HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-03-04
FIN A L
March 4, 1992
9:00 A.M.
Room 7, County Office Building
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) * Consent Agenda (on back of sheet).
6) Approval of Minutes: June 19, August 14, September 4, September 11 and
October 16, 1991.
7) Highway Matters:
a) Request to abandon Old Brown's Gap Turnpike (Route 629).
b) Discussion: 1992 Spring Preallocation Hearings for the Interstate,
Primary and Urban Systems.
c) Discussion: Traffic Light at the Colonnades (Route 654).
d) Discussion: Letter dated February 10, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt,
Resident Engineer, re: Department of Transportation's criteria for
determining locations for guard rail installation along the primary
system (from February 19, 1991).
e) Other Highway Matters.
8) Discussion: Sunset Avenue/Fontaine Avenue Connector Road.
9) Sandy Rives: Concerns re: Shenandoah National Park.
10). Report from Child and Youth Commission.
11) Robert Humphris: Report on Woodbrook Sewer Lift Station.
12) Reader Printer Lease Purchase - Clerk of the Circuit Court.
13) Sheriff's Request for Vehicle Replacement.
14) Report: Lickinghole Creek Regional Stormwater Management Facility.
15) Discussion: Road Naming Policy.
16) Discussion: Street Name Signs.
17) Access Easement - Buck's Elbow Tower Site.
18) Status Report: Southside Transfer Station.
19) Sale of McIntire School Property to McIntire Land Trust.
20) Municipal Rate Agreement - Virginia Power.
21) Discussion: Two recommendations by Chairman concerning economic and
fiscal policies related to industrial development (from February 19,
1992).
22) Appropriations:
a) Virginia Commission of the Arts Grant
b) Schools - Self-Sustaining Funds.
23) Executive Session: Personnel.
24) Certify Executive Session.
25) 3:30 p.m.. Room 5/6 - Joint Meetin~ with School Board:
a) Update - Agnor-Hurt School project and access to school.
b) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
26) Appointments.
27) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
28) Adjourn.
CON S E N T
AGE N D A
FOR APPROV.AL:
5.1 Memorandum dated February 18, 1992, from Melvin A. Breeden, Director of
Finance, requesting approval for "Destruction of Paid Tax Tickets."
5 . 2 Scottsville Tour - Board has been invitied to tour the area under
consideration for annexation by the Town of Scottsville.
FOR INFORMATION:
5.3 Letter from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, Virginia Department of
Transportation, dated February 21, 1992, stating that Lowell Pines
Subdivision road was accepted into the State Secondary System effective
February 10, 1992
5.4 Letter dated February 24, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer,
entitled "Route 866 Intersection with Route 29."
5.5 Letter dated February 25, 1992, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer,
enclosing copy of "Current Projects - Construction Schedule."
5.6 Letter dated February 26, 1992, from John G. Milliken, Secretary of
Transportation, concerning the proposed improvements to Route 29 north
of Charlottesville.
5.7 Copy of application dated February 13, 1992, from CSX Transportation
filed with the State Corporation Commission re: Request for authority to
move its agency at Charlottesville, Virginia, and the Stations Under its
Jurisdiction to the Richmond, Virginia, Transportation Service Center.
5.8 Copy of letter dated February 17, 1992, from Roger Flint, President,
CAC3, addressed to Robert Tucker, County Executive, thanking all who
participated in CAC3's achievements in making this a better community in
which to live.
5.9 Letter dated February 21, 1992, from James Christian Hill, National
Register Assistant, Department of Historic Resources, re: Merrie Mill,
Albemarle County, 02-49.
5.10 Copy of minutes of the Planning Commission for February 18, 1992.
5.11 Copy of letter dated February 20, 1992, from Virginia Roy, President,
Thomas Jefferson Planning District's Regional Recycling Group, addressed
to Charlottesville/ Albemarle Educators re: Student Environmental Forum.
5.12 Financial Management Report for December, 1991 and January, 1992.
5.13 Letter dated February 26, 1992, from J. Granger Macfarlane, Chairman,
Governor's Advisory Commission on the Dillon Rule and Local Government,
announcing a meeting and hearing schedule.
5.14 Memorandum dated February 28, 1992, from Robert W. Paskel, Division
Superintendent, entitled "Broadus Wood IDementary Construction Design."
tr
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
FROH:
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
and Community Develf~menJ
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk ~
DATE: March 5, 1992
SUBJECT: Board Actions of March 4, 1992
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on March 4, 1992, the following
actions were taken:
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
PUBLIC.
Representing the Piedmont Environmental Council, Mrs. James B. Murray spoke
concerning Agenda Item #21 (economic and fiscal policies related to industrial
development).
Mr. James Butler made a request to rename Route 640, from Cash's Corner
Store, to Route 22 as St. John Road.
Representing Citizens for Albemarle, Mr. Jack Marshall spoke concerning
Agenda Item #21 (economic and fiscal policies related to industrial development).
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Memorandum dated February 18, 1992, from Melvin A.
Breeden, Director of Finance, requesting approval for "Destruction of Paid Tax
Tickets." Authorized the Director of Finance to destroy distribution records
and paid tax tickets fram January, 1985 through June, 1986, in accordance with
Virginia State Library and Archives Record Retention and Disposition Schedule.
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Scottsville Tour - Board has been invited to tour the
area under consideration for annexation by the Town of Scottsville. There was
no discussion on this item, so I assume the Board plans to take the tour.
, .
Date:
Page 2
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
March 5, 1992
Memo To:
Agenda Item No. 5.6. Letter dated February 26, 1992, from John G. Milli-
ken, Secretary of Transportation, concerning the proposed improvements to Route
29 north of Charlottesville. The Chairman will send a letter to Secretary
Milliken asking for a clarification of the last sentence in the fourth paragraph
of his letter relative to the interchanges. The Board asked if this statement
refers to the design of the interchanges or the future chance of having inter-
changes. It is my understanding that the County Executive will draft the
letter.
Agenda Item No. 5.7. Copy of application dated February 13, 1992, from CSX
Transportation filed with the State Corporation Commission re: Request for
authority to move its agency at Charlottesville, Virginia, and the Stations
Under its Jurisdiction to the Richmond, Virginia, Transportation Service Center.
The staff to provide additional information at the March 11 meeting.
Agenda Item No. 5.8. Copy of letter dated February 17, 1992, from Roger
Flint, President, CAC3, addressed to Robert Tucker, County Executive, thanking
all who participated in CAC3's achievements in making this a better community in
which to live. The Board commended Mr. Flint for his role in the development of
CAC3. I will order a Certificate of Appreciation to be presented to him on
April 1, 1992, if that is okay.
Agenda Item No. 5.13. Letter dated February 26, 1992, from J. Granger
Macfarlane, Chairman, Governor's Advisory Commission on the Dillon Rule and
Local Government, announcing a meeting and hearing schedule. The Board to
discuss further at the March 11 meeting.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matters: Request to abandon Old Brown's Gap
Turnpike (Route 629). Consensus of the Board that should the defendants drop
their suit against the county, then they can go through the normal procedures
and bring a request back to the Board.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Discussion: 1992 Spring Preallocation Hearings for
the Interstate, Primary and Urban Systems. The following comments were made
regarding the projects to be considered by the Board in their comments for the
VDoT Preallocation Hearing on March 31:
1. Include in the statement a request that when the Commonwealth Transporta-
tion Board reduces an estimate based on actual costs that the estimated
funds remain in the budget.
2. In the staff1s first recommendation, set out a list of the CATS projects
that are eligible for the Primary Program.
3. The staff to look at moving #6 (widen Route 250 West from Emmett Street to
Route 637 in Ivy) faster through the process, possibly through phases, but
not at the detriment of projects ahead of it.
.
Memo To:
Date:
Page 3
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
March 5, 1992
4. Staff to consider if any of the County's primary projects could be included
in the General Assembly's Transportation Bond Issue.
Agenda Item No. 7c. Discussion: Traffic Light at the Colonnades (Route
654). No discussion. Copy of letter sent to Mr. Eitelberg.
Agenda Item No. 7d. Discussion: Letter dated February 10, 1992, from D.
S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, re: Department of Transportation's criteria
for determining locations for guard rail installation along the primary system
(from February 19, 1991). Mr. Roosevelt to provide the Board with an update on
traffic information on Route 240 in Crozet.
Agenda Item No. 7e. Other Highway Matters. There were none.
Agenda Item No.8. Discussion: Sunset Avenue/Fontaine Avenue Connector
Road. The Board determined that a connector between Sunset Avenue and Fontaine
Avenue is not feasible and that it should not be pursued further.
Agenda Item No.9. Sandy Rives: Concerns re: Shenandoah National Park.
Received, no action.
Agenda Item No. 10. Report from Child and Youth Commission. Mrs. Humphris
suggested that in the annual report, the first item under list of Accomplish-
ments, set out the entire list of public and private youth serving agencies/
organizations and their descriptions.
Agenda Item No. 11. Robert Humphris: Report on Woodbrook Sewer Lift
Station. Hr. Bowerman asked if there is no other private development in this
basin area, if that would prevent adjoining property owners from being able to
connect to the line and/or prevent the station from being upgraded. He also
asked if there is anything else that can be done to relieve this situation.
Agenda Item No. 12. Reader Printer Lease Purchase - Clerk of the Circuit
Court. Approved a request from the Clerk of the Circuit Court to enter into a
five-year lease purchase arrangement for four microfilm reader printers as
outlined on the attached description.
Agenda Item No. 13. Sheriff's Request for Vehicle Replacement. Authorized
the Sheriff to purchase a full-size police cruiser, under present state con-
tract, at a price of $12,181 to replace a 1989 Cavalier, with the understanding
that the Cavalier will be placed in General Government's motor pool to replace a
vehicle which currently has in excess of 100,000 miles on the odometer.
.
Memo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
March 5, 1992
Date:
Page 4
Agenda Item No. 14. Report: Lickinghole Creek Regional Stormwater Manage-
ment Facility. Authorized the staff to move forward.
Agenda Item No. 15. Discussion: Road Naming Policy.
Approved a request from a citizen to rename Route 640, from Cash's Corner
Store to Route 22 as St. John Road.
Renamed Route 53, from its intersection at Route 20, along its entire
length in Albemarle County to the Fluvanna County line, as the Thomas Jefferson
Parkway.
Retained the Road Name Policy (adopted on September 11, 1991) outlining
procedures for requests to change adopted road names.
Agenda Item No. 16. Discussion: Street Name Signs. Consensus to accept
the attached Street Name Sign Requirements for Albemarle County, Virginia, dated
1 February, 1992, as guidance to be included in the Street Name Ordinance
manual.
Agenda Item No. 17. Access Easement - Buck's Elbow Tower Site. Authorized
the Chairman to sign the attached letter regarding access to the Buck's Elbow
Tower site.
Agenda Item No. 18. Status Report: Southside Transfer Station. To be
reviewed further in 60 days.
Agenda Item No. 19. Sale of McIntire School Property to McIntire Land
Trust. Deferred to March 11. Requested the County Attorney to bring back
information on how extensive and the cost of the research to find out if Resolu-
tion Trust Corporation has been challenged. Also, what is the percentage of
interest this schedule would provide, if the County agrees with the repayment?
Agenda Item No. 20. Municipal Rate Agreement - Virginia Power. Authorized
the County Executive to execute the Virginia Power Agreement for IT 92, 93 and
94 as outlined in the attached memorandum from VACo.
Agenda Item No. 21. Discussion: Two recommendations by Chairman concern-
ing economic and fiscal policies related to industrial development (from Febru-
ary 19, 1992). To be discussed at a work session on March 11 at 5:00 p.m., Room
/17 .
Agenda Item No. 22a. Appropriation: Virginia Commission of the Arts
Grant. Approved. Original form sent to Melvin Breeden.
.
Date:
Page 5
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
March 5, 1992
Memo To:
Agenda Item No. 22b. Appropriation: Schools - Self-Sustaining Funds.
Approved. Original forms sent to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 25a. Update - Agnor-Hurt School project and access to
school. Received, no action.
Agenda Item No. 25b. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
budget work session on the School budget, requested information on
pool and how it works; how vesting affects employees on the steps;
tance of the four percent vs. five percent pool and how the Career
For the
the merit
the impor-
Ladder works.
Agenda Item No. 26. Appointments.
APPOINTED Mrs. Diane Edgerton Miller to the Architectural Review Board, to
replace Patricia Bower, with said term to expire on November 11, 1992.
REAPPOINTED Ms. Norma Diehl to the Public Recreational Facilities
Authority, with said term to expire on December 13, 1994.
APPOINTED Mr. Ricardo Preve to the Public Recreational Facilities
Authority, to replace Archibald Craige, with said term to expire on December 13,
1994.
APPOINTED Mr. Gerald Dixon and Mr. Paul Tompkins to the Milton Airport
Citizens Advisory Committee.
APPOINTED Mr. David A. Moyer to the Albemarle County Service Authority as
the White Hall representative, with said term to expire on April 16, 1996.
REAPPOINTED Mr. Hollis Lumpkin to the Albemarle County Service Authority as
the Scottsville representative, with said term to expire on April 16, 1996.
APPOINTED Ms. Betty Newell to the JAUNT Board, with said term to expire on
September 30, 1994.
Requested the Clerk to readvertise for applicants for the Children & Youth
Commission.
Agenda Item No. 27. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
The Board decided to appeal the Bargamin vs. Board of County Supervisors
decision. Must be done by Friday, Karch 6.
The Board accepted an invitation to tour the Charlottesville-Albemarle
Airport on the Kay day meeting during lunch.
There will be a Greenwood Citizens Council meeting on Karch 5 at Emmanuel
Episcopal Church concerning the Greenwood Chemical site.
.
Date:
Page 6
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
March 5, 1992
Memo To:
The Board will meet with Charlottesville City Council on March 13; cur-
rently there is no agenda for that meeting.
PACC-Tech to work officially with the TJPDC staff. Ms. Nancy O'Brien will
attend PACC meetings.
The Board asked how it could accept a proffer from Wendell Wood for 6000
lineal feet of open space along the Rivanna River.
Agricultural/Forestal Advisory Committee - This committee is not currently
working on any of the strategies in the Comp Plan. Was that the point of Mrs.
Humphris question?
There will be a rededication of the Rescue Squad Building on Berkmar Drive
soon.
LEN:ec
Attachments
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
Robert B. Brandenburger
Roxanne White
Amelia Patterson
Jo Higgins
Bruce Woodzell
.
STREET NAME SIGN REQUIREMENTS
FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
1 February 1992
SHAPE
Horizontal Rectangle
COLOR
street Name Sign
Message White on Green Field (Reflectorized)
Route Decal
Message Black on White Field (Non-reflectorized)
Block Number
Message White on Green Field (Reflectorized)
MATERIAL I
FEATURES
- High Intensity Reflectorized Sheeting (Double Faced)
- 0.100 Gauge Flat Aluminum Sign Blank
- Blank space in lower right hand corner for
Route Decal
- Blank space in upper right hand corner for
Block Number
SIZE
Local/Subdivision
Primary/Collector
Horizontal
Vertical
28" to 46" max
8" min
30" min to 48" max
9" min
Route Decal
Space
8" x 1.25"
12" x 2.5"
Block Number
Space
8" x 2.5"
12" x 3"
MESSAGE Prefix Capitals 2"C 3"C
Name Capitals 5"C 6"C
Suffix Capitals 2"C 3"C
Route Decal l"C min 2"C
Block No. Decal 2"C min 3"C
.
5 YEAR LEASE PURCHASE
LEASE PAYMENT OF $1,009.00 PER MONTH FOR 60 MONTHS FOR A TOTAL
COST OF $60,540.00, OR $15,135.00 PER UNIT.
SPECIAL PURCHASE PRICE 12,734.00
2,401.00 FINANCE CHARGE UNDER LEASE
WE PURCHASED THIS SAME UNIT IN 1989 AT A COST OF APPROXIMATELY
$19,000.00. THE SPECIAL PRICE IS FOR THE LEASE PURCHASE OF FOUR
MACHINES.
SINCE THE CLERK'S OFFICE IS A SELF SUPPORTING OFFICE THE MACHINES
CAN PAY FOR THEMSELVES:
To make payback on new reader-printers:
Amount per print now charged to patrons
Print cost to Circuit Court
.25
.02
Profit per print
.23
Year 1
No maintenance cost, equipment has 12 month
warranty:
Lease payment for four (4) units
Divided by profit per print
1,009.00
: .23
Total copies needed to pay lease
4,387 prints
Dividing this figure (4,387) between the four machines, means
that each unit would have to produce only 1,097 copies per month
to pay for themselves.
WE ALSO HAVE THE OPTION OF INCREASING THE FEE CHARGED FOR THESE
COPIES, ALTHOUGH WE CURRENTLY ARE AVERAGING AROUND $3,000 MONTHLY
IN REVENUE FOR COPIES MADE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE.
~, ~
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
March 6, 1992
Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
Department of Transportation
PO Box 2013
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Roosevelt:
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on March 4, 1992, the following
actions were taken:
Agenda Item No. 5.6. Letter dated February 26, 1992, from John G. Milli-
ken, Secretary of Transportation, concerning the proposed improvements to Route
29 north of Charlottesville. The Chairman will send a letter to Secretary
Milliken asking for a clarification of the last sentence in the fourth para-
graph of his letter relative to the interchanges. The Board asked if this
statement refers to the design of the interchanges or the future chance of
having interchanges.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matters: Request to abandon Old Brown's Gap
Turnpike (Route 629). Consensus of the Board that should the defendants drop
their suit against the county, then they can go through the normal procedures
and bring a request back to the Board.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Discussion: 1992 Spring Preallocation Hearings for
the Interstate, Primary and Urban Systems. The following comments were made
regarding the projects to be considered by the Board in their comments for the
VDoT Preallocation Hearing on March 31:
1. Include in the statement a request that when the Commonwealth Transporta-
tion Board reduces an estimate based on actual costs that the estimated
funds remain in the budget.
2. In the staff's first recommendation, set out a list of the CATS projects
that are eligible for the Primary Program.
Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt
March 6, 1992
Page 2.
3. The staff to look at moving #6 (widen Route 250 West from Emmett Street to
Route 637 in Ivy) faster through the process, possibly through phases, but
not at the detriment of projects ahead of it.
4. Staff to consider if any of the County's primary projects could be included
in the General Assembly's Transportation Bond Issue.
Agenda Item No. 7c. Discussion: Traffic Light at the Colonnades (Route
654). No discussion.
Agenda Item No. 7d. Discussion: Letter dated February 10, 1992, from D.
S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, re: Department of Transportation's criteria
for determining locations for guard rail installation along the primary system
(from February 19, 1991). Mr. Roosevelt to provide the Board with an update on
traffic information on Route 240 in Crozet.
Agenda Item No.8. Discussion: Sunset Avenue/Fontaine Avenue Connector
Road. The Board determined that a connector between Sunset Avenue and Fontaine
Avenue is not feasible and that it should not be pursued further.
~Y7~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
LEN:ec
->
..
f'~~. /t"~''''>. r":'\r\~'r
( ." "\ " ,.,,), ,; , ::.: ~ . t! i
~ n !, ~ '. ',' ~,; ::,3 ! \1"
1 ","."' '. '. ~" ~ i\. . ../
,\ ~\"'~"-'
'h'19,Jn~
u ~ ~. U
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
MEMORANDUM
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
TO:
Melvin
FROM:
Lettie
Breeden, Director of ~nance
E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
DATE: March 5, 1992
SUBJECT: Appropriation Requests
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on March 4, 1992, the
Board approved the following appropriation requests:
Form #910039 - to reflect a $300 grant received from the
Virginia Commission of the Arts for Stony Point Elementary
School;
From #910036 - to allow the expenditure of $17,063.58 from
the Fund Balance to support textbook purchases anticipated in FY
91-92;
From #910037 - to allow the expenditure of the remaining
portion of a grant from the G. E. Elfun Society in the amount of
$14,633.05; and
Form #9l0038 - to allow the expenditure of the remaining
portion of a Process Approach Learning Grant and Title II Program
Grant in the amount of $26,590.
Attached are signed appropriation forms to reflect these
actions.
Attachments
LEN:ec
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Robert W. paskel
Tracy Holt
"
...
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910038
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
"
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
FUND
PAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION FOR FY 91/92 PROCESS APPROACH LEARNING GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1320361101160300 INSTRUCTIONAL STIPENDS $10,972.00
1320361101210000 FICA 872.00
1320361101601300 INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 7,200.00
1320361311312500 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,937.00
1320361311550400 TRAVEL-EDUCATION 1,215.00
1320361311580000 MISC 534.00
1320361311600100 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 260.00
1320361311601700 PRINTING & BINDING 600.00
TOTAL
$26,590.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2320324000240500 GRANT REVENUE-STATE $12,930.00
2320333000330008 GRANT REVENUE-FEDERAL 13,660.00
TOTAL
$26,590.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER: SCHOOLS
APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~~~ ,..R -2?- 5' ~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 3-57'~
~
.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910037
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
G E ELFUN GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION TO USE REMAINING FUND BALANCE.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1320461311601300 INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES $14,633.05
TOTAL
$14,633.05
REVENUE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2320451000510100
APP. FROM FUND BALANCE
$14,633.05
TOTAL
$14,633.05
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER: SCHOOLS
APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~~~ ...::? - ~ '7....?Z
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 3-~ f?.?--'
. ...
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910036
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
TEXTBOOK
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION TO USE REMAINING FUND BALANCE.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1340063070601200 TEXTBOOK EXPENSES $17,063.58
TOTAL
$17,063.58
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2340051000510100 APP. FROM FUND BALANCE $17,063.58
TOTAL
$17,063.58
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
SCHOOLS
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
V~L~
.,.? -..2 7~ 92-
,::? --6.-;;;; .?--
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
....
..
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910039
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION TO EXPENDED FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE VA COMM OF THE ARTS.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1221161101800100 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $300.00
TOTAL
$300.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2200024000240423
VA COMM OF THE ARTS
$300.00
TOTAL
$300.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
SCHOOLS
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~~L
..? - ::z 7-,7.::2-
3-6-/2-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
.. ""
~/~~?fI~y- fr?// ~ ?- ~)9-2--
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ~
Protecting The Environment Is Everybody's Business
March 4, 1992
Mr. Chairman, members of the Board:
I am Mrs. James B. Murray and I am speaking on behalf of the Piedmont
Environmental Council. Item number 21 on your agenda is a Board discussion of two
recommendations by the Chairman relating to economic development and fiscal
analysis. I am not here to speak to the substance of this item, but on behalf of the PEC
I would like to raise a procedural question with respect to the recommendation
regarding economic development.
The PEC believes that the proposal described in the "Agenda Item Executive
Summary" relating to "Economic Development Site Overview", if pursued, would
represent a de facto amendment of current Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan
provisions regarding "Economic Development." The proposal clearly describes a
program for the active involvement of the County government in soliciting new industry
to locate in the County.
The current Comprehensive Plan specifically states as the County's goal for economic
development the following:
"Allow expansion of industry at the rate generated by the private
sector to accommodate that rate and type of economic growth which is
consistent with other Comprehensive Plan goals.
"...an 'active' economic development policy is not recommended."
Agenda item 21 represents a rather significant amendment of this Comprehensive
Plan goal and we believe that action on that part of agenda item 21 pertaining to
economic development should be pursued as any other amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan. This would require at least the following:
1. A resolution of intent to amend the plan.
2. Formal notice to the public.
3. The development of a specific proposal for public review.
4. Public hearings before the Planning Commission and this Board.
Thank you.
28-C Main Street, Box 460, Warrenton, Virginia 22186/703-347-2334/Fax 349-9003
1010 Harris Street, Suite 1, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901/804-977-2033
.
,If:)
i b'
nD \\7
tJ ,(
i
\'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
401 MciNTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901-4596
FROM:
Melvin A. Breeden, Director If F\nance
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC ~
March 23, 1992
MEMO TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Destruction of Paid Tax Tickets
Your request of February 18, 1992, to destroy approximately 43
cubic feet of distribution records (including paid tax tickets)
for the period January 1985 through June 1986, was approved by the
Board of Supervisors at its meeting on March 4, 1992.
len/
Djstdbli.t~ to Board: Z' ~"~ J) ?;: .
A"end'" Item No '/2 ,02(L'f( s, J )
1'16 u ;; . --,,,",, ""'" .,'.'""-::i.t.:..,.'
OF ^lR~';\^''i 't.'
COUNTY t." !..>t:_I.'J\i1.....
;~'': ~. .' ~t h '~,.':L,.i...
:""
." , FEB 20 lqq? \
~.\- J
ri: . .."..f
'-, ~~";'''';;f''~-'~.i,.'--''._,:;
i \i ~,;:;<~ ~~;1 ,.--::f:::,;..i ,,:' }d'" ~:'i<~
EXCCUTiVE OFfICE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
. ,'~'\ j~LE:
I ,
~
I
['
.......i.'T.ll
\ I I ! I
../! ilJ
_ i..
..\ I......
.~)O~S
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
February 18, 1992
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Destruction of Paid Tax Tickets
According to the Virginia state Library and Archives Record
Retention and Disposition Schedule paid tax tickets may be
destroyed five years after audit and upon petitioning the governing
body for authorization. There is approximately 43 cubic feet of
distribution records (which include paid tax tickets) from January
1985 through June 1986 located in the Finance Storage Room in the
basement.
I would appreciate your assistance in presenting this to the
Board for authorization to destroy these records. If you need any
further information please contact Brenda Sprouse.
s
DATE
~
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
41 (1LJ;c2
fI~,IY1d1{S, ;2)
~t {h IAlk )nvL/
fA IlLrUc II
,
Form. 3
7/25/86
Distributed to Board: 2',(' [, '/ Z
!\gena;, Itam No. y/, ~~c; r(~3 )
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGIN~~ 1(\'"""'" i":::- ;\d3EMl~,Rlt
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COU \4 \ , \"',..- ~." p,-;::::: .-r;~
1401 EAST BROAD STREET ~-::~ r'("' r;:': ,\~' ~ '" ~"_:. ;",~ \ \ \
RICHMOND, 23219 \ \\\ \ ).", ' \, ~ \
\ 1'" . II
February 21, 1992 ;,\ FF" ~:;1cq? ),\~\
,,\ , .. -,-' 1.- \ \.) \
I 'i~ \ l~'~~~"",~ OJ \... r 'U \~Il ~J
I p ,\ ,., ,\' , " " .., S
:BOI:~',~D'''Ot S'lJ,fERVISOl1
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
Secondary System
Addition
Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
40l McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 2290l
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD:
As requested in your resolution dated January 8, 1992, the following
addition to the Secondary System of Albemarle County is hereby approved,
effective February 10, 1992.
ADDITION
LOWELL PINES
Route l563 (Stanley Drive) - From Route 743 to 0.14 mile
Southeast Route 743
Sincerely,
~~~~
Commissioner
c c ? /. ~ '! ,0'0 _
E nJ ("L.€.0L~ ^ J
~rYU-~ J
/) 8--.u- ~.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 5T CENTURY
LENGTH
0.l4 Mi
C:t"H.) f ,j"',/ ("'\ r. I!. ' t;~... ~ IIAfll'Y
-.. " . I . ..I! I-\L~A:'';f , t.
~. ";, '\:" r. n n i ".:':' r;-\
'-<"'r~""", ''''''lot. j r ~;
" ;; 1,:
, I't
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA l\. ;;~llli
@5()i\.(~Q OF ~~~~H~.Ff'\W I.SD~S
Distributed to Beard: ". ,~)'> ('
Agenda Item No. ;~/7 ( /::5:. -;' ( .<; , )
# ~
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902
D, S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
February 24, 1992
Route 866 Intersection
Vith Route 29
Mr. David P. Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Bowerman:
Reference is made to the Greenbrier/Route 29 intersection which was a subject of
discussion at the November 1991 Board of Supervisors' day meeting. As a result of the
Board's discussion, we met with members of the Senior Center, Brookmill Homeowners
Association and the Branchlands Property Owners Association on November 25, 1991. I have
discussed with our District Traffic Engineer information and suggestions obtained from both
meetings. This letter is my report on our joint review of the intersection.
The Greenbrier/Route 29 intersection is part of a coordinated signal system which
involves all of the signals between Hydraulic Road on the south and Voodbrook on the north.
Of the eight intersections involved in that system, the Greenbrier intersection is the only
one carrying heavy volumes and having only two lanes each direction along Route 29. In
effect the Greenbrier intersection controls the maximum volume of traffic which can move
along Route 29. It functions like the narrowest part of an hourglass. To maximize the
amount of traffic which moves along Route 29 we have had to extend the green time for Route
29 beyond that allowed at other major signalized intersections. This reduces the amount of
green time available for the side street (Greenbrier). Vhile other major intersections have
protected movements for left turns from the side street, sufficient time is not available at
the Greenbrier intersection to do this. Programming separate left turn and through movements
for Greenbrier would subtract at least four seconds from the amount of time now available for
Greenbrier traffic in order to insert a caution phase unless the green time is reduced for
Route 29 traffic. Based upon our observations of the intersection and the review of accident
data, we cannot justify reducing the amount of green time allocated to Route 29. It,
therefore, appears unfeasible to add a protected left turn movement for the Greenbrier
traffic.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
, ..
Mr. David P. Bowerman
Route 866 Intersection with Route 29
Page 2
February 24, 1992
One of the problems brought to our attention at the November meeting at the Senior
Center was the intimidation which is occurring as left turn traffic from each direction on
Greenbrier enters the intersection. Ye believe this problem can be alleviated by guiding
left turn traffic through the intersection. Dashed pavement making can be used for this
purpose. Pavement marking of this nature is in place at the Hydraulic Road intersection on
Route 29. Marking will be placed to guide left turns through the intersection as soon as
weather conditions and manpower will permit.
Ye will continue to monitor this intersection in the future, however, I do not believe
additional improvements can occur until Route 29 is reconstructed in 1994.
Yours truly,
:D, S~e-e~ (l(Lr~.
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DSR/smk
a tt achmen t
cc: Miss Lettie E. Neher
J. C. DuFresne
J. H. Shifflett
K. Y. Staton
OiS'Ji.Juted to Board: (/ Z (, t '!' )
~--
Agenua Item No. _(?Z,{jc.:/( s', ')
--
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
. COUNTYOFA e'I"
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA ~!'::"l.I; It..'f.....':'.;') r,.,.:' '-'. .....:.:..::~
11 ,.~,.....L,...l ....,~
f ,.>" ' , ',i "r ,.....j
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . Ul . .' '\ II i
P. O. BOX 2013 . t1j \ f:r-!~ ~':!; iI' P"l. l :
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902 U1 , 1" '. . '.' '..' '., D.' .' .lY..a. O.OS~ ....
i L l.:~:'F;','." RESI~E~T,~~~lr
:_ ...' ~. '--I ",~:__.iL:" . L, I 1,-., t if
February 25, 1992 E3(jA!~D OF Ci ; ,..... -
-' ..J Ct \;1 i ~:: lj it 9:.
Current Projects
Construction Schedule
Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Miss Neher:
Attached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently
under construction in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is
forwarded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this
matter with them at the next meeting if they so desire.
Yours truly,
~ A- ~-:Y~H~~~L V
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DSR/smk
attachment
cc: R. W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
~
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
MARCH 1, 1992
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
IROUTE I LOCATION STATUS EST.COMP I
INO. I DATE I
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I I
I 250 I ST. CLAIR AVE. TO RTE. 64 CONSTRUCTION 28% COMPLETE SEP 93
I I
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
* REVISED DATE
** NEW PROJECT
""
.....
"~
r--.".-
r.-j
.
i
r
r
t
,~ ,.".
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
March 10, 1992
Forrest R Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
The Honorable John G. Milliken
Secretary of Transportation
Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board
607 9th Street Office Building
RiChmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Secretary Milliken:
I am writing to request clarification of your recent response on
the Route 29 North grade separated interchanges at Rio Road,
Hydraulic Road, and Greenbrier Drive.
It has been the County's understanding from earlier correspondence
on these issues that the necessity for these grade separated
interchanges has been agreed upon by the County, the Department of
Transportation and the Commonwealth Transportation Board. The only
unresolved issues were the specific designs, the availability of
funding and when they would be constructed in the sequence as
outlined in the CTB resolution of December 19, 1991 and your letter
of November 4, 1991.
The necessity for clarification is the language of your February
26, 1992 letter in which you make reference to these as "proposed
improvements" and "After the location and design public hearings,
the Commonwealth Transportation Board will make its decision on the
future developments of the interchanges (emphasis added). This
could be construed that the necessity for the interchanges is not
agreed upon but will be decided at a future date.
The County's position has always been that these grade separated
interchanges are critical to maintaining an acceptable level of
service on Route 29 North and that the Department and CTB agree.
In view of your recent letter, I request clarification of the
Commonwealth Transportation Board position on their commitment to
these improvements.
J1-"-.
The Honorable John G. Milliken
March 10, 1992
Page 2
I appreciate your assistance and make this request to avoid any
misunderstandings.
Sincerely,
{j)mkn~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/dbm
92.009
cc: Mr. Ray D. Pethtel
Ms. Constance R. Kincheloe
r-..
"-
"
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
John G. Milliken
Secretary of Transportallon
Office of the Governor
Richmond 23219
(804) 786-8032
TOO (804) 786-7765
November 4, 1991
The Honorable F. R. Bowie
Chairman, Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
401'Kclntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Dear Chairman Bowie:
This letter is intended to reply in more detail to your
letter of August 1. The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB)
is committed to the sequence of construction as set forth in the
CTB's November 15, 1990, resolution.
The CATS Plan is an approved Plan for the Charlottesville _
Albemarle County area and it is the intent of the Department and
the CTB to carry out that Plan as funding on the primary system
becomes available. To keep the Plan on schedule, however, it
will be necessary for the City of Charlottesville to keep its
projects at a high priority and for Albemarle County to schedule
the secondary projects in the CATS Plan.
It was never the intent of the CTB or the Department that
the CATS Plan not be carried out as currently proposed, provided
funding was available. However, the Department and the CTB
believe that a Route 29 Bypass is an integral and important part
of the regional transportation plan and will be needed in the
future, even with the implementation of the CATS Plan.
with those general comments in mind, I would like to review
the status of the three phases included in the CTB's November 15,
1990, resolution which were also addressed in your letter of
August 1.
Phase I. Short-ranqe Recommendations: The widening of Existing
Route 29 to six lanes with continuous right-turn lanes from the
Route 250 Bypass to the South Fork of the Rivanna River will be
accomplished by two projects as shown on Page 38 (Items 3 and 4)
of the 1991-92 Six-Year Improvement Program. The first project
from the Route 250 Bypass to Rio Road is scheduled for
construction in July 1993 and the second project, from Rio Road
to the river, is scheduled for advertisement in July 1994, all
subject to available funding. The design work is currently
underway.
,...
,
The Honorable F. R. Bowie'
November 4, 1991
Page Three
2. The remainder of Phase I contained in the
CTB's resolution of November 15, 1990.
3. The completion of the Meadowcreek- Parkway
from the Route 250 Bypass to Route 29 north
as urban and secondary road funding becomes
available for the facility'S right-of~way
acquisition and construction cost.
4. The construction of the interchanges on Route
29 north at Rio Road, HYdraulic.Road and
Greenbrier Drive as traffic dema2ids and
funding permits. -
5. The preservation and acquisition of ~ight-
of~way for-Alternative 10. This will be-
accomplished as funding is available for this
established corridor's right-of-way
acquisition and construction.
In closing, I trust that this letter assures the County of
the Department's and the Commonwealth Transportation Board's
commitment to the construction of the CATS Plan and that the
County will assist the Department in preserving right-of-way for
the approved corridor for the Route 29 Bypass.
If the contents of this letter meet with your approval and
if the County wishes to move forwa1d with the preservation of
necessary right-Of-way, I would be pleased to bring the attached
draft resolution before the CTB fo its concfirrence.
,/ sin erely,
L .~ ;1// / 0~^J_____
ohn G. Jf liken
JGM/cmg
Attachment
cc: Ms. Constance R. Kincheloe
Mr. Ray D. Pethtel
Richard L. Walton, Jr., Esquire
,r ,
~
Moved by Mrs. Kincheloe
Seconded by Mr. Davies , that
WHEREAS, in accordance with the statutes of the Commonwealth
of Virginia and policies of the Commonwealth Transportation
Board, the Commonwealth Transportation Board by resolution dated
-November 15, 1990, approved the location of Project 6029-002-122,
PE-lOO in three phases; and
WHEREAS, the three phases provided for short range, medium
range, and long range recommendations for the construction of. the
project in conjunction with other projects in the city of
Charlottesville and Albemarle County; and
WHEREAS, by letter dated August 1, 1991, the Albemarle
County Board of Supervisors has requested that this Board take
positive steps to commit to the priorities which were set forth
in the Board's resolution of November 15, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Board believes that the orderly development and
funding of the various projects in accordance with the three
phases as set forth in the Board's resolution of November 15,
1990, is in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the Board recognizes that state and local
transportation priorities should be harmonized where possible;
and
WHEREAS, it is the sense of this Board that the Department
of Transportation adhere to the schedule of improvements as set
forth in the November 15, 1990, resolution; and
-2-
..
-"'} :'
Distributed to Soard: . c (. ( , 'w--
Agenda Hem tlJ.
i..' :
,>;
John G. Milliken
Secretary 0' Transportation
Office of the Governor
Richmond 23219
"'"\.... ,
vOUNTY Oc.- A r-
r.::-:-- .. I . IlPt" '''lIe
I rl! t ..-.; ...-.~ f...) _!';lll"{r("/ ~
; I J.li.:..L!:.::J:::::.:(fC:~G.;.I.,ni :.:.:, r..:...t;
I.,' ~("",.' ,n
",' '" j II,
; ,; ! Frq ..~I'i 199" \ Ii /i'
j i : I',,' ", ~ . ( )' iJ
.J : 1.1 .\ -"';,,,. I' , i
,.... -...:..1 , ."..;..1..1....'1" __..;' 1.1)1 I.
.... ~.".. . j' " "I
;;;:.0:. no ") ',,,, L:''', 11 .
',,1 t F st ~. -,.j l,_J
. '- }tJr." I/I'~
.. \ v ,'000
(804) 786-8032 . , .\....,
TOO (804) 786-7765
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
February 26, 1992
The Honorable David P. Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Dear Chairman Bowerman:
Thank you for your recent letter regarding the proposed
improvements to Route 29 north of Charlottesville.
The improvements to provide grade separated interchanges at
Rio Road, Hydraulic Road and Greenbrier Drive are not currently
funded for preliminary design or right-of-way acquisition.
The Culpeper District Pre-allocation Hearing has been
scheduled for March 31 at 10:00 a.m. at the Virginia Department
of Transportation (VDOT) Culpeper District office to hear
requests for additions and revisions to VDOT's Six-Year
Improvement Program. The Board's formal request for the
interchanges should be made at this hearing.
Once funding becomes available and the preliminary designs
for the interchanges are completed, a location and design public
hearing will be held to receive comments from the general public.
! am told that the public h8aring in 1986 on Route 29~ which
included the Rio Road interchange, brought out opposition from
some adjacent property owners. After the location and design
public hearing, the Commonwealth Transportation Board will make
its decision on the future development of the interchanges.
In the meantime, VDOT intends to proceed with the design and
construction of the recently approved project. This project
includes six through lanes, continuous right turn lanes and
signalized at-grade intersections.
The Honorable David P. Bowerman
February 26, 1992
Page Two
I appreciate the continued cooperation of Albemarle County
in these complex matters.
Sin erel~' J
, f vitti ~,~+--"--
6nn G. illiken
JGM/mwc
cc: Mr. Ray D. Pethtel
Ms. Constance R. Kincheloe
DEFERRED UNTIL
McuU\ 4- I I c; i .,:L
q 1..,07 () 'I (5) 7 )
6~ Nt ~ ~ /21~.Gn,~
fA (jf~ {/ I (91)..
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
<Jo (/V),/.J Ci---e~JA -It ~ ~~-
Form.3
7/25/86
~-
February 17,1992
~3
Mr. Robert Tucker, County Executive
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va 22901
Dear Bob,
Distributed to Board: _ ,,: (,' J ' 'l L.;
Agenda Item No. _ LJ2'~f5: ~)
,'; u i'~ 'TV C F' , ,'.~ ~:~\/' iI, f~ L l
1
,I
t
: .:
.'
~!, U:....L?:: . ..
,)\~il' FFR
i \
i \....
iU _ (.:'.;"~
WARD Cf '~)..
~::" '''''. ':.:( 'J
;; I!
. .
, :..:::.J
_ . \. './ ',~.. !)~S
As you are aware, CAC-3 is merging into the Rivanna Solid
Waste Authority. While existing in one form or another since 1971,
undoubtedly the most effective and busiest years of our existence
were those spent in the County Office Building.
It was during this period that local interest in recycling
reached a crescendo, with CAC-3 as the only functioning recycling
information and program center in our community. Much of the
credit for our effectiveness can be credited to the support and
cooperation of your organization. In addition to yourself, leading
the list of those enablers we specifically wish to acknowledge are
our hosts in the Parks and Recreation Department, the Board of
Supervisors, and the departments of Finance, Zoning, and Staff
Services.
Please convey our thanks to all
their share in CAC-3 I S achievements
c;,ommUfiity..,in which to live.
, \
Respec:tfully,
i
j
~_#'---'-...... /
,../ . ""X
Rogfi!r,Fl1n'1:'I
~ent
in your administration for
in making this a better
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
".'."i....
}' '~}.
'-.',
\~ b
" ~.'.'
Ji .1l
t.~ ~
~ ~
r" .~
~:-,(ci~
,
h
EXE(;UTl~iE OffiCE
Charlottesville - Albemarle Clean Community Commission
..~." ,.. " , . . ........ ..... ,.~'~"'.l~., ~.L." Co ....... ~~ ._ o. .. .~.......~~...... ~ ~.....~ -- .~-" ... ~~ ...
,... ... ... _".~.., __..".__~__ .." . " ~ '" , . . ~ .. ..~"" ~o' ._......
P. Q. Box 922 Charlottesville, Va. 22902 ( 804) 972 4020
Distributed to Soard:
~ c//J, ,) c:-
'"
Hugh C. Miller, Director
COU:~i:~?~~ ALBEMARLE.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI,)-"'~f::';::'.L:?QIL[7.f):::-' "'il'
Department of Historic Resources 1'1\'~ /"i' ~ ~@q~;)~4) iii1S; ~9~~:1
221 Governor Street L j 'j_ Telephone (S04) tf3~ 143
February 21, 1992 R~chmond. VlfgInla 23219 JL!:~ ~.:~ ;.~~Ai<~'(~r+, :.._-4kfj
BOARD 0'" (:' I\_'_~. ...~..f~
r- uU,-u-<v'ISOqS
Agenda !t.m No. {/j, (;;.,dJ ~) )
.." ./
David P. Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, V A 22901
RE: Merrie Mill, Albemarle County, 02-49
Dear Mr. Bowerman:
At its February 18 meeting, the State Review Board determined that the above-referenced
property appears to meet the criteria for listing on the Virginia Landmarks Register and the
National Register of Historic Places. The staff of the Department of Historic Resources does
not plan to prepare the national register nomination which is the required next step in the
registration process, as our work program is fully scheduled for the remainder of the year and
we normally limit our preparation of nominations to those properties for which the Department
is accepting an easement.
Should the preparation of a nomination go forward you will be notified prior to any formal
action by the Department or the Board. Thank you for your interest in the register program.
Should you have any questions or concerns regarding the registration process, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
~~1MJ
James Christian Hill
National Register Assistant
it
Date:
Agenda Item I:
Title:
Issue:
Reconunendation:
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
March 4, 1992 - FOR INFORMATION
/J, 6/;0 if is, 1/)
RWSA - Student Environmental Educational Forum
Staff Contact(s): Mr. Tucker
92-017
From:
Distributed to Board: _2 . 1- ~1,.L
Asenda Item No. 9.:<. {)1{)"{~/1
RIVANNA SOLID
.,j\~~ & ALBEA!
__<<,'> ~.f}-..
0' ~
~ ~
~ ;
u -<
P.O. BOX 979
To:
District's
RE: Student Environmental Educational Forum
February 20, 1992
You are invited to participate in a planning session to
discuss a Fall 1992 Environmental Education Forum designed to
inspire leadership and interest within the secondary school
student community in cooperation with students at the University
of Virginia and Piedmont Virginia Community College.
Your host will be the Regional Recycling Group of the Thomas
Jefferson Planning District and your fellow invitees include all
public and private schools in the Planning District as well as
those in adjacent communities.
The TJPD Regional Recycling Group, made up of recycling
coordinators and volunteers from Greene, Nelson, Louisa,
Fluvanna, Charlottesville, Albemarle, the University of virginia,
and the TJPD Commission, first met in September, 1992. Our
primary aim is to educate the community on the benefits of as
well as the intricacies of implementing recycling.
We know that adults have been made increasingly aware of the
importance of recycling through legislative mandates. Further-
more, elementary schools have been the primary targets of educa-
tional materials and efforts by state and local governmental
agencies. But, we believe there is an informational void among
the 13-20 year olds.
Conscientious college students around the country have been
addressing this educational gap in their own ranks. The Univer-
sity of Virginia is a national leader in these efforts. Now that
group wants to share its ideas and what it has learned with those
who will be following in its footsteps all too soon. In response
to the Regional Recycling Group's suggestions for an approach,
the UVA students recommended a forum in which high school and
upper middle school students can listen and discuss these issues
with people whom they can better identify with---college
students.
(over)
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
DATE:
February 27, 1992
RE:
Financial Report - January 1992
Attached is the monthly Financial Report for the period of
July 1991 through January 1992.
This report does not indicate any significant variances from
what would be anticipated at this point in the fiscal year.
Overall revenues would appear to be on target with budget
projections. Some areas such as utility taxes and earnings on
investments are showing shortfalls. These shortfalls are being
offset by under estimates in other items such as local taxes and,
surprisingly, sales tax receipts. A detailed analysis of local tax
assessments, collections, and delinquencies will be available in
the next several weeks.
MAB/bs
Attachment
COUNTY OF ALBEMf\i~LE
~gai~:.;> i:':F'~ C..~.'_~ '~ii ;F:~~ ~ ';\ 1~ '.~' ':":~ll
1,,',;,j},i>~'~F"E'-"B""~d2;-:~]"'Q"-9:''''''''<; ",' \,1
,'" crt" ,"
i: f~,' i\ ..h - ) U': :;j
4 ~ ~
f. S j;."'-~""'''''_''_'_~M''''''~-'; Jt _.,
~ ~ t',.:'"' :~\'n'?'.,'>" b',Jii'''-,
EXECUTIVE OfFICE
,
Distributed to Board: ;Z-' Z Y 1 2-
."
Agenda Item No.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COUN} Y OF ALBE'^" II
r ' ''1.''iRL~
D fEW [tJ h n l"l' .'.'-
.-.." .-.,tL",- 'I~- y
....~ '"
,( ,
:FF'R 28 '9~2
\ ' .."',..... '
ULS ~ [1:, .[Il:Jr1/ ~
BOA,c';D OF SU -._~ '-'I {Jjj
Fth VISOI?S
Date:
March 4, 1992
Aaenda Item II:
tJ~, O?7tJ'/(( 0)
Title: Financial Reports for December, 1991 and January, 1992.
Issue: Attached are the financial reports for December, 1991 and
January, 1992. In the December and January General Fund Report,
the projected expenditures reflect the change in the holdback
reserve from 5% to 1% for all County departments; agencies are
shown with a 0.0% holdback reserve. The January statement reflects
increased local revenues due to a better than anticipated
collection of both real estate and personal property taxes that was
reported to you last month. These revenues can be used to fund the
anticipated revenue shortfall in the CIP Fund for the revenue-
sharing road projects.
Staff Contact(s): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, and Mrs. White
jdbm
92.030
Attachment
,
. ttI -i, ~ -i J]
"'0 )> O-izo"'OmI"'O"'OEG) O-iTlen5 m
J] > -tJ]oo)>oeee m "'0 -iJ]m-i <
0 )>)>z~J]e~tt1tt1Qz m )>)>o~o m
c.... Z rZO~^o)>ccom Z rzm )> z
m 0 o~me~~Z()()>~ en J]enJ]mr e
() m m mTl)> m
-i 0 "'Om~zJ]-O:Eenrr en <mr
m TI ~~~~~~~~~~G) mJ]
0 Zen
m J] :::! ~om ~^-i~Q e-
m mZ
X < Z mm)> Oen-<z~
"'0 m G) ~~:::! "'0 en)>
m
z z m )>rO ~ -io
0 e X ro~ m J]~
=i m "'0 "'O() ~ )>-
0 m ~e :::!~
e < t5 m~ Oen
J] m
m J] m Ze Z:ri
en en -iJ] )>
J] m m :::!
X
m "'0 0
TI m Z
r
m z >
en
() m 3: r
-i en OJ
.... 0
0 m
~ z 3:
0 -I
OJ] >
. m J: ]]
00 ~
~e 0 r
J]() m m
m-i 0 " 0
0- -
cO ~~ m z 0
OZ 3: > C
-iO (,9 (,9 (fl (fl Oco
-T1 OJ Z Z
~o "'I"''''''''''''''''''''''''' m (fl01 G)....
? 01 !IJ ~ ,!\> w.... !IJ w.... ? w.... !IJ 0;"''''''' mco m 0 ~
om CXlw~m~~000101\)"'" Oo~I\)OoW -il\) ]] 5>
.....w(O.....~m0100m~.... .....I\)O(O~
T1~ I\)CO~I\)01W010~0"'" 1\)1\)(0001\) ~
)>J] o,I\)Ooo,:"":""):.i\)i\)):.i\) 0,0:""0,00 .. r G)
G)-i O1....01.....mOOO1mI\)01m O1CX1WWO (0 ]] m
m~ OWO.....COI\)OO1W(OI\) O....WI\)~
zm (0 m z
()Z .. ""C m
-<-t 0 ]]
m)>
xr ]] >
"'Om -I r
mX
z"'O "
enm C
mZ
en en (,9 Z
....
m 01 0
en 01
'Co
01
m
0
- I
(fl ~- ~~~~~ )>
.... Z
01 ....(,9 I\)....~....W
01 I\)CO 01011\)1\)..... G)
'Co 00):, 'Co':....!):,):,:"" m
01~(,90CO(fl011\)00..... (,9~(,9(fl(,9
moo....momWI\)01W 00000
.......... .........'-'" .................................................
(,9
....
w
'Co
0
W
00
01
01
"'0
m
~~ 01~~~~01~01 m ....~m J]
~~? 1\)01....0001....000 ;ll-?915'>91 ()
0.......... ~(,.)c"OON~CO:.... .....001......... m
mI\)01I\)01.....I\)~~m(O (001\)....01 Z
~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ -i
..
.
"'tl
::u
o
~
m
o
-I
m
o
m
X
"'0
m
Z
o
=i
C
::u
m
en
::u
m
"Tl
r
m
o
-I
.....
01
~
o
::u
m
o
C
o
:::!
o
Z
o
"Tl
Z
o
Z
I
"Tl
X
m
o
m
x
"'tl
m
Z
en
m
en
OJ
>
>
Z
o
m
o
"Tl
::u
m
<
m
Z
C
m
o
<
m
J]
~
"'0
m
Z
en
m
en
-I
o
-I
>
r
o
"'tl
m
::u
>
:::!
Z
(j)
m
X
"'tl
m
Z
en
m
en
-I
OZ-I"TlenOr
-IO::um-l
>Z>O>-IO
r I zmm>
::u::uen::u ~
mm"Tl> en
<<mr 0
mm::U :I:
ZZen 0
CCz 0
mm r
en
m
x
"'0
m
Z
en
m
en
::u
~
m
Z
C
m
-I"Tl"Tl"'tl>z
::U>>COen
>OO"'tlS:::-I
~EE;=z::U
"Tl-l-l-lCi5C
miiiiii~-I~
::uenenz::U-
enOOen>O
O"'tl"'tl:::!z
zmoo
en::u::uz
-I>-I~
::U-l>>
cQ-I=1
oZQm
:::!i:zz
O>eno
z-m>
i:z::uz
0-1<0
>-m
ozo-
=n>m:I:
-zenm
00 >
>m r
:::! -I
o :I:
Z
(I)
01
.....
<0
01
<0
i\)
o
<.)
~~
0<0
(j).....
~~
(I)
(I)(I)(I)~
~~t~~
00.....~1\)
OO<.)CO.....01
01 1> <0 '0:)(11
.....01~0.....
I\)<ocom.....
(I) (I) (I)
01 e..> .....
..... ~(I)!D(I)
<0 m~~~
01 01 <.) 01 .....
