Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201400095 Application 2014-07-23 'w fir+✓ OF (61k N • Architectural Review Board Final Review of a Site Development Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist Part A: Applicant,Contact and Parcel Information Project Name: Faith Christian Center International Tax map and parcel(s): 7$-47A Physical street address: 2184 Richmond Road Contact Person: Brian P. Smith, PE Business Name: Civil Engineering, Inc. Address 4835 Three Chopt Road city Troy State VA zip 22974 Daytime Phone(434 296-3644 Fax#( ) E-mail bpspe@embarqmail.com Part B: Submittal Requirements Important:Submittal packages must contain 8 collated copies of all information unless otherwise indicated. A. Written description of the proposal • Provide a description of the proposal. Identify changes from the preliminary submittal. Indicate specifically how each ARB comment from the preliminary review has been addressed. If there are no changes proposed,then explain why. ® Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor. B. Site plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20',clearly legible and folded): © Location(s)of proposed building(s)on the site. ® Location of proposed parking,travelways,walkways and other improvements. ® Mechanical equipment, trash containers, loading and service areas, other similar features and improvements, and associated screening. ® Existing and proposed topography drawn with contour intervals of 5-feet or less, and with sufficient off-site topography to describe prominent and pertinent off-site features and physical characteristics, but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site. (waived by engineering) ® Location and size of existing and proposed utilities and easements. Identify type of utility and extent of easement. (some recorded easements don't indicate a width) © Stormwater management plan. ® Location of retaining walls indicating top and bottom elevations, maximum wall height, and proposed materials,with material and color samples. ® Sheet number,total number of sheets, date of the drawing, date and description of the latest revision,and contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings. For revised drawings,clearly identify revisions made. 1 OVER—+ Now ,4essoi • C. Landscape plan showing the following(drawn to the scale of 1"=20'or larger,clearly legible and folded): © Proposed landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the ARB guidelines. ® Existing landscaping to be removed. Include the location, size, and species. ® L• andscape key including all landscape symbols and a description of what they represent. ® L• ocation of existing and proposed tree lines and tree save areas. ® L• ocation of existing natural features. n/a ❑ Location of individual trees of 6-inch caliper or greater and all significant groups of trees indicated by botanical name and caliper. • Location and height of above-ground utilities and associated easements, and location of below- ground utilities and associated easements. ® Stormwater facilities. ® Provide a signed,tree conservation checklist with all checklist items drawn on the landscape plans. © Include tree protection fencing and limits of work on the landscape, grading and E&S plans. D. Lighting plan showing the following(drawn to the scale of 1"=20'or larger,clearly legible and folded): ® L• ocation of all proposed building and site lighting. © Lighting schedule identifying all proposed light fixtures, poles and brackets. © Manufacturer's cut sheets illustrating proposed lighting fixtures and information on illumination type, intensity, style, shielding, color,finish, and installation height. © Photometric plan addressing all fixtures and indicating that lighting does meet the requirements of Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. K] Coordination of lighting with landscaping and other site elements. E. Appearance of the building(s)(architectural elevations,color perspective sketches,site sections): ® Dimensioned architectural elevations of the proposed building(s). Elevations must be drawn to the scale of 1/8"=1'-0". Include a building materials schedule and key on the elevation drawings. Submittal of elevations that are not visible from the Entrance Corridor may be required to clarify the overall building design. © Color perspective sketches that show the proposed development as seen from the Entrance Corridor. © Site sections that clarify proposed changes in topography and illustrate the visibility of the proposed development from the Entrance Corridor. Site sections shall indicate the finish floor elevation(s) and roof height(s)relative to the