HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201500004 Review Comments WPO VSMP 2015-06-08�pF A
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
VSMP Permit plan review — Conditional Approval
Project:
Charlottesville Catholic School, VSMP
Plan preparer:
Graham Murray, Collins Engineering [200 Garrett St., Suite K, Charlottesville,
VA 22902, agr harn@collins -en ing eering com, scott(a),collins -en ing eering corn]
Owner or rep.:
Catholic Diocese of Richmond, Walter F. Sullivan, Bishop, etal
[7800 Carousel Lane, Richmond, VA 23294-42011
Plan received date:
26 Feb 2015
(Rev. 1)
14 May 2015
(Rev. 2)
5 Jun 2015
Date of comments:
24 Mar 2015
(Rev. 1)
1 Jun 2015
(Rev. 2)
8 Jun 2015 (e- review)
Reviewer:
John Anderson
Conditional Approval. For Final Approval, please submit: a construction record drawing (As- built) for the
downslope detention area; an easement plat, and; a narrative or calculation to explain how /whether existing
pond is engineered for structural integrity for the 100 -yr storm event (9VAC25- 870 -85). [11.7. -9., below]
Please submit 4- copies of plans; print/signed SWPPP with items listed above, for Final Approval.
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
The SWPPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17 -405. A SWPPP must contain (1)
a PPP, (2) an ESCP, (3) a SWMP, and (4) any TMDL measures necessary.
1. Number pages. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
2. Narrative — Include brief description of project, proposed improvements. (Rev. 1) Partially
addressed. As follow -up, edit PURPOSE to reflect 3.61 Ac. Area of Disturbance. (Rev. 2)
Addressed.
3. Section 6 /PPP — Identify person/s responsible for pollution prevention practices. Name individual.
(VAR10 Part ILA.4.d —may be same as qualified personnel) (Rev. 1/2) Comment not addressed.
Restated: Responsible person may be Collins Engineering personnel. May not be blank.
4. SWPPP exhibit — Incorporate revisions in response to ESCP comments, C., below. (Rev. 1) As
follow -up, incorporate minor ESCP follow -up comment, below: text edit. (Rev. 2) Addressed.
5. Replace Certification with Certification matching VAR 10 (ACCD template will be revised /regret
inconvenience): (Rev. 1) Addressed /please ensure hard -copy SWPPP submittal is signed.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 4
4. Certification. Any person signing a document under Part III K 1 or 2 shall make the following
certification-
"I certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand this document and that this document
and all attachments were prepared in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations"
6. SWPPP Exhibit shows dumpster /concrete wash -out areas >30 -ft. from existing gravel travelway,
which would require stable /gravel surface between travelway and each location. Provide stable
travel surface between travelway and proposed locations to support concrete and waste
management trucks. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
7. Do not resubmit SWPPP until SWMP and ESCP revisions are reviewed and approved, to save
time and resources (glad to review .PDFs). Thank you
B. VSMP: SWPPP: Stormwater Management Plan (WPO201500004)
VSMP Regulation 9VAC25- 870 -108 requires the VSMP authority to approve or disapprove a SWMP. This plan
is disapproved for reasons provided in comments below. The stormwater management plan content requirements
can be found in County Code section 17 -403.
1. As discussed 23 -Mar, please consider alternative SWM/best management practice. Contributing drainage
area less than 2 Ac. is not large enough "to sustain a permanent water level within the stormwater wetland."
(BMP Clearinghouse, Design Specification No. 13, Sec. 5, Physical Feasibility and Design Applications):
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
2. Title sheet — Revise note. Delete reference to constructed wetlands. Reference Alt. BMP. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
3. Whatever BMP is selected, furnish vehicular access to SWM facility/private drainage easements.
[ACDSM, 5.] (Rev. 1) Addressed.
4. If a basin -type BMP is selected, furnish floor dimensions (plan view). (Rev. 1) As follow -up, sheet 3: Filter
cell contours table is confusing. Recommend revise Elev. to begin w/413.5' since cell must be excavated to
this depth. Table begin Elev. 416', a mid -media Elev., is confusing. (Rev. 2) Addressed.
5. If 12" DIA Nyoplast riser is used, consider concrete frame detail, whether it works with an elevated riser.
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
6. Furnish construction, maintenance, and inspection Notes for selected BMP. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
7 -9, New (6/1/2015 2:38 PM /email), Additional to comments sent 6/1/2015 2:04 AM - for Final Approval
Provide Construction Record Drawing (As- built) for VSMP (Sec. 17- 401.J) 17 -422) for CCS— downslope
detention area (existing pond below downstream of Level 1 bioretention). Ref. Attachment to 6/1/15 email:
1,3,5,7,8.
