The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-06-03 FIN A L 9:00 A.M. June 3, 1992 Room 7, County Office Building 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. , 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) *Consent Agenda (on next sheet). 6) Approval of Minutes: June 12, September 18, 1991; May 20 (Afternoon), 1992. 7) Highway Matters: a) Discussion: 1992-93 Highway Budget. b) Report: Route 708/631 Intersection. c) Draft Letter: Route 682. d) Other Highway Matters. 8) Panorama Farm Subdivision: Approval of family division within an Agricultural/ Forestal District. 9) 10:00 A.M. - Public Hesr.in2: To include Stone Robinson Elementary School in the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for "water only" service. ' 10) 10:10 A.M. - Public Hesr.in2: ZTA-92-04. To amend the fees for Day Care, Home Occupation, and others. 11) 10:30 A.M. - Public Hea.:ring: CPA-92-03. Community Facilities Plan - County Government Administration. 12) Agricultural/Forestal District Change: a) Amend Section 2.1-2 of the County Code to establish a fee for withdrawal of property from a district. ' b) Appointment of an Additional Member to the Advisory Committee. 13) Whitewood Road Park Committee Report. 14) Strategic Plan for Information Services. 15) Solid Waste: Illegal'Dump Site Program. 16) Appropriations: a) Carl Perkins Vocational Education Grant. b) Dare Program Grant. c) Reimbursement - Manville Property Damage Settlement Trust. d) Annual Appropriation Ordinance. e) Northside Library. 17) Work Session: Sign Ordinance. 18) Work Session: Open Space & Critical Resource Plan. 19) Lunch: Police Department. 20) Police Foundation Concept, Discussion of. 21) Executive Session: Personnel. 22) Work Session Continued: Open Space & Critical Resource Plan. 23) Scottsville Boundary Line Adjustment, Discussion. 24) Economic Development, Discussion of letter to Mr. Framme. 25) Discussion of Meeting with Secretary of Economic Development. 26) Appointments. 27) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 28) 4:00 P.M." Joint Meetinlt with School BOBrd" Rooms 5/6: a) School Nurse Program. b) Discussion: Carryover Balance. c) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda. 29) 7:00 P.M. - Joint Public Hearl:ntr with the Planning Commission: Report of the Albemarle County Housing Advisory Committee. 30) Adjourn. CON S E N T AGE N D A FOR INFORMATION: 5.1 Letter dated May 11, 1992, from E. C. Cochran, Jr., State Location and Design Engineer, giving notice of a Location and Design Public Hearing for Route 691 (Tabor Street), Crozet. 5.2 Letter dated May 13, 1992, from Ray Pethtel, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, re: 1992-93 Fiscal Year Construction Allocations for the Secondary System. 5.3 Schedule for Building Locator and 911 Enhanced Implementation. 5.4 Minutes of the Planning Commission for May 19, 1992. 5.5 Letter dated May 28, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Highway Engineer, entitled "Current Projects - Construction Schedule." ..,. T Edward H. Baih. Jr. Samuel Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville David P. Bow~rman Charlottesville Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. H~mphris Jack Jouett i Walter F. Perkins White Hall MEMORANDUM TO~ Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community Development FRrM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC ~ I I DArE: June 4, 1992 SU~JECT: Board Actions of June 3, 1992 , At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on June 3, 1992, the following actions were taken: I I Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. There were none. Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matter: Discussion: 1992-93 Highway Budget. Set a public hearing on the 1992-93 Highway Secondary Improvements Budget for I Ju~y 1 at 9:15 a.m. , Agenda Item No. 7b. Highway Matter: Report: Route 708/631 Intersection. DEtERRED action on the proposed improvement to the Route 708/631 intersection until December 2 and requested that traffic counts be taken during the summer I mo~ths and included in a report to the Board. The Board also asked the Highway De~artment to install a sign on Route 708 to make motorists aware of the danger- ous curves. Agenda Item No. 7c. Highway Matter: Draft Letter: Route 682. AUTHORIZED th~ Chairman to sign the attached letter to Secretary Milliken. Memo To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. v. Wayne Cilimberg June 4, 1992 Date: Page 2 Agenda Item No. 7d. Other Highway Matters. The Board asked the Highway Department to look at the terrain on Route 631, Rqute 20 and I-64 to see if a full clover-leaf is feasible and if there are f~deral or primary funds available for such a project. The Board also asked that the Highway Department reconsider its position concerning an interchange at A~n Street. Due to the improvements taking place to Barracks Road, it was suggested th~t the Highway Department consider redirecting traffic that is traveling be~ond Georgetown Road on Barracks Road to an alternate route. Agenda Item No.8. Panorama Farm Subdivision: Approval of family division within an Agricultural/Forestal District. APPROVED the subdivision of an exist- I in~ dwelling on 4.43 acres within the Panorama Agricultural/Forestal District an~ determined that the subdivision is equivalent to a family division. I Agenda Item No.9. 10:00 A.H. - Public Hearing: To include Stone Robinson El~mentary School in the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Au~hority for "water only" service. AMENDED the service area boundaries of the Alpemarle County Service Authority to include Stone Robinson Elementary School (T~x Map 79, Parcels 22 and 23A) for water only service. Agenda Item No. 10. 10:10 A.H. - Public Hearing: ZTA-92-04. To amend the fefs for Day Care, Home Occupation and others. ADOPTED the attached ordinance tolamend and reenact Section 35.0 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance entitled "Fees" to change the fee for a special use permit for day cares cen- tets. Amended Zoning Ordinance sheets will follow under separate cover. I Agenda Item No. 11. 10:30 A.H. - Public Hearing: CPA-92-03. Community Fa~ilities Plan - County Government Administration. ADOPTED the County Govern- me*t Administration section of the Community Facilities Plan (Attachment B) to be I included as an element of the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan, with the foJ,lowing amendments: Page 2, #1, in the sentence reading: "Provide 250 sq~are feet net ...." change to read: "Consider 250 square feet net ...."; and Pa~e 3, #5, in the sentence reading: "Provide a minimum ...." change to read: "Cqnsider a minimum ...." I The Board requested staff to bring back a report in 60 days on the parking cr~teria and whether the City has made any changes to its Zoning Ordinance regarding its parking requirements. I Agenda Item No. 12a. Agricultural/Forestal District Change: Amend Section 2.~-2 of the County Code to establish a fee for withdrawal of property from a di~trict. SET a public hearing for July 1, at 10:00 a.m., to consider amending and reenacting Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, Section 2.11-2(c) to charge an application fee for withdrawal of land from an agricultu- rall and forestal district. For the public hearing, the Board requested staff to bri~g back the actual staff costs involved. Memo To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg June 4, 1992 Date: Page 3 Agenda Item No. 12b. Agricultural/Forestal District Change: Appointment ofl an Additional Member to the Advisory Committee. APPOINTED the County As~essor as the tenth member to the Agricultural and Forestal District Advisory Coknittee. I Agenda Item No. 13. Whitewood Road Park Committee Report. ACCEPTED the Ma$ter Plan for Whitewood Forest Park as outlined in the attached "Whitewood FOTest Master Plan Report". The Board requested that someome from staff monitor th~ Park for a couple of hours to see how much usage is taking place. Agenda Item No. 14. strategic Plan for Information Services. DEFERRED to Ju~y 1 so that Mr. Bowerman and Mr. Bain could meet with committee members to ad~ress some concerns. I I Agenda Item No. 15. Solid Waste: Illegal Dump Site Program. It was the COfSENSUS of the Board to approve the recommendations outlined in the attached report dated June 2, 1992. I Agenda Item No. 16a. Appropriation: Carl Perkins Vocational Education Gr~nt. APPROVED. Original forwarded to Melvin Breeden under separate cover. I I Agenda Item No. 16b. Appropriation: Dare Program Grant. APPROVED. Ortginal forwarded to Melvin Breeden under separate cover. I Agenda Item No. 16c. Da~age Settlement Trust. separate cover. Appropriation: Reimbursement - Manville Property APPROVED. Original forwarded to Melvin Breeden under Agenda Item No. 16d. Appropriation: Annual Appropriation Ordinance. ADqPTED. Copies have been forwarded to all parties. Agenda Item No. 16e. Appropriation: Northside Library. APPROVED. Origi- na~ forwarded to Melvin Breeden under separate cover. Agenda Item No. 17. Work Session: Sign Ordinance. Set a public hearing on ithe proposed sign ordinance for July 8. The Board requested that it receive a ~opy of the sign ordinance with all revisions as soon as possible. Agenda Item No. 18. Work Session: Open Space & Critical Resource Plan. SCHEDULED a work session for June 10, at 4:00 p.m. I I . .l Memo To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg June 4, 1992 Dcite: pci,ge 4 I Agenda Item No. 20. Police Foundation Concept, Discussion of. ENDORSED I t~e concept of a Police Foundation and authorized Chief Miller to move forward wilth its formation as outlined in the attached Articles of Incorporation and By!-Laws. I Agenda Item No. 23. Scottsville Boundary Line Adjustment, Discussion. S~EDULED a work session for July 1. I I , , Agenda Item No. 24. Economic Development, Discussion of letter to Mr. Fr~mme. Mrs. Humphris suggested several changes to the letter. Letter to be I reprafted for discussion on June 10. : Agenda Item No. 25. Discussion of Meeting with Secretary of Economic Derelopment. DIRECTED staff to proceed with a table top analysis and provision of: industrial site locations within the State's database as suggested by Mr. I Frflmme and Mr. Keogh. Agenda Item No. 26. Appointments. : APPOINTED Mrs. Ruthann F. Brown to the Children and Youth Commission, with safd term to expire on November 14, 1994. I APPOINTED Mr. Rudolph A. Beverly to the Architectural Review Board, with satd term to expire on November 14, 1992. I : APPOINTED the following citizen members to the Fiscal Impact Committee: I Mefsrs. A. Bruce Dotson; Jay McNeeley; Blake Hurt; Michael K. Semanik; Peter G. Ha~lock; C. Timothy Lindstrom; and Dennis S. Rooker. I I I : APPOINTED the following Planning Commission members to the Fiscal Impact Co$rnittee: Ms. Ellen I. Andersen and Mr. William J. Nitchmann. I : APPOINTED the following Board of Supervisor members to the Fiscal Impact I CO$mittee: Mrs. Charlotte Y. Humphris and Mr. Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. I I I I AUTHORIZED the Clerk to advertise for applications for the citizen member va~ancy on the Library Board. I The Board will make appointments to the Piedmont Community College Board of Di~ectors on July 1. I Agenda Item No. 27. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. AUTHORIZED the County Executive to sign the attached agreement for con- I st~uction of a water main through Crozet Crossing. Memo To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg June 4, 1992 Dif.te: Page 5 Mr. Perkins requested an update on the Crozet Crossing project for the Citizen's Advisory Committee. Mr. Bain requested a staff report on a proposal from Mr. Gordon Walker cqncerning an incentive program that provides a tax credit to elderly people for vqlunteering a certain number of hours on certain kinds of projects. Set a public hearing for July 1, at 10:15 a.m., to amend and reenact Sec- t~on 2-2.1, Compensation of board of supervisors, to set the Board's salary for F1:f 1992-93. Agenda Item No. 28a. School Nurse Program. RATIFIED the School Board's d~cision on the School Nurse Program including restrictions and guidelines in o~der for this procedure to go forward. Agenda Item No. 28b. Discussion: Carryover Balance. It was the CONSENSUS of Board that the School Division can use its ending fiscal year fund balance on a pro-rated basis for those individual cost centers that end the fiscal year with a positive balance. An appropriation will be made at a later time. Agenda Item No. 28c. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda. The School Board asked the Board of Supervisors for help on legislative requests during the next session of the General Assembly. Agenda Item No. 29. 7:00 P.II. - Joint Public Hearing with the Planning ~ssion: Report of the Albemarle County Housing Advisory Committee. The Board directed the Planning Commission to review the recommendations outlined in the report of the Albemarle County Housing Advisory Committee, in~luding statements made at the public hearing, and make a recommendation to thE$! Board on implementing the various aspects of the report as soon as possible. If'a recommendation is tied to funding, then that item should be brought back to the Board prior to the Board beginning the budget process in October. LEN: ec Attachments cc: Robert B. Brandenburger Richard E. Huff, II Roxanne White Jo Higgins Amelia Patterson Bruce Woodzell George R. st. John File .., .. . _/ ., ./ (. ( :,( .::.: / ) COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSION~R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 ,.,'. May 11, 1992 " . -iARt..-(f~ COCHRAN, JR. SlAkLO( ~110N AND DESIGN ENGINEER : . if-' Route 691 (Tabor Street) Proj. 0691-002-234, C-501 Albemarle County Intersection Improvements at the Intersections of Route 240 and High Street (Route 1204) Shelby J. Marshall Clerk of the Court :Albemarle County 501 E. Jefferson Court Sq. Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 Dear Shelby J. Marshall: A t t a c h e d i saP ubI i c Not ice an d Map a d vis i n g 0 f a pro p 0 sed highway improvement project. Should you desire additional information or have any questions br comments concerning this highway matter, please refer to the above project number and description when you contact this office. Sincerely, ~ --- /" \,-," / ~ ,---. L-~~ 0--.-- J E. C,~cochran, Jr., P.E. . State Location and Design Engineer u _7 C") co ...J . ~ r t~ ~ ~. -") , , TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY .-... .. PUB L I C NOT ICE PROPOSED HIGHWAY PROJECT ROUTE 691 (TABOR STREET) ALBEMARLE COUNTY Representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) will hold a Location and Design Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m. at the Crozet Elementary School located on Route 810, approximately 0.4 mile north of Route 240, in Crozet. VDOT representatives will also be present at the Crozet Elementary School immed i at ely pre ceding the hearing from 5: 00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. for an informal review of available information by interested citizens. All interested persons are encouraged to review the proposal prior to the formal hearing. The purpose of this Public Hearing will be to consider the proposed location and design of Route 691 (Tabor Street) in Albemarle County. This project consists of intersection improvements at the intersections of Route 240 and High Street (Route 1204). In conjunction with the proposed improvements to the intersections of Route 240 and High Street (Route 1204), adjacent streets that are within the project limits may be altered by the proposal. . -. . All interested parties ar'e urged to attend and give the Department their comments and suggestions relative to the !proposed highway improvements. I Maps, drawings, and other information are available for public review in the Department of Transportation's District Office located on Business Route 15, just south of Route 3, in CUlpeper and in its Residency Office located on Route 250, 3.0 miles east of Charlottesville. Written statements and other' exhibits relative to the proposed projects :nay be pr'esented in place of, or in addition 'to, oral statements at the hearing. Such written statements and : exh i bits may also be s ubm it ted to the Department at any time :within ten days after the public hearing. Individuals requiring special assistance to attend and !participate in this meeting should contact the Charlottesville :Resident Engineer at (804) 296-5102. ,..... VI'llnl. 00.......... o.T..n......"on May 11, 1992 ~. . ~ ~ ~ \~ "--44-,f '::9" ~~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~'~ VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TABOR STREET (ROUTE 691) ALBEMARLE COUNTY PROJECT: 0691-002-234 C-501 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 240 AND AT HIGH STREET (RTE 1204) j i -~.\ "'" Crout 240 RA.tl WA r 'ftiii SCALE Length In Feet I o 1320 I 2640 , t' RAY D. PE~HTEL COMMISSlpNER tJ .5 _-.(9- 7'.:c "'''''-~'''''''''''',"".",..........,-"""""""".-:. C/? / 'C- ,- , '.>( . -~.f.~.-:(CY 2) ", ,,: COMMONWEALTH of VIR~A- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I' U { 1401 EAST BROAD STREET r' :' i\ \\ ~ '(I ;~ 'I~C:') RICHMOND. 23219 I i\ \ \ " ,. -' I. L l~ [r:::.F-.......~:; May 13, 1992 :\ ;,-, .',,, ;, L, 1992-93 Fiscal Year Construction Allocations Secondary System and Arlington & Henrico Counties $oards of Supervisors of All ~ounties and the Suffolk City Council I I fadies and Gentlemen: I i i Enclosed is a copy of the estimated Secondary Construction ~llocation for fiscal year (FY) 1992-93 for each jurisdiction in ~he secondary System. i i The department's district administrators and resident $ngineers will prepare for your review a list of projects to which 1Fhese funds are proposed to be budgeted, in accordance wi th wriorities in your county's six Year Plan. I I : FOllowing your public hearing and adoption of the FY 1992-93 l'riority list, your resident engineer will prepare an annual budget eflecting these priorities, thereby implementing your six Year Ian in an orderly manner. I : I appreciate your assistance and cooperation, especially 4uring this period of financial constraint, as we strive to improve the Commonwealth's transportation network and the fulfillment of ~ur mutual transportation goals. I I I I Enclosure I Sincere~. ~ ~pethtel' Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA RAY D. PE HTEL COMMISSI NER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND. 23219 GERALD E. FISHER STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER May 13, 1992 TO: District Administrators Resident Engineers - Direct SUBJECT: Secondary system Construction Fund Estimates and Preparation of Annual Secondary Budgets Fiscal Year 1992-1993 DstructioD Fund Estimates: Attached are estimates of secondary system construction nds for FY 1992-93 prepared according to applicable ctions of the Code of Virginia. Please note the following: A. Area calculations are adjusted for annexations. B. Population estimates are provided by the Center for Public service, based upon the 1990 U.S. Census. C. Miles of eligible non-hardsurfaced roads, as of December 31, 1990, are provided by the Traffic Engineering Division. D. Estimated funds are in accordance with projections furnished by the Budget Division on May 12, 1992. eparation of Annual Budgets: Resident Engineers are requested to prepare their annual provement priority lists for submission to the Boards of pervisors, for presentation at advertised public hearings, required by S33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia. Each iority list should contain estimates of project costs, the ase of work being financed, and the total funds available, shown in the attached allocations. Following the public hearing in each county, the board supervisors, with your concurrence, shall adopt a priority ogram for the ensuing fiscal year. VDOT shall then include TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Tom Blackburn at 786-7428. G~F/TFB I A}tachments: I I pp: Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Dr. Dr. J~fc:Jd.- Gerald E. Fisher state Secondary Roads Engineer Secondary Construction Allocation Ray D. Pethtel J. W. Atwell D. R. Gehr D. L. Eure M. S. Hollis Mary Lynn Tischer Amy O'Leary REVISED 5/13/92 SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATIONS 1992 - 93 FISCAL YEAR BRISTOL DISTRICT Construction Unpaved Road Funds % Funds % Totals (33.1-23.4 C) (33.1-23.1 :1) , STA~TOTALS $130,710,200 100.000 $27,304,300 100.000 $158,014,500 I I Bland i $368,603 0.282 $177,751 0.651 $546,354 Buchanan $1 ,261 ,353 0.965 $502,399 1.840 $1,763,752 I I I Dicken,on $728,056 0.557 $321 ,918 1.179 $1,049,974 Graysoh $762,040 0.583 $740,766 2.713 $1 ,502,806 I I , , Lee I $996,012 0.762 $559,738 2.050 $1,555,750 I I , I I Russelll $1 ,062,674 0.813 $886,571 3.247 $1 ,949,245 I I Scott I $1 ,016,925 0.778 $943,091 3.454 $1,960,016 I I I I ! Smyth I $899,286 0.688 $267,036 0.978 $1 ,166,322 I Tazew~1I $1 ,263,968 0.967 $409,565 1.500 $1 ,673,533 I I I Washington $1,463,954 1.120 $505,676 1.852 $1,969,630 Wise $1,138,486 0.871 $57,612 0.211 $1 ,196,098 Wythe i $762,040 0.583 $681 ,242 2.495 $1,443,282 I DISTRICT $11 ,723,397 8.969 $6,053,365 22.170 $17,776,762 I TOTALS I , I , , I REVISED 5/13/92 SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATIONS 1992 - 93 FISCAL YEAR FREDERICKSBURG DISTRICT Construction Unpaved Road Funds % Funds % Totals (33.1-23.4 C) (33.1-23.1 :1) STAT ~ TOTALS 130,710,200 100.000 27,304,300 100.000 158,014,500 I Carolin~ $854,845 0.654 $63,073 0.231 $917,918 I I I I $440,493 0.337 $62,527 0.229 $503,020 Essex I I I I GIOucerter $1 ,018,232 0.779 $111 ,948 0.410 $1,130,180 I King Gtorge $507,156 0.388 $69,080 0.253 $576,236 I I King & Queen $416,966 0.319 $131 ,334 0.481 $548,300 I I I King Wjlliam $516,305 0.395 $98,569 0.361 $614,874 I I I Lancas~er $410,430 0.314 $20,478 0.075 $430,908 I I I $301,941 0.231 $40,410 0.148 $342,351 Mathevys I I I Middlefex $342,461 0.262 $33,311 0.122 $375,772 I I Northu~berland $440,493 0.337 $12,014 0.044 $452,507 I , I Richmqnd $350,303 0.268 $19,932 0.073 $370,235 I I I Spotsy~vania $1 ,909,676 1.461 $226,626 0.830 $2,136,302 I I , Stafford $1 ,882,227 1.440 $78,363 0.287 $1 ,960,590 I , I I westmfreland $607,802 0.465 $76,725 0.281 $684,527 I DISTRI~T $9,999,330 7.650 $1 ,044,390 3.825 $11 ,043,720 TOTAL REVISED 5/13/92 SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATIONS 1992 - 93 FISCAL YEAR NORTHERN VIRGINIA DISTRICT Construction Unpaved Road Funds % Funds % Totals (33.1-23.4 C) (33.1-23.1:1 ) STAT ~ TOTALS 130,710,200 100.000 27,304,300 100.000 158,014,500 Arlingtc n $4,802,293 3.674 $0 0.000 $4,802,293 Fairfax $22,338,378 17.090 $11,744 0.043 $22,350,122 LoudoL n $2,342,327 1.792 $1 ,455,865 5.332 $3,798,192 Prince William $6,245,333 4.778 $283,692 1.039 $6,529,025 DISTRI PT $35,728,331 27.334 $1,751,301 6.414 $37,479,632 TOTAL S REVISED 5/13/92 SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATIONS . 1992 - 93 FISCAL YEAR SALEM DISTRICT Construction Unpaved Road Funds % Funds % Totals (33.1-23.4 C) (33.1-23.1 :1) ST AT~ TOTALS 130,710,200 100.000 27,304,300 100.000 158,014,500 Bedford $1 ,822,100 1.394 $785,272 2.876 $2,607,372 , Boteto~rt $1 ,016,925 0.778 $333,112 1.220 $1 ,350,037 Carroll : $1 ,099,273 0.841 $712,915 2.611 $1,812,188 Craig $233,971 0.179 $58,158 0.213 $292,129 Floyd , $623,488 0.477 $396,458 1.452 $1 ,019,946 Franklin $1 ,512,317 1.157 $276,593 1.013 $1 ,788,910 Giles $538,526 0.412 $271 ,405 0.994 $809,931 Henry $1,884,841 1.442 $21 ,024 0.077 $1 ,905,865 , Montgqmery $920,200 0.704 $500,488 1.833 $1 ,420,688 Patrick : $844,388 0.646 $422,398 1.547 $1,266,786 Pulaski: $896,672 0.686 $304,170 1.114 $1 ,200,842 , Roanol<e $2,193,317 1.678 $34,403 0.126 $2,227,720 DISTRICT $13,586,018 10.394 $4,116,396 15.076 $17,702,414 I TOT AL$ REVISED 5/13/92 SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATIONS . 1992 - 93 FI SCAL YEAR SUFFOLK DISTRICT Construction Unpaved Road Funds % Funds % Totals (33.1-23.4 C) (33.1-23.1 :1) ST A Tf TOTALS 130,710,200 100.000 27,304,300 100.000 158,014,500 Accomack $1,197,305 0.916 $13,652 0.050 $1 ,210,957 , Greensville $477,092 0.365 $15,290 0.056 $492,382 , , Isle of Wight $807,789 0.618 $171,198 0.627 $978,987 James City $1,073,131 0.821 $3,277 0.012 $1 ,076,408 Suffolk, $1 ,390,757 1.064 $71,264 0.261 $1 ,462,021 Northar"pton $528,069 0.404 $0 0.000 $528,069 Southa~pton $948,956 0.726 $149,901 0.549 $1 ,098,857 Surry $377,752 0.289 $15,290 0.056 $393,042 Sussex; $662,701 0.507 $122,596 0.449 $785,297 York , $1,240,440 0.949 $8,191 0.030 $1,248,631 DISTRICT $8,703,992 6.659 $570,659 2.090 $9,274,651 TOT AL$ REVISED 5/13/92 FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 SECONDARY SYSTEM FACTORS USED IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF STATE FUNDS DISTI ~ICTS COUNTIES AREA POPULATION AREA 20% POPULATION 80% BRIS. rOL Bland 243.91 6,514 0.282% Buchanan 502.33 31,333 0.965% Dickenson 306.39 17,620 0.557% Grayson 384.03 16,728 0.583% Lee 406.00 24,496 0.762% Russell 462.45 25,268 0.813% Scott 480.63 23,204 0.778% Smyth 308.38 23,697 0.688% Tazewell 482.00 31,965 0.967% Washington 500.85 38,627 1.120% Wise 330.70 31,632 0.871 % Wythe 358.17 17,428 0.583% --------------- ------------------- -------------------------- 4,765.84 288,512 8.969% REVISED 5/13/92 FISCAL YEAR 1992.93 SECONDARY SYSTEM FACTORS USED IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF STATE FUNDS DISTRICTS COUNTIES AREA POPULATION AREA 20% POPULATION 80% FRED~RICKSBURG Caroline 413.60 19,217 0.654% Essex 258.73 8,689 0.337% Gloucester 228.10 30,131 0.779% King George 168.29 13,527 0.388% King & Queen 315.66 6,289 0.319% King William 276.25 10,913 0.395% Lancaster 137.24 10,896 0.314% Mathews 88.70 8,348 0.231% Middlesex 131.03 8,653 0.262% Northumberland 190.09 10,524 0.337% Richmond 191.40 7,273 0.268% Spotsylvania 395.42 57,403 1.461 % Stafford 220.35 61,236 1 .440% Westmoreland 228.79 15,480 0.465% ---------------- ------------------- -------------------------- 3,243.65 268,579 7.650% REVISED 5/13/92 FISCAL YEAR 1992.93 SECONDARY SYSTEM FACTORS USED IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF STATE FUNDS DISTR CTS COUNTIES AREA POPULATION AREA 20% POPULATION 80% NORT HERN Arlington 18.96 170,936 '~IRGINIA Fairfax 363.61 787,593 Loudoun 501.62 69,927 Prince William 267.18 215,686 --------------- ------------------- 1,151.37 1,244,142 3.674% 17.090% 1.792% 4.778% 27.334% REVISED 5113/92 DISTR'CTS I ! I I I SALE~ I I I I I I FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 SECONDARY SYSTEM FACTORS USED IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF STATE FUNDS COUNTIES AREA POPULATION AREA 20% POPULATION 80% Bedford 710.82 45,656 1.394% Botetourt 415.06 24,992 0.778% Carroll 463.68 26,594 0.841 % Craig 146.82 4,372 0.179% Floyd 375.62 12,005 0.477% Franklin 679.20 35,451 1.157% Giles 257.65 12,220 0.412% Henry 379.06 56,942 1.442% Montgomery 313.61 24,319 0.704% Patrick 463.89 17,473 0.646% Pulaski 274.54 24,511 0.686% Roanoke 244.46 71,667 1.678% -------------.-. ------------------- -------------------------- 4,724.41 356,202 10.394% REVISED 5/13/92 FISCAL YEAR 1992.93 SECONDARY SYSTEM FACTORS USED IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF STATE FUNDS DISTRICTS COUNTIES AREA POPULATION AREA 20% POPULATION 80% SUFFOLK Accomack 405.34 31,703 Greensville 299.85 8,853 Isle of Wight 309.85 20,367 James City 136.36 34,589 Suffolk 359.97 39,801 Northampton 213.03 13,061 Southampton 598.88 17,550 Surry 269.81 6,145 Sussex 489.61 10,248 York 68.62 42,422 .....-------------- ------------------- 3,151.32 224,739 STATE TOTALS: 34,223.73 3,733,150 Deriva~on of factors are obtained by the following method: (COUNTY AREA x 20) 1 STATE AREA + (COUNTY POPULATION x 80) 1 STATE POPULATION 0.916% 0.365% 0.618% 0.821 % 1.064% 0.404% 0.726% 0.289% 0.507% 0.949% 6.659% 100.000% FACTOR USED FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 Miles of Non-Hardsurfaced Percent Roadway as of Dec. 31, 1990 of Serving 50 or More Veh. Per Day Total BRISTOL DISTRICT 40.01 0.651 % 113.02 1 .840% 72.42 1.179% 166.63 2.713% 125.93 2.050% 199.42 3.247% 212.19 3.454% h 60.05 0.978% 92.16 1.500% 113.75 1.852% 12.96 0.211 % 153.27 2.495% ------- 1361 .81 22.170% Co nty FI SCAl YEAR 1992-93 Miles of Non-Hardsurfaced Roadway as of Dec. 31 , 1990 Serving 50 or More Veh. Per Day Percent of Total -' FREDERICKSBURG DISTRICT Ca oline 14.20 0.231 % Es ex 14.03 0.229% 25.20 0.410% Ki George 15.54 0.253% Ki & Queen 29.56 0.481 % Ki William 22.16 0.361 % 4.57 0.075% Ma hews 9.03 0.148% 7.52 0.122% 2.72 0.044% 4.46 0.073% S tsylvania 50.97 0.830% ord 17.65 0.287% 17.26 0.281 % ___'IT ,..._____ I STRICT TOTAL: 234.87 3.825% Co ~nty Fai ~ax lOldoun Prir ce William ~ISTRICT TOTAL: FI SCAl YEAR 1992-93 Miles of Non-Hardsurfaced Roadway as of Dec. 31, 1990 Serving 50 or More Veh. Per Day NORTHERN VIRGINIA DISTRICT 2.66 327.55 63.82 Percent of Total 0.043% 5.332% 1 .039% ------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------- 6.414% 394.03 Co~nty FISCAL YEAR 1992.93 Miles of Non-Hardsurfaced Roadway as of Dec. 31 , 1990 Serving 50 or More Veh. Per Day Percent of Total SALEM DISTRICT Bedford 176.67 2.876% , Bo_tourt 74.95 1 .220% Car(roll 160.36 2.611 % Cr~ig 13.06 0.213% Floyd 89.21 1.452% , Frahklin 62.24 1 .013% I GiI~s 61.05 0.994% Herjlry 4.71 o.on% Moptgomery 112.62 1.833% Pattick 95.05 1.547% , Pulaski 68.40 1.114% , Roanoke 7.73 0.126% ......_..___....L~ [)ISTRICT TOTAL: 926.05 15.076% . ' COI nty FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 Miles of Non-Hardsurfaced Roadway as of Dec. 31 , 1990 Serving 50 or More Veh. Per Day Percent of Total . SU! sex SUFFOLK DISTRICT 3.08 0.050% 3.45 0.056% 38.53 0.627% 0.75 0.012<''' 16.02 0.261 % 0.00 0.000% 33.70 0.549% 3.47 0.056% 27.56 0.449% 1.84 0.030% Ace omack *Gr~ensville Isle of Wight Jan~es City Sut olk NOI~hampton SOl~hampton Surrv Yor~ I~ISTRICT TOTAL: 128.40 2.090% STATE TOTAL: 6142.57 100.000% *Re lects mileage adjusted per 33.1-23.1:1 C. '\ ." .~r\ :.~.', ',~I .: :~l ~ 'C) .. j '/ .;'xl ,- "E ';\j ~ ,,, t: ~ ~'~ ~ ~ :~1 C) :~:. ::, ...l,.... . ;:.: .-, ,,-j cs 0 w U :z < , :r w :z ...J w ::J 0 ,.. .... w N 0: :r 0- U .... V> 0 0 N :z :z .... < 0 U"I IX I- "i 0 < l- I- III < :z '; U w 0 ::E QI ...J LU r.. ...J ~ Cl Q. :z ::E 0 ...J ::J III w :z ::J .., .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. --------------.--- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ---------------------.-----.----- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. , .... ---------------------.-----.----- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .... ---------------------.-----.----- , .... , .... , .... Z I ..... c:c . "'II -, . .... : ill ill ---------------.-----.----------- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ---------------~-----~----------- .. .... .. .... .. .... .. .... .. .... .. .... .. .... I .. ..... .. -----------.---.-.-.-.-.--------- .. .......... .. .......... .. .......... ~ ill ill .. ill ill .. .......... .. ill ill .. ill ... I ..... ill ill ill . --------------------------------- ill ill ill .. ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill .. .. .. .. ill ill ill ill ill ... ill ill .. .. .. .. -~---------~-~-~-~--------------- , , , >- , ~: I , --------------- IX Q. < IX < ::E III w ... u w o > o :z I- U o I- Q. w V> ill ill ill ill ... ill ill ill ill ... ill ill CJ . .. .. ole ;:) .. .. < .. .. .. .. -~-------~-~--------------------- .. .. .. .. .. .. >- if: .. if: ...J . .. ... ;:) .. .. .., .. .. .. .. -~-----~-~----------------------- .. .. W .. :z .. ;:) .. .. .., .. .. .. .. ---~-~--------------------------- .. .. .. .. .. .. >- .. .. < .. .. ::IE: .. .. .. .. .. .. --------------------------------- N 0- .... 01 .... C 0 QI .... QI 01 C C u .... u c 0 c .... C <1l <1l C C <1l C .- r.. r.. .- > 0 0 .- <1l QI I- a. a. <1l <1l C U C .... QI QI .- QI .- QI C r.. 0 X u 0 <1l .- <1l U 0 C I- ..... 0 ~ U U <1l U 0 "tl .... .- < QI 0 < .- r.. C <1l .- >- <1l .... III ..... <1l .... <1l .- <1l 0 ~ 0 III .- .- ~ QI .- .- r.. <1l X ~ :z III III .- > ~ III 8- I- U < .- <1l >- C QI <1l 0 QI :z .... X u .- III <1l I- .- :z .- I- 0 W ..... "tl QI ::l III III <1l U ::IE: r.. C QI a. ui ui 0 III QI "i "i "i w r.. III > .- r.. III III ..... ...J QI QI III :g >- >- Q. QI ..... u u u w > C IX C C 0 V> V> oil r.. w C C C I'" 01 01 III V> >- III 0 0 ...J < III C C c: '" QI OJ Q. .- OJ .- .- LU OJ LU LU W i Cl r.. "tl r.. "tl C r.. <1l <1l I- r.. 0 :g <1l :g (I) <1l ::l "tl u u :z 0 :g .... .... .... IX 0 0 0 "tl 0 0 LU .... 0: 0: Q. < IX < LU '" U < ...J ...J U Q. < 0- M ..0 r-: c:ci 0- 0 .... N I'l -4' Ln N -4' Ln .... .... .... .... .... .... I --------------------------------- ; ( '-, ; ',; -.. ~ ... ,. _::..-1 "~.._;"- ) ~,;. . l (c ,') (5 .:;, 1 ;~~~',';,.':'.J. \,'.J ..L'..U COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA RAY D, PEljHTEL COMMISSIO~ER I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO. BOX2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902 "':\ t, ' . 1)--, S, ROOSEVELT RESIDENT ENGINEER ,F'.. i; May 28, 1992 Current Projects Construction Schedule I Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk Boardlof Supervisors I County Office Building 401 M~Intire Road Charl@ttesville, VA 22901 I Dear fUss Neher: .ttached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently undericonstruction in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is forwatded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this mattet with them at the next meeting if they so desire. Yours truly, -~.'~~~(; '('N~ \ V D. S. Roosevelt Resident Engineer I DSR/sI1Ik I a tt acijmen t cc: &. W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY . , PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION ALBEMARLE COUNTY JUNE 1, 1992 , i I I +------+--1-----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+ IROUTE I : LOCATION I STATUS I EST.COMP I INO. I 1 I I DATE I I +------+--1----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+ I I I I I I I 250 I S~. CLAIR AVE. TO RTE. 64 I CONSTRUCTION 39% COMPLETE I SEP 93 I I I i I I I +------+--~----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+ I I~. I I I 729 I I TERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - SHADWELL I CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE I I I i I I I +------+--~----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+ I I i , I I I I +------+--~----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+ I I I , 1 I +------+--r----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I +------+--~----------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+ I I , , i i i I * REVISEP DATE ** NEW PRpJECT ~ .:. ; 7, <"! ' ! Edward H. Baih. Jr. Samuel Mil1e~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 David P. Bow~rman Charlottesville Charlotte Y. H~mphris Jack Jouett I M E M 0 RAN DUM Tq: Board of Supervisors FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC D~TE: May 29, 1992 SqBJECT: Reading List for June 3, 1992 ~ 12, 1991 p.:lg'OE: sa - Qnd - fir. Dain (2cu~ ~rpmScr 18, lqq1 paqes 1 - 21 (#8) - Mr. ~ain~~~~J' , May 20(A), 1992 - All - Mr. Marshall LE\N:ec , /C /7 '. "",// ~'/.;:.-e:- X--<',,{(J3 }5Y Forrest R. Marshall. Jr. Scoltsville Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins White Hall Edward H. Bai~, Jr. Samuel Millen COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 "arrest R. Marshall. Jr. Scottsville David P. Bowerman CharJottesvill~ Charlotte Y. H~mphris Jack Jouett : Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins White Hall June 4, 1992 Mr:. Dan S. Roosevelt Re~ident Engineer Department of Transportation pol Box 2013 Ch~rlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Roosevelt: I I At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on June 3, 1992, the fo~lowing actions were taken: I Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matter: Discussion: 1992-93 Highway Budget. Set a public hearing on the 1992-93 Highway I Sepondary Improvements Budget for July 1 at 9:15 a.m. : Agenda Item No. 7b. Highway Matter: Report: Route 708/631 In~tersection. DEFERRED action on the proposed improvement to the Ro te 708/631 intersection until December 2 and requested that tr ffic counts be taken during the swmner months and included in a !report to the Board. The Board also asked the Highway Depart- meht to install a sign on Route 70S to make motorists aware of th~ dangerous curves. I , : Agenda Item No. 7c. Highway Matter: Draft Letter: Route 68~. AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the attached letter to Sebretary Milliken. I Agenda Item No. 7d. Other Highway Matters. , The Board asked the Highway Department to look at the ter- rain on Route 631, Route 20 and I-64 to see if a full clover-leaf is: feasible and if there are federal or primary funds available fo~ such a project. The Board also asked that the Highway Depart- ment reconsider its position concerning an interchange at Avon Stlreet. , I D~TE ". /C..:. M A~ENDA ITEM NO. A~ENDA ITEM NAME D Form. 3 7/25/86 UNTIL :}/ / tJ 9' ~ , ~ ,~-( ( Ii" 4-") j /) V)) ",/"",/5 1;><'7. U 10 (,) 3, -?(C 0 ') i 1 ;: \, i''- . /CCj...... " I I ' ;) /1 . / t,( /) I ( / 1/ ~. (), /I{ (f){; ;l.. ) 'J I ./ f Jt(. .. ILl J ... fT I D~TE J . q / () O:.~ '/ Le. tJ.-f , f 7. A~ENDA ITEM NO. 1';). U Ivc 3 3- (.;,/ --;<1 tJ7 tJ :i1 &; 31 -..-..-""' [(,.rse c ,A ~r.... AaENDA ITEM NAME __[1'1 I D ... UNTIL /1e- "-? I /9 L) ",2 Form.3 7/25/86 . " David P. Bow an Charlottesvl COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 June 3,'.1992 Forrest R. Marshall. Jr. Scottsville Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins While Han e Honorable John G. Milliken cretary of Transportation airman, Commonwealth Transportation Board 9 Ninth Street Office Building chmond, Virginia 23219 0682-002-P33,NSOl Secretary Mi~liken: cent Board of Supervisors discussions on the improvements to gravel roads in bemarle County have highlighted the problems with adherence to Highway- partment geometric design standards for all rural roads. Specifically, the cessity of meeting requirements such as right-of-way, work within the right-of- y, drainage, and vertical curvature has an impact on rural property owners and 11 significantly change the rural nature of these roads, if and when they are proved. ile recognizing the necessity of providing for adequate safety and maintenance, ere are mitigating circumstances in the geometric design of specific roads that ould be considered. We recognize there are provisions for waiver of design iteria in current VDOT procedures, but a broader application is believed rranted in determining final requirements for specific roads. e Board of Supervisors requests that you give broader consideration to vironmental and aesthetic factors and the rural character of.the area and ggests a meeting with District staff and County staff to further discuss how ese concerns can be addressed for the mutual benefit of the citizens of the unty and the highway department. ........ Sincerely, David P. Bowerman Chairman D B/dbm 9 .029 c Ms. Constance R. Kinchloe, Commissioner, Culpeper District Mr. Thomas F. Farley, District Engineer Albemarle County Board of Supervisors RAY D. PE HTEL COMMISSI NER b!si: J L 0:;,,;,; .,5 -,;;t:) - 7~ .......'''"'....l:>_..'..~".... , ,:,?c:!.~t~~~;~,.?(.,. ~ , ,,\ / I, : \ .. ' COMMONWEALTH of VIRGIN~A ,-- !'O;:, , :j I J ~. "". . ... ., t'....", _.... DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P O. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902 D. S. R.QQ$l:VELT -,1'1~IOEN~ ~~INEER \ i I ,'~ ) ,,~ i , ' May 21, 1992 ". '",!!;, (' ~' ~~, , 0682-002-P33, N501 Mr. David owerman, Chairman Board of S pervisors County Off'ce Building 401 McInti e Road Charlottes ille, VA 22901 Dear Mr. The oard's action of May 6, 1992, concerning the proposed project on Route 682 has reached my office. The action letter clarifies your discussion and action, however, raises a few quest'ons which I believe require consideration and action by the Board. Due to the controvers.al nature of this project and the need for early resolution of these concerns, I am taking he unusual action of writing directly to the Board concerning this matter. It develop 787 and improvemen intersecti financed of Supervi it into t project i first and latter qu second sec my understanding that the Board's action of May 6 directs the Department to ans for the improvement of Route 682 from Route 250 to its intersection with Route purchase the right of way necessary for this improvement. The original planned for Route 682, however, extends more than a mile south of the n of Route 787. As of this date this remains one project. This single project is n the six year plan for construction late this year or next year. Does the Board ors wish the Department to continue this improvement as a single project or divide o sections with the break occurring at the intersection of Route 787? If the broken into two sections, does the Board wish us to pursue both sections as the second priority for gravel road improvements in the county? If the answer to this stion is yes, then the Department should begin right of way acquisition on the ion. upon the Board's action, I am assuming right of way on the section south of Route 787 shoul be obtained through donation. While we have not actively pursued right of way on this sect'on for approximately four years, our prior attempts have been rebutted. I anticipate that contacts with property owners along this section will reveal problems similar to those ncountered on the first section of Route 682. I do not feel right of way will be available through donation. At the Board's direction, however, we will make contacts with the proper y owners on that section. Now hat this project has been designated as a purchased right of way improvement, the requiremen s of the preliminary engineering procedure will determine when the project can be constructe. If plans are developed for the section from Route 250 to Route 787 as the Board's ac ion directs, it will take until June 1995 to complete this preliminary engineering process. Funds for the improvement of this section can be available well in advance of that date. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ,,~ (~' - ;r>.. ; . '~ ; . " ,~ (.)7."'/ ' /", ~) ;. / - ",>(.( '.-'. v /:.:~ , I I I I , ~onorable John Milliken secretary of Transportation C mmonwealth Transportation ichmond, Virginia I I I D~ar Secretary Milliken: DRAFT Board I I I R~cent Board discussions on the improvement of gravel roads in I Ailbemarle County has highlighted the implications of adherence to I I H~ghway Department geometric design standards for rural roads. I I Specifically, the necessity to meet requirements such as right- I o~-way, work within the right-of-way, drainage, and vertical I I c~rvature have a deleterious impact on rural property owners and I I s~gnificantlY change the rural nature of the road if and when I trey are improved. I I I I I I Wpile recognizing the necessity to provide for adequate safety I apd maintenance there are circumstances on specific roads that I I spould be considered as mitigating circumstances in geometric I I . dfs1gns. We recognize there are provisions for waiver of design I ctiteria in current VDOT procedures but a broader consideration I I ir believed warranted in determining final requirements for I stecific roads. I I I I T~e Board of Supervisors requests that you undertake broader I I. . . c~ns1derat1on of such factors as env1ronmental, aesthetics and I I rfral character of the area and suggest a meeting with District , staff to further discuss how these concerns can be addressed for I I I I ; the mutual benefit of the citizens of the County and the highway d~partment. , I I I I I cb: Ms. Constance R. Kinchloe, Commissioner, Culpeper District Mr. Thomas F. Farley, District Engineer STAFF PERSON: BOARD MEETING: V. WAYNE CILIMBERG JUNE 3, 1992 , ~ ... 1""'"_. 1!!" <)'1"'(' W.m:Pf-OF-IP.,;;-.';~'- !~\:,:..,... '.' '9; [j::':C~;ie;., ~~~; ".', I~ . '-';"4'-f.t?"~/:..:i'-~-::,t.~_.~~.' k.~,'p', ft" . '-',~C') F.i;t.. MAY ~;6 L,y,. : - '. '\..~- " , ~-: ;. '( \...~~.. ....r...~' ~Ir""; fti ~'~~';;:t,-~ ~::,:.!" '_~-li 1"~>'r~ . EX~(J,UTPlf~ orncs I . ~ORAMA FARM SUBDIVISION REQUEST bcation: Tax Map 45, Parcell (part). Located on an existing private road at the end of State Route 844, west of State Route 743 aind north of the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir. Zloninq: RA, Rural Areas. , ~creaqe: 711.57+ acres. ~equest: To subdivide an existing dwelling on 4.43 acres within the Banorama Agricultural/Forestal District. (See Attachment A). ~ithin an agricultural/forestal district, development right lots ~ay be utilized.only for family divisions; other divisions must be minimum 21 acres. Because this subdivision request involves a ~ransfer from a corporation (consisting of the applicant, his ~iblings and father), it does not strictly qualify as a family division. The Albemarle County Code defines "member of the ~mmediate family" as "... the natural or legally defined off-spring, EiPouse or parent of the owner..." The Board of Supervisors is ~einq asked to determine whether this subdivision meets the intent gf the exception allowed for familY divisions. The county ~ttorney's office has agreed that this is the appropriate procedure CSee Attachment B). 