HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP199700055 Action Letter
VOIDED
PERMIT
..
.J
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Building Code and Zoning Services
401 McIntire Road, Room 223
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Building Code Information
(804) 296-5832
FAX (804) 972-4126
TID (804) 972-4012
Zoning Information
(804) 296-5875
December 10, 1997
Joseph B. F. Phillips, AlA
Osteen Phillips Architects
108 Second Street SW No. 35
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Re: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION
Golf Netting and Poles in the Floodway
Tax map 78, Parcel 15C 1
Dear Joe:
This letter serves to take a position and offer a written determination from which the
parties in interest will either be satisfied, or if aggrieved may seek an appeal. It is my
opinion, after review of the information submitted with your site plan, your letter of
November 13, 1997 and the manufacturers information submitted December 9, 1997, that
the poles and barrier netting associated with your golf driving range cannot be located in
the Flood Hazard Overlay District.
The preliminary site plan for this project, prepared by your firm and dated 10/16/97,
proposes a series of 19 poles, along a distance of approximately 900 feet, to be used for
hanging barrier netting in the Flood Hazard Overlay zoning district. This is shown as "75'
barrier netting" on the plan. You have stated in your letter that these poles and barrier
netting constitute a "fence" and further that both fences and driving ranges are allowed by
right in the floodway as stated in Sections 30.3.5.1.1 (2) and (4). Your other supporting
statement notes that utility poles, which are similar to your poles, are allowed by right in
the floodway.
It is my opinion that the proposed structure including the poles and barrier netting
which are intended to "catch" golf balls is NOT a fence. It is also my opinion that
this structure is a commercial structure like any other and not allowed in the Flood
Hazard Overlay zoning district.
There are many fences in Albemarle County, however, there is no similar structure to
what you are requesting. The fences found in our county and anticipated by our
ordinance are generally four to six feet in height, with perhaps up to ten or twelve feet for
the fence around the Joint Security Complex. It is not reasonable to think that the
proposed structure is classified as a fence. This structure is not usual or customary as
Page 2, Letter to Joseph B. F. Phillips
Official Determination: Poles and Barrier Netting
December 10, 1997
accessory to any use or property other than a specific recreational facility or park where
one would find items such as a baseball backstop, batting cage or some similar structure.
The information I have found on those items have indicated that twelve feet is an industry
standard for even these speciality structures. According to Yokley's Zoning Law and
Practice, case law has determined that back stop and side stops for tennis courts have
been held not to be fences. I believe that your poles and barrier netting would also be in
this category, and be determined not to be a fence.
You have stated that since the driving range is allowed by right in the floodway and this
structure is an integral part of the use, it must be allowed. To the contrary, I have called
and visited a number of driving ranges that have no such structure and have been
operating successfully. Therefore, our ordinance is appropriately written allowing the
use, "driving range," but not allowing such a structure of poles and netting in the
floodway. Section 30.3.5.1.1 (2) that allows the driving range under the broader category
of "recreational uses" also specifically excludes structures of any kind in the floodway.
Another example of this exclusion would be that "picnic grounds" are allowed, but a
permanently affixed picnic table or shelter would not be allowed. Similarly, "athletic
fields" are allowed, but a backstop or bleachers would not. These exclusions do not
prohibit the use, only limit them to make the use appropriate in the Flood Hazard Overlay
District.
Finally, utility poles are allowed only for distribution of local service and only if they are
owned and operated by a public utility. Public utilities are allowed in every district
because they serve the public at large and perform a public service that is essential to the
health of the community. Public utilities are regulated by the State Corporation
Commission.
If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have the right to appeal it within thirty (30)
days of the date notice of this determination is given, in accordance with Section 15.1-
496.1 of the Code of Virginia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall
be final and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning
Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the
grounds for the appeal. An appeal application must be completed and filed along with the
fee of $95. The date notice of this determination was given is the same as the date of this
letter.
Janice D. Sprinkle
Deputy Zoning Administrator
cc: Larry Davis
Susan Thomas
Paul Muhlberger