HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-12-11
-_.._~
FIN A L
9:00 A.M., December 11, 1991
Room 7, County Office Building
YOUTH-IN-GOVERNMENT DAY
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) *Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) Approval of Minutes: April 10, 1991.
7) Highway Matters:
a) Work Session: Six-Year Road Plan.
b) City/County/University Resolution re: Road Improvements.
c) Report from County Attorney on private condemnation laws in Virginia.
d) Memorandum dated December 2, 1991, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County
Executive, concerning the public hearing which had been scheduled on the
vacation of Peyton Drive as a public right-of-way
d) Other Highway Matters.
8) Appeal: Sara Watson Preliminary Plat (Deferred from November 13, 1991). (Appli-
cant requests deferral to February, 1992.)
9) STA-91-1. Public Hearing: Amendment to Chapter 18 of Albemarle Code to incor-
porate VDoT mountainous terrain and rolling terrain standards. (Deferred from
October 16 and November 13, 1991.)
10) Comprehensive Plan, Yearly Status Report.
11) Covenant Church of God, request to be included in the service area boundaries of
the Albemarle County Service Authority on Tax Map 46, Parcel 22D.
12) Stormwater Management Report.
13) Presentation: Fiscal Year 1991 Audit Report.
14) Request: Traffic Unit - Motorcycles.
15) Request for Exception to Payment Procedure for Terminating Employees.
16) 11:30 A.M. - Public Hearing: An Ordinance to amend the "Equalization of Pay
Ordinance" to add the BOCA Code Board of Appeals and the Fire Prevention
Code Board of Appeals effective July 1, 1992.
17) Appropriation requests:
a) From the Education Department to appropriate Additional State Revenues.
b) Fire/Rescue Coordinator.
18) Executive Session: Personnel.
19) 1:30 P.M. ZTA-91-08. Public Hearing on An ordinance to amend and reenact Section
35.0 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance entitled "Fees."
20) STA-91-02. Public Hearing on An ordinance to amend and reenact Article 18-43,
Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land, of the Code of Albemarle, entitled "Fees."
21) Public Hearing: An ordinance to amend and reenact various sections and chapters of
the Code of Albemarle to increase fees as follows: Sec 2.1-2 relating to the
application fee for an agricultural/forestal district; Sec 7-4, erosion and
sedimentation control, to increase the fee for plan review; to amend Sec 9 of
the Water Resources Protection Ordinance in subsection (c) and subsection (d)
to require payment of a fee.
22) Public Hearing: The Board will also consider adopting a resolution setting a fee for
submission of a Comprehensive Plan amendment, a fee for requests to be included
in service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority; and,
requests for abandonment of roads which mayor may not have been a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways.
23) SP-90-31. Little Keswick School. Public Hearing on a request for extension of
special use permit issued June 6, 1990, to allow expansion of the School by
utilizing the existing community building for East Rivanna Fire Company. Pt'o-
perty consists of 1. 0 ac zoned RA located on E side of Rt 731 approx 200 ft S
of R t 22. TM80, P110A. Rivanna Dist. (Property is not in a growth area.)
24) Discussion: Legislation re: Landfill Closures.
25) Road Naming Status Report
26) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
27) Adjourn to December 18, 1991, at 4:00 P.M. jn Room 5/6.
i
. I
I
CON S E N T
AGE N D A
FOR APPROVAL:
5.1 Memorandum dated November 22, 1991, from Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance,
addressed to Rick Huff, Deputy County Executive, forwarding a request from the
Albemarle Housing Improvement Program (AHIP) that they be allowed to retain the
surplus from Fiscal Year 1989-90 for use in other projects.
5.2 Memorandum dated December 6, 1991, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County
Executive, entitled "Approval of Job Description for Community Resource
Coordinator. "
5.3 Memorandum dated December 6, 1991, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County
Executive, entitled "Approval of local Virginia Cooperative Extension Services
Director. "
FOR INFORMATION:
5.4 Letter dated November 26, 1991, from John G. Milliken addressed to F. R. Bowie,
Chairman, concerning the County's letter re: Secretary Milliken's funding proposals.
5.5 Letter dated November 26, 1991, from David R. Gehr, Assistant Commissioner
Operations, Virginia Department of Transportation, re: Changes in the Primary
System on Route 240.
5.6 Letter dated December 3, 1991, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, Virginia
Department of Transportation, enclosing copy of "Current Projects-Construction
Schedule. "
5.7 Memorandum dated November 20, 1991, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Execu-
tive, re: Public Information Dissemination.
6,,:,8 _ _ Memorand lun -dated - Beeemeer -2, - ~99 ~, -from - Ro be:rot:- W ':' - !fl:leker, -d:ro ':', -€Ol:l n ty - Exeeli--
ti-ve,-eonee:ron:mg -t:he -l'l:lbHe -hea:ro:mg -whieh -had -eeen -8ehedl:lled -on -t:he -vaeat:ion -of
Peyt-on-Bri've-as-a-l'l:lblie-rir;ht-of-way. (Moved to Item 7 - Highway Matters)
5.9 Memorandum dated December 2, 1991, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Execu-
tive, re: Group Health Insurance Coverage.
5.10 Notice dated November 19, 1991, from the State Corporation Commission re: Applica-
tion of Wiltel of Virginia, Inc. for a certificate of public convenience and necessity
to provide inter-LATA interexchange telephone service in Vi.rginia and to have rates
determined competitively.
5.11 Copy of "Strategic Plan for the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services" from Dr. Clinton V. Turner, Commissioner.
5.12 Copy of "Greenwood Chemical Site" report for December, 1991 from the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
5.13 Copy of Minutes of the Planning Commission for November 26, 1991.
5.14 scottsville Annexation Committee Update.
5.15 Proposed Legislation for Land Use Taxation, Local Agricultural/Forestal Districts and
Decal Fines.
5.16 Memorandum dated December 5, 1991, from Clifford W. Haury, Chairman, Albemarle
County School Board, entitled "School Board Action on the Proposed New Middle
School. "
,
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
MEMORANDUM
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Edward H Bain, Jr
Samuel Miller
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F Perkms
White Hall
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
TO:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
FROM:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
and Community Development
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk. CMC~
December 12, 1991
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board Actions of December 11, 1991
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting held on December 11, 1991, the follow-
ing actions were taken:
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
There were none.
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Memorandum dated November 22, 1991, from Melvin
Breeden, Director of Finance, addressed to Rick Huff, Deputy County Executive,
forwarding a request from the Albemarle Housing Improvement Program (AHIP) that
they be allowed to retain the surplus from Fiscal Year 1989-90 for use in other
projects. AUTHORIZED AHIP to carryover FY 1989-90 surplus County funds in the
amount of $13,840.06.
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Memorandum dated December 6, 1991, from Robert W.
Tucker, Jr., County Executive, entitled "Approval of Job Description for Commu-
nity Resource Coordinator." APPROVED the attached job description for a Commu-
nity Resource Coordinator and approved the conversion of a police officer posi-
tion to a civilian position.
The Board asked staff to communicate with Virginia Power, Centel and C&P
Telephone to see if they are willing to allow the County to include information
fliers in their respective bills to County customers.
Agenda Item No. 5.3. Memorandum dated December 6, 1991, from Robert W.
Tucker, Jr., County Executive, entitled "Approval of local Virginia Cooperative
Extension Services Director." CONFIRMED the appointment of Charles Goodman as
the director of the local Virginia Cooperative Extension Service.
Date:
Page 2
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 12, 1991
Memo To:
Agenda Item No. 5.16. Memorandum dated December 5, 1991, from Clifford W.
Haury, Chairman, Albemarle County School Board, entitled "School Board Action on
the Proposed New Middle School." To be discussed at the joint meeting with the
School Board in January, 1992.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matters: Work Session: Six-Year Road Plan.
The Board made the following comments:
1. Requested that the priority list include a column to show where funds are
transferred within the plan when funding totals for projects change;
2. Requested a clarification on the status of the Meadow Creek Parkway
project;
3. Board members to submit questions on various projects to the staff;
4. Requested the staff to schedule a meeting with the two newly elected
supervisors to provide them with an overview of the projects in the plan
prior to the January work session;
5. Set the work session on the Six Year Plan for the January, 1992, day meet-
ing;
6. Requested a follow-up from Mr. Roosevelt on the status of the Millington
Bridge project.
Agenda Item No. 7b. City/County/University Resolution re:
ments. AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the attached resolution.
resolution has been forwarded to the City for signature.
Road Improve-
The original
Agenda Item No. 7c. Report from County Attorney on private condemnation
laws in Virginia. Staff to prepare a letter to be given to the legislators on
December 18 requesting their support of the attached language recommended by the
County Attorney.
Agenda Item No. 7d. Memorandum dated December 2, 1991, from Robert W.
Tucker, Jr., County Executive, concerning the public hearing which had been
scheduled on the vacation of Peyton Drive as a public right-of-way. No action.
Agenda Item No. 7e. Other Highway Matters.
Staff to prepare a letter to Secretary Milliken, for the Chairman's signa-
ture, requesting that Alternative 10 not impact the Agnor-Hurt Elementary School
property and the cemetery located in the area.
Agenda Item No.8. Appeal: Sara Watson Preliminary Plat (Deferred from
November 13, 1991). At the request of the applicant, DEFERRED to February,
1992.
Date:
Page 3
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 12, 1991
Memo To:
Agenda Item No.9. STA-91-1. Public Hearing: Amendment to Chapter 18 of
Albemarle Code to incorporate VDoT mountainous terrain and rolling terrain
standards. ADOPTED an ordinance to amend Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County
Code to incorporate VDoT mountainous terrain and rolling terrain standards as
presented. All paperwork will follow under separate cover.
Staff to consider language for inclusion in homeowner's association agree-
ments that the homeowner's association shall collect an amount each year suffi-
cient to maintain the private road in the subdivision.
Requested staff to notify the Board if the ratio of requests for private
roads vs. public roads dramatically alters.
Staff to draft language for an ordinance amendment to allow the County to
hold a performance bond for one year after acceptance of a private road or after
construction of a subdivision using a private road.
Agenda Item No. 10. Comprehensive Plan, Yearly Status Report.
Requested the staff to move forward with some planning on an Agricultural/
Forestal Resources Advisory Committee.
Staff to bring back a recommendation in January, 1992, on how to implement
and accomplish recommendations #1 and #2 (copy attached).
Agenda Item No. 11. Covenant Church of God, request to be included in the
service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority on Tax Map 46,
Parcel 22D. Set a public hearing for January 22, 1992, on a request to include
Tax Map 46, Parcel 22D, adjacent to the Hollymead Growth Area, in the service
area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for water and sewer.
Agenda Item No. 12. Stormwater Management Report. No action.
Agenda Item No. 13. Presentation: Fiscal Year 1991 Audit Report. No
action.
Agenda Item No. 14. Request: Traffic Unit - Motorcycles. APPROVED the
addition of motorcycles to the County's traffic enforcement program as outlined
in the attached memorandum from Chief Miller.
Agenda Item No. 15. Request for Exception to Payment Procedure for Termi-
nating Employees. APPROVED a recommendation to allow employees who are being
terminated through no fault of their own to reexamine their original payment
option for unused sick leave and to choose the option which best suits their
needs at the time their employment is terminated.
Date:
Page 4
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 12, 1991
Memo To:
Agenda Item No. 16. Public Hearing: An Ordinance to amend the "Equaliza-
tion of Pay Ordinance" to add the BOCA Code Board of Appeals and the Fire Pre-
vention Code Board of Appeals effective July 1, 1992. ADOPTED the attached
ordinance to amend and reenact Article II, Chapter 15, of the Code of Albemarle,
known as "Equalization of Pay of Certain Boards and Commissions," to add the
BOCA Code Board of Appeals and the Fire Prevention Code Board of Appeals, effec-
tive July 1, 1992.
Agenda Item No. 17a. Appropriation request: From the Education Department
to appropriate Additional State Revenues. APPROVED the attached appropriation
request for an additional $108,524 in State funding received, to be held in
reserve. The original appropriation form has been forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 17b. Appropriation:
appropriation for $1300 to purchase office
Rescue Coordinator's office. The original
to Melvin Breeden.
Fire/Rescue Coordinator. APPROVED an
furniture and equipment in the Fire/
appropriation form has been forwarded
Agenda Item No. 19. ZTA-91-08. Public Hearing on An ordinance to amend
and reenact Section 35.0 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance entitled
"Fees." ADOPTED an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 35.0 of the Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance entitled "Fees," to be effective April 1, 1992. All
paperwork will follow under separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 20. STA-91-02. Public Hearing on An ordinance to amend
and reenact Article 18-43, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land, of the Code of
Albemarle, entitled "Fees." ADOPTED an ordinance to amend and reenact Section
18-43, Fees, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land, of the Code of Albemarle, to be
effective April 1, 1992. All paperwork will follow under separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 21. Public Hearing: An ordinance to amend and reenact
various sections and chapters of the Code of Albemarle to increase fees as
follows: Sec 2.1-2 relating to the application fee for an agricultural/forestal
district; Sec 7-4, erosion and sedimentation control, to increase the fee for
plan review; to amend Sec 9 of the Water Resources Protection Ordinance in
subsection (c) and subsection (d) to require payment of a fee. ADOPTED an
ordinance to amend and reenact the following sections of the Code of Albemarle
to increase fees:
Section 2.1-2 of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, in
subsection (c);
Section 7-4 of Chapter 7, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, in subsection
(d);
Date:
Page 5
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 12, 1991
Memo To:
Section 9 of the Water Resources Protection Ordinance in subsection (c)
Minor Water Quality Impact Assessment and (d) Major Water Quality Impact Assess-
ment;
All amendments to be effective April 1, 1992. All paperwork will follow
under separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 22. Public Hearing: The Board will also consider adopting
a resolution setting a fee for submission of a Comprehensive Plan amendment, a
fee for requests to be included in service area boundaries of the Albemarle
County Service Authority; and, requests for abandonment of roads which mayor
may not have been a part of the State Secondary System of Highways.
ADOPTED a resolution to establish a fee for Comprehensive Plan amendments
by amending and reenacting Paragraph No. 2 of the POLICY FOR SUBMITTAL OF
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA.
ADOPTED a resolution to establish fees for requests to amend service area
boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority to include property for
water and/or sewer service.
ADOPTED a resolution to establish a fee for requests to abandon roads which
mayor may not have been a part of the State Secondary System of Highways.
ADOPTED an ordinance to amend and reenact the Zoning Ordinance in Section
4.15.4.1, Sign Permits.
All actions to be effective April 1, 1992. All paperwork will follow under
separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 23. SP-90-31. Little Keswick School. Public Hearing on a
request for extension of special use permit issued June 6, 1990, to allow expan-
sion of the School by utilizing the existing community building for East Rivanna
Fire Company. Property consists of 1.0 ac zoned RA located on E side of Rt 731
approx 200 ft S of Rt 22. TM80,PI10A. Rivanna Dist. APPROVED an extension of
SP-90-31 for 18 months to June 6, 1993.
Agenda Item No. 24. Discussion: Legislation re: Landfill Closures.
Adopted the attached resolution to be given to the legislators on December 18
along with a cover letter briefly outlining the proposal and requesting their
support.
Agenda Item No. 25. Road Naming Status Report. Took the following
actions:
Renamed Route 53 from its intersection with Route 20 proceeding easterly
until it hits Route 795 and then continuing along Route 795 until it intersects
Route 620 as Jefferson-Monroe Parkway.
Date:
Page 6
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 12, 1991
Memo To:
Named Route 627 from its intersection with Route 795 over to Route 20 South
at Carters Bridge as Carters Mountain Road.
Renamed Route 53 from its intersection with Route 795 easterly to the
Fluvanna County line as Buck Island Road.
Renamed Route 729 from its intersection with Route 53 in a southeasterly
direction to its intersection with Route 618 as Milton Road.
Agenda Item No. 26. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
AUTHORIZED staff to purchase operating software from IBM for the mainframe.
Requested an update on information services equipment and software needs prior
to the budget cycle.
Voted to discuss reconsidering the naming of Jefferson-Monroe Parkway on
December 18.
Requested language be drafted for possible legislation to not allow land
use value taxation in the growth areas and to look at a longer roll back period
for properties in the growth area.
Staff to bring back a cost estimate on December 18 to extend the Crozet
Recycling project for another month.
LEN:ec
Attachments
cc: Robert B. Brandenburger
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Amelia Patterson
George R. St. John
File
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
POSITION DESCRIPTION
JOB TITLE
LOCATION
Community Resource Co-Ordinator
Police Department
IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR
Chief of Police
GENERAL DEFINITION OF WORK
Responsible for the management and supervision of all department
crime prevention programs.
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES
o
Establishes, maintains and co-ordinates all departmental
neighborhood watch programs and public relation activities.
o
Supervises, recruits and trains all neighborhood watch co-
ordinators and block captains.
o
Supervises and recruits citizen volunteers to assist in the
neighborhood watch program as well as with other department
units.
o
Participates in developing the annual crime prevention budget
which is then incorporated into the overall department budget.
o
Writes, edits and publishes the department newsletter for
distribution throughout the community.
o
Supervises, plans and co-ordinates all department crime
prevention programs, i.e. (business crime seminars~ senior
center programs, traffic safety awareness, etc.)
o
Establishes and maintains good records which reflect
quantifiable data describing program activities.
o
Identifies and solicits state and federal funds.
o
Represents Chief of Police and department with local
committees/organizations, i.e. Albemarle County Crime
Prevention Council, Alcohol/Drug Substance Abuse Council~ VA
Crime Prevention Association; Mobile Watch Program; etc.
o
Maintains liaison with local media representatives
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the City of Charlottesville, the County of Albemarle
and the University of Virginia have reviewed the improvements
proposed by the Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB)
for the 29 North Corridor; and
WHEREAS, the City, County and University believe a unified and
cooperative implementation agreement with the CTB and the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDoT) is necessary to provide for
these improvements in an expeditious and efficient manner;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City, County and
University jointly support and request that the CTB and VDoT
implement improvements to the 29 North Corridor in the following
sequence:
o Widen Route 29 North as provided for in 1985 Charlottes-
ville Area Transportation Study;
o Design the North Grounds connector road facility;
o Address each element of CTB Phase I recommendation of
November 15, 1990;
o Construct the Meadowcreek Parkway from the Route 250
By-Pass to U. S. 29 North as soon as funding is avail-
able;
o Construct grade-separated interchanges on U. S. 29 North
at Hydraulic Road (Rt. 743), Greenbrier Drive (Rt. 866)
and Rio Road (Rt. 631) with early acquisition of right-
of -way for these interchanges based upon hardship ( same
program being used for early acquisition for Alternative
10 - Western alignment);
o Construct an alternate controlled vehicle access for
traff ic bound for Uni versi ty areas only, including the
north grounds from Route 29/250 By-Pass;
o Complete remainder of CTB Phase II recommendation of
November 15, 1990; and
o Construct Alternative 10 after completion of the above
and when traffic on Route 29 is unacceptable and economic
conditions permit, concurrent with remainder of 1985
Charlottesville Area Transportation Study.
Sec. 33.1-18.1. Acquisition of Right of Way within three
years of location.-- Within three years of the location of any
route by the Board pursuant to Sec. 33.1-18, the Board shall,
pursuant to Sees. 33.1-138 and 33.1-139, proceed to acquire all
properties to constitute right of way for the route or routes so
located.
With respect to routes located prior to the effective date
of this section, the Board shall acquire the properties to
constitute such right of way within three years of the effective
date of this section.
Compensation shall be the fair market value of such
properties on the date of location by the Board or on the date of
acquisition, whichever is greater.
Upon failure of the Board to comply with this section,
owners of such properties shall be entitled to bring an action in
the circuit court wherein their respective properties lie, to
injoin the Board immediately to institute proceedings for the
acquisition of such properties in accord with this section.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
13. Annual "status of the Plan" Report - This is the
first report since adoption of the Comprehensive
Plan. Subsequent reports will be issued annually.
Recommendations:
The following are recommendations for further action to be
undertaken:
1. The County should conduct a fiscal impact analysis to
determine how development and population trends and
projections will affect revenues and expenditures of
the County. This analysis should be conducted at two
levels: (1) based on existing growth areas as defined
in the Comprehensive Plan; and, (2) based on expansion
of growth areas to accommodate additional land use
needs as noted in this report.
This analysis has been recommended for several years.
The analysis and ultimate development of a fiscal
impact model is an important step in the process for
evaluating how the County will support future growth in
an effective manner. A fiscal impact analysis should
be considered a high priority and begin in FY91-92.
2. The County should also establish a systematic annual
review of the County's fiscal condition as recommended
in the Comprehensive Plan (p. 222). This ongoing
assessment would provide a method to monitor various
financial indicators and identify any warning trends
which could adversely affect the County's financial
condition. This system should be established in
FY91-92.
3. Upon completion of a fiscal impact analysis, the staff
should evaluate growth area expansion to accommodate
land use needs. Various locations for growth area
expansion should be considered, but particular emphasis
should be given to re-evaluating the Hollyrnead
Community/Piney Mountain Village area for expansion
potential.
Based on a Board of Supervisors directive at the time
of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the Hollyrnead
Community was evaluated in 1989 for possible expansion.
It was determined that expansion of Hollyrnead was not
appropriate at that time due to a number of outstanding
issues or additional planning work that needed to be
resolved or completed. These issues/activities
include:
1. Development of a Community Facilities Plan;
2. Development of a County Open Space Plan;
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
!'\~ ~". ~.. ,\ll: 1.;;: '".. "..... '".,.~ill~ . '
~L_Jl1Lj41_ .:.:
'\ {; 'c'
, DEC..3. 19.~1 <\I:.'.~'
~1 ~~
U1.'
. -':')~";' . ..""
,dI P.1:"'" ~ '.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
RICHARD E. HUFF, JR., DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE
CHIEF JOHN F. MILLER~' .~
DECEMBER 3, 1991
TRAFFIC UNIT - MOTORCYCLES
During the first ten (10) months of calendar year 1991, the
County Police Department investigated 1396 accidents, a 12.5%
increase over the same period of 1990. The Department issued
1417 traffic citations during the first ten months of 1991, a
46.02% decrease over the same period of 1990. Traffic related
calls accounted for 20.3% of the total calls for services during
the first ten months of 1991.
This data demonstrates the large demands placed on the
patrol division for traffic related calls. While traffic
enforcement and the maintenance of traffic flow will always be a
primary function of the beat officer, a specialized traffic unit
will allow the Police Department to accomplish this part of our
mission more effectively.
While staffing levels do not allow for a full time traffic
unit at this time, a variety of benefits will be recognized by
adding motorcycles to the police department's fleet. Some of the
major benefits include:
1. More Effective Police Response - In areas of high
traffic, or in an area where a traffic accident has
occurred, maneuvering of police cruisers is very
difficult. The use of motorcycles will allow officers
to navigate in these areas much more easily, improving
our response time to traffic incidents, as well as
other emergency calls. Police motorcycles can also
access areas that are not accessible by cruiser; ie.
park trails, school grounds, etc.
2. Enhance Traffic Enforcement Efforts - Police motorcyles
make traffic law enforcement much easier for the
officer. In areas of high traffic volumes, a police
o R DIN A N C E
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
ARTICLE II, CHAPTER 15, OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE, KNOWN AS
"EQUALIZATION OF PAY OF CERTAIN BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
BE IT ORDAINED by the
County, Virginia, that Article
Code of Albemarle, is hereby
follows:
Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
II, Chapter 15, Section 15-2, of the
amended and reenacted to read as
Sec. 15-2. Enumerated.
Each member of the following boards and commissions duly
appointed by the board of supervisors shall be paid thirty-five
dollars ($35.00) for each and every regularly scheduled meeting of
the board or commission actually attended, as set forth in the
rules and regulations of that board or commission: board of zoning
appeals; BOCA code board of appeals; equalization board; fire
prevention code board of appeals; and, land use tax advisory board.
AND FURTHER ORDAINED that this ordinance shall be effective on
and after July 1, 1992.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a
true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board
of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting
held on December 11, 1991.
~.~~
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
f
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR 91/92 NUMBER 910028
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES
NO X
FUND SCHOOL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITIONAL FUNDING OF BASIC SCHOOL AID
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1241061101580000 SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE $108,524.00
TOTAL
$108,524.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2200024000240202 BASIC SCHOOL AID $108,524.00
TOTAL
$108,524.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~~
/1'- .2 '7 - ? J
/~-?/
,
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
. .
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910029
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR PURCHASE OF OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT
IN THE FIRE/RESCUE COORDINATOR OFFICE.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100032031800200 FURNITURE & FIXTURES $1,300.00
TOTAL
$1,300.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100051000510100 GENERAL FUND BALANCE $1,300.00
TOTAL
$1,300.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~.f~
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
/.,,;;.'- ~..~/
//-/~-~/
. .
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Waste
Management Regulations UR 672-20-10 requires all sanitary landfill
cells opened under existing permits after December 18, 1988 to be
closed under the new regulations; and
WHEREAS, while the Department of Waste Management's concern
relates to lechate generated in these cells entering and contami-
nating the environment, and groundwater in particular; and
WHEREAS, requiring the placement of a cap atop these closed
cells is a costly procedure with no proven benefit; and
WHEREAS, owners of landfills are still responsible for ground-
water quality irrespective of a requirement to cap cells under the
new regulations; and
WHEREAS, the requirement to monitor groundwater quality and
take mitigating action when deemed necessary is an appropriate
action; and
WHEREAS, these actions should meet the intent of groundwater
quality and environmental protection without incurring a costly
closure procedure; and
WHEREAS, the current waste management regulations do not allow
for alternative monitoring and subsequent mitigation in lieu of a
costly closure process;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Albemarle strongly requests its legislators to urge
the General Assembly to create a separate legislative commission to
review the efficacy of the State's current solid waste regulations.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular
meeting held on December 11, 199~.
Clerk, Board ~unty Supervisors
'\ ,'.,," J~:_r,-c(ijCOUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
9.// "IiJ"; pr"11W.
~' NOV 22 199~U
'1 \
U'
.~~ :~ ~
~ 'r.-"",.... :~:~ :": ~b~~
t. b,"" .ifr,. n"JIl'; .
EXECUTIve ornCE
" .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Huff, Deputy County Executive
FROM:
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
November 22, 1991
DATE:
RE:
AHIP
Attached is the explanation received from AHIP on their
request to retain the $13,840.06 surplus from FY 89/90.
The explanation is rather lengthy but comes down to they were
able to use grant funds in place of local funds and would now like
to retain the local funds for additional projects.
Ms. Tapscott advises that this money can be refunded if
necessary. Based on the services provided by this organization I
would recommend approval of their request.
MAB/bs
Attachment
I .
AHIP
Albemarle Housing Improvement Program
409C East High Street. Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 . (804) 293-5708
October 16, 1991
Mr. Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
Albemarle County Office Building
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Dear Mr. Breeden,
In my let~er to you dated August 14, 1991, I reques~ed the
County allow AHIP to carryover FY 89-90 surplus County funds or
$13,840.06. Several weeks lacer you phoned to request mere
information regarding my request. I'm sorry it's taken me so
long to respond to your request, but the following is a history
of the $13,840.06 cash surplus.
'...,
During the period from March 1987 through September 1987,
AHIP applied for two separate grants to fund housing
rehabilitation activities in the County. The first was the
Farmers Home Administration's Rural Housing Preserv2.tior. Grant
(FmHA HPG), and the second the Department of Health and Human
Services, Office of Community Services, Discretionary Grant (HBS
OCS). In addition, the County applied for a Community Developmen~
Block Grant (:DBG) to fund housing rehabilitation activities.
Luckily (but quite unexpectedly) AHIP was funded' DV both
programs, as well as the County being funded by CDBG.
AHIP pledged County operating support to each or the
yrograms as "leverage". County operating support was also used
as match for the CDEG application. Howe':e:::-, be:.:ause all three
g ran t pro p 0 s a I s we ref u n d ed, i t was p 0 s sib 1 e t 0 sub s tit ;1 t e
dollars from the FmHA HPG and the HHS OCS Discretionary Grant fo~'
the County's operating support to meet the leveraging
requirements for the CDBG.
Early in 1990, just as the County's 1987 CDBG was expiring,
the Courrty chose to apply once again to that program for Housing
Rehabilitation funding. Unfortunately, the proposal was no~
funded. At that point, it became obvious to me that AHIP's
funding for rehabilitation carpentry labor for the fiscal year to
begin July 1. 1990 was going to be a scarce commodity.
I closely examined the CDBG budget and determined that all
match requirements set forth in the application had not only been
met, but far exceeded. In addition, I determined sufficient
funding was still available from 1987 CDBG monies to fund AHIP's
direct carpentry labor for the balance of the fiscal year. It
An Affiliate of The Charlottesville Housing Foundation
Page 2
was at that point, I decided to conserve
funding for carpentry labor provided by
instead apply the remaining CDBG funding.
the balance of AHIP' s
Albemarle County and
My rationale was that AHIP was still performing work for
CDBG project families, thus the use of that funding was
appropriate. Also, looking into the future, it was my hope that
any County funds saved as a result of my decision, could be
carried forward for use during FY 90-91 to continue to fund
carpentry staff already on board at AHIP.
I discussed this proposal with Ray Jones on several
occasions. Mr. Jones made clear that he did not have the
authority to grant AHIP permission to carry the surplus over.
However, he did view my decision as reasonable, and felt the
Board of Supervisors would approve the carryover. Also, I felt
the risk I was taking was minimal in that AHIP's audit which
identifies surpluses/deficiencies is completed shortly after the
conclusion of the fiscal year. My feeling was that I could
obtain a decision from the Board before a considerable period of
time had elapsed.
As fate would have it, one set of unfortunate circumstances
followed another at AHIP during that time period. Computer
difficulties early in the fiscal year made it impossible for the
audit to take place. As soon as the computer was "straightened
out", AHIP's auditor became ill and was unable to complete the
audit in a timely fashion. AHIP did not receive the completed
audit until March of 1991. It was at that time that I began the
process of formally requesting permission from the County to
carry the surplus over.
Again I apologize for making this request nearly a year
after the fact. I hope however the Board of Supervisors will
favorably consider this request. Fiscal year 90-91 was indeed
unusual for AHIP in that funding was available for material and
subcontract purchases, but very little was available to fund the
labor necessary to perform the rehabilitation. The current year
presents a much brighter picture in that the County was again
funded for housing rehabilitation through the CDBG program and
AHIP has secured on its own behalf another FmHA HPG.
Thank you again for your patience in dealing with this
matter. Please call if I can be of more assistance.
Sincerely,
~(L~
Theresa L. Tapscott
Executive Director-AHIP
-"L~~teoe:"9 j
9;. IZ.!} (S' ).)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors ~
r:--
County Executive (
I
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
December 6, 1991
RE: Job Description - Community Resource Coordinator
Attached is a copy of a new job description with a memo from Chief
John Miller regarding the transfer of a sworn officer position to
a civilian position. This civilian position will be responsible
for all community based programs, activities, and coordination of
over 85 Neighborhood Watch and business associations. Chief Miller
feels this position will greatly aid in the implementation of our
community policing initiative and will also be responsible for a
regular newsletter disseminating department and county information.
Additionally, the creation of this position will enable the
department to shift an existing police sergeant into Youth
Investigations to provide additional manpower to the growing
case load in this area. He will also be responsible for supervising
our D.A.R.E. and P.U.L.S.A.R. programs as well as a School Resource
Officer Program, all of which are targeted to the needs of our
young people.
Staff recommends approval of the attached job description and
associated civilianizing of one sworn police officer position.
RWT,Jr/REH,II/dbm
91. 230
Attachment
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Police Department
County Office Building
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5807
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
-'.
FROM: Chief John Miller J~,A
DATE: December 6, 1991
RE: Shift of a Police Officer Position to a Civilian Position
I am requesting the authorization to convert a police officer position to
a newly created civilian position of Connnunity Resource Coordinator (see
attached). This new position is vital to our connnunity policing initiatives that
will begin in January, 1992. The conversion will allow the department to
continue to civilianize those administrative positions where sworn personnel are
not needed. It will also allow re-aligning the responsibilities of an existing
sergeant.
....
This request, if approved, will make it possible to transfer a police
sergeant from an administrator position to a supervisory position in our youth
services unit. Because of our steadily growing youth investigative workload and
in order to facilitate the managing of the D.A.R.E. program; the P.U.L.S.A.R.
program and the School Resource Officer program, it is necessary to combine them
into one unit with one supervisor responsible for the co-ordination and direction
of these related activities. The police sergeant we will be assigning is trained
and experienced in our youth programs.
The Civilian Connnunity Resource Coordinator will be directly involved with
the over 85 neighborhood watches and business associations in identifying
specific problems and concerns and in coordinating department programs and
activities to address them. This position will also be responsible for many
other connnunity based programs and activities, as well as creating and publishing
a department newsletter for the connnunity.
The conversion of a police officer position to a civilian position is
important to meeting our department needs and will not require any additional
appropriation of funds.
JFM/bat
91-6
Attachment
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
POSITION DESCRIPTION
JOB TITLE
LOCATION
Community Resource Co-Ordinator
Police Department
IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR
Chief of Police
GENERAL DEFINITION OF WORK
Responsible for the management and supervision of all department
crime prevention programs.
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES
o
Establishes, maintains and co-ordinates all departmental
neighborhood watch programs and public relation activities.
o
Supervises, recruits and trains all neighborhood watch co-
ordinators and block captains.
o
Supervises and recruits citizen volunteers to assist in the
neighborhood watch program as well as with other department
units.
o
Participates in developing the annual crime prevention budget
which is then incorporated into the overall department budget.
o
Writes, edits and publishes the department newsletter for
distribution throughout the community.
o
Supervises, plans and co-ordinates all department crime
prevention programs, i.e. (business crime seminars: senior
center programs, traffic safety awareness, etc.)
o
Establishes and maintains good records which reflect
quantifiable data describing program activities.
o
Identifies and solicits state and federal funds.
o
Represents Chief of Police and department with local
committees/organizations, i.e. Albemarle County Crime
Prevention Council, Alcohol/Drug Substance Abuse Council: VA
Crime Prevention Association: Mobile Watch Program: etc.
o
Maintains liaison with local media representatives
o Edits and prepares news releases on crime prevention programs
and other department activities.
o Acts as public relations advisor to the Chief of Police in the
formulation of public information policies and implementation of
department programs.
o Makes crime prevention presentations to civic associations,
businesses and other agencies.
o Establishes and co-ordinates meetings between community groups
and departmental command staff.
o Other duties assigned.
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES
o Very strong oral and written communication skills.
o Exceptional ability to work with people.
o Ability to work and perform under pressure.
o Ability to make effective presentations to civic/business
organizations.
o Ability to establish and maintain effective working
relationships with community organizations.
o Ability to develop and present community based crime prevention
programs.
o Possessing a working knowledge of the criminal justice system is
required.
EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE
Bachelor's degree in Public Administration, Public Relations or
Criminal Justice. Minimum of two (2) years experience in designing
and implementing community based educational programs; editing and
writing newsletters.
EVALUATION
Performance will be evaluated on the ability and effectiveness in
carrying out the above responsibilities.
"
.:, .l_?-..:.!:E.:.-7..1-
:~, ..!1L~L?)LC':i~?)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
..
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
December 6, 1991
Approval of Local Virginia Cooperative Extension Services
Director
As you may recall, Ms. Betty Payne, Director of the local
Cooperative Extension Service for many years, retired this past
September. Mr. Jesse Judy, Cooperative Extension's District
Director, is requesting our approval to appoint Mr. Charles Goodman
as the new local Director.
Staff supports this appointment and recommends your approval.
RWT,Jr/bat
91-112
Attachment
\
VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
VIRGINIA
TECH
Northern District Extension Office
23 West Main street, suite B
Luray, Virginia 22835
703-743-2009
VIRGINIA
STATE
November 26, 1991
COUNTY OF ALBE.lVlf\RLE
~ I~ 11.Jj!""
.DECd~~.
EXECUTIVE OfFICE
Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Albemarle County Administrator
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Tucker:
I am in the process of appointing the unit director for the
Albemarle County/City of Charlottesville Extension office.
I asked all of the agents on the staff to respond to me in
writing indicating whether or not they were interested in being
considered for the appointment. Charles Goodman is the only agent
who is interested. Charles also has the support of the other
agents on the staff.
I plan to appoint Charles as the unit director of the
Albemarle County/City of Charlottesville Extension office. Please
inform me if this meets with the approval of the Board of
Supervisors and yourself.
s. ince.r~e..lY'
~~ II //
;j Jesse . J dy
! District Director
JNJ/wsa
Virginia Cooperative Extension Service is an Educational Service or the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and Virginia State University,
Virginia's Land-Grant Institutions. with U.S. Department of Agriculture and Local Governments Cooperating. Programs, activities, and employment
opportunities are available to all people regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or political affiliation.
An equal opportunity/affirmative action employer.
iz"Ct:,Cif
i ',i! !::::. /1 ;' C' <I. \
. !. '. .;}, J /
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
John G, Milliken
Secretary of Transportation
Office of the Governor
Richmond 23219
(804) 786-8032
TIDD (804;i~6p.
November 26, 1991
;J J~81
The Honorable F. R. Bowie, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Dear Rick:
Thank you for your recent letter and Albewmarle County's
position regarding the proposals set forth in my recent speech to
the Virginia Municipal League.
As I indicated, my purpose in advancing the proposals is to
open a dialogue with local governments on the jurisdictional,
programmatic and organizational aspects of dealing with our
transportation problems in the Commonwealth. A number of
jurisdictions have provided comment and I look forward to
receiving additional input at the hearings in November.
Again, I appreciate your letter and look forward to working
with you in providing the most effective transportation system
for the Commonwealth.
with best regards.
JGM/mwc
cc: Mr. Oscar K. Mabry
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
COUNTY OF f\L8F
r--::~ .-.......
Gn--. rf=3 ,,.--,j ".~) ,
! \ . J ! "....-i..'.........,'
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGI~~~~= ;3 '""'
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION tv, \\ ~':::l.:':: .~I ~:':':
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219
'.?~~:,.2..r._
9L C,-:/t Cs-~_rJ
"
;::, ~,) t
I,
!q
.. '\,':'-
November 26, 1991
Changes in the Primary System
Route 240
Project: 0240-002-102, PE-101,
C-501
Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Board Members:
Changes in the Primary System made necessary by the relocation and
construction on Route 240, Project: 0240-002-102, PE-101, C-501 in Albemarle
County, were confirmed by the Commonwealth Transportation Board on November
21, as shown on the attached sketch and described as follows:
SECTION ABANDONED AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 33. 1-148 OF THE
1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA:
Section 1 - Old location of Route 240, east of the
new location, from Station 53+00
to Station 46+00
O. 13 Mi.
Sincerely,
Q~bJ-
David R. Gehr
Assistant Commissioner
Operations
Attachments
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
MOVED BY
Mr. Musselwhite
, SECONDED BY
Mr. Bacon
, THAT
WHEREAS, Route 240 in Albemarle County has been altered and reconstructed
as shown on plans for Project: 0240-002-102, PE-101, C-501; and
~mEREAS, one section of the old road is no longer necessary as a public
road, the new road serving the same citizens as the old;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 33.1-148 of the
Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, 0.13 mile of Old Route 240, designated
as Section 1 on the plat dated June 11, Project: 0240-002-102, PE-101, C-501,
be abandoned as a part of the State Highway System.
Motion carried.
11 /21 /91
~~<
c: ., go
:I go .
~ ....
....0
-...."
_n"C
t"t
~.
-=
~(JIl 0
\Q~""
-:I
~ ~
~ .,
., go
.... :I
:l al
(JIl"C
(JIl El .... S .."
,.,.~O...~
:r,.,...."""'"
~ IlO
o "" t"t IlO (II
.... Qo :l"(JIl ~
tI> ~ ~
"C I al (JIl
,., V'I n ~
G. 0 IlO <:
l...- """ 9 ::s II
~ 0 "C Co
n "'" """" ~
t"t S ~ "C ....
t"t IlO ....
.... ~ <:
o ~:l"
., ." El .,
., ~ "
" 0 :l IlO
=,--",,.-
t"t" Co
~ n ,... 0
., t"t '< C
l'D . -a ~
"
....tI> 0
"c: ....
:l :l"
I I
, I
I I
/ I
I I
'I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
~i
I I
1./ STA,44+50,OO
I I
\ I
\ \
\ \
\ \
tI>
t"t
IlO
J:o
'"
+
o
o
j~
I
,:;
..,
!
A
I
>
""'
I :;) ::=
" '"
... 3:
C? >
:0
) :;) ""'
:;) '"
"
0
."
x." ('l
~~ 0
N- c
QQ z
.- -;
Sl.AS~ C"l -<
8FlANCH U\
Q
! I
/ I
I r
I
J I
I,
I J
I I
I I
<D"
I I
I
I I
~ ._ ' I
~-__I /
-
" I
, /
~ /
en
t"t
.
VI
'-'
+
o
o
~
);
~
o
STA, 53+ 7500
...
, (,~ I' C'I
.-,., <:::.' \t:>' ;
, (. . .... ~"."."---~--";"~'''-'-''-
1j.(lJI(:5j ~ )
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
COMMONWEALTH of VIR({jRjiJAv 0 F 1\!_ 8 E t} r~' F:
f ;-"', r~ .'-1 ~.' 'r.,:~~:, r~. :,\ r: f:-~,: r::.~.
'I ~ ;,;;:! ~ I)FC 4 '.,.:;~). I ~I~;\ROOSEVELT
ii' \ rENT ENGINEER
1/ \ \, 11'~" > ,- '.~'_.."".-rr;"
I \ I' 'I' .,
J i ;L-~-l 'J t "':::::1 L
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
p, 0, BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902
December 3, 1991
D OF ',:,L! FE t~\i sc>~s
Current Projects
Construction Schedule
Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Miss Neher:
Attached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently
under construction in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is
forwarded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this
matter with them at the next meeting if they so desire.
Yours truly,
1" . S ,K~-'S c).Jt-\ v/
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DSR/smk
attachment
cc: R. Y. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
'"
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
DECEMBER 1, 1991
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+-------------
IROUTE I LOCATION STATUS EST.COMP :
INo. I DATE i
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------~
I
1660
I
I
I BRIDGE OVER S. FORK RIVANNA RIVER
I
CONSTRUCTION 90% COMPLETE
DEC 91
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------~
I I I
1250 I ST. CLAIR AVE. TO RTE. 64 I CONSTRUCTION 17% COMPLETE SEP 93
I I I
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------~
I
I
I
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+-----7-------
I
I
I
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------.
I
I
I
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------c.
* REVISED DATE
** NEW PROJECT
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
-LZ0' 9/
q -'......
-, ~-.-lL?dl.J.i:J )
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
November 20, 1991
Public Information Dissemination
In an effort to identify a low cost yet effective means to
communicate information about County issues and concerns, county
staff will begin submitting information to be used in a mailing
which goes to all Neighborhood Watch Groups throughout the County.
This newsletter, published quarterly, is sent to all Neighborhood
Watch Captains to be distributed to their group and will reach
approximately 6,000 households each issue. A section will be
reserved for news of general county interest and will be useful for
disseminating pertinent facts on current county issues. We will
moni tor this effort and seek feedback from newsletter recipients to
determine if a countywide newsletter should be initiated.
Additionally, as part of our Community Policing initiative,
meetings will be held in each police sector of the County on a
quarterly basis. These meetings will be used by the Police
Department to discuss any issues of concern in each area of the
County and can also be adapted to incorporate a speaker from the
staff and/or the Board to communicate information in a "community
meeting" setting.
Any input the Board might have on either topics of interest or ways
to improve the effort would be greatly appreciated.
RWT,Jr/REH,II/dbm
91.215
tJ
,(,';. L2'& c'j-'
". '._1. -.. .~_.._"",-.,.-.--.!-L.
-iLJ.Ul1f.Cj )
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors ~
County Executiv~1
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
December 2, 1991
RE: Group Health Insurance Coverage
Dr. Paskel and I have recently been discussing our group health
insurance coverage with Dr. Hastings and Mr. Sam Rosenthal, our
insurance consultant. It is Mr. Rosenthal's opinion and recommendation
that the County consider obtaining competitive proposals from both our
current provider, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and other insurance carriers,
early next year. Mr. Rosenthal also indicates that he has assisted
others recently in reducing their group health premium while increasing
their benefits and for that reason is encouraging us to consider
competitively bidding our group health insurance coverage.
Unless you indicate otherwise, I will be requesting Dr. Hastings to
seek competitive negotiable proposals in the near future. Should you
have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
RWT,Jr/bat
91-218
c: Dr. Robert W. paskel
!
. .
Z)~)t:'~:t.ENT CO;',
, ., '
..y. .
, '\~. -
, .~MMONWEALTHOFVlRGINIA9111 20 3 151>'~11
,S'TAlECORPORATION COMMISSI9ti. ,,"'.L?,:[P',91
(,j LJ2.LL(~J /6 )
AT RICHMOND, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
9 \ NO\J \ '3 PH 4: 45
APPLICATION OF
WILTEL OF VIRGINIA, INC.
CASE
(;CHJ NTY Of tv. pr.~fl!.\ Pi r..
N~n r~.fr3tR:~"nI1,':!~!.'t~;:;; . ',- <.
IliiF ',,:, Ii
il: 1, " \ \
I,>' 0"(:('" ') 1:491 I,;,
I ) 1 \ \. l,~ J f:W ~. I \
i i ~. '\ f " ,1 \
tJ :-...': ~..~>,'''...~~:~ ',~','.':-~.r>,/\..
For a certificate of public convenience
and necessity to provide inter-LATA,
interexchange telephone service in Virginia
and to have rates determined competitively
. ",I,. \'
1 \) ~'\ L) I"
ORDER PRESCRIBING NOTICE
On OCtober 17, 1991, WilTel of Virginia, Inc. ("WilTel"
or "Applicant") filed its application for a certificate of
public convenience and necessity to provide inter-LATA,
interexchange telephone service within the Commonwealth and to
have its rates determined competitively.
NOW, THE COMMISSION is of the opinion that WilTel's
application should be docketed, public notice of the application
should be given, and, if sufficient objections are received, a
public hearing to consider the application should be scheduled.
Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
(1) That this case is docketed and assigned Case
No. PUC910037;
(2) That the Applicant forthwith give notice to ~he public
of its application by publishing as display advertising (not
classified advertising), on one occasion the following notice in
newspapers having general circulation throughout the
Commonwealth:
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF AN APPLICATION
BY WILTEL OF VIRGINIA, INC., FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
TO PROVIDE LONG-DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE
WITHIN VIRGINIA AND TO HAVE ITS
RATES DETERMINED COMPETITIVELY
On October 17, 1991, WilTel of Virginia,
Inc. ("WilTel") filed an application with the
Virginia State Corporation Commission for a
certificate of public convenience and
necessity authorizing it to provide inter-
exchange inter-LATA long distance service
throughout the Commonwealth with its rates to
be determined competitively.
The corporation Commission will schedule
a public hearing on the application of WilTel
if sufficient objections are lodged against
the application. Copies of the application
are available for public inspection in the
Commission's Document Control Center, located
on Floor B-1 of the Jefferson Building, Bank
and Governor Streets, Richmond, Virginia,
open Monday through Friday 8:15 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. or can be ordered from WilTel's
attorneys, Brad E. Mutschelknaus, Esquire,
Jane A. Fisher, Esquire, and Kurt E. DeSota,
Esquire, Wiley, Rein, and Fielding, 1776 K
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.
Any person wishing to lodge an objection
to the application of WilTel should submit
the objection in writing to William J.
Bridge, Clerk, Document Control Center, P.o.
Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216 on or
before December 31, 1991 and should refer to
Case No. PUC 910037.
WILTEL OF VIRGINIA, INC.
(3) That Applicant, on or before November 30, 1991, give
notice of its application to each local exchange telephone
company operating in Virginia; to each interexchange carrier
certificated in Virginia; and to the Division of Consumer
Counsel, Office of the Attorney General by personal delivery or
by first-class mail, postage prepaid to the customary place of
business or residence of the person served;
2
..
(4) That on or before November 30, 1991, the Applicant
furnish a copy of this order to the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors of every county in Virginia and the mayor or city
manager of each city or town in Virginia (or on equivalent
officials in counties, cities and towns having alternate forms of
government) by personal delivery or first-class mail, postage
prepaid to the customary place of business or residence of the
person served;
(5) That if sufficient objections to WilTel's application
are received on or before December 31, 1991, the Commission will
schedule a public hearing concerning each portion of the
application; otherwise, the Commission may grant the requested
certificate and authority for competitive rates without
conducting a hearing; and
(6) That on or before December 31, 1991, Applicant file
proof of notice as described above.
ATTESTED COPIES hereof shall be sent by the Clerk of the
Commission to Brad E. Mutschelknaus, Esquire, Jane A. Fisher,
Esquire, and Kurt E. DeSota, Esquire, Wiley, Rein, and Fielding,
1776 K street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006; to the Division of
Consumer Counsel, Office of the Attorney General, 101 North 8th
Street, 6th Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219; to the Commission's
Office of General Counsel; and to the Commission's Divisions of
Communications, Public utility Accounting, Economics and Finance,
and Public Service Taxation.
.".,~.
~T~u..Copyl) ll'I(),~' --r I'J~' .'
lest@: 1v~ ~.1/J1
, . -~"". _ Cr~rk of the
;.,~ J '., ~ts~ C(jrpgrAtlen Commission ~.
3
-...
C',: r.:~n ;,';:, ;~;:.\)
,'" .' c. J
~_.i:-~J..J
- q I :J.,Z1[LhL./) r__
..
CLINTON V. TURNER
COMMISSIONER
u
fi~;'\
\; ~ \
\ ~) \
I _, ~.'; r~ ("'
I'
\ :1
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI'A '
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
p, 0, Box 1163, Richmond, Virginia 23209
(804) 786-3501
Facsimile (804) 371-7679
i "\;';i
:'~ ; -:, ' ,., '.
November 26, 1991
(,..
.l.C
Dear Friend:
We are most pleased to share with you the attached Strategic Plan for the Virginia
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
As an organization, we are constantly reviewing all of our programs and activities to
determine how we might provide more effective, efficient and progressive services to
our clients. Our Agency Strategic Plan and complementing division and unit
operating plans are major components in providing quality services. The
Department's planning process has included input from VDACS staff, the participants
of the Commissioner's Forum on Agriculture, Virginia Board of Agriculture and
Consumer Services and other client groups.
The information contained in this plan has been condensed for your convenience
and by no means represents the entirety of our strategic plan or operating plans.
Our internal documents reflect both performance measures and time frames to
assure proper implementation.
As always, we would appreciate your comments and suggestions as to how we
might improve our services.
Sincerely,
&~
Clinton V. Turner
G d Ch · !J1~~\YOFAL8Ei\.M~F::\
reenwoo emlcUfr;~\, ,1~(f{LC::D,:'~\,CC~' : \1.'\
\) 1;..>" , \
i' l. 2 1"""1 '\ \..
\~\, nEe ..,N . j\
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
&EPA
Albemarle County, Virginia
Keeping You Informed
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) has
prepared this fact sheet to update you onEP A's cleanup of
the Greenwood Chemical Site and provide answers to
some of your questions.
Public Meeting
EP A will hold a public meeting about its plan to tear down
and remove Site buildings. Staff from EPA and the U.S.
Anny Corps of Engineers will be on hand to present
infonnation and address any questions you might have.
Meeting date, time, and location are:
Thursday, December 5 at 7:00 p.m.
Emmanuel Episcopal Church
Route 250
Greenwood, V A
What Has Happened Recently?
EPA is continuing its long-term, remedial action to ad-
dress soil, lagoon water, and ground water contamination
at the Greenwood Chemical Site.
Water Treatment. The water cleanup will involve pumping
water out of the ground and removing chemicals from it in
a water treatment building to be built on the Site. EP A has
offered Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) the opportu-
nity to design & implement this groundwater remedy. Note
thatnoPRPhas agreed totheperfonn the worle. Atthistime,
EP A is considering whether to order any of the PRP's to
perfonn the worle. EP A also has the option of using
Superfund money to pay for the worle.
Soil Treatment. 'This past July, EP A armounced its inten-
tion to dismantle and remove three process buildings on
the Site. This action will pennit further investigation of
soils underlying the buildings. To the extent appropriate,
*
Printed on recycled paper
~LZ. '~9.C
Q/,/2f/
December 1991
i,
f'
Region III
Superfund Program
Fact Sheet
i:
, .
