<.J I ..........ClC)<X:<.J I ......~c::;)C:Ja:<.J I .'c:Jc::)<t:(,J I .........C>c::l<J:W, .,,-ooa:w I ........c;:)C)C1:W I ..........C)c::Ja::c-), .........,Clc::.Q:L>' I
I 1~~~~W~I~~~~l.LJUJI~~(J~UJWI~~U~W~I~~U~~~I~~~J__l.LJWI~~<.J~l.LJUJI~~UJ__~UJI~O:::fJt-l.LJWI~~fJ~l.LJWI
+ ---+ -------+. ------+ ------ + -------+ ------ + ------+ ------ + ------+ ------+ ------+
· I I I 'I I I
' I en I, <=- I I LLJ I
· I C"'..a 'f """" I I :z: 1
f I,...., 1 _ I 1 1
' I <::).. I --' ....... I , --I I
r :z: I Ln 1--- I --' Ul . I 'r
I C::) I <.Jet:: I c:x: - to.- ~ I f I
I -:x: I I t- u::IU') :>< Ul_ :x: :z: E::>< ::>< 0::: I :>< :><:E:: 1::>< C:JE:: I
I t--..-- I en.. I t.n:Z::E:: :>-:>-L:::2!:: :E:: I E I <.J I
I~~ 1 ~~~ Iw ~-~ ~ ~UJ ~ ~M E ~~C> ~ ~..-4 ~ I~ m~ ~ ~"Vm I~ ~ I
I-~ I _.Ln I~ -~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ Z~~J I ~~~ ~~~ f ~~.. 1
l.LJ I O:::LU I I -LD r I UJ_ lJ.J I UJ- ~ I l..OlD. ~ . r:-U'). t-- I c-.....CT'l.. t-, ..l$"). I t-- I LD("..I. t-- 1 ~LD. 1 t- 1 C:J_ I
-JlfJ--I 1~C"'..a~ I~~WUJ ~~ ~ ~~ C> ~("..I C> %~ l.D~ Z~~ ~ I~~ ~ ~~ ~ I~~..~ I
a::: I en I <:J:e> ..... I C:>O-~J-- C>LU t-- a:c:>...... <X:C>..I--." CCC:>.. <I:<::>.... I a:c:> .. .... 0:<:::>....... I <7:c..UJ........J.... I
crlLU I~~M~~ I~~- -l.LJ ~C>t--~LU ~<::>~~~ ~<::)~~~ ~C>~lLJ~ ~~~_~~ I~~UJLU~ ~~LULU~ I~~t-~~ ,
:E::: f ~ · a::: I ..1--.- I J__ I D-(J)~ C':) I <X:c::l(..O a... I J__~J__ Cl.. I t-_I-- (1-. II--J__,,_- CL. I .t-I-- I CL 11--....-1-- a... I t--t--t- f a.. IO::::Z:J__ t
~, I .......o~(n I:z:e> ~~ t--~~t-~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~a:::~~ ~~~L~ I m~~~ ~~~~ I ~ ~ I
CXlI 1c:J~.......::z: ':::::>C::>::3t.O=:.l t--f',fU.Jt--=:l ::a..o.....::;z: ::3a:t......:;z: :B:cn-.....:z: ::::Et('..f......'Z..; 1=3P..-).....z ~co......:z: 1:3C:>.....:;z:,
~I I-~~OLU 'c::l~l.LJ-CXl ~~~a:m UJ~~~UJ fLU~~~l.LJ LU~~~LU lLJ~~c::lLU IUJ~~~~ LU~~~LU ILUOO~~l.LJ 1
<XI Ia::::~~t--~ ,~~:z:~_ ~C:>~~_ ~O~t--~ I~<::>~t--~ :Z:O~t-~ ~~~t--~ I~~~~~ ~C)~t--~ 'ZO~I--~ f
+ ----+ ------+--------+ -------4 ------.+. ------+______+ ------..f- _________+ ______+______+
I t~~ I~~ LU I~~ l.LJ I~~ I~~ I~~ I~C) ,~~ I~U"") 1<::>("..1' ,
I I~C>~ Ie:> ~ I~LD ~ IlD~ I~~ ,~~ I~~ I~~ I~~ I~~ I
I IL.OL..O(X) -'0 Ct:: -ILD Ck: -'LO~ -ILD,....., -1t,Dr-l --IC--c> -f~C:> -'C"-O'l -1m,....., _I
ILU I~C-_~ I~ C':) 10 ~ I~~ t-- IC> t-- I~ t- I~~ t-- ,~_ ~._ I~ t- 'o~ ~ I
:>-11-- f -"'~~ ~I ~ ~I ~ ~I ~ ~t ~~, ~ ~I ~ ~I fJ ~I ~"""" ~ ~I
I--I~ J a: I , I ~ I C1: I a: I CC I ~ I a: I ~ I
.::z:1~ 1lJ.J ~LU fLU l.LJLU fLU LUlLJ lLU ~~ ILU ~LU IU.J ~U.J fLU ~~ ILU ~UJ ILU ~LU ILU ~U.J I
~I~ It-- t--t- I~ t-t-- II-- t--t- It-- t-t- It- ~t-- IJ__ t-t-- IJ__ t--t-- It-- t--t-- It-- t--t-- It- t-I-- 1
c::) 1 1 :;::)"...:Z<:l:_1 ~.._.a:a:-I :::>.......<:J::::<J:_I =::l......:z::a:_, :::>.......:z:<::I:_f :::)"..":Z:CJ:-l ~..".:Z:<:C-___I =::)"......:z:CI:--1 =:J".-.::Z:<:r:_1 :=)"....:2'.:CI:_1
~I I~~~~~ I~~~~t-- t~~~t-t-- I~~~~t- I~~~~t- I~~~~~ I~~~~~- I~~~~~ I~~~~~ I~~~~~ I
I I~t--~(n I~t-_~~ ,~~-~~ f~J___L.>~ I~t--L.>~ I~t-_~~ I~~-~m I~J___~~ I~t-_~~ I~~_~~ I
<0
0.'
,
::E:: c-
o: <Tl
eo:: <Tl
U1 ___
=-
eo:: V)
c...eo::
<:I:
:z:- '"
=- '-
- C>-'=
t_=......
'-'
:=J <=
eo::-
0-_
V)
:z:
=
'-'
'"-
""
'"
en
'"
a..
::r.:
UJ
t-
V>
,.-
V>
>-
a::
ee
<=>
=
=
c,
UJ
V>
a::
UJ
"" n...
UJ
CT1 a..
CT1 -'
~ =
" '-'
lO
<:::>
.....
<:::> >-
--' '-'
'" a::
t-
-+-> V>
'"
<=> <=>
; I I"" ,
, " .,..-.' ""if ~4'
I I
I I
I I
I I
I <:::> I
, = I
f ~ ~ ~ t
I c:> C> I
I c:> C> c:> I
I <:::> I
I c:> c:> <:> I
: ~ ~ ~ :
I .,. ~ .f:f't I
I I
I C:) (D ~ f
I ~ = ~ f
I I
I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
t ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
I U) Ul (f) I (.f) Ul UJ
I I
I ~~ ~~ ~~ I ~p~ ~~ ~~
I ~~ ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~~ ~~
' :z:, :z:, :Z::l I 2::1:Z:1 Zl
I ~~ ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~~ ~~
I ~~ ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~~ t~~
r f t~~ ~~ I~~ I I~~ ~~ l~~ I
+-+-~------l___-__~~=----+~~____t~~____~______+_____-~~~----+~~----~~~----t
: :~~~C:> :c:>~c:>~ :c:>o~C> :c:>~C>~ :c:>ogg :~C>C>o :~c:>~c:> :c>c:>gg :~~gg :~c:>gg :
:~ ~: : : : : <:::><:::>: : : ~~ : ~~ : ~~ :
I:Z: Lt.J I I , I 'C>C) J t I e>c:> I ................. , c:><::> I
:5~~: : : : : gg: : : gg : ~~ : gg :
let: :E:I I I I . I I I I I f
: CD s: : : : : : : : : : :
I I I I I I Iff , I I
+-+-+------+------+-------+------+------+------+-------+------+------+------+
I J Ic>c>c:>c:> 1C:>~c:>c:> 1C>c:>c>c:> fC:>~~C) IC:>C:>~~ Ic:>Oc>c:> 1C>c>c>e> lc:>c:>c:>c:> IC:>Oc:>c:> 'c:>c:>c:>c:> I
I I I 'OC:> I f I c:><::> I c:>c:> I , I I I
I I CD f I c;loC:> I I r __t........ I <:::>c.. I I I I I
I f O"l I , , I . I _ -. I I I I ,
· · I t I <:::>c:> I , I CT10"l I <:::><::> I J I I I
I I r::- I f e>c> I I I,.....,,......, I ""CJ"~ 1 I I I I
1 I 0--' I I ""('.I 1 I I CO CD I NC'ooI I I I I I
I I Q"l; 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I
1 · ....... I 1 f I I I I I I 1 I
: : : : : : : : : : : : :
~ ~-l-----_~------~------~"------l----__~-_____l-_----_t------l------~--____l
I~I 1C:>C:>C:>~ l~~c:>~ 1C:>C:>~c:> 1~C:>c:>~ IC:>c:>c:>c:> IC:>~c:>~ I~C:>~C:> l~~c:>~ IC:>C:>C:>~ Ic:>c:>c:>~ I
I Z. I f I c:> c:::::> I I I C)C> I c:>c;. I I I I I
1C),c-, I <=>C> I I 'C>c:> I c>c:> I I I I I
I 1()11 I I I I -._ I I I I I I
I I__ I f I f c>e> I I t c:>c:> I CoC> I I I I I
ICC.J.D1 , C:>C::>, I . C>C:> . LOLO, I I I I
I ~ 1 0'''' J 1 ('.I ('-oJ t I I l.OLO I """-)1'"") I I J I I
I c:::> I O"l , I 1 I f I I f I I I
' _.J I ~ r I I I I I I I I I I
I --1 I I I I t I , I I I I I
I CC I I I I I J I 1 I I I I
If. I I I I , I I I I I
+ +-+------+------+------+------+----~-+------+------+------+------+------+
I I IC:>C>C:>~ tc>c:>c>c:> IC:>~~C:> I~c:>c>c:> 1c:>........~C> l~~~~ I~~~~ I~~~~ I~~~~ I~~~~ ,
I I t t c:> <:::> I , t C::>CTl C> I C> <:::) c:> I , I , Ln U"l ,
I 'LOt I e>c:> I I I .....eD<=::> Ic::> c:::>c:> I I I I ('.I('-J ,
I I en J I I I I I _ . , I I I
1 a:::: t I f I <::>c:> I I t O""JOC:> I U") l/"lC> I t I I CO CD I
I~I~I I <:::><:::> I I I ~~<::> l~ ~c> I I I I ~~ I
I UJ I O"'t J I ('.,ft'J I I I ""'l:I"Lrl<::> I .....('.1, I t I "'IIl::I" "'C:J'" I
: >-: ~: : : : : : : : : : :
I I I f I I I , I I I , I
f I f I I f I , I , I I I
1 f . I I I I 1 I I I , I
-f-- -I- -..... -_______+ ______+ ______+ ______+ ______+ ______+ ___-;---__+ ______+ ______-+ ______+
J , 1<::><:::><::><:::) I<:::)<:::>~<::> IC:>C:>~<:::) f<::>c:><::><::> I <::><::><::>C> 1<::><::><::><::> 1C:><::>c:>c:> ,~<::>~C:> 1<::><::><:::><:::> I~~~C:> I
1 I I I C>C> I I I <::> <:::> 1 I t I I In,,,,,,,"c:> I
1 , l..O I I c::::> C> I I 1 C> C> I I I I I C'le- c:;. I
I-.Jlcn, I I I I.... _ I I , , I I
' <.C I I I I <:::> C:>, I I <:> C> I I I I I ,...,u:><::> I
I (..J t ~ I I c:><::>, , I <::> c::::> I I , I I "'IIC;t"C)U"') I
I (f) I (T'I , I f',J("'oo..I I 1 I 00 c) I , I I I (".1......,...-, I
I I en I I I I I.... I I I I I I
I La- I ~ I I , I I..... I , I I I ,
I I t I 1 1 I I I I , I ,
I I , I I I I 1 I I I I 1
1 , I , I I I I , I I I I
+ +-+------+------+------+------+------+------+-------+------+------+------+
1 I I C>c:><::>c:> I c:>c.C-c':? I <C)c:>......,..~'1" I c:;:..<::>c:>c> 1 <;::)<::>0<<::> I C:><"'-:O<:::;)C:) : )C.Ull!"'> I c:;.<::>u-:.ln 1 c.c;::.<,="c> I <::>r"-'C)r---J ~
I .::=. 1 I fit.....,,......, f I:"-t"-- I C) c:> I I ,......,....."") . LOL.O I I C:>~ -v I
1 UJ I """" I I I t:-C- I "'('-oJ I C) c:> I I "",,"~1" 1 Lr)t.r) 1 1<::::>1:- C- 1
ft-f~1 . 1 , ......... I I . I I __ I
f <-> I I I · I -........ I ~l.O I C> <::>. 'O""lcn, <::>c> I 'lr>LO........'
IUJI~I I J ~lr) I ~~ I <::> ~ I . ~~ . ~~, I~~ C- I
I~,enl · , I ~~ ,~~ I l~,......, 1 ~~ I f ~ lr) I
1c:1IC1"lI f f I I I f I I I I
10:=::1....... I I I tit J t , I I
I D- I 1 1 I I I I 1 , I I I
I I I I I I I , f I I I ,
,...., I I I I , I 1 . I I I I f I
0""1+ +_+ ______+______+ ______+______+ ______+______+ _______+ _______+ ______+ ______+
" I 1C:><::>c:>c:> 1<::::>~00C:> 1C)<::>Oc:> 1c:>c:>ooo IO~C:>O' ,<::>~c:>~ I~~OC:> I~~C-~ I <::>c:>c:><::> lO<::><::>c:> I
('....1 I I c:>c:> 1 I C)C) . <::>0 f 1 , I lD<:>LD I . I
O"l , I r""") I <:::)<::::> I 1,......,f'V1' I 0<::> I , I 'U'JCDf"'J I I I
0""1 I I 0."' I , , 1 - - I I I . I . I
........ 1 I f I en 0"" , I ('.1(',1 I <::><::>, I I I .......lr)[:'- I I I
: : ~ : ...,......: : ~~ : ~~: : : : g~~: : :
' I O"l I t I I 1 I I 1 I , I
f I........ I . I t I 1 I I I I I
I r , I t I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I f I , I I t
I J f I I I I I I I I I ,
+ -+ -+ ------+ -------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------ + --------+ ------+ ------+
I 1~C>C)c:> I <::::><=>c><::::> IC>C)~~ I <::>c:><::>C) 10.....0........ IC:>C:>O~ 1~C:>lr)t.r) I<:::>C:>~~ 1C:>~C>c> , <::><::><::::><::::> I
I~ I C:>c:> I <::><::> I ,......,,......, I ~~ I C>O<::> 10 <::>0 . ~r""") f ~C-~) I <::::>~ I~OO~ I
I~~~I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~ I ~~..... I~ ~~ I ~~ , ~~en J ~~ I~~~~ I
I :Z::Z:lLJ r I - - I · - -, . _ _ _ I I I _ _ I _ _ _ _ I
· c:::t-o::: t cncn I <::>0::::> I ~~" I l.Ol...O I cnc>CTl 1 LrJ U"'lC) I ~cn I ~u:J~ I l.Ol.D I &.r><=)U"')C) ,
I-~-, ~~ t <::>C> I ~~ I ~~ I ~O~ I~ ~C) I ~U~ I C:>~~ I <=>~ ,~~~~ I
1 t--::::2==:) I 'COcx:J I (".1("'.... I ~I'"") '0"lC>0'l , t:-CD r ,......,,......, I <::Jo,...,rv-l I ~'" '~lr)"'" I
1 -=:JC!f · , I I I I I I I , I
1 ~LLLLJ I t I I I .......,.....,...". I I I ........('"<o.f,...-, I 1........('.1 I
I c::. 0::::. t I I I . I 1 I I ,
J ex: I I , I I I J I , I ,
+ ---+ ------..... ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ -------+ ------+ ------+ ------+
I I~~~<::> .~~C)C) Ic)~~<::> I~C)~~ I~O""~~ t~~~~ 1~C)~~ I~~~~ IC>C><::>~ 'C>O~~ I
I~ I 1 1~~l.OC) I~(".I~<::::> IC>O"" 0"1 t l~ ~l.D I~~~~ IC>~C)C> .~ ~ I
I~~ I I I<=>~U"')~ 1~Lr)&.r')~ .~~ ~ t I~ ~~ I~~~~ I~~C:>~ 1<::> ~ I
:== : : :~~~O :OO~O :00 0: :~ ON :OO~~ :OO~~ :lO ~ :
.:=>.::::) I I tc:-lJ"')......~ It.nl.OCOC> ICTl........ C> I ICD COLD 1LJ"")lr)......,,....., 1C:-lr)("'..I~ 'CX) Q;) I
I~~ , I ......... 1__t,......,~C) I~~ ~ I I ~~ I&.r')~""""~ I ,......,~ I~ ...... I
· O::::;::::J I I I I I . I fit I
1 O-LL I I f I....... I 1 , I........"" I I I
I, I I I f 1 I I I I J
1 1 I I I I 1 I I I , f
+ ---+ ------~" ------+ ------..... ------+ ------+ ------+ --------+ ------.... ------+ ------+
I 1 <::>0 <=> 0 IC)~C)<::> tC)~O~ t~o~~ IOC>C>c> 1c>c>c>O I<::>~C)<::> I~<::>LD~ IC><:>C)<::> 1C)C)<::>c> I
' f C>c::> t 00 '<>1""""')01""') IC-~C-C- 1<:)<:::><:><::> Ie::> <:::>C) IC> C>c::> IC>LOC>\..D I <::>C>C>e> 1C)c>c;>c:> I
,~ I ~C) I ~O .~~~~ I~&.r')c-~ 1<::>0000 I~ ~~ t~ C)~ f~~~_~ 1~~~C) I~O~O I
I UJ I - -('.II""') I - -~(X) r - - - -,......,,.....,, - - _ -f',J........-J I -.... _ -t"-CO I _ .... -C'-CD . _ _('0.11"""") I _ _ _ _('.I"'" I _ _ _ _,.....,~ I _ _ _ .......t.rJ I
II__ , ~~~~, ~~~~,~~~~~~IC)<::::>~~~~Ic:>OOO~~I~ ~~~~IN c:>~~~.c:>~~~~~IOO<::::>O~~IOO~~~~,
l~~ I ~~~~I Oc:>~O"lJ~~~~~~I~~~CO~~I~U~O~~~I~ ~O~CTlI~ ~~~~I~~~~~~I~~M~~~I~~~~~~f
IE~ I ~~I ~eD~~1 ~~...............I~,.....,CD,......,__t__tl,......,~~~~....., ~~~~I ~~~~~I~~~O~"""'" ~~"""'~I~~~~~~1
' -c::) I I , I I -. _ _ I 1 f I I I
I~~ t ~~f ~l.Ol ~('.II ~LO~I ~I""')~~OI ~~, ~~J ~""""~C-~, ~~l ~~~~l
t~ I ~~l 001 ~........, OC>I 0........' ~__tl ~~I ~~f O~I 00,
· LJJ I I I I I J I I I I I
I I I .. I .. , .. I .. I .. I I .. I .. I .. I
I .~~~~~~IUJ~%I--~~'UJ3~~~~ILLJ~~~~~ILJJ~~~~~I~~~~~~I~~~~~~I~~~~~~I~~~I__~~IUJ~~I__~~I
I I ........C)C')CI:(.J I "'C)c::)<I:c.J I ........C)C)<I:<.-> I .'-c)c)<l:L't ..,C>c::)a::(.....) I ..........C)c::)<<:<-J I .........C)c::lCC<J I .........c::JCJ<J:<..J I ........CJC)<CL> I .........CJc:JCJ:LJ I
1 1~~~r-LLJUJ'~~<->~~UJ'~~~I--UJUJI~~<..J~UJUJI~~~I__WUJI~O::::;~I__~UJI~~<_>~~UJI~~L>~UJUJI~~~~UJLLJI~~~~WUJI
+ ---+ --------- + ------+ ------- -+ -------.. ------ + -------+ ------..... -------+ -------+- ------+
I J __t , f 1 I '<::)
f ,,......,....... 1 ::>- 1::>- I '~"TJ'" I U")
I c:::... r LO,......, I ct: I <J: I '1..O LD I ...........
' I--~ I........ l..O I ~ 3~ I~~ . LD ~I ~ I........ ~
~ : ~~ : ~~~ : ~ ~~UJ~ :~~ : ~ ~:~~~~ : ~ I__ ~
~ I I L>~~ I (J <J:<_>~~ l~~ I m _I~~~~ ,~~ ~L>
---..=c :3~""'''''''::E:f--, I ~ -LD ~ ---.lc:::l I 0... - I _en 1:2': _ I a: _
t--I-- :E: I a: I........ -. t <l:~c>~ a)-a:::: I co ........-i =>lrJ(.!] I LJJ~ . _ I,......,c:::-. Cl"""')C"---t.E:
~~ ~~ I ~~~ ,~LLJ~_ t~~~~C> ~~~~~ I~~~~ I ~~-~~lr-~~~~ I ~~~~ ~~~,......,
-~ ~~~ I ~~~ I ~.. -~ I~~_~~ ~........__~ I~~~UJ I ~UJ~~_I~~...~ I ~~.~ ~~~~
UJ 0::::l.LJ :x: I \.DLO - I :>C-Q:t-- I 1:E:E:.. I I . UJ .::x::a:.. I UJ I :::>UJ It=> ....._ I UJ I:E:.E.. I I :E: _ (...) I _
~ ~--.I -~ - I-~--.I I ~ ~ 1~~UJUJ~ ~~~~~ l~~c:::l~ I ~~~ ..~I ~ _ I ~UJ ~ -~UJUJ~
a::: (f) E: c> .. ..... I:E: CL. LU I c:> """"" r:- .. - 1:::-.:: C> I__ t-- .. . (..,.) c;:)o ... I <....> c::. <<;.J I c:> :z:: C) 0::: I . C> q- ~ _.. I c:> t-- c:> .. _ --1 ~ I-- t-- .. _
~ UJ ~UJUJ~ I ~ ~ I C>.......C>~ f~C>~~~ ~C)~~~ f3~LLJ~ . C:>lU~:z:: I~~~~~ I C:>~~~ ~~~~~
:E:: ~ J-- I t--.....-t- I I__I__>-ex: , 1...1-- I a: I Clc='lt-- c::J I <-><nl-- I c::> , (..!:Jc;:) I I r..!:l:E: .. I U") I .. -I__ I I C).I__ <:J: , C)C)t--
UJ ~C>~~~ I~~~~ I ~~c:>~ l~q-a::::~~ ~........~~~ I~_~~ f _~~ -~l -_.<::>(..0 I ~a::::~~ O::::;~O:::O::::;(..O
CX:' <::1:......-..._ -..:z:: I Cl:=:J0-0::::; I <::> -. ..-:z:: I O::::ln... _..::z: <:1:1""')..- ..-::z: I ex:""""-<J: t e---...c::>o-....::LL.. I :x:,.....,.- -.::2: I C-." ..-:z: Ct"""::::l""... ...:z:
~l --1~~~UJ I~~~~ J c-~C::>UJ 1~~a:::~UJ UJ~a::::~UJ IUJ~~UJ ,~~~....-~tt-~a:::~UJ' ~O::::~UJ ~r:-a:::~~
~I ~~~~~ l~<_>a:~ I ~~I--~ I~~~I--~ EC>~t----.I 1:E:C>~:E: I c:>~~~~IUl~~t----1 I <::>~~--.I XC:>~I__~
+ --- -+- ------ + ------+ ------+ ------+ ------ + ------+ ---------- + --------- + ---.-----..... ------+
I 1C:>~ 1<::><::> l~~ I~C:> I~O 1........<::> '~~c:> l~~ f~~ I,......,~ I
' f........~ .<::::> IC>~~ 1lr)~C> t~ ~ 'I""') ~ .~~~ I~~~ t~~~ l~~_ I
I I~~ -Ie> -I~~. -I~~O _.~ ~ _I~ ~ _I~~~ _I~~~ _I~~"""," _I~~~ _,
IUJ 1<::> I-- 1<::> t-- 1<::::> ~I-- lc>r:-_I-- 10 ~I-- Ic> ~t-- I~ ~~ t~~~~~- ,~~~~ I~~~~ I
~,~ I ~ ~J ~ ~I ~~ ~I -~~ ~I ~~ ~I ~U ~I ~~ ~I """'"~ ~r ~(...) ~l ~~~ 01
t-I~ r ~ , ~ t ~ J ~ , ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ ~I
~I~ I~ ~~ ,~ ~LLJ f~ ~LU ILLJ ~~ .~ ~ 'UJ ~~ I~ ~~ I~ ~ I~ ~~)~ ~ I
~IO:=:: It- ~~ l~ ~~ ,1__ ~~ ,~ I__~ I~ ~ It-- ~~ It-- ~~ II__ ~ II__ t--~ I~ ~ t
CJ I I =:J......~:::7.:a:_1 =:l-.....:z::c:r:-l =:l........::zc:r:_l ::::>.....-:z:c:J:-1 :::=-.......:z: -J ::::>.......::z:(.I')_1 =::J.......:;z:U"J_1 ;:::)"-..-2: _I ::;:).......:z:CC_1 ::::;)......::z: _,
~I I~~~~I-- t~~~~~ I~~~~I-- I~~~~I__ r~u~c(.l') I~~~~~ I~~~~~ ,~~~~~ I~~~~f-- t~~~~~ I
I IO::::;~-~~ I~~-~~ I~~-<_>~ I~t-_~~ J~~_~~ I~~_~~ I~~_~m l~~_~~ I~~_(...)~ ,~~_~~ I
=
c>
c>
=
=
<=>
=
=
=
<:::>
=
=
<::>
=
c>
U)
=
""
...
--'
...
V>
t-
=
UJ
JE::
JE::
=
'-'
~
v>
'-"
=
<.<:I
=
<.<:I
z:.
co
eTl
,
JE:: t-
ee CT1
a:: <T>
<.<:I --'
CI-
a:: V>
CL a::
ee
=- ='
=-~
_ 0-<::
t- <=> -+->
'-'
= <=
a::-
t--
V>
=
=
'-'
~
~
~
\J
~.
I,:}
>\J
~,
.~
~.'
z.::)
t::' .~
...) ,
\i,.) <'..
,
,~ '
\',
.~ ~
~ ~.:
'"'i~
~
~<\)
~
~~
~ I"
" ~
~
~
~ "-,
~l
\J '
'- ~
~ <'\
D
..-.
::IE::
LU
~--
(D
>-
Ul
>-
Q:
<C
<=>
=
<=>
<J
LU
Ul
=
en
,
:E: t-
= en
Q: en
= -
<=>~
Q:Ul
0...Q:
=
=- =>
=-~
_ C>-<=
o_=-+-
<J
:::::> <=
Q:-
0__
Ul
=
=
<J
,
,
,
,
,
,
~l i:
~~ I _~
- ,-
,
= ,=
~ 'l~
,
Q: , Q:
= '=
:z: , =
Ul , Ul
,
LU t- UJ -.:r- UJ = LU = , UJ-.:r-
:::::>en = en:::::>en =en , = en
=, =, =, =, '='
UJ u:> LU ..-. LU t- LU t- , LU..-.
::> en ::> en :::> en ::> en , => en
LU en UJ en LU en LU en , LU en
' 'Q:- ,=..... ,""'....., ,0<....., " ,Q:.....
+ - + -+ ------ + ------+ ------ + ------+ ------+ ------ + --------- + ------+ --------+ --------+
' ,==== '==== '==t-t- ,-==- ,==__ '=en=en 1<::>..-.=,.., ,==== ,==== ,==== ,
' ,==, == , en en ,,..,==..-. , enCTI ,_=_ I === '''-'==''-' ,==== ,==== ,
'LU UJ' == I == , ~~ I~==~ , ....._. ,_=..... I _=_ ,.....==..... ,==== ,==== I
'<Jo_, -- I , '____, , ,___, ,____, ,
,= LU, == , ~U, , == ,==== , ..-...-. ,=== ,~=,.., ,.....,..,=-.:r- ,~~== ,,..,.....u:>= ,
:5~~: gg : u:>u:> : ~~ :b~g~ : ~~ : ~~~ : ~~b : ~~~ : _~~ : CTl8 :
,a: :E:' , , ,----, , , , , , I
'''''' =, , , , .....t-.....en' , , , , I ,
' <J , , , ,.........., , , , , , ,
" , , , , , , , , , I
+ -+ -+ -------+ ------+ ------+ ---------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ -------+ ------+ -------+
' , ,==u:>u:> ,==== ,=~== ,==== ,=_~= '=_=_ ,,..,t-== ,~==~ ,==== ,==== ,
' , , -....., 't-~= ,= = I en== '= = '=en = 'u:> ~ ,= =, ,
' ,=, -.:r-_ I 'CTI== ,= = ,.....=c::> '= = ,_~ = ,= = ,= =, ,
' '<7', , , I , ,-, __ _, , , I
' '" U:>u:>, '~-.:r-= ,= = '''''U:>= 'CTI en ,t-u:>..... ,= = ,= = 1 ,
: :~: ~~: : ~~~ :~ ~ : ~~~ : <7' <7' :u:> t- :u:> u:> :~ ~: :
' 'CTI , , , , , , , , I , ,
' , ..... , , , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , 1 ,
' , , , , , , , , , I , ,
+ +-+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+-------+
'Ul, ,==== ,==== ,=,..,=..-. ,u:>==u:> ,_u:>== ,==== .t-==t- ,==== ,==== ,==== 1
' = , ,~== I , = = , u:> u:> '<7'= = , = = , 0' 0-' I = =, 1 ,
,=,t-, t-~=, , _ _ 't- t- ,.....= = ,= = ,~ ~ ,= =, I I
' 'en, , , , , ,_, _, , , ,
,0_, "u:>,..,=, , t- t- 'u:> u:> ,~u:> ~ ,= = I~ ~ ,= = I , I
,=,u:>, -~-, , _ _ 'en <7' ,~,.., <7' '= = ,~ ~ I~ ~, , I
' <J , 0" t- ~en, , I ,....., _ ....., , , I ,
' =, 0" , I , , , , , 1 . I
' -1 , ..... , 1 , , , , , , , , I
' -1 , , , , I , I , , , I I
'0:, , , , , , , , , , , I
' , , , , , , , I , , , ,
+ + -+ ------ + -------+ ------ + -------+ ------ + -------+ ------ + ---------+ ------- + -------+
' , ,==== '==== ,==== ,==== ,u:>==u:> .==== .==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,
' , , = = I , = = ,= = ,= = ,= =, , , , ,
' ,U:>, = =, , = = ,= = 'CD CD '= =, 1 . , ,
' '<7', _, ,_ - · - - ,_ _, _, , , , ,
'Q:, " = =, 1 ~ ~ ,~ ~ ,- _ ,= =, , , , I
,=,~, = =, , .,... t- 't- t- ,_ - ,~ ~, , , , ,
'LU,<7" ..... -, , , , , , 1 , , I
: :>- : ~ : : : : : : : : : : :
' , , , , , 1 1 , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , I , , , ,
+ + -+ ------+ -------+ -------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ -------+
' , ,-==- ,==== ,~~== '==== ,==== .==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,
' , '=0:> CD. ,.,...~ = , <=> =, , , , , , ,
' ,u-, ,,..,~ ~, '''''u:> <=> , <=> <=>, , I I , , ,
'-1'0" -, 1 __ - ,_ _, , , , , , ,
' =, , ,== CD, ,=..... <=> , = =, , , , , , ,
' <J , - ,-<=> -, ,-~ = , = =, , 1 , , , ,
'Ul'<7" u:> u:> 1 '..... ,..... ....., , , , 1 . ,
' '<7' , , , , 1 , , , , , ,
' LL. , ..... , , I , , , , , , , ,
' , , 1 , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , ,
+ + -+ ------+ -------+ ------+--------+ ------+-------+ ---------+-------+ -------+--------+-
' 1 ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== 1==== ,==== ,==== '==0= ,
,=, , , , , , , . , , , I
' LU , _ , , , , , , , , , , ,
' 0_ , en I , , , , , , , , , ,
' <J, , , , , , , , , I , , ,
' LU , ....., , , 1 , , , , , , , ,
' 0--, , 0' , , , , , , , , , , ,
' = , en , , , , , , I , , , ,
' De , ..... , , , , , , , , I , ,
' a. 1 I , , , , , , 1 , , ,
' , I , , I , , , , , , ,
,.., , , , , , , , 1 , , , , ,
<7' + + _+ ______+ _______+ ______+ ______+ ______+ ______+ ______ + _______ ______+ ______+
" , ,==== ,==== ''''''==t- ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== '==== 1
".J, , , , , t- t-, , , I , , , ,
en, ,..-., , ,~~ I 1 , , 1 I , ,
en, 'en, , ,-, , , , I 1 , I
....., '" , ,= =, , I 1 , I , ,
' ,~, , ,.........., , , , , I , ,
' ,en , 1 1 , 1 , , , I , ,
1 , <7' , , , , , . , , , I ,
' ,..... , , , , , , , , I , 1
' , , , , 1 , , , , , , 1
' , , , , , , , , , I , ,
' , I , , , , . I , , , ,
+ -+ -+ ------ + ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ --------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+
' ,_=u:>= ,==== '~=~t- ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== '==== ,
'-1 '==en= , == '~=~t- ,==== ,==== ,==== 1==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,
,===,..-.=u:>= , == 'U:>=,..,en ,==== ,==== '==0= ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,
' ==LU . ,_ _ ,_ _ _ _ ,_ _ _ _ ,_ _ _ _ ,_ _ _ _ ,_ _ _ _, , _ _ _ _ ,_ _ _ _ ,
'=-='=~en~ , ~~ IO:>=_~ ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,~..-.=U, ,~~== .,..,.....u:>= ,
,-=-,.....~..-.= , u:>u:> ,~=o:>_ ,==== '=~Ln= ,~=~= I~~,..,= ,..........=~ ,~_== , en= ,
,~==, t-t-~, ,~~~ I~~== ,.....,..,1.0= I.....~=~ '.....~CD~ ,.....~oo..... , .....~ , ..... ,
' -== , , , , - - - -, , , 1 , , 1
' =LL.LU' ..........,.." , , ..............=, , , , , , 1
,= =, , , ,.........., , , , , , ,
,=, , , , , , , , , , 1
+---+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+-----+
' ,u:>==u:> '==== '===0:> ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== '0=== ,
· Ul , en en , ==== , ..... -, , , , , , 1 ,
,== 'u:> u:> 1 ==== , ,.., ,.." , , , , , , ,
,== , - , , , , , , , , , ,
' , Ln ~ , =~=~ , ..... ....., , , , , , , ,
,::>= ,..... - , ,..,-.....0:> , en en I , , 1 , , , ,
'UJ= ,..... ~ 1 ,.........., , , , , , 1 ,
'De= , , , , , , , , , , ,
'o...lL. , , , , , , , , , , 1
" , , , , , . , , , ,
" 1 , , , , , , , I ,
+ ---+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ---------+ ------+ ------+
· .==U:>U:> ,==== ,==~~ ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== .==== .==== ,
' , ==0-'<7' , ==== , =O~~ , ==== , ==== , ==== , ==== , ==0= , ==== , ==== ,
,= ,==u:>u:> '==== I==,..,~ ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== ,
' LU ,- - - -<'ot-, - - - ---, - - - -....oo, _ _ _ _=,.." _ _ _ -t-oo. _ _ _ -en = , _ _ _ -en.....' _ _ _ _=....., _ _ _ _.....~, _ _ _ ..,.-,_ ,
,~ ,u:>~<7'O<7'<7"=LnLn=en<7"==__en<7',====..........'o===enall====en=,====<7'=,~,..,=~=='~~====''''''''''~=encn,
'=0_ 'CD~~~enen',..,.........~enen'~==,..,enenl======'=~~=enen'~=~=en=,~~,..,=<7'=,_.....=~==,1.0_====, en=en<7' 1
'=Ul ,......,...t-t-_....., ...............,~~~t--.....,LnLn==~.....,.....,..,~=..........,_~=Ln.....~,.....~oo~.....~,_~=_~~, _~N~' .........._,
:~S : ..........,..,....=: ~.,...: ~~....t-l~~~o..........: -==1 ~....=: _=~: -t-=l ....=: =U:>:
IUl, =....., ==, ==, ..........==, ....._, =....., .....=, =....., =....., .....=,
' LU, , , , , , , , , , ,
: :LU~=0-==:~~=0-==:~~=0_==:LU3=0_==:LU==0_==:~==~==:~==0_==:~==~==:LU~=o_==:~~=~==:
' · "==a:<J' "==a::<J I -'==a::<J' .'.===<J' "===<J' .'-==a::<J' "===<J 1 -'.===<J, -'===<J' "==O:<J I
' Ia.De<Jo-LUUJ'a.Q:<Jo-LULU'O"'Q:<J~WLU'O"'De<Jo_LULU'O"'=<J~LULU'a.Q:<Jo_WLU'O"'Q:<J~WUJ,a.Q:<J~-UJLU'o...~<Jo_LULUlo...Q:<J~LULUI
+ ----+ -------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------- + -------+ ------+ ------+
I, , , , ,
'I , 1 ,
" 1 , ,
: : ~ : ~.-= : LU~ ~ ~2 ~ = : ~g
:~ : ~ : ~ Ul_ :2~ ~<J ~<J ~ ~ ~ <J "'" ~:~Ul
'--:z: , ,-=== 'Q: -~::IE:: 0... - 7.:: = - - :>- FO ~J- 'Vl_
,0__ , ~ ~= ,~--= ,=u:>~~ en Q: _,..,= t-== =0:> u:> =_= =~=I=
'0...= '0:>0'...- 'UJ~~_=, ""__<7' :>oc =-= u,_ ,..,~ 0: ,na'=,.., _0'> n:o:_= , 0::
,-= , -~t-t- 'UJ~ =- 'Q:~t-.....u:> LU =U:>. = u:>t-o:> N~<7'''''' =.....~u::l= ~u:>~ LU=U:>_'<J
UJ 'Q:u, " ., =,. . 'LU, . LU ,= ~ = , . 1 <'..0 _ Q: , . , . ':::>0:: 0_, , =
-1'<J-1 '=~LULU= I~~UJ.= '-NLULU= 0::<'..oQ:. =~LULU= ~UJ = ~~UJ= ~~UJ_ ~=-1 '='=~ UJ
0:: , Ul , ==o_~.. 'Ul=~o_ -- 'Q:=o_o_ -. <J= LU -. o_=o_~.. C>O_ ... >--='-0_ __ =1--0_.. = -'CJDe' <J:=UlQ:
='LU ,===== 1 =Ck:== ,==:::::>:::::>= ===o_:z: UJ==:::::>:z: ==LU:Z: 0::==== ==== =UJ== '==~Q:
ffi:= :Ck:~~~~ :~~ --~ :~~~~~ g~~Q:~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~Ck: .~:~~~~ 1
0', , , 0,..,.. .-= '=eno_== 'LUu:> -. -.= =,.., -. --= =~ -'''= =.. ..= =_ _'''= 01 __ ._= ~-:><Q:LL. , .-<.....u:r 1
-1, '-U:>=OLU 'O:U:>==UJ 'Ck:CDCk:=LU UJU:>Q:=LU LUu:>Ck:=LU U:>==LU -U:>Q:=LU u::l==LU U:>Q:Ul~:::::>'=u:>_o_ ,
=, '~=LL.o_-1 '~=-=-1 '==LL.~-1 = =LL. 0_-1 ==LL.0_-1 =LL.0_-1 ==LL.0_-1 =LL.~-1 ==<JUl~'o::=Ul= ,
+ ---+ ------+ --------+ ------+ ------+ ------ + -------+ -----------+ ------+ ------+ ------+
I ,.....u:> ,-= LU ,u:>= ,.....= ,u:>= ,.......... 1 en..... '-.....en '_en I~,.., ,
' '''''CD<7' 'en~en<J 'u:> - ''''' ,~= ,=..-..... ,__u:> Icn~N ,~= 'NO:> ,
' ,U:>U:>_ -'u:>t-== -,0:>..... -'u:> ~,u:>~ ~'<.ocn= ~,u:>_~ ~Iu::l=_ ~'u::l_ ~'u:> ~,
' LU , =....._0_ , =-== ,= CD~ , = 0_ ,=,.., ~ , =,..,=~- , =,..,_~ , =..........~ , = _ 10 0_ I
:>-,0_ ,.....~<J....., O:>LL.~, O:><J~, <J...-, _ <J Ln' O:><J U:>, .....~<J t-, .....<J =, <J en, <J =,
0_,:::::> · =....., ....., a: -, =....., = _, = _, =....., = _, 0:....., O:~,
=,= 'LU = 'UJ LULU 'LU =UJ 'LU Q:UJ 'LU Q: 'W Q: 'UJ 0:: ,~ = ILU Q:~ ,~ Q: ,
='Ck: ,0_ 0_ ,~ 0_0_ ,0_ 0_0_ ,~ 0_0_ ,0_ 0_ '0_ 0_ ,_ _ ,_ _ ,0_ 0_= ,_ 0_ ,
=, ,=....= -, =..--==-, =....==-, =..-.==-, =..--= -, =....= -, =..--= -, =-"'= -, =-"'=Ul_, =::>.-.-=a.-,
<J, '=<JC>OUl '=<J=__ 'O<J==O_ '=<J==o_ '=<J==~ 'O~=O~ 'O<J=O~ '=<J==~ 'O<J==Ck: 'C)<J==Q: ,
' 'Q:O_-~Q: 'Q:o__UlUl ,~O__~~ 'O::O__<JUl ,Q:O_-<JCk: '~~-<JQ: 1~0__<JCk: IQ:__<JQ: '~O__<J"'" 'Ck:o__<JQ: ,
=
=
=
OJ
0')
'"
0...
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
;/
...
-
-
~
u:>
-
Ul
~
=
LU
=
::IE::
=
<J
=
=
Q:
=
=
Ul
=
=
Q:
=
=
Ul
=
=
Q:
=
=
Ul
Ck::
LU
~ a.
LU
<7' a.
<7' -1
..... =
"- <J
~
=
'.
<:::> 0_
..... <J
OJ 0::
0_
-+- ~
'"
= =
l',..,
,,oft
(~
, .
;'l,l
~,.
=
UJ
.....
Ul
>-
Ul
>-
0::
=
=
=
=
L>
UJ
Ul
=
0-0
,
:E: e-
= 0-0
0:: 0-0
= ~~
=~
0:: Ul
a... =
=
::z:-- =-
=- -
- c>..c
.....=.....