2jONING HISTORY: July 15, 1981 - SP-81-30 approved to permit one-14.5 acre parcel I ... not utlllzlng a development right. ~aY 20, 1987 - SP-87-06 approved to permit 24 lots on nearby parcel ~M 31, P 21, with development rights restricted on part of Panoram Farm. (As a result of this approval, SP-85-16 for 80 lots on TM j1, P21, previously deferred, was withdrawn.) April 20, 1988 - Panorama Agricultural/Forestal District approved Gn 1,066 acres for 10 years. Most of Panorama Farm, including the subject property, is not iestricted by SP-87-06 regarding development rights. Information ~ubmitted with SP-87-06 indicates that several separately recorded tracts may exist on the farm, in which case each would have development rights. (The Zoning Administrator has been requested 1:;.0 confirm the number of development rights.) The subject property is affected by a condition (condition 1.c.) which requires institution of Best Management Practices (BMPs). The Water *esource Manager has stated that this condition has been met. 1 rhherefore, the only problem remaining is the agricultural/forestal <aistrict restriction. d'he only similar previous subdivision request within an . gricultural/forestal district was approved by the Board in 1988 in he Totier Creek District. A farmer wished to sell an existing ~armhouse on a lot smaller than 21 acres in order to retain as much cpf his surrounding farm as possible. The Board approved the <aivision of a 2 to 10 acre lot, provided that it remained in the . gricultural/forestal district. ntent of Aaricul tural /Forestal Districts Reaardina Famil v bivisions: section 15.1-1511D. of the Code of Virginia states, "... dwellings for persons who earn a substantial part of their ivelihood from a farm or forestry operation on the same property, Dr for members of the immediate family of the owner, and divisions Df parcels for such family members, shall not be prohibited as a nore intensive use unless the governing body finds that such use in he particular case would be incompatible with farming or forestry n the district." rhhe Albemarle County Code provides that any parcel in an ~gricultural/forestal district shall not be developed to a more ntensive use without prior approval of the Board. The term "more ntensive use" excludes family divisions. STAFF COMMENT: staff recommends approval. This is a unique situation which we pelieve meets the intent of the Agricultural and Forestal District ~ct. The applicant is a part owner of the farm, and is actively nvolved in the farming operation. The dwelling is existing and he land use will not change. It is intended that the subdivided ot will remain in the agricultural/forestal district. 2 I ATTACHMENT AI Panorama Farms Rt 2, Box 82 AA Ear1ysvi11e, Virginia 22936 April 2, 1992 Mrs. Mary Joy Scala Department of Planning and Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 : Dear Mrs. Scala: Panorama Farms was granted Agricultural-Forestal status : April 20, 1988. Since that time, a few changes have taken place : at Panorama Farms. My parents, Mr. and Mrs. James Murray, have i built a new house on the farm, and I have moved with my family ,to the house my parents vacatedithe house I grew up in. This change in circumstances requires me to make a rather unusual request concerning the Agricultural-Forestal status of a portion ,of Panorama Farms. RECEIVED ~.OR - 6 1992 ,',"~~'~_ \~_ ,:~'- ~;~l ~ '2FT. Recently I had a plat drawn containing 4.4 acres surrounding the old farm house into which we moved. After review by the planning staff, I find that a subdivision within an Agricu1tura1- Forestal district is not permitted unless the subdivided parcel is 21 acres or more. The only variance granted by the Agricu1tura1- Forestal district legislation is through a family division. This is where the hitch is. In December 1983, for estate purposes, Panorama Farms was incorporated. The only stockholders are my seven brothers, my father, and me. Virginia state law prohibits a family division by a corporation regardless of the relationship of the stockholders. I am requesting that the planning staff grant this smaller than : allowable subdivision within Panorama Farms for several reasons. , 1. The land use has not and will not change due to this : request. I have moved to the center of my agricultural operation allowing me to farm Panorama Farms more effectively and efficiently. 2. This request will not change the density of dwellings on Panorama Farms. We are only changing a boundary and owner- ship within the boundary. 3. I am not requesting that the 4.4 acre portion be removed from the Agricultural-Forestal district. I am requesting that the 4.4 acres remain within the Agricultural-Forestal district since I currently farm nearly 2 acres of the 4.4 acres. I ATTACHMENT A I P. 2 Panorama Farms Stephen Murray April 2, 1992 Since this is such an unusual request, I don't believe it will set any sort of precedent. I would appreciate your help on this matter, and I look forward to hearing from you. si}:c...erelY., 4. . ,,1 yr:;i-1tc-1"l . Stephen M. Mur~ I Ej ~/:/~' !u i3 3 1--' ~/Q),u. 0' O~N~ It' "'/-"." I'J~ illalNm t:' ';;, I 0::/~ r_~' 'f ~ ~ "'. v, I ~ 0 '" t- o t:l! /-';; ,- J- 9 C/):~ ~0~~ . ' >- '> I'! --.. . ON", NOl:JI f- 0::> t- ,O't:'Lv ' ---.:.;--- ~': M,:SL<;Z.<;<;N ~ I}' ci , ,66'S<; , \ ~ in M..'t:'t:.6<;.09N t; r;;: ,OV'O~ M..LI,ZZ.L9Nr\ ~ ('l , '\ Iilt- Z ,"0" M"...J~;\f /r;,~~-<..'V ,ZO'~S M"vv,<;v.89N \\\ r.: ~ \';>\~ .<;1'9L M..0<;,v<;.99N \.(.\ ul \"\ ::l< ,zr8<; M,,<;<;,91.19N',: <I "I w M..0<;,'t:Z.9C;N \': e: M"C;'t:,9't:.C;C;N..\ Vl M..'t:0.S<;.6 . M"<;V.OO'6C;;N~ \ (/) M..6v,vv.9vN I) (/) M..B't:.61.0't:N !i/ 4J M..60.'t:'t:.LI%V /j /Y '" , C;;6'vv.--..... ~,~; , ,0<;'9ZI "/o..O't:,B<;.6IN 'hi' M"BI.LI.VIN .<;9'v't: /;. .IL'lv M..~'t:,B<;.Z<;N . I M::eC;;.9Z.I't:N ,k8'vZ \ M..0~.9C;.69N \\\ \~, '0 .Lr't:IZ ~0f1 M..<;0.Zv.18N ~\ ,9Z'Z9 M..'t:I.'t:I.UN\:\ I \1'\ -46'v17 M,,9v,lC;.ILN -.;. \ ,ZZ'C;L M..01.'t:1.89N \~\\ ~ ~ \'.I~ ~ in ,66''t:L M..8I.OZ.179N ,I , \;,,\ ~ ~ :g en \\\ ~ ~ i ~ ~ , ,OZ''t:81 M..00,lO.'t:9N '\ N iD VII ~ ~ ~ .Il'l9 :,~ z lo M..11.8't:.V~lN\'.' 0 \\ ~ ,<;I6'9C;; .It>l'917 : .1I'6Z ,~9''t:<; ,~O'B't: J<;6'9't: W9't: z o iij '" ! :I o U I <t -' n. >- .... z ::> o U I I I I I ,e I~ I~ IU I I it it' I ~ ........ W r ",f1>- i15?;~::1 ",,,,:O:'t!:l15 ;~ui~",.... O~t:1~~VI hn~~ Ip....n!~~ ....~:>t-o lDi4!fcn.... [5 T.-' ::I~~~;it; nn~1 ~<tg:r~ ;ih~~ ~~6~~~..; ~"'3 "'...." ~~a i~~ ~~ ~~s (\., 3 u .~ 1 Z Vl i 1 - w en f-5 -::Z:t-_<I a: w n. ::> '" u. o c . '" <t ... J? " :i. ': a ~ <t o '" >- .... 5 a u w . 0: 0: ~ ~ I~ ~ ~!!!C o 0 .... 'j )0 ~ ~ ~ :;: ~ .. 15 >- .... ~ u '" !.! .. ~ )0 l- n. z w >- ~... 0: .. ~o I- '" ~ 3!~ w II: C> 0 ~ il z 0 it; I ~~ u w ~ " .. ~ II: > ~ W I- .. :;; U 1.0 <tZ (/) 0 - W I I-O-(/}<tl- N Z<(::E<t1- 0 W::Ea::cnOI-::! ::E <( -lUZ" (/}WXLLWa::--W w(/)<( 1-<(a::C>1- a::<(I-<C::>II-Q;;<( Uw ::EOu~>O ZC> <(,^ I <C a:: 0 ~ _ v, a:: LL ~>- ~~~-~~O~~ o .U-l <(I-l I<tuW<(I-I--::> (/) <(UO-(/}a::>O LL a:: (/}U 1-0- <(LLLLOW <( OO-OLLZI-W -l >- r<1 0 ,^ I- -l 0- W >- v, 0 a:: >~LLI- W <(. a::wOa::~:::!~::Eg ::>ZZWI-::E<(WN (/}oQg,<(a::I~1I (/}1-a::U::>U<c -la::o-Oo "- <cO -lLL O-w I I- w <(I-::> -l o <( ro U <( (/) Vl <lVl VlLL Vl WO WW U'" >J uI'! <lVl <I, Iw lJJ~ Ill. J uO mZ <(J <10 WVl 5::; wI VlW ::>1::: <lVl Q~ w 13<1 0:>- wm o::W 00 0: W<l :;:~w I 0-0 f-LL nci50 0 <l.wU a z--' JO:>- <ILL :ltnt-- f- tT :;=<15 UVl owO <10 <lJU 0:0 o~w f-o "'IJ W . wWO: 0:0 uI'! f->-I w I~I f-alf- f- f-::l<f- 0 N ~ t- ~. ,.; ~ 'v t- ,"" f- !::ot- .0 Cl>-~Z in tool ~ ill ~~w~ en in f- ::l<w <Ii ;.. ~ !:QN<X(f) v x:::::cr<t v '" 0 0 W.!.l1...[J) - o::l; LLW > w f- Vl U Vl <lui' ..,J J >-:;: <Iv> o:w ,f- ~f- o O:J wo: Cl<l OI o:u l~ \ \.0 '>. -Z ci w a :;: o 0: W (/)(1) W filliZf-:f I Vl<Q~f- ~ ~8~~~ [;3 ::l;o:::l;> 'tJ -OO:owOm ~Cleuu::> <I~ZWZVlf-f- z->-fi3 LLl>-LLirll.::E <10 mf-Zf-ll.w::l<:;: Z~Vl<lI ZO o::>owo::.... 0 ~3~a:~~~eJ :3wwbf-~~~ Vlii!~~'i~ zg; 6~00:<0~LL j::wZ<o.... Ow <lal<>-Zo ilial 5ci~~:3~ U)~ ~w<f-w~ ~::l; cr:IO 'If- U wf-!,!~f-~ <I~ VlOIZI I'!Q ::J~""'Ot:o ~~ of-f-Vl:tZ vo: zzuw L'HIl ww J::>LLO~- II Vlu.ll.ZI- f-f- wo:wo:z< ~i[-=i[~~ ciai I ATTACHMENT BI 0: 1"~ f"t:": n./co n ,.,cot;;... ~ APR 1 5 1992 GEORGE m, ST.JOHN COUNTY ~TTORNEY COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of County Attorney 416 Park Street Charlottesville. Virginia 22901 Telephone 296-7138 April 13, 1992 P. ~""-'It""" n,l'.r Uw'~P~i\.;l;! '.,!~.~"J u~::'f' . JAMES M. BOWLING. IV DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY Mrs. Mary Joy Scala ~enior Planner ~lbemarle County Planning Qepartment ~01 McIntire Road dharlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 I Re: Panorama Farms Subdivision/Agricultral District/Family Division Forestal dear Mary Joy: I This letter is in reply to your memorandum dated April 8, ~992, concerning the above matter. This is to confirm that I ~gree with you that the request should go directly to the Board df Supervisors since the problem is with interpretation of a ~amily division, and since Mr. Murray is not requesting a withdrawal from the district. If you have any questions, please let me know. Very yours, James Depu . Bowling, IV County Attorney J]MB/tlh I 5-: .;..;~ 7 ~.;-L {))strihuted te 'board: ._-~--.,...-.:>...,,".~~>,," i~~i.S 11 c-, q c-. '-i AlI.endll Item N'L.__:.:.:"'::~._-';:::' . COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE , , Dept. of Planning & Community Development ~ 401 McIntire Road ,. Charlottesville, Virginia 22902.4596 (804) 296-5823 ~." ("'-' : ..., ~ Albemarle County Board of supervisors V. Wayne Cilimherg, Director of Planning and communityc/uU~ Development TE: May 27, 1992 Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) Jurisdictional Area Amendment for Stone Robinson Elementary School November 6, 1991, the Board amended the service area undaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority to include t e Glenmore Planned Residential Development, allowing provision of public water (as well as public sewer) to Glenmore at the e pense of the developer. On December 18, 1991, the Board f rther amended the Jurisdictional Area boundaries to incorporate I remaining properties as shown in the Comprehensive Plan as e Rivanna Village. e Comprehensive Plan, in the Village of Rivanna recommendations s ys, "water lines should be sized to serve the Village and Stone binson School (emphasis added) only". with the development of Glenmore in the village, a water line is being installed along t e Route 250 East corridor from the Urban Area to Glenmore. P blic water, therefore, will be close to the Stone Robinson Elementary School, providing an opportunity to meet the intent of t e Comprehensive Plan to provide public water to the school. As t e school is not in the ACSA Jurisdictional Area, the Board needs to amend the boundaries to include the school. equate water is available for the school from the current well drilled in 1985. However, the long standing difficulty in locating well water, coupled with increased fire protection equired during the 1990 school renovation and a Virginia Water Control Board recommendation to connect to public water when a ailable, makes connection to public water at this time prudent. ~ JURISDICTIONAL AR ALBEMAR EA AMENDMENT LE COUNTY 63 , \ \i-(\ ( ~e \T <- ,,' I . ~,'-..., I \ !~ \ '\ I ~.. ~. ~ " l ') /./ . I \/---- '\ \ . I. \ ", I . +\ \ '\ I i l\ \ \i. \'. .\'\ 'i ~ .. \:~ {\ ~ 1\ \ . i ~ ..'\ .~ \ '>\ ,,'\\ . I \ .. ); ~\ \' -\ '".' , 1- . .. I ' ~ LEGEND' X' _ WATER ONLY r 'I WATE i' . R AND SEWER '\ 1 ' \ ( ~ ~ / ~/ { f ~ $A 3 RIVANNA DISTRICT 80 SECTION 79 J. t III .. 5-/ -9 ~ County of Albemarle EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ~ITLE: ACSA J4risdictional Area Amendment Stone-Robinson Elementary School for AGENDA DATE: May 6, 1992 ITEM NUMBER: ~,~'32.7 ACTION: X INFORMATION: SUBJECT~PROPOSAL/REOUEST: Adopt aiResolution of Intent to amend the ACSA ju~isdictional areas for water only to Stone-Rqbinson Elementary School. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION:~ INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CqNTACTlS): Messrs. :Tucker, Brandenburger, Cilimberg. REVIEWED BY: Jw7 BACKGRO During he discussion of the 1992-93 CIP at your April 15, 1992 Board meeting, a change was noted in the Stone-Robinson CIP to delete the proposed roof repairs as they are being complet~d in the current year and use this funding for the installation/hookup for the school to the ACSA's new water line. This will require an amendment to the ASCA jurisdictional areas as the school is not in the area. DISCUSS~ON: Althoug~ adequate water is available from the current well drilled in 1985, the long standing difficu~ty in locating well water, coupled with increased fire protection required during the 1990 sc~ool renovation and the Water Control Board recommendation to connect to public water when ava~lable, the opportunity to secure a reliable water source with significantly improved fire flow rates indicates connection to public water at this time is prudent. Even though funding lis available, Stone-Robinson Elementary School is not in the ACSA jurisdictional area. RECO~ATION: Adopt a ~esolution of Intent to Amend the Albemarle County Service Authority's Jurisdiction Area fo~ water only to include Stone-Robinson Elementary School. 92.059 , . ~ ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD SUBJECT: Stone Robinson Elementary Waterline DATE: April 6. 1992 ENCLOSURES: ~ Operational: x REASON FOR CONSIDERATION: Action: --X-- CATEGORY: Policy: Information: round The fuel tank return line was damaged during construction in 1970. This entually contaminated the existing well and attempts to locate water on the uth-western portions of the property failed. However, a new well was ccessfully drilled on the north-eastern edge of the property and placed into rvice in 1985. If this well were to fail, we would have a very limited area which to drill another well. In 1990, during the last renovation, we were r quired to install a 10,000 gallon storage tank and fire pumps to provide 260 gallons per minute (gpm) of water for the limited area sprinkler system and d mestic water needs. The developer of Glenmore is currently constructing a water line along oute 250, near the school. This provides the County with an opportunity to install an 8" line that would provide a fire flow of 2700 gpm at 20 psi xtended to Stone Robinson. Because of the limited well sites, requirements for a sprinkler system and a recommendation from the State Water Control Board that we hook up to a public water supply when the opportunity becomes vailable, it would be prudent to request that the Board of Supervisors fund this project in the 1992-93 CIP Budget. The Albemarle County Service Authority estimates the cost of this line to e $40,067.50 and an additional $4,600.00 would be charged for connection ees. Engineering costs and connection to the school is estimated at $5,332.50 for a total project cost of $50,000.00. The $86,000 that has been approved for the roof replacement in the 992-93 CIP Budget at Stone Robinson will not be needed, because we are ompleting this project early with other funds. Therefore, the water line ould be funded by using $50,000.00 from this account. We anticipate using a 0,000 gallon tank and fire pumps that will be removed from Stone Robinson lementary to provide the required water supply for the renovated areas of roadus Wood Elementary. Presently, Stone Robinson Elementary is not in the Jurisdictional Area of he Albemarle County Service Authority. Therefore, it is necessary to request he Board of Supervisors to incorporate this school into the jurisdictional rea in order to hook up to the public water supply system. Continued /,,;,r;... \ J -2- ~ecommendation Request the Board of Supervisors to place the Stone Robinson Elementary $chool into the Jurisdictional Area of the Albemarle County Service Authority ~nd to appropriate SSO,OOO.OO from the 1992-93 Stone Robinson Roof Replacement *ccount for the engineering and construction of a waterline from Rt. 250 to \the school. , I rREPARED: ~VIEWED : i d(!L). ~4'A_) ~tJ~ ITEM NUMBER: 92-4-12 ~COMMENDED: I , .. i. o R DIN A N C E To amend and reenact Section 35.0, Fees, of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, th~t the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended and reenacted in Sebtion 35.0 entitled "Fees" as follows: I 35~O FEES Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made to the zoning administrator, the commission, or the board of supervisors shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth hereinafter, to defray the cost of processing such application. a. For a special use permit: 1. Mobile home - $35.00. 2. Rural area divisions - $990.00. 3. Commercial use - $780.00. 4. Industrial use - $810.00. 5. Private club/recreational facility - $810.00. 6. Mobile home park or subdivision - $780.00. 7. Public utilities - $810.00. 8. Grade/fill in the flood plain - $690.00. 9. Minor amendment to valid special use permit - $85.00. 10. Extending special use permits - $55.00. 11. Home Occupation-Class A - $10.00; Home Occupation-Class B - $350.00. 12. For day care centers - six (6) to nine (9) children - $390.00. 13. For day care centers - ten (10) or more children - $780.00. 14. All other uses - $780.00. FURTHER RESOLVED that all other fees remain the same. * * * * * I, correct Coz,inty, , Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, copy of an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle Virginia, at a regular meeting held on June 3, 1992. (~_~__---- ~~ h /~~ / - / /' / / / ../ ~L_____ erk, Board of C~ Supervisors ni':..~r.~L~:t~G to [ /'. rL.'/'? .~..--,..~.. ,.,.,-- AE~qd.'1 : :,>-','1 (~,::'" 9~ c I( I --_.- -~. -- ....' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virgmia 22901-4596 (804) 2965823 MEMORANDUM TO: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Planning and G(JlU FROM: v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director Community Development DATE: May 19, 1992 RE: ZTA-92-04 Fees The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on May 19, 1992, unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted zoning text amendment. Attached is a report which outlines this procedure. Please note that the Board is scheduled to review this amendment at its June 3, 1992 meeting. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. VWC/jcw cc: Amelia Patterson Jo Higgins STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: V. WAYNE CILIMBERG MAY 19, 1992 JUNE 3, 1992 ZTA-92-04 FEES (DAY CARE CENTERS): On March 27, 1992, the Board of Supervisors discussed possible changes in fees for Day Care Centers and Rhome Ooccupation - Class B (See Attachment A). A Resolution of Intent was passed regarding a change for Day Care Centers (See Attachment B). ~he Board felt smaller day care only operations met an identified community need and purpose and posed less of a potential land use impact than larger centers. Therefore, they propose a lower fee consistent with the smaller scale. Staff can support this reasoning and recommends favorable action. 1 I ATTACHMENT AI, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5823 MEMORANDUM TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors and~G FROM: V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning Community Development DATE: March 27, 1992 RE: Fees For Day Care Centers And Home Occupation - Class B Question has been raised as to the appropriateness of reducing fees for day care and home occupation special use permits. The new fees for these two permits are reflective of average actual cost to the County to conduct review of each type of permit, including staff review time, advertising, notifications, copying, etc. The average cost of home occupation class Bls approved administratively has been estimated to be $30 while those reviewed by Planning Commission and Board has been estimated to be $560. The Planning Commission/Board review is necessary for home occupations where there is adjoining property owner opposition. The fee was approved for $350 regardless of whether it required administrative or Planning Commission/Board approval. This was to reflect an average between administrative and Planning Commission/Board review costs. I understand this was done to remove the possibility of fees influencing adjoining owner position on an application. Planning staff sees no public purpose met in lowering fees for home occupations. Review of such applications going to the Planning Commission/Board can be time consuming. Home occupations are typically for the proprietary interest of the applicant rather than a more general community service. Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Page 2 March 27, 1992 Day care special use permits were included in a group of commercial-like uses (schools and radio towers were others) that have an average cost of $780. Our experience is that the cost for day care review is slightly higher, primarily due to review for impacts in residential areas. The fee approved for day care was $780. Day care, although not explicitly addressed in any policy documents such as the Comprehensive Plan, is considered a community service type of activity in our review. Because of this community service characteristic, it may be justified to lower fees to less than cost. However, it should be noted that other community service types of special use permits, such as schools and churches, could justify a similar break. Alternatives for dealing with day care would be to increase the number of students allowed in a facility before it is subject to special use permit review or to remove the special use permit requirement for day care altogether. VWC/jcw cc: Amelia Patterson IATTACHMENT 81 RES 0 L UTI 0 N o F I N TEN T BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle ounty, Virginia, does hereby state its intent to amend the lbemarle County Zoning Ordinance in Section 35.0 to change the fee or a special use permit for day care centel;s to $390 when the equest is for six to nine children and $780 when the request is or ten or more children; and I I FURTHER requests the Albemarle County Planning Conunission to pold a public hearing on said intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance, ~nd does request that the Planning Conunission send its reconunenda- lion to this Board for its public hearing on May 6, 1992. * * * * * I I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution of intent adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a fegular meeting held on April 1, l~~ Clerk, Board of ~rVisors .. ... . . & e~v-L-L 0/;/72- , , COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Zoning 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5875 3-30-92 FEES for Mobile Homes & Home Occupations Class B Calculation of Cost i. Mobile Homes A. Administrative review cost = $30 B. Public Hearing review cost = $200 AVERAGE = $70 A. Administrative review ~ 1) Clerical = $11.00 for 1 1/2 hour. ($7/hour rate) his is to intake the application; compile and mail notice to djacents; advertise; request inspection; and compile and mail pproval letter, or forward to Planning. 2) Administrative = $10.00 for 3/4 hour. ($15/hour tate) This is to review application for completed items, approve lat and proposed location, verify zoning, acreage etc.; to review nd sign letters; to review the legal notice; to respond to public nquiry; and to review file for final approval. : 3) Zoning Inspection = $9.00 for 1 hour. ($9/hour rate) this is to conduct an on-site inspection to verify setbacks, etc. I I I I I I I I I I I through I I I : The staff costs for review of a mobile home special !ermit were assumed to be 1/5 or 20% of that for a typical non- obile home special permit. The decreased staff time is based on ewer criteria for review and the fact that no recommendation is iven. The staff costs for review of a typical special permit are s attached on the sheet with the heading "ZMA's & SP's", which was ompleted for the zero-based budget calculations. The total is 580. The total on that sheet does not include the additional 24% ost for fringe benefits to employees, which is TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE = 11 + 10 + 9 = $30 B. Public Hearing review All applications which go to public hearing initially go the full administrative review. '.. , . ~ee calculations ~obile Homes/Home Occupations 13-30-92 ~age 2 I I I I ~qual to $140, for a total of $720 for staff costs. 1) Administrative = $30 2) Planning staff costs = $720 x 1/5 = $150 3) Zoning review after public hearing a) Administrative = $10 for 3/4 hour. This is to keview the file for compliance with conditions of approval prior to ~ssuance of building permit and later, prior to issuance of a pertificate of occupancy. : b) Inspection = $9 for 1 hour. This is to inspect ~he site for screening and other conditions of approval, prior to ~ssuance of a certificate of occupancy. : TOTAL = 10 + 9 = $20 (round up to nearest $5) I I TOTAL PUBLIC HEARING REVIEW COSTS = 30 + 150 + 20 = $200 I I fetermination of Averaqe Cost years 1987 through 1991 (to-date) were reviewed to determine he percentage of mobile homes approved administratively versus pproved by public hearings. The percentage ranged somewhat widely rom 57% administrative 43% public hearing in 1990 to 83% dministrative : 17% public hearing in 1987. The average cost anged likewise from $103 in 1990 to $59 in 1987. I ~verage cost = # applications x cost or total cost I per I application I I I I I , # applications tor 1990: 16 admin. applic. x $30 = $480 12 B.O.S. applic. x $200 = $2400 Total cost = $2880 / 28 applic. = $103 tor 1987: I 39 admin. applic. x $30 = $1170 8 B.O.S. applic. x $200 = $1600 Total cost = $2770 / 47 applic. = $59 , , , I I I ~he average cost over several years was approximately $70. This .--' . ,.. .... . .. Fees ~obile Homes/Home Occupations 3-30-92 ~age 3 is based on a ratio of 77% administrative approvals to 23% Board ~pprovals. 2. Home occupations, Class B A. Administrative review cost = $30 B. Public hearing review cost = $560 A. Administrative review This review is equal, and therefore the cost is ~quivalent to that for a mobile home special permit. B. Public Hearing review All applications which go to public hearing ~nitially go through the full administrative review. The staff costs for review of a home occupation special permit were assumed to be 3/4 or 75% of that for a typical special permit. This review typically involves other departments, such as Engineering and Inspections. In addition, it involves positive findings for the special permit criteria, including the Formulation of a recommendation. The staff costs for review of a ~ypical special permit are attached, and total $720. 1) Administrative = $20. The zoning review is less ~xtensive than that of a mobile home. 2) Planning staff costs = $720 x 3/4 = $540 TOTAL PUBLIC HEARING REVIEW COSTS = 20 + 540 = $560 Determination of Averaae Cost '~he preceding 3 years were reviewed to determine the percentage of ] ome occupations, class B approved administratively versus approved ]~y public hearings. ~or 1990: 37% admin. applic. = 4 x 30 = $120 63% Board applic. = 6 x 560 = $3360 Total cost = $3480 / 10 applic. = $348 (round) ,,~ ,.... ZMA's & SP's TOTAL CYCLE TOTAL ITEM ADDZMA Director 6 hrs Q 19.46(c) 116.76 1 hr Q 19.46(i) 19.46 Chief 12 hrs Q 15.97(c) 191.64 2 hrs Q 15.97(;) 31.94 Sr Planner 12 hrs Q 11.87(c) 142.44 15 hrs Q 11.87(;) 178.05 4 hrs Q 11.87(z) 47.48 Plamers 26 hrs Q 10.76(c) 279.76 (3) Chief CD 0.75 hrs Q 15.97(c) 11.98 Sr Planner 10 hrs Q 11.87 118.70 CD Plamer CD 0.75 hrs Q 10.76 8.07 \.JMO 1.0 hrs Q 11.87(c) 11.87 Clerical 1.25 hrs Q 7.77(c) 9.71 1 hrs Q 7.77(0 7.77 .5 hr Q 7.77(z) 3.89 Recordi ng Secretary 3 hrs Q 10.25(c) 30.75 Graphics 1.5 hr Q 7.43(;) 11.15 1.5 hr Q 7.43(z) 11. 15 TOTAL $921.68 $248.37 $62.52 For SP's $921.68 x 26 = 23,963.68 ~ 85 = $281.93 plus other per i tern costs + 248.37 530.30 SUB-TOTAL FOR SP's + 62.52 592.82 SUB-TOTAL FOR ZMA's Add postage and advertising cost: TOTAL SP TOTAL ZMA ~'.''''''' . .. ..'~ 'J( "'i $ 530.30 ,,50.49 .- _~JJ~, $ 592.82 50.49 '643.31 . .. '.. 1':<'7,9;).-- County of Albemarle EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ~ITLE: Review of Development Related Fees AGENDA DATE: April 1, 1992 ITEM HUMBER: . cf.2,O<kJI. 2-7U SUBJBCT~PROPOSAL/REOUEST: Discuss~on of new fees for day care, home occupat~on and others as appropriate. STAFF CONTACTIS): Messrs. Tucker and Amelia Patterson ATTACHMENTS: ACTION: INFORMATION: x REVIEWED BY: BACKGROWm: The att~ched report responds to your request that staff review the recently adopted fees for small d~y care centers, home occupations and any others that may warrant reconsideration due to adve~se impact. RECOMMEJiDATION: None, p~ovided for Board information and discussion. 92.048 .. ~ . COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 2965823 MEMORANDUM TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors and~G FROM: v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning Community Development DATE: March 27, 1992 RE: Fees For Day Care Centers And Home Occupation - Class B Question has been raised as to the appropriateness of reducing fees for day care and home occupation special use permits. The new fees for these two permits are reflective of average actual cost to the County to conduct review of each type of permit, including staff review time, advertising, notifications, copying, etc. The average cost of home occupation class B's approved administratively has been estimated to be $30 while those reviewed by Planning Commission and Board has been estimated to be $560. The Planning Commission/Board review is necessary for home occupations where there is adjoining property owner opposition. The fee was approved for $350 regardless of whether it required administrative or Planning Commission/Board approval. This was to reflect an average between administrative and Planning Commission/Board review costs. I understand this was done to remove the possibility of fees influencing adjoining owner position on an application. Planning staff sees no public purpose met in lowering fees for home occupations. Review of such applications going to the Planning Commission/Board can be time consuming. Home occupations are typically for the proprietary interest of the applicant rather than a more general community service. Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Page 2 March 27, 1992 Day care special use permits were included in a group of commercial-like uses (schools and radio towers were others) that have an average cost of $780. Our experience is that the cost for day care review is slightly higher, primarily due to review for impacts in residential areas. The fee approved for day care was $780. Day care, although not explicitly addressed in any policy documents such as the Comprehensive Plan, is considered a community service type of activity in our review. Because of this community service characteristic, it may be justified to lower fees to less than cost. However, it should be noted that other community service types of special use permits, such as schools and churches, could justify a similar break. Alternatives for dealing with day care would be to increase the number of students allowed in a facility before it is subject to special use permit review or to remove the special use permit requirement for day care altogether. VWCjjcw cc: Amelia Patterson ,. . , " . I c I 1="" I'~- Ire.... ' , I '. Il:~~.l_.,..l~-. ~c::;.c,- ____-.:J I I I :-:Ia :- C ::-. 1 2, 1 9 9 ::: I 1 I ~~mbe~s 0= ~h_ Alberea:-le SOU~~l ~ Boa~e 0= Supe:-viso:-s ('10"-'-" n'::';:" ""e ,<..: ~ c.-~ --'r< V 1...4..........1...,:.............._ _v..__..... "'__"::) 4Pl XcInti:-e Road Cbarlottesville, VA 2290: I ~ra:- Sirs ane xadare: ~ It ~as come ~o rel a~~ent:on t~at in t~e :-us~ :0 :nc:-eaS2 p rm:~ tees last Dece~jer, the ~ee ~o= day care ce~:e~s was ~ isec f~om $165 to $780. c~is seems a ,iot,e S2o~t Sig~t2d rn . I I I ~c(... :::.. :'~- '::;';~ 2 ~~ -::. :::;,!""'.:":....;....~ 4"_~ __ ~~:< :;.. '-;- ;: _' , "-;r c r: E... ~-- -,":'" ..;..... 0. ~ . ~ - .___~_'4. ~ - ....- -. .... ..,.. L L:;'....J : ~, 0 ~~ -.,. ..:.... -..... - "- 3 2~t :0 We . , ... .. con~J..:li..:.all.y 'J 0 :. C 2: o:..:.r cc::cer:::: c.":;o~:' :he wel_ -bei:-~c ~- ..,.i.... . .. .... -". .. .' , . C.;.:~C.~2:: wnCS:2 pc.;:-e:-~:.s nl.:s: ~,.]or~': 011:.s:.c.e :'..~_e:r n.O!T'~es. :.~: ::. e :-~. ....~,-.-.:.,. i..-...Cj - ~" .... ~ :e a~~ :.~p~ove ~~e~~ e~~ca~:c~. ~ ach SC~80~ age W€ ?rov~Qe afte:-sc~oal prog~a~5 to kesp t2em v-ihy , the!:.. , , - ao ~J3 c.er:-.2.r:c. :~:.::- ~,u~d c: ~:esh ~~en ~t comes to provid~2g .. ,- - aespara~e~y neec ~o~e, ~8~ ~ess per~it :2e ~~a~a~~2es _255. ::; :l:' i. C. presc~oo~ C~~lC c~=e? ca~2 oppo~~~~:~ies, anc y.7 "- The new fee e~courages sco~=laws and :.s probably :.:,.enforceanle witho....::. i:.ring ::'.c~e inspec::ors. :::7::e :2.e sco~~ages ho~es~ people f:-o~ sett~~g up chile ca:-e b~s:~esses cause i~ ~akes the ~=ont end costs too hi~~. And ~o~st or a~_ :~:reases ~~e cost :c~ cons~~ers, gene~al~y ,~en at th~ begi~~ing 0= t~2i:- 2a~~~ng c~rve. sts wl~i s~re:y be passed O~ jy th2 provider. poc~ly pa~d young beca:..:se r.':...ese I .::I~ -,-fc. providers a~c the~r CU3~QmerS - 1 1 J _ S:tnce:-e~y, ~o-4._~.~ ~,. J "17 -' -. ., . _'_Ire:;, ',. ~::.- _elen~ I 1 I ?leass 100>:: ~- t~~s ~at~2r aga~n a~c ... -- -'. ca~ a::o=c ~:, b~~ ma~y, =ec:~ce th:..s , - _"1orre:-~:.cu.s r::he c o~:::. jl man:r pc:'c:-'..:.:.al ~-n"""'" r-o,-; V 0..............." .... . ---- " Edward H. Baih, Jr. Samuel Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. 5cottsville David P. Bow~rman Charlottesvil1~ Charles S Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors F~OM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC ,/pJ D~TE: June 9, 1992 SUBJECT: Supplement No. 65 to the Zoning Ordinance , Attached are new sheets to be inserted in your copy of the Zdning Ordinance. This supplement was occasioned by amendments I mqde on June 3, 1992. LElN:ec cq: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. George R. St. John Richard E. Huff, II Robert B. Brandenburger Peyton Robertson v. Wayne Cilimberg Amelia Patterson Clerk ~ 35.0 FEES Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made to the zoning administrator, the commission, or the board of supervisors shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth hereinafter, to defray the cost of processing such applica- tion. a. For a special use permit: 1. Mobile home - $35.00. 2. Rural area divisions - $990.00. 3. Commercial use - $780.00. 4. Industrial use - $810.00. 5. Private club/recreational facility - $810.00. 6. Mobile home park or subdivision - $780.00. 7. Public utilities - $810.00. 8. Grade/fill in the flood plain - $690.00. 9. Minor amendment to valid special use permit - $85.00. 10. Extending special use permits - $55.00. 11. Home Occupation-Class A - $10.00; Home Occupation-Class B - $350.00. 12. All other uses - $780.00. b. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance - $665.00. c. Amendment to the zoning map: 1. For planned developments - under 50 acres - $815.00. 2. For planned developments - 50 or more acres - $1,255.00. 3. For all other zoning map amendments - under 50 acres - $815.00. 4. For all other zoning map amendments - 50 or more acres - $1,255.00. 5. Minor amendment to a zoning map amendment - $175.00. d. Board of Zoning Appeals: 1. Request for a variance - $95.00. 2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals (including appeals of zoning administrator's decision) - $95.00, to be refunded if the decision of the zoning administrator is overturned. e. Preliminary site development plan: 1. Residential - $945.00, plus $10.00/unit. 2. Non-residential - $1,260.00, plus $10.00/1000 square feet. -229- (Supp. #64, 12-11-91) . - ~ . Edward H Ball1..Jr S",mul!i Mill(!~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R. Marshall. Jr Scollsville David P Bow~rman CharlotleSvillr , Charlotte Y Hlumphris Jack Jouett Charles S Martin Rivanna Walter F Perkins While Hall M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Board of Supervisors , F~OM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC /JnJ DATE: June 9, 1992 I I SijBJECT: Supplement No. 65 to the Zoning Ordinance , . : Attached are new sheets to be inserted in your copy of the z~ning Ordinance. This supplement was occasioned by amendments m~de on June 3, 1992. I , LEN:ec I , cq: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. George R. St. John Richard E. Huff, II Robert B. Brandenburger Peyton Robertson V. Wayne Cilimberg Amelia Patterson Clerk . ~ 35.0 . . . FEES Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made to the zoning administrator, the commission, or the board of supervisors shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth hereinafter, to defray the cost of processing such applica- tion. a. For a special use permit: 1. Mobile home - $35.00. 2. Rural area divisions - $990.00. 3. Commercial use - $780.00. 4. Industrial use - $810.00. 5. Private club/recreational facility - $810.00. 6. Mobile home park or subdivision - $780.00. 7. Public utilities - $810.00. 8. Grade/fill in the flood plain - $690.00. 9. Minor amendment to valid special use permit - $85.00. 10. Extending special use permits - $55.00. 11. Home Occupation-Class A - $10.00; Home Occupation-Class B - $350.00. 12. For day care centers - six (6) to nine (9) children - $390.00. (Added 6-3-92) 13~ For day care centers - ten (10) or more children - $780.00. (Added 6-3-92) 14. All other uses - $780.00. b. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance - $665.00. c. Amendment to the zoning map: 1. For planned developments - under 50 acres - $815.00. 2. For planned developments - 50 or more acres - $1,255.00. 3. For all other zoning map amendments - under 50 acres - $815.00. 4. For all other zoning map amendments - 50 or more acres - $1,255.00. 5. Minor amendment to a zoning map amendment - $175.00. d. Board of Zoning Appeals: 1. Request for a variance - $95.00. 2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals (including appeals of zoning administrator's decision) - $95.00, to be refunded if the decision of the zoning administrator is overturned. e. Preliminary site development plan: 1. Residential - $945.00, plus $10.00/unit. 2. Non-residential - $1,260.00, plus $10.00/1000 square feet. -229- (Supp. #65, 6-3-92) ." ~ . Edward H. Ba!n. Jr Sdmuel Mil1Jr David P. Bow~rman Charlotlesvillle I Charlotte Y Humphris Jack Jouett TO: , , F~OM: Dft.TE: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 304) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R. Marshall, Jr Scollsvdle Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins White Hall M E M 0 RAN DUM Board ot S'lpervisors Lettie E. leher, Clerk, CMC Jy June 9, 1932 , , SWBJECT: I Supplement No. 65 to the Zoning Ordinance , Attached are neN sheets to be inserted in your copy of the . Zqming Ordinance.. 'T'1is supplement was occasioned by amendments m4de on June 3, 199~. LEN:ec c~: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. George R. St. John Richard E. Huff, II Robert B. Brane'enburger Peyton Robert.scn V. Wayne CilimLerg Amelia Patterscn Clerk . ~ ~ . . . 35.0 FEES Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made to the zoning administrator, the commission, or the board of supervisors shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth hereinafter, to defray the cost of processing such applica- tion. a. For a special use permit: 1. Mobile home - $35.00. 2. Rural area divisions - $990.00. 3. Commercial use - $780.00. 4. Industrial use - $810.00. 5. Private club/recreational facility - $810.00. 6. Mobile home park or subdivision - $780.00. 7. Public utilities - $810.00. 8. Grade/fill in the flood plain - $690.00. 9. Minor amendment to valid special use permit - $85.00. 10. Extending special use permits - $55.00. 11. Home Occupation-Class A - $10.00; Home Occupation-Class B - $350.00. 12. For day care centers - six (6) to nine (9) children - $390.00. (Added 6-3-92) 13. For day care centers - ten (10) or more children - $780.00. (Added 6-3-92) 14. All other uses - $780.00. b. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance - $665.00. c. Amendment to the zoning map: 1. For planned developments - under 50 acres - $815.00. 2. For planned developments - 50 or more acres - $1,255.00. 3. For all other zoning map amendments - under 50 acres - $815.00. 4. For all other zoning map amendments - 50 or more acres - $1,255.00. 5. Minor amendment to a zoning map amendment - $175.00. d. Board of Zoning Appeals: 1. Request for a variance - $95.00. 2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals (including appeals of zoning administrator's decision) - $95.00, to be refunded if the decision of the zoning administrator is overturned. e. Preliminary site development plan: 1. Residential - $945.00, plus $10.00/unit. 2. Non-residential - $1,260.00, plus $10.00/1000 square feet. -229- (Supp. #65, 6-3-92) County of Albemarle EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITLE: CPA-92- 3 Community Facilities Plan County overnment Administration AGENDA DATE: June 3, 1992 ITEM NUMBER: -7;) tv ( 3 j I: 0 STAFF C Messrs. ACTION:-1l- INFORMATION: County of the CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes Huff REVIEWED BY: BACKGRO The Cou ty Government Administration section of the Community Facilities Plan is intended to supplem nt sections on Schools, Parks and Recreation, Police Department, Library Services, and Fir and Rescue Services already adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The purpose of each of these sections is to provide planning guidelines and general recommendations for items t be considered for facility development in each of these areas as they arise. ON: eeting on May 5, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the County nt Administration section of the plan. The version recommended to the Board by the Commission (Attachment A) is significantly different than the version as recommended that went to Public Hearing (Attachment B) in that all references to standards to have been deleted. The standard is one that is used in other sections of the Plan ly adopted and has been verified by Mr. Kirk Train, the architect who has completed ty's Master Plan Report for Office Space Needs as being consistent with planning s used industry wide. nt B also uses the standard to project net deficiencies to be used to conduct an needs assessment of office space, records retention, and storage needs into RECOMME Staff r include cons ide Governm ATION: commends that the Board consider whether the use of the standard is necessary to be in the amendment in order to be consistent with the other sections. Following this, ation, staff recommends that the section of the Community Facilities Plan on County nt Administration be adopted. 92.077 -'" /~._. r;~'~ ;. .~ - ?~. ::. :::;'i (c. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 2965823 i\ '.n MEMORANDUM '.' \. " ' TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive an~d)'G FROM: V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning Community Development DATE: May 11, 1992 CPA-92-03 Community Facilities Plan - County Government Administration RE: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on May 5, 1992, unanimously recommended amending the Community Facilities Plan to include the County Government Administration section. The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to hold a pUblic hearing on this item at its May 20, 1992 meeting. Following its public hearing the Planning Commission deleted and revised portions of this section as originally presented by staff. The major deletion was that of the square footage per employee standard. This figure represented a gauge to initially evaluate potential office space deficiency. without this standard, a needs assessment of current office space could not be conducted by staff and is not referenced in this report. Attached is a copy of the section approved by the Planning Commission (Attachment A) as well a copy of the section originally submitted by staff (Attachment B). It is my understanding that Rick Huff is considering presenting both the Planning Commission's recommended section and staff's public hearing version to the Board of Supervisors. SERVICE/FACILITY STRATEGIES The strategies below help ensure that the office space is available to meet the needs of County employees/public and is provided in a cost effective and efficient manner. 1. Office Space Needs: Conduct a detailed study of each department's space needs utilizing the Procedural Strategies in the following section. 2. Other Space Needs: Evaluate and determine ancillary space needs. The needs of the public and employees shall both be considered. Below is a list of possible ancillary features to meet public needs: - large meeting room/ auditorium - interior office meeting rooms - public area to review office material (files, plats, plans, etc.) - storage areas In addition, consideration should be given to ancillary space to meet employee needs. These should be representative of County personnel programs approved by the Board of Supervisors (i.e. day care, wellness programs, traffic reduction programs). 3. Additional Space: Needs may be met by one or more of four options: * Construct additional space at the existing ~entral site. * Provide satellite facilities in one or more highly populated Growth Areas of the County. * Lease nearby office space. * Purchase another building. 4. Off-site Facilities: When leasing, purchasing and/or constructing off-site office facilities, locate such facility on a major thoroughfare within a Growth Area. The building shall be clearly visible and easily accessible by automobile, bicycle, pedestrians, or mass transportation. Walkways directly connecting the parking areas to the building, bike paths, and bus stops shall be incorporated into the design of the 2 . I I I I building. Off-site signage shall be provided to assist the public in locating and gaining access to the facility. Appropriate screening and buffering shall be implemented. Factors such as building placement, traffic volumes and circulation, and surrounding structures shall be considered when locating to a 'new structure. 