;L~
EP A plans to address soils under the buildings during the
soil cleanup. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will
oversee this activity for the EP A. EP A also plans to
remove containers of chemicals stored' in the process
buildings and take them offsite for disposal. EP A expects
to complete its soil cleanup plans in early 1992. At that
time, it will offer the PRPs an opportunity to perfonn the
soil cleanup.
EPA Answers Your Questions
In June 1991, staff from EP A and the Virginia Department
of Waste Management spoke with local residents to learn
more about their Site-related questions and concerns. In
August, EPA prepared and mailed a fact sheet which
included answers to some of the questions that came up
during those infonnal community interviews. Following
are some additional questions from the June interviews,
with answers provided by EP A.
Q. What is the difference between EPA's removal
and remedial programs?
A. The removal program involves short-tenn actions to
address immediate threats to human health or the environ-
ment posed by rekascs or potential releases of hazardous
substances. Removal actions can be implemented quickly
and don't require detailed planning. The remedial pro-
gram involves long-tenn actions to address releases or
potential releases of hazardous substances which are not
an immediate threat but still pose a danger. Remedial
actions require extensive planning and can take up to 7 to
10 years to complete.
Q. If I test my own well, what should I test for?
A. If residents decide to test their own wells. they should
test for volatile organics, semi-volatile organics, and
inorganics (such as metals). It costs approximately $1,000
per well to test for these contaminants.
Q. IfI live above the Site, do I need to worry about well
contamination?
A. EPA's investigations indicate that ground water is
flowing southeast from the Site. There are no residences
located close to the Site in this direction. Residents who
live north of the Site should not experience Site-related
well contamination.
Q. Where are the residential wells that EPA tested in
relation to the Site?
A. In the last round of residential well sampling, EP A
sampled 8 wells and found trace levels of some contami-
nants in certain wells which mayor may not be Site-
related. Dr. Dick Brunker, EP A Toxicologist assigned to
the Site, says that these levels pose no health risk. The 8
wells are located east, west, and south of the Site. Since
1987, EP A has sampled 28 different residential wells on
different occasions and found no significant Site-related
impact.
Q. What sort of monitoring will EPA do during the
start-up of the water treatment plant?
A. EPA will place piezometers (monitoring wells) around
each extraction well in order to monitor water levels and
ensure that primarily contaminated water (not clean wa-
ter) is extracted for treatment. EP A will put the extraction
wells into operation gradually and monitor them carefully
to ensure that the residential well supplies are protected.
Q. How can residents find out what chemicals are
kept at the Site now? Does the Local Emergency
Planning Committee know?
A. The Virginia Departtnent of Waste Management and
Charlottesville's Local Emergency Planning Committee
(LEPC) report that the Greenwood Chemical Company
has not notified them under the provisions of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title III
law of any chemical storage on the Site. SARA Title III
includes emergency planning, notification, and reporting
requirements affecting manufacturers and handlers of
hazardous substances. The majority of chemicals stored
on-site are expected to be removed by the EP A & Anny
Corps of Engineers during the upcoming action. If resi-
dents have further questions about this issue, they can call
Mr. Kaye Harden of the LEPC at (804) 971-3462.
For More Information
EP A has established a local infonnation repository in
orderto give you access to documents about the Greenwood
Chemical Site and the Superfund process. It is located at:
Crozet Branch Library
Box 430
Crozet, VA 22932
(804) 823-4050
If you would like more infonnation or have any questions
or concerns about the Site, please contact:
Amy Barnett (3EA21)
Community Relations Coordinator
U.S. EPA, Region III
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
(215) 597-6915
---------------------------------------
Mailing List Additions/Questions and Comments
If you would like to be on our mailing list to receive additional fact sheets about the Greenwood Chemical Site, please
complete this fonn and mail it to: Amy Barnett (3EA21), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 841 Chestnut Building,
Philadelphia, PA 19107. If you have a question or comment about the Site, please write it below.
Name
Street Address
City/State/Zip
Te1ephoneNumber
Question or Comment
, I L .(o.q/
,!.,.,....._....,~,'-,
_q 1,11: i (([..Lv )
1"'.1.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
It
TO:
Albemarle County Board
DATE:
December 4, 1991
of SUperViSOrS,e ~~
County Executi~L/VvJl
~
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
RE: Scottsville Annexation Committee Update
Following several meetings between representatives of the Town of Scottsville and the County,
two potential options for a boundary adjustment by the Town of Scottsville are under review
and attached for information to the Board.
Titled Option 4, this proposal represents a smaller land area and an estimated loss to the
County of $50,614 annually. It stops short of picking up Stony Point subdivision and some
industrially zoned land on Route 726.
Option 5 provides a larger land area and would result in an annual revenue loss of
approximately $61,398. It would include the Stony Point residential area and industrial land
to the north of this subdivision. As you can see, the difference in the revenue loss is
largely attributable to the sales tax distribution based on school-aged children.
Neither proposal includes significant undeveloped land in the Totier Creek watershed as did
earlier proposals. Both options include the shopping center and surrounding area down to
the Scottsville Volunteer Fire Department.
The committee has asked Scottsville Town Council to respond to these two options. Once that
input is received, both governing bodies will be asked to authorize a public forum to be held
in the area to seek comments from those affected. Following the public forum, if both
governing bodies agree to proceed further, a formal public hearing must be held by both
governing bodies and a request made for the Circuit Court to enter an order approving a
boundary adjustment.
A larger map reflecting these two options as well as current zoning designations is available
in Room 11 on the 4th floor of the County Office Building if you should need additional
detail. Once the Town of Scottsville has responded, time will be set aside on a future
agenda to thoroughly discuss the issue and options. In the interim, if there should be any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or Rick Huff.
RWT,Jr/REH,II/dbm
91. 225
Attachment
NOVEMBER 26, 1991
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
ESTIMATE OF REVENUE LOSS FOR SCOTTSVILLE ANNEXATION
OPTION #4
BASIS COUNT RATE TAX
UTILITY TAX
RESIDENTIAL # RESIDENCES 66 4/MO $3,168
COMMERCIAL AVG BILL 27 6, 312
INDUSTRIAL AVG BILL 1 4,080
BUSINESS LICENSES GROSS RECEIPTS 24 26,231
SALES TAX # STUDENTS 23 4,082
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY GROSS RENTS 2,511
VEHICLE LICENSE PER VEHICLE 188 22.50 4,230
TOTAL $50,614
OPTION #5
BASIS COUNT RATE TAX
UTILITY TAX
RESIDENTIAL # RESIDENCES 98 4/MO $4,704
COMMERCIAL AVG BILL 27 6,312
INDUSTRIAL AVG BILL 1 4,080
BUSINESS LICENSES GROSS RECEIPTS 24 26,231
SALES TAX # STUDENTS 67 11,890
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY GROSS RENTS 2,511
VEHICLE LICENSE PER VEHICLE 252 22.50 5,670
TOTAL $61,398
;:,
'" ""_/. , ~ 19A ' r
..~ /.
~_~_-L '
19 ' ~ / '< ----J,
/
~.//
. ..x
, 26
""
\
\
\ 'y--\=:::- -i-
\ (~J \
~ _+\-11
17,\ - ,
I 2'K I
25
........
OITION 4
onION 5
,..
...
Z
?
o
'"
IlIlIlUIII!llIllIlllIlIllI
'-'
",,'
. \
',-
~'Iyt 12 I" \ ~ l
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
''> r" i' ~.~ T\.' r' r:: 1'\\ P ;~.. '~\;,;\ \."{, -; \'=
l,\J'.II. I I ,,II ,',C..'" ,- ,.".. ......
n:::-. G::'J ('~ fr':,; r'i '\"\ .1') ;.'i'.':~' i';':~\
1\.1" - -....-.........-...............-..,..' "."
I j '-..- .. >'<:'1 1,1
"V.... I \ I r
I 1 'I \ " (,
U. 0 EC 1 0 1991 \ : i i;
I',' I., .1.
.\ / Ii jl
,_...., ;' II i
::J (0 fL.\ L \.1 L::::'l L:;:'J
UPERV1SORS
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
DATE:
December 10, 1991
RE:
Supplemental Information on Scottsville Annexation Issue
As many of you know, the VML/VACO Joint Annexation Task Force has been attempting
to reach agreement on future annexation procedures for several years. Recent
actions by both VACO and VML have created interesting twists which are important
to share on this issue.
VACO's Executive Board failed, several months ago, to ratify the joint agreement
which had been developed and approved by VML. According to VACO staff, there are
approximately 12 counties actively opposing the draft that was released. At
VML's annual conference in November, their Executive Committee placed a January
1, 1992 deadline on joint agreement and if it cannot be reached, VML has voted
to move ahead with the version that they ratified in order to seek legislation
in the 1992 session of the General Assembly.
VACO representatives on the Joint Task Force met on December 9, 1991 and agreed
to submit several proposed changes to VML which may make opposing counties more
comfortable. The county representatives do not plan to be prepared to seek
legislation in the 1992 session and will be asking that the existing city
moratorium continue.
The Grayson Commission, also studying annexation, has apparently disbanded and
plans no further proposals. It is clearly up to VACO and VML to resolve the
unanswered issues. It may also be important to note that even under the VML-VACO
agreement being contemplated, no legislation would be effective until 1995
following a Constitutional Amendment referendum.
This information is provided to keep you aware of other actions being
contemplated regarding annexation. The VACO-VML draft, in its present state,
clearly makes it easier for towns to annex and should, therefore, be closely
monitored by staff for its potential impact.
RWT,Jr/REH,II/dbm
91. 238
,l"?:fq':1L
_C)f,IZI! (~JS)
k.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
December 4, 1991
Proposed Legislation for Land-Use Tax, Local
Agricultural/Forestal Districts and Decal Fines
At the November 13, 1991 meeting, the Board approved submitting
three specific legislative amendments to the 1992 General Assembly
Session: one, to allow Albemarle County to eliminate land use
value taxation in designated growth areas; two, to enable Albemarle
County to authorize local agricultural/forestal districts; and
three, to allow the Police Department to ticket parked vehicles
without a county decal.
The language in these three amendments, which has been prepared by
the County Attorney, is presented here for your information. These
amendments will also be included as part of the legislative
discussion on December 18.
(1) Land-Use Taxation
Section 58.1-3231. "The local governing body ~li-r&1:ia~ .:69
.e;ee:ei-ea 5S .-3:--3-r;r. i- may provide in the ordinance that property
located in specified zoning districts or areas designated for
growth by the local Comprehensive Plan shall not be eligible for
special assessment as provided in this article." In this
amendment.
"Pursuant to Section 58.1-3237.1" refers to the code section that
now grants authority to enact provisions based on zoning
classifications to only those counties adjacent to counties with
the urban County Executive form of government, i.e. Loudoun and
Prince William. Deleting this section will, therefore, enable all
Counties including Albemarle to have this authority.
(2) Local Agricultural/Forestal Districts. Section 15.1-1513.3
"Local Governing Body" shall mean the governing body of any county
having the urban County Executive form of government and any
count~(ies) with a population of no less than 85,000 and no more
than 90,000 or no less than 63,400 and no more than 73,900.
~.
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
December 4, 1991
RE: Proposed Legislation for Land-Use
Agricultural/Forestal Districts, and Decal Fines
Page 2
Tax,
Local
(3) County Decal Ticketing - NEW CODE SECTION LANGUAGE
46.2-1240. Parking on public property or in privately owned
parking areas open to the public; enforcement. No vehicles other
than those displaying license plates or decals as required by 46.2-
752 shall park in any parking spaces on public property or in
privately owned parking areas open to the public. A summons or
parking ticket for the offense may be issued by law-enforcement
officers or uniformed law-enforcement department employees.
In any prosecution charging a violation of this section, proof that
the vehicle described in the summons or parking ticket, citation,
or warrant was parked in violation of this section, together with
proof that the defendant was at the time the registered owner of
the vehicle, as required by Chapter 6 of this title, shall
constitute in evidence a prima facie presumption that the
registered owner of the vehicle was the person who committed the
violation.
RWT,Jr/RWW/dbm
91. 226
_ ~ __, ;:", I?~-<<.;/i
l"'nl I'.' -YLL?"''//(?2J (p)
~.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Office of the Superintendent
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
"
TO:
F.R. Bowie, Chairman, Board of Supervisors
FROM:
Clifford W. Haury, Chairman, School Board
Gur
RE:
School Board Action on the Proposed New Middle School
DATE:
December 5, 1991
In light of the questions raised last night at the Supervisors' public
hearing on the Capital Improvements Program recommendations for 1992-93, I am
sending you a calendar and actions of the School Board on the proposed middle
school.
May 8, 1991. Joint Meeting of the School Board and Board of
Supervisors. Presentation of the Preliminary Report on Middle and
High Schools (Attachment 1 - Minutes of May 8, 1991 meeting).
May 23, 1991. Oversight Committee for Long-Range Planning.
Revision of Preliminary Report to "Report on Middle and High
Schools," dated May 23, 1991 to be presented to the Albemarle
County School Board on May 28, 1991.
May 28, 1991. Albemarle County School Board. School Board
received the report and voted 5 to 1 in support of building a new
middle school (Attachment 2 - Excerpt of minutes of May 28, 1991
meeting) .
June 4, 1991. Memorandum from Robert W. paskel, Division
Superintendent to Robert W. Tucker, Jr. Notification of School
Board action on middle and high school (Attachment 3).
June 12, 1991. Memorandum from Al Reaser, Director of Building
Services, to Clifford W. Haury, Chairman, Long Range Planning
Committee. Cost estimates to be used in discussion with the Board
of Supervisors at the Joint Meeting, June 12, 1991 (Attachment 4)
June 25, 1991. Albemarle County School Board meeting. Adoption
of the Capital Improvements Program for 1992-93 through 1996-97.
I hope this information clears up any questions that you may have. The
Albemarle County School Board and the OVersight Committee for Long-Range
Planning have given serious consideration to the middle school question and
have sought School Board discussion and approval by vote.
"We &pect Success"
, .
-2-
A final reminder that I would offer you is that I appeared with Mr.
Reaser and Ms. Holt at your November 13, 1991 work session on the Capital
Improvements Program and reviewed with you the recommendations, including the
middle school and the enrollment package to support them. At that time, the
Board of Supervisors did not indicate that they had serious reservations about
the project nor did they offer questions about the School Board's prior
actions. I would have welcomed the opportunity to answer any inquiries on
that occasion.
If there are further questions about the middle school, the School Board
will be ready to meet with the Board of Supervisors at your convenience.
cc: Dr. Robert Paskel
Mr. Robert Tucker
Mr. Al Reaser
School Board Members
CWH/cs
Distributed to Board: -Ll.:.:....re:3,I
Ageneja Item No. .2.LJ.l./ /:J? Qj
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
David p, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F. Perkins
Wh,te Hall
F, R (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
DATE: December 6, 1991
SUBJECT: Reading List for December 11, 1991
April 10, 1991 - p~~es 15 - 26 (Item #10)
pagQ--,5-4-{-a.fter l'.rticle 27)
ML. Way
end
~-~o-.Q
001;8. Humphris
\~RJ
LEN:ec
".
-~
II
~ '.".~.,' ,J Ll
'\. ~~...;.'~.'~ - -
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charlqtte Y,. Humphris
Jack JoueU
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F Perkins
While Hall
F. R, (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
December 12, 1991
Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
Department of Transportation
PO Box 2013
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Roosevelt:
At its meeting on December II, 1991, the Board of Supervisors took the
following actions:
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matters: Work Session: Six-Year Road Plan.
The Board made the following comments:
1. Requested that the priority list include a column to show where funds are
transferred within the plan when funding totals for projects change;
2. Requested a clarification on the status of the Meadow Creek Parkway
project;
3. Board members to submit questions on various projects to the staff;
4. Requested the staff to schedule a meeting with the two newly elected
supervisors to provide them with an overview of the projects in the plan
prior to the January work session;
5. Set the work session on the Six Year Plan for the January, 1992, day meet-
ing;
6. Requested a follow-up on the status of the Millington Bridge project.
Agenda Item No. 7b. City/County/University Resolution re: Road Improve-
ments. AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the attached resolution.
Agenda Item No. 7c. Report from County Attorney on private condemnation
laws in Virginia. Staff to prepare a letter to be given to the legislators on
December 18 requesting their support of the attached language recommended by the
County Attorney.
;g;z.? /~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
LEN:ec
Attachments
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the City of Charlottesville, the County
and the University of Virginia have reviewed the
proposed by the Virginia Commonwealth Transportation
for the 29 North Corridor; and
of Albemarle
improvements
Board ( CTB )
WHEREAS, the City, County and University believe a unified and
cooperative implementation agreement with the CTB and the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDoT) is necessary to provide for
these improvements in an expeditious and efficient manner;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City, County and
University jointly support and request that the CTB and VDoT
implement improvements to the 29 North Corridor in the following
sequence:
o Widen Route 29 North as provided for in 1985 Charlottes-
ville Area Transportation Study;
o Design the North Grounds connector road facility;
o Address each element of CTB Phase I recommendation of
November 15, 1990;
o Construct the Meadowcreek Parkway from the Route 250
By-Pass to U. S. 29 North as soon as funding is avail-
able;
o Construct grade-separated interchanges on U. S. 29 North
at Hydraulic Road (Rt. 743), Greenbrier Drive (Rt. 866)
and Rio Road (Rt. 631) with early acquisition of right-
of-way for these interchanges based upon hardship (same
program being used for early acquisition for Alternative
10 - Western alignment);
o Construct an alternate controlled vehicle access for
traffic bound for University areas only, including the
north grounds from Route 29/250 By-Pass;
o Complete remainder of CTB Phase II recommendation of
November 15, 1990; and
o Construct Alternative 10 after completion of the above
and when traffic on Route 29 is unacceptable and economic
conditions permit, concurrent with remainder of 1985
Charlottesville Area Transportation Study.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be
transmitted to the Virginia Secretary of Transportation, the
Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation and the
Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO),
requesting the MPO to amend the Charlottesville Area Transportation
Study to reflect this resolution's priorities.
~#2- ~'o
F. R. Bowie, Chairman
Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
Date: ~r//PI
Alvin Edwards, Mayor
City of Charlottesville
Date:
John T. Casteen, President
University of Virginia
Date:
Sec. 33.1-18.1. Acquisition of Right of Way within three
years of location.-- Within three years of the location of any
route by the Board purs~ant to Sec. 33.1-18, the Board shall,
pursuant to Secs. 33.1-138 and 33.1-139, proceed to acquire all
properties to constitute right of way for the route or routes so
located.
With respect to routes located prior to the effective date
of this section, the Board shall acquire the properties to
constitute such right of way within three years of the effective
date of this section.
Compensation shall be the fair market value of such
properties on the date of location by the Board or on the date of
acquisition, whichever is greater.
Upon failure of the Board to comply with this section,
owners of such properties shall be entitled to bring an action in
the circuit court wherein their respective properties lie, to
injoin the Board immediately to institute proceedings for the
acquisition of such properties in accord with this section.
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
If!
I: L
ll;f. el?-h\ ~
-t
/1, /97/
/J IJ ,')
1 /~JC,)
\~ ~ ciCu,{ )~ic7J/.-
r! .1L. ( f
\/ j
Form. 3
7/25/86
q /, I 2 1/. Y () 2--
( , {J
i~ Y lJ~ iLL ;( taL,
/
') (j-
it t- fie.- Je .) &K ~
~ \
, t
RES 0 L UTI 0 Ni" .
L l.
BOAi,L' . .'
WHEREAS, the City of Charlottesville, the County "6fr\A~tbemarle
and the University of Virginia have reviewed the improvements
proposed by the Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB)
for the 29 North Corridor; and
WHEREAS, the City, County and University believe a unified and
cooperative implementation agreement with the CTB and the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDoT) is necessary to provide for
these improvements in an expeditious and efficient manner;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City, County and
University jointly support and request that the CTB and VDoT
implement improvements to the 29 North Corridor in the following
CON"C't""!I,...O.
o....J_":1\.A,........""'- .
o Widen Route 29 North as provided for in 1985 Charlottes-
ville Area Transportation Study;
o Design the North Grounds connector road facility;
o Address each element of CTB Phase I recommendation of
November 15, 1990;
o Construct the Meadowcreek Parkway from the Route 250
By-Pass to U. S. 29 North as soon as funding is avail-
able;
o Construct grade-separated interchanges on U. S. 29 North
at Hydraulic Road (Rt. 743), Greenbrier Drive (Rt. 866)
and Rio Road (Rt. 631) with early acquisition of right-
of-way for these interchanges based upon hardship (same
program being used for early acquisition for Alternative
10 - Western alignment);
o Construct an alternate controlled vehicle access for
traffic bound for University areas only! including the
north grounds from Route 29/250 By-Pass;
o Complete remainder of CTB Phase II recommendation of
November 15, 1990; and
o Construct Alternative 10 after completion of the above
and when traffic on Route 29 is unacceptable and economic
conditions permit, concurrent with remainder of 1985
Charlottesville Area Transportation Study.
.. ..
BE IT E1JRTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be
transmitted to the Virginia Secretary of Transportation, the
Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation and the
Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO),
requesting the MPO to amend the Charlottesville Area Transportation
Study to reflect this resolution's priorities.
dlL ~ '0
F. R. Bowie, Chairman
Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
Date: At/r,,/YI'
Oi...Ja CL
Alvin Edwards, Mayor
City of Charlottesville
----
I.J-/; (, / C; I
, ..
~ .
o n T. Casteen, President
University of Virginia
Da te : "'t. I "l--I '1 z....
.
..
, ' ''''''\
~ "',. 'j i
10liJ Lr' U
F, R (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
December 13, 1991
Charlotte Y Humphns
Jack Jouell
Edward H. Barn. Jr
Samuel Miller
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
The Honorable Alvin Edwards
Mayor, City of Charlottesville
PO Box 911
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mayor Edwards:
At its meeting on December 11, 1991, the Board of Supervisors
authorized the Chairman to sign the attached resolution concerning
proposed improvements by the Commonwealth Transportation Board for
the Route 29 North Corridor. This resolution is forwarded to you
for consideration by City Council and then should be forwarded to
the University of Virginia for its action. Please return a copy of
the City Council's action on the resolution for our files.
Very truly yours,
d!h;~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
LEN:ec
Attachment
It n;
_,-z.(p'J/
._9LL?-!Lj!~~.
I;,
to
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Charlottesville, the County of Albemarle and the University of Virginia
have reviewed the improvements proposed by the Virginia Commonwealth
Transportation Board (CTB) for the 29 North Corridor, AND
WHEREAS, the City, County and University believe a unified and cooperative implementation
agreement with the CTB and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDoT) is
necessary to provide for these improvements in an expeditious and efficient
manner, NOW THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City, County and University jointly support and request that the CTB
and VDoT implement improvements to the 29 North Corridor in the following
sequence:
o Widen Route 29 North as provided for in 1985 Charlottesville Area
Transportation Study;
o Design the North Grounds connector road facility;
o Address each element of CTB Phase I recommendation of November 15, 1990;
o Construct the Meadowcreek Parkway from the Route 250 By-pass to U.S. 29 North
as soon as funding is available;
o Construct grade-separated interchanges on U.S. 29 North at Hydraulic Road (Rt.
743), Greenbrier Drive (Rt. 866) and Rio Road (Rt. 631) with early acquisition
of right-of-way for these interchanges based upon hardship (same program being
used for early acquisition for Alternative 10 - Western alignment);
o Construct an alternate controlled vehicle access for traffic bound for
University areas only, including the north grounds from Route 29/250 By-Pass;
o Complete remainder of CTB Phase II recommendation of November 15, 1990; and
o Construct Alternative 10 after completion of the above and when traffic on
Route 29 is unacceptable and economic conditions permit, concurrent with
remainder of 1985 Charlottesville Area Transportation Study.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the Virginia
Secretary of Transportation, the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of
Transportation and the Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO), requesting the MPO to amend the Charlottesville Area
Transportation Study to reflect this resolution's priorities.
F. R. Bowie, Chairman
Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
Alvin Edwards, Mayor
City of Charlottesville
John T. Casteen, President
University of Virginia
Date:
Date:
Date:
RWT,Jr/dbm
91. 184
., ,
DATE
Ac
/I J /97/
AGENDA ITEM NAME
1/, tOJ tp/~LfI
~PIfYI ~~}v\ C, A. 01 C''YIdemlllH1v,.)
AGENDA ITEM NO.
DEFERRED UNTIL
{~~C
,~ ,/CJCJ;;l
Form. 3
7/25/86
, ....
..
t~
6-.R,
$'('" ~~. k~nda item No, q I. (O/~ .~v:/
---......,..,
Sec. 33.1-18.1. Acquisition of Right of Way within three
years of location.-- Within three years of the location of any
route by the Board pursuant to Sec. 33.1-18, the Board shall,
pursuant to Sees. 33.1-138 and 33.1-139, proceed to acquire all
properties to constitute right of way for the route or routes so
located.
With respect to routes located prior to the effective date
of this section, the Board shall acquire the properties to
constitute such right of way within three years of the effective
date of this section.
Compensation shall be the fair market value of such
properties on the date of location by the Board or on the date of
acquisition, whichever is greater.
Upon failure of the Board to comply with this section,
owners of such properties shall be entitled to bring an action in
the circuit court wherein their respective properties lie, to
injoin the Board immediately to institute proceedings for the
acquisition of such properties in accord with this section.
)>
<,.-
"
,z. 'I. "j
~ ,"rr '_L._,J{.)j~J_
_:11i(?1L(J.j}! )
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
..
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
December 2, 1991
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Peyton Drive - Public Hearing for Vacation
After further reviewing the status of Commonwealth Drive and Peyton
Drive with the County Engineer and County Attorney, I am
recommending that the public hearing to vacate the right-of-way on
Peyton Drive be deferred until the Spring of 1992. This
recommendation will not delay the construction of Commonwealth
Drive nor the closing of Peyton Drive to through traffic once the
extension to Commonwealth Drive is in service.
Postponing the public hearing will allow for:
o Work to be completed on Commonwealth and Peyton Drives
scheduled for the Spring of 1992.
o Development of a plat precisely locating the new
property lines and easements for adjoining properties;
o Reaching an agreement with adjoining property owners
and obtaining the necessary road maintenance agreements
in conjunction with the vacating of the right-of-way.
Staff will continue to coordinate this with adjacent property
owners as we move forward with the construction. A specific date
for public hearing will be recommended to you in March or April.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
RWT,Jr/RBB/dbm
91. 223
cc: Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering
I
I
I
n
1\
I
.
.
a
.
.
.
.
~.
~
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
.
. ..
.
.
.
. . It '.
.CD
@
...... L..
, ,. '"
V Otc.A \.C\ Ctsrr\4) i {4 L
"--
~Nt1I'\TG1.S c...e.aEIL ~L E:STA IE
'-.....1
...
---
- - - lI'"
..
I
I
...
r'
I
j
"
~
CHARLOTTESVILLE DISTRICT
SECTION S'-Vi
.
'" '~l
,( ,
;\
:.,,j
Edward H. Bain, Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charlotte Y Humphns
,j,Kl<. .JOUl'tl
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F. Perkins
Whitt' Hall
F. R, (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scottsvdle
November 14, 1991
Mr. George R. st. John
County Attorney
416 Park Street
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. St. John:
At its meeting on November 13, the Board set a public hearing
for December 11, 1991, to vacate the Peyton Drive public right-of-
way from Commonwealth Drive to Greenbrier Drive. Please draft
the appropriate ordinance since this is not a public road. I
take for granted that we are vacating a portion of the plat under
Section 15.1-482(b). Please provide the above information before
November 20, as this office must prepare the proper advertisement
and notification.
Very truly yours,
~. -
Lettie E.
LEN:ec
cc: Robert B. Brandenburger
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
I~! e tI, f'fl/
QIII/I'3.113
0(1./\ Cc {1) ~k(/YJ
,{ hAALa-u:; j 7
Form. 3
7/25/86
tz,v(p ''i-(
ql,/O OZI'I'i ~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE,
U'- Fe " ".1
,: I) l;;I:;J
...-.., ;,..,
, .
i ,I J
L,. ....1
r,~ '~ is;_ ./ Ll ~,).
: ~ !
MEMORANDUM
.)~-j
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors . 4
~;>-
County Executive~
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
December 6, 1991
RE: Private Roads
In considering the adoption of VDoT' s mountainous terrain and
rolling terrain standards for incorporation into the County's
Subdivision Ordinance, the Board requested information on our
ability to ensure private road construction meets acceptable
standards. As discussed below, staff position is that current
policies, procedures and practices are adequate to ensure private
roads are constructed to acceptable standards.
Background:
The authority and standards for private roads as outlined in the
subdivision ordinance specify:
- Plans have to follow design standards given in the
ordinance; and
- Roads shall be bonded to ensure construction and completion
to design standards; and
- A sworn affidavit that improvements conform to approved
plans and applicable sections of the ordinance.
Private road inspection procedures have changed over the past three
years. Prior to the addition of a full-time road inspector in
1988, private road inspection was limited. Since 1988, the
Engineering Department inspects both private and public roads with
the vast majority of time being assigned to public roads. This is
driven by the larger number of public road projects; 84% of
sites/subdivisions with roads under bond are public road projects.
The inspector checks the private road to ensure that it meets plan
specifications by checking the thickness of the aggregate base
prior to any paving, verifying the width of the road; verifying the
road alignment and verifying it meets all other plan requirements.
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
December 6, 1991
RE: Private Roads
Page 2
Additionally, private roads are bonded. The purpose of bonding a
road is to ensure that funds are available to provide a road that
meets the required standards. While some bonds were released with
no recorded inspection, this has not been a recent occurrence.
Staff has recently automated its bond program to improve our
ability to manage this significant administrative process. Current
practice requires all roads to be inspected and verified by the
County Engineer prior to bond release or modification.
Alternatives:
Staff is continuing to pursue improvements in our procedures and
will be examining the following:
- Increasing frequency of private road inspections;
- Review of the requirements for developers to certify
conformance to plans and standards;
- Requiring a subdivider to provide a one year performance
bond after final acceptance as is currently required
by VDoT on roads accepted into the state secondary
system;
- Review of the bonding process to provide improved
management in an effort to attain earlier completion
of roads; and
- Review the County's role in inspection of public roads.
In summary, County private road inspection procedures are adequate
and the adoption of the proposed VDoT mountainous and rolling
terrain standards are not expected to negatively impact staffs
ability to provide inspection services.
If staff resource issues are identified they will be addressed in
the regular budget process.
RWT,Jr/RBB/dbm
91.233
Distributed to Bo:nd: !lLJ.Zi'll
A j Sr./}., -
gent a Item rvo. 1.11J(),-~.1~3
2r.A 9/. 16IJ.1.4S
. ,.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
" .r
Dept of Planning & CO)l1munity Development: . "
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
~ i '
.: t
r' ;n
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
, ~
Ronald S. Keeler, Chief of Planning1L?
DATE:
September 10, 1991
STA-91-1 Private Roads
ZTA-91-6 Private Roads
RE:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
September 4, 1991 unanimously recommended approval of the
above-noted text amendments. Attached please find a staff
report which outlines these amendments. Please be advised
. that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review
these petitions and receive public comment at their meeting
on October 2. 1991.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
RSK/jcw
ATTACHMENT
.~ ' '~3
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
RONALD S. KEELER
SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OCTOBER 2, 1991
STA-91-01 PRIVATE ROADS INCLUDING ZTA-91-06
ORIGIN: Private Roads Committee; Planning Commission
PUBLIC PURPOSE TO BE SERVED: To revise private road design
standards to duplicate VDOT standards which in turn are
based on (nationally recognized) AASHTO standards.
STAFF COMMENT:
After presentation of the ad hoc Private Roads Committee
report, the Planning Commission on May 7, 1991 adopted a
resolution of intent to amend the County's private roads
provisions in the Subdivision Ordinance in accord with the
recommendations of the Private Roads Committee (Report of
the Private Roads Committee is attached). Staff has
prepared amendments to Section 18-36 accordingly and eac~
amendment is accompanied by "comment".
4.
Pu~lic benefits of these amendments would include the
following:
1.
Current private road standards are literally
untraceable as to origin and represent an amalgamation
of opinion of several past County Engineers. AASHTO
standards are considered to be of national acceptance;
2.
Recently, lot purchasers on private roads have
complained as to "substandard" design. Such complaints
should be allayed by #1 above;
3.
During development of current VDOT design standards,
County staff and local development interests lobbied
strongly for application of various terrain standards
on a local as opposed to regional basis. Should VDOT
follow such course in the future, more private roads
may be eligible for acceptance into the state Secondary
System for maintenance;
An enduring concern is whether or not private roads in
the Rural Areas promote development of marginal or
environmentally sensitive lands which the Comprehensive
Plan may recommend for preservation. This is to say,
do private road provisions promote development contrary
1
to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Staff opinion
is that development in the Rural Areas is primarily
market driven and secondarily controlled by government
regulation and therefore, any contribution to
development as may be realized through private roads is
a secondary factor.
STA-91-01 PRIVATE ROADS
1. Reorganize ~18-36(a) as follows:
ARTICLE III. DESIGN STANDARDS.
DIVISION 6. STREETS
Section 18-36. Private Roads.
Private roads are intended to be permitted as the
exception to construction and dedication of public
roads in the subdivision approval process. Granting of
private road usage shall be discretionary by the
commission and shall be based on the circumstances and
requirements contained herein. Private roads are
intended to promote sensitivity toward the natural
characteristics of the site and to encourage
subdivision consistent and harmonious with surrounding
development. Except as otherwise expressly provided
herein and permitted in accordance with procedures of
~18-36(h), no waiver, modification or variation of
standards, and no exceptions to the application of
these regulations shall be permitted.
(a) Any subdivision, any lot of which is served by a
private road shall be subject to approval by the
commission in accordance with this chapter. Any
further subdivision of land involving additional
use of such road shall be deemed a subdivision
subject to the provisions of this chapter. In
order to insure adequate capacity of such road and
equitable maintenance costs to property owners,
except as the commission may provide in a
particular case, not more than one dwelling unit
shall be located on any parcel served by such
road.
Pr~va~e-reaas-are-~a~eaaea-~e-5e-~erm~~~ea-as-~he
exee~~~ea-~e-eeas~r~e~~ea-aaa-aea~ea~~ea-er-~~5i~e
reaas-~a-~fie-s~5a~v~s~ea-a~~revai-~reeess~--6raa~~a~-er
~r~va~e-reaa-~sa~e-shaii-5e-a~sere~~eaarY-5y-~fie
eemm~ss~en-aaa-shaii-5e-5asea-ea-~he-e~re~s~aaees-aaa
re~~~remea~s-een~a~aea-here~a~--Pr~va~e-reaas-are
~a~eaaea-~e-~reme~e-seas~~~v~~y-~ewara-~fie-aa~~rai
2
eft8r8e~erf~~fe~-er-~fte-~f~e-8~a-~e-e~ee~r8~e
~~~afvf~fe~-ee~~f~~e~~-8~a-ft8rme~fe~~-wf~h-~~rre~~af~~
aeVe%e~me~~~--E~ee~~-8~-e~fterwf~e-e~~re~~%y-~revfaea
fteref~-8~a-~ermf~~ea-f~-8eeera8~ee-wf~ft-~reeea~re~-er
~~8-36fftTT-~e-w8fverT-meafffe8~fe~-er-v8rf8~fe~-er
~~8~a8ra~T-8"a-~e-e~eel'~fe"~-~e-~fte-8~~%fe8~fe~-er
~fteee-re~~%8~fe~e-~ft8%%-~e-~ermf~~ea~
Comment: The second paragraph of current 18-36(a) is
primarily a policy statement and as such should serve as an
introduction to the private roads provisions.
2. Amend ~18-36(b) as follows:
(b) The commission may approve any subdivision served
by one or more private roads under the following
circumstances:
(1) For property zoned RA, Rural Areas, the
subdivider, in accordance with Section
18-36(h) of this chapter, demonstrates to the
reasonable satisfaction of the commission
that:
Approval of such roads will alleviate a
clearly demonstrable danger of significant
degradation to the environment of the site or
adjacent properties which would be occasioned
by the construction of public roads in the
same alignments. For the purposes of this
provision, in addition to such other factors
as the commission may consider, "significant
degradation" shall mean an increase of thirty
(30%) percent in the total volume of grading
for construction of a public road as compared
to a private road~-8~a~ As secondary
considerations. amonq other thinqs. the
commission may consider actual volume
differential as well as surface area
differential and removal of vegetative cover:
and
No alternative public road alignment
available to the subdivider on the adoption
date of this section would alleviate
significant degradation of the environment;
and
No more lots are proposed on such private
road than could be realized on a public road
due to right-of-way dedication. (AMENDED
11-16-89)
3
(2) For property zoned RA, Rural Areas, or VR,
Village Residential, where such subdivision
contains only two lots and such private road
serves only the lots in such subdivision; and
is the sole and direct means of access to a
road in the state highway system; or
(AMENDED 1-21-88)
(3) Such subdivision is intended for
non-residential or non-agricultural purposes;
or
(4) Such subdivision is not located within a
rural area of the Comprehensive Plan and such
subdivision shall be into lots and/or units
to be occupied exclusively by residential
structures other than single-family detached
dwellings including appurtenant recreational
uses and open space; or
(5) Such subdivision constitutes a "family
division" as defined by ~18-56 of this
chapter.
Comment: In addition to a percentage differential, this
amendment would encourage a broader view of environmental
concerns (i.e. - The proposed Open Space Plan emphasizes
tree preservation under several circumstances). That is to
say a short road may qualify under the "30% rule", while a
much longer roadway involving significantly more volume of
disturbance may not qualify under the 30% rule. Obviously,
when more factors of consideration are introduced,
decision-making will become more complex and this is an
important concern. Examples are offered:
o Smith's analysis shows a 26%~difference in volume
of grading, an actual volume differential of 1,400
cubic yards, and removal differential of 100 v.
160 trees.
o Jones' analysis shows an 18% difference in volume
of grading, an actual volume differential of 6,500
cubic yards and a removal differential of 10 v. 18
trees.
Justification for approving a private road in one case and
denying a private road in another case may prove to be
dependent on the majority opinion as to the relative
importance of these secondary considerations. That is to
say, consistency in decision-making was a primary
consideration in incorporating the "30% rule" and
introducing other factors may result in less consistency.
4
I .
3. No change is proposed to ~18-36(c):
(c) In addition to the prOV1S1ons of ~ 18-36(b), the
commission may approve a subdivision served by one
or more private roads in any case in which the
subdivider, in accordance with ~ 18-36(h) of this
chapter, demonstrates to the reasonable
satisfaction of the commission that:
o For a specific, identifiable reason, the
general public interest, as opposed to the
proprietary interest of the subdivider, would
be better served by the construction of such
roads than by the construction of public
roads. In the case of any such approval, the
commission may require such assurances from
the subdivider in a form acceptable to the
county attorney as it may determine to be
necessary to protect the public interest with
respect to such roads.
Comment: While not employed extensively, this prOV1S1on has
proved to be a useful "safety valve" and has been applied J..n
measured fashion. Private roads were justified in the
Branchlands retirement community based on security of the
eld~rly residents. Several public purposes were cited in
the approval of private roads (to be constructed to VDOT
mountainous standards) in the Glenmore PUD.
4. Amend ~ 18-36(d) as follows:
(d) No subdivision shall be approved pursuant to ~
18-36(b) or ~ 18-36(c), unless and until the
commission shall determine that:
(1) Any such private road will be adequate to
carry the traffic volume which may be
reasonably expected to be generated by such
subdivision; and
(2) The comprehensive plan does not provide for a
public road in the approximate location of
such proposed private road; and
(3) The fee of such road is to be owned by the
owners of lots abutting the right-of-way
thereof or by an association composed of the
owners of all- lots in the subdivision,
subject in either case to any easement for
the benefit of all lots served by such road,
and
5
(4) Except where required by the commission to
serve a specific public purpose, such private
road shall not be designed to serve through
traffic nor to intersect the state highway
system in more than one location, and
(5) Any such private road has been approved in
accordance with ~ 30.3 FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY
DISTRICT of the Zoninq Ordinance and other
applicable law.
Comment: Issuance of a special use permit for a bridge or
other stream crossing in the floodplain is a legislative act
which should not be preceded (nor influenced) by
subdivision, a ministerial act. (This issue was not
discussed with the Private Road Committee, but has been
involved in recent floodplain reviews) .
5. Amend 9 18-36 (e) as follows:
(e) All private roads approved pursuant to this
section shall be constructed in accordance with
the following:
(1) Pr~va~e-reaa-~erm~~~ea-~ftaer-~-~a-~6-f~T-f~T
~fta%%-eeftferm-~e-~fte-re~~remeft~~-ef-~ab%e-%~
Pr~va~e-reaa~-~erm~~~ea-~ftder-~-~a-~6-fbT-f~T
sfta%%-eeftferm-~e-~fte-re~~~remeft~~-ef-~ab%e-%
e~ee~~-~fta~-a-m~ft~m~m-eBR-ef-s~~~raae-ef-~a
~fta%%-~e-re~~rea-afta-~fte-ae~~ft-ef-ba~eT
w~a~ft-ef-~raVe%WaYT-m~ft~m~m-~~~ft~-d~~~aftee
afta-~~rfaee-~rea~meft~-may-be-~fterea~ed-~ft
aeeeraaftee-w~~ft-~he-s~aftaaras-ef-~he-V~r~~ft~a
Be~ar~meft~-ef-H~~hways-afta-~rafts~er~a~~eft-fer
~fte-mes~-~raff~e-~ft~efts~ve-~~es-~e-wh~eft-~~eft
%afta-may-%awf~%%y-be-aeve~ea~--Pr~va~e-read~
~erm~~~ea-~ftaer-~-~a-~6-f~T-f4T-Sfta%%-eeftferm
~e-~fte-re~~reme~~s-er-~ah~e-~~.
(1) Private roads permitted under ~ 18-36 (b)
(1). 18-36 (b) (2). and 18-36 (b) (5) shall
conform to the requirements of Table A.
Private roads permitted under ~ 18-36 (b) (3)
and 18-36 (b) (4) shall conform to the
requirements of Table B except that a
pavement structure desiqn in accordance with
Virqinia Department of Transportation
Subdivision Street Requirements shall be
required for the most traffic-intensive uses
to which such land may be lawfully devoted
for a private road approved subiect to ~
18-36 (b) (3).
Except as otherwise expresslY provided.
6
private roads shall be designed to conform in
all regards to current Virginia Department of
Transportation Subdivision Street
Requirements. Private roads subject to Table
A shall be designed to conform to Virginia
Department of Transportation mountainous
terrain classification. Private roads
subject to Table B shall be designed to
conform to Virginia Department of
Transportation rolling terrain
classification.
Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to
preclude the commission from authorizing the
application of Virginia Department of
Transportation mountainous terrain design
standards to a private road subject to Table
B, upon finding that for a specific,
identifiable reason, the general public
interest as opposed to the proprietary
interest of the subdivider, would be better
served. In the case of any such approval,
the commission may require such assurances .
from the subdivider in a form acceptable to
the County Attorney as it may determine to be
necessary to protect the public interest.
(2) Exee~~-as-e~herwise-~re~iaea-ift-~a~ie-%%,-afty
sHeh-reaa-ser~ift~-mere-~haft-~i~e,-~H~-ft~~
mere-~haft-~weft~y,-ie~s-sftaii-ha~e-a
ri~h~-e~-way-wia~h-e~-~hir~y-~ee~-afta-a
maximHm-~raae-e~-fte~-mere-~ftaft-~i~~eeft
~ereeft~,-~re~iaea,-hewe~er-~ha~-~he-maximHm
~raae-e~-sHeh-reaa-may-~e-iftereasea-~e-fte~
mere-~haft-ei~h~eeft-~ereeft~-~er-ais~aftee-e~
fte~-mere-~haft-~hree-hHftarea-~ee~-where-ift-~he
e~iftieft-e~-~he-eeHft~y-eft~ifteer,-~e~e~ra~hie
~ea~~~es-;l:ls~~~y-s~eh-~fterease-ana-s~eft
~fterease-wiii-ne~-res~i~-ift-a-sa~e~y-ha~ard.
Except as otherwise expressly provided, a
private road approved pursuant to Table A,
serving fewer than six (6) lots shall have a
minimum right-of-way of thirty (30) feet and
all other private roads approved pursuant to
Table A or Table B shall have right-of-way
width conforming to the appropriate Virginia
Department of Transportation standard.
Virginia Department of Transportation
practice notwithstanding, only those areas
necessary to accommodate improvements and to
achieve required sight distance shall be
required to be cleared. Subsequent to
construction ornamental plantings and other
7
improvements may be installed provided the
same shall not conflict with sight distance,
drainage facilities or other requirements.
(3) Intersections of private roads shall have an
approach grade not exceeding four percent for
a distance of not less than forty feet in all
directions. Intersections of private and
public roads shall have an approach grade not
exceeding two percent for a distance of not
less than forty feet in all directions.
Approach grade distance shall be measured
from the edge of travelway of the road being
intersected.
f3t S~eei~iea~ienB-~er-erew~i~~,-ai~ehin~,-a~a
e~her-~re~iBie~B-~er-arai~a~e-Bhaii-~e
B~~;ee~-~e-a~~re~ai-e~-~he-ee~~~y-e~~i~eer~
f4t Exeel'~-aB-e~herwiBe-~re~iaea-i~-~a~ie-~~-a~a
S-i8-36-fet,-a~y-B~eft-reaa-Ber~i~~-mere-~fta~
~we~~y-ie~B-Bftaii-~e-ee~B~r~e~ea-i~
aeeeraa~ee-wi~h-~he-Vir~i~ia-Be~ar~me~~-e~
Hi~hwaYB-a~a-~ra~B~er~a~ieft,-iftei~aift~,-~~i
~e~-iimi~ea-~e,-fteri~eft~ai-aii~ftme~~,-miftim~
ri~ft~-e~-way-wia~ft-afta-maxim~-~raae~
(4) The developer shall submit to the county
engineer a map of the proposed subdivision
having contour intervals of not greater than
twenty feet showing the horizontal alignment
together with field-run profiles and typical
cross-section of such roads. The county
engineer may waive requirements of the
field-run profile in the case of an existing
road or where deemed appropriate due to
topography.
Comment: Amendments to ~18-36 (e) would achieve the primary
recommendation of the Private Roads Committee that the
Virginia Department of Transportation mountainous and
rolling terrain standards should be adopted as County
private road design standards. Generally, mountainous
standards would be available in the rural areas, while
rolling terrain standards would be applicable to urban
development.
provision is made to apply mountainous standards to urban
development and each case would be judged on its merits. It
is impossible to anticipate a body of circumstances
generally applicable, therefore, language from S 18-36 (c)
has been incorporated into S 18-36 (e) (1).
Note that, in accord with recommendations of the Private
8
Roads Committee, no change is made to current design
standards for a (rural) private road serving fewer than six
lots. The committee believed that the current "farm lane"
was appropriate and that Virginia Department of
Transportation standards would be excessive (based on
matters of density, aesthetics, etc.)
6. Maintain 18-36 (f), 18-36 (g), and 18-36 (h) as
currently written:
(f) Every such road shall be maintained in accordance
with the provisions of ~ 18-7 of this chapter.
Any lot fronting on any such ro~~shall enter only
onto such road and shall have n~ immediate access
onto any public street, except 1n such c~se in
which the subdivider in accordance with?~ ~
(h) of this caa~ter demonstrates to the reasonable
satisfaction ~~ flle commission that due to
existing development, topography, or otherv~
physical consideration as distinguished ~ a
special privilege or convenience, alternative
access would alleviate a clearly demonstrable
danger of significant degradation to the
environment of the site or adjacent properties.
(g) I.,The minimum right-of;way width requirements of
'JUl,Section ~ (e >>"~6twi thstanding, in the case of
a subdivision served by an existing easement of
fixed width, which easement cannot be widened by
the subdivider after documented good faith effort
by the subdivider to acquire additional
right-of-way width, the commission ma~A~~~~o~e ~
such subdivision in accordance wi th y~ (h) 0
upon demonstration by the applicant that such
easement is of adequate w~dth to accomm~ate such
travelway as required b~ ~ (e)~b~~her with
area adequate for maintenance of the same.
. ~ VY"
+hi <s 'Se c- ,
(h) A subdivide~requesting commission approval
pursuant tOl')\l-~ ~ (c) , ~ 1trJ8'"' (f), or S- 18 36
(g) of this c~~~shall file with the agent a
written request which shall state reasons and
justifications for such request together with such
alternatives as may be proposed by the subdivider.
Such request shall be submitted prior to
commission consideration by such date as may be
specified by the agent. No such request shall be
considered by the ,commission until the commission
has considered the recommendation of the agent.
The agent may recommend approval, approval with
9
conditions, or denial. A recommendation of
approval or conditional approval shall be
accompanied by a statement from the agent as to
public purpose served by such recommendation,
particularly in regard to the purpose and intent
of this chapter, the Zoning Ordinance, and the
Comprehensive Plan.
Comment: Recommendations of Private Roads Committee do not
occasion amendment to these provisions.
ZTA-91-06:
1. Amend Table 10.4 AREA AND BULK REGULATIONS:
Yards, minimum:
Front (existinq public road)
Front (internal public or
private road)
75
75
Side
Rear
25
25
35
25
25
35
Comment: This amendment would more than compensate for
increased right-of-way requirements. In addition, the
amE'mdment would offer:
greater flexibility in house site location
reduced construction costs
reduced number of variances from setback
requirements
less environmental/aesthetic degradation
10
EXISTING
Table I
Single-Family Detached Residential
(Also Agricultural/Commercial/Industrial)
:;:~:
SURFACE MINIMUM
TREATMENT SIGHT DISTANCE
?\E#~p~as'pth~t~i~~.:: '.)((I~.As~()rd@<:eWith...".",...
,. ' expreSs,lyprovided) , VDOT methodology for
, " '" ',' :', ",',' , ' stopping sight distance)
WIDTH OF
TRAVElWAY
\<lh..agditi(jrytqAf9pt?
.~H9liJg~r~.4@):fItdi)
:'.......:r~,(mif~T~h~).. "
DEPTH OF BASE
....,(YR9I&ggt~~t~.
,..".,',. ..B5's~}..H.::
............... .
. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.........................
........... .........
........."...... ,..
.................... '.-
......... .... ,".
. ............ .
Family Division Only
(Any number of lots)
See note **
See note ** See note **
See note **
2 Lots
See note **
See note ** See note **
See note **
3 - 5 Lots
14 Feet
Not required (unless
6" - #25 or #26 slope exceeds 7%)***
1 00 Feet
6 - 1 0 Lots
1 4 Feet
Prime & Double Seal or
6" - #21 or #21A Approved Equivalent
1 00 Feet
11 - 20 Lots
1 8 Feet
Prime & Double Seal or
6" - #21 or #21A Approved Equivalent
120 Feet
*NUMBER OF LOTS SERVED shall mean the aggregate of all lots served by such road segment and all lots having
access over such segment to a public roa~. ROAD SEGMENT shall mean each portion of a private road between its
intersection with other private or public roads (see illustration).
**The surveyor shall certify on the plat that the existing and/or proposed right-of-way is of adequate width and
horizontal and vertical alignment to accommodate a travelway passable by ordinary passenger vehicles in all but
temporary extreme weather conditions, together with area adequate for maintenance of such travelway. Such
certification may be accomplished by the following wording on the plat: "This private road will provide reasonable
access by motor vehicle as required by 918-36 of the Albemarle County Code." This provision includes family divisions,
***If slope exceeds seven percent, 6" of #21 or #2lA and prime & double seal are required..
ILLUSTRATION TO ACCOMPANY NOTE ONE:
A
B
D
I
\
C
IE
PUBLIC ROAD"
NUMBER OF LOTS SERVED:
Segment A = Lots on segment A
Segment C = Lots on Segments A, B, and C
Segment E = Lots on Segments A, B, C, D and E
Note: Any lot with frontage on more than one road segment shall be counted on each road segment on which such
lot fronts, unless access is specifically restricted by notation on the, final plat.
