HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-02-05
or
F
I
N
A L
9:00 A.M.
Feb~ 5, 1992
Room 7, County Office Building
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) *Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) Approval of Minutes: April 17, June 5, July 10, and August 14, 1991.
7) Highway Matters:
a) Letter dated January 13, 1992, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, Depart-
ment of Transportation, addressed to David P. Bowerman, Chairman, re:
the Route 29 Bypass and its relationship to the proposed Agnor-Hunt
Elementary School (Deferred from January 22, 1992).
b) Discussion: Request from Citizen to have traffic light installed at entrance
to The Colonnades and have speed limit reduced.
c) Letter dated January 23, 1992, from John G. Milliken, Secretary of Trans-
portation, concerning Route 671 (Millington Bridge) project.
d) Other Highway Matters.
8) Sal'a-Wa~on-Pl'eHmitull'y-Pl:ft.t:-Af)f)ear. (Applicant requests deferral.)
9) Acceptance of Deed from Emerald Land Company to Albemarle County for Land
Adjacent to Mint Springs Park (deferred from October 9, 1991.)
10) Retirement (Continuous Service) Policy.
11) 10:00 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING: An ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 8,
Finance and Taxation of the Albemarle County Code, by moving certain
sections within Article I, In General, to other sections of this chapter; to
add a new chapter Article XIV, Real Estate, In General, for simplification
and consistency within the chapters; to create a new chapter Article XV,
Personal Property, In General, to provide qualified volunteer rescue squad
and fire company workers a tax exemption of the first $4500 of assessed
value on one motor vehicle, subject to certain requirements; to amend and
reenact Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, Section 12-23, to allow any
person listed on the active rolls of any volunteer fire company or rescue
squad who qualifies under Article XV to be exempt from license fee pro-
visions as to anyone vehicle registered to such person.
12) United Way Scholarship Fund - Discussion of.
13) Police Proficiency Skill Policy.
14) Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance Amendment.
15) Memorandum of Understanding for JABA use of The Meadows Community Center.
16) Solid Waste Report.
17) Appropriations I Reappropriations:
a) Reappropriation - Crozet Crossing CDBG Grant.
b) CIP Appropriation - Keene Landfill.
c) CIP Appropriation - Adjustment of Revenues based on finalizing VPSA Bond
Issue and Sale of Fourth Street Property.
18) Revenue Projections Update.
19) Executive Session: Personnel.
20) 3:00 P.M., Joint Meetin~ - School Board, Room 5/6:
a) Overview of FY 92-93 School Budget.
b) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
21) Appointments.
22) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
23) Adjourn.
...-
CON S E N T
AGE N D A
FOR APPROVAL:
5.1 Resolution requesting acceptance of roads in Rosemont Subdivision into the State
System of Secondary Highways.
5.2 Resolution requesting acceptance of road in Windrift II into the State System of
Secondary Highways.
5.3 Resolution requesting acceptance of Walnut Creek Park Road in Walnut Creek
Park into the State System of Secondary Highways.
5.4 Memorandum dated January 29, 1992, from V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of
Planning & Community Development, entitled "SP-90-31, Robert A. & Elizabeth K.
Wilson (Little Keswick School), Request for Relief from Condition No.4."
FOR INFORMATION:
5.5 Letter dated January 16, 1992, addressed to David P. Bowerman, Chairman, from
E. C. Cochran, Jr., State Location and Design Engineer, Department of
Transportation, noting that the major design features of (Route 29 Project
6029-002-119, C501,C502, from Route 743 to south end of bridge over South Fork
Rivanna River) have been approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board
in accordance with presentation at the October 30, 1986, public hearing, with
modification to provide for six lanes plus continuous right turn lanes with
signalized at-grade intersections.
5.6 Copy of minutes of the Planning Commission for January 14, 1992.
5.7 Letter dated January 22, 1992, from the Zoning Administrator, to Joseph W.
Richmond, Jr., entitled "Official Determination of Number of Parcels - Section
10. 3 . 1, Tax Map 65, Parcel 15; property of Thurber M. Foreman, III."
5.8 Letter dated January 27, 1992, from the Zoning Administrator, to Ruby C.
Garnett, entitled "Official Determination of Number of Parcels - Section 10.3.1,
Tax Map 57, Parcel 68A."
5.9 Letter dated January 15, 1992, from H. Bryan Mitchell, Deputy Director,
Department of Historic Resources, noting interest from the owner of Merrie Mill,
Albemarle County, 02-49 in having property listed on the National Register of
Historic Places and the Virginia Landmarks Register.
5.10 Copy of letter dated January 22, 1992, from Leonard W. Sandridge, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, University of Virginia, addressed to
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, in which Mr. Sandridge notes that
Harry Porter, Dean of the School of Architecture, has assumed the responsibility
as the Architect for the University effective January 1, 1992.
5.11 Memorandum dated January 27, 1992, from Amelia M. Patterson, Zoning Adminis-
trator, addressed to Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, entitled "Official
Determination of No Special Use Permit Needed - Keswick Golf Maintenance
Facility. "
5.12 Memorandum dated January 28, 1992, from Patrick K. Mullaney, Director, Parks
& Recreation, entitled "Cityl County Fees" regarding nonresident fees for use of
the City's Pen Park.
5 .13 Noise Ordinance, Staff Update.
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
and Community Development .
FROM, Lettie E. Neher. Clerk. CMC ~J
DATE: February 6, 1992
SUBJECT: Board Actions of February 5, 1992
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting held on February 5, 1992, the follow-
ing actions were taken:
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Resolution requesting acceptance of roads in Rosemont
Subdivision into the State System of Secondary Highways. ADOPTED. Original
resolution sent to Engineering.
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Resolution requesting acceptance of road in Windrift
II into the State System of Secondary Highways. ADOPTED. Original resolution
sent to Engineering.
Agenda Item No. 5.3. Resolution requesting acceptance of Walnut Creek Park
Road in Walnut Creek Park into the State System of Secondary Highways. ADOPTED.
Original resolution sent to Engineering.
Agenda Item No. 5.4. Memorandum dated January 29, 1992, from V. Wayne
Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community Development, entitled "SP-90-31,
Robert A. & Elizabeth K. Wilson (Little Keswick School), Request for Relief from
Condition No.4." APPROVED, request for relief from condition No.4 with sub-
stitute condition as stated below:
4. Use is for the expansion of the Little Keswick School.
Date:
Page 2
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
February 6, 1992
Memo To:
Agenda Item No. 5.5. Letter dated January 16, 1992, addressed to David P.
Bowerman, Chairman, from E. C. Cochran, Jr., State Location and Design Engineer,
Department of Transportation, noting that the major design features of (Route 29
Project 6029-002-119, C501,C502, from Route 743 to south end of bridge over
South Fork Rivanna River) have been approved by the Commonwealth Transportation
Board in accordance with presentation at the October 30, 1986, public hearing,
with modification to provide for six lanes plus continuous right turn lanes with
signalized at-grade intersections.
Requested the County Executive to draft a letter for the Chairman's signa-
ture to go to Messrs. Cochran, Milliken and Pethtel to restate the Board's
previous comments about rights-of-way acquisition for the grade separated
interchanges and to remind Virginia Department of Transportation about the three
party agreement between the County, City and University.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Highway Matters: Discussion: Request from Citizen to
have traffic light installed at entrance to The Colonnades and have speed limit
reduced. Request deferred to March 4, 1992, to receive study results from Mr.
Roosevelt.
Agenda Item No. 7c. Letter dated January 23, 1992, from John G. Milliken,
Secretary of Transportation, concerning Route 671 (Millington Bridge) project.
REAFFIRMED the Board's resolution of April 10, 1991, and requested that a letter
be forwarded to Secretary Milliken stating the Board's intent not to make a
request to the Virginia Outdoors Foundation and to request the Virginia Depart-
ment of Transportation to look into the new Federal legislation concerning
bridges and see if it applies to this project and to determine if a waiver is in
order, and if so the Virginia Department of Transportation is to request such a
waiver.
Agenda Item No.8. Sara Watson Preliminary Plat Appeal. DEFERRED, at the
applicant's request, until May 6, 1992.
Agenda Item No.9. Acceptance of Deed from Emerald Land Company to
Albemarle County for Land Adjacent to Mint Springs Park (deferred from October
9, 1991.) AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the deed accepting 58.788 acres for
the County of Albemarle. Deed forwarded to Tremblay & Smith law firm for Mr.
Langman's signature at Mr. St. John's request. AUTHORIZED appropriation of
$592.63 to be paid to the Emerald Land Company for payment of their 1991 real
estate taxes for the property with instructions that the money be used to satis-
fy the tax liability before the deed is executed. Appropriation form requested
from Melvin Breeden. Also authorized lifetime membership to the Mint Springs
Park to specific family members as follows:
The Langman Family:
Linda Langman
Ronald Langman
The Roell Family:
Katurah Roell
Elizabeth Roell
Memo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
February 6, 1992
Date:
Page 3
Willem Langman
Ina Langman
Juliet Langman
Isaiah Roell
Joshua Roell
Agenda Item No. 10. Retirement (Continuous Service) Policy. DEFERRED to
April 1, 1992, to allow the Joint Personnel Policy Committee to review and make
a recommendation on fiscal and operational impacts to the Board.
Agenda Item No. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: An ordinance to amend and reenact
Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation of the Albemarle County Code, by moving certain
sections within Article I, In General, to other sections of this chapter; to add
a new chapter Article XIV, Real Estate, In General, for simplification and
consistency within the chapters; to create a new chapter Article XV, Personal
Property, In General, to provide qualified volunteer rescue squad and fire
company workers a tax exemption of the first $4500 of assessed value on one
motor vehicle, subject to certain requirements; to amend and reenact Chapter 12,
Motor Vehicles and Traffic, Section 12-23, to allow any person listed on the
active rolls of any volunteer fire company or rescue squad who qualifies under
Article XV to be exempt from license fee provisions as to anyone vehicle regis-
tered to such person. ADOPTED the attached ordinance.
Agenda Item No. 12. United Way Scholarship Fund - Discussion of. AP-
PROVED, the transfer of $10,000 in unused funds from the United Way Child Care
Scholarship teen mother program to the fee-based child care program administered
by the Department of Social Services for the current fiscal year. In addition
the Board will consider during budget review, funding the Teensight program to
assist teen mothers at all of the schools in FY 92/93 based on staff's review of
Teensight's proposal. Appropriation form requested from Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 13. Police Proficiency Skill Policy. ADOPTED the attached
Police Officer Skill Proficiency Plan to be funded from existing resources in
the current fiscal year.
Agenda Item No. 14. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance Amendment.
Set PUBLIC BEARING for March 18, 1992. Request comments from the Planning
Commission prior to the public hearing. Also, when a natural erosion occurs in
an Erosion Impact Area what substantive regulations apply.
Agenda Item No. 15. Memorandum of Understanding for JABA use of The Mead-
ows Community Center. AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the attached Memorandum
of Understanding for Albemarle County. Agreement forwarded to JABA for signa-
ture.
Memo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
February 6, 1992
Date:
Page 4
Agenda Item No. 16. Solid Waste Report. ACCEPTED the report. Staff is
asked to bring the evaluation of the Materials Recovery System report as soon as
completed. The Board asked for information on how many times items can be
recycled before they can no longer be used. Staff to provide information to
the Board in March on the Keene Transfer Station and any impact from this report
to that.
Agenda Item No. 17a. Reappropriation - Crozet Crossing CDBG Grant. AP-
PROVED. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 17b. CIP Appropriation - Keene Landfill. APPROVED.
Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden. The Board asked to be notified
before anything significant is spent.
Agenda Item No. 17c. CIP Appropriation - Adjustment of Revenues based on
finalizing VPSA Bond Issue and Sale of Fourth Street Property. APPROVED.
Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden. The Board wants to know when this
additional amount was approved.
Agenda Item No. 18. Revenue Projections Update. Consensus of the Board to
leave $465,750 in the contingency fund to be used at Board's discretion during
work sessions.
Agenda Item No. 20a. Overview of FY 92-93 School Budget. RECEIVED, no
action taken.
Agenda Item No. 21. Appointments.
REAPPOINTED Mr. Edward H. Deets, Jr. to the Equalization Board, represent-
ing the Jack Jouett district, term to expire December 31, 1992.
REAPPOINTED Mr. Bruce D. Rasmussen to the Industrial Development Authority,
representing the Samuel Miller district, term to expire January 19, 1996.
APPOINTED Mr. Harry W. Porter, Jr. to the Albemarle County Planning
Commission as the University of Virginia non-voting member, term to expire
December 31, 1992.
LEN:bh
Attachments
cc: Robert B. Brandenburger
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Amelia Patterson
Bruce Woodzell
George R. St. John
File
..
{~
r r,
jL'
R I'
~ t ~
't' t.,4
", ;.:
<:"'..-...."',,.
r'Tl r7
; \ \f f
) .. :' ~If
,.../ \ "
j L1
THIS DEED, made as of this ____ day of January, 1992, by
and among EMERALD LAND COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, the
"Grantor", and COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, the "Grantee."
(NOTE: This Deed is exempt from taxation pursuant to Section
58.1-811(A) (3) and (C) (3) of the Code of Virqinia.)
WIT N E SSE T H :
That for and in consideration of the sum of FIVE HUNDRED
NINETY SIX DOLLARS AND 23/100 ($596.23), cash in hand paid,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Emerald Land
Company does hereby GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY with
I f-
w
I- w e(
It >
~ f-
Ul (/) W
J: ...J
...J
~ Cl >
>- J: (/)
f- w
<( f-
-l (/) f-
e( 0
In w ...J
~ m It
W 0 e(
J:
0:: III U
I- 9
GENERAL WARRANTY .AND ENGLISH COVENANTS OF TITLE unto the
County of Albemarle, Virginia, the following described real
estate:
All that certain parcel of land located in the
White Hall Magisterial District of Albemarle
County, Virginia, more particularly shown and
described as "58.7881 Acres to Be Donated to County
of Albemarle, Virginia" on the plat which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Being a portion of the property conveyed to
Emerald Land Company by Deed of Assumption of
Catherine J. Womack, Trustee of the Emerald Land
Trust under a Trust Agreement dated November 4,
1985, said Deed being dated June 16, 1989, and
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
for the County of Albemarle at Deed Book 1054, page
453.
This conveyance is made subject to all easements,
restrictions, reservations and other matters contained in duly
1
I f-
W
t- w ..(
0:: >
::!: f-
In W
Ul J: ..J
..J
~ (j :>
>- J: In
f- W
<( f-
...J In f-
0( 0
lD w ..J
::!: m 0::
0 0(
IJ.J J:
0:: III U
t- o
vi
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, at large:
CITY/COUNTY OF
to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of January, 1992, by Ronald H. J. Langman, President
of Emerald Land Company.
My commission expires:
Notary Public
COMMONWEALTH OF ~~~GINI~! at large:
eHUf-/COUNTY OF ELi)tJ!7o../ldl- , to-wit:
I~~ The forego~~~instrument was acknowledged ~efore me this
(f) day of J{ffif:J.~ 1992, by lja '/id.-- p, j31UVI./l/X.U~
Chairman of the County of Albemarle Board of Supervisors.
My commission expires: Mu.,y 029,1993
?-
30\emridge.dd
3
MEMO-OF-UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
MEADOWS COMMUNITY CENTER
ALBEMARLE PARKS AND RECREATION
401 MCINTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
AND
JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING
2300 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE B-1
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
The Jefferson Area Board for Aging (JABA) will use the Meadows
Community Center located in Crozet for its base for delivering
homebound meals, for serving congregate meals to senior citizens of
Albemarle County and providing outreach.
JABA will use the kitchen, main room, and a designated office.
A JABA Care Manager will be using the office full-time weekdays
along with a part-time site Coordinator. JABA will provide office
furniture, supplies, a phone and fax lines.
JABA will utilize three Green Thumb Workers to receive
supplies, deliver homebound meals and prepare congregate services.
These Green Thumb workers will be supervised by JABA Care Manager
housed in the Meadows Community Center. When the Senior Site
Coordinator is hired, Green Thumb Workers will be supervised by
this new position.
The Green Thumb Workers will receive and store food and
supplies delivered each Tuesday. Packing and delivery of meals
will occur each week. A congregate meal will be served on the
second Tuesday of each month. As participation grows, a congregate
meal will be served once weekly. When program is fully enrolled,
JABA will offer a congregate meal with senior acti vi ties twice
weekly. The days will be negotiated with the County at that time.
The kitchen will be used to heat frozen dinners and for preparation
of the balance of the meal.
The Green Thumb Workers will prepare the Main Room for use by
setting up tables and chairs. They will also restore the Main Room
to its original condition by putting chairs and tables back in
storage, as well as, cleaning the kitchen, lavatories and floors.
JABA will use County tables and chairs stored at the Meadows
Community Center.
County will provide toilet paper and hand soap for the
restrooms.
JABA will provide a small refrigerator and freezer to be used
only for the homebound and congregat~ meals.
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic,
Article V, County Vehicle Licenses, Section 12-23 is hereby amended
and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 12-23. Same--Volunteer Fire Company and Rescue Squad Members.
Any person listed on the active rolls of any volunteer fire
company or rescue squad who qualifies under section 8-70 of this
Code shall be exempt from the license fee provisions of this
article as to anyone vehicle registered to such person.
(11-15-73; Ord. of 2-14-90)
State law reference-Code of Va., Sec. 46.2-752.
FURTHER ORDAINED that in all other respects Chapter 12, Motor
Vehicles and Traffic, of the Code of Albemarle remains the same;
AND FURTHER ORDAINED that this ordinance is effective with the
1991 license year.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted
by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
regular meeting held on February 5~.~
~~rd 0 ounty Supervlsors
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 8, FINANCE AND TAXATION
OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation, of the Code
of Albemarle is hereby amended and reenacted in certain sections to
read as follows:
Article I. In General.
Sec. 8-1. Exemption of certain personal property from taxation.
Repealed Sec. 8-1 and moved the wording to be new Sec. 8-67.
Sec. 8-1.1. Biennial assessment of real estate.
Repealed Sec. 8-1.1 and moved the wording to be new Sec. 8-64.
Sec. 8-1.1. Erroneous Assessments.
(a) The director of finance of the county, after diligent
investigation and upon being satisfied that he has erroneously
assessed a taxpayer with any local levies shall, if the levies have
not been paid, exonerate the taxpayer from payment of so much thereof
as is erroneous, and if such levies have been paid, shall refund to
the taxpayer the amount erroneously paid together with any penalties
and interest paid thereon.
(b) When the director of finance who made the erroneous
assessment has been succeeded by another person, such person shall
have the same authority as the director making the original errone-
ous assessment; provided, that he makes diligent investigation to
determine that the original assessment was erroneously made and
certifies thereto to his local governing body.
(c) Any application by an aggrieved taxpayer for correction of
a tax assessment must be made within five years from the last day of
the tax year for which such assessment is made.
(d) Reports itemizing such refunds shall be made to the board
of supervisors on a quarterly basis. (11-3-76; 4-13-88; Sec.
8-1.2, Ord. of 2-14-90.)
Sec. 8-1.2. Penalty for returned checks.
(a) If any check tendered for any tax due under this chapter is
not paid by the bank on which it is drawn, the taxpayer for whom such
check was tendered shall remain liable for the payment of the tax the
same as if such check had not been tendered.
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 2.
(b) If such person fails to pay the amount shown on the face
of the check within five days after notice of such nonpayment has
been mailed by certified or registered mail to the taxpayer by the
director of finance, a penalty of twenty-five dollars ($25.00)
shall be added to the tax due. Such penalty shall be in addition
to any and all other penalties provided by law. (11-3-76; Sec.
8-1.3, 4-13-88.)
Sec. 8-1.3. Penalty; interest; date and manner of payment.
(a) Taxes due and owing to the county for real estate shall be
due and payable in one installment on or before the fifth day of
December of the year such taxes are assessed.
(b) Taxes due and owing to the county for tangible personal
property, machinery and tools, mobile homes and public service
corporations shall be due and payable in two (2) installments on or
before the fifth day of June and the fifth day of December of the
year such taxes are assessed.
(c) Supplemental tax assessments for real estate, tangible
personal property, machinery and tools, mobile homes and public
service corporations shall be due and payable within thirty (30)
days of the billing date.
(d) A penalty equal to ten (10) percent of the amount past
due shall apply on all taxes remaining unpaid after the due date.
(e) Interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum shall
apply on all taxes and penalties commencing the first day of the
month following the month in which such taxes are due and continuing
until paid.
(f) The provisions herein are in no way intended to alter any
other provisions of state law or county ordinance, the subject of
which is not specifically addressed herein. (8-10-77; 10-8-80;
Sec. 8-1.4, Ord. of 2-14-90)
Sec. 8-1.4. Use of credit card in payment of taxes.
The director of finance is authorized to accept payments of local
taxes by use of a credit card. In addition to any penalties and
interest, the director of finance shall add to such payment a sum not
to exceed four (4) percentum of the amount of the tax, penalty and
interest paid, as a service charge for the acceptance of such card.
Such service charge shall not exceed the percentage charged to the
county by the credit card company. (Sec. 8-1.5, 10-2-85)
Sec. 8-1.6. Assessment of new buildings substantially completed.
Repealed 8-1.6 and moved wording to be new Sec. 8-65.
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 3.
Sec. 8-1.7. Time limits for appeals of real estate assessments.
Repealed 8-1.7 and moved wording to be new Sec. 8-66.
Sec. 8-1.8. Tax Valuation, etc., date for tangible personal
property, machinery and tools.
Repealed 8-1.8 and moved the wording to be new Sec. 8-68.
Sec. 8-1.9. Proration of Tangible Personal Property.
Repealed 8-1.9 and moved the wording to be new Sec. 8-69.
* * * * *
Article XIII. Real Estate - In General.
Sec. 8-64. Biennial assessment of real estate.
(a) All real estate in the county shall be assessed biennially
for purposes of taxation by the director of finance of the county as
of January 1 of each odd year, and all taxes for each even year on
such real estate shall be extended on the basis of the last
assessment made prior to such year.
(b) The office of real estate assessments of the county has
conducted a new reassessment of all real property to be applicable on
real estate for the tax year beginning January 1, 1977, and shall
conduct a new reassessment of all real property biennially to be
applicable for the tax year beginning January 1 of every odd tax year
thereafter. The office of real estate assessment may complete such
reassessment during an entire two year period, employing the same
standards of value for all appraisals made during such period.
(c) Beginning with assessment effective on January 1, 1977,
all assessments of real estate in the count shall be made at one
hundred (100) percentum fair market value. (Sec. 8-1.1, 11-3-76.)
Sec. 8-65. Assessment of new buildings substantially completed.
Every new building substantially completed or fit for use,
occupancy and enjoyment prior to November 1 of the year of completion
shall be assessed when so completed or fit for use and occupancy, and
the director of finance shall enter in the books the fair market
value of such building. No partial assessment as provided herein
shall become effective until information as to the date and amount of
such assessment is recorded in the office of the director of finance
and made available for public inspection. The total tax on any such
new building for that year shall be the sum of (i) the tax upon the
assessment of the completed building, computed according to the
ratio which the portion of the year such building is substantially
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 4.
completed or fit for use and occupancy bears to the entire year,
and (ii) the tax upon the assessment of such building as it existed
on January 1 of that assessment year, computed according to the
ratio which the portion of the year such building was not
substantially complete or fit for use and occupancy bears to the
entire year. With respect to any assessment under this section
after September 1 of any year, the penalty for nonpayment by
December 5 shall be extended to February 5 of the succeeding year.
(Sec. 8-1.6, 9-9-87)
Sec. 8-66. Time limits for appeals of real estate assessments.
Pursuant to the provisions of section 58.1-3330 of the Code of
Virginia, all applications for appeal from any assessment of real
estate must be made by the property owner or lessee within ninety
(90) days from the notice date of the real estate assessment
change. In accordance with section 58.1-3378 of the Code of
Virginia, any additional appeal must be made to the board of
equalization within thirty days. Appeals on pro rata assessment
where new construction becomes substantially complete between
January 1 and October 31 are not affected by the March 31 or April
30 deadlines. (Sec. 8-1.7, 7-12-89)
Article XIV. Personal Property - In General
Sec. 8-67 Exemption of certain personal property from taxation.
The following household and personal effects are hereby exempted
from taxation:
(a) Bicycles.
(b) Household and kitchen furniture, including gold and silver
plates, plated ware, watches and clocks, sewing machines,
refrigerators, automatic refrigerating machinery of any type, vacuum
cleaners and all other household machinery, books, firearms and
weapons of all kinds.
(c) Pianos, organs, phonographs and record players and records
to be used therewith and all other musical instruments of whatever
kind and all radio and television instruments and equipment.
(d) Oil paintings, pictures, statuary, curios, articles of virtu
and works of art.
(e) Diamonds, cameos or other precious stones and all precious
metals used as ornaments or jewelry.
(f) Sporting and photographic equipment.
(g) Clothing and objects of apparel.
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 5.
(h) All other tangible personal property used by an
individual or a family or household incident to maintaining an
abode.
The classification set forth above shall apply only to such
property owned and used by an individual or by a family or household
incident to maintaining an abode. (Sec. 9-1, Code 1967; Sec. 8-1,
Code 1988)
Sec. 8-68. Tax valuation, etc., date for tangible personal property,
machinery and tools.
Tangible Personal Property, except as provided under section
8-84, shall be taxed as of January first of each year. The status
of all persons, firms, corporations and other taxpayers liable to
taxation on any such property shall be fixed as of such date in
each year and the value of such property shall be taken as of such
date.
The director of finance shall not make an assessment under the
provisions of this section if the assessment would result in the
issuance of a tax bill in an amount less than five dollars ($5.00).
(Sec. 8-1.8, Ord. of 2-14-90)
State law reference-Similar provisions, Code of Va., Secs.
58.1-3515, 58.1-3912.
Sec. 8-69. Proration of tangible personal property.
(a) The tangible personal property tax shall be levied upon
motor vehicles which acquire a situs within the County after
January first of any tax year for the remaining portion of the tax
year; such tax shall be prorated on a monthly basis.
(b) When any motor vehicle loses its situs in the County or
changes ownership after January first of the tax year any tax
assessed on such vehicle shall be relieved, or refunded if paid.
Such relief or refund shall be prorated on a monthly basis.
(c) Whenever a motor vehicle with a situs in the County is
transferred to a new owner within the County, the new owner shall be
subject to taxation on a prorated basis for the remaining portion of
the tax year. The previous owner shall be eligible for relief or
refund as provided by paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) For the purposes of this section a period of more than
one-half (1/2)of a month shall be counted as a full month and a
period of less than one-half (1/2) of a month shall not be counted.
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 6.
(e) The director of finance may apply any refunds under this
section to any delinquent accounts owed by the taxpayer. In
addition, this refund may be applied as a credit toward the tax due
on a newly acquired motor vehicle.
(f) Each taxpayer owning tangible personal property with a
situs within the County shall file a return on forms prescribed by
the director of finance on or before January 31 of each year or
within thirty (30) days of the date of purchase or the establish-
ment of a situs within the County.
(g) Tangible personal property, which was legally assessed by
another jurisdiction in the Commonwealth and on which the tax has
been paid, are exempt from taxation under this section for the
portion of the year such property was legally assessable by another
jurisdiction in the Commonwealth. (Sec. 8-1.9, Ord. of 2-14-90)
State law reference-Similar provisions, Code of Va., Sec.
58.1-3516.
Sec. 8-70. Volunteer rescue squad and fire company workers.
(a) Items of property owned by members of a volunteer
rescue squad or fire company which meet the criteria set forth in
this section shall constitute a class of property separate from
other classifications of tangible personal property.
(b) Qualified property is limited to one motor vehicle as
defined in Code of Virginia Section 46.2-100 owned and registered
or partially owned and registered with the Virginia Department of
Motor Vehicles by the qualifying volunteer rescue squad or fire
company member. Qualification may not be transferred from one
vehicle to another during a six month billing cycle as long as the
original vehicle reported remains in the volunteer's ownership.
(c) The motor vehicle must be regularly used by the qualify-
ing volunteer rescue squad or fire company member to respond to
calls.
(d) The qualifying volunteer must have completed minimum
training requirements and one hundred (100) hours of volunteer
activities during the preceding twelve (12) months. Eligible
volunteer hours are limited to hours attending squad/company
meetings, training sessions or actual responses to calls.
(e) Qualifying volunteers must meet the minimum requirements
and be an active member of the squad/company as of June 1 or
December 1 to be eligible for the next six (6) month billing cycle
beginning the following July 1 or January 1. The chief or captain
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 7.
of each squad/company shall provide by June 15 and December 15 a
certified list of all members who have met the eligibility crite-
ria. Volunteers will not be eligible for a refund on any tax paid
or assessed prior to meeting the eligibility criteria and being
included on the appropriate listing.
(f) The tax rate for the first four thousand five hundred
dollars ($4,500.00) of assessed value shall be set at $0.00 and the
balance of the assessed value shall be set at the general personal
property tax rate. (2-5-92)
Code of Va., Sec. 58.1-3506.
FURTHER ORDAINED that in all other respects Chapter 8, Finance
and Taxation, of the Code of Albemarle remains the same;
AND FURTHER ORDAINED that this ordinance is effective with the
1991 license year.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted
by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
regular meeting held on February ~92. ~ ~~A .
~ of fo;;'6t:1"~~ors
GOAL STATEMENT
The goal of the Albemarle County Police Department Skill
Proficiency Plan is to develop and retain "highly" qualified
Police Officers, to deliver effective services to the citizens oE
Albemarle County. The program is designed to:
*
Provide a system that will attract and retain highly
competent individuals to the police officer proEession.
*
Provide police officers with skills that are ~ore
consistant with the critical services the police
department provides to the community.
*
Fulfill one of the basic values of the Albemarle
County Police Department which is the belief that
"its greatest potential is achieved by supporting
the development of its employees and their
active participation in the development and
implementation of Departmental Policies."
*
Provide an alternative incentive for Police Officers
who do not desire supervisory positions, or for whom
supervisory vacancies are not available.
*
Provide a professional system of skill proficiency
designation for police officers.
,
BACKGROUND
The Albemarle County Police Department was created in July,
1983. The force consists of one rank of police officers, and a
series of supervisory positions, i.e. sergeants, lieutenants, and
captain, in addition to the Chief. Because the police department
is relatively small, the opportunity for officers to attain
promotion to supervisory positions was limited. Except for
mandatory training, officers had no incentive to increase their
skill level or to exceed minimal requirements for their
positions. As the present force increased in seniority the
potential problem of having to replace officers in the future
needed to be addr~ssed. In addition, the long range growth
projections for the County indicated that additional officers
would be needed in order to meet the demands for service in the
County.
In the fall of 1989, the Chief of Albemarle County Police
Department commissioned a Task Force, (see Appendix 1), to
address these issues through the development of a Skill
Proficiency Plan for police officers. The Task Force studied a
variety of models that existed in other localities and attempted
to meet the unique needs of a growing police force in Albemarle
County.
The Task Force drew from research that had been done on
programs in other professions. In doing so, the following
assumptions guided their work:
1) In order to be successful, the Skill Proficiency Plan
must be optional with no stigma for those police
officers who choose not to be part of the plan.
2) The basic salary schedule for Police Officers must
remain competitive. The Skill Proficiency Plan must not
be used to supplant an attractive salary for those
officers who are not participating in the plan.
3) The plan ~ust not contain quotas. Any officer who
chooses to participate should have the opportunity if
the criteria are met.
4) The Skill Proficiency Plan should provide officers with
additional leadership, training and educational
responsibilities and incentives for excelling in
performance and training.
It is anticipated that the Albemarle COllnty Police Officers
Skill Proficiency Plan as proposed by the Task Force will provide
a better motivated and more highly skilled corps of officers who
stand ready to meet the needs of our community.
,
SKILL PATH OPTIONS
Resea~ch supports the fact that people, in order to
experience fulfillment in their ca~eers, should be given the
opportunity to take expanding roles in decision making and
leadership. A number of professional responsibilities, over anrl
above the basic Police Officer job description, are present which
are necessary for the police force to meet its demands to fellow
off ice r s, the Co u n t y g 0 ve r n me nt, and the pub lie. 0 f fie e r s
participating in the Skill Proficiency will constitute a pool of
professional expertise from which the Chief of Police may draw in
fulfilling these responsibilities. Examples of the
responsibilities include:
1) Serve as a mentor to new officers
2) Provide interdivision training
3) Fill in for supervisors on a temporary basis
4) Serve on departmental/County committees and task forces
5) Fulfill specialty assignments such as field training
officer, canine, evidence technician, etc.
The four skill levels for police officers are:
1) Police Officer I
2) Police Officer II
3) Senior Police Officer
4) Master Police Officer
For each level, criteria have been established in the
following areas:
1) Experience
2) Performance Evaluation
3) Preventable Accidents
4) Firearms Expertise
5) Mastery of Skill Areas, and
6) Physical Fitness
7) Education
The specific requirements are depicted in Figure (l)
"
POLICE
OFFICeR I
FIGURE 1
PROGRAM CRITERIA
POLIC f~
OFFICt:R II
SE~J lOR
POLICr; OFFICER
MASTER
POLICE OFFICER
CRITERIA
( 1 )
Experience
LEVEL 1
3 yea rs as a
police off.
(2 yrs. after
probation)
LEVEL II
G years as a
police off.
LeVEL III
10 yea cs as a
police off.
LEVEL IV
15 years as a
pol ice off.
Performance
Evaluation
85% average
on last 2
yea rs of
evaluations
85% average
on Level I
evaluations
85% average
on Leve 1 I I
evalu2tions
85% average
on Level III
evaluations
Accidents
(preventable)
not more than
5 in 15 years
not more than
1 in 3 yrs.
not more than
2 in 6 years
not more than
3 in 10 years
Fi rea rms
85
85
85
85
( 3 )
Hastery of
Skill Areas
40 hours
train. course
in specialty
area. As
approved by
Department.
Active parti-
cipation as a
Department
liaison
officer with a
Neighborhood
Hatch Program.
40 hours
advance train.
in specialty
as approved by
Department.
45 hour first
responder
course
(certificate)
40 hou:-s
general
Instructors
certificate.
60 additional
hrs. of train.
selected from
Level III
approved
courses.
Teach Level I
II Courses
40 hours of
training
selected from
Level IV
approved
courses:
fill in as
1st line
supervisor
as needed.
Teach and
evaluate all
level courses
Physical (2)
Fitness
Standards
Pass annual
physical
fitness
exam
Must meet
Department's
physical Hell-
ness Program.
(1) Experience as a Police Officer may he credited for police work In
the military police, sheriff's department, etc. The Chief of
Police has ~he final authotity in granting of credit for
previous experience.
(2) See physical wellness pro~ram manual for requirements.
....
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN
Since each skill proficiency contains a requirement for
mastery of certain skill areas, each police officer who intends
to apply for advancement must establish a plan for meeting these
requir.-ements.
It is not sufficient to mer.-cly attend training. More
important officers must demonstrate that they have tr.-ansferred
training into practice, i.e. that they have mastered the
par.-ticular area. Immediate supervisors will appr.-ove of the skill
proficiency plan for each officer. In developing the plan, the
supervisor and officer shall agree on the skill areas to be
covered, and the number of hours to be complet~d in each area.
In addition, the supervisor will judge whether or not the skill
area has been mastered based on the department's standards for
that skill area. Divisional commanders shall review and approve
all skill proficiency plans within their divisions. They will
also approve verification of mastery in each skill area.
TRANSITIONING OF NEH EXPERIEtKED OFFICERS
It is recognized that attracting experienced officers to the
Albemarle County Police Force is desirable. Therefore, after two
years of successful experience in Albemarle County as a Police
Officer, individuals may be advanced to a skill proficiency level
commensurate with their total experience, provided they meet all
other criteria for that level.
PROCEDURES FOR ADVANCEHEtJT
Officers who seek advancement 011 the Albemarle County Skill
Proficiency Plan shall be responsible for the f,~llowing:
1) Completion of an application by Novembor 1 of the year
preceding the year in which the advancement would take
effect.
2) Completion of the professional growth ~lan as set forth
by the immediate supervisor.
3) Submission of a file which contains evidence of meeting
the criteria for the advancement level, to include:
a. accident records
b. firearms records
c. physical fitness records
d. attendance records
e. performance evaluations
...
This portfolio will be submitted by December 1 to the
Chairman of the Professional Review Board. Successful candidates
will advance to the appropriate career-step effective July 1, and
will be provided with an insignia which designates their skill
level position.
PROFESSIONAL REVIEW BOARD
The Professional Review Board will consist of three officers
as follows:
a. Police Lieutenant
b. Police officer from patrol
c. Police officer from investigations
d. Human Resources Personnel
The two police officers will be chosen on an annual basis to
serve for a one year term (July 1 - June 30). Officers who wish
to serve on the Board will complete a self-nomination form by May
1 and submit it to the Chief of Police, who will circulate a
ballot among all police officers. The officers receiving the
most votes will be appointed to the Board. The Board will elect
a chairman that will assure that the Board does the following:
1. reviews all applications/portfolios of Skill
Proficiency Plan applicants, and notifies the
candidate, the Chief of Police, and the Personnel
Office of the results of the review, within 10 days
of the Board review.
2. makes recommendations for the administration of the
plan.
3. sets standards for the training components and
advises the Training Officer on training
procedures/opportunities.
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
It is understood that officers involved in the Skill
Proficiency Plan must at all times maintain satisfactory
performance. If an officer falls below the County's criteria for
satisfactory performance on annual evaluations or below standards
within individual skill areas, they will be removed from the
Skill Proficiency Plan until the following year, when
satisfactory performance must be achieved. If at any time during
the year an is placed on a major plan of assistance, they wil]
also be removed from the Skill Proficiency Plan.
Questions regarding the Skill Proficiency Plan should be
addressed to the Chief or the Review Board. Appeals shall be
addressed through normal departmental p~ocedures. Violations of
the procedural aspects of this plan may be directed throug~ the
County grievance procedure.
,
() lJ (; :; t ion c; r- I ~ , ;.J t-,j i n (1 l_ h (~ '; ki 1] I) r- () r i c j I' I) , ' \! ;) 11 :, :1 li il d ');'
addcc:;<;cd to the i';,icf- <,c ii-l(; I<J;'JlCW '''()1!-I]. 1\1)I)C.11 ';ll<1 \1 iw
dcldr-c:;:;r;:] Ute(),]e)h nOCf:1a] <le~pdct;;\enl-_<11 :,nlc(;dut>;:;. '.'jl,ldtlonc< of
the D cO c e d u r a 1 as D e c t S 0 f: t his D 1 a n [:1 a y i) e d ire c t (? . j t 1'1 r () u CJ 1'1 the
County qrievance procedure.
"
'/
C$\. f[~' .m...... t1~.- ,1
., , . .'~. ., I,. I'''' r I .
" t, ,-\ -'; ~_ _ ,: '!'
(.l.....~iqr*.;i ...:,...... ~)." ~-\.'.". i.~ \ ",.i..l
;; '\Y)' ..'U' ;. " U './,;' ,,:
~! '.:.. ,'i ...'
r ~. ,: _~ ,: :
,i'~ I
."--' ,.' ......j
....... .......-.
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall Jr
SCo1l5ville
Edward H Bain, Jr
Samuel Miller
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Waiter F Perkins
While Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
FROM:
Hoyt B. Alford, III, Civil Engineer
Engineering Department 1,_ )
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~~
February 6, 1992
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Roads into the State System of Secondary
Highways
At its meeting on February 5, 1992, the Board of Supervisors
adopted the following resolutions:
~ ~~~, :>
1)
Resolution to have Rosemont Drive and Rosewood Lane in
Rosemont Subdivision taken into the State System of
Secondary Highways;
2) Resolution to have Windrift Drive in Windrift Subdivi-
sion, Section II, taken into. the State System of Secon-
dary Highways; and
3) Resolution to have Walnut Creek Park Road in Walnut Creek
taken into the State System of Secondary Highways.
Attached are copies of the resolutions.
LEN:ec
Attachments: Original and 3 copies of each
eo: Joooph W. Richmond, Jr.
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
the Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
ment, the following road in Windrift Subdivision, Section II:
Windrift Drive
Beginning at Station 00+25, a point common to the center-
line of Windrift Drive and the edge of pavement of State
Route 664, thence in a southwest direction 3104.81 feet
to Station 31+29.81, the end of the cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed
right-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
as recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 717, page 190 and Deed Book
1132, page 274.