<0 1\).....<001
i\) ':...11>0,0,
O~~""'01oo
<.) 10 <0 ~ 01 01
(I)
.....
~
I\)
':...I
~
(I)
01
.....
o
~
<.)
~
.....
o
:I:
>
Z
(j)
m
-
(I)
I~--~
.....(1)(1).....
.....~e..>010
co~omoo
co-.....~i\)-.....
000..... COOl
~m01m~
"""-".................... .........
~ ~
~..... -.....
1\)1\) ~
Ole..> (1)<0
~oo ~.?1~
I\)~ 00000
1\).....(I)OO1~
.....01oomo
- --
<0
01
CO
b
.....
01
-
~
<.)
~
o
~
o
.....
~o~ ~I\)
1\)0.....0<.).....
coo~~iuco
mOl\)mm~
'$.'$.'$.'$.'$.'$.
"'0
m
J]
o
m
z
-I
e..>01m01<.)
~??1~~
.....~010oo
...............())o
'$.'$.'$.'$.'$.
>
s::r
oCJ
zm
-tS::
cJ:Sj
mrr
o-<m
milO
S::ZO
CJ>c
mzz
~~~
~rCJ)
.....J]O
mJ:
"tJO
00
J]r
-til
C
Z
C
~
~
...
~
...
0)
~
01
Co
CO
0)
'0
......
01
OJ
>
):
Z
o
m
o
II
::0
!;2
m
Z
C
m
o
<
m
::0
m
X
"'C
m
Z
en
m
en
-I
0-1 ZO"'Cm:I:"'C"'Cc....CG>
-I:OOO>Occc m
>>zs:::ocS:OJOJQz
rZOs:^o>CCom
o~mC~~zoo>~
"'Cm~z::O-O:Eenrr
~~::O-l=i::g~!;20~~G>
> -<::0 m:Om 0
~ S:om r^-I~<
Z mm> Oen-<Z-:j
G> ~<~ "'C en>
m >~O s: -10
X ro~ m :os:
"'C "'CO Z >-
m S:C -I ~~
~ m~ Oen
m Zc Z~
en -1::0 >
m ~
o
z
::0
m
<
m
z
c
m
-I
O-lllenr
-I:om-lO
>>0>-10
rzm >
:oen:omr
mIl>
<mr
m::O
Zen
c-
mZ
~
"'C
m
z
en
m
en
{ft (ft
Oli{ft{ft{ftCl){ft{ft{ft{ft{ft
9C11~:"!,>:"~:"S>>:"~
COCl)~0)~~COC1l01\)"""
I\)(.o)CO......~OlCOCOCO~...
~CO~I\)C1IC1)O)O~OCO
Co I\) Cx)(l'I :... :... '0 N Co ~ :...
O...C1I......O)CO(XIO)......C1II\)
C1I(1)O...... CO 1\)(.0)01 CO CO CO
{ft {ft
~~(ft~~
CO~I\)Cn(.)
I\)~OCO......
~I\)CO(XI~
CoCO:"'(n(.)
OCl)CI)CI)O
0101 CI) 1\)01
~~
Oco
G>'"
~~
-
-EIt ..-.... .-.... .-. .-.... ..-.. ..-.
... {ft_ (ft{ft{ft{ft{ft
01 ...{ft I\)"'~"'CI)
01 I\)CO 01011\)1\)......
Co Cn~ Co:....~~:...
O)I{ft{ftOCO{ft01I\)OOCO
~ 10 0 ... 0) 0 Ol CI) I\) 01 ...
........ ................... .............................................
o
:I:
>
Z
G>
m
{ft (ft
0) (ft0)
(XI (ft0l1\)
01 1\)01\)
~ ~'OCo
O1I{ft...WCO
I\) 10 (XI ...... ......
C1I~COO1C11C11C11C11O)C1IC11
O1(1)~COCOO"""~"'COCO
oo,CoCnooOo,ooowo
O1~I\)"'O)OCOOlCl)C1I~
rf.rf.rf.rf.rf.rf.rf.rf.rf.rf.rf.
"'C
m
:0
o
m
z
-I
Ol "'~Ol
~OOlO1C11
oow~Co
1\)0Cl)I\)(XI
rf. rf. rf. rf. rf..
>
:s::r
ODJ
Zm
-13:
c...J:>
>rJJ
Z-<fn
C"T1(")
>zO
JJ>C
~-<ZZ
cD~~
~rG)
JJm
mz
""Cm
OJJ
JJ>
-Ir
"T1
C
Z
o
.
"'tI
:D
o
c:...
m
o
-I
m
o
m
X
"'tI
m
Z
o
=i
c
:D
m
00
:D
m
"Tl
r
m
o
-I
......
01
~
o
:D
m
o
c
o
:::!
o
Z
o
"Tl
Z
o
Z
I
"Tl
X
m
o
m
X
"'tI
m
Z
00
m
00
[D
>
5:
Z
o
m
o
"Tl
:D
m
<
m
Z
c
m
o
<
m
JJ
m
X
"'tI
m
Z
00
m
00
io't
I\)
~
CQ
("
~
01
io't
01
W
CQ
~
-I
o
-I
>
r
o
"'tI
m
JJ
>
:::!
Z
Ci)
m
X
"'tI
m
Z
00
m
00
-I
OZ-I"Tloor
-IOJJm-lO
>Z>O>-IO
r I zmm>
:D:DOO:D 'I
mm"Tl> 00
<<mr 0
mm:D ....
zzoo ....
cc- 0
mmz 0
r
00
m
X
"'tI
m
z
00
m
00
JJ
m
<
m
z
c
m
-I"Tl"Tl"'tl>-
:D>>CO~
~QQ];!~-I
ooccrz:D
"Tl-l-l-l(i5c
miiiiiiJJ-IO
JJOOOO~JJ:::!
000000>0
O"'tl"'tl:::!z
zmoo
ooJJ:DZ
-1>-1-
JJ-I>>
cQ-I=1
oZQm
:::!~zz
0>000
z-m>
~z:DZ
0-1<0
>-m
o Z 0 w
=n>m:I:
-zOOm
00 >
~m ~
o :I:
Z
io't
01
......
io't I io't
01 W ......
w...... ...... io't ~ io't
CQ O)~~~
0) O1W01......
...... I\)WCQ01
N ......'(,.)("(,,
Oio't~"""01oo
WOCQ~0101
~~
OCQ
Ci)......
mco
-II\)
CQ
en
......
(I)
(I)(I)(I)~
~~t~~
OO......~I\)
ooWCQ............
01'(,.)(000("
......01~0......
I\)CQCQen......
I\)
o
w
-
io't
I\)
-
io't
~~ -~
......io'tio'tCQ
......1\)1\)......0
CQ01......OOO1
CO'C,):':"'C,)N
000......01......
~OO~OO......
..... ..........
(I) ~
...... ......
~'C,) '(,.)
010 0)
,:-Jpl ,!')~
co W W 00
OOKltio'ten~
I\) 0) 10 0 (X) 0
..... ..........
o
:I:
>
Z
Ci)
m
......
o
......
:,:.,
~
.:::!
01
......
W01......en~
OOOO......w:"l
I\)w......enO)
I\)O)OO......~
'$.'$.'$.'$.'$.
"'tI
m
JJ
o
m
z
-I
~
~O
......~
00)
'$.'$.
01
?
(X)
~
~
o
011\)
~~
o 00
01 00
'$.'$.
00
01
~
o
>
3:r
Om
zm
-I~
c...J::D
>~r
Z m
c!!o
>ZO
:D>C
-(Zz
(O~~
~r(J)
:DO
mJ:
"'CO
00
:Dr
-Ill
C
Z
o
~rUL 4-, /19 d-
t
Q;).010V (S'13')
/
AGENDA ITEM NAME LhL 0t- () /' I ( t/yt 4
DEFERRED UNTIL IJ-tLrUJ.. {I I /9 9 :2
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
JodUJ~
Form. 3
7/25/86
...
~, Lf. q.:2.
7;J.. 014 tf(S./1' )
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
T)ATE:
February 28, 1992
COUNTY OF A.LBEMl\RLt:
n i'i:::-.:1 r,~~::! i-;,:.:'; rl' f' n j'-:::; ~:;l
I Ii ! ))...,",..""""'".,..,,. "do. ,...".t.J~;\ ! r II
;\:\ Mi\"( ~J 1992 ) j j I
l\ i'~"--",'''''''' ". "j'".''''''' _._".._J II J
'I ,'."" "U 'L
J I --, \ ...., ( \ \...'i \,; I" ..
..",,--' ....~~..... :I.~-~." .....:1 ...-..1
BOARD OF SUPERV1S0l1S
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
Robert W. paskel~~
Division superin~:
TO:
RE:
Broadus Wood Elementary Construction Design
In order to keep you and the Board of Supervisors informed
on the design of Broadus Wood Elementary School project, I have
enclosed a copy of an agenda item from the February 24th meeting
of the School Board. This agenda item requested the Board's
authorization to include the potential expansion of the kitchen
and dining areas at Broadus Wood Elementary School in the design
of the previously approved expansion on this site. As the agenda
item explains, it is our hope the construction market in May,
when we hope to bid this project, will be receptive to including
the expansion of the kitchen and dining areas for construction at
the same time. Given the economic conditions, we anticipate that
we can get more construction for the funds allocated for this CIP
project than was originally planned.
The expansion of the kitchen and dining areas will be bid as
an "additive alternate" to the classroom construction. Should
the base bid for the classroom construction be below the
estimated cost and the "additive alternate" cost be within the
total project funds, we would then seek approval to incluse the
expansion in the current construction. On the other hand, if the
bidding market is such that the kitchen/dining area expansion
cannot be financed, we will seek funding through a future CIP
project for a later completion of the work on this site.
Should you or the Board of supervisors have any questions
concerning the action of the School Board to include this
additional design requirement for the architect, please contact
me at your convenience.
RWP/bmc
Enclosure
COUNTY OF AlBErv,f'\Rl..f.
cc: school Board Members
on';",". .~:. \
~\r
~',
F.r MAR 3
k's\,.
t '~ ~~':;t-;.-' -:.
EXeCUTIVE GfflGc
..
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
SUBJECT: Broadus Wood Elementary DATE: February 24, 1992
CIP Cafeteria/Kitchen
Expansion ENCLOSURES: -1-
CATEGORY: -REASON FOR CONSIDERATION:
Operational: ~ Action: ~
Policy: Information:
- -
Backoround
This project has been a part of the CIP for many years with a variety of
costs and project configurations. An administrative decision was made not to
change the size of the cafeteria/kitchen, which appeared to be adequate to
accommodate the projected increase in capacity. The current enrollment is
414. The anticipated rated capacity will be 533.
Although the current staff was not part of this decision, we feel it was
made in good faith but without fully considering the impact that over 100
additional students would have on the cafeteria/kitchen. When we met with the
school committee and heard from the community, the greatest concern expressed
was that the cafeteria/kitchen was not part of the project.
Their primary concerns were:
1. In order to accomodate the current 414 students, lunch is served
from 11:25 a.m. until 1:30 p.m. At least one more 30 minute shift would have
to be added to accommodate the additional students.
2. Concerns that it "didn't make sense" to disrupt the school with
construction for 18 to 20 months, and not expand the cafeteria at the same
time.
3. The cafeteria was not enlarged when the school was expanded in 1984
by six classrooms and the addition of five trailers since then have made the
cafeteria/kitchen conditions unacceptable.
State guidelines suggest that cafeterias seat 1/3 to 1/2 of the school
enrollment at one time. (Approximately 10 square feet per diner for
elementary schools). To accommodate this enrollment a 500 square foot
expansion is needed to the cafeteria and the kitchen would need to be enlarged
by approximately 1,100 square feet. The estimated cost of this expansion is
$368,800.00, which includes new kitchen equipment.
In order to take advantage of the current favorable bidding climate we
would recommend that the cafeteria/kitchen be bid with the regular project in
Mayas an alternate to be accepted by February 1, 1993 pending funding
approval. We feel that a significant portion of the cafeteria/kitchen
expansion can be funded from the current CIP budget, and the remainder could
be requested in our 1993-94 CIP request.
...... .,.
Distributed to Board: 2. zf."c; 2.
Item No. tj Z O?(N. (tv
Edward H, Bain, Jr,
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R, Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S, Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
Board of Supervisors
f, tCL/
\,1>1'1 i
FROM:
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
DATE: February 28, 1992
SUBJECT: Reading List for March 4, 1992
Juno 19, 1991 - pa~es 41 - end
Mr. BowerlllCUl ~,ClLJ1
~.14, 1991
pages 21 (#11d)
31
Mr. Bmvcrm.J.B- ~j
September 4, 1991 - All - Mr. Bain
Octnb~r 16, 1991 - p:lgco 1 14 (#7) - pqr!;. HWLlPl1:t.i::s-~
September 11, 1991 "= ~~ "( M {{) (!1~~ i-;~~ i ~..~~;~s H~r:~
pages 54 (#15) - 66 (#16) - Mr. Bai~O_ ~
~ pagcD 6G (*16) - enrr Mr. Bowerman ~(~
LEN:ec
Distributed to eoarcf:'~2~Zf.'7 2..-
Agenda Item ~Jo.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE
COUNTYQ,""!\, -'Ell
'-"1 ....=<. ) j"' l~I' U :..,\4ARlE
n'/' /1" 1 <~:' . ~ ,"'''/ .. -.,.
Jl,~)r.,\" I; f1lr.J/-:::--,r,
,,,IV '..... 1:1
'I ' ~ f:'''''"" \ t \ I I
f : I " " ' , J /,
sU""'IIo'DY II' ; )!!
j.......~ ,i~ ~ ,J'
U '.", ._..._,oi _~.
Br-\, , "".., .,
- t...}r~."\L, I.)~ ~. '\
"'';'' ,\ i.., j
-"
Date: March 4, 1992
;.~~~J r~s
Aaenda Item #:
C)t/~ , d 10 " i / Z. Cj
Title:
Abandonment of Old Brown's Gap Turnpike (Route 629)
Issue: Applicant to request the Board consider a possible
solution (see Attachment I).
Backaround: Request to set a public hearing to abandon a portion
of Route 629 was denied by the Board of Supervisors on February 14,
1990 (see Attachment II). The Board authorized the County Attorney
to file suit to remove the gate placed access Route 629. The
Fourth Circuit Court rendered summary judgement in favor of the
plaintiff Board of Supervisors in January. The defendants (Edward
H. Ripper and Phyllis o. Ripper) have appealed this decision to the
United States Court of Appeals.
Discussion:
a request
interested
Payne will
meeting.
Fred Payne, attorney for the Rippers, will present
to seek resolution to the entire matter. He is
in discussing possible resolution at a staff level. Mr.
present his proposal at the Board's March 4, 1992 day
Recommendation:
None, provided for information.
staff ContactCs):
Messrs. Tucker, st. John and Cilimberg
jbat
92.026
"i
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development .-
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
COUNTY OF ALB Eh.1l\R LE.
ffll, (rf~~G?JJS\"CIf::J fl~
IU! )\, II
4 f")~r'''I)~"
~ {\ J:"FR 9\-\ ",I.!, 1\ \ " ,
'I, , ,.,,' " .,.. I \
U1 \ \ [-"""-'''''''''''' ",."...,/ \ I J I
\.j L,:':..:..~ t.\::~..,i L...:~ l_.,; \,} :_.,~.,~~~~ (,.~._,;
BOt~Hi) ()F St.) "-'-'\/;::.:C);'-<~;
February 24, 1992
Mr. Frederick W. Payne
412 East Jefferson Street
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Fred:
l
I amAnreceipt of your letter of February 19, 1992
regarding'abandonment of Route 629. I have gotten this item
scheduled for the Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March
~ 14, 1992 lday meeting). I have arranged for you to cover
\, this request with the Board. Please let me know if you have
" ,.",'." .
'-"-a.Q..y._gues t ~ 0 ns .
Sincerely,
aJ
e Cilimberg
Dire or of Planning
& Community Development
VWC/blb
cc: B~b Brandenburger
I./!;ettie Neher
\.
..
Telephone
(804) 977-4507
February 19, 1992
RECE~VED
FEB 2 0 1992
C~~8~~EMARlE
[~ Q>E~,i~, ~
- - i.8~) 97
FFB 24. f992
i, !!; l31SlJ~7~ .. .
BOARD OF SUPERVISOi{S
Frederick W. Payne
Attorney at Law
412 East Jefferson Street
Suite B
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning and
Community Development
Albemarle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 2290l-4596
File 206-89--Abandonment of old Brown's Gap Turnpike (Route 629)
Dear Wayne:
Thank you for your telephone call of this afternoon.
As you know, the Rippers have filed a notice of appeal of the
Court's decision in the County's case against them. This appeal is
taken in order to protect the Rippers' rights with respect to the
litigation in light of the time limitation which would otherwise
have run after February 14.
However, the Rippers continue to believe that it would be
everyone's interest to consider a resolution of the entire matter
(including, but not limited to, the matters in litigation). Such
a resolution was discussed some two years ago but was lost in the
course of the litigation. While we have no fixed idea of what this
might entail, it seems to me that this might include such things as
closure of a portion of the old road below the Park boundary;
abandonment of a portion of the existing state road; provision of
public pedestrian/equestrian access to the Park; clarification of
the obligations for maintenance; provision of parking area for
public access; and access for emergency vehicles. Obviously, any
resolution which might be reached would be subject to the rights of
third parties, including utility companies having rights of access
under recorded easements.
It would be my intent to propose such a resolution. I am
aware that the Rippers have an absolute right to request the action
of the Board of Supervisors and that no such agreed resolution
could be finally reached except after appropriate public hearings.
However, we have no desire to waste time, either ours or yours,
and, as a preliminary matter, I believe that it would be useful for
us to meet in an informal setting to discuss the matter at the
staff level, including representatives of the County and Park
Service staffs, as well as their counsel if desired. Such informal
discussions would allow us all to see if we have sufficient common
ground to make it worthwhile to pursue the matter, and, if so, in
what form. It would necessarily be understood that no member of
.. .
,
Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg
Page 2
February 19, 1992
their respective staffs is empowered to bind the Board of
Supervisors or the Park Service without final ratification by those
bodies.
This is to request that you present this proposal to the Board
at their earliest convenience, asking that they authorize the staff
to meet with us on the terms set out above.
Sincerely yours,
,.fc;rt<<ct << x/&/fL/
pJ Frederick W. Payne
cc: Mr. and Mrs. E. H. Ripper
Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
George R. St. John, Esquire
Joseph W. H. Mott, Esquire
ATTACHMENT II
F
L......~, '
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Guy B. Agnor, Jr., County Executive
FROM:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and
Community Development
DATE:
November 8, 1989
RE:
Request to abandon a portion of Route 629
Mr. Edward H. Ripper, owner of Tax Map 5, Parcel 4, White
Hall District, is requesting that the Board abandon a
portion of Route 629 which runs through his property (See
Attachment A). Mr. Ripper "has experienced a significant
level of illegal activities on his property brought about by
use of the road including: poaching, spotlighting of game,
trespassing, dumping, littering and the riding of
all-terrain vehicles (ATV's) and motorcycles" (See
Attachment B). Staff opinion is that vacation of the public
right-of-way may deter some of these activities but would
likely have little practical effect as to trespass,
poaching, and littering. As to the current status of the
roadway, there appears to be some confusion. Mr. Ripper has
requested that the Board "abandon the rights of the public
and Virginia Department of Transportation discontinue
maintenance of the portion from point A to point B"
(Attachment A - red line). Staff opinion is that this
action may not suit Mr. Ripper's desires since there is no
evidence that the public use of the road above point A has
been abandoned (Attachment A - blue line). Assuming that it
is Mr. Ripper's desire to abandon public use of the entire
road through his property, this would represent a length of
about 2 miles. Unless Mr. Ripper can present evidence that
public use of any portion of the roadway has been abandoned,
staff opinion is that the existing gate (approximately at
Point A) and trespass signs may be illegally placed. Staff
will assume for the purposes of this memorandum that public
use,has not been abandoned as to any portion of the roadway
through Mr. '"Ripper's property.
.
....,.....,~i
This particular road abandonment case is somewhat more
complicated than some prior reviews ( staff would need more
time to further research/validate the following comments):
1. Historical Significance: - This roadway, known as the
Brown's Gap Turnpike was commissioned by the General
Assembly in 1800. During the Civil War the road served
as a strategic route for Stonewall Jackson's troops to
travel between the Shenandoah Valley and points east
(See Attachment C). As can be seen from the USGS map
in Attachment A, a Civil War gun emplacement overlooked
the roadway. This gun emplacement has been
incorporated as an exhibit by the National Park Service
along Skyline Drive. An objective of the Comprehensive
Plan is preservation of natural, scenic, and historic
assets and discontinuance of public access to this
roadway would appear contrary to that effort.
2. Hiking Access to Shenandoah National Park - This road
provides access to a fire road which intersects hiking
trails to Jones River Falls and Doyles River Falls.
Abandonment of public use of the roadway would preclude
such access. Preliminary comment on this issue is as
follows:
~eY'(
a. The National Park Service has pieliminarily stated
points of access to the park are'~ limited and
bona fide recreational access should not be
discontinued. The National Park Service also has
stated an intent to be a "good neighbor" to
adjoining property owners and also has problems
with illegal activities cited by Mr. Ripper. Mr.
Patrick Mullaney, Director of Albemarle County
Parks and Recreation also prefers to maintain
access to the park.
b. Vehicular access from Skyline Drive and the bottom
of the mountain offers "relay" opportunities to
certain community members who may not otherwise be
able to enjoy the Jones River and Doyles River
Falls due to physical limitations (this is
comparable to canoe relay). Staff has discussed
the possibility (if legally sound) of restricting
vehicular access but maintaining pedestrian right
of use of the roadway. This would add about 2 to
4 miles to a hike.
3. Access to Other Users - In addition to the National
Park Service, staff understanding is that Virginia
Power, CENTEL, and (until 1991) a private individual
use this roadway.
. "
~
SUMMARY - Staff opinion is that Mr. Ripper's situation is
not uncommon to remote areas of the County. Mr. Ripper
certainly has the right to post and fence his property at
the limits of the public right-of-way. As to matters of
dumping and the like, these situations probably existed
prior to Mr. Ripper's purchase of the land and his remedies
should be the same as any other property owners along a
public right-of-way.
Staff opinion is that upon preliminary review there appears
to be a substantial public interest in maintaining public
access to the Shenandoah National Park which outweighs the
proprietary interest of the individual property owner in
this particular case.
VWC/RSK/meb
cc: Pat Mullaney, Parks and Recreation
Rick Childs, Shenandoah National Park
.0'1
T
. .
.'
4
~
" ~
;
, I
r~ ,
i
~ I
!
'\= I
~ .I
1 ---
"-
'"'"
~'
(-
~~
~~
t
t
I
r
(,
:1
!!l
::t
~
O.S ~
,~,2' ~
~.sf'l.
.,*
: 0'1 Q:
!n(\j
. \O:t
'0 '" '='
6:iCi
. 0 3::
~Q:"t>
: .. lu
II) '0 """ti
'[:;-;:.QQ)
'0 v, '=' c
Q...... ll) 0
oc"t>
goc:l::5
'~.Q 0 -g
o~"tl
.c: 0 c '"
(/) Q. ~ .Q
i.
"!
:1 ~
z.
." I'
.."
.! "
h ~
!a ,
- i
,
~
'-
<1>
0-
0-
'(i:. ,
, '?
..,.. .
-"
,-0 "
00
~tl..
-0
W
.. II
" ..
~ !!
vaS.:
Iii"
:t~~ 2
~..~ : ::
;~~ ~l i
~h ~til
~ uO :.....
:1~~ :ii~:.
lQ:l...I-'rI::~
"'~~ 1:~!
..........., ...,-
i ~~ I!=l;
(-
N
~
~
l, t
. t.
~i1l'
:~t~
.~ .:
~ 1
I ~!
'" "
.~H
lW
(J
I-
o
Z
5
~ ~
;~!~
!~;?
i~y;
.ll~
fo; ~;
w I
I- 1 t
0
z ~ ~ ~ t
. ! I
: ~
.
...
I-
:>
0
a:
'--:\, =--------
..... .;
.
l ~
!~;
.~~
l~~
~~ ~
~
l!l.l~jj~~~jjijl;jlljjjjjjj,j;i~j~ijjjjjjjj
,4 ........................................
,I .".."~._"~.._...
\ ::::==~=:~=::::::=::::::::::::::::::::::
~ :::::=::::::=:::=:=::"::"..~"".._.""..".
11 ":.:::=:::=-==::~-:=:::::~::~:-::::"~:::
,~ ........................................
._.~_.~.._.A....~...~....~..___._...~.~ft~.~ft..."~~.~..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ :::~::::::=:::==:::::::=:::~:=:::::::::=::::~:~::~=~=:
ftftftft"_""" """_ .ft""~ __ ~ __~~~"__"~~"__ _~."_"_
,
1. ......................................................
..~
11 ==:==:=::=:~::===:=:::==:::::==:=:=:=:::=:=:::==::::=:
! ._._.__~_._~~__~_.~~~.__"~_._."_~_~~~___~"a~._.ft__~~__
1!_~:;;i;;;;;;;~;;;;;::;;;;;;;;;;;~;;;:;;:;::;:;F::;;;:;
. .~~...........................-_...............-......
~
I
"",
.
~ 1
: n
\ .."
-dl
~ l~~
:~lI:.W~.iiilli~~~~=-:r.
~ ~~::~!~~~t~~!::~~~~
.=..:'dll&Ca:ii..:n::ii~A.
Oti;,:;';'cariai;Oii-i.2.iii..
......... ...............
':--..._.-.==:ie.~s=&1i
!I
--l--
..___.._.._.______.._____._.._____.._._.___._.._____..__0__-
. . '~ 0 ~ '\
----:--- .
~...--_......t.~-.._------.....------..--
I
I,
sa::mnOS3CI 1\fCI3NIW .:10 NOISIAIO
'tINIOHIA 30 HJ.1't3MNOWWOJ
.
~
1> \\)Gr-\KfE-,~ ~
---_..- -~-------"
220 EAST HIGH STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
22901 804.296.6942
LAND SURVE)QRS. LAND PLANNERS
Reverend Peter T. Way, Chairman
County Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
RE: Edward H. Ripper Property
Tax Map 5, Parcel 4
White Hall District
Albemarle County, Virginia
Dear Reverend Way:
Mr. Ripper has asked my office to present to the Board his request to abandon
from the Secondary Road System a portion of State Route 629 (formerly Brown's Gap
Road).
Please find attached "EXHIBIT A" showing a portion of State Route 629
(approximately 4,284 feet) to be abandoned. A segment of the road is the dividing line
for Parcels C and D owned by Mr. Ripper. The Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) presently maintains State Route 624 to point "B" (shown on "EXHIBIT A") within
existing 30' (thirty foot) prescriptive right-ot-way. This right-of-way centers on the
travelway of State Route 629.
Mr. Ripper has experienced a significant level of illegal activities on his property
brought about by use of the road, including: poaching, spotlighting ot game,
trespassing, dumping, littering and the riding of all-terrain vehicles (ATV's) and
motorcycles. Since the road serves only Mr. Ripper's properties and the end of state
maintenance is presently deep in Mr. Ripper's property, he requests the Board to
abandon the rights of the public and VDOT discontinue maintenance of the portion
from point "A" (presently the End of State Maintenance) to point "B" as shown on
"EXHIBIT A".
We ask that this matter be heard by the Board at the earliest date. Please do not
hesitate to contact me if I can provide additional support in this matter.
Kirk ug e, .S.
Kirk Hughes & Associates
attachm.~nt: 3 copies "EXHIBIT A"
xc: Chri~ ~ipper .'
"
'J
I""
-:;'~:
.;->~'"
KIRK HUGHES & ASSOCIATES
oor.
an
Albemarle in the Civil War
~mmary, completed after the war ended, reveals that between July
'1861 and February 1865 the Charlottesville General Hospital ad-
.DUtted 21,540 cases. Many of the soldiers were suffering from typhoid,
. laria, diarrhea, dysentery, pneumonia, and measles, although two-
!birds were victims of gunshot wounds (5,337) and "other diseases"
(9,764). Only 5.2 percent (1,123) died; in other words, there was
One death in every 19.2 cases during months which encompass virtu-
lily the entire war. Ie ,
~:lt is apparent that though Charlottesville General Hospital was the
(Cnter of all this wartime medical activity, the wounded (including
~casional Yankee prisoners) sometimes were lodged in other struc-
,hues such as Scottsville's Baptist Church, and those recovering from
both battle injury and disease were housed in numerous private homes
!broughout the county, among them Morea and the Headquarters.
I,Chalmers Gemmill bemoans the fact that historians have paid little
'attention to this very important contribution of Albemarle citizens to
"the Confederacy and notes that it is remembered today by no memo-
"rial marker in either the town or the university. Admittedly, it was
(diverse, almost indefinable operation lacking clear geographical
_boundaries and ministering to a constantly changing volume of pa-
bents, at times thousands, sometimes a mere handful, depending
,upon the vagaries of warfare. Most of the buildings used have since
disappeared. The Charlottesville General Hospital's true memorial lies
:instead in tile satisfaction of a community enterprise accomplished
tkspite innumerable difficulties and in the sincere thanks of hundreds
, Of boys in gray who were nursed back to health amid pleasant sur-
roundings, whether housed briefly in public structures such as the
Rotunda or in private homes.
'.Military operations within Albemarle County, as noted, were ex-
~mely limited. Thousands of troops, boys from Tennessee, Alabama,
aDd other states, passed through the community from time to time,
~t the sound of gunfire was rare indeed. In the late, spring of ,1862.
Stonewall Jackson and his men appeared in the western fringes o'f
!be county on several occasions as they maneuvered to outsmart su-
. rior enemy forces during the renowned Valley Campaign. Early , iIi
i~ythey slipped down through Brown's,Gap to Mechum'sRiv~r
..h~re they cl~mbere'd'aboard Virginia Central cars bound for'Staun-
111 James O. Breeden, "Insights into the Medical Statistics of the Charlottes-
1iI1e General Hospital, 1861-1865," M ACfl 30 (1972): 43-59. Statistics
Plhered by Jones and quoted by Breeden differ slightly from those of Gem-
,'1iI1 since they cover a somewhat briefer period.
t--ll..0\-\M:e~ c..
.
"
"-
o
C'l
1=:,.!.Q)r-.'O ~eno"08 >,eneno.....____
'" -en .c:.v I=: "0 '" ~ '" _ V ~ en I-< C..!.. '0 '0 >. 0.. Q) "0 I '0 Q) I Q) I
:E ::l ~..c: ::l ~ .... o..c:.g 5 ~ @;:j . ~ ~ '"i:i @ "2 g -5 I=: g. ~ ..c: ~ 8 -5 2 .~.~ ~ ~ t- E :3
~.o ~ -::: .E ~ 11 'E en I=: en ~ 8 8 ~.... i::..2 ~ 0.... g Q) I=: ~ v g 2 .B -B -B S g 1:l 0 U
f'V" .... ':::' 0 >,;> ..... 0 ~ ~ ro "0 .... if) "0 ,~,- en '" Q) bD 8 .... .... v .,. .....:: :: ::l U ~ U (fl
-1=:.......... ~ c..?,..!4 :;"Q)O ..c: ro.r::"Oo"'~.c: ~~ 0 S'OroQ)u'Oo
<t: ~ ~ o..~ ~ui 11 I=: ro -: t: ..g ~ gp..... .c-.!: ~ C-i ~.t: '0 ........ 0 ~ i ~ r-. . a 'O.s ~ '3 .
~ ~ ; ::l .....,.t; 8 8 ro ,5 >. 0 ~ ........ 8:; '" Q) . Q) I=: en Q) en. Q) ..... I:: :?fro "'~ ~ ~ 0 'l:l.
en 0.. I=: .... I=: 1=:.- 0:><:: . S U bD I=: ~ 8 ~ 'l:l...c: 11 ;:j '0 ro .t; g ~ ~ -a ~ Q) ._ ~ >. I'< ::l ;t S
v 1:! ~ ~ 0 ~..;:: Q) "0 :;.. .... Q) I=: o..s..... B I=: '0 B ~ I=: ~ v 0 ,_ ro...c:: ~ 1:: 0 ~ 2 0 8 v
~ 2 if) ~ ~.c ~ 0..-5 ~ E'E -5.S Q)"O >.'0 '" I=: en u.- :>..c: U -.. :>< .... r-. '" U I .... ~.... ~
.Een.....5....0"~::l.....Q)"O.B"oQ)::::.....S~Q)...c::::l....~enl=: ~ u~ 'Oro ~vv~"'Q)C<l
Q) < ..c: . v "'J Q) ro..c:..c: ~.;:: Q) ~ .- ~ .... .E 11 ~,~.... ~ C<l ~ Q) ~ Q) ..... .... 0 Q) ",..c: Q)
.~ ~ -ci : ~ ~.~ ~ -5 ~.S ~ ~ ~ ~ -S b/) ~ ~ ~ s : .c:;g ~ ~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -B
I=: .c: ::l.... U ~ "> I=: .......c:: "0 ...c:: .... en.c: .... Q) 0 >. '" U U..c: >. -. Q) ~ ........ .... -B .s
...... ~ v bD 0 ~ l..'- 0 I Q) L....s .t; ~ _..... 0 ~ :;..- ~ .... 8 .~ bD.o '0 >. ........ u
,..., '0 I=: .....~ 0.. "0 I=: '" 15 .... >. "0" .... .......... S ... I=: '" Q) ......c:.... ~ !:: ~ 5"i:: ~ "q t: I::~ -B ~ .~
Q) :: ~ ~ "0 S...... .@....1:-.,'O 8 !: ui ~ S'" UO ..c: ~ Q) S; '" '" Q) Q)'" 0 .~ ro .... Iii C<l U 2: '0
..c: w ......... Q) '" I;S ~ Q) Q) ... Q)...... '" U ~ :::: ::l...c:: I=: .0 ~ ~ .... E .~.....
..... '0..... >...... .... .......... .t; U I=: 0 ~ U ::l 11.... ::l 0...;:: ~ 8 .... Q) '0 .c: "0 ~ ~ c~ 0 >..~ !:l 0....
I=: ro ,- M en Q) r-..... ::: .... Q) S;::l 0'" r-. g v S S en "0 Q) .... '0 v U Q).5 Q) ..... ',.;I ..... bO.:::: ....
6 S >, ~ I=: '" ~ ~ 't >..E I:: en S '(:).~ ~::E r:; 8 ~ ~ S .oSQ) .5 "5 ~.E ~ -5 .s ::: '0 t ~.2! ~
...c:: ~ ~:.a I:: en '" en Q) ~:.a ~ ~.c: ~ .... !1 o.o::l ..c: ~....:l B ro I:: .~ <: ~ U U ~.c;;
'0 -5 .....:: ~ 8 >. I=: .....c: Q).~ ;> ... ..... ..... ~'O ui I=: ~ i:: c I=: Q) ~ 2<.,., v.: .. ~ t: C Q) ~
v 0 ..... U ::l.o.- v .... :;. ~ Q) ..... ::l I=: .... Q) v '" I'< S ...... _. ~ ~ 8 _, '0.... '" _. I'< ....
.0.0 en ::l X - ro "0 Q) ... ;> Q) '0 g 2 >. '" ::l 8 :;'...c:: ::l 11 Q) en .-..c:.... Q) U c:a '" v 0
..... ro 0 .. 0 '0 .... '" U ~ ,... ,... ... 8 0 Q) .... U J=i "-- .... ~ '0..... Q) 0 U @ rg 1'<.0 fI) ::. ....
.... bD ~ U Q);j-' Q) I=: ~ ~ ........... ... .... ...c:: - '. ~ :::..c: !i1 ,~ ;>
U ... >''0 v .... - .....- >, ~ I=: ro ~ 11 .... Q) 6 5...... ::l 2 ti '8- "0 2 ~ Q) ~ ~ -5 ~ !" 11
"'...UQ)....U'" ~ en.... '" ~......l=:ro.....-8 vo......... en '0"" _ "'U-.:I'"
Q)'N v.... I=: ~ -5 .t: "0 ~ ~ ~ "0 >< en._ '" '" 8 I=: ",... ~,,~ ~ Q) :;::l..... ro..... '" I::
'0.:;-: U .... ~ en Q) 0 '0 ,;;;:;_ ~., ~ S 5 .t; ::l.u '" >. Q) 8">.> Q) Q) ..... ....... C 'f: ~ '" ~ .-::; ~ .8
Q) Vi U ::l .... >.::l g...... I=: .....:E 2: s:: .... .......c: U ::l 5 ~en '" ~ '0 ::< .~:::: '" ::l I'< V '"" ~ U'F U E
....... (I)...., c:: r:::::: -. QJ ('1 !;: cu 0 0 _ ~.-::: ,... 1-t._ ;>.. ~ cu Q) ~._ -;:: er; Ci) .... ~ . ~ u ~ ~ ~:;:; ~~
~ ~ I=: Q) ",.... Q)::z:: ~ .v.... ..c:... Q)'- U I=: - 0 v ::l ... '" <3 '" Q) .B -.... ~ - t3-
"':'~~58~~.g~ ~~~~.~"35<E~,:~~;:l~~bn:O~s ::E~g~ll.c;; "51sd'11::>~ ~
~.- '" ..... v 0::: ~.::l 8..c:..... :> Q)..c: '" Q) .... _ _ Q) '- ::..9 Q).... ~ 1=:.... ~ ..c: u ~ oS: 1U . ro 0
<0 I=: VJ ..c: U bD en bD ..... '" v 8 ..... ...c: o.....~ ~"':>.;::;" ~ ... ~ () '0 ~+J C 1.I C<l ...
CO '0 '" Q) f-i U ..... I=: g. Q) Q) ~ en en 0 ..... -5 ........ O...c:: ~.- Q)..... I=: ~ @ 8.Vi..5 ~ r:: .... "".;::..c: ~
... .;:::; "0 '0 '" 1=:..;::: 0 ';:: I=: ~ ~ ~ '" ::l .... ~ :E '" ..... I=: S; <J:: ,8 ::l..c: ::l Q) ~ .0 ..... <U '0 Q).;:: "'_
~ I'< I=: ..c: ...; 0 ::l..c: .... ..... Q) '" U I=: ......0 '" r:: b/) 0 .... 5 ~ Q) 0 v .... 0 U I=: :> ~ 0 ..... ~ -5 <U 0,,<; ~
~ l-o '" ::: r:: ..... 8 bD..... ~ Q) U ::l S 0.. ~ ~ ::l .S ..... ~ It) Q) S..c: S ~..c: <U ~..2 "':J r::.....::: .... ..... Q
~ b/) It) v '0 U <J:: -5 !=' -S >. en ~ ~ 0.. 8 3 r::..... S; '"2 '" ;,,~ 0 U I=: g ~ ..c: ~..... 5 s <U 0 C<l :: ~ "Q
-5 ~ r::..c: 8"g '" en.r; ~ >. @ ..c-!=, en 0 <U I=: '0 ~ ~'" ~ 'E ro =: en 1U:.a 0..-5 S '" S .!: 0 .:1 5 Q) c: ~
@ :.;;:.....~ ~ ~ '" ;>;r..o (;i ~ '" P::; '0 Q) Q).o t;.o 0 en;;; b1J ~.~ ::l"'O 0 ;; e .:;..... [; s:: t; e p~ R
..,.. r:: U "0 ::l >. 0 I=: ~ >. >.~ ''::: :::: g. It) ::; 't; u ~ V; It) U "'0 ~'.5 bn>"'O It)..p._.... U.:!J C. C ~j ~ c1i'r' """
e ~ g:'~ ~ oS -e g::=: i:: ~ @:g::: ~ !:> 'C 5 c;,~ 15.... e oS? e 5 "-.N fi.:; ~ '2 '~,2 B:9 "::. ~., '0 1It,...,,,~,1':-
..... ... '" ..... 0..... "'--......... ~.o bI>.c:: .......... 0 ... IX: u... IX: "'- 0 Jl;;j t=: ~ B < b .II .,.. "
c:,
r
C')
~
.....
't"
co
0>
...
......
r-.
ro
~
~
~
t5
~
--
.;::
U
Q)
..c:
.....
.5
v
"'i::
'"
8
Q)
.0
~
,,~
:E
o
~
....
o
~
~
~
C<l
/Xl
"
~
~
>.
....
r::
::l
o
U
en
~I::
o
en
t
~
It)
f-)
, gp:k.@ fa -5i ~ ~ ~.8 Ci1 ".-'- :>-. '" '" .... :;; ton:U ~ ~ c:r ~ --g ~";:; t-n.g"~J."~!':~!f"''''~?f1'~~'''' rtt,. ,,'
.~ 8 ~ '.p & ~ ::::' .c:......=: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:: ~'~.~ ~ .B~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ e ~ ..s ~ l ~ ~ ' ., ~.~ ~ ~ -tJ
.~ -..... Q) v ~ v .... 0 0 2l - .... ~ 1=:.... ... ..... ..... .... ..... r::.... '" ~ ;:;;: .>.c.. s:: ....,~ ~,
..s >..... Q).~ ~en ,... .... '0 1.1 C W - Q) ro ..-..... '" ov U ro ov u...... 0 ._ .,,10 .,._ ""
- ..c: I=: g;.;:; ~'"dV]o;:: 0 j;:; bDJJ.i;.S 0 c~Z{J g ro ~ r-. o..r:: Q)--........ "> @"'-'.....>',p 2
o g l-o ..... ro .-..... 0 I=: ro ..... 2 -5.!: ~ ro ..... -.:: I'< U I=: en "'.0 . I:: ~l.. ...\ -= ' ~, t: il:l
.... .E~:::: 8 0 .... ro .t;;:! .. .......... 1=:.,... I=: ro Q) >. ~ if) ~ ~ Q) >''"d ~ ~ ro ~ .?~~:Z..c:i:;;;,
...... Q) v I=: v .- 0.. .-... v '"0 .;:: p:; s ...... en Q)..c: en .....::: bl) Q) ro;::...c:: ro v >>......._ 1:" - ~ I' c:l CJ) "1:S
.2:l ~.o.@ U ro p::: 0...B ~ ro 0.. - Q) ~ 8 u Q) ~ ~ ~ -:8 Q) ro .... ~ ~ ~ @ ~ I;S ;: o'~.~ Q):6
ro..c: 0 .... 1.1 ~..... '" ro b/) '" &.E ro '"d 8 ~ .....c: ~ -;:: U ..c:.o ..... -.;::; '0 Q)....::x:: ;> ""0'1.1 .c;'i
-:: .....- ~ ~ ">' c!f '" t: .t;.c ~ - ~ ~ ~ Q) .t; >. U ~ '1::: ~.!:: bD..... ro g.e I:: -5 I:: 1.1 I:: g 1Xl'g , e r-<,,~
...... .- - - ~ CO Q) v '0 ~ 0 ::l ....:-;::: :;'..c: '0 8 .e.... . <..,.. Q) I=: '"d Q)...... 0._ Q) 1::.- ~ '"Cl ~ t: .."0
i::~ o~.=: '"':::: l-o Q) -U....:> G..... v Q) Q) I:: bD ~-5.Vi ~-5 ~c;j u:::.t; ~ Q) =~<~,~t-~
o .0 ~ .....0 ro ~.... ro 'E ~ ~ en ~.... ..... I:: '0 0.:: Q) I:: ~ 'U a.~ Q) Q) :::.c: c;j ~ -; .c 1;;' l:l ;.,.,.
S ::l Q) I=:...c:: O'l:> Q) 0 ~ o..c:: ro ..... ..... g g Q) I::..!!l I=: ~.@ 1l .... roo I:: ~ :> S...c:: ..... 1:::..... ;> 't CJ).I:: ::lo.....
0.. Q) C'l ~::I:: U 1:::::: b/)::: -0 0.. U Q) .... - .... 0 .... .... 1.1 V ,... ~ en ro.... Co... 01 0 Q) ::l U ....
.....Q):::"''''dQ) >...... Q)Q)::l_-v. ,-0 Q);';::ro.....o..ro r-....... ....u.v..... I:: "'..c:.o 0
"'" P::: bD I-< -0 Q)'" en >. 0 ro l-o ::: ~ '0 ~ -5 ~ ~ >-'-l ro ::l ~ I:: ::l >-..... Q).@ I:: I:: Q) 11 Q) ...;.... Q) ..
cO 1::: ro.5 ~ ~ "i: ...s ~ ~ en 13 ~~ en .( ~ ~ g.8 ~'" ~ u ~:"S! It) ~~ :5 ~ : ~ .E:- .t; ; oS ~ : -s ~~
>.0 o....'o..c: I-<~ ~>.I:::.a..... rIlU Q) ,~"<ll..c: en,""" I-< .........0 It) ~ S ro v Q) O"Q).... I=:o~ '-~c:lol el:l
ro p........@>.-2UgJ.........r-.-5;.:;:< ..... ~ UJ C ..... _ - ::l ro .... '" 8 I:: - 0 ..... en '0 ~~ 0 0'>, Q) Ill)
..,.. 0 V ryo ::. I=: ~ 0 ::l..... ro 0 '"' ::l en --;;:: It) 0 .8 '0 _>. I::~"" ro :;:: 8 ~ ~ It)..... ~ '';:: o~:!:! l:I
~ "0 &.o..c: ..........;>::l.......... 0 ro ..... CO 0 .... c.c:.c: '" I=: v Q) Q)...... Q) ;> ..... u"'.E:-~ ro ... ~'~.... ~
I=: W ..... I:: 0 en 0 ::l.... en I=: I=: Q) 1'<.... VJ ro '"Cl.... . '-'..c: en .... ..... .c: OJ .c .... <.
1::0 ro ," "'d Q).. 0 ,-0.::: U .0 . VQ) ..... Q) I:: 1::0 ~ g "0 VJ I-< I=: 8 ~ 0 en Q) .... .2:l I:: . ro ~ p'" c:l ti b/) 0 N
V ...... ...... I=: 8 ... Q) I=: '" ro.o .- 0 ::l _ ......0 r-. ,_, '"d;> l:l .... ._ ~ .:::
...... en en @ .t;... r-.~ 1::: .... Q) .~ 8 Q) ~'S 0 Q) ro Q) v 8 '0 ::. U .0 '"d 0.- v I"-j I=: Q) 0 >...c: l:l I:
~ >'~I:: .c: c;j Q) 0 ~ "i: ~ ro en '"d .... .......0 rIl..... ~ I:: >.1--;) 0 v;> ro I:: "i: ~ ...c:: c;j '" 8 ~~.a <11.- "&Q
~ Q) ::. r-. ;;. ..... .... I=: v ro._..... rIl Q) p:::..... ro o..~ ~ en "2 _ U S Q) .... .t; ro ro,..., -0 .0 ..... 0 u.a "':a:'5! ."
>>.." ;> Q)... ro .... 8 l-o -.... 0 'v '"Cl 0 ro ~... I=:.......c:: ... en en ~ eo... ~ ~
o "'" 0:> ~ .a.~ en 0 0 I:: W It) r-. ..... 0 ~ 0 .... >. I'< -:::: ._;~ Q) U .... ... "'.';:: ..., OJ C') ""....
Q en ........ "0 ro en Q) 0 v .... ro :::"g.c: Q) < .... Q) U 0 '0 Q) l-o.'" 0 '" bD ro ...... f-) l-o ro '" Ol c:l ....
U en ~ P::: I=: U ....:-;:::..,...0 en 8 ~........ b/) ..... -5 :;. Q) I=: ro en > 0.. I:: '0 I-< -:8 ~..... "'.... ~ ~ ... ~ ",::~
o Q) ro 8 ~ - I=: ... l-o I=: . '0 S...:> Q) .... Q) ..... ..... 0.- Q) Q) ro ~ .c.... Q) o~... 't"
..,.. .... ..... ~'" 08 ..... ?J -< b/) Q) r-...c: It) 0 "0 '" b/) 0 It).-,... 0 .......s ro U ~..d '"d r-. I:: 0 1.1 ..c: OJ Q) CO
~ U ro 8 ro...... . I=:..c: 0 I:: :> b '@- I=: r-...c: ~ V 0.. f: v.c: .... ~ Q) I:: Q) :::.... l;j -; ~.. 1;; ~
..... '0 .c: l-o 0 ~ 0 1::.';:: .....::z:: Q) 0 en r-. y..;::.... .... Q) r-. 8 Q).o ..... 1l Q) Q) 1::: 0 5 0 ~ e'" c:l 0 ::l
o i;j v.E.~ ~ ::: ~ en.-.~ r-.~ v v It) .... r-. I=: .... 0 v '0 .... ,..!<: ...c:: 0 o..(j I=: ~ ~ .-"'u ~
v t; U P:; Q)..... Q) Q) c;:: Q) b/).:t: b/) ro bD::l v ro.- '"d .~..... Q) ~ ro ro .... ~ 0.. ::l ~ Q) Q) Q) 11 t!:= ~
'E ~ ,.~ ~ 0 'C >. ro 8 'B g ti P=i u:: :E .!! .:: :0 c;j :; 1l ro""" Q) 'C.~ '" ~ '0.... ~ '0 s:::: ~ ~ c:> rn 0 oj >.cO
ro ~ ~..... 0 "i: "'d ro ro u::l Q).... .-.5 ~ ~ I=: ..... 0 ~ -5 o.~ g ::: Q) "5 !=: ~....... Q):> oS Q),!2!1:: ~ l;j "It
~ v & 0 .... u ro ~ f-) .0 _ U ~ 8.o..;:...c:: -5 ~ 0 ~ r-...... r-. U ~ ro ~ S ro ro t+:: ro ~.5 bIloS 1.1 ~, 0 :::J ch
Q) U en Q).... .......... 0 >.;> b/) 1=:'- VJ 0 Q) 0 Q) Q) ,...:> . r-. Q) 8 ~ l:l III l:l::a .. C')
1.1 0 ..... '" It) I:: ::l 0 r-. Q) < ~ en ro .-._:> ro......:::: "'d..c: ......... ~ .... I-< ~ ro Q) ._ >. ~ Q) .a C')
-5~8b/)Q)-5 ^u.....~..... .c::::g-9~~~'>~1=:L..0..P:: .~~:5I::.a ~-5 l3.a~&:l~;:'
'0 .. ......:: b/).... I=:Q) g bD;> ~ 2:>^ ~.~:-;:::.;;: .t; >..... r-. Q) ~.C ::l" ::l Q) P. '0 <5 0 ro bD"'Sl ...... Q "Cl..c:: "CJ) ::'
I:: .... "'d..c: 1=:' v r::. v "'J'~ ~ ro -'..c: .... '" 0 .... ....... V '..c: .c: '<:'f.c: ::l ... ....... Q) 1.1, "", ~ "
ro 1l .B u:.a ~ ~ ..c:: :.a ~ :5 :5 Q) r-. ~ -0 ~ @ ~ ; "i: ;:j ~ @ ~ .... ~ "d .~ ~ 1.1 0 ~ a :. -5l:a '.g~/ s: ~
!=: 1:::,~ ~ ~,~ .;; :5.::: ~,~.;; g~.:: I:: ~ci5 g.~$ ~ S 2't:.i a ~ ~-S;> t:l.., 0 :::}cn,.;:I:......
2 ..E.oS .c: , 2 ~ 1.1 U r-. V ~ en ..... '0 ro .... ,v j.:;} .
" ....". ". J'~ . ~ . . I i'. .,'
~
....
ro
S
1$
:;;::
to
~
.' '.
Distributed to Beard: '.: (.~ /; "
~i=:;~n;"jJ L:i",] ;".~). -1~~::.i:..~
JOHN G. MILLIKEN
CHAIRMAN
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND,23219
February 11, 1992
CO/lt'dT'! CFi\ 8Frvft.,l,RLE
(7Jf~~ n-',
'II'
1J'1
)1/;
,,,~,,,..,.l IJU
i ~. ;:::"j L.!
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
i \
.,;: l~)\:i ;';..... \",n
, " ',,'. .-"'i ..;J~i~
1992 Spring Preallocation
Hearings for the Interstate,
Primary, and Urban Systems
County Boards of Supervisors
Dear Board Members:
The Commonwealth Transportation Board has again scheduled a series of spring
preallocation hearings for the purpose of soliciting your advice on both the
allocation of fiscal year 1992-93 funds and on updating the Six-Year Improvement
Program. A tentative schedule is attached.
This year, because of declining revenues, it has become necessary to defer
construction projects already programmed to reflect anticipated and future funding
through fiscal years 1997-98 scheduled for advertisement. This along with the
passage of the new Surface Transportation Act by the United States Congress will
offer us an opportunity to rethink and reprioritize our transportation objectives
to almost the end of the decade. Consequently, it is more important than ever
that your priorities be made known to the Board.