186
EXISTING
Table II
Residential Uses Other Than Single-Family Detached Dwellings
1. Right-of-Way Width
Travelway
Depth of Base
Surface Treatment
30 feet
24 feet
6 inches VDH&T
Aggregate Base
1121 or 1121A
1! inches S-5
Bituminous concrete
or Approved Equivalent
2. Horizontal and vertical curvature shall ?e subject to approval by County
Engineer in accordance with appropriate VDH&T standards.
3. The commission may require concrete curb and gutter and sidewalks or other
pedestrian ways in accordance with ~ 18-39(n).
4. The commission may require increased travelway width to provide for on-street
parking upon a determination that provisions for off-street parking may be
inadequate to reasonably preclude unauthorized on-street parking.
5. Minimum sight distance shall be provided in accordance with Table I.
6. Where vehicular traffic on such road is projected to exceed 250 vtpd, depth
of base and surface treatment shall be in accordance with Virginia Department
of Highways & Transportation standards. ,I
;;
(2) Except as otherwise provided in Table II, any such
road serving more than five, but not mor,e than
twenty, lots shall have a right-of-way width of
thirty feet and a maximum grade of not more than
fifteen percent, provided, however that the
maximum grade of such road may be increased to not
more than eighteen percent for distance of not
more than three hundred feet where in the opinion
of the county engineer, topographic features
j~stify such increase and such increase will not
result in a safety hazard.
Intersections of private roads shall have an
approach grade not exceeding four percent for a
distance of not less than forty feet in all
directions. Intersections of private and public
roads shall have an approach grade not exceeding
two percent for a distance of not less than forty
feet in all directions. Approach grade distance
shall be measured from the edge of travelway of
the road betng intersected.
(3) Specifications for crowning, ditching, and other
provisions for drainage shall be subject to
approval of the county engineer.
PR.OPOSED
Table A
Single-Family Detached Residential
(Also Agricultural)
NUMBER OF LOTS
SERVED BY ROAD WIDTH OF SURFACE MINIMUM
SEGMENT* TRAVELWAY DEPTH OF BASE TREATMENT SIGHT DISTANCE
::::::::::::::::::;:,::,:::::::::::::::~fq]~ggr~!,~::::(~9ip~:M9~lj~rw!~~::::(mi~~9m~ij~f::wm~,:r
Family Division Only
(Any number of lots)
See note **
See note **
See note * *
See note **
2 lots
See note **
See note **
See note **
See note **
3 - 5 lots
14 Feet (In addition to
4 foot shoulders and
ditch requirements)
6" - #25 or #26
Not required (unless
slope exceeds 7%)***
100 Feet
6 lots or More
Shall be designed to VDOT MOUNTAINOUS TERRAIN Standards
*NUMBER OF LOTS SERVED shall mean the aggregate of all lots served by such road segment and all lots having
access over such segment to a public road. ROAD SEGMENT shall mean each portion of a private road between its
intersection with other private or public roads (see illustration).
**The surveyor shall certify on the plat that the existing and/or proposed right-of-way is of adequate width and
horizontal and vertical alignment to accommodate a travelway passable by ordinary passenger vehicles in all but
temporary extreme weather conditions, together with area adequate for maintenance of such travelway. Such
certification may be accomplished by the following wording on the plat: "This private road will provide reasonable
access by motor vehicle as required by ~ 18-36 of the Albemarle County Code." This provision includes family divisions.
***If slope exceeds seven percent, 6" of #21 or #21A and prime & double seal are required..
ILLUSTRATION TO ACCOMPANY NOTE ONE:
An
B
C
D
IE
PUBUC ROAD
NUMBER OF LOTS SERVED: -
Segment A = Lots on segment A
Segment C = Lots on Segments A, B, and C
Segment E = Lots on Segments A, B, C, D and E
Note: Any lot with frontage on more than one road segment shall be counted on each road segment on which such
lot fronts, unless access is specifically restricted by notation on the final plat.
186
fI#
PROPOSED
..... ,;(
Table B,
Residential Uses Other Than Single-Family Detached Dwellings
(Also Commercial/lndustrial)
1. Shall be designed to VDOT ROlliNG TERRAIN Standards.
2. The Planning Commission may require concrete curb and gutter and sidewalks or other pedestrian ways in
accordance with Section 18-39(n).
3. The Planning Commission may require increased travelway width to provide for on-street parking upon a
determination that provisions for off-street parking may be inadequate to reasonably preclude unauthorized
on-street parking.
;::(1:' ~,.. v.e cf. I ( /3/9/
REPUBLIC CAPITAL CORPORATION
P.O. Box 7885
Charlottesville. Va. 22906
(804) 979-5748
FAX (g04) 979.0575
November 13, 1991
BY FAX
Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
Albemarle County Office Building
P.O. Box 911
Charlottesville. VA 22901
County Private Road Ordinance
To the Board of Supervisors:
As a member of the Private Roads) Work Committee. and as a member of
the local Task Force working with the Hi~wa~ Department in their revision of the
sUbdivision street requirements, and as a local home builder, I would like to
encourage the Board of Supervisors to keep the private roads' option intact as a part
of the zoning ordinance. The flexibilio/ of retaimng private road approvals in the
County would help counteract increasll1gly difficult requirements imposed by the
Highway Department, whose primary purpose is to make future roads as flat as
possible.
The changes recently implemented by the Highway Department in their
subdivision street requirements include reducing the radius of curves, reducing the
maximum slope of a grade, increasing the car trips' calculations; and other items
which have the net effect of increasing costs of tIle roads, increasing vehicle speeds
to rates substantially above the posted requirements. and reducingtlexibility to
accommodate changes in terrain. Part of our suggestions to the Highway
Department were to recognize that Albemarle COunty contains mountamous
terrain. flat roads can mar hilly topography, and higher speeds generally do not
make neighborhood roads safer.
As far as I know, recommendations of our group were completely ignored by
the Highway Department. The County-s private roads ordinance, therefore, is a
measure wliich would allow the Cod~ some flexibility in accommodating road
construction for some of the more . cult terrain that is a natural part of OUI area.
,Dv' 13 ) 91 09: 39 REP CRP 804-':f?9-k:):.?5
P.3
~.---;
I would appreciate if the Board would consider the need for flexibility, safety,
and cost in desigmng roads to match the geography by keeping private roads as part
of the ordinance.
Yours,
~ ~ fY\~'"
Blake Hurt
President
jmen
Distributed to Board: if - t "1/
Agenda Item ~J?T,4 ql, J/Odt, 'f gJ
't:T4Q/')/O),4:sf
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY or .t\LE::\"j\{\RLF
Dept of Planning & Community Developmenf',::~'\ 'I"::;'::''; r;:::-; r~~:' n ',', i-' ;';=.' r,\::~\
, \ ' 1" w........... .. '.'" .,... ,..,.. "'~""i "I i
401 McIntire Road Ill:' ).- ' '\ I; \ \
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 \~'l~ OCT :2:8 lS8l ~; ;~\
(804) 296-5823 \:. \ \ / ) " ~ I
U \\C:~;\~:'~~:',:.' ..;"'.;"'~~:-: :~:J
'F (i /\J<D (> C ,_,.' :)I~ S
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Harry Wilkerson
Phil Grimm
Jacquelyn Huckle
Blake Hurt
Mike West
Bob McKee
steve Key J
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and' LJJv
community Development
TO:
DATE:
October 24, 1991
RE:
Board of Supervisors Meeting - November 13, 1991
The Albemarle county Board of supervisors is conducting a
work session to discuss private roads on November 13, 1991.
This session is scheduled for 10:30 a.m., Meeting Room #7,
County Office Building. The Board has asked that members of
the Private Roads Committee attend this meeting to discuss
private road issues. The Board has raised a basic question
as to what extent private roads should continue to be
allowed. In particular, they have asked if private roads
are counterproductive to the County's Rural Area policies,
especially the clustering provisions. Please contact me at
296-5823 if you will be unable to attend this meeting or if
you have any questions regarding this matter.
r
VWC/jcw
~:
Lettie E. Neher
~~'lIja j'.!!" !'..,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
'" ,.' f~'::L- CJ I
':. ,c,,. ... '." . ;." ,... " " (/
,),:1(\'HI(..;(1 tv .~.,alf.. -. ..., ~-"
q 1...IJ!~,:'lf1
I..~,':, ',f,', 1 I" -"... I..
~ICi-J~):!U \.
1,'.:....\ 1". I"" '''''."
1. I' .; .....'IIi t
.'",......""."""...."'...,..",i...1
;'~,
NOV ;1 1981
MEMORANDUM
.:'; .'; r;'TT1"'f""::.rrro
. ,... .. I.. U ",j L__. '-=-' '
ni.:!\/V(381\fJ(\ ). c
, -- "",,' .. '.."
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
November 8, 1991
Annual Report of the Comprehensive Plan
Attached is the Summary of the Findings and Recommendations of the
Annual Report of the Comprehensive Plan for your review and
endorsement. Endorsement of the recommendations will allow staff
to integrate these initiatives in their budget and work plans for
FY 92-93.
Copies of the entire Annual Report will be provided at the Board
meeting. Other than this Summary, the full report also includes an
update of data, a status report on the Strategies and Action
Agenda, and approved amendments to the plan.
RWT,Jr/RBB/dbm
91.197
Attachment
ANNUAL REPORT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Summary of Findings and Recommendations
Summary of Findinqs:
The following is a summary of significant new information
and findings from the analysis undertaken for this report:
Population Trends: The 1990 population for Albemarle
County has increased to 68,040 from 55,783 in 1980.
The average annual growth rate between 1980 and 1990
was 2.0 percent. The average annual growth rate for
the County between 1970 and 1980 was 4.8 percent.
There is a continuing decline in the percentage of
households earning less than $15,000 and a consistent
increase in households earning more than $40,000 a year
(based on adjusted gross income class). In 1988, 34
percent of the total population made less than $15,000.
Conversely, the percentage making over $40,000 in 1988
was 27.9 percent. To some extent, this reflects
inflationary increases in income over the decade. But,
this trend may also indicate that individuals and
families with lower incomes are leaving as they can no
longer afford the cost of living in the County.
Median family income for Albemarle County in 1990 is
$42,076, seven percent above the state median income
($39,175). The County's median income is highest in
the region (Charlottesville $37,578, Greene $36,797,
Fluvanna $33,285 and Nelson $30,045).
Housing Cost: Based on the 1990 preliminary census
information, the median value of owner-occupied housing
in Albemarle is $111,200, 22 percent above the State
median value ($91,000). The County median value is the
highest in the region (Charlottesville $85,600,
Fluvanna $75,100, Greene $73,700, and Nelson $53,100).
Economy: Retail trade, finance, and service sectors of
the economy are showing the highest level of employment
growth in the County, and are growing faster than
previous projections. Manufacturing and wholesale
trade have not shown significant growth. Current
national projections from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics indicate that these trends will likely
continue through the 1990's. Listed below are the
Bureau of Labor statistics' moderate national
projections for major employment sectors. These are
annual growth rates for the period between 1990 and
2000:
Manufacturing
Transportation
Wholesale Trade
Construction
1.2%
1.2%
Finance
Services
Retail Trade
1.3%
2.5%
1.5%
-.1%
8~
. 0
Analysis of the local/regional economy may indicate
different trends.
Agricultural Trends: The number of farms in the County
have decreased from 830 in 1982 to 722 in'1987,
according to the 1987 Census of Agriculture. This
reflects a sharp decline from the trend established
over the previous 13 years (750 farms in 1974, 751
farms in 1978 and 830 farms in 1982). Land in farms
continue a declining trend from 208,476 acres in 1978
to 201,465 acres in 1982, and 186,486 in 1987. Total
farm products sold also show a decline in 1987 from
previous years based on current dollar value and
adjusted dollars. The total products sold totalled
$19,072,000 in 1987, compared to $21,892,000 in 1982
(in adjusted dollars, 1987 = $16,788,732; 1982 =
$22,686,010).
Growth Management/Development Activity: According to
building permit activity for the last five years, the
Growth Areas have captured an average of over 55% of
all new residential development in the County. In
1989, the Growth Areas received over 73% of all new
residential development.
Hollymead has received a higher percentage of growth in
the last two years due primarily to development of
Forest Lakes. (23% of total growth in 1989, and 12% in
1990). However, other Communities and Villages are not
capturing a significant portion of new development.
The Rural Areas have received, on average, 45% of the
residential development over the last five years. The
high mark for both total units and percentage of growth
in the Rural Areas was 1987, with 427 new dwellings or
65% of the total for all new units in the County. The
three subsequent years have shown a decline in total
units from 395 in 1988 to 347 in 1989 and 335 units in
1990. The percentage of total units was 59% in 1988,
27% in 1989, and 42% in 1990.
The basis for implementing the Growth Management Policy
is the Land Use Plan and its goal to direct growth into
Designated Growth Areas. The above information
indicates that the trend is toward a somewhat greater
proportion of new development locating in the Growth
Areas. However, a significant portion of new
development is continuing to locate in the Rural Area.
Development in the Growth Areas is occurring
exclusively in the Urban Area and Hollymead.
Growth Areas are not capturing a significant
development.
almost
The other
amount of
Land Use Inventory: There has been a significant
reduction in the inventory of undeveloped land
designated for high density residential use. A total
of 84 acres were developed between 1988-91. The
Agnor-Hurt School site, The Ridge Development, and
University Village have utilized large areas of high
density land in Neighborhoods 1, 5, and 7 respectively.
Approximately 240 acres of low density land was also
developed during this period, leaving a total of 3,961
developable acres. A large portion of low density land
currently has limited development potential due to lack
of road access or availability/proximity of utilities,
particularly in Crozet and scottsville. Due to a
relatively limited amount of land available, land costs
have risen rapidly in the Urban Areas and Communities.
This ultimately contributes to the increasing cost of
housing.
Based on the guidelines outlined in the Plan for
designating non-residential lands, the total available
area designated for commercial service use
(Neighborhood, Community and Regional Service) now
falls below the anticipated minimum needed by the year
2010. By 2010, there will be a need for 53 additional
acres of commercial land not now designated in the
Plan. This assessment does not include consideration
of the commercial development potential of the
Office Service and Office/Regional Service
designations. There are over 340 acres so designated
which can accommodate some portion of the anticipated
commercial demand. Office/employment center activities
are intended to be the primary uses in the Office
Service, and Office/Regional Service designations.
Commercial development is intended to be a secondary or
supporting use. There does not appear to be a need for
additional commercial lands in the short-term,
particularly given current economic conditions.
The current inventory of developable industrial land is
still well in excess of anticipated need. Over four
times the anticipated land area needed by 2010 is
designated in the Land Use Plan.
Plan Implementation: There have been four major
ordinance or code changes which have implemented
recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan.
1. Rural Preservation Development option of RA
District Zoning Regulations - This ordinance
provision implemented the recommendations of the
Plan to provide a method of clustering small lots
while preserving large tracts of land which would
be more appropriate for rural uses.
2. Entrance Corridor Overlay District - This district
was adopted to protect the visual quality of major
entrance roads into the County. The roads
designated as entrance corridor routes are: Route
29, Route 250, Route 29/250 Bypass, Route 29
Business, 1-64, Route 20 North, Route 22, Route
231, Route 6, Route 151, Route 631 (from Route 708
to City limits), Route 53, Route 240, Route 654,
and Route 742.
3. The Non-Residential Service Areas - The Zoning
Ordinance was amended to permit non-residential
"service areas" as recommended in the
Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the amendment
is to permit the establishment of mixed use
developments consisting of commercial, industrial,
residential, and/or public land uses in a manner
consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The Water Resource Protection Areas Ordinance of
the County Code - This ordinance implemented the
Plan's overall goal to protect the County's
surface water resources and the specific objective
to review and support the Chesapeake Bay
protection initiatives. It provides water quality
protection measures along all rivers and perennial
streams.
Action Agenda:
Below is the prioritized list of activities recommended in
the Plan to be undertaken and the status of these projects.
1. Public Facilities Plan - The Community Facilities
Plan was adopted in June, 1991 as an amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Open Space and critical Resources Plan - A draft
of this Plan is complete and has been reviewed by
the Planning Commission. Adoption is anticipated
by the winter of 1991.
3. Criteria Based Ratinq System and Transportation
Plan - A criteria based rating system for
evaluating and prioritizing road improvement
projects has been developed and used in reviewing
the six Year Secondary Road Plan in 1990 and 1991.
4. Water Resources Committee and Water Resources
Protection Measures - The Committee has been
established and has begun an evaluation of various
resource protection measures and other water
resource related issues. They have reviewed and
made recommendations on the Water Resource
Protection Areas Ordinance, Runoff Control
Ordinance changes, and Stormwater Management
issues.
5. utilities Master Plan - Work is underway on this
plan. A staff committee including representatives
from the Albemarle County Service Authority and
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority has been formed to
assist in the development of this plan. A draft
Plan is anticipated to be completed by Summer,
1992.
6. Urban Drainaqe Plan Update - There has been no
work on this project to date. There is a request
in the Capital Improvements Program (for FY92-93)
to fund a County wide drainage study.
7. Aqricultural/Forestal Resources Advisorv Committee
- There has been no work on establishing this
committee to date.
8. Housinq Committee The Committee was appointed in
February of 1991. A draft report from the
Committee for the development of a housing
strategy is anticipated by early 1992.
9. Historic Preservation Committee - There has been
no work on establishing this committee to date. An
unofficial committee consisting of members of
citizens for Albemarle is developing a draft
historic district ordinance to present to the
County.
10. Social Data Base - A social data base has not been
developed to date.
11. Urban Street Corridor Desiqn Plans - The Entrance
Corridor Overlay District has been adopted. An
Architectural Review Board (ARB) has been
established to enforce these provisions. The ARB
has developed interim design guidelines for the
Entrance Corridor routes.
12. criteria for qualifying scenic Roads and Streams -
Proposed criteria for qualifying scenic streams
have been developed as part of the Open Space
Plan. There has been no work on Scenic Roads
criteria to date.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
13. Annual "status of the Plan" Report - This is the
first report since adoption of the Comprehensive
Plan. Subsequent reports will be issued annually.
Recommendations:
The following are recommendations for further action to be
undertaken:
1. The County should conduct a fiscal impact analysis to
determine how development and population trends and
projections will affect revenues and expenditures of
the County. This analysis should be conducted at two
levels: (1) based on existing growth areas as defined
in the Comprehensive Plan; and, (2) based on expansion
of growth areas to accommodate additional land use
needs as noted in this report.
This analysis has been recommended for several years.
The analysis and ultimate development of a fiscal
impact model is an important step in the process for
evaluating how the County will support future growth in
an effective manner. A fiscal impact analysis should
be considered a high priority and begin in FY91-92.
2. The County should also establish a systematic annual
review of the County's fiscal condition as recommended
in the Comprehensive Plan (p. 222). This ongoing
assessment would provide a method to monitor various
financial indicators and identify any warning trends
which could adversely affect the County's financial
condition. This system should be established in
FY91-92.
3. Upon completion of a fiscal impact analysis, the staff
should evaluate growth area expansion to accommodate
land use needs. Various locations for growth area
expansion should be considered, but particular emphasis
should be given to re-evaluating the Hollymead
Community/Piney Mountain Village area for expansion
potential.
Based on a Board of Supervisors directive at the time
of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the Hollymead
Community was evaluated in 1989 for possible expansion.
It was determined that expansion of Hollymead was not
appropriate at that time due to a number of outstanding
issues or additional planning work that needed to be
resolved or completed. These issues/activities
include:
1. Development of a Community Facilities Plan;
2. Development of a County Open Space Plan;
3. Development of a fiscal impact model and
analysis of the County to determine impact of
growth on the County;
4. Resolution of the Route 29 Bypass location;
5. Resolution of the Meadow Creek Parkway;
with the exception of the fiscal impact model/analysis
all other items have either been addressed or will be
under study this fiscal year. Therefore, upon
completion of the fiscal impact model, Hollymead should
be re-evaluated for potential expansion. It is
anticipated that this analysis could being in FY92-93.
4. Develop "Neighborhood Plans" for the Designated Growth
Areas. It is recommended that Neighborhood Plans be
developed for each of the designated Growth Areas.
These plans would provide a more detailed analysis of
need, and a plan for the development of these areas.
It would also provide an opportunity for the residents
of these areas to become more involved in the planning
process for their neighborhood. The following is the
recommended priority for undertaking these plans. Work
would begin in FY91-92 on priority #1.
1. Urban Area Neighborhood 3
2. Urban Area Neighborhoods 4 and 5
3. Hollymead/Piney Mountain
4. Crozet
5. Neighborhoods 1 and 2
6. Neighborhoods 6 and 7
7. Remaining Villages (North Garden,
Earlysville, Rivanna)
5. Conduct an economic base analysis of the local economy.
The most recent base analysis of the local economy is
now seven years old. A new study should be undertaken
by FY92-93 so this information will be available for
the next review of the Comprehensive Plan.
6. It is recommended that the following items from the
Action Agenda be pursued in FY92-93.
o Urban Drainaqe Plan Update - This plan would
analyze drainage needs in the urbanizing areas of
the County. A Capital Improvements Program (CIP)
request to fund this Plan in FY92-93 has been
submitted. The CIP is currently under review and
is expected to be adopted in December, 1991.
o Aqricultural/Forestal Resources Advisory Committee
- Due to the continuing decline of agricultural
activities in the County as indicated in the 1987
Census of Agriculture it is recommended that the
Agricultural/Forestal Resources Advisory Committee
be established to address agricultural and
forestal industry needs and develop and recommend
programs to support the industry.
7. The only remaining Action Agenda item which has not
either been completed or scheduled for completion is
the development of a social data base. This project
should be undertaken when a thorough analysis of the
1990 Census information is completed. Census data will
be available on a flow-basis beginning in the
fall/winter of 1991 and continuing through 1992.
,"
~.,
Citi~ens fnr Albemarle, Inc.
Box 3751 University Station
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
1
!
\
~
statement to the Board of Supervisors
~
Re: 1991 Annual Report of the Comprehensive Plan
Mr. Chairman and members of the Board:
We would like to begin by commending the staff of the Department
of Planning and Community Development for preparing this valuable
document.
We were particularly struck by two observations made by the report:
First, it is very disturbing that individuals and families with
lower incomes are forced to leave Albemarle County because they can
no longer afford the cost of living here. This trend calls for
immediate action to ensure that qualified residents can find
affordable housing. We look forward to reading the final report
of the Housing Advisory Committee, and especially to their
recommendations.
Second, the report confirms, once again, that our Rural Areas are,
absorbing far more of the county's growth than anticipated in the
Comprehensive Plan. The admirable goal in the 1982 Comprehensive
Plan of limiting growth in Rural Areas to only 13% has never been
reached; over the last five years 45% of residential development
has occurred on land not designated for growth.
This pattern is related to a number of other troubling observations
of the report. For example, the area of farm land and the number
of farms has declined significantly (p. 2). If our agricultural
base diminishes much further, we will lose essential farm support
services -- feed stores, tractor repair facilities -- and the
remaining working farms cannot be sustained. This, of course, would
increasingly erode the rural character which makes the county
att~ive to both residents and tourists.
.;/ '''...,
;the rep;~t.also points out that voluntary techniques to preserve
/ rural land '-are not being actively promoted (p. 27) , that
! preparation of"the Master utilities Plan is moving slowly (p. 63),
; and that population pressure forces consideration of expanding
Growth Areas into a~~as now earmarked "rural".
r
\ The message that em~ges from reading this report is that growth
\ is overtaking the/ Comprehensive Plan's good intentions about how
\ to maintain th~ ,.' quali ty of life in the county. To us, this
\ suggests that ,we must strengthen rural zoning patterns, adjust the
ce/l'ax to serve its purpose more effectively, and
."
'f
aggressively promote voluntary conservation measures. We need to
get moving on the "fiscal impact analysis" proposed in the CompPlan
(p. 5), and to consider innovative new measures to influence the
location of development such as density transfers and
authorization for TORs.
Though the current recession has given Albemarle County a brief
respite from growth pressures, we can soon expect a return of the
pattern of rapid growth. [see CfA population growth chart] There
is no reason to expect the trend in the past twenty years to change
in the near future.
The truth is that growth pressure in our rural areas is eroding our
quality of life, and that current efforts to manage growth are not
sufficient.
This, we believe, is the most important lesson we can learn from
this document.
with reference to the CompPlan's action agenda, we look forward to
timely consideration of the draft Historic Preservation Ordinance
which CfA has almost completed, and to the approval of a Mountain
Protection Ordinance in conjunction with the Open Space Plan. We
also hope the CompPlan's call for the establishment of an
Agricultural/Forestal Resources Advisory Committee will soon be
heeded.
Finally, we applaud the passage of the Water Resource Protection
Areas Ordinance, the creation of the Entrance Corridor Overlay
District, and the drafting and initial review of the Open Space
Plan.
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Planning Commission
David B. Benish~~Chief of Community Development
August 20, 1991
Status Report of the Comprehensive Plan
The status Report of the Comprehensive Plan will be
delivered to the Commission members later this week. Staff
will provide a general overview of the report at the August
27th Commission meeting. The Commission may wish to
schedule additional time at a subsequent meeting to further
discuss the report.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
DBB/mem
DATE
i
lj~c
I
1/ 02
AGENDA ITEM NAME
Q/./2f1,RoV
('I OV t/lCtVl f l~' tLu.. dl 0 { (~c4.
1>6 fhj Jct'l 22 ~ 2
AGENDA ITEM NO.
DEFERRED UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86
. ," ',' Ll-~jl(
, . I' . ,., .~. ',', ~., J_.~__
",..'.j"l' ......" \v 00410,
VI)' , "....~ C". ~P1--
A" 1'" '1+"1'1I No, Wli3~~ ~JI...
"l!\elll.. ",
ALBEMARLE - CHARLOTTESVILLE
OFFICE OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
401 MciNTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901.4596
(804) 296-5841
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM:
J. w. Peyton Robertson, Jr., Water Resources Manager
November 6, 1991 ~~
status of stormwater Report Recommendations
DATE:
RE:
The Board was presented a report from the Water Resources
Committee at the August 14 meeting which outlined a number of
recommendations for improving stormwater management in
Albemarle County. The Board requested a status report on the
implementation of the those recommendations in 90 days.
The attached materials outline a comprehensive stormwater
management strategy. The first attachment translates the
recommendations of the Stormwater Report into program elements
necessary to develop a Stormwater Management Master Plan. The
STUDY/ASSESSMENT element is critical to moving forward with the
rest of the program. CIP funds dedicated to this effort should
be preserved. Other funding mechanisms (such as the stormwater
utility) may eventually provide an additional revenue source to
implement the program.
The second attachment identifies the status of each of
these program elements and projects a timeline for completion
of tasks. Availability of resources will determine actual
completion, depending on identified priorities in the Capital
Improvements Program and other demands on staff. Changes in
the status of regulations may impose additional time
constraints on completion of a given element.
Albemarle County should continue to move ahead in
developing a comprehensive stormwater program. Experience from
other localities indicates that this issue will continue to
grow in importance. Opportunities for cooperation with the
City of Charlottesville and the University of Virginia are
being explored as a means of defraying program costs.
ws91-176
~
~
~
~
~
o
u
~
~
;::l
o
~
~
~
~
CI)
z
o
1--4
~
~
~
:E
a
u
~
~
E-t
~
o
p..
~
~
~
~
E-t
<
~
~
o
E-t
CI:l
~
~
E-t
E-t
~
o
0::
CI)
I j
o .g
.g '" I-<
"'C t:l..
Q) ] Q)
~ '" >
..2 ~o
... .S ~ '"
.~ '" ~ ~
I Q) ~ 0
.0'0 - ....
013 ;.:: ~ ..2
&0:-:=
o .... '60 ~
.o5~2
t:l.. El t:l.. '0
g.~ei::
o ~ ~
:;;c.s]U
d El c.s ....
.Sl '" 0
'" 8 .:2 .0
0> ~ .~ ._
o 0 :-:= U
I-< '" 0 "'C
t:l..~..sd
2 I-< ~ ~
c.s 2 c.s c.s
~ ; .~ >:
I-< Q) .= ::>
o .... ... .s
u; ~ 0'"
"'C ;.:: 0 ~
55ld~
a d Q) I-<
<8.s~
000 0
~
~
E-t
d
Z
o
.....:l
a
~
I-<
2
'"
'" c.s
El ::s
c.s ....
I-< d
gf Q)
I-< a
t:l..~
-; c.s
] a
I-< ::s
.5 2
o c.s
'0 ~
'" I-<
~ ,g
61JCI)
o c.s
I-<
t:l..g.
~-
o ~
~ Q)
E-<O
o 0
Attachment 1
~ II
1--4 1 II
~ II
~ II
~ Z II
.... ... II
~ OJ) 0 II
0 .S a
-- Q) II
CI) '0' ] ~ El II
E-td:; II
U ~ '" ~ t:l...~ II
~ Q) .:2 '" 0 d II
.<;: '" _ c.s II
...... ... I-< Q) Q) ..d
0 > .Sl '" > 0 II
Q) '" Q) Q) II
~ ~ I-<
Il. <O::S II
p.. I I I II
II
V
CI)
ffi
~
~ Q).~ ~ '8
l--4"'g.... .. d
~ .:2 ~ ~ '0 Q) 8
CI .~ ;a 0 '" 0
~ '0 I-< I-< d d
......Il.oll. oc.s
~.... Q) Q) .;;; .S
~ 0 8 ~ g ';> "E
U~d5~80
Z ... 0 '" '.. Il. d
< ~ U ~ "E Q) .Sl
Z ;.:: l:::: I-< 0 ';f.~
~ 0 0 Q) '" d ,:::
~ '" 13 .... c.s ';;i "'C
Q~~~~o.g
~uo < CI)
o 1 0 0
~
~
:E
CI)
CI)....
~ 0
~ci
< .....; '"
__ Oc-g
>- .S ..d
Q t:l.. '"
~ g. 2
E-t ::s c.s
CI) 1 ~
'"
.:2
....
;.::
.... ...
o 0
o..s
,g ~
5 ~
> ...
..s ~
"'C
I
)
;a
Q)
CI)
~ Q)
o
,od.. d
'" ~
o ;a
I-< I-<
~ 0
o
<Ii
OJ)
~
'"
~)
8 ~
t:l.. ~
- c.s
g ::s
- I-<
I-< 2
Q) c.s
..s ~
o
OJ) El
d I-<
:a ,g
o CI) 0
~ ..; Il.
E-<>Z
I I I
..s
.~
~
...
~
;a
I-<
8
U
I
z
<(
-.J
0..
a:
ill
r-
(f)
<(
~
r-
z
ill
~
ill
(!J
<(
z
<(
~
a:
ill
r-
<(
S
~
a:
o
r-
(f)
^
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
>c
~
z
~
o
u
~~
~~
t:Q ~
~ .~
Z 8.
~~
~4-<
z~
~ ~
~~
~~
~...
<:
~ ~
~~
...
~~
~
~
~
o
~
en
C")
0>
r.il C\/
~ 0>
(t
r.il C\/
0>
~ otl
1-4 .S
E-c a; ~
(t 0
tI)
=:>
E-c
~
tI)
.S
. sg -= CI)
O~.5..9
l:l 0..""" l:l
6 CI) 1;l .....
t) .~ 8 ~
CI) ~ t) 0
..9 CI) <<l ..cl
-= l:l .... :
o S .2 .....
~,.g .~ ~
o l:l ,g ....
.fl .!2 CI) .2
'" -; ..9 otl
~ ~ CI) .S
.... .... "0 "0
<<l .2 'S: S
~.s e ~
~ CI) 0..
..... := == :;;
<<l 0....... "0
~s~.E!
"0 8 8 '"
~ 0 ''::: ~
...=.....==
'C .S S .S
o otl .... <<l
'C q,) .2 ....
o..,.c l:l "l:l
fIj :::: ..... :0
~ .~ ~ Cii
otl otl,g S
.S .S <
.... ....
~ ~ ..
.5 .5 ~
otl otl 0
~~Z
]~
CI)
~ ~
<<l CI)
.S S .....
"0 ::I ~
.... (,) ~
o .g S
.~ ~ 8
'" ..... "l:l
:~ i '0
]Q)~
::I t) .~
~ .~ <<l
'<=l "0 otl
'0 ts .il
..... .... <<l
::10 ~ .S
<<l "0
l:l ~ ....
~ "0 8
.5 ~ t)
q,) .g .~
.J:J ...... ....
>. '0 CI)
<<l '" otl
S l:l ~
o <<l
sg ~ ~
00'"
:~ .w Q)
:> .S ~
e ~ 6
0....... '"
~f!~
~ fr ....
..... 0 ~
f! t) <<l
o .S ~
"0
CI) CI) CI)
..9 8 ats
~ '.:::.;; e. CI)
- <<ls '" ::I
~ ~.... ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 8 ~ r.S 8-
'S: ~ e .;:l e..8 >.
CI) .~ 0.. 8 0.. CI) .E
.... :c ~ "0 ....
~.5-~ ;<<l~
..8 ~,,~ j .; ~ ."'....8 ~
>'''''''<=l''Ol:lUl:lCl)
~ .~ ib ~ ~ CI) ,g s
~ ~ 6 's 8...9 ~ ~
....<<l.flB~~e~
~'" Cl)t)Ootlotl
<<l .~ ~ "0 ~ .fl .S -;
~ 'g !E ..8 ,., CI) ~ .Q .;
t) ..... l:l ...... ..... ...... r:l 0..
CI)....CI)......~~l.S....CI)
'0' ~ :Q .~ (/) ;.:: CI) .E g
l::';l:l",(/)<<l:>00
-.... CI)"l:l~ :>..:::..... t)
.....Q)q,)CI)(/)<<l<<lo~
~ S ,.c CI) (/) CI) e .....
s.....CI)l:l<aCl)~s
CI) a:> otl-. "'.=:~::>
:> o..,g .S >- CI) < otl
o CI) "0 0 = 0....
.... 1"\ "'!:l ....^.... CI)
0.. ~ ~ ..e ::> CI) v, 0.. =
.s S ~ -; t; ~ .~ .~ s~
CI) ..... otl l:l CI) otl -= ..... ....
~ ~ l:l .!2 ..9 S ,.c t) 0
.5 .5 :a .-::: e .~ '5 f! ~
f! ~ S :g 0 .>( 8 ;, CI)
O~~<..:::~ t),.C..9
<<l ~
u
~
'" M
0..0\
~N
0..0\
E-c ;
ffi ~. CI) CI) .~.
i g g
<<l <<l S
~ .~.. '" .S .S
CI) "0 "0 I '"
~ ~ ~ .... .... . . 'j:l
..~... ~ .. CI) 0 0 CI) ,g
..~.. '0 '" g ~ '"
~ 0' CI) '" l:l .~ ~
r.il '" .8 <<l
.... :~ .!2 ..... '"
~ CI) ..~. CI) .S 'C "0 ~
.... '"
~ ~ <<l otl . .. '0 "0 < 'S: "0 ~, .!2 CI)
~ '" .... .... H CI) otl
-<: ~ 0 .... z
.S ~.. .; ~ 0 ~ l:l
..... ..... ..~... 'g
...... 0 <<l 0 '0 0 ..... otl
>H .... 0 .... '0
"0 l:l ~ t) .S
..~. A 11 .~ (/) l:l CI) ~
.. . ..... 8 '0' "0
0 ,.; I l:l at s .....
~ ..... CI) 0 .... ~
~ 0 ~ U ~ ~ U ..~... ~ ~
otl g.
~ l:l S ...... :t: .... .8 (/) ~ '"
'0. ~,. 0 j ~ '" ......
~ ~ '" ~ , , ..... CI) CI)
0.. l:l '" '" :> '" :>
<<l oS 0 ~ .... ~ '" CI)
~ U 0 ~ < 0
Attachment 2
'"
~ .~
.....
.... .... '0
.2 S .8 2
e<:l
C ..8 >. otl
'3
S < ~ 0.. S
e Q.
.g e<:l 0
e e<:l .... ....
l:l .... ] ..::- Q. N
e<:l otl
S e<:l ..... >.
0 t) ~ 0\
.... '" e<:l
..... otl .... is e 0\
0 0.. .... ......
0 ....
l:l .... e<:l ::I < ....
0.. -= t) cl)
cl) otl ~ ,.c
.... ] .S ] ..... ~ e
e<:l g
'" 0.. g. CI)
l:l 0 '0 0 d :>
G) 0
.!2 "0 ~ "0 .!2 Z
..... <<l :> e
~ cl) -; .....
l:l "0 ~ '"
::I o:l l:l o:l e<:l
.... ::I
otl CI) .5 .!2 otl Q. >.
cl) :> ..... 0 0 ;:::
~ e<:l '" '" .... 0..
..cl l:l Z 0.. o:l
..... 0 8 cl)
l:l ..... ''::: CI) ""' '"
CI) 0 (/)
e l:l e<:l ..g ~ 0 e<:l
cl) 0 ~ .... 0 0 '"
o:l
otl "0 CI) cl) ~ 0 cl)
e<:l ] ...... ....
..... .... Z
l:l e<:l l:l '"
e<:l ..g ~ ...... <<l cl)
~ .5 '" S ..g '"
!l l:l cl)
.... (/) 0 ~ '" ..g
~ ~ .... ''::: '" '"
<<l cl) ~ >. ~ ....
~ :Q (/) .2
e ::I '"
e '" otl l:l CI) '"
cl) l:l CI) 0 ..... l:l
.... 0 .....
.8 :> .... ..... S .!2
t) .....
~ -; e<:l
(/) "0 l:l 0 .....
.... :~ (,) '"
B -; '3 cl) '3
.5 t) ] ~ -g otl
..9 ~ CI)
(/) '" ~ o:l ....
~
I
Q
~ <Ii
0 otl
cl) <Ii
~.. ~ otl
.... CI)
cl) ~
.~. .....
o:l (/)
~ ~
.Ci).. 0
.~.. .... ~
.8 Z
(/) <
.,j ~
> ~
D\~t' r'lb' "+ed' to i:\f'~ reI, Jr. C; {9 (
'oJ;"a1. ...I-..Iu U, ~~.l
Ap,enda Item No. '1 /. O~ (</. Y' /p f
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. , County Executive
DATE: July 11, 1991
RE: Stormwater Management Report
Attached is the Stormwater Management Report prepared by the
Water Resources Committee during the spring of this year. I
requested the Planning Commission to review the report which was
completed earlier this summer. During their review several
members of the Commission have indicated their desire to serve as
a subcommittee of the Planning Commission to work with the Water
Resources Committee in the implementation of the recommendations
in the report.
While many of these recommendations will require further
action by the Board, staff recommends your acceptance of the
report and that you request the Water Resources Committee and a
subcommittee appointed by the chairman of the Planning Commission
to work jointly in developing the provisions and tools necessary
to implement the short and long term aspects of the report.
Should you have any questions concerning the report, please
feel free to contact Mr. Robertson or me.
RWTJR/bat
91-1.84
Attachment
ALBEMARLE - CHARLOTTESVILLE
OFFICE OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
401 MCiNTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901-4596
(8041 296-5841
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
FROM:
J. W. Peyton RObert~~., Water Resources Manager
April 26, 1991 ~~ ~
DATE:
RE:
stormwater Management
As chairman of the Water Resources Committee, I am
forwarding to you the attached Special Report on Stormwater
Management in Albemarle County. The committee has spent
several meetings discussing the issue of stormwater management
and has produced the report as a summary of its findings. The
committee includes the following representation:
J. W. Peyton Robertson, Jr., Watershed Management Official
Office of Watershed Management
V. Wayne Ci1imberg, Director
Planning and Community Development
Richard Moring, Director
Engineering Department
J. Gordon Yager, District Conservationist
Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District
George W. Williams, Executive Director
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
The Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of
Soil and Water Conservation has reviewed Albemarle County's
water resources management policies to determine whether or not
the county has a "local program" as described in the recently
issued State Stormwater Management Regulations. The State has
determined that Albemarle does not have a local program and has
further determined that no local government in Virginia
currently has the elements of a complete program. This will
allow for a "bottom up" approach in building stormwater
management programs across the state.
Even though the State has made this determination, the
Water Resources Committee feels strongly that stormwater
management represents an important policy issue that should be
discussed by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.
ws91-34
Attachment
"
SPECIAL REPORT ON STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY
The Comprehensive Plan calls for the Water Resources
Committee to address specific water resource questions and
concerns. The Water Resources Committee has identified
stormwater management as a major policy issue. In response
both to periodic flooding and drainage problems in the urban
area of the County and state and federal stormwater management
regulatory activity, the Water Resources Committee has
undertaken a review of local stormwater management policies.
This review has included an analysis of existing programs to
address stormwater and some preliminary analysis of impending
changes to state and federal regulations. The committee has
identified several issues for your consideration:
Short Term:
o Jurisdictional Issues
Geographic scope of the stormwater provisions of the
subdivision ordinance
- Overlap of programs to address runoff control, erosion
and sediment control, and stormwater (see Figure 1)
o Scope of the Problem
- Lack of a comprehensive inventory of existing drainage
facilities
- Limited effectiveness of existing programs
- Fragmented administration and enforcement
Lonq Term:
o Financing
- Limited CIP funds and alternative financing mechanisms
to address remedial projects
o comprehensive Stormwater Management
- Need to develop regional strategy to address stormwater
- Need to retain a special emphasis on drinking water
supply protection (runoff control)
o State and Federal Regulation
- Increasing emphasis on water quality as well as quantity
- Inspection and monitoring
SHORT TERM:
Short term problems revolve primarily around the current
drainage provisions of the subdivision ordinance which specify
a geographic area in which they apply. These boundaries relate
to drainage basins in the urban area surrounding
Charlottesville but do not correlate with those areas intended
for development (growth areas) as identified in the current
,
stormwater Report, page 2
comprehensive plan. Development is occurring outside these
defined drainage areas (example: Pantops Mountain) which does
not fall under existing requirements.
Lack of understanding on the part of the public has lead
to confusion in determining what stormwater requirements apply
for a given location. The runoff control ordinance applies
within the watersheds of public drinking water impoundments,
the erosion and sediment control ordinance applies county-wide,
and the drainage provisions of the subdivision ordinance apply
to "the drainage basins of Moores Creek, Meadow Creek, Powell
Creek, Redbud Creek, Town Branch and those unnamed branches,
whether perennial or intermittent, which flow directly into the
Rivanna River from either Fork of the Rivanna and thence
downstream with the Rivanna to its confluence with Moores
Creek..." (Subdivision Ordinance).
Enforcement and administration of stormwater management
falls under different agencies. The Engineering Department
approves drainage structures on site plans but may not inspect
these facilities during construction. The erosion control
officer is not specifically charged with stormwater management
enforcement and may not discover stormwater problems during
construction or when investigating complaints. Inspection of
stormwater management facilities is beyond the normal scope of
zoning and building inspectors and site plan violations may be
overlooked.
Quantifying existing drainage problems remains difficult
in the absence of any inventory of on-site facilities
constructed for individual development projects. Facilities
for runoff control require a permit and thus can be identified.
Other stormwater structures necessary to meet subdivision
requirements have been documented only on individual site
plans. There is no comprehensive inventory of all drainage
structures nor an analysis of how these structures are related
within a given drainage area.
A file of drainage complaints has been compiled in the
Engineering Department. A 1983 Urban Drainage Study was
conducted in response to drainage complaints and CIP projects
were prioritized on the basis of that study. While the number
of complaints from a particular area can give some indication
of drainage needs, it does not provide any engineering analysis
of how to address problems. Prioritization of individual
drainage projects should be based on an analysis of where a
given control measure can produce the greatest benefit for the
least cost. An identified staff person to begin an inventory
of existing facilities and develop an analysis of the scope of
the problem could facilitate better prioritization.
These short term items describe the immediate problem.
The following discussion of long term issues identifies the
need for a more comprehensive stormwater management program.
...
Stormwater Report, page 3
LONG TERM:
Long term issues are related to lack of adequate financing
to accomplish all drainage improvements and impending state and
federal regulations which could impact local stormwater
management. Remedial maintenance projects are beyond the means
of an individual homeowner and often beyond the means of a
homeowner's association. If the County responds to a
particular problem by becoming involved in remedial
maintenance, it has established a precedent of public
involvement in drainage improvements which results in a
never-ending and escalating reliance on public funds. This
long term problem demands that the County begin to look at
innovative financing mechanisms to achieve both retrofitting of
existing drainage problems and planning of capital investment
for future facilities.
House bill 1770, passed in the General Assembly this year,
enables the use of stormwater utilities by Virginia localities.
A stormwater utility relies on user fees rather than general
tax revenues to fund the planning, design and construction of
capital projects, as well as ongoing maintenance, inspection,
monitoring and enforcement for existing facilities. The
utility acts to administer a comprehensive drainage program
which responds to complaints, analyzes drainage problems, and
prioritizes projects. stormwater utilities have the advantage
of being able to issue revenue bonds to finance up front
capital costs.
The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation,
Division of Soil and Water Conservation has issued Stormwater
Management Regulations which became effective on December 5,
1990. These regulations establish minimum criteria for
localities which have an adopted stormwater management program.
The Division has recently reviewed the runoff control
ordinance, stormwater provisions of the subdivision ordinance,
and erosion and sediment control ordinance and determined that
Albemarle does not have a "local program" which would require
conformance to state regulations. Even though the
determination does not require immediate action, the
regulations could have a significant impact on local stormwater
management efforts in the future.
At the federal level, the EPA has recently issued guidance
on a stormwater permitting program which will follow the
existing National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permitting required for industrial discharges.
Although federal regulations have not been developed for
municipalities with populations less than 100,000, it is
envisioned that similar regulations will be forthcoming for
these smaller jurisdictions. Current regulations require
facility NPDES (stormwater) permits for landfills, wastewater
~
stormwater Report, page 4
treatment plants, airports, vehicle maintenance facilities, and
construction sites of 5 acres or more.
Both state and federal regulations add water quality
design criteria to stormwater management in addition to
quantity controls. Monitoring of stormwater discharges and
annual reporting of pollutant loadings and reductions will be
required. These requirements will add significant costs to the
administration of a stormwater program.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the issues identified, the Water Resources
Committee recommends the following:
Short Term:
o Amend current stormwater provlslons to apply county-wide
based on imperviousness/density thresholds consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan.
o Review existing programs and consider the consolidation of
all water resource management policies in one codified
document.
o Continue to implement projects that have been funded on a
priority basis in the Capital Improvement Program.
o Authorize staffing (either in-house or on a contractual
basis) to begin an inventory of existing drainage facilities
in the county. Map regional watersheds and identify areas
where drainage complaints/problems occur most frequently.
Draft a preliminary report which outlines the scope of
drainage needs and makes recommendations for a comprehensive
drainage program.
o Work with the university of Virginia and City of
Charlottesville in a cooperative program to resolve drainage
problems and plan for future needs. Cooperative stormwater
management between the city, County and University can be
addressed by the Planning and Coordination Council (PACC).
Lonq Term:
o Track the progress of other localities as they implement
stormwater utilities and requirements of the state
stormwater regulations and federal permitting program.
o Develop a county-wide stormwater management master plan
which considers the relationship between on-site and/or
regional controls for any given drainage basin.
ws91-7
.
STORMW A TER
MANAGEMENT
Figure 1
"
/
"-..
5V'
-4>
~\ \ \ \ Runoff
Control
A..A.A.AJo.
A..A.A.AJo.
A..A.A.AJo.
~Stormwater
~
. .. .& ...
L .... .... .&
.... .... .... ....
'.'"",,",,Erosion & Sediment
L .. .... JI.
.... JI. ... ..
Detention
Control
.... ".
...
D,sf /z/ II /~I
WALTER J. KUCHARSKI
AUDITOR
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Auditor of Public Accounts
POST OFFICE BOX 1295
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23210
(804) 225-3350
p'
'"
"
-,
December 9, 1991
. 'l
't
, i ~
, , ,I
, .;..11
". ....,; l...",;..)
The Honorable Members of the
Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Dear Members:
j 0 }\ i~ i) \-; i \oJ U i) E. i~ I{i S 0 R S
We have received copies of the audited financial statements of the
County of Albemarle, Virginia, for the year ended June 30, 1991.
Section 15.1-167, Code of Virginia, provides that the audits of local
governments be conducted in accordance with the specifications of the
Aud i tor of Pub 1 i c Accounts. The Un iform Fi nanc i a 1 Report i ng Manual for
Virginia Counties and Municipalities issued in 1980, effective for years
ending on and after June 30, 1981, requires that financial reports of
Virginia localities be prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles as promulgated by the Governmental Accounting
Standards Board (GASB). The only deviation from generally accepted
accounting principles allowed by this Office is that we do not require the
capitalization of general fixed assets.
I n add i t i on to the report i ng requ i rements by the GASB, the Un i form
Financial Reporting Manual prescribes certain supplemental information
which must be included in local government financial reports. This
information is prescribed to provide local officials and other readers with
more detailed aud i ted i nformat i on to increase the mean i ngfu 1 ness of the
reports.
Upon the completion of each audit, reports are submitted to this
Office for review and approval as being presented in accordance with our
specifications. Our review is limited to proper financial reporting and
our approval of reports only provides the governing body with assurance
that such reports are presented in accordance with the specifications of
the Auditor of Public Accounts. Our review does not consist of a review of
the auditor's working papers to determine the quality of audit work.
.^'.. ~
Board Members
December 9, 1991
Page Two
We have reviewed the financial report of the County of
Virginia, and find that it is prepared in accordance
specifications of the Auditor of Public Accounts and, therefore,
is accepted by this Office.
Albemarle,
wi th the
the report
,
WJK: s 1m
cc: Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates
Certified Public Accountants
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
".
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
WALTER J, KUCHARSKI
AUDITOR
Auditor of Public Accounts
POST OFFICE BOX 1295
RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23210
(804) 225-3350
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
County Administrator/City Manager/Town Manager
County of Albemarle
DVlA,c0'
Marycarol C. White, Manager, Systems and Quality Control
December 9, 1991
Under the provisions of the Single Audit Act of 1984 and OMB Circular
A-128, local governments are required to submit a copy of their single
audit report to each provider of federal financial assistance. In
addition, local governments must submit a Corrective Action Plan addressing
all items of noncompliance and weaknesses in internal controls noted in the
auditor's report.
The Office of the Auditor of Public Accounts is providing a
clearinghouse service in the distribution of audit reports and corrective
action plans to state agencies which provided federal pass-through funds to
local governments. Accordingly, we request that you provide the following
copies of your single audit report as soon as possible:
- Copies for distribution to state agencies
--=-- Copies for APA files
- Other
In addition, our review of your single audit report indicates that
one or more items of noncompliance and/or weaknesses in internal controls
were reported on by your aud itors. Therefore, please forward to th is
Office the following copies of your corrective action plan addressing these
items as soon as it is available:
--=-- Copies for distribution to state agencies
--=-- Copies for APA files
In addition to the copies requested above for distribution to state
agencies, copies of your single audit report and corrective action plan, if
applicable, must be submitted directly to the following federal agencies:
~ Copies to the Single Audit Clearinghouse,
U.S. Bureau of the Census
~ Copies to your cognizant agency
~ Copy to each federal agency providing direct assistance
Page Two
Please be advised that failure to meet the requirements of the Single Audit
Act may result in fiscal sanctions against the local government, including
withholding of future federal financial assistance.
Should you have any questions concerning the distribution of single audit
reports and corrective action plans, please do not hesitate to contact me or Cynthia
Hartley at (804) 225-3350.
O!str~buL~d tJ
~ : ~.~ n;
i,'.'"
, I""
:.::j). --_._-~.._-"
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
FROM:
DATE:
December 6, 1991
RE:
FY 1990/91 Management Letter
Attached is the FY 1990/91 Management Letter prepared by
Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates. This letter identifies several
areas in which they are suggesting a change in our internal
procedures. None of these items represent a significant problem,
and action has been initiated to correct these items. In addition,
they have made several suggestions that would simplify the
consolidation of information for reporting purposes. This office
will be investigating methods of implementing these changes during
FY 1991/92.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
s
Enclosure
. 1p
ROBINSON~ FARMER~ Cox AsSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
DATE:
September 18, 1991
M&~ORANDUM TO: County of Albemarle
FROM: RobinsQn, Farmer, Cox Associates
~~,,~CO)G a<fua~m
This memorandum is a follow-up to our audit of the financial statements of the County of
Albemarle for the year ended June 30; 1991. During our audit we became aware of several
matters that we believe should be brought to your attention. This memorandum is
primarily to communicate our finding to you and request your reply to corrective action
initiated.