1 —Four (4) photos received 12 -May. Additional photos welcome.
3 — Provide Geo- coordinates of existing pond.
5 — Critical: Ponds should include a survey of the pond bottom. Surveys should verify pond
volumes are per design (verify compliance routings). Corrections may be required for alterations
from the design (routings).
7 — Provide weir details.
8 —We have computations /simply verify As -built condition is equivalent to or better than design.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 4
8. Easement plat required for Final VSMP Approval. (Access, bioretention, pond, outfall to property line)
9. Provide Narrative or calculations to explain how /whether existing pond is engineered for structural
integrity for the 100 -year storm event. - 9VAC25- 870 -85.
C. VSMP: SWPPP: Erosion Control Plan (WP0201500004)
Virginia Code §62.1- 44.15:55 requires the VESCP authority to approve or disapprove an ESCP. This plan is disapproved
for reasons provided in comments below. The erosion control plan content requirements can be found in County Code
section 17 -402.
1. Revise Limits of Disturbance. An I V wide peninsular area for constructing walks /trail appears
unrealistic. There is no penalty for increasing LOD. VSMP permit review fee is identical for
LOD, 1 - 5 Ac. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
2. Revise Limits of Disturbance to include outfall, pipe 7. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
3. Revise Limits, if necessary, to show stockpiles, staging areas. Show stockpiles /yard, etc. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
4. Ensure that ESCP and General VPDES Permit Registration form areas to be disturbed are the same
(At present: 3.01 v. 3.11 Ac.) (Rev. 1) Not addressed /ensure Registration value =3.61 Ac. (Rev.
2) Addressed.
5. Proposed routing of construction traffic through existing school parking lot is a concern. Consider
a location N of existing parking (separate from it, 300' Lf), or enforceable limits on hours if allow
construction traffic to use existing school parking areas. Imagine reaction of parents of children
enrolled in private school to accident or severe injury. Risk can be minimized with CE separate
from existing student drop- off /parking areas, or through limits on hours of traffic. It is reasonable
to expect that use of existing parking by construction traffic may cause damage expense equivalent
to that of constructing a soil/stone- stabilized temp entrance N of the existing lot. Ref CCS at:
https: / /www.cvillecatholic.org /about - cvillecatholic/ Revise location of temporary construction
entrance. Comment records request. VDOT denies request for temporary construction entrance
on Rio Rd East. (Rev. 1) Addressed. As follow -up: Revise text, third sentence sheet 6 CE Note to
read: "Only light -duty construction traffic will be allowed during student pick -up /drop off hours."
(Rev. 2) Addressed.
6. Identify 10' x 10' concrete structure (pad) at west end of existing parking lot, N side of site. (Rev.
1) Addressed.
Engineering plan review staff is available 2 -4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to discuss this review.
Plan reviewer is available at 434.296 -5832 -0069 should you have any questions.
Process:
After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate request
form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will prepare estimates and
check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's Management Analyst will
prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner and submitted along with cash,
certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need to be approved and signed by the County
Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2 -4 weeks to obtain all the correct signatures and forms.
Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded. The
County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and signature
information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 4
After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ database
for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local VSMP authority
approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid directly to the state. For fastest
processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the application. DEQ should notify applicants
with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the application, they will issue a permit coverage letter.
This should be copied to the county.
After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre - construction conference. Applicants
will need to request a pre - construction conference by completing a form, and pay the remainder of the application
fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee remaining to be paid. This will be
checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre - construction conference will be scheduled with the County
inspector. At the pre - construction conference, should everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading
permit will be issued by the County so that work may begin.
County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering;
htW://www.albemarle.orp-/deptforms.asp?departinent--cdengno
WP0201500004 CCS_060815rev2_VSMP_ConditionaI Approv
�pF A
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
VSMP Permit plan review
Project:
Charlottesville Catholic School, VSMP
Plan preparer:
Graham Murray, Collins Engineering [200 Garrett St., Suite K, Charlottesville,
VA 22902, agr harn@collins -en ing eering com, scott(a),collins -en ing eering corn]
Owner or rep.:
Catholic Diocese of Richmond, Walter F. Sullivan, Bishop, etal
[7800 Carousel Lane, Richmond, VA 23294-42011
Plan received date:
26 Feb 2015
(Rev. 1)
14 May 2015
Date of comments:
24 Mar 2015
(Rev. 1)
1 June 2015 1revised
Reviewer:
John Anderson
New comments (B.7 -9); SWPPP items; several follow -ups. PDF review: plan/SWPPP revisions welcome.