After final budget decisions are made, we plan to prepare estimates of
allocations to be available for the six-year period. Ye also plan to send you
those estimates so you can have an idea of the fiscal situation we face and adjust
priorities accordingly.
The preallocation hearings will be confined to the Interstate, Primary, and
Urban Systems and to mass transit. Secondary System hearings will be held
separately with the resident engineers.
Your active participation in previous years' hearings has been invaluable to
the Board in the selection of construction priorities and your comments are
critical this year.
As usual, our district administrators
of the meetings.
will rdvise
sincJrely,
i
you further of the details
Attachment
cc: Commonwealth Transportation
Board Members
County Administrators
District Administrators
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 5T CENTURY
.
District
Fredericksburg
Suffolk
(will be divided
into three
phases)
Salem
Bristol
(will be divided
into three
phases)
Staunton
Culpeper
Northern Virginia
Lynchburg
Richmond
SCHEDULE
1992 Spring Preallocation Hearings
Location
Tappahannock/Essex Fire Department
Route 627 (Airport Road), approx.
0.4 mile west of Route 17 in
Tappahannock
District Office
1700 North Main Street (Route 460)
City of Suffolk
District Office
Harrison Avenue north of Main
Street and east of VA 311
in Salem
Virginia Highlands Community College
Route 372, which intersects with
Route 140, 0.5 mile north of 1-81
at Exit 7 in Abingdon
District Office
Commerce Road (Route 11 Bypass)
just north of Staunton
District Office
Route 15, 0.5 mile south of
Route 3 in Culpeper
Fairfax City Hall
City of Fairfax
District Office
Route 501, 0.26 mile south of
intersection Routes 460 and 501
south of Lynchburg
District Office
Pine Forest Drive off Route 1,
one mile north of Colonial Heights
Date
March 20
March 23
March 24
March 27
March 30
March 31
April 1
April 7
April 8
Time
10:00 a.m.
Beginning
at 10:00 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
Beginning
at 10:00 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
Distributed to Board: Z' Z f ' ? L
Agenda Item No.
'c ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
('CUNY\! OF ;l.Lf35MARtt:
m-" ! "'-, l..~;" ,c;..;,"'.' "'.
..", I,J".I>):~..,[OJ,!.-:-...:w...,,,,r;::J"['._,'l1l1,."""'" ,-".' ',~".,,",..,'
Jf' .. . . ~~'~~:' ~'
, n;~, F'F~' ~;',~/ [0' ;j;!) , , ; I
I r:. I,; , (; ,ti"" to ) >c. ' .
1.:'! : ',::'","", . ,
l, , I" l ".~,".., . '..,' '
',," ""'~,:J t..~,1 [C-~Jc.;
, ''',.' --.." "u"1 .....1,
~DU..\)\'V OF ~;(N~E'Rt/1~RS
\..:'L"'''':Cl
Date:
March 4, 1992
Aqenda Item #:
q;;, 07;01. /10
Title: Six-Year primary Road Plan.
Issue: Approval of six-year primary road plan recommendations.
Backqround: The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) spring
pre-allocation hearing is scheduled for March 31, 1992 at Culpeper
at which time Board recommendations are presented to the CTB.
Discussion: Upon approval of primary road recommendations and
priority issues, staff will prepare a draft statement for
presentation to the CTB. This statement will be available for your
March 11th meeting.
Recommendation: None; for discussion.
Staff ContactCs): Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg and Benish.
RWT,Jr/dbm
92.031
Attachment
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Bob Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
f:P-VlJJ'-
V. Wayne Cilimberg~irector of Planning and
Community Development
DATE:
February 25, 1992
RE:
Six Year Primary Road Plan
Attached please find the Planning Department's
recommendations for projects to be considered by the Board of
Supervisors in their comments at the Virginia Department of
Transportation's annual preallocation hearing for
improvements to the interstate and primary system. It is my
understanding that this hearing will be held on March 31, 1992
at 10:00 a.m., in the Culpeper District Office.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
VWC/DBB/j cw
ATTACHMENT
cc: Dan Roosevelt
COUNTY OF ALBE~,AJ\RLE
r-,."',,', '-')
fil" , . ~1
t " ,1
t
1'-
~
~
!t
FE8 2'"' lOCO
.~
u
EXECUTIVE OffiCE
. . ,
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SIX YEAR PRIMARY ROAD PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION
On Marchll, 1992, the Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) will conduct its annual prealloction hearing in
Culpeper for improvements to the interstate and primary
system for the Culpeper District. For your information all
roads with route numbers below 600 are primary roads (i.e.,
Route 29, Route 240).
The Six Year Primary Road Plan process differs from the
Secondary Road Plan process in that a specific amount of
funds are set aside for secondary road projects in the
County, whereas funds for primary road projects are
allocated for each construction district, and all road
projects proposed within all localities of the district
compete for those funds. The Culpeper District includes
Albemarle, Culpeper, Fauquier, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa,
Madison, Orange and Rappahannock Counties.
The purpose of this review process by the Board of
Supervisors is to recommend which County projects to include
in the Primary Plan for the District. You will find
attached to this report a copy of the projects listed for
the urban and primary system for the Culpeper District in
the existing six Year Primary Road Plan (Attachment 1).
The staff submits the following comments and recommendations
for projects to be considered by the Board in their comments
for the VDOT public hearing.
1. Place the highest priority on undertaking
Charlottesville Area Transportation Study (CATS)
projects which are eligible for the Primary Program.
2. Undertake these projects in sequence as called for in
the joint resolution between the City, County, and
University dated February 2, 1992 and agreed to by
VDOT. Widen Route 29 North from the northern corporate
limits of Charlottesville to the South Fork Rivanna
River. This project should include interchanges at
Hydraulic, Greenbrier and Rio Roads as considered
necessary in the Route 29 North Corridor D.E.I.S. At a
minimum, the necessary right-of-way for the
interchanges should be acquired with the initial
widening project. This project is considered the
highest priority.
In relation to Route 29 North improvements and as
considered necessary in the D.E.I.S., construct the
Meadow Creek Parkway. Request that the Virginia
Department of Transportation evaluate development of
, .
the Meadow Creek Parkway as a primary road if this will
provide the most immediate funding opportunity.
Construct Meadow Creek in accordance with the
recommendations of the County's Comprehensive Plan.
This is considered a high priority.
3. Close Route 29 crossovers consistent with the
previously endorsed priorities (Attachment 2). This
priority list of closings is based on the "Route 29
North Corridor study", adopted by the Board on May 10,
1979 and reaffirmed by the Board of Supervisors at its
meeting on November 8, 1989. To date six of the total
13 recommended for closure have been closed. Of the
remaining seven, three will be closed as part of the
Route 29 widening project. Funds should be provided to
close the remaining four crossovers.
4. continue functional planning work on Route 20 South.
Initial functional plans are under a second review by
VDOT staff. Particular emphasis should be placed on
the impact of improvements to the Route 20 South
corridor as it is designated a State Scenic Byway and
County Scenic Highway.
5. Improve the alignment of Route 240 from Route 250
northward to Route 810 in Crozet including improvements
to the CSX railroad underpass.
In response to previous requests by the County,
functional plans have been developed for Route 240 from
Route 250 north to Crozet and east to Route 250. The
plans call for improving the horizontal and vertical
alignment of the road for both north-south and
east-west segments. Both segments would be 24 feet
wide with two lane roads.
The proposed Route 240-Route 250 connector road
recommended in the County's Comprehensive Plan should
be considered as an alternative to upgrading the
existing alignment of Route 240.
6. Widen Route 250 West from Emmett Street to Route 637 in
Ivy. The Charlottesville Area Transportation Study
(CATS) recommends that Route 250 be widened to a four
lane divided road from the Route 29/250 Bypass to Route
688, and to a four lane undivided road from Route 677
to Route 637. The Plan also calls for Route 250
Business (Ivy Road) to be widened to four lanes with a
flush median (center turn lane) between the Bypass and
Emmett Street. The final design of the improvements in
this area is important as a gateway to the County,
City, and University and should reflect the design
priorities as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and
the Lewis Mountain-University Heights Neighborhood
Study. This segment is the highest priority of the
Route 250 West improvements.
These improvements are recommended as Phase II
improvements in CATS. While currently not considered a
high priority by the County, strong consideration
should be given for the inclusion of these projects in
the six Year Primary Plan for ultimate funding and
construction. All projects in the County recommended
as Phase I improvements in CATS are already programmed
for development in either the six Year Primary or
Secondary Road Plan.
7. In coordination with the City, County, and University,
develop design plans for the widening of Fontaine
Avenue (Route 29 Business) from the 1-64 interchange to
Jefferson Park Avenue (JPA). This would include the
segment in the City from the corporate limits to
Jefferson Park Avenue. This improvement is recommended
as a Phase IV project in CATS. CATS recommends
widening the road to four lanes. Currently, Fontaine
Avenue carries 12,980 vehicle trips per day.
Development of the University Real Estate Foundation
property for office and service related uses is
anticipated to generate over 5,700 additional vehicle
trips. With the development of the UREF office park
development, the coordination of improvements along
Fontaine from 1-64 to Jefferson Park Avenue in the
primary and urban system are essential.
8. Conduct a systematic study of Route 250 East from the
Interstate Route 64 interchange to the Fluvanna County
line, with particular attention given to the segment
from the interchange to the Rivanna Village. Due to
the potential for increased growth in this area and the
designation of the Rivanna Village that would be served
by this road, there will be increasing traffic demands
on Route 250. This study should provide
recommendations for road improvements that will be
needed to maintain an adequate level of service.
9. Conduct a systematic study of Route 20 North from Route
250 East to the Orange County line. Current traffic
counts indicated that there are 3,100 vehicle trips per
day on this road. There are numerous locations with
substandard design, including intersections with
insufficient site distance and existing alignments not
meeting vertical and/or horizontal curvature standards.
10. Develop a priority list of spot safety improvements for
primary routes. This list would be developed by County
staff and VDOT resident engineers and would be used to
request improvements in future six Year Primary Road
Plans.
11. The County continues to recommend the construction of
an interchange on Interstate Route 64 at Avon Street.
.. ,
.A TT ACHMENT 1
~
~
d
a
~ CZ)
~ z
~~ t'- 8
u~ 9' ~
,~ ~ _ ~ u
~~{/}O\ a
CZ) >~ ~ ~
~ oQ..c:: ~
o IV' '0 OJ) <
IV' ~ {/} ::s
~ ~-g 0 IV'
~~~..t= ~
~~O...<
~ ZE5 C'l ~
~ c 0\ l"""'
~ at:=- I
~ ~ ~ ~
U~ 0\ <
U 0\ U
:::> ~ en
~ ~
~ ~
en
Z
a
u
.'...........'...'.'.,..'.
.................. r-- M
I 00 ~ -
- - r-- S
M - \0 ~
" " " "
M r-- - \f')
0\ - r--
...,...,'E!"
:::::::;:;:;:::;::::;, .::-::;.::
...................................
...................................
..................
...................'...............
, , r-- ~
::::":':'::::::::':l$f 00 \0 00
:}}::::'i:CK: ~ - ~ ....-4 r--
!!!]::::::::::::::::\B: 00 ~ ....-4 00
" " "
\0 M M
::}}:rro\ ....-4 ....-4
:::}::r:,:O\
.....~'
i~i~~~~~~1ii~\~~)j\~if\r~j
\0 M 00 - -
~ ~ 00 r-- 0
0" 0 ~ 0\
" "
\0 M ~
....-4 ....-4
, .....
,
:11:li!I:I!:llillllll~. ~ M M M ....-4
~ \D \f') \D 0\
r-- 0\ 0\ r--
" " "
1::I:I:.lili:i:I'!i!~.. \f') ~ -
- -
:):ffftt'
C"l ~ r-- ~ ....-4
~ \D C"l 0\ l/')
00 0\ 0 r-- <""l
" " ..
\f') C"l C"l
....-4 ....-4
o
~
o ~ \0 ~
00 00 r-- 0\
M 00 \D r--
" " "
\f') C"l ....-4
....-4 ....-4
00 00 M \0 ~
0\ r-- r-- N r--
N.. -.::t 0 00
.. "
M N 0
....-4 ....-4
~
......
(/)
U.l ~ Z
~ ~ ~
< ~ < ~
~ ~ 0
(/) z u
~ < < z .....
U.l ::E 0 ....J
~ U o::l
~ P2 :::>
z U.l
..... ~ :::> (/) ~
w
w ...
u W
xo....J
<1-0. , , , . , ,
... ....J ~
U <
- CD U
'"
...
VI CO COCO
- ~ ~~
0 P"-
O-
'"
w -0 ,
0. ~
w
0. ~
....J
a
-0 -0-0
-0 ~ ~~
~
~ , , ,
Vl ~
~
-
...
00; ~ ~~
g ~ ~~
II'
....J ~
....J
< ~ , , ,
0 ~
w ~
I-
U
W
..,
0 N NN
'" ~ ~~
n;- ~
~
'" , , ,
~
~
0 00
'" ~ ~~
~
N 0 . 0
& - ~
~ 0 0
~ II' II'
., X X
... It\ CO
:E~~ ~ It\ 0 It\ 0 CO COCO
~ ... ~ - '" 0-0-
W - ....J- N ..:. 0
~8g~ <... 0- ....
=>< , \ -0 \ -0
>-'" >- t;g ~ 0- 0
UlO"............ & ~
0 00;....J 8
wt- ::l ....J ...
.....:z~L.. <
<w ,s;; 0 C
I-X ...
VI~"
~ ~~ ..... It\ It\ co
ClO W ~ ~ It\
...'" >- -IZWOU N
za..z:..... _oc::ZCX: 0< '"
_XI- 00-=>3 - -
.= ~~iS""VI
....w
~ '"
VI
3ii 0 It\
~ ~
--
>0
wx
"'=>
0.....
'"
W
W
... x
~ -
CI
U x
0 ~ 00
w 0 , It\ It\ 0 0
... CI coco "''''
~ x
-
X
... X ~ It\
VI < N N
W ....J 0 0
c.. w:azo 0 w::axo 0
o..c.::u..... ... Q.DCUt- ~
~ >-
'"
- ~ ~ !
... ....J
c.. - -
- ... ... <
'" i i ...
u ~ 0<0
Vl .---1-
W '" U (
0 x x -
VI '"
... ... ...
- - J< VI
)( )( t> -
W W x 0
>- ~ ~ ~
I-
- ::c - "i .-
wuw..... J< J<
.............o..~ ... ... ...
3>->-X U U U
...t-W i: - i:
"'a ....J ...
0 ... ' ... ...
., OIl .,
U ~o ~o - ' ~..' .',~ ...........
"
- - ~......._,t...-4Loo
\0
M
~~..~~i ij~JI:~:
.....
~ :ii
~gl 0 . . . .
....
U
-
DC 0 0
....
lit 0
- "" ao 11'\
Q 0. -0
DC i 0 . 0 0
.....
0..
..... ....
0..
-J
a 0 0 0
11'\ ~ as
~ 0
,.; .
. ....
~ . I 0
lit ....
~
-
.... 0 ~ 0
g ~ 0 0
~ ~ ~ ....
-J . N
-J . ....
< ~ 0 .
Q ~
..... ....
....
U
.....
-, 11'\ 0 0 0
0 0
DC "" N 0 ;::: 0
0.. ~ .... N N N
0. . N
. ....
"" 0
~. .... .... .... ....
.... "" ~
0 0 0 0 0
II'l II'l II'l II'l II'l II'l
"". . . . .
~ ~ 0 (; ~ (; .... 0 (;
0 0 0 0
"" .... ~ N .... N -0 N N .... N
0. . :Jl :Jl :Jl :Jl :Jl
0 .... DC "'. "'.. "" DC. "'. "'.
N "". . .
~ ~ .... .... .... ....
0 0 0 0 0
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
. ..... ..... ..... ..... w w
... 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. ~-
.. I"-
ffii~~ ~ ~ N :g
! 0 .... 0 0 .... 0 N
I"- .... .... .... 0 .... I"- lit .... (I)
-J_ N 11'\ . ,;, 0 "" . . .... 0
.... >- ~.... 0. "" 0 0 N N
cnDC~"" . N N "" "" "" 0 0
>-0..0 U~ g: 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0
lit ;, . ,;, . ,,:,. , ..
....1... <.... "" II'l II 0 0
~i~~ .... .... 0 0 .... .... N N
< 0 0 0 ~ 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
ctfil w ~ ~ 0 0 0 0
0.. G1t.c: ~ ......2.0U ~ <5 I"- :;:;
~.... ---zat: .... (I)
Q~ai2~ N ... ... ..... (I) ... (I) w
-c .... ~ ::<:
:: 5!:;).......... .... ....
... DC
lit
i3~ N .... -0 II'l
:g 0 ;::: co
>0 II'l
N . 0 "".
.....z
Do::;)
0.. ...
'"
..... ~\2~;8
w
.... z --~,....
~ -
ct
Z
Q ~
..... ONON OOO~ 00,00 :8~g:;: 001/'\1.1'\
.... ct :C:8~~ ~~18.... ~",,~~ """--0-
~ Z 0.\1\0'" ....~1I'l
. . . .
z ~~ ....co.... ........ --"4'''''''
.... Z .... ;8 ~ ........ -0
lit < I"- ~ N .... ....
..... ...I .... (; N 0- ....
0.. w:JlzO ~ UJ::azo w3::z0 .... w=-zo II'l w:'ZO ,.., w:Xxo 0
Q.QCU~ ~ t:LOCUt- .... ~Ol:: u.- .... 0..<<(.)1- N O.."'u..... N a.. a::: u.... ....
~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ... ...
01 g> g> g> :J ~ ~
e 0
~ III III III III '" '" (I) ... .c- ~
... ... L.. L.. (I) IIlC ...~ ~ .c- .c-
- "'0' 0 "'0' "'0 .c- o .c- < 1Il~ :J... - ... ...
.... III ... III III .. ... 0.. ~~ o III - :J 5
0.. ~"E~~"E~ ~"E~~"E~ L,.U)L,.tn >- N(I)L.. .- 0
acno(/) a) ~1Il8. > (I) (I)
'" III :JlIllC IlIC IlIC ~~~ ~ ..a):Jl III 0
U III III ._ III ZZ ~... ~ III III
en ., 1.......4.1 &........ GlL.-IQ,lL.....J 000....1"- ~- 0 ... GlM \\I""
..... :: i >-:: 8. >- :: 8. >-:: 8. >- -CQ-co t--NO- .......-u ... -\1'\-\1'\
Q zen ~:E III 0 .- ,-
:E ....:E8..... X 8.....:E 8."" X~:E~ w :z 4f.c: 4J .c- ...- X~:E~
1I'\-~1I'\-5 a::w.............., QC 0.. ......._ L,. ... ...
1I'l-~"'-~ -......~, ~~~~~ .:JSIlI -r:JCO:J
.;, .;, . :J . ::l 0 '11'\ '11'\ ......N o._~ .0 .0
NUUOUU Nt.JU,"""UU 0-0- :J:UJoczoc ....c_(/)....JU ,...,c.:::,..,...a:::
~ "tl ~
>- ~g ... 5 >- ~ ,-
.... CIl III III ,., .... ~ III III c"E ~ L.. ~
- X .... ~ l5 :. .;:; ~ a) 5'- :Jl ~ 1Il- ~~"E
.....u......... - - . .... >-en c... ~~~::: cu - a:J.... G.-'- ....-
.........o..ct L..- .- ... Do:Cll '- L..~_ :E - ~e:E - Cll- ex
i3>->-z 8.~ x i~~~ :E ~.~...c5"E ~lIlgCllO:E "'~l5 CIl L.Q.I cu~
............. ~ .~~..J......-o j> L....JN j ~ -.; .~ ~
"'Z -J 8.-.; N 0 ~.... CIl 0.-...... .
i3 CIlCll N .., ~~ 0 0 CIl ~.c-. I L....... (I) co I L........... 0>>0
0_ L.. N .-......-1:1 .... ~ OIl" 0,- ~~ ~ 3 o-g.gt:::
U :JCll :J . ~ U'\ IV co ;; I"- III l5'-
""uo.. ,."UN...,.:z _u..U..JZ _U-NZ a:: N..c;-(/)Ut- N<-N><
r--
C")
-_._-~
...
u
ex
...
VI
o
ex
w
0..
w
0..
a
~
III
L
CI
~::
:EIXO"-
~8Q~
en IX.... u..
>-0..0
III ~
"'IIlL
~~"B-z
<:ECI
:EW~N
-> 0.
exo >-
~IX.ct.L
0.....
:E
-e
w
W ...
U W
:>:0--'
<"'0..
~ ~
'" U
VI
~
...
<
g
--'
--'
<
o
W
...
U
W
....,
o
ex
0..
~
--'-
oe:...
::><
rig
<--'
--'
<
o
Clw W
-IZOCOU
- --XCI'
OO::>::>~
02: 0 t.L
<::>W.....
.... ex
VI
B~
>0
wx
1><::>
0......
~
u
o
W
~
...
VI
W
~
...
0..
I><
U
III
W
o
>-
...
_ x
wUwt-
t-.......o..CJ
B~~~
I><~ --'
"
0.
,
-0
g:
-0
0.
,
&
~
,
-r
g:
-r
0.
,
""
g:
'"
0.
,
N
g:
....
N
~
g:
....
It
I><
W
W
Z
""':O!::!
Cl
z
~
Cl
:z
x
x
<
--'
0..
w:XXO
a..OCU....
s
...
~
IIlN
LN
..'"
...
e..
:~
<I><
~
-... .c
"''''001
11I"601-
N" III
-.s::~ ...
.,- ~ i ~ ~
Q>~OLOCl
IC~Z~1-6J
of~c:Ja:-~
Nou-a-o
'"
'"
co
....
o
'"
z
,
o
....
W
0..
'"
....
III
~
,
o
N
o
o
III
W
x
0"''''0
o--.rCON
....O'N
"
'"
'"
o
....
w:XZO
~OCU'"
...
III
CI
w
~~:6
1><-
:11:"
3":~
11I01><
...
"'2::
CI.c
o
""CI
. ~.g~
CI- ~
~S';.c
o
o
'"
'"
N
'"
~
N
o
-.r
N
o
-r
....
....
~
-r
~
III
o
'"
....
o
SI
I><
o
....
W
0..
N
....
....
~
.
o
N
o
o
VI
I><
0000
~R;::N
NO.",
....
(;
~
W:XZO
CLOC::U....
.c
...
L
o
Z
.
III
..
.....
......
ClO
L_
8.~
L.c;
Ou
U
'"
.c;..."
~O__
LE-
0'--
Z--'>
1Il~
::~~]
I_Cl"""'O
(I) - c... Ooc:
.z~~:II: 8.i: 0
L.E_to-c...CI_
00_0- .O.ca::
Z-I>-UU"""
"
-0
"
-0
.Ii~
0--'- CI
N<:X--,
:II:
CO
o
'"
'"
-.r
o
'"
-r
'"
-r
"
N'
o
~
~
'"
..:
'"
o
....
0.'
'"
o
....
-.r'
'"
'"
-0
o
~
N'
o
o
0.
....
o
'"
,
....
o
SI
I><
o
o
'"
o
....
W
0..
0.
....
....
.
N
o
o
Ri
o
.0
o
o
'"
III
'"
~
",'
'"
-.r
N
N
0000
'" 0 0 &on
Ntt\'Io()-
N"'CO
N
'"
N
w:XxO
CLGCU..-
.c;
...
L
~(I) E
..c:....... G
.....-- >
c... I!:_ 0_
0_0_' GI::
Z--'>
1Il~~
: ~~] 5
_Cl.....O"'-
- '- 0 a.::
:II: 8.i: 0 ~ ;
": 5~~ ll.~
_uu.....,cna.::
III
..
".0
_0
.Ii~
o-__CI
N<:X--,
-
-
:II:
t-
N
o
'"
N
o
SI
ex
N
o
....
W
0..
0.
....
.
N
o
o
Ri
o
.0
III
go.~~
Oa!i"'N
_NO.",...
....
~
~
w:XZO
n-a:::u.....
-E
CI
>
I>< ]
~ 0
L '"
o
..... ...
L
~~&.
ll~.:
11I"'<
III
"
.0
"
-0
I Ii ~
~-...II
N<::a--,
:w;
'"
o
'"
....
'"
g:
-.r
o
o
t-
'"
'"
N
o
o
N
o
'"
'"
N
'"
N
....
&
CO
,
....
o
'"
o
SI
'"
(;
....
W
0..
o
o
....
W
0._
N
N
....
.
N
o
o
Ri
~
co
C""l
....
N
....
.
N
o
o
Ri
~
'"
It\
It\
It\
III
....
t-
-.r
It\
'"
N .
~
. N
~
",'
'"
~
, '"
-0
0-
'"
....
'"
W:XZO
Q"Oll:u.....
..
u C
~ ...;
Irc.....u.
W _LU.GI
-I .........
:: -.;t;:a~
1;; "1~"'2'"
W ttI"
... .....
~.;; OO;!,
~cn&...~&...L
Dl:.c-!S,fJII
~~~6Jt~
umwlIlu<
III
"
-
:II:
0-
,.,
"....
->-
,l~
0--0.
N<....
,,~~ ._;;:(~~~>,'.~ :.;:~~iiit:\t~1'8~
...
U
Ill:
...
en
-
Q
Ill:
W
a.
w
a.
-I
i3
. ....
III
L.
.
ffi~~~
...8 >-
cnot...~
>-a.o
en ::J
"'~L.
>- z J:.
~~ ...
~~i~
A.GIC.cu.
a. ...
~c:
-
....
Q
-I~~O~
---zo:
Q~li~j;l
~~l:il.....lil
en
a~
>0
~~
......
:c
WUWt-
..........0..(.3
:::I>->-Z
0.......1.1.I
IlI:Z -I
S
w
~ :;:;
~el
en
~
-
g
-I
-I
<
Q
w
...
U
w
...
o
Ill:
a.
~
~;:
ug
<-I
-I
<
~
Q
w
...
~
...
en
w
~
-
...
a.
-
Ill:
U
en
w
Q
>-
...
.....
00
~
...
~
00
,
&
...
~
~
&
cr-
'"
&
'"
00
,
'"
&
...
'"
00
.
&
'"
w
W
Z
0000
~~~:a
..: "'...,......
<:>
:z
~
<:>
:z
-
:z
:z
<
-I
...
w:azo
CL&::ll:Ut-
C
.~ ,..
... L.
~:8.
~~8.
.,.--
"'fIl:J
C:JU
-al
-
..cOo 0
...'"
~1I-5
en...~
...~en
<0<....
..
01
...c
L.~"
8.di
, 8....~ ~
- ...
00:J C
NUU-
Il'I
'"
00
>-
<Il'I
:....
o<~
W
'" ...
,:zo
:::IIl'I
U
! ...'
-0
tSl
:::10<
0<
... ...
enO
!~
ua.
.....
o
...
.
~
o
~
~
o
o
'"
..:
Il'I
'"
...
N
~
~
Il'I
~
~
Il'I
o
Il'I
~
o
~
...
o
;:!
","
'"
...
Il'I
","
O.....~'"
~Il'Ia!ilC
"Il'I
co
...
"
~
w:aZo
Q"Cl:Ut-
...
fIl
..
wfll
...
....-
"'Ell
ca.--
W-I-
,
fIl
L.
II
.JJ.
t;~
..0<
:.....
"'II>
~fO'~e-8
._ """._ L.. L..
X:l~X8.~
~~="15~
Oo<>",uen
II
x
CO
o
-
II
~==
. t~~
,..,..L.CO<<l
,."CJQ....J
...
o
Il'I
...
o
Sl
0<
...
o
...
w
...
Il'I
o
...
.
()o
'"
o
.
'"
'"
~
...
0000
0000
"'Il'I.....1l'I
"''''
"
()o
....
'"
W:':zo
Q.O:::Ut-
...
'"
II'"
:....
U; ...."e
en cn._
<11-1 ..
~:'II 2
COCU~ICU
-.. >
..co_LoCO"'::
en X 8.'"
- '--8
a--:15~>-
...IOU...J...J
'"
II
~ C
a a.~
:...
"'.....u
:~o<.3
. '5~ ~:J:
"'0 ....
'''...IN...J z:
x
'"
'"
o
Il'I
Il'I
o
o
o
g
...
...
o
o
Il'I
Il'I
o
'"
Il'I
Il'I
"
'"
Il'I
~
...
o
Il'I
...
o
Sl
0<
...
o
...
w
a.
:g
...
.
"
Il'I
o
.
'"
'"
o
o
en
:a~~~
"'Il'ICO.....
"''''
Il'I
~
o
...
...
w:.:zo
o..c.:::u....
en....
en '"
<II"
a.;zw
~~G.J""
>-....
< < '-
en x..
af~~
-J-Jocc
'"
II
~ a
a a.~
:...
"'.....u
....0<0
IIlC -I
"5~~:z
"'0 ....
I""t....N...JZ
:E
--:
...
~
~
o
~
o
o
'"
..:
o
~
o
o
...
o
o
...
~
","
'"
'"
'"
o
Il'I
'"
o
'"
:.
0<
'"
o
...
w
a.
:g
...
,
~
Il'I
o
.
'"
'"
o
o
en
~g~~
......'"
~
<5
w:.:zo
Q.QCUt-
...
...
'"
..
...
:J
"0 CJ)
oeo< L.
~ C E
a.~ CO.:
........N u
U -0 '-
LA... 61 L.._
o ~l2 2
ii!.., '-41
iSc",...>
1--""""""'::
~
C
'-
:J
-...
..-.
Ill.....
. '5 t; ~ ~
"'oc.-..
""...J-a::...J
:E
co
o
~
'"
...
o
Il'I
...
o
'"
:a
0<
,
...
o
...
W
0..
~
...
.
~
Il'I
o
.
'"
'"
o
o
I
en
OCONO
'" "'1l'I
Il'I
o
CO
()o
w3:z0
Q.cxu....
.. C
oeo
en.-
-...
Z3~
-''''CO
'-0
.....'"
0'"
C II
2-'"
~...~
>-<0<
, ..
"'01
COCC(QC(,/)
0'" II'-:J
N'- L.. c,-
.......:J u '-"'0
",OC:J<lI
t"'l...J-t-cx
1
...
o
Il'I
...
o
'"
:a
0<
"
...
o
...
W
0.._
",.
o
...
,
~
Il'I
o
,;.,
'"
o
o
0\
C'"l
'"
o
Il'I
~
o
CO
()o
w
w ...
u w
xo-,
<...0.. . . .
-' ~
... <
u '" u
-
'" lie
...
Vl
- .... N
0 0- ",'
'" .0 .
w g: . . .
0..
w ~
0..
-'
=>
U
0
-0 0
0- VI
.
~ . . . . I
Vl -
~
-
...
< 0 0
l5 0 0
-' ~ VI ~
-' .
< -3' . . I
0 g:
W -
...
U
w ~
-,
0 0 0 0
"" 0 O. 0 :a
0.. -3' a:l a:l
0- ~ . - ....
'" . . ~ ~ 0 ~
-0 I
g: "'. g). g) g)
. .
- N ~ - ~ ~
0 0 0 0
VI VI VI VI 11'I
0 N' 0 . . .
~ 0 - 11'I ~ 0 ~
0 0 0 0 0 -3' 0 0 0
'" In ~ .... ~ "'. ~ "'!. ~ -3' ~
~ .:,
N "" "'. ~ "'. ~ '" '"
. '" .
g: N ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
~ 0 0 0 0 0
<Il ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
L. W W ~ W W W
III n. n. N n. n. CL_
X~ In In I. N In 0
<~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 In 0 In --
X a:: Or-- a:l -- -- .... -- :::J -- N --
~8O~ -'- N I"l ~ . . I"l . . I"l I
<... 0- ~ I"l '" . N ~
(,I)a::.....~ ~g , N N -- 0 11'I
>-n.O g: 0 0 . 0 0 0 0
Vl :J , , , lb .:, N
...<IlL. -<-' -- -- --
~~"E~ -' -- - -- ~ In N
-< N N N N N 11'I
~ffi::lN 00 00 0 0 0 0
;Ei~~ 0
Cl w w 0 ~ Ie 0 0 11'I
Q. QC..c...... -JZa::OU :8 ... .... -- ~
n.... - --2", a:l "- ~ ~
X O~5~B en N en "" ... en ...
-c ~=>w"-en I"l g) N ~
-
'"' ...'"
en
B~ ~ ~ I"l I"l ....
0 In N ....
-- .... 11'I .... 00 11'I
>0 I"l' . . 00.
wZ ~ 0-
"'=>
CL ...
'"
w Ie::::R~ 00-- O.-Ntt\ II'IO....N
w p:~~Ri &-3'0..... ;;~~ce
... Z N....OON 0---0
8 Cl _..~~ 11'I00 ....o-~ -"~"......'"
Z ~
0 ~
w 881e1e lell'll"ll"l
... Cl -3'ON
~ Z I"lNI"la:l N 11'I co
- . .
- z '" I"l NN
..... Z
Vl -< 0 N I"l -- N
W ..I ~ -- ~ 00 -0
CL w::szo '" w::szo ~ w::szo w::szo w::szo -- w::szo --
a..Gl::Ut- N o..a::Ut- N 0.. 0::: u.... Q.O::Ut- 0- 0... a:: u..... I"l 0.. 01: u.... ..,
<Il
....
'" 'E
, , ~ ~ - ,
~ .. ..I ,
L. L. L. ;"E ~ .r. IJ '-- .. ..
- ...... .. .. t ~ 8.:::: ..~ .z: .... - .r;
... en>....> ....>.... g:~ ....~ .........
CL CI- cn- (1)'- en ';';~8.8.~ Ill- llL.L.L-
- wac CD: III '" ., L.> en8.~~
'" w w W ~<IlL.:;~ 8.~
u ::~..~ ..~..~ ~~> ..~i:..~
Vl -.. ou.- 5:::~
w -~-.... _...._U'\ < .. ",~u '" -u _N
0 X ~'i ~ i: ~'i .. x-.- <Il uo ...-
<:J~ -'XL....&- ~.. E..c....s:U
.... g;u ~ w ....._ CO .... L. .... ..- ....
1"l>1"l> "1~U;~ NI"lL.E" ::l~ ~ ~~.!~5
.0 .0 -C.... 1:1'- .c: .O-:Z
NUOU OUO'" OC:<LI.....J :C"""Z...J"" WU'" OZ..lO'"
...~ ~
>- ... "E -
.... ~~ .. ~Z .. .... .... "'2" .. .. ..
- :z: .. .. :L.I L. 1 ..Z..-8' .. ~ ..
wUW.... ~ - - -
...........Q.CJ - - ;::~CI)~ - L- X
B>->-Z .... X ., 8-" X 8..~ .. U X ..
........W J;:- 'i-~ i"U 'j_~al ,:::~~
"'Z ... I &ii 0 ~ . 8.H''' t .g~ 0; ":
B N ..., o ~~t -.,
__ L. __ >..1 N -- -]- ~:i'L 2- .... ~8-:'~ 11'I
--.,., --.... .....jIJL 11'I..... ..
N'" CL N"'O~ NU.....COa::: NUCO'" NtCC""'U. II'I...N'"
o
-:r
W
W ...
U W
zO.... , , , . I
~...~ .
...
U
DC ~ 0 ~ -0
... 0 ~
In 0 0 N
.... .... N
0 0.
DC ~
W
0..
W ....
0..
....
a ~ 0 ~ co
0 ~
0 0 N
~ .... N
,
~
In .-
~
-
... 0 ~ 0 ~ co
g 0 ~ 0 N
~ .- N
....
....
.: ~
0 &
W .-
...
u
W
..., ~ 0 ~ ll\
0 0 ~
DC 0 0 N
0.. ~ .- N
0-
.
'"
&
.-
0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ll\
0 0 N
'" .... N
0-
I
N
&
,... .-
re
..
ID
xi~"" ~ 0 ~ 0 0 M
ll\ '" ~ M
W 00. ....- N .- .... ~
... >- ~... 0-
Ulll:lll:'t-IA. t;~ .
>-0..0 ~ .
In 2
>-tK].c .:....
.... ....
i~ .. .:
<<~~~ c 0 0 0
ClW W 0 0 ll\
Q..cx~u. -JZatQU 11'\ ll\ '" ~ 0 -0
0.. ... -__za: -0 ~ ll\ ~. ~ ....
X o~~~~
_c: ....
- ~:lW"'"
..... "'DC
en
a~
>0
wz
DC:l
0.. ...
DC tD
...
W c:
... Z tD
8 - !i~
CI
z 11)>-
~ ,~ II)
0 "l:l'"
... ;!&
... CI
~ z .....en
- .......
- z 8."
... z
en -< 8.8'.. 0- M N 0 0:
W .... _~8' ll\ -0 -0 -0
a.. 0- 0- 0- 0- -0
::J 0 tD M M M ..... .....
U I ..
.....0
. 5.
..,...QC
"'5 ..... ... ~ .....
~ .. "'5 c ~]
~DC'" ~ "'E~
- ~DC uC
... ]"!i "'... ...-
a.. > '" '~e
- z...~ '" "l:l..aco..
DC ..8-~ a.. I-OOL.GI
u - '" ._~......
en I- L..'_ GJ ]", "'..... ..
W ::JU=-~ '" '" co "'C n:J 41 Q
0 .......,...,...., .. - "'.. :z:.- C L.
~co....o- "l:l '" ~ "'.. .<: {J 'E ~ .8
.. c .....
t&g;g tD tJl tJl u.. en co.- :J
::J .~ .~ ..'" '- 0 - ~ 0
cn--- CI en II> DC:E :z:ocw-....
8' ~ '" ~
>- ~,- 8' ~ .. c: .. .. .. '"
... "l:l 0 "l:l "l:l "0 ...
- :z: .~ c.~ ,~ .~ ,~ c
wuw...... :x..~ :x ... :x ... :x ... :x :x ~
..........Q.CJ ....<: ... tD ... '" ... tD ... ...
a>->-z u... '" u - u - u - u u
......... ': 8"i ~ ,~ - '- - .- - '- '- >- >
DCZ .... .. tD .. '" .. tD .. .....0
e ... QI "l:l ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .......
.~ z""2'L: "':x'" "':x'" "':x'" '" .~iO ~
,~ QI C .- QI C ,~QI C ,~
otnGm cz- cz- cz- C cen-
.-1
-.:t
. ' .
w
w .....
U W
",O.J
<.....0.. .
.J ~
..... <
u m u
-
""
..... 0
(I) ~
- "..
0 0-
"" .0
w ~
0..
W ~
0..
.J
a
0
-0 ~
0-
0
&
(I) ~
~
-
.....
< 0
g ~
.J ~
.J 0
< ~
0 ~
w ~
.....
u
w
...,
0 0
"" ~
0.. ~
~
'" ,
~
~
0
~
'"
0-
0
N
~
~ -
'"
l..
.,
~::: ~ 0
X~OI"- ~
~8O~ .J- N
<..... ~
(l)0=......l,L =><
:>-0..0 t;g
VI :J ~
....."'l.. <.J
~~"Ez .J -
<
g~~~ 0
""0 >- ClW W 0
o.oc:.c""- ...JzQtou ~
0....... - __%0:: N
X 0!i52g
_c
- ~=>w......
~ ...""
(I)
a~
>0
~~
0.....
""
W
W
..... z
8 -
Cl
Z
W
0 t-
W Cl
...
~ z
-
- z
..... Z '"
en <
W .J -0
0.. N
-0
--
~ i
- u"E >
.....
0.. -000
- 00- l..
"" ~~~
u
en l.. _
W ... -::; >- i
0
&J..+,L
~L.~g
__';00l..
VI eno..
>- -8
:: "" "i
wUW~
~""",(LCJ --
a>->-z u
......... -
""g .... l..
--
III
- -
0
N
..::t
,
, . .
w
~ >-
w
>- igi
U . . .
'"
>-
en
-
0 -0
'" .... ;;;;
w 0. -0'
a. ~
w . . ....
a.
....
a ....
::J
~ 0
. -0
~ . . ....
en ....
..-- ~
-
...
... g 0 ~
0 0
zl&.l ~ .... ....
.... ....
en", .... . ..- lI\
~~ < ~ , ....
Q, &
...< w ..-
> ...
~< U
1&.1
->- ,
>- .... 0 0 ~
~HE '" ~
a. ~
"'1&.1 0.
>- '" . lI\
en '" "" . ..-
~a &
....
"--
0 ~
"" ~
0.
, lI\
N . ....
& ..-
0
,.. ..- ..-
COI W
L- a.
.
xi~"" ~ 0 ;g 0 ~
N .... 0
1&.1 00. ....- N . .... . N
... >- ~>- C?" ~ N
cn<<~'" 0 ""
>-a.o ::;g & 0 ....
en ::J . ,
...~ .. <.... lI\ 0.
>-z ~ .... .... .... N
~Ii~ < 0 ~
0
CI~ W 0 0
Q,.OCoCu. ....z"'oU N 0
i!>- - --zQC 0
O!ia~~ en ",,-
-I: ~;:)I&.I""
:: ...'"
en
a~ 0
lI\
>0 .
wz
"';:)
a.....
'"
w
w
>- Z
~ CI
~ U Z
0 ~
w o. . 0 00 I 0
~ >- CI ... ... 00 0
3 z 00 0
.... - , ,
0>- Z ....N ""
z.... >- z ""
<! en < ~
1&.1 ....
CI 0. w:azo .... w::azo
zen CLOC:U..... ..- O"'C1CU.....
-0
"'z
~~ ..
c:
z ~
-...
~~ ! ...
..> w '"
w - wO .... 0 ~
... >- ClL. ..J ....
>-0 a. ~ir :;:
'" - Gl
<>- '" ~- UJ >
zx U w '-
-CI UJ Gl .... .. >-
x- w ....'" b~~ U
-'" 0 0'" -
..J c: ..JUJL. '"
W ~'~ ao:<Gl ....
'" <a... UJ
a. x...- -
"-- ....0 UlD< 0
...
>- ~ w
x 0.
w(.Jw..... ~ '- Gl
..... ...... 0.. CJ Gl>- x --
a>->-z Ol- L."'~
>->-w Gl:!8 ..- l-:a
",z ..J ~.- c:i ..'"
S . . L.
",caw ~-~'E
",1..&...0..
-00"'" <~ca
C"'l
--r
~
.
I-
U
o<X,
I- W
V)....
_ V)
0>-
V)
0<
wz
0..<
wa:>
0..0<
-'::>
::>
u
....
CIl
~~,..
0<-0-
ClO
XOO>-
WO< ....
I- Cl......
V) 0::>
>- >- 0<
(/)Zf/)X
z~"E>-
<WGN
m>(/)o.
0<0:;)
~ClCO>-
o...c ....
XI-
c
o
ClW W
....JZOC:OU
- __%01:::
0~lj~8
~::>w....V)
....0<
V)
8~
>0
wz
0<::>
0......
UJ ....
u UJ
zo-'
<1-0..
;( ~
a:> u
'"
0-
o
II'
8:
V) _
~
I-
<
g
-'
-'
<
o
w
>-
u
w
..,
o
0<
0..
~
-'- N
<I- 0-
::>< .
tig
<-' 8:
-' ...
<
>-
~
u
o
w
>-
~
l-
V)
W
~
>-
Cl..
'"
U
V)
W
Q
>-
>-
-'
<>-
o..w
_w
u'"
->-
ZIII
i....
,..
0-
o
'"
8:
II'
0-
o
~
8:
....
~
...
~
'-
...
CIl
~
U
~
0-
o
.....
8:
'-
(J
"E
:::>
.,
.....
~
N
8:
'"
W
w
%
Cl
%
~
Cl
Z
-
%
%
<
-'
Cl..
;800'"
.....i:!O:2
..."',..
w=-ZO
0..01:(.)....
'"
W
CD
!!i
z
>-
u
w
..,
o
'"
Cl..
(J
>
<
'-
III '-E
-....m
uu
w(JC
. ..>
u 0....-
cn..,.....~
~
"'::c
0..>-
XCl
-%
w
w....
0..
>-
...
..
-
-
_<II
><11
~~
... m
'-
co
.<: II'
UN
o
o
o
o
N
II'
~
.....
'"
N
'"
II'
00
;::
II'
~~
II'
00
N
'"
'-
II
>
0'-
..
(J>
-8'';C
i ~
i~~"i
~~....~
mClC-.#'O
V)
-
-0
-
~
.....
.
...
o
...
w
Cl..
N
0'"
...0
o II'
~U
... ~
00
:C~
0'"
II
8:00.....0
.-~~~
w=-:O:O
c..oc:U....
x
V)
u
'-
..
>
0"2
..0
-8'=
'-C
CD'"
..
-
-
> .
...
....11I
o
-..
~-8'
.<:-
U'"
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
i
(JU
.g'~
';: ~
CD'"
'"
...
-
N
-
.....
N
N
o
';;;~
Cl..'"
...
~N
...0
. II'
~U
... .
oN
00
g~
:::>'"
o
o
o
o
~
~
l2
o
~
o
II'
-
-
,.,
~
00
II'
ONN'"
~(;~8:
.-NU"\aJ
w=-%O
o.oc:U....
o
...
o
... II'
~~
CD
i..:
...0
o II'
~U
... .
. ...
008
g~-o
:::>"'...
..
>
<.
....
)0.11I
'-
'-C
..-
.<:lIl
UX
<II
.. <II
- .., ~a:
'> I ~~'-'"
_ . x..
..,..., U'J-
o....cnDa::)u-
.....'11) - E
L .I/:.-CS"-
CI.t::,....a-J '"
~....Ol)lcn.
Uo._OC:NZO
V)
'"
'"
II'
N
II'
N
0000
..... .....
..... .....
w=-:o:O
o..G:u....
o
......
>
R;<
....11I
"'-
...c
. ...
'(J ...
...-
"'>
.. ...
... c
...::: ~..
l~..ti~~
:; 8.~....~ ~~
UU>>CL....:ta:ao::O
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
.....
.....
>-
-'
:z
w
Cl..
'"
...
-
,..
-0
.....
N
.
...
~..
w
Cl..
.
(;
...
o
~
N
o
N
N
II'
o
o"'~o
~. "'~ i:.
......N
w=-:o:O
0.. 01: u....
o
...
R;~
....
",...
"':.6
.....
....c
"'el
.. ....
...= i..
8.~ ~..u=
8..tlU..gt~E
:; 8.~""~ ~
ucna.....,.mGltO
o
o
o
o
o
N
o
-0
~
II'
0-
,.,
II'
II'
o
II'
~
,..
..
<II
III
.<:
0..
'"
...
o~~::
II' 0- II'
.
...
...J
,..
~
N
w:azo
O"OI:u....
.
...
o
~
'"
(;
";-~
~m
N
. .
N'"
NO
II' II'
OU
..
. >
....<
III
III
...-
.6';'
......
C-
el>
..
...
-'
ll.. ~
:; 8.~-'
UIIIo.~
N
,..
N
,.,
0-
'0#'
~
'0#'
j:!
N
o
o
-<T
.q
...
...
II'
.
...
...
o
'0#'
,~
0-
N
o
~
'"
N
..
<II
III
.<:
0.
(;
...
I
~
N
I
N-
NO
II' II'
OU
..
-'
:E
~
o
. '.
------ -
... 0
... ...
u ...
ZO....
... i"'a
u
-
"':z: 0
......
en...
_en ....
0>- 0-
en I
'" -0
...z 8:
~<
"'<0 ...
~'"
....:::l
i3
0
-0
0-
I
g:
en ...
~
... ,.., 0
g ..
~ ...
.... ..
.... ~ 1
<
0 8:
... ... u
...
u ~
...
.., ...
0 ~
'" ~ ....
~ -6
0- ...
0 ...
.... ~
8:
... u
....
0-
'"
.... N
0-
0
N
8:
...
,..,
III
...
~~
-.... ~ N
-0- N
:z: 8>- ....- N N
~... 0-
...'" ... tg 0
...~- &
en O:::l
>-... '" <....
CI):Z~:C .... ...
... ... <
~~~N
<0 ~o- 0
~'" >- ~... w '"
~:zotOU ...
~::... - __ZOIC '^
o!i~~~ ...
c ~:::l"''''''
- ...'"
....
en
i3~ '^
=0
>0 "
... x ...
"':::l
~...
'"
w -oo~o
... w ....'^~....
en x N...,....,-
8 " "
C> ...N
Z
0 w
... ~ - -
...
~ z
-
- x
... x
en <
... .... N
~ ....
...3XO ....
a..Ol:Ut- N
"
...
0
'" ...
5 w W
<0 ~
- ~
... ... N"
~ X en
0-
'" ... ... _0
u u .. o '"
en w ... -ou
w .., <II '^
Q 0 ...... ... "
'" .<: U I ...
~ gz ....0
...N
'- 0 03
3'" 0'"
>- w
... >
- 0
.... "''"'
<... ~t- ~~
~w XC> .!
-... -z ....-
u'" w ;~ 2!
-t- W.... X
xen ~ ..... ..
i..... >- ...0" .... '"
t- .....>
3lXl< ~ 0
!'..f;
.',.~
~
l'
. --"-.-T::{.;".~
~
~
~~
t~
t~
Ij~
~
~
~
H,
\~
V'
I
ll"l
~
.
w
w >- 0 0
u w
zO....
.e>-o..
.... ~
>- .e
u CD u
-
"C:E
>-w CO N -oNCO
III >- ,.., 0- ...0...
-Ill ",.. ... N NON
0>- 0-
III . N ,..,,..,
'" -0
LU Z &
o...e
WCD ~
0..'"
....~
i3
",.. CO 0:8:8
~ ",..
-0 ,.., N 00
0-
0 N "',..,
g:
III ~
...-- ~
-
>-
0- g -0 lI'I 0,..,,..,
0 r::: -0 ~~
zw ~ N
.... ..J
III CD ..J 0 NN
O.e .e ... >-
Z.... & ....
~- 0 ~
....e w ~ >-
> 0- g
~.e U :II
w
->- ..,
0- .... 0 0 W N 011 0""''''''
Uo- '" 0.. '" -0-0
~Z 0.. ... N w 0-0-
",w 0- 0.. . .
0- '" . NN
Ill", ,..,
~i3 &
U ~
-----
0 0 ONN
,.., :8:8
0- . .
. NN
N
&
~
....
<II
....
~~",.. ~ 0 0 O~~
"'-0-
x8g>- ..J- N ......
.e>- 0-
LU '" .... ~.e . NN
0-0..... t;g &
Ul O~
>- 0- '" .e....
Cl)Z~:C .... ~
LU 0- .e
zx
.e~IlN
CD ~o- 0
!!i", >- C)W w ~ CO
-IZO::OU ;j ,..,
o..c.... - --x 0::: lI'I.
xo- 0~B2a X ...
C ~~W"'1Il ~
- ....'"
....
III 0
a~ 0 ... W
,.., N >-
>'0 CO N .e
WZ g
"'~ ....
0..... ....
IX
W ,.,...o-ON >-
0- W N,.., -0 0
8 z ,..,... ",.. z
- .
CI ~ ~ III
...-- Z >-
0 ~ - z -
W will
0- Cl -00- x~
l!l ~ z :t; :t;
- ~-
... >- z ~. . ->-
i..J 0- :z: ~ >-.e
III .e ~g~
.e~ W .... ~ -0
0.. ~ .... >-
C)Ul w:IIzO lI'I w:llzO lI'I 0......0
ZO CLa::Ut- N o...<<u.... N .e.e>-
-z
"'~
w.... . .
w ~ ~
z >- 0 0
-.e '" ~ ~
C):II ~ w w w
z CD 0 0.. 0..
LU.... - ~ ....J
>-0 0- U N .
0.. .z 0 -
e<:0- - I> 0- .. .; ON
.e:c tl >- >.. _0 _0
ZCl U .ell . lI'I .11I , lI'I III
x<< Ul w "'U .. -oU ..J
W .., ~-o 0 Ul" lI'I .e
- 0 0 - . .. - . 0-
..J '" ..'" ' - ~~ ' N 0
W 0.. .. 00 0-0 0-
'" 1>0 ON 1>.... :?:~
... ....- 0:11 ....11I 0-
~ ...'" ~'" ClCl ",..'" U
'"
>- ~ I> 0-
... - .; Ul
- 0 -'U -
..J "" :c ._'" > ~ 0
.eO- 0..... > <II ~.e
0.. LU XCI I> I> III ~ '"
-LU -:z: ...... - ..>- ..J W
U'" W 0- ~E ~~ - ...
-0- W.... - .. lI'I X LU
i!e. 0.. ....C .. ........ 0.
>- ..- ..IN .....- 011 '-: ..J
0- &.U ....c i3
ux ...- :ll1Il ... 0
\0
.;:T
'\ .. ..
\..
