HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-05-06
FIN A L
9:00 A.M.
May 6, 1992
YOUTH-IN-GOVERNMENT DAY
Room 7, County Office Building
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Moment of Silence.
Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
~Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
Approval of Minutes: June 12, September 18 and November 6, 1991.
Highway Matters:
a) Discussion: Route 682.
b) Other Highway Matters.
Appeal: Sara Watson Preliminary Plat (Defer to September 2, 1992).
Architectural Review Board's decision re: Hardee's signs (Applicant
requests indefinite deferral).
Discussion: Tipping Fees.
Statement for the Governor's Advisory Commission on the Dillon Rule and
Local Government (Deferred from March 11, 1992).
Request to amend the Albemarle County Service Authority "water only"
service area boundaries to include Stone-Robinson Elementary School.
Appropriations:
a) Education - for Microcomputer Initiative.
b) Education - Instructional Technology In-Service Grant.
c) Education - Title II Grant.
d) Education - Title II Demonstration and Exemplary Grant.
e) Education - Project Success.
f) Capital Improvements Program Appropriation Ordinance.
g) Reappropriation: Stormwater Projects.
Work Session: Road Name and Street Address Ordinance.
Housing' Committee Report.
Whitewood-Road-Park-€ommittee-Rermrt. (Defer to June 3, 1992)
Work Session: Open Space and Critical Resource Plan (continued from
April 1, 1992).
11:25 A.M. - Public Hearine:: Jail Ordinance amendment.
11:30 A.M.: Leave County Office Building for tour of the Charlottesville I
Albemarle Airport, and lunch.
1:30 P.M. , Room 11: Executive Session on Personnel and Property
Acquisition.
4:00 P.M. , Rooms 5/6: Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission.
Appointments.
Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
Adjourn to May 13, 1992, at 4:00 P.M.
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16,-
17)
18)
19)
20)
21)
22)
23)
24)
CON S E N T
A G K N D A
FOR APPROVAL:
5.4
ted April 13, 1992, from Gerald G. Utz, Contract Administrator, Virginia Department of Trans-
, requesting approval of a resolution to add and abandon certain sections of Route 660 due to recent
ction of that road and the bridge over the South Fork Rivanna River.
5.1
5.2
n requesting acceptance of Marshall Court into the State Secondary System of Highways.
5.3
ilities and Required Buffers/Landscaping; recommended procedures to avoid destruction of required
ea/landscaping.
5.5
s of Expenses to the State Compensation Board from the Director of Finance, Sheriff, Commonwealth's
and Regional Jail for the Month of April, 1992.
ponse/EMS Agency Resolution: Authorize County fire departments to serve as First Response/Emergency
ervices Agencies.
5.6
from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, suggesting that a work session on the Sign Ordinance
extra meeting on May 13 at 4:00 P.M.
FOR
5.7 April 17, 1992, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, entitled "Route 29 North
5.8 ted April 20, 1992, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Transportation, stating
rift Drive was accepted into the State System effective April 1, 1992.
5.9 ted April 22, 1992, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Transportation, re:
er the Moorman's River on Route 671 at Millington.
5.10 ted April 23, 1992, from Thomas F. Farley, District Engineer, Virginia Department of Transportation,
t the Board's comments regarding the interstate/primary/urban systems have been made a part of the
cord for the Preallocation Hearing held on March 31.
5.11 ted April 27, 1992, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Transportation, stating
that Wi low Lake Drive in Willow Lake Subdivision was accepted into the State Secondary System effective
April 13, 1992.
5.12 29, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, enclosing list of "Projects Under
May 1, 1992."
5.13 e Planning Commission's Minutes for April 14, 1992.
5.14 ted April 17, 1992, from Amelia Patterson, Zoning Administrator, addressed to Roger Ray entitled
1 Determination of Number of Parcels - Section 10.3.1, Tax Map 105, Parcel 11; property of Bear Island
ds."
5.15 ted April 24, 1992, from Amelia Patterson, Zoning Administrator, addressed to Leonard and Sylvia
entitled "Official Determination of Number of Parcels - Section 10.3.1, Tax Map 66, Parcel 28;
of the Milgraums."
5.16 ted April 23, 1992, from James Christian Hill, National Register Assistant, Virginia Department of
Resources, stating that Castlebrook, Albemarle County, 02-656, does not meet the requirements for
n the Virginia Landmarks Register.
5.17 ted April 24, 1992, from Hugh C. Miller, Director, Department of Historic Resources, addressed to J.
perties, Inc., stating that Krmiscorthy, Albellarle County (DBR File No. 02-28) had been placed on the
Landmarks Register and is to be endorsed to the National Register of Historic Places.
5.18 1991
1 Reports of the Allegheny Power System and the Potomac Edison Company (on file).
5.19
dated April 28, 1992, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, entitled "Status Report of the
anna River Restoration Project."
5.20
dated April 28, 1992, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, entitled "1990 Recycling Rates,
oEd Waste Authority."
and Sewer Authority Minutes for March 23, 1992.
Sheriff's Request for an additional baliff.
5.21
5.23 ted April 29, 1992, from H. Bryan Mitchell, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer, Department of
Historic Resources, stating that an archaeological site located in Albemarle County (44AB348) is not eligible
'ng on the National Register of Historic Places due to its compromised integrity and low research
Report for Arbor Crest Apartments (HydraUlic Road Apts.) for the Month of March, 1992.
Edward H. Sa ,Jr.
Samuel Mill
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
T
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
F
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community
Development ~ )
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
May 7, 1992
D
S
Board Actions of May 6, 1992
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on May 6, 1992, the
f llowing actions were taken:
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda
the PUBLIC.
Ginny Decker, representing the League of Women Voters,
p esented a statement supporting the Housing Committee Report and
ur ed the Board to consider the recommendations.
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Letter dated April 13, 1992, from
aId G. Utz, Contract Administrator, Virginia Department of
nsportation, requesting approval of a resolution to add and
ndon certain sections of Route 660 due to recent reconstruc-
n of that road and the bridge over the South Fork Rivanna
er.
Adopted resolution. Orginal forwarded to Highway Depart-
t.
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Resolution requesting acceptance of
shall Court into the State Secondary System of Highways.
Adopted resolution. Original forwarded to Engineering.
I
(
"',
te:
ge 4
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
May 7, 1992
Agenda Item No. 12. Request to amend the Albemarle County
rvice Authority "water only" service area boundaries to include
one-Robinson Elementary School.
e)
f)
opted.
g)
Set public hearing for June 3, 1992, at 10:00 a.m.
Agenda Item No. 13. Appropriation Requests.
a)
b)
Education - Microcomputer Initiative - Approved.
Education - Instructional Technology In-Service Grant -
Approved.
Education - Title II Grant - Approved.
Education - Title II Demonstration and Exemplary Grant -
Approved.
Education - Project Success - Approved.
Capital Improvements Program Appropriation Ordinance -
c)
d)
Reappropriation: Stormwater Projects - Approved.
Ori.ginal appropriation forms have been forwarded to Melvin
eeden under separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 14. Work Session: Road Name and Street
dress Ordinance.
Set public hearing for June 17, 1992.
Agenda Item No. 15. Housing Committee Report.
Set: joint public hearing with the Planning Commission for
3, 1992, at 7 P.M., Room 7.
The Planning Commission is to reconsider ZTA-91-05 in light
f the Housing Committee's Report, and hopefully,have a
r commendation for the Board on June 3.
Agenda Item No. 16. Whitewood Road Park Committee Report.
DEFERRED to June 3, 1992.
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
At a regular meeting of the Board
A bemarle County held this 6th day of
i was duly moved and seconded that:
of
May
Supervisors of
, 1 9 2..L.. ,
WHEREAS, Secondary Route 660 from 0.21 miles north of Route
1 30 to 0.29 miles north of Route 1530, a distance of 0.08 miles
a d Route 660 from 0.29 miles north of Route 1530 to 0.42 miles
n rth of Route 1530 a distance of 0.13 miles, a total of 0.21
m'les, has been altered, and a new road has been constructed and
a proved by the State Highway Commissioner, which new road
s rves the same citizens as the road so altered.
WHEREAS, certain sections of this new road follow new
1 these being shown on the attached sketch titled
the Secondary System due to the Relocation and
C nstruction of Route 660, Project 0660-002-187,C501,C502,
A bemarle County", dated at Charlottesville, Virginia, February
1 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the portions of
s condary Route 660, i.e., section 3 and 4, shown in red on the
a orementioned sketch, a total of 0.21 miles be and hereby is,
a ded to the Secondary System of State Highways pursuant to
s ction 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended;
And further, that the sections of old location, i.e.,
S ction 1 and 2 on the aforementioned sketch, a total distance
o 0.23 miles, be, and the same hereby is abandoned as a public
r ad pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia of
1 50 as amended.
* * * * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher
f regoing writing is
a opted by the Board
r gular meeting held on
do hereby certify that the
a true, correct copy of a resolution
of Supervisors of Albemarle County at a
May 6, 1992 .
~.~
Clerk, County Board of Supervisors
~
~
"
II)
-
~
I
.,..L5'
+n, +Z'Z Y.LS
o
L/)
I
<.J
,..,,-
II)
-
I
8
i
4J
'Y
~
~.
A.'"
~
4J~
",,0
//;'
//;'1
//;'1
//;'1
m
+.J
00
o
.-j
+
o
N
\I
4.1
";)
o
E
"
.L
\J
-0
J.
..0
'"'II
-
o
~ .
'E
m
+.J
00
".
N
...
f +.J
Lt'l c.J
ci <II
00
.'
. ..
tl
41
o
Z
//
~' ,.'
,'~o1,~ /
//:;~~f.~ ~ /:E ~
~\~ /. ~ ~
. <II
Coo
l Y.LS
,/
o
o
+
\0
.....
m
+.J
Cf.l
/
.~
~ \'
~ ~
~~
~
'"
+.J
c.J <II
<II I-<
.... .....,~
.... 0 +.J
~+.JI-<Q
OQp,.<II
"0 <II
~ a <II I-<
m<ll+.JO
<Il :> <Il ~
l-< m r-t
,0 p,. p,. a ..;
a I-< c.J
r-t"OO 0 <II
r-tQc.J~
co co ~
<Il L/') l-<
<II CIl..c: I p,.
:><Il+.JCf.l
..... M ~ ~
MCOl-<E-<O
<Il 0
<Ilr-t~+.J..c:
CIl'~ ..... +.J
m E <II a M
<II p,.,o Q
r-t~>';::l<ll
P-.O+.JCIlr-t
N
0
L/') E
U <Il
+.J
..... 00.
0 >.
L/') en
U
>.
~ I-<
Qr-- m
Zoo "0
<:..... Q
I 0
ZN "0 c.J
00 <II <Il
HO "0 ;::l Cf.l
E-< I <Il Q
<:0 j:l ..... 0
U\O +.J +.J
0 Q
0\0 "0
...:ro Q 0 "0
rz:l c.J <Il
~ .. m 00 "0
E-< ,0 .~ "0
ou m "0 m
E-<rz:l <II <II
..., ,0 <II
rz:lO ,0 ,0
~~ 0 0
ClP-. +.J 0
+.J +.J
>t
E-<
Z
~
o
u'
rz:l
...:r
~
<:
~
rz:l
~
...:r
<:
~ ~
rz:l0
E-<\O
Cf.l \0
>t
OOrz:l
E-<
>t::J
~o
<:~
Q
zz
00
U
rz:lZ
000
H
ZE-i
HU
::J
rz:l~
C.!lE-i
Zoo
<:z
::I: 0
uu
j:l Q Q
0 0 0
..... ..... .~
+.J
+.J +.J
m co co
c.J c.J
0 c.J
r-t 0 0
r-t r-t
"0 "0 ~
r-t r-t
<II
0 0 Q
~ ~
0 li-l
0 0
Q Q Q
0 0 0
..... ..... ~
+.J
+.J +.J
c.J c.J c.J
<Il <II <Il
00 00
00
101
oQ
~
~o:.
o
"....
.M
00 Q
C.....N
m l-< 0\
l-<<IIO\
E-i<ll.....
Q
~..... ~
o MO\
Q.....
.rz:l
+.J >.
p,. c.J l-<
<Il ..... co
Q ~ ;::l
~ I-<
. m .0
m l-< <II
>E-i~
L....~".
.~ ,..~~
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
B~IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
C,unty, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section
3 .1-229, the Virginia D~partment of Transportation be and
i I hereby requested to accept into the Secondary System of
H'!ghways, subject to final inspection and approval by the
R'sident Highway Department, the following road in Marshall
Minor Subdivision:
Marshall Court:
Beginning at Station -00+50, a point common to the
centerline of Marshall Court and the edge of pave-
ment of State Route 20, thence in a southeasterly
direction 340.00 feet to Station 2+90, offset
25.00 feet in a southwesterly direction, thence in
a southeasterly direction 50.00 feet, the end of
the cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of
T ansportation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unob-
s'ructed right-of-way and drainage easements along this
r:quested addition as recorded by plats in the Office of the
C.rcuit Court Clerk of Albemarle County in Deed Book 573,
I
P ge 249; and Deed Book 1216, page 687.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the fore-
g ing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution
u'animously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
c'unty, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 6, 1992.
~a
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
D RAP' T
;~,
, "
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has requested that I encourage all
public utilities operating in the County to be mindful of requirements imposed
upon private development, particularly in regard to avoiding destruction of
required buffer areas/landscaping. The County often requires undisturbed buffers
and/or additional landscaping between dissimilar uses such as residential
deve~opment and a commercial site.
Obviously, when a utility subsequently clears such an area, the Board must answer
to the affected homeowners. While such occurrences have been infrequent, when
such an incident does occur, it is to no one's interest.
I feel the following course of action will address the concerns of the Board of
Superv isors:
1. All public utilities will be forwarded a listing of items under current
review by the Albemarle County Site Review Committee to make each utility
aware of potential development;
2. The County site plan ordinance requires that water, sewer, and other
utility layouts, both existing and proposed, be shown on the preliminary
site development plan. In cases where such utility easements may be
anticipated to interfere with required buffers, County staff will insist
on resolution prior to Planning Commission review. This measure can only
be practical if each utility is readily available to participate and
negotiate in the pre-planning process. A quick and cooperative response
is needed from each participant in order to avoid unnecessary delay to an
applicant in forwarding his project.
In closing, it does not appear that these problems have occurred frequently,
however, these situations are viewed as serious matters by the Board of (,_."'
Supervisors. A cooperative ~ffort between the County and the various utilities
can improve matters. Your increased cooperation in this matter is specifically
requested by Albemarle County.
FIRST RESPONSE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE AGENCY
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, in an effort to provide the citizens of
Albemarle County with immediate professional medical assis-
tance in life threatening emergencies, it is appropriate to
license a number of fire departments in the County as First
Response Emergency Medical Service (EMS) agencies;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this resolution
shall constitute a statement of need and approval of service
operation by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, for the following fire departments/companies to
serve as First Response EMS agencies:
East Rivanna Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.;
North Garden Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.;
Earlysville Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.;
Crozet Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.;
Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.;
Scottsville Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.;
Seminole Trail Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.; and
Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Authority.
As First Response EMS agencies, said fire departments
shall be subject to applicable rules and regulations of the
Virginia Department of Health, Division of Emergency Medical
Services, Section 3.6Cc)(3) of which requires this statement
of need and approval of s~rvice operation.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the forego-
ing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution unani-
mously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Alb~marle
County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 6, 1992.
Cler~.c~Y Supervi
I
I
Refuse Tipping Fee Discussion
May 6, 1992
Page 2 cf 2
B. EQUITY:
(1) There is an equity issue between providing subsidy for only
residential refuse. Should this subsidy apply to commercial and
deoris waste? .
(2) There is also an equity issue of providing a subsidy for
private haulers and not lndividual property owners who bring refuse
to the landfill.
C ACCOUNTING: Is there an effective way to account for refuse and ultimate
s\bsidy to the haulers and individuals who deliver their waste that does not
ircur costs that exceed the savings intended by the subsidy?
I
Staff hed looked at handling a subsidy of this nature by simply asking RSWA to keep a running
account bf each private hauler on a monthly basis and then crediting to that hauler the
subsidy that would be provided by the County which, in effect reduces the tip fee to the
consume l The only allocated funding source that we currently have available to us would be
the $10~1,000 reserve fund for solid waste to implement recycling and solid waste programs
that wo\ld be identified this summer. If this $100,000 subsidy were applied and returned to
the hau ers as a credit, staff estimates that the savings to citizens of the county using
private Irefuse collection would amount to approximately $.48 per month on an average,
assumin the savings would be passed on to the consumer. Unfortunately, administrative costs
for hancling the credit, maintaining proper accounting procedures and return of this subsidy
to the ~aulers could reduce the benefita of the $.48 savings per month. currently most of
the sUJ:rounding counties are planning to be charging a $40-$45fton tip fee at their
respect ve landfills.
I
RECO ATION:
After r~~iewing this matter for the past week, it is staff opinion that there are too many
potenti~l obstacles and issues that must be addressed before a subsidy of this nature can be
impleme~ted. To expedite this process in order to meet a July 1, 1992 deadline for
impleme ting a subsidy of this. nature is premature and would create problems for both the
haulers Rivanna Solid Waste Authority and the County of Albemarle. This type of study needs
further scrutiny, identification and elimination of any problems before implementation.
Further it is our opinion that the savings expected from the subsidy are relatively minor
when co sidering the expected offsetting administrative costs. For these reasons, staff does
not feeW it appropriate to expedite this matter and implement a subsidy at this time but
provide Istaff an opportunity to review this matter and make recommendation to you in late
summer pr early fall as originally planned. In addition, it is not recommended that a
differeptial fee for the County and the City be provided, i.e., maintaining a $32 fee in. the
county ~nd the City providing a $40 fee. This would create.an administrative nightmare for
RSWA as I well as for private haulers because of the mixed loads that are brought to the
landfilW by private haulers serving both the City and the County. It could be an enticement
for tho~e using the landfill to tell the weighmaster that their refuse is coming from the
County 'ecause of the lower tip fee rate.
fdbm
92.070
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
ARTICLE VII. REGIONAL JAIL BOARD, SECTION 2-42,
OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
nty, -Virginia, that Article VII, Regional Jail Board, Section
2, of the Code of Albemarle is hereby amended and reenacted to
d as follows:
2-42. Vacancies. removal from office' maximum number of
terms.
Members of the board in office on March 10, 1975, shall
tinue in office until the effective date of their replacement or
ointment provided for in the preceding section. Vacancies on
Charlottesville-Albemarle Regional Jail Board shall thereafter
filled for an unexpired term in the manner in which original
ointments are required to be made. Continued absence of any
er from regular meetings of the board shall, at the discretion
the ci.ty council and board of supervisors, render such member
Ie to immediate removal from office. No private citizen member
the board shall serve more than three consecutive three year
ms . ( 4 -1 7 - 7 5 .
For State authority see Virginia Code Section 53.1-106.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing i.s a true, correct copy of an ordinance adopted by the
Bard of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
r ular meeting held on May 6, 199~_~
Clerk, Board of County Sup
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the Board of supervisors supports the construction of
an extension of Berkrnar Drive north from Rio Road to the section of
Be krnar Drive fronted by the Agnor-Hurt Elementary School; and
WHEREAS, contracts and agreements between the County and
va ious property owners are necessary to complete this project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
emarle County, Virginia, that the Chairman is authorized to sign
Real Estate Sales Contract made on April 29, 1992, by and
ween Preston o. Stallings (seller) and the County of Albemarle
yer) a.nd, by adoption of this resolution, to also ratify the
ion Agreement signed by the County Engineer, Jo Higgins, made on
ruary 25, 1992, by and between Preston o. Stallings (grantor)
the County of Albemarle (grantee).
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
wr'ting is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Bo rd of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
re ular meeting held on May 6, l~.
Clerk, Board of ounty Supervisors
;
I
VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
V RGINIA
I
'jrECH
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
(804) 296-5803
April 10, 1992
'0' I. .lYY ~IRGINIA
b .,' tft~', . \J. )\0_ Pr-:~ '~ARt~
,..-, I "'0c~ ....:, TATE . .
l'.iu}t~;:.::.. "'!=;:u.~~~~
,/ \t'......'- J
'/.., },;...j,l.... '''"lIra;;
, ~.~--<< "" ftI' ~ ..." u
,;~,/f\@J ~iG. Siw~~
ro:
FROM:
D Jar Friends:
I I am Pleased'to announce the Youth-In-Government (YIG) Day for
We'stern Albemarle High School will be May 6. I sincerely hope that
o I your agency will be able to participate on this date.
Albemarle County Agencies
Youth-in-Government Day
Julie C. Coffman, Extension Agent/4-H rd. ~
and Departments Participating in
you
The objectives of the participating agencies are:
1. to provide students with an overall picture of howl county
government is structured and operated;
2. to give students a "micro-view" of county government by
providing on-the-job experiences in the various agencies
and departments of county government and its affiliates;
and,
3. to provide students with opportunities for career explora-
tion and employment possibilities.
Students from past YIG Days have enthusiastically endorsed the
e periences they've received from the program. These students will be
more responsible voters and are potential Albemarle County taxpayers.
Y~u and your agency or department have played an important role in this
I
p~ocess.
I The WAHS students will arrive at the Albemarle County Office
B~ilding at 9:30 A.M. They need to be back at the ACOB by 2:30 in the
a~ternoon. Please make note of this in your planning. These and other
d~tails are listed on the enclosed fact s~eet.
I Your department contact person should arrive at the Auditorium
b~tween 9:15 - 9:30 A.M. for the opening remarks.
I Thank you for your support of this program. Don't hesitate to
c 11 if you have any questions or need suggestions.
\'~I,~il,l.i<l. (:O(;I)t'I;~I~~I', t,ldt'lI,iOIl ~1'J\'i(,' ,i";I" Fill/( ,tlillll;11 ~t',\"ill' 01 IIU' \'i,~illia Pol)lt.( 11Ilil IIhlilllll' alltl .....';111' (!l\iU'I!ooily and Virf(ini.. Slaft. llnin.,..il\',
IIgl1l1.l.. ..1111. .1.11." .11l~1111l1l~11J': willi (1.". Ikp.IIIIlU'1I1 01 (\glll 11111111' and '. .oe-al (;O\l'IIIIIII'lIh (:ol.lp('lalill~, Plo~lalll'. ;1( li\iti('\, ,lIld f'mploYIJWnl'
llppOllllllllll" .11t ,1\.111.11111 10;111 pf'oph' ll'g;1I tl II'"'' oll;u f', (0101, Idl~IOll. "".... a.~f'. IUlioll,l1 oli~ill, h.Huhl ap. III polilicll aHiliatioll,
:\11 "flll.11 Oppolllllllly/allITlIMli,,';1C lioll f'lI1plo\f'l.
YOUTH-IN-GOVERNMENT DAY
Fact Sheet
1. There are two Youth-in-Government Days each year, one for
students at Albemarle High School and one for students at
Western Albemarle High School.
2. Government workers in the various agencies, departments,
commissions and courts sponsor one or more students for a brief
experience in the workings of government. It is a good opportu-
nity to convey the responsibilities of your office to the future
taxpayers of Albemarle County.
3. Participating students are selected by grade 12 government
teachers at the high schools. Selection of students is based
upon comments and qualifications made by the department/agency
heads, expressed student interest and an assessment of student
needs.
4 Students come from a diversity of backgrounds. You will have
students who are college-bound as well as those ready to enter
the job force in June. There will also be those who joined the
armed forces.
5 Government personnel are encouraged to place their students in
activities which require a great deal of student involvement,
(planning, decision-making, role playing). Agencies may share
students if there are not enough appropriate activities to fill
a day's experience.
6 I Students are most enthusiastic about in-the-field experiences.
Planning special projects for the day, such as on-site inspect-
ions, clean-up crew at parks, etc., are particularly good.
7 Each student is told to bring money for lunch or a bag lunch,
depending on your desire.
8. Each department/agency needs to designate a contact person.
That person will fill out the contact person's data sheet and
will be responsible for picking up their students at the opening
ceremony in the Albemarle County Office Building Auditorium.
The contact person then takes them to their place of work and
returns them to the County Office Building parking lot at the
end of the day. Exact times for these activities are:
Date School Opening 'Return to
Ceremony Parking Lot
May 6, 1992 WAHS 9:35 a.m. 2:30 p.m.
5 . Questions: Call Julie Coffman, 296-5803
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
YOUTH-IN-GOVERNMENT DAY
CONTACT PERSON DATA SHEET
WESTERN ALBEMARLE HIGH SCHOOL
May 6, 1992
1 Name
2 I
Agency
Phone
3 Position
4 Describe Your Job Briefly
5~i How many years have you been in this position?
I
p~ease return this to Julie Coffman at Albemarle County Office Build-
i~g, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22901 (phone 296-5803).
I
Please return by Monday, April 27, 1992
WESTERN ALBEMARLE HIGH SCHOOL
YOUTH-IN-GOVERNMENT DAY
May 6, 1992
Agency/Department Participation Form
1 County Department/Agency/Commission or Court
2 Number of students you wish
3 Position to be filled and number desired
(i.e., department head, 3 secretaries, 4 inspectors, etc.)
4 Nature of job (including preparation to be done by student in
advance, (i.e., research in library, telephone call to
participating agency, etc)
5 Should students bring: (1) lunch, (2) money for lunch, or
(3) either?
6 Comments:
P lease return this form by Monday, April 27, 1992 to Julie Coffman,
E 'tension Agent/ 4-H, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22901
~ ~~ ~~/~.;l.
(3(' ~~ C!-
League of Women Voters of Charlottesville and Albemarle County
413 East Market Street, Room 203, Charlottesville, VA 22902
Phone: (804) 972-1795
May 6, 1992
10: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
F om: League of Women Voters of Charlottesville and Albemarle County
I
e:
I
1 want to commend you for appointing and providing staff for the Albemarle County Housing
A 'visory Committee as the League and others urged you to do, We have monitored the committee's
p ogress and were consistently impressed with the dedication and amount of effort expended in this
st Idy,
It il no secret that the County has a problem, whether it is the 1 percent of county households living
in tents, buses, or campers; the 1,200 people living in over-crowded conditions, the 5,000 people
w 10 can barely afford their housed, or the 3,000 people whose dwellings are in need of major repairs,
T l League applauds the quality and comprehensiveness of the Housing Advisory Committee's
re lort, We won't comment on individual points at this time, but we urge your serious consideration
o ~ll the recommendations of the report, We charge you to take leadership in analyzing Albemarle
C ~nty' s housing problems and in getting the necessary commitment from the whole community to
I
a dress them, We recognize that this will require staff, resources, and an on-going committee if the
I
pr blems are to be tackled successfully,
Housing Committee Report
Item on the Board's May 6, 1992 Meeting Agenda
Supervisors, you are in a position to insure that something is done to address many of the
C unty's housing problems, The League hopes to have an opportunity to discuss strategies at a
p ~lic hearing in the very near future and urge you to set a date for that hearing today,
I
T ank you,
"...a non:pa tisan organization d"eaicatea to tfie yromotion of informed" ana active yarticijJation of citizens in government. "
RAY D, PE HTEL
COMMISSI NER
COUNTY OF AtHEr !~ARlE
~.. F-' ~ ~ :'lj~ rm
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA, fl':/ .""1 .~ lCe? . / il
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION !J \ 1'" _ 1111
P. o. BOX 2013 \. .~..: U
CHARLOTTESVILLE,22902 .nC" D~.~, ~qQSs~Eq5
RESIDENT ENGINEER
Distributed to Board: .s - ( ~ Cj y
A~end3 Item No, q cf. {)5dP (5. J)
'.~
April 13, 1992
Route 660
Addition/Abandonment
Hi l Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Bo Ird of Supervisor
40 I McIntire Road
Ch 'rlottesville, VA 22901
De Ir Ms. Neher:
I Attached is a resolution and a copy of the required sketch to accomplish the
ad ition and abandonment on Route 660. Please return one copy of the properly
si In resolution and sketch to this office.
Yours truly,
~~~;fL
Contract Administrator
GG /yrm
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
.-/
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
At a regular meeting of the Board
A bemarle County held this 6th day of
i ! was duly moved and seconded that:
of
Mav
Supervisors of
,19 ~,
WHEREAS, Secondary Route 660 from 0.21 miles north of Route
1 30 to 0.29 miles north of Route 1530, a distance of 0.08 miles
a~d Route 660 from 0.29 miles north of Route 1530 to 0.42 miles
ndrth of Route 1530 a distance of 0.13 miles, a total of 0.21
m~les, has been altered, and a new road has been constructed and
adproved by the State Highway Commissioner, which new road
s~rves the same citizens as the road so altered.