5. New Buildings (Existing Site): Any new buildings constructed on site shall have similar architectural characteristics as the existing building. These structures shall be independent of, but subordinate to the existing building. Design standards listed in item #3 of this section shall also apply to new buildings on the existing site. Multi-story building(s) should be considered for efficiency purposes. 6. Parking: Provide a minimum of 4.0 spaces for each 1000 square feet of gross space, plus an adequate area for all pool vehicles expected on the site. In the interest of serving the public, ample visitor parking shall be provided. In addition, overflow visitor parking areas should be provided as available on site. As an example, such overflow areas could be provided in a well drained flat field adjacent to the existing visitor parking area. parking shall meet the regulations established in the Zoning Ordinance for the city of Charlottesville or the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance (whichever applies to the site). 7. Bicycle Parking: Provide bicycle parking in a manner consistent with the recommendations of the "Bicycle Plan for the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County". PROCEDURAL STRATEGIES 1. Maximize Use of Existing Space: Maximize existing office space to the greatest extent possible. All alternatives to improve space efficiency such as a central filing system, microfilming of records, reducing furniture size, etc. shall be considered before additional space is deemed necessary. Before additional office space is deemed appropriate, an independent evaluation should be conducted to justify the need for new space. This should be accomplished by studying employee space and storage needs. If it is determined that a new facility is needed and cannot be provided for in existing space, the space that is vacated should be assigned a new user and renovation should take place if needed. When evaluating the cost of new construction, the cost of renovating vacated space should be considered. 3 2. Office Space Demand: Utilize the findings of an independent evaluation to determine if additional office space is required. 3. New Office Space Development: Before a new facility is constructed, analyze the costs vs. benefits of leasing or purchasing nearby office space in lieu of new construction. Those departments that function independently and are not closely related to other departments or are non-County departments shall be considered first for leased space. Also, the construction of government satellite facilities in high population centers within the County shall be considered for certain government functions. NEEDS ASSESSMENT The strategies as listed in this plan indicate a need to undertake a needs assessment of county government administrative space. .No such assessment has been undertaken as part of this plan. RECOMMENDATIONS * On an ongoing basis, provide office space need in a manner consistent with the Procedural Strategies. * If deemed necessary by the findings of an independent evaluation, provide altered and/or additional space in accordance with this assessment. 4 I ATTACHMENT BI STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: KENNETH BAKER APRIL 28, 1992 MAY 20, 1992 CPA-92-03 COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLAN--COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCTION The Albemarle County Office Building is the focal point for general governmental business in Albemarle County. As such, attention must be given to providing adequate space and establishing an environment which creates efficiency in operation and a sense of pride and ownership in local government for the people of Albemarle County. The County Building is currently overcrowded and has resulted in conditions that hinder employees in providing public services. SERVICE OBJECTIVES 1. Centralize government administrative services near population/employment centers in the City and/or in Growth Areas of the County to effectively provide efficient operations and convenient locations for the general public. 2. Provide a standard of office space per employee. Additional space needs may be met by one or more of four options: * Construct additional space at the existing central site. * Provide satellite facilities in one or more highly populated Growth Areas of the County. * Lease nearby office space. * Purchase another building(s) . 3. Provide ancillary space needs in conjunction with the provision of new space. 4. Provide additional space in accordance with need. Do not defer provision of new space to a point where unsatisfactory conditions exist. Maximize flexibility in space design to maximize opportunities to use/modify/expand/reduce internal space. 5. Evaluate existing space in the current building and eliminate inefficient design which may allow for additional office space. 1 6. Provide adequate space to allow departments that relate closely in responsibility and activities to locate in the same structure. within the structure, location of such departments should be primarily based on their operational inter-relationships to assure they can function efficiently and serve the public effectively. 7. Architecturally design any new facilities constructed on the existing site to be functionally and aesthetically complimentary to the existing structure. RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES I. SERVICE/FACILITY STANDARDS The standards below help ensure that the office space is available to meet the needs of County employees/public and is provided in a cost effective and efficient manner. 1. Office Space Needs: Provide 250 square feet net (315 square feet gross) of office space for each employee working in an office setting. This square foot figure should be a reference point for new and existing office space. This figure only represents a gauge to initially evaluate potential office space deficiency. However, it is realized because of economic and design constraints that this figure may not be possible to achieve in all cases. Before actual construction, purchasing or leasing decisions are made, a more detailed study by each department on space needs as outlined in the Procedural Standards below shall be undertaken to determine specific requirements. The detailed study will provide a better analysis of actual space needs. The net square foot figure indicated above accounts for the primary operating space and other secondary support office space required for use by any particular employee; this includes kitchen areas, storage areas, departmental conference rooms, and hallways within the department. Gross square footage is the total area of the building; this includes main hallways, walls, mechanical areas, bathrooms, elevator shafts etc. in addition to the net area. Due to the nature of public buildings and the various specialized functions that these structures support the provision for ancillary features such as large meeting rooms, recreational facilities, etc. are not included in this standard. Each new building should be reviewed on an individual basis and provisions made to provide the needed ancillary features. This is discussed in further detail in standard #2. 2 2. Other Space Needs: Evaluate and determine ancillary space needs for all new buildings prior to the development of construction plans. The needs of the public and employees shall both be considered. Also, because County operations are unique, adequate storage areas are required. Office space should not be used for bulk storage. Below is a list of possible ancillary features to meet public needs in conjunction with a new office building: - large meeting/ auditorium - interior office meeting rooms - public area to review office material (files, plats, plans, etc.) In addition, consideration should be given to ancillary space to meet employee needs. These should be representative of County personnel programs approved by the Board of Supervisors (i.e. day care, wellness programs, traffic reduction programs). 3. Off-site Facilities: When leasing, purchasing and/or constructing off-site office facilities, locate such facility on a major thoroughfare within a Growth Area. The building shall be clearly visible and easily accessible by automobile, bicycle, pedestrians, or mass transportation. Walkways directly connecting the parking areas to the building, bike paths, and bus stops shall be incorporated into the design of the building. Off-site signage shall be provided to assist the public in locating and gaining access to the facility. Appropriate screening and buffering shall be implemented. Factors such as building placement, traffic volumes and circulation, and surrounding structures shall be considered when locating a new structure. 4. New Buildings (Existing Site): Any new buildings constructed on site shall have similar architectural characteristics as the existing Duilding. These structures shall be independent of, but subordinate to the existing building. Design standards listed in item #3 of this section shall also apply to new buildings on the existing site. MUlti-story building(s) should be considered in lieu of single story building(s) for efficiency purposes. 5. Parking: Provide a minimum of 4.0 spaces for each 1000 square feet ,of gross space, plus an adequate parking 3 area for all pool vehicles expected on the site. In the interest of serving the public, ample visitor parking shall be provided. In addition, overflow visitor parking areas should be provided as available on site. As an example, such overflow areas could be provided in a well drained flat field adjacent to the existing visitor parking area. Parking shall meet the regulations established in the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Charlottesville or the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance (whichever applies to the site). Also, Bicycle parking should be provided in a manner consistent with the recommendations of the "Bicycle Plan for the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County." II. PROCEDURAL STANDARDS 1. Maximize Use of Existing Space: Maximize existing office space to the greatest extent possible. Before additional office space is deemed appropriate, independent Space Planners should justify the need for new space. This should be accomplished by studying employee space ~nd storage needs. Also, all alternatives to improve space efficiency such as a central filing system, microfilming of records, reducing furniture size, etc. shall be considered before additional space is deemed necessary. If demand is justified and it is determined that a new facility is needed and cannot be provided for in existing space, the space that is vacated should be assigned a new user and renovation should take place if needed. When evaluating the cost of new construction, the cost of renovating vacated space should be considered. 2. New Office Space Development: Before a new facility is constructed, analyze the costs vs. benefits of leasing or purchasing nearby office space in lieu of new construction. Those departments that function independently and are not closely related to other departments or are non-County departments shall be considered first for leased space. Also, the construction of government satellite facilities in high population centers within the County shall be considered for certain government functions. 4 I DEPARTMENT I I I I I I III. PRELIMINARY NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1990 EMPLOYEES FT/PT Alb. Co. se~ice Auth. Board of Su rvisors County Atto ney County Exec~tive Credit Unio~ EdJcation I Engineeringl I Finance Information Services Inspection MlJ"Iicipal B nd Parks & Recreation Persomel Planning/C . Dev. Police Department Registrar Social Ser ices Soil COny. ervice Staff Servi es USDA-ASCS I USDA-FHA I I Va. . Coop. E~t. Zoning I I TOTALS 21 4/1 N/A 7 1 53 10 45/3 16 19 1 17/111 14 15/5 84/10 2/3 51/6 511 14/2 2/1 5 10/11 8 404/154 CURRENT NSF 5,031 882 N/A 2,179 200 13,218 1,654 9,406 3,243 2,846 690 1,799 2,300 4,412 4,789 588 8,982 808 2,462 628 1,242 3,036 1,352 71,747 SPACE REQ. 1990 (BASED ON 250 NSFI EMPLOYEE) 5,250(21) 1,000(4)1 N/A 1,750(7) 250(1) 13,250(53) 2,500(10) 12,000(48) 4,000(16) 4,750(19) 250(1) 1,250(5)2 3,500(14) 5,000(20) 23,500(94) 750 (3) 14,250(57) 1,500(6) 1,500(6) 750(3)3 1,250(5) 5,250(21) 2,000(8) 105,500(422) DIFF. +1- (1990) -219 -118 N/A +429 -50 -32 -846 -2,594 -757 -1,904 +440 +549 -1,200 -588 -18,711 -162 -5,268 -692 +962 -122 -8 -2,214 -648 PROJECTED STAFF /2000# FT/PT SPACE REQ. 2000 (BASED ON 250 NSFI EMPLOYEE 30 4/1 6 8 1 64 15 50 20 22 1 19/111 17/2 18/3 125 4 58 6 18 3 5 12/2 11 7,500(30) 1,000(4) 1,500(6) 4 2,000(8) 250( 1) 16,000(64) 3,750(15) 12,500(50) 5,000(20) 5,500(22) 250( 1 ) 2,000(8) 5 4,750(19) 5,250(21) 31,250(125) 1,000(4) 14,500(58) 1,500(6) 1,750(7) 6 750(3) 1,250(5 ) 3,500(14) 2,750(11) [33,753]* 517/119 125,500(502) 1 Does not include 1 ~loyee at home. 2 Only 5 of the ~loyees listed work in the building. 3 Only staf assigned to office spaces have been included. 4 It is ex ted that the County Attorney's Office will move to the main bui ldi by the end of the decade. 5 Only 8 of the ~loyees are expected to work in the office. 6 Only 7 of the ~loyees are expected to work in the office. ( ) NllIber f ~loyees requiring office space. FT/PT - Full Time/Part Time Employees [ ]* Indic tes the estimated 1990 office space deficiency based on providing 250 NSF per Employee [ ]** Indi ates the projected 2000 office space deficiency based on providing 250 NSF per Employee # Project s aff for 2000 is based on a survey conduced by the County Executive's Office. 5 DIFF. + I - (2000) -2,469 - 118 -1,500 +179 50 -2,782 -2,096 -3,094 -1,757 -2,654 +440 -201 -2,450 -838 -26,461 -412 -5,518 -692 +712 -122 -8 -464 - 1 ,398 [53,753] ** J In 1990, there were 422 occupants requiring office space in the building. According to the staffing needs assessment conducted by the County Executive's Office, the building population could reach as many as 502 occupants by the end of the decade. The existing net area of the building is 71,747 square feet and using the recommended standard of providing 250 SF net per employee, an additional 33,753 SF net was needed in 1990 to accommodate the current building population. By the end of the decade, 125,500 SF net, or an additional 53,753 SF net, will be needed to accommodate the building population. The preliminary needs assessment indicates that, in 1990, the Police Department was deficient 18,711 SF net and it is projected by 2000 that this department will be deficient 26,461 SF net. Office space for the Police Department is the bulk of the new space needed. By the end of the decade all other departments, excluding Police, will require an additional net area of 27,292 SF. Therefore, the Police Department space needs represent approximately 49% of the needed square footage by 2000. Further analysis indicates that the Social Services, Finance and Inspections Departments are experiencing a substantial deficiency in office space. The Social Services Department has a current office space deficiency of 5,268 SF net and the Finance and Inspection Departments have a current office space deficiency of 2,594 SF net and 1,904 SF net, respectively. The Virginia Cooperative Extension Office has a current office space deficiency of 2,214 SF net; however, it is expected that their part-time work force will decrease during the next few years, thereby decreasing office space demand. Also, by 2000 if new office space is not provided, it is projected that 20 of the 23 departments will be deficient in office space and 8 of the 23 departments will be deficient by at least 2,000 square feet net. RECOMMENDATIONS * If deemed appropriate, provide additional office space either through leasing, purchasing, or construction of a new building. If future additional space is provided, the existing office building should be reconfigured as necessary to accommodate anticipated office space demand of remaining departments. If additional office space is provided at the existing site, a master plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors shall be utilized as a guideline for siting, designing, and landscaping new buildings. 6 * Subject to review, retain the Police Headquarters at the County Office Building site with the provision of additional space needs to address the current deficiency as a high priority. All possible options to satisfy the department's space needs should be reviewed. The Police Department section of this Plan recommends at least one police substation be built as part of a government satellite facility (page 13). A substation is included in the 1992-97 adopted CIP for planned funding in 1993-94 (design) and 1995-96 (construction). Construction of a substation will provide some relief for the headquarters space. Additional possibilities include the following: 1) utilize space in the existing building that would be available after certain departments are moved to a new ,building location; and 2) construct a new building to house police operations on the existing office building complex site. * Make the provision of additional office space for the Social service, Finance, and Inspections Departments the highest priority. 7 .1 I D~TE \.-l,u ::f /ff;~ /' I A~ENDA ITEM NO. 9';-.,{. () ~tl:;' ~J(Pl A~ENDA ITEM NAME /1 /l~ 11.) tv.. il ; /ltJ7dl! r;( ,!:>eel-, ,;<./- 2- , I ') ItC:1 "h / v / /f~2 /c,/ J J4-/.n D~ UNTIL lh / I .j / Form.3 7/25/86 . " II i ( ~ . C'-', \ i ~, ~,~) t, ,~~j I ~"',/~ =orrest R Marshall. Jr Scottsville I Edward H Balm. Jr Samuel Miller: , David P Bowetman I CharlottesvillE! , Charlotte Y. HtmphriS Jack Jouett I I I I COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martm Riv'anna Walter F Perkms White Hall M E M 0 RAN DUM TOI: I I FRbM: I I I DA'fl'E: I I SU~JECT: I I I Bruce Woodzell, County Assessor Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~~ June 9, 1992 Agricultural/Forestal District Advisory Committee I At the Board of Supervisors meeting on June 3, 1992, you were appointed to the Agricultural/Forestal District Advisory Co~i ttee. This appointment was occasioned by an amendment to th~ Code of Virginia which requires the appointment of a tenth me~er to the Committee. Future correspondence and notification of: meetings will be coming from the Planning Department. I , LEN:ec I I I V. Wayne Cilimberg The Honorable James L. Camblos, III - , ( , ;L ..f. -:-~ -;~ ;:: '"" /~. County of Albemarle EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA !fITLE: Whitewo~d Road Park Committee Report AGENDA D~~E: June 3, 1 92 ITEM NUMBER: (}C' 1/ Ii./, :3 / L ./.. //1;" :;i I~" / /." ~,' 7, /t:] INFORMATION: SUBJECT(PROPOSAL/REOUEST: Whitewo~d Road Park Committee is submitting the attached report to serve as the master plan fot the development of the 22.7 acre property located on Whitewood Road. Approva~ of the proposed master plan is request~d in order to move forward with the project. ACTION:--1L- CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes STAFF C~NTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff. REVIEWED BY: -- BACKGROtftm: On Febr~ary 13, 1991, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors appointed the Whitewood Road Park Committee consisting of neighborhood representatives, County staff, elected Board membersiand a landscape architect. The Committee was tasked with developing a master plan proposal for the usage of the Whitewood Road property. The attached report recommends a passiveirecreation approach for the property which will preserve its value as greenspace. The pla~ has been found to be in compliance with the County's Comprehensive Plan by the Planning Commission and now awaits review and approval by the Board of Supervisors. RECOMME~ATION: Staff r~commends that the Park Committee's recommendations be accepted and the Master Plan approve4 for implementation as funding is available. 92.063 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Parks and Recreation Department County Office Building 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 Telpphone (804) 296-5845 MEMORANDUM ijO: Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive ~OM: Patrick K. Mullaney, Director, Parks & RecreationllJ/i1J.( DATE: April 16, 1992 lij:!: : Whitewood Road Park Committee Report On February 13, 1991, the Board of Supervisors appointed the Whitewood Road Park Committee. The primary charge of the Committee w~s to develop a Master Plan for the County owned park property on Whitewood Road. On behalf of the Whitewood Road Park Committee, I am very pleased to present the enclosed report on the Whitewood Forest Master Plan. The Master Plan was presented to the Planning Commission on March 17, 1992, and was found to be in compliance with the Cbmprehensive Plan. The final step in the Master Plan process is approval of the plan by the Board of Supervisors. Your assistance in placing this item on the Board's agenda is appreciated. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let me know. PKM/sms Enclosure -- ,- Whitewood Forest Master Plan Report Planning Commission: March 17, 1992 Purpose: The purpose of this report is to describe the proposed master plan for the 22.7 acre County owned park property on Whitewood Road. The plan is being recommended by the Whitewood Road Park Committee. The Committee was appointed by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors and charged with this task. Committee members include: David Bowerman, Charlotte Humphris, Robert Cooper, Sally Whaley, Thomas Jakubowski, Ron Ervin, Virginia Gardner, Ernest Flynn, Joan Branscome, Betty Via, Dennis Rosencrance, Betina Ring, Jo Higgins, David Benish, Marcia Joseph, Sharn Perry and Pat Mullaney. History: In 1919 the Albemarle County School Board purchased a 22.4 acre parcel df property that combined with a small land exchange in 1971 forms the current 22.7 acre Whitewood Road property. Until recently the property was held in ~eserve by the School Board due to its potential as a future school site. Because it represented a large tract of public land in an area planned for high density development, its value as a future recreational site was recognized and in 1982 the property was designated "Public Recreation Area" in the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan. About that time the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors asked the County staff to develop a plan to make interim recreation uise of the property while its future as a potential school site was being decided. In 1984 permission was granted by the School Board and funds were appropriated by the Board of Supervisors for the Parks and Recreation Department tb develop the present day jogging trail on the property. Any additional recreational development was delayed until a decision was made on the ultimate dlsposition of the property. As the area surrounding the property continued to develop as anticipated, the importance of preserving the area as greenspace increased. In 1989 a consultant was hired to evaluate six potential sites for a new urban area elementary school. The consultant found that the Whitewood Road site was the most well suited for that purpose. However, because the construction of a school facility would drastically reduce the greenspace in that highly developed area, the Board of Supervisors decided to preserve the property for a park. On February 13, 1991, the Board appointed the Whitewood Road Park Committee. Membership on the Committee includes representatives of the various neighborhoods surrounding the property, County staff representing the Department of Planning, Engineering and Parks and Recreation, two Board of Supervisor members and a landscape architect. One of the primary charges of the Committee was to develop a master plan for the park. The Committee reached a consensus at its first meeting that construction of active recreational facilities such as ballfields, playgrounds, hardcourt areas and the related support facilities, would defeat the very purpose of not using the property for a school site. Recognizing then the value of preserving this greenspace in as close to its natural state as possible, the Committee set out to develop a plan to make the property a more inviting and safer place to pursue more passive recreation activities while still preserving its existing character. Master Plan Development: The first draft of the master plan was developed after a site visit and several meetings by the Whitewood Road Committee. Along with the first draft of the master plan, the name Whitewood Forest was unanimously endorsed by the Committee to be suggested to the Board of Supervisors for the park. At four public meetings the draft plan was presented to the residents of Townwood, Wynridge, Minor Hill, Oak Forest, Birnam Woods, Camelia Gardens, Garden Court and Whitewood Village. A total of approximately fifty persons attended the public meetings and unanimously endorsed the plan. To date, one negative comment has been received from a resident who would like to see the property remain in its current state. ~fter receiving the public comments, the Committee finalized the park master p:lan. Master Plan Narrative: The park master plan shows two major site constraints. One is the extension of Greenbrier Drive, which encroaches approximately 80' w~thin the park property lines, and the other is the location of a regional detention basin. These items are not part of the park plan, but rather existing ehcumbrances on the property that the Committee had to plan around. The site for Greenbrier Drive is set, however the Committee is recommending a location for the detention basin that will have the least impact on the park. A,major concern about the current condition of the park that is addressed in the plan, is the abundance of undergrowth throughout the woods. This restricts the v~sual contact within some areas of the trail and creates a concern for the safety of park users. Because the Committee needed to balance the need for security with the desire to limit clearing as much as possible, it was decided tQ limit activity areas to those areas being cleared for security. To address the security issue it is proposed to open up the views from Whitewood Road, Greenbrier Road Extension, and within the interior trails. To accomplish this sQme trees may be removed in the front of the property facing Whitewood Road and along the side facing the Greenbrier Road Extension. In addition, it is proposed t~at much of the underbrush within the interior trails be removed to allow visibility along the length of the trails. To further allow the interior of the park to give a feeling of security, the trails have been linked in some areas. T~is allows a much longer trail, and provides additional visual interest, and an ifl-crease in the visibility along the length of the trails. The necessary structures such as exercise station, picnic tables and benches fqr such activities as running, walking, exercising, resting, sketching, bird wqtching, etc., are shown included in these areas. There has been no provision made for on site parking. With the significant p~operty already being disturbed by the road extension and the detention basin, tHe Committee unanimously rejected the idea of additional clearing and grading for on site parking. With the intention that the park serve a neighborhood f~nction, and the lack of any special facility to act as an attraction, the need fdr parking is expected to be minimal. There was no desire for on site parking e~ressed at the public meetings, and the County Zoning Administrator has determined that parking is not necessary on this site. Recognizing that some residents may prefer the availability of convenient parking, the Committee is i~vestigating if any arrangements can be made with the adjacent Sachem Village. One other item of discussion has been the type of surfacing for the park trails. The current trails are rock dust with paving in high erosion areas. The " Committee originally recommended paving the new trails to reduce maintenance. At each of the public meetings those in attendance preferred the rock dust surface. At this point the Committee is recommending rock dust with the money saved to be used for increased erosion control measures. The Department of Parks and Recreation has asked the Independence Resource Center to issue an opinion on the handicapped accessibility of rock dust. The final decision on the ~ype of s'urfacing will be based on that opinion. ~inally, it was one of the Committee's goals to inspire neighborhood pride and c:are for the park from within the community. To achieve this it is suggested that appropriate entrance with a sign and low maintenance plant material be designed. The Committee will also be investigating areas to make direct neighborhood accesses. In addition, it is hoped that the various neighborhoods surrounding the park would adopt the different modules that have been created by the linking of the park trails. Budget: The cost estimate for the Whitewood Forest Project is $41,000. There has already been an appropriation of $10,000 for the master plan. Through the wprk of the Committee, especially landscape architect Marcia Joseph, the master plan was produced at no cost. An additional $20,000 is included in the 92-93 Capital Improvement Budget. Committee members will try to supplement the cpmmitted County funds with additional resources solicited from private sources. II I I I '-TE ,J (,l A.jJ --;?, /792- D / I A t;ENnA q J C / . :2 :l; 70 ITEM NO. c . . (LX" .~ . A GENnA ITEM NAME SULa{jyci Pia" - 11'/ fv \CVV)'us D I:&Il: UNTIL ~J^/y I J / 9 9 2- Form. 3 7/25/86 . '. ...:...., ; ')- _;< -' c:::;,2. County of Albemarle EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA tITLE: Illegal! Trash Dumping AGENDA DATE: June 3, 1992 ITEM NUMBER: ?~.? tr;:,~ -;3. .3'/ / ACTION: INFORMATION:~ SUBJEC~PROPOSAL/REOUEST: Scope df problem and possible mitigating measurel:i. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: I STAFF C~NTACT(S): Mr. T~cker, Mr. patters4>n ATTACHMENTS: 1 Brandenburger, Ms. /J~- REVIEWED BY: ~ BACKGR01nm: Illegal! trash dumping has been a longstanding problem throughout the nation. It has been a problem I of moderate degree within the County, even before tipping fees were imposed. There has beeh some increase in the number of complaints reported to this Office since the date tipping I fees began in February, 1991. Most of this dumping has occurred at sites that pre- date th~ tipping fees. The majority of material found in dump sites involves white goods (appliapces, etc), furniture and tires. Of the 36 known dump sites, 31 pre-date the implemeptation of tipping fees and 4 of these are the largest sites. , The coufty Police Department enforces what is commonly known as littering from a vehicle. The Zon ng Department enforces the "trash ordinance," Section 16-5 of the County Code. This prohibi s any owner or occupant to "store, accumulate or dump any refuse, trash, rubbish or any othir waste material or substance on such premises in such quantities or in such a manner or for uch a period of time as to constitute a nuisance or as to be injurious to the health or safe y of the public, or potentially injurious to the health or safety of the public." ! DISCUSS~: Illegal, trash dumping is an activity which is extremely difficult to suppress through enforce~ent measures. It is commonly done surreptitiously, in the dark of night or in areas which ate not easily observable. Often the property ownership is either an absentee owner, unresolved, or multiple owners, as with an estate. In almost every case, the property owner is not taking part in the illegal dumping. Usually the property is undeveloped or vacated. Often tre owner has attempted to have the property cleaned up and the dumping stopped. I Typical~y any given illegal dump is the product of trash from multiple sources. Many of these s~urces would chose to dump their trash illegally instead of disposing of it properly, whether! or not there were tipping fees. The manpower necessary to stake out these multiple problem! areas to apprehend multiple violators is not available. Staff i~' currently in the process of conducting an inventory of dump sites with information as to t eir ownership, the general size, whether it is old or new, active or inactive, and the typ s of materials dumped. Each site is being analyzed to determine what measures can be taken to prevent future dumping. For example, in the case of an access road, we are providing the owners some specifications of posts with cable to block access. We are also discuss~ng the issue with other localities to determine what measures they ~ave found to be successful in enforcement, prevention and clean-up. I I In addi~ion, we are working with various groups who would like to provide the community service I of dump site Clean-ups. These will be opportunities to obtain an agreement from the property owner for future abatement measures, prior to agreeing to clean-up. Some localities have pr~vided a subsidy to clean-up efforts in the form of paying half or all of the tipping fees, Of providing the truck and some manpower. An example of such efforts was the cleanup I , I Illegal Trash Dumping June 2, 1992 Page 2 of two ~ites on May 16th by the Jefferson Waste Hauler's Association which resulted in 22.58 tons of I material being removed during a three hour period at a cost to the County of $740 in subsidized tip fees. RECOMME\mATION: While v~gorous and well-publicized enforcement efforts are important, they have limited deterrence. Efforts to increase public awareness of convenient disposal and the hazards of unapproved dumping, as well as a solicitation for assistance in apprehending offenders, are essential solutions. I staff recommends the following: (1) Awa~eness At Provide public service announcements which explain the hazards of dumping, a*d request assistance in apprehending offenders. Bt Provide public information regarding agencies who will take used and usable f~rniture and appliances. C. Provide handouts with the specifications for blocking off an access road and otherwise assist property owners in controlling access. (2) Assistance A. Work with the VDOT in identifying those roadways which should be targeted for a$signment to a responsible group for the adopt-a-highway program. B, Work with Virginia Power for installation of security lighting, if available. C. Coordinate clean-ups. D. Provide subsidy of the tip fee for initial cleanup of illegal dump sites. R~curring cleanup of sites will be at the owner's expense. A condition of subsidizing t~e tip fee will require property owners to take measures to prevent further access to t~e dump area. (3) EnfCl>rcement A. Use of the crime watchers/neighborhood watch program for information regarding illegal dumping. This will include those County agencies involved in field work, as well as the Cable Company, Centel, Virginia Power and others. B~ Creating a network of contacts with other interested parties for information. C~ Maintain a cooperative effort towards enforcement with Police Officers in the f~eld, to monitor problem sites. D~ Responsibility for removal of illegally dumped material is the property owner(s). P~st efforts to enforce cleanup has met with marginal success. A new enforcement p~ogram to carry out County Code Section 16-5 (Attachment A) and managed by the County Autorney's Office is proposed as follows: - Notification of property owners of their responsibility to remove material with a reasonable period of time, such as 90 days, during which the County will assist with subsidy of the tip fee if it is an Illegal Trash Dumping June 3, 1992 Page 3 initial cleanup. owner (s) . All other costs associated with cleanup are the property If cleanup is not completed within the specified period, the County Attorney will obtain the necessary authorization for the County to clean up the material. Costs incurred will be collected from the property owner by a tax or levy to be added to the property tax for collection during the next billing cycle. The pr~vention of illegal trash dumping partly depends on the convenience of proper trash disposal. Therefore, it is a part of the larger issue of solid waste disposal, including recyclilng. 92.068 ATTACHMENT A AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT CHAPTER 16 OF THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE ENTITLED "REFUSE AND GARBAGE" OF ARTICLE I. SECTION 16-5 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors 'of Albemarle County. Virginia. that the Code of Albemarle County be and is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: 'It * * * 'It Secl. 16-5. Removal of Trash. Garbage. Refuse, Etc. It shall be unlawful for any owner or occupant of any property in Albemarle Co~nty to store. accumulate or dump any refuse. trash, rubbish or any other waste ma~erial or substance on such premises in such quantities or in snch a manner or for sudh a period of time as to constitute a nuisance or as to be injurious to the health or isafety of the public, or potentially injurious to the health or safety of the pu~lic. All garbage shall be placed in water-tight containers and be kept covered un~il transported to a public sanitary landfill or until taken from the premises by tr~sh or garbage collectors or otherwise disposed of as provided by law. The owner or owners of any property in Albemarle County shall. at such time or ti~es as the governing body or its agent may prescribe, remove from such property any an~ all trash, garbage, refuse, litter and other substances which might endanger the heailth or safety of other residents of the County; and whenever the governing body I de~s it necessary, after reasonable notice, the governing body or its agent may have sudh trash, garbage, refuse, litter or other substances which might endanger the heailth of other residents of the County, removed by the County's own agents or empiloyees, in which the cost or expense thereof shall be chargeable to and paid by thei owners of such property and may be collected by the County as taxes and levies arei collected; . And, be it ordained, that this ordinance shall be effective on and after January 1, 11990. For State law as to authority of the County to enact this ordinance, see Virgin- ia Code section 15.1-11. * * * * * I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, cor~ect copy of an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Vir~inia, at a regular meeting held on November 15, 1989. , I I . Edward H. Bai , Jr. Samuel Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville David P. Bowe man Charlottesvill Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. H mphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall MEMORANDUM TO Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CH~ June 4, 1992 Board Actions of JunG 3, 1992 At the Board of Supervisors meeting on June 3, 1992, the Board took the fo lowing actions on requests for appropriations: a. Appropriation: Carl Perkins Vocational Education Grant. APPROVED th appropriation of $92,486 received from the Carl Perkins Vocational Educa- ti n Grant. Attached is the signed appropriation form. b. Appropriation: $10,000 received from ropriation form. Dare Program Grant. APPROVED the appropriation the Dare Program Grant. Attached is the signed c. Appropriation: Reimbursement - Manville Property Damage Settlement st. APPROVED the appropriation of $12,169 received as a reimbursement m Manville Property Damage Settlement Trust. Attached is the signed ropriation form. :ec At achments (3) cc Roxanne White Richard E. Huff, II Robert W. Paskel Tracy Holt , APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 91/92 NUMBER 910052 I TYPE pF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW X I I ADVER~ISEMENT REQUIRED ? I I I FUND! I ! PURPO~E OF APPROPRIATION: CARL pERKINS VOCATIONAL EDUCATION GRANT I E PENDITURE COST ENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ***** ****************************************************************** 1173115000 SALARIES-CLERICAL $8,567.00 1173210000 FICA 655.00 1173221000 VSRS 1,086.00 1173231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 513.00 1173232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 30.00 1173580500 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 1,540.00 1173601300 INSTRUCTIONAL/RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES 300.00 1173601600 DATA PROCESSING SUPPLIES 7,740.00 1173800100 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 11,445.00 12116 1183112100 SALARIES-TEACHER 15,138.00 12116i1183138100 PART-TIME WAGES-WORK STUDY 10,000.00 12116 1183210000 FICA 1,950.00 12116 1183221000 VSRS 1,920.00 12116 1183231000 HEALTH INSURANCE 513.00 12116 1183232000 DENTAL INSURANCE 30.00 12116~1183520301 TELEPHONE-LOCAL 300.00 12116~1183601200 BOOKS & SUBSCRIPTIONS 135.00 1211611183601300 INSTRUCTIONAL/RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES 13,143.00 12116 1183601600 DATA PROCESSING SUPPLIES 1,650.00 12116 1183800100 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 11,500.00 1211611183800200 FURNITURE/FIXTURES 150.00 12116 1163800100 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 3,084.00 12116 1313550100 TRAVEL-MELEAGE 128.00 12116~1313800100 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 969.00 : TOTAL $92,486.00 I I ~'REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ***** ****************************************************************** 22000 3000330107 CARL PERKINS GRANT. $92,486.00 I I , I I I *****~****************************************************************** I I I REQUE~TING COST CENTER: YES NO X SCHOOL TOTAL $92,486.00 I I APPRO\fALS: EDUCATION I I DIREC~OR OF FINANCE I I I BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SIGNATURE $Z~ DATE ~/.9-7 Z- /~~j?~ (. "".,,,........: :". c.,'..,", ,,'.: _ dgenda ikfn ;'/.J, ~':~:_; .~:_~~)___:?_7 2.. \".' - ,_:,.(- ~/ ,~ '.) ,..2.. ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FY 1991-92 APPROPRIATION REQUEST Carl Perkins Grant The Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology ~ducation Act of 1990 provides federal assistance for secondary, postsecondary, and adult vocational programs with emphasis on '~special populations" (ie. students with handicaps, ~ducationally and economically disadvantaged, and individuals ~ith limited English proficiency). Albemarle County Schools has ~een awarded a Carl Perkins grant in the amount of $92,486.00 for ~he 1991-92 school year. The money will be used in the following ~ays: (1) expanding existing programs to provide enhancement of skills identified by employers as necessary for success, (2) ~mproving and generating access to vocational programs by qisabled and disadvantaged students, and (3) improving and ~pdating equipment, materials, and curriculum. The funds will be ~eceived and disbursed as follows: qARL PERKINS VOCATIONAL EDUCATION GRANT (Disadvantaged) ~xpenditure: ]-2116-61173-115000 I ~-2116-61173-210000 ]-2116-61173-221000 X-2116-61173-231000 I ~-2116-61173-232000 ]-2116-61173-580500 ]-2116-61173-601300 ~-2116-61173-601600 ]-2116-61173-800100 Salaries - Office Clerical FICA VSRS Health Insurance Dental Insurance Staff Development Instructional/Recreational Data Processing Supplies Machinery & Equipment $ 8,567.00 655.00 1,086.00 513.00 30.00 1,540.00 Supplies 300.00 7,740.00 11. 445.00 $31,876.00 dARL PERKINS VOCATIONAL EDUCATION GRANT (Handicapped) I ~xpenditure: ]-2116-61183-112100 ~-2116-61183-138100 ]-2116-61183-210000 t-2116-61183-221000 ~-2116-61183-231000 ]-2116-61183-232000 t-2116-61183-520301 ~-2116-61183-601200 ]-2116-61183-601300 ~-2116-61183-601600 ~-2116-61183-800100 ]-2116-61183-800200 Salaries - Teacher Part-Time Wages - Work Study FICA VSRS Health Insurance Dental Insurance Telephone - Local Books & Subscriptions Instruct/Recreational Supplies Data Processing Supplies Machinery & Equipment Furniture/Fixtures $15,138.00 10,000.00 1,950.00 1,920.00 513.00 30.00 300.00 135.00 13,143.00 1,650.00 11,500.00 150.00 $56,429.00 . CARL PERKINS GRANT (CONTINUED) ~ARL PERKINS VOCATIONAL EDUCATION GRANT (Consumer Homemaking) I ~x~enditure: ]-2116-61163-800100 Machinery & Equipment $ 3.084.00 $ 3,084.00 dARL PERKINS VOCATIONAL EDUCATION GRANT (Administration) I x enditure: -2116-61313-550100 ~-2116-61313-800100 , I Travel - Mileage Machinery & Equipment $ 128.00 969.00 $ 1,097.00 TOTAL $92,486.00 I EVENUE: -2000-33000-330107 Carl Perkins - Voc. Ed. $92.486.00 TOTAL $92,486.00 ~--- APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR , 91/92 NUMBER 910054 TYPE PF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW X ADVE~ISEMENT REQUIRED ? I , YES NO X I FUND I DARE PURPO~E OF APPROPRIATION: DARE rROGRAM GRANT E PENDITURE COST ENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1310761101160300 STIPENDS STAFF/CUR. DEV $2,500.00 1310761101210000 FICA 195.00 1310761101601300 INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 3,300.00 1310761101550400 TRAVEL-EDUCATION 1,870.00 1310761101580000 MISCELLANEOUS 2,135.00 $10,000.00 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT *****~****************************************************************** 23107~4000240500 GRANT REVENUE-STATE $10,000.00 TOTAL TOTAL $10,000.00 *****~****************************************************************** REQUEfTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION , APPROYALS: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE , BOARD'OF SUPERVISORS SIGNATURE ~.;;~ DATE .5-/;9-)92 t?~)? .;--- FISCAL YEAR TYPE OF APPROPRIATION 91/92 ADVER~ISEMENT REQUIRED ? , FUND APPROPRIATION REQUEST NUMBER 910053 ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW X YES NO X SCHOOL PURPOpE OF APPROPRIATION: REIMBURSEMENT FOR MANVILLE PROPERTY DAMAGE SETTLEMENT TRUST. I I EkPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ I 12433~2420600000 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES $12,169.00 I TOTAL $12,169.00 IREVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT *****~****************************************************************** 22000~8000189903 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES $12,169.00 TOTAL $12,169.00 ******~***************************************************************** I REQUES~ING COST CENTER: APPROV)\LS: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS EDUCATION SIGNATURE DATE ~~ .q-:.../ Y- 7' "Z... ?