Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002-09-04
ACTIONS Board of Supervisors Meeting of September 4, 2002 September 12, 2002 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 AGENDA ITEM/ACTION Call to Order. · Meeting was called to order 9:00 a.m., by the Chairman, Ms. Thomas. All BOS members were present. Also present were Bob Tucker, Larry Davis, Ella Carey and Wayne Cilimberg. From the Public: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda. · Rick Oliver, a resident of South Forest Lakes, expressed opposition to adding 500 additional seats at Monticello High School. He asked the Board to support the decision made by the School Board to add only 300 seats. · Jack Marshall provided Board members with information on the newly formed organization, Advocates for a Sustainable Albemarle Population, (ASAP) and announced that they would be holding their first conference on Saturday, September 28, 2002. · David Blount, TJPDC Legislative Liaison, provided a brief update on development of the legislative program for FY 2003. Introduction of New Police Captains. · Chief Miller introduced Captain Crystal Limerick, responsible for the Patrol and Community Policing Divisions, and Captain Neil Kearns, responsible for the Investigative and Administrative Divisions. FY 2002 Appropriations, $338,597 (Forms #2001084, 2001085, 2001086). · APPROVED. Reapproval of University of Virginia Health Services Foundation Facility at Forest Lakes North Park and Ride Agreement. · AUTHORIZED County Executive to execute the addendum to the agreement. Request to amend Leash Law to include area located along Route 720 (Harris Creek Road) located off of Route 20 South · DEFERRED until October 9, 2002. Resolution to accept roads in Blandemar Farms Estates into the Secondary System of Highways. · ADOPTED the attached resolution. Request for dance hall permit by Mountain View Grill. · DEFERRED until October2, 2002. Clerk: Clerk: Clerk: Clerk: Clerk: Clerk: ASSIGNMENT Acknowledge comments in letter for Chairman's signature. Forward signed appropriation forms to Melvin Breeden, with copies to Roger Hildebeidel and appropriate persons. Forward original signed copy to Health Services Foundation, with copy to Juan Wade. Advertise for public hearing and place on October 9, 2002 Board agenda. Forward signed resolution and SR-5A form to Glenn Brooks. (Attachment 1) Place on October 2, 2002 Board agenda. -1- Transportation Matters. Jim Bryan: · VDOT has finished its slurry seals for the year. Slurry is a driveway sealant that is put in subdivisions to lengthen the life of pavement. Charles Martin: · Thanked VDOT forwhat they did on Route 600. David Bowerman: · Mentioned the use of crosswalk markers on Jefferson Park Avenue. He is not sure what they are officially called but they are visual indicators that alert drivers that they are approaching a crosswalk. He asked that these be considered for use near the Senior Center and on Hillsdale Drive. Sally Thomas: · Near University Hall, in the area of the track, she recently noticed a place where there is a crosswalk, and the pedestrian can push a button and the lights in the pavement will blink. She asked VD©T to look into the effectiveness and expense of this for possible use in the County. · The MPO has a draft of a scope of work for plans for Route 29 North. She can provide more details for anyone who is interested. Dennis Rooker · Asked about the process for installation of street light to illuminate an area. Mr. Tucker said that would be handled through the County Engineering Department; he would get Mark Graham to contact Mr. Rooker. There is a permitting process that goes through VD©T, but it is County funded. · Asked who to call regarding cleanup of dead animals on a state road. Mr. Bryan responded VDOT. · Asked VDOT to look at the sequence of the traffic light at the intersection of Rio Road and Route 29 on Sundays. The light changes on the second car while drivers are trying to cross 29 to Rio. · Asked VDOT to look at various traffic issues at Colthurst including lowering the speed limit to 45 mph at an earlier point, installing a left turn lane for people heading west turning into Colthurst and installing a right hand taper lane. Mr. Bryan said he would call Mr. Rooker. Jim Bryan: Respond to issues raised. -2- 10 Lindsay Dottier: · Asked if VDOT had any plans for the intersection of Mill Creek Drive and Route 20 in light of the new apartment complex being built. Also, the section of road between Route 20 and Route 53 remains dangerous and needs to continuously be looked at. Mr. Bryan commented that VDOT's traffic engineer is looking into installing a flashing light at the Route 20/53. · Said there is a sight distance problem at the intersection of Route 6 and James River Road. There will be a tremendous amount of traffic with the new Food Lion going in. He asked VDOT to take a look at the intersection. Bob Tucker: · Said VDOT and County staff are looking at a design for a roundabout at the intersection of Airport Road and Dickerson Road. They do not have all the data at this time. This will come to the Board and Airport Authority for approval. Ms. Thomas suggested Mr. Bryan find a location where a roundabout design is used so Board members can go take a look. Request to amend the jurisdictional areas of the Albemarle County Service Authority to provide water service to TM 32, P 24H (Joyce and Duane Smith), located on Pritchett Lane off Proffit Road. · APPROVED amending the jurisdictional areas to provide water service only to existing structures on TM 32, P 24H. · For future policy considerations, the Board requested staff to determine if there are meters on other properties on Pritchett Lane that do not have public water. Also, if there are other properties on the same side of Pritchett Lane, as the Smiths, that already have public water and if any of the properties were grandfathered. Request to amend the jurisdictional areas of the Albemarle County Service Authority to provide water service to TM 78, P 43A, (Phil Hawkins), located at the Rt 250E/I-64 Interchange. · APPROVED amending the jurisdictional areas to provide water service only to existing structures on TM 78, P 43A. Proposed FY 2003 Budget Amendment. · APPROVED amending the FY 2003 budget in the amount of $16,466,233.77, and APPROVED appropriations #2003005, 2003006, 2003007, 2003008, 2003009, 2003010. Planninq staff: Proceed as directed. Planninq staff: Proceed as directed. Clerk: Forward signed appropriation forms to Melvin Breeden, with copies to Roger Hildebeidel and appropriate staff persons. -3- 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Discussion: Request to amend the jurisdictional areas of the Albemarle County Service Authority to provide water service to TM21, P13 (Mickey and Barbara Pugh) located at 4954 Dickerson Road. · No action necessary. Board to Board Presentation, School Board Chairman. · Received. Update: County's Strategic Planning Framework. · Received. Mr. Tucker asked if Board members have any comments, send them to him. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on The Agenda. · Took up at end of meeting. Closed Session: Personnel Matters. · At 11:26 a.m., the Board went into closed session to consider appointments to boards and commissions, to discuss acquisition of property for a public use, to consult with legal counsel and staff regarding pending litigation, to consult with legal counsel and staff regarding probable litigation and to consult with legal counsel regarding specific legal matters. Certify Closed Session. · The Board reconvened into open session at 1:35 p.m., and certified the closed session. Appointments. · REAPPOINTED Sonny Beal and Frederick A. Missel, as the University of Virginia representatives, on the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Citizens Advisory Committee, with terms to expire December 31,2004. · REAPPOINTED Joseph T. Samuels, Jr., to the Ace Appraisal Review Committee, with term to expire December 13, 2003. · REAPPOINTED Franklin P. Micciche (Rivanna District), George R. Larie (Jack Jouett District), James E. Clark, Jr. (Scottsville District), W. Ivar Mawyer (Samuel Miller District), Dabney B. Sandridge (White Hall District), and C. Marshall Thompson (Rio District) to the Equalization Board, with terms to expire on December 31,3003. · REAPPOINTED Bruce W. Kirtleyto the Piedmont Housing Alliance, with term to expire December 2, 2005. · REAPPOINTED Samuel A. Anderson, as the University of Virginia representative, on the Planning Commission. SP-2002-021. Carmichael Motors - Auto Sales (Signs #23&24). · DENIED SP-2002-021. SP-2002-030. Carmichael Motors - Outdoor Clerk: Prepare appointment letters, with copies to appropriate persons, and update Boards and Commissions book. -4- 20 21 22 23 14 Storaqe and Display (Siqns #66&81). · DENIED SP-2002-030. Appeal: SDP-2002-45. Carmichael Motors Preliminary Site Plan - Critical Slopes Waiver Denial. · UPHELD Planning Commission's denial of critical slopes waiver. SP-2002-022. 20 South Kitchen (Si.qns · APPROVED as recommended by Planning Commission. SP-2002-031. Puopolo Cottaqe (Si.qns #72&73). · APPROVED as recommended by Planning Commission. SP-2002-033. Bentivar Subdivision - Reconfi.quration (Si.qn #77). · APPROVED as recommended by Planning Commission. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda. · ADOPTED the attached Emergency Ordinance establishing that violation of Executive Order 33 issued by Governor shall be Class 3 Misdemeanor. Sally Thomas: · Announced that the High Growth Coalition recently met with the Secretaries of Natural Resources and Commerce. Dennis Rooker: · Asked the Board to schedule a public hearing on the Mountain Protection Plan Ordinance. The Board scheduled a discussion on this item for their September 11,2002 meeting. 24 Adjourn to September 11,2002. · At 3:05 p.m., the Board adjourned until 7:00 p.m., September 11, 2002. Clerk: Clerk: Clerk: Clerk: Set out conditions of approval below. (Attachment 2) Set out conditions of approval below. (Attachment 2) Set out conditions of approval below. (Attachment 2) Forward signed ordinance to County Attorney's office and send copy to Bill Brent. /ewc Attachment 1 - Blandemar Farms Estates Resolution Attachment 2 - Conditions of Approval for Planning items Attachment 3 - Emergency Ordinance -5- Attachment 1 The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the 4th day of September 2002, adopted the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the streets in Blandemar Farms Estates Subdivision, described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated September 4, 2002, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the roads in Blandemar Farms Estates, as described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated September 4, 2002, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the recorded plats; and FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. The roads described on Additions Form SR-5(A) are: 1) Blandemar Drive (State Route 1041) from the intersection of Route 705 (Taylor's Gap Road) to the intersection of Route 1042 ~Naldemar Drive), as shown on plat recorded 03/11/98 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-325, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.27 mile. 2) Blandemar Drive (State Route 1041) from the intersection of Route 1042 (1Naldemar Drive) to .61 miles East of Route 1042 (Waldemar Drive), as shown on plat recorded 03/11/98 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-325, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.61 mile. 3) Blandemar Drive (State Route 1041) from .61 miles East of Route 1042 ~Naldemar Drive) to the intersection of Route 1043 (Chopin Road), as shown on plat recorded 03/11/98 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-325, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.74 mile. 4) Blandemar Drive (State Route 1041) from the intersection of Route 1043 (Chopin Road) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 03/11/95 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-328, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.54 mile. 5) Chopin Drive (State Route 1043)from the intersection of Route 1041 (Blandemar Drive) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 05/05/95 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1732, pages 692-703, with a 50-foot right-of- way width, for a length of 0.53 mile. -6- 6) Waldemar Drive (State Route 1042) from the intersection of Route 1041 (Blandemar Drive) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 03/11/95 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-328, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.77 mile. Total Mileage - 3.46 mile. -7- Attachment 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agenda Item No. 21. SP-2002-022. 20 South Kitchen (Si.qns #85&86). Request to allow Home Occupation, Class B for catering business, in accord w/§10.2.2(31) of the Zoning Ord. TM 102, P 17E, contains 65 acs. Loc on E sd of Rt 20, N of its intersec w/Rt 708 at 1138 Roundtop Farm. Znd RA. Scottsville Dist. There shall be no on-site sales; There shall be no outdoor storage of materials; and All requirements of the Health Department shall be satisfied. Agenda Item No. 22. SP-2002-031. Puopolo Cottaqe (Si.qns #72&73). Request for an office/cottage in accord w/§10.2.2(31) & §5.2 of the Zoning Ord. TM 103, P 50 (contains 3.$06 acs), P 34M (contains 35.554 acs), & P 34G (contains 30.069 acs). Loc on S sd of Rolling Rd (Rt 620), approx 600 ft S of Rt 620 & Rt 795 intersec. Znd RA. Scottsville Dist. 4. 5. 6. There shall be no outdoor storage of materials; To limit the amount of business-related vehicular traffic, there shall be no more than four (4) on- site business meetings per month with sales representatives, labor workers, production manager, and other personnel related to the operation of this home occupation; There shall be no on-site sales of materials; Parcels 34M, 50, and 34G shall be combined prior to the issuance of a Zoning clearance for this use. Parcels shall be combined within sixty (60) days after Board of Supervisor approval; Requirements of VODT for sight distance and sight distance easement (if necessary) shall be completed within sixty (60) days after Board of Supervisor approval; The construction of the storage shed, as shown on the sketch plan (Attachment A), shall be completed and all outdoor storage associated with this use shall be contained inside the storage shed within sixty (60) days after Board of Supervisor approval; and If all conditions are not met within sixty (60) days after Board of Supervisor approval, the use shall be discontinued. Agenda Item No. 23. SP-2002-033. Bentivar Subdivision - Reconfi.quration (Si.qn #77). Request to allow resubdivision of 6 parcels in Bentivar Subdivision in accord w/§10.5.2.1 .a of the Zoning Ord. TM 46, Ps 135, 136, 136A, 137, 137A, & 138A, contains 14.318 acs. Loc on Bentivar Dr (Rt 1033) approx 800 ft from intersec of Rt 1033 & Rt 643. Znd PA. Rivanna Dist. The development rights granted by this special use permit shall be used in lieu of the six (6) remaining theoretical development rights on the property; Driveways in the proposed reconfiguration shall be separated by a minimum of 75 feet; and The applicant shall secure a signed final plat for the proposed division within two years of the approval date of this permit, or this permit shall expire. -8- Attachment 3 ORDINANCE NO. 02- E(1) AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THAT A VIOLATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 33 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA ON AUGUST 30, 2002 SHALL BE A CLASS 3 MISDEMEANOR IN THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Honorable Mark R. Warner, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, issued Executive Order Number 33, Declaration of a State of Emergency Due to Extreme Drought Conditions Throughout the Commonwealth, effective August 30, 2002; and WHEREAS, Section C of Executive Order Number 33 prohibits any person or household who utilizes surface waters or ground water in Albemarle County from watering lawns, washing vehicles, filling swimming pools, and irrigating golf courses with the following exceptions: commercial car washes, pools used by health care facilities for patient care and rehabilitation, and watering of golf course tees and greens between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; and WHEREAS, Section C of Executive Order Number 33 further provides that Albemarle County may establish, collect, and retain fines for a violation of the restrictions promulgated therein; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County finds that a violation of Executive Order Number 33 should parallel a violation of Albemarle County Code Section 16-500, Conservation of Water During Emergencies, and be enforced as a Class 3 Misdemeanor; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors further finds that an emergency exists requiring the adoption of this Ordinance without prior published notice pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.2-1427. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED THAT: (1) A violation of any restriction on the use of surface waters or ground water set forth in Section C of Executive Order Number 33 issued by the Honorable Mark R. Warner, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, effective August 30, 2002, or as it thereafter may be amended, shall be a Class 3 Misdemeanor in the County of Albemarle, Virginia and the County shall prosecute and enforce these restrictions and collect and retain fines for violations of these restrictions. (2) The County Executive is authorized and directed to enforce the restrictions in Albemarle County by utilizing County employees and resources as he deems necessary. (3) This Ordinance shall take effect immediately, being adopted under emergency procedures pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.2-1427, and shall remain in effect not longer than sixty days unless readopted in conformity with the applicable provisions of the Virginia Code. -9- PLEASE SIGN BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA FROM THE PUBLIC NAME (Please print clearly) PHONE NUMBER/ADDRESS 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 RECEIVED AT BOS MEETING ~ Date: ~-'~- .~- ~2_ ~ Agenda Item #: --1' Clerk3 InE~s: AS~ Presentation to the ~ oemar~e ~oara ol ~upe~isors by Jack M~shall, September 4, 2002 Good morning. I'm Jack Marshall, and I live in Albemarle County. I'm here to inti-oduce to you a new regional civic organization: Advocates for a Sustainable Albemarle Population (ASAP). After months of work, ASAP is going public on September 28 with a conference titled "The Myth of Endless Growth: Our Region's Future at Risk". The organization is an idea whose time probably came 8 or 10 years ago. It was created now because a growing number of local residents - in Albemarle and neighboring localities - see three pretty obvious things: First, Albemarle County's population is growing fast - indeed, at a pace faster than India. Using data from the Planning Department, we've cai culated that every day the county gains 5 additional people - and 3.7 more cars. At our rate of 2.1% per year, in the next 17 years our county will add 40,000 additional people - equivalent to the current population of Charlottesville. Second, this growth is simply not sustainable. It erodes our quality of life and degrades our environment. As you know better than anyone, virtually all the county's problems are caused or exacerbated by population growth. Conversely, there are NO county problems that will be solved by more population growth Third, we're not doing enough to slow and eventually stop growth, in part because too many of our leaders have bought into the myth that growth is inevitable, Our County lacks an explicit comprehensive population policy. And our Planning Department explains publicly that its approach is simply to accommodate to growth, not to stem it. We argue that we should start immediately not merely to slow growth, but, somewhere down the road, to stop it. We don't pretend to know yet how this will be done, nor what "optimal" population we should aim at, nor when the stationary population size should be reached - it certainly won't happen in the next few years. But if, as we believe, our population can not ,grow endlessly, we should be planning how the end of growth will occur, and ~what our county will look like then. ASAP looks forward to working with you, the Planning Commission, and the Planning Department staffin a cooperative - not an adversarial - spirit. ASAP will operate primarily through education and research. We'll also come to you occasionally in an advocacy role, and we'll also be working - I hope with you and the staff- to develop a model population policy for the county. Our first effort at community education will be a free conference on Saturday morning, September 28. Speakers include · Paul Danish, the supervisor from Boulder, Colorado, who in 1976 authored Boulder's original growth management plan; Jim Burton, a Loudoun County Supervisor; · Ron Rosenberg, a William & Mary law professor familiar with Virginia laws affecting growth management; · And our own Rich Collins, who will discuss the ethics of stopping - or not stopping - population growth. We expect the message of the morning to be optimism that we CAN control growth, that we are not powerless to control our demographic fate. We very much hope you will attend. ASAP intends to play a constructive role in helping us all learn more about one of the most important social, economic, political, and environmental forces in our county - population growth - and in supporting you to make difficult decisions to manage it. Whereas, Whereas, Whereas, Whereas, Whereas, Whereas, Whereas, How, Therefore, ST~O~B, HTS MA TOE A ~ I q;q;B, RB, HC'E the youth of our nation are its future; and working together to help others bridges the differences that separate Americans andstrengthen the bonds that tie us together; and we, the American people have a tradition of philanthropy andvolunteerism; and many of our citizens need the help of others to live happy andproductive lives; and millions of individuals have already enhanced the lives of others on the eleventh annual day of doing good by giving where there was a need, rebuilding what had been torn down, teaching where there was a desire to learn, and inspiring those who had lost hope; and USA WEBKBJVcD Magazine and its affiliate newspapers and The Points of Light Boundation and its affiliate volunteer centers have joined to promote an annualnational day of doing good that celebrates andstrengthens the spi~t of volunteer service; and volunteer services is an investment in the future we allmust share; we, the Albemarle County ~oard of Supervisors, do hereby proclaim October 26, 2002 Students Make A ~ifference ~ay in Albemarle County, Virginia, and urge our. fellow citizens to encourage and assist our students in completing projects to benefit the community. Signed andSealed this 4'~ day of September, 2002. Sally ~l. Thomas, Chairman Albemarle County ~oard of Supervisors To: Members, Board of Supervisors From: Ella Washington Carey, CMC, Clerk Subject: Reading List for September 4, 2002 Date: August 28, 2002 February 6, 2002 March 25 (A), 2002 June 5, 2002 July 3, 2002 July 8, 2002 July IQ, 2002 Pages I - 27 (end with Item ~12) - Ms. Thomas Ms. Thomas Pages I - 26 - Mr. Dottier Pages 27 - end - Mr. Rooker Pages I - 22 (end at Item #13) - Mr. Bowerman Pages 22 (begin with Item #13) - end - Mr. Perkins Ms. Thomas Mr. Martin NOTE: PLEASE REMEMBER TO PULL YOUR MINUTES IF YOU HAVE NOT READ THEM. ~wc COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Requested FY 2002 Appropriations SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Request approval for Appropriations #2001084, 2001085, and 2001086 for various school and local government projects for FY 2002. STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Hildebeidel; Ms. White AGENDA DATE: September 4, 2002 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: ACTION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Additional FY 2002 appropriations are required to provide additional funding authority for grant programs, self-sustaining fund programs and support services for various school and local government programs. DISCUSSION: This request involves three separate FY 2002 appropriations to be approved. A detailed description of these appropriations is provided on Attachment A. The total of these requested additional appropriations is $338,597 which is less than the threshold level for a budget amendment, however, if total additional appropriations made for FY 2002 cause that threshold to be reached, a budget amendment may be required at a future date. In that case, ,these appropriations would be incorporated into it. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Appropriations #2001084, 2001085, and 2001086 for various school and local government programs for FY 2002. APPROPRIATION #2001084 Attachment A $9,000.00 This grant was originally awarded and appropriated in FY 2001 for 3 Automated External Defibrillators for Fire/Rescue. The actual expenditure of funds took place in FY 2002. This request appropriates the balance of the grant operations funded at 50% with state grant money and 50% with local matching funds. The local match was funded from current operations. APPROPRIATION #2001085 $74,279.43 This appropriation covers funding authority for seven different School Self-Sustaining Fund programs. Albemarle County Public Schools is a partner in Virginia's four-year old Preschool Initiative, Bright Stars. As part of the partnership Albemarle County provides transportation and meals (breakfast, lunch, snack) to participating children through the US Department of Agriculture's Child Care and Adult Day Care Program. The program reimburses the school division for meals based on the student's participation and qualification for free or reduced priced meals. Albemarle County was reimbursed $29,464.47 for FY 2002. The Adult Education Program is a federally and state funded program, providing educational opportunities to adults whose skills in reading, mathematics and other subjects are below the 12th grade level. State funding for the Adult Basic Education Program was increased by $9,785.00 from the original FY 2002 budget amount of $63,736.00. Also additional revenues were received in the amount of $168.50 from students for book fees already incurred. The General Adult Education program is a federally funded program that provides instructional services to meet the needs of adults who are working toward a high school diploma. The actual revenues received exceeded the anticipated revenues by $3,196.00. There is also a fund balance from FY 2001 in the amount of $1,924.51. These funds will help to cover the expenses of the General Adult Education for FY 2002. The Drivers Safety Fund consists of driver's education behind the wheel and the motorcycle safety programs. Approximately 700 students are trained each year in Driver Safety. Operating before school, after school, and in the summer, students receive 20 hours of training. The latest driving techniques and decision-making skills are emphasized. Albemarle County received $24,447.00 from the State in revenue for driver's education for FY 2002, which funds wages for instructors. The Technology Literacy Challenge Fund Grant award was not fully expended in FY 2001. The grant has a fund balance of $2,229.45, which is requested to be re-appropriated for FY 2002. Also, the Program for Seamless Transition (POST) grant award was not fully expended in FY 2001. The grant has a fund balance of $2,365.01, which is requested to be re-appropriated for FY 2002. The Jefferson Region Destination Imagination (DI) Program, which provides a regional DI competition for county students and surrounding schools districts, has received additional revenues in the amount of $699.49 from the proceeds of T-shirt sales. These funds help to cover the expenses of the DI program. APPROPRIATION #2001086 $255,317.72 This appropriation covers adjustments to the FY 2002 appropriations for the following School Self- Sustaining Fund Programs: The Vehicle Maintenance Fund was established to account for the cost of all of the fuel, lubricants, and parts used to repair the local government vehicles serviced and fueled at the School Division's Vehicle Maintenance Facility ("Bus Shop"). The fund had higher than anticipated fuel costs and greater than anticipated fueling usage in FY 2002. This appropriation provides $100,195.81 for additional vehicle and equipment fuel costs, which are offset by an additional $100,195.81 of revenue from fuel charges. The School Board approved a contract for Albemarle County Schools Food Services to provide catering services for the Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR) staff during their period of rental of Monticello High School. The AIMR Food Services Fund exceeded its appropriated budget during FY 2002 because of higher than anticipated food costs and food usage. This appropriation provides $115,121.91 to cover the additional cost of food supplies, offset by $115,121.91 of revenue from the AIMR Summer Food Services. The School Division's Food Services, a self-sustaining fund, which operates in 23 schools generates capital for food, labor and equipment. This appropriation request involves the re-appropriation of $40,000.00 from FY 2001 fund balances into FY 2002 to cover the additional cost of Food Services wages, FICA, and machinery and equipment purchases. FMS2 I COUN~ OF AEBEMAREE APP # 2004 08a REVISED 6/84 APPROPRIATION DATE 9/16/02 BATCH NUMBER EXPLANATION: FIRE/RESCUE AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS. SUB. LEDGER GENERAL LEDGER TYPE FUND DEPT OBJEC3 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODEAMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 1 1555 32015 800100 MACH. & EQUIP. J 1 9,000.00 2 1555 24000 240000 STATE GRANT J 2 4,500.00 2 1555 51000 512004 TRS FROM G/F J 2 4,500.00 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J TOTAL 18,000.00 0.00 0.00 I PREPARED BY: MELVIN BREEDEN DATE: 09/16/02 BD. OF SUPV. APPROVAL: ELLA W. CAREY DATE: 09/16/20002 ACCT. APPROVAL: DATE: ENTERED BY: DATE: FMS2 I COUN~ OF AEBEMAREE APP # 2004 08~ REVISED 6/84 APPROPRIATION DATE 08/19/2002 BATCH NUMBER EXPLANATION: VARIOUS SCHOOL PROGRAMS SUB. LEDGER GENERAL LEDGER TYPE FUND DEPT OBJEC'I ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODEAMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 1 3307 61129 600200 Food Supplies J 1 29,464.47 1 3115 63322 132100 PT Wages Teacher J 1 9,089.64 1 3115 63322 210000 FICA I J 1 695.36 1 3115 63322 601300 Ed/RecSupplies J 1 168.50 1 3133 63321 132100 PT Wages Teacher J 1 4,750.00 1 3133 63321 210000 FICA I J 1 370.51 1 3305 61235 132100 PT Wages Teacher J 1 22,709.71 I 3305 61235 210000 FICA I J I 1 ,737.29 1 3131 61311 580000 Miscellaneous Supplies J 1 2,229.45 1 3129 61104 601300 Ed/Rec Supplies J 1 699.49 1 3136 61102 601300 Ed/Rec Supplies J 1 2,365.01 2 3307 33000 330610 USDA Meals Reimb J 2 29,464.47 2 3115 18000 189900 Misc Revenues J 2 168.50 2 3115 24000 240225 Grant Revenue J 2 9,785.00 2 3133 16000 161232 Revenue-Tuition J 2 2,915.00 2 3133 24000 240240 Revenue-State J 2 281.00 2 3133 51000 510100 Approp-Fund Balance J 2 1,924.51 2 3305 24000 240771 Drivers Ed State Rev J 2 24,447.00 2 3131 51000 510100 Approp-Fund Balance J 2 2,229.45 2 3129 18000 189918 Proceeds-Sales J 2 699.49 2 3136 51000 540000 Approp-Fund Balance J 2 2,365.01 3307 0501 EST REVENUE J 29,464.47 3307 0701 APPROPRIATION J 29,464.47 3115 0501 EST REVENUE J 9,953.50 3115 0701 APPROPRIATION J 9,953.50 3133 0501 EST REVENUE J 5,120.51 3133 0701 APPROPRIATION J 5,120.51 3305 0501 EST REVENUE J 24,447.00 3305 0701 APPROPRIATION J 24,447.00 3131 0501 EST REVENUE J 2,229.45 3131 0701 APPROPRIATION J 2,229.45 3129 0501 EST REVENUE J 699.49 3129 0701 APPROPRIATION J 699.49 3136 0501 EST REVENUE J 2,365.01 3136 0701 APPROPRIATION J 2,365.01 J J TOTAL 148,558.86 74,279.43 74,279.43 PREPARED BY: MELVIN BREEDEN DATE: 08/19/2002 BD. OF SUPV. APPROVAL: ELLA W. CAREY DATE: 09/04/2002 ACCT. APPROVAL: DATE: ENTERED BY: DATE: FMS2 I COUN~ OF AEBEMAREE APP # 2004 08E REVISED 6/84 APPROPRIATION DATE 08/19/2002 BATCH NUMBER EXPLANATION: ADJUSTMENTS TO FY 01/02 APPROPRIATIONS IN THE FUEL FUND, AIMR FUND AND FOOD SERVICES SUB. LEDGER GENERAL LEDGER TYPE FUND DEPT OBJEC3 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODEAMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 1 3910 62341 600800 FUEL& MAINT FUND J 1 100,195.81 2 3910 16000 161271 FUEL CHARGES J 2 100,195.81 3910 0501 EST REVENUE J 100,195.81 3910 0701 APPROPRIATION J 100,195.81 I J I 3002 63115 600200 FOOD SUPPLIES J I 115,121.91 2 3002 16000 161247 FOOD SERVICES J 2 115,121.91 3002 0501 EST REVENUE J 115,121.91 3002 0701 APPROPRIATION J 115,121.91 1 3000 60252 800101 MAC & EQUIP REPLACEMENT J 1 5,000.00 1 3000 60302 119300 SALARIES J 1 32,512.77 1 3000 60302 210000 FICA J 1 2,487.23 2 3000 51000 510100 FUND BALANCE J 2 40,000.00 3000 0501 EST REVENUE J 40,000.00 3000 0701 APPROPRIATION J 40,000.00 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J TOTAL 510,635.44 255,317.72 255,317.72 I PREPARED BY: MELVIN BREEDEN DATE: 08/19/2002 BD. OF SUPV. APPROVAL: ELLA W. CAREY DATE: 09/04/2002 ACCT. APPROVAL: DATE: ENTERED BY: DATE: September 16, 2002 Ms. G. Darlene Shifflett Administrative Assistant Office of Legal Affairs University of Virginia Health Services Foundation 500 Ray Hunt Drive Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Ms. Shifflett: At its meeting on September 4, 2002 the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Executive to sign the attached addendum to the park and ride agreement with the University of Virginia Health Services Foundation facility located at Forest Lakes North. The attached is an original signed agreement and the County of Albemarle has retained an original of same. If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, (Signed) Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC /ewc Attachment cc: Juandiego Wade FIRST ADDENDUM This First Addendum to the Park and Ride Facility Agreement dated October 3, ~2001 by and between THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA and the UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION is effective the Third day~ of October 2002. SECTION 3. B. Term is deleted in its entirety and replaced w/th the follow/ng language: The term of this Agreement shall be one (1) year from the date hereof. Thereafter it shall automatically renew every year. Either party may terminate this Agreement by giv/ng one month's notice in writing to the other party of its intent to terminate. All other terms and conditions of the October 3,2001 Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHF~REOF, the parties hereto have affixed their signatures below. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA By' Rober~ W.~;or, Gr. Date: Septeraher 11, 2002 Approved as to form: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION Marc J. Detl~ Chief Executive Officer Date: '2A ///~ *?-- Date: c:\my docmnents\addenda~Park&RideADD.do¢ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: University of Virginia - Health Services Foundation Facility at Forest Lakes North Park and Ride SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Re-approval of Park and Ride agreement STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Kamptner, Cilimberg, Benish, Wade AGENDA DATE: September 4, 2002 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: Yes ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: INFORMATION: BACKGROUND: On October 3, 2001 the Board of Supervisors approved a park and ride agreement with University of Virginia -Health Services Foundation facility at Forest Lakes North (attached). The site is located at the corner of Timberwood Boulevard and Worth Crossing. DISCUSSION: The terms of the current agreement are for one year, which will expire on October 3, 2002. The addendum to the original agreement will allow for automatic renewal every year (attached). Either party may terminate the agreement by giving one month's notice in writing to the other party of its intent to terminate. All of other conditions will remain the same. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant the County Executive permission to sign the attached addendum. 02.128 COUiNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE.SUMMARY ' S__U_BJEGTIPROPC~,,~A~.REQU EST: Auth~iz~ Me County~ExecutJve t~ 'algn a P. ark and RJd~ A§reemm"it w[~ .University. of V1rg'inia. Heal~h $~rvices Foundaiibn Facility at 'Forest !_~ke~. Nerl:h. AGENDA DATE: Octol~r 3,2.001 ACTION_.: C~3NSENT AG EN.D,~.: ,ACTION: X Me~sr.s.' Tu'q.~er, 'Foley, GJl~lberg, Pettish, Wade A:]-I'ACHME NT.~:. Yes .I~V"IEWED BY:. ~AC KGR© U ND,' · ITEM NIj__M_BER:. .I_N F O P,,_M ATION · INFO'R .M_ _AT[ON: · .in 1998, JAUNT ~qitiated BIG BLUE, a fize~ bus' mute so,Ice SUrcing Roule 29 [}p t~ Gt~c~ Meg'lodist Church.At I~at fJme, JAUNT er~d.s~l~ est~b~hed a park and ride lot at a parking lot on the vacant parcel beside Mc:Ddn,ald~' lhat is'lOcat.ed..at Forest LaKes North.. '~D DI$CU.SStON~' · TS'e vaca.T~;~'~:7,8-m,_,el.,has z]ow bee~ dev~ope~, .and w~ its. ~evelo~ment ~e ~rk ~ ride lot was eliminated, ~e Ua~er~[y ~a Heel~ Se~i~ Eoundation Fac~IJ~ ~ Fa~t Lakes N~h ha~ aged to ~1~ a n~ p~k a~B dale I~' to ~e e~lished ~t ~eir Io~fion, which is lo'ted a~'the ~r of Timbe~ee~ Boule~ a~d.Wo'~h Cm~g,.jus~ 0',~5 mge'~m ~ prio~ toc~on (At~ment A}...There wrll 'b.e n0'add~0na[.cost to the Count, s ' insurance pmm~ ~ ~um (he ~e spaces ~ a pea. and dde.faci[i~.. ~e .Un~er'si~ o[MirgJn~ Health S~s. ' · · Foonda~on and.the Cou~ ~rn~'s '~ce have approved ~e"a~ched park end ride agreemen~ RECOMM EN DATION~ $~ff r'eco~ that ~e Boad of '8~pe~bom g~t the Coun~ Exe~t[ve pe~ission to ~n the'arraYed .ag~ment. '" cc.: Ms. DonnaShaurtesey .. .M~, Helen FOREST [AIq2ES NORTH. PARK AND RIDE LOCATION' r~.CON$1DBRATION of ibc mutual pro,;~e~ sut~d h~cia,'fl~e pe.~cs egre~ ~ foitow~: prOp~y a~'~ p~rk arid ride f~iliry for ~hc b~k ofpetsotas in ¢zt!0ools and commu~. 2, Praises: For tt~ uses d~'bai ia ~cetiJan 4 of mb ~~ ~ ~ ~by ~ ~ as ~ '~es" ~ ~ ~ At~hm~t "A", which i~ e~Ch~ hc~-~d m~e $- ~--~ TI~ ttmn ofthis Algrexancnt sh~l 5 eorm (I) year fi, om thc dat~ h~r~o~ E. iik~. party, howevm", may t~mjn;sCe thi~ Agr~:~t after thre~ months bY'giving or~ mom°n'~ notic~ ~o the othe~ parry of ~ in~ m temaii~e. 4. .' Lbo, O£~th~ Premise.: %e County mey usc th~ promises for a p~k mad car~oo!k~Parki~' l'acilRy~ vehicle ~nd personal ace-~, lind all ~imitm- mud tabled :L .' ,Ac, iig~Th~ Coumy~.petmns ofthepezkandficlc tacilitymaltusc the Ox, nacr's Pohaerty ~urmtmtt{~8 thc premism f~r'vehicl¢ and pg4'estri~a ~ess to aa~ from the park md rid~ faciti~ andfor ~[r~lation, excluding vans, ~d persons, in ca~ls. 6. Mark/ag_of Pr~'n~.~ ~ Publid~_ _. Th: County may-~ si~. p~is~, S~h p~$~t~ eh~ not bc u~~ly ~[d. Shall arrmf~e for regular and/or tiraely mow pl .a~.ing of ~ A~m~t shall b~ ~o~'by ~e Co~ at 1 . }1'01-01' .P12:20 ti. :LizMlitv: Th e ~tmt7 agre~ to mid'th'e ~rner to its ~ liability insm~ez poli~ as · a~ i~titioual ~ Jar ~ Cemty'z 'operation o£a ~ iad.l-ide £ev~iy o~ t~ Owner*z ' owns ~he'~ si'rnple L~res~ ia.and tO Ih~ Premises; tha~ th~ Owaer is duly lO... :Emir~ A_.m'e~m~i'Thiz ~.~ituJ~s th~ e~tir~ a/Ire~ bctwam the t~artivt an~i ~Ul0~rc~ies. viny prior unders~ilin~ oi' ori] or wrk-P.a ag~rn~s b~'wv~n 'the p~i~s ~pming ~e wi~'.m ~hj.~ mature-, Ayyrev~t ~ to ~'m: The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the 4th day of September 2002, adopted the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the streets in Blandemar Farms Estates Subdivision, described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated September 4, 2002, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the roads in Blandemar Farms Estates, as described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated September 4, 2002, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of- way, as described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the recorded plats; and FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded vote: Moved by: Mr. Martin. Seconded by: Mr. Perkins. Yeas: Mr. Martin, Mr. Perkins, Mr. Rooker, Ms. Thomas, Mr. Bowerman and Mr. Dorrier. Nays: None. A Copy Teste: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC Board of County Supervisors The roads described on Additions Form SR-5(A) are: 1) Blandemar Drive (State Route 1041) from the intersection of Route 708 (Taylor's Gap Road) to the intersection of Route 1042 (Waldemar Drive), as shown on plat recorded 03/11/98 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-328, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.27 mile. 2) Blandemar Drive (State Route 1041) from the intersection of Route 1042 (Waldemar Drive) to .61 miles East of Route 1042 (Waldemar Drive), as shown on plat recorded 03/11/98 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-328, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.61 mile. 3) Blandemar Drive (State Route 1041) from .61 miles East of Route 1042 (Waldemar Drive) to the intersection of Route 1043 (Chopin Road), as shown on plat recorded 03/11/98 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-328, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.74 mile. 4) Blandemar Drive (State Route 1041) from the intersection of Route 1043 (Chopin Road) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 03/11/98 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-328, with a 50- foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.54 mile. 5) Chopin Drive (State Route 1043) from the intersection of Route 1041 (Blandemar Drive) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 08/05/98 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1732, pages 692-703, with a 50- foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.53 mile. 6) Waldemar Drive (State Route 1042) from the intersection of Route 1041 (Blandemar Drive) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 03/11/98 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1682, pages 321-328, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.77 mile. Total Mileage - 3.46 mile. In the Coun_ ty~ of Albemarle By resolution o£the governing body adopted September 04, 2002 The following Form SR-SA is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County Official): _~~~ '~ay Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State H s Form SR-5A Secondary Roads Division 5/1/99 Project/Subdivision Blandermar Farms Estates Type of Change: Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested, the right of way for which, including additional easements for drainage as required, is guaranteed: Reason for Ch ange: Addition, New subdivision street Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.