* * * * *
',}(.~> (~,:'..:
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby cert~fy that the foregoing is a
true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Albemarle County, Virgin~'a, at regular meeting held on
February 5, 1992. ~~
Cl rk, Board of County
.~.
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.l-229,
the Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
ment, the following road in Walnut Creek Park:
Walnut Creek Park Road
Beginning at Station 0+25, a point common to the center-
line of Walnut Creek Park Road and the edge of pavement
of State Route 631, thence in a southerly direction
6405.00 feet to Station 64+30.00, the end of the access
road.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot and variable width
right-of-way and drainage ea~ements along this requested addition
as recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1199, pages 171 to 174.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a
true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
February 5, 1992. ~.~~
Cl~k~ard of County Supervisors
-------
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
the Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
ment, the following roads in Rosemont Subdivision:
Rosemont Drive
Beginning at Station 0+40.00, a point common to the
centerline of Rosemont Drive and the edge of pavement of
State Route 637, thence in a southerly direction 3044.03
feet to Station 39+84.03, the end of the cul-de-sac.
Rosewood Lane
Beginning at Station 0+25, a point common to the center-
line of Rosewood Lane and the edge of pavement of Rose-
mont Drive at Station 12+18.07, thence in a northwesterly
direction 554.99 feet to Station 5+79.99, the end of the
cul-de-sac.
Trellis Lane
Beginning at Station 0+25, a point common to the center-
line of Trellis Lane and the edge of pavement of Rosemont
Drive at Station 12+17.16, thence in a northwesterly
direction 295 feet to Station 3+20, the end of the
cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed
right-of-way and drainage easements along these requested additions
as recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 999, pages 427 through 430
and Deed Book 1133, pages 725 and 726.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a
true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Albemarle County, Virgini~ a regular me ing held on
February 5, 1992. ~~
Clerk, Board
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
the Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
ment, the following roads in Rosemont Subdivision:
Rosemont Drive
Beginning at Station 0+40.00, a point common to the
centerline of Rosemont Drive and the edge of pavement of
State Route 637, thence in a southerly direction 3044.03
feet to Station 39+84.03, the end of the cul-de-sac.
Rosewood Lane
Beginning at Station 0+25, a point common to the center-
line of Rosewood Lane and the edge of pavement of Rose-
mont Drive at Station 12+18.07, thence in a northwesterly
direction 554.99 feet to Station 5+79.99, the end of the
cul-de-sac.
Trellis Lane
Beginning at Station 0+25, a point common to the center-
line of Trellis Lane and the edge of pavement of Rosemont
Drive at Station 12+17.16, thence in a northwesterly
direction 295 feet to Station 3+20, the end of the
cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed
right-of-way and drainage easements along these requested additions
as recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 999, pages 427 through 430
and Deed Book 1133, pages 725 and 726.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a
true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Albemarle County, Virgini~ a regular me ing held on
February 5, 1992. ~~
Clerk, Board County Supervisors
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lettie E. Neher, Board of Supervisors Clerk
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Hoyt B. Alford III, civil Engineer ~
Februrary 11, 1992
Rosemont Subdivision - Rosemont Drive, Rosewood Lane
and Trellis Lane
The following is a description of Rosemont Drive, Rosewood Lane
and Trellis Lane.
Rosemont Drive
Beginning at station 0+40.00 a point common to the centerline
of Rosemont Drive and the edge of pavement of State Route
637, thence in a southerly direction 3044.03 feet to station
39+84.03, the end of the cul-de-sac.
Rosewood Lane
Beginning at station 0+25, a point common to the centerline of
Rosewood Lane and the edge of pavement of Rosemont Drive at
station 12+18.07, thence in a northwesterly direction 554.99
feet to station 5+79.99, the end of the cul-de-sac.
Trellis Lane
Beginning at station 0+25, a point common to the centerline of
Trellis Lane and the edge of pavement of Rosemont Drive at
station 26+17.16, thence in a northwesterly direction 295 feet
to station 3+20, the end of the cul-de-sac.
These roads have a fifty foot (50') right of way and have been
built in accordance with the approved road plans. The deed book
references for road right of way and drainage easements are deed
book 999, pages 427 through 430; and deed book 1133, pages 725
and 726.
HBA/
h 8n;lrd: ..J.:..2JJ2:.-,
r:iJ. _~~() :[f~~' I )
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
the Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
ment, the following roads in Rosemont Subdivision:
Rosemont Drive
Beginning at Station 0+40.00, a point common to the
centerline of Rosemont Drive and the edge of pavement of
State Route 637, thence in a southerly direction 3044.03
feet to Station 39+84.03, the end of the cul-de-sac.
Rosewood Lane
Beginning at Station 0+25, a point common to the center-
line of Rosewood Lane and the edge of pavement of
Rosemont Drive at Station 12+18.07, thence in a
northwesterly direction 554.99 feet to Station 5+79.99,
the end of the cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed
right-of-way and drainage easements along these requested additions
as recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 999, pages 427 through 430
and Deed Book 1133, pages 725 and 726.
* * * * *
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
: .I f r: '
.:.\:-~ l.~f:
. ,
~ .i
, , ,
'.~ ; i
; l ~ \
i
I
" , : i I
~. .:'/ ,!~' : I
._ ,..: I
",.- ' . . 'J
.i ,~ ,
:.1 '
MEMORANDUM
j","
-.--- ; ;::, .....~ :,"1'1""
.......,,'1'vV.\..,:)
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Lettie E. Neher, Board of Supervisors Clerk
Hoyt B. Alford III, civil Engineer .~~
January 17, 1992
Rosemont Subdivision - Rosemont Drive and Rosewood
Lane
The following is a description of Rosemont Drive and Rosewood
Lane.
Rosemont Drive
Beginning at station 0+40.00 a point common to the centerline
of Rosemont Drive and the edge of pavement of State Route
637, thence in a southerly direction 3044.03 feet to station
39+84.03, the end of the cul-de-sac.
Rosewood Lane
Beginning at station 0+25, a point common to the centerline of
Rosewood Lane and the edge of pavement of Rosemont Drive at
station 12+18.07, thence in a northwesterly direction 554.99
feet to station 5+79.99, the end of the cul-de-sac.
These roads have a fifty foot (50') right of way and have been
built in accordance with the approved road plans. The deed book
references for road right of way and drainage easements are deed
book 999, pages 427 through 430; and deed book 1133, pages 725
and 726.
HBAI
,.",~
.
/
!
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
January 8, 1992
Mr. Michael T. Boggs
Vice President
Haley, Chisholm & Morris, Inc.
PO Box 7807
Charlottesville, VA 22906
Dear Mr. Boggs:
Your revised request to have roads in Rosemont, Section I
(Rosemont Drive, Rosewood Lane and Trellis), taken into the State
Secondary System of Highways has been received and referred to the
County Engineer. When she has certified that all work has been
completed in accordance with approved plans, this request will be
placed before the Board of Supervisors for adoption of the
necessary resolution.
LEN:ec
cc: Jo Higgins, County Engineer
,#'
HALEY, CHISHOLM & MORRIS, INC.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
P. O. BOX 7807 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22906
(804) 978-1000 FAX (804) 974-6849
January 7, 1992
County of Albemarle
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Attn: Ms. Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Re: Rosemont, Section One
Final Acceptance of Streets
Dear Ms. Neher:
We hereby revise our request for a resolution from the Board of
Supervisors to accept the streets in Section One, Rosemont into the State
maintenance system to include only Rosemont Drive, Rosewood Lane and Trellis
Lane, thereby deleting Rosedell Lane.
Rosedell Lane presently only serves one owner-occupied residence. Rosewood
Lane serves three owner-occupied residences and Rosemont Drive serves thirteen.
Trellis lane only serves two owner-occupied residences, however, we
believe special circumstances justify its acceptance at this time. This street
as originally planned, was to serve four lots (12, 13,14 and 15). Lot 12 is
owner-occupied and, in addition, has constructed a guesthouse. Lots 13 and 14
were purchased by Mr. Ron Marcus, the owner of the adjacent Ragged Mountain
Farm. Access to Trellis lane was granted to Ragged Mountain Farm for traffic
serving its owner-occupied residence, guesthouse and for emergency vehicles.
Ron Marcus has fenced in Lots 13 and 14, established alfalfa hay on each lot
and constructed a rock-walled entrance and tree-lined, paved driveway from
Trellis Lane to Ragged Mountain Farm. He has no intention of building on, nor
selling either Lot 13 or 14. Permission was received from Albemarle County
Planning Department and VDOT in 1988 to relocate the entrance to Lot is, which
is owner-occupied, from Trellis Lane directly onto Rosemont Drive.
This situation is destined to remain well into the future. It would not be
fair to the owners of Lot 12, who purchased their home in June 1989, to be
denied the right of state maintenance.
VDOT will have the advantage of less maintenance on Trellis Lane which was
designed to serve five lots, but is serving only 2 owner-occupied residences
and 2 guesthouses.
"
HALEY, CHISHOLM & MORRIS, INC.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
p, O. BOX 7807 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22906
(804) 978-1000 FAX (804) 974-6849
Page 2
Section One, Rosemont
Attn: Ms. Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
However, the main advantage to VDOT is the reduced maintenance to S.R.
681, a narrow, .7 mile gravel road which serves only Ragged Mountain Farm and
its tenant houses, due to this virtual elimination of traffic serving the main
residence and guest house.
We have attached a map to help clarify the Trellis Lane situation. The
final inspection has been completed on these three streets, and we are prepared
to post the necessary maintenance bond and fees.
We appreciate your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
.~
Michael T. Boggs
Vice President
MTB/mwc
Attachment
cc: Department of Engineering
Hoyt B. Alford, III
i I
il'
'\~' .:';..r>:,
. I ~ . ,( I
,;, .': ."PAi1CI!L '11"
.' ., a.lou .C.
,I
12 Aca <.;t€ 0 Mou
r- ....frAlf".J
r- A r'2^,\
. I.....
( ~."
, !
.'4..
./
'. :~. "
"
@~~)]
g...., I /n" .
U:' UlJ 0
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
November 19, 1990
Chorlotte Y Humphris
,Jitek ,Jouett
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
F. R (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T Way
Scottsville
Mr. Michael T. Boggs
Haley, Chisholm & Morris, Inc.
Post Office Box 7807
Charlottesville, Virginia 22906
Dear Mr. Boggs:
Your request to have roads in Rosemont, Section I (Rosemont
Drive, Rosedell Lane, Rosewood Lane and Trellis Lane), taken into
the State Secondary System of Highways has been received and has
been referred to the County Engineer. When he has certified that
all work has been completed in accordance with approved plans, this
request will be placed before the Board of Supervisors for adoption
of the necessary resolution.
Very truly yours,
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
len/
cc: Mr. Richard Moring, County Engineer
"
HALEY, CHISHOLM & MORRIS, INC.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
P. O. BOX 7807 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22906
(804) 978-1000
November 19, 1990
;,/i, ,) ::'; ( .
.., -' I,.
Ms. Lettie Neher, Clerk
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596
Re: Rosemont Subdivision
Dear Ms. Neher:
We hereby request a resolution from the Board of Supervisors to accept the
streets in Section I, Rosemont, into the State maintenance system. These
streets are more particularly described as Rosemont Drive, Rosedell Lane,
Rosewood Lane, and Trellis Lane.
If you need additonal information, please contact our office.
/Jk4t. rely, " ~
,-~
/
Michael T. Boggs
Vice President
MTB/jjt
""
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
the Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
ment, the following road in walnut Creek Park:
Walnut Creek Park Road
Beginning at Station 0+25, a point common to the center-
line of Walnut Creek Park Road and the edge of pavement
of State Route 631, thence in a southerly direction
6405.00 feet to Station 64+30.00, the end of the access
road.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot and variable width
right-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
as recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1199, pages 171 to 174.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a
true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
February 5, 1992. ~..~~/
Cl~k~ard of County Supervisors
..
"3"''12
qZ.(;ZC~-( 5-,:3)
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
the virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
ment, the following road in Walnut Creek Park:
Walnut Creek Park Road
Beginning at Station 0+25, a point common to the center-
line of Walnut Creek Park Road and the edge of pavement
of State Route 631, thence in a southerly direction
6405.00 feet to Station 64+30.00, the end of the cul-de-
sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot and variable width
right-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
as recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1199, pages 171 to 174.
* * * * *
..
COlJNTY OF ALBEMARLrel:'.~\lr,~.,?~~:!~EMARU:"
" ,I. n;.-...-.,I.....~..
. "" f'
;' I, I
., .1 J f
l '1.'! I
;' 11
I : I
, '-
.:
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lettie E. Neher, Board of Supervisors Clerk
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Hoyt B. Alford III, civil Engineer ~~
January 29, 1992
Walnut Creek Park - Walnut Creek Park Road
The following is a description of Walnut Creek Park Road which
is located in the Walnut Creek Park.
WALNUT CREEK PARK ROAD
----------------------
Beginning at station 0+25, a point common to the centerline
of Walnut Creek Park Road and the edge of pavement of State
Route 631, thence in a southerly direction 6405.00 feet to
station 64+30.00, the end of the access road.
This road has a fifty foot (50') and variable width right-of-way
and has been built in accordance with the approved road plans.
The deed book reference for right-of-way dedication and drainage
easements is deed book 1199, page 171 to 174.
HBA/
C01JNTY OF ALBEMARLE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM COllNI PI'V (lC r,.! P[(./ii\RLE
~. "'.J 1 .,' I " ....~ (.-'
. . \ ... ",' \ ,~: ,Mj ;." r;Ti':11"Gl
Lettie E. Neher, Board of supervisors Cl~t::~(;i':~;''''\\ i, \1\\\
1;\; \ '" J I,
Hoyt B. Alford III, civil Engineer 1J,~ U\\>;'::;..".. U \r--{~;::)L::0
Gt) :) ()F S~_~,Ff~R\l}SC)::<S
February 5, 1992
windrift Subdivision - Windrift Drive
The following is a description of Windrift Drive which is
located in the Windrift Subdivision.
WINDRIFT DRIVE
Beginning at station 00+25, a point common to the centerline
of Windrift Drive and the edge of pavement of State Route
664, thence in a southwest direction 3104.81 feet to
station 31+29.81, the end of the cuI de sac.
This road has a fifty foot (50') right-of way and has been built
in accordance with the approved road plans. The deed book
references for right-of-way dedication and drainage easements
are deed book 1132, page 274 and deed book 717, page 190.
HBA/
POSI.il'"routlng
BR,o,NI;)
REQUEST
,.~ .J0_L92__.
:::i', r,(), In. o~,~.~.) (s:,~)
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-229,
the Virginia Department of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject
to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Depart-
ment, the following road in Windrift Subdivision, Section II:
Windrift Drive
Beginning at Station 00+25, a point common to the center-
line of Windrift Drive and the edge of pavement of State
Route 664, thence in a southwest direction 3104.81 feet
to Station 31+29.81, the end of the cul-de-sac.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed
right-of-way and drainage easements along this requested addition
as recorded by plats in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 1132, page 274.
* .. *
i ' ~J
~ F ,j1fl
C01JNTY OF ALBEMARLE
COil',>", ,- ~
f'r.:.,I ; I, I ,',., I' ','i~~tA.:-jRlrf~EI
' I "'\. I
I ,~~ 1 ,'/, ~, r': ," \ .1 I I
U:' " ":"..';:"~;2 JU)J'I.!I'
t/ , , ,,;' (,'-.'"T" I
8"' ", . ".' . .' ". '" / '.' ~.' I ',._, I .J
.or. l: '''~ ~,'; I,) ..\ I'~' " l' -"'-.1.
l. f :.JLt)C.t1ViSO~S
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lettie E. Neher, Board of Supervisors Clerk
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Hoyt B. Alford III, civil Engineer f~
January 29, 1992
windrift Subdivision - Windrift Drive
The following is a description of Windrift Drive which is
located in the Windrift Subdivision.
WINDRIFT DRIVE
Beginning at station 00+25, a point common to the centerline
of Windrift Drive and the edge of pavement of State Route
664, thence in a southwest direction 3104.81 feet to
station 31+29.81, the end of the cuI de sac.
This road has a fifty foot (50') right-of way and has been built
in accordance with the approved road plans. The deed book
reference for right-of-way dedication and drainage easements is
deed book 1132, page 274.
HBAI
/'> '~ \D) \~rr
@@ifu
Edward H Baln, Jr.
S.mu.l MII~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
June 28, 1990
Charlotte Y Humphns
Jacl-. JoUE'tt
David P, Bowerman
ChMlotlelvlllo
Walter F Pl'Tkms
",'hlh.' HaE
F. R. (Rick) Bowle
Rtvenna
Peter T Wa,'
Scottsvlll"
Mr. William W. Bailey
President, Bailey Contruction
1455 East Rio Road
Post Office Box 6700
Charlottesville, Virginia 22906
Dear Mr. Bailey:
Your request to have the roads in Windrift II taken into the
State Secondary System of Highways was received yesterday and has
now been referred to the County Engineer. When he has certified
that all work has been completed in accordance with approved plans,
this request will be placed before the Board of Supervisors for
adoption of the necessary resolution.
Very truly yours,
~~~
Board of Supervisors
len/
cc: Mr. Richard Moring, County Engineer
BAILEY
CONSTRUCIlON
. . .....1 ..~. .11 ...
II
. a.. :.~. . .
,,<) t.) !\,r ";," \,'" '\'..~; l.
., ;~.; 1-,; }..
. . "'~ t... ':~.,
i ;: !.' .'..' .~.' 1 r-'j r
Junel ;2;5;'Ig<J0"""~'
;.; i
\\ JUN 2G 1990
:,
~ ! (,.,.c,,-~
!' ~ ,
'-';(;-L1':.
Ms Lettie Nehr, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 2290l
Dear Ms Nehr:
Windrift II development of roads has now been completed
in accordance with plans and specifications by Haley, Chisholm
and Morris.
I am writing to request that these roads now be accepted
into the State system.
It is understood that a maintenance bond will be re-
quired for one year.
Your assistance and cooperation is much appreciated.
Sincerely,
~WJ~~
William W. Bailey _
President
WWB/w
"j '7 f.7l
-.'"' ~.
Agcnc:a
[, h <::47 (; .' ",'. ( _ ..)
h'J. ~_ (...'-'-> S l{
~-_...._~
t'r' ~l 8.r~}i'\R; r:
.~' I ': (_ J .~. ; l , , "...... ~
IJ:~ >1 ,~L: -"'. ,to" C-i 2
.; ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
,
....; t.) ..;.__'
~..,,:.::~ ;.. ':~~"
j.~:l;_.~~ I-J
:-'.,'-
:./1, _~ i,; r'.L
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
(Consent Agenda - For Approval February
5. 199.21 ,
and UJ-V
FROM:
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
Community Development
DATE:
January 29, 1992
RE:
SP-90-3l Robert A. & Elizabeth K. Wilson
(Little Keswick School) - Relief from Condition #4
Mr. Robert A. Wilson has requested relief from the above-referenced
condition due to a new purchaser on behalf of the Little Keswick School
of the East Rivanna Fire Company property (see Attachment A). The
original intent of Condition #4 (see Attachment B) was to require all
property under common ownership (Mr. and Mrs. Wilson's) and devoted to
the school's use by special use permit be consolidated. This would
assure the simplest record keeping and that portions of the school
property would not "stand alone" and be subject to alternative
"piece-meal" special use permits based on the existence of improvements
on any portion of the property.
Staff agrees that, in consideration of the purchase arrangements now
planned for the East Rivanna Fire Company property, combination of this
parcel with the remaining school property is not possible. As a
substitute, the following condition would meet the above mentioned
intent:
4. Use is for the expansion of the Little Keswick School.
Other special use permit conditions in combination with this substitute
condition will limit the use of the parcel. Should alternative uses be
proposed for the fire company property, they will be subject to separate
review. Staff can support Mr. Wilson's request for relief from
condition #4 with the substitute condition referenced above.
VWC/jcw
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Robert A. Wilson
IATTACHMENT AI
A SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL
RECEiVED
.IAN 2 1 1992
PLANNlNG DEPT.
LITTLE KESWICK SCHOOL, INC.
President
Robert A. Wilson, Sr.
Vice-President
Elizabeth K. Wilson
Headmaster
Marc J. Columbus
Director
Anna B. Columbus
January 16, 1992
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Dear Mr. Cilimberg,
In reference to our conversation of 1/16/92, I respectfully
request relief from item number 4 of special use permit SP-90-31,
issued June 6th, 1990 and extended December 11th, 1991 for
eighteen months to June, 1993. This change will enable the
Little Keswick Foundation for Special Education (a non-profit
organization) to purchase the property rather than Mr. and Mrs.
Robert A. Wilson. Therefore, it cannot be added to the existing
parcel as recommended by the commission.
The Little Keswick Foundation for Special Education will own
the property and lease it to Little Keswick School. In the event
that Little Keswick School should cease to function, the
property, namely the old Keswick Depot, would be turned over to
the Keswick Community as a community center.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
~W Q \0~Dtt\
Robert A. Wilson
President
RAW /ka\v
p.o. Box 24 Keswick, Virginia 22947 Telephone 804-295-0457 Fax 804-977-1892
.~ ..;...,.,
IATTACHMENT 81
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Albemarle County Planning Commission
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
June 18, 1990
Robert A. & Elizabeth K. Wilson
P.O. Box 24 .
Keswick, VA 22947
RE: SP~90-31 Robert A. & Elizabeth K. Wilson
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wilson:
The Albemarle County Board of Superviso~s, at its meeting on
June 6, 1990, approved the above-noted request to permit .
. expansion of the Little Keswick School [10.2.2(5)] by
utilizing the existing community building for East Rivanna
Fire Company., Property, consists of 1.0 acre zonedRA,
Rural Areas. Property located on the east side of Rt. 731
approximately 200' south of Rt. 22. Please note that this
approval.is subject to the following conditions:
;
Ii. Virginia Department of Transportation issuance of a
commercial entrance permit in the event of increased
enrollment or paving of Rt. 73'1;
/
112. Virginia Department of Health. approval;
~3. No increase in enrollment; and
~4. Parcel to be combined with'the existing parcel (Parcel
110) prior to the commencement of activity in the
existing Fire Company building.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate 'to contact me.
Community Development
cc: Richard Moring
Jeff Echols
~
...1-...MARLE
COUNTY
IA I I AC,HfVl~NT Cj
,', ,
c
81
,
72
\ ~
\ ;,<
\/
1\ /'
..:(, \'<<'~I~(
. .""-...
"
~.C.All IN :~,.~: ,"00 --,,-~'~"O
...." - -. DISTRICTS
.,.~ - - ,..~ AC.RICUlT'JII\Al &. fORESTAl.
"r.Swlf;K....d IONL
RIVANNA DI'STRICT
SECTlON 80
fi .?, c1,7 (/5 ( 5'- 5 )
Edward H Baln. Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
February 7, 1992
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsvil1e
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
Whit" Hal!
The Honorable John G. Milliken
Secretary of Transportation
Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board
607 9th Street Office Building
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Secretary Milliken:
Recent correspondence from Mr. E. C. Cochran dated January 16, 1992
stated the Commonwealth Transportation Board approved the major
design features to provide for six lanes plus continuous right turn
lanes with signalized at-grade intersections on Route 29 North.
We look forward to these much needed improvements but must
reiterate the necessity for the highway department to pursue the
preliminary design and right-of-way acquisition for the grade
separated interchanges at Rio Road, Hydraulic Road and Greenbrier
Drive. There is full agreement grade separated interchanges will
be necessary. The early acquisition of the rights-of-way is the
least costly action while providing the added benefits of a
commitment to property owners and more prudent long range planning
for these intersections.
Your continued support for grade-separation preliminary design and
acquisition of rights-of-way, sooner rather than later, is
requested.
Sincerely,
v~df~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/dbm
92.005
cc: Mr. Ray D. Pethtel
, .
, [oJ ,'':;,''LA. ~'L' c
...' ""'....~ u. .'
.. U r-.(-r'~/';l1 ::r'\ ',,":' " :';' .:. ".
c. 0 ." "'q"I~'.J...Ii.:,,... ,n.,. ".2' ".
I . .. '.." "v'.. 1-<..0<-,.>( ~- _}
rTil. r"- ". .. ,~.-- j
n, r'- I '
Ill' :".. '
\ I ;' ,~ '; I
; ~ I t, ill \
\J .', . ,\ \,<}r) ~r:';q') ~", ;.
i i' ( \ ,..,i\ 1\\ .,ii'" I j . ... ( . !. ' I
"\ \ \ ..~....,,_j I". l.
1.1, \ ,\ \ ,...." ";:;''''::.:'; I U i '-- I ~
\." l.~::::i l~::;"1 l...;.,j ,,~ ~._1 .
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI~OAF\D Of SUPERV1SOqS
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219
EARL C, COCHRAN. JR.
STATE LOCATION AND DESIGN ENGINEER
January 16, 1992
Route 29
Proj. 6029-002-119,CS01,CS02
Albemarle County
Fr: Route 743 (Hydraulic Road)
To: South End of Bridge over
South Fork Rivanna River
Mr. David P. Bowerman
Chairman, Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
401 Berwick Court
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Bowerman:
I would like to take this opportunity to advise that the
Commonwealth Transportation Board of Virginia at its meeting
today approved the major design features of the above project as
proposed and presented at the October 30, 1986, public hearing
with modifications to provide for six lanes plus continuous
right turn lanes with signalized at-grade intersections.
Sincerely, ~
c=. )..
c::... ,c ,C---=-=-~:"
E. C. Cochran, Jr., P.E.
State Location and Design Engineer
, r" I ,.- ft-
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
Y-..r'
C.
, . :~ j
~.~
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA~
I,) V I. .::;, I~j,
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND,23219
EARL C. COCHRAN. JR.
STATE LOCAllONAND DESIGN ENGINEER
January 16, 1992
Route 29
Proj. 6029-002-119,C501,C502
Albemarle County
Fr: Route 743 (Hydraulic Road)
To: South End of Bridge over
South Fork Rivanna River
Mrs. Shelby J. Marshall
Clerk of the Court
Albemarle County
501 E. Jefferson Court Square
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mrs. Marshall:
I would like to take this opportunity to advise that the
Commonwealth Transportation Board of Virginia at its meeting
today approved the major design features of the above project as
proposed and presented at the October 30, 1986, public hearing
with modifications to provide for six lanes plus continuous
right turn lanes with signalized at-grade intersections.
Sincere.lY' . . ~.
~ .c... C.-= c~
E. C. Cochran, Jr., P.E.
State Location and Design Engineer
~
J.()
:j ~
r~~}
..: -.~ .
_~.u
(.
l~iJ
___B
.."....
u:
~.. ,
_r '"-. -.-.
~."i o(.~'
u
c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:J
en
N
R.~ '"
Z
Ilt:''\''''"
-::;
N
.3'1
"7.".
.~ ."" f~~:
~~,~ ;J ~
";:-...
.-1w>-.~
-..f)(D
~~ "~1~
~. l/)
()
t:;;r;'I:.;_.:il
M
N
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
~ Ii ~.to;, .~ l
J.3( (12.
(;', ""--~.~''''''->-.--"'''~
..~-3.:~.:c)~:<:~..) )
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
"-'-i,
,} <.
January 22, 1992
,
..
f.3()J\;:;':~..:; t~i' ~')U;' t.!\ ViSOi:(S
Joseph W. Richmond, Jr.
P. O. Box 559
Charlottesville, VA 22902-0559
...
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - section 10.3.1
Tax Map 65, Parcel 15; Property of Thurber M. Foreman, III
Dear Mr. Richmond:
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the information you have
submitted for the above-noted property. It is the County
Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination, that
this property consists of four (4) separate parcels:
(#1) of 165.7 acres; another (#2) of 44.56 acres;
another (#3) of 22.9 acres; and the last (combined
#4, 5, 6 and 7) of 93.3 acres.
Each of these lawfully separate parcels is entitled to associated
development rights.
This determination considered the descriptive clauses of the deed,
which delineate the property as consisting of four (4) parcels.
This deed enumerates seven (7) parcels. However; the last
paragraph of the description references four (4) acreages as
forming "together a tract of 93.3 acres." Therefore, these four
(4) acreages are one lot. This consideration is based on the
findings of the Va. Supreme Court in the case, Faison v. Union
Camp 224 VA 54.
The most recent deed of record as of the date of adoption of the
Zoning Ordinance is found in Deed Book 427, Page 189. It is dated
April 1, 1967 from cunninghams to Schwartzmans. This deed
describes the following parcels:
1) Parcel #1 of 165.7 acres, described by DB 250, Page 594 - (5
development rights);
r
January 22, 1992
Joseph W. Richmond, Jr.
Page 2
2) Parcel #2 of 44.56 acres, described by DB 233, Page 492 - (5
development rights);
3) Parcel #3 of 22.9 acres, described by DB 296, Page 375 - (5
development rights);
4) Parcel #4, 5, 6, and 7 of 26, 29.7, 16.94 and 20.91 acres
respectively. These form together a tract/parcel of 93.3
acres, described by DB 291, Page 64 - (5 development rights) .
Anyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have any
questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
~fY1,PL-
Amelia M. Patterson
Zoning Administrator
AMP/sP!Si
cc: Jan sprinkle
Gay Carver
Estelle Neher, Clerk to Board of Supervisors
Reading Files
Thurber Foreman
NOTE:
Three (3) additional parcel(s)
One (1) by Tax Map, Four (4) by determination
b Goard: _/'11' (1 Z_
~> <f.2.(;.;2r/:,.-(j-;Y)
f~V.
P\gc~;~!,J
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
en' , ;\1,..,./ ,__ _ .
~ " ; '.'. ": l .<.: ". ,!; l., 7",. '.)
J "i:';"l (. '. . _ - -' ... ." , ~ :: L E.
/1/: .
1 . ,~ : t "I 1 "\ ~:.
J; ':
t:
- )
i
I
E;~.\..~.
i...' t;-
,
. I
, ;!I
"-,J
,""',...
'~'.f ;~~ C"
.. \...)
January 27, 1992
Ruby C. Garnett
Nancy G. Osborne
Rt 2, Box 165 B
Charlottesville, VA 22901
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PARCELS - section 10.3.1
Tax Map 57, Parcel 68A
Dear Ms. Garnett and Ms. Osborne:
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the chain of title you
have submitted for the above-noted property. It is the County
Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination, that
this property consists of one (1) parcel.
Each parcel is entitled to associated development rights. This
determination results in one (1) parcel, which is the same as is
shown with a parcel number on the County tax maps.
This determination considered the descriptive clauses of the deed,
which delineate and enumerate the property as consisting of one
(1) tract. This consideration is based on the findings of the Va.
Supreme Court in the case, Faison v. Union Camp 224 VA 54.
The most recent deed of record as of the date of adoption of the
Zoning Ordinance is found in Deed Book 410, Page 485. It is dated
August 27, 1965 from Abell to Garnett. This deed describes the
following parcel:
"All of that certain tract or parcel of land containing 4.80
acres according to the plat of James E. Dorsey, C.L.S., dated
August 1965...on the eastern side of Route 680".
January 27, 1992
D-91-07 Garnett/Osborne
Page 2
Anyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have any
questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
(};rJu
Amelia M. Patterson
Zoning Administrator
AMP/sp !,,"'f
J" I
cc: Jan Sprinkle
Gay Carver
Estelle Neher, Clerk to Board of Supervisors
Reading Files
NOTE:
Zero (0) additional parcel(s)
One (1) by Tax Map, One (1) by determination
..
~ ~'-- (..<,1:
('}l-'i7-
f~. C)~ c)j-{..l.... 5" )
c., ;.,,, " ;.
Hugh C. Miller, Director
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street COUNT'{ C'. _
Richmond, Virginia 23219 ;.,':.-. ," ,
TOO: (804) 786-1934
. TetePiione (804) 786-3143
FAX;._~804) 225-4261
January 15, 1992
Jin.
,.
. <.
8i",
, <.'
(,C
.J:
; ~~;O\~f
Frederick R. Bowie, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, V A 22901
RE: Merrie Mill, Albemarle County, 02-49
Dear Mr. Bowie:
Recently the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Commonwealth's agency
responsible for administering historic preservation programs, received information regarding
the history and significance of the Merrie Mill. This information was submitted by Jean
Fulton for the owner, Mrs. R. E. Lee Gildea, along with a request that the department
conduct a preliminary evaluation of the property to determine whether it is eligible for listing
on the National Register of Historic Places and the Virginia Landmarks Register. I must
emphasize that this evaluation does not constitute a formal action to add this property to those
registers.
The National Register and Virginia Landmarks Register are lists of properties important for
their prehistoric and/or historical associations. Only those properties found to be significant
for their associations with events or persons or determined to be good examples of an
architectural style or method of construction are eligible for inclusion on the registers.
Additionally, properties must meet age and integrity standards.
Inclusion on the registers applies no restrictions regarding what the owner may do with his
property. Registration makes a property eligible for protection and financial incentives such
as easement donations, tax credits for rehabilitation and grant funds, not available to
unregistered properties. More importantly, registration is a way of honoring the significance
of a historic property and recording its history and appearance by collecting information that
becomes a permanent record in the Department's archives.
.
The information submitted about this property has been considered by the department's
National Register Evaluation Team, a group of staff representing a variety of disciplines and
agency programs, at one of its semi-monthly meetings. It is the staff's opinion that the
Merrie Mill is an eligible historic resource. While this review is not dependent upon an
owner's consent, we are notifying the owner and you of the department's evaluation so that
you can participate in this process should you so desire, and so that you may know to contact
us should you have any questions.
We will make a recommendation that this property is an eligible historic resource to the State
Review Board, an advisory group consisting of preservation professionals from throughout
the state. We anticipate that the board will consider the staff recommendation regarding the
eligibility at its upcoming meeting. Meetings of the board are open to the public. The
meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 18th, 1992, at the Virginia Housing and
Development Authority, 601 South Belvidere, Richmond, beginning at !0:00am. As with the
staff's evaluation, the Review Board's conclusion does not constitute any formal action to
nominate this property to the registers.
If the Review Board concludes that this property is eligible for registration, the applicant or
any other interested party may wish to prepare and submit the more extensive formal register
nomination. Prior to any action to register the property, federal regulations require the
department to notify the owner, as well as local officials, and give both the opportunity to
express opinions on the nomination before any formal action is taken. Though the formal
notification requirements come into effect only when a formal nomination is being
considered, we want to call your attention to the fact that the historical significance of this
property is being considered and we would welcome any additional information you may
wish to share with us.
The enclosed materials should explain in more detail the register process and the implications
of listing. However, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
~y,
H. Bry
Deputy
Enclosures
~
Hugh C Miller, Director
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
TOO (804) 786-1934
Telephone (804) 786-3143
FAX: (804) 225-4261
NATIONAL REGISTER PROCESS IN VIRGINIA
Preliminary Information Form (pIP) -----Department of Historic Resources
received and reviewed, additional (ORR) archives checked for property
information requested if necessary ftle and any additional information
PIP reviewed and rated by National ------Owner and consultant informed of
Register Evaluation Team- at monthly team recommendation, additional
meeting information requested if necessary
PIP goes to State Review Board for ------Owner and consultant notified of
review and recommendation (Board Board's decision
meets every other month)
IF STATE REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDS NOMINATION:
Preparer of nomination consults with Department staff regarding criteria,
areas of significance, period of significance and boundaries.
DeI>artment staff reviews nomination ----COMPLETE nomination due to DHR
drafts upon request and provides seven weeks prior to meeting of
technical assistance State Review Board and Virginia
Board of Historic Resources
Department staff reviews completed -----Owner, consultant and local
nomination officials notified no less than
30 days prior to State Review
Board meeting
Copies of nomination sent to members --Nomination presented at State
of both Boards two weeks prior to Review Board meeting. If approved,
meeting State Review Board recommends that
nomination be forwarded to Keeper
of the National Register, Virgima
Board of Historic Resources lists
pro~rty on the Virginia Landmarks
Register
Owner and consultant notified of ---------Nomination is forwarded to the
Boards' decisions Keeper of the National Register
in Washington, D.C.
Pro]?erty is logged in at National ---------Following 45 day review period,
RegIster office Department is notified of decision
Owner, consultant and local officials
notified of Keeper's decision
Hugh C Miller, Director
COMMONWEALTfi of VIRGINIA
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond. Virginia 23219
TOO: (804) 786-1934
Telephone (804) 786-3143
FAX: (804) 225-4261
RESULTS OF LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Eligibility for Federal tax provisions: If a property is listed in the National
Register, certain federal tax provisions may apply. The Tax Reform Act of
1986 revises the historic preservation tax incentives authorized by Congress in
the Tax Reform Act of 1976, the Revenue Act of 1978, The Tax Treatment
Extension Act of 1980, the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, and the Tax
Reform Act of 1984 and as of January 1, 1987, provides for a 20 percent
investment tax credit with a full adjustment to basis for rehabilitating historic,
commercial, industrial, and residential rental buildings. The former 15 percent
and 20 percent investment tax credits for rehabilitation of older commercial
buildings are combined into a single 10 percent investment tax credit for
commercial or industrial buildings built before 1936. The Tax Treatment
Extension Act of 1980 provides federal tax deductions for charitable
contributions for conservation purposes of partial interests in historically
important land areas or structures. Whether these provisions are advantageous
to a property owner is dependent upon the particular circumstances of the
property and the owner. Because tax aspects outlined above are complex,
individuals should consult legal counselor the appropriate local Internal
Revenue Service office for assistance in determining the tax consequences of
the above provisions. For further information on certification requirements,
please refer to 36 CFR 67.
Consideration in planning for Federal, Federally licensed, and Federally
assisted projects: Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 requires that Federal agencies allow for the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation to have an opportunity to comment on all projects affecting
historic properties listed in the National Register. For further information,
please refer to 36 CFR 800.
Consideration in issuing a surface coal mining permit: In accordance with
the Surface Mining and Control Act of 1977, there must be consideration of
historic values in the decision to issue a surface coal mining permit where coal
is located. For further information, please refer to 30 CFR 700 et seq.
Qualification for Federal grants for historic preservation when funds are
available: Funding is unavailable at present.
/'-j/.,=,;..J.-..;
Dlstribut:Q tJ BCJrd: --.'
1,: q;2.42.CI~::'''''' w)
AgC.iidi; .,). ---
s-v.'" OF v/.f.
~"'~ C.
~ ~ '1;.
.:::i~.~7
111111
1819
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
TELEPHONE: (804) 924-3252
FAX: (804) 982-2770
January 22, 1992
Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Albemarle County Executive
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Bob:
As you know, Harry Porter, Dean of the School of
Architecture, assumed an additional responsibility as the
Architect for the University effective January 1, 1992. As such,
he will have overall responsibility for the University's
facilities master planning, and will chair our Master Planning
Council.
In view of this responsibility, we have asked Harry to serve
as a University member of the PACC Technical Committee, through
which facilities and land use planning by the City, County, and
the University are coordinated under the three-party agreement.
Harry will take the place of Richard Laurance, who has served on
an interim basis since Werner Sensbach's retirement last year.
eonard . Sandridge
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
LWS/tfw
cc: Mr. Harry W. Porter, Jr.
Mr. Richard B. Laurance
C,....II~,ITY OF ALB~:'.~"lr:" f:'
Uv I 1 .... '.'II ,1 d...
~' . ,'- . "'" ":':Jl..
( ';C:i-.:_L' ~
[: JAN 24 IS0)
[; . \.
~ ;! :';~~-"''''-"~~"-:7'r;;:
.a
J"
,.
. ~~ ~.
;.J:
_~t, -~
, ~,.
EXECUTIVE O(tiCS
"
POST OFFICE BOX 9014 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22906-9014
.'
+
. 1'51.'12-
CnUf,rry.o.r,,: t,. L":::c" i\ "'1'
o ....,.: \I. '. -I ,r,J...~.,L:....,:.:,~i"'\r'\ l_r.:.
~;;\.". "1~..;f/o< ,(J441,~- (~-;. II)
r: i'- iL:;.?_SL. ;''1. ' i,
~<
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
L, \ Ji\N2R lOG?
I, , / ::j
t .~ t t, ~t'yl;'~:,1.~ ; -;~ .:,;);":f' .~.;;,.:J
(- \( r: {\ !,' "1-. V -2 -f,'.'-{il p: l"r'd:
'.__'\""_.1 t ;- ,,_ VJ. :oJ~.
l~. ~; i'-'f
MEMORANDUM
, . .~...