L>
= 0=
0::-
.....-
<.n
=
=
L>
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
"
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
" , , " ", I,
+ -.... -+ -------+--------+ -------.... -------+- ------+-------+ -.._------+--------+- ------+- ---------f
1 , ==== I ==== I 0=== , ==== , ==== , ==== , =C>t-'e--, , , ,
'I , , , I , '''''''' I , , I
'UJ UJ I I , , , , 'oJ:)u:l, , , ,
'L> 0---, , I , , , , , , I I
I = UJ, , , , , , '<nm, I I I
' ":I: =..J , , , , , , 'u:lu:J I , , ,
' ..J.....a... , , I I , , 'e--e--, I I ,
,= =, , , , I 1 , I , , I
,a:> = I , , , I , I , , , I
I L> , , , I , I , , I , ,
'I , , , , I , , , , ,
+- -+- -+- ------- +- --------+- -------.... ------+- -------- +- ------- +- -------- +- --------+- ------ + ----------f
' , 1 ==== , ==== , ===c> , ==== , ="'='" , =C:'== , C>=I"",,..., 1 , , I
I , , , , I ,..".=..". I === , ==e--e--, , I ,
I , = , , , , ,e-=e-, === , ==,...,,..., I , , ,
1 'A' , , , , , ,_ _ _ ,_ _ _ _, , , ,
I " I , , , ,.....=....., """=.... , ""=u->=, 1 , ,
' 'e-I , 1 I I "'''' , ,...,,..., '''',...,e-,..., I , , I
I , A' I I , , I,...,,...,,,...,,...,,....., , I ,
' ,m, I , , , , , I I , ,
' , ..... , , , , , , , , , , ,
' , , 1 , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , 1 , , , , , ,
' I , , , I , , 1 , , , ,
+- +- -+ ------+- -------+ ------+ -------+ ------+ -------+ ------+ ----------+ --------+ ----------+
'<.n' ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==........ ,==== ,==== ,==== I , , ,
' =, , , '==, e-e- I =u-> Ln '== =, , , , I
' = , e-- , , 'U->Ln' LnU-> 1 ='" '" '== =, , , , ,
11m, , 1 , , , , , , , ,
' ....., , , , ,.........., '" '" I Ln,..., = , u-> _~ u:l I I , , ,
1 = , u:J , I '==, mo-o ,.......... "" I.......... "" 1 , , , ,
' L>, m, 1 ''''''''''''''''''''''' , , , , I I
' = , en , , , , I I , , , , ,
' ..J , ..... 1 , , , , , , , , , 1
' ..J , , I I , , , , 1 1 I ,
,=, , 1 , I , , , , I , ,
' , I , , , , , , , , , ,
+ + -+ ------+- ------+- ------+- ------+ ------ +- ------+ ------- + ------+ ------+ -------+
1 , 1==== 1==u:lu:J ,==== '==u:lu:l ,==== '==== ,====, 1 1 ,
' , , '==, == , =="""'" , , 1 , , ,
' , u:l , 'u:lu:l, == 1=0........, 1 , , , , ,
' ,m, , , ,____, , 1 , , , ,
I 0::, I , '''<1""''"' 0= I U->="<I"e- 1 , , , , I ,
' = I Ln , I =0 1 Ln"~ , ..........""u-> , , , , , , ,
I UJ I en I '''''''''' "<1""<1", , , , , I , ,
,>-, m, , I I I , I , I 1 ,
1 ,..... , , , , , , , I I 1 I
' , , , , I 1 , 1 1 , , ,
1 , 1 , I I I , , , , , 1
' 1 , , , , , I , , I I ,
+ + -+ ------+ -------+ --------f- ---____+______+ ______+ ______+_______.... _______+_______+
' I '===0 '=0== ,=="""" ,==== ,==== '==== ,====, I , I
' , , '=c>, ==mO', I 1 , , , I I ,
' ,u->, '== '=="<1"""", I , , I , I ,
I ..J , m 1 , , , , I , , , , ,
' =, , , '0=, LnO,...,= I , , , , , , ,
' '-' , .... , '=0, "",...,,...,=, , , , , , I ,
' <.n , (To , ,LnLn,.........., , 1 , 1 , , ,
' , en , , , I , , I , , I 1
I..... , ..... , , , , , I , , , , ,
1 , , I , , I , , , , I ,
' , , 1 1 , , , , , , I ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , ,
.... .... -+ -------+ -------+- -----.---+ -------+ -------.... --------+. ---------+-------+ ------+------....
' , 1 ==== , ==,.n:,n , <-><:""'::>e> , ==== , ==== , =,,~,== , "-'~<:""c:,.-_>, , , ,
1 =1 , '='0, , , , , , , , ,
1 UJ , -- 1 ,.........., I , , , , , I ,
I~-'en, , , , , I , , , , ,
' 'J' , I ''''''''' , , I , , , , ,
' UJ , ,." , 'meT', , , , , I , , I
' ...... 1 0-0 , I u:lu:l, , , , I , 1 , ,
:~l sr::: : : : : : : : : : :
' a... , , , , , , 1 , , , , ,
1 I , , 1 I , , , , , , ,
,..., , I , , , , , , , , I , ,
0->.... .... __+ ______+ ______+ _______.... _______+ ______+ ______+ ______+ _______+ ______.... _______....
" 1 ,==== '==u:lu:J ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== '=0==, I , ,
"" , , '0 == 1 =Ln""e-, , , , , 1 1 , ,
0-> , 1 I") '0 == , ==e--Ln I , , , , , , , ,
m, 'CTI, --, , , , , , , 1 , ,
..... , "I Ln Ln= , =....u:l....., , I , , , , , ,
' 1 '" , 0->= , e-=o->e-, I , , , , , I ,
' , 0-> , ..... ,__,..., Ln, , , , , , , , ,
' , CTI , 1 1 , , , , , , , ,
' , ..... , , , I , , , , 1 , I
' , , , , , , 1 , , , , 1
' , 1 , I , 1 , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , I , , , ,
.... -+ -.... ------+ -------+ -------+ ------+ ------+ -------+ -------+ -------+ -------+ ------....
I , ==== , ==e--e-- , 0=00 , ==0= 1 0=0= , ==== 1 ====, , , ,
I..J ,= 0= ,=Ln.....~ '==0= '=0=0 ,==~= ,==== ,====, , , ,
,===,= == '==Ln,..., '0=== '=0== ,==== ,==== ,==== 1 , , ,
la=~:~ ~o :O~Mm :Ln=~= :~m~o l~~oo :~~oo : Ln=LnO : : : I
'-=-1 0->= 'e-=o->u:l ''''''''''=__ ,...............Ln '--~Ln ,..........,...,u:J I~""'''<I"=, , , ,
,.....==, ..... ,.....,...,"<1"0-> , =m , "<1""<1" , ~~ , ~,..., , =m, , , ,
,-==, 1 , , , , , 1 , , ,
'=.....LU' , , 1 , , , , , , ,
,= =, , , , , , , , , I 1
,=, , , I , , , , , , ,
+ ---+ ------+ -------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ ------+ -------+ ------.... ------+
' ,==== ,==,...,,..., ,==== ,==== ,==== ,==== 1====, , , ,
' <.n, , ====, I , 1 , , , I ,
,== , '==""""<1", , 1 , , , , I ,
,== , , - - - -, , , , , , , , I
" , ==u:lu:l, , , , , , , , ,
,== , , CO""""Ln, 1 I , , , , , ,
'UJ= 1 '..... 1 , , 1 1 I , , ,
'0::= , , , , , 1 , , , I ,
1 a........ 1 , I 1 , , , , , , I
" 1 , , , , , , , , ,
'I , 1 I I , , , , , ,
+ ---+ ------- + ------+ ------- +- ------+ ------ + ------+ ------ + --------+ ------+ - ._-----....
' 10=0= '=0== ,==== ,==== ,==== '=0== ,====, I , ,
1 ,= == , =LnOLn , =0== '===0 , ~==O ,==== , ==0=, , , ,
,= '0 == ,==== 1==== ,==== 1==== ,==== '0=== 1 1 , 1
I UJ , - -Lnu:l' - - - -Lnu:l 1 - - - -u:le--, - - _ -~e-, _ _ _ -I:-CO' _ _ _ -e-=, _ _ _ -0->= , , , ,
,..... 'Ln Ln=CTICTI '=....=....o->m' Ln=Ln=O-Oo-> ILn=e-OCTICTI'LnLnO=CTICT1 'LnLnO=CTIm, Ln=LnOO->= , , , ,
,=~, CTI=mCTI'~""Ln""mm''''',...,=''<I"CTICT1'_....._LnCTICTI'_.....'''Lnmml__,...,u:lCTICTI''''',...,__=O->=, , 1 I
':E::Ul I .........._,"",...,Ln_.........., =0->.........., "<1".............., ,...,~.........., ,...,,...,.........., =o->.....~, , , ,
,-= , , , , , , , 1 , 1 ,
,-'-' 1 .....,..." ....."".....,..." e-=, 1:-=, e-=, e-o, e--=, , , 1
'<.n, ==, ==, =_, =....., =....., =....., =_, , , ,
' UJ, , 1 , , , , I , , 1
: :UJ~=.....==:UJ3=-==:UJ~=.....==:~==.....==IUJ~=_==I~==_==:UJ==.....==: : I :
' I .'==ccu, .~,==cc'-' I "==CCL> I .,==='-', .,==cc'-' I .,==cc'-', '~'==='--" 1 I I
"a...O::'-'.....UJUJ,a...~L>.....UJUJ'~='-'.....UJUJ,a...O::~.....UJUJ,a...O::'-'.....UJUJ,a...O::'-'.....UJUJI~~'-'_UJ~, , , ,
+ ------+ -..-----.... -------.... --------+ ------+ ------+ -------+ -------+ -----------+ --..----+ ------+
" , , , " """"
" 'e-, =, " CO," I
" '= I ,,~, " '-"""
' ,.....= ,- e-, , " I",
1 '== '=, , 'I '"
' = ,~- 'Ln , ....., " ..... , , ,
' = '=<.n tn , = ...... 1 = ~ I = '= '= = 0:: , , ,
,-= , -<.n UJ , .. 0::_ I , , '= '"
:~~: ~~~: ~~.=: =~ : ",,=: ""Ln: 0== ~~:E: : : :
,-= , a...'-'== 1 a...""<.nLn , a..."".= I a...mmo-> , a...O->.....Ln ,~.....u:lu:l ~~."" , , ,
UJ 1 Q::UJ , '0:: , I " , , _. , '''''u:l. , '''''e--. , I e--e-- . , u:l:E: . , , ,
..J''-'..J , ""=..J~ , ""UJ:E::"" , ""UJ=..... , ~ = , "" 0 , "" = ~ ~ , I ,
0:: , cn '==- I =..... .. '=- '= . ... , =.... , =.. _. = .~.. , , I
='UJ '===cn, ==c-= , ==== , =UJUJ= , =UJUJ= 'OUJUJ= =UJ~= , , ,
= , = 1 ,o::~..... , '=.t- , , =...... , '............... , ,............... 1 , .....0--....... , ..... ...... I , I
~, '~..J = I ""~.....= 1 =0::.....= 1 ~o::o::= , .....0::0::= 1 =0::0::= e--=== , , ,
<Xl, '=-:x=, =....= , -....= , __....= , .........= 'u:l....= ,...,_._.= I , ,
..J, 'u:l=<.n-, u:lO::=UJ , u:lO::=UJ , e--o::=UJ , e-o::=UJ 'e-o::=UJ u:lO::=~ , 1 ,
=, '=O::'-'..J' =............J , =............J , =............J , =............J ,=............J =............J , , ,
+ ---.... ------+ ------+ ------+ ---------+ ------+ ------.... ------+ ------+ ------.... -------....
' '''''e- '''''e- ,== ,~O-> ,.....,..., ,==,..., ,e--=~, , I. I
1 'co.....= '=.....0 ,.....~= '-~e-- I.....u:l lu:l.....,..., '1")__"'" I , ,
' ,~,...,..... -'u:l,...,..... ~,u:l""o -,e-.....= -,e-..... ~,e-.......... ~,~....._ _, 1 , ,
' UJ ,= co= '= =..... 1 = =..... ,=,...,..... 1 0 ..... '= .....0--- 'C> _....., , , ,
>-,..... , ==....., ='-' -, =,-, "'" "",-,,...,, '-'.."., .....L> Ln' .....L> u:l' , , ,
.....,= , = "'" CC "'" = "'" =~, = "'" = "'" =~, I I ,
=,= 'UJ 0:: 'UJ O::UJ 'UJ O::UJ 'UJ O::UJ 'UJ O::UJ 'UJ O::UJ ,~ O::UJ , I , ,
=,0:: ,..... ..J '..... .......... ,..... .......... '..... _..... ,..... .......... 't- .......... ,..... .......... , , , ,
=, I =.."-a..._, =...-==-, =..-.==-, =-...==-, =...-==_, =_...==_, =:>..__==_, , I ,
'-'I ,='-'=== ,='-'==..... ,='-'==_ ,='-'==..... 1='-'==_ ,='-'==..... ,='-'==..... , , 1 ,
' 1 ""'--""'0:: I ""'.....-~<.n ,O::.....-'-'tn 'O::--~<.n ''''''.....-'-'<.n ''''''.....-'-'<.n ''''''~-'-'<.n ,__..____ , _________ I ______ 1
<.n
.....
=
UJ
=
=
=
L>
....
""
<0
0..
0::
UJ
a...
~ UJ
0" a...
m ..J
..... =
, L>
Ln
=
,
= >--
..... '-'
0::
'" .....
..... <.n
<0
= <=>
I
If) I
I
I
I
I
0.. I
en I
'" I
Cl... I
I
I
,
(J) I
>- I
:z: I
u.J I
=-= I
%: I
= I
'-' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
, I I I
-+- -+ -+ -+ -------+
I I ('.I I C'lC',ICX) I
I f ..-. , c-C'-I....--.t f
f l.LJ l.1.J I <::) I r-ltr)_.. I
'(.J J--I _I I
I:Z: U.J f C> I C'-("o..IC> I
I <J:C)-J I ,....., I o;:)C)-.:t' I
I -.Jt--O- . M I C>"'CI'"CO I
.0:: 2::1 I I
I CQI C) I C) I ....-t(X)<:::> I
I <......J I ,....., , (">.,I I
I t I f
+-+-+-+-----+
I I I Ln I LnLD~Ln<::> I
I I I e- I UlCJ:)('.Jc- t
I I CO I ....., f (".1.......,1:-,....., f
I f O"l I - I f
I I I I 1.O I ,....,...............LD f
. I C- I C- I U'CD~C- I
I I (7l I '-0 '''''''r'''''')(T'Il.D .
I . (T'I I - I f
I I....... , ,....., I ('..I"""" I
tit I I
I I I I I
I , I I I
.... +-+--+-----+
, (..(') I I l.D I r::--c-('.,fLOC) t
I ::z: I I <::> f U"")CDl.DC) I
1c:;)'t-r........'Lr1........,...,......... I
t I (Tl t _ I I
I t-- I I I t"- I ~Ll"1C'-c- I
I a: f LD I en f CD""CDCJ"'l I
I (,J f (7l I ~ I ,....,0""I.........'"'fI::!'" I
:~:~:,...;: ("~......,:
I --.I I I I I
I a:::: I I I I
I I I I I
+ +-+-+------+
I I I Ln I l.O.........CDLnc:> I
I , I 1:'- I C:>C:>\.CJC- I
I I I..D I ......-4 I 0::>.......('.1........ I
I I O"l I - f I
I a:::: I I I Ln I O""l('.o.l"""t.n I
I a: I Ln I C"'..J I Lr1,.....,,.....,c-.... ,
I UJ I en I ,...., I ('.IO"l.......,......., I
: >-: ~:,....-.: ("-.I,.....,:
I . I I I
I I I f I
I I fit
..... ..... -+ -+ ------+
, I I l.D I O"1('..1lr)l.D<::> I
I I I r:- I r:-"-OfV")c- t
I 1lJ"")1c:>ILD........("'...I<::) I
,--,,(TIt -I ,
o:J I CC I I I I:"- r r"""7Mc:>c- f
0-' I (.j I ~ I 0--. I .........fV")U")0",\ I
I I (f) I (7l I __-f I ('.I(Tl<::)........ ,
~ r:-- I , (T1 I I I
ct: 01 I LL. I .......... , ,....-, I ____,....-, .
E: a:::: CTI' I I I J
WU L~ ~ I 1 I I I
I-- ~- I 1 1 I I
(J"') O!(f) + +-+__+_______+
~ ~~ , , Ir~'~~~~C',
~ ~ I~I f~t~~~~ I
::z: -- =' 1 UJ I """" I a::r t <:::) c- ~ OJ ,
>- c:)- -- , ..-. I en I -, I
~ -Q~l~f f r-f~~~_ ,
~ ~~~I~I~'-I~~~_ I
~ ~> , ....., , cr'l I ("->..I, <::)........("'-.,l t
:z: =:II-=: 'C::J'O"'lI 1 ,
c::) Ct:::- .Q::::;._',....,I _('.I,....., I
(.J t--- I 0- , I I I
UJ U') I I I I ,
~ ~ ,......, I r I' f
C:) 0"'+ +-+_+_____+
(,...) I f I I C> , C"-<:::),......,c:::><::> I
('.II I 1("".....t"-_,....,C'4 ,
en f I""'" I In f ("'..J "Q'" COtr) ,
en I I cr'l I _ I I
........ 1 I' I t.D f lr)~~....o I
1 1 C'"-.J 1 .....-4 1 CXJC)('.I..-t I
I 'cn'-I___I"""')t.D......'
: : ~ : ,....,: ........-.,...., :
I 1 I 1 I
I I 1 1 I
I , 1 1 1
+-+-+-+-----+
I , lD I l.O........Ol I
f --.J I ...-II I Lr)....-t"q" ,
I CI:W-=:' f .-4 , O"llr)t,.,O I
t Z:Z:UJ I - J ,
, C::J-O:::: 1 ~ I Q:)C-t- ,
1 -.:=t-, u"') 1 ~(X')..-t 1
I 1--2';.=:l , ,....., 1 lr>COCT'l ,
I -.=:lC2f I -, I
I ~l.L..~ I C> I C""-J"IItTC'J ,
,~ a::: 1 U") I _~ I
I <J: I I 1
+ ---+ --+ -----+
1 , LJ"") I CT"Ir-,JFV) ,
I(f) ICTl'........If')("".... I
I=:;J(D 1Lr'Jllno:'J('.I ,
I C):z:: , _ I ,
I I ....... 1 cn...-llC> I
f~~ '~I~U'")~ I
f UJ:Z: 1 t- I ("o..I(X)l.D 1
I 0::::::1 1 _ 1 I
'0-l..L.... 'o::J, (".,f.........~ I
, I' .
1 f f I
..... ------+ -+ -.------+
, 1 I ,
I I ........ , lrJ~('"..J ,
f ~ I _ I t"--t...DC- I
'l.J..J 'C:-I~."""Q:l f
, r- , -. I ,
'0:....- 'U"), O:>OlC- 1
I:.E:"Ul I CTI I cnr0V) I
I-C:) ,c;::,.,C-C-lrl I
'1--<.....,) I - I f
I t.n 1 cn I ~LOr-- I
I LLI 1 lJ") I _.....-.. I
I " ,
I I I .
I I I f
I 1 I I
+ ---+ -+ -------+
, I LLJ ::'=1 :z; :z: (..!) ,
1 I O_'ClC:>:Z: ,
I I ct:::t:..J--1
, I I ,~:::z:
I I cr:-
, :z: '(f) UJ <.J a:
1 c;. I --' -.J C) :F-:
I --:r.: . c:c cr:: -JUJ
f ...- f-- I I-- t-- --10::::
I n..~ f C) C) <T.:
1 --- :z: 1"-- 1-.... t--
LlJ ,rJ:::UJ , --.J:Z:
_.J I ~-.J 1:>-....-- c:r::=::J
O::':'Ul I~- a:.: t--C.=I
a: . UJ 1::Z:: C) C::::>>::C
z:: , ,:::::) I =:) 0_ I-- <C
LU 1 r C:J LLI
CXl 1 1 'L.)I I a:.:
_.J , I'
a: 1 'I
+---+*+* ....
I '''' I .. I
, 1'* 1'* 1
I 1'* I '* I
1 l.LJ , '* '" I
>-,1-- '*'* ,
....- I:::::) , '* . * r
:2:1c::.::J 1*1* I
=:JIO:::: 1*.* I
C:;), 1'* I '* ,
c..J, , * I'" I
, " I
CO<
LU
">I CL.
LU
0' CL.
~~ .-'
::>
'. <-'
If)
=
'.
3 .-
<-'
'" co<
.-
..... <n
'"
c"" no
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
Robert Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~~
March 3, 1993
Appropriation - Langford Roads
Attached is the appropriation form you requested for the road
provements in Langford subdivision.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
S!:1(
':/\tl3dnS:lO owos
~
€661 ., 1A.Ird" '-I '
i I . - (, UVll .. i; i"
LGn fIJ n @ t@Jj
eel n.!TY OF f\ "
H~,q 4 1993
~;
to
[;(~"_"_~'U ~ i /: Ci~'i~lC~C
~I.J) ,. ~.J .......,. ._--J!v~ ') - "iL_- -'::'-'-S
__ _J () _.iL"\ ..;;...-- '-"
County of Albemarle
00
~~ : _O'9~ ~ m!
)~.~' I
,
AGENDA
Langfor
Subdivision Roads
March 3, 1993
.
13 - iJ3u:)-13
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ACTION:-----1L-
INFORMATION:
the
state
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes (2)
STAFF C
Messrs.
Brandenburger, Ms. Higgins
REVIEWED BY :-~'-2;~
BACK ROUND: In response to a petition by the Langford Farms Homeowners Association the
Boar requested staff provide additional information on the process followed in getting
two L ngford Farms subdivision roads brought into the state secondary road system. The
two oads are Montgomery Lane and Pippin Lane. At the December 2,1992 Board meeting
staf had originally requested the Board appropriate $22,000 for the necessary road
repa'rs of which $10,000 was provided from the developer's road bond and the remaining
$12,000 from County funds. Board action was to appropriate the $22,000 with the
cond' ion the Homeowners contribute SO percent of the additional cost, i.e. $6,000, and
with the understanding the County Attorney would endeavor to first recover the
additional $12,000 from the developer. The County Attorney determined there was no
recou se with the developer and thus the County Engineer notified the Homeowners of the
requi ement for them to provide SO percent of the additional cost.
Summary of events - The roads were constructed approximately 12 years ago
nded. Bonds were renewed annually. Two of the four roads were not eligible to
ught into the state system until 1989 for Montgomery Lane and 1990 for Pippin
The requirement for three dwellings, which was beyond the control of the
per, was the controlling factor for Montgomery Lane. Pippin Lane was held up
g resolution of responsibility for bonding a central well system that was located
road right of way. Between Fall 1989 and October 1991 the staff's efforts were
ed to have all required work completed by the developer even though the developer
funct in 1986. The process of negotiation with the developer and the bonding
y was reaching fruition until a site visit by VDOT and County staff on November
91 determined vegetation had encroached into the road reducing the width of the
ed 2 feet. The developer was unwilling to complete this rework and the County
proceed with completing the work with funds received from the bond. The bond
en called and funds were received in October 1991. Between October 1991 and the
riation request in December 1992 staff was consolidating other small projects in
ort to seek a favorable bid for construction in the spring of 1992. Costs on
mery and Pippin Lanes exceeded the funds from the called bond by $12,000.
veloper would not complete the necessary work. In retrospect, the bond could
een called as early as 1990 but staff continued to work with the developer as
as been our policy and practice. This would not have prevented the current
ion but would have resolved it sooner.
ggins recognized the problems with our prior road inspection and bonding process
er a year ago undertook a more aggressive approach to get roads completed and
t into the state system. These Langford Farm roads are two of the oldest roads
not accepted.
In s mrnary, the
the eveloper.
full fund this
completion.
RECO
Subdivision Roads
County Attorney reaffirmed his opinion the County has no recourse with
At issue is the additional $12,000 required. If the Board decides to
project, the funding is available from an existing CIP project nearing
ATIOR: Request the Board appropriate the full $22,000.
93.0 1
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920058
TYPE F APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER X
NEW
FUND
YES
NO
x
ADVER ISEMENT REQUIRED ?
CAPITAL
E OF APPROPRIATION:
EMENTS TO ROADS IN LANGFORD SUBDIVISION.
PENDITURE
COST ENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900041000950096 LANGFORD ROADS $22,000.00
1900041020950036 BERKMAR DRIVE (12,000.00)
1100 93010930004
GEN'L FUND-TRANSFER TO CIP
10,000.00
TOTAL
$20,000.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2900 51000512004 CIP-TRANSFER FROM GEN'L FUND $10,000.00
2100 51000510105 GEN'L FUND RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE 10,000.00
TOTAL
$20,000.00
*******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
~L;.../9 ~~L--
;:;1'/ fl. it/' f7a-7
,:]'-3-7.7
$- :/- - ,#3
BO
OF SUPERVISORS
r
f:)~ST.~~r~ '~,';T:.'
ON -") - .~) -c r~~)
-.):,,'----,,- --'- ""'-"
LANGFORD FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
3580 Montgomery Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Mar h 3, 1993
Mr. David Bowerman, Chairman
Albe arle County Board of Supervisors
401 clntire Road
Char ottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Bowerman:
On behalf of the Langford Farms Homeowners Association, Inc., and the
fami ies in our neighborhood, I want to thank you for your vote in support of
our etition on March 3rd.
Ve felt, of course, that our position was a reasonable and proper one, but,
we a so know that life is not always fair. This time fairness prevailed.
Ve thank you for your understanding and support.
, .
Very trU~lJ)r
J. Smith
ent, LFHA
cc:
Board
00
:: 8B ~ ill
1M
BOARD OF SUPeRVISORS
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Bob Brandenbu~~er, Assistant County Executive
Jo Higgins, ~ctor of Engineering
26 February 1993
Langford Farms / Montgomery and Pippin Lane
have reviewed the petition from the Langford Farms Homeowners
ssociation. There are several basic facts that I would suggest
he Board reconsider.
The significant cost factor associated with Montgomery Lane
is the road width. These roads were constructed
approximately 12 years ago. Since there were few residences
for many of those years, the road received little or no use
for an extended period of time. As a result, the vegetation
along the shoulder gradually encroached into the stone
uniformly along the length of this road. This was so
gradual that it was not noticed in small increments. At the
time we were to identify a list of deficiencies to be
completed prior to final road acceptance, an actual
measurement of the surface width was done. The exposed
surface was too narrow by 2 feet. By digging along the
edge, it was apparent that the integrity of the stone was
destroyed along the edge. Usually, this is not the case.
Usually, the requirement to have a stable (grassy) shoulder
is difficult to attain due to normal use where cars travel
the edge or pull off onto the shoulder. While the road did
not meet the occupancy requirement the road was not eligible
to be accepted by VDOT, the Developer had no control over
the property owners schedule to purchase and construct a new
home.
2. The central well to serve the residents is located in the
Pippin Lane road right-of-way. As a requirement to accept
this road, VDOT required certain work to be done and a bond
be posted. When the occupancy requirement was met for
Pippin Lane, there were a couple of years where the
Developer did not post the bond but contended it was the
responsibility of the Homeowners Association. The
Homeowners Association did finally accomplish the work and
T ~
MEMO RE: Langford Farms I Montgomery and Pippin Lane
26 February 1993
Page Two
post the bond in 1990. The Developer contended he had no
control over the Homeowners Association meeting this
requirement.
3. The Homeowners Association has taken issue with the bond not
being increased in 1990. A bond estimate was done in 1990
which reflected a total cost of $14,161. (This estimate
did not include the 2FT additional surface width.) At the
time a bond comes up for renewal, as a condition of renewal
we can require the bond be increased. Should the Developer
not agree to the increase, the bond is then called. In this
case, the Developer was not in agreement with any increase.
Since the bond was not called, it automatically renewed at
$10,000. The consequences which is to call the bond would
have resulted in the County holding only the amount of the
existing bond which was $10,000. Therefore, the only
"error" may have been not having called the bond sooner. To
call a bond shifts the responsibility to complete the road
work and paperwork to the County staff. It is and always
has been the policy to make every effort to support, assist,
and if required to force the Developer to fulfill every
requirement for road acceptance. Otherwise, the County
staff would be required to bid numerous road projects each
year.
t the time this issue was placed before the Board, I had
equested the full amount of $22,000 be appropriated to
ccomplish the work. In this case, the age of the road
ontributed significantly to the current situation. This was
ot in anyone's control. The County staff could have enforced
ore rigidly and brought this issue to a head earlier.
egardless, the bid prices on road work have been lower in the
ast year than for the three to five previous years.
e are currently holding bids that are good until the end of
arch. If this work is not completed within that time frame,
here may be additional cost. The full $12,000 required to
omplete this work can be appropriated from an existing
ngineering Department project nearing completion.
HI
\
GEORGE R. T.JOHN
COUNTY ATT RNEY
January 13, 1993
,.:~
, } . , ' ',: 'I.'~l
\:. I - J
.. .,.,./'7
'\ . "Y
,~. . ""'L,,I
'--:/: 'll.~'\"'\\>'
.... ~. ~~ ....
JAMES M. BOWLING, IV
OfPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney
416 Park Street
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901
Telephone 296-7138
Jo Higgins
Co nty Engineer
Al emarle County
40 McIntire Road
Ch rlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Langford Subdivision
Jo:
I have ascertained that not only does Langford Farms, Inc.,
longer own any property in the County, but that the
poration itself has been defunct since 1986. That is, it has
existed, and therefore has had no assets, since that year.
Because the corporation alone was the sole principal on the
d, and was solely responsible for fulfillment of the
division requirements, I do not believe we can prevail in
empting to hold the individuals responsible. Of course, the
ety has been discharged by the payment of bond proceeds, and
refore it is my opinion that it will be futile to attempt to
apture any of the necessary funds for these roads, from the
eloper, any individuals associated with the developer, or the ~
ety.
In other words, the only source of these funds is the
eowners association, the County, or some combination thereof.
Sincerely yours,
~
George R. st. John
County Attorney
GR tJltlh
,-
.
.
. I,
.
:,
, .
LANGFORD FARMS HOMEOVNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
February 17, 1993
PETITION
TO THE
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FOR RELIEF FROM AN UNFAIR "ROAD TAX"
Ve, the undersigned residents of Langford Farms and members of the Langford
Far~s Homeowners Association, Inc., hereby petition the Albemarle County Board
of Dupervisors to fully fund the costs of such road improvements as may be
nec ssary to bring two streets in our subdivision, Montgomery Lane (0.2 mile)
and Pippin Lane (0.1 mile) into the state's secondary road system.
By letter of February 2, 1993, County Engineering Director Jo Higgins
adv sed Langford residents that it would cost an estimated $22,000 to make the
req\ ired improvements. Only $10,000 is available from the proceeds of a bond
def ult provided by the subdivision's developers. According to Ms. Higgins,
COUIty policy provides for 50-50 cost sharing: Albemarle will pay $6,000 and
res'dents must pay the remaining $6,000. An additional letter provided Langford
HomEowners from County Attorney St. John to Director Higgins stated that there
is ro chance of recovering additional monies from the developers.
Langford Farms residents object to this proposal and suggest that the
Courty should assume responsibility for all of the costs for reasons stated
belo~:
o Virtually everyone who purchased a lot or home in Langford did so after
ascertaining that roads had been constructed to state standards and had
either been taken into the state's secondary road system or were secured
by surety bonds obtained by the subdivision's developers. Thus,
financial responsibility for the road system was clearly established to
.
.
. ~
.
,
be that of the state and the subdivision's developers. Property owners
bought and built without fear of contingent liability for road
maintenance costs.
o County staff was negligent in the performance of its duties and
responsibilities in this matter and that negligence is the sole cause of
an escalation in costs necessary to complete the road work. It is not
reasonable for the county to now seek to pass on part of these costs to
Langford Homeowners. The county Engineering Department asked LFHA to
make certain repairs for which it was responsible (water lines are in
highway right-of-way and certain valves had to be replaced and asphalt
patching performed to produce a smooth surface) in the spring of 1990.
That work was performed in May 1990. After that, Langford Homeowners
expected the remainder of the work to be performed promptly. Almost
three years later, we are still waiting.
o The primary error in this succession of errors was the failure of county
staff to require the subdivision's developers to increase the amount of
the surety bond to keep pace with escalating improvement costs. Vhen
the county staff knew that the face amount of the bond they held was
insufficient to cover present costs (November 1990), and even as they
advised the LFHA, Inc. president that the face amount of the bond would
be increased, they failed to do so. The economic consequences of that
failure have been compounded in the months since then, and the county
now seeks to have Langford Homeowners pay for that mistake.
o LFHA, Inc. does not accept the view of County Attorney St. John that the
subdivision's developers are beyond reach for these monies, Despite the
demise of Langford Farms, Incorporated, as a corporate entity in 1986,
the developers, as individuals, continued to do business on this issue
I
( ... "
. '.
. with county staff, VDOT' engineers, and an insurance company, obtaining
bonding, negotiating over costs and requirements, and even sending
employees to clear and grub the right-of-way and pull ditches next to
the subject streets. These actions continued through the fall of 1992
at which time they ceased negotiations and delivered to the county a
$10,000 cashiers check for the face amount of the bond. These failures
to negotiate a good faith solution to the problem should not now be
passed on to Langford Homeowners in the form of an unwarranted "road
tax." It is the contention of LFHA that the continued actions and
.
negotiations by the developers constituted a voluntary waiver of the
protection offered by a "corporate veil."
o A full chronology of events related to this issue (attached) reveal a
pattern of procrastination, duplicity, and error related to this problem
on the part of both the county staff and the developers for which
Langford Homeowners should bear no responsibility.
Res~ectfully submitted,
Joslph Smith, President LFBA, Inc.
Jam e Gibson, Vice President LFBA, Inc.
Betl Lipper, Secretary, LFBA, Inc.
Lar]~ Shifflett, Treasurer, LFBA, Inc.
.
DenJis Stokes, Board Member, LFBA, Inc.
.
.
.
"
,
. .
HOMEOVNERS
~r
.
HOHEO\lNERS
1./ ~ - I{tv( ti,
~'t1t\~ C-\ ~N\Ql;~
1)~tj ~
J)~~Q/ cfzB:~
~uJ~
:wt~) 4/Jt#>u'
L ,(_- . j1.
1[uD ~ ~-:U7-D.
.~t://
.
eo
.
- CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS -
EFFORTS BY LFHA, INC. TO HAVE IMPROVEMENTS HADE TO PIPPIN
AND MONTGOMERY LANES IN LANGFORD FARMS SUBDIVISION
o Fe 11 - 1989
Montgomery Lane meets state mInImum for
inclusion in state secondary road system
when the third home on the road is
occupied.
o Fe 11 - 1989
LFHA, Inc. is advised that "punch list"
has been prepared by VDOT and county
engineering staff for necessary
improvements to Pippin and Montgomery
Lanes. LFHA must secure bond for water
lines under the roadways and correct
maintenance problems at valve boxes.
o 2( November 1989
o
LFHA submits Land Use Permit for
Langford water system to VDOT and files
for three year surety bond with Cabell
Insurance.
2l November 1989
Subdivision developers obtain new
$10,000 surety bond for one year.
lC March 1990
~. Ferguson (of LFHA) meets Glenn
Caudell of Albemarle County Engineering
to inspect required maintenance of water
system valve boxes on Montgomery and
Pippin.
o 0 May 1990
~, Ferguson writes to Peter Parsons of
county staff to advise of completed road
work.
o lE July 1990
~. Ferguson calls Glenn Caudell of
county staff to ask about progress to
finish road work.
o 2E September 1990
Letter from ~. Ferguson to G. Caudell of
county staff requesting action on the
roads.
o 3( September 1990
~, Ferguson calls G, Caudell of
county staff, Caudell advises:
-developer's bond has been called,
-letter to U.S,F&G from Jo Higgins dated
9/23/90,
-work will commence after funds received
from bonding company,
T
o 3b September 1990
Joe Smith (of LFHA) calls Hoyt Alford of
county staff. Alford advises:
.
-developers still expected to complete
"'ork.
-no mention made of bond being called.
o 05 November 1990
v. Ferguson calls G. Caudell of
county staff. Caudell advises:
-staff recently photographed and
revie"'ed the t",o streets to update
cost estimates for repair.
-current bond $10,000. Developers ",ill
be required to increase bond to
$14,000 (ne", cost estimate).
-county sent certified letter to
developers advising that when old bond
expires (11-26-90) permission to renew
",ill be contingent upon increase to
$14,000.
o 1( June 1991
Letter from V. Ferguson to G, Caudell of
county staff requesting action on the
roads.
o O~ July 1991
V. Ferguson calls G. Caudell of
county staff. Is told that developers
have been told that they must complete
work by end of August 1991.
.
o 1 August 1991
V. Ferguson calls G. Caudell of
county staff. Is told that letter has
gone to developers saying demand has
been made to call the bond. Money
available for "'ork in 30-60 days.
o loG August 1991
Memo from V. Ferguson to LFHA Board and
Montgomery and Pippin families, Memo
says county has advised that developers
have ignored requests to perform work.
On August 1, 1991 county wrote
developers to call the bond.
o Spring 1992
V. Ferguson calls Hoyt Alford of county
staff. Alford advises:
.
-developers' bond was called,
-developers delivered $10,000 check to
county,
-developers continue to negotiate with
Albemarle and VDOT over work
requirements,
-construction to start May 1992 if
county does the "'ark.
.
.
, ,
.
T
o 30 July 1992
V, Ferguson calls H, Alford of county
staff. Alford has left county
employment. Spoke with Mr, Jack Kelsey.
Kelsey suggests contacting Jo Higgins
and/or Robert Tucker.
P 03 August 1992
Memo from V. Ferguson to Montgomery Lane
families. Memo reports H. Alford no
longer works for county; work again
delayed, Don't know how much longer it
will be.
P 01 September 1992
Letter from V. Ferguson to County
Executive Robert Tucker,
P 30 September 1992
Letter from R, Tucker to V. Ferguson,
County plans to complete these projects
by December 1, 1992.
o 13 January 1993
Letter from County Attorney G. St. John
to Jo Higgins advising that developer's
corporate entity, Langford Farms, Inc.,
defunct since 1986. No assets. No
claim against them as individuals.
o 02 February 1993
Letter from Jo Higgins to Joe Smith,
president of LFHA, requesting $6,000
from LFHA to provide 50% of $12,000
deficit.
17 February 1993
Langford Homeowners petition Albemarle
County Board of Supervisors for relief
from unfair "road tax."
..
.
~
.
November 21, 1989
TO: LFHA Directors
FROM: Vayne Ferguson
Attached you will find evidence of progress being made on several
fronts.
1. My letter to Vayne Pullen of Cabell Insurance is self explanatory.
he Land Use Permit Application has been filed with VDOT. Cabell has
indicated that they will issue the bond. I will let you know as things
evelop. Please note that they inquired about whether or not we carry
liability insurance. Since we operate the water system and have property
(the well-house) where some injury might occur we probably should acquire
insurance. I will discuss this with Mac Peatross for his expert opinion.
2. I also attach the plan Dave Vyant gave me concerning some
lantings to beautify our frontage road entrance areas. It seems to be a
easonable and low cost start at what we want. Any ideas about how to
roceed now? Jamie, could you give us some help with this? I have asked a
ellow at work to give me some ideas and estimated costs for a sign. He
ill have something for us to look at in a week or two.
Ve may need a meeting soon to discuss some of these things. I will
et you know. Ve also need to make plans for our annual meeting.
.
LANGFORD FARMS
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Post Office Box 5776
Charlottesville. Virginia 22905
Novem~er 20, 1989
Mr. V~yne Pullen
Cabel Insurance Associates
1228 ~edars Court
Charlpttesville, Virginia 22901
Dear Wayne:
rhank you for your recent phone call regarding a surety bond for the
Langfprd Farms Homeowners Association, Inc. community water system. I
certa nly appreciate your helpful and cooperative attitude.
.
Per your request I enclose the following:
) copies of LFHA, Inc. tax returns for the past two years,
) a current LFHA, Inc. financial statement, and
) a copy of our VDOT Land Use Permit application filed with the local
residency office.
'he Land Use Permit application was hand delivered to Mr. Jeff Echols
of th VDOT on November 13.
am also enclosing, with this letter, four copies of the Form MP-20
which, I understand from Mr. Echols, is to be filled in by the insurance
compaIY. I have already signed the forms where, it appears to me, my
signa ure is needed. If I have erred on this please let me know.
Js discussed in our telephone conversation, we would be pleased to pay
the bend premium for a three year period. Please bill us at the above
addre~s for the premium due and we will get a check to you immediately.
I am also discussing the need for liability insurance with our Board of
Directors and will get back to you shortly regarding our requirements in
that area.
~ith best personal regards, I am
~ truly ;'~9S' _
Yayne)~. Ferguso
Presid~nt, LFHA, Inc.
. cc: M~mbers; LFHA, Inc. Board
Mr. Jeff Echols, VDOT Charlottesville Residency
z
::;
.
.
.
165 Langford Place
Charlottesville, VA 22901
ay 2, 1990
. Peter Parsons
unty of Albemarle
D partment of Engineering
C unty Office Building
4 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Parsons:
Pursuant to my meeting of March 19, 1990 with Mr. Glen Caudill of your
aff, the Langford Farms Homeowners Association, Inc. has had the valve
xes at the intersections of Pippin Lane and Langford Place, and Montgomery
ne and Langford Place, repaired and made flush with the road surface with
a phalt plant mix.
I trust that this work discharges our responsibility to the county and
Virginia Department of Transportation for these necessary repairs.
Residents of both Pippin and Montgomery look forward to Mr. Carter's
mpletion of the necessary repair work on these roads and the inclusion of
e roads into the state's secondary system.
Mr. Jeff Echols, VDOT Residency Office
LFHA Directors
3
.
.
.
LANGFORD FARMS HOMEOVNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
165 Langford Place
Charlottesville, VA 22901
S ptember 26, 1990
M . Glenn Caudell
E gineering Department
C unty of Albemarle
4 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, VA 22901
ar Glenn:
I am writing at the urging of residents of Langford Farms who reside on
ppin and Montgomery Lanes. Neither of these streets has been officially
ken in to the state secondary roads system and homeowners there are quite
ger for action to be taken which would bring those roads up to state
andards and include them in the state system.
As you know, developer Ron Carter got a letter from the County last
w'nter (I believe) which contained a punch list of items to be fixed or
c rrected in order for the standards to be met. Several of those items
i volved things for which the Langford Farms Homeowners Association was
r sponsible since they concerned broken valve boxes for the community water
s stem. As you will recall, I met you at Langford on March 19, 1990 to
d'scuss your specific requirements of the Homeowners Association. Vhile we
w re there Ron Carter was also there with someone from (I believe) A. G.
D"llard Paving discussing the same punch list items. Langford Farms
H meowners Association promptly took action on our required work and you
w re advised of that in writing. To date nothing has happened regarding the
w rk for which Mr. Carter was responsible.