%229 Route Number and/or Street Name · Blandermar Drive, State Route Number 1041 · Description: From.' Intersection Rt. 708 Taylor's Gap Road To: Intersection Rt. 1042 Waldemar Drive A distance of: 0.27 miles. Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 3/11/1998, Deed Bood 1682, pg. 321_328, with a width of 50' ~- '-"D~-sc~pti~-n:-- ~ro~t~' '-~nt~rs~ct~n-~f ~t. ~-04-~ v~al~er~r ~riv~ ............................................ To: .61miles East Rt. 1042 Waldemar Drive A distance of: 0.61 miles. Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerk's Office on 3/11/1998. Deed Book 1682, Pg. 321-328, with a width of 50' ~ --D~-sc~/pti~n:- ~rom-': -,6~-M~-es--Ea~t ~. ~4~-W~ld~'m~r ~rive To: Intersection Rt. 1043 Chopin Road A distance of: 0.74 miles. Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerk's Office on 3/11/1998, Deed Book 1682, Pgs 321-328, with a width of 50' Description: From: Intersection Rt. 1043 Chopin Drive To: Cul-de-sac A distance of: 0.54 miles. Right o1: Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 3/11/1998, Deed Book 1682, Pgs 321-328, with a width of 50' · Chopin Drive, State Route Number 1043 Description: From: Intersection Of Rt. 1041 Blandemar Drive To: Cul-de-sac A distance of: 0.53 miles. Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerk's Office on 8/5/1998 Deed Book 1732, Pgs. 692-703, with a width of 50' Page 1 ot'2 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways Form SR-5A Secondary Roads Division 5/1/99 Waldemar Drive, State Route Number 1042 · Description: From: Intersection Rt. 1041 Blandemar Drive To: Cul-de-sac A distance of: 0.77 miles. Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerk's Office on 3/11/1998, Deed Book 1682, Pgs. 321-328, with a width of 50' County of Albemarle, Date of Resolution: September 4, 2002 Page 2 of 2 08-06-02A~:3g RCVD COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Engineering & Public Works 401 Mclntire Road, Room 211 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296 - 5861 Fax (434) 972 - 4035 TRANSMITTAL. TO: _~/l~ ('~. DATE: SUBJECT: The following items are being sent [] Attached [] Via Fax [] Copy of Letter [] Specifications [] Shop Drawings [] Plans [] Contract [] Other [] Plat [] Change Order COPIES DESCRIPTION [] For Approval [] For Your Use Distribution [] As Requested [] Approved as Submitted [] Resubmit . Copies for Approval [] Approved as Noted [] Submit ,, Cop es for [] Returned for Corrections [] Return [] For Review and Comment [] For Bids Due [] Prints Returned after Loan to Us [] Remarks: /' _ - Corrected Prints ,,,20 Copy: Signed: If enclosures are not as noted; kindly notify us at once. W. Tay~ MurCcy, Jr, $or, eC~y of N~t~fl I~.~OLTa~ COMMONWEALTH of VIRQIN[A D£PARTME~T OF ENVIBONM~ QUALITY Val'fey Reglonal Office ~a/~ ~: ~,~ Box 3~, Au~st 8~ 2002 Di~ coum-,,c0fft~.B~mng .. :, : · Chadottesvilt¢, VA 22901. .. :. ..... · ' A,sp~r:.'ELe..Cod~ of¥irginia, Chapter 3.~,.seet~0ni~62..i-44.'ls:4~D., the'Vit~inJa. Depad~cn[of.. . Eavif. o~zmentatQ~mii.ty (DE.Q) is hereby nofifying'Aa~ecnar~¢ County of:f, lbe a~o'Co-~£cccb~d projc~t:.pr0po.s¢6.;?..' .... Tb~t ptopo~ project is located,, along'2,~ute 606 and P, outo 743 .northwost of. Chm'totte~fl[C,,as S~ow~'..'.: · on ific attache~ map,. The latitude and longitude am 3~,08,19 and 78,2.7,1 t, r~speotivcty.' ..... . : ' :, The proje~t'iftvo~ves s~y im'p'boverooa~ t~ th~ aJ_~o.rt faciiity and ~wa¥. :TM.~ project.propos~ to ;'......:. Jmp~t 3,42 an-cs ofwedmzda. The~. frnpaets ~i]l b~ mitiga~e,d. :... '. S~ould yoa have ~y q~e~tions, oort~oi'nir~ this project, please ¢oata~t mc at (:~40) ~74¢.780'2 oj:..',a....:- ':.' · Atta~bmcnt: U$@S Topographic Map .,. :;.. David Hin;hnaala,,AJbema~lo Co.u_nty :. ;.. VW-P permit [~ lc . COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE 2001 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT Prepared by County of Albemarle Department of Planning and Community Development Office of Geographic Data Services 401 IVlcTntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902 (434) 296-5823 STATISTICAL ABSTRACT Residential Building Perm/ts Residential building permits issued in 2001 totaled 875 dwelling units. This number is on the higher end of the level of building activity observed since 1990. This is the highest level of activity since 1997, when 905 dwelling units were created. Of the 875 new housing starts in 2001, 622 dwelling units (71%) were located in Designated Development Areas and 253 dwelling units (29%) were located in the Rural Areas. · Residential building permits issued in 2001 were composed of the following types of dwelling units: - 50 % conventional single-family detached; - 6 % single-family attached; - 5 % single-family townhouse; - 34 % multi-family units; - 4 % mobile homes located throughout the County; and - 1% accessory apartments. Of the 437 single-family detached units created from new building permits issued, 205 (47%) were located in the Development Areas and 232 (53%) were located in the Rural Areas. · Mobile homes accounted for 5 ½ % (14 total) of all building permits issued for dwelling units in the Rural Areas - nearly identical to the 6% experienced in 2000. · Accessory apartments accounted for just over 1% (11 total) of units created from building permits issued in 2001. Residential Subdivisions · 112 subdivision plats were signed in 2001 creating 498 new lots. · Of the 498 new lots created, 362 (73%) were located in the Development Areas and 136 (27%) were located in the Rural Areas. · 44 (32%) of new Rural Area lots were development right lots of less than 21 acres. The average lot size of the 498 new lots created in 2001 decreased to 9.09 acres from 13.04 acres in 2000. In 2001, the average new lot size in the Designated Development Areas (362 lots) decreased to 0.98 acres, but the average new lot size in the Rural Areas (136 lots) increased to 30.69 acres. Site Development Plans · Seven major residential site development plans were signed in 2001, creating 891 new units. 12 major non-residential site development plans were signed in 2001. These plans represented 582,429 square feet of commercial/retail services space, 191,540 square feet of industrial space, 47,128 square feet of office space, and 719,222 square feet of public/institutional space. land Use Taxation and Agricultural/Forestal Districts Landowners have enrolled 21% of the Designated Development Areas, and 70% of the Rural Areas in the land use taxation program as of December 31, 2001. The total area in the land use taxation program comprises approximately 68% of Albemarle County. As of December 31st, 2001, the land area voluntarily enrolled by rural landowners in agricultural and forestal districts represented approximately 14% of the acreage in Albemarle County's Rural Areas. Zoning A total of 110.05 acres were rezoned in 2001. The developments of Western Ridge (Phase 5C) and Avemore, accounted for nearly 54 acres of the total acreage rezoned in the County. TARLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 II. RESIDENTIAL ACTIVITY ............................................................................................................... 2 Ao 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. B. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. C. BUILDING PERMIT A CTIVI TY. ......................................................................................................... 2 OVERVmW ........................................................................................................................................ 2 BUILDiNG PERMITS BY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AREA ....................................................................... 2 BUILDiNG PERMITS BY DWELLING UNIT TYPE .................................................................................. 5 BUILDING PERMITS BY MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ................................................................................ 5 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ACTIVITY COMPARISON .............................................................................. 5 SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY ................................................................................................................. 10 OVERVmW ...................................................................................................................................... 10 2~51ALYSIS OF SIGNED PLATS ........................................................................................................... 10 HISTORIC COMPARISON OF SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY - SIGNED PLATS ............................................... 13 SIGNED PLATS - PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE ROADS .................................................................................. 13 RURAL PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................... 17 SITE PLAN A CTIVITY ....................................................................................................................... 20 III. INVENTORY OF LAND USE ........................................................................................................ 23 IV. ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MODIFICATIONS ................................................. 32 Ao 2001 REZONING ACTIVITY. ............................................................................................................. 32 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MODIFICATIONS IN 2001 ................................................................... 34 V. APPENDIX ....................................................................................................................................... 36 iii LIST 0 F TABLES Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table 2-1: Comprehensive Plan Area - Actual Dwellings Summary, 1997-2001 ................................................ 3 2-2: Dwelling Units by Comprehensive Plan Area by Building Permits Issued in 2001 ............................ 4 2-3: Number of Dwelling Units by Magisterial District by Building Permits Issued in 2001 ..................... 7 2-4: Building Permit Activity Comparison, 1993-2001 ............................................................................ 8 2-5: Total Number of New Dwelling Units from Building Permits Issued, 1982-2001 .............................. 9 2-6: Residential Subdivision Activity in 2001 - Signed Plats ................................................................. 11 2-7: Distribution by Size (Acreage) Based on Signed Plats Located in the Rural Areas, 1999-2001 ........ 12 2-8: Changes in Subdivision Activity, 1990-2001 - Signed Plats ............................................................ 14 2-9: Rural Area Average Lot Size, 1998-2001 (Development Right Lots) .............................................. 15 2-10:2001 New Lots - Based on Signed Plats ....................................................................................... 16 2-11: Rural Preservation Developments, 1991-2001 .............................................................................. 18 2-12: Major Residential Site Plans Approved in 2001 ............................................................................ 20 2-13: Major Non-residential Site Plans Approved in 2001 ..................................................................... 21 3-1: Residential Land Use Summary, 2001 ........................................................................................... 23 3-2: Commercial and Industrial Land Use Summary, 2001 .................................................................... 24 3-3: Acreage in Land Use Taxation by Year and Land Use Type, 1982-2001 ......................................... 25 3-4: Estimate of Distribution of County Land Under Land Use, 2001 .................................................... 26 3-5: Agricultural/Forestal Districts ........................................................................................................ 27 4-1: Approved Zoning Map Amendments, 2001 .................................................................................... 31 iv I. INTRODUCTION The Development Activity Report is an annual review of the residential, commercial, and industrial development applications approved by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals, Department of Planning and Community Development, and Building Codes and Zoning Services. This review in no way represents actual development in the County; it simply reflects serious development interests. Throughout the year, numerous actions are taken regarding building permits, subdivision plats, site development plans, and changes to zoning regulations. This report tracks these actions and analyzes where trends of two or more years are occurring. The location of new residential and commercial interest is not only important to planners, but is also useful information for those involved in rural preservation, commercial development, or marketing activities. In June of 1996, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors adopted the 1996-2016 Land Use Plan. This Land Use Plan is similar in many ways to the previous Plan. However, the Villages of Earlysville and North Garden were eliminated in the Plan as Designated Development Areas. Development information for these eliminated areas has been incorporated in information about Rural Areas 1 and 3, respectively. It is important to point out that an amendment to the Plan, approved in December of 1989, created the Village of Rivanna Development Area. In this report, some of the data previously attributed to Rural Area 4 is now shown as belonging to the Rivanna Village. Additions have also been made to the Development Areas of Piney Mountain and Hollymead. Piney Mountain was upgraded from a Village designation to a Community. It is also important to note that the Community of Scottsville Development Area was eliminated with the adoption of the 1996-2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan since a significant portion of the Area was incorporated into the Town of Scottsville by boundary adjustment on January 1, 1994. This report is divided into three major sections. The first section addresses residential development by analyzing where building permit, subdivision, and site plan activity has occurred. The next section describes inventories of residential, commercial, and industrial zoned land along with the distribution of County land in preferential land use taxation. The third section presents zoning map amendments and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. As in past reports, one purpose of the Development Activity Report is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, adopted December 10, 1980. An objective of the Zoning Ordinance is to encourage development in the Designated Development Areas (these specific Development Areas are described in detail in the Comprehensive Plan). While the Comprehensive Plan outlines goals and objectives for effectively managing Albemarle County's growth, the Zoning Ordinance provides the legal structure by which the goals and objectives are accomplished. For the purposes of this report, 2001 development activity comparisons will be made to the 1996-2016 Land Use Plan. II. RESIDENTIAL ACTIVITY A. BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY 1. Overview The annual number of new residential dwelling units is an important indicator of growth in a locality. For this report, the number of building permits issued for new residential structures is a measure of new dwelling units to be built in Albemarle County. Though the total level of activity from one year to the next is ascertained from building permit volumes, the distribution of new housing by location and by type can also be analyzed from information provided on a permit. The location and type of dwelling relative to existing utilities, public facilities, and infrastructure provides direction for long-term planning efforts. 2. Building Permits by Comprehensive Plan Area In 2001, the number of new dwelling units from building permits totaled 875 (see Table 2-1). This total represents an increase of 225 dwelling units from the 2000 total of 650. The average number of dwelling units produced from new building permits has been roughly 805 units for the past nine years. Designated Development Areas (Urban Areas, Communities, and Villages) accounted for 71% (622 units) of all new dwelling units in 2001. The Urban Areas, consisting of Neighborhoods 1-7, accounted for 47% (414 units) of the total 875 new dwelling units in 2001, nearly thirty percent higher than last year. Of the 414 new units located in the Urban Area, 276 were located in Urban Neighborhood 3 (see Table 2-2). This constituted the highest volume of new building activity in the Designated Development Areas and occurred mainly due to the construction of the Carriage Hill apartments. The amount of activity in the Communities increased in 2001. The Communities represented 186 units or 21% of the total number of new units in the County. The Community of Hollymead once again showed a significant amount of new dwelling unit building activity. In 2001, Hollymead accounted for 107 (12%) of the County's total new dwelling units. The adoption of the revised Land Use Plan component of the Comprehensive Plan in June 1996 eliminated two Village designations leaving only one Village in the Plan (Rivanna). The number of dwelling units from building permits in the Village of Rivanna, mainly due to the continued development of the Glenmore subdivision, accounted for 22 units or 3% of the total new dwelling units permitted. In the Rural Areas, the percentage of dwelling units created from new building permits issued accounted for 29% (253 units) of all new dwelling units created within the County. An increase in the total number of dwelling units created from new building permits issued in the County was experienced in 2001, and building activity was focused in the Designated Development Areas. 2 TABLE 2-1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AREA - ACTUAL DWELLINGS SUMMARY 1997-2001 ACTUAL DWELLINGS AND DISTRIBUTION (from Building Reports) COMP PLAN AREA 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Urban Areas 376 42% 367 42% 218 28% 189 29% 414 47% Communities 195 22% 158 18% 167 22% 130 20% 186 21% Villages 62 7% 63 7% 49 6% 50 8% 22 3% Rural Areas 272 30% 286 33% 336 44% 281 43% 253 29% TOTAL 905 100% 874 100% 770 100% 650 100% 875 100% TABLE 2-2 DWELLING UNITS BY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AREA BY BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN 2001 %OF COMP PLAN AREA SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MH AA TOTAL UNITS TOTAL URBAN RURAL UNITS Urban Neighborhood 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Urban Neighborhood 2 41 8 5 0 0 0 1 55 6.3% Urban Neighborhood 3 11 0 0 0 265 0 0 276 31.5% Urban Neighborhood 4 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 1.1% Urban Neighborhood 5 26 14 0 0 30 0 0 70 8.0% Urban Neighborhood 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.3% Urban Neighborhood 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Crozet Community 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 7.3% Hollymead Community 31 30 25 0 0 19 2 107 12.2% Piney Mountain Community 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 15 1.7% Rivanna Village 21 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 2.5% DEVELOPMENT AREA SUBTOTAL 205 54 45 0 295 19 4 622 71.1% Rural Area 1 56 0 0 0 0 3 3 62 7.1% Rural Area 2 57 0 0 0 0 0 2 59 6.7% Rural Area 3 77 0 0 0 0 2 1 80 9.1% Rural Area 4 42 0 0 0 0 9 1 52 5.9% RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 232 0 0 0 0 14 7 253 28.9% TOTAL 437 54 45 0 295 33 11 875 100.0% KEY TO TYPES OF HOUSING: SF- Single-Family (includes Modular) DUP- Duplex AA-Accessory Apartment SFA- Single-Family Attached MF- Multi-Family SF/TH- Single-Family Townhouse MH- Mobile Home 4 3. Building Permits by Dwelling Unit Type As in previous years, the highest percentage of 2001 residential building permit activity occurred in the category of single-family detached homes, including modular homes (see Table 2-2). In 2001, 50% (437 units) of all building permits issued for dwelling units were for single-family homes. Single- family detached homes, as a percentage of total dwelling units constructed in 2001, decreased by 34% from the 2000 figure. In the Rural Areas, 92% of all dwelling units were single-family detached homes. In the Designated Development Areas, 33% of all dwelling units were single-family detached homes. The unusually Iow percentage of single-family detached homes was due more to an increase in the construction of other dwellings units, in the Development Areas, than to a large drop off in single-family detached home construction. The total number of single-family attached dwelling units constructed decreased from 65 units in 2000 to 54 units in 2001. The Community of Hollymead accounted for 55% of the 54 new single- family attached units. Of all building permits issued for new dwelling units in Albemarle County, 6% were for single-family attached units. The total number of single-family townhouses constructed increased to 45 units in 2001 from 6 units in 2000. Of all building permits issued for dwelling units in Albemarle County, 5% were for single- family townhouses. Unlike 1999 and 2000, there were numerous multi-family permits issued in 2001. The renewed activity in multi-family permits yielded 295 multi-family units. Building permits were issued in 1998 for 184 multi-family dwelling units. In 1997, building permits were issued for 208 units; in 1996, building permits were issued for 226 units; 4. Building Permits by Magisterial District The magisterial district boundaries used in this report are those which were revised on June 13, 2001, as a result of the release of the Census Bureau population figures for Albemarle County. Of the six magisterial districts, the Rivanna district recorded the highest level of residential building activity in 2001 with 518 permits issued for new dwelling units, accounting for 59% of all new dwelling units (see Table 2-3). The White Hall district recorded the second highest level of residential building activity in 2001 with 142 permits issued for new dwelling units, accounting for 16% of all new dwelling units. The Samuel Miller district closely followed this with 101 permits issued for new dwelling units, representing 12% of the new dwellings units in the County. The Jack Jouett district had the lowest level of residential building permits with 1% (11 units) of the total number of new dwelling units in Albemarle County in 2001. 5. Residential Building Activity Comparison The average number of total dwelling units for which building permits were issued between 1993 and 2001 was 805 units (see Table 2-4). The 2001 total of 875 units represents a slightly above average year for building activity as compared to the nine-year average. In the Urban Area (Neighborhoods 1-7), in 2001, Neighborhood 3 accounts for the largest amount of building activity. Among the Communities, the Community of Hollymead continues to account for the majority of the residential building activity. In the last nine years, Urban Neighborhood 2 and the Community of Hollymead has displayed the most growth, as both have seen roughly 1000 new dwellings units each. Together they comprise 27% of the growth experienced in the County from new dwelling units yielded from building permits issued. The total number of permits issued for new residential dwelling units located in the Rural Areas of the County decreased from 281 in 2000 to 253 in 2001. The disparity between 2000 and 2001 continues the current trend, which shows a decline in the number of new dwelling units constructed in the Rural Areas. The current trend has been a decline from a peak of 336 new units in 1999. On average, the Rural Areas have witnessed 269 new units annually for the last nine years. Overall, the 875 building permits issued in 2001 for residential dwelling units represents an average year for housing permit activity over the last twenty years since, as shown on Table 2-5, from 1982 to 2001 an average of 812 permits were issued annually. TABLE 2-3 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS BY MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (as revised in May 200:].) BY BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN 2001 MAGISTERIAL SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MH AA TOTAL %OFTOTAL DISTRICTS UNITS UNITS Rio 17 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 2% Jack Jouett 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 1% Rivanna 148 38 45 0 265 19 3 518 59% Samuel Miller 83 14 0 0 0 2 2 101 12% Scottsville 43 2 0 0 30 9 1 85 10% White Hall 137 0 0 0 0 3 2 142 16% TOTAL 437 54 45 0 295 33 11 875 100% KEY TO TYPES OF HOUSING: SF- Single-Family (includes Modular) DUP-Duplex AA- Accessory Apts. SFA-Single-Family Attached MF-Multi-Family SF/TH-Single-Family Townhouse MH-Mobile Home TABLE 2-4 BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY COMPARISON 1993-2001 COMP PLAN AREA 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 TOTAL % OF #UNITS #UNITS #UNITS #UNITS #UNITS #UNITS #UNITS #UNITS #UNITS #UNITS TOTAL Urban Neighborhood i 60 0 0 0 48 23 i 0 0 132 2% Urban Neighborhood 2 85 210 97 99 234 69 86 74 55 1,009 14% Urban Neighborhood 3 i 4 0 20 5 177 41 22 276 546 8% Urban Neighborhood 4 85 219 48 264 48 48 44 42 10 808 11% Urban Neighborhood 5 20 14 11 15 36 36 44 46 70 292 4% Urban Neighborhood 6 2 2 2 3 5 14 2 4 3 37 1% Urban Neighborhood 7 12 i 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 14 0% URBAN AREAS SUBTOTAL 265 450 158 401 376 367 218 189 414 2,838 39% Crozet Community 72 40 35 37 59 48 56 53 64 464 6% Hollymead Community 122 123 94 91 134 96 95 75 107 937 13% Piney Mountain Community i 10 8 12 2 14 16 2 15 80 1% COMMUNITIES SUBTOTAL 195 173 137 140 195 158 167 130 186 1,481 20% Rivanna Village 77 77 48 63 62 63 49 50 22 511 7% VILLAGE SUBTOTAL 77 77 48 63 62 63 49 50 22 511 7% DEVELOPMENT AREA TOTAL 1537 1700 1343 1604 1633 1588 1434 1369 1622 14,830 167% Rural Area i 63 65 68 57 77 79 67 67 62 605 8% Rural Area 2 52 51 39 45 46 53 89 57 59 491 7% Rural Area 3 80 68 69 75 66 81 108 87 80 714 10% Rural Area 4 73 55 77 54 83 73 72 70 52 609 8% RURAL AREA TOTAL I=~ I=~ I=~ I=~ I=~= I=~ I~ I=~ I=~ I~,~1 TOTAL 805 939 596 835 905 874 770 650 875 7,249 100% TABLE 2-5 TOTAL NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS FROM BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED 1982-2001 YEAR NUMBER OF # CHANGE FROM DWELLING UNITS PREVIOUS YEAR 1982 482 1983 1,063 581 1984 725 -338 1985 714 -11 1986 737 23 1987 654 -83 1988 673 19 1989 1,309 636 1990 804 -505 1991 614 -190 1992 866 252 1993 805 -61 1994 939 134 1995 596 -343 1996 835 239 1997 905 70 1998 874 -31 1999 770 -104 2000 650 -120 2001 875 105 TOTAL 15,890 Average 1982-1991: 777.5 Dwelling Units/Year Average 1992-2001: 811.5 Dwelling Units/Year Average 1982-2001: 794.5 Dwelling Units/Year B. SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY 1. Overview As the County of Albemarle continues to experience growth, there will be continued residential development in the area. The best mechanism for tracking developments is through the analysis of subdivision activity, given that a precursor to a residential development is most commonly the subdividing of land into multiple lots for individual dwelling unit construction. For the purposes of this report, the definition of a subdivision is limited to the division of a parcel of land, including re-divisions, which results in at least one (1) new residential building lot. The creation of condominium lots is separated from that of other residential lots in the analysis of this report. Condominium lots do not include acreage as part of the individual lot. It would be misleading therefore to include them in calculations such as average lot size. This section of the 2001 Development Activity Report examines the characteristics of new residential building lots through subdivision activity during the year and includes data for plats signed for recordation. Not all subdivision plats approved by the Planning Department are subsequently recorded in the Courts, therefore, adding together all current and historical new lots reported in this, and prior, Development Activity Reports, would result in an over-estimation or "double counting" of the actual number of lots in the County. Also, properties may be subject to repeated subdivision activity and therefore current and historical acreage subdivided cannot be added, since this would result in over-estimation of total acreage divided in the County. 2. Analysis of Signed Plats In 2001, 112 residential subdivision plats were signed and 498 new lots were created (see Table 2- 6). The Designated Development Areas accounted for 29% of the signed plats, 73% of the new residential building lots created, and 8% of the total acres subdivided in 2001. Of the major subdivisions in the Designated Development Areas, Redfields (Phase 4A) located in Urban Neighborhood 5, contributed the most significant number of new lots (62 lots). The Rural Areas accounted for 71% of the total number of residential subdivision plats signed, 27% of the new lots created, and 92% percent of the total acreage subdivided in 2001 (see Table 2-6). The 80 new subdivisions in the Rural Areas in 2001 are consistent with the Iow level of subdivision activity that the County experienced in 2000. The number of new subdivisions in the Rural Areas has generally experienced a slow decline since a peak of 176 in 1993. However, the total acreage subdivided in the Rural Areas has fluctuated from as much as 7,395 in 2000 to as Iow as 1,723 in 1996. The distribution of new Rural Area lots by size is shown in Table 2-7. Thirty-three percent of new lots created were less than 21 acres in size. Unusual was the fact that the bulk of the new lots in the Rural Areas were at least 21 acres. The percentage of new lots created in 2001 in excess of 21 acres (68%) showed a decided increase from those created in 2000 (21%). ]0 TABLE 2-6 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY IN 2001 - SIGNED PLATS COMP PLAN AREA SUBDIVISIONS NEW LOTS TOTAL ACREAGE # % # % Acres % Urban Neighborhood I 2 1.8% 4 0.8% 4.69 0.10% Urban Neighborhood 2 3 2.7% 102 20.5% 105.80 2.34% Urban Neighborhood 3 I 0.9% 2 0.4% 41.21 0.91% Urban Neighborhood 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.00 0.00% Urban Neighborhood 5 2 1.8% 63 12.7% 28.29 0.62% Urban Neighborhood 6 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.00 0.00% Urban Neighborhood 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.00 0.00% URBAN AREAS SUBTOTAL 8 7.1% 171 34.3% 179.98 3.97% Crozet Community 3 2.7% 30 6.0% 41.36 0.91% HollymeadCommunity 19 17.0% 145 29.1% 126.90 2.80% Piney Mountain Community I 0.9% 15 3.0% 0.86 0.02% COMMUNITIES SUBTOTAL 23 20.5% 190 38.2% 169.12 3.73% Rivanna Village I 0.9% I 0.2% 5.60 0.12% VILLAGE SUBTOTAL I 0.9% I 0.2% 5.60 0.12% DEVELOPMENT AREAS TOTAL 32 28.6% 362 72.7% 354.69 7.83% Rural Area I 25 22.3% 38 7.6% 1,056.3 23.33% 9 Rural Area2 12 10.7% 20 4.0% 311.99 6.89% Rural Area3 22 19.6% 36 7.2% 1,356.7 29.96% 4 Rural Area 4 21 18.8% 42 8.4% 1,449.0 32.00% 0 RURAL AREAS TOTAL 80 71.4% 136 27.3% 4,174.1 92.17% 2 TOTAL 112 100.0% 498 100.0% 4,528.8 100.00% 2 ]] TABLE 2-7 3.999-2003. NEW LOTS DISTRIBUTED BY SIZE (ACREAGE) BASED ON SIGNED PLATS LOCATED IN THE RURAL AREAS 1999 2000 2001 RANGE IN ACRES NEW LOTS %OFTOTAL NEW LOTS %OFTOTAL NEW LOTS %OFTOTAL CREATED RURAL LOTS CREATED RURAL LOTS CREATED RURAL LOTS Under 2.0 13 9% 0 0% I 1% 2.0 to 4.99 15 10% 44 18% 13 10% 5.0 to 9.99 38 26% 28 11% 14 10% 10.0 to 20.99 20 14% 124 50% 16 12% 21.0 and Over 62 42% 51 21% 92 68% TOTAL 148 100% 247 100% 247 100% ]2 3. Historic Comparison of Subdivision Activity - Signed Plats The comparison of subdivision activity in 2001 to that of previous years is a useful tool for identifying growth patterns (see Table 2-8). In 2001, there was an increase in the total number of new residential subdivision plats signed from 97 in 2000 to 112 (see Table 2-8). But there was a decrease in the total number of new residential building lots created through subdivision activity, from 567 new lots in 2000, to 498 lots in 2001. The Designated Development Areas accounted for 362 of the 498 new lots in 2001, which is only a slight increase over the number of new lots in 2000. These 362 lots account for 73% of total lots, a major increase from 56% in 2000. The total acreage subdivided in the Development Areas was nearly identical to the acreage subdivided in 2000. With the number of new lots and total acreage subdivided remaining nearly static, the average lot size has also experienced only a minimal decrease to .98 acres. This remained consistent (within a ½ acre) of the average for the last eleven years. Only in 1999, which experienced an anomaly with an average size of 3.14 acres, has the lot size strayed from this average. Unlike in previous years, the location of the new lots was nearly equal between the Communities (190 lots) and the Urban Neighborhoods (171 lots). The Village of Rivanna only reported 1 new lot. In the Rural Areas, the 136 new lots created in 2001 represented a decrease of 45% from the 2000 total of 247 new lots. The 136 new lots created by signed plats in 2001 are below the established trend observed in previous years in the Rural Areas. From 1987 to 1998, many of the Rural Area subdivisions created only one (1) or two (2) new lots each, and the average lot size tended to be larger, ranging from 7 to nearly 15 acres (see Table 2-8). In the years prior to 1987, the number of new lots created per subdivision was relatively high (3 to 5 lots per subdivision), and the resulting average lot size tended to be smaller. In 1999, the average lot size in the Rural Areas reached a high of 43 acres. The average lot size in the Rural Areas for 2001 was 30.69 acres. The new average lot sizes for new Rural Area lots created with development rights (which exclude lots greater than or equal to 21 acres), from 1998 to 2001 appear in Table 2-9. Average lot sizes of those lots created with development rights in the Rural Areas have increased in Rural Areas 2, 3, and 4. Meanwhile, lot sizes have decreased in Rural Area 1. 4. Signed Plats - Public vs. Private Roads Effective January 1, 1984, the provisions in the Subdivision Ordinance regarding private roads were substantially amended to state that private roads would be the exception to public road construction in subdivision developments. Prior to this amendment, the number of subdivisions on private roads was higher than the number with public roads. After the amendment was enacted, the distribution of subdivisions on public roads versus private roads generally began to favor public road development. In 2001, public road access for new lots far exceeded private road access with 62% of all new lots utilizing public roads while 13% used private roads. Ten percent of new lots created in 2001 utilized both public and private roads, while 15% of new lots were created with no roads. (see Table 2-10). ]3 TABLE 2-8 CHANGES IN SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY 1990-2001 SIGNED PLATS COMP PLAN AREA 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 URBAN AREA Subdivisions 17 26 26 32 28 20 21 15 14 7 10 8 New Lots 162 190 234 191 171 162 179 129 55 75 70 171 Acreage 348.00 48.00 160.00 130.00 100.76 218.00 91.95 297.24 222.24 176.72 133.19 179.98 ~ Average Lot Size 2.15 0.25 0.68 0.68 0.59 1.35 0.51 2.30 4.04 2.36 1.90 1.0~ COMMUNITIES Subdivisions 3 12 12 18 12 14 11 15 13 18 7 23. New Lots 14 125 127 272 135 208 40 143 138 76 178 19C Acreage 6.00 118.00 8200 75.00 50.00 81.00 20.61 90.83 48.57 195.21 157.62 169.12 ~ Average Lot Size 0.43 0.94 0.65 0.28 0.37 0.39 0.52 0.64 0.35 2.57 0.89 0.8c. VILLAGES Subdivisions 2 4 5 3 2 8 3 3 I 2 I 1 New Lots 27 16 314 20 2 73 82 42 51 2 72 1 Acreage 14.00 11.00 16900 900 43.00 46.00 64.00 13.51 22.13 11904 66.47 5.6C ~ Average Lot Size 0.52 0.69 0.54 0.45 21.50 0.63 0.78 0.32 0.43 59.52 0.92 5.6C TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS Subdivisions 22 42 43 53 42 42 35 33 28 27 18 32 New Lots 203 331 675 483 308 443 301 314 244 153 320 362 Acreage 368.00 177.00 411.00 214.00 193.76 345.00 176.56 401.58 292.94 490.96 357.27 354.7C ~ Average Lot Size 1.81 0.53 0.61 0.44 0.63 0.78 0.59 1.28 1.20 3.21 1.12 0.98 RURAL AREA I Subdivisions 31 18 20 33 30 26 18 22 26 18 25 2E New Lots 82 42 27 70 87 37 28 26 38 25 71 38 1702.6 1056.3 Acreage 584.00 316.00 150.00 930.00 315.00 708.00 27200 210.09 399.24 912.40 7 c ~ Average Lot Size 7.12 7.52 5.56 13.29 3.62 19.14 9.71 8.08 10.51 36.50 23.98 27.8C RURAL AREA 2 Subdivisions 27 25 25 21 21 13 18 17 20 20 17 12 New Lots 48 30 38 36 36 20 33 75 27 38 70 2C 2008.3 Acreage 67200 510.00 280.00 428.00 428.00 294.00 416.00 502.67 245.48 789.87 8 311.9c- ~ Average Lot Size 14.00 17.00 7.37 11.89 11.89 14.70 12.61 6.70 9.09 20.79 28.69 15.6C RURAL AREA 3 Subdivisions 37 34 44 34 33 28 27 33 29 23 14 22 New Lots 65 68 76 92 37 69 42 52 100 42 26 36 1499.6 1606.0 1356.7 Acreage 733.00 550.00 873.00 460.00 794.00 73200 313.00 461.89 607.16 3 2 4 ~ Average Lot Size 11.28 8.09 11.49 5.00 21.46 10.61 7.45 8.88 15.00 38.24 23.35 37.6c. RURAL AREA 4 Subdivisions 33 37 37 35 11 33 29 28 23 34 23 21 New Lots 50 48 50 75 19 56 45 43 26 43 80 42 1387.0 3179.3 2719.7 1449.C Acreage 880.00 848.00 593.00 254.00 910.00 546.00 366.72 276.44 0 5 0 C ~ Average Lot Size 17.60 17.67 11.86 18.49 13.37 16.25 12.13 8.53 10.63 73.94 34.00 34.5C TOTAL RURAL AREAS Subdivisions 128 114 126 123 95 100 92 100 98 95 79 8C New Lots 245 188 191 273 179 182 148 196 191 148 247 136 28690 2224.0 1896.0 3205.0 1791.0 2644.0 1547.0 1541.3 2420.7 6487.6 7037.9 4172.1 Acreage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 9 5 2 2 ~ Average Lot Size 11.71 11.83 9.93 11.74 10.01 14.53 10.45 7.86 12.67 43.84 28.49 30.6c. GRAND TOTAL Subdivisions 150 156 169 176 137 142 127 133 126 122 97 112 New Lots 448 519 866 756 487 625 449 510 435 301 567 498 3237.0 2401.0 2307.0 34190 1985.0 29890 1723.5 1942.9 2713.7 6978.6 7395.2 4528.8 Acreage 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 3 I 0 2 ]4 Average Lot Size 7.23 4.63 2.66 4.52 4.08 4.78 3.84 3.81 6.24 23.18 13.04 9.09 * Average Lot Size is not an indication of density. For each subdivision approved by the Planning Department, "Average Lot Size" was determined by summing open space acres and acreage in lots and dividing by the total number of new lots thereby resulting in a higher density than may actually exist. TABLE 2-9 RURAL AREA AVERAGE LOT SIZE, 1998-2001~ (Development Right Lots) COMPREHENSIVE 1998 1999 2000 2001 FROM '00- '01 AREA Rural Area I 5.49 ac. 5.00 ac. 7.29 ac. 6.74 ac. -0.55 ac. Rural Area 2 5.27 ac. 3.43 ac. 5.88 ac. 6.50 ac. 0.62 ac. Rural Area 3 8.84 ac. 10.64 ac. 10.12 ac. 11.84 ac. 1.71 ac. Rural Area 4 4.29 ac. 6.58 ac. 7.80 ac. 8.33 ac. 0.53 ac. Average Lot Size is not an indication of density. For each subdivision approved by the Planning Department, "Average Lot Size" was determined by summing open space acres and acreage in lots and dividing by the total number of new lots thereby resulting in a higher density than may actually exist. (Example: Subdivision X Acreage = 20 open space acres + 50 acres in lots; "Average Lot Size" = 70 acres/ total number of lots) TABLE 2-10 2001 NEW LOTS BASED ON SIGNED PLATS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROADS #OF CLASSIFICATION OF ROADS NEW % LOTS Public Roads 311 62.45 Private Roads 66 13.25 Public / Private Roads 49 9.84 No Roads 72 14.46 TOTAL 498 100.00 ]6 5. Rural Preservation Development The Rural Preservation Development was created as an alternative to the conventional development subdivision provisions set forth in Section 10 (Rural Areas District) of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. The Rural Preservation Development option, added to the Zoning Ordinance in November 1989, is intended to encourage more effective land usage in terms of the goals and objectives for the Rural Areas as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, in addition to the standard subdivision provisions, which appear in the Zoning Ordinance, applications for Rural Preservation Developments are reviewed for the preservation of agricultural and forestal lands and activities; water supply protection; and/or conservation of natural, scenic, or historic resources. However, there were no rural preservation developments approved in 2001. (see Table 2-11 ). ]7 TABLE 2-11 RURAL PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENTS, 1991-2001 COMP PLAN AREA 1991 1992 1993 199 199 199 1997 199 1999 200 200 TOTAL 4 5 6 8 0 1 RURAL AREA 1 Total Acreage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Number of Dev. Lots 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1.11) Ave. Acreage of Dev. Lots 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RPTAcreage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 Common Open Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acreage RURAL AREA 2 132.9 Total Acreage 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 132.90 Number of Dev. Lots 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 Ave. Acreage of Dev. Lots 0.00 5.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RPT Acreage 0.00 57.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.70 Common Open Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acreage RURAL AREA 3 521.9 198.4 Total Acreage 0.00 84.13 I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 804.49 Number of Dev. Lots 0.00 7.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 0.00 63.00 Ave. Acreage of Dev. Lots 0.00 5.26 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.30 0.00 0.00 385.4 113.9 RPT Acreage 0.00 47.33 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.00 0.00 546.68 Common Open Space 0.00 0.00 19.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.20 Acreage RURAL AREA 4 Total Acreage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Number of Dev. Lots 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ave. Acreage of Dev. Lots 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RPT Acreage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Common Open Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acreage TOTAL 217.0 521.9 198.4 Total Acreage 0.00 3 I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 937.39 Number of Dev. Lots 0.00 20.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 0.00 74.89 1.11 Ave. Acreage of Dev. Lots 0.00 10.85 13.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 0.00 0.00 105.0 385.4 113.9 RPTAcreage 0.00 3 3 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 2 0.00 0.00 605.49 Common Open Space 0.00 0.00 19.