I WHEREAS, certain sections of this new road follow new
lpcations, these being shown on the attached sketch titled
"Changes in the Secondary System due to the Relocation and
Cdnstruction of Route 660, Project 0660-002-187,C501,C502,
AWbemarle County", dated at Charlottesville, Virginia, February
1~, 1992.
I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the portions of
s~condary Route 660, i.e., Section 3 and 4, shown in red on the
t.:
a~orementioned sketch, a total of 0.21 miles be and hereby is,
a~ded to the Secondary System of State Highways pursuant to
s~ction 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended;
I And further, that the sections of old location, i.e.,
S~ction 1 and 2 on the aforementioned sketch, a total distance
o~ 0.23 miles, be, and the same hereby is abandoned as a public
rRad pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia of
1 50 as amended.
* * * * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher
f regoing writing is
a~opted by the Board
r~gular meeting held on
I
do hereby certify that the
a true, correct copy of a resolution
of Supervisors of Albemarle County at a
May 6, 1992 .
~.~
Clerk, County Board of Supervisors
~
6
'"
to
-
I
g
I
o
lJl
,
()
,,-
to
-
I
g
i
oow
. .
.
00
':HX Y1S
H"/.+Z7Y1S
"
N
,..
E .u
10 c.J
ci Q)
CI)
-<t .~
. E
//
~' ..'
.. ~O~/
,..~~~ ~ ~ /"~ C')
/ r:,O.I~~~' E .
~~/ ~ ]
,l Y.J.S
/
./
//;'/
//;'1
//;'1
//;'1
Cll
.u
CI)
Cll
.u
CI) -0
.,.
1-
.D
"'II
-
o
.....
.
'-
. E
.uoo
c.J 0
Q) ,
CI) 0
.u
c.J Q)
Q) ,...
r:: ....,.....
:3.u~.u
o r::
"0 ~ p,. Q)
~ElQ)""
CllQ).uO
al:>al~
,... Cll M
.0 p,. p,. El ..;
El ,... (,)
M"OOOal
M c:: c.J ~
Cll Cll ~
Q) II"t ,...
alen..t:lp,.
:>Q).uCl)
..... bO ~ ~
bO Cll ,... H 0
Q) 0
lliM~.u..t:
en..... ......u
CllElQ)ElbO
Q) p,..o c::
Mll-;>.::lQ)
~o.uenM
4,
"V
:;
~.
A.., c,
~
4,~
",0
1I
-1.1
o
z:
o
o
+
\0
.....
Cll
.u
CI)
'~
. ~ \\
~ ~
~~
~
><
H
Z
:::>
o
u'
~
Ai'
Zoo
<.....
I
ZN
00
HO
HI
<0
U\O
0\0
...:l0
W
r:t:: ..
H
OU
HW
IJ
Wo
:::>r:t::
A~
W
...:l
r:t::
<
~
W
l:Q
...:l
<
~ ~
WO
H\O
CI)\o
><
Cl)W
H
><:::>
r:t::O
<r:t::
A
ZZ
00
u
WZ
Cl)0
H
ZH
HU
:::>
Wr:t::
C-'H
ZCI)
<Z
::I: 0
UU
~
~
~cs:.
~
N
o
II"t
U
e
Q)
.u
en.
>.
VJ
.....
o
II"t
U
>.
,...
Cll
"0
r::
o
c.J
al
CI)
"0
Q)
"0 ::l
c::
Q) .....
r:: .u
0 r::
"0 0
r:: (,)
Cll en
.0 .~
Cll "0
Q) Q)
.0 .0
o
.u
"0
Q)
"0
"0
Cll
Q)
.0
o
.u
o
.u
o
.u
r::
o
.....
.u
Cll
(,)
o
M
r::
o
.....
.u
Cll
c.J
o
M
r::
o
.....
.u
Cll
(,)
o
M
"0
M
o
"0
M
o
:3
Q)
r::
ll-;
o
ll-;
o
ll-;
o
r::
o
.....
.u
(,)
Q)
CI)
r::
o
.....
.u
(,)
al
CI)
r::
o
.....
.u
(,)
Q)
CI)
101
.bO
en r::
c::.~ N
Cll,...O\
,... Q) 0\
Hal.....
r::
~..... ~
o bOO\
r::.....
.W
.u >.
0. (,) ,...
Q) ..... Cll
A ll-; ::l
ll-; ,...
. Cll .0
<1l H Q)
>H~
[,
.'~~
-L . ~.
~~w~
Edward H. Sai J Jr.
Samuel Mille I
David P. Sowe man
Chadollesvill I
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jack Jouett
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
M'E M 0 RAN DUM
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
Hoyt B. Alford, III, Civil Engineer
Engineering Department
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CM~
May 7, 1992
F
s
Resolution Requesting Acceptance of Marshall Court into
the State System of Secondary Highways
At its meeting on May 6, 1992, the Board of Supervisors
a opted the following resolution requesting the Highway Department
t I accept Marshall Court into the State Secondary System of
H'ghways. Attached is the signed resolution.
I
I
A tachments:
:ec
L
Original and 3 copies of each
..-
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE-IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
unty, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section
1.1-229, the Virginia Department of Transportation be and
I hereby requested to accept into the Secondary System of
ghways, subject to final inspection and approval by the
'sident Highway Department, the following road in Marshall
'nor Subdivision:
Marshall Court:
Beginning at Station -00+50, a point common to the
centerline of Marshall Court and the edge of pave-
ment of State Route 20, thence in a southeasterly
direction 340.00 feet to Station 2+90, offset
25.00 feet in a southwesterly direction, thence in
a southeasterly direction 50.00 feet, the end of
the cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of
T ansportation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unob-
s 'ructed right-of-way and drainage easements along this
r Iquested addition as recorded by plats in the Office of the
circuit Court Clerk of Albemarle County in Deed Book 573,
I
P ge 249; and Deed Book 1216, page 687.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the fore-
g ing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution
u 'animously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
C 'unty, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 6, 1992.
~6/;
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
.._1 -..
llistributed to Board: 0-/ ~:z ~)
Agenda Item No. C/:<. tJ~ 6-7'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTY OF AlBE:MARL~
..- :.ru
o
MEMORANDUM
5O'Wl or SU~~~
\0. ...-........:-...,... ~....._.-,"~... ... .- .......t. .
TO: Lettie E. Neher, Board of supervisors Clerk
I FROM:
!OATE:
IRE:
I
!he following is a description
arshall Manor Subdivision.
I
arshall Court
I
Hoyt B. Alford III, civil Engineer, ~ ~,ag~
17 April 1992
Marshall Manor Subdivision - Marshall Court
of Marshall Court located in the
leginning at station -00+50, a point common to the centerline of
arshall Court and the edge of pavement of State Route 20,
'hence in southeasterly direction 340.00 feet to station 2+90,
'ffset 25.00 feet in a southwesterly direction, thence in a
outheasterly direction 50.00 feet, the end of the cuI de sac.
I
his road has a fifty (50) foot right-of-way and has been built
In accordance with the approved road plans. The deed book
'eferences for right-of-way dedication and drainage easements
I
re deed book 573, page 249 and deed book 1216, page 687.
I
f you have any questions, please advise.
,
I
'BA/
I
I
"---
.-
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD MEMBE:RS
ON 5 -1- '1 J-
. COUNTY OF Ad3E.MA~U::
o fCil.~rr;J'~
(\'; .AFR 301992,
1.1 .,.,
I U ~': l.~, :.: ;'-!J1T1f:~
tfUAhf) CCITEM:IIDI=D\lICERC):RS
AGENDA DATE: NUMB
May 6, 1992 9,;/,050(" ~G)
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA
Public
Buffers
and
Required
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
UEST:
procedures to avoid
required buffer
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:--2L-
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: one
STAFF C
Messrs.
REVIEWED BY:
Cilimberg.
BACKGRO
At your September 18, 1991 meeting, you directed staff to provide recommendations on ways to
ensure hat identified landscaping in required buffer areas remain undisturbed during
develop rto
DISCUSS ON:
The att ched memorandum addresses this request and makes two specific recommendations for
your co sideration and approval.
I
RECO ATION:
Approve the recommendations and authorize the County Executive to sign the proposed letter.
I
92.062
DRAFT
T e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has requested that I encourage all
p blic utilities operating in the County to be mindful of requirements imposed
u on private development, particularly in regard to avoiding destruction of
r quired buffer areas/landscaping. The County often requires undisturbed buffers
a d/or additional landscaping between dissimilar uses such as residential
d velopment and a commercial site.
e tioUS1Y, when a utility subsequently clears such an area, the Board must answer
tithe affected homeowners. While such occurrences have been infrequent, when
s ch an incident does occur, it is to no one's interest.
I
I
I feel the following course of action will address the concerns of the Board of
S pervisors:
I
1 All public utilities will be forwarded a listing of items under current
review by the Albemarle County Site Review Committee to make each utility
aware of potential development;
2 The County site plan ordinance requires that water, sewer, and other
utility layouts, both existing and proposed, be shown on the preliminarv
site development plan. In cases where such utility easements may be
anticipated to interfere with required buffers, County staff will insist
on resolution prior to Planning Commission review. This measure can only
be practical if each utility is readily available to participate and
negotiate in the pre-planning process. A quick and cooperative response
is needed from each participant in order to avoid unnecessary delay to an
applicant in forwarding his project.
I closing, it does not appear that these problems have occurred frequently,
h wever, these situations are viewed as serious matters by the Board of
S pervisors. A cooperative effort between the County and the various utilities
c r improve matters. Your increased cooperation in this matter is specifically
r ~ested by Albemarle County.
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
f~ ,., :: r... · " ". '. '':\
~. '~t" - - ~.Q .~ t.. ....,,~
. i, ..~ ~, L.{.. \-;;
'~'l ,\';1:0
~. ., '. APR 7 1992 ';. '"
~. 1.. ti
ii I, II
~ ": : _._' -i.'~ ,_..... J ~
.....L. . (
'r .....
EXECUTIVE OFRCE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Bob Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and/tJJ~
Community Development [/L
TO:
DATE:
April 6, 1992
RE:
PUBLIC UTILITIES AND REQUIRED BUFFERS/LANDSCAPING
The Board of Supervisors has directed staff to develop a
strategy to avoid destruction of required buffer
areas/landscaping for approved developments. This request
seemed to result from Virginia Power clearing along the
frontage of the Colonnades on Barracks Road. My
understanding is that staff was aware of various utility
easements at time of earlier rezoning and subsequently
negotiated a 60 foot buffer from Barracks Road. I am told
that since adoption of the 1980 Zoning Ordinance, the. only
unanticipated problem of this type occurred when a utility
cleared a required buffer between Townwood and Garden Court.
I understand that, in that case, the developer of Garden
Court re-established a combination landscape/fencing buffer.
Prior to this request from the Board, staff has worked with
the Albemarle County Service Authority, Virginia Power, and
the Virginia Department of Transportation as to landscaping
plantings permissible within easements/rights-of-way. The
Albemarle County Service Authority and Virginia Power have
been very cooperative in developing/providing staff with
listings of acceptable plantings. It should be noted that
most utilities operating in the County (about five (5)
electric companies, four (4) phone companies, and two (2)
water and sewer authorities) are relatively tolerant of
, ..
v. Wayne cilimberg
April 6, 1992
Page 2
plant growth in their easements.
that public utility distribution
by-right in all zoning districts
the Planning staff must continue
cooperation.
It should also be noted
systems are permitted
and, therefore, I believe
to work in a spirit of
Given this background, I recommend the following strategy:
1. sections 32.5.6 (k) and (1) of the Zoning Ordinance
requires that water, sewer, and other utility layouts,
both existing and proposed, be shown on the preliminary
site development plan. In cases where such easements
may be anticipated to interfere with required buffers,
staff will insist on resolution prior to Planning
Commission review. The Board can anticipate complaint
from applicants as to delay resulting from negotiations
among the utilities, applicant and staff;
2. A letter should be sent to all utilities operating in
the County requesting cooperation in this matter,
including quick response to an applicant's pre-planning
request. This letter would have greater import over
signature of the Board's Chairman or County Executive.
(I have attached a sample letter.)
In closing, it does not appear that these problems have
occurred frequently. A cooperative effort between the County
and the various utilities could improve matters. It does
not appear that direct regulation of utilities is warranted
either in terms of problem incidents or additional costs of
any such regulation to the general public.
RSK/mem
Attachment
cc: Ron Keeler
Distributed to Board: :2>- -;-9~
Agenda Item No, ~.,{, ()S;cr;{5: '!)
I
ATEMENTS OF EXPENSES
I'd
: State Compensatlon Boar
r: Month of A/r/~, /?,?J--
County Share
State Share
Total
DE ARTMENT OF FINANCE:
/5/? 7/
/~/;; 72-
.:3 C1:3.5;' t!3
SH RIFF:
~-
--0-
CO ONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY:
-0-
-0-
RE IONAL JAIL:
~o-
-0_
No e: Expenses listed above are only those office expenses in
wh'ch the State Compensation Board has agreed to participate, and
ar not the total office expenses of these departments.
)
I
J,
f
I
....
1
.~
j
;1
I
.
,
I
I
~
1
,
'j
I
I
,
DIstributed to Board: ,.:.., . - J =-,~ _)
q:;. .()eJa ~S"./
~en~amWy OF ALBEMARL~
.~ ~
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Q1"\.\ en n~ "I InC,",I"<-""'nc
.... ........ _.L~ ........ .......
AGENDA
EMS/Fir
ITLE:
t Responder
I
I
Service
AGENDA DATE:
May 6, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
9)( I OStJU.
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT PROPOSAL
In ord r for Albemarle County Fire
Departm nts to continue providing "First
Respond r" service to the County, each
station Imust be licensed by the State.
This li ense requires Board of Supervisors'
acknowl dgement that the service is being
provide Iby the departments.
I
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: ~
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF C
Messrs.
REVIEWED BY:
and Huff
BACKGRO
The att ched resolution will meet the requirements of the State Division of Emergency Medical
Service for the County to hold a combined license for all of the County's fire departments
to prov'de "First Responder" level of medical care. The Fire Chiefs voted to ask the County
to proc re the license so that each individual station did not have to handle the paperwork
involve ~ The license will be monitored by our Volunteer Fire/Rescue Coordinator. At the
present ltime, five of eight county departments are proceeding through the licensing
procedu e, however, the attached resolution will cover all of the departments should the
other tree non-participants decide to proceed in the future. Crozet and Scottsville do not
feel th I need to provide the service at this time due to their proximity to an adjacent
rescue quad and the Airport does not wish to be involved at this time due to the different
level 0 I service they provide.
I
sponder service is a basic level of emergency medical care to be provided by fire
nt personnel should they arrive on scene before a rescue squad. In the outlying
!the County, given our location of fire stations, it is often quicker to get fire
1 to the scene of a medical emergency before a rescue squad can arrive.
i
the adoption of the attached resolution.
92.053
FIRST RESPONSE EMERGENCY MEDICAL
RESOLUTION
sEiillfPW
WHEREAS, in an effort to provide the citizens of
Albemarle County with immediate professional medical assis-
tance in life threatening emergencies, it is appropriate to
license a number of fire departments in the County as First
Response Emergency Medical Service (EMS) agencies;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this resolution
shall constitute a statement of need and approval of service
operation by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, for the following fire departments/companies to
serve as First Response EMS agencies:
East Rivanna Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.;
North Garden Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.;
Earlysville Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.;
Crozet Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.;
Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.;
Scottsville Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.;
Seminole Trail Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.; and
Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Authority.
As First Response EMS agencies, said fire departments
shall be subject to applicable rules and regulations of the
Virginia Department of Health, Division of Emergency Medical
Services, Section 3.6(.c)(3) of which requires this statement
of need and approval of s~rvice operation.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the forego-
ing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution unani-
mously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 6, 1992.
Cler~ .C~ty Supervi rs
FIRST RESPONSE EMS AGENCY RESOLUTION
I
I
IS First Response EMS agencies, said fire departments shall be
'ubject to applicable rules and regulations of the Virginia
,epartment of Health, Division of Emergency Medical Services,
ection 3.6(c) (3) of which requires this statement of need and
I ..
pproval of serv1ce operat10n.
East Rivanna Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.
North Garden Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.
Earlysville Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Crozet Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company, Inc.
scottsville Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Seminole Trail Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Authority
I
I
,
D ~TE i71! &/ 19'7.2-
I
A ~ENDA ITEM NO. 9;(. (j.S7/(P ( ~ (p)
A ~ENDA ITEM NAME ~J'~ ~ C~~CX-
D ~ UNTIL TYiMj /3, /-:()O jJ/Y1
J^/0k ~ S?J7~
Form. 3
7/25/86
I
I
. "-
!
Distributed to 'Board: ~ - / -1 d-
Agenda Item No. q;{. 050{q~.1)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
I
I
: FROM:
I
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
DATE:
I
IRE:
I
I
April 17, 1992
Route 29 North
~nterchanqes ~~
I
I
S ~eral weeks ago, you requested staff to follow up on a comment
m de by Secretary Milliken related to the interchanges proposed
a long Route 29 North. I have attached a copy of the Virginia
D partment of Transportation's procedure for advanced acquisition
a well as a letter from Mr. J. W. Jenkins via Mr. Tom Farley. I
h ve discussed this matter with Mr. Farley further and he indicates
t at the difference between the Alternative 10 By-Pass advanced
a quisition and the interchanges along Route 29 are that advanced
a quisition funds were provided for Alternative 10 at the time of
te location hearing and funds are used to purchase, for the most
p rt, the entire tract of property whether it is contained wholly
o I partially within the proposed right-of-way of Alternative 10.
I
,
F r commercial interchanges like that found along Route 29 North,
V loT does not purchase right-of-way through its advanced
a 'quisition procedure until they have more definitive design plans
s that they can purchase only those tracts which will be affected
b i the interchange. That is to say, portions of tracts would be
p rchased as well as entire tracts if the right-of-way necessitates
i. The primary reason for these differences is that with the
A ~ternative 10 alignment, they feel they can afford to purchase an
e 'tire tract because the majority of the property is rural or
r sidential in nature and would not be as costly as commercial
p operty where they would purchase only the land that was directly
a ,fected by the right-of-way needs of an interchange.
I
S ould you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
h sitate to contact me.
I
I
R T,Jr/dbm
9.082
I
A tachment
Distributed to Board: .5-(- '7 ;)..
Agenda Item No, q:<, ~~O&(S,8)
--.,;,
I
I
I
RAY D. PE ~TEl
COMMISSI NER
i
. COtJNTV OF AtBEM,ARtE
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI~] r.~~\';.:'7'?JE.0llE~.::-, p
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION tu Ii ',' \r. ~l
1401 EAST BROAD STREET r:(~ ~,P~" '.211'1tm11 I).,F
RICHMOND 23219 . ~~ /,1 \. I
. 'll . '/1
I \' t'.~,. ""~.' Y ,. f..... ./' \ I
April 20, 1992 -d~=d:.~:).!~!urlll! TI::J UJ
BOARD ,CfF '9UfHE1Wf~@"'f.~
Secondary System
Addition
Albemarle County
I
Bard of Supervisors
I
C unty of Albemarle
I
4 1 McIntire Road
C ~r1ottesvi11e, VA 22901
I
I
DITION
I
W NDRIFT
R 1573 (Windrift Drive) - From Route 664 to 0,59 mile West
R 664
As requested in your resolution dated February 5, 1992, the following
a ~ition to the Secondary System of Albemarle County is hereby approved,
e fective April 1, 1992,
I
LENGTH
0.59 Mi
Sincerely,
I?;:!'D.~~
Commissioner
(J.a : h!~.
I
f!annl,j
; /7/JUth'/]J
I .
-~~{;
I
I
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
I
I
Edward H. Sai ,Jr.
Samuel Mille I
David P. Sowe ri,an
Charlottesvill I
I
Charlotte Y. H mphris
Jock Jouell I
@@wW
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
May 11, 1992
I
I
j . .
Ra D. Pethtel, CommlSSloner
Vi'ginia Department of Transportation
14 '1 East Broad street
Ri'hmond, Virginia 23219
I
I
De r Mr. Pethtel:
I
Yo'r recent letter to me of April 22, 1992 requested the Board of
Su'ervisors seek the cooperation of the Virginia Outdoors
Fo . ndation in replacing the sub-standard bridge at Millington.
This matter was on the Board's agenda on May 6, 1992. The members
of It he Board were informed of your letter but no discussion nor
ac'ion was taken by the Board in response to your request.
Thl Board is aware that you will continue to inspect the bridge
e I ry six months. I ask that the Department keep this Board
ap'rised of the results of these inspections and any subsequent
ac ions that you intend to pursue.
I
Sincerely,
(j)ft#~~
David P. Bowerman,
Chairman
/dbm
019
Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer, VDOT
. .
. .
Distributed to Soard: -S-/ - i(~L.,
Agenda Item No. q.;L '~O{,($.V
..!
RAY D, PE HTEL
COMMISSI NER
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA COU11rv 1.1 ,~_br.h~~:<lX-
m r -, "J/"--~'
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 If.."" .~ .. ~" -~.
1401 EAST BROAD STREET i. i .' ~
RICHMOND, 23219 f: \ \ \ \.~ j) ~n
Ull\ 4 _'~'
April 22, 1992 .. -:..-..;...":" UpER"'SO' DC.
&,ARO Of ~U :"I ~''.1
This is in response to your letter to Mr. John G. Milliken of
bruary 12 and the February 5, 1992, resolution of the Albemarle
unty Board of Supervisors, concerning the bridge over the
orman's River on Route 671 at Millington. This amendment of
p evious Board resolutions asked whether the Intermodal Surface
T ansportation Efficiency Act of 1991 would allow the construction
0' a bridge with reduced design standards on the location of the
p esent bridge, without change in approach alignment.
e Honorable David P. Bowerman, Chairman
bemarle County Board of Supervisors
1 McIntire Road
arlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
ar Mr. Bowerman:
The Board's question was reviewed by the Federal Highway
ministration, which responded as follows (in part):
Although Section 1016(e) of the 1991 Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act allows reduced standards
for preserving historic or scenic values, it also
requires measures to ensure the safe use of the facility.
The S-type configuration of the approach road on the
south side of the existina bridae with 40 and 80 dearee
.J .J .J
horizontal curves clearly compromises the safety of a
replacement facility which utilizes the existing
approaches. On a recent field review of the existing
bridge, we noted evidence of vehicle impacts on the
approach guardrail and bridge truss sections which are
indicative of operational and safety problems. . we
have determined that the proposed design exception is
clearly inappropriate for this project.
An early planning option to replace the bridge where it now
sands, but straightening the approaches, was previously rejected
b the Board of Supervisors in favor of lithe green line," and as
t e bridge has been designed (at considerable expense) on the green
1 ne, I believe we have come full circle on this issue.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
~I... 4/IS}i2-
}lxJ
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D, PE HTEL
COMMISSI NER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 671
CULPEPER, 22701
THOMAS F. FARLEY
DISTRICT ENGINEER
April 15, 1992
Mr.
Albe
401
Char
obert W. Tucker
arle County Executive
'clnti re Road
lor:e.i;ille VA 22901
MV:::: ucker:
Dear
he attached offers some information for the difference between
hard hip acquisition on Alignment 10 and advanced acquisitions for the
inte changes at Greenbrier, Rio, and Hydraulic Roads.
me know if you need anything further.
Very ruly yours,
Thorn s F. Farley
TFF: cs
,
Atta
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
.'--.:......:,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
INTRA-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
I
TO
Mr. Thomas F. Farley
Culpeper, Virginia
FROM
J. Y. Jenkins
April 6, 1992
SUBJECT
i
Advanced Property Acquisitions for
Greenbrier, Rio, and Hydraulic Road Interchanges
The current schedule for Plan Development of Phase II will start in 1994 for
Hydraulic Road Interchange, 1996 for Greenbrier Road Interchange, and 1998
for Rio Road Interchange. According to Y. Y. Jenkins there are no preliminary
plans of any kind on Hydraulic or Greenbrier. As part of the preliminary
planning for the 29 Corridor, the Interchange of Rio Road was included.
However, the interchange design is considered to be very preliminary with a
~trong possibility of change. For example, Hydraulics were given very little
consideration and Storm Yater Management was given no consideration.
I
A quick review of the current schedule reflects no funds allocated to either
Interchange for Right of Yay Acquisition. Loretta Cummings confirmed this
morning that no Environmental documents have been prepared on any of the
Interchange projects.
I
Even if funds were made available, we still would not be in a position to
I
purchase advance acquisitions in light of the plan situation. It should be
kept in mind with Alternative 10, we are only acquiring total acquisitions
and we have aerial photographs showing approximate limits of right of way.
In summary, it is not practical or for that matter possible to acquire
property rights for the Interchanges at this time.
I
~ttachment
cc: Mr. J.
att:
Mr. D.
att:
A. DePasquale
Mr. Y. Y. Jenkins
S. Bywaters
Mrs. Loretta Cummings
"" --',&
~
703
Revised 11-89
SECTION 703
PROCEDURES.FOR ADVANCED ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY
Advanced Acquisitions will normally be initiated to either
~liminate a hardship or
'1
burchase) .
to prevent development
(Protective
J . Hardship Acquisitions
Advance acquistion due to hardship will apply, for the most
part, to owner-occupants of real property who have been placed
in an extraordinary or emergency situation due to an impending
highway project.
In rare instances I an owner of income pro-
dueing at vacant property may also be eligible for advance
hardship acquisi tion.
The Distr ict shall indicate that the
following requirements have been satisfied prior to requesting
hardship approval:
o
A wr i tten request from the property owner for hard-
ship acquisition setting forth the nature of the
hardship.
1
.#. --~. ..
-,
703
Revised 11-89
o
Documentation of inability to sell property at a reason-
able pr ice as a result of highway project development'.
Hardship acquisition cases will typically fall under one of the
t'N'O following categories:
1. Health
a. Advanced age, debilitating illness or injury, or
ambulatory or other major disability or handicap
of a long-term nature, where present housing
facilities are inadequate or cannot be maintained
by owner.
b. Other extraordinary conditions which pose a sig-
nificant threat to the health, safety, and/or
welfare of the owner-occupant or a member of his
household for whom he is responsible.
2
703
'Revised 11-89
2. Financial'
a. tit.igation (probate) to include copies of estate
proceeding documents ver ifying the indicated
situation.
b. Loss of employment as ver ified by employer or
other source.
c. Retirement (cannot afford maintenance) to in-
clude amounts actually spent on maintenance as
compared to rent, income, etc.
d. Pending mortgage foreclosure, tax sales, etc., to
include copies of actual documents.
e. Transfer of job as verified by employer.
f. Any documented situation similar in impact to
those stated above.
Qualifications for hardship acquisition must be fully documented.
Examples of acceptable documentation would include where
appropJ~ iate:
"
3
703
!. Revised. 11-89
1. Doctor's statement. A doctor's statement clearly and
fully describin~why the patient should relocate .from
a medical viewpoint.
2. Real estate broker certification. A real estate
broker's statement indicating that the property in
question is not marketable and t therefore, listing
same would be futile along with the reasons.
3. Financial statement. Where financial difficulties
cansti tute the reasons for acquis i tion, a reliable,
accurate, and complete discussion is appropriate.
4. Letter from employer. A letter from the employer
certifying th~t the affected owner is to be
transferred to a specific location would. be
recognized when applicable. A similar certification
regarding loss of employment would likewise
consti tute adequate documentation where such is the
ration~le for advance acquisition.
4
703
( .
Revised 11-89
s. Court record.
.
Copies of documents relating to any
legal actions which provide support for the indicated
hardship.
6. Income tax return.
Aver ification of that part of
the
return
necessary to support
the
hardship
situation will suffice in lieu of copies of the
return.
he above is not all inclusive since it is not possible to describe
very conceivable source that could constitute appropriate documen-
ation for a given situation.
There will be times \lIhen the above
ocumentation, even though logical for the case involved, cannot be
ecured.
Where this si tuation is encountered, it is acceptable to
rovide alternative data that accomplishes the same objectives.
Protective Purchase
In those cases where substantial and eminent property de vel-
pment might unduly restrict the only reasonable highway location
5
703
Revised 11-99
a ternative, protective purchase may be the only practical method of
a leviatlng the problem. The Dis'tr ict may request Advanced ,Acquisi-
t on to protect the public inter~st. Such request must demonstrate
t at there are no other reasonable alternatives.
C A request for Advanced Acquisi tion may be considered pc ior to
c mpletion of the final environmental impact statement or adoption
o the negative declaration but cannot be considered prior to the
1 cation hear lng process. Favorable board action on the location
blie hearing must be completed prior to making a request. In
ose instances where the acquistion will be a partial take, it is
i perative that utility easement requirements be included in the
All requests for Advanced Acquisition should be submitted
the State Right of Way Engineer. Each request should include the
r qui red documentation along wi th the estimated cost. The State
R ght of Way Engineer will review the request and recommend appro-
p iate a<::tion.