It has now been almost a year since the third home on Montgomery Lane
b came occupied and the minimum requirement for inclusion in the state
s stem was met. Meanwhile, that road has become more and more of a problem;
b oken-up, potholed, unsightly. Residents understood last fall, when winter
w s approaching, that very little time was available to fix the road. But
no , people have become less understanding.
~
.
.
.
Mr Glenn Caudell
Se tember 26, 1990
Pa e 2
Ve have been advised that the performance bond on the Langford roads is
du to expire in late November. Vith all due respect, we urge the County,
an the VDOT, to mandate the required improvements to the subject roads
im ediately.
Your consideration of this request will be appreciated. I would
ap reciate the courtesy of a reply.
Ve y truly yours,
Va ne S. Ferguson
Pr sident, LFHA, Inc.
cc
Mr. Jeff Echols, VDOT
Mr. Vayne Pullen, Cabell Insurance
L.F.H.A. Board
~
.
.
.
Icy9()
/--.
." JkJ-
. L
Sf"6_C
, ~jl 30
I {)
l . ~f!k4, vtI~
I
J ~_d /k'-7P b tI>-_P
._ _.t-c_ t1o=f_ {Ll~^ N J_!
. d,JI-f~,'! 2J,
d.,.-:).
()
I {," /~v
l-r-.J
fA--
(~~- r&.t.l ~ f
(;..-,...-_ J) ::..., (. !J"./-<'V-\
/ I /
/l.-:> ;, "-~
l ('-<-.c-
, 1" /J
.,:~J(<~'
r'1~
//-L -
~ un.II
(:) I
iI.cFlt
, ....,1")".... ,<-_;:? rU l L~~;;) ~,/C'" . ,
__~J__kV ~-;?_u_~~-en __ a:~p'[ t I _ __ __~_____ ~~__ -f.d !r1_l-
-. -- -- -- JLiL --usJ~~~~--1-- \~ L ~J ~ _ __ __ _.__
-i ~_-4.twl__ ML _-1-~_l:f _ IL!--- -.:-L-~~-P-/~~~~~lanb."'SL~~
(./
: /, "'-- h< f /V"c - . IL. t.:-.'!l:l "1-<-'/ tT'. I--:- J? ; [h<- -?- ~ ,A.- ~~~c--
:~/~--- bh-.R7 ~~ ~- ~ ~ ~I ;'
; C-/'r~!.v" ~--{J -~ ~j< /. iv"J r .!-l?"-.-.<-~~) ~_,v cL
./v---.-I..---- Ih-__>,.:i~~ ,,,,[._/.-<";;>/1 (:.......))-<-__:...'2_ 1.-"'/ .r ~c:"~
GtF'" ;~
)/7/L
M... ~II
/
I L'-~ 1-..-~r
. F '
r.u_ll .-
i
I
, /,J.,_'_ .;,. j
90'
9/-.
.s,..... c ri
. /t<. ;/",.// r:..i!".p .1 (:'d--'- c?
/' . -'
/ )
! /.' /; /)7 H
~-~ (-.';::;o' /, --'~ /.~.."..~ , 1."
;/ -: / .I ',IL_
. '~/I::''...--t: "-<--l - .-
.f/I.!,)
,
/.'/..1
...:-~
L,I
(;// I' .,
,,,c,o' , '-_
;:.~
-~j~..- /
. /1
f> .,- I
/ h. J. ~J,>;. / F- .
/ . /J
/ L/
-t, r/ I'I;? .- / . /
--r (j. '/""" ,/,'.-/'.
, pi' - 7
_~1,_ ._, .,.,'i.. _, ./."./ )~"""vi) 5---"
) / .
, . 1
71.-- ('~ 1</.-. /v-
/
I, . f"" ';.
I '
5f If
" . 1/
. ,c........j/
,,-,r t .
j
N"'/
/1. /
I-j I
}'.' ". __/ L',
/
f')
;/
1_ < I' J ~,
/.
7,-L do .
6
. ~~/~ "" ~YL-<s~L ,f ~- >) J9:70 WI Ii ~
c~ ,c:;:eiL ~ 6. 2-,;'--7 O-yl.
" ~ A;~ 07f1 ~7 ~,'~~
~L~ y--r-L.f /,~ {r--- -f ~J#
JI-.--P
,
O.A--' V.L.-
(jI ~ ~ d1- r~ -h.v., fl~ ;, !,O/Odt?;'
~ ~~ ! w~l /~ t ~ '-1" t
., /-J..L r~~J ,Of II~/ Ot?cJ -
.
~ :77 pJ ~ c....ft- ~ u-c:/.);J ~ /dJ
oJ, 2-) JVUO/7 L /1.-1- ~ ~ b~ ~~
~~ 2-, ,/99tJ ;' I1J L t.-jJ k ~~
-J, .A-R--~ /L ~ J' ILJ 7L "k-/ ~ j L
~ ~ 1;'1/040. LdZ.- r~ '? 0/ c-e);.;--f'
~ ~ oJ- Uk-~, ~f F ~- ~
'7 14- C.....J...' , >--, f;... .
J;..., W;J?;;~ U.LA- ~ I 7L. c/J~.
/
/
.
1
.
LANGFORD FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
165 Langford Place
Charlottesville, VA 22903
r. Glenn Caudell
ngineering Department
ounty of Albemarle
01 McIntire Road
harlottesville, VA 22901
.
Mr. Caudell:
I am again writing to you at the urging of residents of Langford Farms
o reside on Pippin and Montgomery Lanes. Neither of these streets has
en taken in to the state's secondary road system and homeowners there are
v ry eager for action to be taken which would bring those roads up to
acceptable standards. At present, Montgomery Lane in particular, is in
rrible condition. You will recall that I wrote to you on September 26,
90 with the same request, (copy enclosed) hoping that action could be
ken before the end of fall 1990. I received no reply to that letter, but,
a subsequent telephone conversation you advised that a decision had been
de to approve the developer's continuation of the road bond through
vember 1991.
The purpose of this letter is to remind you that the residents of
M ntgomery Lane remain quite eager to have their road repaired; they would
l'ke to have the work done before expiration of the current bond; under no
c'rcumstances do they want to see the bond renewed; they do not want to
e dure another winter break-up of the pavement.
Your attention to this matter will be sincerely appreciated, I would
a preciate a reply at your earliest convenience,
truly yours,
.
c: LFHA Board
8
2 f C / s- f3 { I
91 8~ /99/
Ce..J4 f c..-f,y
.
5/"L J ~. c~
~/~ O-yl /
o /7_ /J JJ / ILL ' '7 J?
~ {.ALtP":A.- ~ L r~ lJ:.r ~
7L ~ I ~ 11 I ~ ~~7
~~L-J: / L;h.../ (Jll'f/;' I~)
!Jj L L ~~ t<..e--- ~ I ~ 4<~<,
. I L ~7 S'.~rrt'~~ '-;''-7/~ / TL
~L.- h- ~~ ~ L_ R.r' fp-- ~
,L/--I/ -;L- AJ} I tZ._-j" {f, tJ M I
..e-yf-<~ z;~ -H.- '(7 ,
~ ,,!r
I 1[. .
.'; )
if.,.". ' , ')'
.J, ':'.<< ( r- 11, '. ' (
.
,
l. i. ( - f'" I
(L" ,( !
" f 1 JL." I. "I, ,
' j"
J~<. ~ ,.' J.
'> :: ' '~Co') h__.._____\ " .' . .' c .
r
9
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
ugust 14, 1991
LFHA Board Members, and
Residents of Pippin and Montgomery Lanes
Repair work necessary for Pippin and Montgomery Lanes to be
taken into state secondary road system
There is news to report on the matter of necessary repair work for
and Montgomery.
Ron Carter apparently ignored numerous requests from the county
gineering department to perform the required work. As a result, on August
the county wrote to Ron to advise him that demand had been made to Cabell
surance to call the bond issued by USF&G. I spoke to a representative of
bell and was told that they do not plan any further intervention; the
nding company will probably pay the county the $14,000 face amount of the
nd within 30 to 60 days. Meanwhile a local law firm will be asked to file
s it against Ron to recover USF&G's money.
I hope that things will move quickly now so that the work can be
before it gets cold.
/0
.
.
.
\
'7
.. ,/
5p~ <72-
~V.LAJ'~ L IvJIL
;.f,,;I u I/.-.--.;Y di,~: ~
rL ~<<4 b,-~ Yv~ ~.
II.- cJ~; j7~ C/~~ ~ f /0)"0" ~
?i-L, I'~ ~G<,4 ~ ~ ,ue~
7L
-.J~
~.LA.07 ~I-:.----
J. ~~/,z../~ ~ V})p!
~L&-I ~/~ ~ ~
~
Co/1 /~
J LI;~,
VPt:J}":" 1J....') __ r~ /~ ~ ~ ~~
A--/ h- ~ p~ 1 c-J~:
~) 5U~ ~-~ ,-I
t) Jvl~ f ~
2;r-.: L~ r ~,
) c:'.,ql ~ J 5 hLJ' , '-- A..-j ,~;'" ' f- C-F1L-,.-7
~ TL t./ ,,-f
/) ,4-1.7 ,L ~jJ<_. ~ 9~ I'L
~""'V~ ~ c~/"'" 1 ~L- h.~;.
~) .J'.,../.L ~ J,<jr /2. i ~,/~ ~~7 /....~ ,;... I-
rk/. Li----} 'Yi-~'
II
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
Au ust 3, 1992
TO: The Smith, Spence, and Collmus families
Vayne Ferguson
Necessary road work for Montgomery Lane to come into the state
secondary system
As you know, I was told several months ago that work should commence
August 1st on Montgomery Lane. My source of information was Mr. Hoyt
of the Albemarle County Engineering Department. At the end of last
wee , as August 1st approached, I called Mr. Alford to check on the status of
thi gs.
Unfortunately, I was told that Hoyt Alford no longer works for
marle; he left 3 to 4 weeks ago. I spoke to a Mr. Jack Kelsey. Mr.
ey said that they are aggressively recruiting to replace Alford, but that
departure has delayed a lot of things (including work on Montgomery Lane).
quired about whether things are advancing toward a beginning of the work
rdless of the personnel situation. I was told that they are planning to
age 3 or 4 such situations as ours into a single bid proposal and to award
all at one time. They do not know how long this might take.
I complained bitterly about this to Jack Kelsey (in fact, I was
ty nasty to him) and was essentially told that they are doing the best
can under the circumstances and if I didn't like it I could take my
laints to Ms. Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering, or Bob Tucker, County
utive.
Before I said anything more I wanted you all to know what is
ening.
I suggest that we all call Ms. Higgins (296-5861) and see if we can
get this thing moving.
Vay e
I~
?
.
.
.
\
September 1, 1992
165 Langford Place
Charlottesville, VA 22903
r. Robert Tucker
ounty Executive
ounty of Albemarle
01 McIntire Road
harlottesville, VA 22901
Mr. Tucker:
I am writing to request your assistance in the resolution of
matter that has troubled many of the residents of our little subdivision
several years now, The issue concerns the up-grading and paving of
of our subdivision streets (Montgomery Lane) so that it may be
'ncorporated into the state's secondary roads system.
What seems like so little a matter has, in fact, dragged on for
long time and many of our homeowners are beginning to conclude that
he County Engineering Department has mishandled the issue.
I attach some correspondence on this issue dating back to
eptember 1990. You will note from that letter that our homeowners
ssociation took action on problems under our control in March 1990.
addition to this correspondence, I have placed numerous telephone calls
o county staff in an attempt to get some action on this matter.
I am now writing to you because the people who live on Montgomery
not want to go through yet another winter with the road in its
present, deplorable, condition. In addition to the poor, and unsightly
condition of the road, its exclusion from the secondary roads system
kes it indligible for snow removal.
Several of us have recently been advised by county staff that we
expect the road work to be completed sometime this fall, We were told
at this job is being packaged with several other relatively small projects
go to bid and that a few final details remained to be worked out before
/3
.
.
.
~
the jobs were advertised, I hope this will be the case but we have
een disapPQinted before by forecasts issued by the Engineering
epartment,
Please advise me, at your earliest convenience so that I may
otify our most interested families, if we can expect this road work
o be completed before winter.
Very truly yours,
Wayne S. Ferguson
President, LFHA, Inc.
/~
~
.
.
.
.,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
FAX (804) 972-4060
September 30, 1992
W yne S. Ferguson, President
L ngford Farms Homeowners Association, Inc.
1 5 Langford Place
C arlottesville, Virginia 22901
D ar Mr. Ferguson:
I am writing in response to your letter of September 1st in which you requested
i formation on the status on the completion of one of your subdivision streets,
i.e. Montgomery Lane.
e information you received from our Engineering Department staff is correct.
ere are two streets in your subdivision scheduled for completion this fall,
ntgomery Lane and Pippin Lane. We are making every effort to complete these
ojects by December 1, 1992 but this will depend on the cost estimates we
ceive. Under state procurement laws, we may have to formally bid this work
ich could delay the completion of the work until January 1, 1992. I will know
e answer to this by October 20th.
appreciate the frustration with getting this type of work completed. It has
ays been the County's position to have the developer complete the roads for
ceptance into the state system. We still support this position but have
cently taken a firmer stance to ensure this work is completed within a
asonable timeframe. In the case of your roads, the road bonds have been called
d the County will contract for their completion.
you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or our Director of
ineering, Ms. Jo Higgins.
Sincerely,
RW ,Jr/dbm
92.165
~.
obert W. Tucker,
unty Executive
cc: Ms. Jo Higgins
I}"
--,~---,-:-,-
----
."..../ ~
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5861
2 February 1993
oe Smith
ord Farms Homeowners Association
Montgomery Lane
ottesville, VA 22903
Re: Pippin Lane and Montgomery Lane
Dear Mr. smith:
.
prov
addi
work
Geor
Since we last spoke on the telephone, the County Attorney has
ded verification that there is no way to recover any
ional funds from Langford Farms, Inc. to complete the road
Attached is a copy of the 13 January 1993 letter from
e st. John.
The Board of Supervisors at their meeting on 2 December 1992
auth rized the appropriation of funds in the amount of $22,000
with the condition that the homeowners contribute 50 percent of
$12, 00 which is the amount outstanding to complete the work. I
am c rrently holding $10,000 from the Developer. Therefore, the
50 p rcent contribution from the homeowners would be $6,000.
I have a letter of agreement with the two contractors to lock
in t e price for doing the work until mid April 1993. Please
advi e the homeowners association of the Board action. If you
have any questions, I will be glad to meet with you.
Sincerely,
J~
Jo Higgins
Director of Engineering
JHI
Atta hment
. Copy:
Bob Brandenburger
George st. John
/6
r-... " (f"'IA 11\ """""'1""\ "'^rA
./'
.
GEORGE R. ST. OHN
COUNTY ATTOR EY
"
:a....
~ .--'----~. ----.----
.(.o,) "
\
\
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney
416 Park Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Telephone 296-7138
\" .~J;\
\ ~,
\,,' ,;"'0
..". / i ['. \\ '/
">" I_I.\~ ).'
JAMES M. BOWLING, IV
OEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
January 13, 1993
Jo iggins
Coun y Engineer
Albe arle County
401 clntire Road
Char ottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
.
Dear Jo:
Langford Subdivision
B
bond
subd
atte
sure
ther
reca
deve
sure
I have ascertained that not only does Langford Farms, Inc.,
onger own any property in the County, but that the
ration itself has been defunct since 1986. That is, it has
xisted, and therefore has had no assets, since that year.
cause the corporation alone was the sole principal on the
and was solely responsible for fulfillment of the
vision requirements, I do not believe we can prevail in
pting to hold the individuals responsible. Of course, the
y has been discharged by the payment of bond proceeds, and
fore it is my opinion that it will be futile to attempt to
ture any of the necessary funds for these roads, from the
oper, any individuals associated with the developer, or the
y.
other words, the only source of these funds is the
wners association, the County, or some combination thereof.
Sincerely yours,
91e~
George R. st. John
County Attorney
. GRSt Itlh
'1
,...
......
"
Ci
j, \
i \:
~,!rv
(J ,.. 1992
'.'V
'_\qTLi.;:;:i iTf\
\ : \ Ii
\" '.1
\ I ~ 1
.: \ 111
../ : i \ I
'-' ---'''--'~l-rj' l Ll i
U IJ i..~:1 I....:)
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
~..' ,~:~-' ;..; C~ t SL;? E;~\\/ 'S()f\S
AGENDA TITLE:
Langfo d Subdivision, Section 2
Pippin Lane and Montgomery Lane
AGENDA DATE:
December 2, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
q~,//)00 .1{)t
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJEC
Approp
Accept
Public Road
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes (1)
(to be provided
separately)
Brandenburger
and
Ms.
REVIEWED BY:
IlfP
BACKGR UNO: Four roads were constructed in the Langford Subdivision. In July 1979, two of
the fou roads were accepted by VDOT. The other two roads, Pippin Lane and Montgomery Lane,
were br ught up to the required standard in 1987 but were not accepted because there were not
three ccupied dwellings. Three years later, the third occupied residence requirement was
met. I 1991, the Engineering Department required the Developer to bring these two roads up
to state standards for VDOT acceptance.
Due to he 12 years since Montgomery Lane was constructed, the road width had decreased by
approxi ately two feet due to the encroachment of vegetation. Therefore, this road requires
a more substantial upgrade to be in conformance with the approved plans compared to Pippin
Lane. In September 1991, the bond was called due to the Developer's refusal to do this
corrective work. The County is currently holding $10,000 cash paid by the Developer.
DISCUSS ON: The cost to complete the corrective work, not including any pavement patching,
is appr ximately $13,000. The cost for the pavement corrections for both roads is $8,725.
The total cost of approximately $22,000 exceeds the called bond by $12,000. In order to
complet these roads prior to the winter season, the appropriation to follow will authorize
expendi ure of $22,000; $10,000 from the developer and $12,000 from savings in
other C unty projects. The County Attorney will endeavor to recover the $12,000 from the
develop r but recovery is uncertain.
This is to request that the Board appropriate $22,000 to complete this work.
92.176
, '11 f
~:,!g_-~Ct? ~CI3
9....~.. /0' ..~- .
4l._"..Y:_l</
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
M MORANDUM
OM:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community I \Il\()
Development UW
TE:
February 26, 1993
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA)
Jurisdictional Area Amendment for David W. Booth/Sandra
Andrews and Sherwood Exum (GOCO, Inc.) - Tax Map 79,
Parcels 18 and 19
is item will be before you as a public hearing on March 3,
93. Enclosed is the original report on this matter from
tober and subsequent information regarding each parcel.
79 Parcel 19 (Booth/Andrews)
mples from the well on this property were taken by Applied
chnology and Engineering, P.C. (January 28, 1993 letter from
hn W. Walenten). The Department of Engineering has provided
sponse (February 24, 1993 memo from Jack Kelsey). Engineering
aff does not find that jurisdictional area amendment is
equately justified.
79 Parcel 18 (GOCO)
is property was the subject of the August 14, 1989 State Water
ntrol Board letter and the "Site, Risk and Remediation
sessment of Groundwater Contamination at the Shadwell "76'1
ation Shadwell, Virginia" report. Substantial petroleum
ntamination was found in the domestic well supply at this site.
Corrective Action Plan (page 24 of the report) was identified.
has since been found that the line carrying runoff from the
avel area near the unloading rack is not a source contaminating
( 't
bemarle County Board of Supervisors
bruary 26, 1993
ge 2
stated previously, utility service outside of designated
owth areas has typically been limited to those cases where
operties have experienced quality/quantity problems and are
jacent to existing lines. Booth/Andrews desires water only
d has a documented coliform level not acceptable for drinking
ter. However, the recommended procedure for resolution of this
oblem has not been undertaken. Staff does not recommend
risdictional area amendment for Parcel 19 (Booth/Andrews) until
e four step procedure for resolving the coliform problem has
en exhausted. GOCO desires water only to existing structures
a d has documented localized petroleum contamination. No new
w II source has been attempted to be established. The use of the
s'te is restricted by its non-conforming zoning status and
o -site activities do not require more than domestic water needs.
S aff does not recommend jurisdictional area amendment for Parcel
1 (GOCO) until evidence is provided that no other on-site water
s urce is available.
e well. According to Mr. Harry Montague, a representative of
CO, it is now believed that contamination of the unloading rack
ea and contamination of the well were unrelated. The well is
lieved to be the source of isolated contamination resulting
om vandalism. The well is no longer being used as there is
ly one employee on-site. GOCO has not attempted to establish
other domestic well on-site, although monitoring wells
tablished for the assessment indicate the contamination was
calized.
Booth/Andrews
Exum
Bill Brent
Jo Higgins
..
( ,
ROSYSTEMS INC
r. Harry Montague, President
OCO OIL Company
9 4 Harris Street
harlottesville, VA 22901
Site Selection for New Water Supply Well, Shadwell Store, Route 250.
er your request, I have analyzed the groundwater data for the above referenced Site to
etermine the best location for the placement of a new water supply well on GOCO's property.
he data I reviewed is contained in the June 12, 1990 report HYDROSYSTEMS prepared for
s bmission to the Virginia State Water Control Board and is titled "Site, Risk, and Remediation
ssessment of Groundwater Contamination at the Shadwell 76 Station, Shadwell, Virginia". As
ou are aware, the current water supply well is contaminated with petroleum, mainly in the form
f gasoline type compounds, Benzene concentrations ereatly exceed the U.S. EPA and Virginia
rinking Water Standard of 5 ppb, Benzene is a known carcinogen.
o evaluate potential new water supply well locations on GOCO's property, I reviewed all of
t e existing data including water quality, groundwater flow direction, potential sources of
ontamination, geologic conditions, and available area, Because of the existing severe
ontamination in the upgradient areas of the site, the use of a septic field to the north of the
tation, the existence of an underground storage tank, unpaved dispensing areas, and
roundwater flow to the northwest, HYDROSYSTEMS has determined that most of the property
i absolutely unsuitable for the installation of a water supply well. Wells placed within this
rea will either immediately encounter contaminated groundwater or will upon usage draw in
ontaminated groundwater from other areas of the site once the well is placed in operation.
his leaves one small area at the southern point of the site, Placing a water supply well here
ill be a gamble at best. Well MW-4 was contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons just
bove the Virginia Drinking Water Standards, The source of this contamination is not known.
n addition, the most highly contaminated monitoring well on site is only 135 feet away at the
I ading rack. It is very possible that a water supply well in this location will draw in
2340 Commonwealth Drive. Suite 202 . Charlottesville. VA . 22901
(804) 973-9740
~
, '
r. Harry Montague
rcb 2, 1993
P ge 2
c ntaminated groundwater from the site to the north, In my experience, this is not an
u common occurrence. I am currently working on a case in Albemarle County where a new
ell drilled 250 feet up hill from an area of gasoline contamination became contaminated after
i was put into use. Everyone assumed the well was far enough away and was upgradient of the
c ntamination, Because of the fractured nature of the bedrock aquifer systems in Albemarle
ounty, the influence of a pumping well can reach long distances along those fractures, even
p lling in groundwater from downgradient areas as was seen in this case.
use of the severity of the groundwater contamination at this site and the existing geologic
c nditions, HYDROSYSTEMS cannot recommend the placement of a water supply well on the
OCO property. We are not comfortable with the minimal isolation distances available, We
ould instead recommend that a location on one of the surrounding properties be considered or
possible tapping into the proposed water main.
I you have any questions concerning this letter report or if you wish to pursue potential off-site
ell locations, please contact me at your convenience.
YDROSYSTEMS INC_
",
',1
:...
2
.
, ..
)' .;'\.
"0-
'"i
.;...~ "I ::111,
" I ItlllltLI1:.'
!"'i I '111111 I
\...\ , IIIII'l'ti
':,'-':, ! !ll!!l:;!r~
PIO,. I
L..~ , '''"iii' \
:: " ,,\ \\\1111 :\
.\...~ r 11\\1\11111:\
;; I 1 1\ 1111; \
: i , I 1\\1'111.
r'f '11111,,11:
'!,...t J / \\,\III"II!
: i iI/ 11\ ik
'l-"ll 1 I 11\\ 1\;
: ( . 1 ,III I'
b: I'i '1111 II
; ! / 1 I III It!
j"': I' \ III ill
: i" \ \II hit
:....~I 1 I 1I1\11I1I1~
: :, 11111\1111
: ''': I \1\11111111
: : ,. 111111\111\
:...~. ;" 1(\\\11 .
; : I . .11111111\11
;...; I · 11,1111\11\
:; L 1111111111 \
~-': '\ W; 11",111',
:: , 11111\11 \
.HI '111111,,1
: : I , 11'111 'j
~'-': I /\,111\'\' ~ I I
' , , ,111111..
a: I I I II II'>~ \
(5'\"-\ \ I ,1111\:11\ I
a:" I ./1 II
';l!''':I"l'/llil,\ I
a:: 1 \ .', r IIII\~ ,I \
~':" I \ ' / r I I I" ,'I. ", ~"
~': "f"l''..;.'\.
0.;.... \, ,I,..~~~l\
' ~ ~ \,' ~'\ s..~ '
j--:' I \ '~"
: i \ \
,-~ \ \
:; \ 11
:.._~ I .."\ I ;
:: \ ~\ \ ~ :. '.
: : 1 I .... \,
+"; I \ ........ ":-l
: i / \ ,...."
j''': " ~,,~ :\:'"
: ; I t-t...... :."'-;-
t"-r, ..... - ':., "''I...
' :, ....,
'\"'r, ~
.\..-t
...1"
: {'
i !
, 1.-
1', i
~..~.
;._<. 1\
~'h' I \
. , I \
(t. !
:",' I
t' i
i..,,;, I
. 'I
i :)
~"'"
J..r,
i 'i
.:.. . ~
; ~
.r.'r
.........
.".,..",."".,',.,.,.".
10
"
....,
c,'i:.
<z,?o\o
~
t3
~
V'\
..,.
~
~~
~~
~~
~Oe
6~~
Vl .
~
-J
o "
o ,
..........{
~,
7,~\J
0'\~
?-O
0~"
;:::
C)
~
'0
c::l
..J::
(/)
....
.....
.9
.....
c::l
.....
CIJ
':0
t--
,-
v
~
"d
ro
..J::
','./)
C)
..c:
.....
....
ro
Vl
c:
o
....
ro
u
o
-
.,
\
\
\
-
v
~
Of)
c:
.t::
o
.....
'2
o
~
c::
't::
o
..D
'0
c:
ro
>-.
..c:
0..
ro
....
on
o
0..
o
.....
C)
..c:
.....
Of)
c::
.~
o
..c:
Vl
c::
ro
P..
.B<t:
(;3>
"<t'
C)
1-0
::3
Of)
~
YDROSYSTEMS INC_
.
,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
RECEIVED
FEB 2 (. 199J
MEMORANDUM
r___" c
l.. ,1 r... '.''''' ~.-, , 'Y'" ~'.~
.J ....... I' ' , ' ~
L ':.....~~, ~ 1 ~ ~ J ~ ~
D. e r)i'
... ~~' ~.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Wayne Cilimberg - Director of Plan '
February 24, 1993
Jack M. Kelsey, PE - Civil Engineer
Jurisdictional Area Request - Tax Map 79 Parcel 19
As requested this Department has reviewed the analysis of the drinking water sampled from
the above referenced private well and the technical grounds for support of an extension to the
ACSA jurisdictional area,
Sampling and testing of this well indicated unacceptable coliform bacteria levels, According
to the Thomas Jefferson Health Department this type of contamination is very common
(especially in older wells) and is a problem they deal with on a daily basis. Very rarely is
the groundwater the source of this type of contamination. Bacteria contamination is
generally due to intrusion of surface runoff into the well as a result of poor installation or (in
the case of old wells) the standards utilized at that time,
The Health Department utilizes a four step procedure for recommending a resolution to these
problems, The first recommendation is to protect the wellhead from the intrusion of surface
runoff, chlorinate and flush the well to remove the bacteria from the stored water as well as
the liner and appurtences, and then test the water. Should these measures fail to correct the
contamination, the second recommendation is to install a new well in accordance with present
standards, If bacteria contamination continues to persist, installation of a chlorination system
is then recommended. Lastly, for the rare case when all options fail, the Health Department
will recommend the owner apply for extension of the ACSA jurisdictional 'area,
As a policy the County has discouraged extension of ACSA jurisdictional areas in other than
County designated growth areas, unless public health and safety is endangered, This site is
not located within a County designated growth area.
t,
Wayne Cilimberg
February 24, 1993
Page 2
The scope of the sampling and testing of this well was limited to the determination of the
water quality in the present condition of the well and are not conclusive evidence that the
well is a danger to public health and safety,
Extension of the ACSA jurisdictional area is not adequately justified until disinfection,
remedial measures to eliminate the source of the contamination, and/or the other options
described above are attempted and failed. Therefore, at this time the Engineering
Department cannot support this request.
JMK/
CC: 10 Higgins - Director of Engineering
. .
Planning Dept
COMMONVlJE,ALTII of vnRGKNIA
&,:~{'~\
~~,-\."\",,~,,,\ "
JJ;1 ',l ,~ '
(~IJ :1.i~'.1 .~.
.J' l' I
'~ I" " , t
, i ';:,I
\ ~1~t:~~~">>
"l;~~. "-J!;'~
"'ifJlJo;v.<-
RECEIVED
--
NOV 2 5 1992
Ri hard N, Burton
E e<:ulive Direclor
STATE nT/ATEl? CON7RCn nO/IR!)
211/ UdllliltOIl Street
Pos Oilier nox 111 ,1:1
n,,:IHlIO' d. V"g"'la 71?:J() 11 ~:\
f\()~) 361-00:)1j
Please reply to: Vallrl' Rppionnl Olllce
116 No, III Main Slr~et
P. 0, [lo\ ~68
Brldgpwnkr, Virginia 22012
(703) 8n-2~q5
August 14, 1~)89
Mr. Sherwood Exum
92 Harris Street
Ch rlottesville, Virginia 22901
Shadwell GOCO "76" - Albemarle County, PC 89-1392
Mr. Exum:
is in regard to the report of the taste and odor of petroleum in
th domestic well water supply at the referenced site. On April 28,
19 9 Mr. John Paul Jones, Albemarle Fire Inspector, reported
pe roleum contamination at the referenced site. On June 29, 1989
Mr. Larry Carpenter of this office obtained water samples for
an lysis from the well which serves this site. Analytical rE~sults
fr m these samples (copy attached) indicate substantial petroleum
tamination is affecting ground water at this site.
to the presence of this contamination, Valley Regional st:aff
ieve that a site, risk and remediation assessment is necessary to
tect human safety and the environment. Therefore, I must request
o Oil Company to submit a site, risk and remediation assessment by
tember 29, 1989. To be considered complete, these assessments
t address the following elements.
~
J\ugust 14, 1989
-2-
Mr. Sherwood Exum
SITE ASSESSMENT
A. Include data on the physical/chemical properties of the
contaminant
B. Nature and quantity of release
c. site characterization [soils, aquifer, strata]
1) Geologic
2). Hydrologic
D. Land/water usage, potential usage [population distribution,
potential receptors]
E. contamination characterization - vertical and lateral
extent for each phase (if applicable]
1) Vapor phase
2) Dissolved phase
3) Free product phase
RISIZ ASSESSMENT
A. potential migration
B. Migration routes
1) Man-made
2) Natural
c. potential and impacted receptors [Human and Non-Human]
D. Potential/level further environmental damage
REM~D~ATION ASSESSMENT
A. potential for remediation [feasibility]
B. Degree of remediation/end point
c. Applicable technologies
D. Projected duration
..~, f
)
,~:'(';4' 1989 -)- Mr. Sherwood Exum
~::<ank you for your continuing cooperation. Should you or your
consu tant have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.
CC: c Sterrett/VRO File
ep Central
. John P. Jones
401 MCIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596
re
Sincerely,
jc'~~ P. lj~
/James D. Green
~egional UST Geologist
)y
;l
, f .
June 12, 1990
PREPARED FOR:
MR. SHERWOOD EXUM, PRESIDENT
GOCO OIL COMPANY
924 HARRIS STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
PREPARED BY:
HYDROSYSTEMS, INC.
2340 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE
SUITE 202
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
SITE, RISK, AND REMEDIATION
ASSESSMENT OF
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
AT THE SHADWELL "76" STATION
SHADWELL, VIRGINIA
w~i@)!ltWlElID
~'U \\\N i2 lCl10
~
vAl-LEY Rf:GlO
QF'f"\CE
R"""'"
.~t,f.
CONTACT: JEFFREY A. SITLER
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
804-973-9740
~q.- J39~
S f!, it-
OCT u 6 1992
I"lUIH' '\1"1('" .... ,...,.., .
" . '.i\lh!!l'~\~ Ut.l" ! .
YOROSYSTEMS INC_
\
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1,0 INTRODUcrrON ",..,"',.,""'"",.,...",."""".",.., 1
2,0 SITE ASSESSMENT, . , , , , , . , , , . . , , . , , , . . , , , . . , . . . , , , , , . , . , , , , . " 2
2,1 Site Location, Description, and Land Use .,.,..".",."..",.... 2
2,2 Nature and Ouantity of Release """",..",.."""".."." 7
2.3 Hydrogeology ',..,..,..,',.,.,...,."""".,...,....,.", 8
2.4 Contamination Investigation ,.,..,.,..,..,.".".""""",.. 12
2,4.1 Methods"."."",.,.,.""",.."."..,.",.,., 12
2.4,1.1 Soil Gas SUIVey , , , , . . , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , . . . , . . .. 12
2.4,1.2 Boring Installations and Soil Sampling, , , , . , . .0 , , ,. 13
2.4,1.3 Monitoring Well Installation .,.".".,.".,...". 14
2.4.1.4 Well Development And Ground Water Sampling.. , , .. 16
2.4,1.5 Lahoratory Analyses of Soils and Groundwater ,...,.. 16
2.4.2 Vapor Phase - Contamination in the Unsaturated Zone ,.,... 16
2.4.3 Free Product Phase - Contamination on the Water Table .".. 17
2.4.4 Dissolved Phase - Contamination in the Ground Water, , , . , .. 18
3,0 RISK ASSESSMENT ',..,',.".".".,.,.,.,.".."""""".. 20
3.1 Man-Made Pathways, , , , . , , , , , . , , , , , , , , . , . , , , , , , , . , . , , . , . .. 20
3,2 Groundwater Pathway, , , , , . , , , , , . , , , , , , . , . . , . . , , . , , . , , , , , ., 21:
3.3 Surface Water Pathway . . , , . , , , , , , , . , , , . , , . , , , . , , . , , , , , , , , ., 22
3,4 Air Pathway "',.,""',.,',.."".".,.",.."..""".. 22
4.0 REMEDIA nON ASSESSMENT ."..,.."..".,.".."".",.",. 23
5,0 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ,.,',.".".",.".""....,.,.,.,. 24
APPENDIX 1 - BORING LOG AND WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
APPENDIX 2 - SOIL GAS SURVEY DATA
APPENDIX 3 - LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS
APPENDIX 4 - TANK AND LINE INTEGRITY TEST REPORT
YDROSYSTEMS wc_
f ,.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3,
Figure 4.
Figure 5,
Figure 6,
I
LIST OF FIGURES
Topographic Map .,"",.,.""""""""..,.,.,...".. 4
. Location of commercial and residential wells , . , , . . . . , , , . , . , . , , ., 5
Site layout, , . . , , , , . . , , , , . . . , , , , . , , , . , . , . . . . . , , , , . . , , , . ., 6
Site plan showing the topography and boring/monitoring well
locations .":..",."...."..,...".".",.""...,,... 10
Groundwater flow direction, , , . , . , , , . , , . , , . , , , . , , , . . . , , , , ,. 11
Soil gas survey sampling locations ..,.",.""."""."..". 15
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Headspace Analyses of Split Spoon Samples ',.,.""",..,..,.". 14
Table 2 - Laboratory Analyses of Groundwater Samples , , , , , , , , , . . , , , . , , , , " 19
HYOROSYSTEMS INC_
f
...
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of an investigation of groundwater contamination from
petroleum hydrocarbons at the Shadwell "76" Service Station and distribution center on
Route 250 in Shadwell, Virginia, HYDROSYSTEMS was engaged to conduct this
investigation by Mr. Sherwood Exum of GOCO Oil Company of Charlottesville, Virginia,
owner of the facility.
This investigation was requested by the State Water Control Board (SWCB) in their letter
of August 14, 1989 to Mr, Exum, The SWCB action was initiated in response to a report
of petroleum taste and odor in the domestic well water supply at the site, This report was
filed by the Albemarle Fire Inspector, Mr. John Paul Jones on April 28, 1989. On June 29,
1989 the SWCB collected water samples from the well which serves the site, Analytical
results of these samples, provided in Section 2.4.4, indicate that petroleum contamination
is affecting ground water quality at the site. Based on these results, the SWCB requested
GOCO Oil Company to prepare and submit a Site, Risk, and Remediation Assessment to
address the apparent contamination at the site.
The purpose of this assessment is to identify the source, nature, and extent of contamination
at this site, assess the risks which such contamination poses, and determine the need for
remediation or corrective action, This study is intended to satisfy draft SWCB regulations
governing release response and corrective actions for underground storage tank (UST)
systems containing petroleum products [VR ' 680-13-02, Parts V and VI],
1
YDROS YSTEMS lNe_
I
2.0 SITE ASSESSMENT
2.1 Site Location, Description. and Land Use
The Shadwell "76" service station and distribution center is located along the northern side
of State Route 250 in Shadwell, Albemarle County, Virginia, as shown in Figure 1. The
property is hounded by Route 250 to the southwest, a C&O railroad right-of-way downslope
and to the northwest, and private property (Michie residence) upslope to the east. The
property is located at the head of a relatively shallow, narrow ravine which trends west-
sou thwest toward the Rivanna River. The C&O railroad tracks lie within this ravine along
the northeast boundary of the property, An unnamed, intermittent stream also t10ws in this
ravine along the railroad tracks. This stream discharges to the Rivanna River,
approximately 2000 feet west-southwest from the facility boundary,
The area surrounding the site is rural, with mixed agricultural, residential, and commercial
land uses, Land use to the east and upgradient of the site is primarily agricultural, with the
Michie residence and commercial construction company office located approximately 500
feet from the site on the hill to the east. Additional agricultural land occurs to the north
across the railroad tracks, with a convenience store (the Shadwell Food Store) and private
residence located approximately 500 feet to the northwest of the site, Finally, largely
undeveloped land occurs southwest of the site across Route 250, The Stone-Robinson
elementary school and private residence (Lang residence) are located across Route 250 to
the southwest, approximately 1000 feet downgradient of the site. A railroad spur and gravel
storage area from the Luckstone Quarry is also located west of the site along the C&O
railroad tracks across Route 250, All of the surrounding residences and commercial
properties are served by private wells, as shown in Figure 2.
The Shadwell "76" station is both a commercial gas station and a bulk distribution center
for gasoline and fuel oil for OOCO Oil Company, The original facility, built in
approximately 1940, consisted of the station building and four 15,000 gallon above-ground
tanks located behind the building as shown on Figure 3, The original piping from these
tanks ran underground from the tanks directly underneath the building, to truck loading
racks on the front porch of the building, Piping also ran to the far southwest corner of the
property to a railroad unloading pad near the former railroad station. The two gas pumps
in the front of the building were served by two small (<550 gallon, now removed) USTs
located in the grassy area immediately adjacent to the pumps,
2
HYOAOSYSTEMS INC_
<..
GOCO Oil Company bought the property in 1963, and soon thereafter moved the unloading
rack from near the old railroad station to beside the front porch of the building, next to the
loading racks. In approximately 1974-75, major changes were made to all piping at the
facility, The loading/unloading racks were moved from the porch to its present location in
the lot adjacent to the tanks, The small USTs near the gas pumps were retired and new
piping from the above-ground tanks to these pumps was installed as shown in Figure 3. The
12,000 gallon kerosene UST, piping, and pump, and the diesel piping and pump were also
installed at this time. The rear of the property was filled and graded, to build a truck
staging and turn-around area,
Presently, the four aboveground tanks are used to store super unleaded, regular leaded,
regular unleaded, and diesel fuel. The adjacent UST currently stores kerosene. A complete
UST notification form has been submitted to the SWCB for this kerosene tank installation.
3
HYDROSYSTEMS INC_
"
Figure 1.
Topographic Map (U,S,G,S. Charlottesville East, VA 7,S-Minute Quadrangle)
showing the location of the Shadwell "76" Station Virginia.
4
YDAOSYSTEMS wc_
.(
.....-- .
....
Figure 2.
Location of commercial and residential wells in the vicinity of the Shadwell
"76" Station, Shadwell, VA.
5
YDROSYSTEMS lNe
,.
Gi
>
nJ
~
Cl
-
0
LiJ .... G)
-I : 0)
~ U. "0
0 0 W
en ~
o
z
w
Cl
W
-I
",
... ".
.. \. \.
~...
.......
..........
.....
.....................
.......................
.,.,:::;;,............ ,; Ul
................ C.
Ul E
d&
p - -- - -c:::I
.................................:........................................
. ",
. ".
~c.
~
~1
Ill'
8:
..J:
2:
f:
.
. ,
)(.
0'
J!
,
,
,
,
z
o
r=
~
I-
CIJ
Do a.
i ~
:.::c..
,
,
i,q
, ow
: ~
,....I
:i
:11:
, .
: ~
1!
...,.......'..r........,..,...... ~.._: ~
"..,.~I-
.... 0
....,...,.. ffi
.... :.::
\0
:z
'::l
'0
I ~
/ ffi
.... 0
......,.",..,/ 5
...............--.................
.~....
\l,
'~
" ~
~ ~
. ,
\~ .............
,I
//
,
.
,
L.
-I
D~
r:
<C
l-
ll)
ex:
ex:
ex:
~
I I
I I
ii
ii
i
CIJ
:x::
o
~
ex:
l-
e
~
o
15
!~
!
I i
!
!
!
i
i i
ii
....
ffii!
~i!
~ii
~i!
it
i i
, ,
! !
j i
!!
P
i i
4)
~
c
.)(
c:
IV
I-
-
Q3
~
"0
C';l
..c::
C/.)
=
.9
...
ro
r/5
\0
r--
-
~
~
"0
ro
..c::
C/.)
o
..c::
...
...
ro
CIl
=
,9
...
ro
u
.9
...
=
o
8
.9-
:l
0'"
o
OJ)
=
'Vi
=
o
0..
CIl
:a
Q3
:l
......
"0
=
ro
bO
=
'a
'a
~-
I::
ro
...
\C
OJ)
=
.~
o
..c::
CIl
.....
:l
o
>.
~
~<
Ci5>
M
o
...
:l
OJ)
Li:
HYDROSYSTEMS INC_
2.2 Natme and Quantity of Relense
To date, no release from the kerosene UST or piping serving the aboveground tanks have
been confirmed. Although of questionable value for leak detection, GOCO has also
indicated that inventory control records from these systems show no significant product
losses, Addi tionally, soil borings, monitoring wells, and soil gas survey data show no
evidence of free product occurring anywhere on the site.
