HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201500098 Review Comments Final Plat 2015-07-14Christopher Perez
From:
Christopher Perez
Sent:
Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:00 AM
To:
'Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC'
Subject:
SUB2015 -98 Ruddock - BLA
Attachments:
Health Department approval.pdf
Richard,
I offer the following revised comments on the revision in light of the 2009 Roger Ray plat recorded in DB
3838 -354 and HD approval (attached):
1. [18- 6.4(D)2] Boundary line adjustment between a nonconforming lot and a conforming lot. One or more
boundary lines between a nonconforming lot and a conforming lot may be adjusted provided: 1. The
boundary line adjustment does not make the conforming lot nonconforming or the nonconforming lot
more nonconforming; and 2. If the lots are in the rural areas zoning district, the boundary line
adjustment does not result in an increase in the number of lots or dwelling, units that could otherwise be
established on each lot.
It appears that Francis MacCall, Principle Planner with Albemarle County has spoken with you about
the proposal and the relinquishment of the original development right associated with TMP 119 -22A and
the utilization of one of the five development rights from TMP 119 -22 to facilitate the BLA. In order to
track the development rights appropriately replace notes #7 & #8 on the plat with the following note:
"Parcel 22A Tax Map 119 is assigned I development right from Parcel 22 and may not be further
divided. Parcel 22 Tax Map 119 is retaining 4 development rights and may be further divided. " Rev 1.
Comment Addressed
2. [14- 303(C)] County GIS depicts a noncontiguous portion of Tax Map 119 Parcel 56 along the Southern
parcel boundary shared with Tax Map 119 Parcel 17A and Tax Map 119 Parcel 22 (see attached GIS
depiction). Also, attached I am providing a recorded plat by Roger Ray circa 2008, which depicts such a
residue parcel (see sheet 3 of the PDF). Please revise the plat to depict this parcel and all applicable
information for it. Rev 1. Comment not adequately addressed. Please provide a recorded plat which
depicts the portion of TMP 119 -56 in question in the location you have suggested. Rev I research:
Roger Ray 2009 plat in DB 3838 -354, depicts the non - continuous portion of the parcel I've been
talking about as "Parcel W" and having been depicted as an error, and has incorrect property
lines. The plat insists the new boundary between 22 and 17A the road Deanna Lane. Comment
adequately addressed.
3. [14- 303(D)] Lot acreages. To avoid confusion, on the plat combine the two labels "Parcel 119-
22_122.322 Acres" and "Revised Parcel l 19- 22_112 009 Acres by c ^1rulation ". Rev 1. Comment
Addressed.
4. [14- 303(D)j Lot acreages. On the plat clearly list how much acreage is contained in the original Parcel
22A, currently it is not clear. Also, on the plat utilize land hooks to depict the portions of TMP 119 -22A
that are being added to TMP 119 -22. Also depict where on the plat the 0.354 acres of TMP 119 -22A is
located that is being added to TMP 119 -22. Revise appropriately.
Rev 1. The plat has been revised in an attempt to clarify the acreages; however, it still is not
clearly depicted. Currently the plat has two portions listed as: "Portion of 119 -22A being added to
119 -22 (0.354 Acres Total) ", one portion on the left and one on the right. This actually makes it
appear like there are two segments of 119 -22A that are each 0.354 acres and each is being added
to 119 -22. The area tabulations chart is the only item which helps provide clarity. The land hooks
would be simpler and avoid confusion. I'll leaving this one up to your professional opinion on how
to handle it (leave it as is, or revise w/ land hooks).
5. [14- 303(0)] Signature panel. On the plat provide a signature line for the Subdivision Agent. This
signature line shall be provided immediately below the owner's signature /notary statement. Revise
appropriately. Rev 1. Comment Addressed.
6. [14- 302(B)(1)] General Information. When the plat is revised, please provide the date of the last
revision on the plat.
Rev]. Comment Addressed.
7. [14 -309 & 14 -3101 Soil evaluations & Health director approval of septic systems. The submitted soils
evaluations were forwarded to the Health Department, pending their approval. The plat cannot be
approved until their approval is received.
Rev 1. The County received Health Department approval on 7- 14 -15.
Additional comment since revision
8. [14 -309 & 14 -3101 The plat has been revised to depict proposed drainfields which appear to slightly
cross the proposed southern property line of the revised TMP 119 -22A. This is not permitted, rather the
drainfields are to be located entirely on the lot created. Either revise the drainfield depiction on the plat
to go back to how it was originally shown on the initial plat or revise the proposed southern property
line to encompass the entire drainfields. The end result of either action should be that the drainfields are
to be located entirely on the lot created.
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443