Then, with .PDF review /acceptance: Final 4 -copy plan; print/signed SWPPP submittal for Approval.
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
The SWPPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17 -405. A SWPPP must contain (1)
a PPP, (2) an ESCP, (3) a SWMP, and (4) any TMDL measures necessary.
1. Number pages. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
2. Narrative — Include brief description of project, proposed improvements. (Rev. 1) Partially
addressed. As follow -up, edit PURPOSE to reflect 3.61 Ac. Area of Disturbance.
3. Section 6 /PPP — Identify person/s responsible for pollution prevention practices. Name individual.
(VAR10 Part II.A.4.d —may be same as qualified personnel) (Rev. 1) Comment not addressed.
4. SWPPP exhibit — Incorporate revisions in response to ESCP comments, C., below. (Rev. 1) As
follow -up, incorporate minor ESCP follow -up comment, below: text edit.
5. Replace Certification with Certification matching VAR 10 (ACCD template will be revised /regret
inconvenience): (Rev. 1) Addressed /please ensure hard -copy SWPPP submittal is signed.
4. Certification. Any person signing a document under Pan III K 1 or 2 shall make the following
certification_
'I certify under penalty of law that I have read .and understand this document and that this document
and all attachments were prepared in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel preperly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations_"
6. SWPPP Exhibit shows dumpster /concrete wash -out areas >30 -ft. from existing gravel travelway,
which would require stable /gravel surface between travelway and each location. Provide stable
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 4
travel surface between travelway and proposed locations to support concrete and waste
management trucks. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
7. Do not resubmit SWPPP until SWMP and ESCP revisions are reviewed and approved, to save
time and resources (glad to review .PDFs). Thank you
B. VSMP: SWPPP: Stormwater Management Plan (WPO201500004)
VSMP Regulation 9VAC25- 870 -108 requires the VSMP authority to approve or disapprove a SWMP. This plan
is disapproved for reasons provided in comments below. The stormwater management plan content requirements
can be found in County Code section 17 -403.
1. As discussed 23 -Mar, please consider alternative SWM/best management practice. Contributing drainage
area less than 2 Ac. is not large enough "to sustain a permanent water level within the stormwater wetland."
(BMP Clearinghouse, Design Specification No. 13, Sec. 5, Physical Feasibility and Design Applications):
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
2. Title sheet — Revise note. Delete reference to constructed wetlands. Reference Alt. BMP. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
3. Whatever BMP is selected, furnish vehicular access to SWM facility/private drainage easements.
[ACDSM, 5., (Rev. 1) Addressed.
4. If a basin -type BMP is selected, furnish floor dimensions (plan view). (Rev. 1) As follow -up, sheet 3: Filter
cell contours table is confusing. Recommend revise Elev. to begin w/413.5' since cell must be excavated to
this depth. Table begin Elev. 416', a mid -media Elev., is confusing.
5. If 12" DIA Nyoplast riser is used, consider concrete frame detail, whether it works with an elevated riser.
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
6. Furnish construction, maintenance, and inspection Notes for selected BMP. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
7 -9, New, Additional to prior comments (6/1/2015 2:04 AM).
7. Provide Construction Record Drawing (As- built) for VSMP (Sec. 17- 401.J./17 -422) for CCS— downslope
detention area (existing pond below downstream of Level 1 bioretention). Ref. Attached list of
information: 1,3,5,7,8.
1 —Four (4) photos received 12 -May. Additional photos welcome.
3 — Provide Geo- coordinates of existing pond.
5 — Critical: Ponds should include a survey of the pond bottom. Surveys should verify pond
volumes are per design (verify compliance routings). Corrections may be required for alterations
from the design (routings).
7 — Provide weir details.
8 —We have computations /simply verify As -built condition is equivalent to or better than design.
8. Easement plat required for WPO Approval. (Access, bioretention, pond, outfall to property line)
9. Provide Narrative or calculations to explain how /whether existing pond is engineered for structural
integrity for the 100 -year storm event. - 9VAC25- 870 -85.
C. VSMP: SWPPP: Erosion Control Plan (WPO201500004)
Virginia Code §62.1- 44.15:55 requires the VESCP authority to approve or disapprove an ESCP. This plan is disapproved
for reasons provided in comments below. The erosion control plan content requirements can be found in County Code
section 17 -402.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 4
1. Revise Limits of Disturbance. An 11' wide peninsular area for constructing walks /trail appears
unrealistic. There is no penalty for increasing LOD. VSMP permit review fee is identical for
LOD, 1 - 5 Ac. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
2. Revise Limits of Disturbance to include outfall, pipe 7. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
3. Revise Limits, if necessary, to show stockpiles, staging areas. Show stockpiles /yard, etc. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
4. Ensure that ESCP and General VPDES Permit Registration form areas to be disturbed are the same
(At present: 3.01 v. 3.11 Ac.) (Rev. 1) Not addressed /ensure Registration value =3.61 Ac.
