The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-02-19 ...... FINAL 7 : 00 P. M. February 19, 1992 AUDITORIUM, County Office Building 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) *Consent Agenda (on back of sheet). 6) Benton Downer: Reql1est-eofteef'ftm.g-seI'He-syst:ern-l'f'oblern-oft -f)f'ol'ef'ty-at -----Hie -eOf'ftef' -of -Rol1t:es -269 -and -249 -whe:r>e -'i'he -8alef'ie -Res!ftl1:r>ant- -was leleat:ed --fBefef'f'ed --ff'orn --Jaftl1af'y--i6, --i992h Applicant requests deferral. 7) SP-91-69. Crenshaw's Auto Service, Inc. (applicant); Charlottesville Realty Co (owner). Public Hearing on a request to locate motor vehicle sales & rental on 2.26 acs zoned C-l & EC (existing service station is to remain). Property in SE quadrant of inters of Rt 291 Greenbrier Dr. TM61W,Pl,Sec2,BlkA. Charlottesville Dist. 8) Public hearing pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-70.01 to receive comments on the 1992-98 Six Year Secondary Road Plan which includes the use of State Revenue Sharing Funds. 9) CPA-92-01. Piney Mountain. Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to expand the Piney Mountain Village boundaries to include an area for Industrial Service use. The area is east of Rt 29 North, west of Rt 600 and north of the North Fork Rivanna River. 10) Approval of Minutes: June 19, 1991, August 14, 1991 and September 11, 1991. 11) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 12) Adjourn. CON S E N T AGE N D A FOR APPROVAL: 5.1 Statements of Expenses to the State Compensation Board from the Director of Finance, Sheriff, Commonwealth's Attorney and Regional Jail for the Month of January, 1992. 5.2 Revised resolution requesting authorization for Rivanna Solid Waste Author- ity to handle the litter control program in conjunction with CAC3. 5.3 Regional Economic Development Strategic Planning Grant Application to Center on Rural Development. FOR INFORMATION: 5.4 Letter dated February 10, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, addressed to Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, Board of Supervisors, about requested information concerning the Department of Transportation's criteria for determining locations for guardrail installation along the primary system. 5.5 Letter dated February 6, 1992, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, De- partment of Transportation, stating that Wingfield Road in Ivy Farms was added to the State Secondary System effective February 3, 1992. 5.6 Letter dated February 5, 1992, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, De- partment of Transportation, stating that Inglewood Drive was added to the State Secondary System effective January 15, 1992. 5.7 Letter dated January 29, 1992, from E. C. Cochran, Jr., P. E.., State Location and Design Engineer, Department of Transportation, re:. public hearing notice on Route 708, Project: 0708-002-241, C501, Albemarle County. 5.8 Letter dated February 7, 1992, from Henry F. Weinschenk, General Part- ner, Express Car Wash, enclosing copy of application to the State Corporation Commission for Express Car Wash of Charlottesville, Inc., for a certificate as a limousine carrier. 5 . 9 Copy of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1991 for Rivanna Solid Waste Authority. (Copy on file in Clerk's office) . 5.10 Memorandum dated February 12, 1992, from Amelia M. Patterson, Zoning Administrator, re: Determination of Number of Parcels for Development Rights. 5.11 Monthly Bond Program Report on Arbor Crest Apartments for the month of January, 1992. 5.12.Memorandum stating that the Planning Commission has reviewed for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan - Route 29 Northl Airport Road Sewer Line expansion of the current septic system or connection to the Albemarle County Service Authority system. Edward H. Bain, Jr. Samuei Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R. Marshall. Jr. Scottsville David P. Bowerman Charlottesville Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Haii MEMORANDUM TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive DATE: V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning Lettie~~ ::::::~e:evpt February 20, 1992 FROM: SUBJECT: Board Actions of February 19, 1992 At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on February 19, 1992, the following actions were taken: Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. A request was made by a citizen to rename Route 640, from Cash's Corner store, to Route 22 as st. John's Road. The Board took no action on the request, but will discuss its adopted policy on road names at the March 4 Board meeting. Agenda Item No.5. 2. Revised resolution requesting authorization for Rivanna Solid Waste Authority to handle the litter control program in conjunction with CAC3. ADOPTED the attached resolution. Original resolution forwarded to Mr. Huff. Agenda Item No.5. 3. Regional Economic Development Strategic Planning Grant Application to Center on Rural Development. ENDORSED the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission's application to the Center on Rural Development for a Strategic Planning Partnership Grant and authorized the County Executive to forward a letter of support to TJPDC. Date: Page 2 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg February 20, 1992 Memo To: Agenda Item No. 5.4. Letter dated February 10, 1992, from D. S. Roose- velt, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, addressed to Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, Board of Supervisors, about requested information concerning the Department of Transportation's criteria for determining locations for guardrail installation along the primary system. MOVED to March 4 for discussion under Highway Matters. Agenda Item No.6. Benton Downer: Request concerning septic system problem on property at the corner of Routes 250 and 240 where The Galerie Restaurant was located. DEFERRED to March 18 at the request of the applicant. Agenda Item No.7. SP-91-69. Crenshaw's Auto Service, Inc. (appli- cant); Charlottesville Realty Co (owner). Public Hearing on a request to locate motor vehicle sales & rental on 2.26 acs zoned C-1 & EC (existing service station is to remain). Property in SE quadrant of inters of Rt 29/Greenbrier Dr. TM61W,P1,Sec2,BlkA. Charlottesville Dist. APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1. Use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the Architectural Review Board; and 2. storage areas shall be limited to those shown on a plat titled "Physical Survey of Lot 1, Block A, Section Two, Westfield", initialed WDF, dated 2/5/92 (attached); and the total number of vehicles available for sale or rental shall not exceed sixty-four (64) at anyone time. The Board asked the staff to look at a possible amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would provide temporary measures to accommodate a business that is in transition from one location to another location, without the business having to violate the Ordinance. The Board also asked staff to determine whether this particular request could have been addressed by a variance from the BZA. Agenda Item No.8. Public hearing pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-70.01 to receive comments on the 1992-98 Six Year Secondary Road Plan which includes the use of State Revenue Sharing Funds. ADOPTED the attached 1992-98 Six Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan. Date: Page 3 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg February 20, 1992 Memo To: Agenda Item No.9. CPA-92-01. Piney Mountain. Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to expand the Piney Mountain Village boundaries to include an area for Industrial Service use. The area is east of Rt 29 North, west of Rt 600 and north of the North Fork Rivanna River. ADOPTED the amended Map 1 for the Village of Piney Mountain Land Use (attached) and the following amendments to the "Recommendations" section of the Village of Piney Mountain: 1. An area east of Route 29 and west of the unnamed tributary of the North Fork Rivanna River is designated for industrial service. No development of properties above what is allowable under current zoning will take place until water and sewer services are provided to the area consistent with the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority and the Albemarle County Service Authority planning for the provision of services to this area. 2. Consider development proposal for the industrial area east of Route 29 under a planned development approach to allow for the coordination of public utilities and facilities, road access and necessary internalized support services. 3. Access to Route 29 for the industrial service area east of Route 29 shall be limited to the existing crossover south of the Briarwood/G. E. Fanuc crossover. A second access to the site for emergency purposes should be considered during the development review process. 4. Route 29 is a designated Entrance Corridor route. Due to the elevation of the industrial area east of Route 29 and its potential visibility from Route 29, as well as potential visibility from Route 600 and surrounding areas, development of this area will be subject to review for such visual impact. 5. An undisturbed buffer area along Herring reduce the visual impact along Route 29. perimeter of the site along steep slopes Branch should be provided Maintain natural buffers and stream valleys. to on the Mr. Bowerman requested a report from staff at the March 4 meeting on the following two recommendations from his memorandum of February 19: 1. A Board of Supervisors' sponsored initiative which invites key representa- tives from the State Economic Development Office, City Council, the Chamber of Commerce and other leaders of interest groups to view the various indus- trial locations in the County and City; and 2. Appoint a committee of two Board of Supervisors' members, two Planning Commission members and five citizens from the County to review and make recommendations concerning two items: the County's Economic Development Policy and Strategies and a Fiscal Impact Analysis of Development on Albemarle County. Date: Page 4 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg February 20, 1992 Memo To: Mr. Bowerman asked the staff to look at the feasibility of the Board and Planning Commission holding a joint public hearing on items that have a large amount of public interest. LEN: ec Attachments cc: Richard E. Huff, II Robert B. Brandenburger Roxanne White Amelia Patterson Bruce Woodzell George R. St. John File RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, recognizes the existence of litter problems within the boundaries of Albemarle County; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Waste Management Act provides, through the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling for the allocation of public funds in the form of Grants for the purpose of enhancing local litter control programs; and WHEREAS, having reviewed and considered the Regulations and the Application covering administration and use of said funds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia: Hereby expresses the intent to combine with the City of Charlottesville in a mutually agreed upon and Cooperative Program, contingent upon approval of the Application by the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling arid contingent upon receipt of funds; and Hereby authorizes the Charlottesville-Albemarle Clean Commu- ni ty Commission (CAC3) to apply on behalf of all of the above named localities for a Grant, and in conjunction with the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority (RSWA) to be responsible for the administra- tion, implementation, and completion of the program as it is described in the attached Application form LCG-1; and Further accepts liability for its pro rata share of any funds not properly used or accounted for pursuant to the Regulations and the Application; and That said funds, when received, will be transferred immedi- ately to the Charlottesville-Albemarle Clean Community Commission or if coordinated by the Planning District Commission, said funds will be sent directly to the Planning District Commission by the Department. All funds will be used in the Cooperative Program to which we give our endorsement and support. Hereby requests the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling to consider and approve the Appli- cation and Program, said Program being in accord with Regulations governing use and expenditure of said funds. * * * * * I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on February 19, 1992. ~ ~nty S ervisors Map 1: Village of-Piney ~Mountain ~nd Use ) ), ~v /1/' jr ----~\\ II/~ ~~/\\' yl?- 1/ ;/1\\ { I /' I Legend: PrOPosed. industrial. _ 'Service EXP8I:\SIOn 'Area ~. ~.a.-...t....L-1 e.__.l__ o 000 'Medium Density : 00 : R88identiaI ~l.owOenslty L-:z..3U Residential I8I Pub~JSAm~Iic. \ I " l ..,/ \. N ~ ,- \ , / \~ i ! I . j I ./' -' r . ,. / J / t Seal. In Fe.t 0 1000 2000 4000 ~ /-...... ~....,J"'.. ?~ N-....-. " j/ "d'"';.>', I' o --r~~" 1 I I u.s. THIS IS TO CClHIFY THAT ON NOVEMBEF1 30, /976,. I SURVEYED THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND THE TITLE LINES AND WALLS OF THE BUILDING ARE SHOWN HEREON. . ~A?'dL/A ~Lh.L ~ .---=- ~c;I-' , WiLli......'. 1l0UDAIU.H. JIl. C[II'T",[O LAND .UIlV[YOIl ClIlTII'ICAn: HO. Uh.TI~ 29 - N.B. L. ROUTE NJ5020'59"E /49.02' Jj:880J2'18" Rz26.6~' r'2'.98' L, of/. 18' 'V '\ '>. ,<. "- ~ ': \> C( \ , :t: : I<) C\j 't - "- 1.0 (\J () I.() " If) l.D If) ~ /A IT ACHMENTCj 16 MARKED PARKING SPACES . ~ ~ ---- (. - I. ,'. I , ,. ;10' ~, ',0 ~ /?.tP^/R. ~ t. ~ ,1\' ) .s HJ P' ~ v 1" A,' \.0 ~l ~ C) \ ~ " ~ . v, ~ 111 :;;. I'll ~ <: ~!:: ~ ~~~ - ""r... ~h: .... v,' tl) . ~ v,~ g~ "'1 'ld30 ~N1NNV1d Z661 E 1 N'1f . ~J3N:K)3li '" . ..; .., SlflVICf: S TA TIOH 60.Z' ".4( U,h' ,/" ,l, .' 'J " o y- o ' '(" . // I L\ / I r 1'1 / :,,:~~:// 1$4 / \ .' PARKING AREA 10: Jrwulc ., ! / / /(1 / i/ / . ~'t" / ~ / / / _:~c:.~)~y:_<_ ~<c~:. , .. 1- SC.YVJ<1"~ Sh.,l/.,J/;...;j r~(:'>'o.A/ r .::/''/".0 <3/.,.1.7' . ";;~~.In ...!".;-___.dx..!..?-?!~;7~- -- , . :Z - _C~ -:?_:':~~ "'~_ P~'!..':{;._~_~?:/. .llf.. ~ _X~~/ ~ /~_.-.t v r n J '21- _~~ -:! :~::/ L-' .[_...:::j'.:j"::.~_~!.L .. . / '.f ;,': ..'<./,.' / ...td C.d';n ,on J d A-f c of. t.f..,4 \.Ic.7/C/C5 (':"~r .he: /C'.J;5c~c/ J -_.:-_------- ...---- ./ - .3 - . .A1-!':.:.~.t:. ~..:/ ,E-!.. r k.~'_:'!7...:r/~c~~.' eXloS hn7 (Shd,P? dn 0.......~//, line e h.Jn.J.,) . I I .., \ /1' <'.. '- " ',' \ /' r~'~ .-"-'~ , :4) I<) 't ~ "- lO l.D () "'I 0 If) l.D IC) II) ~ (! .>;' \ . I I PHYSICAL SURVEY OF LOT I, BLOCK A, SECTION TWO "WESTFIELD" 'CHA RLOTTESVI LLE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA I ( '. /'ron fnd. / /) "/1Jf'~./ / Ar~r:L / ,/ ./'0....:..-... ../ /15.00' IrOll S., ~. S .3 6020' 59" W I I I I \ J{)O ;- 1/ tJOY tiC'." 'j nd,JcS ./.ddcd o' /!!, J.,{/7, /1'3 'r~;j;:;-- ;:'t' r:,~..JC!r /,.,t .-1 ..clc.J r..l.'/cr'.5" /1: 0<:,.:. -7/ '- .13/-r'~r. I/P_'~"/(): Id /:u.:-. 'on, ()J.,)\ ^'h--r/ I . , DATE: NOVEMBER 30,197'6 WILLIAM S. ROUDABUSH, INC. A Professional Corporation CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYORS Charlothsvlll. Virginia I 1 /1(')7...1 '7 \) il U r., : r~ Ii r~~: !'1 1:'~: ; !! ~=) ~ l.r ,.." I, . i". " .". " ~j'~U Edward H BaIn. Jr Samuei Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forresl R. Marshall. Jr Scottsville David p, Bowerman Charlottesville Charles S Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y Humphris Jack Jouell Walter F. Perkins White Hall February 20, 1992 Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt Resident Engineer Department of Transportation PO Box 2013 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Roosevelt: At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on February 19, 1992, the following actions were taken: Agenda Item No. 5.4. Letter dated February 10, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, addressed to Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, Board of Supervisors, about requested information concerning the Department of Transporta- tion's criteria for determining locations for guardrail installa- tion along the primary system. MOVED to March 4 for discussion under Highway Matters. Attached is a copy of a letter dated March 13, 1990, from Ms. Jo Ann Perkins, and your response on the same subject. Agenda Item No.8. Public hearing pursuant to Virginia Code Section 33.1-70.01 to receive comments on the 1992-98 Six Year Secondary Road Plan which includes the use of State Revenue Sharing Funds. ADOPTED the attached 1992-98 Six Year Secondary Road Improve- ment Plan. CMC LEN:ec Attachments Distributed to Board: ;;(-/4-1',). Agenda Item No. q).,. {):J, /q ~ / STATEMENTS OF EXPENSES To: For: State Compensation Board Month of -UClnllt~, /99L DEPARTMENT: County Share State Share Total. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE: ,t /~~ ff /JJ1(J,J'2- /1 Af/ti"r/' , I SHERIFF: 5b!'~ 5"'b'l( tJ ~ COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY: II ;?-~}~ //~t~ REGIONAL JAIL: 97t 9~ ~~~ 96 Note: Expenses listed above are only those office expenses in which the State Compensation Board has agreed to participate, and are not the total office expenses of these departments. ~ t; ,..., , : . .'. ; / COUN~F~~!~ARLU David p, Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 all. Jr Edward H. Bam. Jr Samuel Miller rtin Charlotte Y Humphris Jack Jouett White Hall February 24, 1992 Ms. Virginia Roy Rivanna Solid Waste Authority PO Box 979 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Ms. Roy: At its meeting on February 19, 1992, the Board of Supervi- sors adopted the attached revised resolution authorizing the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority to handle the litter control pro- gram in conjunction with CAC3. ;;l;~lY;;!5il~ Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC LEN:ec Attachment cc: Richard E. Huff, II RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, recognizes the existence of litter problems within the boundaries of Albemarle County; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Waste Management Act provides, through the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling for the allocation of public funds in the form of Grants for the purpose of enhancing local litter control programs; and WHEREAS, having reviewed and considered the Regulations and the Application covering administration and use of said funds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia: Hereby expresses the intent to combine with the City of Charlottesville in a mutually agreed upon and Cooperative Program, contingent upon approval of the Application by the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling and contingent upon receipt of funds; and Hereby authorizes the Charlottesville-Albemarle Clean Commu- ni ty Commission (CAC3) to apply on behalf of all of the above named localities for a Grant, and in conjunction with the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority (RSWA) to be responsible for the administra- tion, implementation, and completion of the program as it is described in the attached Application form LCG-1; and Further accepts liability for its pro rata share of any funds not properly used or accounted for pursuant to the Regulations and the Application; and That said funds, when received, will be transferred immedi- ately to the Charlottesville-Albemarle Clean Community Commission or if coordinated by the Planning District Commission, said funds will be sent directly to the Planning District Commission by the Department. All funds will be used in the Cooperative Program to which we give our endorsement and support. Hereby requests the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling to consider and approve the Appli- cation and Program, said Program being in accord with Regulations governing use and expenditure of said funds. * * * * * I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on February 19, 1992. ~~ ~~nty S ervisors r:f! OF t\,l ~Pll=l ,,"',..,\,ol' 2 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of County Executive 401 Mcintire Road C har\ottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5841 AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY w ; \ ;, ';,_, ' i . ,~ i j c: r ) \ ! I c: (j 1--" (00 "Jfi ~~ I. i 1_' r. ;,JI ~? l,~~t_ .~MI IJ_:__~':-:,~~.'_~_'.l Distributed to Board:" - / 4 - 9,~ Agenda Item No. 6/~. [;J 10 ~S:J ) Date: February 19, 1992 Aaenda Item #: 9), tV ~/ 9(5:;2 ) ~ Title: REVISED RESOLUTION - LITTER CONTROL GRANT Issue: The County has traditionally designated the Charlottesville-Albemarle Clean Community commission (CAC3) to administer and implement a coordinated litter control program using grant funds recei ved from the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling. Effective February 1, 1992, the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority began administering the program on behalf of CAC3 which necessitates Albemarle County to revise the resolution as attached to authorize RSWA to handle the program in conjunction with CAC3. Please note that the underlined portion is the only change from the original resolution. Recommendation: Adopt the revised resolution as attached. Staff contactCs): Messrs. Tucker and Huff. RWT,Jr/dbm 92.014 DRAFT RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, recognizes the existence of litter problems within the boundaries of Albemarle County; and WHEREAS, the virginia Waste Management Act provides, through the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling for the allocation of public funds in the form of Grants for the purpose of enhancing local litter control programs; and WHEREAS, having reviewed and considered the Regulations and the Application covering administration and use of said funds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia: Hereby expresses the intent to combine with the City of Charlottesville in a mutually agreed upon and Cooperative Program, contingent upon approval of the Application by the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling and contingent upon receipt of funds; and Hereby authorizes the Charlottesville-Albemarle Clean Commu- ni ty Commission (CAC3) to apply on behalf of all of the above named localities for a Grant, and in conjunction with the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority (RSWA) to be responsible for the administra- tion, implementation, and completion of the program as it is described in the attached Application form LCG-l; and Further accepts liability for its pro rata share of any funds not properly used or accounted for pursuant to the Regulations and the Application; and That said funds, when received, will be transferred immedi- ately to the Charlottesville-Albemarle Clean Community Commission or if coordinated by the Planning District Commission, said funds will be sent directly to the Planning District Commission by the Department. All funds will be used in the Cooperative Program to which we give our endorsement and support. Hereby requests the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling to consider and approve the Appli- cation and Program, said Program being in accord with Regulations governing use and expenditure of said funds. * * * * * Distributed to Board: d - 14 - 7',-2 . c~ /:"l c.fc:- ;\ Agenda Item No. 1, . 0.711 ( '~.J'_J) COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296.5823 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aqenda Item: Consent Agenda - For Approval Title: Regional Economic Development Strategic Planning Issue: Strategic Planning Grant Application to Center on Rural Development (CORD) Backqround: This subject was reviewed with you verbally at your February 12, 1992 meeting. You asked that written information be provided for your February 19, 1992 Consent Agenda. Discussion: The enclosed memos and sample resolution were presented to the Thomas Jefferson Planning District (TJPDC) Board at its February 6, 1992 meeting and discussed with you last week. It appropriately summarizes informal discussions that have occurred over the past several months among various regional representatives. It also outlines a mechanism to receive assistance in pursuing regional economic development strategic planning through the CORD. The TJPDC Board endorsed this initiative. Also enclosed is some information on CORD and its grant process. Recommendation: Staff believes a cooperative regional economic development effort that provides an interchange of ideas and attempts to identify strategic policies and actions is important to the County and the region's future economy. Staff recommends the Board endorse the application for CORD assistance and authorize the County Executive or Chairman to forward a letter of support to TJPDC. Staff Contact(sl: Bob Brandenburger, Wayne Cilimberg. ~ ~~~~= (~J 1/~.7,;Z101-52f3 ~ YH/'P-J720 ~ . . .. . -- / ,,--t711VnUA:KU-P rt./ February 6, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Commission FROM: Nancy O'Brien, Executive Director SUBJ: strategic Planning Grant Application to Center on Rural Development There has been interest in the planning district for coordinating economic development regionally. The impetus for this regional planning has come from a working group, called the Regional Ad Hoc Economic Development Committee. Representation on this Committee includes the Chambers of Commerce in Charlottesville/Albemarle, Greene, Fluvanna and Nelson, the Industrial Development Authority for the City of Charlottesvil~e, the Albemarle County Planning Department, the University of Virginia and Piedmont Virginia Community College. staff for each locality in the Planning District have also been aprised of this Committee's work. At a meeting on February 5, 1992, the Committee reviewed the economic development strengths and weaknesses of the region and concluded that each locality wishing to coordinate economic development regionally could benefit from this coordination. By first clarifying the specific economic development needs and wishes for each locality, it is felt that a regional economic development strategy could be developed that articulates the economic development interests of the region in a manner that preserves local interests, yet will allow for regional coordination to the betterment of each locality. One method .to achieve this regional perspective for economic development is to apply to the Center on Rural Development (CORD) for a strategic Planning Grant that will bring staff resources to the region to develop a regional vision on economic development. The Ad Hoc Economic Development Committee has asked the Planning District to investigate a CORD application and to sponsor an application, should the region's governing bodies wish to participate. Planning District staff can prepare a grant application for submission by February 28, 1992. Enclosed is a draft Resolution of Support for this grant application. The Commission may wish to have the resolution contingent on formal agreement by each governing body in the Planning District. A~ ~ J ~) J~ C~.<<!f' rj~ (~~ Z~ (~, N~~:'~ ~ ~ 0) s ~ / 0 / C I ( '" c - o u 0) - ... >. u u u c...C/l > ; - U I ~ .~ o - ._ ::I 0.) > u u ~ tJ.J 1/ ~ / / --f c:: 0 ;.... ro ...... 0 - C) ...... ~ ..c: u C) C/.) ;.... ~ .- :::0 00 v ~ :) ~ 0.) ~ ~ Q) :J / 7 "0 - - '" ... <I) 0 b t>O '" N c:: - -< ~ >. c:: .:: u u 0 '- c... UJ 1/ / / c:: c u .- S ... 0.. - '" 0 <I) :E 0 '" '" :> u u ..c: Cl u - 0.. c:: -;; C/l >. U ... ::I a:: / / / - c:: o E c:: 0..- :> 0 .~ ... ~ -; ..... > -- _ u u .- Cl ~ co_C/l '" ... ::I a:: / / 7 1 E c:: '" 0 ..c: E t>O 0.. - ..s~ u '" .... ~ 'u co 0 ~ t>O _ C/l U '" .... .... O~ / / / - c:: o ~ C .c Co.._ o CQ u '" en ~ : :: 0 <I) ..:::-< - '" .... ::I a:: 1/ "' II CENfER ON RURAL DEVELOP1\1ENT CORD II WHAT IS RURAL DEVELOPMENT? Rural Development is the achievement of economic vitality through a community's action of determining and implementing a set of interrelated strategies for meeting the economic and social needs of its citizens. HOW DOES CORD FIT INTO RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN VIRGINIA: WHAT IS CORD'S MISSION? CORD's Mission is to enhance the ability of communities to achieve economic vitality while preserving rural values. WHAT EXACTLY IS "ECONOMIC VITALITY?" It is the economic state resulting from a community's optimum use of its unique set of human, fiscal and physical resources. HOW WILL CORD ACIDEVE ITS MISSION? * It will foster and support innovation in rural communities through: - Strategic Planning Partnership - Information and Analysis of Critical Rural Issues - CORD Innovation Grants * Enhance the delivery of state and federal services and resources to ~urallocalities. * Increase Executive and Legislative awareness of the issues facing rural localities. * Ensure that rural issues are on the policy agenda in Richmond. * Influence rural policy decisions made by the Executive and the General Assembly. Center on Rural Development · 205 N. Fourth Street. 9th Roor. Richmond,VA 23219. (804) 371-2665 CORD STRATEGIC PLANNING PARTNERSIDPS PROGRAM GUIDELINES Introduction Program Concept Strategic planning is a systematic approach to managing and directing change. CORD uses this approach to assist local leaders in the preparation of rural development action plans. Strategic planning does not seek to replace other types of community planning but rather, attempts to integrate a broad range of activities designed to address identified needs. CORD will be using its Strategic Planning Partnerships to assist rural areas with . developing a vision for the future; · identifying opportunities and impediments to pursuing community goals; and · preparing an action plan designed to stimulate and guide efforts to achieve local objectives. The Center on Rural Development assists participating localities in forming and organizing a local community forum representing a cross-section of knowledge and interests. The Strategic Planning Partnerships include a framework for conducting the strategic planning process. The program progresses through a sequence of twelve meetings - seven with all forum participants and five for each individual task force. Two speakers with identified expertise on key local issues will be invited to address the forum. The anticipated process time is six to twelve months depending on local needs and desires. Policies Eligible Participants Any rural county, city, or town is eligible to apply for participation in the Strategic Planning Partnerships. Rural areas generally include all Virginia localities except the obvious urban areas within the state's urban crescent. However, final determinations will be considered on a case- by-case basis. Preference will be given to multijurisdictional applications. Funding Through the CORD Innovation Grant Program, applicants may apply for up to $5,000 to help defray costs associated with conducting meetings and preparing the action plan. The FY 92 deadline for Innovation Grant applications is pecember 6, 1991. Program Schedule The CORD Strategic Planning Partnerships selection process will consist of two application cycles. Three applican.t localities will 'be selected in each cycle. The deadline for submission of applications in cycle one is December 6, 1991. The announcements for cycle one Strategic Planning Partnerships will be made by mid-January 1992. The deadline for submission of applications in cycle two is February 28, 1992. The announcement for cycle two Strategic Planning Partnerships will be made in mid-April 1992. Project Ranking Applications for Strategic Planning Partnerships will be reviewed and ranked on a competitive basis. Ranking categories include: number of jurisdictions involved, long-range planning needs, existing long-range planning efforts, current and anticipated level of citizen involvement, anticipated benefits, and evidence of current and potential positive change. APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS General Instructions All eligible localities submitting an application must use the forms provided by CORD. No other forms or format will be accepted. All questions must be answered within the space provided on the Application forms. Attachments will be accepted only where they are specifically requested or allowed. All applications should be typewritten. Letters of Local Community Support Letters of local community support may be included as attachments to the application. Letter of Endorsement or Resolution from Applicant Locality(s) A letter of endorsement or resolution of support from each applicant locality(s) must be submitted as an attachment to the application. The original completed application forms and five duplicate copies along with the requested or allowed attachments should be submitted to: William C. Shelton Center on Rural Development 205 N. Fourth Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 All Applications for cycle one must be delivered in person or postmarked by certified mail no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 6, 1991. All Applications for cycle two must be delivered in person or postmarked by certified mail no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 28, 1992. CORD INNOVATION GRANTS The Center on Rural Development's Innovation Grant Program is designed to stimulate and assist creative and innovative local approaches to rural development. What type of projects are eligible for funding? Implementation or pilot projects and planning or feasibility studies that use innovative approaches to rural development and enhance or support the economic vitality of rural areas are eligible. How much funding is available? Maximum award is $40,000 for pilot implementation projects and $20,000 for planning or feasibility studies. $350,000 is available for distribution. Grants may fund a maximum of 75% of project. The local community must match (in- kind or cash) at least 20% of the CORD grant. What rural issues should the grants address? Possible topics for projects include workforce training, rural educational innovation, regional approaches to rural problems, agricultural diversification, non-traditional economic development, and strategic planning. How will applications be evaluated? Projects must have documented community support. Additionally, they will be evaluated on their ability to serve as a model approach to rural development, the innovativeness of the project, the impact on community need, and the capacity of the applicant to successfully complete the project. Who may apply? Eligible grant recipients are limited to local governments, regional planning district commissions, and regional or local non-profit community based organizations. Grant recipients may be in partnership with the private sector, academic institutions, or the federal government. Where are applications available? Contact Eileen Fitzgerald at 804-371-2662 for an application. When are applications due? Applications must be postmarked by December 6, 1991. ~ ~t1:::;;d!)