Accounting System:
The accounting system, as implemented, is designed to provide internal controls over
financial management information. In particular instances the separation of this
financial information within the accounting system does not readily complement
financial reporting.
During the preparation of both financial statements and the annual school report
individual funds must be consolidated and reported in the school fund. This
consolidation involves not only actual revenues and expenditures, but also the
original budget as adopted for each fund.
Similar circumstances exist with funds maintained as part of the Federal and State
Grant Fund. Although such funds may be maintained internally for management control
purposes, the individual funds should be merged with the appropriate fund type for
financial reporting and preparation of the annual school report where appropriate,
The capability of the present accounting system appears to limit the ability to
summarize and report financial information at levels commensurate with the financial
reporting requirements under the Uniform Financial Revorting Manual. Presently,
preparation of the financial information for both financial and comparative cost
reporting is independent of the accounting system.
The ability to generate the appropriate financial and comparative cost report should
be an extension of the present financial management information system and not as a
direct effort requiring an additional verification and reconciliation process.
Further, internal control procedures should be
recording of all interfund transactions, Such
reconciled on a periodic basis.
implemented to ensure consistent
interfund transactions should be
Cash:
o All bank accounts maintained by the County should be reconciled by accounting
in a timely manner. Several bank accounts are reconciled by individuals
outside the accounting department; however, no procedures exist to verify that
these bank accounts reconcile to the accounting system general ledger.
o Transactions of the McIntire Trust Fund should be recorded in the accounting
system and reconciled to the trustee statements on a monthly basis.
o Performance bonds should be accounted for in a separate agency fund. The
subsidiary ledger should be reconciled to the accounting system general ledger
control account on a monthly basis.
Receivables:
o Procedures should be implemented to record and reconcile year end accounts
rece i vab Ie directly to a general ledger control account. Such procedures
would eliminate a bank reconciliation adjustment and subsequent entries to
record the accounts receivable. Further, this procedure would insure the
proper recording of revenues to the current fiscal year.
o Procedures should be implemented within the accounting system to control
various local tax revenue accounts. This procedure would permit the control
over uncollected billed revenues such as business and professional licenses.
Also, any collected and unremitted revenue could be identified in a timely
manner.
Other:
o Payments under capital lease obligations should be identified and recorded in
the debt service fund as principal retirements and interest.
o Activity of individual special welfare accounts should be reconciled to the
accounting system general ledger on a monthly basis.
o Procedures should be implemented to ensure accurate recording of designated
year end fund balance adjustments in the accounting system.
o The purchasing policy manual should indicate the specific number of required
quotes for the purchase of particular goods and/or services. Also, quote
sheets may be used as a method to document the procurement process.
o Job responsibilities/descriptions should be documented to support various
personnel functions within the accounting and finance departments.
Consideration should be given to cross-training personnel for ensured
operational support. Further, an accounting policy and procedures manual
should be developed defining all accounting functions within the accounting
system.
o A comprehensive organization chart should be developed that clearly identifies
each functional department with departmental lines of authority.
General Fixed Assets:
o Growth within Albemarle County in the next few years may require the issuance
of additional indebtedness to finance needed capital proj ects, Bond rating
agencies look favorably upon local governments who prepare a Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report in accordance with standards set by the Government
Finance Officers's Association. The maj or obstacle to the County's issuing
such a report is having a record of its general fixed assets recorded in this
audit report. We recommend the County develop a timetable for the recording
of its general fixed assets and the preparation of a Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report.
12.(P,9/
.'1/,) ZA j.g ~t>~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
\: )
, \
I
1 II
" ,
!.'
I;.
,i!
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
FROM:
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
DATE:
December 5, 1991
RE:
FY 1990/91 Audit Report
Attached is the completed Audit for FY 1990/91 prepared by
Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates. No discrepancies or material
weaknesses were found as indicated in their Audit Report on
internal controls and compliance.
There are no significant changes in fund balances resulting
from their audit. Due to the consolidation of various grants and
self-sustaining funds with the General Fund and School Fund, as
required for reporting purposes, you cannot compare the audited
fund balances as presented here to our previous reports.
In reviewing the attached Audit I would suggest that
attention be given to the "NOTES" found on pages 8-28. The
contain essential data needed to understand how the
financial statements are prepared and consolidated.
special
"NOTES"
actual
The Audit and Comparative Cost Report have been submitted to
the State Auditor of Public Accounts and has been approved.
Current plans are to present the Audit to the Board of
Supervisors on December 11, 1991. Mr. Irving "Jack" Farmer will
make this presentation and be available for questions.
Please contact me prior to this meeting if you have any
specific questions.
MAB/bs
Enclosure
cc: Robert Paskel
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
lZc~' CZL,
;. ~/ZJI,ifJ~
,.....~----..-
...
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors ~
r-
County Executive !
'"
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
December 3, 1991
RE: Traffic Unit - Motorcycles
Attached is a copy of a proposal from Chief Miller regarding
the addition of motorcycles to our traffic enforcement program
which also carry several other operational benefits. Staff
requests approval of the concept with the first two motorcycles
purchased from existing resources.
RWT,Jr/REH,II/bat
91-111
Attachment
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
~~s ~r., m!f":"'?> t,;' !;1 ~ ;e,...'iIl.'J
,., ~,' '1i~: :;.~ ';-;1.... ~f 'L~ ~_~ :-:t
.____..t<_"'-J',L..l.I...,.. ,.
~lfi ~
Dr'''' 3' 199 '1'1 p'
, t.C.. 1 l~ ~
~li ~,
:I
'. ,~', 5f--:'5~";; , , .
~11;if f~:" 4. ~~1I U
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RICHARD E. HUFF, JR., DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE
CHIEF JOHN F. MILLER*' ~-
DECEMBER 3, 1991
RE:
TRAFFIC UNIT - MOTORCYCLES
During the first ten (10) months of calendar year 1991, the
County Police Department investigated 1396 accidents, a 12.5%
increase over the same period of 1990. The Department issued
1417 traffic citations during the first ten months of 1991, a
46.02% decrease over the same period of 1990. Traffic related
calls accounted for 20.3% of the total calls for services during
the first ten months of 1991.
This data demonstrates the large demands placed on the
patrol division for traffic related calls. While traffic
enforcement and the maintenance of traffic flow will always be a
primary function of the beat officer, a specialized traffic unit
will allow the Police Department to accomplish this part of our
mission more effectively.
While staffing levels do not allow for a full time traffic
unit at this time, a variety of benefits will be recognized by
adding motorcycles to the police department's fleet. Some of the
major benefits include:
1. More Effective Police Response - In areas of high
traffic, or in an area where a traffic accident has
occurred, maneuvering of police cruisers is very
difficult. The use of motorcycles will allow officers
to navigate in these areas much more easily, improving
our response time to traffic incidents, as well as
other emergency calls. Police motorcycles can also
access areas that are not accessible by cruiser; ie.
park trails, school grounds, etc.
2. Enhance Traffic Enforcement Efforts - Police motorcyles
make traffic law enforcement much easier for the
officer. In areas of high traffic volumes, a police
Mr. Richard Huff, Jr.
December 3,1991
Page Two
officer may observe a traffic violation, but is unable
to stop the violator due to safety concerns. Due to
the maneuverability of the police motorcycle, the
officer is able to enforce traffic laws more
effectively. Voluntary compliance of traffic laws
increases with the presence of police motorcycles. The
motoring public recognizes that the officer can very
easily maneuver through traffic to apprehend
violators. With a conventional police vehicle, some
motorists recognize the near impossibility of an
officer effecting a traffic stop during peak traffic
times, or in high volume traffic areas.
3. Community Relations - The police motorcycle provides an
excellent opportunity for the officer to relate with
the community. The police rnotorcyle makes the officer
more approachable by citizens. He is open, and highly
visible. There are no "barriers" to communication, as
found with a police cruiser. This increased level of
approachability allows for more positive community
contacts.
4. Special Events - There are many special events that are
more effectively policed by an officer on a
motorcycle. Examples include policing large crowds
(such as Foxfield) and providing dignitary escorts.
The approximate cost for one fully equipped police
motorcycle is approximately $12,000.00. The cost to equip one
officer with the helmet and other safety equipment is
approximately $700.00.
The police motorcycle will not replace the conventional
police cruiser. However, this mode of transportation makes an
officer much more effective in traffic enforcement efforts, and
is a valuable resource for the agency to have access to assist
with addressing a variety of law enforcement problems.
With the Board of Supervisor's approval, two police
motorcycles will be added to the fleet to be operational by
spring 1992. No additional appropriation will be required in
order to begin this worthwhile program with our goal stated to
add a total of six motorcycles over the next 3-4 years. Please
place this item on their next available agenda and feel free to
contact me should questions arise.
JFM/1bv
. IZ<o'91
I'il.i ~~~ OF ALBEMARLe.
o<If"'~j;M'"
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Personnel/Human Resources Department
Albemarle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
EXECUTIVE OfFICE
From:
Dr. Carole A. Hastings, Director of Personnel/Human
h
Resources ~
To:
Robert w. Tucker, Jr. County Executive
Date: November 26, 1991
Re: Request for Exception to Payment Procedure for Terminating Employees
Background
Prior to November, 1989 local government employees who terminated their
employment were paid $25 per day for unused sick leave up to a maximum of 100
days. with the completion of the work on commonality of personnel practices,
the Board of Supervisors eliminated the payment for sick leave upon
termination. In its place, the Board adopted a policy of paying $200 per year
for each year of continuous service, for up to 25 years, upon retirement.
In adopting the new retirement bonus, the Board provided that employees
hired prior to November, 1989 could choose to be paid for sick leave or the
retirement bonus upon leaving employment. The option chosen at that point was
to be binding and was not to change despite the circumstances governing the
termination.
Recently, an employee was notified that their employment would be
terminated due to the results of an election. Since she originally planned to
retire, she had chosen the retirement option for payment. This situation,
plus the possibility of other employees having their employment terminated
through no fault of their own, has led to a recommendation for an exception.
Rec01IIDendation
That the Board allow employees who are being terminated through no fault
of their own to reexamine their original payment option and to choose the
option which best suits their needs at the time they are terminated.
I would appreciate your presenting this recommendation to the Board for
approval and would be happy to discuss this further with you if necessary.
CAH/ac
m-911126
...
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
ARTICLE II, CHAPTER 15, OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE, KNOWN AS
"EQUALIZATION OF PAY OF CERTAIN BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
BE IT ORDAINED by the
County, Virginia, that Article
Code of Albemarle, is hereby
follows:
Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
II, Chapter 15, Section 15-2, of the
amended and reenacted to read as
Sec. 15-2. Enumerated.
Each member of the following boards and commissions duly
appointed by the board of supervisors shall be paid thirty-five
dollars ($35.00) for each and every regularly scheduled meeting of
the board or commission actually attended, as set forth in the
rules and regulations of that board or commission: board of zoning
appeals; BOCA code board of appeals; equalization board; fire
prevention code board of appeals; and, land use tax advisory board.
AND FURTHER ORDAINED that this ordinance shall be effective on
and after July 1, 1992.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a
true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board
of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting
held on December 11, 1991.
~.(f~
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
D;:';ibuted to Board- 11--% -u
Ag(]nda Item No. 4/0///.3>'iis
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ~. ~
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive ~I
October 31, 1991
Amendment to Equalization of Pay Ordinance
This is a request to add the BOCA Code Board of Appeals and
the Fire Prevention Code Board of Appeals to the County's
Equalization of Pay Ordinance.
In July, 1990, the Board approved a policy reVlSlon to the
Equalization of Pay Ordinance that limited compensation to those
agencies that are set by state statute as citizen appeal boards.
The Ordinance now includes the Board of Zoning Appeals, the
Equalization Board and the Land Use Advisory Board. The BOCA
Code Board of Appeals and the Fire Prevention Code Board of
Appeals were not added to the Ordinance at that time and have
since requested that they also receive the $35 per meeting
compensation. Both boards meet approximately 4-5 times a year
for an additional cost to the County of $350.
Staff recommends that the BOCA Code Board of Appeals and the
Fire Prevention Code Board of Appeals be included in the
Equalization of Pay Ordinance, that a public hearing be scheduled
in December, and that the County Code be amended to reflect this
change effective with the beginning of the fiscal year,
July 1, 1992.
RWT,Jr/RWW/bat
91-107
...
-.12",,&' 1L,.
q / / 1/1 ~L?!~-::
1;,
o R DIN A NeE
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
ARTICLE II, CHAPTER 15, of the Code of Albemarle, known as
"EQUALIZATION OF PAY OF CERTAIN BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS"
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that Article II, Chapter 15, Section 15-2, of the Code of Albemarle, is hereby
amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 15-2. Enumerated.
Each member of the following boards and commissions duly appointed by the
board of supervisors shall be paid thirty-five dollars ($35.00) for each and
every regularly scheduled meeting of the board or commission actually attended,
as set forth in the rules and regulations of that board or commission: board of
zoning appeals; BOCA code board of appeals; equalization board; fire prevention
code board of appeals; and, land use tax advisory board.
* * * * *
~
r.....~ {<'''-'''',
I". r It. )/.':'.'!1 1
I"'. , . .
I. .
,;
I , .
~~, ., ,
,::<::.,,~.,..Ij
\
i "
L..,,,,.J
Edward H Baln, Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Charlotte Y Humphns
.Jack Jouett
David P Bowe,man
Charlottesville
Waite, F Perkins
White Hall
F R (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Pete, T Way
ScottsvllI",
TO: Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
DATE: December 12, 1991
SUBJECT: Board Actions of December 11, 1991
At its meeting on December 11, 1991, the Board of Supervisors
took the following actions:
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Memorandum dated November 22, 1991, from
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance, addressed to Rick Huff, Deputy
County Executive, forwarding a request from the Albemarle Housing
Improvement Program (AHIP) that they be allowed to retain the
surplus from Fiscal Year 1989-90 for use in other projects.
AUTHORIZED AHIP to carryover FY 1989-90 surplus County funds in
the amount of $13,840.06.
Agenda Item No. 17a. Appropriation request: From the Educa-
tion Department to appropriate Additional State Revenues. APPROVED
the attached appropriation request for an additional $108,524 in
State funding received, to be held in reserve. Attached is the
signed appropriation form.
Agenda Item No. 17b. Appropriation: Fire/Rescue
APPROVED an appropriation for $1300 to purchase office
and equipment in the Fire/Rescue Coordinator's office.
the signed appropriation form.
Coordinator.
furniture
Attached is
LEN:ec
Attachments
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Roxanne White
Tracy Holt
Robert W. paskel
Mike Schlemmer
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
J FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910029
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
I FUND
GENERAL
/PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR PURCHASE OF OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT
IN THE FIRE/RESCUE COORDINATOR OFFICE.
-./ EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
/************************************************************************
1100032031800200 FURNITURE & FIXTURES $1,300.00
. TOTAL
/
$1,300.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
./
J 2100051000510100
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
$1,300.00
! TOTAL
$1,300.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
APPROVALS:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
~.~
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
/,;f'- ~"<7/
/,7-/:;1-';9'/
f
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
... FISCAL YEAR 91/92 NUMBER 910028
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES
NO X
-FUND SCHOOL
-PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITIONAL FUNDING OF BASIC SCHOOL AID
EXPENDITURE
-COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1241061101580000 SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE $108,524.00
TOTAL
$108,524.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
- 2200024000240202 BASIC SCHOOL AID $108,524.00
TOTAL
$108,524.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~~
//- 2 '? - 7/
/-'-8 -? /
,
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
/Z'0'1./
ql,f 2-//. flog
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
,
v.r..
.;
FROM:
Robert Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Robert W. Paskel, Division superintenden~
November 15, 1991
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Request for Appropriation of Additional state Funding
As you are aware, Governor Wilder was successful in
restoring $15 million for public education for the 1991-92 fiscal
year. Albemarle county Schools' portion of the $15 million is
$108,524.00. The Department of Education has also stated sales
tax revenue is currently lower than projected and the average
daily membership for the state as a whole is higher than
anticipated. Based on this information, Albemarle County could
see a reduction in state revenue in the near future.
At its November 11, 1991 meeting, the School Board,
therefore, agreed to accept this additional revenue and hold it
in reserve as follows:
REVENUE:
2-2000-24000-240202 Basic School Aid $108,524.00
EXPENDITURE:
1-2410-61101-580000 School Board Reserve $108,524.00
It is requested the Board of Supervisors amend the
appropriation ordinance accordingly.
/TLSH
xc: Melvin Breeden
Estelle Neher
IL.' {p (1/
~L~!i! i.,;. Cj " t LJ l ' g'(t-Ci
_LLc~_._>~j
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
November 12, 1991
Request for Appropriation
Funds in the amount of $1,800 were appropriated in the 1990-91
budget for office furniture and equipment for the Fire/Rescue
Coordinator. Because the position was not filled until May, 1990
and due to space constraints, the funds were not spent in FY 91 and
were not requested to be carried over into FY 92. These funds,
therefore, reverted back to the General Fund.
Now that a suitable space has been found for the position, staff
recommends that $1,300 be appropriated to the Fire/Rescue
Coordinator's budget in order to purchase a chair, a typewriter, a
calculator, and some shelves. Other office furniture and equipment
has been secured from other departments in order to reduce the
request.
RWT,Jr/REH,II/dbm
91. 200
MOTION: Mr. Bowerman
SECOND: Mrs. Humphris
MEETING DATE: December 11, 1991
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has
convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1
requires a certification by the
Supervisors that such executive
conformity with Virginia law;
of the Code of Virginia
Albemarle County Board of
meeting was conducted in
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.
VOTE:
AYES: Messrs. Bowerman, Bowie, Mrs. Humphris, Mr. Perkins
and Mr. Way.
NAYS: None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE: Mr. Bain.
ABSENT DURING MEETING: None.
(-
llcz W ( (tAu
Deputy Clerk, Albemarle Cou y Board
of Supervisors f
~
Edwa,d H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
MEMORANDUM
Charlotte Y. Humph,is
Jack Jouett
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F. Pe,kins
White Hall
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
TO:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
and Community Development
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC ~ ~ ~
DATE: December 26, 1991
FROM:
SUBJECT: Board Actions of December 11, 1991
Attached is paperwork for the following actions taken by the Board of
Supervisors at its meeting on December 11, 1991:
Agenda Item No.9. STA-91-1. Public Hearing: Amendment to Chapter 18 of
Albemarle Code to incorporate VDoT mountainous terrain and rolling terrain
standards. ADOPTED the attached ordinance to amend Chapter 18 of the Albemarle
County Code to incorporate VDoT mountainous terrain and rolling terrain stand-
ards as presented.
Agenda Item No. 19. ZTA-91-08. Public Hearing on An ordinance to amend
and reenact Section 35.0 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance entitled
"Fees." ADOPTED the attached ordinance to amend and reenact Section 35.0 of the
Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance entitled "Fees," to be effective April 1,
1992. Amended Zoning Ordinance sheets will follow under separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 20. STA-91-02. Public Hearing on An ordinance to amend
and reenact Article 18-43, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land, of the Code of
Albemarle, entitled "Fees." ADOPTED the attached ordinance to amend and reenact
Section 18-43, Fees, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land, of the Code of Albemarle,
to be effective April 1, 1992.
Agenda Item No. 21. Public Hearing: An ordinance to amend and reenact
various sections and chapters of the Code of Albemarle to increase fees as
follows: Sec 2.1-2 relating to the application fee for an agricultural/forestal
district; Sec 7-4, erosion and sedimentation control, to increase the fee for
Date:
Page 2
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 26, 1991
Memo To:
plan review; to amend Sec 9 of the Water Resources Protection Ordinance in
subsection (c) and subsection (d) to require payment of a fee. ADOPTED the
attached ordinance to amend and reenact the following sections of the Code of
Albemarle to increase fees:
Section 2.1-2 of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, in
subsection (c);
Section 7-4 of Chapter 7, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, in subsection
(d);
Section 9 of the Water Resources Protection Ordinance in subsection (c)
Minor Water Quality Impact Assessment and (d) Major Water Quality Impact Assess-
ment;
All amendments to be effective April 1, 1992.
Agenda Item No. 22. Public Hearing: The Board will also consider adopting
a resolution setting a fee for submission of a Comprehensive Plan amendment, a
fee for requests to be included in service area boundaries of the Albemarle
County Service Authority; and, requests for abandonment of roads which mayor
may not have been a part of the State Secondary System of Highways.
ADOPTED the attached resolution to establish a fee for Comprehensive Plan
amendments by amending and reenacting Paragraph No. 2 of the POLICY FOR SUBMIT-
TAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIR-
GINIA.
ADOPTED the attached resolution to establish fees for requests to amend
service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority to include
property for water and/or sewer service.
ADOPTED the attached resolution to establish a fee for requests to abandon
roads which mayor may not have been a part of the State Secondary System of
Highways.
ADOPTED the attached ordinance to amend and reenact the Zoning Ordinance in
Section 4.15.4.1, Sign Permits. Amended Zoning Ordinance sheets will follow
under separate cover.
All actions to be effective April 1, 1992.
LEN:ec
Attachments
cc: Robert B. Brandenburger
Richard E. Huff, II
Amelia Patterson
George R. St. John
..
,.
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND AND REENACT
SECTION 18-36, PRIVATE ROADS, CHAPTER 18,
SUBDIVISION OF LAND
OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, that Section 18-36, Private Roads, Chapter 18, Subdivision of
Land, of the Code of Albemarle, is amended and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 18-36. Private roads.
Private roads are intended to be permitted as the exception to
construction and dedication of public roads in the subdivision approval
process. Granting of private road usage shall be discretionary by the
commission and shall be based on the circumstances and requirements
contained herein. Private roads are intended to promote sensitivity
toward the natural characteristics of the site and to encourage subdivi-
sion consistent and harmonious with surrounding development. Except as
otherwise expressly provided herein and permitted in accordance with
procedures of section 18-36(h), no waiver, modification or variation of
standards, and no exceptions to the application of these regulations
shall be permitted.
(a) Any subdivision, any lot of which is served by a private road
shall be subject to approval by the commission in accordance with this
chapter. Any further subdivision of land involving additional use of
such road shall be deemed a subdivision subject to the provisions of
this chapter. In order to insure adequate capacity of such road and
equitable maintenance costs to property owners, except as the commission
may provide in a particular case, not more than one dwelling unit shall
be located on any parcel served by such road.
(b) The commission may approve any subdivision served by one or
more private roads under the following circumstances:
(1) For property zoned RA, Rural Areas, the subdivider, in
accordance with section 18-36(h) of this chapter, demonstrates to the
reasonable satisfaction of the commission that:
a. Approval of such roads will alleviate a clearly
demonstrable danger of significant degradation to the environment of the
site or adjacent properties which would be occasioned by the construc-
tion of public roads in the same alignments. For the purposes of this
provision, in addition to such other factors as the commission may
consider, "significant degradation" shall mean an increase of thirty
(30%) percent in the total volume of grading for construction of a
public road as compared to a private road. As secondary considerations,
among other things, the commission may consider actual volume differen-
tial as well as surface area differential and removal of vegetative
cover; and
b. No alternative public road alignment available to the
subdivider on the adoption date of this section would alleviate signifi-
cant degradation of the environment; and
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Section 18-36, Private Roads of the Code of Albemarle
Page 2.
c. No more lots are proposed on such private road than
could be realized on a public road due to right-of-way dedication.
(2) For property zoned RA, Rural Areas, or VR, Village
Residential, where such subdivision contains only two lots and such
private road serves only the lots in such subdivision; and is the sole
and direct means of access to a road in the state highway system; or
(3) Such subdivision is intended for non-residential or
non-agricultural purposes; or
(4) Such subdivision is not located within a rural area of
the comprehensive plan and such subdivision shall be into lots and/or
units to be occupied exclusively by residential structures other than
single-family detached dwellings including appurtenant recreational uses
and open space; or
(5) Such subdivision constitutes a "family division" as
defined by section 18-56 of this chapter.
(c) In addition to the provisions of subsection 18-36(b), the
commission may approve a subdivision served by one or more private roads
in any case in which the subdivider, in accordance with subsection
18-36(h) of this chapter, demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction
of the commission that:
(1) For a specific, identifiable reason, the general public
interest, as opposed to the proprietary interest of the subdivider,
would be better served by the construction of such roads than by the
construction of public roads. In the case of any such approval, the
commission may require such assurances from the subdivider in a form
acceptable to the county attorney as it may determine to be necessary to
protect the public interest with respect to such roads.
(d) No subdivision shall be approved pursuant to subsection
18-36(b) or subsection 18-36(c), unless and until the commission shall
determine that:
(1) Any such private road will be adequate to carry the
traffic volume which may be reasonably expected to be generated by such
subdivision; and
(2) The comprehensive plan does not provide for a public road
in the approximate location of such proposed private road; and
(3) The fee of such road is to be owned by the owners of lots
abutting the right-of-way thereof or by an association composed of the
owners of all lots in the subdivision, subject in either case to any
easement for the benefit of all lots served by such road; and
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Section 18-36, Private Roads of the Code of Albemarle
Page 3.
(4) Except where required by the commission to serve a
specific public purpose, such private road shall not be designed to
serve through traffic nor to intersect the state highway system in more
than one location; and
(5) Any such private road has been approved in accordance
with Section 30.3 FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY DISTRICT of the zoning ordinance
and other applicable law.
(e) All private roads approved pursuant to this section shall be
constructed in accordance with the following:
(1) Private roads permitted under subsections 18-36(b)(1),
18-36(b)(2), and 18-36(b)(5) shall conform to the requirements of Table
A. Private roads permitted under subsections 18-36(b)(3) and 18-36(b)(4)
shall conform to the requirements of Table B except that a pavement
structure design in accordance with Virginia Department of Transporta-
tion Subdivision Street Requirements shall be required for the most
traffic-intensive uses to which such land may be lawfully devoted for a
private road approved subject to subsection 18-36(b)(3).
Except as otherwise expressly provided, private roads shall be
designed to conform in all regards to current Virginia Department of
Transportation Subdivision Street Requirements. Private roads subject
to Table A shall be designed to conform to Virginia Department of
Transportation mountainous terrain classification. Private roads
subject to Table B shall be designed to conform to Virginia Department
of Transportation rolling terrain classification.
Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to preclude the
commission from authorizing the application of Virginia Department of
Transportation mountainous terrain design standards to a private road
subject to Table B, upon finding that for a specific, identifiable
reason, the general public interest as opposed to the proprietary
interest of the subdivider, would be better served. In the case of any
such approval, the commission may require such assurances from the
subdivider in a form acceptable to the county attorney as it may deter-
mine to be necessary to protect the public interest.
(2) Except as otherwise expressly provided, a private road
approved pursuant to Table A, serving fewer than six (6) lots shall have
a minimum right-of-way of thirty (30) feet and all other private roads
approved pursuant to Table A or Table B shall have right-of-way width
conforming to the appropriate Virginia Department of Transportation
standard. Virginia Department of Transportation practice notwithstand-
ing, only those areas necessary to accommodate improvements and to
achieve required sight distance shall be required to be cleared.
Subsequent to construction ornamental plantings and other improvements
may be installed provided the same shall not conflict with sight dis-
tance, drainage facilities or other requirements.
.
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Section 18-36, Private Roads of the Code of Albemarle
Page 4.
(3) Intersections of private roads shall have an approach
grade not exceeding four (4) percent for a distance of not less than
forty (40) feet in all directions. Intersections of private and public
roads shall have an approach grade not exceeding two (2) percent for a
distance of not less than forty (40) feet in all directions. Approach
grade distance shall be measured from the edge of travelway of the road
being intersected.
(4) The developer shall submit to the county engineer a map
of the proposed subdivision having contour intervals of not greater than
twenty (20) feet showing the horizontal alignment together with field-
run profiles and typical cross-section of such roads. The county
engineer may waive requirements of the field-run profile in the case of
an existing road or where deemed appropriate due to topography.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this ordinance shall be effective
immediately.
*"I~"I<j(.*
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is
a true, correct copy of an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors
of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on December 11,
1991. ~. 7)%~/
~~oard of County Supervisors
Table A
Single-Family Detached Residential
(Also Agricultural)
NUMBER OF LOTS
SERVED BY ROAD WIDTH OF SURFACE MINIMUM
SEGMENT'" TRAVELWAY DEPTH OF BASE TREATMENT SIGHT DISTANCE
Family Division Only
(Any number of lots) See note ** See note ** See note ** See note **
2 Lots See note ** See note ** See note ** See note **
3 - 5 Lots 14 Feet (In addition to 4 6" - #25 or #26 Not required (unless 100 Feet
foot shoulders and ditch slope exceeds 7%)***
requirements)
6 Lots or More
Shall be designed to VDOT MOUTAINOUS TERRAIN Standards.
*NUMBER OF LOTS SERVED shall mean the aggregate of all lots served by such road segment and all lots having access over
such segment to a public road. ROAD SEGMENT shall mean each portion of a private road between its intersection with other
private or public roads (see illustration),
**The surveyor shall certify on the plat that the existing and/or proposed right-of-way is of adequate width and horizontal and
vertical alignment to accommodate a travelway passable by ordinary passenger vehicles in all but temporary extreme weather
conditions, together with area adequate for maintenance of such travelway. Such certification may be accomplished by the
following wording on the plat: "This private road will provide reasonable access by motor vehicle as required by S 18-36 of the
Albemarle County Code. " This provision includes family divisions.
***Ifslope exceeds seven percent, 6" of#2l or #2lA and prime & double seal are required.
ILLUSTRATION TO ACCOMPANY NOTE ONE:
C
A l
I
I E
B
D
PUBLIC ROAD
NUMBER OF LOTS SERVED:
Segment A = Lots on segment A
Segment C = Lots on Segments A, B, and C
Segment E = Lots on Segments A, B, C, D and E
Note: Any lot with frontage on more than one road segment shall be counted on each road segment on which such lot fronts,
unless access is specifically restricted by notation on the final plat.
186
\,.
Table B
Residential Uses Other Than Single-Family Detached Dwellings
(Also Commercial/Industrial)
l.shall be designed to VDOT ROLLING TERRAIN Standards.
2,The Planning Commission may require concrete curb and gutter and sidewalks or other pedestrian ways in accordance with
Section 18-39(n).
3. The Planning Commission may require increased travelway to provide for on-street parking upon a detennination that provisions
for off-street parking may be inadequate to reasonably preclude unauthorized on-street parking.
.(
o R DIN A NeE
To amend and reenact
Section 35.0, Fees,
of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended and reenacted in
Section 35.0 entitled "Fees" as follows:
35.0 FEES
Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made to the
zoning administrator, the commission, or the board of supervisors
shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth hereinafter, to defray the
cost of processing such application.
a. For a special use permit:
1. Mobile home - $35.00.
2. Rural area divisions - $990.00.
3. Commercial use - $780.00.
4. Industrial use - $810.00.
5. Private club/recreational facility - $810.00.
6. Mobile home park or subdivision - $780.00.
7. Public utilities - $810.00.
8. Grade/fill in the flood plain - $690.00.
9. Minor amendment to valid special use permit - $85.00.
10. Extending special use permits - $55.00.
11. Home Occupation-Class A - $10.00;
Home Occupation-Class B - $350.00.
12. All other uses - $780.00.
b. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance - $665.00.
c. Amendment to the zoning map:
1. For planned developments - under 50 acres - $815.00.
2. For planned developments - 50 or more acres - $1,255.00.
3. For all other zoning map amendments under 50 acres -
$815.00.
4. For all other zoning map amendments 50 or more acres -
$1,255.00.
5. Minor amendment to a zoning map amendment - $175.00.
d. Board of Zoning Appeals:
1. Request for a variance - $95.00.
2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals (including
appeals of zoning administrator's decision) - $95.00, to be
refunded if the decision of the zoning administrator is
overturned.
Ordinance amending Section 35.0 of the Zoning Ordinance
Page 2
e. Preliminary site development plan:
1. Residential - $945.00. plus $10.00/unit.
2. Non-residential - $1.260.00. plus $10.00/1000 square feet.
f. Final site development plan:
1. Approved administratively - $325.00.
2. If reviewed by the commission before approval of preliminary
site development plan - $900.00.
3. If reviewed by the commission after approval of the prelimi-
nary site development plan - $630.00.
4. For site development plan waiver - $215.00.
5. For site development plan amendment:
a) Minor - alterations to parking. circulation. building
size. location - $75.00.
b) Major - commission review - $215.00.
6. Review of site development plan by the architectural review
board - $160.00.
7. Appeal of site development plan to the board of supervisors
- $190.00.
8. Rehearing of site development plan by commission or board of
supervisors - $150.00.
9. Rejection by agent of incomplete site development plan:
a) Rejected within ten days - $160.00.
b) Suspended after site plan review - site plan fee shall
not be refunded. $50.00 fee shall be required to
reinstate project.
g. For relief from a condition of approval from commission or land-
scape waiver by agent - $140.00.
h. Change in road or development name after submittal of site
development plan:
1. Road - $15.00.
2. Development - $20.00.
;
Ordinance amending Section 35.0 of the Zoning Ordinance
Page 3
i. Extending approval of site development plan - $35.00.
j. Granting request to defer action on site development plan,
special use permit or zoning map amendment:
1. To a specific date - $25.00.
2. Indefinitely - $60.00.
k. Bond inspection for site development plan, for each inspection
after the first bond estimate - $45.00.
1. Zoning clearance - $25.00.
m. Accessory lodging permits - $25.00.
n. Official Letters:
1. Of determination - $60.00.
2. Of compliance with county ordinances- $60.00.
3. Stating number of development rights - $30.00.
o. Sign Permits:
1. Any sign, except exempted signs and signs requ1r1ng review
by the architectural review board - $25.00.
2. Signs required to be reviewed by the architectural review
board - $60.00.
In addition to the foregoing, the actual costs of any notice required
under Chapter 11, Title 15.1 of the Code shall be charged to the
applicant, to the extent that the same shall exceed the applicable fee
set forth in this section. Failure to pay all applicable fees shall
constitute grounds for the denial of any application. For any appli-
cation withdrawn after public notice has been given, no part of the
fee will be refunded.
-/: '1< "!:* *
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this ordinance shall be effective on and after
April 1, 1992.
I,
correct
County,
Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true,
copy of an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
Virginia, at a regular meetin~~~~/
Clerk, Board~~ty Su~visors
o R DIN A NeE
An Ordinance to amend and reenact
Section 18-43, Fees, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land,
of the Code of Albemarle
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that Section 18-43, Fees, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land, of the Code of
Albemarle, be amended and reenacted, as follows:
Sec. 18-43. Fees.
(a) Preliminary plat. The subdivider shall pay a fee at the time when
the preliminary plat is filed. Such fee shall be in the form of cash or a
check payable to the "County of Albemarle, Virginia," the amount thereof to be
determined in accordance with the following schedule:
(1) For review by the commission:
a. One to nine lots, five hundred sixty-five dollars ($565.00).
b. Ten to nineteen lots, eight hundred eighty dollars ($880.00).
c. Twenty or more lots, one thousand sixty dollars ($1,060.00).
(2) Each filing of a preliminary plat, whether or not a preliminary
plat for the same property has been filed previously, shall be subject to the
same requirements.
(b)
is filed.
"County of
dance with
Final plat. The subdivider shall
Such fee shall be in the form of
Albemarle, Virginia," the amount
the following schedule:
pay a fee at the time the final plat
cash or a check payable to the
thereof to be determined in accor-
(1) Commission approval:
a. One to nine lots, five hundred sixty-five dollars ($565.00).
b. Ten to nineteen lots, eight hundred eighty dollars ($880.00).
c. Twenty or more lots, one thousand sixty dollars ($1,060.00).
(2) Administrative approval, including family divisions: seventy-five
dollars ($75.00).
(3) Exempt plat: Twenty dollars ($20.00).
(4) Condominium plat: Eighty dollars ($80.00).
(5) In addition to the foregoing, in the case of any plat on which is
shown any road to be dedicated to public use, or any private road, the subdivider
shall pay to the county a fee equal to the cost of the inspection of
An Ordinance to amend and reenact
Section 18-43, Fees, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land
Page 2
the construction of any such road. Such fee shall be paid upon completion of
all necessary inspections and shall be deemed a part of the cost of
construction of such road for the purposes of section 18-19.
(c) Waiver request of subdivision requirement: One hundred forty dollars
($140.00).
(d) Relief from conditions by commission on plat: One hundred forty
dollars ($140.00).
(e) Appeal of plat to board of supervisors: One hundred ninety dollars
($190.00).
(f) Redating of plat, approved and not recorded: Ten dollars ($10.00).
(g) Change in road or development name after submittal of plat:
(1) Change in road name: Fifteen dollars ($15.00).
(2) Change in development name: Twenty dollars ($20.00).
(h) Extending approval of plat: Thirty-five dollars ($35.00).
(i) Granting request to defer action on plat to:
(1) A specific date: Twenty-five dollars ($25.00).
(2) Indefinitely: Sixty dollars ($60.00).
(j) Bonding inspection for plat: Forty-five dollars ($45.00).
(k) Request to board of supervisors to vacate a plat: One hundred thirty-
five dollars ($135.00).
-1<"1<"1::*"1:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this ordinance shall be effective on and after
April 1, 1992.
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true,
correct of an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, for a meeting held on December 11, ~ - ~~--L
Cl~,~ard of cou~~;:;~isoiS.
o R DIN A NeE
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance in
Section 4.15.4.1, Sign Permits
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance be amended and reenacted in Section
4.15.4.1 entitled "Sign Permits" to read as follows:
4.15.4.1 SIGN PERMITS
No person shall erect or cause to be erected any sign, except auction
and temporary event signs, in excess of five (5) square feet in area
unless and until a permit therefor shall have been obtained from the
zoning administrator.
AND FURTHER RESOLVED that this ordinance shall be effective on and after
April 1, 1992.
"1< "/e "Ie "/< ,,<
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true
correct, copy of an ordinance adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on December 11, 1991.
~;f)1lA/
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
o R DIN A NeE
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Sections of the Code of Albemarle
Related to Fees
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that Section 2.1-2 of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the
Code of Albemarle, in subsection (c), is hereby amended and reenacted to read as
follows:
(c) Each application for creation of an agricultural and forestal district
shall be accompanied by a fee of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00). No fee
shall be charged for adding parcels to an agricultural and forestal district, or
for reviewing an existing agricultural and forestal district.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Section 7-4 of Chapter 7, Erosion and Sedimen-
tation Control, of the Code of Albemarle, is hereby amended and reenacted in
subsection (d) to read as follows:
(d) Upon the submission of any plan sebmitted pursuant to section 7-3, the
applicant shall pay to the county a~fee~~orty dollars to cover the cost to
the county to review and to act upon soil erosion plans for residential or
agricultural sites; and one hundred dollars ($100.00) to review and act upon
such plans for all other sites. For each erosion control inspection necessi-
tated by this plan, a fee of thirty dollars ($30.00) shall be paid by the
applicant. The maximum fee chargeable under this section, inclusive of inspec-
tions, shall not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that Section 9 of the Water Resources Protection
Ordinance be amended and reenacted in subsection (c) and subsection (d) to read
as follows:
Sec. 9. Water Quality Impact Assessment.
(c) Minor Water Quality Impact Assessment:
A minor water quality impact assessment shall be required for any
development which results in land disturbance of greater than two thousand five
hundred (2500) square feet but less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet
within resource protection areas and requires any modification or reduction of
the landward fifty (50) feet of the one hundred (100) foot buffer area. A minor
assessment must demonstrate that the remaining buffer area and necessary best
management practices will effectively achieve pollutant removal equivalent to
the one hundred (100) foot buffer. A request for a minor assessment shall
include a site drawing, accompanied by a fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) in the
form of cash or a check made payable to the "County of Albemarle, Virginia," to
scale which shows the following:
. .
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Sections of the Code of A bemarle Related to Fees
Page 2.
(d) Major Water Quality Impact Assessment:
A major water quality impact assessment shall be required for any
development which results in ten thousand (10,000) square feet of land distur-
bance or greater within resource protection areas and requires modification or
reduction of the landward fifty (50) feet of the one hundred (100) foot buffer
area. A request for a major water quality impact assessment shall be accompa-
nied by a fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) in the form of cash or a check made
payable to the "County of Albemarle, Virginia," and shall include the elements
listed for a minor water quality impact assessment, and the following additional
information:
AND FURTHER RESOLVED that this ordinance shall be effective on and after
April I, 1992.
* "I: '1:: "!: "if:
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true,
correct copy of an ordinance adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on December II, 1991.
~ai.~
Clerk, Board of ounty Supervisors
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that a fee is hereby established for a request
to abandon roads which mayor may not have been a part of the
State Secondary System of Highways, to read as follows:
Request to abandon roads which mayor may not have been a
part of the State Secondary System of Highways - $135.00.
AND FURTHER RESOLVED that this fee shall be effective on and
after April 1, 1992.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
regular meeting held on December 11, 1991.
~/7~
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that a fee is hereby established for requests to
amend service area boundaris of the Albemarle County Service
Authority to include property for water and/or sewer service, to
read as follows:
Request to amend service area boundaries of the Albemarle
County Service Authority to include property for water and/or
sewer service - $130.00; however, no fee shall be charged for
emergency requests when public safety is an issue.
AND FURTHER RESOLVED that this fee shall be effective on and
after April 1, 1992.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
regular meeting held on December 11, 1991.
4~.?~4
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
.
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that a fee is hereby established for Comprehensive Plan amendments by amending
and reenacting Paragraph No. 2 of the POLICY FOR SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSED AMEND-
MENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, to read as
follows:
2. Comprehensive Plan amendment applications may be filed at the Depart-
ment of Planning and Community Development on or before the first Tuesday,
respectively, of the months of March and September. The application should be
accompanied by cash or a check made payable to the "County of Albemarle, Virgin-
ia," in the amount of three hundred and fifteen dollars ($315.00).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that fees are hereby established for items as set
out below:
Request to amend service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service
Authority to include property for water and/or sewer service - $130.00; however,
no fee shall be charged for emergency requests when public safety is an issue.
Request to abandon roads which mayor may not have been a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways - $135.00.
AND FURTHER RESOLVED that these fees shall be effective on and after
April I, 1992.
* "I:: -I:: * "I::
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true,
correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on December II, 1991.
/7 .. ~~
c~cofm!!l4
Edward H Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charlotte Y Humphns
Jack Jouett
David P. Bowe,man
Charlottesville
Waite, F. Perkins
While Hall
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
DATE: December 26, 1991
SUBJECT: Supplement No. 64 to the Zoning Ordinance
Attached are new sheets to be inserted in your copy of the
Zoning Ordinance. This supplement was occasioned by amendments
made on December 11, 1991.
LEN:ec
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
George R. St. John
Richard E. Huff, II
Robert B. Brandenburger
Peyton Robertson
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Amelia Patterson
Clerk
be closer to another such sign than one thousand five
hundred (1,500) feet on the same side of a right-of-way.
Political, Public and No Trespassing, Hunting and Fishing
Signs.
Sale or Rental Signs: Provided: not more than two (2)
signs with an aggregate area of sixty-four (64) square feet
and limited to sixteen (16) feet in height.
Temporary Event Signs: provided: (a) not more than sixteen
(16) square feet in area; (b) not more than two (2) on any
lot or premises.
4.15.4 ADMINISTRATION OF SIGNS
4.15.4.1 SIGN PERMITS
No person shall erect or cause to be erected any sign,
except auction and temporary event signs, in excess of five
(5) square feet in area unless and until a permit therefor
shall have been obtained from the zoning administrator.
Such permit shall be issued upon the payment of a fee in the
amount of twenty dollars ($20.00) to cover the cost incident
to the issuance of such permit and upon a finding by the
zoning administrator that the proposed sign conforms to the
requirements of this ordinance. (Amended 6-7-89)
4.15.4.2 SIGNS PROHIBITED
No sign which is visible from any federal interstate highway
system or designated scenic highway or byway system is
permitted in any zone, except for on-site sale or rental
signs and on-site business signs, providing the permitted
signs follow the requirements set forth in section 4.15.
4.15.4.3 REMOVAL OF SIGNS
Whenever a sign becomes structurally unsafe or endangers the
safety of a structure or premises or the public, or is
erected or maintained in violation of this ordinance, the
zoning administrator shall order such sign to be made safe
or comply with this ordinance, as the case may be, or be
removed. Such order shall be sent by registered mail and
shall be complied with within twelve (12) days from the date
of mailing said order by the persons owning or responsible
for the sign. Failure to comply shall constitute grounds
for the zoning administrator to have the sign removed, and
the cost thereof shall be added to any fine imposed for
violation under this ordinance.
-56-
(Supp. #46, 6-7....89)
35.0
FEES
Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made
to the zoning administrator, the commission, or the board of
supervisors shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth
hereinafter, to defray the cost of processing such applic-
ation.
a. For a special use permit:
1. Mobile home and home occupation - $25.00.
2. Rural area divisions - $165.00.
3. Commercial use - $165.00.
4. Industrial use - $165.00.
5. Private club/recreational facility - $165.00.
6. Mobile home park or subdivision - $165.00.
7. Public utilities - $130.00.
8. All other uses - $100.00.
b. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance -
$65.00.
c. 1.
2.
d. 1.
2.
e. 1.
2.
3.
For amendment to zoning map - $165.00
plus $l/acre.
For amendment to zoning map for planned
developments - $520.00 plus $l/acre.
For requests for a variance to the board of zoning
appeals - $65.00.
For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals -
$25.00.
For preliminary site development plan - $520.00.
For final site development plan (administrative) -
$260.00.
For final site development plan (commission
review) :
a) Prior to preliminary plan approval - $720.00.
b) After preliminary plan approval - $300.00.
4. For site development plan waiver - $130.00.
5. For site development plan amendment:
a) Minor - alterations to parking, circulation,
building size, location - $30.00.
b) Major - commission review - $130.00.
-229-
(Supp. #46, 6-7-89)
f. For relief from a condition of approval from commission
or landscape waiver by agent - $65.00.
In addition to the foregoing, the actual costs of any notice
required under Chapter 11, Title 15.1 of the Code shall be
charged to the applicant, to the extent that the same shall
exceed the applicable fee set forth in this section.
Failure to pay all applicable fees shall constitute grounds
for the denial of any application. (Amended 5-5-82; 9-1-85;
7-1-87; 6-7-89)
-229.1-
(Supp. #46, 6-7-89)
~
POLICY FOR SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
1. Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, made by citizens,
shall be reviewed twice annually. The Planning commission or the
Board of Supervisors may initiate a Comprehensive Plan amendment
study at any time deemed appropriate.
2. Comprehensive Plan amendment applications may be filed at
the Department of Planning and Community Development on or before
the first Tuesday, respectively, of the months of March and Septem-
ber. The application should be accompanied by cash or a check made
payable to the "County of Albemarle, Virginia," in the amount of
three hundred and fifteen dollars ($315.00). This fee shall be
effective on and after April 1, 1992.
It shall be the responsibility of the citizen requesting a
Comprehensive Plan amendment to submit, in writing, the following:
A response to each of the criteria specified in this report, includ-
ing justification for the requested change (criteria are outlined
herein as items A through E). An application form should be pre-
pared by the Department of Planning and Community Development,
summarizing the guidelines of each criteria point and providing a
framework for a written response to be prepared by the applicant.
This application in full would then be submitted directly to the
Planning Commission for determination regarding the adoption of a
resolution of intent to amend the Comprehensive Plan. Should the
Planning Commission adopt a resolution of intent, the application
would then be forwarded to staff and the Site Plan Review Committee
as applicable.
If additional information is required, it is the responsibility
of the applicant to submit this information to the Planning Depart-
ment in a timely fashion. Additional information may include, but
is not limited to: slope studies, soil studies, engineering calcu-
lations and profiles, preliminary site development plans, etc. The
applicant will be informed of what specific items are required prior
to the scheduled Site Plan Review Committee meeting.
3. Notice of Comprehensive Plan amendment submission shall be
sent by first class mail to the last known address of all owners of
the property adjacent to the subject property. In any case in which
the applicant owns the adjacent property, notice shall be given to
the owners of the next adjoining property. Mailing to the address
shown on the current real estate tax assessment books of Albemarle
County shall be deemed adequate compliance with this requirement.
No Comprehensive Plan amendment shall be approved within ten (10)
calendar days of the date of the mailing of such notice. The notice
shall state the type of use proposed, specific location of develop-
ment, county office where the site development plan may be viewed,
<. "
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Policy
Page -2-
and date of the public meeting. The applicant shall reimburse the
County the cost of postage incurred for notification of adjacent
property owners.
4. Wi thin ninety days after the application deadline, the
Board of Supervisors shall take action to approve or deny applica-
tions initiated by citizens. Prior to the Board of Supervisors'
review of Comprehensive Plan amendment applications, the Planning
Commission shall review all amendment requests and make recommenda-
tions to the Board. The Site Plan Review Committee shall be consul-
ted for recommendations as necessary.
5. No Comprehensive Plan amendment application from a citizen
will be processed within six months prior to the expected date of
adoption of a major five-year Comprehensive Plan revision.
6. Prior to the deadline for Comprehensive Plan amendment
requests, the Board of Supervisors, or its agent (the Planning
Commission) should hold a public hearing for the purpose of discus-
sion and to entertain public comment on the Plan, in general. This
public hearing would provide a public forum for Planning Commission/
Board of Supervisors' requests to amend the Plan. The date, time
and purpose of the public hearing should be advertised in a newspa-
per in advance.
CRITERIA FOR THE REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS
A. The Comprehensive Plan provides a long-range guide for
direction and context of the decision-making process for public and
private land uses. The Comprehensive Plan is general in nature
rather than attempting to identify specific geographic locations.
The Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan suggests the relationship
of recommended uses to general areas. Proposed amendments to the
Land Use Map should be reviewed for compliance with the general plan
rather than area-specific or parcel-specific requests for a change
in the recommended use. The purpose of the Land Use Map is to
provide and plan for a balance of land uses, equipped with adequate
utilities and facilities, in a comprehensive, harmonious manner.
Any proposed change in the Land Use Map will be evaluated for pro-
tection of the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
rather than the proprietary interests of an individual.
B. The merit of Comprehensi~e Plan amendment requests shall be
largely determined by the fulfillment of support to the "Goals and
Objectives" specified in Chapter 9 and the "Plan Standards" outlined
in Chapter 10 of the Comprehensive Plan.
C. A primary purpose of the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use
Map is to facilitate the coordination of improvements to the trans-
portation network and the expansion of public utilities in an
economical, efficient and judicious manner. Comprehensive Plan
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Policy
Page -3-
amendments which direct growth away from designated growth areas
shall be discouraged unless adequate justification is provided.
Amendments to the boundaries of growth areas may be considered
appropriate if the request is comprehensive, proposes to follow a
logical topographic or man-made feature and is supported by adequate
justification. No Comprehensive Plan amendment shall be considered
in areas where roads are non-tolerable or utilities are inadequate
unless the improvement of those facilities is included in the
Comprehensive Plan amendment proposal.
D. Proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be evaluated
for general compliance with adopted County plans, policies, studies
and ordinances and to determine if corresponding changes are neces-
sary.
E. Except as otherwise provided, the following conditions may
be considered in the evaluation of a request to amend the Comprehen-
sive Plan.
1. Change in circumstance had occurred; or
2. Updated information is available; or
3. Subsequent portions of the Comprehensive Plan have been
adopted or developed; or
4. A portion of the Plan is incorrect or not feasible; or
5. The preparation of the Plan as required by Article
15.1-447 of the Code of Virginia was incomplete or
incorrect information was employed.
* * * * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of a policy readopted by the Board
of Supervisors of Albemarle County, virginia, at a regular meeting
held on December 11, 1991.
Adopted 4-17-85; Amended 12-11-91 to be effective April 1, 1992.
.....
, "~'-')
.. ,j
. I
, I
\ I
U
DavId P Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charlotte Y Humphns
.Jack Jouett
Edward H Bain, Jr
Samuel Miller
Walter F Perkms
WhIle Hall
F R (Rick) BowIe
Rivanna
Peter T Way
Scottsville
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
DATE: December 26, 1991
SUBJECT: Supplement No. 64 to the Zoning Ordinance
Attached are new sheets to be inserted in your copy of the
Zoning Ordinance. This supplement was occasioned by amendments
made on December 11, 1991.
LEN:ec
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
George R. St. John
Richard E. Huff, II
Robert B. Brandenburger
Peyton Robertson
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Amelia Patterson
Clerk
Sale or Rental Signs: Provided: not more than two (2)
signs with an aggregate area of sixty-four (64) square feet
and limited to sixteen (16) feet in height.