V'~. . ,:'
I
~-"","'.".'"
~.. ..
/'
. ,,<,.
~ ~.....~ ..~_.,
....".' t:"'~
;~'!:~:
.. .~,. ""
'''' ........... ~' ......."',~,.. / . ~~~1
~",(, '~--:.-
).:\". ........"'< ,
"
~:i.
/
~
'S;
Vl
0)
I~
\,';'..~ ..
~..-
~
~
~ ~ 1
~~ ~ :;
~ c! ~ ~
rl${ ~
~_ i ~
'~~~ L, ~
'tp ~ ~ >. ~
p'~$i ~ ~
'. ~ 1 ~ E l t
~ ~~ !'i' ~
d:J. .s~u ~
<J .. i ~
~
!l
C
~
~
.
t,
o
l
..
'"
:.;:
."
c
o
'0
~
~
1 ..
It l
t,,g .5
r~ ,~
e ~ S
:.:l ~ ~
.t J C
3
~
~
,$
~
"
f
I ) (
"'l
~
~
o
~
:0.
C
o
r--
-::r
.
,."~
~
,co
'..',~,'
.Jl.r
i2~.,.'
,......"1'
,2=
..,'",,','C ','
'..~"
]
~
~
...",..'...,...'.~.",'",'
."~
,.~,'
.......
~'
,'.~'"',,,
'~""
:? .:>>:::<<::\:
.",. .......-.-:..,.,.,....:.:
,'CIJ "
" Q.c ,
=
U
~
u
:5
tI.l
. ....
Q
=
Q
+:l
, , rJJ ,.f9 ", "
, ,.., r-c " ,
= $1...
, ~ ' ~
','","~'~',','"
..:.:.........-...... ::. ,:::" ,,":,:,::.,-.",.:
..'.. '''~..c'' " "",.:, "
,,~ ' ,
I-' ','. e:=', .:' ','
"
--
"
p......
;y ,
<<t,,'
"'9J
'IJ'"
,Q)
'-
-
,..,,'...',,',.'..,.r-t.
._:,,~
" ....1:1:I
'Q;)
....
....
o
-
;;
..c::
U
~
o
>.
....
.....
U
~...
\'f<'S\on ~
/
,;;
,:
. !~ ~...
"'"
~o
~. . ","-
'>~,' o~
...,.....~~
'"
.<:
:i ..'
~
',;--
s'fIn S
-0
'0 ~
_ _ E ~
tH ~
~ r.: ~ a
~ .~ f ,!f
~~i:e
,~~ ~ a
~'; 1 ~
.~..:::: '5 1'll.!i
~.~~ ~~ >.
~':;. ~ r! Ool ~
.f~ t ,x g ~
,E ;;! ~ E :
~H fi 1
'. - ii, ;;
--.Z
<J
l'
'c ~
~.!:' >
~ 15 ~
~.2 oS
i;'.~ 15
i!:1 .-
E ~ ~
;:':.t>', ]
~ ~
$ 8
I ) (
<r
$';s
2'0'
~ I:;
..... C
u'.."
, .....
- U
.t:Q.l
,Vl Vl
-oc::
.~ ..2
..t::l..
.....::::,
.S Cll
Vl..t::
1:;....
s.::
.2"0
"OCll
I:;~
t:I l..
U "
~ ~ E
'_ "0 t:I t:
.~ r..... '-- 0
u ~ 00 ~ =
l.. U E: CI,l Cll
Q.l Cll 0. '-
..t:: '-., 0. - '-
..... C Cll ::l ell
o 5. -::: u ::
~
o
~
... i ~
Q
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
.;:
c
~
"
"
"
~
~
'"
~
s
'"
,ot
..c:
'"
o
o
.;
e
~
~
c
c
~
~
8
~
0;
~
o
~
.,t.
:5
OJ
-s
--.---
~ >, .,
'ATTACHMENT 2
Recommended priority for crossover closings:
1. *
2. *
3. *
4.
5. *
6. *
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
l3.
Dominion Drive, #9
Better Living Furniture, #l6
Kegler's, #l5
South of Rivanna Industrial Park, #33 (closed)
South of Holly Memorial Garden, #26 (closed)
North of Route 643 crossover, #2l (closed)
Fabrics Unlimited, #35
Near County Line, #45
North of Route 763 Crossover, #41 (closed)
North of Route 763 Crossover, #42 (closed)
North of Route 763 Crossover, #43
North of Route 643 Crossover, #20
Crossover at Maupin's Store, #27 (closed)
Notes:
* Along section of Route 29 North to be reconstructed.
..-
~
\...' i
._..,:1;'1
I
l
~
...~,
Edward H, Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R, Marshall, Jr
Scottsville
David P, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S, Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y, Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
March 9, 1992
Mr. Edward Eitelberg
2681-4 Barracks Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Dear Mr. Eitelberg:
Enclosed, for your information, is a copy of the Highway
Department's response to concerns raised about traffic in the
_vicinity of the Colonnades/Old Salem Apartments. This infor-
mation was reviewed by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting
on March 4. In his letter, Mr. Roosevelt suggests waiting a
period of time until additional accident data is available and
then updating the information. The Board concurred with this
suggestion.
~~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
LEN:ec
Attachment
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
COUI\!l \/ ,'. ,- .
, J~ tUil\.rr:'iV,"R '.'
~..._L'-''-'J''_ 't
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI mp:..,:,.(~[',:::'-;:~:J?JC;:~:;; (;~'l.
c.I ,{ , I I
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I r: i \ ,. F~; ): /~, 10,C;? , ' i Ii I
/", '. " .. ' ,'1. "",
P, 0, BOX 2013 ' J i \ ".._ .' , " , / i I~' , I
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902 G ;:.1 " ~_~:~) , tFj l):'R~OFE EL T
[I (IN.:'U'" {''i~ f" " MSID~l'tl'l~ ER
. I." j- ,:>U PFi;' V i;::;OC?S
Distiibuted to Board: c'. 2 f~ 'i i!/
Agenda Item No. ,'j <7 . 'j', ", ,.
.'?-, c,:U '),(7/
~ ?J. t?~~.!!f?3
February 13, 1992
Route 654, Albemarle County
Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Albemarle Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Miss Neher:
Reference is made to the request from the Board of Supervisors to the Department to
investigate reducing the speed on Route 654 in the vicinity of the Colonnades/Old Salem
Apartments entrances. The Department has completed its investigation and this is my report.
The Department monitored speeds along Route 654 in this area, reviewed accidents and
undertook a traffic signal study at the two entrances involved. The results of these studies
do not warrant a traffic signal at either entrance nor a reduction of the current posting of
45 mph. The speed study observed over 100 vehicles. The 85th percentile speed of those
vehicles was 50 mph which exceeds the current posted speed limit by 5 mph. Under certain
conditions the Department has posted roads at the 50th percentile speed. This is the speed
which is exceeded by half the traffic monitored. The 50th percentile speed for this study
was between 45 and 46 mph. Based on the speed study alone, neither the Traffic Engineer nor
I can recommend a reduction of the speed limit.
The traffic signal study indicated that side street volumes entering Route 654 from the
Colonnades or Old Salem Apartments were relatively low. Only three hours out of the eight
required on one of the eleven warrants studied met the volumes needed for a traffic signal.
Included as a part of the signal study, accident data was obtained for the period between
January 1989 and July 31, 1991. The only reported accident during this period involved a
collision with a deer. Based on the traffic volumes using the entrances and the accident
data, we cannot recommend the installation of a traffic signal. Further, the lack of
reported accidents does not warrant reducing the speed limit.
I recognize that the Colonnades entrance has been in place for only a short period of
time. This is especially true when we recognize that accident data in our computer banks is
only up to date through July 31, 1991. I would suggest we wait a period of time until
additional accident data has been generated and obtain an update of that information. Until
that review, however, we believe the current posted speed limit should remain.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
Miss Lettie E. Neher
Route 654, Albemarle County
Page 2
February 13, 1992
I request that you pass this information on to the Board of Supervisors.
prepared to discuss this at a future board meeting if they so desire.
I will be
Yours truly,
):s- A Kz~~ W~~ V--
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DSR/smk
cc: R. W. Tucker, Jr.
V. W. Cilimberg
J. C. DuFresne
J. H. Shifflett
II) i',' ,
t i"
!
\
I
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Distributed to Soard: ;? - / 4 - (/.~
Agenda Item No. 9c~' tJ,-~{{i.4)
~//f. C ~,~ / (7~ /;? ~~
tJ I' )-rv' c)r r~ :_ 8
" 1,:,.")
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P, 0, BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902
~'.- ~- V_ {J',.-{S
D, S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
February 10, 1992
Route 240, Albemarle County
Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Miss Neher:
At the January Board
concerning the Department's
along the primary system. I
and the other board members.
of Supervisors' meeting Mr. Perkins requested information
criteria for determining locations for guardrail installation
am replying to that question. I request you advise Mr. Perkins
Basically, the Department allocates a certain dollar amount each year to new
and replacement guardrail along the primary system. Any funds not used to upgrade or replace
existing guardrail is available for installation of guardrail at new locations. Ye give
first priority for new locations to spots that have been brought to our attention, reviewed
by the Traffic Engineer's office and recommended by him for guardrail. If any additional
funds remain, we have attempted in this area to install guardrail along our more heavily
traveled routes at locations which are eligible for guardrail.
Yhile Mr. Perkins indicated that the section of Route 240 from the Lickinghole Creek
crossing westward up the hill had been pointed out as a problem area in the past, I could
find no record of a request for guardrail installation. My review of this location indicates
that guardrail can be installed without additional shoulder construction at all but a couple
of locations along this section. Yhile it is too late to include this location in this
year's guardrail schedule, I will make this area known to the Traffic Engineer and request
that it be included in a future schedule.
Yours truly,
,~ r
/:J A ~~;-3?- -\;~ ,\ V--
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DSR/smk
cc: R. H. Connock, Jr.
J. C. DuFresne:
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
e
e
e
~
"fo~t ~m1ttuuttl.1!sSotiatiOll
J. I. lox GS3
"t'o~t, ,; 22932
March 13, 1990
Mr. Daniel Rooseuelt
Resident Engineer
Uirginia Department of Transportation
Charlottesuille, UR. 22901
Dear Mr. Rooseuelt,
The Crozet Community Rssociation is concerned about the lack of
guard rails on Route 240 just west of the Lickinghole Creek bridge.
There haue been seueral accidents on that part of the road in the last
seueral months. This section of road is especially treacherous during
bad weather.
We hope that this problem um be corrected to protect liues and
property. Thank you uery much for helping us in our mission for
Crozet community!
Sincerely yours,
do Rnn Z. Perkins
Secretary of C.C.R.
",'
,~'t/~{;:.:;~~,,}~
l~' !, .,-' .. '. ~~~\
,y,: ' '~~~-'. \.i\
(i, , ~'" ,;
~r~t~;dc'
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P 0, BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
March 28, 1990
Route 240
Ms. Jo Ann Z. Perkins
Secretary
Crozet Community Association
P. O. Box 653
Crozet, VA 22932
Dear Ms. Perkins:
Reference is made to your letter dated March 13, 1990, requesting guardrail
along Route 240 west of the Lickinghole Creek bridge.
A similar request has been received from the State Police concerning this
location. I have had the location reviewed by our Traffic Engineer's Office.
While a number of accidents have occurred in this area the vast majority seem to be
due to excessive speed and/or drinking. Funds are not available at this time to
install guardrail over this long stretch of road. Ye will certainly consider such
installation in future years, however. The Traffic Engineer has recommended
upgrading the signing and road edge delineators to better advise traffic of the
hazards. This upgraded signing will be undertaken by the District Traffic
Engineer's Staff in the very near future.
Yours truly,
~. S~~--%'i:)JLl V
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DSR/smk
cc: J. C. DuFresne w/attachment
H. Y. Mills w/attachment
A. G. Tucker w/attachment
c. Y. Wright w/attachment
~
L:~UJ.;,.; '" ;;";'i(Ll..':..~.::~".,'!P~
Agenda item No. I/Z, c:po C;, ;::;;3
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development'
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
[.],'".<,~, .r:JC'12,', '~,D.lll1Ii\ ~
" I, II
r\\\,~:'~25,1~:,~~ It' .
J L~: ;..;~,.:,:\ \..,.:.:.) \,.~,~~: L~, tJ t L-: f,u~
BOl\hD OF SUF'ERVISOi-{S
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
PACC Technical Committee
PACC Policy Committee
Albemarle County Planning Commission
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
David B. Benish~hief of Community Development
TO:
DATE:
February 21, 1992
RE:
Sunset/Fontaine Avenue Connector Road
Reauest: Pursuant to a request to develop 87 acres for
office service uses, the University Real Estate Foundation
(UREF) is seeking a determination from the Board of
Supervisors as to their intention of construction for a new
connector between Sunset Avenue and Fontaine Avenue.
Background: The site is located in a City/County/University
joint planning area established by the Planning and
Coordination Council. The Three Party Agreement between the
City/County/University reqUires the development of
studies/plans for these joint planning areas. These are to
be adopted and implemented by all three parties. The
JPA/Fontaine Avenue Neighborhood Study was developed for
this area and was adopted by the City, County, and PACC.
One recommendation of this study is the development of a
north-south access in the western part of the study area (p.
50). The specific recommendation of the study is:
o with the termination of Sunset Avenue, an alternative
north-south access is needed in the western section of
the study area. We recommend two alternatives:
1. Connect Sunset to Fontaine via parcels B1, B2, C3,
C2. Constraints are rugged topography, several
stream crossings, and a railroad crossing.
~
2. Connect Sunset Avenue and Rt. 29 via Parcel D2 and
D1, linking to the existing intersection from
Sherwood Farms onto Rt. 29. The constraint is the
at-grade railroad crossing. Higher traffic over
time might necessitate a grade separated crossing.
During the County's review (approved January 17, 1990) of
the Redfields PRD, it was determined that alternative #2
above was not a realistic alternative due to the existing
topography and the resultant cost of construction due to the
topography, railroad crossing, and access potential onto Rt.
29.
In the review and approval of the County's Priority List for
Secondary Road Improvements, a study of the Sunset
Avenue/Fontaine Avenue connector road was included as
priority 43 out of a total of 65 projects. In conjunction
with the site analysis of the proposed project, the project
consultants have provided a general analysis of the
feasibility of this road (Attachment 3).
Consultant Analvsis Findinqs: The consultant analysis
indicates that the proposed road would be prohibitively
expensive to construct and pose severe environmental impacts
to several creeks and drainage ways. Significant grading
activities would have to be undertaken on steep-sloped areas
both on and off-site of the proposed development.
Construction cost for the railroad crossing alone would be
prohibitive (estimated at $2,000,000). Total of the road is
estimated to exceed $3,600,000.
Of particular concern for UREF is whether the proposed
roadway would significantly impact the developability of the
property and potential conflict with the type of development
proposed (in terms of noise, security, traffic, etc).
staff Comments:
The primary purpose of this road is to provide a more direct
connection from the southwestern portion of the County's
urban area to downtown, OVA and western destinations. with
Sunset Avenue now closed to through traffic, Stagecoach
Road/Fifth Street Extended and Old Lynchburg Road become the
primary routes to these destinations. The consultant
analysis estimated over 10,000 vehicle trips per day on the
proposed connector. Therefore, it appears that this road
would improve the overall road network.
However, based on the consultant's analysis and staff's
evaluation of the alignment in the field, staff does not
recommend that a connector be constructed in this area.
This recommendation is based on the following:
1. The environmental impacts from crossings of streams and
wetlands areas and grading on steeper slopes in the
area.
~
2. The impact on the developability of the UREF property
and the remaining area in the corridor.
3. The prohibitive cost to the County for the construction
of such a road.
4. The proposed roadway would probably not be useful in
opening up undeveloped areas to development due to
the significant impact on these areas.
As an alternative to the development of a new north-south
connector road, it is recommended that emphasis be given to
upgrading Sunset Avenue and Lynchburg Road to improve access
back to Fifth street Extended and I-64 (via Fifth Street
interchange) to reach downtown and western destinations.
Fifth Street Extended/Stagecoach Road in the county from
I-64 to south of Rt. 780 will be upgraded to a four lane
divided road. Construction is anticipated to take place in
1992/93. A significant investment has been made on this
improvement so that it is adequately designed to serve as
the primary access to this area. While this may not be the
best possible solution it appears to be the most realistic
and feasible, given the cost and environmental impacts of
the proposed connector road.
Attached Information:
A. JPA/Fontaine Avenue Study Area Map showing UREF site
and connector road alignment.
B. Map of study area showing development "parcels"
refereed to in study.
C. McKee-Carson, Consultant Study of connector road
alignment.
D. Three Party Agreement.
DBB/jcw
" f ~ 1\
~ \ .... 1 I, I
~ ~. \','
) ,\ ...,~ ...,.1....,../ - / BEL LA I R '"
Y-" / ESTATES /7~
),..- ) ,.' -.' li;
. I ( .-
f IIROI.'OOO '-, ,-J~'-_ -." ~ /"J
) . ---.-." ~
) ;/.
.. -'I' ...
~. _.. ....... cc
1"~' .~~ ....
~~~ . \ '0" !He OAH
) (~ '\..-,~
) \ \~ lJ\ ,
~ \ r
) ........ .._l....
) ~\~
\
0'\
N
ATTACHMENT A \',:,<:'~, '.' :/'.,~::
.;
",/:' ..'
( .. . ~~~::. " ;'-
i..' <.~<Sl..,~; ~~,/~ .f "
~--. ~""':.~l" ~~
....~ ,': ~,~~,... '. " .....
.., '.. 00 00 ~~.
~ ' \ .,., ". ,,.:; ,po: ;"
. .'.. "~', '.. ,.,;.., . .~~\"!
. .., ,t of.
. 1I:t a._. ~ 0.' . .' ~ . ..' . . ~
~ ~~ ~,~' ~...:. ~;.
~, ,...;r-' ..,' ';. ,'" ..,., '\'
~ I j'" '.~ w
,..~ .:.u~. .... "
. : ,,' ' ",\.;'~lII.aE:
, .... ,'. ." .,,' ~ f'.,..."", .. "
, ,.' ('(....... " "
. tOG' .,
~'" :~ '~ .: ' A ~:;.
. . . <"'. ..,,""'" ,',
(~ .~ f....;.,.~r;,._;~l
~ <;:0'" ~~.. , 'W~"
\.~~~ ,," ,. "'M ' , \
,~~, i!' ,."
" ,
UVA.
t':-'
..,;.:' ,~
.. 't:
'. ~
. ';. :~~". ..~.
"
.;'
"
..
, :.',
I ~
!
. :'~ . f' . 0,
.0' .
, '
~..
~.o ..
: . ; . f
. ....
, .
I "':,.1.1
)
,
)
)
)
)
}
)
)
,
+i
1200
I
GJ
2400
I
\
Study Area Boundar~s
.JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE-FONTAINE AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY
Charlottesville. Virginia Department of Community Development Prepared by: Land Design/Research Inc.
Exhibit 1
\ II
1.-..., \, It. '
" .. \... -.....
! II · .,
"I ' \
1= ~
! ::''/ ,\
~/"7 \
.". i '''\ \
'-.. " . \
,~ <"': '-- ; ,.../ "
- ~ .... <,,,-,:'
(z... '
" .....,,..>~
~.//::r'
.~
.......
'-
IATTACHMENT 81
"',
'"
....,
""-
...
."'; ~
h
I'
r....t.
" '
"
"
'"
,
\
..
~
:t II
I,
l
'"
!:
-.
il
if
I'
.1
'j
I! ',"
.i ,/
. ;,.:.-:;//
,~.
<~
,-0'0
-....::..
:~,
".~4,
-, .~
"--
. ;'.
.., i'-
. .
;' t
j F
; :
II
..
i
~
i
~i
!i
:i
~ . ./
i/
.......
.
I
I
\
il
Ii
.
i
j
.
:
.i
= i;
H"
! ;!
I
!
.
i
\
.\ /'.,
\-"
\
\
\
...~.II'.~. ~.-,:~;,.-.:" ~.:..~..' ..~..-:
, _ . ., " ":.;. ;'r;,~'~~':. ':
....... ,. .
. _-::_, '. r'o r:. ~, ~
, ~..
. ! .. ' ...,:-::
.'. _'. ". ~ . y;: ~>":7:
.. . ..~ q
j.. -.,
.,~ ""~:? .
,"
1
/f
':4 :
;
J,-
-- i
! I
!-- I
:. I
l~ I
!
'.
~ i
~ !
1
11
~ !
z !
~
z
;; :
'"
i .
< i
~ i
_ j t\S
! ~ ! .,...
: i 1 ~
~ ~ .~ ~
. ! ;
_ .. .i ~
! z ~..z>
! :
:.f..h:
~=.t X
C~ u.J
'.
.
.
"
)
-'--..
~
>
,
.~h.
\ATTACHMENT c1
.'
McKEE/CARSON
RECEIVED
.IAN 1 0 1992
PLANNING DEPT.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
PLANNERS
10 January 1992
Mr. David Benish
Chief of Community Development
Department of Planning and Community Development
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, V A 22901
RE: University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation Fontaine Avenue Property; SR 782 Relocation
Dear David:
Pursuant to our meeting on December 18, 1991, I am writing to offer our comments pertaining to the
suggested improvements to SR 782 as they relate to the pending rezoning of the UV AREF Fontaine
A venue property. As you know, it is the position of both the Real Estate Foundation and
McKee/Carson that any road realignment of SR 782 through the site is inconsistent with the
intended use of the property and that construction of such a roadway is neither technically nor
economically feasible. It is our understanding that, upon receipt of this letter, you will initiate
the appropriate hearings with the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors to present our
case for release of the proffer from the previous zoning which stipulates improvements and
realignment of SR 782. This will enable us to pursue the orderly planning of the property free of
the constraints which this proffer imposes. As follows, we have addressed several of your
concerns relating to this issue.
For purposes of discussion, we have prepared a very schematic horizontal and vertical alignment
of a connector road extending from Fontaine Avenue to Sunset Avenue. The quantitative analysis
of the roadway presented below is based on this preliminary alignment which we feel best fits
the terrain and minimizes overall environmental impact.
Roadway Standard.
Assuming ultimate buildout of both the Fontaine property and those residential properties south
of the railroad, total traffic volumes have been estimated to exceed 10,000 VPD. Based on this
figure, the roadway would need to comply with VDOT standards-for a rural local road in rolling
terrain category. This translates to a 4-lane, divided road with 16' median, 90' right-of-way, 9%
maximum gradient and 478' minimum centerline radius.
Environm-ental Impacts.
UV AREF Property Only: Fontaine Avenue to Railroad
Maximum cut at centerline near Fontaine Avenue -25'
Maximum fill at centerline near railroad and bridge abutment -IS'
Width of grading limits with 2:1 slopes at top of hill near Fontaine Avenue -180'
Approximate width of grading limits with 2:1 slopes at RR bridge abutment -140'
Stream crossing (bridge) will be required at railroad
QUEEN CHARLOITE SQUARE
256 EAST HIGH STREET
CHARLOITESVIllE, VIRGINIA 22902
804-979-7522
FAX: 804-977-1194
, .'
I Page 21
Mr. David Benish
10 January 1991
Page 3
Traffic Impacts.
Parcel designations referenced from Jefferson Park Avenue/Fontaine Avenue Neighborhood Study
prepared for the P ACC Task Force. UREF traffic fibures from analysis by Wilbur Smith Associates.
For portion of road on UV AREF property only
. Forestry Department Property with an estimated
103,000 S.F. of net office and 37,000 S.F. of warehouse
. UV AREF Property with approximately 400,000 S.F.
of office and support commercial uses
1,882 VPD
3,880 VPD
5,762 VPD
Total Estimated Maximum traffic from UREF and Forestry
For portion of road south of the Railroad to Sunset Avenue
Parcels Dl and D2, 112 Acres, R-l zoning, 10 VPD/D.U.
Parcels Cl, C2 and C3, 87 Acres, R-15 zoning, 6.5 VPD/D.U.
1,120 VPD
8,483 VPD
Total Estimated Maximum traffic from this area, excluding
other development areas southwest of Sunset which may use road
(eg, Biscuit Run, Redfields).
9,603 VPD
Estimated Total Traffic including potential off-site traffic
from areas southwest of Sunset Avenue
>15,000 VPD
Total Traffic Potential at Intersection of SR 782 & Fontaine Ave.
> 20,000 VPD
Summary/Conc1 us ions.
Realignment and reconstruction of SR 782 as described herein would be prohibitively expensive
and pose potentially severe environmental degradation on several creeks and major drainage
ways. Increased traffic on Fontaine Avenue and adjacent on and off ramps, for the 250/29 Bypass
would be substantial with added use from residential development areas to the south of the
railroad. Impact of such a major road on the UV AREF property would be severe from a physical
standpoint and would also cause potential conflicts (security, noise, congestion, etc.) with the
types of R&D, medical support and other academic-related uses intended for the property. In
summary, we would strongly recommend that alternative transportation solutions be considered
and that the proffer for the UV AREF property be released as a condition of development or
rezoning. Dedication of an increased right-of-way to 50 feet from its existing 30-foot prescriptive
easement along the existing SR 782 alignment could be proffered in lieu of major realignment.
. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response to our request as soon
as possible. With best regards, I am
(/--S~elY yours,
L-- td~~
9117
RBMcK:kmd
xc David Westby
IPage 31
Mr. David Benish
10 January 1991
Page 2
Residential Property: South of Railroad to Sunset Avenue
Maximum cut at centerline near Nob Hill-27'
Maximum fill at centerline near bridge abutment -22'
Width of grading limits with 2:1 slopes at Nob Hill -185'
Approximate width of grading limits with 2:1 slop~ near Moore's Creek -160'
Stream crossing required at Moore's Creek
Note that all width of grading limits are based on 2:1 side slopes, the maximum allowable by
VDOT. 2:1 side slopes require the use of guard rails. For improved access to building sites along
such a road, for ease of maintenance and for aesthetic appeal, flatter side slope are generally
preferred. If this was the case, we could expect a substantial increase in the width of grading
limits (ie. the "swath"). For example, with 3:1 side slopes, the maximum width of grading
limits increases to 230' on the UV AREF property and to 270' south of the railroad.
Cut and Fill.
For portion of road on UV AREF property only:
Estimated cut 45,000 c.Y. Estimated fill 20,000 c.Y.
For portion of road south of the Railroad to Sunset Avenue
Estimated cut 32,000 c.Y. Estimated fill 27,000 c.Y.
Loss of Developable Land Area on UV AREF Property.
Area consumed by grading limits with 2:1 side slopes -7.7 acres (13.3% of total property area,
will increase with greater than 2:1 side slopes)
Area consumed by 90' R.O.W. -4.1 acres (7.1 % of total property area)
Construction Costs.
For portion of road on UV AREF property only:
1,830 1.F. Category VII Road @ $230/1.F.
500 1.F. Bridge (from American Engineers)
Raise power transmission line
Rock Excavation
Mobilization
Contingency
$ 420,900
2,000,000
100,000
180,000
160,000
286,100
Subtotal for UREF Property
$ 3,147,000
For portion of road south of the Railroad to Sunset Avenue
1,670 1.F. Category VII Road @ $200/1.F. $ 384,100
Creek Crossing at Moore's Creek, 1.5. 50,000
Mobilization 20,000
Contingency 45,400
Estimated Total Cost
$ 499,500
$ 3,646,500
Subtotal for portion of road south of railroad
.r
I ATTACHMENT 0 I
.~
.~
.'
.
.
.~
.
a)
THREE PARTY AGREEMENT
The CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE; the COUNTY OB' ALBEMARLE,; and
THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA.. -hereby
agree as follows:
.
.a)
.'
'.'
. .'
.
.
.
.
.
.
.'
~ .. .~
.'
.
'.:
.
.
,.
-.
.
.
.
.
-.
The University Will:
1. Voluntarily comply with the land use plans and
regulations (as exemplified by those listed in Exhibit 1) of
ei ther the City or the County regarding the use of real estate
held in Area C on the attached map.
Area C* includes all land not included in Areas A and B (see
attached map).
2. Vol untar ily submit its construction' and/or development
plans for review by the City or County to determine their
compliance with land use plans and regulations on any real estate
held in Area B on the attached map; and make reasonable efforts
to comply with any recommendations received.
Area B* includes land which lies at the boundaries of or
between the University and either the City or the County and on
which the activities of any or all three of the parties might
have an effect. Area B will be designated a nstudy area.n The
City, County and University will work with each other to try to
develop a master plan for the study area perhaps by beginning
with its most critical parts. The intent is that the reeultL9f
-~ -.-.- --~---------
the cooperative study will be made a part of the Comprehensive
...--.. - ---'---~.
Plan of each bo_dy.,
. --........--~.;:
- 3. Voluntarily submit its construction and/or development
plans for review by the City or County on any real estate held in
....
Ipage 2\
). .
) .
)
)
)
)
.
.
)
)
)
.
)
)
)
J
)
)
)
>>
.t
>>
J
)
>>
)
>>
>>
J
.
J
Area A on the attached map; and make reasonable efforts to comply
with. any recommendations received. Area A* includes land either
on the Grounds of the University or at its borders. Since some
portions of Area A are of critical importance to the Ci ty and
County, the University also agrees that it will involve the City
and County in the development or revision of its Master Plan for
land use, and also in the study of those areas of A which, by
mutual consent, will affect the land use plans of each other.
4. Anticipate the formation of a Real Estate Foundation
_reated for the acquisition and development of land which would
not be owned directly by the Rector and Visitors, but which would
serve University purposes. The Real Estate Foundation will abide
by all City and County, land use laws and regulations (as
exemplified by Exhibit 1) regarding any property it holds. The
Foundation also will pay all applicable real estate taxes.
5. Not accept transfer of land to be used for investment
purposes from the Real Estate Foundation to itself primarily for
the p~rpose of avoiding the application of the City's and
County's land use laws and regulations or taxation.
6. Accept a representative of the City and County as
non-voting members of its Master Plan Committee.
7. Involve City and County representatives in site
selection studies on any major new facilities which may be
planned.
*Any difference of opinion over the geographical extent of either
Area A, B, o~ C shall be governed by the attached map.
-2-.
,.
IPage 31
}
),
)
>>
>>
)
>>
>>
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
J
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
>>
t
)
The County and/or City Will:
I. Submit to the University and to each other for review
all proposed changes in land use plans or regulations in Area B
on the attached map and make reasonable efforts to comply with
any recommendations made by the other parties.
2. Submit to the University for review all proposed
changes in land use plans or regulations in Areas A and C on the
attached map and make reasonable efforts to comply with any
recommendations made by the University.
3. Attempt to define a desired community growth rate
within its laws, regulations, or plans and attempt to regulate
development according to this growt~ rate to the extent allowed
by law.
4. Include a representative of the University as a
non-voting member of their planning commissions.
-3-
".
~age 4]
)'
)
The City. County and the Universit~ Will:
1. Adopt the same length of land use planning period.
2. Develop and use common definitions and common land use
data bases having the same or similar data elements.
3. Adopt the same interval between major reconsiderations
of their land use plans and schedule those reconsiderations for
the same year, unless precluded from doing so by State
requirements.
4. Adopt a substantially similar topical outline for the
purpose of describing their land use plans.
5. Share drafts of their land use plans with each other
for review and comment in advance of any public hearings.
6. Indicate those portions of each other's plans with.
.
which it agrees and do nothing during the planning period to
change those portions of the plan without mutual consultation.
7. Not sponsor, seek, nor support legislation restricting
the powers of each other regarding any of the terms of the
understanding or regarding any other matters related ,to taxation,
land use planning, or land use regulation except by mutual
agreement.
8. Agree to non-binding arbitration of any disputes during
the term of this Agreement. Arbitrators shall be selected as
follows:
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
}
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
}
)
)
)
)
)
.
}
(a) In case of disagreement involving all three parties,
each party shall select one arbitrator.
(b) In case of disagreement between any two of the parties,
-4-
- ,~
).
t
l
)
)
)
)
)
.
)
}
);
)
)
)
J
J
J
)
>>
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
~age ~
each party shall select one arbitrator and these two arbitrators
shall select a third. If the first two selected are unable to
agree on a third, then they shall request the third selection be
made by the judge of the Circuit Court of the City of
Charlottesville.
9. Agree these understandings may be dissolved on one
year's written notice by any party to the other two parties.
10. Take no actions which circumvent the purposes of this
agreement.
BY RESOLUTION duly adopted by Council on the 21st day of
April
, 1986, the Mayor was authorized to execute this
Agreement on behalf of the City of Charlottesville.
BY RESOLUTION duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors on
the 14thday of May , 1986, the Chairman was authorized to
execute this Agreement on behalf of the County of Albemarle.
BY RESOLUTION duly adopted by the Board of Visitors on the
31st day of January, 1986, the President was authoriz'ed to
execute this Agreement on behalf of the Rector and Visitors of
the University of Virginia. .
CI~~RLOTTESVILLE
By
COUN~~F ALBE~~
rB~~J i.-~'
(
/)/1
,.' ...-f/
",..--' /"".-'--..
~
THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF
TH~UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
By h\",-~ &u~~
-5-
Sandy Reeves - Shenandoah National Park
of;
Tell Mr. Reeves that he is scheduled^appear at the March 4th Board
of Supervisors meeting. Mr. Tucker seems to think that Mr. Reeves
should arrive around 9:45 a.m. for an approximate 10:00 a.m.
appearance.
Ask Mr. Reeves what kinds of things is he wanting to present to the
Board....and is there anything that Mr. Tucker needs to prepare for
(give this info. to Bob B. and Rick H.).
8:50 a.m.
March 3, 1992
.~.
~~ 1\f~
\UY t ()J
\~frY ?O
\ ~o ~~I
(3) the Park's economic study. NlI(f~fltf~~ ~fG (4Ar:~'s 1\5
T1Iff 5f&J1J '
He also stated that he was sorry it took himsoJlong to get back to you,
but he had a death in his fami Iy and was unable to cal I unti I today. I
· C::.k Mil 1t<'t ~k ~)~cJ.f;".i
1 ~'f-cPr .
Mr. Reeves returned your cal I. He said that he is planning on
three items:
(I) Status of related I ands project. ~ rJ1T/ffV /9~
(2) Discussion of Mr. Ryper's access - (he plans on saying that "it is
in court and we wi II not discuss it unti I it is out of court," but
if Mr. St. John thinks it best not to saY2Dthing, he won't. He
plans on seeing Mr. St. John before the meeting starts to get his
Qp[nlon on this.
I .
Distributerl to Board: 7. ;: j' , '7 .,,-
Agenda Item No, 11, c;3o </.; 35--
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Date:
March 4, 1992
BOARD OF SUPERVISO~S
Aqenda Item #:
Title:
Charlottesville/Albemarle Children , Youth Commission
Update
Backaround: The Children and Youth Commission was formed in
December of 1990 to serve as a comprehensive planning, coordinating
and evaluating body for children and youth services for both
jurisdictions. The attached report is provided as an update on the
progress and accomplishments of the Commission during the past year
as well as an outline of some of the goals set by the Commission
for the next year.
Mr. John Dawson, the newly elected Chairman of the Commission, will
present a brief update on this information at the March 4th
meeting.
Staff ContactCs): Mr. Tucker, Mrs. White.
jdbm
92.029
.. ..",
r
'*
FIRST ANNUAL REPORT
DECEMBER,1991
CHARLOTTESVILLE/ALBEMARLE
CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION
~-- ,
CHARLOTTESVILLE/ALBEMARLE
CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION
DECEMBER, 1991
Cynthia Stratton, Chairman
John Dawson, Vice Chairman
Margaret Crawford
Charles Gleason
Kai Rady
Blanche Steppe
Elly Tucker
Ann Webb
Audrianne Welborn
Eve Haverson. Student
Andrew Dowd-Reilly, Student
Kendra Trent, Student
OFFICE OF THE CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION
Rory Carpenter, Director
Kate Gaston, Planner
.
FIRST ANNUAL REPORT
DECEMBER,1991
CHARLOTTESVILLE/ALBEMARLE
CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION
CACY
Objective#l: Establish the Charlottesville/Albemarle
Interagency Youth Services Council
To improve the coordination and efficiency of children and
youth services in the Charlottesville/Albemarle area, the
CACY Commission and staff will establish and staff the
Interagency Youth Services Council (7/1/91-6/30/92).
Accomplishments
o Developed the structure of the Interagency Youth Services
Council which is inclusive of all public and private
youth serving agencies/organizations in the
Charlottesville/Albemarle area (See Attachment #1);
o Planned and facilitated the Interagency Council kick-off
meeting for over 100 agency representatives (9/20/91);
o Developed 14 issue-specific Program Area Teams (PATS)
at the Interagency Council Kick-off meeting to include
Parent Education, Dropout Prevention, Health Care, Preg-
nancy Prevention, Mental Health, Child Abuse Prevention,
Education, Employment, Home Based Services, Substance
Abuse, Child Care, Residential Care, Recreation and
Case Management (CHAIN). The role of the PATS is to
develop priorities/needs, conduct. research, share
information and improve coordination in specific program
areas for the CACY Commission;
o Established the Interagency Council Steering Committee
which.is made up of a representative from each PAT and
the Director's of the five public youth serving agencies;
o Planned the agendas and staffed monthly meetings of the
Steering Committee which directs the activities of the
Council and acts as a conduit for the exchange of
information between CACY and the Interagency Council,
providing a system of coordination and communication
between children and youth serving agencies and between
these agencies and City/County government.
~
~
Future Directions
o Through the establishment of this formal interagency,
network agencies can exchange information and, through
interaction with the CACY Commission, participate in the
formulation of policies affecting children and youth;
o The Interagency Council will improve the coordination and
efficiency of children and youth services by providing an
overall system of communication, data collection and
service assessment that will avoid duplication and gaps
in the service delivery system;
o The development of a data base of local children and
youth services through the Interagency Council and CACY
will provide access to service information for clients
and agency staff;
o The PATS and the Steering Committee will identify service
needs and priorities to assist the CACY Commission with
planning for local children and youth services;
o The Council will plan and provide necessary training for
agency staff at low cost;
o The Council will develop a Grant Clearinghouse that
channels grants to the appropriate agencies and provides
grant writing assistance to stimulate financial input
from sources beyond CountY/City government.
Objective#2: conduct an Evaluation of Designated Agencies
Serving Children and Youth
To assess the effectiveness of local. children and youth
services,the CACY Commission will conduct an evaluation/
assessment of 10 agency programs that provide either child
care or at-risk youth services and are funded by the City
and/or the County (8/1/91-12/15/91).
These agencies or agency programs are: Community Attention,
Outreach Counseling Services, Teen Sight, Peer Hype, United
Way Child Care Scholarship Program, Madison House (Big
Sibling Program), MACAA (Project Discovery, Camp Horizon),
CVCDA (Child Care Directory), Family Services (Parent Ed.).
Accomplishments
o Developed a data-base for each program under evaluation
with the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission;
,
~
o Developed the agency interview questionnaire;
o Conducted on-site agency interviews by CACY Commissioners
in teams of two;
o Developed priorities for local children and youth
services using the Children and Youth Task Force Report
as a guide and determined whether or not the evaluated
agencies were addressing these priorities;
o Reviewed the results of the agency interviews in
Commission meetings and drafted the Agency Evaluation
Report with presentation and distribution to County and
City government prior to budget hearings.
Future Directions
o The 1991 Agency Evaluation Report is the first step in a
long term process of children and youth services
evaluation and assessment by the CACY Commission
in the Charlottesville/Albemarle community;
o The evaluation process will continue in 1992 with
recommendations for individual agencies and the system as
a whole.
ObJective#3: Provide the Charlottesville/Albemarle Community
With Education and Training Concerning Children/Youth Issues
To increase community and professional awareness of children
and youth issues through a series of public education
activities and trainings (7/1/91-6/30/92).
Accomplishments
o Co-sponsored Teen Videos with the Office of the Drug
Coordinator shown on Adelphia Cable TV promoting summer
activities for City/County teens, filmed and produced
by City/County teens (7/1/91-8/31/91);
o Sponsored a Youth Substance Abuse Prevention Conference
for City/County service providers with the Office of the
Drug Coordinator to improve and coordinate local
intervention efforts (10/24/91);
o Assisted Charlottesville High School with the organiza-
tion of a Teen Forum on Substance Abuse at the Omni for
CHS students with the possibility of replication in the
County (12/3/91);
~,
~
o O,ganized and sponso,ed the local Blue Ribbon Campaign
fo, Child Abuse P,evention with the distribution of 5,000
blue ,ibbons and the pa,ticipation of 25 local agencies,
o,ganizations and businesses (4/1/91-4/30/91);
Future Directions
o Inc,ease youth pa,ticipation in d,ug and alcohol f,ee
activities that will promote healthy development;
o Coordinate and enhance the substance abuse prevention
and t,eatment programs of local agencies serving youth
th,ough the Substance Abuse PAT of the Interagency
Council;
o P,ovide youth with a fo,um to discuss p,oblems such as
substance abuse and teen p,egnancy and how best to
p,event these p,oblems;
o Expand the Teen Forum concept to include participation
of County youth;
o Inc,ease awareness and p,omote p,evention of child abuse
th,ough the annual Blue Ribbon Campaign and the Child
Abuse Prevention PAT of the Inte,agency Council;
o Plan and develop evaluation and assessment training fo,
local agency staff to improve their ability to conduct
needs assessments and evaluate their services through
the Interagency Council;
o Develop expertise within the CACY Commission to provide
coordination and me,ger facilitation for local agencies;
o Explore mode; prog,ams th,oughou~ the country that deal
with teen pregnancy prevention, substance abuse p,even-
tion, etc., for replication in Charlottesville/Albemarle;
o Provide a community forum for parents and other citizens
to discuss the needs of children and youth and develop
solutions.
Objective#4: Increase Family and Professional Awareness of
Available Services for Children and Youth
To increase the knowledge and awareness of County and City
families and professionals concerning available services for
children and ,youth, CACY will publish two resource guides
and conduct a media campaign.
,
~
Accomplishments
o Updated the Charlottesville/Albemarle Guide to Youth
Services by calling over 150 agencies/organizations
(11/1/91-12/31/91);
o Began updating the Charlottesville/Albemarle Summer
Guide for Youth (12/1/91...).
Future Directions
o Improve the ability of local families to access
appropriate services for their children through the
printing and distribution of the Charlottesville/
Albemarle Guide to Youth Services (2/1/92-3/31/92);
o Improve the ability of local children and youth service
professionals to refer their clients to the appropriate
resources through the printing and distribution of the
Charlottesville/Albemarle Guide to Youth Services (3/92);
o Increase children and youth participation in educational
and recreational activities during the summer through the
printing and distribution of the Charlottesville/
Albemarle Summer Guide for Youth (3/1/92-5/31/92);
o Publicize the CACY Commission and available resources for
local children and youth and their families through the
media (3/1/92-6/30/92).
Objective#5: Develop the Child Care Coordinating Council
To provide advocacy for and information dissemination about
child care and 'child care issues in-the community(1/92-6/92)
Accomplishments
o Organized the agencies/organizations involved'in child
care through the Child Care PAT of the Interagency
Council to become the Coordinating Council;
o Began to set priorities/needs concerning local child
care.
Future Directions
o Identify problems and issues to be adressed and design an
Action Plan;
,
o
o Coordinate activities of local child care organizations;
o Seek grants for improved program development and
community involvement;
o Provide a coordinated community response to state and
federal child care initiatives.
Objective#6: Explore Available Social and Recreational
Resources for City/County Children and Youth and Identify
Options
To determine how best to meet the recreational and social
needs of City and County youth (1/92-6/92).
Accomplishments
o Organized the agencies/organizations that provide
recreational opportunities for local children and youth
through the Recreation PAT of the Interagency Council;
o CACY staff participated in a committee that assessed the
social and recreational needs of City youth and developed
alternative activities.
Future Directions
o Explore available recreational and social resources for
City/County youth and determine gaps through the
Recreation PAT of the Interagency Council;
o Develop an Action Plan for improved resources;
o Coordinate existing recreational ~ctivities for children
and youth;
o Enhance the healthy development of City/County children
and youth through recreational opportunities. .
o Explore the feasibility of a regional Teen Center or
scattered Teen Center sites.
,
7.
Future Directions
n Exp ore available recreational and sac a1 resources for
City/County you h ancJ determine gaps thl>ou'qh tne
Recreatlon PA of the Interagency Council;
o Develop an Action Plan for improved resources;
o Coordinate existing recreational activities for chlldren
and youth;
o Enhance the healthy development of City/County children
and youth through recreational opportunities;
o Explore the feasibility of a regional Teen Center or
scattered Teen Center sites.
Objective#7: Develop and Write a Six Year Comprehensive plan
to Meet the Needs of Charlottesville/Albemarle Children and
Youth
The C{;CY Commission will develop and h.iTL'CS a 'Six Year
Comprehensive plan to meet the needs of local children and
louth based on the Children and Youth T sk For e Report of
1989 (9/1/91-6/30/92).
Accomplishments
o Reviewed previous needs assessments and current youth and
family statistics in the Charlottesville/Albemarle area;
o Developed and administered the Youth Survey to 10% of the
City/County middle and high school population.
Future Directions
o Develop and administer the Citizen and Agency surveys to
update previous oata;
o H old a " Tow n [Vi e e tin 9 " to co 11 e c tin for mat i on and r e c 0 ITI'"
mendations from citizens concerning children/youth needs.
o Analyze the survey data as a basis for the Six Year Plan;
o Write the SlX Year Comprehensive Plan with presentations
to County and City government;
o Provide the community with a comprehensive plan to meet
the identified needs of local hildren and youth.
..
.
ATTACHMEiJT # 1
CHARLOTTESVILLE/ALBEMARLE INTERAGENCY YOUTH SERVICES COUNCIL
CACY COMMISSION
(Charlottesville/Albemarle Children and Youth Commission)
t
Steering Committee Chairman
t
INTERAGENCY COUNCIL
SteerinQ Committee
Directors of the five public youth serving agencies
and a representative of each PAT
t
Program Area Teams (PATs)
CHAIN
Home Based
Services
Substance
Abuse
Child
Care
Residential
Care
Recreation
Parent
Education
Dropout
Prevention
Health
Care
Pregnancy
Prevention
Mental
Health
Child Abuse
Prevention
Education Employment
INTERAGENCY COUNCIL STRUCTURE
Inclusive of all public and private youth serving agencies/organizations
Agency staff organize into Teams by program/issue area
Each Team appoints a ,representative to serve Qn the Steering Committee with
Directors of the public youth serving agencies
Steering Committee elects a Chair who represents the Council as a voting member
of the CACY Commission
Entire Council meets annually/semi-annually for planning, training/education,
information sharing, etc.
"
.
'uistribuh:d to uD3rd: ~,~~ < .c) ~.. (:/. ()~
{';h iy" (';<..c'
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY.
MEMO
To:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Exec~ive
J.W. Brent, Executive Director~'/~
February 27, 1992 ~yv
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
r::--~ r'.--:' ........~ j-""l
if i , 1'" i ('\.1 ,'" ': r1l a~.l
'I 'I ,~"..,,,..,.,,, ,...' ,." . n
"I j k ","... "'", I
j j i ,j
l~'f ", , \1 I,
,,:, FI',q 2719n ,'I
i i' \ ',":,. . '11'1
J i 'I .. ','" ";:'., "" 1'''''l'I''~./
, '.'... ". I . t' I '.)
""..: \"" j , "- '.
, .... . ..~-..! t
SU FEi1\,!1S0l{S
> ':
Woodbrook Sewer Lift Station
The Board of Supervisors has requested that the ACSA
Board of Directors report to them on the operation of the
Woodbrook sewer lift station. Mr. Robert Humphris, Chair-
man, and Mr. Donald Wagner, Director from Charlottesville
District, will attend the March 4 meeting to address this
matter and to give an audio-visual presentation.
Following the Board of Supervisors' request, I asked
the Virginia Department of Health to inspect this facility
and to report their findings. A copy of that report is
enclosed.
Please let me know if you need any additional informa-
tion prior to the meeting.
JWB
JWB/lbt
c.c: Robert Humphris
Donald Wagner
CC::.;;J~\~l"'1 ()F )\Lt~; .;P.j.'~~.E
['
f:
r
~
f
"
E>:ECUTi\lE C~i~'FIC~~
'\,4
.;'\ -
-
A~C~/Ij~D
FED 0 5 199.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA ACSA ~
C.M.G. BllTTERY. M.D.
COMMISSIONER
Department of Health
Office of Water Programs
February 4, 1992
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING FIELD OFFICE
129 SOUTH RANDOLPH STREET
LEXINGTON, VIRGINIA 24450-2328
PHONE: (703)463-7138
FAX (703)483-3892
SUBJECT: Albemarle County
Sewerage - Albemarle County
Service Authority (Woodbrook
Sewage Pump Station)
Mr. John W. Brent, Executive Director
Albemarle County Service Authority
P. O. Box 1009
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Brent:
This letter is in reference to our meeting of January 31, 1992 and subsequent
inspection of the Authority's Woodbrook sewage pump station.
The Woodbrook sewage pump station consists of a duplex pneumatic ejector capable
of delivering 50 gpm at 96 feet total dynamic head. The Department and the State
Water Control Board issued a Certificate to Operate (VA0025518-2) to the
Authority on March 14, 1979. An operation and maintenance manual was approved
on July 6, 1979. The pump station serves a number of private residences in
Woodbrook Subdivision. You have indicated that the pump station is currently
operating at its rated capacity and no additional connections are permitted.
You also indicated the Authority's desire to replace this pump station and, in
fact, noted that proposed development of an adjacent property may allow
replacement in the near future.
Our inspection found the pump station to be in good condition. The facility
appeared to be well maintained and was operating properly. The ejector cycled
several times while we were present. Authority maintenance personnel present
during our inspection indicated that the lift station is visited and checked
daily (the approved operation and maintenance manual provided for the station
to be visited three times per week). An accumulation of grease was observed in
the sanitary manhole adjacent to the pump station. You noted that grease is
occasionally discharged from this manhole during some required maintenance
procedures when air is released from the ejector pot. When this happens, the
grease is removed and the area around the manhole is limed to reduce odors, A
file review indicated two reported occurrences of overflows at the Woodbrook pump
station. These occurred on November 20, 1990 and on December 30, 1990. Both
incidents were the result of mechanical equipment failures. Response time to
each incident and subsequent correction of the problem was timely and
appropriate.
~ . ."
...
Mr. John W. Brent
2
February 4, 1992
SUBJECT: Albemarle County
Sewerage - Albemarle County
Service Authority (Woodbrook
Sewage Pump Station)
In summary, the Woodbrook sewage pump station was found to be in good condition
and appeared well maintained. The Authority's operational procedures were
satisfactory. No evidence of malfunction or disrepair was noted. The location
of the pump station in close proximity to private homes and the lack of access
certainly results in some aesthetic/nuisance problems. The grease accumulation
at the receiving manhole may result in objectionable odors. We would suggest
that the Authority attempt to locate the source of the grease to insure proper
operation and maj ntenance of on-site grease traps, etc. Further, the Department
concurs with and supports your desire to replace this pump station as soon as
possible.
Should you have any questions, of if I can be of further assistance, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
James W. Moore, III, P.E.
District Engineer
JWM/bt
cc Albemarle County Health Department - Attn: Dr. Susan McLeod
State Water Control Board - Valley Regional Office
VDH - Richmond Central
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY
MEMO
To:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Bob Tucker, County Executive / ,.~/
J.W. Brent, Executive Directq{~V
February 20, 1992 v
Woodbrook Sewer Lift Station
The ACSA Board of Directors is ready to report to the
Board of Supervisors on this facility. When do you want to
schedule this? Bob Humphris will make the presentation.
J.W. Brent
COUNTY OF I\LU
'i:'
;_Ii..
'j
1
1992
. ~~
p ~
i. ;1
, ,,~~
EXCCU TlVE. Cii:FICC; ,
Distributed to Soard: Z,? f' ? 2-
b.
Agenda Item No.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
o [J.::fC!_rc.Dll~~
n. \ . n=:, .2~7..~=~) f.
HJI b~U U C::\.
SUMMARY SO:,;,r::9.!'1f'-:':- m~1l":'\ficr'!')s
. ' , . . ,,\, "-' .,......., r t.:t'. -\'..::r,J"T\
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE
Date: March 4, 1992
Aaenda Item II:
(1'2. b10 4):37
Title: Reader Printer Lease Purchase - Clerk of Circuit Court
Issue: The Clerk of the Circuit Court has requested permission to
enter into a five-year lease purchase arrangement on four (4)
microfilm reader printers that are causing maintenance problems in
her office. Her justification, which is attached, indicates that
four machines can be purchased now without increasing the line item
costs in her budget. The interest rate, which is identif ied
through a competitive bidding process is anticipated at
approximately 7.5%.