~ c~ (~, 1/~;l,;<101-52f3 ~ 7H'/ 'P-J72o MEMO TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Chairman and Members of the Commission Nancy K. O'Brien, Executive Director ~~ Regional Economic Development strategic Planning Grant February 3, 1992 A group of local staff, Chamber of Commerce members, and University development people have met several times to explore the possibilities of regional economic development planning. You may recall staff bringing this to your attention in December. The group has expanded to include all jurisdictions in the PDC and is planning to submit a grant for strategic planning in the PDC for economic development. The funds available are limited to $5,000, but the state provides staff assistance in bringing the groups together and developing a strategic planning process for the region to work on. The group that has been meeting is very interested in the staff assistance from the state. The funds will just cover mailings and meeting support, not extensive staff work. The proposal is being developed over the next week. We are asking your approval of the grant submittal and passage of a resolution stating this support. 1 /f)-/r~ C~ J ~.A/~2.J;f ) Jknu~~ C..u~j, 11a4U Cu,r~. Z~ (~, N~C~ .. ~~~tD~ 17 1-13~~~ ~jt1.Z (~J 1/~~10j-5.zf3 ~ fJlt/'P-J1-ZP ~ . . -. . ~- / ,,--v~r{/ RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR APPLICATION TO CENTER ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT FOR STRATEGIC PLANNING PARTNERSHIP GRANT Whereas, economic development plays an important role in the vitality of the region, and Whereas, each jurisdiction in the Thomas Jefferson Planning District has specific economic development needs and wishes, and Whereas, the region would benefit from an economic development vision that embraces the specific needs and wishes of each participating locality, and Whereas, regional coordination of economic development will benefit each participating locality through the sharing of the region's strengths and available resources, Therefore be it resolved that, the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission does endorse application to the Center on Rural Development for a Strategic Planning Partnership Grant to assist in the coordination of the region's economic development needs. Chairman Date A~ c~J C/~-J J~- ("u~~1' iKVn( C~j. L~ (4, N~ullC~ DATE ~/;jU<~ /9, /77.2 AGENDA ITEM NO. tJ;z. ,j;2 Ie; /..L y) AGENDA ITEM NAME /?f 02YJ / 7""-tl/}M tJAJ DEFERRED UNTIL I/h arrj~ 4- (r J5td5',." /4 'lJ'h, ;0'~ /~ ;71-t. /-2/~AA/' Form. 3 7/25/86 RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER Disln'buted 10 lloard, E.-/~ ;:?t Agenda Item No. f~, O'c~/C( "5 5) '."'" ' < ~ , ..~ :" ,( "f\( C:' ~- .."'" ",~ - t :'~ ,.:~:.. f COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA I I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION II 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND,23219 1 I ['1"--:" February 6, 1992 1:,'1 " < ~"'; ::. .\ Secondary System Addition Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated December 4, 1991, the following addition to the Secondary System of Albemarle County is hereby approved, effective February 3, 1992. ADDITION LENGTH IVY FARMS Route 1017 (Wingfield Road) - From Route 1018 to 0.83 mile Northeast Route 1018 (! ~ ' 0JI'liijUIJ /) jann I J .:2 L-tinl.0j r~J/,U-/ 0.83 Mi Sincerely, ~Jfl~ 'y D. Pethtel Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY .:1 \ ~ ~ j ! . \ , . i ....) Distributed to Board: ~~ - ) 4 - q ,~ Agenda Item No. q).. () ,~ / Cj (5. CJ) I'''':; 't"' ,:-"'.7 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA ."'~ ::.~ RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND. 23219 February 5, 1992 Secondary System Addition Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated December 19, 1990, the following addition to the Secondary System of Albemarle County is hereby approved, effective January 15, 1992. ADDITION LENGTH GEORGETOWN LANE Route 1411 (Ing1ewood Drive) - From Route 1430 to 0.09 mile Southeast Route 1430 0.09 Mi Sincerely, I!z~.p::~ Commissioner Cc I f'jl t~V)~ IOI~l'n~1 '2o~~~o f)~~ TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER ""i"{ C)F tAd3EM.:~_lt. r,{) \J \ ., '--\ n'1. ...... \ C'I' ~._.~, \ \ \ ,(, \ \, \+-::~\ t';:~'; ; !....~i ..' '.........'\ \ \ '\ I, \; l,.\~."" \\ t COMMONWEALTH of VIRG~_".' I. D;::~~\ L ',.,\",':::J. \........' ",.:;)CRV1SOqS n ~:;u \ ,-. ~j D. S. ROOSEVELT RESIDENT ENGINEER !!- -/7'- i/~ 9-:':'1.()1i.11 ( ::,-, 7 ) '\ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902 February 6, 1992 Route 708 Project: 0708-002-241, CS01 Albemarle County Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Miss Neher: Attached is a letter and copy of the Public Hearing Notice on the above project. Please advise the Board of this hearing. Yours truly, ~/&~4 A ajJ. Gerald G. Utz Contractor Administrator GGU/yrm attachment TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY f'~. -..' , ,', 1\' I' COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI~/\ U ",,,\ ~ ('(\1' \.1 ~." I...' I ~, /' C:,' ~.~ ./\ L. f3 f~ r\~ l\ r~ t- t~. i' ;,' :!. \1 \) 1992 ~11~ I! " I ill I, I' \ LJ \- RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902 U U: ~,Ur'l:J~\//iSO~S D. S. ROOSEVELT RESIDENT ENGINEER February 6, 1992 Location & Design Public Hearing Route 708 Project: 0708-002-241, C501 From: 0.14 Mi. E. Route 631 To : 0.09 Mi. Y. Route 631 Albemarle County Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Boardmembers: This is to inform you of and invite you to attend a Location & Design Public Hearing on Thursday, March 12, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. at the Mt. Olivet United Methodist Church located at the intersection of Routes 708 and 631 in Albemarle County. The purpose of this public hearing will be to consider the proposed location and design of Route 708 from 0.14 miles east of Route 631 to 0.09 miles west of Route 631 in Albemarle County. If interested individuals or groups would like to discuss this proposed project with Transportation Department personnel before the hearing, they are encouraged to be present at the above location immediately preceding the hearing from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. for an informal review of available information. Yours truly, ~JR~~..~~\v D. S. Roosevelt Resident Engineer DSR/yrm cc: Mr. T. F. Farley TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY LD-6-92 PUB L I C NOT ICE PROPOSED HIGHWAY PROJECT ROUTE 708 (TAYLORS GAP ROAD) ALBEMARLE COUNTY Representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) will hold a Location and Design Public Hearing on Thursday, March 12, 1992, at 7:30 p.m. at the Mt. Olivet United Methodist Church located at the intersection of Routes 708 and 631 in Albemarle County. VDOT representatives will also be present at the Mt. Olivet United Methodist Church immediately preceding the hearing from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. for an informal review of available information by interested ci tizens. All interested persons are encouraged to review the proposal prior to the formal hearing. The purpose of this Public Hearing will be to consider the proposed location and design of Route 708 (Taylors Gap Road) from 0.14 mile east of Route 631 to 0.09 mile west of Route 631 in Albemarle County. At this location and design public hearing, relocation assistance programs and tentative schedule for right of way acquisition and construction will also be discussed. All interested parties are urged to attend and give the their comments and suggestions relative to the proposed highway improvement. Maps, drawings, and other information are available for public review in the Department of Transportation's District Office located on Business Route 15, just south of Route 3, in Culpeper and in its Residency Office located on Route 250, 3.0 miles east of Charlottesville. Written statements and other exhibits relative to the proposed project may be presented in place of, or in addition to, oral statements at the hearing. Such written statements and e xhi bi ts may also be s ubm i t ted tot he Department at any time within ten days after the public hearing. Individuals requiring special assistance to attend and participate in this meeting should contact the Charlottesville Resident Engineer at (804) 296-5102. '-ft.,. Virgin I. Dopo"....n. ot Tr.n_".lI.. January 29, 1992 I f ~ ..c:" ~"\ c~ ~~ ~ HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ROUTE 708 (TAYLORS GAP ROAD) ALBEMARLE COUNTY PROJECT: 0708-002-241 ,C-SO 1 FROM: 0.144 MI. E. RTE. 631 TO: 0.089 MI. W. RTE. 631 LENGTH: 0.211 MILE I ; ; O. I 2 Miles ,...... y;~... _...... 01 T_"".1on " Distributed to Board: ,) - J ./ ' ~;) Agenda Item No. (l~ < D::l1 q (s;s) 7k.~~P~l. EXPAfS'~ ~ IIDDCJL TM ~ CHARLOTTESVILLE ROUTE 29 NORTH HAMPTON WEST MERCURY BOULEVARD (804) 978-1088 (804) 826-8359 February 7, 1992 f":''''. """, ,"\ : ,",.., 11 , It I I: ! I 1.J ri.:'."? ~ '\ B F i\/l..~. R Lt nil ; \1 : i ,) ; i i; .: ',,':::) C(V IhIT\! nr-\_ J '-.j 1,)!'" .. '\..; Honorable David P. Bowerman Chairman, Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596 r',' f' ,', r.> !'\", f'" () '\.) t "\ r I Lj t...' r ~-... ',> i' :~..; . ",0\ '..' C; ;.'~ S RECEIPT REGISTERED MAIL Reference: Application for limousine carrier authority. In accordance with an order of the State Corporation Commission of the Commonwealth of Virginia, issued on January 29, 1992, pertaining to case No. MCS910133; I am hereby providing you with a true copy of said order. Sincerely, EXPRESS CARWASH of Charlottesville,L.P. . .( f\ ~. I r.- t" ,. L ' \ ;' '",~.! '. \.:1 :. J) ,., ",,', " ...' \ I!\ji~t ~ -VI :\VV::(/'\V1l Henry F.We~nschenk General Partner Enclosure HFW/ms GENERAL OFFICE: P,O, BOX 5726, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22905-0726 . TELEPHONE (804) 978-7159 r" .. .... COMMONWEALTHOFVIRG~ 2 0 STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION 1 4 00 04 OOCU~€NT CONTROl CENTE~ 1992 JAN 29 PH 4: '.9 , 't4."" f"~; , -: r. v , AT RICHMOND, JANUARY 29, 1992 APPLICATION OF EXPRESS CARWASH OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, LP CASE NO. MCS910133 For a certificate as a limousine carrier AMENDING ORDER IT ~.PPE1'.1HNG to the Commission that by order dated October 2, 1991, notice of this Application was to have been mailed to certified limousine carriers, the mayor or principal officers of any city or town and/or the chairman of the board of supervisors of every county in which the Applicant maintains offices and it was to have provided notice of this Application by publication in a newspaper by October 30, 1991. No mailing or pUblication was made by the Applicant. IT NOW APPEARING that the Applicant has requested for good cause shown, that the time for providing' public notice of this Application be extended; accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: (1) That on or before February 24, 1992, the Applicant shall serve a true copy of this order on: (a) the mayor or principal officer of each city or town and/or the chairman of the board of supervisors of every county in which the Applicant maintains offices; and (b) every certified limousine carrier in the area to be served, as shown by Appendix A attached hereto. Service shall be made by receipted registered mail or by first- class mail, to the last known address of the person to be t' .. r- 'I. served. If service is effected by first-class mail, proof of service shall be verified by an affidavit submitted by the Applicant certifying compliance with this paragraph; (2) That any person who desires to file a written comment on, object to or request a formal hearing on the Application, shall file, on or before March 20, 1992, an original and fifteen . (15) copies of said comments, objections or requests with the Clerk, state Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.o. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216, and simultaneously send a copy thereof to Richard Howard-Smith, Esquire, 530 East Main street, P.o. Box 2057, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-2057; (3) That the Applicant shall, on or before February 24, 1992, publish the following notice in a newspaper having general circulation in the area or areas where the Applicant maintains offices: PUBLIC NOTICE Notice is hereby given that Express Carwash of Charlottesville, LP has made application for certificate as a limousine carrier pursuant to Title 56 Chapter 12.8 of the Code of Virginia (1950). A description of the authority applied for may be obtained by writing Judy A. McPherson, Deputy Director, Motor Carrier Division (Rates and Tariffs), P.O. Box 1158, Richtwnd, Virginia 23219 or by telephoning (804) 786-3683. Any person who desires to file a written comment on, object to, or request a formal hearing on the Application, shall file on or before March 20, 1992, an original and fifteen (15) copies of said comments, objections or requests with the Clerk of the State Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, RiChmond, Virginia 23216, and simultaneously send a copy to Richard Howard-Smith, I:squire, 530 East Main Street, P.O. Box 2057, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-2057. 2 f' -:;. -. " (4) That an attested copy of this Order shall be mailed by the Clerk of the Commission to Richard Howard-Smith, 530 East Main Street, P.O. Box 2057, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-2057; Henry F. Weinschenk, P.O. Box 5726, Charlottesville, Virginia 22905-0762; and to Judy A. McPherson, DE~puty Director, Motor Carrier Division (Rates and Tariffs). A True Coov ~. '""'. !:,,~). ~ .' r\ '.,\.~- ""-F~ .~, V. T@st@i . Clerk of the ..., . .'" State Corporation Commission . ~_. 3 ~-.,. ,-..' ~\ '. APPENDIX A i .. .. .. LXMOUIIKB ~..I." IX-97 JOMph S. caBle Accenu LiItouaine. Service Poe~ office Box 35 ari9b~voo4, virginia 22715 Jia earth LbowIine and Tranaportation Coapany JtGute 13, Box 19 Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 G .. of Virginia, Incorporated 41 R.V. Parkway Prec:lericltabur9, Virginia 22405 J. J. lfikit.akia , CO., Inc. 'r/A Sophia S1:r_t C&teru. 503 sophia street Prec:lericltabur9, Virginia 22041 J , B Enterpri..., Inc. 220 Main stre.t Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 IX-l IX-74 IX-52 IX-167 ....----.-_.__..__...---~_._---_.~~_..-.. .'.... ....._. .-- .---.-..---..--...-..--.. ...-----..- ;~---_.--_.. --:",,-,.~.-....,.__. ---..... Distributed to Board:;; - / 4 . 9c) en 'I ~ (.cc) Agenda Item No. k:'\' (;~-7\ I If ,.1. '/ ~;,ll>-\<~,& SE~,p 'Vc;. <' '{, ~ .'l6 ~ ~ ~ V; o..~ ..;.t- ~OTTESV\l\.<' ,. RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY P. O. BOX 18 . CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 2290~"0018 . (804) 977-2970 February 6, COUNTY OF ALBEMA,RlE ~:l r...."" ......... r""'" . 1 .....1....<1 .'C' n" ,,- "_,,.,'.:.,,; t 111 I ). ~ _f ... rJi.JJ......,t....,. """\"",,,C.JJ. III .1 $, :t . '\ I /' f"i. \ ~FR '( 1992 \11 I : !', \ \ . - - '. " '; 'f\_,...."..,.. .. . II 19L"l! I ". '.'. '.. ''''''''~''--''''/l "U M"'I ,. ... ", " 1....1 ",. Ill!:=; .. ..., ,......J \~ '" ....:' ""1' . . ...... .......... h..; h (.. . BOAF?O 'OoF SUPERV1SOiiS Miss Estelle Neher, Clerk Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Mi~eher: ~~ Enclosed for your information and use is a copy of our "Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1991" for Rivanna Solid Waste Authority. Sincerely, &/( William Sessoms Director of Administration SERVING CHARLOTTESVILLE 8< ALBEMARL.E COUNTY 1"\' .}h~ ~ o^,..," ..;;.... 4 ~'i2 n 1~15JtF,. ~" li,,; \ , . C..J~....'1 '..../... .....t. ....J~-.::~.n.,.?i,J,.. /lii- .,1 ",~:nda ltf:fll."!o. ....(X I ()" / 1 ';j./Oj .,....~~E~>'~,,~~~,,{L,_ ..~L_ ,>L.,,.;\,;' '';! COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE J992 :;:-. .~ !;l , ici; ~t ,..__,J EXi.:.CUiTI::: OFFiCe.: MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive Amelia M. Patterson, Zoning Administrator~~Y February 12, 1992 Determination of Number of Parcels for Development Rights Last February, when the Board withdrew ZTA 90-13, the zoning text amendment relating to parcel of record determinations, they requested a monitoring report. The purpose of this memo is to forward this information. A review of the determinations made after the adoption of the February, 1991 criteria shows a marked decrease in the numbers of additional parcels found. You may recall that the new criteria arose from the Blandemar case, with the Faison v. Union Camp Virginia Supreme Court as a basis. Although the Blandemar decision by the Board of Zoning Appeals is currently under Circuit Court review, I believe that the criteria from the Supreme Court will remain in place for these determinations. This criteria considers the language used by the owner in the descriptive clause of the deed, such as "all that certain tract of land". A complete chart has been compiled of all determinations beginning in November, 1990. The relevant statistics are as follows: I. From November, 1990 to the present - 35 determinations were requested for 47 parcels. (Several determinations involved more than one tax map parcel.) These resulted in a total of 57 additional parcels by determinations than are shown by a number on the tax maps. This is a rate of 1.55 additional: 1 existing parcel. II. From February, 1991 to the present - 21 determinations were requested for 27 parcels. These resulted in a total of 26 additional parcels by determinations than are shown by a number on the tax maps. This is a rate of 0.96 additional: 1 existing parcel. I hope this information is useful. If any additional information or comments are necessary, please let me know. A AT~ Distributed to Board: c;/ -/4 (i) Aaeoda Item No li'J-., C ,/~ ( (de;; (I) 111 South~Calvert Street . Suite 1540 Baltimore, Maryland 21202 410-659-7.,5,.00, . '_.~U NI '( () F f\LE;EMA.Rtr~ fi~) I '-'Or r".: .. j! . .. (, ; 'J ::) i-~' r-:. '. /~ C r~ . "-h.,.,,] c.h V '~~'\..J~tt.::~ .. '. ~,. ; ... !~K February 12, 1992 ~-l .."' ,. c.t)/~ . Mr. Bob Richardson Sovran Bank, N.A. Post Office Box 26904 Richmond, Virginia 23261 Re: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) Dear Mr. Richardson: Enclosed please find the Bond Program Report and Monthly Report Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions for the month of January 1992. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 410-659-7500. Sincerely, /\ - I . d~jt~Jtc vt{ ,vYVlfkt/~/Vt~ Sheila H. Moynihan U Project Monitor jshm enclosures c c: "'_."';;l>&e~t.t'i._jJ~,r/1' Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Albemarle County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 .. It. BONO PROGRAM Rf.PORT Month January y 1992 M'_ Property: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) l " Charlottesville, VA O(I.lon: Submlntd by: Loretta Wyatt M.n.a~r Project .: Numbet 01 Units February 5, 1992 O.T. Total Occupied Bond Occupied 051-35371 66 Effective 1/31/92 I. LOWE" INCOME 66 15 The lallowlng untts hive been designated as "lower Incom". units 1 Arbor Crest Dr. 21 Eleanor Blair 41 el. 2 4 Arbor Crest Dr. 22 Margaret Q. Sandf or~2 62. 3 5 Arbor Crest Dr. 23 Fannie G. Tisdale 43 63. 6 Arbbr Crest Dr. 24 George C. Barnett 4 44 eA. S 9 Arbor Crest Dr. 25 Virginia Burton 45 6~. 6 12 Arbor Crest Dr. 26 G. Robert Stone 46 68. 7 . 15 Arbor Crest Dr. 21 Jane Wood 41 67. a 20 Arbor Crest Dr. 25 Evelyn Mandeville 48 6a 9 24 Arbor Crest Dr. 29 Gertrude Breen 49 69. 10 78 Arbor Crest Dr. 30 Ernese M. Nease 50 10. 84 Arbor Crest Dr. 31 Juanita Boliek 11 51 71. 12. 86 Arbor Crest Dr. 32 Mary A. Hoxie ~2 72. 13 90 Arbor Crest Dr. 3J Florence Wheeler ~J 73. 14 94 Arbor Crest Dr. 34 Sarah E. Fischer 54 14. IS 106 Arbor Crest Dr. 35 Katherine T. Nowlen 55 75. 16 36 ~ 76. 11 37 57. 77. lit 38 ~. 78. 19 39 ~9 78. ~'O 40 60 80. T /'\e Chan~s 'rom prev.ous repOfl ,,.lIecled in th. .bov. hslang Ire O.lellona AddlUone .t- H 1.- 11. 2 12 2 12. 3 13 3. 13. 4 14 4. 14. 5 15 5 lS. 6 16 6 18. 7 \1 7 17. I 18 8. 18.. t 19 9 It. 10 20 10. 20. . Effective January 31, 1992 MONTHLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 7(a) OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS TO: ABG Associates, Inc. 300 E. Lombard Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 RE: Hydraulic Road Apartments - Aroor Crest Apa.rt:Irents Charlottesville, Virginia Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions (the "Deed Restrictions"), as defined in an Indenture of Trust dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Authority"), and your bank, as trustee, the undersigned authorized representative of Richmond-Albemarle Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership (the "Purchaser"), hereby certifies with respect to the operation and management of Hydraulic Road Apartments, Charlottesville, Virginia (the "Project"), that as of the date shown below: 1) The number of units in the Project occupied by lower income tenants is 15 . 2) The number of units in the Project unoccupied and held available for Lower Income Tenants is -0- 3) The number of units rented and the number of units held available for rental other than as described in (1) and (2) is 51 . 4) The percentage that the number of units described in (1) and (2) hereof constitute of the total number of units in the Project is 23%. 5) The information contained in this report is true, accurate and correct as of the date hereof. 6) As of the date hereof, the Purchaser is not in default under any covenant or agreement contained in the Deed Restrictions or in an Agreement of Sale dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Authority and the Purchaser. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the unde,~~j~ned has signed this Report as of February 5, 1992 om RICHMOND-ALBEMARLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia limited partnership '-// - ",A, - By: 0\ ~ a./ "j/ If A-fa..LA- Authorized Representative Distributed to Board: ::< - /4 -1) Agenda Item No. Cf;J.,. O,}, / 9(5. I z) " COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of County Executive 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5841 AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE r~ rr r,,~ 1"':\:::1 n liJlr n \ Ij~;;"JJ";;;' J ,";.\"U..~ u.l. , ;If , (; "'FR' L t. ! \\ t'., o- j \ . '\)'41 . Ii ','. "\ \ '\"."'\".(::r:rn'::'rl~. t.:: W' ,,-,.,~ \. ~. i...:,,;-J U 80AR'OOF SUPERVISOliS Aaenda Item #: [lei.OJlq&.&i) CONSENT AGENDA - FOR INFORMATION Title: Compliance with Comprehensive Plan - Route #29/Airport Road Sewer Line Issue: The Albemarle County Service Authority's sewer line installation to serve the Route 29/Airport Road area must be reviewed for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Backaround: The waste treatment needs of the expanded Airport necessitates an expansion of their current septic system or connection to the Albemarle County Service Authority system. Costs and limited service life of a new septic system indicated connection to the sewer line as the best alternative but extending service required a review for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission, at its February 11, 1992 meeting, unanimously found the attached request to be in compliance as per Section 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia. Recommendation: None -- provided for information. Staff Contact(s): Cilimberg. Messrs. Robert W. Tucker, Jr. and V. Wayne RWT, Jr/dbm 92.015 Attachment ~ STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION PREVIEW CONSENT AGENDA: PLANNING COMMISSION CONSENT AGENDA: KENNETH M. BAKER JANUARY 28, 1992 FEBRUARY 11, 1992 REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (15.1-456 REVIEW): ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY (ACSA) SEWER LINE INSTALLATION TO SERVE THE ROUTE 29/AIRPORT ROAD AREA As per Section 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia the Albemarle County Service Authority has requested that the Planning Commission review the installation of a sewer line to serve the Route 29/Airport Road area, including the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport (See Attachment A). The newly expanded airport is now currently served by a septic system, and the existing septic needs to be replaced with a larger system to accommodate the expansion. Cost estimates for a new septic system are $100,000. The Health Department has indicated a life expectancy of a new septic system would be five to seven years based on soil characteristics and experience with similar previous systems. The installation of a sewer line would eliminate the need for a septic system. The sewer line begins at the Powell Creek Interceptor in Forest Lake and extends 7,000 feet northwest to the airport property (See Attachment B). The sewer line is sized adequately to serve the entire airport area drainage basin, including the airport, Deerwood subdivision and the properties designated for industrial and office service south of Route 649 and east of Route 606 (See Attachment C). The properties to be served are within the Albemarle County Service Authority jurisdictional area for water and sewer service (See Attachment D). Wastewater originating from this area will be treated at the Moores Creek treatment plant. The downstream lines are sized adequately to handle the additional wastewater flow that will be generated by the installation of this new line. The Comprehensive Plan recommends the following concerning utility improvements: 1. Extension of Powell Creek Sewer Interceptor and development of necessary collection lines to accommodate development in the Route 29 North/Airport Road area, the airport and the northern residential areas of Hollymead south of Route 649 (p. 184). 2. Provide public water and sewer service to the Urban Area and Community (p.146). 3. Build all public water and sewer facilities to ultimate design capacity with the recommended land use densities in the Comprehensive Plan and coordinate with the timing of development (page 152). 1 . 4. Water and sewer jurisdictional areas provide the implementing measures for directing utilities according to the Land Use Plan and overall growth management policies. They also permit these services to be provided in a manner which can be supported by the utilities physical and financial capabilities (p. 146). staff opinion is that the installation of the proposed sewer line satisfies the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and recommends favorable action be taken by the Commission to find the sewer line in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 2 , IATTACHMENT AI . ACBE"MARLE20UNTY SERVleE AUTHORITY. P.O, Box l009 40l MciNTIRE RD. CHARLOTIESVILLE, VA. 22902 (804) 296-58l0 January 14, 1992 Mr. Wayne Cilimberg Director of Planning and Community Development County Office Building Charlottesville, Virginia Dear Wayne: The Service Authority has entered into an agreement with the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Authority to extend public sewer to the airport. Engineering work has not yet been done but the route of the sewer line will be approximately as shown on the attached map. I request that this project be submitted to the Planning Commission for a determination of compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Please let me know what additional information may be required. If you need to wait until the engineering draw- ings are available I don't anticipate having plans in hand for about six weeks. ve~ours, .' J.W. Brent Executive Director c.c: Paul Shoop RECEIVED I {\ M t 5 1992 ~ L" ....%1(.: DEPT ,,~ :...,"1.~tL:.,.,~.~ .3..'" " ~ . .:::::.\ 31 ALBEMARLE COI'~TY I ATTACHMENT / , SERVICE AUTHORITY JURISDICTIONAL AREAS MAP KE m WATER ONLY II \ \ "" \ 10 '0' 'Oc '00 '0' '0' .0. .~ --- SCALC IN fEET IOl;I ..00 HOO , . RIVANNA AND CHARLOTTESVILLE; DJSTRICT~ SECTION 32 DATE I ~ hW1 /'1 I /'7"/.;z 9J. OJ Is, // Y AGENDA ITEM NO. AGENDA ITEM NAME y /;;Je /) -Ie. ,1 !)ow ~'L/ DEFERRED UNTIL (tafek 11 o!;) )/ca ~ Form. 3 7/25/86 . -' ")) . '-I \-~) - +() ?Xl.-\ c~ 2. / (c) j 9 z.. .." ,p. /!; rr I/S--' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road C harIottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296.5823 February 19, 1992 Crenshaw's Auto Service, Inc 1215 Seminole Trail Charlottesville, VA 22901 RE: SP-9l-69 Crenshaw's Auto Service Tax Map 6lW, Section 2, Block A, Parcell Dear Mr. Crenshaw: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on February 18, 1992, unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted request to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the Architectural Review Board; 2. Storage areas shall be limited to those shown on a plat titled "Physical Survey of Lot I, Block A, Section Two, Westfield" and initial~2/5/92lYDF~nd the total number of vehicles available for sale or rental shall not exceed sixty-four (64) at anyone time. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on February 19. 1992. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Ul:/ _/ / ..(' / .,;::--- l cd~~~~---- William D. Fritz Senior Planner WDF/jcw cc: Lettie E. Neher James E. Crenshaw Amelia Patterson Jo Higgins Charlottesville Realty Company ~a:R]jJJ0 i ; . STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: WILLIAM D. FRITZ FEBRUARY 18, 1992 FEBRUARY 19, 1992 SP-91-69 CRENSHAW'S AUTO SERVICE (APPLICANT), CHARIaO'rrESVILLE REALTY COMPANY (OWNER) Petition: The applicant petitions the Board of Supervisors to permit motor vehicle sales and rental on 2.26 acres zoned C-1, Commercial and EC, Entrance Corridor [22.2.2(8) and 30.6.3.2(b)]. Property, described as Tax Map 61W, Section 2, Block A, Parcell, is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Route 29 and Greenbrier Drive in the Charlottesville Magisterial District. This site is located in Neighborhood 2. Character of the Area: The site is currently developed with a service station. Brown's Auto is adjacent to the south. A Texaco Service Station and Daly's Rentals (Ryder Trucks) are located to the north. The property adjacent to the east is vacant. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant proposes to rent and sell vehicles from this site. Sixteen (16) vehicles will be displayed adjacent to the Brown's site. An additional storage area of 15,750 square feet [with a potential of storing 48 cars] has been designated in the rear of the site (Attachment C). The existing service station use (gas and repair) will remain. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval of SP-91-69 subject to conditions. Planning and Zoning History: October 13, 1969 - The Planning Commission approved a site plan for an addition. Comprehensive Plan: The site is located in Neighborhood 2. The Land Use Plan recommendation for this area is Community Service uses. Table 46 (page 61) of the Plan indicates that compatible Regional Service uses are appropriate in Community Service area. Auto dealership is listed as a typical regional service use. Given the existing development/uses adjacent to the site, auto sales/rentals is considered an acceptable use. 1 STAFF COMMENT: This use is by special use permit due to its location: 1) within the entrance corridor, and 2) within the C-l district. In past reports, staff has conunented that "motor vehicle rental" as a use has caused concern due to overcrowding of sites which has resulted in traffic congest~on as well as visual clutter. From observation of existing auto uses along Route 29 North, staff has found the following: a. Sites tend to be overcrowded with vehicles parked in entrances, required landscaped areas and the like; b. Portable signs, balloons, spinners, tent sales and other "attention getters" are often employed; c. Comparatively bright security lighting is employed (Two dealerships were contacted to adjust bright lighting away from Route 29 North). The ARB is addressing the visual aspects of the proposed use. The staff for the ARB has prepared a report which reconunends approval by the ARB subject to conditions (Attachment D). Planning staff will limit its conunents to the ability of the site to acconunodate the use as well as the relationship with adjacent uses. The Department of Transportation has provided conunents regarding the proposed use (Attachment E). Currently, plans are being developed for improvements to Route 29. These plans have not been completed and no construction schedule has been set. The Department of Transportation is reconunending the closure of the northern entrance on Route 29 and the entrance onto Greenbrier Drive. Staff has discussed with the applicant the possibility of relocation of the Greenbrier Drive entrance to a point further from Route 29. This is not practical due to th\~ following: grade difference between site and Greenbrier Drive, a gas pipeline and the separation of this site from Greenbrier Drive by a parcel not under the control of the applicant. The proposed use will increase traffic above current volumes due to the introduction of an additional use. However, this use does not generate more traffic than typical by right retail use. Staff does not support the Department of Transportation reconunendations at this time. with the continued use of the gas pumps, on-site circulation would be extremely poor if the entrances were closed. The closure of the northern Route 29 entrance may negatively affect on-site circulation. Therefore, based on the limited increase in 2 traffic generated by this use and the degradation of on-site circulation which would be caused by entrance closure, staff does not recommend the closure of any entrances at this time. It will be VDOT's decision whether or not to close either or both entrances as part of the Route 29 improvements. Staff opinion is that this use is consistent with the adjacent uses - car sales, equipmen~/truck rental, and gas station. This site is separated from the City limits by one parcel. The zoning of the land within the City limits near the site is M-1, Manufacturing. Staff opinion is that this use is in keeping with the existing development in the area. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Aesthetic issues are being addressed by the Architectural Review Board. ARB staff is recommending approval of the use with conditions. Planning staff has identified the following factors which are favorable to this request: 1. The use is compatible with adjacent uses. 2. The use is consistept with the Comprehensive Plan due to adjacent uses. 3. The proposed use is not a high traffic generator. Planning staff has identified the following factor which is unfavorable to this request: 1. The existing entrances to this site are in close proximity to the Route 29/Greenbrier Drive intersection. The Greenbrier Drive entrance has a very steep grade. Staff opinion is that the limited additional traffic generated by this use does not aggravate the existing entrance conditions. The additional favorable factors offset this negative factor and therefore staff is able to recommend approval of SP-91-69 subject to the following conditions: RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the Architectural Review Board; 3 2. Storage areas shall be limited to those shown on a plat titled "Physical Survey of Lot 1, Block A, Section Two, Westfield" and initialed 2/5/92 WDF and the total number of vehicles available for sale or rental shall not exceed 64 at anyone time. A'rl'ACHMENTS: A - Location Map B - Tax Map C - Physical Survey of Property D - Architectural Review Board Staff Report E - Virginia Department of Transportation Comment 4 ~ :130,.ITO ~ f"R1. 661 I c o IATTACHMENT AI GIBSON MOUNTAIN \ '\ J \. ~ ~ c:...z.... ~ '- ~ } '" ~ . SP-91-69 Crenshaw's Auto Service~ Inc. \. <;l el/ /" .' ,,~,) ALBEMARLE COU"'TY IATTACHMENT 81 .., . I. a SA 4 lIJ-' ~ 10 ,~ '11 .. SP-.91-69 Crenshaw's Auto Service~ Inc. - ==--- - L1..ite Lilli "'"ON '1 ~ I! I 1 .. a .. .1 i IIA l ~ I I "" .. a III .... __ . raY - - - - . CHARLOTTESVILLE DISTRICT SECTION 6'.W -. u.s. THIS IS TO CEfnlFY THAT ON NOVEMBEr? 30,/976,. I SURVEYED THE pnOPERTY SHOWN ON THIS F'LAT AND THE TITLE LINES AND WALLS OF THE BUILDING ARE SHOWN HEREON. ,-, I' ...../ ,,(.>~ d L /' A . k.e.<-L~~:~."'__ ~ c:r- . WILl.IAW,. Il0UDAIU.H, JIl. C[KTI"[O LAND 'U"V[YOIl Clllr"ICAf( NO. Uh,TI~ 29- N.B.L. ROUTE 16 MARKED PARKING SPACES .:1=88032'/8" Rz26.6~' T'2'.9S' L' <fl. /8' [ATTACHMENT cj ... NJ5020'59"E 149,02' ~ ~ ---- (. - ~.J' /. .1cl30 ~N1NNV1d Z66~ E ~ "'If ....J3^'~3~ . . '" . .; .., SU'VICE STATION 60.Z' , , ,. ~, \ ,0 ") /.IE PAIR, ll.l ..6 ,I" -SHJp# ~ V 1" " ~' ~~o/ ~ \' ~l .) , (I y- I ' . '(' , l./'h'./" L\ / /,.,1' ..,/ rt /~ .. ..., I' . !t.t / 1"~'J"wulc ~/,::"~j'/// i 54 \ PARKING AREA ., l, ." )../ . \, \. \. '{ I /1';:>'" ,"-',., I')' / ~v _....~ / / /(1 / i/ / , t:J"f" / (/-/ /// / / u~ ," ~ / / _-%:c;2c >-~ < ~C~ ~.:o:_' , /- ..J.._~rvJ~_<;,.__S~!/~_::?._..::;:_~~::c:....l1 1".. ,:,'.h~~~. .j' ~'" \.<.1/1 ..!'.~_._~.l!....:~'!/:?;7- ~ I P. /, 1 / A /,.;,J /") ~)~~ ;~~ ~~,'3~~~~~~;j~~.:~:-~~~~/::'~:,~~,lk' ~,;3:~=- ~ :~~:~~~ :: :.;-! of _,;{, t___~;::_:.?~.:::."':::?_ ( :-<, ..6 c .I (;~.c 5 c?- ~) -.3- ._~-!:!'.~:~:::'!..,E:.~!:..:_(;:,.:7;f.::l/~.E~-3.': eX/oSh,,; (shl1ltV'l . dn ..:,....Q!h line ~ ;/)-Jnl-,) '>. ,~ "( " C'f ~ , I:~ 'q- 't' ..... -ID ~ C> ....1 0 It) ID 10 II) "., C\j 'q- ..... ID (\j C> I,() ~ It) Ii) <: I I i , I I I I I A r~?L PHYSICAL SURVEY OF LOT I, BLOCK A, SECTION TWO "WESTFIELD" 'CHA RLOTTESVI LLE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~'/1df~~~ I Ie I I I I Ilron 'nd. / /' ,// ./'0.....-- .- ../ 175,00' S .3 6 0 20' 5 9 " W Iron $" /to . ) .()O ,)... ")j - /' C t.,Joy ,. , f '; ':ALE: ~ _: 50 vcr...,'/ nc,J<=s /..Jdcd " /!!; "'/"</7. /1'8 ']..~);;1.___ ;:~... T7..o:.JC' /~!- .-1 clC'J r.J'/C'.-'S,' /e 0<:,.:, -?/..... .I3.1J/. l/p_r~1./~ J: 10 ;:u.:-. ~fI , (t,,), .:'/J.,,.{i, I ' DATE: NOVEMBER 30,1976 WILLIAM S. ROUDABUSH, INC. A Professional CorporatIon CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYORS Charlothsvlll. Virginia l j iOv", l-<;'vlC ...."nl .t ~uPl-'h (0 JOO :::01 I 1 r ." r.. r ,,^ .1 q 74 I ATTACHMENT 0 I STAFF PERSON: Marcia Joseph PUBLIC HEARING: February 3, 1992 ARB-P(SDP)-92-01 CRENSHAW AUTO SALES AND RENTAL DESCRIPTION: Tax Map 61W, section 2, Parcell, Charlottesville Magisterial District, Zoned C-1 commercial, 2.26 acres. LOCATION: Located on the east side of Route 29 (north bound lane) at the intersection of Route 29 and Greenbrier Drive. PROPOSAL: To store and display vehicles outdoors, visible from the Entrance Corridor. sixteen (16) vehicles will be displayed along the northwestern corner of the property, adj acent to the Brown property. An additional 15,750 square foot area [with the potential of storing forty-eight (48) cars] has been designated in the rear of the building. Both areas will be visible from Route 29. The applicant has indicated that the existing pine and cedar trees will remain. He has also indicated that sixteen (16) blue spruce trees will be planted 9 feet - 8 inches o. c. along the north western boundary. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) proposed road plans to improve Route 29 at this location include two (2) additional lanes for east and west turning vehicles onto Greenbrier Drive. In so doing, some of the planting areas adjacent to Route 29 will be diminished. The site is surrounded by uses similar in nature. Brown automotive sales is adjacent to the south and Daily Rentals (Ryder Trucks) is located to the north. The applicant has proposed vegetation to soften the sixteen (16) space display area closest to Route 29. The area delineated in the rear of the building for parking should also be softened. Staff suggest supplemental plantings placed in locations to help delineate the perimeter of the "allocated parking area"; this can be accomplished using groups of trees. Staff suggests that this use is appropriate for this area, and the visual clutter associated with its use can be mitigated with appro~riate use of plant materials. Therefore, staff suggest the Architectural Review Board support SP-91-59, and request the Planning Commission require the applicant to receive a certificate of Appropriateness as a condition of final approval. I ATTACHMENT 0 II Page 2/ January 27, 1992 ARB-P(SDP)-92-01 Page 2 The submittal for a certificate of Appropriateness should contain the following: 1. Location of existing vegetation on site. 2 . Addition of vegetation surrounding the "Allocated Parking Area. .. This should define the area without fencing the cars and inhibiting vehicular movement. .....,... IATTACHMENT EI \-' il f).O.T L.crnrfl€..I1M FrcJm 3~<<= ~ hC'/s Page 2 January 16, 1992 Ronald S. Keeler Special Use Permits & Rezonings 3. ZMA-91-13 United Land Corporation (Briarwood), Route 1575 - The Department addressed comments in the Site Plan Review Meeting letter dated December 24, 1991 and these still apply. The original Board of Supervisor's approval letter dated January 29, 1980 was for a maximum of 661 dwellings. This proposal is for 742 lots/units and this total does not include what is shown as future development on the west side of Route 606. Therefore, the total number of lots shown by this proposal is a major increase from the maximum previously approved. The property on the west side of Route 606 is not shown in the Comprehensive Plan as part of the growth area and the Department does not support inclusion of this area in this request. Route 606 is currently non-tolerable. Should development along Route 606 be approved, the Department recommends that the road be upgraded to current standards. This would include widening, installing proper drainage facilities and hardsurfacing. A traffic study is needed to determine whether there will be an impact on the existing roads in the State system and for sizing of any new State maintained roads. The Department does not support this request should the additional lots cause the existing State roads to become inadequate (improper width and pavement design). Without a traffic study it is hard to determine what impact this request has and what facilities are needed for this proposal. The Department recommends curb and gutter and appropriate storm sewer system on the new proposed State maintained roads due to the lot frontage and scope of development. Under the current criteria for sidewalks, most, if not all of the streets will not be eligible for the sidewalks to be State maintained. 4. SP-91-69 Crenshaw's Auto Services, Inc., Route 29 N. - This special use permit is to allow for the addition of a car rental business on the existing developed property. This request, therefore, would result in an increase in traffic due to the additional enterprise occurring on the property. The Department is developing plans for improvemen ts to ROll te 29 in this vicini ty. These plans are no t compl'~ te at this stage. The Department is proposing closing the northern entrance on Route 29 due to its closeness to the intersection with ROllte 866 and because there will be an exclusive right turn lane on Route 29 for Route 866. The existing entrance on Route 866 is very steep and it is apparent that vehicles have "dragged" the pavement using this entrance. Also this entrance is fairly close to the intersection of " .~./ IATTACHMENT EI~~e 2 Page 3 January 16, 1992 Ronald S. Keeler Special Use Permits & Rezonings Route 29 and the existing shrubbery restricts the sight distance to the west. Therefore, the Department recommends that both the northern entrance on Route 29 and the entrance on Route 866 be closed in conjunction with this request. At this stage it does not appear that additional right of way will be needed on this property for the Route 29 improvements, but it has not been determined whether any easements (possibly utility) will be needed and should that be necessary the Department recommends they be dedicated or reserved. As part of the overall improvements to Route 29 an interchange at the intersection of Routes 29 and 866 was approved. There are no dates set for when this construction would occur and it is very likely that this entire site would be taken for the construction of the interchange. 5. SP-91-71 Unity Church in Charlottesville, Route 743 - Under the existing RA zoning the 5 acres could generate up to 20 VPD. There are no traffic generation figures for a church based on the number of seats, but this request would result in a significant increase in traffic from the current zoning. Route 743 is currently non-tolerable. This property is outside of the designated growth area. The Department is developing plans for the improvement of this section of Route 743. The proposed right of way is approximately 50 feet or so from the existing centerline of Route 743. The Department recommends that the necessary right of way and easements be dedicated or at least reserved. Once the plans are finalized the Department can then determine exactly what would be needed. As a minimum, a commercial entrance with adequate sight distance would be needed to serve this site. Sincerely, ~Q,~ J. A. Echols Assistant Resident Engineer JAElldw -' OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF ZONING VIOLATION From: No. V-92-13 / AMP DATE: February 11, 1992 Amelia M. Patterson (Zoning Administrator) To: Charlottesville Realty Corp./ James Crenshaw (Owner and Violator) You are hereby informed that after investigation the Zoning Administrator has determined that the following use or activity constitutes a violation of the Zoning Ordinance of Albemarle County: Property: 61W 02-A1 (Tax Map No.) (Page No.) (Parcel No.) Owner: Charlottesville Realty Corporation violator: James Crenshaw Nature of Violation: Operation of motor vehicle rental and/or sales, without approval of a Special Use Permit, violation of Section 22.2.2(8). You are hereby ordered to cease and desist from the above violation no later than IMMEDIATELY If you need additional time for termination of this violation you may come to the office of the Zoning Administrator at 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia and extension to a later date will be considered. Under Virginia Code Section 15.1.496.1, if you disagree with this determination of violation you may appeal this decision within thirty days of the date of this letter by filing with this office a written notice of appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals. If you do not file such written appeal within thirty days, this decision will become final and unappealable. ~jJu. "M ,-P~~ Zoning Admin1strator Albemarle County, Virginia CERTIFIED MAIL: P 310 282 432 AMP/sp cc: Ron Keeler' ''0 1'l"f,1'lO~U\J1'l rtO~ ~lt01'l~ u~rt"f,.~ It"f,~ ~ ~\-'0t\M'\{'-:~ C O\\"~ \ '{ 0 ~ ' \'" .,.,-::" r ".::\ . ) \ .,..-4 (''(\ ,\ f' "I" \'\ \ ~.-J' ..' \ '1,'_cM~k"t,,'.,r ~,\ ~ ~ ',",d' "....,l~_, '\ ::.. \ \ \. ^, \ee2\' )'\ \\~. . " . .....' \ \\' ,",' . y .......~...".:i. \ \) ,u~.'\ \\r"'1V . .. '. ,:, '\'~ .\..-'" \~,;;:..\.<_ n' I \ sOP'.. .."': c,Y(cJ'~ '" ,_.," .u\' _'IV :~():j;.",.I.J B~~p..~\.-~ O. ,'t\'0 01' 1''-: ." "",,'09,,,eol C ,v &. Co~~\\\\\ ".9' 01 VI'''O~~\ W,,,I'" I'O;~qO\."S96 .\\ \,]\\<;1,\\\\3 C\l3\\O\\eS\!~~A) ~96-SS~3 . ~ot:~ S\1Yet:"11. t" ~",d ot . " ue"e1.ot>tlle"t 1. co""., _~"",-t, ~1.~etlla~ e ._00 'et ot Co~ . !V"cn1. 'Be"(\1.~~' I Ua,,;.d 1\. tO~ 1. 4, 1.99 '2 ~o"etlle" ,<:S 'I. ea~ l1e~"",a1O'i . ot ROad 1-tII'\...",;.o1\ S ,-" . 't" ~,-$t ~~a1\st>o~ 1>t:1.0t:1. 'l t. of '). co\1"(\t.i. ueyat:t.t\\e"(\ 'Jit:Qi"(\1.a ltOad 1>1.a"(\ seco"(\dat:i !\t.$ to" t.1 ad it\\~t:o~e~esecondat:~ 'st ot ~o ." 'iea~ . 01\ . t~e t>~;.o~~ti 1.~st>o~tat~01\ 5'-~1~c Deat.1\g ~ttac:~,:d ,-$ a"",tlle1\t ~t 't~ad. d."~~,,g tDe ",U ~;.~q,-",-a u~ ~e co"$,-d.e~e Road. ?1.a"1.9 1.99'2' t~e a","'ac~ed, ",le l1e~"",a1O'i' . co"ce~~"q ~e~t.1.o"(\~ 1. t 'fo" ~a"e a~o co"tact tile. "(\ot. ne~1.t.at.e U'B'B/1c~ ~rrrr~c\\l'\"f,~rt Distributed to Board: a -;4- q J Agenda Item No. t/}t I~/I. //7 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mclntiw Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5823 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE f'~1 \? nn nr;:'''2 ff'.::1 I :; -' .'. '.-~. ..-' "....,,'" ~.., 'I \ '\ I ' ~ . . j;: . , 1,"\J \ 1 :.' 1 !<. \<;'~(?f.'~11 I',,\l..""- ~II i:'.1 ';:'i j., --: ': "-',;'<~:<-:t7'''''''''';' , ' l' .... , ..._. ,\ iil. U : ~ ',-,""; ;'~,--" 'W il.U ' '8".... .'T' ";r S'i>lr."-R1iICQDC: . i Uf".I~~ I.) 'Or' vh:.v ;,)., 0""" MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors David B. Benish~hief of Community Development DATE. : February 14, 1992 RE: County Priority List of Road Improvements for Virginia Department of Transportation six Year Secondary Road Plan Attached is the priority list of road improvements for the Virginia Department of Transportation six Year Secondary Road Plan to be considered during the public hearing on February 19, 1992. If you have any questions concerning the attached, please do not hesitate to contact me. DBBjjcw ATTACHMENT STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: DAVID B. BENISH NOVEMBER 19, 1991 SIX YEAR SECONDARY ROAD PLAN - PROJECT PRIORITY LIST Attachment #1 is the staff's recommended priority list of road improvements. There are a total of 62 projects. Fifteen (15) are unpaved road improvement projects. The total estimated cost for all projects is $44,191,814. As discussed in the previous Planning Commission work session, the first 16 projects represent the same order of priority as approved in last year's Six Year Secondary Road Plan. All sixteen have received a significant allocation of funds and in some cases expenditure towards their development. Staff believes all of these projects remain necessary. Below are additional notes concerning specific projects on the priority list. o Priorities 1 (miscellaneous projects) and 3 (plant mix projects) are ongoing, County-wide programs, which are funded annually. o Priority 10, Commonwealth Drive Extension, was previously referred to as the Peyton Drive Construction project. The project will extend Commonwealth Drive to Greenbrier, and will replace Peyton Drive. This project is currently in the right-of-way acquisition phase of development. o Priorities 11 and 13 were previously one project (the widening on Rio Road West, from Route 29 to Hydraulic Road). This project has been split into two projects so the section from Route 29 to Berkmar can be constructed in conjunction with improvements to Route 29. The construction of the intersection of Berkmar Drive Extended at Rio Road could also be timed with this project. o Priority 15, Berkmar Drive Extended: The section between Rio Road and the existing segment behind Rio Hills Shopping Center will be constructed this spring/summer. It is currently in the right-of-way acquisition phase of development. o Priority 16, Tabor Street intersection improvements: The original project proposal was to construct a new segment of Park Road to improve access to Route 240. After public hearings on this project, the Board of Supervisors approved a two phased approach of improving access to the Park Road area. The first phase is to 1 improve the intersections of Tabor Street with Route 240 and Park Road. The second phase is to extend Park Road east and south to Route 250 along the general alignment for the Route 240/250 connector road. The latter project is project 29 on this list. o Priority 18, Georgetown Road (Route 656): This project is considered a high priority due to existing and future high traffic volumes which exceed the capacity of the existing road. The Board has traditionally deferred improvements of this road due to concerns about the potential impact of the project on the existing neighborhoods. Staff is recommending that initially the road be studied to identify necessary improvements and possible alternatives. Emphasis will be placed on intersection improvements rather than major reconstruction of the entire alignment. o Several bridge improvement projects included in the previous six-year plan have been deleted in this year's plan. The sufficiency ratings on these bridges have been re-evaluated and they are no longer considered critical projects. They are: Route 743, at Advance Mills Route 677, near Flordon (RR Bridge) Route 712, at Ammonett Branch Route 637, at Ivy Creek (in Ivy) Route 600, at Mechunk Creek Route 627, at Bolinger Creek Route 667, at Piney Creek Three new proj ects are included in this list: o Priority 30, Route 657 (Lambs Road), improve sight distance on curve just west of Albemarle High School. Priority 31, Route 810 intersection improvement Priority 61, Route 615, paving of a gravel road near the Louisa County Line. Right-of-way has been dedicated for this improvement. 2 o Staff has discussed with Virginia Department of Transportation whether Airport Road (priority 22) could be broken down into two projects with improvements made to the intersection of Airport Road and Route 606 first. It is unlikely that a new intersection improvement could be constructed before the rest of the Airport Road Improvement Project. Exit from the airport is located at this intersection. The ultimate relationship of the Airport's entrance/exit and road network has not been determined. It will be difficult to develop an intersection design until the full Airport Road plans are finalized. This is not anticipated within the next two years. 3 .. Distribti"ted t) 8~~rd: Agenda j~(;ni NJ. . q II 1;2. / / . ;vJ F. R. (Rick) Bowie Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281 Charlotte Y Humphris Jack Jouell Edward H Bam. Jr SamUE'l Miller David P. Bowerman Charlottesville Wailer F Perkins While Hall Peter T. Way Sconsvill.? January 8, 1992 V. Wayne Cilimberg Director of Planning & Community Development Albemarle County Office Building Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Wayne: I was to type up the questions I had about the "Six-Year Secondary Road Plan" which came to the supervisors in the December 4, 1991 memorandum from you. My questions reference the attachments to that memorandum. 1. From the Plannin~ Commission priority list, Attachment 1: No.4 (Rt. 708) lists previous funding at $150,000. This was $158,000 in the 90-91 priority lists. Question: What happened to $8,000? 2. From the Plannin~ Commission Priority List, Attachment 1: No.5 (Rt. 654 - Barracks Road) lists previous funding at $1.000.500. This was $1,128,000 in the 90-91 priority list. Question: What happened to $127,500? 3. What is the process for funds to become UNALLOCATED or to be REALLOCATED? 4. Why are there these differences in the Plannin~ Commission and the VDOT "Estimated Cost" amounts and "Previous Fundin~" amounts? Estimated Cost Previous Fundin~ A. Pl. Comm. Item 4 (Rt. 708) $ 400,000 $ 150,000 VDOT Attachment 3A (No.5) Rt. 708 342,300 65,000 . V. Wayne Cilimberg January '0, 1992 Page 2 B. Pl. Comm. No.5, Barracks Rd. 1,386,772 1,000,500 VOOT No.6, Barracks Rd. 1,386,770 435,500 C. P. Comm. No. 12, Hydraulic 743 2,000,000 185,000 VOOT No. 12, Hydraulic 743 2,500,000 185,000 D. Pl. Comm. Nos. 11 & 13, Rio 29 to Berkmar + Berkmar to 743 4,255,000 245,696 VDOT Nos. 11 & 13 (same as above) 3,750,000 245,696 5. VDOT No.7, Meadowcreek Pky. shows "AOV" date of 1-99. Last update said 7/97. Who made this change? Based upon what information? Is the City Council aware of this change? Does the City Council agree with it? 6. VDOT No.7, Meadowcreek Pky. South (Attachments 3A and 3B, with and without Revenue SharinR. Why could not more Revenue Sharing dollars be put into earlier years of the. 6 year period, especially since this project is one of the top 4 specific projects on our priority list? 7. Pl. Comm. No. 17, Mdck. Pky. North $28,751,000 (Estim. Cost) $ 116 , 000 Prevo Funding) VDOT No. 16, Meadowcreek Pky. North $20,000,000 -0- Why these discrepancies? 8. How does the Board of Supervisors deal with the Rio Road/250 Connector in CATS - $8.2'million in our Secondary System.? 1 .' v. Wayne Cilimberg January 'b. 1992 Page 3 9. VDOT No.7, Attachment 3A, Meadowcreek Pky. - See * at bottom of page which says "Based on coordination with the city." Questions: How does the Board of Supervisors proceed? Does the county make a formal request to the City Council? Is the portion from Preston Ave. to the US 250 Bypass officially eliminated? This was still listed in the Urban 6- year program. 10. VDOT No.7, Attachment 3A, Meadowcreek Pky. Without Revenue Sharing, $3 million of state funds go into Meadowcreek Pky. in 1996-97 and 1997-98. On Attachment 3B, with Revenue Sharing, only $2.12 million of state funds are designated during this same time period. Also, $1 million of Revenue Sharing funds are put in for 1998-99, BUT $880,000 in state funds are taken out. WHY? Thank you for your help, Wayne, in helping to get answers or explanations for me. Sincerely, ~~ Charlotte Y. Humphris pc: Board of Supervisors Robert W. Tucker, Jr. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors \)l:tJ L"'" \? \; ....:- V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community Development DATE: December 4, 1991 RE: Six-Year Secondary Road Plan Attached please find information on the Six-Year Secondary Road Plan. Attachment 1 is the priority list as recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. Attachment 2 is background information provided by the Virginia Department of Transportation Resident Engineer's Office. Attachment 3 is a draft of Virginia Department of Transportation's proposed Six-Year Road Plan based on the Commission's recommended priority list. Two scenarios are provided. Attachment 3A is the Six-Year Plan without Revenue Sharing funds. Attachment 3B is the Six-Year Plan assuming $6 million in Revenue Sharing funds over the six year period ($1 million/year). Virginia Department of Transportation and Planning Staff will be available to discuss this package at the Board's worksession on December 11, 1991. VWC/blb cc: Mr. Bob Brandenburger Mr. Dan Roosevelt STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: DAVID B. BENISH NOVEMBER 19, 1991 SIX YEAR SECONDARY ROAD PLAN - PROJECT PRIORITY LIST Attacr~ent #1 is the staff's recommended priority list of road improvements. There are a total of 62 projects. Fifteen (15) are unpaved road improvement projects. The total estimated cost for all projects is $44,191,814. As discussed in the previous Planning Commission work session, the first 16 projects represent the same order of priority as approved in last year's Six Year Secondary Road Plan. All sixteen have received a significant allocation of funds and in some cases expenditure towards their development. Staff believes all of these projects remain necessary. Below are additional notes concerning specific projects on the priority list. o Priorities 1 (miscellaneous projects) and 3 (plant mix projects) are ongoing, County-wide programs, which are funded annually. o Priority 10, Commonwealth Drive Extension, was previously referred to as the Peyton Drive Construction project. The project will extend Commonwealth Drive to Greenbrier, and will replace Peyton Drive. This project is currently in the right-of-way acquisition phase of development. o Priorities 11 and 13 were previously one project (the widening on Rio Road West, from Route 29 to Hydraulic Road). This project has been split into two projects so the section from Route 29 to Berkmar can be constructed in conjunction with improvements to Route 29. The construction of the intersection of Berkmar Drive Extended at Rio Road could also be timed with this project. o Priority 15, Berkmar Drive Extended: The.section between Rio Road and the existing segment behind Rio Hills Shopping Center will be constructed this spring/summer. It is currently in the right-of-way acquisition phase of development. o Priority 16, Tabor Street intersection improvements: The original project proposal was to construct a new segment of Park Road to improve access to Route 240. After public hearings on this project, the Board of Supervisors approved a two phased approach of improving access to the Park Road area. The first phase is to 1 improve the intersections of Tabor Street with Route 240 and Park Road. The second phase is to extend Park Road east and south to Route 250 along the general alignment for the Route 240/250 connector road. The latter project is project 29 on this list. o Priority 18, Georgetown Road (Route 656): This project is considered a high priority due to existing and future high traffic volumes which exceed the capacity of the existing road. The Board has traditionally deferred improvements of this road due to concerns about the potential impact of the project on the existing neighborhoods. Staff is recommending that initially the road be studied to identify necessary improvements and possible alternatives. Emphasis will be placed on intersection improvements rather than major reconstruction of the entire alignment. o Several bridge improvement projects included in the previous six-year plan have been deleted in this year's plan. The sufficiency ratings on these bridges have been re-evaluated and they are no longer considered critical projects. They are: Route 743, at Advance Mills Route 677, near Flordon (RR Bridge) Route 712, at Ammonett Branch Route 637, at Ivy Creek (in Ivy) Route 600, at Mechunk Creek Route 627, at Bolinger Creek Route 667, at Piney Creek Three new projects are included in this list: o Priority 30, Route 657 (Lambs Road), improve sight distance on curve just west of Albemarle High School. . Priority 31, Route 810 intersection improvement Priority 61, Route 615, paving of a gravel road near the Louisa County Line. Right-of-way has , been dedicated for this improvement. 2 o Staff has discussed with Virginia Department of Transportation whether Airport Road (priority 22) could be broken down into two projects with improvements made to the intersection of Airport Road and Route 606 . first. It is unlikely that a new intersection improvement could be constructed before the rest of the Airport Road Improvement Project. Exit from the airport is located at this intersection. The ultimate relationship of the Airport's entrance/exit and road network has not been determined. It will be difficult to develop an intersection design until the full Airport Road plans are finalized. This is not anticipated within the next two years. 3 A TT ACHMENT 2 I. ~(,~/-;.~;--:.;;;~. ,\::r;-;~qJ( r~.