As described in Section 2.4.4, the highest levels of ground water quality degradation occur
near the loading/unloading rack, Therefore, it is likely that this structure or its operation
are responsible for at least part of the contamination at the site, with the most likely sources
being either overfill or spillage, Significant leakage from the lines serving the rack appears
unlikely, since no significant soil contamination or free product was found in the boring or
well installed adjacent to this rack or on the surface where the lines are exposed. Pressure
testing of these lines has confirmed that they currently are not leaking, thus, not a current
source of contamination (Appendix 4). Therefore, since the lines test tight, the most likely
source is overfill and spillage at rack, and past operations, Soil gas data collected
immediately adjacent to the rack showed high levels of organic vapors, a situation commonly
found at loading racks resulting from surface spillage.
The kerosene UST does not appear to be a source of contamination, Soil samples collected
from MW-3, placed adjacent to the tank show insignificant levels of hydrocarbons, and
groundwater samples collected from this boring show no dissolved hydrocarbons. The soil
gas data in this area also show background values, Finally, tightness testing results on the
tank confirm that it is not leaking.
Another potential contaminant source investigated was the abandoned USTs stockpiled on
the rear of the property. However, soil gas survey data collected immediately beneath these
tanks show very low levels of organic vapors, If a release had occurred from these tanks at
any time, residual soil organic vapors would be detected in the underlying soils.
Additionally screening of vapors in the tanks themselves show low levels of organic vapors,
suggesting that the tanks had been ~mptied and cleaned or present on-site for an extended
period of time.
Finally, the past practices, unrelated to the current operation at the facility may be
responsible for at least part of the contamination. This facility has been in operation since
the 1940s, It is likely that isolated spillage and leakage has occurred in the past.
7
HYDROSYSTEMSwc__
2.3 Hydrogeology
The site is located just south of the contact between the Catoctin Formation and the
Loudoun Formation, This contact appears to run along the C&O railroad which borders
the site to the north. The Loudoun Formation in this area consists of shaley sandstones,
sandy shales, and yellow/pink paper-bedded shales, while the Catoctin Formation consists
of greenstone, or metamorphosed basalt. Based on geologic maps, the site appears to be
underlain by the Loudoun Formation, although borings which terminated at rock surface
(refusal) showed some greenstone chips. It is likely that the contact between the two
formations is not distinct in this area.
Figure 4 provides a site plan showing topography and boring/monitoring well locations.
Boring data (Appendix 1) show that silty saprolitic soils ranging in thickness from 20-50+
feet overly bedrock on the site, Competent rock (refusal) was encountered a approximately
20 feet in depth in the rear portion of the site near the unloading rack and kerosene UST
(MW-2, MW-3). However, soils thicken to greater than 40 - 50 feet upgradient of the site
near MW-l and along the downgradient boundary of the site near MW-4 and MW-5.
Competent rock (refusal) was not encountered in these borings. These saprolitic soils show
significant structure and clearly defined bedding planes at approximately 45-600, and are
interspersed with seams of clay and more-intact rock fragments,
Groundwater appears to occur under unconfined conditions across the site. Depth to
groundwater ranges from 17-22 feet in topographically higher portions of the site (MW-l
and MW-4) to 9-12 feet across the rear of the property (MW-2 and MW-3) and in the
topographically lower front portion of the property. Groundwater therefore occurs within
the saprolitic soils, although the most appreciable water-bearing zones appear to Occur at
the top of bedrock, The significant structure and bedding planes observed in these soils
clearly influences groundwater flow both above and below the groundwater table,
Water level data collected from the monitoring wells show groundwater to be flowing west-
northwest across the site, from the highland located beyond the rear of the property to the
topographically lower western corner of the site near the C&O railroad cut and Route 250,
as shown in Figure 5, Water levels in MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 differ by less than 0,5 feet,
revealing a very flat gradient in this area, After rainfall events, water levels in MW-2 and
MW-3 are often a few tenths of a foot higher than the intended upgradient well, MW-"l,
These water levels are obviously affected by rainfall/recharge, the highly-structured
~aprolitic soils, and the location of competent rock, In MW-l, MW-2, and MW-3 either
8
HYDROSYSTEMS INC_
.
.
refusal or a hard saprolitic/rock Llyer was encountered at approximately 347 feet MSL,
while borings placed along the front of the property (MW-4, MW-5) did not encounter rock,
even to well below this depth, This competent rock surface/layer may serve to locally
redirect or control flow in this are~:, especially during recharge events,
As shown on Figure 5, water levels in MW-2 and MW-3 are at or slightly higher than the
elevation of the intermittent stream along the northern boundary of the property, indicating
that groundwater discharges to the stream in this area. Groundwater discharge to this
stream is also indicated by wet conJitions and seepage occurring at the northwest corner of
the station building at approximc.tely the same elevation. However, along Route 250
(MW -5) groundwater levels drop to approximately 7 feet below the stream elevation,
suggesting that the stream is perched above the water table in this area.
The overall groundwater gradient across the site is approximately 0,05. Typical hydraulic
conductivity values for saprolitic soils derived from the Loudoun Formation average
approximately lxlO-4 cm/s, Effective porosities for such soils could be assumed to be on
the order of 0.2-0.5, while effective porosities for the underlying rock may be as low as O,Ol.
Assuming these values, ground water flow velocities on site would be expected to range from
20-550 ft/yr. This somewhat large range is possibly due to the heterogeneous conditions
observed on site,
9
YDROSYSTEMS INC_
. .
~.\).
I: : .J~"
1\ I /1'1 ...l
i..-~ J\lJl1hL ui
L.\ /11:::11111' ~;.
;: I 11111111/1"'; t:!:. .
;._~ ! :!!IIP!I!_~ . ~;;. ,
;; ;'1:::,:1; i. , ,~ "\
'. , 1"11"", .. -<> )...,
f"1 I '~IIIII\III.\ .. \\\~~: \ ". \
+,..f ,I '11,11'1\1,1\1,1 \ ,..,...~.... " ...-."- \ \::r\,:,'\. ....
l...L "II III . \ " '.... ....
' , I, 11'11'111, .,.........,. ,\ \ \\. 'i,
! : II III '1111 ,.,.'.. --, :--"''..:.;... '\\ \"" ... i\,
"r....:., 111111,.11, '..... '.~ ".... '\ \\ '\ "l \\
' . ., r.,1111 f-.; '\' : '" "" '\ \\:-. '. \'
: : J 'I \Z., j, . ..: '~.."
~_..: I ' I' "l1J d., . , " % ~ \ \ \. '<:, \'\
: ;>! dlll~1\ ", "~ "'~ \ \ \\. ~"~
i-If 1; , \ 1111 If , '."...... \~\\ \\\ ,
: ! , , \ III I! ~ '. '., "" ... \ \\ '\ ~,
]""'1/,' \\ugJl',li:: ~ ,,:,', :... __\~\\\\\ \'\\. ~,~\\
: I, \IIIUJ Ie. i- ~, _- '-l. \- ( i
;....~, 11I1111Iill~ t\~ ~ '...._-- ...~\\\\ ~.;. ','\
: ! I 111111111 I-.. ill _ i ... \~ \ \ -..:..... \
['''-r / '1111111111 I 'bl" oj 1';':..... \~,\\\ \-..., .,'..
: : I ~ '1111111111 I rex:r-- -, ::t '. \'. ~~\ \ \ \, " .
f'-r I a 01 '11111111 . ~ :E '~.'. .... \ \ \ \ \ ,\~
l...; I :,11111/1111'11 1 t.=~~l ...... (Ej,<'", \\\\ \" "~\\'
: : I ,f 111I \ I / ,-:::.::..~ _ ~"'\ 7!' \ < . " \ \ \ "., ~
~-,; I ~111111\1:l II Ef-'~\-.\ 't:!: .",~~\\\ L.\ ~,,:'
1 ~ I ,11))1'/111 I e \~" ,..:~ '\~\ \\\1"0\ \~"
.!-.! I 1"'1,1,1, \ I, S \ \\\ r" _. '~~\ \,\ \... '...':
: : I I "1111111 i " o~ \ \,1:, ... \\ ~., ,:-\\ ~\ \... ....~'
;'-': 1 I '1'111111/ \ " ~ \ 1\': \ \J 0, ': '. "\, ~\ \ ',.f-. ",,,
: ji I1II \ I ...., '\: \ ~\' '.~\\\\ as ""'.
;...~ \ .' IIIIIIII!) \ \ Le~ ~ I ~ \ '. "', ",,\~\\\ \ ~ ...~'.
:: ., 1,"1 I I I S II IA " \ J,\ \~ : '. '
1-"[ \ .~I /1,11,1,1\\\\\ I II I 0 ;. \I~\ \. )~ "~0'\~\ ~..... "\':"""~ I
.. J I II \ 'Lex:~J J '. \ '~\\\ICQ'"'' . ~ <:
.H \ i 111111,,\ 'I " ~~ \. \ '.11"", \ \\" , ____
.' , \ I I" ",,,, ...,,! g! <,. \. . '\''''1''' ...~~.. . ~
H. \IJI.IIJ~~."','""",-~__o._'(~",,,:_ .... ~\ \\\\\\\...'
.: IJ 'I ;'<,~\~, \ --;-~_,_2:::::::~..__::.,.... ::!; \ ).\\\\.......,
H.\ 1\ "....\\"\.,'---_. _---....::-",,'. '-. ::l \ ""\\\\\ .'., l'
!; \ \ \~~ 8-':.--:':' - .~,,~ "\~" ~ '\ I ....\\\\,\\.\ 1\'...
. -~ \, "'-- .... " , \ ,. l1J .\ \ . ".
;; ,\ I ' . ',' - ./ ~,\ \ \ "'" \ \ \l"l''''' J .....,_
J..-} I \ I \ ' " .- r'; \ \ \ \ \" ~ \ I \\~'~..J ... C\
:; \; , " ' Z : : , , , \ ". 0 \ \ \~ ,\ , '. I. "'-:
! : I \ \ I \ '. " 0 ~: , \ \ \ ",", (\ I \~\. ... ':, "-... .,
roo; I I \. '. '.:... ~ 1== !< \,\,,\'.\\.\J \.1 \\\\ ". \'. ''-,:,...
: :, \ "" , ~ ' .... :: ~""'~i.;..." \;-'" ,'.\\", .",.'. \ ","'.. _ '"
:' " '"" ..... ','--, ,,'\.... .~\ . 1"1' '. __
r"; I I , "'" !;; : :_._' ..... "',,, "" "". :\ ".~~' ... \ .~\ . \
"I ~, ""'.. ---- -\i----o- , " '" ". "\ \ \ \ 'I
t...: f..... 1.............:~~~~., "\"-...: r':l.~. -","\-, ,,~,'~,,'" 'l. .' !"'~' \ .... \ \ \
i :1 -- - "1 v~ "~ ....,-........ _.' "I,.:-..,'~"'::~ ". ! If,.:..: ... \ '\ '
. ' \ " en I . -'-":"\~' ~ ..... . 1 I \ .
'1"';1 :-' 1....., --~. \' J' /'''~~_ n .........._{ . ~ ',\ :-.\, \
! , \ ' ! " \ . -'''''''-'- ... ~ .... I
-~'''f -1'-" _..~ . \!ffi "'- .. b:.- "'--6 t I '!' i ~ '). \ \ \. "\~... \___.... .._....'\ ':~
' I . ' \. '", \ \ . J I I \ \ , " \.,... .\>,
r' ,. .'. . ,\ ~ <. \ , I I I \ \ , ' ., \'..
: I, '?$ :' \ 0 0 \ ..)._,-J._._.Lr-':'1 \ \ ' ''''__'''_'''I\~ \ \ ...
I,~-: '! ': 'ex:' . I "/ I I '-r" \!.,..., I ~. -. I \ ". \
i ' i - . '- !:! .. ...; I. . i' J .1" I \ \'''',-- \ I I ;';", ...... \ ""
,.... , ,- \ "...1 ,1 ..I'n I I \ ..... \ '\ I. I *' j I
! ; 1\ 'l ,:' \ ..'-----... 1',...1\".. \ \ ,l,'..'.\\' ',\ \. " ,',' /~ \
,..., \ .',. \ \ .... \ \ I I / i \
' · I \, \ I I \...., \ I \.\ )' I I I I 'If L."
;-" I \- \. \ \.\ .... \ . , \, . \ I \ \ I I J /.f.. _~.."..
' . I ' '. \ .,'" \ I \. "\ . I I I j , _/ .,', ~<....
: : ,\ ~ ,..~..... ,\." \ \ \ ,\ \ - \ ./,; .1.....- '/..... ,.;:'... ,I,.'
-:..~ , "........... .... \ \ \ II I .......- ~ -..,..,...-~ .,1 .0 ....
: :' \ / "''''','' \ \ ~ .-.'---::- --..:::-.....~;- . "..,. ..i....
: ", ./ \ \, \ ",./1 )_....-___':E:';-;.-;:::::;:_ ""." ...".
'-",' I :: ->/ \ \ \ 0 \ .r,;:.o::''''''......~;::-;:::...:::''.3''_- .,:,:,1 ,_,., =
i i I \./ \ \ ~)-=~ E'~;:{g:::.:- .,.,.,""::.,.,.,'
..,.": I \....,./ \ \ '__-:::::'~ -:o:--",.~~_...... ".\~~ ".:1 t":.
: : '\ : ./ \ ~?:. ,---- :::,"'~ - ..,:;.--:",... ('\ v'
. , I ! s:....::::.... .. .....--~ .J'- ..'. 'z:t:.v
':...,.. ,:.l...> ..:::..... _.......... , -..is-- ......../. ...... i C J
. 'I ' -::;..0'....'..... ".' ~ ~~
: : : : ~.....,..., ...,.:-- ....,..:',.," 00'
.;,..~, , ;..~ ....::;::,;-- '.....~.::....., ~
i-V )-' ~ .....f.::.:,,~.... \l~'
1.,1.': .. ,......,
: I; '" ~._. ."'.,..........._....
:..~ r'. i
: : ....,
. . r"L...-.'
',1
~
..:
...
.,'
.,'
- :f
; 3..
6 ',,\'.
:. ~ ~'"
~ ~ ; ".
10
G'<-
~?o~o
.....
~
Iii
~
'"
....
>-
...l
j::
~:l
><:~
00
~z
~ii2
o
tiJa~
~~o
lI)....::!;
..
"
v
...
o "
o _
~ Q
~
-
~
~
'0
~
..c
CI)
c::~
o
..
~
..
CI)
\0
~
-
~
~
"C
~
..c
CI)
u
..c
..
..
~
ell
c::
,9
..
~
u
.Q
-
~
~
eJ.)
c::
'C
o
..
'2
o
~
c::
'C
o
.0
'0
c::
~
>.
..c::
0..
~
\..0
eJ.)
o
0..
o
..
u
..c
..
eJ.)
c::
.~
o
..c
en
c::
~
0..
~~
C;)>
-.i-
u
\..0
~
eJ.)
~
YOROSYSTEMSwc~
'-;'
~
~
.',
.... ~> ~ "'..
i-i ~ 'l:;!j L ~ '<",-
'....,. 1IIIlillllJ tl.l ~ . .'V<~
,. I "",'I I " . : . "
L..; "'111""0' 0' ' ,
:: I 1IIIIiI'I'!-...., '\
" 1.1t .., VI ',.1
'.... . .;,....",. <:> " r, .
;; ,'::\\",: .. ",~~\.,;\ .... . \
;"j '!'''''''', ~. .......0._ , '\\' \ \
: l 1"11'11111\ '......<',.. :. \\\\'\ ...
...., I "II"'" \ . . \ \' \'\ ... i,
L.l I / \\,,\,::t1: I ""..,..::;"'."'''<'''..... '\\ '\\\\ ~ \\
' ; ''''',,11./ '<;" '\,\ \." \. I'.
.'..J i I ',,111."1. 1/ i. ''''~\ \\" ...\\
; ; " "",'Iz.. ,.\ ',. '". \\ \\ ".,
' , 'I I ','",,1..., . '., \\ '\
1-"; / 1 I \ \l\\"'~il: '\ "'.il' \~\ ,\ \\ '\ \.
fi , J '"'' :\. '. :3 _\~\\\ \\ \\\. ...~~ '
' ,I "",,,'\, in ~', ..,./., \ ~'( '\
"," """';";" ~, ",'. \,'" \\f1, ".
"" 111'''''\' r i'! c 'v-",. ,,'" '" ..\
hi I ,".III\,l ,\ iiJ." ; E- "'\ ".*' " " '..
' 'I IIblH' , "'~'. " <( M.I. ..~\\\ \ \\
~...+ I \'11111\1\',1 10~-1 il' ~ \\ \. '\', \. \,
: : I. hlllll \ I ri:G, ~ ,.!; '~~'... \ \ \ \ ',,,\ '\.
h, l · "I""'!!,' , !:;!. "'..,l 11- / U ''::", \, \, \, '~'
' ;, . :'~<t- '~~.::--"." \;:i., ~\ ,\\ f\ .....
1"'[ I : t\1::lUill~!B/ - '"1"'\ g '0 "'\\\ \'\io \ \....
HI.., ':"/::"1 I, L-.Ji \~, ",__....". '{\~" ,\, \~\,
; ; I "'/11'1" 'I -, \ II\. 0. \ (\ ~\ .... '\\\"'~ \"
.,--, , '111"'11' \ 'I ~. I I'," 0 " \);h '. I,ll, '''' ,;.,
i-!i ::::I::'::~\'I o~h25 \"'5\ "':\~,\i~."~~,
Qt-! : ,1'::::::'1" \ 1 \ iI--~ ---.Ii.~. 6 \ "I~\\,~\ \~ ~ ~ ~
,5L..~ 1\ .~I IJ,111~\\;\ \ \ IICL~~/'I) "l~.... . \ .~~~\\ \, \.'.Vc .
"', 'I '0: I, " ,/ i:i.. -. , \\', "A
~'\..+ \, i /111 \II~~,.,,;.,' " J _., /<.:.~ Q '\ .....~ \ \~\\\\\~, \" \ (.
... . I '/ '" .', ....~ _ '___ OJ,.. '" I' \ , " ,
u';..:' \ 1,1 ,....~~\~\ -~ ~-'---_--=~E-o.". ... ll.o,.....\ ....\\,\..\'.... '..,.
. ,; dll<:,\::;.~:.;,~,.,. -- .0....\ ~ -. I '\I'I'., \',,-_
H I I 0,,,>: "'--.... ~ \"'" '" .. \ \\"l' \/ ... (\:.
" 1\' '.::-",--- .. . \\". i2 \ \ \"~ '" ... "",
;., I I ; . ':::. " 0 " '\\,\,. a \ I, '\~\, \. '\. ""'"
!, , \ ! 0: ~ '" , "H' I \"', \\ \ " . ".
;'-r I' ,\, ~'15, ... \\Jo"'':' ". ,.,\. , "... \, ,o.~ '
'. I ~' \ .. '. J:: ec. ~'-"~""o , ," '., I .
H f \ ~or::~,\, ~ ,.: .;<<'~:;,~~~.".... ,)~~,\ .\. \ .\
. , I \ T~ VI, ~---- ""''''".. ~. r.,~, '. \
L, ,,; \ ""~' ______ _ ,:::::..........._, ,'''l ~,~ "~'.,. 1',' . ( >: ::..\
. I " , ""_.. .._. _' ., '" ,~. \.. \ \
", ""'" -- . .... ....----. ~ ----"y' \ --'. . \ '. .
H: -'" -- .,} !";L _ ~\ "'I I ,'. ~",,-~::\:~,,,_{\,_,,,_\. ':'_..'\.....~\._._._..._ ._..\,~ \
i ; , ... '" -", __ "" '/ . '~. ',\. "'. _"
.i'..~IJ \ !::l S' ::l..i \ If' 1 \ 'I ',' \ \ '''" \ ....
. . . ~ . ~~-=, " \ " I '.
.L..~ -1'-" -, : \! ~ ~Vl', \, ~ I, I \ ~ \ ....~Iu._~ "T:.,.. '\ \ '"
: J : I '\ z ~,J '_ .-.."'t..;,.\ \ \ .t-"~l I ., .... \
' . ", " -, -" I _ __ ... _. .
i"It.~. ~il ,! \:3 './ ..j ,~","r\ \ \,""', .J If, 0'1 \
; , . ' . \ " /, I," ",.j" I \ .../, " I"., / " I
,.1, -". . . , !:;! .... I ,I ./.,,, I I ...., . '\ I , I'" / i
,I, ,.. .. '; \. __ ,.,....// I ~.\" \ " \ I I I I /.;.' , }.
i- ..{, , , ".... .: .... - - .... \ \ \ \ ) I \ I /:i.. ~,.'
. . '. ~.. I '. I .. . , I '" ".
1 ; ^..t '~.;.. \ \ I\. .\""', \ 1"1 I I I ,)', ~/.f';' ...""...
;'-;' I II ::. ~.... \ \. ,,' 1 . "I' ,. / ) )_.... '/ _ I'" ....,."..
. ., . ~ \"\ , .......~-~.....-...::;. ,.' .
; : I 1 .. ..... '/ I..", /__ ,,__-'.... .,"
'-., '. ~.. .,", \ \ II I _ '_-"""-",,,, ~ "'_ ,,_' ./';
. . I ' -'., , ~~.., \ I I /', ~_?"'__",~_ '''''_..' .
' , . , / ......~'.., \, " ''<;<~~5-''''",,,,- 0""" _/.
''''. / I / "\', '~?",,,,,~ ...", .,..,
' ", - , I I" , .......,. "'--="" "''''_ ...,':....,
"..,. I ~ / " ...."'" ~ ....-?......., _ ,.'?'.,..
. , , / ~-~ ~~.' ..' .....
' " . I \ "'-"'_ '_<.' .0_ / .
t"; I ,~". ''''-0';"-,-,,, .."::>' .
! ': .!.c,.... *:7-':..,.:::...-
P: i.j ~'" }::~~,.".
tV. i * ""......... ; \.
,..1,.... ", h 11
:/: .,.,.,.,..."." ~
.'...! '.; '\
: . ~..
,0.,
~ g
'" :...
.... Z
;.- '0
..J:Ju
~~~
~z~
oC2~
i:Go:i
~~o
Oi:G
UlO::Eo
6~.1
(I)'" I
I
~
~
."
Q ..
Q ~
) 0
~,
'l. r:::S)
0'\<C.
<(\0
0~~'
.,;....:. ..-
. ....
, "
"
"
,.'
G'<-
_<,\\0
~
~
-
Qj
~
'C
Ctl
..c::
CIl
l::
,9
-
Ctl
-
CIl
fa
l'
-
~
'C
Ctl
..c::
CIl
4)
..c::
-
-
Ctl
l::
.9
-
u
4)
,!::
'C
~
o
c;::;
....
4)
-
Ctl
~
'C
l::
:3
8
o
V')
e
:3
OJ)
ti:
HYOROSYSTEMSwc__
,
, .
2.4 Contamination Investigation
2.4,1 Methods
Several techniques were employed to delineate the source, nature, and extent of
contamination at this site. These included:
· Conducting a soil gas survey to identify the potential contaminant sources and
areal extent of contamination;
· Drilling 5 borings to collect split spoon samples for lithologic descriptions and
headspace jlaboratory analysis;
· Analysis of headspace on split spoon samples obtained during drilling to
screen samples for the areal and vertical extent of contamination;
· Laboratory analysis of selected split spoon samples for total petroleum
hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis to confirm and quantify areal and vertical extent
of contamination;
· Installation of 5 monitoring wells to determine the presence of free product
and to collect ground water samples;
· Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples to determine presence of
dissolved phase hydrocarbons; and
· Tightness testing of product lines and underground tanks,
Each of these investigative techniques are described in detail below,
2.4.1.1 Soil Gas Survey
HYDROSYSTEMS conducted a two-phased soil gas survey to attempt to identify pot~ntial
contaminant sources and the areal extent of contamination in the unsaturated zone. The
presence of significant organic vapors in the shallow soils are often good indicator of
contaminant sources and extent. An initial survey consisting of a rough 50-foot grid across
12
HYOROSYSTEMSwc__
. .
the entire site was conducted on August 28, 1989, A follow-up survey which included more
closely-spaced points along piping runs and other potential contaminant sources was
performed on September 19, 1989.
The soil gas surveys consisted of the installation of 51, 1.5-inch diameter, 4-foot deep auger
holes at the locations shown in Figure 6, After installation, the opening of each hole was
sealed at the surface to retain any volatilized gases for sampling, Soil gas data were
collected using a Foxboro Century 128 Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) and Gas
Chromatograph (GC). A O,25-inch diameter teflon probe was inserted into each hole to
measure the concentration of organic vapors within the boring. The OVA can detect
volatile organics to 0.2 parts-per-million (PPM) total organic vapors,
2.4.1.2 Boring Installations and Soil Sampling
On September 1, 1989, three borings MW-l, MW-2, and MW-3 were installed at the
locations shown in Figure 5, MW-1 was sited to provide data on upgradient conditions,
while MW-2 and MW-3 were sited to provide information in the areas of likely contaminant
sources, the fuel unloading rack and piping and the kerosene UST. These borings were
drilled using a 7 5/8-inch hollow stem auger to refusal at the bedrock surface (for MW-2
and MW-3) or until an appreciable water bearing zone was encountered. Split spoon
samples were collected at 5-foot intervals to refusal.
These split spoon samples were screened with the OVA to assist in identifying the areal and
vertical extent of contamination, Soil samples were placed in a I-quart glass jar and
warmed for 20 minutes prior to analysis, The OVA was then used to measure organic vapor
concentrations in the headspace above the soil samples (Table 1). Selected split spoon
samples which showed the highest concentrations of organic vapors were then retained for
laboratory analysis,
Two supplemental borings, MW-4 and MW-5, were installed at the site on October 3, using
the same methods described above. These borings were sited to better delineate ground
water flow directions and to identify the extent of the water quality degradation shown in
MW-2,
13
YDROSYSTEMS INC
.
.
Table 1 - Headspace Analyses of Split Spoon Samples, GOCO "76", Shadwell, V ~
Boring
Soil Sample
Depth (ft.)
Total Organic Vapor
Concentration (ppm)
TB-1 4 0,6
9 0.5
14 1.0
19 1.6
24 1.5
TB-2 4 0,7
9 > 1000 ·
14 200
19 180
TB-3 4 14
9 58
14 12
TB-4 4 0,0
9 0.7
14 0.2
TB-5 4 6.8
9 0,8
14 0,2
· Sam pie retained for laboratory TPH analysis
2.4,1.3 Monitoring Well Installation
Upon completion of all borings, 2-inch PVC monitoring wells were installed. Although
ompletion details differed for each well, typically 10-20 feet of O,Ol-inch slotted screen with
n appropriate length of riser pipe were installed in each boring, The well screen was
acked with clean gravel extending to at least one foot above the well screen. Each well
as completed with a bentonite seal, grout backfill, locking cap, and protective casing or
anhole covering, Well construction details for all wells are provided in Appendix 1.
14
VOROS YSTEMS IHe
Gi
>
C'O
L.
C)
-
0
IiI .... CD
CD
-' CI) 0)
<t u.. "0
0 0 w
U) v .1
~.
....
.....
...,..... ." ..............................,................_,."..,..,'~,-..+
.,.. .....,...~!:................,..... ........ -:'
~
.~
....
......
., 6
\ g::+,
\N\
. . i
': ': ;S
~ ~ ~
\. \ ~
\ .:~+
\ \
" ..
\\
\ ~\
\ ~+
.. "
\\
\.
lI:!'+
W)\
)
//
,..,.' 15
~
c(
a:
mj)
.,:::::;:~::::::~.+.:::~::..:~:~) ~
CIl E
o J~ 0
ci + c::::2 !: .. . r:ii::J
~ .
,
,
..............................~........................................
c;;l
.......8+
. 0
<Do.
~+
~,
-I:
2:
fi
. ,
li
c.. Doc.
OlliE
~ .~ ~ 6:
~,q
, ..
: ~
, ....
:~
;1[
, '
, '"
1j
~+
o
,
II"'!
.--j
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
+ :
,
q
~+
o
o~+
~+
~+
o
lfi
,-:-..-
f")
C;J
0'-
'"
o
3.-
o
o
0'-
'"
I I
I I
J I
i i
i i
, ,
!!
ii
I I
i i
i i
II
J I
i i
J I
!!
II
II
i i U)
:::.::
ii 0
<x:
i i t=
Ii c
ii ~
II 5
i i <x:
c::
! f
!!
i f
!
i
i
!
~!
ffi . i
~ i
~ i
~ i
w .
1=
oCt
....
(J)
IX:
IX:
IX:
~
U.
o
lfi+
4D
~
Q
~
C
<<l
I-
i
I
I
J
c::~
.9
.....
~
.....
CI.l
\0
r--.
-
'0
~
'0
~
..c
CI.l
c1)
..c
.....
.....
i;i;l
VI
c::
,9
.....
~
~
.....
c::
c1)
u
c::
o
u
.....
o
0..
~
:>
u
'2
~
~
o
'0
c1)
.....
::1
VI
~
c1)
E
'0
c::
~
VI
c::
.9
.....
~
u
o
-..
bO
c::
.-
0..
a
~
en
>'.
~$
::1
en _~
en"='
~ ""
bO~
'0
:::: ca
o ..c'
CI.lCl.l
\J:S
o
.....
::1
bO
~
,YOROSYSTEMS INC
j j
. ,
2.4.1.4 Well Development And Ground Water Sampling
On September 8, 1989 MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 were developed and purged by bailing a
minimum of 5 well volumes of water, or until dry, from each well using a teflon bailers
dedicated to each well. After purging, groundwater samples were collected using the teflon
bailers, Additionally, each well was checked for the presence of free product both before
and after purging with a clear acrylic bailer.
A groundwater sample was also collected at this time from the well supplying the store
located to the rear of the property, as shown on Figure 4. This well is a 55-foot deep drilled
well with an unknown length of steel casing in the overburden, The well was purged from
a faucet in the well pit for approximately 20 minutes at 7.5 gpm prior to sampling.
Monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 were developed and sampled following these same
procedures on October 9, 1989, A second round of samples was also collected from MW-1,
MW-2, and MW-3 at this time,
Samples were placed in clean glass jars, sealed, and preserved with ice during shipping.
Chain-of-custody procedures were also followed during sample collection and transport.
2.4.1.5 Laboratory Analyses of Soils and Groundwater
All laboratory analyses were performed by Central Virginia Laboratories of Lynchburg,
Virginia (CVLC), The groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum
hydrocarbons (TPH) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, (BTEX), Since most soil
samples showed low levels of organic vapors based on headspace screening with the OVA, .
only one sample which showed the highest organic vapor readings was retained for
confirmatory laboratory analysis. The sample from MW-2 collected at the lO-foot depth was
forwarded to CVLC for TPH analysis.
2.4.2 Vapor Phase - Contamination in the Unsaturated Zone
Contamination in the unsaturated zone appears to be limited based on the results of the soil
as survey, headspace analysis of split spoon samples collected during drilling, and
aboratory analysis of selected split spoon samples for TPH,
16
YDROSYSTEMS we
"
Results of the soil gas survey is provided in Figure 6 and Appendix 2. Although this survey
reveals several areas of appreciable (> 100 ppm) organic vapor concentrations, most appear
to be related to minor surface spillage from dispensing equipment or site runoff. Elevated
soil gas readings near the diesel pumps and gas pumps appear to be due to minor spillage
associated with dispensing equipment. Elevated readings along the edge of the gravel area
south of the unloading rack and in the low lying area near the former railroad station and
Rou te 250 appear to be due to runoff from the gravel parking lot area. The elevated
readings to the west of the building and near the kerosene pump appear related to the wet
conditions in this area, which result from the surface seepage of contaminated groundwater.
rIne elevated soil gas readings near the loading/unloading rack appear to be the most
notable contamination in the unsaturated zone, Since the lines tested tight, it is likely that
these elevated readings are due to surface spillage in this area,
Results of the organic vapor headspace analyses performed on the split spoon soil samples
collected during drilling are provided in Table 1 and indicate that contamination in the
unsaturated zone is minimal. No appreciable organic vapors were detected in samples from
MW-1, MW-4, or MW-5, Based on the low levels found at depth in MW-5, it appears that
the high soil gas survey readings near the railroad tracks and route 250 are surficial and very
localized, Near the kerosene tank in MW-3, heads pace concentrations were slightly above
background, but well below levels indicative of releases from this UST, The only
appreciable organic vapor headspace concentrations occurred in MW-2 near the
loading/unloading rack, where concentrations in excess of 1000 ppm were recorded in the
soil sample collected at 8,5-10 feet in depth,
This soil sample at 10 foot depth in MW-2, which showed the highest headspace readings
of any sample collected on site, was retained for laboratory analysis of TPH, Laboratory
analysis of this sample revealed TPH level of only 35 ppm, well below the SWCB's action
level of 100 ppm for soils. Thus, other than some surface spillage in the immediate vicinity
of the unloading rack, contamination in the unsaturated zone appears minimal.
2.4.3 Free Product Phase - Contamination on the Water Table
No evidence of free product was observed during any phase of this investigation, which
suggests a diffuse or slow source is responsible for the groundwater quality degradation. No
free product was observed in soils during drilling or monitoring well installation. All
monitoring wells were also checked for free product using an acrylic bailer prior to well
development and each sampling event. No free product was observed on any monitoring
17
YOROSYSTEMS INC_
wells, Additionally, visual observation of water level tapes indicate that no free product is
present in the store well either,
2.4.4 Dissolved Phase - Contamination in the Ground Water
Results of laboratory analyses of TPH and BTEX performed on ground water samples
collected from the monitoring wells, the well supplying the store, and from the intermittent
stream at the downstream border of the property boundary are provided in Table 2. Also
provided for comparison are analytical results for a sample the store well collected on June
29, 1989 by the SWCB, All samples showed nondetectable levels of TPH (< 1 ppm), with
the exception of MW-4, which reported a value of 1.4 ppm, This TPH value is believed to
be an outlier, since all BTEX components in this well were below detection, and no other
indication of contamination (sheen, odor) was observed in this well.
Significant levels of contamination were observed in the store well and MW-2, located near
the loading/unloading rack, Contaminant levels MW-2 exceeded drinking water limits by
100's of times for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and approached the limit for xylene.
Contaminant levels in the store well were not quite as severe, but still exceeded drinking
water limits for benzene by a factor of 100.
These high contaminant levels in MW-2 indicate a source at the loading/unloading rack.
The lower, but still elevated, levels observed in the store well appear to be due to
contaminants spreading in the unsaturated zone or in the groundwater during times of
recharge to the site, The flat water table gradient and soil structure observed in the
saprolitic soils may account for this spreading in an apparently "upgradient" direction,
Low levels of contamination were also observed in the upgradient well, MW-l. Although
much lower than that observed in MW-2 or the store well, drinking water standards for
benzene were still exceeded by lO's of times, As with the store well, these levels are
attributed to spreading in the unsaturated zone, or due to the flat water table gradient in
this area,
MW-4, MW-5 and a sample collected at the property boundary from the intermittent stream
along the C&O railroad tracks show nondetectable levels of all BTEX constituents. This
indicates that the contamination is confined to the local area of the loading/unloading rack,
and is not moving off-site via ground water or surface water pathways.
18
YOROSYSTEMS INC_
::E
<t: -
lJ..l 0 0 0 0
~ C! C! C! C! C!
~ - 0 0 0 0
(/) V V V V V
- - - -
1""\ 1""\ 1""\ 1""\
...... ...... ...... ......
~ -l ..... 0 CO 0 r- 0 0'\ 0
~ C'l or. 0'\ C'l 0 r- 0 CO
0 -l C! r- ~ - "! C! 0 \C ~
8 lJ..l - 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 0
U') ~ v
........
~
~
l~ - -
0 0 0 0
- ~ ~ 0 C! 0 0 C!
- - 0 0 ci 0
...... ::Et!. v v v v v
<
>
- ........
'i) C1)
u
~ c:: 0'1
'0 ~I ~ eo
~ 1 ... 0 0 0 0 .........
~ c ~ C! 0 C! C! 0'1
..c .........
tI:l ::E~ 0 0 0 0 0
v v v v
CI "0
,9 ~
....
5 ()
tI:l ~ 0'\
. '0 '" r-l
\0 1""\,........ C'l - - u C1)
r- I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en ....
. ~
~ ~ 0 C! C! C! C! C! C! C! 0 C1) ~
0 ~~ - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ='
~ v v v v v C;; QO
> c::
,-
0 '" ..\I::
C1)
~ ~ c:
"i:
C1) .2 Q
0.
e C'll- 0-.- '"
,..\I:: 0 r- r- 1""\ 0'1 co \C eo~
~ ~ ~ C! ~ 'C! C! co "1 C! ~ C! .........
~e:. - N N ~ or. r- eo -
'" ............:1
~ v O'IU
~ "0 ~
~ C1)
.... -
"0 () en
C ~ 'i)
='
0 0 >
'" TO 0'1 r- N 0 N N r- () C1) 0'1
0 I QO ~ ~ 0 C! 0 0 0 0 en ...:I co
~ 0. 0 C! C! 0 C! 0 C! C! ~ .... .........
'- ::E2 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 c: 0'1
0 - 0 0.
V V ~ N
'" S c: .........
C1) ~ "8 \C
'" en
>. "0
c;; en ~ ~
~ ....
CI c: ()
< o:u 0 ~
........ "~ u
- '0
~ E N ........ "0
0 C S u
0 ...... .-.. 0 "-
E .... C! r- =' Q.)
Q.) s c.
s s .-.. ci ='
.8 ~ :J II"'l ...-. c;; ";< s
=' VI 0' .-..
IJ..l 0 C1) C! > o:u o:u
cu C1) c: C! 0 c :E en
...:I ~ >. '0 0 N C1) 0 '" ~
lJ..l ... t: .0 ~ N - C1)
0 ... ...-. ...-. 0.< u
::E .... C1) cu C1) I::
N ~ () C1) C1) VI 0.0... ~
0... I:: c: .0 C1) ~~
C1) <t: =' 0 C1) C1) c: CI)
~ ... >.
:c ~ QO "0 N ~ C1)
C1) I:: '0 ..c >.
~ <t: ~ 0 >. C1) - ---
0... ~ :I: ~ f-o ~ X - N .....
...-. --- i
YDROSYSTEMS ""~
. ,
3.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
This section of this report defines the risk the contamination observed on-site poses to the
environment and human health, In conducting this risk assessment, HYDROSYSTEMS
defines:
· What pathways exist along which the contaminants may migrate
· Who/what are the potential receptors along each pathway
· At what levels could these receptors be exposed and, given these levels, what is the
risk to the receptor,
· Do these risks warrant corrective actions to reduce or eliminate the risks
The following discussion evaluates the above items based on each likely pathway for
contaminant migration, Since no significant levels of soil contamination or free product
have been found on-site, migration via the ground water pathway appears to be the most
significant cause for concern,
,1 Man-Made Pathways
wo man-made pathway exist on site which may be contributing to the spreading of
ontaminants, As shown in Figure 3, a 12-inch conduit carries surface water runoff from the
ack area past the store well and discharges to the intermittent stream near the railroad
racks. Contaminated runoff carried by this line could be spreading to the well area, if a
reach exists in this line. Additionally, although a drain line exits from the store well pit,
o outfall could be found, This drain line may join the surface water runoff line. If so,
lockage present now or previously in the surface drain line may result in a direct conduit
or contaminants to travel from the rack area to the well pit. Further investigation of this
athway is warranted,
second man-made pathway which may be contributing to the spreading of the
ontamination is the septic system, Contaminated groundwater derived from the store. well
i used for sanitary purposes and discharged to a leachfield on the north-northwest side of
testation. The resultant discharge has the potential to further spread the hydrocarbon
ontamination to the groundwater and possibly to surface waters via the seeps,
20
HYDROSYSTEMS INC
" .
The potential for contaminant migration or impacts via other man-made pathways at the site
are nonexistent. All utilities serving the site are overhead, thus no underground conduits
exist for contaminant migration,
3,2 Groundwater Pathway
Given the significant levels of BTEX components in the groundwater near MW-2 and the
store well, the potential migration of contaminated groundwater poses the greatest risks to
receptors near this site. The primary receptor of concern is the store well which has already
shown to be impacted. Described in Section 2.1 (and shown on Figure 2), other nearby
residential wells include the Michie residence upslope and approximately 400 feet to the
east of the property, the Stone-Robinson Elementary School Well located approximately 800
feet to the southwest of the property, the Lang residence located approximately 1200 feet
to the east-southeast of the site near the Stone-Robinson school, and wells located at the
Shadwell Food Store, located approximately 800 feet northeast of the site at the intersection
of Routes 250 and 22.
Given the ground water flow directions determined in Section 2.3, only one of these wells
should potentially be affected from contamination at the site. The Michie residence located
upslope and to the east of the site is upgradient of the site, and therefore should not be
impacted by conditions at the site, The wells located at the Shadwell Food Store are
located across the apparent ground water divide formed by the discharge area along the
topographically low area along the railroad tracks, Therefore, these wells would not be
impacted by flow from the site either, The Stone-Robinson school, southwest of the site,
is laterally downgradient from the site. However, a the west-northwest gradient toward the
intermittent stream makes impacts to this well unlikely. Additionally, MW-4, located along
the property boundary directly between the contaminated area and the school well shows
o impacts.
e one residential well which potentilally could be impacted by contaminated ground water
n the site is the Lang residence located west of the site in the topographically low area
long the railroad tracks. Although groundwater on the site flows west-northwest. and
ppears to discharge to the intermittent stream, groundwater which does not discharge
during dry periods, for example) would be expected to flow west paralIelling the
ntermittent stream. Although this is a possible pathway, exposure via this pathway is
nlikely for two reasons. First, MW-5 which is sited to monitor this flowpath, reveals no
ontamination, This indicates that contamination has not yet even traveled to the site
oundary. Based on the suspected groundwater discharge to the seepage area at the
21
YDROSYSTEMS INC
northwestern corner of the station building and intermittent stream, contamination may
never travel to the site boundary, Second, based on groundwater flow velocities provided
in Section 2.3, and assuming no attenuation, it would take on the order of 2.2 - 60 years to
travel the 1200 feet to this well. Continued monitoring of MW-5 could serve as an indicator
of such migration.
3.3 Surface Water Pathway
The potential for contaminant migration and impacts to receptors via a surface water
pathway exists, but appears limited for a number of reasons. The only receptor of surface
water discharges is the intermittent stream itself and eventually the Rivanna River. No
human receptors exist since this intermittent stream is not used for human consumption.