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.20 Acreage ]$ C. SITE PLAN ACTIVITY The approval of site development plans is another measure of growth in Albemarle County. This section of the Development Activity Report examines the site development plans that were signed in 2001. In 2001, seven major residential site development plans totaling 891 new dwelling units, were signed (see Table 2-12). The 891 units approved by site development plans in 2001, presents a major increase over the 96 new units approved in 1999 and the 90 new units approved in 2000. Major non-residential site development plans signed in 2001 appear in Table 2-13. Major site development plans included in the table, with the exception of public/institutional plans, exceed 15,000 sq. ft. A total of 12 major non-residential site development plans were signed creating 1,540,319 square feet of commercial/retail, industrial, or public/institutional construction. Of the total square footage approved, 582,429 square feet was for commercial/retail services (as compared to 116,823 square feet approved in 2000); 191,540 square feet for industrial (as compared to 0 square feet in 2000); 47,128 square feet for office services (as compared to 259,900 square feet approved in 2000); and 719,222 square feet for public/institutional services (as compared to 171,371 square feet approved in 2000). Ten of the twelve development plans approved in 2001 were located within the Designated Development Areas. 2O TABLE 2-12 MAJOR RESIDENTIAL SITE PLANS APPROVED IN 2001 PROJECT NAME COMP PLAN AREA TYPE OF DWELLINGS NUMBER OF DWELLINGS Hollymead Townhouses Hollymead single-family 64 Community townhouse Springridge Project 2.1 Hollymead multi-family residence 32 Community Townwood Mobile Home Park Neighborhood I manufactured home 101 Carriage Hill Apartments Phase Neighborhood 3 multi-family residence 140 2 Pantops Place Neighborhood 3 multi-family residence 166 Riverbend Garden Apartments Neighborhood 3 multi-family residence 124 Stone Creek Village (Old Neighborhood 4 multi-family residence 264 Creekside Apartments) TOTAL 891 2] TABLE 2-13 MAJOR NON-RESIDENTIAL SITE PLANS APPROVED IN 2001 AREA MAG PROJECT NAME USE COMP PLAN AREA (SQ FT) DISTRICT COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SERVICES Rio East Medical Center Medical offices 47,100 Rio Neighborhood 2 Kroger Store at Pantops Grocery store 86,430 Rivanna Neighborhood 3 Peter Jefferson Place V Medical offices 75,000 Rivanna Neighborhood 3 Westminster Canterbury Extended care apt bldg. 353,000 Rivanna Neighborhood 3 Fontaine Research Park Medical Research Medical research bldg. 20,899 Samuel Miller Neighborhood 5 Bldg SUBTOTAL 582,429 INDUSTRIAL North Fork District #2, Bldg #1 & #2 Office/industrial space 110,000 Rio Hollymead Community Rivanna Commercial Park Warehousing 81,540 Rio Hollymead Community SUBTOTAL 191,540 OFFICE Martha Jefferson Medical Offices New Medical Bldgs. 47,128 Rivanna Neighborhood 3 SUBTOTAL 47,128 PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL Albemarle SPCA New Shelter Animal shelter/office 17,461 Rio Neighborhood 1 Baker-Butler Elementary School Public school 82,726 Rivanna Hollymead Community South Fork Soccer Center 5 soccer fields & storage 1,920 Rivanna Rural Area 2 Southern Park Public park 617,115 Scottsville Rural Area 4 SUBTOTAL 719,222 TOTAL 1,540,319 III. INVENTORY OF LAND USE An inventory of residential, commercial, and industrial land was conducted to identify population and commercial centers in Albemarle County (see Tables 3-1 and 3-2) in 2001. The analysis of the County's data was facilitated by the identification and grouping of developed and undeveloped properties in residential, commercial, and industrial categories. The purpose of this inventory is to examine the distribution of land uses in specific areas of the County. The inventory of residential, commercial, and industrial development was assembled with the assistance of the County's Comprehensive Information System (CIS); a database which stores parcel related data. The data represented in Tables 3-1 and 3-2 were revised for the 2001 Development Activity Report to reflect Zoning Map Amendments approved in 2001. The data in these tables does not incorporate changes due to development of parcels previously listed in the 2000 Development Activity Report as undeveloped. Therefore, these totals may over-estimate undeveloped property. Also included in this section of the Development Activity Report is an inventory of land currently in the Land Use Assessment Program (see Table 3-3 and 3-4). This program was created in 1971 when the Virginia General Assembly enacted a law permitting localities to adopt special assessments for properties in agriculture, forest, horticulture, and/or open space. The County land use ordinance was adopted in 1975. Since rural area preservation has been an expressed concern in Albemarle County, the inventory of parcels in land use is an estimate of at least part of the acreage currently being maintained in agriculture, forest, horticulture, and open space. The percentage of acreage in land use in 2001 accounts for 68% (see Table 3-3) of the total acreage within Albemarle County. Twenty-one percent of the total acreage within the Designated Development Areas is in land use (see Table 3-4). The amount of land in the Designated Development Areas did not change from the amount recorded in 2000. Seventy percent of the total acreage of the Rural Areas is in land use, a slight increase from 2000. In addition to enrollment in the Land Use Assessment Program, rural landowners also have the option of joining an Agricultural and Forestal District. Agricultural and Forestal Districts are created voluntarily by landowners. By joining an Agricultural and Forestal District, the landowner agrees not to subdivide or develop their property to a more intensive non-agricultural use during the period in which the property remains within a District. The Districts are approved for a period of 4 to 10 years, after which time they are eligible for re-approval. Increased activity in the creation of new Agricultural and Forestal Districts, as well as additions made to existing districts, prompted the listing of these districts in the Development Activity Report for the first time in 1987. The total acreage for all districts was 31,779 acres as of December 31, 1987. As of December 31st, 2001, a total of 64,768 acres were dedicated to Agricultural and Forestal Districts (see Table 3-5). This figure represents 13.93% of the land area in Albemarle County. 23 ~ ~%0 ZZZZZZZ ~' 5'~ ~.~.~.~.~.~.~. 0 ~ C ~ C ~ C ooooooo ~ ooooooo Z ~ 0 0 0 ooooooo 0 0 0 0 000 0 0000000 Z 0 0 0 0 000 0 0000000 ~ 0 0 ~ 0~¢ ~ 00~0~0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ 0 0 ~ 0~ ~ ~~00 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0~ ~ ¢~000~ ~ Z z ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0~ ~ ~~0~ ~ Z - ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~~0 ~ ~~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~~0~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0~ ~ 00000~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~0 ~ 0000~ ~ ¢ 0 0 ~ 0~0 ~ ¢000~0~ ZO ¢ 0 0 ¢ 0¢0 0 ~00~0~ ~ 0 0 ~ 00~ ¢ ~0~00 Z~ ~~ ~ ~%0 ZZZZZZZ c c c c ~' S'~ ~.~. ~.~. ~.~.~. 0 ~ C C m C ~ C ooooooo ~ ooooooo ~ 0 ~~ 0 0 0 ooooooo Z z o ~ o~o~ o o ~ o~o ~ ~o~o~ ~0 z ~ o oooo o o ~ o~ ~ o~o~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~o~o o o ~ o ~ ~ o~¢~~ ~ ~ ~ ~000 0 0 ~ 0~ ~ 0000~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0000 0 0 ~ 0~ ~ 000~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0000 0 0 ~ 00~ ~ 0000~ ~ 0 0000 0 0 0 000 ~ 0000~0~ ~ ~ ~ ~0~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~00~ 000 ~ ~ 0~0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ 00~ ~ ~ 0~00 0 0 ~ O~ ~ ~ ~0 O0000 ~ ~ 0~00 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 O0 O0000 ~ 0 0000 0 0 ~ 0~0 0 0000000 ~ 0 0000 0 0 ~ 0~0 0 0000000 ~ ~ ~0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~00~ 0 TABLE 3-3 ACREAGE IN LAND USE TAXATION BY YEAR AND LAND USE TYPE, 1982-2001 LAND USE TYPE PERCENTAGE YEAR OPEN TOTAL OF TOTAL AGRICULTURE HORTICULTURE FORESTRY SPACE COUNTY ACREAGE 1982 121,917 1,868 227,915 0 351,700 75.6% 1984 108,519 1,919 207,243 9 317,690 68.3% 1985 109,051 1,931 209,312 9 320,303 68.9% 1986 107,832 1,921 208,259 8 318,020 68.4% 1987 110,036 1,952 210,653 8 322,649 69.4% 1988 109,283 1,985 211,489 8 322,765 69.4% 1989 110,236 2,195 216,036 8 328,475 70.6% 1990 109,541 2,306 215,221 6 327,074 70.3% 1991 109,440 2,506 216,389 6 328,341 70.6% 1992 109,932 2,521 218,936 6 331,395 71.3% 1993 110,736 2,447 219,593 6 332,782 71.6% 1994 101,819 2,392 200,950 63 305,224 65.6% 1995 106,571 2,393 211,753 87 320,804 69.0% 1996 105,484 2,412 213,165 134 321,195 69.1% 1997 103,803 2,416 207,138 134 313,491 67.4% 1998 101,925 2,296 202,370 108 306,699 66.0% 1999 107,090 2,026 195,824 126 305,066 65.6% 2000 107,058 2,026 195,683 126 304,893 65.6% 2001 102,316 2,272 201,579 196 314,129 67.5% Note: Totals for 1983 are not available. Estimated total acreage of Albemarle County is 465,040. This estimate was calculated digitally in March 1998. Previous years were re-calculated to reflect this estimate. 2? TABLE 3-4 ESTIMATE OF DISTRIBUTION OF COUNTY LAND UNDER LAND USE, 2001 ACREAGE ACREAGE IN NOT IN TOTAL LAND USE LAND USE Development Areas 4,776 17,520 22,296 Rural Areas 309,354 133,390 442,744 TOTAL 314,130 150,910 465,040 Notes: 1. Total County land area is based on a total area of 726.625 square miles x 640 acres per square mile = 465,040 acres. Approximately 14,000 acres of Rural Areas land, not in land use, is owned by the Federal government (Shenandoah National Park). 2. These estimates were calculated digitally. 25 TABLE 3-$ ALBEMARLE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL/FORESTAL DISTRICTS (As of December 31st, 2001) NAME DATE ACTION/ACREAGE CURRENT ACREAGE PARCELS REVIEW PERIOD REVIEW DATE · Totier Creek 06-29-83 District Created/6,070.77 acres 10 years 06-29-91 District Reviewed/7,246.52 acres 10 years 09-16-92 Addition/1,392.22 acres 10 years 07-10-95 Withdrawal/764.08 10 years 09-11-00 Addition/174.084 10 years 06-20-01 Review/- 781.837 acres 7,007.79 10 years 06-29-2011 2. Hatton 06-29-83 District Created/2,913.69 acres 10 years 12-19-84 Withdrawal/40 acres 10 years 06-29-91 District Reviewed/2,824.22 acres 10 years 07-10-95 Withdrawal/2,035.68 10 years 06-20-01 Review/- 3.741 acres 641.42 10 years 06-29-2011 3. Eastham 10-02-85 District Created/764.75 acres 10 years 10-13-93 District Reviewed/587.30ac 10 years 12-08-93 Addition/135.19ac 10 years 05-11-94 District Reviewed(Cont.)/178.09 ac 900.58 10 years 10-13-2003 4. Blue Run 06-18-86 District Created/1,136.08 acres 8 years 01-04-89 Addition/2,998.67 acres 8 years 07-13-94 District Reviewed/3,634.89 acres 8 years 04-12-95 Addition/60.21 acres 8 years 08-08-01 Addition/174.337 acres 3,755.86 8 years 06-18-2002 5. Keswick 09-03-86 District Created/5,223.11 acres 10 years 09-07-88 Addition/699.01 acres 10 years 01-16-91 Addition/263.00 acres 10 years 10-12-94 District Reviewed/6,063.81 acres 10 years 10-12-94 Addition/320.52 acres 10 years 04-12-95 Addition/17.38 acres 10 years 08-13-97 Addition/190.872 6,592.58 10 years 09-03-2004 3. Kinloch 09-03-86 District Created/1,586.60 acres 10 years 05-02-90 Addition/63.40 acres 10 years 04-14-93 Addition/34.17 acres 10 years 11-17-93 Addition/3.81 acres 10 years 10-12-94 District Reviewed/1,683.96 acres 10 years 10-12-94 Additon/393.16 acres 10 years 09-13-00 Additon/8.85 acres 2,085.97 10 years 09-03-2004 7. Moorman's River 12-17-86 District Created/8,035.98 acres 10 years 09-07-88 Addition/2,269.03 acres 10 years 01-04-89 Addition/173.69 acres 10 years 05-02-90 Addition/443.44 acres 10 years 04-14-93 Addition/170.45 acres 10 years 12-21-94 District Reviewed/9,989.36 10 years 04-12-95 Addition/330.00 acres 10 years TABLE 3-5 (CONT.) ALBEMARLE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL/FORESTAL DISTRICTS NAME DATE ACTION/ACREAGE CURRENT ACREAGE PARCELS REVIEW PERIOD REVIEW DATE 7. Moorman's River (cont.) 08-09-95 Addition/59.92 acres 10 years 08-13-97 Addition/242.38 10 years 05-12-99 Addition/110.44 acres 215 10 years 04-19-00 Addition/81.45 acres 10,813.55 10 years 12-17-2004 ~. Hardware 11-04-87 District Created/8,023.94 acres 10 years 05-03-89 Addition/206.88 acres 10 years 11-12-97 Review/3856.031 acres 10 years 05-13-95 Addition/11.97 acres 10 years 07-12-00 Addition/153.48 acres 4,021.45 10 years 11-12-2007 9. Jacob's Run 01-06-85 District Created/727.28 acres 6 years 05-03-89 Addition/500.43 acres 8 years 03-02-94 District Reviewed/1,124.99 acres 8 years 09-10-96 Withdrawal/107.73 acres 8 years 04-19-00 Review/1017.26 acres 1,017.26 10 years 01-06-2010 10. Carter's Bridge 04-20-85 District Created/7,989.72 acres 10 years 10-31-90 Addition/3,892.38 acres 10 years 05-21-97 Addition/262.75 acres 10 years 09-09-95 District Reviewed/9,004.18 acres 10 years 02-10-99 Addition/ 42.00 acres 10 years 05-12-99 Addition/117.69 acres 9,163.85 10 years 04-20-2008 1. Lanark 04-20-85 District Created/998.05 acres 10 years 09-16-92 Addition/4,625.89 acres 10 years 09-09-95 District Reviewed/5,833.52 acres 10 years 02-10-99 Addition/39.71 acres 10 years 04-20-2008 10-06-99 Addition/154.638 acres 5,827.87 10 years 12. Panorama 04-20-85 District Created/1,088.11 acres 10 years 08-14-95 Addition/42.40 acres 10 years 09-09-95 District Reviewed/285.40 acres 10 years 03-17-99 Addition/7.12 acres 272.52 10 years 04-20-2008 13. Free Union 09-21-85 District Created/1,394.80 acres 10 years 01-04-89 Addition/30.01 acres 10 years 05-15-91 Addition/718.37 acres 10 years 09-09-95 District Reviewed/1,379.27 1,379.27 10 years 09-21-2008 14. Ivy Creek 11-02-88 District Created/578.03 acres 7 years 04-14-93 Withdrawal/55.17 acres 7 years 02-14-96 Review/494.860 acres 494.86 7 years 02-14-2003 15. Buck Mountain 01-04-89 District Created/633.35 acres 10 years 04-12-95 Addition/26.89 acres 10 years 01-13-99 Review/488.92 acres 10 years 10-06-99 Addition/13.55 acres 502.47 10 years 01-04-2009 16. Yellow Mountain 03-08-89 District Created/975.52 acres 10 years 06-24-96 Withdrawal/275.55 acres 10 years 3O TABLE 3-5 (CONT.) ALBEMARLE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL/FORESTAL DISTRICTS NAME DATE ACTION/ACREAGE CURRENT ACREAGE PARCELS REVIEW PERIOD REVIEW DATE 16. Yellow Mountain (cont.) 01-13-99 Review/6$1.29 acres 10 years 05-12-99 Addition/43.77 acres 10 years 05-12-99 Withdrawal/S4.00 acres 641.06 10 years 03-08-2009 17. Chalk Mountain 09-06-$9 District Created/1,272.47 acres 10 years 10-06-99 Review/1,272.47 acres 10 years 04-19-00 Addition/4$.06 acres 1,320.53 10 years 09-06-2009 15. Sugar Hollow 09-06-$9 District Created/2,5$1.97 acres 10 years 05-01-90 Addition/697.72 acres 10 years 04-14-93 Addition/1,524.32 acres 10 years 11-17-93 Addition/55.79 acres 10 years 10-06-99 Review/4,729.14 acres 10 years 01-09-01 Addition/132.251 4,925.74 10 years 09-06-2009 19. Batesville 05-02-90 District Created/906.51 acres 10 years 04-19-00 Review/633.75 acres 10 years 09-13-00 Addition/35.499 acres 10 years 07-11-01 Addition/40.12 acres 712.40 10 years 05-02-2010 20. High Mowing 01-16-91 District Created/622.44 acres 10 years 06-20-01 Review 622.44 10 years 01-16-2011 21. Pasture Fence Mtn. 11-17-93 District Created/S70.42 acres 10 years 07-13-94 Addition/453.50 acres 1,323.92 10 years 11-17-2003 22. N. Fork Moorman's River 11-17-93 District Created/270.45 acres 270.48 10 years 11-17-2003 23. Nortonsville Local 10-06-99 District Created/92.575 acres 92.58 $ years 10-06-2007 24. South Garden 10-06-99 District Created/2,033.33 acres 2,033.33 7 years 10-06-2006 TOTAL 64,765.00 acres 13.93% of 465,040 acres IV. ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MODIFICATIONS A. 2001 REZONING ACTIVITY This section of the Development Activity Report is a review of zoning changes that were approved by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors in 2001. The ability to modify the Zoning Ordinance provides flexibility in land use regulations. The purpose of these actions is to mitigate unreasonable hardships imposed by the ordinance, to recognize compatibility with neighboring uses, and to acknowledge changes in growth patterns that affect the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. A total of 110.05 acres were rezoned in 2001 as a result of 22 Zoning Map Amendment applications, which resulted in 9 Zoning Map modifications (see Table 4-1). The most significant rezoning, in terms of acreage, occurred in Urban Neighborhood 7 with 30 acres rezoned from R-1 to RA. The amount of acreage rezoned by zoning map amendment throughout the County increased in 2001 from a total of 85.68 acres rezoned in 2000. 32 TABLE 4-1 APPROVED ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS, 2001 (changes to zoning classifications) PREVIOUS NEW COMP PLAN AREA ACRES ZONING ZONING Crozet Community R-l, HC PD-MC 6.80 Crozet Community RA PRD 26.56 Neighborhood 2 R-6, R-1 PRD 3.10 Neighborhood 2 C-1 HC 0.60 Neighborhood 2 RA R-4 5.28 Neighborhood 3 R-1 CO 1.18 Neighborhood 3 R-l, R-10 R-15 27.13 Neighborhood 5 R-1 PRD 9.40 Neighborhood 7 R-1 RA 30.00 TOTAL ACREAGE REZONED 110.05 33 B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MODIFICATIONS IN 2001 The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors adopted the current, revised Land Use Plan in June 1996. This revised plan incorporated several changes from the previous plan. The new Land Use Plan places an increased emphasis on promoting infill development of a more urban scale within the Development Areas. To achieve this goal the Plan recommends: Achieving higher gross densities of development in the Development Areas; Encouraging mixed use developments; Encouraging neighborhood style development and design; Encouraging road development and design to be of a scale more in keeping with surrounding neighborhoods which also accommodates multiple modes of transportation such as bicycle, pedestrian and mass transit; and, Encouraging interconnection of neighborhoods with provision of walkways, bikeways, open space areas, and neighborhood scale street systems; Emphasizing the provision of necessary public facilities and services to support such scale of development including water, sewer, and recreation facilities. In January 1997, the Board of Supervisors began the Development Area Initiatives Project to provide guidance on obtaining a higher quality of development in the Development Areas and on master planning the urban neighborhoods, communities, and villages. A Board appointed committee, the Development Areas Initiative Steering Committee, began work in February 1997 and completed their work in March 2000. In April 2000, they recommended a three-volume report, The Neighborhood Model, to the Board of Supervisors. The first volume provided 12 guiding principles for new development and a template for developing master plans. The second volume provided implementation strategies. The third volume contained the supporting documents for the recommendations. In May of 2000, the Board of Supervisors forwarded the report to the Planning Commission and asked the Commission to consider Volume 1 as a Comprehensive Plan amendment to the 1996 Land Use Plan. From June to December 2000, the Commission held worksessions to consider significant planning and development changes proposed in the report and to edit the document. The Commission forwarded its recommended report to the Board of Supervisors on February 20, 2001 and the Board adopted the report, "The Neighborhood Model, Building Block for the Development Areas (Volume 1)" on May 16th, 2001. In 2001, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors also approved three (3) other Comprehensive Plan Amendments, as follows: Revision of the recommendations for transportation improvements along (and adjacent) to the Route 29 corridor in the Land Use Plan, Hollymead Community Profile. (CPA 00-05, Hollymead Community-Route 29 Corridor Transportation, approved February 7, 2001); Adoption of a road alignment and design for the Meadow Creek Parkway (Phase 1, City limits to Rio Road) and related land use recommendations for lands along the road corridor as identified in the Jones and Jones Consultant Study. (CPA 01-06, Meadow Creek Parkway, approved October 12, 34 2001 ); and Amendment to the recommended land uses in the Land Use Plan, Hollymead Community Profile to encourage a mixed-use town center in an area east of Route 29 and south of Airport Road. (CPA 98-03, Hollymead Town Center, approved October 10, 2001) 35 V. APPENDIX N COMMUNIIIES VILLAGES IIIIIIIlll i,,,,,,ll aue. aL AREAS COMPI?EHEN$1VE PLAN AI?EA$ 36 CO UN TY OF A L BEIVIA I?L E UI?BANAI?EA 0 AREA CITY OF AREA 37 County of Albemarle HALL 4 Kilometers 6 MA GIS TERIAL DIS TRIC TS 38 MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2002 · Mission · Essential Tasks Assessment · Construction & Maintenance · Planning & Traffic Engineering · lSSlles Mission The VDOT Charlottesville Residency builds and maintains roads, provides transportation expertise and regulatory authority and facilitates traffic engineering issues for Albemarle and Greene Counties in ways that are: focused on public safety fiscally and environmentally responsible supportive of alternative transportation means supportive of neighborhood and regional development 2 ESSENTIAL TASKS TASK MAINTAIN SECONDARY & PRIMARY ROADS o ROW: mow, ditch, pipes, trim, signs, patrols ASSESSMENT (see legend below) REMARKS Secondary & primary mowing objectives met; applied dust control Installed pipes, guardrails/trimmed brush; shoulder repair o ROADWAY: grade, pave, patch o EMERGENCY OPS o REPAIR & BUILD BRIDGES o MAINTAIN EQUIPMENT Legend: Green: 90-100% Excellent Amber: 80-90% Good, room for improvement Red: 70-80% Needs improvement Black: Below minimum standards - Patched per schedules; machined gravel roads - Tree removal, Rt 601; cleaned out pipes - Storm damage cleanup Rt 6 - Route 33, Greene County, widen bridge, 90% complete - PMs completed 3 ESSENTIAL TASKS (continued) TASK 2. MANAGE CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM o PE Activities ASSESSMENT (see legend below) o Project Construction Legend: Green: 90-100% Excellent Amber: 80-90% Good, room for improvement Red: 70-80% Needs improvement Black: Below minimum standards REMARKS - Switched traffic on Rt 22 bridge project. - Surface treatment schedule completed 4 ESSENTIAL TASKS (continued) Task Assessment (See legend below) 3. CONDUCT PLANNING ACTIVITIES Remarks o Issue and review permits o Review site plans and rezoning request o Conduct studies and advise - 25 land use permits issued - 7 new site plans reviewed & comments provided - 4 Special Use Permits reviewed & comments provided - 3 ZMAs reviewed & comments provided - 8 developments in planning stages o Inspect and monitor subdivisions Legend: Green: 90-100% Excellent Amber: 80-90% Good, room for improvement Red: 70-80% Needs improvement Black: Below minimum standards - 5 subdivision plan reviews - 2 subdivisions being inspected for acceptance 5 ESSENTIAL TASKS (continued) TASK ASSESSMENT (see legend below) 4. FACILITATE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING o Request and advise on signals & signs o Request and advise on studies & data o Assist with design REMARKS - 26 Traffic issues reviewed - 3 Traffic issues under review Legend: Green: 90-100% Excellent Amber: 80-90% Good, room for improvement Red: 70-80% Needs improvement Black: Below minimum standards 6 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING September 2002 Albemarle County Six-Year Plan Project Status Primary Projects PPM L&D Street Name/ Fiekl Fiekl Route S Designer ProjectNumber Description Scoping Survey Review P.H. Inspect. R/W Adv. Comments 20 15996 BAA 0020-002-126,PE101 Bridge Replacement-Carters 7-03 On schedule (updated7/02) 53 18897 BAA 0053-002-101,B601 Bridge Rephcement-Bucklshnd 2-02 11-02 2-03 10-03 9-04 On Schedule (updated7/02) 250 50569 DWS 0250-002-114,115,C51 Bddge Rept-Carro fi&Limestone 2-02 1-03 Maybe dehyed due to MCIrelocations 7 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING September 2002 Albemarle County Six-Year Plan Project Status Secondary Roads Route PPMS Designer Project Number Description Scoping Survey Review P.H. Inspect. R/W Adv. Comments Airpo r~ Re ad 649 2456 SLM 0649-002-158,C501 4-1 ..... ~v/sidewalks &bike 1 ..... :::::::::::::::::: 12-03 On schedule (Updated 12-01) Jazman Gap Rd 691 11129 DWS 0691-002-158,C501 2-lanes ~v/bike lanes &side~valk 8-02 4-03 3-04 6-06 On Schedule (Updated 5-02) Mchztire Rd. Ex[.Ne~vAlignment 631 2530 BAA 0631-002-128,C502 Meado~vCreekPark~vay 10-02 2-03 4-03 6-03 6-05 On Schedule (Updated 5-02) Free State Rd. Connector -- 52393 JWH R000-002-259,C501 Construct 2 lanes on 4-lane R/W 12 MOS. Inactivity - Awaiting RNV Gravel Roads Mountain Vista Rd.Route 6 to 1.2 Mi. E. Rte. 6 On Schedule (Updated 5-02) 737 54425 0737-002-P68,N501 Widen, pave &replace bzSdge N/A N/A N/A N/A :::::::::::::::::: 12-02 Gravel Road Project SecretazTs Re ad R/W not available on 2 parcels 708 11130 0708-002-P 77,N501Widen and P ave 8-02 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6-02 8-03 (Updated 8-02) Welt Leigh Dr. Rte 250 to 0.4 Mi. N. Rte 250 (Updated 5-02) 1641 56085 1641-002-269,N501 T ...... h 2',replace Pipe & ..... lay N/A N/A N/A N/A :::::::::::::::::: 12-02 Rural addition 8 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING Seplember 2002 Greene County Six Year Plan Project Status Secondary Projects Field Field Route PPMS Designer Project Description Scope Survey Review P.H. hsp. R/W Adv. Comments Bacon Ho 11o wRoad Vvtden and straighten 2-lane road, aay 627 51022 RDL 0627-039-195,C501 Fr. Rte. 615 to Rte 632 5-02 9-02 1-03 6-03 12-05 (updated7/02) D~e Road Vvtden and straighten 2-lane road,aay 810 2920 DVvS 0810-039-146,C501 Fr. 1.7 km E. Rte. 624 to Rte. 624 8-03 (updated 7/02) Gravel Roads May) Road 650 57314 0650-039-P56,N501 Fr. Rte. 810toRte. 615 :::~:~:~:~ !i:~?~ :~:~:~:~:~ :~:~:~ :~:~:~:~:~ :~:~:~:~ :~:~:~:~ :~:~:~ :~:~:~:~ :~:~ :~:~:~:~ :~?: 12-02 VvidenandSufface Treat-Gravelroad 0.35 Mi. E. Rte 619 618 0618-002-P ,N (2)range Co. Line 02-02 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: 11-03 Vviden and Surface Treat-Gravelroad WatsonRoad 640 2515 0640-039-137,N501 Fr. Rte.633 to Dead End 06-03 :::~?~ :~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ :~:~:~:~:~:~:~ :~:~:~ :~:~:~ :~:~:~ :~:~:~:~ ?: 11-05 VvtdenandSuffaceTreatGravelRd. 9 CONSTRUCTION PAVING & CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2002 Percent Street Name Project Description Duration Complete Contract Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Cost 0022-002-1010, SR02 Bridge Replacement Louisa Rd Comments: Traffic switch to Phase l section of new bridge on 8-27-02. Demolish 60 62 existing bridge, drive piles and begin concrete work for Phase II during September. Various PM-7B-02 IAsphalt Plant Mix Secondaries and Comments: Complete Rte. 29 SBL from 250 Ramp to Frontage Rd. first week of 55 55 Primaries September. Plan to begin paving Rte. 250 at Pantops by mid September. Various ST-7B-02 I Asphalt Surface Treatment Secondaries Comments: Completed on August 20, 2002. Various SS-7B-02 I Asphalt Slurry Seal Subdivisions Comments: Forrest Lakes subdivision to be complete by end of August. Isolated 70 70 roads in Briarwood, Berkeley and Hessian Hills remain to complete by mid September. Various TP-7B-02 I Pavement Marking I Secondaries Comments: Secondary roads in southeast area of the county complete. Southwest 50 50 Various PCP-7-02 Pipe Culvert Rehabilitation Secondaries and Comments: Culvert repair under Rte. 29, 1.5 miles south of I- 64, will complete project 98 98 Primaries by first of September. [ 10 MAINTENANCE YANCEY MILLS HEADQUARTERS MOWING AUGUST 637-688-689-708-692-710-693-694 SEPTEMBER Finish second cycle of mowing PATCHING 635-636 635-708 GRADE/MACHINE/ADD STONE DITCH/PIPE GUARDRAIL 702-782 RT. 29-240-690-691 Rt. 29 As needed Rt. 758 pipe maint. 250-240-635-684-690-691-693-692 EQUIP MAINT EMERGENCY OPS Per schedule As scheduled; equipment readiness, inspection preparation 11 MAINTENANCE FREE UNION HEADQUARTERS MOWING PATCHING GRADEIMACHINEI ADD STONE DITCH/PIPE GUARDRAIL EQUIP MAINT EMERGENCY OPS OTHER AUGUST 2002 664-665 -671 -810-614 -675 Monitoring contract mowing-all A HQ 601 -1406-671 -1430 606-643 671 -601 -668 -1406-1430-846 29-676 -601 -654 Per schedule After Hours Accident cleanup on Route 743 Tree removal at Route 821-614 Tree Removal on Route 601 Brush Removal for sight distance 660-662-676-743 SEPTEMBER 2002 Monitoring contract mowing-all AHQ Primary, Interstate 601 -664 -673 Spot Patching As needed As needed 29-250-Secondary Equipmentreadiness, inspection preparation 12 MAINTENANCE BOYD TAVERN HEADQUARTERS MOWING AUGUST Rts 616-623-842-865-685-731-744-808-828-836-809- 729-732-762-1122-1123-1124-1120-1121-1055-1146- 1107-F180-F179- 1090-1109 SEPTEMBER Rts 631-649-643-769 PATCHING Rts 302-600-648-729 Shoulders 631-22-250 GRADE/MACHINE/ADD STONE DITCH/PIPE Rts 600-762-640 Rts 600-659-615-64-20 Rts 769-762 Rts 250-769-762 GUARDRAIL Mowing EQUIP MAINT EMERGENCY OPS OTHER Rt 621 Per schedule; dry run prep Repair work on Rt615 project Complete As scheduled; equipment readiness, inspection preparation 13 MAINTENANCE KEENE HEADQUARTERS MOWING AUGUST Rts 627-726-625-725-770-723-715-703-626-602-800- 630-717-719-692-693-826-712-633-632-837-840; cut r/w on 712 SEPTEMBER Rts. 631-708-706-642-627-727-620-795 PATCHING Rts 1301-1309-1304-1310-708 Rt 719-755-708 GRADE/MACHINE/ADD STONE DITCH/PIPE Rt 708 Rts 708-712-795-633-631-774-713-761 Ditch shoulder 1166-1167; clean pipe Rte 20 GUARDRAIL Mowing EQUIP MAINT EMERGENCY OPS Boom ax Rt 29-708-631-1128-712-602 Per schedule Clean up fallen 717-726-20-6 trees on Rts 627-620-626-727-826- Rt 602 As scheduled; equipment readiness, inspection preparation 14 MAINTENANCE STANARDSVILLE HEADQUARTERS MOWING PATCHING GRADE/MACHINE/ADD STONE DITCH/PIPE GUARDRAIL EQUIP MAINT EM ERGENCY OPS AUGUST Rts 604-622-646-624-633-615-612-810-603-634-627- 628-601-663-617-633-624-622 Skin patching 633-653-1105-1111-1112-1113-1114- 1115 Machine 637-626-624; dust control 642 Guardrail mowing on 29-33 Per schedule SEPTEMBER Rts 621-1101-637-619-638-634-632-676- 640-605-29-33 Plant mix 663-623-624 Machine 614-632-676; slope bank 630; dust control as needed Replace pipe on 810 & 623~633 int. As scheduled; equipment readiness, inspection preparation 15 Equipment AREA HQ POSSIBLE # OF # DAYS iN THE # DAYS % RATING E Q U iP M E N T iT E M D A Y S S H O P O P E R A T IO N A L (C O L O R ) O P ER A TIO N A L Y A N C E Y M iLLS Trucks 8 248 43 205 82.66% A m b e r L o a d e rs 1 31 0 31 100 . 00 % G re e n G ra d e r 2 62 0 62 100 . 00 % G re e n Tractor mowers 4 124 21 103 83.06% Amber 31 7 24 77.42% R ed ,,FREE UNION Trucks 7 217 40 177 81.57% Am b e r L o a d e rs 1 31 0 31 100 . 00 % G re e n B a c k h o e 1 31 0 31 100 . 00 % G re e n Tractor m ow e rs 3 93 12 81 87.10% Am b e r Roiiers 2 " 62 0 62 100.00% G .... G ra d e rs 2 62 0 62 1 00 .00 % G re e n B O Y D TAVERN Trucks 7 217 44 173 79.72% Red L o a d e rI 31 20 11 35 .48 % B la c k ~ o ii~ ~ i 31 0 31 100 . 00 % G re e n Tractor m o w e rs 4 124 34 90 72.58% Red G ra d e rs 1 31 1 3 1 8 58 .06 % B la c k K E E N E Trucks 7 217 33 184 84 79% Am be r L o a d e rs 2 62 0 62 100 00 % G re e n B ~ ~ k h o ~ ~ i 31 0 31 100 00% Green Tractor m o w e rs 4 124 0 124 100 00% G re e n R o lie rs 2 62 0 62 1 00 00 % G ree n S T A N A R D S V iL L E Trucks 7 217 10 207 95.39% G ree Loaders 1 31 0 31 100.00% G ree G ra d e rs 2 62 3 59 95 .1 6% G ree T ra c to r m o w e rs 4 124 0 124 100 . 00% G ree C h ip p e rs 1 31 0 31 100 . 00% G ree B rid g e C re w Trucks 4 124 2 122 98.39% G ree n R ed: 70-80% N e e d s im pro ve m e n t B la c k : B e Io w m in im u m s tan d a rd s 16 PLANNING Traffic Traffic Study Study Site Plan Project Scoping Review Review Current Status AlbemarleTowneCenter(Sperry) iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiii TrafficStudyReviewfortheComprehensivePlanAmendmentstage ihasbeencompleted. Additonalsubmissionswillbemadeatthe iPeter Jefferson/Martha Jefferson Site iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i i~ iiiiiiiii iZoning Map Amendment, Special Use Permits,and Traffic Study iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii icommentshavebeenforwardedtotheCounty. Awaitingsiteplanto iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii irespondtostudy recommendations. RivannaVillageatGlenmore iAwaitingsiteplantorespondtostudyrecommendations. Countyto iN~AhP~int~ iiiililililililililililililililililililililililililililililiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiii iStudyCommentsforwardedtocountystaff. iL i Hollymead iiiiiiiiiiiii~i~iiiiiiiiiiii iVDOT, and County Staff are working with applicants' consultant to iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii establishstudyparameters. i Blue Ridge Hospital/Monticello iii~ i~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i Scoping process underway. Visitors Center i Pantops Ridge iii~ i~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i Sc opi ng proc ess un derway. iL i Sandy Lane Village iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Review of traffic study delayed at request of County Staff due to Area i ]7 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Traffic Engineering Issues Report: Outstanding Route Location Issue Type 20 South of 649 Signage 20 20 & 250 Signage 20 At Viewmont Farm Drive Signage 29 Old 29 S. of bypass ramp Signage 29 Monacan Trail Rd. Signage 29 29 & 641 Signal Warrant 64 Ramp from SB 29 to EB Signage 631 Pen Park Lane & Rio Signage 643 1/4 mi east of Route 29 Signage 660 676 to 743 Signage 854 Carrsbrook Speed Limit 1270 1270 & 781 Signage Issue Description Guardrail requested Turn lanes at route 250 Bus stop requested School Zone Bus Stop Requested Warrant analysis requested Additional signage Additional signage Guardrail needed Additional signage Excessive speeds Sight distance at entrance to subdivision Albemarle Received $/12/2002 $/26/2002 $/21/2002 $/23/2002 $/21/2002 5/17/2002 $/25/2002 $/13/2002 $/9/2002 $/13/2002 7/21/2002 8/27/2002 Issue Status under review under review under review under review under review under review under review under review under review under review under review under review Outstanding Traffic Engineering Issues Report: Route Location Issue Type Issue Description 33 MP 50.12 to M P 53.12 Signage Speed study requested 630 1/2 mile west of Rt 810 Signage Road Safety 743 629 to 627 Speed Limit Speed limit reduction requested Greene Received $/22/2002 $/13/2002 6/10/2002 Issue Status under review under review under review Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Culpeper TED Charlottesville Res. Culpeper TED 18 ISSUES 19 Slurry Seal What is Slurry Seal? RECEIVED At Date: ---- ~'~/~ Fact She'et #: Cle~ ~ls~ Slurry Seal is a mixture of aggregate, asphalt emulsion, and filler, mixed together according to a laboratory's design-mix formula and applied to the road surface. Asphalt emulsion is a three-part solution consisting of liquid asphalt, water, and emulsifier. This solution serves as a binder, holding the crushed aggregate together and adhering the mixture to the road surface. The aggregate is a clean, crushed, durable, properly graded, and uniform stone. How is Slurry Sealed applied? Slurry Seal is mixed and applied using specially designed equipment, which blends the raw materials together and spreads the mixture in a continuous manner to insure a smooth uniform surface. The mixture is spread over one lane at a time in one single pass and can be reopened to traffic within two to three hours of application. For a few days following the application, loose material may be dislodged from the new asphalt surface, and crews will return and clean up any residue materials. Why use Slurry Seal? Slurry Seal is used in the asphalt maintenance programs to protect the pavement from damage caused by water seepage. By periodic use of slurry seal in conjunction with resurfacing, the life-cycle cost for the roadways surface can be reduced. Preventive maintenance is more cost-effective than corrective maintenance. When to use Slurry Seal? Slurry Seal should be used before pavement cracking occurs. This initial cracking starts to occur in pavement at five years. Therefore it is recommended to apply the slurry seal treatment at or before five years into the life cycle of the pavement followed by resurfacing with Asphalt Plant Mix at ten years. Where to use Slurry Seal? Slurry Seal is primary used on local roads and in subdivisions where less traffic is present to break down the structure of the pavement. By sealing these roads the pavement will be less susceptible to damage from water penetration and maintain longer the structural integrity of the pavement. ., Common Resident Concerns Tracking of asphalt into driveways, Asphalt in the gutter pan, Rutting of pavement, Bumps in pavement, Excessive gravel, Chunks of asphalt and debris left behind. Resource information was obtained from the ISSA (International Slurry Surfacing Association) web site at www.slurry, or.q COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Duane and Joyce Smith -- Request to amend Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Public hearing to consider amending the ACSA Jurisdictional Area boundary to provide water service to Tax Map 32, Parcel 24H. STAFF CONTACT(S): Tucker, Foley, Cilimberg, Benish, Biel AGENDA DATE: September 4, 2002 ACTION: X CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: INFORMATION: Yes BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting Jurisdictional Area designation for water service to a 3.00 acre parcel located at 3503 Pritchett Lane (Route 785), approximately 1,200 feet north of Proffit Road (Attachment A - applicant's request, Attachment B - tax map). The property is located within the designated Rural Areas, in the Rivanna Magisterial District. The site is located east of Pritchett Lane, which forms a boundary for the Hollymead Development Area and the Jurisdictional Area, for water only, to the west (Attachment C). Approximately twelve years ago the existing water line was relocated from the west side of Pritchett Lane to the east side during road improvements to Pritchett Lane performed by VD©T. The existing line served Northwoods Mobile Village, located on the west side of Pritchett Lane. Due to right-of-way and grading issues, and the time factor of reinstalling the water line for Northwoods Mobile Village, the water line was relocated on the east side of Pritchett Lane. In addition, the meter boxes are also located on the east side of Pritchett Lane. The water line was located on the applicant's property without an easement being granted. The existing well is currently stressed. The applicant has informed staff that water flow is extremely Iow and can only use water for approximately ten minutes before flow is completely lost. It then takes approximately three hours to regain minimal flow. The applicant has supplied staff with a well driller's report that supports the applicant's request (Attachment E). The well driller (C. R. Moore Well Drilling Company, Inc.) has indicated there is an insufficient water supply to support the applicant's normal water usage. Furthermore, there is limited access to the property, which would make it difficult to drill another well. The applicant has supplied photographs showing the location of the water line and meter box (Attachment F). DISCUSSION: The subject property is located in the Rural Area. The Comprehensive Plan provides the following concerning the provision of water and sewer service to the Rural Areas: "General Principle: Urban Areas, Communities, and Villages are to be served by public water and sewer (p. 109)." "Provide water and sewer service only to areas within the ACSA Jurisdictional Areas (p. 125)." "Follow the boundaries of the designated Development Areas in delineating Jurisdictional Areas (p.125)." AGENDA TITLE: Duane and Joyce Smith -- Request to amend Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area September 4, 2002 Page 2 "Only allow changes in the jurisdictional areas outside of the designated Development Areas in cases where the property is: 1) adjacent to existing lines; and 2) public health and/or safety are in danger (p.125)." The property meets the criteria for adjacency to a Jurisdictional Area. The applicant has not drilled any additional wells to determine whether another acceptable location can be found on-site, so staff cannot confirm that the criteria for public health and/or safety is met. The parcel is small and narrow, but is one (1) acre larger than the minimum rural area lot size. RECOMMENDATION: Typically, the applicant must provide documentation that supports the applicant's request. Although a well driller's report has been provided that states the existing well, is in effect, dry and there is limited access to the property, an attempt has not been made to locate an alternative on-site well. If the Board of Supervisors is of the opinion that this current condition of the existing well is sufficient to document the need for public water, staff would recommend approval for "water service only." Attachments: A - Application B - Tax Map C - Jurisdictional Area D - Survey Plat E - Well Driller's Report F - Photographs 02.134 APPLICATION TO AMEND .THE · SERVICE AUTHORITY · · JURISDICTIONAL' AREAs C0-A_PPLICAlqT Name (or agent, if any): Ad~ss: A,'I-TA Cl I ~d[.ENT A E-~ rm.~k~eev/ll~ VA ~02~6 : I;04 296-$~2a : ~ ' '~ "' '~'.'.5":.' ~-~ .'. ~JItJSDi~TIOlqAL ARIBA'DEsIONATION RtiQuEsTED: [] Water mid Sewor i2. wator Oray to. ~istins stnmur~(s) ~low) ....... cURKENT SERVICE AREA DESIGNATION (If any): .;' :.': ..., 2' .' :-]:"';' ' "-' [] Water and'Sewer ret Only ( .'.i .... ': ' '.:. ·· · . . : ~. · ; .' .. .:...: :. 7 :. · El. Water Oiily ~o Existiag. S~iur~ [--I. Limited Service · ' 'JUSTIFICATION.FOR REQI.I~ST: ~ ~ C~ ~"iai;.:-.:';._. i]':' ' · '.. .' . . ~. ' '~ ....... ~ ., .p ' ~- - ' ':r'q'-:- (:-"~'.--.1"7"? -:~q- ; ' ,:.' . · j_.:' '"~,.."_~ .',,,,~_'~..'_,.~_L~".'~_~.,a~ -": .... · ...... ~-.q- ..-. V. ~' ' P'" ' *'".'k" : '-":,': ':;::,-; · ,~..j..~:m~ ~...~2~_ _r~ .~ ....... .- ,.' :. · . · · _'._L'_: .t.'_' ';._'-i:' ii::_iL.:::;.Y': .'. ', .' ............... · ' ' "_'~ · -' ":: ' '"~ 3"' :i" "i';" - '..'. '..[ :"::".-'" "":"' '.' .'_.i ...... -_ ....." .'FOr'Staff Use Only'.: '.. · .' ",.'[.'?:'.:.'~?i.".;.:.i:-;i-!~'ii.~ i~i:.il~:,i;i ." '; '.'. ..-".~':' :'."." .' .... - '~* ' ' .' "'";." "' ..... · "'.' '.'L" · '/" fv...'?'-'"~'f: "':' . 'di', ." .... · .... I -~"-, ....... : - .'.~-~X · ' · '' ·., ...... ...:". . ': ...... '...:..'::75;.'.. ..' '~.2:..,~.~.;.:'::..,: ~.¢..z:i~;'..:[lki.:i'~ '.*..L ' · · : · .'.,'1 'PXUPP-.RTy 15 LOGA'T~D {Check.Appmprmte): · .: ;-.' '. '~ :.',' ",, :",: "'"'."' '": '.'~';';>;;'v':'.'; i'.?'.'~'~iq[.'""."