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Robert W. Tucker, County Executive
Amelia M. Patterson, Zoning Administrator ~
January 27, 1992
Official Determination of No Special Use Permit
Needed - Keswick Golf Maintenance Facility
This memorandum is provided for your information and to be
forwarded to the Board of Supervisors. No action is necessary.
The golf maintenance facility proposed as part of the Keswick Inn
golf course was not shown or discussed in the special use permits
under which the resort was approved. Nor was the property
proposed for the maintenance facility included in the list of
properties approved for the golf course by special use permit.
However, the Zoning Administrator and the Director of Planning
and Community Development have concurred that, subject to certain
conditions relating to the use and the structure, this proposal
is in substantial accord with the approved special permits on the
Keswick properties and would not require a new special use permit
or amendment to one of the existing special use permits.
This determination is based on several findings:
1. It is logical to expect that such a facility would be
required as part of a golf course.
2. The general location proposed for the maintenance
facility was shown for the sewage treatment plant and
has since received site plan approval for same.
Locating two non-residential uses, capable of being
some nuisance to residential neighbors, on the same
parcel is sound planning.
3. The structure is not inconsistent with those found on
farms to shelter farm equipment.
Keswick Golf Maintenance Facility
January 27, 1992
Page 2
4. The structure would be buffered from existing and
proposed residential properties and public roads.
Approval of this facility is subject to the following conditions:
1. Architectural review and approval by the County Design
Planner for the Architectural Review Board (ARB) to
insure that the golf maintenance facility is compatible
with the sewage treatment plant approved by the ARB,
and with the residential and agricultural character of
the district.
2. The uses allowed for this structure shall be limited to
maintenance and landscaping work associated with the
golf course, grounds and gardens of the Keswick Inn,
and the administrative offices required to supervise
these functions only.
3. Any future expansion of this facility shall require
separate review and may require a special use permit.
Once these conditions have been met to the satisfaction of the
Zoning Administrator and the facility has satisfied the
requirements of the site review process, the golf maintenance
facility will be approved, with no amendment to the existing
special use permit or new special use permit required. Anyone
aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal within
thirty (30) days of the date of this letter.
cc: Keswick Acquisition Corporation
Richard Tarbell
SP-80-008
Reading File
~!;,r r'jB!:~; ~e;;j/.,"::":~\~:..,U~~:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
r:::.1 0::::J [C~,nILn rr"'J f;::~1
\ l
!( . l i I
n\\ ..'AN 801992 )d i
IL\ t~~'LS'ITlJ~ ill
BOAQO OF SUPERVISO~S
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item I:
q:2. IJ c2 () s I ~-, I.).. )
Title: City/County Park Fees (Consent Agenda for Information)
Issue: At the January 15, 1992 Board meeting, concern was raised
regarding non-resident fees for use of Pen Park. At that time, the
Board requested that staff provide additional information regarding
the differences in the City and County non-resident policies.
Recommendation: For information.
/dbm
92.035
!:Y: "~,
; ", _L.1J.3-?::._.
. ,', c.;~-:I.LJ
,.:.;. --
r~:.~ t ",
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Parks and Recreation Department
County Office Building
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5845
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
FROM: Patrick K. Mullaney, Director, Parks & Recreation/~h1
DATE: January 28, 1992
RE: City/County Fees
Per your request, enclosed please find the rates for golf at
Pen Park.
As a general rule, the City charges the same differential as
the County for non-residents in classes and programs in that non-
residents typically pay 50% more than residents. As you can see
from the enclosure for golf, the City does not charge a
significantly higher fee for non-residents for daily play. For a
9 hole weekday round, a resident adult pays $8 and a non-resident
adult $9. While there are slightly higher fees for weekend play
and slightly lower fees for junior or senior citizens, the
differential remains $1 for each 9 holes played. Daily fees for
everyone increased $1 from 1991 to 1992.
For season passes the City maintains the 50% higher fee for
non-residents. For instance a resident adult will pay $450 and a
non-resident will pay $675 in 1992. All season pass rates
increased approximately 20% from 1991 to 1992. Pen Park is a self-
supporting operation. With the addition of the new 9 holes, which
will be playable in the fall, there is a need to increase revenues
to cover the additional expenses.
Admission fees for the County parks are set by the Board of
Supervisors. Season pass rates were last increased for the 1989
swim season. Daily rates were last increased in 1986. Our current
fees are:
MEMORANDUM
PAGE 2
RE: City/County Fees
Resident
Non-Resident
Daily Rates
Adults
Child
$2.00
$1.00
$3.00
$2.00
Season Pass Rates
Adults
Child
Family
Senior/
Handicapped
$35.00
$20.00
$70 / 5
$15 each over 5
FREE
$ 50.00
$ 30.00
$105.00 / 5
$ 20 each over 5
FREE
Park revenues have steadily declined from a peak of $121,000
in 86-87 to $92,000 in 89-90. In 90-91 revenues rebounded slightly
to $96,500. Of course weather impacts park attendance, however I
do think our last season pass increase turned out to be counter
productive. Non-resident daily usage is also significantly down in
comparison to years prior to 1986. For instance in 1985, 12,977
resident adults and 11,131 non-resident adults paid the daily fee
at Chris Greene. In 1991, there were 10,954 resident adults and
only 5,305 non-resident adults paying daily admission.
It would be my recommendation that both resident and non-
resident fees stay the same for the upcoming swim season. I feel
that any revenues gained through increasing fees, especially non-
resident fees, would be more than offset by additional decreases in
attendance. Please call me if you have any questions or if I can
provide any additional information.
PKM/sms
Enclosure
,-.
....
,q.
"
~
.~
en
m
Q
U'-
~
'V
~
o
~
~
P4
r
,
CJ)
~ ~
H Ln
...:10"'"
OZ
:z: ~ {/)o .
lii:4
~
~~O
o 0
~ .
ftl Ln
ftl M
3: {/)o
o 0
o '0
. .
Ln 0
M "'"
{/)o
00
00
. ,;
LnO
LnO
.....
{/)o
00
00
. .
tntn
<o:rr-.
0000
E-tE-t
tl~
00
HO co
rJ)(I)f'ilr-i
r&lHfc1'
P;QJltten
IZ1 co
IZ1 M
IZt ,
0'1
~~ co
OOIZ1....
HUIZ1'
UHIl Jltt en
tl~
co
~ .-t
ftl ,
rz. en
~
~
~
",
~~~
;; c1 q'J
.ri J..f ~a
~ m ~ll)
If-l fI) a Q ~
......... 0 u ~
....;: ; 0 .!t c--
ItS 0 'tJ .. AS
~ J..f'ri fI)'ri..c fIJ
'tJ SJt tn' fn J..f:) IZ1
.ri , elL CD.... ~ fIJ
. :> r::p:; r:: fn~ p;
fIJ E-t.ri 0 '...t ~ IJI t)
Ci..... ~.'g r:: Si~ 'g~ 8
E-tItSQH&.aS:Z;~...tij
~~~ ~
=CDftl- -- 0
uu~ p; ItS. .Q 0 t!J
.....
N
M
{/)o
M'
.....0
(/)010
,.
f'\O
(/)0 {/)o
"'"
.....
(/)0
Ill'
.....0
00 III
........ .
cor--
{/)o 00
"'"
.....
00
Ill'
.....0
(/)0 10
, .
cor-.
{/)o {/)o
\0
.....
{/)o
f"
.....0
0010
,.
0'100
{/)o (/)0
ftl
CJ)
8
u
IZc
H
o .
~ E-4ffl
~~s~
Pt~~r;
~
Z CD .
ftlCD--
.Pt 3: AS.Q
~
-
"'"
.....
'(/)0
........M
0.....
10(/)0
.,
t--f'
{/)o {/)o
\0
.....
00
........Ill
0....
10 (/)0
. ........
coco
(/)0 (/)0
\0
....tn
<1)0 .....
........00
0'
III 00
. (/)0
00
{/)o
co
....
{/)o
'f'
0.....
III {/)o
. ........
0'10'1
<1)0 <1)0
"'"
CJ)
>t
<
o
H
....:l
o
:xl .
~
.. E-t CJ)
~~~
..
.
E-t
<--
CJ)AS.Q
\
rz:l f/) a
o ~ ~
a~~8
I~co I r:il
otO ..~
OUlHO NN
~HZUl . 00 ~
~ C1tUl~H r:.::!C/}
UlUlUlO ,0 >c. O>C Or:il
lCll ot-l ot-l ...:Ir:.::!
....H *~ ~ 0f:r.4
m ~~ :>t
l:O ...:I ~::x::
.co co rz.. 0 \0 0 tOtO rz..o 0 0 ...... H E-l
r-.r-. ~o co \0\0 \ON r-. 0 ~ rs:!0
rz:l MM...:INM .... tOtOt-lM~ N 0 Gl:O
rz:l 0-0-" 0-0- 0- 0-0-" 0-0- 0- . f:r.4 lCll
rz.. O' 0 N "
~ ~ 0- Q f:r.4 .
Z Ors:!
0 Co2
rs:!rs:! ~f:r.4
rz:l C/} CIl C1J:>t
0 ~ g~ ~:J rs:!0
~~~~ :>t
gJOO ~~ Oflt C/}
10 to f:r.4 ~~
HUlOO ~NM 6~ :>t
0 OHHO o 0-0- 0...:1 rs:!
(;] r:.::!UlZCIJ 0 10 IOH C1J:>t
flt~rz:lH r-t:>t ....>c ~~ ~
0 CIl UlO 0-t-l 0-t-l ~ rs:!tO
P4 +H +H J%.t :>tr-l .
i ~::! IOtO::!OO 0 l:O 0 ~~~
r-.r-. 1010 to ...... ~.:;]
P4 r-lrz.. \O\Orz..~tO M 0 P4~P4
0- 0-0- 0-0- 0- to Z
+t-l ...:I . 0 ~OM
00"00 to .. N .H 0
~ IOtOQoo N Q 0- ~E-l J%.tE-lr:il
rz:l ~~~M~ N ~ rs:!H O~
J%.t 0-0- 00 0 ~g ~Z~
PllClf ~~s
::x:: ::J
rilO rilOCll
ZlCll ...:I>C>C
Oril flt lCll
. ~~ 5~~
00 0J%.tr:il
J%.trz.. ~CIJ~
_. - - - CIl~ 000 Oril
Ul Ul, 'f/) CIl ...:Il:O HO Hr:ilZ
~e] :>t :>trz:l ~ ~;;, r-l Zf:r.40
lCll ~t-l ril0- ril
QC1t Q Qflt l:O...:I E-l tI.l~>e
b ::J ril:q1 ~~ 0...:1
!nO to ~. !nO to ~HZ
-0-- -0-- Gl:O .. ZO
CIl Ul ~~ >C~ ~::J
fj~ ~~:~~ rilril:>t ~~~~ ...:Irs:! 01-:)0
Ot-l...:l H:>t H H
~ GH HHQH HG'H HHOH ~:J ZO:q1
Ul ~~ ZZ ~ tI.lZ~ ZZ S G . ~~:>
I ~ rilrilltl rz:lril!n zX f:r.4P4
.. CIlrz.. CIlUl- ~~rz.. CIl CIl - I-:) HO
H I l>~ I I
CIl Z HP4
~ -- -- -. 0--, -- - ~~ ofC
.nj .Q 0'0 tJ'l Z' nj .Q 0'0 t:rl ofC ofC
ofC ofC ofC ofC
ofC ofC ofC ofC ofC ofC ofC
ofC ofC ofC
.
lI'l
00 :'"~:~ +a
' . 00
I - . . ME04NE04
~a\D .... . M
· Ul \D (I) ~(I)
00~""1Z1 .~
m - r:;1r:;l ~:;l
000 UlOUl I. (I)
000 0 0 0 00 Otn Otn
. . . tnI' .~ tnI' 00 01' tnN
ltlOO .Mr--I' '0 . . .... ........
....N.... 00 ..... . .... . NM ~
-(/)0 -(/)0 -(/)0 <1)0 <1)0 <1)0 <1)0 -(/)0 (/)0 m-
OO
00 +
. . +
-N\o N +
~ ~~<I)o ~~~~ M~
. E-t I' E-t ~E-t
- 00 .... .
0 (/)oUl<l)oCf.l ....00
~ 000 I~I~ 7~
2 000 00 otn otn
. . . 00 01' tnN
Pot tnOO OUlOCf.l 00 . . .... ........
....NI"'i 0 0 0 MLO
-(/)0 -(/)0 -(/)0 .0'1 '00 tnI' -(/)0(/)0 -(/)0 <1)0 (/)0 m-
O'IMool' .0
..-. . r-I .
<1)0 -(/)0 -(/)0 -
~
~
~
- Q
Ul ~
~
-
H
l> ~
H Ul
Q 8
:z4f1l
HS::
-0 0
fIl 00
f.ffll 00 ~ rz..
Cf.I~Q) ICC ~ ~ E-t E-t
:z40~ (!)Cf.1 00 0 lZi Z
0= f.f ;;,~ i = t!) fil ril
00 P. 0 0 0
00.... ::s...t ~g co t}E-t'H E-t H
~r-tOS:: r-I ZtIl Cf.IZ~ ~~~
cUf.fQ) .0 , H~~ ~~ ~
=t!)Cf.1 0'1 co 0'1
~ 'f&t .-. ~~ ~~I ~HPCf.l I 00
~ HUllZi Cf.It!)' :z4~'
0-- 0-. - o~o ril~~ Oril~
t!)cU,Q t!).<<J ,Q P-tcU .~ lZi ~ IJ Z~IJ
.
.
\D
.....
". j .-.,.., ",~" . ", '."-"."",r.
~. '.":.".,..... hj:",:,:,,'_i~.,,<:)
C i.~~/~-?".~.__._._..,.
<<""~ .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
~. f.)~.1(,.[.:::::t.~:~~'~.2,n. U?)\~n...
. ! '\ '''''' V ,_ _ ; j I
';: . :>h" ~--lJ1
.1 1.--_'\ "'<0, .... 1;( t:::~..'.'.l L:.<
- '.' '.G::)~'S
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item #:
92. O.2oS(J.-,j~)
Title:
Staff Update - Noise Ordinance
Issue: At the Board's direction, staff has been reviewing
alternatives which would enhance the enforcement of the County's
Noise Ordinance.
Background: Law enforcement personnel have had difficulty
obtaining convictions in court under our current noise ordinance.
Problems seem to be related to calibration issues of our existing
equipment, lack of enforceable standards, and perceived lack of due
process provisions. Staff attempted to draft amendments which would
give the responding officer broader discretion as to what was
"disturbing the peace" only to find that recent court cases require
little or no discretion to be used but rather very definitive
decibel readings at the property line.
Discussion: Calibration standards have been set for the County's
current equipment. Chief Miller intends to guide its use through
the development of departmental policies which should address some
of the court's concerns regarding due process. It is the intention
of the department to write a number of citations, where
appropriate, using the newly calibrated equipment to determine from
the courts what the parameters will be to obtain successful
convictions.
Staff Contact(s): Messrs. Tucker and Huff.
/dbm
92.037
:) 8ctird: /~ j 1-0/;1
f.Z::::L rl.). '1.1.0;)" J-' 'b I
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC ~
DATE: January 31, 1992
SUBJECT: Reading List for February 5, 1992
April 17, 1991 - pages 37 (#12) - end - Mrs. Humphris
June 5, 1991 - pages 1 - 15 (#7) - Mrs. Humphris
pages 15 (#7) - end - Mr. Perkins
July lO, 1991 - ~:~:: ~3 (~~) (~8~h~ ~\~L~a~~n~
August 14, 1991 - pago~ 1
pages 10
pages 21
pages 32
10 (~9) pqr. Bain ~
(#9) - 21 (#lld) - Mrs. Humphris
(#lld) - 31 - Mr. Bowerman
- end - Mr. Perkins
LEN:ec
DATE
", J 1 ~;J / ,f/:; " / I c; C,,/j '/
\'- Lle..- t..A_U.X... '-'9 If' J LX->
/
AGENDA ITEM NO. tj Q;;1, D :;{ () S, 8'3
/) tl.t~w0L/Vl;' yf-Uj-l~J-t 1:~71/: {!LLz5lIL ,.tb,: '11:12- ',TUtfpl J J! upJ
AGENDA ITEM NAME 11 4/.(. t ~fi\ 'L iJ.VeJ: L"6-lrr-lJidt.J -- Ii :I Y7tLlJ!..
!,rLzt /}.J! dti C- .
L1l7f&tc0 ,(~ ;11 d--
DEFERRED UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86
. ...
..., . q....;;..,,.,. ;_:~. \,;)
_ 1- -:J / ~,'(+: ."._~.~,_..~.".
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
COUNTYO~ALBEMARLE
"11 rr::::! r::."J IJ 0 n n r-;::t ~
.' 1....,i.J.._.I.Lr "''''I'''.L'''',' ..I.J..I'.'.'. l.~l ~
,"i ~
'-'; I~
,,/1 IAN Q 110(12
1\'\ V,"\, v.....,
i \ \ l'~';~>c" ",;-- ,,_-,<,,~'>L
1.1 l; L~-:J l~) L.:;; U ~
80,\;:;D OF SUPERV1SOqS;
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item I:
81J';011. 8 'f
Title: Millington Bridge
Issue: VDoT is requesting Albemarle County I s assistance in
obtaining release of easements held by the Virginia outdoor
Foundation (VOF) to allow VDoT to construct a new bridge.
Background: Millington Bridge is deteriorating and VDoT indicates
it cannot be repaired and does not meet acceptable alignment
criteria. To construct a new bridge, in a different location, has
resulted in an alignment called the "green line." This alignment
was developed as the least intrusive, but acceptable to VDoT. The
VOF holds easements but will not release them.
Albemarle County's position has always been to repair the bridge
and not build a new one but a compromise was necessary before VDoT
would accept our six-year secondary road plan. Board minutes and
the previous resolution reaffirming this is included in your
package.
Discussion and Reconunendation: VOF is unlikely to release the
easements but if the County specifically makes such a request, this
may occur. Providing bridge access is a necessity but repair is
still the preferred alternative. Until such time as repair is
determined to be technically infeasible, the County should continue
to support the repair alternative.
Staff Contact(s): Messrs. Tucker, Brandenburger, Cilimberg.
RWT,Jr/dbm
92.039
Attachment
~
.
.."",,
. ~
'7
\
Edward H Bain. Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David p, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
February 12, 1992
The Honorable John G. Milliken
Secretary of Transportation
607 9th Street Office Building
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Secretary Milliken:
This letter is in response to your letter of January 23, 1992, concerning
the Route 671 (Millington Bridge) project.
The Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on February 5, 1992, discussed
your suggestion that the Virginia Outdoors Foundation be contacted regarding the
easements it holds on certain properties in the alignment for this project.
However, the Board did not agree to make such a request to the Virginia Outdoors
Foundation.
The Board did take action to reaffirm its resolution of April 10, 1991,
concerning this bridge project. The same resolution was amended to request the
Virginia Department of Transportation to consider the Intermodal Surface Trans-
portation Efficiency Act of 1991, Section 1016(e), which the Board understands
allows states to construct bridges to reduced design standards. Attached is the
amended resolution.
I am hopeful that this matter can soon be resolved to the satisfaction of
everyone involved, and that the Route 671 bridge can be replaced in place for
all the reasons stated previously by the Board. A response to the Board's
resolution at your earliest convenience would be appreciated.
Very truly yours,
~ttU/ tP~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB:ec
Attachment
cc: Mr. Ray D. Pethtel
Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
'#
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors supports the repair of the bridge over
the Moorman's River on State Route 671 at Millington, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has not supported changing the alignments
at the approaches to this bridge as proposed by the Virginia Department of
Transportation because of the following:
1. its concern over the negative aesthetic impact on the Moorman's River
and its environs, the Moorman's being both a state and county scenic
river with land at Millington through which the so-called improvements
will pass having recently been covered by open space easements donated
to the Virginia Outdoors Foundation;
2. its concern over the negative impact upon land in actual agricultural
use in the Moorman's River Agricultural/Forestal District and the
negative impact upon adjoining properties;
3. its concern that such realignment and widening of the approaches as
proposed by the Virginia Department of Transportation will encourage
vehicular traffic to travel faster than is safe for State Route 671,
given the sharp curves and narrow pavement at either end of the pro-
posed improvement; and
4. its concern that the proposed improvements are inconsistent with the
character of State Route 671 and the surrounding environs; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors did evidence its concerns over these
impacts, and its belief that more critical secondary road safety improvements
existed in the County other than the realignment of the approaches to said
bridge, by unanimously voting to remove said bridge project from the Six Year
Secondary Road Improvement Budget in April 6, 1988, allocating such funds to
other secondary road safety improvements, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors was later notified that its entire Six
Year Budget had been rejected by the Virginia Department of Transportation as a
result of the Board's deletion of this project, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors appealed this action to the Commissioner
of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors, after the hearing of its appeal by the
Commissioner, reasonably believed its appeal would be denied and the improve-
ments constructed as originally proposed by the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation, and
WHEREAS, believing that such improvements were inevitable and would be
excessively damaging, the Board of Supervisors agreed to support an alternative
alignment to that originally proposed by the Virginia Department of Transporta-
tion, called the "Green Line" alignment, believing such alternative to be less
...
damaging than the project originally proposed by the Virginia Department of
Transportation, although the Board of Supervisors still prefers that no change
in the alignment of the bridge be constructed and that the bridge be replaced in
place, for all of the reasons hereinabove stated,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that it continues to prefer that no change in the alignment
and design of the approaches to said bridge be undertaken and that said bridge
be replaced in place for all of the reasons stated previously. However, if the
Virginia Department of Transportation continues to reject this alternative,
then the Board of Supervisors believes the "Green Line" alignment with a 30 mile
per hour design, 18 feet of pavement and shoulders and ditching to conform as
nearly as possible to the existing State Route 671, with aggregate treatment of
the bridge and parapet surfaces and an anodized bronze aluminum rail to be the
least damaging alternative.
FURTHER the Board understands that the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991, Section 1016(e), allows states to construct bridges to
reduced design standards;
NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of
Transportation to investigate this Act, determine if it is applicable to this
bridge project, and, if so, request the Federal Highway Administration to reduce
the standards of the design for this bridge.
-;'~ '}'(. * ,;I~ *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing consti-
tutes a true, correct copy of a resolution originally adopted by the Board of
County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a meeting held on
October 11, 1989; amended and readopted on April 10, 1991; and amended and
readopted on February 5, 1992. ~.
Clerk, Boar~unty Supervisors
lIli -~...
Ch.tinn.-1n of the Bo.\rd
('n,Jrli',> (~\Vh:ll'hnll.y.'
Vice- Ch,lirm.ln
j()r,n I 1 HI:'d",JiL III
S('(J"et.lry
jl';ln S_ Jho'ivn
Tr(,~lSU f('r
J-\\i. Ab('j Smith
Pres iJ e n l
Rubert T Dennis
Board of Directors
Albemarle County
& Charlottesville
James L Ballheim
Mrs. C. McChee Baxter
John I l. Birdsall, Ill'
Mrs. Robert Carter
Reuben Clark
Francis H. Fife
Reuben I Iitchcock
C. W. McNeely, III
Mrs. D. French Slaughter, HI
David van Roijen
Clarke County
Raymond H. Close
Joan K. Fine
Mrs. MaHhevv Mackay-Smith'"
Culpeper County
John Corradi
James R. Dyer
Zann Nelson Embrey
Mrs. J. L. Fray"
Fauquier County
J. W. Abel Smith.
Cynthia D. Beyer
John Coles
Bengt O. Farnstrom
Mrs. Paul Fout'"
Megan Gallagher
Peter F. S, Ohrstrom
Hope W. Porter
Charles S. Whitehouse'"
Greene County
Kendell S. Berry
Loudoun County
Jean S. Brown'"
Linda S. Cox
Bennett Davis
Judy Gerow
Will R. Hockersmith
G. A. Horkan,Jr.
Judith A. Meany
Jeanne L. Morency
Madison County
Robert Demarest
Neil T. Jones
Orange County
Mrs. A. N. Daniel
Mrs. John B. Jaske
James H.T. McConnell, Jr.
Frank A. Thomas, III
Rappahannock County
Susan C. Babcock-
Diane Bruce
Mrs. Thomas L. Eastham
Hunt Harris
Chairman Emeritus
B. Powell Harrison, Jr.
Directors Emeritus
Mrs. Demas T. Craw
Philip Irwin
George C. M<<:;hee
Mrs. James P. Mills
Mrs. James B. Murray
Joseph Prendergast
Duncan H. Read
Theodore G. Scott, Jr.
Sandra Speiden
Mrs. James L. Wiley
... ExecutIve Committee
i.~'~~\ ,\.~
":-'. . -j
..
'", \ '" \ " ;',
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
,.
~'_ 'l..<.. -.,'"
l'tO/CellIiS nit' IlIi'lI(l/lIu,'II/I-; 1,i'CI'l;/>ildy -; [)lI-;II/C-;,
February 3, 1992
~..;' ~~') r' :~\ ;
j': r~, i..f
r~1 ~:~
C::~-.l
"
.)
~--':. ~._~' !~; F' [~:: F: V: 3- 0 f.?S
Mr. David P. Bowerman
413 Berwick Court
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear David:
I recently read a letter written to you by Secretary
Milliken regarding the Millington Bridge project. This
rather remarkable letter asks the County to bring pressure
upon the Virginia Outdoors Foundation to release easements
which it holds in the area of the bridge and which prevent
the relocation of the approaches. These easements do not,
by the way, prevent repair or replacement of the bridge in
its existing location.
I read Secretary Milliken's letter as using the threat
of closing the road over Millington Bridge to strong arm
the Board of Supervisors into pressuring the Outdoors
Foundation to comply with the Department's request. I do
not know enough about the law of this matter to know what
the Department's options are, although it is law worth
knowing. However, the Department has recourse other than
closing the road: repair or replace the bridge where it
is.
Furthermore, it is not necessary for the Department to
pit the County against another state agency, the Outdoors
Foundation, in order to get its way with the Foundation.
Here again the Department has another recourse: it can
appeal to the Governor who has the authority to mediate
between the state's agencies, including VDOT and the
Outdoors Foundation. It seems to me that the Board should
not let itself be used as VDOT's tool in this case when it
is not necessary, and when doing so will upset easement
donors and send a negative signal to potential future
donors.
The Outdoors Foundation holds easements on nearly
10,000 acres of land in Albemarle County. The easement
program is entirely dependent upon the generosity of
landowners who have donated all of the easements held by
the Foundation. At current values, the state or county
28-C Main Street, Box 460, Warrenton, Virginia 22186/703-347-2334/Fax 349-9003
1010 Harris Street, Suite 1, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901/804-977-2033
..
Mr. David P. Bowerman
February 3, 1991
page 2
would have had to pay over $10,000,000 for the benefits which
these easements confer upon the public. In many states the only
way such easements can be obtained is by purchase.
This is an important program which very effectively advances
some of the most important goals of the Albemarle County
Comprehensive Plan and which provides other significant benefits
to Albemarle County. Neither the County of Albemarle nor the
Commonwealth could afford to purchase these benefits.
The Foundation accepts only those easements which are in
compliance with the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan, and which
do not, at the time of they are offered, conflict with any
officially adopted plans of other state agencies. I know of a
number of easements which were offered by landowners to the
Foundation and which the Foundation has rejected because they
conflicted at the time with officially adopted VDOT proposals. In
other words, the Foundation is very careful in accepting
easements. It does not accept easements for the purpose of
helping landowners frustrate public projects.
Landowners who voluntarily have given up all of the
development rights available on their land (as is the case with
the Millington easement donors) expect the Foundation to ensure
the continued conservation of that land. Furthennore, The Open
Space Land Act (Virginia Code section 10.1-1700) does not allow
the Foundation to release easements except when the Trustees of
the Foundation are able to make certain findings which are
specified in the Act.
In this case the Trustees have met and considered VDOT's
request that the Foundation release the Millington easements to
the extent required to allow a relocation of the bridge and
approaches. The Trustees decided, in the light of all of the
circumstances (including a comprehensive presentation by VOOT) ,
that they could not make the findings required by the Act in order
to release the easements.
The easement program in Central virginia is the most
effective and politically palatable way we have to conserve rural
land. If Albemarle County landowners see the County giving into
VDOT'S tactics and pressuring the OUtdoors Foundation to release
.
Mr. David P. Bowerman
February 3, 1991
Page 3
the Millington easements (and if the Foundation agrees to do so
when they have already voted not to do so) a significant new
disincentive to the donation of easements will be created. Please
reject the Department's request.
Sincerely,
/'""-/ - .
~
c. Timothy Lindstrom
Director, Charlottesville Office
Staff Attorney
CI'L/tlg
n:"Jribut"d tD
1.=1.1 -2~----
:';.,. --1i I /()/9 ,$11
John G. Milliken
Secretary of Transportation
COiJtJTV /'r'. II I n"'J
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI~J,n . ......... "i '"'~i;~;l
:' J
;TDDt:::=tiIW
'. t .. ,',,'
-- ,,".- I l~ l' .'\'5
Office of the Governor
Richmond 23219
~ '
January 23, 1992
The Honorable David P. Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Dear Mr. Bowerman:
This letter is in response to former Chairman F. R. Bowie's
letter to me of December 13, 1991, concerning the Route 671
(Millington Bridge) project. I understand that congratulations
are in order for your recent election as Chairman of the Board.
I look forward to working with you.
You are well aware that the Millington Bridge is
substandard, deteriorating, and needs replacement; your Board's
resolution of April 10, 1991, acknowledges this fact. The
Department of Transportation has completed the bridge's design,
along the "green line" which the Board of Supervisors selected,
and it stands ready to proceed with the project. However, the
Virginia outdoors Foundation, holder of Open-Space Easements on
certain properties in the alignment, has not agreed to convey a
portion of these easements so that the project can proceed.
Mr. Bowie's letter was correct that Secretary Haskell and I
have met to discuss this project. I believe it should proceed.
If the Board of Supervisors agrees, I suggest you contact
the Virginia Outdoors Foundation. The bridge continues to
deteriorate and it cannot be replaced within the existing right-
Of-way. Failure to replace it ma~require that it be closed to
traffic in the future. I re~ain hdpefuI that this matter will be
resolved very soon, so the/l;>ridge can be re~:i}aced promptly.
( SilC j rely, 1/
~\ t1 fi~v^J~
fj. n 't. ftlrl,lken ..,
JGM/mwc
cc: The Honorable Elizabeth H. Haskell
Mr. Ray D. Pethtel
- -
'"
RESOLUTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors supports the repair of the bridge
over the Moorman's River on State Route 671 at Millington, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has not supported changing the
alignments at the apprqaches to this bridge as proposed by the Virginia Depart-
ment of Transportation because of the following:
1. its concern over the negative aesthetic impact on the Moorman's River
and its environs, the Moorman's being both a state and county scenic
river with land at Millington through which the so-called improvements
will pass having recently been covered by open space easements
donated to the Virginia Outdoors Foundation;
2. its concern over the negative impact upon land in actual agricultural
use in the Moorman's River Agricultural/Forestal District and the
negative impact upon adjoining properties;
3. its conce.rn that such realignment and widening of the approaches as
proposed by the Virginia Department of Transportation will encourage
vehicular traffic to travel faster than is safe for State Route 671,
given the sharp curves and narrow pavement at either end of the
proposed improvement; and
4. its concern that the proposed improvements are inconsistent with the
character of State Route 671 and the surrounding environs; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors did evidence its concerns over these
impacts, and its belief that more critical secondary road safety impr.ovements
existed in the County other than the realignment of the approaches to said
bridge, by unanimously voting to remove said bridge project from the Six Year
Secondary Road Improvement Budget in April 6, 1988, allocating such funds to
other secondary road safety improvements, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors was later notified that its entire Six
Year Budget had been rejected by the Virginia Department of Transportation as
a result of the Board's deletion of this project, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors appealed this action to the Commission-
er of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors, after the hearing of its appeal by
the Commissioner, reasonably believed its appeal would be denied and the
improvements constructed as originally proposed by the Virginia Department of
Transportation, and
~
.
'"
- 2 -
WHEREAS, believing that such improvements were inevitable and would be
excessively damaging, the Board of Supervisors agreed to support an alterna-
tive alignment to that originally proposed by the Virginia Department of Trans-
portation, called the "Green Line" alignment, believing such alternative to be
less damaging than the project originally proposed by the Virginia Department
of Transportation, although the Board of Supervisors still prefers that no
change in the alignment of the bridge be constructed and that the bridge be
replaced in place, for all of the reasons hereinabove stated,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, that it continues to prefer that no change in the
alignment and design of the approaches to said bridge be undertaken and that
said bridge be replaced in place for all of the reasons stated previously.
However, if the Virginia Department of Transportation continues to reject this
alternative, then the Board of Supervisors believes the "Green Line" alignment
with a 30 mile per hour design, 18 feet of pavement and shoulders and ditching
to conform as nearly as possible to the existing State Route 671, with aggregate
treatment of the bridge and parapet surfaces and an anodized bronze aluminum
rail to be the least damaging alternative.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing con-
stitutes a true, correct copy of a resolution originally adopted by the Board
of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a meeting held on
October 11, 1989, and readopted on April 10, 1991, changing the word "repaired"
in the last two paragraphs to "rePla~>~ ___
Clerk, Board of' ounty Supervisors
~ ~ ~ v-e-~ r-:s (! ~
12-/t?f'~
~'1Juz.. t:lft/J/111u. {/,J,tJo:;; /01
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
FEBRUARY 1, 1992
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
/ROUTE I
INO. I
LOCATION
STATUS
EST.COMP I
DATE I
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
1660
I
I
I BRIDGE OVER S. FORK RIVANNA RIVER
I
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I 1
1250 / ST. CLAIR AVE. TO RTE. 64
I I
CONSTRUCTION 24% COMPLETE
SEP 93
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------~,
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
* REVISED DATE
** NEW PROJECT
_ 'r.
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86
'0-]-li/uu2,[ v{
()
[), I qq;L.
/
J"{Z/'ul
/7
Vl(CtLl &; I jCfCj:2
() /
. "
r
JOHN K. TAGGART, m
M, E. GIBSON, JR.
ThOMAS E,ALBRO
CHRISTINR ThOMSON
LAw Ol'l'lCES
TREMBLAY & SMITH
P Q. Box 1585
CHARLOTTESVILLE ,VIRGINIA 22902
105-109 EAsT HIGH STREET
TeLEPHONE(804)97~4455
FACSIMILE (804) 979-1221
~
@@lPW
BRUCE C. PHILLIPS
ROBERT J INGRAM,JR
GLEN M. ROBERTSON
CHERI A. LEWIS
PATRICIA D. MCGRAW
VIA HAND DELIVERY
OP COUNSEL
E. GERALD TREMBLAY
LLOYD T. SMITH, JR.
June 5, 1992
George R. st. John, Esquire
Albemarle County Attorney
st. John, Bowling & Lawrence
416 Park street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Re: Emerald Land Company/
Conveyance of 64.5-Acre Tract to Albemarle County
Dear Mr. Bowling:
Enclosed please find the Certificate of Partial satisfaction
apd recording receipt evidencing Crestar Bank's release of their
lien on the above referenced property. Also enclosed please find
the original Deed from Emerald Land Company to the County, which
has been signed by Ronald H.J. Langman, President of Emerald Land
Company.
As you may know, the county and my client have planned a
dedication celebration for this conveyance, which is currently
scheduled for next sunday, June 14th. If it all possible, I would
appreciate seeing the Deed recorded and the conveyance completed by
that time.
If there are any questions about this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
verJ truly yours,
~~4 '-
CAL/ka
Enclosures
31\brlands\stjltr
MEMBER, COMMONWEALTH LAw GROUP
THIS DEED made as of this
g,J.day of
May, 1992, by and
among EMERALD LAND COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, the
"Grantor", and the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, the
"Grantee". (NOTE: This Deed is exempt from taxation pursuant
to section 58.1-811(A) (3) and (C) (3) of the Code of Virqinia.)
WIT N E SSE T H :
That for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND
00/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), cash in hand paid, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, Emerald Land Company does hereby
I f-
W
I- w c(
0: >
~ f-
Ul Ul W
J: ...J
...J
~ !2 ;;:
>- J: Ul
f- W
<( f-
...J Ul f-
e( 0
m w ...J
~ OJ 0:
0 e(
W J:
0:: III U
I- 9
GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL, and CONVEY with GENERAL WARRANTY AND
ENGLISH COVENANTS OF TITLE unto the County of Albemarle,
virginia, the following described real estate:
All that certain parcel of land located in the
White Hall Magisterial District of Albemarle
County, Virginia, described as "Tax Map 39, Parcel
20, Residue of Emerald Ridge Subdivision, I 64.5
Ac." on a plat of S. L. Key, Incorporated, dated
April 22, 1992, which is attached hereto and
recorded herewith.
Being a portion of the property conveyed to
Emerald Land Company by Deed of Assumption of
Catherine J. Womack, Trustee of the Emerald Land
Trust, under a Trust Agreement dated November 4,
1985, said Deed being dated June 16, 1989 and
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of the County of Albemarle in Deed Book 1054, page
453.
This conveyance is made subject to all easements,
restrictions, reservations, and other matters contained in
duly recorded deeds, plats, and other instruments constituting
1
constructive notice in the chain of title which have not
expired by a time limitation therein contained or otherwise
become ineffective.
As evidenced by the signature of the Chairman of the
Board of Supervisors pursuant to a duly adopted resolution of
said Board, the County of Albemarle hereby accepts the
conveyance of the above-described property.
WITNESS the following signatures:
::c I-
W
f- w <
It >
~ I-
Ul LLi
Ul :r .J
.J
~ l? :;
>- :r Ul
I- w
c:( I-
..J Ul I-
oe( 0
m w .J
~ m It
W 0 oe(
:r
0:: to U
f- 0
EMERALD LAND COMPANY
B~~ ~~ (SEAL)
Ronald H. J. angman, Presldent
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
B
C
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, at large:
er':Ff/COUNTY OF Cl..\b..VY'\.0..r\.-E:..- , to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
a""'~ day of Juf"\....L.. , 1992, by Ronald H. J. Langman,
President, Emerald Land Company.
My commission expires: o\\~\~~
K CUJ./vv /Y7 u..<;)-<~/~~
Notary Public
2
COMMONWEALTH OF ~~PJNIA, at large:
CITY /COUNTY OF ~1,L/2lL}}a/L/e , to-wit:
. ~ The foregoi~g instrument was acknowledged before me this
if) day of .....AA. ,I..-L , 1992, by /.l;L. <--101 I:::> (.:~I"/(I /71 ,t -1
, Chairman, Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia.
My commission expires:~t~J
Z 7, Iff-!J
" "., ..'J
'11/0:/ !U {'<i'Uj.,.
Notary Public
i
v
:r: I-
lIJ
I- lIJ c(
a: >
~ l-
(/) l!l W
J: ..J
..J
~ ~ :;:
>- J: l!l
I- lIJ
c:( I-
-l l!l I-
0( 0
III lIJ ..J
~ Ol a:
W 0 0(
J:
0:: III U
I- 0
30\emridge.dd
3
I-I.J.~N I 3.J./!;O'*'iO:J
!l,
'"
~d
....n..
3 ~f
:Ii
~
n..
~
>-
.....
~
u
);
0,.
C\Jes s
~
IJ.. -.J -J ~ G
OW~(i) ~
'-' 0:: s: -
I- ~ ~ is f- >-'
<:( Q.. Lu ~ ~ f-
-.J ::, U) ~ ~
Q.. 0)- 9 Lu !:2 is
Lu~t3~QO
I- Q.. 0:: @ -J Lu
- .....-J-J
<f) <:( Lu Q <t 0::
O~~-J:I:<t
Q.. ~<tLu~
~ X ~e:i!::CQ
8 ~ ~~~~
o
o
<Xl
r'
C
g;
~ ~ ('-1
o '" _ .r
G ~;;r5~
~ ,)) ~ ~ ~' ~
V; , ..,.
~ ~2~~
=s -"
a
a
,
"
0')
a
0:0
0')
o
o
v
~.".'.~~
. . 0
. .~~
u
z
~
W
..J
<(
U
(/)
\
t.
N
(J'J
(J'J
cJ
N
..J
iE
Cl.
<(
W
~
C\ '.
o
8
'"
o
'i
~
~~
5~
~~
~'"
\U
'"
~ '"
~ '" ~d
'" ....-J I ....n..
_U :3 ~~ /
~d ....n..