6
Distributed to Board: S--( -~.,1-
Agenda Item No. qd. 050(; !$/t)
I
I
RAY D, PE HTEL
COMMISSI NER
I
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 671
CULPEPER, 22701
COUNiV OF ALetMA~lE
D APR d~~;Jm
BOADD ^ 1)lOMAS Fol'llilll
1\ - I ~ .t(DIS'r:fiI~~l!i$6~S
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
April 23, 1992
Mr. David Bowerman, Chairman
Alb marle Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Cha lottesville, Virginia 22901
I
I
Dea iMr. Bowerman:
I
thank you for your comment regarding the interstate/primary/
urb n roadway systems in Culpeper District. Each year the individual
dis ricts hold a preallocation hearing to solicit local government and
citizen participation in identifying and prioritizing roadway needs.
I
I
Your interest is appreciated, and your concerns have been made a
partlof the public record for the Preallocation Hearing held on March
31 1
. I
:lcs
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
RAY D, P THTEL
I
COMMISSI NEA
Distributed to Board: ~- -(- 9.;J-
Agenda Item No, 7:2. bCOt., (5:11)
... ~~~W
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI.tk:~~11JJ
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD OF SIJPER
1401 EAST BROAD STREET . "" . V'SO~S
RICHMOND. 23219
April 27, 1992
Secondary System
Addition
Albemarle County
Bard of Supervisors
C ~nty of Albemarle
4 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, VA 22901
BERS OF THE BOARD:
As requested in your resolution dated February 12, 1992, the following
a dition to the Secondary System of Albemarle County is hereby approved,
e ~ective April 13, 1992,
ITION
LENGTH
'LOW LAKE
te 1135 (Willow Lake Drive) - From Route 1136 to 0,13 mile
thwest Route 1136
O. 13 Mi
Sincerely,
4a~'~
Commissioner
~C:~~
M CL~fl~ ~
~~)
~.~
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
.-'
RAY D, PE HTEL
COMMISSI ~ER
~
Distributed to Doard~ ..5;; / -c.~~
Agenda Item No. :22, ()!iX(~/:y
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. 0, BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902
April 29 1992
\ I ~
"
.t
D, S, ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
u~'L ,.
BO.xRO C\-' .....
_ ,_, ,,8
Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Miss Neher:
Attached is the list of construction projects underway
in Albemarle County. Please make this information available
to the Board for their May 6, 1992 meeting.
Yours Truly,
j/,J I?~
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
"....."../..
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
MAY 1, 1992
+------+ ------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
IROUTE I
INO. I 1
LOCATION
STATUS
EST.COMP I
DATE 1
+------+ ------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I I
I 250 ST. CLAIR AVE. TO RTE. 64 I CONSTRUCTION 35% COMPLETE SEP 93
I I
+------+ ------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I 1 I I I
I 729 I INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - SHADWELL I CONSTRUCTION 5% COMPLETE 1** AUG 92
1 I I 1
+------+ ------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
1
I I I
I I I I
+------+ ~-----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+ I
I I I I
1 1 I
I I I
+------+ ------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
+------+ +-----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
* REVH ED DATE
** NEW FIROJECT
~-' .-.. ..
Distributed to Board: 5"'/ - q 2
Agenda Item No. q~, ()~tCt f?/~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
~ rn E.
1-
....... II
II\\~~' .~. ';1;;1
U tJ Q; r~::ll::..; U J ......:J' J
BOARD OF SUPERV1SOt:tS
17, 1992
22901
E: .
OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - section 10.3.1
Tax Map 105, Parcel 11; Property of Bear Island Timberlands
Mr. Ray:
,he County Attorney and I have reviewed the documentation of
ecords you have submitted for the above-noted property. It is the
ounty Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination,
.hat this property consisted of two (2) separate parcels on the
ate of adoption of the Zoning Ordinance (December 10, 1980): One
'arcel on the east side of Route 729 and the other on the west side
'f Route 729.
ach of these lawfully separate parcels is entitled to associated
evelopment rights. This determination results in one (1)
dditional parcel than is shown with a parcel number on the 1980
ounty tax maps. (Subsequent to 1980, a "subdivision plat" was
pproved in 1988).
I
I
his determination considered the Sanford v. Albemarle county Board
f Zoning Appeals case. In both cases, fee-simple right-of-way
I. . .
edlcatlon to the state for a hlghway, serves to divide the
'roperty. In this case, the dedication of right-of-way for Route
29 was recorded in July, 1968, prior to the adoption of the Zoning
'rdinance.
I
he most recent deed of record as of the date of adoption of the
'oning Ordinance is found in Deed Book 446, Page 402. It is dated
ply, 1968 from continental Can Co., Inc. to State of virginia.
his deed created the following parcels:
1) (New parcel 11A) of 2.835 acres on the west side of
Route 729. Conveyed to Randy and Pamela Thomas on
March 6, 1989 (DB 1038, Pg. 575). One (1) development
right.
I "~
. .". ---\.
pril 17, 1992
oger Ray
~age 2
2) (still parcel 11) of 462.335 acres on the east side of
Route 729. Property of Bear Island Timberlands. Five (5)
development rights.
'1Yl.~
M. Patterson
Administrator
Jan sprinkle
Gay Carver
Lettie Neher, Clerk to the Board of supervisors
Bear Island Timberlands
Randy and Pamela Thomas
Reading Files
(1) additional parcel
(1) by Tax Map, two (2) by determination
)
--- \.:
Distributed to Board. $':J~9:L
Agenda Item No, _~. t)50(;(s,/~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
COf(f" "i
rrT~ ~ .!
I il \~ ,J.~ ~""
U U L.:J C':/i~
.;lARLt:.
-.:J ~
.., )I~
-L~IU
24, 1992
BOARD Of SU ?E:r::J: 3011S;
I
I
eonard and
Cobham Park
ci:obham, VA
I
E: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION
I
: Tax Map 66, Parcel 28;
I
I
ear Mr. Ray:
I
Sylvia Milgraum
Farm
22929
OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - section 10.3.1
Property of the Milgraums
'he County Attorney and I have reviewed the documentation of
lecords you have submitted for the above-noted property. It is the
'ounty Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination,
'hat this property consisted of two (2) separate parcels on the
ate of adoption of the Zoning Ordinance (December 10, 1980): One
'arcel on the north side of Route 22 and the other on the south
'ide of Route 22. The property, "Cobham Park Farm" totalled 692.50
I
cres.
I
ach of these lawfully separate parcels is entitled to associated
evelopment rights. This determination results in one (1)
'dditional parcel than is shown with a parcel number on the 1980
'ounty tax maps. (Subsequent to 1980, a "subdivision plat" was
'pproved in 1991 creating a 9.6 acre lot on the south side of Route
, 2. )
i
his determination considered the Sanford v. Albemarle County Board
:f Zoning Appeals case. In both cases, fee-simple right-of-way
,edication to the state for a highway, serves to divide the
roperty. In this case, the dedication of right-of-way for Route
'2 was recorded in Deed Book 212, Page 278 in 1931, prior to the
doption of the Zoning Ordinance.
I
he most recent deed of record prior to the date of adoption of the
oning Ordinance is found in Deed Book 660, Page 271. It is dated
ovember, 1978 from Peter, Jr. and National Bank and Trust to
~eonard and Sylvia Milgraum. This property consists pf the
ollowing parcels:
i
I
I
I
,
I
......,. "
~
,pril 24, 1992
eonard and sylvia Milgraum
age 2
1) One parcel on the north side of Route 22, consisting of
ndetermined acreage. This contains five (5) development rights.
) The other parcel consisting of the large majority of the acreage
(692.50 acres total). This now consists of a 9.617 acre lot with
development rights, and the residue with 3 development rights.
I
nyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
hir~y' (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have any
'uestions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
I
incerely,
I
I
P/st
I
Jan sprinkle
Gay Carver
~ettie Neher, Clerk to the Board of supervisors
Richard W. Schuette
Reading File
OTE:
I
ne (1) additional parcel
ne (1) by Tax Map, Two (2) by determination
DistribUlf:'j tJ c.ill.:ill.!, ..5. -( :-? ;)-
Agenda Item No. tJ;;. 'OS{)~/Id
-. =,\ C~O\U~~.:J1YOFA~~~~AR~L~C:
i$ . ~ D 1 .. \.~
..f.t~~ \
- --- ~PR 271~
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA r~L;-: ~ U;:Ju. .
BOARD ()~. SUPERVISO~S
TDO: (804) 786-1934
Telephone (804) 786-3143
FAX: (804) 225-4261
Hugh C. Miller, Director
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond. Virginia 23219
D vid P. Bowerman, Chairman
A : emarle County Board of Supervisors
4 1 McIntire Road
C arlottesville, V A 22901
Castlebrook, Albemarle County, 02-656
Mr. Bowerman:
A its April 21 meeting the State Review Board considered the eligibility of the above-referenced
pr 'perty for inclusion in the National Register and the Virginia Landmarks Register. The board
co 'curred with the Department staff's opinion that this property does not individually meet the
el"gibility requirements for listing. This decision was reached after careful consideration of the
in ormation submitted and application of the National Register criteria.
I
T is is not to say that the property should not be preserved. The staff is required to consider
pr 'perties on a comparative basis statewide; on that basis they could not say that this property
sh uld be singled out from among similar structures of its period in Virginia. Should you wish
to 'submit additional information in the future, the staff will be happy to re-evaluate this
pr perty's eligibility.
I
T e information submitted has been placed in the permanent archives of the Department of
H"storic Resources, thereby contributing to our knowledge of Virginia's historic resources. Please
~ I free to contact me if you have any questions about this decision.
I
Si ,cerely,
~
J a 'es Christian Hill
N tional Register Assistant
-.
.,.:oa:~,.
~\l......-",.,
&" Lt.... - .
~l .-.~, .'
. '\-Jt; J
~ .~1 .'"
\~~:~,t:'.:.;:s, "=',t:
~'\.#,~jI ~~/",'
.,~~.. -rr~~/
~...,.~
Distributed to B03rd: S - ( - ~ 0-
Agenda{ Item No. !3d, - tJ5oCJf' rj)
. Wi '"\'
,----
"
..
..
C,OlVIMONvVEALTJhl of VIRGINIA'
21 ".,
-~JJ
~ ..'sDits
,
Huoh C. Mille. oirec,or
Department of Historic Resources
221 GO\'ernor Street
Richmond. Virginia 23219
TOO: (804) 786-1934
Telephone (804) 786-3143
FAX: (804) 225-4261
22902
: Enniscorthy, Albemarle County (DHR File No. 02-28)
I
I
On behalf of the Commonwealth, it gives me great pleasure to inform you that the
s te Board of Historic Resources has placed Enniscorthy on the Virginia Landmarks Register
an has endorsed its being nominated to the National Register of Historic Places. We will be
fo arding the nomination to the National Park Service following final review by Department
s ff.
The Virginia Landmarks Register was established by an act of the General Assembly
in 1966 and includes "the buildings, structures, and sites which are of statewide or national
si nificance." It is our judgment that Enniscorthy richly deserves this official recognition as
on of the Commonwealth's historic resources.
The National Register of Historic Places is maintained by the National Park Service
of the Department of the Interior. I am hopeful that the Keeper of the National Register will
ap rove our nomination and place Enniscorthy on this official list of the nation's historic
pI es.
The protection of registered Virginia landmarks is of immediate concern to this office.
It i our hope that you will let us know if we can be of any assistance in the preservation of
thi 'property. Many times our staff can offer advice to owners who contemplate alterations
or en ovations of their properties, and we welcome the opportunity to serve.
i {. fh")L
. Miller
~
J W. K. Properties, Inc.
-- c 9 Curry Roberts
: Enniscorthy, Albemarle County
pril 24, 1992
P 'ge 2
David P. Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Phil Gramm, Chairman
Albemarle County Planning Commission
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Planning Director
Nancy K. O'Brien, Executive Director
Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
Melinda Frierson, Consultant
The Honorable Edgar S. Robb
Member, The Senate of Virginia
The Honorable Mitchell Van Yahres
Member, House of Delegates of Virginia
The Honorable Peter T. Way
Member, House of Delegates of Virginia
Distributed to Doard: 6" ~/- q 2i ~-
\. Agenda Item No. q}.. . 0 5a:t1~ / V
SUSAN T, ELLIOTT
Director, Customer Relations
i
I i
ft The, rotoma~ Edison Company
.~ Part oUH!Nleg~eny Power Syste~, "
10435tD~hPviii~ F>ik~ ..,)0 .''-_, ,v , ,A)'\S
Hagerstown, MD 21740-9547
Phone: (301) 790-6170
FAX: Local 790-6089 Toll Free 1-800-782-2219
April 8, 1992
Dear Community Opinion Leader:
...
Enclosed are the Allegheny Power System (APS) and The Potomac Edison
I Company 1991 Annual Reports. Of special interest is APS President and Chief
I Executive Officer Klaus Bergman's report to stockholders presented on March 12,
I
: 1992, in New York, N.Y. He outlines the system's eventful year and, in particular, its
work toward complying with the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
Also enclosed is a brochure, "Cleaning the Air at Harrison Power Station,"
I
I which more closely examines the company's plans to install emissions cleansing
I equipment at this power station in West Virginia.
We're pleased to be able to offer this valuable information to you.
Sincerely,
k
Susan T. Elliott
.~
_' .r
Distributed fo Board: 5-( - 9;)...
Agenda Item No. 3:J. . IJ5ouff'/1)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE COUr-:T'(.J \ l I ~U:
mJJ: r~, - - I.~
." ~ h ('-" I
. 1\1 /o-~p,'? <.yJ!- J. f! I
uh--c-..:;- L.~' I~ ~ I,
...::::J I...:::..J ~_ , , _ I ~J
BOARD Of SU,:":,,":"... Q~S
MEMORANDUM
TO:
I FROM:
I DATE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
April 28, 1992
IRE:
status Report of the South Rivanna Reservoir Restoration
Project
its meeting on April 27th, the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
ceived the above referenced report from F. X. Browne, Inc. which
o tlined the current programs in place to protect the South Fork
R.vanna Reservoir. I have copied two pages from the report which
i 'dicates that, over the past decade, water quality at the South
F rk Rivanna Reservoir has not significantly changed. The data
a 'so indicates that eutrophication of the South Fork Rivanna
R servoir is proceeding very slowing, if at all, and that it is
a ,tributed to the restoration activities occurring within the
w tershed as well as the implementation of watershed management
c ntrols. These controls have been effective in reducing the
s diment loading in the reservoir.
A 'copy of the entire report is located in the County Executive's
o fice for your further review. Should you have any questions,
p ease do not hesitate to contact me.
T,Jrjdbm
9 .065
I
A tachment
STATUS REPORT OF THE
SOUTH mv A1~A RESERVOIR
RESTORA,T~ON PROJECT
April 1992
Presented to:
State Water Control Board
Richmond, Virginia
Prepared by:
F. X. Browne, Inc.
Lansdale, Pennsylvania
Albemarle-Charlottesville Office of Watershed Management
Charlottesville, Virginia
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
Charlottesville, Virginia
~
-
--
F. X. BROWNE, INC.
8.0 Water Quality
8.1 Monitoring Program
The South Rivanna Reservoir was monitored on a regular basis at three stations, The
location of these stations are shown in Figure 1, Samples were collected tVvice per month
during the growing season (approximately June - September). Dissolved oxygen and
temperature profiles were measured on each sampling date, along with Secchi disk
transparency. The water samples are analyzed for the following parameters:.
Orthophosphorus
Nitrate /Nitrite
Suspended solids
Alkalinity
Chlorophyll a
Total phosphorus
Ammonia
pH
phytoplankton
8.2 Water Quality Trends
Because the lake has been monitored annually for the past decade, the data has been
summarized for this project update by examining trends in the major water quality
parameters. The following subsections present some of the long-term water quality
trends in the South Rivanna Reservoir. In general, there have been no significant
increases or decreases in the water quality of South Rivanna Reservoir. Orthophosphorus
concentrations have increases slightly over the period. Phytoplankton density has also
increased, along with a corresponding decrease in transparency. Total phosphorus and
suspended solids concentrations, however, have been declining over the time period,
These water quality trends are presented in the following sections. Water quality data is
presented in the Appendix.
14
F. X. BROWNE, INC.
8.2.7 Trophic Status
Figure 8 presents average growing season phytoplankton densities from 1987 through
1991. As can be seen in Figure 1, there is a general trend of increasing phytoplankton
densities.
70.00
....n.____________... _.__n._n_o.n. --..............--........ ...... no_............................
..-........ ... .. -.-... .. ....-- .. .. no .. no .. .. ... .. ... .-...-........
..-....... ... .. u_.. .. n.... .. ,. ... .. '.' ., .. ... .. ... ._._o_._u___
--....--- -. .. n.__ .. ....... ,. .. ... .. .., .. ,. '" .. no -.............
----- m .. --- .. -.-... ., .. no ., ... .. .. .- .. ,.. ...---..........
.----- ... .. .._0- .. 0..... .. .. ... .. ... ., .. ... .. ... -...............
76 82 83 84 85 86 87 89 90 91
Yoor
60.00
~ 50.00
"tJ
E
..! 40.00
o
iil
.':!. 30.00
].
~ 20.00
10.00
0.00
Figure 8. Carlson's Trophic State Index trends in South Rivanna Reservoir. Hollow bar:
total phosphorus TSI; Crosshatched bar: transparency TSI.
8.3 Discussion
The general trends in water quality over the past decade show that the eutrophication of
South Rivanna Reservoir is proceeding very slowly, if at all. These trends also indicate
that restoration activities are having a positive effect on reservoir water quality by reducing
the rate of eutrophication and extending the life of the basin. Reductions in suspended
solids, in particular, indicate that watershed controls are succeeding in reducing the
sediment load to the reservoir.
20
""-.
i
Distributed to Board: ~-I- 7.?-
Agenda Item No. q~ ,P5"Cf~i2t2J
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
._ I \
J"\ \
, - .\ \ \ \
"\.\ ". - :;-1 c..ill)
U L::11....:::J~Ju ~
_ ...,... "t I "'~P\HSOqs
b !t'\f\U V' ~~ -
MEMORANDUM
I
IFROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
of supervisors ;OJ
,.--
County Executive I
~
,
,TO:
Albemarle County Board
DATE:
April 28, 1992
,
RE: 1990 Recycling Rates - Rivanna Solid Waste Authority
all of you know, the current recycling mandates in Virginia
quire that localities must recycle at least 10% of its waste
~eam by 1991, 15% by 1993, and 25% by the end of 1995. The
tached table provides you with the 1991 recycling rates for
bemarle and Charlottesville as compiled by the Rivanna Solid
ste Authority. Currently, the County and City, along with the
WA's programs and the University of Virginia's programs, are
cycling 18.6% of the area's eligible waste stream. with this
cycling rate, you can see that we are well ahead of the mandates
t forth by the State.
I is my opinion that when we refine our reporting and data
c llection for business and industry recycling, we should be able
t I meet or perhaps exceed the 25% mandate required by the State for
1 195. Should you have any questions concerning this table, please
d not hesitate to contact me.
I
.c_.....
"
I
===============================================================
RIVANNA SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY: 1991 known total recycling
amounts for City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County
===============================================================
Item:
Tons:
Aluminum
Other ferrous metals
Other non-ferrous metals
Newspapers
Cardboard
( 1)
:---------------------------------------------------------------
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1 )
( 1 )
Office paper
,
pther papers (mixed)
Mixed #1 and #2 plastics
Other plastics
Glass bottles and jars
I
I
Used oil
I
Cloth
Arboreal materials
'Tires
Concrete/inerts
( 1 )
Batteries
Sludge (composted)
Other
I
( 1)
Total recycled ("A")
Total solid waste disposed at Ivy Landfill:
Percentage of total recycled in 1991:
~aste subject to recycling mandate ("B")
Reported recycling rate 1991 (A/A+B):
( 2 )
63
5,990
589
1,485
600
222
126
27
4
1,167
119
627
1,655
212
150
5
2,724
47
15,811
131,848
10.7%
69,041
18.6%
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
:(1) Primarily diverted from landfill
(2) As defined by Virginia Department of Waste Management
(equals solid waste from households, plus recyclables from
businesses, whether recycled or not)
===============================================================
1991 RECYCLING RATES - RIVANNA SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY - 4/7/92
===============================================================
Program:
Tons:
===============================================================
Charlottesville:
City pilot curbside
( 1 )
( 1 )
ARS program
Leaf collection
1,000
Business recycling
( 1)
( 1)
White goods pick-up
Subtotal
2,561
Albemarle:
Crozet program
( 1 )
( 1 )
( 1)
1,258
Pilot curbside program
Business recycling
Subtotal
1,288
---------------------------------------------------------------
RSWA programs:
--------------
Recycling centers ( 1 ) 2,318
Landfill recycling ( 1 ) 258
HHW collection ( 1 ) 1
RWSA compost 2,724
Subtotal 5,301
---------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER:
UVA Programs
( 1)
Scrap operations
6,175
Subtotal
6,660
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total ("A")
15,811
------
------
Waste subject to recycling mandate ("B"):
(2 )
69,041
1991 recycling rate (100 x A/A+B)
18.6%
-----
-----
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Primarily diverted from landfill
(2) As defined by Virginia Department of Waste Management
(equals solid waste from households, plus recyclables from
businesses, whether recycled or not)
,
, -
182
355
970
53
26
4
485
~_/ '-..
Distributed to Bo"rd: 0-1-9 <r
Agenda Item No. q;:),. 050& 7i:'},;t)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTYO~ALaEMARLe
~.O...." W=.,~~..r~2JJ!~~
n \ MAY 1 1992
:J\\\"t' ~... ,r- .
'U .... Jt.::3
".:<(11, ~.t'1I ('I,r':._~?'E~\."~O~
MEMORANDUM
ITO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ~ --
-
~
FROM: Robert w. Tucker, Jr. , County Executive I
'DATE: April 30, 1992
I Sheriff's Request For Bailiff
IRE:
a follow up to the Sheriff's request for an additional Bailiff
serve in the Juvenile and Domestic Court, Mr. st. John and I met
th Messrs. Hendrix (City Manager) and Gouldman (City Attorney) on
ril 16, 1992 to discuss this matter. After our discussions, Mr.
ndrix and Mr. Gouldman both agreed that they would reconsider
oviding city funding of an additional Bailiff position.
bsequent to that meeting, on April 17, 1992, representatives from
e County and City met with Judge Shannon to discuss this matter
so. Again, at that meeting, City representatives indicated that
ey would reconsider this matter to provide necessary funding for
e Bailiff.
I
S ,ould you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
h sitate to contact me.
T,Jr/bat
.088
Hugh C. Miller,
irector
I
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINCOUNTY OF ALBEMARlf:
Department oj Historic Resources TOD' (804) 786 ~oo
221 Governor Street MlW . T!te~S<%} (804) 6 43
Richmond, Virginia 23219 _, FAX (804) 225. 2q1
(9)(SO U ~I
BOARD Of SUPERV1SOqs
Distributed to Board: ..5 -(- '7,).-
Agenda Item No, qJ.. {Jc;aA ( S: 13)
/
..- ,
I
A ril 29, 1992
ederick R. Bowie, Chairman
bemarle County Board of supervisors
'1 McIntire Road
arlottesville, VA 22901
ar Mr. Bowie:
e intent of this letter is to notify you of a recent
,termination of eligibility for listing on the National Register
I Historic Places that our office has made for an archaeological
:te located in Albemarle County. The determination was made
rsuant to the Department of Historic Resources' review of the
oposed improvements to u.s. 29 sponsored by the virginia
partment of Transportation (VDOT).
I
o r evaluation consisted of reviewing documentation prepared by
c nsultants working for the VDOT. It has been determined that
a chaeological site 44AB348 is not eligible for listing on the
N 'tional Register of Historic Places due to its compromised
i tegrity and low research potential.
,
I
W' would be glad to answer any questions you may have regarding
or evaluations or the review process.
Preservation Officer
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., Albemarle County Executive
Keith Rittenhouse, Albemarle County Planning commission
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Albemarle County Planning Director
Nancy K. o'Brien, Thomas Jefferson PDC
Melinda Frierson, Albemarle County Historical society
II&.
Distributed to Board: S"'/ -12
111A~8~l\:!te~lI?v~' ~~~tt5--ZV
Suite 1540
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
410-659-7500
..0 .'
">~. :~ ;.';.~/\:""~: L. ~~::~rr/;(~t~,S. !;...,(~.
I
ApIiil 29, 1992
I
I
I
I
I ,
Mr. Bob Rlchardson
S vran Bank, N.A.
P st Office Box 26904
R'chmond, Virginia 23261
I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
~~ rrn
~k:I: 1992 [ill
BOARD OF SUPERV1SOqS
R
Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.)
D
Hr. Richardson:
I
E closed please find the Bond Program Report and Monthly Report
P rsuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions for the month
I
o I March 1992.
I I you have any questions, please do not hesi tate to contact me
a : 410-659-7500.
I
S ncerely,
I
I
hm
I
e 'closures
~Ms._LeL.E ieNe~h.e'L:}
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
<'" -. . -
80NO PROGRAM REPORT
Monlh March Y Nr ..l..2.21
Property: I rbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) Project .: 051-35371
lOC.lion: (harlottesville, VA Number of Unit. 66
SubmlUed t y: Loretta Wyatt April 6 , 1992 Effective 3/31/92
Ma/'\.l~r D.Te
I Total Occupied 66
I Bond Occupied 14
I. LOwtA INCOMf
I
The 101l0w I~g units hl~ been designated as "lower Income" unlls
I
1 A bor Crest Dr. Eleanor Blair I
2t 41 et, I
t
2 4 A bor Crest Dr. n Margaret Q. Sandford42 62.
5 Alrbor Crest Dr. 23 Fannie G. Tisdale 43 63,
3
6 Alrbor Crest Dr. 24 George C. Barnett, Si.4 &4,
4
5 9 Afrbor Crest Dr. 25 Virginia Burton 45 65,
6 12 P libor Crest Dr. 26 G. Robert Stone 46 M.
7 . 15P rbor Crest Dr. 21 Jane Wood 47. e7,
e 20 P rbor Crest Dr. 28 Evelyn Mandeville 48 68.
9 24 P rbor Crest Dr. 29 Gertrude Breen 49 69,
10 78 1 rbor Crest Dr. 30 Ernest M. Nease ~ 70,
\1 84 I tbor Crest Dr. 3t Juanita Boliel{ 51 71.
12. 90 I hor Crest Dr. 32 Florence Wheeler 52 72.
13 94 rbor Crest Dr. JJ Sarah E. Fischer 53 73.
14 106 tbor Crest Dr. J4 Katherine T. Nowlen 54 74.
15 35 55 7~.
16 J6 ~ 76.
I J :17 51. 77,
I
Its I 38 ~. 78,
I
19 39 59 78,
~'O I 40 60 80.
I
I
T t\e enan ~s Irom prevIouS report .,.lIeeted in the above hshng .f.
I
O.I.llonl Mdl1lona
I
.t H 1: ,,.
2 12 2 12,
3 13 3. 13.
I
.. 14 4. 14,
5 15 5 15.
6 I 16 6 16.
I \1 7 \7.
7 I
8 18 8. 18,.
t 19 9 11,
\0 I 20 10, 20.
.../ ",.
Effective March 31, 1992
MONTHLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 7(a) OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS
TO I ABG Associates, Inc.
300 E. Lombard street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
RE~: Hydraulic Road Apartments - Aroor Crest Apa.rt:rnents
Charlottesville, Virginia
pu~suant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions (the "Deed
Re~trictions"), as defined in an Indenture of Trust dated as of
Aplril 1, 1983, between the Industrial Development Authority of
Alpemarle County, Virginia (the "Authority"), and your bank, as
tr~stee, the undersigned author ized representative of
Richmond-Albemarle Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited
Partnership (the "Purchaser"), hereby certifies with respect to
the operation and management of Hydraulic Road Apartments,
Charlottesville, Virginia (the "Project"), that as of the date
shown below:
I
1) The number of units in the Project occupied by
lower income tenants is 14. .
2) The number of units in the Project unoccupied and
held available for Lower Income Tenants is -0-
.
3) The number of units rented and the number of units
held available for rental other than as described in
(1) and (2) is 52
4) The percentage that the number of units described in
(1) and (2) hereof constitute of the total number of
units in the Project is 21%
5) The information contained in this report is true,
accurate and correct as of the date hereof.