~ . ~ . M'-:""' ,-' I. -if ! '.. \ r t. ~--~ ~~~\'$~ W ~ SEP 20 1991 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA PLANNING DiVISION RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902 September 17, 1991 ~."" ; , .. ..... .._~ l~~ D. S. ROOSEVELT RESIDENT ENGINEER Mr. David Benish Department of Planning 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 1992-98 Six Year Plan Albemarle County Dear Mr. Benish: It is time to revise the six year plan for Albemarle County. Attached is a listing of the estimated funds available for construction for 1992-93 thru 1997-98. The regular construction allocation for the six year period is $15,725,364. Although there are no restrictions on how these regular construction funds are used, it has been VDOT policy to have a balanced plan. We are recommending that a portion of these funds be.used on bridge replacements and to upgrade railroad-highway grade crossings. Attash~~ is a~i~ting of_~ri~es_yith low_ sufficienc~ ratings and railroad ~rossings which are eligible tor upgrading. The allocation of $4,298,740 for unpaved roads is to be used for gravel road improvements as required by the Code of Virginia. The routes in the gravel road list are in order of priority in the current six year plan. The right of way on Route 615 was available in June 1990 and we are recommending that Route 615 be included in the revised plan. All incomplete construction projects in the current plan are shown on the list with updated cost and current funding. There is also a column which shows the cumulative totals of additional funding necessary to complete the projects. Please review the attached lists and contact this office to schedule meeting to discuss the revision of the six year plan. We would like to work toward the Board of Supervisors approval of a revised plan by February 1, 1991. f Yours truly, b{ 1. tf Contract Administrator GGU/yrm attachments I ." '"'l I-" ...... I-" I-" I-" I-" "1 0 I.D I.D I.D I.D I.D I.D 0< 1-4 '"'l I.D I.D I.D I.D I.D \0 tzl Ul :l>' -.J en U1 ~ W N :l>' <1 t'" I I I I I I ::t' :l>' I.D I.D \0 I.D I.D I.D t'" OJ -.J en U1 ~ W * I I-" I 1ft Ul U1 I N N N N N N tzl I , , , , , ::t' <1 -.J I OJ -.J en U1 U1 ~ <1 tzl 0 N I I.D ~ I-" 0 ...... ~ 0 G'l Z U1 I 0 OJ w OJ I.D ~ Z c: t:l I , Ul t'" :l>' w I N -.J 0 U1 -.J \0 '"'l :l>' I-" ::t' en I en en en OJ ~ ~ ::t' \0 0< ~ I 0 en w ~ -.J ~ I.D :l>' I N <1 t'" I 0 tv \0 Z tzl w Ul ~ ::t' :l>' rT '"'l ::t' ::rc: t'" ~ <1 tzl C '"'l 1-4 <1 I I-" 0 0 * I \0 Z c: ~ I I.D Z , I * c: -.J > '"'l N I -.J -.J -.J en en en ::t' Z I t'" 0< ~I I OJ ~ I-" OJ I.D -.J 0 "0 \0 t'" I en OJ N OJ N -- :l>' :l>' OJ 0 I , t:l <: <1 -.J I I-" W I-" ~. I-" U1 Ul tzl :l>' ~ I I-" ~ I-" I.D 0 -.J t:l '"'l 0 I U1 0 N N U1 en 1-4 I 0 Z Ul :::t * I N I * 0 I W W W W W W , I , '"'l 0 I en ~ w I-" N I-" 0 N I -.J I.D N I.D I-" -- '"'l ~ I en -.J U1 -.J I-" en :l>' I , , t'" I-" I W I-" .... 0 OJ U1 0 t -.J 0 -.J -.J U1 N ~ I U1 en U1 en N 0 I . " ~~~~~~~~~WWWWWWWWW~JNNN~~~~~~~~.00~ ID ~ .CO -J U1' ~ N .... 0 \.0 _J U1 .... N N .... .... 0 0:> ::n t...:l '-' '.u U1 .... l'>o W W '-' ,:) W N .... --------"'-"""-..........-..--""------"'-"--.......,-------------'--'-'- a a::o m~m_Jm_Jcom_Jm_Jmmmm_J_Jmoomm_Jmmmmmmm_JOmOO ........w....1.D00....WOWN'.00-J-J............m\.Qw....-Jw-J-JWWU10. N C I.DI.D_JNN....o....~....m........_J_Jwwl.Dm........woo........................OO~U1~~ .... ....tzl o 0 tzl tzl 0000'\l:::C'\l mmm_Jt"'>.... WWU10>~'\l ............coZ~tzl I I I I ~ 0 Ul 0000 Z~ '\l 0000:3: Ul::O NNNN.... '1]"" 0 I I I IX[%1Clt...& ........NN ::OZtzl NN........ ::OUla COCON.... ::o~ ~ o<:tzl ~ a 000000000000000000000000 m~m_JOOm-Jm_Jmmmm-J_Jmoomm-Jmmmm w....l.Dco....WOWNI.DO~_J............~l.Dw...._Jw_J_J -JNN....o....co....m_...._J_JwWl.Dm.........~co............ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 '1 I I I I 000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I ....NN........NN........ U1WWOOU1NNI.DI.D com....U1WW............ , , ~ , , ~ , ~ , , ... ~a~aaaaaaaaa~o~aa U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 tJ, U1 en U1 m U1 U1 o 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 .... 0 .... 0 0 ....~........N....N....mNN........ 00 mm ........ I.DI.D I I 00 00 NN I I .... .... U1 tJ' .... .... ~ , ~ .... ~ .... ~a~~ao~ao(j(j.:1(j m tJ, WO 0"" ~ ::0 .... o Cl t:1 o <: tzl ::0 (j Ul X ::0 > .... t'" ::0 o > o > ~ '\l ::0 o 'I] .... ~ ~ ':l:l I > Z .:1 :::c m Ul w '\l.... o ~I ....Ul :3: '\l '\l0 ::O~ o <:.... :3::3: tzl'\l Z ::0 ~O Ul <: ::0::0::0 ~ ~ 0 tzl C _J~ Otzl Nm o ~ o ::0 ~m tzl _J ~I.D 0U1 ....~~ o 0 ::0 ::0 :3:00 .... C C ~ ~ t OO::O'\l CCt-j'\l ~ ~ 0 ::0 t-lXtzl tzl ::0 0 N><: I.D....[ZI t'" ::0 ~::o ><:oa '\l>Ul >t:lX Ul (,') ::0 > t-j t'" ::0 o > o ....0 U1_J ON .... .... ~ > ::0 '\l ,.... '\l o ::0 Cl tzl ~ o 0 <: tzl ~ ::0 ::0 t-j ::0 0 .... Cl <: [ZI > Z 0 Z <: >tzl ::0 ::0 .... Z <: tzl 'I] ::0 ::0::0....::0::0::0.... o~ZOO~ Ctzl~CCtzlW >-l >-l >-l [%1...... tzltz1 :3: ....H NH NU1:3:_JmU1 1.DU1'\l....U10Ul ::OW_J >-l >-l 0 >-l o 0 <: >-l >-l 0 ::0 o 0 ~ ::o::orc:> ::O:>:l o >-l ::0 ::0 :xl .... c[ZI~....O[%1m .... [ZIC.... t<I_J ....m ....N tzl_J~ W....N 000 ol.Dm I w- .n-....Z.... ::Oltzl :x:H-~:::: t-tQ= H Cl ><:> :::c ::0 0 t'" o ::0 H Ul Ul' > Cl ~-CZ t'" :::: ::0 H [%1 .... (j Z o-im ::0-.... t:l >~Z '\l ::0 0 '\l H t'" ::0 t:l o Cl 0 >t'l::: a :::c t Z Ul ::0 H <: tzl ::0 o <: <: H t:1 t'" ::ot'" [ZI :3: 01-'] o 0 ::0 :::: Ul > 0 z. ::0 ::0 H ::0 <: [%1 ::0:3: tzl > o o ~ (j ::0 tzl [ZI ~ U1 IJl ~ Ul ::OH> HO'l] 0[%1t<! C'l Z .... tz1 ><: o-i o 0 H <: :::: tzl....'\l ::0 ::0 t'" 0 :::: ::- <: [%1 Z t<! ::- t<1 :::: o Ul tzl o Z ~1.-1 a ::0 ::0 > tzl o-i .-1 tzl tzl ~ H ....z ....o-i o m '\l ~ 0<: .... o o U1 ::0 >-ll-'] o tzl ::0 .-1m tzlw ..... >O'U "O'UH 'Ut:!'U ~ ~ ~1 >-:l'" '\lHZ t'" 0 Ul ::-Z>-l Z > >-30t'" 'I] t'" :3: > H :I: >-3 X>HO >-lOt:! >-3 I-'] Z !'.Il OOUlO Z~ ::0 Ul ZH C 'I] [ZI "0 :xl t<l ~ >-l '1]::0 .... >::OUlO a><:HZ tzl Cl Z ~ Ul ::0 ~ tzl Ul > [ZI >-3 t:! t<1 t:l o H Z ::0 Cl o Ul tzl >-3 (j / ::0 H <: ::- Z Z > ::0 H <: t:! ::0 m o m- Z t:1 ~ > t'" H Cl Z :3: tzl Z >-l m U1 m o t'" t<I Z o N o 0000000.... WmU1......l.DmN....1 OwOO.......JO\.Q o N. ON .... ...... ...... ...... ...... .... N U1U1N............WNU1_JU1....U1U1....0mNW......Nomm 00....CO0U1U1I.DNU10NOOOOOO-JNU10U1.... 00U10000U1U100U10000001.D0U100N ~ ... ... .... .... , ... ... ... ... ... , ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ , , , oooooooooooooooooowOOOO....O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONoooomo 000000000000000000U10000eno U1I.DWCOW....N ma>-3 ....NU10cooomooo m......oomOOOOUl~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1"""i:Z:- U100-J0000 t'" wOO-JOOOO -JOONOOOO N .... N........_JU1U1_J I.Dco....co....w....mo ....U1U1U1........U1N0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... womOONmU10 ....OI.DOOw....mO 0000mOO....WU10 00000000000000000 ..... 0.... 0U1 00 ~ ~ U10 00 000000 'U '1]::0 C[ZI Z< OH H 0 ZC ClUl > ........... .......................... N .... ...... 0 ~ 'I] 0 U1U1N................WNU1_JU1_U1U1....0mN_ OOONOO wmOOWNN mCH 00......000U1U1I.DNU10NOOOOOOOOWO.....0...J U1U1000U10mOZ>-l 00U10000U1U100U1000000-JU1I.DU1m...J oooomOOOOOH ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... .... ....... ............. .... ... ... .... ... ... ... ..... 0 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOI.DOWOOI.DWI.DOONOOOOZZ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-JOOOOWU1-JOO-JOOOOCl> ooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...JO....OON...JNOONOOOO t'" NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN...................................... I.Dcoco_J_J_J_JmmmU1....wN.........OI.DOO-J...JW..........OOCO-JWNN...... .... .... .... .... .... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... .... ... ... ... ... _m~I.D-JW......COU10N-Jm....mNNm....NNNW......WWI.DN.........oomm NNN....WWooWW......mmwwwwwwW..........ooooooO....I.DI.D....mmo mmm...........................m.................mmmmmmmcoW....I.DWU1U1mmmoooo ... .... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... .... , ... ... ... ... .... .... ... ... .... .... ... ... ... .... rnrnrnrnrnrnoooocoOOCOOOCOCOCOCOOOCOCOCOOOU1U1U1~N~~~QQQQ >-lO'l]> OCCO >-l:3:Z0 > CO"" t"'t"'Ho-i Ul>ZH >-lClQ Ul [ZI o o Z ::0......0 [ZII.D> ClI.D::O CN><: t"'1 >l.Da ::oWe Z a >-:l Ul o :::c ::0 Z::O>-l Ul C C ::0 0 >-l......>-l CI.D.... (j1.D0 >-l...JZ ....11 OiD'U ZOO::O o Cl ::0 > :3: / >- H t"' ;1>0 Ol t"' t%] ~ t%] Cl c: t'"' ;1>0 ~ ('l o z (J) ~ ;.1 ,-. (i >-j H o Z "<1 C Z " IJl "<1 o ~ ~ \D \D N I \D W >-j ::I: ~ C ~ \D \D -J I \D (X) <rr ~ (]1 - -J N (]1 , W en ~ .-j (%1 t'J N - .- 0 0 "'--'---- ~ t%] <: t%] z c: t%] (J) ::I: ;1>0 ~ H Z Cl Z ::I: H ('l ::I: ~ en en en en en en 0 enenNNOOC -J-J-J-JOO~ t%] 000 en en en cnenN -J-J-J I I I 000 000 NNN I I I 000 en en en NOO -JOO I I I 000":1 OOO~ NNNO I I 1 -:... t%] ('l >-j - , Ol ('l Ol ('l Ol ('l H (J) ;1>0 Z >-j H ('l H '"0 ;1>0 ~ t%] " ~ o Ol t%] <rr en o o o , o o o Ol;l>oI:J:l>I:J:l> ~'"O~'"O~'"O H'"OH'"OH'"O ,,~,,~,,~ Cl Cl Cl t%] t%] t%] ~ ~ ~ 000000 <: <: <: t%]0lt::l0lt::l0l ~~~~~~ H H H '"0 " Ol " 3: " HCl>Clt%]Cl Zt%]t'"'t%]('lt%]" t::l t'"' ::I: t::l ><:OHOC:OIJl <:Z<:Z<:('l ('l t%] Cl t::l ;:.;: t%] ~ ::O~t::l~ ~H t::l ~ ('l 'oj t%] '"0 Ol::O 3: >-j ;:';:H('l;l>ot%]t%]1-I Z::tlt'"'t::l('lO t%]t%]t'"';:';:::I:Z ><:t::lH C ;:.;:Z Z ('l Cl ;:.;: ~ t::l t::l ~ ('l t%] ::0 ;:.;: ('l t%] ;:.;: t%] ;:.;: H (J) Z o >-j H Z ('l t'"' C " t::l " H Z >-j o >-j :::- t'"' Vl t'"' t%] I Z N.....~..-~~('l~ O-J(X)-J~~OO 0(]10(]100(J)~ .... .... ... .. ..... .. I-i > 000000 t'"' 000000 000000 000000 :::- " "'l " N"-"-"-"-~CH O-J(X)-J~"-Z>-j 0(]10(]100"H '... ... ... .. .... ... 1-4 0 OOOOOOZZ OOOOOOQ:::- 000000 t'"' WWWNNN OOO\D\D\D>-j('l ... ... ... .. .. ... 0 C ~NO(X)en(]1>-j:3: OOW(]1-JW:::-C enen..-..-enent'"'t"' ... ... .. .. ... ... U1):11 (X) (X) (X) (X) CD CD >-j ~ ..- ~ ..- ..-..- H '"0 "<1::0 Ct%] Z <: " H H 0 Z C Q (J) Ul t%] ('l o Z ::o~" t%]\D>> Q\D::Ot'"' CN><:1:J:l t"' I t%] >\D('l:3: ::OWe> Z::o ('l ~ Ul t"' O::I:::Ot%] Z::tlt-l (J) C c: ('l ::0 ('l 0 ~~~c: C\DI-IZ C1\DO~ ~-JZ><: 1-11 o \D '"Oit z(X)::tl o Q ~ > 3: "'l > C'" Z " " H I-I~ ZI-I Q 0 Z LJ --.........--------.........-- ::0 * > *WWW<..vWW'_vWWWWWWW 0 <: O"lO"lU'lO"lO"lO\O"lO\O\O"lO"lO"lO"lO"l c::: ::0 > ""--'.......""--'.........................."""'-'........"""'-'--........................ ..., 1-1 H [%l 9 t"' Ul ~ > ::0 01 0'\ 0'\ -J -J 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ -J 0'1 -J 0'\ -J -J 0'\ 0'1 0 > t"' ..... 0 .... W 0'\ 0 -J 0 CX) U'I W 0'\ ..... ..... CX) c::: ::0 0 [%l U'I O"l ..... -J -J U'I 1.0 co CX) 1.0 -J 0 N 0 N ..., [%l "<l t:1 Gl t"' ~ ::0 H > > Ul ..:: < 0.0 00 0 00 0000 00 0 0 .; [%l 0'\0'1 -J-J 0'\ 0'10'\ -JO'\-JO'\ -J-J 0'\ 0'\ t:1 > t"' .....0 .....w 0'\ O-J OCX) U'I W 0'\.... ..... CX) t:3 < U'IO'\ .....-J -J U'II.O CX)CX) 1.0 -J ON 0 N > :ti I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H H 0 00 00 000 000 000 0 0 'tl Z t"' > 00 00 000 000 000 0 0 ::0 > t:3 NN NN NNN NNN NNN N N 0 0 01 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I c... ::0 t"' > N 'tl [%l t:3 [%l t"' 0 W () [%l t"' N w ..., ::0 c... 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ " " " ~ " c::: n zzzzzzzz ZZZ ZZZ Z 0 Z > U'I U'I "<l t:1 ..., 0 0 H ..... ..... 'tl ..... 0 ::0 1.0 Z H 1.0 0 0 "<l ::0 ::0 ::0 .... Gl ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 0 ..., N ..., ...,. ::0 N -J 0 .... ..., .... 0 0 ..., H ::0 [%l t:1 [%1 O"l [%1 c::: [%1 t%] [%l C C [%l ..., 3: t%] 3: - ..., ..., .... "'" ..:: .... z 3: Z Ul ~ [%1 [%l tzl 1.0 0'\ N en Z [%1 0'\ 0'\ N N H 1.0 W ::0 1.0 ::0 ::0 0'\ .... W 1.0 N N U'I Z N 1.0 .... ""::0 () ..., .... W 0'\ U'I 1.0 0 0 I ...,0.... . U'I ..., () W ..., CX) 0 t"' -J -J ..., .... 0 .... .... .... t:3 C 0 U'I 0'\ W lO ..., 0 0 0 0.0 t:l ::0 .... 0 ::0 W 0'\ CX) U'I 0 ::0 Ul ::0 = t"' ..., U'I .... "<l ::0 ..., ::0 t:3 ..... () [%l ::0 0 .... t%] 3: 0 ..., ..., t:3 t"' ..., [%1 ..., tzl. ::0 Z C C 0 ~ .... o 0 tzl C tzl tzl :::- -J H ..., H O. > < t:3 'tl ..... Ul ..... -J ::0 CX) t:3 > -J 3: ..., Ul 1.0 >. ..... ..., ::0 I.Q W Z 0'\ ..... 0'\ tzl Ul H H 1.0 -J N' ..., 3: tzl Z CX) N 1.0 Z 0 X -J () t:l 3: 3: Z ::- N N t:3 ::0 Z Ul I 0 3: -J Ul t:l t:3 ..., tzl ..:: 1.0 Z N -J Gl (1 (1 tzl CX) 0'\ -J ::0 ::0 ::0 0 > t"' ::0 0'\. ..., ..., t"' -J ..... Z ::0 H ..., CX) 1.0 t:3 Z () -J 0'\ -.J - 1.0 > > 'tl {/} tzl CO . W N GlN ::0 t"' t"' .l:>- U1 t"' CX) 0 ::0 I ..:: 01 > 0 >1.0 tzl Z N <(.oJ () 3: 1.0 tzl 0 > CX) 0 ..... 0..... .....00 N 0 0 N ..... 0 N N t"' t"' ..., Z ::0 [%1 :I: Ul t"' -.J U'I-.J U'INNCX)-J ..... -.J 0'\ N U'I CX) wU'I Z ::0 ::0 ..., tzl .l:>- 00 U'I0U'lWU'I 0 N 0 0 W -J 00 0 C ::0 0 I > C (") t:3 ..... () 0 Ul 1.0 ..., C .... 1.0 H Z (1 ..., -.J 0 o-:l NCX)W-J.l:>-w.I:>.-.JWNIOU'lW ION 0 0 I Z ..:: NOU'lOU'lONNO.....ONU'I .l:>-U'1 Ul .... 1.0 OOOOOOU'lU'lOOOU'lO 00 o-i > CX) 'tl " " " " " " " " " " " " " " t"' ::0 :~ 0000000000 0 0000 0 000000000000000 Gl 000000000000000 ::0 > :3: 'tl "<l ::0 C tzl -J Z < W t:3 H H 0 CX) Z C N c;) Ul 0000000000000 00 > ..... t:3 >zj t:3 NCX)w-J.I:>.w.I:>.-.JWNI.OU'lWI.O..... CH NOU'lOU'lONNO.....ONU'I.l:>--.J Zo-:l OOOOOOU'lU'lOOOU'lOOO'\ t:3H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ 0 00000000000000..... ZZ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOCX) C;)> 000000000000000 t"' .......................................................................... CX) CX) CX) CO CX) CX) CX) CX) CX) CX) CX) CX) CX) CX)' CX) 000000000000000 (") o-l C o 3: o-iC >t"' t"'> Ulo-i H S 5 CX)CX)-J-.JO'\U'lU'lU'I.l:>-.I:>.WNNN..... ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ , ~ , , , W..... WOwCX)U'I......I:>......CX) 1.O.l:>-......... -J U'I U'I 0 0 U'I U'I N 0 0.1.0 1.0 0'\ .... -J ..................................0'\................0'\0'\0'\ ,....~~..~~~,..~~.. * * it * I-l Z :l:l Z 0 0 t-< >-3 -J en en en en en c (") t'l ~ .... -J ~ .... (J1 >-3 C .. W 0 ...... ...... U) ...... t'l t::l t'l (") t::l 0 Ul I-l >-3 Z Ul (") :> c :l:l :l:l t'l en en en en en en Ul :l:l ...... 0 0 0 0 ...... Z >-3 t'l '<1 0 .... U1 .... ~ N 0 :l:l Z 0 .... ...... CD .... U) ~ ..,) ::0 Ul tll I-l :l:l X I-l t::l Z (") :3: (") (") (") tl3 0< C1 Ul 0 Ul Ul Ul :l:l t'l t'l X 0 X X X :l:l I-l :> '<1 :l:l :> t::l :l:l 0 0 :l:l :3: :l:l :l:l ~ t::l 0-3 G1 :> Z :l:l :> :> >- :> >- t'l I-l t'l t-< 'l:l t-< ;:>:; I-t Z I-t I-l I-l Ul Z Ul tl3 t-< 0< t-< Ul t-< t-< t-< (") G1 t'l :> :l:l :l:l :l:l :l:l :l:l :l:l ~ :3: Z I-l 0 :l:l 0 0 0 I-l 0 I-l :> Z <: :> I-l :> :> :> 'l:l ~ ..,) :l:l 0 t::l <: t::l t::l t::l 0-3 :x: t-< t'l I-l N t'l :> :l:l :l:l 0 0 Ul 'l:l I-l Z C (") 'l:l <: 0 '<1 0 :l:l t'l :l:l '<1 C 0 :l:l I-l Z :> t-< (") 0-3 CJ l%l I-l 0< :x: Ul l%l t'l Ul Z Ul :l:l (") :> Ul 0< :> N ...... ...... ....... ...... ..,) C :l:l 0 CD -oJ en ...... en I-l "'1 t'l Z '<1 ~ en N N en 0 G). I-l Z / CJ t-< C t::l :l:l t'l t'l 0 'l:l {j} {j} {j} {j} {j} {j} t-< I-l CD ~ \.0 W (]'I toJ CJ :> z N N N 0 0 ...... 0 (") (]'I (]'I N 0 0 (]'I Ul t'l .,~ ::l ~ ~ ~ ~ 0-3 :3: M 0 0 0 0 0 0 t'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-3 CJ 0 Ul ...., Ul 'l:l (") :l:l C I-l :l:l w ...... .... 0 :l:l ...... ~ U) :l:l t'l I-l Z ..,) 0-3 0< /.. * > tl ..., * l-l II ~ ~ z .... 0 0 C1 > W -.1 Ol C Ol Ol 0\ Ol Ol C t"1 <: .... J:>,. .... ..., CD -J t.:J N 0 ..., C t'l 0 J:>,. .... t'l N u:l -J (}'1 N t'l tl :a t'l > tl Gl t'l l-l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z tl . . . > 0 0 N N N -.1 -J 0 C1 l-l (}'1 N w w (}'1 J:>,. (}'1 .... 0 t"1 C ><: 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Z l-l l-l 1-1' 1-1 1-1 l-l 1-1 1-1 ..., >-:l ><: :a t/l - > t/l t/l Z t/l t/l t/l t/l t/l ""I ~ ""I :a C1 1-1 :a ~ :a ..., ::0 :a :a :a c C1 ..., ..., ..., ~ t'l 0 0 0 0 ~ :a t'l t'l t'l > C C C C > :a .... ~ 1-1 ..., ..., ..., ..., 1-1 t'l u:l t"1 1-1 t"' N t'l t'l t'l t'l t"1 t"' Z u:l Ol N 0'\ 0 ..., :a (}'1 0 ~ :a ..., 0 N \0 C1 ::c 0 0 -J -.1 CD 0'\ C1 .... 0 .... > > W N .... N > ..., > t/l ..., t"' tl > CD 0'\ N Ol ..., ::c tl > l-l l-l l-l I t"' 1-1 0 I t"' X 0 Gl ::c III 0 C ::c III I Z ::c 1-1 t'l H ~ ::c ::c z ..., l-l t'l ><: ..., Gl 3 <: > > 0 Gl 3 t'l t/l ::c > ><: :a ..., ~ t"1 ::c > > ~ :a ~ ..., > l-l ~ :a ~ > > t"' t'l 0 :a Gl > t"' I Z ><: t'l Z Z tl ::c ><: t'l "0 tl t/l ..., t"' Gl C1 <: t/l Gl C1 > ~ :a 0 1-1 ~ 0 Z 1-1 > C t"' 0 > C ..., tl Z t"' ~ tl Z ::c t'l ..., t'l t'l ..., 0 ><: Gl ><: ~ c C1 :I>' C1 ..., ~ ..., :a 0 t'l 0 Gl t/l t/l t/l > CII t/l .... > ...,l-l N W .... > 1-1 W W \0 tl t'l Z .... u:l .... J:>,. tl Z w 0 J:>,. ..., mGl w .... (}'1 -.1 \0 ..., Gl t/l m <Il- <Il- <Il- <Il- <Il- <Il- <Il- .... <Il- .... .... .... .... .... ex> 0 ex> 0 0 0 0 0 (}'1 0 (}'1 0 0 0 0 0 .. .. C1 .. .. .. C1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t/l 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 ..., 0 0 0 0 0 ..., '-f Ul ... Z W ~ W > o IX 0.. ~ CO CO- < a. IX I'- ~8: <~ C Z::) OIX U:t: W... Ul 1"1 IXo- o .... . >-N ~8: IX~ o IX 0.. >- ... z i5 U W ...J IX < ~ W co ...J < II II II 0-11 .....11 t-NII 2_11 w II ~""II CWOII WCl) II .....-U)II <...<11 ::E~ II -WW ...>... UlC< W<C .... "'0 Ul OUl U< CW <~ 0< IXZ W IX ...W i5~ IX::) z IX o ....Ul>- 0-'" >- C IX IX IXWO <0..- O::)IX CO en 0.. z ClO>- z -... -Ul- ZUlIX Z-O <~- ~~8: U ,-, If"l 0'1 - r-- '-" ""'""........""",...."of'''",.... I"INo-NNI"INI"I~~N~LI'l 0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0- 0-0-0- ............................................. ............... LI'l-o ~~I'- LI'l ~ I'- -0 It-.~ LI'l I'- '-"""'""""'""'''-'''.......'''y....,......,'''' .......... 1'-1'-..... 0-0--0 ..........0- Co ..... ~~I'- ............ .......... 8:~ .......... ~I'- ........ . . o g Rgl"I~ gg~ ~gggggg g o OO~O~-O~~OO_O~ ~OOOO~OOOOOO 00 "0 ... .. .. ..0.- (>. .. .. ..0 ....- .. .. .. .. ..00 "000 I ~gg~~~~~~~~gg$~~~ggg~~~~~~~~: o ..ON~~~~O~O~O_O~ ..O~N_~OOOOOOI ~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~re~~~~~~~~~~~ 0: ..... N ~ o o 00000000 00 .00000 00000000 .....0 .......... OLl'lOOLl'lOOO anN ..ONOOC) ""an..... ""....:t--", IX o Ul > ... 0> ..- U Wl.L 'W ICe.::: . . 'WW 0::0:::0::..... ............... t- W -,>.....- ......... ................Z> .1-1-..... UCJ....O.. 'UUUClCJ% UlZOOUlIXZUlUl...enenenZO WUlUlUl WZWWWWLI'lWWWWWWZZW w~8:8:~CO~~~~~~~88: ~~~~ cix~~~~~~~~cicicixxffi 0..... ~U~IXUU""'UUU""'~ IXUUU IX IXIXIXIXOIXIXIXIXIXIX > a: ~ ~ - ~ .8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. 0.. 0.. ~ ~ ~ .. . os: 0 0 .00- Ow ---- ---www 0.. Ul ....IXIXIX.....IXIXIXIXIXIXIXIXIXIX IXIXIXIXClW U ClClClWW~ ZIXZWO 000 000 W ...000 co............w.........ooooo- CJWCC.......,3--,-,:a-,-,-,:a.....330-,-,-,3-COOOOcnooo-__<< - 0.....J Z < W IX < < w< < <w Z W W 0.. < < < W IX IX 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. . 0.. 0.. 0.. IX IX IX IX IX 0 cnoo..-:EzmX:E:Z:E:E::EZ-zzcn::E::E::EzmCJCI)U)U)CI)CI)CI)CI)CI)mmmCJCJCI) Z o - ... 0.. IX U Ul W o :..: IX IX <... Z W C -00.. C.O ... co-o >- Z ~ ~ o~ ~ ~~o IX~IX~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~OIXOCO~IX !:::.~ !;(IX ~ ~w...'" ~8~I'- ~. .......!i -w- .....- ~~CJ<_a:: we > ,.....0::. Z Wl.L ~U)U)c.:::c.:::c.::: 3....3 ClIXUll'--o.....~I"I<OO - co IX< ClNN>-OUO >Z>~OO~CI).....~~~~~~~a::~~~~~~CI)~~~~~~. ~~~CI)CI)~ ...O...-O......~.....<WWUlIX .....-....-oNN~ ~<~.....o..... IXo- OO~~O Z...Z..... IXI"I 3cocow....:..:IXO....................zw .....Ul...:..:IXWNIX~~ U i5~i5~dd8~~~~~COO~~ .~~~~~~~~~o-...J~~~~IX~~~O~ u::z:U,....:aZ:E_NUN...J:::J::zO"CJZ......N\.QNCC..... .Z,....NUO":z-NC8ZZ . -ea Z 00 -... ........ 5~ OIX ...J.... o IX >- IX IX W .... :z o ... ... < :t: Z 0 >- 00 IX >-0 IX 3 IXU 0 03IX 000..0 IX :..: 0.. IXIX IX w. IX IXo..ZOO< ...JCI)~z.....j~ u o.....~~~a::a::CJ =~ ~~>~o5o~~~5~~~~ :t:<~ :t:UlOIX<IX~IXZ 'Cl-O< ~O~~ZE ~ ~ewQ~ ~E OIX<U....W~OQOIX~W<OOIXIX ~~~~~~u~~~~~~~~6<~ LI'l N -0 CO-..:t---CO o LI'l 1"1 1'-1"1 I'- 1'--0-0-0-0-0 ~I"I~ !2~!2 -~-'lQ-o.- $as!2~~:;?;$ C C IXIX W :":0 o ZZCo..IX IX 0 o o IX... o OIX 0 Ul IX>-IX IX ......>-W...J IX IX 0 <<IX...J...J WD:::::J:W w a..D:::OI-I-D:::-'- ...WU> > < IXenUlW-~ <....<-0< OCl...J ....> ... OIXIX .....IX ...J"'>-'" enw cnzu ~cn cn--UJa&:::ZOU wwen:..:w enz:t:.......JwOIXz wO::CJwzcn:::W:::CXII:::J u..Z:CXII~c:C< ~~;:!:~~!i~~~53~~=~~~ ....3en....o..enO"...JCOIXO"~Cl:t::t:< -......-'lQN--......OCOO'-OIl'\N,." ~~!2~$~$~coR:;?;:;?;:;?;~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +41 . . +41 . . -.-.-.-.+-.-. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~re~~~~~~~~~~ ... Z W ~ Z Cl ...J < en ... - IX < o Z o U W Ul ... en o U Ul ... o g IX < W Z . >- <.... ...J....x 0..<- ... Ul Wul > ... -...0 UlOp ~g;> :t: W W >-:t: IX CO... 0.. ~ZZ 00- U- ... Cl W<Z :t:...J_ ....... C Z Z Z-::) - .... IX "'Ow Z....> W _ ~OWCl ZWUZ <.::Jt-w- -~O:O . -'::::) z z<....O::) < Ol-u.. ...JO< o..w 0'" (I) ..we ~~53tig wo...w >-IX < 0.. IX o..~XO x -w..... -W'" (I)::J:~cnw I-WI--' ... U~ ZZI-UJ- woen....Cl IX 00- Ol:QUCX-' ::)w o..w UulO <Z3... zco<WO Z Z . . 4l -. + '"" V) I- Z w ::IE: w > o 00: 0.. ::IE: CO 00- < 0' 00: ...... ~8: <~ o Z::> 000: U'" WI- V) I""l 00:0- o ... 0 >-N =8: oo:~ o 00: 0.. >- I- Z a U W ..... 00: < ::IE: W co ..... < I- Z W ::IE: OW WV) I- _ <I- ::IE: 00: -WW 1->1- V)O< W<O 00: o ...V)>- 0-- >1- 000:00: oo:wo <0..- 0::>00: co V) 0.. Z ClO>- Z-I- -V)- Z V) 00: z-o <::E- ~~g: U N~~:O~~~c;~ 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0. ...................................................... ..........................................~~ ............................................,.................... ...... 0: I- ...... V)N o~ U.... o o 00 0 00 ..., 00>-0 I ... ...at-- I C)C)~COI on 0 I- -N(I)...:t o o o 000000000000000 0000 '00000000000000 0000000000000000000 "'0 0 0 Lt\ ... .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. o 'N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on on 0 0 0 0 0 O~~~ .....:t~~OO_ONNOLt\ONO ~COCOCO~o.~l""ll""lo.NI""l"""onl""l~"""NCO Z o - I- 0.. 00: U V) W o 00: 00: o 0 I- I- 'U U UJUJW w >>Z ZCICICICI OOZ ZZZZZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 00:00:0 0----<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< o..o..U UXXXXOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO %%" ~~~~~~~~~~<<~~~~ --oooet:l::t::IC::t::O::: <<<00:00:00:00:000000000000000 . .000 WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW OO:OO:OO:OO:OO:WWWW>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~~333~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ zzwwwo:::o:::o:::o:::zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz --ZZZClClClCI::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::>::> Z 00 -l- I- ...... ;5~ 000: ........ N ...... ti:i N~~ Ie V)I- 1-0....... ..... zV) OO:~ ~V) co..... U ~'" "'I-~I-- ~g < ......1- 000: OO:::IE: V) on~W'" W .::E::E -0 ~~Z-0v)3Zv)""" . N""'WOOO~::>1""l "<~~%EEE~~~~~~~o~~~~~g~ ~~~~~NI""lCO~~~~~~~~~~onl""l~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W I-W a~ oo:Z 00 00:00: ::IE:::IE: -- WW '" '" Z Z WW .......... coco o o 00: 0 00: 0 00: OO:OZ ..... 0 li!b wOO:"'" 80li! 0 00: ~ o 0.. ClZZ "'00: OO:OWOV) 0 O:::~w o~w u ~ O:::~O:::- 0::: <0 -::EO V) V) 0.. V) 0 >0 COCl 00: 00:0 ~OO>-W-Z oo:Z ::> ""'1- W<oo:..... "'OO:OO:OO:OO:OZ 0 ~~=~~~~z= u>-~~~~<~~ <x~~oo:o: w<w~~w~~w I-::IE: OO:""'WI-I- ~W300:v)WI-ZO~ ~~~~=~~~~~~8~~~~B~~ :~o:::~~~zmO:::C~E(I)~OUE~O woo: I- W a~ 00:::> Z NN NN ~~ ~~NONON~O"""o-~coo-on""""""on~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~R~~~~~~ ~ .............................................................................................................................................................................................. .. .. .. -... .. .. .. .. .. O'O~NI""l~on~......COo-O~NI""l~on~......COO'O~N ~...:t~~~~~~~~~Lt\Lt\Lt\Lt\Lt\Lt\Lt\Lt\Lt\Lt\~~~ ~ on co N o on co co 0. r:.. 8: ~ l- V) o U ::> 00: '" I- I""l 0. o N 8: ~ ..... < I- o I- Z < ..... 0.. Z o - I- U ::> 00: l- V) Z o U >- 00: < o Z o U W V) 00: < W >- X V) I- o g W '" I- Z CI Z o Z ::> ... W > W U W 00: ZO <I- ..... 0..0 W 00: I- -0.. X XW - V) V) I- I-U Z W W""> 00:0 00:00: ::>0.. U 3 Z W - Z .. -. 00 0\ I Q) N r-l 0\ H 0\ CU ..-l S Q) Q),.o .cr-l +J<t: l.l4 l.l4 o 0 >.,00 p.,H o 0 u 00 .M +J :> U H Q) Q) H p., H ;I OU) U l.l4 ~ 0 Q) ;1"0 H H +J CU o cuj:Q 00 Q) .M .c +J 00 H o 00 .M :> H Q) p., ;I U) >., +J ~ ;I o U l.l4 o "0 ~: u 00 N P >., 0\ .M ..0 0\ +J ..-l .M "0 H Q) :3+J0\ p.,..-l 000 P "0 >., -nCUH o CU 00>.,;1 Q) r-l H H 00..0 o ;I Q) l.l401'L< S Q) .M P .c ~ 0 +J CU ~"O +J;lr-l CU Q) .cp.c +J CU r-l 00 ~p.. P l.l4 .M .M +J +J +J P Q) H Q) Q) Q) S S U Q) :> H ~ 0 CU ,.oHr-l ~~6'0 Q) H Q) .c H "0 o (1j CU "0 0 P:: +J CU H >., Q) H .c CU CU Q) "0 .M Z P P o .M U 00 rz:l Q) H U) .M ::> Q) OM H +J CU +J Q) Q);>-l H ~ ~ .M Hu) >., +J P ;I o u VI ... % W :E W > o 0: 0. :E CO ~o. O. 0: I'- ~~ <~ o %:::l 00: U::J: W... VI "., 0:0. o LL 0 >-N ::::~ o:~ o 0: 0. >- ... % a U W ...J 0: < :E W co ...J < II II II 0.11 .....11 ~NII z...u W II :ElL II OWO WVl "'_VI <...< :EO: -ww ...>... ff3~~ LL ...0 VI OVl U< % 00 -... ........ 5~ 00: ...J LL OW <:E 0< 0:% wo: ...w a~ O::::l % II II II II II II II II II II 0: II 0 II LLVI>- II 0-'" II >- II 00:0: II o:wo II <0.- II 0:::lO: II co VI 0. II II II :z: C>O>- :z:-... - VI- :Z:VlO: :Z:-O <:E- ...J:EO: 0.00. U ,..,..,..,..,..,..,..,..~~,..,.. ~St~StSt~St~g~g~ ................................................................. 1.1'\..0--1"0-1.1'\-4''''...0 -4''''''''' """'''''''....,'''''''''''''''' ""''''''''' ,.. ,.. I'- I'- ,.. 0. 0. >0 ..........0. 00..... ~~I'- ............... ,.. ,.. ~~ .......... ~ I'- .......... 0: ..... N ~ . . o g Rg""~ go~ ~gggggg g o OOI'-O~~o>o>ooo~o"., -oooo~oooooo 00 ..0 .. .. ... ...0...0-. ... ... ..0 ...... ... .. ... .. ..00 ..000 I ~gg~~~~~~~~gg$~~~ggg~~~~~~~~: o ...ON~~~~O~OIJ"\O...O~ ..OU"\N..-U"\OOOOOO' ~~~~~~~~~~~N"'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o o 00000000 00 ...00000 00000000 ... -0 ............... O~OO~OOO U"\N -ONOOO t"lLn...I"'\...:t......,.,.. % o ... 0. 0: U VI W o 0: VI -> ~ fa t . UJ . 0 ar::: . . . f'd w ~ ac: &X I- to- I- t-~I- w .>t-_ t-t- 11-1-1-2> -1-1-1- UCJ....O.. 'UUUCJCJ:z ~zoo~ar:::Z~~t-~~0Z0 W0~~ wzwwwwU"\wwwwwwzzw ~~~~~co~~~~~~~8~ ~~~~ ox~~~~~~~~oooxxffi ~t- ~U_ar:::UU'UUU'% ar:::uuu ar::: ar:::ar:::&Xar:::oar:::ar:::ar:::ar:::ar:::ar::: > a: ~ ~ - ~ ...8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ i: ~ ~ ~ ~ Q. ~ !i i: i: i: ~ ~ ~ i: Q. Q. Q. : ~ ~ ... . 0:1: 0 0 '00- Ow ---- ---www Q. ~ .t-ar:::ar:::ar:::,ar:::ar:::ar:::ar:::ar:::&xar:::ar:::&x&x ar:::ar:::ar:::ar:::CJW U CJCJCJwW:E zar:::zwo 000 000 W 1-000 CCI-I-I-I-WI-I-I-OOCOQ- CJwc(t-.3-..3...3t-330...3-<00000000---<< -o.....JZ c(wo:::<c(wc(<c(wzw wo..< c(c(w ar:::ar::: 0.. 0.. 0..0.. '0.. 0.. 0.. ar:::ar:::ar::: ar:::ar:::o 0o._~zm~~:~~lz_zz0~~~zmo~0000000:mmo:0 w 0 >00. 0.0 ... CO >0 >-:z: 0: ~ o~ ~ ~~o o:~o:~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~oo:oco~o: ~~ ~o: ~ ~w...'" 58~1'- ~. .......~ -w- .....- CO"-CJc(.-~ we >- ......t-Ol:. :z: WLL. o..(/)(/)~~~ 3LL3 ~O:VlI'->O""':E""<oo - co 0:< C>NN>-OUO .- :z: ~~~%-~~~~ :z:~t-t-~-o_~~u :z:~~(/) ~ >-z>-~oO<~""''''''~''''''~~NW ~~~ ~(/) ~~"- N<. --- m ...O...>O......:E.....<WWVlO: ....._LL>ONN :E<~""'O"'" 0:0. OO:E 0 :z:...%..... 0:"., 3cocoWLL~O:0....................%W .....VI...~O:WNO:~~ U a~a~dd8~~~~~coo~~ .~~~~g~~~~0'...J~~~~O:55~ ~ U~U"-::IZ%_NUN~::IZO"CJ:z:"-N~N<LL. .Z"-NUo..Z-Nca:z:Z. ca o 0: >- 0: 0: W LL :z: o ... ... < ::J: % 0 >- 00 0:>-0 0: 3 O:U 0 030: 000.0 0: ~ 0. ~~ ~ W ~ ~~ZCO< ~~~Zt-j~ U Ct-~~~~~CJ ~~ .....~-3 ~ ~(/)0l:0l:t->-.....(/) ~~~:E::J:~~~~O:~O:~~~~~~ <<O~.....Z% ~ ~owo~ ~~ ~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~%~LL.OU~%~~""'CJ%~O<~ 00 0:0: C zzc 0: 0 000: o 0<>< 0: >- 0: 0: 0: WD!:%W W ...WU> > c(LL.c(-Oc( O<.:J~ ..... eD!:~ .....~ ~t->-t- (/)ZU .....(/) (I)--U,HXZ WW(l)~W cn%%LL....Jwo ~~~~~~~~~o~~~::: O:<...<...J:::l<<o:wO::::l-< LL.::I(I)~~(I)~...JcnlX~~CJ::J: Ln co....r..-..-..-co N O~""I'-""I'- >0 1'->0>0>0>0>0 _,,-_..oN..-_"-OOJo-...-OLn ~~~~$~$~a;R~~~~ ~".,~ ".,~ >01'- ..-~-\.Q..-o-..- $as~~~~$ + . . ~+ . . . _. -. -. -. + -.-. .........O~N ~~>OI'-COO'O~N".,~~>OI'-COO'O~N".,~~>OI'-CO _N~~~~~~~___ ------NNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM~~ ... % W :E % ~ ...J < VI ... - 0: < o :z: o U W VI ... VI o U VI ... o ~ 0: < W :z: . >- <LL ...JLLX 0.<- ... VI WVI > ... -"'0 VlOO :z:o> W> ::<: W W >-::J: 0: co... 0. ~~:: U- ... C> w<% ::J:...J_ ... LL 0 :z::z: :Z:-:::l _ LL 0: ...Ow :Z:LL> W :EOWC> ::zwu:z: C:H- w - -cnc.:::c ....J => :z: %<,O:::l c( O.....LL. ...JO< ~W 0..... (/) ...we ~~fDt;~ wo.....w >-c.:::<c~c.::: Q.:EXO X _WLL. -w", cn:I:(I)(/)W .....w........J ... uco :Z:ZI-W- wO(l)~~ <>< 00- ~ouc.:::...J ::JW ~w UVlO <:z:3'" :ZCOc:(WO :z::z: . .. -. + .- .. z- mz lI: n "OC: "'''' 0'" c....m mz n..... ..... UlUl mx X "0-< mm n> .....'" m 0"0 .- .....> OZ '" m n m < m .... c: z o z C'l z ..... :z: m ~ o ..... Ul X -< m > '" Ul m n o z o > '" -< n o z Ul ..... '" c: n ..... o Z "0 .- > Z ... :8 N , -0 VI ..... :z: '" c: ... :8 ~ -0 CO ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~VI N"'O-oco~~~~~~=~~~~~~~WN"'O-o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~--------------------- ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~W~~~ O-W~O~O ~~~___~_~_~ ~~~~~-oco -o~O"'NONON"'~ CI%nO~~X~O~=ZI~~~~% nze~i~~o~n~~~~~~~~i ~oz~m~~cm~ ~~ml~ ~~ mUl.....m.....Ulm>m :Z:O:Z:UlC-<:Z:> "'>>"'.....~.....-< ~-z o~ -zn ~~-~ m~ n I ~~~~I~I o ZO"'''''''''':z: .-",>m ......- c: Z~ z-m~oo O~ ~ ~m 0< 0 Ul "OUlUl o~_ 0> ~ -~~~ ~ n m~o m~~ o UlOmo", "':z: ZZC'l "0 0 ~ '" 0 ~08 .-",m S~ o r- zc::v '" 0 '" 0"'0 o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ONNO~~O~~ ~~~~VI~~~~~~~~~~~coWN~~~~~ ~5~~~~~~n~~~~~~%%~~~~~~~ ~S ~iio~'-N . ~Ul~lI:UlO~~i:;:!~ Ul ~'" "'0 ....., > gi:;:! -.....~......... :z:~ n '-co Ul~ ~'" UlZ .- ~-o..... .....Ul ~ 0- m CO CO N ..... ~ N ..... C:CC:C:C:C:C:C:C:C:CC:C:C:C:C'lC'lC'lC'lZZZ__ o ZZZZZZZZZZZZZzz~~~~mmmzz ..... "O"O"O"O"O"O"O"O"O"O"O"O"O"O"O>>>>lI:lI:lI:.......... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>0000 mm .- <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<mmmm",,,,,,,,,,,,, mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 000. . n 000000000000000"''''''''''>>> o ::v::v::v~COO__ ~ ::V::V::v::v::v::v::v::v::v::v::v::v::v::v::v "XX ..... OOOOOOOOOOOOOooxxxxn n"O"O ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ZZZZ~ ~~~ C')C")C")C")% Z<< ~~ ~~m ..... ..... o 0 '" '" ~ coN~~W~~WN-oWW~-o"'cococo'" ONO~ONNO-OO~~~- ~~~O OOOOO~~OOOOOOON_'_ 0 ... ... ... ... .. .. .. .. ... ... .. ... ... .. \J1 0 0 0'" 0000000000000000000 00000000000000" 0000 000000000000000 0 o o .f'(I)f\J..... ... ...... C) V1 ICOCOO 1-....0.. ... 10-<00 00 o 00 o o ~ o N CO ~ ~ .......................--........--- _.....~-....-...-...................-.... ................................................................... :8:8~~~~~~;e --------- n ;gi~ -~> o-z "'UlZ -Ul- .....-Z -<0C'l Z "OUlI:D "'CO -"0> om", "''''0 .....< --0 -<Ul.... o '" Z c:'" ~~ ~e NN NN m..... ",m I:DI:D Z'" .- .- ~e mm zz m..... :z::z: m mm ~~ "'''' 00 .... .- "'0 i~ ,..... .....- 00 Z o m Ul n '" "0 ..... o Z ""'n "'0 NUl ,..... ~ o>m >0<1) .....<..... mm- II ::::0% II ~)> II --I It (l)m II mo " ~ " m " Z " ..... " " " " " lr ~- > .- I:D m ~ > '" .- m n e Z ..... -< "0 '" o ... '" :8:; N-< . .... o -0'" W Ul .....m :z:n "'0 C:Z o ...> :8~ ~ '" '0 > -00 CO 3: "0 '" o < m ~ m Z ..... <I) r " l "?~^fo' '5L q/,/z..( ( .~~'--' ~({J;/ Z If .().Lj ;i COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors vftJ~WL- V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community Development DATE: December 4, 1991 RE: Six-Year Secondary Road Plan Attached please find information on the Six-Year Secondary Road Plan. Attachment 1 is the priority list as recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. Attachment 2 is background information provided by the Virginia Department of Transportation Resident Engineer's Office. Attachment 3 is a draft of Virginia Department of Transportation's proposed Six-Year Road Plan based on the Commission's recommended priority list. Two scenarios are provided. Attachment 3A is the Six-Year Plan without Revenue Sharing funds. Attachment 3B is the Six-Year Plan assuming $6 million in Revenue Sharing funds over the six year period ($1 million/year). Virginia Department of Transportation and Planning Staff will be available to discuss this package at the Board's worksession on December 11, 1991. VWC/blb cc: Mr. Bob Brandenburger Mr. Dan Roosevelt II ATTACHMENT 2 I~~)JWQ SEP 20 1991 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA PLANNING DiVISION RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902 September 17, 1991 ~.