natural elevations along the Entrance Corridor. ® One set of all building materials/colors. ® A floor plan adequate to show exterior walls, windows and doors. F. Additional material ® Provide labeled, color, 8-'/" x 11" photographs of the site as seen from both directions on the Entrance Corridor. ® Any additional material that is necessary to address comments made by the ARB at the preliminary review with a memo itemizing how each of the preliminary comments have been addressed. ❑ The applicant is welcome to submit any additional material that will make the final site development review more productive. Drawings or other submittal items that clarify topography, visibility, utilities, landscaping, or other unique or unusual conditions are welcome. 2 OVER- °...r Novo' s�? 5i ,o ,„. y .a s Applicant must read and sign • Each application package must contain (8) folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only (1) set of building material samples is required. All submittal items, including building material samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate copies of all submittal items in their own files. • All information in this checklist is required, unless specifically waived by the ARB, prior to processing a final site development plan review by the ARB. Additional submittal materials may be required, depending on the proposal. • Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not complete without this checklist, completed, signed, and included with the required submittal materials indicated on the checklist. In representing the above referenced firm submitting this application for review, I hereby state that the information provided in this application, and all accompanying information, is accurate, true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached plans contain all information required by this checklist. July 23, 2014 Signature o perso completing checklist Date Brian P. Smith, PE 434.296.3644 Printed Name/Title Daytime phone number of Signatory County of Albemarle Department of Planning and Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (434)296-5832 Tel, (434) 972-4126 Fax www.albemarle.orq 3 OVER BRIAN P. SMITH, FIEF' '""', CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC 4835 THREE CHOFF ROAD TROY,VA 22974 434.296.3644 bpspe(c�einbargrnail.coni July 23, 2014 Margaret Maliszewski County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: Faith Christian Center International ARB Certificate of Appropriateness Response letter Dear Margaret, Please find attached the ARB package for the Faith Christian Center International. Below I will address the checklist items and your July 11, 2014 comments. Description of Proposal: The congregation of Faith Christian Center International proposes to construct a 2-story, 18,875 square foot multi-purpose building containing a 399 seat sanctuary, administrative offices and classrooms on a parcel located on the north side of Route 250E, approximately 500' southeast of the I-64/Route 250E interchange. The proposed building will have an ultimate 88' x 205' footprint and will be located approximately 575' northeast of, and 46' higher than,the adjacent Route 250E Entrance Corridor. The south side of the building is slightly angled from the EC. Because of budget constraints, at this time the rear 50-feet of the building will not be built. Maybe this will be constructed at some time in the future. To address the compatibility, I think the entrance rendering addresses this best. Please see sheet 6. Similar rolling terrain, wooded areas and entrances can be found all along the 250 entrance corridor. Changes from the preliminary submittal: It has been quite some time since our last ARB submittal to the county but I'll do my best to outline the changes since the preliminary submittal. Comments from the architect and the landscape architect have been integrated into this memo. 1. We are now working with field run 2-foot contours that are tied to the boundary. GOLF COURSE DESIGN • ENGINEERING • SITE DESIGN • LAND PLANNING Margaret Maliszewski July 23, 2014 ..� Page 2 2. We have made numerous iterations to balance the cut and fill in attend to avoid any material being hauled to or from the site. 3. The building footprint has been adjusted to the dimensions noted above. This is narrower and longer than the previous submittal. 4. The stormwater concept hasn't changed in final design except the level spreaders were not needed as the velocities were not nearly as high as I had originally guessed. We still have the customary outlet protection stone though. 