....n.. / 3~f I ~ ~ ~....~~
3 ~f / :Ii / ~n!d~
~ ~ I
~~ I ~~~o'
/ oW'Oo
I UCl1ll'l"1
!t;<i::("i l-
I $ :>: I-'C ~~
. 41 ..00 ~/ ~~
~8 i" . .f'i?
~8 $<>: .09'6i?& s p
$<>:
CII
. F.\..
l",.~...
e~~~
~~~t
~~,.'S2
e:it\:!ot
"'~..]~
~ ~
~..,~.,
8 ~~
~
<>:
Cl
~
~
u~o
C~O...
-'0
-J"
....~o..
i!:ai~
:':"'q)
fu~cq
",1-'0
~
:.:
....
b-
08
o~
0",
~ ",-
q)
:.:
-
i:>
~
o Iii
t\i >
...J _
ILl C
~~o~u
q: Ulq:
Q..~ls.J1O
o\C~-i
r<)VjQID
Q.. ls.J Cl:: ..
q:Cl::c
~ ...J
)( ~
15 w
~
","-'
,!?,'f-
~~
",'9 't,'O ~
~~v")'\':>
a ~CJ U' <j ""Ii>
A ':J. ~ U' ~
~"'<j o. ~ Co'
o-:l t.")oPJ'O' ~
~ c; '" '9' <J; r\")'
~\ ~~'IJ~.'"
~.
. 10
P ~
~~~i~
u..,,. o!
~:.~~~
Il:g~~~
i~~!~
....
. ~
P>-Q~
Olll"'"-
~....!q c.
. :'l 0 0
~Q..J:~
~ "-"1
e:~g'"
::Jili~~
<f)~a::t\I
~.., .!?
8 0",
'" "'I ~
w5~ '" ~
~~Cl:: f ~
III I<. It u
....0Cl::~~ Q
5"'wu:>:0 :>:
n..~"-....,.", 5~
~g~~~8 Q ~
"'oWIll"'::50~ -':e
Cl::", "'''''
~~~~&f;1 i
u",~""o:(~ Wo
~S~~~ ~~
!!In..~,,,o ~Q
~~~3~:~ ~
~~ (\j
-[]
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
. ~ D~~l;"\ I al ~a~C~! F~l'l!i'"
ALbEMHKL1_L1~LDi!_~UUhl
D!:::.D xECE1~: i
DA ~E: 061 f)5/92 T I ~E. i 4: 13: 22 ACCOUNT: 00 ~::~":A.~.\L.i"...R,::-t9.:....2.!:.~,,){:)06 :-~,.8.,.,~_~!.'_,.,8...: '.", ,;,_,.,..,:~,F"I::-_,-.E,...C,;,~:", I P T: 92000(!{;'i043
~a~H' T~~. ~uM R~~' 'ftB0~ TVP;. ~!PI'C', . - --
L-,.lJ ......"1 ;'\11:. 1'-.... n ..Iv i"...."oJJ:, \.or
INSTRUMENT : 920006828 BOOK: 0 PAGE: 0 RECORDEJ: 06/05/92 AT 14:13
GRANTDR NAME ~ CRESTAR BANK EX; N ~GCHL!TY: CO
GRANTEE NAME: EnERALD LANE COMPANU EX: N PERCE~T: 100%
AND ADDRESS :
RECE!VED OF; TREMBLAY fr SMITH
CHECK: $10JH)
DESCRIPTIDN 1: RELEASING DEED BOOK 1054 PAtE 504
~
t:
CONSIDERATION:
CODE DESCRIPTION
301 DEEDS
i\i~\i: :,r "\r:::-,:
:...;'1; ~ Wi Joi,-,-...i.
UU / !..:'~: j Of)
.00
ASSUMPiION: .00
PAIr CODE DESCRIPTION
10,00
;~AP~
PAID
TE::mES:E:i 1 (;.00
AMOUNT PAID: 10.00
CHA~~;::,E p,M T .00
CLERK OF COURT: SHELBY J. MARSHALL
DC-18 (12191)
..
..
CERTIFICATE OF PARTIAL SATISFACTION
. .-
PLACE OF RECORD: ALBEMARLE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
DATE OF DEED OF TRUST: JUNE 26, 1989
DEED BOOK 1054, PAGE 504
NAME OF GRANTOR: EMERALD LAND COMPANY, a Virginia corporation
NAME OF TRUSTEES: ROBERT A. MOOREFIELD and ROBERT^ F. BROWNFIELD
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Certain tracts or parcels of land
in Albemarle County, Virginia on State Route 684, approximately 2-
1/2 miles northwest of Crozet, together containing 375 acres, more
or less
MAKER OF NOTE/BOND: EMERALD LAND COMPANY. a Virginia corp.
DATE OF NOTE/BOND: JUNE 26, 1989
FACE AMOUNT OF NOTE/BOND: $700,000.00
I/We. Crestar Bank, ho I der of the above ment i oned Bond/Note
secured by the above-ment loned Deed of Trust, do hereby cert i fy
that the I i en of the above-ment i oned deed of trust secured is
re I eased insofar as the same Is app I I cab I e to Tax Map 39. Parce I
20, Being the Residue Parcel of Emerald Ridge Subdivision, White
Hal I District.
Given under my hand this
t '-;<1 day of L
/
CRESTAR BANK
. 1992.
BY, /1/!::!:tf:
T I TLE/, Prv- ~ (:Y /1;1-.//<1 vjf-<..._
STATE OF VIRGINIAC(1)1~
CITY/COUNTY OF -------------- b
SubsY",llfed ~rw ~orn t)" Jjefore me th i s ~ ?a"v of , ,
1992, by If ()h.t/};t'1-f ./I10(i?e.-t/:f /rI~ . H?125I:&;;t:Cf;,.M1JJtJ:psul/l-fJ Tit Ie) .
My comrn I ss i on exp I res: r~: lqCj5
(;;ilx~~:!6
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Th i S cert I f I cate was presented
.1992, at
fee of $ has been paid.
and adrn i tted to record on
o'ciock a.rn./p.rn. Clerk's
Attest:
, C I e r k
By:
. Deputy Clerk
22/cps
.~
LAW OffICES
TREMBLAY & SMITH
JOHN K. TAGGART, m
M. E. GIBSON, JR.
ThOMAS E. ALBRO
CHRISTINE THOMSON
POBox 1585
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902
105-109 EAsT HIGH STREET
TELEPHONE(804)97~4455
FACSIMILE (804) 979-1221
BRUCE C. PHILLIPS
ROBERT J. INGRAM,JR
GLEN M. ROBERTSON
CHERI A. LEWIS
PATRICIA D. MCGRAW
February 24,
OF COUNSEL
E. GERALD TREMBLAY
1992.. LLOYD T. SMITH. JR.
COUr\~TY OF :\LEE~..~/\RL t
Gl'; r::::; (~::~.1 ~.. .'- ~
/111.p---:"'-- .
j.Li1i/
,. ('i... ... '"".:"'\ 0-' '''r')
1 :, \ \ ,...,...., Ii.:',.,:' :" '. ,'.-
L' \ ~ ~,..
. 1 I ~ ~ 1.-.....-,...-...
I Lj ~.~ l~.'~) '.
(,-,
, I'
~, I I'
\; Ii
1', 1 j;
) ; : i!
/ I; d
/ J f if
I. ;,
. - L.::J
Ms. Lettie Neher, Clerk
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
BOl,R D .of
"'.J '1-''''
~ ...'. ,-1,
:;:$
Re: Emerald Land Company/Deed to Albemarle County
Dear Ms. Neher:
Enclosed please find the executed Deed for the land which my
client, Emerald Land Company, will be donating to the County of
Albemarle. I would appreciate it if you would forward to me a copy
of the recording receipt issued by the Clerk's Office upon
recordation.
V(Z2t1~
Cheri A. Lewis
CAL/ka
Enclosure
31\brlands\nehltr
MEMBER, COMMONWf.ALTH LAw GROUP
I I-
IJ.I
I- IJ.I ~
a: >
~ I-
III W
(/) J: ...J
...J
~ C> >
>- J: III
I- IJ.I
<( I-
...J III I-
<( 0
m IJ.I ...J
~ en a:
0 <(
W J:
ll:: III U
I- 0
..
THIS DEED, made as of this ____ day of January, 1992, by
and among EMERALD LAND COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, the
"Grantor", and COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, the "Grantee."
(NOTE: This Deed is exempt from taxation pursuant to section
58.1-811(A) (3) and (C) (3) of the Code of Virqinia.)
WIT N E SSE T H :
That for and in consideration of the sum of FIVE HUNDRED
/
..
NINETY SIX DOLLARS AND 23/100 ($596.23), cash in hand paid,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Emerald Land
Company does hereby GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY with
GENERAL WARRANTY AND ENGLISH COVENANTS OF TITLE unto the
County of Albemarle, Virginia, the following described real
estate:
All that certain parcel of land located in the
White Hall Magisterial District of Albemarle
County, Virginia, more particularly shown and
described as "58.7881 Acres to Be Donated to County
of Albemarle, Virginia" on the plat which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Being a portion of the property conveyed to
Emerald Land Company by Deed of Assumption of
Ca.-cherine J. Ho:mack, Trustee or thf~ E:me:::-ald Lar.d
Trust under a Trust Agreement dated November 4,
1985, said Deed being dated June 16, 1989, and
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
for the County of Albemarle at Deed Book 1054, page
453.
This conveyance is made subject to all easements,
restrictions, reservations and other matters contained in duly
1
recorded deeds, plats and other instruments constituting
constructive notice in the chain of title which have not
expired by a time limitation therein contained or otherwise
become ineffective.
As evidenced by the signature of the Chairman of the
Board of Supervisors pursuant to a duly adopted resolution of
said Board, the County of Albemarle hereby accepts the
conveyance of the above-described property.
WITNESS the following signatures:
EMERALD LAND COMPANY
I I-
w
I- w <C
Q: >
~ I-
U) lJ) w ( SEAL)
J: ...J
...J
~ l!) :;: By: Ronald H.
>- J: lJ) Title: President
I- w
<( I-
....J lJ) I-
<( 0
m w ...J COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
~ m Q:
0 <( COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
w J:
0:: III U
I- 0
By~~fl&~p--- (SEAL)
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
2
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, at large:
eFfUi/COUNTY OF
~ \ ~~ Os \-L.-
, to-wit:
~ The forego~9vinstrument was acknowledged before me this
d. \ ~ day of Janu~ry;, 1992, by Ronald H. J. Langman, President
of Emerald Land Company.
My commission expires:
a \\\.Q \ C\1.,
__J(~__fY7~
Notary Public
I f-
W
~ W ~
0: >
~ f-
11l W
(/) :r ..J
..J
~ Cl :;
>- :r 11l
f- w
<( f-
..J 11l f-
<( 0
m w ..J
~ 01 0:
0 <(
W :r
Il:: 11l U
~ 0
COMMONWEALTH OF V7~~GINI~! at large:
epfUf-/COUNTY OF 1JJJJ1//la./uJ-- , to-wit:
/.~ The forego~~~instrument was acknowledged ?efore me this
IJl day of JAfl&~ 1992, by /)()t/ld.~ p, j3owV1JJ(u,. ,
Chairman of the County of Albemarle Board of Supervisors.
My commission expires: May :29, /913
~t(~~~~;tubliC
U
30\emridge.dd
3
Edward H. Bain. Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
February 11, 1992
Cheri A. Lewis
Tremblay & Smith Law Offices
P. O. Box 1585
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: Emerald Land Company/Deed to Albemarle County
Dear Ms. Lewis:
Enclosed please find the Deed for land donated to the County
of Albemarle, Virginia, approved by the Board of Supervisors at its
meeting February 5, 1992 and signed by the Chairman. Please have
Mr. Langman sign the deed and return same to the undersigned to
file with the Clerk of the Circuit Court.
LEN:bh
Enclosure
JOHN K. TAGGART, m:
M. E, GmSoN, JR,
ThOMAS E, ALBRo
CHRISTINE ThOMSON
LAW OffICES
TREMBLAY & SMITH
P o. Box 1585
CHARLOTIESVlLLE, VIRGINIA 22902
105-109 EAsT HIGH STREET
TELEPHONE (804) 977-4455
FACSIMILE (804) 979-1221
BRUCE C PHILLIPS
ROBERT J.INGRAM,JR.
GLEN M. ROBERTSON
CHERI A. LEWIS
PATRICIA D. MCGRAW
HAND DELIVERY
01' COUNSEL
E, GERALD TREMBLAY
LLOYD T. SMITH, JR.
February 4, 1992
George R. st. John, Esquire
Albemarle County Attorney
st. John, Bowling & Lawrence
416 Park street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Re: Emerald Land Company/Deed to Albemarle County
Dear Mr. st. John:
Enclosed please find the Deed I drafted and revised pursuant
to our telephone conversations of last week. It is my
understanding that the Board of Supervisors will meet to consider
this on Wednesday. If the Deed is agreeable to you, I would
appreciate your retaining it and obtaining the Chairman's signature
if the gift is accepted. If you see any further revisions that
need to be made, please do not hesitate to contact me.
CAL/ka
Enclosure
cc: Ronald H.J. Langman
31\brlands\stjoltr
MEMBER, COMMONWEALTH LAW GROUP
I I-
W
I- w ~
a: >
~ I-
\J} IJ) W
J: .J
.J
~ l.? >
>- J: IJ)
I- W
<{ I-
-I IJ) I-
<( 0
m w .J
~ ell a:
W 0 <(
J:
0:: iii u
I- 0
1.
'.
THIS DEED, made as of this ____ day of January, 1992, by
and among EMERALD LAND COMPANY, a virginia corporation, the
"Grantor", and COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, the "Grantee."
(NOTE: This Deed is exempt from taxation pursuant to Section
58.1-811(A) (3) and (C) (3) of the Code of virginia.)
WIT N E SSE T H :
That for and in consideration of the sum of FIVE HUNDRED
NINETY SIX DOLLARS AND 23/100 ($596.23), cash in hand paid,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Emerald Land
Company does hereby GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY with
GENERAL WARRANTY AND ENGLISH COVENANTS OF TITLE unto the
County of Albemarle, Virginia, the following described real
estate:
All that certain parcel of land located in the
White Hall Magisterial District of Albemarle
County, Virginia, more particularly shown and
described as "58.7881 Acres to Be Donated to County
of Albemarle, Virginia" on the plat which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Being a portion of the property conveyed to
Emerald Land Company by Deed of Assumption of
Catherine J. Womack, Trustee of the Emerald Land
Trust under a Trust Agreement dated November 4,
1985, said Deed being dated June 16, 1989, and
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
for the County of Albemarle at Deed Book 1054, page
453.
This conveyance is made subject to all easements,
restrictions, reservations and other matters contained in duly
1
~
recorded deeds, plats and other instruments constituting
constructive notice in the chain of title which have not
expired by a time limitation therein contained or otherwise
become ineffective.
As evidenced by the signature of the Chairman of the
Board of Supervisors pursuant to a duly adopted resolution of
said Board, the County of Albemarle hereby accepts the
conveyance of the above-described property.
WITNESS the following signatures:
EMERALD LAND COMPANY
I I-
W
I- w ~
a: >
~ I-
\J} IJ) w (SEAL)
J: .J
.J
~ l.? :; By: Ronald H. J. Langman
>- J: IJ) Title: President
I- w
<{ I-
-I IJ) I-
<( 0
m w .J COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
~ ell a:
W 0 <( COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
J:
0:: III U
I- 0
BY~~~~~ (SEAL)
Chairman, Board of supervisors
2
I I-
W
I- w ~
a: >
~ I-
IJ) W
\J} J: .J
.J
~ l.? :;
>- J: IJ)
I- W
<{ I-
-I IJ) I-
<( 0
m w .J
~ ell a:
W 0 <(
J:
0:: III U
I- 0
~
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, at large:
CITY/COUNTY OF
to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of January, 1992, by Ronald H. J. Langman, President
of Emerald Land Company.
My commission expires:
Notary Public
COMMONWEALTH OF YJJ;l;<GINI~! at large:
ePfUf-/COUNTY OF tJJiJt/rlCl/UC- , to-wit:
/,~ The forego~n~instrument was acknowledged ?efore me this
LfJ day of Jafl.f!J.~ 1992, by I}()(/ld~ p, j3cwVl~u;.
Chairman of the County of Albemarle Board of supervisors.
My commission expires: MlL) 029( /913
'/'>
, ')
) CtuUu
Notary ublic
30\emridge.dd
3
L.
C"_( ?/-c! ~
~-, ,\\-:.J_',;-;:~:;.5
C';~; ~~" ~ ~ ~.-:.t: '\PLE
/
.......:.::..: t~..~)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
~'
;,,~
; ~ ..."
.,,} ""
HViSOr1~
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item *:
tJ /. of! <I, f(P
Title:
Acceptance of Deed from Emerald Land Company to Albemarle
County for Land Adjacent to Mint Springs Park
Issue: State statute requires that the governing body "accept"
deeds for land acquired by the County.
Background: On April 20, 1988, Emerald Land Company offered to
donate approximately 56 acres of land to the County as an addition
to Mint Springs Park. This donation would serve as both a buffer
to the adjoining subdivision as well as watershed protection.
On August 14, 1991, the Board of Supervisors instructed the staff
to work out the details of the donation. Emerald Land Company had
requested that the 1991 real estate taxes on this property be
forgiven by the County as well as lifetime access to Mint Springs
Park granted for the Langman Family and the Roell Family.
Discussion: The 1991 tax bill on the property including penalty
and interest as of February, 1992 should become the "purchase
price" for the property as state law prohibits the County from
forgiving taxes. This amount is $592.63.
The Board had also requested that specific family members to be
given lifetime membership be listed and they are as follows:
The Langman Family:
Linda Langman
Ronald Langman
Willem Langman
Ina Langman
Juliet Langman
The Roell Family:
Katurah Roell
Elizabeth Roell
Isaiah Roell
Joshua Roell
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Acceptance of Deed from Emerald Land Company to Albemarle County
for Land Adjacent to Mint Springs Park
Page 2
Lastly, Emerald Land Company has requested that a press release
describing the donation be distributed in late June at an event to
be planned by Emerald Land Company. Details of this press release
will be developed at a later date.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board accept the deed
granting 58.788 acres to the County of Albemarle and authorize the
County Attorney and Board Chairman to execute the necessary
documents to close the transaction subject to the County Attorney's
review and approval.
Staff further recommends that an appropriation of $592.63 be
authorized, as attached, to be paid to Emerald Land Company for
payment of the 1991 real estate taxes on the above referenced
property with instructions that the money be used to satisfy the
tax liability before the deed is executed.
Lastly, staff recommends that the Langman and Roell family members
listed above be granted lifetime free access to Mint Springs Park.
Staff Contact(s): Messrs. Tucker and Huff.
jdbm
92.030
;
; r~\' ..f '}. ') /
-__",J
;.:-:;.; ::0. 1/, ()fI'-'f..:::t,J~1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
:". ;:: ~-~ fl-, PI ~ ", :, ,\: '\".
\ -,' " '--
'*. ~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
BE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
August 14, 1991
Land Donation - Parcel Adjacent to Mint Springs Park
Background: During the special permit approval granted to Emerald
Land Company on April 20, 1988 for Emerald Ridge Subdivision, the
developer offered to donate approximately 56 acres of land to the
County. This tract is adjacent to Mint Springs Park and would
provide both a buffer to the adjoining subdivision and watershed
protection.
This parcel of land is shown on the County's tax records as parcel
32-20 and contains 56.587 acres with a current assessment of
$73,600. This represents real estate taxes to the County of
$529.92 per year at the present rate. Although donation of the
land was not included as a specific condition of the special
permit, it was clearly offered during the discussion phase and
referenced throughout the staff's report.
Mr. Ronald Langman's letter of May 30, 1991 (attached) indicates
three conditions under which the property could be donated:
(I) Roll back on 1990 and 1991 taxes on the property. Tax records
indicate that $335.22 was paid on this tract in 1990 and $529.92
will be due for 1991. While state law prohibits the County from
forgiving taxes owed, a contract of purchase for the tax amount
would accomplish the same effect if it was the Board's desire to do
so.
(2) A mutually agreeable walking access be available to Emerald
Ridge residents leading to the Mint Springs gate house. Staff
perceives no problem with this from an operational standpoint.
(3) Lifelong family membership for the Roell and Langman families
as long as they own property at Emerald Ridge. Again, staff
perceives this as a policy issue and not an operational concern.
Mr. Ron Langman has indicated that he is willing to prepare the
deed of gift at his expense if the Board is willing to proceed. It
should be noted that the above listed conditions were not a part of
the discussion when the original offer to donate the land was made.
Recommendation: The Parks and Recreation Department has reviewed
the site and determined this to be an asset to Mint Springs Park.
Staff forsees no significant problems resulting from Mr. Langman's
offer and recommends your acceptance subject to your final
discussion and resolution.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Huff
or me.
RWT,Jr/dbm91.101
EMERALD LAND COMPANY
COUNTY OF ALBEMARU:.
May 30,1991
The Honorable Richard Bowie, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County Office Building
P.o. Box 1009
Charlottesville VA 22902
Dear Sirl
During the approval process of the Emerald Ridge Subdivision in
Albemarle County, it was discussed that a 56 acre parcel (as shown on
the attached plat) be donated to Albemarle County to be added to Mint
Springs Park. We have met and walked the property with Mr. Bob
Crickenberger and he has stated that he would be in support of this
gift.
This gift currently adjoins the Mint Springs property and there is a
path that connects directly to it. This property also over looks the
park and contains some of the headwaters in the lake. Since it is
primarily wooded, it should provide excellent hiking.
We hereby formally offer this property to the County of Albemarle under
the following conditionsl
1. Roll back on 1990 and 1991 taxes on the property.
2. A mutually agreeable walking access be available to Emerald
Ridge residents leading to the Mint Springs gate house.
3. Lifetime family membership for the Roell and Langman families as
long as they own property at Emerald Ridge.
If the Board of Supervisors feels that this gift will be in the best
interest of the County, please let us know and we will prepare the
formal gift deed.
~l~\
Ronald H.~
President
Katurah S. Roell
Vice President
Post o~ ~o~ Crickenberger
Charloncsville, :B~iaTlu"e r
(804) 823-2200
,~. .
...
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
April 25, 1988
Design Builder & Developers
P. O. Box 7000
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: SP-87-110 Design Builders
Dear Sir:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on
April 20, 1988, unanimously approved the above-noted request
to create 33 lots from a 375 acre parcel requesting
different configuration than by right development, zoned RA,
Rural Areas. Property, located on the west side of Rt. 684,
one-fourth mile north of Mint springs. Tax Map 39, Parcel
20. White Hall Magisterial District. Please note that this
approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. County Attorney and Watershed Management Official
approval of deed restrictions to include a) the
conservation buffer zone, b) the minimization of
earth-disturbance, including tree removal and c) the
location of building sites on those lots (#8-16)
proposed for no driveway stream crossings on Mad Run,
as described in the staff report presented at the Board
of Supervisors meeting, initialled by John T. P. Horne
and attached hereto;
2. Best Management Practices shall be utilized during
construction. The Watershed Management Official shall
review the Soil Erosion Plan;
3. Not more than two dwellings shall be constructed on the
higher elevations (Lots 17 and 25), the location of which
shall be specified on the final plat;
",'
/
~ " ',....
'~..
Design Builders & Developers
Page 2
April 25, 1988
@
The subdivision shall be limited to 31 lots, ten of
which are a minimum of 21 acres (six after donation of
acreage to Mint Springs Park), and shall be in general
accordance with the plan by Steven L. Key, Inc. dated
January 19, 1988;
5.
No further division of any lot;
6.
The developer will use the existing logging roads to
the extent feasible for access to the building sites on
lots 17 and 25.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
r ere1-r. ,~
- L-1-f<!-lUVtL<<-.-
J T. P. Horne
~tector of Planning & Community Development
JTPH/jcw
cc: Kathy Brittain
~
~"
-~'-
.~ ',~."
." ,...
. ..
"0 ~"
f
f 'I
h.
: , ! ';; ~
a ! f.:.
. i i I f iU11
,
.. .~~ I
..
:a ,ll
~
t: tiJ
z
u 1 '.
S
l:
0:-
r J
- I
III
.
>': ,
Wh
. ~ ~
... 2-
. -...
... u 0(
...... . = :
.......... > u
>. :
.J..
'''' oJ.
101' ='
" ;:
2 IU II:
lllo(
oJ...
- <
a: ..
c.. ~...
(,/) )0:
...~
L- 211:
r- ~:
2 011I
Yo
-
~.
:. :,""
o : ~.
, . .:~~
. :~ . : Cl
~z
..
CJ
..
..
OO[iJf ~'1D~4
. .
I. .
h
iI II!
. . I!I III
fit IIld
I
I
. .
. .
-
1..------
I
.,
"
".
.1,.
Edward H Bain. Jr.
SamuOi'I Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
July 9, 1991
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
Mr. Ronald H. J. Langman
President
Emerald Land Company
PO Box 7060
Charlottesville, VA 22906
Dear Mr. Langman:
Thank you for your very generous offer to donate 56 acres to
be added to Mint Springs Park. Since I don't believe we have
received a similar offer in the past, with conditions such as you
request, I am asking staff to research the matter and present it to
the Board at our August 14 meeting.
Again, thank you for your offer and should more information be
needed, the County Executive, Robert W. Tucker, Jr., or a member of
his staff, will be in touch with you.
Sincerely,
\/I! [kUJU
F. R. Bowie
Chairman
FRB:ec
EMERALD LAND COMPANY
COUNTY OF ALBEMARU.
The Honorable Richard Bowie, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County Office Building
P.O. Box 1009
Charlottesville VA 22902
May 30,1991
Dear Sirl
During the approval process of the Emerald Ridge Subdivision in
Albemarle County, it was discussed that a 56 acre parcel (as shown on
the attached plat) be donated to Albemarle County to be added to Mint
Springs Park. We have met and walked the property with Mr. Bob
Crickenberger and he has stated that he would be in support of this
gift.
This gift currently adjoins the Mint Springs property and there is a
path that connects directly to it. This property also over looks the
park and contains some of the headwaters in the lake. Since it is
primarily wooded, it should provide excellent hiking.
We hereby formally offer this property to the County of Albemarle under
the following conditionsl
1. Roll back on 1990 and 1991 taxes on the property.
2. A mutually agreeable walking access be available to Emerald
Ridge residents leading to the Mint Springs gate house.
3. Lifetime family membership for the Roell and Langman families as
long as they own property at Emerald Ridge.
If the Board of Supervisors feels that this gift will be in the best
interest of the County, please let us know and we will prepare the
formal gift deed.
~u\
Ronald H.~
President
Katurah S. Roell
Vice President
Post o~ ~o~ Crickenberger
Charlottesville, :B~iaT.u"e r
(804) 823-2200
-
-
-
---
---
-
--
0-
-Q.
o ---
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
T.M. 55 PAR.28
D.B. 300/354
:!:58.788I ACRES TO BE DONA TED TO .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
ROBERT P. BUFORD
~~---
,__7,,?(...~.1~T ....~. _h<<',.~"""Jr__."',~,,,,,-,,,,-,,<~~-~,"'~.l!'...j,!b- .<'iJ$'__\"_~}tT_:".:"",;,:~~~t_~~'~~:";'~~'::l:'',.'~~'--;' ;,:"-,,,.~-~,,':_~'_':"::-_;'~~"""'j.i"'.'~,':.~<"'Y1<,'~}(J
~"
..
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
Fe (l C; J 11{1?
q II { l (~, s 7
CI ."
. UI/Gf\ 1l.&tt/u.S
ftr'" I
, ~~ fV) L.L. - 0 ~f e l1iJ:if<j ~ t. ']
f .
Form. 3
7/25/86
Edward H Bain, Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouell
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
MEMO TO: Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
DATE: February 11, 1992
SUBJECT: Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 8, Finance and
Taxation of the Code of Albemarle and Chapter 12, Motor
Vehicles and Traffic of the Code of Albemarle.
Attached is a copy for the above noted Ordinance changes approved
by the Board of Supervisors, at its February 5, 1992, meeting.
LEN:bh
cc: James L. Camblos, III
Commonwealth's Attorney
, w
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 8, FINANCE AND TAXATION
OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation, of the Code
of Albemarle is hereby amended and reenacted in certain sections to
read as follows:
Article I. In General.
Sec. 8-1. Exemption of certain personal property from taxation.
Repealed Sec. 8-1 and moved the wording to be new Sec. 8-67.
Sec. 8-1.1. Biennial assessment of real estate.
Repealed Sec. 8-1.1 and moved the wording to be new Sec. 8-64.
Sec. 8-1.1. Erroneous Assessments.
(a) The director of finance of the county, after diligent
investigation and upon being satisfied that he has erroneously
assessed a taxpayer with any local levies shall, if the levies have
not been paid, exonerate the taxpayer from payment of so much thereof
as is erroneous, and if such levies have been paid, shall refund to
the taxpayer the amount erroneously paid together with any penalties
and interest paid thereon.
(b) When the director of finance who made the erroneous
assessment has been succeeded by another person, such person shall
have the same authority as the director making the original errone-
ous assessment; provided, that he makes diligent investigation to
determine that the original assessment was erroneously made and
certifies thereto to his local governing body.
(c) Any application by an aggrieved taxpayer for correction of
a tax assessment must be made within five years from the last day of
the tax year for which such assessment is made.
(d) Reports itemizing such refunds shall be made to the board
of supervisors on a quarterly basis. (11-3-76; 4-13-88; Sec.
8-1.2, Ord. of 2-14-90.)
Sec. 8-1.2. Penalty for returned checks.
(a) If any check tendered for any tax due under this chapter is
not paid by the bank on which it is drawn, the taxpayer for whom such
check was tendered shall remain liable for the payment of the tax the
same as if such check had not been tendered.
r ~
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 2.
, (b) If such person fails to pay the amount shown on the face
of the check within five days after notice of such nonpayment has
been mailed by certified or registered mail to the taxpayer by the
director of finance, a penalty of twenty-five dollars ($25.00)
shall be added to the tax due. Such penalty shall be in addition
to any and all other penalties provided by law. (11-3-76; Sec.
8-1.3, 4-13-88.)
Sec. 8-1.3. Penalty; interest; date and manner of payment.
(a) Taxes due and owing to the county for real estate shall be
due and payable in one installment on or before the fifth day of
December of the year such taxes are assessed.
(b) Taxes due and owing to the county for tangible personal
property, machinery and tools, mobile homes and public service
corporations shall be due and payable in two (2) installments on or
before the fifth day of June and the fifth day of December of the
year such taxes are assessed.
(c) Supplemental tax assessments for real estate, tangible
personal property, machinery and tools, mobile homes and public
service corporations shall be due and payable within thirty (30)
days of the billing date.
(d) A penalty equal to ten (10) percent of the amount past
due shall apply on all taxes remaining unpaid after the due'date.
(e) Interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum shall
apply on all taxes and penalties commencing the first day of the
month following the month in which such taxes are due and continuing
until paid.
(f) The prov~s~ons herein are in no way intended to alter any
other provisions of state law or county ordinance, the subject of
which is not specifically addressed herein. (8-10-77; 10-8-80;
Sec. 8-1.4, Ord. of 2-14-90)
Sec. 8-1.4. Use of credit card in payment of taxes.
The director of finance is authorized to accept payments of local
taxes by use of a credit card. In addition to any penalties and
interest, the director of finance shall add to such payment a sum not
to exceed four (4) per centum of the amount of the tax, penalty and
interest paid, as a service charge for the acceptance of such card.
Such service charge shall not exceed the percentage charged to the
county by the credit card company. (Sec. 8-1.5, 10-2-85)
Sec. 8-1.6. Assessment of new buildings substantially completed.
Repealed 8-1.6 and moved wording to be new Sec. 8-65.
r ~
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 3.
Sec. 8-1.7. Time limits for appeals of real estate assessments.
Repealed 8-1.7 and moved wording to be new Sec. 8-66.
Sec. 8-1.8. Tax Valuation, etc., date for tangible personal
property, machinery and tools.
,
Repealed 8-1.8 and moved the wording to be new Sec. 8-68.
Sec. 8-1.9. Proration of Tangible Personal Property.
Repealed 8-1.9 and moved the wording to be new Sec. 8-69.
* * * * *
Article XIII. Real Estate - In General.
Sec. 8-64. Biennial assessment of real estate.
(a) All real estate in the county shall be assessed biennially
for purposes of taxation by the director of finance of the county as
of January 1 of each odd year, and all taxes for each even year on
such real estate shall be extended on the basis of the last
assessment made prior to such year.
(b) The office of real estate assessments of the county has
conducted a new reassessment of all real property to be applicable on
real estate for the tax year beginning January 1, 1977, and shall
conduct a new reassessment of all real property biennially to be
applicable for the tax year beginning January 1 of every odd tax year
thereafter. The office of real estate assessment may complete such
reassessment during an entire two year period, employing the same
standards of value for all appraisals made during such period.
(c) Beginning with assessment effective on January 1, 1977,
all assessments of real estate in the coun~shall be made at one
hundred (100) percentum fair market value. (Sec. 8-1.1, 11-3-76.)
Sec. 8-65. Assessment of new buildings substantially completed.
Every new building substantially completed or fit for use,
occupancy and enjoyment prior to November 1 of the year of completion
shall be assessed when so completed or fit for use and occupancy, and
the director of finance shall enter in the books the fair market
value of such building. No partial assessment as provided herein
shall become effective until information as to the date and amount of
such assessment is recorded in the office of the director of finance
and made ava~lable for public inspection. The total tax on any such
new building for that year shall be the sum of (i) the tax upon the
assessment of the completed building, computed according to the
ratio which the portion of the year such building is substantially
.' t.
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 4.
completed or fit for use and occupancy bears to the entire year,
and (ii) the tax upon the assessment of such building as it existed
on January 1 of that assessment year, computed according to the
ratio which the portion of the year such building was not
substantially complete or fit for use and occupancy bears to the
entire year. With respect to any assessment under this section
after September 1 of any year, the penalty for nonpaYment by
December 5 shall be extended to February 5 of the succeeding year.
(Sec. 8-1.6, 9-9-87)
Sec. 8-66. Time limits for appeals of real estate assessments.
Pursuant to the provisions of section 58.1-3330 of the Code of
Virginia, all applications for appeal from any assessment of real
estate must be made by the property owner or lessee within ninety
(90) days from the notice date of the real estate assessment
change. In accordance with section 58.1-3378 of the Code of
Virginia, any additional appeal must be made to the board of
equalization wi.thin thirty days. Appeals on pro rata assessment
where new construction becomes substantially complete between
January 1 and October 31 'are not affected by the March 31 or April
30 deadlines. (Sec. 8-1.7, 7-12-89)
Article XIV. Personal Property - In General
Sec. 8-67 Exemption of certain personal property from taxation.
The following household and personal effects are hereby exempted
from taxation:
(a) Bicycles.
(b) Household and kitchen furniture, including gold and silver
plates, plated ware, watches and clocks, sewing machines,
refrigerators, automatic refrigerating machinery of any type, vacuum
cleaners and all other household machinery, books, firearms and
weapons of all kinds.
(c) Pianos, organs, phonographs and record players and records
to be used therewith and all other musical instruments of whatever
kind and all radio and television instruments and equipment.
(d) Oil paintings, pictures, statuary, curios, articles of virtu
and works of art.
(e) Diamonds, cameos or other precious stones and all precious
metals used as ornaments or jewelry.
(f) Sporting and photographic equipment.
{g) Clothing and objects of apparel.
~
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 5.
(h) All other tangible personal property used by an
individual or a family or household incident to maintaining an
abode.
The classification set forth above shall apply only to such
property owned and used by an individual or by a family or household
incident to maintaining an abode. (Sec. 9-1, Code 1967; Sec. 8-1,
Code 1988)
Sec. 8-68. Tax valuation, etc., date for tangible personal property,
machinery and tools.
~Jl,Tangible Personal Property, except as provided under section
8~~, shall be taxed as of January first of each year. The status
of all persons, firms, corporations and other taxpayers liable to
taxation on any such property shall be fixed as of such date in
each year and the value of such property shall be taken as of such
date.
The director of finance shall not make an assessment under the
provisions of this section if the assessment would result in the
issuance of a tax bill in an amount less than five dollars ($5.00).
(Sec. 8-1.8, Ord. of 2-14-90)
State law reference-Similar provisions, Code of Va., Secs.
58.1-3515, 58.1-3912.
Sec. 8-69. Proration of tangible personal property.
(a) The tangible personal property tax shall be levied upon
motor vehicles which acquire a situs within the County after
January first of any tax year for the remaining portion of the tax
year; such tax shall be prorated on a monthly basis.
(b) When any motor vehicle loses its situs in the County or
changes ownership after January first of the tax year any tax
assessed on such vehicle shall be relieved, or refunded if paid.
Such relief or refund shall be prorated on a monthly basis.
(c) Whenever a motor vehicle with a situs in the County is
transferred to a new owner within the County, the new owner shall be
subject to taxation on a prorated basis for the remaining portion of
the tax year. The previous owner shall be eligible for relief or
refund as provided by paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) For the purposes of this section a period of more than
one-half (1/2)of a month shall be counted as a full month and a
period of less than one-half (1/2) of a month shall not be counted.
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 6.
(e) The director of finance may apply any refunds under this
section to any delinquent accounts owed by the taxpayer. In
addition, this refund may be applied as a credit toward the tax due
on a newly acquired motor vehicle.
(f) Each taxpayer owning tangible personal property with a
situs within the County shall file a return on forms prescribed by
the director of finance on or before January 31 of each year or
within thirty (30) days of the date of purchase or the establish-
ment of a situs within the County.
(g) Tangible personal property, which was legally assessed by
another jurisdiction in the Commonwealth and on which the tax has
been paid, are exempt from taxation under this section for the
portion of the year such property was legally assessable by another
jurisdiction in the Commonwealth. (Sec. 8-1.9, Ord. of 2-14-90)
State law reference-Similar provisions, Code of Va., Sec.
58.1-3516.
Sec. 8-70. Volunteer rescue squad and fire company workers.
(a) Items of property owned by members of a volunteer
rescue squad or fire company which meet the criteria set forth in
this section shall constitute a class of property separate from
other classifications of tangible personal property.
(b) Qualified property is limited to one motor vehicle as
defined in Code of Virginia Section 46.2-100 owned and registered
or partially owned and registered with the Virginia Department of
Motor Vehicles by the qualifying volunteer rescue squad or fire
company member. Qualification may not be transferred from one
vehicle to another during a six month billing cycle as long as the
original vehicle reported remains in the volunteer's ownership.
(c) The motor vehicle must be regularly used by the qualify-
ing volunteer rescue squad or fire company member to respond to
calls.
(d) The qualifying volunteer must have completed minimum
training requirements and one hundred (100) hours of volunteer
activities during the preceding twelve (12) months. Eligible
volunteer hours are limited to hours attending squad/company
meetings, training sessions or actual responses to calls~
(e) Qualifying volunteers must meet the minimum requirements
and be an active member of the squad/company as of June 1 or
December 1 to be eligible for the next six (6) month billing cycle
beginning the following July 1 or January 1. The chief or captain
An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact
Chapter 8
Page 7.
of each squad/company shall provide by June 15 and December 15 a
certified list of all members who have met the eligibility crite-
ria. Volunteers will not be eligible for a refund on any tax paid
or assessed prior to meeting the eligibility criteria and being
included on the appropriate listing.
(f) The tax rate for the first four thousand five hundred
dollars ($4,500.00) of assessed value shall be set at $0.00 and the
balance of the assessed value shall be set at the general personal
property tax rate. (2-5-92)
Code of Va., Sec. 58.1-3506.
FURTHER ORDAINED that in all other respects Chapter 8, Finance
and Taxation, of the Code of Albemarle remains the same;
AND FURTHER ORDAINED that this ordinance is effective with the
1991 license year.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted
by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
regular meeting held on February ~92. ~ ~~~ .
~ of fo;;'r~~ors
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic,
Article V, County Vehicle Licenses, Section 12-23 is hereby amended
and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 12-23. Same--Volunteer Fire Company and Rescue Squad Members.
Any person listed on the active rolls of any volunteer fire
company or rescue squad who qualifies under section 8-70 of this
Code shall be exempt from the license fee provisions of this
article as to anyone vehicle registered to such person.
(11-15-73; Ord. of 2-14-90)
State law reference-Code of Va., Sec. 46.2-752.