~/2- ;...<(. - '.;"'" : ~;~ ! ~ I '; I '1 ;;(_,(., ('( .~~? ~~, 13 /'., ':' ...., / "",',:,-:r ,1 (.1 </ ..,;;0( f.. ~';. . 7 ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FY 1991-92 APPROPRIATION REQUEST Reimbursement - Manville Propertv Damaae Settlement Trust Albemarle County Public Schools has received a reimbursement dheck for $12,169.00 from Manville Property Damage Settlement ~rust. The payment reimburses Albemarle County for a portion of ~he labor and supplies the Department of Building Services qtilized during the 1991-92 fiscal year to remove asbestos ~aterial from Albemarle High School, Brownsville Elementary, ~irginia L. Murray Elementary, and Woodbrook Elementary. The ~unds will be received and disbursed as follows: evenue: ,-2000-18000-189903 Miscellaneous Revenues ~xDenditure: ~-2433-62420-600000 Materials & Supplies $12,169.00 $12,169.00 DARE Proaram Grant , Albemarle County Public Schools has been awarded a $10,000.00 grant to enhance the existing Albemarle County DARE Brogram by providing parents information and resources on ~ubstance abuse issues. The staff is participating at school ~unctions that parents attend, speaking to parent groups, and ~argeting parents with updated information on substance abuse ~opics. The funds will be received and disbursed as follows: I , ~evenue: 21-3107-24000-240500 Grant Revenue - State $10,000.00 ~xDenditure: 1-3107-61101-160300 Stipends Staff/Cur. Dev. 11-3107-61101-210000 FICA , , $ 2,500.00 $ 195.00 $ 3,300.00 $ 1,870.00 $ 2.135.00 $10,000.00 11-3107-61101-601300 Instructional Supplies ~-3107-61101-550400 Travel - Education ~-3107-61101-580000 Miscellaneous ,- ,.-- /5'c U I ~ ,,( 0/~/f?-2> ALBEMARLE COUN1Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS Memorandum T~: Carole A. Hastings, Acting Superintendent , F~OM: Tracy L.S. Holt, Director, Fiscal servic~~ ~: School Division Carry-over Funds DATE: June 3, 1992 I As you recall, the Board of Supervisors approved the School Bbard's request for the reappropriation of the FY 1990-91 School ~nd balance in November 1991. The $189,567 was reallocated to the schools that ended the fiscal year with a positive balance, while the schools that ended the year with a negative balance did npt receive additional funds. Since this reappropriation request was approved, discussions r~garding future reappropriations have emerged. The task force op school-based allocations recommended surplus funds be reappropriated the next fiscal year. In addition, the financial m~nagement policy revision committee discussed various policies a~sociated with carry-over funds. The School Board has also irdicated interest in pursuing the idea. Therefore, on behalf of the School Division, I would like to request permission for the School Division to have its ending f~scal year fund balance reappropriated on a pro-rated basis to tpose individual cost centers that end the fiscal year with a pbsitive balance. I \['LSH I I xc: I Members of the School Board Members of Board of Supervisors ~ ~ .:~-- ,;,< 9 - ~--L i.! , \.'1 r" t L ALBEMARLE COUN1Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS Memorandum F~OM: RE: Carole A. Tucker, County Ex~cutive n / ~ Hastings, Acting superintendent~~ TO: Robert w. DiATE: Request For Appropriation April 29, 1992 At its meeting on April 27, 1991, the School Board accepted the Carl Perkins Grant, the DARE Program Grant, and also received a: reimbursement check from Manville Property Damage Settlement T~ust. The attachments display background information on these grants and the requested revenue and expenditure appropriations. I 1 It is requested the Board of Supervisors amend the a~propriation ordinance to receive and disburse these funds as r!equested. If you have any questions, please contact me or Tracy aolt. Thank You. /rrLSH Aittachments ~c: Melvin Breeden Lettie Neher Tracy Holt David p, Bow rman Charlottesvill COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Edward H, Ba n, JL Samuel Mill Charlotte y, umphris Jack Jouett MEMORANDUM All Department Heads/Agencies , ~~. ~ Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~~ ~~ June 8, 1992 1992-93 Appropriation Ordinance Forrest R Marshall, JL Scottsville Charles S, Martin Rivanna Walter F, Perkins White Hall Attached is a copy of the Appropriation Ordinance for Fiscal Year 1992-93 adopted by the Board of Supervisors on June 3, 1992. :ec At achment cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. Richard E. Huff, II Robert B. Brandenburger Roxanne White James Heilman Melvin Breeden Fred Kruger George R. St. John Carole Hastings Theresa Tapscott Charley Goodman Ken Ackerman Bonny Davies v. Wayne Cilimberg Nancy O'Brien Helen Poore Gordon Yager J. W. Peyton Robertson, Jr. Amelia Patterson Taylor Williams Iilene Railton James R. Peterson Jerry B. Layman Susan L. McLeod Gordon Walker Linda Wilson Ed Wayland Liz Courain Alan Segar Brent A. Cool Cathy Bodkin Mary-Carter Lominack Annette G. Grimm Karen L. Morris Alicia Lugo Jewel King Emily Dreyfus Rory Carpenter Jean Easton Shelby J. Marshall James L. eamblos, III Sterling Hudson D. D. Hudson Terry W. Hawkins Donna Selle Connie Porter Patrick K. Mullaney Cat Maguire Peppy Linden Bobbye Cochran ,John Hood Paul D. McWhinney Peggy Duncan Julian Taliaferro Mike Schlemmer Jesse R. Hurt Wayne Campagna Bennie L. Hildebrand Patricia Smith John F. Miller Barbara R. McGill Brenda Barbour Jo Higgins Al Waugaman Robert W. Paskel Tracy Holt ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993 AN ORDINANCE making appropriations of sums of money for all necessary expenditures of the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993; to prescribe the provisos, terms, conditions and provisions witth respect to the items of appropriation and their payment; and to repeal al+ ordinances wholly in conflict with this ordinance and all ordinances inqonsistent with this ordinance to the extent of such inconsistency. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the COUNTY OF ALaEMARLE, VIRGINIA: SECTION I - GENERAL GOVERNMENT That the following sums of money be and the same hereby are appropriated fot the purposes herein specified for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993: Paragraph One For the current expenses of the function of TAX REFUNDS, ABATEMENTS, AND OTijER REFUNDS the sum of fifty-six thousand dollars and no cents ($56,000) is ap~ropriated from the General Fund to be apportioned as follows: 1. Refunds and Abatements $ 56,000 Paragraph Two For the current expenses of the function of GENERAL MANAGEMENT AND SU~PORT the sum of three million eight hundred forty-five thousand six hundred fotty-three dollars and no cents ($3,845,643) is appropriated from the General Fund to be apportioned as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Board of Supervisors County Executive Elections Finance Information Services Legal Services Personnel $ 362,126 374,192 133,866 1,795,012 832,867 193,880 153,700 Paragraph Three For the current expenses of the function of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT the sum of one million seven hundred twenty-seven thousand three hundred seventy-four dollars and no cents ($1,727,374) is appropriated from the General Fund to be apportioned as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. Albemarle Housing Improvement Program (AHIP) Extension Service Community Action Agency (MACAA) Housing $ 284,180 67,509 40,283 159,618 - 1 - 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Planning Planning District Commission (TJPDC) Route 29 Bus Service Soil and Water Conservation Water Resources Zoning Gypsy Moth Program Paragraph Four 690,614 47,140 29,500 24,504 42,875 320,451 20,700 For the current expenses of the function of HUMAN SERVICES the sum of fodr million twenty-three thousand nine hundred twenty-three dollars and no cents ($4,023,923) is appropriated from the General Fund to be apportioned as foll1ows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. , 12. 13. , 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Central Virginia Child Development Association Region Ten Community Services District Home Health Department Jefferson Area Board on Aging (JABA) Jefferson Area United Transportation (JAUNT) Legal Aid Society (CALAS) Madison House Outreach Counseling Piedmont Virginia Community College (PVCC) Family Services Shelter for Help in Emergency (SHE) Sexual Assault Resource Agency (SARA) Virginia Public Assistance Employment Service Program Energy Assistance Program Medicaid/UVA Program Teensight United Way Scholarship Program AIDS Support Group Children & Youth Commission Paragraph Five $ 7,560 201,180 32,000 510,880 94,310 150,775 12,640 3,900 22,075 7,310 5,100 44,530 20,350 2,606,956 60,311 16,014 163,839 19,228 23,450 5,000 16,515 For the current expenses of the function of JUDICIAL the sum of one mitlion two hundred seventy-two thousand six hundred eighty-one dollars and no ce~ts ($1,272,681) is appropriated from the General Fund to be apportioned as fo~lows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Circuit Court Clerk of Circuit Court Commonwealth's Attorney General District Court Juvenile Court Magistrate Sheriff - 2 - $ 53,939 401,583 292,396 9,970 42,402 3,660 468,731 Paragraph Six For the current expenses of the function of PARKS, RECREATION AND CU~TURE, the sum of two million five hundred forty-one thousand nine hundred eight dollars and no cents ($2,541,908) is appropriated from the General Fund to'be apportioned as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $ 1,480,774 9,570 847,356 6,000 102,930 20,000 75,278 Library Literacy Volunteers Parks & Recreation Piedmont Council of the Arts Rivanna Park Virginia Discovery Museum Visitor's Bureau Paragraph Seven For the current expenses of the function of PUBLIC SAFETY the sum of six mitlion four hundred forty-eight thousand two hundred sixteen dollars ($~,448,216) is appropriated from the General Fund to be apportioned as fo1lows: I 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. I 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Ambulance, Rescue Squads Community Attention Home Correction and Detention (Jail) Fire Department Fire/Rescue Volunteer Coordinator Forest Fire Extinction Service Inspections Emergency Operations Center (911) Juvenile Detention Home Offender Aid and Restoration (OAR) Police Department SPCA Contract Thomas Jefferson Emergency Services (EMS) Volunteer Fire Departments $ 132,570 51,705 136,601 554,260 40,753 13,595 630,580 410,941 60,134 34,070 3,918,331 11,655 12,395 440,626 Paragraph Eight , For the current expenses of the function of PUBLIC WORKS the sum of one million six hundred ninety-two thousand five hundred ninety-two dollars and no:cents ($1,692,592) is appropriated from the General Fund to be apportioned aSlfollows: 1. 2. 3. 4. Engineering Solid Waste Disposal/Recycling Staff Services CAC3 Grant $ 610,062 245,978 830,552 6,000 Paragraph Nine For the current expenses of the function of CONTINGENCY RESERVE the sum of :ninety-seven thousand four hundred fourteen dollars and no cents ($97,414) is lappropriated from the General Fund to be apportioned as follows: 1. Contingency Reserve $ 97,414 - 3 - Paragraph Ten For the current expenses of the function of CAPITAL OUTLAYS the sum of one million dollars and no cents ($1,000,000) is appropriated from the General Fund and transferred to: 1. Capital Improvements Fund $ 1,000,000 Paragraph Eleven For the current expenses of the Annual Payment to the City of Charlot- te~ville, pursuant to the REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT between the City and the County dated February 17, 1982, payable in January, 1993, in the amount of three million four hundred twenty-six thousand dollars and no cents ($3,426,000) is' appropriated from the General Fund as follows: 1. Revenue Sharing Agreement $ 3,426,000 Paragraph Twelve For the current expenses of OTHER USES OF FUNDS the sum of thirty-eight million twenty-four thousand forty-nine dollars and no cents ($38,024,049) is appropriated from the General Fund and transferred to: 1. 2. School Fund Debt Service Fund $ 32,828,664 5,195,385 SUMMARY Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT FUND appropriations Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 for $ 64,155,800 60,116,617 3,869,483 169,700 $ 64,155,800 To be provided as follows: Revenue from Local Sources (General Fund) Revenue from the Commonwealth Revenue from the Federal Government Total GENERAL FUND resources available For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 SECTION II - REGULAR SCHOOL FUND That the following sums of money be and the same hereby are appropriated for SCHOOL purposes herein specified for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993: Paragraph One For the current expenses of the REGULAR SCHOOL FUND the sum of fifty-four million three hundred thirty-nine thousand ninety-five dollars and no cents ($S4,339,095) is appropriated from the School Fund to be apportioned as follows: 1. 2. 3. Instruction Administration, Attendance & Health Pupil Transportation Services $ 41,511,997 1,682,174 4,873,145 - 4 - 4. 5. 6. 7. Facilities Operation/Maintenance Facilities Construction/Modification Other Use of Funds (Transfer to Debt Service Fund) Other Use of Funds (Transfer to Summer School Fund) SUM MAR Y Total Regular School Funds for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 To be provided as follows: Revenue from Local Sources (Local Revenues) Revenue from Local Sources (School Fund Balance) Revenue from the Commonwealth Revenue from the Federal Government Miscellaneous Revenue Total SCHOOL FUND resources available For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 SECTION III - Other School Funds 5,491,831 82,400 597,548 100,000 $ 54,339,095 32,828,664 205,000 20,303,674 592,179 409,578 $ 54,339,095 That the following sums of money be and the same hereby are appropriated for the purposes herein specified for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993: Paragraph One For the current expenses of the function of SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM the sum of one million seven hundred twenty-two thousand nine hundred eleven dollars an~ no cents ($1,722,911) is appropriated from the Cafeteria Fund to be apfortioned as follows: 1. Maintenance and Operation of School Cafeterias SUM MAR Y Total CAFETERIA OPERATIONS appropriations for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 To be provided as follows: Revenue from Local Sources Revenue from the Commonwealth Revenue from Refunds and Rebates Revenue from the Federal Government Total CAFETERIA FUND resources available For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 Paragraph Two $ 1,722,911 $ 1,722,911 1,242,699 39,550 5,550 435,112 $ 1,722,911 For the current expenses of the function of TEXTBOOK RENTALS, the sum of twq hundred twenty-nine thousand nine hundred dollars and no cents ($229,900) is appropriated from the Textbook Rental Fund to be apportioned as follows: 1. Textbooks - 5 - $ 229,900 SUM MAR Y Total TEXTBOOK RENTALS appropriations for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 $ 229,900 184,000 8,400 37,500 available $ 229,900 To be provided as follows: Revenue from Local Sources (Rental Fees) Revenue from Other Sources (Interest) Revenue from the Commonwealth Total TEXTBOOK RENTAL FUND resources For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 Paragraph Three For the current expenses of the function of the McINTIRE TRUST FUND the sum of ten thousand dollars and no cents ($10,000) is appropriated from the McJntire Trust Fund as follows: 1. Payment to County Schools $ 10,000 SUMMARY Total McINTIRE TRUST FUND appropriations for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 $ 10,000 To be provided as follows: Revenue from investments per trust Total McINTIRE TRUST FUND resources available For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 10,000 $ 10,000 Paragraph Four For the current expenses of the function of DEBT SERVICE the sum of five mi+lion seven hundred ninety-two thousand nine hundred thirty-three dollars an4 no cents ($5,792,933) is appropriated from the Debt Service Fund as follows: 1. 2. Debt Service Payments Lease/Purchase Payments-Capital Equipment $ 5,195,385 597,548 SUMMARY Total DEBT SERVICE appropriations for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 $ 5,792,933 To be provided as follows: Revenue From Local Sources (Transfer from General Fd) Revenue From Local Sources (Transfer from School Fd) Total DEBT SERVICE resources available For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 $ 5,195,385 597,548 5,792,933 Paragraph Five For the current expenses of the function of the PREP PROGRAM the sum of nine hundred forty-two thousand three hundred thirteen dollars and no cents - 6 - ($942,313) is appropriated from the PREP Program Fund to be apportioned as follows: 1. 2. E. D. Program C . B. 1. P. Severe SUMMARY Total PREP PROGRAM appropriations for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 To be provided as follows: Revenue Reimbursement from PREP Program Total PREP PROGRAM FUND resources available For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 Paragraph Six $ 511,320 430,993 $ 942,313 g42,313 $ 942,313 For the current expenses of the function of FEDERAL PROGRAMS the sum of eight hundred sixty-one thousand six hundred eighty-seven dollars and no cents ($$61,687) is appropriated from the Federal Programs Fund to be apportioned as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Chapter I Chapter II Migrant Education Drug Education Grant Miscellaneous Federal Revenue SUM MAR Y Total FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND appropriations for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 To be provided as follows: Revenue from the Federal Government Total FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND resources available For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 Paragraph Seven $ 637,705 51,096 72,266 78,000 22,620 $ 861,687 861,687 $ 861,687 For the current expenses of the function of COMMUNITY EDUCATION the sum of eight hundred fifty-eight thousand eighty-three dollars and no cents ($&58,083) is appropriated from the Community Education Fund to be apportioned as follows: 1. Community Education SUMMARY Total COMMUNITY EDUCATION FUND appropriations for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 - 7 - $ 858,083 $ 858,083 To be provided as follows: Revenues from Tuition and Fees Total COMMUNITY EDUCATION FUND resources For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 858,083 available $ 858,083 Paragraph Eight For the current expenses of the function of SUMMER SCHOOL the sum of two hundred seventy-eight thousand three hundred twenty-one dollars and no cents ($i78,321) is appropriated from the Summer School Fund to be apprortioned as follows: 1. Summer School $ 278,321 SUMMARY Total SUMMER SCHOOL appropriations for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 $ 278,321 144,321 24,000 10,000 Fund) 100,000 $ 278,321 To be provided as follows: Revenues from Tuition Revenue from the Commonwealth Carry-over Balance Revenue from Local Sources (Transfer from School Total SUMMER SCHOOL FUND resources available For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS MENTIONED IN SECTIONS I THROUGH III IN THIS ORDINANCE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993: RECAPITULATION Section I Section II Section III General Fund School Fund Other School Funds TOTAL $ 64,155,800 54,339,095 10,696,148 $129,191,043 Less Interfund Transfers: General Fund to School Fund General Fund to Debt Service Fund School Fund to Debt Service Fund School Fund to Summer School Fund $ 32,828,664 5,195,385 597,548 100,000 ($ 18,721,597) GRAND TOTAL BUDGET $ 90,469,446 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to transfer to other funds from the General Fund, from time to time as monies beqome available, sums equal to, but not in excess of, the appropriations made to these funds from the General Fund for the period covered by this appropria- tion ordinance. - 8 - l SECTION IV All of the monies appropriated as shown by the contained items in Sections I through III are appropriated upon the provisos, terms, conditions, and provisions herein before set forth in connection with said terms and those set forth in this section. Paragraph One Subject to the qualifications in this ordinance contained, all appro- pr~ations made out of the General Fund, the School Fund, the Cafeteria Fund, th$ McIntire Trust Fund, the Textbook Rental Fund, the Debt Service Fund, Prep Pr~gram Fund, Federal Programs Fund, Community Education Fund, Summer School Fu~d, are declared to be maximum, conditional and proportionate appropria- ti~ns--the purpose being to make the appropriations payable in full in the amQunt named herein if necessary and then only in the event the aggregate revenues collected and available during the fiscal year for which the appropri- ations are made are sufficient to pay all of the appropriations in full. Ot~erwise, the said appropriations shall be deemed to be payable in such pr@portion as the total sum of all realized revenue of the respective funds is to 1 the total amount of revenue estimated to be available in the said fiscal year by the Board of Supervisors. Paragraph Two All revenue received by any agency under the control of the Board of Su~ervisors or by the School Board or by the Board of Public Welfare not indluded in its estimate of revenue for the financing of the fund budget as submitted to the Board of Supervisors may not be expended by the said agency unqer the control of the Board of Supervisors or by the School Board or by the Board of Public Welfare without the consent of the Board of Supervisors being fi~st obtained. Nor may any of these agencies or boards make expenditures wh~ch will exceed a specific item of an appropriation or make transfers between specific items of appropriation without the consent of the Director of Finance being first obtained. Paragraph Three All balances of appropriations payable out of the General fund of the Co~nty treasury at the close of business on the thirtieth (30th) day of June, 1993, except as otherwise provided for, are hereby declared to be lapsed into the County treasury and shall be used for the payment of the appropriations which may be made in the appropriation ordinance for the next fiscal year, beginning July 1, 1993. However, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to be applicable to the School Fund, Capital Improvements Fund, Cafeteria Fund, Textbook Rental Fund, McIntire Trust Fund, Debt Service Fund, Prep Program Fund, Federal Programs Fund, Community Education Fund or Summer School Fuqd, but any balance available in these funds shall be used in financing the pr~posed expenditures of these funds for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1993. - 9 - Paragraph Four No obligations for goods, materials, supplies, equipment or contractual se~vices for any purpose may be incurred by any department, bureau, agency, or individual under the direct control of the Board of Supervisors except by requisition to the purchasing agent; provided, however, no requisition for contractual services--such as communications, travel, freight, express--and membership fees and subscriptions shall be required; and provided further that no requisition for contractual services involving the issuance of a contract on .a competitive bid basis shall be required, but such contract shall be app!roved by the head of the contracting department, bureau, agency, or in~ividual and the Purchasing Agent, who shall be responsible for securing suc~ competitive bids on the basis of specification furnished by the contrac- ti~g department, bureau, agency or individual. In the event of the failure for any reason of approval herein required fori such contracts, said contract shall be awarded through appropriate action of ~he Board of Supervisors. Any obligations incurred contrary to the purchasing procedures prescribed ~he Albemarle County Purchasing Manual shall not be considered obligations of the County, and the Director of Finance shall not issue any warrants in pa~ent of such obligations. Paragraph Five Allowances out of any of the appropriations made in this ordinance by any or ~ll County departments, bureaus, or agencies under the control of the Board of Supervisors to any of their officers and employees for expense on account of the use of such officers and employees of their personal automobiles in the dis~harge of their official duties shall be paid at the same rate as that estfiblished by the State of Virginia for its employees and shall be subject to chahge from time to time to maintain like rates. Paragraph Six All travel expense accounts shall be submitted on forms and according to regUlations prescribed or approved by the Director of Finance. Paragraph Seven All ordinances and parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance shall be and the same are hereby repealed. Paragraph Eight This ordinance shall become effective on July first, nineteen hundred and ninety-two. * "/, * * ,'c I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that this is a true, correct copy of the Annual Appropriation Ordinance as adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgini~' t e la~~n 1 on Jun~ 3, 1992. .~ / 1 rk, Board of C nty Supervisors - 10 - ,,'",; A :C-",~ 1 I;' .' '~i;~:_~i':~,&t2~,.t..,",~,___" County of Albemarle EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: FY 92-93 Appropriation Ordinance AGENDA DATE: June 3, 1992 ITEM NUMBER: :::.? V;(;{:I~:,.,: 7" / ,:> ACTION:---1L- INFORMATION: SUBJECT of the FY 92-93 Albemarle CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: STAFF C Mr. Tuc REVIEWED BY: m- ATTACHMENTS: White DISCUSSION: Attache for your approval is the Appropriation Ordinance for the FY 92-93 Albemarle County Operati g budget, which provides official approval for the expenditure of FY 92-93 funds beginni g July 1, 1992. The tot 1 appropriation of $90,469,446 (page 9) is $1,190 greater than the budget you approve on April 15 for two reasons: one, a reduction of $8,810 in federal grant revenues for ape-school program in the School Division, and the addition of $10,000 in FY 91-92 carry-o er funds in the Summer School Fund. Both of these revenue changes in the school budget ave been approved by the School Board. There have been no changes in the General Fund. Please eel free to call me if you have questions prior to the meeting. RECO ATION: Action equired is approval of the attached appropriation ordinance. 92.071 . , I , Edward H, Bain, JL Samuel Mille~ I David p, Bowerman Charlo"esvill~ I Charlotte y, Hpmphris Jack Jouett .. Tol. I I FRpM: I I DAtt'E: : COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest K Marshall, JL Scoltsville Charles 5, Martin Rivanna Walter F, Perkins White Hall MEMORANDUM Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~ June 4, 1992 SU~JECT: Board Actions of June 3, 1992 I I I I 1 At the Board of Supervisors meeting on June 3, 1992, the Bo~rd appropriated additional funding in the amount of $143,588 fo the Northside Library. Attached is the signed appropriation fo m. I I I I L$:ec I I At~achment I I cc. Roxanne White Richard E. Huff, II Donna Selle .. APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 91/92 NUMBER 910055 TYPE'OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL X TRANSFER NEW I ADVE,TISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES ! NO X i i I FUNDI CAPITAL I I PURP~SE OF APPROPRIATION: ADDItIONAL FUNDING FOR NORTHSIDE LIBRARY I I EXPENDITURE COST I CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ****~******************************************************************* 1900~73020950076 NORTHSIDE LIBRARY $143,588.00 TOTAL $143,588.00 I I I REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ****~******************************************************************* 2900q18100181110 DUMBARTON PROPERTIES-LEASE/IMP $102,350.00 2900g18100181120 LIBRARY DONATIONS 41,238.00 TOTAL $143,588.00 ****~******************************************************************* I I I REQU~STING COST CENTER: FINANCE I I APPRqvALS: SIGNATURE DATE I DIREC~OR OF FINANCE I ! ~tJt~ S-/<;--72- /--~:?'2--- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , ,.-', ./- / ,: :;.!' :~~... /" , " \;Sf'P:lj .:" I"' ;' . ';:?,' 'I,(J ;', ;? 7/- .z.~ ':'. ,f.,. ,." _"'~ . ~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Finance 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 Telephone (804) 296-5855 MEMORANDUM T<P: F*OM: DATE: Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~ May 19, 1992 Rt: Appropriation - Northside Library The County of Albemarle has appropriated $900,000 in the last two years in the CIP Fund for the Northside Library. The total c~st is projected at $1,043,588. The remaining $143,588 is to be funded from several sources detailed on the attached appropriation r~quest. The main source of additional revenue was the $102,350 contribution from the property owner to be used towards the r~novations. As you are aware, this amount is currently being deducted by the Library from the lease payments due to difficulties irl cOllecting from the property owner. Currently we have expended $962,933.51 on the Northside Library leaving a balance of $80,654.49. I have been assured by Dqnna Selle that this will be sufficient to complete the project. MAB/bs Attachment cc:: Donna Selle COUNlY OF ALBEMARLE r'Gll. tI\~1 ~ '.". ~,~ 1-1 ':' ,~". ,- iJ.i.:l' ~, . ~ ~.~ ~ ">. ''', .~..-' - _. ,.~. '," , ~, Ay ,~ j ~. c ~ . ,:""".'..~\.. MAY 20 1992~..:~..,' : t J . ;~ ~~liC"r~~r., ct, a ';,;:_ffl ~'li::~~~;. "t 1'-. ~~m EXECUTIVE OfFICI I I D ~TE J(A. .A..K ~ ;192- /1 , A ~ENDA ITEM NO. cf/.{)(uO 3/ 377 , A ~ENDA ITEM NAME <;-, C7' v) ((J..., ( (~~~ . j ( ? -<., "it ~~;1 D UNTIL j)J) 11(5 .,fa I v ~ I Form. 3 7/25/86 . ." D UNTIL Form. 3 7/25/86 )~M :; C-:_1 0\ 1 /} -> / -'j" 7 (> 7'.o?( . \... ::--', /' ... ,.1 K~r l____/ , '.)<J\ , 'JL 11 ~ lv' 0lc ---- ~ '//#1' ,? (" , ~,~< L-\ ... ./4 Q ') -.I) , ' 'V") s-.e"..-S ;;; i v:'Yl /) . I ~!c:-{ /) ''''i '.j) (-' J,~'-- fI "" I j~ \ '-\ - \~ << ..... C"; . ".L ',~.... c . ; _ _ c:;.! .~_?{ 2- r; c /c::"'-" County of Albemarle EXECUTIVE SUMMARY " , 'i <, I ~ r' ".\ f AGENDA DATE: June 3, 1992 AGENDA ITLE: Albemar e County Police Foundation i~~~j!;*~~' (/';) /; t,:"", ~ ~ C(" ~. .1;....'1- ,-_" /'..."1 .' SUBJECT RE UEST: Chief is soliciting Board concurr to establish an Albemarle County Police Foundation whose purposes shall i elude management skills excpanges with th private sector, a vehicle by which private and corporate donations can be made to enco rage innovative projects, and to increas the public awareness of the role of the olice department in our community. I STAFF C NTACT Messrs. Tucker Huff. ACTION: --X- INFORMATION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes REVIEWED BY: BACKGRO Several the co communi proposa for equ' process'l I months ago, representatives of the Police Department and various business leaders in unity began discussing a way to forge stronger partnerships between the business y and the law enforcement community. As an outgrowth of these discussions, a has been developed to establish a non-profit foundation which could accept donations ment and projects which are beyond the ability to fund through the regular budgetary DISCUSS ON: The fou dation concept has been used in other localities to improve the relationship between law enf rcement personnel and the community. It fits well with our community oriented policin concept which is targeted towards making the Police Department an integral part of the co unity which it serves. Chief Miller sees the Foundation as an important component for tap ing the breadth of knowledge of the private sector as well as providing the mechanism by whic donations could be made that would keep the department distanced from the donor so as not to provide any potential for conflict of interest or perceived favoritism. Examples of projects which the Foundation could participate in include an annual banquet to recognize outstan ing contributions of citizens and others in the area of crime prevention, the purchas of specialized equipment for DUI enforcement and the Emergency Response Team, seed money fo innovative programs recommended by citizen input, and management exchanges between our pol ce department and local businesses to share supervision skills and successful program~. I I I ! I RECO ATION: Executi e staff and County Attorney staff have reviewed the proposal and made several amendme ts which have been incorporated. Staff recommends that the Board authorize Chief Miller t move forward with the formation of the Foundation in line with the attached Charter and By- aws. 92.055 j .. tr AlBEMARLE COUN'N POLlCE DEPT.. MAR G 1992 i JAMES M, I OWLlNG, IV DEPUTY coutTY ATTORNEY I I I I ! I I C~ief John F. Miller A~bemarle County Police 401 McIntire Road C~arlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 I I Re: Albemarle County Police Foundation D1ar John: j This letter is in reply to your memorandum dated March 2, 1992 in which you asked this office to review the content of the p oposed charter and bylaws of the Albemarle County pclice F undation. You also asked this office to confirm there is not a cjnflict of interest on your part or that of the Ccunty glvernment, vis-a-vis the Albemarle County Police Foundation. I I have reviewed the proposed charter and bylaws and they a pear to be in proper legal order. Also, there is no confl ict o interest under the Virginia Conflict of Interests Act or p ohibition by law on your part or that of the County government, v s-a-vis the Albemarle County Police Foundation charter and b laws. However, a potential for conflict under the Virginia C nflict of Interests Act may exist if, for example, a County e ployee who is also a director of the Foundation received c~mpensation for providing services other than director's s rvices from the Foundation. This would have to be determined o a case-by-case basis. ! I 1 Also, as we discussed before, I think that the County E~ecutive (and perhaps the Board of Supervisors if the County E ecutive deems it appropriate) needs to sign off on this c ncept. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of County Attorney 416 Park Street Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 Telephone 296-7138 ]\1a rc h 4, 19 9 2 GEORGE R, ST,JOHN ::OUNTY ATTORNEY If you have any questions, please let me know. Very t~ yours, JameS~BOWling, IV Deputy County Attorney JMjB/tlh I I 1 I I ~ <<' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE I la: MEMORANDUM FROM: ROBERT TUCKER, COUNTY EXECUTIVE RICHARD HUFF, DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE CHIEF JOHN F. MILLER~~~ APRIL 15, 1992 DATE: IRE: I I "l I I I ALBEMARLE COUNTY POLICE FOUNDATION I have attached the proposed Albemarle County Police F undation Charter and By-Laws. The Foundation will be set up as a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the quality of lice service in the County and strengthening the relationship tween the police department and the community. The Foundation will encourage, support and recognize ofessionalism at every level wi thin the Department. It will cus on improving the Department's efficiency and effectiveness in ree ways: First, it will provide guidance through the exchange management skills between business and the Police Department. cond it will provide resources to the department including seed ney, special equipment and in-kind services to encourage the velopment of innovative programs and projects; and finally it II recognize Department members and citizens by rewarding tstanding performance in promoting crime prevention efforts and e community policing philosophy. 1 I recognize several factors must be achieved if the Foundation if to be successful. I I . . . 1 * The Pollce Foundatlon Board of Dlrectors must have a g~nUine interest and enthusiasm. By reaching out and involving a w de representation of our community, who are respected, creative a d energetic, we can accomplish the purposes of the Foundation. I tl * The Police Department's command staff must be committed a d involved. They will have to seek out and meet with prospective m mbers and champion the Police Foundation's philosophy and m ssion. I I i I .J I ... . Mr. Tucker Mt. Huff April 15, Prge Two I 1992 * The command staff will have to accept "outsiders" review of our operations. This attitude must be based on a firm belief that a police organization must continue to try various approaches a~d techniques to solve problems and improve operations. I i The Police Foundation concept has been successful in several other localities such as Baltimore County, Maryland and New York c~ty, New York. Our community has a large number of citizens who ate willing to volunteer their time and efforts to enhance our c ime prevention efforts and improve the quality of police services w deliver. I I I The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the Foundation d~cuments and finds no conflict of interest under the Virginia C~nflict of Interest Acts and no prohibition to the Foundation by law. Their review cautions that case-by-case determinations would bl appropriate for certain reimbursements if a board member is also a county employee. The next meeting of the Foundation Working G oup as yet to be scheduled, will discuss and develop a p eliminary list of prospective Board members. We will also begin w rking on strategies to present the concepts and philosophy of the F~undation to prospective Board members. i I JIf'M/lbv I I ...' '" -, J/ '5 e CR/I , ...,.-,,--' ?/? /~ 2' / .1<C . ALBEMARLE COUNTY POLICE FOUNDATION PROJECTED PROJECTS 1.; Annual Awards Program The Foundation will establish an annual awards program to recognize citizens and Albemarle County police personnel and volunteers who have performed outstanding service in the areas of community oriented policing and crime prevention. The success of the police department's philosophy of community oriented policing depends on the willingness of police personnel and citizens to work together on issues of mutual concern. An annual awards program will encourage the development of community/enforcement partnerships and will reward the efforts of those involved by recognizing innovative problem-solving and/or programming. By highlighting those persons who assume leadership roles in promoting community oriented policing and crime prevention, the Foundation will be helping to focus attention on proactive efforts that can be instituted throughout the County. 2. Solicitation, Handling and Dispersal of Funds The Foundation will solicit, accept, handle and distribute all money that is donated to the Albemarle County Police Department, following the example set by the New York Police Foundation. That foundation was established in the early 1970's with the primary purpose, as recommended by the Knapp Commission, to provide a system whereby money or equipment was not donated directly to the police department, thus reducing the opportunity for police corruption. The Foundation will also establish funding guidelines and provide seed money to finance innovative community-based programs that further the education and prevention goals established by the department's community policing philosophy. 3.: Equipment Procurement The Foundation will solicit or otherwise provide funds for one-time purchases of specialized police equipment that exceed regularly budgeted expenditures. Examples of this type of one-time purchase include Emergency Response Team equipment like body bunkers, special weapons and other specialized protective gear. The Foundation will establish funding priorities and guidelines and will approve or disapprove special equipment requests according to those guidelines. ... l '- . Alpemarle County Police Foundation Pa~e TWo I I 4. Management/Supervisory Skills Exchange The Foundation will provide guidance for the development of a skills exchange program between the police department and local businesses and corporations. Police Management and supervisory personnel will work with selected businesses and corporations to observe and improve their abilities in decision-making, goal setting, personnel administration, policy development and implementation and other management skills. Also, business and corporate leaders will spend time in the police department to review policies and procedures with regard to efficiency and effectiveness and produce suggestions for improved performance. , , "." . THE ALBEM...\RLE COUNTY POLICE FOUNDATION BYLAWS ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective meanings ,ascribed to such terms in the Foundation's Articles of Incorporation. I I ARTICLE II DIRECTORS 2.1 Requirement for and Duties of Board of Directors. The Foundation shall have I I la Board of Directors. All corporate powers shall be exercised by or under the authority of, I I I land the business and affairs of the Foundation managed under the direction of, its Board I I 10f Direc,tors, subject to any limitation set forth in the Articles of Incorporation. I I I : 2.2 Number: Qualifications: Classes. The number of directors, the qualit1cations for I I I Idirectors, and the classes of directors shall be as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation. I I I I I 2.3 Appointment and Election: Term: Removal. Directors shall be appointed or , I I lelected in the manner and for the term set forth in the Articles of Incorporation and in I , iaccordance with the nomination procedure set forth in Section 3.2 of these Bylaws. I I I IDirectors may be removed pursuant to the procedures and for the reasons set forth in the I I IArtic1es of Incorporation. 2.4 Meetings. The Board of Directors may hold regular or special meetings at such place, either ",Iithin or without the Commonwealth of Virginia, as may be provided in the I , rotice of the meeting and approved by the Chairman of the Board, a majority of the Board 1 I I I I .-. ., , i Iof Directors, or a majority of the Appointed Directors. If no such place is designated in the Inotice of a meeting, it shall be held at the principal office of the Foundation. I I I 2.5 Notice of Meetings. Notice of meetings of the Board of Directors shall be given Ita each director not less than seventy-two (72) hours before the meeting, by delivering the I I Isame to him in person or to his residence or business address (or such other place as he may I I Ihave directed in writing) by mail, messenger, telecopier, telegraph, or other means of written I I Icommunication or by telephoning such notice to him. A11Y such notice shall set forth the I time and place of the meeting. I 2.6 Waiver of Notice. A director may waive any notice required by law, the Articles 1 I lof Incorporation, or these Bylaws before or after the date and time stated in the notice, and I I Isuch waiver shall be equivalent to the giving of such notice. Except as provided in the next I I I raragraph of this section, the waiver shall be in writing, signed by the director entitled to the I rotice, and filed with the minutes or corporate records. i A director's attendance at or participation in a meeting waives any required notice 1 ~o him of the meeting unless the director at the beginning of the meeting or promptly upon I I ~is arrival objects to holding the meeting or transacting business at the meeting and does not I I ~hereafter vote for or assent to action taken at the meeting. I I I 2.7 Quorum: Votin~. A majority of the number of directors fixed in the Articles of I I ~ncorporation shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of the aoard of Directors,provided that at least three Appointed Directors shall be present. Unless I I I ~pecifically provided otherwise in the Articles of Incorporation or in these By]aws~ the act I I I Pf a majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the -2- '. . ~ lact of the Board of Directors. A director who is present at a meeting of the Board of , IDirectors or a committee of the Board of Directors when corporate action is taken is I I jdeemed to have assented to the action taken unless (i) he objects at the beginning of the I Imeeting, or promptly upon his arrival, to holding it or transacting specified business at the I Imeeting; or (ii) he, votes against, or abstains from, the action taken. I I I 2.8 Telephonic Meetin~s. The Board of Directors may permit any or all directors I I I Ito participate in a regular or special meeting by, or conduct the meeting through the use of, I I I lany means of communication by which all directors participating may simultaneously hear I I ~ach other during the meeting. A director participating in a meeting by this means is I I I ~eemed to be present in person at the meeting. I I I I 2.9 Action Without Meeting. Action required or permitted to be taken at a Board I I I bf Directors' meeting may be taken without a meeting if the action is taken by all members I I I pf the Board. The action shall be evidenced by one or more written consents stating the ! I flction taken, signed by each director either before or after the action is taken, and included tn the minutes or filed with the corporate records reflecting the action taken. Action taken ~nder this section shall be effective when the last director signs the consent unless the I I I fonsent specifies a different effective date and states the date of execution by each director, I I ~n which event it shall be effective according to the terms of the consent. ARTICLE III COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS 3.1 Committees. The Board of Directors may create one or more committees, ~ncluding an Executive Committee, and may appoint members of the Board of Directors to I I I I -3- . ,. !serve on them. Any such committee shall have two or more members who serve at the plea- , isure of the Board of Directors. In addition, the Appointed Directors shall serve as the I I INominating Committee (the ItNominating Committee"). The creation of a committee and I I I lappointment of members to it (other than the Nominating Committee) shall be approved ! I Iby a majority of directors in office when the action is taken. I ! i 3.2 Nominatin~ Committee. The Nominating Committee shall decide upon a slate I I lof Elected Directors and officers at least thirty days prior to any meeting at which an I I I lelection of Elected Directors or officers is to be held (including any election to fill a vacancy) I I I land shall present such slate to the Board of Directors at least twenty days prior to such I Imeeting. No person shall be nominated for election or elected by the Board of Directors I I las an Elected Director or officer who has not been presented to the Board of Directors by I I Ithe Nominating Committee in accordance with this Section 3.2. ! I I i 3.3 Authority of Other Committees. To the extent specified by the Board of I IDirectors, each committee other than the Nominating Committee may exercise the authority I lof the Board of Directors, except that such committee may not (i) fill vacancies on the I IBoard of Directors or on any of its committees; (ii) amend the Articles of Incorporation; (Hi) I I ~dopt, amend or repeal these Bylaws; (iv) approve a plan of merger or consolidation; (v) I I I ~pprove the sale, lease or exchange, or the mortgage, pledge or other disposition of all, or ! I rubstantially all, of the property and assets of the Foundation; or (vi) approve a plan to I ~issolve the Foundation. 