Recommendation: Staff feels that all lease purchases should be
approved by the Board as the County's auditor considers these
expenses as short term debt.
Staff ContactCs): Messrs. Huff and Tucker.
RWT,Jr/dbm
92.023
Attachment
~_ou..~utt~ ot~i~.
~iJWF ~ ~'lIidt
DEPUTIES
RECORDATION & RECORDS
296-9758
PAMELA C. GIBSON
KAREN p, SHIFFLETT
ROXANNE MORRIS
SHELBY J. MARSHALL, CLERK
CIRCUIT COURT
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
COURT SQUARE
501 EAST JEFFERSON STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901
ee' I' "-'.,~ r-, ~jE,:;
, 1 (.i 1'1 1 . t' cio1JRt"~1D.fi.II:M I! ~fiA TE
~"" ,...._, ", - -, - -. ~~9~'
I . , . or -.." t' ......, .....
') r .:-. ',: , ,f I ,~ \
, r '..1..1 ,.''''','.....,.,e,."A" . _,I.JffA~.f1.~,.
1,1;" TERRI M~9
tJ ~. DEBRA c. SH'I~
. \':'"' ,",' ~.
drr.,,:.1b~, TAY!Rl
":\11, \, DAYNA T. L .yl
. Jj\"; (i'''~_. I !
j I, ..'.. .., ".' -'"('3""- 1\
~~{J 1\,,_: :;..~._:~., ';.~'~:; :",j '1.3 ~=, t 'I)
~~)/'''l i~\;~';_;i\ lf~.r::'c..' ll' l\'~:J',l:~-~.-<\:i,' ,,:.'rD" .r..).c,'
0""-"1 \; t'4-;.l '...,. _}<, .1'1 ...._,1,\.).;1':0" ,Jo'\"v
February 24, 1992
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Lady and Gentlemen:
I have in place, a five year lease program to replace
Microfilm Reader Printers in the Record Room of the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court. The purpose of which is to replace
machines which are nine and eleven years old. Enough age that
they are constantly needing ~ervice maintenance, creating down
ti.me for as many as four machines at one time, leaving only one
operable piece of equipment. In attempting to replace these
machines with a lease purchase option, I have determined this
could be done with current funding in the fiscal year budget with
funds already appropriated for service maintenance contracts, and
funds appropriated for supplies, which includes cost of paper for
the old machines. The cost of paper for a single copy on the
old machine is .17 per copy, with the new machines we can make
copies for as little as .02 per copy, since we would be using
regular copy paper rather than silver print, the decrease in the
cost of paper will save additional funds to help defray the costs
of this lease purchase program.
I have just been informed of the necessity of getting the
Board of Supervisors approval for the lease purchase of the new
machines after everthing was in place for the finalization of the
lease purchase.
It has been suggested that I might look at the purchase of
one machine during this fiscal year if it appeared funds were
available, and while it certainly is more expensive to lease than
to make an outright purchase, the problem we are experiencing
with old equipment would not be alleviated with one machine.
Consequently, the lease purchase with funds already approved in
the current fiscal year budget seems appropriate.
I respectfully request approval of the lease purchase
arrangement, so this project may be finalized. The further we
get into the current fiscal year the more funds I have to use,
which were earmarked for this project.
I have attached a brief summary of how the
for themselves for the first year of the lease,
cost per unit, and will be happy to furnish any
the Board may need.
machines will pay
as well as the
other information
Sincerely,
~
/
/
sjm:
,.4" I \,
5 YEAR LEASE PURCHASE
LEASE PAYMENT OF $1,009.00 PER MONTH FOR 60 MONTHS FOR A TOTAL
COST OF $60,540.00, OR $15,135.00 PER UNIT.
SPECIAL PURCHASE PRICE 12,734.00
2,401.00 FINANCE CHARGE UNDER LEASE
WE PURCHASED THIS SAME UNIT IN 1989 AT A COST OF APPROXIMATELY
$19,000.00. THE SPECIAL PRICE IS FOR THE LEASE PURCHASE OF FOUR
MACHINES.
SINCE THE CLERK'S OFFICE IS A SELF SUPPORTING OFFICE THE MACHINES
CAN PAY FOR THEMSELVES:
To make payback on new reader-printers:
Amount per print now charged to patrons
Print cost to Circuit Court
.25
.02
Profit per print
.23
Year 1
No maintenance cost, equipment has 12 month
warranty:
Lease payment for four (4) units
Divided by profit per print
1,009.00
: .23
Total copies needed to pay lease
4,387 prints
Dividing this figure (4,387) between the four machines, means
that each unit would have to produce only 1,097 copies per month
to pay for themselves.
WE ALSO HAVE THE OPTION OF INCREASING THE FEE CHARGED FOR THESE
COPIES, ALTHOUGH WE CURRENTLY ARE AVERAGING AROUND $3,000 MONTHLY
IN REVENUE FOR COPIES MADE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE.
Disfribufed to Board:
Agenda Item No. _
ZZ',s'<;2"
~~/' \ '7
-'--I J / U<i
-
~-......
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
~.~ r~:::t (:::) r::J 1"1 '.l n r::':J r;:::1
I' I 1- I 0~""_.._,o ,~~.."~" '. \ i ; I
ll..~ -,""
i1 II' ,! 1: i
/1 '_",'~ .J ", '\!,,\ t::, ~
~,;c r~-~ ~.",..\,l,~'/ 'If ~\
'll "'" ,.,
1,; - l I l ~ ~
ro.1. '; .l '
" \ ,h-'-'f:- ,"'"1 "''1''-'''' !:.!
-' ~ 1..::". ..,~.:1 "J U l...:.:.:l L.:J
SQARD Qf SUPERV.SO~S
Date:
March 4, 1992
Aqenda Item #:
C1Z.O?o.j, ('Y/
Title: Sheriff's Request for Vehicle Replacement
Issue: Sheriff Hawkins has made a request in the FY 93 budget to replace a 1989
Cavalier with approximately 38,000 miles on the odometer with a full size police
cruiser. The Cavalier, previously assigned to a Deputy who handled mainly office
responsibilities has now been assigned, due to a retirement, to a Deputy with
full field responsibilities. Through a reorganization, the Sheriff no longer has
his Chief Deputy in the office full time.
The Cavalier, while in good shape, is unsuitable for transporting violent
offenders and mental patients due to its small size and the inability to purchase
a "cage" to protect the driver from a backseat passenger. Sheriff Hawkins has
requested that the Board authorize him to purchase this vehicle on the present
state contract at a price of $12,181 rather than wait until state contract cars
become available again in January, 1993. The Sheriff has further offered to
place the Cavalier in general government's motor pool to replace a vehicle which
has in excess of 100,000 miles on the odometer.
Recommendation: Although no funds were budgeted in the current year's budget for
the replacement of this vehicle, staff estimates that Staff Services will have
sufficient unexpended funds in its current budget to order the vehicle if
approved by the Board. Cutoff for ordering vehicles under the current contract
is expected to be in early March.
If the Board would rather ask the Sheriff to hold off this purchase and make it
a budgeted item next fiscal year, staff will place it appropriately in the FY 93
budget.
Staff ContactCs): Messrs. Huff and Tucker.
RWT,Jrjdbm
92.019
.c
Distributed to Boar.J.-~z f ; <) '~
(J. 'lIJI!
Agenda Item No.
f~, t?;/~, /3~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COII~""r\l ',"\,'" f:!'''' 4
, \"1 >oj f \.n i'. L _).~ !.;\!\f-{ L t
1~1-1. ~: 1-':;) :-;:--' r; '\': n i' ...: - ,::
.".1,1.. i .-........'., .,'...' .",.. ,'.',' ..",
~)kf ',.,..,"" i; !
i', .., ~.,-,., 0"."" ',' '.' ~ I
'\'~~'\'~ ".... '''''-' ~ > ~ ""'... }:',
'1'111 \ ). , I I
( .' :' " ~;"\...""...;....'.. ,~ ~'I. I
I ., .' ~ ... " ,"
~lJ (L" <'.";";" .,.~,_ ' +;" ~~~"'i :,..1
ft':)f-;:> ,-""; ,',,_ __ ....l 1,_ _ ~' ._ t.
0> "'. " ,L. 'l')~ -'. t t ,.., ~ ' . '.)$'
. .' '..... ..... :- -\" ".. ~I'\ '
Date:
March 4, 1992
Agenda Item #:
C77- 67,f.(~
Title: Lickinghole Creek Regional Stormwater Management Facility
Issue: Update and request to proceed with acquisition and
construction.
Backaround: As a followup to the status report presented at your
January 15, 1992 meeting and the request of Mr. Perkins, the
attached report on the Lickinghole Creek facility is provided for
your discussion.
Recommendation: Staff requests a final decision on whether to
proceed with acquisition and construction of the facility.
Staff ContactCs): Messrs. Tucker and Robertson.
/dbm
92.028
t
ALBEMARLE. CHARLOTTESVILLE
OFFICE OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
401 MCiNTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
SPECIAL REPORT ON THE
LICKINGHOLE CREEK REGIONAL
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY
February 27, 1992
PROJECT PURPOSE:
The Lickinghole Creek Regional Stormwater Management
Facility will provide water quality improvement in the South
Fork Rivanna Reservoir through regional runoff control for the
Crozet growth area (see attached map). The regional approach
is in lieu of numerous on-site facilities which would be
required for individual properties under the Runoff Control
Ordinance. Crozet represents an anomaly in the overall
Watershed Management Plan in that housing, commercial and
industrial development are at sufficient densities to generate
significant runoff from impervious surfaces (rooftops, roads,
sidewalks and other pavement). A regional facility addresses
this problem by controlling nonpoint source pollution from both
existing development and proposed development within the
watershed of the facility.
Stormwater management is necessary for the Crozet growth
area to remove pollutants (such as nutrients and sediment) that
create water quality problems in the South Fork Rivanna
Reservoir downstream. Research has demonstrated that
uncontrolled stormwater runoff will reduce reservoir volume
(water quantity) and continue to exacerbate eutrophication
problems (water quality).
PROJECT BACKGROUND:
The South Fork Rivanna Reservoir has been studied
extensively since 1974, using local, state and federal funds.
Reports funded through the Clean Lakes Program and the 208
Program have emphasized the need for a variety of watershed
management practices including land-based erosion and
stormwater controls for development, best management practices
for agriculture and forestry, and land use management for a
variety of other activities which impact water quality. The
208 Study by F.X. Browne Associates, Inc. (1982) recommended
regional stormwater management controls, including the proposed
Lickinghole Creek facility. .
" ..
Lickinghole Creek Report, 2/27/92
page 2
F.X. Browne analyzed four subregional basins in the
Lickinghole Creek watershed vs. one regional facility. That
analysis indicated that a single regional facility was the most
cost effective approach.
PROJECT FUNCTION:
The Lickinghole facility will act to remove pollutants by
detaining stormwater in an impoundment. This 27 acre lake will
slow incoming water velocities and thereby result in sediment
removal (through deposition) and nutrient removal (through
deposition and uptake by plants). The facility will not store
floodwater and is not designed for that purpose. While
floodwaters carry high pollutant loads, the largest percentage
of pollutants are transported as a result of more intense,
shorter duration storms. By detaining the "first flush" from
these storm events, the most significant pollutant loads are
removed.
PROJECT DESIGN:
The project is designed as a concrete overflow dam with an
impoundment of 27 acres. In order to mitigate for unavoidable
impacts to wetlands in the existing floodplain of Lickinghole
Creek, a wetland complex will be established at the headwaters
of the impoundment and along the northern shoreline/shallow
area. This established wetland will enhance pollutant removal
through nutrient uptake and will also serve as habitat for
aquatic species and waterfowl.
PROJECT COST/EXPENDITURES:
Current funds allocated for the Lickinghole Creek project
in the capital Improvements Program (CIP) for FY91-92 stand at
$1,905,381.19. This figure does not include $300,000.00 in
federal Clean Lakes funds allocated in 1985. These federal
funds must be spent bv September 30. 1992 or they will revert
to the federal treasury. Because the federal Clean Lakes funds
have been extended for such a long time period, it is important
to emphasize that they may be lost. This would reflect poorly
not only on the grant recipient (Rivanna Water & Sewer
Authority), but also on the state as a participant in the Clean
Lakes program. If there is any doubt about this project going
forward, it should be clearly communicated to the Virginia
Water Control Board and EPA in order that they might attempt to
direct funds to another lake project.
A recent construction estimate by the design engineer for
the project (Gloeckner and Osborne) indicates that projected
~ .
Lickinghole Creek Report, 2/27/92
page 3
construction costs are well within budget. The amount expended
to date is approximately $67,500.81. There has been no
drawdown on the federal funds since they are to be used only
for construction.
While the County is fully funding the construction of the
facility, there will be some reimbursement through pro-rata
share fees paid by new development. The pro-rata share
contributions are already being collected in lieu of on-site
controls which would be required under the Runoff Control
Ordinance. The total of collections to date is $9,554.11
At full build-out, the pro-rata share reimbursement is
estimated to be $765,926.10 of the total $2,272,882.00 project
cost.
NECESSARY BOARD ACTIONS:
In order for this project to proceed, the Board is
requested to reaffirm their commitment to construct the
Lickinghole Creek Regional Stormwater Management Facility. The
Board must authorize acquisition of necessary properties for
the facility. Federal funds for this project (totalling
$300,000.00) are in serious jeopardy without definitive action
by the Board. The project is on an extremely tight schedule
which will not allow further delays (see attached work
program). The County needs to decide if it will build this
project even without federal funds.
wr92-27
.
F. X. BROWNE ASSOCIATESJ INC.
...
.. f -
~
(
/
/
n
"
~
'~\-..-
..l.
~~ -..
"..' 7-.'.
;,;\ "O./I"&-If
\+? ..
..; . <,'
t_ ~/ 11I1
Figure 3. Proposed Regional Detention Basin
f..
~
~
-
U
<
~
E-c
Z
~
::E
~
C-'
<
~
~~
I-; ~
C-'E-c
"d"<
~~
~~
~~
~~
-<
Uz
<0
~-
~C-'
~
~
~
~
U
~
~
o
=c
C-'
z
g
U
-
~
E
~
I-<
OIl
o
I-<
~
~
I-<
o
~
C"l
0\
0\
--<
...
0 *
.g *
.... *
0 *
0
... *
0
.0 *
a *
0 *
Q. *
0
en
....
Vl *
;:l *
Oll *
;:l *
-<
>. *
*
"3 *
...... *
0 *
~ *
;:l *
...... *
>.
C':l *
~
*
*
*
,-
... *
0... *
-<
* *
..s:::
0 *
... *
C':l *
~
* ;(-
G> * *
* *
C':l *
;:l
...
.0 -x-
0
(.L.
>. *
...
C':l
;:l
~
C':l
......
.;.; ~ ~
~ 0 0 .0 .2 ~ Oll 0
0 ~ 0 ..... C':l ~ C':l Vl
a ~ ~ 'r;; -;:: Vl ... 0
Vl ~ 0:: ..... ~
0 e- C':l ;:l .~ 'S C':l "0 ~ _2 ...
~ ;:l 0 0 CE 0 '0..
0 Vl U 0- ~ :r: 0 0
Vl C':l 0 Vl .2 "0 -~ U ~
S u ...... -- ~ -< "0 U CE 0 0 ;:l u.1
-< :.a ~ ..... Oll ..... 0 > "0 ...
~.~ C':l ...
C':l en ~ 0:: C':l 0 '1) ... ..... i::
Oll a a ... "0 .~ "@ 0 C':l Vl
..... ~ > ~
0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ..... ~ ~ '0' 0 ~ C':l
... ... 0 C':l ~ ~ 0 "0 0 0 ...
... -< ~ 0:: .....1 > Li: C':l -< ... 0:: -< U 0
A.. U A.. A..
I I I I I I I I I I I
-
~
~
~
~
U
<
~
E-4
Z
t:t:l
::E
t:t:l
~
<
~
ol-l::E
~ ~
..... t:t:l
~E-4
"l:t<
~~
~~
~rJ'J
~~
Uz
~g
t:t:l~
~
~
~
U
t:t:l
~
o
::r::
~
z
g
U
~
~
e
(Ij
I-<
/)J)
o
I-<
0..
...!:<::
I-<
o
~
C"l
0\
0\
......
....
~ *
.0 *
0 *
.....
() *
0
.... *
~
.0 *
a *
.2 *
0.. *
~
C/)
.....
'" *
;:l *
OJ) *
;:l *
-<
>. *
*
"5 *
-. *
~ *
t:: *
;:l *
-. *
>.
~ *
::::8
*
*
*
.;::: *
0.. *
<:
* .x-
..c
() *
.... *
~ *
::::8
* *
>. * *
.... * *
~ *
;:l
....
.0 *
~
r..I...
C *
~
;:l
t::
~
-.
d -:t t:: .....
0 :B OJ)
~ 0 t:: .5 ()
~ -:t () ~ ~ '"
a '" t:: t:: t:: '" 0:: .... '" .... t:: ~
~ 0.. ~ ;:l .2 '5 ~ "0 d .2 ....
~ .... ;:l 0 ~ m 0 '5.
0 '" u 'cil 0' '" t:: :;r:, "0 ~ U ..... ><
'" () .2 .~ ()
a u ...... --- t:: <: "0 u m ~ (\) ;:l ~
>..~ <: :.a t:: 'cil OJ) .... u > "0 ....
~ ~ c.:: '15 .... ..... d
OJ) a a C/) .... "0 .~ c; .rl ~ ~ ~ '"
0 ~ 0 t:: ~ .<;:: ::;E t:: > '0' () ~ t:: ~
.... .... ~ () "0 ~ 0 ....
.... -< ~ c.:: 0 .....l ~ ::;E > Li: ~ <: .... c.:: -< u 0
P-. U P-. P-.
I I I I I I I I I I I
i);stributed to Soard: 'c:~'( f i '1 ~
Agenda Item No. _ Cj 1/ 0 1z:~:..?t()
~
t
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COU!~,!Y.?r- P\U3FMAr~lE
O rr-' r;:-,) r.=Y ;-n '-,""---
I ' ,.-........"......,."..., "', · ~"; ,..... " f"',
Il' ".. ",I. "j,\., !. ~p
Ii\.l.,' ,~'~:~ S !:, ,fC~.':'') ,'.L ,I ;
I!I}.. '" .'.. "fl
./ U tl~:~. " ",-,;",-,. /! i /
.-.... . .. ',; lJ i '., ';
80," ,';>1"\ '--'" , .' '.....:..
",".... \,...t' l..: 1i.)CC"""-'r)!"}
"'. ,-'. L...1\ \i 1.:::;,.,J",S
Date: March 4, 1992
Aqenda Item II:
C-!/i /)1 zo i I<lJ
Title: Road Name policy
Issue: Whether to change the Road Naming Policy.
Backqround: The attached staff report responds to your request for
information on the policy for naming and changing road names
adopted by the Board last September.
Discussion: The implementation of the E911 system is an extremely
complex process of which the road naming is only one critical
element. The necessity to establish a baseline for road names was
identified and a change procedure implemented but due to the
complexity of E911 implementation, a cut-off had to be established
to allow the subsequent seauential milestones to be met. Staff
recognized the desire to respond to requested changes and
accommodated this in the policy. To allow changes on an as-
occurring basis significantly increases the risk of errors in
implementation. Such a change would avoid the cost of sign
replacement but being ale to make all the other necessary changes
that need to occur to support the new road name is error prone. It
is analogous to shooting at a constantly moving target. While not
recommending a change in policy, in order to minimize the cost
changes to road names, reusable road name signs will be used
throughout the County.
Recommendation: Retain the current policy with staff continuing to
minimize impacts where feasible.
Staff Contact(s): Bob Brandenburger, Wayne Cilimberg.
/dbm
92.024
Attachment
" 1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Bob Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
-&I .
Tex Weaver, Informatlon Resource Planner
February 26, 1992
Road Name Change Procedures
Prior to the adoption of over 700 road names in Albemarle
County on September 11, 1991 for the implementation of E911,
the Road Naming Committee, appointed by the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors, and County staff made the public aware
of the road naming process. From May through August, the
local media (TV, radio and newspaper) publicized the road
naming process. In July, a public meeting was advertised
and held by the Road Naming Committee to solicit road name
requests from County residents. As a result of this
process, over 200 documented letters were received from
residents for road name requests.
On September 11, 1991, the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors adopted both the Road Naming Committee's
recommended road names and the following procedure for
requests to change adopted road names as outlined in the
memo dated September 4, 1991 from the County Executive to
the Board:
Chanqes to approved road names - Requests to change Board
approved road names must be submitted to the Albemarle
County Department of Planning and Community Development
and must be accompanied by a petition signed by a
majority (greater than 50 percent) of landowners along
such road. Petitions will be reviewed by staff and, if
acceptable, [staff] will administratively approve the
change. These changes cannot be implemented until the
County has assumed operational control and maintenance of
the building locator system scheduled for the summer of
1992.
After the initial actions noted above and in an effort to
allow County residents the opportunity to make road name
changes prior to the implementation of the building locator
system, staff recommended a change in procedure. This
procedure established a deadline of November 27, 1991 for
submittal of road name change requests which was agreed upon
by County staff and the locator system consultant (GTEGIS,
Inc.) as being within the scope of the locator system
contract. A public notice was placed in the Daily Progress
and Observer newspapers which ran for two (2) consecutive
weeks to notify residents of this opportunity (see
Attachment A). Petitions received on or before November 27,
1991 which met the aforementioned criteria have been updated
in the building locator system by GTEGIS. The road name
changes by petition are summarized in Attachment B.
Consistent with the aforementioned policies, residents
inquiring as to road name changes have been notified that
petitions submitted after November 27, 1991 would not be
reviewed until the County assumed operational control of the
building locator system due to the contract scheduling
requirements for implementing E911. The County's control
should begin in July of 1992. In June of 1992, all County
residents with rural style addresses will be notified of
their new road name (as it existed on November 28, 1991) and
address. Once this notification has taken place, this will
become the official road name and mailing address.
Therefore, inquiring residents have been notified that the
cost of implementing future road name changes (signage,
notifications, etc.) would be bourne by the requesting
residents.
While staff understands that the Board's road name changes
recognizing Presidents Jefferson and Monroe were exceptions
to the adopted procedures for road name changes, staff
reaffirms its recommendation that no future exceptions to
the adopted procedures be made. The intent of the remainder
of this memo is to address specific rationale to support the
staff recommendation.
1. Road Siqn Installation - The installation of road
signs need to be initiated as soon as possible.
Residents will be asked to begin using their newly
assigned address upon official notification by the
U.S. Postal Service scheduled to take place in June
of 1992. Having road signs installed as close to the
notification date as possible will reduce the
confusion and response time for emergency service
providers who are not yet familiar with the new road
names. This will potentially reduce/eliminate loss
of life, serious injury, and/or loss of property.
.. ,.
2. Road Name Chanqes - The review of road name change
requests should not be made until the County has
assumed operational control of the building locator
system. The E911 project consultant, GTEGIS, Inc.,
based on previous experience, has advised the County
that "no changes to the system should be considered
until the database is installed and fully operational
to avoid confusion and error during the address
notification process between residents, mail
carriers, County staff, and emergency service
providers."
The address notification process is a very important element
in the implementation of the building locator system. The
information contained on the address notification card (see
Attachment C) and the information requested of the card's
recipient is crucial to the overall success of the E911
project. It is necessary that all notification cards are
delivered at approximately the same time to ensure that the
building locator system database is accurate and contains
the most "up-to-date" information possible at the time of
installation at the County's site.
By allowing road name changes contrary to current policy
(prior to the notification process or the County receiving
control and maintenance of the building locator system),
some or all of the following ramifications could result:
The notification of residents of their addresses along
roads with changed road names would not coincide with the
address notification for the remainder of the County.
This would create confusion for residents, mail carriers,
County staff, and emergency service providers as well as
have a detrimental effect on the accuracy of the system's
database as outlined above; or
Delay in the entire notification schedule if complete one
time notification was desired. It should be noted that
this would not be within the scope of the contract with
GTEGIS.
The delay in notifying residents with road name changes
of their new address could potentially delay the
implementation of E911 now scheduled for January of 1993.
There would be a potentially significant delay in
ordering some road signs which could seriously jeopardize
the efficiency of emergency response as outlined above; or
All road sign ordering could be delayed, thus delaying
implementation of the E911 system.
;
~
Additional short term staff resources would be necessary
to verify petitions and coordinate changes to the
database in order to meet a reasonable implementation
schedule.
Potential confusion associated with notifying the public
of changes to the road name change policy. It should be
noted that staff has been relying on this policy in
communication with the public for some four (4) months.
Additional cost to the County to notify residents with
road name changes of their new addresses. It should be
remembered that this is not part of the contract with
GTEGIS, Inc.
In summary, staff feels that the Road Naming Committee did
everything that could be done to raise public awareness
regarding the road naming process as outlined previously.
In addition, public awareness was increased by providing
residents the one-time opportunity to make changes to their
road names after they were approved. To provide Albemarle
County residents with the best E911 product possible within
necessary time constraints, staff again emphasizes the
importance to maintain consistency with respect to the road
name change policy now in effect.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
cc: V. Wayne Cilimberg
Wayne S. Campagna
.
IATTACHMENT AI'
. Of AI.ll;;.
;,.,-'" li/- ~-'L(.
~' ,~i1f11' ~
o t ~~ -
c.; ,r, .:-
I .~.. ~ ......
~,r ":~ 'r
'(.=\ \ ,,--..,~'~I ,.t.
vll?GII'\;-"
The Albemarle County Board of SupelVisors recently approved road names for approximately
700 public and private roads. These names will be utilized in the' operation of the Enhanced 911
Emergency Telephone Locator System scheduled for implementation in., December, 1992.
Address assignment for the approved road names is expected to be completed by June. 1992. A
list of road names is available at the Department of Planning and Community Development, 401
Mcintire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia. If a change in a road name is desired before the
implementation of Enchanced 911. the request must adhere to the County's approved road name
change procedure and be submitted by November 27.1991. Costs of implementing changes,
road signage, etc., requested after November 27, 1991 mustbe borne by the affected residents.
For further information, contact the Department of Planning and Community Development at
296-5823.
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
PUBLIC NOTICE
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
.
IATTACHMENT BI
IPage 11
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Bob Brandenburger, Assistant County Executive
1hI' .
Tex Weaver, Informatlon Resource Planner
January 8, 1992
Summary of Road Name Changes by Petition
The attachment summarizes road name changes based on
petitions received in the Department of Planning and
Community Development for requests to change approved road
names adopted by the Board of Supervisors on September II,
1991. These petitions were submitted on or before the
specified deadline of November 27, 1991. Included on the
attachment is the adopted road name, the proposed road name
change, and the reason for the approval or denial of the
request.
Letters will be written to the individuals that submitted
petitions to notify them of the status of their requests.
If a road name change was not approved, individuals will be
notified as to our findings. Under the previously agreed
upon procedures outlined in my memo of October 23, 1991,
petitions may be re-submitted. However, the new submittals
will not be reviewed until the County has assumed
operational control of the building locator system scheduled
for the summer of 1992. Therefore, if a petition is
re-submitted and approved by our dep~rtment, the road name
change cannot be implemented until the County has assumed
operational control of the building locator system. In
addition, such petitioners will be notified that the cost of
implementing road name changes, signage, etc. must be bourne
by the affected residents.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please .
do not hesitate to contact me.
cc: v. Wayn~ Cilimberg
II
ADOPTED ROAD NAME
Lynchburg Road
staunton-James River
Turnpike
Cut Over Hill Road
Taylors Gap Road
stony Point Pass
Lonesome Mountain Road
Broad Axe Road
Turkey Sag Road
PROPOSED ROAD NAME
Monacan Trail Road
Plank Road
Scarlet Oak Lane
Mooreland Road
Broadhead Gap Road
Liberty School Road
Payne Mountain Road
st. Johns Road
{ATTACHMENT 8/
I Page 2/
FINDINGS
Approved: met
requirements
Approved: met
requirements
Approved: met
requirements
Denied: did
not meet
required
number of
signatures
Denied: did
not meet
required
number of
signatures
Denied: did
not meet
required
number of
signatures
Denied: did
not meet
required
number of
signatures
Denied: **
** Would create a new road name on the middle portion of
Turkeysag Road, leaving Turkeysag Road at each end, thus
creating a duplicate road name.
.
IATTACHMENT cl
Sample Address Notification Card
Your New Address Is:
Postage Paid
Permit No,
'23 America Drive
Charlottesville, Va 22901
Your Old Property Address Was:
P.O. Box 34A
Charlottesville, Va. 22901
Your address has been changed to improve 9-1-1
emergency service dispatch in your community.
Please begin using this new address immediately and
post the address clearly on your house, mail box, or
at your driveway entrance.
Please begin using your new address immediately and
please post the new address clearly on your house, mall
box, or driveway entrance.
Addresses within your community have been
standardized to improve 9-1-1 emergency services.
The 9-1-1 system will begin operations later this year.
Having a standardized address will shorten response
times for emergency services, which may mean the
saving of your life and property.
, The County regrets any inconvenience this may cause
you, but it is felt that the benefits of the standardized
addressing will be of use to all County citizens, If there
are any questions regarding your old or new address,
please contact the County Address Information Office,
at XXX-XXXX, 8 am to 5 pm, Monday through Friday,
Serial Number #######
~----------------------------_.
Postage Paid
Permit No.
NEW ADDRESS
123 America Drive
Charlottesville, Va 22901
County Address Information Office
County Courthouse
County Seat, Va, 99999
FRONT
Detach and mail send bottom portion
VERY IMPORTANT
PLEASE RETURN THIS CARD PROMPTLY
Please complete the questions on this card, then detach
and mail the postage-paid card to the County Address
Information Office. This information will be used to
verify information in the 9-1-1 system and by public
safety departments to provide more effective service.
Phone Number: U_-_
Medical Conditions: (Medic-Alert, Epileptic, Heart, etc.)
Other Information:
Serial Number #######
BACK
GTE Government Information SeNices, Inc,
GTE PROPRIETARY
.
.......
.......
0\
o
~
u
z
<:
=r:
z
~
o
z
<:
~
~
~
tI)
~
tI)
~
o
~
<:
u
o
~
d
Z
~
o
~
~
~
o::l
..l:l *
0
.... *
~ *
::;E *
0
2 *
*
*
.D *
<I)
~
0 *
~ *
*
*
.......
....
1 *
*
<I) *
g *
0
....
1 * *
* *
<I) * *
~ * *
z
....
.g * *
* *
..... * ,*
0 * *
0
....
<I)
.D * * *
s * * *
<I) * * *
..... * * *
Q.,
<I)
rJ)
.....
CIl * * *
~ * * *
= * * *
< * * *
>. * * * * *
"3 * * * * *
* * * * *
....... * * * * *
<I) * * *
~ * * *
* * *
....... * * *
>. * * *
~ * * *
::8 * * *
* * *
...... * *
'I:: * *
Q., * *
< * *
..s::l *
0
.... *
~ *
::;E *
.; ~ Oil
<I) .9 CIl
~ "Cl ~ 0 ..... Oil .~ .... <I) <I)
~ ~ .... ~ ,9 .s :~ <I) Oil () S
<I) ,9 tIS .9 <I) CIl ~ ~ ~
S ~ ] CIl '3 <I) ~ tIS S 2
~ < ..... ~ ~ E-< ..l:l Q., t;j
<U tIS '3 .D CIl 0 U ~ CIl
U3 () 0 ..s .... s .9 <I) ~ >.
!+:: -- !€ S E-< 0
"Cl CIl 2 >. <I) ..... () .9 rJ)
S "I:: i:O ..... ..s tIS vi vi .D S ~ < ..... 2
<I) 0 0 CIl tIS
'" > ~ Z ~ >. >. >. Oil tIS S ::, ..... ~
oJ) .....:l rJ) rJ) rJ) ~ Z CIl 8- "&.
0 CIl oJ) CIl oJ) "C;; CIl <U
Cii Cii u:l .... .... .... ~ 0
.... CIl CIl E-< 0 0 0 CIl ~ - E-< :=>
p.. <U <U ~ ..... ..... <I) <I)
.... "Cl .... "Cl Z ~ ~ .... ...... ...... ...... It::
"Cl tIS "Cl tIS j g j "Cl .;;: ...... ...... ......
"Cl 0 "Cl 0 u:l "Cl <U 0- 0- 0- S
<t: ~ < ~ U .....:l < ~ u:l u:l u:l rJ)
(l.)
.......
;::S
'"0
(l.)
..c:
u
tI)
~
o
.......
......
~
......
~
(l.)
S
(l.)
.......
0..
S
~
Distributed to Board: 2, Z f . <} Z:
Agenda Item No.
"
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
m~Jf, .'l~'.::""~EJD~,~flJ7. @~
,'ffi t:,1Q l.')ry 1(192
: I it, ~ .,.
L' ,
I ,
I ! !~".. . ':. ..'."'C'e
.~~.~ i,.".....) ~~-:1 U
80Af\D OF SUPERVjSO~S
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Date: March 4, 1992
Aqenda Item II:
12,0?() 'l /f/
Title: Street Name Signs
Issue: Approve the physical requirement standards for street name
signs.
Backqround: As part of the new E9ll system, the County is
developing a road name and street address ordinance to be scheduled
for a work session on April 1st with an estimated effective date of
September 1, 1992. A part of this ordinance will be a manual that
will define the requirements and procedures for road naming, road
sign location and installation, road sign standards, and house
addressing standards. Board action is requested to approve the
road sign standards at this time to allow staff to meet the
timelines for sign installation by September 1, 1992 and to advise
developers of sign requirements for roads currently under
construction.
Discussion: An integral part of the operable E9ll system is the
installation of street signs on public and private roads. VDOT
requires 9" high signs on primary/collector roads and a minimum of
6" high signs on local/subdivision roads. Based upon input from
the police department, fire/rescue department, JABA, and the
Virginia Department for the Visually Handicapped, staff recommends
an 8" high sign on local/subdivision roads. The signs specified
will satisfy their concerns while meeting the needs of the E9ll
system. As required by VDOT POlicy, the standard in Attachment A
has been submitted to Mr. Roosevelt for approval. He has confirmed
that the 8" sign for local/subdivision roads does meet the 6"
minimum requirement. Any variance to sign length, when necessary,
must be approved by the State Traffic Engineer. (Samples of signs
will be available at the meeting.)
'\.
Title: street Name signs
March 4, 1992
Page 2
The attached "STREET NAME SIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA" establishes the physical requirements for street signs.
This will be used as a basis for the bid package to install street
signs to implement the E9l1 system. The current schedule is to
bid, award, and give notice to proceed by June 1, 1992 in order for
the signs to be in place by September 1, 1992. In the meantime,
this sign standard is to be provided to developers installing signs
on roads under construction.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that this standard be accepted as
the guidance to be included the Street Name Ordinance manual and
request a resolution approving this standard.
staff Contact (s) :
Higgins.
Messrs. Tucker, Brandenburger, and Miss Jo
jdbm
92.025
Attachment
STREET NAME SIGN REQUIREMENTS
FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
1 February 1992
SHAPE
Horizontal Rectangle
COLOR
street Name Siqn
Message White on Green Field (Reflectorized)
Route Decal
Message Black on White Field (Non-reflectorized)
Block Number
Message White on Green Field (Reflectorized)
MATERIAL /
FEATURES
- High Intensity Reflectorized Sheeting (Double Faced)
- 0.100 Gauge Flat Aluminum Sign Blank
- Blank space in lower right hand corner for
Route Decal
- Blank space in upper right hand corner for
Block Number
SIZE
Local/Subdivision
Primary/Collector
Horizontal
Vertical
28" to 46" max
8" min
30" min to 48" max
9" min
Route Decal
Space
8" x 1.25"
12" x 2.5"
Block Number
Space
8" x 2.5"
12" x 3"
MESSAGE Prefix Capitals 2"C 3 "c
Name Capitals 5"C 6"C
Suffix capitals 2"C 3"C
Route Decal l"C min 2"C
Block No. Decal 2"C min 3"C
Distributed to So", d Z 7,
ar: 'CJ '9~
Agenda Item Nt' ,$0 It" -
... . cJ..LPdf.i--
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Date: March 4, 1992
Title: Access Easement - Buck's Elbow Tower site
Issue: During 1991, Albemarle County acquired property on Buck's
Elbow Mountain in order to locate communications equipment and
antennae related devices for public safety purposes. At that time,
a verbal agreement was reached regarding access to the site which
has now been reduced to writing by all parties.
Discussion: The attached agreement calls for an annual payment of
$300.00 as rent for the right to use the 1.4 mile access plus
$500.00 as the County's share of average road maintenance costs.
The costs are budgeted in the Police Department and are in line
with other access agreements held by the County.
Recommenda'tion: staff recommends that the Board authorize the
Chairman to sign the attached letter as presented.
staff Contac't(s): Messrs. Tucker and Huff.
RWT,Jr/dbm
92.016
Attachment
"
February 12, 1992
Nepenthe Land Corporation
Grey Rock Corporation
c/o Robert P. Buford, Esquire
Hunton & Williams
P. O. Box 1535
Richmond, Virginia 23212
Re: Buck's Elbow Tower Site
(Our File #ACG 91-986)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter is intended to memorialize an agreement with
respect to the use by Albemarle County of the access easement
which leads from the Jarman's Gap Road atop the Blue Ridge, over
your respective lands, to the tower site recently acquired by the
County from the Federal Aviation Administration (acting through
the Administrator of General Services) by deed which is recorded
in the Clerk's Office of Albemarle County at Deed Book 1168, Page
564.
It is our understanding that the County will pay to you
jointly, annually, the sum of $300.00 as rent for the right to
use this access easement, plus $500.00 as the County's share of
the yearly cost to maintain the road in its present character;
for an annual total of $800.00. It is our further understanding
that this amount is based upon an annual cost of maintenance of
approximately $2,500 total, from past experience; and that the
amount is subject to fluctuation in the future, again based upon
actual experience. .
It is our further understanding
payable to Nepenthe Land Corporation,
thereafter distribute the funds amongst
responsible for such distribution.
that we will make checks
and that Nepenthe will
you, the County not being
Because of Virginia law respecting fiscal commitments by
counties, beyond the fiscal year, the commitment of the County to
remit these funds annually is subject to annual appropriations by
the Board of Supervisors.
Page 2
February 12, 1992
The signature of the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors,
below, is made pursuant to a resolution of the said Board duly
adopted on , 1992.
David P. Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors
NEPENTHE LAND CORPORATION
By
GREY ROCK CORPORATION
By
,/"""\
i ~- ~
I I ,..)
I "
j ~ "'...,',,,-
~
,/""'-'''''',-
~: 'U'~ j'~'
\:':,.,/ i
~
"
.......7'
;, ';
" i _
'\ /
'I f
U
Edward H, Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
David p, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charlotte y, Humphris
Jack Jouett
March 6, 1992
Nepenthe Land Corporation
Grey Rock Corporation
c/o Robert P. Buford, Esquire
Hunton & Williams
P. O. Box 1535
Richmond, Virginia 23212
Dear Mr. Buford:
Charles S, Martin
Rivanna
Forrest R, Marshall. Jr
Scoltsville
Walter F, Perkins
While Hall
At its meeting on March 4, 1992, the Board of Supervisors
authorized the Chairman to sign the attached letter regarding
access to the Buck's Elbow Tower site. After the letter has been
signed by all the parties, please return a copy to the under-
signed for our files.
~-.Y2
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk,
LEN:ec
Attachment
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Richard E. Huff, II
Edward H, Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R, Marshall, Jr
Scoltsville
David p, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S, Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte y, Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
March 6, 1992
Nepenthe Land Corporation
Grey Rock Corporation
c/o Robert P. Buford, Esquire
Hunton & Williams
P. o. Box 1535
Richmond, Virginia 23212
Re: Buck's Elbow Tower Site
(Our File #ACG 91-986)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter is intended to memorialize an agreement
wi th respect to the use by Albemarle County of the access
easement which leads from the Jarman's Gap Road atop the
Blue Ridge, over your respective lands, to the tower site
recently acquired by the' County from the Federal Aviation
Administration (acting through the Administrator of General
Services) by deed which is recorded in the Clerk's Office of
Albemarle County at Deed Book 1168, Page 564.
It is our understanding that the County will pay to you
jointly, annually, the sum of $300.00 as rent for the right
to use this access easement, plus $500.00 as the County's
share of the yearly cost to maintain the road in its present
character; for an annual total of $800.00. It is our
further understanding that this amount is based upon an
annual cost of maintenance of approximately $2,500 total,
from past experience; and that the amount is subject to
fluctuation in the future, again based upon actual experi-
ence.
It is our further understanding that we will
checks payable to Nepenthe Land Corporation, and
Nepenthe will thereafter distribute the funds amongst
the County not being responsible for such distribution.
make
that
you,
-'
Nepenthe Land Corporation
March 6, 1992
Page 2
Because of Virginia law respecting fiscal commitments
by counties, beyond the fiscal year, the commitment of the
County to remit these funds annually is subj ect to annual
appropriations by the Board of Supervisors.
The signature of the Chairman of the Board of Super-
visors, below, is made pursuant to a resolution of the said
Board duly adopted on March 4, 1992.
~ r
{~~P#~~ '
David P. Bowerman, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors
fJistributed to Board~Z. 2j .. ') ~
Agenda Item No.
-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5861
C9U~~T_Y OF ALBEMARLE
~-i) r,.. ~,' ,'"7) r'= f!'-j "".''''''] ,.-..
I f I ,; '. \' ~ t.; , , l'-..,' :
~l,' \:,~F.'~;,~,""" 0 ".y'I'I",~':2'J:.u~), ilr/)
. I' \ - :J...I \\ ,~.t,
I U l'......-"~..." " , , .. I
, 'l ", ,.."..-rr-',.,.- .
".::~.... \....;:..; :.~ U u ~ ,)
BOJ\},'D OF SUPERVISOftS
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Date:
March 4, 1992
Aaenda Item #:
ire ,},/ UA
() J.o~() .17.../
Title: Souths ide Transfer station
Issue: Board decision on the status of the Transfer station.
Backaround: Southside Transfer station is a facility that was
designed to provide an alternate location for citizens in the
vicinity of the Keene Landfill to deposit only domestic solid
waste subsequent to the Keene Landfill closure in August 1990.
The transfer station was designed to be a full-time manned
facility and includes a roll away container to service a trash
compactor, a concrete slab for four (4) large recycling bins and
three (3) small bins, and a small operator's office. The facility
was to be open 40 hours a week. This facility is currently funded
in the Capital Improvements Program with a balance of $221,000.
The site plan to construct this facility was approved and signed
on 11 October 1990. This approval has expired and would require
re-submittal to reactivate. The 7 acre (~) site located on Route
715 just west of Route 20 was purchased by the County of Albemarle
in February 1990.
At the Board's direction, three public meetings (20 November, 3
December and 4 December, 1990) were held to discuss solid waste
collection issues with citizens in the vicinity. Despite adequate
lead time and wide circulation of the notice, ten (10) citizens
attended these meetings. The majority opinion of these citizens
was not to support construction of this facility in order to allow
private haulers the opportunity to expand into the southside area.
Several people advocating deferral of construction of this
facility lived in close proximity and had opposed construction
since the project was initiated. At the time the transfer station
was designed, a user fee of $2.25 per trip was to be charged.
There was no provision for charging by weight. Based on the
estimated costs at that time, the transfer station would generate
revenue to offset the total operational cost.
FAX (804) 972-4060
Title: Souths ide Transfer station
March 4, 1992
Page 2
Subsequent to the Keene closure, a solid waste container was
provided at the entrance to the Keene Landfill as an interim
measure pending service being provided by private refuse
collectors. After five months of operation, the Board authorized
its removal in January, 1991. Subsequent illegal dumping
activities at the entrance to the Keene Landfill have declined
over the past year. A weekly inspection usually results in one
cleanup per month.
Discussion: site plan revisions and the capital cost to include a
scale would be necessary to implement a weight based charge
comparable with the Ivy Landfill. The capital cost for site
revisions and scale would be $41,000. At Ivy, the minimum fee is
$1.25 per trip for up to 80 Ibs. with a pro-rata charge based on
the current $32/ton tip fee for any additional. Based on an
estimated $45/ton tip fee and using $2.25 per trip, the station
would not be self-supporting but would incur an approximate
$83,000 shortfall. To be self supporting, the user fee would
increase to approximately $4 per trip based upon a $45/ton tip
fee. Cost estimates for various usage scenarios are in Attachment
A. In view of necessary site changes, plan review and
construction season impacts, the earliest this facility could be
placed into operation would be Spring/Summer, 1993.
Action/Issues: This CIP project was placed on hold for two years
to determine if private refuse service was feasible. Staff
requests the Board take action on this project; to either extend
the on-hold status pending further assessment of alternatives,
proceed with implementation, or cancel and reallocate these funds.
Issues to consider that are impacted by the Souths ide Transfer
station:
1. Operational Responsibility - The County no longer operates a
landfill. Rivanna Solid Waste Authority has the operational
responsibility for the Ivy Landfill. If the County were to
manage the transfer facility, additional staffing would be
needed. At issue is whether the County should operate and
maintain such facilities or is RSWA the more appropriate
agency?
2. Equity in level of service to all citizens - One of the
primary reasons this project was not implemented was due to
the equity of service to all County residents. County
residents now have three resources for trash disposal:
private refuse haulers, personal delivery to the Ivy Landfill,
or illegal disposal. A separate transfer station is not
warranted, unless private service is not being provided or
Title: Soutbside Transfer station
March 4, 1992
Page 3
made available to residents in the southeast part of the
County. At this time, staff does not have definitive
information to determine the level of private service being
provided in this area and until an assessment can be
completed, it would be premature to recommend the construction
of the transfer station. In addition, as other areas of the
County are equally or even more remote to the Ivy Landfill,
there would be a need to examine the solid waste collection
program county-wide before proceeding with the transfer
station.
3. Recycling Aspects - The initial transfer station design does
provide a limited area for recycling bins. This should be
evaluated to ensure the design and operation can be
effectively integrated into the current County recycling
program.
Recommendations: continue to hold the project funding in abeyance
pending further assessment of (1) availability of private refuse
service at reasonable fees to be determined within 60 days and (2)
if service is not expected to be available, to re-examine the
County's solid waste collection program and report to the Board by
July 1, 1992.
ContactCs): Messrs. Tucker, Brandenburger, and Ms. Higgins
/dbm
92.027
COST ANALYSIS
SERVICE AREA INCLUDES 3,515 persons (based on 1990 census)
(See attached area map)
2.53 persons/avg household
Average solid waste generated = 1,2001bs/person/year
$2.25 fee 80% Usage 50% Usage 30% Usage
----------------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenue $ 60,000 $ 37,500 $ 22,500
Operational Cost 110,000 81,500 62,500
--------- --------- ---------
Net Operational $ 50,000 * $ 44,000 $ 40,000
$4.12 fee 80% Usage 50% Usage 30% Usage
----------------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenue $110,000 $ 69,000 $ 41,000
Operational Cost 110,000 81,500 62,500
--------- --------- ---------
Net Operational $ 0 $ 12,500 $ 21,500
EXAMPLE:
. Trip Fee $2.25
. REVENUE at 80% USAGE -
80% x 3,515 persons/2.53 x 2 trips/mo x 12 mo x 2.25 = $60,000
. OPERATIONAL COST -
(1,200LB/YR /2000LB/TON) x 80% x 3,515 x $45 tip/ton + FIXED
COSTS OF $34,000 = $109,924 or $110,000
. ANNUAL NET OPERATIONAL COST IS $110,000 - $60,000 = $50,000 *
ATTACHMENT A
DATE
AJ~~
!
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86
Jj./
4, /19;1
12. 6301., /'II
fxIh iJ. fAt'l/lilAL :x ~
/
iA Ik~ II
/
, "
Distributed to Board: ?, l ~- , S'l,
Agenda Hem No.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5841
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COUNTY OF ALBEM/-'tkL....
[;;r;::J 1jf1 nf~ r
"__c>L.I..w.;,,~- n
\i/ j
ttR 2t3 1992)1 !
~ S1Ei~ U
BOARD OF SUPERVISO~S
Date: February 26, 1992
Aaenda Item #:
qli ~ 30 If.lt)~'
Title:
Municipal Rate Agreement - Virginia Power
Issue: Local governments throughout the state participate in a
negotiated agreement for the purchase of electricity from the
utility companies servicing their area. This agreement,negotiated
every three years through the joint efforts of the Virginia
Association of Counties and the Virginia Municipal League brings
stability to the budgeting process for the expected rate increases
and has historically resulted in considerable savings over
increases passed on to other classes of customers.
Backaround: Staff requests the Board to authorize the County
Executive to execute the new agreement which stipulates that base
rates will not increase for the first two years and in the third
year, base rates will increase less than 3%. In addition to base
rates, the agreement calls for capacity charges to increase
approximately 3%, 5%, and 2% respectively for each of the three
years of the agreement.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the County Executive be
authorized to execute the Virginia Power Agreement for FY 92, 93,
and 94 as outlined in the attached memorandum from VACO.
Staff Contact(s):
Messrs. Tucker and Huff
92.018
Attachment
President
~thleen K. Seefeldt
Prince William County
President-Elect
!fury G. DanIel
Ches~rlleld County
First Vice President
Peggy R WIley
G..-avllle County
Second Vice President
WUlWn H.H. 8levlnJ
Smyth County
SecrelllTy- Treasurer
E. Vltgll Sompoal Jr.
Scoll County
Immediate Past President
Steven A MtG.-.
Roanoke County
BoIlrd RepresentativtS
Regitml
WUlIam E. Belvin
Glouces~r County
Regitmi
John J. Purcell
Loulaa County
Regitm3
Oovld A. Kaechele
Henric:o County
Regitm4
Marvin W. Scott
Prince Edward County
Marlon B. WUllaaw
Prince George County
Regitm5
J. MlcNel Oavldocn
~bell County
Region 6
Brad C Rosenberger
Culpeper County
Region 7
John O. Jenkin.
PrInce William County
John M. Poner
Stafford County
. Region 8
Gerry W. Hyland
Fairfax County
~ therln. IC. Hanley
Fairfax County
Ellen M. Bozman
Arlington County
William T. Newman
Arlington County
Regitm9
Clad.. w, Curry
Augusta County
Harper R Wagner
Sa th County
Regitm 10
Wanda C "Wendy" Wingo
Botetourt County
Glnrd us G. "Gus" Forry
Franklin County
Regitm 11
MasaI A Vaughan Sr.
PuIasld County
PllSt Presidents
Jack O. Edwarcb
James City County
W D. "Beny Gray
RIchmond County
Ex<<utive Director
James o. Campbell
General Counsel
c. Flippo Hlcb
i I . 1
VIRGINIA ASSOOATION OF COUNTIES-
1001 East Broad Street. Suite LL20 . Richmond, VirginiJ 23219-19?~~J804)_~~~2. fax (804) ~~
To:
Key Officials
J)
From:
James D. Campbell,
Executive Director
Date:
December 3, 1991
Re:
Virqinia Power Contract
We are pleased to announce the successful
conclusion by the VML/VACo Virginia Power Steering
Commi t tee of the rates for a new three-year contact
with Virginia Power for electric service to local
governments in the company's service area. It is
anticipated that the terms and conditions portion of
the contract will be finalized this week.
Initially Virginia .Power sought increased
revenues from localities and is currently seeking an
increase in jurisdictional rates from the State
Corporation Commission (and unquestionably will
continue to do so. every year). The agreement which has
now been negotiated for local governments will provide
for no increase in base rates for the first two years
and in the third year an increase of less than 3% over
the rates which were in effect during the last year of
the agreement which expired on June 30, 1991.
This marks the sixth time that a long term
agreement has been negotiated with Virginia Power since
1975 and although never formally computed, we are
conf ident that these agreements have resul ted in very
substantial savings to our localities. Addi tionally,
the three-year contract adds a level of predictability
in the cost for electric service.
No local government is bound by the rates and
terms of the negotiated agreement because the
contracting power rests solely with each governing
body. Nonetheless, the members of the Steering
Committee, who have devoted many hours to this project,
and the Committee's attorneys and consultants are
extremely pleased with the outcome of negotiations and
enthusiastically recommend that the three-year
agreement in the form which will be presented by
(over)
~
Virginia Power be approved and adopted by each local
government affected.