-'.:''' "1 '~h'.x'~' ' ' .....' ............. ~ ......... ~ 'h~' :~' ~i ' '' '/"' ...... i' ' '':'.."% "~'~;':.','~"'"' · '~ ': .... "' ''-.' · '. i ' .' · '- '.:'.". '":'' .' ".'.' :...'" ....'. '....'[, ::',[l.'.'~'"[.~{'i%li:.]~'l I~}'..'.. .. , · · ...m .- ' ""t ""'::': ; ...... ' " ....... ' .... "' " ' ' ' ' '"" ' "; ~ "~ g''';''l'~'~d ,,'~ '.,, · .' "'." ..... ~'~''. '" ', "' · ' · - '' " ' ' .' ...... '-"'" ' .... '~' '":'."-""~'" ~'~ .::'""~ "" ~'-","'~-', , "i'."" · ~": .'.'.'. ;57.:.:..,.'~:.'.'[~ '.',~ule o~ .FIOutside. a Water-Supply Wabershed?..'.. I-1 '~dja~nt',o i~'~.",~,h..~ii* "."."..'.t~ · :.~'>, -':".~ '-;: .. '.'..":"' ,' ' · .... ' · .' .... ' ' · .... ": ...... ' '.' .' :-' ..... ' .... ', .."-.'. 'L, ", -'. ;,'" 1 '~._m'_~i,ii.~l dictate of w'ate~/sew~.r ~* pro~d to pi~O'h'de ~*~i~'_.i.' ;..::.i'.-'i'?'"" -' ' -' ..' t ' :'~-?,:'-";""'~ :-,'."r.",~'".'.: :" .::." .' ': ..,". ' ' · .' '.' . · .'. ' .' .. ·. -' .:.. ]:'- . ...' :' :~.... -. ' :..C. :",-' .. ,- - .;-". ..... ..'. '...._ .';--;'L,¢';~A-~..i ~.'~.,~.~-~'.' ~:; i I~,.¢,,> ..;. · ' 'C".'-.'I' '::::<~" :',"'.'* :.':':q_: :...:-..'.".'.-'.." :' - -. '- ..... ': '., '": ...... :. '.- .. ..... ·: .... ?'~-. :..' :: ..'.:-' : ,.',?'- :. ..'.. :.,..'. '-~::.~..'T-'.%.,'rS...'r'. , .. ".l. : '. , 'l · . :'..:.. ,... 1....L., ..' .. .'. ,_% . ' . .. '.. ,..-':. 1..'~.':; .'..'..~'...:: .~ ,~?'.1~"",~:'_','. ' ¢ ~. ''" ]: r ~..~.,_':"_~!.~.. ...... -"' '"'::c:c":'~' : "~"", " '' · ' ' '"' '' "- · :".'"'-' : .... "q":'. ..... ';.''~ ........ ,d':."- '"'.', "'-~ ' ~3v~.~,-~'' · ': ."" '. t '.-,,.v-. ~ ~' ,'..','. -. ':. · '..' .' . .' .... .. ..', ~.: ,...........,-<...,,,,~:.~.,~...:.~,,'~:,x..'..,~J,4&:...~ ~:~'":~'i.'~.t ~.~,,~',,,,'.-" . · ....., ' · · . ..... · ...... ~ ........ ..~-..~. q-.-..' ,,: ~Pq~iF:.~i:l li.,!.'-~..'.>,.-, ." '"... ::.':..':'.... . ' · ..' .... . '..'.. '.'.-'.-:.77: ..-:':ir..:-:':~'.:'i ~'[.-.;'-Li~.:i':..'..:: i;~L.;.:::'.'.: · ,'..." . ..... ' · · · · .,"" ., ..3:./ ,' .' .~;.,:,:;..'~.~ .: ,[,, ',.it. ~. ['..-" ."'.. · · . '.":'.. "'. ' "· · · ' ."',..',".' "...'...:'":"'' ''.~.'; 3;.": ~;i~;.!,'.:'~ :i,;i~'.: ..' · . · :-'."..~,.'._... .- · . · '. - . .' · . '-. - '.. · · · : u,':.-"Jr' ..~ ~.'-y,'[":.[t' ;";M~".'- · ..: ..."...':':.' .,;.. · .. '. .. ' · · " ' · '. . , .. · :":'" . . :, ~}."..i.:.:J..... .~.¥"~ ,: .' . ...-.-,~:.',,~..:.'.":...~...'..F, '.. ' ' ' ' '. ' , ' '.." ' ..... '. . ·" .3.'"'-~"~.".':'.' ~ L' ,~,]:'.','l,'[::lJi}~;'-';'."- · ' ...... "'":'"'- '-":' - .' "'· ' ' ' · · "" ' ': ..':"..-.': '.' :.' ..' ". ;"-'-".-:'.i~;";'.:"': !~ i' .d'~'--"~:,.~':'f.~!t~-':-'"::': ~L.,_.~LL_ I~_ ..... ~ ....................... '. '.~J '' '~ r ,? ...2 'Albemarle Cou. nty Sewice.Authority Jurisdictional. Areas Map LEGEND WATER ONLY WATER AND SEWER WATER ONLY TO EXISTING STRUCTURES . [Please see "Lrsf of .Ex[sting Structures OR Development Rights" for specific structures and dates..] LIMITED SERVICE [PL6ASE SEE "dst Of Existing Strudures OE Development'. Rights" for specific limitations.] VISED: B/10/83, ~/11/98 ALBEMARLE· .11~, COUNTY RIVANN.~. DIgTEI~T$ SECTION · A LB£MARL ~_ COUNTY ./ .j ..... ' ..... SEOTION ,- -.,, RIVANNA DISTRIOT 3 ?_..A., · .?:.~.: :~,~,.~.' ~,.-$'~.'..',.,.~ .. ,..~..~-~. '..rq'.... ~.~ .~'.,.,.;..',-.~'.' ~,:~r',',,..~-.,.~-~'¢~r:".-.. · · . . · · ..-. ...' · .'..: ';?:,' '¢,.' ., ~% .'~' '],: · ~ · ~ ....".'f':'.' " L ".' .' : ::" -'...'. .:, :. "~.: ." '.' ,".'.".";'.~'." .'.': ...... .'.'. ..... , . '" ,: ;':'-' ' . ' '. .... ~',:','~'J,.'~''~". r' .~... - -.' ~..;.." d..~::..~'. '_:.,'.' .'-.:-. ,'. ../' ~"'":.' ':-..:.'. .... .'L.":~'~S.:.."'.:'tc'..:[':.' '~'. '.' · . -.,.:.,,%..,~:..,%~,~,...~ · .. ..... :.- .. ~... , .. . . ,.. :: · ~ ~ · . . ... ., ~ :~..:(. · ...... .. . ~ ....... :;. .~:.~..~... .'"~..~....~ ~.. . .,~ ..~'~-.~'.~-'r~-'...::...' · ..... · . .. .. ~ -. .....,' x '.:. ' . ~ '~" '-".~"~' ~.~:1" ~"'~P ~ - ' ' · ',~.~, .'. ,-- '-:-. :.. . .... .... -_ ' , , .. ....... ...._~.."_'..'...'.. .....>~... _ .... '"" ""'.'~"'-'"'"".' · ~ ~ : · " · "'7' ' -' ','." ~-' '.7--~-~-'.-,--7 .'~.'". i" "."' '.".' / '! , ' .... · ' '..".'. ;': · ::" · ..k.~;-i,~'.':. "" ?) ' ""'~ '~"" · .~:.' ',.:,'].:. '. . .'~ ..... : · ~ .'-~ ':'.'.',..: ,--~r..Z '/ , .. L.':.. · '~' '. · - · ~' ,s ~ ~-'~ ~.',~ ' .. · . . ~t~' ........ · . ,'a:..~I'''~ . . · '.': 'z f ... .,,~ ,:~ .~. -" '? ,.'~ ? ' C"- C. R. Moore Well Drilling .Company, In'c, ATrACHMEi~T ~, 2238 Pdc}t~roND. Rolo C-MARLOTT~SVLLLE, VA Contractor £~ ~0054400 tlC_r. Dw~yn~ Smith 22911-7999. [accIONE: Aug~t~ ~, 2002 434-977-3818 FAx-: · Dear Mr. Smith; As f a~ it, ~ am ontytwo opti~, anti on~ talks na Health D~ent al;qTmv~ which I do not f&el CaLtamwill be graurock l, Hook up lo County war~-, whre~t you adviard already rana thro;tgh ~oarlpropm'ry, · 2. Dril~ a secoad we[I, pendiag the H¢~h D~pattm~nt's apprrr~ of a. ,itc ¢r~ your iyro~ny, · Agnin,.ha my opiaio~, ~ County warn: oporto is ~e only v/abi, choice. Shazild yim 1~r7¢ my'addieiorml q~tiona, please f~et frc~ to ~oatace roe. l.~army L. Moore. .............. ii/l:en you think of water, thJ~k C. R. Moore/ !,..o()Mn.r..; nort:h on Pril'che[t Lane. Tl~e applicant's propelty is o;n the fight with tl~e fence, and the entrance to Nod;hwoods Mobile Village is on the leE. Me,er box is ~ocaled on '[he northwest corner of the applicant's proper~y.. COUNTY EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Phillip Hawkins -- Request to amend Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Public hearing to consider amending the ACSA Jurisdictional Area boundary to provide water service to Tax Map 78, Parcel 43A. STAFF CONTACT(S): Tucker, Foley, Cilimberg, Benish, Biel AGENDA DATE: September 4, 2002 ACTION: X CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: Yes ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: INFORMATION: BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting Jurisdictional Area designation for water service to a .53 acre parcel located at 2091 North Hill, approximately 600 feet east of Route 250 East and approximately 250 feet south of the Ramada Inn (Attachment A - applicant's request, Attachment B - location and tax map). The property is located within the designated Rural Areas, in the Scottsville Magisterial District. The applicant has provided a well report prepared by C. R. Moore Well Drilling Company (Attachment D). The site is located to the south and adjacent to the Jurisdictional Area, for water only, that serves a small commercial area at the southeast portion of the 1-64/Rt. 250 East interchange, including the Ramada Inn (Attachment C). In December of 1985, the existing 75' well was drilled to a depth of 305' with no additional water being found. A pump was installed in this well to use water that was stored overnight. With the continuing dry weather, the well cannot support normal water usage. In January of 1986, a second well was drilled to a depth of 305' with no measurable flow. This second well has minimal overnight seepage and does not have enough flow to sustain a family or support a storage tank. The well driller's report has concluded that the wells in the surrounding area are marginal and cannot support more than one household. Furthermore, there is no other place on this property to drill a well due to the size of the lot, placement of the septic field, and the location of the reserve septic field. DISCUSSION: The subject property is located in the Rural Area. The Comprehensive provision of water and sewer service to the Rural Areas: Plan provides the following concerning the "General Principle: Urban Areas, Communities, and Villages are to be served by public water and sewer (p. 109)." "Provide water and sewer service only to areas within the ACSA Jurisdictional Areas (p. 125)." "Follow the boundaries of the designated Development Areas in delineating Jurisdictional Areas (p.125)." "Only allow changes in the jurisdictional areas outside of the designated Development Areas in cases where the property is: 1) adjacent to existing lines; and 2) public health and/or safety are in danger (p.125)." The applicant has provided a well driller's report that supports the applicant's request for inclusion into the Jurisdictional Area for water only. This property, and surrounding residential properties, has a history of water problems. Four (4) properties to the north of this site are currently in the Jurisdictional Area (water only designation). Service to the site could be provided by a 16" water line that is installed on the east side of Route 250 East and runs to Glenmore. Also, the site could potentially be served by the fire protection line located in the back of the Ramada Inn. AGENDA TITLE: Phillip Hawkins -- Request to amend Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area September 4, 2002 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Due to the history of the site (and the immediate surrounding area) having water problems, the small acreage of the parcel, and the location of the primary and reserve septic fields, there are no other on-site alternatives for the location of a new well. Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve the request for water service only. Attachments: A - Application B - Location and Tax Map C - Jurisdictional Area D - Well Driller's Report 02.133 APPLICATION TO · ~RISDICTIONAI, ~AS ~=~w~:~ :...~ ::: ." 8~29~5~. . :.. ' · ' - · · "'"' ~P~~'~: ~ ~ _~, ~ . · . .. :.'....:...: .'. A~¢~ 'g 2'7/~~~'_.~=f~ ~. '" :"-'"'"i:'~':' ' .. ..: : · ... ~;.::,.. · : :. :.~,... · CO-APPLICANT No.~e (or agont, if any): JUI~SDiCTIONAL A_ILEA DESIGNATION P~t~STED: ~' Water and ~ewcr '~ 'Water. Only '. .. ' [] Wa~e£'On~y to E~is~ing.Stt'ucta~(s) [] Ljmi~d Se~ (De~rib~ i~ ]~fi~n .. b~ow), ': P~OPERTY LO~TiON ~Address) ~'0 ~/ '~r~ " ' .... '"~' ~ ,_._.. ,_,,_,,~...~~ ...... .. . .::...,~'~,.: ..,.: .. ~. ..... . -~.~"~. ~'~ ~-~'~ ~,~.'~/~. · .. . . .._.... _ ... · .:: :-.......... .. ~.~ .... .. ' ".. .... . . . . . · . . . .. :.. ~.~. ~ '...'.......-: ' ' ' '' ' ' ~ ..... ~'_L_'." '.' ' ". · I.DATESVBI?!?T~-D', .' .' ', , ..' .'. '...'. :. DA.TE $130 FEE PAID: ~~'.'::-j'!.i:[:'.:.':..':::::.,'~ · "/ PP~OPERTY't~ LOCATED (Check >/p~r6pv:~fi~'}' · .. · · '. ..... . "}':'" ...".' :'i'.?.c,'~.::.-;~::.r ~'::~':..[ · / . .... · . · .'.' ........ - ...... '..~ ..... ' :' '. · ' · .' · . · '..."',.'.'~':'..:".' !"-,~':;'.'::~.'.:)~::l'4'~.~t.'.. :. .' · '.' :" - "" ;"" '.'" "" · ; ' '"'. ' : ' '" .... · · ' · '~ " ' ' : ': .. :'. ;.'.:..' ~ ... ';.':':" *.{..::;:.Z! ' -f,i:_if~ -' . ~ ........'.El .Ins:de:or .~Outs]de aOmwthAma?. · · . .~ AdjacemtoSAJA? i....'.-....~;':::'.r=::7.t,.,:c:.] :,':.'>','..:.'. .. .... ...,...:...:. .....::....:...............: .:.. .. :,..., ...... ..........: ...... ,......., ... :.........::.,..,.,~.~?~,:::/:,.;:.::~.: .... .. ] ...:... I~t. Ins)de or..~].Ouf, s~d~%Water:Supply Waters:he.d, · [] .Adjacent.to a Grow~. Al:ea,.;:-.,~:j.:~, .:,].. ~-:r,t~:'.,.'- - .': "'l """,':..£" .'":.' ".- -'2 -" ~.'- . f' ":' ": - · ' .' :".: · '.'..' '.".' -":...' ." "' · . · . '.' . · : .' .-'" '.' ' i ' ...:..' "! ".:...'- ~,;ai;~.g:rj~r:i~t: 1~.',':~.~::...:¥:..~.~.. · ' .. :.]Loc_a~tgn.and dista_~,e of water,se?er line propo, sed.ta provtde servme '.." . .. '=...' ....'. ';.: .... '.:;.._-_-:.c?*r.~:.'.'~.::'[ '.-...:..=:;... ...... ' " ' '~-.~' "~I~"~":l'~"i ==. .'l ' ' '"-'";':'.'-" ; :'."& '< '.':" "' ''"' .... '" ". '.' ·" '' ~ ""1 " ' '~": '.' "'" .' "- .'"'"'" "x:'l .r'.~:.' .,~,~.~.', ~;',~ ;-4:,. , '.'.., ' '.. · '...-~.: -'..::,...'-':..:.....'--'.-.:.'...'-"..,.: ~.-':..'..<';'.~'. ,-~'.~'~,.','.;.,-','.< '.,-, ~ . ',.,:..'.'-.~.-~..'.'..,':'.:.....'.:'.,..'-~ ..... ~.'::.::,'"', .',',~,:?,~,, ~l,;;.-,~-:-< ' ~t ........... . --. . ' ----- ' ' -- ' "--=~--. .'.....~ :'~-t,'~',l" ' . .~ ~ l', ~'l~. ...., .:,......:?..... ..... :...... ,::..,...... · .-'.,. ~u~s~ ~O~-~~Nr ~o~o:':..':n. ¥;~ ~ ~o' .:~"of Xai~'~';'-.":' :'.'' '-: :': -,.,~;..,, ~ .~,....~:. .~i :.' '/.'. / :,.:'."~ ,'.;:.'....'::'. ~?.,.;.:-?:.!..:,'c::..:<.:.' :....-.....:.; ':-~:-!;-'.v,. ,. ~.;: .: ..:-.: ...... ~-~ ~,' ""'.. ""' :' '.'~ .';' '~'.: > .'" "' ' ."- ;.". "-. J',;:.-',~;/(¢~."4:'~-"] ~,~5. ', '. *' ~ '~ - ' . '" c'*.~ ~'~' '":' '~ ..... ~'<""~' '""" "'¥: ." ':'"' "~ :"~-" · ": .' ": . "~ .'"' , '"':.: '"' .... ' ';i ' .?'..N' :,.'...qr'q .%'~v2.11 '~':'.~-~,:''-' · ~ ................................ .-.~ ...... · ........ · .................... ' '. ..... ~-.' f4.;~,~,l--~' ~,.~-,,...'. " ' ' · -' -""' ':' ' ~'~-'. '~%".~ ".- ' " ....:. .' '. · ".' ' ' "'. "'' · ' · ' "..~~' ' "~'7;:''-'I .'~ ,Y'¥/.2'.~;...; · . · . .... , - .:.. ;.~ ............ : .. .=.,. · , . ....... ...'. ,.,:,;~,;;J,,:,.....I.,'.:::::..~,,,~,:~r~ .... : . . .'...' · ::":-.':'~" '..'['.'.' · '.' · : .... ' '.-'.- ,'..'.--.; ...: .' .. . · . ...... · ' ' ' :: .....:-. '-. · . :':. '* L!:":~i'~-.,,. ...... · ... . ."- ~,' .'.-' -... '~.. '..'.. · '. ..'...'..'. r ~ . . . · . '.. · .. .~:'.'~., · '.."f.. ~'....~ · ...:...,..: .....:.............:....:........ · .. .... .;,,. :~:.~: . ..::: .. :...... ,....., :. . ... ,,... .~.~...~.~..~-~__~._"~-' ..... i...~ . '. ._' , · , , · ,' ........... :-_-:--:-_ ..... ', ' · -t=: .... 2091 Ninth t-Ifil Charlotte~.'.'.lle, Va, 2:19l l ALBE.MAa~F_, COUI",FIW' PLANNING- DEPARTMENT COUNTY· OFFICE B~G CHARLOTTESVILLE VIKG-IlqIA RE' Appli~tion fi~'wat~ m~iee'to.Tax. Map. 7.8~'Patoel 43A, Gemle, m~: Tlmnk ycm far the ~p0mmit7 to adck~s t~ board_ My pm~ h,~.a history of'water.. shorta~ as.does.th, surrounding, prop~:ie,-~ Th~ hour~ was. buik N~ !~'s on .53 ~g ~ ~ (2) w~s. ~ ~~ flow ~:p.m). ~e ~u'a d~h W~ m~ a a ~s~, A s~d wM1 was dffiled ~d wa ~. N~ ~ ~ ~ not. ~low.~o~h wa~; ov~ m ~l-~ ~E. I ~ve ~ m ~ ~ pu~ ~= p~-~e-we~ ~ ~ ~ng up ~ pump, Drill~ng anoth~' w~ll or tapping into a neighbor's well is not a solution. The .aquifer e~m.'not supply, the amount, or quality, ofw~t~.:n~ded. My. neighbor, Ta~.Ma~ 7$.P~eel' 3 5, ~ .two wells and both m dry and 'th~m%r~'is a A.C.S.A. cu~iomer. My l~ml~rty i, ma tl~ d~'ive~vay oft~/urisdi~ionat'Area, TI~ A.C.S:~ wa~er liae i~.atde~e ogd of my rkiveway', Th~nef0te. I testy r~tim~t- th_,?_, exm~ideration.be giv~'for.rt~, in~iU~iott irao Lt,.I nTTAC, H~i~. B ,/ -.,eL-:'. , ,. l~ '-l,: ~.. :.~: ', '.,. ",-~. ,. I : I ~l l'' l~-. --' ', ~ I"'-"-- ...... ' Al. bemarle County Service Authority~ , · . J'u'risdi'¢~io.nai Areas.. MAP'. '.' L'EGEND WATER ONLY WATER AND SEWE.R WATER ONLY TO EXISTING STRUCTURES . [Please se~ %is1' of .Existing Structures OR D~velopment i~ighfs." for specific structures.and dates.] LIMITED SERVICE .[.PLEASE SEE "Ust of Existing Struclures OR Development · R!ghts" for specific Irmitations,] "iSED:8.,,r'I 1i9,8, 3,'rl'4,"01, 3t27/'0'1 ALBEMARLE OOUNTY ....../\ 2~38 PcrC~0ND ROAD 3m~J~OrmSwcu}, v^. 2o~traclob L~om. ~0344~ . C. R. Moore' Well Drilling Company, Inc. 229It-7999' Vrno~m: 434-'977~'38'i & F~c~:: 434.4 ' July 16, 2002 'I ,- ·: TO mom [t May Concern: 'Th, parpo~ r>f this let~r is ~ a~r~s the w~ a[~tion at 2~91 No~ Hill, ~lo~svitl~ Vkg~i~. T~ pm~ i~ ~a~d in T~ ~ p~ml 7~43~ ~ ~o (2) wd~ ~ a h~ ]ot.~ ~ei~r w~l &throe ~6d~ five 0~5)'¢~ ~ De~b~, 1985. No ~ w~ fo~d at ~m ~. A p~ W~, , ins~le~.i~t.the fi~t wall, ming on~y ~ mmtur~ sWmgo ~,~ e~me iu ovemigh/ A, a r~ulf~f ~'d~ w~, ~ ~ount. or'm~ ~.~ed coa~i~. ~ well will ab Bng~ su~'a fmrly~h ao'ma'l~a~,n~is~omu~ flow ~ su~o~astoragetmtk. ' . ~ .'. : On Janaacy 3, 1986., a s~0nd w~ll was cki~l~ ,o a d~ of~ hun~ five 005) f~t, wi~ na · · Thy w~lls in ~ sun-9.' urxt~-rtg arvO at~ margirtal and ca~ot ~upp0rt m~r~ fl~ or~ homeh0Td. There~'6i~'. ~ng ial~ a ~¢ighbor~o wal~r sapply is ~mt an Ol:Cdon. There is no ofher place on the'pmpet~ t9 g_,q_tl ~'well. 7ad,r · Atlaeh~ please fi~l. the two (2) logs tot lhe wefts drilbd on the pr6pe~;y. Should you hav~ any additJoaal qne~orts, plea.se f~e_J free t~ cora~a~ me. · L~y L. Moore lirer~dent When you think of water, think C. R. Moore! Owner Q~ROTHyCRENSHAW ~1 CQrnmonwealth of Virginia Uniform W~r Well Completion F~port L.DUa/JOi~ 114 MILE EASTOF R.T. 2.50 AND 154 MILE NORTH'OF RT. 64 (SHERATON Ir,IN) D. RI.LLED THIS WELL t;R1:31~"75' TO 31~ C_~ner~1 Informatl~rl Dept~ ~ ~k 8~c Wa~r Le~e~ F~ ~ ~ To Wal~ ~dule Pm To ~e H~e Sl~ T~ ......... Fm' To M~hS~ N/A' ' Diem Bore Hole Size T~e Methnd- Fl'Od'n Weft Data Ma~h Size Date C~rrgoleted · 12/20/198,5 Yield S'~abillzed Water Level Disin f~c'ta~t Used Fram Ta ~ze Mateda. ls' Weight ,.%h~dule (3PM To Fl~m Bore Hole 81ze. Type 'FO "Uge Dala* Map ID 78-43A VDH.PermI~ VWCB Pe.rm~ VWCB tD ~u~ty' ALBEMARLE Tolal Depth of WsH 305 Natural F~ow Amount U~:I From To Slze 'Meier[ars We_J~h t ~hedule To To Mesh Siz~ T,3 privale Well: Dome~tiu' Pub!re We~l; Corem unity Agricu~ ral Indusb'Jat Nc~t Cornmunib/ · ' M~n[todn9 F~-om *Abar~donmsnt I'nformation' ..We~s other th~ Bored Wells C~ng m~ Y or N? To G~u~: From To. *Drillers Loci° [j~p~h [~scrip§en. of i:orrn~tior~ er 8edfment 75 - 305 .GREENSTONE F~rr~Rrk8 N,~r,e C. FL 'Moore Well Drilling Ce., Inc. A~dre~s. 2258 RJchmon~l..R0ad Charlottesville, Va. 2291 ~ ce~i~ ~ ~e in~Fma6on ~nfalned he~ is ~e ~ ~at thi~ well w~ In.lied ~d ~n~E~ i~' a~rdan6e wi~ ~e ~emit. 8~d ~dh~'that.the ~[I ~pli~ ~th aE appri~able s~ and 3o~1 ~pmsemi~ C.R. Mo~e Well DrBing ~. Inc. ~J~mni~ Cr-0nb'molors Licen6e Nm. re]her 00340(] Commor~eaKh of VirgUle Uniform W~ter Well Completi~ Report Owner DOROTHY CRE.klSHAW #2 Addr~$~. -- · · . LocationS0O FEET NORTH OF250 AND 3.50 ~=]~ET WEST OF QUALITY INN RT, 250 Tax Map ID · VDH Pan-nit vWCB Petml~: ' VWCB [D GenerBI I Drr;llng MaCk, od A.R_ Depth to ~dt6ck Well Di~nl~-~d Ca~n~ From + ~. To 67 $1z$ · 6 1/4- [Matad~l PVO Weight E, ohedule GraYei Pack Frorrl ' r~A Grout From .. ~ Bore Hole Type Methb(!. Water Zones or Screened IAfervale Fmrn To Mesh Siz~ Well Data Data Comlala[~ad I/3~1966 Y~eld 0 Stabll~..ed Water Level Dis~"~--'t ant Meat[ GPM C~n~ ALBEMAFU..E Total DePth of Well ~05' Lengb~ of Te~t Natural Amount I.,~ed F;rl3m 81ze Weight Schedule To To Mated~ls FTOrtl From To ' Size Ma~er~als Weighl Schedule To Fr~rA From To Bore'Hole Size Type Me, had Fl'~m Mesh Size From Bore HaJ~ Type Method TO F[om Me~ Size· To Pdvate Well: Public We~l: Ag~culeurel Non Community Industrial Moni~c~n9 . . *Abandonment'Information* Bc~'~d ar Dui~.INetl6 Casing F{emov~, Y or N. "If Y, Dep{h ~ ~J~ CBSiAO ~ removed: B~o~e plu~;From To From To. Wells oiher than Bc-re,d Wells Ca~lng removed Y or N? [fY, Depth.tO w~l~ch casing Ft~;~ ~moved If appi[cabha, depth I[s), a[!.d l~e of gra. ve-lt'sagd fill; SOUrCe of ~r,~al or gaud: ·. , G~:~uti rig: From To · ~llle,rs Loa* Deplh 0 - 18 RED DiRT · t@ - 6B' BROWN DIRT 66 - 3D5' GR~ENSTONE Description of Formation or Sedlmenl:' Rem~rk~ U~r~e C. Ft.'Moore. Well Dr[IJing Ce., .[nc. ~dress 2238 Richmond Road CharloEes'vitle, Va, 22911 m ~ ~ ~e ih~ation ~n~i6~d here ~ t~e ~d ~( thm~ ~mm ~ 4~s~m~d ~d ~n~u~(~ )n acco~an~.~ith ~e peril ~ fu~heF t~ (he ~m ¢o~pmie~ wi~ ~mm ~ppu&abme state ~ io~m F~um~uon~r o~)~n~8 and ma~, ~rimm~ $~n~tur~ ' RoN~mE E~m0~ Date ~pmsentmng C. ~+ ~00~ wemm Dr(lling Co, mnc, VicBini~ garrtra~ Lf~em~ Num[~r 00'34~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Proposed FY 2003 Budget Amendment SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Public Hearing on the Proposed FY 2002/03 Budget Amendment in the amount of $16,466,233.77, and request approval of the amendment and of Appropriations #2003005, 2003006, 2003007, 2003008, 2003009 and 2003010 to provide funds for various General Government, Capital Improvement, and School programs. STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Hildebeidel; Ms. White AGENDA DATE: September 4, 2002 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: X INFORMATION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes REVIEWED BY: INFORMATION: BACKGROUND: The Code of Virginia {}15.2-2507 stipulates that any locality may amend its budget to adjust the aggregate amount to be appropriated during the current fiscal year as shown in the currently adopted budget. However, any such amendment which exceeds one percent of the total expenditures shown in the currently adopted budget or the sum of $500,000, whichever is lesser, must be accomplished by first publishing a notice of a meeting and holding a public hearing before amending the budget. The Code section applies to all County funds, i.e, General Fund, Capital Funds, E-911, School Self-Sustaining, etc. DISCUSSION: This proposed FY 2003 Budget Amendment totals $16,466,233.77. included in the proposed amendment are shown below: The estimated expenses and revenues ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES General Government (General Fund) Administration $ Public Safety Engineering/Public Works Human Development Parks, Recreation & Culture Community Development Total, General Gov't $ 38 004.40 72 642.15 76 866.52 12 490.78 13 961.22 298 254.58 512.219.65 School Fund $ 10,000.00 Capital Improvement Funds Education (Schools) General Government Storm Water Improvements ECC - Capital Projects Total, Capital Expenditures $ 4,804,089.57 9,652,769.15 1,167,726.45 319,428.95 $15,944,014.12 TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES- All Funds $16,466,233.77 ESTIMATED REVENUES General Government (General Fund) Fund Balances $ 512,219.65 SchoolFund Federal Revenues $ 10,000.00 Capital Improvement Funds Education (Schools) Fund Balances $ 4,804,089.57 General Government Local Revenues State Revenues Fund Balances 14,775.90 54,150.33 9,583,842.92 Storm Waterlmprovements Local Revenues State Revenues Fund Balances $ 10,000.00 100,000.00 1,057,726.45 ECC - Capital Pr~ects Local Revenues $ 319,428.95 RECAP Local Revenues State Revenues Federal Revenues Fund Balances $ 344,204.85 154,150.33 10,000.00 15,957,878.59 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES -All Funds $16,466,233.77 This budget amendment consists of six appropriations, which will need to be approved by the Board after the public hearing. A detailed description of the six appropriations is provided on Attachment A. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the FY 2003 Budget Amendment in the amount of $16,466,233.77, after the public hearing and approval of Appropriations #2003005, 2003006, 2003007, 2003008, 2003009 and 2003010 to provide funds for various General Government, Capital Improvement, and School programs. 02.131 Appropriation #2003005 Attachment A $ 4,804,089.57 School Capital Improvements Projects: The following ongoing School Capital Improvement Fund projects have project balances requiring re-appropriation from FY 2002 into FY 2003: School Board - ADA Structural Changes Brownsville Elementary School Crozet Elementary School Greet Elementary School Stony Point Elementary School Baker-Butler Elementary School Southern Elementary School Burley Middle School Jack Jouett Middle School Walton Middle School Albemarle High School Murray High School Monticello High School C.A.T.E.C. Vehicle Maintenance Facility Class/Instruction - ADP Equipment Class/Instruction - Technology Grant $ 169,729.78 87,679.50 69,098.58 19,317.27 18,996.69 1,222,691.25 1,185,000.00 1,789,790.36 81,826.37 23,602.07 4,193.98 8,683.50 9,415.88 8,772.34 4,957.50 100,305.58 28.92 Appropriation #2003006 $ 512,219.65 General Fund Outstanding Purchase Orders: Several departments had funding for projects approved in FY 2002 that had not been completed as of June 30, 2002. This appropriation will re-appropriate the remaining balances for the following uncompleted projects for which purchase orders were outstanding as of June 30, 2002: Management & Budget Telecommunications Carpet Replacement QUIP - Training $ 1,839.20 2,447.00 25,000.00 $ 29,286.20 Finance Building Renovations Professional Services Office Supplies $ 2,481.00 3,100.00 3,137.20 $ 8,718.20 Fire/Rescue - Administration Motor Vehicles $ 27,207.00 $ 27,207.00 Fire/Rescue - Training Merch. for Resale $ 822.00 822.00 Fire/Rescue - Operations Medical/Lab Supplies Uniforms Veh. & Equip. Repairs Motor Vehicles $ 2,098.19 3,358.14 8,579.20 27,107.00 $ 41,142.53 Volunteer Fire Department Mach. & Equipment Engineering & Public Works Prof. Services Consult. Maint.-Detention Basin Groundwater Study Automart Soil/Erosion Solid Waste Contract-Keene Landfill Curbside Recycling Public Works - Maintenance Maint. Contract-Building Motor Vehicle - Repl. Social Services - Management Contract Services Social Services - Benefits F.S. Issuance - Contract Social Services - Employment Services Books & Subscriptions Parks & Recreation - Summer Swim Lease & Rentals Parks & Recreation -Athletics Repair & Maint. Supplies Parks & Recreation - Community Centers Repair & Maint. Supplies Parks & Recreation - Special Activities Educ. & Recreation Sup. Gypsy Moth Contract Services Planning and Community Development Prof. Set. Consultants Development Area Study Fum. & Fixtures-Repl. Contract Services Print & Bind - External E911 / Planning Aerial Photography Travel- Education $ 3,470.62 $ 11,313.04 2,505.00 325.35 387.70 $ 36,610.00 9,702.57 $ 441.00 15,581.86 $ 2,290.00 $ 9,819.87 $ 380.91 $ 225.00 $ 547.20 $ 630.00 $ 2,566.02 $ 9,993.00 $ 8,511.83 217,787.96 169.99 253.00 92.00 $ 71,043.00 396.80 $ 3,470.62 $ 14,531.09 $ 46,312.57 $ 16,022.86 $ 2,290.00 $ 9,819.87 $ 380.91 $ 225.00 $ 547.20 $ 630.00 $ 2,566.02 $ 9,993.00 $226,814.78 $ 71,439.80 Appropriation #2003007 $9,652,769.15 General Government Capital Improvements Projects: The following General Government Capital Improvements Fund projects, many of which are multi-year, have project balances requiring re- appropriation from FY 2002 into FY 2003: Finance Assessment System $ 19,073.20 Courts Space Study Repairs and Maintenance Renovations $117,201.13 61,070.66 554,992.08 $ 733,263.87 District Court - Machinery & Equipment $ 5,000.00 Juvenile Court - Repairs & Maintenance $ 42,554.19 Clerk of the Court- Imaging System $ 8,537.00 Public Safety Radio System CAD Video Equipment Training/Firing Range Public Safety Facility Emergency Communications Center Fire/Rescue Buildings & Equipment Records Management System Incident Reporting System Engineering Consultants Ivy Landfill Sidewalk Improvement Street Lights North Berkshire Meadowcreek Pkwy-Eng. Keene Landfill Meadowcreek Path Ivy Road Barracks Road Sidewalks Meadowcreek Pkwy-Phase I Corville Farm Improvements Street Improvement Landscaping - 29 North Avon Street/Route 20 Wakefield Road Revenue Sharing Roads Airport Road Sidewalks $760,154.00 124,364.58 6,189.57 40,000.00 14,795.57 $1,428,526.42 18,503.64 25,000.00 $ 10,400.00 446,000.00 505,420.50 116,929.21 3,079.00 24,275.41 368,872.80 20,000.00 51,667.00 5,550.25 15,196.27 9,400.00 $ 74,251.75 407.00 22,162.00 473,176.90 127,000.00 $ 945,503.72 $ 3,677.03 $1,472,030.06 $1,576,790.44 $ 696,997.65 Public Works Facility Maintenance COB - Chillers Storage Tanks Parking Lot Board Room Renovations Human Resources Dept. Renov. Development Dept. Renovations Entry Corridor Polling Sites $ 330,300.05 6,646.25 2,471.45 1,000.00 55,060.50 7,178.26 50,000.00 77,500.00 18,908.00 $ 549,064.51 Parks and Recreation ADA Changes Maintenance Projects Miscellaneous Projects Crozet Park Scottsville Center Towe Park Athletic Fields Development Southern Park Ivy Landfill PVCC Facility Simpson Park Athletic Fields Irrigation 23 623.97 37.204.68 50.000.00 15.639.39 28.361.65 73.590.18 108.950.49 28.383.12 14.614.28 93.000.00 72,109.71 41,088.35 $ 586,565.82 Tourism Related Visitor's Bureau Rivanna Greenway Route 250/616 Ivy Bike Lanes River Access Boat Access Free Bridge Court Square $ 8,700.00 81,550.00 110,000.00 5,500.00 30,000.00 369,745.50 15,000.00 250,000.00 $ 870,495.50 Libraries ADP Equipment Maintenance Projects North Library New Library Contingency 95,000.00 100,704.83 4,223.10 500.00 58,883.00 $ 259,310.93 Planning A.C.E. Neighborhood Plan Greenbriar Ped./Bike Transportation Planning Parcel Conversion Project (G.I.S.) $1,135,760.60 455,744.78 75,000.00 100,000.00 117,399.85 $1,883,905.23 Appropriation #2003008 $1,167,726.45 Storm Water Capital Improvements Projects: The following ongoing Storm Water Capital Improvements Fund projects have project balances requiring re-appropriation from FY 2002 into FY 2003: Westmoreland Court BirnamNVynridge Basin Woodbrook Channel Ivy Road Drainage Ricky Road Engineering 6,555.28 401,188.73 26,505.00 80,000.00 90,560.66 562,916.78 Appropriation #2003009 $ 319,428.95 ECC - Capital Projects: The C.A.D. System is an Emergency Communications Center project funded jointly by the County, City of Charlottesville, and University of Virginia. This appropriation will re- appropriate the available balance for this uncompleted project. Appropriation #2003010 $10,000.00 School Funds from Air Force Junior ROTC: Monticello High School received funds in the amount of $10,000.00 from the Air Force Junior ROTC. These funds will be used for operational start-up costs to purchase a TV, Laptop, Printer and a Projector. FMS21 I COUN~ OF ALBEMARLE APP # 2003 00,~ REVISED 6~84 APPROPRIATION DATE 08/1512002 BATCH NUMBER EXPLANATION: REAPPROPRIATION OF UNCOMPLETED SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. SUB. LEDGER GENERAL LEDGER TYPE FUNE DEPT OBJECT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODE AMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 1 9000 60100 800665 SCHOOL BOARD ADA J 1 169,729.78 1 9000 60202 800901 BROWNSVILLE BUILDING RENO J 1 87,679.50 1 9000 60203 800605 CROZET CONSTRUCTION J 1 13,002.34 1 9000 60203 800652 CROZET KITCHEN RENO J 1 56,096.24 1 9000 60204 800673 GREER HVAC IMPROV J 1 19,317.27 1 9000 60211 800987 STONY POINT PARKING/PLAYGR J 1 18,996.69 1 9000 60217 312350 BAKER-BUTLER ENG/PLANNING J 1 70,640.70 1 9000 60217 580000 BAKER-BUTLER MISC EXPENSES J 1 24,958.00 1 9000 60217 800120 BAKER-BUTLER EQUIP/MATERIALS J 1 17,883.15 1 9000 60217 800200 BAKER-BUTLER FURN & FIXTURES J 1 309,000.00 1 9000 60217 800630 BAKER-BUTLER SITE PREPARATION J 1 59,129.00 1 9000 60217 800650 BAKER-BUTLER CONSTRUCTION J 1 581,548.40 1 9000 60217 800670 BAKER-BUTLER UTILITIES J 1 34,421.80 1 9000 60217 800700 BAKER-BUTLER ADP EQUIPMENT J 1 94,149.79 1 9000 60217 800750 BAKER-BUTLER PURC OF LAND J 1 3,211.61 1 9000 60217 950129 BAKER-BUTLER POWELL CREEK J 1 27,748.80 1 9000 60218 312350 SOUTHERN ELEM ENG/PLANNING J 1 20,000.00 1 9000 60251 800901 BURLEY BUILDING RENO J 1 1,789,790.36 1 9000 60253 800901 JOUETT BUILDING RENO J 1 81,826.37 1 9000 60253 800901 JOUETT BUILDING RENO J 1 1,165,000.00 1 9000 60254 800901 WALTON BUILDING RENO J 1 23,602.07 1 9000 60301 800605 ALBEMARLE CONSTRUCTION J 1 4,193.98 1 9000 60303 800901 MURRAY BUILDING RENO J 1 8,683.50 1 9000 60304 312350 MONTICELLO ENG/PLANNING J 1 3,568.85 1 9000 60304 800120 MONTICELLO EQUIP/MATERIALS J 1 5,847.03 1 9000 60410 800665 C.A.T.E.C ADA J 1 8,772.34 1 9000 60510 800901 VEHICLE MAINT BUILDING RENO J 1 4,957.50 1 9000 61101 800700 CLASS/INSTRUC ADP EQUIPMENT J 1 100,305.58 1 9000 61101 800707 CLASS/INSTRUC TECHNOLGYGRANT J 1 28.92 2 9000 51000 510100 TRANSFERS FUND BALANCE J 2 4,804,089.57 9000 0501 EST REVENUE 4,804,089.57 9000 0701 APPROPRIATION 4,804,089.57 TOTAL 9,608,179.14 4,804,089.57 4,804,089.57 I PREPARED BY: MELVIN BREEDEN DATE: 0811512002 BD. OF SUPV. APPROVAL: ELLA W. CAREY DATE: 0910412002 ACCT. APPROVAL: DATE: ENTERED BY: I DATE: FMS2 I COUN~ OF ALBEMARLE APP # 2003 006 REVISED 6/84 APPROPRIATION DATE 08/15/2002 BATCH NUMBER EXPLANATION: REAPPROPRIATION OF ITEMS AND SERVICES FOR WHICH PURCHASE ORDERS WERE OUTSTANDING AS OF JUNE 30, 2002. SUB. LEDGER GENERAL LEDGER TYPE FUND DEPT OBJEC3 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODEAMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 1 1000 12015 312390 MANGEMENT& BUDGET J 1 25,000.00 1 1000 12015 520300 MANGEMENT& BUDGET J 1 1,839.20 1 1000 12015 800663 MANGEMENT& BUDGET J 1 2,447.00 1 1000 12141 310000 FINANCE J 1 3,100.00 1 1000 12141 800901 FINANCE J 1 2,481.00 1 1000 12142 600100 FINANCE J 1 1,757.80 1 1000 12142 600100 FINANCE J 1 1,379.40 1 1000 32011 800500 FIRE RESCUE J 1 27,207.00 1 1000 32012 601500 FIRE RESCUE J 1 822.00 1 1000 32015 600400 FIRE RESCUE J 1 1,201.00 1 1000 32015 600400 FIRE RESCUE J 1 300.19 1 1000 32015 600400 FIRE RESCUE J 1 597.00 1 1000 32015 600900 FIRE RESCUE J 1 8,579.20 1 1000 32015 601100 FIRE RESCUE J 1 1,020.14 1 1000 32015 601100 FIRE RESCUE J 1 2,338.00 1 1000 32015 800500 FIRE RESCUE J 1 27,107.00 1 1000 32020 800100 VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT J 1 3,470.62 1 1000 41000 312341 ENGINEERING J 1 325.35 1 1000 41000 312700 ENGINEERING J 1 995.50 1 1000 41000 312700 ENGINEERING J 1 9,847.54 1 1000 41000 312700 ENGINEERING J 1 470.00 1 1000 41000 331901 ENGINEERING J 1 2,000.00 1 1000 41000 331901 ENGINEERING J 1 505.00 1 1000 41000 950023 ENGINEERING J 1 387.70 1 1000 42040 390001 SOLID WASTE / RECYCLING J 1 22,937.00 1 1000 42040 390001 SOLID WASTE / RECYCLING J 1 12,320.00 1 1000 42040 390001 SOLID WASTE / RECYCLING J 1 1,353.00 1 1000 42040 390010 SOLID WASTE / RECYCLING J 1 9,702.57 1 1000 43002 332200 PUBLIC WORKS J 1 441.00 1 1000 43002 800501 PUBLIC WORKS J 1 15,581.86 1 1000 53011 312210 VA. PUBLIC ASSISTANCE J 1 2,290.00 1 1000 53012 301212 VA. PUBLICASSlSTANCE J 1 9,819.87 1 1000 53014 601200 VA. PUBLIC ASSISTANCE J 1 380.91 1 1000 71013 540000 PARKS & RECREATION J 1 180.00 1 1000 71013 540000 PARKS & RECREATION J 1 45.00 1 1000 71014 600700 PARKS & RECREATION J 1 547.20 1 1000 71015 540000 PARKS & RECREATION J 1 630.00 1 1000 71016 601300 PARKS & RECREATION J 1 2,566.02 1 1000 71031 312210 GYPSY MOTH PROGRAM J 1 9,993.00 1 1000 81010 301210 PLANNING J 1 253.00 1 1000 81010 312342 PLANNING J 1 4,922.96 1 1000 81010 312342 PLANNING J 1 191,265.00 1 1000 81010 312342 PLANNING J 1 21,600.00 1 1000 81010 312700 PLANNING J 1 5,400.00 1 1000 81010 312700 PLANNING J 1 3,111.83 1 1000 81010 350000 PLANNING J 1 92.00 1 1000 81010 800201 PLANNING J 1 169.99 1 1000 81017 312385 E-911 / PLANNING J 1 71,043.00 1 1000 81017 550400 E-911 / PLANNING J 1 396.80 2 1000 51000 510100 G/F BALANCE J 2 512,219.65 1000 0501 EST REVENUE 512,219.65 1000 0701 APPROPRIATION 512,219.65 TOTAL 1,024,439.30 512,219.65 512,219.65 I PREPARED BY: MELVIN BREEDEN DATE: 08/15/2002 BD. OF SUPV. APPROVAL: ELLA W. CAREY DATE: 09/04/2002 ACCT. APPROVAL: DATE: ENTERED BY: DATE: FMS2 I COUNT~ OF AEBEMAREE APP # 2003 007 REVISED 6~84 APPROPRIATION DATE 08/1512002 BATCH NUMBER EXPLANATION: REAPPROPRIATION OF UNCOMPLETED GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS. SUB. LEDGER GENERAL LEDGER TYPE FUND DEPT OBJECT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODI~ AMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 1 9010 11010 999979 BD OF SUPV RESERVE J 1 5,573,744.42 1 9010 12140 950004 FINANCE ASSESS SYS J 1 19,073.20 1 9010 21000 312343 COURTS SPACE STUDY J 1 117,201.13 1 9010 21000 331000 COURTS REPAIRS & MAINT J 1 61,070.66 1 9010 21000 800901 COURTS RENOVATIONS J 1 554,992.08 1 9010 21020 800100 DIST COURT MAC & EQUIP J 1 5,000.00 1 9010 21050 331000 JUV COURT REPAIRS & MAINT J 1 42,554.19 1 9010 21060 800708 CLK. COURT IMAGING SYSTEM J 1 8,537.00 1 9010 31000 800305 PUB SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM J 1 760,154.00 1 9010 31000 800306 PUB SAFETY COMP. AIDED DISP J 1 124,364.58 1 9010 31000 800733 PUB SAFETY VIDEO EQUIP J 1 6,189.57 1 9010 31000 800910 PUB SAFETY TRG/FIRING RNG J 1 40,000.00 1 9010 31000 800915 PUB SAFETY PUB SAFETY FAC J 1 14,795.57 1 9010 31040 800650 ECC BUILDINGS-CONST J 1 3,677.03 1 9010 32010 950092 FIRE/RESCUE BLDG & EQUIP J 1 1,428,526.42 1 9010 32010 950110 FIRE/RESCUE RECORDS MGT J 1 18,503.64 1 9010 32010 950140 FIRE/RESCUE INCIDENT REPORT J 1 25,000.00 1 9010 41000 312700 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS J 1 10,400.00 1 9010 41000 700006 ENGINEERING IVY LANDFILL J 1 446,000.00 1 9010 41000 800690 ENGINEERING SIDEWALK IMPR J 1 505,420.50 1 9010 41000 800960 ENGINEERING STREET LIGHTS J 1 116,929.21 1 9010 41000 950035 ENGINEERING N. BERKSHIRE J 1 3,079.00 1 9010 41000 950039 ENGINEERING M. PARKWAY J 1 24,275.41 1 9010 41000 950059 ENGINEERING KEENE LANDFILL J 1 368,872.80 1 9010 41000 950061 ENGINEERING M.CREEK PATH J 1 20,000.00 1 9010 41000 950090 ENGINEERING IVY ROAD J 1 51,667.00 1 9010 41000 950091 ENGINEERING BKS RD SIDEWALI~ J 1 5,550.25 1 9010 41000 950116 ENGINEERING M. CR PKWAY PHS J 1 15,196.27 1 9010 41000 950143 ENGINEERING CORVILLE FARM J 1 9,400.00 1 9010 41020 950024 STREETS LANDSC-29 NORTH J 1 74,251.75 1 9010 41020 950051 STREETS AVON ST/20 J 1 407.00 1 9010 41020 950068 STREETS WAKEFIELD ROAD J 1 22,162.00 1 9010 41020 950081 STREETS REVSHARING J 1 473,176.90 1 9010 41020 950115 STREETS A. RD SIDEWALKS J 1 127,000.00 1 9010 43100 800666 PUB WRKS FACILITY MAINT. J 1 330,300.05 1 9010 43100 800687 PUB WRKS COB- CHILLERS J 1 6,646.25 1 9010 43100 950042 PUB WRKS STORAGE TANKS J 1 2,471.45 1 9010 43100 950102 PUB WRKS PARKING LOT J 1 1,000.00 1 9010 43100 950119 PUB WRKS BOARD RM. J 1 55,060.50 1 9010 43100 950123 PUB WRKS H/R RENOV J 1 7,178.26 1 9010 43100 950127 PUB WRKS DEV'L. RENO J 1 50,000.00 1 9010 43100 950128 PUB WRKS ENTRY CORRIDOR J 1 77,500.00 1 9010 43100 950142 PUB WRKS POLLING SITES J 1 18,908.00 1 9010 71000 800665 PARKS & REC ADA CHANGES J 1 19,549.97 1 9010 71000 800668 PARKS & REC ADA CHANGES J 1 4,074.00 1 9010 71000 800949 PARKS & REC MAINT PROJECTS J 1 37,204.68 1 9010 71000 950000 PARKS & REC MISC PROJECTS J 1 50,000.00 1 9010 71000 950003 PARKS & REC CROZET PARK J 1 15,639.39 1 9010 71000 950009 PARKS & REC SCOTTSV CENTER J 1 28,361.65 I 9010 71000 950034 PARKS & REC TOWE PARK J I 73,590.18 1 9010 71000 950044 PARKS & REC ATH. FIELD J 1 108,950.49 1 9010 71000 950050 PARKS & REC SOUTHERN PARK J 1 28,383.12 1 9010 71000 950064 PARKS & REC IVY LANDFILL J 1 14,614.28 1 9010 71000 950069 PARKS & REC PVCC FACILITY J 1 93,000.00 1 9010 71000 950121 PARKS & REC SIMPSON PARK J 1 72,109.71 1 9010 71000 950137 PARKS & REC IRRIGATION J 1 29,088.35 1 9010 71000 950138 PARKS & REC IRRIGAT-TOWE PK J 1 12,000.00 1 9010 72030 568901 TOURISM VISITOR'S BUREAI.J J 1 8,700.00 1 9010 72030 950026 TOURISM RIV GREENWAY J 1 81,550.00 1 9010 72030 950055 TOURISM RT 250/616 J 1 110,000.00 1 9010 72030 950056 TOURISM IVY BIKE LANES J 1 5,500.00 1 9010 72030 950107 TOURISM RIVER ACCESS J 1 30,000.00 1 9010 72030 950111 TOURISM BOATACCESS J 1 369,745.50 1 9010 72030 950112 TOURISM FREE BRIDGE J 1 15,000.00 1 9010 72030 950135 TOURISM COURT SQUARE J 1 250,000.00 1 9010 73020 800700 LIBRARIES ADP EQUIPMENT J 1 95,000.00 1 9010 73020 800949 LIBRARIES MAINT PROJ J 1 100,704.83 1 9010 73020 950076 LIBRARIES NORTH LIBRARY J 1 4,223.10 1 9010 73020 950114 LIBRARIES NEW LIBRARY J 1 500.00 1 9010 73020 999999 LIBRARIES CONTINGENCY J 1 58,883.00 1 9010 81010 580409 PLANNING A.C.E. J 1 1,135,760.60 1 9010 81010 950053 PLANNING N'BORHOOD PLAN J 1 455,744.78 1 9010 81010 950108 PLANNING G'BRIAR PED./BIKE J 1 75,000.00 1 9010 81010 950136 PLANNING TRANS PLANNING J 1 100,000.00 1 9010 81010 950139 PLANNING PARCEL CONVERS J 1 117,399.85 2 9010 16000 160531 CHARGES FORCITY-TOWE PARK J 2 8,000.00 2 9010 18000 189916 MISCELLANEO~CHAMBER OF COM J 2 6,775.90 2 9010 24000 240231 CATEGORICAL DEPT.OFTRANSP J 2 54,150.33 2 9010 51000 510100 TRANSFERS FUND BALANCE J 2 15,033,222.76 2 9010 51000 512023 TRANSFERS TRS. FR.-E911 J 2 124,364.58 9010 0501 EST. REVENUE 15,226,513.57 9010 0701 APPROPRIATION 15,226,513.57 TOTAL 30,453,027.14 15,226,513.57 15,226,513.57 I PREPARED BY: MELVIN BREEDEN DATE: 08/15/2002 BD. OF SUPV. APPROVAL: ELLA W. CAREY DATE: 09~04~2002 ACCT. APPROVAL: I I DATE: FMS2 / COUN~ OF ALBEMARLE APP # 2003 00~ REVISED 6~84 APPROPRIATION DATE 08/1512002 BATCH NUMBER EXPLANATION: REAPPROPRIATION OF UNCOMPLETED STORM WATER CAPITAL PROJECTS. SUB. LEDGER GENERAL LEDGER TYPE FUND DEPT OBJECI ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODE AMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 1 9100 41057 800975 WESTMORELAND CRT J 1 6,555.28 1 9100 41036 312400 BIRNAM/WYNRIDGE BASIN J 1 8,391.45 1 9100 41049 800975 WOODBROOK CHANNEL J 1 26,505.00 1 9100 41036 800975 BIRNAM/WYNRIDGE BASIN J 1 51,147.28 1 9100 41037 800975 IVY ROAD DRAINAGE J 1 80,000.00 1 9100 41054 800975 RICKY ROAD J 1 90,560.66 1 9100 41000 950093 ENGINEERING J 1 237,407.72 1 9100 41000 800975 ENGINEERING J 1 325,509.06 1 9100 41036 800750 BIRNAM/WYNRIDGE BASIN J 1 341,650.00 2 9100 16000 160502 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE J 2 10,000.00 2 9100 24000 240540 DEPT OF CONS&RECREAT J 2 100,000.00 2 9100 51000 510100 FUND BALANCE J 2 1,057,726.45 9100 0501 EST REVENUE J 1,167,726.45 9100 0701 APPROPRIATION J 1,167,726.45 J J J J J J J J J J J J TOTAL 2,335,452.90 1,167,726.45 1,167,726.45 PREPARED BY: MELVIN BREEDEN DATE: 08/15/2002 BD. OF SUPV. APPROVAL: ELLA W. CAREY DATE: 09104102 ACCT. APPROVAL: DATE: ENTERED BY: DATE: FMS2 I COUN~ OF AEBEMAREE APP # 2003 00c. REVISED 6/84 APPROPRIATION DATE 08/16/2002 BATCH NUMBER EXPLANATION: REAPPROPRIATION OF COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH PROJECT. SUB. LEDGER GENERAL LEDGER TYPE FUND DEPT OBJEC3 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODEAMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 1 4105 31061 390003 CONTRACT-ADM. FEES J 1 31,442.63 1 4105 31061 800306 COMPUTER AIDEDDISPATCH J 1 287,986.32 2 4105 16000 160502 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE J 2 153,070.35 2 4105 16000 160503 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE J 2 138,280.79 2 4105 16000 160512 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA J 2 28,077.81 I J 4105 0501 EST REVENUE J 319,428.95 4105 0701 APPROPRIATION J 319,428.95 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J TOTAL 638,857.90 319,428.95 319,428.95 I PREPARED BY: MELVIN BREEDEN DATE: 08/16/2002 BD. OF SUPV. APPROVAL: ELLA W. CAREY DATE: 09/04/02 ACCT. APPROVAL: DATE: ENTERED BY: DATE: FMS2 I COUN~ OF AEBEMAREE APP # 2003 0iC REVISED 6/84 APPROPRIATION DATE 08/19/2002 BATCH NUMBER EXPLANATION: SCHOOL FUNDS FROM AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC SUB. LEDGER GENERAL LEDGER TYPE FUND DEPT OBJEC3 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODEAMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 1 2304 61101 601300 EDUC/RECSUPPLIES J 1 10,000.00 2 2000 33000 330118 AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC J 2 10,000.00 I J 2000 0501 EST REVENUE J 10,000.00 2000 0701 APPROPRIATION J 10,000.00 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J TOTAL 20,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 I PREPARED BY: MELVIN BREEDEN DATE: 08/19/2002 BD. OF SUPV. APPROVAL: ELLA W. CAREY DATE: 09/04/02 ACCT. APPROVAL: DATE: ENTERED BY: DATE: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Mickey and Barbara Pugh -- Request to amend Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: To consider amending the ACSA Jurisdictional Area boundary to provide water service to Tax Map 21, Parcel 13. STAFF CONTACT(S): Tucker, Foley, Cilimberg, Benish, Biel AGENDA DATE: September 4, 2002 ACTION: X CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes REVIEWED BY: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: INFORMATION: BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting Jurisdictional Area designation for water service only to a 3.053 acre parcel located at 4954 Dickerson Road, approximately 1,300 feet west of Route 29 (Attachment A - applicant's request, Attachment B - location and tax map). The property is located within the designated Rural Areas, in the White Hall Magisterial District. The applicant had been utilizing an on-site spring as the primary water source. However, the spring has gone dry and currently is hauling water to the residence. The applicant has not attempted to drill a well. The site is located on the west side of Dickerson Road, which forms the boundary for the Piney Mountain Development Area and Jurisdictional Area (Attachment C). GE Fanuc is located on the east side of Dickerson Road, within the Piney Mountain Development Area and Jurisdictional Area. A short distance to the west of the applicant's property, but not adjacent, is the North Pines development, which is in the Jurisdictional Area for water service only. The applicant's parcel was designated in 1982 as being outside the Jurisdictional Area and adjacent to water lines, which indicates a full review is necessary. DISCUSSION: The subject property is located in the Rural Area. The Comprehensive Plan provides the following concerning the provision of water and sewer service to the Rural Areas: "General Principle: Urban Areas, Communities, and Villages are to be served by public water and sewer (p. 109)." "Provide water and sewer service only to areas within the ACSA Jurisdictional Areas (p. 125)." "Follow the boundaries of the designated Development Areas in delineating Jurisdictional Areas (p.125)." "Only allow changes in the jurisdictional areas outside of the designated Development Areas in cases where the property is: 1) adjacent to existing lines; and 2) public health and/or safety are in danger (p.125)." The existing water line runs from the Piney Mountain Water Tank to Dickerson Road, located at the end of Piney Mountain Road, and parallels the west side of Piney Mountain Road to Dickerson Road. The line cuts through a portion of the applicant's property and crosses Dickerson Road and parallels Dickerson Road on the south-southeast side. The applicant has informed staff that the County Engineer (Harvey Bailey) promised water service when the water line was installed in the early 1970s. According to the Service Authority, this was common practice at that time. If the property owner conveyed an easement to the County for a water line, the property owner was told water service would be available. If this is the case, the applicant should be able to provide a deed that supports the claim that water would be available to the applicant's property. AGENDA TITLE: Mickey and Barbara Pugh -- Request to amend Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area September 4, 2002 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing to consider providing public water service only to the site. The site is adjacent to the Jurisdictional Area with a water line located on the applicant's property. If a public hearing is set, the applicant should provide a well driller's report, or documentation from the Department of Health, stating that there are no on-site locations for a well to provide water. Also, the applicant should try to provide documentation supporting the claim that water service would be available to the property when requested. Attachments: A - Application B - Location and Tax Map C - Jurisdictional Area Map 02.132 APPLICATION TO AMEND THE SERVICE AU. THO.R__iTY JURISDICTIONAL AREAS J~L~gDtCTION ..AL' A_R_EA DE SIGNATION .1LI~QUF. STF. D: ..... ' '.'"" '.' 