5. Also,we have adjusted the location of the entrance to the south parking lot to create better traffic flow into this small lot. This introduced another planting island. How each initial review comment was addressed (letter from Margaret dated July 11, 2014): 1. The service drive to the septic fields has been eliminated. 2. Mass plantings of smaller evergreen trees is being proposed for the slopes that are likely visible from the EC. These smaller trees will require little to no maintenance, which will eliminate the need for regular manual or mechanical access over the sensitive slope areas. 3. The stream buffer mitigation plan involves the review of the engineering department. We have just received approval to proceed with the final design which will include the mitigation plan. However, mitigation for the ARB review has been addressed on sheet L5.0. Also,the upper septic field was adjusted slightly to the east to assure the western 20-foot undisturbed buffer is not touched. 4. The entrance culvert has been lengthened (and lowered) so the outlet is hidden below the fill for the right turn taper(at the toe of the slope). Four low-growing, evergreen shrubs have been specified for each end of the culvert. A cluster of plantings are shown between the outlet of the next outlet pipe and Route 250. This outlet is also sunk into the ground by about 5-feet. 5. The county's standard mechanical note has been added to the site (C 1.0)and architects (sheet 12)plans. The units will likely be on the back side of the building. 6. The photometric plan for the entrance and parking lots has been enlarged and a cut sheet of lighting equipment has been added. The maximum fc is at the entrance property line. It is 0.3 fc. 7. The preliminary approval note has been removed. 8. The tree line along Route 250 is better defined on all sheets. 9. We asked the surveyor to re-visit the deed room to double check existing easements on the property.No additional information was found. However, with regard to the proposed landscaping,we have assumed a typical 20-foot easement centered on the overhead utilities. 10. I spoke with Dennis Seale (Troy Austin was on vacation)with VDOT yesterday. They are fine with the proposed entrance grading and low-growing junipers around each end section if that is what the county is looking for. I'll forward his email to you when it comes in. BRIAN P. SMITH , PE GOLF COURSE DESIGN • ENGINEERING • SITE DESIGN • LAND PLANNING Margaret Maliszewski July 23, 2014 ..r Page 3 11. Plant selections now reflect largely native species planted in a random arrangement except those street trees planted parallel to Route 250, which are now 35' O.C. and called out to be larger diameter. Planting respect utility easements. 12. Significant plantings are now proposed along the entrance drive. Rather than a regimented arrangement,they are planted in a mixed-species random fashion in an effort to better integrate the manmade improvements into a natural-like landscape. 13. Perimeter sidewalks have been deleted and in lieu of these improvements parking lot shade tree plantings now occur. Special attention has been given to the southern parking lot, where, in addition to the shade trees, an evergreen shrub screen and supplemental slope plantings of evergreen trees are proposed. The additional plantings suggested along the entrance drive serve to reinforce the screening effect of the parking lot. 14. The county's standard planting note has been added. 15. All plans are now better coordinated. 16. The items on the conservation checklist have been added to the plan. The tree protection fence is labeled as a safety fence (either a silt fence on the low areas or an orange vinyl fence elsewhere). These fences will encompass the limits of clearing and grading. Thank you very much. As always, if you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 4e4A4 Brian P. Smith, PE President Cc: Wayne Frye, Pastor Enclosures (8 sets) Account ID:06-012-06/Margaret Maliszewski 1 BRIAN P. SMITH , PE GOLF COURSE DESIGN • ENGINEERING • SITE DESIGN • LAND PLANNING w 11 / k I1 i 1 II I / . • ? 'f / I I r / / * fi • tz t 4 . , _ 41_,,,, . 77:17..:--2.-1 . 1 e . Oil ',‘'.-.... ''"''''':.-: . . 3 .il .. .may.: ` ! -4 C r s l ... 1 , MM _, ■ •....;flit!....... . . ,.10,V.'",-.•' *. .. . --- ---e•....-,;.*. ' ..411t:- , ' ' 4111,1107:14figi- :-' -' iirdneArtati. ;AV' ,,sz_-..,;•. ....,,it , - ; or,' ,.-,.„,...4.-- - 'wow ..•••"75e•t•rsr, 09r- tfo...f. -•0 0 ''.* 1.'...*--.-.'" --1/2 '; -''•'"' ../ ' -- "•'.1,1••?`,g, '1 :,.., *1"•... 4 ' ie - , t•'`.... - .t - . . •, , -Iir ,. (-:,•• -- - -...."-.,. ,.•,1/4 , " . ,..". ,....:,.., _40T -,:-.:-..1'. ,, 'A4k4,1. ,4.:-Qk --,,,-/ 4 s--.;--**,,,,i0,‘,..: • ,- -.:. t7,'' •i/,, " `04 • -.,,,---.