Although human receptors are not of concern, pathways do exist for potentially
contaminated surface water exiting the site. Pathways include: (1) runoff of surface water
from the site (2) groundwater seepage which surfaces at the front of the building entering
the intermittent stream, and (3) discharge of contaminated groundwater from the rack area
directly to the stream. Although these pathways exist, sampling of the intermittent stream
shows no impacts to the stream. All TPH and BTEX components were nondetectable in
one grab sample collected at the downstream property boundary. Either no contaminated
groundwater is reaching this stream, or if it is, the BTEX components are volatilizing in this
surface flow. Continued monitoring of this stream may be warranted to determine if any
contaminants are exiting the site via the surface water pathway,
3.4 Air Pathwa~
Since no free product or significantly contaminated soils occur on site, the accumulation or
migration of significant concentrations of organic vapors is unlikely, The existing station
tructure has no basement, and there are no nearby residences in which vapor accumulation
ould be of concern, OVA readings taken in the ambient atmosphere in the spill area also
how no detectible levels of organic vapors. Therefore there is no risk to any potential
eceptors via any air pathway.
22
YDRQSYSTEMS INe
,I '.
4.0 REMEDIATION ASSESSMENT
Based on investigations performed to date, remedial measures do not appear to be
warranted for this site. No significant hydrocarbons in soils, vapor phase contamination, or
free product occurs on the site, Thus, corresponding remedial measures such as soil
excavation and removal, soil venting, biodegradation, or free product recovery are not
applicable or necessary. With some improvements in product handling on site,
recommended in section 5.0, natural biodegradation should be sufficient to remove the low
levels of soil contamination observed,
Although remediation of the contaminated groundwater is feasible, such work does not
appear to be warranted for several reasons. First, the quality problems at the station well
have been in existence for at least 10 years, Although ground water contamination
apparently has existed throughout this time period, HYDROSYSTEMS' work to date shows
contamination to be localized in the vicinity of the unloading rack and store well. Thus, it
appears that contamination has not moved significantly, and is therefore not likely to
migrate and negatively impact nearby residential wells. Further monitoring and the
recommendations outlined in Section 5,0 would confirm this assumption,
Second, other than the store well, no other receptors exist which would likely be impacted
by the contamination on the site, As described in Sections 2,1 and 3,2, although the Lang
residential well is located downgradient of the site, impacts to this well are unlikely due to
a combination of the distance to the well and that the contaminated groundwater appears
to be discharging to the intermittent stream on the rear portion of the property.
Likewise, although the Stone-Robinson School is laterally downgradient, impacts to this well
are unlikely since groundwater flows more due west, along or discharging to the intermittent
stream along the railroad, In either case, monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 located along
the downgradient boundary of the property, and one additional well placed near the station
building could be used to monitor for and detect any such migration toward these users.
Ifwater quality degradation were to be observed in these wells, appropriate remedial actions
could be pursued as needed at that time.
If required, a remediation scheme using ground water pumping/collection followed by
treatment and discharge to surface water would most likely be used at this site, Since
~round water is shallow (< 11') in the most highly contaminated portion of the site, a
~roundwater collection system composed of horizontal drains may be applicable. In shallow
~ater table situations, such systems are often more cost-effective to install and operate than
!Pumping well systems, If use of horizontal drains is not possible, a pumping well system
k:ould be installed. This system would most likely be a 2-well system, using the existing well
23
YDROSYSTEMS INC_
." ,
supplying the store as one pumping well. An additional pumping well would be installed
near the unloading rack in the most highly contaminated area, Pumping rates of these wells
would be determined based on an analysis of pumping test data.
Contaminated groundwater collected by a drain or pumping well system would then require
treatment, Air stripping is clearly the technology of choice for treatment and removal of
volatile organic compounds at these levels from water, Sizing of an air stripping unit would
be based on expected pumping rates from the recovery wells, Depending upon the influent
water quality, an oil/water separator may be installed in-line ahead of the air stripping unit.
After treatment, water would be discharged to the intermittent stream bounding the site,
since no sewerage facilities serve the area, This discharge would most likely be conducted
under an Virginia Pollution Abatement permit (VP A), Depending upon the removals
achieved with air stripping and the effluent limitations imposed on this discharge, a carbon
adsorption finishing unit may be required for final treatment prior to discharge.
5.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
As described in Section, 4,0, ground water remediation at this site does not appear to be
necessary at this time, based on the relatively immobile nature of the contamination and the
lack of receptors likely to be impacted, However, further work should be performed to
define and eliminate potential sources of contamination and to ensure that contamination
which is present does not migrate off-site and impact potential receptors.
Work recommended to adequately characterize the source of contamination and limit such
sources includes:
· Investigate the line carrying runoff from the gravel area near the unloading rack to
ensure this is 'not connected to or otherwise a source of contamination in the well pit.
· Discontinue use of the store well. Drill a replacement well in the vicinity of MW-4
to provide water supply for the station,
· Excavate and remove surficial petroleum-contaminated soils near the fuel
loading/unloading rack, Pave this area with concrete to eliminate continued
contamination due to product spillage, Berm or slope this area to contain runoff,
which should be directed through an oil/water separator prior to discharge,
24
YOROSYSTEMS INC_
. " . ~,
Work recommended to ensure that the contamination present does not migrate off-site and
impact potential receptors includes:
· Monitor water quality in all monitoring wells, the store well, and the intermittent
stream semiannually for a minimum of two years, Samples should be analyzed for
BTEX components, and results provided to the SWCB. At the end of this two year
period, provide the SWCB with a summary of all data collected to date and
recommendations for further monitoring and disposition of the site,
· If significant water quality degradation is observed in any monitoring well, which
indicates that the contamination is migrating, implement ground water remediation
as discussed in Section 4.0, Provide the SWCB a corrective action plan prior to
implementing this work,
Other housekeeping recommendations which are largely unrelated to the ground water
contamination on-site include:
· Remove and properly dispose of the abandoned USTs currently stockpiled at the rear
of the site,
· Excavate and properly dispose surficial petroleum-contaminated soils in the vicinity
of the gas, diesel, and kerosene pumps, and along the northeast corner of the gravel
parking lot.
25
YDROSYSTEMS wc_
. .. I. ~
unQn GDeD, INC. r'#
p, O. BOX 1404
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA.
22902
~-i::'~ ('Ii... Th.......-;r ;4':": i' ~:;I'!:' ';,~tl
n:"T"\O'.;. ~ ~~.... r; '~ :-~, j;,"" ~ ~
fh" '1;". ,...... ~ ~ ;i."..._~,.
February 16, 1993
.. 1 t"
~. t ("1 } '"~~<)
, . '
;::;1 ':':'; n':"" ~ ;':("; ~-),Q n; .
U L __It ;,,, a... .::; ~J~' 1'-)' "'II
Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg
County of Albemarle
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va. 22902-4596
Re: Application for Jurisdictional Area Amendment
Dear Mr. Cilimberg:
It is our desire not to have our application for a
Jurisdictional Area Amendment deferred again. If Mr. Booth
should need another delay, we feel that our circumstances
warrant that we be given seperate consideration.
If necessary, we would be willing to file a seperate
application, as the only reason we filed jointly was at Mr.
Booth's request.
As you know, our circumstances are quite different. We have
a documented problem with ground water on our site, and
desire to obtain potable water for our existing business.
Mr. Booth, on the other hand, would like a water tap for
possible future development of his site.
In light of our differing circumstances, we therefore
request that our application be given consideration at your
scheduled meeting on March 3, 1993.
If you have any questions, or need any further action from
us, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
#~m.~
Harry M. Montague
President, GOCO, Inc.
it-;/'
<f
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Ms, Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community Developmentdc
February 16, 1993
DATE:
RE:
JUl:"isdictional Area Request - David Booth
he attached has been received from Applied Technology and Engineering on
ehalf of David Booth regarding a well located on Mr, Booth's property on
oute 250 East. Mr, Booth sought this analysis as justification for his
equest to receive Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area
esignation for water only, As you can see, the tests of the existing on-site
ell indicate no petroleum hydrocarbons, but an unacceptable level of bacteria
or drinking water. I would appreciate your Department's review and comment
egarding this analysis as technical grounds for granting the jurisdictional
rea request, I would appreciate your response by Wednesday, February 24,
993, Much thanks for your cooperation.
@
Applied Technology and Engineering, P.C.
1115 5th Street S,W.
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-6465
Phone: (804)977-1498
Fax: (804) 977-6778
RECEIVED
fEB 0 3 1993
In llary 28, 1993
Mr David Booth
Tat ershall Farm
Ro Ite 3 Box 188
Ch rlottesville, V A 22903
Cl......,-'l:flg Den'\'
i :.~:~ ~~ _" v. 1'-,1.
Re: Sampling of well located on Tax Map 79 Parcel 19; Albemarle County, Virginia
De r Mr, Booth:
At our request, Applied Technology and Engineering, P.C. (AT &E) conducted sampling of the
we 1 located on Tax Map 79 Parcel 19; Albemarle County, Virginia.
Th primary objective of the sampling was to determine if there was evidence that the well has been
im acted by a release of petroleum products on the adjacent property.
A E personnel visited the site on January 25, 1993 to conduct the sampling, Prior to sampling,
dnt on the well was obtained, The depth to water was 8.6 feet. The depth of the well was 75
fee, The diameterof the casing was 6 inches. The length of the casing is unknown. The well is
not currently being used. ^ sample was obtained from the well. Since the well has been idle, a
pu lp down of the we II was conducted and an additional sample was taken. Thc objective of the
pu p down was to establish a now in the idle well and was not meant to assess the yield of the
we 1.
Sin e the well was larger and deeper than anticipated, the pump down test was somewhat limited.
At pumping rate of approximately 11 GPM the water depth dropped to approximately 27 feet and
ren ained at that depth over a three hour pump cycle.
Th samples wcrc analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPI-I) and Coliform. The coliform
test were nm to detclmine if the level of bacteria was acceptable as drinking water quality, The
res Its are as follows:
ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
WELL ON T,M, 79-19 ALBEMARLE COUNTY
Sample
TPH, mgll Coliform, total
Initial
a'ter pump down
o
o
fail
fail
Bas d on this testing there is no indication that the well has been impacted by thc release on the
adj~ cent property, Additional testing would be required to dctemline if thcre was a hydraulic
con ection between the contamination on the adjacent property and the well on this property. The
bac eria testing indicatcs that the water quality is not acceptable for drinking water.
t us know if you have any questions or comments or require any further assistance,
Sincerely, I /1//. .
~
J hn R. WaIenten, Vice President
vironmental Management and
egulatory Compliance
.. .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
v. Wayne Cilim~~, Director of Planning
Jo Higgins, Di~tor of Engineering
8 December 1992
Booth, David W./Sandra Andrews - Jurisdictional Area
Amendment
Attachment A, Page 3 - Kurt M. Gloeckner's letter dated 8 August
1992.
The second page of Mr. Gloeckner's letter mentions that some
wells have been closed, "such as stone Robinson School". This is
to clarify that this occurrence is entirely unrelated and should
not be inferred to substantiate any potential for general
groundwater contamination in the area. Stone Robinson had a
leaking heating fuel oil line that ran from an underground
storage tank to the boiler room. This has been appropriately
addressed to the SWCB per regulations governing underground
storage tank systems. Subsequently, a new well was provided to
serve the school. The new well is northeast of the school and is
tested quarterly with no problems. (Page 12, third paragraph of
this attachment does state that impact from this incident is
unlikely. )
This report does address "potential" groundwater issues. It does
not provide sufficient test data to substantiate actual
contamination.
JHI
,
a
~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
F bruary 11, 1993
vid W. Booth
. 3, Box 188
arlottesville, VA 22903
David W. Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum (Goco, Inc)
- Jurisdictional Area Amendment
Mr. Booth:
e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on
bruary 3, 1993, deferred the above-noted request to its meeting
March 3, 1993.
have any questions, please do not hesitate to
,~~
w~yn~ilimb
rector of PIa
& Community Development
/
Ella careyV
Sherwood E. Exum, President
.
/ -, I (-/ /\
O:stcibuted to Co~~'d~ ~':,:?'__~~' .~_~:~::,\
/~ /) .'-1.'7;7
i\ge;;d ~ ! t" ,., I, '-/.;::Jt" I .~)J
latter-sllall Far-.
Rt. 3 Box 188
Charlottesville. Virginia
22903
Ph: 804-971-5564
12/8/92
Cle k. Board of Supervlsors
40 Mcintire Road
Cha lottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
Re: Jurisdictional Area Amendment for David W. Booth/Sandra Andrews and
She wood Exum (6OCO. inc.) - Tax Map 79. Parcels 18 and 19
I w uld like to request a delay of the public hearing of the above referenced
ma er until February 1. 1993. This request for delay is to allow sufficient
tim to pursue further engineering studies of parcel 19.Tax Map 79.
Tha k you for your consideration in this matter.
David W. Booth
.
Jo
vistributed to Board: J~'2:-'WL.
Agenda Item No. ~c~_\_ub
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902.4596
(804) 2%.5823
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community I 1{}l U
Development U
October 23, 1992
E:
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA)
Jurisdictional Area Amendment for David W. Booth/Sandra
Andrews and Sherwood Exum (Goco, Inc) - Tax Map 79,
Parcels 18 and 19
he applicants, David W. Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum
Goco, Inc.), request JuriSdictional Area designation for water
nl. Booth/Andrews, owners of Tax Map 79, Parcel 19 which is
oned C-1 and developed with one dwelling unit, state a need for
new water source for possible commercial use because of
otential groundwater contamination from the adjacent Goco and
hadwell Store underground fuel tanks. Exum (Goco, Inc.), owner
f Tax Map 79, Parcel 18 which is zoned Rural Area and developed
ith the Goco station, states a need for a new water source due
o potential and actual groundwater contamination from fuel oil.
ocumentation has been provided by the applicants to verify these
roblems (Attachment A).
n November 6, 1991, the Board amended the Jurisdictional Area
oundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority to include
he Glenmore Planned Residential Development, allowing provision
f public water (as well as public sewer) to Glenmore at the
xpense of the developer (minutes attached). On December 18,
1991, the Board further amended the JuriSdictional Area
oundaries to incorporate all remaining properties as shown in
t e Comprehensive Plan as the Rivanna Village (minutes attached).
o June 3, 1992, the Board amended the Jurisdictional Area
b undaries to include the Stone Robinson School (No minutes
a ailable, however, the Clerk's records indicate no discussion
o curred).
M
Ibemarle County Board of Supervisors
age 2
ctober 23, 1992
he Comprehensive Plan, in the Village of Rivanna
ecommendations, says, "water lines should be sized to serve the
illage and Stone Robinson School only". with the development of
lenmore in the Village, a water line is being installed along
he Route 250 East corridor from the Urban Area to Glenmore.
ublic water, therefore, crosses or will be easily accessible to
number of parcels in this corridor (See attached map).
OMPREHENSIVE PLAN
his parcel is located in the Rural Areas as designated by the
omprehensive Plan. Regarding provision of pUblic utilities, the
omprehensive Plan is intentionally specific in objective and
trategies as to where and under what circumstances public
tilities should be made available (p. 146):
OBJECTIVE: Provide public water and sewer services to the
Urban Area and Communities.
STRATEGIES:
. Follow the boundaries of the designated Growth Areas in
delineating jurisdictional areas.
. Only allow changes in jurisdictional areas outside of
designated Growth Area boundaries in cases where the
property is: (1) adjacent to existing lines; and (2)
public health or safety is endangered.
rther, the Comprehensive Plan warns that "such utilities are
t to be extended to the Rural Areas as these services can
crease development pressures" (p. 146). This request appears
be consistent with the second strategy listed above. The
plicants have indicated quality problems in supporting
cumentation.
COMMENDATION
a general pOlicy, staff has advised that public utility
pacities should be reserved to support development of
signated growth areas. Past actions by the Board have
pically been to limit utility service outside the designated
owth areas. However, where properties have experienced
ality/quantity problems and are adjacent to existing lines, the
ard has granted jurisdictional area designation for water only
existin structures (again, this request is for water only).
.
lbemarle County Board of Supervisors
age 3
ctober 23, 1992
s Tax Map 79, Parcel 19 is underdeveloped, reasonable use of the
roperty as C-1 will likely involve new structures. Therefore,
ater only to existing structures would not be sufficient for C-1
see Staff would recommend proceeding to public hearing for
ater onl designation for Tax Map 79, Parcel 19 and water only
o existin structures for Tax Map 79, Parcel 18 based on
ocumented and potential water quality problems. Planning staff
ill have the Engineering Department review technical
ocumentation for any comment regarding its content before the
ublic hearing.
C/jcw
David Booth
Sherwood Exum
Bill Brent
Jo Higgins
..
A'ITACHMENT A, PAGE I
Tatter-shall Far-ID
Rt. 3 Box 1 88
Charlottesville. Virginia
22903
Ph: 804-971-5564
April 24. 1992
RECEIVED
OCT 2 6 1992
Pianning Oept.
V, Wayne Cilimberg
D rector of Planning &
C(mmunity Development
4( 1 McIntire Road
Clarlottesville, Va. 22901-4596
Rl: Booth/Exum Application to amend the Service Authority
J\risdictional Area
D!ar Mr. Cilimberg:
T' e following itemized information is provided to assist you with
y ur November 4, 1992 report to the Board of Supervisors regarding
01 r request to include parcel 18 & 19, tax map 79 in the Service
A1 thority Jurisdictional Area.
1, Booth parcel 19 is down gradient of the adjecent Shadwell
store underground fuel tanks to the West and up gradient of
the GOCO fuel storage depot to the East.
2. There is without a doubt contamination of the GOCO fuel
depot well, Reference Hydrosystems Inc, engineering report
dated June 12, 1990. page 18. item 2.4.4, contamination in
the Ground Water,
'Significant levels of contamination were observed
in the store well and HW-2, located near the
loading/unloading rack. Contaminant levels HW-2
exceeded drinking water limits by 100's of times for
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and approached the
limit for xylene. Contaminant levels in the store
well were not quite as severe, but still exceeded
drinking water limits for benzene by a factor of 100.-
3, The'rail road right of way along the East property border
lS also a continual source for soil and water contamination.
4. The existing parcel 19 (Booth property) well is inadequate
and failing. A new well drilled on the existing property
would reach the elevation of known contaminants at the GOCO
site at 62 feet down.
Parcel 19 (Booth property), is zoned C-1 and to be developed
..
A'ITACHJ'1r.NT A, PAGE 2
would require a safe water supply for public safety and
health standards. Reference Gloeckner Osborne letter dated
August 8, 1992, 2nd page for lndependent engineering opinion
of life safety issue regarding available water supply to this
property,
7. Soil type parcel 19 (Booth property) is 58-B, Soil
Conservation Map 16. which exhibits Moderate seepage
characteristics with surface drainage deep to water table.
Soil type parcel 18 (Exum property) is 12-C, soil
Conservation Map 16, which exhibits severe seepage
characteristic with surface drainage deep to water table,
I ope this itemized list will assist you with a successful
presentation to the Board of Supervisors. Inclusion in the
Ju isdictional area at this time will obviously preclude much
wo k and expense on my part to continue the pursuit of this water
su ply out of simple necessity if any use of the C-1 zoning of
this property is to be realized, If in fact we have been paying
co ercial tax rates for years we should be able to develop this
property as a commercial use now,
_f?rdially. r. /'
,/ l-) " " '"1 .
I} J/' '\--'.......J'
~_ I' ,-,. !' .,/ ....' ""
- . .._.~.~-~:~
David W, Booth
..
ATI'ACW1ENT A, PAGE 3
P INCIPALS
GLOECKNER & OSBORNE, INC.
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND LAND PLANNERS
no EAST HIGH STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE VIRGINIA 22902
TELEPHONE: (804) 971-1591
FAX NO: (804) 293-7612
KURT M. GL ECKNER, p.e., P.L,S.
P ESIDENT
BRIA P. SMITH, P.E.
vie .PRESIDENT
August 7, 1992
OCT US
Mr. David Booth
Tattershall Farm
Route 3 Box 188
Charlottesville, virginia 22903
Re: site study/Tax Map 79 Parcel 19
Albemarle County, virginia
G&O Job No. 92-045-00
Dear David,
After many weeks of studying the above referenced site, the
following comments and observations can be made.
Because of the strategic location of this property as being at
the intersection of two major highways (state Route 22 and u. S.
Route 250) it is my opinion that his property is very valuable.
Since the property is zoned C-1 (Commercial) it has potential to
be developed in numerous ways and for many uses.
Presently the Virginia Department of Transportation is studying
the best possible access point and will recommend a configuration
of turn and deceleration lanes. I will forward their letter as
soon as I receive it.
I had a nice meeting with the County staff discussing pOtl.~ ~~
development. The Architectural Review Board will have
jurisdiction since the highways are entrance corridors. This
will mean other people's tastes of what is good or looks good
will govern. Sad situation, but true.
The Health Department will require sufficient drain fields for
the chosen commercial use. This then brings me to the proposed
1:6" waterline that is to go through your property. This
waterline easement will use 1,620 square feet of land if it is to
be 20 feet in width. Since it is at the end of your property it
isolates another 1,620 square feet between the easement and
adjacent parcel property line. It would be of utmost importance
to hook on to this line, mainly from a health aspect, but also
for safety and public welfare.
..
ATI'ACHMENT A, PAGE 4
. '
'.
Booth
1992
F'rst from a health aspect, obtaining potable water on this sit
i a questionable reality. The adjacent railroad and oil storage
d pot have polluted land and wells in the area. The Goco oil
s orage site well is contaminated as can be verified from the
S ate Water Control Board through the Freedom of Information Act.
o her wells in the area are of questionable' purity also. Some
h ve been closed, such as Stone Robinson School. From a safety
a pect, when the site is developed, fire protection should be
m de available not only to your site but to the adjacent
s ore/gas station and the bulk fuel storage depot to the rear.
T e welfare of the public would be served in specific as well as
i general ways. ' ,
I you can not tap this 16" waterline, it becomes a liability as
t danger from rupture and encumbering your land. I hope you can
t p this line so that it becomes an asset as opposed to a
1 'ability.
hop~ these remarks are of assistance to you, and we thank you
opportunity to serve.
Sincerely,
Kurt M. Gloeckner, President
GLOECKNER & OSBORNE, INC.
G:tpm
.
ATI'ACHMENI' A, PAGE 5
'.
.0 INTRODUCTION
is report presents the results of an investigation of groundwater contamination from
etroleum hydrocarbons at the Shadwell "76" Service Station and distribution center on
oute 250 in Shadwell, Virginia. HYDROSYSTEMS was engaged to conduct this
nvestigation by Mr. Sherwood Exum of GOCO Oil Company of Charlottesville, Virginia,
wner of the facility.
is investigation was requested by the State Water Control Board (SWCB) in their letter
f August 14, 1989 to Mr. Exum. The SWCB action was initiated in response to a report
f petroleum taste and odor in the domestic well water supply at the site, This report was
iIed by the Albemarle Fire Inspector, Mr. John Paul Jones on April 28, 1989, On June 29,
989 the SWCB collected water samples from the well which serves the site, i\nalytical
esults of these samples, provided in Section 2.4.4, indicate that petroleum contamination
s affecting ground water quality at the site. Based on these results, the SWCB requested
OCO Oil Company to prepare and submit a Site, Risk, and Remediation Assessment to
ddress the apparent contamination at the site.
e purpose of this assessment is to identify the source, nature, and extent of contamination
at this site, assess the risks which such contamination poses, and determine th;e need for
remediation or corrective action. This study is intended to satisfy draft SWCB regulations
governing release response and corrective actions for underground storage tank (UST)
systems containing petroleum products [VR I 680-13-02, Parts V and VI].
1
YOAOSYSTEMS INC_
ATI'ACHT'1ENT A, PAGE 6
~-'.
/' Z\", ,
\ -;
. \
\
igure 2.
Location of commercial and residential wells in the vicinity of the Shadwell
"76" Station, Shadwell, VA,
5
YOROSYSTEMS INC_
-
o
Ll.l - <<l
-J ~ 0)
<( u.. "0
o 0 w
en V
C:i
z
w
CJ
W
-J
4i
>
~
....
"
.......
.. ': ':
~.
A'ITACHMENT A, PAGE 7
................................................-":..
",
II)
0.
II) E
~&
~ - - - --c::::J
...................:.......................................
~a.
'" E
i5~
..,...,,~,
.... "
~! 0 0 a.
II' ~ E
~' ~
..J Z . ~a.
l' 0 1~
f ~
<( , ..
..... : 8
>< , ~
i. en :t
:ll:
. '
, ...
:l
\. l..
\\
'r---. ~ ~
, ".." ....
..,.,., 0
.... ffi
~
o
:z
::l
o
~
ffi
o
:z
~
.....................~._....................
///
-J
D~
...",//
1=
<
l-
ll)
a:
a::
a::
~
lL.
-
'0
~
'0
ro
..c
CI'.l
r::
,9
....
~
....
CI'.l
\0
g---
-
~
~
'0
~
..c
CI'.l
I cO
..c
....
i ....
~
VI
I r::
i .9
~
I u
.9
I ....
r::
I en cO
:::c::: E
I () .9-
<( ~
I 0-
a: cO
t- oo
I I c e:
II <( VI \0
0 e:
cO
ii a: 0-
-J .~
i ! ~ "'0
i i a: "0
~
i! ......
"0
e:
Ii ~
cii
I e:
I 'e.,
~~
e:
~
-
00
l- e:
ffi .~
~ 0
.c
~ Vl
z i i ....
< ~
~ i i 0
~
i ' ~<
I Ci)>
!
! M
I cO
~
! ~
00
i CI:
HYOROSYSTEMS INC_
CD
~
C
.Yo
C
co
I-
'.
A'ITACHMENT h, PAGE 8
~
---
:2
j"".
:~l .
'" 11'1 -l
I 11111 ilL U'l
I IIIIIIIIIJ' ~ ,
11II I tll. "
:: :;, I illlllllll?":; ~
I 'II ill l 0"
;. -, . I. ,Ii I " 1'- .. .., tii .
:: 11'a~:: t: \: i .. \ ' ;.
;"'; I ^I 1111" " , <> .~~. u,<' \
:: f '1\11111111.\ , .,0,\"" ".
., '1111111 \ . ~."- ". \ ' '\
~..,: ,', i\1111hll I <.....,.. \'.'."\\\....
~.) 1 I I\lllllllil: \ . ..,...., \\ \\ \'" ...., ,
~ : 111111111 \ ..'..'...-.....::.:..:...""..'" \\\\\ '\-. .. \\
:"'1 ! I Iqlll!!'l './ ~ ......"... \\\ \\ \ -:. \\
i ! 7/ /~\\I\~I: ,\ j~,I~b. "\~~\\''::' \\',
t": / I I \ 1\11 t.U11" " -'1--0 \~ \ \ \\-,.>.\1 \
~-/: ~ , I \II:~I\' " ,~C'" \,~\ \\ \\ .'. \
~..: / / \!II~lli tii' '" '. (" \.\\\ \\,.\ \.
j ! I, \\\\~lllt::::J '-;> " .~__-\~\\ \"'.,\' "')~
;...., , \1I1111l1l1~ t\~ ~ ',-____- "'~ \ \\ \'" ~ "-\
: I 111111111 I... 5:l _ I " ....~ \ \ \ "'...: ". ", \
;.... I 11\11111111 I' Vl1.. 'J " '\ '...~\ \ \ \ \'" ....
L ,I; 11111111111 I r~r-- _'~ N, \'\', ....~\ \ \ '\-. ...'
:' I a . 1!1\\III1, t.U .~ '. ", \ \ \ \ \ . "'~~
: I 0111111111 ~~ l .~, " \\ \ \ '.x
;'" .,,111 II I ~ .. I u "", \ \ \ '., ",
; I ,,111111 1/-- - ~.,\ \;2 .". \\\\ "., \~
~-, I ~ :I\~III:I I' Er-<I";',\ I' ,~\ \\\ L..... ~..;.
\-; \ : ,i: i: ii:: \ I i ~.-J\ \\\ ,..,~ \~ \ \~~\J~ \ \\
: : I 11\11\1\l1~ II 0111\\ \ \\~.... ~~\\~\ \ \, \\'"
r~\ ,:Ililllll I, ~--1\\i'\ \\.)0.,\ ..\~~\\\~ .....
~:..~' I 111i1111~ \ \ , '1\ '; ......,e;'\ .... ~~\ \!::J .,.'.,~
~: ; \ ; I Id"111i' \ I ICE;l~ ill! \, ;5 \ "'\~~ \:"!i \\' ,
_L; I . I 11111111\ 1\, :s ~ I" ". \, ..\\,\ ~" '.\ "
~' ,\. i 1111 I 0 1\" ~ \\\\~" ,,"'~ I
a:; ~ \ 4 {II II' I IC":~II} J ..... \ "~\\\ICO .': ",: ~ ~ <:
ai'! I f /{IIII\I~\ ~ \ \ ~ }/..... \ \\\,\:::E. \, "\" , J ~
':: I' I I] ,\ .:.~p' > " / ", , i \ t.U \ '. " '
U.". \ I Iflly.'..... ,.-.; ,. -0 ./ I I., '., ~ \ \\\'\\ \ '. " ~L ,
' :; I , ,.. ,\:\ II, " '..:.. c::l' '- -. -.', ... \ \ '. "
.' J ,I ,.\>\~, '\ ~ ~_._-"=,:::-'.............. :2 \ ,,\\, '., '"
~- I\'-...~\"'-..-....-----...::-,",'. :J \ t",\\,'\'" l'
i \ \ \~~~':."'---=- _ ' '~~~""" ~ \ I \.\\,1 ,..".,. (..,.,
~ \" ,"'- ..y '\ , '\ "'. tll \ .\, \ \.. '.
!, ,,\ ~ I, '< ..... ./" \"\\\"'-" 12 \ \ .....\~,..'l.\' .....'...........
;" [ I \ ~ \, , '~;" \ \ \ \ "\ _ \ I ..\\\~,r ':.' ..~.
" \. \' ..... z . , \ \ \ \ ' Cl \ \,~ . '. \..........
:.; f \ \ \ \ ..: ,I 0 ~ \ \ \ \ \ \;-, (\ \ I \\,\. \ ':'. ............. .,
: : I \ ',", ~. (:: ~ \, ;..\.h~,'.'~,,:J ....) ~~\ ". ,'. ',,_.
: ,\ ,,' :<( :,..~..... '";''',''' "., '\\', "".', \ ~'. ."",
j" I \ ,~,~, t; ; ~--,.,..::.\".........<'~<',." ' .\ \..)~", .... \'.~ .. ._,
: It" .....'\:.. .__ -'i.;---_..... .........' "" ". "'~\"'" \ \ \
t. I '-- 1......1.~~;.-.. ..-~~:p.....: :~l~...::;."""'-. .....~.....,'"..... "'.. /,., ."....':.\.... .... \ I \
i -. ~ -. '.. ~ "'-". .... .-....-.., -_, ,..:-..,', ,.....~'.. 1" 'r'.., ... \ ' ,
' , \, "'i Vl\ \' -"I-":'\"~""" I I ~ " \
T 'f/ ..... :-=:-e,;, \ \' I '.''''0\'>:''.. _"'__._(.' \ '\ \ ~,\\ \,
.L ,~ '--, ,\ ; p., ... '-'..... S ~ \ 'I ' j -1'\~~ \-....-.. ':" ,,\,,_,~ __ . '...~ ,\
: I j, ,I: ~ c::::l~,p.,-c:::> I f '7 ~ "\ \ '\ " '\ _.....__.... :~
;.1. -1~: ." i:l ~ \ \ , ./ I \ \ , , " ,.:;'" -v<'
i q : ~S . /.. (g 0\ .,)._..J._ _.L-/-.:-.! II \, \ \ ..\.... ~\. \ \ ...",
,. - i ,,\ ~ ' . - / I I r- \ \ . 'o.'l I ~ ~_ .
~ i ' ,\_ l:2 , " / I.. i'..f. ..I"". \ I \_..\.... i' I f :::'e!-.' ..,.J \ "':.~
! ... , i ..... '~'. .,"..1, .,,1 _,'l'':'t' \ \ I ,\.-:" '\ '\ I (:lit t, \
: ; 1\ t ': ", '....----.... \,.../.. I ,~,.,.' \ '\ I, I /, /: \
r T I I 'l'. \ \ \ \ ,,\, \ \ ", \ \ I I / / J \
!. I I \ \ \ \..,'; \ \ \.\ ) 1 \ I I I /:: " "
t 'r I' \ ...." \ .\".\\,.., \ '\ \ 1\. : \ . / \ I, I (,I //./....: J,,'1~~""~""
", r \ ", \ \1 I ) ) ) ...- ,', ..~,
;,.:. . ~ :,..... ,,' \ \ I . \ /.... -..... /...- .".' " ,I.,'
: : I \ / "";-:"",,, ."... I I I \ 1\ \ ~ I _..;:'-:::.-.~;:;':::~ ......' ...:,.....
: : , / \ \ I. \ //} ..-.......:;:1i::"..::--,.;"",.;::--::::;:::---- .,.,'...' ..,...'
:. '~. I . -/ \ I \.. \ -:;.~::;-~.::::::;-;f:";;:::.~;:-..;---,.:,..;o,. ._,...' i
; : I I / \ \ I )~-.::; !-~~;::{::g.:;:;;. ....,.',.':"."..
,. .; I \,..,: / \ \ <~~,..r-;;; ';:::---""..;::~;-- ,"",~~' .'...t' c
; ~ I !\ : / \ ~?:. .;:::.f.-;~'" ",..;~:""" 1"\ v'
.: ",:.;..', l). ~/"'''''''''; ........ ..:11' ,...' q G '?,.Sv
; ~ I :: -'/9..:::;;.:-.t- ..\....\::~~ ..~.~ ~ , (\ ~
: . I ;. ..~, ....."'........... ..,,,, ,,' cO\)
; ~' , :;;---..... ,...,...',..'.. C. p
: . I ~ r :./~,.,.' \,) ~~~
1: Y , .. .,' .".Jf."... 0
.:. :,' .'_. - t-
....... i ..~...
,.'". 6 I "\',
" .... :. ~ ~\ 10
..... . ~ .. "
y...r........
...
r.ot
ti
tf:
V\
..,..
>-
-l
~
:S:j
4-
x~
0-
~CI
~z
~t:2
o
50~
(J~o
V).....:::
'*
"
v
" "
o "
o ,
~ Q
-
'0
~
'0
Cl:l
.J::
CIJ
c
o
-
Cl:l
-
CIJ
\0
r-
-
'0
~
'0
Cl:l
.J::
CIJ
U
.J::
...
...
co
ell
c
,9
-
Cl:l
U
o
-
'0
~
00
c
OC
o
...
'2
o
~
c
'C
o
.0
'0
C
co
>.
..c::
0..
Cl:l
....
00
o
0..
o
...
U
.J::
-
00
c
.~
o
.J::
ell
c
co
0..
~-<
U5>
~
u
....
::l
00
t.I:
......
GY..
~~\o
~
YDAOSYSTEMS wc_
'J
A'ITACHMENT A, PAGE 9
.. .
-
~
0?-
F:.). *'
'. 1'\ I it!: ....l ".....
!:'"';: I \lllll1t ~ ~,
I \11111 fl, ;3: r -(,)...
IIII1 I i.:..l ; . ~.:(;
:; 11\i111111~ ~ :/"
i,-' ! :\!If!!!II.~ ~;; . . Cj)~
:: t\'l~;~~\~ i" \"_\
~,.' I ~'''"i'\'1 I . <r ,~ ~;.
:! I '1IIIlI 'I, .. , .\~-\~,~. ".
.~...; I 11\11l1\1I, 1\ '",...~".." ':~.,_.,- \ \ \:.\.... .... \
' I 1 1\\11, 'I ' , , \ \. \' "
~... I I 11\\\,1111: \ ,.....,.,. \; \ \\ \:\ .... .
: 1\111,111\ ".'.. '-":-':':":~,., ~\\\ ".' "\\
:.... .! I 11\1I1!!I\' .,.,., ':':':;'" ~ \\\" ::. \\
: .. { J' 1\ \!-: \.' : "", 'l \ ',~ '. ,
: ,} /1 \ IIZ'I' ,"\ t. ..... ~\ ... '. \,
~',I I\II'IUJ:~.. , \ \\\'.'-..::,\\
: ( ! I II\\I-~II: '<, "S \ \'.... ~,\
:':,0; 1\l1t '\ ' ..~ ...~\\\\\
: : I 1 \ III 1 ~ , 0.... \ \ \...."\ 't..
r; / J I \II ~i\\.( :: ~ ,,:,", ~:. _ _\~\\\ \\ \""\' ~\~
\"~/I \\\'I\~lill}~I\f!;l ~ ',,"_-r::x:~- "~,~\\\\\,~,\
: ! I 11\111111 "'@ . ~ '" "'~ \ \ \',.:" '" \
:"': I 11\1\111111 I'Vli'" .; t- " \ "'~\ \\ '... ....
: ; I, \ 111111 lli , r~ - - , ;;: ~ _: \:. ."~\ \ \ \-, "...
: "I ~ o/lll"IIIIL UJ: l;>~ ~ v. .... \ \ \\ '\ ,.'.~
:: .II~'" L~ .z. .~..... '. \\ \ \ "~\
\"rl :'IJIiI\f?/ I/__~~""" .l\u'~~\\\\ "~,\
1 -~ I 1IIIIlilll\~!B~\'\ 0 \~., '1.\\\ \\\,-\ ~~:,
: ! \ 1'111\1111\ 'I 0 \t, r::x: '9 ' '--\\ \\ '1...... ......,
> . I 'Iil{ III I Z \. r.., ,.'.z; , \\,\~ t' , ",
'1" I 1111\ I II' '-oJ ".' _ '\' \ '. "',
: : I 111111 I ---, \ i', t.L. .... \\ ~" ~~,\\ \\ \... ,.:~';
~..; I IIWllIlJ ,I ~. 1\ 'i\\ 0 \ \j~,\ "..\\\\ \ \~{....~:
o~;: 11111\111~111 O:l~' I\Z ... ,\' .,\~"'\\ UJ """_
<..:..; \ . J 111'1I11!,: \ \ C~ ~\ ',0 ...' \ ""\\\\ \:E ' ...' "
0:: -11111111. \ \ I 6 \ ,\\'(\ I~ .,V .
,5~ n; I .~I ,111'1111 \ I I ~ \ I ~ '. ..\~\ ~\ "\\',_~ I
~: : \ ~ '{lI"1l1 \ ~~J LA\ ~~ ,\ .~\\~,~ "" .....f ~~
~,..+ \ i I,II~~ ~ \ \1 0 ~~J e:\.', \ ~\\\~. ~\ "~ . ~
q : \ I f'II\I{'LC:-~"L~ ~(' Q....', ' \\\If\.... ....\=L' ~
,u ..~' I III!I",\~......,~-o.......(. '"_ '-.: ,jC \ \\\,\... ,.,~
: \J/I~'<.\\~" ~>-~-'--'::':::'::~""""" .;2 \ \,\\\\.... ....,
-'~' \ \ '....\\\.,'- ~..:-----~."'... ;.J~ \ / "\\\\\ ", 1'.
~: I \ \'\.~ ~ ':........ --=- ~. ~~,,~ ~ ,\ ( .....\\~\ \ _..,. ,.... '. .
;_.~ ~ 1\ i ,'~~:- ,,\,~\\, _ ~ " \ "~\\\, ....".-..:....,
i..-~ 1\ \ ~I '. - .. 0 \ \ \ \ \" ~ \ \ \\\~~r ~..,! .... .C\~:....
.' ~, ~ 0:: \ 'i-, 0 \" II, "0# , '"',
. , {\ ~ \. \ '. '. ~'o..~ \ \ ,\ \.. (\ \ I \~\'.... '.:.. '".~
;"~ (I ~o ''-, \, r::: e;:: ,S-~~~,~,~'.:~,., '..'OJ ),~~. '.'.. )\ \. '~"_,,,
L.~ 1 \ ~, ,....\ ~ .. ._.; "," ", ~ \ ,.~~!,\. " \. \.
1 :: ~ ~"~':\.""__ ____ _ _: ,_,:-_~_, .....,"~\" .."", _<~\ '\ \" \~\
............ 't-...;:......:,~. - .._f , .,~""""'" ...." "" '. ./ ,.\\, , \ \
! : I -- . ,oJ ..:,..;:-. .. -..,.. ,;;~,---.. .. -: ":~>,,,'t.'" 7'" 'r.,),', .... \ .\
\.._~J -\ ...~~~ ._~. 1--' T"::'\", ,~.:. .~. , I . (\ .... \ .. \
! ~! \ .:::, S...... ~ \ I: I ,I :,\.".~~--\-__.._\ ,.':-_, ~"'~ ,
I...; . : l1. 11" ::, l \ " " \ \,. '\'_'...:... .~.
: I ~1._... -: :1 i ~ ~l1.-c:::l. 1 f . f ,. ~ '\. \. , , ,,_....._..... ,_:~ \
: f; . ; : \: z; ~'" \ \ ~ 'I I" \. \, \. '\ \,'.__"
!.. ;'. I ;:' UJ ..: I J I I I I \ '-.. \. \ ,'\ \ ".
Lh ~~ : ( \0 o~.,)._.i..- '-T-?:::'\ \ \ _..~'i:'~""~----~~"", \ \ \,
~ I: .. &>Jr ' : \ ~.,.,/ I~' (.. ,.j,..,; \ \....\:.... \ "1 . I ~.:,"...\ \
T'';' .: '- ~ \, ...,'..1. .,/ ....I'.~ \ \ .:,,<', "\ ~..J. l \
1\ ~ ". ...-.--..... 1'.../., \ \ \.'.' \ '\ I I ~'-' I' \
. , I II . , I \ \ ....." I \ " \ \ I I ~ /! \
' . . , I \ \ \, \ ~, .\ ) \ I I 1 / I ~ :' e
I I .... '..... . I \ \,..,1' : \ \ \ ~ I / \ \ I I I / ./ .... ....:,.,.:"
I \ " ~ \ ,.,,1," \ I \\ \. " I J 1 J'/ ...-,/ ..:,.... ...").f",!,,
. I r~_' .\" I I \\.. .... J.......... /..... ..".. .t,.'
-..- ". ......... .....~.,. I I I \ II I I ./_....-:;.._........---;;. ,.' .. ,',"
. ." \ ~ ...~.~....... \ \... ....~~..,,-"~,_ ...1 ,....
; ; / '\ , I \. \ /1 J ...........,.;::"::::-;_".;"..:;::':;:;;-_ ..",:" ,.,,;'
~...~. I ~~ -/ \ " \ ~ I .::.-::;..~.::;:;:??;:::..:;;-~ ,.",t" ,....' ~
; : · / \ I' \ ...' _~ ~..r~.q~d",g~;.. ",~"'~.".,"
.:...~ I . ~ / \ I"" ~~ ~'~.':;"': ~_ ." "
I ....A., ~~....":;:: ""'--",'':';:'~.... ,'-",~ "..,1 ' ~
~ i. I ;I-~' \ ~'%. ...,..::,>~ ~ . ""~:",,, c:." v'
':....', ,;,\..' r, -;..;:::........ :;'-::.> .,1" ,..'.R '2,....Jv
'. ',I :':", ~ '-/~3::f../:'l"j,oo"'. "..".......... i ..('~
~.......~ :::;;.............. I'...."..... \\\~
. 'I . ....% -.... ...:" .',' n'O'v
t..~, J :. 1,..... ~..... .....,::.:' ,',' \J S' p
i"Y r ;. ~ .... ".,.,~'~:~::::..., . ,.