5".. "DATE'$I30 FEE PAID "::":'" ""." ....,...",... PK6~Y'is:L'o~5· ~Ch:~k. App~pfiate):' .... . . '...,.:" :... '. ,. '.2~ ~. '.~'.: .5...'.... . :. · . ....... .. - .. .~ . ' . . . . · . .. .. or '- ~[.. :.':.~ ..?~,4.~?~,~:..'.,.?.' . : ". ~'..' ........' ,~:'.'.'.~. ..' ........ .' . ;. : ~ .'- ' · · · ··2. . -' .~;,?~:2~ '.'." .. .----'-':: · . .. · .. , .. ~ . .. . ," ,.. ....· .. ,.,".,' ..... ..- .......,:~ .'~: ~.4.-. · q'.~' .4~.'.}.'~ -'..'~'~.? :~', '.' ' - ..' ...?.-' '- ..... :' '." .' '. '.:' '~. r':'. " .- '. -.'.~..'. ~'..,;'.( ..... ~.~:'t .:,:.a'.-~:~q~?~:d ...... .x~'¢:,..:', ~.:>::~. ,r..<%... ...... r..' ...... · .... · · v.' · . ~.~. ~ .......,: r~;~ ~.','~k~j~Ti~'~ ';:'-:'%'.'L~ ? - -' "'.'~ ~:' .'" ' ";~;, ': "':':'.":~?-.'~,.'., ':" '"." 2,. · '. i .' · ':' .' "· ~: · ".'."'. : ..-:'..:'-.~ · *."'.'~y..' ,.' ¢-:..2' '. ',' · .'. ". ':' .' ''. ' .'; ':.2~-~.'.~. · · .. · . · ~': · '. --9 ':..' ~.. '-'. ' . '".~... . · . ' ' "~ -..~'. : ... · . ". : ' ' · ' ":'.%:.v....~.'~:'....'. ' · · · ~:'..." :~ . -, · L'.3'"~ ..-~...'.'2~ ~ "'- ' .... · .... ...'. :;' , .;,' ' '.,,' ..... '"; ': ',i ~:,;:... · ....'::.. '[. . · . ,.'[ ,. · .. .'..:~.: ~ .; . ", . . · · *. . . · ' · ' .~'. ~ ; !...4. '}'..~:.:"' i'' · .- · · ' . ".'," .... ;." ,' .'':'i {' ;?t ;, ,.; :. .. ..~, . ...~ .x' : .. C~T .SERVICE AtLF..A. DESIGNATION (If any): ' · '[--[... Water. and $~w{~r [] Wa~er Only. [] W~ Onl~ to Ex~t~g St~t~ ~ Limffed S~ice ".'~S~ FOR.] '[ ACSA JurisdiCtional' Area. Re'quest'~'I' · TM 21, P 1.3 0rater Only...).... , A'VI.~ACHMENT B '-~]F4ffCE ~F Di: r.u:Cq3I~&A..G~IIC:DA'['~ ~ERI.qc:I:.,..~I~D,~[ Jurisdictional'. Area-Request',- TM 21~ P 13 (Water Only) Albemarle County Service Authority: Jurisdiction.al Areas MAP.. ·LEGEND WATER ONLY WATER AND SEWER WATER ONLY TO EXISTING S'TRUCTURF$ [Please see "Ust of Existing Structures OR DeveloPmen~ Rights" for specific slructure.~ and dates.] LIMITED SERVICE [PLEASE SEE "Lisf of ~,isting Structures OR Development Rights" for specific limitat[ons:] REYkff~D; 1f3~)84 , 8/11/98 ALBEMARLE COUNTY i.tg ? -...? 5~ WHITE· HALL AND_ RIVANNA DI~TRIGT$ SECTION 21 BOARD -TO Agenc~ Item #: / September 4, 2002 - 10:15 a.m. c~'~ ~: A Monthly Communications Report of activities from the Albemarle County School Board to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors. Highlights: School Board Briefs August 8 and 22, 2002 Board Briefs were provided via e-mail. RECENT SUPERINTENDENT'S CONTRACT: The Board at a special meeting on August 19 voted to extend Dr. Castner's contract until June 30, 2006. SAT SCORES: College-bound seniors who graduated from Albemarle County high schools in 2002 have again shown significant gains on both the Verbal and Math sections of the annual SAT tests as compared to the results from one year earlier. In addition, county students' average SAT scores also top the averages for both Virginia and the nation. Attachment 1 is a media release from the Division regarding the SAT scores. OPENING DAY OF SCHOOL: We had a successful opening day of school. Nearly 12,200 students flooded the hallways of our schools. Enrollment was within 1% of projected numbers. Building Services worked hard to make improvements to the schools. At least nine of the schools had completed renovations or reconstructions within the last week. The Transportation Department also worked hard to make routing improvements. 132 regular busses and 28 special education busses navigated approximately 10,000 miles of County roads without major problems or incidents. Many principals said that it was a quiet, smooth opening day of school. In fact, it was business as usual in classrooms. Students immediately engaged in instructional activities led by teachers with clear focus on building relationships with student achievement in mind. During the 2002-03 School Year, ten schools will pilot the Design 2004 instructional model through which teacher teams integrate core academic instruction with instructional technology applications. For more information about the Design 2004 model, the ten instructional proposals selected as pilot projects are posted to the Design 2004 web site at http://kl2.albemarle.org/Design2004/home.html. Over 490 new computers were ordered this summer and 283 of these computers were installed prior to the start of school. These new computers meet the minimum standards for classroom and administrative computers used by teachers, students, and classified staff. These 490 new computers are necessary to upgrade existing hardware, support the opening of Baker-Butler Elementary, and ensure that all classroom instructional spaces are supported with a computer that meets minimal instructional standards. SCHOOL BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT PRIORITIES: The Board is scheduled to approve the School Board/Superintendent Priorities for 2002- 2004 at our September 12 meeting. ADDITION TO MONTICELLO HIGH SCHOOL: At the August 8 meeting, the Board voted to add 300 seats to Monticello High School. The Architecture Selection Committee, at the September 12 meeting, will be recommending that Rancom Wildman Architects be selected to do the additions at Monticello. Also at the meeting on September 12, the Board will be discussing the next steps in the redistricting process. STUDENT MAKE A DIFFERENCE DAY: The Board adopted a proclamation declaring October 26, 2002 as Student Make A Difference Day. The Board encourages everyone to encourage and assist our students in completing projects to benefit the community. ALBEMARLE P UBL IC WEB SI TE: COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INFORMATION CENTER h ttp://l~ 12. alb etnarle, org ME DIA RE LEASE For Irr~Mi~ Rdease 'We Expect Success" DATE: CONTA.CT: PHONE: August 27, 2002 Para Moran, Assistant Superintendent for Instruction 296-5820 Albemarle County's SAT Scores Rise Again College-bound seniors who graduated from Albemarle County high schools in 2002 have again shown significant gains on both the Verbal and Math sections of the annual SAT tests as compared to the results from one year earlier. In addition, county students' average SAT scores also top the averages' for both Virginia and the nation. The improving scores were achieved even as the Albemarle County Public Schools continues to show a higher percentage of students taking the SAT than occurs, on average, statewide or nationally. Albemarle Coumy's 2002 SAT results include the following: Albemarle County's 2002 college-bound seniors earned an average Verbal score of 550, up six (6) poims over 2001. (The average Verbal score for Virginia seniors was 510, the same as in 2001. The average Verbal score for the nation was 504, down two points from 2001.) Albemarle County's 2002 college-bound seniors earned an average Math score of 543, up fourteen (14) points over 2001. (The average Math score for Virginia seniors was 506, up five points over 2001. The average Math score for the nation was 516, up two points from the prior year.) The percentage of Albemarle County seniors scoring 600 or above on the Verbal test was 35 percent, up from 34 percent in 2001. (In Virginia, 23 percent of seniors scored 600 or above on the Verbal test; for the nation, the fi~re was 21 percent.) The percentage of Albemarle County seniors scoring 600 or above on the Math test was 33 percent, up from 29 percent in 2001. (In Virginia, 23 percent of seniors scored 600 or above on the Math test; for the nation, the figure was 25 percent.) Seventy-two percent of students in the Albemarle County graduating classes of 2002 took the SAT, up from 71 percent in 2001. (Sixty-eight percent of Virginia graduates took the test, the same percentage as in 2001. Nationally, 46 percent of graduates took the SAT, up from 45 percent in 2001.) 401 Mclntire Road * Charlottesville, VA 22902 Phone (434) 972-4055, Fax (434) 296-5869 , WEB SITE: http://kl2.albemarle.org SAT Summary Data ' = Mean Score Score Score Number % of Diff. (Average) Diff. Mean Diff. Mean Diff. Taking Grad. From Verbal From (Average) From (Average) From SAT Class 2001 Score 2001 ~ Math Score 2001 Total Score 2001 Al-IS 261 78 0 553 + 3 542 + 22 1095 +25 Monticello HS 133 63 + 7 499 + 1 495 - 2 994 -1 Murray HS 10 63 na * * * * * · WAILS 158 76 - 2 589 + 19 585 + 19 1174 +38 Albemarle County 562 72 + 1 550 + 6 543 + 14 1093 +20 Virginia 50,437 68 0 510 0 506 + 5 1016 +5 Nation 1,327,831 46 + 1 504 - 2 516 + 2 1020 0 * Data not available fi.om The College Board due to the small number of students taking the test. Percentage of Students Scoring 600 or Above Western Albemarle Monticello Albemarle Albemarle ' HS HS HS County VA Nation Verbal 37 18 47 35 23 21 Math 32 17 51 33 23 25 These improved results are attributed to a variety of factors, all of which have been demonstrated by The College Board to result in higher SAT results: More students are taking rigorous Advanced Placement and honors courses. For example, 49 percent of County 2002 graduating seniors completed at least one Advanced Placement course during their high school career. The percentage of college-bound seniors taking four or more years of mathematics has increased fi.om 74 percent in 2000 to 81 percent in 2002. The percentage of college-bound seniors taking four or more years in the natural sciences has increased fi.om 57 percent in 2000 to 73 percent in 2002. The percentage of college-bound seniors taking four or more years of history and social sciences has increased fi.om 36 percent in 2000 to 79 percent in 2002. Increased accountability for both schools and students. The College Board released the latest SAT results for 2001-02 college-bound high school seniors to the public on August 27, 2002. SAT Verbal and Math scores are reported on a scale ranging fi.om 200 to 800. SAT scores are typically considered in college admission decisions. 401 Mclntire Road · Charlottesville, VA 22902 Phone (434) 972-4055, Fax (434) 296-5869 , WEB SITE: http://kl2.albemarle.org COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Strategic Planning Framework SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Framework for County's Strategic Plan development STAFF CONTACT(S): Tucker, White, Foley, Hildebeidel, AIIshouse AGENDA DATE: September 4, 2002 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: Yes ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: X INFORMATION: BACKGROUND: At the August 7 Board Meeting, the Board received a copy of the County's strategic planning time line. DISCUSSION: To keep the BOS updated on the County's progress, attached is a draft strategic planning framework developed by the County's Leadership Team and the Management Group, which provides you with an initial outline of the County's Vision, Mission, Goals and identified "strategic issues" which relate to each goal. This is a dynamic process and this framework and the strategic plan will continue to evolve. As you review these materials, you will note that staff has proposed some additional goals and combined some goal areas while maintaining the Board's direction. In accordance with the strategic planning timeline, staff members will continue to refine this framework. They will develop strategic objectives for specific prioritized issues, which will be presented to you in October for your consideration. We will update you further on September 4 and the Board will be asked to discuss and approve the Strategic Plan Framework, Goals and Strategic Objectives at the October 2, 2002 board meeting. 02.138 VISION To maintain Albemarle County's stature as a quality community by promoting the values of education and lifelong learning, historic and scenic preservation, safety, affordability, cultural diversity, citizen participation and economic opportunity that make the County a desirable place in which to grow up, raise a family and grow old while preserving our natural resources, rural character and visual beauty for future generations, MISSION To Enhance the well-being and quality of life for all citizens through the provision of the highest level of public service consistent with the prudent use of public funds Protect the County's Hatural, Scenic and Historic Resources Enhance the Quality of Life for all Albemarle County Citizens GOALS Education and Life long Learning GOALS GOALS Protectand/orpreservethe County's rural character Protectand/orpreservethe County's naturalresources Protectand/orpreservethe County's historic and cultural resources Protectand/orpreservethe County's scenic resources Protectand/orpreservethe County's open spaces Make the County a safe and healthy community in which citizens feel secure to live, work and play Provide an efficient and responsive human services system that emphasizes prevention and fosters self- sufficiency Promote a variety of safe, sanitary & affordable housing types Plan, develop and maintain a diverse regional transportation system that addresses population growth and protects neighborhoods Maintain a strong and sustainable economy Provide opportunities for the healthy and productive use of leisure time IProvide Effective and Efficient County services to the public in a courteous and equitable manner Provide effective, responsive and courteous service to our customers Improve the County's work ,rocesses, training programs, and uses of technology Fund County services in a fair, efficient manner and provide needed public facilities and infrastructure Create and maintain an effective dialogue with the community, that incorporates on-going feedback systems Maintain and improve relationships with other public urisdictions in order to provide better services to our citizens Attract and retain employees who will provide efficient and high quality services Improve internal communication systems with employees and among County work groups Provide for environmentally sensitive government operations at the local and regional level GOALS This will be combination of the School Board's goals and other goals to be developed at a later date GOALS Design a public safety system that can quickly respond to an emergency scene with adequate personnel Include needs of growing ethnic population Increase communit ownership and connectivity by strengthening community/ government partnerships Protect children and adults from abuse and neglect Reduce crime Enhance the Quality of Life for all Albemarle County Citizens I Il Provide early identification prevention & intervention of at risk children, families, and adults Support the provision of safe, stable and long- term care for individuals- children, youth and older adults- who cannot reside in their own homes or who can do so only with specialized supportive services Provide a continuum of services for children and youth with seamless transition Plan and implement strategies to address the needs and resources of the growing aging population Expand affordable high quality rental housing options Promote affordable homeownership Preserve and maintain the existir housing stock Provide multi-model transportation networks Modify VDOT Public Roads standards to implement neighborhood model Implement traffic reduction strategies Improve major road networks Enable every citizen to be a self-sufficient contributing member of a skilled workforce Provide basic infrastructure and appropriately designated land for business/industrial activity Protect resources that contribute to a positive economic environment Encourage a variety of tourism activities in order to bring outside resources into the community Develop and maintain recreational opportunities for all citizens Ensure application of the twelve principles of the Neighborhood Model for all open space/public efforts to enhance cultural tourism Provide Effective and Efficent County services to the public in a courteous and equitable manner GOALS ISTRATE ICISSUES I Establish Develop and standards/ maintain "State criteria for of-the.Art" quality technology customer systems service Re-engineer wor Provide processes and services organizational through a structures variety of _ means to reach all segments of Provide the citizenry mandatory customer service training Create urgent incentives for the staff to provide better customer service Seek legislative changes to give urbanized area counties the same legislative authorities that Virginia cities have. Involve citizens and stakeholders in improving budgeting and decision-makin[ processes Use the Capital Improvements Program to plan for and fund capital needs Establish a fee structure that recovers the County's cost of providing specialized services that have focused beneficiaries Seek legislative changes to provide the County with more appropriate revenue and taxing authorities Increase efforts to influence the State's funding decisions- esp. to fund mandates Provide outreach and county information and operations directly to citizens Create opportunities fm meaningful civic engagement Provide responsive feedback and updates for citizens who participate Identify opportunities for effective and positive cooperation with the Univ. of VA, the City of Charlottesville, other adjoining localities, the Commonwealth, and the Federal Government Evaluate additional cooperative efforts and shared programs with these entities Strive to make Establish and Albemarle maintain a variet County an of effective "employer of avenues for choice" internal communication Select and hire exceptional Provide employees opportunities for _ cross-training among Provide departments competitive pay and benefits ~ Create a culture that values employee career growth Create an attractive work environment for employees and customers Protect the County's Natural, Scenic and Historic Resources GOALS ~ c~ ~ i c~,s,~ Establish and communicate service levels and range of service differences between the rural areas and the development areas Develop and adopt land use policies for the rural and development areas Plan for transportation needs in the rural and development areas Preserve the County's water resources in order to protect the environment and conserve resources for future use Develop knowledge of and increase community's awareness of the importance of biological resources to protect the County's ecosystems Protect agricultural land and forests Protect mountain resources Pursue measures to protect wooded areas Reduce light pollution and promote lighting energy efficiency measures Identi~ and recognize the value of buildings, structures, landscapes, sites and districts Pursue additional protection measures and incentives to =reserve historic and archaeological resources Maintain the visual integrity of all of Albemarle's roadways Protect the scenic quality of Albemarle's streams Protect the scenic quality of Albemarle's mountains Promote protection of important open space lands through conservation easements Identi~ open space areas for public access or recreation Recognize value of urban open space areas as a structure element in emerging urban areas and a part of a larger network of urban opens spaces Establish a county. wide network of greenway trails Provide efficient and environmentally sensitive solid waste management Provide efficient and environmentally sensitive water resource management Provide efficient and environmentally sensitive public facilities Provide efficient and environmentally sensitive transportation systems SEPTEMBER 4, 2002 CLOSED SESSION MOTION I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2-3711 (A) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA · UNDER SUBSECTION (1) TO CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS; UNDER SUBSECTION (3) TO DISCUSS THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR A PUBLIC USE FINDING THAT A DISCUSSION IN AN OPEN MEETING WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE BARGAINING POSITION OR NEGOTIATING STRATEGY OF THE COUNTY; UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND STAFF REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION RELATING TO THE DENIAL OF A SITE PLAN; UNDER SUBSECTION (7).TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND STAFF REGARDING PROBABLE LITIGATION RELATING TO A PUBLIC SAFETY INCIDENT; AND UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING SPECIFIC LEGAL MATTERS REQUIRING THE PROVISION OF LEGAL ADVICE RELATING TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND OTHER POLITICAL ENTITLES. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Members of the Board of Supervisors Laurie Bentley, C.M.C. Senior Deputy Clerk August 30, 2002 Vacancies on Boards and Commissions I have updated the list of vacancies on boards and commissions through December 31, 2002. interviews are scheduled for the September 4 meeting. Thank you. Cc: Bob Tucker Larry Davis Chamber of Commerce (list only) No ° ~ · David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Scottsville Charles S. Martin Bivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins l~,te Hall Dennis S. Rooker -Jack ,/ouett Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 11, 2002 Mr. Ivar Mawyar P. O. [Box 60 North Garden, VA 22959 Dear Mr. Mawyar: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed as the Samuel Miller Magisterial District representative to the Board of Equalization, with term to run from January 1, 2003 through December 31,2003. Duties of this Board are se! out in the Code of Virginia, Chapter 32, Article 14, §§ 58.1-3370 through 58.1-3389. The duties are more specifically set out in Section 58.1-3379 and read as follows: "The Board shall hear and give consideration to such complaints and equalize such assessments and shall moreover, be charged with the especial duty of increasing as well as decreasing assessments, whether specific complaint be laid or not, if in its judgment, the same be necessary to equalize and accomplish the end that the burden of taxation shall rest equally upon on all citizens of such county or city. The (Director of Finance) of such county ... shall, when requested .... cai the attention of the board to such inequalities in real estate assessments in his county or city as may be known to him. Every board of eq ualization may go upon and inspect any real estate subject to equalization by it." I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. If you have any questions about the duties of this Board, please call Mr. Woodzell at 296-5856. Sincerely, Sally H. Thomas Chairman SHT/lab Enclosure CC: Bruce Woodzell Commonwealth's Attorney Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier Jr. Scottsville' Charles S. Martin Hivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (4341 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins White Hail Dennis S. Rooker Jack Jouett Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 11, 2002 Mr. Franklin P. Micciche 2972 Cove Trace Charlottesville, VA 22911 Dear Mr. Micciche: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002 you were reappointed as the Rivanna Magisterial District representative to the Board of Equalization, with term to run from Jan uary 1,2003 through December 31, 2003. Duties of this Board are set out in the Code of Virginia, Chapter 32, Article 14, §§ 58.1-3370 through 58.1-3389. The duties are more specifically set out in Section 58.1-3379 and read as follows: "The Board sh all hear and give consideration to such complaints and equalize such assessments and shall, moreover, be charged with the especial duty of increasing as well as decreasing assessments, whether specific complaint be laid or not, if in its judgment, the same be necessary to equalize and accomplish the end that the burden of taxation shall rest equally upon on all citizens of such county or city. The (Director of Finance) of such county ... shall, when requested, .. call the attention of the board to such inequalities in.real estate assessments in his county or city as may be known to him. Every board of equalization may go upon and inspect any real estate subject to equalization by it." I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. If you have any questions about the duties of th ~s Board, please call M r. Woodzell at 296-5856. Sincerely, Sally H. Thomas Chairman SHT/lab Enclosure CC: Bruce Woodzell Commonwealth's Attorney Printed on recyc]ed paper David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier Jr. Scottsville' Charles S. Martin Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (434} 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Rooker Jack ,Jouea Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 11,2002 Mr. Dabney B. Sandridge P. O. Box 97 Crozet, VA 22932 Dear Mr. Sandddge: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed as the White Hall Magisterial District representative to the Board of Equalization with term to run from January 1, 2003 through December 31 2003. Duties of this Board are set out in the Code of Virginia, Chapter 32, Article 14, §§ 58.1-3370 through 58.1-3389. The duties are more specifically set out in Section 58.1-3379 an d read as follows: "The Board shall hear and give consideration to such complaints and equalize such assessments and sh all, moreover, be charged with the especial duty of increasing as well as decreasing assessments, whether specific complaint be laid or not, if in its judgment, the same be necessary to equalize and accomplish the end that the burden of taxation shall rest equally upon on all citizens of such county or city. The (Director of Finance) of such county ... shall, when requested .... call the attention of the board to such inequalities in real estate assessments in his county or city as may be known to him. Every board of equalization may go upon and inspect any real estate subject to equalization by it." I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. If you have any questions about the duties of this Board, please call-Mr. Woodzell at 296-5856. - . Sincerely, Sally Iq. Thomas Chairman SHT/lab Enclosure CC: Bruce Woodzell Commonwealth's Attorney Printed on rec~/c]ed paper David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Scottsville Charles S. Mar~in Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (4341 296-5843 FAX I434) 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Rooker ,Jack Joue~ Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 11, 2002 Mr. C. Marshall Thompson 3541 Loftsland Dr. Earlysville, VA 22936 Dear Mr. Thompson: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed as the Rio Magisterial District representative to the Board of Equalization, with term to run from January 1, 2003 through December 31,2003. Duties of this Board are set out in the Code of Virginia, Chapter 32, Article 14, §§ 58.1-3370 through 58.1-3389. The duties are more specifically set out in Section 58.1-3379 and read as follows: "The Board shall hear and give consideration to such complaints and equalize such assessments and shall, moreover, be charged with the especial duty of increasing as well as decreasing assessments, whether specific complaint be laid or not, if in its judgment: the same be necessary to equalize and accomplish the end that the burden of taxation shall rest equally upon on all citizens of such county or city. The (Director of Finance) of such county ... shall, when requested .... call the attention of the board to such inequalities in real estate assessments in his county or city as may be known to him. Every board of equalization may go upon and inspect any real estate subject to equalization by it." I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. If you have any questions about the duties of this Board, please call Mr. Woodzell at 296-5856. Sincerely, Sally H. Thomas Chairman SHT/lab Enclosure CC: Bruce Woodzell Commonwealth's Attorney Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Scottsville Charles $ Martin Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Rooker Jack O'ouett Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 11, 2002 Mr. George R. Lade 107 Tally Ho Dr. Charlottesville, VA 22901 / Dear Mr. La~..~J~... At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed as the Jack Jouett Magisterial District representative to the Board of Equalization, with term to run from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003. Duties of this Board are set out in the Code of Virginia, Chapter 32, Article 14, §§ 58.1-3370 through 58.1-3389. The duties are more specifically set out in Section 58.1-3379 and read as follows: "The Board shall hear and give consideration to such complaints and equalize such assessments and shall, moreover, be charged with the especial duty of increasing as well as decreasing assessments, whether specific complaint be laid or not, if in its judgment, the same be necessary to equalize and accomplish the end that the burden of taxation shall rest equally upon on all citizens of such county or city. The (Director of Fin ance) of such county.., shall, when requested .... call the attention of the board to such inequalities in real estate assessments in his county or city as may be known to him. Every board of equalization may go upon and inspect any real estate subject to equalization by it." I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. If you have any questions about the duties of this Board, please call Mr. Woodzell at 296-5856. Sincerely, Chairman SHT/lab Enclosure CC: Bruce Woodzell Commonwealth's Attorney Printed on recJ~cled paper David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Scottsville Charles S. Martin Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Rooker Jack Joue~ Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 11,2002 Mr. James E. Clark, Jr. 1130 Oak Hill Dr. Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Mr. Clark: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed as the Scottsville Magisterial District representative to the Board of Equalization, with term to run from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003. Duties of this Board are set out in the Code of Virginia, Chapter 32, Article 14. §§ 58.1-3370 through 58.1-3389. The duties are more specifically set out in Section 58'.1-3379 and read as follows: "The Board shall hear and give consideration to such complaints and equalize such assessments and shall, moreover, be charged with the especial duty of increasing as well as decreasing assessments, whether specific complaint be laid or not, if in its judgment, the same be necessary to equalize and accomplish the end that the burden of taxation shall rest equally upon on all citizens of such county or city. The (Director of Finance) of such county ... shall, when requested .... call the attention of the board to such inequalities in real estate assessments in his county or city as may be known to him. Every board of equalization may go upon and inspect any real estate subject to equalization by it." I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. If you have any questions about the duties of this Board, please call Mr. Woodzell at 296-5856. Sincerely, Sally H. Thomas Chairman SHT/lab Enclosure CC: Bruce Woodzell Commonwealth'.s Attorney Prinfed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Scottsville Charles S. Martin Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Rooker Jack Jouett Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 11, 2002 Mr. Samuel A. Anderson Architect for the University The Rotunda, SE Wing, UVA Ch arlottesvi le, VA 22903 Dear Mr. Ander,~.~ - At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed to serve as the University of Virginia (non-voting) representative on the Albemarle County Planning Commission. Your new term will run from January 1, 2003 through December 31 2006. I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. ' On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, Sally H. Thomas Chairman SHT/lab Enclosure cc: Commonwealth Attorney Wayne Cilimberg Printed on recyc]ed paper David P, Bowerman l~io Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Scottsville Charles S. Martin Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Super~isors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Rooker Jack Joueti Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 10, 2002 Mr. Bruce W. Kirtley Rt. 1, Box 405 Crozet, VA 22932 Dear Mr. At the Board of Supervisors meeting hold on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed to serve on the Piedmont Housing Alliance, with your new term to run from December 3, 2002 through January 1, 2006. I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciat on for your willingness to continue to serve the County in this capacity. SliT/lab Sincerely, Sally H. Thomas Chairman Enclosure CC; Commonwealth Attorney Stu Armstrong Pr]nled on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Scotfsville Charles S. Martin Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Rooker Jack Joaett Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 10, 2002 Mr. Sonny Beale 575 Alderman Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22903 Dear Mr. Beale: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed to serve on the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Citizens Advisory Committee, with your new term to run from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2004. I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, Sally H. Thomas Chairman SHT/lab Enclosure CC: Commonwealth Attorney Lawrence C. Tropea Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Lindsay G. Dorrier Jr. Scottsvil e Charles S. Martin Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (4341 296-5843 FAX (4341 296-5800 Walter F. Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Reeker Jack Jouett Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 10, 2002 Mr. Frederick A. Missel UVA Foundation P. O. Box 400218 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4218 Dear Mr. Missel: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed to serve on the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Citizens Advisory Committee, with your new term to run from January 1, 2003 through December 31,2004. I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, Sally H. Thomas Chairman SHT/lab Enclosure cc: Commonwealth Attorney Lawrence C. Tropea Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Scot~svi]le Charles S. Martin Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800 Walter F~ Perkins White Hall Dennis S. Reeker Jack Jouett Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller September 10, 2002 Mr. Joseph T. Samuels, Jr. 3435 Ridge Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Mr. Samu~ ./ At the~Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 4, 2002, you were reappointed to serve on the ACE Appraisal Review Committee, with your new term to run from January 1, 2003 through December 31 2003. I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve the County in this capacity. SHT/lab Sincerely, Sally H. Thomas Chairm an Enclosure CC: Commonwealth Attorney Wayne Cilimberg Printed on rec.vcled paper PLEASE SIGN BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON SP-02-21 Carmichael Motom (Si.qns f~23&_P4) SP-02-30 Carmichael Motors(Signs fl66&81) NAME (~l~pase print clearly) 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PHONE NUMBER/ADDRESS (Optional) July 10, 2002 Stephen M. Melton 195 Riverbend Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: SP-02-21 Carmichael Motors- Auto Sales SP-02-30 Carmichael Motors - Outdoor Storage and Display SDP-02-045 Carmichael Motors Preliminary Site Plan - Critical Slopes Waiver REVISED Dear Mr. Melton: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on July 2, 2002, unanimously recommended denial of the above-noted petitions to the Board of Supervisors. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review SP-02-21 and SP-02-30 and receive public comment at their meeting on September 4, 2002. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Stephen Waller Senior Planner SW/jcf Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jack Kelsey Steve AIIshouse STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: STEPHEN WALLER JULY 2, 2002 AUGUST 14, 2002 SP 02-021 CARMICHEAL MOTORS - AUTO SALES SP 02-030 CARMICHAEL MOTORS - OUTDOOR STORAGE AND DISPLAY SDP 02-045 CARMICHAEL MOTORS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN Applicant's Proposal: The applicant's proposal is for the establishment of an automobile dealership, which would utilize an existing building as an office and a newly proposed structure as a shelter for washing and detailing along with two additional auto display spaces (Attachment A). This proposal requires approval of two special use permits and a waiver to allow the disturbance of critical slopes (Attachment B). The Site Review Committee will grant administrative approval of the site plan if the special use permits and waiver are all approved. Petition: The applicant's request is for special use permits to allow automobile sales in the C-1, Commercial zoning district [with Section 22.2.2(8) of the Zoning Ordinance], and outdoor storage and display in the Entrance Corridor Overlay District [Section 30.6.3.2]. The property, described as Tax Map 78, Parcel 2A contains 0.524 acres zoned C-l, Commercial and EC, Entrance Corridor (Attachment C). This site is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District on Richmond Road [State Route 250], at the intersection with Free Bridge Lane [State Route 1421]. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Regional Service in the Development Area Neighborhood 3. Character of the Area: The subject parcel is located on the north side of State Route 250, at the intersection with Free Bridge Lane. The Rivanna River lies just to the west of this site and the eastern boundary is shared with an existing service station. All other nearby parcels are similarly zoned and established with existing commercial uses. With the exception of a vacant 545 square foot building that is located at the southwestern corner of the site and a small group of trees near the northern corner of the site, a majority of the property is clear and devoid of any significantly sized vegetation. