Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201500028 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2015-07-08 (3)C©mmuN WEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMEA i OF r RAiv5PVR r a n lulu 1601 Orange Road CWP re: Yryimi- 22701 Charles ,m. Rllpatricx, P.E. camrninNien.. July 7; 20 t D Ms. Megan Yaniglu5 Cuu„ty of Albe„ta,ie De.artme,,t or Cummut,ity Developnrz�„t 401 McIntire icoad Charlottesville. VA 22902 Re: SDP -2015 -00028 - Old Trail Blocks 10. 16,17 & 18 Dear Ms. Yaniglos: We have reviewed the Initial Site plan; submitted by Roudabush, Gale & A33ociate3, L.C., with a plan dates of May 8, 2015, and we offer the tollowing comments: 1. All sheets should be sibs,i by a prufe53;u.al enginee, u, clearly narked "Preliminary". 2. A plan legend should be provided. 3. The design speed should be provided on the plan sheets and t.rofije3. 4. i nu existing and proposed curb types and signage should be clearly labeled througnv,,,t the plµ., 3ncets. 5. The radius of all intersection returns, ,,,z;aaured fro,,, the tace of curb_ should be labeled. The minirnurn radius is 2D7 . 6. The angle between road centerlines at each skew should be clearly moeled. 7. Ail existing and proposed easements within or imtneaimely adjacent to State maintained rignt - -Wr -,ry ay should oe clen, ly labeled (include the use and legal reterence). 8. Clearly identify all roadways to re.mi, privately „ta;utained ort the layout sheets. 9. When on street parking is on one side onl., ul:.u,ly identify tnu side of street the parking will be locates_ including the location of "No rarking -" si..,s. 10. Road puutilm should be includes with this submival. 11. Line -Vr 3ight profiles Snould be it,uIuded with this submittal. Sight line triangles should include the available signt 13tance, ort.ct trom the eage of travel way and centerline oftset. 12. Utility profiles and computations should be provided. 13. A detail 3huu15 be proviacd showing the roadway layout with HDT of each roadway. 14. Roadway Typical Section: l he sidewalk and butfer`planting strip cross -slope should be shown graphically. Street tries shuuln al3u be shvwt, graphically with a ainnension to the back of curb as applicable. The roadway dear„ 3pced shouiu also be identified. 15. Pavettent Marking/Signage Plan a. PavZment markings and 5ignage should be Shawn on the plan view and tv 3z:alc. b. All markings and appiupria,e signage shall be shawn in accordance witn the current vet5ion of the MUTCD and/or the Virginia Supplement lu the 1vtU i CD. c. Individual signs snuuia nave the MUTCD sign label ,eterence included U11 the plan. I6. We pretei all utilities to cross perpendicular to the street. For c7carnple: tnc sanitary Sewer fiv.,, thu Alley, Black 16_ c,ubsing Upland Drive as well as the sewer crossin5 Guir Dn ,,e, BIucK 16. 17. ror ease of review ail storm and sanitary structu,e labels should be added to the plan Sheets. 18. When an open cut is necessary for a utility tie -in it should be du,,c i„ accordaMCC with the land use permit (LUP -OC) — Open -cut Pavement Restoration Requirements. 19. Sight lines snuuid be prr video ter the Alley �4 t,ance. in Block 17. untu Fielding Run Drive. 20. The minimum centerline radius (up to 2000 ADT) is 200'. Tnc centerline ,adius, Block 18 Rvwcroa5_ Shuuld be updated accordingly. 21. A multi -way stop co„ t,uI can be usetul as a safety measure at intersections provides certain traffic cuAitions exist. An engineeri,tg Study should be perfunned to determine if multi -way stoYS should n4 imtalled. Fur caample: the intersection at Golf Dive and Fielding Run Drive as well as intersection of U1,ja d Drive anU Golf Dive. If you .xcd further i „tonnatiun concerning this project. please do not hesitate to contact me at �434) 422 -9894. Si„ce,ely_ Shelly A. Plaster Land Development Engineer Cuipcper District W= REEF ORtyIM[m MU0190