3.4 Committee Meetings: Miscellaneous. The provisions of these Bylaws which I govern meetings, action without meetings, notice and waiver of notice, and quorum and I I I I I I I -4- , .' A 'voting requirements of the Board of Directors shall apply to committees of directors and their members as well. ARTICLE IV OFFICERS 4.1 Officers. The officers of the Foundation shall be a Chairman of the Board, a I I I I I ITreasurer, and a Secretary, and in the discretion of the Board of Directors, one or more I I I IVice.Presidents and other officers and assistant officers as may be deemed necessary or I I I !advisable to carry on the business of the Foundation. Any two or more offices may be held ! I by the same person. I I I I I , 4.2 Election: Term. Officers shaH be nominated for office by the Nominating I I Fommittee and elected by the Board of Directors for the term of one year; provided, I I ~lOwevel~ that in the event an office becomes vacant for any reason other than the expiration I I bf the current term of service, the election or appointment to fill such office shall only be I I I ror the unexpired term. Any oft1cer may resign at any time upon written notice to the Board I I I pI' Directors, and no acceptance of a resignation shall be necessary to make it effective. I I : 4.3 Removal of Officers. The Board of Directors may remove any officer or assistant I I I pfficer at any time, with or without cause. I , 4.4 Duties of Officers. The Chairman of the Board shall be the Chief Executive pfficer of the Foundation. He and the other officers of the Foundation shall have such , rowers and duties as generally pertain to their respective offices as well as such powers and I I ~uties as may be delegated to them from time to time by the Board of Directors. I I I , -5- ". . . _ )0 . ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5.1 Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the Foundation shall be determined in the 1 I ~iscretion of the Board of Directors, but in the absence of any such determination it shall ! I ~e the calendar year. I 5.2 Interpretation. For the purpose of construing these Bylaws, unless the context ~ndicates otherwise, words in the singular number shall be deemed to include words in the I I I W1ural and vice versa, and words in one gender shall be deemed to include words in other I I I $enders. I I : 5.3 Amendments. These Bylaws may be amended or repealed, and new Bylaws may I I I lDe made at any meeting of the Board of Directors. Any amendment to or repeal of these I Ji3ylaws shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the Appointed Directors and a I , I llnajority of the Elected Directors then in office. I 5.4 Restrictions on Fundraisin~. The Foundation shall not, directly or indirectly, rpake unsolicited telephone calls for fundraising purposes without the prior written consent I I I qf the Chief of Police (such consent to be granted only after consultation with the County $xecutive ). 4.cP2C02C.MHC -6. ~, ", ". . ... . . THE ALBEMARLE COUN1Y POLICE FOUNDATION ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION ARTICLE I NAME The name of the corporation is the Albemarle County Police Foundation. The Albemarle County Police Foundation is hereinafter referred to as the "Foundation". ARTICLE II PURPOSES The Foundation is organized exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific vurposes including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that Ci}ualify as exempt organizations under Section SOl( c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. In eurtherance thereof the Foundation's purposes shall include the following: (a) to provide guidance in the exchange of management skills between business and t~e Albemarle County Police Department (the "Department"); (b) to provide resources to the Department, including seed money, equipment and ip-kind services, to encourage the development of innovative programs and projects; (c) to recognize Department members and citizens of Albermarle County by r~warding and promoting outstanding performance throughout the Department and qommunity; and .,JIJ< . (d) to provide assistance and support to those serving as police officers in Albemarle ~ounty by increasing the public awareness of the role of the police officer in modern society. All of the foregoing purposes, however, shall be subject to the limitation that they ~hall be made only within the scope of activities permitted by Section SOl( c)(3) of the I I Irternal Revenue Code. ARTICLE III DISTRIBUTIONS No part of the net earnings of the Foundation shall inure to the benefit of or be I I I I ~istributable to its incorporator, directors, officers or other private persons except that the I I ~oundation shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation for services ! I I rpndered and to make payments and distributions in furtherance of the purposes set forth I I i, Article II hereof. No substantial part of the activities of the Foundation shall be the I I I c~rrying on of propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, and the I I I ~oundation shall not participate in or intervene in (including the publishing or distribution I I o~ statements) any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for ! I prblic office. ARTICLE IV DISSOLUTION Upon the dissolution of the Foundation, and after all of its liabilities and obligations h~ve been paid, satisfied and discharged or adequate provisions made therefor, all of the I I I I -2- 4/0 . Foundation's remaining assets shall be distributed to one or more organizations that are qrganized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes within the meaning of Sections SiOl(c)(3) and 170(c)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. I ARTICLE V MEMBERS The Foundation shall have no members. ARTICLE VI DIRECfORS 6.1 Requirement for and Duties of Board of Directors. The Foundation shall have al board of directors (the "Board of Directors"). All corporate powers shall be exercised by I I , qr under the authority of, and the business of the Foundation managed under the direction I I , qf, the Board of Directors, subject to the limitations set forth in these Articles of I I I I~corpora tion. I 6.2. Number: Classes. The number of directors of the Foundation shall be fifteen. lIhe incorporator shall appoint the initial board of directors. Five of the initial directors , s~an be designated appointed directors (the "Appointed Directors") and ten of the initial I I d~rectors shall be designated elected directors (the "Elected Directors"). The directors I , cpnstituting the initial board of directors shall hold office until the first annual meeting. I I lihereafter, directors shall be elected or appointed in the manner and for the terms provided I I I iq Section 6.3. -3- 4JO . 6.3. Election or Appointment: Staggered Terms. (a) At the first annual meeting, tpe directors shall be divided into three groups of five directors each. The number of tPPointed Directors in each group shall be as nearly equal as possible. The terms of the trectors in the first group shall expire at the first annual meeting after their election or ~ppointment, the terms of the directors in the second group shall expire at the second I I ~nnual meeting after their election or appointment, and the terms of directors in the third I I ~oup shall expire at the third annual meeting after their election or appointment. I I I I I ! I I It elected or appointed for a term of three years to succeed the directors of the group I I ~hose terms then expire. The Department's Chief of Police then holding office (the "Chief') I I shall appoint the Appointed Directors. I I I ~ppointed Directors and elected by the Board of Directors then serving. I (b) At each annual meeting held after the first annual meeting, directors shall Elected Directors shall be nominated by the , i 6.4 Removal: Vacancies. (a) The Chief may remove any Appointed Director, with I ot without cause, at any time. The Board of Directors may remove any Elected Director, ~ith or without cause, at any time, but only at a meeting called for that purpose, and the I I n~tice of the meeting must state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting I I I isl the removal of the Elected Director. The removal of an Elected Director shall be I I effective only upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors. I I I : (b) A vacancy on the Board of Directors, including a vacancy resulting from I I I t~e removal of a director or an increase in the number of directors may be filled (i) in the I I c~se of an Appointed Director, by the Chief, and (ii) in the case of an Elected Director, by I I I t~e affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors though less than a quorum of -4- f". 111 _...... .. the Board of Directors. In the case of a resignation that will become effective at a specified later date, a vacancy may be filled before it occurs, but the new director may not take office I ~ntil the vacancy occurs. 6.4 Oualifications For Directors. Directors need not be residents of Albemarle <Jounty or the Commonwealth of Virginia. No person shall be eligible for appointment or I , I e~ection to the Board of Directors who shall have previously served as a director of the I , Iloundation for more than four and one-half years. No individual shall be appointed or I I e~ected a director without his prior consent. The Bylaws may prescribe additional ! , q~alifications for directors. 6.5 Compensation of Directors. The Foundation shall not pay any director a fee I , o~ other compensation for attending regular or special meetings of directors or otherwise I , s~rving as a director of the Foundation; provided, however, that the Foundation may I , r~imburse any director for reasonable expenses incurred by him in attending any regular or I I I sfecial meeting of directors and such reimbursement shall be payable whether or not a I , ~eeting is adjourned because of the absence of a quorum, and provided further that nothing I ~ h~rein shall be construed to preclude a director from serving the Foundation in any other I , I capacity and receiving compensation therefor. I I ARTICLE VII REGISTERED OFFICE AND REGISTERED AGENT The address of the initial registered office of the Foundation, which is located in the qty of Charlottesville, Virginia, is 418 East Jefferson Street, P.O. Box 1288, Charlottesville, -5- , 0" · .. a. Virginia 22902. The initial registered agent of the Foundation is Michael H. Cole, whose 1j>usiness office is identical with the initial registered office and who is a resident of Virginia I 4nd a member of the Virginia State Bar. ARTICLE VIII LIMIT ON LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION 8.1 Limit on Liability. In every instance in which the Virginia Nonstock Corporation +ct, as it exists on the date hereof or may hereafter be amended, permits the limitation or I I ~limination of liability of directors or officers of a corporation to the corporation, the I I directors and officers of the Foundation shall not be liable to the Foundation. I I I i 8.2 Mandatory Indemnification. The Foundation (the term "Foundation" as used in I I t~is Section 8.2 shall mean this Foundation only and no predecessor entity or other legal I I ~ntity) shall indemnify any individual who is, was or is threatened to be made, a party to a I cfvil, criminal, administrative, investigative or other proceeding (including a proceeding by I 4r in the right of the Foundation) because such individual is or was a director or officer of I *e Foundation, or of any other legal entity controlled by the Foundation, against all I , l~abilities and reasonable expenses incurred by him or her on account of the proceeding I ! I ercept such liabilities and expenses as are incurred because of his or her willful misconduct of knowing violation of the criminal law. Before any indemnification is paid a determination I shall be made that indemnification is permissible in the circumstances because the person I I I seeking indemnification has met the standard of conduct set forth above. Such I I I -6- ...... ~ ........ " d~termination shall be made in the manner provided by Virginia law for determining that iijdemnification of a director is permissible, provided, however, that if a majority of the d.rectors of the Foundation has changed after the date of the alleged conduct giving rise to ai claim for indemnification, the determination that indemnification is permissible shall, at I I t~e option of the person claiming indemnification, be made by special legal counsel agreed upon by the Board of Directors and such person. Unless a determination has been made I t~at indemnification is not permissible, the Foundation shall make advances and I I r~imbursement for expenses incurred by any of the persons named above upon receipt of I I an undertaking from him or her to repay the same if it is ultimately determined that such I , i~dividual is not entitled to indemnification. The Foundation is authorized to contract in i a~vance to indemnify any of the persons named above to the extent it is required to iqdemnify them pursuant to this Section 8.2. 8.3 Miscellaneous. The rights of each person entitled to indemnification under this I I .N-ticle shall inure to the benefit of such person's heirs, executors and administrators. I I~demnifica!ion pursuant to this Article shall not be exclusive of any other right of I in~emnification to which any person may be entitled, including indemnification pursuant to I a ~alid contract, indemnification by legal entities other than the Foundation and indemni- fiqation under policies of insurance purchased and maintained by the Foundation or others. '2: ~, no person shall be entitled to indemnification by the Foundation to the extent he I is iindemnified by another, including an insurer. I -7- .. ., ......... . ARTICLE IX INTERNAL REVENUE CODE Each reference in these Articles of Incorporation to a Section of the Internal ~evenue Code means such Section of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or , I ~he corresponding provisions of any subsequent federal tax law. I I I ARTICLE X REQUIRED VOTE FOR CERTAIN ACfIONS The following matters shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the I I I ~ppointed Directors and a majority of the Elected Directors then in office: (i) any I I I ~mendment to these Articles of Incorporation; (iii) the adoption, amendment or repeal of I I t~e Bylaws; (iv) the approval of a plan of merger or consolidation; (v) the approval of the I I I s~le, lease or exchange, or the mortgage, pledge or other disposition of all, or substantially I I ~ll, of the property and assets of the Foundation; or (vi) the approval of a plan to dissolve. I I I I ~ated: I I I I I I I By: Michael H. Cole, Incorporator I I I I I c~a\2547\ACP2C01B.MHC ! -8- MOTION: Mr. Bain SECOND: Mrs. Humphris MEETING DATE: June 3, 1992 CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi- sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 requires a certification by the Supervisors that such executive conformity with Virginia law; of the Code of Virginia Albemarle County Board of meeting was conducted in NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors. VOTE: AYES: Mr. Bain, Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin and Perkins. NAYS: None. [For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the requirements of the Act should be described.] ABSENT DURING VOTE: None. ABSENT DURING MEETING: None. '! D~TE AGENDA ITEM NO. A~ENDA ITEM NAME D _ UNTIL Form. 3 7/25/86 I j. -1, /9 c; 2 \ 'A. {I ~_ , tjl a SZY, /~ ,) ,5;.. (! tJ 115 !,', lie /~'?0;l.~ a't'J l(/)Jc !l,~ .,(,s In:-vr " j, (\/ I; 1.-1'/2 ;;,. Ntr/? ~C;;<;'?:'" , - 'I I . . Jv~ ~ Jf? ;':).. D ~TE ~ , /~ ,) ') I;:; ,~ - 3 Ai ~ENDA ITEM NO. -1,;;,\ ' iJ~, ~:l L /" /::Jc''G.L tfl./fl.fi-/..-f- !t/t l,... A ~ENDA ITEM NAME :r. LA! /'~I'Lv/ nv-- L < D r-- UNTIL ~-~ /0 Form. 3 7/25/86 I , ,~ I Edward H, Bain, JL Samuel Mill€lr David p, Bowerman Charlottesville Charlotte y, Humphris Jack Jouett TO: FROM: DATE: R~: ~.- ~ -~-, /';:.:>'-. , , :Ii' : ,'Z c2, tJ =?~ 19. 5 ~Y , I, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Albemarle County Board of supe;~jsors David P. Bowerman, Chairman~~ May 19, 1992 I' arrest K Marshall, JL ScottsvilJe Charles S Martin Rivanna Walter F, Perkins White Hall Keeting with secretary of Economic Development AS; you recall, in March of this year, Mayor Edwards, Messrs. Hendrix and Tucker and I met with Mr. Larry Framme, Secretary of E~onomic Development, and Mr. Hugh Keogh, Director of the Office of Economic Development, to discuss any support that the State could provide the County and City as it relates to economic development. While several issues were discussed, the most beneficial one, from my perspective, was the suggested "table top" analysis of industrial sites with the State Economic Development staff. Also, it appeared to be beneficial to place all of the various industrial sites that are either zoned or designated for development in our Comprehensive Plan in the State's database which includes items s~ch as infrastructure availability, closeness to major interstate a~cess, major universities with engineering schools, and airport access. This process would provide an opportunity for the County t~ specify the types of industries we feel would be most beneficial to the community and its goals. U,less the Board feels otherwise, I would like to direct staff to ptoceed with a table top analysis and provision of industrial site lcations wi thin the State's database as suggested by Messrs. F*amme and Keogh. I have asked staff to place this on the June 3rd a~enda for our discussion and direction of staff. D~B/dbm 92.023 --r /. '. ~ ,< . ~ "'--,,>1 9 - ,/,;;L " ::....,/ - "._^-'--'-----'''''' <;/-,2 , CI ~?(> :'3 ~1 S- Edward H, Bain, JL Samuel Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804)MZ%-H8413 R AFRXD(8lD4M 972-4060 'Oorrest R Marshall. Jr Scottsville David p, Bowerman Charlottesville Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y flumphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall TO: Members of the Board of Supervisors Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CHC ~ DATE: May 29, 1992 FROM: SUBJECT: Appointments to Various Boards/Commissions/Committees ARCHI~ECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: expire on November 14, 1992. One member to replace James Caswell. Interviews were held on May 20, 1992. Term will CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION: Two members. One vacancy to fill position vacated by Ann Webb last November 14. Interviews scheduled for May 20, 1992. Term will be for three years from November 14, 1991. Also, Eve Haverson, the student representative is no longer a member. An appointee for this position has been solicited from the three high school principals. PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD OF DIRECTORS: The terms of Grace Carpenter, Harolp Dixon and J. T. Henley, III, all expire on June 30, 1.992. All three membets have been contacted, and all would like to be reappointed. COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD (REGION 10): The term of Dr. W. D. Buxton expires on June 30, 1992. He is not eligible for reappointment. This vacancy will be advertised. FIRE PREVENTION CODE BOARD OF APPEALS: The term of William C. Thacker expires November 21, 1991. He is eligible for reappointment. LIB~Y BOARD: The term of Mary V. Mikalson expires on June 30, 1992. She does not wish to be reappointed (See letter attached). SCHOO~ BOARD: The term of Michael J. Marshall as the at-large member expires on June 30, 1992. By State law, this vacancy was advertised, and applications from interested persons are attached for your review. The public hearing has been sched~led for June 10. LEN:mms I \ 'iJ. " ,..; - County of Albemarle EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I' ~"i l\ ,\" ;'~, 1('9') AGENDA 1ITLE: Library!Board Appointment AGENDA D'A':fE: June 3, 1992 ,,:<.7',')- <;;::':~: t? (-, () / ,'"'.) ACTION:~ INFORMATION: review issue of the Jefferson- to fill CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: I I STAFF CONTACTlS): Messrs.1Tucker and Huff I REVIEWED BY: BACKGROqND: At its /neeting on May 20, 1992, the Board asked staff to outline issues surrounding a conside~ation of appointing a county staff member to serve on the Jefferson-Madison Regional Library IBoard of Directors. Mrs. Mary Mikalson has indicated she does not wish to be re- appoint~d when her term expires on June 30, 1992. DISCUSS ON: The vac ncy on the Library Board effective July 1, 1992 gives the Board of Supervisors an opportu ity to consider appointing a staff member to the Library Board which could provide a direc liaison with the Board of Supervisors. In FY 92-93, Albemarle County expects to contribqte $1.47 million toward the operation of the regional library system. This will account lfor 63% of the total funds contributed by the participating jurisdictions in the regiona1 program. Due to the size and significance of Albemarle's responsibility in this area, a Ibalance between programmatic concerns and fiscal abilities is important. I , As a re~ated issue, staff understands that the Library Board will be reactivating a budget committ~e that will invite representatives from the staff of each participating jurisdiction to join lin the budget development process for the Library's $2.34 million operating budget. This willl provide input, in a non-voting way, to the allocation process before it is formally present~d to the County for review by the Board of Supervisors. This may be an acceptable alterna~'ive to placing a staff member as a county representative on the Board of Directors if the Bard of Supervisors is comfortable with the level of involvement and scope that this committ Ie will provide. RECOMME ATION: Since c unty representation on the Library Board and most other Boards/Commissions has previouslly been citizen appointee, the Board may wish to give the reactivated budget committ~e an opportunity to function before appointing a staff member. The Board could reconsi~er this matter at the next available vacancy, if warranted. 92.074 . , ' l I \.. . ,..,~i' , ., , :< i1' \~,..~i ,'I l { 1 tJ 1 I I Edward H, Bak JL Samuel Miller I David p, Bow1rman Charlottesvillr Charlotte y, H~mphris Jack Jouett I I I I I COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 June 4, 1992 Forrest R, Marshall. Jr, Scottsville Charles S, Martin Rivanna Walter F, Perkins While Hall I I M:S' Ruthann F. Brown 5 0 Manor Road E rlysville, VA I I DtarJ1r5"- Brown. I I At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on June 3, 1992, you w!re appointed to the Children and Youth Commission with said term tr expire on November 14, 1994. : On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity t~ express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve t,e County in this capacity. 22936 I?~~ 0;;;; David P. Bowerman Chairman l1n/ I c4: Jeanne Cox, Clerk of Council Rory Carpenter, Director The Honorable James L. Camblos, III ... . fY";t? t? ~'- /7~ ::2-0 .....\"\'< OF AL812f\1 600\'"' ~~(~ ~ ~ j;. OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ) COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE (Please type or print) Board/ctmmission/committee /btd/7 cf- ;:1/;//1 "'PPlica~t' s Name tflIIW;?/1 '! '1' gflO~'I) Home Ad~ress6.;j(> /7J?t7tJ,L &/ 1Jy,)r;~ iJi/le_ 1If);;c2X3~ Magiste~ial District in which your home residence is located /ckc/M{}cI( I Busines~ Address SeI-r Ef-nfl /0 Llte/ --J/C-1 {OJ e Phone C?? P IcY ~3 1 rYlL'lf1 /g r ( Pm C)0?-;;'/-,/fo EmPlOyet J () / f7 rW n q Occupation/Ti tIe Date Of! Empioyment Birthdate/Place /1J..!Ji..- w'n/Dablk{ I I Years R!=sident of Albemarle County --3...- Previous Residence '-TO I/FIQ)cI. C-t I I i n II - 11 Spouse' ~ Name 11 R J.::;R OU.JI/ c~R Number of Children '/ Educati~n (Degrees ari~ Graduation )Je) -:JCS 1 , Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups n 1 . -r!,Ae~+!d U J.5oR <( jfY2e m J:eRsh1 f S'f 1YW-I/'eU'Is ('Au R ch I.Tfi0~ :i.t )'d1AR Ks (:: j l'fh cJ/ ;' /()t?e n LD'nD (] {, e mto m be-RS \fhf? Ae J I I Public,: Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests Vi RecfoR S!v.f' fj/clor . C~pk+) -!Jt?'M,qr/;S 1fJ5{X.M.)o~'(~/ I7b Ck~1 /), , I)' 'iSSOtJ T c 0 J~DdAc DR' 4~'f?A)S'e.fis~. ~y . , /')0<</05 II? rc00~ rj'CClmO?u/}/A/ ev~ I\l'd (J!)(~;) for UCSil~C to SCl'VC on This Boar'cJ/Cornrnl:'Osiol1/Cornmittcc / . C;r;I/e::... ,PiAl?(!ot ~ 'J~:- 'l/1ft1 ~e..- !foe! ;J1i?fl7/f/as f>7 L'fl7T)I7JV/?/Y ~e '7'2 J€ , r:: /; l " Cl ~h~';'7irY~~ati~~~~~~I'2ed ~~r-thfs 1'if~i'c public upon re~uest. / h p..J (/Jou./c/ be ~efie/H/ '~. // f I L~ 3/ /{p /9d.- DATE Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle County Office Building 40l McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 229a.1r4596 Phone: 296-584~ '.. ....-..:~~-:-:-;..',.:.~. ~ , , "'1 i""'~?:. , ~ { l , I I I Edward H, Bair, Jr, Samuel Miller I David p, Bowrman Charlottesvill Charlotte Y H mphris Jack Jouett , " '_. ,_,r , '....:- " " i i ! LJ Forrest R, Marshall. JL Scottsville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 June 4, 1992 Charles 5, Martin Rivanna Walter F, Perkins White Hall Mr Rudolph A. Beverly 26&1-1 Barracks Road Chrrlottesville, VA 22902 I De~r Mr. Beverly: I I I At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on June 3, 1992, you weee appointed to the Architectural Review Board with said term to ex ire on November l4, 1992, at which time you will be eligible for re ppointment to a full four-year term. I I I I On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity tol express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve t~e County in this capacity. "erelY, tUw~H- David P. Bowerman Chairman l~n/ I I cd: Marcia Joseph The Honorable James L. Camblos, III I I I I Boarq/Conunission/Conunittee ARCHT'l'EC'l'URAT. REVTEW ROARO I APPl~cant's Name Rudolph A. Beverly I Home !Address ?f\A1 1 R;=,rr;='r'kc:: Rr'I?,-'l ('h""rlr'lt-t9'iuill,., Uirginia 22901 Magi~terial District in which your home residence is located Jack Jouett BUSi~ess Address 1611 University Avenue Charlottesville Phone 977-1986 I I Empl~yer NeuPar. Inc. I I I Datelof Employment March, 1984 I I Year$ Resident of Albemarle County 4 yrsPrevious Residence Charlottesville I I I Spou,e's Name I I Educftion (Degrees and Graduation Dates) I I I I I I I Membrrships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups I I I I PUbl~c, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I - ! ., ... ~.t/ '//; " "'4 /' ?1i'i-- ~"'t~ OV C; OF ALee-A, A ~~(~ OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY O......ICE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22e01 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE (Please type or print) Occupation/Title stnrp Mrlnrll)pr Birthdate/Place October 29, 1960 N/A Number of 'Children N/A Attended University of VirginiA 3 years. 1979 throuqh 1982 Sookesper!':on Cnrnpr Mprrhrlnrc:: ~~C::r'lr';?tio~ Member - Albemarle Branch of the NAACP Reason{s) for Desire to Serve on This 'Board/Commission/Committee While attending the University of Virginia, I sat on several architectural committees, and have been interested in the county's development since that time. The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. SIGNATURE A9ril 24. 1992 DATE Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle County Office Building 40l McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 2290l-4596 Phone: 296-584l ,,- n .... ........,.:.,:.. >,~....""...,;:...>,,,.~..._.'d..,~:ff~,.""..-.~__-'"":,""..'....,,,.'.........."'.,,...._-"'..---......._~-____..._........~__~".....".."'W,.......,..!.:....""~__,.,J..-..,;"....;':..'...,;,.::....". ~ .. ". ..' ...~,', &, " , F iISCAL IMPACT COMMI'rrEE N j:unes and Addresses Appointed ITerm Expires City/County ~rs. Ellen I. Andersen 6-3-92 Planning ~620 Kimbrough Circle Commission - ~harlottesville, VA 2290l Samuel Hm 293-9074 Miller Mr. A. Bruce Dotson 6-3-92 Citizen ~282 Whippoorwill Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 Wk 924-l970 Hm 979-7074 Mr. Peter G. Hallock 6-3-92 Citizen p. O. Box l38 Keswick, VA 22947 Wk 973-4402 Hm 293-6704 Mrs. Charlotte Y. Humphris 6-3-92 Board of ~09 Falcon Drive Supervisors - Charlottesville, VA 22901 Jack Jouett Hm 296-7806 Mr. Blake Hurt 6-3-92 Citizen a55 W. Main Street ~harlottesville, VA 22901 Wk 979-5748 Hrn 971-1870 Mr. Tim Lindstrom 6-3-92 Citizen Rt. 7, Box 228 ~harlottesville, VA 22901 Wk 977-2033 Mr. Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. 6-3-92 Board of Rt. 6, Box 305A Supervisors - Charlottesville, VA 22902 Scottsville Wk 293-8111 Hm 295-7038 Mr. Jay McNeely 6-3-92 Citizen Rt. 1, Box 547 ~rozet, VA 22932 Hm 823-2325 William J. Nitchmann 6-3-92 Planning ~. O. Box 2378 Commission Charlottesville, VA 22902 Scottsville Wk 293-4765 Hm 296-6178 I Mr. Dennis S. Rooker 6-3-92 Citizen ~15 S. Pantops Drive ~harlottesville, VA 2290l Wk 977-7424 Hm 973-4774 Mr. Michael K. Semanik 6-3-92 Citizen ~04 Westmoreland Court Charlottesville, VA 2290l Wk 978-7442 Hm 974-6220 r ~....___"",___..........~.....,..."".......:.,~..""",._,.....,...~.~~~._______.._.....___.>-....,._...,...,...._~"",."' "'-""""f'~'''-''''-'''''''''~'''~~~'IO,_.J " FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE ~commended Work Outline: Gpal: To develop a fiscal impact analysis methodology that; · incorporates all planning and growth factors relevant to Albemarle County's current and future growth management; · can be validated, creditable and flexible; · is effective in supporting review of policy issues; · is usable and maintainable by staff; · is fully supported and integrated with the comprehensive plan review process; and (2) is completed no later than March, 1993. Responsibilities for the Committee are: Coordinate information collection and issues identification before model development--receive public input. Review base input to model--demographic, value of real estate, capita1 facility costs, etc.--with consultant. Receive .andreview final ,model product. Identify various land use/economic scenarios for model application--although optional, this is a desirable effort for the committee to undertake because it validates the model and bridges the initial issues identification with the model's application and provides a foundation.of tested scenarios for use by the Planning . Commission . and Board ,of Supervisors in making pOlicy/strategy decisions~ . . s~ecific I i (1) I (3) (4) I I I I I I I I i I . ~rch/Apr1l. 1992: I~ Committee selection TIMELINE: and Formulation of Tasks - Develop the issues and charge for the Committee - Advertise and select Committee Information Gathering, Issue Identification - Review current POlicies and practices -_.._._--_.-------------~---_.-----~_.....--- - Familiari: e the committee with other policies and methodoloc ies in use in other localities - Define th' preliminary issues - Identify consultant service requirements Participa~...ion at public. meetings in identifying issues and concerns - Presentat5.ons to the commit.tee by groups or individuals as appropria ~.:.e June. 1992: III. Develop an Economic Baseline , - Staff, with assistance from outside resources as necessary, will dev€:lop an economic baseline or profile of the County to serve as a foundation for further model development and analysis, Julv/December. 1992: IV. Develop Fil:cal Impact Methodology - As assisted by a consultant and staff, develop a methodology to be used in committee analysis of development policy alternatives and, - Develop c methodology that is inclusive of, and interactive with, all supporting growth management tools to include the Comprehensive Plan, Community Facilities Plan, Open Space Plan, utilities Master Plan and other plans as appropriate. - Develop~'i. methodology to be adopted for continued ,use by County E.t::.aff Januarv/Februar~1993: V. Model Validation and Scenario Testing - Using tie methodology, examine alternative land use and economic forecasts for fiscal impact March~ 1993: VI. Develop rt cOlnmendations and complete the study - Report ", o~.he Board of Supervisors . ~ .. ,I iA. 1 to - ,- !i il I- iI ~ i~ '"" '~ ~ !i 1- ~ ~ ~ --- ----- en :z w :z @ :s '" a- a- ~ en u; >- -' 00:: :z 00:: ~ u i - -' c5 en - .... ~h wli ~ .~ B " Ii-- iil! ----- ii !u D - II _ t i ...&- ----- --- .. ~ - a ij 1- ~i 1------1--- ! ~ j) ---- ~-------- rIl .c i ~- - u .... - .... ..- ~ i .... rIl .c i i i t .. ~ ]~j .... ----- rIl .c i .... .... III ... en i - .. ! jj -0 .... III I .. .... .... .. III "- ... C'o (I) .., i1:~ f:~:; lli N 1----- III s: i 1; i iI N - ___'-_____1- --_I- --- __ i - i " ~ ... I - .. "" C) 0 88 0"0- tit.... f888l' ..... .. .. 11\ 11\ C) ~~tit L L L ~~~ ~ L~;g~J 8 o 8 o .. ~ VI -------- "" -------- II - .a j ~ L II ... .... III C E o ... 11 ~ '.c u rIl is ..- a- Il > - ~ .c II ! II s: ... .... o i: '> II L ... ~ II .c ... .... o II II '6. ;?; L I II s: ... s: ... "i c - II .- ... - - '; . ~~ ... ..... rIl .. i ..... ... ~ j a ~ ... L..__ _____ ________ . ,. , , , I I I I Edward H, Baln, Jr, Samuel MiIl1r David p, Bow~rman Charlottesvillr Charlotte y, Humphris Jack Jouet~ -I i I I I I I I COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 June 8, 1992 Forrest R, Marshall, JL Scottsville Charles S, Martin Rivanna Walter F, Perkins White Hall , Mrl' A. Bruce Dotson 2282 Whippoorwill Road Charlottesville, Virginia I Delar Mr. Dotson: I happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, of your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This Co ittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of Al emarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I h e attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone ers for your information. The first meeting of the Committee has been eduled for Mondav, June 29. 1992. at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference m of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an ction of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be co rdinated through the Department of Planning and Community Development. I enlcourage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. For your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in monitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee to follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for yo r interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status re orts as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you ha e any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction. 22901 Sincerely, ?Jtt</~ I I I I I I DP~/dbm 92.030 At achment I I cc' David P. Bowerman Chairman Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres Delegate Peter T. Way . ~ ~ ~"t~ OV c; OF ALeE'A, e '4~(~ OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY Ol"I"ICE BUILDING fY7 " -7 If f ' J ')V ( . U /-3 CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA IltOl APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE (Please type or print) BoarQ/COIn.'nission/Conll'nittee h,5C<,( I / hlP~~ (-,-- Cr. ).,.~.I~l.l II-<'-e (\ f Appl~cant's Name ~I ,-Bl-L'c~ J.~c1-,:;';.tJ I . i C'\ I ( Home IAddresss:!~'f)~ LJ~;"L5Jt~l''v,.1I td., 07f~jJ I ~ lid .;(;:;<}ol Magi~terial Distri,c~ ~-?:~,A~ht:.~ J'~'Ju;o.~~~~~re~~~,~t~{.:;-iS located S&\i,.\v~1 t~ L tl""l- I -~ ~e ~ -1 ..........t,......'1 tl.t- I..J....... t 1;-1- '.... -.. ..~-~,,"\,; . -"VJ,-, '1-...... h"'t....l PI "'.........."....,,~ _ C:-~'_ ' 0 Busiriess Address C~'h"p(cdi ti,,\\\ v.'-'M,. C~.....iott")~'{'-\,u".,?"<"te..s Phone I~)r-Il/c I I Emplqyer I I I Date lof Employment I Year~ Resident of Albemarle County Ii Previous Residence I ~. Spou~e's Name J./I'\.NC'- I Educ~tion Tl\fD. l) 0 i~ . Occupation/Title ~. , r':'+~:'.5\ ,-' I '1'7~ Birthdate/Place 7/., 0/4J 111,.~r-p(,;,.. rl..r ./< i/ / li-Ic, -l.c......... ' I I ('1~ f~ 'A/, '.. Nnmber of Children -2 --' (Degrees and Graduation Dates) /''1 n . jJ L'L1 d' r\~)(C;A-(I( Ilc,-jvJ-.iv) (' (;0 , . )-J ~ I I \ "-.J '-, ' - , /9' )~ I Memb~rships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups I C_ . ,.~,( I ! Publtc, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests I Cl'-L' t;~L~' ( ~ ,-j.,-L~) C l, U k ( l 1 t, (, 1_, cJ -' '{ . cLeo,. 10t~O(J./4 I ....... <.,' . I ~ <:: '.. (-> k > ~L, U. l. ) , ": I c\. N ~,-' /'- N ,:;,)oc 'c' < 'C"\.' I I I, I I I I ! Reason(s) for Desire to Serve o~-i~is 'Board/Comrnissi9n/Comrnittee I 5 SJ ..> Cl{ C l-~"Jtt l'\"-U C\.L-<- "'v 'f~ t ~{ j,-" "~ c-, "l ' r' ' t'\. )- V ,. s '-~ ,'i L -(\ (.d ')( l.~'t "" t", (.) i,L-t~l {"ll- ('().J,) ,;1 I--'U' , t ( j .... c,: 'v '" ,rIU"U I" ~ The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. " , ,,' 7 ;. T- ll->::c-',0t-/(7 c 1.,(, /---.;,: 1- Iv (~v ~ 7 L 1 ( ( I (, KJ:.)' v (<tl, 0 'v Cc," ",,/.,,' tI...~) ,U/l ~.~^J -'-<.", Lvll,,<~L i\(\( ~/, "->:> -d {L..~ rt'J- h~i !II .,,> Fl-cc <:',;>) ~t 1,0 I,~' /C'YT (" ;,J, L e.J. 3/'5//7/_ / /DA TE Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle County Office Building 40l McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 2290l-4596 Phone: 29 6-584l :f .-,." ..i ~, <./1 (i,) '-'(I Ie) t,-.: ( 'AIr '- f') l--e J l )1'5 (^" 5,..(> t ~,' ( '') ( c "'., ''-' " II~, '--{' , OrAv I 11..,-' 'I I u Ic~, L L, ~l' '- , )v.Jj, , C<. G (T: 'I ~ ) ,1 I f' ; " L "J (:-\( DC" c)t l..G d cj~ ..I. ['- /' I { LL,' ,:){!\,- Ie. <:> L (0 ,I 7 1/'<<:.' ,7 ( L\c I'L. , -- ,t; , Ii i ,,/ i f. (,: "j "'- ,; ~r"'.,,<; \, /' I ! ~~~ ".,', Edward H, Bai , JL Samuel Mille COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 June 8, 1992 Forrest K Marshall, JL Scottsville Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, H mphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins While Hall M . Peter G. Hallock P O. Box 138 K swick, Virginia 22947 o ar",". Il'l1u"k'f?~ : I am happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This mmittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I ve attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone mbers for your information. The first meeting of the Committee has been heduled for Mondav. June 29. 1992. at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference om of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an ection of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be ordinated through the Department of Planning and Community Development. I courage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. r your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in nitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for ur interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status ports as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not sitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you ve any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction. I I I I I I I D!I B/dbm 9 .030 A tachment c: Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Delegate Peter T. Way Sincerely, Z2~erman Chairman Yahres i " ,_~__>'\ .__4 ....., ,,.__-" '-1__- /~;/-'! ;:::/ I"~ c- ,/ -,"' /' ~- / ~~~ oU () OF J. ~:'t)~ j' t~ OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ;) COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA ZZ901 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE (Please type or print) Board/Commission/Committee Fiscal Impact Applicant's Name Peter G. Hallock Home Address P, O. Box 138, Keswick, Va. 22947 Magisterial District in which your home residence is located Rivanna , EmploFer 515 Rio Rd. West, C'ville, Va 22901 Phone 973-4402 ,i/ /J'I' 2 ~3-;6' 7~'ij The Garden spot, Inc. Occupation/Title Owner Business Address , Date pf Employment April 1, 1971 Birthdate/Place 9/18/42 N.Y Yearsl Resident of Albemarle County 34 Previous Residence Rockville, Md Spouse's Name Andrea Hallock Number of Children 3 I Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) B. S. Horticulture, University of Maryland 1968 Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups Keswick Hunt Club, Southwest Mountain Coalition Citizens for Albemarle PubliC, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests Little Keswick School Foundation Board (Treasure), Family service Board, Keswick Hunt Club Board, Cloverfield Trustee, citizens for Albemarle Board Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee The main reason I would like to work on this st~ Is to determine what impact growth has on the county. I own a businesa ~hat thrives on growth. I feel, however, that the impact of qrowth should be measured so that we may see if it is beneficial to the area as a whole. I am lookinQ for an honest, just answer. The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. .;.}, '" /' ,/ "" 1-,l.; SIGNAiu'RE .t ( ,,'c/( V' , , I" ',' L~ J ie, '/ ' . / - / (.' / ..::....- DATE Ret~~n'to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle County'Offide Building. 40l McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596' Phone: 296-5843 . ~ ~ Edward H, Ba n, Jr, Samuel Mill r David p, Bow rman Charlottesvil e Charlotte y, umphris Jack Jouett , .. ".~.~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R, Marshall. Jr, ScottsvilJe Charles S, Martin Rivanna Walter F, Perkins White Hall June 8, 1992 . Blake Hurt 855 West Main StrE - C arlottesville, 'rglnia 22901 Wart , iii~,' mmittee's task bemarle County " ve attached a Ii mbersfor your heduled for Mon' om of the Count ection of ChaiI ordinated throu, courage you to 1 r your informa': nitoring your mE follow its pro. ur interest in f ports as you wo: sitate to contac ve any question B/dbm .030 tachment Senator Edge: Delegate Mit Delegate Pet YJU, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, ntment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This s extremely important to the Board and the citizens of w~ face the growth management challenges of the future. I , cf your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone nfurmation. The first meeting of the Committee has been .~, June 29. 1992. at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference ~ffice Buildinq. The agenda will primarily consist of an and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be ; the Department of Planning and Community Development. I ing your calendars to this first meeting. .oni our State legislators have indicated an interest in tings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee ess and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for rving on this Committee and we look forward to future status t'1ward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you c0flcerning the Committee and its future direction. Sincerely, ~ ~: P. Bowerman Chairman S Robb le j Van Yahres Way / .. t-" . , ,~, .lJ IJ I f 6/3 REPUBLIC CAPITAL CORPORATION P.O. Box 7885 Charlottesville, Va. 22906 i"i. (804) 979-5748 FAX (804) 979-0575 '",;:' t.:.- \ L. Al'ril28,1992 Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC Board of County Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596 Dear Ms. Neher: With respect to your letter of April 20 informing me that I may be notified for an interview for the Fiscal Impact Committee, please be advised that I will be out of town from May 7 through May 22. Should an interview prove necessary, I would appreciate it if you would schedule such an event either before or after these dates. Blake Hurt President /fbm <" -..j ~"c if tiT-' ~I F .72' C'V:f17 ,~2-t:) / ~/ . .. iI. ". ____\"{'l 0 F AL8€/vt (.,00\- "lJi>(~ OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE (Please type or print) , , Board~Commission/Committee f(S('a.Q ~J ~ ApPli~ant 's Name "5/0. k.e W-urt Home Address 301 ~(t(he Lo.M~ I tYllVttDitesvd[€ vA- ZZPtOI ....,-:, . Magisterial District in which your home residence is located ~~LV~4 Busin~ss Address ~ f)6"' ~t Mtt.Ut Sf ~(o+\eSlk lie vA- Phone t19.S-7-cf:E Emploter ~ ~U C .D\10twct2M 1 Occupation/Title l~siU Date 9f Employment t q '62.- Birthdate/Place ~3b C~(t;\(~~vtl\'f? Years! Resident of Albemarle County 2)w Previous Residence ~)\ spous~ 's Name ~ 0 \ Number of Children :5 Educa~ion (Degrees and Graduation Dates) . ArburnlUlt ~~ &100 4! ~13 I l;\4 tAtG~. ~ lq-r:1 ~~ ~ I 1-8 Church and/or Social Groups I Memb1rsh~PS in Fraternal, k~J~ Qb~ Interests d~ cvtd ~. 