6) As of the date hereof, the Purchaser is not in
default under any covenant or agreement contained
in the Deed Restrictions or in an Agreement of Sale
dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Authority and
the Purchaser.
I~ WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Report as of
April 6, 1992
RICHMOND-ALBEMARLE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia
limited partnership
'v - ~fd' -
By: c?)~<.O-,(.:::~> jY//..??a_G.G..
Authorized Representative
Distributed to Board: ::;-~ / ' q 2-
Agenda Item No. q~. tI.5 t(, .3 /f
Edward H. Sai . Jr.
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
ScottsviJle
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 R' AND U M
F
Board of Supervisors
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk,
CMCf
May 1, 1992
S
Reading List for May 6, 1992
J ne 12, 1991 - pages 24 - 46 - Mr. Perkins
~p~ A.7 - 67 Hr. Bowel..JlId.ll
pages 68 - end - Mr. Bain
~a.-4
S ptember 18, 1991 - pages 1 - 21 (#8) - Mr. Bain
pages 21 (#8) - end - Mrs. Humphris
N vember 6, 1991 - P;:)CJ'~S 1 - 11 (#9) Ml.. BowermanPo.a....f ()
pages 11 (# 9) - elld Mr. PeL k..i.n~~~..~
L :ec
~~U'_/ II
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y.
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
May?, 1992
. Dan S. Roosevelt
'ident Engineer
I artment of Transportation
I
I Box 2013
arlottesville, VA 22902
I
! At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on May 6, 1992, the following
ac ions were taken:
I Agenda Item No. 5.1. Letter dated April 13, 1992, from Gerald G. Utz,
Co tract Administrator, Virginia Department of Transportation, requesting
ap 'roval of a resolution to add and abandon certain sections of Route 660 due
to recent reconstruction of that road and the bridge over the South Fork
Ri 'anna River. ADOPTED th(~ attached resolution.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matters: Discussion: Route 682.
I REQUESTED that the Highway Department move forward on the Route
68 /787 gravel road project in accordance with the Board's adopted policy on
aved roads, recognizing that there is not sufficient right-of-way dedicated
this project, but, also, recognizing that there is a clearly demonstrable
ger to public safety which necessitates the use of funds to purchase right-
of way for the project. The Board also requested that the Highway Depart-
me I t move forward on the Route 610 gravel road project with the same under-
st ding.
I DIRECTED staff to draft a letter to the Commonwealth Transportation
Bo rd and the Culpeper District Engineer asking the Highway Department to
co sider Board concerns about State requirements for improvement of gravel
ro ds, the 40 foot right-of-way requirement and design standards for secon-
da y roads, taking into consideration aesthetics, safety and environmental
co cerns.
Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt
May 7, 1992
Page 2.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Other Highway Matters.
Mr. Bain requested information on the status of the traffic signal study
on the intersection of Route 250 West, Route 809 and Old Ivy Road.
Mr. Bowerman asked the Highway Department to put additional signage on
Clarke Lane in Carrsbrook, near the vertical curve, to warn motorists of a
hidden driveway around the curve.
V ery truly yours,
#~
Lettie E. Nehe , Clerk, CMC
LEN: ec
A ttachmen t
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Robert B. Brandenburger
April 29, 1992
'. ',,c
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLe;
;lj:~jC\1S~ ~UfiTl
~~.'~ APR 3~. 1992 '. .
I' .
i ft.- ~~-'i....;~ '.
. ,.
EXECUTIVE OfflGf4
'-. ~4.
.
...
<<....... .-:
,
R .bert L. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
C unty of Albemarle
C :unty Office Building
4 1 Mcintire Road
I
C arlottesville, VA 22901
RE: State Route 682, Project: 0682-002-P33, N-501
You are requested, at your meeting on 6 May, to again support the paving of
R ute 682. This road is the only access to the homes of approximately 100 families.
It also provides the most expeditious access to these, and 400 additional homes for
the Crozet Fire and Rescue Services.
This project will replace the current gravel road, two-way traffic with frequent
~ lane widths, blind turns and elevations, and a 55 mph speed limit, with a paved
b lane road having a 25 mph speed limit. As currently defined and approved, it will
e tend from Route 250 to 1.70 miles south of Route 787, a distance of 2.50 miles.
This project has been in the approved Six Year Secondary Road Plan since
1 88. Originally budgeted at $1,050,000, changes in planned location made by the
Vi ginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) have caused an increase to
$ ,250,000. The last local approval is dated 1 April 1992, with the signing of the
ro d budget plan by Mr. Tucker. (See Enclosure #1 )
I
This project is urgently required because of the unsafe conditions affecting daily
v l1icle transit and emergency vehicle response time. At the meeting on 10 November
1 87, of the Planning Commission, Chairman Richard Cogan stated that "Route 682
is probably the worst road in the county". Nothing has changed since then. On a
c r;nparison of traffic accidents, Route 682 is approximately 6 times as dangerous as
R ute 29N. (See Enclosure #2)
(
,
I
The first donation of right-of-way (ROW) was made for Route 682 on 6 April
1 p4. Over the next many years, numerous additional donations followed. All of
th se were made relative to the existing location of the road, and on the assumption
th t a 50' ROW was required. At this time, only 4 parcels have not donated the ROW
'uired by VDOT. In each of these, a 45' ROW is available against a 50'
re uirement. It is anticipated that at least 3, if not all, of these will donate in the
im ediate future. (See Enclosure #3)
R bert L. Tucker, Jr.
A ril 27, 1992
P ge Two
The Board adopted its current policy for unpaved roads on 6 April 1988. It
u derstandably anticipated that these roads would be improved in their existing
10 ation. VDOT changed the plan recently which now anticipates additional ROW
d nation outside the road's current alignment. Such a requirement is clearly an
i position on the affected landowners. I am aware of no instances in which
a ditional ROW donations have been required because of alignment changes. In fact,
in 1988 ROW was purchased from a gravel road project along an existing location and
thout any history of public safety problems. The State Code specifically identifies
t e administrative and operational positions of both the Board and VDOT regarding
s condary roads. (See Enclosure #4)
In the past, gravel road projects have been approved and completed with the
e elusive justification that the ROW had been donated. (See Enclosure #5)
Additional, but subordinate to public safety considerations, inconveniences and
a gravations are experienced daily by the users of Route 682. (See Enclosure #6)
This project is enthusiastically supported by over 95 % of those who must use
ute 682 on a daily basis. They have been working for 28 years to get it approved.
It is now number 1 priority on the list of unpaved roads. It is scheduled to be
a vertised early in FY 1993. Its construction schedule and supporting budget have
b en reviewed and unconditionally approved five times. In this process, VDOT,
C Ipeper, has taken extraordinary steps to identify an approximate location which will
h ve minimum effect on the environment and still provide necessary public safety.
Please do not desert us now, when we are on the last leg. Send VDOT the
ssage that you continue to support this project.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
~~ ~
Walter F. John
Spokesman, Citizens on Route 682
B cks Elbow
R ute 1 0, Box 11 3
C arlottesville, VA 22903
ENCLOSURE #1
A MINISTRATIVE HISTORY:
1 88 Project, described as road paving and railroad crossing, recommended
a d approved, unconditionally, by the Board and Transportation Commissioner, was
in luded in the Six Year Secondary Road Plan. Budget: P. E. $20,000; R/W
$ 0,000; Const. $1,000,000; Total $1,050,000; EAD 7/92; ECD 7/93.
Project unconditionally included in updated Road plan as identified above,
b t with a budget increase to $1,250,000. (This increase, resulting from road
r location designs, was first identified in the Plans between 1988 and 1992.)
Project unconditionally included in updated Road Plan as identified above.
Project unconditionally included in updated Road Plan as identified above.
Project unconditionally included in updated Road Plan as identified above.
2 March 1992 By this memorandum, Mr. D. S. Roosevelt identified this
p oject in his "Current Projects, Construction Schedule". In enclosure dated 1 April
1 92, to this memorandum, Route 682 was listed with an advertising date (EAD) of
7 92, and the Estimated Construction Time of 6 months.
1 April 19~92 In the "Financial Plan for 6 Year Secondary Road
I provemBnts Plan for 1992 - 93 through 1997 - 98", signed by Mr. Bob Tucker, to
b submitted to the Commissioner, Route 682 was identified as projects 682-002-P
N 01, RR Crossing, Lights & Gates, P. E. $5,000; Const. $95,000; Total $100,000;
E D 7/92; ECD 10/93; and 682-002-P33, N501, Paving 2.5 miles, P. E. $80,000,
R W $20,000, Const. $1,050,000; Total $1, 150,000;EAD 7/92; ECD 10/93.
ENCLOSURE #2
P blic Saft~ty
The users of Route 682 are primarily interested in the paving of the road in
o der to (1) increase highway safety and (2) reduce emergency vehicle response time.
L tters testifying to the unsafe conditions have been received from (a) Postmaster,
( ) Fire Chief, (c) Public School Transportation, (d) Department of Inspections, (e)
P lice, and (f) former Ivy Exxon Owner. (Copies of these and some pictures are
e closed.)
Because of the dangerous railroad crossing, county school buses are not
al owed to use intersection of Route 682 with Tour 250. They must enter from Route
7 7 or from Route 637 and then "U"turn back at the crossing.
Because of the weight limitation of 8 tons for the railroad crossing bridge on
ut 708, Route 682 is the primary and most expedient route for emergency vehicles
m CrOztH to some 500 homes. These are included in the area contained within
ute 7787, Route 708 (and along the section south of the bridge), Route 637 and
R ute 682. A few years ago, Dr. Campa's home caught fire (57-44B). Because of
t e road condition, no heavy fire equipment could get to the site. Fortuitously, Dr.
C mpa was able to extinguish the fire himself.
BasHd on "accidents per vehicle-mile per month", Route 682 is at lease 5.9
es as dangerous as Route 29N (between Hydraulic and Rio Roads). Six accidents,
ADV count of 291, and a 16 month period was evaluated for Route 682; 537
cidents, an ADV count of 50,000, and a 36 month period for Route 29N.
1. 0,/ :;:~::::,,I C/ .1 7
,J lJI-..!I\l I.. ODD
F' F~ E~ El I E: 1\1''1'
JEFFEFElON COUNTRY FIRE AND RESCUE ASSOCIATION
DE:r.~F~ I~ F~. 1'..IODl)
RECENTLY MYSELF AND SEVERAL MEMBERS OF CROZET VOL. FIRE DEPT.
TOOK ~ RIDE OVER RT.68~ SOUTH OF RT.250 WEST. WE FOUND THE ROAD
CONDllIDNS TO BE EX1'REMELY POOR. THERE WAS A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT
OF WA~H BOARDING OCCURRING. THE WASH BOARDING WAS SO BAD THAT IT
COULD VERY EASILY CAUSE A VEHICLE TO 80UNCE RIGHT OUT OF THE
ROADWAY. THE DITCHES WERE ALSO FOUND "0 BE EXTREMELY DEEP IN
QUITE A FEW PLACES. IF A VEHICLE, WHETHER IT BE SMALL DR AS
LARGE AS OUR APPARATUS~ WERE UNFORTUNATE TO SLIDE OVER INTO ONE
OF lHESE DITCHES, IT WOULD SUSTAIN A CONEl!DERABLE AMOUNT OF
DAMAGE. OUR MAJOR CONCERN HOWEVER WOULD BE IF WE WERE ANSWERING
SCll"II::UN :::' ~:: C(..K,I.... F'OF~ HELP 'T'I.H !;;) \1.JUUU) CAU!::')E m..JCI..1 {..~ DE:LAY IN ot.m
f~E~3POI\1 :3E: THAT {.) C I T I ZI::N CDUI...D LDO~3E "!'I'IF~ I I:~ L. I F:E. WHEI\l F~ESF'DND II\JCI
TO A FIRE SECONDS COUNT AND WITH A DELAY OF THIS NATURE A FIRE
COULD 3D FROM BEING A VERY SMALL ONE TO CONSIDERABLY L.ARGER DOING
THOUSA~DS OF DOLLARS DAMAGE. IF THIS SITUATION WERE TO HAPPEN IT
WOULD 3E A HORRIFYING EXPERIENCE FOR 80TH THE CITIZENS AND THE
MEMBER~ OF OUR DEPARTMENT.
I ~AVE IN THE PAST REQUESTED THAT THE ROAD CONDITIONS 8E
MOVED JP ON VDOT'S OF ROAD IMPROVEMENT LIST. DUE TO THE
SERIOU3NESS OF THE ROAD CONDITIONS ON RT.b82 I WOULD LIKE YOU AS
PRESID:NT OF OUR ORGANIZATION TO SEND A LETTER TO THE COUNTY TO
SEE IF THEY WILL SPEED UP THE PROGRESS ON THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
IN THI3 AREA. I WOULD APPRECIATE ANYTHING THAT YOU COULD DO.
f\;:;('ECTf:'UL.L Y ~I
J~
Pf:':E~3TOI\1 GEI\I'Tf:;:Y
A!;;~:3 J ~;; T ('.~I\IT CH I EF
CRoZET VOL. FIRE DEPT.)
JEFFERSON COUNTRY FIRE FIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION
.,.
203 RIDGE STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901
Mr. Richard Huff
Deputy County Executive
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va 22901-4596
November 18, 1991 7
Dear Rick;
Several deficiencies and roads and bridges have been
identified within the County that can and are creating problems
ith the emergency response of fire/rescue vehicles. I would ask
hat the roads/bridges listed below be placed as a very high
riority with the County for repair or replacement. This list was
upplied by the member agencies of JCFRA.
One block of Peyton Drive between Commonwealth Dr. and
Greenbrier Dr.
Railroad bridge located on Free State Rd.
Rt. 682 ~very poor condition)
Bridge over Mooreman's River located on Rt. 671
Railroad Bridge on Rt. 616
ohn L. Hood
resident, JCFRA
c Mr. Walter Johnson
"Serving Charlottesville - Albemarle Since 1972"
, (
....;~.
John G.
Secretary
I
I
I
illiken
I
T ra nsportatlon
I
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Office of the Governor
Richmond 23219
(804) 786-8032
TOO (804) 786-7765
November 26, 1991
.....
I
I
I
Mr. Walter F. Johnson
~ucks Elbow
Route 10, Box 113
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Dear Mr. Johnson:
I
I
Thank you for your recent letter regarding transportation
policies. I appreciate your thoughts on several of the issues
which are under consideration as a part of a transportation
policy review. You mentioned two other issues on which I wanted
to respond.
I
I
I The purpose of the Administrative Process Act (APA) is to
review proposed regulations of state government that have
statewide effect. Provisions of the APA have been followed for
approval of many current rules and regulations established by the
irginia Department of Transportation. As other older
regulations are revised, they will also be subject to the APA.
I
I
You also asked about emergency response times. While
ighway safety and emergency vehicle response times are not
equired by statute to be considered in selecting secondary
ystem projects, there is a process through which the Department
'f Motor Vehicles provides accident information to the Department
'f Transportation. This information is provided to resident
ngineers to be considered in establishing each county's priority
:ist of secondary improvements.
I
I
I Each resident engineer has available a considerable amount
f other information that must be considered in preparing a
riority list for review by the respective Board of Supervisors.
,nclosed is a diagram of the process through which secondary road
,ix-Year Plans are revised. Please note in the diagram that
onsideration of police, fire, rescue and accident information is
'n essential part of the process. The resident engineer's
:udgment on priorities is then subject to review by the local
oard of Supervisors and the public. Safety and response times
~st be considered by all parties throughout this process, but
hese may not always be the overriding priorities in a county.
I '
...
, L
<)
Development of a Secondary Road SIX-YEAR PLAN
CITIZENS' REQUESTS
eowners, Clubs, Churches, Builders,
Farmers, Developers, Others
I
...
,J.
1
I I
I I
1<1
I I
I
BOARD I I
OF ~>I
SUPERVISORS I I
I
VDOT
RESIDENT
ENGINEER
I
,J,.
plan
Zon
Pol
Fi
Res
Scho
Par
Econ
Tou
:ing
ng
ce
e
ue
Is
s
mic
,ism
DRAFT PRIORITY
LIST OF
IMPROVEMENTS
I
J-
J-
2 . I
WORK SESSION
WITH BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS
I
J-
,J.
3 .
I REVISED DRAFT
CITIZENS <I LIST OF
IMPROVEMENTS
I
J-
J-
4 . I I I
BOARD OF
comments> I SUPERVISORS' 1<
citizen PUBLIC HEARING I
I I
J-
5.
ADOPTION OF
SIX-YEAR PLAN
1.
J-
,
Notes:
, 1.
FEDERAL
& STATE
AGENCIES
I
,J.
I
OTHER
VDOT.
STAFF
Funding
Accidents
Standards
Maintenance
Bridges
IVDOT DISTRICTI'
> & SECONDARY
ROADS I
VDOT Comments
A. Board Approval
B. Board Signature
C. VDOT Signature
Commissioner is the last and final arbitrator on
Six-Year Plans.
Annual Budget is prepared using plan priorities.
Six-Year plan must be revised every two years.
2.
3 .
reference: ~33.1-7C.Ol, Code of Virginia
I
I
I
3/7/89
-.At ..;.
Mr. Walter F. Johnson
November 26, 1991
Page Two
I hope this information is helpful to you. I appreciate
your interest in our transportatfo system.
Mr. Ray D. Pethtel
."
sin erely,
.~ ; j ! / /.1/1/.Jr~
I ohn ~tI~1 1ken
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
1155 SEMINOLE TRAIL
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22906
February 2, 1988 1
Mr. W.F. Johnson
Rt. 12 Box 113
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Johnson:
We appreciate the opportunity to address the problem encountered by the
Postal Service in the delivery of mail on some of our narrow, hilly
and rough roads that do not have an all weather surface. The particular
road that you addressed (Route 682p, was the indirect cause of a roll
over accident several years ago by one of our rural carrier jeeps. This
road, several times a year, between the railroad and Route 250 W, deter-
iorates to a wash board effect that makes it difficult to control the
direction of a vehicle going down the hill. This is where the jeep
bounced around in the road, turned sideways, and rolled over on the down
hill portion of the road.
Thursday, January 7, 1988, the condition of the road, in addition to the snow,
made travel along 682, in the opinion of the rural carrier, unsafe; therefore,
portions of the road did not receive mail delivery that day.
We feel that a hard surface of tar and gravel would enhance the safety of
travel along this road, even if a widening project cannot be done at this
time, and hope this will be addressed at any future meetings with the
county supervisors or highway officials.
We regret any inconvenience you may have suffered because of non-delivery,
but the safety of our carriers take precedent when travel condition and/or
road conditions may be hazardous.
If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Sincerely,
/UA&uL.
Neal' PerKlns
SC Manager/Postmaster
Charlottesville, VA 22906-9998
cc: SC Director, Customer Services
Supt., Delivery and Collection
LMR:pwg
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS~
Department of Transportation
2045 Lambs Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-8979
804-973-5716
I U,1.'l...ij-~,,-,
Mr Lauronce Johnson
Bu ks Elbow, Rt. 12,
Ch rlottesville, VA
J
February 8, 1988
Box 113
22901
De r Mr. Johnson:
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversations, regarding the
co ditions of State Route 682. Jpresently we have three school buses which
ar I routed along this road; two travel the entire length, and one travels
fr m Route 250 to Route 787.
,
The school buses have experienced problems during the school year on
road due to its condition: narrow width, particularly at curves; 1
k of adequate shoulder space; wash-board sections where there is inadequate
inage. As I informed you, during severe weather conditions, this road is
from service, and parents are requested to bring their children to either
intersection with Route 787 or Route 637. Our drivers have also worked
h the parents and other residents of'this road, so that their bus schedules
I
: known, inorder to try and help to reduce traffic during the school bus
s. Clearly, improvements to this road would help reduce some of our
nsportation problems.
I
I
I
, As I stated to you, our office has discussed these problems with the local
of ice of the Department of Transportation, and they are aware of the situation.
We Injoy an excellent working relationship with V.D.O.T., as they have been
ext emely helpful in responding to emergency needs. There are several roads in
Alb marle County which are in need of improvement, which our buses travel on
I
a d ily basis. Route 682 falls into this category.
I
,
, Our office has submitted a list of requested road improvements, for
inc usion in the County's Six-Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan, to Mr. John
Hor e of the County Planning Department. We discussed Route 682, and it was
inc ,uded, along with several other secondary roads.
, I appreciate your efforts in attempting to improve 'the condition of State
Rou 'e 682, as this will also improve our operations. If our office can be of
any further help, or if you require additional information on this matter,
pIe se do not hesitate to contact me.
I
,
cc: David Papenfuse
... ..}- .-
"".-~~
'-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Qepartment of Inspections I
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5832
February 11, 1988 )
his letter is in response to your request of opinion on condition
f state maintained roads in the Crozet area, particularly state
oute 682."
I
; drove over state Route 682 on February 9, 1988, when weather
'onditions were clear and temperatures were in the 40 degree
ange, and found the road condition to be satisfactory. Emergency
~hicles will be able to pass through this route on days when
lmilar conditions exist. Unfortunately, weather conditions do
ot always stipulate when an emergency will occur.
i ,
I
~ate Route 682 is a very narrow and crooked road, with vari9us
levation changes, which would hender emergency vehicle access
nder extreme weather conditions. Snow, ice, and heavy rains.wi~l
ake areas on this road unaccessabl~. You, and other residents
esiding on this route, should be made aware of this.
I
ut, the problem with this particular road is not the only state
Qute where accessibility by emergency vehicles is apparent.
Several roads in Albemarle County have similar problems that
s ould be corrected.
I
r. W. F. Johnson
I
Bucks Elbow
It. 12, Box 113
harlottesville, VA 22901
Road Improvements
Mr. Johnson:
R presentatives from the Jefferson Country Fire Fighters
A sociation, P. O. Box 6014, Charlottesville, VA 22906, have also
b en vociferous on road conditions in our county and I recommend
y u contacting them' for their support.
I
~ r'
.
'"
If you should have any questions about this letter, please call.
Sincerely,
!&!(;,:4.j:-j
obert W~:~kins
I. '.
lre Preventlon Offlcer 1
c: Robert W. Tucker, Deputy County Executive
Preston Gentry, Chief - Crozet Vol. Fire Dept.
Ted Armentrout, President - J.C.F.F.A.
Reading File
File
. I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Police Department J
County Office Building
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-2112
FRANK . JOHNSTONE
CHIEF
NATALIE A. BUCHNESS
VICTIM/WITNESS COORDINATOR
1'1(\1":(:/'1
.,:~ .~.I I
'1 ':)::::C:
M~. WALTER F. JOHNSON
E: )(:/<:::::: EL..E:CJl.,j
F~i' 1:2, BC)X i'l:3
C~ARLOT1'ESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
.
D~AR MR. JOHNSON,
I am responding to you reference the information on
1:) '. '.. t, I.I.} ';::' I,'.. 1'1 l.,.!. ::::; . H. '/ :::: '/ <;\ n d t.1''', c' .I: '''- I::', /1. b l' :i. (::/ ,::.) \,.:'..' 'y' () 1..04 ,,,. ':', k ,'2 d f 0 )'
t. i '1 i':t t. T 1(1 i';'. ')/ 1"'1.'.:' \/ I.'.;! l' C' I] .:;\ r. d :i. n ,;] t.1"1 ('.' t.. I'" .:~ v t? J I~) n '1..1"', i,,;; j"' () .:;\ d ~\J h f.' n
~,} '. '.' <:<. t.. hi.;::: )' :i. n t. I"', C;.;.' '..': :i. n t. (:.. l' J.. i. 1'1', ':".' .
Several years ago while answering a fire calr on this road with the
C:: j" ()Z'.;.:' t. Vo.i. 1....11'1 t.e't.;:' r f:: i. )" '.;.';.' [) (;.:.' P.:;I. )" t.lfI,;.:' n t.., ~;;;I.?V'.:! \" ,:::\ 1 () 'I' t.h~::.' rl,emb,?l'~':; vl?h i c I \,~~:; 1.'J,:;",l' '.'2
'~.~r:~.\~: I:J~::'::~:~')I~.;I.-I(jn:;:;::~f~ 'I' ~"'I~J::C;':2;~':;; ~.,.):.: J ::;::~~.~.;;~:.c;~ ll~:f:' I{.~~U~~~\:~. 0;; c ,;~;:::: ;.~ ;:~ e i~:r'I~:.~: s h~(;~ L;:~:~ m7~:'o;~;~~
01 the line of travel, Several of the members responding to the call
h,".d t.i"'I\,.:,.i.l' pc~r":;oniC:;1 vehicl,:.::" c\"o'::'-,:::;!J.ii')'7<:.; of t.hl:;.. )"o,:)d ,jUt? t....::. t.h\::. iCt;.~. The
tire equiptment was able t.o get. in and out without damage, but. several
of the members vehicles skidded into other members vehicles causing
ccnsiderabJe damaqe.
~,)
In t.r"l'2 pi::\~:; t ~:.r;2v'e r' c.i J ,/t:2,,::. j"'~:; I eel r-I )" e ri'IC' Ii'I b 1:2 r' E, f t.e r. ,;::'.11 t.he 0 tl"II::~ r' l'Oc!l::lS;
ir the area were passable we have had several school buses that have
been involved in incidents on this roa~ due to t.he northern exposure
t. j'j <::. t. c: .;::.. LI <::; e' ~::; :i. c: ;.:::.' 'i,:.o '1' '.,:'In .,) i n J 01"'''.:] ,;:1. f t e )" i 1:.. h ':1 ::; rrP.:=::' 1 t.,=.o (j ".:.' 1 :-3 e ....k, ,,;;.. )' (?' ,
This past winter we had a report of a schoolbus that. was stuck in
the ditch on this road. This did not cause any damage to the bus but
d :i. j C .:)L1Si t;~ s',()rrl~;;" c: on c: t:' (. n f () r. tl"IE.' S;i.:;'. f f.;" -1... ~/ Ji'( it..".s t. r. a \/t::.. J. .
In answering calls on this road in t.he colder months I find that
ic~ stays on the surface of this road for a long time and in many
p13ces the road is too narrow' for two moving vehicles to pass safely.
It is my opion that this road because of the inc'rease in travel needs
t () I::) I.;.;! .i. frlp 'j' () \,",.'::..>::1 .
1 hope this information will be useful to you and the other
reiidents in getting the I'epairs and upgrading that. you are interested
\! . :::; . H. t:;::::::~: I
info i' 1"(,<:;. t. i CH1
'JJe I"', i':l VE;.. h'::ld bcJ.l::l
In
:~; :i. rl c e 1-' e :I y .
,.e.4 7JtaJ;:;J
F;~ . E:. j"1{1F~~T J i'J
C/l'ldi" . J
ENCLOSURE #3
R GHT-OF-WAY, Requirements and Status
VDOT has stated that (1) a 20' wide pavement, within a 50' ROW is needed
o Iy from Route 250 to Route 787, a distance of approximately 1 mile, and (2) an 18'
w de pavement, within a 40' ROW is acceptable from the balance of the road.
At the time of this writing, a donated 50' ROW is available between Route 250
a d Route 787, except for the following 4 parcels, where only 45' is currently
ntified:
(1) 57-81 R. A. Leiby - Mr. Leiby's home stands 18' from the top of
a 12' high bank, the top of which is only 5' from the existing road. His well is only
8 from the top of this bank. Any movement towards this home is not practical.
A though not completely usable because of this condition, a total ROW os 45' (both
si es of the center line) exists here now.
(2) 57-53A(1) D. W. Noonan - This property has an approximate 250' road
fr ntage. An existing 20' ROW extends from the road center line (45' total, both
si es). An additional 5' is required to meet the 50' figure. The Noonans reside in
FI rida. She has again indicated, within the past two weeks, that they will probably
d nate the additional 5'.
(3) 57-53A S. DeAlba - This property has an approximate 550' road
ntage. As with 57-53A(1), a 20' ROW exists now (45' total). Ms. DeAlba has
ice written that she will support the road improvements, if all other land owners
ve done so.
(4) 57-52B C. R. Tremblay - This property has an approximate 500'
d frontage. As with the above, a 20' ROW exists now on this side (45' total).
OT has reported that Mrs. Tremblay is willing to donate the additional 5'.
It is understood that VDOT, Culpeper, has sent the appropriate documentation
to (2), (3), and (4) above.
Beyond Route 787, at lease the required 40' ROW is available. Again, this is
re ative to the existing location of the road.
..
ENCLOSURE #4
BARD POLICY AND STATE CODE PROVISIONS
On 6 April 1988, the Board modified its Policy for Unpaved Roads. This
in ludes a condition that "the Board will not approve the paving of any unpaved road
in the Rural Areas District unless all of the right-of-way had been dedicated in advance
o there is a clear, demonstrable danger to public safety which would necessitate the
u e of State Secondary Road Funds to acquire the right-of-way". This' was an
a plification of its previous policy.