~.~.;'.. .;.-. ....... .r.
: I: II ,." ~ ~'"
.: ", : . ". 11
r"; ......... 6 ,......,
.,." ~'.
. t ;
~..
m 3
o
V'\ .
: ~
.... '0
....J:::iu
~~x
~o~
RZ":
oC2~
~o~
~~o
.....o~
ti.lu~o
~~*I
v)'" I
I
..
v
...
Q u
Q ~
~ Q
~
~
-
'0
~
-c
co
..c:
C/)
c:~
.9
-
co
-
C/)
\a
r--
-
'0
~
-c
co
..c:
C/)
ll)
..c:
-
-
co
c:
,9
-
u
.ll)
,=
-c
~
o
l;:4
"'"
ll)
-
co
~
-c
c:
::l
o
"'"
e,:,
vi
ll)
"'"
::l
bQ
~.
....,
. HYDAOSYSTEMS INC_ '
"I" ~"
, "
;....
,.'
~
, .
.."
A'ITACHHENT A, PAGE lO
ells. Additionally, visual observation of water level tapes indicate that no free product is
present in the store well either.
24.4 Dissolved Phase - Contamination in the Ground Water
esults of laboratory analyses of TPH and BTEX performed on ground water samples
c llected from the monitoring wells, the well supplying the store, and from the intermittent
s ream at the downstream border of the property boundary are provided in Table 2. Also
rovided for comparison are analytical results for a sample the store well collected on June
2 , 1989 by the SWCB. All samples showed nondetectable levels of TPH (< 1 ppm), with
t e exception of MWA, which reported a value of 1.4 ppm. This TPH value is believed to
e an outlier, since all BTEX components in this well were below detection, and no other
i dication of contamination (sheen, odor) was observed in this well.
ignificant levels of contamination were observed in the store well ~nd MW-2, located near
t e loading/unloading rack. Contaminant levels MW-2 exceeded drinking water limits by
OO's of times for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and approached the limit for xylene.
ontaminant levels in the store well were not quite as severe, but still exceeded drinking
ater limits for benzene by a factor of 100.
ese high contaminant levels in MW-2 indicate a source at the loading/unloading rack.
e lower, but still elevated, levels observed in the store well appear to be due to
ontaminants spreading in the unsaturated zone or in the groundwater during times of
echarge to the site. The flat water table gradient and soil structure observed in the
aprolitic soils m~y account for this spreading in an apparently "upgradient" direction,
w levels of contamination were also observed in the upgradient well, MW-l. Although
uch lower than that observed in MW-2 or the store well, drinking water standards for
enzene were still exceeded by 10's of times. As with the store well, these levels are
ttributed to spreading in the unsaturated zone, or due to the flat water table gradient in
his area,
W -4, MW -5 and a sample collected at the property boundary from the intermittent stream
long the C&O railroad tracks show nondetectable levels of all BTEX constituents. This
indicates that the contamination is confined to the local area of the loading/unloading rack,
nd is not moving off-site via ground water or surface water pathways.
18
YDROSYSTEMS /NC_
q
A'ITACHMENT A, PAGE II
3.0 RISK ASSESSMENT
. Th s section of this report defines the risk the contamination observed on-site poses to the
en ironment and human health, In conducting this risk assessment, HYDROSYSTEMS
de ines:
. What pathways exist along which the contaminants may migrate
. Who/what are the potential receptors along each pathway
· At what levels could these receptors be exposed and, given these levels, what is the
risk to the re~eptor,
· Do these risks warrant corrective actions to reduce or eliminate t,he risks
Thre following discussion evaluates the above items based on each likely pathway for
co ~taminant migration, Since no significant levels of soil contamination or free product
ha I'e been found on-site, migration via the ground water pathway appears to be the most
significant cause for concern.
3,1 Man-Made Pathways
T\\ 0 man-made pathway exist on site which may be contributing to the spreading of
co taminants, As shown in Figure 3, a 12-inch conduit carries surface water runoff from the
ra< k area past the store well and discharges to the intermittent stream near the :-ailroad
trak:ks, Contaminated runoff carried by this line could be spreading to the well arc~, if a
bn ach exists in this line. Additionally, although a drain line exits from the store well pit,
no outfall could be found. This drain line may join the surface water runoff line. If so,
ble ckage present now or previously in tl:Ie surface drain line may result in a direct conduit
fOl contaminants to travel from the rack area to the well pit. Further investigation of this
pa hway is warranted.
A second man-made pathway which may be contributing to the spreading of the
co [ltamination is the septic system. Contaminated groundwater derived from the store, well
is ~sed for sanitary purposes and discharged to a leach field on the north-northwest side of
tht station. The resultant discharge has the potential to further spread the hydrocarbon
co ~tamination to the groundwater and possibly to surface waters via the seeps.
20
HYDROSYSTEMSwc___
'-0
A'ITACHHEN'r' A, PAGE 12
"
e potential for contaminant migration or impacts via other man-made pathways at the site
ar nonexistent. All utilities serving the site are overhead, thus no underground conduits
ex st for contaminant migration,
Groundwater Pathway
Gi en the significant levels of BTEX components in the groundwater neaF MW-2 and the
st re well, the potential migration of contaminated groundwater poses the greatest risks to
re eptors near this site, The primary receptor of concern is the store well which has already
sh wn to be impacted. Described in Section 2,1 (and shown on Figure 2), other nearby
re idential wells include the Michie residence upslope and approximately 400 feet to the
ea t of the property, the Stone-Robinson Elementary School Well located approximately 800
fe t to the southwest of the property, the Lang residence located approximately 1200 feet
to the east-southeast of the site near the Stone-Robinson school, and wells located at the
Sh dwell Food Store, located approximately 800 feet northeast of the site at the intersection
of Routes 250 and 22,
Oi en the ground water flow directions d~termined in Section 2,3, only one of these wells
sh uld potentially be affected from contamination at the site, The Michie residence located
up lope and to the east of the site is upgradient of the site, and therefore should not be
im acted by conditions at the site, The wells located at the Shadwell Food Store are
10 ated across the apparent ground water divide formed by the discharge area along the
to ographically low area along the railroad tracks. Therefore, these wells would not be
im acted by flow from the site either. The Stone-Robinson school, southwest of the site,
is aterally downgradient from the site, However, a the west-northwest gradient toward the
intermittent~. - - . _nakes impacts to this wen unlikely, Additionally, MW-4, located along
th property boundary directly between the contaminated area and the school well shows
no impacts.
e one residential well which potentilally could be impacted by contaminated ground water
on the site is the Lang residence located west of the site in the topographically low area
al ng the railroad tracks, Although groundwater on the site flows west-northwest, and
ap ears to discharge to the intermittent stream, groundwater which does not discharge
(d ring dry periods, for example) would be expected to flow west parallelling the
in ermittent stream. Although this is a possible pathway, exposure via this pathway is
un ikely for two reasons, First, MW-S which is sited to monitor this flowpath, reveals no
co tamination, This indicates that contamination has not yet even traveled to the site
bo ndary. Based on the suspected groundwater discharge to the seepage area at the
21
YOROSYSTEMSwc___
'.
~
ATI'Arn1ENT A, PAGE 13
rthwestern corner of the station building and intermittent stream, contamination may
n ver travel to the site boundary, Second, based on groundwater flow velocities provided
Section 2,3, and assuming no attenuation, it would take on the order of 2.2 - 60 years to
tr vel the 1200 feet to this well. Continued monitoring of MW-5 could serve as an indicator
o such migration.
Surface Water Pathway
e potential for contaminant migration and impacts to receptors Via a surface water
p thway exists, but appears limited for a number of reasons. The only receptor of surface
w ter discharges is the intermittent stream itself and eventually the Rivanna River. No
h man receptors exist since this intermittent stream is not used for human consumption.
though human receptors are not of concern, pathways do exist for potentially
c ntaminated surface water exiting the site, Pathways include: (1) runoff of surface water
fr m the site (2) groundwater seepage which surfaces at the front of the building entering
t e intermittent stream, and (3) discharge of contaminated groundwater from the rack area
directly to the stream. Although these pathways exist, sampling of the intermittent stream
sows no impacts to the stream. All TPH and BTEX components were nondetectable in
o e grab sample collected at the downstream property boundary, Either no contaminated
g oundwater is reaching this stream, or if it is, the BTEX components are volatilizing in this
s rface flow, Continued monitoring of this stream may be warranted to determine if any
c ntaminants are exiting the site via the surface water pathway,
Air Pathway
Since no free product or significantly contaminated soils occur on site, the accumulation or
m 'gration of significant concentrations of organic vapors is unlikely, The existing station
st cture has no basement, and there are no nearby residences in which vapor accumulation
w uld be of concern. OVA readings taken in the ambient atmosphere in the spill area also
s ow no detectible levels of organic vapors. Therefore there is no risk to any potential
r ceptors via any air pathway.
22
YDROSYSTEMS INC_
..
..
A'ITACHMENT A, PAGE 14
4. REMEDIATION ASSESSMENT
B sed on investigations performed to date, remedial measures do not appear to be
w rranted for this site, No significant hydrocarbons in soils, vapor phase contamination, or
fr e product occurs on the site. Thus, corresponding remedial measures such as soil
excavation and removal, soil venting, biodegradation, or free product recovery are not
a plicable or necessary, With some improvements in product handling on site,
re ommended in section 5.0, natural biodegradation should be sufficient to remove the low
Ie els of soil contamination observed.
though remediation of the contaminated groundwater is feasible, such work does not
a pear to be warranted for several reasons, First, the. quality problems at the station well
ve been in existence for at least 10 years. Although ground water contamination
a parently has existed throughout this time period, HYDROSYSTEMS' work to date shows
c ntamination to be localized in the vicinity of the unloading rack and store well. Thus, it
a pears that contamination has not moved significantly, and is therefore not likely to
m grate and negatively impact nearby residential wells, Further monitoring and the
re ommendations outlined in Section 5.0 would confirm this assumption.
S cond, other than the store well, no other receptors exist which would likely be impacted
b the contamination on the site, As described in Sections 2,1 and 3,2, although the Lang
re idential well is located downgradient of the site, impacts to this well are unlikely due to
a ombination of the distance to the well and that the contaminated groundwater appears
to be discharging to the intermittent stream on the rear portion of the property,
Li ewise, although the Stone-Robinson School is laterally downgradient, impacts to this well
ar unlikely since groundwater flows more due west, along or discharging to the intermittent
st earn ale 6' ... ;ailroad, In either case, monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 located along
th downgradient boundary of the property, and one additional well placed near the station
b ilding could be used to monitor for and detect any such migration toward these users.
If ater quality degradation were to be observed in these wells, appropriate remedial actions
co Id be pursued as needed at that time,
If required, a remediation scheme using ground water pumping/collection followed by
tr atment and discharge to surface water would most likely be used at this site, Since
gr und water is shallow (< 11') in the most highly contaminated portion of the site, a
gr undwater collection system composed of horizontal drains may be applicable. In shallow
w ter table situations, such systems are often more cost-effective to install and operate than
p mping well systems, If use of horizontal drains is not possible, a pumping well system
co Id be installed. This system would most likely be a 2-well system, using the existing well
23
YOROSYSTEMS INC_
. . ...
A'ITA~ A, PAGE l5
supplying the store as one pumping well. An additional pumping well would be installed
n ar the unloading rack in the most highly contaminated area. Pumping rates of these wells
uld be determined based'on an analysis of pumping test data.
,
ntaminated groundwater collected by a drain or pumping well system would then require
tr atment. Air stripping is clearly the technology of choice for treatment and removal of
v latile organic compounds at these levels from water', Sizing of an air stripping unit would
b based on expected pumping rates from the recovery wells, Depending upon the influent
w' ter quality, an oil/water separator may be installed in-line ahead of the air stripping unit.
ter treatment, water would be discharged to the intermittent stream bounding the site,
si ce no sewerage facilities serve the area. This discharge would most likely be conducted
u der an Virginia Pollution Abatemen~ permit (VP A), Depending upon the removals
achieved with air stripping and the effluent limitations imposed on this discharge, a carbon
a sorption finishing unit may be required for final treatment prior to discharge.
CORRECTIVE AcrION PLAN
described in ,Section, 4.0, ground water remediation at this site does not appear to b~
n cessary at this time, based on the relatively immobile nature of the contamination and the'
la k of receptors likely to be impacted, However, further work should be performed to
d fine and eliminate potential sources of contamination and to ensure that contamination
w ich is present does not migrate off-site and impact potential receptors.
ork recommended to adequately characterize the source of contamination and limit such
so rces includes:
-'
· Investigate the line carrying runoff from the gravel area near the unloading rack to
ensufe this is 'not connected to or otherwise a source of contamination in the well pit.
· Discontinue use of the store well. Drill a replacement well in the vicinity of MW-4
to provide water supply for the station.
· Excavate and remove surficial petroleum-contaminated soils near the fuel
loading/unloading rack. Pave this area with concrete to eliminate continued
contamination due to product spillage, Berm or slope this area to contain runoff,
which should be directed through an oil/water separator prior to discharge,
24
YDRQSYSTEMS INC_
I
..
"'
t'
A'ITACHMENT A, PAGE l6
..
Work recommended to ensure that the contamination present does not migrate off-site and
impact potential receptors includes:
,
.
Monitor water quality in all monitoring wells, the store well, and the intermittent
stream semiannually for a minimum of two years. Samples should be analyzed for,
BTEX components, and results provided to the SWCB. At the end of this two year
period, provide the SWCB with a summary of all data collected to date and
recommendations for further monitoring and disposition of the site,
.'
I
If significant water quality degradation is observed in any monitoring well, which
indicates that the contamination is migrating, implement ground water remediation
as discussed in Section 4,0. Provide the SWCB a corrective action plan prior to
implementing this wor:k.
other housekeeping recommendations which are largely unrelated to the ground water
cdntamination on-site include:
I
· Remove and properly dispose of the abandoned USTs currently stockpile'd at the rear
of the site.
· : Excavate and properly dispose surficial petroleum-contaminated soils in the viciruty
of the gas, diesel, and kerosene pumps, and along the northeast corner of the gravel
parking lot.
25
HYOROSYSTEMSwc__
. ,
November 6, 1991 (Regular Night Meeting)
(P,!-ge 19)
A'IT~CHMENT B, PAGE 1
Staff Comment: The boarding of animals was not part of th~original
special use permit request for this site, The applicant proposes to
board cats only and will use facilities currently in place. No
.exterior modifications will be required. Activity on site should not
increase as no extra trips to the site during non-business hours will
be required. Return trips to the site during evenings and weekends
are currently required to care for sick or injured animals.
During the review of SP-89-06, staff received three letters concerning
the animal hospital, Staff has included these letters for the Plan-
ning Commission and Board of Supervisors use.
It is the opinion of staff that the proposed use will not appreciably
increase activity at the site. Staff is unaware of any complaints
about the animal hospital. Based on the limited impact of the pro-
posed use, staff recommends approval subject to the following condi-
tions:
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
1, Animals shall be confined to an enclosed structure. Noise mea-
sured at the nearest lot line shall not exceed forty (40) deci-
bels; and
2, Commercial boarding shall be limited to cats only,"
Mr, Keeler said the Planning Commission, at its meeting on October 1,
1991, unanimously recommended approval of SP-91-51 subject to the two condi-
tions recommended by staff.
Mr. Bowie opened the public hearing and asked the applicant if he wished
to speak,
Mr, John Gruss, the applicant and a veterinarian, said there are already
dogs and cats at' the hospital, and he would like to board cats, He recognized
that the intent of the special use permit was to control sound, but he does
not think that cats would be adding a significant sound level that is not
there already. He does not believe that neighbors are now being bothered and
he does not think this amendment will propose any significant changes to what
is already going on at the hospital.
No one else wanted to address the matter, so Mr. Bowie closed the public
hearing,
Motion was made by Mr, Perkins, seconded by Mrs. Humphris, to approve
SP-91-S1 subject to the two conditions recommended by the Planning Commission,
With no further discussion, roll was called and the motion carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs, Bain, Bowerman, Bowie, Mrs. Humphris, Mr, Perkins and Mr. Way.
None.
(The conditions of approval are set out in full below,)
1, Animals shall be confined to an enclosed structure. Noise mea-
sured at the nearest lot line shall not exceed forty (40) deci-
bels; and
2, Commercial boarding shall be limited to cats only,
Agenda Item No, 13. Public Hearing on a,J:.eql1est to amend..the service
area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority to include GLENMORE
.f:RD.:+oJ;.water and sewer service. Property consists of approx 1141,7 ac bor-
dered by US Rt 250 E on the N & by the Rivanna River on the S & W, Property
comprises the majority of the Rivanna Village, a designated growth area,
TM7D,P6&7,Sec 3; TM93,P59&60; TM94,P2&11. Rivanna Dist. This is a designated
growth area, (Advertised in the Daily Progress September 16 and September 23,
1991. )
Mr. Keeler summarized the following staff report:
. .
..
November 6, 1991 (Regular Night Meeting)
(Page 20)
ATI'~1EN'l1 B, PAI,E 2
:1
II
I
,!
"Property: The property consists of :t1141. 7 acres described as Tax Map
79D, Section 3, Parcels 6 and 7; Tax Map 93, Parcels 59 and 60 and Tax
Map 94, Parcels 2 and 11. The property, bordered by U. S. Route 250
East on the north and by the Rivanna River on the south and west,
comprises the majority of the Rivanna Village, a designated growth area
in the Rivanna Magisterial District,
Request: To schedule a public hearing for amendment to the Albemarle
County Service Authority jurisdictional area for public water and sewer
on the above referenced parcels,
Background: Provision of public water and sewer was at the center of
consideration for the Rivanna Village and, more specifically, approval
of the Glenmore PRO (ZMA-90-19). Public water and sewer were both a
condition for development in the Village and proffered in ZMA-90-19 to
be provided at the expense o~ the applicant (Frank Kessler). During
the review of ZMA-90-19 the applicant submitted a letter to request
inclusion in the jurisdictional area. This letter was included in the
staff report as an attachment. The staff report stated: 'The appli-
cant has submitted a request to the Board of Supervisors for inclusion
of Glenmore into the Albemarle County Service Authority jurisdictional
area for a public water and sewer service. The Board in its action on
this request can adequately address this matter. I
However, this item was not specifically addressed in the action nor was
it listed on the Board's agenda as a separate item. In order to defin-
itively resolve this matter, staff recommends the Board state a resolu-
tion of intent to forward this request to public hearing, This public
hearing is recommended to be held at your November 6, 1991 meeting,"
Mr. Bowie opened the public hearing. No one came forward, so Mr. Bowie
closed the public hearing.
Motion was offered by Mrs, Humphris, seconded by Mr. Bowe~an, to amend
the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority to
include the following parcels in Glenmore PRO for water and sewer service:
Tax Map 79D, Section 3, Parcels 6 and 7; Tax Map 93, Parcels 59 and 60; and
Tax Map 94, Parcels 2 and 11, With no further discussion, roll was called and
the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Bain, Bowerman, Bowie, Mrs. Humphris, Mr. Perkins and Mr. Way.
None.
Agenda Item No, 14, Request from Daniel Bieker to include property shown
on Tax Map 79 as-Parcel 25A near Glenmore in the Albemarle County Service
Authority service area boundaries for water and sewer service.
Mr, Keeler said Mr. Bieker is requesting that his property near Glenmore
be included in the Albemarle County Service Authority's service area bounda-
ries for water and sewer service. He pointed out the property on the map and
said the staff is recommending that a public hearing be set. He added that
staff is recommending, in addition to Mr. Bieker's property, that all other
properties in the Village of Rivanna be included in the Albemarle County
Service Authority service area boundaries for public water and sewer. He said
there is a list of the properties provided as Attachment C (on file).
Motion was offered by Mr. Bain, seconded by Mrs, Humphris, to set a
public 'hearing for December 18, 1991, to consider full designation for all
remaining properties in the Village of Rivanna, including Mr. Daniel Bieker's.
With no further discussion, roll was called and the motion carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Bain, Bowerman, Bowie, Mrs, Humphris, Mr, Perkins and Mr. Way.
None.
Agenda Item No, 15a. Appointment: Appoint a voting member for the
Virginia Association of Counties (VACo) Annual Meeting.
Mr, Bowie said a representative and an alternate from the Board of
Supervisors need to be appointed to vote at the VACo Annual Business Meeting,
, .
~
4
ATr
December 18, 1991 (Regular Night Meeting)
(Page 16)
from "up-zoning" property, It is a well-known fact that once property is
rezoned from R-6 to R-15 the land immensely increases in value, He thinks
there could be a ripple effect if this is done, VDoT could decide to acquire
all the prpperty along the route.
Mr, Bowerman said he thinks that if the rezoning was accompanied by a
specific plan, it would put a different light on the request, He thinks that
since there is no plan. the request should not be approved. Mr. Bowie agreed.
Mrs. Humphris said she thinks it would be in the best interest of the
County to have the property zoned R-15 and developed, but to keep the faith
with the Commonwealth Transportation Board. this Board needs to honor its
statements. She does not think the request should be approved.
Mr. St, John commented that the Board is "caught between a rock and a
hard place" because it does not want to give the impression that it has
entered into a binding agreement with VDoT and will not exercise its legis-
lative judgement in rezonings.
Mr. Bowerman then offered motion. seconded by Mrs. Humphris, to deny
ZMA-89-09, Roll was called and the motion carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs, Bain, Bowerman. Bowie. Mrs. Humphris, Mr. Perkins and Mr. Way.
None,
Agenda lteIII..No...lo..!.~~LIC HEARING on a request.. tOa.Illend the service
a.cea boundad.es of the Albemarle" County Service Authority for water and sewer
. service" to include all remaining properties as shown in the Comprehensive Plan
as the Rivanna.Village, which is a designated growth area, (Advertised in the
Daily Progress on December 3 and December 10, 1991.)
Mr. Cilimberg said last month the Board had before it a request to amend
the Albemarle County Service Authority's service area boundaries for water and
sewer service to the Glenmore property in the Village of Rivanna, At that
time, staff asked the Board to consider amending the service area boundaries
for water and sewer service to the entire Rivanna Village "which would be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He presented a map which covered the
Village area,
Mr. Bowie asked if this amendment would make it mandatory for a subdivi-
sion to connect to water and sewer service. Mr. St. John responded "no". but
a future Board could require the connection following a public hearing, Mr.
Cilimberg said this amendment does not mean that the properties within the
service areas will automatically have water and sewer available.
The Chairman opened the public hearing.
Mr. Dan Bieker, a property owner, said he hopes the Board approves this
designation. He does not think water and sewer service should just be
available to Glenmore.
There being no other public comments. the public hearing was closed.
Motion was offered by Mr, Bain. seconded by Mr. Bowerman, to amend the
service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for water
and sewer service to include all remaining properties as shown in the Compre-
hensive Plan as the Rivanna Village. which is a designated growth area. and
set out as follows: Tax Map 79, Parcels 25, 25A, 25B, 25C, 26, 28. 29. 30.
31. 32. 33, 34, 35, 35A; Tax Map 79D. Parcels 1, 2. 3. 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19; Tax Map 80, Parcels 46. 46A, 46B, 46C, 46D, 46E,
47; 48. 49, 49A. 50, 51. 52. 53, 54, 54A, 55. 55A. 55B, 55C, 56, 56A, 57, 57A,
58, 58A; Tax Map 93. Parcels 61, 61A, 61B, 62; and Tax Map 94. Parcels 1. 1A.
3.4,5,6.7. 7A. 7B. 8, 8A, 8C. 8D. 8E, 8F, 9,10,47, 47A, 48. 49B, 49C,
50, 51, 57. 58, 59, 60, 61. 62, 63, 64. 65. 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73,
74, Roll was called and the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs, Bain. Bowerman. Bowie. Mrs. Humphris, Mr, Perkins and Mr. Way.
None.
B, PAGE 3
~ I
~
o
<Xl
,/........ ./ \
-./' .../
'--.L \ \-.--' .,f"/ /'
~~ ~ .., .
r--?<--Y \,:7':/ . /;5~~
% /;. /'~ . ,
· y/
'. .,.....
_.~~~.~,~5'
.r=--=c--~~.
.-1/ \ -----
R_
//_~___ :-7~
/ ~--
/ /-+-----. /--/
../ ~ /-------
j \ /
~ ~ 'V~ ---r--- ~ '\ Q //
~ \ a: ~~
w . 0 -x------ ---( '-J
~ ti J r~
< 1: -./;>Z "" ~\
o ------~ ----- ---'\:-----
.~ :\ \-______~-I----
~--------1>- ~
~ ~ ~_/n
____~ 7 i
~ [-1-
~ ~~. :
~~~ ~
~ ~!J\
u
..
~
~
F:1::
>-
.....
z
=>
o
(,)
--
'\
\
>-
.....
z
=>
o
(,)
W
.J
0:: ~
<t
~
W
CD
...J
<t
''1
I
)
/
/
i
.~
N
N
9
..J
....
U
;::
Z
o
::;
,...."
:\.
0')
I'-
Z
o
.-.
(,)
W
CJ)
Cf)
I-
o
00:::
Zl-
<(~
o
~<
ZW
Z...J
~~
->
a:::Cf)
l-
I-
o
(,)
(/)
o(/)
ZI-
<0
a:::
~ I-
1.&JCf)
...J-
...Jo
:>
(/)<
~Z
OZ
O<{
(/)>
a:::
t-
~ !
I
..
-'
.
u.
~ :
r
Nove ber 16, 1992
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community DeVelopment
401 McIntire Road
CharJottesvilJe, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
Sherwo d E, Exum
924 Ha ris Street
Charlot esvi11e, VA
22903
RE:
A bemarle COunty Service Authorit . . .
for David W Booth/Sandr A d Y (ACSA)JUr1sd1ct1onal Area Amendment
Ma 79, Par~els 18 and 1; n re~s and Sherwood Exum (Goco, Inc) _ Tax
The Albern :le COunty Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on November 4, 1992,
set a pub 1c hear1ng for December 16, 1992 for the above-noted request to
amend the Albemarle COunty Service Authority service area boundaries for
'~ter onl · to Tax ~p 79, Parcels 18 and 19.
REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT FOR THIS MEETING.
The Board equests a copy of the letter dated August 14, 1989 from the State
Water Contr 1 Board concerning an investigation of ground~ater cOntamination.
Please for~ rd to me as SOon as Possible. Several Board members would like to
visit the s te of Your request before December 16. Please COntact me as to
Possible ti to meet,
If you
please
questions or comments regarding the above noted action,
to Contact me.
Sincerely,
. .
O(~&~ .
V, Wayne tlli ber~ ~
Director of PannIng & C~Unity Development
\_-_.//
VWC/jcw
~c :
David W, Booth
Amelia atterson
Bill Brent
30 Higgins
'. or ..
.
,
,
I
N~vember 16, 1992
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902.4596
(804) 296-5823
S~erwood E, Exurn
9~4 Harris Street
C~arlottesville, VA
22903
RE: Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA)Jurisdictional Area Amendment
for David W, Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exurn (Goco, Inc) _ Tax
Map 79, Parcels 18 and 19
Dear Mr, Exurn:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on November 4, 1992,
set a public hearing for December 16, 1992 for the above-noted request to
am~nd the Albemarle County Service Authority service area boundaries for
"water only" to Tax Map 79, Parcels 18 and 19.
YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT FOR THIS MEETING,
Th~ Board requests a copy of the letter dated August 14, 1989 from the State
Water Control Board concerning an investigation of groundwater contamination.
Pl~ase forward to me as soon as possible. Several Board members would like to
vi$it the site of your request before December 16. Please contact me as to
possible times to meet.
If,you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
O{))flr~,rfi'~/lJ2
V, ,Wayne tilimber!('
Di*ector of Plann~:_..:,} mmunity Development
VWC/jcw
cc:'
David W. Booth
Amelia Patterson
Bill Brent
Jo Higgins
" .,.. ..
41
4
i
I
No~ember 17, 1992
i
i
,
,
,
I
I
I
i
,
I
i
Da}rid W. Booth
Rti, 3, Box 188
Charlottesville,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
VA 22903
I
I
RE; Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) Jurisdictional Area Amendment
for David W. Booth/Sandra Andrews and Sherwood Exum (Goco, Inc) _ Tax
Map 79, Parcels 18 and 19
Detr Mr. Booth;
I
I
Th+ Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on November 4, 1992,
set a public hearing for December 16, 1992 for the above-noted request to
amend the Albemarle County Service Authority service area boundaries for
"water only" to Tax Map 79, Parcels 18 and 19.
YO* OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT FOR THIS MEETING.
!
The Board requests a copy of the letter dated August 14, 1989 from the State
Wa~er Control Board concerning an investigation of groundwater contamination.
P1~ase forward to me as soon as possible. Several Board members would like to
visit the site of your request before December 16. Please contact me as to
Po~sible times to meet.
I
i
lflyou should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action,
I
pl~ase do not hesitate to contact me.
I
I
Sir1.cere1y,
I
L{Llh oJ2'
V. Iwayne/:.:J1;;;;;;g /
Dilector ~~~~~~in~& Co
VWCVjcw
ity Development
cc:1 Sherwood Exum
Bill Brent
Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
.~. (~""JJ..,~~
. (Q >Nl'j ~\ ~"f,-, ,::..
'.. . C-:z.. 1'1::2/1::::' 1;:)-
.. :flJ'1 , 7 J. L..]v _). -
~- ~
Ff.: q 1C' Q:i
l;ii
....../ "
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
EMORANDUM
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
David B. Benish~~hief of Community Development
February 25, 1993
status Report On Crozet Crossing
his is to provide the Board a status of the Crozet Crossing
ubdivision. staff and representatives of CHF and AHIP will be
vailable at the March 3 Board meeting to answer any questions.
site Development - site work, consisting of primarily road
construction (including stream crossing) and utility
installation is approximately ninety-three percent complete.
Hard surfacing and final erosion control measures need to be
completed. It is anticipated that the first three units can
be occupied in May at which time the County will proceed
with getting the road accepted into the state secondary
system. The new road is now being used for access to the
site from Cling Lane.
2. Home Construction - There are currently thirteen units under
construction. As noted above, three units should be ready
for occupancy in May. All thirty units are scheduled to be
completed by the end of November, 1993.
3. Home Sales - At this time there is a waiting list of 185
applicants. Twenty-eight applicants have satisfied all
requirements to qualify for purchasing a home. Fifteen of
those are considered ready to purchase homes. Twenty-seven
additional families have been signed up to attend the next
homebuyers seminar (the fifth seminar held to date), which
is a requirement for ownership in Crozet Crossing.
.J ,
Dobert W. Tucker, Jr.
Page 2
~ebruary 25, 1993
CHF will be closing on the VHDA construction loan within the
next 1-2 weeks. This construction loan is for $1,375,000.
However, only a maximum of $550,000 can be outstanding at
any period of time. Because of this requirement CHF would
like to begin selling homes as soon as possible. The CHF
Board has agreed to begin sales. Because of its partnership
with the County in this project, the CBP Board is requestinq
the consent of the County Board of Supervisors in proceedinq
with home sales. Staff would recommend Board approval to
proceed with home sales.
~ . Recapture Plan Amendment - It has been the intent of CHF and
the County to recapture public funds contributed to this
project and recycle those funds into other housing efforts
in the County. In order to do this with a project using a
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), a program income
plan was approved by the Virginia Department of Housing and
Community Development (DHCD), the agency responsible for
administering the CDBG program. Therefore, County and CHF
developed a Recapture Plan which outlined the amount of
funds to be recaptured, method of recapture, and the
intended use of those funds.
The existing Recapture Plan, approved by the County and
DHCD, anticipates recapturing 100 percent of CDBG, County
and CHF funds invested in the project ($813,000). These
were to be recaptured based on the homebuyers ability to pay
either as cash at closing of the initial sale or secured
through a second deed of trust to be recaptured at the
subsequent sale of the home.
The Recapture Plan was developed before final construction
plans were completed and before bids were received for the
work. It was drafted as a "best case" scenario where 100
percent of the funds would be recaptured. Bids for both
site development work and house construction came in at
higher costs than initially anticipated. Also, CHF has
incurred additional cost over and above those which were
previously anticipated to be covered with in-kind
contributions of service.
In order to offset the additional cost while continuing to
provide the maximum assistance/benefit to the purchasers,
the Recapture Plan needs to be revised to more accurately
indicate the amount of funds anticipated to be recaptured.
The minimum amount to be recaptured is $300,000. It is
./ "
~obert w. Tucker, Jr.
Page 3
~ebruary 25, 1993
quite possible that additional amounts can be recaptured,
depending on the purchaser's ability to payor reduced
development cost. The County and CHF are attempting to
minimize the cost of development to the greatest extent
possible. Staff recommends the Board approve amendment of
the Recapture Plan to reflect a minimum recapture of
$300,000. If approved by the Board, staff will make the
necessary amendments to be siqned by the County Executive
and forwarded to DBCD for approval.
I~BB/j cw
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, that pursuant to public hearings, the County of
A bemarle wishes to apply $500,000 of Virginia Community Developm-
e t Block Grant funds for a housing rehabilitation project to
a dress thirty-two (32) dwelling units; and
WHEREAS, $20l,000 from Albemarle County and $460,000 will be
s cured in the form of low interest loans on behalf of the client
f ilies from the Charlottesville Housing Foundation loan fund, the
V"rginia Housing Partnership loan fund and Farmers Home Administra-
t" on; it is projected that eighty (80) persons will benefit from
t e implementation of this project; all of which are low-and-
m derate income persons;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Robert W. Tucker,
ecutive, is hereby authorized to sign and submit the
cuments for submittal of this Virginia Community
ock Grant application.
Jr., County
appropriate
Development
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
wr"ting, is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously
ad pted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
at a regular meeting held on March 3, 1993.
~Jh- )t {! tWtJ-
Clerk, Board of c~nty Supervisors
~)
Y/" y' - . .,... "
/ <: (/L--VV ~ ,'-.
3/3/5 ~
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
W~EREAS, that pursuant to public hearings, the County of
A bemarle wishes to apply $500,000 of Virginia Community
Development Block Grant funds for a housing rehabilitation
p oject to address thirty-two dwelling units; and
A~D WHEREAS, $201,000 from Albemarle County and $460,000 will be
s~cured in the form of low interest loans on behalf of client
f~milies from the Charlottesville Housing Foundation loan fund,
t~e Virginia Housing Partnership loan fund and Farmers Howe
Aaministration; it is projected that 80 persons will benefit from
t~e implementation of this project; all of which are low-and
mbderate-income persons;
N(bw, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County
E ecutive, is hereby authorized to sign and submit the
abpropriate documents for submittal of this Virginia Community
Dlevelopment Block Grant application.
* * * * *
c,
. .
, .
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
yl',~0" - 513
1.'xlj()'3, ,);:
MEMORANDUM
Bob Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
David B. Benish, Chief of Community Development~~lln(~
February 26, 1993
1993 Community Development Block Grant Application
tached please find the Project Description for the 1993
mmunity Development Block Grant project. The County proposes
apply for this grant in conjunction with the Albemarle Housing
provement Program (AHIP). The Board of Supervisors must
prove of this proposal and authorize the County Executive to
bmit this application for CDBG funds. A draft resolution is
so attached. If you have any questions, please contact me.
B/mem
TACHMENTS
STAFF PERSON:
DATE:
DAVID B. BENISH
FEBRUARY 26, 1993
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
HOUSING REHABILITATION PROJECT
1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
PROJECT SUMMARY
Pro;ect Description:
Albemarle County in conjunction with Albemarle Housing
Improvement Program (AHIP) proposes to rehabilitate thirty-two
substandard homes in the County currently by owners
(single-family detached units). All rehabilitation will bring
the units up to or will exceed Section 8 minimum standards.
Thus, all conditions that qualify the units as substandard
(lacking partial of complete plumbing and/or major exterior of
interior problems) will be addresses.
The County proposes to use Community Development Block Grant
funds for the following activities:
- construction
o labor
o building materials
- administration
Grant funds would be leveraged with other funds to implement the
project. Grant administration will be the responsibility of the
Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community
Development. Day to day administration of the rehabilitation
project will be the responsibility of AHIP.
Pro;ect Beneficiaries:
Thirty-two low-moderate families will benefit from the housing
rehabilitation project. There are a total of 80 project
beneficiaries in the following project areas: Esmont, Schuyler,
and Keswick.
Income eligibility will be verified by AHIP which maintains a
waiting list of such families who desire rehabilitation
assistance.
Amount of Request:
Albemarle County will request $500,000 in Community Development
Block Grant funds for implementation of this project. These
funds will be leveraged with funds from the County $201,000 the
Charlottesville Housing Foundation, Farmers Home Administration,
Virginia Housing Partnership Fund, and the Indoor Plumbing
Program totalling $460,000.
Total project cost will be $1,161,000.
,
\
J
~~~.)
-~
, )
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, that pursuant to public hearings, the County of
Albemarle wishes to apply $500,000 of Virginia Community
Development Block Grant funds for a housing rehabilitation
project to address thirty-two dwelling units; and
AND WHEREAS, $201,000 from Albemarle County and $460,000 will be
secured in the form of low interest loans on behalf of client
families from Charlottesville Housing Foundation loan fund, the
Virginia Housing Partnership loan persons will benefit from the
implementation of this project; all of which are low-and
mOderate-income persons;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County
Executive, is hereby authorized to sign and submit the
appropriate documents for submittal of this Virginia Community
Development Block Grant application.
* * * * *
l...,
~ .~.'. ,
.- ~ ..2'''7
'~4)."c'; L:- ,."')
j' .~,~-...'" ~
I
q3, (9{l2..(6"{)
,
-!r::, .
FE8 ~L--"
'"'
l>...,..,-, :..J--~ i>'i <_
,::1;":
..1 LL'-v'....
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Parks and Recreation Department
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5844
MEMORANDUM
: Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
Patrick K. Mullaney, Director of Parks and Recreationt'~
February 24, 1993
: Darden Towe Memorial Committee Recommendation
On February 23 the Rivanna Park Committee met to discuss the
r commendation of the Darden Towe Memorial Committee to rename
R'vanna Park.
In attendance were David Bowerman and Charles Martin from the
unty and David Toscano from the City. The Committee immediately
e dorsed the concept and after a very short discussion, agreed to
r.commend the name "Darden Towe Memorial Park" to Board and
C uncil. This name was recommended to the Committee by the City
P rks and Recreation Advisory Committee. City Council endorsed the
i ea to rename the park at their meeting on February 15.
The Committee also briefly discussed two other items from the
to Board and Council of February 4 from the Memorial
mmittee. Committee members agreed with the idea that the future
eenbelt Park be named Rivanna Greenbelt Park. Also, it is
commending that permission be granted for private funds to be
ised by the Memorial Committee for the purpose of financing a
st of Darden to be placed in the park. Finally, the Rivanna
mmittee would like to review and approve the design and placement
the bust.
I believe that it is intended that this item be discussed at
e March 3 Board meeting. If I need to provide additional
formation, please let me know. Enclosed is a copy of the Darden
we Memorial Committee recommendations.
M/sms
closure
\
CITY OF
CHARLOTTESVILLE
VIRGINIA
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE
RE:
City Council and Board of Supervisors
Marshall Pryor, Chair, Darden Towe Memorial committee/~
February 4, 1993
Recommendations
It did not take long for the Darden Towe Memorial
Committee to find an appropriate memorial to Darden. It is
our unanimous recommendation that Rivanna Park be renamed
Darden Towe Park (or Towe Park).
Darden Towe spent his life, both publicly and privately,
advocating for and supporting the Charlottesville/Albemarle
community. His interests were many, but none were greater
than his love of sports and children. Parks and Recreation
programs in general, softball and fishing, activities for
children and families, projects which brought the
Charlottesville and Albemarle communities together as one
Darden's favorite things all are present in Rivanna Park.
Not only did Darden help plan the Park during his term on
City Council, but his involvement continued as Chair of the
City's Parks and Recreation Advisory Board.
We hope that you will agree with our recommendation and
will authorize us to work with the City and County Parks
Departments on appropriate new signage.
It is also our recommendation that the soon-to-be
developed Greenbelt Park be named Rivanna Greenbelt Park.
In addition, we would like to request permission to begin
raising funds to finance a bust of Darden to be placed in the
Park. We would seek no public funds for this effort and would
plan to raise the money entirely from the private sector.
On a different, but related subject, the Committee would
like to recommend that the Albemarle County Historical
Society give consideration to dedicating a wall or room of
the former McIntire Library building as a "Charlottesville
Hall of Fame" to recognize the many citizens of
Charlottesville and Albemarle County who have made and will
continue to make contributions to our community.
.
,.
-2-
Many people have made contributions of time and money,
but Darden stands out as one of the greatest advocates for
the Charlottesville/Albemarle community and we hope you accept
our recommendations and rename Rivanna Park Darden Towe Park.
I would like to attend your next regular meeting to
present the Committee's recommendation.
f
.
,
, :~:?1~~,:~:8
~ <03Q2~t<.3
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
A udi tor of Pub lie Accounts
WALTER J, K~CHARSKI
AUDITOR
POST OFFICE BOX 1295
RICHMO~D. VIRGINIA 23210
(804) 225-3350
January 26, 1993
The Honorable Members of the
Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Dear Members:
We have received copies of the audited financial statements of the County of Albemarle,
Virginia, for the year ended June 30, 1992.
Section 15.1-167, Code of Virginia, provides that the audits of local governments be
conducted in accordance with the specifications of the Auditor of Public Accounts. The Uniform
Financial Reporting Manual for Virginia Counties and Municipalities issued in 1980, effective for
years ending on and after June 30, 1981, requires that financial reports of Virginia localities be
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated by the
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The only deviation from generally accepted
accounting principles allowed by this Office is that we do not require the capitalization of general
fixed assets.
In addition to the reporting requirements by the GASB, the Uniform Financial Reporting
Manual prescribes certain supplemental information which must be included in local government
financial reports. This information is prescribed to provide local officials and other readers with
more detailed audited information to increase the meaningfulness of the reports.
Upon the completion of each audit, reports are submitted to this Office for review and
approval as being presented in accordance with our specifications. Our review is limited to proper
financial reporting and our approval of reports only provides the governing body with assurance
that such reports are presented in accordance with the specifications of the Auditor of Public
Accounts. Our review does not consist of a review of the auditor's working papers to determine
the quality of audit work.
We have reviewed the financial report of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, and find that
It IS prepared in accordance with the specifications of the Auditor of Public Accounts and,
therefore, the report is accepted by this Office.
S incerel y ,
/ l'
~~-
f
Walter J. K arski
Auditor of Public Accounts
WJK:jtv
cc: Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates, P.C., Certified Public Accountants
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Surety
..