0bMd ~ 1~~ ~ ~~" ~Cy~~ [~tJi -b~ Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee ~ ~ eM The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. ~ ~ 1 /1~ DATf Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone: 296-5843 , '><:";'-, w:"'~')~.:...:~~<:t><: w:~,'''''''''''"",''''''''''-'''''''',"'..,'",. ..-....'..'w.'.'" ,. "'." ~~'.. .... v ,_.......,...~.. ,F.. ""'_'"". .... "'~''W''''''''''",-...-....' ___"........._"'.....,"""."'...._,.._...,'. ... .', ".. ".'_......_ ".....,.. ....V.., .,.,..'..',."'.",..<<..v>"..:,......""...'V'-,.',.....-"".. ,,~--. " ..' Edward H, Bin, JL Samuel Mill r COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R, Marshall. Jr, ScottsvilJe David p, Bow rman Charlottesvil e Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, umphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall June 8# 1992 D ar ~E . I,';"'AAd.e LI: 01&1. . Tim Lindstrom ute #7, Box 228 arlottesville, Virginia 22901 ~~ happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This mmittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I ve attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone mbers for your information. The first meeting of the Committee has been heduled for Mondav. June 29. 1992. at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference R om of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an election of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be c ordinated through the Department of Planning and Community Development. I e courage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. r your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in nitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for r interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status re orts as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you h e any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction. Sincerely, Q~man Chairman DP jdbm 92.030 At achment cc: Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres Delegate Peter T. Way . /' .--.,.. //, "A/> /, ~.L , V ~ /,. / './ ,," r ~~~ OF 000 OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE (Please type or print) Board Commission/Commi tte~ t="""LSC~ 1 ~ \M.- \t)~J- AV\-..... ~ S'lli {p lIk~ \ H ~ o€- t- \ Appli ant's Name G......,. L\~ l $ +-r-P"^""'- Home ddress .12- 1 ~ I ~,,~ "l-'L-S C--{.",..V 1> ~ t;~~ \/'f:t-. 'l-~"'l D( Magis erial District in which your home residence is located ):::1 J#\..o1.lA.A. ss Address \17 \0 H-PII'V~~ ~t.J C-.'l, 2-L.--40\ Phone C:;/?-LD~~ er ~~ JIM-P,,", t 2.~v,..-v.....~ -tJ {Ou-IA.J Occupation/Title S!t-A. If 'A.lfp'V~ L ~ ~ \~ (~ 1k'.4- l.... Date f Employment J\A '( \t1 ~ Birthdate/Place \'2.-] l"LJ'-\-b Resident of Albemarle County 2...2- Previous Residence ;t. c..oe.-- k L~4 ""'\. 's Name ~-e$~ l~ . {.1A V... \~1'L . A ~L.I;\V\: ~ Number of Children ~ {7"'-<- . B.A. \>o\~ l~.Jl 'St:-~~ tc~ C U 1.J /J e- t:J:;;.{J Vt ~ 2-. 14 h '1 ion (Degrees and Graduation Dates) ships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups \~~k ~ -.i ~,.c..." , 8~ \f\..., and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests ~ CS~~L-1 Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee A-J.e~;.r~ 1, s.e~ 0. \'M(.""'L4~IACC"''''''''''(-L. QA.. J 'f>>.r+~~,~-f 1J.f(J.r~ .b tk:\ ~vv'~+- ~. ~'^ ~~\ ~-c.. ~.{- ~ t~ ~~ k f.eve.~I.~.Lcl tt--$ '\M.( 'b~0l.~" ~ ~l'3SI.L.lZ- --( 9V'?w1L ~V-~A iLl d4P The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. Wti\ '" 4- +,;. .(.e .e a '-\.. c. CC- f.l(.V'"eI,. {<- .It s So ess~./\--- tv- ..e.-v ~ -1-- ~ -+\.S~~ "w-i~ 4- ~t~- w~v- v(- \4.' '"-l 5~. 1;- ~ -A:!: 0 ~ /~ /,,--~ c1dv.e- '5~vL ~~~s. ~ SIGNATURE "^ av.e.- .s~ ~ ~ -f V'O Le..-<' S. t..t ) '\ } G:i ')..- J;"""' a '^"- '1": \ k -{'CP'''''' \ 1 \~,- ~ t ~ ~ nlTE ,L~uv-~ l~r\;\ ~~ ct ~ 1~--e ~ ~ Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone: 296-584~ ~- /7//),f r/l,/&; ~ iL, //1, c--/.... /) Edward H, Bai , JL Samuel Mille COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R, Marshall, JL Scottsville David p, Bow rman Charlottesvill Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, H mphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins While Hall June 8, 1992 . Jay MCNeely ute #1, Box 547 ozet, Virginia 22932 ar Mr. McNeely: am happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This mmittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I ve attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone mbers for your information. The first meeting of the Committee has been heduled for Mondav. June 29, 1992. at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference om of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an ection of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be ordinated through the Department of Planning and Community Development. I courage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. r your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in nitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for ur interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status ports as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not sitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you ve any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction. Sincerely, v;/d5'~ David P. Bowerman Chairman D B/dbm 9 .030 A tachment c Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres Delegate Peter T. Way I' , .-/ .. : L; It ~' F t:.F"=/)fl fif'l I 'L, r::llrli , . ReasonCs) for Desire to Serve on This Board/CommiBSion/C()rl1inittee , , , --;----- ._--,,---~_..-._---.--~...:._-~-~, -....:..1..--.:.-\ _\___ C__~_(_, ~__.~~:__ _..__._.~__..:.._ .:.., .....,...... ,__._~_' I I I . . \ . t r, ) I \ ( ,.. -~------. ...,..~., ._. .........'...~._~-,., ...'- ~...,----_."-""--;--..__..----._~- -~'''-'''"-'-'"-''''--~'~-I-.''-'-'-----'-",-,--,~.",. "'___'",,_,_,.., '~',_ ___"......"....~..,,__ ~---"--. -... - .'~ ,-....... .. ...-...... - .'..-....--......-. "...,_........... ."....._" --......--., -----..'..-...,""-.-.-..-........, -,....._'.-~..._,._.,.,. -." ... ........... -~....~......'.'_.~._.._.,,,.,~.,,.'> The informallcn provided on thiB application will be released to the publir upOn re1u0At. , I -.........-- 4- . "_A-S'TGlJA1'UR1~ - '--.--rrATt-- .,.. Fe turn t..,: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of SUpm _; :'5 Cctmt y of Albemal'le County Ofrice Building 401 McIntire Road ChdrlClt:tesvilll! t ViI'ginia 2290'1-4596 Phone: 296-5843 - ~ Edward H, Ba n, Jr, Samuel Mill r COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843. FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest K Marshall, JL Scottsville David p, Bow rman Charlottesvil Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, umphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall June 8, 1992 . Dennis S. Rooker 5 S. Pantops Drive arlottesville, Virginia 22901 D Rgelter. -z;~ am happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This mmittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I ve attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone mbers for your information. The first meeting of the Committee has been heduled for Mondav. June 29. 1992. at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference om of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an ection of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be ordinated through the Department of Planning and Community Development. I courage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. r your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in nitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for ur interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status ports as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not sitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you ve any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction. nrelY, ~~~rman Chairman D 9 A c Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres Delegate Peter T. Way .,.' 1t 6-~'~? /~A1_ ~"'{~ 00 () OF OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 2.2.901 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE (Please type or print) I I I I I Board1Commission/Committe~ Fiscal Impact Study Commission I I Appli~antts Name Dennis S. Rooker I I Home .ddress ~800 Roslyn Ridge Rd. CIVille, VA 22901 I I Magisterial District in which your home residence is located Busin~ss Address I 115 S. Parrtopo Dr. C'Ville/ VA 22901 Phone 977-7424 Emploter President of Law Firm Occupation/Title Pres'. , Date bf Employment 1986-Present I I I Years I Resident of Albemarle County I I Birthdate/Place S. Haven, Mich. 23 Previous Residence Pulaski, VA I Spousf t s Name Ann Number of Children 2 I I Educa~ion (Degrees and Graduation Dates) I 1VA B.A. 1972 ! I 1 I I. Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups I Memb Ir of VA State Bar, W. VA State Bar, Florida Bar Assoc, UVA J.D. 1976 Memb r of American Bar Assoc., Member of Business Tax Real Property & Lltlgatlon and Special Bar Sections I PUblib, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests I I Mem~er of The Church of Our Savior Episcopal Church, Charlottesville/ I I Albdmarle Metro. Plan. Organization-Technical Committee, Owner of Den~is S. Rooker, P.C. (law firm), The Media Group, Inc. (investment ban ing firm); Evergreen Newspapers, Inc. (which owns 5 newspapers in Denwer CO area.) Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee I am interested in making certain that the county's comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance adequately take into consideration the benefits and/or costs associated with commercial, industrial and residential growth. The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. c:r;L~. /~ ' SIGNATURE ~'-- 4/7/92 DATE Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle County Office Building 40l McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone: 296-5843 ,-.. - _... -..------------..+--..-.....-___,..-____.....,.,..... ~ ..'~.,_ ,..O/.......'"-...,....',..,_._~ ~ ", ~ . Edward H, Bai , JL Samuel Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R, Marshall, JL Scottsville David p, Bowe man Charlottesville Charles S, Marlin Rivanna Charlotte Y H mphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall June 8, 1992 M . Michael K. Seminak 4 4 Westmoreland Court C arlottesville, Virginia 22901 D ar Mr. Seminak: am happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Conunittee. This nunittee' s task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I ve attached a list of your fellow conunittee members, their addresses and phone mbers for your information. The first meeting of the Conunittee has been heduled for Mondav. June 29. 1992, at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference om of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an ection of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be ordinated through the Department of Planning and Conununity Development. I courage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. r your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in nitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Conunittee follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for ur interest in serving on this Conunittee and we look forward to future status ports as you work toward a final reconunendation for the Board. Please do not sitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you ve any questions concerning the Conunittee and its future direction. Sincerely, Q~~~ Chairman D B/dbm 9 .030 A tachment c Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres Delegate Peter T. Way .. ~;')C epl / ' i " ...-" " t-\"{~ OF (jOV . OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE (Please type or print) d/Commission/Committee ~ \ ~<:.~ \... \ 'f't\ ~~c\ CO'N\M '~t.'E. ('r\\c..'t-\~~\- ~. ~'E ""''''N ,"- Address '"\0\4 ,^.h~-:'\N"o~:t:_ \...~N ~ CO~~) c.,-, "It U ~) \J~ 'Z"Z..<\ 0 \ sterial District in which your home residence is located C~~~L01rE~~\~ ness Address 1>.0 .-go~ ~'Z..\\) (",,' \I \U-~) V.... z '2.<:\0(0 Phone ~1 e , l.f4 z.. oyer \1t.\\.)M,"",", ~~'S.oc.\ ~\tc:, \.- \"'=> Occupation/Title ~~~~ft't 10u:"e, of Employment \~ b\:)<;'\""e.'$~ S\~C.e.. \C\B\ Birthdate/Place 3\2.S \4)'2. ~~~a;~ s Resident of Albemarle County \ <\ Previous Residence "'P\o\\\..~bl:.~I~ - \ ~ \S\A Number of Children L..\ ation (Degrees and Graduation Dates) ~c.o~o",^\c.~ - ~"'Cl."C~ <5~~oo\.. ~ ~\~,,~cc. - \) . e'" ~NN~. - \)kQ.~'E~ SC\\t>O\.. - 0N''l 'C.nOS\""\'" o~ \J \~G,\~\'" in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups ~~'" ~"n.c..", Jt \\..e 1: ~c..~~~ ",,\O~ C ~OL S~NO~~ \~'J\E\U ~W\M. Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests (OM.N'\'V~H' ~~~~"ON ~~\J\~O(l.. "...1:: \.-~ - C. '" "'" U> 'ES \) 1 \...\.."E. o,\"n,.: (\-U 'a - 'b\~lQ\C\ ):\N fl<NlC-ce... Co~", \ tc - '60," <;CO"""~ \c...\:.. C,""tz..M.~ - \...t~b'e.Q..$.'t\'~ ("f\~~\"!)~~\J \u..~ ~\-\)N\~ \ ~~~. Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee Y\t~,t. See. ~i\~e"-..~ -N\~-\e~\~\~ The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. ~ ~E~~~ <<{ \ '1 \ <l.'-. DATE Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone: 296-5841 ~ ' 404 Westmoreland Court Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 April 6, 1992 TO: Members of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors FROM: Michael K. Semanik RE: Application for the Fiscal Impact Committee No one, myself included, could live and work in Albemarle County for 19 years without developing an opinion about our economic growth. I have often commented that no side in the on-going debate has provided an objective method for analyzing and managing the growth process. Depending on the prevailing political winds you may be managing towards negative growth (i.e. 'downsizing'), aggressive growth (unlikely), or any point in between. But in my opinion, we would all be better served if the management of the growth process, whatever the goal, was based on objective, reliable data about the cost and benefits of the alternatives under consideration. The Fiscal Impact Committee sounds like the core for such an analytical system. Please take a moment to review my product bulletin ("Informed Decisions"). It is normally inserted in a brochure of my consulting services. It illustrates my practice of providing small business owners with the tools they need to sort through complex management decisions. I don't make the decisions. I help my clients understand their options. They make the decisions. My bio and application indicate my continuing desire to participate in community affairs. In fact, when coupled with my parental involvement in school, soccer, little league, den meetings and swim team, I'm a little surprised to find myself volunteering. But I was so pleased to see the Board approaching the issue of growth from this perspective, that I'd like to be part of it. Michael K. Semanik 404 Westmoreland Court Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 804 978 7442 Professional Activities: I 1981 - Date: President - Triumph Associates, Ltd 1978 - Date: Consultant - Sterling Institute 1980 -1988: Associate Broker - Alcova Realty, Inc. 1987 - 1988: President - CJS, Inc. (Triumph client) 1986 - 1987: General Manager - Riverview Cemetery Corp. (Triumph client) 1982 - 1985: C.E.O. - Monticello Dairy, Inc. (Triumph client) 1976 - 1978: Instructor - Colgate Darden Graduate School of Business 1975 - 1976: Controller - Ridge Electronics Corp. Eduqational Activities: 1975 MBA Degree The Colgate Darden Graduate School of Business University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va. 1973 BS in Economics The Wharton School of Finance University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. Persdnal Activities: Born: March 25, 1952; Married: May 31, 1979; Four children; Health: Excellent President-Elect, Charlottesville Rotary Club i Chairman, Monticello District Finance Committee, Boy Scouts of America : Past Chairman, Community Attention Advisory Board of Charlottesville Past Chairman, University of Pennsylvania's Secondary School Committee Past Vice-Chairman, Leadership Charlottesville Alumni Association Member, The Darden School Sponsors Member, Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity . INFORMED DECISIONS Everyone defines the proper balance between expected risk and return according to instinctual preferences. Not everyone has the time or the skills to quantify and thoroughly analyze all their options. Triumph Associates does, and more. TAL's computer simulations of business and investment situations can simplify a difficult choice from complex financial alternatives. You still make the decision, but with the satisfaction of knowing: · all reasonable alternatives have been considered, · the potential risks and returns of each alternative have been clearly identified, quantified and compared, · your choice best meets your preferences on risk and return. Our simulations have helped business owners contemplating changes in the organization and mission of their company, such as · evaluating the benefits and costs of a new production process, · refining a new marketing strategy or product introduction, · determining the effects of changes in their product mix, · testing various pricing strategies, · developing pro formas for a franchise offering, · testing the effects of various stock redemption strategies. Our simulations have also helped investors by: · evaluating the feasibility of planned real estate projects, · determining the optimal tenant mix for a commercial development, · measuring the effects on the original sellers while negotiating the default of a multi-million dollar real estate deal. Our experience as operating managers of numerous closely-held companies enables us to look beyond the basic financial information to gauge the impact of problems and opportunities in such areas as operations, marketing, personnel, or trends in the industry and local economy. By working with a computerized simulation of the subject's flows and balances, we identify which assumptions have the greatest effect on performance. If requested, TAL can independently research these critical assumptions to establish their most likely values. And you will be able to manage your investment more effectively by knowing where the greatest pitfalls lie. And, best of all, you avoid many tedious hours with a calculator and accounting pad or many frustrating hours trying to fit your unique facts into mass-produced software. NEGOTIATIONS One of the most effective uses of a TAL simulation is in support of active negotiations. As offer and counter-offer are made, you can quickly test the effect on your position. And, you can pre-test your proposals to see the effect on the other side. Being able to demonstrate in a clear, concise manner, the likely effect of your proposals on the opposition, can have a dramatically persuasive effect. FEFS For our simulation services we charge a fixed fee or a per diem plus expenses depending on the complexity of the situation. Initial consultations are confidential and without obligation. Edward H, Ba'n, JL Samuel Mille COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R, Marshall, Jr, Scottsville David p, Bow rman Charlottesvill Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, umphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall June 8, 1992 M . William J. Nitchmann P. O. Box 2378 C arlottesville, Virginia 22902 Ni~ehmaRR~~~ am happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This mmittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I ve attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone mbers for your information. The first meeting of the Committee has been heduled for Mondav. June 29. 1992. at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference om of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an ection of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be ordinated through the Department of Planning and Community Development. I courage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. r your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in nitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for ur interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status ports as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not sitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you ve any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction. Sincerely, o~g~~ David P. Bowerman Chairman B/dbm .030 tachment Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres Delegate Peter T. Way " < 'l": ,.:.,... .......,..,.~,..-................,.-.::'f.....,......-...'"__.-. '~,>-..'..,..... ..', '~'-""..'."'>-'''''....._,',.'~.' "'-'V,,'.. , c' q, t 1 ; ":\.~_~ ",,-.....,' , \ I l 1 ;~ ~ ~_JI Edward H, Bai~, JL Samuel MiI1e~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Oonest R, MarshalL Jr, Scottsville David p, Bowetman Charlottesvill~ I Charlotte y, H~mphris Jack Jouett Charies 5, Martin Rivanna Walter F, Perkins White Hall June 8, 1992 M!S. Ellen I. Anderson 2 20 Kimbrough Circle C,arlottesville, Virginia , D~ar Mrs. Anderson: 22901 I 'am happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, o~ your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This c~mmittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of A bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I h ve attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone n mbers for your information. The first meeting of the Committee has been s heduled for Mondav. June 29. 1992. at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference R om of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an e ection of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be cqordinated through the Department of Planning and Community Development. I eqcourage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. I Fqr your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in mqnitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee tq follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for yqur interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status r~ports as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not h~sitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you h~ve any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction. Sincerely, Q<<@1fn~r Chairman I I DIlBfdbm 9~.030 Atjtachment I I cq: Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres Delegate Peter T. Way Edward H, Bai , JL Samuel Mille COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R, MarshalL JL SCOtl5viIJe David p, Bow rman Charlottesvill Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, H mphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins While Hall June 8, 1992 . Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. ute #6, Box 30S-A arlottesville, Virginia 22902 uar8h~lt: ~ am happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This mmittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I ve attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone mbers for your information. The first meeting of the Committee has been heduled for Mondav. June 29. 1992. at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference om of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an ection of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be ordinated through the Department of Planning and Community Development. I courage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. r your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in nitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for ur interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status ports as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not sitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you ve any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction. Sincerely, o~ David P. Bowerman Chairman D B/dbm 9 .030 A tachment c Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres Delegate Peter T. Way ) Edward H, Bain, JL Samuel Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 June 8, 1992 Forrest R, Marshall. JL Scottsville David p, Bowerman Charlottesvill~ Charlotte y, H~mphris Jack Jouett I Charles S, Martin Rivanna Walter F, Perkins White Hall M~s. Charlotte Y. Humphris 1@9 Falcon Drive, Colthurst Cfuarlottesville, Virginia 22901 ~~ DEilar Mrlil I W\jHl~lU'iB , I lam happy to inform you, on behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, ot your recent appointment to the Albemarle County Fiscal Impact Committee. This Ccpmmittee's task is extremely important to the Board and the citizens of A+bemarle County as we face the growth management challenges of the future. I h~ve attached a list of your fellow committee members, their addresses and phone n~mbers for your information. The first meeting of the Committee has been s~heduled for Monday, June 29, 1992, at 3:30 p.m. in the 4th Floor Conference R om of the Count Office Buildin. The agenda will primarily consist of an e ection of Chair and Vice-Chair and orientation. Future meetings will be c~ordinated through the Department of Planning and Community Development. I e~courage you to bring your calendars to this first meeting. I Fqr your information, our State legislators have indicated an interest in mqnitoring your meetings. They will be invited to all meetings of the Committee tq follow its progress and to provide support as needed. Again, thank you for yqur interest in serving on this Committee and we look forward to future status r~ports as you work toward a final recommendation for the Board. Please do not h~sitate to contact Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, or me should you h~ve any questions concerning the Committee and its future direction. Sincerely, v~ David P. Bowerman Chairman DFB/dbm 92.030 A~tachment cd: I , Senator Edgar S. Robb Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres Delegate Peter T. Way -:-.:>0( '; '/' ,;.' (/: ( J' j ~k--, ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Office of the School Board 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 ' i ,f ./ Ji < May 18, 1992 Mr. David Bowerman ~hairman, Board of Supervisors 40l McIntire Road ~harlottesville, VA 22902 Jpear Dave, I am writing concerning health services in the Albemarle ~ounty Schools provided by the Public Health Department. On May 11, 1992 the Albemarle County School Board approved the services ~y a vote of 6 to 1 and recommends that the Board of Supervisors ~lso approve the services since the Health Department receives funding from your Board. As you know, the Public Health nurses under the auspices of the Thomas Jefferson Health District have provided services to ,lementary and middle schools for many years. These services tnclude many health screenings which the Albemarle County School Eoard thinks are valuable and important. Since our records do ~ot indicate when this practice began, we would like the Supervisors to reaffirm that arrangement with the Health IDepartment as part of this issue. In addition, last year's budget reductions in the school division caused the loss of the school nurse positions at 41bemarle and Western Albemarle High Schools. The Board directed the Superintendent to seek cooperation with the Health Department to cover that situation. As a result, the high schools made a ~orking agreement that involves a health clinic assistant hired ~y the high schools, and visits to the high schools by the public ~ealth nurse. For Western Albemarle High School, the Public $ealth nurse visits two (2) hours per week. For Albemarle High School, the Public Health nurse was originally scheduled for two (2) hours per week, but since the demand was high, AHS has had two Public Health nurses work about two (2) hours per week, for a total of about four (4) hours coverage. Murray High School does not have a formal schedule because of its proximity to the Health ~epartment. In a memo attached (Attachment 1) from Dr. Susan McLeod to Dr. Carole A. Hastings, Dr. McLeod indicates on the second page that for the last two months, the public health "We Expect Success" -2- nurses "have averaged about 7.5 hours per week of nursing services provided to students in the County high schools." The Albemarle County School Board has had extensive discussion concerning the Public Health nurses and the services they provide. I have attached (Attachment 2) a series of questions concerning the duties of the Public Health nurses in the high schools. The answers were compiled by a team which tncluded Acting Superintendent Carole Hastings, the three high $chool principals and Dr. Susan McLeod. Finally, the Albemarle County School Board wishes to inform the Board of Supervisors that our discussions of this matter included the assumption that although the Public Health nurses ~re ultimately directed and supervised by Dr. McLeod of the Thomas Jefferson Health District, the school division will monitor, guide and evaluate the cooperative arrangement. If the $oard of Supervisors wishes to discuss this issue at the joint meeting scheduled on June 3, we would be glad to do so. , ~~Qw ~~ W. Haury Chairman ~WH/cs I A'ITACHMENI' 1 IN COOP RATION WITH THE STATEDEP RTMENTOFHEALTH COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Thomas Jefferson Health Distn'ct 1138 Rose Hill Drive p. 0. Box 7546 Charlottesville, Virginia 22906 (804) 972-6219 ALBEMARLE - CHARLOTTESVILLE FLUVANNA COUNTY (PALMYRA) GREENE COUNTY (STANARDSVILLE) LOUISA COUNTY (LOUISA) NELSON COUNTY (LOVINGSTON) EMORANDUM Carole A. Hastings, Acting Superintendent Albemarle County Schools ROM: Susan L. McLeod, MD, MPH, Direct~~ Thomas Jefferson Health Districto'- April 21, 1992 UBJECT: Information for the School Board I would like to provide the following information to ddress some of the concerns expressed by the school board at its pril 6 meeting. Together with the answers to parents' questions hich we discussed at our meeting on April 20, I believe this ill provide complete information on the activities of public ealth nurses in the county high schools. The health department has a large number of programs for hich it is responsible. The provision of school nurses is not a asic program of the Virginia Health Department. No additional taff or funds were made available to support a new school nurse rogram in Albemarle County or elsewhere. Therefore, the only ay we are able to assist the schools is to carry out our own rograms in conjunction with the schools. The health department was invited late last summer to stablish satellite offices in the two larger high schools for erving students who might need access to public health nursing ervices. We agreed to the offer with the understanding that tudents could be provided generally the same services in school hat the public health nurse would have provided elsewhere in the ommunity. The nurses chose in discussion with the principals ot to do pregnancy tests and not to provide contraceptives at he school because of the sensitivity of those services. RECE\VEO APR 2 '2 \992 'r/DHVIRGINIA '/ J DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Prolf"f.'tinn You dnd Your Em';ronmf"nl P ,~ .... i I"'\er.t erSOIl; .C: U t-~. The public health nurses are supervised by a public health nursing supervisor and she by a public health nursing manager, b th of whom were involved in the arrangements made with the high school principals. Public health nurses are professionals and are accountable for their own actions. Ultimately the local health director and the Commonwealth of Virginia as the e ployer are accountable. The nurses provide assessment and health counseling on the wide variety of health problems that students present. A large percentage of these are related to sexuality and birth control but that is by no means the only health concern with which they deal. Pregnant students may receive special health guidance throughout their pregnancy. General health information and a vice is provided to any student and questions are answered. Adolescents are very aware of their own bodies and have many that they simply want to discuss with someone knowledgeable about the body and health. The nurse is someone whom they feel safe and comfortable in doing this. The original schedule was for one public health nurse to visit each of the two major high schools on a weekly basis for two hours. The number of referrals at AHS quickly led to the n ed to add a second nurse on a regular basis. Additional time is given for follow-up of vision and hearing screenings. The s hool staff have been aware of the nurses' schedules which are n t always uniform in amount of time devoted each week. One n rse also works with Murray on a more informal and as-needed sis. These same nurses, or perhaps other public health nurses, sometimes asked to work with teachers to provide instruction classes or in informal groups. When applicable to the s bject, the Family Life Curriculum is followed. This is no d'fferent than when the schools had their own nurses although s me requests for help are more frequent now. The other nursing s rvices of individual assessment and health counseling, etc., b ar no specific relationship to any curriculum and even if the t pic is one covered in a curriculum, it is not referenced. The cost for one hour of a public health nurse's erages about $17.00 including benefits and support. For st two months the public health nurses have averaged about urs per week of nursing services provided to students in ree county high schoo Is. Add ing in meet ings, preparation time the 7.5 the and The principals that asked for public health nurses to come to their schools are well aware of the health concerns and eds of their students. They have allowed the nurses to nction as professionals to do their jobs in much the same way, my understanding, as they did previously with their own ployees. Although constrained by the needs and demands of many blic health programs, the nurses try to respond to reasonable r quests from school staff. However, they are there to do their j bs as public health nurses, not serve as school nurses. g oup or class instructional time which is quite var~able t~roughout the year about 350 hours or nearly $6,000 of PHN time i~ used. As long as the services remain a part of basic public h~alth programs, state funds which the health department receives p y nearly $3300 of the cost leaving only $2700 to come from the f~nds which the county provides to the health department. Each county school, but especially the high schools, needs i s own full-time nurse. The school board and school staff s~ould not be satisfied with any temporary solution that provides l~ss. However, the health department is willing to work with the s ~hools to provide some temporary assistance as long as we can m~et the needs of our own programs through the relationship. S~M/sdr ATI'ACHMENT 2 DRAFT QUESTIONS CONCERNING DUTIES OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOLS 1. are students seen by the Health Department Personnel? Do they came in on their or are they requested to came in? At Albemarle High School and Western Albemarle High School, students are usually s en by the clinic assistant first. If s~e feels the nurse is needed or the student a ks to see the nurse, an appointment is arranged. Sometimes students come in to s e the nurse when they know the nurse is there. A few students are asked to corne when a teacher or another student indicates to the nurse or clinic aide that the udent might need the nurse's help. Some students are requested to visit the nurse sed on a referral for follow-up she has received from a doctor or the doctor's s aff including UVA and health department clinics. At Murray High School, students a e seen on a self referral basis. 2. consent or notification made at this point? rents are not normally notified unless the nurse feels the student needs medical c re or other services for which the parent's permission and/or help is needed. The s udent is involved in the notification decision and process. Students are e couraged to talk with their parents about health concerns including decisions a out birth control. 3. e tests for STDI s performed by the Health Department Personnel at the school? e pregnancy tests performed by the Health DePartment Personnel at the school? Pregnancy tests have not been done at school although, to date, specimens have been ~ ken from one school and tested at the Health Department. 4. D tests are not done at school and could not normally be accomplished outside of a derately equipped medical clinic which the schools do not have. 5. positive for either the pregnancy or STD tests, what happens next? A: Pregnancy: If a specimen was taken from school to the Health Department for testing, the student would be informed of the test results by the Public Health Nurse. B: STD: Please refer to question #4; no testing for STD's is performed. 6. e parents notified of these results? Please refer to question #2. Page 2 DRAFT 7. e students taken frcm school during school hours by the Public Health Personnel or presentative for referral to Health Department or other agencies or clinics? 8. 9. 10. 11. rses never transport any patients anywhere in the community except in extreme e ergency. They would never take a student from school. The only health department s aff authorized to transport clients would pick-up a student on school grounds only if the student had complied with school policy for leaving during school hours. T is has rarely happened over a number of years. e parents notified if this occurs? regarding transporting of students is followed (refer to number 7 referred for abortion by the Public Health Personnel? arrangements are made for any student to have an abortion, however PH nurses w uld provide information on all legal options for dealing with a problem pregnancy if confronted with a student who needed that information. A student may ask for help in the process of making a decision and have questions about one particular tion or another that she is considering. Explaining the "how and why" of making a ecision is sometimes needed. An attempt is always made to answer any health est ion that a student asks a nurse. Students are always encouraged to talk with their parents about any such matters. taken from school during school hours for an abortion by Health Department or school personnel, anyone other than their parents? Neither the schools nor the Health Department make arrangements for abortions. ransportation is not provided or arranged for this purpose. e contraceptives, including birth control pill prescriptions, being distributed on chool grounds by Health Department Personnel or being provided in any manner to tudents? No contraceptives (prescription or non-prescription) are distributed on school grounds. PH nurses work in the community and may provide contraceptives to clients On the community some of whom are probably students. Page 3 DRAFT 12. W at literature or brochures are being distributed by Health Department Personnel by t'tle. Has the Superintendent approved any of these brochures or literature in the s hools? What is the relationship to Family Life curriculum? 13. 14. m-92041 LOterature provided by a PH nurse to an individual student to meet the student's s ecific need is labeled for that student and is taken from health department many of which will not have been available for school approval. Any that is presented by the Pllbli.c Health Nurse as part of a Family Life Class reviewed by the principal and approved for use in this program. re any of the above procedures performed by the former school nurses employed the school system last year? e public health nurses are dealing with many of the same problems in the same way at the school nurses did. Nursing interventions are basic regardless of employer. e major differences in service is the time that the former school nurses were a ailable vs. that of a limited schedule provided by the Public Health Nurses. I requested in writing to the high school my children attend, that Health partment nurses were not to consult with or treat my children unless authorized by self or their father, except in the case of an accident or emerqency, would my est be honored? the best of our ability while on school grounds, the PH nurses will honor w atever restrictions the pa~ents wish to be applied. In the community, PH nurses f llow state law which provides for minors to have access to certain health care wOthout parental consent. / ' ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY MEMO T(): Jo Higgins, Engineering Departme F R () t\V1 : J . W . Brent, Executive Director DATE: May 21, 1992 RE: Crozet Crossing Attached please find the Crozet Crossing Agreement , between Albemarle County Service Authority and the County of Albemarle. This agreement has been approved and execut- ed by the Board of Directors. Please have the County approve this agreement and return a copy to me for our records. J.W.B JWB/lbt THIS AGREEMENT, made this 21d day Of;1/d0'1 . 1992, by and between the Albemarle County Service Au~reafter f:alled the "Authority," and the County of Albemarle, hereafter called the "Developer"; WIT N ESE T H: Factual Background: (A) The Authority has adopted a policy ~egarding oversize water and sewer mains, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". (B) The Developer proposes to construct a water line to serve property on u.s. Route 240 known as Crozet Crossing, hereinafter jr'eferred to as the "Project," shown on a plan/profile by Roudabush, Gale and Associates, Inc. entitled "Water and Sewer Plan & Profile, jPhase I, Crozet Crossing at Crozet" dated September 17, 1991, with ~atest revision December 7, 1991, hereinafter referred to as the "Plans and Specifications." (C) The Authority has required the Developer to install a !twelve (12) inch line, from an existing RWSA 12" water line, traveling along Cling Lane approximately 1200' to Station 7+00, ilarger than the eight inch line necessary to serve the Developer's !property. (D) From Station 7+00 to an existing 6" water line in Peach ~ree Drive, Orchard Acres, the Authority has determined the need to ~ave installed a twelve (12) inch water line to increase flows and fire protection in that area. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements hereafter set forth, the Authority and ~he Developer do agree as follows: (1) The Authority agrees to participate in the Project in the ~anner and subject to the conditions described in this Agreement. (2) The Developer agrees to be solely responsible for all ~spects of the construction Project, which shall be performed in ~ompliance with all applicable federal, state and local ~equirements, Authority rules and regulations, and the Plans and ~pecifications. (3) The Developer certifies that all required federal, state and local government approvals of both the Developer's building wroject and the Project have been obtained by the Developer and 4elivered in writing to the Authority. (4) The Project shall be publicly bid. Unit prices shall be $btained for both the size line required by the Authority and the $ize line adequate to serve the needs of the Developer. The Authority shall bear the difference in such cost, from the 12" water line in cling Lane to Station 7+00, and shall bear all tonstruction costs for that portion of line continuing from Station 1+00 to its point of termination at the 6" water line existing in Peach Tree Drive (approximately 600 feet). The nature of the <r::rozet Crossing project is such that the water line work may be!JJ ~warded to someone other than the low bidder as determined by the ~~. <:ieveloper, however, conditions outlined in paragraph ~below will ~~ apply. ~~) ~ (5) During progress of the work, the members of the Authority or their authorized engineers and inspectors shall have access to the location of construction for the purpose of establishing to their satisfaction that the Project is being constructed to the )\uthority's requirements and in accordance with the Plans and ppecifications. (6) Upon completion of the Project in conformance with the Authority's requirements and the Plans and Specifications, the I ~uthority shall reimburse the Developer for the additional cost of , the oversized section of line, and shall reimburse the Developer ~or the total cost of the section of line extended beyond his heeds. Reimbursement shall be based on the low bid water line prices (Bid Form Item #2) determined during the public bid, and shall include only. the amounts paid to contractors for labor and ~aterials and shall not include administrative, engineering, or legal fees. Reimbursement shall be based upon final field measurement of pipe. (7) All customers served pustomers of the Authority and through the Project shall be shall pay all then-applicable 2 i\uthori ty rates, fees and charges, including water and sewer ponnection fees. Further, all customers served through the Project ~hall be subject to all applicable Authority rules and regulations. I ~othing in this Agreement is intended to preclude the Authority I from operating within constraints which are now imposed, pr which may be imposed, by any governmental body, agency, or authority, without any legal liability to the Authority. I . (8) The Developer agrees to name the Authority as an additional insured for purposes of this agreement on its I ~omprehensive general liability insurance policy for the term of this work for at least $1,000,000 in coverage. (9) The Developer shall guarantee all materials and ~orkmanship on the Project for a period of one (1) year from date lof final acceptance by the Authority into the Authority's utility , isystem. , , (10) This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the I ibenefit of all parties hereto and their respective successors and I I iassigns. (11) This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the Iparties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained herein. I iThere are no restrictions, promises, warranties, covenants, or !undertakings other than those expressly set forth herein. This , IAgreement supersedes all prior agreements and understandings I I ibetween the Developer and the Authority with respect to the subject I imatter hereof. This Agreement may not be amended except by a Iwriting executed by all parties hereto. (12) No waiver of any default by the Developer or the :Authority with respect to this Agreement shall act as a waiver of any subsequent default. 