HomeMy WebLinkAboutLOD199000014 Letter of Determination 1990-11-26 (2)pf AlJ�•
1
i' �,I�I "11111
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
November 26, 1990
James Gercke
P. O. Box 7213
Charlottesville, VA 22906
oFc 7 MD
PLANNING DIVISION
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF PARCELS OF RECORD AND DEVELOPMENT
RIGHTS (Section 10.3.1), Tax Map 17, Parcel 18
Dear Mr. Gercke:
This shall confirm in writing for the record my official
determination of the number of parcels in existence, and the
related development rights for the above -noted property. This is
the same property for which you have submitted a subdivision plat
entitled Fieldstone, Preliminary Subdivision dated November 5,
1990, which is currently under review by the County. This
determination is pursuant to Section 10.3.1 of the Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance and includes consideration based on the
definition of "lot of record" found in Section 3.0.
It is my opinion that the above -noted property consisting of one
(1) tax map parcel number, consists in fact of five (5) lots of
record. Each of these five lots is entitled to development rights
based on acreage and building sites.
A breakdown of each lot of record and theoretical development
rights is as follows:
SOURCE ACREAGE DEV. RIGHTS
1) Chain 10 DB 159/185 49.3 5
2) Chain 09 DB 163/493 51.5 5
3) Chain 08 DB 169/245 8.0 4
4) Chain 07 DB 213/466 20.0 5
5) Chain 06 DB 249/573 198.0 5
TOTAL; ? L �ctPS 24
��,✓f €�% {C�cr�a�;C �:r* t.�• ,+r'�S+�t_ +p q _ iy aP3,6�
November 26► 1990
Mr. James Gercke
Page 2
development rights. Use of
theoretical theezoning Ordinance and
to comply with subdivision
These calculations are or
these rights would have It appears that the proposed
Ordinance. the requirement based on the
Subdivision analysis and a development right
complies with my each new lot contain
Hopewell case, that arent lot.
�� from an old or p which
"kernel ending zoning text amendment I
there is a P this type.
As you are aware► for future determinations the Board of
may change the criteria currently scheduled for
that it is revisions may be reviewed by.
do not believe that suggested Ordinance is amended in
order If the
Supervisors e Commission• for these determinations,
staff and the Planning
would change the criteria
ending approvals either by a way that the status of pending
on the Zoning
staff will determine their
address them in case with the County
having the Board them case -by -
Amendment or addressing
writing with
Attorney- appeal in with
this determination m) dy, in accordance
Anyone aggrieved by within thirty (30) lease feel free to
justification thereof, questions,
P
Section 34.2. If you have any q
call.
Sincerely,
C� P
Amelia M- Patterson
Zoning Administrator
AMP/ sp
cc: George McCallum
Rich Tarbell
TM17/P18