Notwithstanding the fact that base rates will be
flat for two years and only slightly increased in the
third year, localities need to be aware that increases
in the fuel adjustment clause are predicted. As is
true for all Virginia Power ratepayers, local
governments pay for any increases in fuel costs through
the fuel adjuGtment clause. Local governments also pay
a portion of Virginia Power's capacity charges through
the fuel adjustment clause. Capacity charges are the
charges which Virginia Power must pay to independent
power producers which have built generating plants
under contracts approved by the SCC. Such plants
substitute for new plants which Virginia Power would be
required to construct in order to meet the anticipated
growth of electricity usage in its service area and
thereby guard against blackouts and brownouts. Several
independent plants are expected to become operational
within the next three years. It is estimated that
local governments' share of such capacity costs will
increase total charges to local governments ,by
approximately 3% for the year beginning July 1, 1991
and 5% and 2%, respectively, in the two following
years.
Our attorneys will be
questions which you may have.
at (804) 788-6652 and Howard
at (804) 643-1991.
happy to respond to any
You can reach Flip Hicks
Dobbins and Sarah Finley
- 2 -
COUNTY OF ALBEMAkLL
'... i!{. ';:~~ il'; [,\, ""i<, ':;.I '...
~ ~ i...ll- ,"', iA'- ~\.<.'
~'~E~,~~,~:Y
, ',,?J1,~ '.::::> ','i,''''' . ,_I 1':',..,..
EXECUTIVE OFF!~;"
,~~"=,,, ,w~, r1
:: D l\V,
"".,o,,,i' 'l.U
':U: ~j ~ ,
'. ,
Edward H, Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R, Marshall. Jr,
Scottsville
David p, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S, Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte y, Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
March 6, 1992
Mr. Frank E. Berndsen
Virginia Power
1199 5th Street, SW
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Dear Mr. Berndsen:
At its meeting on March 4, 1992, the Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors authorized the County Executive to execute the
enclosed Agreements for the Purchase of Electric Service by Muni-
cipalities and Counties of the Commonwealth of Virginia from
Virginia Electric and Power Company. Enclosed are the three
signed agreements. After the agreements have been approved by
Virginia Power, please return one copy to us for our files.
Very truly yours,
~:t~CMC
LEN: ec
Enclosures (3)
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Richard E. Huff, II
..
AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF
ELECTRIC SERVICE BY MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES
OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
FROM VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
This Agreement, made this 24th day of February, 1992 between
County of Albemarle, a unit of local government of the Commonwealth
of Virginia, hereinafter called the "Customer", and the Virginia
Electric and Power Company, hereinafter called the "Company",
provides that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
herein contained, the parties hereto contract and agree with each
other as follows:
1. PURCHASE AND SALE
A. Purchases From the Company
The Customer will purchase from the Company and the Company will sell
to the Customer, pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement and the
Terms and Conditions For The Purchase of Electric Service By
Municipalities and Counties and to the applicable schedules of
charges, attached hereto and made a part hereof, the electric service
requested by the Customer (including the service being furnished on
the effective date of the Agreement) within the territory served by
the Company in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
B. Purchases From the Customer
The Company will purchase electricity under a separate agreement from
the Customer's generating facilities in accordance with the Public
utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) and the Federal and
Virginia rules that implement (PURPA), if the generating unit
qualifies for such treatment.
2. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 1991 to June 30,
1994.
3 . RATES AND CHARGES
The schedules of charges available hereunder and applicable
conditions are identified as Attachments A through S' and listed
below. Any use of electricity for which no schedule of charges is
shown will be supplied in accordance with the Miscellaneous Light and
Power schedule (Attachment A).
..
A. Miscellaneous Light and Power Service and Traffic Control
Service
B. All-Electric Building Service and Dual Fuel Systems
C. Water Pumping, Sewage Pumping and Sewage Disposal Service
D. Large Miscellaneous Light and Power Service (Schedule 130,
formerly Schedule GCM)
E. Thermal storage
F. curtailable Service - Schedule CSCM
G. Standby Generator - Schedule SGCM
H. Roadway, Directional and Area Lighting Service - High
Pressure Sodium Vapor (Schedule 150)
I. Roadway, Directional and Area Lighting Service
Incandescent, Mercury Vapor, and Urbanlites (Schedule 151)
J. Street Lighting Fixtures on Bridges and Overpasses
(Schedule 152)
K. Street Lighting - Special Fixtures (Schedule 153)
L. Street Lighting - Customer Owned (Schedule 154)
M. Temporary Service Charge
N. Excess Facilities Service Rate
O. Miscellaneous and Standby Charges (Schedule C)
P. Mercury Vapor to High Pressure Sodium Vapor Conversion
Charges
Q. Street Lighting Patrol Service
R. Rider A - Fuel Adjustment Clause
S. Rider J - CM Interruptible Electric Water Heating Service -
Residential Services
For qualifying individual accounts, the Customer may elect companion
load management rate schedules or riders as follows: Curtailable
Service, Standby Generator, or Rider J-CM Interruptible Residential
Water Heating in effect generally for retail service in Virginia.
The curtailable Service schedule is available for miscellaneous light
and power accounts billed on Large Miscellaneous Light and Power
Service (Schedule 130). The Standby Generator schedule is available
for any miscellaneous light and power account and Rider J-CM is
available for individually metered residential services. These load
management rates will be revised from time to time in the same manner
as approved for other retail customers in Virginia.
The specific application of the applicable rate schedule to specific
connection points may, at the request of the Customer, be enumerated
in Exhibits to be attached hereto. Other service points may be
identified, in writing, for inclusion under this Agreement at such
times as the need for service develops. Nothing in this Agreement
shall be construed as precluding the parties hereto from entering
into a separate contract for services of a special nature.
4. EFFECTIVE DATE
The rates applicable hereunder are effective July 1, 1991. For
service rendered on and after July 1, 1991, CUstomer will pay to the
Company (or the Company will pay to the Customer) the difference
between the charges as calculated under the rates attached hereto and
the charges as previously paid.
..
5. GENERAL
A. Unless otherwise specifically agreed in writing, this Agreement
cancels and supersedes as of the effective date hereof all previous
agreements and supplemental agreements between the Customer and the
Company for electric service covered by this Agreement. This
Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the
successors or assigns of each of the parties hereof.
B. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Customer and the Company
only when executed by a duly authorized official or authorized
representative thereof, and shall not be modified by any promise,
agreement or representation of any agent or employee of either party
hereto except in writing and executed by such a duly authorized
official or officer.
C. The obligations of the Company and the Customer for service under
this Agreement are subject to appropriations by Customer's governing
body to pay for such service.
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
By:
Title
~ - ~ /1/_ ~ _ ~:~
t . Title ~z:; ~/~
By:
At a regular
,~f,
(Information requested below to be filled in only if approval
obtained or required by Customer.)
meeting of the~~+/~f the
of ~~ held on
19 ~ ).-- ,
,
this Agreement was presented for approval
as prescribed by its rules of order, was approved, and the above
officer was authorized to execut~n i~
Attes ~- ~
f"
'irginia Electric and Power Company
Attachment A
SCHEDULE 101
,
COUNTY
MISCELLANEOUS LIGHT AND POWER SERVICE AND
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
I. APPLICABILITY
This schedule is applicable for miscellaneous light and power
service and traffic control service for any county, or board,
agency or authority thereof.
II. MONTHLY RATE
A. For Miscellaneous Light and Power Service:
Energy Charge per kWh:
Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93
7.364<::
7-1-93
7.589<::
B. Traffic Control Service:
Energy charge per kWh:
Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93
5.628<::
7-1-93
5.745<::
c. For purposes of billing for unmetered service,
kilowatthours shall be estimated based upon connected load
multiplied by hours usage.
D. The minimum charge for Miscellaneous Light and Power
and/or Traffic Control Service shall be such as may be
contracted for but not less than $5.50 per billing month
per meter or in the absence of a meter, per connection.
Such minimum charge shall be increased in the amount of
the applicable fuel adjustment factor on all kilowatthours
used.
E. Each kilowatthour used is subject to
changes in fuel costs in accordance
Adjustment Clause attached hereto.
adjustment for
with the Fuel
III. PAYMENTS
Bills are due and payable from the billing date as provided
in Section VII of the Terms and Conditions of which this schedule
is a part.
(Continued)
Electric-Virginia
County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC122a.man
1"
Attachment A
SCHEDULE 101
COUNTY
MISCELLANEOUS LIGHT AND POWER SERVICE AND
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
(Continued)
IV. All traffic control signals shall be installed by and
maintained at the cost and expense of the Customer.
V. FESTOON AND OTHER DECORATIVE LIGHTING
A. Festoon and other decorative lighting facilities
installed, owned and maintained by or for the Customer
may be attached to Company owned poles provided the
Customer pays to the Company the rates and charges
contained in section II.A., c., D., and E. of this
schedule, and appropriate charge(s) as outlined in the
Temporary Service Charge schedule attached hereto, and
provided such installation is approved in advance by
the Company. permission to attach on poles or
structures not owned by the Company must be secured by
the Customer from the owner of such poles or
structures.
B. The Customer assumes all responsibility for such
festoon or other decorative lighting installations and
agrees to save the Company harmless from any loss,
cost, injury or damage to persons or property
resulting out of or arising from the installation,
operation, use, non-use or removal of such
installation.
VI. AVAILABILITY OF SCHEDULE
This schedule will be available on and after July 1, 1991.
Electric-Virginia
County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC122a.man
<r
Attachment B
SCHEDULE 111
COUNTY
ALL-ELECTRIC BUILDING SERVICE
AND DUAL FUEL SYSTEMS
I. APPLICABILITY
This schedule is applicable for all electric building service
for any county, or board, agency or authority thereof which owns or
leases a building for public purposes in which electric heating
equipment has been permanently installed and in which electricity
is used for all purposes including space heating, water heating
and/or cooking. The space heating system may be either a total
electric system or a qualifying dual fuel electric heat pump system
with automatic changeover to fossil fuel in lieu of electric
resistance heat when the outside temperature drops below the
balance point of the electric heat pump unit (customarily 320F -
350F) .
II. MONTHLY RATE
A. Energy Charge per kWh:
Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93
7-1-93
for billing months
of June through
September
7.364<::
7.589<::
for billing months
of October through
May
6.953<::
7.162<::
B. The minimum charge shall be such as may be contracted for
but not less than $5.50 per billing month per meter.
Such minimum charge shall be increased in the amount of
the applicable fuel adjustment factor on all
kilowatthours used.
C. Each kilowatthour used is subject to adjustment for
changes in fuel costs in accordance with the Fuel
Adjustment Clause attached hereto.
III. PAYMENTS
Bills are due and payable from the billing date as provided
in Section VII of the Terms and Conditions of which this schedule
is a part.
VI. AVAILABILITY OF SCHEDULE
This schedule will be available on and after July 1, 1991.
Electric-Virginia
County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC122a.man
(
Attachment C
SCHEDULE 121
COUNTY
WATER PUMPING, SEWAGE PUMPING AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL SERVICE
I. APPLICABILITY
This schedule is applicable for water pumping, sewage pumping
and sewage disposal service for any county, or board, agency or
authority thereof.
II. MONTHLY RATE
A. Energy Charge per kWh:
Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
For all
on-peak kWh
7.364<::
7.589<::
For all
Off-peak kWh
6.232<::
6.412<::
B. The minimum charge shall be such as may be contracted for
but not less than $5.50 per billing month per meter.
Such minimum charge shall be increased in the amount of
the applicable fuel adjustment factor on all
kilowatthours used.
C. Each kilowatthour used is subject to adjustment for
changes in fuel costs in accordance with the Fuel
Adjustment Clause attached hereto.
III. PAYMENTS
Bills are due and payable from the billing date as provided
in section VII of the Terms and Conditions of which this schedule
is a part.
IV. DETERMINATION OF ON-PEAK AND OFF-PEAK HOURS
A. on-peak hours are defined as the hours between 7 a.m.
and 10 p.m. (EST) daily.
B. Off-peak hours are defined as all other hours than
those listed in Section IV.A. above.
V. This schedule will be available on and after July 1, 1991.
Electric-Virginia
County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC122a.man
Vi~ginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP123a.man-1
Attachment D
SCHEDULE 130
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
LARGE MISCELLANEOUS LIGHT AND-POWER SERVICE
I. APPLICABILITY
This schedule is applicable for the supply of 50 kW or more to any account
(Customer) for any municipality or county or any board, agency or authority
thereof, for miscellaneous light and power service.
II.
30-DAY RATE
A. Basic Customer Charge per billing
month
Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
$72.58 $72.58
B. Plus Power Supply Demand Charge
All kW of Power Supply Demand (per kW)
@
$9.766
$9.766
C. Plus Distribution Demand Charge
First 700 kW of billing demand (per kW) @
Next 4300 kW of billing demand (per kW) @
Additional kW of billing demand (per kW) @
$1. 412
$1.128
$0.971
$1. 412
$1.128
$0.971
D. Plus RKVA Demand Charge
All rkVA of Demand (per rkVA)
@
$0.15
$0.15
E. Plus Energy Charge
First 24,000 kWh (per kWh)
Next 186,000 kWh* (per kWh)
Additional kWh (per kWh)
@
@
@
2.929(:
2.253(:
1. 820(:
3.043(:
2.367(:
1.934(:
*If Power supply Demand is 1000 kW or more, add 210 kWh for each kW
of demand over 1000 kW.
F. Plus each kWh used is subject to adjustment for changes in fuel
costs in accordance with the Fuel Adjustment Clause attached
hereto.
G. The minimum charge shall be such as may be contracted for, but
not less than the sum of the charges in A., B., C., and D.,
above.
(continued)
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
Vi~gin1a Electric and Power Company
3GAP123a.man-2
Attachment D
SCHEDULE 130
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
LARGE MISCELLANEOUS LIGHT AND POWER SERVICE
III. DETERMINATION OF POWER SUPPLY DEMAND
A.
Except as provided under III. B., the kW of demand billed
II. B. shall be the highest of:
under
1. The highest average kW measured in any 30-minute interval during
the current billing month, or
2. 90% of the highest average kW of demand measured at this
location in any 30-minute interval during the billing months of
June through September of the preceding eleven billing months,
or
3 . 50 kW.
B. Where the kW of demand determined under III. A. is 1000 kW or more,
the kW of demand billed under II. B. shall be the highest of:
1. The highest average kW measured in any 30-minute interval of the
current billing month during the on-peak hours of:
a. 10 a.m. to 10 p.m., Mondays through Fridays, for the billing
months of June through September.
b. 7 a.m. to 10 p.m., Mondays through Fridays, for all other
billing months.
2. 90% of the highest kW of demand at this location as determined
under III. B. 1., above during the billing months of June
through september of the preceding eleven billing months, or
3 . 1000 kW.
(Continued)
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
vi~ginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP123a.man-3
Attachment D
SCHEDOLE 130
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
LARGE MISCELLANEOOS LIGHT AND POWER SERVICE
(Continued)
IV. DETERMINATION OF DISTRIBUTION DEMAND
The Distribution Demand shall be billed only where the service voltage is
less than 69 kV. The kW of demand billed under II. C. shall be such as may be
contracted for, but not less than the higher of:
A. The highest average kW measured in any 3D-minute interval during the
current and preceding eleven billing months, or
B. 50 kW
V. DETERMINATION OF RKVA DEMAND
The rkVA demand shall be billed only where the kW of demand is determined
under III. B. The rkVA of demand billed shall be the highest average rkVA
measured in any 3D-minute interval during the current billing month.
VI. METER READING AND BILLING
When the actual number of days between meter readings is more or less than
30 days, the Basic Customer Charge, the Power Supply Demand Charge, the
Distribution Demand Charge, the rkVA Demand Charge, the quantity of kWh in each
block of the Energy Charge, and the minimum charge of the 3D-day rate will each
be multiplied by the actual number of days in the billing period and divided by
30.
VII. PAYMENTS
Bills are due and payable from the billing date as provided in section VII
of the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement of which this schedule is a part.
VIII. SERVICE AVAILABLE
Normally, service will be supplied in accordance with Section II of the
Terms and Conditions of the Agreement of which this schedule is a part.
(Continued)
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
v~rginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP123a.man-4
Attachment D
SCHEDULE 130
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
LARGE MISCELLANEOUS LIGHT AND POWER SERVICE
(Continued)
IX. STANDBY, MAINTENANCE OR PARALLEL OPERATION SERVICE
A Customer that requires standby, maintenance or parallel operation
service may elect service under this schedule provided the Customer contracts
for the maximum kW which the Company is to supply. Standby, maintenance or
parallel operation service is subject to the following provisions:
A. suitable relays and protective apparatus shall be furnished,
installed, and maintained at the Customer's expense in accordance
with section XII.A. of the Agreement.
B. In case the maximum measured kW demand, or 85% of any kVA demand
measured, exceeds the contract demand, the contract demand shall be
increased by such excess demand.
C. Where the service voltage is less than 69 kV, the demand billed under
II.C. shall be the contract demand.
XI. TERM OF CONTRACT
The term of contract for the purchase of electricity under this schedule
shall be such as may be mutually agreed upon, but for not less than one year.
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
t. virginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP124a.man-1
Attachment E
SCHEDULE 131
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
THERMAL STORAGE
I. APPLICABILITY
This schedule is applicable for the supply of 50 kW or more on a
voluntary basis under the Company's Thermal Energy storage Program to any
account (Customer) who operates electric thermal energy storage equipment.
Under this program the type, design, and capacity of the equipment must be
inspected and approved by the Company.
II. 30-DAY RATE
Effective
07-01-91 Thru 6-30-93
07-01-93
A. Basic Customer Charge per billing
month.
$72.58
$72.58
B. Plus Power Supply Demand Charge
All KW of Power Supply Demand (per kW)
@ $9.766
$9.766
C. Plus Distribution Demand Charge
First 700 kW of billing demand (per kW) @
Next 4300 kW of billing demand (per kW) @
Additional kW of billing demand (per kW) @
D. Plus RkVA Demand Charge
All RkVA of Demand (per rkVA)
$1. 412
$1.128
$0.971
$1. 412
$1.128
$0.971
@ $0.15
$0.15
E. Plus Energy Charge
First 210 KWh per kW of Power Supply
Demand (per kWh)
Additional kWh (per kWh)
@ 2.253<:
@ 1.820<:
2.367<:
1.934<:
F. Plus each kWh used is subject to adjustment for changes in fuel
costs in accordance with the Fuel Adjustment Clause attached
hereto.
G. The minimum charge shall be such as may be contracted for, but
not less than the sum of the charges in Paragraphs A., B., C.,
and D. above.
(Continued)
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
Superseding Schedule Effective 09-01-89
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
vrrginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP124a.man-2
Attachment E
SCHEDULE 131
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
THERMAL STORAGE
III. DETERMINATION OF POWER SUPPLY DEMAND
The kW of demand billed under Paragraph II.B. shall be the highest
of:
A. The highest average kW measured in any 30-minute 'interval of the
current billing month during the on-peak hours of:
1. 10 a.m. to 10 p.m., Mondays through Fridays, for the period
of May 1 through October 31, or
2. 6 a.m. to 1 p.m. and 5 p.m. to 10 p.m., Mondays through
Fridays, for the period of November 1 through April 30, or
B. 90% of the highest kW of demand at this location as determined
under Paragraph III.A. during the billing months of June through
September of the preceding eleven billing months, or
C. 50 kW.
During the period of November 1 through April 30, should the highest
average kW measured in any 30-minute interval during the off-peak hours of
1 p.m. to 5 p.m., Mondays through Fridays, exceed the on-peak demand
determined under Paragraph A. above by more than the installed capacity of
the thermal storage system, the Company reserves the right to include these
hours in the determination of Power Supply Demand.
IV. DETERMINATION OF DISTRIBUTION DEMAND
The Distribution Demand shall be billed only when the service voltage
is less than 69 kV. The kW of demand billed under Paragraph II.C. shall
be such as may be contracted for, but not less than the higher of:
A. The highest average kW measured in any 30-minute interval during
the current and preceding eleven billing months, or
B. 50 kW
(Continued)
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
Superseding Schedule Effective 09-01-89
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
virginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP124a.man-3
Attachment E
SCHEDULE 131
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
THERMAL STORAGE
V. DETERMINATION OF RKVA DEMAND
The rkVA demand shall be billed only when the Power Supply Demand is
1000 kW or greater. The rkVA of demand billed shall be the highest average
rkVA measured in any 30-minute interval during the current billing month.
VI. METER READING AND BILLING
When the actual number of days between meter readings is more or less
than 30 days, the Basic Customer Charge, the Power Supply Demand Charge,
the Distribution Demand Charge, the RkVA Demand Charge, the quantity of kWh
in the initial block of the Energy Charge, and the minimum charge of the
30-day rate will each be multiplied by the actual number of days in the
billing period and divided by 30.
VII. PAYMENTS
Bills are due and payable from the billing date as provided in
section VII of the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement of which this
Schedule is a part.
VIII. SERVICE AVAILABLE
Normally, service will be supplied in accordance with Section II of
the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement of which this Schedule is a part.
IX. STANDBY, MAINTENANCE OR PARALLEL OPERATION SERVICE
A Customer that requires standby, maintenance or parallel operation
service may elect service under this schedule provided the Customer
contracts for the maximum kW which the Company is to supply. Standby,
maintenance or parallel operation service is subject to the following
provisions:
A. suitable relays and protective apparatus shall be furnished,
installed, and maintained at the Customer's expense in
accordance with section XII.A. of the Agreement.
(Continued)
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
Superseding Schedule Effective 09-01-89
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
virginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP124a.man-4
Attachment E
SCHEDULE 131
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
THERMAL STORAGE
IX. STANDBY, MAINTENANCE OR PARALLEL OPERATION SERVICE (Continued)
B. In case the maximum measured kW demand, or 85% of any kVA demand
measured, exceeds the contract demand, the contract demand shall
be increased by such excess demand.
C. Where the service voltage is less than 69 kV, the demand billed
under II.C. shall be the contract demand.
X. TERM OF CONTRACT
The term of contract for the purchase of electricity under this
schedule shall be such as may be mutually agreed upon, but for not less
than one year.
Electric-virginia
Municipal-County
Superseding Schedule Effective 09-01-89
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
V~rginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP125a.man-1
Attachment F
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL
SCHEDULE CSCM
CURTAILABLE SERVICE
I. APPLICABILITY
This schedule is applicable on a voluntary basis to any account
(customer) who purchases electricity in accordance with any
applicable rate schedule provided the account has, under the
Company's normal metering policies, a meter capable of recording
usage over 30 minute intervals. This schedule is not applicable
to customers who elect Schedule SGCM. Revisions to this schedule
may be made in accordance with the provisions in the Agreement For
the Purchase of Electric Service by Municipalities and Counties.
II. NOTIFICATION, CURTAILMENT PROVISIONS, AND MONTHLY BILLING TO THE
CUSTOMER
A. curtailments may be requested by the Company only from May 16
through September 30 (Summer) and from December 1 through
March 31 (Winter). During the Summer, the potential
curtailment period is from 2 p.m. to , p.m. During the
Winter, the potential curtailment period is from 6 a.m. to 11
a.m., or from 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. Company requested
curtailments are limited to no more than one per day. For
each calendar year, the total number of curtailments shall be
limited to 13 curtailments during the winter and 19
curtailments during the Summer. The Customer may elect
curtailments for one or both seasons.
B. If curtailments are elected for the Summer, the Customer shall
specify the Summer Firm Demand, which shall be the maximum
demandthe Company is to supply during curtailment periods of
the Summer season. Summer Firm Demand my be changed upon
written notice subsequent to September 30 but prior to May 16.
The Customer may elect to increase the Summer Firm Demand
during the current Summer season upon written notice, subject
to reimbursement in accordance with Paragraph III. Such
increase in Summer Firm Demand shall not affect any previous
billing for failure to reduce to the Summer Firm Demand then
applicable.
C. If curtailments are elected for the Winter, the Customer shall
specify the Winter Firm Demand, which shall be the maximum
demand the Company is to supply during curtailment periods of
the winter season. winter Firm Demand may be changed upon
written notice subsequent to March 31 but prior to December 1.
The Customer may elect to increase the winter Firm Demand
(Continued)
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
This Filing Effective 05-01-90
V~rginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP125a.man-2
Attachment F
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL
SCHEDULE CSCM
CURTAILABLE SERVICE
II. NOTIFICATION, CURTAILMENT PROVISIONS, AND MONTHLY BILLING TO
THE CUSTOMER (Continued)
during the current Winter season upon written notice, subject
to reimbursement in accordance wi th Paragraph III. Such
increase in winter Firm Demand shall not affect any previous
billing for failure to reduce to the Winter Firm Demand then
applicable.
D. When notification of requested curtailment is provided at a
time other than during a potential curtailment period, the
Customer shall reduce load to the applicable Summer/Winter
Firm Demand within 30 minutes of receiving notification, or at
the beginning of the next potential curtailment period,
whichever occurs later. When notification of requested
curtailment is provided during a potential curtailment period,
the Customer shall reduce load to the applicable Summer/Winter
Firm Demand within 30 minutes of receiving notification. The
Customer shall remain at or below the firm level until
notification by the Company, or until the end of the potential
curtailment period, whichever occurs first.
E. Primary notification shall be through telecommunication
equipment provided by the Company. The Customer shall arrange
for telephone service, at the Customer's expense, dedicated
solely to such equipment. A secondary notification procedure
shall be established which is mutually agreeable to the
Customer and the Company.
F. Billing to the Customer shall include a monthly charge of $70
to cover communication and administrative costs.
III. DETERMINATION OF PAYMENT
A. Payment to the Customer will be applicable for the billing
months of December through March and June through September.
Payment will not depend upon requested curtailment{s} or
compliance. Payment may be made in the form of a deduction
from billing to the Customer. For each billing month where
payment is applicable, the Company shall determine the
curtailable Load defined as kW. minus kW2 where kW. is the
{Continued}
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
-This Filing Effective 05-01-90
. virginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP125a.man-3
Attachment F
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL
SCHEDULE CSCM
CURTAILABLE SERVICE
III. DETERMINATION OF PAYMENT (Continued)
average demand over all potential curtailment periods of the
current billing month, excluding days of curtailment, and kW.
is the applicable Summer/Winter Firm Demand.
B. When a payment is applicable, the Customer will be paid $6.75
perkW of curtailable Load for the billing months of December
through March, and $12.00 per kW of curtailable Load for the
billing months of June through September. In the event that
the Summer Firm Demand is increased during the current Summer
season, the Customer shall reimburse the Company for
overpayments beginning with the most recent June billing
month. In the event that the Winter Firm Demand is increased
during the current winter season, the Customer shall reimburse
the Company for overpayments beginning with the most recent
December billing month.
IV. BILLING FOR FAILURE TO CURTAIL
The Company shall determine the highest average kW measured in any
30-minute interval of each curtailment period. For each
curtailment period during the Summer, the Customer shall be billed
$48 times any demand in excess of the Summer Firm Demand. For
each curtailment period during the Winter, the Customer shall be
billed $27 times any demand in excess of the winter Firm Demand.
Each season the Customer may request by letter that one period of
Company requested curtailment be ignored in the determination of
curtailment compliance. Such request shall be made within 10 days
of the specific Company requested curtailment.
V. TERM OF CONTRACT
The term of contract under this schedule shall be such as may be
mutually agreed upon, but for not less than one year.
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
This Filing Effective 05-01-90
virginia Electric and Power Company
3KWS126a.man-1
Attachment G
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL
SCHEDULE SGCM
STANDBY GENERATOR
I. APPLICABILITY
This schedule is applicable on a voluntary basis to any account
(Customer) who: (1) purchases electricity in accordance with any
applicable rate schedule, and (2) has standby generation capacity
of 100 kW or greater which is not normally operated in parallel
with the Company. This schedule is not applicable to customers
who elect Schedule CSCM. Under this schedule the Customer agrees
to transfer load normally served by the Company to his standby
generation upon Company request. Standby generation is defined
as generation installed by the Customer to supply electricity
during those times when service is not available from the
Company. Revisions to this schedule may be made in accordance
with the provisions in the Agreement For the Purchase of Electric
Service by Municipalities and Counties.
II. NOTIFICATION, GENERATION PROVISIONS, AND MONTHLY BILLING TO THE
CUSTOMER
A. Company-owned facilities will be required to meter the output
of the Customer's generator. Billing to the Customer shall
include a monthly charge of $140 to cover costs associated
with metering facilities, meter reading and processing,
communication, and administration.
B. operation may be requested by the Company only from May 16
through September 30 (Summer) and from December 1 through
March 31 (Winter). During the Summer, the potential operation
period is from 2 p.m. to 9 p.m. During the Winter, the
potential operation period is from 6 a.m. to 11 a.m., or from
5 p.m. to 10 p.m. Company requested operations are limited to
no more than one per day. For each calendar year, the total
number of operation requests shall be limited to 13 during the
winter and 19 during the Summer.
C. When notification of requested operation is provided at a time
other than during a potential operation period, the Customer
shall begin operation within two hours, or at the beginning of
the next potential operation period, whichever occurs later.
When notification of requested operation is provided by the
Company during a potential operation period, the Customer
shall begin operation within two hours of receiving
notification. The Customer shall continue operation until
notification by the Company, or until the end of the potential
operation period, whichever occurs first.
(Continued)
Electric - Virginia
Municipal-County
This Filing Effective 05-01-90
Virginia Electric and Power Company
3KWS126a.man-2
Attachment G
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL
SCHEDULE SGCM
STANDBY GENERATOR
II. NOTIFICATION, GENERATION PROVISIONS, AND MONTHLY BILLING TO THE
CUSTOMER (Continued)
D. Primary notification shall be through telecommunication
equipment provided by the Company. The Customer shall arrange
for telephone service, at the Customer's expense, dedicated
solely to such equipment. A secondary notification procedure
shall be established which is mutually agreeable to the
Customer and the Company.
III. DETERMINATION OF PAYMENT TO CUSTOMER
A. For each season the Customer shall contract for the amount of
load the standby generation will maintain upon Company
requested operation. This amount shall be based on the kW
output of the Customer's standby generator, and shall be
referred to as the capacity level (CL). Summer CL need not
equal Winter CL. Both shall be mutually agreeable to the
Customer and the Company, but no greater than the load
connected to the Customer's generation.
B. Payment to the Customer may be made in the form of a deduction
from billing to the Customer. During billing months where
operation of standby generation is not requested by the
Company, the customer shall be paid based on the applicable
contracted CL. For all other billing months the Customer
shall be paid based on the Average Capacity Generated during
Company requests. Average Capacity Generated is defined as
the total energy generated during period(s) of Company
requested operation during the current billing month, divided
by the hours of requested operation during the current billing
month. Each season the Customer may request by letter that
one period of Company requested operation be ignored in the
determination of the Average Capacity Generated. Such request
shall be made within 10 days of the specific Company requested
operation. For the billing months of November through April,
the Customer shall be paid $4.50 per kW. For the billing
months of May through October, the Customer shall be paid
$8.00 per kW.
(Continued)
Electric - Virginia
Municipal-County
This Filing Effective 05-01-90
Virginia Electric and Power Company
3KWS126a.man-3
Attachment G
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL
SCHEDULE SGCM
STANDBY GENERATOR
III. DETERMINATION OF PAYMENT TO CUSTOMER (Continued)
C. When the Average Capacity Generated for any billing month is
less than the applicable contracted CL, the applicable
contracted CL shall be reduced to the Average Capacity
Generated. In the event that contract Summer CL is reduced
prior to September 30, the Customer shall reimburse the
Company for overpayments during prior billing months where
operation was not requested, beginning with the most recent
May billing month. In the event that contract winter CL is
reduced prior to March 31, the Customer shall reimburse the
Company for overpayments during prior billing months where
operation was not requested, beginning with the most recent
November billing month. Contract Summer CL may be increased
by mutual agreement subsequent to the October billing month.
Contract winter CL may be increased by mutual agreement
subsequent to the April billing month.
IV. METERING AND FACILITY INSPECTION
All facilities necessary to meter the Customer's standby
generation shall be installed and maintained according to Company
specifications. All electrical facilities on the line side of the
metering installation shall be subject to inspection by the
Company's authorized representative at all reasonable times.
V. METER READING, BILLING, AND PAYMENT
Meters may be read monthly. Billing and payment will be made
concurrent with billing under the applicable rate schedule for
the purchase of electricity.
VI. TERM OF CONTRACT
The term of contract under this schedule shall be such as may be
mutually agreed upon, but for not less than one year.
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
This Filing Effective 05-01-90
Attachment H
SCHEDULE 150
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
ROADWAY, DIRECTIONAL AND AREA LIGHTING SERVICE
HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR
I. APPLICABILITY
service on this schedule is available to any municipality or county,
or any board, agency or authority thereof for roadway, directional and area
lighting service.
II. MONTHLY RATE
A. Roadway, Directional and Area Lighting Service
1. Type 1. Fixtures consisting of the following types: open
vertical, enclosed, small colonial, traditional colonial,
contemporary, sphere, and the rectangular.
Approximate Input Monthly Rate Per unit Per Month
Lumens Wattaqe kWh Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
5,000 HPSV 82 30 $ 8.18 $ 8.40
8,000 HPSV 120 40 $ 9.00 $ 9.24
14,000 HPSV 202 70 $10.94 $11.22
23,000 HPSV 315 105 $15.28 $15.66
42,000 HPSV 490 160 $23.16 $23.74
127,000 HPSV 1,130 380 $35.84 $36.66
2. Type 2. Fixtures consisting of the following types: ultra,
acorn and the decorative colonial.
Rate Per unit Per Month
Approx. Monthly First unit Each Additional
Lumens ~ kWh Per Pole Unit on Same Pole
Effective Effective
7-1-91 1-1-92 7-1-93 7-1-91 thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
5,000 HPSV 30 $23.12 $17.90 $18.39 $ 8.54 $ 8.77
8,000 HPSV 40 $23.86 $18.55 $19.06 $ 9.31 $ 9.55
14,000 HPSV 70 $25.21 $20.27 $20.81 $11. 08 $11. 36
23,000 HPSV 105 $28.53 $24'.24 $24.88 $14.42 $14.78
42,000 HPSV 160 $32.35 $30.41 $31. 19 $18.23 $18.67
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
Attachment H
SCHEDULE 150
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
ROADWAY, DIRECTIONAL AND AREA LIGHTING SERVICE
HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR
(Continued)
3. Directional Lighting service
Rate Per Unit Per Month
7-1-91
First unit
Per Pole
Effective
Thru 6-30-93
$24.27
$36.75
7-1-93 7-1-91
$24.88
$37.60
Each Additional
unit on Same Pole
Effective
Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
$15.63 $15.98
$27.30 $27.88
Approx.
Lumens ~
Monthly
kWh
42,000 HPSV
127,000 HPSV
160
380
4. Expressway Specifically designed luminaires which allow
greater spacing and up to 40 foot setbacks from the outside lane
edge of highways.
Rate Per Unit Per Month
7-1-91
First Unit
Per Pole
Effective
Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
$38.52 $39.56
$41.75 $42.86
Each Additional
Unit on Same Pole
Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
$23.39 $24.00
$26.63 $27.31
Approx.
Lumens ~
Monthly
kWh
23,000 HPSV
42,000 HPSV
105
160
5. Charge for Fluted Poles and for Aluminum Bridge Poles Meeting
Requirements of Schedule 152
Some of the luminaires available under II.A.1. and 2. above
are known as pole top luminaires to be installed on either a
concrete pole or a tapered textured fiberglass pole. Should
the Customer want a 10 to 14 foot fluted decorative pole in
lieu of the concrete or tapered textured fiberglass pole, the
charge per month will be the appropriate charge from II.A.1.
or 2. above plus the appropriate charge below. For luminaires
installed on bridge poles meeting the requirements of Schedule
152, the charge per month will be the appropriate charge from
II.A.1 above plus item i. below.
i.
aluminum fluted decorative pole or bridge pole $ 18.66
ii.
fiberglass fluted decorative pole $7A46
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
Attachment H
SCHEDULE 150
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
ROADWAY, DIRECTIONAL AND AREA LIGHTING SERVICE
HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR
(Continued)
The sum of the appropriate pole charges in this paragraph and
the charges from II.A.1. or 2. above shall be used to
determine the excess of four years' revenue.
6. Availability of Additional Fixtures
As additional fixtures become available for inclusion in the
Company's system, the Company will endeavor to assign such
fixtures an appropriate rate under this Schedule.
B. Fuel Adjustment Charge
Each kilowatthour used is subject to adjustment for changes in fuel
costs in accordance with the Fuel Adjustment Clause. Kilowatthours
used shall be the "Monthly kWh" shown above for each lamp.
C. Minimum Charge
The monthly minimum charge shall be the rate specified in
section II. A. above. The minimum charge shall be increased by any
applicable fuel adjustment factor.
III. PAYMENTS
Bills are due and payable from the billing date as provided in
section VII of the Terms and Conditions of which this Schedule is a part.
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The complete installation is to be furnished, maintained and operated
by the Company and will remain the property of the Company. The type of
fixture and method of installation shall be in accordance with Company
standards. The Company will make either overhead or underground
installations in accordance with section III of the Terms and Conditions
of which this schedule is a part. Installations on buildings or structures
belonging to the Customer or to others will not be permitted.
The Customer shall report to the Company, as promptly as possible,
any lights that are out or not burning properly. The Company will, except
in storm or other unusual weather or operating conditions, endeavor to
replace or repair such lights within three working days after such report
for overhead installations and within five working days for underground
installations. If the streetlight has not been repaired within eleven
calendar days regardless of the reason, the Company will automatically
adjust the billing. The amount of any refund or credit for such lights
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
Attachment H
SCHEDULE 150
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
ROADWAY, DIRECTIONAL AND AREA LIGHTING SERVICE
HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR
(continued)
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS (Continued)
shall be prorated for the days of outage following the first report to the
Company. The above paragraph will not be applicable to outages caused by
extraordinary circumstances requiring abnormal repairs.
Upon request, the Company will provide a report to the Customer on
a monthly basis of all street light outages reported to the Company which
occurred during the month. The report shall state (a) the location of the
street light, (b) the lumen size (c) type of lamp (MV or HPSV) (d) type of
fixture (Type 1 or Type 2), (e) the date the outage was reported, (f)
when the outage was repaired, and (g) the cause of the problem.
V. AVAILABILITY OF SCHEDULE
This schedule will be available on and after July 1, 1991.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
Attachment I
SCHEDULE 151
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
ROADWAY, DIRECTIONAL AND AREA LIGHTING SERVICE
INCANDESCENT, MERCURY VAPOR, AND URBANLITES
CLOSED TO NEW INSTALLATIONS REQUESTED
AFTER JANUARY 1, 1986 EXCEPT AS OUTLINED HEREIN
I. APPLICABILITY
Service on this schedule for the incandescent, mercury vapor and
urbanlites lighting units listed below is available to any municipality or
county, or any board, agency or authority thereof for roadway, directional
and area lighting service for installations existing as of January 1, 1986
only. Other units listed below are available only as described in the next
paragraph.
Existing incandescent (until removed under the Company's incandescent
removal plan), mercury vapor or urbanli te units as listed below will
continue to be supplied at those locations being served as of January 1,
1986 at the rates set forth below. In the event such an existing unit is
discontinued at Customer's option, it shall not thereafter be available at
such location. No additional such units will be supplied, and in the event
any such other unit shall fail and cannot be made operative in the field,
at Customer's option the Company will, at Company's cost, after reasonable
notification to Customer, either (a) remove and not replace the defective
fixtures, or (b) replace the same with Company's high pressure sodium vapor
fixture of Customer's choice which will thereafter be billed at the
appropriate rate; except that a new mercury vapor unit will be installed
upon the Customer's request if it is to be within a block which already has
existing mercury vapor units or adjacent to an area which has existing
mercury vapor units. However, if the existing area served by mercury vapor
is separated from the unlighted area by an identifiable visual break, such
as a major thoroughfare, a major intersection, a body of water, or a grove
of trees, etc., no mercury vapor units will be installed in the unlighted
area. In all other instances where such visual break is not readily
identifiable, the Customer will make the determination as to whether
mercury vapor units are to be installed but in all instances, the Customer
will make every effort to install high pressure sodium vapor units.
(Continued)
Electric - virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
Attachment I
SCHEDULE 151
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
ROADWAY, DIRECTIONAL AND AREA LIGHTING SERVICE
INCANDESCENT, MERCURY VAPOR, AND URBANLITES
CLOSED TO NEW INSTALLATIONS REQUESTED
AFTER JANUARY 1, 1986 EXCEPT AS OUTLINED HEREIN
(continued)
II. MONTHLY RATE
A. Roadway, Directional and Area Lighting Service
1. Mercury Vapor (MV)
Approximate Input Monthly Rate Per unit
Lumens Wattaqe kWh Per Month
Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
3,300 MV 125 40 $ 8.47 $ 8.69
7,000 MV 208 70 $10.19 $10.44
11,000 MV 294 100 $13.36 $13.69
20,000 MV 452 150 $19.23 $19.70
33,000 MV 765 250 $30.28 $31.02
53,000 MV 1,080 360 $39.23 $40.16
2. Urbanlites --- Rectangular shaped luminaires which provide sharp
cutoff light patterns along with decorative, environmental
qualities, applicable to Roadway and Area Lighting Service.
Approximate Input Monthly Rate Per unit
Lumens Wattaqe kWh Per Month
Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
20,000 MV 452 150 $29.40 $30.16
14,000 HPSV 202 70 $22.04 $22.63
23,000 HPSV 315 105 $23.97 $24.60
3. Directional Lighting Service
Rate Per Unit Per Month
Approx. Monthly First unit Each Additional unit
Lumens kWh Per Pole On Same Pole
Effective Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93 7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
20,000 MV 150 $20.82 $21. 34 $15.69 $16.06
53,000 MV 360 $37.83 $38.72 $27.78 $28.39
(Continued)
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
Attachment I
SCHEDULE 151
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
ROADWAY, DIRECTIONAL AND AREA LIGHTING SERVICE
INCANDESCENT, MERCURY VAPOR, AND URBANLITES
CLOSED TO NEW INSTALLATIONS REQUESTED
AFTER JANUARY 1, 1986 EXCEPT AS OUTLINED HEREIN
(continued)
4. Incandescent (INC. ) units
Approximate Monthly Rate Per unit
Lumens kWh Per Month
Effective
7-1-91 Thru 6-30-93 7-1-93
2,500 INC. 70 $10.15 $10.40
4,000 INC. 110 $12.31 $12.60
6,000 INC. 150 $12.42 $12.70
10,000 INC. 230 $16.18 $16.52
B. Fuel Adjustment Charge
Each kilowatthour used is subject to adjustment for changes in
fuel costs in accordance with the Fuel Adjustment Clause.
Kilowatthours used shall be the "Monthly kWh" shown above for
each lamp.
C. Minimum Charge
The monthly minimum charge shall be the rate specified in
section II.A. above. The minimum charge shall be increased by
any positive applicable fuel adjustment factor.
III. PAYMENTS
Bills are due and payable from the billing date as provided in
section VII of the Terms and Conditions of which this Schedule is a part.
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The complete installation is to be furnished, maintained and
operated by the Company and will remain the property of the Company. The
type of fixture and method of installation shall be in accordance with
Company standards. The Company will make either overhead or underground
installations in accordance with section III of the Terms and Conditions
of which this schedule is a part. Installations on buildings or structures
belonging to the Customer or to others will not be permitted.
(Continued)
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
.
Attachment I
SCHEDULE 151
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
ROADWAY, DIRECTIONAL AND AREA LIGHTING SERVICE
INCANDESCENT, MERCURY VAPOR, AND URBANLITES
CLOSED TO NEW INSTALLATIONS REQUESTED
AFTER JANUARY 1, 1986 EXCEPT AS OUTLINED HEREIN
(Continued)
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS (Continued)
The Customer shall report to the Company, as promptly as possible, any
lights that are out or not burning properly. The Company will, except in
storm or other unusual weather or operating conditions, endeavor to replace
or repair such lights within three working days after such report for
overhead installations and within five working days for underground
installations. If the street light has not been repaired within eleven
calendar days regardless of the reason, the Company will automatically
adjust the billing period. The amount of any refund or credit for such
lights shall be prorated for the days of outage following the first report
to the Company. The above paragraph will not be applicable to outages
caused by extraordinary circumstances requiring abnormal repairs.
Upon request, the Company will provide a report to the Customer
on a monthly basis of all street light outages reported to the Company
which occurred during the month. The report shall state (a) the location
of the street light, (b) the lumen size (c) type of lamp (MV or HPSV) (d)
type of fixture (e) the date the outage was reported, (f) when the outage
was repaired, and (g) the cause of the problem.
V. AVAILABILITY OF SCHEDULE
This schedule will be available on and after July 1, 1991.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
Attachment J
SCHEDULE 152
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES ON BRIDGES AND OVERPASSES
The Company will install, own, and maintain its standard design
aluminum bridge poles, fixtures, arms, shock pads, dampers, photo controls,
lamps, wire, cable and associated connectors provided:
A. Distance from water level to bridge deck does not exceed 115 -
feet.
B. Length of arm does not exceed eight feet.
C. Luminarie shall be 8,000, 14,000, 23,000 or 42,000 lumen high
pressure sodium vapor enclosed horizontal fixture.
The Customer will:
1. Install, maintain, and operate all fixed items including,
but not limited to, conduit, handholes, pole foundations,
and anchor bolts to company specifications.
2. At the time of installation, pays the excess cost, if any,
to the extent such installation costs exceeds four times
the estimated annual revenue, excluding the fuel adjustment
clause factor.
3. Pay the monthly rate shown for bridge and overpass
lighting.
4. Supply necessary traffic control when maintenance is
required on the facilities supplied by the Company if
special safety equipment not used elsewhere on the Virginia
Power system is required and the safety of Virginia Power
employees becomes at risk.
5. Agree to continue to pay the monthly charge for a period of
five years from the date of the original installation and
continuing thereafter until ninety days written notice of
termination is given by either party, notwithstanding the
fact that the Agreement to which this provision is a part
will terminate prior to such date.
D. Repair of fixtures will be performed in the same manner and
same time period as specified in Section IV of the Street
Lighting Schedules. In such case, the schedule of repair will
be coordinated with the Customer.
E. The monthly charges shall be as described in Schedule 150 and
include the additional charge for bridge, poles stated in
paragraph II.A.5.i of that schedule.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
t
Attachment It
SCHEDULE 153
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
STREET LIGHTING - SPECIAL FIXTURES
If requested by Customer, the Company shall install special
street lighting fixtures and/or poles that are of standard
manufacture (i.e., manufacturer's inventory items) and do not
require extraordinary handling or maintenance as follows:
1. The Customer shall provide all fixed items; such as,
conduit, hand holes, manholes, and pole bases, etc. The
Customer will pay the Excess of Four Years' Revenue of a
normal street lighting installation plus the tax effect
recovery factor, if applicable, plus a facilities charge
pursuant to Schedule B on the difference between a normal
and the special streetlighting installation.
2. A perpetual inventory of these special
fixtures/poles/replacement parts as may be required will be
provided by the Customer to consist of not less than 10% of
the installed fixtures/poles. Storage for the inventory
shall be provided by the Customer.
3. If the fixtures/poles prove to require an excessive amount
of maintenance, the Company and Customer will agree upon a
modified facility charge rate.
4. Customer agrees to have an initial term of five years for
installation of the fixtures/poles continuing thereafter
until 90 days written notice of termination is given.
5. Should the Customer
fixtures/poles such
Customer.
request a change in
change shall be paid
the
for
special
by the
6. Customer shall pay the Company its cost of purchasing any
special fixtures, poles or parts for replacement for
existing installations as well as for repair. Such cost
shall be the greater of the invoice cost plus 10 % or the
invoice cost plus $50.00.
(Continued)
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
Attachment It
SCHEDULE 153
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
STREET LIGHTING - SPECIAL FIXTURES
(Continued)
7. Maintenance and servicing of these special fixtures/poles
shall be at a standard not less than that furnished to
other fixtures provided by the Company to the Customer and
as specified in Section IV, Terms and Conditions of the
street Lighting Schedules.
8. Customer agrees that the special fixtures/poles to be
requested will meet the engineering and safety requirements
of the Company as follows:
a. meet ANSI standards
b. be of utility quality or better
c. be capable of being maintained wi thin Company
safety standards
d. accept the Company's high pressure sodium vapor
lamp (mogul base)
e. meet Company specifications
9. The rate included in any special streetlighting Agreements
existing as of the effective date of this Agreement shall
be restated to account for fuel in the same manner as other
rates in this Agreement and increased by the same
percentage as agreed to for overall electric service
generally.
10. In the event any special lighting fixture and/or pole
originally supplied by the Customer under this Schedule, or
equivalent schedule under a previous Agreement, becomes a
standard lighting fixture and/or pole (referred to
collectively as "installation") for which the Company has
provided an applicable rate, the Company will serve such
installation under the applicable rate. In such event, the
Company will purchase from the Customer all repair parts,
poles and luminaires purchased by the Customer for
inventory and/or repair which the Customer was required by
the Company to have in inventory as provided in paragraph
2 of this Schedule. The Company shall purchase such
materials from the Customer at the Company's existing rate
for similar materials.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
" L_ ..
Attachment L
SCHEDULE 154
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
SERVICE TO CUSTOMER-OWNED
STREET, AREA AND OTHER OUTDOOR LIGHTING FACILITIES
OPERATED ONLY DURING NIGHT-TIME HOURS
I. APPLICABILITY
This schedule may be selected by any municipality or county
or any board, agency or authority thereof, for the supply of
alternating current electricity to customer installed,
owned, and maintained street, area or other outdoor lighting
facilities which meet the Terms and Conditions of this
schedule. Electricity supplied under this schedule shall
not be used for other purposes.
II. MONTHLY RATE
A. Basic CUstomer Charge
1. For metered service, the Basic CUstomer Charge is
$5.50.
2. For unmetered service, the Basic Customer Charge
is $2.00 per delivery point.
B. Plus Energy Charge
Rate per kWh:
Effective
7-1-91 thru 6-30-93
5.130jt
7-1-93
5.361jt
C. For the purposes of billing unmetered service,
kilowatthours shall be estimated based upon connected
load multiplied by hours usage.
D. Each kilowatthour used is subject to adjustment for
changes in fuel costs in accordance with the Fuel
Adjustment Clause attached hereto.
III. PAYMENTS
Bills are due and payable from the billing date as provided
in section VII of the Terms and Conditions of which this
schedule is a part.
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
.. _L. _
Attachment L
SCHEDULE 154
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
SERVICE TO CUSTOMER-oWNED
STREET, AREA AND OTHER OUTDOOR LIGHTING FACILITIES
OPERATED ONLY DURING NIGHT-TIME HOURS
(Continued)
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A. Metered service shall be supplied to one delivery
point. When metered service is provided, the customer
will install, own and maintain an appropriate approved
structure to support the Company's metering facilities.
B. Unmetered service may be supplied to one or more
delivery points when mutually agreed by the Company and
the CUstomer. When unmetered service is provided, the
Company will connect to the Customer' s conductors at
the base of the lighting pole in a suitable space which
meets the Company's specifications and approval. For
electric service to underpass lighting and illuminated
information signs, the location of the delivery point
shall be as mutually agreed by the Company and the
CUstomer.
C. The Customer's lighting shall be switched by a
photoelectric control that fails in the off position.
Photoelectric controls shall be designed to energize
the luminaire when the ambient light is 1.5
footcandles (a tolerance of to.3 footcandles is
allowed). The control shall be designed so that, once
energized, the luminaire is de-energized when the
ambient light is below 2.5 footcandles. The control
shall be located such that it is not blocked from the
natural ambient light.
D. The Company shall extend facilities to the delivery
point(s) upon payment of the Excess of Four Years'
Revenue.
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
. '- .
Attachment M
SCHEDULE A
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
TEMPORARY SERVICE CHARGE
Upon request of the Customer, temporary service shall be
supplied under the following conditions:
A. Advance payment to the Company will not be required prior
to connection of the service. A Temporary Service Charge
which, except as modified by Paragraphs B. and C., shall be
the estimated net cost (including all applicable overhead
costs) of installing and removing the service facilities
furnished by the Company both on and off the Customer's
premises, but in no case shall such charge be less than
$16.56.
B. Where temporary service is furnished at a permanent service
location, the Temporary Service Charge will be the net cost
to the Company, including overhead costs, which is in
excess of the estimated cost of furnishing the permanent
service.
C. When the construction necessary to install the required
service is a service drop (single phase, 3 wire overhead)
or underground service from an existing secondary, or from
an existing padmounted transformer, the Customer may elect
to pay, in lieu of the charges described in Paragraph A. or
B., the currently effective flat charge as approved by the
Virginia State corporation Commission, provided that the
temporary service meets the required specifications.