WALTER J, KljICHARSKI
AUDITOR :
I
I
I
I TO:
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Auditor of Public Accounts
POST OFFICE BOX 1295
RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23210
(804) 225-3350
FROM:
County Administrator
County of Albemarle ~ ~
William V. Sutton\!Uanager, Systems and Quality Control
DATE:
January 26, 1993
Under the provisions of the Single Audit Act of 1984 and OMB Circular A-128, local
governments are required to submit a copy of their single audit report to each provider of federal
financial assistance. In addition, local governments must submit a Corrective Action Plan
addressing all items of noncompliance and weaknesses in internal controls noted in the auditor's
report.
The Office of the Auditor of Public Accounts is providing a clearinghouse service in the
distribution of audit reports and corrective action plans to state agencies which provided federal
pass-through funds to local governments. Accordingly, we request that you provide the following
copies of your single audit report as soon as possible:
Copies for distribution to state agencies
Copies for AP A files
Other
In addition, our review of your single audit report indicates that one or more items of
noncompliance and/or weaknesses in internal controls were reported on by your auditors.
Therefore, please forward to this Office the following copies of your corrective action plan
addressing these items as soon as it is available:
Copies for distribution to state agencies
Copies for AP A files
In addition to the copies requested above for distribution to state agencies, copies of your
single audit report and corrective action plan, if applicable, must be submitted directly to the
following federal agencies:
..L Copies to the Single Audit Clearinghouse,
U . S. Bureau of the Census
..L Copies to your cognizant agency
-L Copy to each federal agency providing direct assistance
.
Page Two
Please be advised that failure to meet the requirements of the Single Audit Act may result
in fiscal sanctions against the local government, including withholding of future federal financial
assistance.
Should you have any questions concerning the distribution of single audit reports and
corrective action plans, please do not hesitate to contact me or Cynthia Hartley at (804) 225-3350.
.
I'
.5. Department of
ransportation
ffice of the Secretary
f Transportation
Office of Inspec tor General
Suite 376
1718 Peachtre~. Street, NW
Atlanta, Geo~gia 30309
February 18, 1993
Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have received the audit report for the County of Albemarle,
Virginia, for the year ended June 30, 1992. You were not required
to send our office a copy of the audit report because your County
did not receive direct Federal funding from the U. S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) during the fiscal year.
Single audit has been consolidated in the U.S. DOT in the Atlanta,
Georgia, office. In those years when your County does receive
direct funding from the U. S . DOT, please send one copy of the
financial statements, single audit report, and management letter, if
applicable, to:
National Single Audit Review Center
U. S. Department of Transportation
Office of Inspector General
Suite 376
1718 Peachtree Street, NW
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Should you require technical assistance from our office, thE!
telephone number is (404) 347-1924 or FAX (404) 347-1930.
Gary L. Singleta:
Regional Manager, Region IV
Yr .
....
ROBINSON. FARMER. COX AsSOCIATES
A PROFESSIOXAL CORPORATION
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Date: October 9, 1992
M MORANDUM TO:
County of Albemarle
FROM:
Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates .
~~,~~~
memorandum is a follow-up to our audit of the financial statements of the County
of bemarle for the year ended June 30, 1992. During our audit we became aware of
sev ral matters that we believe should be brought to your attention. This memorandum
is rimarily to communicate our finding to you and request you reply to corrective action
init'ated.
System:
he accounting system, as implemented, is designed to provide internal controls over
nancial management information. In particular instances the separation of this
nancial information within the accounting system does not readily complement
nancial reporting.
uring the preparation of both financial statements and the annual school report
i dividual funds must be consolidated and reported in the school fund. This
onsolidation involves not only actual revenues and expenditures, but also the original
udget as adopted for each fund.
imilar circumstances exist with funds maintained as part of the Federal and State
rant Fund. Although such funds may be maintained internally for management
ontrol purposes, the individual funds should be merged with the appropriate fund
e for financial reporting and preparation of the annual school report where
ppropriate.
he capability of the present accounting system appears to limit the ability to
ummarize and report financial information at levels commensurate with the financial
eporting requirements under the Uniform Financial Reporting Manual. Presently,
reparation of the financial information for both financial and comparative cost
eporting is independent of the accounting system.
e ability to generate the appropriate financial and comparative cost report should
e an extension of the present financial management information system and not as a
irect effort requiring an additional verification and reconciliation process.
~ .
'-
Page 2
A countinl! Svstem: (Continued)
Further, internal control procedures should be. i1l!plemented to ensure consistent
recording of all interfund transactions. Such interfund transactions should be
reconciled on a periodic basis.
k~:
- All bank accounts maintained by the County should be reconciled by accounting in
a timely manner. Several bank accounts are reconciled by individuals outside the
accounting department; however, no procedures exist to verify that these bank
accounts reconcile to the accounting system general ledger.
Transactions of all investments should be recorded in the accounting system and
reconciled to the trustee statements on a monthly basis. The McIntire, LGIP and
capitalize investments capitaline required adjustments at June 30, 1992.
Rpceivable:
- Procedures should be implemented within the accounting system to control various
local tax revenue accounts. This procedure would permit the control over
uncollected billed revenues such as business and professional licenses. Also, any
collected and unremitted revenue could be identified in a timely manner.
o her:
- Payments under capital lease obligations should be identified and recorded in the
debt service fund as principal retirements and interest.
- The purchasing policy manual should indicate the specific number of required
quotes for the purchase of particular goods and/or services. Also, quote sheets may
be used as a method to document the procurement process.
- Job responsibilities/descriptions should be documented to support various personnel
functions within the accounting and finance departments. Consideration should be
given to cross-training personnel for ensured operational support. Further, an
accounting policy and procedures manual should be developed defining all
accounting functions within the accounting system.
- A comprehensive organization chart should be developed that clearly identifies each
functional department with departmental lines of authority.
..
.:.
'-
Page 3
Geheral Fixed Assets:
- Growth within Albemarle County in the next few years may require the issuance of
additional indebtedness to finance needed capital projects. Bond rating agencies
look favorably upon local governments who prepare a Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report in accordance with standards set by the Government Finance
Officers's Association. The major obstacle to the County's issuing such a report is
having a record of its general fixed assets recorded in this audit report. We
recommend the County develop a timetable for the recording of its general fixed
assets and the preparation of a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
I
~.-:J/"_(}
,~..l~,)(~L..l3
Q:L(f:rX2,17
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296.5823
M MORANDUM
Bob Brandenburger, Assistant
County Executive
of Planning and communitYLlUU~
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director
Development
February 22, 1993
Upcoming Review of the Albemarle County Comprehensive
Plan
you are aware, the Department of Planning and Community
velopment 1992-93 Work Program calls for beginning review of
e Comprehensive Plan in the Spring of this year. However, with
o Comprehensive Plan amendment studies now underway for the
huyler area and the Urban Area/Hollymead/Piney Mountain
pansion, and the Utilities Plan, the Housing Report review and
e Fiscal Impact Study still to be completed, we now anticipate
e Comprehensive Plan review will not begin until the Fall of
is year. At such time as this review begins, I would strongly
commend joint worksession(s) of the Planning Commission and the
ard of Supervisors to review goals, objectives, strategies and
commendations to determine which need to be reassessed and/or
vised. I also strongly recommend the two bodies mutually agree
the public participation methods they want utilized in this
ocess. From these decisions, staff will be able to recommend
rk responsibilities and time frame.
cc: David Benish
GOlJNTY OF AL8EMARLe
~. '.~.... ~..'.'.'. .... .."'.' ". ..).., ..>: ..~. '.1"'....'..,;.... ;.;;... "'~...
. . .'" i . . ,.,- ,.';. :,',,, -. \ t" ~'"
'1;}.-iiL~iLLk~~,~t 'UL /'
,,4~' r:i="A 99 1993 ~:.,
'::' ~~~~:\ ~ -. . '-~, t.
., ~ ;,. .,. .
.~,. ~\ '''~,~..''''----_., .,,,,,.--1. ~.. .
I '. '" ,1', , .~, ;, ,~.
"...".~Jt...._( ,~'" .~~..",~.,.4
~ ~""".' _' or' ~,,_ _ ,_ ~""_ .
EXiCUTIVr.: OfflC~
MOTION: Mr. Bain
SECOND: Mrs. Humphris
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1993
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has
convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1
requires a certification by the
Supervisors that such executive
conformity with Virginia law;
of the Code of Virginia
Albemarle County Board of
meeting was conducted in
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.
VOTE:
AYES: Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin, Perkins, Bain
and Bowerman.
NAYS: None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE: None.
ABSENT DURING MEETING: None.
,....--
/'
,-
Cl.,u.v
Albemarle County Boa d of
Supervisors
D\m__~~_~~
--------------
A<Dn\ ITIM ID. -____z.~.!.~q~__Z7
-------------------
MHO\ ITIMN9.E LZ/~_#~(~ic
DEFERRED {MIL X
--- ---
----------------------------------
Form. 3
7/25/86
. ~/
~.
t
.
.~ .'-,::,
~ .~& - q-:j
County of Albemarle
of a Section 8 Advisory
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA DATE:
March 3, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
tJ3 . L'6Ce.J, 1<t
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT
Proposal
Advisory
8 Housing
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:--1L-
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes (1)
--
STAFF CO
Messrs.
Brandenburger, Cilimberg
REVIEWED BY:
BACKG OUND:
At t e direction of the Board of Supervisors, the Planning Commission has been
discu sing the implementation of the Housing Advisory Committee report. Attached are
two 'tems: (1) A summary of the status of Planning Commission review and
reco endations to date, (2) a specific recommendation to establish a Section 8 Housing
Advis ry Committee as outlined in Attachment C of the staff report.
NDATION:
Board approves the establishment of this committee, staff will provide names for
consideration for appointment to the committee.
93.02
ATTACHMENT C
SECTION 8 ADVISORY COMMITTEE OUTLINE
ose of the Committee: To provide specific recommendations for
ctions to improve the utilization of the Section 8 program,
articularly to make the section 8 certificate program more
ttractive to area landlords.
ommittee Product: A brief report would be written outlining
pecific actions which can legally and effectively be taken to
ttract county property owners to be Section 8 landlords.
ommittee Re resentation: The section 8 Advisory Committee should
onsist of up to five members.
section 8 Landlord (property owners)
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or
Virginia Housing Development Authority (VHDA) Section 8
Representative
Section 8 Housing Advisory Board Representatives
Representative from financial, insurance or development fields
to address long-term scenarios and costs.
he County Housing Office/Social Services will participate with
his committee as facilitator. Additional input and expertise can
e obtained by the committee as deemed necessary through guest
peakers, public forums, etc.
ommittee Term: The committee would perform it charge in
pproximately six months: March, 1993 - September, 1993.
ommittee staffin: Primary staff assistance will be provided by
he County Housing Office/Social Services as facilitator. The
epartment of Planning and Community Development and/or the County
ousing Resource Planner at the Thomas Jefferson Planning District
ommission will provide any additional administrative support.
uide for Committee's Work: The following is an informal outline
o guide the work of the committee:
I. Appointment of Committee March
II. Committee Informed on Section 8 Process/HUD March
Regulations
III. Issues and Problems Identified April
- Public forum for input
- Topics, such as:
o Reduce landlord costs
o Streamline landlord administrative efforts
o Create an additional security deposit pool
o Insurance bonds for security deposits
o Tenant training classes
o Methods to raise HUD's Fair Market Rate
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
III.
IX.
o Increasing the county allocation of section
8 units
o Increasing other government funds for
assisted rental housing
Options and Alternatives Generated
Evaluating Alternatives: How implementable;
fair, legally and economically feasible;
possible impacts or conflicts
Draft Recommendations and Priorities
Public Forum on Draft Report
Finalize Report of Specific Recommendation
Meet with Planning Commission in Work Session
May
May
June
July
July
August
~
e Commission recommended funding a full time housing coordinator.
e of the high priority responsibilities of the coordinator should
be the implementation of the Education strategies (The Housing
Committee strategies C1 through C4 below).
is coordinator should be fully funded by the County. Funds
rrently allocated for a part-time position (contract with TJPDC
r one-half of a staff person) should be used towards funding this
w coordinator position.
ob Brandenburger
age 2
ebruary 24, 1993
he Housing Committee Report strategy on mobile homes recommended
ermitting them by-right in the rural and growth areas.
he Planning commission recommended permitting mobile homes by
ight in the Rural Area and Village Residential zoning districts.
he Board recently approved the zoning text amendment implementing
his recommendation. The Planning Commission made no
ecommendation on permitting mobile homes in other zoning districts
t this time, indicating that further investigation be undertaken
nd expert testimony be obtained concerning the effect of mobile
omes on surrounding land, the need for them as low cost housing,
he market demand, and so forth as the underpinning for future
egulatory changes.
et Issues
Planning Commission has made recommendations for funding nine
(9) strategies which they identified as high priorities. These
trategies are listed below along with the Commission's
ecommendations.
Hire a full time housinq coordinator
Establish a citizen's committee to evaluate and
review on an annual basis the process of achieving
affordable housing within Albemarle County. Their
review should include. but not be limited to: new
requlations. policy issues. current need. and the
number of affordable housinq units built. The
Committee should continue to
develop. . . recommendations. . . to improve the
provision of affordable housinq.
T e Commission has identified this strategy as one of the two
h'ghest priorities. Although the establishment of this committee
d es not have direct budget implicatioru;, additional staffing needs
"
ob Brandenburger
age 3
ebruary 24, 1993
re anticipated to be covered by the housing coordinator position
reviously described. The Commission has not discussed
esponsibilities and membership of this committee to date.
Establish a revolvinq fund for emergency repairs to
housinq occupied bv low or moderate income families
he Commission recommends enhancing the County contribution to the
IP Emergency Home Repair Program. The Commission recommends a
ignificant increase in the County funding of this program from
18,000 annually to $90,000 annually, or to the extent that funds
an be efficiently used by AHIP. This recommendation is based on
he belief that this program provides significant short-term
enefits and also reduces long-term cost. Increasing the County's
upport to AHIP can expedite helping those citizens that are
iving in substandard housing today. The funds utilized to fix
. mmediate problems will reduce the costs spent on full
ehabilitation as these repairs may stop or reduce more extensive
amage to the home.
Annuallv rehabilitate or replace a minimum of five
percent of the substandard housinq for low and
moderate income renter or owner occupied
he Commission recommends enhancing funding of AHIP administration
o allow them to increase their capability to undertake additional
ehabilitations. To meet this five percent goal, AHIP would have
o rehabilitate an average of 50 units per year. They currently
a erage 30 units per year.
rrently, the County funds AHIP at approximately $250,000 per year
r administration costs. This funding permits AHIP to receive a
rger share of federal and state monies. By increasing the
ntribution of administrative costs, AHIP can leverage more monies
om other sources because those sources funds go directly to
proving housing conditions. The Planning Commission recommended
creasing funding of AHIP administration to $300,000 per year.
rategy Cl.
Establish an education program to provide household
financial counselinq and inform the public about
available proqrams and resources and Fair Housing
riqhts.
S rategy C2.
Provide education on financial. credit and housing
processes in the hiqh school.
~
ob Brandenburger
age 4
ebruary 24, 1993
trategy C3.
Provide life skill classes. employment training
opportunities and incentive Qroarams for low income
families. with particular emphasis for low income
renters.
trategy C4.
Hold a series of meetinas to educate the general
public on what programs are available and what
needs to be accomplished to provide assisted
housina to the 10% of the community with the lowest
income.
he Commission recommends implementation of the education
trategies, and that their implementation be a primary
esponsibility and priority of the housing coordinator to
acilitate. The Commission wishes to emphasize that the school
rogram be developed and implemented as soon as possible,
referably for the 1993 school year. The Commission believes it is
. portant to provide "life skills" training in the school system.
ese skills will include educating the students in such areas as
savings, balancing a budget, general facts about purchasing a home,
ere to go for financial information and assistance, and how the
anks play a role in their lives. other life skill classes,
e ployment training, maintenance and upkeep, and the skills above,
s ould also be provided for those beyond high school age. There
a e a number of programs currently provided by the private sector
a d non-profit and human service agencies. The housing coordinator
p sition can act as a source of information to the public as to
were to go to seek the information they need versus the County
c eating another paid staff position.
e Commission is requesting the assistance of the Superintendent
Schools, the Director of the Department of Social Services and
e President of the Chamber of Commerce in evaluating the need and
tential for establishing life skill and employment training
ograms to serve school age and adult county residents.
Fl. Establish a revolvina loan fund to benefit County
residents' housina affordability. availability and
condition with consideration for resident income.
e Commission recommends establishing a revolving fund to assist
ose individuals that have the means to make the monthly payments
a home, but lack the opportunity/ability to cover down payment
closing costs. This should be a repayable loan program. The
mmission's recommended funding is $50,000.
tI
ob Brandenburger
age 5
ebruary 24, 1993
eneral Comment: The Commission expressed that AHIP should be
tilized as an overall facilitator of these strategies where
ossible. They have a proven track record of doing an excellent
jOb in providing the services that their funding permits.
Rental Housin
E1. Establish a policy of simultaneouslY building
scattered site assisted rental housing in each
maqisterial district with a maximum of 25 units per
site with the goal beinq the provision of l60 units
of assisted rental public housinq per year for ten
years (total 1600 units) in a manner affordable to
the most needy. Assisted rental housinq should be
built within desiqnated qrowth areas.
he Commission has recommended that the County establish a policy
o encourage and support the provision of assisted rental units
ith particular emphasis to be given to housing the neediest county
esidents. However, the Commission has not approved the final
ording of this policy. That wording will be discussed at their
arch 9 meeting. The Commission's full recommendation will be
orwarded to the Board once approved.
S rategy E2.
A committee of citizens should studY ways that
Section 8 proqram may be made more attractive to
area landlords in order to maximize use of the
proqram. fullY utilize fundinq and improve the
efficiency of ot>erations. The committee should
also explore methods to raise the Fair Market Rate
(allowable rental rates). streamline the landlord's
administrative efforts. and increase the county's
allocation of Section 8 or other government funds
for assisted rental housinq. The committee should
include amonq others: landlords. realtors and low
income residents.
e Commission recommends establishing a Section 8 Advisory
mmittee to evaluate the program and make specific recommendations
r actions to improve the use of the program locally. The
mmission recommended that this committee be established as soon
possible. A proposed outline for the committee and its
sponsibilities is attached (Attachment C).
. )
.> . ATTACHMENT A
HOUSING STRATEGY PC HIGH REVIEWED BY RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS AND STRATEGIES* PRIORITIES PC MADE TO BOS
A. Decent Afford Housing As Key Plan Component
A1. Adopt report strategy in Plan
A2. Full time housing coordinator . . .
A3. Establish evaluation committee . . .
B. Improve condition and supply affd. housing
B1. Emergency home repair fund . . .
B2. Rehab substandard hsing min. standard . . .
B3. land trust and partial equity . .
B4. Create partnership opportunities
BS. Enabling leg./afford/ housing dev.
B6. land bank.
B7. Density bonus
88. Accessory apartments, all districts .
C. Establish housing counseling & education
C1. Education program . . .
C2. High school program . . .
C3. Tenant life sk.ill program . . .
C4. Housing information meetings . .. .
D. Implement Growth Management Policy
01. Increase/expand growth areas .
02. Est. infrastructure cost .
03. Provide/upgrade infrastructure
04. Maxinun residential density used
E. Increase Supply of Assisted Rental Hsing
E1. Establish assisted rental policy . .
E2. Private Section 8 Committee . . .
E3. Non-profit Section 8 assistance .
E4. Housing provision committee .
ES. County 100% of need provision .
F. Assist in Financing Affordable Housing
F1. Establish revolving loan fund . . .
F2. County employer assistance program
F3. Employer assistance committee
F4. Seek. available housing related funds
G. Streamline Development Approval Process
G1. Review ord. for barriers to aff. housing .
G2. Single/double wides by right . . .
G3. Sliding scale/waiver development fees
G4. "One stop shopping" development appl .
GS. Engineering guideline manual
G6. Water/sewerage system flexible standard
G7. Establish data base
H. Obtain Inter-gov. Coordination of Hsing
H1. Participate in regional committee .
H2. Seek. regional fair share agreement
H3. Seek. additional resources
H4. Seek. regional standardized regulation
"
l
V/, -,.
.~ '.,
,
)
I ATTACHMENT BI
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
. 401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-45%
(804) 296-5823
MEM RANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Planning Commission
'\)~
David B. Benish, Chief of Community Development
August 18, 1992
RE:
Planning Commission, Review of Housing Committee Report
The Planning Commission established 19 strategies out of 39 total
in .he Housing Committe~ report as high priorities for
imp ementation. They es~ablished as their highest priority the
consideration of the following two (2) strategies:
A2. Hire a full time housing coordinator
A3. Establish a citizen's committee to evaluate and review on an
annual basis the process of achieving affordable housing
within Albemarle County. Their review should include, but
not be limited to: new regulations, policy issues, current
need, and the number of affordable housing units built. The
Committee should continue: '.J ".~ .J"elop. . . recommendations. . . to
improve the provision of affordable housing.
other 17 high priority strategies are listed below (listed in
r of appearance in the housing report). These strategies
would be undertaken after A2 and A3 are implemented. This
ing does not necessarily reflect any ranking of the Planning
ission.
EGY B1.
Establish a revolving fund for emergency repairs
to housing occupied by low or moderate income
families.
Annually rehabilitate or replace a minimum of five
percent of the substandard housing for low and'
moderate income renter or owner occupied housing
. .
"t,<.,
I ' ,..
, '. ~ihe arle County
Page 2
'August 18, 1992
J
STRA EGY B3.
STRA EGY B4.
STRA EGY CI.
J?,
./
STRA EGY C4.
STRA EGY Dl.
STRA EGY D2.
Pi_.ming Commission
Explore a variety of approaches and encourage the
creation of a non-profit Land Trust where the land
is owned'by the Trust, and the housing unit is
owner-occupied, to facilitate the bUild-up of
partial equity in the property for the homeowner.
(Historically, mobile home parks have served this
role) .
Allow accessory apartments in all zoning district.
(Though the size and form of provision of the
accessory apartments may be limited, every area
would be inclusionary of low and moderate income
residents. )
Establish an educational program to provide
household financial counseling and inform the
public about available programs and resources and
Fair Housing rights.
..
Provide education on financial, credit and housing
processes in" the high school.
Provide life skill classes, employment training
opportunities and incentive programs for low
income families, with particular emphasis for low
income renters.
Hold a series of meetings to educate the general
public on what programs are available and what
needs to be accomplished to provide assisted
housing to the 10% of the community with the
::"'owest income.
Increase the amount of available area within the
growth areas to accommodate future growth.
Calculations of the carrying capacity of growth
areas should include trend analysis .of the amount
of vacant land for sale and densities within
existing developments and consideration of the
fact that limited buildable land area often leads
to higher land prices.
Estimate t~e major infrastructure (water, sewer or
alternative, roads), community facilities
(schools, libraries, police and fire department)
and amenities needs (open space, parks) for'
existing and expanded designated growth areas.
. .
P:~!:;'!..
.1. .
."' ., , .......
.. Alb marle County P~anning Commission
Pag 3
'Aug st 18, 1992
J
STR TEGY E2.
ST
ST TEGY F4.
~,
/
ST TEGY GI.
ST TEGY G2.
ST
H1.
A committee of citizens should study ways the
Section ~ program may be made more attractive to
area landlords in order to maximize use of the
efficiency of operations. The Committee should
also explore methods to raise the Fair Market Rate
(allowable rental rates), streamline the
landlord's administrative efforts, and increase
the county's allocation of Section 8 or other
government funds for assisted rental housing. The
Committee should include among others: landlords,
realtors and low income residents.
Establish a revolving loan fund to benefit county
resident's housing affordability, availability and
condition with consideration for resident income.
Seek all available"housing rel~ted funding from
public (federal and state) and private sources,
including. but not limited to HOME funding,
Farmer's Home Self-Help Housing, Community
Development Block Grants, Federal Home Loan Bank.
..
Review current ordinances and regulations for
consistency with (1) in their treatment of housing
types, (2) in restrictions related to the land and
location or, (3) the creation of barriers to the
provision of affordable housing in relation to
other health, safety and welfare justifications.
Where justifications do not clearly outweigh
housing needs, revise the ordinances and
regulations as needed to allow flexibility without
jeopardizing the balance of health, safety and
welfare.
Allow single and double wide manufactured housing
by right in rural and growth areas if they meed
the criteria consistent with other types of
housing. Cooperation with neighboring
justifications should be sought (See Appendix B).
Centralize, planning, engineering, zoning and
inspections to create a "one stop shopping"
development process.
Continue participation in a regional housing
committee composed of a representative cross-
section of the community to seek cooperation,
.' ,
V':~~iemarle County Pl~nning Conunission
- Page 4 .
August 18, 1992
.
coordination on housing issues, and remain
informed of neighboring policies and regulations
relating to housing.
Sta~f will provide a report which provides information on
alternatives for implementing the strategies, pros and cons of
imp~ementation alternatives, budget implications and staff
recbmmendation for action. Several of these strategies require
separate staff reports and work sessions devoted entirely to
the~. These include the mobile home issue, accessory apartments,
and infrastructure needs/cost estimate. The Commission may wish
to focus in on other strategies in more detail.
Please review this listing to ensure it reflects the Commission's
pos~tion to date. Thank you for your assistance.
DBB I/jcw
-
Q
Q
.f,
I.
,
- .,"~
,.. .,.~ - ~ (;; - cZ3,._.__.
County of Albemarle
AGENDA
Towers
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA DATE:
March 3, 1993
ITEM HUMBER:
QS.O/C0. '79
ACTION:
INFORMATION:~
regulation
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACRMEHTS:
STAFF C
Messrs.
Keeler, Ms. McCulley.
REVIEWED BY:
OUHD:
r January 6th meeting, you deferred discussion on this item until staff could
our ordinances and propose language that would (1) allow a simpler form of
al, other than the Special Use Permit process, (2) encompass monopole as well as
legged towers, and (3) provide guidelines for towers if located in an area
ished for towers.
DISCU SION:
The a tached staff memorandum outlines five broad alternatives for Board consideration
and p oposes additional evaluation and study if the Board chooses to pursue one or more
of th se alternatives.
RECO ATION:
None; for information, discussion and direction to staff.
93.02
tilt y
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
o F
I N TEN T
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Ceunty, Virginia, does hereby state its intent to amend all
aIPlicable sections of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to
rEquire a special use permit for all towers, whether multi-legged
01 monopole; and
FURTHER requests the Albemarle County Planning Commission to
held public hearing on said intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance,
aId does request that the Planning Commission send its recommenda-
t"on to this Board within 45 days.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing, is a true, correct copy of a resolution of intent
unanimously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Co~nty, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on March 3, 1993.
J~~ ~OI~d f/~~ty
Supervisors
"'-
..
:~()b b rc~CJ&~-y) ~i~C:~
-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
ME ORANDUM
TO
FR M:
Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator
Ronald S. Keeler, Chief of Planning ~_
DA E:
February 24, 1993
RE
Towers
Th purpose of this memorandum is to briefly outline five
al ernatives for Board discussion regarding (radio) towers in the
ru al areas. Should the Board choose to pursue one or more
al ernative, additional study and evaluation would be necessary.
t has occurred is that distribution uses (currently cellular
ephone but possibly "wireless" cable in the near future) are now
loying radiowave transmitting towers, whereas, historically
ional transmission uses such as commercial radio and
evision broadcasters were primary users. Due to changes in
unication technology it no longer appears valid to distinguish
ed on function (For this reason, I see no point in amendment to
definitions). All five alternatives assume that towers are to
distinguished only as to structural features (i. e. -height,
hting, etc.) and/or location (i.e.-tower farms).
1. Allow all towers UP to a height of 100 feet bv right. Require
special use permit for towers exceedinq 100 feet in height.
In residential districts, towers and certain other structures
may be erected to a height of 100 feet by right (Additional
setbacks are required. See Section 4.10.3.1). Presumably, if
a 100 foot height is acceptable in residential districts, a
by-right 100 foot height would be acceptable in rural
locations.
This would be the simplest and (probably) most equitable of
the alternatives to implement.
C r'" "
~ -, ~> r'- r-:- ,.
FER 2", ]C)q;l
. .
Am~lia McCulley
Pa~e 2
Fepruary 24, 1993
2. ModifY 1. above in accordance with comments from Centel
Cellular. I understand that Centel Cellular may propose a
greater tower height by right together with supplementary
regulations possibly including restrictions as to tower color,
lighting, and effective broadcast power. This may result in
language tailored to Centel's needs as opposed to a general
amendment. It may be more appropriate for Centel to file a
zoning text amendment.
3. Allow towers by riqht in clusters or "tower farms." Require
special use permit elsewhere. Whether pursued separately or
in combination with 1. above, this alternative would take some
time to fully develop. Specific sites would need to be
identified and spatial limits defined. Likely, this
alternative would carry special regulations normally addressee
through special use permit (i.e.-no lights; red beacon only;
no strobe light). Also additional thought should be given to
the most appropriate mechanism for implementation
(i. e.-supplementary regulations; overlay district; "wholesale"
special use permit). This alternative can have several
optional provisions and approaches.
4. No chanqe. This would not address the issue of disparity of
review based on function or status as opposed to the Physical
aspects of the proposal.
5. Allow radio wave transmittinq towers (includinq "distribution"
towers) only by special use permit. This alternative would be
particularly burdensome for small innocuous towers.
In closing, the simplest and most equitable alternative
of physical considerations) would be alternative
sUIPlementary regulations nor definitions changes
recluired.
(in terms
1. No
would be
FiI ally, I have not sought to include many of the details we
discussed so as not to be confusing nor to impress that
al t ernati ves have been completely analyzed. Under any
cil cumstance, I think that we agreed the reference to "multi-legged
toyers" should be removed.
RSF/jcw
.. ,
.1
i);stributed :0 Beard: ./- z. '7-Cj~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE' It;;;: No. _~1:?(()20?(s.G)
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executi ve '(;/~~)._
Robert B. Brandenburger, Assistant County Executi ve'_l
January 29, 1993
Towers for Cellular Phones
e Board action letter from the January 6, 1993 meeting deferred
is item to the February 3, 1993 meeting to allow staff to draft
nguage that would allow a simpler form of approval, other than
e SUP process, and give certain guidelines for towers located in
area established for towers.
S aff has not completed this work for presentation at this February
3 d meeting and I request the Board defer this to their March 3,
1 93 meeting.
B/dbm
.004
''', -.....~
..,
.
JII"'-...
, .. / ~ 319~
"''','.-rj _"
['..;.....'r. : "u'q;p.O u) 0:_,,,,.. . -- .~-'~~. --.' . /)
...,!l ..~ C?/' ,', (i( . ( c<,
. \' ' '. Z';'<, L I . 1 .-'
,^<Tf.{'" ,!e(fi .' ..J...
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
DepartmentofZon~g
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296.5875
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Bill Fritz, senior Planner
Yolanda Hipski, Planner ~
Amelia G. Mcculley, Zoning Administrator .
FROM:
DATE:
October 22, 1992
RE:
Towers for Cellular Phones
This is in response to your transmittal of October 5th, requesting
a determination on the zoning regulations applicable to cellular
phone towers. This question has arisen in conjunction with two
different proposals, one by Charlottesville Cellular (SP 92-69) and
the other by Centel Cellular.
I have consulted the County Attorney, who has responded with the
attached letter dated October 19th. By this letter, he notes a
reversal in his prior decision on the tower on Con Agra property,
based on our broader ordinance definition of "public utility." He
states that the Virginia Code does not consider a cellular
telephone system licensed by the FCC a public utility.
Our zoning ordinance defines a "public utility" in section 3.0 as
"any plant or equipment for the conveyance of telephone messages
II This would therefore include both of these, and all cellular
phone companies.
s a public utility, they are subject to the following:
Review by the Planning Commission under Virginia Code Section
15.1-456;
) A special permit if it is a mUlti-legged tower. (Note: the by-
right category of use for public utilities specifically excludes
multi-legged towers.) If the tower is a monopole, it is
permitted by-right, with -456 review and a site plan; and
. .
" a
October 22, 1992
Towers for Cellular Phones
Page 2
3} A site plan. This development is not exempt from the site plan
requirement (see Section 32.2.1). Supplementary regulation
5.1.12 applies to this use. ~
Please forward this memorandum to these two applicants. If you
have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
cc: reading file "Cellular Telephone"
AGM/
,
~~~.
;/3. /3rJ~?/
..,.~/
t
~
,
'f .-, I l""~~
C~ -,'~..:\0, ...,j ..."'\
) - I. _,~,t._.,.
Q'1 I )~L :';, (;J
L..w<,.:,L~. "C. c:;. .. . .
A')",,-.., '
COUNTY OF ALBEMARi:E'
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. , County Executive
DATE: February 25, 1993
RE: Piscal and Manaqement options
all of you know, our revenues for FY 93-94 will not reach our
rlier projection and coupled with a re-assessment year that has
me landowners seeing fairly significant increases in their land
-assessment, this will be a fairly difficult budget balancing
ar. Also looming in FY 94-95 is a debt service increase
proaching $1 million due to the new Middle School. Because of
ese factors, I have recently been reviewing other options which
uld provide additional revenues or provide you with a different
proach to justify to our citizens our current program
penditures. The following is a list of various options for
nsideration in our discussion, a couple of which were identified
the Fiscal Resources Committee report three years ago~
. SERVICE DISTRICTS - The Code of Virginia enables localities to
designate areas of the County that receive specific services
not provided in other parts of the County. The Service
District population can be taxed for the service received at
a rate different from that of the remaining population.
Several potential districts that we have identified include:
(I) Transportation Districts - We are receiving more and more
requests for bus service in our urban area primarily
along major corridors. One way that we could provide
that service and ensure that those who recei ve the
service pay for it would be to establish a transportation
service district. The district would encompass the
sUbdivisions, commercial areas, etc. that receive bus
service. This would include those areas in the 29 North
Corridor, those subdivisions and streets that we have
already located bus stops along, and the major commercial
areas such as Fashion Square, Albemarle Square, Rio Hill
and Wal-Mart/Sams. The 250 East Corridor would include
the Pantops Mountain commercial and residential areas.
t }
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors
F~bruary 25, 1993
R~: Fiscal and Xanaqement options
P~ge 2
The areas receiving transportation service would have a
differential tax rate to cover the cost of that service,
applied to the base real estate tax rate. For example,
for those areas listed above, an additional one (l) cent
could be added to the base $.72 rate. (The average
priced home in 1991 was $137,000, which would equate to
$1.15 per month or $13.70 per year.)
(2) Solid Waste - This is also a service whose costs are
increasing substantially. Some have suggested a tip fee
subsidy which could be provided through a service
district. This district would encompass basically the
entire County addressing any tip fee increase or
recycling costs applied accordingly as a service district
levy for solid waste. For the average priced home (1991)
of $137,000, this would equate to $1.15 per month or
$l3.70 per year.
(3) Stormwater Service District This service district
approach has been discussed with you before and would
have the same effect basically as a transportation
district, i.e., stormwater drainage improvements and
maintenance would be provided primarily in the growth
area drainage basin. Those citizens receiving the
benefits from those improvements would be paying a
differential rate.
(4) Fire and Rescue District - This is similar to a solid
waste district since the entire County receives fire and
rescue service from our volunteer companies and/or the
City of Charlottesville. The associated cost of fire and
rescue service could be applied through a differential
rate charge.
(5) GyPSY Moth District - We currently fund the staffing and
a portion of the gypsy moth spraying program from the
General Fund. Since this operation encompasses the
northwest corner of the County, a service district
approach here may be appropriate. However, at the
current annual contribution of $21,500, the savings to
other taxpayers would be insignificant.
~ ile it may appear that since the service, in some of these cases,
Sl ch as fire and rescue and others is already being provided, what
il the difference in the service district approach? Basically, it
il one that identifies for the citizens exactly what service they
a e receiving and the cost of that service being identified by a
.
~
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors
FI~bruary 25, 1993
R~: Piscal and Xanaqement options
P~ge 3
s ~parate tax rate structure in addition to the base real estate tax
r ~te. For any of these districts, however, the logistics of
s~tting up the billing process for the property owners living in
t~ese various districts would be time consuming.
. CABLE TV PRANCHISE - This particular revenue enhancement has
been suggested before. The approximate additional revenue
that we could anticipate is $135,000. As you know, we have,
in the past, decided not to go forward with a cable franchise
tax because of the additional issues and problems associated
with the franchise issue. Again, it is another enhancement
that could be considered.
. RIGHT-SIZING - The right-sizing of the county government is an
attempt to review existing staffing positions/organization and
prioritizing existing programs for possible reduction or
elimination of programs or staff. This also could include
privatization of certain county functions.
. HIRING PREEZE - This is not necessarily a revenue enhancement
but like right-sizing more of an expenditure reduction which
may provide the County with some additional revenue. We have
done this in the past but only on an interim basis during a
fiscal year revenue shortfall. Those departments who lose
staff in the normal course of staff turnover would not be
allowed to fill that position. This could impact some
departments more than others, particularly smaller
departments. Under this option, we would need to identify
those agencies or departments that may be exempt, such as the
Police Department where public safety is involved.
. STATE LEGISLATION - By the time you receive this memo, we will
have additional information regarding various legislation that
is under consideration in the General Assembly. We are
encouraged by a bill that would allow localities to provide
total operating costs, including personnel, to be funded
through the surcharge that we now receive for our Enhanced 911
System. If this legislation is approved, we could shift an
expenditure of between $400,000 and $500,000 from the General
Fund to the surcharge. The E-911 service would then be
provided through the telephone surcharge as a user's fee.
Also, the recordation tax previously withheld will be returned
to the County in the amount of $250,000. The land use
deferral legislation we sought for growth areas has passed and
could provide between $90,000 and $100,000 in new revenue for
FY 95.
I
.
~
A bemarle County Board of Supervisors
F~~bruary 26, 1993
R~: Piscal and Xanaqement options
Pcge 4
Mcny reflect that their taxes are too high and they believe it is
a reflection of our tax rate. For a growing County of our size,
o ~r tax rate is actually fairly low. You should also consider
t'~at, while most look at a rate of $.72, we are actually operating
o~ a $.62 tax rate since $.lO is automatically used to cover the
r~~venue sharing agreement cost. In addition, when you consider the
e~fective tax rate, that being measured by the assessment ratio in
Sc les versus actual assessment, we actually drop down to about a
$ 51 tax rate. For your information, we have provided you with a
tc ble of tax rate comparisons with other jurisdictions. Keep in
m nd that none of these localities have a $.lO obligation on their
t. x rate for sharing their revenue with an adjoining locality, nor
del> as many localities defer as much of their taxable real estate to
a land-use program.
I~ addition to the tax rate table, we have provided the latest
Cel>mparati ve Report of Expendi tures by Function taken from the
S ate's data base. We rank below the average of these selected
lel>calities and Virginia Counties overall in every function but two,
Cll>mmunity Development and Miscellaneous (City Revenue Sharing
AejJreement costs) .
I hope this provides some "food for thought" as well as provide us
w th an opportunity to discuss these issues further as we approach
ol~r budget worksessions.
Rl17T, Jr / dbm
9 .015
A tachment
..
.r
-
c:
CD
E CDI
>--
o as
aa:
E
CD
c:
::::>
UJ
c::
g
.;::
[
E
o
u
CD
ai
a:
~
f-
CD
-
as
a:
x
as
f-
ai
c:
E
o
z
CD
-
as
a:
x
as
f-
CD
>
+:;
(.)
CD
-
W
C\I
0)
0)
_
'0
>.
'3
-.,
-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.
COOI'-('I)C\1
ct)1ri~lriv
tl
C\I
0)
0)
_
COCO coO) C\I
_O)('I)OCO
~c::i~""':c::i
~~~~~
tl
_
0)
0)
_
_COCOO) I'-
_0)('1)01'-
_0__0
~~~~~
o
0)
0)
_
_COCOO) I'-
_0)('1)01'-
_0__0
~~~~~
0)
CO
0)
_
OCOVO)CO
C\IO)vOI'-
_0__0
~~~~~
o
0)
0)
_
C\I CO V coO)
OCO('l)O)CO
_0_00
~~~~~
0)
CO
0)
_
0) 10 0) C\I CO
O)COC\lO)CO
00_00
~~~~~
,~
~
o
..J
E
"~
o~
X (.) CD
as ';:: (.)
't: c: c::
'(ij CD .;::
ILIa.
'0
Q)
:;: c:
... 0
CD_
-0)
~ c:
.c:: ...
U<c
-s.-s.-s.-s.~
COC\l 0)..... 10
('I)vcor-...:~
('I)COOCOC\l
,",,:o)l'-vl'-
.....0000
~~~~~
10 v O('l)C\1
_0)1'-"":1'-
.....0000
~~~~~
1010.....('1) v
_CO~"":I'-
.....0000
~~~~~
IOCOCO('l)C\1
.....COl'-vl'-
.....0000
~~~~~
('1)0..... CO-
o COCO ('I) CO
.....0000
~~~~~
.....10010('1)
OI'-CO('l)CO
.....0000
~~~~~
~as
CD c: ~ 'c ~
~ ::J 0 as <<i
OOO)..:!:E
C:'OE~CD
as::JO:t::.o
~3~ii:~
-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.
C\IC\1IO('I)CO
cO~r-...:Irir-...:
C\II'-_O)CO
CO CO 1'-0) 10
. . . . .
00000
~~~~~
v CO CO 0) CO
10 I'-COO) 10
. . . .
00000
~~~~~
VCOCOO)CO
10 I'-COO) 10
00000
~~~~~
vC\l 10 lOCO
IOI'-COC\lIO
000"':0
~~~~~
0).....1'-0)10
vCOIOCOv
00000
~~~~~
vCOvC\lCO
VIOVO)"":
00000
~~~~~
...
CD
>.>
... 0
c: c:
CD as
II
E
as
.c::
0)'0
c: ...
.- 0
~=
(.) as
0_
a: en
-s.-s.-s.-s.-s.
o)I'-IOI'-CO
.....r-...:CO~N
..... .....
COOC\l('l)CO
IOl'-vO)('I)
00000
~~~~~
co 0 C\I CO CO
IOl'-vCO('l)
00000
~~~~~
COO..... ('1)0)
IOI'-IOCO('l)
00000
~~~~~
COO..... C\I 0)
IOI'-IOCO('l)
00000
~~~~~
('1)('1)01'-
~~"":CO
0000
~~~~
IOCOC\lC\l
lOCO v 10
0000
~~~~
as
-
UJ
::J
0)
::J
<C
c:
o
Q) C, Q) Q5
~ .~ -8. "S
~~Eg~
~~~.f~
~
o
10
~
_
.....
.....
~
.....
_
.....
~
.....
.....
.....
~
('I)
'"":
_
~
co
0)
o
~
co
0)
o
~
~
'S;
UJ
CD
:t::
o
-.::
as
.c::
U
UJ
as
CD
...