FURTHER ORDAINED that in all other respects Chapter 12, Motor
Vehicles and Traffic, of the Code of Albemarle remains the same;
AND FURTHER ORDAINED that this ordinance is effective with the
1991 license year.
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted
by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a
regular meeting held on February 5~.~
~~rd 0 ounty Supervlsors
DIC''''R'''''''''
l..;.Jl \l;;';"~;,;' 'j 'T' ", -'.--.-\ --D It.....-~..,,-....S
...... . '.~- ........'--,..:. In;';;ifh':'~''\
ON / - -J / - 'i.,2.../
, jl,t,.=;..t;:;~..",-:';:c.::;;:;;;t;;::;m,~,.~,.....
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
n(\ ,}AN 301992
I'
I U I C.TtJ~"'l~L-.iJ'TIi'
--~ ~ -J LJ LJ L.~
BOAf.?D OF SUPERVISO~S
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item I:
q IJ. (}?,,! I. fJ Y
Title: Public Hearing: Finance Chapter, Albemarle County Code
Issue: State statute requires a public hearing prior to adoption of
additions to or amendments of the Albemarle County Code.
,.r.f
Background:
renumbered.
new sections
U\..-
As housekeeping items, Section 8. l- 8. I. 9 are proposed to be
Sections 8:-A~through 8-JH:" and Sections 8-~ through 8::8A/are
which relocate previously adopted sections ../ /
t
Section 8-85 establishes, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of
Supervisors in June, 1990, a section to provide a personal property tax
exemption for volunteer fire and rescue personnel. Section 12-23 is proposed
to be amended to use the requirements listed in Section 8~&~"for issuance of
a fire county decal for this same group of volunteers.
Discussion: Members of Jefferson Country Fire and Rescue Association have
indicated that they desire the interpretation of the ordinance to be
broadened to include officers and board members of their organizations who
donate substantial time as well as members of their ladies' auxiliaries which
often provide food and fund-raising services for the responders. The
County's intent of the present policy is to grant the exemptions only for
volunteer responders.
Recommendations: Staff recommends that the ordinances be adopted as
advertised. Staff further recommends that the Board clearly state their
intentions as to who is to receive the exemptions given that some departments
state that their ladies auxiliary member receive a different kind of training
and do donate over 100 hours just as the responders do.
Staff Contact(s): Messrs. Tucker and Huff.
jdbm
92.034
Attachment
-~k; e (,p/i \/'C..( ;,) I S J c,:> /~L ~
~VJe.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 8-85
:;/..'C. H ,.. EJ 7j .
Volunteer r~e:.:,cue Squad and F'\re Corl'lt)anv t'lernbf.,~r'~'..
a. Items of property owned by members of a volunteer
rescue squad or fire company which meet the criteria
set forth in this section shall constitute a class
of property separate from other classificationsof
tangible personal property.
b. Qualified property is limited to one motor vehicle
as defined in Code of Virginia Section 46,2-100
owned and registered or partially owned and
registered with the Virginia Department of Motor
Vehicles by the qualifying volunteer rescue squad or
fire company member. Qualification may not be
transferred from one vehicle to another during a six
month billing cycle as long as the original vehicle
reported remains in the volunteer's ownership.
r The motor vehicle must be regularly used by the
qualifying volunteer rescue squad or fire company
rnernbelr to Ire5pond to cd'I15 .QL to perform companv
business.
d. 'The qUi3'lifying UoIUI'ltt,:'el" rnu:::,t 1'ldUt:' ~ ~ minimum
reQuirements for their position ~ithin their
respect 1 ue rescue squad .QL fire companv. and rnust
have completed 100 hours of volunteer activities
during the preceding 12 month5. Eligible volunteer
hours are limited to hours attending squad/company
meetings, training sessions, actual responses to
cdll~:;, .t!!.!:!.!1 raisinQ..QL other companv business.
e. Qualifying volunteer5 must meet the minimum
requirements and be an active member of the
5quad/company as of June 1 or December 1 to be
eligible for the next six month billtng cycle
beginning the following July 1 or January 1. The
Chief or Captain of each squad/company shall provide
by June 15 and December 15 a certified list of all
members who have met the eligiblity criterta.
Volunteers will not be eligible for a refund on dny
tdX paid or assessed prior to meeting the eligibility
criteria and being included on the appropriate
li=.tinq.
f. The tax rate for the first $4,500 of ase5sed value
5hall be set at $0.00 and the balance of the asessed
value shall be set at the general personal property
ti:jX r i3te ,
~ .
-: \)"
VI ~~\-~
<:0 <;y~
O~ ~\J ~\\O'\.'(\Q,'l
~'\~ '(\\'l :\
CO\)\"' ~ CO\). S\'\.Q,Q,\ ~~C)\)
rJ.\CQ, 0 <) 'O~ ' ",\'0
0\\ ~\6 ~ ~\'\<?}\' 'J't>
~*,Q" ()~h1\
:<"\12,':> ,,-)
C'r-'O,\\O ,:\>0'(\12,
'\ Q,\Q,'Q
oy..~
:,i.J -(
GS ~, '\O~~\,
G~~O~ ,,,{\'-{ ~'\
COv
\-~ '3 ~
~)I
.'\-o.-d
o -o.'{\v
G \~
O~\.-\~ ~,'t."
~~ '0 :\\0"-"
~\:-s \'" 0"'''''' ~
Jp' 0"''' CO
Q't.?
0"" .
",..,.C...e~ ' ~,,~S9b
~~. e ~~9V).-
~.o"<>e~ ..,.",\" I> . ~ 1
~~. d ~;f.e.\e ,/-0" ..\iOg\"" t'ete ji>!\,;i>"C:I 1
co""" ~c 1."",,, ,,\'\.'\. e , . i\. ter {or on .. 'et e t
~\) '\. 0'" ",e" ell-On {r 0\\\ \\Ie
c'pl>~ '\. ",'ne" 0 P l. rl> n . S ions' ·
1>0"<> ' ,,0 . '\. S 0" e" '" " "\ 'ete "e oae pr"'"
1Je"~ 1. ",e'" . ~ e""". e '" ",0 . t c
~o.a. t.1-'(\:g ,,-'\}.'o")e ,.,..':i\ l' 0....' because 1
1'>ge" I> ",ee ~~e' ,i" ~~ >> ty
~ 1>0"~ e~"o"" "",,,,,I> of to:;e propos.d coun
'\. 99 . '\.1." ~'i 'I' . e ""I>e ~ Col>e
"..,.~" "..,."", S"'i>",e
1>0 ,,0'" ",'ne .
1. e\",'ne~ ",0 ,,,/lIIts 0 not inclUde i>,;1C
~ et e~(\1\'e""''' . ",'1 col>e i> ,,'fIue!:.l. on to mei> n, ca
"",en ",'ne co""': ; "", e ~ r e . '\l pe:sons l.f l. t Vli>n t"
1....1 ).-".. ~ a.\l~1-
C'\. e"~ "~et o~e, . nC'I."U-'
. t.~e . GO;::€> 1- n~ .
e~"o"'" s..,."e!"" . tOr .1on of t'etese metnbe'
'I' >~a ot rll.s'I.""",n ,011 46 ').-752 which ~
llOV . rl '\. e~ · oo.e ,..' ·
n"" '\. ).,,~ . S ",,, '" e' co' tUn 12 - 22
~~e e c"'\.s. ).", ;n co,,"'i .
ae t.ev. "..
co"""'l'i \",,,'\.e,,,e" ' s '\.' '" \.' ex.\\\"t ion from p
"Ve" "<>'\.I."g '\.eg:o" ,,>1\" a COpy of "hi'
or'ne e"" .s sec"').
'C. a. )f. )..
~O'l'er~ Ii'
'I' '\.os\."g. 'n\." '\.e, s 1ntended to
e"c ~ \." \. 0" . '" ot t \.~e s ~nd rescue Sql
",'1 o. ettii'er" rl" ra1sin
1." rl"'\.,,r '" ,,'no e"~ es g, or ass
. "e re~ eo'l''\.e """ etc I
"c"'). '''''nose'' . cot t ee pde t h' s "P
"ot. ",0 ~r\."g )."g '\. "" g"" jo . e s e peop 1
'D'i v ~ ",'ne 0"" 1ng th'
tireS ",re"'c>> ",'Der C ,j:tio 1S, but
co" '\. a :"" a '" 'D" '" ~"", e"aea 'D rv i sn; r sAt any ra
""ae r" ",'pl> '" vi"" ",'D" '" ",'De 1> a s d can res t
'De'\. \.e"e '\. 'i c'\. e"r . "e ",e"''D' on e in the
"",,0). "",? ",0 "c t. ). vi\. s'De" .
e)f.e1\\'Q'C. )..0-0. it i'C. eO
o;::ai-o.a.-o.ce.
"-.
"
Page 2
January 23, 1992
,'-1_' .1.1"_
."~,'
I am sending a copy of this letter to Melvin Breeden for his
information.
GRStJ/tlh
EnclOsures
cc: Mr. Melvin A. Breeden
SincerelY yours,
~k
Georg~t. John
county Attorney
~.:
Albema~le COunty Boa~d
of SUpe.t"visors
RObert W. TUcker
, J~., COunty ExeCUtive
'~cember 30, 1991
~~:eViSions to !>e~sonal !>~o
Pe~ty and /lfoto~ Vehicle
Distributed to Ilo.'d: ~
COlllVTy OF ALBE~E Agenda Item lio, ~3
F.OnUTY Or,4LBEM4RI.8
~;~:i !~:::[?J _rE=../,,'.~L_nQ:: illt
Ik~. 1(. '.' JAN 0 7. 1992) /U'"
Jill. /1It!
J lJ [.~~~;.U:T.~-:J lJ:!)
iOARD Of SUP,ERV1SOR.S
""0:
MEMORANDUM
'F F'
. ~nance has been w k'
"ill Cla~ify and o~ lng On dlnendments
i taXation PO~ti OpefUlly simplify
'. 8 -1-8 .1. 9 a~e on of the COde.
>ication and c:ec?mmended to be
q-79 th~ough ~SlS~ency Within
"-:ion 8-84 ect~on 8-81 and
'1:'tic1e I are new Sections
1- . There are no
opoSed sections.
'i~y the ~es01Ution
'ves to enCOurage
1-gency service
'fies the
'1nnel.
:he
.l.n a
.esCUe
and staff
,.oruary 5 th
.12ges.
,.
cour.~TY OF PlLEjE.r\i~/.U~~,LE
~:;;
~;
JAN 27 Fi'c)?
\
':CJ . >.
i ' :,'
.~.".. -,. ~.."
.',ri...#
E)~EC:U "1 :~iE ~~~;Fr!':E
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney
416 Park Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Telephone 296-7138
JAMES M, BOWLING, IV
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
January 23, 1992
GEORGE R, ST,JOHN
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Dear Bob:
Agenda Item No.15 on the action letter for the January 16,
1992 Board meeting requests an opinion from me on whether
auxiliary persons are subject to "these Code provisions".
I do not quite understand this question, because it could
refer either to the State Code, or to the proposed County Code
amendments.
Clearly, the County Code amendments do not include auxiliary
persons; therefore, I interpret the question to mean, can the
Board of Supervisors include auxiliary persons if it wants to?
The enabling legislation for exemption of these members from
county decals, is State Code Section 46.2-752, which we have
already implemented in County Code Section 12-22.
The enabling legislation for exemption from personal
property tax is Section 58.1-3506, a copy of which I am
enclosing.
In my opinion, this legislation is intended to refer to
active, regular members of fire companies and rescue squads, and
not to those people who engage in fund raising, or assisting at
f ires by bringing coffee and sandwiches, etc. I suppose you
could stretch the language to include these people, and I
understand that other counties are doing this, but I don't
believe that was intended by the legislation. At any rate, it is
absolutely clear that the Board of Supervisors can restrict this
exemption to active members, as it has done in the proposed
ordinance, if it so wishes.
I
Page 2
January 23, 1992
I am sending a copy of this letter to Melvin Breeden for his
information.
Sincerely yours,
~Je
Georg~t. John
County Attorney
GRStJ/tlh
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Melvin A. Breeden
1
tl1str;',uter to r.oarci: / # J 0 .11:::
Agenda Itm t-I'J. _:1f::.;,Q2~!'.:...,:i5
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
tanH'." Of" A.lBDftM;LS ~
__. ~ r--' "n, " 1-=:1 ~n
r=:l. ... J 2:'...1 f:..-:'..'.,l',.-,~.. "\ i \~'
I . "\
i cj l I AN 0 7 1992 \!
'~\ (\, \.' / '.
I... ./ \
\1\ \.\ l i'-C:---n I r:::1jT~-"'i' L~J U:dJ
I 1.-":::] ',_-='-1 '_.--' 'l..... ~ \---
~O'~RD Ot SUPERVISORS
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
December 30, 1991
Proposed Revisions to Personal Property and Motor Vehicle
Ordinances
Recently, the Department of Finance has been working on amendments
to the County code which will clarify and hopefully simplify
sections of the finance and taxation portion of the Code.
Specifically, Article I, Sections 8.1-8.1.9 are recommended to be
renumbered as proposed for simplification and consistency within
the chapter. Article XIV, Section 8-79 through Section 8-81 and
Article XV, Section 8-82 through Section 8-84 are new Sections
which complete the clarification from Article I. There are no
substantive changes to the body of these proposed sections.
In addition, the following Articles will codify the resolution
passed in June, 1990 which provides for incentives to encourage
recruitment and retention of our volunteer emergency service
personnel.
Article XIV, Section 8-85, is a new section which codifies the
personal property tax exemption for emergency service personnel.
Article V, Section 12-23 proposes to be amended to refer to the
newly created Section 8-85 for qualifications required to obtain a
free decal for members of volunteer fire companies or rescue
squads.
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the amendments and staff
recommends that a public hearing be set for the February 5th
meeting to receive public comment on the proposed changes.
RWT,Jr/REH,II/dbm
91.248
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 8, FINANCE AND TAXATION
OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, that Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation, Article I, In
General, is hereby amended and reenacted and Articles XIV, Real
Estate - In General and XV, Personal Property - In General are
hereby enacted as follows:
*******
Article I. In General.
~ee~--8-i~--Exem ~~efi-e~-ee~~a~fi- e~sefia~- -~~em-~axa~~e"~
-----~fte-~e~~ew~"~-fte~sefte~a-afia-~e~sefia~- ~ee~s-a~e-fte~e~y-exem~~ea
f~em-~axa~~efi~
-----taT--B~eye~es~
-----t~T--He~sefte~a-afia-k~~eftefi-~ ~fi~~~~eT-~fie~~a~fi~-~e~a-afia-s~~ve~
~~a~esT-~~a~ea-wa~eT-Wa~efteS-afi -e~eeksT-sew~fi~-maeft~fieST--
~ef~~~e~a~e~sT-a~~ema~~e-~e~~' e~a~~fi~-maeft~fie~y-e~-afiy-~y~eT-vae~~m
e~eafie~s-afia-a~~-e~fte~-fte~se e~a-maeft~fie~YT-~eeksT-~~~ea~ms-afia
wea~efis-e~-a~~-k~fias~
-----teT--P~afiesT-e~~afis -~ftefie~~a~ftS-afia-~eee~a-~~aye~s-afia-~eee~as
~e-~e-~sea-~fte~eW~~ft-afi -a~~-e~fte~-m~s~ea~-~fis~~~mefi~S-e~-wfta~eve~
k~fia-afia-a~~-~aa~e-afi ~e~ev~s~efi-~fis~~~mefi~s-afia-eq~~~mefi~~
-----taT--e~~-~a~fi~. ~sT-~~e~~~esT-s~a~~a~yT-e~~~esT-a~~~e~es-er-v~~~~
afia-werks-e~-ar~~
-----teT--B~amefiasT-eamees-e~-e~fte~-~~ee~e~s-s~efies-afia-a~~-~~ee~e~s
me~a~s-~sea-as-erfiamefi~s-e~-;ewe~~y~
-----t~T--S~er~~fi~-afia-~fte~e~~a~ft~e-eq~~~mefi~~
-----t~T--e~e~ft~fi~-afia-e~;ee~s-e~-a~~a~e~~
-----tftT--A~~-e~fte~-~afi~~~~e-~e~sefia~-~~e~e~~y-~sea-~y-afi-~fia~v~a~a~
e~-a-~am~~y-e~-fte~sefte~a-~fie~aefi~-~e-ma~fi~a~fi~fi~-afi-a~eae~
-----~fte-e~ass~~~ea~~efi-se~-~e~~ft-aeeve-sfta~~-a~~~y-efi~y-~e-s~eft
~re~e~~y-ewfiea-afia-~sea-~y-afi-~fia~v~a~a~-e~-~y-a-~am~~y-e~-fte~sefte~a
~fie~aefi~-~e-ma~fi~a~fi~fi~-afi-a~eae~--teeae-i96TT-See~-9-i~T
Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation
Page 2 of 9
See~--e-%~%~--Bfeflflf8~-8ssessmefl~-e~-~e8~-es~a~e~
-----fat--A~~-~ea~-es~8~e-ffl-~he-ee~fl~y-sha~~-he-assessed-hfeflflf8~~Y
fe~-~~~~eses-ef-~a~8~fefl-hy he-df~ee~e~-ef-f~aflee-ef-~he-ee~ft~Y-8S
ef-J8ft~a~y-%-ef-eaeh-edd-ye ,-afld-a~~-~a~ -fe~-eaeh-eveft-ye8~-eft
s~eh-~e8~-es~8~e-sha~~-he e eflded-efl-~ -hasfs-ef-~he-~8s~
8SSeSSmefl~-m8de-~~fe~-~e eh-yea~~
-----fht--~he-efffee-e e-8SSeSSmefl~S-ef-~he-ee~ft~y-h8~
eefld~e~ed-8-fteW-~e8s Smefl~-e a~~-~ea~-~~e~e~~y-~e-he-8~~~fe8b~e-eft
~e8~-eS~8~e-fe~-~he-, -yea~- e~fflflffl~-Jafl~a~y-%,-%9TT,-8fld-sh8~~
eeftd~e~-8-flew-~e8~smefl~- -8~~-~ea~-~~e~e~~y-hfeflflfa~~y-~e-be
a~~~fe8h~e-fe~-~he- ~-ye -be~fflflffl~-Jafl~a~y-%-ef-eve~y-edd-~8~-ye8~
~he~e8f~e~~--~he-ef fee f-~ea~-es~a~e-assessmefl~-may-eem~~e~e-5~eh
~e8ssessmefl~-d~~ffl~-8 efl~f~e-~we-yea~-~e~fed,-em~~eyffl~-~he-s8me
s~aftda~ds-ef-va~~e-f ~-a~~-a~~~afsa~s-made-d~~ffl~-s~eh-~e~fed~
-----fet--Be~fflflf -wf~h-assessmefl~-effee~fve-efl-Jafl~8~y-%,-%9TT,
8~~-8ssessmefl~s-e -~ea~-es~a~e-ffl-~he-ee~fi~-sha~~-he-made-a~-efle
h~fld~ed-~e~-eefl~~m-f8f~-ma~ke~-va~~e~--f%%-3-T6~t
~~ec. 8-1.21. Erroneous Assessments.
(a) The director of finance of the county, after diligent
investigation and upon being satisfied that he has erroneously
assessed a taxpayer with any local levies shall, if the levies have
not been paid, exonerate the taxpayer from payment of so much thereof
as is erroneous, and if such levies have been paid, shall refund to
the taxpayer the amount erroneously paid together with any penalties
and interest paid thereon.
(b) When the director of finance who made the erroneous
assessment has been succeeded by another person, such person
shall have the same authority as the director making the original
erroneous assessment; provided, that he makes diligent
investigation to determine that the original assessment was
erroneously made and certifies thereto to his local governing
body.
(c) Any application by an aggrieved taxpayer for correction of
a tax assessment must be made within five years from the last day of
the tax year for which such assessment is made.
(d) Reports itemizing such refunds shall be made to the board
of supervisors on a quarterly basis. (11-3-76; 4-13-88; 2-14-90.)
Ordinance
pa~e 3 of
/
I
to amend and reenact Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation
9
/
\//sec. 8-1.~2. Penalty for returned checks.
(a) If any check tendered for any tax due under this chapter is
not paid by the bank on which it is drawn, the taxpayer for whom such
check was tendered shall remain liable for the payment of the tax the
same as if such check had not been tendered.
(b) If such person fails to pay the amount shown on the face of
the check within five days after notice of such nonpayment has been
mailed by certified or registered mail to the taxpayer by the
director of finance, a penalty of twenty-five dollars shall be added
to the tax due. Such penalty shall be in addition to any and all
other penalties provided by law. (11-3-76; 4-13-88.)
I
/Sec. 8-1.43. Penalty: interest: date and manner of payment.
!
V
(a) Taxes due and owing to the county for real estate shall be
due and payable in one installment on or before the fifth day of
December of the year such taxes are assessed.
(b) Taxes due and owing to the county for tangible personal
property, machinery and tools, mobile homes and public service
corporations shall be due and payable in two installments on or
before the fifth day of June and the fifth day of December of the
year such taxes are assessed.
(c) Supplemental tax assessments for real estate, tangible
personal property, machinery and tools, mobile homes and public
service corporations shall be due and payable within 30 days of the
billing date.
(d) A penalty equal to ten percent of the amount past due shall
apply on all taxes remaining unpaid after the due date.
(e) Interest at the rate of ten percent per annum shall
apply on all taxes and penalties commencing the first day of the
month following the month in which such taxes are due and continuing
until paid.
(f) The provisions herein are in no way intended to alter any
other provisions of state law or county ordinance, the subject of
which is not specifically addressed herein. (8-10-77; 10-8-80;
~14-90.)
~ Sec. 8-1.54. Use of credit card in payment of taxes.
The director of finance is authorized to accept payments of local
taxes by use of a credit card. In addition to any penalties and
interest, the director of finance shall add to such payment a sum not
to exceed four per centum of the amount of the tax, penalty and
interest paid, as a service charge for the acceptance of such card.
Such service charge shall not exceed the percentage charged to the
county by the credit card company. (10-2-85.)
Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation
Page 4 of 9
/
/
See~--e-%~6~--ABBeBBmefi~-e~-fiew-~~~!d~fi~B-B~~B~efi~~e!!v
/ eem~!e~ed~
-----Eve~y-fiew-~~~%d~fi~-B~~B~efi~~e!!y-eemp% ed-e~-~~~-~e~-~Be7
eee~pefiey-efid-efi;eymefi~-p~~e~-~e-Nevem~e~ -e~-~fte-yee~-e~-eemp%e~~eft
Bfte!%-~e-eBBeBBed-wfteft-Be-eemp!e~ed-e~- ~-~e~-~Be-efid-eee~pefteY7-efia
~fte-d~~ee~e~-e~-~~fiefiee-Bfte!!-efi~e~-~ ~fte-~eekB-~fte-~e~~-me~ke~
Ve%~e-e~-B~eft-~~~%d~fi~~--Ne-pe~~~e!- BBeBBmefi~-eB-p~ev~ded-fte~e~ft
Bfta%%-beeeme-e~~ee~~Ve-~fi~~%-~fi~e~ ~~efi-aB-~e-~fte-aa~e-afia-ame~ft~-er
B~eft-aBBeBBmefi~-~B-~eee~ded-~fi-~ -e~~~ee-e~-~fte-d~~ee~e~-ef-r~ftaftee
afia-made-ava~%ab%e-fe~-p~b!~e-~ Bpee~~efi~--~fte-~e~e%-~aX-efi-afiY-B~eft
ftew-b~~!d~ft~-re~-~fta~-yea~-Bfta !-be-~fte-B~m-ef-f~T-~fte-~ex-~peft-~fte
aBBeBBmefi~-er-~fte-eemp%e~ed- ~!d~fi~7-eemp~~ed-eeee~d~fi~-~e-~fte
~a~~e-Wft~eft-~fte-pe~~~eft-e~- e-yee~-B~eft-b~~!d~fi~-~B-B~bB~aft~~a%%y
eemp!e~ed-e~-r~~-fe~-~Be-a a-eee~pefiey-bea~B-~e-~fte-efi~~~e-yea~7-aftd
f~~T-~fte-~eX-~pefi-~fte-eBB BBmefi~-ef-B~eft-b~~!d~fi~-eB-~~-eX~B~ea-eft
Jaft~a~y-%-ef-~fte~-eBBeBB efi~-yee~7-eemp~~ed-eeee~d~fi~-~e-~fte-~a~~e
Wft~eft-~fte-pe~~~efi-ef-~ft -yee~-B~eft-~~~!d~fi~-WeB-fie~-B~~B~afi~~e!!y
eemp%e~e-e~-f~~-fe~-~B -afid-eee~pefiey-bee~B-~e-~fte-efi~~~e-yea~~--W~~ft
~eBpee~-~e-afiy-aBBeBB efi~-~ftde~-~ft~B-Bee~~efi-af~e~-Sep~embe~-i-er-afty
yea~7-~fte-pefia%~y-fe~~fiefipeymeft~-by-Beeembe~-5-Bfte!!-be-ex~efidea-~e
~eb~~a~y-5-ef-~fte-B~eeeed~ft~-yee~~--f9-9-e~~T
/
,
I
/ See~--e-i~~~--~~me-!~m~~B-fe~-a ee!-eB~e~e-eBBeBBmefi~B~
\;/
-----P~~B~efi~-~e-~fte-p~ev~s~efts-ef- ee~~eft-5e~%-333e-ef-~fte-eede-er
V~~~~fi~e7-a!!-app!~ea~~efts-fe~-e ea!-~~em-efty-asBeBBmefi~-ef-~ea!
eB~a~e-m~B~-be-mede-~y-~fte-p~e e~~y-eWfte~-e~-!essee-W~~ft~fi-fi~fie~y
daYB-f~em-~fte-fie~~ee-de~e-e~ fte-~ee!-eB~e~e-asBeBBmefi~-eftafi~e~--%ft
aeee~deftee-w~~ft-see~~eft-5a -33~a-ef-~fte-eede-ef-V~~~~fi~a7-afiY
aaa~~~efia%-eppea%-m~B~-b -made-~e-~fte-bea~d-ef-eq~a!~~a~~eft-w~~ft~ft
~ft~~~y-daYB~--Appea%s- -p~e-~a~a-assessmeft~-Wfte~e-fteW-eeftB~~~e~~eft
beeemeB-S~bs~eft~~e%%y-eemp!e~e-be~weeft-Jeft~a~y-i-eftd-ee~ebe~-3i-a~e
fte~-affee~ed-bY-~fte-Ma~eft-3i-e~-Ap~~!-3e-dead%~fteB~--f~-i~-a9~T
(;/
See~--a-i~e~--~ax-Ve!~e~~eft,-e~e~,-de~e-~e~-~eft~~~!e-~e~Befie!
~~e~e~~v,-meeft~fte~v-efid-~ee!s~
~aft~~b%e-Pe~sefte!-P~epe~~Y7-exee -as-p~ev~ded-~ftde~-See~~eft-a-i~97
Bfta!!-be-~axed-as-ef-Jeft~a~y- '~s~-e~-eaeft-yea~~--~fte-B~a~~B-e~-a!!
pe~BeftB7-f~~mB7-ee~pe~a~~e -aftd-e~fte~-~axpaye~B-!~e~!e-~e-~axa~~eft
eft-efty-s~eft-p~epe~~y-sfta -~e-~~xed-as-e~-s~eft-de~e-~ft-eaeft-yea~-aftd
~fte-va!~e-ef-s~eft-p~ep ~y-sfta!!-be-~akeft-as-e~-s~eft-da~e~
~fte-d~~ee~e~-ef-f~ ftee-sfta%%-fte~-meke-aft-assessmeft~-~ftde~-~fte
p~ev~B~efts-ef-~ft~ -see~~eft-~~-~fte-essessmeft~-we~!d-~es~%~-~ft-~fte
~ss~aftee-ef-a-~ -b~!!-~ft-eft-eme~ft~-!ess-~ftaft-~~ve-de!!a~B~
f~-i4-geT
Ordipance to amend and reenact Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation
Pag~ 5 of 9
7
/
~;See~--e-%~9~--p~e~a~~eft-e~-~aft~~ble-pe~Seftal-p~e~e~~v~
-----tat--~fte-~aft~~ble-Pe~seftal-P~epe~~y-~ax-sftall-be-lev~ea-~peft
me~e~-veft~eles-wft~eft-ae~~~~e-a-s~~~s-W~~ft~ft-~fte-ee~ft~y-a~~e~-Jaft~a~y
r~~s~-e~-afty-~ax-yea~-~e~-~fte-~ema~ft~ft~-pe~~~eft-e~-~fte-~ax-yea~t
s~eft-~ax-sftall-be-p~e~a~ea-eft-a-meft~ftly-bas~s~
-----tbt--Wfteft-afty-me~e~-veft~ele-leses-~~s-s~~~S-~ft-~fte-~e~ft~y-e~
eftaft~es-ewfte~sft~p-a~~e~-Jaft~a~y-~~~s~-e~-~fte-~ax-yea~- /y-~ax-as-
sessea-eft-s~eft-veft~ele-sftall-be-~el~evea,-e~-~e~~ft -~~-pa~a~--S~eft
~el~e~-e~-~e~~fta-sftall-be-p~e~a~ea-eft-a-meft~ftly- s~s~
-----tet--Wftefteve~-a-me~e~-veft~ele-w~~ft-a-s~ S-~ft-~fte-ee~ft~y-~s
~~afts~e~~ea-~e-a-ftew-ewfte~-w~~ft~ft-~fte-ee~ft ,-~fte-ftew-ewfte~-sftall-be
s~b;ee~-~e-~axa~~eft-eft-a-p~e~a~ea-bas~s- ~-~fte-~ema~ft~ft~-pe~~~eft-er
efte-~ax-yea~~--~fte-p~ev~e~s-ewfte~-sftal be-el~~~ble-~e~-~el~er-e~
~e~~fta-as-p~ev~aea-by-pa~a~~apft-tbt-e -~ft~s-see~~eft~
-----tat--Fe~-~fte-p~~peses-e~-~ft~s see~~eft-a-pe~~ea-e~-me~e-~ftaft
efte-ftalr-er-a-meft~ft-sftall-be-ee~ ea-as-a-~~ll-meft~ft-afta-a-pe~~ea-er
less-~ftaft-efte-ftal~-e~-a-meft~ft-s ll-fte~-be-ee~ft~ea~
-----tet--~fte-a~~ee~e~-e~-~~ft ftee-may-apply-afty-~e~~ftas-~ftae~-~ft~s
see~~eft-~e-afty-ael~ftq~eft~-a e~ft~s-ewea-bY-~fte-~axpaye~~--Ift
aaa~~~eft,-~ft~s-~e~~fta-may- -appl~ea-as-a-e~ea~~-~ewa~a-~fte-~ax-a~e
eft-a-ftewly-ae~~~~ea-me~e~ eft~ele~
------t~t--Eaeft-~axpaye~-ewft~ft~-~aft~~ble-pe~seftal-p~epe~~y-w~~ft-a
s~~~S-W~~ft~ft-~fte-ee~ft~y-sftall-~~le-a-~e~~~ft-eft-~e~ms-p~ese~~bea
bY-~fte-a~~ee~e~-e~-~~ftaftee-eft-e~-be~e~e-Jaft~a~y-3%-e~-eaeft-yea~
e~-w~~ft~ft-3e-aays-e~-~fte-aa~e-e~-p~~eftase-e~-~fte-es~abl~sftmefte-er
a-s~~~s-W~~ft~ft-~fte-ee~ft~y~
-----t~t--~aft~~ble-Pe~seftal-P~epe~~y,-wft~eft-was-Ie~ally-assessea
by-afte~fte~-;H~~sa~e~~eft-~ft-~fte-eemmeftweal~ft-afta-eft-wft~eft-~fte-~ax
ftas-beeft-pa~a,-a~e-exemp~-~~em-~axa~~eft-~ftae~-~ft~s-see~~eft-~e~
~fte--pe~~~eft-er-~fte-yea~-s~eft-p~epe~~y-was-Ie~ally-assessable-by
afte~fte~-;H~~sa~e~~eft-~ft-~fte-eemmeftweal~ft~--tz-%4-ge~t
Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation
Page 6 of 9
,~
~
Sec. 8-7~. Biennial assessment of real estate.
/
~~
Article XIV. Real Estate - In General
(a) All real estate in the county shall be assessed biennially
for purposes of taxation by the director of finance of the county as
of January 1 of each odd year, and all taxes for each even ye T on
such real estate shall be extended on the basis of the last
assessment made prior to such year.
(b) The office of real estate assessments of the c
conducted a new reassessment of all real property to be on
real estate for the tax year beginning January 1, 1977~ and shall
conduct a new reassessment of all real property bienn' lly to be
applicable for the tax year beginning January 1 of ev ry odd tax year
thereafter. The office of real estate assessment ma complete such
reassessment during an entire two year period, empl ying the same
standards of value for all appraisals made during ch period.
(c) Beginning with assessment effective on anuary 1, 1977,
all assessments of real estate in the count shall be made at one
hundred per centum fair market value. (11-3-76.
/
.~S
Sec. 8-ac(.' Assessment of new buildinqs substantially completed.
/
Every new building substantially completed or fit for use,
occupancy and enjoyment prior to November 1 of the year of completion
shall be assessed when so completed or fit for use and occupancy, and
the director of finance shall enter in the books the fair market
value of such building. No partial assessment as provided herein
shall become effective until information as to the date and amount of
such assessment is recorded in the office of the director of finance
and made available for public inspection. The total tax on any such
new building for that year shall be the sum of (i) the tax upon the
assessment of the completed building, computed according to the
ratio which the portion of the year such building is substantially
completed or fit for use and occupancy bears to the entire year, and
(ii) the tax upon the assessment of such building as it existed on
January 1 of that assessment year, computed according to the ratio
which the portion of the year such building was not substantially
complete or fit for use and occupancy bears to the entire year. with
respect to any assessment under this section after September 1 of any
year, the penalty for nonpayment by December 5 shall be extended to
February 5 of the succeeding year. (9-9-87.)
Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation
Page 7 of 9
l;-'-r
Sec. 8- 1. Time limits for a eals of real estate assessments.
1-
Pursuant to the provisions of section 58.1-3330 of the Code of
Virginia, all applications for appeal from any assessment of real
estate must be made by the property owner or lessee within ninety
days from the notice date of the real estate assessment change. In
accordance with section 58.1-3378 of the Code of Virginia, any
additional appeal must be made to the board of equalization within
thirty days. Appeals on pro rata assessment where new construction
becomes substantially complete between January 1 and October 31 are
not affected by the March 31 or April 30 deadlines. (7-12-89.)
'+, \ j
Article xV. Personal Property - In General
r
I ~\
Sec. 8-~~CExemption of certain personal property from taxation.
/
The following household and personal effects are hereby exempted
from taxation:
(a) Bicycles.
(b) Household and kitchen furniture, including gold and silver
plates, plated ware, watches and clocks, sewing machines,
refrigerators, automatic refrigerating machinery of any type, vacuum
cleaners and all other household machinery, books, firearms and
weapons of all kinds.
(c) Pianos, organs, phonographs and record players and records
to be used therewith and all other musical instruments of whatever
kind and all radio and television instruments and equipment.
(d) oil paintings, pictures, statuary, curios, articles of virtu
and works of art.
(e) Diamonds, cameos or other precious stones and all precious
metals used as ornaments or jewelry.
(f) Sporting and photographic equipment.
(g) Clothing and objects of apparel.
(h) All other tangible personal property used by an individual
or a family or household incident to maintaining an abode.
The classification set forth above shall apply only to such
property owned and used by an individual or by a family or household
incident to maintaining an abode. (Code 1967, Sec. 9-1.)
~
.
Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation
Page 8 of 9
~~
Sec. 8-83. Tax Valuation. etc.. date for tanqible personal
property: machinery and tools.
Tangible Personal Property, except as provided under section
8-84, shall be taxed as of January first of each year. The
status of all persons, firms, corporations and other taxpayers
liable to taxation on any such property shall be fixed as of such
date in each year and the value of such property shall be taken
as of such date.
The director of finance shall not make an assessment under the
provisions of this section if the assessment would result in the
issuance of a tax bill in an amount less than five dollars.
(2-14-90)
,10~
Sec. 8-84.' Proration of Tanqible Personal Property.
(a) The Tangible Personal Property tax shall be levied upon
motor vehicles which acquire a situs within the County after January
first of any tax year for the remaining portion of the tax year;
such tax shall be prorated on a monthly basis.
(b) When any motor vehicle loses its situs in the County or
changes ownership after January first of the tax year any tax
assessed on such vehicle shall be relieved, or refunded if paid.
Such relief or refund shall be prorated on a monthly basis.
(c) Whenever a motor vehicle with a situs in the County is
transferred to a new owner within the County, the new owner shall be
subject to taxation on a prorated basis for the remaining portion of
the tax year. The previous owner shall be eligible for relief or
refund as provided by paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) For the purposes of this section a period of more than
one-half of a month shall be counted as a full month and a period of
less than one-half of a month shall not be counted.
(e) The director of finance may apply any refunds under this
section to any delinquent accounts owed by the taxpayer. In
addition, this refund may be applied as a credit toward the tax due
on a newly acquired motor vehicle.
(f) Each taxpayer owning tangible personal property with a
situs within the County shall file a return on forms prescribed by
the director of finance on or before January 31 of each year or
within 30 days of the date of purchase or the establishment of a
situs within the County.
(g) Tangible Personal Property, which was legally assessed
by another jurisdiction in the Commonwealth and on which the tax
has been paid, are exempt from taxation under this section for
the portion of the year such property was legally assessable by
another jurisdiction in the Commonwealth. (2-14-90.)
~
.
Ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation
Page 9 of 9
. ,
/ I
Sec. 8-8~. Volunteer Rescue Squad and Fire Company Workers.
(a) Items of property owned by members of a volunteer
rescue squad or fire company which meet the criteria set forth in
this section shall constitute a class of property separate from
other classifications of tanqible personal property.
(b) Qualified property~s limited to one motor vehicle
as defined in Code of Virqinia Section 46.2-100 owned and
reqistered or partially owned and registered with the Virqinia
Department of Motor Vehicles by the qualifyinq volunteer rescue
squad or fire company member. Qualification may not be
transferred from one vehicle to another durinq a six month
billinq cycle as lonq as the original vehicle reported remains in
the volunteer's ownership.
(c) The motor vehicle must be reqularly used by the
qualifyinq volunteer rescue squad or fire company member to
respond to calls.
(d) The qualifyinq volunteer must have completed minimum
traininq requirements and 100 hours of volunteer activities
during the preceding 12 months. Eliqible volunteer hours are
limited to hours attendinq squad/company meetinqs, traininq
sessions or actual responses to calls.
(e) Qualifying volunteers must meet the minimum
requirements and be an active member of the squad/company as of
June 1 or December 1 to be eligible for the next six month
billinq cycle beqinninq the following July 1 or January 1.
The Chief or captain of each squad/company shall provide bY June
15 and December 15 a certified list of all members who have met
the eliqibility criteria. Volunteers will not be eliqible for a
refund on any tax paid or assessed prior to meetinq the
eliqibility criteria and beinq included on the appropriate
listinq.
(f) The tax rate for the first $4,500 of assessed value
shall be set at $0.00 and the balance of the assessed value shall
be set at the qeneral personal property tax rate.
(Virginia Code section 58.1-3506)
FURTHER ORDAINED that in all other respects Chapter 8, Finance
and Taxation, of the Code of Albemarle remains the same; and
BE IT ALSO ORDAINED that all amendments shall be effective with
the 1991 tax year.
.
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, that Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, Article V,
County Vehicle Licenses, section 12-23 is hereby amended and
reenacted as follows:
*******
Sec. 12-23. Same--Volunteer ~Fire~efi Company and ~Rescue
~SQuad~meft Members.
Any person listed on the active rolls of any volunteer fire
company or rescue squad who Qualifies under section 8-85 shall be
exempt from the license fee provisions of this article as to any
one vehicle registered to such person-e~-~e-a-~e~be~-e~-ft~~
fte~~efte~a. (11-15-73.)
(Virginia Code Section 46.2-752)
FURTHER ORDAINED that in all other respects Chapter 12, Motor
Vehicles and Traffic, of the Code of Albemarle remains the same;
and
BE IT ALSO ORDAINED that the amendment is effective with the 1991
license year.
-.