Temporary Event signs: Provided: (a) not more than sixteen
(16) square feet in area; (b) not more than two (2) on any
lot or premises.
4.15.3.9 HEAVY INDUSTRY (HI)
Auction Signs: Provided: (a) not more than thirty-two (32)
square feet in area; (b) not more than one (1) on any lot or
premises.
Business Signs, Free-standing or Projecting: Provided: (a)
if illuminated, no moving, flashing, blinking, color-
changing or exposed, bare or uncovered neon illumination or
lighting; (b) the aggregate area of such signs shall not
exceed one hundred (100) square feet; (c) no portion of such
sign shall be greater than thirty (30) feet from ground
level or the eave line of the roof of the main building
located on the premises upon which such sign is erected,
whichever is greater; (d) no more than two (2) free-standing
signs on anyone (1) lot or premises; (e) no more than three
(3) projecting signs.
Business Signs, Roof: Provided: (a) signs shall in no
manner be illuminated; (b) the aggregate area of all signs
for any establishment shall not exceed one hundred (100)
square feet; (c) sign shall be in vertical plane; (d) no
portion of sign shall exceed thirty (30) feet in height
above ground level nor project above the roof peak, includ-
ing mansard and fake mansard roofs. On a parapet wall, sign
shall not project above the parapet wall; (e) no more than
three (3) signs, including roof signs, shall be permitted
for any establishment.
Business Signs, Wall: Provided: (a) if illuminated, no
moving, flashing, blinking, color-changing, or exposed, bare
or uncovered neon illumination or lighting; (b) the aggre'"
gate area of all such signs shall not exceed three hundred
(300) square feet; (c) no portion of such sign shall be
greater than thirty (30) feet from ground level or the eave
line of the roof of the main building located on the premi-
ses upon which such sign is erected, whichever is greater.
Directional Signs: Provided no more than four (4) such
signs have on them the same name.
Location Signs: provided: (a) if illuminated, no moving,
flashing, blinking or color-changing or neon illumination or
lighting; (b) the area of the sign shall not exceed one
hundred (100) square feet; (c) no portion of the sign shall
be greater than thirty (30) feet from ground level; (d) no
more than six (6) such signs directing attention to anyone
establishment; (e) provided further that no such sign shall
-55-
be closer to another such sign than one thousand five
hundred (1,500) feet on the same side of a right-of-way.
Political, Public and No Trespassing, Hunting and Fishing
Signs.
Sale or Rental Signs: Provided: not more than two (2)
signs with an aggregate area of sixty-four (64) square feet
and limited to sixteen (16) feet in height.
Temporary Event Signs: Provided: (a) not more than sixteen
(16) square feet in area; (b) not more than two (2) on any
lot or premises.
4.15.4 ADMINISTRATION OF SIGNS
4.15.4.1 SIGN PERMITS
No person shall erect or cause to be erected any sign,
except auction and temporary event signs, in excess of five
(5) square feet in area unless and until a permit therefor
shall have been obtained from the zoning administrator.
(Amended 6-7-89) (Amended 12-11-91 to be effective 4-1-92)
4.15.4.2 SIGNS PROHIBITED
No sign which is visible from any federal interstate highway
system or designated scenic highway or byway system is
permitted in any zone, except for on-site sale or rental
signs and on-site business signs, providing the permitted
signs follow the requirements set forth in section 4.15.
4.15.4.3 REMOVAL OF SIGNS
Whenever a sign becomes structurally unsafe or endangers the
safety of a structure or premises or the public, or is
erected or maintained in violation of this ordinance, the
zoning administrator shall order such sign to be made safe
or comply with this ordinance, as the case may be, or be
removed. Such order shall be sent by registered mail and
shall be complied with within twelve (12) days from the date
of mailing said order by the persons owning or responsible
for the sign. Failure to comply shall constitute grounds
for the zoning administrator to have the sign removed, and
the cost thereof shall be added to any fine imposed for
violation under this ordinance.
-56-
(Supp. #64, 12-11-91)
35.0 FEES
Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made
to the zoning administrator, the commission, or the board of
supervisors shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth
hereinafter, to defray the cost of processing such applica-
tion.
a. For a special use permit:
1. Mobile home - $35.00.
2. Rural area divisions - $990.00.
3. Commercial use - $780.00.
4. Industrial use - $810.00.
5. Private club/recreational facility.... $810.00.
6. Mobile home park or subdivision - $780.00.
7. Public utilities - $810.00.
8. Grade/fill in the flood plain - $690.00.
9. Minor amendment to valid special use permit -
$85.00.
10. Extending special use permits.... $55.00.
11. Home Occupation-Class A - $10.00;
Home Occupation-Class B - $350.00.
12. All other uses - $780.00.
b. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance - $665.00.
c. Amendment to the zoning map:
1. For planned developments - under 50 acres -
$815.00.
2. For planned developments - 50 or more acres -
$1,255.00.
3. For all other zoning map amendments - under 50
acres - $815.00.
4. For all other zoning map amendments - 50 or more
acres - $1,255.00.
5. Minor amendment to a zoning map amendment -
$175.00.
d. Board of Zoning Appeals:
1. Request for a variance - $95.00.
2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals
(including appeals of zoning administrator's
decision) - $95.00, to be refunded if the decision
of the zoning administrator is overturned.
e. Preliminary site development plan:
1. Residential - $945.00, plus $10.00/unit.
2. Non-residential - $1,260.00, plus $10.00/1000
square feet.
-229-
(Supp. #64, 12-11-91)
f. Final site development plan:
1. Approved administratively - $325.00.
2. If reviewed by the commission before approval of
preliminary site development plan - $900.00.
3. If reviewed by the commission after approval of
the preliminary site development ,plan - $630.00.
4. For site development plan waiver - $215.00.
5. For site development plan amendment:
a) Minor - alterations to parking, circulation,
building size, location - $75.00.
b) Major - commission review - $215.00.
6. Review of site development plan by the architec-
tural review board - $160.00.
7. Appeal of site development plan to the board of
supervisors - $190.00.
8. Rehearing of site development plan by commission
or board of supervisors - $150.00.
9. Rejection by agent of incomplete site development
plan:
a) Rejected within ten days - $160.00.
b) Suspended after site plan review - site plan
fee shall not be refunded. $50.00 fee shall
be required to reinstate project.
g. For relief from a condition of approval from commission
or landscape waiver by agent - $140.00.
h. Change in road or development name after submittal of
site development plan:
1. Road - $15.00.
2. Development - $20.00.
i. Extending approval of site development plan - $35.00.
j. Granting request to defer action on site development
plan, special use permit or zoning map amendment:
1. To a specific date - $25.00.
2. Indefinitely - $60.00.
-229.1-
(Supp. #64, 12-11-91)
k. Bond inspection for site development plan, for each
inspection after the first bond estimate - $45.00.
1. Zoning clearance - $25.00.
m. Accessory lodging permits - $25.00.
n. Official Letters:
1. Of determination - $60.00.
2. Of compliance with county ordinances- $60.00.
3. Stating number of development rights - $30.00.
o. Sign Permits:
1. Any sign, except exempted signs and signs requir-
ing review by the architectural review board -
$25.00.
2. Signs required to be reviewed by the architectural
review board - $60.00.
In addition to the foregoing, the actual costs of any notice
required under Chapter 11, Title 15.1 of the Code shall be
charged to the applicant, to the extent that the same shall
exceed the applicable fee set forth in this section.
Failure to pay all applicable fees shall constitute grounds
for the denial of any application. For any application
withdrawn after public notice has been given, no part of the
fee will be refunded. (Amended 5-5-82) (Amended 9-1-85)
(Amended 7-1-87) (Amended 6-7-89) (Amended 12-11-91 to be
effective 4-1-92)
(NOTE: SECTION 35.0 WAS AMENDED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO BE
EFFECTIVE 4-1-92)
-229.2-
(Supp. #64, 12-11-91)
David P Bowe,man
Chiulottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charlotte Y Humphns
.Jack Jouett
Edward H Bain. Jr
Samuel Miller
Waller F Pe,kms
While Hall
F R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scotlsvllle
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
DATE: December 26, 1991
SUBJECT: Supplement No. 64 to the Zoning Ordinance
Attached are new sheets to be inserted in your copy of the
Zoning Ordinance. This supplement was occasioned by amendments
made on December 11, 1991.
LEN:ec
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
George R. St. John
Richard E. Huff, II
Robert B. Brandenburger
Peyton Robertson
v. Wayne Cilimberg
Amelia Patterson
Clerk
Sale or Rental Signs: Provided: not more than two (2)
signs with an aggregate area of sixty-four (64) square feet
and limited to sixteen (16) feet in height.
Temporary Event signs: Provided: (a) not more than sixteen
(16) square feet in area; (b) not more than two (2) on any
lot or premises.
4.15.3.9 HEAVY INDUSTRY (HI)
Auction Signs: Provided: (a) not more than thirty-two (32)
square feet in area; (b) not more than one (1) on any lot or
premises.
Business Signs, Free-standing or Projecting: Provided: (a)
if illuminated, no moving, flashing, blinking, color-
changing or exposed, bare or uncovered neon illumination or
lighting; (b) the aggregate area of such signs shall not
exceed one hundred (100) square feet; (c) no portion of such
sign shall be greater than thirty (30) feet from ground
level or the eave line of the roof of the main building
located on the premises upon which such sign is erected,
whichever is greater; (d) no more than two (2) free-standing
signs on anyone (1) lot or premises; (e) no more than three
(3) projecting signs.
Business Signs, Roof: Provided: (a) signs shall in no
manner be illuminated; (b) the aggregate area of all signs
for any establishment shall not exceed one hundred (100)
square feet; (c) sign shall be in vertical plane; (d) no
portion of sign shall exceed thirty (30) feet in height
above ground level nor project above the roof peak, includ-
ing mansard and fake mansard roofs. On a parapet wall, sign
shall not project above the parapet wall; (e) no more than
three (3) signs, including roof signs, shall be permitted
for any establishment.
Business Signs, Wall: Provided: (a) if illuminated, no
moving, flashing, blinking, color-changing, or exposed, bare
or uncovered neon illumination or lighting; (b) the aggre-
gate area of all such signs shall not exceed three hundred
(300) square feet; (c) no portion of such sign shall be
greater than thirty (30) feet from ground level or the eave
line of the roof of the main building located on the premi-
ses upon which such sign is erected, whichever is greater.
Directional Signs: Provided no more than four (4) such
signs have on them the same name.
Location Signs: Provided: (a) if illuminated, no moving,
flashing, blinking or color-changing or neon illumination or
lighting; (b) the area of the sign shall not exceed one
hundred (100) square feet; (c) no portion of the sign shall
be greater than thirty (30) feet from ground level; (d) no
more than six (6) such signs directing attention to anyone
establishment; (e) provided further that no such sign shall
-55-
be closer to another such sign than one thousand five
hundred (1,500) feet on the same side of a right-of-way.
Political, Public and No Trespassing, Hunting and Fishing
Signs.
Sale or Rental Signs: Provided: not more than two (2)
signs with an aggregate area of sixty-four (64) square feet
and limited to sixteen (16) feet in height.
Temporary Event Signs: Provided: (a) not more than sixteen
(16) square feet in area; (b) not more than two (2) on any
lot or premises.
4.15.4 ADMINISTRATION OF SIGNS
4.15.4.1 SIGN PERMITS
No person shall erect or cause to be erected any sign,
except auction and temporary event signs, in excess of five
(5) square feet in area unless and until a permit therefor
shall have been obtained from the zoning administrator.
(Amended 6-7-89) (Amended 12-11....91 to be effective 4-1-92)
4.15.4.2 SIGNS PROHIBITED
No sign which is visible from any federal interstate highway
system or designated scenic highway or byway system is
permitted in any zone, except for on-site sale or rental
signs and on-site business signs, providing the permitted
signs follow the requirements set forth in section 4.15.
4.15.4.3 REMOVAL OF SIGNS
Whenever a sign becomes structurally unsafe or endangers the
safety of a structure or premises or the public, or is
erected or maintained in violation of this ordinance, the
zoning administrator shall order such sign to be made safe
or comply with this ordinance, as the case may be, or be
removed. Such order shall be sent by registered mail and
shall be complied with within twelve (12) days from the date
of mailing said order by the persons owning or responsible
for the sign. Failure to comply shall constitute grounds
for the zoning administrator to have the sign removed, and
the cost thereof shall be added to any fine imposed for
violation under this ordinance.
-56-
(Supp. #64, 12-11-91)
35.0
FEES
Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made
to the zoning administrator, the commission, or the board of
supervisors shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth
hereinafter, to defray the cost of processing such applica-
tion.
a. For a special use permit:
1. Mobile home - $35.00.
2. Rural area'divisions - $990.00.
3. Commercial use - $780.00.
4. Industrial use - $810.00.
5. Private club/recreational facility - $810.00.
6. Mobile home park or subdivision - $780.00.
7. Public utilities - $810.00.
8. Grade/fill in the flood plain - $690.00.
9. Minor amendment to valid special use permit -
$85.00.
10. Extending special use permits - $55.00.
11. Home occupation-Class A - $10.00;
Home Occupation-Class B - $350.00.
12. All other uses - $780.00.
b. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance - $665.00.
c. Amendment to the zoning map:
1. For planned developments - under 50 acres -
$815.00.
2. For planned developments - 50 or more acres -
$1,255.00.
3 . For all other zoning map amendments - under 50
acres - $815.00.
4. For all other zoning map amendments - 50 or more
acres - $1,255.00.
5. Minor amendment to a zoning map amendment -
$175.00.
d. Board of zoning Appeals:
1. Request for a variance - $95.00.
2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals
(including appeals of zoning administrator's
decision) - $95.00, to be refunded if the decision
of the zoning administrator is overturned.
e. Preliminary site development plan:
1. Residential - $945.00, plus $10.00/unit.
2. Non-residential - $1,260.00, plus $10.00/1000
square feet.
-229-
(Supp. #64, 12-11-91)
t.
).a-o.~
. I:.e o.e"e1.o?e<>1:. " - $'" ~ <; .00.1. of.
'< \.<>"1. s'- . 1:."" I:.\. "e 1."1 """" 0""
eO. """,\.<>'-s .' 0<> "pef.o"e $ <;lOa' 00 .
~"""o" co~,-ss'- 1.,,<>-
. eo."P"1 I:.",e "e1.0"",e<>I:." ,,0""1. of.
1. i "e",:e'" "1 s \. I:.e o.e . "f.l:.e" """- $".,,0.00.
~"e 1.\."''-<>'''' co~\. s s '- o';,e<> I:. ,,1.,,<>
r "p" I:.",e , "e1.0"'"
'e",eo. " s\.l:.e ~e $~1.<;'00'
1. f. "e "s,'-e 1.\.",\.<>",,"1 '" ,,\. "e" -
I:.",e " e<> I:. ,,1.,,<>
o.e "e 1.0"'" "",e<>"",e<> I:. , . <>
_ ~1.,,<> . _c"1.,,I:.'-O ·
, ~",e<>~ r . ~ c'--
o.e"e.Or ",,"\<'-<>~' 0
.0-o.S 'C.O $1~'o'
a). 'C. e 1: a 'C.1- C a 'C.1. 0 -0. ..
~\.<>o".- g s\.$e. 1.0 $~1.<;'00'
"p"\.1. 0.,-<> . <>" e" \. e'" - C"'\. I:. eC
co~\.ss'-o "P"1 I:.",e ""
~"10" - e<>1:. ,,1.,,<>
. o.e"e1.0"":: ,,0.00. 0.
of. s'- I:.e 0. _ $' . I:.",e "po""
~e,,\.e'" e,,\.e'" "po"" 1.,,<> 1:.0
1:."" ,,1. " 1. o"",e<> I:. "
. -e o.e"e . ·
f. s'-~ <;l0 00. co~,-.
~~"e"1. .0 s _ $1. . ~1.,,<> "P"1
.r _",-so" ~",e<>1:. r
s""e- . e o.e"e1.or $1.<;0.00.
. g of. s,-I:. 'so"s - o.e"e
~e",e""'-<> i s""e""'- I:.e s\.l:.e
0" "po""o. 0 f. \.<>co",,,1.e
age!\.'C. 0
~e1ecl:.\.0<> "P"1 - $1.60.00.
,,1."<>' . . ~ I:.e<> aa1"
~ \131- 'C,.'n:\.P , ..1 '
'ecl:.e~ "e",-e~
~e1 '~e p1."<> <;0 00
a ail:.e" S'- aea. $ .
",,",,-genae 1. nO~ be "ef."n ~e project.
f.ee s",..,: 0."<:.0 ,"~1.l\,,~a
1:e<!.\l1-1:e
"pe . of. ",,-g"o" ~~ <-<II'
co-o.o.1.'C.1-o-o. .. $~~~.~~.
, t t1:0~ a pi age-o.t.
,<0" "e 1.,-e "'''\. "e" il:.e" .
" 1."<>o.sc",,e nl:. n"",e "
o o.e"e1.0"",e
, 1:oao. 01:
Cb,,<>ge '- <> ",e <>1:. ,,1.,,<>,
s1.t.e o.e~e).o'Q
~ .. $).~.OO.
ROau
cl.'."'lO.OO.
-o.'C. .. "1<-
De"e1.0"",e . o.e"e1.0"",e<>1:.
). ot S1-'C.e
""",,0"" s
'i'."l:.e<>o.\.<>g o.ef. e" "Cl:.\'o<> 0<> ""
. "equeSI:. 1:.0 \.1:. 0" $o<>,-<>g
G""nl:.,-<>g .,,1. "se pe"""
p1."<>' speC'- - $~<;'OO'
'fi,C ao.t.e
rto a speC:\.
.' . l:.e1."1 - $60. 00.
1no.e;.1--o.1-
..~~9.~"
)..
~.
3.
1\.
~01: s1.'C.e
~01: s1.'C.e
s.
a)
'0)
6.
1 .
<0.
9.
a.)
'0)
g.
'no
~.
~.
1-.
"} .
)..
\ S\l1?
~.
k. Bond inspection for site development plan, for each
inspection after the first bond estimate - $45.00.
1. Zoning clearance - $25.00.
m. Accessory lodging permits - $25.00.
n. Official Letters:
1. Of determination - $60.00.
2. Of compliance with county ordinances- $60.00.
3. Stating number of development rights - $30.00.
o. Sign Permits:
1. Any sign, except exempted signs and signs requir-
ing review by the architectural review board -
$25.00.
2. Signs required to be reviewed by the architectural
review board - $60.00.
In addition to the foregoing, the actual costs of any notice
required under Chapter 11, Title 15.1 of the Code shall be
charged to the applicant, to the extent that the same shall
exceed the applicable fee set forth in this section.
Failure to pay all applicable fees shall constitute grounds
for the denial of any application. For any application
withdrawn after public notice has been given, no part of the
fee will be refunded. (Amended 5-5-82) (Amended 9-1-85)
(Amended 7-1-87) (Amended 6-7-89) (Amended 12-11-91 to be
effective 4-1-92)
(NOTE: SECTION 35.0 WAS AMENDED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO BE
EFFECTIVE 4-1-92)
-229.2-
(Supp. #64, 12-1l-91)
"
IZ,1019/
~l12fRiZd~ .
.~
;i
..
.' ,. ,:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and I t, l~,
Community Development LJ0v~
FROM:
DATE:
September 26, 1991
RE:
STA-91-02 and ZTA-91-08 Fees
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
September 24, 1991, unanimously recommended approval of the
above-noted text amendments. Attached please find a staff
report which outlines this proposal.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
VWC/jcw
. ~
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Planning commission
and~V
FROM:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
Community Development
DATE:
September 17, 1991
RE:
Fee Schedule
Please find attached information regarding fee schedule
changes that have been under review over the past several
months. Specifically, those amendments before you for
action are amendments to Section 18-43, Fees, Chapter 18,
Subdivision of Land and Section 35.0 Fees, and section
4.15.4.1, Sign Permits, Fees of the Albemarle County Zoning
Ordinance (see Attachment II). The remaining is provided as
background and additional information. Staff is
recommending your approval of these amendments.
VWC/jcw
ATTACHMENTS
..
\ATTACHMENT II
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and
Community Development
Amelia M. Patterson, Zoning Administrator~
September 12, 1991
Fee Schedule Review
At the request of the County Executive, the Departments of
Plannning, Zoning and Engineering have reviewed the fees charged
for services related to the subdivision and development of
property. We undertook this review for two reasons: to insure
that our fees better recover the costs incurred in providing
services and to consider adding to the fee schedule services we
currently provide gratis. This review, a most extensive
examination of the County's development fees, revealed that many
of the fees collected fall short of recovering even half the cost
of providing the service. The review also uncovered potential
new sources of revenue in procedures and services we now provide
without charge.
Included in this review are fees derived from the Zoning
Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, County Code and other sources.
The only items before you for action are the fees covered under
the Subdivision and Zoning ordinances; the rest are for your
information.
The following outlines the steps taken to date in this
comprehensive review.
December, 1990: Mailed surveys (Attachment A) to localities
similar to Albemarle County in population and rate of
growth. To insure that we would be comparing fees for
similar services, we described each service in some detail
and listed the departments which work together to provide
the service. The results of this survey are provided in
Attachment B.
January - February, 1991: Studied the time and cost
involved in providing each development-related service to
.
~
Fee Schedule Review
Page 2 of 3
September 12, 1991
determine to what extent our fees reflact the cost involved.
Attachment C reflects this analysis.- 3ervices for which
there is no charge are included on this spreadsheet and are
indicated by shading. The spreadsheet also shows how
changing the rate of recovery would increase the fees
charged.
Hay 21, 1991: Met with representatives of the development
community and citizens' groups to discuss the results of the
survey and the impact of any increases to our fees. While
attendance was sparse, the participants offered many useful
insights. Representatives of the Blue Ridge Homebuilders
expressed concern that raising the fees might make it
impossible for all but the wealthiest developers to develop
their property and suggested two levels of fees for site
plans and rezonings: a lower fee for smaller projects and a
higher one for larger projects. A citizen representing
citizens for Albemarle supported raising the fee if the
increased revenue were used to hire more inspectors,
particularly for soil erosion problems.
Hay 21 - June 4, 1991: Incorporated the suggestion from the
Blue Ridge Homebuilders, revising Attachment C to show two
levels of fees for both site plans and rezonings. For site
plans, we recommended two flat fees, one for residential and
one for non-residential, with an additional charge per unit
of residential development, and per square foot of non-
residential development. We also recommended two fees for
rezonings, based on the acreage of the development.
June 12, 1991: Presented the results of the fee review to
the Board of Supervisors. After some discussion, the Board
deferred this item to its August 14, 1991 meeting in order
to allow staff to revise the recommended increases.
Historically, fees have been set to recover 50% of the costs
of development-related services, with the understanding that
our procedures governing development provide a public
benefit. At its June 12 meeting, the Board expressed a
desire to increase the recovery rate from 50% to either 75%
or 100%, and to subsidize some fees.
June 13 - August 13, 1991: Revised Attachment C to reflect
new direction from Board of Supervisors. While our
recommended fees now reflect a cost recovery of 100%, we
have also supplied the figures for a cost recovery of 75%,
should the increase in fees be phased.
~
Fee Schedule Review
Page 3 of 3
September 12, 1991
In response to the Board's request that we further review
fees charged for services t~~t benefit the public primarily
and subsidize these fees at a standard rate of 50% of the
cost, we identified four areas of possible subsidy. The
first was the fee charged for special use permits for mobile
homes since they serve a Comprehensive Plan goal by
providing low- and moderate-cost housing. We recommended
that fees for these special use permits be subsidized at a
50% cost recovery, which equals $35. (The current fee is
$25.) We further recommended that this fee be standard,
whether the special use permit is handled administratively
or sent to public hearing, to avoid penalizing citizens
whose requests for mobile homes raise objections from their
neighbors. We also recommended that fees be waived when
special use permits for mobile homes are requested due to
emergencies such as the loss of a home to fire.
We also recommended subsidizing the fees charged for
establishing agricultural/forestal districts to recover only
50% of the costs. Since the current fee is only $50, this
recommendation would result in an increase to $150. We
further recommended charging no fee for additions to and
renewal of existing agricultural/forestal districts. This
is in part due to the impracticality of collecting fees for
additions and renewals.
We also recommended that fees for Comprehensive Plan
amendments be subsidized to recover only 50% of the cost.
Currently, there is no fee; we recommended charging $315.
The proposed fee reflects only the cost of review up to the
point when the Board passes a resolution of intent to
approve the amendment.
The last fees we recommended subsidizing were those charged
for amendments to the Albemarle County Service Authority
jurisdictional area in case of emergencies. We recommend
charging nothing for emergencies and $70 for all other
requests to amend the jurisdictional boundaries. currently,
there is no fee for any of these requests.
August 14, 1991: Revised recommendations presented to the
Board of Supervisors. It was decided that enacting any
increase in the fees would be postponed until January 1,
1992.
l'
- Attachment A
KEY Department participating in review.
1
P Planning Department; reviews for planning and design standards,
compliance with landscaping section of Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision
Ordinance and guidelin~s of Comprehensive Plan.
Z zoning Department; reviews uses, parking, setbacks, bulk regulations,
etc., for compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
E Engineering Department; reviews calculations and performance standards
for roads, drainage, stormwater detention. Also reviews measures
required by the soil erosion and runoff control ordinances.
BI Fire Officer. Reviews for compliance with fire code and handicapped
access.
(x) Department sometimes participates in review.
Service
Departments
Tour
Fee
uur
Fee
lIme
Req'd
I. Special Use Permits
=====================================================================================================================
A. Mobile Home
8. Home Occupation 8 (req'd if using an
accesory structure or employees other
than family members under same roof)
C. Rural Area Divisions
(req'd to subdivide less than 21
acres after 5 small lot divisions
have been exhausted; also required
for rural preservation subdivisions
if over 20 lots)
D. Commercial uses allowed only by SP
Includes day care, schools, radio towers
E. Industrial uses allowed
only by SP.
F. Private club/recreational
fad l ity.
G. Public Utilities
H. Grade/Fill in the
Floodplain.
I. All other uses
(includes churches)
II. Amendments to the text of the
Zoning Ordinance
I I I. Amendments to the Zoning Map
A. For Planned Developments
B. All other Zoning Map Amendments
$ 25
30-60 days (P) Z
25
30-60 days (P) Z (E) (81)
165
71-94 days P Z E
165 71-94 days P Z (E) (BI)
165 71-94 days P Z E (BI)
165 71-94 days P Z (E) (BO
130 71-94 days P Z (E)
100 71-94 days P Z E
100 71-94 days P Z E
65 120 days P Z
520+ 71/120 days p Z E BI
$1/acre
165+ 71/120 days p Z (E)
..
2
Service
Our
Fee
Time
Req'd
Departments
Your
Fee
========================================================================================================================
IV. Site Plans
A. Preliminary Site Plans
(optional for developer; includes
review by the Planning Commission;
intended as a feasibility study:
detailed plans for water, sewer
facilities, drainage, grading and
road plans are not required at this
this stage.)
$520
50 days P Z E BI
B. Final Site Pla~s
1. APpro~' 'aoministratively if
if su itted within six months
after ,site plan approved, unless
Planning Commission asks to
review final site plan.
260
17+
days
P Z E BI
2. If reviewed by Planning commission
a. before approval of a
preliminary plan
720
50 days
P Z E 81
b. after approval of a
preliminary plan
300
50 days
P Z E BI
C. Site Development Plan ~aiver
granted by Planning Commission if it
determines that any improvement req'd
by the Zoning Ordinance does not serve
the public interest, or that an alter-
native proposed by a developer would
satisfy the purpose of the Ordinance.
130
50 days
P Z (E) (BI)
D. Amendments to Site Plans
1. Minor: alterations to parking 30 5/50 days P Z E BI
circulation, building size, location.
handled administratively.
2. Major: requires review by 130 50 days P Z E BI
Planning commission.
V. Subdivision Plats
A. Preliminary Plats
1. 3 lots or less 65 50 days P Z E
2. 4 lots or more 260 50 days P Z E
B. Final Plats
1. Requiring Commission approval 390+ 50 days P Z E
$l/lot
2. Administrative approval, 30 5 days 'p Z E
including family divisions
3. Exempt plat 15 5 days P Z
4. Condominium plat 65 5 days P Z E 81
C. ~aiver of subdivision requirements 65 50 days P Z (E)
D. Relief from conditions by Planning 65 50 days P (Z) (E) (81)
Commission on plat or plan
"
.J
service
Our
Fee
Time
Req'd
Your
Fee
Departments
VI. Erosion Control Plan Review
75
===============================================================================================================
VII. Runoff Control Plan Review
(Ordinance for the protection of public
water supply impoundments)
1. For site plans/subdivision plat& -0-
2. For single-family residences -0-
VII I. Vari ances
65
IX. Appeals
A. Of Zoning Administrator's decision 25
B. Of Planning Commission's decision
-0-
X. Inspections
A. For bonding estimates -0-
B. Roads -0-
C. Erosion Control 25
D. Field visits to gather information -0-
for variances, other staff reports.
XI. Sign Permit v 20
XII. letters of Determination -0-
In some circumstances, the Zoning
Administrator determines whether property
in question is a separate parcel entitled
to development rights, based on deeds,
plats, and other documentation provided
by the property owner. The Zoning Admini-
strator verifies this documentation and pro-
vides a letter stating the number of property
rights held by the parcel.
XIII. letters of Compliance -o-
At the request of the property owner or
lending institution, the Zoning Administrator
researches an existing development and provides
a letter stating that the property complies
with County zoning regulations.
XIV. preliminary Conferences -0-
Property owners and private planning firms
are encouraged to meet with County staff
before submitting a site plan and applica-
tions for zoning text or map amendments and
special use permits.
30 days P
E
15 days E
5 days E
28 days (P) Z
28 days (P) Z
60/ P Z
75 days
day -
E
.',t.
1 day E
1 day E
1 day P Z E BI
10 days (P) Z BI
10 days Z
10 days (P) Z
P Z E BI
"
4
Service
Departnnets
Your
Fee
Our
Fee
Time
Req'd
===================================================================================================================
XV. Review by the Architectural Review Board
Needed for all development along designated
entrance corridors, except for single-family
homes.
XVI. Building Permits
Includes review of permits for single-family
homes to insure that property owner meets
zoning regulations and any necessary runoff
and erosion control measures. will include
review to insure that property owner complies
with the Chesapeake Bay regulations, if adopted
by this County.
XVI I. Bonding
Includes maintaining bond files, sending
letters of renewal and providing lists of
bonds and expiration dates to developers
upon request. (Inspections for bond
estimates and completion of necessary
improvements included under "X. Inspections")
XVIII. Zoning Clearances
Needed for new businesses and businesses
changing ownership or location.
XIX. Home Occupations. Class A
May be granted instead of a Home Occupation
Class B if applicant has no employees other
than family members living in the house in
which the business is to be.
-0-
60 days
P Z E BI
P Z
-0-
Z days
P Z
-0-
varies
Z
-0-
1 day
Z
-0-
1 day
I\) . :- .. ... 'il
I !1J ?> :- ::x: ~ :n rn !=l 0 ?>
(J) N !1J C/) ...................,.. m
<l> 0 N 0 ()
'0 0 "T1 0 :D ~ :;- ~ '0 :::::::::::::::::::::;
I <l> 0 :7 "T1 "'0 <l> () :D iil ::r ~ m
~ :7 < Q ::l 2, [ c 0 :C' Q. 0 C '" 0 0
~ ~ "'0 5' ::l ~ !2: CD III C 3 ~ '" 3 sr. ~ en
0 iil lC lC 5' ~ CD ~ 3 01 CD ~ ....................,.
'0 '0 > ......................
3 ::l -l iil ~ o' () ~ CD 0 C ()
s:: n iil ::r :;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;
CD ::l (l) :i' ::l c- o 0 In
<l> I\) ?i ~ III 0 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
::l Q. !2. CT c .. c 3 CD :c
U; '0 0;' '" "0 CD ......................
)> )> .. CD C 0 ~ "'0 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: )>
3 '" :C' "'0 (l) .:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:
3 CD 0;' 0' Cl> 3 I
(l) (l) 5' ::l ~. :D
::l ::l ::l ~
a. a. .. G)
3 3
(l) (l) m
::l ::l 0
(ij (ij
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... z .... .... OJ
Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul g: Ul Ul Ul > 0 g: -<
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :wI~
...'..,i)
'Z':':':':',' .: r
I 0
()
)>
.... ~ ~ z .... z z z .... .... .... z I\:!I r
> 0 > > > - 0 I\) >
0 0 0 0 Ul -I
0 0 0 0
,:,:,:::::::,:!:):: m
:::::::iI::g[
t~;r~~~~~~~;j;~~ en
I en
.... ~ .... z .... .... .... .... z .... .... ~
-oJ 0 > -oJ 0 -oJ -oJ > -oJ -oJ
Ul 0 Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul -
0 r
+ )>
~
- :{t{~ :D
[
I -I
.... z .... ~ z .... ~ z ~ z .... ~ 0
I\) > I\) > 0 > > 0 )>
Ul g: 0 0 8 0
0 0 0 0
+ r
.... ~,.8." OJ
I\) ::::::,:::::::tD,:
~ ::::::::::::::~:: m
::::::::::::::::::::::
0 ~
)ttm~~~m~
I )>
:D
r
m
~[~~~ffI~~j~j
'" Ul 01 - .... .... '" '" .... .... .... z z ~ IIIII~
Co> 0 ~ 0 Co> ~ ~ ~ Co> Co> Co> > >
g: + III 0 0 0 0 0
III - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 iil ~..i'
:.... l!O .. R\':...}
....
Ol Ul Q ,,::::::::{O
0 0 ;:::;:;:;:;:::;:;:P.:
0 III iO' \,\:\:\11'\,1\,
0 '"
~ !!1.
....
~ I\)
0 0
0 0 I
.... .... .... '" z .... .... .... '" z '" z
~ ~ ~ Co> > Co> Co> Co> Co> > Co> >
Ul g: Ul 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::0::::::0::
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :I]::::B;
+
~ I!!!:!II!!!!I::
0
iii'
0
iil I
z z z '" '" z .... .... '" z z '"
> > > g: g: > g: g: g: > > w
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
::::::::::,:::0.:
:::::::::,:::,~:
......................
.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:
;:::::::::::::::::::::
.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
'" ~ '" '" '" '" z '" z '" z II
Ul Ol 0 Ol Ol > Ol > - >
-oJ 0 I\) I\) I\) I\) N
Ul Ul ClD ClD ClD ClD Ul
+
'" :tt}:g:,
g I
III
0
iil
'" (;0 ~ '" to '" z to ~ to '" z z z z to '"
~ ~ I\) > I\) N > > > > I\)
N 0 - 0 N 8 N 8 ~ 8 N 8
I 0 I\) 0 ~ ~ ~ :J::;
Ul
... I + + + + r1"
~ .... + ~ ~ ~ ~ I
0 Ol ~ r1"
iii' I\) ~ Ul ~ ~ ~ III
0 Ul III iii' III
iil + 0 0 0 0 0 ()
iil iil iil iil iil ::r
S
.... :7 - ~ ~ '" z ~ .... ~ ~ z '" ~ CD
-oJ ~ 0 ~ > -oJ I\) -oJ ~ > 0 ~
ClD CD Ul 8 Co> Ul Co> ClD 8 ::1
Ol ::l I\) ~ Ol Co> 8 Co> I!::!I r1"
Ul + 0 0 0 0
0 Co> I
(;0 III 0 ~
ClD Q Q -oJ ::,:,,:,:,::,;:ii:: tJj
0 w
iii' CD :7 8
.. ......................
0 CD :.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
iil ::::;:::::::::::::::::
......................
~ ~ ~ .... '" '" '" '" '" ~ z '" '" :t'hd
;;; Co> Co> 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ Ul
-oJ 0 -oJ -oJ -oJ -oJ -oJ -oJ ~ gtg)
10 0 -oJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 C1l
0 + 0 + + + + + + III!:I:
+ .... + ~ .... '" '" .... '"
.... (; '" Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul
Ol Ol ~ ~ Ul Ul Ul ~
~ iii' Ul iii' iii' iii'
iii' III :}}}~
0 III Q Q 0 Q 0 Q
0 iil 0 iil iil
iil CD CD CD CD .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;
.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
"'0
III
co
CD
'" . ::: :::: :<
I ~
(f) 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~
~ m CD ~ ~ !'> !'> en
'0 Jl ~ "T1 -0 c:: !'> !'> ~
I 0 ~ .D :I> ~ "T1 -0
~ =, I>> C) !:r 5: -0 5' ~ '" i 0" 3 5' i CD
C/l [ <' 0 0 !2. a. s:: s:: I>> -0 :I>
CD i5' 9: 3' ~ <' Q. !2.
0' ~ ::> '" 3 ;C' I>> 5' ::> 0 3' "0
:J ~ 3 Q. 3 5' -0 0; '" 5' Cii' "Q' g Q. ~ 3 i>>
0 '" ~ 0 :a Jl [ g g 3 5' 5'
"0 3 ~. '" I>> o' :J
::> < -.:;: '" ~. I>> C/l
i>> C) 0; ~ a;' 3 g: -0 :J ;a ~ .:;:
:J 0 :e 0 C/l
::> <' Cil Ul [ <'
go '" '"
(5'
::>
Ul
~
01
o
~
o
~~Z(f)~
00> I>> ~
~ !?
(f)
I>>
3
'"
~
S!!
[
~
o
~
o
~
o
~~
00
~ Z *~* Z Z
> 001""" > >
0 g 0
0 0
0 +
0
0
.p
?*
~
01
o
..
..
:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.
::!:!!:!!!::!!::::!:l:
11,1111,11111,,111,\
III~III
:~tif
:,:,:.:,:,:,:1
tr~ls~~
t~ltffl~~
......................
......................
I
::::::::::::::~::
~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~; ~~~~~~~ ~
I
I
1:::1
::::::::::::::l:D::
::~~~~:~:~::::m~~
.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.;.:
I
I~:!II
\1\\\1
6::'~'
~d::tEf
:z..~'
wii5
;:;:;:;:;:;:;:M;i:
:::!:!:!::::2:!
I
:III
$~:~:f~:f
I
~::::::~
::::~:~:~:::~:~
::::::::::::::n:
;:;:;:::;:;:::;:;:;:;:
;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::
......................
}mt~~tt~
IIIII
:~~::t~~~~~
:.:.:.;.:.;.;.:.:.;.:.
;:::::;:;:::;:::;:::::
!Illl!!
:{il?~::
:~t~
I
1:1111
:;:;=;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;
:~:~:;:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~
I
.......~
:::::::::::::1
::::::;:::::::::::::::
::;:::;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:
~
o
*
o
Z
>
Z
>
Z
>
ZZ
>>
Z
>
Z
>
* ~ *
'" '" '"
8g~
p) ~
" '"
3 c
I>> 0'
)( Q.
~ ;C'
Jl~
'" I\)
'" '"
-, 01
g. +
::> ~
::-. f\)
I>> 0
- -
9:
C)~
o I\)
3 '"
3 01
'" :.
<> ~
1>>_-'
~
"
~~ ~~
0000
ZZ
>>
(f)
I>>
3
'"
Z
);
~
I\)
01
+
~
-
9:
&'
3
'"
~ ~ ~ Z~~ Z ~
'" 0 0 _1\)1\) >
01 :I> 01 01 0
+ 0
~ +
01 ~
::::,
!? g
9:
*
~
+
~
g
[
~ ~
o I\)
01
+ ~
~I\)
01
~&'
o Ul
- '"
Q
I\)
i5'
0;
(f)
I>>
3
'"
~
I\)
01
+
~
-
I>>
"
ZZ ~Z~Z
>> 0>l!J>
+
4It
S!!
9:
~
l!J
+
~
~
!?
&'
3
'"
~
01
o
ZZ~~Z
>>:1> >
~*
~OI
~o
3 +
-, ~
::> """
, 0
~~
"
&'
3
'"
Oi'~w~"
+ ~ I Rl ~
O"-l~U11O
;+g,+r;;
-""cn,-,,_
c.n-....o
- o-
s: ~ ~
l::
5:
~
o
Z&,&,&,~
>33301
'" '" '" +
4It
~
!?
~
"-I
o
+
~
01
:::.
!?
&'
3
'"
Z
);
o ~
- I\)
-00>
-0
~ I
g' 6
co ~
Z
o
-l
C)
o
s::
-0
:I>
Jl
:I>
OJ
Z~~~""Z
);ooom>
+
~
:::!
[
Z
o
-l
C)
o
s::
-0
:I>
Jl
:I>
OJ
~
Co>
~
01
+
~
S!!
9:
(f)
I>>
3
'"
Z
>
ZZ
>>
Z
>
~
I\)
01
*
o
"T1
g,
"T1
5'
e.
"T1
'"
CD
~
o
ZZ
>>
Z
>
~
I\)
o
ZZ
>>
Z
>
~~
II> lii
~ '"
II>
::t
~
~
I\)
o
o
~
I\)
01
z
>
4It
l!J
o
+
*
~
~
"
~
l!J
o
+
""
01
o
in"
"
~
Co>
"-I
o
""
'"
"-I
o
~
I\)
0>
o
., - .. ...
o~og;
o !!!, 0 OJ
+ Q. + I>>
~~""'"
__.....CD
g iO g
I\)';:C
01 :l
o -.
o -
'"
~
?
Z~Jl~
g l!J g: l!J
I + c: +
;...CD.fIt
'" 01 ::> 01
~~!:2
::> 0
e.o
!2.il
?
Z4It
o 0:>
::> '"
I "-I
Cil +
'" *
c:~
'" -
.::> I>>
_. n
l!!.
~ ~
10
01 +
l::
~~
Ul ~
'"
~~
01\)
001
*~
0:> 0:>
"-II\)
00
+ +
"" 4It
"""~
gS!!
Q. II>
C "
~
o
o
+
~
I\)
o
in"
n
""
~
~
o
+
""
I\)
o
in"
n
z
!?
C)
o
3
"
I>>
iL1
0'
(p
*
o
."
m
m
en
()
::r:
)>
JJ
(i)
m
o
OJ
-<
r
o
()
;po
r
-
-I
m
en
en
s:
r
)>
JJ
-I
o
)>
r
OJ
m
s:
)>
:D
r
m
'll
I>>
Cl
'"
I\)
;;; x x x x ~ ~ ~ ?< ;;< :S :S "Tl
I ~ :S . :< :< .......h.
en !=' 0 ~ ?> ~ ?> m
ct> 0 en 5' )>- !'> ~
'0 :IJ r "T\ m :c OJ Q :IJ
1 lJl ""0 r CD iD' en Q "0 < '" "tl m
lJl CD ~ CD ~ (D' 0 0 0 "0 ~ c:
~ 0 c: < ~ CD :J is: '" I>> :> ~ "tl N '0 ~ i>> :J (J)
CD 3 0. 0. CD :> ...........
:J Ci (ii' ""0 5' rn 0 0 n> iii' ?' -0 g ...........
a. 3 '"' (j) < :> m :>
5' 5' ~ en 5' CD ~: ~ 6' 5' (jj :J iil [ ()
3 n (") ~IrjI~~~fj
lC lC 0' :J Q. !a Q. Qj 0 3' :J cc CD rn ""0
""0 '< n> ~ I>> en )> en a: iii' :c
'"' 6' en CD
CD )>- '< () Q. en ?- ~ :J )>
3 :IJ () 0 :J rn
lJl 0 3 [ JJ
- :J "E.
ro iii' (i)
(i) :J
(") m
:J CD IIIIII1
(") CJ
CD
.... .... .... .... .... ~ ~ .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... OJ
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -ol -ol 0 0 -<
0 C1l C1l wf~
1I11I1III111111 r
0
()
I~'..I )>
.... z z .... .... .... z ~ .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... r
0 0 ); 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0
5' 5' it;::c:i:; -I
0' 0' ::;:::;:::::;:;:);: m
ttf~6:;
:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:1:; (J)
~1t~~~~t~~I~j
I (J)
.... ~ z ~ ~ ~ OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ s:
0 0 ); 0 0 0 III 0 0 0 ); -ol -ol
'" C1l C1l
<l> r
0.
0 )>
::l
'" JJ
c' Illl:I:::I!II!I
::l -I
<
e:- O
~ ~ z .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ - ~ ~ z z :ri:Mi
0 ); 0 0 I>) 0 0 0 0 0 '" - ); ); )>
0 C1l c: 0 0 :O::::::c:i:;
+ () 0 0 :ll5.;
() ~ r
~ CD iil ~,:,:~,: OJ
- rn i:
rn rn ;:;:::;:;:;:;:m::
..Q ~ ::l ::::::::::::::~:: m
? 0. [I~II~@t
<l> s:
0. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:
I )>
JJ
r
m
:::::;:;:;:;::al:;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;;~~~~;~
~;r~;m;~;tr
.... z .... ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~ .... ~ ~ ~ f€' .... :~::l;
0 ); 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I>)
0 0 0 0 3 C1l
::::. ~.l
+ <l> g,
~
~ 0 I!!::g
'" ~
..Q c.>
? 0 :::JJ:11::
0
3 ~~IltIl
~
:::::1:1:1:::::::1:1::
~ ~ z ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ :; .... z ~ ~ .... ~ :bm~
0 0 ); 0 ); 0 c.> 0 () 0 ); 0 ;:0;:;:;:0;:
C1l 0 0
1: 0 0 ::c:i:;:;:;""':
+ 0. iJ:@
2 <l>
0.
? 5'
() :::::::::::::::::;:;::
0 ::::::::::::::::::;:::
rn .:.:.:.;.;.:.:.:.:.;.:
Qj ::::::::::::::::::::;:
~ ~ .... Z Z ~ ~ .... .... ~ .... Z ~ .... en .... :f!iJg
0 0 0 ); ); 0 0 ~ 0 0 ); I>) I>> ~
C1l 0 3 R',','.....
0 0 <l> " :;;;;:;::;:;~g
,:.:.:,:,:,:,:K:
~~mtt;~t;~~
~:~:;:~:;:;:;:~:;:~:;:
...........
~ ~ .... .... tr .... ~ ~ :21<
0 0 0 III ""
C1l rn 0 0 0 R':t~
CD C1l C1l
0. I .:.:,:,:,:.:.:0)
0 ~ ;;:;;;;;;;;;;;111;;
::l ~ tt:rl;;
'" :;:;:;:;:;:::~
..Q
? :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
......................
.... ~ z .... .... - + .... .... ~ ~ .... .... .... .... .... .... :6:::$
0 0 I>) i\) - 0 0 I>) 0 I>) 0 0
C1l ); C1l C1l .... ~ I>) C> :i.:!I!~
"" 0 0
+ ~
~ !!1.
0 ,.,. 1\\\\\\:1:\\
i-> 0 I>)
~ 0 0
0
rn 0
..Q
? < 1111';1
!2.
z .... z .... .... .... .... ~ .... .... .... .... ~ .... Z
); I>) ); 0 0 0 I>) 0 0 0 0 I>) c.> I>) 0
C1l 0 C1l C1l C1l
0 0 0 -I 1:1111
n
0
i:
"tl
)>
:c IIIIII
)>
tXl
~ .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ .... .... .... .... z
0 0 0 0 I>) I>) 0 0 0 0 0 I>) -ol C1l I>) );
C1l C1l C> -ol -ol C1l
0 0 0 ;o;:;:::m;:
fii:::i;
:I::I::~
...,
III
cc
<l>
c.>
;;; X
I ..
f/) ~
Cl>
'tl
1 :I:
~ 0
3
CD
??
(")
c:
"0
!!i
(5'
::l
CIl
~
{jOt
I\)
(l'I
;1
II
~I
..,...':~
:::::::::::::Q~
~I
~I
:tttIl
~ttrtf~
I
I
{jOt ::~::?:@@
o '" ",',,,,,
:~il::i::
:~t:~::
lId
::;:;:::::;::=
IItlf'::
~I
00::::::::::::::
~I
I
:::::::::::::'l~r
.......,~#
1:I,IIII,:,I!I,:I!lil\!
~ ... ..:;p
:. :::::_~~
kIf.~
~I
~::::::g::
....... -,
:::::::::::;::...:;
;:::::;:;:::::::;:;:;:
;:;:::::;:;:;:::::;:;:
~111:11
.c'.,~:
I::::~~' ~:
......... .
............. "
:::::::t::~
~fm;~;~~~~~1~~~~~
{jOt
o
z
);
{jOt
o
{jOt
o
z
);
{jOt
o
{jOt
o
{jOt
o
"T1
m
m
en
()
:r:
)>
:D
G>
m
CJ
OJ
-<
r
o
()
)>
r
-
-i
-
m
en
en
s:
-
r
)>
:D
-i
o
)>
r
OJ
m
s:
)>
:D
r
m
:'tl
..
CD
CD
.,.;.
z
,0
-l
IT!
0(')
o 0
(\) (/)
(/) Cii
:l _.
o :l
-Q.
5' c:
Q.o.
c: (\)
a.(/)
(\) (/)
o D>
< ~
(\)
3- ~'
(\) D>
D> :l
0.0.
o
... ...
g 5'
!e~
(/) 0'
o (\)
-:l
() (\)
o :::
~Cii
~ 2-
~ (/)
m~
-'0
Q 0
-, (/)
ro-ill
3co
(/) (\)
:l D>
~5.
(/) D>
c: a.
0'<
3 ~
ro- in'
a.(\)
3
QCD
D> 2
'0
'2.
C:;'
a
0'
?
~ :J: P :-n rn !=' 0 !JJ ?> en
'0
~ 0' ill ~ 0 () 0 1" :-" 1" -" ~
G) " :l 5' D> :l (') :Il :J: s:
0 0 iil c: Q, <' -< a. (i) -< 0 c: " )> 0 " )> 0 ~
a. Q: c: 3 ~ 3 Q:
::T '2. a. -< D> 0' 0' (')'0 (')'0
(\) C:;' (i) '< ~ (/) '< 3 Qo~ (\) Qo~ r0- c::
~ D> =: (") )> (/)
5' ~ (") en ~ ';j en (\) ... 0 0 CD~ :J: (\)
c: C " 0 ." () (\) CD < (") 0
(/) 5' c: 0 ~ D> 0 ~ (") 0 ~ "
(\) 0' 3
(/) .... Vl fn 5' 0 en c: en (\)
::T (i)' (\) '0 (\) ...
(i) (") c: D> D> ~,
(\) Vl (") Vl iil c Vl <' :Il a. a :Il a.
(i) ~ a. a. (\) in' (\) 3 o' (\) 3 (ii
(/) o' < <
a 0' o' (\) (i)' ;5' :l (i)' ;5'
Vl ~ :l
o' ~ 0' a. 0' Vl ~ (') ~
(\) ill
:l a. ~ D> ~
~ (\) '< (/)
(\) Vl
in a. CD
-..J
0:>
o
0>
(0
o
0:>
-0
o
0:>
-0
o
0:>
-0
o
-..J
0:>
o
(0
(0
o
01
0> Co)
00
I\)
o Co)
00
1\)1\)
0101
-00:>
Co) Co)
Co) Co)
0101
01 01 ~ 0> 0> 01 -..J ~ -0
0:> I\) -" -0 0:> ~ I\) I\) 01 I\)
01 0 0 0 0 01 01 0 01 0 01
5'
a.
C:;'
D> -..J 0> 0:> 0:> 0:> -..J (0 01 I\)
r0- o:> (0 -0 -0 -" 0:> (0 0> Co) 0 Co)
Vl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:l
(\)
~
CD
(\)
!'l
o
o
-0
0>
01
1\)1\)
0101
o
o
Co)
o
0>
01
0>
01
0>
01
Co)
-0
~
I\)
o
-..J
0:>
~Co)
I\)
o
-0
0>
I\)
-0
-..J
0:>
o
0>
(0
o
0:>
-0
o
0:>
-0
o
0:>
-0
o
-..J
0:>
o
(0
(0
o
Co) Co)
0101
00
:Il
(\)
.D
c:
~.
(\)
(/)
D>
a.
~
o'
:l
~
(\)
:l
co
5'
(\)
~
5'
co
...
(\)
<
(i)'
~
sa.
';j
~
iil
c:
C:;'
(")
D>
o
c:
~
o'
:l
!'l
5' 5' :J:
D> D>
:l(O:l
(00.