3 . . WITNESS the following signatures and seals: ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY By rRcL.Ee ~ Robert R. Humphri , Chairman By Rober ~TATE OF VIRGINIA -k::ITY/COUNTY OF CL\heJYlCd \-e./ I The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me by Robert ~. Humphris, Chairman, Albemarle County Service Authority Board of !Directors, this ;:::y \ 'Sl- day of ('(\~ ' 1992. cf\ UJO- 0>. ~01' X ~-l Notary Public My commission expires: , 3\"3I\Lito , is TATE OF VIRGINIAAI b /.1 ~/COUNTY OF -tn<....tu IK-- The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me by Robert ~; ,-ihucker, Jr., Cou ty Executive, County of Albemarle, this i ~ day of' , 1992. My commission expires: . A/\..aj l q I {9?3 4 . . EXHIBIT "A" SECTION 5 - POLICY REGARDING OVERSIZE HAINS (Amended 3/19/87) 5-01. OFF-SITE OVERSIZE MAINS. 1. The Service Authority may require a developer to install a water and/or sewer main larger than that required to adequately serve the developerls property. 2.' For off-site oversize mains for which the Developer has requested the Authority's participation in accordance with Section 4 of these Rules and Reaulations, the written contract between the developer and the Authority shall require that unit prices be obtained for both the size line required by the Authority and the size line adequate to serve the needs of the developer, the difference in such costs to be borne by the Authority. 3. Upon completion of the project and acceptance into the Authorityls system, the Authority shall reimburse the developer the additional cost of the oversize line. Reimbursement shall include only amounts paid to contractors for labor and materials and shall not include administrative, engineering, or legal fees. Provisions for reimbursement shall be incorporated into the off-site extension contract. 4. The developer may elect not to publicly bid an off-site 00 oversize main, in which case the Authority and the developer shall enter into a written contract agreeing that the Authority will reimburse the developer the difference in the cost of the size materials required by the Authority and the size materials necessary to adequately serve the needs of the developer, such difference in cost to be determined by the Authority based on current local material prices. Differences in material unit costs shall be specified in the contract and material quantities determined upon completlon of the construction. 5. In either case, reimbursement shall not be made until such, mains are accepted into the Authorityls system. 5-02. ON-SITE OVERSIZE MAINS. 1. The Authority may require a developer to install on-site oversize mains. In such case the developer and the Authority shall enter into a written contract agreeing to one of the following means of reimbursement: 2. For on-site oversize mains the developer and the Authority shall enter into a written contract agreeing as follows: A. The developer is solely responsible for all aspects of the construction project, which shall be performed in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements and Authority rules and regulations. B. All required federal, state and local government approvals of both the developer's building project and the utility extension project shall be obtained by the developer and delivered in writing to the Authority prior to the Authority agreeing to participatp in the project. C. The project shall be pUblicly bid. Unit prices shall be obtained for both the size line required by the Authority and the size line adequate to serve the needs of the developer, the difference in such costs to be borne by the Authority. Bid requirements and procedures shall conform with those of Chapter 4 of Title 11 of the Code of Virginia (Public Contracts in General), with the necessary changes in points of detail. The project shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Authority approval of the lowest responsible bidder shall be required prior to the award of the contract. D. Prior to the award of the contract, the owner or developer shall furnish to the Authority a certified check in the amount of the contract award, or a bond, with surety satisfactory to the Authority, in an amount sufficient for and conditioned upon the construction of the on-site facilities. E. During the construction of the project, the Authority shall approve all change orders. The Authority shall approve all project estimates prior to payment to contractors. F. Upon completion of the project and acceptance into the Authority's system, the Authority shall reimburse the developer the additional cost of the oversize line. Reimbursement shall include only amounts paid to contrac- tors for labor and materials and shall not include administrative, engineering, or legal fees. 3. The developer may elect not to publicly bid the work, in which case the Authority shall reimburse the developer the difference in the cost of the size materials required by the Authority and the cost of the size materials necessary to adequate- ly serve the needs of the developer, such difference in cost to be determined by the Authority. Differences in material unit costs shall be specified in the contract and material quantities determined upon completion of the construction. ~ 4. In either case, reimbursement shall not be made until such mains are accepted into the Authority'S system. II ~ A~ ~j~'.~ j t/19Z- JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING 2300 Commonwealth Drive, Suite B-1 Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 804-978-3644 FAX 804-978-3643 ency on Aging Serving the Citizens of Charlottesville, Albemarle, Flu vanna , Greene, Louisa and Nelson May 14, 1992 Board of Di ectors Albemarle: Edward Jones Virginia Lee John K. Plant Mark Reisler, Chair Charlottesvi Ie: Robert Bouch ran David C. Ca er Inez C. Rodg rs Mary K. Will ams Fluvanna: Ryland Walts Greene: Lee Estes Mary O. Hal en Louisa: Margaret Fra klin Audrey Johns n Nelson: Thomas R. B melt. Jf. J. Carson Het er Executive D rector: Gordon Walk r Edward H. Bain, Jr. PO Box 2616 Charlottesville VA 22901 Dear Ed, I want to share with you a timely idea that has great meri t. willingness to promote this proposal is appreciated. Your Borrowing from a successful program within Denver's Public Schools, JABA is recommending a tax credit and volunteer incentive ini tiati ve. Briefly described, property taxpayers over the age of 60, serving a minimum of 100 hours in Albemarle's schools, annually, would be granted a $250 tax credit. This rebate would be limited to 100 qualifying volunteers, annually, on a "first-corne, first-served" basis. Implementation of this program would benefit Albemarle's children, schools and elderly taxpayers. In tight economic times, it is difficult for the school budget to hire individuals on an hourly basis to aid teachers with supplemental instructional tasks. The school district's budget could, however, afford a small incentive, geared towards community members who can contribute, significantly, to the learning experience and personal development of children. It seems reasonable to pursue a system of resource exchange that would be mutually advantageous to the young and old of Albemarle. Enclosed is information outlining suggested program procedures and an estimated cost to administer. I am most willing to meet with you and others to discuss this proposal for consideration. Furthermore, please let me know if I should share this information with the Superintendent of Schools. ~4? Encl/mn Gordon Walker Executive Director Celebrating 17 Years of Community Service to the Elderly and Their Families ".'\- '- 1 : Draft JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING'S (JABA) RETIRED smIOR VOLUN'I'EER PROGRAM (RSVP) and ALBEMARLE <XXJNTY PUBLIC srnooLS Draft PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX REBATE PROORAM : The Albemarle County Public Schools (hereinafter known as "PUBLIC SCHooLS"), in cooperation with the County of Albemarle (hereinafter known as liTHE COUNTY"), is :pleased to be able to offer property tax rebate assistance for individuals who: · Are 60 of age or older · own property in THE COUNTY and reside in that property a past property tax statement ImlSt be subnitted to the Retired Senior Volunteer Program for verification purposes should applicant sell or move fran that property / RSVP ImlSt be notified within 30 days . volunteer 100 hours annually in PUBLIC SCHOOLS hours of service may begin accruing retroactive to (date to be designated) and ImlSt be ca'Ti>leted by (date to be designated) ca'Ti>leted hours ImlSt be sul:mitted to RSVP no later than (date to be designated) for application to the (date to be designated) property tax bill (due in _ - year to be designated) hours IlJJSt be verified by the school principal, program supervisor, and/ or department head at intervals teacher, regular hours vol unteered over the 100 CANNOT be carried over and applied to a rebate the following year only one rebate, in the amount of $250, may be credited annually per address. :The PUBLIC SCHOOLS can offer 100 total rebates annually. Eligible citizens will :be numerically placed on the Property Tax Rebate "active" list as they register :with the RSVP. Citizens who register after number 100 will be placed on a :waiting list until all active volunteers (number 1 - 100) have had an opportunity :to ca'Ti>lete and verify hours. If positions beccme available, waiting list :volunteer will move to the active list. Should they not have an opportunity to roove to the current list, they will have top number priority on the rebate list :for the following year. 2 The PUBLIC SCHOOLS will forward the list of 100 qualifying citizens to THE COUNTY Department of Revenue for a $250 credit towards each participant's (year to be designated) property tax bill (Due in _-year to be designated). ~ . 3 I I IDraft I I Draft PROPERTY TAX RmATE Pm Sm-f1eE CITIZSf SlmVlCE A Proposal For THE ALBEMARLE roJNTY PUBLIC saIOOLS In Cooperation With THE roJNTY OF ALBEMARLE AND THE ~IRED smIOR VOI.tJN'IlEm PROORAM 4 JEFFERSON ARE'A BOARD FOR AGING'S RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM and ALBEMARLE CXXJNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Draft Draft PROPOSED J?RC>Iltm'n TAX REBATE ~ smvla: cnfmACT As an Albenarle County Public Schools volunteer in the Property Tax Rebate Program, I affirm that I am sixty (60) years of age or older and that I own property in the County of Albemarle and reside in that property. I agree to provide a mininun of 100 hours of service in the Albemarle Public Schools between and Upon verified carpletion and subnission of these hours to the Retired Senior Vohmteer Program, I understand my name will. be forwarded to the County Department of Revenue for a property tax credit (paid for by the county Public Schools) in the amount of $250. I understand this credit will be applied to my property tax bi 11 , which is due in Name (please print) Address Telephone Signature Date A'rJ."AaI A PAST PROP!Rl'!' TAX S'l'ATJ!MeM' (for verificaticn purposes) 1(I!;1\J1Cli '1'0: Retired 5eI1ior Volunteer Program 2300 CamalWeaI th Drive, SUite B-1 Cbarlottesvi11e VA 22901 .. .". 5 'Property Tax Rebate for Senior Citizen Service lPURPOSE lMany older Americans living on fixed incanes find it difficult to keep their !hanes. Costs roomt, but their incane remains static. Recognizing that school !taxes arromt to % of the total property tax for senior citizens, the IJefferson Area Board for Aging Retired Senior Volmteer Program (RSVP) is seeking iways to help relieve the tax burden on seniors and, at the same time, enhance the leducational experience in the classroan for students. Istudents in the PUBLIC SCHOOLS are in need of roore personalized attention fran lindividuals rich with wisdan and patience. Students' study skills, carprehensive labilities, and self-esteem concepts could be greatly enriched if able and caring I lindi viduals gave time one-on-one to youth in our District. In I ight of these Ifacts, it seems reasonable to pursue a system of exchange that would rmtually lbenefit the yomg and old of our comty, e.g. tutorial instruction and support ifor students in exchange for property tax credits to senior citizens age 60 and lover. I ~ it is roost benefitting to classroan instruction to provide reinforcement of Istudy skills and concepts during the school day, the PUBLIC saIooLS must develop iincentives for daytime participation of camuni.ty II'lE!IIi:lers in education. Many lof our students are fran households where both parents work in order to provide Ithe basic necessities of the family. other students are fran single parent ~ouseholds where the demands on the parent are great, making individualized lassistance with studies difficul t. OUr schools are eager to recruit members of Ithe ccmmmi.ty who are available during school and inmediately after school to help meet the academic and erootional needs of the students. I IIn these tight econanic times, the school budget cannot well afford the hiring bf individuals on an hourly basis to aid teachers with supplemental instructional ~asks. THE <Xmf.l'Y budget could, however, afford a small incentive, geared !towards camami ty rnerrbers age 60 and over, in an area of great fiscal ~lnerability, i.e., property tax. Offering senior citizens property tax ~ebates, equaling a naxirrun of $250 for a mininun of 100 hours annual vol mteer ~ervice to PUBLIC SCHOOLS, will inpact the needs of seniors and the needs of students. Therefore, we respectfully subnit this proposal for consideration and ~gerly await authorization for inplementation. ~I<r; L All participants, or their spouses, nust be haneowners, age 60 and over, and reside within THE <Xmf.l'Y. A copy of their tax bill fran the previous year should be affixed to their initial application form to verify residency and hane ownership. If a property owner/vol mteer sells their hane during the fiscal year in which the rebate would be applied, it is the property owner/volmteer's responsibility to notify RSVP of the new property address to which the rebate should be applied; such notification must be nade no later than 6 2. Applicants will subrrdt RSVP Property Tax Rebate Applications to the RSVP Office. If approved, volunteers will attend three orientation/training meetings. At the first meeting, programs, subjects, and grade level selections will be offered. Appropriate training will then be provided in up to two additional sessions. Volunteer referrals for interview and placement will then be made to appropriate schools. Volunteer hours will begin to accrue once school. placements have been made. RSVP, working cooperatively with the schools, reserves the right to refuse applicants should they be found inappropriate or unable to perform volunteer service. 3. Volunteer placements are offered on a first-cane, first-served basis, taking skills, location in County, transportation, and physical limitations into consideration. A service contract will be signed by all participants, specifying the requirements of the program. 4. Only one property tax rebate can be issued per household per 24 month period. Once volunteer service is discontinued, eligibility and priority for property tax rebate discontinues. Continued, uninterrupted service insures priority ranking for the eligibility list. 5. All PUBLIC saIooLS service (mininun 100 hours) nust be carpleted by of the previous fiscal year in which the property tax rebate will be issued. 6. At the end of each fiscal year, a list of individuals age 60 and over who have adequately carpleted 100 hours of service to the PUBLIC SCHOOLS will be forwarded to the Office of the Treasurer, and PUBLIC SCHOOLS. 7. The Office of the Treasurer of the County PUBLIC SCHOOLS will then issue official property tax rebate vouchers (not to exceed 100 in number), for the sum of $250 to each of the 100 program participants/property owners, after full accordance of program guideline is attained. A list of such names will be forwarded to the Office of the Treasurer, Department of Revenue, in THE <XXJNTY. 8. Vouchers can then. be returned to the Department of Revenue by program participants/property owners, along with remaining property tax payment for the fiscal year. The County wi 11 accept the voucher as currency (in an amount not to exceed $250) as partial payment of the property tax bill. 9. Vouchers will be verified for eligibility against a list of eligible recipients provided by RSVP. 10. THE <XXJNTY Department of Revenue will annually establish a fiscal account fran the budget of the PUBLIC SCHOOLS. The amount of the account may vary annually, and will be determined by the School Board of PUBLIC SCHOOLS. The Property Tax Rebate program may be discontinued at any time by the School Board of PUBLIC SCHOOLS. 4llo 7 11. The Department of Revenue of the County will encumber the PUBLIC SCHOOLS' fiscal account of $25,000 for all redeemed. vouchers upon receipt of vouchers form property owners/volunteers. Unencumbered monies will remain in the account. 12. Accident and liability insurance will be covered by a policy held by RSVP and the Volunteers of America, covering all senior volunteers of PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Mileage reimburse;ment nay also be available to a limited number of volunteers through RSVP. BEM!FITS To Participants: 1. Participants have a chance to use their time to provide a service that otherwise would have been paid for by their taxes. 2. Participants will have greater control of their econanic lives in a time of escalating taxes as well as having the opportunity to share some of the knowledge they have accumulated over a lifetime with others. They also reap the satisfaction of having a significant affect on young lives. 3. Participants gain valuable training, experience, and referroals that nay assist with job acquisition in other areas. To '!HE CXXJNTY: 1. It is cost effective to substitute labor for tax monies. 2. Incentive is great in urging people to become involved with schools. 3. The program offers THE CXXJNTY residents, age 60 and over 1 a creative opportunity to manage inflexible income in the arena of ever rising costs. 4. By working side by side with educators, participants can come to better understand the needs and satisfactions of providing public education. MvISCIff (XHUTTEE ~ ccmni.ttee of senior citizens will serve in an advisory capacity to RSVP regarding the program. The Advisory Ccmni.ttee will meet as needed to review the status of the program and to prepare, with the assistance of the RSVP staff, a ~eport of program progress, strengths, and needs for the SUperintendent and School Board. 8 VOLUNTEER SENIOR CITIzm OOCEDINATCE A volunteer senior citizen coordinator will accrue 100 hours of service credit for their property tax rebate by assisting RSVP: publicizing the program internally and to PUBLIC SCHOOLS wider community surveying schools and departments to identify potential volunteer opportunities recruiting qualified seniors as program participants developing praootional materials and program forms creating a cCJ1"Puter data base and keeping it current devising an efficient paperwork system matching applicants with volunteer opportunities referring applicants to appropriate training sessions referring applicants to principals and department heads processing all paperwork conducting an evaluation of the program assisting with the Advisory Comndttee's report to the SUperintendent and School Board maintaining close communication with RSVP's Program Manager - ..,. ..- 9 BUOOET Rebate to 100 volunteers @ $250 each $25,000 Program Manager (225 days x 4 hours = 900 hrs. x $lO/hr) 9,000 750 CaTputer Input (volunteer record keeping, etc.) Volunteer Training Evaluation/Recognition 1,500 2,000 1,000 Materials TOTAL $39,250 Note: Approxinately 65% of Budget is in the fonn of rebates at a rate of $2.50/hour for time volunteered. 10 JOB DESaUPl'IOO' - PRQGIW{ ~ Recruits and screens senior citizens (age 60+) for program Assesses appropriate placement of volunteers (at hane service, classroan assistant, special tutorial program, spellbinders, etc.) Arranges training for various senior volunteer areas Schedules volunteers for training Assesses needs of schools for various senior volunteer services Arranges for contact person in each school to oversee volunteer activity Trains contact person Places and schedules volunteers in schools Arranges follow-up training as needed Conducts roonthly support groups for senior volunteers in all program areas - one support group for each program area by geographic sector - 20+ Arranges car pool transportation if needed Reports to RSVP Director Evaluates programs/services of senior volunteers Tracks hour reports fran all schools Reports qualified volunteers (after completion of 100 hours) to Treasurer for issuance of rebate certificate by of each year requests transfer of names fran Treasurer to Tax Assessor for application of rebate Verifies rebate names/addresses/tax numbers Reports to School Board on effectiveness of program Promotes program to media and other districts wp/PUBSCH/mn-S/6/92 /' . ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY MEMO T(): Jo Higgins, Engineering Departme F R () M : J . W . Brent, Executi ve Director DATE, May 21, 1992 RE: Crozet Crossing Attached please find the Crozet Crossing Agreement between Albemarle County Service Authority and the County , of Albemarle. This agreement has been approved and execut- ed by the Board of Directors. Please have the County approve this agreement and return a copy to me for our records. J.W.B JWB/lbt THIS AGREEMENT, made this Z/d day of;1j~ ,1992, by and between the Albemarle County Serv~ce Au~reafter I palled the II Authority ,II and the County of Albemarle, hereafter I called the IIDeveloperll; I WIT N ESE T H: Factual Background: (A) ~egarding oversize water and I ~ttached to this Agreement and made a part hereof as Exhibit IIAII. (B) The Developer proposes to construct a water line to serve I property on u.s. Route 240 known as Crozet Crossing, hereinafter I ~eferred to as the IIproject, II shown on a plan/profile by Roudabush, ~ale and Associates, Inc. entitled IIWater and Sewer Plan & Profile, , Phase I, Crozet Crossing at Crozetll dated September 17, 1991, with I ~atest revision December 7, 1991, hereinafter referred to as the I ~'Plans and Specifications. II (C) The Authority has required the Developer to install a ~welve (12) inch line, from an existing RWSA 1211 water line, I I traveling along Cling Lane approximately 1200' to Station 7+00, , ~arger than the eight inch line necessary to serve the Developerls , property. I I (D) From Station 7+00 to an existing 611 water line in Peach I ~ree Drive, Orchard Acres, the Authority has determined the need to I pave installed a twelve (12) inch water line to increase flows and I !fire I The Authority has adopted a policy sewer mains, a copy of which is protection in that area. : NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises I ~nd the mutual agreements hereafter set forth, the Authority and I ~he Developer do agree as follows: (1) The Authority agrees to participate in the Project in the ~anner and subject to the conditions described in this Agreement. (2) The Developer agrees to be solely responsible for all ~spects of the construction Project, which shall be performed in pompliance wi th all applicable federal, state and local I requirements, Authority rules and regulations, and the Plans and I ppecifications. I I I I (3) The Developer certifies that all required federal, state nd local government approvals of both the Developer's building roject and the Project have been obtained by the Developer and elivered in writing to the Authority. (4) The Project shall be publicly bid. for both the size line required by Unit prices shall be the Authority and the ize line adequate to serve the needs of the Developer. The uthority shall bear the difference in such cost, from the 1211 ater line in Cling Lane to Station 7+00, and shall bear all onstruction costs for that portion of line continuing from Station +00 to its point of termination at the 611 water line existing in each Tree Drive (approximately 600 feet). The nature of the rozet Crossing proj ect is such that the water line work may be 1J! warded to someone other than the low bidder as determined by the ~~. ' however, conditions outlined in paragraph ~below will j~ 'i( ~ i .,\0- During progress of the work, the members of the Authority authorized engineers and inspectors shall have access to he location of construction for the purpose of establishing to heir satisfaction that the Project is being constructed to the uthority's requirements and in accordance with the Plans and pecifications. (6) Upon completion of the Project in conformance with the uthority's requirements and the Plans and Specifications, the uthority shall reimburse the Developer for the additional cost of he oversized section of line, and shall reimburse the Developer or the total cost of the section of line extended beyond his eeds. Reimbursement shall be based on the low bid water line rices (Bid Form Item #2) determined during the public bid, and hall include only. the amounts paid to contractors for labor and aterials and shall not include administrative, engineering, or fees. Reimbursement shall be based upon final field easurement of pipe. (7) All customers served through the Project shall be shall pay all then-applicable ustomers of the Authority and 2 Authori ty rates, fees and charges, including water and sewer ponnection fees. Further, all customers served through the Proj ect ~hall be subject to all applicable Authority rules and regulations. I ~othing in this Agreement is intended to preclude the Authority , lfrom operating within constraints which are now imposed, I pr which may be imposed, by any governmental body, agency, or lauthority, without any legal liability to the Authority. I . I ( 8) The Developer agrees to name the Authority as an I ladditional insured for purposes of this agreement on its lcomprehensive general liability insurance policy for the term of lthis work for at least $1,000,000 in coverage. (9) The Developer shall guarantee all materials and ~orkmanship on the Project for a period of one (1) year from date lof final acceptance by the Authority into the Authority's utility lsystem. (10) This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the lbenefit of all parties hereto and their respective successors and I lassigns. (11) This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the Iparties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained herein. I IThere are no restrictions, promises, warranties, covenants, or lundertakings other than those expressly set forth herein. This , IAgreement supersedes all prior agreements and understandings I Ibetween the Developer and the Authority with respect to the subject I !matter hereof. This Agreement may not be amended except by a :writing executed by all parties hereto. (12) No waiver of any default by the Developer or the IAuthority with respect to this Agreement shall act as a waiver of , jany subsequent default. I 3 WITNESS the following signatures and seals: ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY By O?c~ ~ Robert R. Humphri , Chairman By Rober ISTATE OF VIRGINIA -ICITY/COUNTY OF Cl\heJY1Cd \-e...~ , The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me by Robert R. Humphris, Chairman, Albemarle County Service Authority Board of pirectors, this ;:::; \ Q- day of ('(\~ ' 1992. cAwo- 6. J\o.rYOAJ Notary Public My commission expires: , 3\.31\C1lo STATE OF VIRGINIAAJ b II ~ / COUNTY OF. -t flLtJ..A JC..-. The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me by Robert W; J~ucker, Jr., Cou ty Executive, County of Albemarle, this , ~ day of. , 1992. My commission expires: , ~ lq, (CJ?3 4 EXHIBI'l' "A" SECTION 5 - POLICY REGARDING OVERSIZE MAINS (Amended 3/19/87) 5-01. OFF-SITE OVERSIZE HAINS. 1. The Service Authority may require a developer to install a water and/or sewer main larger than that required to adequately serve the developerls property. 2.. For off-site oversize mains for which the Developer has requested the Authority's participation in accordance with Section 4 of these Rules and Reaulations, the written contract between the developer and the Authority shall require that unit prices be obtained for both the size line required by the Authority and the size line adequate to serve the needs of the developer, the difference in such costs to be borne by the Authority. 3. Upon completion of the project and acceptance into the AuthoritYls system, the Authority shall reimburse the developer the additional cost of the oversize line. Reimbursement shall include only amounts paid to contractors for labor and materials and shall not include administrative, engineering, or legal fees. Provisions for reimbursement shall be incorporated into the off-site extension contract. 4. The developer may elect not to publicly bid an off-site .' oversize main, in which case the Authority and the developer shall enter into a written contract agreeing that the Authority will reimburse the developer the difference in the cost of the size materials required by the Authority and the size materials necessary to adequately serve the needs of the developer, such difference in cost to be determined by the Authority based on current local material prices. Differences in material unit costs shall be specified in the contract and material quantities determined upon completlon of the construction. 5. In either case, reimbursement shall not be made until such. mains are accepted into the Authority's system. 5-02. ON-SITE OVERSIZE MAINS. 1. The Authority may require a developer to install on-site oversize mains. In such case the developer and the Authority shall enter into a written contract agreeing to one of the fOllowing means of reimbursement: 2. For on-site oversize mains the developer and the Authority shall enter into a written contract agreeing as follows: A. The developer is solely responsible for all aspects of the construction project, which shall be performed in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements and Authority rules and regulations. B. All required federal, state and local government approvals of both the developer's building project and the utility extension project shall be obtained by the developer and delivered in writing to the Authori ty prior to the Authority agreeing to participatp tn the project. C. The project shall be pUbliCly bid. Unit prices shall be obtained for both the size line required by the Authority and the size line adequate to serve the needs of the developer, the difference in such costs to be borne by the Authority. Bid reqUirements and procedures shall conform with those of Chapter 4 of Title 11 of the Code of Virginia (Public Contracts in General), with the necessary changes in points of detail. The project shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Authority approval of the lowest responsible bidder shall be required prior to the award of the contract. D. Prior to the award of the contract, the owner or developer shall furnish to the Authority a certified check in the amount of the contract award, or a bond, with surety satisfactory to the Authority, in an amount sufficient for and conditioned upon the construction of the on-site facilities. E. During the construction of the proj ect, the Authori ty shall approve all change orders. The Authority shall approve all project estimates prior to payment to contractors. F. Upon completion of the project and acceptance into the Authority's system, the Authority shall reimburse the developer the additional cost of the oversize line. Reimbursement shall include only amounts paid to contrac- tors for labor and materials and shall not include administrative, engineering, or legal fees. 3. The developer may elect not to publicly bid the work, in which case the Authority shall reimburse the developer the difference in the cost of the size materials reqUired by the Authority and the cost of the size materials necessary to adequate- ly serve the needs of the developer, such difference in cost to be determined by the Authority. Differences in material unit costs shall be specified in the contract and material quantities determined upon completion of the construction. , 4. In either case, reimbursement shall not be made until such mains are accepted into the Authority's system. II COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE L Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5823 May 22, 1992 ar Housing Friend, June 3, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. the Albemarle County Board of pervisors and Planning Commission will hold a special ;oint blic hearin on the Housinq Advisory Committee's report. The eting will be in Room 7 on the second floor of the Albemarle unty Office Building at 401 McIntire Road in Charlottesville. behalf of the Albemarle County Housing Advisory Committee, I vite you and all interested individuals to come to this public aring and share your experiences and views on the County's using situation and particularly on the Committee's report, "A using strategy for Albemarle County." Enclosed is the Executive mmary of the report. We encourage you to discuss with at least e of the Board members the issues raised in the report and their plications for the County and broader community by letter, lephone and/or the public hearing. the report are available upon request from Lettie Neher, e Board of Supervisors Clerk. You need to call 296-5843, and Ms. her will have a copy ready to be picked up on Friday at the Board Supervisors office on the fourth floor of the County Office ilding. T e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors appointed five c"tizens and two Planning Commissioners to the Housing Advisory C mmittee. The charge of the Committee was to address housing sues, such as cost, availability, housing condition, government gulation and its impact on the housing market, housing need oups, review of existing and potential housing assistance ograms, and the role of public in addressing these issues. Albemarle is going to achieve safe, sanitary and affordable using for all County residents while protecting its natural, s enic, historic, economic and human resources in the next twenty ars, what steps do you think should be taken? this announcement with other interested individuals Thank you. ;;(:::y~: ~ Karen V. Lilleleht, Chair Albemarle County Housing Advisory Committee nclosure -:;./ /' ;.~" ':-;..'t' c:"./' AHIP Albemarle Housing Improvement Program ,:/':!/5-L / 409C East High Street. Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 . (804) .293-5708 ,',; . . ;'~!iN 2 ,tin j! \ Ii \ / 1 i l I\\~ r:~~;'(5~~~5L'.:~;.! lr 'ToTC:: ~:J C~ ib, ~:< L; C:j F ~) t) ~. ' R \j ! June 1, 1992 ~r. David Bowerman, Chairman ~lbemarle County Board of Supervisors ~01 McIntire Rd. I ~harlottesville, Virginia 22901 I bear Mr. Bowerman, , , , On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Albemarle Housing ~mprovement Program, Inc., I'd like to commend the Albemarle ~ounty Housing Advisory Committee on their excellent Housing Strategy Report. We fully support the recommendationsJf the Fommittee and stand ready to assist the County in the ~mplementation of the proposed strategies. I , As an agency intimately involved with housing activities in ~lbemarle County we can attest to the accuracy of the trends ~ited in the Housing Report. AHIP's main emphasis over the years I lhas been the rehabilitation of substandard housing for homeowners. Recently we have become involved in the provision of laffordable homeownership opportunities for low and moderate :i n com e f ami 1 i est h r 0 ugh the C r 0 z e t C r 0 s sin g pro g ram. A HIP and ~lbemarle County should both take pride in this accomplishment. iH 0 w eve r , be c a use we are e x p 0 sed tot hem u I tit u d e 0 f rem a i n i n g :h 0 u sin g pro b I ems in the Co u n t y, we, and you, m u s t pre s s tom e e t it h e h 0 us in g nee d s 0 f the man y fa mil i e s not be in g s e r v e d by :existing programs. It is apparent that more needs to be done to lprovide affordable housing opportunities, both rental and lownership, for Albemarle County's lowest income families. I , Through expanded support of AHIP and its ac tivi ties, and ,the adoption of the Housing Advisory Committee's recommendations, :Albemarle County can take great strides in assuring that all lcitizens in Albemarle County have safe, decent, and affordable lshel ter. I Doug Frame President-AHIP Board of Directors An Affiliate of The Charlottesville Housing Foundation '-. . /:.---- l' /,/'-,///~../ /' -" / --1 / //(_ f ./'-.{ ..J Lea ue of Women Voters of Charlottesville and Albemarle County 413 East Market Street, Room 203. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Phone: (804) 972-1795 June 3, 1992 [fo: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors I I I From: League of Women Voters of Charlottesville, and Albemarle County I , ~e: Public Hearing on Housing Committee Report , The League of Women Voters of Charlottesville and Albemarle County has long s4Pported the development of policies and 'programs to make adequate housing available and affordable for this area's residents. We monitored the Housing Advisory Committee's work ~d belief that its final report and recommendations reflect thoughtful analysis and pragmatism in dealing with a serious situation. We commend its effort and urge the Board of S~pervisors to review its findings earnestly, adopt its recommended goal, and implement p~licies to achieve the objectives. ! The Housing Committee recommends that the County set a goal of "achiev[ing] safe, s~itary and affordable housing for all county residents while protecting natural, scenic, h.storic, economic and human resources. II This goal reflects a balancing of important I i*erests for this community. The availability of affordable housing for people working here, p~ticularly those employed by the County, is basic to a viable, balanced community. The nted to eliminate sub-standard housing, which does not conform to building code standards, c4n hardly be disputed. The exposure of residents of such housing to recognized and avoidable health and safety risks is unacceptable. : However, as the Committee acknowledges, safe and affordable housing can and should I b~ provided without forsaking the protection of other resources. There are many residents, i~cluding members of the League, as well as county planning and governing officials who h~ve labored for the preservation of open space, environmental cleanliness and beauty and o~her aspects of a suitable living environment. : The Committee further recommends that the housing strategy report be adopted as part of the County's Comprehensive Plan. Such incorporation will signify an important cqmmitment by the County to achieving the goal of adequate and affordable housing. By a~opting a specific long-term time frame, such as the twenty years suggested by the Cpmmittee, the County will set the stage for realistic planning with ample time for i~plementation. ! The report delineates eight recommendations with numerous strategies for realizing the oljljectives. Although the League cannot address all of the recommendations and strategies at I tij.s hearing, we want to address four significant aspects of the approach the Committee recommends. , A~~ : First, the County is called upon to be the l~~~ but only one of the actors, in i~plementing most recommended strategies. The government is not expected to be the b~ilder of housing projects or even the financial ~ponsor of most housing development. R~ther, it is to be the promoter, organizer, coordinator and reinforcer of a public-private I "...a non:pa1'&an ~Baniza'''m diu,,,,a'''' to 'M yyomotwn of 'nformea and" aa'V. yayticipati<m of a'iz,"" in B''''',""""nL " ..... . ,. . e~fort involving an array of non-profit and citizensl organizations, landowners, contractors, bcfkers, developers, realtors and interested citizens. This cooperative approach makes eqonomic and practical sense in this time of limited available public funds. Moreover, i~volvement and investment by members of the community increases the likelihood of s*cessfuI and widely accepted action. : Second, the report recommends the establishment of citizen committees to develop sRecific means for increasing the supply of assisted rental housing an~for assisting in fi~ancing affordable housing. While the League would not want thepssues to be studied w'thout end, such citizen participation will mean that interested commun~~ will be i volved and have a stake in the successful implementation of policies. !lreQ'.'@f, t e i volvement of business people and the University in devising ways for them to assist e~ployees in finding housing in the county should mean the development of practical a~proaches to solving the problem. : Third, a significant aspect of the Committee's proposal deals with the establishment of h~using counseling and education. The League supports making such information available. lIicreased citizen access to information about solutions to t~~ir housing problems would ~ e~power citizens to take greater responsibility for solvingfJiousing problems. ! Fourth, the Committee recommends coordination of the Countyls activities with those ~adjaCent jurisdictions through the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. The gue agrees that coordination is vital to the ultimate solution of the region I s housing p oblems. 1 The League recognizes that the County's role in finding solutions to the housing p~oblems in this community has been heightened by the absence of ~federal and state programs and funding. We encourage the County to seek whatever federal and state support isl available and actively pursue improved federal and state assistance to provide adequate h<l>using for the residents of Albemarle County. I Again, we commend the Housing Advisory Committee for its report and urge you to ta(ke the leadership it recommends to improve the availability and affordability of safe and 9nitary housing for county residents. STATEMENT TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS at the Public Hearing on the Report of the Housing Advisory Committee June 3, 1 992 Through all of our growth, development and prosperity one segment of our population has been consis~tently left out: our I inpigenous poor and lowest income workers and their families. Co~peting with thousands of University students seeking rental I horsing and priced out of the market by well-to-do newcomers se~king our preferential taxes and beautiful scener~ as well as byl Albemarlels careful land us€regulations}these families' housing , si~uations have continued to deteriorate. I , The need for low income, assisted rental housing is our most cr~tical one. It is not healthy for children to grow up in gross- I ly! overcrowded and degraded housing without access to proper sani- ta~ion. Their ability to learn is impaired, their self-esteem I permanently blighted through no fault of their own. We caqpt provide workers for needed services in our community if: we continue to foreclose these families from safe, warm, dry , hopsing, education and an honorable place in our midst. . I :.1).. 't?~ ""~ -Jt..: ~ ~ 1LJ> JJ A~--e ~J J!~1 J R~I(~ ~r Rellen Perry Member ALBEMARLE HOUSING COALITION . 1; /'/)0 _ . ~_ /) ...- dJ~ ev~,~ hc..~sl k ,+!A.K ut.-fU-u~4/J,.tR Ltlk.-vrlt..,L m 7 .' ... . 4~~ a- ~~ <de ~~ ~~#_ tu<.i<~ f~ d (. t, koJ- J./; (); - ~7_ :--11., 7,JPDe 0 /~r i~ f~' . jJ At rr~ U(/~pl,' -- ~ ~J ~, 2~' .. t;;:;^' /- ~ ~..i2t e.-Z; - Ck-V eA'"J-.~ w c;eJ~...J'-<..- Tl i ----J 7J 'T ~ 7u {' ~ : elt ~ -f-n.. ~(J7' tr< ~ I l) e c~.~f - ~y~ ~ # ~ - .. ,')5' -. , .:/ . PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ::/~/>- ? / Protecting The Environment Is Everybody's Business e Honorable Charlotte Y. Humphris bemarle County Board of Supervisors 1 McIntire Road arlottesville, VA 22903 The Piedmont Environmental Council supports the findings of the bemarle County Housing Advisory 'Committee in its II A Housing Strategy for lbemarle County." PEC believes that these findings, and the recommendations ased upon them, provide guidance for taking proper steps to increase the amount affordable housing in the County, the lack of which we recognize is an important roblem. PEC considers that the provision of affordable housing in our growing e onomy is fully compatible with our Comprehensive Plan and the meaningful c nservation of rural land. We applaud the Committee for resisting the temptation t recommend that the solution to housing needs is to throw out land use r gulations and abandon the County's long standing conservation policies. Such a r dical strategy is not only unnecessary but, in the long run, it would harm most ose who are least able to insulate themselves economically. Good planning and affordable housing strategy must go hand-in-hand, to the benefit of all our tizens. A critical ingredient in achieving these goals is adequate information. Not y does this mean more information about who needs what type of housing, but o more information concerning the factors that have resulted in such housing ot being provided by the private sector. Popular answers tothese questions-are based on unrealistic assumptions and are sometimes driven by the hidden endas of various interest groups. Because effective solutions must be based upon curate and up-to-date information, PEC urges you to expand upon the good work the Housing Advisory Committee by establishing a monitoring program that ould regularly evaluate the housing needs of Albemarle citizens and determine e type and location of housing available to meet those needs. 