However, if the Customer requests the Company to prepare an
estimate under either Paragraph A. or B., above, then the
flat charge under this Paragraph C. will not be applicable.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
.. L- 'J
Attachment N
SCHEDULE B
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
EXCESS FACILITIES SERVICE RATE
When the Customer is provided excess of normal facilities in
accordance with section XI of the Terms and Condi tions of which this
schedule is a part, the Customer will pay a facilities charge as follows:
A. The Customer agrees to pay the Company a Monthly Facilities
Charge equal to 1.75% of the estimated new installed cost
of all facilities provided by the Company in addition to
those facilities which the Company would normally provide
to supply electricity to the Customer at one delivery
point. The Monthly Facilities Charge will be in addition
to the charge for electricity in accordance with the
applicable rate schedule.
B. In lieu of the charge specified in Paragraph A. above, the
Customer agrees to pay, (a) a one-time Facilities Charge
equal to the estimated new installed cost of all facilities
provided by the Company in addition to those the Company
would normally provide multiplied by a tax effect recovery
factor of 1.29, plus (b) a Monthly Facilities Charge equal
to 0.75% of said cost.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
. L .
Attachment 0
SCHEDULE C
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
SCHEDULE OF
MISCELLANEOUS AND STANDBY CHARGES
APPLICABLE TO THE UNITS OF
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Tvoe of Charqe
Amount of Charqe
1. Connection $15.00 per instance
2. Minimum temporary service charge $16.56 per instance
3. Tax effect recovery factor multiplier
applicable to monies collected and
classified as contributions in aid
of construction as of the 1.29
effective date of the agreement.
This factor subject to change
concurrent with any change authorized
for other retail customers in Virginia.
4. Where parallel or standby service is supplied
under Schedule 130 or 131, the charges
shall be as provided therein. Where such service
is supplied under another rate schedule, the
monthly charge for parallel or standby
operation service shall be the sum of a.,
and b. below:
a.
The
(1)
greater of: 07-01-91 thru 06-30-93
Contract demand per kw
(as determined in Section XII
of Agreement) $3.69
07-01-93
$3.79
or
(2) Monthly kWh @
Municipal
County
$3.428C
$4.381C
3.525C
4.506C
plus
b. Monthly kWh x (the rate per kWh currently effective
in the applicable rate schedule)
(rate per kWh listed in 4a.2. above)
+ (monthly fuel adjustment factor)
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
Attachment P
SCHEDULE D
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
MERCURY VAPOR TO HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR
CONVERSION CHARGES
Credit
County/Municipality
In Area Scheduled
Virqinia Power
Cost per Fixture
for Relampinq* Countv/Municioalitv
R/P 3300 lumen MERC $170.00
w/5000 lumen HPSV
R/P 3300 lumen MERC $170.00
w/8000 lumen HPSV
R/P 3300 lumen MERC $185.00
w/14000 lumen HPSV
R/P 3300 lumen MERC $225.00
w/23,000 lumen HPSV
R/P 7000 lumen MERC $185.00
W/8000 lumen HPSV
R/P 7000 lumen MERC $185.00
w/14000 lumen HPSV
RIP 7000 lumen MERC $230.00
W/23000 lumen HPSV
R/P 11000 lumen MERC $185.00
w/8000 lumen HPSV
RIP 11000 lumen MERC $185.00
w/14000 lumen HPSV
RIP 11000 lumen MERC $230.00
w/23000 lumen HPSV
RIP 20000 lumen MERC $220.00
w/14000 lumen HPSV
R/P 20000 lumen MERC $220.00
W/23000 lumen HPSV
R/P 33000 lumen MERC $195.00
W/14000 lumen HPSV
$30.00 $140.00
$30.00 $140.00
$30.00 $155.00
$30.00 $195.00
$30.00 $155.00
$30.00 $155.00
$30.00 $200.00
$30.00 $155.00
$30.00 $155.00
$30.00 $200.00
$30.00 $190.00
$30.00 $190.00
$30.00 $165.00
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
...
Attachment P
SCHEDULE D
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
MERCURY VAPOR TO HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR
CONVERSION CHARGES
Credit
County/Municipality
In Area Scheduled
Cost per Fixture
Virqinia Power for Relamoinq*
Countv/Municioalitv
RIP 33000 lumen MERC
w/42000 lumen HPSV
$190.00
$30.00
$160.00
RIP 53000 lumen MERC
w/42000 lumen HPSV
$190.00
$30.00
$160.00
The Company will allow the greater of the credit indicated or net
additional annual revenue.
* TERF to be added based on net capital for each job.
* In areas not scheduled for relamping, but requested by Customer to
convert from MV to HPSV, credit will be $18.00 per fixture.
1. Upon request Virginia Power will provide the customer with a
schedule of mercury vapor lights to be cleaned and relamped in
the upcoming year, and on an annual basis the location where
such cleaning and relamping has taken place.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120-a.man
Attachment Q
SCHEDULE E
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
STREET LIGHTING PATROL SERVICE
Upon request by the Customer, the Company will furnish to Customer
a patrolling service of one or more units consisting of a motor vehicle and
operator (who shall be an employee of Company) to patrol the streets,
roadways, alleys and other accessible public areas within the Customer's
jurisdictional limits, as designated by Customer, and report street lights
furnished by Company which are not in proper operating condition. The
charge for such service shall be at the rate of $33.00 per hour for each
patrolling unit furnished. Such service shall be for such hours and days
of the week as agreed upon by the Company and Customer. In the event such
patrolling service is furnished hereunder, each patrol shall give prompt
notice of all such lights not properly operating to Company and to Customer
(with reasonable identification thereof) and such notice shall satisfy all
notice requirements in Paragraph IV of all Street Lighting Schedules
included in this Agreement. Such patrol rate is subject to adjustment for
increased costs by the Company at the beginning of each succeeding year of
this Agreement.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
r- .~
Attachment R
RIDER A
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
FUEL ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE
When the Customer's fuel cost per kilowatthour sold during the
three months ended with the second month preceding a billing month is above
or below 1.756C per kilowatthour, including line loss, then this fuel
adjustment clause becomes applicable and a fuel adjustment factor shall be
calculated with the formula shown below to the nearest thousandth of a cent
and applied as an adjustment to the Customer's bills for such billing
month:
(E +E )
F= 1 2 - B (T) (100)
s
Where:
F = Fuel adjustment factor in cents per kilowatthour
E 1 =
North Anna fuel expenses directly related to the Company's owned
portion of the plant, plus Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Buyback
expenses, experienced during the three months ended with the second
month preceding the billing month allocated at production level to
the Customer.
E2=
Total fuel expenses, less North Anna fuel expenses directly related
to the Company's owned portion of the plant and Old Dominion Electric
Cooperative Buyback expenses, experienced during the three months
ended with the second month preceding the billing month allocated at
production level to the Customer.
1. The system monthly fuel expenses allocated to the Customer are
determined as follows:
a. The cost of fossil fuels shall be those items initially
charged to account 151 and cleared to accounts 501, 518, and
547 on the basis of fuel used. In those instances where a
fuel stock account (151) is not maintained, e.g., gas for
combustion turbines, the amount shall be based on the cost
of fuel consumed and entered in account 547.
b. The cost of nuclear fuel shall be the amount contained in
account 518 except that if account 518 also contains any
expense for fossil fuel which has already been included in
the cost of fossil fuel, it shall be deducted from this
account.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WAC120a.man
. ... ~
Attachment R
RIDER A
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
FUEL ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE
(Continued)
c. Total energy and capacity costs associated with purchased and
interchanged power charged to account 555 shall be
recoverable as fuel costs.
d. The Company shall be permitted to adjust for system losses
associated with the Customer through methods consistent with
those approved for use in the Virginia Jurisdiction.
S = Total Customer kilowatthour sales during the three months ended with
the second month preceding the billing month.
B = Base cost of fuel per kWh sold adjusted for line loss.
T = Adjustment for state and local taxes measured by gross receipts:
100% divided by (100% minus applicable gross receipts tax rate).
Electric - Virginia
Municipal - County
Superseding Schedule Effective 07-01-88
This Schedule Effective 07-01-91
3WACl20a.man
~ - ~irginia Electric and Power Company
3GAP461.sch-1
Attachment S
RIDER J-CM
MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY
INTERRUPTIBLE ELECTRIC WATER HEATING SERVICE
RESIDENTIAL SERVICES
This Interruptible Electric Water Heating Service Rider will be available
only to individually metered residential services in those areas that the
Company has installed transmitting equipment that allow interruptions of the
electric water heater service.
This rider is applicable only if the residential service has an electrical
storage water heater in normal daily use that is subject to interruptions by the
Company. The type, design, and size of tank in the water heater, the size and
number of heater units and the method of its operation are subject to approval
by the Company.
The account (Customer) will be credited $4.00 per billing month for electric
water heating services subject to interruption. However, this credit will not
reduce billing below the minimum charges for Miscellaneous Light and Power or
All Electric Building Services.
Electric water heating service will be available for at least twelve hours
per day.
Rider J is not applicable to nonresidential services and may be revised in
accordance with the provisions in the Agreement For The Purchase Of Electric
Service By Municipalities and Counties.
Electric-Virginia
Municipal-County
This Rider Effective 03-01-89
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
FOR THE PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC SERVICE
BY MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES - VIRGINIA
I. REQUEST FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE
The Customer shall request and the Company shall supply
electric service at mutually agreed upon locations in addition to
those served as of the effective date of this Agreement. Requests
for connection of service or disconnection of service will be made
in writing.
II. NORMAL SERVICE
A. The Company will supply to the Customer 60 Hertz
electricity of the phase and Company standard nominal voltage
desired by the customer to each mutually agreed upon delivery
point, provided electricity of the phase and voltage desired by the
Customer is available generally in the area in which electricity is
desired. The characteristics at which electricity will be
furnished at each delivery point will be given in writing to the
Customer.
B. The Company shall not be required to supply electricity
unless the Customer's installation has been made in accordance with
the applicable provisions of the company's published Information
and Requirements for Electric Service.
C. The Company will make application for the permits and
acquire the easements necessary to build its supply facilities to
the property occupied by the Customer. If needed the Company may
request the reasonable assistance of the Customer in Obtaining
these permits and easements. The Customer will apply for, obtain,
and deliver to the Company all other permits or certificates
necessary to give the Company the right to connect its conductors
to the Customer's wiring, and access for all other proper purposes,
including an easement or permit from the land owner for the
Company's facilities. The Company shall accept a permit across
property owned by the Customer only if the Customer agrees that in
the event the permit is revoked, or terminated, or if removal is
otherwise desired by the Customer, the Customer agrees to pay the
cost of removing the Company's facilities and, if appropriate,
replacement. Upon the revocation or termination of the permit, the
Customer agrees to provide, if needed, a suitable substitute right-
of-way subject to the same terms provided for above to insure
continuity of electricity to the public.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
1 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
-in the event the Customer sells or conveys the property where the
Company facilities are there by permit, the customer shall provide
for a suitable easement for the Company's facilities.
The Company shall not be required to supply electricity until a
reasonable time has elapsed after the Company has obtained or
received all necessary permits, certificates, and easements. with
proper coordination between the Company and the Customer, service
will be supplied within ninety days from the later of:
1. Receipt of written authorization from the customer.
2. The date upon which all above documents are obtained.
D. Should any change or changes in the service connection
furnished the customer by the Company be made necessary by any
requirement of public authority, the entire cost of such changes on
the Customer's side of the delivery point shall be borne by the
customer. The delivery point shall be the point where the
Company's conductors for supplying electricity are connected to the
Customer's conductors for receiving electricity unless otherwise
mutually agreed.
E. Whenever service (other than temporary service) is
connected or reconnected for the Customer at any particular
location, a service connection charge in the amount specified in
Attachment 0, Miscellaneous and Standby Charges will be made.
However, this connection charge will not be made for unmetered
street and traffic control light connections.
III. ELECTRIC LINE EXTENSIONS
A. When the cost to construct or own any overhead line
extension, street lights, or other facility to provide the Customer
with electricity exceeds four times the additional annual revenue
to be received from the Customer, Company shall only be obligated
to construct such facilities if the customer pays the Company the
Excess of Four Years' Revenue. The additional annual revenue shall
be determined as the additional continuing annual revenue
reasonably anticipated by the Company from the facility being added
to the Company's system, excluding all revenue produced by the
"fuel adjustment factor" - Rider A, Municipal and County Fuel
Adjustment Clause. For purposes of this Agreement, the "Excess of
Four Years' Revenue" shall be defined as the amount by which the
estimated cost of installing the described facilities exceeds four
times the additional annual revenue so determined.
B. Existing master metered installations will continue
to be master metered, except that at the Customer's request, the
Company may provide in lieu thereof, individually metered service.
If the Customer requests individually metered servicet the Customer
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
2 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
- shall pay to the Company the Excess of Four Years' Revenue as
applied to the additional cost of any new facilities that may be
required plus the value of any excess facilities at the location
for which the customer has not previously paid. The location of
the new delivery points shall be determined by mutual agreement.
C. The Company will supply to the Customer new underground
service as provided herein. Payment for such new service is
established as follows:
1. New underground service for street lights and
traffic signals will be provided upon payment of the Excess of Four
Years' Revenue.
2. The Company will provide new underground service
in an "Underground Distribution Area" upon payment of the Excess of
the Four Years' Revenue. Provided, however, the Company shall not
be obligated to construct or own any electric underground line
extension beyond the property line of the Customer. An
"Underground Distribution Area" is an area within a major
metropolitan high load density center which has been designated by
the Company with concurrence of the Customer.
3. The Company will provide to the Customer new
underground service for all facilities other than those listed in
paragraphs C.1 and C.2 above, upon payment of (i) the estimated in
cost if any, between the underground and overhead facilities and
(ii) the Excess of Four Years' Revenue as determined for the
overhead facilities that would be used in lieu of underground
facilities.
When the Customer provides trenching and backfilling or
furnishes a meter pedestal approved by the Company or when the
costs of trenching and backfilling are shared by another utility,
the Company's charge for providing underground service will be
reduced by the average reduction in cost to the Company resulting
therefrom.
Within any development for which underground electric
service has been installed, only electric underground service will
be provided and it will be pursuant to this section III.C.
D. When the Customer requests the Company to convert
existing overhead facilities to underground, the Customer shall pay
to the Company (I) the total cost of such conversion less the cost,
if any, to upgrade the existing facilities to serve the proposed
load, and (2) the Excess of Four Years' Revenue, if any, that may
be applicable to upgrading the existing facilities. The total cost
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
3 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
-of conversion referenced in the foregoing sentence includes the
cost of removing the existing overhead facilities less salvage
value, plus the cost of the non-betterment portion of the
installation.
E. wi th respect to converting overhead facili ties to
underground facilities, in addition to the charges outlined in
paragraph D. above, the following provisions shall apply.
1. The Customer will not be required to pay for any
betterment. "Betterment" means the portions of the
project which are designed to improve other
portions of the Company's system or better the
existing service other than to reasonably assure
the reliability of the converted facilities. The
Customer may offer an alternate design for
consideration by the Company. When the charges to
the Customer are based on actual project cost, the
amounts determined as betterment and non-
betterment shall be proportional to those
determined under the estimated project cost.
2. A contract for constructing any aspect of an
underground conversion project by the Company
shall specify dates for completion of work as
mutually agreed upon by the Company and the
Customer. At the request of the Customer, any
such contract shall also include a liquidated
damages clause in an amount agreed to by the
parties to be paid by the Company if the
completion dates are not met. Such damages shall
not apply if a delay in construction is beyond the
control of the Company and its subcontractors.
The contract may also include incentives for early
completion as agreed to by the parties.
3. If requested by the Customer in writing prior to
the beginning of construction, the Company will
provide a fixed-price contract for the portion of
the project undertaken by the Company.
4. The Customer may, at its option, handle all "civil
construction" aspects of the project including the
opening and closing of the streets and the
installation of all necessary duct banks, provided
the duct bank is of such quality and design and is
installed in a manner satisfactory to the Company
including a final inspection of the duct bank upon
completion. If the Customer undertakes the civil
construction portion of the project, it will pay
the actual inspection charges to th~ Company for
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
4 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
reasonable inspection service provided by the
Company. The Customer or its contractors shall
submit to the Company all reports, drawings and
explanations in order to satisfy the company's
"as-built" record keeping requirements.
5. The Customer may, at its option, handle the
"electrical construction" aspects of a conversion
project including pulling the cable and
installation of transformers and switches provided
the Company would have otherwise handled such work
by outside contractors. If the customer handles
the electrical construction aspect of the project,
such work shall be performed pursuant to the
Company's written specifications, work rules, and
construction practices then in effect. The
customer shall use Company supplied material and
the work shall be performed by a contractor which
is on the list of contractors approved and
supplied by the Company at the time the contract
is entered into. If the customer undertakes the
electrical construction portion of the project, it
shall pay the actual inspection charges to the
Company for reasonable inspection service provided
by the Company. The Company inspector shall have
the right to work directly with the contractor and
correct or stop the contractor's work in order to
enforce the Company's written specifications, work
rules, and construction practices. If any such
action is taken, the Company shall notify the
Customer as soon as reasonably possible.
Notwithstanding the above, the Company shall make
all terminations and splices with its own
employees.
6. If the Customer handles the "electrical
construction" aspects of a project, the customer
or its contractors shall submit to the Company all
reports, drawings and explanations in order to
satisfy the Company's "as-built" record keeping
requirements. The Customer shall also be
responsible for: (I) the safekeeping of any
materials, equipment or supplies furnished the
Customer or their contractor by the Company
(hereafter "Materials"); (2) the return to the
company's storeroom of any unused Materials; (3)
the reconciliation of discrepancies between
Materials furnished by the Company, Materials used
in the work and Materials returned to the Company.
The Customer shall upon receipt of an invoice,
reimburse the Company at the Compa~y's cost for
Electric - virginia
Municipal and County
5 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
Material discrepancies or for damages to Materials
returned.
7. In the event the Customer performs some work as
allowed in this Paragraph E., the Customer's
contract with the contractor shall provide for any
necessary or unforeseen field changes due to
construction conditions andlor omissions by the
designer. Where design changes are required after
construction begins, such changes shall be
approved by the Company and any additional cost
borne by the Customer.
8. The Customer's contract with its contractors shall
require the contractors to defend, indemnify and
hold the Company harmless, as a valid third party
beneficiary of such contract, from and against all
liens, claims, losses, damages, costs and causes
of action for personal injury to or death of any
person or damage to any property in any manner
arising out of the contractor's performance of
services for the Customer unless attributable to
the sole negligence of the Company. The
Customer's contract with its contractors shall
also require that the contractors warrant to the
Company, as a valid third party beneficiary of
such contract, that its services, workmanship, and
all equipment and materials not furnished by the
Company are free from defects and that any
material or equipment not furnished by the Company
is merchantable and sui table for its intended
purpose. Customer's contract with its contractors
shall also require that such contractors shall
obtain, and maintain during the course of their
performance thereunder, insurance in such forms
and amounts as normally required by the Company
from its contractors. Customer shall, upon the
Company's request, provide the Company with
written assurances, satisfactory to the Company,
of its compliance with the provisions of this
subparagraph 8.
9. When the Customer handles any contracting work, in
no event shall the Company make payments to the
Customer for any portion of a credit (e.g., Four
Years Revenue, overhead line credit) the Customer
would otherwise have received if the Company had
handled the construction.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
6 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
F. with respect to new underground service in addition to
the charges outlined in Paragraph C above, the following provisions
shall apply:
1. The provision of paragraph E .1. above shall apply.
2. For new underground construction for new service
where the cost to the Customer, excluding a tax
effect recovery factor (TERF), is in excess of
$50,000, the Customer may perform that portion of
the project where the Company has plans to use an
outside contractor. In such event, the provisions
of paragraphs E.4 through E.9 above shall a~ply.
G. with respect to any projects requested by the Customer
for which it may be required to pay the Company under paragraphs A,
C, or D of this Section III, if requested by the Customer, the
Company shall provide the customer with the construction sketch of
the proposed design and a detailed estimate of the labor and
materials which will be used for the project. The detailed
estimate shall include a summary listing of the work included in
the project and an itemized estimate showing labor and material
costs as provided in the Company's Project Approval Report, Design
Summary and compatible unit Cost Estimate or equivalent. Cost
estimates provided by the Company shall be sufficiently detailed to
show separately the civil construction portion and the electrical
aspects of the project and any credit for salvage.
If requested by the Customer, the Company shall provide
a conceptual design of a proposed project involving converting
existing overhead services to underground which the Customer may
use for planning purposes to consider how or whether it will
continue with the project. The Company may charge the Customer for
any reasonable costs incurred in furnishing an estimate hereunder
regardless of whether or by whom a project is constructed.
H. Any payment by the Customer covering the (a) Excess of
Four Years' Revenue, (b) underground cost differential, (c) one-
time facilities charge payments or (d) any other payment classified
as a contribution in aid of construction on the Company's books,
shall be grossed up for the Company's payment of federal income
taxes by a tax effect recovery factor of 1.29, (this factor subject
to change concurrent with any change authorized for other retail
customers in Virginia) the product of which shall be paid by the
Customer. Such tax effect recovery factor (TERF) shall not apply to
temporary service, highway relocation projects, relocation projects
necessitated by the addition of sidewalks or storm drainage, and
conversion projects from overhead to underground in the event and
to the extent that contributions in aid of construction for such
services, relocations and conversions are not taxable. In
Electric - virginia
Municipal and County
7 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
-~ituations where the customer has constructed all or a portion of
the facilities which are transferred to the Company, the Customer
shall pay TERF on the lesser of:
1. The actual cost of the construction, including the
Company's capitalized administrative cost.
2. The Company's appraised value of the facility.
If TERF is paid in accordance with paragraph H.1., above, the
Customer shall provide invoices and other documentation sufficient
to establish to the Internal Revenue Service that the amount
determined in accordance with paragraph H.1. is the fair market
value of the facility. If the Internal Revenue Service later
concludes that the fair market value of the facility exceeds the
amount determined under paragraph H.1., the Customer shall pay TERF
on such excess amount.
I. Prior to the installation of any facilities under this
Section III, the Customer shall provide written authorization to
the Company of financial arrangements satisfactory to the Company.
Where the total charge to the Customer for work performed
under Section III is less than $50,000, billing will be due and
payable upon completion of the work. In those cases where the
completion of the work is extended for reasons beyond the control
of the Company in the exercise of reasonable diligence, progress
billing as outlined below will be implemented.
All projects where the estimated charge to the Customer is
$50,000 or greater, progress billings will be submitted
periodically but not more than once a month.
1. Progress bills will not be less than $1,000.00
2. Total progress billings will not exceed 90% of the
total estimated cost.
Where the Customer is charged based on the actual cost to
the Company rather than the estimated cost, if the final cost of
the project exceeds 115% of the estimated cost, at the Customer's
request, the Company shall provide a detailed explanation of the
increased cost. Additionally, the Customer may review all records
associated with the project at the Company's offices during normal
business hours. The Customer shall request in writing any such
additional billing information within 20 calendar days after the
bill date of the final invoice. The Company will make such
information available within a reasonable time after the Customer's
request. The Company shall thereafter establish the bill date
which date shall not be prior to the date on which the additional
information is made available.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
8 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
A late payment charge as described in section VII of these
terms and conditions will apply to all such charges, whether above
or below $50,000 or related to progress billings, if not paid as
specified therein. For actual cost projects where the actual cost
exceeds 15% above the estimated cost, the customer shall pay the
amount of the invoice up to 1.15 times the estimated cost
(estimated cost is the original estimated cost plus any revisions
thereto which have previously been agreed to in writing) as
provided in section VII hereof. Any amount in excess of 1.15 times
the estimated cost shall not be subject to a late payment charge
until 35 days after. the bill date which date shall not be
established until the additional information is made available as
provided in the previous paragraph. The monthly late payment
charge for the amount in excess of 1.15 times the estimated cost
shall be the excess amount times the sum of the prime rate, as
defined hereinafter, plus one and one-half percent divided by
twelve. As used in the previous sentence, "prime rate" shall mean
the prime rate specified on the last business day prior to the date
of the invoice in the Wall Street Journal as "the base rate on
corporate loans posted by at least 75% of the nation's 30 largest
banks."
IV. VOLTAGE VARIATION
A. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties hereto in
writing and attached hereto, the Company will endeavor to supply
voltages within the following limits:
The variation from nominal voltage to minimum voltage will
not exceed 7.5% of nominal voltage, and the variation from nominal
voltage to maximum voltage will not exceed 7.5% of nominal voltage.
Variations in voltage in excess of these specifications arising
from causes beyond the control of the Company shall not be
considered a violation hereof.
B. The following definitions apply to terms used above:
Nominal Voltage The reference level of service
voltage.
Maximum voltage The greatest 5-minute mean or
average voltage.
Minimum Voltage - The least 5-minute mean or average
voltage.
V. METER READING AND BILLING
A. Normally electricity will be furnished through one
delivery point and one set of metering apparatus.
B. Meters may be read in units of 10 kWh and bills
rendered accordingly.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
9 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
C. The metering equipment installed by the Company to
measure the electricity used by the Customer shall be tested by the
Company in accordance with the Company's standard meter testing
practices.
D. The Company will, without charge, make a test of the
accuracy of registration of the metering equipment upon the request
by the Customer, provided the Customer does not request such a test
more frequently than once in each 24 months. If more than one
request test is made in a 24-month period, the Customer will pay
all costs of making all tests other than the first test unless the
results of such additional request test indicate the accuracy of
the meter to be more than 2% fast or slow, in which case no charge
for said request test will be made.
E. When a meter is found to be no more than 2% fast or
slow, no adjustment will be made in the Company's bills. If the
meter is found to be more than 2% fast or slow because of incorrect
calibration the Company will rebill the Customer for the correct
amount as reasonably calculated for a period equal to one-half of
the time elapsed since the last previous test, but in no case for
a period in excess of twelve months. The percentage registration
of a meter will be calculated by the "weighted average" of light
load and full load, which is calculated by giving a value of 1 to
the light load and a value of 4 to the full load.
F. Whenever it is found that unmetered electricity is
being used as a result of tampering, the Customer will pay to the
Company an amount reasonably estimated by the Company with input
from the Customer to be sufficient to cover the electricity used
but not recorded by the meter and not previously paid for.
G. Whenever it is found that, for any reason other than
incorrect calibration or tampering, the metering apparatus has not
registered the true amount of electricity which has been used by
the customer, the electricity used during the entire period of
incorrect registration will be reasonably estimated, based upon
all known pertinent facts, and the amount of electricity so
estimated will be used in calculating the corrected bill. The
Company will rebill the Customer for the adjusted amount for a
period equal to one-half of the time elapsed since the last
previous test of the metering apparatus but in no case for a period
in excess of twelve months.
H. The Customer shall provide at a mutually agreeable
location suitable space for the installation of the necessary
metering apparatus which space shall normally be:
1. substantially free from vibration.
Electric - virginia
Municipal and County
10 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
2. An outside location unless otherwise approved by
the Company. For detached single family
residential structures a side location shall be
used where practicable.
3. Readily accessible and convenient for reading,
testing, and servicing.
4. Protected from damage by the elements or the
negligent or deliberate acts of persons.
I. The Company will furnish electricity to the Customer
for use only on the premises owned or leased by the Customer.
Electric service shall not be provided or allowed under this
Agreement to a separately metered privately owned residence or
business providing any type of service to the public, except where
such service is incidental to the operation of the Customer's
facility. The electricity furnished by the Company shall not be
submetered by the Customer for resale or assignment to another
entity in such a manner which allows the Customer or the other
entity to profit from such submetering not withstanding the
foregoing. The customer may, however, install sUbmetering
equipment in or at an apartment house or complex, office building,
or other public facility for each individual dwelling unit or
rental unit, or contractor facility whose purpose is to construct
a permanent facility for the Customer's use, or other public
facility (for use incidental to the operation of the Customer's
facility), as long as such submetering fairly allocates the cost of
each meter's or submeter's electrical consumption and electrical
demand charges on the basis of the charges made to the Customer.
The Customer shall not impose on the tenant any charges over and
above those charged to it by the Company, except that an additional
service charge not to exceed two dollars per month per dwelling
unit or rental unit may be collected to cover administrative costs
and billing. Further, the Customer shall maintain adequate records
regarding submetering and shall, upon request make such records
available for inspection by the tenant during reasonable business
hours. The provisions of this section shall not restrict the right
of the Customer to recover in periodic lease payments the tenant's
fair share of electricity costs attributable to common areas and
costs incurred by the Customer in establishing and maintaining the
submetering system.
VI. SELECTION OF SCHEDULE
Each Customer will select the particular rate schedule of those
applicable, under which the Customer desires to use electricity.
The Company may assist the Customer in making this selection but
responsibility for the selection rests exclusively with the
Customer. Such rate change will become effective for electricity
used on and after the meter reading immediately fol~owing written
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
11 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
-notice from the Customer of the selection of a new rate schedule.
VII. PAYMENTS
A. The supply of electricity by the Company is contingent
upon payment of all charges due from the Customer.
B. The Company will render bills to the Customer at
regular intervals. Bills are due and payable upon presentation and
become past due on the next bill date. The bill date is shown on
the bill and is the date on which the bill is prepared in the
Company's billing operations. In no event shall the time between
the date of billing preparation and the date by which payment must
be received in the Company's office in order to avoid a late
payment charge be less than 35 days. In the event payment shall
not be received within 35 days of the bill date, a late payment
charge of 1.5% per month will be imposed from the bill date to the
date of payment on all past due amounts. No late payment charge
shall be imposed if the Company fails to mail bills promptly after
the billing date. The Customer may designate its billing address.
C. Initial and final bills for street and traffic lighting
services shall be prorated based on the number of days of service
covered by such bill as compared to 30 days. The Company's bills
to the Customer will reflect the installation and removal of street
lights on a timely basis. The Company will exercise reasonable
diligence to reflect such street light changes on its bills within
45 days thereof.
D. Bills are payable at any office of the Company or to
any collector or collection agency duly authorized by the Company.
Payment shall be paid without regard to any counterclaim but shall
not affect the Customer's claim therefor.
E. Upon Customer request, the Company may agree to provide
a consolidation of bills service for certain accounts provided:
1. The Customer has a minimum of twenty five eligible
accounts billed to the same mailing address. Any
accounts for the Customer designated as large
general service accounts by the Company shall not
be eligible for this service.
2. The Customer agrees to pay the total amount billed
within 25 days of the billing date shown on the
Consolidation of Bills statement. If not paid
within the said 25 days, a late payment charge of
1.5% per month shall be made on any outstanding
balance.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
12 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
3. The Customer agrees to pay by check with the
appropriate Consolidation of Bills cashier coupon
enclosed with such oavrnent made onlv at:
Virginia Power
P. O. Box 26543
Richmond, Virginia 23290-00001
All other methods of payment are not acceptable.
The Company will not waive late payment charges
which may accrue due to improper attempts to make
timely payments.
4. A continuous course of improper payment or late
payment shall be construed as a failure to comply
with this portion of the Agreement and may subject
the Customer to termination of the Consolidation
of Bills service.
5. A letter supplement shall be entered into
incorporating other provisions of the service
including, but not limited to provisions for the
termination of the service and instructions for
initial and final bills for an individual account.
VIII. USE OF ELECTRICITY BY CUSTOMER
A. In order to protect the company's equipment,
electricity supplied to those locations served by the Company shall
not be used in conjunction with any other source of electricity
without previous written consent of the Company which consent shall
not be unreasonably withheld (see section XII. hereof and the
applicable rate schedule attached hereto), except that emergency
standby generation may be used without such written consent during
periods when the electricity supplied by the Company may fail or be
interrupted.
B. Because the Company's facilities used in supplying
electricity to the Customer have a definite limited capacity and
can be damaged by overloads, the Customer shall give adequate
notice to the Company and obtain the Company's written consent
before making any substantial change in the amount or use of load
connected to the Company's service.
C. The Customer shall not use electricity in any manner
which will be detrimental to the Company's supply of electricity to
other customers. The Company reserves the right, but shall have no
duty, to determine the suitability of apparatus or appliances to be
connected to its service by the Customer and to refuse to continue
or supply electricity if it shall reasonably determine that the
operation of such apparatus or appliances may be detr~mental to its
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
13 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
-general supply of electricity.
D. In the event the Customer installs equipment which
produces harmonics in excess of five percent Total Harmonic
Distortion (THD) and/or three percent of any single harmonic, the
Customer will provide and install, at his own expense, all
equipment necessary to reduce such harmonics to five percent or
less THD andlor to three percent or less of any single harmonic.
IX. RESPONSIBILITY OF CUSTOMER AND COMPANY
A. The Customer shall be responsible for keeping persons
and vehicles which it reasonably believes to be unauthorized away
from Company property installed on the Customer's premises.
B. The Customer.will make a reasonable effort to protect
the Company's property on the customer's premises, but shall not be
liable for the cost of repairs or damage to such property unless
same was caused by the willful misconduct or negligence of
Customer's employees or authorized agents.
C. Electricity is supplied by the Company and purchased
by the Customer upon the express condition that after it passes the
delivery point, it becomes the property of the Customer to be used
only as herein provided; and unless the negligence or willful
misconduct of the Company shall be a proximate cause thereof, the
Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any person or
property whatsoever, resulting directly or indirectly from the use,
misuse, or presence of the said electricity after it passes the
delivery point, or for any loss or damage resulting from the
presence, character, or condition of the wires or equipment of the
Customer or for the inspection or repair thereof.
D. The Company shall protect, maintain ,and repair the
Company's wiring and equipment. The Customer shall protect,
maintain and repair the Customer's wiring and equipment. Should
the Customer report trouble with the supply of electricity, the
Company will endeavor to respond with reasonable dispatch to such
call with the purpose only of correcting such trouble as may be in
the Company's equipment supplying the Customer. It is understood
that the Company has no responsibility to inspect equipment of the
Customer and will not normally make such an inspection. However,
if the trouble appears to be in the customer's wiring or
appliances, the Company's employees may, if requested by the
Customer, make such inspection of the Customer's wiring or
equipment as the Company's employees are prepared to make, but any
such inspection of the Customer's wiring or equipment by the
Company's employees is made with the express condition that the
Customer assumes the entire and sole risk, liability, and
responsibility for all acts, omissions, and negligence of the
Company's employees except the Company retains all r~sponsibility
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
14 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
-ror gross negligence of its employees.
E. The Company will follow its policy for cleaning and
relamping of Company owned street and outdoor lighting fixtures as
follows:
1. Mercury vapor fixtures will be cleaned and relamped
approximately every four years.
2. High pressure sodium vapor fixtures will be cleaned and
relamped approximately every six years.
3.
Upon request, at no charge
Company will provide to the
basis the location where such
has taken place.
to the Customer, the
Customer on an annual
cleaning and relamping
F. Upon wr i tten request, at no charge to the Customer, the
Company will provide to the Customer a map locating all street
lights in the Customer's territory. The Company may initiate a
field survey to locate and identify all street lights billed to the
Customer. Upon written request of the Customer, but not more
frequently than once every three years, the Company shall perform
such field survey at no charge to the Customer. When the survey is
conducted at the request of the Customer, the Customer will provide
a representative to accompany the Company surveyor. The Customer
will also be given the opportunity of having a representative
present during a Company initiated survey.
G. For any group of unmetered services, the Company may
require, not more frequently than once every three years, that the
Customer provide a qualified representative to accompany and assist
the Company in conducting a field survey of all such unmetered
services provided to the Customer.
X. RIGHT OF ACCESS
The Company shall have the right of access to the
Customer's premises at all reasonable times for the purpose of
reading meters of the Company, removing its property and for any
other proper purpose.
XI. EXCESS FACILITIES SERVICE
Whenever the Customer requests the Company to supply
electricity to a single premises as described in section XI.A.
below in a manner which requires the Company to supply equipment
and facilities in excess of those which the Company would normally
provide in section II. and III. and the Company finds it
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
15 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
- practicable, such excess equipment and facilities shall be provided
under the following conditions:
A. Electricity will be supplied through such excess
equipment and facilities only to a single premises consisting of
contiguous property whose surface is not divided by any dedicated
public street, road, highway, alley or by property not owned or
leased by the Customer.
B. The facilities supplied shall be of a kind and type of
transmission or distribution line or substation equipment normally
used by or acceptable to the Company and shall be installed in a
place and manner as mutually agreed upon. All equipment furnished
and installed by the Company shall be and remain the property of
the Company. When excess facilities are provided to supply
electricity at more than one delivery point, the Company supplied
facilities interconnecting the delivery points shall be located on
the Customer's premises. The charge for such excess facilities
shall be calculated as specified in the Excess Facilities service
Rate schedule attached hereto.
C. Whenever a Customer requests the Company to furnish an
alternate source of supply that the Company would not normally
furnish, the Facilities Charge for the alternate supply facilities
shall be calculated as specified in the Excess Facilities Service
Rate schedule attached. When the facilities used to provide
alternate service to a Customer are also used to serve other
customers, the cost of such facilities shall be included in the
calculation of the Facilities Charge only in the proportion that
the capacity reserved for alternate service to the Customer bears
to the operating capacity of such facilities.
D. The Company shall not be required to make such
installations of equipment and facilities in addition to those
normally provided until the parties have executed such agreements
and fulfilled such other conditions as may be appropriate for the
installation contemplated.
E. Electricity will be supplied in accordance with this
section XI for the purpose of master metering residential dwelling
units only at those Customer locations contracting or applying for
such service or for which a building permit has been obtained prior
to July 1, 1980. A master metered residential dwelling unit
includes, but is not limited to, Apartments, Townhouses,
Condominiums, and Mobile Home Parks.
F. Nothing in this section XI. shall be construed to
prohibi t the Customer from serving any Customer load on any
contiguous property whether or not divided by a public street,
road, highway, alley or property not owned by the Customer through
Customer owned I maintained and operated equipment so long as the
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
16 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
'other provisions of these Terms and Conditions are not violated.
XII. STANDBY, MAINTENANCE AND PARALLEL OPERATION SERVICE FOR
CUSTOMERS OPERATING AN ELECTRIC POWER PLANT
A Customer operating an electric power plant in parallel with
the Company's facilities and requiring standby, maintenance or
parallel operation service may elect service under this Agreement
provided the Customer contracts for the maximum kW which the
Company is to supply at a delivery point. standby, maintenance or
parallel operation service is subject to the following provisions:
A. suitable relays, metering equipment and protective
apparatus shall be furnished, installed, and maintained at
the Customer's expense in accordance with specifications
furnished by the Company. The relays and protecti ve
equipment shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to
inspection by the Company's authorized representative.
B. In case the highest average demand measured during any 30-
minute interval (Maximum Measured Demand) exceeds the
contract demand, the contract demand shall be increased by
such excess demand. The contract demand may be changed by
mutual agreement as to the amount of change and term of
agreement; however, in no case shall the contract demand
be reduced below the Maximum Measured Demand of the
preceding eleven billing months.
C. The monthly charge for electricity under this section
shall be as shown in Schedule C - Municipal and County
Miscellaneous and Standby Charges or, if applicable, as
specified in Schedule 130 - Municipal and County Large
Miscellaneous Light and Power Service or Schedule 131 -
Municipal and County Thermal Storage.
XIII. INTERRUPTIONS TO THE SUPPLY OF ELECTRICITY
A. The Company will use reasonable efforts to furnish an
uninterrupted supply of electricity, but it does not undertake to
guarantee such an uninterrupted supply. Therefore, should the
supply of electricity fail or be interrupted or become defective
through an act of God, or the public enemy, or Federal, State,
Municipal, County or other public authority, or because of
accident, strikes or labor troubles, or any other cause beyond the
reasonable control of the Company, the Company shall not be liable
for such failure, interruption or defect.
B. In the event of a power shortage or an adverse
condition or disturbance on the system of the Company or on any
other directly or indirectly interconnected system, the Company
may, without notice and without incurring liability, take such
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
17 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
emergency action as, in the judgment of the Company, may be
necessary. Such emergency action may include, but not be limited
to, reduction or interruption of the supply of electricity to
some customers or areas in order to compensate for a power shortage
on the Company system or to limit the extent or duration of the
adverse condition of disturbance on the Company's system or to
prevent damage to the Customer's equipment or the Company's
generation or transmission facilities, or to expedite the
restoration of service. The Company may also reduce the supply of
electricity to compensate for an emergency condition on an
interconnected system.
C. In the event the Company cannot supply all of its
customers their usual requirements by reason of strikes, accidents,
want of fuel, or for any other reason, the Company may, without
notice and without incurring liability, implement a distribution
circuit disconnection procedure on a rotating basis to the extent
necessary to prevent an uncontrolled power interruption or to
conserve fuel, to the extent required under the circumstances, in
which event the amount of load curtailed, the length of each
circuit's outage, and the duration of the program will be
determined on the basis of what is, in the Company's opinion,
reasonably necessary to minimize adverse impact on the public
health and safety and facilitate restoration of normal service to
all customers at the earliest time practicable.
D. If the Company in good faith believes that, because of
civil disorder, riot, insurrection, war, fire, or other conditions
beyond the reasonable control of the Company in the vicinity of its
energized facilities, it is necessary to de-energize a portion of
its facilities for the protection of the public, or if ordered by
duly constituted public authority to do so, the Company may,
without incurring liability, de-energize its facilities in such
vicinity or in such related area as may be practically required,
and the Company shall not be obligated to furnish electric service
through such facilities, but the Company shall be prompt and
diligent in re-energizing its facilities and restoring its service
as soon as it believes in the exercise of reasonable care for the
protection of the public and the employees of the Company that such
action can be taken with reasonable safety.
Electric - Virginia
Municipal and County
18 of 18
01-28-91
3WAC118.man
ALBEMARU. 1199 Fifth Street, sW'
COUNTY OF CharlotteSl'llle, Virginia 22902
., ""
February 24, 1992
~
EXECUTIVE OfFICI .
ejJP, " jJ-;;: VIRGINIA POWER
~(~~d '50,
. jr~r If
Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Tucker:
The negotiating committee for the Virginia
Virginia Association of Counties, and
successfully concluded negotiations for a
Agreement for use by cities, towns, counties,
in the Virginia Power service area.
Municipal League, the
Virginia Power have
new electric service
and other authorities
Enclosed are three copies of the new Agreement to be executed by
you and returned to us for approval. After such approval, a copy
will be returned to you for your files.
The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 1991 to June 30,
1994. Please note that the Agreement will be retroactive to July
1, 1991.
Also enclosed is a self-addressed envelope to be used for returning
the Agreements to us by April 1, 1992.
If we can be of assistance to you at any time, please feel free to
call on us on 1-800-825-2518.
Sincerely,
-1 [AtJ;k___
F. E. Berndsen
Coordinator, Marketing Services
Enclosures
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
!yLtV((AL 1, ) 9 7 ~
t):2, dJ-/C}j /t/&
fUlt~~ ~~4
~c..~ II ti: () 0 vJ v-vK-... ):L (SS/~
Form. 3
7/25/86
. ....
l ..
Distributed to BC"rd' '7., C G'"
, .". . -=- (. ~ . Ie
Aaanri~ '. / -
'",,,, ,,," 1(''''' ~'J ...!.L2 1'. ?
vi,. f,. , I.) O'l....{.'17
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
r
. .
; \;: "
~; ~) '~l'~
Memorandum
I'
"J1t2.r:'~j r:.,
, .
FR
'."
,
DATE: February 25, 1992
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive. ,'\ .-;r j '! ..
FROM: Robert W. Paskel, Division superintendent~
RE: Request for Appropriation of Virginia commission of the
Arts Grant
At its meeting on February 24, 1992, the School Board
accepted a $300.00 grant for Stony Point Elementary School from
the Virginia commission for the Arts. This grant is designed to
help strengthen the quality of arts education in the schools and
to encourage the integration of the arts into the basic
curriculum. Stony Point will use this money, in addition to
$300.00 from their operating budget, to implement the Whizz,
Zoom, Whirr Project. The objective of this project is to
actively involve all fourth graders in using cameras as a
journalistic tool that will authentically link photography to
writing for publication.
It is requested the Board of Supervisors amend the
appropriation ordinance to receive and disburse these funds as
follows:
Revenue:
2-2000-24000-240423
VA COMM ARTS GT 92-0812
$300.00
Expenditure:
1-2211-61101-800100
Machinery & Equipment
$300.00
\TLSH
xc: Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
Lettie Neher
Tracy Holt
COUNTY OF AlBEMAHLE:.
~. "{"Ii 1:;::1 i. ....,!;
.~.. ~.., .~...,_..=-<--,.._-, ..' .
<.,,~V -"v. ."
i tf FE8 2~ JqQ? .... ~
I...~ .~ \. U:i '
~ t:... ~~~;-""'""";~"'~- 3": _'
'I ~::~~,"':~;C.;_.;::.r!., -,::: -' r'O, '::::......
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
DATE: February 25, 1992
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
FROM: Robert W. Paskel, Division superintendent~
RE: Request for Appropriation of Virginia commission of the
Arts Grant
At its meeting on February 24, 1992, the School Board
accepted a $300.00 grant for stony Point Elementary School from
the virginia commission for the Arts. This grant is designed to
help strengthen the quality of arts education in the schools and
to encourage the integration of the arts into the basic
curriculum. Stony Point will use this money, in addition to
$300.00 from their operating budget, to implement the Whizz,
Zoom, Whirr Project. The objective of this project is to
actively involve all fourth graders in using cameras as a
journalistic tool that will authentically link photography to
writing for publication.
It is requested the Board of supervisors amend the
appropriation ordinance to receive and disburse these funds as
follows:
Revenue:
2-2000-24000-240423
VA COMM ARTS GT 92-0812
$300.00
Expenditure:
1-2211-61101-800100
Machinery & Equipment
$300.00
\TLSH
xc: Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
Lettie Neher
Tracy Holt
to
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910039
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION TO EXPENDED FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE VA COMM OF THE ARTS.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTERICATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1221161101800100 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $300.00
TOTAL
$300.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2200024000240423 VA COMM OF THE ARTS $300.00
TOTAL
$300.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER: SCHOOLS
APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~~~-- /- :2 7-7'.:2-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 3-b~ 2-
Dlstribt!t~d f(\ e{)~r,.r."
, '-.U. -L "Lelt.,
l.oo;l'} (',.:. !'.. ~, ~. I
.--., .', r., J. ,-12~3() ,/, fij
~
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FROM:
COUNTY OF l\LBEM/\RLt
n 1 rr.;J r::~) 'i:1 nIl n r-::J
, 11<_d,_,.L._,.,,,.., L, j I n
I ...0 "'1'.; j
~\~ FES 2,r>tI992 )i I
I}", J II i
February 25, 1992 L\ U;~C::jIt:;TJ"lT-P,:~:, II.J
Robert w. Tucker, Jr., County Executive BOARD OF SUPEh'Vi-S'Oj~'S
Robert W. Paskel, Division superintendent~
Request for Appropriation - Self-Sustaining Funds
Memorandum
DATE:
TO:
RE:
The attachment details an appropriation request pertaining
to three self-sustaining funds. The Textbook Fund currently has
a fund balance of $157,063.58. Of the $157,063.58, $140,000.00
has been appropriated through the normal budget process. It is
requested the remaining $17,063.58 be appropriated to support
textbook purchases anticipated in FY 1991-92.
Albemarle County Public Schools received a $20,000.00 grant
from the G.E. Elfun Society in FY 1990-91. A portion of the
grant was expended in FY 1990-91, a balance of $14,633.05
remains. It is requested the remaining portion of the grant be
appropriated to support the continued enhancement of the math and
science curriculum.
In FY 1990-91, the Division also received a grant regarding
Process Approach Learning(PAL) and a Title II Program Grant
regarding the infusion of literature into the science curriculum.
Both grants were not fully expended last fiscal year. The
Process Approach Learning Grant will continue to support the
science initiative at Greer Elementary School. The Title II
Grant will enable the Division to purchase books and to train
teachers to integrate them into the science curriculum.
At its meeting on February 24, 1992, the School Board
approved a motion to request the Board of Supervisors to
reappropriate the above mentioned funds and to amend the
appropriations ordinance accordingly. Please refer to the
attached line item budget.
Attachment
\TLSH
xc: Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
Lettie Neher
Tracy Holt
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE:.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910036
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
TEXTBOOK
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION TO USE REMAINING FUND BALANCE.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1340063070601200 TEXTBOOK EXPENSES $17,063.58
TOTAL
$17,063.58
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2340051000510100
APP. FROM FUND BALANCE
$17,063.58
TOTAL
$17,063.58
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
APPROVALS:
SCHOOLS
SIGNATURE
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~/~~
~-..2?- 92-
..::? ~j? ~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
...
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910037
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
G E ELFUN GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION TO USE REMAINING FUND BALANCE.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTERICATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1320461311601300 INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES $14,633.05
TOTAL
$14,633.05
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2320451000510100 APP. FROM FUND BALANCE $14,633.05
TOTAL
$14,633.05
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER: SCHOOLS
APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE :t#~ .A' -;;z. ? ....,PZ
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 3-~ ?',;,--
tn~
~tn
0l:J
0::>
_CI
-l:J
~~
uZ
HO
~H
r.1:l~
::>H
PoI~
;...~
~O
Z~
::>PoI
Oll-o
u<
l:JC'ol
~O\
~~
l:J0\
r.1:l~
~;...
<~
.
Q
Z
::>
~
:>0::
o
o
r.1:l
~
><
l:J
~
co co U"'l U"'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U"'l U"'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M M M M N N 0 " U"'l ~ 0 0 0 0 0
"" "" M M " " 0 M r-l M "" 0 0\ M 0\
0 0 "" "" 0\ CO N 0- N U"'l N "" IJ"l 0- IJ"l
" " ~ ~ 0 " ~ r-l \D N \D
r-l r-l r-l r-l r-l C'ol r-l C'ol
(/)0 (/)0 (/)0 (/)0 (/)0 (/)0 (/)0 (/)0 (/)0 (/)0 <.n- <I'> (/)0 <I'>
C!)
~
:l
~
~
'0
c::
C!)
:<
t.:.J
tIl
c::
o
.~
~
0..
.~
~
U
tIl
.0
:l
t.f.l
-<:l
tIl
.!lI::
o
o
=:l
tIl
Q)
tIl
c::
Q)
0..
X
t.:.J
.!lI::
o
o
.0
~
X
Q)
E-c
o
o
N
r-l
o
""
,
o
"
o
M
""
,
o
o
~
M
,
r-l
I
Q)
U
c::
ell
r-l
ell
=:l
'0
c::
:l
>:.
,
c::
o
.~
~
ell
~
~
0..
o
~
0..
0..
<
tIl
~
(l)
~
tIl
c::
C\1
~
E-c
o
o
r-l
o
r-l
U"'l
,
o
o
o
r-l
U"'l
,
o
o
~
M
I
N
tIl
Q)
~
r-l
0..
0..
:l
t.f.l
r-l
C\1
c::
o
~
~
u
:l
~
~
tIl
c::
H
~
~
C
z
::>
~
~
l:J
l:J
C
o
o
M
r-l
o
""
,
r-l
(l) r-l
~ M
:l r-l
W ""
~. ,
"0 ~
c:: 0
(l) N
M
:< I
t:J r-l
l-4
C\1
r-l
:l
bO
Q)
~
,
c::
o
~
w
u
:l
l-4
w
tIl
c::
H
.......
W
c::
Q)
e
Q)
>
o
~
0..
e
H
J
Q)
U
c::
ell
r-l
C\1
=:l
"0
c::
:l
~
I
c::
o
~
w
ell
~
l-4
0..
o
l-4
0..
0..
<
tIl
l-4
Q)
~
tIl
c::
C\1
l-4
E-c
o
o
.-l
o
.-l
U"'l
I
o
o
o
.-l
U"'l
,
~
o
N
M
,
N
~
Z
~
C
~
C
o
~
ll-o
H
H
l:J
~
~
H
~
Q
~
~
Z
~
C
C
Z
H
Z
~
~
:=
u
<
o
~
ll-o
Pol
<
t.f.l
t.f.l
l:J
U
o
~
ll-o
C!)
~
:l
:<
t.:.J
tIl
"0
c::
Q)
0..
~
W
t.f.l
r-l
C\1
c::
o
..-I
W
u
:l
~
W
tIl
c::
H
~
C\1
r-l
:l
bO
Q)
~
I
c::
o
~
w
u
:l
l-4
w
tIl
c::
H
e
o
o
l-4
tIl
tIl
C\1
r-l
U
o
o
M
o
""
.-l
,
.-l
o
.-l
.-l
""
,
,M
o
N
M
,
r-l
<
U
H
~
l-4
ell
.-l
:l
bO
OJ
~
I
c::
o
~
w
u
:l
l-4
w
tIl
c::
H
e
o
o
l-4
tIl
tIl
C\1
.--l
U
o
o
o
o
.--l
N
,
.-l
o
.--l
.--l
""
,
M
o
N
M
,
.-l
tIl
Q)
~
.--l
0..