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this proposal for conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and compliance with Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, and recommends approval of the special use permits with conditions. Staff also recommends approval of the requested waiver to allow disturbance of critical slopes. Plannin~ and Zonin~ History: SP 99-017 Free Bridge Office Building - At its June 9, 1999 meeting, the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a special use permit to allow the improvement of the existing access to serve as the entrance to a proposed office building. SUB 99-206 Free Bridge Land Trust Final Plat - On September 29, 1999, Planning staff granted administrative approval of a re-subdivision plat that established the current boundaries of the subject parcel. Comprehensive Plan: Requests for special use permits within the Developments Areas are assessed for conformity with the recommendations that are set forth in the Land Use Plan. This site consists of the last vacant parcel within the area fronting on Route 250 that is recommended for Regional Service between State Route 20 North and the Rivanna River. Therefore, staff recognizes this proposal as an opportunity for infill development in a location where the County's Urban Area abuts a boundary that is shared with the City of Charlottesville. Auto dealers are listed as one of the several types of primary uses identified for Regional Service Areas under Table 1 of the Land Use Plan, entitled Land Use Guidelines. Those guidelines also recommend the implementation proper screening for uses with outdoor storage and display. Because this site is located within the Entrance Corridor Overlay District, the Architectural Review Board has reviewed the request and the proposed landscape plan for conformance with the County's design guidelines, and recommends approval with conditions (Attachment D). Due to the small size of this site and the fact that all of the nearby properties have already been developed with an orientation toward Route 250, staff has recognized that very few of the twelve principles of the Neighborhood Model are applicable to the proposal. Staff has provided an assessment of the principles below: Pedestrian Orientation - An existing concrete sidewalk extends from the western boundary of this site along the frontage of Route 250, and around to the south side of the entrance from Free Bridge Lane. Neighborhood Friendly Streets and Paths - No new streets are being proposed with this development. Interconnected Streets and Transportation Networks - The adjacent property, identified as Tax map 78/Parcel 2B, has been developed with pavement and curbing that was designed in anticipation of an inter-parcel connection with this site. The site plan accompanying this request proposes the completion of that connection, and staff is requiring the recordation of a cross access easement plat ensuring that both property owners will have permanent, unobstructed use of the connection, prior to approval of the final site plan. 2 Parks and Open Space - The opportunity to provide any significant amount of parks or open space is severely limited by the size of this parcel. However, staff recognizes that this site is adjacent to an area along the Rivanna River that is designated for potential expansion of the County's Greenway Trails and within walking distance of Darden Towe Park. Neighborhood Centers - Not applicable. Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale - Both the existing building and the proposed building are one story in height and equal 1,445 total square feet combined. Furthermore, the existing building, which would house the business office, has a street-level entrance that is easily accessible from the adjacent sidewalk and the interior portions of the site. Relegated Parking - Because the ability to provide a high level of product visibility to the widest range of potential consumers is one of the most important objectives for automobile dealerships, the placement of display parking at the rear of the site would not be viable option. Although the display areas are not viewed in the same way as standard parking spaces, staff recognizes that all of the required customer and employee parking spaces are shown at the rear of the parking lot and away from Route 250. As with all requests for outdoor storage and display, within the Entrance Corridor, this site plan is subject to Architectural Review Board guidelines for screening and issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness. Mixtures of Uses - The size of this site restricts any potential to provide a mixture of uses. Mixture of Housing Types - Not applicable. Redevelopment - Approval of this proposal would promote infill within the Development Areas and redevelopment of an existing building located on a parcel that has remained unused for several years. Site Planning that Respects Terrain - Aside from the requirement of waiver to allow the disturbance of approximately 80 square feet of critical slopes where grading is proposed, staff recognizes that the site is largely flat and level. Although portion of the site also lies within the 100-year floodplain, the Department of Engineering and Public Works has determined that no additional fill activity is proposed with the work that is shown on the preliminary site plan. Clear Boundaries with the Rural Areas - This site does not about a boundary with any of the County's Rural Areas. STAFF COMMENT: Staff will address the issues of this request in two (2) sections: Section 31.2.4.1 - SP 02-021 (Auto Sales) and SP02-030 Outdoor Storage/Display Section 4.2 - SDP 02-045 Critical Slopes 3 1. Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, The proposed automobile dealership is a use that is compatible with the Tuffy Muffler auto service on the adjacent property located to the east. The development of this site would not introduce any additional fill within the within the 100-year floodplain of the Rivanna River, and stormwater runoff that enters the trench drains would be conveyed into the proposed water quality BMP. Therefore, staff has identified no detriment to the adjacent properties that would result from the approval of this proposal. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby, This site is located within the C- 1, Commercial zoning district that is located between State Route 20 North and the Rivanna River. Properties within this area have been largely developed with a mixture of uses that range from automobile service stations and convenience stores specializing in fuel sales to fast food restaurants. The nearest automobile dealership is located approximately 1/8 mile east of this site at the intersection of State Routes 250 and 20 North, on property zoned HC, Highway Commercial. Several other automobile dealerships are located within one mile east of the site. Because Architectural Review Board approval is required for the proposed outdoor display areas as well as the architectural treatment of the two buildings, staff has no additional concern for possibility that the district would sustain any aesthetic change as a result of the proposed development of this site. and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, Staff has reviewed this proposal for compliance with the purpose and intent as set forth in Section 1.4 of the Zoning Ordinance and finds no conflict that would arise from the approval of the special use permits. with the uses permitted by right in the district, Automobile service stations and automobile repair shops are allowed as by-right service establishments in the C-1, Commercial zoning district, and are often characterized by the outdoor storage of automobiles awaiting service. Therefore, it is staff' s opinion that automobile sales and related accessory uses such as outdoor display, repair, service and wash bays can be seen as being compatible with some of the by-right uses in the district. with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance, Staff has recognized no additional regulations in Section 5.0 that specifically address automobile sales or outdoor storage and display. 4 and with the public health, safety and general welfare. This site lies within the Albemarle County Service Authority's jurisdictional areas for water and sewer, at the intersection of two existing public roads. The special use permits that have been requested are most directly related to the appropriateness of the proposed use in this particular location and its aesthetic impacts upon the Entrance Corridor. The Site Review Committee reviews all site plans for compliance with existing regulations, and any specific conditions and proffers that have been set forth in order to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Therefore, it is staff' s opinion that a combination of proper site design and the recommended conditions of special use permit approval could assist with ensuring that the proposed development does not conflict with these objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. SUMMARY: Staff has identified the following factors, which are favorable to this request: 2. 3. 4. This proposal represents an opportunity for infill portion of the Development Areas that is adjacent to the shared boundary with the City of Charlottesville; No fill activity is being proposed with this development within the floodplain on this property; This site would not require an additional point of access on to State Route 250, because of the shared inter-parcel travelway connection with an adjacent property; and, The Architectural Review Board has reviewed the request to allow outdoor storage and display and recommends approval with conditions. The following factors are relevant to this consideration: There are several automobile dealerships, convenience store with fuel sales, and automotive service stations located within a one-mile radius of this site; and, This proposal represents a redevelopment of an existing building on a parcel that is not currently being used. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval for both of the special use permits, SP 02-021 and SP 02-030, with the following conditions: Vehicles shall not be elevated. Vehicles shall be displayed only in the areas indicated for display as shown on the site plan. The use shall not commence prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Architectural Review Board. This shall include approval of landscaping and lighting plans. Shade trees, at least 3-1/2 inches in caliper and spaced at a minimum of 35 feet on center, 24-inch high screening shrubs, and interspersed ornamental trees shall be provided along the Entrance Corridor, in front of the proposed parking areas. The trees must be shown outside of all utility easements and in locations that do not conflict with overhead electric lines. Renovations of the existing building shall maintain that building's character and materials. o Staff will address the request for a critical slopes waiver with consideration for the provisions set forth in Section 4.2. Section 4.2.3.2 of the Zoning Ordinance restricts earth-disturbing activity on critical slopes, while Section 4.2.5.2 allows the Planning Commission to waive this restriction upon finding that a strict application of these provisions would not forward the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant has submitted a request and justification for a waiver, which would allow grading in an approximately 80 square feet area containing critical slopes. Critical slopes have been identified on the site plan with shading, and the applicant has addressed all five of the health, safety and welfare concerns that are set forth in the Ordinance. The site plan shows that the small portion of grading activity and several large-sized street trees are being proposed on top of the mound where the critical slopes exist. Staff has addressed the critical slopes concerns directly through the analysis provided herein, and with the standard review that is applied to all site development proposals. Proper reconstruction of slopes and establishment of vegetation in the disturbed areas will be effective in preventing the movement of any significant amount of soil. Other aspects of site design, such as the design of stormwater detention facilities and erosion and sediment control measures, are subject to Engineering Department's approval for effectiveness in addressing concerns with excessive run- off and siltation through the entire site. Because this site already has access to public sanitary sewer, the concern for possible impact on the travel of septic effluent is not relevant to this request. Engineering staff has reviewed the site plan and identified no adverse effects that would result from the requested waiver. The Department of Planning and Community Development's analysis of this request gives consideration for the concern with the possible loss of aesthetic resources. Currently, the critical slopes are characterized by a thin strip of vegetation that is approximately 20 feet at its widest point, and extends northward along the frontage of Free Bridge Lane. Although none of these slopes are delineated on the Open Space Plan's Composite Map, they are located within the 100- year floodplain in area designated as a Major and Locally Important Stream Valley. However, Engineering staff has determined that no fill activity is being proposed within that floodplain, and this site is separated from the largest portion of the critical slopes that abut the river by an existing public road. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested critical slopes waiver, which would also allow compliance with the landscaping provisions set forth in Section 32.7.9.6 that require the planting of large street trees along public road frontage. ATTACHMENTS: B- C- D- Site Plan Reduction Special Use Permit Application and Critical Slopes Waiver Request Tax Map Section Architectural Review Board Special Use Permit Recommendations VIRGINIA LAND COMPANY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE. INC. 195 RIVERBEND DRIVE · P.O. BOX 8147 · CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22906 TELEPHONE (434) 979-8181 · FAX (434) 296-3510 REALTORS July 3, 2002 Stephen B. Waller Planner County of Albemarle Department of Planning & Community Development 401 Mclntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 RE: SDP 02-045 CARMICHAEL MOTORS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN Dear Mr. Waller: In regards to the Planning Commission denying the critical slopes waiver at their July 2, 2002 meeting on the above referenced project, I would like to appeal this decision to the Board of Supervisors, to be heard at their meeting scheduled for August 14, 2002. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerel.~y, -Stephe~ M. Melton 07-11-02P02'49 RCVD BROKERS - BUILDERS - LAND DEVELOPERS - PROPER"rv MANAGEMENT PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR CARMICHAEL MOTORS TM 78 PARCEL 2A DB 1756 PAGE 562 RIVANNA DISTRICT, ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SITE DATA LEGAL REFERENCE 1M 78 PARCEL 2A SOURCE OF TITLE; DB 1756 PACE 562 OWNER: FREE BRIDGE LAND TRUST P,O. BOX 8147 CHARLOTTESVILLE· VA 22906 DE/ELOPER: CW HURl' CONTRACTORS P,O. BOX 8147 CHARLOFTESVILLE, VA 22906 ATTN. STEVE ~4ELTOh ZONING'. Cf - COMMERCIAL. EC ENTRANCE CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: RIVANNA SOURCE OF BOUNDARY SURVEY: PLAT BY ROGER RAY & ASSOCIATES SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY: FIELD SURVEY PERFORMEO BY RIVANNA ENGINEERH~ 3 & SURVEYING, PLC. USGS DATUM SENCHMARK: % IN CONCRETE FOOTER FOR STEL FRAME ELECTRIC TOWER ON PARCEL 580. ELEV=38L28 SETBACKS: ERONT YARD: BUILDING -30' FROM PUSLIC R/W PARKING ~0' FROM PUBLIC R/W SIDE YARD: NONE REAR YARD: NONE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35' PAVING SPECIFICATIONS: PARKING AREA: 6" - #21A AGGREGATE SASE MATERIAL 2" SM 9.5 SURFACE MATERIAL SIDEWALKS: 4" - 3000 PSi CONCRETE CURRENT USE: VACANT PROPOSED USE: AUTOMOBILE SATES PARKING SCHEDULE: REQUIRED: 1 SPACE PER 1500 SF OF DiSPLAv AREA. TOTAL DISPLAY AREA = 2.600 S~ CUSTOMER SPACES = 2.600 SF/1500 SF = ],7 ' SPACE PER 2 EMPLOYEES 3 EMPLOYEES/2 = 1.5 EMPLOYEE SPACE PROV!DED: 12 DISPLAY SPACEE S CUSTOMER SPACES (INCLUDES HANDICAP SPACES) 2 EMPLOYEE SPACES ~? TOTAL LOADING SPACES REQUIRED: 0 LAND USE SCHEDULE: PRE-DEVELOPMENT ~ POST-DEVELOPMENT % BLJlLDING: 545 SF 2.4 1.445 SF 6.5 PAVED: 0 SF 0 12.888 SF 56.5 PERVIOUS: 22,280 SF 97.6 8,492 SF 37.2 /OTAL: 22,825 SF 100 22.825 SF 100 GENERAL NOTES t. DO NOT SCALE ~ESE ORAWINGS, USE D~MFNSIONS SHOWN ONLY. BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DiE ATrENRON OF THE ENGINEER. - IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. 2. IT IS ]'HE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FI[LB V~ZRIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EX]SRND Ut}LIlIES $ IHE CPC. LOVER OF UGNBNG FROM PARRING AREA LUMINARIES ONTO PUBUC ROADS AND PROPERTY N RESIDENDAL OR RURAL AREAS ZONING DISTR $TS SHALl NOT EXCEED ONE-HALF (]/2) FOOl CANDLE. SITE SPECIFIC NOTES ~. MAXIMUM NUMRER OF EMPLOYEES FOR SALES OFFICE SHAL BE 3. 2 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SICNAGE SHAH BE PROVIDED, SIGN STABNG 'CUSTOMER PARKING ONLY' SHALL BE PI.ACED Ar EACH CUSTOMFR SPACE. S~GNS SI'Af ~G 'EMPLOYEE PARKING ONLY' SHALL BE PLACED AT EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACE, S THERE IS A lO0 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ON TH ~ S~TE ~ TILLS SITE S NOT LOCATED IN A RESERVOIR WATERSHED. 5. tRASH REMOVAL: ONE ROLL-OUT TRASH CON]'AiN~R 6. EXISTING ~ANDSCAPING CONSISTS PRIMARILY OF CRASS DISPLAY VEHICLES STALL NOT BE ELEVATED. D, DISPLAY VEHICLES SHALE RE DISPLAYED ONLY IN !NE AREAS tNDICATEO FOR DISPLAY ON TH~S PLAN 12 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER BMP S A BIO-F'ITLFR CONVERSION SrORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR rHIS PARCEL BECAUSE IT IS ADJACENT TO THE RIVANNA RIVER 13 SPECIAL USE PERMITS SP 02 021 AND SP 02-030 ARE ~k THE APPROVAL PROCESSES. e, NY CONBITIONS ASSOCIATED ~TH THESE PERMITS SHALL APPLY TO R~iS S FEPLAN. / ~../ /~.~-" VICINITY MAP SCALE: '" = 1000' GENERAL WATER & SEWER CON ~ORK SHALL BE SUB, ECT TO INSPECTION BY filE ALBEMARLE COUNTY SLRV]CE AUTHDRIT~ INSPECTORS THE CONTRACTOR ~LL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOIIFWNG THE PROPER SERVICE AUU~ORFTv OF'FICiA,.S ~ iRE START OF THE WORK 2, l~HE LOCADON OF FXiSDNG U~]dT{ES ARE NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND, WHERE SHOWN, ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE DiE CONTRACTOR SNAL~. LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND LINES AND STRUClUR£S AS NECESSARY $. ALL MATERIALS ~,ND CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WH~I GENERAL WATER AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION SDECiFiCAOONS AS ADOPTED B'~ INE ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY ON JANUANY 15. 1998 a DATUM FOR ALL ELEVAtIONs SDOWN IS NARONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ALBEMARLE COUNTY ENGINEERING GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES I PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN ANY EXISTING PUDUC R DH'L--OF-WAY, INCEUOING CONNECTION TO ANY EXISTING ROAD, A PERMIT SHA~L BE OBTAINED FROM ThE ViRGINiA DEPARTMEN] DF TRANSPOR1ADON (V.D.O.T.) THIS PLAN AS DRAWN MAY NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE REQUIREMENTS OF DiE PERMIT. WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMI1 SHALL GOVERN. 2. ALL PA~NG. DRAINAGE RELATED MATERIALS AND CONS~UCT~ON ME.ODS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF VD,O,T. UNEESS OTHERWISE NO!~,D ~, EROSION AND SiLTATiON CONSOL M~SURES SHALL BE PRO,DER ~N ACCORDANCE ~TH IHE APPROVED ERO~ ~ C~NIROL PLAN AND SHAI BE NSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING, GRADING OR OTNER CONSIRUCTJWN ~. ALL SLOPER AND DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE FERRLIZED. SEEDED AND MULCHER. ThE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE IS 2:1 ~HORIZONTAL:VERIlCAL) ~ER[ REASONABLY OBTAINABLE. LESSER SLOPES OF 4:1 OR BFTTEN ARE fo ACHIEVED. ATTACHMENT A Revwions: NO, DESCRIPTION DAtE Shee[ S1 of 3 8 AIL EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND DIRE INS'rALiAiION MUST COMP Y WITI OSHA STANDARDS FOR HiE CONSTRUCTION iNDUSTRY [29 CFR PART 1926). DRAWING INDEX I of 3 COVLR SHEET 2 Gl ,3 SITE PLAN 3 of 3 LIGHTING PLAk LEGEND --W/E .... O/E-- MH DPD 500 Exit[in9 Nateriine Overhead Electrc x [500] Power Pole Manh( e Backflow Exist= g Elevation/Contour Proposal Elevation Proposed Contour Slooes Greater Then 25% Concrete Sidewo~ Povec Area APPROVALS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ZONING DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT/FIRE OFFICIAL SERVICE AUTHORITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VIRGINIA HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD ~ ARCHtTECTURA_ REVIEW FIRE OFFICIAL 'do. OdE] H,g = 3J2 JS 006 '~odS Xoldsl(]-g JoJ J~aqs po~odoJd [o'1~] ,~z /7 ? ..... KACM ATTACHMENT ( % % STATISTICS lLUMINAIRE SCHEDULE lO 0 10 20 30 LUMINAIRE LOCATIONS a 1)UOTHY r. ~r z S3 ol OFFICE ATTACHMENT B S tit) Application for Special Use.Permit County of Albemarle ~-'~-' ~eepa~~n-t ;f BUilding Code a, ATTAeHM£NT 8 *Existing Use. ~'-~ $'4t~7-/0t/Lq7'- -'' *Zoning District *Zoning Ordinance Section number re.quested, ." - (*staff will assist yOU with these items) Number 0£ acres to be covered by Special Use Permit ,,,. ,.,~0. It,.. ~ a.,,.~,. ~. m,, .40~.~ .~ 2- ~' / Is this an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit? Fl Yes~o Are you submitting a site development plan with tiffs application*, lit/Yes21 No 0~'- ~' :r''~ .a , , Proposed Use . · . ,, : .... - -_ _. Contact Person {Whom shoula we ~all/writc concerning thi~ project?): <~7'~./~/~Z"7~l ~, Address [¢~':~/Z'~"*r"/~x~/~'~2)~i~ City/~,~'/~.~-4Y:'~,~,'~ '. _ . , State t.~,,~ Zip DaytimePhone(('~5/) ~f:aff-'~/°°'/ Fax# r~fi'~"~/a:> E-mail . ~d~dreser o~flapd ~(.:~ilistcili~th~Cpunty'sl~c..ord~l):' /A"~2~'~""' x~/~'~ ~~ ~Daytime Phone (~) ~- ~f~/ Fax ~ E mail Applie. ant (Who i~ ti,e contra person representing? Who is requesting thesp¢¢ial Address City ' ' State Daytime Phone ( ) Fax # E-mail Zip __ Tax map andparceL 'Tg - ~ ~ ~,. Physical Address ~0~[I0~ O[ pro~eF~ (l~d~,imc~cfions, orom~r) ~~ ~ Does the owner of this property own (or have any ownership interest in) any abutting property? If yes, please list those tax map and parcel numbers "),~' - tZ~ Fee amount $ .... Date Paid History: Fl Special USe Pemfits: ! ~,~.~: ~ .... Check # _ '~ ') .Receipt # { ' - ' '? By: Fl ZMAs and Proffers: 21 Variances: Concurrent review or Site Development Plan? {;~tter of Authorization ~ eno 401 Mclntire Road -:. Charlottesville. VA 22902 .:- Voice: 296-5832 .:. Fax: 972-4126 i_,l O~ti~?~A]b~m?!e county ~ning ordinance states that. "The board of :. the.right'to issue all s~iaI use permits permitted ....· ,,,,, ~ ~r,~;"anc~ a ~f Sul~:~fiiial d~'~nt to ad · ATTACHMENT.B :-: use-allOt the Character'Of fl~e district su ........ ATTACHMENT B Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the ~nvolved :n ttae use, operating hours, and any unique features of:the use: <'Sq'/g~/r---A/A~Xz'-" /~,'.~f2x.~ ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED - provide two(2) copies of each: Recorded plat or boundary survey of the property requested for the rezoning. If there is no recorded plat or boundary survey, please provide legal description of the property and the Deed Book and page number or Plat Book and page number. C-~r of 5.:/-~ fi/L.. Note: If you are requesting a special use permit only for a portion of the property, it needs to be described or delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing. Ownership information - If ownership of the property, is in the name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document :acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing below has the authority to do so. If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application. If the applicant is the agent of. the owner, a documen.t acc.eptable to the County must be submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency. OPTIONAL ATTACHMENTS: Drawings or conceptual plans, if any. Additional Information, if any. :I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application. I also certify'that the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my :knowledge. Signature Date Printed Name 9 ?f- Daytime phone number of Signatory 14 Post Office Box 7603 Charlottesville, VA 22906 Rrv ^ ENOINEERINO SURVEYING, PLC ATTACHMENT B 434.984. I599 (F) 434.984.8863 RESI@cstone.net June 14,2002 Stephen Waller Planner County of Albemarle 401 Mdintire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, VA :22902 RE: SDP-02-045 .~q¢4~'~ I£~tx~E'L. z7307dA S Dear Mr. Waller: This is to request a waiver for the requirements of Section 4,2. The Site Development plans shows an 80 square foOt area with 25% or greater slopes that will have to be graded as part of this project. 1. The proposed grading is not significant enough to require rapid or large-scale movement of soil and rock. The material removed from this site will be used as fill matedal on site. 2. The drainage area for this project is less than 1 acre so excessive stormwater run-off will not occur. 3. A sediment trap will provide erosion protection for all natural and man-made bodies of water. 4. Th ere are no aesthetic resources associated with this project 5. There are no septic systems or near this property. A portion of this property is in a flood plain. The reasons given ..above demonstrate that the grading of critical slopes on this project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and/or welfare of the public. Please call me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Timothy Miller, P.E., P.L.S. President ALBEMARLE COUNTY CARMICHEAL MOTORS SITE_ ATTACHMENTC 77 MONTICELLO r. I SECTION 78 79 ATTACHMENT C 3RIVE COUNTY OF ALBEMA~E Department of' Planning & Community Development 401 McIntiCe Road, Room 218 Charl0ttesvilIe, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296 - 5823 Fax (434) 972 - 4012 ATTACHMENT D May 10, 2002 Stephen M. Melton 195 Riverbend Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 ARB-2002-37 Carmichael Motors; Tax Map 78, Parcel 2A Dear Mr. Melton: The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on May 6, 2002, completed a preliminary review of the above-noted request to renovate an existing building and to construct a new building for use as an automobile dealership, and to establish outdoor display of vehicles. The Board offered the following comments for the benefit of the applicant's final submission. Please note that the following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments may be added or eliminated based on further review and changes to the plan The ARB expressed no objection to. the Special Use Permit subject to the following conditions: l. Vehicles shall not be elevated. 2. Vehicles shall be displayed only in the areas indicated for display shown on the plan. 3. The use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the ARB, including landscape and lighting plans. 4. Provide 3W' caliper shade trees at a minimum of 35' on center, 24" high screening shrubs, and interspersed ornamental trees, along the EC in front of the proposed parking area. Show these trees outside all utility easements and in locations that do not conflict with overhead electdc lines. This will likely require the shifting or reduction of parking spaces. 5. Ti,e renovation of the existing building shall maintain the building's cha, racter and materials. Regarding the preliminary site plan, the ARB offered the following comments for the benefit of the applicant's final submittal: 1. Provide details on the proposed renovation for the existing building. Indicate how the slate roof will be treated Indicate proposed window treatments. 2. Provide elevations for the new building. Indicate on the drawings that the brick will match that of the existing building. 3. Provide a shingle sample. The shingles for the shelter shall coordinate with the slate of the existing building. 4. Provide color samples for all wood/trim/paint for both buildings. 5. Provide information on all proposed signage for the site. For freestanding s~gns, monument signs utilizing materials that coordinate with the building are recommended. 6. Provide a site plan with legible topo lines. (The existing topo lines on the submitted plan are barely visible.) 18 ATTACHMENT D Page 2 May 10, 2002 '13. 14. 7. To maintain the.character of the existing building, it is recommended that no signs be attached to it. 8. Provide a complete landscape plan. Provide all required ARB landscaping. Consult the ARB guidelines for requirements. 9. Provide 3~" caliper shade trees at a minimum of 35' on center, 24" high screening shrubs, and interspersed ornamental trees, along the EC in front of the proposed parking area. :Show this landscaping outside all utility easements and in locations that do not conflict with overhead electdc lines. This will likely require the shifting or reduction of parking spaces. Please note that ornamental trees need not alternate With all shade trees. A grouping of ornamental trees in the southeast corner of the site would be appropriate. Coordinate landscape placement with the parking overhang. 10. In addition to the required 2~" shade trees required 40' on center along Free Bridge Lane, provide ornamentals to further soften the impact of the development in the planting area north of the .existing building and west of the proposed shelter. 11. Landscaping shall be coordinated with the approved landscaping for the Tuffy Muffler site. 12. Reduce the total height of pole lights to 18' maximum to better coordinate with the buildings on site. Provide information indicating ACSA approval of the light pole in the utility easement. Indicate how the proposed shelter will be illuminated. Provide cut sheets for cutoff fixtures, nclbde the fixtures on the photometric plan. 15. If a dumpster is proposed, show it on the plan. Include details on how it will be screened from view. 16. Show mechanical equipment on the plan. Show how it will be screened from view of the EC. 17. Provide a hipped roof for the.new building. 18. Lower the height of the eave of the new building so it matches the eave height of the old building. 19. Replacement windows shall have simulated divided lights for true character. 20. Mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. You may submit your application for final ARB review at your earliest convenience. A submission and review schedule is attached. Revised drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Please include a memo outlining how each comment has been addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made identify those changes in the memo also. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Design Planner MM/jcf' cc: File August 29, 2002 08-30-02A08:18 RCVD Re: Agenda Item, Public Hearing, September 4, 2002 SP-2002-021 Carmichael Motors - Auto Sales SP-2002-030 Carmichael Motors - Outdoor Storage and Display SDP 2002-045 Carmichael Motors Preliminary Site Plan, Tax Map 78, 2A Madam Chair ~nd Members of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors: My name is Leslie Middleton. I reside in Charlottesville and want to express opposition to the siting of Carmichael Motors at Parcel 2A of Tax Map 78, the lot on the comer of Free Bridge Lane and Route 250 for the following reasons: This site has tremendous visibility in one of the major entrance corridors to both the city and the county and at the same time it crosses the Rivanna River. It is wholly unique in this way. Whatever happens on this site will signal either a new way of looking at our relationship to the river and its associated greenway or simply the status quo, business as usual. Business as usual includes yet one more, albiet small and sensitively developed, car dealership. Going west on 250, is this the last thing we want visitors to see before they see Free Bridge and perhaps cast an eye over the rail to look at the river? Headed east towards Richmond, will this business be yet one more of the expanse of service stations, fast-food stores and car dealerships that now flank the road towards 1-647 Might this choice point be an opportunity to say respectfully "no" to one thing and to say "yes" to another? I think so. This site cries out to be utilized in a way that, rather than ignoring the river, highlights it, shows it off, makes a person curious to know more, see more. The Rivanna, Mr. Jefferson's River, is not as visible as many urban rivers. And the businesses on both sides of the river at Free Bridge do little more than provide access, limited at that. Might the County continue its commendable work towards land preservation and river protection by going further and encouraging the business community to become active stewards of the river through entrepreneurial choices that highlight this precious and essential resource? ! hope so. This site sits at the intersection of the Rivanna Trail system, presently on the City side of the river, the County's greenway, and the Free Bridge spanning the river. Upriver on the county side is Darden Towe Park, down river are plans to continue to the Greenway to the historic Woolen Mills dam and lock and beyond towards Milton. People see this comer most frequently from the window of their automobiles. That includes me. But many people, including me, more and more, are wanting and needing places to walk to, places to bike to. Destinations for family outings. What, at this confluence of river, trail, bike, and foot traffic invites a person to stop along the way? Certainly not a used car dealership, unless it might be the Coke machine outside. I ask you to take a moment to imagine something else at this site. Imagine, perhaps, a small restaurant, called the "Gateway House," with outdoor seating and window service. Might you walk with your family down the county's cool and shaded Greenway along Free Bridge Lane to catch a bite to eat after a Saturday soccer game? Or imagine a small tourist information and welcome center, one that showcases what the county has to offer, especially its natural amenities, especially the river. What if there were a small brown sign, you know the ones that mark natural areas and parks throughout our state and country that said something like "Rivanna Welcome Center: Albemarle County Gateway to Mr. Jefferson's River." I don't know about you, but if I was a first- time visitor or newcomer to the area and I saw this sign on that sweet old building, I wouldn't be able to keep my car from turning in and finding out more. Or, imagine if there were at this comer, an outfitter's shop, "The Rivanna River House," showcasing canoes, kayaks, present day river travel. I know you can't mandate those kinds of businesses, but by saying "no" to another car dealership, you could be saying "yes" to the one of these scenarios, just waiting to happen on this site. I think Mr. Jefferson would be appalled at the development that has sprouted up along the river, both sides, in our modem era, not for the commercial nature of it -- since he, too was a business person -- but for the fact that the business entirely ignore the river's existence. I think he would applaud the actions of a Board that is willing to take a positive step towards shifting the emphasis of riverside industry to one that encourages appreciation of the river. In our modem era, we struggle to understand how to be in relationship with a river that we no longer seem to "need" in the same way as when it was used for transportation and commerce. But there are ways, and I have named some of them. I started my comments by saying that I am a resident of the City. And I am fully aware that this is a County decision. But the final thing I would ask this Board to consider is this: This river belongs to all of us. Its watershed is ours together, along with other counties, to preserve, protect, to enjoy and learn from, and to learn more about. The river that goes under the bridge before this parcel could become one of our region's showcase features, along with Monticello, the mountains, its vistas, and rolling hills. Or it could continue to go, largely unnoticed except by the few individuals, privileged enough to know her by boat, or determined enough to creep along her banks by foot. Something about this site asks for more. I respectfully ask you to respond in kind. Sincerely, Leslie Middleton 1608 Oxford Road Charlottesville, VA 22903-1330 (434) 293-5770 September 4, 2002 Re: Agenda Item, Public Hearing, September 4, 2002 RECEIVED AT BOS MEETING Clerk's Initials: ~ SP-2002-021 Carmichael Motors - Auto Sales SP-2002-030 Carmichael Motors - Outdoor Storage and Display SDP 2002-045 Carmichael Motors Preliminary Site Plan, Tax Map 78, 2A Madam Chair and Members of the Board: My name is Leslie Middleton. I reside in Charlottesville and want to express opposition to the Permits and Appeal for Cannichael Motors at Parcel 2A of Tax Map 78, (the lot on the comer of Free Bridge Lane and Route 250). This site is unique in its location adjacent to the Rivanna River and its intersection with numerous community byways. Here, the County's Greenway coming south from Darden Towe Park will go under the bridge and continue downriver. Here, the Rivanna Trails circling the City meet the County's Greenway. And finally, here, the river itself - a state scenic river, a designated American Treasure -- is the pathway for the newly created Rivanna River Water Trail. The proposed used car business does not in any way provide a functional or aesthetic relationship to these very important community amenities. I invite you to see this site as a gateway to our community, to the greenway and to the River. It has extraordinary visibility for those transiting the Free Bridge. I encourage you to imagine that there could easily be another profitable and, especially, appropriate use of this land and the small, semi-historic structure that sits on the edge of 250 looking much like a gatehouse. It could be a small walk-up eatery or ice cream shop with outdoor seating. Or another business that caters to the increasing foot, bike and boat traffic. Or it could be a welcome and information center, created, perhaps out of a shared public and private interest in orienting our community, including the business community along this most public stretch of the river towards its, instead of turning its back on it. I have spoken with the developer, Mr. Melton, about my concerns. I have reviewed the site plans with him, and I can see that there has been careful consideration of the roads and the adjacent muffler business. I acknowledge the developer's right and need to find a "good use" for the property. At the same time, please consider this an opportunity to take a courageous look at the question of compatibility with the neighbor on the other side ... the river and its greenway. What happens on this site will signal either a new way of looking to the river, or simply business as usual. Business as usual would allow one more, albiet small, used car lot, joining the phalanx of service stations, fast-food stores and car dealerships that now flank the road towards 1-64. With this decision you can encouraging businesses and activities that face the river and extend its welcome to us. For these reasons, I respectfully ask that you deny these permits. Leslie Middleton 1608 Oxford Road Charlottesville, VA 22903-1330 (434) 293-5770 (434) 293-3079 lesliem @ c stone, net o ? ? Charlotte Swlle TheWaters of ' .... ' Contributed by Kathy Poole We are in the midst of the worst drought in not-se-recent memory. Water has become a precious element that we are scrambling to learn more about because we have no choice. As citizens in oue of "the most liveable cities," we are struggling with ques- tions of who gets ware,; how much, fo,' wlu~t pm'poses, and at what price:Is clean, plentiful water an unquestionable right and privilege of every citizen within the city? Or is it an increasingly limited natural commodity that is subject to the laws of supply and demand like all other products and services in the marketplace? Wihhin private conversations and overheard in semi-public gatherings, troubling words are being uttered about watering sensitive plantings at night so that neighbors do not get upset--and avoiding $500 fines and misdemeanors. There is grumbling from those who feel that they have practiced responsible water conservation for years about "others' who have always wasted water. (I have personally felt the finger-point- ing glares of passersby as I watered newly planted trees from one of my three, roof- fed rain barrels.) In addition, thc latent argtmacnt of business uses being favored over pnivate homeowners and public uses has again become noticeably audible. And the polluted pall over all of these conversations is a fear of uncertain futures that is more unhealthy that the lack of H20. Water--the most permeating and connected natural substauce on earth--is dividing and straining relationships within communities and its citizenry. Yet it need not be this way. Water has a unique ability to build relationships within a community that are biologi- cally healthy and that build a healthier civic life. In terms of biology, if we can achieve scientifically defined, healthy water relationships, then we will maintain or reestablish many if not the majority of the landscape's vital ecological processes. And in terms of civic life, water is, after all, a common resource, something we share as inhabitants of this particular place. Like electricity, roads, and garbage collection, drinking water, storm water management, and sewage disposal, water connects us, physically linking the various parts of'the city and uniting ns as citizens. Were we all better intellectually and emotionally connected to the waters of Charlottesville, we might have avoided our current dire circumstances, in part, because we would have been armed with more knowledge and would have more sen- sitively protected our water resources--long before restrictions were mandated. Were there more opportunities for physically and conceptually engaging water more a part of our daily lives, we would value its qualities beyond being a needed public utility-- its delight, its poetry, its power to connect us with the rest of nature. And most impor- tantly, were water more a part of the public territory of the city, we would value its agency in promoting civic life--those things that promote the common good, things, landscapes, and institutions that express the values that we share as inhabitants of a particular place. The Waters of Charlottesville ©Kathy Poole Water can help us extend our conception of "civic" beyond courthouses, city halls, memorial plazas, park, and libraries--all of which are discrete properties that we can .point to on a map. Water, in its permeability and constantly changing states, is more difficult to point to but is equally important to our common, connected good. Charlottesville is ripe for being better-connected to its water. We are situated between (and to a large degree, defined by) two water courses, the Rivauna River and Moore's Creek. We have public parks located on water courses as well as semi-public facilities like the Ivy Creek Natural Area. We have informed and thoughtful public water offi- cials who are open to environmentally progressive and business supportive ideas. We have active river and environmental advocacy organizations like the Rivanna Trails Organization.the Rlvanna River Roundtable, Piedmont Environmental Council. And initiatives like the Lewis & Clark Exploratory Center (possibly located on the Rivamm's banks) promise growing interest in the ciLv's watch These efforts can be focused and shaped into a city-wide, long-term initiative, into what might be called a Civic Hydrology~ strategy, a plan and a process that trans- forms water from being a problem into a tremendous opportunity for making the city's biological life and its civic life more robust and sustained. KEY PRINCIPLES FOR ESTABLISHING A CIVIC HYDROLO- GY INFRASTRUCTURE 1 PROTECT COMMON RESOURCES Even when they course through private, "owned" land, rivers; creeks, and streams "belong" to all citizens because they provide a basic necessity that we all share. To protect them is to invest in the common good. Therefore, we should identi£y and pro- teet perennial watercourses through public ownership, conservation easements, use regulations, and other creative strategies. Such actions signal to everyone that water is a common good and a common invest- ment that we are united in protecting. These waterside areas, though perhaps not open to public access, become part of the civic territory of the city--on conceptual par with parks, squares, water treatment facilities, and public streets. 