5. Proposed routing of construction traffic through existing school parking lot is a concern. Consider
a location N of existing parking (separate from it, 300' L ±), or enforceable limits on hours if allow
construction traffic to use existing school parking areas. Imagine reaction of parents of children
enrolled in private school to accident or severe injury. Risk can be minimized with CE separate
from existing student drop- off /parking areas, or through limits on hours of traffic. It is reasonable
to expect that use of existing parking by construction traffic may cause damage expense equivalent
to that of constructing a soil/stone- stabilized temp entrance N of the existing lot. Ref CCS at:
https: / /www.cvillecatholic.org /about - cvillecatholic/ Revise location of temporary construction
entrance. Comment records request. VDOT denies request for temporary construction entrance
on Rio Rd East. (Rev. 1) Addressed. As follow -up: Revise text, third sentence sheet 6 CE Note to
read: "Only light -duty construction traffic will be allowed during student pick -up /drop off hours."
6. Identify 10' X 10' concrete structure (pad) at west end of existing parking lot, N side of site. (Rev.
1) Addressed.
The VSMP permit application and all plans may be resubmitted for approval when all comments have been
satisfactorily addressed (.PDF preview, welcome). For re- submittals /final, please provide 4 copies of complete
permit package (1 print copy SWPPP) with a completed application form.
Engineering plan review staff is available 2 -4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to discuss this review.
Plan reviewer is available at 434.296 -5832 -0069 should you have any questions.
Process:
After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate request
form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will prepare estimates and
check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's Management Analyst will
prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner and submitted along with cash,
certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need to be approved and signed by the County
Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2 -4 weeks to obtain all the correct signatures and forms.
Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded. The
County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and signature
information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees.
After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ database
for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local VSMP authority
approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid directly to the state. For fastest
processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the application. DEQ should notify applicants
with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the application, they will issue a permit coverage letter.
This should be copied to the county.
After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre - construction conference. Applicants
will need to request a pre - construction conference by completing a form, and pay the remainder of the application
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 4
fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee remaining to be paid. This will be
checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre - construction conference will be scheduled with the County
inspector. At the pre - construction conference, should everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading
permit will be issued by the County so that work may begin.
County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering;
hllp://www.albemarle.orgJdeptforms.asp?dei2artinent--cdengmMo
File: WP0201500004 CCS 060115rev1 b VSMP
�pF A
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
VSMP Permit plan review
Project: Charlottesville Catholic School, VSMP
Plan preparer: Graham Murray, Collins Engineering [200 Garrett St., Suite K, Charlottesville,
VA 22902, agr harn@collins -en ing eering com, scott(a),collins -en ing eering com]
Owner or rep.: Catholic Diocese of Richmond, Walter F. Sullivan, Bishop, etal
[7800 Carousel Lane, Richmond, VA 23294-42011
Plan received date: 26 Feb 2015
Date of comments: 24 Mar 2015
Reviewer: John Anderson
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
The SWPPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17 -405. A SWPPP must contain (1)
a PPP, (2) an ESCP, (3) a SWMP, and (4) any TMDL measures necessary.
1. Number pages.
2. Narrative — Include brief description of project, proposed improvements.
3. Section 6/PPP — Identify person/s responsible for pollution prevention practices. Name individual.
(VAR10 Part II.A.4.d —may be same as qualified personnel)
4. SWPPP exhibit — Incorporate revisions in response to ESCP comments, C., below.
5. Replace Certification with Certification matching VAR10 (ACCD template will be revised/regret
inconvenience):
4_ Certification_ Any person signing a document under Part III K 1 or 2 shall make the following
certification:
'I certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand this document and that this document
and all attachments were prepared in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations_"
6. SWPPP Exhibit shows dumpster /concrete wash -out areas >30 -ft. from existing gravel travelway,
which would require stable /gravel surface between travelway and each location. Provide stable
travel surface between travelway and proposed locations to support concrete and waste
management trucks.
7. Do not resubmit SWPPP until SWMP and ESCP revisions are reviewed and approved, to save
time and resources (glad to review .PDFs).
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
B. VSMP: SWPPP: Stormwater Management Plan (WPO201500004)
VSMP Regulation 9VAC25- 870 -108 requires the VSMP authority to approve or disapprove a SWMP. This plan
is disapproved for reasons provided in comments below. The stormwater management plan content requirements
can be found in County Code section 17 -403.