~ ; .. .' ,'" . """#", "~ D. S. ROOSEVELT RESIDENT ENGINEER Mr. David Benish Department of Planning 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 1992-98 Six Year Plan Albemarle County Dear Mr. Benish: It is time to revise the six year plan for Albemarle County. Attached is a listing of the estimated funds available for construction for 1992-93 thru 1997-98. The regular construction allocation for the six year period is $15,725,364. Although there are no restrictions on how these regular construction funds are used, it has been VDOT policy to have a balanced plan. We are recommending that a portion of these funds be used on bridge replacements and to upgrade railroad-highway grade crossings. At tas.heJ! is a .lLs t:j"ng of _.I:l.ri<i&-es .yi th low_ sufficiency ratings and railroad ~rossings which are eligible tor upgrading. The allocation of $4,~98,740 for unpaved roads is to be used for gravel road improvements as required by the Code of Virginia. The routes in the gravel road list are in order of priority in the current six year plan. The right of way on Route 615 was available in June 1990 and we are recommending that Route 615 be included in the revised plan. All incomplete construction projects in the current plan are shown on the list with updated cost and current funding. There is also a column which shows the cumulative totals of additional funding necessary to complete the projects. Please review the attached lists and contact this office to schedule meeting to discuss the revision of the six year plan. We would like to work toward the Board of Supervisors approval of a revised plan by February 1, 1991. I GGtI/yrm Yours truly, b{ 1.<<1 Contract Administrator attachments TDANCDf"\DTATIr\"-I enD TUC: .,1l"'T ,...r-"'t'Tlln'\l I >-l f-'" f-O P P f-'" P "'1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ><: H >-l 1.0 1.0 1.0 \D \D \D t%] tIl ;I>' -.J 0) tT1 ,l:>. W N ;I>' Cl t""' I I I I I I ::0 ;I>' 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 t""' ro -.J 0) tT1 ,l:>. W {J"r I p I {J"r tIl tT1 I N N N N N N t%] I , ::0 Cl -J I ro -.J 0) tT1 tT1 ~ C1 t%] 0 N I 1.0 ~ p 0 f-'" ~ 0 Gl Z tT1 I 0 ro w ro \D ~ Z c: 0 I , tIl t""' ;I>' W I N -J 0 tT1 -.J \D >-l ;I>' f-'" ::0 0) I 0) 0) 0) ro ~ ,l:>. ::0 1.0 ><: ,l:>. I 0 0) W ~ -.J ,l:>. 1.0 ;I>' I N C1 t""' I 0 tp 1.0 Z t%] w tIl 3: ::0 ;I>' rt" >-l ::0 ::T c: t'" "'I C1 t%] c: >-l H Cl I f-'" 0 0 {J"r I 1.0 Z c: ,l:>. I 1.0 Z , I {J"r c: -J )>0 >-l N I -J -J -J ,0) en 0) ::0 Z I t'" ><: 1.0' I ro ,l:>. p ro 1.0 -J 0 "0 1.0 t'" ro/ I 0) ro N ro N .... )>0 )>0 ro 0 I , 0 <: C1 -.J I f-'" W P ~ f-'" tT1 tIl t%] )>0 ,l:>. I f-'" ,l:>. p 1.0 0 -J 0 >-l 0 I tT1 0 N N tT1 en H I 0 Z C/l ~~ {J"r I N I {J"r 0 I W W W W W W , I , >-l 0 I en ~ w f-'" N p 0 N I -J \D N 1.0 f-'" .... >-l ,l:>. I en -.J tT1 -.J p 0) )>0 I , t'" f-'" I W f-'" I-> 0 ro tT1 0 I -J 0 -.J -J tT1 N ,l:>. I tT1 en tT1 en N 0 I - --- 2-- ~~,~~A~~~~WWWWWW(~WWl',J~NN~~~~~~~~.00L. ~~OO~~~N~O~~~~NN~~OOO~N~~~~AWW~OWN~ ------------'-'---'-'-~------------------_-.....""----- mmm~m~oom~m~mmmm~~moomm~mmmmmmm ~~w~~oo~WOWN~O~~~~~m~w~~w~~ww~ ~~~NN~o~oo~m~~~~ww~m~~woo~~~~~~ 00 mm ~~ lD~ I I 00 00 NN I I ~ ~ ~ lil ~ .... 000 m~m w~~ ~NN 1 I I 000 000 NNN I I I 0000 ~oom~ OO~wO ~O~co I I I I 0000 0000 NNNN I I I I 0000 m~mm WN~O ~ m ~.~ I I I I 0000 0000 NNNN I I 1 I 00 mm ~-~ ~~ I I 00 00 NN I I 000 ~~m ~~~ WWlD I I I 000 000 NNN I I I ~ ~ CO 00 com m'U) m ~ I I 00 a-a NN I I NN WW m~ 0000 m~mm W~~W ~"W 00 ~ I '1 I 1 0000 0000 NNNN I I I 1 ~~NN oo~NN U1WW~ 00 mm -l-l .... ~ I I 00 00 NN I I ~ ~ ~~ .... .... tJ:l0 COCO 0 0tJ:l0 00000tJ:l 0tJ:l0000 0000 0tJ:l mU1 U1mU1U1U1U1U1U101 WO 00~00000~ 0.... ~~~....N~N....m tJ:l > tJ:l tJ:l ::0'0::0::0 H'UHH o ::0 0 0 G'l 0 G'l G'l t:l>trltrl o o :J: > > <trll-ll-ll-l MUl 0 ::0 H l-l < ::0 00><: l-l Ul M X OJ 0 ::0 ::0 ::OHM > t:J trl H G'l :;.; t"' M ::0 o 0 > < o trl ::0 > l-l 0 Ul X ::0 > H t"' ::0 o > o ::0::0::0 000 C c: c:: -ll-ll-ll-l OMtrltrl Nm o l-l o ::0 l-lm M ::0::0 l-ll-l t'l tJ:l:> ::0'0 H'U t:J ::0 Gl. t'1 NN l-l ....U100 00< t>1tJ:l ~l-ll-ll-l::O::O 000 H 00 ::0 ::0 ::0 Ul G'l 3:00l-lXM HCCt'l l-l l-l ::0 0 MMN>< ~Ht'l t"'::O CO::O ><:00 'U>Ul >OX Ul ell ::0 > H t"' ::0 o > o ::OUltJ:l.... l-l 0 ::0 . tt]t""l-iW o OGl3: N:J:t'lH ~ < 0 Ul H < . t"' t'l t"'::O::O M l-l 3:t'l l-l 0 oom ::O~ -l::03: ....l-l>l-l NMZO ::0::0 Hl-l <t'l t'l ::O-l o m -l l-llD 0U1 > 3: 3: o Z t'l l-l l-l tJ:l ::0 I > Z o ::z; N ~Ul ....m ::0 Woo Ull-lO~ '0 N O~ l-l0 00 HIUl 3:Ul'U Ul '0'0 0 'U::OOl-l 00l-l l-l< M H 3: 3:M ttJZ ::0 l-l OUl < m Ul W ttJ .... o l-l ttJ ::0 o "'1 H ~ H Ul 3: '0 '00 ::0 l-l o <: H 3:3: trlttJ Z::O l-l0 Ul <: H H 3: 3: '0 ttJ ::0 ::00 o <: <:. ....0 (]1-l ON tJ:l > ::0 '0 H '0 t:J ::0 G'l trl l-l o 0 < t'ltJ:l ::0::0 H ::0 t:J H G'l <M > Z 0 Z <: > t'l ::0 ::0 H Z < t'l "'1 ::0 ::O::OH Ol-lZ CMl-l l-l t'l.... ~ NU1 ~ U1 -lm .!::-U1 W-l 3: NH U1 OUl l-l o ::0 l-l ::0 t'l o-l trlm .!::- o <: < H trl t"' ::0 t"' t'l 3: o l-l OJ 0 0 ::0 ::0 H3:Ul 0>0 G'l Z t'l ::0 ::0 OH::O < < MM ::0 ::0 3: t'l 3: > o 0 o 0 ::0 ~ 3: 0 :> ::0 Z M Ul M :;.; ::0 H ttJ <: :;.; M ><: ::0 00 mm W W .... .... I I 00 00 NN 1 I .... .... NN coco , , (ltJ:l00 ~mU1U1 0....00 NN........ 00 m-l ~O .!::-oo I I 00 00 NN I 1 NN ~.!::- N.... ::0> l-l l-l M H ....Z .!::-l-l o m m ~ m .... o o -lOrn O. N oo~~ H o M ttJ t"' > Z l-l 3: H X o ::0 00 c: ~l-l HM o M :J:ttJ :>H l-l ttJ l-lM o Ul z,ttJ Ul ::0 "'1HO M G'l c... ::OZM ::OUlO ::0' l-l ><:t'l l-l o o '1l 'UH M'1l ~ ~1 o-l.... HZ OUl Zl-l > Ot"' "'1 t"' > :J: l-l >HO l-lOM l-lZ!Jl OUl(l Z' ::0 Z H "'1M'U trl~l-l ::0 H ::OUlO ><:HZ G'l Z Ul Ul M M o H Z G'l , M l-l o o t"' M Z H 3: 'U ::0 l-l0 o < ::0(0) l-l::O t'll-l / ::0 H <: > Z Z :> ::0 H <: M ::0 l-l o ::0 o c: l-l M-l ~N mW~N o o~m m--- I w~ Ztn ....Z.... M ::OIM ~::Z;H~~3: HO::Z; H > Gl ..:: > . t"':J:::OOt"' H O::OHUl G'lUl' >G'l Zl-l CZ 3: . t"' 3: ::0 trl HMl-l Z OZ l-l l-lm ::O---.!::- o o o N ON ........ ~....~.!::-N U1(]1 ~ .... U1U1N~.!::-~WNU1-lU1~U1~.!::-omNw~NommU1~woow~N mo~ 00....000U1U1~N(]10NOOOOOO-lNU10U1.....!::-N(]10COOOmooo 00~0000U1U100(]1000000~0(]100Nm~00mooooUl~ .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1'-3 > 000000000000000000WOOOO~0U100-l0000 t"' OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONoooomowoo~oooo 000000000000000000U10000mO-l00NOOOO 00000000000000000 l-ll-l 00 ::0 ::0 l-l 0 t'lc: l-l M N ~ N~.!::--lU1(]1-l lDoo.!::-co.!::-w~mo 1-"(]1U1U1~.!::-U1NO .. ... ... ... ... WomOONmU10 ~o~oow~eno ocooenoo.!::-w~o .... 0.... O~ 00 , .. U10 00 0000 00 ttJ >%1::0 c:t'l Z<: OH H 0 ZC G'lUl en -lo-l 000 > ........ .... I-"~ ~I-" N ~ I-" 0 .. >%1 0 ~~N~.!::-""WN~-lU1""U1~.!::-oenN"" OOONOO WenOOWNN enCH 00....000U1U1~NU10NOOOOOOCOWOI-"0-l ~U10ooU10mOZl-l 00~0000U1U100U1000000-.lU1lDU1m-.l ooOomOOOOOH ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... .. ... .. ... .. .. ... ... ..... H 0 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OWOO~WlDOONOOOOZZ 000000000000000000-l0000WU1-l00-l0000G'l> OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-lO.!::-OON-lNOONOOOO t"' o N o 0000000.... wenU1....lDenN.... OWOO~-lOlD NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN....I-"~....~........ lDOOOO-l-l-l-lmenmU1.!::-wNI-"I-"OlDOO-l-l.W........COOO-lWNNI-" ... .. ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... I-"m~lD-lw....00U10N-len....enNNm.!::-NNNw....WWlDN.!::-....00 NNN~WWooWw....mmwwwwwww~~ooooooo.!::-~~....en mmen....~~l-'....en........l-'mmmmmmenOOw.!::-U)WU1U1enmmoo l-l o mm~ eno> 001:' , Ul OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOooooooU1U1U1mNNNNOOOO ~l-'~l-'''''l-'l-'~l-'l-'l-'I-''l-'l-'''''l-'l-'l-'l-'~wwwwO.!::--l-l-lOOOO ~~~~~~~~~""~~~""~~~~~-.l-lWww",,""NNNOOOO ::01-" trllD GllD CN 1:'1 >lD ::ow o ~ o ::z; Z::o Ul c: ::0 l-ll-" ClD OlD ~-.l HJl OiD zco Ul M (l o Z o >> ::ot"' ><:tJ:I M (l3: 0> Z::C Ult"" ::ot": ~ cr: (lO ~c HZ 0>-: ZO-< ttJ ::0 o G'l ::0 :to' :3: O"'1:to' CCO 3:Z0 COH t"'Hl-l >ZH ~G'l0 H Z <: > ,~ >' ~J t'-' N ~ ~ () 0 H "'1 ------..- " :r>' tJj ::0 ::0 " M O"'t O"'t O"'t 0"'t0"'t O"'t 0 t%J <: O"'t O"'t N NOO C M -J -J -J -JOO ~ ::0 Z t%J M C Gl t%J C " l/l 0 0 0 0 0 0 :r>' ::c O"'t O"'t 0'\ O"'t O"'t O"'t ::0 :r>' O"'t O"'t N N 0 0 ::0 -J -J -J -J 0 0 n H I I I I I I 0 Z 0 00 0 0 0 "j Z Gl 0 00 0 0 0 ::0 l/l N NN N N N 0 ~ :E: I I I I I I '-' ::0 ::c t%J r-' H n (5 n ~ ~ ::c , , , , H OJnOJn OJ n 0 H Z l/l "1 :r>' C Z Z t-3 t:l H OJ :r>' OJ :r>' OJ > l/l n ::0 "0 ::0 "0 ::0 "0 H H "0 H "0 H "0 "1 "0 t:l ::0 t:l ::0 t:l ::0 0 :r>' Gl Gl Gl ::0 t-3 M M t%J M t-3 >-3 t-3 t--' t:l 0 0 0 0 0 0 \D <: <: <: \D t-3 t%J OJ M OJ t%J OJ N 0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 I H H H \D OJ "0 t:l OJ t:l :3: t:l W tx1 H Gl :r>' Gl t%J Gl Z tx1 t"' tx1 n tx1 t:l t-3 {f} tx1 t"' ::c tx1 ::c 0'\ ><: 0 H 0 C 0 r..n. ::0 <: Z <: z <: n c 0 n t%J Gl t%J ;:.: t%J ::0 0 ::0 ::0 t%J ::0 ::0 H t--' 0 t%J ::0 n "0 \D tx1 "0 OJ ::0 :3: t-3 \D 0 ;:.: H n > tx1 t%J H -J 0 Z ::0 t"' tx1 n 0 Ul I 0 tx1 tx1 t"' ;:.: ::c z t%J \D ><: t%J H C n 00 H ;:.: Z Z 0 Ul n Gl ;:.: Z ::0 tx1 ::0 t--' t:l {f} Z tx1 ::0 n M \D > > t--' 0 tx1 ::0 Gl 1.0 ::0 t"" U1 t-3 ;:.: n tx1 C N 0< III , ;:.: M t"" I M -J H ;:.: > \D (1 :3: N Z ::0 W 0 > U1 n Z ::0 , t"' (1 t-3Ul t"" / W C 0 ::C::O M O"'t t:l Z ::0 t-3 .l>o tx1 Ul C C (1 t:l ::0 n 0 t-3 t--' ~ C H C 1.0 H Z Z t"' (1 1.0 0 >-3 M t-3 -J ZO< t-3 I Z H I "O.~ 0 0 \D ~ Z 00 ::0 > 0 t"' Gl Ul ::0 NI--t--'.........l>on >-3 > O-JOO-J.l>ot--'O 0 :3: 0t110U100l/l ~ , , , , , , ~ > 000000 t"' 000000 000000 "0 "1 ::0 C M Z <: t:l H H 0 Z C Gl Ul 000000 > t:l "1 t:l Nl-"t--'t--'t--' .l>oC H O-JOO-J,l:>.t--'Z >-'l 0t110t1100t:l H , , , , , , H 0 OOOOOOZ Z 000000(;1 > 000000 t"' WWWNNN 0001.01.01.0 ~ n "'l > ~ ~ , ~ , , 0 C C t:l .l>oNOOOO"'tU1 ~ :3: Z t:l OOWU1-JW > C t:l H 0"'t0"'t........O"'t0"'t t"' t"' H ~ , , , , , , Ul > Z H 00 00 00 00 CXl 00 '"":l Gl 0 'i t--' .... .... t--' .... .... H Z .l>o.l>o.l>ool:>ool:>o.l>o <: > ::<1 * o C ::<1 >-:l H ~ 9:: Ul ... >-:l > ::00 ~"l t'" :z H > Ul >< t-j ~ > t:l <: > H H Z t'" > o to ::0 t'" t:l ~ t<l ::0 ~ C o Z "l ~ 'i:l..... ::0\.0 H\.O o 0 ::<1 H >-:l >< H Z ('l C ::0 ::0 t<l Z >-:l Ul H X >< ~ > ::0 'i:l t'" > Z > <: > H t'" > to t'" t<l Cl ::0 > <: ~ t'" ::<1 o > t:l > t'" t'" o " > >-:l H o Z "l o ::<1 ..... \.0 \.0 N 1 W >-:l ::c ::0 C ..... \.0 \.0 -J 1 \.0 CP {/} ~ , N \.0 CP -J ~ o ...--..----------------- *WlJWe.lWWl.lWWWWWWW cncnG'lcncncncncncncncncncncn -------------- 0"l0"l-J-J0"l0"l0"l-J0"l-J0"l-J-J0"l0"l .....O.....WO"lO-JOCPUlWO"l..........CP UlO"l.....-J-JVi\.OCPCP\.O-JONON 0.0 0"l0"l .....0 UlO"l I 1 00 00 NN I I 000000000 0"l0"l0"l-J0"l-J0"l-J-J O"lO-JOCPUlWO"l..... -JUl\.OCPCP\.O-JON I I I I I I I I I 000000000 000000000 NNNNNNNNN I I I I I I I I I ~J o N ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ Ul o ..... 00 -J-J .....W .....-J I I 00 00 NN I I 00 0"l0"l .....CP ON I I 00 00 NN I I 'i:l W W ZZ Ul o ..... ::0 >-:IN ~ ~ Z O"l W::o \.O>-J ::<1::O.....Cl >-J >-J. ::0 ~~O"l~ ~ ~Z NO"lZ~ \.0 >-J ::0 ('l o >-J . t'" O"lO"lN ::OO"l.....W\.ON >-:lWO"lUl \.0 Ul >-:l >-J>-JO>-:l >-:l00 0 o ::0 "l::<1>-:l::O t:lt"'>-J~>-J ~c~ ~ > <: CP t:l> z 3: ~z t::l~3:Z> Ul~t:l Cl ('l ::<1 ::0 ::0 >-J>-:l t'" >-J >-JCOO OUl 0::<1 t'" >-:l O>-:lt::l~ C 0 :z >-:l H 0 Ul.....-J::O >. ..... >-J ::0 -J N. >-:l ('l O~ Z ::0 >-:l -J-J WI.O CPUl >-J>-:l o 0 O"l WO"l Ul>-:l o \.Ow -J 0"l.....0"l CPN\.O N N t'" H Z t<lCO Ul o -J N-J O"l-J O"l ('l-J0"l . W N t"'COO O......O...........OONOON.....ONN . Ul-JUlNNCO-J.....-JO"lNUlCPWUl OOUlOUlWUlONOOW-JOO I NCPW-J~W~-JWN\.OUlW\.ON NOUlOmONNO.....ONm~Ul OOOOOOUlUlOOOmOOO ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000 -J W CP N 000000000000000 NCPW-J~W~-JWN\.OUlW\.O..... NOUlOUlONNO.....ONUl~....,J OOOOOOmUlOOOUlOOen ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... 00000000000000..... OOOOOOOOOOOOOOCP 000000000000000 CPCO-J-JO"lUlUlUl~~WNNN"'" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... W.....WOWCPU1.....~.....CP\.O~.......... ....,JmmOOmUlNOO\.O\.Oen.........,J .....................................en....................(jl en en ................................................................................. CP CO CP CP CP CO CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP'CP 000000000000000 ::0 o C >-:l t<l 'i:l ::0 o ~ t<l ('l >-J t:l t<l Ul ('l ::0 H 'i:l >-J H o Z -J CP -J t'" ~ Z ..... C1 >-:l o 0 Ul >-:l >-J> t'i 'i:l "1::0 Ct<l Z< t:lH H 0 ZC Q Ul ...... > t:l "1t:l CH Z>-J t:lH HO ZZ Q> t'i ('l >-JC o ::3: >-JC >t'i t" > Ul>-J H <: ~ Ul t<l ('l o .....Z \.Ot:l \.0>> G1N::Ot'" ::Ol><to >\.0 t<l <:W('l::3: txl 0> t"'>-JZ::O ::c Ul t"' ::0 ::0 >-J txl OC::O > c('l t:l......('l0 Ul\.O>-JC \.OHZ -JO..., IZ>< \.0 CP'i:l ::0 o Cl ::0 > ::3: :~ 5 * * :+ * H Z ::0 Z 0 0 t:-< ..., -J en en en en en c: 0 t>l .l>- .l>- -J .l>- .l>- ()l ..., c: w 0 .... .... \.0 .... t>l 0 t>l 0 0 0 Ul H ..., Z Ul 0 :t- c: ::0 ::0 t>l en en en en en en Ul ::0 .... 0 0 0 0 .... Z ..., t>l 'rJ 0 .l>- (J1 .l>- ol>. N 0 ::0 Z 0 ol>. .... CO ol>. \.0 .l>- ..., ;;0 Ul OJ H ::0 X H 0 Z 0 3: 0 0 0 tl:l ><: G"l Ul 0 Ul Ul Ul ::0 t>l t>l X 0 X X x ::0 H :t- 'rJ ::0 :t- O ::0 0 0 ::0 3: ::0 ::0 ::0 0 >-i G"l :t- :z: ::0 :t- :t- :t- :t- :t- t>l H t>l t:-< "0 t:-< ::>: H :z: H H H Ul Z Ul tIl t:-< ><: t:-< Ul t:-< t:-< t:-< 0 G"l [%1 :t- ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 :e 3: Z H 0 ::0 0 0 0 H 0 H > Z <: > H :t- :t- > '"0 'Xl t-l ::0 0 0 <: 0 0 0 t-l ::r: t:-< t>l H N t>l > ::0 ::0 0 0 Ul '"0 H Z c: 0 "0 <: 0 'rJ 0 ::0 t>l ::0 'rJ c: 0 ::0 H Z > t:-< 0 t-l 0 t>l H ><: ::r: Ul t>l t>l Ul Z Ul ::0 0 > Ul ><: :t- N .... .... .... .... t-l c: ::0 0 CO -J en .... en H 'rJ t>l Z 'rJ .l>- en N N en 0 G"l H :z: / 0 t:-< c: 0 ::0 t>l t>l 0 '"0 {j} {j} {j} {j} {j} {j} t:-< H CO .l>- \.0 W m tv 0 > Z N N N 0 0 .... 0 0 ()l ()l N 0 0 ()l Ul t:rI .t ::;j .. .. .. .. t-l 3: .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 t:rI t>l 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 t-l 0 0 Ul t-l Ul 0 '"0 ::0 c: H ::0 w .... .l>- 0 ::0 .... .l>- \.0 ::0 t>l H Z t-l t-l ><: b * > 0 >-3 * H II ::0 ::0 Z l-" 0 0 (1 > W -J 0"\ C 0"\ 0"\ \..1) 0"\ 0"\ C t"' <: I-" .l::- I-" >-3 CP -J tJ tv 0 ..., C tXl 0 .l::- I-" tXl tv \!l -J t.1l tv tXl t:l ::0 tXl > t:l G1 tXl H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 . . . . > 0 0 tv tv tv -J -J 0 (1 H t.1l tv W W t.1l .I::- t.1l l-" 0 t"' C >< 3: :3: :3: :3: :3: :3: :3: 3: Z H H H H H H H H >-3 ..., >< ::0 Ul - > Ul Ul Z Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul "1 g "1 ::0 (1 H ::0 ::0 ::0 >-3 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 C (1 >-3 >-3 >-3 ::0 tXl 0 0 0 0 ::0 ::0 tXl tXl tXl > C C C C > ::0 I-" g H >-3 ..., >-3 ..., H tXl 1.0 t"' H t"' tv tXl tXl tXl tXl t"' t"' Z 1.0 0"\ tv 0"\ 0 >-3 ::0 t.1l 0 g ::0 >-3 0 tv \!l (1 :J: 0 0 -J -J CP 0"\ (1 H 0 I-" > > W tv I-" tv > >-3 :I>' Ul >-3 t"' 0 > CP 0"\ tv 0"\ >-3 :I: 0 :I>' H H H I t"' H 0 I t"' ;><: 0 G1 :I: tll 0 C :I: tll I Z :J: H tXl H ~ :I: ::I: Z >-3 H tXl >< >-3 G1 :3: <: > > 0 G1 :3: tXl Ul ::I: > >< ::0 >-3 g t"' ::I: :I>' > g ::0 ::0 >-3 > H g ::0 ::0 I > > t"' tXl 0 ::0 G1 > t"' Z >< tXl Z Z 0 :I: >< tXl "0 0 Ul >-3 t"' G1 (1 <: Ul G1 (1 > g ::0 0 H ::0 0 Z H > C t"' 0 > C >-3 0 Z t"' ::0 t:l Z :J: t'l >-3 t'l t'l >-3 0 >< G1 >< -~ C (1 :I>' (1 >-3 ::0 >-i ::0 0 tzl 0 G1 Ul Ul Ul > Ul Ul I-" :I>' ..., H tv W I-" > H W W \!l t:l t'l Z I-" 1.0 I-" .I::- 0 Z W 0 .I::- >-3 Ul G1 w I-" t11 -J 1.0 >-3 G1 Ul Ul {ft {ft {ft {ft {ft {ft {ft I-" {ft I-" I-" l-" I-" I-" CP 0 CP 0 0 0 0 0 t11 0 t.1l 0 0 0 0 0 , , , (1 , , , (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ul 0 0 0 0 0 Ul 0 0 0 >-i 0 0 0 0 0 >-3 7 " '~----j7. . I- /3 (' S 11..e' <?-,R.-<. V'-" c <I . / ' . // 1-0/7;;1 /~"J~. )"" COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5823 MEMORANDUM TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors .", FROM: David B. Benish, Chief of Community Development .])(~ DATE: January 13, 1992 RE: Response to Questions From Board Members Staff and VDOT are providing the following responses to questions submitted by Charlotte Humphris (a copy of the questions is attached). VDOT staff provided responses for questions 1 through 4, 6, 7 and 10. County staff provided responses to questions 5, 8, and 9. Rt. 708. discrepancy in "Previous Fundinq" between Planninq Commission (No.4) and VDOT lists: 1. The total revenue sharing funds for this project was $100,000. VDOT had received $8,000 of the revenue sharing. When VDOT prepared the priority list, the full $100,000 was shown, causing the total previous allocation to be $8,000 higher than the actual allocation. As of now, the full amount of the revenue sharing has been credited to this project and the current allocation is $150,000. Rt. 654. discrepancy in "Previous Funding" between Planning Commission (No.5) and VDOT lists: 2. This difference was caused by the same situation as above. That is to say in 1990-91 all revenue sharing funds for this project was shown as previous funding, but had not actually been billed and credited. Therefore, the previous total for previous funding was incorrect. There is $400,000 of revenue sharing which Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Page 2 January 14, 1992 has not been credited to this project. The current allocation on this project is $435,500 with a billing currently being processed which will make the total allocation $600,500. When the final revenue sharing funds have been credited, the total allocation will be $1,000,500. What is the process for funds to become unallocated or to be reallocated?: 3. When a project is completed and finishes with a balance or deficit, funds can only be transferred to other Albemarle County secondary projects to balance out the projects. This would include closing out deficits and providing additional funds for other projects. If an active project is changed in scope or deleted, the remaining funds are transferred to other projects. These transfers have to be approved the the District Administrator and the Central Office in Richmond. Rt. 708 (No. 4 on Planninq Commission list) Differences in Planning Commission and VDOT lists for "Estimated Cost" and "Previous Funding" amounts: 4.A. The difference in "Estimated Cost" was due to change in estimated cost of the project. The change was made between our meeting with the Planning Commission and the date the list was submitted to the Board of Supervisors. The difference in previous funding is the same as in Question 1, that is the previous funding shown on the Commission's priority included revenue sharing funds that had not actually been billed or credited. Rt. 654 (No. 5 on Planninq Commission list): 4.B. See Question No.2. Rt. 743 (Hydraulic Road--No. 12 on Planninq Commission list) : 4.C. The cost estimate was revised between the Planning commission and the Board meeting. The cost increase was due to the extension of the improvements at the intersection of Route 631 at the Rock Store. ~ Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Page 3 January 14, 1992 Rio Road (from Berkmar to Rt. 29 and from Berkmar to Rt. 743--Nos. 11 and 13 on Planninq Commission list): 4.D. The cost estimate was reduced because a portion of this project is to be constructed as part of the Rt. 29 improvements. Basis for change in advertisement date for Meadow Creek Parkway and City awareness of chanqe in date: 5. The change in the advertisement date is based on coordination with the financing of the City portion of this project. The change was made by VDOT based on the City's priority list for urban projects. It is now estimated for 1999 and is based on the anticipated timing for the City portion of the project. This revised EAD of 1/99 is generally consistent with the allocation of funds as outlined in the six Year Primary and Urban System Plan. The six Year Improvement Program for the Urban Highway System (FY91-92) includes the Meadow Creek Parkway from Preston Avenue to the North Corporate limits for engineering only, with the allocation of funds beginning in 1994-95 and extending through the remaining three years of the Plan. A total of $5.4 million is to be allocated to this project over that period. The estimated cost for engineering is $1.6 million. The city has proposed four improvement projects and the Parkway is currently the lowest priority of those four. The three other projects are scheduled for development over the next three years and use the bulk of the funds available for City projects. In order to advance development of the Parkway additional funds would be necessary or a reallocation of funds from the other City projects. The later would result in a delay of those projects. Although the City Council may not be aware of the current estimated advertisement date of 1/99, the Council should be aware that the construction of the Parkway would not occur until full funding is provided, and planning and right-of-way acquisition is completed. This is not anticipated until sometime after FY1996-97, the last year of the current six year Plan for the urban highway system. Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Page 4 January 14, 1992 Could more revenue sharinq funds be allocated to the Meadow Creek Parkway proiect in earlier years? 6. Revenue sharing funds must be expended in the fiscal year in which they are allocated. Therefore, they are usually assigned to projects that are anticipated to be completed that same year. Revenue sharing funds cannot accumulate over time for the future construction of a project. Differences in "Cost Estimates" and "Previous Fundinq" on Planninq commission and VDOT lists for Meadow Creek Parkway: 7. The $28,751,000 cost estimate was furnished by Albemarle County. This is for the proposed County alignment. The estimated cost is based on consultant studies and is the estimate used in the ClP. VDOT's estimate of $20,000,000 was taken from the CATS plan and updated to allow for inflation. VDOT has not allocated any funding to this project. The $116,000 previous funding indicated is solely County money for planning purposes (consultant contract). How does the Board of Supervisors deal with Rio Road/Route 250 Connector Road? 8. The Rio RoadjRt. 250 Connector Road is a recommendation of the CATS Study. There has been no study to determine the ultimate alignment of this road. As proposed in CATS, the alignment would traverse Pen Park and Rivanna Park and would have a significant impact on the use of these facilities. The ability to use federal funds could be limited due to the project's impact on the parks. The eligibility of this road for the use of secondary (or primary) funds has not been determined to date. This determination will have to be made by VDOT. Typically, to quality for secondary construction funds, a project would have to serve as a "replacement project" for the upgrading of an existing road. This is the situation with the segment of the Meadow Creek Parkway in the current six Year Plan. Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Page 5 January 14, 1992 If the County wishes to delete the project from the CATS Study, CATS would have to be amended. It is staff's understanding that an amendment would require approval by City Council, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, and the MPO Policy Board, and would have to be accepted by VDOT and Federal Highway Administration. Staff has requested the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission determine the exact process for amending CATS. . They will be providing that information to us later this week. Status of City actions on the Meadow Creek Parkway and how does the Board proceed in coordinating development of this proiect with the City? 9. Regarding the status of the portion of Meadow Creek Parkway from Preston Avenue to the Bypass, the City adopted a resolution August 6, 1990 on the Rt. 29 Bypass, which indicated that the Meadow Creek Parkway should be constructed from the Rt. 250 Bypass to U.S. 29 North as soon as funding is available (attached). The County Resolution states that "neither McIntire Road nor Ridge Street shall be widened because of the negative impacts on the City and its neighborhoods." A joint resolution now being considered by the County, City Council and University states the Meadow Creek Parkway should be constructed from the Rt. 250 Bypass to U.S. 29 North as soon as possible. In discussions with VDOT urban system staff, it appears that the City has never forwarded to VDOT a formal position on the Meadow Creek Parkway alignment and inclusion of McIntire Road in the project. The August 6, 1990 resolution, which includes comments regarding the McIntire Road section of the Parkway project, should be sufficient for VDOT to consider a change in the scope of project. The appropriate time for the City to request this change would be during the review of the Six Year Primary, Interstate, and Urban System Plan, which is undertaken in the spring of the year. . Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Page 6 January 14, 1992 Allocation of revenue sharing funds to the Meadow Creek Parkway: 10. Assignment of revenue sharing funds as shown on the worksheet was a preliminary estimate for funding purposes at this time. The total allocation would be the same with or without the assignment of revenue sharing funds to a particular project. DBB/jcw F. R. (Rick) Bowie Rivanna COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281 Charlolte Y. Humphris ,Jdek Jouett Edward H. Bain. Jr. Samuel Miller David P. Bowerman Charlottesville Walter F. Perkins White Hall Peter T. Way Scollsville January 8, 1992 V. Wayne Cilimberg Director of Planning & Community Development Albemarle County Office Building Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Wayne: I was to type up the questions I had about the "Six-Year Secondary Road Plan" which came to the supervisors in the December 4, 1991 memorandum from you. My questions reference the attachments to that memorandum. 1. From the Planning Commission priority list, Attachment 1: No.4 (Rt. 708) lists previous funding at $150,000. This was $158,000 in the 90-91 priority lists. Question: What happened to $8,000? 2. From the Planning Commission Priority List, Attachment 1: No.5 (Rt. 654 - Barracks Road) lists previous funding at $1,000,500. This was $1,128,000 in the 90-91 priority list. Question: What happened to $127,500? 3. What is the process for funds to become UNALLOCATED or to be REALLOCATED? 4. Why are there these differences in the Planning Commission and the VDOT "Estimated Cost" amounts and "Previous Funding" amounts? Estimated Cost Previous Funding A. Pl. Comm. Item 4 (Rt. 708) $ 400,000 $ 150,000 VDOT Attachment 3A (No.5) Rt. 708 342,300 65,000 V. Wayne Cilimberg January Ii, 1992 Page 2 B. Pl. Comm. No.5, Barracks Rd. 1,386,772 1,000,500 VDOT No.6, Barracks Rd. 1,386,770 435,500 C. P. Comm. No. 12, Hydraulic 743 2,000,000 185,000 VDOT No. 12, Hydraulic 743 2,500,000 185,000 D. Pl. Comm. Nos. 11 & 13, Rio 29 to Berkmar + Berkmar to 743 4,255,000 245,696 VDOT Nos. 11 & 13 (same as above) 3,750,000 245,696 5. VDOT No.7, Meadowcreek Pky. shows "ADV" date of 1-99. Last update said 7/97. Who made this change? Based upon what information? Is the City Council aware of this change? Does the City Council agree with it? 6. VDOT No.7. Meadowcreek Pky. South (Attachments 3A and 3B. with and without Revenue Sharing. Why could not more Revenue Sharing dollars be put into earlier years of the 6 year period, especially since this project is one of the top 4 specific projects on our priority list? 7. Pl. Comm. No. 17, Mdck. Pky. North $28,751,000 (Estim. Cost) $ 116,000 Prevo Funding) VDOT No. 16, Meadowcreek Pky. North $20,000,000 -0- Why these discrepancies? 8. How does the Board of Supervisors deal with the Rio Road/250 Connector in CATS - $8.2 million in our Secondary System.? V. Wayne Cilimberg January '0, 1992 Page 3 9. VDOT No.7, Attachment 3A, Meadowcreek Pky. - See * at bottom of page which says "Based on coordination with the city," Questions: How does the Board of Supervisors proceed? Does the county make a formal request to the City Council? Is the portion from Preston Ave. to the US 250 Bypass officially eliminated? This was still listed in the Urban 6- year program. 10. VDOT No.7, Attachment 3A, Meadowcreek Pky. Without Revenue Sharing, $3 million of state funds go into Meadowcreek Pky. in 1996-97 and 1997-98. On Attachment 3B, with Revenue Sharing, only $2.12 million of state funds are designated during this same time period. Also, $1 million of Revenue Sharing funds are put in for 1998-99, BUT $880,000 in state funds are taken out. WHY? Thank you for your help, Wayne, in helping to get answers or explanations for me. Sincerely, DI~~ Charlotte Y. Humphris pc: Board of Supervisors Robert W. Tucker, Jr. RE:SOLUTION WHEREAS! traffic congestion in the Route 29 North corridor is an :.ncz'easing problem and immE!diate improvements are needed to i~:_leviate lOt::lal traffic problems and to help move north-south through traffic; and WHEREAS! we are in agreement with Albemarle County and the University of Virginia that all base case i~?rovements including Meadowcreek Parkway to the 250 Bypass; construction of three grade !::eparated interchanges at Hydraulic I Greenbrier and Rio Roads; construction of additional access to the North Grounds of the University; and traffic reduction strategy including expanded transit service! park and ride requirements! bicycle lanes and some reduction of student cars should be ~ndertaken to address the Route 29 North traffic problem; and WHEREAS, clftE~r reviewing t.he DEIS 1 however, the City of Charlottesville: does not. bE!lieve these improveme:nts: alone handle all north-south traffic by the year 2010. We believe the limitations of this solution pointed out in the DEIS will be compounded by the recent. addit.ton of three traffic lights to the three mile stretch of road under study, and by the likelihood that population and traffic growth will exceed the projections contained in the study; and WHEREAS! the DEIS has identified available corridors to serve as a part of a Route 29 North network. We think it is critical that a corridor be designated and acquired as SOon as possible. If we delay these corridors will no longer be available and much of the State's investment in this study will be lost; THEREFORE, for these reasons, the City of Charlottesville requests that the Virginia Department of Transportation recommend and tht; Commom.;eal th Transportation Board adopt the following phased solution to traffic needs in the Route 29 North corridor: 1. Improvements to Route 29 North. The widening of Route 29 North to slx lal1'eS with' two continuous turn lanes is necessary and should begin as soon as possible. 2. Reservation of a Limited-Access Western Corridor. Using the data con'tained in the DEIS the St:ate S110uld designate and acquire a limited-access corridor west of Route 29 North that will have the least potential impact on the environment. -2- 3. Impro~ents to Rio R~, Hydraulic Ro~~ Georgetown Road and the Barracks Road/250 ~pass lntl~rsect~on. These roads should be widened to four lanes and the intersection should be upgraded to help reduce local traffic on Route 29 North. 4. Grade Separated Interchanges at HYdraulicL Greenbrier and lITo Road!:;. Diamon'd-shaped grade separated interchanges s]1OUld be constructed at thesle three intersections. 5. Additional Access to the North Grounds of the University of- V3~'3'inia. Ai1'a'7:fcUt:[Qnal exIt sholl1d ~ constructed off the 250 Bypass to provide access to the North Grounds of the University of Virginia. 6. Meado'i'~~ek Parkw,!y":" Heiidowcreek ParkWl:lY should be constructed as far as the 250 Bypass along with ether remaining base caBe improvE!ments as part of a comprehensive north-south road network. This would be a limited access parkway engineered for 45 m.p.h. and for passenger vehicles only. The road shall be signed to discourage through traffic from traveling through the center of Charlottesville. Neither MCIntire Road nor ~idge Street shall be widened because of the negative impacts on the City and its neighborhoods. 7. Limited-Access Western Corridor. western corridor~:hould be constructed as the Route 29 North corridor improvements. A limited-access the final step in Approved by Council August 6! 