~9~
~Co)D>
D>-..Jo.
~ ~ 3
(") sa. 5'
~~~
o (t) ~
_ Vl <'
(ft(l)(\)
~ ~ -<
0:> ... c:
'0 ~. :l
~ Cii r0-
ll.> :IE g:
'0 (I) D>
'2.(i):l
C:;' ';j D>
~Sl)S:
o' :l 0
? ~ 5'
(\) :l
a. co
~~
~. .g
2. (\)
Vl ;::.
~'<
ll.> 0
::::~
< :l
~~
-... 0
(\) 0'
Vl _.
5..~
g.1ii
co
:T5'5':J:
(\) D> D>
~:l(05.
g~~~
!eiil~D>
C/l co a.
!!!. (I) ~ 3
:l (") sa. 5'
2g:T!a:
3 (\) ~
;C/l~
0-(1) <'
g ~'O (\)
(1)0(1)-<
g-'O 3 5
3~==O:ro-
(\) \1l C/l (/)
(/) '0 :IE (/)
C/l'O(I)\1l
(\)=(i):l
<2';j\1l
(\)::::\1lo.
D>O:lO'
(') ? a. 5'
~:Il~~'
~~~'O
(\) 0 3 0
~ 3 5''0
:l 3 -, ~
~.~~:c
<o.D>o
(I) :::: ~
:2~~:l
~g-:.<~
co 0:...0
o ;;1' rn .Q:
~5'C:~
. co Cii
'0 :l .
\1lCO
;::.
sa.
::::::::::~:::::j:::::: :0
::?::::::;i;:::?=':} m
'::::::::::::e::::::::::::l:8
:i:rrrrrrr: s:
mIIml:::::IIm s:
::):f:):i::f:::) m
:)))j:):'::::)): Z
j:))jff'))::) 0
ii,:::i::ii:!li:i:'i::'::i::i:i::'~
:::::)))):::i:::::: ."
:?:::::::t:,:?:'::::::::: m
::::ttttt::tt m
tt:tttt::::r: (f)
:i:::'tt:::::::rr::: )>
ffff::'::t:':f': Z
::1:'::11::::1::::':: 0
tt:::'::j::':'jttt' -f
:j:::::':j:tt)iif :r:
j:::::::trtr't:r m
11111111:: ()
:::r:::::I::III:::: 0
:i:::!:!:i:i:~::::I:~
j;k:~1:2: (f)
:::::i:::I:':II:::'::II::1 Sfi
::::tt:i:t:::g:: "U
l:i::~::::li~
:t::r:I:i::I::::I <
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 0
':'::::::::il~::,il:~
9:Jt.,,.,,
'1il>o..""" (f)
:~:::f~t::2 m
g::::Sr:~t: :0
:::::l:::::::t::tm: <
111111111\1111111\11111111: rn
:::::11:::::::'11::
::t:It:tj::"S::
',',",','.'.""'."3"
1t1t:::::::::~':
:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:::::,:,:,:z.:,
lili:;::,::I'
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
..................................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
:i::il::i:i!~i:::1
iiljJ.~Jst
.................
.................
::::::::::::~:
Ii
.......'O"~'
1::::$16::
~
rt
rt
Pi
()
::r
s
CD
::l
rt
n
"0
D>'
co-
(I)
:2
o
-l
ro
0(')
o 0
(I) en
en Iii
:l
sa 5-
!2
:l e
!2o.
e (I)
a. en
(I) en
o III
< er
~ (ii'
~en
(I) III
III :l
0.0.
o _
... ...
(") 5'
Oeo
en (I)
iiiO'
2. ~,
g ~
:l Iii
CD
co 2-
:l en
m~
-'0
Q 0
_, en
ii>IU
3eo
en (I)
:l III
~5.
en III
e a.
0'<
3 ~
- 00'
~~
0'(1)
; ~
'0
'Q.
C')'
a
o'
?
:l
a.
C')'
III
ii>
en
:l
(I)
~
CD
(I)
!/l
.
o en
:l ~ ~
-g~ii>
... III 0
(") en (I)
~w<
a.~
0.-8
:l: 3
~(I)
:l
:l -
eo -0
iiJ
:l
:E
III
<'
(I)
...
o
!='
2.~
u ~
CD '
= III
3:g
'0 ...
_0
III <
:l ~
I\)
~
(]I
~
w
o
0>
o
I\)
~
(]I
~
0>
o
I\)
~
(]I
!l'
2.0'
'0 (I)
... 0'
~CD
3' III
'0
'0'0
iiJ(3
:l <
~
0>
W
o
w
o
o
~
CXl
0>
W
o
~
'-.I
(]I
0>
W
o
(0
o
o
"'-l
I\)
o
CXl
o
(0
o
o
0>
"'-l
(]I
(0
o
o
!"
::;;
CD
<
(ii'
:l:
(I)
a.
0'
'<
-0
(')
!Jl
"T1
> 5'
'0 ~
~ en
~ ~
0.-0
III iiJ
o.:l
3 en
5'
w
I\)
(]I
I\)
0>
o
CXl
'0
w
I\)
(]I
:2::D
o (I)
:l en
'0:
CD (I)
!!1. :l
po g.
~~
~(O
I\)~
8 (]I
I\)
~
(]I
w
I\)
(]I
o.o.::D
(I) (I) (I)
< < (")
(I) ~ 0
0' 0 3
~~g
(I) (I) :l
aa.c..
~~~
~~
....LQ)~
O:l_
'0 III (I)
~ ~ ~
o=~
ogc.g
0~U'1
.ll (") 0'
e ~...
w ~ ~
CD ~ m
~2.~
;~~
-oe?.
:l '0 III
o (I) :l
=r ... a.
... e ~
(I) :l ~
5:;:;:~
(1)2.0
:l ... _
::-. (I) 0
~ !!1. ;;
o.g.o
~ a =r
~~CD
'0 5:
3 CD
2.. a
~
:<
?"~
-oii>
~-o
3 ~
:l en
III
-<
~
ii>
-0
iiJ
:l
en
~
I\)
0>
o
0'1
I\)
o
~
~
(0
~
0'1
~
I\)
0>
o
!Jl
~
o
:;.
(I)
...
?">
0"T13
(I) 0 (I)
~ ... :l
0'-00.
'0 iiJ 3
3 5 ~
~~Iii
en 0"
:;.
(I)
N
o
:l
5'
eo
~
III
'0
N
o
:l
:l
eo
~
III
'0
CXl
~
0'1
I\)
0'1
0'1
0>
(]I
+
~
....
-.
III
(") 0'1
CD I\)
o
I\)
o
e
:l
a.
CD
...
0'1
o
III
(")
:....
~
CXl
....
0'1
~
....
Ole
O:l
+ a.
III CD
(") ...
:....0'1
~o
....Ill
1\)(")
0'1:....
(J1~
CXl
....
0'1
0>
....
o
(0
~
o
~
0'1
....
I\)
0'1
0'1
O_Ill_o.::D
- 00' (I)
(J1CDO(") <
o CD a. g (ii'
~ 2. (I) ... ~
~;~~~
Q(J1~:;.5.
3g~~.m
~CDge!!1.
g*~~
5' !i ~ iiJ
~ ~ ~ ~
2- = cO (l)S,
if$~'~
(('032.
:;. III 0 III
~ CD CD :g
Ula:T=
0_ III (")
Q)::T:J2t
~~O'g
enN;:;'O
~~,giiJ
o.:l<?
~!!:l (I)
.... ao
I\)~ 0,0
8l~~~
0' III ~ ~
... 0 CD
CD 3 ::: ~
::: g S' 0
:l :l eo
~. a. !/l
en
:- :I::iIJ~:::IIi: JJ
~ 11:,11,1:111:11:",:1:111"'8
N a. ::mm::m:::m:mmIt s:
J-I iii:::I!I:i::::!:!:::::::::!:I:I' ~
i~III\,IIII:IIII,III,IIIIII:III',!:, ~
~ CD :mmItttII::: 0
g ~ :m:m:::::m:rrrr: ."
:t:ttt:tt:::t m
::I:::::i:I:I:::::i:I:::!:I:I:I:!: rn
:iIIIIIiI:Iii )>
:rmr:::rr:::r:::: Z
::ti{{I{:!{::::: 0
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .....!
'1I,II,',!I",:..::,:'I:I'll......,~
ml~
m.~
:t::i:t::::::::::::t:{ 0
l'I,lil'~,:I:11 ~
,~::,:" ":":..7.': C/)
:iI::'::::::. m
.... ......,.'sr-<O} JJ
o id::::::m:::::!:i: <
1,I,I:I:::II',I:I:I:III"I'm
::II!I:IIIIII1I:I:I::I::II!:
:::::::::::::i:::::::::::g::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::;:)::
0> "',."'....'m'...Q:.
ffi I::::I:::::~:
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..... ............
.................
':':':':':':':':':':':':'_:
~.
ffi :ft:~::e:::~:.
.............. .
.................
............"...
.................
..................................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
~~~~~~~I~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~ll~~t~~~II~I~I~\
:::::::;:;:::::::::::::::::;:::;::
11111'1'1111,\1:111,1,1111
:::::I::!:!::::I:!:::::I:I::
ttt::::tt:~:
.......-.........
..................................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
~tit;~~im~~~~~~i~~m~~i~~
~~~~rt~ft~~r~~~r
:::::!:i:::!:!:!:::::!:::I:I:!:!::
j~~~~~~I~~~~j~~~~~~~j~jji~~~~~j
!:!:'..I':'[II:I,,~III':\:!I~'I',I
:::::::::::::::::::::;::=;::::::::
II
~
III
eo
CD.
":'
Ii
..
IATTACHMENT 11\
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
o F
I N TEN T
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin-
ia, does hereby state its intent to amend various ordinances and to adopt
certain resolutions to set fees, all as set out below:
To amend and reenact Section 2.1-2 of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and
Forestal Districts, of the Code of Albemarle, in subsection (c), as follows:
(c) Each st1eh application for creation of an agricultural and forestal
district shall be accompanied by a fee of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00).
No fee shall be charged for adding parcels to an agricultural and forestal
district, or for reviewing an existing agricultural and forestal district.
To amend and reenact Section 7-4 of Chapter 7, Erosion and Sedimentation
Control, of the Code of Albemarle, in subsection (d), as follows:
(d) Upon the submission of any plan submitted pursuant to section 7-3, the
applicant shall pay to the county a fee of-seyenty-fiye forty dollars to cover
the cost to the county to review and to act upon st1eh soil erosion plans for
residential or agricultural sites; and one hundred dollars ($100.00) to rev~
and act upon such plans for all other sites. For each erosion control inspec-
tion necessitated by this plan, a fee of twenty-fiye thirty dollars ($30.00)
shall be paid by the applicant. The maximum fee chargeable under this section,
inclusive of inspections, shall not exceed three--httndred one thousand
($1,000.00) dollars.
To amend and reenact Section 18-43, Fees, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land,
of the Code of Albemarle, as follows:
(a) Preliminary plat. The subdivider shall pay a fee at the time when the
preliminary plat is filed. Such fee shall be in the form of cash or a check
payable to the "County of Albemarle, Virginia," the amount thereof to be deter-
mined in accordance with the following schedule:
El1--Three-lots-or-less---sixty-fiye-dollars.
EZ1--Fot1r-lo~s-or-more---~wo-ht1ndred-six~y-dollars-plt1s-one-dollar-per
lo~.
(1) For review by the Commission:
a. One to nine lots, five hundred sixty-five dollars ($565.00).
b. Ten to nineteen lots, eight hundred eighty dollars ($880.00).
c. Twenty or more lots, one thousand sixty dollars ($1,060.00).
, .
,
...
Resolution of Intent
Fees
Page 2
(2) Each filing of a preliminary plat, whether or not a preliminary
plat for the same property has been filed previously, shall be subject to thp-
same requirements.
(b)
is filed.
"County of
dance with
Final plat. The subdivider shall pay a fee at the time the final plat
Such fee shall be in the form of cash or a check payable to the
Albemarle, Virginia," the amount thereof to be determined in accor-
the following schedule:
(1) Commission approval: Three -httndred -ni:ne~y -doH:arsr -pIttS -one
doiiar-per-io~,;,
a. One to nine lots, five hundred sixty-five dollars $565.00).
b. Ten to nineteen lots, ei~ht hundred ei~hty dollars ($880.00).
c. Twenty or more lots, one thousand sixty dollars ($1,060.00).
(2) Administrative approval, including family divisions:
seventy-five dollars ($75.00).
~hir~y
(3) Exempt plat: Fif~een Twenty dollars ($20.00).
(4) Condominium plat: Six~y-fi~e Eighty dollars ($80.00).
(5) In addition to the foregoing, in the case of any plat on which is
shown any road to be dedicated to public use, or any private road, the sub-
divider shall pay to the county a fee equal to the cost of the inspection of the
construction of any such road. Such fee shall be paid upon completion of all
necessary inspections and shall be deemed a part of the cost of construction of
such road for the purposes of section 18-19.
(c) Waiver request of subdivision requirement: Six~y-H~e One hundred
forty dollars ($140.00).
(d) Relief from conditions by Commission on plat: One hundred forty
dollars ($140.00).
(e) Appeal of plat to board of supervisors: One hundred ninety dollars
($190.00).
(f) Redatin~ of plat, approved and not recorded: Ten dollars ($10.00).
(~) Change in road or development name after submittal of plat:
(1) Change in road name: Fifteen dollars ($15.00).
(2) Change in development name: Twenty dollars ($20.00).
(1 I ..
Resolution of Intent
Fees
Page 3
(h) Extendin~ approval of plat: Thirty-five dollars ($35.00).
(i) Grantin~ request to defer action on plat to:
(1) A specific date: Twenty-five dollars ($25.00).
(2) Indefinitely: Sixty dollars ($60.00).
(i) Bondin~ inspection for plat: Forty-five dollars ($45.00).
(k) Request to board of supervisors to vacate a plat: One hundred thirty-
five dollars ($135.00.
To amend Section 9 of the Water Resources Protection Ordinance in the Code
of Albemarle, in subsection (c) and subsection (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 9. Water Quality Impact Assessment.
(c) Minor Water Quality Impact Assessment:
A minor water quality impact assessment shall be required for any
development which results in land disturbance of greater than two thousand five
hundred (2500) square feet but less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet
within resource protection areas and requires any modification or reduction of
the landward fifty (50) feet of the one hundred (100) foot buffer area. A minor
assessment must demonstrate that the remaining buffer area and necessary best
management practices will effectively achieve pollutant removal equivalent to
the one hundred (100) foot buffer. A request for a minor assessment shall
include a site drawing, accompanied by a fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) in the
form of cash or a check made payable to the "County of Albemarle" , to scale
which shows the following:
* *
* ". ...
n n
(d) Major Water Quality Impact Assessment:
A major water quality impact assessment shall be required for any
development which results in ten thousand (10,000) square feet of land distur-
bance or greater within resource protection areas and requires modification or
reduction of the landward fifty (50) feet of the one hundred (100) foot buffer
area. A request for a major water quality impact assessment shall be accompa-
nied by a fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) in the form of cash or a check made
payable to the "County of Albemarle". and shall include the elements listed for
a minor water quality impact assessment, and the following additional informa-
tion:
* * * * *
..
Resolution of Intent
Fees
Page 4
To amend and reenact Section 35.0, Fees, of the Albemarle County Zoning
Ordinance, as follows:
35.0 FKFS
Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made to the
zoning administrator, the connnission, or the board of supervisors
shall be accompanied hy a tP.P. RS set forth hereinafter, to defray the
cost of processing such application.
a. For a special use permit:
1. Mobile home ana-home-oeettpation - $~5~aa~ $35.00.
2. Rural area divisions - $%65~aa~ $990.00.
3. Connnercial use --$%65~aa~ - $780.00.
4. Industrial use --$%65~aa~ - $810.00.
5. Private club/recreational facility - $%65~aa~ $810.00.
6. Mobile home park or subdivision - $165.00.
7. Public utilities - $%3a~aa~ $810.00.
8. Grade/fill in the flood plain - $690.00.
9. Minor amendment to valid special use permit - $85.00.
10. Extendin~ special use permits - $55.00.
11. Home Occupation-Class A - $10.00;
Home Occupation-Class B - $560.00.
12. All other uses - $%aa~aa~ $780.00.
b. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance - $65~aa~ $665.00.
c. %~---For Amendment to the zoning map --$%65~aa-pitts-$%faere~
~~---For -amendmen~ -~o -~oning -map -ror -pxanned -de~eiopments
$5~a~aa-pitts-$%faere~
1. For planned developments - under 50 acres - $815.00.
2. For planned developments - 50 or more acres - $1,255.00.
3. For all other zoning map amendments - under 50 acres -
$815.00.
4. For all other zoning map amendments - 50 or more acres -
$1,255.00.
5. Minor amendment to a Zoning Map Amendment, e.g., amendin~
use proffer - $175.00.
d. %~---For-reqttests-for-a-~arianee-to-the-hoara-of-~oning-appeais--
$65~aa~ Board of Zoning Appeals:
1. Request for a variance - $95.00.
2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals (including
appeals of zoning administrator's decision) $~5~aa~
$95.00, to be refunded if the decision of the zoning admin-
istrator is overturned.
.
.. ~
Resolution of Intent
Fees
Page 5
e. %~---For freliminary site development plan --$5~a~aa~
1. Residential - $945.00, pl\': $10.00/unit.
2. Non-residential - $1,260.00, plus $10.00/1000 square feet.
~~---For-finai-si~e-deYeiopmen~-pian-fadminis~ra~iYe1---$~6a~aa~
f. Final site development plan:
1. Approved administratively - $325.00.
2. If reviewed by the commission before approval of preliminary
site development plan - $900.00.
3~---For-finai-si~e-deYeiopmen~-pian-feommission-reYiew1~
a1---Prior-~o-preiiminary-pian-approYai---$~~a~aa~
b1---Af~er-preiiminary-pian-approYai---$3aa~aa~
3. If reviewed by the commission after approval of the prelimi-
nary site development plan - $630.00.
4. For site development plan waiver - $%3a~aa~ $215.00.
a
5.
For site development plan amendment:
a) Minor - alterations to parking, circulation, building
size, location --$3a~aa~, $75.00.
b) Major - commission review - $i3a~aa~ $215.00.
6. Review of site development plan by the architectual review
board - $160.00.
7. Appeal of site development plan to the board of supervisors
- $190.00.
8. Rehearing of site development plan by commission or board of
supervisors - $150.00.
9. Re;ection by agent of incomplete site development plan:
a. Re;ected within ten days - $160.00.
b. Suspended after Site Plan Review - $515.00.
g. For relief from a condition of approval from commission or land-
scape waiver by agent - $65~aa~ $140.00.
.
... .
Resolution of Intent
Fees
Page 6
h. Change in road or development name after submittal of site
development plan:
1. Road - $15.00.
2. Development - $20.00.
i. Extending approval of site development plan - $35.00.
;. Granting request to defer action on site development plan,
special use permit or zoning map amendment:
1. To a specific date - $25.00.
2. Indefinitely - $60.00.
k. Bond inspection for site development plan, for each inspection
after the first bond estimate - $45.00.
1. Zoning clearance for new businesses to occupy existing sites -
$25.00.
m. Accessory lodging permits - $25.00.
n. Official Letters:
1. Of determination, such as parcel of record or cateRory of
use - $60.00.
2. Of compliance with county ordinances- $60.00.
3. Stating number of development rights - $30.00.
o. Sign Permits:
1. Any sign, except auction and temporary event signs, in
excess of five feet - $25.00.
2. Signs required to be reviewed by the architectua1 review
board - $60.00.
In addition to the foregoing, the actual costs of any notice required
under Chapter 11, Title 15.1 of the Code shall be charged to the
applicant, to the extent that the same shall exceed the applicable fee
set forth in this section. Failure to pay all applicable fees shall
constitute grounds for the denial of any application. For any appli-
cation withdrawn after public notice has been given, no part of the
fee will be refunded.
., r
. .
.
..
.
Resolution of Intent
Fees
Page 7
To amend and reenact Paragraph No. 2 of the POLICY FOR SUBHI1.'TAL OF PRO-
POSED AHENDHENTS TO THE COHPREBENSIVE PLAN OF ALBEKAIU.E COUNTY, VIRGINIA, to
read as follows:
2. Comprehensive Plan amendment applications may be filed at the Depart-
ment of Planning and Community Development on or before the first Tuesday,
respectively, of he months of March and September. The application should be
accompanied by cash or a check made payable to the "County of Albemarle, Virltin-
ia," in the amount of six hundred and twenty-five dollars ($625.00).
To adopt by resolution the following fees:
Request to amend service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service
Authority to include property for water and/or sewer service - $130.00, however,
no fee shall be charged for emergency requests when public safety is an issue.
Emergency request to amend service area boundaries of the Albemarle County
Service Authority for water and/ or sewer service (when public safety is an
issue) - $130.00.
Request to abandon roads which mayor may not have been a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways - $135.00.
AND FOK1~ STATES ITS INTENT to repeal language in Section 4.15.4.1, Sign
Permits, of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, relating to fees:
4.15.4.1 SIGN PERMITS
No person shall erect or cause to be erected any sign, except auction
and temporary event signs, in excess of five (5) square feet in area
unless and until a permit therefor shall have been obtained from the
zoning administrator. Sueh-permit-shall-be-issued-upon-the-payment-of
a -fee -in -the -amottnt -of -twenty -dollars -E$r.S"SS1 -to -eoyer -~he -eost
ineident -t.o -t.he -issuanee -of -sueh -permi~ -and -upon -a -finding -by -t.he
zoning-administrator-that-the-proposed-si:8n-eonforms-~o-~he-require-
ments-of-t.his-ordinanee..
2:;
~
o
AND FURTHER requests the Albemarle County Planning Commission to review and
hold hearing(s) on this resolution of intent, and to return its recommendation
to this Board as soon as possible.
I, Lettie E.
constitutes a true,
Board of Supervisors
August 14, 1991.
Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing
correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the
of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular me on
~ ~ty superVi~
... . 'r
:
!;;,ltJ"";:""J' 'u" ~:,,,,':,!,.i' ~'.'). '1/
".1 '~;_I,."" l ....",../U....:, __..._....._....,.....'....
f::~'.::l :'''' ;:.}, q{.Of.:;lZ,I('i'
-.--- - _.....""--....~--..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE ",' ..~.
:..~. L E
,
I..'ll
,!
,
: 'I
, I
'I
MEMORANDUM
lu\
TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
DATE: August 6, 1991
liE: Fee Schedule Review
Attached is a staff report addressing the various concerns
and comments raised in June from our discussion of the
development review fee schedule. The schedule itself provides a
choice for your consideration of fees necessary for recovering
75% of the cost of services or for recouping 100% of the costs.
If you choose to amend our development fees after review of
the report and proposed fee schedule, a resolution of intent to
amend the following code and ordinance sections will be
necessary:
Albemarle County Code
Chapter 2.1 Agricultural and Forestal District,
Section 2.1-2
Chapter 7 Erosion and Sedimentation Control,
Section 7-4(d)
Chapter 18 Subdivision Regulations, Section 18-43
FEES
Chapter 19.1 Article II Protection of Public Drinking
Water, Section 19.1-6
Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
Section 4.15.4.1 Sign Permits
Section 35.0 Fees
RWT,Jr/bat
91-1.98
Attachments
.. "
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Amelia M. Patterson, Zoning Administrator~
August 5, 1991
Fee Schedule Review
At its meeting on June 12, 1991, the Board of Supervisors
deferred this item to a work session on August 14th during the
regular day meeting. The deferral was to allow staff to:
1.
increase
incurred
recommended fees from 50% of the costs
to either:
a phased increase of 75%, then 100%, or
100% all at once
a.
b.
2. review certain applications with the intent of
subsidizing the fees for those services which serve a
public purpose, such as:
a. low and moderate cost housing
b. agricultural/forestal districts
c. other comprehensive Plan objectives
3. adjust fees if inequitable between:
a. Individual homeowners and developers; and
b. Small vs. large development projects
We have changed our recommendations for all but a few fees
to reflect the Board's desire to recover more than 50% of the
costs of providing development-related services. While our
recommendations now reflect a cost recovery of 100%, we have also
supplied the figures for a cost recovery of 75%, should the Board
wish to phase any increase. Since this review began, the Board
has adopted the water resource protection ordinance. We have
amended the fee worksheets to include a recommendation for the
additional review made necessary by this ordinance.
In response to the Board's request that we further review
the fees charged for services that benefit the public primarily,
we have identified four areas of possible subsidy: low- and
. "
moderate-income housing, agricultural/forestal districts,
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and certain emergencies.
After some discussion with the Planning Department, we have
concluded that planning and zoning fees for low- and moderate-
income housing projects are minimal when compared to building
permit fees. For example, the planning and zoning fees for
Crozet Crossing equaled $800.00; for building permits, $8,800.
We asked Mr. Jesse Hurt, Director of Inspections, to comment on
the feasibility of waiving building fees for low- and moderate-
cost housing; he responded that "fairness is better served by
applying these fees consistently" (attached). Mr. st. John, in
an attached opinion, stated "waiver of the [building permit] fees
to individuals or groups who do not qualify for donations, simply
because these individuals or groups are building low cost houses,
is highly questionable". Furthermore, the cost of the
documentation needed to receive a subsidy for development fees
may offset the subsidy. Moreover, the Zoning Ordinance currently
provides for a type of subsidy by allowing developers to increase
the density of development offering low- and moderate-income
housing.
In recognition of the fact that mobile homes provide
affordable housing, we recommend that fees for these special use
permits be subsidized at a 50% cost recovery, which equals $35.
(The current fee is $25). We further recommend that this fee be
standard, whether the special use permit is handled
administratively or sent to public hearing, to avoid penalizing
citizens whose requests for mobile homes raise objections from
their neighbors. We also recommend that fees be waived when
special use permits for mobile homes are requested due to
emergencies such as the loss of a home to fire.
In addition to low- and moderate-income housing,
agricultural/forestal districts also provide a public benefit.
We recommend that fees for these districts be subsidized to
recover 50% of the cost, in order to be consistent with other
recommended subsidies. Since the current fee is only $50, this
recommendation would result in an increase in the fee charged, to
$150. We further recommend that no fee be charged for additions
to and renewal of existing agricultural/forestal districts.
This is in part due to the impracticality of collecting fees for
additions and renewals. Applicants currently pay $25 for
emergency mobile homes.
We are also recommending that fees for Comprehensive Plan
amendments be subsidized to recover only 50% of the costs. There
is no fee currently, we recommend a fee of $315. Public requests
for amendments to the Comprehensive Plans usually arise from
those who intend to utilize the amendment for development. The
proposed fee reflects only the cost of review up until the Board
passes a resolution of intent to adopt the amendment, and not the
actual study itself.
. \
The last fees we recommend subsidizing are those charged for
amendments to the Albemarle County Service Authority
jurisdictional area in case of emergencies. There is no fee
charged currently; we recommend that no fee be charged in the
future for emergencies. We are recommending a fee of $70 for all
other requests to amend the jurisdictional boundaries.
Finally, staff was asked to consider reducing fees based on
the scale and type of development. Several members of the Board
expressed concern over charging individual homeowners the same
fees as developers. Very few of the development-related services
are used by homeowners. We are recommending that one such
service, the review of erosion control plans, cost less for
residential and agricultural uses ($40) than for commercial uses
($100). Both individual homeowners and developers pay building
permit fees; these are based on the value of construction.
Our recommendations also would tie fees to the size of the
development, since large development require additional review
and provide larger profit margins to the developer. The rezoning
for a development of 50+ acres would require a higher fee than a
development of less than 50 acres. The recommended fees for site
plans would depend on both the type of development, commercial or
residential, and the scale of development, by levying additional
charges per unit or square foot of development. Please note that
many smaller developments requiring less intensive review may be
handled under site plan waivers and minor plan amendment, which
cost much less than the site plan fee.
In response to a question from Mr. Don Wagner, we have
researched how much of the budgets for Planning, Engineering and
zoning is derived from development-related fees. Depending on
whether salaries alone or the total budget is considered,
development fees make up 2 - 3.6% of the budget for Zoning, 2 -
4.6% of the budget for Engineering, and 10 - 13.2% of the budget
for Planning.
i.-. .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney
416 Park Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Telephone 296-7138
JAMES M, BOWLING. IV
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
July 29, 1991
GEORGE R. ST.JOHN
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Mr. Amelia M. Patterson
Zoning Administrator
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Re: Waiver of Building Permit Fees
(Our File #ACPZ 91-66)
Dear Amelia:
I find no authority for waiving building permit fees for low
and moderate cost housing projects as such. In fact, I would not
know what you mean by this term.
I believe the County can waive fees with respect to a
project sponsored by an organization which is eligible for
donations or appropriations of money from the County, because in
essence the waiver of such fees would amount to such a gift.
However, waiver of the fees to individuals or groups who do not
qualify for donations, simply because these individuals or groups
are building low cost houses, is highly questionable.
Sincerely yours,
ft-Jen/~--
George R. St. John
County Attorney
GRStJ/tlh
!. ~,,~ ~~ Df\';f rJ'~~::-:t ,,-...,.
V. I ;110.\' : t- t .....J ,;i t~':- ; ;{:''''.!" j .\;'~ ..:\
. n..~,~7i~~}; t~~~: l'c'l1.....~l~R
. ~_'" ~...,""","=j{ e,- ,_" . ._..., /. I _
#f .' - "" 't.?', <~'~ l ~ ! I
JUL 31 1991 "':-}
AL8EM,\h'! r: ;-',~:
ZC;\j;r-:(~-
'.
fr/ \
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Inspections
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5832
MEMORANDUM
TO: Amelia Patterson - Zoning Administrator
FROM: Jesse Hurt - Director of Inspections ~~
DATE: July 31, 1991
RE: Your Memo of July 26 Concerning Fees
Regarding your comments about development costs for low and
moderate cost housing projects, the Inspections Department does
not support the proposal to waive building permit fees. We have a
couple of concerns here.
First, The Inspections Department has experienced great success in
applying our fee schedule consistently. We feel that our
residential fees are fair, and, when considering the ongoing
inspection services on any particular structure, they may be a
bargain. Whether fancy or modest, residential projects typically
require the same inspections and the same commitment of man-hours.
Second, how does one define "low and moderate cost housing
projects"? We can forsee never-ending debate with citizens whose
residential construction sites do not occur in a "project", but
who would readily, and accurately, describe themselves as being in
a low to moderate income bracket.
Section 104.1 of the 1990 Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code
allows the local governing body to set fees to defray the costs of
building code enforcement. This Section appears to a1low,the
Board of Supervisors a great deal of discretion on how, and whom,
to charge. However, regardless of the County Attorney's legal
determination, we feel that fairness is better served by applying
these fees consistently.
JRH: wmh
cc: Bob Brandenburger
Jay Schlothauer
George st. John
Reading File
0)
01
CIl
c..
oj
o
-
Olni
. c: Q.
11 01
~ :J ,!:: <U
:0 ~ .~ 0
0....3201
CD~~@
c: g? iE a::
~~'O 0)
>-....c::>
t:: U) Q)E .~
0) .;:: Q)
g. 'E g ~
o.-g~a.
.~ ~ 0: g
c:'O .0
:2, c: :5 l\1
'0 l\1:;::; 0)
l\1..c:l\1~
c: 0) ,~ 0)
l\1CDa.l/)
l/):=Cl.l/)
~11~E
c: 'E- 0) 0
:J .... Cl...c:
~O)RO)
0> Cl. (/} =
~~-.g
~O)~E
1;)5(/)Q)
'c 0 8 g
E ~ 0) '00
'O00ll/)
l\1;;lj~1il
'00)0
~ci~()
'O~c:0)
@ l\1 ~
J:'sC:-5
. - .............
::~4::i:m~:
'~r):('t,:::::'
~'Q'nn.
:'~::i:ill":i::::::':::
!;t;}}:,}:,:{{
11111:111111
'::::i::':::::::::::::::::i':::::'
:;):&.)!i.:
~I
() ::I:II:::::::::::::::::::
ffi Ilill~11111
(j) :~:,:,:I:,::,:~:
,'''''n .:t).n (;i)
~ :I:::I:I'!::,::;:,:::
0::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
~ill
onnn.nnn
~illlilllillll:
~I
I :j:j":)"j,':":::(((
I- :::{{:,:tttt:::
::.:.:.:.:.;.;.;...:::::t:;:::
o ,}:{{:}:{{::{
z::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
<{ I:::i:::::::::::::::!:::::::::::::
(f'J ::::::::::::::;:;:::::::::::::::::
w::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
W.::::,
II ..................................
u... :m:m:m:mf:m::'::::m
o i:~:~:~:~:i:i:::i:::::::i:i:i:i:i:.
W:=:::.=:::::=::::::::=::=::=:
o rfrrfrrf~~
z :II::::::::'::::::::::::::::
W.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
~:;;:::::::::'::::::;:::::;::::::.
~ {{':':"""':':::':::'}:
o :.::;:;:;::.:.~::'::::;.::
~11:::::11111111111:!::!:!::
C") 0
C\Il!)
....
l!) l!)
C")C")
C") C")
co
l!) l!)
C\I C\I
00
C") 0
C\/
01
~ c:
,~ ~
.0 0)
o ....
Q;~
c: 0)
:= .~
olii
>--=
t:: l/)
~:s
o E
Ci~
01
.!:: ~ .
.!:: '0 :5
o c: .-
'- l\1-
~..c:~
c:0)=
n1Q5~
~ := CIl
~ ~ Q;
c: ,- Cl.
:JEco
>-O)'<t
- Cl. C")
g? 0) (/}
~~o
~~1ii
,!!? - 0
,!:: 0 ()
E ~ 0)
"O~g>
l\1 C") CD
~ci~
"O~c:
@ CIl
J: c: c:
o
ex;
C")O
C\IC\/
'<t
C")
'<t
/'0-
l!)
co
l!)
co
o
<D
o
ex;
co
o
<D
o
C\I
l!)
<D
o
....
co
en
c:
.2
~
:J
()
<U
()
.~
:J
~
'0
>-
..c:
o
:=
0)
'S;
~
01
c:
.~
0)
c:
'5>
c:
0)
<U
c:
.2
15
'0
l\1
l/)
~
:J
g-
o:
o
....
co
o
0>
<D
o
co
/'0-
l!) l!)
/'0-/'0-
C")'<t
co
/'0-
(\j
o
C\/
co
o
<D
co
....
l!)
l!)l!)
C\/C\1
l!)
<D
l!)
<D
l!)
<D
<D
'<t
....
C")
00
C")<D
l!)
o
0>
0>
o
co
/'0-
o
....
co
o
C")
o
o
....
o
o
o
....
co
o
0>
<D
o
co
/'0-
CD '0 l/)
....
l/) 0) >- 0) <U
l/) :=
l\1 l\1 := ~ c:
;: (5 ;: l/) ..2 "0 .8 ;: 0
,!:: 0) ,5 0) c: <U l/) 0 ..2 lii
'S; c: 'S; 0 l/) 0) 0)
~ E 0 E '00 "0 "0 <U
0) ~ 0) 0) :J ~ ~ 0>
E '0 0: '0 0: 'S; l/) '0 l/) l/)
0) l\1 Cl. l\1 (5 :J 0) .... ~ -5
CD E ~ (f) :J (f) ~ c: l/) l/) -- l/)
0 ~o .- (5 :J .0 c: 0)
c.. 0 () l\1 a: :J l/)
0) :r: > CD () > co 0) () 0 ~ c.. 5 :J
eod 0 eod ~ CD (f) ..c: (f) () c:
l/) ~ '(ij CD
:::l ~ E () 0)
2:0 0) 2:0 ~ >- V) 1il >- lii ,~ ,~ a.
<U .0 E E .D :J .D :0 '0 ..c:
0 <( c.. 0 <( c.. :J 0 2:- <Ii '0 ~ .~ ~ '0 0
.~ ni a: '(3 :J 0
~ N :r: N 0: 0 c: ,S c: ,!;! c.. C!l g =<
Cl. .... .... 0 () 0
(f) <C c:i <.5 c:i u.i LL (!) :r: ...:
...:
en
0)
2
:=
0)
c:
l/)
0)
lii
,~
"0
c:
c:
,2
lii
,~
a.
Cl.
CIl
C ....
O),E
E'O
~E
~ E
>.0
"0 :J
l\1 V)
"00
@ c:
0) l/)
OlE
CIl 0)
1il~
8..E
l/)
ro ~
1il c:
o ~
2
11 c:
;;:: 0
Q) ()
c:_
0> 0
.0 l/)
~1il
c: 0
'-;:: ()
o
"0"0
c: CIl
CIl 0)
l/)..c:
.~ Q;
ni >
<U 0
l/) 0)
l/)"O
0) :J
"0'0
:J c:
go
c:
~ ~
o 0
00
Iii
I-
o
Z
C\J
Q)
Ol
CIl
Cl.
f .
...... ..........
.................
............................'.....
..................................
..................................
.................
.................
..................................
......'...........................
.................
,................
..................................
.................
.................
..................................
....'..,..........................
..................................
.................
.................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
.................
.................
..................-.........-.....
..................................
..................................
..................................
............................'.....
.................
.................
.................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..................................
..................................
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
..................................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..................................
.................
..."............
..'..,.,.......,...............,..
..................................
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.
...............,.
..................................
!I!:I:!IIII:IIIIIIIII!IIIII:I:IIII
.................
.................
.................
..................................
..................................
..............-..
.................
.................
...........,-....
:.:...;.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.
..................................
..................................
.................
.................
..................................
:.:.:.::.:-:.:.;.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:
.................
.................
..................................
f)r{~~~~\f\~~
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
~~t~~t~~~rfItm
.................
.................
.................
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
.................
.................
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
.................
..................................
:::::::::::::::::::;:::;::::;:::::
::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::=::
.................
.................
.................
................ .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.................
:::::::::::::::;:::;:::::::::::;::
.................
ill:!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII:II!11
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.
.................
.................
.................
.................
.:.:-;.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
...............-.
.................
.................
.................
~:~:~:r~:~:~:~:~:~:~;~:~:;:~:;:
il:~:,~::::i:::',:~:",l!!,
e.............
~!"I'li'I'illl!i!lil!:!I!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
............... ..
.................
~rrrfmmrmr
~:~:r~:~:~:~:;:~:~:}~:;:;:~:
.................
::i:::ii:iii:::i:l:ii:ii::::::::::
..................................
;:;.;:::;;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:::::
. .............
.. .............
:'~fW.Iil ill
:'~:,,:cf',,'::,',': <D
i:I~:,'i:,::,:i!,!:!'!
'a:;::::::::'::::
!~!!!!I.I:III ~
:;;:::::ffi:::::::::::::
':':':':':':':':':':':-:':':':'.
_$
::Et))))):::
:'~;r:':':':':':':':':':':':'
en :~i!ill:ililll!:I:lllllilli
w:':'::,:,::::::::':':':"':':':'::
, '\. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
'-' ~i~j)~iii{\~~
ffi 1!I!i~il!i_ ~
......,I...lIl.
(J) .~,{,:. -:::n;.,
9.. '8
~Ii
~ 111:11111111 ill
11$
w )))))):':'::)
I.:::::,:.:,:::,:::::.:.:.:.:.::::
'-;;,::,;,:.;:;:;;::.:.:.:..;.:
0:::':::::::::::::::::':::::.:'::::
z :~:f;;~:~:~:~:r~:?}~:~
<( :::rr':mm::m::"':'m
en ':':::::::':::::::::'))):
w:,::::,.,::"":::',',,::,:,},,
w ::':':\\\\\\::::
LL .................
:':::::':::':::!:':::::::::::::::: ~
0................
w:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::5
o fttt~ff\}~ 0
m ::::f::::f::::::f:::::~~: ~
~ :::::::m:::mmmmm:::m ~
-.:: ,,}}}:{{,:::,}:: E
..:::; ::,,:,::,:.:,:,:,:,,:,:,,::,:::: '0
~IIJ
ui'O
Ole
E .!:: Q)
e E
.c 2 E
(J) Q) 0
~~~
8~
Q)
c: ~
'I:l 0
o..()
.E
e
o
~ ~
.2 .c
0.-
0.~Q)
CIlOn;
'0 E lil
~ ,S ~ ~
'5 Ol - '0
~~~CI)
~~~g>
0..0 (f) 'c
Q)Q)_0
,,!:: (J) ~ ~
(J) ~ u ...
gJ 'a5 ~ .E
-g:ECIlll)O
_Q).c..-
gOlO<ogJ
~-~o
~~Q;'OCIl
Q)0'O
~~~~~
ll)
ll)
C\/
~ ..-
..-
0> <D
), \,
..-
<0 <0
(#) ll) ~
-
0 ll) 0
C\/
CIl ..- CIl
0 (#) 0
ll) - ll)
... 0 Q;
Q) CIl
'0 + '0
e 0 e
~ ll) ~
..- 0
v C\/
~ Q)
ll) (:;
CIl
-
..-
(#)
+
ll)
ll)
C\J
(J)
Ol
e
e
o
N
Q)
...
...
.f?
ll)
Q)ll)
~C\J
oiE;}
e'O
.- e
g CIl
~ gJ
... ...
~ ~
-0
'Oll)
e
CIl
:E
~
c
C Q)
Q) E
'0 a.
.~ n; ~
~ E ~
g{g'O
'iij ~
.E~c
g'O{g
~ ;g .~
(#)~'I
'0 Q; cl
~ a. g
n;~'O
~~~
'OQ)_
Ow ~ ~
~ CIl CIl
... .c ~
.f?<.>g
ll)n;o
veo
~g~
1Ii:g Q;
lB CIl a.
-co
__co cu --
.c(#)
o ,,!:: '0
t ~ ~
-gee
CJ) Q) Q)
E E E
Eg.g.
0--
a:l ~ ~
a:{g{g
u;
o
<.>
Q)
:E
'0
~
o
ll)
~
e
o
Q;
~
~
E
Q)
2
Ol
e
'iij
CIl
~
a:l
'0
'0
e
Q)
E
E
o
<.>
Q)
a:
ai.
o
E
ll)
co
o
<D
C\/
o
o
0>
ll)
C\/
C")
o
C")
<D
ll)
f'o-
<D
C")
f'o-
v
ll)o
v<D
O>~
(#)(#)
- -
Cii .
._ '0
cow
Q) Q)
'0 'I
'iij e
Q) 0
a:z
..-
v
o
<0
<0
v
o
<0
ll)
<D
o
C\/
ll)
o
<D
C\J
o
C\J
f'o-
o
o
C")
ll)
co
o
<D
C\/
ll)
C\J
C")
o
o
0>
o
C")
<D
a. Q;
CIl >
~ 'iij
Ol ~
e
e (J) e
Q) CIl
<.> 0 a. e Cii 0:::
e N CIl CIl () Ol
CIl Q) ~ 0::: e Cl. :> e Cii e C e
e :E E >. e ~ > ~
Ol ~ (J) 0 Q)
'0 e e '0 .0 a. a. ... a. E Q)
0 E (J) (i) CIl CIl a. a. ~
'0 C e 0::: '0 CIl ,s a. E 0.'0
(J) 0 >. '0 Q) .2'0
Ol C Q) Q) N ... Q) ~ Q) CIl
e ... Q) Q)
e E ... CIl ~ :> Q) 0 ... Q) ...
Q) e .!:: 0 a. 2 a. > C")
e E CIl a. Q) (J) (i) a. '5 Q; Q)
0 0::: 0 .c e E ~ ~ 0 (f)
N '0 Q) <5 CIl Cii a. .0 '0 '0 CIl
e 0 0::: Q) <( ~ .c
Q) Q) > e := <Ii .ri
:E Q) ;( a: u:: (i) <.>
E lJ.. 0 ~ C\i ~
'0 <( (i) ..- (J)
< a:i < a:i 0
..: ->
ll)
C\J
<D
(\j
o
<D
o
C')
ll)
..-
C\/
vi
Q)
2
~
Q)
e
(J)
Q)
co
g
'0
e
c:
0
~
,2
0.
a.
C CIl
Q) .E
E 'D
Q) Q)
,'!!.
Q; E
> .0
'0 ~
CIl (J)
'0 <5
e e
CIl
Q) (J)
Ol E
CIl ~
U;
o '-
o..f?
- (J)
~ Q)
<.>
U; e
'0 Q)
~
~ e
0
Q) u
e '0
Q)
.0 (J)
Q) U;
Ol 0
e <.>
:E 0
'0 '0
e
CIl CIl
Q)
(J) .c
Q) Q;
.~ >
Cii 0
(J) Q)
(J) '0
Q) ~
'0 U
~ c
u <5
c
Q) e
(J) (J)
u U; Q)
~ 0 0
a. () 0
e ill
0
I-
a
z
C")
Q)
Ol .
ctl
a.
. ..............
':~:::~~:::n:
;:~t~t;;;:;:;;;:
:~~::::{:m:::~~:::::::
J~::::{,~:~:::~:~:}}
!~i,"il'i,1
:w:~::i~::::::::::::.
rffr~r~frr
[i:::~:I~Wi:
,~,:::i::::'!,!:!i:!
111111!1!11!!:!!ll!lllll:I!1
en~;;:tt::t~:~:~:~::
w;.;.;.;.;';.;.;.;';.;.;.;.;.;.....
() :::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::
ffi Illll~lllll
en ~,}I.~:;~.
~ ill!!!II:!!;:i::~:::
o t~:::~::::f:~:ttt~~
~I
~!I!!!!!!!I'lli
~I
w.:',.:';.,.,.;.:...;.;';';';':':.:
~!,I!ill!!!":"!':"""I'III:I!:!
o :t:::fff::::m:m:::
z :::r:;':rrrrri
< :''':'::f:::::tttt:
*I~
~lIi
~Ij
~:;:.~;~::::,~:::::;}:;; Q
ll)
I'-
ll)
C\i
<D
ll)
Ol
c
'iii
::l
'0
C
Q)
E
E~
o :>
u(5
Q) :>
a: c
Vl u;
:2 8
Q) Q)
05
E >.
<5Q)
-q-~
.2 i3
U
,~ ctl
C Q)
o <5
'iii E
:~
'00
.0 Q)
~~
- .2
g Vl
C\JE
<h 0
Q) 0.
~-'"
ctl ctl
.c Q)
U ~
>..0
~c
a3 ~
~~
()'O
<DOO
<DOO<D
ll)OOO
vi
Q)
2
::
Q)
c
Vl
<D
Cil
,2
'0
c
ll)0ll)
C\J <D (J)
'<t<D1'-
C
.2
~
,2
0 0 ..... 0 ll) 0.
'<t <D ..... C") C\J 0.
C ctl
Q) .2
E '0
<D ~
,~
Q5 E
> .0
'0 ::l
ctl Vl
0 0 ll) 0 0 '0 0
C") C") <D <D <D C
C\J C\J ctl C
<D Vl
Ol E
ctl Q)
u; ,-
o ~
ll) ll) <D 0 0 0.,2
I'- ..... <D a) <D Vl
C\J ll) a) 0 <D
ctl U
Vi c
'0 <D
2
.~ c
Qj 0
U
c '0
<D
.0 Vl
Q) Vi
Ol 0
C U
E ~
0
'0 '0
C
ci> ctl ctl
<D
'0 '0 Vl .c
:0 ~ <D Q5
.2 c: '0 .~ >
Vl C (ij 0
c .2 ctl Q)
.2 :x: Vl () Vl
~ >. Q) Vl a. Vl '0
~ Q) ::J
::l C .: Vl ~ <D
'- ~ ,~ ::l () ~ Q) Vl '0 U
2 g ~ o-a. a. -E :2 ::J C
(ij U ctl ~ >. 0::: >. >..l!.l U 0
oi ~ ~ .0 C ~ .0,2 0> Vl C
>..: 0 ..... c
c c <5 :: c ~ 0> 0 Vl
0 ~ <D 'iii .2 u; Vl
C oi E '(ij' :~ E :: .2 <D
~ N 'S; 0 + 0 0
~ 'iii '0 ~ ~ '0 Q) <D 0 () Q
0. ctl .0 0: 'S; C\J
C\i ::J ~ C\i c0 t.i.i
(/) <i I-
0
> z
'<t
0);' j
0>
ro
c..
C/)
w
()
>
a:
w
C/)
(!)
z
o
>
o
a:
a.
u.
o
C/)
I-
C/)
o
()
W
I
I-
o
Z
<(
C/)
W
W
U.
o
W
o
Z
W
~
~
o
()
w
a:
:::I":'::':~~I:~::W:
:,' ',:::0,:,:,:,:,:,:,
. ......Q.............
~~. . ..\j~:tt~~t
:~M:::II:i':::::::I
,l:l:,'""":"""":"",,,,
.................
.................
::,;w;;:::::::::::::::::::::::::
!~!I!II"!!I
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
............... ..
.................
..................................
;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:
1111111111111
111!111111111111111111111111
ct',~,~,~,i,~,~,:,i,',',
::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::
.................
.................
.................
.................
ttr~~ttttt
.................
.................
II1111I1111
.......i......
~::::::...::::::~:
."".. ......
'i::ii~b:::ig:
.................
.................
.................
..................................
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................
.................
.................
.................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.................
..................................
..................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.~:::~~.!.!:m
::$.:m:mm:m:;::mm
m::~:~:::::::~'::,::::::~:
........,........
\I:\!::~iilll!
"""""",9,:,:"",:",
I
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.................
..................................
.................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.................
................ .
.................
.................
.................
..................................
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
..................................
.................
..................................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
...................................
................ .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................
.................
..................................
..................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
:::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::
.................
.................
..................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
.................
.................
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
............................,.....
.................
................ .
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.............,..,
.................
.................
.........................,........
.................
.................
.,...............
..................................
.................
.................
. ................
........,........
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
................ .
"}}<ii'{:}
1.I':II.I:I!!l~:I.III!I!I!!I.
,,:,}}~}}},
'. "."". .
"'., .'
," <
.... ."
...,.... . .'
:
....... .'
...... .'.... .
.. .
I '
",.., .
.
. ". ....
I
. . .
. .,
. ."
',', ,.:..... .
, ", .
.....
...'...., .
.'. '..
.... .
'LO '0 LO
~ C\J. C').
<
... ..
. '" .M
. .~"~ .~
.~ . s C\J
"~'
.....
<.0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 .......':
......,p..
<.0 co <.0 f'-. C\J co '<t '<t ".' ".'0)"
LO co 0 ~ ~ ....: ,......:.
.- ....... >>
< ,....,.
LO 0 LO <.0 LO 0 LO LO
C\J <.0 0) LO .- <.0 0 0
'<t <.0 f'-. .- .-
,,~~~~"'~ "
LOOO
<.0 co <.0
LOCOO
~
O)'<tf'-.
<.o'<tC')
0-
0)..2
C');::
~
+
<.000
<.0 co <.0
LOCOO
.-
ro
>
o
a.
a.
ro 1Il
o '^ (5
c..~-
OlOO)lIl
~cO)';;(5
~'-o-+
o..:J-oo
roas'-~C\J
.s a: cO .ci t.i
u..
~
a:i
LO
f'-.
o
'<t
o
C')
LO
f'-.
ro
>
o
a.
a.
ro
.s
E
"0
<(
N
o
C\J
LO
f'-.
LO
.-
o
C\J
~
a.
0.
E
0)
dj
C'l
o
co
o
'<t
~
~
co
<.0
'<t
LO
<.0
LO
<.0
o
co
o
'<t
~
ro
a.
E
.:1
c
E
o
"0
c
o
o
-.i
c
o
.00
.;:;
'6
.0
:J 1Il
1Il C
'0 0)
'- E
0) 0)
> '-
'iij :J
3: as
'-
c5
. ..,....".
... ,,"K.<
. ':>N
o
'<t
,...
.. ...~.....~
Uf
'C')
<.0
'<t
'0'
.
.... I
'. I
I
I
"'~.I" 00 0
I '. . '. ....
..... I
. .. I
J.. .. '.'
1< ..:....... 0 0: 0
:.... . I
'.
. . .. . LO 0 LO
. ,... C\J C')
......
LO
<.0
o
'<t
,...
d
'0)
-:r-"
..
>-
.0
1Il
c
.2
-g~
o a.
(.) '-
E 0
e~
- a.
W C
:::: 0
$0
.....c..
ci
I
. II
. ..............
..':..:.......... ..... ..... ........ '.'
..' ..