Historically, in Albemarle County, these gravel roads have been located on level
rrain, and paved in their existing location. Seldom, if ever, has one of these gravel
r ads been located in a rolling terrain as is Route 682 and require spot relocation.
T us past donations of ROW along the existing location have been sufficient to satisfy
t is policy. In accord with previous experience, the donated ROW for Route 682 is
id ntified relative to its existing location.
In 1988, here in Albemarle, ROW was purchased at a cost of $9,000 from
u cooperative land owners (Route 682, Unpaved Road Project 0652-002-214,C501).
N history of traffic safety problems was identified to support this purchase.
Should such a spot purchase be required along Route 682, it will (1) not be a
fi st in Albemarle County, and (2) it will be justified by public safety considerations.
VDOT is planning to spot relocate parts of Route 682 for reasons of public
s fety. Sections 33.1-269(5), (7) provide total authority to the Commonwealth
T ansportation Board to relocate the road and acquire land. Section 33.1-70.01
id ntifies the authority of the Board of Supervisors, limiting it to the joint preparation
o a six-year plan;, subject to the acceptance by the Commissioner. Section 33.1-69
e eludes all other authority by the Board of Supervisors when it says". . . shall have
n ... jurisdiction. . . over. . . the secondary system of state highways".
~
ENCLOSURE #5
H STORY I UNPAVED ROAD POLICY
During the period that the project to improve public safety on Route 682 has
b en pending, the following projects have been accepted and completed:
(1) Route 777 - paved in 1989 at a cost of $395,000. Located in north-east
p rt of Albemarle County, access only from Orange County; 1.55 miles long; dead
e d at base of Southwest Mountains; clear route with a couple of gentle curves;
p sses through relative open farm land with a minor elevation or two. In 1989, Route
7 7 had a total of 10 mailboxes and one very small country church located on it. One
2 March 1992, it had a total of 13 mailboxes and the church. The church is located
a few feet from the Orange County line. There was and is no obvious growth
p tential. The latest known traffic count was 82 ADV, taken in 1986. The police
d partment has no record of any accidents on this road.
(2) Route 662 - pave in 1990 at a cost of $367,000. Located north-west
Route 660; 0.85 miles long. Traffic count, 79ADV in 1988, and 76 ADV in 1990.
e police department as no record of any accidents on this road.
..
ENCLOSURE #6
A DITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
In addition to public safety, the condition of Route 682 has other untenable
e fects.
Because of the rolling terrain, applied gravel rapidly disperses and a rough dirt
r ad remains. Grading will generally become ineffective within three days. The rough
c ndition has a negative effect on people and equipment as well as vehicle control.
In one documented case, because of its rough surface, a pregnant resident was
w rned not to ride on it by her attending physician. The useful life of tires and shocks
is reduced to approximately half normal expectancy.
The dust generated is uncontrollable. During very dry periods, VDOT will spot
s read salt. This is partially effective for as much as four hours. This dust penetrates
v hicles and homes located down wind. Efforts to' control it are only partially
e eetive at best. Respiratory problems result as well as damage to furniture and
v hieles. Just last week I look my automobile to the shop with a nonfunctioning
w ndow. After determining the problem the repairman asked me directly if I lived on
a irt road. The dust had penetrated with window mechanism and caused failure.
~"-"f ..
.Ii<
~'r'l ;j! ~
--;;; c!.L.-r I/'(_J s - t - '1..,1..
Bellair Owners Association, Inc.
P. o. Box 2057
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 979-1400
March 3, 1992
. Thomas F. Farley, District Administrator
ulpeper District, Virginia Department of Transportion
.0. Box 671
ulpeper, VA 22701
RE: Intersection of Route 250 West, Route 809, and Old
Ivy Road, Albemarle County, Virginia
ear Mr. Farley:
The Board of Directors of Bellair Owners Association, Inc.,
n behalf of the Association, and all of the residents of the
ellair neighborhood whose names are signed to the attached
heets, hereby strongly petition the Department of Transportation
o install a suitable traffic signal system at the above
'ntersection. We respectfully request that you make this
etition available to members of the Transportation Commission.
I
As you know, the traffic signal system which you installed
n Route 250 West at the entrance to Farmington is working very
ell. You have also installed a traffic signal system at the
ther intersection of Route 250 West and Old Ivy Road which is
ast of the above described intersection.
Although we have found that the median improvements which
ere constructed at the Bellair entrance have provided some
rotection to motorists, the subject intersection remains
xtremely dangerous.
intersection is located in a 45 mph speed zone, which
regularly exceeded by many drivers; the traffic volume
250 West continues to increase; and these factors,
ombined with the complexity of the intersection, at which is
ocated a very popular convenience store/gas station with two
ntranceways, have caused the intersection to become increasingly
nsafe. There have been some serious accidents at this
ntersection and many of us have experienced frightening "near
isses" in the recent past.
~.~ .
Mr. Thomas F. Farley, District Administrator
March 3, 1992
Page 2
I
In addition to the 100 plus residences of Bellair and
Liberty Hill, for whom this intersection is the only route for
all of our trips, this unsafe intersection impacts several
businesses located on the north side of Route 250 between the
oute 29 Bypass and the Farmington signal light. Every time we
drive to and from our homes, we are exposed to serious danger at
his intersection.
Please give this petition your most serious attention.
embers of our Board and neighborhood would be happy to meet with
ou at the site or at your office at your convenience to discuss
he situation further. You may contact us at the above address.
We thank you in advance for your consideration of this
etition. We wait to hear from you.
Sincerely,
J;f;~g~
J, n W. Greene, President
llair Owners Association, Inc.
c: Mr. Daniel S. Roosevelt, Charlottesville Resident
Engineer, VDOT
Mr. Gerald E. Fisher, State Secondary Roads
Engineer, VDOT
Edward H. Bain, Jr., Esquire, Member, Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors
Mr. Mitchell Van Yahres, Delegate, Virginia General Assembly
Mr. Edward Robb, Senator, Virginia General Assembly
George F. Allen, Esquire, United States Congress
I FUEL COMPANY
POST OFFICE BOX 1607 · CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA 22902
PHONE (804) 293-6157 · FAX NO. (804) 293-3701
9, 1992
M I. Thomas F. Farley, District Administrator
C lpeper District, Department of Transportation
P '0. Box 671
Cl 'lpeper, VA 22701
ar Mr. Farley:
I
: Vice President of Tiger Fuel Company, I am writing to support
e BELLAIR OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. 's request for a traffic signal
stern near the entrance to the Bellair sub-division. This system,
! properly designed, could offer much safer traffic flow in and
ound this congested intersection. We at Tiger Fuel Company,
~rate a very popular service station/food shop across from the
trance to Bellair. If your office decides to proceed with this
oject, Tiger Fuel would very much like to become involved in the
sign of the traffic flow patterns affected by such a system. I
ust that you understand the economic consequences that an
suitable traffic system could have for the business that we are
'ing to develop.
1
you for your consideration.
@ recycled paper
'"
-'. "t~~.
'. i
KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY
INTERNA TIONAL MEMORIAL HEADQUARTERS
P.O. BOX 5066
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22905
(804) 295-3193
March 10, 1992
Mr, Thomas F, Farley
District Administrator
Culpeper District
Virginia Department of Transportation
Culpeper, VA 22701
Dear Mr. Farley,
The Kappa Sigma Fraternity Headquarters is located on Highway 250
West across from the Birdwood Golf Course, As the executive director
of Kappa Sigma Fraternity I have recently been made aware of an effort
on behalf of the board of directors of Bellair Owners Association, Inc.
to have a traffic signal installed on Route 250 West at the
intersection of Route 250 West, Route 809 and Old Ivy Road in Albemarle
County, Virginia. On behalf of the Kappa Sigma International Memorial
Headquarters, I would like to support this request.
The Kappa Sigma International Memorial Headquarters currently has
33 employees who come to our property Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a,m. - 5:00 p.m. We also have several hundred visitors
each week from the community who come to our property for the purpose
of using our Leadership Training Center. Various philanthropic and
community service oriented groups use our meeting hall. Needless to
say, our property receives a great deal of traffic from Highway 250
West.
I have become increasingly concerned about the traffic on Highway
250 West specifically as it revolves around the intersection in
question. The recent business additions at that intersection, and
merging traffic, have made the intersection extremely dangerous, I am
also concerned with the safety of my employees and our visitors who use
our facilities as they try to enter or exit our property, At 5:00 p,m.
in particular it becomes extremely difficult to enter either 250 West
or 250 East.
It is my op1n10n that a traffic signal placed at the intersection
of Route 250 West, Route 809, and Old Ivy Road would help alleviate
this problem.
Mr. Thomas F, Farley
March 10, 1992
Page 2
I would ask that you please accept the petition that I am
submitting with this letter for consideration for the traffic signal
system to be installed. I would ask that this be given spp-cial
consideration and your most serious attention.
Should you have questions concerning this matter, I will be happy
to meet with you and your associates,
Sincerely,
/]%1J;5,b.~
Mitchell B. Wilson
Executive Director
MBW:ksm
enclosure
cc: Daniel S, Roosevelt, Charlottesville Resident Engineer, VDOT
Gerald E. Fisher, State Secondary Roads Engineer, VDOT
Edward H. Bain, Jr., Esquire, Member, Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors
Mitchell VanYahres, Delegate, Virginia General Assembly
Edward Robb, Senator, Virginia General Assembly
George F. Ellen, Esquire, United States Congress
""
-
We the undersigned residents of the Bellair Neighborhood fully support the
letter of John W. Greene, President, Bellair Owners Association, Inc., to Mr.
Thomas . ~arley, District Administrator, VDOT, dated March 3, 1992, to which
this sig ature page is attached.
SIGNATURE OF RESIDENT
C~
~
/]/~7
L--C-I' &-.
, . (" .
.1 I, U' r ,-; - .",,1'"
I ~ '.. '.' I..' I I It....._ V _
(~.
/.
P u/?-';ti..,___
RESIDENCE ADDRESS
d~~
/ / Lf7MfJ! h1",~ - t/,i/~ ..l~ 03
/f1.U/IVr::.iY
..r: ;( ,52'W f-tJ. iJ t<l .,t.' (.. (,
MO,~
;?a ~ oXSUf,
"",~'
.;;2 2-)- (I
~, ~;;'9o
"'1'(' r-(y- ,,,;-:--,:(,(1(-,
)1., (1(' . i /'.{ I \1';-/1. I IJ .. vel
;:;. "J[.......~(~.:L-
,'-" /.:.
/:' /:; l--~)-L
_s- o{;' 0 c/...-, //..z.- t/ t1 .
, -
u P.o, (Jc
e,~ 'I~l'-- '~c<.,:., C 'v,.\'\.~ Vr''<(- ~;7'l .-
If
k' ,., 11 'c: ~
!)<.,,'...:>I ~...;,...)
Ii
. c)) ~ic!:l
-, .. , J II .,..
j, :'[1 c/C0 //.f
~~ 'fa" I
"., ,
i ---. \.I/~J -JUG, (;.
.2 t> '7 ~M-
~.~
~. ~O u), q.o2o<c;o~ ~' U. k U . ~'?q D5
11
IfDMONTlE
rnmrnUWrn f~C~PANY
,cute 250 West · p, O. Box 7486 . Charlottesville, Virginia 22906
I
(804) 977-8100
arch 19, 1992
r. Thomas F. Farley, District Administrator
ulpeper District, Department of Transportation
. O. Box 671
ulpeper, VA 22701
I
Mr. Farley:
I am writing this letter to express my support of the Bellair Homeowners
~sociation, Inc.'s request for a traffic signal system located at the entrance
o the Bellair Subdivision. In the interest of public safety I feel that this
equest is of utmost importance to the surrounding community.
I
I
: As a property owner and business operator adjacent to the proposed traffic
ight, I would like to request that Piedmont Tractor Company be included in the
fanning and design of any traffic system. I am sure that you are well aware
f the impact that any change in this area will have on the surrounding businesses.
t is my hope that a well conceived traffic light system will be to the benefit
f all parties involved.
Thank you very much for your interest in this request. Please do not hesitate
o contact me if I may be of any assistance.
~1-z--
Palmer, III
Ii'
GENnA ITEM NO.
GENnA ITEM NAME
Form. 3
7/25/86
UNTIL
~1VI
I
If! /113, ?Z!:J
6Cu t{ (;U!) lA tlVl
tJC/)! 2. / /91 Z
Gr/9CJ;;J-
Pial !1:>rtfa/
. "
.-. , -3
D ~TE ~ & I 119:J-
~ ,GENnA ITEM NO. (/.l. 0 5U ~, j ;,L 4-
A ~ENnA ITEM NAME I-JzUL66~ kJ26 A/J~
D ~ UNTIL 9JJf) I .' If9,)
Form. 3
7/25/86
. '.
..
(111/
~'7
~
Q)
6434 BURNT POPLAR ROAD. GREENSBORO, NC 27409. 1- 919 - 668-2791
ALLEn DiSpLAYS, Inc.
.1
COUNTy OF ALBEMARlfi:
~ls:~?J~
6D,f.-J\v C~ S~t~ir'fR\'~~~
s. Lettie E. Neher
lerk - Board of County Supervisors
ounty of Albemarle
01 McIntire Road
harlottesville, VA 22901
lease indefinitely defer the appeal of the ARB's ruling concerning
signs for Hardee's. This appeal is referred to in your
c rrespondence to me dated April 16, 1992.
ank you for your help in this matter. I will contact you in the
ar future to re-schedule or permanently cancel the appeal.
EN Dr-
rry Dunsmore
count Manager
c: John Grady - Dept. of Zoning
Marcia Joseph - Design Planner
Robert Midkiff - Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc.
d/tc8 /gJ/
"
/)'-':'-1. s/..t/9.:<..
SUBJECT
Cons ide
tipping
of Albe
Fee Discussion
AGENDA DATE:
May 6, 1992
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA
Refuse
ACTION:--X-
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF C
Messrs.
and Huff.
ATTACBMENTS. d ,~
REVIEWED BY: ~I
BACKGRO
At its eeting on April 27, 1992, the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority deferred action from
their p blic hearing regarding a proposed $40/ton tipping fee at the Ivy Landfill. This
proposa is an increase from the current tip fee of $32 per ton. Staff will be addressing
the issu ' of County subsidy of tip fees at the landfill over the next several months in order
to be ab e to provide options to the Board prior to the FY 94 budget process. At the request
of the 1 cal private haulers' association, staff has reviewed this matter over the past week
and off r the following comments for discussion.
DISCUSS ON:
As the Bard is probably already aware, the easiest and most effective way to subsidize the
Ivy Lan fill and reduce the tip fee would be for both the County and the City to provide
subsidy to the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority in order to reduce the capital expenditure of
cell cl sure at the Ivy Landfill. Mr. George Williams, Executive Director of RSWA, has
indicat d that if the City and County could provide funding for closure of those cells that
existed rior to the establishment of the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority, this would be a fair
and equ" 'able way to reduce the tip fee. This also provides a good benchmark for Rivanna to
take ov r the future opening and closure of cells that will be needed beyond the original
operati n of the landfill by the County and the City. In discussing this matter with the
City Ma ager, it is apparent that the City will not be able to provide any subsidy in'the
manner scribed above for FY 93. Therefore, the only other alternative to subsidize the tip
fee wou d be for some type of credit or subsidy paid directly to the private haulers in the
County. If implemented, our auditors - Robinson, Farmer and Cox - felt it would be wise for
us to re ister or require licensure of all haulers for accounting purposes before any subsidy
is prov'ded. Again, this is an issue that we had planned to address over the next two or
three m nths in a report to you. Some of the issues or problems that need to be resolved
prior t ,implementing any subsidy are outlined below for your consideration.
I
A.: MIXED LOADS: If the intent is to only subsidize the domestic waste fee from
r sidential customers, we must be able to accurately identify that tonnage. Many
h ulers currently deliver mixed loads that contain not only commercial waste
( partments, business and industry) but also city waste.
(1) How can the weighmaster at the landfill handle mixed loads that
private haulers bring to the landfill from both the City and the
County?
(2) Can the haulers deliver separate waste without additional
collection costs?
l-
Refuse 'lipping Fee Discussion
May 6, 1992
Page 2 cf 2
B. EQUITY:
(1) There is an equity issue between providing subsidy for only
residential refuse. Should this subsidy apply to commercial and
debris waste?
(2) There is also an equity issue of providing a subsidy for
private haulers and not individual property owners who bring refuse
to the landfill.
C ,ACCOUNTING: Is there an effective way to account for refuse and ultimate
stbsidy to the haulers and individuals who deliver their waste that does not
ir?ur costs that exceed the savings intended by the subsidy?
Staff had looked at handling a subsidy of this nature by simply asking RSWA to keep a running
account of each private hauler on a monthly basis and then crediting to that hauler the
subsidy that would be provided by the County which, in effect reduces the tip fee to the
consumel. The only allocated funding source that we currently have available to us would be
the SlOe ,000 reserve fund for solid waste to implement recycling and solid waste programs
that wo~ld be identified this summer. If this $100,000 subsidy were applied and returned to
the hau ers as a credit, staff estimates that the savings to citizens of the County using
private 'refuse collection would amount to approximately $.48 per month on an average,
assumin~ ,the savings would be passed on to the consumer. Unfortunately, administrative costs
for hancling the credit, maintaining proper accounting procedures and return of this subsidy
to the laulers could reduce the benefits of the $.48 savings per month. Currently most of
the surrounding counties are planning to be charging a $40-$45jton tip fee at their
respect'ye landfills.
I
RECOMMEIIDATION:
After rEviewing this matter for the past week, it is staff opinion that there are too many
potentiel obstacles and issues that must be addressed before a subsidy of this nature can be
implemeI ted. To expedite this process in order to meet a July 1, 1992 deadline for
implemelting a subsidy of this, nature is premature and would create problems for both the
haulers Rivanna Solid Waste Authority and the County of Albemarle. This type of study needs
further scrutiny, identification and elimination of any problems before implementation.
Further ,it is our opinion that the savings expected from the subsidy are relatively minor
when corSidering the expected offsetting administrative costs. For these reasons, staff does
not fee I it appropriate to expedite this matter and implement a subsidy at this time but
provide staff an opportunity to review this matter and make recommendation to you in late
summer plr early fall as originally planned. In addition, it is not recommended that a
differeltial fee for the County and the City be provided, i.e., maintaining a $32 fee in,the
County end the City providing a $40 fee. This would create an administrative nightmare for
RSWA as well as for private haulers because of the mixed loads that are brought to the
landfil ,by private haulers serving both the City and the county. It could be an enticement
for tho e using the landfill to tell the weighmaster that their refuse is coming from the
County lecause of the lower tip fee rate.
/dbm
92.070
~
i
,
D ~TE Lti<Aj ~ ! (7c;-z..-,
Al SENnA ITEM NO. qJJ) 30 if. 3,,~ (p
Al SENnA ITEM NAME 1'\ ( ((M k,~
D UNTIL fYl~ f~ j1C)J-
Form. 3
7/25/86
, '.
ho..
-
UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86
m~)
3-
'..- .....,_.._h___.',___~.,... ......" ,.....
.
,
~(IDITJW
Edward H, Bai . Jr.
Samuel Mille
David p, Bowe rhan
Charlottesvill I
,
,
Charlotte y, H mphris
Jack Jouett '
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R, Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Charles $, Marlin
Rivanna
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
MEMORANDUM
T
Melvin Breeden,
Director of Fit.anre
Clerk, CMC j..fYJ
Lettie E. Neher,
May 7, 1992
Board Actions of May 6, 1992
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on May 6, 1992, the Board took the
owing actions and requests for appropriations:
I a) Education - for Microcomputer Initiative.
ati n of $1000 received from the Commonwealth of
19 0-92 Microcomputer Initiative (Form #910044),
,
APPROVED the appropri-
Virginia as part of the
b) Education - Instructional Technology In-Service Grant, APPROVED
I appropriation of $4200 received from the Commonwealth of Virginia as part
,
he 1990-92 Technology Initiative (Form #910050).
I
c) Education - Title II Grant. APPROVED the appropriation of $22,620
re ~ived from the Dwight D. Eisenhower Mathematics and Science Education
Ac Title II Grant (Form #910048).
d) Education - Title II Demonstration and Exemplary Grant. APPROVED
appropriation of $16,000 received from the Title II Eisenhower Program,
,onstration and Exemplary Grant (Form #910049).
e) Education - Project Success. APPROVED the appropriation of $3000
re eived from the Ells Olsson Memorial Foundation in support of the Project
Su ~ess Program (Form #910051).
At achments (5)
cc: Roxanne White
Richard E. Huff, II
I Robert W. Paskel
Tracy Holt
,
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCJlL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910051
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVEFTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPCSE OF APPROPRIATION:
PROJECT SUCCESS
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
1230161101112100 SALARIES-TEACHER $2,790.00
1230161101210000 FICA 210.00
TOTAL
$3,000.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
I
22000~8100186030 PROJECT SUCCESS-AHS $3,000.00
TOTAL
$3,000.00
*****~******************************************************************
,
REQUE~TING COST CENTER:
APPROVALS:
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
I
DIREC~OR OF FINANCE
~~/~
7'-~a_?Z
.5-7 -,?2--
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
"
~~
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC1L YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910049
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVEFTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
PAL
PURPCSE OF APPROPRIATION:
PROCESS APPROACH LE (PAL) GRANT TITLE' II EISENHOWER PROGRAM.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~~******************************************************************
1320361101152100 SUB WAGES-TEACHER $6,800.00
1320361101210000 FICA 550.00
1320361101312500 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,000.00
1320361101600100 MATERIAL & SUPPLIES 650.00
1320361101800700 ADP EQUIPMENT 5,000.00
TOTAL
$16,000.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
23203p3000330209 TITLE II/D & E GRANT $16,000.00
TOTAL
$16,000.00
*****~******************************************************************
REQUE ~TING COST CENTER: EDUCATION
APPRO VALS : SIGNATURE DATE
DIREC II'OR OF FINANCE ~:&-- of' -;;1 d" - 'j' Z-
BOARD ,OF SUPERVISORS ~ 7-7'.1--
,
"
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC L YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910048
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
PAL
PURP
PROC
OF APPROPRIATION:
APPROACH LE (PAL) GRANT TITLE' II
1320
1320
1320
1320
1320
1320
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
61101152100 SUB WAGES-TEACHER $4,545.00
61101160300 INSTRUCTIONAL STIPENDS 2,000.00
61101210000 FICA 500.00
61101312500 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,000.00
61101600100 MATERIAL & SUPPLIES 10,350.00
61101601700 PRINTING & BINDING 225.00
TOTAL
$22,620.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2320 33000330208 TITLE II/GRANT #00291 $22,620.00
TOTAL
$22,620.00
**** *******************************************************************
I
COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
SIGNATURE
DATE
OF SUPERVISORS
,~~
~-;;i!.O_~ 2..
DIRE OF FINANCE
5- 7- f' J----
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCJlL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910050
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVEFTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPC SE OF l~PPROPRIATION:
INSTFUCTION1~L TECHNOLOGY IN-SERVICE PAYMENTS.
E XPENDI,]~URE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~******7'************************************************************
1211461101800700 ADP EQUIPMENT $4,200.00
TOTAL
$4,200.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*****~******************************************************************
22000/24000240251 INST. TECH. IN-SERVICE $4,200.00
TOTAL
$4,200.00
*****~******************************************************************
REQUE /5TING COST CENTER: EDUCATION
APPRO VALS : SIGNATURE DATE
DIREC IrOR OF FINANCE #~#~ .y - ~., -- 'i' ""2-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS /~~ s- 7-;?L-
.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910044
TYPE F APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVE ISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURP
FUND
OF l\.PPROPRIATION:
OF 90/92 MICROCOMPUTER INITIATIVE.
XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** ******,t************************************************************
1211 61101601600 DATA PROCESSING SUPPLIES $1,000.00
TOTAL
$1,000.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2200 24000240231 SOFTWARE RIGHTS PAYMENTS $1,000.00
TOTAL
$1,000.00
*******************************************************************
COST CENTER:
SCHOOLS
FINANCE
xP~G~~
~cA4
DATE
BO
OF SUPERVISORS
-1Plq l..
5-77'..d--
~...
~,...,.
.
COUNTY OF ALBflMRU,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
AgiJndJ Item No. ?a2.ost!t:.,pl.l--
MEMORANDUM
F
Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
April 6, 1992
D
Appropriation - Microcomputer Initiative
Attached is the appropriation form to cover the request from
D . Paskel dated March 25, 1992. (Copy Attached.)
BIbs
A tachments
.~
1~11...1 , . l[\r..:\li\~I_~
~
I.
ALBEMARLE COUN1Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS
I I( ~t-F - 1 ~~!92
1'\ \
Memorandum I) ,
t.>>'w/ ..;, I
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Robert W. Paskel, Division superintenden~~
Request for Appropriation
March 25, 1992
At its meeting on March 23, 1992, the School Board accepted
a $1,000.00 payment from the Commonwealth of Virginia as part of
the 1990-92 Microcomputer Initiative. The subsidy will be used
to purchase software for use in fifth grade classrooms.
It is requested the Board of Supervisors amend the
appropriation ordinance to receive and disburse these funds as
follows:
Revenue:
2-2000-24000-240231
Software Rights Payments
$1,000.00
Expenditure:
1-2114-61101-601600
I
Data processing Supplies
$1,000.00
Thank you.
/TLSH
xc: Melvin Breeden
Lettie Neher
Tracy Holt
~'.
. ,.,
Distribu'~d to e~nrj: S -/ -y~
A d ,< ~! 96.-. ~03-~(;,,:!t3-
g2n .1 I ,~;r. 100.
TO:
ALBEMARLE COUNlY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
.u II/C:L--;j r2-ul..c~ rm
r, (I APR 2 1 1qQ? I: I Ii
J U ~L~:;- '" 1- 'T-itUJ
9..QARD Of SUPERVlr RS
'-~ - "(,\lILL.
Memorandum
Robert W. Tucker, County Executive
FROM:
Robert W. Paskel, Division Superintendent
RE:
Request For Appropriation
"
DATE:
April 10, 1992
At its meeting on April 6, 1992, the School Board accepted
~he following four grants: Instructional Technology In-Service,
Title II Grant, Title II Demonstration and Exemplary Grant, and
Project Success. The attached sheets display background
information on these grants and the requested revenue and
expenditure appropriations.
It is requested the Board of Supervisors amend the
appropriation ordinance to receive and disburse those funds as
requested. If you have any questions, please contact me or Tracy
Holt. Thank you.
RWP\ctfd
Attachments
xc: Melvin Breeden
Lettie Neher
Tracy Holt
~, '~
Appropriation Of Instructional Technoloqv In-Service PaYment
Albemarle County Schools has received a $4,200.00 payment
from the Commonwealth of Virginia to be used to offset the
expenditures incurred for instructional technology staff
,development programs. The Commonwealth is reimbursing the
Division at a rate of $50 per teacher for those teachers in
grades 5 through 8 who have participated in more than five hours
of instructional technology staff development training. The
reimbursement is part of the Governor's 1990-92 Technology
Initiative. The funds will be received and disbursed as follows:
Revenue:
2-2000-24000-240251 Inst. Tech. In-service
$4,200.00
Expenditure:
1-2114-61101-800700 Automated Data Processing
Equipment
$4,200.00
Disbhu:~j b e:::-rd: .$ /-7.1-
Aganda Item th ~ ,'Sd~ '..3/~
Appropriation of Title II Grant
Albemarle County Schools has received a $22,620.00 grant
from Title II, The Dwight D. Eisenhower Mathematics and Science
Education Act. The grant will be used to develop a packet of
'math/science assessment tools at each grade level K-8 including
'evaluation/scoring guidelines. Training will also be provided
for teachers in the use and interpretation of these tools and
effective ways of communicating student assessment data to
'parents. Workshops for parents will also be conducted. The
topics will include understanding of the math/science curriculum,
,rationale and techniques for teaching higher-level thinking
skills, and the understanding of the purpose and interpretation
of authentic assessment. The funds will be received and
disbursed as follows:
Revenue:
2-3203-33000-330208 Title II/Grant #00291
$22,620.00
Expenditures:
1-3203-61101-152100 Sub Wages - Teacher
$ 4,545.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 500.00
$ 5,000.00
1-3203-61101-160300 Instructional Stipends
1-3203-61101-210000 FICA
1-3203-61101-312500 Professional Services
1-3203-61101-600100 Materials & Supplies
1-3203-61101-601700 Printing & Binding
$10,350.00
$ 225.00
$22,620.00
DistriJL"':J b E::rd: S-I- '1,)..-
_ _.Ag~iid~_ He;n No. 902.. d::.~ ~,31S'
Appropriation of Title II D & E Grant
Through the Title II Eisenhower Program, Albemarle County
,Public Schools has been awarded a $16,000.00 Demonstration and
Exemplary Grant to implement its Science Assessment Project.