<C
'0
CD
UJ 0
CD CD
~Q)
...en
~~
~
C\I
cO
~
v
cO
_
CO
o
~
I'-
CO
o
~
o
CO
o
...
I'-
CO
o
~
_
CO
o
~
CO
CO
o
~
_
CO
o
~
0)
CO
o
...
0)
CO
o
~
10
10
o
...
I'-
CO
o
~
(h
o
~
UJ
CD
'~
c::
::J
o
U
as
'c
'0,
...
:>
...
o
IL
cD
E
.~
.~
.c::
-
-
as
CD
:0
~
'(ij
>
as
-
o
c:
CD
...
as
UJ
CD
-
as
...
X
as
-
CD
>
'p
(.)
CD
::::
CD
C\I
0)
0)
.....
'0
c:
as
.....
0)
0)
.....
..
oj ~
c:
o
'';::
(.)
c:
::l
U.
>-
.0
I/)
0)
....
::l
-
'5
c:
0)
0-
X
W
-
o
-
....
o
0-
0)
a:
0)
>
'';::
ro
.....
ro
0-
E
o
o
.....
Cf>
Cf>
c:
ro
Q5
(.)
I/)
~
E
E
o
()
~
(.)
0)
a:
I
ro
(.)
::l
"0
W
..c:
-
~
0)
I
.2
.0
::l
a.
,2
.0
::l
a.
~
'(3
'5
::l
-,
~
.....
0)
c:
0)
(!)
I/)
0)
....
::l
~~
o c:
I- 0)
0-
X
W
.... ~
0) '5.
Q. ro
()
ro
.... -
0) '5.
a. ro
()
ro
.... -
0) '0.
a. ro
o
ro
.... -
0) '0.
a. ro
()
ro
.... -
0) '5.
a. ro
()
ro
.... -
0) . 0.
a. ro
o
ro
.... -
0) '5.
a. ro
o
ro
.... -
0) '5.
a. ro
o
ro
.... -
0) '5.
a. ro
o
o
()
"0
0)
-
(.)
0)
Q5
C/)
LOLOLO<O.....
.....C\ICOC\lLO
":LO,,":q"!.
O............CO<O
...................LOC\I
~.......~q~
.......v.......v.....
Cf>Cf><OCO('t)
~C\I('t)C\I('t)
00000
00000
00000
vLO.....('t)<O
~VVC'!""'"
Or--:............V
............C\IC\1C\1
.....
<OCO<OvC\l
LOO('t)C\I.......
LOLOLriC\lCO
.......LO('t)('t)LO
.......COCf>CO('t)
~CO~~('t)
('t)O.....<OCO
LO<O<O.....O
q.......OCf>.......
0'> <OC\I CO.......
LOC\I C\I CO.......
.......C\Iv.......M
('t)COC\lCO.......
C\I C\I
v............OLO
LO<OCf>~<O
.......O'>O'>v.....
LOCf><O('t)('t)
.....
<Ov..............O
C\I('t)('t)<O('t)
C\I('t)v.....LO
LO('t).......O'>LO
C\IC\1C\1.....('t)
<O.....COC\l.......
,,?LOLO.....LO
OC\lr--:O<O
C\lC\lC\lC\l('t)
Cf>Cf>0('t)Cf>
<OvCf>..............
('t).....C\I('t)Cf>
COCOCOLOv
.....
E
.~ "0
Q5
o~'E
x (.) 0) ~
~.;:: (.) I/)
.... c: c: 0)
'Cij 0) .;:: ..c:
LLIa.O
O.....C\I.......v
COCOCO............
..... ~ ": q v.
LOC\lO<OCO
...................Cf>C\l
LOLOCf>.....~
.......LOvvCO
Cf><OLOLO.......
.....
OOOCOO'>
000('t).....
0000.....
V
............O('t).......
O<OV<OC\l
C\ILOCf>('t)Lri
y-o-.,.- ,.-(Y)
.....
OC\l..........('t)
('t)('t)C\I('t).....
('t).....cO<OcO
('t)co ('t)
.....('t)('t)('t)C\1
0.....C\l~0
o LO COCO <0
('t)('t)v<O.......
COOLO..............
LO..... <00'> 0
............<0 0'>
OLOLOLOcO
<00<0..............
C\I
VC\lO.....O
<O...................LO
OLO.....C\IC\1
Cf>.......C\IC\1C\l
.....
00 LO....... 0'>
C\I('t)LOC\IC\I
LOM.....LOO
C\I0 v ('t)0'>
C\I
COCOLOC\lCO
Cf>LO.......vLO
.....Or--:C\ICO
C\lC\l ('t).....
.....v.....vO'>
('t)LOC\lO.......
LOLO('t)O('t)
LOCO('t)C\ILO
c:
o
-
0>
c:
";::
<e
>-
..... ro
0) ,- 0)
O)c:ES,,;::
~ ::l 0 '" ro
o08>~E
C:"Oc: I/) 0)
ro ::l 0 ::: .0
&3~a::<
CO LO....... COLO
Cf> <0....... CO CO
V.~CO.....~
LO<O.....<Ov
.......COvCf>LO
........qq.....<o
('t)O.......C\ILO
LO.......LOCOLO
00000
00000
00000
.....COC\l.......<O
.....0'> LOC\I <0
r--:('t).....Cf>Cf>
C\I..........
00'><0 ('t) 0
<O('t).......('t)('t)
<0..... v <0<0
C\I V
LO.......vCOCf>
00....... ('t)Cf> LO
r--:Cf>VC\lV
Cf>.......Cf><Ooo
<O..............Cf>.......
.......CO('t).....C\1
vC\lOO.......
C\IvC\lLOO
..............<0.......<0
Cf>..............C\I0
""'voo<OLO
Cf>r--:OCOO
C\I('t)C\I('t)('t)
LO<O.......C\I<O
vLOOC\loo
ooC\l.....CO.....
"""'0 LO..... CO
..-
o LOCf>('t) v
oo<OO'>r:Cf>
('t)C\ICf>.....<O
.......... .....
C\I0<O('t).....
Cf>0..............('t)
cOLOr--:Or--:
C\ILOC\l.......C\l
....
0)
>->
..... 0
c: c:
0) ro
II
E
ro
..c:
0>"0 ro
C '- en
~ J2 ::l
(.) - 0>
o ~ ::l
a:C/)<e
CO.....LO.......CO
O('t).......LO.....
~~....._C\I~
vC\l('t)('t).....
.....('t)CO.......LO
~~"":......._~
Cf>vv.....v
vvv<OLO
00000
00000
00000
C\I('t)O'>LOO
vCOO<OO
C\I<O v ('t)cO
..... C\Iv
('t).....Cf>Cf>C\1
<O.....OooLO
<OLOLOC\IC\I
C\I('t)C\1
('t)('t)Cf>VO
Cf>.......~OLO
<OC\lCOCO<O
Cf>vooCf><O
..............<OCOO'>
.....0'><00'><0
CO~<OCf>C\1
('t)COC\lO'>('t)
.....Cf>co.....C\1
..... .....
('t)..............LO('t)
..............v<O.......
Cf>Ov<Ov
~C\I('t)('t).....
.....
OCO<OLOv
v<OC\I
OOOvO'>
LOLOLOCOv
LO<OvCOC\l
C\ILOLO('t)oo
~('t)OCOv
.,- .,.- ,.- ,.... ,.-
v 0....... C\ICO
('t)LO <Ov
LOv('t)('t)<O
C\lC\l('t)LO('t)
c:
o
0) 15> Q5 Q;
c: .0 .-
== :c 0- 6- 0)
~ I/) E ::l I/)
~~8~~
co
v
CO
<0
<0
C\I
V
.......
o
o
o
o
CO
('t)
('t)
.......
LO
('t)
.....
.....
.......
.......
o
.....
0'>
('t)
~
CO
C\I
C\I
.......
C\I
00
.......
.....
.....
.......
V
V
C\I
<0
('t)
CO
C\I
<0
o
('t)
o
.....
~
.S>
I/)
0)
-
(5
";::
ro
..c:
()
"0
0)
-
I/) (.)
0) 0)
g'Q5
....(/)
0) ....
> 0
<eLL
v
.....
~
...r
o
"!.
0'>
CO
.....
o
CO
LO
r-:
<0
"!.
.......
LO
co
O?
.....
o
~
.....
LO
.......
o
('t)
o
O?
LO
('t)
o
LO
0'>
~
.....
...r
.....
...r
LO
...r
N
('t)
CO
('t)
<0
o
<0
CO
o
~
...r
.....
.....
o
~
('t)
('t)
.....
C\l
.......
N
<0
('t)
<0
LO
.......
C\l
<0
LO
~
...r
LO
.....
.....
('t)
.....
('t)
C\l
CO
.....
LO
.....
o
C\l
.....
C\I
<0
0'>
('t)
<0
.....
<0
o
()
.~
c:
'0,
....
:>
....
o
LL
C\I
Cf>
-
<0
o
-
.....
.....
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
Form.3
7/25/86
1./1) ,
'/J '- -1"'" ,1
/ ( ///L r i
/"
,A
,">)
:....:_.; i,Of').
.t /:'
1 )
,A
;,,/j
'"-"
,
." -- ~
_.,/-: A/!
I.... ~: ,,,~_._.I'l '-/
- -~/
i<<) [}
,'/'
( ,.: d. i
" ' /.;,-".(.--->,
'7
..'
J'
Edward H. Sa n, Jr.
Samuel Mill r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsville
David P. Bow rman
Charlottesvil
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y umphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO
Melvin Breeden, Director
Finance Department
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC (::JU C
March 4, 1993
Appropriation Requests
At its meeting on March 3, 1993, the Board of Supervisors approved the
fo lowing appropriation requests:
Agenda Item No. 7b. Discussion: Langford Farms Subdivision. APPROPRIATED
$2 ,000 to fund road improvements to Montgomery Lane and Pippin Lane in Langford
Fa s Subdivision. Attached is the signed appropriation form.
Agenda Item No. 17. Presentation of 1991-92 Audit.
Mr. Bain asked what would be the cost to develop a fixed asset inventory
th t would eliminate the qualifying statement in the County's audit. He also
re uested a meeting of the Audit Committee, Auditors and Mr. Breeden to look at
th best alternative available for eliminating that statement
Agenda Item No. 18. Discussion: Tax Relief for the Elderly and Totally
an Permanently Disabled.
SET a public hearing for April 7, 1993, at 10:15 a.m., to amend Sections
8- 6 and 8-27 of the County Code, to raise the income and asset levels on tax
re ief for the elderly and permanently and totally disabled based on Option 2
se out in the staff report.
Staff to consider legislation that would provide graduated deferment based
on income for all citizens.
*
Printed on recycled paper
I
. I
,
Memo To:
Date:
Page 2
Melvin Breeden
March 4, 1993
Staff to give a list of options for possible tax relief that could be
discussed with the State legislators.
Agenda Item No. 19a. Appropriation: Community Attention. APPROVED a
request to appropriate $12,000 to Community Attention to partially offset a
1c91-92 funding deficit incurred by Albemarle County youth. Attached is the
staff report on this item. Please provide the necessary form.
Agenda Item No. 19b. Appropriation: FY 1991-92 Year-End Adjustments.
AIPROVED the attached appropriation requests to reflect FY 1991-92 year-end
adjustments.
r
Agenda Item No. 19c. Appropriation: AHIP. APPROVED the attached appro-
priation request of $7190 to AHIP from AHIP's Contingency Fund in the Board's
b~dget for an emergency repair carpenter,
Agenda Item No. 19d.
tre attached appropriation
Station CIP Project to the
tcring.
Appropriation: Keene Landfill Monitoring. APPROVED
request to transfer funds from the Keene Transfer
General Fund for Keene Landfill water quality moni-
Agenda Item No. 1ge. Appropriation: Elis Ollson Memorial Foundation
GIant. APPROVED the attached appropriation request to reflect a $3000 grant
received from the E1is Ollson Memorial Foundation for "Project Success".
Agenda Item No. 19f. Appropriation: Family Literacy Grant. APPROVED the
attached appropriation request to reflect a $21,230 Family Literacy Grant
received for the Family Literacy Project.
Agenda Item No. 199. Appropriation: Teacher Incentive Grants from the
Virginia Commission for the Arts for Stony Point Elementary School. APPROVED
tbe attached appropriation request to reflect $700 received for Teacher Incen-
ti~e Grants from the Virginia Commission for the Arts for Stony Point Elementary
Sclhool.
Agenda Item No. 19h. Appropriation: Albemarle High School Food Service.
AP~ROVED the attached reappropriation request in the amount of $1,969.67 for new
eq~ipment for Albemarle High School Food Service.
Agenda Item No. 19i. Appropriation: ADA Compliance - Parks and Recrea-
tipn. APPROVED the attached appropriation request to transfer $79,995.46 to ADA
Co~pliance - Parks and Recreation.
..
Mama To:
D"tte:
P<j.ge 3
I
Melvin Breeden
March 4, 1993
Agenda Item No. 19j. Appropriation: Sheriff's Bailiff. APPROVED the
a tached appropriation request to transfer $13,785 from the Board's Contingency
F d to cover six months of the County's share of an additional bailiff in the
J venile and Domestic Relations Court.
tachments (17)
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
Robert B. Brandenburger
Roxanne White
Robert W. Paskel
Tracy Holt
Jo Higgins
Pat Mullaney
File
. ,-
,
L..
c:; ~. 067 -93_.".<_
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA ITLE:
Appropr ation Request - Community Attention
February 3, 1993
(?3,()~5.i5
ACTION:----1L-
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT PROPOSAL RE UEST:
Request to appropriate $12,000 to partially
offset Community Attention's 1991-1992
funding deficit for Albemarle County youth.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
White
A<TACBMENTS: ~ ~
REVIEWED BY/rf1VI
-
BACKGRO
This ap ropriation request for $12,000 is to partially reimburse Community Attention for a
1991/92 deficit of $22,442 for residential services provided to Albemarle County youth during
the pas fiscal year. For FY 1991/92, the County appropriated $50,200 to be used in
Communi y Attention's programs, although by the end of the fiscal year, Albemarle youth had
receive approximately $73,620 of services, incurring a deficit of approximately $22,500.
DISCUSS ON:
This sh rtfall occurred because Community Attention accepted a large number of Albemarle
youths airly late in the year, 6 in January, 6 in February, 5 in March, 5 in April, 2 in May
and 2 i June. When referrals are accepted and the child is taken into residential care,
Communi y Attention can not always anticipate the level of services needed or how long that
particu ar child will need to stay. In FY 91/92, the length of stays were longer than usual,
and Co unity Attention does not discharge a child before they are ready to return to their
homes s mply for a shortage of funds.
Inheren in this policy of not refusing Albemarle County youths (Social Services attests to
their w'llingness to accept even the most difficult Albemarle County youths), and not being
willing to terminate a child's stay, is the difficulty of predicting actual service needs for
the nex fiscal year.
Since 1 87-88, community Attention has fluctuated between incurring deficits and not using
their t tal appropriation:
Year Appropriation Total Services Total Billed Over/Under Appropriation
1987-88 24,360 $33,410 $23,226 (9,050)
1988-89 29,855 31,038 28,822 (1,183)
1989-90 31,646 23,542 23,542 8,104
1990-91 37,420 34,240 34,240 3,180
1991-92 50,200 73,622 50,180 (23,442)
...: ,
AGENDA ~ ITLE:
Appropr'ation Request - Community Attention
Februar, 3, 1993
Page 2
As you pan see from the chart, approximately $11,284 has been appropriated to Community
Attenticn over the past 5 years, but not collected. It is this amount that staff recommends
reappro]riating to community Attention to at least partially offset the 91/92 deficit of
$22,500 The remainder of the deficit may be able to be absorbed in the current year,
althougl with the increasing number of Albemarle youth in need of residential service, this
may not be a realistic expectation.
RECOMMEIIDATION:
Based o~ Community Attention I s service to Albemarle County youth, staff recommends an
appropr'ation of $12,000 to offset the 91/92 deficit incurred by Albemarle County youth.
93.018
cc: Jack Gallagher
(./
"\
Edward H, Bin, Jr.
Samuel Mi er
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P, Bo erman
Char\ottesv lie
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y, umphris
Jack Jouet
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
F OM:
Melvin Breeden, Director
Finance Department
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~
T
s
March 11, 1993
D
Appropriation for Community Attention
At its meeting on March 3, 1993, the Board of Supervisors
PROVED a request to appropriate $12,000 to Community Attention to
rtially offset a 1991-92 funding deficit incurred by Albemarle
unty youth. Attached is the signed appropriation form.
tachment (1)
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
*
Printed on recycled paper
.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCF>.L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920059
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVE~TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
GENERAL
PURPpSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDI~IONAL FUNDING FOR COMMUNITY ATTENTION TO OFFSET FY 91/92 DEFICIT.
~XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
1100P39000563500 COMMUNITY ATTENTION $12,000.00
1100P95000999990 CONTINGENCY-BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS (12,000.00)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
**** *******************************************************************
REQU~STING COST CENTER:
APPRC])VALS :
DIRECt-TOR OF FINANCE
BOARI~ OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
SIGNATURE
DATE
~~.&~ .,-_4-___
(() 0.4 ]ArC~
~ - S - ?.3
q - 9 - 93
...... 'J'" ..
~. ''';-'',:c')'3
Oistribute<t~~~ ..wr~-:J.ftA;.#-.
f)'l 6~'M'~ ~,'
Agenda It. No. ~,-,~_..;;"'ue.
l:.. . ~"" "
t.. J,^ N 1 L. 100?,
~, .,. " "'\
i.
k :~
~. ,-~-
. I J .,. t ' :' .~. . > L...
EXl:.CUi i .,." ~ Vi ,IV
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance
~
January 13, 1993
FY 91/92 Year End Adjustments - Appropriation
Based on the final audit adjustments, attached are several
a propriations for FY 91/92.
Grant - #910069
Expenditures totaled $27,787.10 and were funded from non-local
sources.
derate Rehab - #910062
Assistance payments totaled $904,962.65 and was totally funded
from the Federal Grant.
S Cafeteria - #910065
Based on the change in method of operation, a new fund was
established to track operations. Expenditures totaled
$270,099.25 with revenues of $274,732.83.
vC
apter I - #910066
Activities in this program exceeded the prior appropriation by
$89,770.32. These expenditures were funded by additional
Federal revenues totaling $88,407.98 and the remaining
$1,362.34 from prior year carryover funds.
rant - #910067
Activities exceeded prior appropriations by $3,195.60; funded
from $3,063.74 in additional Federal revenues and $131.86 from
prior year carryover.
,.-~
..
R'chard E. Huff, II
J nuary 13, 1993
P ge Two
~ Grant - #910064
Expenditures in this program exceeded grant revenues by
$796.89. This appropriation authorizes the transfer of this
amount from the School Fund to cover the revenue shortfall.
cmmunity Education - #910068
Expenditures in this program exceeded prior appropriation by
$27,860.30 to be funded from program revenues which exceeded
estimates by $70,158.91.
Hopefully this completes all transactions for FY 91/92.
ease contact me if you need any additional information.
BIbs
tachments
Tracey Holt
, .
FISC L YEAR
91/92
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
NUMBER
910069
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
MPO GRANT
PURP SE OF APPROPRIATION:
APPR VAL OF FY 91/92 EXPENDITURES.
XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
1120 81201110000 ADM-SALARIES $1,532.10
1120 81201601700 ADM-COPY SUPPLIES 18.42
1120 81208350000 MARKETING-PRINTING 7,500.00
1120 81209110000 COMP INFO-SALARIES 6,780.80
1120 81209130000 COMP INFO-P/T WAGES 5,899.18
1120 81303310000 LONG RANGE-PROF. SERVICES 645.27
1120 81306110000 TSM PLAN-SALARIES 5,125.58
1120 81306130000 TSM PLAN-P/T WAGES 285.75
TOTAL
$27,787.10
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2120816000169900 MPO GRANT-OTHER CHARGES $15,742.25
21208 4000240500 MPO GRANT-STATE 976.61
21208 3000330001 MPO GRANT-FEDERAL 11,068.24
TOTAL
$27,787.10
******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
FINANCE
OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~~~/9 ~~~_
!j7ek t1/ Cj
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
/-/../' -?"T
- ,
3'-4-93
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCIL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910062
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVEITISEMENT REQUIRED?
YES
NO X
FUND
MODERATE REHAB GRANT
PURPCSE OF APPROPRIATION:
APPRCVAL OF FY 91/92 EXPENDITURES.
I XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****,*******************************************************************
1122"81920579001 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS $882,432.94
1122 81920579002 VACANCY LOSS PAYMENTS 3,244.20
1122" 81920579003 DAMAGE/UNPAID RENT 1,886.51
1122"81920579004 UTILITY REIMBURSEMENTS 16,999.00
1122 81910312800 AUDIT 400.00
TOTAL
$904,962.65
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****,*******************************************************************
2122"33000330001 MODERATE REHAB GRANT-FEDERAL $888,935.39
2122 51000510100 FUND BALANCE 16,027.26
TOTAL
$904,962.65
****,*******************************************************************
REQUISTING COST CENTER:
APPRCVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARI OF SUPERVISORS
FINANCE
SIGNATURE
DATE
~~~~a_
VtL it) {Jad1
I -V-9Y
=i'-l-93
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910065
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
1300
YES
NO X
AHS CAFETERIA
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
60301119300 SALARIES-FOOD SERVICE $75,024.24
60301160900 SALARY RESERVE-BONUS 2,019.80
60301210000 FICA 5,524.35
60301221000 RETIREMENT 4,654.67
60301231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 1,945.10
60301232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 154.00
60301241000 LIFE INSURANCE 309.76
60301242000 GROUP LIFE/PART-TIME 99.18
60301271000 SELF INSURED 1,549.21
60301520301 TELEPHONE-LOCAL 1.42
60301520302 TELEPHONE-LONG DISTANCE 1.54
60301550400 TRAVEL-EDUCATION 441.18
60301600000 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 4,623.15
60301600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 266.56
60301600200 FOOD SUPPLIES 148,864.01
60301600700 REPAIR & MAINT. 260.46
60301601100 UNIFORMS & APPAREL 147.00
60301800100 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 24,213.62
TOTAL
$270,099.25
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2300 60301161204 CAFETERIA SALES $270,099.25
BO
TOTAL
$270,099.25
*******************************************************************
STING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
J-/;~.3
'-~- 4- 93
OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910066
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO X
CHAPTER I
PURP SE OF APPROPRIATION:
APPR VAL OF FY 91/92 EXPENDITURES.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
61101112100 SALARIES-TEACHER $48,000.00
61101601300 EDUC & REC SUPPLIES 18,770.32
61311111400 SALARIES-OTHER MANAGEMENT 23,000.00
TOTAL
$89,770.32
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2310 33000330101 FEDERAL REVENUES $88,407.98
2310 51000510100 FUND BALANCE 1,362.34
TOTAL
$89,770.32
**** *******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
I-/":!' -9$
:1- &f- 93
SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCJlL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910067
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVEITISEMENT REQUIRED?
YES
NO X
FUND
MIGRANT
PURP(SE OF APPROPRIATION:
APPR(VAL OF FY 91/92 EXPENDITURES.
1 XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****1*******************************************************************
1310. 61101112100 SALARIES-TEACHER $3,195.60
TOTAL
$3,195.60
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2310 33000330102 FEDERAL REVENUES $3,063.74
2310 51000510100 FUND BALANCE 131.86
TOTAL
$3,195.60
**** *******************************************************************
REQU~STING COST CENTER:
APPR(~VALS :
DIRE(~TOR OF FINANCE
BOARI~ OF SUPERVISORS
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
t:t:: t;;;
/_/,?-?:S
3 - 4--- 9"3
,..
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC1L YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910064
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVEFTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCH/PROC APP (PAL)
PURPCSE OF APPROPRIATION:
APPRC~AL OF FY 91/92 EXPENDITURES.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1320361311580000 PROCESS APPROACH GRANT-MISC $796.89
1200060000930200
TRANS TO GRANT-(PAL)
796.89
TOTAL
$1,593.78
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*****~******************************************************************
23203~1000512001 TRANSFER FROM SCHOOL FUND $796.89
22000~1000510102 SCHOOL FUND BALANCE 796.89
TOTAL
$1,593.78
***** ******************************************************************
REQUE~TING COST CENTER:
APPRO'ALS:
DIREC'lOR OF FINANCE
FINANCE
SIGNATURE
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~~/9~~L__
fl/4. JIlL (/a 1.(;
/-.I~-'7::5
~) -f-f'3
I'
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
TYPE F APPROPRIATION
YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910068
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVER ISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
FUND
COMMUNITY EDUC
E OF APPROPRIATION:
AL OF FY 91/92 EXPENDITURES.
PENDITURE
COST ENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1330063300132100 SALARIES-TEACHER $27,860.30
$27,860.30
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2330 60000161201 TUITION-PRIVATE SOURCES $27,860.30
TOTAL
TOTAL
$27,860.30
**** *******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
~~t;::-
/ - / :!f: -9.;::.
.
OF SUPERVISORS
_~-1-9.:J
.
~~'i ...~ ~-:J :,- '~-q;' , '- :';:.:"',
~........ 1 -'I2+._..~,-_......"""'~--Nlo'''''''''
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
I
AGENDA ITLE:
AHIP Ap ropriation
I
AGENDA DATE:
March 3, 1993,
ITEM NUMBER:
93,u3::r3.B;'
SUBJECT PROPOSAL RE DEST:
Request to appropriate $7,190 to AHIP from
AHIP's qontingency account in the Board's
budget lEor an Emergency Repair Carpenter
positior)
ACTION: --X-
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
REVIEWED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
White
I
I
BACK ROUND:
Duri g the FY 92-93 budget process, AHIP was unsure about the availability of other funds
to'i crease their part-time Emergency Repair carpenter to a full-time position. Due to
this !uncertainty, $14,385 was placed ,in an AHIP contingency account in the Board's Qudget
unti~ other funding sources were secured.
,
In Al'gust, AHIP requested that $7,195 of the funds be appropriated for the position since
the nly probable funding source at that time was United Way and, even if granted, the
fund would not be available until January, 1993. Since that time, United Way has not met
theiJ:j- expanded fund raising goal and AHIP will not receive any new funding for the
carp~nter position. For this reason, AHIP has requested that the County release the
rema~ning $7,190 to fund the fourth quarter expenses of the Emergency Repair Carpenter.
I
I
I
RECO ATION:
Staf concurs with the request and recommends approval of the appropriation of $7,190 to
AHIP Ifrom the Board's AHIP contingency line-item.
I
jbt ,
93.0212
I
Atta9hments
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
..
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920046
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
GENERAL
PURP SE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDI IONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR AHIP.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
1100 89000563100 AHIP $7,190.00
1100 11010999999 BD OF SUPV-CONTINGENCY (7,190.00)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
$0.00
TOTAL
$0.00
**** *******************************************************************
STING COST CENTER:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF SUPERVISORS
~~-~
/ i . ,1J'.- 1.JA;
'?-/b-,?3
3-L) f3
DIRE TOR OF FINANCE
, ..
e,i ..~.~..~:~;.'~('L2i__~,---~,
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA T
Appropri
- Keene Landfill Monitoring
AGENDA DATE:
March 3, 1993
ITEM NUMBER:
()/J ,'" .~ <^''V
"l').()~'{)~ I~)O
ACTION:--1L-
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT
General
quality
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
--
STAFF C
Messrs.
REVIEWED BY:
Brandenburger, Ms. Higgins
BACKGRO
The Keen landfill is under Phase II water quality monitoring that will be completed in June,
1993. T is requires quarterly testing that is mandated by the Virginia Department of Waste
Manageme t. Phase II testing and monitoring costs are estimated at $100,000 per quarter.
An addit'onal $150,000 is required in the operating budget to cover these costs through this
fiscal y are
or this Phase II monitoring is available from the Keene Transfer Station CIP project
cancelled by the Board last October.
RECOMME ATION:
Approve he appropriation of $150,000 from the Keene Transfer Station CIP to the General Fund
to cover the operating costs for the Phase II water quality monitoring.
93.010
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC
YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920038
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
CAPITAL/GENERAL
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
FER OF FUNDS FROM CIP KEENE PROJECT TO ENGINEERING FOR KEENE WATER
TY MONITORING.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
42040390001 GEN'L-KEENE WATER MONITORING $150,000.00
41000950037
CIP-KEENE TRANSFER STATION
(150,000.00)
(150,000.00)
9301093004
GEN'L-TRANSFER TO CIP
TOTAL
($150,000.00)
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2900 51000512004 CIP-TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND ($150,000.00)
TOTAL
($150,000.00)
*******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
ENGINEERING
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
/.. ~,? - 9~
3 --1-/93
BO
OF SUPERVISORS
:.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
T
Robert B. Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
January 22, 1993
Keene Transfer station
Based on the request of Jo Higgins I have completed the
tached appropriation form to transfer funds from the CIP - Keene
ansfer station to the General Fund for the Keene Water Quality
nitoring.
This action will simply reduce the General Fund annual
t ansfer to CIP since those funds have not been transferred at this
t me.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
BIbs
tachment
: Jo Higgins
Ed Koonce
C.' ';:T:
"IAN 25 1001
< .
,
.. ,
IJlsrrRlBl1:1'EtJJl'~:aOA~~IiI~P?-~0 - 9.3
W:~~\'I'+,..*t'4'~:' .~3!fi(~!.'l1
" q~ 0003 (10
ALBEMARLE COUN1Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
February 2, 1993
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Robert W. Paskel, Division superintenden~
RE: Request for Appropriation
Please accept my apologies for the lateness of this request for
ap ropriation. The agenda items for these two grants were inadvertently
filed before the request for appropriation memorandum had been completed.
At its meeting on october 12, 1992 the School Board approved the
following two grants:
q~o?f;? jCf
q1;I/!;();. 0
.
A $3,000.00 grant from the Elis Ollson Memorial Foundation
for "Project Success". This project was started at Albemarle
High School several years ago for ninth grade students who
were identified by the middle schools as being students who
were more than likely to be unsuccessful at the high school
and potential drop outs. Students who successfully completed
the ninth grade year in "Project Success" are now in classes
that do not provide the same amount of personalized support.
Teachers will be paid from this grant to monitor and support
these students as needed. This "after-care" helps to keep
identified students more successful in the tenth, eleventh,
and twelfth grade years.
A Family Literacy Grant in the amount of $21,230.00. The School
Board approved the grant application for the Family Literacy
project at its March 23, 1991 Board Meeting. The application was
subsequently approved by the State Department of Education.
Albemarle County Schools received $21,230 from the State
Department Office of Adult Education to fund the Family Literacy
Project during the 1992-93 school year. Matching funds of
$2,659.00 from the County are represented by use of office space,
telephone services and copying services in the County Office
Building as well as donations from civic, business and church
organizations. The project proposal funds Literacy Education
for Chapter I and Migrant families. Instructors will visit the
homes of Chapter I and Migrant families to help them improve
their language, reading and parenting skills.
o
It is requested that the Board of Supervisors amend the appropriation
o dinance to receive and disburse these funds as displayed on the attachment.
R
x Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
."Ella Carey
Tracy Holt
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920044
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVEFTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPCSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ELIS OLLSON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION GRANT FOR PROJECT SUCCESS.
:EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
1230~61101112100 SALARIES-TEACHER $2,770.00
1230 61101210000 FICA 230.00
TOTAL
$3,000.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
2200(18100186030 DONATIONS & GIFTS $3,000.00
TOTAL
$3,000.00
****~*******************************************************************
REQUl STING COST CENTER:
APPRCVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARI OF SUPERVISORS
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
~;f)(/:;~~~~
.J-/6-?~
3 -~--73
~
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCJlL YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920045
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVEFTISEMENT REQUIRED?
YES
NO X
FUND
PURPCSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FAMII Y LITERACY GRANT.
IXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
1211~61117112100 SALARIES-TEACHER $18,312.00
1211"61117210000 FICA 1,392.00
1211~61117550100 TRAVEL 1,685.00
1211 61117601300 INST/REC. SUPPLIES 2,500.00
SCHOOL
TOTAL
$23,889.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
2200(240002402737 ADULT ED.-FAMILY LITERACY $21,230.00
2200(18100181125 DONATIONS & GIFTS 2,659.00
TOTAL
$23,889.00
****~*******************************************************************
REQUI STING COST CENTER:
APPR(VALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOAR[ OF SUPERVISORS
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
/P?~ A? ~n~~
;; {Ill l~ (l~~1
1
DATE
~-/~-7.7
3, ~-93
w .
I \
R:~VENUE
2 2000-18100-186030
ElrpENDITURE
1 2301-61101-112100
1 2301-61101-210000
R8:VENUE
2~2000-24000-240237
2 2000-18100-181125
EKPENDITURE
1 2113-61117-112100
1 2113-61117-210000
1 2113-61117-550100
1 2113-61117-601300
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
1992-93 APPROPRIATION REQUEST
ELlS OLLSON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION GRANT
Donations & Gifts
Salaries-Teacher
FICA
FAMILY LITERACY GRANT
Adult Ed.-Family Literacy
Donations & Gifts
Salaries-Teacher
FICA
Travel
Inst/Rec. Supplies
$3,000.00
$2,770.00
5230.00
$3,000.00
$21,230.00
52,659.00
$23,889.00
$18,312.00
$1,392.00
$1,685.00
$2,500.00
$23,889.00
"
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
T
Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
F
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
February 17, 1993
D
Appropriations
Attached are the two appropriation forms as requested based on
D . Paskel's memo dated February 2, 1993.
Bibs
A tachments
c Tracy Holt
CC.'::.J: JT\! OF .cJ..~,; ,
,
<!"
;,
f
I FER I. g 10Ci~
lI. "
LL~jL\i~_ G; neii:
'.' /) _ ')/_ .0:2\
Distnbuted to Soant ~~,~-
i'N';"~' Il"M ~JCl. 02:..D.:QJ~1L
C:'.., ~ / /L,c, -1., Di J..;
,,'vq.' ,..' It
ALBEMARLE COUN1Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
February 16, 1993
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Robert W. Paske1, Division superintenden~;z:'
RE Request for Appropriation
At its meeting on February 8, 1993 the School Board approved the
fo lowing:
. Three Teacher Incentive Grants from the Virginia Commission for the
Arts for Stony point Elementary School.
c~0\
qJ U
1. Photography Project $300.00
2. Virginia History Project $300.00
3. Lime Kiln Arts (performing Arts)$100.00
The Teacher Incentive Grant Program has been established to help
strengthen the quality of arts education in the schools and to
encourage innovative projects which integrate the arts into the basic
curriculum of the classroom.
(;(/'1{/J. :A
v/ )/),
. The reappropriation of the remaining fund balance for Albemarle High
School Food Service. Albemarle High School Food Service had a fund
balance of $1,969.67 at the end of the FY 1991-92 fiscal year. The
funds will be used to purchase a new cash register and a coffee
machine.
It is requested that the Board of supervisors amend the appropriation
o dinance to receive and disburse these funds as displayed on the attachment.
R P / smm
x Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
Ella Carey
Tracy Holt
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920047
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
NIA COMMISSION FOR THE ARTS-TEACHER INCENTIVE GRANTS.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
1221 61101312500
PROF. SERVICES INSTRUCTIONAL
$700.00
TOTAL
$700.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2200 24000240426 TEACHER GRANT #93-0802 $300.00
2200 24000240427 TEACHER GRANT #93-0801 300.00
2200 24000240428 TEACHER GRANT #93-0985 100.00
TOTAL
$700.00
**** *******************************************************************
REQU STING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPR VALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRE TOR OF FINANCE
,<-/'il ""73
3 ~~-73
BOAR OF SUPERVISORS
. '
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FI SCJ L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920048
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVE1TISEMENT REQUIRED?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURP(])SE OF APPROPRIATION:
NEW ~QUIPMENT FOR ALBEMARLE HIGH SCHOOL FOOD SERVICE.
~XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****,*******************************************************************
1300 60301800100 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT-NEW $1,969.67
TOTAL
$1,969.67
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
2300 51000510100 FUND BALANCE $1,969.67
TOTAL
$1,969.67
****~*******************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
APPRCVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARr OF SUPERVISORS
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
~~ta~
,<'- /y-;J-3
3-4:-J3
,
, . . ~
. .
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 APPROPRIATION REQUEST
VIRGINIA COMMISSION FOR THE ARTS - TEACHER INCENTIVE GRANTS
Revenue
2-2000-24000-240426 Teacher Incentive Grant #93-0802 $300.00
2-2000-24000-240427 Teacher Incentive Grant #93-0801 $300.00
2-2000-24000-240428 Teacher Incentive Grant #93-0985 $100.00
Ebmenditure
1~2211-61101-312500 Prof. Services Instructional $700.00
ALBEMARLE HIGH SCHOOL FOOD SERVICE
II IEVENUE
2-3001-51000-510100 Appropriation Fund Balance $1,969.67
EXPENDITURE
1-3001-60301-800100 Machinery/Equipment-New $1,969.67
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
coutm' OF AlfJEMARU,
Attached are the appropriation forms requested in the attached
mo from Dr. Paskel dated February 16, 1993.
OM: Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
TE: February 18, 1993
Appropriations
Bibs
tachments
"
" ' "','''} / ';;~
~ (0 bCo,('. d-~ - )=)
'< ; "i'l :,\_~~~:-~g
COUNTY Of ALSEMAFU
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Parks and Recreation Department
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5844
MEMORANDUM
Hichard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
OM: Patrick K. Mullaney, Director of Parks and Recreation 1)~h1
February 19, 1993
Transfer of Capital Funds - ADA Compliance
In December the Board of Supervisors approved the ADA Transition Plan
veloped by the ADA Advisory Committee.
As you know that plan includes several Parks and Recreation capital
ojects, which need to be completed by January 26, 1995. The projects are
heduled to be funded by using some current funds that have already been
a propriated for accessibility projects, along with new appropriations scheduled
r 93-94 and 94-95 in the Capital Improvements Program.
At this time I would like to request that our existing accessibility
oJect funds all be transferred to a single code labeled ADA Compliance -, Parks
d Recreation. The resulting total in the new code should be $79,995.46 from
e following sources:
1 9000 11000 950004
1 9000 71000 950047
1 ~OOO 71000 950075
Mint Springs Valley Park
Beaver Creek Park
Rivanna-Five Senses Trail
$44,571.66
$25,000.00
$10,423.80
There are several reasons why it is preferable to have these funds in a
s ngle code. First, we have had to reorder our priorities based on our
u derstanding of the ADA legislation and the Rivanna and Beaver Creek projects
a e not part or our transition plan. Secondly, while we will be doing work at
n ne different locations, much of it will be the same type of work and probably
w 11 be bid together. Obviously nine different project codes would be more
d fficult to administer than one. Finally, it will be easier for us to show our
c mmitment to ADA and our good faith intention of complying with the legislation
l we are ever challenged with an ADA complaint.
I appreciate your assistance in this matter.
a ditional information, please let me know.
If I need to provide any
P Isms
c Melvin Breeden, Mildred Spicer
~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
February 22, 1993
Appropriation
Attached is an appropriation form to accomplish the transfers
quested in Pat Mullaney's memo dated February 19, 1993.
BIbs
tachment
Pat Mullaney
COUNTY OF AU3EMAF'J:,
FEB 23 lqcn
- .,
~;~
E>:^_C'UTi\./~'C Clfl~'ICE
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920050
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
CAPITAL
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
FER OF FUNDS FOR ADA COMPLIANCE.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
71000580411 ADA COMPLIANCE $79,995.46
71000950004 MINT SPRINS VALLEY PARK (44,571.66)
71000950047 BEAVER CREEK PARK (25,000.00)
71000950075 RIVANNA-FIVE SENSE TRAIL (10,423.80)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
**** *******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
PARKS & RECREATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF FINANCE
...,?-.2. %. -7.3
OF SUPERVISORS
~3-~-7i
.
~
~ ~. ,~, ...".
,vt.' . / - c:.,
, - .,,_z:___,~"'
County of Albemarle
AGENDA TI
Appropria
EXECUTIVE SUMMAR Y
- Sheriff's Bailiff
AGENDA DATE:
March 3, 1993
ITEM NUMBER: _
91 {I~~~, 91
SUBJECT
ACTION: ~
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
REVIEWED BY:
~T
ATTACHMENTS:
White
BACKG OUHD:
Attac ed for your approval is an appropriation to fund $27,570 for an additional bailiff
for t e Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. During FY 92-93 budget work sessions,
$14,0 0 (the county's projected share) was placed in a Board contingency account until
staff could determine, in conjunction with the City, if an additional bailiff was needed.
Sincethat time, discussions between the City, the county, Judge Shannon and both the City
and C nty Sheriff's departments have determined that a third bailiff is needed to provide
addit'onal security in the courtroom, as well as provide transportation for the juveniles
back 1nd forth to the Juvenile Detention Home.
I '
The t~tal appropriation of $27,570 will fund six months salary and fringe benefit costs,
plus perating costs and a vehicle. The County's share of the position will be $13,785,
which will be transferred from the Board's contingency line-item account to the Sheriff's
budge. The additional $13,785 will be shown as a revenue from the City into the general
fund. I
I
RECO ATION: Staff recommends your approval of the appropriation of $27,570 and the
trans er of $13,785 from the Board's contingency account to cover six months of the
Count's share of the additional bailiff.
jbt :
93.02~
I
Attac~ent
I
I
I
"\
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
,
FIScAL YEAR
92/93
NUMBER
920051
TYPEjOF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER X
NEW
i
ADVEfTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND!
GENERAL
,
I
PURP~SE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR BAILIFF IN SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT.
I
!XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
1100 31020110000 SALARIES $9,426.00
1100 31020210000 FICA 740.00
1100 31020221000 VRS 870.00
1100 31020231000 HEALTH INS 634.00
1100 31020241000 LIFE INS 80.00
1100 31020232000 DENTAL INS 30.00
1100 31020312500 PROFESSIONAL INSTRUCTION 70.00
1100 31020370000 LAUNDRY 50.00
1100 31020530900 VEHICLE INSURANCE 230.00
1100 31020580100 DUES/MEMBERSHIPS 20.00
1100 31020600900 VEHICLE EQUIP 370.00
1100 31020601000 POLICE SUPPLIES 250.00
1100 31020601100 UNIFORMS/APPAREL 600.00
1100 31020800300 COMMUNICATION EQUIP 1,200.00
1100 31020800500 VEHICLE 13,000.00
I
1100~li010999905
I
I
I
BD. OF SUPV.-CONTINGENCY
(13,785.00)
TOTAL
$13,785.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2100 19000190202 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE $13,785.00
I
I
I
I
I
****+*******************************************************************
I
I
REQU,STING COST CENTER:
APPR~VALS:
DIREtTOR OF FINANCE
I
BOAR~ OF SUPERVISORS
I
TOTAL
$13,785.00
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
SIGNATURE
DATE
~~A2~~_
~'fh Jt (~tL?J
()
;?-.?fC"- .?J
..., ~ ..2
;;;) ~ 9-- ~ e,:)