2 PUT 'THE PUBLIC' BACK IN PUBLIC WORKS Simply knowing that natural resources need protecting is not enough. Citizens mnst have visual mad physical access to their water bodies to become personally and politi- cally invested in them. Therefore, we should define opportunities for citizens to engage water through a variety of situations and uses like fishing stations, walking trails; scenic viewpoints, and public, parks. We can start bv makine ratb!ic water utilities o~en to nub!ic access--even if it is onlv limited accesS' (even if only visual access in cases of safety issues). Reservoirs are already open to limited public use. Water tower sites and sewage treatment facilities can enjoy similar visitation. Even if citizens cannot visit the workings with appropri- ate supervision during specified times, city residents would learn how the city's water utilities work and make connections beyond the current remote connections of turning on the tap or paying the monthly bill. These efforts have been greatly facilitated in other cities by adopting more environ- mentally supportive stormwater strategies, usually called "natural drainage systems" that liw~t piping and use biofiltration, retention ponds, and stormwater wetlands. These sites, in turn, have been leveraged into public recreation opportunities, most often doubling as parks. Yet, all uses should not be confined to "natural" ones. Opportunities should also include non-profit and for-profit development, provided that it is developed in a public-friendly and environmentally sensitive manner, like educa- tion centers, small commercial, office, and housing. By encouraging public use of "Wet Lands," we allow people to find their own, viscer- al connections with them, to discover reasons for them to not only "know~ them in terms of facts but also ~o care about them--which no amount of dkdactic %nviron- mental education" alone can accomplish. 3 EXPAND USES By includiug among public landscapes the typically disdained activity of stormwater management, we can recognize how a city can revalue the 'castaway' spaces and 'back yard' landscapes. By finding the civic value in these landscapes, they are find- ing new opportunities for civic expression and expanding civic life. Take for example the uses in just one city, Bellevue, Washington: roadside produce stands, a scout cen- ter, commtmity gardens of various types, a blueberry farm--in addition to the. more common nature interpretation center. These kinds of activities welcome citizens of many socioeconomic levels and back- grounds. Just imagine how we might expand the variety of expressions of public land- scapes--offering a variety of landscape expressions in which citizens can exercise more of their rights as citizens and express, challenge, and support more facets of oar particularly American form ul ali on o£ "citizenship." 4 ESTABLISH A CONNECTED ARMATURE Natural systems are healthiest and more robust (able to recover from stresses and dis- turbances) when we maintain their integrity as systems, that is, keep them connected with as few' "breaks" as possible. And if we think of water as a public works infra- structure, hydrological systems thinking presents attractive opportunities. First, it means that its maintenance cost is lowered due to fewer control stmctares, which saves valuable tax dollars. Second, it means that the water system can become a phys- ical and political planning tool that can help organiT~ thecity's growth and develop- ment. In addition, by maintaining the connectivity of the' hydrological network, such a strat- egy can offer its citizens the opportunity to form clear "cognitive maps," mental pie- lures that reinforce their tmderstandings of the city's topography, hydrology, range of ecosystems, and relationships to the larger system of surrounding lakes. Citizens can better understand how city utilities function. By experiencing the water as it rnoves through the place of their city, citizens can better understand how the paris of the city fit together. And by unders__mnding the relationships of these various parts, they can better relate them as a whole--as a civic body shared by all residents. And important- ly, they can better understand their own places in relation to the territo~ of the city. Identify and protect water. Establish a connected network.- Drawing © Kathy Poole/Rodrigo Abela Include public water utility sites. Develop environmentally-friendly alternatives and include them as well. Drawing © Kathy Poole/Rodfigo Abela $ BUILD UPON THE CIVIC HYDROLOGY ARMATURE The civic institutions and spaces of most cities are scattered throughout the urban fab- ric, e.g. courthouses, city halls, public administration buildings, libraries, schools, health departments/clinics. In addition institutions that are not necessarily public but are perceived to be public and/or have'a high value for the community have civic roles, e.g. universities, hospitals, enclosed malls, downtown districts. To most people, their locations seem quixotic and difficult to imagine as a collective. The city's net- work of waterways can form the connev~ve tissue that links these important civic sites, forming the armature upon which to organize the various components of a healthy civic life. Such an armature will make the city's civic spaces clearer and make stronger relationships between these different uses. This armature can be reinforced with other, often existing, more linear infrastructure networks. Bike and pedestrian paths, roads and alleys, and utility easements can make flue Civic Hydrology© armature more accessible and more interconnected. One of the armature's most significant consequences is that by using it to project the location offiaure civic functions, new institutions can have an immediate "place" within the city. And if determined according to lartdscape rather than political oppor- tunities, such a strategy can establish a clearer, less-politicized structure and process for locating civic institutions and city deveiopment~ Once we are more cognizant of our water and the civic culture that it supports--and more invested in it politically, emotionally, socially, and otherwise--then we, the citi- zens, will advance our own initiatives that build the amaature in less official but equally important ways~ Perhaps most importaxttly, we will make our own residences civic territories--despite the fact that they are decidedly private. Yet, our installation of rain barrels, decisions to install permeable surl~aces over runoff-generating paving, choosing of non-water-thirsty naturalized and native plants, and general increase of water recycling and decrease of consumption will make civic territories permeate the city--just like water does. Identify existing civic institutions that are the "building bloc-ks" of the civic armature. Build upon the armature using the waterways as the connective tissue, making the caty's civic spaces clear and related. Drawing © Kathy Poole/Rodrigo Abeta Beyond Charlottesville The potentials for a Civic Hydrology© strategy are not limited to Charlottesville. For other cities the physical, social, and political conditions will be different, require a different process, and result in a unique structure and aesthetic. Yet the design inten- tions for infrastructures span geographies and are rather universal: water as an agent of urban design allows us to accomplish goals beyond economic effi- ciency or even meaningful and complex aesthetics. The point is to mm our problems and fears into positive strategies for city residents to continne developing both the physical structure of the city and thc more impor~nt matter of its civic life. o to advance citizens' understandings and connections to its precious natural resource of water; o to reinforce in the minckq of citizens the city's identity and sensibilities of place; o to help citizens engage their cities and to better articulate their places within it; o to provide more opportunities for citizens to exercise their citizenship. Kathy Poole is a landscape architect trying to keep hydrated itt Charlottesville. She is currently writing a book The Life of Water. Civic lands'capes are her passion. Without addressing issues of civic life, winning the battle over water will be of little consequence. Civic Hydrology~ is merely one way to accomplish the goals of wise use of the declining resource of water--and the larger, perhaps more important goal of better cities. Whether through *,his strategy or another, the point is that approaching RECEIVED AT BOS MEETING Agenda Item #: PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL C(~~ls: Promoting and protecting the Piedmont's rural economy, natural resources, history and beauty Statement to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors September 4, 2002 SP-02-021 and &, Carmichael Motors My name is JeffWerner and I represent the Piedmont Environmental Council. The trend of development near the Rivanna River has been one that dismisses the river. The PEC believes that the time is right to look to the Comp Plan's recommendations to "explore opportunities for river oriented development." I acknowledge that this is a relatively vague suggestion and some might even respond that this applies only to the land south of Free Bridge. Yet, if broadly interpreted, I see it as an opportunity. I have received several phone calls and e-mails about this proposal. I am asked, Why are we continuing to hide the river? Doesn't the future of Pantops hold something better than a strip of fast-food places, gas stations and car dealerships? Most of the riverside development has already turned its back to the river° Those remaining developable riverfront parcels should be looked to for something more than "business-as-usuaL" This proposal provides an opportunity to look to the future of the Growth Area along the river. From that perspective, we encourage the Board to view the river as an asset and not as an unseen, inaccessible ditch from which one may only view the back walls of commercial development. Some have suggested that the riverside should be sacrosanct as a natural buffer. Some have suggested that any riverside development should embrace the river as a place and offer accessible public areas. The riverfront could be lined with shops and restaurants, footpaths and, most importantly, people. My personal vision is one that would combine aspects of both views. This does not suggest that we build shops on steep riverbanks or out on stilts in midstream. For example, the south bank of the James River in Richmond is a system of wooded trails and access points, while on the north bank there are areas where both new and old development embraces the river in the built form. No matter which vision you embrace, neither is possible with a business-as-usual approach. One of the great resources in this town is the University's School of Architecture. This allows all of us access to myriad creative people and creative ideas. I am handing out a sample of work that illustrates an alternative perspective of the river. This work is from a professor of landscape architecture, Kathy Poole, and suggests both graphically and in narrative that the river is a place. Her work is just one of numerous studies of the Rivanna River that have been completed by University scholars and students. Ms. Poole's work describes a "civic hydrology" in words far more eloquent than I can offer in the allotted time. If not for this SP but for future actions, I encourage you to review her summary. I invite you to make your own inquiries to others who have studied this river and to explore the richness of their ideas. There is also a rich history of this waterway and its influence on this place we call home. Good planning and design--yes, growth--can reveal these layers to the public. So, other than referring to the Planning Commission's unanimous denial of this proposal, I offer no specific opposition. My comments are directed to the future of the riverfront as a whole. It is an invitation to explore development that will "render visible" the Rivanna River and not further conceal it behind the concrete block and asphalt of hi this vision of the riverfront as a destination Ral~ahannock 12717 Lcc Highway Washington, VA 22747 ,~0-987-9441 ]~ax: 540-987-9443 Ella Carey From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Diana Foster [dfoster@newventure. com] Tuesday, September 03, 2002 7:52 AM Sally Thomas Ella Carey; Ella Carey; Walter Perkins; Charles Martin; Lindsay Dorder, Dennis Rooker; Dan Mahon SP-2002-021 / request for dev. route 250 Madame Chairman and Supervisors, It is my understanding that the Board of Supervisors will be discussing this week two requests and one appeal regarding development of the comer of Route 250 and Free Bridge Lane as an automobile sales commercial establishment. I encourage you to deny the requests and the appeal as introduced. I would also encourage you to work with the planning and parks departments to preserve this intersection as an attractive, safe, and visible entrance to the county's greenway system. There exists now the opportunity to build a parking lot for trail users that not only serves residents -- especially families - who want to drive to safe hiking or biking but also satisfies riparian concerns. County staff have made great progress over the years and especially recently in obtaining land easements and in laying trail on the ground. To the south of route 250 the county has a continuous chain of easements to State Farm Insurance. There is potential to continue that chain to Glenmore and beyond. They have already cut preliminary trail that provides access to wild and wonderful river buffer vegetation. To the north rudimentary trails lead to and through Darden Towe Park. There is potential to continue the trail beyond. At least three groups of engineers have or are studying the feasibility of building a footbridge from Darden Towe to Pen Parks. Residents of Dunlora have expressed interest to me for connecting trails both east and west from their already established resident-built trail system. Upriver from Duniora, there exists a second attractive opportunity for a county entrance to the greenway system at the intersection of Route 29 and the South Fork of the Rivanna. The County has taken the bold step of making greenways and trails a priority. Greenways have become more than just a green swath on a map. With support from county staff, volunteers are now getting trail on the ground. I believe that a model greenway can happen along the Rivanna all the way from Ivy Creek Natural Area to the James River. Preserving and then developing major road intersections such as the one at-Route 250 as access points are essential to people's learning about the trail system and then working to build more and maintain them. Thank you for your consideration. Diana Foster 400 Balbion Drive Earlysville, Virginia 22936 Telephone 964-1022 Ella Carey From: Sent: To: Subject: Helen Gatling-Austin [hdhara@cstone.net] Friday, August 30, 2002 10:21 PM Sally Thomas; Charles Martin; Lindsay Dorrier; Dennis Rooker, Ella Carey; David Bowerman; Walter Perkins Carrnichael Motors My name is Helen Gatling-Austin and I am a resident of Albemarle County, in Sally Thomas' district. I am writing to ask you to oppose the permit that would allow a used car lot at Parcel 2A of Tax Map 78, the lot on the comer of Rt. 250 and Free Bridge Lane. This is an area where it would be so nice to have some beautiful connection to the river and to the growing greenbelt. Can we please protect this potentially lovely spot by encouraging some other sort of development ~ or maybe even a county-owned enterprise that would support us as citizens - as well as visitors to our city and county - to experience a little pocket of beauty. I've been i~ other cities where urban dvers are glorified. We could do that here. Thank you for your support. VIRGINIA LAND 'COMPANY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE. INC. r~REALTORS 195 RIVERBEND DRIVE · P.O. BOX 8147 · CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22906 TELEPHONE (434) 979-8181 · FAX (434) 296-3510 July 16, 2002 Ella Carey, Clerk Board of County Supervisors Albemarle County, Virginia 401 Mclmtire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 RE: SP-2002-021 Carmichael Motors- Auto Sales SP-2002-030 Carmichaei Motors - Outdoor Storage and Display Sl)P 2002-045 Carmichael Motors Preliminary Site Plan Tax Map 78, 2A Dear Ms. Carey: I would like to request at this time a deferral on the above referenced project that is currently scheduled before the board on August 14, 2002, to be rescheduled to the September 4, 2002 meeting. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Stephen M. Melton cc: Stephen Waller, Planner 07-16-02 PO4 :,..44- RCVB BROKERS - BUILDERS - LAND DEVELOPERS - PROPERTY MANAGEMENT August 13, 2002 Pierce McCleskey 7967 Scottsville Road Scottsville, VA 24590 RE: SP-02-22 20 South Kitchen, Tax Map 102, Parcel 17E Dear Mr. McCleskey: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on August 6, 2002, by a vote of 6:0, recommended appoval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be no on-site sales. 2. There shall be no outdoor storage of materials. 3. All requirements of the Health Department shall be satisfied. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on September 4, 2002. Please note that review of the public hearing items for the September 4th Board meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Steven Biel Planner SB/jcf Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jack Kelsey Steve AIIshouse STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: SP 2002-022 South Kitchen Steven Biel August 6, 2002 September 4, 2002 Applicant's Proposal: The applicant, Mr. Pierce McCleskey, has requested approval of a special use permit for a Home Occupation - Class B, to allow for the operation of a catering kitchen that would operate on a somewhat seasonal basis (less activity January through March and July through August; more activity April through June and September through December). Mr. McCleskey is proposing to construct a 44' x 22' (968 sq. ft.) kitchen to be used for preparing food for events off-site. A private road from Route 20 accesses the site and minimal traffic would be generated by the proposed use. Mr. McCleskey shops for food products at local markets; therefore, there would be limited deliveries to the site. Mr. McCleskey also plans to utilize an on-site garden that would provide fresh produce to be used in food preperation. It would not be necessary to remove any trees in order to construct the proposed kitchen. Presently, Mr. McCleskey does not plan to have any employees on-site, but he would frequently hire contract workers to work off-site at the event. Any future consideration for the hiring of employees would be limited to no more than two employees, which is permitted under the definition of Home Occupation, Class B. Petitions: Request for special use permit to allow a Home Occupation Class B for a catering business, in accordance with Section 10.2.2(31) of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for Home Occupations Class B. The property, described as Tax Map 102-17E, contains 65 acres, and is located in the Scottsville Magisterial District on the east side of Route 20 north of its intersection of Route 708 at 1138 Roundtop Farm. The property is zoned RA Rural Area. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property Rural Area. Character of the Area: The property under review contains 65 acres, and the surrounding area can be characterized as heavily wooded and farmland, with minimal residential development (Attachment D). Planning and Zoning History: The property is located adjacent (northeast) to the Carter's Bridge Agricultural and Forestal District. The Agricultural and Forestal Committee has reviewed the proposed use and has recommended approval of this application. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan identifies this site and surrounding area as being located in the Rural Area. The Comprehensive Plan offers no specific comment regarding home occupations in the Rural Area. However, the level of intensity of the proposed use would be compatible with the character of the Rural Area. SP 2002-22 July 26, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed these requests for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the zoning ordinance and recommends approval of SP 2002-022, based on its consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF COMMENT: Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance: The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property. This proposal would result in a very minimal increase in vehicular traffic, as there would be no on-site sales or customers. However, there would be an occasional delivery of supplies via vans or UPS/FEDEX-type vehicles. The private road from Route 20 to the site would not accommodate larger trucks. Mr. McCleskey would do most of his shopping in local markets to supplement the produce that is grown in his garden. Heavily wooded areas, farmland, and minimal residential development surround the site. The location of the proposed kitchen would not be visible from any adjoining properties as the location of the proposed kitchen is in the interior of the 65-acre parcel. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby, It is the opinion of staff that this home occupation would not result in any increased levels of activity on the site that would be inconsistent with the character of the area. and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent as contained in Chapterl 8, Sections 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 of the Albemarle Zoning Ordinance. In the opinion of staff, the proposed use would not conflict with the purpose and intent as described in the Zoning Ordinance. with the uses permitted by right in the district, This use would not prevent by-right use of the adjacent properties. SP 2002-22 2 July 26, 2002 with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance, Home occupation permits are governed by Section 5.2.2 of the Albemarle Zoning Ordinance. The proposed request complies with the provisions of this section of the Ordinance (Attachment E). and with the public health, safety and general welfare. There would be no adverse impact on public health, safety, and general welfare. The Department of Building Code and Zoning Services, Department of Engineering, Virginia Department of Transportation, and Department of Environmental Services had no particular concerns with this proposed use. The Zoning Department specifically noted that the applicant must reside on the premises while conducting the proposed activity. Mr. McCleskey is scheduled to move into an existing residence on the property August 1, 2002, located near the proposed kitchen (Attachment D). Also, it should be noted his parents own the property and another residence where they reside. SUMMARY: Staff has identified the following factors favorable to this application: The proposal is consistent with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1. The level of intensity of the proposed kitchen would be consistent with the character of the Rural Area. The proposed use would be supportive of agricultural uses, as the applicant would grow produce to be used in the proposed catering business. Staff has not found any factors that are unfavorable to this request. Therefore, staff is able to support this request. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Based on the findings contained in this staff report, staff recommends approval of SP 2002-022, subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be no on-site sales. 2. There shall be no outdoor storage of materials. 3. All requirements of the Health Department shall be satisfied. Attachments: A - Application and Plan B - Location Map C - Tax Map D - Aerial Map E - Regulations Governing Home Occupations SP 2002-22 3 July 26, 2002 County of Albemarle -:- Department of Building Code an 1~%7'~'-'~sz~-p~a ~-~~.,. i ~ ~ Z~ ~,. ~ ~_. f ~. Application for Special Use Permit ATTACHMENT A ~ ~- ! f~ .. ~..,,~ ./,~,~r'~I, Project Name o,,,~, ~,mld *Zoning District (*staff will assist you with these items) Number of acres to be covered by Special Use Permit Is this an ameudment to an existing Special Usc Permit? Are you submitting a site development plan with tiffs application? *Zoning Ordinance Section number requested / O. ~. P.c/_~]) ""/ IContact Person Daytime Phone ( Owner of land (ns listed in the County's records): Daytime Phone ( Fax # c '~ q. '' City ~Jyr/~!-~ State' ¢"~ Zip .E-mail "'-- Daytime Phone ( t-~-I ) ~'6~-.2.O'k.O Fax# Tax map and parcel lc) 3. - _~ 7f' Physical Address ¢ira~sign~l) Locationofproperty¢a,O,~.imergctio~.o~o,h~O e~' ~e_~ Oa- ~h ~05 ~d ~7. "/0~' ~ .~d- Does the owner of this property ow.n, (or have any ownership interest in) any abutting prgperty? If yes, please list thqsetax, map and parcel nu~bers ."/e3 -'. toe's-1'3. ~ p~ae_./f ~ ~rc~/.~a.e-M-~4, t OFFICEUSEONLY 4/] /~ .... History: D S~ial Use Permits: D ~As and Proffers: C! Variances: ff~ttcr of Authorization &~"~ ~ ~' Concurrent review of Site Development Plan? li~es UNo ~/~ q/~)a 401 McIntire Road .:. Charlottesville, VA 22902 .~- Voice: 296-5832 O Fax: 972-4126 Section 31.2.4.1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance states that, "The board of supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provide.d in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the board of supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, that the character of the district will not be changed thereby and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, with the uses permitted by right in the district, with additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of this ordinance, and with the public health, safety and general welfare. The items which follow will be reviewed by the staff in their analysis of your request. Please complete this form and provide additional information which will assist the County in its review of your request. If you need assistance fillingout these items, staff is available. What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property? t~,~/'~, I How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property? How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district surrounding the property? How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance? How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by ri~ district? What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply to this use?. How will this usc promote thc public health, safety, and general welfare of thc community? Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the numbers of persons involved in the USe, operating hours, and any unique features of the use: ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED - provide two(2) copies of each: Recorded plat or boundary survey of the property requested for the rezoning. If there is no recorded plat or boundary survey, please provide legal description of the property and the Deed BoOk and page number or Plat Book and page number. Note: If you are requesting a special use permit only for a portion of the property, it needs to be described or delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing. Ownership information - If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing below has the authority to do so. If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document_ acceptable to the.County must be submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application. If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document accgptable to the County must be submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope%f the agency. OPTION~AL ATTACHMENTS: ~///3. Drawings or conceptual plans, if any.. [~ 4. Additional Information, if any. I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application. I also certifTthat the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my know, ledge. Daytime phone number of Signatory Signature / Printed Name 6 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT Questions on Page 2-3 What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property? Rural How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property? Not at all. Operations will be quiet and unobtrusive, unnoticeable from anywhere. The nearest residence is more than a half mile distant_ Access is by private road direCtly off of Route 20 South. There will be only a very slight increase in traffic, and there will be no large trucks or tractor-trailer rigs coming in (road will not accommodate). How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district surrounding the property? Not at all. As with adjacent property, the enterprise will be unnoticeable to anyone in the district surrounding the property. If there is any affect at all, it would be a positive one since the business will support similar local businesses such as wineries, farmersl ranchers and the like. How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district? As mentioned, the use requested will be harmonious with other, approved local uses--such as wineries, which are 'permitted by right in the district. It will have far less impact than other by-right uses, such as a mobile home or a commercial stable. And because of the extensive use of local growers, safe and sustainable local agriculture will be promoted, which is certainly harmonious with the agricultural uses permitted by right. What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply to this use? The germane portion appears to be Section 5.2, whose provisions this use allows. How will this use promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community? By being a small business that returns far more resources to the community than it consumes, the public health, safety and welfare of that community are ensured through a Iow-impact, farm-friendly, ecologically sound, tax-generating enterprise. 7 Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the number of persons involved in the use, operating hours, and any unique features of the use: This is a modest, strictly off-premise catering kitchen that will operate on a somewhat seasonal basis (slow January through March, busy April through June, slow July and August, busy September through December). Slow months may have $0-1000 gross receipts; busy $2-5000 for a loosely projected $30K gross receipts for the first year, increasing approximately $1 OK per year for 5+ years for a targeted cap of $80-100,000K. No greater levels of business are anticipated nor sought--I have many other demands on my time from the farm, consulting and other projects. Usually, only one person, myself (Pierce McCleskey) will be using the kitchen. For extremely large events I might have one or perhaps (though unlikely) two assistants working for an annual aggregate of well less than 100 hours. The site is reached by a private road directly off Route 20. There will be very little additional traffic. Most of my shopping is done in local markets, and much will be grown in an adjacent garden, so only rarely will deliveries be made to the site, and then only by vans or small trucks because of the winding (private) drive. No clients nor guests will come to the site. The site will not require that a single tree be cut down, and there will be very little additional paving needed. Strict, full recycling will be practiced. No garbage trucks. Runoff from the roof will be captured and used for the garden and livestock. There will be no dishwashing machine, and the well-water used will face a fraction .of the demand that other uses might create. Only pots and pans are being washed--not dishes and glassware, which are rented and returned to the rental company for washing. There will be little activity during the hottest and coldest months of the year, ensudng Iow energy demands. There will be no signage whatsoever other than a (small) name on a mailbox. 8 J~ l0¸ ATTACHMENT C ATTACHMENT D ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE ATTACHMENT E only with the approval of the director of planning and community development; (ii) screened from all lot lines either by the terrain, existing structures, existing vegetation, or by added vegetation approved by the department of planning and community development's landscape planner. (§ 5.1.40, Ord. 01-18(9), 10-17-01) 5.2 HOME OCCUPATIONS 5.2.1 CLEARANCE OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REQUIRED Except as herein provided, no home occupation shall be established without approval of the zoning administrator. Upon receipt of a request to establish a home occupation, Class B, the zoning administrator shall refer the same to the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation for approval of entrance facilities and the zoning administrator shall determine the adequacy of existing parking for such use. No such clearance shall be issued for any home occupation, Class B, except after compliance with section 5.2.3 hereof. (Amended 3-18-81) 5.2.2 REGULATIONS GOVERNING HOME OCCUPATIONS 5.2.2.1 The following regulations shall apply to any home occupation: a. Such occupation may be conducted either within the dwelling or an accessory structure, or both, provided that not more than twenty- five (25) percent of the floor area of the dwelling shall be used in the conduct of the home occupation and in no event shall the total floor area of the dwelling, accessory structure, or both, devoted to such occupation, exceed one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet; provided that the use of accessory slamctures shall be permitted only in connection with home occupation, Class B; b. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the buildings or premises, or other visible evidence of the conduct of such home occupation provided that a home occupation, Class B, may erect one home occupation Class B sign as authorized by section 4.15 of this chapter. Accessory structures shall be similar in facade to a single-family dwelling, private garage, shed, barn or other structure normally expected in a rural or residential area and shall be specifically compatible in design and scale with other development in the area in which located. Any accessory structure which does not conform to the setback and yard regulations for main structures in the district in which it is located shah not be used for any home occupation; c. There shall be no sales on the premises, other than items hand crafted on the premises, in connection with such home occupation; this does not exclude beauty shops or one-chair barber shops; d. No traffic shall be generated by such home occupation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood, and any need for parking generated by the conduct of such home occupation shall be met off the street; e. All home occupations shall comply with performance standards set forth in section 4.14; f. Tourist lodging, nursing homes, nursery schools, day care centers and private schools shall not be deemed home occupations. 5.2.2.2 Prior to issuance of clearance for any home occupation, the zoning administrator shall require the applicant to sign an affidavit stating his clear understanding of and intent to abide by the foregoing regulations. (12-10-80, § 5.2.2; Ord. 01-18(3), 5-9-01) 13 18-5-22.3 Zoning Supplement #17, 10-17-01 ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE 5.2.3 CERTAIN PERMITS REQUIRED No home occupation, Class B, shall be established until a permit shall have been issued'therefor. The provisions of section 5.2.1 of this ordinance shall apply hereto, mutatis mutandis. 5.2.4 REVOCATION The zoning administrator may revoke any clearance or permit issued pursuant to this section, after hearing, for noncompliance with this ordinance or any condition imposed under the authority of this section. 18-5-22.4 Zoning Supplement #17, 10-17-01 August 21,2002 Michael or Bethany Puopolo 3455 Presidents Road Scottsville, VA 24590 RE: SP-2002-031 Puopolo Cottage, Tax Map 103, Parcel 50 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Puopolo: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on August 20, 2002 unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: 4. 5. 6. There shall be no outdoor storage of materials. To limit the amount of business-related vehicular traffic, there shall be no more than four (4) on- site business meetings per month with sales representatives, labor workers, production manager, and other personnel related to the operation of this home occupation. There shall be no on-site sales of materials. Parcels 34M, 50, and 34G shall be combined prior to the issuance of a Zoning clearance for this use. Parcels shall be combined within sixty (60) days after Board of Supervisor approval. Requirements of VODT for sight distance and sight distance easement (if necessary) shall be completed within sixty (60) days after Board of Supervisor approval. The construction of the storage shed, as shown on the sketch plan (Attachment A), shall be completed and all outdoor storage associated with this use shall be contained inside the storage shed within sixty (60) days after Board of Supervisor approval. If all conditions are not met within sixty (60) days after Board of Supervisor approval, the use shall be discontinued. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on September 4, 2002..Please note that review of the public hearing items for the September 4TM Board meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Steven Biel Planner Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jack Kelsey Steve AIIshouse STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: Steven Biel August 20, 2002 September 4, 2002 SP 2002-031 Puopolo Cottage Applicant's Proposal: The applicants, Michael and Bethany Puopolo, have requested approval of a special use permit for a Home Occupation - Class B, to allow for the use of a cottage as an office/guest cottage (approximately 1,200 sq. ft.) and for the outdoor storage of materials used in the applicant's business (Attachment A). The applicant currently operates Liberty Corporation from the primary residence located on Tax Map 103, Parcel 34M with the outdoor storage located on Parcel 50 (Attachment C). Business hours are normally dawn to dusk. The business sells, builds, and maintains a variety of recreational amenities, such as tennis courts, basketball courts, and putting greens. Locally obtained construction materials are generally shipped to specific sites and assembled at the sites. No construction or assembly occurs at the applicant's site. However, the applicant does have unused materials shipped back from the customer site to his property and stores the materials outdoors. Occasionally, materials will be shipped to the applicant's site and then the materials are shipped to the customer site. Also, supplies, such as duct tape, form boards, fencing components, golf cups, and a variety of contracting tools and equipment are stored at the site. The applicant employs two part-time office workers on-site and has a production manager, several salespersons, and labor workers that work off-site and occasionally attend meetings at the applicant's office. Additionally, the cottage has a bedroom that occasionally is used by a prospective dealer while visiting the applicant. Petition: Request for special use permit to allow for an office/cottage in accordance with Section 10.2.2(31) and Section 5.2 of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for a Home Occupation-Class B. The property, described as Tax Map 103, Parcel 50, containing 3.806 acres, Parcel 34M, containing 38.584 acres, and Parcel 34G, containing 30.069 acres, is located in the Scottsville Magisterial District on the south side of Rolling Road (Route 620), approximately 600 feet south of the Route 620 and Route 795 intersection. The property is zoned RA, Rural Areas. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Rural Areas in Rural Area 4. Character of the Area: The property under review contains 3.806 acres. The applicant also owns adjacent Parcels 34M (38.584 ac. and primary residence), and 34G (30.069 ac., the access driveway from Rt. 620 to the cottage crosses through this parcel). All three parcels should be considered in the review of this application. The surrounding area can be characterized as wooded with residential development, as shown by the aerial photo included as Attachment D. 1 Planning and Zoning History: The applicant was cited for a violation in September of 2001 for the operation of a business on property on which the owner does not reside (VIO-2001-262). The applicant filed an appeal and subsequently dropped the appeal. An application was submitted for a special use permit in January of 2002. However, the application was not accepted because the proposal did not meet the definition of a Home Occupation - Class B (Attachment E). The Department of Building Code and Zoning Services issued a Notice of Official Determination of Violation (VIO- 2001-262) on February 13, 2002 (Attachment F). Approval of this application would abate the violation. A Home Occupation - Class A was approved on November 12, 1996, for an architecture office in the primary residence on Parcel 34M (HO-96-327). Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan identifies this site and surrounding area as being located in the Rural Area. The Comprehensive Plan offers no specific comment regarding home occupations in the Rural Area. However, staff is concerned that this use is more consistent with more intensive commercial and industrial uses of the development areas. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. As noted, staff is concerned this use is more consistent with more intensive commercial and industrial uses of the development areas. The applicant has worked with staff to resolve the outdoor storage issue and has proposed to construct a 12' x 22' (264 sq. ft.) shed that the applicant believes would be sufficient for the storage of materials related to the business. The location of the cottage and proposed shed would not be visible from adjoining properties or from Route 620. The applicant has received support from surrounding neighbors and has submitted a petition in support for the approval of the requested special use permit (Attachment G). Staff recommends approval of SP 2002-031 with conditions that would limit the amount of business-related traffic to the site and restrictions on business-related outdoor storage. STAFF COMMENT: Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property. 