1. As discussed 23 -Mar, please consider alternative SWM /best management practice. Contributing drainage
area less than 2 Ac. is not large enough "to sustain a permanent water level within the stormwater wetland."
(BMP Clearinghouse, Design Specification No. 13, Sec. 5, Physical Feasibility and Design Applications):
Contributing Drainage Area (CDA). The contributing drainage area must be large enough to
sustain a permanent water level within the stormwater wetland. if the only source of wetland
hydrology is slormwater runoff, then several dozen acres of drainage area are typically needed to
maintain constant water elevations. Smaller drainage areas are acceptable if the bottom of the
wetland intercepts the groundwater table or if the designer or approving agency is willing to
accept periodic wetland drawdown_
2. Title sheet — Revise note. Delete reference to constructed wetlands. Reference Alt. BMP.
3. Whatever BMP is selected, furnish vehicular access to SWM facility /private drainage easements.
[ACDSM, 5.1
Best Management Practices for Stormwater Management: All practices must have
adequate vehicle access; 10' width tuaded at less than 20%. Anything over 20% must be
surfaced with gravel or pavement. Access must be to all struc lures and forebay cleanout
areas. Easements must be provided over all access and facilities, to accompany deeds and
agreements as available on the county website;
http://www.albemarle.org/deptforms.a-,p.LdeaAment=cdeggwpo
4. If a basin -type BMP is selected, furnish floor dimensions (plan view).
5. If 12" DIA Nyoplast riser is used, consider concrete frame detail, whether it works with an elevated riser.
6. Furnish construction, maintenance, and inspection Notes for selected BMP.
C. VSMP: SWPPP: Erosion Control Plan (WPO201500004)
Virginia Code §62.1- 44.15:55 requires the VESCP authority to approve or disapprove an ESCP. This plan is disapproved
for reasons provided in comments below. The erosion control plan content requirements can be found in County Code
section 17 -402.
1. Revise Limits of Disturbance. An I V wide peninsular area for constructing walks /trail appears
unrealistic. There is no penalty for increasing LOD. VSMP permit review fee is identical for
LOD, 1 - 5 Ac.
2. Revise Limits of Disturbance to include outfall, pipe 7.
3. Revise Limits, if necessary, to show stockpiles, staging areas. Show stockpiles /yard, etc.
4. Ensure that ESCP and General VPDES Permit Registration form areas to be disturbed are the same
(At present: 3.01 v. 3.11 Ac.)
5. Proposed routing of construction traffic through existing school parking lot is a concern. Consider
a location N of existing parking (separate from it, 300' L ±), or enforceable limits on hours if allow
construction traffic to use existing school parking areas. Imagine reaction of parents of children
enrolled in private school to accident or severe injury. Risk can be minimized with CE separate
from existing student drop- off /parking areas, or through limits on hours of traffic. It is reasonable
to expect that use of existing parking by construction traffic may cause damage expense equivalent
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
to that of constructing a soil/stone- stabilized temp entrance N of the existing lot. Ref CCS at:
https : / /www.cvillecatholic.orWabout- cvillecatholic/ Revise location of temporary construction
entrance. Comment records request. VDOT denies request for temporary construction entrance
on Rio Rd East.
6. Identify 10' X 10' concrete structure (pad) at west end of existing parking lot, N side of site.
The VSMP permit application and all plans may be resubmitted for approval when all comments have been
satisfactorily addressed. For re- submittals please provide 2 copies of the complete permit package with a completed
application form.
Engineering plan review staff is available 2 -4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to discuss this review.
Plan reviewer is available at 434.296 -5832 -0069 should you have any questions.
Process:
After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate request
form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will prepare estimates and
check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's Management Analyst will
prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner and submitted along with cash,
certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need to be approved and signed by the County
Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2 -4 weeks to obtain all the correct signatures and forms.
Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded. The
County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and signature
information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees.
After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ database
for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local VSMP authority
approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid directly to the state. For fastest
processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the application. DEQ should notify applicants
with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the application, they will issue a permit coverage letter.
This should be copied to the county.
After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre - construction conference. Applicants
will need to request a pre - construction conference by completing a form, and pay the remainder of the application
fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee remaining to be paid. This will be
checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre - construction conference will be scheduled with the County
inspector. At the pre - construction conference, should everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading
permit will be issued by the County so that work may begin.
County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering;
htt2://www.albemarle.ora/deptforms.asp?departrnent--cdengmMo
File: WP0201500004 CCS 032415 VSMP