......
. .' .
..........\....,.. ". .
. '1
.~.... '..0 '.~
.':.::~Cll.e _.... .~'O '0
~'. '.. .-e..''itt. . ro
........:.:..~~. .~....-g. .:.......~..:.~. 1~ ~
- .... -""0 "O,"E' - ,-.
-B. ..Ke; ....~-g. g .~
'0 '.. o~ ......~. '.If. _ E ~ -
:T~='~(j;~ g. c ro
.' . ..~..<~..g~~~-g .~ -g ~
. ... .....~ .........:g.t; . .' .. ". '~t~.o.o>' Q) 0
.ili i~.~ .... ..~......~. .:~ ~. ~ .'. ~ ~
. . > >
<Ii
0)
2
=:
0)
c
1Il
0)
ro
.~
"0
C
c
.2
ro
.~
a.
a.
_ ro
c '-
0) 0
E -
O)~
.f.!!. ::::
w 'E
>.0
"0 :J
ro 1Il
-go
ro c
0) 1Il
OlE
ro 0)
tj=:
&.8
:::: ~
ro (.)
tj ai
"0 Q;
~c
:::: 0
0) (.)
c_
O) 0
.0 1Il
~tj
.s 8
'- ...
- 0
"0"0
C ro
ro 0)
1Il.c
0) ...
.\:: Q)
~ ~
rn Q)
lIl"O
0)2
"0 (.)
:J C
(3_
C 0
C
~ 1Il
1Il 0)
o 0
00
ill
I-
a
z
ll)
~ ..
ro
c..
~
.... .... " .
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
;~:~:~:~:;:~;~:~:~:!:!:!:!:!;~;!;~
1:::"il:':1111i:li::::il:':'1.ill
.
~::iii:::i::iii:i:i!:!ii:ii::i::ii
.................
.................
jj~j~i~j~jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
jj{jj}(i(tji/t
:::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;
.................
.................
..................................
..................................
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
.................
.................
.................
;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:
:;:;:;:;:;:::::::;:;:;:::;:;:::;:;
................................'.
..',..............'...............
..................................
..................................
....'.................'..,.......,
..'.............'.......',...,....
.,..............'.......'...',..'.
...............,....'..,........'.
,..,.,...........
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
................ .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
.................
..................
I
.E.............
~.:~::.:,.....1...I:~II:~:
................ .
.................
~~jjjj~jj~jjjjjj~~j~j~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
t~~ttftt~r~
. .............
.. .............
..~:::I,i:~I.
!:I.:::~m:~:~i:i:::~:::
,l:l:::,:,:,:::,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:
1m!j:~~:~~il
:i:i::I:~:::::::~:~:
~~~:~~ttttt~~~~t~~~
001
W }}}://///:
() ;,::,;,;:;,;,;,;,;,:,::;,;,;,;,;,
> ~l1t:'::'{{(~~~
a: .~..s....
W a:;:::$.::::;~~
C/) .""'.....g.........
,Q.::::,,@:~:~:
~ :i~i::$:::1,m{:
o I~::::~::~:::::::::i~:~:~:~::::
8 :i.i.....:~:.:.::I:i.:i:i..i:.i:.:
w tttttttiit
~ ;.:..~:::::'.,.,::.:,.;;:~';.,;:;:
o ~{{{f1tt~fr
z:::~:~:~::;:~:::~~:~~:~:~::::::::
<( """"""""""::,,,,::,,:::,
C/) ))1JJJ:)))
w ~:::::1i1:~11i111:~~~~'~~:~~::::~:
Woo::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
U. ;:;:,:;:::,:,:,:,:,:,:,:::::,:::::
o ~}}}}}}}},
W ~~t~ffff'tt~~
o ~~~i~~t~ffmmff~
z """""",}}}}},
W :~\,i::::,:::,::::::::i:i
~::::::::::::::':::::::':::::::::::
~ \\)))\:{if
~II
-g
c
'-
.::l
Q;
t3 >
0
0) ,~
'0 c
0. 0
'0 'Iii
Q) '~
N '0
'Iii .1Il
0)
::: <5
c e
0 ~
1Il
C c
ro E
Ci '0
0> <(
c OJ
"~ S
0) c
.;;; 0
~ N
2 .-
0)
0) 2
2 '0
0> '0
C c
'Iii :J
ro ~
.0
'0 '0
C c
0) 0)
E E
E E
0 0
al al
0:: 0::
ui
0)
2
::
0)
c
0 0 ll) ll) 1Il
0 '<t 0) 0) 0)
<il
.S2
'0
c
ll) 0 r::. .....
"- e') "-
C
.2
<il
,S2
ll) co co CD a.
"- co CD C\J a.
ro
C 2
0)
E '0
0) .*
.~
Q; E
> .0
'0 :J
ro 1Il
ll) ll) ll) ll) 0 '0 (5
"- "- CD C\J C\J c
ro c
0) 1Il
0> E
ro ~
en
o '-
0 0 ll) ll) ll) 0..2
0 '<t 0) 0) C\J 1Il
Cii 0)
()
en c
'0 0)
2
~ c
(jj 0
()
c '0
0)
.0 1Il
0) Vi
0> 0
c ()
:E 0
'0 '0
c
ro ro
~ 0)
1Il .c.
E 0) Q;
:J C -~ >
1Il () 0 Cii 0
2 .~ 'Iii 1Il 0)
U5 0> .- 1Il '0
<( .!:: g 0) :J
Cii .... U
e ~ c '0 '0
:: 'u 0 .1Il :J c
C 0) Q; C N ()
';;; Q) 0 .- c (5
0 E 1Il '0 E
0) '0 0) e c
<.> 0:: E 'Iii () 1Il Q; 1Il 1Il
c c 0 0) c Cii en c.. en 0)
0 ro <.> 0:: ro 0) 0 0
"Iii c: .~ a. .!:: <.> 0
0 N a. E
W ..... > <( w
c( '0
-> -> <( I-
> 0
x x x X z
(!)
Ol
0>
ro
c..
'.
)
. . ...........
. .............
i~..<~~:~......:}~:
. .., ........
:, ::,:,o:""",,}
::,::!<,:9,~::<:::~:
~:g:ii:@i:iii:i:i::::
~:,:,:,t:,tt,<
:~':':::::::::::::::':::;::
'~I:lll::i:11
.................
.................
..................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.:.:.;.;.;.:.;.;.:.:.;.:.;.:.:.:.:
.................
... .............
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
II
.1............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .............
. .............
. .............
. ............
.; .:.;.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.;.;.:.:
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .............
. ............
,', .........................
. .............
. ............
. .............
:ffi:::::::::i:::::~~::::~:::~
..................................
.................
.................................
~:}i:~:}i:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:::
C/)
W
()
>
a:
w
C/)
(!)
Z
o
>
a
a:
a.
u.
o
C/)
I-
C/)
o
()
W
I
I-
o
Z
<(
C/)
W
W
U. ":.
0..
W
o
Z
W
~ ':.
~
a..
o
w
a:
.:.:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::.;
.. ............
1~1:IFilll~
.......~..l!!
~~::~r . ':f~~:
.""... "(3'
..,..,....i.....
$": ::'.:
~::::::,::,:~ctt:::::{,
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
rrrr~mt~~mJ~
............,....
.................
.................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::;:;
.................
.................
1IIIIilillll
0.........................
.............................
~:~::~~frrr~~rri
~~::::::E:~i
:.9,:,:,:;0.:,:,:::,:,:::-
fu,tQ.tti:
.................
.................
.................
.................
....... .........
.................
.................
.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.;.:
........................'.........
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.....................,.......,....
..................................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
;.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
.................
:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.;.:.:.:.;.:.:.
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
...............................
.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.;.:.:.'
. . .. ............
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..............,..
.................
..................................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.-...............
.................
..................................
..................................
;.;.;.:.:.;.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.
;:;::;;;;:;:::;:::;:;::;;::;::::;:
.................
................
.................
.................
... .............
.... ............
.................
.............. ..
.................
.....,...........
.................
.................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.................
.................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.................
..............................,...
............................-.....
............ ....
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
. ...........
........
'.'
................................
.................
:~::'~:::::::ll::::::::~:~::
.......e:.... .
........ ......
:",:;::,::,:;";;:",:""",,
)))}/i)))
. .... .......
cD
2
c:
.2
iii
.2
a.
a.
ro
~
Ol
c:
JI,II!llll!
c:
OlEii
c: :g'o
.- Ul ~
~;OE
Ol :J ro
g Y'- .
.... '0 Q;; .'
0.a5~ .
'0 E '00
-E c:
Ul,O 0)
gu .g
f ~!i'
:::,A E
o en O!.
c5 :..Q? 01'11';"11111
g.!!! Q) .
(,I}QiC:
o > 0)
_ Ol Ul
o...c: IJ)' .
::l ..2 '0' ....
~!~ .....
jglJ)'O
U5 0) .
o:;:;~
j.ii............
~ >!J'-
o Ol IJ) .
- Ul IJ)'
UlQ)(j) .
~..c: o.
ot:: u
- "0>
Cii c: 0)
',_.CJl .
Ol ~ 0)
"822
u arc;
Ol .:":- <>
iii'O~
- c: 0
C/)rolO
.. '.~/i I
.......................................~1g<<11 '.
. . ;0
. :J
A..
~
.
.
....
...
.
...>} !
.......
.......
'0
CJl
(j)
0)
:<>> .
'E
: .t:: ...
'0)'
2
0> i
'C:
3' ...
're ..... :'..::-1
~ :;>1
'0 I
c: < .....................1
..... Ol
E i
.... E
O' ...
al ... }i
a:
I
.."":::.9.:0."::-1
)\iltil!1
.2
~
0>
:u
..c:
u
Ol
;0
(5
c:
:!2
:J
o
..c:
IJ)
IJ)
c:
~
'0
'0
<(
o
0)
C\/
10"
(?'.
....
~< ~... ~ ~<a.>
" C\/+.Llii
" .... :.....) '-...
~ I. 1~11Ijjl>~ 011
/
..
...
,...,
I....
I
I
00
10
o
o 'g/ ll)
o)Ol (?
C\I .C. r-
~.......
. .
<
....i 5 ......
_ ..... '0
U c:
"~ ctS
(;) ~
B Co
0> -
-c: ro
u .-;... u
"~Uj:::: C'd
Cii .~ ')(<1=:6
(;) "0 o>::-:::::::<L1:.,.
~ ~~i ~
~ C:.8 co
~ roc: q
_ 0>0 __
;:::J c: . 0> - Ul
;c (f)~
:JCJlro'- 0)-
U-Ol'O :Jo.
.-u....,o crUi
0, ~ O'%i ~~
~ 0 <to) :.~ie
o
00
.' .
.'
.
.; .
.......
':' .'
00
:g..rg
......... .........
.. i+
........i< .........
> .......)1!!11!1 ......
.u ......
x.~Jji:!;~ ...........
'~:9 '" .'c <<
::! ..c:,'Ol ..;;
'7 - :c .<(
-g.~. ~ ...~
0) 8 >!1 J!1
~'.- ...........:.~ __ 0
::; C:Ol ..:J' Ol .n
o :..cr ':J ..~
r:'p CJl., Ol Ulf
~:'O g:j ::.~ ~:~. .~
g::8:Jgro a.
o....crOlIJ) :J
-ro~Ol':' u
(j) - :,;;;. .... >; -2
OlroUlOl(j) U
:JC:OE-
cr .2 ~ t.U IJ)ro
Ol'-
a: .2.} .:::.
7'O<CCO
X
x
o
....
. If)''
.~.:.
0) . .
.;.... '.'
....
g}
.
c;
.
.
-
.0
O'
...
6.
~
. "
.
.
..
. '.
..~g'
Ol .-
C .~
.... x
?p
~ ~ .....
U ::!
C U
ro g
~.~........
0)-
(3 Ul
Ol
g' ~1_~
E 'c ~
~, }~'~.~
~~;OUl
.
.....
.
..........
. .
I i
1 I i
: I
, .
. .
'.
I. ......
....::.:
.,
.
. "
. .
.;. .
.~ g(!) .... r g ig.
.' ..
'.
ut. .' LO C')
'<t ;:f . C\/
.'
. .
.
'.. .
o O' 6-
(!) (!) (?
.
0)
10
C\/
. .
I
I~
o 0 :0
'. . I I
'. .... .
.......0..10.... 0
. ..........................<1........... .... ... .
.:'
ll) ob 0
C\/ .' <:D. I (!) C')
......:. ':.
o
'.
o
!1
'E
....
Ol
'::.
0>
c:
'0
"8
i
o
If)
IJ)
Ol
U
;
.
.. I
.
'.
. . "
'.' .
~.
~. . 'E _
..c: .. i5 2-
U.'OOl
~ I~ .~.~
~ .~::::~ ~ <5 ~
5 .0. ~ ~ .g .... ~
:... 'E 0) O)p c 0) .-
rgo~g.s.9lE;:
'- ~ ';:ro'- >; :J C
E....o=~;Oc:Ol
~- >.o.u E
UlOlOCEc:'OOlo.
....:os-= 0 0 ro ~ c: 0
~ :0 ~ g\.:.> .~ '3 Cii Q)
0)-'---"00"->
....10 ro rolO .... Ol U) Ol
~3 o.U;ai 0.... 0 '0
X.':. :
.
'E
roo
o
co
Ol .
~
o
..,.
~
'E
Ol
CJl
(!)
Q
'E
Ol
E
IJ)
IJ)
Ol
~.. ..
~ '.
2
-
Cii
u .'
!!J. '.,
u; .
~... '.
,S .........
I
~ ...
~
~.. .
;
~'" ........
.
.'
.' '. .
.
........ .'. .
00
u)C\/
.............
8.:
'. '.
.'.
: .
. .'
00
.
.
. . .
.
.' ". .
.
. .
If)'
e
Ol
~
.~.
o
~ .
E .
-:-:
>;
:=
~ .
000
Q; "co C
iii:?~
~ <i'ai
:>
x
x
ui
Ol
2
~
Ol
c:
Ul
Ol
iii
.2
'0
c:
c:
.2
iii
.2
a.
a.
_ ro
c: ....
Ol 0
E -
Ol'O
.'!1 ~
~ 'E
>;0
'0 ::!
ro Ul
-go
ro c:
Ol Ul
OlE
ro Ol
Ui "-:
&.e
::::" ~
ro u
Ci) a;
'0 Q5
~c
- 0
Ol U
c:_
Ol 0
;0 Ul
Ol-
Ol~
C u
E 0
'0'0
C ro
ro Ol
Ul..c:
Ol ....
.;: ~
~ 0
lil Ol
Ul'O
Ol'=?
'0 u
:J c:
c:;=
c: 0
.- C
~ IJ)
Ul Ol
o 0
00
Iii
f-
o
Z
r .
~~9J
O:<+r"b'jtpd to Board: ----.-/~' rJ
:.,t".~ J. Qu, l ~:-.;;)7J
Agenda Item No. c:i -
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
..' ji "
-"'"..!
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
;, K
I' ,', ( I Ii ',.' I ,.,
0, I' ',llJ~ ( I,', '1
I i I '; i\ .J ..;
, ; ! ~ C':,~-'''''(.'':''>> : ,i .I
,-.' . ., ~~,. ~....," " ..'
r.;:, _ . '_t': '__,;\i . _ \ ,F
::::::r:~ ::::::,B::~~ ::u:::e::~::::v~ ~
MEMORANDUM
.., :
;,
June 6, 1991
Development Ordinances' Fee Schedule
Staff has completed a review of our development ordinances'
fee schedule for your review and adoption. Meetings with local
citizen groups and the development community were productive and
their suggestions have been incorporated into the schedule
(Attachment C).
Please note that we have provided you with varying rates of
fee recovery for your consideration. Staff has recommended a
recovery rate of 50% which is generally the rate used in the
past. While the majority of the recommended fees show an
increase, when consistently applying the 50% recovery rate,
several show a reduction. Some localities, as you know, are
attempting to recover total costs for these services, which from
a revenue perspective may be prudent at this time. If total
recovery cost is ultimately the Board's goal, I would suggest
that you stage the increase over a 12 - 18 month period since the
50% cost recovery increases purposed are in many cases
significant. This would allow our local economy a chance to
improve before imposing 100% of our service costs.
As an incentive to encourage low-moderate cost housing in
the County, I am recommending that you consider waiving all
development activity fees for those proposals which provide
low-moderate cost housing. Staff will develop criteria for
determining which projects would be eligible for such waiver if
you concur with this recommendation.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please
feel free to contact me.
RWTJr/gs
91-89
Attachment
"
, .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive ~
Amelia M. Patterson, Zoning Administrator~
DATE:
June 4, 1991
RE:
Review of Fee Schedule
At your request, the Departments of Planning, zoning,
Engineering and Building Inspections have reviewed the fees
charged for services related to the subdivision and development
of property. This review was undertaken for two reasons: to
insure that our fees better recover the costs incurred in
providing services and to consider adding to the fee schedule
services we currently provide gratis.
Our review began with a survey of localities similar to
Albemarle County in population and rate of growth. Attachment A
is the survey mailed to these localities. To insure that we
would be comparing fees for similar services, we described each
service in some detail and listed the departments which work
together to provide the service. We requested the same
information from the responding municipalities and asked that
they inform us if their development-related procedures differed
greatly from those of the County.
The results of this survey are displayed in Attachment B.
The localities are presented in ascending order in accordance
with the fees they charge. As you can see, the fees charged by
the County fall in about the middle of the range, or fifth out of
the 12 towns and counties surveyed.
In addition to comparing development-related fees with those
of other localities, we studied our costs and the staff time
involved in providing each service to determine to what extent
our fees reflect the cost involved. Attachment C presents the
results of this analysis. The total cost for each service
includes postage, advertising and an average of the hourly wage
and fringe benefits of the administrative, clerical and other
employees who take part in providing the service. This table
also shows how changing the rate of recovery would increase the
Review of Fee Schedule
June 4, 1991
Page 2
fees charged. Services currently provided at no charge are
indicated by shading.
Before taking the results of this review to the Board of
Supervisors, we wanted to share our findings with some of the
citizens most concerned with development in Albemarle County. We
invited representatives of the Blue Ridge Homebuilders, the
American Association of Professional Engineers, citizens for
Albemarle, the League of Women Voters and the American
Association of Surveyors to meet with us and discuss the results
of the survey and the impact of any increases to our fees. While
attendance was sparse, the participants offered many useful
insights. Representatives for the Blue Ridge Homebuilders and
the surveyors expressed concern that raising the fees might make
it impossible for all but the wealthiest developers to develop
their property and suggested two levels of fees for site plans
and rezonings: a lower fee for smaller projects and a higher one
for larger projects. The representative of citizens for
Albemarle supported raising the fees if the increased revenue
were used to hire more inspectors, particularly for soil erosion
problems.
We have incorporated the first suggestion into Attachment B,
showing two levels of fees for both site plans and rezonings.
For site plans, we have recommended two flat fees, one for
residential and one for non-residential development, with an
additional charge per unit of residential development and per
square footage of non-residential development. We have also
recommended two fees for rezonings, based on the acreage of the
development. This type of fee schedule resembles those adopted
by several of the localities shown in Attachment A.
Historically, our fees have been set to recover 50% of the
costs for services benefiting the general public, such as
planning and zoning review of development, and 100% of the costs
for services benefiting the individual, such as building permits.
It is hoped that the Board, during its work session, will either
confirm this policy or authorize an increase in the rate of
recovery. Based on the Board's direction, we will prepare the
fee schedules for public hearing and provide revenue projections.
cc: Ronald S. Keeler
Jan Sprinkle
Charles E. steinman
Donald Wagner
Eleanor santic
Marilyn Gale
. .
Attachment A
KEY Department participating in review.
1
P Planning Department: reviews for planning and design standards,
compliance with landscaping section of zoning Ordinance, Subdivision
Ordinance and guidelines of Comprehensive Plan.
Z Zoning Department; reviews uses, parking, setbacks, bulk regulations,
etc., for compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
E Engineering Department: reviews calculations and performance standards
for roads, drainage, stormwater detention. Also reviews measures
required by the soil erosion and runoff control ordinances.
BI Fire Officer. Reviews for compliance with fire code and handicapped
access.
(x) Department sometimes participates in review.
Service
Departments
Tour
Fee
Our
Fee
T lme
Req'd
1. Special Use Permits
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Mobi le Home
B. Home Occupation B (req'd if using an
accesory structure or employees other
than family members under same roof)
C. Rural Area Divisions
(req'd to subdivide less than 21
acres after 5 small lot divisions
have been exhausted; also required
for rural preservation subdivisions
if over 20 lots)
D. Commercial uses allowed only by SP
Includes day care, schools, radjo towers
E. Industrial uses allowed
only by SP.
F. Private club/recreational
faci l ity.
G. Public Utilities
H. Grade/Fill in the
Floodplain.
I. All other uses
(includes churches)
11. Amendments to the text of the
Zoning Ordinance
Ill. Amendments to the Zoning Map
A. For Planned Developments
B. All other Zoning Map Amendments
$ 25
30-60 days (P) Z
25
30-60 days (P) Z (E) (BI)
165
71-94 days P Z E
165 71-94 days P Z (E) (BI)
165 71-94 days P Z E (BI)
165 71-94 days P Z (E) (B I)
130 71-94 days P Z (E)
100 71-94 days P Z E
100 71-94 days P Z E
65 120 days P Z
520+ 71/120 days P Z E BI
$1/acre
165+ 71/120 days P Z (E)
2
Service
Departments
Our
Fee
Time
Req'd
Your
Fee
IV. Site Plans
========================================================================================================================
1. Minor: alterations to parking 30 5/50 days P Z E BI
circulation, bui lding size, location.
handled administratively.
2. Major: requires review by 130 50 days P Z E BI
PLanning Commission.
V. Subdivision Plats
A. Preliminary Plats
1. 3 lots or less 65 50 days P Z E
2. 4 lots or more 260 50 days P Z E
B. Final Plats
1. Requiring Commission approval 390+ 50 days P Z E
$1/Lot
2. Administrative approvaL, 30 5 days 'p Z E
incLuding famiLy divisions
3. Exempt pLat 15 5 days P Z
4. Condominium plat 65 5 days P Z E BI
C. ~aiver of subdivision requirements 65 50 days P Z (E)
D. Relief from conditions by Planning 65 50 days P (Z) (E) (BI)
Commission on pLat or plan
A. Preliminary Site PLans
(optional for developer; incLudes
review by the PLanning Commission;
intended as a feasibiLity study:
detailed plans for water, sewer
facilities, drainage, grading and
road plans are not required at this
this stage.)
B. Final Site PLans
1. APpro~. administratively if
if su itted within six months
after ,site plan approved, unless
Planning Commission asks to
review final site plan.
2. If reviewed by Planning Commission
a. before approval of a
preliminary pLan
b. after approvaL of a
preliminary plan
C. Site Development PLan Waiver
granted by PLanning Commission if it
determines that any improvement req'd
by the Zoning Ordinance does not serve
the pubLic interest, or that an alter-
native proposed by a developer would
satisfy the purpose of the Ordinance.
D. Amendments to Site PLans
$520
50 days P Z E BI
260
17+
days
P Z E BI
720
50 days
P Z E BI
300
50 days
P Z E BI
130
50 days
P Z (E) (BI)
'.
..
.
3
" -
Our
Fee
Service
Time
Req'd
Departments
Your
Fee
VI. Erosion Control Plan Review
75
===============================================================================================================
VII. Runoff Control Plan Review
(Ordinance for the protection of public
water supply impoundments)
1. For site plans/subdivision plats
-0-
2. For single-family residences
-0-
VIII. Variances
65
IX. Appeals
A. Of Zoning Administrator's decision 25
B. Of Planning Commission's decision
-0-
X. Inspections
A. For bonding estimates -0-
B. Roads -0-
C. Erosion Control 25
D. Field V1SltS to gather information -0-
for variances, other staff reports.
XI. Sign Permit v
20
XII. letters of Determination -D-
In some circumstances, the Zoning
Administrator determines whether property
in question is a separate parcel entitled
to development rights, based on deeds,
plats, and other documentation provided
by the property owner. The Zoning Admini-
strator verifies this documentation and pro-
vides a letter stating the number of property
rights held by the parcel.
XIII. letters of C~liance -o-
At the request of the property owner or
lending institution, the Zoning Administrator
researches an existing development and provides
a letter stating that the property complies
with County zoning regulations.
XIV. Preliminary Conferences
Property owners and private planning firms
are encouraged to meet with County staff
before submitting a site plan and applica-
tions for zoning text or map amendments and
special use permits.
-0-
30 days
E
P
15 days E
5 days E
28 days (P) Z
28 days (P) Z
60/ P z
75 days
~-
1 day E
1 day E
1 day E
1 day P Z E BI
10 days (P) Z BI
10 days Z
10 days
(P) Z
P Z E BI
..
,J
4
-....
Service
Departrmets
Your
Fee
Our
Fee
Time
Req'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XV. Review by the Architectural Review Board
Needed for all development along designated
entrance corridors, except for single-family
homes.
XVI. Building Permits
Includes review of permits for single-family
homes to insure that property owner meets
zoning regulations and any necessary runoff
and erosion control measures. will include
review to insure that property owner complies
with the Chesapeake Bay regulations, if adopted
by this County.
XVI I. Bonding
Includes maintaInIng bond files, sending
letters of renewal and providing lists of
bonds and expiration dates to developers
upon request. (Inspections for bond
estimates and completion of necessary
improvements included under "X. Inspections")
XVIII. Zoning Clearances
Needed for new businesses and businesses
changing ownership or location.
XIX.
Home Occupations, Class A
May be granted instead of a Home Occupation
Class B if applicant has no employees other
than family members living in the house in
which the business is to be.
-0-
60 days
P Z E BI
P Z
-0-
2 days
P Z
-0-
vari es
Z
-0-
1 day
Z
-0-
1 day
0,
0>
o
....
~
~
o
:T
~
:-
.,..
5?01~
rti Q ::l
.g~~
~5;;:
~~~
)>
3
(1)
;:)
a.
3
(1)
;:)
en
:-
N
o
;:)
;:)
lC
-l
(1)
~
)>
3
(1)
;:)
a.
3
(1)
::>
en
~
(]1
o
~
o
o
~
o
o
+
~
-
9:
~
o
:-?=
001
:T'i
~ l'S.
-c
ii>
S'
~~
g;g;
Z~
_ 0
>
Z~
>Ol
~Z
8 );
o
"tl
c
~
0'
~
0;'
'"
:n
~~
o <'
co III
e m
(5' 0
::J C
~C"
~
(]1
o
Z
);
~
o
o
rn
~0 ~
o:n~::I:
o C (J') 0
~ ~ '" ~
'" )> OJ 0
o CD (')
~ ~ g
~o ].
(tj~: o'
o' :::J
::J
~
o
~
.,
(]1
~
-oJ
(]1
~
o
.,..
1:
o
2:
(i;'
::I:
o
3
'"
"tl
'"
~
'"
~
(]1
o
Z
);
~
-oJ
Ul
~
o
o
:-
(J)
"0
(1)
(")
~
C
en
(1)
iJ
(1)
3
en
....
"
...........
~
(]1
o
~
Ul
o
Z
);
~
.,
g;
~
QI
o
Z
);
~
o
~
o
::J
0..
C
~
~
C
'"
'"
~
QI
o
~Z
~>
~$\d
W~f~
~::II::~:
tt~~ts~
,:,:,:,;,:,;,;(.t1.:
::::::::::::.:::1""
,..
11:11
~~:~~~:::::~:~S~
:::,;,:,:,;,:,::1;:
1111
,:;:::,:,:,:::!@,:
;:::::::::::;;0;:.
::,'!~"!:::,:~:'
:6th
i"ii
~,;,;~':
,:,:,;,;,:,::;jJ),;
::::::::::::::~::
I
~
o
o
~
o
o
~
-oJ
QI
~
.,
g;
+
~
.,
QI
ii>
o
~
Go
g;
QlOJ
~ ~ ~
III ~ 0
o 0 CD
~Qo(l)
en 01 Q
g~(i;'
~~
~~
.... .,
00
00
~
....
g;
Z
);
~ ~
~ ....
.,0
I 0
~I
.... ~
o 0>
~t;
co +
~
-oJ
""
0>
QI
s- ~
~ ~ 01
::5-"'"
+ 0 Go
~ III 0
co (') 0'
o ~ ~
Di" <P _
o '" ::r
co <D
~ ~
~ Go
., -oJ
fl)0
o +
+ ~
~~
0> 0
t:~
III 0
o ~
<D
~
....
g;
+
~
o
ii>
o
co
Z
);
~
QI
-oJ
Ul
+
~
o
ii>
o
(i)
~
.,
01
+
~
~
..
o
co
~
Go
o
-oJ
o
+
~
0>
QI
III
o
co
~
Go
o
o
~~
~ ~
00
~
....
g;
~Z
~);
o
Z
);
~~
g; g;
00
~
o
QI
~~
0> 0
.,
""
~
....
o
o
'@~Z
~~);
+
~
~
o
(i)
~
i~
o
I
~
-oJ
Go
~
~
o
~~
.... 0
-oJ
o
+
~
01
~
III
o
co
'@~
~~
+
~
~
o
co
~
Go
o
o
~
Go
o
o
Z
);
~
0>
.,
""
~
-oJ
Go
0>
o
~
....
-oJ
o
+
~
QI
QI
ii>
()
co
~
Go
o
o
~
Go
o
o
~
g;
o
~
0>
.,
""
~~
OJ.,
N ~
~+
~
QI
~
co
~
.,
Ul
Go
o
~
....
-oJ
o
+
~
QI
~
III
()
(i)
Z
);
~~
~ 0
o
o
~
-oJ
QI
~Z
Ol );
Z
);
~Z
g>
~
Go
o
o
~Z
~>
o
~
Go
o
o
~Z
~>
o
~
g;
o
~Z
g;);
o
Z
);
il>Z
~>
""
Z
);
ZZ
>>
~
-oJ
Go
0>
o
il>Z
ti};
Go
o
~
....
.....
o
+
~
QI
~
III
o
(i)
~Z
~>
+
iI>
QI
~
III
()
Q
Z
);
~
Go
o
o
Z
);
~
.,
QI
Z~ ~
_OJ.,
)>N~
~+
~
QI
ii>
()
CD
~ ~
o ....
0>
o
~
....
-oJ
o
+
~
QI
QI
ii>
()
CD
~
o
o
Z
);
iI>
Go
o
o
Z
);
~
QI
....
QI
I!!iil
~,\\\Q
:.:.:.:.:-:.:.~.
(((re,:
ii\\li\III:\III:ill:\I.
tf::K
,:0,:,:,;0,;
::c:::::::~.:
lii:~::8
~6):I
;(}~~
)),Qi
" -
}(rn~
..........
:~~~:~~
I:::::~
:\\t~
!',:::!:::!:;;!
:1:;:1
I::j:j:],~
:~Ig;
:a:::::~
~::,Jjl:
",:,:,,:}';:;:f
:6th
;;Q:::::,:;:r:'
,C,:,:,:jJ)::
~::::j~
::::i:~i'~:]i~
"
m
m
(J)
o
I
)>
JJ
G>
m
o
OJ
-<
r
o
o
)>
r
-I
m
(J)
(J)
~
r
)>
JJ
-I
o
)>
r
OJ
m
~
)>
JJ
r
m
:t:>
rt
rt
P.i
()
::Y
S
CD
::s
rt
tJj
"tl
III
co
'"
0 ;s :< :<
Ol
<> 9 0 !Jl ?>
.,. en 9 0 !ll ?>
(0 m JJ <D =E fo ~ !'> " !'> "U C !'> :-" !'> ~
0 !t .n () 5' .,. c.> ~ 0- )> =E " "U CD
[ C ll> ~ 5: "U 3: 3: 3 ll> "U )> 5' ~
en =;. <' 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 3' 0- '" ~
o' '" ~ ::l '" 3 <' ll> 5' <' 0 a. 3' ~
3 "U Q" ::l ~ 3
=> 0 3 a. 5' 0 en 5' en' g a.
(l) Q. 0 ;;? JJ ~ g o ll> 3 5' 5' I>>
3 ~. (l) o. =>
-a ::l < ... ... (l) ~. ll> en
ii> () (jj ~ <E' 3 - '< => ::t -<
=> 0 :l: 0 ~ "U en ~
::l <' <D en ~ <'
~ (l) (l)
(5'
::l
en
{;>
~
{;>
o
{;>{;>zen{;>
oo>~~
en
ll>
3
(l)
{;>
01
:::,
~
{;>
o
{;> {;> {;> {;>
0000
zz
>>
en
ll>
3
(l)
{;>
o
z
:>
en
ll>
3
(l)
{;>
N
01
+
~
-
~
{;> {f> {;> Z{;>{f> Z ~
N 0 0 _NN :>
01 )>0101 0
+ 0
{;> +
g: ~
~ 0
:::,
~
{;>
~
+
~
o
:::,
~
{;>
o
{;>
o
{;>
o
{;> {;>
00
(;>
01
o
':s}i:o
~$r~i[:
i:i:::i:i:::i~i!~
.~~::::::i:~:i!
11':il
,:,:,:,:,:,:,::3,:
~~ft/S~
:::,:,:,:,:,:,::1:,
1111'
,:::::,:,:,:::!&::
",::":,,:::,g,,
:,:,:,:,:,:,:;0.:,
bi?g
:;JF1
~.)m..:
,:,:,:,:::,:,:13),:
::::::::::::::~::
~m?~
1:::lim
~mimf~i~
:I'ill
1:::::6
I
6i:K
,=0,:,:,:0,:
::c::::::~.:
1:::::$
1::11
:,:,:,:,:::,:,li!t.,
z
:>
z
:>
z
:>
zz
>>
z
:>
z
:>
z
:>
z
:>
zz
>>
~ z {;> {;> {;> z z
:> 0 01 ~ :> :>
0 g 0
0 0
0 +
0
0
en
.n
?'
{;> {;> {;> {;> {;> en + {;> ~ ~
c.> c.> N 0 N ll> {f>N
0 0 ~ 01 3 ~01 N 0
0 0 01
iil ~ (l) g: CD
ll>
0 en ~ al
3 c
ll> 0' Q
X a.
Q. :co N
~
en
{;> Z Z {;> Z{f> z en ~
N :> :> 0 _01 :> ll>
01 )>0 3
+ + '" +
{;> {;> {f>
iil g: g:
0 ~ ~
{;> Z Z z{;> z en ~ (;>
01 :> :> _ 0 :> ll> ~~
0 )> 3
'" +
2. {;>
::l ~
.:.,g
ll>
0
-~--E.<t*
Olc.>c.>01N
+ Ol I N 0
O--.j~01CO
-+0+-
en _ N
-*0-0_
0'1-.....0
:::, 0-
~ t: ~
c
~
{f> z g>&>&, {;> g> ~
0 :> CO
3 3 3 01 3 --.j
0
'" '" '" + '" +
{f>
g: {f>
01
~ :::,
sa.
JJ{;> () {;> z z
'" N 0 N 0 0
en N 3 N
-. 01 01 --i --i
g. + 3 + () ()
::l {;> (l) (;> 0 0
::!. F\) c:; 01 3: 3:
ll> 0 [ 0
- - iil "U "U
~ )> )>
0 JJ JJ
)> )>
CD CD
z Q. {;> ~~~~~ z en (f>
:> N :> ll> c.>
"U Ol )> 01 3 .,.
iil 0 + '" 01
::l I {;> +
::l --i :::! (;>
5' 0 9: 01
co 9- :::,
:' ~
*-**
~JJ~01
o ([) 00
o ~. 0 m
+ a. + ll>
*~*(J)
..... _ ..... CD
~~2
01 ::l
o _.
o -
JJ
?
" {;> Z Z
c 0 :> :>
"
5'
~
"
'"
'"
Z {;> Z Z z
:> N :> :> :>
0
z{;>
o 01
::l 0
I +
<D {;>
~. Sl!
a.~
'" 0
::l 0
:!'.o
~~
?
JJ{;>
~ ~
c: +
'" {;>
::l 01
=. ::::::
as.
Ol " z {f> 0 {;>
0 ~ 0 CD < Ol
a. ::l c.> ~ N
ll> CD I --.j co
'< <D + 01 +
en '" en {;> c {;>
ll> c: Ol ~. N
;::l> ~ 0
~ (l) en :;:,
::t
~ 0 .."
{;> ~ z {;> {f> {;>
N :> N ~ .,.
0 N 0 .,.
0 01 0 01 0
+
{;>
N
0
iil
0
{f> {f> z
~ ~ ~
0 0 ()
+ + 0
{;> {f> 3
~ 01 '0
0 ll>
iil iil iil
0 0 0'
(ij
{;> tt {;> {;> {;> {;>
c.> N CD CD 0
--.j --.j g: --.j N
0 0 0 0
+ +
{f> {;>
~ .,.
0 ~
C: ll>
C 0
{;>
o
o
+
(;>
N
o
iil
o
.....
~:::i~
.:.:.:.:.:.:-:i:i:(
,:,:::::::,:,:13),:
.....~
I
~j~~jj)jtjI~t
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
~~f@
~E:~i::~
~,:,Ji1l::
""""",:,,;l:f
..
:0/6
g,~:~~g:
~i:i:i~:
.....~
11
m
m
(J)
o
I
)>
:D
G)
m
o
OJ
-<
r
o
o
)>
r
--f
m
(J)
(J)
s:
r
)>
:D
--f
o
)>
r
OJ
m
s:
)>
:D
r
m
"U
ll>
cc
'"
N
..
.
0 >< g >< >< ~ ~ ~ ;><
Ol ;>< :S :S 11
2; :S ~ ~ 9 0 !II ;> !II :-
~ :- ;> 1'> ~ m
(0 :- 0 en 5" )> ...........
CD :D "U r (I) r cO' ." m :0 OJ Ul Q Q '0 < en \l :D m
CD (I) m- ro m- (ii' (3 0 0 '0 .0 C
0 C < ~ ~ 0: '" :J \l '0 ~. 0;- C/)
ro 3 ro en 0. 0. (I) N (I) :J ~
~ a: roO 0' Sl 9 0 ?' g
~r 00 "U < en m s:u s:u -0
a. 00 :J :J
~ :E (I) ~: !Il 0' 3' Vi ~ a; ~ 0
~ 3' ~ 8- 3 0 () "U
co co 0- 8- !!!. Cii 0 3' ~ cc (I) en
"U '< s:u ;:;. Ul > Ul 0: 1ii I
)> .., () o' Iii !?? ?- CD ~
(I) '< Q. CD ;:;. )>
3 :D () 0 ~ en
CD 0 3 ~ :D
;:;: ~ '2.
CD ji;' ...... G)
CD ~ " m
()
~ (I)
() 0
(I)
(;> {/> {/> (;> ~ ~ {/> {/> {/> {/> (;> {/> (;> (;> (/> i~i:i:~ OJ
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -..j -..j 0 0 -<
0 Ul Ul
:~:~:~:::~~:::i!: r
'~:::i:ii::~:~~ 0
0
~jj~t~jjj~1j1I~1 )>
(;> z z {/> {/> {/> z ~ {/> {/> {/> {/> {/> {/> (;> (/> I:::~ r
0 0 :;;: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lB Ul 0 0
3' ::;' 0 -i
0' 0' ,:,:,:,:,:,:,:0:: m
~~ttts~
,,';:,:,:,:,:,:!Z:, C/)
........... C/)
{/> {/> z {/> {/> {/> OJ {/> {/> {/> {/> z (;> (/> II1I s:
0 0 :;;: 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 :;;: -..j -..j
en Ul Ul -
CD r
0.
0 ,:;:,:,:;:,:,:i:D,: )>
:J ttt:lf
en :D
cO' :'1:::1::::,11,'
:J -i
~ 0
(;> ~ z {/> {/> {/> {/> {/> {/> {/> {/> (;> - (/> ~ z z :tF:6
0 :;;: 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 en <5 :;;: :;;: )>
0 Ul c: 0 :;Q.:,:,:,Q::
+ n 0 0 :@l]g) r
~ n ~
CD CD ~::::"O:: OJ
- en 2'
en en ::,:,:':;:::,'i:D,:
.0 2' :J :::::::::::::::':'1:: m
~ = 0.
CD s:
0.
.... )>
'ti:}~ :D
~g:~:::~g; r
;t\:~: m
::::::::::::::~::
{::",t:&::
{/> z {/> {/> {/> ~ {/> {/> {/> {/> ~ ~ ~ (f) {/> :1,:::,
0 :;;: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" N
0 0 0 0 3 ~
+ CD ~ ~l
{/>
~ 0' ;!\::':"':::
1l {/> ""'"",::::0
~ '" lii:li!I!I,11
0
0
3
~ ...........
...........
...........
...........
{/> {/> z {/> z {/> {/> {/> {/> :J {/> z ~ ~ {/> {/> ,tit\<
0 0 :;;: 0 :;;: 0 '" 0 0 n 0 :;;: 0 0 ,:0,:,:,:0,:
Ul 0 0
+ C 0 0 :;C::;::::":':'(':
0. ,:z::::,:~
2 CD .:.w.r:.:.:.:.:.:.:
0. ~,:;:,:,:,:,:,:
~ 3'
n
0
en
Cii
{/> {/> {/> Z Z {/> ~ ~ {/> ~ ~ Z ~ {/> (f) {/> I:::g
0 0 0 :;;: :;;: 0 lB :;;: N '" Ul
Ul 0 3 0
0 0
CD ,:,:,:,:;:;:;:0,:
:,:;:,:::,:::,~,
11111111,11",:I":,!1
~ {/> {/> {/> C' {/> ~ ~ I
0 0 0 '" ~
Ul en 0 0 0
CD I Ul Ul
0.
0 ~
:J ~
1l
~
...........
...........
{/> ~ Z ~ {/> {/> + ~ {/> {/> ~ {/> {/> {/> (;> {/> {/> ~~::~ii1
0 :;;: N N {/> 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 0
Ul Ul Ul ~ ~ N 8
+ 0
~ !Il ~'a.r:5f:
0 {/> tmi:mg~~
i\, 0 N
g: 0 0
<>
en 0 ...........
.0 < ...........
~ a
z .... z .... {/> ~ {/> ~ ~ .... {/> {/> .... {/> z :II~
:;;: N :;;: 0 0 N 0 0 N '" N 0
Ul 0 lB lB lB -I :@l~:::~~
0
0 ~::)g:,
~ ',tttli:f
\l
>
:0
>
OJ ,I::il
(;> {/> ~ {/> {/> .... .... {/> {/> {/> {/> .... {/> {/> (/> z
0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 N ::j Ul N :;;:
Ul Ul 8 -..j Ul
0 0 :0,::::'11)"
Ilill:1
,,,,;,;,,,::::It
...........
\l
'"
cc
CD
'"
..
. .
o
Ol
o
....
~
~
X
()O
ii>:c
(f) 0
(f) 3
:>(1)
~
()
c:
'0
a
Ci'
:J
(f)
*
o
~::::::::~~i:i@:~::
-.......................
-......................
-......................
. ......................
N',}',','"",,::,:,
g \\\it:::
~. ~'::~:~:I:@:i:i:
() "::;::,{,:::::::,,
II
~.~,!:~~
,:,:",,:::,:,~
ii:::::i:i::::~~
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:l/l.:
,:::::,:,:,:,:,:J;:,:
~li~.I~
:::::::~::::::s::
:::::::::::::::::1:,
~IIII
'???i:
~I
~.)i.:
,:,:::,:::,:::lD,:
::::::::::::::m::
I
i{::,~,s~:
.......~.
,:,:;:::,:;::E
~:I.:.I
~:t$::
""",:,:",,0
I
~ :gi'i:S\
::c:::,:::,"":
1:::::&
~Iiill
I
l~ii:1
......f:
:::::::::::J8.:
::::m\iW
*
l\)
01
*
o
z
)>
*
o
*
o
z
)>
*
o
*~.;;p
O~f~lli
~I
0t~~i,:
~ :~ll:
:C::::::lD,;
I
*
o
*
o
"
m
m
(J)
o
I
)>
:n
G)
m
o
OJ
-<
r
o
o
)>
r
-;
m
(J)
(J)
~
r
)>
:n
-;
o
)>
r
OJ
m
~
)>
:n
r
m
.A
...
"
ll>
IC
<II
....
..
~
~ :I: (j) :n [11 !=J 0 ~ ?> (J)
~ - ~ 0 0 0 !'> .... !'> :-" -0
0' 41 CD
(j) iJ ~ :J 5" I\) :J (') :IJ :I: s:: 0
0 8. iil c: <" -< a. jD -< 0 c: iJ )>- 0 iJ )>- 0 eI
Q: c: 3 ~ 3 S!.
S- -0 a. -< I\) CT S: CT (')-0 (')-0
CD Iii ~ 0" CD '< (J) '< 3 f,lo~ CD f,lo~ (j) C
0
-, (J) ::r (J) CD )>- 0 (J)
:J s;; 0 ~ (3 CD CD~ CD 0 :I: CD
c: C iJ 0 :0 0 < 0
(J) c: 0 iii" I\) 0 & 0 0 & iJ
CD :J ;:::;: CT (J) pi 3" - (J) c: (J) 3 CD
(J) (i)' - 0 -0 CD 3
S- ~ CD ~ c: I\) I\)
(J) (J) iil (J) <" :IJ a. !a :IJ a.
CD ~ c: CD 00" CD 3 0" ~ ~. ;=
CD a. a. <
0' 0" CD (J) 0" (i)' ?' :J (i)'
!!!. (J) ~ :J :J
0" ~ 0' a. 0' (J) ~ (') ~
CD iU
:J a. ~ I\) ~ (J)
~ CD '< & (J)
iil CD
-..j
00
o
m
(0
o
00
....
o
~
o
~
o
(0
(0
o
01
mcu
00
-..j
00
o
o
o
....
o
o
1\)1\)
0101
....
CU
o
m
01
m
01
m
01
m
01
CU
....
.Jl.
I\)
o
-..j
00
.Jl.CU
I\)
o
~
m
CU
(0
o
.Jl.
o
o
I\)
00....
001
.Jl.
o
o
CU
01
o
.Jl.
o
o
01
o
o
CU
(0
o
CU
(0
o
.Jl.
o
01
I\)
00
001
.Jl.
o
01
.Jl.
o
01
.Jl.
(0
01
~
01
CU
(0
o
01
00
01
01
....
00
01
00
01
-..j
.Jl.
CU
.Jl.
1\)1\)
ocu
m
o
00
m
o
00
m
o
00
-..j
00
o
01
m CU
00
m
(0
o
~
o
00
....
o
~
o
-..j
00
o
(0
(0
o
:IJ
Jg
c:
CD
(J)
I\)
a.
~
o'
:J
~
CD
:J
lO
3"
CD
~.
:J
lO
~.
CD
~
g,
::r
'<
a.
iil
c:
0"
o
I\)
o
c:
~
0"
:J
!Il
:J5"~<g
I\) .... :J ~
:J(Oo.
~~~
~CUI\)
I\)-..jo.
~'3-3
o g, :J
~s:~
o l): 21
- CD <"
~~ ~
00 -, c:
-0 ~" :J
CD - -
;;; ~ ~
'0 CD I\)
~m:J
o ::r I\)
!!!.1\),9,
-" :J 0
g 9: 3"
& 3'
lO
~~
~" .g
~" CD
(J) ~
~'<
!!!.o
<" ~
~~
-.., 0
l):.2:
s.~
g.~
lO
I\)
ocu
00
1\)1\)
0101
....00
cucu
....
0....
001
o
001
....
011\)
OCU
I\)
o CU
00
CT 3' 5" :I:
CD I\)
(J) I\) :J
c::J~o.
~~;~
N" lOl\) a.
&CD'3-3
CTOg,:J
~~s:!!
lam~
(')~CD<
o -..j -0 ~
c: OCD'<
;:t-03C:
'< CD _" :J
~.~ ~ ~
0-0 CD I\)
~g-CD:J
:::l 11> ::r I\)
g.g.I\),9,
_" .., :J 0
(j) :-' 9: 3'
::r .... & 3'
0.... lO
3~~-o
l): 0 3 0
(J) 3 3'-0
CD 3 -. ~
<: CD !!l. -
CD:J-''<
a. !a 0
I\) -" ~
(')S-(6:J
o!a-<~
3-0-0
-0 I\) -, CT
CD ;:1 m _.
::Jos.~
~ ;::g"~
!!1" i5 lO
(6 ~
iJo
~~
(J)
~::::@@I%i:::~~~~~: ()
.......lr....O
1111111111111~iillllll:llllll~
..................
.................
mm~~~:~~~::rrr~:r~~ 0
:~::::::t:{{~tt~~,~, II
.................
..................
.................
\i\\\\\\\ "U
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~
..................
...................................-
~ffff~}}}:f 0
.................
...................................-
~,~,\\\::\~\:\i z
~~}}~~~~}~~~~}~ff (j)
.................
..................
mfm}~fffff C/)
tttttt':tt: m
.................
~\~\\\\\\\: :D
tt:,,',~,',{~t~:':,',:' <
.................
...................................-
f'r:'}r:ffmr ()
::::{:tt,~t~~,~,,:~t m
::::::~~:ttttt:~t C/)
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
1111:11111111
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..........................""".
}}:~~~:~:r~~~~~~~M:
.................
}},~:~:~$.}m:~:
II
111:1:~jll:li
,:ah",~,,"".~':::..:,
::::!l.::::::""':::::: '.::
:-::{t.::.-::
..-...... ...... .'.
Iii
............. .
............. .
............. ..
............. .
............. ..
............. .
............. ..
............. .
............. ..
.............. .
............. ..
.......................... ....
............. .
.............. .
............. .
.....-........ ..
............. .
............. ..
............. .
............. ..
::::::::::::::::::~:::::::i~~:
il:i:il'li:11
..................
...................................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.................
..................
...................................
...................................
:::i:i:::i:i:i:::::::':i:'i~
11111:11:1:1,1
:~:~~:::':'~:::~:~:~~::~I'
:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,::10:,:
..................
.................
111111illll:11
lillli:11111111111111
~I::::I~:::I':'
::t:'
rt
rt
lJJ
()
::J
8
(1)
::l
rt
()
iJ
I\)
lO
CD
..
.
o (/)
:J ~ ~
-g ::r (j)
(3 g: ~
!Q.(,.)<
a.!Q.
a.0
~~
_CD
:J
:J -
CO ."
iU
:J
:E
su
<'
~
9
!J
2-su
Q~
CD ....
=:su
3:g
'0 ....
iU~
-!:!!.
~
01
(,.)
a
m
a
.....
.....
a
!II
!"
::!!
-6"~
~cn
0;::;:
< CD
~."
su iU
a.:J
3 (/)
?'
~
~cn
.,,~
CD ."
=:iU
3 :J
S' (/)
su
-<
en
;=
."
iU
:J
(/)
!II
~~
~ 0
a.=r
3 CD
CD ....
:J N
(i)g
S'
co
s::
su
'0
~>
O-n3
CD 0 CD
a3 .... :J
O'."a.
uiU3
3 5 ~
~~(ij
en 0-
=r
CD
N
o
:J
:J
co
s::
su
'0
!I'
2-0'
u!!t
CD Q
=:CD
3 su
''0
Uu
iU3
- <
!:!!.
::;:
~
(D'
~
~
0'
'<
."
()
.....
I\)
m
a
01
I\)
a
~
~ I\)
01
01 01
+ +
!! (,It
.....
- iii"
su
0 0 01
CD m CD I\)
01 a
I\)
a
O1C
a:J
+ a.
su ~
fl 01
(;ia
N~
g:~
00
.....
01
~
O1C
a:J
+ a.
su ~
fl 01
(;ia
N~
g:~
~
01
m
(,.)
a
<0
a
a
(,.)
~
~ .". m .". m
a 01 m (,.) a I\)
00 01 a (,.) a 00 00
.". m I\) <0 ~ ~
~ ...... ...... .". .".
(,.) 01 .". 01 .....
~ m <0 (,.) I\) ~ I\)
(,.) a I\) m 01
01 a a 01 a 01 01
Jl
~
o
3
3
CD
:J
a.
a.
~
CD
su
!!!.
:J
co
CD
CD
0'
CD
o
~
~
o
:J
-<
01
a
'&
2-
=r
CD
o
o
!!!.
(,.)
a
a
......
I\)
a
I\)
m
a
.".