This funding has been awarded above and beyond the non-
competitive project, in order that we may speed up the
implementation of a project that is expected to be a model for
Virginia as the new state assessment program unfolds. These
funds will also allow us to extend our "basic" project in the
following ways: (1) to continue longitudinal data collection and
,analysis for program evaluation purposes, (2) to include
assessment plans for the mathematics program in an overall
math/science 'plan, and (3) to use desktop publishing to prepare
professional-looking assessment instruments, reports, and
workshop materials. The funds will be received and disbursed as
follows:
Revenue:
2-3203-33000-330209 Title II/D & E Grant
$16,000.00
Expenditures:
1-3203-61101-152100 Sub Wages - Teacher
$ 6,800.00
1-3203-61101-210000 FICA
$ 550.00
$ 3,000.00
1-3203-61101-312500 Professional Services
1-3203-61101-600100 Materials & SUpplies
,
$
650.00
~-3203-61101-800700 ADP Equipment
$ 5,000.00
$16,000.00
-
"DI'strr',..".",.I 11 D~~..., ..s- /-'7..2...
U, ..:J to 1;,......,.",.
Agand.. lbn NJ. 9..;. ()...rlJ~,3/fo
Appropriation Request For proiect Success
For the last four years, Albemarle High School has sponsored
a program entitled "Project Success" designed to address the
needs of ninth grade students identified to be at-risk for
' failing or dropping out of school. Selected teachers meet at
least three times a week with students in grades 10 - 12 who were
identified as at-risk when entering the ninth grade. The
teachers meet with the students before school, during the student
activity period, during the student/teacher enrichment period,
during the teacher planning period, or after school. These
teachers function as mentors, providing a nurturing atmosphere
and tutoring services to assure that these students succeed.
The Elis Olsson Memorial Foundation has awavded Albemarle
High School $3,000.00 in support of the "Project Success"
program. The grant will be used to compensate the teachers
involved with the project for the time spent on the program above
,and beyond their contracted hours. The funds will be received
and disbursed as follows:
Revenue:
2-2000-18100-186030
Project Success - AHS
$3,000.00
Expenses:
1-2301-61101-112100
Salaries - Teacher
$2,790.00
$ 210.00
1-2301-61101-210000
FICA
$3,000.00
.___4
--
Edward H, Bai .IJr.
Samuel Miller
I
David p, Bowe man
Charlottesville I
,
Charlotte y, H .t.phris
Jack Jouelt
TO:
F
D
S
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CM~
March 7, 1992
illj ","'~~"" "'~~..'>. r'W'
{.' .",.'~ ~ "" ~!
(lolijJ l( ;
Forrest R, Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Charles 5, Martin
Rivanna
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
Capital Improvements Program Appropriation Ordinance
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on May 6, 1992, the
Bard adopted the attached Annual Appropriation Ordinance for the
C ital Improvements Program for the Year ending June 30, 1993.
I
,
,
tachment
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Richard E. Huff, II
Robert B. Brandenburger
Roxanne White
Gene Spratt
Dr. Susan McLeod
Ann Patton
Fred Kruger
Robert W. Paskel
Tracy Holt
John Miller
Jo Higgins
v. Wayne Cilimberg
Pat Mullaney
Donna Selle
~,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993
AN ORDINANCE making appropriations of sums of money for all necessary
ditures of the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM,
for he fiscal year ending June 30, 1993: to prescribe the provisos, terms,
cond'tions and provisions with respect to the items of appropriation and their
paym rtt; and to repeal all ordinances wholly in conflict with this ordinance and
all rdinances inconsistent with this ordinance to the extent of such incon-
sist
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the COUNTY OF
ALB LE, VIRGINIA:
SECTION I - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
That the following sums of money be and the same hereby are appropriated
for he purposes herein specified for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993:
PARAGRAPH ONE - ADMINISTRATION AND COURTS
or the current expenses of the function of ADMINISTRATION AND COURTS the
sum f eight hundred seventeen thousand six hundred seventy-eight dollars and no
cent ($817,678) is appropriated from the Capital Improvements Fund to be
appor'ioned as follows:
1. Regional Jail ExpansLon and Renovation $
2. County Office Building Annex/PBX Replacement
3. Charlottesville/Albemarle Health Dept Clinic Wing
4. Juvenile and Domestic Court Roof Replacement
5. County Computer Upgrade
PARAGRAPH TWO - EDUCATION
373,100
295,000
47,500
18,078
84,000
or the current expenses of the function of EDUCATION the sum of one
milli n seven hundred eighty-five thousand three hundred dollars and no cents
($1,7 5,300) is appropriated from the Capital Improvements Fund to be apportion-
ed as 'follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Flashing School Zone Signs $
Greer Elementary Walls
Underground Storage Tanks Replacement
New Middle School Facility
Broadus Wood Expansion
Stony Point - Phase II
Energy Maintenance Management Systems
Woodbrook Elementary - HVAC
Fire Alarm Replacement
Stone Robinson - Water Line Installation
Burley Middle School - Phase II
Jouett Middle School - HVAC
Henley Middle School Masonary Repair & HVAC Replacement
Burley Middle School Roof Replacement
- 1 -
28,000
58,000
87,300
447,000
460,000
25,000
82,000
250,000
110,000
50,000
75,000
24,000
64,000
25,000
PARAGRAPH THREE - FIRE, RESCUE AND PUBLIC SAFETY
..., lo- .6r
For the current expenses of the function of FIRE. RESCUE AND PUBLIC SAFETY
the sum of three hundred thirty-six thousand nine hundred dollars and no cents
($336,900) is appropriated from the Capital Improvements Fund to be apportioned
as follows:
1. Police Dept. Satelite Receiver Addition
2. Air Utility Truck Replacement
3. Volunteer Firefighters Advance Allocation Fund
PARAGRAPH FOUR - HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION
$
56,900
30.000
250,000
For the current expenses of the function of HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION the
sum of five hundred twenty-six thousand dollars and no cents ($526,000) is
appropriated from the Capital Improvements Fund to be apportioned as follows:
1. Revenue Sharing Projects
2. Barracks Road Sidewalk
3. Ivy Road Corridor Study
PARAGRAPH FIVE - LIBRARIES
$
500.000
11,000
15,000
For the current expenses of the function of LIBRARIES the sum of fifty-four
thousand six hundred dollars and no cents ($54,600) is appropriated from the
Capital Improvements Fund to be apportioned as follows:
1. Northside Branch Additional Books/Materials
PARAGRAPH SIX - PARKS AND RECREATION
$
54,600
For the current expenses of the function of PARKS AND RECREATION the sum of
one hundred forty-three thousand dollars and no cents ($143,000) is appropriated
from the Capital Improvements Fund to be apportioned as follows:
1. Albemarle High School Tennis Court Lighting $
2. Urban Area Elementary School Recreation Improvements
3. Scottsvil1e Community Center Maintenance/Replacement
4. Whitewood Road Park Improvements
SUMMARY
Total CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND appropriations for
Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1993:
To be provided as follows:
General Fund Transfer
CIP Fund Balance
Fire/Rescue Payments
Borrowed Funds (See Attachment)
Interest
Miscellaneous Revenues (City Share-Five Senses Trail)
Total CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND resources available
For fiscal year ending June 30, 1993
- 2 -
75,000
40,000
8,000
20,000
$ 3.663,478
$ 880,289
765,775
23,000
1.710.300
274,114
10.000
$ 3,663,478
..,
~.
SECTION II - STORMWATER/UTILITIES FUND
That the following sums of money be and the same hereby are appropriated
for tormwater and utility improvement purposes herein specified for the fiscal
year ending June 30, 1993:
PARAGRAPH ONE - STORMWATER/UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
or the current expenses of the function of UTILITIES/STORMWATER IMPROVE-
Ithe sum of six hundred twenty-eight thousand twenty-six dollars and no
($628;026) is appropriated from the Stormwater/Utilities Fund to be
tioned as follows:
1. County Master Drainage Plan
2. Lynchburg Road Storm Sewer Improvements
3. Windham/Jarman Gap Road Channel Improvements
4. Keene Landfill Closure
$
90,000
9,500
28,526
500,000
SUM MAR Y
otal STORMWATER/UTILITIES FUND appropriations for
iscal Year ending June 30, 1993: $ 628,026
o be provided as follows:
General Fund Transfer $ 508,026
Stormwater Fund Balance 120,000
Total STORMWATER/UTILITIES FUND resources available
For fiscal year ending June 30, 1993 $ 628,026
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS MENTIONED IN
SECTIONS I AND II IN THIS ORDINANCE FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993
RECAPITULATION
I Capital Improvements Fund
II Stormwater/Uti1ities Fund
GRAND TOTAL
$ 3,663,478
628,020
$ 4,291,504
E IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to
er to other funds from the General Fund, from time to time as monies
I available, sums equal to, but not in excess of, the appropriations made
se funds from the General Fund for the period covered by this appro-
on ordinance.
SECTION III
11 of the monies appropriated as shown by the contained items in Sections
I and II are appropriated upon the provisos, terms, conditions, and provisions
herei before set forth in connection with said terms and those set forth in this
secti n.
- 3 -
" . -.
Paragraph One
Subject to the qualifications in this ordinance contained. all appropria-
tions made out of the CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND AND THE STORMWATER/UTILITIES
FUND, are declared to be maximum, conditional and proportionate appropriations--
the purpose being to make the appropriations payable in full in the amount named
herein if necessary and then only in the event the aggregate revenues collected
and available during the fiscal year for which the appropriations are made are
sufficient to pay all of the appropriations in full. Otherwise, the said
appropriations shall be deemed to be payable in such proportion as the total sum
of all realized revenue of the respective funds is to the total amount of
revenue estimated to be available in the said fiscal year by the Board of
Supervisors.
Paragraph Two
All revenue received by any agency under the control of the Board of
Supervisors included in its estimate of revenue for the financing of the fund
budget as submitted to the Board of Supervisors may not be expended by the said
agency under the control of the Board of Supervisors without the consent of the
Board of Supervisors being first obtained. Nor may any of these agencies or
boards make expenditures which will exceed a specific item of an appropriation
or make transfers between specific items of appropriation without the consent of
the Director of Finance being first obtained.
Paragraph Three
No obligations for goods, materials. supplies. equipment or contractual
services for any purpose may be incurred by any department. bureau. agency. or
individual under the direct control of the Board of Supervisors except by
requisition to the purchasing agen~; provided. however. no requisition for
contractual services--such as communications. travel. freight. express--and
membership fees and subscriptions shall be required; and provided further that
no requisition for contractual services involving the issuance of a contract on
a competitive bid basis shall be required. but such contract shall be approved
by the head of the contracting department. bureau. agency. or individual and the
Purchasing Agent or Director of Finance. The Purchasing Agent shall be res-
ponsible for securing such competitive bids on the basis of specification
furnished by the contracting department. bureau. agency or individual.
In the event of the failure for any reason of approval herein required for
such contracts, said contract shall be awarded through appropriate action of the
Board of Supervisors.
Any obligations incurred contrary to the purchasing procedures prescribed
in the Albemarle County Purchasing Manual shall not be considered obligations of
the County and the Director of Finance shall not issue any warrants in payment
of such obligations.
Paragraph Four
Allowances out of any of the appropriations made in this ordinance by any
or all County departments. bureaus. or agencies' under the control of the Board
of Supervisors to any of their officers and employees for expense on account of
the use of such officers and employees of their personal automobiles in the
- 4 -
disc arge of their official duties shall be paid at the same rate as that
esta lished by the State of Virginia for its employees and shall be subject to
chan e from time to time to maintain like rates.
Paragraph Five
All travel expense accounts shall be submitted on forms and according to
regu at ions prescribed or approved by the Director of Finance.
Paragraph Six
All ordinances and parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of
this ordinance shall be and the same are hereby repealed.
Paragraph Seven
This ordinance shall become effective on July first, nineteen hundred and
nine r-two.
(1)
**~'(**
, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true,
corre t copy of an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Count , Virginia, at a reqular meeting held on May 6, 1992.
-~.~
~~ard of County Sup
... .--...
tf) '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:~) r.l 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p ~ r.l 0 0 r1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1
~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
H P:: I( CO CO I"- 0 \l'I N 0 0 0 ~ ~ Lll r1
0 0 0 N \l'I CO 0 N CO \l'I rl \l'I N \D N 0
Z H N N rl 0
r.l P:: 0 ..
Po Po Z rl
>< 0 ~
r.l CXl
~
0 ~ r.l N N N N N N N N N N
r.l ~ ~ C7\ C7\ C7\ N l"l C7\ C7\ rl C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\
I") C7\ C7\ C7\
~ 0 >4 >4 >4 >4 >4 >4 >4 >4 >4 >4
tf) H H H P:: ~ ' H H P:: H !3 H !3 H
Po P 0 0 Po 0 0 Po 0 0 0
I") I") I") " I( I") I") 1(' I") I") I") I") I")
r.l
0
0 ~ r.l N N 'N N N N N N N N N N N
l"l Z ~ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\ C7\
C7\ 0 0 I(
- CXl tf) 0 :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> ~ ~ :> ~ :>
N tf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C7\ H Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z
rz.
>4 0 0 I"- 0 0 0 0 I"- 0
rz. 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >4
P:: ~ t!l .. .. .. .. .. ~
0 Z CO ~ l"l l"l \l'I \l'I 0 CO Z
rz. p H l"l ~ I"- rl l"l N CO 0 0
~ 0 CO rl N \l'I rl r1 l"l 0
r.l 0 Z .. .. 0
H rz. 0 I"- rl rl rl
0 rz. rl r.l
0 ~ :r:
r.l ~
:r:
0 :r:
) tf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0
0 r.l l"l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H
~ ~ 0 C7\ 0 0 r1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l"l ~
:a - .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .
p ~ N CO CO l"- I"- 0 \l'I N 0 0 0 ~ ~ \l'I 0 tI)
~ Z Z C7\ N \l'I CO ~ \D ('II CO \l'I rl \l'I N \D N rl P:: 0
H 0 H ~ ~ N rl I"- 0 r.l
0 0 rz. >4 .. rz. r.l
Z ~ rz. rl 0
r.l r.l (I> tf) 0
Po CXl 0 P::
>< Z Po
r.l 0 0 0 0 0 0
- 0 0 0 \l'I \l'I CXl 0
r.l t!l rl 0 0 \D I"- Z
0 P:: Z .. .. rz. 0
z 0 H C7\ 0 N CO C7\ 0 CXl
~ H 0 ~ \l'I 0 \l'I Lll
P:: Z rl ~ \D r.l :I:
0 Po P (I> 0 0
tf) rz. z P::
tf) ~ rz.
H
0 rz.
0 0 0 0 0 I"- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I"- tf) H
Z 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 \l'I 0 0 0 0 0 C7\ tf) r.l
0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 \D 0 0 0 0 0 0 H tf)
CXl Z 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~
p rz. r.l CO CO ~ rl \l'I \l'I \l'I CO 0 0 C7\ C7\ \l'I CO 0 H
0 0 I") N \l'I I"- ~ l"l N C7\ 0 rl \l'I \l'I CO 0 I"- ~
~ 0 N l"l 0 N l"l rl \l'I rl ~ \D r.l
P:: .. .. .. P:: tf)
Po CO N rl l"l 00
rl HCXl
(I> P:::I:
PoH
tf) ~
~ ~
tf) Z Z 0
:.: 0 tf) r.l .~ 0 ~
Z H >4 Z ~
I( tf) tI) tI) H 0 r.l H tf)
~ Z H >4 r.l H I( 0 0 0
tf) tI) H I( H ~ tI) ~ 5: I( z z
Z H P:: 8 Po Z P:: H r.l r.l
0 t!l ~ 0 >< . r.l . r.l - Po Po E-l
~ r.l H ~ :r: r.l :r: :I: :r: t!l ~ t: ~ >< z
0 r.l 0 tI) tf) 0 Po r.l 0 Po ~ r.l H
r.l CXl :a tI) 0 t!l ~ 0 z
I") r.l . 0 8 ~ I( 0 0 rz. 0 r.l
0 0 z Z :I: Z r.l Z Z ~ . ~ tI) 8 ~;1
) P:: ~ H 0 r.l P H ~ H ~ :.: CXl ~
'~'. Po rz. N H ~ 0 0 8 I( 0 P:: ~~
r.l 0 tI) Po a1 P::
H t!l H 0 >4 P:: ~ >4 >4 Hr.l
8 P:: P:: :I: ~ >4 t!l CXl r.l ~ r.l r.l a1 ~CXl
r.l r.l Z P:: 0 ~ Z r.l H ;1 ~a1
:r: ~ 0 ~ 0 0 r.l 8 0 p Z E-l
0 Z r.l P:: ~ Z H ~ 0 r.l P 0
tf) t!l 0 Z CXl tf) r.l ~ rz. tI) I") :x: CXl ~ '"
I'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993
expen
PROG
terms,
and th
ordin
of su
ORDINANCE making appropriations of sums of money for all necessary
itures of the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993; to prescribe the provisos,
conditions and provisions with respect to the items of appropriation
ir payment; and to repeal all ordinances wholly in conflict with this
ce and all ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance to the extent
inconsistency.
ALBE
E IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the COUNTY OF
LE, VIRGINIA:.
,
SECTION I - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
at the following sums of money be and the same hereby are appropriated
for t e purposes herein specified for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993:
PARAGRAPH ONE - ADMINISTRATION AND COURTS
r the current expenses of the function of ADMINISTRATION AND COURTS
the of eight hundred seventeen thousand six hundred seventy eight dollars
and no cents ($817,678) is appropriated from the Capital Improvements Fund to
be app rtioned as follows:
1. Regional Jail Expansion and Renovation
21 County Office Building Annex/PBX Replacement
3~ Charlottesville/Albemarle Health Dept./Clinic Wing
4. Juvenile and Domestic Court Roof Replacement
5. County Computer Upgrade
$
373,100
295,000
47,500
18,078
84,000
- 1 -
~
PARAGRAPH TWO - EDUCATION
or the current expenses of the function of EDUCATION the sum of one
milli n seven hundred eighty five thousand three hundred dollars and no cents
($1,7 5,300) is appropriated from the Capital Improvements Fund to be
appor ioned as follows:
Flashing School Zone Signs
Greer Elementary Walls
Underground Storage Tanks Replacement
New Middle School Facility
Broadus Wood Expansion
Stony Point - Phase II
Energy Maintenance Management Systems
Woodbrook Elementary - HVAC
Fire Alarm Replacement
Stone Robinson - Water Line Installation
Burley Middle School Phase II
Jouett Middle School - HVAC
Henley Middle School Masonary Repair & HVAC Replace
Burley Middle School Roof Replacement
PARAGRAPH THREE - FIRE, RESCUE AND PUBLIC SAFETY
$
28,000
58,000
87,300
447,000
460,000
25,000
82,000
250,000
110,000
50,000
75,000
24,000
64,000
25,000
or the current expenses of the function of FIRE, RESCUE AND PUBLIC
SAFET the sum of three hundred thirty six thousand nine hundred dollars and
no cen's ($336,900) is appropriated from the Capital Improvements Fund to be
appor ioned as follows:
,
1. Police Dept. Satelite Receiver Addition
2. Air utility Truck Replacement
3. Volunteer Firefighters Advance Allocation Fund
PARAGRAPH FOUR - HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION
$
56,900
30,000
250,000
F r the current expenses of the function of HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION
the su of five hundred twenty six thousand dollars and no cents ($526,000)
is ap ropriated from the Capital Improvements Fund to be apportioned as
follow' :
1. Revenue Sharing Projects
2. Barracks Road Sidewalk
3. Ivy Road Corridor Study
- 2 -
$
500,000
11,000
15,000
PARAGRAPH FIVE - LIBRARIES
r the current expenses of the function of LIBRARIES the sum of fifty
ousand six hundred dollars and no cents ($54,600) is appropriated from
ital Improvements Fund to be apportioned as follows:
1. Northside Branch Additional Books/Materials
PARAGRAPH SIX - PARKS AND RECREATION
$
54,600
or the current expenses of the function of PARKS AND RECREATION the sum
hundred forty three thousand dollars and no cents ($143,000) is
iated from the Capital Improvements Fund to be apportioned as follows:
of on
appro
Albemarle High School Tennis Court Lighting
2. Urban Area Elementary School Recreation Improvements
3~ scottsville Community Center Maintenance/Replacement
4~ Whitewood Road Park Improvements
SUMMARY
APITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND appropriations for
year ending June 30, 1993:
rovided as follows:
neral Fund Transfer
IP Fund Balance
ire/Rescue Payments
B rrowed Funds (See Attachment)
I terest
iscellaneous Revenues (City Share-Five Senses Trail)
Total CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND resources available
for fiscal year ending June 30, 1993
- 3 -
$
75,000
40,000
8,000
20,000
$ 3,663,478
$ 880,289
765,775
23,000
1,710,300
274,114
10,000
$ 3,663.478
SECTION II - STORMWATER/UTILITIES FUND
1hat the following sums of money be and the same hereby are appropriated
for s ormwater and utility improvement purposes herein specified for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 1993:
PARAGRAPH ONE - STORMWATER/UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
Eor the current expenses of the function of UTILITIES/STORMWATER
IMPRO\EMENTS the sum of six hundred twenty eight thousand twenty six dollars
and no cents ($628,026) is appropriated from the Stormwater/Utilities Fund to
be aptortioned as follows:
1. County Master Drainage Plan
2. Lynchburg Road Storm Sewer Improvements
3. Windham/Jarman Gap Road Channel Improvements
4. Keene Landfill Closure
SUM MAR Y
Total STORMWATER/UTILITIES FUND appropriations for
fiscal year ending June 30, 1993: $
To be provided as follows:
G~neral Fund Transfer $
S~ormwater Fund Balance
Total STORMWATER/UTILITIES FUND resources available
for fiscal year ending June 30, 1993 $
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS MENTIONED IN
SECTIONS I AND II IN THIS ORDINANCE FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993:
RECAPITULATION
S~ction I
S~ction II
Capital Improvements Fund
Stormwater/Utilities Fund
GRAND TOTAL
- 4 -
$
90,000
9,500
28,526
500,000
628.026
508,026
120,000
628,026
$
3,663,478
628,020
$ 4.291.504
E IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized
sfer to other funds from the General Fund, from time to time as monies
available, sums equal to, but not in excess of, the appropriations
o these funds from the General Fund for the period covered by this
riation ordinance.
SECTION III
11 of 1:he monies appropriated as shown by the contained items in
ns I and II are appropriated upon the provisos, terms, conditions, and
ions hereinbefore set forth in connection with said terms and those set
in this section.
Paragraph One
ubject to the qualifications in this ordinance contained, all appro-
priat'ons made out of the CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM, are declared to be
maxim m, conditional and proportionate appropriations--the purpose being to
make he appropriations payable in full in the amount named herein if
neces ary and then only in the event the aggregate revenues collected and
avail ble during the fiscal year for which the appropriations are made are
suffi ient to pay all of the appropriations in full. Otherwise, the said
a
riati6ns shall be deemed to be a able in such ro ortion as the total
sum of all realized revenue of the respective funds is to the total amount of
e estimated to be available in the said fiscal
the Board of
Paragraph Two
Super
budge
said a
of th
agenci
appro
witho
11 reVE~nue received by any agency under the control of the Board of
isors included in its estimate of revenue for the financing of the fund
as submitted to the Board of Supervisors may not be expended by the
ency under the control of the Board of Supervisors without the consent
Board of Supervisors being first obtained. Nor may any of these
s or boards make expenditures which will exceed a specific item of an
iation or make transfers between specific items of appropriation
the consent of the Director of Finance being first obtained.
Paragraph Three
obligations for goods, materials, supplies, equipment or contractual
servic s for any purpose may be incurred by any department, bureau, agency,
or ind'vidual under the direct control of the Board of Supervisors except by
requis'tion t:o the purchasing agent; provided, however, no requisition for
contra tual services--such as communications, travel, freight, express--and
member hip fees and sUbscriptions shall be required; and provided further
- 5 -
that 0 requisition for contractual services involving the issuance of a
contr ct on a competitive bid basis shall be required, but such contract
shall e approved by the head of the contracting department, bureau, agency,
or in ividual and the Purchasing Agent or Director, of Finance. The
Purch sing Agent shall be responsible for securing such competitive bids on
the b sis of specification furnished by the contracting department, bureau,
agenc or individual.
the event of the failure for any reason of approval herein required
h cont:racts, said contract shall be awarded through appropriate
of the Board of Supervisors.
obliaations incurred contrary to the purchasina procedures pre-
Albemarle County purchasina Manual shall not be considered
of the Count
and the Director of Finance shall not issue an
ayment of such obliaations.
Paragraph Four
A
any or
Board
accoun
automo
same r
shall
lowanc:es out of any of the appropriations made in this ordinance by
all County departments, bureaus, or agencies under the control of the
f Supervisors to any of their officers and employees for expense on
of the use of such officers and employees of their personal
iles in the discharge of their official duties shall be paid at the
te as that established by the State of Virginia for its employees and
e subject to change from time to time to maintain like rates.
Paragraph Five
to
I travel expense accounts shall be submitted on forms and according
lations prescribed or approved by the Director of Finance.
Paragraph six
A I ordinances and parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions
of thi ordinance shall be and the same are hereby repealed.
Paragraph Seven
T is ordinance shall become effective on July first, nineteen hundred
and ni ety-two.
Attach ent
CIFAPP 93
- 6 -
00 -Ie 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
fil C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
D E-t fil 0 0 l"'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l"'l
E-t E-t , , , , , , , ,
H ll~ ~ CO CO t"- O III N 0 0 0 <:I' <:I' III l"'l
0 0 0 N III CO 0 N CO III rl III N \0 N 0
Z H N N rl 0
fil ~ 0 ,
ll< ll< Z rl
>< 0 ~
fil III
E-t
() E-t fil N N N N N N N N N N
fil ~ E-t O'l O'l O'l N l"'l O'l O'l rl O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l
~ ~ O'l O'l O'l
~ E-t 0 )-l )-l )-l )-l )-l )-l )-l )-l )-l )-l
00 H H H tl:: ~ H H tl:: H H H H H
ll< D D D ll< D D ll< D D D D D
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
r:.~
()
0 ~ fil N N N N N N N N N N N N N
~ Z E-t O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l O'l
0 D ~ :> :> :> :> :> :>
III tll 0 :> :> :> :> :> :> :>
~ 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
Ii.
5 0 0 t"- o 0 0 0 t"- o
0 0 <:I' 0 0 0 0 <:I'
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )-l
~ ~ t.'> E-t
Z co <:I' l"'l l"'l III III 0 co Z
D ....i l"'l <:I' t"- rl l"'l N co 0 D
E-t 0 co rl N III rl l"'l l"'l 0
~ D Z , ()
Ii. D t"- rl rl rl
r:.. rl fil
~ ::r::
E-t
::r::
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ()
0 fil l"'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H
E-t () O'l 0 0 l"'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l"'l ~
:2j - , , , , ,
E-t ~ N co co t"- t"- o III N 0 0 0 <:I' <:I' III 0 00
Z Z O'l N III co <:I' \0 N co III rl III N \0 N rl tl:: 0
D H <:I' <:I' N rl t"- o fil
0 Ii, )-l , Ii. fil
~ Ii. rl ()
1i1 ~ 00 0
m 0 tl::
Z ll<
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 III III III 0
t.'> rl 0 0 \0 t"- Z
tl:: Z Ii. 0
0 t-f O'l 0 N co O'l 0 III
H 0 <:I' III 0 III III
tl:: Z rl <:I' \0 fil ~
ll< D ~ () 0
Ii, Z tl::
~ Ii.
D Ii.