1990 ~~iI J-e' - w~ G ~~'~6 --- ~ RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Charlottesville, the County of Albemarle and the University of Virginia have reviewed the improvements proposed by _the Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) for the 29 North Corridor, AND WHEREAS, the City, County and University believe a unified and cooperative implementation agreement with the CTB and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDoT) is necessary to provide for these improvements in an expeditious and efficient manner, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City, County and University jointly support and request that the CTB and VDoT implement improvements to the 29 North Corridor in the following sequence: o Widen Route 29 North as provided for in 1985 Charlottesville Area Transportation Study; o Design the North Grounds connector road facility; o Address each element of CTB Phase I recommendation of November 15, 1990; , o Construct the Meadowcreek Parkway from the Route 250 By-pass to U.S. 29 North as soon as funding is available; o Construct grade-separated interchanges on U.S. 29 North at Hydraulic Road (Rt. 743), Greenbrier Drive (Rt. 866) and Rio Road (Rt. 631) with early acquisition of right-of-way for these interchanges based upon hardship (same program being used for early acquisition for Alternative 10 - Western alignment); o Construct an alternate controlled vehicle access for traffic bound for University areas only, including the north grounds from Route 29/250 By-Pass; o Complete remainder of CTB Phase II recommendation of November 15, 1990; and o Construct Alternative 10 after completion of the above and when traffic on Route 29 is unacceptable and economic conditions permit, concurrent with remainder of 1985 Charlottesville Area Transportation Study. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the Virginia Secretary of Transportation, the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), requesting the MPO to amend the Charlottesville Area Transportation Study to reflect this resolution's priorities. F. R. Bowie, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Alvin Edwards, Mayor City of Charlottesville John T. Casteen, President University of Virginia Date: Date: Date: RWT,Jr/dbm 91. l84 W > I- <C -' -' ::><C ::EI- ::>0 U I- -' <C 2 OCl 2 I- o o 2 0::> <cu. VI 13~ >0 W 2 ""::> I:>. u. -' <CI- I- VI 00 I- U ~ ,.... o <C W '-' ...... VI ::> I- <C I- VI 2 o l- I:>. "" U VI W o 2 00 l- I- ...... 5~ 0"" -' u. ,.. W ::E <C 2 o 2 W o I- ~13 "" "" t- Z w ::E :I: o e( l- I- e( 2 o VI VI - ::EI- ~~ U -' CI>- 2 I- 2 "" 20 <C -' "" I:>. I:>. 1"11"1 OONN_,..,,.., 00r-.r-.0"'''' OOOONN...o .... OO..........""'ao-. OOOO-o-o"'ClOClO 0" 0'" ~ :: ~ c:. ~ -.. ,..,.. 0...0 .. .. ... .. .......- ...o\Q-NNr-.-CO__ o 0 N o 0 1"1 o OONOo-o-O 00 ...O,........N...O OOOONOI"lr-.O .. 00 .. .. in .. r-... .. g O' N. ::;:: C8 ~. ~ ClO. cg ...o...o_NI"")I.I'\,..,NN 000 000 0"'0 000 "'00 ~Or-. . ~ ClO~O OI"lOClO NNOo- .. .. ...N ClO~~ ~ ~ ::ne 1"1 ...."N" o NOr-.-o o gOl:::g~-oOClO 00...0.........00. 0...8 g 0...(8 ~ ro ~ a..N.. o .NOI"I~~-oO-o 00...0........1.1'\,..... ...o...o--..:t-oO_Ln...ott'l ,.... ,.... 1"1 N 0- 0- ...... ...... "'-0 '-' '-' 1"Ir-. 1"11"1 "'ClO ~ 1"1 o ~ N N 1"1 r-.' ~ ~ o ~ 00 01"1 "'0- ~ 0 ClOO . ~ ~ o -0 o 0- 0-0 ~'" CIO~ ~ N r-.~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,..,------------- ClOClOClOClOClOClOClOClOClOClOClOClOClOClO .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... co"'O----"'O-C8~---- ~~~~r;;I:::~~"':o~~!2~ ,," co'" ........ r:tJ" 0.... 0'" or- ttl" ".... ""," ...:t-" Ll'\" Ll'\ Ll'\'" --...;t-4"...;tLl'\LI'\Ll'\LnLl"\1/'\LnLl'\Ll'\ o r-.o r-.o 0- . o .", or-.I"I OClO-o '" . ClO 1"1 ~ N OClO o ~ 0 01"10 .0 ~ 0: ...0'" ~ ~ 000 000 000 00", 00 N "'N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 000 "'000000 0 000 NOOOOOO 0 0000,.., ..00000000000 .. .. ..0 .....- .. ... .. .. ..00 "000 g~g~~~ggg~~~~~~~~ ONNO,.., "'OI.l'\N-MlI'\OOOOO .. .. "'N ...co .. .. .. .. ...or- 0 ..00 Ll'\ N...:t'---N-____,..,__Ln...:t'_ CI 2 ,.... ,.... ""0,.., - o..Zo..-Ln ......::>......1"10- "'u.r-.o-...... --......, ""'........,..... o:~""' 'C......, ;;:;j::::CI ~ '-' 2 '-' W I- o 5!CICI 2 2 OXWW o u. ,.... ,.... ~ '" 0-0- ;;;j:::: '-' '-' >- CI CI CI -..J Z Z Z -.J UJ W w <C ::> >->->- :z D::: D::: D::: 2 <C<C<C CI<CCl222 2 2 ::E I- CI U 2 W W.., o >- "" "" I:>. <C 2 I- i-'::E::E::Eg~ :a:a W > ...J -I -.J...J -I ...J...J WQOLIJt-WWWI-WW ~o!D:::g:ig:g:g:~&:g: CI CI >- 220 WW::> I- >- >- VI "" "" <C<CI- 2 2 2 ::E<C I- ::E-' ::> VI 2 o U o OWO ClOCl , 2 . 2 ::> 2 0u.0 ::E::E -' -' W W "" "" I:>. I:>. CI 2 >- o "" W "" W W VI u. I- VI I- 2 "" W I:>. I:>. 0 W WVI>- VI<C"" <C::J:<C ::J: I:>. 2 I:>. "" 2 2 00 ."" o W <C> 00 "" "" "" CIao 30-,.., w""<C<C 2al::E::E >->- "" "" ci;:i;:i "" W W > o "" I:>. ::E 2 o o 0 ~~ "" "" :a:a W W 2 2 o l- X W wzzz >000 o D::: ..... I- ..... c.. u u u ::E::>::>::> "" "" "" I- I- I- ::z: en (/) en 0222 000 I-UUU U W W W W D::: D::: l:t:: VI "" "" "" "" WOOO t- .., .., ..., 2<C<C<C ::E::E::E o W I:>. o -' W > W o CI 2 W al VI 2 <C -' I:>. o "" 00 00 00 o' 0 o '" ~ ~ 2 2 o U o '" N CJ.....t-t-t-.......1-1- zzz:zzo:zz to- WWWW-4'WW UX::E::E::E::EN::E::E w wwwwu..ww ci~~~~~O~~ 0::: 0::: D::: D::: II:::t: 0::: 0::: OI:>.WI:>.I:>.I:>.I:>.UI:>.I:>. ~w~::E~::E::El}j::E::E "" CI "" cCJ.................... t-t- ~""I-~~~~13~~ zt:OC((/)(/)(/)(/)U')cnVJ >- W "" W o "" 0 i~3 ~ >-2>-1"1 1-01-'-0 21-2....... 13~B:g U::::t:u""" :z 0::: 0 U) ~ al ~ ~ ~ t- CJ Cll::: 0 c.. W ...... 1"1 ""~ >- ~ ~ ~O 0"" m 0 000::: ~Cll::: 'Cll::: Cll::: 0 NW W <<_0::: wo ~ ,...... CI""VI W::E~<CU.O N ""<C ~VlI-~~~~O~~""~~~~~~ ::E.......<eowcnQ:::J:........:zu..\QNN"'O ""1"1 ::EalalWI-~WO........................2W 8~::;::~~~al~~~ ~ocg~~~ %_NUN~3Zc..CJZ~~"ON<u.. wz w:z:zz >0 >000 VIa WVI 0 ......et:::t-ClZt-t-D::t-t-t- uc..uc<(UUQ..UUU w::E::> ::E::>::>::E::>::>::> .., 0:::0:::0:::0:::0::: Cll:::Cl:::Cl:: ~~~ztnC08~tn:ztntntn CJt-c..oz %zzo:z:zz I- 0 00 000 VI<CXI-U UUI-UUU I- ..~ uw wwuwwwou :E~O:: Cll:::OI::~O::Cll:::a=:g~ 1-0:::0::: O:::O:::Cll:::Cll:::O:::CX 2WO WOOO W <Ct-. 1-..,..,-,3t- -'2<C 2<C<C<CW2 I:>. ::E ::E::E::E2 O~ ~-o 00 I- I- -' -' UU :a 2 >- :a I:>. "" VI U ~ ~~ ""0 "" <C <Cw al::E 2 o U >-0 :a"" ~ ""1:>.2 i= U UJ~~ :a -' "" """"I- >-2 ::> <C alUW ::::1:>0 < :E:~:Z CJ I- ::E "" ~OWO"" ::-=:z~O~O~~~~fi3 - uo::::z:o:::mt-CJ:ECJ I- VI '" N -0 ~~~r::;;:;~ r-.-o-o-o-o-o ~I"I~ !2~!2 >-1- >"" o I:>. 0"" -' O<C \0.-'-0-0.- $C8!2~~:ti$ -0 ON ""r-. ~ I- "" ""<C I:>. N VI 0 01"1 ::E I- ~<C N j:: ...... ......VI '" 0-0- 2r-.N CI 2 I- 2 UX -IW W >0 Q. ..., et::: U) 0:: <C O""::J:I-<C CI"""" UI-CI OI:>.W<CO VII- 00U2 2UW<CUVI d'.. UJ c.." ~ W ::EZCCJc.:J11Cl:::1Cl:: ""2 <C<CI- <C0""I-I-W2 -'UI:Xlc((I)Z ~~;;:;ce~a; -o-o-or-.-or-. 8 <C "" 0 <C o :z::zo::o- ~~VI~ >-UVI -' wu. ouo o"'u I-N<C ...... "" >-~""w t-er:::c:(t- <CW2 U I:>. 2 o I- "" t:UJ in 2 ::> VI ~" ~al ""::E <C<C I:>. -' r-.O ~CQ ~NI"I~"'-or-.ClOo- O~NI"I~",-or-.~o-O~NI"I~"'-or-.ClOo-O~ --------- NNNNNNNNNN~~ ~ ~ ClO . ~ 1"1 ~ -0 '" o o o o '" 1"1 o o o o '" 1"1 W I- <C o I- 2 W ::EI:>. W VI I-U ox W VI > 0>- <CI- 2 fi:lB I- U <C ::E2 o I- VlO W W , VI O<C <Cal W ~ ~ ~ w > .... < -' -' ::l< :E.... ::l0 U.... ~~~~~~~~~ Ciiaia;cocococococo ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..0..0..0---......__ ~~~~~~:8~~ tol)" ,....,... 1'0-" r:IJ'" CIJ" t:IJ" CIJ" 0.... 0." LnLnLl'\I.I'\Ll\Ll\Lf\LnLn ~ eo , ~ o ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ eoeoeoeo&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& ~i~~NNN~~~~~N~~~~~~ ~N~~~~~N~$~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~OO~~NN -0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0,...,...,...,...,...,... ~ -' < 0 0 Z 0 CO 0 Cl 0 0 ~ Z 0 -0' .... 00 0 '0 ,... 0 Z In 0 ~ 0 ::l N , < u.. In ~ ~ VI B Cl z 0 :; N 0 CO w z '" ::l ~ 0.. u.. -' <.... .... VI 00 .... U z 00 .... .... ... 5~ 00:: -' u.. o 0 o 0 000000000 0 o ...0000000 000000000>-0 ..0 .. .. .. .. ... .. ..0....... 1n00lnOOOOO::lCO N ..ONOOc)LnO~ Ln-",,-..:t--f'rI'\-Ncn-..:t VI ::l .... < .... VI z o .... 0.. '" U VI W o .... Z W ..... ..... I- :EUUU WWWW >~.,..., 0000 '" 0:: 0:: 0:: 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. :E w w >> 00 0:: 0:: 0.. 0.. :E:E o o o 000000000000000 0000 '00000000000000 0000000000000000000 "0001.1'\ .. .. .. ... ... .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... o .... ..NOOC)I/'\OOOI.l'\LI'\C)OOOO OLt\LI'\LI'\ .....:tLnLnNO..-ONNOLnONO ~COCOCO~~~~In~N~""In~~""NCO ClClClCl Zz::z:Z w w 00 WWW<< ClClClO::O:: I-OCC<.::J<.::J o 0.. 0:: 0:: 0:: VI al al al cccwwww (!j(!j(!j!ii!!ii!!ii!!ii! c.:::: c.:::: a: 0::: a::: ac:: c.:::: Cl Cl Cl Cl XXXX 000000000000000 ~~~~(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j(!j CIl:::c.::::c.::::c.::::er::::a:iOI::Dl::a:o:::o:::c.::::a:c.::::o::: 000000000000000 WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0.. Z:Z:Z:Z:ZZZZ:z:z:z:z:z:zZ ::l::l::l::l::l::l::l::l::l::l::l::l::l::l::l ........0 <<VI :Z:Z:Z www..........t-t- ZZZ<<<< .... .... u.. o 0:: 0.. z CO-o ~~ .... W VI .... Z VI ::l VI ::I: ... .... W u.. Z Cl Z Cl Z .... Z wzz :EOO w _ >........ OUU '" w W 0.. VI VI :EO::'" w w .... .... Z Z x X 0:: 0:: 0:: '" z ........::l 0:: 0:: 0:: VI VI VI al o U < ..., ca ~~ ... ... N N N N CiCi .... LL ..... CIl::: t- O'" "':E w VI:Z z VI"" u.. .... ce........w:::E::E:E::E ....ZN "'0 ::zOON.......CO"'OO....... O>O::ONNOlnO u..c(U NN WNN $~ ... ... ~~ N N Z -0::0:: ~ O::::::IE:::IE: ~ NO:: ....... c.::: V) (/) In ...... o ............,...0 NC8:Z:Z: N N CO t-O:~ "'-0 ,... ~ -0 VI ...J U -' U < Z Z ~ N::l ~!8~ , - ... ... ... '" -0 Rl~~ W Z W COw ~~ ~~~-og~ ... N ... ... Ll'\r--o.O :g;O-~la ...J U < VI W 0 . N o -0 ... ... '" '" ~~ -0,... '" ~ ~CO 0:: 0 .... .... U u.. W 0 W ..... Z (!j :E 0 z < 0:: 0 0:: Z 0.. U 0 Z 0 CO ~~O In N ~ N N In ~ ~ N 0 N 0 N ~ 0 ,... ~ ~ CO ~ In ,...,... In -0 W 0 ~~~ N 0 ;:! N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ In 0 0 :g~ ~ 0 .... ,... -0 -0 -0 -0 ... ,... -0 ~ -0 ,... ,... -0 -0 -0 B 0 ~ ~ '" N Z 0 VI VI :E .... ~ VI N ~ ~ In -0 ,... CO ~ 0 ~ N ~ ~ In -0 ,... CO ~ 0 ~ N ~ ~ In -0 ,... CO ~ 0 ~ N U -' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ In In In In In In In In In In -0 -0 Cl >- z .... Z 0:: Z 0 < - ...J 0:: 0.. 0.. n. ...--- - - - , ~ ~ ~~ S:\' I <( .. '1~ (I') ~ ~ ~ , I- ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ w ~ !t ~ ~ ,~ .~ ::I: ':\.. ~ ~ () , ~ ~ <( ~ ~ I- ~ ~ ~ I- ~ ~ <( ~LlJ \) (J a \) 'J '0 I\) CJ ~ ~ CJ () CJ (J '0 \) \) ~ ~~ '" ~ \) ~ ~ "" ' ~~ ~ ~ '" ~~ '"', N ~ ~ ~ ~ '" a @ ~ ~ Cl ~ '-9 ~ ~ '" I f'... ~' ~ '" ~ ~ '\J' ~' ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ '\ () ~ ~ "'- ~ - - -.- f'... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B ~ 0 t:;J <:\ K; ~ ~ ~, s::; :<::J' ~ r- (j' Sj' ~' ~ I.f\ <:() . I;}j l\S '+ ~ ~ " , '- '"', ...... " ,"" ",N I- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lY') 1'<'\ ~ '-S "" ~ t'<o ~ ~ (J' ~ ~ - ~ "- '" " " '"' "'~ ~ ~ <:\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" ::t- ~' ~ ~' ~ ~' ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \r) ~ ~ ~ '" :s:: rZ. " " .....\'\J -- - - - C:t~Sh ::t- ~ ~ ~ "" ~ \'.. ~L;J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "l- t:(~~ l\i ~ ~ t--. ~ '\)' \;}' ~ ~ :\.)' ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" ~ " " ~ "'-.I' ~~1Jj "'" ,lil~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I!\ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~' ~' ~ ~' ~ ~', ~ ~ lri "'" "- \ ~ ~ " " ~ ~ '" ~ '" ~ ,(J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ \J ~ ~ ~ 'I::l. ~ ~ ~ ~~ % ~ ~ ~ ~ t:5~ ~ \i'\ "'S '\S ~ ~ ~ ~ (j B' ~ ~ ~ 1\.,,' ~ i:::S:l \j' \ri I:\: ~ ~ ~ ~ "" \9' ~ ~' ~ ~ ,;::::: ~ ~ \) " ~ ~ ~ "<) ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ \i\ \\:) ~ ~ " "l: "-: "'l \i ~ '-, ~ '!'1 \) \) ~ \J ~ % ~ ~ \:) ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I:: ~~ \) ~() \\J "'5 ~ ~ \) ~ ~ I\) 4'< ~' ~ :( s:~ ~' Y\ ~ s;\ ~ :\J' ~ l' ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ I\;) \9 '\:) '\l\ ~~ t\.J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. '- "- C l\) \{) I\J' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \n h;: \'.. \3 ~ .~) ~~ ~ ~ '\S 11() ~ " ~ ~ ~~ ~ \)' ~ ~ 'S::l' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~' <;J' ~' ~ ~ \S ~. ~L,j \9 ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ Il\ ~ ~ .~ ) \Q ~ I',) 0 ~ ~ "r) ',~ Ll.,j " .~ " ~, \9 ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I\l ~ ~ i:{~ ~\r., "'l- ~Ir) ~ i ~ I ~ ~ ~ t\J "'0\ \J\~ "'~ ~ ~Q-, ~ I 1 1 \ " 1;\ I "- ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\ ~~ t-,,' )j ~ "-- , ~ ,,'" ~ "- "- v ~'<1 '-- ~ ~ ~ l\.i ~ ~ ,\, I'r) ~ I'Y) t\v ~ ~ "- ~ "- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~~ ~ c; ~ \) ;:)' Y\ ~ \j ~ Iv .~ " 'f \J \..; \) .'>( \J ~ ~ " \" ''l.J ~ ~ ~ ~ r i'u ~ ~- ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~: \'0; '\l ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ \\J ~ I; J ~ u~ , ~~ ~ ~ I\J \) ~~ "" ~ '~ ~ ~ " \!~ " ~~ I\.i 3 ~ I\l ~ \ " ~ , ~ " ~ ~ , I\J ~~ N ~ ~ 'l-.J ~ ~ --.. ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ {t\J \:l ~ % ~ ..e, ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ I.l ~~ ,~ ~ <l\ \S ~ 'V ~ ~~ ~ ~ '\::) ~ ~ ~ 'IS ~ ~\ K: ~ \.. ~ I\)~ ~\.. ~ ~ I C' '" 't ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1:1"- ~ ~ ~ '1\\ ~ ~ ~ '\J'\ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \!l ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~\t '\ \) ~\S \) ~ \j ~ \J ~ - - ~ 4\ ~ ~ ~ ~ "- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ I l\) \ \ ~ ~ ~ \U ~ ~ ~ ~ \9 ~ ~ ~ \~ ~ '\j K ~ ~ ~ --: " ~ "J I'cj \Yj ~ \{) ~ t:--.... ~ ~ '\) 0\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t[ ~: ' , ~.. \) Il\ ". ~,": *:::,. m M ~ Z w ::2: J: () < ~ ~ < ,- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~'-..j "S ~ I f'-... ~ '- - f'-... ~ ~ ~ - ~ 0, ~ ""-' <J \) () () ~ ~, ~ '\ ~ ~ ~, ~' ~ '" ~ ~ 'S-J' ~ ~ '\S S::i " k:!, ~\ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ S0' 'J l:t) ~ ~ ~' $: K. ~ ~~ Sh 1-- ~~stj g; ~ ~ ~~ ~ \~ ~ % N ~ Sr1 ~ S0' ,"'~~ ~ " " ~~"t) I ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ lfi " ~ " "-.y ~ i \) \j (~) ~ \j ~ """ '--' ~ & ~ ~ ~ \3 ~ ~ ~ <::s ~, ~' ~ "'\)~ "'. ~~ l::i~ i::::~ ,-?i; ~~ ~ <:::, ~ ~ \;\ \9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~' '!1 ~ ~~ :;;:~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' '\ <J\ ~' " '\) \ ~ ~ 0\ , >c; 0\ r\:' I 'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v) C) '" ,~Iu()'ua ~ ,~~~~~ ~ ~:\ " '\ ~~~~~ ~ "'I ~~ ~~ ~ \)~\)\)~ \l\ ~ ~ .~ '" \) ~ ~ ~ \& ~ " ~ 1 ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ q8 IU Cl ~ 8' ~\) ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ <;) ~ ~ ~r \\j I- \) IS ~ ~ " l~ ~' r:\ ~ ~ B ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ '0) ~ ~' '" ~ \0 \\) ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ S:) f.:: l-J 'S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ K ~' ~ ,_ "::i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ') ~ '\ . I\j " ~ ~ ~ '\S' ~ &2 ~ \J ~ ~ ~ l.<: \r) 0'\ t ~ ~I -:. 'r {l- '-- \\j \'I) \'ij I"rJ \l I\. ~~~~~\l. ~ \} ~ v, ~ ~ ~ \9 ~ '\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\\l\~ ~ Q\ "\ \ \[) \ ,," '" :5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~~, ~ '\: ~ t>: ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :<:<:'l~ ~ ~\)") ~ 1,)6 ~\;)\<J Ii) ")\)$jB'<J\J'U~ ~ $ ~ ~ llJ ~ Ii) \) ~ \i ~ 10 \) \)' ~ ~' ~ % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ % \;j\S~~~'\:}$)$;;\S,\\9 ~" ~"~<l ~~ ~~I\i'Y ~\lj ~~ ~~ ~~ ~"1 \il;\J- ~'1J} ~ I\i \J \J\j $::l~ \) ~\\'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :\J' ~,.~' ~' ~ ,~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \\i'< ~ '" ~ :t ~~~ \J\ '\:l- ~ 't, v, v,, I Il\ G'\ ~ ,,~ '~ t~ '" \J ~ ~ ' ~ ') '<..:.. ~ ", '"' l\j I\l " ~ " ""- ~~ ~;c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \j~\)~~t'\\i~ \J\\).\; \J \J ~ ~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ (j '" <:>-,- ~ ~ ,,~~ ~ Vi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \\) ~ "<. ~ " ~ 'C\j '~~ I) \ , Y '< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '- r<v t'\J ''J ~ ~ \}, \J ~ ~ It; ~ ~ SS I: % ~ ~ ~ ~ \S , \\j ~ ~ }l r~ ~ ~ ~ \~ '-L 1 ~ I ~ I ~ \i~\W~~ ~<0~() ~ II) :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\) \j\J\j ~ ~' l.'-.) ~ ..~ ._", ~ ~ ~ ';:j:. ~ ~ ~ "r) '\) ~ ~ ~ \'i SS "<. L~ <::s t\.' ~'\ 1\1' .,\l ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~~~~~ I ~ \s) '" " " " ~ ',,- ~ ~ ~. \2' ~ ~ ~>:~ \S 00 \9 '<'; \J \J~\) ~'\:\; ~ ~ "- N ?<:i ~\)'" "- '\} tJ ~'\\)~~~'^'''Z: ~ l\1 .'<J \)" ".,"'\. ",:' \ ''J \ ~ \J t\, ~,,\ ~ I ~ r<v ,t\J \\.) SS" ,,~\l~~~\)\..:';J ~ ~~~~~,~r\)'\)"l'\S "'- ~'t;\ ~~~ \~ I .~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ \0~\J ~ ~ ~ ~ I \ ~ "Q ~ ~ ~ll) ~ ~ ~ \9 ~ \;j \3 \"- l:"- ~ ,t)A lu ~ !::i lu1 ~.~ ~\" ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ sS~~' ~ '" ~ 'Z ' ~ t,~ ~ ~ -\: (" ~ t::( ~~ ~ ,I( ':~\: =' ~ ill r:,: ~ ,,~() \f l\\ ~~ ~'~ ~\j~ ~ ~~~~~~\:)~~ ~% ~~~~~E ~ ~ ~, ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' .~ ~, ~, ~ ~ \"\ :'\ \. ~ l'1) ~ ~ b I\-) ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ & ~ ''<J \\} \l- ~ ~' ''I ') (\) ~ 'J "'\, ~ ~, ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I\J ~ ~'< ~ ~ ~ ') ~ ~ \f- ~ Nl' ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _,._ n_~,~ ~ ~ " <;J ~ ~ ~ \g ~ ~ ~ "'\,:. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ('\, ~ "<.' ~ ~ '\) ~ ~~~~~~~ ~\s~~ ~~\9 ~~~ ~::::: ~ ~ ...._ n__._ _.__,_ __..----! ~ ~ ~ \:J 'XJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. 1\ r\ ~ '" '\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Il: ~ ~ \J ~ \:\ ~ ~ I\j \J " ~\) ~ ~ ~~' ~ If) \~ ~'~ ~~ ~ ~ '\:; ~ \) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \\ '\" "- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ s=\ ~ ~' ;;':i ,~ ~~~~~ ~~&~ ~~~~ \\) ~ " ~ "S 'J '-' ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ 1\\ I\l ~ "J " ~ " 'K C) ... '" .. ('..., ~ Q- <J'- = ",,- , "" .:'. '" ... -....I) ,'" r-. ~-:, r- """ : vr " "" o o (Y\ , '-0 '. . ~ \J " ~-.. V'. "0 " \.{"'\ ;:'. ('0-. , ~.'" ~- . 4- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ,~ ~' ~ .~ ~' ~ f'\. ~ ~ ~ \} ~ " ,-~ ,,'SJ --. ~ \l ~ r- '<;j- r-- " O"'-.~ . . \ro 1'...)....:; : .... .. ~ t<J iii' ~ v. "<1- . C' . V' ~' ",,". "" ' ~ ~' .\;S \\ " '0 ~ ~ '\S ~' S::I' ~ ~ "" \J \J \J ~ \:J ~ "::i ~ ...~ ~ ~ 'S~ \j~~~ % ~' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~~I\\~~ ~""" " 'II( *\\ '"'<.'JI,- ';( ':l<. ~\A ~ ',< ~\" ~ C"\ -\ ~, ~ Ot, VI Il-.. C\" "" \\. I ,~ ~ "" \ ~ ~tK "<. "'\ ~ ~ \j ~ " ~ ~ I \J~ ~'N ~~~~~ ~ ~ , \1 ;-.: ~~",,~l'\. ~ ~.~ '\J ~ G 0\". ~ ~ ~ ~ t:: ~, ~ ...... \?) ~ ~ ~ ~ \S ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ll..J ~~ ~~ ~~ \Xl ~ r-l ~ "- r--... ~ ~ S!j ~ 0, ~ "'" o () () <) \) ~ ~ l\.: ~ '\\ lri ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ - %~\;)~ ~ <;l~%~ ~ ~ .~. ~'~ "- ~ ~ ~ N ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ "'"' ~ t'r) ~ I.... N Q, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \~, \J ~ ~ ,,\ V) ~~ ~ 'f'Y)~ ~ r-!.... "'" ~ ~ --- - ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ....... ......... ' '\J ""\ ~ ~ th ~. l\: ll::~~ fS ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ -....; ~ -....; I\l ~ 'Nl \f) ~ ~ '" \'..... ~ ~",I)\ \J'\ ~ G\ ~ <l'\ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~~~~~<~ ~ ~~ t-J ~ '11~ , ~ ' SS~~ " N~~ ~ ~~~%~r\ \ ~~1, ~t-I\~ '^ ~ "~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 \j '1 ~~~Ni?::.~~~ ~ "'~~~~~& m ___~_ _q ~__~ _~_ ~ _ ~1L-~__ ~ \) ~ ~ ~ ) ~ ~" ~ '::S: ~ \3 \-'--" '" ~~ t:;j~ ~~ .....;;::: ~~ ~ l,t.., ~~ ~~ It.,~ ~~ ~ \r) ~ ~ ~'~~~~~~ ~~;\:\ \J~"0~ ,,~~~~~I\) '\.., ~ \,) ~ ~ (j c:; ~ () ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;;I.-J "" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I.\.j '" . ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "-l ...... ...... !\l " t"- ~ ',J. ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ \(\ ~ \2) '" ~ ~ . I, ." ~,::-> ~ i() e~Q,:tAd 2jl"1t1Z (} /i, () ;~ N . / J <." f t " COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5823 February 19, 1992 Wendell Wood P. O. Box 5548 Charlottesville, VA 29905 RE: CPA-92-01 Piney Mountain Dear Mr. Wood: The Albemarle county Planning Commission, at its meeting on February 18, 1992, by a vote of 5-2, deferred the above-noted request for no more than six months (August 18, 1992). In conjunction with this deferral the Planning Commission, by a vote of 5-2, passed the following resolution supporting, in concept, the industry as they understand it: a. Based on the characteristics, limited as they are, currently available (size and function), unqualified support to this unidentified industry is pledged; b. This support is subject to change or withdrawal with any modifications, unacceptable to the Board, of these currently identified characteristics; c. Contingent upon continuation of the above support, and with complete identification of function and operation, and application for development within a period, not exceeding six (6) months from this approval, appropriate modifications, supporting this industry, will be made to applicable documents and regulations, controlling approximately 100 acres, contingent to Rt. 29 and across from the G. E. Fanuc operation. Please be advised that CPA-92-01 is scheduled for public hearing by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors at their meeting on February 19. 1992. J . . Wendell Wood Page 2 February 19, 1992 If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~ David B. Benish Chief of Community Development DBB/jcw cc: Lettie E. Neher Bob Brandenburger n,' n , . -. ..... STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: DAVII' BENISH FEBRUARY 18, 1992 FEBRUARY 19, 1992 r ,I " ',"",. ,. """ --~ "' '.. .,....... CPA-92-01 EXPANSION OF PINEY MOUNTAIN FOR INDUSTRIAL SERVICE LAND USE Request: The Board of supervisors has d~rected staff to evaluate an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to designate approximately 100 acres for industrial service use east of Route 29N adjacent to the Village of Piney Mountain (see Map 1) . Study Description: This report evaluates need for expansion of the growth areas for industrial use, the appropriateness of the proposed site for industrial uses, and the specific impact of the proposed industry in terms of land use employment and spin-off development activity. The information provided in this report focuses on the following: I. Background information on (a) the proposed industry, and (b) the current Board policy on Comprehensive Plan amendments in the Hollymead area. II. Adequacy of the existing areas designated in the Plan to accommodate industrial uses requiring large areas for building/site development. III. The appropriateness of an expanded industrial service land use designation in terms of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. IV. The suitability of the proposed site for an industrial service land use designation. V. Specific impacts of this industry or other industrial uses in terms of land use additional land use needs, economic/development impact and compatibility with County development standards. VI. Summary and Staff recommendations. I . BACKGROUND A. Proposed Industry - The consideration of this amendment is based on the interest of a major industrial company in locating on the .proposed site (see Map 1). At this time there is only general information available on this industry. The industry is considering other 1 Distributed to Board: ~-14-q~: " Agenda Item No. c}1, 69-/9 . /1 G AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 - CPA-92-01 - PINEY MOUNTAIN - TO BE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION ON FEBRAURY 18, 1992 <- locations both within Virginia and in other states. Detailed information will not be provided until the company has further reduced their list of possible sites. The name of the company and the specific research, development and production activities to be conducted on-site are not known. It has been identified as a division of a "Fortune 50" high technology, electronics related industry concentrating in research, development and production of "emerging technologies". Its operation and labor force characteristics are apparently similar to several existing businesses in the County, including General Electric, Sperry, and Comdial. It will employ approximately 700 people. A general breakdown of employment is 300 research/development and management, 300 technically based manufacturing, and 100 support staff. No information has been provided on the hours of operation, products developed at the site or types of shipment to and from the site. The company's site requirements include a 75 to 100 acre parcel. A one million square foot one-story building would eventually be constructed on-site. The initial phase of development would be smaller (approximately 150,000 square feet). This ultimate building would ,require an area of approximately 23 acres plus parking and residual developed area. The property owner has indicated that there are no "unique" requirements for water and sewer service. Some level of water use is required in their production process. The water would be recycled and reused. The predominate use of water would be for domestic purposes. However, no specific information concerning utility needs have been provided by the company. B. Board's Current Policy on Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Based on a Board of Supervisors directive at the time of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the Hollymead Community was evaluated in 1989 for possible expansion. It was determined that expansion of Hollymead was not appropriate at that time due to a number of outstanding issues or additional planning work that needed to be resolved or completed. These issues/activities include: 1. Development of a Community Facilities .Plan; 2. Development of a County Open Space Plan; 3. Development of a fiscal impact model and analysis of the County to determine impact of growth on the County; 4. Resolution of the Route 29 Bypass location; 5. Resolution of the Meadow Creek Parkway. 2 .--- -., " With the exception of the fiscal impact model/analysis, all other items have either been addressed or are under study this fiscal year. In December, 1991 the Board endorsed the recommendations of the Annual Report of the Comprehensive Plan. This report included a recommendation that "upon completion of the fiscal impact analysis, the staff should evaluate growth area expansion to accommodate land use needs. Various locations for growth area expansion should be considered, but particular emphasis should be given to re-evaluating the Hollymead Community/Piney Mountain Village area for expansion potential." Two major requests made in 1989 to expand Hollymead were deferred by the applicants. Both requests included proposals for industrial and/or commercial office land use. Both areas could also be considered candidate sites for growth area expansion and industrial land use designations. Staff has consistently recommended a comprehensive approach to evaluating potential expansion areas to ensure that the most appropriate expansion areas and land uses designations are established. II. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING INDUSTRIAL SERVICE AREAS There are a total of 1096 acres designated for industrial service use in the Comprehensive Plan. This is approximately four times the area anticipated to be needed during the next twenty years. To provide flexibility in the location of industrial and commercial land, the land use plan attempts to designate at least two times the estimated land use needs for non-residential uses. Therefore, there exists adequate total area designated in the Plan to support anticipated industrial development'. The large building site required for the prospeytive industry calls into question whether the available areas are suitable for this scale of development. Therefore, staff has evaluated the suitability of all the existing industrial areas to determine whether there are site$ that could accommodate this scale of development. The evaluation was based on topography, soil characteristics, other major environmental constraints and size and ownership of parcels. Two areas were found of 100+ acres, with slopes generally not exceeding 10 percent, and void of major environmental constraints. Both sites are within the Hollymead growth area and ACSA jurisdictibnal area for water and sewer service. 3 The first site, consisting of approximately 110 acres, is located just north of Airport Road and west of Airport Acres subdivision. Access could be provided from Airport Road or possibly Route 29. This site has several constraints. The suitable area consists of several different parcels under separate ownership. Also, while within the jurisdictional areas for utility service, there is limited sewer capacity available at the Camelot Treatment Plant to serve this area. The second site is of approximately 195 acres. While consisting of numerous small parcels, most of the area is under single ownership. The site is also within the ACSA jurisdictional area and sewer lines will be extended through the site within the next year to serve the Airport. Public road access could be from either Route 606 or Route 29. In summary, there are two sites within the Hollymead Community which are void of major environmental and physical constraints and suitable for large scale development. However, of these, one site appears to offer the best opportunity for development with the fewest public utility, facility, and ownership constraints. The other is limited by multiple ownership and uncertain status of utility service. It has been indicated by the Virginia Department of Economic Development that, from an economic development standpoint, industries of this type prefer the ability to evaluate more than one or two prospective sites when making location decisions. , III. CONSISTENCY OF REQUEST WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan "leaves decisions on local economic development and provision of jobs to the private sector and leaves acreage, location, and development standards to the Plan's land use development section." (page 13) Therefore, there is no non-land use related economic development policy to "balance" against only land use considerations. In contrast and as an example, housing affordability and availability are given significant discussion in the Plan with multiple objectives and strategies that could be balanced against strict land use considerations for its provision. For this reason, a review such as this for amendment to the Plan is based primarily on land use policy and provisions. A textually descriptive element of the Land Use Plan section of the Comprehensive Plan is DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The plan states that (p. 154): "Development standards are intended to provide a guide to accommodating land uses in a manner harmonious with 4 ~ the natural and man-made environment. These standards are further intended to provide a basic framework for evaluating proposals for rezonings, special use permits, site plans, subdivisions, and other reviews in conjunction with applicable ordinance provisions. While not binding or all-encompassing, these standards are design~d to preserve the health, safety, and welfare of the County and its citizens. Use of alternative measures not defined in these standards should equally satisfy the public purpose and intent of this Plan." The following are the GENERAL STANDARDS for industrial land uses. Each is followed by staff comments and the request's consistency with these standards. A. Locate industrial uses adjacent to compatible uses (commercial, public, or other industrial, etc.) as opposed to residential or other sensitive areas. Locate agricultural and forestal industries convenient to the uses they support. Where an industrial use desires a location near a sensitive area, consideration should be given to transitional uses such as commercial offices. The proposed site ~s located adjacent to the Piney Mountain Village, the G.E. Fanuc industrial site and other commercial and industrial uses on the southeast side of Route 29. The surrounding area to the north and east consists primarily of rural residential development. B. Address objectionable aspects of an industrial use through a combination approach including realistic performance standards, buffering and special setback regulations. This approach should be flexible so as to accomplish the objective without creating burdensome and arbitrary regulations. At time of rezoning, the applicant s~ould submit proposals to mitigate objectionable aspects. Route 29 is designated as an entrance corridor route. There appears to be an opportunity to adequately buffer this area to minimize visual impacts by preservation of existing vegetation along stream valleys and steep slope areas surrounding the proposed expansion area. C. Encourage the location of industrial uses in areas where public utilities and facilities are adequate to 5 - , ~...