Edward H, Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
MEMORANDUM
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David p, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S, Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte y, Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F, Perkins
While Hall
TO: Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CM~
DATE: March 5, 1992
SUBJECT: Appropriation Request - United Way Child Care
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on February 5, 1992, the
Board approved an appropriation request to transfer $10,000 in FY
91-92 unused funds from the United Way Teen Scholarship Program
to the Child Care Fee Program in the Department of Social
Services to pursue funding of the Teensight Program in FY 92-93.
Attached is the signed appropriation form.
Attachment
LEN:ec
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Karen Morris
C::::TR;:u..n7D..... ~ ~ ~-
- T-.) uO",,,O J'''''.'3~''''S
O~,;. '" n'CJf'l ~.,\
i. -"L, 21- 9..2-
.... -4
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
'. i~ _;.,,~
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item t:
9!./11? gel
Title: United Way Scholarship Fund
Request: To transfer $10,000 in FY 91/92 unused funds from the
United Way Teen Scholarship Program to the Child Care Fee Program
in the Department of Social Services and to pursue funding of the
Teensight program in FY 92/93.
Background: At your November 13, 1991 meeting, the United Way
Child Care Scholarship Program requested permission to transfer
$10,000 in unused funds from the teen scholarship program to their
regular scholarship program for working parents. Al though the
county had originally appropriated $20,000 to the teen program,
United Way staff estimated that they would only use $10,000 before
the end of the fiscal year.
The Board deferred a decision asking staff to determine if there
were other ways to direct the $10,000 in order to fulfill the
orginal intent of the grant, which was to help teen age mothers.
In December staff met with representatives from United Way, the
Department of Social Services, Teensight, and the Central Virginia
Child Development Agency, in addition to guidance counselors from
AHS and WAHS to discuss the needs of teenage mothers in Albemarle
County.
Analysis: Although teenage mothers in Albemarle County are not
using the United Way Child Care Program, the need to assist these
girls was clear from the discussion. There are currently eleven
teen mothers at Albemarle High School and nine at Western Albemarle
High School. Although all mothers attending school need some help
with day care, they do not utilize United Way for several reasons:
1) the families are proud and do not want to be labeled "welfare";
2) most day care providers are family members, i.e. mothers,
grandmothers, aunts, who do not wish to have their homes inspected,
.
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
United Way Scholarship Fund
Page 2
a requirement for DSS day care providers; 3) although most would
qualify, they do not want to disclose their financial situation.
Although the girls do need help with day care to either supplement
a family member for expenses or when a family member is not
available, both guidance counselors stressed the importance of
other financial pressures on these families, ie. food, medicine,
pampers, clothing, etc. Equally important as financial help, the
girls also need parenting skills and vocational guidance, as well
as less instructional guidance and support, such as building self-
esteem, self-sufficiency, motivation, etc.
One program currently attempting to provide this type of support in
the Albemarle schools is Teensight. Teensight works with the
guidance counselors to keep the girls in school, using a cash
incentive of $5.00 per day if the girls maintain good attendance
and grades. Under current funding limitations, Teensight has only
been able to provide funds to the girls during the second half of
the year. Teensight also provides a group session for the girls
every other week at each school. Sessions include parenting
skills, self-esteem building, vocational/career direction, or
discussion centered on issues raised by the girls themselves.
Teensight benefits the girls in several ways other than daycare.
It provides a small cash incentive to encourage the girls to stay
in school and gives them the discretion to use the money for
whatever is needed to help their families with additional expenses.
The guidance counselors are pleased with the program and report
that the girl's attendance and grades are good. The groups are well
attended and both counselors have indicated that a weekly group
would be beneficial.
Recommendation: Should the Board wish to continue their support
for teen mothers, staff recommends that funding be directed to the
Teensight program for FY 92/93. However, it is not recommended
that the $10,000 from United Way be transferred to Teensight in the
current fiscal year for three reasons:
· Teensight is able to provide cash incentives
for day care, supplies, etc. to the girls
during the second half of the school year, but
could use additional funds next fall.
· Teensight should submit a proposal to the
County prior to any allocation of funds from
the Board. This would be consistent with other
'"
.
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
United Way Scholarship Fund
Page 3
agency funding requirements, and would allow the
county to evaluate the services to be provided, the
cost of those services, and the anticipated
outcomes of the program. Based on their proposal, a
funding recommendation will be included in the
FY92-93 budget.
An opportunity exists to use the $10,000 in the
current year to pull down $20,000 in child care fee
program monies from the Federal government. This
$20,000 could be used to keep approximately 37
families from being terminated from this program at
the end of February when current day care dollars
run out. The Social Services fee-based child care
helps working families with day care under
eligibili ty criteria similar to the United Way
Scholarship Program.
For these reasons, it is recommended that the $10,000 in unused
funds from the United Way child care scholarship teen mother
program be transferred to the fee-based child care program
administered by the Department of Social Services for the current
fiscal year. It is further recommended that the Board consider,
during budget review, funding the Teensight program to assist teen
mothers at Albemarle and Western Albemarle High Schools in FY92/93
based on staff's review of Teensight's proposal.
Staff Contact(s): Mr. Tucker and Ms. White.
/bat
92.036
DATE \A dUUI4.1.!J '11 q "j:J-.
AGENDA ITEM NO. t;-a . .0 J.. O~. Cj /
AGENDA ITEM NAME 9/2.[lJ1{J1"-. 0/- \jwlo)u/;jatl~ fh-oafL
{J,1LUIL<iftc fUx.f1vlrtu-d
DEFERRED UNTIL --p()]3L- IG HE4I2/f0f9. .~d hfz
/!ld((Ct! I~ /!f9d-
Form. 3
7/25/86
.
.~,...
C ';'C~. "'IT....
'-"'"-',-,Dr':)2nt~'D /l"" ~
0,'4 1-.2..,~' \,' "",,\3:d~S
'..~-L:...ZLf ~
\...~t) L~ j\~
I"~"~ " ,~::'~:~, '1 AR' ec
t__.L..2>-_:\~, L,C
.. .. ,<>" ,.., ,...-, rr-"
.' ,) ...., , ,\ , ! j:..... "
"""~\!1
,I: .
Ii!
/11:
';TV'''T:=';, U/J
r~::':l rn_~
I' " .
Il i,':}';l))
- - ,L1 \,,! ~~;~.) ;,?S ~:!
I :. , ,
(\\
1) Lt :~~~=~, .'~rd:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
!BOA;:;:[) CF :;:;;';"':!iFEr-: ~/ i~:0qS
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item t:
9.}. o[4oS-. "IJ
Title: Police Officer Skill Proficiency Plan Proposal
Issue: A proposed skill proficiency plan is presented by the
Police Department in an effort to address two major concerns. One
is that an effort is needed to keep skilled police officers on the
street to perform their duties as an alternative to moving into
supervision. Secondly, at the present time, 36 of 42 patrol
officers are in the A, B or C step of the salary scale which is
creating quite a morale problem when new police officers are hired
and reach the same or higher step within 1-3 years of employment.
This plan provides a mechanism for rewarding those officers with
specialized skills and high proficiency scores thus providing a
separation in pay grade between these patrolmen and new officers.
Background:
1/27/92.
Please see attached memo from Chief Miller dated
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed
plan to be funded from existing resources in the current fiscal
year.
Staff Contact(s): Messrs. Tucker and Huff.
/dbm
92.033
Attachment
.
, "-',
~.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
DRAFT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MR. ROBERT TUCKER, COUNTY EXECUTIVE
CHIEF JOHN F. MILLER ~ '\. ""'....! ..-.
JANUARY 27, 1992
RE:
POLICE OFFICER SKILL PROFICIENCY PLAN PROPOSAL
FOR IMPLEMENTATION
The ability to recruit and retain quality employees is
important to any organization. It is especially crucial in a
police agency where citizens' lives and property depend on the
rapid response of well-trained officers who are knowledgeable
about and committed to the community they serve. Police officers
who have a long-term affiliation with the County and who are
completely familiar with local geography, businesses and
residents and are endowed with state-of the art knowledge of law
enforcement principles, are essential to our department's
success.
A Police Officer Skill Proficiency Plan will help establish
the necessary stability while increasing motivation and job
satisfaction and, have the added benefit of enhancing our
officers' skills and abilities to meet the challenges of rapid
growth and increasingly sophisticated, criminal activity in
Albemarle County. The program emphasizes on-going education,
physical well-being and high-level training and will produce
specialists in a diverse range of enforcement areas of
specialization that we expect to become absolutely vital services
in the County's near future.
Most traditional developMent programs reward participants by
transferring or promoting them away from the areas in which they
have exhibited outstanding skill and aptitude because this is the
only avenue available to advance or improve their financial
worth. Our plan rewards motivated officers without removing them
from the positions where they have proven so valuable and
successful. We want to encourage officers to stay on the street
where their experience and expertise can best serve the community
by making the police officer position a more productive,
satisfying, and rewarding career goal.
"
. '1 ,-J ..
f'-1r. Tu cker
Page Two
January 27, 1992
Our Police Officer Skill Proficiency Plan adoption will
result in financial savings as well as in improved morale,
increased productivity and expanded professional services.
The costs associated with bringing a new police officer into
our department total over $35,000.00 for just the first six
months. Capital costs such as equipment and vehicles are
recoverable, but a large portion of expenditures can not be
recouped when an officer leaves the agency. Personnel,
recruitment and training costs and operating expenses alone
exceed $16,500.00 for the first six months for each new police
officer we hire. They must stay with the department for at least
three years before we begin to see a return on our initial
investment. By investing in this plan the County can reduce
police department personnel costs significantly in the long run.
Citizens expect and deserve increasingly technicial,
professional and wide-ranging services from their law enforcement
personnel. The best way for us to respond to their expectations
is through a stable, experienced police department whose
expertise will address a full range of enforcement needs. We
will go a long way in insuring productivity, continuity, quality
and diversity in our police department through the attached
Police Officer Skill Proficiency Plan.
I recommend that compensation for the first level of the
plan be the advancement of (1) one pay grade (5% increase) above
the regular police officer grade thus creating a skill
proficiency pay grade range. Compensation for Levels II, III and
IV would be by stipends in the following increments:
LEVEL II
LEVEL III
LEVEL IV
$ 1,000
$ 2,000
$ 3,000
I also recommend that the first level of the plan be
implemented the last quarter of this fiscal year. The
implementation cost for this fiscal year would be $7,221 and
total cost for fiscal year 92/93 would be approximately $28,886.
The implementation schedule for the remaining three levels
would be as follows:
LEVEL II
LEVEL III
LEVEL IV
F.Y. 93/94
F.Y. 94/95
F.Y. 95/96
'" ~-.....
GOAL STATEMENT
The goal of the Albemarle County police Department Skill
Proficiency Plan is to develop and retain "highly" qualified
Police Officers, to deliver effective services to the citizens of
Albemarle County. The program is designed to:
*
Provide a system that will attract and retain highly
competent individuals to the police officer profession.
*
Provide police officers with skills that are ~ore
consistant with the critical services the police
department provides to the community.
*
Fulfill one of the basic values of the Albemarle
County Police Department which is the belief that
"its greatest potential is achieved by supporting
the development of its employees and their
active participation in the development and
implementation of Departmental Policies."
*
Provide an alternative incentive for Police Officers
who do not desire supervisory positions, or for whom
supervisory vacancies are not available.
*
Provide a professional system of skill proficiency
designation for police officers.
"
~- ~
BACKGROUND
The Albemarle County Police Department was created in July,
1983. The force consists of one rank of police officers, and a
series of supervisory positions, i.e. sergeants, lieutenants, and
captain, in addition to the ChieE. Because the police department
is relatively small, the opportunity for officers to attain
promotion to supervisory positions was limited. Except for
mandatory training, officers had no incentive to increase their
skill level or to exceed minimal requirements for their
positions. As the present force increased in seniority the
potential problem of having to replace officers in the future
needed to be addressed. In addition, the long range growth
projections for the County indicated that additional officers
would be needed in order to meet the demands for service in the
County.
In the fall of 1989, the Chief of Albemarle County Police
Department commissioned a Task Force, (see Appendix 1), to
address these issues through the development of a Skill
Proficiency Plan for police officers. The Task Force studied a
variety of models that existed in other localities and attempted
to meet the unique needs of a growing police force in Albemarle
County.
The Task Force drew from research that had been done on
programs in other professions. In doing so, the following
assumptions guided their work:
1) In order to be successful, the Skill Proficiency Plan
must be optional with no stigma for those police
officers who choose not to be part of the plan.
2) The basic salary schedule for Police Officers must
remain competitive. The Skill Proficiency Plan must not
be used to supplant an attractive salary for those
officers who are not participating in the plan.
3) The plan Qust not contain quotas. Any officer who
chooses to participate should have the opportunity if
the criteria are met.
4) The Skill Proficiency Plan should provide officers with
additional leadership, training and educational
responsibilities and incentives for excelling in
performance and training.
It is anticipated that the Albemarle COlJnty Police Officers
Skill Proficiency Plan as proposed by the Task Force will provide
a better motivated and more highly skilled corps of oEficers who
stand ready to meet the needs of our community.
,
.....
SKILL PATH OPTIONS
Research supports the fact that people, in order to
experience fulfillment in their careers, should be given the
opportunity to take expanding roles in decision making and
leadership. A number of professional responsibilities, over and
above the basic Police Officer job description, are present which
are necessary for the police force to meet its demands to fellow
off ice r s, the Co un t y g 0 v ern me nt, and the pub 1 i c . 0 f f ice r s
participating in the Skill Proficiency will constitute a pool of
professional expertise from which the Chief of Police may draw in
fulfilling these responsibilities. Examples of the
responsibilit~es include:
1) Serve as a mentor to new officers
2) Provide interdivision training
3) Fill in for supervisors on a temporary basis
4) Serve on departmental/County committees and task forces
5) Fulfill specialty assignments such as field training
officer, canine, evidence technician, etc.
The four skill levels for police officers are:
1) Police Officer I
2) Police Officer II
3) Senior Police Officer
4) Master Police Officer
For each level, criteria have been established in the
following areas:
1) Experience
2) Performance Evaluation
3) Preventable Accidents
4) Firearms Expertise
5) Mastery of Skill Areas, and
6) Physical Fitness
7) Education
The specific requirements are depicted in Figure (1)
"
POLICE
OFFICER I
FIGURE 1
PROGRAM CRITERIA
POLIC r;
OFFICER II
SENIOR
POLIO~ OFFICER
V' ..
MASTER
POLICE OFFICER
CRITERIA
( 1 )
Experience
LEVEL 1
3 years as a
police off.
(2 yrs. after
probation)
LEVEL II
6 years as a
police off.
LeVEL III
10 yea t"'s as a
police off.
LEVEL IV
15 years as a
police off.
Performance
Evaluation
85% average
on last 2
years of
evaluations
85% average
on Level I
evaluations
85% average
on Level II
evalu2tions
85% average
on Level III
evaluations
Accidents
(preventable)
not more than
5 1n 15 years
Fi rea rms
( 3 )
r'1as tery of
Sk i 11 <n...reas
Physical (2)
Fitness
Standards
not more than
1 in 3 yrs.
85
40 hours
train. course
in specialty
area. As
approved by
Department.
Active parti-
cipation as a
Department
liaison
officer with a
Neighborhood
Hatch Program.
Pass annual
physical
fitness
exam
not more than
2 in 6 yea rs
85
40 hours
advance train.
1n specialty
as approved by
Department.
4 5 h ou r firs t
responder
course
(certificate)
Must meet
Department's
physical Hell-
ness Program.
not more than
3 in 10 years
85
40 hou:-s
general
Instructors
certificate.
60 additional
hrs. of train.
select .2d from
Level III
approved
courses.
Teach Level I
II Courses
85
40 hours of
training
selected from
Leve 1 IV
approved
courses:
fill in as
1st line
supervisor
as needed.
Teach and
evaluate all
level courses
(1) Experience as a Police OfEicer may be credited for police work 1n
the military police, sheriff's department, etc. The Chief of
Police has the final authority in granting of credit for
previous experience.
(2) See physical wellness pro~cam manual for requirements.
....
..
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN
Since each skill proficiency contains a requirement for
mastery of certain skill areas, each police officer who intends
to apply for advancement must establish a plan for meeting these
requirements.
It is not sufficient to merely attend training. More
important officers must demonstrate that they have transferred
training into practice, i.e. that they have mastered the
particular area. Immediate supervisors will approve of the skill
proficiency plan for each officer. In developing the plan, the
supervisor and officer shall agree on the skill areas to be
covered, and the number of hours to be completed in each area.
In addition, the supervisor will judge whether or not the skill
area has been mastered based on the department's standards for
that skill area. Divisional commanders shall review and approve
all skill proficiency plans within their divisions. They will
also approve verification of mastery in each skill area.
TRANSITIONING OF NEH EXPERIE[~CED OFFICERS
It is recognized that attracting experienced officers to the
Albemarle County Police Force is desirable. Therefore, after two
years of successful experience in Albemarle County as a Police
Officer, individuals may be advanced to a skill proficiency level
commensurate with their total experience, provided they meet all
other criteria for that level.
PROCEDURES FOR ADV.l\NCEHEtJT
Officers who seek advancement on the Albemarle County Skill
Proficiency Plan shall be responsible for the following:
1) Completion of an application by November 1 of the year
preceding the year in which the advancement would take
effect.
2) Completion of the professional growth Dlan as set forth
by the immediate supervisor.
3) Submission of a file which contains evidence of meeting
the criteria for the advancement level, to include:
a. accident records
b. firearms records
c. phys ica 1 fitness records
d. attendance records
e. performance evaluations
. " -.
This portfolio will be submitted by December 1 to the
Chairman of the Professional Review Board. Successful candidates
will advance to the appropriate career-step effective July 1, and
will be provided with an insignia which designates their skill
level position.
PROFESSIONAL REVIEW BOARD
The Professional Review Board will consist of three officers
as follows:
a. Police Lieutenant
b. Police officer from patrol
c. Police officer from investigations
d. Human Resources Personnel
The two police officers will be chosen on an annual hasis to
serve for a one year term (July 1 - June 30). Officers who wish
to serve on the Board will complete a self-nomination form by May
1 and submit it to the Chief of Police, who will circulate a
ballot among all police officers. The officers receiving the
most votes will be appointed to the Board. The Board will elect
a chairman that will assure that the Board does the following:
1. reviews all applications/portfolios of Skill
Proficiency Plan applicants, and notifies the
candidate, the Chief of Police, and the Personnel
Office of the results of the review, within 10 days
of the Board review.
2. makes recommendations for the administration of the
plan.
3. sets standards for the training components and
advises the Training Officer on training
procedures/opportunities.
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
It is understood that officers involved in the Skill
Proficiency Plan must at all times maintain satisfactory
performance. If an officer falls below the County's criteria for
satisfactory performance on annual evaluations or below standards
within individual skill areas, they will be removed from the
Skill Proficiency Plan until the following year, when
satisfactory performance must he achieved. If at any time during
the year an is placed on a major plan of assistance, they will
also be removed from the Skill Proficiency Plan.
Questions regarding the Skill Proficiency Plan should be
addressed to the Chief or the Review Board. Appeals shall be
addressed through normal departmental procedur~s. Violations of
the procedural aspects of this plan may be directed throug~ the
County grievance procedure.
....
.. ......
Que s t ion s [(~ q a r r1 i n CJ t he Ski lJ Pro r: i c i co II C '/ P 1 a n s h 0 U 1 cl !J e
addressed to the Chier: or the Review Goard. Appeals shall he
a c1 d res :3 (~ d Lite () iJ g h nor r:1 a 1 d (:; par r. ;... e n tal L' roc e d u r to) ,:> . \' i 0 1 a t ion?, () r:
the procedural aspects of this plan nay be directed through tho
County grievance procedure.
"
.,... ...
--
Edward H. Bain. Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R Marshall. Jr
SCQllsville
David P. Bower:man
Charlottesville
Charles S Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
February 11, 1992
Ms. Lida Arnason
Director of Community Services
Jefferson Area Board for Aging
2300 Commonwealth Drive, Suite B-1
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Arnason:
Enclosed you will find the Memo-Of-Understanding between the
Meadows Community Center, Albemarle County Parks and Recreation and
Jefferson Area Board for Aging that was approved by the Board of
Supervisors at its meeting, February 5, 1992. Please sign the
agreement and return same to the undersigned.
Sincerely,
~,
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
LEN : bh
Enclosure
cc: Patrick K. Mullaney
",
..
...
MEMO-OF-UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
MEADOWS COMMUNITY CENTER
ALBEMARLE PARKS AND RECREATION
401 MCINTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
AND
JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING
2300 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE B-1
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
The Jefferson Area Board for Aging (JABA) will use the Meadows
Community Center located in Crozet for its base for delivering
homebound meals, for serving congregate meals to senior citizens of
Albemarle County and providing outreach.
JABA will use the kitchen, main room, and a designated office.
A JABA Care Manager will be using the office full-time weekdays
along with a part-time site Coordinator. JABA will provide office
furniture, supplies, a phone and fax lines.
JABA will utilize three Green Thumb Workers to receive
supplies, deliver homebound meals and prepare congregate services.
These Green Thumb workers will be supervised by JABA Care Manager
housed in the Meadows Community Center. When the Senior Site
Coordinator is hired, Green Thumb Workers will be supervised by
this new position.
The Green Thumb Workers will receive and store food and
supplies delivered each Tuesday. Packing and delivery of meals
will occur each week. A congregate meal will be served on the
second Tuesday of each month. As participation grows, a congregate
meal will be served once weekly. When program is fully enrolled,
JABA will offer a congregate meal with senior activities twice
weekly. The days will be negotiated with the County at that time.
The kitchen will be used to heat frozen dinners and for preparation
of the balance of the meal.
The Green Thumb Workers will prepare the Main Room for use by
setting up tables and chairs. They will also restore the Main Room
to its original condition by putting chairs and tables back in
storage, as well as, cleaning the kitchen, lavatories and floors.
JABA will use County tables and chairs stored at the Meadows
Community Center.
County will provide toilet paper and hand soap for the
restrooms.
JABA will provide a small refrigerator and freezer to be used
only for the homebound and congregat~ meals.
0>
PAGE 2
JABA will use the stove and sink in t.he kitchen area for
preparing congregate meals, and designated storage off of the
kitchen.
JABA agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the County of
Albemarle, its officers, agents and employees from any and all
costs arising out of claims brought as a result of negligence of
JABA, its officers, agents and employees in using the Meadows
Community Center for delivering homebound meals, serving congregate
meals and providing outreach for senior citizens. JABA further
agrees to name the County of Albemarle as an additional insured on
its general liability insurance policy.
Accepted and Agreed to:
Jefferson Area Board for Aging:
County of Albemarle:
aL/Vg~~
Date
~~~t, Iff2-
Date
\",
-" ..,-,. "'~ ..\'~d.,;~J~i<~
0;, . . I, Ai ' '? ,;J-
."."'.--..-,......:L.. ....~..-._...........____ - ... r 4 r .;;...;
. . '-" \ r.....'.r,"',~'
(~ r' -, ~.". ;,""'Ir'" '\ ~ ~ . '... '. ",' "" <" , ~~
;'....~ . ~_~. . '.\,,}; ," i., ...', ,~. t \; \ ".. \\.
" '. \. '\ ",':~'l
. '
, "
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
!l , '
\1' :
1" ,
t '
c ~ ~ ,."'
:I;,~S
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item I:
9) ,t)~t)S. '1;r
Title:
Memorandum of Understanding for JABA Use of Meadows
Community Center
Issue: The Jefferson Area Board for Aging is interested in using
the Meadows Community Center in Crozet for use as a meal site and
outreach for County Senior Citizens. A memorandum of understanding
is necessary to articulate responsibilities associated with the use
of the building.
Background: See attached memo.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the
Chairman to execute the attached memorandum of understanding on
behalf of Albemarle County.
Staff Contact(s): Messrs. Tucker and Huff.
RWT,Jr/dbm
92.029
Attachment
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Parks and Recreation Department
County Office Building
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5845
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard E. Huff, II. Deputy County Executive
FROM: Patrick K. Mullaney, Director, Parks & Recreationl~~
DATE: January 27, 1992
RE: JABA Use of Meadows Community Center
The Jefferson Area Board for Aging is interested in using the
Meadows Community Center in Crozet for its base for delivering
homebound meals, serving congregate meals and providing outreach
for County senior citizens.
When the Meadows complex was first developed, JABA managed the
community center. That responsibility was later turned over to the
County. It has always been the intent that the Meadows serve as a
center of activity for all the senior citizens in the western part
of the County and not solely the residents of the Meadows. The
outreach service, congregate meals and associated activities will
more than ever encourage this. The Meadows residents obviously
will benefit from this program also.
We do not anticipate charging a rental fee for this use as we
see this as an opportunity to augment our existing limited program
at a minimal expense to our departmental budget.
Enclosed please find a memorandum of understanding that has
been prepared for this use. This memorandum has been reviewed and
approved by the County Attorney's office. I recommend that the
County enter into this agreement to allow JABA to provide these
services.
PKM/sms
COUNTY OF ALE'
'C'
L'-
Enclosure
JAN ?R Fcn
~l
F~r:(;{ JTi\!E (lFFi CE
~
D"',~ ... ... _ '::J ;,',,:.',-::c.ro::
0;, ". (~}/:~~'':''7::.~-;-:':.:-. ,~
r t": "; _'.,"
)
. .. ,.' :.-..~,..'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901.4596
(804) 296-5841
_)!v{\L~ U.- ~~_I ,L-i:. .~tV[\S
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item :JI::
921()2d~-. 73..
Title: Solid Waste Report
Issue: Solid waste and recycling report.
Background: Late last year, you requested a solid waste staff
report on a number of issues; the curbside recycling program,
educational efforts, alternatives to landfilling and recycling, and
meeting and exceeding state recycling mandates.
Discussion: This report addresses each of these issues except for
the detailed cost/benefit comparisons of landfill alternatives
which is being evaluated by the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority. The
voluntary curbside program has just gotten underway and a
definitive evaluation cannot be made this soon, but expanding this
program is addressed.
While this update addresses Albemarle County's issues, many of the
recommendations and strategies will be an integrated effort to
support our Regional Solid Waste Management Plan.
Recommendation: Staff recommendations are included in the report
for your discussion and consideration.
Staff Contact(s): Messrs. Tucker and Brandenburger.
RWT,Jr/dbm
92.038
Attachment
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT - UPDATE
PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to supplement the Thomas Jefferson
Planning District Solid Waste Management Plan and to communicate
the issues related to the County's policies, functions, activities
and facilities for management of the municipal solid waste (MSW)
stream in the County. The report will serve the County as a guide
for discussing solid waste management as the County meets
legislative mandates, implements the regional plan and strives to
manage solid waste generated and/or disposed within its boundaries
in a manner which is environmentally sound and fiscally
responsible.
I . SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
A. Prior Studies/Programs
The Charlottesville-Albemarle Solid Waste Study of 1989 and the
Thomas Jefferson Regional Solid Waste Plan of 1991 provide
extensive data and analysis on the full range of waste stream
management alternatives. This report does not duplicate that
effort but will focus on how Albemarle County can best implement
the regional plan objectives in balance with our needs and
resources. The following factors have significant impact on any
solid waste management recommendation and are discussed here to
provide relevant information for evaluating these recommendations.
B. Waste Generation
A plan to target reduction of the solid waste stream requires
accurate data on the composition of the current waste stream and an
estimate of the future composition of this same waste stream. This
is particularly important in Albemarle County as the waste stream
is subject to significant change due to the County's continued
growth.
Of equal importance is being able to identify what type of waste is
generated and who generates it - specifically the residential,
commercial and industrial components. Knowing all these is
critical to developing a viable program to achieve the solid waste
goals of: (I) meeting mandates, (2) extending the life of the
landfill, and (3) improving environmental quality.
C. Data Limitations
Recent solid waste studies have captured only a part of this
information. Tonnage data is available from records at the Ivy
Landfill that identifies the landfilled component by jurisdiction
(Albemarle, Charlottesville and U.Va.) and by general type
(domestic, stumps, white goods, tires, brush, other). The data
-l-
does not identify where the domestic component (45.5% of our waste)
came from (i.e. residential, commercial or industrial) and does not
further identify domestic waste by type (yard waste, food waste,
trash, paper/cardboard, newspaper, glass, aluminum, metals, etc.).
Of further concern in developing a cost effective waste reduction
program is the dispersion pattern of waste generated between our
urban growth areas and the rural areas.
Since meeting state recycling mandates is based on the TJPDC
aggregate, the size of Albemarle County's waste stream is a
critical factor in supporting this effort. In 1989-90, Albemarle
County's landfilled waste represented 54.5% (145,377 tons) of the
Planning District's total. Cost effective programs of this
magnitude demand reasonable data. Improvements in our data are
necessary and will be pursued as part of program evaluations. The
following options are offered for consideration:
· Determine necessity for and conduct a waste stream
analysis.
· Develop a waste stream forecasting capability to
account for new business growth impacts, new
expanded residential growth, and changing waste
stream components.
II. COSTS
Reducing the waste stream through recycling is more costly than
landfilling. Current tip fees for domestic waste are $32/ton. The
revised tip fees may increase to $45-$50/ton for the operating and
capital needs to meet state regulations for the Ivy Landfill. The
cost to recycle can range from $60 to $200/ton depending on
collection methods, processing methods and the market. Recycling
costs are directly impacted by the market rates for recyclable
materials which are discussed in the next section. Recycling does
not generate profits. The full impact of recycling compared to
landfill is readily apparent: Albemarle's domestic waste in the
last II months was 38,589 tons, or $1,234,867 at $32/ton. State
mandate for 1995 requires 25% reduction through recycling.
Recycling 25% (9,647) at $60/ton cost $578,835 or a net cost
increase over landfilling of $270,127. While further efficiencies
in collection and processing can be pursued, it is unlikely these
efficiencies will ever result in a recycling program paying for
itself.
Action is underway to investigate processing and collection
alternatives. Rivanna Solid Waste Authority has initiated a study
of a regional Materials Recovery System (MRS). The results of this
should identify the best collection and processing alternatives to
support marketability. This study is expected to be completed in
late summer and will be incorporated in our program development.
-2-
I I I . RECYCLING COMPONENTS
A. Recycling Mandates
The State mandates a recycling rate of 10% in 1991, 15% in 1993 and
25% in 1995 of the total household wastes and principal recyclable
materials (wastes generated by non-household sources, i.e.,
commercial or industrial). The regional plan indicated that TJPD
had attained an 11.4% rate as of July I, 1991. TJPD is compiling
the FY '91 data and recent efforts by the City, University of
Virginia, and County should have a significant impact.
B. Markets
Recycling mandates throughout the country are creating a glut in
recyclables. Thus, there is little or no revenue to the County
from recyclables except for aluminum. This is a highly volatile
market and is expected to remain so for some time. Until there is
a demand for products made from recyclables, or government action
dictates such demand, the private sector's commitment to making
products from recyclables will lag. Our best efforts to enhance
marketability will lie in:
(I) providing quality recyclables to processors/markets
(uncontaminated),
(2) consolidating with other localities/agencies to increase
market volume and increase leverage with processors/market
buyers,
(3) influence the business, public and state, to require
purchase of products made from recycled material, packaged
with reduced material, or purchase only recyclable products.
The current market for recyclables is as follows:
Markets
Cost Per Ton* Profit
Drop-Off Center End User Generated
Paper
Newsprint 0-5 15 No
White Ledger 20 197 No
Mixed newsprint (20) 15 No
Computer Paper 60 170 No
Corrugated 10 30 No
Glass
Green (23) 15 No
Other 0 50 No
-3-
.
Cost Per Ton* Profit
Drop-Off Center End User Generated
Plastic
Clear #l & #2 (150) 15 No
Aluminum 440 680 Yes/No
Tin 0 44 No
* Does not include collection, processing or
freight. End User costs are potential prices
if the MRS becomes a reality.
Albemarle County cannot achieve a 25% reduction in our waste stream
by targeting only a curbside household recycling program. The
current voluntary curbside collection program is estimated to
achieve an 11-12% recycling rate. This assumes:
(I) a 20% participation rate from people who have to pay for
some part of recycling,
( 2) 70% of the recyclable waste stream collected (capture
rate) ,
(3) 16,000 of the 24,433 residences are served by private
haulers, and
(4) all haulers offer the service.
If the program were mandatory, 100% was captured and newspapers
were added, the recycling rate would be about 18-20%. Thus, a
curbside program, in any form, isn't enough to meet mandates for
two reasons - over 8,000 households aren't served by the current
curbside program and the recycling conducted by the
commercial/industrial sectors hasn-t been accounted for and
encouraged.
C. Current Curbside Program
The County's voluntary curbside program is just underway and
preliminary data, usage, lessons learned are not yet available to
assess the program. A cominglied curbside program is still
supported as the best way to maximize citizen participation. The
estimated program cost for FY 92/93 is $65,978 or $88/ton. This
program should continue while we assess the need to expand the
products recovered (currently do not accept newspaper) and the
impact of serving all households. Adding newspapers to the current
curbside program would cost approximately an additional $19, 080 for
a total of $85,058 or $52/ton. The feasibility of private trash
-4-
'"
collectors providing this service needs to be determined. Of the
22 private refuse collectors operating in Albemarle County, four
participated in the initial pilot program that started last
November. As of January, 17% (698 of 4,116) of their customers are
using the recycling service. Also, effective January I, the
service was expanded to all private refuse collectors in an effort
to reach the approximately 16,000 residential customers served by
them.
D. Non-Served Households
The estimated 8,400 households not served by private collectors do
so because they elect to manage their own refuse. They may not be
able to get service, or they cannot get service at an acceptable
rate. In any case, recycling service needs to be provided to these
8,433 residents. Alternatives to consider are:
· Drop-off center at the Ivy Landfill: Drop-off at
Ivy Landfill for FY 93 would cost about $16,649 or
$49/ton to operate a source separated program for
glass, jars, aluminum, tin, see-through #l and #2
plastics and mixed paper. This would provide
service for citizens who do not use private
service.
· Drop-off centers at other areas of the County on a
permanent or rotating basis: Costs for the Crozet
project were expected to approach $12,000 or 100-
200/ton for FY 93. This program may fill a need
for service not provided by private collectors, the
McIntire drop-off or the Ivy drop-off. It is
recommended the expanded curbside and Ivy programs
be instituted and evaluated before implementing a
roving or regional drop-off program. Staff will
develop a program design and bid package if such a
program is desired or warranted.
· Mandated curbside service for all residents. This
could be achieved by private collectors, through
contract, provided by public government or through
a service district.
E. Commercial/lndustrial/Non-Household
A recent Chamber of Commerce/League of Women Voters survey of
businesses with 15+ employees (30% replied) indicate:
· 65% have a recycling program in place,
· 77% not participating are unsure of what to do,
-5-
· 59% with a program have storage problems,
· 92% practice source reduction
· 62% want to work together in a cooperative program
· 54% are unwilling to fund a position to help
coordinate a program.
As commercial/industrial recycling can be included in meeting
mandates, and in light of the above survey, the TJPDC sent a
request to 578 businesses in the district (225 in Albemarle County)
seeking data on what they recycled in CY 1991. Only 13 County
businesses replied, (5.6%), but these 13 reported 1,684 tons of
recycled material.
There is the potential for significant impact on meeting State
mandates through the business sector without having them do more
than they are already. Getting their data is critical to assessing
their impact on our ability to meet mandates. In addition,
providing support in education and assistance to initiate new and
expanded recycling in the business sector appears to be warranted.
The imposition of an ordinance to require annual reporting may be
necessary if efforts at voluntary reporting are unsuccessful. The
minimal cost to a business to report their recycling efforts far
outweighs the spending of taxpayer dollars in implementing more
aggressive household or business programs.
· An example of business use is the collection of
used oil by service stations, automotive service
centers, fleet operators, etc. The oil can be used
to meet State mandates whether the oil is collected
for recycling or reused for fuel.
· Abandoned vehicles are another source of continued
recycling in lieu of expanded household programs.
Since this source may dry up in time, it must be
evaluated each year as a component to the waste
stream.
IV. EXTENDING LANDFILL LIFE
The discussion thus far has focused on meeting State mandates.
Equally important is a need to extend the life of the landfill.
While State mandates can be met without a mandated household
recycling program, such a program may be warranted to achieve the
goal of extending the life of the landfill and improving
environmental preservation/protection.
A. Landfill Alternatives
In addition to recycling, reducing the landfill waste stream can be
-6-
achieved by reuse, reduction, composting, or resource recovery.
All have various cost/benefits and feasibility thresholds. The
Thomas Jefferson Planning District regional plan identified
initiatives in the area of reuse/reduction and the following
options are discussed again in terms of Albemarle County:
Reuse/Reduction
· Initiate joint procurement procedures for equipment
and supplies for Albemarle County and Schools that
focus on reduction and recycled material.
· Continue to coordinate joint procurement within the
community, and expand to the region and state.
· Continue procurement of products made from recycled
material. County/School pursue establishing annual
goals and budget accordingly.
B. Composting of Yard Waste
Yard waste can represent 12-18% of the waste stream. For Albemarle
County, this would be applicable in the urban area or areas of high
residential density that are not amenable to composting on their
property. While the actual tonnage may be small, the mechanics to
collect and recycle yard waste are available in the area.
Since the State is mandating new yard waste composting regulations
for 1995, the City of Charlottesville has undertaken a review of
their current composting facility and alternatives. Albemarle
County plans to consider the following composting alternatives with
the City and RSWA.
· Develop a program through RSWA for residential
composting.
· Implement a total ban on burning in the
urban/growth areas to encourage on-site composting
or yard waste collection in conjunction with the
City/RSWA program.
.
Investigate yard waste
including expansion of
urban/growth areas.
collection
Ci ty service
services
to the
· Continue to investigate with RSWA and the private
sector the potential recycling of stumps and brush.
C. Resource Recovery
Waste-to-energy alternatives will be reviewed by RSWA in the near
future. Studies prior to 1989 indicate these alternatives were not
-7-
economically feasible. The increase in landfill
operation/closure/siting costs make it prudent to evaluate waste-
to-energy again. This is especially important as an integrated
waste stream management program of recycling, composting, and MRS
can have a significant impact on one of the most critical variables
in a waste-to-energy program, i. e., available tonnage of waste
going into the waste-to-energy plant. While regulations and
mandates are driving up the costs of landfills, there is an equal
and maybe more dynamic regulatory environment underway regarding
waste-to-energy in terms of environmentally safe operation and
disposal. This analysis will not be completed until later in CY
'92.
V. EDUCATION
Without a focused and directed solid waste management program, it
is counter-productive to develop a comprehensive education program
other than generic issues and information. Time, money and energy
can be best spent once our direction is established. Once
strategies such as: (I) a coordinated business/household
management program, (2) an aggressive program within the County and
County Schools, (3) yard waste collection and on-site composting,
(4) support of business needs, and (5) consortium/regional efforts
have been developed, the education specialist currently being
considered by RSWA would support City and County needs and work
closely with CART and other interested groups in coordinating our
education efforts.
VI . RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Phase I (April I, 1992)
· Determine private sector data collection
requirements. Develop an ordinance to require
private sector reporting of recycling if warranted.
· Request RSWA investigate joint market contracts
with the City, University of Virginia and the other
public or private sector firms.
· Continue County reuse/reduction efforts and provide
recommendations for further initiatives.
B. Phase II (July I, 1992)
· Expand funding of voluntary curbside program to
include newspapers after determining feasibility
with private collectors.
· Provide and fund an Ivy drop-off collection
center.
-8-
..
· Request RSWA determine the need and, if warranted,
develop a waste stream forecasting capability.
· Complete evaluation of the voluntary curbside
collection program and make recommended changes.
· Evaluate necessity for mandatory recycling.
· Evaluate private sector recycling impact on
attainment of State mandates.
· Develop a yardwaste collection plan in conjunction
with the City and RSWA.
· Evaluate the need for a roving drop-off program or
area drop-off centers.
· Evaluate alternative methods for providing curbside
collection service to include, but not limited to:
- private collection
- contract with private sector
public sector collection (in whole or in part)
- service district
· Complete evaluation of chipping and composting
stumps and brush.
· Develop and implement integrated education
strategies for the total waste stream in
consultation with the City, RSWA, School Divisions,
University of Virginia, CART, private sector and
other interested groups.
C. Phase III (As necessary)
· Complete evaluation of MRS and resource recovery
alternatives.
RBB/dbm
92.005
-9-
.
~
-,<...",.1'
Edward H Bain, Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S Martm
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
DATE:
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~~
February 6, 1992
MEMO TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Reappropriation/Appropriations - Approved/Requested
Attached is the signed appropriation forms which were approved
by the Board at the February 5, 1992 meeting.