0..
:l
t.f.l
r-l
ell
c::
o
~
w
u
:l
l-4
~
tIl
c::
H
l-4
C\1
r-l
::l
bO
Q)
~
,
c::
o
~
w
u
::l
l-4
W
tIl
c::
H
e
o
o
l-4
tIl
tIl
C\1
r-l
U
o
o
M
.--l
o
""
I
.-l
o
.-l
r-l
""
I
M
o
N
M
I
.--l
tIl
Q)
U
.~
>
l-4
Q)
t.f.l
.--l
ell
c::
o
.~
tIl
tIl
Q)
~
o
l-4
Po<
l-4
ell
r-l
::l
bO
Q)
~
I
c::
o
.~
w
()
:l
l-4
W
tIl
c::
H
.......
W
c::
Q)
e
Q)
>
o
l-4
0..
e
H
o
o
U"'l
N
r-l
M
I
.--l
.--l
M
.-l
""
I
M
o
N
M
I
.--l
c::
o
.~
w
ell
U
::l
"0
t.:.J
I
.--l
Q)
~
l-4
E-c
l-4
C\1
.--l
::l
bO
Q)
r:r.:
,
c::
o
.~
w
u
::l
l-4
W
tIl
c::
H
.......
W
c::
Q)
e
Q)
>
o
l-4
0..
e
H
o
o
~
o
U"'l
Ll'I
,
.--l
.--l
M
.--l
""
I
M
o
N
M
,
r-l
tIl
:l
o
Q)
c::
ell
.--l
r-l
Q)
U
tIl
.~
~
l-4
ell
.--l
:l
bO
Q)
~
I
c::
o
~
w
u
:l
l-4
W
tIl
c::
H
.......
~
c::
Q)
e
Q)
>
o
l-4
0..
e
H
o
o
o
o
CO
Ll'I
,
.--l
.--l
M
.--l
""
,
M
o
N
M
,
r-l
tIl
Q)
~
.--l
0..
0..
::l
t.f.l
-<:l
~
<
E-c
o
~
tIl
r-l
ell
.~
l-4
Q)
w
ell
~
bO
c::
~
"0
c::
.~
=:l
-<:l
bO
c::
~
~
c::
~
l-4
P-<
l-4
C\1
r-l
:l
bO
Q)
r:r.:
I
c::
o
.~
w
u
:l
l-4
W
tIl
c::
H
.......
~
c::
Q)
e
Q)
>
o
~
0..
e
H
l-4
ell
r-l
::l
bO
Q)
r:r.:
,
c::
o
.~
w
u
:l
l-4
w
tIl
c::
H
.......
W
c::
(l)
e
Q)
>
o
~
0..
e
H
o
o
.-l
o
o
""
,
.--l
.-l
M
.--l
""
,
M
o
N
M
,
.--l
o
o
"
.--l
o
""
,
.--l
.--l
M
.-l
""
I
M
o
N
M
I
.--l
~!
t:J
:>
t:J
r:r.:
w
c::
C\1
l-4
t.?
~
<
~
o
~
........
U
t.f.l
~
H
'--'
(l)
::l
c::
Q)
>
Q)
r:r.:
w
c::
cd
l-4
t.?
l-4
l-4
::l
U
Q)
()
c::
(l)
~
U
t.f.l
Q)
W
cd
W
tr.l
I
"0
.~
<
.--l
ell
l-4
Q)
"0
Q)
~
,
"0
..-I
<
.--l
C\1
U
.~
l-4
o
bO
OJ
w
ell
U
.--l
ell
U
~
l-4
o
bO
Q)
w
ell
U
o
o
Ll'I
o
~
N
,
o
o
o
~
N
,
M
o
N
M
,
N
co
o
o
o
M
M
,
o
o
o
M
M
I
M
o
N
M
,
N
MOTION: Mrs. Humphris
SE~OND: Mr. Bain
MEETING DATE: March 4, 1992
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has
convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1
requires a certification by the
Supervisors that such executive
conformity with Virginia law;
of the Code of Virginia
Albemarle County Board of
meeting was conducted in
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.
VOTE:
AYES: Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin, Perkins, Bain
and Bowerman.
NAYS: None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE: None.
ABSENT DURING MEETING: None.
Deputy Clerk, Albemarle County ard
of Supervisors
;:. ,2'6' er; Z,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
DATE: February 28, 1992
RE: FY 92-93 School Budget
Enclosed for your early review prior to the March II public hearing
and the budget worksessions is the FY 92-93 School Budget. General
Government's FY 92-93 budget documents will be distributed to you
at the end of ~he March 4 meeting.
RWT,Jr/dbm
92.057
Distributed to r:,::nd: li t '/ '>.
~.gendJ Item No. _Zt.' C ~7(.{ /'7 2-'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
401 MciNTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901-4596
M E M 0 RAN DUM
FROM:
Members of the Board of Supervisors
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CM~
TO:
DATE: February l3, 1992
SUBJECT: Appointments to Various Boards/Commissions/Committees
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: One member. Interviews scheduled for
March 4, 1992.
CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION:
received from advertisement.
One member. Only one application
JAUNT BOARD OF DIRECTORS: One member. Only one application received
from advertisement.
PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY: One member. Interviews
scheduled for March 4, 1992.
LEN:mms
...
INTERVIEWS FOR
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
AND
PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1992
ALBEMARLE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
MEETING ROOM 11, 4TH FLOOR
" /
'"1 JA i; .
Miller /' /'" .
1:00 p.m. Diane Edgar .... "i". ~~;_.:--. , /
,/' , ..-
1:15 p.m. Anne B. Collins /'
1:30 p.m. Ricardo Eugenio Preve /"
1:45 p.m. Mary E. (Betty) Driskill V
2:00 p.m. William A. (Bill) Edgerton /'
2:15 p.m. Alice Page Pool J'
2:30 p.m. John W. Steedly ;/
,. -- ....
.-.-'""-..
\;-.'.1
"..... J
,
~'1.
.. ,
i
,
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
March 6, 1992
Mr. Ricardo E. Preve
949 Huntwood Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Preve:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on March 4, 1992, you
were appointed to the Public Recreational Facilities Authority,
with said term to expire on December 13, 1994.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve
the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
O)~~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/ec
cc: C. Timothy Lindstrom
James L. Camblos, III
.
It -
k-l/ IV 1---;" j1 /(;/ v'"
l..-G I L.- t^-' v ~ v
~"\~
OU
()
OF
aJ~~ 3/4Iq,:)-- ~E
/)h II'll
"-^' Ii JI
,.i ,I
. JIll I ,
iJ U L:=I ~ t::J U t.i t:;,:" q 1~i
. .,~, CrA""",
;BOARD Of SUPfRV~SO~S
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
.'l-, .'.:~
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee Public Recreational Facilities Authority
Applicant's Name Ricardo Eugenio Preve
Home Address 949 Huntwood Lane, Charlottesville VA 22901
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located .1Rrk Tom>rr
Business Address 302 Park Street. Charlottesvnle VA ?:NO?
Phone
296-1464
Employer National Resources Consultants Inc.
Occupation/Title President
Date of Employment September 1, 19R,)
Years Resident of Albemarle County 2+6
Birthdate/Place10/24/S7 Buenos Aires
Argentina
Previous Residence Kansas City, MO
Spouse's Name Robyn Marie Kerler-Preve
Number of Children 2
Education (Degrees arid Graduation Dates) 'AS-Degree Scie~ce, Pif'rlmont VA r.omm ColI.
1979; BS-Degree Agronomy, Virginia Tech. 1981: MS-Degree Forestry, Vjr~iniR Tprh, lQRi
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
Society of American Forf'stf'rs, AssoriRtion of r.onQll1ting For~~ters of America, Virginia
Forestry Association, American Tree Farm System (Member and Inspector).
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
r.iti7.f'ns for Alhf'mRrlp (formpr Mpmhpr RORrn of DirprtorQ, formpr ~prrptRry Rnn
NpWRlpttpr Fnitor). Trout Unlimited, Quail Unlimited; Piedmont EnvironmentRl r.Ol1nril
Organized Yellow Mountain Agric.ll1tllrRl <'lng Forf'stRl DiQrrict
Di'S'":h"J.^ 't 1'1 ' .
,..I,-"t<,C 0 DC3rd: .J::.' ?~ 'f .~.
~;"'rc:l!"".<;'__ ~
f,",'.i/u.~ 1r!'TI No, _
-~
CtNTYOr ~:5MAR@tE
n ~rq H~~~
/ h-,t1:::-,.."-,,,-",~ I
/L.:::t: \ . l........ t ~ ~ "
--- -~, u '.:::l c.:;
8O.AAo Of $UfERV;SOqS
6 Tennis Drive
Charlottesville, Va. 22901
February 18, 1992
Mr. David Bowerman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va. 22902-4596
Dear Mr. Bowerman,
Allow me this opportunity to recommend Ricardo Preve for
the purpose of becoming a member of the Albemarle County
Recreation Facility Authority.
I have known Mr. Preve for several years and have always
found him to be a hard worker with a sincere interest in
public service. I believe he would make a most worthy
contribution to the County of Albemarle.
~i,&relY, /'
,?~A:L~c~ LaL~
Lawrence Cabell
..
'7
\
\ .
i .
\ \
f..""""
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
March 6, 1992
Mrs. Diane E. Miller
5 Ivy Lane
Charlottesville, VA 2290l
Dear Mrs. Miller:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on March 4, 1992, you
were appointed to the Architectural Review Board, with said term to
expire on November ll, 1992.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve
the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
O]~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/ec
cc: C. Timothy Lindstrom
James L. Camblos, III
'.
,
7""......\" -:
,"< <"~ r~
~
~-{~
OU
c;
OF ALS12A1
~)?(~
~ .r) '7
, " i
UL
J.~ D PI. :\ D /.) i
u '_' ,; "" \.
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
rJ -J- ~
l f/ j" I ' .~ '1/.' . , ,
~ I <VvL'L , ~ .t.[{l~
APPLICATION
;, ,t.. .J .'1 ' ;' au
yJ),-/ / ! -(!~L' rn~
n lCU~/U 4 Hv
/1! z-f.lL~llu f-~uYIV f./
TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
Board/Cornmission/Cornmi ttee ENTRANCE CORRIOOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Applicant's Name
DIANE EIX;ERTON MILLER
Home Address 5 IVY LANE; CHARIDTTESVILLE, VA 22901
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located SAMUEL MILLER
Business Address 232 E. HIGH STREET; CHARIDTI'ESVILLE, VA
Phone (804) 979-2722 (H)
Employer W. ALTON JONES FOUNDATION, INC.
Date of Employment
1981
Occupation/Title TRUSTEE
08/16/56
Birthdate/Place BAT.'I'TMORRr MARYT.7\ND
Years Resident of Albemarle County 17
Previous Residence BALTIMORE, MARYLAND
Spouse's Name
ETHAN A. MILLER
Number of Children
3
Education (Degrees arid Graduation Dates)
SEE ATTACHED.
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
SEE ATTACHED.
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
SEE ATTACHED.
)
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee
SEE ATI'ACHED.
The information provided on this application will be released to the
public upon request.
JANUARY 24, 1992
DATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229a.1r4596
Phone: 296-5843
~
)
'.
.
DIANE EDGERTON MILLER
5 IVY LANE
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
(804) 979-2722
SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION TO SERVE ON
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
EDUCATION
Architecture School
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
st. Louis, MO
Degree: Master of Architecture
December 1982
College
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE
Bryn Mawr, PA
Degree: B.A.
May 1978
Major: Fine Arts
Minor: Anthropology
Secondary
ST. ANNES-BELFIELD SCHOOL
Charlottesville, VA
Degree: HS Diploma
May 1974
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPERIENCE
From 1986 through the present, I have served as the sole
Architect on the Spring Hill Subdivision (Ivy, VA) Phase I and
Phase II Architectural Review Boards. The Spring Hill
Subdivision Master Plan was designed by Will Reiley, a local
Landscape Architect/Planner, and currently consists of 33
residential lots on 150 acres and a 525 acre undeveloped residue.
I have a financial interest in Spring Hill.
The Spring Hill Architectural Review Boards have authority over
the review of all plans for new resid~ntial construction as well
as remodeling at Spring Hill. During my tenure on the Boards, we
have reviewed 20-25 sets of new house plans as well as
approximately 10 requests for remodeling/additions. The Spring
Hill architectural review process and standards have been quite
rigorous, probably the most strict of any private subdivision in
Albemarle County. During my time on the Boards, no set of plans
has ever been approved without revisions, and in many cases the
revisions have been substantial. We have also rejected a number
of sets of plans, which resulted in the cancellation of the sales
of the lots in question.
.
Under my leadership, the Boards have strived to maintain a high
degree of aesthetic quality for the homes in Spring Hill and have
paid a great deal of attention to the impact of new homes on
previously constructed homes on neighboring lots. The spring
Hill Restrictions also require Board approval for siting and
landscaping plans for the residences as well as approval for the
cutting of trees in excess of 12" DBH. The Spring Hill Boards
have been quite active in reviewing siting and landscaping plans
and have been quite strict in enforcing the tree cutting
prohibition.
The result of the strong architectural review process at Spring
Hill over the years has been very positive. The Subdivision
itself has been quite successful and regularly receives high
praise from the real estate community. In addition, the
residents themselves remain staunch supporters of maintaining a
strong and active architectural review board as a means of
preserving the beauty of the Subdivision and the values of their
homes.
I have also served on the architectural review committee of the
Farmington Property Owners Association, as noted below.
ARCHITECTURAL EMPLOYMENT
November 1986-September 1989
MAZA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
2 Boars Head Place
Charlottesville, VA
Self-employed Architectural Design Practice
July 1983-August 1984 (part time)
WILLIAM A. EDGERTON, AlA & ASSOCIATES
Charlottesville, VA
Architecture firm
December 1982-July 1983
MARK BECK ASSOCIATES, INC.
Baltimore, MD
Architecture firm
September 1982-December 1982
RTKL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Baltimore, MD
Architecture/Planning/Urban Design firm
Summer 1980
WILSON-JONES ASSOCIATES
st. Louis, MO
Architecture/Planning/Urban Design firm
2
.
May 1978-May 1979
DAY & ZIMMERMAN
Philadelphia, PA
Architecture/Planning/Engineering firm
FAMILY/PERSONAL
Spouse: Ethan A. Miller
Self-employed attorney
Children: Zachary 8 (September 4, 1983)
Madeline 5 (February 14, 1986)
Stephanie 2 (September 26, 1989)
Birthdate: August 16, 1956
MEMBERSHIPS IN FRATERNAL. BUSINESS. CHURCH AND/OR SOCIAL GROUPS
Church: Charlottesville Friends Meeting
Social: Farmington Country Club
Founder and member of monthly book club (reading group)
PUBLIC. CIVIC AND CHARITABLE OFFICES AND/OR OTHER ACTIVITIES OR
INTERESTS
W. Alton Jones Foundation, Inc.
Member of Board of Trustees and Secretary of the
corporation
Non-Profit Charitable Foundation based in
Charlottesville dedicated to World environment and
security issues
1981-Present
Green Lights Directory
Co-Chairman (with Kay Bechtel) of non-prOfit community
directory published for Charlottesville/Albemarle
County
1990-Present
Virginia Discovery Museum
Member of Board of Directors 1987-1988
Chairman of first annual fund raising benefit
Currently developing an Architectural structures
workshop for children at the Museum with Ann
Collins of Johnson, Craven & Gibson
Farmington Property Owners Association
Member of Board of Directors and Architectural Review
Committee
1989
3
.
st. Anne's-Belfield School
Member of Middle School Capital Campaign Committee
1990-1991
REASONS FOR DESIRE TO SERVE ON EC ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
I moved to Albemarle county in 1970 as a freshman in high school
and, with the exception of several years spent in architecture
school and training after I was married, it has been my home
since then. Needless to say, the US Route 29 North Entrance
Corridor to Charlottesville in Albemarle County was quite
different in 1970 than it is now. Like many Charlottesville/
Albemarle residents from that era, the process of watching the US
29 North Entrance Corridor develop has been enormously
distressing. The forests that lined the highway were leveled at
an alarming rate, replaced with asphalt, shopping centers and
signs with largely no attention to aesthetics, leaving an
entrance "strip" in parts barely differentiable from communities
in Florida, Los Angeles or Northern Virginia.
Clearly, Albemarle County and Charlottesville have grown
substantially since 1970 and will continue to grow in future
years because of the quality of life they offer and the natural
beauty of the area. That growth required and will require
commercial development to serve the population and industrial
development to provide employment to the population. It is
imperative in accommodating necessary commercial and industrial
development, that we do not destroy the very reason for the
growth--the beauty of our community.
In my view, development and aesthetics are not antithetical, or
at least they do not have to be. I have travelled widely in the
United States and Europe and can attest that there are
communities that have managed their growth in a fashion which is
desirable from an aesthetic standpoint. It has been popular in
many circles in this community to complain about the "blight" of
the commercial development in the entrance corridors to
Charlottesville, but until the passage of the Entrance Corridor
overlay District amendment to the Albemarle County Zoning
Ordinance in 1990, there was perhaps little else one could do.
Now, there is a real opportunity for this community to have a say
not only in the quantity and location of development, but also in
what it looks like! I believe I can bring a comprehensive
understanding of the issues and tremendous enthusiasm about the
goals of the EC Ordinance to the position on the EC Architectural
Review Board.
I have spent a great deal of time in the past few years dealing
with environmental preservation issues, both in Albemarle
County and elsewhere in the United States and the World, through
my position on the Board of Trustees of the W. Alton Jones
Foundation. My undergraduate degree in Fine Arts, my graduate
4
.
training and degree in Architecture, specializing in design, and
my architectural design practice experience provide me with the
technical tools and aesthetic sensibility to analyze the plans
that will come before the EC Architectural Review Board during my
tenure on the Board. My 6 years of experience on the Spring Hill
Subdivision Architectural Review Boards allows me to bring to the
EC Architectural Review Board a thorough understanding of the
dynamics, both technical and practical, of the process of
architectural review.
My long time social contacts in this community as well as my
present active involvement in community projects will permit me
to bring to the EC Architectural Review Board an exposure to a
broad range of community sentiment and the benefit of interaction
with both long time Albemarle County residents and newer
residents. My position on the Jones Foundation Board is not full
time and will enable me to devote the necessary time to EC
Architectural Review Board matters to do a proper job. Finally,
my past and present financial interest in Albemarle County Rural
Area single family residential development, but not commercial or
industrial development, will allow me to understand the real
financial and time pressures on the Developer's side of the
architectural review process without direct conflicts of
interest.
I think I am a perfect "fit" for the EC Architectural Review
Board, possessing a unique ability to understand and balance the
varied concerns of the community, the environment and the
businesses affected by the process. Ultimately, however, my true
interest in serving on the EC Architectural Review Board is in
preserving the beauty and desirability of Albemarle County
because I plan to live here for the rest of my life.
5
,
\
,
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuei Miller
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
March 6, 1992
Ms. Norma J. Diehl
106 Mountainview Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Diehl:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on March 4, 1992, you
were reappointed to the Public Recreational Facilities Authority,
with said term to expire on December 13, 1994.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to continue
serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
(j)~(j~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/ec
cc: C. Timothy Lindstrom, Chairman
James L. Camblos, III
...,~\
; .,...1
\'
i ,......
t ~ ~
\,'J
"'-'1
\'
\,
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virgin ia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
March 6, 1992
Mr. David A. Moyer
Route l, Box 663
Crozet, VA 22932
Dear Mr. Moyer:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on March 4, 1992, you
were appointed to the Albemarle County Service Authority Board as
the White Hall representative, with said term to expire on April 16,
1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve
the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
(;J4P$~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/ec
cc: J. W. Brent, Executive Director
James L. Camblos, III
r 2
f: j'
I. i r~
'\:!.)
';7
i
1
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901A596
(804) 296,5843 FAX (804) 972A060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
March 6, 1992
Mr. Hollis Lumpkin
PO Box 89
Scottsville, VA 24590
Dear Mr. Lumpkin:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on March 4, 1992, you
were reappointed to the Albemarle County Service Authority Board as
the Scottsville representative, with said term to expire on April l6,
1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to continue
serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
(j)~tf 13~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/ec
cc: J. W. Brent, Executive Director
James L. Camblos, III
'-'~.,
~
7
I
\J
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scoltsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hail
March 6, 1992
Mr. Paul Tompkins
2765 Milton Hills Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Tompkins:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on March 4, 1992, you
were appointed to the Milton Airport Advisory Committee.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve
the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
(j)~~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/ec
cc: J. W. Brent, Executive Director
Albemarle County Service Authority
James L. Camblos, III
-'~7.
/
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
Wh"e Hall
March 6, 1992
Mr. Gerald Dixon
2760 Milton Hills Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Dixon:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on March 4, 1992, you
were appointed to the Milton Airport Advisory Committee.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve
the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
O~6~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/ec
cc: J. W. Brent, Executive Director
Albemarle County Service Authority
James L. Camblos, III
..
.-;
I
i.. i..
j \
1_
Edward H Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
March 6, 1992
Mrs. Betty L. Newell
147 Scarborough Place
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Dear Mrs. Newell:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on March 4, 1992, you
were appointed to the JAUNT Board, with said term to expire on
September 30, 1994.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve
the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
vJ~t?~~
David P. Bowerman
Chairman
DPB/ec
cc: Linda Wilson
James L. Camblos, III
.,
~"'{~ OF ALe~M ~.,.._,
CpV .__ 0;' '':'~~ "tJ?(~COU~~:.~F AL,~~:A~,RLE
~~~'~~J ~O lJC..LL.:".,. t; ill...\;, I rj
VIRG~;\h n L:MN 301992 ,}ill
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 1~U::Jl.:~:) L.'; ,j~V""~' U
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING BOARD OF SUPERV1SOf.(S
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee ~u. ~J.. ~ ~
Applicantls Name ~ L. AJe...LUW
Home Address \ * 1 C:SC-Qr~{ f) u8",CPt&U CAv} VA-- ~q 03
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located ~~~~rte
Business Address \ \ ~O ~ 'I ~ate ~ ~A- Phone
12.dtremW . ~ (f{,C,ftJr([)(. _
Employer . Occupation/Tl tIe MI'L"!J:7" MMLC(/d'Yz)
Date of Employment Birthdate/Place fJJftiJ! DC 'Ir::JJII<f.J-
Years Resident of Albemarle County 6 ~~tprevious Residence Ir&.w~JI\. ~~
Spouse's Name ~~ L }j tLoeh. J ~ Number of Children.Q.. (g.gt5. ~~,30
Educat~on (Degrees arid Graduation Dates) "
1?:>-S \V\' \-\d.I.e~f\OLD~~, lQ"/4,' t2Ld 1xJrnUuM ~'lA.J.QA~--ar
M \V\~S\V-\ec;S~~) \q~~) -P \J ~C- .
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
A kU \JJ
_t=o tllS
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
~SA (~C~\ /\~J\hS&~ ~tiJ CLv'-J~. R~~l~~' ~ ~I~~
-1-~-t-4Cl~ \J&lUk\..T-e..erS M ~ - "{'o-t. ~("
,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, V~ginia 229014596
(804) 296.5823
MEMORANDUM
TO:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and
Community Development
FROM:
David B. Benish, Chief of Community Development
-rW
Tex Weaver, Information Resource Planner
DATE:
March 2, 1992
RE:
Albemarle County Appointments to the Milton
Airport Advisory Committee
The following individuals, recommended by Mr. Bill Brent of
the Albemarle County Service Authority, have accepted to
serve on the Milton Airport citizens Advisory Committee as
representatives of Albemarle County:
Mr. Gerald Dixon
2760 Milton Hills Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(w) 295-9197
(h) 296-4246
Mr. Paul Tompkins
2765 Milton Hills Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(w) 972-7631
(h) 977-1943
Should you have any questions, please let me know.
~
..
'/~,~., ~. ,~)i) ~i. :,.:, _:~i
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
401 MciNTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901-4596
M E M 0 RAN DUM
FROM:
Members of the Board of Supervisors
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CM~
TO:
DATE: February 13, 1992
SUBJECT: Appointments to Various Boards/Commissions/Committees
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: One member. Interviews scheduled for
March 4, 1992.
CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION:
received from advertisement.
One member. Only one application
JAUNT BOARD OF DIRECTORS: One member. Only one application received
from advertisement.
PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY: One member. Interviews
scheduled for March 4, 1992.
LEN:mms
~~\,
6 Tennis Drive
Charlottesville, Va. 22901
February 18, 1992
Mr. David Bowerman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va. 22902-4596
Dear Mr. Bowerman,
Allow me this opportunity to recommend Ricardo Preve for
the purpose of becoming a member of the Albemarle County
Recreation Facility Authority.
I have known Mr. Preve for several years and have always
found him to be a hard worker with a sincere interest in
public service. I believe he would make a most worthy
contribution to the County of Albemarle.
~~~~ c:;.L~
Lawrence Sabell
f>-\..0 €oM AR LE
'./
\) '-..,; ~~,
,.. r\ :;",>.'.)
. '"
>'
o~~
~\~
~~~
> ......
'-,.:.i '.J :.
!'" r" .... 'J
.,-,V
~
to S.
~.(lv~
..
r;~'~_~r;!T'/ C:F !\!~BEr,~p.,R~2'\
'\
~I-- ~; .,-.--:: (..,~~-~ '.<-'._,~ '. :.~- ....~ '-..
. /----~~_......_.~- ~ _... ... -",.
.J.,.\. 1 :~ 7
)
f ,,',_
, i
u l.; :,-=-.~
;. J :.; u ( ~j:..; ::.\; I ,~j V ',-J,
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee ENTRANCE CORRIOOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Applicant's Name
DIANE EDGERTON MILLER
Home Address 5 IVY LANE; CHARIDTI'ESVILLE, VA 22901
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located SAMUEL MILLER
Business Address 232 E. HIGH STREET; CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
Phone (804) 979-2722 (H)
..
Date of Employment
1981
Occupation/Title TRUS~
08/16/56
Birthdate/Place RAT,'1'TMnRF., MARYT.J\ND
Previous Residence BALTIMORE, Wffi~
~mployer W. ALTON JONES FOUNDATION, INC.
Years Resident of Albemarle County 17
Spouse's Name
ETHAN A. MILLER
Number of Children
3
Education (Degrees arid Graduation Dates)
SEE ATTACHED.
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
SEE ATTACHED.
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
SEE ATTACHED.
.
I
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Corrunission/Corrunittee
-.....
SEE ATI'ACHED.
The information provided on this application will be released to the
public upon request.
JANUARY 24, 1992
DATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229a.1r4596
Phone: 296-584~
~
)
'.
DIANE EDGERTON MILLER
5 IVY LANE
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
(804) 979-2722
SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION TO SERVE ON
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
.
EDUCATION
Architecture School
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
st. Louis, MO
Degree: Master of Architecture
December 1982
College
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE
Bryn Mawr, PA
Degree: B.A.
May 1978
Major: Fine Arts
Minor: Anthropology
Secondary
ST. ANNES-BELFIELD SCHOOL
Charlottesville, VA
Degree: HS Diploma
May 1974
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPERIENCE
From 1986 through the present, I have served as the sole
Architect on the Spring Hill Subdivision (Ivy, VA) Phase I and
Phase II Architectural Review Boards. The Spring Hill
Subdivision Master Plan was designed by will Reiley, a local
Landscape Architect/Planner, and currently consists of 33
residential lots on 150 acres and a 525 acre undeveloped residue.
I have a financial interest in spring Hill.
The spring Hill Architectural Review Boards have authority over
the review of all plans for new residential construction as well
as remodeling at spring Hill. During my tenure on the Boards, we
have reviewed 20-25 sets of new house plans as well as
approximately 10 requests for remodeling/additions. The Spring
Hill architectural review process and standards have been quite
rigorous, probably the most strict of any private subdivision in
Albemarle County. During my time on the Boards, no set of plans
has ever been approved without revisions, and in many cases the
revisions have been substantial. We have also rejected a number
of sets of plans, which resulted in the cancellation of the sales
of the lots in question.
'.
Under my leadership, the Boards have strived to maintain a high
degree of aesthetic quality for the homes in Spring Hill and have
paid a great deal of attention to the impact of new homes on
previously constructed homes on neighboring lots. The Spring
Hill Restrictions also require Board approval for siting and
landscaping plans for the residences as well as approval for the
cutting of trees in excess of 12" DBH. The spring Hill B~ards
have been quite active in reviewing siting and landscaping plans
and have been quite strict in enforcing the tree cutting
prohibition.
The result of the strong architectural review process at Spring
Hill over the years has been very positive. The Subdivision
itself has been quite successful and regularly receives high
praise from the real estate community. In addition, the
residents themselves remain staunch supporters of maintaining a
strong and active architectural review board as a means of
preserving the beauty of the Subdivision and the values of their
homes.
I have also served on the architectural review committee of the
Farmington Property Owners Association, as noted below.
ARCHITECTURAL EMPLOYMENT
November 1986-September 1989
MAZA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
2 Boars Head Place
Charlottesville, VA
Self-employed Architectural Design Practice
July 1983-August 1984 (part time)
WILLIAM A. EDGERTON, AlA & ASSOCIATES
Charlottesville, VA
Architecture firm
December 1982-July 1983
MARK BECK ASSOCIATES, INC.
Baltimore, MD
Architecture firm
September 1982-December 1982
RTKL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Baltimore, MD
Architecture/Planning/Urban Design firm
Summer 1980
WILSON-JONES ASSOCIATES
st. Louis, MO
Architecture/Planning/Urban Design firm
2
May 1978-May 1979
DAY & ZIMMERMAN
Philadelphia, PA
Architecture/Planning/Engineering firm
FAMILY/PERSONAL
Spouse: Ethan A. Miller
Self-employed attorney
Children: Zachary 8 (September 4, 1983)
Madeline 5 (February 14, 1986)
stephanie 2 (September 26, 1989)
Birthdate: August 16, 1956
MEMBERSHIPS IN FRATERNAL. BUSINESS. CHURCH AND/OR SOCIAL GROUPS
Church: Charlottesville Friends Meeting
Social: Farmington country Club
Founder and member of monthly book club (reading group)
PUBLIC. CIVIC AND CHARITABLE OFFICES AND/OR OTHER ACTIVITIES OR
INTERESTS
W. Alton Jones Foundation, Inc.
Member of Board of Trustees and Secretary of the
Corporation
Non-Profit Charitable Foundation based in
Charlottesville dedicated to World environment and
security issues
1981-Present
Green Lights Directory
Co-Chairman (with Kay Bechtel) of non-profit community
directory published for Charlottesville/Albemarle
County
1990-Present
Virginia Discovery Museum
Member of Board of Directors 1987-1988
Chairman of first annual fund raising benefit
Currently developing an Architectural structures
workshop for children at the Museum with Ann
Collins of Johnson, Craven & Gibson
Farmington Property Owners Association
Member of Board of Directors and Architectural Review
Committee
1989
3
st. Anne's-Belfield School
Member of Middle School Capital campaign Committee
1990-1991
REASONS FOR DESIRE TO SERVE ON EC ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
I moved to Albemarle County in 1970 as a freshman in high school
and, with the exception of several years spent in architecture
school and training after I was married, it has been my home
since then. Needless to say, the US Route 29 North Entrance
Corridor to Charlottesville in Albemarle County was quite
different in 1970 than it is now. Like many Charlottesville/
Albemarle residents from that era, the process of watching the US
29 North Entrance Corridor develop has been enormously
distressing. The forests that lined the highway were leveled at
an alarming rate, replaced with asphalt, shopping centers and
signs with largely no attention to aesthetics, leaving an
entrance "strip" in parts barely differentiable from communities
in Florida, Los Angeles or Northern Virginia.
Clearly, Albemarle County and Charlottesville have grown
substantially since 1970 and will continue to grow in future
years because of the quality of life they offer and the natural
beauty of the area. That growth required and will require
commercial development to serve the population and industrial
development to provide emplOYment to the population. It is
imperative in accommodating necessary commercial and industrial
development, that we do not destroy the very reason for the
growth--the beauty of our community.
In my view, development and aesthetics are not antithetical, or
at least they do not have to be. I have travelled widely in the
United States and Europe and can attest that there are
communities that have managed their growth in a fashion which is
desirable from an aesthetic standpoint. It has been popular in
many circles in this community to complain about the "blight" of
the commercial development in the entrance corridors to
Charlottesville, but until the passage of the Entrance Corridor
Overlay District amendment to the Albemarle County Zoning
Ordinance in 1990, there was perhaps little else one could do.
Now, there is a real opportunity for this community to have a say
not only in the quantity and location of development, but also in
what it looks like! I believe I can bring a comprehensive
understanding of the issues and tremendous enthusiasm about the
goals of the EC Ordinance to the position on the EC Architectural
Review Board.
I have spent a great deal of time in the past few years dealing
with environmental preservation issues, both in Albemarle
County and elsewhere in the United States and the World, through
my position on the Board of Trustees of the W. Alton Jones
Foundation. My undergraduate degree in Fine Arts, my graduate
4
training and degree in Architecture, specializing in design, and
my architectural design practice experience provide me with the
technical tools and aesthetic sensibility to analyze the plans
that will come before the EC Architectural Review Board during my
tenure on the Board. My 6 years of experience on the spring Hill
Subdivision Architectural Review Boards allows me to bring to the
EC Architectural Review Board a thorough under.standing of the
dynamics, both technical and practical, of the process of
architectural review.
My long time social contacts in this community as well as my
present active involvement in community projects will permit me
to bring to the EC Architectural Review Board an exposure to a
broad range of community sentiment and the benefit of interaction
with both long time Albemarle County residents and newer
residents. My position on the Jones Foundation Board is not full
time and will enable me to devote the necessary time to EC
Architectural Review Board matters to do a proper job. Finally,
my past and present financial interest in Albemarle County Rural
Area single family residential development, but not commercial or
industrial development, will allow me to understand the real
financial and time pressures on the Developer's side of the
architectural review process without direct conflicts of
interest.
I think I am a perfect "fit" for the EC Architectural Review
Board, possessing a unique ability to understand and balance the
varied conc~rns of the community, the environment and the
businesses affected by the process. Ultimately, however, my true
interest in serving on the EC Architectural Review Board is in
preserving the beauty and desirability of Albemarle County
because I plan to live here for the rest of my life.
5
""
.
,
N~~
0'0
()
OF
JAN 2 7 1992
:;.,-.-:~
!;";- /:.L?~~:'.~ ~1-'~
," '-t..
I :'.
.... . '. j:::: ~"
OFFIC':: OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
.
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
t...., _4 '-__ __
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
"
.-l
,J.j-<_._~~
oa~
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee Architectural Review Board
Applicant's Name Anne Be Collins, AlA
Home Address
Route 3, Box 25l, Charlottesville VA 22903
Magisterial District in which your home residence2 is located Samuel Miller
2902
~usiness Address 612 East Jefferson Street, Ch'ville VA Phone 296-6107
Employer JOhnson, Craven & Gibson, Inc.
Occupation/Title Architect
l2/l6j54
Birthdate/PlaceCh'ville VA
.'
Date of Employment 2 February 1982
Years Resident of Albemarle County 32
Previous ResidenceBaltimore MD
Spouse's Name Bruce H. Collins
Number of Children
-0-
Education (Degrees ariq Graduation Dates) ff. $. Archite?ture, UVA, 1977:
Masters of Architecture, University of Illinois, 1980; Maryland Registration
1985; NCARB Registration, 1986; Virginia Architectural 'Registration, 1989.
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
Charlottesville/Albemarle County Chamber of Commerce
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
President, Charlottesville/Albemarle Section of AlA
3ecretary, James River Chapter of AlA
Advisory Committee, Piedmont Virginia Community College
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee
To assist in establishing a direction for the development of
Albemarle County.
The information provided on this application will be released to the
public upon request.
~" ~ ~) .
MV'_ t5 . f,/{ ~
SIGNATURE
27 January 1992
DATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229a.1r4596
-"
Phone: 296-5843
'.
-",
"
~~~
00
C;
OF ALe~A1
~~(~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
D. [f: f?') f"2 ruJ.1l.Q7 I ~
! \ I,
in \ JAN 27 1992 ) II i
!.i. /I'il
f ; i ' , --.....-._. , 1
II w ~ '- ; t..n i ~ -"-r;-"f. $"~ i
"--J '-..I .~ U U t;;;:-J ,..-..j
BeARD Cf S"UPEHYISO~S
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
'.,... .":."':.
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 2.2.901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee Public Recreational Facilities Authority
Applicant's Name Ricardo Eugenio Preve
Home Address 949 Huntwood Lane, Charlottesville VA 22901
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located ,TRrk Tnm>rr
Business Address 302 Park Street. Charlottesville VA nQ07
Phone
2Qfi-14fi4
Employer National Resources Consultants Inc.
Occupation/Title President
,"
Date of Employment September 1, 1 Q!i,
Years Resident of Albemarle County 2+6
Birthdate/Place10/24/57 Buenos Aires
Argentina
Previous Residence Kansas City, MO
Spouse's Name Robyn Marie Kerler-Preve
Number of Children 2
Education (Degrees arid Graduation Dates) AS-Degree Scie?ce. Pi pc!mnnr VA rnmm con.
1979; BS-Degree Agronomy, Virginia Tech, 1981: MS-Degree Forestry, VireiniR Tprn, lQR~
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
Socletv of Amerlcan ~or~~~pr~ A ~ ~ r ,~, ~ t of America, Vl'rOl'nl'a
. . f' r......, ,.." RRoriR, inn nT nnC:ll I ,ng ~or~9 ers l!I ---
Forestry Association, American Tree Farm System (Member and InsDector).
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
Citi7.pnR for AlnpmRrlp (fnrmpr Mpmnpr RnRrn nf nirprrnrc:, rnrmpr SprrprRry Rnn
Npwc:lprrpr Fnirnr). Trout Unlimited, Quail Unlimited~ Piedmont EnvironmpntRl rnl1nril
Organized Yellow Mountain AgricnltnrRl ~nd ForeRtRl nic:trict
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee
I have a personal, long-standing commitment and interest in open space preservation.
As a forester, agronomist, and landowner I can bring a stron~ professional and
p~rQon~l background to serve on the Authority.
The information provided on this application
public upon request.
be released to the
January 27, 1992
DATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
40l McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229Q1r4596
#,,,-,,,
Phone:
296-5843.
'.
,....""\,,"~\ ~r" ,
\.: -' -, ',~ :. ~- = '~ ~., ~ ~ l L 8 \\~
-= ~'!
,~- ....
.......... .,1 .....
:~' l~ ,':J:j t C . ~ ;'; ..~~ ( ~ ~', j/
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee A RCff /TFcTUi<A L R EV/E W BOff!<fJ
Applicant's Name N)ftF..Y E. (RETrV) PRISklLL
I1A IL n/6 IIi/ORE Sf .-
Home Address R () II Tt (PILI 6fti<Tf/ f{OA-D. f!tJ. Box 1/'1'1 CHfT-RL,()!TE\VILLE VI'!
I . 221~~
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located uJH/TEHALL
2cj2 2M..!T N/1J
Business Address ( PO. Bo'X .I jL.pf) Cflf1RUJnc(V/L/....f:- r' (/A Phone '213 f;5h 5
Employer M.E OP../S.k/LL, . fll<CHITECT Occupation/Title f!<INOPAL
POK.T.5MOU7
Date of Employment FE B /9R 6 - PI? c5F NT Birthdate/Place '3/z.~/C; 7 VIRGIN/A-
Years Resident of Albemarle County / / Previous Residence t. VN(;Iff3t1l<tSt. tI.-t
, ,
Spouse's Name -
Number of Children
Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates)
. (COMM€/Vf?ArJON FOP-
MAY /q71 e. 5. A~alltFavRt mE ()N/(/&r<(,/fY ~F IJIR.&JNIA EXC~LL-ff"AlCE IN OfSlf:,N)
Memberships
I/IS/TlNU UE.cTVI<.E.te - U. CIA. - /q,f' 2~ /qg3 I f1 f7.M JjJ[X IJr Pl<.fZS!3 Y"rEle.IAN CII~(jf IN C/IJCH!){/K6
. p.1'KIIl M' U
ArrENfl ()L.f /JET {?/l~S6Y~I?I/tJV i!%f1Jllit?tlt I 1 /VI C/l1
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
/:"'Ai( f?:.f?-/.( /JAY -/)t/ftJl?o MIOOf-E SlflotJt-
,
/J ff)~ HoR~€-S - L~E AI1JIM~ 1 dvrDO?'t<..S_
i fll"fNNIN6 '5n/o/t:J ti7 Ci/(..VM(J(/1 fNIVe~.J(r! ~,.4M (/tIrl'r<is~!) It! PRdI>fJ~T7;./6
r DevEIAPIY}/1:MT IA! w-'t(s l1J/+tCI-f F~Ii>Uv'E me (t;/rVry f sEtZtN fry of IJ()F(
{J1Gf3AfI} HEr<IT~€r-
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee
WISH 7lJ Se.f,vp (AI PVBL./C CA-rf+{.jrY W ?051T1U€L-( IJJfLI/GNCIi 71Ie
OIf{EC17orJ rJf &j(OfAJTH IN O{JI( tAjMMfJNITY / To (JN~sr/HV/) 1 (j)rJRJ::. If 71/E
. I /
;veGP) OF Df::IJpJ6 P 1'1 ~I\JT f -,a H~LP C-tJfVmtJ L- THE AGS77i€ 71C 5flJj.IJPt?i< ~p
The inform~{on~~~d on this application will be released to the
public upon request.
A~[~
SIGNATURE
;/2-1 liZ
'/ ATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
_.
Phone: 296-584l
~91,
William A Edgerton ALA
& Associates
804-295-5200
Architects - Planners
C,(~::;_j ';\.}
i.'
" :.~ fq,trRt?:146
January 20, 199:2.
. ,-\
.'
Ms. Lettie E. Neher
Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
l)-(J i'_i, ~) () ~~
"'1"-"-
( :. (\"\,
RE: Architectural Review Board
Dear Ms. Neher:
As I mentioned to you in our telephone conversation last
week, I very much would like to be considered by the Board of
Supervisors when they choose to fill the vacaa~y on the
Architectural Review Board caused by the rec~ resignation of
Ms. Patricia Bower. Since I have not heard further from you, I
assume that you were able to find the application and resume'
that I submitted last year for consideration.
On checking my own files, I noticed that the resume'
submitted with the previous application was a bit out of date. I
have amended it, and enclose a new copy with a revised
application. I would appreciate it if you would replace the
previous application with the enclosed one, and let me know when
the Supervisors might be considering this matter. I thank you in
advance for you consideration. I remain;
Sincerely yours,
ilJL
William A. Edgerton, AlA
cc: Members of Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County
FAX # (804) 977-5579
Route 5, Box #413, Charlottesville, VA 22901
. .
,-"
~\''<
00
C;
OF ALB121\1
~~(~
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee
A Hr.HT'I'e'C'rTT"R,A 1\PF1!IEW ~OA.lil)
Applicant's Name
WILLIAM A. EDGERTON, A.I.A.
Home Address
RT. 5, BOX #413, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA. 22901
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located JACK JOUETT
Business Address
RT. 5, BOX 1/413, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA.
Phone 2915-5200
Employer
SELF
Occupation/Title
ARCHiTECT
Date of Employment
1981 - PRESENT
Birthdate/Place 9-29-48 BALTIMORE
Years Resident of Albemarle County
12 Previous Residence BALTIMORE. MD
Spouse's Name
LIZA TODD EDGERTON
Number of Children
2
Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates)
B.A. - UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA 1972
MASTERS - ARCHITECTURE -UNIVERSITY OEVIRGINIA.1976' .
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
SEE ATTACHED RESUME'
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
SEE ATTACHED RESUME'
~
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee
A DEEP DESIRE TO USE MY PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AS AN ARCHITECT
IN THE SERVICE OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY.
The information provided on this application will be released to the
public upon request.
~~
1-7-92
DATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle-
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 2290l-4596
Phone: 296-5843
William A Edgerton ALA
& Associates
804-295-5200
804-295-3146
Architects - Planners
WILLIAM A. EDGERTON, AlA
PRESIDENT
WILLIAM A. EDGERTON, AlA & ASSOCIATES
Education:
Master of Architecture, University of Virginia 1976
Bachelors of Arts, University of Virginia 1972
Professional Registration and Affiliations:
-Registered Architect in Virginia (#4497)
-Registered Architect in Maryland (#4029-a)
-Certificate Holder of National Council of Architectural
Registration Boards (#22389)
-Corporate Member of American Institute of Architects
-Member of Board of Directors of the Virginia Society of
Architects
-Past President of the James River Chapter of the
American Institute of Architects
-Member of Board of Directors of James River Chapter
of the American Institute of Architects
-Past President and Member of the Charlottesville/
Albemarle Section of the American Institute of
Architects
-Member of the National Trust for Historic Preservation
-Licensed Real Estate Salesperson with the Virginia
Real Estate Board (#100554)
-Member, Charlotteville Association of Realtors
-Member, Charlottesville-Albemarle Chamber of Commerce
-Member, 5 CIS Committee
-Associate Member, Blue Ridge Home Builder's Association
Professional Experience:
-1981-present, President, William A. Edgerton, AlA &
Associates, Charlottesville, Va.
-1978-1981 Partner, Heyward, Llorens & Edgerton
Charlottesville, Va.
-1976-1978 Architectural Designer, Edmunds & Hyde, Inc.
Baltimore, Md.
-1974-1976 Apprentice, Baker, Heyward & Llorens,
Charlottesville, Va.
-1972-1973 Apprentice, Earl Flansburgh & Associates
Cambridge, Mass.
-Summer 1971 Office Boy, Sert, Jackson & Associates
Cambridge, Mass.
FAX # (804) 977-5579
Route 5, Box #413, Charlottesville, VA 22901
~l.
William A. Edgerton, AlA
Page -2-
Professional References:
Henderson Heyward, AlA
111 West High Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
M. Jack Rinehart, FAIA
407 Water Street
Charlottesville. Virginia
Bryden B. Hyde, FAIA
Edmunds & Hyde, Inc.
1025 St. Paul Street
Baltimore, Maryland
W. McNeil Baker, AIA
Edmunds & Hyde, Inc.
1025 St. Paul Street
Baltimore, Maryland
Teaching Experience:
Introduction to Passive Solar Design and Construction
School of Continuing Education
University of Virginia
Spring Semester, 1982
Other Organizations:
-Member, Piedmont Environmental Council
-Member, Citizens for Albemarle
-Member, Bayly Museum
-Trustee of W. Alton Jones Foundation, Inc.
-Member of the North Elba Historical Society
-Life Member of the University of Virginia Alumni
Association
-Member of Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity
-Member of the Virginia Student Aid Foundation
-Member of All Saints Club, St.Anne's-Belfield School
I'
William A. Edgerton, AlA
Page -3-
Other Organizations Continued:
-Vice-President of Lakewood Properties, Incorporated
-Vice-President of Boulderwood Farms, Incorporated
-Vice-President of Knollwood Properties, Incorporated
-Life Member, Federation of American Scientists
-Member of Board of Governors, Farmington Hunt Club
Social Organizations:
-Farmington Hunt Club
-Farmington Country Club
"
~\"~
00
C;
OF AL8E21\1
.-<1~(~
"
":';
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
, ,
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
. ., ,~.. c.:
, ,~) ---' ',,'
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee ARCHITECTURAL REVIEl.J BOARD
Applicant's Name ALICE PAGE POOL
Home Address RT. 1, BOX 191-A, FREE UNION, VIRGINIA 22940
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located
J.siness Address 1103 Rosehill Dr., Charlottesville. VA 22901
Phone 29'1-'1411
Employer American Red Cross
Occupation/Title Health Historian
..
Date of Employment December 12, 1991
Birthdate/Place 06/19/55, Albemarle,Co.
Years Resident of Albemarle countyrOn~ Previ~us Residenc~ Fairfax, VA; 3 yrs.
~~rty years ~n Charlottesv~lle :
Spouse 1 s Name David 1. Young Number of Children 0
Education (Degrees ari~ Graduation Dates) #B~A., Sociology, 1977; M.L-A., Landscape
.. .
Architecture, 1988; studied Horticulture, 1983-1985, no degree
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
Pi Alpha Xi, an honor sQciety for horticulturists
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
'Member of SeirraClub
':'+:';:":', ;
Peason(s) for Dcsire to SC1'VC' on This Boal'ci/Cornmission/CorrlJ1littec
Having lived in Charlottesville and Albemarle County for most of my life I care deeply about
the employment base, environmental integrity, and appearance of the county.
We must balance the immediate needs of the county with a long term view for the
qualIty at lIte in the area.
The information provided on this application will be released to the
public upon request.
~u,y"', 30blgCZZ-
ATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229a.1r4596
p",
Phone:
296-5843.
-.
-'.
~~'l
OU
()
OF
C"u i\ '"T"'./ ("'\r- , '
'-' I~ i. t ,-,.. /;'L.o!:""'A~lE-
-:""\ '. .. '-'<.-1\.1, l"{
~rl' r;-="!: 0 ~;:; ~- p ,-, ....
..1.."._,......_...... ". .1... .. _.JI~
i I)," ......_"~..,.,. II
- , \, i
, ," I \ 'J " .' , I I 1
, \ ' ,\ . ','I .."',....,,) ! ,
I . ,.. ' . .,. ". I .,
!"\... '.. .c. J;/"
I' .__ . I
t, , ' ,'~.. J '
tt.- ~..' .~-- ~ ......" '_.. ~ -. ~~~ ,i.
C,{.,-~~ ,~".~, ._~:... ~'._~-~ '..:' ~.. ~: i..:i
dVJ~"'.. , · ,- .,,' .....,....,-'(1 -
.-. '-- I .'. -.-... '....'O~)S.
',,",. ;".I'l .....,.r.,;..,..; ~i"
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
(Please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee -:PUBLIC. fFC.~EATlott..JI1L rl1C.ll..l T /.::<5 flu TrioR / T'/
Applicant's Name :r" kJJ
/.,v F<:.. LE'I
,
~ fa ~ '0'- l/
/
Home Address I '{!/.II/ Q ef"S T " Rr L./ 8D/\ 2.2 7-
C 17'/ J.J 'Ie I
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located tl~ANN~
1:3usiness Address 122(, 1I1'lK"lfr5 57. C'f!ff? {()f(;;-s Ii I'-l-':;: l/.4 Phone J'13 -73 $-7
/ (' iCe +I/U:b)
Employer G Ij"'/7C/V /' 0vli7T 'Y1 c. lR!;:{I/?~i)) Occupation/Title Cft/3/fI}(;T;11I41('zR..
, / '
..
Date of Employment
/979 - /9'7/
Birthdate/Place 07/~V5/ C~Je~~~~
Years Resident of Albemarle County /~
Previous Residence r=-/.....I~AiI1/r1 C!o
Spouse I S Name }J;qU(.4 L. {).,('o.u 'oiL)
Number of Children
o
Education (Degrees arid Graduation Dates)
8 fl
UP.2 - (!. J-l A rf-'L
NIL L
/'
)>H yL.:. i c.. /t t... r;: l) ./1:.. A T I" It..) m A3 D e
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups
G ,:; Iv F f: '1 L
J1 Lum /VI
/J j .5 0 C ,,~ T /() .'\.
,.
UIU(-Cti ,
Public, Civic and Charitable Offices and/or Other Activities or Interests
::5 To A.) 'I
Po'ItJT
R. V~I illlJ C!.. L v/3 -17j~ r!(CS ./1)6" /uT
- 130. Q /" DiRtC70RS 5' y/'s
STolv'v POllvT l~/. fltf~ ('0.
,
d?:> j), 0 r b ,,?{Z cT 0 t'?S
/'19C - 7/
E Lp:;,c... TroN ..JFFI C Ilk
.6ToA,'/ ;:::'0111../ {. /::Jtr12{! //1/ c r
.y ylf'5 '
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on This Board/Commission/Committee
W()JLU
LI J(,&;
7D :pe{;s~re() G
o P€ t<J '5P/10& t,;1k/i)
hJ~ Pu P.(....;~
RC:~RF ~/;"-,/1t.- V5tE LJliIi""R€t/€te
:;>055.113 L.t.:
/
tu pJ LJ:; /VO T
n /J ;;;- Ii? 13 () R.b DlUilV (7
T r9 Y PItY/5 R5
,
oR. PAtet'J.1FR..S.
,.
The information provided on this application will be released to the
public upon request.
J~k'j~/
- GNATURY
//30/72
DATE
Return to: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229a.1r4596
_.
Phone: 296-584~
-.