- --... support such uses. Upgrading and extension of roads, water, sewer, electrical, telephone, and natural gas systems should be considered in review of an industrial application. This site is not located within the ACSA jurisdictional area for utility service. Therefore, public utilities are not available to this site. The Camelot Sewage Treatment Plant which serves the existing Piney Mountain Village does not have sufficient unreserved capacity to support development of this area. Development will require either upgrading the Camelot Plant or provision of new sewer lines along the North Fork Rivanna River and pump station to carry sewage to the Powell Creek interceptor. The water supply for this area is the North Fork Rivanna System. There is adequate capacity available during normal weather periods. However, there is concern about adequacy of supply during low flow periods. Two alternatives can be used to address this issue. Chris Greene Lake can be used to supplement stream flow during drought period or the North Fork System can be connected to the South Rivanna System. There is no favored recommendation from the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority or the Albemarle County Service Authority at this time. This concern will need to be addressed regardless of the disposition of this amendment request. D. Locate industrial uses within a half-mile of highway, air, or rail transportation facilities not only for convenience of the industry, but also to avoid industrial traffic through residential and agricultural areas and on roads not designed for such traffic. This site is locat€d within three miles of the airport. Route 29 is the primary North-South arterial road in the County. The Norfolk-Southern Railroad is located approximately two miles east of this area. However, no station or sidings are available in this area. Electricity and gas service are, or can be, made available to this area. 6 '----, ~ Fire, Rescue and Police protection are the primary public services potentially impacted by industrial development in this area. This site is currently served by the Earlysville Volunteer Fire Company. Response time to this area is currently 15 minutes. E. Accomplish rezonings to an industrial designation for sites of fifty acres or more under a planned development zoning designation accompanied by a transportation analysis plan. Rezonings and development of this area should be done under a planned development approach. In addition to these industrial land use standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance was recently amended to add Section 9.0 GUIDELINES FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SERVICE AREAS. These zoning provisions provide guidelines and mechanisms for establishment of service areas. Both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, therefore, contain detailed guidelines under which an applicant can improve the posture of a rezoning petition and site development plan. with the exception of available utility service and adequate public safety services, this site appears to generally meet the locational criteria for industrial service areas. It should be noted again that there are no economic development standards within the Plan to measure appropriateness of this request in terms of consistency with economic development policies. IV. SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED SITE FOR INDUSTRIAL SERVICE USE To evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed site for an industrial service land use designation, physical characteristics of the site (topography, soil characteristics, floodplain, wetlands), infrastructure, and public service needs and availability (water, sewer, transportation, police, fire and rescue, etc.) were analyzed. Environmental Soils Elioak Loam and Glenelg Loam are the predominate soils at this location. The Elioak Loam prevails in the center of the area. This soil is deep, generally sloping, and well drained. Permeability and available water capacity is moderate. Surface runoff is medium to rapid. Bedrock is generally at a depth of more than five feet. 7 '----., Glenelg Loam is present in the eastern and western portion of the area. These soils are deep, well-drained, and gently to moderately sloping. Permeability is moderate and available water capacity is high. Surface runoff is medium to rapid. Bedrock is generally at a depth of more than five feet. Slopes There is an area of critical slopes (25%) in the southwest portion of the area near Herring Creek. A large area of slopes between 15%-25% and 10%-15% are prevalent in the western portion of the site. The center portion of the site is relatively flat. The eastern portion has a limited amount of slopes between 10%-25%. Perennial and Intermittent stream/Wetlands/Floodplains Herring Creek is a perennial stream located on the western portion of the site near Route 29 with a pond contiguous to the stream. The County's Water Resource Protection Area Ordinance requires a 100 foot vegetative buffer around all tributary streams to retard nonpoint pollution sources and preserve water quality. There is also an extensive 100 year floodplain associated with Herring Creek. There are intermittent streams located throughout the site. Watersupplv Watershed The study area does not lie within the Albemarle County Watersupply Watershed. Agricultural/Forestal Districts There are no Agricultural/Forestal Districts located in the vicinity of the site. Scenic/Historic Route 29 is a designated Entrance Corridor road. The Entrance Corridor Overlay District generally consists of areas visible up to 500 feet from an Entrance Corridor road or on the entire parcel adjacent to the road, whichever is greater. The intent of the Entrance Corridor District is to preserve the County's natural, scenic, historical, and architectural resources along these designated roadways. The County's Architectural Review Board reviews all proposed development within an Entrance Corridor district. 8 ~ .--. -..-' A cottage located next to the former Mountain View School on Route 600, just west of the site, was formerly a cottage for the teachers at the school. A typical dwelling of its period, the house is recommended for the National Register. Also, there is a cemetery located within this area. Due to the elevation of the area a large scale development could be visible from extended areas to the east and west of this site. Site development and building design should be sensitive to the potential visual impact to the area. Public Facility Police This area is located in Police Sector C. Police tracking calls indicates that 27% of all of calls originating from the northern urban area and Hollymead along the Route 29 corridor. To reduce response and processing times the Community Facilities Plan recommends a police substation in the Hollymead Area to reduce response times to this area. This project is in the FY 1992-93 to FY 1996-97 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) and construction is scheduled to be funded in FY 1995-96. Fire and Rescue The proposed industrial service area would be served by the Earlysville Fire Department. Earlysville Volunteer Fire Company is equipped with two engines, one tanker, and two brush units. In addition to Earlysville, the stony Point Volunteer would respond since any fires from this site would be classified as a structure fire. The Community Facilities Plan recommends a response time of five minutes or less to all Growth Areas. A minimum response time to this location is approximately 15 minutes. In order to provide necessary fire fighting capability to this use an aerial truck would need to be provided. The City and County have a contract where the City agrees to provide supplementary 24-hour protection to the County. The City owns a aerial truck and will provide service to the County if the required staffing is available and the truck is not needed in the city. Estimated response time of the aerial truck to the proposed site is twenty (20) minutes. At this time, the Charlottesville-Albemarle Rescue Squad (CARS) provides Advance Life Support (ALS) and Basic Life Support (BLS) to the site. The Earlysville Fire Station 9 ~--..-.. --"" al.so would provide BLS through its "first responder" program. Responding with Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) , they are simultaneously dispatched with rescue squads. First responder units provide only BLS. The estimated response time for CARS is eighteen (18) minutes, and the estimated response for Earlysville is fifteen (15) millutes. The Community Facilities Plan recommends a response time to emergency calls of four minutes or less in Growth 1\reas. The Community Facilities Plan recommends a new fire station to serve the Hollymead and Piney Mountain areas. In addition, the inclusion of a rescue squad would be considered with the construction of the fire station. Water and Sewer Currently this site is not in the Albemarle County Service Area (ACSA) jurisdictional area. Therefore, water and sewer service is not available to the proposed site as previously noted in section III of this report. The Camelot Treatment Plant does not have available capacity to support additional development. Capacities are available in the North Fork Rivanna Water system, except during low flow periods. The options to provide water service include: Extend waterline from the South Rivanna Treatment Plant and pump water to the site and mothball the North Fork Rivanna Treatment Plant. Upgrade North Fork Rivanna Treatment and utilize Chris Green Lake as the supplemental water supply reservoir to augment the stream from the North Fork Rivanna River. Current usage of the North Fork Rivanna River Intake is estimated at approximately 130,000 gallons per day. The system is currently operational only two to three times a week. ACSA and RWSA have no recommendation at this time as to which option to pursue. However, the situation will have to be addressed regardless of whether this Plan amendment is approved or not. The options to provide sewer include: Eliminate the Camelot Treatment Plan and pump sewage back to the gravity line at Forest Lakes. This is less costly, but will only serve a limited area. Extend the sewer interceptor down the North Fork Rivanna River to serve the entire drainage basin. This is the most expensive, but serves the greatest area. 10 Upgrade the Camelot Treatment Facility to support Growth Area development within the North Fork Rivanna River drainage basin. The ACSA and RWSA have no recommendation at this time as to which option to pursue. The method of providing service to this area will be dictateQ by the ultimate area to be served. RWSA, ACSA, and the Board of Supervisors have previously stipulated that incrementally expanding this treatment plant every time there is a new development project is not to be the solution. The special use permit issued for the last expansion of the plant stated there would be no further expansion of the facility. TRANSPORTATION The site has access to Route 29 at two points. The best location for access is at an existing crossover at the southern end of the expansion area. This crossover will ultimately serve the second access to the Briarwood subdivision and existing commercially zoned land on the west side of Rt. 29. Grading for entrance at this location, including a stream crossing, has already been developed. Traffic generation for 100 acres of industrial service will depend on the characteristics of the industry (hours of operation, shift-work schedules, shipping demands, etc). Traffic generation for 100 acres of manufacturing to light industrial uses could range from 3880 to 5180 vehicle trips per day. The traffic impact from the proposed industry is estimated to be 4700 vehicle trips based on the available information. There is no information at this time on the level of shipments anticipated. Designation of another employment center area in the northern portion of the County may have implications on ultimate road network needed to serve this area. The location of a high traffic generator may require VDOT and the County to reconsider th: scope of proposed road improvements and needs for other projects, including: - Ultimate alignment of the Meadow Creek/Timberwood Parkway. - The need and timing of future improvements to Route 29 north of Airport/Proffit Roads. - The need for parallel road(s) to Route 29 to accommodate local traffic. At this time it is difficult to provide more definitive comments until more information on the industry is provided and a traffic analysis can be conducted. 11 Summary The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for either residential or non-residential development. There are large areas of slopes 15% and greater around the primary building site which would likely be impacted by a large scale development. The primary constraints to development are availability of public utilities and adequacy of public facilities to support large scale development. provision of major improvements to the sewer system will be required to ultimately serve this site. Also, overall improvement to the North Fork Rivanna system will be required. Police, fire and rescue response times do not meet the minimum response time standards for the Community Facilities Plan. V. SPECIFIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED INDUSTRY This Plan amendment is proposed for the purpose of accommodating an unnamed industry which is considering locating here. As noted in the background section of the report, very little specific information has been provided on this company. Therefore, staff is unable to provide a detailed analysis of impacts ,to the County. However, based on the information available on employment, an estimate has been made of the total employment and population growth which could be generated by this development. It is estimated that of the total 700 available. jobs, at least 275 will likely come from outside the existing regional labor force. The spin-off employment generated by the year 2000 from the influx of new jobs and expected to in-migrate is 186. Therefore, the total new jobs in-migrating is estimated to be 461. This translates into a total population increase of 805. (461 new jobs x .69 representing newly created households = 318. 318 new households x 2.53 average household si~e = 805). Of these 318 new households, it is estimated that 80 percent will locate within the County. Therefore it is estimated that 324 new households would locate in Albemarle County resulting in a population increase of 644. These are obviously very rough estimates based primarily on general information available for the unnamed company. VI. SUMMARY AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION In consideration of the information contained herein, staff finds the following: 12 1. There is very sketchy information available on this request, making full evaluation of this amendment very difficult. Based on the information provided to staff and staff's evaluation of the proposed site and alternative growth area sites, there do not appear to be any significant issues or concerns that warrant special consideration of an amendment. There is a large inventory of industrial land available for industrial development. Two alternate sites were found within the same general area of this request that are equal to or better for industrial development in terms of consolidated acreage and consistency with Comprehensive Plan standards. Both areas are located within the Hollymead Growth Area and Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area, and both have similar constraints and opportunities for development. 2. Other than this immediate request, there has been no general change in circumstance since approval of the Annual Report of the Comprehensive Plan, which includes recommendation to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of growth area expansions. This comprehensive evaluation would be conducted after the completion of the fiscal impact analysis (FY92-93). A comprehensive evaluation would allow the County to evaluate the anticipated land use needs and all potential expansion areas and determine the most appropriate expansion areas and land use designations for these areas. At this time it appears that our greatest need is for residential areas, particularly low density and high density areas. Given the physical, environmental and policy constraints for growth area expansion in the County, those areas which may hold potential for expansion should be used in the most efficient manner possible. Piecemeal changes in the Comprehensive Plan can limit the County's opportunity to efficiently plan for and utilize these areas in the long term. 3. The Comprehensive Plan does not have an economic development goal, policy or standards by which to evaluate the economic benefits/impacts of the proposal against the land use goals, objectives, and policies. Therefore, staff's consideration is based largely on land use issues. without a clear economic development policy and a fiscal impact modeling process it is very difficult for staff to evaluate economic benefits/cost to the County and, therefore, provide a balanced evaluation of this. proposal. 13 For these reasons, staff would not recommend amendment to the plan for this request. It has been noted in this report that, from an economic development perspective, having one or two potential sites for this type of proposal is not adequate. The report notes two possible sites that are currently designated in the growth areas. If the Board of Supervisors feels that this "inventory" is too limited, the proposed site generally meets industrial standards and would be acceptable on that basis as an added industrial service area designation. Should the Commission and Board decide approval of this amendment is necessary to satisfy the County's industrial land needs, staff recommends that the following statements and Map 1 be adopted as amendments to recommendations for the Village of Piney Mountain. it o An area east of Route 29 and west of~~he unnamed tributary of the North Fork Rivannali~ designated for industrial service. No development of properties above what is allowable under current zoning will take place until water and~.. ewe s~es are provided to the area consistent with(~WS;: and ~ S planning for the provision of se 'es t . th1S area. o Consider development proposal for the industrial area east of Route 29 under a planned development approach to allow for the coordination of public utilities and facilities, road access, and necessary internalized support services. o Access to Route 29 for the industrial service area east of Route 29 shall be limited to the existing crossover south of the Briarwood/G. E. Fanuc crossover. A second access to the site for emergency purposes should be considered during the development review process. o Route 29 is a designated Entrance Corridor Route. Due to the elevation of the industrial area east of Route 29 and its potential visibility from Route 2~as well as potential visibility from Route 600 and surrounding areas, development of this area will be subject to review for such visual impact. o An undisturbed buffer area along Herring Branch should be provided to reduce the visual impact along Route 29. Maintain natural buffers on the perimeter of the site along steep slopes and stream valleys. 14 In addition staff recommends the following: 1e Board of Supervisors reaffirmation of the recommendation for a comprehensive review of growth area expansion as contained in the Annual ReDort of the ComDrehensive Plan 1991. 2e Re-evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan's Economic Development section to consider additional non-land use related goals/objectives/strategies regrading economic development. 15 Village of.Plney 'Mountaln ~nd Use ) ), ~ . /I /"' jr ---\\\ IV::; ...F_______~{~ ///~"i\T"\'n\C \ .~/:/\\0/? \ / II 1 \\ I ;: I ! /' I Legend: _PrOposed industrial. 'Service EXpansion 'Area !iIil. .k1dustrial Service o 000 'Medium Density ~ 00 ~ Residential Low Density ~ Residential _ PubIc/Semi-PubIic. \ I " l' ./ \ N " ~. / \ I / \ i ! I I ! I f I t Seal. In Flit 0 1000 . 2000 4000 ~ / N_.... ....~.. t'~ N.-....-. " )/' '<)""7' / 0-. f.r'/'. 7' ~ RPAlF100d Plain E:!:3Treel.i1e .Scale k1 Feet, I ci .~OO .800'._ 1.:2 '~~~))f1~l ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY po, Box 1009 401 MciNTIRE RD, CHARLOTTESYI~\~~,:Y?off..?Qji1Affi.Cf?4) 296-5810 .\H" \J~C.[C:J iTi '\ 1 j \ ~ ,~ 'CI"I<'\ \ II' CE'VEr." J= ;78 1. ~\, i ""ft. .....) I I'~ ,-J ; ......', J lrTS 1 2 1992 D Or ::.~UPEF<ViSO;:t PLANNING DEPT. February 11, 1992 Mr. David Benish, Chief of Community Development Albemarle County Office Building Charlottesville, Virginia Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Designation of Industry site East of Route 29 North, Piney Mountain Area Dear David: This is in reply to your memorandum of January 28, 1992. You asked several questions concerning water and sewer service for an industry which may consider construc- tion of a one million square foot building with no unusual water or sewer demands. I have conferred with the staff of the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority concerning this matter and offer the following replies to your questions. 1. Capacitv of Existinq Sewage'Facilitv The existing sewage treatment plant on the N. Rivanna River has a capacity of 365,000 gallons per day. There is no capacity available for any additional connections except for those entities which have built additional capacity into the plant over the years and for which the capacity is reserved. Following is a breakdown of capacity allocation: Camelot/other existing users Reserved for GE/Fanuc Reserved for University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation Reserved for Woodbriar Assoc./ Gold Leaf Land Trust Treatment Plant Capacity There is sufficient '''capaci ty for the completion of Briarwood and Camelot subdivisions. 40,000 g.p.d = 25,000 g.p.d = 81,600 g.p.d = 218,400 g.p.d = 365,000 g.p.d = . , , 2. Capacitvof Existing Water Supplv Svstem The existing N. Rivanna water treatment plant is designed to produce water at a rate of 1,600,000 gallons per day. Current average daily water output is 188,000 gallons per day. The limiting factor at this treatment plant is raw water avail- ability. The safe yield from the river is 800,000 gallons per day. Based on the. information available to us the prospective industry would not use more than 25,000 gallons per day so water capacity appears not to be a problem. with or without this industry, there are issues concerning the future of the N. Rivanna water treat- ment plant that must be addressed in the near future. 3. Infrastructure Needs Since no water supply needs have been identified which would be required to serve the prospective industry, this will deal solely with sanitary sewer infrastructure ,needs. Over the past several years ACSA and RWSA have been studying the means of provid- ing sanitary sewer capacity to meet the long range requirements of this area. The existing sewage treat- ment plant on the N. Rivanna River cannot accommodate the area presently designated for growth. RWSA, ACSA, and the Board of Supervisors have previously stipulated that incrementally expanding this treatment plant every time there is a new development project is not to be the solution. The special use permit issued for the last expansion of the plant stated there would be no further expansion of the facility. Identified below are the various options and costs for providing long range sewer service to the area: 1. New sewage treatment plant (for cost comparison reasons) 2. Pump with single "high head" pump along Route 29 to Forest Lakes 3. Pump with dual pumps along Route 29 to Forest Lakes 4. Gravity sewer along N. Rivanna River with a "low head" pump to Powell's Creek Interceptor 5. Gravity sewer along the North Rivanna River to the Rivanna Interceptor $5,770,000 $2,660,000 $3,250,000 $4,902,000 $5,652,000 . .. 4. Cooperative Expansion Efforts Discussions have been held with various property owners in this area about providing additional sewer service. Opportunities do exist for cooperation with the private sector in funding the improvements. Speculation about expansion of this growth area has caused us to hesitate in developing a plan of action. The options involving gravity sewer are more costly but serve a much greater area. The pumping options are less costly but serve a more limited area. Selecting an option to serve just the existing growth area may be of limited or no benefit to land east of Route 29 if added to the growth area in the future. I hope this information will be helpful to you in preparing your report. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Very truly yours, 6<<fl J.W. Brent Executive Director c.c: Board of Directors George W. Williams JWB/lbt '" \ I'l) ",',V. (;,--,~,.A Zllc) /1 ')i ,::>'./ \ CO'I'.,- ....r (.J ,: ~ j\'/' (""": r.... ~ ,::--. .-.- - ,. '..'"."'. '.-' 1/,8 f MARL f? 'I i r ...j ~""'~::.i ,~::J-I-- r~" ~ I v......;,.. . '"'.,,,/,d..!7 -::;, 1 rl F;::~ ~.19 191"1') 1 LIft" . . 4'.: ,~~~rest ~c t v IS II. Jr So ":;'0' ,_ U 17'Cija: I 5 rtlO tir, Uf. "U. - . v ,,:} PER~~QR$rklOs While Hall Edward H Bain, Jr Samuel Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 David p, Bowerman Charlottesville Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors FROM: David P. Bowerman, Chairman DATE: February 19, 1992 RE: CPA-92-01 Piney Mountain Based upon the Planning Commission's deferral of this item, it is my feeling that the Board take this opportunity to provide the State and our community a better understanding of our economic and fiscal policies as it relates to industrial development. I propose that the Board take the following action this evening: . Defer, approve or deny CPA-92-01 Piney Mountain or refer this CPA back to the Planning Commission for recommendation by March 3, 1992i . A Board of supervisors' sponsored initiative which invites key representatives from the State Economic Development Office, City Council, the Chamber of Commerce, and other leaders of interest groups to view the various industrial locations in the County and City; . Appoint a committee of two (2) Board of Supervisors members, two (2) Planning commission members and five (5) citizens from the County to review and make recommendations concerning two items: the County's Economic Development Policy and Strategies and a Fiscal Impact Analysis of Development on Albemarle County. DPB/dbm 92.007 '\ Board of Supervisors Meeting, February 19, 1992 {{e.Ull(CtC ZJ}Y9'L Are there any residents of Albemarle County (other than !~(5~~~ developers) who admire the congestion, the acres of concrete, and the high tax rates in Northern virginia? There is still time for Albemarle to learn from the mistakes of counties like Fairfax. It is crucial that each supervisor carefully consider how decisions made today will affect the future of everyone who lives here. The sudden massive influx of new residents connected with the mystery Fortune 500 company would require compensatory growth in the county's infrastructure: new schools, new roads, new police and fire protection. We strongly urge you not to amend the Comprehensive plan. A few wealthy people would benefit; everyone else would have to shoulder the burden of increased taxation, thus driving up already high housing costs and forcing poorer people to leave Albemarle County. Three Board members are on the record acknowledging that rapid residential growth results in higher taxes. In the fall of 1991, Citizens for Albemarle asked county supervisor candidates the question, "How do you think residential population growth affects real estate property taxes?" Charles Martin answered, "Residential population growth increases the need for services which increases real estate property taxes." Forrest Marshall said, "It depends on the type of growth. For example: a retirement home obviously requires fewer services than a company which relocates its entire workforce from outside Albemarle County, bringing with it families whose children's education must be provided for." Walter Perkins replied, "Residential population growth causes an increase in real estate property taxes. More people demand more services which cost money. Residential properties require about $1.20 in services for each $1.00 collected in taxes." In response to a question about affordable housing, Charles Martin stated, "The County should promote affordable housing within the context of the comprehensive Plan. I do not want Albemarle County in twenty years to look like Fairfax. On the other hand I do not want Albemarle County to become a place where all of its police officers, teachers, nurses and other midlevel professionals have to live in an adjoining county where they would not have a vote in the county in which they work." This Comprehensive Plan Amendment, which could allow the sudden influx of hudreds of new residents not only would start the Fairfaxation of Albemarle County, it also would drive up property taxes, thus making it harder for middle and lower income people to live here. We strongly urge you to vote against this amendment. '.. l\ .~ ~.~ -:;:. (/ '", ('~ \' \ ~-v~ r-vv~ ~~~ ~~~~~ Peggy and Dan Beattie 225 ISpswich Place Charlottesville, VA 22901 J ~Cl'//~c/ ~-/j?--;f? /4 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE & ALBEMARLE COUNTY TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors RE: CPA-92-01 EXPANSION OF PINEY MOUNTAIN FOR INDUSTRY SERVICE LAND USE Good for the Planning Commission ~ The League applauds last night' s vote to defer action on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for up to six months. We are pleased that the commissioners avoided making a precipitous decision in response to pressure. We are pleased that they see the importance of maintaining the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan and the amendment process. It was important to have clarification that conditional zoning is illegal, that no condition can be put on an amendment that would return the land to its original zoning designation if Company X does not come to Albemarle. Above all, we are pleased that the commission recognized that vital pieces of information are lacking about the industry itself and about its impact on the community. As one commissioner said, "We don't want to buy a pig in a poke." So far, so good. Now it's your turn. Before going further we want to repeat what we said last night -- that the League believes very strongly in jobs for our area residents. We repeatedly support programs at CATEC and Piedmont Virginia Community College that prepare our young people and help to retrain our more mature workers to meet the needs of local business and industry. We support an economically vlable Central Virqinia cOl'lL"I1unity with a diverse economic base that provides jobs and choices of jobs for people in our area. Of course jobs are important, but there are other very legitimate considerations. Others have (and probably will) address our concerns about spin- ott impact on sch~ols ar~ other infrastructure, about traffic and company trucks, about air quality, noise, solid waste, about ad.equate fire, rescue, and police service; about the character of the jobs that would be offered to area workersl and about tlscal impact. .ill ..Ill -:f'bi OOl!l l Al "I 'I 1~ t: .~ F'!efiel~n'RL '_ ft "'1!J.~a~t. 2 We will focus tonight on two major concerns. The first is about water and sewer service to the North 29 region, expecially because the information presented last night was so confusing. There are serious questions about water supply and about water and sewage treatment capacities. The area north of Airport Road is served by the North Ri vanna Water Treatment Plant. While this plant has a capacity of 2 MGO, its water source, the North Fork Ri vanna River, can provide a safe yield of only .8 MGD -- and as little as .3 MGO during periods of low flow. Under the best of circumstances, the river will be an adequate source only until 1995, according to the Krebs Report for the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority. If Chris Greene Lake is tapped as a water source, the North Fork plant can be upgraded at a cost of $713,000. The Camelot Sewage Treatment Plant, which serves the area North of Airport Road, has a capacity of 365,000 GPO. It does not have adequate capacity to treat all sewage within its service regiont according to studies done for the Hi vanna Water and Sewer Authority. In fact, capacity will be reached by 1996, just to accommodate current use and that already allocated for the planned expansion of Briarwood and Camelot. The least expensive solutions to provide additiona.l sewage service in the Camelot area are estimated to be $2,660,000, plus still-to-be-determined costs for collection. Regardless of the water and sewer estimates that sound so optimistic tor the North 29 area, high.ly respected consultants have advised the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority aoout severai expansions that wili be needed in the immediate future due to growth and requirements of the Safe Drinking Wat.er Act < P l.ans are ~lre~<1Y "1.!:.der'lfay tGr- i:!'