Crozet Crossing CDBG Grant - #910023;
Keene Landfill - #910022;
Adjustment of Revenues based on finalizing VPSA Bond Issue and
Sale of Fourth Street Property - #910011.
Please provide the appropriation form to transfer $10,000 in
unused funds from the United Way child care scholarship teen mother
program to the fee-based child care program administered by the
Department of Social Services for the current fiscal year.
LEN:bwh
Attachments (3)
cc: Roxanne White
Robert paskel
Robert J. Walters, Jr.
Rick Huff
Karen Morris
Bob Brandenburger
...
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR 91/92 NUMBER 910022
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES
NO X
FUND CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR KEENE LANDFILL.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900041000950059 KEENE LANDFILL $745,400.00
TOTAL
$745,400.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900051000510100 FUND BALANCE $745,400.00
TOTAL
$745,400.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
~~/
DATE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
/_"It~-7:Z
/'~/-j'~
..
"
,-'
","'
COUNty Of AkBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntirE! Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4896
Telephone (804) 296.5855
.",.
,;'
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
TO:
DATE:
January 24, 1992
RE:
Reappropriation - Crozet Crossing CDBG Grant
Attached is an appropriation request for the Crozet Crossing
Affordable Housing Project. This grant was originally awarded for
$600,000 ($300,000 CDBG funds, $300,000 local match). The County
appropriated and transferred $40,000 during the 1990/91 fiscal year
leaving the grant balance of $560,000 to be appropriated for FY
1991/92. The remaining County share of $260,000 will be
transferred from the General Fund Balance.
Attachment
cc: David B. Benish
Robert J. Walters, Jr.
COUNTY OF P,LE
Lt.
J.f.\N ~:q
..
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910011
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
LOCAL SHARE OF CROZET CROSSINGS GRANT PROJECT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100093010930205
TRANSFER TO CDBG-CROZET CROSSINGS
$260,000.00
1122481027563120
CROZET CROSSINGS
560,000.00
TOTAL
$820,000.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100051000510100 GENERAL FUND BALANCE $260,000.00
2122433000330082
2122451000512004
GRANT PROCEEDS-EDBG-CROZET CROSSINGS
TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND
300,000.00
260,000.00
TOTAL
$820,000.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~~<L/
/-,;2 ~-7'z..
~ -/ -:YL---
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
D' t 'b t d t B ,.1. //~/''i;;''-
IS n u e 0 oart!. .
/' . q---
'1.2, 0,;2 o~ -, /'..S
Ag(m[~'l ~Item, }Jo. ." ; ,- ~ r:
".,
~,.~. .-. r~,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
U I...:. _....
C f~ ~-~
ii.~ 6)>
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert w. Tucker , Jr. , County Executive
FROM: Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
DATE: January 27, 1992
RE: Appropriation - CIP - Keene Landfill
Due to the establishment of the Solid Waste Authority, funds
which had been appropriated for the Ivy Landfill remained
unexpended at June 30, 1991 in the amount of $745,400.
It was my understanding that this money was to be transferred
to the Keene Landfill Closure Project. This appropriation was
anticipated in the proposed funding required in the 1992-93 CIP and
will not alter the funding recommended in that adopted plan. In
order to accomplish this I have attached appropriation form #910022
which requires Board of Supervisor approval.
MAB/bs
Attachment
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR 91/92 NUMBER 910022
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES
NO X
FUND CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR KEENE LANDFILL.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900041000950059 KEENE LANDFILL $745,400.00
TOTAL
$745,400.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900051000510100 FUND BALANCE $745,400.00
TOTAL
$745,400.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
~~~
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
./-~~-7Z
/--:7 -j'v---
MOTION: Mr. Bain
SECOND: Mrs. Humphris
MEETING DATE: February 5, 1992
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has
convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1
requires a certification by the
Supervisors that such executive
conformity with Virginia law;
of the Code of Virginia
Albemarle County Board of
meeting was conducted in
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, ( i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.
VOTE:
AYES:
Mr. Bain, Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris, Mr. Martin
and Mr. Perkins.
NAYS:
None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE:
ABSENT DURING MEETING:
Mr. Marshall
Mr. Marshall
! /L-." V:l1 0
'aJt1t..(,-la) f4 M~(42
Deputy Clerk, Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
r-':sl-bl""'\ t", ~,,~,(]t, / -~I "lL
IJt ~t: .t......~ '.;' .~~........d. .
c? 'J 0 d2 c;.' .::,.:..:.t /~
/lgenda Item No. . '/ eX. . ~
" 11";-'
..." :'Jf\,
_- ,.,.-'o";lq:<Jlt
"} ~~
it
.'
i.) :) i i
l
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901.4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
'"
:~ t!:
.~, "-~ .;,_:;::.~
. "." (, I
, ; ::.; tj ;\I~.1
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
TO:
DATE:
January 27, 1992
RE:
CIP Revenues
Based on the 1991B VPSA Bond Issue which totaled $16,070,000
the CIP revenue estimates need to be adjusted. The Bonds issued
exceeded the original projection by $824,953.24
In addition, sale of the 4th street property projected in FY
1991/92 was actually received in FY 1990/91. The FY 1991/92 budget
projection of $50,000 needs to be to zero.
These two actions result in an adjustment to the CIP Fund
Balance of $774,953.24.
Approval of the Board of Supervisors of attached appropriation
form #910023 is requested.
MAB/bs
Attachment
COUNTY OF AL8Erl/\RLE.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910023
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADJUSTMENT OF REVENUES BASED ON FINALIZING VPSA BOND ISSUE AND SALE
OF 4TH STREET PROPERTY.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900015000150210
2900041000410306
2900051000510100
SALE OF REAL ESTATE
VPSA BONDS-91B
FUND BALANCE
($50,000.00)
824,953.24
(774,953.24)
TOTAL
$0.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~ /-.;z~ -~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .,2.-- /~~
Dis,tributed tv BC3rd: / - ? /. '1~
fi.genda Item No, 1;:;. &..2 os', 7--1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE CO.P'-.'f....c: ",-, t
.,j:,C:f~l,::<_~ \;
'. .-' ~ '" .
:;: ',)1-' .;~ '\ ,/ j ::> W ..'
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ~~
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive I
January 31, 1992
FY 91-92 and FY 92-93 Revenue Projections
The Department of Finance has just completed their mid-year
review of projected revenues for both the current year and FY 92-93
and despite the gloomy economic climate, the overall revenue
picture looks good.
For the current year, overall revenues are projected to be
over budget by approximately 1.2%. The majority of this increase
is due to a better than anticipated collection rate on real estate
taxes. Personal property is also over projection, primarily due to
the difficulty of accurately estimating the revenue collection in
the first full year of split billing and proration.
From these updated figures, I feel confident that our current
fiscal year operating budget will be in balance. We should not
experience the shortfall in revenues we did in FY 90-91. For these
reasons, I recommend reducing the 5% freeze imposed on County
departments and agencies in anticipation of a revenue shortfall in
the current year to a l% freeze and that agencies be exempted from
this holdback. This l% should give a necessary cushion should
revenues take an unexpected downward turn in the last five months
of the fiscal year.
With regard to FY 92-93 budget projections, the attached sheet
shows both the October and the January estimates of available
revenues. The variance between the two estimates provides $465,750
in additional revenues for FY 92-93. The majority of these
increased revenues are due to a higher than expected real estate
collection, underestimated personal property from split billing and
proration estimates, and an increased machinery and tools tax
collection. It should be noted that although it appears that there
may be additional revenues available, baseline FY 92-93 budget
requests and required expendi tures are exceeding general
government's revenue allocation by more than $250,000 according to
very preliminary budget discussions. Requests for additional
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
January 31, 1992
RE: FY 91-92 and FY 92-93 Revenue Projections
Page 2
foster care funds, which is a mandated service, as well as
attempting to provide funds for such initiatives as solid waste,
Northside Library operations, and deep cuts at the state level for
popular services and programs (constitutional officers' budgets,
library, gypsy moth, VPI Extension Service) will require careful
prioritization as we work through the budget process.
There are several options for the additional FY 92-93 revenues
at this point in the budgeting process. One option is to divide
the additional refund dollars between the schools and general
government based on the 60% to 40% split. This would provide an
additional $279,450 to the schools and $186,300 to general
government. A second option is to retain the total $465,750 in a
contingency fund to be used at your discretion during budget
worksessions. A third option would be a combination wi th only part
of the additional revenues retained as a board reserve. At this
point in the budget process, it may be prudent for the Board to
retain the total amount until you can assess and prioritize total
funding needs.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
RWT,Jr/RWW/bat
92.040
FY 1992-93 ALBEMARLE COUNTY GENERAL OPERATING FUND
PRELIMINARY REVENUE ESTIMATE
OCTOBER PROJECTION
INCREASE IN DOLLARS
OVER 1991-92
JANUARY PROJECTION ADDITIONAL
INCREASE IN DOLLARS REVENUES
OVER 1991-92 AVAILABLE
CHANGE IN REVENUES OVER 92/93
PROPERTY TAX REVENUES
OTHER LOCAL REVENUES
ST ATE/FEDERAL REVENUES
FUND BALANCE
NET REVENUE INCREASE
$1,815,000
$846,200
($12,400)
($242,500)
$2,406,300
$2,343,700
$746,200
$83,650
($242,500)
$2,931,050
$528,700
($100,000)
$96,050
~
$524,750
COMMITED EXPENDITURES
DEBT SERVICE $774,000 $833,000 $59,000
REVENUE SHARING $148.650 $148.650 ~
TOTAL COMMITTED EXPENDITURES $922,650 $981,650 $59,000
NET A V AILABLE REVENUE $1,483,650 $1,949,400 $465,750
lUDSUM92.WK1 01127/92
!\j -L.:ZL-7-..J.::..-
(}.2., CJ~<.J.J: 77
,~__ _,.' ~ __.. ,_..~_..._,~.._~..__.-",,';J>
: " ~.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
::OU_N~~~ OF ALBEMARLE'
;::;-)1 r.,:::J. ~ r-' - "'1
, I I ~ (",.,. \ .....,. 1 ,'" ,..,. ,.........., '-0
u &,.)_.,...'..,-".."."..... ".' ."" "".l,.l.~l /. n
. " i ! ,\ \' n n . - .. . \ : , !
',' l \, ' '~ 1Ji.l'lt'.I,_') Ii l' l
: \, '-.\ I ., ,~ l ,I ~ :~:
'\ :";:::';';,,. . ,/ :! i I
..,., : ,.. ;;. L.:'J
\)/\;;:0 c. ,~,"'::' L.;;VI~;OqS
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
DATE: January 29, 1992
RE: FY 92/93 School Budget
Attached is a copy of the overview section of the FY 92/93 School
Budget providing assumptions, objectives and strategies for
building their budget. The overview also provides a listing of
those budget requests that were not funded in this year's budget.
It appears that the School Administration has proposed a budget
which funds many of the major objectives of the School Board.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
RWT,Jr/dbm
92.032
Attachment
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY OPERATING BUDGET
ASSUMPTIONS
INSTRUCTION
. NUMBER OF APPROVED POSITIONS WILL BE ADHERED TO
. ENROLLMENT GROWTH OF 326 STUDENTS IS ANTICIPATED
. STAFFING GUIDELINES AND OVERALL PUPIL TEACHER RATIOS WILL REMAIN THE SAME
AS PREVIOUS YEARS
. SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS WILL BE SERVED IN THEIR HOME SCHOOLS
WHENEVER POSSIBLE
. APPLIED ACADEMICS WILL BE CONTINUED IN THE HIGH SCHOOLS,
OPERATIONS
. THE SCHOOL DIVISION WILL OPERATE WITHIN THE FY 1992-93 BUDGET
APPROPRIATIONS
. STATE AND LOCAL REVENUE WILL MEET PROJECTED LEVELS (ASSUMES FULL FUNDING
OF STATE BASIC AID)
. PARITY AMONG SCHOOLS WILL BE MAINTAINED
. AGNOR.HURT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WILL OPEN IN AUGUST 1992
. AGNOR-HURT ELEMENTARY WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON BOTH
FINANCIAL AND HUMAN RESOURCES (APPROX $1.0 MILLION)
. BUS REPLACEMENT EFFORT WILL BE BASED ON A 12 YEAR CYCLE.
. AN ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONSERVATION INITIATIVE WILL BE IMPLEMENTED
IN ALL SCHOOLS
. FUEL ESTIMATE WILL BE BASED ON $.85 PER GALLON
. A PORTION OF ALL DISCRETIONARY FUNDS WILL BE KEPT IN RESERVE TO PROTECT
AGAINST CHANGES IN FISCAL STATUS DURING THE YEAR
STAFFING / EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
. FY 1992-93 WILL BE THE FIRST FULL YEAR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SPRING 1991
SALARY SURVEY.
. PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PROGRAM WILL BE FUNDED
. TEACHER SALARY SCALE MOVEMENT / CLASSIFIED / ADMINISTRATIVE VESTING
. EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION FOR HEALTH CARE WILL INCREASE TO COVER
INCREASE IN PREMIUM (MID-LEVEL PLAN) FOR FY 1992-93
. PROFESSIONAL VRS RATE OF 12.68%, NON-PROFESSIONAL 9.16%
. FICA RATE OF 7.65% AND PROFESSIONAL LIFE INSURANCE RATE OF 9.471%
...
Page A 1
1/27/92
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY OPERATING BUDGET
OBJECTIVES
. INCREASE THE OVERALL TEACHER SALARY SCALE AND ADJUST THE FLAT PORTIONS
OF THE SCALE AS WELL AS THE TOP STEP OF THE SCALE.
. LATERAL SCALE MOVEMENT(TOWARDS MIDPOINT) FOR EMPLOYEES ON THE
COUNTY PAY SCALE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SALARY SURVEY
. IMPLEMENT RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE
. ELIMINATE POSSIBILITY OF ANOTHER REDUCTION IN FORCE
. REINSTATE A PORTION OF THE FUNDING FOR THE POSITIONS REDUCED IN FY 1991-92
. REINSTATE A PORTION OF THE STAFF DEVELOPMENT AND SUMMER SCHOOL
FUNDS TAKEN OUT OF THE FY 1991-92 OPERATING BUDGET
STRATEGIES
. INCREASE TEACHER SALARY SCALE - $500 ACROSS ENTIRE SCALE AND
AND AN ADDITIONAL $500 ATTHE TOP OF THE SCALE
. INCREASE MERIT POOL FROM 4% TO 5% TO ALLOW HIGH PERFORMING
EMPLOYEES TO VEST MORE THAN ONE STEP
. LIMIT THE INCREASE IN BASE BUDGET REQUESTS AND LEASE PURCHASE BUSES
TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR:
RECYCLING INITIATIVE
REINSTATEMENT OF 3 RIF POSITIONS
STAFF DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SCHOOL
$20,250
$99,549
$62,000
$100,000
"
Page A2
1/27/92
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY BUDGET REDUCTIONS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY BUDGET REQUEST
EXERCISE PAYROLL LAPSE FACTOR
SAVINGS DUE TO LEASE PURCHASE OF 1 ADDITIONAL AND 18 REPLACEMENT BUSES
POSTPONE PURCHASE OF COMPUTERIZED FUEL DISPENSING SYSTEM
POSTPONE PURCHASE OF CENTRAL OFFICE NETWORK HARDWARE
REDUCTION IN PERSONNEL SERVICES
ELIMINATE MAIL COURIER POSITION
POSTPONE REPLACEMENT OF MEDIA COURIER VAN
POSTPONE PURCHASE OF INSTRUCTIONAL EQUIPMENT
POSTPONE IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW STAFFING GUIDELINES (TEACHERS & CLERICAL)
POSTPONE FUNDING FOR CORRECTION OF THE SALARY COMPRESSION FACTOR
FOR CLASSIFIED AND ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES
POSTPONE FUNDING OF ADDITIONAL FY 1992-93 STAFFING REQUESTS
IFY 1992-93 BUDGET
FY 1991-92 REDUCTIONS (STILL UNFUNDED)
REDUCTION IN FORCE (35 POSITIONS)
ELIMINATE TEACHER VOUCHERS
ELIMINATE PROJECT EXCELLENCE AND S.LP.
REDUCE FUNDING FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION TUITION
REDUCE EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATION COST CENTER
REDUCE DISCRETIONARY NON-SCHOOL ACCOUNTS (10%)
INSTITUTE DOUBLE BUS RUN AT CALE AND GREER
CHANGE BUS REPLACEMENT EFFQRT FROM 10 TO 12 YEAR CYCLE
REDUCE GAS PRICE ESTIMATE FROM $,90 TO $.85 PER GALLON
SAVINGS DUE TO THE LEASE PURCHASE OF 24 NEW AND REPLACEMENT BUSES
Page A 3
($280,000)
($536,250)
($30,000)
($13,000)
($23,189)
($19,222)
($12,000)
($141,477)
($824,900)
($49,689)
($205,433)
($2,135,160
($1,142,215)
($70,000)
($35,000)
($40,000)
($5,000)
($44,435)
($20,660)
($147,000)
($25,000)
($876,250)
..
1/27/92
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY BUDGET REDUCTIONS
FY 1991-92 REDUCTIONS (CONTINUED)
ELIMINATE FOOD SERVICE TRANSFER ($40,000)
REDUCE STAFF DEVELOPMENT ($50,000)
REDUCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-CONSULTANTS ($35,000)
POSTPONE PURCHASE OF FOUR-WHEEL-DRIVE VEHICLES ($30,500)
REDUCE EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES (10%) ($9,646)
REDUCE ADVERTISING EXPENDITURES ($10,000)
REDUCE OUT-OF-STATE RECRUITMENT TRAVEL EXPENSES ($1,500)
REDUCE CENTRAL OFFICE INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES ($51,008)
REDUCE CENTRAL OFFICE TRAVEL ALLOCATIONS ($10,000)
REDUCE BUILDING SERVICES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES ($5,200)
ELIMINATE 1 REQUESTED MECHANIC POSITION (INCLUDES FRINGE) ($21,493)
SAVINGS DUE TO THE LEASE PURCHASE OF DATA PROCESSING ($63,980)
AND SCHOOL-BASED EQUIPMENT
IFY 1991-92 BUDGET ($2,733,887)
ITOTAL FY 1992-93 BUDGET REDUCTIONS ($4,869,046)1
"
Page A 4
1/27/92
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 GROWTH REQUEST
PROJECTED COSTS: ADDITIONAL 326 STUDENTS
RECURRING
TEACHERS - REGULAR EDUCATION (13)
TEACHERS - SPECIAL EDUCATION (2.5)
TEACHER ASSISTANTS - SPECIAL ED. (2)
BUS DRIVERS (5)
BUS - FUEL AND SUPPLIES
UTILITIES - ALBEMARLE HIGH SCHOOL
MATERIALS/SUPPLIES -ALBEMARLE H,S.
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES - ALBEMARLE H,S,
CUSTODIANS (2)
FACILITIES - EQUIPMENT
CLASSROOM FURNISHINGS
SCHOOL-BASED ALLOCATIONS
$433,857
$80,049
$27,008
$47,653
$30,557
$20,000
$3,000
$3,1 00
$33,360
$60,554
TOTAL GROWTH COSTS
$739,138
PROJECTED COSTS: AGNOR-HURT ELEMENTARY
TEACHERS - REGULAR EDUCATION (6)
TEACHER ASSISTANT - REGULAR ED. (3)
PRINCIPAL
GUIDANCE COUNSELOR
LIBRARIAN
OFFICE PERSONNEL (2)
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES
START-UP SPECIAL ED. MATERIALS
INSTRUCTIONAL NETWORK
LIBRARY NETWORK
SCHOOL OFFICE COMPUTERS
LIBRARY BOOKS
LIBRARY EQUIPMENT
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
INSURANCE
BUS DRIVER
BUS AND RADIO
UTILITIES
CUSTODIANS (4)
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
FACILITIES EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
FACILITIES - START-UP MATERIALS
FACILITIES - PEST CONTROL
$209,370
$39,624
$54,973
$38,015
$39,348
$35,172
$7,573
$10,331
$79,610
$69,009
$10,475
$4,000
$400
TOTAL AGNOR-HURT
$597,900
TOTAL GROWTH AND
AGNOR-HURT
$1,337,038
1/26/92
Page B1
NONRECURRING
$1,000
$18,500
$12.000
$31 ,500
$31 ,250
$12,250
$59,757
$9,728
$8,651
$85,680
$42,660
$15,170
$9,910
$9,750
$3,200
$288,006
$319,506
(f)
..J
o
o
:I:
U
(f)
U
..J
m
::J
0..
>
~
Z
::J
o
U
W
..J
a::
<(
:E
w
m
..J
<(
C\J
O'l
C
cU
-:l
r-:...
C\J
2
0C\l...-l
a:0'l<(
u.":"z
-:Lu 8l.t)
......~ .....
-:z...a:
<(>---:0
-:I U. ...
....-:0
...... ... .---.........
.........,-.......-...-..
.......... .........
....................
.-.-..................
........---...........
...----....,.,--.......
..........-..-_..-.-.....
......-............-.....
......-..._- --- ........
..'.>>0.-::-::::
.............~....~.....~..
-::::::,.....0:>:
>..&...~d.~..
..... ....-.............
.........--_....-........
..........--.............
..........--.-_...-....
.......................
. .. .... ........
o
LULU
f-::::>
oz
LULU
C\J(3Gj
~a:a:
'-0...
O'l
O'l
>--0
ll.LULU
f-::::>
<(z
o...LU
0>
f-LU
za:
<(
o
o
o
o
,-
C')
N..
o
a...
I
(j)
0:
W
CO
2
LU
2
>-
-l
<
o
LU
~
<(
0:
w
>
<(
W
::J
Z
W
>
w
a:
LL
o
en
w
()
a:
::J
o
en
l.{)
~
l'-
~
r-
~
f::F7
l.{)
co
l.{)
l.{)
r-
~
f::F7
(f)
.....J
o
o
I
o
(f)
.....J
et
o
o
.....J
r-
o
l'-
C"')
<.0
m
l'-
r-
f::F7
l.{)
l.{)
l.{)
m
l.{)
~
m
r-
f::F7
w
::>
z
w
>
w
0::
w
I-
et
I-
(f)
..
..
..
~
r-
C"')
C"')
C"')
~
f::F7
m
~
l'-
C\I
l.{)
<.0
m
o
l.{)
-.:i
<.0
~
o
l.{)
f::F7
r-
C"')
f::F7
~
r-
C"')
C"')
C"')
~
f::F7
C\I
co
r-
<.0
C"')
<.0
C"')
<.0
~
r-
l'-
l'-
-
r-
C"')
f::F7
-
r-
l.{)
f::F7
w
::>
z
w
>
w
0::
.....J
et
0::
w
o
W
LL
(f)
0::
w
LL
(f)
Z
et
0::
I-
.....J
et
o
o
.....J
>--
CO
LU
::::>
2
w
>
LU
a:
C')
O'l
N
O'l
O'l
>-
ll.
~
2
a
::::>
o
LU
0:
(j)
LU
f-
<(
a:
a:
LU
~
o
-l
LU
I
f-
2
o
o
LU
(j)
<(
CO
~
(j)
a:
>
2
o
f-
Z
W
~
W
(j)
a:
::::>
co
~
w
a:
LU
~
f-
(j)
'2
vO
0:3
2~
00
~ .
w'-
~(fi
X
(/)0
f-o:
0...0...
::::>0...
(j)<(
o
2
<(
(j)
o
2
::::>
ll.
(j)
2
~
a:
LU
a...
-l
a:
<(
a
a:
o
ll.
(j)
LU
o
f-
a
~w
0...::::>
~2
2~
f-LU
2a:
::::>w
Of-
0<(
01-
<((/)
22
wO:
~O
2ll.
<(0
Iw
al-
(j)2
1-::::>
00
wO
-l0
ll.<(
w>--
O:-l
(j)a:
OW
2~
::::>0:
ll.O
-lll.
<(-
a: I-
LU2
0<(
wO:
ll.~
2-l
wg
(/)I
<(a
WCJ)
O:w
00:
20...
r-i
QJ
Q'\
ro
0..
,-
O'l
O'l
I.()
0:
W
CO
~
W
>
o
2
o
W
~
o
o
~
w
~
w
>
F
::::>
o
w
x
w
>-
I-
2
::::>
o
o
..
..
..
/(1 Ct;,/Ujj(j- -Ll- ~ /l;; ~
>::IN
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY
OPERATING BUDGET
SUMMARY
FEBRUARY 5, 1992
CONTENTS:
1. FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY OPERATING BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS
2. FY 1992-93 REVENUE ESTIMATES
3. FY 1992-93 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
4. FY 1992-93 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
5. FY 1992-93 GROWTH REQUEST SUMMARY
6. FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY OPERATING BUDGET REDUCTIONS
7. FY 1992-93 PROPOSED TEACHER PAY SCALE
8. FY 1992-93 CAREER PATH TEACHER DISTRIBUTION
9. FY 1991-92 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY OPERATING BUDGET
ASSUMPTIONS
INSTRUCTION
. NUMBER OF APPROVED POSITIONS WILL BE ADHERED TO
. ENROLLMENT GROWTH OF 326 STUDENTS IS ANTICIPATED
. STAFFING GUIDELINES AND OVERALL PUPIL TEACHER RATIOS WILL REMAIN THE SAME
AS PREVIOUS YEARS
. SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS WILL BE SERVED IN THEIR HOME SCHOOLS
WHENEVER POSSIBLE
. APPLIED ACADEMICS WILL BE CONTINUED IN THE HIGH SCHOOLS.
OPERATIONS
. THE SCHOOL DIVISION WILL OPERATE WITHIN THE FY 1992.93 BUDGET
APPROPRIATIONS
. STATE AND LOCAL REVENUE WILL MEET PROJECTED LEVELS (ASSUMES FULL FUNDING
OF STATE BASIC AID)
. PARITY AMONG SCHOOLS WILL BE MAINTAINED
. AGNOR-HURT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WILL OPEN IN AUGUST 1992
. AGNOR-HURT ELEtJ,ENTARY WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON BOTH
FINANCIAL AND HUMAN RESOURCES (APPROX $1.0 MILLION)
. BUS REPLACEMENT EFFORT WILL BE BASED ON A 12 YEAR CYCLE.
. AN ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONSERVATION INITiATIVE WILL BE IMPLEMENTED
IN ALL SCHOOLS
. FUEL ESTIMATE WILL BE BASED ON $.85 PER GALLON
. A PORTION OF ALL DISCRETIONARY FUNDS WILL BE KEPT IN RESERVE TO PROTECT
AGAINST CHANGES IN FISCAL STATUS DURING THE YEAR
STAFFING / EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
· FY 1992-93 WILL BE THE FIRST FULL YEAR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SPRING 1991
SALARY SURVEY.
. PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PROGRAM WILL BE FUNDED
. TEACHER SALARY SCALE MOVEMENT / CLASSIFIED / ADMINISTRATIVE VESTING
. EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION FOR HEALTH CARE WILL INCREASE TO COVER
INCREASE IN PREMIUM (MID.LEVEL PLAN) FOR FY 1992-93
. PROFESSIONAL VRS RATE OF 12.68%, NON. PROFESSIONAL 9.16%
. FICA RATE OF 7,65% AND PROFESSIONAL LIFE INSURANCE RATE OF 9.471%
Page A 1
2/4/92
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY OPERATING BUDGET
OBJECTIVES
. INCREASE THE OVERALL TEACHER SALARY SCALE AND ADJUST THE FLAT PORTIONS
OF THE SCALE AS WELL AS THE TOP STEP OF THE SCALE.
. LATERAL SCALE MOVEMENT(TOWARDS MIDPOINT) FOR EMPLOYEES ON THE
COUNTY PAY SCALE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SALARY SURVEY
. IMPLEMENT RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE
. ELIMINATE POSSIBILITY OF ANOTHER REDUCTION IN FORCE
. REINSTATE A PORTION OF THE FUNDING FOR TH E POSITIONS REDUCED IN FY 1991-92
. REINSTATE A PORTION OF THE STAFF DEVELOPMENT AND SUMMER SCHOOL
FUNDS TAKEN OUT OF THE FY 1991.92 OPERATING BUDGET
STRATEGIES
. INCREASE TEACHER SALARY SCALE. $500 ACROSS ENTIRE SCALE AND
AND AN ADDITIONAL $500 AT THE TOP OF THE SCALE $668,924
. INCREASE MERIT POOL FROM 4% TO 5% TO ALLOW HIGH PERFORMING
EMPLOYEES TO VEST MORE THAN ONE STEP $101,987
. LIMIT THE INCREASE IN BASE BUDGET REQUESTS AND LEASE PURCHASE BUSES
TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR:
RECYCLING INITIATIVE
REINSTATEMENT OF 3 RIF POSITIONS
STAFF DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SCHOOL
$20,250
$99,549
$62,000
$100,000
Page A2
2/4/92
.
.
.
N
C"l 2 0 0
C ON.-l 0
r:l f'-..
7 CI:0'l<: <.D
r-- LL."':'" Z C\J
N LUlJ)-
t:}~Q f'-..
Z>-a: .,.- >-
<u.a ld7 en
I llJ
0 :J
Z
llJ
>
.. . -....-........ llJ
.0.,..'. a:
;\~i~ C') 0
m Z
N <
m U)
m
0
,qct'Z....W >- z
l.L :J
..:>>::-::,<... C) l.L
n. ... ...._",
z U)
0 z
~
0 ~ .,.- ~ 0) 0) :J a:
llJ llJ 0 .,.- ~ 0 0 llJ
t- :J f'-.. C') f'-.. l1) llJ CL
a:
0 z C') C') C\J ~ -l
llJ llJ <.D C') l1) <.D U) a:
-, > 0) ~ <.D ~ llJ <
N 0 llJ ~W W t- o
q> a: a: f'-.. .,.- 0 <
CJ) .- CL .,.- C') l1) a: a:
..J m ld7 ld7 W 0
m a: l.L
0 .- l1) l1) ~ C\J <.D llJ U)
0 >- 0 C') --cl co l1) co C') ~ llJ
l.L llJ llJ N.. .,.-
J: -- l1) l1) C') <.D 0 S:2
t- :J 0 ..,.. .,.-
- -l
U < Z ~ l1) 0) C') C') .,.- r- .-<
CL llJ .,.- l1) C') <.D f'-.. llJ 0
CJ) S:2 > 4: ~ ~ ~ '<t f'-.. I < ill C)
llJ W ld7 r- a: C"
U r- a: 0) .,.- z CL :J rJ
Z .,.- C') l1) 0 z c...
..J < ld7 ld7 W C) llJ
en 0 z >
:) llJ r- llJ
U) Z a:
0. < :J llJ
en 0 r-
>- U) 0 <
..... U) 0 r- .-
Z < U) m
a: z m
:) > Z
0 Z llJ a: L()
U 0 C) 0
r- z l.L a:
W z < 0 llJ
..J llJ I llJ en
a:: 2 0 r- 2
llJ U) Z llJ
<t U) r- :J >
~ a: 0 0 0
:J llJ 0 Z
W en -l 0 0
en 2 l.L <
llJ llJ
..J W llJ a: >- ~
<t ::> a: -l
U) a: 0
Z llJ 0 L!J 0
W r- z 2
CL > < :J a: 2
W r- l.L 0 llJ
I U) 2
U) a: (}) -l l.L
a: W z < ~ llJ
llJ U. (j) ::> a: ~ Q a: r- >
en 0 W llJ Z
-l W Z U. 0 -l 0 < r-
2 0 -l :J
(j) ::> w (j) z llJ a:
llJ W 0 2 l.L C) 0
2 Z > Z 0 llJ
() J: W W <( 2 ~ Z -l X
>- a: 0 > a: ..- 0 llJ
-l a: llJ fA llJ 0
< :::> (j) w -l l- 2 U) I >-
0 a: x < r-
0 <( 0 0 z
en -l 0: -l U) llJ U)
llJ W r- a: a: :J
C) <( l- W <( CL CL 0 llJ 0
<: 0 <( 0 0 :J CL Z a: 0
a: 0 l- W 0 U) < 0...
ill -l (j) LL -l
>
<:
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY BUDGET SUMMARY
PROJECTED REVENUE
LOCAL - SCHOOLS $413,568
STATE REVENUE $20,130,287
FEDERAL REVENUE $600,989
LOCAL - TRANSFERS $32,353,492
TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUE $53,498,336
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
BASE:
OPERATING EXPENSES
COMPENSATION
$10,387,818
$41.453,974
, tI:.. !f'-1 '1/- ~ >--
$51 ,841 ,792 ~.? Ie""
GROWTH: OPERATING EXPENSES
COMPENSATION
$148,711
$621 ,927
$770,638
AGNOR/ OPERATING EXPENSES
HURT: COMPENSATION
$390,064
$495,842
$885,906
TOTAL PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
$53,498,336
2/4/92
01/25/1992
3?FDO?01
hL3E~~~E CO~:~{ ?~BLIC SCHOC~S
F1 1992-93 EXPES:,7CRE SU~~~,Y
FY91
BUDGET
F'i9l
;..c;:\.:~
F'in
=.'::GET
FY92
?i:V1 SED
FY93
REQ'CES:'
CEA.!,GE FROM
FY 1991-92
CR1G1SAL
------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
... - 1\.-:2 :~\S:RvC7:0:;-S.:...:..:._';::::S
CO~.?ESS;..::C~
E~~LOYEE EESEF:TS
C?E~~T:SG EXPESSES
2~,631,5~2
6,939,750
15,922
25, :51,5:9
5,796,651
6,965
25,~';9,O:4
7,~:3,555
o
25,822,574
6,255,097
o
27,455,952
6,621,163
o
1,606,898
-782,492
o
Page
PERCEsr
Cr...k~GE
6.22
-10.57
0.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:xr. J..L ::1,:87,214 31,965,255 33,252,709 32,077,671 34,077,115 824,4C6 2.48
.. . - DR8?-O::r PREVENTIO~
CO:-'.?EKShT:OS 55,238 126,338 95,103 96,529 0 -96,103 -100.00
E:-'.?LOYEE BESEFITS 22,434 31,454 25,984 16,448 0 -25,984 -100.00
C?ERhT:r;G EX?Er,SES 2,000 3,20 0 0 0 0 0.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
':'0:' J..L 79,572 161,C35 122,C87 112,977 0 -122,087 -100.00
.. . - C.A.T.E.C
O?ERAT:KG EXPESSES 688,030 647,382 735,067 638,558 613,209 -122,858 -16.69
... - :KSTRUCTIONAL SV??C:\':Z'
CO:-'.?ENSJ..TICS 941,375 1,024,:61 7C8,752 754,309 846,80 138,095 19.48
E!,;?LOEE ::ENEn::S 202,133 203,10 :61,261 150,924 179,290 -1,971 -1.09
OPEMT:S:; EX?ESSES 487,072 369,351 238,847 212,043 388,620 H9,773 62.71
C.z...?ITAL C::';"1.hY 0 15,785 0 0 0 0 0.00
TOTAL
1,630,581
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25.33
... - S~J~!ST SERVICES
CO~.?EI'S.~TICN
461,749
113,977
1,749,388
26,5CO
E~~LOYEE =E~EF:TS
O?ERAT!~~ EX?ENSES
CAPI'rh1. OUTLhY
1,613,445
490,087
109,219
1,580,507
7,255
1,:28,860
491,517
115,499
1,733,868
21,248
1,127,275
427,714
85,385
1,701,364
18,748
1,414,757
415,544
65,974
1,609,106
21,633
285,897
-75,973
-29,525
-124,762
385
-15.46
-25.56
-7.20
1. 81
TOTAL
2,351,614
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-9.73
... - ~~DIA SERVICES
CO~.?Er;SAT:ON
E~.?LOYEE EEKEFITS
O?ERATIKG EX?ESSES
CAP1ThL OUTLAY
176,467
48,7C8
230,902
164,lCO
2,187,067
174,620
47,01
219,726
135,175
2,352,132
192,773
50,511
226,884
78,764
2,233,212
187,523
43,439
213,384
61,014
2,132,257
196,249
45,222
219, H6
103,951
-229,875
3,476
-5,289
-7,738
25,187
1. 80
-10.47
-3.41
31. 98
TOThL
620,177
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.85
... - VOChT:O~AL EOUChT:CN
CO~.?EKSAT:CN
13,80
576,992
2,936
:48,932
:1,925
505,360
11,925
564,568
11,000
15,636
-925
-7.76
::/25/1992
hL=E~~E CCU~~Y ?UEL1C SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 EX~ES~I~URE SU~Y~Y
Page
=?FJC?Ol
CP.ANGE FROM
FY91 FY91 F'i92 F'i 92 FY93 F'i 1991-92 PERCE~T
BUJGET AC~\.:hL 3\:DGET REv1SED REQ\:EST CR:GI~J..L Cf'~"GE
------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------
. . . - VOCA7:::;:~.I.':' EJ:';C.;::C:~
';"V:;~.'"'''''-;-~ EESEFI':'S 1,059 225 917 988 853 -64 -6.98
-.- -""'..........
c:: :::?..~.:!!' G EX.?ESSES 40,113 17,583 44,387 37,878 44,474 87 0.20
C;'2j,:J..L 0:;7!-J..Y 75,651 66,5'6 28,927 24,588 30,527 1,600 5.53
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:'~:.~~ 130,666 67,288 86,156 75,379 85,854 698 0.81
..t - E:\C.~~S '~O:)J E:E~S1.;=A_':\Y
CC~.:ESSATION 9,528 6,266 14,117 13,943 0 -14,117 -100.00
E~.?LOYEE BENEFITS 734 474 583 583 0 -583 -100.00
C?E:':U..'!!~G EX?El'SES 51,992 0,980 50,629 40,945 0 -50,629 -100.00
02:~hL O'.):;":'AY 10,500 10,063 1,177 1,000 0 -1,177 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:~:;'.L 72,754 60,782 66,506 56,471 0 -66,506 -100.00
.. t - BRmmSVlLLE ELE~.ES':AF.Y
CC~.?ENSAnON 9,885 5,346 9,000 8,500 0 -9,000 -100.00
E..\,I..?:"CYEE BENEFI':S 757 409 1,000 1,000 0 -1,000 -100.00
::?:S;;}.:I!~G EX?El'SES 37,06 34,966 35,788 27,908 0 -36,788 -100.00
C;'.?:::.z..L CUTLAY 10,000 7,999 11,000 8,000 0 -11,000 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:-o:.~
58,068
48,721
57,788
45,408
o
-57,788
-100.00
... - CROZET ELE~~~7~~Y
Cc:~~~SA'!!CS
6,560 4,646 6,110 5,810 0 -6,110 -100.00
506 355 468 468 0 -468 -100.00
37,417 32,640 36,191 34,133 0 -36,191 -100.00
11,563 10,768 13,408 8,538 0 -13,408 -100.00
E~~8YEE EE~EFI~S
C?E~~TI~G EX?E~SES
C...?:~AL OUTLAY
':"O':AI. 56,046 48,408 56,177 48,949 0 -56,177 -100.00
.. t - GREER ELE!-'.EN'I.Z._~Y
CO:-'.?ESS.~TICN 11,610 9,542 11,610 11,448 0 -11,610 -100.00
E."''? LCYEE EEKEFIJ:'S 889 736 888 888 0 -888 -100.00
C?E?AT:l'G EX?ESSES 77,068 55,873 66,019 50,344 0 -66,019 -100.00
CJ..? 171o.L OUTLAY 22,660 24,594 11,111 9,445 0 -11,111 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'I'O'7 hL 112,227 90,745 89,628 72 ,125 0 -89,628 -100.00
. .. - HOLL Yl".EAD ELE~.El':;"J.~"Y
C(;~.?:.::~S.;:~C~ 13,072 ;'4,696 ;'2,864 12,864 0 -12,864 -100.00
E~.?:"OYEE 3E~EFl:-S 1,001 1,133 1,075 1,075 0 -1,075 -100.00
01/25/:S~2
hL3E~~E COCS71 ?~3L:C SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 EY2END1~'CRE SU~~~Y
Page
3
e:-?J:?Cl
FY91
3";::GET
FY91
AC"U;'.L
FY92
FY92
REV:SE:J
F"i93
F.EQ":EST
CP..ANGE FROM
FY 1991-92
CR1G1NAL
PERCEST
CHA..."GE
:::;:;:;ET
... - E:::":'~'2.:W ~:'=:,"~~;-':.:'.:~:i'
C"~.?:~J.'!' ::'::::".~"Y
78,000
21,567
66,1:2
13,75~
63,521
15,:95
52,044
12,365
o
o
-63,621
-15,195
-100.00
-100.00
C?~?";'T:~;~ EX?=:~~SES
:'::;'..L :13,740 95,7C4 92,i55 78,368 0 -92,755 -100.00
.. . - ~-=:~:'~~:'~E:t :::'",,':5 EL:::~.