~ 0 0 0 0 t"- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t"- oo H
0 0 0 0 <:I' 0 0 III 0 0 0 0 0 O'l 00 fil
E-t E-t 0 0 <:I' 0 0 0 0 \0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 00
Z () , , , , , E-t
D .... r:.:l co co <:I' rl III III III co 0 0 O'l O'l III co 0 H
0 0 ~ N III t"- <:I' l"'l N O'l 0 rl III III co 0 t"- E-t
~ 0 N l"'l 0 N l"'l rl III rl <:I' \0 fil
tl:: tl:: 00
ll< co N rl l"'l 0 D
rl H III
~ tl:: ~
ll< H
00 ~
E-t fil
00 Z Z tl:: 0
:.:: 0 00 fil fil D E-t
Z H )-l Z ~ E-t
~ 00 00 00 H () fil H 00
E-t Z H )-l fil H ~ () 0 0
00 00 H ~ H E-t 00 0 ~ Z Z
Z H tl:: 0 ll< Z ~ tl:: H fil fil
0 t.'> H 0 0 >< . fil . fil - ll< ll< E-t
E-t r:.:l H ~ E-t ::r:: fil ::r:: ~ ::r:: t.'> E-t )-l fil >< Z
() fil () 00 00 () ll< fil () ll< ~ tl:: tl:: fil H
fil co Z 00 0 t.'> fil D Z
~ ~ fil 0 0 E-t ~ ~ () 0 Ii. o fil
0 0 Z Z ~ Z fil 0 Z ~ ~ , ~ 00 0 ~~
tl:: E-t H 0 fil D H ~ H :.:: III ~ 0
ll< Ii. l:'l H 0 0 0 8 0 tl::
fil tl:: 0 00 ll< ~ tl::
H t.'> H D )-l tl:: E-t )-l )-l Hr:.:l
0 tl:: tl:: ~ 0 )-l t.'> co r:.:l E-t fil fil ~ E-t co
0 fil fil ~ Z tl:: 0 r:.:l Z fil H H ~ ~
::r:: fil 0 ~ 0 0 fil 0 tl:: 0 D Z tl:: E-t
() tl:: Z fil tl:: E-t Z 0 H E-t 0 fil D 0
00 t.'> D Z III 00 fil ~ Ii. 00 ~ ::r:: III E-t -Ie
, .... ...."
.,.
D!STRlBUT!::D TO BOARD Ml:MBERS
ON .s-/-9;L
COUNTY OF ALBEMARt't
~ ~
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA ITLE:
FY 92- 3 Capital
Appropr'ation
I
Improvement Program
ACTION: --X-
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT PROPOSAL RE UEST:
Request to appropriate $4,291,504 for the
FY 92-9 icaPital Improvements Program.
,
,
,
,
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
BACKGRO
For you
Capital
Capital
Safety,
Stormwa
REVIEWED BY:
White.
approval, the attached ordinance appropriates a total of $4,291,504 to the FY 92-93
Improvements Program. Of this total amount, $3,663,478 is appropriated to the
Improvement Fund for projects under Administration & Courts, Education, Public
ighways, Libraries, and Parks & Recreation; $628,020 is appropriated to the separate
er/Utilities Fund for stormwater drainage and landfill projects.
As you ay recall when the proposed CIP budget went to public hearing on April 15, 1992,
there h d been two revisions in the FY 92-93 budget since the five-year CIP plan was approved
in Dece 'er, 1991. These were the addition of $125,000 for the Joint Security Complex
additio and a reduction of $36,000 at Stone-Robinson Elementary School from substituting a
water l'ne installation project ($50,000) for the roof replacement ($86,000).
ted revenues for the FY 92-93 project year come from several major sources:
15 from the General Fund appropriation, $765,775 from the CIP fund balance, $120,000
'Stormwater fund balance and $1,710,300 in borrowed VPSA funds.
The fin
amount
date, a
date.
approva
incurre
Please
approva
1 sheet attached to the ordinance pertains to VPSA borrowed funds and shows the
b be financed in FY 92-93 for each school project, the anticipated bond issuance
'well as the projected expenditures to be incurred on each project prior to the bond
ue to recent court rulings, this information needs to be part of the appropriation
'process in order to ensure that the County can be reimbursed for project costs
,prior to the actual issuance of the bonds.
I
eel free to call me if you have questions prior to the meeting. Action required is
:of the attached appropriation ordinance and proposed school project/bond schedule.
,
92.067
''-..r''
.,.
, I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
PROPOSED FY 92-93
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
ADMINISTRATION AND COURTS
Regional Jail Expansion and Renovation
County Office Building Annex/PBX Replacement
Charlottesville/Albemarle Health Dept./Clinic Wing
Juvenile and Domestic Court Repair & Painting
County Computer Upgrade
ADMINISTRATION/COURTS TOTAL
EDUCATION
Flashing School Zone Signs
Greer Elementary Walls
Underground Storage !anks Replacement
New Middle School Facility
Broadus Wood Expansion
Stony Point - Phase II
Energy Maintenance Management Systems
Woodbrook Elementary HVAC
Fire Alarm Replacement
Stone Robinson- Water Line Installation
Burley Middle School Phase II
Jouett Middle School - HV AC
Henley Middle School Masonary Repair & HVAC Replace
Burley Middle School Roof Replacement
EDUCATION TOTAL
FIRE, RESCUE AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Dept Satelite Receiver Addition
Air Utility Truck Replacement
Volunteer Firefighters Advance Allocation Fund
FIRE/RESCUE/PUBLIC SAFETY
HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION
Revenue Sharing Road Projects
Barracks Road Sidewalk
Ivy Road Corridor Study
HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION
LIBRARIES
Northside Branch Additional Books/Materials
PARKS AND RECREATION
Albemarle High School Tennis Court Lighting
Urban Area Elementary School Recreation Improvements
Scottsville Community Center Maintenance/Replacement
Whitewood Road Park Improvements
PARKS AND RECREATION TOTAL
UTILmESlSTORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
County Master Drainage Plan
Lynchburg Road Storm Sewer Improvements
Windham/Jarman Gap Road Channel Improvements
Keene Landfill Closure
UTILmESlSTORMWATER TOTAL
TOTAL FY 92-93 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
PROPOSED REVENUES FY 92-93
General Fund Appropriation
Fire/Rescue Repayments
CIP Fund Balance
Borrowed Funds (Virgina Public School Authority Bonds)
Interest Earned
Miscellaneous Revenues
TOTAL FY 92-93 PROPOSED REVENUES
~ '---'2-t' ~d..
373,100
295.000
47,500
18,078
84,000
817,678
28,000
. 58,000
87,300
447,000
460,000
25,000
82,000
250,000
110,000
50,000
75,000
24,000
64,000
25,000
1,785,300
56,900
30,000
250,000
336,900
500,000
11,000
15,000
526,000
54,600
75,000
40,000
8,000
20,000
143,000
90,000
9,500
28,526
500.000
628,026
$4,291,504
1,388,315
23,000
738,775
1,710,300
274,114
157,000
$4,291,504
~-0~
..e t:..<./c::....
[;//
-..,' ..
~-/O -f ;;L
,-'
)-
'~
~
County of Albemarle
V
I
\
,
I
Ii
,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
f.
t" .
AGENDA ITLE:
CIP Pub ,ic Hearing
AGENDA DATE:
April 14, 1992
'ITEM NUMBER:
9/, orll..;t ?3
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Mr. Tucker and Mrs. White
Capital
to the
ATTACHMENTS: 1
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
x
REVIEWED BY:
ION: Attached for your information prior to the public hearing on the FY 92-93
Improvements Program budget is a summary of the proposed projects by major category.
The on changes from the five-year CIP plan, which you adopted in December, 1991, is an
additio 'al $125,000 for the Joint Security Complex expansion and a savings of $36,000 at
Stone obinson by substituting a water-line installation project ($50,000), for the roof
replace ent ($86,000), which is being done in the current year.
As you ay recall, the additional funding for the road revenue sharing projects and the jail
expansi n came from savings in the current year debt service, and a refund of $147,000 from
the Rou e 810 project.
Please feel free to call me if you have questions prior to the public hearing. Official
action 0 approve and appropriate funds for the FY 92-93 Capital Improvements Program will
be done ,at the May 6 meeting.
\bt
92.058
Attachm nt
...
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
PROPOSED FY 92-93
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
ADMINISTRATION AND COURTS
Regional Jail Expansion and Renovation
County Office Building Annex/PBX Replacement
Charlottesville/Albemarle Health Depl./Clinic Wing
Juvenile and Domestic Court Repair & Painting
County Computer Upgrade
ADMINISTRATION/COURTS TOTAL
EDUCATION
Flashing School Zone Signs
Greer Elementary Walls
Underground Storage Tanks Replacement
New Middle School Facility
Broadus Wood Expansion
Stony Point - Phase"
Energy Maintenance Management Systems
WOodbrook Elementary HV AC
Fire Alarm Replacement
Stone Robinson- Water Line Installation
Burley Middle School Phase"
Jouett Middle School_ HVAC
Henley Middle School Masonary Repair & HVAC Replace
Burley Middle School Roof Replacement
EDUCATION TOTAL
FIRE, RESCUE AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Dept Satelite Receiver Addition
Air Utility Truck Replacement
Volunteer Firefighters Advance Allocation Fund
FIRE/RESCUE/PUBLIC SAFETY
HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION
Revenue Sharing Road Projects
Barracks Road Sidewalk
Ivy Road Corridor Study
IGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION
ISRARIES
Northside Branch Additional BOOkS/Materials
~RKS AND RECREATION
Albemarle High School Tennis Court Lighting
Urban Area Elementary SChool Recreation Improvements
Scottsville Community Center Maintenance/Replacement
Whitewood Road Park Improvements
RKS AND RECREATION TOTAL
U ILITIESlSTORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
County Master Drainage Plan
LynChburg Road Storm Sewer Improvements
Windham/Jarman Gap Road Channel Improvements
' Keene Landfill Closure
U ILITIESlSTORMWATER TOTAL
T AL FY 92-93 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
PROPOSED REVENUES FY 92-93
General Fund Appropriation
Fire/Rescue Repayments
CIP Fund Balance
Borrowed Funds (Virgina Public School Authority Bonds)
Interest Earned
Miscellaneous Revenues
L FY 92-93 PROPOSED REVENUES
373,100
295,000
47,500
18,078
84,000
817,678
28,000
58,000
87,300
447,000
460,000
25,000
82,000
250,000
110,000
50,000
75,000
24,000
64,000
25.000
1,785,300
56,900
30,000
250.000
336,900
500,000
11,000
15,000
526,000
54,600
75.000
40,000
8,000
20,000
143,000
90.000
9,500
28,526
500.000
628,026
$4,291,504
1,388,315
23,000
738,775
1,710,300
274,114
157,000
$4,291,504
-~
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD MEMBERS
ON ")- / -9 ;)-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
It .
~~{,"
, I
I
County of Albemarle
SUBJE
reappr
cancel
Berkma
project
TITLE: Reappropriation
ter Projects
for
~
AGENDA DATilOARD OF ~L~ITEM NUMBER:
May 6, 1992 9:Z,()so&". 72.0
T PROPOSAL RE UEST:Request
riation of funding on completed or
stormwater/CIP projects to the
and Four Seasons Detention Basin
ACTION: ~
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF C
Messrs.
Ms. Jo
&
ATTACHMENTS: 1
REvrEWED BY' j2r-
Improvements to the Four Seasons Detention Basin were sheduled for 93-94.
Subsequ nt review of these basins indicate needed improvements as well as maintenance prior
to 93- 4. The attached reappropriation funds the necessary design, improvement and
mainten nce of the Four Seasons Basin from current projects that are completed, funded from
other s urces, or no longer considered necessary. This appropriation will provide the
necessa y funds to improve and adequately maintain the above basins.
RECOMME ATION: Approve the requested reappropriation
/bt
92.061
''\..---
-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
Robert Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance~
April 21, 1992
Capital Improvement - Appropriation Adjustments
Attached is the appropriation form required to accomplish the
justments to appropriations on current Capital Projects as
tailed in Jo Higgins memo dated March 30, 1992.
Please contact me if you need additional information.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARU:.
~.. r~r~rj~ jJ~."'.. 11
,.' ~t';"- ,~
~ . . .
:'~ APR 24 1992 .'
~ t : .
i\ ~;~u
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
~. LP Il~'\d-
A ENDA ITEM NO. q ;) , 0 S-o 0, 3 L ~
A ENDA ITEM NAME '/20O-J NCl.~ I ~Lf- ~I~.
D UNTIL ~ III /'1"\ d
P h /fr<
Form. 3
7/25/86
, ..
DJ\TE I\i\~ ~ ,1\\ d-
At;ENDA ITEM NO. qO. Illfl 322
A~ENDA ITEM NAME (t~od OiVLlL-
D~ UNTIL \JV0l__ :3 I I~~ d
Form.3
7/25/86
..
, "
I
i
I
,
i
i
1
D P.TE lA~~ (p
A I;ENDA ITEM NO. I 0 -9 d 0 ~ ( I, 3 Il
A t;ENDA ITEM NAME ~V\ ~C{ CZ_
D UNTIL !VlC{VI, 2 7, q'()O 0
, I yY)
(
(
W uY ILL ~SS( ~
Form. 3
7/25/86
, "
(
@@~w
Edward H, Ba . Jr.
Samuel Mill
-roUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R, Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsville
Charles $, Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte y, mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
May 7,,1992
. Jeanne Cox
erk, City Council
Box 911
arlottesville, VA 22902
Ms. Cox:
its meeting on May 6 1992, the Board of Supervisors
the attached ordinance to amend and reenact Article VII,
ction 2.42 (Vacancy; Removal from Office; Maximum Number of
rms) to allow private citizen members on the Jail Board to
rve three consecutive three-year terms. Please present this
dinance to City Council for its concurrence.
The Board also took action to reappoint Patricia L. Smith to
e Jail Board, with said term to expire on April 30, 1995,
ject to concurrence from City Council. Please notify me upon
tion by City Council on this appointment.
yours,
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
L :ec
A tachment
c Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Richard E. Huff~ II
,.
UistriJ:: _, l n:, J: .s-/-7~
AgandJ Ila;;1 f;J. 9..2.0 V(I/' 3./;
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING ARTICLE VII
(RE IONAL JAIL BOARD), SECTION 2.42 (VACANCY; REMOVAL FROM OFFICE;
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TERMS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
C
Virginia,
that Article VII, Section 2.42 of the
County Code is hereby amended and re-enacted as
f
Section 2-42. Vacancy; Removal From Office; Maximum Number
o Terms.
Members of the Board in office on March 10, 1975, shall
c ntinue in office until the effective date of their replacement
o appointment provided for in the preceding section. Vacancies
o
the Charlottesville-Albemarle Regional Jail Board shall
ereafter be filled for an unexpired term in the manner in
ich original appointments are required to be made.
continued
member from regular meetings of the Board shall,
a the discretion of the City Council and Board of Supervisors,
such member liable to immediate removal from office. No
ivate citizen member of the Board shall serve more than three
c nsecutive three year terms.
F State authority see Virginia Code Section 53.1-106.
CCUN tv or: ALBEMARLE
mrX rm
Ulih:: 251992 ll1J
BOARD OF SUPERVISOqs
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SUBJECT
The Regi
both th
necessar
citizen
more tha
or Resolution of Intent to Amend
County Code Regarding Maximum
Terms on the Regional Jail Board.
AGENDA DATE:
April 1, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
9;;?, 01()/,~ t,3
AGENDA T
Request
Albemarl
Number 0
STAFF CONTACTCS):
Messrs. Tucker and Huff
ATTACHMENTS: 1
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGRO
Article
members
:
II, Section 2.42 of the Albemarle County Code limits the terms of private citizen
n the Jail Board to not more than two consecutive three year terms.
RECOMME ATION:
Staff re ommends that the Chairman be authorized to execute the amendment to the regional
agreemen (attached) and pass a resolution of intent to amend the County Code accordingly.
92.042
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING ARTICLE VII
(R GIONAL JAIL BOARD), SECTION 2.42 (VACANCY; REMOVAL FROM OFFICE;
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TERMS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Co nty, Virginia, that Article VII, Section 2.42 of the Albemarle
Co nty Code is hereby amended and re-enacted as follows:
Section 2-42. Vacancy; Removal From Office; Ma~-~
9:E .!I'-e-FFR€.
Members of the Board in office on March 10, 1975, shall
co tinue in office until the effective date of their replacement
or appointment provided for in the preceding section. Vacancies
on the Charlottesville-Albemarle Regional Jail Board shall
th reafter be filled for an unexpired term in the manner in which
or ginal appointments are required to be made. Continued absence
of any member from regular meetings of the Board shall, at the
di cretion of the City Council and Board of Supervisors, render
su h member liable to immediate removal from office. ~-~~~
e-~ -:i-zreft-~e~-e-:fo--l:.-he--B~-~r3=-~:Mf-e-"'f!'tO':r'e--1::ha1'r-ewo--eorr~~i":1"'e""
Fo State authority see Virginia Code Section 53.1-106.
-
~LERK, BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS Distributed to Board: 5-- / --q ~
~BEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~enda It",... ll_ Cl ~ fl<IV '2;f)
. -?". .-
,. REQUEST FOR AGENDA OF .:7-b ~.2--
Agenda Item No. (Note: This number does
not change if this item is deferred to some future date.
This sheet is moved forward with all of the paperwork.)
~ /~~ - ~/ P?t:?/~
Item Name
, /
Presentor
(For County Executive's information, please note name of
person who will be making presentation to the Board.)
Request Made By
On (Date) .
INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE:
. This form is to be used when scheduling an item for a Board
of Supervisors' agenda. This form will NOT be distributed
to anyone, but is intended only for use by the Clerk in
scheduling the agenda. Please fill out one copy of this
work sheet (it may be handwritten) and return with the orig-
inal of any paperwork you wish to have forwarded to the Board..
For Clerk's Use:
;j"'"
Appointment Confirmed with (name)
On (Date)
By (Name)
Telephone? "Mail?
Materials Received with Request? (Yes) (No)
Materials Photocopied? ..
Note: On appeal of site plans or subdivision plats, be sure
to include Planning Commission minutes with paperwork.
.
Form. 2
7/29/86
MOTION:
Mr. Bain
SECOND:
Mr. Perkins
MEETING DATE: May 6, 1992
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of supervisors has
convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Albemarle County Board of
supervisors that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.
VOTE:
AYES: Messrs. Bain, Bowerman, Marshall, Martin and Perkins.
NAYS: None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE: Mrs. Humphris.
ABSENT DURING MEETING: Mrs. Humphris.
~.??
Clerk, Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
Distributed to Board: -.Ii ;' 1- q d
Agenda Item No, .!l;}. . o.i....C(jJ3:L
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
:::J
. '-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County Planning Commission
FROM:
V, Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
Community Development
and OoJG;
DATE:
May I, 1992
RE:
Joint Planning Commission/Board of Supervisors
Worksession - May 6, 1992
The Planning Commission has identified several potential topics for
discussion at the joint worksession with the Board of Supervisors. The
following may be covered within the time allotted for the worksession:
1, Capital Improvements Program - the role of the Planning Commission
in determining the means for financing the CIP, The State Code
Section 15.1-464 states, in part, "Such capital improvement program
shall include the commission's recommendation, and estimates of
cost of such facilities and the means of financing them [emphasis
added] to be undertaken in the ensuing fiscal year and in a period
not to exceed the next four years, as the basis of the capital
budget for the county, or municipality." In the past, the Planning
Commission has typically prioritized projects and reviewed cost
estimates, but has not recommended financing beyond receiving
information on the possible source(s) of funding, The specifics
for means of financing have been addressed by the County Executive.
The County Attorney's office has indicated to staff that this
historic process meets the requirements of the State Code, The
Planning Commission is asking if the Board of Supervisors wants it
to take a greater role in determining means of financing,
.:- . .J.
2, Conditions of approval - Special Use Permits. Over time, there has
been a trend towards being specific in the conditions of approval
for special use permits as regards such things as maximum number of
children in a day care facility, maximum number of students in a
private school, limits to use or activity, etc, Some of those
conditions have been related to health issues, particularly
adequacy of septic systems, The Planning Commission is asking the
Board of Supervisors what its philosophy is now regarding such
conditions, i,e. should they remain specific or, where appropriate,
simply leave the maximum numbers or activity to that which can be
supported through approval of other agencies.
3. Sign Ordinance - Removal of non-conforming signs under the amended
ordinance. On April 22, 1992, the Planning Commission unanimously
passed the following motion:
"It is recommended to the Board that provisions be included in the
Ordinance for the timely phasing out of all non-conforming signs.
If an acceptable process for this is not currently available,
appropriate implementation requirements should be identified, and
actively pursued,"
This action was out of concern for the inequity and potential
hardship that the amended ordinance may impose on new signs in
areas where signs allowed under the old provisions (and prior
variances) exist, The County Attorney's office has advised that
mechanisms for removal of non-conforming signs, such as
amortization or condemnation, are not generally enabled under the
State Code,
Commissioners have individually raised other issues for possible
discussion with the Board. One asks the Board's philosophy regarding
requirement for interconnection of streets between subdivisions, This
was a general requirement a number of years ago and rights-of-way were
reserved in subdivisions to allow such connection, However, due to
citizen concerns regarding increased traffic in neighborhoods, the
Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors have not pursued a number
of possible connections and the Board has, in fact, abandoned some
rights-of-way at the request of local residents, Another Commissioner
raises several additional discussion subjects which are attached and
self-explanatory,
The Planning Commission is interested in holding future joint meetings
with the Board, particularly with general review of the Comprehensive
Plan scheduled to begin next year, Several Commissioners have mentioned
the possibility of holding such meetings on a regular schedule. The two
bodies may want to discuss this possibility on May 6,
VWC/jcw
ATTACHMENT
cc: Phil Grimm
Amelia Patterson
i
, ,...
..,~ r'., ~.:: .~'::. t~;: "~.::.
Fh:.. \,;....1' '.., '-
APR 2 B 19~L
~ ,;..!~~IIJ:. r;"'''f,'~/'r
PI .,J",l,":l.,"'" J ,,~.,., I.
'-' ". ,. ,
f~6 April 1'3'32
Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning and
Community Development
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22'301-45'36
Dear Wayne,
The following items are respectfully submitted for your
evaluation as possible discussion subjects with the Board
during our Joint meeting.
(1) Sign ordinance: What are the Board's thoughts
concerning a manditory phased removal of nonconforming
signs? (Reference our motion of last week.) The provisions
of 15. 1-495.2.b itentifies the authority of the BZA which
can limit the effect the proposed conditions.
(2) Decisions of the Board of Zoning Appeals: It
appears apparent that some members of the Commission are
becoming more and more concerned with the decisions of the
BZA. Notwithstanding its organizational and func~ional
intent and authority, more and more variances to zoning
conditions seem to be granted. Some of the decisions by the
BZA appear to be that more recognized as associated with a
"boar~d of cn'-'bitt"c:d;iCo''''''', thCi1t with one lirf):ited to Ci1Ct CIY',
claims cyf "1-,yw'JE?cessc:n~y hardsh:ip", the burrjen clf proclf clf
lo'Jhich is the sole r~espo""fs:ibility o'F the applicant. We rnight
ask: "vJhen is ,,-\ hardship not a har~dship?" Do we need a me.re
c.'omplete de'FinitioY" of "undue har~dship" which would provide
guidance For the BZA? Does a hardship, for these
deliberations, e~i5t when all regulations and conditions
identiFied as responsible for the claim were in effect at
the time of purchase or lease by the applicant of the site?
("Sel'f-iY",flicted har'dship, whethe)~ deliberately Clr~
ignorant~y incurred, aFfords no basis for the granting of a
variance. Alleghany Engers., Inc. v. Board of Zoning
HPPf'?C:'Ils" 217 Va. EA, 225 S. E. 2Y',d 383 (1 '376) ) The Bc.ard has
he authority to challenge the decisions of the BZA through
hE' c:ircuit cour-,t. Should they consider' this actioY", if
they, too, are concerned with these rulings?
(3) Ze,ning Changes. l,.Jill 'the Boa'rd ident:ify their
logic and considerations which let them to approve a
permanent change in the complete zone, in the case of the
kxpansion at Piney Mountain? They may recall that the
Ceoomission recommended that (1) support be pledged to the
appl i CiH"t, (2) necessary change iI", zOl",i ng be made UPOI",
application by, and acceptable firm identification of
operational characterists of the company involved, and (3)
any change in zoning would be limited to Just that required
by the subject in question.
I (4) Changes to regulations and new plans are
bontinually being developed. Each of these may, or may not,
have an effect on the cost of local governmEnt. This cost
is a major concern of the entire community. Should t~e
Board direct that (1) a review be made to identify
acceptable changes local procedure and/or regulations which
would redUCE the cost of government, and (2) all new studies
and proposed plans include a cost effect analysis.
Warmest personal regards.
S i l",ce"r~Pr-l y,
w~~'"
--
,
Bucks E 1 bc.w
Rt 1 (> Box 11:3
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
I
. .-" ,
Y OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Office of the Mayor
, Box 911 . Charlottesville, Virginia. 22902
Telephone 804-971-3113
May 22, 1992
Ms. patricia L. Smith
100 Boulder Spring Court
Charlottesville, Va. 22901
Dear Ms. Smith:
I am pleased to inform you that at its May 18th meeting
I City Council reappointed you to serve a three-year term as
, the joint City/County representative on the Charlottesville-
Albemarle Regional Jail Board. This term will expire on
April 30, 1995.
We appreciate your continued willingness to offer your
services to the community and hope you find your next term on
the board challenging and enjoyable.
Sincerely,
a-~~)~
Alvin Edwards
Mayor
cc: Joint Security Complex
Ms. Lettie Neher
~
..
.-- .
~'1'~ OF
VOV
OFFICE OF
ALee-A1~~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
/Comrni s s i on/Commi t tee Jl ( bf In Itf (f J CA/tf' ro (IF 5 vi (& ;];,..rf :Yeu c :+1 (b," f"f~
cant's Name --==r.-tri r i ( i A L ~ /Y\') ,1--f!.
Address lOb &'!i.ld U :)f r;,,) 'b (!o<<-rf, (!AI'tt'(o1hs,;: I(f, JA d}lo~
District in which your home residence is located 7~
Address / SEE { (1) (u1trsJ b L Phone d-.1'fc)- ;)f.{L{ I
,() I I ~(),7 ~
,{),-c1. ~ K......f:S Or It'"1 ; 0 N Occupation/Title f.Lf.C.~_di'()t D'n-.dor
of Employment Lf -/~ - 'X'{) Birthdate/Place 7 &1/53.. /'11
ll/r13 6t.{ reS Ir, T'/ I .
/0 Previous Residence (i ;'/l"r(cHf.:s.~/I('<....
dYrS
Number of "Children ~
Resident of Albemarle County
e's Name Q;ry IL rtJ ,'5 ~ If. r
tion (Degrees and Graduation Dates)
Ps
I,N
/17
/0 /17(""
I -
,p /II h
~
..
''"'-
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This'Board/Commission/Committee
I~ I\1J ~ -Sa u ut -!;, r Sf )( 'f C {lr S. ()JJ :Sit; / 150m- C/. II-/s ()
Ad- (IX. (It I t.j uo {Uf. cO j IV S;r; ( ttd ( u; -{"( F'S, f)S ~~, Orl'2-
\ I I
(1 I'L or, ktflV -IMft,CST iN Cr;hl:,0;r( :::J;st,(f..
" '::> CD rY'\ IY\ U. f\.J I
The lnformation provid application will be released to the
public upon request.
,
IIU
~:~~
SIGNA URE "
s--//- 7d-
DATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County,Office Building
401 McIntire Road ,
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Phone: 296-5841
@@ljJW
David p, Bowe man
Charlottesvill
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R, Marshall, Jr,
Scottsville
Edward H, Bai . Jr.
Samuel Mille I
Charles 5, Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte y, H mphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F, Perkins
While Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:,
Melvin Breeden, Director of l~na7ce
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
May 7, 1992
Board Actions of May 6, 1992
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on May 6, 1992, the
rd APPROVED the reappropriation of $60,384.31 to fund completed
or canceled stormwater and CIP projects to the Berkmar and Four
Se sons detention basin prQjects. Attached is the signed appro-
pr'ation form. (#Form #910045)
The Board authorized the expenditure of up to $5000 from its
tingency Fund to be used to pay tip fees for cleaning up
rious dump sites around the County.
The Board also authorized the Chairman to sign the attached
resolution which authorized the Chairman to sign a Real Estate
S ies Contract and ratify an Option Agreement relative to the
c struction of an extension of Berkmar Drive north from Rio Road
t the section of Berkmar Drive fronted by the Agnor-Hurt Elemen-
t ry School. Attached are copies of all documents.
L :ec
A tachments (4)
c Roxanne White
Richard E. Huff, II
Jo Higgins
Robert B. Brandenburger
.I'
FISC L YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
91/92
NUMBER
910045
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADVE TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO X
CAPITAL/STORM
SE OF APPROPRIATION:
TMENTS TO REFLECT CURRENT STATUS, OF PROJECTS.