.:pi~E':F-ntation throl.1q'n tile Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Capital ProJects Improvement. 2rooraE:. Please na~e tna't a list ot: exis1:ing water !,'ac1iities and Scheduled Capital Projects is attached to our written statemeut. A l~rGe question is: how will the cost of expanding services be shared among: the taxpayers." ~at~~ .'\00 sewer u.S'''':'!.-:::':, e.~;! the !:'~i ,:;:''1:::: co .a.........-f- .--..,- '..J .,J....."- ................ .. Rlva~na ~ater and Seeer duthority and Albemarle County service Authority should not be Dressurad to li~ke a prealp~tOli5 decision. Our second major concern has to do with gro",rth manageE!:?nt e:!_nd c0~prenen5iv~ planning. Growth is here and more is coming willy nilly~ whether it is this company or some o~~cr~ Gro~~h must be manacredJ Ti!:le mu~t be 4~.t.Lcwed fer fair hearinq.s with cO.mplete disclosur~ to permit decisions bas~~ ~rr ~=~~~~~~nSLve ~r0te3~~0rra: ~v~lllat~Q~. ?~e~~~e=~ ~~v~10pmentt part~cularly under pressure~ is unacceptable. Citizeps must have tal~G t~at the intr~3tr~G~~r~ ::"&.:: ~~~;:.~.~.:-~, :::-8;;; h!.l:: l.z:e=:=: :..::~ i:~.pulation ~ that our roads will not become so clogcred and our ai::.... :and wat2~ S0 r:'C~l!.~ltect~ ''JS!" r~=-=-1.. =.::C:. I 3 agricultural lands so diminished, that we lose the values we cherish in our community. The Planning Commission and staff have recognized that it is incomplete until it includes the supporting documents that permit its orderly implementation. Some of these documents are still not in place, so you and we lack the specific tools to enable us to make credible decisions. The County has not yet adopted the Open Space Plan. 'rhe key Public utilities Plan is only in draft stage. The Social Data Base is not yet available. The Urban Drainage Update is not yet available. The Fiscal Impact Analysis recommer~ed in the 1991 First Annual Report of the Comprehensive Plan, is not yet underway. These studies are just as important in evaluating the current proposal as they were in considering recent proposals in the Holloymead Growth Area that were withdrawn or deferred because of laCK ot information. We urge that these necessary studies be moved along as rapidly as possible, even if it mear.s em.ploying ad-:titional staff. Once studies are complete, all growth areas, particularly those in the Hollymead-Piney Mountain area, need to be evaluated and the information coordinated. Decisions could be made tnen anQut whero<? -e:r:r:-ansion ~Qul.d prod.uce the most efficient use of fiscal, human, and natural resources. wi thout gr~"n:h manaqeilien't, t.:ompan::[ ,t;. CQUl.d use up a ~aJor ~~rtion of av~iiable resources~ such as permits for air quality and water discharqes, and curtail other ind~~trial or D25ioiential. ~~Yeiop~nt in all the Route 29 Horth Growtb Areas. Based on these considerations awi our r~vip.w of lasT. n1~rrtFs act~vn nv tne ~1;:l!;ni...C" t~,;;rwU.551.Cn, the- Lea{;fo...i.-e .....rges you to deny approva~ of the proposed amer~ment, A rezoning of this land from agricultural to industrLai must De '~'!)n~id""t~d -".$ part of a total picture. If it is not, it is unfair to other developers, sets danqerQus DrEcedc~~s" an~ ~~de~ffil~~S ~n~ ~.::..:;.l.e !.!:":er:.t 01:: the Gc,mprehensive Pla.n. At the very least ~ we recommend that you deter decis10rr on ~~e~~L~~ th~ CQ~~re~e~El~e p .:UU1 ~.m~ 11. YOI_~ n~v~ 81.1.1:.t IGi~rl"t inf'.:>rmat ion and planninq tools to assess the short and lonq ranae im.~act5 ,::;n ,:},..:cr ,::OTIill}).I.rll tv. r.lnail.v. i~!ardl~Ss of: -wi'lat action is taken (m this application tonight~ the Board should SlippO~~ ~~~ ~~~~~lS TP~0mmonM~rTnn~ rn :_~~":idht;::t 7.. '~'::::'~':::-7t~!?nS 1 Vi? rl?Vli?W D1" ~rQ~-th area expansion, and t.o reevaluate the Compl.-ehBn5l-..r8 P l~.n ~ s: t~~flc~m_lf,~ L~~V~ Lrypg;.~rrt:' Si?~-:-"t 1 ~--'n .~ 7r~//~c/ 'l---/Ji'-f?2 ~ LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE & ALBEMARLE COUNTY RIVANNA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY (RWSA) WATER FACILITIES 1992 Source of Water Safe Yield Treatment Plant Treatment Capacity Sugar Hollow Reservoir } 5.0 MGD Observatory Mt. 5.50 MGD Ragged Mt Reservoir S. Fork Rivanna Reservoir 12.0 MGD S. Rivanna 8.00 MGD N. Fork Rivanna River * 0.8 MGD N. Rivanna 2.00 MGD Beaver Creek Reservoir 2.0 MGD Crozet 1.00 MGD Totier Creek Reservoir 1.0 MGD Scottsville 0.25 MGD Total Urban Treatment Capacity = 15.5 MGD Total Urban Safe Yield = 17.8 MGD *Chris Green Lake, although a recreational lake, is still considered a supplemental water supply reservoir needed to augment the stream flow of the river intake during low flow periods. SCHEDULED CAPITAL PROJECTS/URBAN WATER The RWSA has focused on urban water capital needs, particularly in the rapidly developing 29N corridor. Planning for dams, treatment facilities, and water lines is a more complex and expensive process than ever before because of changing laws and regulations, such as the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), Below are the major capital projects RWSA has planned or is in the process of constructing. Scheduled Capital Projects 1. Transmission Main $5.772.000 - Must be completed by 1993, Provides connection between S. Rivanna Water Treatment Plant and Observatory Water Treatment Plant. 2. Sludge Management for S. Rivanna Water Treatment Plant $2.380.000 - Required by State Water Control Board's discharge permit. Increased amount of sludge will be produced by existing and expanded plant. 3. Expansion/Upgrade of S. Rivanna Water Treatment Plant to 12 MGD $2.059.000 _ Completion date, fall 1993. Expansion of production needed to meet demand and comply with Safe Drinking Water Act. Estimated cost assumes N. Fork Rivanna Water Treatment Plant remains in use. 4. Expansion of S. Rivanna Water Treatment Plant from 12 MGD to 16 MGD by adding flashboards Approx. $100,000 - Additional land and engineering studies will be required. If this option does not prove feasible, supplemental water supply must come from Buck Mountain. 5. Buck Mountain Dam and Reservoir $27.500.000 - Planning and permitting beginning by 1994. Anticipate needing Buck Mountain Reservoir by 2007. The city and county enacted a "Buck Mountain Surcharge," which applies to all new accounts. RWSA estimated that it will produce $55,000 to $130,000 annually for debt service on bonds issued for land acquisitions (In 1990 received $163,700; in 1991 $129,000). 6. S. Fork Rivanna Reservoir Bathymetric and Safe Yield Analysis $30.000 - Completed by October 1992. Needed to determine safe yield of reservoir in order to know whether flash boards are feasible and to be able to judge more precisely the timing of need for Buck Mountain, which has a safe yield of 18 MGD. 7. N. Rivanna Water Treatment Plant (serves only area north of Airport Road) $713,000 - 1995. Required to meet level 1 of Safe Drinking Water Act requirements and does not solve long- term question of what to do about this plant whose source of water (N. Fork Rivanna) produces only 800,000 gallons per day. 8. Review Observatory Treatment Plant $25.000 study only - 1993 for Safe Drinking Water Act compliance. 9. Southern Loop, Eastern Branch $1.750.000 - Unscheduled. Part of an agreement negotiated between City and Albemarle County Service Authority. Urban Wastewater 1. Camelot Wastewater Treatment Plant two alternatives: $7.090.000 and $7.870.000 - 365,000 GPO package treatment plant constructed by a private developer. Capacity will be reached by 1996. Consultant has recommended that the wastewater from its service area be sent to Moore's Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. 2. Compost Yard/Rivanna Pump Station Improvements $349.000 - Under construction. 3. Moore's Creek Relief Server Part II $1.400.000 - Needed to accommodate future development south of city. Not scheduled. 4. Meadow Creek Relief Server $1.110.000 - Not scheduled. Existing Meadow Creek Interceptor is approaching capacity, 5. Expansion of Moore's Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant $5.000.000 - Start 2007; completion 2010. Plant designed for a flow of 15 MGD approaches capacity about 2000. Note: City/Albemarle County agreement concerning allocation of costs will be necessary on many of these projects. However ACSA customers can expect to pay a large share because so much of the construction is the result of growth in the county. Leo fl. CWle!f /82/ LonLcena Wa!f ChanLotteAvULeJ VA 2290/ 804-97]-/56/ Febnuan!f 7J /992 'Readen/J.' V Lew-1. The OaU!f ~no~ne-1.-1. ~.O. Box 90]0 ChanLotteAvULeJ VA 22906 ThiA concennA the necent 1001anaJ1J about pOllAL64 ne,!oni..n.~ a halL4- deACnLbed panceL 01. Land. 'RepontedL!fL Lt iA 75-/00 acneA out U.j-. HLfYuva!f 29J -1.ont ot acnollA Inom (i.e... /-anuc. I'm conlLdent that oun Count!f SupenviAon-1. ane cO[JfiL,!ant olJ althougiz not nece-1.-1.anLL!f vocal about; -1.ome 01 the 10LLowi..n.~: / . II thene ane valLd ne.cu1OnA Ion ne,!oni..n.~ fnopent!fJ the -1.eemi..n.~ i.mpontance 01 the alLe~ed ownen .1houLdn' t be a ' ne.cu1on". 2. The "Fontune 500" nanh.i..n.f) dovm't i..n. an!f wa!f mean that the I.Lmn hWl a ~ood tnack necond oj Dei..n.~ a ~ood "conponate cLtL'!en". ALL the pUb1LCLt!f about thiA facet -1.U~~eAt-1. that oun coLLectLve vLntue on Land U-1.e hWl a pnLce. ]. II the new-1. nepont-1. ane ne.cu1onabL!f connectJ thene ane /0-/] ti.meA Wl fTIJ1.ch pnopent!f alnead!f ,!oned "Indu-1.tnLal" i..n. the count!f that iA not bei..n.~ U-1.ed Wl ,!oned. 4. OeciALOnA made i..n. hWlte don't achLeve conunon ~ood when dea1i..n.~ wLth a ~Lan that ha-1. been eAtabLiAhed to pnovLde meWluned and deLLbenate contnoL 01 Land U-1.e. 5. A-1. a pnactLcal mattenJ ynovLdi..n.~ the bWle Ion anothen Lan~e empLojen to dump tnallLc on U.j'. 29 wou1d -1.hontL!f ma[JfiLf.!f the vehLcuLan tnaf.fLc haJ,and-1. that ane bad enougiz now. ~neAumabL!fJ the SupenviAon-1. wLLL then nave an oppontunLt!f to wonn!f about the LocatLon of anothen b!fPaAA that wouLd bypaAA the bflPaAA pnopo/J.ed Ion cLo/J.en i..n.. 6. In ma.ki..n.~ detemni..n.atLOnA 01 thiA UkJ Lt iA not onl.!f i.mpontant to be laLn but al-1.0 to be convi..n.ci..n.r;;1.!f laLn. 7. ALL ane aJ1Jane 01 the cunnent economLC neCe-1.-1.Lon. Tho-1.e who mL~t -1.toop to natLonalL,!i..n.~ that "thiA WLLL help -1.oLve the unemp'Lo~ent pnobLem i..n. ALbemanLe Count!f' wouLd be weLL-adviAed that Lt mone '1.i..hu!f wouLd help -1.oLve (ineene Count!f'-1. unempLo)f'TZent pnobLem. The va9-UeL!f deACnLbed. LocatLon iA va9-UeL!f one mLle fnom the count!f Li..n.e. In bnLelJ thL-1. dovm' t -1.eem to be the wa!f to admi..n.iAten Land U-1.e. 5 i..n.ceneL!fJ ,~.......~..!~ _ ) (/, - L- /? ~. ~. D. <, \ \--0 ~00.M\ 2 II '-Ill <- ALBEMARLE COUNTY FARM BUREAU 1128 East High Street . Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 2/18/92 COUNTY OF Ai.8EMARLt r . -" r--\ ~--...... n i..'." I ~., I rr: on 11 r;::J !fil Ii. :i.....IJ~...t;.",,::..I.._. ".Ll. .I", ... n Ii;':' " , ' ". I ii', rr-s j ~ 1992 d'~' ~.I I,' " I , ~' i '- '" .. . ' , U \ \! i'::J.'''i,.:?l''iL''':''Tf''"rt''~tT ~,I._,. \'........ Io.;;;oJ U U 1..::,1 .8CMRD OF SUPERVISOliS Mr. David Bowerman, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Dear Mr. Bowerman, Attached is a copy of a letter I had published in the Daily Progress last month. It still fairly well sums up the attitude of Albemarle's large population of family farmers towards poorly planned development. Please do not throwaway the many years and hundreds of thousands of tax dollars spent on developing the comprehensive plan. We must not consume Albemarle County's unique and precious farmland if only to replace it with a tale. Recessions come and go. The employment offered by this "mystery company" may go in the next one. Our family farmers have been supporting our community steadily for over two hundred years. This is not fantasy. Huge factories are urban structures and require urban infrastructure. Tourists do not come to see them. Developers should confine their speculation to land already appropriately zoned. They must accept the risk of doing otherwise, not the current taxpaying citizenry. S i ncer )1~~/~!./ ;.r. .' .if. ...:.....'./' . f/'--;" t /f? 2; Robert A. Bloch, President /) ''y''( .I t J' 7' 1 ,/./. :,/ .A. · r/" ~'t /-,-II/}I,,+-" t:???<7 .,..:>:-;r7 t,4 1/'0 , " "v." ,,' , /" 0- ,/ I " -:I "I.t:"6/~ /' i ~' 1< ;' /'., / 'i./ / /'~:~''-tt1 /c~ Robert A. Bloch Rt. 2 Box 236 Gordonsville, VA 22942 (804) 296-2137 ph/fax 1/6/92 Daily Progress Readers' Views Sirs: It's time again to debate enticing new industry to Albemarle County. It seems we want an industry that pays more in local taxes than it consumes in government services. It should be attractive to current residents, worth a trip for tourists and use no billboards. It must release no toxic wastes, Indeed, it must safely recycle most of its own wastes on-site, It must not increase commuter traffic nor require variances from the Comprehensive Plan. It must employ a representative sample of our population, providing all with paid, on-the-job training in meaningful trades from welding and diesel mechanics to biotechnology and ultrasound. It must provide free housing to most employees. A portion of the facility's grounds must be dedicated to wildlife refuge. The industry's recreational facilities should be regularly available to non-employees. The industry should purchase 90% of its supplies and services locally. The demand for goods produced by this industry must be constant through all economic conditions in order to provide stable employment and tax revenue. It might take a miracle to find another such ideal industry. Fortunately we have one in our midst already. Our local family farms have provided this dependable economic base for generations and can continue, but only with our neighbors' support. Over the years our Board of Supervisors has taken much criticism for its growth policies, some of it justified. However, it is prudent to study carefully the social and economic consequences of converting our productive soils forever to concrete and pavement. The "highest and best use" for most of our land, as Jefferson knew, remains agricultural, Cows do not require new classrooms. Timberland requires no deceleration lanes. Tourists come for the scenery. They have their own developments. Many have moved to this area because they "fell in love with it," Their taste is admirable, but if they did not come with a job, then they, not we, are imprudent, and we owe them no duty in housing or employment. We owe our best efforts to our current citizens and our land. We need affordable housing and dependable jobs for our working families, yet we live here because an urban lifestyle does not appeal, It is imperative that before we convert farmland we be convinced that the trade-off truly will improve all our lives. Sincerely, Robert Bloch Albemarle County \.. I \."... ,)--..or.. ..,.,(C II '7 f c1 L i ..J I ~t. v -' ~ ,I-,d R M ARETAIL MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION and CREDITBUREAU af CHARLOTTESVILLE 206 E. MARKET STREET CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA, 22901 * 296-7043 )1 .: '" ..' iF r ~ , , ,'" ~; ." \;! .: i ii February 14, 1992 U CF ;:u I.." . L !'\ -/ >,._ I) t.:~.'..S Mr. David Bowerman, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Albemarle County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 Dear Mr. Bowerman: On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Retail Merchants Association, I am writing this letter to put forth our membership's viewpoint concerning the issue of business in Albemarle County. We strongly encourage the Board of Supervisors to take a public and posi ti ve stand toward the issue of new business in this County. We urge language in the Comprehensive Plan to reflect a more positive approach to attracting appropriately diverse and clean businesses to the County. Also, we would encourage the Board of Supervisors to assist existing businesses in the county of Albemarle so that we may retain them, in this area, as contributing members of this community. All of us want to protect the magnificent beauty of this area, and we feel responsible businesses can come to this area, preserve its natural beauty, and enhance the total quality of life that we all enjoy. As you know better than most, business in this area is what enables each of us to live, work, and raise families here. We cannot rely on one institution to continue to predominate this aspect in our community as they, too, have limited resources and shrinking funding sources from which to draw. I appreciate your consideration of our views and would request that you share them with the other members of the Board of Supervisors. We feel that we must be proactive at this time because more and more businesses are moving or locating int9 areas that express a probusiness sentiment very forcefully. To encourage appropriate economic development and cooperate with neighboring jurisdictions will help to ensure the future and quality of life for our children so they may remain in this area we cherish. As always, if I or any of our members can be of assistance to you SERVING CENTRAL VIRGINIA SINCE 1924 ,# or any other member of the Board of Supervisors, please do not hesitate to let us know. Respectfully yO~ ~~~U~~) David W. Roop President cc: Mr. A. D. Towe Mr. W. B. Downer Mr. H. D. Morris Mr. c. R. Brooks Mr. W. Luers Mr. c. T. Baber Ms. P. Jensen Mr. W. Bickley Mr. J. F. Nelms Mr. J. S. Parks Mr. L. B. Harper Ms. M. Gardner Nov. '"Z, 8, 1978 " s; .,j - r fi i~ ... , ., " ':' . ..8 , h '5 -} " > 0 z ~ . j - ~ '~ ci e 1: sa.. 'Q .= :> .. .~~ := ,( J ~ ~ ;: (I ~ , """,\y. p/2e 0" ~ c.{ ~ I ,~ \ "1 L ~I~ne' Carpi:l Plant Here ' \. '., , Unlikely NoW By PETER JlACQUE ness, many customers who aJ..' of The Progress Staff ready bave bought sect.ioas of, It appears unlikely that Bede the airplane kUs would never be General Corp., the financially able to obtain the. necessary. troubled manufacturer of light ' parts to finl8h their airplanel.~;. aircraft, will Jocate on.a,_~ct~.:~..._The FT.. C..:.IlaS,. DO ..qHPpJaipl,. of land in. AtberJw:le ~tl;;:; ,abdut.thegUlUl! o(~~i ~hich waa the 'ubj~t'~f{~,,~:;/I<~~tr1~'Ulh4'e'a ~ runoDlus re~'ac~.:~;.Slon-appro~~ mana,., lieDer thi~Jeat?-W~~JJ'. "'~w'.'."li~1'!::~~"'~., '~...:_,.'~l~..~ \ velVper. ',' ~ " ~'~ "UU!U{; ~~I~,;':~:~~~~r l~.:tr.<>.~..., I.')" : ask~ the coUnty to change the~ ...'l:~=~l::rC:Oos~'t6e; zonmg on a _acre pa~ next. ~____. Ie ~'~ .-li- to the Cbarlottesvll.1~A1be- land's -1ODinC'for'limited Ul.Z ~ ~~e=u1a. ..f=C::.~' the aircraf~~~pany, with a re-. , The .0fI , . .......' 1'1 ~. puled $5 ~'annualpayrol1..WeeQ.ago=ed the.rezoa; for ita 4~ ~~, could buiJdi' iDe-oU11 a ". 'Jcr:ea owOOci there. ' r: ..... ,.' ,by WOod for the COWIty'lfint Though th'aJ rezonIng was P1aJmed\ihdus.ttial'Jw'k:.~~ :;! denied, the SOard 9f Supervi- The supervISOrs, w~~. relu~l sors changed:tlie zoning May 10 tant togqntWood s wtial., 00.42 acres o{the tract for the . acre req~t for limited induJ4 Bede plant. trial r.oning next to ~e a1rf1eld But the whole deal was based because, they said, It wu too. on Bede General receiving a $6 much i.ndus~ land In one million federal loan guarantee place W1~ too litUe county cOD~ from the U.S, Fanners.Home trol oyer It. , ' AdministratiOn to build the As-a ~t of Wood's first re-': local plant, and the finn's ap- quest, t~e- Bo~rd ~doptedll, plication bas been denied. planned mdustrlal district law According to Wood, "It's not to giv.e the ~ublic that cont~l totally counted out. . .but it's over industrial growth, which probably true" that the Cleve- some. of the supe.rvisors see ~ land finn will not come to Albe- spurrmg population growth m marle. the already fast-growing A group of private investors county, thereby pushing taxes in Pennsylvania are trying to higher. ' find the funds to finance the One supervisor, asking not to plant there, he said. be identified, has said, "We "I'In still workin~ with never should have given ~im them," the Albemarle bUsiness- (Wood) that (~-acre) rezorung, man and banker said. ~'There is ..I. never beU~Ved Bede ~as a posslblity'" Bede may yet conun, here, I,~ eat the first build bere ' plane It makes. :. . Wood has argued that indus.' . Bede prmlanlr sells alrcraft trial development supports the . kits. It ow~. Ita customers prosperity of the locality .and I about ..3 rmdioa that F~eral therefore . sbeuldbe.....eJI(lfJlr.-~~ Trade ~om,MlsliOD officials "Ied, .... .:',:. .f. ;/ haye wd will probably. not be:::, The. Bede rezooinc . was' aD;' paid bac~ if l!: co.mpany ~~Ids, "-,,oddity amolJl.A1bfmarle.r~ The commialoo bad accused iogs In that it had widespread' the com~ny1f misrepresent. support from ~."J' thebusi...~ iog the avai~bmty of parts tg... ,~.r;f.'QPIIIJ* bu("t-adjc;JUlm" build the airplanes, single-seat, propt~ dW.liI..wfth essentft ~ propeller-drlven BOo5s, aily no opposition to the land'~ U the firm goes' out of busi. use chanJ[e. 1& L\ ~ c.f "( It') I") L :r u..\lj ~) l C\ I 8 County Alters Zoning TOiAILQ~,A.ltpraft Pla;"t (0 1~ETER BACQUE - we've taken a ,few steps fo~ _ The Bede d~al ilt'8tiU~t~g- of The PropulStaff ward after so long a time," wd ent, Wood said, on'....r.raogm,: The Albemarle. Board of So.' Wooci:after.the decision. _ the financing for about $9OO,OOQl pervisors Wednesday amended . Wood bad' proposed - and in. water, sewer and road im-~ the county's zoning ordinance still is considering - building, pro.ements with the airplane to permit construction of an air. an i~dustrial park on ~ acres manufacturer or the ~ventuaJ.: craft assembly plant on a 42- that mcludes the Bede Site, but approval of the industrial park.; acre site near the Charlottes- the Supervisors turned down his While it would have been eco- - viIle-Albemarie Airport. request for industrial rezoning nornically possible for him to' The zoninl[ chanfe will.allow for the entire parcel May 3, be- pay for the installation of the, the location of lifh aircraflas- caus~ the county does ~ot now improvements on the 292-acre sembly plants in he Limited In- have a planned industnal park dustrial~1 zone, zone in its zoning law, The c ge was requested by . businessman Wendell W, Wood, who has contracted to sell the land between U.S. 29 North, Airport. Road and Chris Greene Lake Road to Bede General Corp.: a manufacturer of small airplanes, The amendment restricts any aircraft plants to building planes weighing 25,000 pounds or less, and.from components manufactured off the site. The Albemarle Planning Commission had recomtnended that the ehanges in the Limited Industrial zone be broader, al- lowing for the assembly of vehi- cles, for instance, but the supervisors were reluctant to agree to the wider range of uses. "It's simply too broad," said Charlottesville Supervisor F, Anthony lachetta of the Com- mission's suggestions, "to ac- commodate what Mr. Wood baa asked for. "It opens up a significant number of uses which I would have problem supporting in the M-l zone, and some I would have problems with in the M-2 (General Industrial zone) I" he said. "It's always nice to look like See ZONING, Page AI0 * Zoning CODtiDUed from Page Al property, with the potential for 10 industries to build there, those investments become too large to be borne by Bede Gen- eral and himself alone on the 42- acre tract, Wood said. The vote to change the ordi- nance's provisions was 5-1, with- Jack Jouett Supervisor C, Tim. othy Lindstrom oppoSed. linds- trom had sought to allow the aircraft manufacturing plants only by special-permit, rather than by right of the landowner. The Jack Jouett supervisor argued that because an airplane. manufacturing operation has "far-reaching implications for surrounding landowners,...an added measure of protection is owed" to them. 'r Gentlemen: Many perplexing questions are being raised by the landowner/developer that the Albemarle Board of Supervisors act immediately to change a rurally-zoned property to Industrial Zoning. Presumably a "Fortune 500" company has shown interest in 75-100 acres of the developer's property bordering the east side of Route 29 North, roughly across from the GE-Fanuc facility. What troubles many residents is that the Supervisors and Planning Commission are being asked to revise the 20-year Comprehensive Plan to :accommodate the landowner's request without even knowing the name of the purported company, what type of manufacturing it will bring to our county, and even if the company is seriously interested in locating here. The only information the Supervisors have to act upon is that being supplied by the landowner himself. If the Board decides to take pre-emptive action and revise the Plan, the landowner will have his property value escalated from rural zoning to industrial usage from that time on--whether 'or not the company chooses his site. Albemarle County's Comprehensive Plan is a blueprint for orderly, balanced growth in all sectors: rural, residential, commercial, industrial. It already allows for 1,100 acres of industrial property development. The Plan places high priority on preserving the natural environment and quality of life which Albemarle residents treasure and want to be protected. It was developed carefully over several years and reflects the input of thousands of Al bemarle citizens and dozens of civic, business, educational and residential groups. Contrary to those who are now assailing the Board of Supervisors, the plan has not stymied growth in the County. In the last ten years there has been a surge of new residents, new retail businesses and new industry brought about in part because of the attractive environment and living amenities which the Plan protects. A few with vested interests should not be allowed to invalidate the Comprehensive PLan for their own gain. If the demands of one landowner/developer are caved in to, then the floodgates will be down. All others with similar interests will demand the same treatment and the Plan will be in shambles. Albemarle County will be on its way to urban blight such as many East Coast areas have experienced -- the closest being Fairfax. We believe the Board of Supervisors is sincerely attempting to abide by the Readers' Views Daily PROGRESS Charlottesville, VA t>, 7+ \0 ~oW\.dZ II c\ I c1 L February 18, 1992 Mr. David P. Bowerman 401 McIntyre Rd Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Bowerman: I am writing to make you aware of my deep concerns regarding the possible 'amendment to the comprehensive plan in regard to the proposed consideration of Albemarle County by a Fortune 500 company. The comprehensive plan has been created by and for the benefit of the current residents of Albemarle County, These citizens have a right to expect this plan will be adhered to unless they are convinced it is to their collective benefit to amend this plan. The proper course of action for the Board to take on any proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan is to evaluate every facet of such a proposal, including comprehensive Environmental and Fiscal Impact Studies. An appropriate length of time should be allocated to this evaluation so that the Board is totally comfortable with the possible impacts that the proposed change could have on the County and its residents. It is far better to err on the side of caution by adhering to the comprehensive plan rather than to risk the venture into the unknown so as not to pass up a possible "opportunity". It would seem the possible long-term negative impact of this "opportunity" on most of the current residents of the county would deter short-sighted action on the part of those persons with whom Albemarle citizens have entrusted the power of decision making for the county. There seems to be a virtual panic atmosphere about "buying" jobs for the county, despite a current unemployment rate for which most of the country strives, I believe this atmosphere is based on flawed, or at the very least, unproven reasoning. There are recent studies that certainly show that there is an increase in the property tax burden associated with commercial and industrial expansion that is tied with population growth, The role of county government is to accommodate growth not promote it and the precedent of amending the comprehensive plan for one developer to promote growth is a very dangerous precedent. There is ample properly zoned land available, including land that was previously rezoned for the same developer several years ago for something that never came to be; to accommodate the needs of the current "unknown" company, I would urge you not to approve this requested amendment to the comprehensive plan at this time. Sin~~5~..y Y,9urs, / 1)//// -I '. ".'.///--;,"7/ .........~,_J j. ...-' /,/ '-- Jim Ballheim P.O. Box 253 Keswick, VA 22947 . , .. -.~eu...\'v-<J: Z/'''1I~L ~ z :5 ~~ I- a.. Z ~Q) Z- W -U Z(JJ <(<( a: w=> ~a.. a: ~C W<( => ~~ a:U U US:s ~ .- '0 a:U ~Q. ~'O Q.e> c: cao a:ca w~ Uo - 0 ~.- ca - ~~ _ll) ~~ a: ~U <(LL (/)'0 a:Llj ~~ m..J Cc ~o O..J 0- 00 ...J<( 3:<!l w ~ <( () '0 a. C> o ll) CJ) <.0 CO C\I " , Susan B. Chambers Rt. 14, Box 48. Charlottesville, VA-22901. 1/12/'92. Albemarle Oounth Board of Supervisors County Office Buildin~ 401 McIntyre hoad Charlottesville. VA-22901. To the Board of Supervisors, Experts have corne to advise about the growth of Charlottesville, / and Albemarle County. They advuse ap:ainst the rampaBt gr~we are ,.."\'CJ\I\..r-f"h experiencing. It must se~m wise, in the short term, to you. or, I v can't think of any other reason you are allowing it to continue. Perhaps yoa are too busy to visit the shopping centers? Bradlee's has remained vacant for a lon~ time-lon~er than it was in business, here. That'S just the most obvious example of the empty stores. To p;o "MaIling" is quite the fashion. but it seems that people aren't buyin~. Why do you 31Uppose a new enterprise. even further out in the county-would help matters1 I hear that the proposed business is one of the "Fortune 500 Oompanies". No one tells which company is interested to come here. Ma.ybe it is a desirable one, but, why not build in the existing vacant spaoes. that have already been supplied with the necessary utilities and asphalt? I souId like to know why Mr. Wendell Wood holds you in thrall? He must have gone through bankruptoy a number of times, and started failed businesses frequently. If the oompany in question is a reputable one. they are likely to need to bring thelr own tr9ined employees with them. not emplo~ local citizens. I see no reason to lessen the former charm of our onae "All American City".I believe that award was oonferred in 1978. the year before I carne here. I have watched the un~ttractive mushroom- ing of the county. the deterioration of the Downtown area. and find myself appalled by your laok of foresight. I stron~ly oppose the proposal put forth by Mr. Wood. Sincerely. s;: ~_ ?~ C C ! -v -' I. ~..../"-? RECE\VED FEB 1 8 1992 PLANNING DEPT~ 1 -fi' 6~ [,( Mil {lrf2 ,~~M~~; ~m ~J f;'lu~^, r /7 A r r ' /rf6f {MCbt?- ~ G~ ~I Mrc~ Ol\ V~ ~~J Lf (;) ( t f\. c G1-r\~I..!- ~\; {/ if. c( / I ~ RECEIVED [vv1v!fotfZ~r(J c@ ,lv'A }- )--1 () ( FEB 18 1992 (i) (. \: PLANNU~G DEPT. \/y6~ J I~_( - " It ~.i;0v1 eJl;i;d;; t/))\ ~Cr e ~ Ciuy r . ~I /) I ( 9(!(11 ('(dr~, ,- -fT--- P'( 1/\QCV1 'J ffb Ji t-lOJ/ L( (? fhO'lAfi ~ dl11lf.) I iVI ?UTi (){-- b,c L~~\ (, ~- ~/ / l( ~- 11:- to l(Mt:- ((- [vt ('yVd (g' J J ~ {( {/' rts , / rl r ;;: (eJ (/ ct/ c - t:1/', c;LX [~ f{ C{c1' {1f-d'f\ t;y. I<o~ --( - :L(_ (~~A (~~ "(1 J. Y\ ,~, 1 jt t):c/ u(Ai(I,y\ "Val /~()A0.Jf(ljytl) VA ;;LJ.- '10.5 C tl/ 7Mt /1 ~ f/;f{OO ~1't{J(iJI DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD MI:MB!:RS ON ,:( -I ~- f,.;;u 9;;{, O~;Cl~ I/:r Edward H. Bain, Jr. Samuel Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 David P. Bowerman Charlottesville Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Board of Supervisors CMCk FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, DATE: February 14, 1992 SUBJECT: Reading List for February 19, 1992 June 19, 1991 - pages 41 - end - Mr. Bowerman August 14, 1991 - pages 21 (#lld) - 31 - Mr. Bowerman September 11, 1991 - pages-1o---9---tft&t Mr. Ilai~~'- J -Pages 9 (*10) =-l.4.-=--OOr perkin~&c12..p LEN:ec Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins White Hall