CC~.?::I;S.;::CN 18,215 18,062 13,342 13,162 0 -13,342 -100.00
E!-'.?:"CYEE =E~EFITS 1,481 1,692 1,021 1,021 0 -1,021 -100.00
C~::?_~T::~;G E;l.?E!'SES 81,413 61,425 47,407 37,134 0 -47,407 -100.00
C.:...?::J...!... :: ~::..;. Y 14,244 17,40 9,CO~ 7,650 0 -9,000 -100.00
:":::J..L
115,353
98,622
70,770
58,957
o
-70,770
-100.00
...... - RZJ E I LL ELE!""'=:~;TARY
c.:...?::-.~ ~__7_;'.Y
4,450 4,753 4,740 4,637 0 -4,740 -100.00
345 368 360 360 0 -380 -100.00
26,491 24,604 33,798 27,824 0 -33,798 -100.00
3,370 2,787 5,224 4,440 0 -5,224 -100.00
CO~..?Er-;S;'.:: :S
E~..?:"OYEE =::~;E::?S
O?E?_:'.TI!;:; EX.?E!,SES
:"8:-~ 34,656 32,512 44,142 37,261 0 -44,142 -100.00
.. . - S::C7::S'/:1:":: ::::::--'2!\'I}'3,Y
cO~.?'Er;SA::GS 5,135 5,127 6,900 5,900 0 -6,900 -100.00
E!'Q:CYEE =ESEFI~S 420 475 500 500 0 -600 -100.00
C?E~~TIJ;G Ex?::J;SES 33,458 28,837 30,821 27,125 0 -30,821 -100.00
CA.?ITJ.e!" o:..-::-'""~ Y 3,127 3,253 4,400 3,300 0 -4,400 -100.00
~=u 42,140 38,692 42,721 37,925 0 -42,721 -100.00
.. . - 5':":8::: ROEI~SCS EL::~.ES::A..,Y
CC~.?::N SAT: CN 11,205 7,316 11,168 11,168 0 -11,168 -100.00
E.'"'.?LCYEE 3ES::FnS 858 497 858 858 0 -858 -100.00
C?E,,-"T:J;G ::x?E!>SES 59,221 54,280 54,278 47,171 0 -54,278 -100.00
CJ.21:'hL C.."?...AY 20,380 12,491 11, DC 5 5,362 0 -11,005 -100.00
:-O:J..L 91,664. 74,583 ,77,309 64,559 0 -77,309 -100.00
.. . - S:':SY ?O:~'I' E:"E~.ENT A..,Y
CO:-'..:::SS"~::CS 6,304 5,676 5,698 5,080 0 -5,698 -100.00
E~..?:'::lEE 3:::N:::F::S 483 434 434 ~34 0 -434 -100.00
Cr:::;v..T:~G :::XPE!>SES 37,321 30,240 35,780 31,394 0 -35,780 -100.00
01/2511552
BPFDCP01
k:3E~~~E COU~7Y PUEL1C SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 EXPENDI7URE SU~~~Y
Page
4
FY91
3UDGET
F'i91
AC:1:hL
F'i 92
EUDGET
FY92
REV1SED
FY93
REQUEST
CP.A...'iGE FROM
FY 1991-92
CR1G1SAL
PERCE};T
C"~"'GE
.... 111 - S:--:SY ?O~~.;~ E::'::~.i:S:;'~":\Y
CJ..?1ThL O::-;::;"Y
7 , 515
7,968
14,272
12,272
o
-14,272
-100.00
?OTJ..L 51,623 44,3:9 56,184 49,180 0 -55,184 -100.00
.. . - ....'O:::3:.;:::X:K E1EV.ENT.:O"'';\Y
CO~.PEt;S.z..'I:OS 8,824 6,351 14,052 11,037 0 -14,052 -100.00
E!'I~LOYEE ::E!,EFI':'S 678 488 400 400 0 -400 -100.00
O?ERAT1l'G EY..?E~,SE5 46,090 45,808 44,396 38,919 0 -44,396 -100.00
CA?ITAL O....71~;Y 14,600 10,622 6,900 2,975 0 -6,900 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?OTAL 70,192 63,270 65,748 53,331 0 -65,748 -100.00
... - Y;"''iCEY Ei.:::Y.:::!,:ai.....~y
CO~.?ENSJ..7:CS 4,775 2,742 4,470 4,245 0 -4,470 -100.00
E~.?LOYEE 3E:';EF1TS 373 210 425 396 0 -425 -100.00
O?ERATI!,G EY.?El'SES 21,105 24,385 29,202 26,486 0 -29,202 -100.00
CA?IT1>.L O:'7LA Y 4,041 1,410 5,875 4,993 0 -5,875 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 30,294 28,746 39,972 36,120 0 -39,972 -100.00
.. . - O':'E ELE~':::S7hRY SCHOOL
C01'.?El'SA::CS 12,135 8,367 9,850 9,345 0 -9,850 -100.00
E."',? LOYEE 3ESEFI':'S 928 617 560 445 0 -560 -100.00
O?ERATIl'G EXPESS;;:S 57,415 49,415 45,340 32,289 0 -45,340 -100.00
CA?1TAL O:'"7LJ..Y 18,195 12,316 21,180 20,932 0 -21,180 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 88,674 70,715 76,930 63,011 0 -76,930 -100.00
... - V:?G:SIA 1- Ml:R..';J, Y ELEX
COJo'.?EI>iS.z;:::CS 0 0 7,201 7,201 0 -7,201 -100.00
EJo'.PLOYEE :aE~EFI7S 0 0 551 551 0 -551 -100.00
OPERAT1SG EX?ESSES 0 0 102,309 97,976 0 -102,309 -100.00
C1>.?IThL O:JTI.AY 0 0 33,973 32,973 0 -33,973 -100.00
TOTAL
o
o
144,034
138,701
o
-144,034
-100.00
... - AGSC~-HURT ELE~~NTARY
OPERAT1SG EX?ESSES
CA?lThL O:'"7LAY
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
116,930
57,830
116,930
57,830
100.00
100.00
TOTAL
o
o
o
o
174,760
174,760
100.00
::125/19~2
::<'Dep01
~:::E~~~E CO~~71 PU:::LIC SCHOOLS
F'i 1992-93 EXP~N:)I7'JRE su!-'.......J.....~y
Page
5
F'i91
3U;JGET
F'i91
ACTUAL
FY92
F'i92
REV1SEJ
F'i93
REQL:ES'l'
Cr~"GE FROX
FY 1991-92
CRIG1~AL
PERCES'l'
2tJ~GET
CP..r_"'GE
------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
~..=.7V ~I:::~ 3C~O::
E~2~CYE~ =~~EFI7S
5C'J
0 -19,~OO -100.00
0 -500 -100.00
0 -56,5:0 -100.00
0 -19,590 -:00.00
c;2I7J..L C::::LhY
14,675
1,150
56,462
30,095
11,737
900
52,694
17,092
19,400
500
66,510
18,575
C:'~..?E~S.L.::C:;
:?==;;'.T:~;~ :::i:..?E:,SES
54,3':4
19,590
16,738
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:::;::;'.L 102,383 82,422 106,000 90,137 0 -106,000 -100.00
... - EE:;:'EY ~~w:l.E SenD:;:'
CO~2ESSJ..::IOS 21,880 21,673 21,880 21,680 0 -21,880 -100.00
::!-'.?~OYEE :2E!\EF 17'$ 1,674 1,659 1,674 1,674 0 -1,674 -100.00
C?::R.l..Tlt\G EXPESSES 92,657 74,124 85,776 73,841 0 -85,776 -100.00
C.t..?ITAL C:-"::LhY 35,944 20,081 25,158 19,465 0 -25,158 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?OTAL 152,155 117,537 134,488 116,860 0 -134,488 -100.00
... - JO::::::'~ MIDJ:'::: SCHOOL
CC~.?::::I~S.;T:O!i 19,567 19,422 54,527 54,291 0 -54,527 -100.00
E~2:'CYEE =~S:::FI':'S 1,376 1,489 1,032 1,032 0 -1,032 -100.00
8?:::?..~7-:!\G EY2EI'SES 87,164 75,926 59,327 47,327 0 -59,327 -100.00
CA.?I'IA!.. O:'~=LAY 25,310 12,400 10,188 5,650 0 -10,168 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:'OrAL 133,437 110,237 125,074 108,310 0 -125,074 -100.00
.. . - \-..'.1..':' :OOS ~ID:)~E SC;.-:OQL
CO~2EI'Sh':'ION 13,070 11,851 13,407 12,955 0 -13,407 -100.00
:::~.?LOYEE :;:::I'E,1':'S 1,000 909 1,025 991 0 -1,025 -100.00
O?EAA'TII'G EXPESSES 65,835 75,101 86,378 72,003 0 -86,378 -100.00
Cl-.:PIT'AL C:-"::LAY 17,426 9,438 16,805 14,284 0 -16,805 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
':'C'l'AL 117,331 97,299 117,615 100,233 0 -117,615 -100.00
.. . - Al:;E~.hRLE SIGH SCHOOL
CO!-".PEN SA T! os 183,048 154,985 177,898 170,429 0 -177,898 -100.00
E.Y..?LOYEE :;EI'EFI'l'S 14,979 11,868 13,707 13,136 0 -13,707 -100.00
C?ERATI:-;G EXPEI'SES 393,976 337,575 354,947 313,633 0 -354,947 -100.00
c.~?1 TAL O~':'LAY 98,288 95,841 88,143 66,lC8 0 -88,143 -100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
':'CT AL
690,291
600,269
634,695
563,306
o
-634,695
-100.00
... - W. AlBE~.hRLE HIGH SCHOOL
C:;~.?El\S.~7:0N
147,425
137,141
148,739
144,739
o
-148,739
-100.00
0"/25119?2
E?F:JOP01
A:3E~~~E CCcSTY P~3L:C SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 EXPEN:J1T~RE SU~Y~~Y
Page
6
FY91
3UDGET
FY91
ACT~AL
FY92
FY92
RJ:.v1SED
CHh.',GE FROM
F'i93 FY 1991-92
REQcEST CR1G1NAL
PERCE!'>7
Cr:.A.',GE
3'JDGET
...... - 'vol. .:''':=:::''_~':<~:: :: .~;1. sc~oo~
:;'..?:7h.L ::"~:L.:'.Y
11,278
248,200
38,984
"0,531
202,597
40,730
11,379
241,670
27,795
11,073
198,889
23,258
o
o
o
-11,379
-241,670
-27,795
-100.00
-100.00
-100.00
E~.?:"OYEE :=E!;EF: ':'5
C?EAAT:~;G EXi'E~;SES
:'OTJ...L 445,887 390,999 429,583 377,959 0 -429,583 -100.00
- M::?.:J..Y E~"JCA7:CS CENTER
CC~.?ENSA::OS 3,905 3,:83 5,615 5,615 0 -5,615 -100.00
E~.?LOYEE 3ENEFl'!S 304 239 430 430 0 -430 -100.00
C?EAATISG EXPE:;SES 34,068 23,178 41,023 31,349 0 -41,023 -100.00
C;'2I'rAL C:';7LAY 5,160 2,877 4,700 4,000 0 -4,700 -100.00
:'OTAL
43,437
29,08
51,768
41,394
o
-51,768
-100.00
**. - E)~CUTly~ SERVICES
C.:'..?ITAL O:':7LhY
199,402 194,04 156,303 173,286 179,719 23,416 14.98
43,733 40,363 35,772 35,772 38,756 2,984 8.34
127,300 59,339 197,319 191,499 97,727 -99,592 -50.47
0 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 100.00
COX?ENSJ.:::ON
E~2LOYE! 3E~EFI=S
C?EAATING EXPESSES
':'OT AL 370,435 304,176 389,394 400,557 317,202 -72,192 -18.54
* .. - FE ?.SOl' l>iEL
CC~.?ENS~.7:0S 341,407 335,972 328,174 305,812 340,383 12,209 3.72
E.....?LOYEE 3E~EFI7-S 91,998 101,873 104,599 104,599 101,292 -3,307 -3.16
O?EAATIl>iG EXPEl>iSES 245,137 180,249 216,828 186,330 229,228 12,400 5.72
CA?ITAL O;"7LAY 50,016 56,663 4,500 3,825 4,100 -400 -8.89
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
70TAL 728,558 674,757 654,101 600,566 675,003 20,902 3.20
.. . - Fl S CAL SERV:CES
CO~.?ENSAT:ON 154,706 146,462 101,514 91,918 89,200 -12,314 -12.13
E.....?LOYEE 3ENEFl'!S 186,280 187,447 198,372 198,372 205,209 6,837 3.45
C?EAATING EXPENSES 494,912 458,984 516,175 691,864 459,373 -56,802 -11. 00
CJ..?ITAL Ou7LAY 20,880 6,484 4,050 4,050 11,150 7,100 175.31
Or-dER USES 65,317 2,245 0 0 295,025 295,025 100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
':'aT AL 922,095 801,623 820,111 986,204 1,059,957 239,846 29.25
.. . - TAA.';SPOR7A7:CN SERV1CES
CC~.?Er;SAT: OS 1,962,387 2,018,524 2,275,861 2,302,067 2,667,851 391,990 17.22
01/2 5/: 992
~~BE~~~E CO~S~1 P~BL:C SC~OCLS
FY 1992-93 E12ESJ:7o?E S~~~~~Y
Page
7
E?F)C?:: 1
FY91
FY91
ACToAL
Fi"92
FY92
CHANGE FROM
FY93 FY 1991-92
REQ~EST OR1G1SAL
PERCENT
CHA....GE
::;~:;~ET
~vrSE:)
------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
'"',.. - ::=_:':;S?CR:J..T:C!, s::?'.r:CES
E~2~:YEE =~~EFI~S
432,260
409,228 05,~55 475,455 578,665 103,210
755,356 1,:09,:44 1,040,700 1,100,619 -8,525
695,791 430,745 419,234 185,390 -245,355
21.71
-0.77
-56.96
C;'.?=:.:'~ :::Il.AY
714,742
962,245
C:E:=_:'''::~;:; EX?E!'\SES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:c:;..~
',071,55'
3,888,8.99
~,2;1,205
4,237,~56
4,532,525
241,320
5.62
... - E~::DI~G SERVICES
c.t,,?::: .t.!, O:J:'LA Y
1,765,531 1,745,626 1,950,469 1,993,287 2,233,387 282,918 14.51
450,599 371,494 432,265 432,265 483,187 50,922 11. 78
2,175,970 2,031,635 2,264,254 2,175,798 2,476,421 192,167 8.41
126,378 147,754 133,007 116,296 117,445 -15,562 -11.70
CCY.?E?,S;':Z:ON
~~::CYEE =E~EFITS
C:::::?}..:::~G EXPE:;SES
-----------------------------------------------------------.-------------------------------------------------
-.....-... 4,5:8,478 4,296,509 4,799,995 4,717,646 5,310,440 510,445 10.63
...V_.--J
. .. - SC:iOJL-3ASE:) l-.LI.OCJ..TIOXS
C?;:~:'.:':~;:; EXPE!>iSES 0 0 0 0 2,539,689 2,539,689 100.00
::~,}'.l. :-~:.:'..L 50,321,725 49,428,489 51,771,636 49,951,457 53,498,336 1,726,700 3.34
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 GROWTH REQUEST
PROJECTED COSTS: ADDITIONAL 326 STUDENTS
RECURRING NONRECURRING
TEACHERS - ;:\EGUlAR EDUCATIO~ (13) $433,857
TEACHERS - SPECiAL EDUCATiON (2.5) $80,049
TEACHER ASSISTANTS - SPECIAL ED. (2) $27,008
BUS DRIVE,~S (5) $47,653
BUS - FUEL A"\D SUPPliES $30,557
UTILITIES - AL3EMARLE HiGH SCHOOL $20,000
MATERIALS SUPPLIES -AL3:::rv1ARLE H.S. $3,000 $1,000
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES - AL3EMARLE H.S. $3,100
CUSTODIA"\S \2) $33,360
FACILITIES - EQUIPMENT $ 18,500
CLASSROOr..1 FURNISHiNGS $12,000
SCHOOL-BASED AlLOCATiO'\S $60,554
TOTAL GROWTH COSTS $739,138 $31,500
PROJECTED COSTS: AGNOR-HURT ELEMENTARY
TEACHEnS - ;:\EGULAR EDUCATION (6) $209,370
TEACHER ASSISTANT - REGULAR ED. (3) $39,624
PRINCIPAL $54,973
GUIDANCE COUNSELOR $38,015
LIBRARiAN $39,348
OFFICE PE;:\SONNEL (2) $35,172
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES $31,250
START-UP SPECIAL ED. MATERIALS $ 12,250
INSTRUCTiO~Al NETWORK $59,757
LIBRARY NETVvORK $9,728
SCHOOL OFFICE COr,I.PUTE;:\S $8,651
LIBRARY Bomes $85,680
LIBRARY EOUiPMENT $42,660
OFFICE EOUiPMENT $15,170
INSURANCE $7,573
. . BUS DRIVER $10,331
BUS AND RADIO $9,910
UTILITIES $79,610
CUSTODIANS (4) $69,009
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES $10,475
FACILITIES EQUIPMENT $9,750
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $4,000
. FACILITIES - START-UP MATERIALS $3,200
FACILITIES - PEST CONTROL $400
TOTAL AGNOR-HURT $597,900 $288,006
TOTAL GROWTH AND
AGNOR-HURT $1,337,038 $319,506
Page 81
1/26/92
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY BUDGET REDUCTIONS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY BUDGET REQUEST
EXERCISE PAY~OLL LAPSE FACTO~
SAViNGS Dl:: 70 LEASE PURCHASE OF 1 ADDITIONAL AND 18 REPLACEMENT BUSES
POSTPONE PL.:riCHASE OF COMPUTERIZED FUEL DISPENSING SYSTEM
POSTPONE ?UriCHASE OF CENTRAL OFFICE NETWORK HARDWARE
REDUCTION ;~~ PERSONNEL SERVICES
ELIMINATE ~/AiL COURiER POSITION
POSTPONE R::PLACEMENT OF MEDiA COURiER VAN
POSTPONE PuRCHASE OF INSTRUCTIONAL EQUIPMENT
POSTPONE i~!,PLEtJ,ENTATION OF NEW STAFFING GUIDELINES (TEACHERS & CLERICAL)
POSTPONE Flj~DING FOR CORRECTION OF THE SALARY COMPRESSION FACTOR
FOR CLASSiFiED AND ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES
POSTPONE FL.;NDING OF ADDITIONAL FY 1992-93 STAFFING REQUESTS
[FY 1992-93 BUDGET
FY 1991-92 REDUCTIONS (STILL UNFUNDED)
P,EDUCTION iN FORCE (35 POSITIONS)
ELIMINATE T::ACHER VOUCHERS
ELIMINATE ?riOJECT EXCELLENCE AND S.!.P.
REDUCE FUi'iJiNG FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION TUITION
REDUCE EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATION COST CENTER
REDUCE DISCRETIONARY NON-SCHOOL ACCOUNTS (10%)
Ii'iSTITUTE DOUBLE BUS RUN AT CALE AND GREER
CHANGE BUS REPLACEMENT EFFORT FROM 10 TO' 2 YEAR CYCLE
REDUCE GAS PRiCE ESTIMATE FROM $.90 TO $.85 PER GALLON
SAVINGS DL':: TO THE LEASE PURCHASE OF 24 NEW AND REPLACEMENT BUSES
Page A 3
(S280,000)
(5536,250)
($30,000)
($13,000)
(S23,189)
($19,222)
($12,000)
(S141,477)
($824,900)
($49,689)
(S205,433)
(S2, 135, 160)
($1,142,215)
(S70,000)
(S35,000)
(S40,000)
(S5,000)
($44,435)
($20,660)
(S147,000)
($25,000)
(S876,250)
1/27:92
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1992-93 PRELIMINARY BUDGET REDUCTIONS
FY 1991-92 REDUCTIONS (CONTINUED)
ELIMINATE FOOD SERVICE TRANSFER ($40,000)
REDUCE STAFF DEVELOPMENT ($SO,OOO)
REDUCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-CONSULTANTS ($3S,000)
POSTPONE PUHCHASE OF FOUR-WHEEL-DRIVE VEHICLES ($30,SOO)
REDUCE EQUIPrl.ENT EXPENDITURES (10%) ($9,646)
REDUCE ADVEHTISING EXPENDITURES ($10,000)
REDUCE OUT -DF-STATE RECRUITMENT TRAVEL EXPENSES ($1,SOO)
REDUCE CENTRAL OFFICE INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES ($51,008)
REDUCE CENTRAL OFFICE TRAVEL ALLOCATIONS ($10.000)
REDUCE BUILD,NG SERVICES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES (SS,200)
ELIMINATE 1 REQUESTED MECHANIC POSITION (INCLUDES FRINGE) ($21,493)
SAVINGS DUE TO THE LEASE PURCHASE OF DATA PROCESSING ($63,980)
AND SCHOOL-BASED EQUIPMENT
!FY 1991-92 BUDGET ($2,733.887)
ITOTAL FY 1992-93 BUDGET REDUCTIONS ($4,869,046)1
Page A 4 1/27,'92
PROPOSED
Albemarle County Schools
1992 - 1993
TEACHER PAY SCALE*
YEARS
STEP EXPERIEKCE
BACHELOR
MASTERS MASTERS + 30
DocrORA TE
0 0 23,475 24,475 25,475 26,475
1 1 23,475 24,475 25,475 26,475
2 2 23,475 24,475 25,475 26,475
3 3 26,625 27,625 28,625 29,625
4 4 26,625 27,625 28,625 29,625
5 5 26,625 27,625 28,625 29,625
6 6 26,625 27,625 28,625 29,625
7 7 26,625 27,625 28,625 29,625
8 8 26,625 27,625 28,625 29,625
9 9 29,775 30,775 31,775 32,775
10 10 29,775 30,775 31,775 32,775
11 11-12 29,775 30,775 31,775 32,775
12+ 13+ 3? "r 33,375 34,375 35,375
-,-' ,)
"' In addition to annual salaries, AJbemarle County pays the employee contribution to the
Virginia Retirement System and Life Insurance as well as funds toward medical insurance.
C/)
...J
o
o
----
I
--<
U
U)
>--
~ ~
'z ::::i'\
::::i'\
::J"'--'
0'
u~
L:J::::i'\
...J"'--'
r/
<
~
l!J
CQ
...J
<
,......, ::st
c N r--
,......, ~ V)
N ,...... V)
II II II "<j-
...J ...J ...J
-< -< -<
r- r- r-
0 0 0
r- r- r-
z
o
~
~
:::J
~
-
~
~
C/)
~
Q
~
W
~
~
U
<t:
r..LJ
~
I
I
I
~ I
"5 I
~ I
\CI
oc
I
I
I
"
.....
.....
.....
'-
'1
1
~I
::)
;:; 1
~ 1
;;1
'-'1
1
:r.
~
::)
....
u
-
U
~
\C
o
,......
~
~
~
~
~
r..LJ
W
~
<t:
U
.-...
(,)
....
IV ;:l
[:]::3
_ ;:l
. ....
0;;:;
< .~
l:.l ~
t...., ..
, .D
et:: (,)
l:.l ~
:.:.J~
IV :-;
<0
u8
...0
V'l
'--'
:r.
+ ~
N....-----
'"'""u*
~:-;::\C
r.,::) .
~..-l.f")
f-<CV)
C/JC\"--"
C"'"l
~
::)
-
u
~
.......
C\
"<j-
:I'.l
~
It)
....
u
C':j
It)
......
C\
"<j-
et::
0.-...
b 2
::J3
~ ~
V) III
Z .~
_ :.or.
...JE
< (,)
z >
02
en :':l
~8
r::q
O~
et::'-'
~
-
rl :r.
",;,b-----
C\..c~
u c
~ _ oc
t1J;j~
f-<......,......
C/JC"'"l"--"
oc
~ (,)
o ~
O-g
D::~
en::;
enC
:s~
u'-'
:r.
oc ~
I .....-----
C"'"l;:;*
~:-;::V)
u.J ::) .
E-<~"<j-
C/J~~
~
~
~
CI:l
~
~
N t::
o~-----
~u*
r.' ~ ,......
~ It) .
f-<......co
C/Jr--"--"
V)
f ..
r.
C\
I
cr,
e-.
~
c-
o
C
C'
e-.
~
c
I
s:
c;
~
e-.
::0
I
c:::
c::o
C\
~
i
i
i
r
J
~
I
i
!
(
2:
I
~
~
!
.
.
.
.
~
i
i
1
i
j
i
!
so
I
23
C'
-
ag
I
~
~
. ~
<.J
.>(
~
c..
.....
~iJ
~~
~ 13
~~
.....
g~
b ~
~18
~ 6
~~
.....
~
....
.....
III
....
CJ
>
o
.....
~
....
.....
v.
....
Co'
>
o
.....
CJ
:J
....
.....
.,
L-
CJ
~
.....
~
....
.....
~,
....
CJ
~
<::
~
........
......'c
o~.s
o >! ~~
..... 1:.~
g.u~
V':tI)<
~
~
Vl
~O>
'-1 :::
;:1j
O>~
.5_
~
N
~
01 ~
..::l ~.:::I
01 ......
..... c
'd. t' ~
- ':l '"
~~a...
~
N
~
CJ
Vl v.
0>:::1
:''i I: \.t-.I
'rl."'" C
'd.~8.
.5,g~
~
....
~
c.;
t:~ V.
~ 0\:::1
:.1 =~
.~ ,""" s::
c;, ~ 8.
= '" CO
"-'="-
CJ
c., Vi
0". :::s
"4 =~
........, <::
"3, ~ 8.
::: ~ to
:...:=c...
CJ
t." Vi
-= C"l::l
.~ .~ '"2
'd. U; ~
= CO CO
:...J=c..
~
~
~
CJ
" III
~ o\:::s
t., C "'-
,'""'.,..( C
c;, ~ 8.
ceo",
W:::c...
"
.....
::l.
:::s
",
tJ
'.
'""
~
N
~
C\
~ ~
-- C"I --- -....:;)
LjiC"\_ Ln
.\.D -"'0.0 -
- - -- c:: t,1 ~ g' - 0 ~
E a ~ ~ Vl ~ 'jO> & ~~. g 6-'~ ~ .~
;::1- t;~ oJiJ "''E >~ l>3 cj-~
88~.5~~u~~~a~~g~~
~
l'"1
~
~
C\
-... .
.......... C"'\- --..
I.") ..- Lo""')
~ -'"O..c
~:;:; ....:. <::., Cl S l:J ~ 8
~~~"":'rl ~~~ rlv.A~ ~....~
...., ';j ] -s ~.::.l.;j 0> rl CJ a :::s go ~ <:J <:J
;::1~v.CJ~ iJEj'E:::S>~~~rl~~
oO:::l~=~.....a~o~~o~""'"""""",
uuuo~~~U~~~~~"~~~~
~
r".
~
.c
~
0:
~ ~,
l:J = 8
., ~ 0 ~ g
C V. o;Llv...-i
=.... ~ ~ :.:l ......, !:l = oJ :::s.... ~ ....
:< r-1 .E CJ.c ""- '" >"8 <:J. oj <:J
o r-1 V. ~ U 0 j' .... '" O'..c rl.....
....0:::1 ........, CJ 00....."''''
c:::uu.5 :.J~ ~<x<x.x<x"'r--f-<
.......
U"I
.......
U"I
~
r'1
~
....... ~
1.:) L..'i
N ~ ~
_ u 0
2 ;:: r;:J" -;-\.;1 v. -tJ Vl .~ ....
i ;:: .g ~ O\.~ 'g, 1: ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ [id CJ g
2~8~.~~~~~t~3~~~~~~
~uu:.J~~~~~oc..<X<XX~r--r--3
~
("')
....... ~
U"I ~"l
N ~ ~
= = ~ 0
:.,.,.-oj ~.-!, CJ c:: .:.:: u
C ,.......; rl =- .f""'l U.,-j Vl t.: .,-4 ~
;:: .,..oj ..c ..c: " :,,; ""0 s... C > u......., CJ ~ ~..... ::J
~~ g'~.~.:; g'G b'g 2:::: 8 ~~8 ~~.= g,
~88~~~~a~~~8~~~~~~g~
. .
~
~~
."l U"l
N --
= = u 0
...;.~ ~ =u u ~
rl rl:lt ~ .,....oj ~...... u .,....oj . ~ c:: u
=CJ~'~ CJ~~CJ= >grl~~"" CJO_
~ ~ ~:J ~ ~.~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~A ~ ~ .8 ~~ ~
.... :::s 0.... =.... 0 -< Ii >! 0 OJ '" .... ~ 8... '" '" ~........
~~U:.J:.J~~~~~~~OOc..<x~~r--3~3
~
("')
~
~ ~
." U"I
N -c-
o. .....c U 0 0
...., ...J .... ~..... CJ C v. u Vl v .>.:
'n :a .~ .,... u ~'M L.t U
E~-OJ.....2 OJ~~~>rlt:::s~~~OJ_
l5 ~.,....oj ~ ~ ~ g"~ b' ~ E..o ~ ~ M 5 ~
.... g~~_........o_~>!",io!....._~"'_
===0~w~~~...J~~o~~~~~r--~3
"
....
o
.....
~
....
~
....
8
u
.....
.,
c:
~
C\
("')
....
~
~j O>~
.... .5 8'
j;C_::2cc
~
C1\
U"I
-
~
~
....,
c:l Vl
~{1 D~
~ ~.~ 8'
,,"u~<X
~
U"I
....
~
:It
o N
~.;1 .~
~ ~~ ~
...J C1 01 0\....;
:1 :2 5.~ ~
u U L.' ~ ~
~
r-
~
..... l:J
= 0
~ ~u ~
8~~e
2lJu~
~
""
....
..... =
c 0
~ Vl
;a ~.>.: ~
8~:Oe
2lJGe::
~
....
N
~
:;;115
tt: Ol
.... = Vl
;l ~.~ ~
Bu8~
~
~
:;jg
.... ~ t:l
;l ~.~ ~
5,...-o1,..-1..c::
uUt..:'E--
........
" Vl
.... L-
o 0
tt
e OJ
.... .':1
00
~v;
J.j~
""
.....
..... l:J
OJ 0 ~
~ "1 ~ L..i v;
.c ......... CJ I
.,J c-J "'--"l '0 M
.-.... ~ t.... >, '"
.~ g ~ ~ i5i a :i
""
.....
..... l:J
OJ 0 ~
'i C.l lJ) s.........; ~ II)
;J ........ CJ..... oJ ~
E~V)L..iv)~"O f""'1
.,..., rl ~ 1-. ~ ....., >-0 >
~g:C~~f,.5i~:i
~
U"l
.....
.....
CJ '0
'i c;s....V-Ir-&1-IC:
~ ...., CJ ......... c.; cj
-' to., ~ ~ ~ ~ rl
. ....!:'l Qj :......., '"' '"'
~g:c<x~f,.5i~
~
""
~
.....
.....
e.: tI4'1:J
~.~ ~.;:; c ~ f; ~
::: to') !:1 ~t..;...l"O:::lM
.~ to, cu t......,..... >.,~ ;:.-,
,:, ~ <X ~ i5i a r-- ~
~
.,.
tr.~
" ~ V) CJ C
~ ~ ~'c "" ~ ~
...., c ~ s...., 0'\ ~ >,
t3.ssa~ae:;:i
~
""
~
=
o
::l Ol '0
t.j s..., a V) ~ c:
~ ~ -a'e ~ ~
.~...... C.l s.... s..., ~
:38:1.~e::~
'Q"
=
~ v. ~
L.., t... ~ II) c.J C
CJ CJ.c...... > ~
>~ c.s...., 1'0...,
.~ L..l Q,\ ~ l.. >.,
S6:~~~:i
u
-'
~
,.
5
i:
t:
CJ
~
iE
.:;
:...
~
co
....
CJ
.>(
2
~
C1\
~
Zl
~
~t;
OJ =
'0....
iil g
.... Cl:
>:<lo-;
~
c:J
....
<:J
C>
~
~g.
'0....,
= C
e EJ
oQ....,
~
co
~
~
r-
~
'"'
I.!)
_""'-=:>I..-r
~
~
~
N
~
~ ~"l
N ("')
~
~
N
~
....
OJ
0..
~
~ tt:
0".
C
'0....,
= =
'" =
.... CJ
c.:l....,
~
:::
Vl
Ol
=
....
c
c:
CJ
...,
~
~
.....
~
u
'"
:>
Vl
....
:It
CJ
~
J
"
..., "
OJ CJ
~ ~
~ g
(l) -:;
':":r
'"
~
C1\
Ul
rl
Li",
l'"1
CJ'l
l'"1
U"l
("')
~..,
c"'
~
~
c:
~
c
""
~
....
o
~
r-
c-
-.c
0'
r-
I"'".
""
0'
c::o
'-'='
s
a:;
'"
c:;
""
or.
~
"
'2.
f
'-
o
L-
i
~
-=
~
n
Ul
N
co
N
....
R;
~"l
<:>
R;
~
N
r-
~"l
N
("')
~..,
N
o
....
.....
""
""
~..,
("')
o
r".
r-
~
N
co
rl
rl
r-
<:"
R.
U"I
C\
I.!)
0'.
....
c::o
~
r-
'"
N
C\
~
ex:;
~
'"
....
:::.
~
."l
C
~"l
...
""
c:;
~
Ul
o
U"I
'"
'-'='
en
.....
&:
C"'
r
I '
111
"
....
CJ
..c
l,;
CO
I;l
....
'-
o
L-
).!
]
,>,
i'"
j~
8
~
t?
"
.-<
o '
'j ~
co
""
d
\
, .
_. !'31-'1~.,
t) :..:caro. --,--..~.~-
.. 9,).. iJ,)..u-:.-'/dJ
j';:i.-~""""'-~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
401 MciNTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901-4596
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Members of the Board of super;~s~rJ
Lettie E, Neher, Clerk, CMC r
FROM:
DATE:
January 30, 1992
SUBJECT:
Appointments to Various Boards I Commissions I Committees
Applications enclosed for:
1) ARCHITECTUAL REVIEW BOARD: Advertised,
2 CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION: Advertised,
3) JAUNT BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Advertised,
4) PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY: The term of Archibald
Craige expired in December, 1991. Mr, Craige does not wish to continue
serving. Advertised.
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD: Mr. Camblos has been con-
tacted about serving; he has not decided yet.
EQUALIZATION BOARD: One more member must be appointed for the Calendar
Year 1992. Serving in 1991 for Jack Jouett District was: Edward H, Deets,
Jr, He is eligible for reappointment,
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: The term of Bruce D, Rasmussen as
the Samuel Miller representative expired on January 19, 1992. There is no limit
on the number of terms a representative may serve,
PLANNING COMMISSION: The term of Werner Sensbach as the University of
Virginia non-voting member expired on December 31, 1991 (this is a one-year
term) .
PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY: The term of Norma J. Diehl
expired in December, Mrs, Diehl has not decided whether she wishes to
continue.
LEN:mms
~
Memo to: Board of Supervisors
Date: January 30, 1992
Page 2.
APPLICATIONS ATTACHED FROM THE FOLOWING PERSONS:
PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILIITIES AUTHORITY:
James David Carroll
Ricardo Eugenio Preve
Willard C. Rowe
John Wesley Steedly
Craig G. Van de Castle
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD:
James David Carroll
Anne B. Collins
Mary E. (Betty) Driskill
William A. Edgerton
Dieane Edgerton Miller
Alice Page Pool
Craig G. Van de Castle
CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION:
Henry G. Silva
JAUNT BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
Betty L. Newell
Also attached is an application from Charles Albert Abbey. We had been
holding this application for quite some time. Mr. Abbey said to consider him
when something of interest came up.
CLERK, BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
REQUEST FOR AGENDA OF
J '1
/; h) /?l1 Gl' ,'I ,
'-- (;J{,~jUV'lt) '- I _ ~
(j I
Agenda Item No.
not change if
This sheet is
Q!), (;/ d. ~ (5~ /I) (Note: This number does
this item is deferred to some future date.
moved forward with all of the paperwork.)
Item Name (
'lo;jl,
Presentor
(For County Executive's information, please note name of
person who will be making presentation to the Board.)
Request Made By 71Z!~/ I &,au!1"n(-J~
On ( Date) /-- .;)..;) - ? .).-i
INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE:
This form is to be used when scheduling an item for a Board
of Supervisors' agenda. This form will NOT be distributed
to anyone, but is intended only for use by the Clerk in
scheduling the agenda. Please fill out one copy of this
work sheet (it may be handwritten) and return with the orig-
inal of any paperwork you wish to have forwarded to the Board.
For Clerk's Use:
Appointment Confirmed with (name)
On (Date)
By (Name)
Telephone? Mail?
Materials Received with Request? (Yes)
(No)
Materials Photocopied?
Note: On appeal of site plans or subdivision plats, be sure
to include Planning Commission minutes with paperwork.
Form.2
..,t"n/nc.
~~Vt
~~\~
~~"i.1(.. 0 ~t-~O~
o fi1< ~t-~~~~
VJ,h, Ol~~~'J): oJ'
'{~~ q~~ ei&
~ ~I~~
Ol ' ' .:.:
~l~;, "
,'"/'
I i1'
. It. i i
i I
~I '
/ ~
I f
v
" \-..-
.'\\ '-'.
,'.',
, ,
'.
Y('
t.,', ~~"
.~ i,,: j
"
~",
,
'1' ,
i ·
" I
I' I
\,~I '
~~DI;, \, , I
. ;~'I
" ;,:1, '
I;':/> /:':'\ t"
'l. - . I
" " "I I
,I.
t\ .' !'
:"if\," ~'"
l '\ ~tj \
\~)\\ I ~
"h ,\~\\ I" j'" '~h\
\,/,11 ~'i,\,\, ~,
~ ' ' ',I 'II '(
I (I ,I. ,I
, ,l, ,~I "
I '/'", ',I I' \, \
, I". " \
,~ ':' /, \' I,
A V~ ":'\ '\
, :
,
'i
. ,.-
CONSENT AGENDA 5.11
1-22-92
(': .
. "',:.'.'i:;::::~S
G" ,~, c!:,!..~:: 4
;/~L-- ,,~...,_.._.
/ 'tl-2~"
L.
r"Jr;C ic, . 4.:<, {);.2,},y~
f'IQ,#.,.~~t I..~"" I ~~-'. "'_
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINJk~)\j,~n ,>' <,:",
January 13, 1992
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND. 23219
(......,..
t.; ~~_.' .i
The Honorable David P. Bowerman
Chairman, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Dear Mr. Bowerman:
This is in response to Chairman Bowie's letter of December
18, 1991 regarding the Route 29 Bypass and its relationship to the
proposed Agnor-Hunt Elementary School.
On December 6, 1990, this office reviewed the preliminary
plan for the proposed school site and, at that time, acknowledged
that the Alternative 10 alignment did have a direct impact on the
proposed school site. This impact was to the baseball field and
parking area on the northern side of the property. At that time,
it was also noted that it did not appear feasible to shift out of
this proposed site.
This information was forwarded to the Culpeper District
and was subsequently verbally relayed to Albemarle County.
The approved location of the Alternative 10 alignment did not
change in this area and as stated in your letter, the school site
is impacted by this corridor.
The same constraints which did not allow adjustments to the
alignment after our December, 1990 review still exist. A shift of
the alignment to the north, as suggested in your letter, would
cause a direct impact on the Rivanna River Reservoir. A shift of
the alignment through this area would also cause severe impact to
the Squirrel Ridge neighborhood. The approved alignment skirts
the southern portion of the neighborhood and a shift to the north
would sever the neighborhood. Any shift of the alignment in this
area would compromise the design of the alignment at its termini
at Route 29 north.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
efll
For these reasons, a shift to completely miss this site does
not seem possible. As we get into the design stage of this
project, we will work with the School Board and the Board of
Supervisors to minimize the impacts of this property.
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sioce~ &. ~
RaY~ ~tel. Commissioner
Copy:
The Honorable John G. Milliken