00
00
a
00
a
ZJl
o CD
:J (/)
10:
CD CD
!!!. :J
~~
(;i~
<001
<01\)
aa
(,.)
I\)
a
.".
01
a
m
a
Jl
~
o
3
3
CD
:J
a.
a.
~
CD
su
!!!.
:J
co
CD
CD
0'
CD
"
o
<
~
o
:J
-<
01
a
'&
2-
=r
CD
o
o
~
Jla.a.Jl
~ ~ ~ ~
0!Q.!Q.0
300 3
~~~~
:J CD CD :J
0.3. 3. a.
CD ~ ~ i
a. a.;::;: 0
~(,It::r:::!:
5. ...... su &
coa:J_
CD~~lE
CD .... a. !II
_......;:::;:.LJa.
o a 0' ~
....a:J1\)
~~!:!!.a
~.g g.Q'
~ ~ D>> ~
o CD cO 3:
:J CD--
CDOa.
-<sa-~
~ 0 (,It~_
'&-o!:!!.
:J u su
2-0CD:J
~ 7 """' a.
CDCD5ts
8~;::;:~
~CD~_
~ CD Q
~(/):J
a.o:o
CD :J
~ ~.!.
!Q. iii' CD
o - (/)
u 0:
~ ~
~ ~
2-su:Ja.Jl
01 CD 0 ~. ~
a CD a. 0 (D'
~2-~~~
CD....(,It-~:J
(/)000 0
.....::rCDc
Q01SU=ra.
3Qa3~'m
~ CD 8 ~ !!!,
g~~~
:J CD '< iU
co:::!:O:J
(/) ~ ~
o - -. i_,
-_co
CD ::r :J CD
g:CDCO~
-~32-
~~Q~
:J CDU
01 g.:;: =
a_suo
su::r:J!!!.
o CD -.
m CD Q g
(/)NoU
su 0 0 iU
a ~ ~ ::'
(,It!.O ~ 0
~~~O
g:~g~
Q~!:!!.~
o CD iii'
CD3~::r
~ 3 2.0'
:J CD :J
S' a'f;1
co .
(/)
.............'0.:(.......... '"'
:- rmmm~/m?? .."
2- > ))))~:m))~:: 0
- 3 :::::::::::::;5::::::::::::::: C/)
::r CD {':"':':'~:::'::::""'" ---I
CD :J ,:,:,:::,:::,:::,:::::::,:::::,:,:, -,
a. ................. C/)
~ 3 ::::::::::::~::'~:~::~:::::::::I
~- ~:ii:::i::ii::::iiiii:i:iiiiiiii:ii~ ~
Q 0' ~:~~~~~~~~~:~:~::~:~:::::::I:::: "U
I" ;111:1111111"'::::1'1":::111.111: ~
~ ~:::::::::::::::::::::::i:i:::i::iiio
))))))))i z
:::::'::::::::::::::::::t::::::: G)
:ii:iiiii:iiiiiiiiii:ii::i:i::::::~~
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~
\:rr:\:rrrr m
:1:1:1:111.111:1:111:1:1111'..i:..1 C/)
m:i:::~:~:::::I:~:~4:
m:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.I::
01 :I:~II::::::I
~:~r:~::::::r:~:::~:B:
~:~:~::i:i::~:$.::::i::
ffi @\I~:{g~
.
.I..s........
:~::::::~::::::~:
01::::1::'.11
II
..........................0:..
r:~rrrrr3i
i~~1~~~::11i~:::::i:1:ii::I~.
..............m....Q.:.
ffi .I::::~;:i::mi
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.......................ffi
mmmmmm??iii'
:,:,:,:,:::,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,CD:::
rill
:,:,:,:,:::,:,:,:,:,:,:,Cl:::
~11111111:illi
,:::,:,ttttJ:ir,
1:lllil'lil'llll:il:11
.............,0;....0...
ffi 'I::il::::~:ii
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
il
3 ,:,:::::,:,:,:::::::,:,::::1;:,
CD :,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,~,:
:J ,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:}~!.,:,
a. :,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:
..................
.................
:J ,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,
0,:,:"::,,,:,:::,:,:,:::,:,:,:,:,:,
o :~,',:,~,::':':':f:,',t~,~:~,
::r ,:,:,:,:,:,:,:::::::::::::,::::::::
su :,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:::,:,:,:
c5 ~~~~m:m:m:m:m:m:~{~~
.Sl! "",:,',:,::ff~,~:~:::::::::
~ :I::~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~~~:~::::'
~ :::1:::::::1:1:1:::::::::::1:i:1:1:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U """"""":"":;:::;:::;::""
5- ~~;~~~~~{~Im:m:iim:m:
5'tt:ttttt~t
.................
g .:::::::::::::::::::::::i::::::::::
~':~:i:I:li::I':::':~..:ili:,i::~:i"
C :,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:
1111...:..1~:'~:I:,.I":lllI111il:i
. ...................................
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
...................................
.................
...................................
..................
.................
..................
,.~II.:IIIIII:III.I.I.I:::::::::::I
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
................-..................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
-.-.-.-...........................-
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
II
."
su
co
CD
I\)
. ~
?> C/) !=l
~ !" CD !" ......
41 c: >
< CT
N (5" ~ a. ~ s:: l>> en " ;; 3
0 a. N" l>>
+ 0 0' ~ <" 3 ~ (I)
3 -" l>> .!D :J :J
0' ~ iii' (I) _.
0' ~ ~ :S' ~ a.
CD :J o' :J g 3
iii CD O'CTl>> :J CT !! !.O
(j)'<~ '< ... ~ l>> .' (I)
0' -0 -o.2l ~ ~" ~ :J
iii :7-0 ji) () c: <' 0" 0 iii
(I) ji) iii (I) ? c: ~ 0'
-0 iii CD -< eI
() en :I: 0" C/)
l>> o' :J ;:
:J :J en
a. 0 0' -0
~ CT ji)
a:
cp :J
OCDen
0) CD 0)
000)
NN
0) 0) 0)
ooen
Ne.>......
en 0"""
en~N
e.>~CD
000
en~N
e.>~CD
ooe.>
-....Io)~
CDo)N
enoen
oCDen
0) CD 0)
000)
@:Q
m~
CD ~
::J _
;~
... ()
(I) ::T
l>> l>>
~cO
o (I)
-" ~
3.~
en 0
0'_
~~
~~
3 iii"
o 0"
CD ::J
l>> iii'
()
g Q
~ ~
mQ
-<3
:70
(I) CD
g 0'
!!!.~
:S" JJ
~1Il
ai 0
0.3
3
(I)
::J
a.
c:
en
:S"
ce
~
en
-....I
en
e.>
o
e.>
o
0)
o
~
o
......
......
o
~
o
o
CD
e.>
CD
~
en
0)
N
......
en
-....I
en
JJ
1Il
o
3
3
(I)
::J
a.
CD
a.
c:
()
5"
ce
a>
(I)
0'
~
~
~
o
::J
-<
en
o
-s.
9-
:7
(I)
()
o
~
t:i~:::::~I:~:~~:~:::::: (')
.......1i.......0
....... .......
......... ........
....... .......
....... ........
....... ........
....... ........
............... .............. C/)
:::::::::il:IIIIIIII.III,!.!.@
..................
.................
~~~r~:~t~rmt:r:m 0
((:,:::::::::::,(((~ "TI
.................
..................
.................
))))))))i '"U
1111111111111:1:::I:::::li:lilll:ii~
;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.:-
ttt~rmmrrr 0
.................
tt~~tt:~mm::tm z
i:irrrrritt:ii G)
.................
..................
.................
::::::::::::::i:i::::i:ii:iii:::::~~
)))i:~:':)':)i( :D
((:::::::::::::::::~~:::::::: <
.................
...................................-
rrrrrrmtt (')
:::::::(("",,:,,:((~~ m
))))))))~:~ en
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
II!::IIIIIII
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
...................................
.................
...................................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
..................
,~:~~~~~~~J(JJ6.~
,:,:,:::::::::::,:,:,:,:,:C,:,
.............~.
:~)))fflI~?
.......m...<:ll.
."'.......... ......... '.'
. .. ... ..
. .. '''....-'
I
~it$~~rg~
,m,:"'m.~""".~.:::..:,
. ... ... .
..::iI....... ...... ...
,~""'at' ':,
.
.............8.
............. .
............. .
............. ..
............. .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::1::
1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilil
.......lB....~.
....... ... .
....... ... .
.~..........., ..........
.' ..... .........
. .. ... .
..................
...................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.;.:.:.:.:
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
:':':':':':':':':':':':';'iiJj'
:::::::::::~:::~:~:~~~:~:~m~~:
111111111:i,1
.............1.
......"..... ...
............. ..
iiiiii~~~tt~f~[!i~1;:: .~~
:,:,:,:::,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,c:"
III
:::'I.:::i:i':I'!.:'I'
.......g..~.
....... .. ..
....... .....
il~~~:I::::~::
..................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
...................................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
..........................~.....
............... .
............. ..
.............. ..
.......................... .'.
............. .
............. ..
............. .
............. ..
............... .
............. ..
:::~:::::::It:~:::~:3:::
rrttt:::~:~~r
.............~.
............. .
.............. .
............. ..
............. .
............. ..
I
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
::;;;;;;;;;::::;;;;;;;;;:::;:::::::
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
r~;~:~;f~:t~:~:~:~:~;~:~;!
.................
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
;:;:::;:;;::;:;:;:::;;;:;:;:::;:::;
...................................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
...................................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
~~~~~~~~~~~fj~j~mmrmm
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
..................
.................
...................................
...................................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
...................................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
.................
..................
.................
...................................
..................
.................
..................
.................
...................................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;::::::::::::
.................
..................
.................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
..................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
..................
jjijijijjijj~j~1~Ir~~~~~~~~~~
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
::::!:::::::::::::::::::::i::::::::
:::::;:;:::;:::;:::::::::::::::::::
-0
l>>
ce
(I)
e.>
!=' 0 !II
-0 JJ ~ :E ~ P !'> :-'" II
(")
0 ~ C III (") ~ )> ~ ?' !ll JJ ::l
::l !: CD e::' 0 a. I\) .....Jg ~
CD ::l CD 3 .....
u - 3 .... a. 3 0 0 0' ~. -0
![ 0 9- 0 5' + ii)
CD "E- O' ....
Q 3 ::l en 3 III 0' co ::l (ij
(ij u (ij ..... CCO
(") C ::l ![ U co
u 0 CJ C u 0' (ij -0
ii) ::l a. 3 0 (")
::l a. e::' < (ij
;::+ iii' u ~ III
<5" ![ u
::l o' u
en ::l 0
CJ <
'< ~
.".
o
.....
..... 00001
.". 00 I\) ...... mCXlm
0 0 0 01 00 m
+
~
~(,.)
ffi ffi ..... (,.) -co
01 0 go
m
01
.".
m
.".
m
~
.".
o
......
01
(,.).".m
.......".co
......
o
.".
o
01""1\)
(,.).".00
000
......
o
o
.".
o
......
o
01""1\)
(,.).".00
00(,,)
.".
o
......
o
.....
o
(,.)
00
o
01
......m.".
0 m ..... 01 com I\)
01 0 01 m 01001
.....
..... 00001
.". 00 I\) ...... mCXlm
0 0 0 01 00 m
.....
.".
o
JJ JJ
1Il 1Il
0 0
3 3
3 3
CD CD
::l ::l
a. a.
~ ~
c c
(") (")
S' 5'
co co
(j) (j)
CD CD
0' 0'
~ ~
~ ~
~ CD
....
0 0
::l ::l
-< -<
01 01
0 0
-s. -s.
9- 9-
S- S-
CD (I)
(") (")
~ 0
~
:::II::I:::::"::::i: ()
.......m......O
......... ........
........ .......
....... ........
....... ........
....... ........
............. .............. C/)
illll::I'\II.II:\\:.\\::..:i. cri
..................
.................
}}m{~~~:~~~~mm{~: 0
~,,:::((((((::::' "TI
.................
..................
.................
~~~r~~r,:,:,rrr:r "U
1IIIIIIIIIIIIIilllli:II:I:lllllllii~
..................
...................................-
(((((~ti~tt 0
.................
...................................-
rrrr:::rrrr z
{{,,:}}}}}} Ci)
..................
:.::~:~:~~i~i:i:::ii:::::i:::::::i:~
rrrrrrrr::: :D
~i:::::t~'::~':i~@:i::~i~~::: <
:::rrrrrrrr ()
",((:,:,(((::(~~ m
~~~~~rrrrrri::: C/)
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
Ililllllllll
..................
...................................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
':':':':':':':':':':':':':;;i;j;;'
:r~:rr~ff"~~:
.................
m~ff?i'Is.~~
......m...::I.
.~......................
. .. ... ..
. .. "'JII!'r.'
.
I'~"'l:l;'
.",.. ... .
,':./,: .""":0....::,:,
. '"0''' ..
~!:1:i:~:i::t~.::..:j
:_::ill:,::. ::
.._.....~.... .'.
II
.............$.
............. .
............. .
............. .
............. ..
............. .
II
.......m..""..
~I:t:}:~~~i:
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
..........................i.....
............. .
I
:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:::,:::,:,UlI:,:
11:1::llllilll
,}}}}~:~,~,~,~(f;
:.i:i'l:iii~I:lilllil.
.............1....1...
....... .....
....... .. ..
....... .. .
............ ..
....... ... .
........ .. ...
~Il::::::,,::i~::
..................
.................
...................................
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
iilil:iilil:iil:ili:ill..'illllllll
~j~j~j~[~;~[~I\f~1~~~ft
:;:;:::;:;~;~;:;:;~;~;~;~;I:
~)~~::~:::r::)~~~3~~:
)))~::{{mG{
,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:::,:,:,:0,:,
::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::
I
:1:1'111:1':':.1111::1.::li::lillli
..........................
~{(f~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~{{:rrrr~:~:?~
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
~1~[~[~~~~~~~~jjjjjjjljjjjjj~j~j~j[
111:1111:I:ill:li\:i'lil.:.I'I'I'11
~~i:i~:I:I::I::i:~'i:.'~I..:.~:::ii
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::
::ii':'i'ii:'il:'il:'i:i.:.::i':::'
g
~~fftf)jI}~
:i:i:i:::i:i:i:i:i:i:::::::1:1i1i1:
rrrrmrtIt
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.;.;.;.:.;.;.
jr~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ij~
-0
III
co
CD
.".
..
~
)>~
a.)>
3"0
:2: ~
en ll)
~'iii
!!!.O
o -
......N
en 0
o.::l
~ 5"
_" 10
en
0"
::l
CD
01
I\)
01
I\)
m
01
o
-""
CD
::1
CD
01
x
:<
<
~
iii'
::l
o
CD
en
~
~ ~m
5' [\) .... 3d~
en :D (') ll) -.
"OmO::lg
~-"3:D(')
g:g.3~o
::l ::l CD -. ::l
cn~o~a
!!!. iii" -
>(;;
10 _.
.., -
-" CD
g en
2'
~
(,)-""0
000
I\)-...j-...j
010101
CDCD-...j
(')CD01
1\)1\)01
0100
....1\)01
0100
I\)(,)-...j
(,)001
....
(,)-""0
000
:D :D :D ~ :D
~ ~ CD ~
0 c:
0 0 0 52" 0
3 3 3 ::l 3
3 3 3 10 3
CD CD CD :7 CD
::l ::l ::l ::l
a. a. a. 00' a.
CD ~ ::l m 0'
0 g:
2' 0 CD
::l c: ::T - 5"
0 010
a. 5' I>>
!2. ::l ~ m
10 10
m m CD ~ CD
CD CD ::l CD Q
- 0 m ..,
0 ~.
N ~ CD ::l
0 0' -<
::l CD
:;;. 0 .., (.'1 ::e
<
10 ~ :;;. e' :;;.
)> en "0 10
a. 0 "0 CD "0
3 ::l ~ 0 ii)
-< CD
::l o' 3- ::l
~ 01 en
0 ::l 0 0
.., "I- !Jl - ::l
ll)
0 !2. 3-S-
.., CD CD
en- :7 0 en
a. CD ~ j;j"
~ 0 CD
0 !2.
00" ~
o' "0
::l ..,
00' .2.
0 ~
< -
~ ll)
::l
C a.
:3
~
CD
01
m
01
m
CD
01
o
-""
CD
::1
CD
01
~~:::::::::~~I%II:: (')
.......1......0
......... ........
............... ...............
....... ........
mmff. Jffm (J)
....... ........ -i
::::::::~:::t::~::::::::::::::~~ C/)
..................
.................
~~~~ttmr::rr~:~~~: 0
~::III:::@~::~~::::~~:~ ."
t:::~:::'t~~~\\\\ "'U
:i:lllllilllllillllllllllillllllili~
:~:~:~~::~:::::::~:~~:~~II:': 0
.................
l'i..:!:I!::.:.!:I.:.:,~:!!:::::!::~
..~'i':.:i:::i::::i:::::::il::::lil~
//////itt :D
t:~:~:::~:~:::~~~:~,~,~~\"" <
.................
...................................-
iII~:::I::IIII (')
::::\:::::~::\:::t:\i m
,tt:~:~:////:t C/)
.................
..................
.................
:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::
..................
.................
1I1I1111I1I1
:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
...................................
~:~tI::t~~~~~r8:
::!:::::!:::::M.:~i:i~i
......m...a.
.i0........... ............
. ..... ...... ','
. .. ." .
. ... ......
.................
...................................
..................
.................
..................
.................
...................................
..................
:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::::::::;:::::
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..............:>>..............
~'e::::':::i? }::i.~
. ...1........
::.. li .. ?mg;~
,g"",:' ::'::"1':::":'
,'ZI::{ ':"'~' .:,
.-..:ilj:,.....
i<=~':':a::':,' .:,
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
:::::::::::;:::;:::;:;:;:::;:::::::
..................
.................
...................................
..................
...................................
.................
...................................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
:,:,:))::,:),\:>>,:
..........................~..
.......................... .'
............. ..
............. .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::1::
~:::~::'~~~:~~~~::::::::::g:~
il.I:I:lill:
...................................
..................
.................
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
...................................
.................
..................
..........................$.....
............. .
rt~~~~~~~~~~~~Ir. :;j)
II
:,:,:,:,:,:,:::,:,:,:,:,:IC/:::
il:1111111111
{{,:,:::::",~,~,,:~~::{'
111:::1::":.:1:1.::1.
':':':':':':"I":':~":'
....... .. ..
....... .. .
............ ..
....... .. .
....... .....
'l:i'L::}::~~t
..................
.................
..................
.................
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
...................................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
..........................~.....
............. ..
............. ..
i'I:'lii'!III'lllillllllli~.!
:::,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,CI:l:,:
"""},:"",:"":,,,i:J.,,
.............f.ii:.
.............. .
............. ..
I
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
~{m;~;~;~~~~~~~~~~rm~r
.................
...................................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.:.:.:.;.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
...................................
::;:;:;:;:::;:::::;::::::::::::::::
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.;.;.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.;.;.
..................
..,.........................,......
.................
..................
.................
;.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.;.;.;
;;:;:;:;:::::::::::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
...................................
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:;:;
..................
.................
:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;=;=
mmmmmmrmmmt
-0
ll)
10
CD
01
.
>
a.
g,
c)'
::J
CIl
CIl
::T
0
C
a:
::J
sa.
C'
CD
0
::T
ll)
cO
~
2'
::J
CD
~
ll)
'0
"Q.
o.
~
0
::T ::J
CD CD
0 !l>
~
2.
~
I::~::::::&:~:~:~:::@ ()
......._......0
......... ........
....... .......
....... ........
....... ........
....... ........
ff:~f.. )fft c/)
...... .......-i
::::~:::~:~:~::~~~~:::::::::::~~::: c/)
..................
.................
mm:m:~m::~~m:m:m:m: 0
,,(((((:::::::t:~ "TI
.................
..................
.................
rI~
...................................-
::iffirrrffm 0
l:i"'lili.I.111.i,i,1::i1:::.::~:'~
.................
..................
~~~::I~.:.ii::i:i:i:i;i:iliii:iii::~
~~ff~t~f~~~~~~f~t JJ
,~:::;(:\ttt\t <
:i~i:~:::i:::::::::::I::::::I ()
~~~((~:((::,':,(( m
'tt~~~ffff:::t (J)
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.:.;.;.:
.................
..................
.................
II:i:1111111
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
tt::::::ii:~:~~~~:~~a:
::::,:,:,:,:,:,:;:;:;:;:;:C,:,
.................
:rmmmfflImr
I
'~""I""""""'"
..... ....0..
'. ..:.:.' '.:.:.: .':'
;...;:;:;:';:;:;:~:
';':::":""':::1":::":'
:,::3;:,:,:, :,:;:, '.::
:-::$'::' ::
..-..... ...... .'.
!<<:,:,:,' '::,:, . ',:
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
...................................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
\::::'::,',:;:,:;;;'i3:i.~
.............1.
............. .
............. .
............. .
.......................... '.'
............. ..
:rrr~:}~:~;~;i . .:~:
.............. ..
............. .
............. .
............. .
............. ..
............. .
............. .
II
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
}}}}}i<I:"":":
............. .
)j~j~jr~~rr~rr :~~~
'lil.II:::11
I
1'1'11'1:'11"1.111111
.......#..2.
....... .. .
. . . . . .. .. ... . .
. . . . . . . . . .
....... .....
~W:JL::,:~~~~~~::
..................
.................
..................
:;:;:;:;:;:::;:::::::::::;:;:;:;:;:
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
.................
..................
111.111111!11:lilililil:::;1
.............;l
::::::::.:::i~::~::::::~~:~,::
............. .
............. .
.............. .
............. ..
............. .
............. .
;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;
I
:;:;:;:;:::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:
..................
.................
..................
.................
...................................
...................................
..................
.................
..................
.................
...................................
..................
.................
~j~j~j~j~j~~~~~~~tI~r~~~~~
~II~)~~~~~~~~~~j~j~j~ff
II
""C
ll)
<0
CD
0>
IATTACHMENT III
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that a fee is hereby established for Comprehensive Plan amendments by amending
and reenacting Paragraph No. 2 of the POLICY FOR SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSED AMEND-
MENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, to read as
follows:
2. Comprehensive Plan amendment applications may be filed at the Depart-
ment of Planning and Community Development on or before the first Tuesday,
respectively, of~e months of March and September. The application should be
?ccompanied by cash or a check made payable to the "County of Albemarle, Virgin-
ia," in the amount of three hundred and fifteen dollars ($315.00).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that fees are hereby established for items as set
out below:
Request to amend service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service
Authority to include property for water and/or sewer service - $130.00; however,
no fee shall be charged for emergency requests when public safety is an issue.
Request to abandon roads which mayor may not have been a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways - $135.00.
AND FURTHER RESOLVED that these fees shall be effective on and after
. 1992.
" ...
o R DIN A NeE
An Ordinance to amend and reenact
Section 18-43, Fees, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land,
of the Code of Albemarle
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of A~l. a \le County, Virginia,
that Section 18-43, Fees, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Lan fo I he Code of
Albemarle, be amended and reenacted, as follows: ' ,
Sec. 18-43. Fees.
(a) Preliminary plat. The subdivider shall pay a fee at the time when
the preliminary plat is filed. Such fee shall be in the form of cash or a
check payable to the "County of Albemarle, Virginia," the amount thereof to be
determined in accordance with the following schedule:
f i ,- -!f-ht-ee- -It){s - or- less- - -s1.ox-ty-ftye - amlM"S-. - -
f 2,- - Ftffi'r" 1.0~ ~r -mm-e- -- two- w!\ af'ett- "S'ixty- tlollafos- -rrJ:ug- "'Ofte' -aOHfl'f""' per
}o{-. -
( 1) For review by the Commission:
a. One to nine lots, five hundred sixty-five dollars ($565.00).
b. Ten to nineteen lots, eight hundred eighty dollars ($880.00).
c. Twenty or more lots, one thousand sixty dollars ($1,060.00).
(2) Each filing of a preliminary plat, whether or not a preliminary
plat for the same property has been filed previously, shall be subject to the
same requirements.
(b) Final plat. The subdivider shall pay a fee at the time the final plat
is filed. Such fee shall be in the form of cash or a check payable to the
"County of Albemarle, Virginia," the amount thereof to be determined in accor-
dance with the following schedule:
( 1) Commission approval: -Three- w!\a-red- -ninety- .doH~rs- ,-f)ftts- ~ne
amlM- 'Pef'" -It){ ':"-
a. One to nine lots, five hundred sixty-five dollars $565.00).
b. Ten to nineteen lots, eight hundred eighty dollars ($880.00).
c. Twenty or more lots, one thousand sixty dollars ($1,060.00).
(2) Administrative approval, including family divisions: t:fth-ty--
seventy-five dollars ($75.00).
(3) Exempt plat: Wfee!\ Twenty dollars ($20.00).
(4) Condominium plat: -S~~-:H~ Eighty dollars ($80.00).
,0"'- ..
"
An Ordinance to amend and reenact
Section 18-43, Fees, Chapter 18, Subdivision of Land
Page 2
(5) In addition to the foregoing, in the case of any plat on which
is shown any road to be dedicated to public use, or any private road, the sub-
divider shall pay to the county a fee equal to the cost of the inspection of
the construction of any such road. Such fee shall be paid upon completion of
all necessary inspections and shall be deemed a part of the cost of
construction of such road for the purposes of section 18-19.
(c) Waiver request of subdivision requirement: -5i~-ty-fiYe One hundred
forty dollars ($140.00).
(d) Relief from conditions by Commission on plat: One hundred forty
dollars ($140.00).
(e) Appeal of plat to board of supervisors: One hundred ninety dollars
($190.00).
(0 Redating of plat, approved and not recorded: Ten dollars ($10.00).
(g) Change in road or development name after submittal of plat:
( 1) Change in road name: Fifteen dollars ($15.00).
(2) Change in development name: Twenty dollars ($20.00).
(h) Extending approval of plat: Thirty-five dollars ($35.00).
0) Granting request to defer action on plat to:
(1) A specific date: Twenty-five dollars ($25.00).
(2) Indefinitely: Sixty dollars ($60.00).
(D Bonding inspection for plat: Forty-five dollars ($45.00).
(k) Request to board of supervisors to vacate a plat: One hundred thirty-
five dollars ($135.00.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this ordinance shall be effective on and after
, 1992.
-' .
o R DIN A NeE
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Sections of the Code of Albemarle
Related to Fees
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that Section 2.1-2 of Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, of the
Code of Albemarle, in subsection (c), is hereby amended and reenacted to read as
follows:
(c) Each -such application for creation of an agricultural and forestal
district shall be accompanied by a fee of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00).
No fee shall be charged for adding parcels to an agricultural and forestal
district, or for reviewing an existing agricultural and forestal district.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Section 7-4 of Chapter 7, Erosion and
Sedimentation Control, of the Code of Albemarle, is hereby amended and reenacted
in subsection (d) to read as follows:
(d) Upon the submission of any plan submitted pursuant to section 7-3, the
applicant shall pay to the county a fee of-~tw-ent-y-f-iYe-forty dollars to cover
the cost to the county to review and to act upon ~h soil erosion plans for
residential or agricultural sites; and one hundred dollars ($100.00) to review
and act upon such plans for all other sites. For each erosion control inspec-
tion necessitated by this plan, a fee of tweflty-f~-thirty dollars ($30.00)
shall be paid by the applicant. The maximum fee chargeable under this section,
inclusive of inspections, shall not exceed three--ftliflmw one thousand
($1,000.00) dollars.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that Section 9 of the Water Resources Protection
Ordinance be amended and reenacted in subsection (c) and subsection (d) to read
as follows:
Sec. 9. Water Quality Impact Assessment.
(c) Minor Water Quality Impact Assessment:
A minor water quality impact assessment shall be required for any
development which results in land disturbance of greater than two thousand five
hundred (2500) square feet but less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet
within resource protection areas and requires any modification or reduction of
the landward fifty (50) feet of the one hundred (100) foot buffer area. A minor
assessment must demonstrate that the remaining buffer area and necessary best
management practices will effectively achieve pollutant removal equivalent to
the one hundred (100) foot buffer. A request for a minor assessment shall
include a site drawing, accompanied by a fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) in the
form of cash or a check made payable to the "County of Albemarle", to scale
which shows the following:
,.
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Sections of the Code of Albemarle Related to Fees
Page 2.
(d) Major Water Quality Impact Assessment:
A major water quality impact assessment shall be required for any
development which results in ten thousand (10,000) square feet of land distur-
bance or greater within resource protection areas and requires modification or
reduction of the landward fifty (50) feet of the one hundred (100) foot buffer
area. A request for a major water quality impact assessment shall be accompa-
nied by a fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) in the form of cash or a check made
payable to the "County of Albemarle", and shall include the elements listed for
a minor water quality impact assessment, and the following additional informa-
tion:
AND FURTHER RESOLVED that this ordinance shall be effective on and after
, 1992.
. 1_--
:"""..jUi~-/.<ri/J~~-v ,,'(
n,z~
POLICY FOR SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSED AMEN[MENTS
TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
1. Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, made by citizens, shall
be reviewed twice annually. The Planning Cornmis:;:,ion or the Board of
Supervisors may initiate a Comprehensive Plan amendment study at any time
deemed appropriate.
~. Comprehensive Plan amendment applications may be filed at the
Department of Planning and Community Development on or before the first
Tuesday, respectively, of the months of March and September.
It shall be the responsibility of the citizen requesting a Compre-
hensive Plan amendment to submit, in wriGing, the following: A response
to each of the criteria specified in this report, including justification
for the reques~ed change (criteria are out~ined herein as items A through
c). An application form should be prepared by the Department of Planning
and Community Development, surn-Inarizing the guidelines of each criteria
poinG and providing a framework for a written response to be prepared by
the applicant. This application in full would then be submitted directly
to Ghe Planning Corr~ission for determination regarding the adoption of a
resolution of intent to amend Ghe Comprehensive Plan. Should the Planning
COIT~ission adopt a resolution of intent, the applicaGion would then be
forwarded to staff and the Site Plan Review Committee as applicable.
If additional information is required, it is the responsibility of
v. applicant to submit this information to the Planning Department in
a timely fashion. Additional information may include, but is not limited
to: slope studies, soil studies, engineering calculations and profiles,
preliminary site development plans, etc. The applicant will be informed
of what specific items are required prior to the scheduled Site Plan
Review COIT@ittee mee~ing.
j. NotiCE of C8mprehensive Plan ameDdment sJbmission shall be se~t
by first class ma~l to the last known addresE of all owners of the property
ad~acel1: to the s~bjec~ pr8per~y. In any caSE in which the app~lcant cw~s
the ad~acE~t property, no~ice shall be given ~o the owners of the next
a~Jcining proper~y. Mailing tc the addre~s shc~~ on the current re21
e~~~~e tax assessme~~ books of Albe~c~le CG~n~J~ 2hall be dee~ed 2deoua~e
cc~pliance wi~h this requirement. No Com~rEhensive ?l~n amendment sha:l
be approved within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the mailing of
such notice. The notice shall state the type of use proposed, specific
location of develop~ent, county office where the site development plan may
be viewed, and date of the public meeting. The applicant shall reimburse
the Ccun~y the cost of pos~age incurred for notification of adjacen0 pro-
p e r.t J1" 01:!ners.
4. Within ninety days after the applicatio~ deadline, the Board of
SuperVisors shall take action to approve or deny applications initiated by
citizens. Prior to the Board of Supervisors' review of Comprehensive Plan
a: ~dme~t applications, the Planning CO~wission shsll review all amendment
rC~uesGs and make recoIT@endations to the Board. Tte Site Plan Reivew OOI-
Eittee shall be consulted for recoL~endations as ~ecessary.
CcmIfrehehsive Plan Amendment Policy
Page Two
5. No Comprehensive Plan amendment application from a citizen
will be processed within six months prior to the expected date of adop-
tion of a major five-year Comprehensive Plan revision.
6. Prior to the deadline for Comprehensive Plan amendment requests,
the Board of Supervisors, or its agent (the Planning Commission) should
hold a public hearing for the purpose of discussion and to entertain pub-
lic CO~Eent on the Plan, in general. This public hearing would provide
a public forum for Planning COIT@ission/Board of Supervisors' requests to
amend the Plan. The date, time and purpose of the public hearing should
be advertised in a newspaper in advance.
CRITERIA FOR THE REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS
A. The Comprehensive Plan provides a long-range guide for direction
and context of the decision-making process fer public and private land
uses. The Comprehensive Plan is general in nature rather than attempting
to identify specific geographic locations. The Land Use Map of the Com-
prehensive Plan suggests the relationship of reco~~ended uses to general
areas. Proposed amendments to the Larld Use Map sho~ld be reviewed for
compliance with the general plan rather than area-specific or parcel-
specific requests for a change in the recorr~ended use. The purpose of the
Land Use Map is to provide and plan for a balance of land uses, equipped
w~ h adequate utilities and facilities, in a comprehensive, harmonious
ffi,-. _ner. Any proposed change in the Land Use Map will be evaluated for pro-
tection of the health, safety, and welfare of the general public rather
than the proprietary interests of an individual.
B. The merit of Comprehensive Plan amendment requests shall be
largely determiDed by the fulfillment cf s~~~c~: ts the "Goals and ObJec-
tives" specified irl Chapter 9 and the "Plan Standards" outliried in Chap-cer
10 of the Comprehensive Pla~.
c. A primary purpcse of the COffiprehe~sive Pla~ and Land Use Map
is to facilitate ~he cocrdination of imprcveme~:s to the transportation
~etwcrk and the exp2DsioD of public utili~ies in 2n economic21, efficient
and jUQlcious maDDer. Comprehensive Plan ameudments which direct growth
away from designated growth areas shall be discouraged unless adequate
just~fication is provided. Amendments to the boundaries of growth areas
waY be considered approp~iate if the request is comprehensive, proposes
to follow a logical topograp~ic or man-made feature and is supported by
adequate justification. No Comprehensive Fla~ amendment shall be con-
sidered in areas where roads ~re non-tolerable or utilities are inade-
qua:e unless the imprcveme~t of those facilities is included in the
Ccmprehensive Plan amennmen: prcpcsa~.
D. Proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be evaluated for
ge~eral compliance with adopted County plans, policies, studies and
o} nances and 00 determine if corresponding changes are necessary.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Policy
Page Three
E. Except as otherwise provided, the following conditions may be
considered in the evaluation of a request to amend the Comprehensive
Plan.
1. Change in circumstance had occurred; O~
2. Updated information is available; cr
j. Subsequent portions of the Comp~ehensive Plan have been adc'r~ed
4 .
or developed; or
A portion of the Plan is incorrect or not feasible; or
The preparation of the Plan as required by Article 15.1-~47
of the Code of Virginia was incomplete or incorrect infor-
mation was employed.
h
..) .
* * * * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, de hereby certify that the foregoing writ~ng
is a true, correct copy of a policy adopted by the Board of Supervisors
0: Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meetlng held on April 17,
i c;J r::
... ./ '
~d;{{i~
o R DIN A NeE
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance in
Section 4.15.4.1, Sign Permits
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance be amended and reenacted in Section
4.15.4.1 entitled "Sign Permits" to read as follows:
4.15.4.1 SIGN PERMITS
No person shall erect or cause to be erected any sign, except auction
and temporary event signs, in excess of five (5) square feet in area
unless and until a permit therefor shall have been obtained from the
zoning administrator. Stieh- -pet"'fftit- .shaH -he -i8stted -tipml" -t.'i~ ~yment- i)f
a -fee -ift -t-he- -am.Otiftt- m -t:wenty- .doH~~ -f$2e:-ge)- -to- -co"ifer -Hte ~t-
:i:fteideftt- -t-c- -the- 1.l!lIl!lItitlftCe'" <<- ~tl'Ch- ~rmit-"'8:ftd -tipml" ~ '{4ftmft~ 4ly-1:he
~Ofttftg- tldmini~tI'at:or -Hmt- -t-he- -p:r'Ol" Ol!ll ed.- ~tgn.- eemftlnft8" -t-c- -the--req\t:tre-
ment-s- <<- t:h.~ ""6rtiilmftee-:
AND FURTHER RESOLVED that this ordinance shall be effective on and after
, 1992.
.'
..
o R DIN A NeE
To amend and reenact
Section 35.0, Fees,
of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended and reenacted in
Section 35.0 entitled "Fees" as follows:
35.0 FEES
Except as herein otherwise provided, every application made to the
zoning administrator, the commission, or the board of supervisors
shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth hereinafter, to defray the
cost of processing such application.
a. For a special use permit:
1. Mobile home mtd-ltome-~Htm --$-25-.-00. $35.00.
2. Rural area divisions - $-165-.-00-.- $990.00.
3. Commercial use --$-165-.-00-. - $780.00.
4. Industrial use --$-165-.-00-.- - $810.00.
5. Private club/recreational facility - $165-.-00-.---$810.00.
6. Mobile home park or subdivision - -$-165-.~ $780.00.
7. Public utilities - $138,:,88,:,--$810.00.
8. Grade/fill in the flood plain - $690.00.
9. Minor amendment to valid special use permit - $85.00.
10. Extending special use permits - $55.00.
11. Home Occupation-Class A - $10.00;
Home Occupation-Class B - $350.00.
12. All other uses - $l-9G:-GG;- $780.00.
b. For amendment to text of zoning ordinance --$6&-.-00. $665.00.
c. h---Fm> Amendment to the zoning map---$i-&6-..{)O-1)itlS""-$i-{1tCr'e.
2,:, - - - Ft>t"- 5.tneftament- -to- i':fffl1ftg-1MI'-foI" -l'laftftea- de'Il'elt>pmeftts -
$628,:,88-~~8-$lfae~e,:,
1. For planned developments - under 50 acres - $815.00.
2. For planned developments - 50 or more acres - $1.255.00.
3. For all other zoning map amendments - under 50 acres -
$815.00.
4. For all other zoning map amendments - 50 or more acres -
$1,255.00.
5. Minor amendment to a Zoning Map Amendment - $175.00.
d . i -: - - - F-m- ~S'ts- -f-m-"ft- -vaft5.fl'Ce'" -to- tlte- boMd- -of-"2Oning -ap-l'eals--
$66,:,88,:, Board of Zoning Appeals:
1. Request for a variance - $95.00.
~
..
Ordinance amending Section 35.0 of the Zoning Ordinance
Page 2
2. For other appeals to the board of zoning appeals (including
appeals of zoning administrator's decision) - $2-S-~9:;--
$95 .00, to be refunded if the decision of the zoning admin-
istrator is overturned.
e. h-uFerr R.reliminary site development plan u$628-:88-:
1. Residential - $945.00, plus $10.00/unit.
2. Non-residential - $1,260.00, plus $10.00/1000 square feet.
2 -: - - - Fm- fm}- -site -devei6f'ment- -plt:l:fl- -( ~ist'f.t:l:ti'<.re)- -- -$2-&9 ~:;--
f. Final site development plan:
1. Approved administratively - $325.00.
2. If reviewed by the commission before approval of preliminary
site development plan - $900.00.
3":' - - - Fm- fm}- -site -devei6f'ment- -plt:l.ft'" -( -eom~ion-"1."e'If":tew)-:-
a, - - - Pmr -t:o-1,7reH,mint:l.'f)I"" -plt:l.ft'" "ftPi'r"Oval- - -$-1-20-.-00-.-
~- - - M-te:r- ~imifmry-r>htn -af'~- -- $Be&: e&:
3. If reviewed by the commission after approval of the prelimi-
nary site development plan - $630.00.
4. For site development plan waiver - -$i-u&.-o&. $215.00.
5. For site development plan amendment:
a) Minor - alterations to parking, circulation, building
Hize, location --$3-9:-99:-, - $75.00.
b) Major - commission review - -$-1-3&.-00-. $215.00.
6. Review of site development plan by the architectual review
board - $160.00.
7 . Appeal of site development plan to the board of supervisors
- $190.00.
8. Rehearing of site development plan by commission or board of
supervisors - $150.00.
"I
..
Ordinance amending Section 35.0 of the Zoning Ordinance
Page 3
9. Rejection by agent of incomplete site development plan:
a. Rejected within ten days - $160.00.
b. Suspended after Site Plan Review - Site plan fee shall
not be refunded. $50.00 fee shall be required to
reinstate project.
g. For relief from a condition of approval from commission or land-
scape waiver by agent --$66~99. $140.00.
h. Change in road or development name after submittal of site
development plan:
1. Road - $15.00.
2. Development - $20.00.
i. Extending approval of site development plan - $35.00.
]. Granting request to defer action on site development plan,
special use permit or zoning map amendment:
1. To a specific date - $25.00.
2 . Indefinitely - $60.00.
k. Bond inspection for site development plan, for each inspection
after the first bond estimate - $45.00.
1. Zoning clearance - $25.00.
m. Accessory lodging permits - $25.00.
n . Official Letters:
1. Of determination - $60.00.
2. Of compliance with county ordinances- $60.00.
3. Stating number of development rights - $30.00.
o. Sign Permits:
1. Any sign, except exempted signs and signs requiring review
by the architectual review board - $25.00.
2. Signs required to be reviewed by the architectual review
board - $60.00.
....... ... ',., Ii
Ordinance amending Section 35.0 of the Zoning Ordinance
Page 4
In addition to the foregoing, the actual costs of any notice required
under Chapter 11, Title 15.1 of the Code shall be charged to the
applicant, to the extent that the same shall exceed the applicable fee
set forth in this section. Failure to pay all applicable fees shall
constitute grounds for the denial of any application. For any appli-
cation withdrawn after public notice has been given, no part of the
fee will be refunded.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this ordinance shall be effec-
tive on and after , 1992.
* * * * *
,.
7
{~~4.(~(__..
9I,IZ/( If/a
"~'--" ..........,..,~'.~.,~...,~~-,..<.,,'
!
I,' ,. 1/.. :\
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
6 lS~i
: "u I
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
and c/oJv
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
Community Development
December 4, 1991
SP-90-31 Little Keswick School - Request for
Rv+-~n~;nn
Robert A. Wilson, on behalf of the Little Keswick School,
has requested extension of SP-90-31 for one year to allow
for the relocation of the East Rivanna Fire Station (See
Attachment A). The permit was originally approved on June
6, 1990 (See Attachment B) and expires December 6, 1991.
Staff agrees with the applicant's request and would
recommend a full eighteen month extension to June 6, 1992.
VWC/mem
ATTACHMENTS
,..
,
IAT1Al;HMENT Al
SCHOOL
SCII90L, INC.
President Headmaster
Robert A. Wilson, Sr. Marc J, Columbus
Vice-President Director
Elizabeth K. Wilson Anna B. Columbus
November 1, 1991
V. Wayne Cilimberg
County of Albemarle
Albemarle County Planning Co~~ission
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Re: SP-90-31 Robert A. &
Elizabeth K. Wilson
~".~~'..;.'.n.'~J.\f"""'- , ...."."
. ~ ';j}}~....- '-' ~lm
, ~
4 1991
PLANNING DIVISjON
'-- -."
I
Dear Mr. Cilimberg,
I respectfully request a one year extension of SP-90-31.
The East Rivanna Fire Company is getting closer to realizing
their move of the fire station to its new location, but their
plans are not yet finalized.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
~O~.l0~~
Robert A. Wilson
RAW/kw
P.O. Box 24 Keswick, Virginia 22947 Telephone 804-295-0457 Fax 804-977-1892
,-
IATTACHMENT B
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Albemarle County Planning Commission
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
June 18, 1990
Robert A. & Elizabeth K. Wilson
P.O. Box 24 _
Keswick, VA 22947
RE: SP-90-31 Robert A. & Elizabeth K. Wilson
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wilson:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on
June 6, 1990, approved the above-noted request to permit
expansion of the Little Keswick School [10.2.2(5)] by
utilizing the existing community building for East Rivanna
Fire Company. Property, consists of 1.0 acre zoned RA,
Rural Areas. Property located on the east side of Rt. 731
approximately 200' south of Rt. 22. Please note that this
approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Virginia Department of Transportation issuance of a
commercial entrance permit in the event of increased
enrollment or paving of Rt. 731;
2. Virginia Department of Health approval;
3. No increase in enrollment; and
4. Parcel to be combined with the existing parcel (Parcel
110) prior to the commencement of activity in the
existing Fire Company building.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Si77;;lY, ..
~ WaY~mbeF~
Direct~ ~~~~lan~ & Community Development
cc: Richard Moring
Jeff Echols
President
Robert A. Wilson, Sr.
Vice-President
Elizabeth K. Wilson
November 1,
Headmaster
Marc J. Columbus
Director
Anna B. Columbus
COUI\fTYOFA, pq"'l'~I.
[';:::,", r;::'-:J .......:" J'-_.."~_\ .... . I." t . I", L [-
'II' \ '[l..I, roo' (1\\ :,,,,,".-.., ,.-..
ii ; i .'~..,..."L .......!..-..".:. "-!;,LC:"' ! rl']
1:.:1 \ I' .:
I r; \'\ NOV 11 1901 1; I
1 : Ii., \J 1 i 1
I: 1\ 1''>'' j, j
tl Ll 1 L~~.'~.~;.~T':';'.":"l"--:'.-r"-'-'r'i"/ ; ?
. ~._l '-._ ,..:::; U U """,;
t:'..' q'-j ('" ... '"'i "". .....~
1991' <. ..It" ~ldljf>':"J!(',;.;
,~ ,~.t' j
V. waynt Cilimberg
County of Albemarle
Albemarle County Planning Commission
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Re: SP-90-31 lobert A. & .,
Elizabeth K. Wilson
PLANNING DIVISfON
"""""- ~."
Dear Mr. Cilimberg,
I respectfully request a one year extension of SP-90-31.
The East Rivanna Fire Company is getting closer to realizing
their move of the fire station to its new location, but their
plans are not yet finalized.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
~~.\D~~
Robert A. Wilson
RAW/kw
'^~ ~ Co I 19'70
0fc~~ ~ Co I (<=:9'(
P.O. Box 24 Keswick, Virginia 22947 Telephone 804-295-0457 Fax 804-977-1892
-r?.' :..' ......
. . ",' .....; :,...........,. ','.'
.:, ~.~, ..
:;:;+{.::/..i;.;l:i:;.;',',' < '"
~i[lti~i; ,
I."."..~~,..
(,.~.~.::N';'"
r.::(:'(.f\vx~; . .
I.... "'::2~':'\' ." .
1;~!?'.
l'
~
'.
:'l~.
:.'.1"...... . .
t'".: ',.
~/\l)'
. "'.'
<.>/'''7J'?JO(1 V
:... ':.'
~
. s
-;; h i'/7 ,ox) "L g c;: -
~Q.-. -.... "
lJ 7-" . ~
. .1 (1) . . ..~ rn +;f>.~ '/ <%~:~"" \ ~ .
':5 I\! C\} -...} ~ / A':::::::::':::::::":::'::\ \ 1."'-1 J)
~ .~.O'? ~ \:
__ QQ' ,L7.' f'\.<;;rz ,c;Q o~ 9 I "-
____o__'cx:!.~ (1"Jtr.lc;? oN'(Y
r
\L
~R
~
~~
,~ ~~]
~ ~ ~O
-38Sfl
~t\.r:
-l-.:
v~~
~~~
I:)~~
...:
,-.
(
~.ll 3CfCf f)::::J
uJ II . b~
as~ >~\i1~~
~, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ill ~
i,~ ~~~~ ~1_~~S
\\l~ '<l. a~ s"'~
~ (Y ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 ~
~~. ~ ~ :g ~ ~ ~ ~
Q.~ ~~~Q ~UJ~0
~3 ,(':1:~'3 1J~lJJ~
. ~ ~ "1'5 S I{l . ~ o. i] .?::
~~ ~i;53"3. -<(~:Q~
I\l t<\ --i'
"J
'V
~
~~ '6 j~
~gf)~~ft
-.J "&J. ~ t--
I ~~~~~n
<<: ~3~~~~~
'~ ~hh 3Q
~ \(~~ OJ
1"1 ~~~~~~S
~ ') ~ \1.J\l
-~ kj ~~
a~ ::>~~h
~~~~~~~
..,
~
s
~
If)
:~
~
LQ
:.l.
\l
lil
~
~
\1~
,
III Q UJ
~~~ ~
,I.) ~ ~ q
~ \1.) '>J.
uJ N. "::J \-v
';l: 0
):::.y')'h-
-- t\l
~\.-~~
~ ~ \_ll
~ IlJ ~ Q .
WYlI' .
b q;' \~ ."C
" \JJ "J ....<l: l-
X ',>
& ~~ J 0
<t."<..<jCi:...J
l()
'^
~
s
~
~
~~ ~
.~ .~
'j
-:3
~
v
""
~
,
Z3
CI-
~
:J
~
9
Vl
-1'6
~ ~~
(t ~
.g
~ ....{)
?J ~ ~\2:
~ ~ ~~
~ ~~
C'.!. 0
~ \ijh
::; ~~
\J
~
1
a
'~J
~ . \-:
@ ~ ~ J
\~?r",:5 ~
;;)~J~llJQ
.-:< 0 ~ '-L 1
1\ '\. ~ 0"::1
~~ ~~ ~
~~~~ ~
H ~;~ 1
(.) ~. ~ ~ ~
c. ~ ~ \) J- ()
~ ~ IU ):.
uJ '5 ~ '() ~ '2j
j::~<<5~8 ~
oJ r.:.
~
cI
~
~
G
~
~
$
<:l
\.J
"":r
~
~
o
':)
~ ~
'J '-
K s.
\IS'
B
".1
N.-J
~~
-:)
" ::z
~ .J
'CQ.
. " . ,',,"
...... ".... ..',...
,.-..
. '<<"
. ---,- ~ ~
t\l~<:\:;.
:r'-() -.j
~:JS
~-;(v<\.
~~) .~
8h
.'0
~ J'Sg
I,W,'Cro{f' q
.........:.: ---
--
\lJ
r:i.
-.:.
.':fl}
\-
.";2 <{
U' ·
~. _ O' w..
~~~~
- ~
~~~; :2
JC>loJ iJ
~~~~
<1;. \-
tUs~<>l ~~
~ ~ ~.~ ~
1() ~
8
- ~
': ~
~1
~ ~
...;.
9
- ~
~~
{~
""J~
o .
?iJ.
"32
~~
~~
~G
I1J
~~
Q~
~j
.. Q..
~..
-J
i=
\i.l
:::J
"J
~<
-:;;:
"--.._-
. '
. .
ell
r- : . . '. ::
\(l ....
:a
'.' ,:
C1.'~
~~
L~?
;J.J.[lO<J
g<;; L
;)1. ~
'$
""0- - ~
Q [~
~ <(~~
\ ~ ~ ~
-J - ~ ~
~, ~
~ \"'S \J
~ ~ ~~' ~
'"35: {J~ ~
~~ OS,~,
11 )2' ~ \,' g "" .
v \J '<(:J -~
!~~~~]
cr: tL =z <c {} ~
~
,"',' :.
..
",'. ','- - - >'-..
.'
DATE
/ )e c / (
C}1/1()/0JrV/
La nd ;; I f L.e CJ i5/ Ct I, 4.-
f J.e C / ~
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Waste
Management Regulations UR 672-20-10 requires all sanitary landfill
cells opened under existing permits after December 18, 1988 to be
closed under the new regulations; and
WHEREAS, while the Department of Waste Management's concern
relates to lechate generated in these cells entering and contami-
nating the environment, and groundwater in particular; and
WHEREAS, requiring the placement of a cap atop these closed
cells is a costly procedure with no proven benefit; and
WHEREAS, owners of landfills are still responsible for ground-
water quality irrespective of a requirement to cap cells under the
new regulations; and
WHEREAS, the requirement to monitor groundwater quality and
take mitigating action when deemed necessary is an appropriate
action; and
WHEREAS, these actions should meet the intent of groundwater
quality and environmental protection without incurring a costly
closure procedure; and
WHEREAS, the current waste management regulations do not allow
for alternative monitoring and subsequent mitigation in lieu of a
costly closure process;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Albemarle strongly requests its legislators to urge
the General Assembly to create a separate legislative commission to
review the efficacy of the State's current solid waste regulations.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
wri ting is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular
meeting held on December 11, 1991.
c~~ 1:e::~rs
DEFERRED UNTIL
J:1c I /
q, ,03 zo, 61
~f1CXJd IIiUUj ?jMvs f?e.pt'Yf-
be(l /9
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
Form. 3
7/25/86