-: - i , . - 2 i- r... . 1 t - _ ,- -4-.. - , J - - •. _ - -_ - ' atm • . -. _,, N i'''' ;• \ \\\ , 1 ^ •.7: .. . , . - '„.-..,'-.4.f.--.', :1.g..--.z. 1. 4", •...:--; • -. _ .,. .- gef---r:-..-,-.. -1,-z---,.4.",.. ■ , .: '•..,,,,,„,ne.'t.,....,- , ;ffe"=: -: 4 ' 4 -", -• . 0.4 "7. l''', . ■,. —.. , . • : I .. . .\\ .. , .--,....:.... ....., .......ii.,:v. - . .,.. -,..:. ■ N wr • , 3 z Q 1- ui E - U a) V Cr fa CL 1.13 CU Co N N C a) CO RI ,.1 �"' -�-' p N a) E N o o c a N C C 'O O p = N c 0) 0 O p C 0) U) n C a) U '" CL u) N C "a E 'ry o 0 C 1 + V O1 C ~ C f r6 LO O _co — Ecn — a § N CO d' a) " 3 -0 C = W 400 C .....>- f0 .3 = 2 cn To v) CT C a) >' E c L . ° ate A to L , r0 C C a) p O1 CU a) V .E, E 01 al 0 c > L ~ C rp i C CO t rB O i C +-1 N N a (A - �, la j O U) r0 (a0 >` ( ) U IA O a (0 _C C � Q C C. 0 a ^ ) U r0 .� a) E -C a V O " O = :4--i a"C..+ Q) i0 c� W i d c - C ro . p .. O O —� L >, O o 3 E is +z a) -0 -v L V) L _ i Cl) c a' .O°-C o v n: cu 0 ._, a� V L. °U co v CO a) ar 1 C Gd E5C i L 1 O U can' rn -C Oa Q >. F. C a 3 0 a V) N ate+ > f0 .o o -p w O 'a 0 c, V O C p .- 0 v _ (n U E N C C _ N c0 A o ° — O C S .vi j In r0 Q. 4_, N .'O t ,--i 3 CU i z r. C W O O +� ^ >` O �> N h. LV 0 oC m y CEc mac' c000 E N pou _ ji .. _ L E VI a--1 Ri i Q F- Q Q N p ;�-' - H IX) 0 ^ C O N -C., (CO 'c` II i i r, -° cn L 3 C C . �, C N O cn o° .c LF. o r0 c En O � C 0 00 -a � F- v y r C: V) U F- I- o 5 F- 0 W > V) A A A A aC) A A q G. isorrie Sri Y C 7 U A 4 O ? 0 L , O 1 C na 'o C ' U C UJ 0N � � 1": Urnkocvna i b. O NM 01 -fl tE C CU N I E N l CL m I-> U i L Ls W �\ N N M T- 0.. j O M O A A A A A A A A N Albemarle tslYernty Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596 St u Planning Application :(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)972-4126 'PARCEL/ OWNER INFORMATION TMP 07800-00-00-047A0 Owner(s): FAITH CHRISTIAN CENTER INTERNATIONAL INC Application # ARB201400095 PROPERTY INFORMATION Legal Description ACREAGE SLEEPY HOLLOW TRAILER PARK Magisterial Dist. Scottsville Land Use Primary Residential -- Mobile home Current AFD Not in A/F District Current Zoning Primary Rural Areas APPLICATION INFORMATION Street Address 2184 RICHMOND RD CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22911 Entered By Judy Martin Application Type Architectural Review Board 107/22/2014 Project Faith Christian Center International - Final Received Date '07/21/14 Received Date Final Submittal Date 07/21/14 Total Fees 1000 Closing File Date Submittal Date Final Total Paid 1000 Revision Number Comments Legal Ad SUB APPLICATION(s) Type Sub Applicati f Comment•Final Site Development plan:: 1:::::: :' :!.: ::: .. .,..•. 'APPLICANT/ CONTACT INFORMATION ContactType, 1 Name Address Ci State I Zip I Phone 1 PhoneCell Owner/Applicant':.1FAITH; CHRISTIAN CENTER;INTERNAUO •. .P'0&JX 2306 €:CHARtOTTESVILL.122902 Primary Contact BRIAN P.SMITH, PE/CIVIL ENG.INC. 4835 THREE CHOPT ROAD TROY,VA. 22974 4342963644 Signature of Contractor or Authorized Agent Date ArchitecturalIeview Board Application `'�T. Part A: Applicant,Contact and Parcel Information Project Name: Faith Christian Center International Tax map and parcel(s): 78-47A Physical Street Address: 2184 Richmond Road Contact Person: Brian P. Smith, PE Business Name: Civil Engineering, Inc. Address 4835 Three Chopt Road City Troy State VA zip 22974 Daytime Phone(434)296.3644 Fax#( ) E-mail bpspe@embarqmail.com Owner of Record: Faith Christian Center International Address P.O. Box 2306 City Charlottesville State VA Zip 22902 Daytime Phone(434 979.1700 Fax#(434 979.1702 E-mail pastor@fccintl.org Part B: Review Type and Fee Select review type Review by the Architectural Review Board Conceptual Plan/Advisory Review(for a Special Use Permit or a Rezoning) No Fee Preliminary Review of a Site Development Plan No Fee X Final Review of a Site Development Plan $1000.00 Amendment to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness $225.00 Building Permit Review $590.00 County-wide Certificate of Appropriateness Structures 750'or more from the EC,no taller than 5 stories No Fee Structures located behind a structure that fronts the EC No Fee Personal wireless service facilities No Fee Fencing or Equipment or Lighting No Fee Additions to ARB-approved buildings No Fee Minor amendments to site or architectural plans No Fee Building permits where the change is 50%or less of the altered elevation No Fee NOTE: For SIGNS, use the combined APPLICATION AND CHEKLIST FOR SIGNS. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP# ARB# Fee Amount Si,0C:) Date Paid q,L I'14 By who? �" Y 1 Receipt Cj(D eCheck# (C) 1 By 1 Y' „"e J C i�_&h tin n 4C Ln .rnrl�,z c County of Albemarle Dept of Community Development,401 McIntire Rd,Charlottesville,VA 22902 Voice:(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)972-4126 11/2010 Page 1 of 2 OVER—a mss` awe, yr Part C: Description of Proposal Describe your proposal.Attach a separate sheet if necessary. The congregation of Faith Christian Center International proposes to construct a 2-story, 18,875 square foot multi-purpose building containing a 399 seat sanctuary, administrative offices arid classrooms on a parcel located on the north side of Route 250E, approximately 500' southeast of the I-64/Route 950E interchange. Part D: Applicant Agreement Applicant must read and sign • Each application package must contain(8)folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only (1)set of building material samples is required. All submittal items, including building material samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate copies of all submittal items in their own files. • Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not complete without the appropriate checklist, completed, signed, and included with the required submittal materials indicated on the checklist. I hereby certify that I own the subject property or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application. *See submittal requirements below. I also certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate,true, and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached plans co tain all information required by the appropriate checklist. • tom July 21, 2014 Signature of o Mr er's err entative Date or contract purchaser Wayne A. Frye, Pastor 434.979.1700 Printed name,Title Daytime phone number of Signatory *Ownership Information: • If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not limited to,the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing above has the authority to do so. • If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application. • If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.Attach the owner's written consent. 11/2010 Page 2 of 2 OVER—+ Now BRIAN P. SMITH, PE ..r ..s CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC 4835 THREE CHOFT ROAD TROY,VA 22974 434.296.3644 bpspenernbargrnail.com July 21, 2014 Margaret Maliszewski County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: Faith Christian Center International ARB Certificate of Appropriateness Application Dear Margaret, Please find attached two (2) sets of the ARB package for the Faith Christian Center International, a signed COA application along with a$1,000.00 check from the church. Some minor coordination changes between disciplines are necessary as we didn't have enough time to meet the county's submittal deadline. We have extended the entrance culvert on the downstream side so that it is hidden at the toe of the right turn taper slope. The landscape architect has also added some very low plantings at both ends to better conceal the end sections of the pipe. Also,we have adjusted the location of the entrance to the south parking lot to create better traffic flow and introduced another planting island. You will see this on the site and landscape plan. We didn't have time to change the architect's renderings but will get an update by the end of this week. You will notice the architect's plans show a building that is fifty feet shorter than the site plan. This rear portion of the building will not be constructed at this time. Recent budget numbers for the project have indicated a higher cost than anticipated. Thank you very much. As always,if you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Brian P. Smith, PE President Cc: Wayne Frye, Pastor Enclosures (2 sets) Account ID:06-012-06/Margaret Maliszewski 2 GOLF COURSE DESIGN • ENGINEERING • SITE DESIGN • LAND PLANNING Margaret Maliszewsk' July 21, 2014 " `'' Page 2 Here are some contacts for your reference. In addition to me, the design team comprises of several organizations. They are as follows. 1. Architect- Jim Sherrer or Trevor Cundiff Design Development Architects 800 Salem Woods Drive, Suite 102 Raleigh,NC 27615 919.848.4474 trevorc @designdevelopment.com 2. Landscape Architect-Mark Keller, LA Terra Concepts, PC 2046 Rock Quarry Road Louisa,VA 23093 434.531.3600 mkel ler @terraconceptspc.c om 3. Structural Engineer- Stephen Barber, PE DMWPV 110 Third Street,NE Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.293.5171 sbarber @dmwpv.com 4. Septic Engineer- Michael Craun, PE Old Dominion Engineering 2036 Forest Drive Waynesboro, VA 22980 540.942.5600 olddomeng @ntelos.net BRIAN P. SMITH , PE GOLF COURSE DESIGN • ENGINEERING • SITE DESIGN • LAND PLANNING