2 The applicant has the support of all the adjacent property owner's surrounding the applicant's property. Staff believes if conditions are placed on the frequency of business- related traffic and prohibiting outdoor storage related to the business, there would be no substantial detrimental effects to adjacent property owners. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby, Staff believes if conditions are placed on the frequency of business-related traffic and prohibiting outdoor storage related to the business, the character of the district would not be changed. and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent as contained in Chapter 18, Sections 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 of the Zoning Ordinance. In the opinion of staff, the proposed use would be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance with conditions restricting the frequency of business-related traffic and prohibiting outdoor storage related to the business. with the uses permitted by-right in the district, This use would not prevent by-right use of adjacent property. with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance, Home occupation permits are governed by Section 5.2.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant has been provided guidance by the Department of Building Code and Zoning Services as to how to abate the current violation. Approval of SP 2002-031 would abate this violation. Comments from the Department of Building Code and Zoning Services include that this request is subject to Section 5.2 (Attachment H), specifically that the total area of the existing cottage and the proposed storage shed does not exceed 1,500 square feet (Attachment I). The sketch plan indicates the cottage contains approximately 1,200 square feet, while the county real estate records indicate the cottage contains 1,034 square feet. The applicant should verify the correct square footage of the cottage before constructing the proposed storage shed to ensure the total square footage of the cottage and storage shed does not exceed 1,500 square feet. The applicant must also combine Parcels 34M, 50, and 34G so that the activities of the requested special use permit for a home Occupation - Class B occur on the same parcel. 3 and with the public health, safety and general welfare. The Department of Engineering had concerns with possible "other" activities in addition to the home office use. Initially, the Department of Engineering was requesting the applicant submit a site plan to ensure the necessary infrastructure and mitigation are in place to support the uses on the site. After visiting the site, all concerns by the Department of Engineering have been resolved. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has required the entrance to the cottage from Route 620 be upgraded to a minimum standard commercial entrance with 550 feet of sight distance in each direction. A sight distance easement across neighboring property may be required to achieve the sight distance requirements. The applicant has discussed these requirements with VDOT and has agreed to comply with all VDOT requirements. SUMMARY: Staff has found the following factors that are favorable to this application: The applicant has the support of adjacent property owners to continue to operate the business as a home occupation. The applicant has been cooperative in working with staff to resolve the outdoor storage issue and to abate the current violation. The applicant has proposed to construct a storage shed to satisfy the outdoor storage issue and will limit the amount of business-related vehicular traffic to the site. Staff has found the following factors that are unfavorable to this request: The use is more consistent with commercial or industrial uses found in the development areas. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Based on the findings contained in this staff report, staff recommends SP 2002-031 be approved, subject to the following conditions: There shall be no outdoor storage of materials. To limit the amount of business-related vehicular traffic, there shall be no more than four (4) on-site business meetings per month with sales representatives, labor workers, production manager, and other personnel related to the operation of this home occupation. There shall be no on-site sales of materials. 4 Parcels 34M, 50, and 34G shall be combined prior to the issuance of a Zoning clearance for this use. Parcels shall be combined within 45 days after Board of Supervisor approval. All requirements of VDOT (i.e., commercial entrance requirements, sight distance, sight distance easement). Attachments: A - Application and Plan B - Location Map C - Tax Map D - Aerial Photo E - Zoning Letter F - Violation Notice G - Petition H - Regulations Governing Home Occupations ! - Zoning Comments J - Outdoor Storage Photos 5 County of Albemarle 4- Department of Building Code ant OFFICE USKONLY _ -- Application for Special Use Permit *Zoning District g~,~ [ '~r~ *Zoning Ordinance Secfion number requ~ted ~.~.~ C'15 ATTACHMENT A Date (*staff will assist you with these items) Number of acres to be covered by Special Use Permit (ifa porlion ~1 m"q be dclin~atlM on plat) IS this an amendmentlo an existing Special Use Permit? ,Are you submitting a site diwelopment plan with. this application? ~i~esU~o Address '~9/'(~-~ ?('t~'(J4'¢.{-~ '~ City ~(-~~' · State ~ Zip~-'~o DaytimePhone(42gd4-) Cq~-~,~,a}q Fax# q'q,~,Sb'2,3 E-mail ~).[TU0?gtg~, Ps0L.rO, Applicant (Who is thc contact person representing? Who is requesting die special us~?): ?~[OFO [43 l State Zip Daytime Phone ( ) ' · Fax #. .E-mail Does the owner of this property own (or have any OWller~s~ interest'in) any ~/butting property7 those tax map and parcel numbers "[-~J~ ]0;~'~ --~.. iq j ~70AFtZ{~. ~)q ~, If yes, please list 121Vfirian'ces: ' LZr"5 ~ , - '"" ~tte~ of Authorization ~/~;¢¢/g)12, Concurrent review of Site. Development Plan9. 121 Yes El No 401 Mclntire Road *> Chm'lottesville. VA 22902 o~. Voice: 296-5832 4. Fax: 972-4126 Section 31.2.4.1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance state's that, "The board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses ak provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the board of supervisors. that such use will not be of'substantial detriment to adjacent property, that the character of the district will not be changed thereby and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, with the uses permitted by right in the district, With additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of this ordinance, and with the. public health, safety and general welfare. The items which follow will be'review.cd'by the staff in their analysis of y~ur request. Please complete this form and provide additional infor.matiqn which will assist the County in its review of your reques, t.' If you need assistance filling out these items, staff is available. What is the Compreh.ensive Plan designation for this property? ~2'px ~ Ho~; will the proposed special use ~ffect adja~e~t property? kt~/~il B/or t~/~'~c/~,o . ]~';~P'ITI°Ot~-~/! How will.the proposed special use' affect the character of the district surrounding the property'~ h~/l {4 la,O~ -~ ~8(j~"' - How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance? How is the use in harmony with th.e uses permitted by right in the district? What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 0fthe zoning Ordinance apply to this use? How will this use promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community? 7 Describe your request, in detail and'include all pertinent information such as the numbers of persons involved in the use, operating hour~, and any unique features of the use: ATrACH34ENTS. RE(~UIRED - provide two(2) copies of each: Recorded plat or bot/ndary survey of the property requested for the rezoning. If there is no recorded plat or boundary survey, please provid, e legal description of the property and the Deed Book and page number or Plat Book and page number. Note: If you are requesting a special use permit only .for a portion of the property, it needs to be described or delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing. Ow .nershi.'p information - If ownerihip of the property is in the,name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a. fictitious name, a- document acceptable to the County must be submitted 'certifying that the person signing below has the authority to do so. If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the. County mus.t be submitted containing the owner's w~n-consent to the application. If the applicant is the agent o~7 the w- '-- o4 o ._e~-~-.,.,gqument acceptable to the County must be submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency. OPTIONAL ATTACHMENTS: ~/ 3. Drawingsorconceptualplans, ifany.. [ : ZO. O F~ ~ [ .~ l~a Flay'7 [~ 4. Additional lnformation,.if any. t~lt'/(-~ J~ e~t4/t~r a~g~gtt~r0~)0t// I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have the-legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application. I also ce_,rtify that the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my Signature ~r~ Date erin[qd Nan~e, '" .. /4 r.e ? ,,foio'''''' Daytime phone number of Signatory. Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the numbers of persons involved in the use, operating hours, and any unique features of the business: We propose to combine our parcels (Tax Map 103, parcels 50, 34-E, G, H, I, J, M and lot 14) to allow us to consider them our premises under the Albemarle County Zoning Departments' interpretation of the legal defin/tion of premises. That would allow us use our cottage on parcel 50 as an office/guest cottage if we are granted a special use permit. The three parcels total nearly seventy-five acres and none of the existing buildings (or proposed future buildings) are within site of the road or any adjoining property owners. We wish to operate Liberty Corporation from our property. Liberty Corporation is a Class A specialty contractor licensed by the State of Virginia. We sell, build, and maintain a variety of recreational amenities ranging from tennis courts to bocce courts. Also including basketball, croquet, and putting greens. We have been in business since 1986 and work all over the country. Our projects are constructed of locally obtained construction materials and specialty sports surfaces and products. We generally ship the specialty products to the specific job for which they have been purchased but occasionally take delivery of them at our office to transport from here. We also stock supplies such as duct tape, form boards, fencing components, golf cups, and a variety of contracting tools and equipment. While our products are generally designed to be installed and withstand the worst weather, we would like to build a barn/storage building to store.them until we take them to the job-site for which they have been purchased. By combining the parcels we hope to obtain approval for the covered storage building at some point in the future. We employ more people in the building season than during the winter, but our normal staff would include me, two part-time office people, a production manager and a variety of salespeople and labor that would not normally be at our office unless for a meeting. Although I tend to work a lot, our normal hours of operation are from dawn to dusk. We have a dealer network around the country and occasionally one of them, or a prospective new dealer will visit to leam about our business. The cottage has a guest bedroom that allows us to house them there. \ Pipe .Fnd. ' ' -~,,,,,, . ,?~.~, . . . % ',, ',, '. · 4:::,. ' " . ', ", 'x' JO. Ct< .,. "-I ~, ~. ,-- . / ' ~ , , . \ rn~,. - / ' 0 ~' ~% '' ~" -. · ~ ~, '' ,,',, ' '~C~& ~ ' ~' "' 5~:' '" :" '",i"', . / "<"~ o, · .: ',,,. / i ~ *~ , .,. IS~-'-~-': "--//~'-~:: ¢^ / -i .~, .o~o,._,.;..:~~..?.-'-..~?/ i . ~-~. ~.~.~'.?'-., .~'~ ~;/ ! ' p~lo ~ ~ o~ .~~~,.'/ _..x,. ~ ~ ~/ i . ~-F~d. I,/ ~~¢:~. / ~L.-'~4.7 ~ -__1- ~2 /~'$~',m ~.. /~ Fr'. ~[~9. " / . . . . B ~o ~ \ [ ,i" i/ ,/ / :./ 12 ATTACHMENT D FAX (434) 972-4126 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Building Code and Zoning Services 401 Mclntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 TELEPHONE (434) 296-5832 ATTACHMENT E TTD (434) 972-4012 February 4, 2002 Bethany Puopolo P.O. Box 75 Charlottesville, VA22902 RE: SP-2002-002 Dear Ms. Puopolo: This letter is to inform you that your application for a special permit for a home occupation can not be accepted because your proposal does not meet the definition of Home Occupation, Class B. The basis for that decision is contained in a letter dated October 22, 2001 to Mr. Puopolo from William Fritz. A copy of that letter is enclosed. In the course of reviewing this matter, I have identified several optiOns you may pursue. These include the following. I am sure there'are other approaches as well. You may combine the residence parcel with the parcel containing the accessory structure. You may adjust the boundary line so that the accessory structure and the residence are on the same parcel. · You may request a written determination regarding the definition of Home Occupation. The fee for the special permit will be refunded to you. Please contact me if you have questions or wish to discuss this further. Sincerely, Manager of Zoning Administration h\DEPT~Building & Zoning\Determination General\103-50 Poulopo SP-02-02.doc FAX (434) 972-4126 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Building Code and Zoning Services 401 McI_ntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Vkginia 22902-4596 TELEPHONE (434) 296-5832 ATTACHMENT F TrD (434) 972-4012 NOTICE OF OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF VIOLATION Date Notice of Determination is given: February 13, 2002 CERTIFIED MAIL # 7000 1530 0005 4546 3300 Michael D. or Bethany J. Puopolo 3455 Presidents Road Scottsville, Va. 24590 No: VIO-2001-262 Property: 10300-00-00-05000 same Tax Map and Parcel Number Owner of Record You are hereby notified that after an investigation of the above-described property, the Zoning Administrator has determined that the following constitutes a violation of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance: The operation of abusiness on property on which the owner does not reside. Section 10,2 Permitted Uses (in Rural Area District); This business is not a permitted use in RA district and it does not qualify as a home occupation.. Therefore this use shall not exist on this site. Section 36.1: "Any building erected contrary to any of the provisions of this ordinance or contrary to any condition imposed upon any conditional rezoning, issuance of a special use permit or approval of a site plan, and any use of any building or land which is conducted, operated or maintained contrary to any of the prowsions of this ordinance or any condition imposed upon any conditional rezoning, issuance of a special use permit or approval of a site plan, shall be a violation of this ordinance and the same is hereby declared to be unlawful° The zoning administrator may initiate injunction, mandamus, abatement, criminal warrant or any other appropriate action to prevent, enjoin, abate or remove such erection or use in violation of any provision of this ordinance." I5 VI0--2001-:262 Page 2 February 13, 2002 You are hereby ordered to cease and desist from the operation of your business on this parcel by February 26, 2002 and have the pro2verty in compliance by March 29, 2002. Your timely compliance with this order does not excuse the violation cited herein and does not preclude the County from pursuing further legal action for these violations. If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have a right to appeal it within thirty (30) days of the date notice of this determination is given, in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of the Code of Virginia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the grounds for the appeal. An appeal application must be completed and filed along with the fee of $95. The date notice of this determination was given is specified above. If you have any questions, please contact Keith Lancaster at 434-296-5832. Amelia G. McCulley, Zoning Administrator ,~.,County of Albemarle, Virginia Reading Fi!e: Vio-2001-262 i6¸ ATTACHMENT G M/ke & Bethany Puopolo 3455 Presidents Road Scottsville, VA 24590 979-4836 (Mike) July 28, 2002 Dear Neighbor, You may have noticed the signs at the entrance to our driveway(s) about an Albemarle County hearing. The hearipg is to determine whether t will be allowed to continue to use the cottage (Mrs. Jones. old house), which I purchased several years ago, as an office for my business and a guest cottage. My business is to build "sports things" like basketball and tennis c,ourts. Because the business is not agricultural, we need to obtain a special use permit. I have been doing exactly the same things that I want to continue to do for the past few years. The change is that the Coun~ now knows about. it and requires a spec/al permit. I should probably mention that I have always had a business license with the county and paid taxes, they just didn't know where my office was. ! am attaching a copy of the application that we filled out with the county. If you don't object to our continued use, then please sign the "okay by me" sheet. If you do have any additional concerns, then please give me a call to make sure that I understand them and keep you happy. My number is 979 4836. We have always treated our neighbors the way we would like to be treated. Thank you for your time, and hopefully, help. Sincerely} Mike Puopolo Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the numbers of per..sons involved in the use, operating hours, and any unique features of the business: We propose to combine our parcels (Tax Map 103, parcels 50, 34-E, G, H, I, J, M and lot 14) to allow us to consider them our premises under the Albemarle County Zoning Departments' interpretation of the legal definition of premises. That would allow us use our cottage on parcel 50 as.'an office/guest cottage if we are granted a special use permit. The three parcels total nearly seventy-five acres and none of the existing buildings (or proposed future buildings) are within site of the road or any adjoining property owners. We ,wish to operate Liberty Corporation from our property. Liberty Corporation is a Class A specialty contractor licensed by the State of'Virginia. We sell, build, and maintain a variety of recreational amenities ranging from tennis Courts to bocce courts. Also including basketball, croquet, and putting greens. We have been in business since 1986 and work all over the country. Our projects are constructed of locally obtained construction materials and specialty sports ~uffaces and products. We generally ship the specialty products to the specific job for which they have been purchased but occasionally take delivery of them at our office to transport from here. We also stock supplies such as'duct tape, form boards, fencing components, golf cups, and a variety of contracting tools and equipment. While our products are generally designed to be installed and withstand the worst weather, we would like to build a barn/storage building to store ~em until we take them to the job-site for which they have been purchased. By combining the parcels we hope to obtain approval for the covered stOrage building at some point in the future. We employ more people in the building season than during the. winter, but our normal staff would include me, two part-time office people, a production manager and a variety of salespeople and labor that would not normally be at our office unless for a meeting. Although I tend to work a lot, our normal hours of operation are from dawn to dusk. We have a dealer network around the country and occasionally one of them,- or a prospective new dealer will visit to learn about our business. 'The cottage has a guest bedroom that allows us to house them there. I am in support of Mike.and Bethany Puopolo's speciai use application regarding the use of their property.at Slate Hill. RE: SPecial Use Perrrfit (SP 2002,03 !) · ' July 28, 2002 AUG-4-2002 03:04P· FROM:MORTON QUALITY MOME 29~-6468 ,TO:D2E33~3 P:lxi- I am in supj~o~ of Mike aud Bedmny Puopolo's speci~[ use application re~din~ the ~ of thor PrOl:~t~ at $1a~ Hill. RE: Special Use Permit (SP 2002-03 2 · 2O I am 'in Support of Mike and Bethany Puopolo's special use application regarding the use of their property at,Slate Hill. RE: Special Use Permit (SP 2002-031) July 28, 2002 $i~a~¢/. ~,w~4../ ~~(~ Printed Address 2_l I am 'in'support of Mike and Bethany Puopolo's special use application regarding the use of their property at Slate Hill. RE: Special Use Permit (SP 2002-031) July 28, 2002 Signature ~~ Printed Address i ¢/V~'~(L~~ ¥~ I am in ~UpPort of Mike and Bethany Puopolo's special use application regarding the use of their property at Slate Hill. RE: Special Use Permit (SP 2002-031) July 28, 2_0~2/~ F-~x · ':,. Signa~/~¢/q0~'~ )(j~ ~. Printed I am 'in support of Mike and Bethany Puopolo's' special use application regarding the use of their property at Slate Hill. RE: Special Use Permit (SP 2002-031) r Address Printed I am 'in support of Mike and Bethany Puopolo's special use application regarding the use of their property at Slate Hill. RE: Special Use Permit (SP 2002-031) ~ I am in support of Mike and Bethany pUopolo's special use application regarding the use of their property at Slate Hill. RE: Special Use Permit (SP 2002-031) July28,~~~~ ~~_,~~' . --: "_ .' z -- ~'~ ~:~'*'~ /~ Address .~t¢ ~ t ~,~~~-~,~. ~~ ' '-26 I am 'in support of Mike and Bethany Puopolo's special use application regarding the use of their property at Slate Hill. RE: Special Use Permit (SP 2002-031) July 28, 2002 A ' ' A ddress,'~ :'~"~ ~~c_-~ ATTACHMENT H ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE only with the approval of the director of planning and community development; (ii) screened from all lot lines either by the terrain, existing structures, existing vegetation, or by added vegetation approved by the department of planning and community development's landscape planner. (§ 5.1.40, Ord. 01-18(9), 10-17-01) 5.2 HOME OCCUPATIONS 5.2.1 CLEARANCE OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REQUIRED Except as herein provided, no home occupation shah be established without approval of the zoning administrator: Upon receipt of a request to establish a home occupation, Class B, the zoning administrator shall refer the same to the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation for approval of entrance facilities and the zoning administrator shall determine the adequacy of existing parking for such use. No such clearance shall be issued for any home occupation, Class B, except after compliance with section 5.2.3 hereof. (Amended 3-18-81) 5.2.2 REGULATIONS GOVERNING HOME OCCUPATIONS 5.2.2.1 The following regulations shall apply to any home occupation: Such occupation may be conducted either within the dwelling or an accessory structure, or both, provided that not more than twenty- five (25) percent of the floor area of the dwelling shall be used in the conduct of the home occupation and in no event shall the total floor area of the dwelling, accessory structure, or both, devoted to such occupation, exceed one th°Usand five hundred (1,500) square feet; provided that the use of accessory structures shall be permitted only in connection with home occupation, Class B; There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the buildings or premises, or other visible evidence of the conduct of such home occupation provided that a home occupation, Class B, may erect one home occupation Class B sign as authorized by section 4.15 of this chapter. Accessory structures shall be similar in facade to a single-family dwelling, private garage, shed, barn or other structure normally expected in a rural or residential area and shall be specifically compatible in design and scale with other development in the area in which located. Any accessory structure which does not conform to the setback and yard regulations for main structures in the district in which it is located shall not be used for any home occupation; There shall be no sales on the premises, other than items hand crafted on the premises, in connection with such home occupation; this does not exclude beauty shops or one-chair barber shops; No traffic shall be generated by such home occupation in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood, and any need for parking generated by the conduct of such home occupation shall be met offthe street; e. All home occupations shall comply with performance standards set forth in section 4.14; 5.2.2.2 f. Tourist lodging, nursing homes, nursery schools, day care centers and private schools shall not be deemed home occupations. Prior to issuance of clearance for any home occupation, the zoning adminisl~,ator shall require the applicant to sign an affidavit stating his clear understanding of and intent to abide by the foregoing regulations. (12-10-80, § 5.2.2; Ord. 01-18(3), 5-9-01) 18-5-22.3 Zoning Supplement #17, 10-17-01 28 ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE 5.2.3 CERTAIN PERMITS REQUIRED No home occupation, Class B, shall be established until a permit shall have been issued therefor. The provisions of section 5.2.1 of this ordinance shall apply hereto, mutatis mutandis. 5.2.4 REVOCATION The zoning administrator may revoke any clearance or permit issued pursuant to this section, after hearing, for noncompliance with this ordinance or any condition imposed under the authority of this section. 1 $-5-22.4 Zoning Supplement # 17, 10-17-01 2,9 ~'~ ATTACHMENT I Albemarle County Development Departments s P-2002-031 SPIN Submission and Comments Puopolo¢ottage-HomeOocB Zoning Special Use Permit revision,3 reviewer received reviewed decision John Shepherd 6/6/02 The Zoning Administrator has issued a Notice of Official Determination of Violation (VIO-2001-262) for "The operation of a business on property on which the owner does not reside. This business is not a permitted use in: the RA district and it does not qualify as a home occupation. Therefore this use shall not exist on this site." Approval of this application will abate the violation. Currently, the dwelling is on Parcel 34M, the cottage with the office is located on Parcel 50 and the applicant may propose to use Parcel 34G fora storage building. In order to meet the definition of home occupation, the parcel containing the dwelling must be combined with the parcel(s) containing the activities and uses associated with the home ocupation. The combination of these parcels into one must be made a condition of approval of this request. Please either set some specific time, based on the applicants' diligent effort to combine the parcels, by which business license and zoning clearance must be obtained or identify some hard date by which time the SP expires if the clearance for the-home occupation is not obtained. (Note: a zoning clearance must be approved to consider the home occupation initiated.) This Class B Home Occupation is subject to Section 5.2. Please assure that the review and recommended conditions cover the provisions of 5.2.2.1. In particular, be certain that the total of the area in the existing accessory structure used for this home occupation plus any proposed storage area that is used for the home occupation does not exceed 1,500 square feet. If th e combined areas used for the home occupation exceeds 1,500 square feet, the applicant must request a waiver of section 5.2.2.1 a pursuant to section 5.1 .b.1 from the Board of Supervisors. County real estate records indicate that the cottage contains 1,034 square feet. Section 5.2.2.1 b requires that there shall be no change in the outside appearance of the buildings or premises, or other visible evidence of the conduct of such home occupation. If outdoor storage of materials associated with this request is proposed, the applicant must request a waiver of section 5.2.2.1 b pursuant to section 5.1 .b.1 from the Board of Supervisors. HO-96-327 was approved on November 12, 1996. This is for an architecture office in the main dwelling that qualifies as a Class A home occupation. It is recommended that all outdoor lighting ass°ciated with this application comply with the outdoor lighting regulations of Section 4.17. Please contact me if you have questions or require further information. 3O 7/30/02 10:16 AM Page 1 of I - August 21,2002 Greg Baldwin 115 S Pantops Drive, Suite A-2 Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: SP-2002-033 Bentivar Suvdivision - Reconfiguration; Tax Map 46, Parcels 135, 136, 137, 137A and 138A Dear Mr. Baldwin: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on August 20, 2002, unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: The development rights granted by this special use permit shall be used in lieu of the six (6) remaining theoretical development rights on the property. Driveways in the proposed reconfiguration shall be separated by a minimum of 75 feet. The applicant shall secure a signed final plat for the proposed division within two years of the approval date of this permit, or this permit shall expire. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on September 4, 2002. Please note that review of the public hearing items for the September 4th Board meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Scott Clark Planner SC/jcf Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jack Kelsey Steve AIIshouse Staff Contact: Planning Commission: Board of Supervisors: Scott Clark August 20, 2002 September 4, 2002 SP 02-033 BENTIVAR SUBDIVISION RECONFIGURATION APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to reconfigure six lots in the Bentivar subdivision. The reconfiguration is not possible by right, as the development rights of the lots being reconfigured would need to be transferred outside their original parent parcels. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The property, described as Tax Map 46 Parcels 135, 136, 136A, 137, 137A, and 138A, contains 14.315 acres, and is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District on Bentivar Drive [Route # 1033] approximately 800 feet from the intersection of Route 1033 and Route 643. The parcels total approximately 14.3 acres. HISTORY On February 5, 2002, the County received an application for a final plat to reconfigure these lots. This application has been deferred because of the development-right issues. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This area is designated as Rural Area by the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of SP 02-033 with conditions. STAFF COMMENT Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance below. Note: All analysis assumes that this permit would be approved with conditions requiring that the original six development rights be replaced by the newly-granted rights and abandoned for perpetuity. The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue afl special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, This proposal would not change the number of houses to be built on the properties, and so would not significantly change the expected level of impact on surrounding parcels. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby, The rural character of this area has already been significantly compromised by suburban development. This proposal would not change the character of its surroundings. and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, Although this application does not actively attempt to meet the purpose and intent of the Ordinance or of the Rural Areas zoning district, it is not significantly different from the by- right development already approved for this site. with the uses permitted by right in the district, The result of this proposal would be residential development, a by-right use in this district. with additional regulations provided in Section 5. 0 of this ordinance, There are no applicable supplemental regulations in Section 5.0. and with the public health, safety and general welfare. Reconfiguration of this subdivision would not change the public health, safety, or welfare impacts compared to already-approved development of this land. The Engineering Department recommends that driveways be separated by a minimum of 75 feet to ensure that traffic and stormwater impacts do not change. The Virginia Department of Health requires that a soil study by a certified soils consultant be carried out to determine suitability for septic systems and well locations. This proposal would add a new internal road for access to the parcels, which in their current layout would be accessed from Bentivar Drive. Section 10.5.2 of the Zoning Ordinance permits the Board of Supervisors to approve additional development rights on lots in the RA zoning district outside of drinking-water watersheds. Staff will address the criteria provided in that section below: 10.5.2 WHERE PERMITTED BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT 10.5.2.1 The board of supervisors may authorize the issuance of a special use permit for: (Amended 11-8-89) More lots than the total number permitted under section 10.3.1 and section 10.3.2; provided that no such permit shaft be issued for property within the boundaries for the watershed of any public drinking water supply impoundment; and/or (Added 11-8-89) b. More development lots than permitted under section 10. 3.3.3. b. (Added 11-8-89) The board of supervisors shaft determine that such division is compatible with the neighborhood as set forth in section 31.2.4.1 of this ordinance with reference to the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan relating to rural areas including the type of division proposed and specifically, as to this section only, with reference to the following: (Amended 11-8-89) The size, shape, topography and existing vegetation of the property in relation to its suitability for agricultural or forestal production as evaluated by the United States Department of Agriculture Soft Conservation Service or the Virginia Department of Forestry. The property's topography is not prohibitive for agriculture or forestry. However, its size and suburban context make it largely unusable for economically viable agriculture or forestry. The actual suitability of the soft for agricultural or forestal production as the same shaft be shown on the most recent published maps of the United States Department of Agriculture Soft Conservation Service or other source deemed of equivalent reliability by the Soft Conservation Service. The site includes soils of varying productivity (ranging from a high of productivity class II to a Iow of class VI). The historic commercial agricultural or forestal uses of the property since 1950, to the extent that is reasonably available. The key point here is that the surrounding area has already been converted to suburban residential use. If located in an agricultural or forestal area, the probable effect of the proposed development on the character of the area. For the purposes of this section, a property shaft be deemed to be in an agricultural or forestal area if fifty (50) percent or more of the land within one (1) mile of the border of such property has been in commercial agricultural or forestal use within five (5) years of the date of the application for special use permit. In making this determination, mountain ridges, major streams and other physical barriers which detract from the cohesiveness of an area shaft be considered. The relationship of the property in regard to developed rural areas. For the purposes of this section, a property shaft be deemed to be located in a developed rural area if fifty (50) percent or more of the land within one (1) mile of the boundary of such property was in parcels of record of five (5) acres or less on the adoption date of this ordinance. In making this determination, mountain ridges, major streams and other physical barriers which detract from the cohesiveness of an area shaft be considered. Staff analysis shows that 45.61 percent of the land within one mile of this property is in commercial agricultural or forestal use. Therefore, this land is not considered to be an agricultural or forestal area. Only 46 percent of the land within one mile was developed into parcels 5 acres or smaller on the adoption date of the zoning ordinance, therefore the area is also not considered a developed rural area. Many of the smaller lots within the mile radius are separated from this site by the South Fork Rivanna River. The relationship of the proposed development to existing and proposed population centers, services and employment centers. A property within areas described below shall be deemed in proximity to the area or use described: a. Within one mile roadway distance of the urban area boundary as described in the comprehensive plan; (Amended 11-8-89) The site is not within one mile of the urban area boundary. b. Within one-half mile roadway distance of a community boundary as described in the comprehensive plan; (Amended 11-8-89) The area is approximately 0.3 miles from the boundary of the Hollymead community. c. Within one-half mile roadway distance of a village as described in the comprehensive plan. (Amended 11-8-89) The site is not within one-half mile of a village. 7. The probable effect of the proposed development on capital improvements programming in regard to increased provision of services. Assuming that the original six development rights are abandoned, this reconfiguration would not actually create more lots than have already been permitted. Therefore, no increased services or facilities would be required. The original six lots are considered developable in a by-right situation. 8. The traffic generated from the proposed development would not, in the opinion of the Virginia Department of Transportation: (Amended 11-8-89) a. Occasion the need for road improvement; b. Cause a tolerable road to become a nontolerable road; c. Increase traffic on an existing nontolerable road. Changing the layout of the same number of lots will not change traffic levels or road conditions. The Virginia Department of Transportation has no comments on this project. With respect to applications for special use permits for land lying wholly or partially within the boundaries for the water shed of any public drinking water impoundment, the following additional factors shall be considered: The site is not located in the watershed of a public drinking water impoundment. SUMMARY This request results in the relocation of development rights in the Rural Area, through a reconfiguration of six existing parcels, and a new internal road serving the new parcels. If the original development rights are abandoned, this proposal will have no significant additional impact. RECOMMENDED ACTION The Planning Department recommends approval of SP 02-033 with the following conditions: 1. The development rights granted by this special use permit shall be used in lieu of the six (6) remaining theoretical development rights on the property(ies). 2. Driveways in the proposed reconfiguration shall be separated by a minimum of 75 feet. 3. The applicant shall secure a signed final plat for the proposed division within two years of the approval date of this permit, or this permit shall expire. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map, including current parcel layout B. Applicant's proposed parcel layout SION 9N '-.% " 3ARRSBR30K ,,..':: ATTACHMENT A 3IHdYB9 9P H± 882 9P NI OMi 3S~Hd G 10~ OMI ~S~Hd 9 lOq 0 S3M3¥ 868'8 IN3H3SV3 39¥NIYBO S3~JD¥ 022' 2 ¥ Um_L / 103 S3~3¥ ~0~'~ 3 \xlO-1 \ 39¥NIYBQ I \ W3¥ IIV'E O\lOq VGE~ -IqOHYd 917 H1 Bg2 109 IN3N3SV3 \ 39¥NIVU0 \ \ 3 g9~ '~ J~lOl / ORDINANCE NO. 02- E(1) AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THAT A VIOLATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 33 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA ON AUGUST 30, 2002 SHALL BE A CLASS 3 MISDEMEANOR IN THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Honorable Mark R. Warner, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, issued Executive Order Number 33, Declaration of a State of Emergency Due to Extreme Drought Conditions Throughout the Commonwealth, effective August 30, 2002; and WHEREAS, Section C of Executive Order Number 33 prohibits any person or household who utilizes surface waters or ground water in Albemarle County from watering lawns, washing vehicles, filling swimming pools, and irrigating golf courses with the following exceptions: commercial car washes, pools used by health care facilities for patient care and rehabilitation, and watering of golf course tees and greens between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; and WHEREAS, Section C of Executive Order Number 33 further provides that Albemarle County may establish, collect, and retain fines for a violation of the restrictions promulgated therein; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County finds that a violation of Executive Order Number 33 should parallel a violation of Albemarle County Code Section 16-500, Conservation of Water During Emergencies, and be enforced as a Class 3 Misdemeanor; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors further finds that an emergency exists requiring the adoption of this Ordinance without prior published notice pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.2-1427. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED THAT: (1) A violation of any restriction on the use of surface waters or ground water set forth in Section C of Executive Order Number 33 issued by the Honorable Mark R. Warner, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, effective August 30, 2002, or as it thereafter may be amended, shall be a Class 3 Misdemeanor in the County of Albemarle, Virginia and the County shall prosecute and enforce these restrictions and collect and retain fines for violations of these restrictions. (2) The County Executive is authorized and directed to enforce the restrictions in Albemarle County by utilizing County employees and resources as he deems necessary. (3) This Ordinance shall take effect immediately, being adopted under emergency procedures pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.2-1427, and shall remain in effect not longer than sixty days unless readopted in conformity with the applicable provisions of the Virginia Code. I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of six to zero, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on September 9, 2002. Clerk, Board of County Supervisors Aye Mr. Bowerman X Mr. Dorrier X Mr. Martin X Mr. Perkins X Mr. Rooker X Ms. Thomas X NaY