28-C Main Street, Box 460, Warrenton, Virginia 22186/703-347-2334/Fax 349-9003 1010 Harris Street, Suite 1, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901/804-977-2033 I . . e Honorable Olarlotte Y. Humphris J e 2, 1992 age 2 This monitoring program should be the job of a full-time housing oordinator (a recommendation of the Committee) working with the Planning Staff using information from Inspections, the Health Department, the Education partment, as well as non-profit housing organizations and local employers. Until a full-time housing coordinator is in place, the problems of affordable housing never be addressed with the necessary depth of information, consistency, and rsistence . PEC believes that Albemarle County is particularly fortunate in possessing, . thin its private sector excellent housing providers, both profit and non-profit. We ve a diversified and active home building industry and a number of experienced on-profit institutions, such as the Otarlottesville Housing Foundation, the Jordan velopment Corporation, AHIP and others. According1~ we think that an portant task of the housing coordinator should be to work on a continuing basis 'th such organizations to develop, in light of current information, ecommendations for specific .public-private" partnerships that would improve the ousing supply for low income citizens. Among other things the provision of . services to low income homeowners and tenants would, where appropriate, contemplated. PEC suggests that such a coordinator be a joint employee of the County and TJPDC. This would not only reduce the County's own costs, but more portantly, it would reflect the fact that housing is a regional problem. A model for a joint effort could be the Albemarle ITJPDC legislative liaison with the eral Assembly. We also offer further, more specific suggestions: An important need in meeting our housing and planning goals is to reserve served by public utilities for the development of affordable housing. Virginia de section 15.1-446.17 provides that comprehensive plans may designate areas for implementation of measures to promote the construction and maintenance of ordable housing. Section 15.1-489 (10) of the Code provides that zoning dinances may be designed to achieve, among other things, the promotion of ordable housing. Taken together, these two recent additions to the Virginia Code ar to offer a major opportunity to reserve land served by utilities for the rovision of affordable housing. Such reservations offer further opportunity to Ip relieve the pressure of scattered site housing development on our rural areas. , j , ~ Honorable Charlotte Y. Humphris e 2, 1992 age 3 I I I I For example, the County might front end the cost of extending utilities into urban area included by amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. Such land ould be designated in the Plan as an II affordable housing area. II The land within . area would retain its Rural Area designation until a developer were to request zoning to a higher density and proffer the provision of enough affordable housing o meet the Comprehensive Plan goal established for that area. Because this land old be specifically identified in the Plan for affordable housing and because the unty would extend utilities expressly for this purpose, an affordable housing offer would be an appropriate way for a developer to insure that the impact of his evelopment was consistent with County policy. Such an approach would protect County's investment in utilities, encourage more effective IIpublic-private rships" for the provision of affordable housing, and promote the scattered site liey within the growth areas which the County favors. One specific recommendation about which we have a concern is the commendation for accessory apartments in Rural Areas. As long as such partments utilize existing development rights, we have no objection. However, if ese accessory dwelling units are to be in excess of development rights already xisting under current RA zoning development rights, such accessory apartments ould greatly increase residential density allowed in the Rural Area This we ould vigorously oppose. I r:1 Subject to the foregoing suggestions, PEe urges you to accept ,. A Housing ategy for Albemarle County. and to initiate steps to support the achievement of ts goals. Sincerely, ~~ U~ .. .__ Reuben Qark, Olairman Albemarle County Board of Directors . -,< . "7-, . / / ? ,/.dI 11/-'> '~L:.?-rC~2'7 C'?---:;:; -'i /f /< ~~ "'----- . Committee ,.. I Citizens for Albemarle statement on the Refort of the Albemarle County Housing Advisory : at the I i Joint Public Hearing of the Planning Commission i and the Board of Supervisors I June 3, 1992 I I I am Jack Marshall, speaking to you as President of Citizens for ~lbemarle. We commend the Housing Advisory Committee for examinIng I apd making sense of a huge amount of data, and for producing a! thoughtful and balanced report. I I qitizens for Albemarle strongly endorses the main r~commendations of this report, and -- with some qualifications I 11 note in a minute -- we support nearly all the specific s rategies. Our organization is divided on the issue of mobile hpmes, and on the strategies for dealing with them. , I I I I4et's quickly go through our main thoughts on the report. I I I lthe comprehensive plan should, as proposed in Recommendation ~' deal with the need for decent and affordable housing.. A s aff housing coordinator and a citizens' committee should ensure t at the issue is treated with the attention it deserves. I I I ~trategy B-8, urging that accessory apartments be allowed in all zoning districts, makes good sense. But if the potential for aFcessory apartments were realized -- even partly -- the Bopulation in rural areas could be significantly higher than even t~e Citizens for Albemarle build-out map envisions. Some ~echanism needs to be introduced to deal with this consequence. I I I I I I I I I I ... . J'''' . ~ecommendation D -- to implement the growth management plan - I is of course dear to the heart of our organization. We a plaud the introductory section (page 15) emphasizing the i terdependence of natural resources and housing. But we're not c ear about the meaning of the second sentence in the second p ragraph1, nor 2e is the intent of Strategy D-l apparent. Does i mean that the growth areas should be expanded? I I ~ecommendation E -- to increase the supply of rental housing - - I is important, and the wording of Strategy E-l needs to be . proved. We particularly support the statement in this strategy t at "the assisted rental housing should be build within d signated growth areas", but suggest the report may also wish t address the problems of transportation into Charlottesville f om growth areas in all magisterial districts. I , lthe costs of implementing some of the proposed strategies are a mittedly hard to anticipate, but the report too often -- e pecially when dealing with the most expensive activities -- begs t e question by stating "costs to be determined". Taxpayers n ed to have a realistic estimate of what these suggestions will c st. I I I ~ut taxpayers also should recognize -- as most do -- that the p ovision of decent affordable housing is a minimum requirement . a. ~air ~nd equitable society, and thal!t is an u~~ ofit'ring In Cl . ,j .1 -! J /J /J_ it--<-. ~tx- ~;3 c/.--e- h /' (vc 10< >~c~. .~-q- 06 rave ad2abli:gat.iPD::to o.~ ,,0 ~ r",_ Yo~ " We thank the Committee for defining a serious problem in our ntidst, and suggesting how we might solve it. Wedlop"( YVtr~ I I -1 I l"A contributing factor is that marl) county residents can afford to buy the large tr cts of land required by the zoning ordinance to build homes in the rural a.reas". ., ... MONTICELLO AREA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY 215 East High Street Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 (804) 295-3171 , HEAb START NEL$ON COUNTY CHILD CARE CENTER PARlENTS IN EDUCATION PRO~ECT DISCOVERY DREWARY J. BROWN JOB TRAINING CENTER COM\MUNITY PROGRAMS CHIljD HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS HENl~.Y B. MITCHELL HOPE HOUSE , June 3, 1992 Mr. pavid Bowerman, Chairman Albe~arle County Board of supervisors Albe~arle County Office Building Cha~lottesville, Virginia 22901 I Dea~ Mr. Bowerman: I a~ writing to indicate my strong support for the recommendations of the IAlbemarle county Housing Advisory Committee. The need to increase aff~rdable housing opportunities in Albemarle is evidenced by the fact thay many individuals are now paying an excessive amount of their incqme to rent units in the County. According to the 1990 U.S. cen~us, there were 2,064 Albemarle residents paying 35 percent or more of ~heir household income towards rent. This represents 26.4 percent, or more than one out of every four, renters in the County. Addi- tio~ally, the current housing stock requires continued rehabilitation effqrts, as 501 units lacked complete plumbing. The igrowing problems related to poverty in Albemarle county are fur~her indicated by the vast increase in requests for housing ass is- tande (which doubled between 1988 and 1991) along with the greater num~er of applications for food stamps (up 57 percent from 1989- 91/~rom 655 to 1,031). Unemployment is also on the rise, with close to ],000 county residents joining the ranks of the unemployed between Jul~, 1990 (682 unemployed) and March, 1992 (1,612 unemployed). The emp~oyment rate almost doubled during this period (from 2.4 to 4.6 perdent) . MAC~'s program annually serve over 250 Albemarle families who often musti choose to use their limited incomes either for housing or to meet ano~her essential need. Some of these families even today are con- sid~ring building an outhouse as the only alternative to improving the~r living conditions since they cannot otherwise secure a decent affqrdable home. Breaking the Cycle of Poveny . " }. Mr. Oavid Bowerman Junei 3, 1992 Page! 2 Thes~ situations do not belong in Albemarle County, and the strategies outl'ned by the Housing Advisory Committee offer workable remedies. On a related note, I urge the County to initiate a similar process to addr~ss the need for viable jobs for all County residents. I I Thanf you for your leadership. Sincerely, l~~ Kenneth Ackerman Executive Director KA/gp I I / ,-/ ~ Thomas Jefferson Housing Improvement Corporation 413 East Market Street, Suite 102 Charlottesville, Va. 22901 (804)972-1720 June 3, 1992 Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Albemarle County Planning Commission Dear Board and Commission Members: The Thomas Jefferson Housing Improvement Corporation enthusiastically supports the Report of the Albemarle County Housing Advisory Committee and urges its adoption by Albemarle County. The Committee report supports the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan and addressees housing related issues in a harmonious manner respective to the plan. It appears the Committee recommendations are attainable. They should be adopted by each and every entity in Albemarle County associated with housing until they are achieved to the level possible in our era of human sophistication. Sincerely, ~1~-!tfrr-1 President Thomas Jefferson Housing Improvement Corporation _..._.~~.. _._~'":::'.;~--::::'~ -=.---:':'~-~-_.._._---... -.. ,_. .T P.O. Box 5082 Charlottesville, VA 22905 C h a rl otte SV ill e NOW NATl NAL I 1'011I M_N Statement Presented by Charlottesville N.O.W. at the Public Hearing on the Albemarle County Housing on Wednesday, June 3, 1992 I am ~()Y"\'O ~ , representing the Charlottesville r gional chapter of the National Organization fQr Women. e have read the document titled A Housing Strategy for Albemarle on. We are d~eply concerned about issues raised in this document. Ibemarle County, is ,- poor; that can not be denied. Albemarle County is rowing; that can not be denied either. Albemarle County is becoming an i creasingly difficult place for poor and average income people to live; t eir relative numbers are decreasing. To maintain the quality of life for II of us in this community and better yet, to strive to protect and improve i , then the needs must be recognized, hardships dealt with and plans made f r our future. e are concerned for the individuals and families in Albemarle County r ght now. Those in poverty in Albemarle are disportionately women and hildren. Near to half of the female headed households with young hildren are below poverty levels in Albemarle County. The housing they eed is not available. The waiting lists are closed when the lists become I nger than the housing projected to become available. This is common. Ibemarle needs to adequately take care of its less well off members. We s rongly urge you to expand the rent assisted units, accessory apartments, nd employer assisted housing available through any and all sources and to explore the possibilities of a housing authority. Housing is essential for each individual. Albemarle needs to do its fair share. e are pleased that you have funded Albemarle Housing Improvement rogram over the years to repair homeowners' homes. These programs are e pecially important for improving the quality of life for many elderly p or women who cannot afford to make those repairs. We hope you will e pand that noble effort to more units, including rental units and by c eating an emergency repairs fund. No one in this county, owner or r nter, should have to be in wet, cold or dangerous shelters. I I T ere is an affordability crisis. Because the average income resident is h ving great difficulty, we take notice, but it is worse for the low income . .1 ,,~. :- ivL-- L _/ , .. .J. . residents. We agree that the growth areas need to be expanded, infrastructure provided, land bank and tr~st started, funding and education available. You need to have a strong and complete housing program with the clout of the Comprehensive Plan. All housing should be dealt with equally: mobile homes should not have more costs and restrictions than single family homes. These people can least afford it and it is not fair. We are concerned the Board will not act on housing proposals which will"light the darkest corners first"-ie, benefitting the neediest first. The poor have the weakest political voice; they are without resources, often without hope and dealing with serious basic problems that you or I are not. That is where you can make the greatest impact. We feel that the evaluation committee in providing oversight of the increasing costs of housing, the availability of the housing in general and in particular, housing for the low-income, as well as planning for the housing impact of increasing numbers of residents in this County is essential to preventing problems from esculating and becoming unmanageable in the future. We urge you establish the evaluation committee immediately. We submit these recommendations in the belief that we can achieve the ultimate goals of equitable policy making for the benefit of all of the County. We hope that you will carefully consider our recommendati,ons, and we thank you for your time. Name: ~ JC~~ Telephone: 71~-~9D i -~ / _5-1 /.:" ':;{..",d, Y 7/7-~ . -+ . JUNE 2,1992 "1 r , I ; :; " THE 1NSWER FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INDEPENDENT HOUSINg ;'l~i~P81:!...~ I . '...,,,,~ '" .~.,.~,' .,;. HOMEICOURTS,VILLAGES,ETC. WHERE THE INDIVIDUAL OWNS l1HEi,ll-OWN I HOME I AND RENTS THE SPACE. COMMUNITY RULES AND REGULATIONS WOULD HELPiTO PREVENT THE NIGHTMARES THAT PEOPLE ASSOCIATE WITH THESE HOME. A TREE BARRIER OF 50lTO 1001 WITH ONE ROW OF EVERGREENS COUL PREVENT ADJACENT LANDOWNERS LOSS OF PROPERTY VALUE. [PERHAPS THES~ COMMITTEES, BOARDS SHOULD CONSIDER A 501 SIDE AND BACK LINE SET BACK FOR ALL STRUCTURES UNLESS THERE IS AN EVERGREEN BARRIER ON THE BUILDERS LAND. THIS WOULD SERVE TO MAINTAIN THE RURAL QUALITY OF THE COUNty AND MAINTAIN A STANDARD THAT COULD NOT HAVE EXCEPTIONS FOR THE OIVERWORKED STAFF WHEN PEOPLE TO NOT ADHERE TO BUILDING PERMITS.] THE ChUNTY STATES THAT IT IS CONCERNED WITH THE LACK OF AFFORDABLE HOUSI~G IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY ,BUT HAS REPEATED TURNED AWAY FROM THIS AS A IRESOLUTION. MANY OF THE REQUIREMENTS BY ZONING,PLANNING , AND P~IVATE ATTITUDE HAVE ALL BUT ELIMINATED PRIVITIZATlON. THE SUBDI ISION SETTING REQUIRED TO MAKE A MOBILE HOME COURT A REALITY. FURTHER REQUIREfUBLlC WATER AND SEWER. I IF A BUDGET IS DONE FOR THE MEDIAN FAMILY- THE MONEY NECESSARY TO DRIVE THE EXTRA DISTANCE, GET THE CHILD OUT OF DAY CARE/AFTERSCHOOL AND A LOWS FOR THE SMALL SET BACKS IN LIFE AND HOUSE REPAIRS,- PROXI ITY BECOMES EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. THE AMERICAN DREAM IS TO OWN A HOM . FOR MANY THIS INCLUDES A SMALL PIECE OF LAND. FOR ALL THE D EAM IS INDEPENDENCE. A MOBILE HOME VILLAGE COULD PROVIDE PROXI"1ITY. FOR MANY THIS IS A REALlTY(old, ill, night job,single parent, workin~ parent). FOR THE YOUNG STARTING OUT THIS SETTING WOULD BE A FINA~CIAL START - NOT A RENTAL LOSS. [OFTEN AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS/ I HOUSE~ ARE NOT SAFE AND ARE CLUSTERED TOGETHER AFFORDING NO MARGIN FOR SP~CE-SAFETY]. THE PARK COULD BE LIMITED TO SINGLE WIDES AND HAVE OPTIONS FOR LOT SIZE. HE DEVELOPMENT COULD BE DONE IN SETS OF 50 TO ALLOW FOR GROWT~ AND CHANGE WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRAI LE~ INDUSTRY (15-20 years to allow for upgrade and obsolete standards). I 1O.,~ t ;? . .~ .' '/ ...2. Your AQency on Aging Serving the Citizens of Charlottesville, Albemarle, I I I I I Board of Ditectors I I Albemarle: : Edward Jone,: Virginia Lee: John K. P1antr Mark Reisleu Chair , , Charlottesville: Robert Bouchtron David C. Ca1er Inez C. ROdgrrs Mary K. Will ams Fluvanna: Ryland Watts Greene: Lee Estes I Mary 0 Holqen I Louisa: : Margaret Fra~klin Audrey Johns~n I Nelson: I Thomas R. BJrnett. Jr. J. Carson Hetler I Executive Director: Gordon Walk~r JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING 2300 Commonwealth Drive, Suite B-1 Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 804-978- 3644 FAX 804-978-3643 '\ ~t ~ Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa and Nelson JUIW 2, 1992 David Bowerman, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Albemarle County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville VA 22902-4596 Dear Mr. Bowerman and Members of the Board, First and foremost, I commend the Albemarle County Housing Advisory Committee for an outstanding production. The Housing Strategy report is very thorough and convincing. The Committee and the,ir staff have performed a great community service. I would like to recommend a few items I believe they are consonant with the Committee's charge and recommendations. for inclusion in the report. spiri t and intent of the 1. Pursue the active participation of local banks to make reverse annuity mortgages (RAM) available to qualifying homeowners. Oftentimes, the equity in an older person's home is such that money can be made available for home repairs, payment of medical bills and other necessities. Relatively easy access to home equity via RAM's can enable a single person or couple to remain in their own homes. To my knowledge, no local banks currently offer this program. 2. Establish a rent relief program for low income renters. This is permissible under Virginia statute and is practiced in Charlottesville and other jurisdictions where rent payments are high and rental payments are a large percent of a person's/family's income. Celebrating 17 Years of Community Service to the Elderly and Their Families ~ " Mr. David Bowerman - 2 - June 2, 1992 3. Increase the supply of adaptable housing so the frail and disabled are provided with viable housing options. Frequently, the disabled and retirees end up in housing not suitable to their current or future needs for accessibility, mobility and safety. The County's housing and real estate industry will depend more and morl~ on the retiree population for construction and sales, witness a 40% increase during the 1980's in the 65 and over population (a trend that will continue). There is an insufficient supply of adaptable housing available now and plans to produce more are not in progress. The prospective older homeowner requires housing that can be adapted to their changing needs. One small accident or illness can leave them a "prisoner" within their own home or "homeless," if their home cannot be modified or was not well designed in the first place to meet changing physical conditions. The report's recommendation for increased low income rental housing is of critical importance, and one which we wholly support. I want to thank the Committee for this opportunity to comnent and for a job well done. OJ?! Gordon Walker Executive Director rnn JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING .. ~ ~. ccc;r--e:~/ 6';::3-j/'..?? ....-:-:. 6~/ . . . ~ . INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNIlY ECONOMICS, INC. 57 School Street Spnngfield, MA 01105-1331 (413) 746-8660 Fax: (413) 746-8862 May 4, 1992 Del\ir friends, I The economic and social health of a community, rural or ur~an, depends a great deal on who owns and controls the land and how that land is used. Five hundred years ago, when Columbus artived, the land on this continent was considererl a precious ,re$ource -- like the water and the air -- available to all who ne4ded it. Today land is treated as a commodity, sold to the hithest individual or corporate bidder, often in large quantities. Th$ land ownership patterns that result often deny many people ac~ess to land. : The Institute for Community Economics helps community-based grcDups organize for community control of land and development. Welwork wi~h these gro~ps, like the ones described below, to form co~munity lanri ~rusts that develop and preserve affordable housing and provide access to land for low-income familes excluded by the matket. We need your assistance. Please make ~ financial co tribution so that ICE can respond to the growing number of re uests or technical assistance, training and financing. : Today, the struggle for ownership and control of the land ta~es many forms. In rural areas these struggles often place land di~ectly in the forefront: I I : * In northern ~1innesota, Native Americans have organized the Wh~te Earth Land Recovery Project to regain control of lost re~ervation lands. : * The Wisconsin Farmland Conservancy was organized by fa1mers from Wisconsin to help put families back on the land and to I fos ter sus t ainab Ie agricul ture . I I : * The Addison County Community Trust, in Middlebury, Ve~mont, acquires mobile home park land to preserve its use by mooile home park residents and purchases development rights to la1d in the county to preserve open space and farmland. I . In cities, the E~ruggle often takes a different form, not easiily recognized as a .Light over land. But the battle over the l~~, of affo:dable housing, over who will live in and shape the II e at ~ nelghborhood, is also ~ battle over who owns and co~trols the land on which we live and work. . .f" .. "Take a stand. Own the land.1I This call to action comes from the Dudley Street Neighborhood I,itiative (DSNI), based in inner-city Boston. DSNI has u~dertaken the enormous task of taking back ownership of, then d~veloping, t~e V3St stretches of vacant land in this disinvested n~ighborhood that is home to 14,000 people. The land that DSNI a~quires -- through emminent domain powers granted by the City as w~ll as through more conventional means -- will be placed into a community land trust. The community land trust will assure that t~e people in the community will always have a say as to how the l~nd is used. And the land trust will assure that housing d~veloped on that land will be permanently affordable for future I . getnerat1.ons. * * * In cities, "neighborhood" is often the word we use to d~scribe the land we occupy as a community, and the creation of d~cent, affordable housing is often the most important goal for its use. Yet land is much more than the ground that supports the buildings on it -- land is the foundation of our community. Any sqruggle over land -- any effort to rebuild a neighborhood __ inevitably leads beyond the development of affordable housing. This is certainly true in Cabbagetown, a neighborhood in Atlanta w~ich faces substantial ?entrification pressures because of its p~oximity to downt0w~, as well as some of the social problems t~pical to so many low-income communities. I Cabbagetown Revitalization and Future Trust (CRAFT) is a cdmrnunity land trust, a member of ICE's CLT Affiliate Program a~d a borrower from IC~'s Revolving Loan Fund, which works to p~ovide affordable homeownership opportunities to residents of tHe historic Cabbagetown neighborhood. I I I As the enclosed article describes, C~~FT has already cdmpleted 18 units of housing and is working on more. Yet CRAFT i~ an imP0rtant example of why a community land trnst must be a cqmmunity advocate as well as a competent developer of affordable hdusing. I Like many neighborhoods Cabbagetown is experiencing increased drug dealing and violence. Yet, unlike most housing d~velopers, who build and leave, CRAFT has a real stake in the f~ture of the neighborhood and confronts these problems. Reicent ly, CRAFT organized several meet ings of res ident s to d~scuss an appropriate response to increased drug dealing in the n~ighborhood. Through intimidation, the drug dealers tried to n~p this organizing effort in the bud. During my recent trip to A~lanta Peggy Williams, :RArr's Executiv~ Director, told me that j~st the night before two l~;~d trust houses were riddled with m~chine gun fire (fortunately no one was hurt). The next day a s~x-year-old child1s pet rabbit was killed and left as a warning to anyone who wanted to fight for a safe neighborhood. 2 f The following day, representatives of CRAFT confronted the m~yor and police department officials at a public meeting. They d~manded that the City respond to the violence in the n~ighborhood. The residents got a respons2 -- the police have b~come visible and active in the neighborhood and perpetrators have been arrested. CRAFT's successful action demonstrates that i~ we want real change for our communities and not just a few uqits of housing, we need strong community organizations that eqpower residents. That same week CRAFT also used its organizing strength to g~t the City of Atlanta to finally release the Community D~velopment Block Grant money that had been committed over a year aqd a half ago. ICE has two loans to CRAFT -- for projects that have needed the City's CDBG funds to do the rehab. Thanks to C~FT's persistence ICE will soon be repaid, and CRAFT will have d~veloped more units of housing and placed more land in permanent tnust for its neighborhood. I I , I The residents of Cabbagetown are taking a stand. Through CRAFT they are fighting for their neighborhood. They are aqquiring land to create affordable housing for themselves and fqr their children. And they are working hard to assure that the hdusing they create and the land they place in trust will be at t~e heart of a safe and stable community. I I I ICE is working with dozens of groups around the country l~ke CRAFT and like the others described in this letter. Many of t ese groups operate on shoestring budgets. They often barely h ve funds to pay staff. Your financial support allows us tQ ovide technical assistance and training to these community- se groups. I : 1992 will pass. But the stuggle for the land, for control and ownership of our neighborhoods and communities, will continue. We are working hard to build a network of democratic, community- b4sed organizations -- community land trusts -- that are vibrant aqd forceful in their commitment to respond to today's needs and pneserve opportunities for future generations. Your partnership iq this effort is critical to its success. Yours sincerely, 7 / /' '.. ~ ,/' ~-t' ( '':I / Greg Ramm Executive / , , " '(( J." u t Director P.~c Ynu can he~p communities re~ain contol of their land and ~ I1~e~ Gi ts received in t e coming weeks will help pay ~members of CRAFT ~nd other community land trusts to attend tqe Second Annual Meeting of Community Land Trust Affiliates. P~ease give generously. 3 Ioumnl 0 THE ATLANTA CONSTITUTION October 27, , SUNDAY.HOMEFlNDER. 'T es ownership dream e in Cabbagetown Homeownershi main an elusive moderate-income f live intown. A group of resid nts in historic Cab- bagetown is help' to make those dreams come true. Calling themselves the Cabbage- town Revital. Ization and Future Trust. .\. _ _..._ __.c::... _..... I..U-:: uvl.l.......VU~ w~'- hood residents in homes and LS wo S55.000 to 570.000 vr=:.2~ t;y =~ig~tN,. 1988 has built 18 g on six more in the rice range. The trust was b rn at a critical time when the landmark dlstrict of 450 work. lng-class homes w s gaming popularity for its intown loca on and reasonably priced propertles. 'ard and off-s parking. Priced in he low to mid-S4Q ,Mr. White's designs .ave 832 square f t on the mam level in d an unfinished attic that can be ex. )anded into a be room and bath And ~'Ith a few extra energy-efficlent fea. 'ures. Mr 'i\lllte p edJcts the new OWD- 'rs will find uulJ . costs as reasonable ,s their mOr1{:age 'we build wun a southern exposure lD most WlDdows. an insulated founda. -Jon or crawl sp ce and double-pane ~'1ndows," Mr \\ te said "WIth a high nsulanon packag - R.30 In the ceiJ. ngs. R-19 In the w s - a peak gas bill or heating. coo and hot water ;hould be under 0 a month" Ms Williams said most of the =RAIT houses se to tradll:lOnal Cabba. !etown familIes: 'orlung-dass people )f moderate mean whose parents gre-.. ~p In the area The trust sells properues 31 cost Mos1 horn s appratse for more .han that amount. so to keep monthly ;Jayments afforda Ie. the trust takes oack a second ortgage for the dJf. ference. "On the aver ge. our houses ap- praJse between $ 0,000 to $70,000 and sell for 532.000 t $48.000," said Ms Williams "When the house sells, the Jwners pay back CRAIT loan and keep any lDcrease in value. This keeps people from pa} $46.000 for a house and selling It in a few months for S63,OOO " CRAFl arra ges all f!DanClng througb the Allan a Mortgage Consor- "CabbagetoWD is small but it WIi Itan:ing tD eet gentrified," said the trust's executive director. Peegy Wil- liams. "And there's still some of that I~ ing on. CRAFI addresses the need to have affordable housing and gives the neighborhood a good socioeconomic miL" In addition to building homes, the trust renovates abandoned properties whenever possible. The best use of the existing structure. and land is deter- mined on a case-by-case basis, with some input from the city's Planning and Urban Design Commission. "Most of the homes in Cabbagetown are called 'shotgUn' - three rooms lioed up so you could shoot a shotgun from the front door and it would come out the back.," Ms. Williams said. "Other homes were prefab structures brought in by train for the local millworkers to live in," Several ramshackle shells near the CRAIT offices OD Carroll Street are <- ""':"C- ~ ...:..-- Tract facts Stytes d homes: Cottages and "$hot. gl"" styles Price range: $32,000 to $48.000 Roar plans available: Most designs are twO-bedroom. one-batt1 plans; some in- clude lrIf IOished attics. Home size: 650 to 1.320 square feet Number d ~ completed: 18 Number d ~ Under construC- tion: SIx Pubic schools: C.D. Hubert Elemeo- tar)', Martin l.1Jther Kirc Middle, South- side HIth InIormation: 52I.oe 15 typical of those owned by employees of the old FultoD Bag and Cotton Mill. The trUSt will redesign the structUreS as SSO,OOO duplexes, saving as many fea- tuI'e illi possible: 10-foot cei.l.ings, ex. posed brick fireplaces, porches and a few old-fashioned claw-foot bathtubs. "They'lJ need Dew heating, wiring and plumbing." Ms Williams said. "But it will have a foyer that opens to the liv- ing room, a galley Iatchen with a sepa- rate eating area. maybe a half-bath downstairs, and two bedrooms and a bath upStaIrs With the alley behind it, we 'Il be able to do 8 parkmg pad and a garden area, too." Central air condJtioning is available at an extra cost Bu1 washer-dryer con. nections, doublepane 'Windows, Dew shingle roofs and extra insulation are standard .,)"",.~. - , rage 3 grid location: D5 RANOo6.U. GRANT I Scali Getting there From Downtown. take Intemate 20 east to Boulevard. Turn left on Boulevard and ngrn on ,-iemonai unve. CMFi IIOfT1eS can be found throughout the Cabbage- toWn neighbortlood. Most of the new proJects. like builder Dan White's bouses on Berean Street, are cozy Vlctonan-Style cottages with two bedrooms. one bath, a porch, side (cant.) PHIL MAYEP.."',)~' Robertl Fanner, relaxing In her own home, got tired of the rent increases and purchased a CRAFT home. num. and rates are usually half a per. centage pOlDt below marke1 rate Many buyer; like the secunty of hanng a mo~age that guarantees the same pay. ment for the next 30 years 'Control of their lives' "Except for taxes anc msuranc(:. people know exactJ,. what theIr payment will be," said Ms WillIams "It gwes 1hem control of thelI lives, the chance to matntam their own house and to have some investment In nO' Tired of annual Increases in ber rent. Roberta Farmer found a place of her own two years agG on Savannah Street. "They wanted more rent every vear," saId Mrs Fanner "]t was $275 a ~onth, anc wher. 11 changed to $300, J had to get out" For $328 a month. Mrs Farmer and her son shan a 980.square-foot conage with two bedrooms. one bath, a bay WID. dow in the ea:mg area, a rear deck. dou- ble-pane wmdows and a front porch bnmmIng wl':h poned plants "And n's wann enough to keep the covers off at :ugh!." she saId H MCauley 1\ 0 free/ana wrIle' bos~ In Powder Sprtng:; '. oJ.o",~ . ... '0. >i 0) U ..; U-s 6 ~~.d.l:;"'::I..o '" ~. I: ~ .~, i ~ <,:g.:~ .s 50-= Q,o.~ ;.:.e.Cl'~'O 6 > - c.... c: t:: 6'- C 08i~~&&8>i1.!l! -=e_::'8>ie :2uu u u C c.;: ; o.l:! 0...>4-= ..c::-=U"'u u"el:;J- - '" 8 ...c:.... >i ....>iC_o-S 11;;8..0 CO""uall1;; 0 ~uo.E209-g8~~.... s..c::c1;;::lu",,,,, ~~ --s::l"Uc-~~u "'] 0 --o!:: -S u ~ '" - Ci C ""'O;lE-~a'3':'" E9-;:;S~o.~~g"". u~C:''=co ...e::l'-~~ u c'Oh "" 0. 0. 0. "" _ _ c 50 ""c'a -;:;:.c 8 u l'! c s "" s 0._ 0."'._] _._ 0 en CD C- O .c C) c .- tn :J o .c CD - .c CU -e S 'I- CU o ... ... 'I- .- - tn ~ .- C) C CU - a.. u 'C 9 '" :.c oo~..c:~uV) -5 -5 .,g 7Q Cd -5 "cu '-..c:cu 8 .8 . ....::soo "00.... 5.o.,,].5;..c: ~ EU'c,,_-u.... ~E<E ;l'!~-S & coo-........ ~ t"'..c:....u"'_uN t1) g.-5 ,- :::J g ~ ~-S0"'a'3.,g,,0 r.n C c::....... .... Q) Q,) 2 a '" :s ..::;~ .... ~ -S"'OU c.... "o:=: I..c:Eu",,~ c '" f- u'" ",;:;::lo. .o_c - c "'::l u..c:: '" ::lO<ll 2"" "'s,....::l"" >i ....0 00000"'..0 ~ E lii-g..c::.:" ~ co2 o~u ;'c ;:)..c:.....c::_..loIl_O' .... '" u C " o o ..c:: .... o .0 ~ '" C '" 9 C o o '" 00 C E::i 00 u'" O",>.cn ..c:""""c -,," 0 -g~~~ .- O..c: "" ..c:: 5.f- U ] 0. u 5 "'=-: E -c".o___ 00 ""'- .n'- 00 . -:=: C ;;. "'.-.- 0 l'!8-go u <"1 0 all ;;,^.o c ~~~:= v;i...~~ 00 >i.... '" .... ... 00 0 ::l -Jo en.... - . "" ~eec;~ f-t ~ a-S 'v) !5 :; <.... Yu :;E =~ =!:: >i~ =en .e.~~~ ..Q 0.._ .... ~ ~.~!:: c..>4 U 0 :S '0 "" '" ~;~u E .08 O~ ~ 0 ..c:: 0. c..c:: o C ~ &~.S ~QJ c.::: ECiu:': 98ge t:...."'~ 0.$2 .'" ~ U ~O.... -:os-"" c:.- _ c: cu~....=:::s .s 8.~ ; ~ -- "Q) "'2 s... g-g aII~ 0.- ~~ S8 U .... u ~a 5;:) " -, cC; "'..c: -- U'O -Ss "'>i ~] o I -e en :o~]"" ~ o'c ~ Ci>i~2 ~-g~- ",< 0"2 :=: ...c:: "" :3 frs- 90::: . a ,,"3'"" 0._ "" "~o..~ ~~.....o. U uen 0. ....,::l >i U.....l '" :=:..c:~u "" 000 - ~.: :3 Q) (I:I ... en :>::lau ~ O''''..c: .. ..c..:ac.... a'35..8] :2]",_ u- ~ ~:E'i :~~ ~ - "'- e-5~~ 1;;:.cU.g ':~U;'" := uo. o ",:> '0 ....v;;>c: ~2-g "" s-""~ ,,- UC~ C"" >i 0- '" -g.:-;:! .;.- ~ GJ ,.c..c::';(> f-]::l~ = -.0 ~ a. Q o 13 =' c o -- 1a - ::J U Q) c.. en '"too- o en +.J U Q) '"too- '"too- Q) +.J ..c C> -- '"too- o +.J ~ Q) CD en en +.J en :J t= " -C C ca ...J 1- C I......... v;=-:::,-cot.;:: uS s<l:: u ;;. Co""C c>i"'u IV -~-S8~.o .::"" 0 ~ QJ ~~-d..c:&-S -ucoo.a11 c..c:~-~c o s.U 8:.a:E C ",..c: c u .9v;-;g~~ U 2 c.~~..... U...s"'::l.... o"O~~~1;! .... Co U S::l O'~-:.=..coO 1-0 ..cUCJ..t: .::= ~ g,:.c E u ~ ~.5 _ :t ~ -5 C::-en en -uaOvi'~= ~EuEt-S1;l .~~~~oc ";jE~-- "c:c5lfj..::-~ ;~ u] 8:~ _U ~ "";;. ~r-..c:~_c: :2a~2g~ ~'""8- t;: .... ~ -'- 0..;; ~-g~ ~ . ~!::~~SVicg .;: ~ 5 - ~ ~ ~ -.- - ::l 0Il..Q- ;:;:0"0",, all ..c::::l'_.oOll..c::C uo.~oUt:uVi .~:.- _ V1 o:.c ::s ~O"'EEsO ...:..::t-.~o ~-= c 9-- U.~"'d en oUu;;'CUCO :I:b~8-S~8 l"OC"'O\..o~ I V) I I .'::: U.Ohu,.s:..c:'Vi 0. "'E E ;:: ~ 0 f- ~l'!.E'- 8t:.o-E. .... " ~ u ~"'IVCC ~ ....- 3 ~ ~ 0.':: 0. ~ ~ '" 0 - i:: c_.... C =s..... s::l"" u tl '-'::13 aIIOE~"'C C "'....CUE """ 0"'- 0';:: E ;!l- C ';J; C j:! :3 0 0 C Z ~ <Ii ._~ 'O:.:..c: u ~:. C U > CJ') QJ ,_ <- o.o;Joo ,_ c:: u",,"'c.ouo'" ."".- ..c:......c:0l'!8 u~8"Q) -<2-"uOo.TS-u " ..c:"",'- c.... g::l "'IE go'; :;.- ~~"O'7 ~ 0 0 _ ~ -=Cc"":s~-~"~Q -'-0 '~o u ~ O~EaII -8 'U"8 u i::~0 'uCu .9.> ..c'~e: ~~o tU > ~ ~.~ ::l 0 ~ 2 ~ Q ~ e ........""O..c::iil..."""uO' l:!.53~,=~]c ~ - =' 0 ...,j - 8:.:=:d IV '" rn ,..t:'::l .c 2'- -g" 8 9-"~ZC;8 "'''.:.a......c: 0 l:;J c..c: aII::U &.!l!]]~ 2 0 0.0. o..-_-g "".- l:;J all" 0 o...c:.... C.C co::: ::l ~ .- >. "" 0~o5~::s Q s Z >....t;: u ..c:~ .a;eZ.... :;8~~0"90u;l "=' 0' .....-<:l~ ::J 0 "".:::... O";;JL.... 0..c:~8c-nC,o.. u _ Q E.53 ""~j'O ..c'- ""- f-~~~=O.$213 < - GO 01 at a. e ! 11 :I .,8 III o U ~ ti~...: - .....c ~ ]'.5.8,s -~1 ] ~.- QQ~ ""u.... u..c: 0 .a: v.s -;:;,.s:::l U u_ C; > :2 ~ ~~ ~~..c: >i 'C u - "" 0.:0 ~ 8 ~ -E Z.!J O~-S t:: ..c::""c& Ud~e -S""uo. 1""(,1)'- " '_ -_ 0 (3 ""- -0 c..c: - u._ ",,-,.gE~ c-g;5l;:; """"'" ..c: u ." 0 u ,"9 ~.- -,~ ;;.._ u "'~ 2 g.s:.:::~ o.t:.:!J:.o.,:J o ~ '" '" 0 --~.....o ,~ go (,I)~ ~ ..c "" ::l" a ~ g;g-g.o '-Vi 00 ~ U ::l C 0'- -5~~-~ _ ~o.oQ.J ~ ~ &.: ~ .....oo.o..c:: : ~ ~ 00- ~ Ol) I ... ~:~.$2 ~ ;,J .... ;::.0 ;::.= s "'- o;o."u Q,J..c:: \..0 (J') 8_00 o E- ..c:-g",c t;: _.- u u i:: E"'E::l o"'oc gE.c8. '7 ~ ~ 0. :S " "'0 0 .9~Ci~ ""0;= ..... -;:; '" oU C . ':= i:i 0 ~ tE C..c-""'o ~~~o.,,;:: 0.-.0 >- 0.. ~ ",,';:: "" ~~ EC-d ::3 -.- c;;iA .~-5~ I..;.; 1,)... -"<:' oU""U' ~E~ ;.....9~ "" .... E ail- e;; 1..1:'::: _ ~-.- .,g ~ " -UC -,,<:_t;: C 0." .- 0 C -S ~ "" _....!:: : 0 0 0."';-'0 U u U - C c u..c:.... ~Q.JtU..:!-3 oE7.o.c2 0. - .- ~.905E~'o ;~i~~~ -UUaII:.U c">c~~ uo~ ~-g 2-; 8': >..i5"'u05 "'....c;..c:> ::! E""'" ~., '1J iU .o..c:-oc8-d . o 00'- u 0 0 C ~.- ~-.::l u o.g '" u - Q..c:- _c'ES'''~B ~-o~s.8t;: ._ e~ O..c:'C e - ~ ;;- 00- C e 2 .....- Q .::= 8u _.$2 ~ ~ ,""9-0];:'''''' .:::",;; c;.o ~~"':9g-" co",::lOU~-; ""EC-O ..c :.: U":o s :::!"O ",;;:3 u-.ouu "'- I C '" U "" ,.::l Ou ..c: ,~0."'E;::9->. {_ 00-:"= ..... OC'" ~.."oo- uC 2 ~ 0.. ~ C ;; c~.... -:g,c::.2 ~ ~o,,:-g;;.,go~ .- '" C ~ E - 8..c: ;:3 ~~ ~ 0- 0:3 ~ >iall "'.: ~"'t:~.oc _u ae8.s'O'in;;5- ;,; tj go", ~ g ::l'a ~"",O::l..c:;:::l =s u 0- >ig. S& '-r- . ;0:2 E g ~ 8';:: " o u.... u~~ a~~ ~2u .0 u. .s:" '", - '" ~ '.0- u....>i ;> ~ r;; """,,~ ..c: ;.::: 0'0" f-tlc : C "" .~ c u '" '" 0. >< ;:1 '" -S " u ::l ~ '" '" C ~ S "" o C o u ] 00'0 . co I c:: ~ c; 4.)-'--8 "- - QJ .... '~rJ 00 u~'O'O~ . QUc'::len~ o"O~~u::: u.~ ~~ o5's co ... . a ell.... 8 9~'o;;.530o ~"''''Qo t'::l': 5 "" all ~~""8..c:E'~ - ~ '-::l 'O.c eIl:a ~ 0 ~""c",u..c: "U'-'O .>i .-...i:...."O.~ t!""uo....~ '0.... '^!i:.g U ::l ~ "" :S > ~ 0 0. all e'a : .: 9.5u~ >,=U1:'O'::'O-5'01 'C'- ~ - S U ; ::l Q "d _::l..J--"3~ Qen;; "'-OU- .:!l.g 0 "'05 ~ -st:: u co:-g .~ t.C ~ "- :-' ..>4.u "" u.- go '" :J 0 c l:;J ~ rn -S 3 o.~ 0 .:!l 6 8:: ..... 8 50'0 C ~ a all "" u 0 8" u ~ .;: c::l -- 0 '" "" 'in u-'; -8 9 ~"'C;"3 ::l>>C l:;Ju......c:u 0';: u E ..c: "" L... 4.l ..c:~-:2 ~- u~ 0. ....::l"""'U.1.UC. en ::l u u u..c: Q <II '.. 04.l........t::soo..c:"Q) .... f:.... 0. 0 - u 8 C" o O.Z "" 0 0 0 Os -~:-:: ..-~e .2'O~ZU] 1;;;!l- _- <cu. 2 "'~"'=. : u;;o f- 8.5 C 5.: o c ~ QJ C'+-":':.~ -uOC';;lOu"" ~"i ~~ :3B~ o.~ I - 8 '0 ~ _,~'O _ 0..- u '~O\U ..c:O~Q <Ii ",_.!'oj ~ 00"Q) C .u .w t: ... :j > ....- 8- "'2~0.~~~~:::euo _....:en ....:~'O;c c""I....QC.=O 'O.-cu ~::l"";;;~ C -.::l "".~ "" 0 8 .... C ~ ~ ~ C:.c_ 8~-~ "" .;: ~ u 0 0 :;l u Q C c.- E ~ ;: u '" 05 ::l '_'Qhu ""Q 8 3'c.: ~ 8:8 ~ "".-5 8 8 0 .!! ~ < 0 ~'i 0 6Uo.U u....:.::: U o > 0 u" Ci.u"O c .... U~ &05; 8-Su ~.$2 ..... ':'8 os~i) t.;: '" Q~ .0""- 8Ql:;J~Q ::ls~~l'!ci Cuo::_O\ uQ- U::: -S;!l~-gao '" 8- 0'2 C~ ....... ~"".sc8~ -".....- - o C ... ",8 8 - ~ s.~ N 0 o c~ 3 ;~ 00._ 8 0"" 0\ C 0 aII.o:=: -::l....C"""" 8 8~.<;; S 08'O::l8;: .... o.t:' 00"" ~ U ,,:I:.::: c ...'" U C . - "'0 ;>-.. 0 c:: C -0 ......~ :>-t. C ,-'- ~ ~ 0 c ..... 8.'- c cU "" u .0;.8_ o-S gf::l ~ 0" <1-S~-S ;:~u-""'8u c..Jo. :g .~ t:: Q.c >i"::l ~ '::I ::l ..>4!-5 4J 0 cU u ... t:: (/) ~ 0 .- a.:...c: .... ~ - ~ ::: ; 2''::: en Q ..c: -S-o..uc 0- '-..q"u~ oJ .g ~ to - 0 t: ~ 8 C 0'" cc-.- C "''0_ 0 <II 0'- -2u""..~~:.aS;~Z~-7~ u->"'......'" t;: u.... 8 o~1;l..c:~'O"'u~~..="" 0" ~ 5l "'0;>> S 'O..c: _';:.0 0. c: u.... ..:;:~-1I1.-04J ..c:~o::: C "'....___ ~ ",.-u 8..c: c::lO-..a1~~loI)f _ .:!l C'O.- o!:: o.E s "".: aII>i :3~ ~~'E o~ ':~..c:C; ;j~~] Ov..Jc...."OOu 0.- '" c .... 0.-;:: _ <II _ f- '" "" c 0 u- u..- ... ~- C ..c:..c:U"" o.~~c"';-l::'''' .: ~ t:: t:: ~'" ~ g 0 <II: 2'" 0 C ~ ..,. c C\I O.C '" C .... 0..... u > ~ 0 (.LI C _ ~'in lib 0. '" ~ l-.~,,:.: .1ll1l<jl.l.J. lU1S ,'III JO I!lJ!SSIIUldLl 1111.'1 1',1}UrldJa 266V02 IpdV IAVONOW 531118 NIM1 3H1 .:jO l:l3d'v'd5M3N , .s j (;'! Distributed to Board: _ ..: .-:.1 :~. /? '1 Ii '-1./ -7:? 4' . , . . '\ 70") ~:::>{.r.i?; ~)A--I Agenda !h,m N.~. __.___.~ ~. J . Albemarle County Housing Advisory Committee April 13, 1992 Mr. David Bowerman Chairman, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Bowerman: It is with great pleasure that I am transmitting "A Housing Strategy for Albemarle County" to the Board. The Housing Advisory Committee appointed by the Board of Supervisors has reviewed the issue of affordable housing in Albemarle County, the current programs operating in the County, and the possibilities of instituting new programs for County citizens. The report contains our findings and recommendations. We are hopeful the Board will find the study illuminating and a helpful guide to expanding the housing opportunities to all citizens of theiCounty. The committee found the work interesting and challenging. We appreciated the work of the staff, Kobby Hoffman and student intern, Mary Schukraft. We enjoyed the opportunity to assist the County. If we can be of additional assistance, please call on any or all of us. ~M~ JV~ton M. Webb Vice-Chair enc " ')rSTI<f8UTED TO 80/\:<D A\C;',\8ERS ON ,^, - / - 'i .;;.- ----..-.. (-- ~.~ ;,"':, !--:. j.. ., ( . ICC;i} .; ~~i,,~ ,~.-., i ,'~ -'V"'~Jii~ '\ i 1 !, J l t j f I, I ( / \,1 ~_....J fil' e; L',IUj --, ---nf ......~~ .. , . ,f d" ~ , r j'~ ~ ~ S.() 24 Woodlake Drive Charlottesville, VA 22901 April 25, 1992 .r. David Bowerman, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 101 McIntyre Road ~harlottesville, VA 22901 $ear Mr. Bowerman: We understand our County Board of Supervisors will receive lhe report of the Housing Advisory Committee at the May 6 meet- ng. The Albemarle Housing Coalition instructed me on April 21 o write the Board expressing our enthusiastic endorsement of the ~ommittee's recommendations. I I : The Coalition is a voluntary association of individual ci- tizens and representatives of certain social service agencies in the County. Our prime concern since 1984 has been to improve the $upply of good, affordable housing for low-income persons in our ~rea. A list of active AHC members is enclosed. I I I We were delighted when the Board of Supervisors appointed an Albemarle County Housing Advisory Committee over a year ago. We ~ave been impressed with the Committee's study, analysis, and ~penness to public discussion. We will be watching with keen in- ~erest steps the Board takes to implement the recommendations. I I : Thank you for your attention to the work of the Committee 1nd for the further public review you will be inviting. I Sinc~rely ~td~;[ ~ Sidney/D. Albem,itrle jurs, , \ I '_'~ l-'vLr u.:.....--- Crane, Chairman Housing Coalition ALBEMARLE HOUSING COALITION Members January 1, 1992 ~GENCY AND REPRESENTATIVE ~lbemarle County, 401 McIntyre Rd, 22901-4596 ; David Benish, Planning & Community Develpmt Karen Morris, Social Services I I ~lbemarle Housing Improvement Program : 409-C East High st, 22901 Theresa Tapscott, Director ~harlottesville Housing Foundation 100 Court Square Annex, Suite E, 22901 : Robert H. Cooper, 105 Ivy Ridge Rd, 22901 I I I ~harlottesville Housing Improvement Program : 106 Goodman, 22902 : Holly Olinger, Director I I I ~itizens for Albemarle : Frances Lee-Vandell, Rt 5, Box 316, 22904 I tndependence Resource Center, 201 West Main st, 22901 Herman Key yefferson Area Board for the Aging (JABA) : 2300 Commonwealth Drive, Suite B-1, 22901 : Gordon Walker, Director : Padma Ball Legal Aid Society (CALAS), PO Box 197, 22902 : Sue Bishop Monticello Area Community Action Agency (MACAA) I 215 East High st, 22901 Peggy Kidd, Albemarle Resource Coordinator I I Thomas Jefferson Health District PO Box 7546, 22906 ~homas Jefferson Planning District Commission I 413 East Market st, 22901 Kobby Hoffman , ~niversity of Virginia , Telephone 296-5823 972-4010 293-5708 979-0967 979-0937 293-2447 293-9893 971-9629 978-3644 977-0553 295-3171 972-6208 972-1720 , . - .. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 401 MciNTIRE ROAD CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901-4596 I I Mfmo To: I From: Members of the Board of Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, :::e~" April 15, 1992 Housing Committee Report closed is the report of the Housing Committee. This is distributed night so that you might have time to review it before the formal I Pfesentation is made to the Board on May 6. I I I I I I I I llen/ I I Erclosure I I I I I I I I I