XPENDITURE
CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*******************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
41000950038
41000950049
41000950056
41000950064
41020950050
93010930202
1910 41033360000
1910 41033800975
1910 41042800975
1910 41047800975
1910 41034800975
,1910 41035312400
1910 41035800975
RIO ROAD SIDEWALK
GEORGETOWN ROAD PATHWAY
MEYERS DRIVE
SIDEWALK 708/631
ROUTE 678 RELOCATION
TRANSFER TO STORM WATER
($33,823.89)
(2,103.66)
(22,000.00)
(2,500.00)
(53,750.00)
87,280.93
STORM WATER FUND
SMITHFIELD ROAD-ADV
SMITHFIELD ROAD-STORM SEWER IMP
SOLOMON ROAD CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
KING GEORGE CIRCLE DRAINAGE
BERKMAR DETENTION BASIN
FOUR SEASONS BASIN-ENGINEERING
FOUR SEASONS BASIN-IMPROVEMENTS
(150.00)
(5,736.60)
(2.40)
(219.07)
4,000.00
14,389.00
75,000.00
$60,384.31
TOTAL
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** *******************************************************************
2900 51000510100 CIP-APPROPRIATED FROM F/B ($26,896.62)
2910 51000512000 STORM WATER-TRANSFER FROM CIP 87,280.93
*******************************************************************
TOTAL
$60,384.31
STING COST CENTER:
OF FINANCE
BO
'OF SUPERVISORS
ENGINEERING
SIGNATURE
DATE
;!jZ.~-
0/ -.::z/ -7....c
S~~~
,
r
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors supports the construction of
extension of Berkmar Drive north from Rio Road to the section of
kmar Drive fronted by the Agnor-Hurt Elementary School; and
WHEREAS, contracts and agreements between the County and
ious property owners are necessary to complete this project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
emarle County, Virginia, that the Chairman is authorized to sign
t Real Estate Sales Contract made on April 29, 1992, by and
between Preston o. Stallings (seller) and the County of Albemarle
( yer) and, by adoption of this resolution, to also ratify the
o tion Agreement signed by the County Engineer, Jo Higgins, made on
F ruary 25, 1992, by and between Preston o. Stallings (grantor)
a d the County of Albemarle (grantee).
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
w i ting is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Bard of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
r gular meeting held on May 6, 1992~
r:1 cih.
Clerk, Board of ounty Supervisors
, i
~ \
.
OPTION AGREEMENT
THIS OPTION AGREEMENT, made this 25th day of February, 1992,
by and between PRESTON O. STALLINGS, Grantor, and the COUNTY OF
AL EMARLE, VIRGINIA, Grantee;
WIT N E SSE T H:
For and in consideration of the sum of
$100.00 (one hundred)
to be paid by the Grantee to the Grantor on or
before
May 8,
19~, and for other good and valuable
co'sideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
and Grantee hereby agree as follows:
1.
Property Subject to Option.
Grantor hereby GIVES,
NTS and CONVEYS to the Grantees, their successors and assigns,
irrevocable and exclusive right, option and privilege
(r ferred to herein as the "Option") to purchase that real
property located in Albemarle County, Virginia, known as
,
20675.99 square feet of land, designated "Residue A"on attached
of Thomas B. Lincoln, dated January 3, 1992.
Source Deed:
Book 710, Page 182.
2. Option. The Option granted in this agreement will
for a term (the "Option Period") of
60 days
encing
April 29. 1992 and ending at 11:59 P.M. on 6/28/92
In the event the Option is exercised, the $ 100.00
pa 'd for the Option, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by
th Grantor, will be credited against the purchase price. If the
1
;f
'"
Option is not exercised, this sum shall be retained by the
Gr ntor.
3. Purchase Price. If the Option is exercised, the
pu chase price for the property will be fifteen thousand dollars
Do lars ($ 15,000 ).
4. Contingencies.
5. Grantor's Representations. In connection with the
Op ion and, if exercised, the sale and purchase contemplated
he eby, Grantor warrants and represents to Grantee:
(A) Grantor has good, marketable, insurable, fee simple
ti Ie to the Property, free and clear of any and all liens,
se urity interests, deeds of trust, mortgages, encumbrances and
ot er restrictions (whether existing of record or otherwise)
ex ept as noted in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto as a part
of this agreement;
(B) Grantor has the right, power and authority to enter
this agreement and sell the Property in accordance with the
te s and conditions hereof;
(C) Grantor has no knowledge of any condemnation
ceedings or proposed proceedings against the whole or any part
2
, "
-,
of the Property, zoning proceedings or proposed proceedings
ag inst the Property, or any litigation which would have a
ma erial effect on the Property~
(D) Except as noted in Exhibit A, Grantor has the
ex lusive right of possession of the Property and no options or
co tracts have been granted to others to purchase or to rent any
in erest in the Property or any part thereof~ and
(E) Grantor will not cause or permit any action to be
ta en which will cause any of the foregoing representations to be
rue as of the date the Option is exercised or the closing date
cified with respect to the sale and purchase of the Property
pu suant to the terms of this agreement.
6. Access to and Inspection of the Property. During the
Op ion Period, Grantee, and their representatives, agents,
ependent contractors and assignees, will have the right to
en er upon the Property at any time to conduct all studies,
t s, surveys, examina t ions and other expl ora t ions of the
Pr order to determine the suitability of the Property as
a uilding lot. Grantee hereby agrees to indemnify and hold
Gr harmless from any and all damages caused to the Property
by activities in the event the Option is not exercised. If
Gr causes a survey to be made of the Property, they will
re the surveyor to physically flag the corners of the area
su veyed.
7. Exercise of Option. Grantee, their successors and
as igns, may exercise this Option at any time during the Option
3
"
"
Pe iod by written notice mailed to or delivered personally to the
Gr ntor in conformity with paragraph 9 below, stating that the
Op ion is exercised. Upon the exercise of this Option, this
ag eement will become a valid and binding contract of sale for
th Property at the price and upon the terms, covenants and
co ditions set forth herein.
8. Closing Requirements. If the Option is exercised, the
sa e and purchase will be closed at the law office of St. John,
Bo ling & Lawrence, 416 Park Street, Charlottesville, Virginia,
at such other mutually agreeable place, not later than the
si tieth day after the exercise of the Optioni provided, however,
th t the time for closing will be extended as necessary to permit
ntor to cure any title defects in accordance with the
pr visions of this paragraph. The closing requirements will be
as follows:
(A) Title. At closing, Grantor will deliver to Grantee
a eneral warranty deed with English Covenants of Title
(t The Property will be conveyed to Grantee free and
cl ar of all liens and encumbrances, claims, easements, rights of
wa , leases, restrictions and taxes, except those set forth
be
(i) Those rights of way and easements set forth on
Ex ibit Ai
(ii) Other rights of way and easements upon or over the
Pr which do not adversely and materially affect Grantee's
us of the PropertYi and
4
(iii) A lien for real estate taxes for the calendar year
in which the closing occurs, which taxes will be prorated on a
calendar year basis at the date of delivery of the Deed in
ac ordance with paragraph 8(C) below.
The Deed will convey to Grantee an indefeasible,
ma ketable, fee simple title to the Property. Title will be
i at regular rates by Southern Title Insurance
without any exceptions except those listed above.
Deed will prepared at the Grantor's expense: Grantee will be
re ponsible for Grantee's recording tax and Clerk's fees: Grantor
wi 1 be responsible for Grantor's tax and realtor's commission:
an each party will be responsible for its own attorney's fees.
Gr ntee will notify Grantor of any defects appearing as a result
of title examination. Grantor will cure such defects as promptly
as reasonably possible. If Grantor is not able to correct said
de ects within a period of sixty (60) days following the date of
no ification of title defects, Grantee will have the option to
ca cel this agreement and to recover from the Grantor, and the
Gr ntor will immediately pay to the Grantee, all consideration
an payments theretofore received from Grantee, including payment
fo the Option.
(B) Possession. Exclusive possession of the Property
fr e and clear of occupancy of all persons, firms or
co porations, whether or not under claim of right or color of
ti Ie, will be delivered to Grantee and their successors and
as igns at the closing.
5
(C) Taxes. All taxes levied against the Property for
year in which the sale and purchase are closed will be
p orated on a calendar year basis as of the date of closing.
G pay, or account to Grantee for, any and all taxes
c nstituting a lien against the Property. If the amount of the
t is not known at the time of closing, all payment and
a justments therefor will be based upon the most recently-
established tax rates and valuations. If any "rollback" or other
retroactive taxes are imposed against the Property on or after
date of closing, Grantor will be obligated to pay,
i ediately upon request of Grantee, that portion of those taxes,
ether with any interest and penalties thereon, which relate to
pe iods during which Grantor was owner of the Property. Grantee
wi 1 pay the remainder.
(D) Grantor's Representations. At the time of closing,
Gr ntor will warrant and represent that the matters and things
re erred to in paragraph 5 are true and have been fully complied
wi h by the Grantor.
(E) Purchase Price. At the closing, Grantee shall pay
to Grantor the purchase price as determined in paragraph 3 above,
Ie s Option payments previously paid, and as adjusted for real
es ate tax prorations, and recording taxes and fees as set forth
in paragraph 8(A) above.
9. Notices. All notices and other communications will be
in writing and will be sent by registered or certified mail,
re urn receipt requested, postage prepaid, as follows:
6
If to the Grantor:
If to the Grantee:
Either party by written notice to the other may prescribe a
different address or addressee for delivery or giving of such
notices and other communications.
10. Realtor's Commission. Grantor and Grantee acknowledge
th~t there are no real estate commissions involved in this
transaction. Grantor and Grantee will each indemnify and hold
harmless the other against all commissions or fees payable to any
real estate agent or representative which either has employed.
11. Risk of Loss. Until delivery of the Deed and payment
of the purchase price at the closing, Grantor will bear the risk
of loss, damage or injury to the Property and, at the option of
the Grantee, will repair or replace any portion of the Property
lost, damaged or injured or reduce the purchase price by an
amcunt equal to the replacement cost of the Property so lost,
dam~ged or injured.
12. Binding Effect and Assignability. The provisions
her~of will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Grantor,
Grantee and their respective heirs, successors and assigns.
Gra~tee may assign his rights and responsibilities hereunder.
7
13.
Applicable Law.
This agreement will be construed in
ccordance with the laws of the State of Virginia.
Entire Agreement, Amendments.
This agreement
14.
onstitutes the sole and entire agreement of Grantor and Grantee
nd may not be altered or amended except by written consent of
oth Grantor and Grantee. This agreement may be executed in any
umber of counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an
riginal.
15. Headings. Headings in this agreement are inserted for
onvenience and identification only and are in no way intended to
escribe, interpret, define or limit the scope, extent or intent
this agreement or any provisions hereof.
16.
Waiver and Severability.
Any condition or provision
erein for the benefit of either party may be waived 'in writing
such party, prospectively or retroactively, without impairing
the enforceability of any other term, condition or provision
Each provision of this agreement is intended to be
severable. If any term or provision hereof is illegal or invalid
for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity will not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor and Grantee have each executed
is agreement as of the date and year first above written, after
e authorization.
@~!J .~~
RESTON o. STA LINGS
8
~
ST TE OF VIRGINIA
CO NTY OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
By J~ /~1Z--
Jo Higgin5 Director of Eng' eering
\ d:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of \f\cu....! , 1992, by Preston O. Stallings.
I
~~oJCL m. S\'\~\-tlrtt
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: 10 \ '& \ lq4
STlTE OF VIRGINIA
COTNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
\ J: day of \'(\~ ' 1992, by AD \r\\ ~~\ \\5
fo County of Albern rle, Virginia.
~m~ ~t\, ffi. Sh'\\4 till
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: l2> \ ~ \ \q4
9
I.>'
(1.:
~
010 0
gN"1... .4.J
.-.., -1 .,. -....
~ ~ ~ ~ .O/II?
O~:;) C;;'
EQJ -t </;>
,gu '" \
~
-C'!
,,4.J -('I if)
!:II t-,;S
al
Q
.hI
. o'&~ -~,~ 'Wi I
&/ce> ' ':':i _fR"!D
0/~ ~ ~m
~,<v. ~ aJrn ,~~w~~ --~
.~ ~ 1
~ w ~ g
;:~~ - i :~ ~~f<~~ ~ "
,,'0/ ~ ~ ~ ~,w ~ ~ 8 ~ / Yi:~ >-
_~4 ::j~~ :ro ~~' ~~ ~_~? ~ ~ ~ f2 co ~ ~ ~/ /
ol)t';~ <:1.- -w l2 ~~ tn N 0 \ + S3 ~ ...J ~.=J I
o~ ~ ~a:a: ::J -= Ul4 Z ~ (\J <t. f2 f- /
",0'" r<'ld Q'i 3~ 8z ..::J
0.; 7zQt:; f{]~~g ~ --____ .
~, ~121'-lr\ 0: ~ ~ --;
&/ a.~1Ii1Ii - I'- a. ~ lO I
00;:0:: , , - :2: I
~ 'h, co <1'.=J u.; .:::;
"'< '0:: - ~/1 u.; - - 0 I
'~~'~ -{ ~u Ojl
"J" ::Jr.r.
<{ IL;~' - _ ' 1\J1S3& ,!:E f./)
= Ul 1../1 I--J S
ffi ~ S1 f!J1 a.t2 /..
- 8 .) ,(h 0 lO --JI :2: ,W ,~
i<i ~ 8 -~ "ecf~~/ m ~ ). f-W 9 ~
~ ~ t<) ~OO&~))o: N ~Ir;-- -- ----_J@(/
I a.:i'i r- ,'"
:2:, -...:.J
en tt 'S f-~ 9
~ zr r---
4~~: /
~d
'~Ol'-
W~;;::2
!l;o::lIilIi
I=a.cici
~
g w~t
~ ~i5~
~~ o~~ ~
~~ ~w-~~
::iCD Q>/5<:!)r<l
CD>- ro~t;Q';?;
l[1-(/) (5><i
f5c>oa:~ <:J
~ ~ 3 ~ ~.w ~ ~
~~~;~j8-8
:;~d~5ID~L-;;-
~OZooI-O:--
'-'~guwo<t..
~2f3~~~a1W
g<t8:~~o~~
w~ ~~
~PlN-!!l2
::EI'_Or<'lC\lw
III I'-W
5a:a:a:a:a:
4
;t ~ Il'IlO ~ I'-I'-~
1)-0000 a>
Wf-a>a> w
z
g;alIi~~IIi~
FUdOOOO
o
,~
6
~
w
CD
<t~
w ", a1
~z(/)
u3=~
frl~w
l[(/)~
0-
OLLa: ~ Ci
<! Cl
f2
c>
z~
~3
~~
(/)9
j~
n.o:
~
~
z
o
:>
5'
>-
co
>
:;
11)08
-g'll~
o ~N iii
~~~ 8
-e,g E' ~
CE>
::lc-!!'
a:i~~
..c"
0- :=
E III ..Q
o~ 5
;:~6
u
-=
(\j
l.1..
o
I-
W
W
I
(/)
~
o
w
~
\
,
u.; u.; u.;u.; u.; u.;
(/) en (/) en (/) en
!O~lR~lR m
..; r<l to ~ ~ IIi
w_ 2 to_ ~_I'__ 12_
~ 0<1'1'_ - (/)
N~ ~ n:::
>-b ~~
--. ~~
0 ~ 2 cd =>ffi
oz 00.;
z=> ~Dt?- ~ u~ U:J
3ft w8 wen
.(L 3!=~<(a(u a.; ~~ ...Ju..
~~ ~~~w-w ~ ~O
, :J=>13 :2:0
f- 00 (9 wZ
"'illl 55 wo::
u..:u..: ~ ;'ii3i3fTI ~ al(S
-,0.: o::oo::cro:: 0 <to.; <ten
$~~~~~~~~~~8B~2~~~~~
~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~B~~g~
~ 3= W 3= 3= 3= _W 3= 3= 3= _3= W W W _3= ! 3= W .3= _3= 3=
g~~~~~~~~~~~~~f~~~~~~
~~w~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~
6 t:: ~ ~ F: f;Q m f;Q ~ ~ ~.~ t:: ill ~ rR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
U ~~~z~~~zzzzz~z~zzzzz
" '6 .:.:. c\J ~ ~ lh ill r-:. ro (j) @
j~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-~ -lB
, lri
~ ~
~_ u:
-ilB -i-g
;t 92 i<i ~
II ffi II Q')
I- II I- II
_ .<3 _ . <3
~-r2w
<ri 3= cJ'i=
1'1= 1'1 r--
~ II ~ II to
;3 <l:-~ <l:-~
~ -8.~ -8~
rr ~'{,' ~ '{,'
a O:~ O:~
u
N
U
u ~
-=
0'
>0.
II>
~
:>
on -
"U'"C~8
t: 5~ -
~~.g~
c ~.= ts
"8 JLg' ffi
<:E>
::ic~
criE~
c~~
eVl..Q
o~ 9
.=~D
N
~~ Q:3 ~ Q5 LL
~~ ~ ~~ 0
~ N
~7~ I (\jQ.. (\jQ..
Q..r-- 0...' i~ ' ~ I all'1 0...' 0...' tJ
-r--
*2 ~2 ili2 2~ -r-- -I'-
al~~a; ~2 IO
~(\j W
ffia: a: I'1ffia.: a: I
-3=~ 2z Wa: a: a: Wa: a: a: ;1i~a: (/)
9~Ci3S 'Tli:(\j ~~(\j 1'1 'It ~F(\j to 'It ~F(\j I~(\j
~WWO ~~g *ctg ~ij' ~~g ~a:o to 0
'It (f)- ;::::~ 'ltct= 'It =
a..Z-
:EI~CD a.. ' , 0... , ' mm 0... . . aiai ~0(Ij a.. ' ,
I-q(O ~~CD ~QII1 cid ~UaJ :EQCD
00 00 dd 00 00 1-00
o
W
a::
a
u
<t
W
m
W
(/)
::>
u
::::i
m
::>
a..
~~
w<tasEl
~~(/)~
u30-L5~
::::i
~~~~
a::~~m
f2<tof2
~
~ w~~
<9 ~a1~
~ O~~ ~
~ ~wo:~~
m S<>W<9r<"l
>- 1D~~a::>-
I-(/) G>~
n::: <9 ,0 n::: <t -.
~~lfJ~~~~
O-.lO~W!zJ
g:~zffi-.l::>
LLlfl;ro::!O
~o~~~~~~
o ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ U ~i
<tg:~9u~(/)
12
~~
3~
~LL
(/)?
~8
a.. a::
W
u,
CilSlt
j::'a:Q..
zO -
wUffi
~~z
~ ;;:>:3=
~o~
oZw
Z<l:z
<l: I-~
~Z~
:s:~W
, ZO
~OZ
,U~
~WW .
(!)WIm
o::a:l-w
IJ...IJ...I-
WWO~
~~w~
IJ... a:g:
or;[TIa
~~o~
Z~WlQ
~;r;o
> 3= I I"-
ZOI-~
aI-a:
U~~Q..
W
!:r
o
lli
Z
::e
o
~
wu..
~o
o~
~o
~I
,~~
~a..1 ~~
IJ... ~ g~fu
>- 0>- a:w
I- 0 '
gzl ~ 3 ~~ I
~ 8 ~~~
u
~
w
~
>-
a: ..
f:! ~
a W
z a:
0::
1:5
z
a
(j'j
~
~
:E
a
u
>-
:E
,
',#
..
, ,~' , n t : ~ ~ \ '~l
.~ Ii i l ~) : , ( ) (
... ~
Edward H, Bai ,Jr.
Samuel Mille
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R, Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Charles $, Marlin
Rivanna
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
MEMORANDUM
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on May 6, 1992, the
rd authorized the expenditure of up to $5000 from its Contin-
cy Fund to be used to pay tip fees for cleaning up spurious
d p sites around the County. Attached is the signed appropri-
at'on form.
E:
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
June 4, 1992
TO:
JECT: Board Actions of May 6, 1992
:ec
achment
cc: Roxanne White
Robert B. Brandenburger
Jo Higgins.
"
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISC~L YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910057
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVE~TISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X,
FUND
GENERAL
PURPDSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUND NG TO PAY TIP FEES FOR CLEANING UP SPURIOUS DUMP SITES.
~XPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
****~*******************************************************************
1100p11010999999 BOS-CONTINGENCY ($5,000.00)
1100P42040510430 TIPPING FEES 5,000.00
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
**** ****~**************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
**** *******************************************************************
REQU ~STING COST CENTER: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPR( VALS: SIGNATURE DATE
DIRE( TOR OF FINANCE /~~ c:; -.2. -p.....z..
BOARI OF SUPERVISORS b-Z--Y'..2..
REAL ESTATE SALES CONTRACT
This Sales Contract made this 29th day of April, 1992, by and
etween PRESTON o. STALLINGS (Seller) and the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE,
(Buyer) ;
1. Background. The Buyer's Berkmar Drive Extension Project
right-of-way to the property owned by the Seller,
County Tax Map 45-173. The Seller currently operates a
obile home park on this parcel. There are 28 lots. At this time
ere are 27 mobile homes in place. One mobile home is owned by
The other 26 mobile homes are owned by others who rent
s ace from the Seller on a 60 day notice type rental agreement.
11 these mobile homes are occupied by renters or owners of the
obile homes.
2. Property. Seller agrees to sell and Buyer agrees to buy
e following described real property on the terms and conditions
set forth herein:
All that certain lot or parcel of land in
Albemarle County, Virginia, containing 18,814.57
square feet, described as "Right-of-Way
18,814.57 S.P. on Plat of Thomas B. Lincoln,
dated January 3, 1992, a copy of which is
attached hereto" (the "Plat"). This property is
a portion of the property conveyed to Preston o.
Stallings at deed recorded in the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County,
Virginia, in Deed Book 710, Page 182.
The Seller further agrees to sell to buyer a 20 foot drainage
appurtenant to the 18,814.57 square foot parcel for right-
o -way, the location of which is shown on the Plat.
Seller agrees to sell and agrees, to ~xecute to convey Residue
C as provided by Buyer.
E
3. 'Purchase Price. The purchase price for the property is
$22,500.00 which will be payable to the Seller by cash or certified
closing.
4. Other Temporary and Permanent Easements. The Seller
rants and coveys unto the Buyer and its contractors a temporary
easement over the right-of-way, Residue A, Residue B
C, as shown on the Plat for use by the Buyer's
for construction of the Berkmar Drive Extension and for
of the mobile homes on the Property, including
mobile home locations and necessary water,
electrical, telephone, and other utilities and access
riveways for the new mobile home locations as shown on a
plan for the mobile homes attached hereto as Exhibit B.
is temporary construction easement shall expire upon completion
the project and acceptance by the Buyer.
The Buyer agrees to construct a new entrance on the east side
Berkmar Drive for the mobile home park access, as shown on the
r location plans attached hereto at Exhibit B.
5. Closing. Delivery of the deed and purchase price shall
place once all mobile homes currently on the property have
relocated as set forth on the relocation plans attached hereto
as Exhibit B. Settlement shall be at the office of Seller's
a torney, Charlottesville, Virginia.
6. Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes for the 18,814.57
s uare foot parcel shall be due from Seller for the 1992 tax year
u to the date of closing.
7. Title of Property. Buyer shall have the right to have the
to the contract property examined at its own expense. In the
a defect in title is found which will prevent the title from
eing marketable, and such defect is not cured by the Seller within
reasonable time after written notice from the Buyer, Buyer shall
have the right to void this sales contract. Seller
cause its property to be conveyed to the Buyer by deed
ontaining General Warranty and English Covenants 0 f Tit 1 e ,
at Seller's expense and the Seller paying the state
tax. The deed of conveyance shall be subject to existing
agreements and restrictions of utility easements of
8. Condition of Property. Buyer represents that an
'nspection satisfactory to Buyer has been made of the property, and
yer agrees to accept the property in its present condition.
9. Sales Commission. Seller and Buyer acknowledge that no
estate agent was involved in this sale and each agrees to hold
harmless from any claim for commission by reason of any
their part.
10. Conditions Involving Relocation of Mobile Homes. Buyer
the relocation plan for the mobile homes, as
stout on the relocation plan attached hereto as Exhibit B at its
s le cost in an expeditious and efficient manner. This work is to
clude water and sewer service to each mobile home located on
scribed parcel. Buyer shall be responsible for providing at its
c st any temporary housing required as a result of relocation and
s all be responsible for any damages that may occur to mobile homes
tenants other personal property as a result of the extension of
rkmar Drive Extended and relocation of mobile homes.
Buyer agrees to name Seller as an additional insured on its
eneral liability insurance policy and to have the Seller named as
n ,additional insured on its contractor's general liability
. nsurance policy for this project. Copies of endorsements shall be
upplied to Seller prior to the beginning of construction on the
roperty.
Seller agrees to cooperate with Buyer in notifying mobile home
enters and owners of the Berkmar Drive Extended project and mobile
relocation plan. Renters and owner shall be notified of the
dates and relocation dates as the same may effect individual
11. Entire Agreement. This Sales Contract constitutes the
ntire agreement between the parties and may not be modified or
except by written instrument executed by the parties.
12. Applicable Law. This Sales Contract shall be construed,
'nterpreted and applied according to the law of Virginia. It shall
e binding upon and shall enure to the benef it of the heirs,
ersonal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals.
1
. o'f '\]1'RG1~1A
>;)'rgrE of ~L'BEMJl>Rl,$
cOU~'!"i
'r'he foregoin.9
1.99'2., bY
~'
f roe t"ni.s
"as ac1<no,,1.edged be. o:re
O sta'llJ..ngs.
1?reston .
~ daY of
, eS. - \ "1 I \QJ..\____
MY commiSsion E~P~:r .~
f 'J1RG1~11\
s'r1\TE 0 of 1\L'BE~LE
co\J1i\~ ckno'\Hledge
, 9 '\Has a
T"ne foregoJ..n
~ 199'2. bY C"nairroanr
I r
---r 1 '\]irgi.nia.
Alberoa e,
J y.h daY of
e t"nis tR.-
before m of countY of.
f. super"iSors
'Board 0
CLLJ
"\' C
~otarY 1?ub.1-J..
~Z9 /9q3>
'reS~
co~ission E~PJ.. '
'tAY
\
\
\
,
\
i
~ lu
(')
~
o'
F:: [,
~ w
.~ ~ ~
ATE OF VIRGINIA
UNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this ~ day of
, 1992, by Preston o. Stallings.
\)l~~(L '0\.. S'^'~\ \ t~ t1
Notary Public ~
y Commission Expires:~
TATE OF VIRGINIA
OUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing was acknowledge before me this to ,+h day of
, 1992 by Chairman, Board of supervisors of County of
le, Virginia.
7J16- W (O~~1"
Notary Public
/lAr'lj 29/ 19q3
y commission Expires:
~
"
'1\
w
(/)
:J
U
:J
m
:J
a..
~12
<! -;; 0
')P-~(9wl=!
~::>Z~<!
3=U~ ~
.' :J 0 w
om~llio
~~o~w
Clgj~~m
rY-LL<(OP-
12
(9
z
<:9
z
o
@
en
>-
~~
W z
a.. :J
~ ..J
~ ~
o ,
z 0
Q z
~~
~ rt:
<! a..
o
W
,0:::
a
~
w
m
u
c
~
i5
>-
Cl
>
:;
lI)o8
1""eg;
o ~N LO
~~~ 8
gJlg' 83
cE>
::lcJ!!'
.~-=
Q:)~~
.. c E
F<'Q
o~ [;
;:::~6
CD
Q
I
\ to
<t
N
LL
o
I-
W
W
:I:
(/)
(/)
t?
~
w8t
~~~
o~o Sl
F= <i~~
~~ffi~r<>
mgs~~b:
o 0::: ~ _ ~
~~~~~
~~..J5_
oz~du8
~ w-
o ..J _"
806 ~--::-
~ ~ ~,~ ~
~9D~(/)
\
,
~
o
w
~
LL u.: u.: u.: u.: u.:
vi vi vi vi vi vi
lO~:r.~m ~
.; r<i1Ci"":\B ro
(jj 21O~ l- \2
ro o<ir: --
(\j -t Q!
>-5
~~
u~
w8
~~
wZ
~S
<.(0..
(/)
0:
>-~
~>
5[5
un.
:J
w(/)
-hI..,
rco
::;00
lJJO:
m<(
<t2
o
OZ
Z:J
~f2
o~
0::0..
17 II
u.:
'::0.:
;:I m
>-,~ 2. ~
~(J). = = <l
:!f' w: ~a1-'J a..
lJ.f - -
~s.7www <l
~z553 ~
:r: ---- (!)
C2;i f{llGf{l 0:
0:00::0::0: 0