The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-03-11 FIN A L March 11, 1992 Room 7, County Office Building 5: 00 p. m., Adjourned from March 4, 1992 1) Call to Order. 2) Work Session: Economic and Fiscal Policies Related to Industrial Development. 3) Adjourn. 7: 00 p. m., ReltUlar MeetinJ?: 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) *Consent Agenda (on back of sheet). 6) Public Hearing on proposed 1992-93 County Budget. 7) Public Hearing: To amend the Comprehensive Plan to add an Open Space and Critical Resource Plan. t:o-gti:i:d.e-e:ffel'ts-t:o-~le.ft -fel'-afta -~I'eteet e~eft -s~aee-ift -the-€el1ftty-ift -a-eem~l'ehefts:tve-afta -iftte".atea -:fashieft ':' (Defer to a work session on April 1, 1992, and then reschedule for public hearing.) 8) Letter dated February 26, 1992, from J. Granger Macfarlane, Chairman, Governor's Advisory Commission on the Dillon Rule and Local Govern- ment, announcing a meeting and hearing schedule (Deferred from March 4, 1992). 9) Sale of McIntire School Property to McIntire Land Trust (from March 4, 1992). 10) Update: Scottsville Boundary Line Adjustment. 11) Scottsville Tour - Board has been invited to tour the area under consid- eration for boundary adjustment by the Town of Scottsville (from March 4, 1992). 12) Moving of CSX Transportation Agency at Charlottesville, Virginia, and the Stations Under its Jurisdiction to the Richmond, Virginia, Transpor- tation Service Center (from March 4, 1992). 13) Statement for 1992 Spring Preallocation Hearings for the Interstate, Primary and Urban Systems. 14) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 15) Adjourn to March 13, 1992, at 12:30 P.M. for a luncheon meeting with City Council in Rooms 5/6. CON S E N T AGE N D A FOR INFORMATION: 5.1 Letter dated February 24, 1992, from Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Transportation, re: Addition of Wingate Farm to the State Secondary System of Highways. David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Edward H. Bain, Jr. Samuel Miller Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall MEMORANDUM TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community Development FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~ DATE: March 12, 1992 SUBJECT: Board Actions of March 11, 1992 At the Board of Supervisors' meeting held on March 11, 1992, the following actions were taken: Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. Staff has been requested to look centers and Home Occupation-Class B. based on an average. at the new cost of permits for day care It was mentioned that the new cost was The staff is to investigate whether the Board has any authority over where cigarette vending machines are placed or how they are regulated. Agenda Item No.7. Public Hearing: To amend the Comprehensive Plan to add an Open Space and Critical Resource Plan. to guide efforts to plan for and protect open space in the County in a comprehensive and integrated fashion. DEFERRED to April 1, 1992, for a work session. The public hearing will be rescheduled later. Agenda Item No.8. Letter dated February 26, 1992, from J. Granger Macfarlane, Chairman, Governor's Advisory Commission on the Dillon Rule and Local Government, announcing a meeting and hearing schedule. DEFERRED to April 1, 1992, for additional staff work. Memo To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. v. Wayne Cilimberg March 12, 1992 Date: Page 2 Agenda Item No.9. Sale of McIntire School Property to McIntire Land Trust. DEFERRED to April 1, 1992. Agenda Item No. 10. Update: Scottsville Boundary Line Adjustment. Agenda Item No. 11. Scottsville Tour - Board has been invited to tour the area under consideration for boundary adjustment by the Town of Scottsville. Mrs. Humphris needs answers to questions raised during last year about this proposal before the next discussion. The Board will tour Scottsville on the afternoon of April 1, 1992. Agenda Item No. 13. Statement for 1992 Spring Preallocation Hearings for the Interstate, Primary and Urban Systems. Draft statement needs a couple of typographical corrections. Find out who will speak first at the hearing, so that the people attending will know what time they should be there. Mr. Bain wanted information on vehicle counts on major routes and the nature of the traffic. Agenda Item No. 14. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign a deed of conveyance and plat for property on Berkmar Drive. The Clerk will advertise for an appointee from the business community for the Architectural Review Board. Interviews to be held on May 6. Mr. Martin requests that meetings which involve the general public be scheduled for later afternoon or evening hours. Mr. Bowerman asked for a report as to who maintains the Hillsdale Detention Basin. Staff is to draft an answer to the letter from the Montvue Citizens Associ- ation. Note that the Board has never said that Alternative 10 is necessary and has never made a decision on the alignment. Draft letter should be sent back to the full Board before the Chairman signs. Mr. Marshall announced that he had set up a meeting with Carole Hastings and representatives from Blue Cross/Blue Shield to see if the County is getting what it pays for. It was announced that Mr. Larry Fromme will be in Charlottesville on March 18 and will meet with Tucker, Bowerman, Edwards and Hendrix. A tour of indus- trially zoned properties will not take place until late April. Memo To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg March 12, 1992 Date: Page 3 Agenda Item No. 15. Adjourned to March 13, 1992, at 12:30 P.M. for a luncheon meeting with City Council in Rooms 5/6. LEN:mms cc: Robert B. Brandenburger Richard E. Huff, II Roxanne White Amelia Patterson Bruce Woodzell George R. St. John File i?c-~//~c/ J>~~7~ ~1an:h 1 (I. 199: To Whom It May Concern. We. the undersigned. support Mike Will iams' effort to: 1. have all cigarette vending machines removed from places that are accessible to minors and 2. encourage vendors to require proof of age before sell ing tobacco products to minors in accordance with state law. Cigarette smoking contributes to most of the deaths attributed to heart disease. If young people can not become addicted to nicotine as teenagers, there is a very good possibility they may not choose to use tobacco products as adults. Sincer~el y, /~ ~/0.NL~~ Health and physical educators, Western Albemarle High School ~. . '-/nu2:';z;;r~ ~~~~~Vz:W{~ j;a..VI..(",- ,-;:..-1Jcc1JJ.C ..c-l ~c~/#r/ .;?-/-::J?J.----- ./"-- ~---....... LESLiE H. WALTON MiddLE SdlOoL RourE 1, Box 200 CHARLoTTEsvillE, ViRGiNiA 22901 (804) 97P761'7 March 9, 1992 Dear Mr. Wi11iams, We strongly agree with your proposal regarding minors and tobacco availability. Sincerely, t:loru(J ~"j a;;!;;;J Diane G. Archer ~~~-SA~ Veronica Price-Thomas ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOLS WE EXPECT SUCCESS G In C o .- .., '" u o ... W l-' <:r: III ~ 3: J tlJ ... o ... III >- r:: ~ ~ 0 co. E tlJ .." 4 I- Ule .- cx.~ o Glt- IaI Qj~ '- = ~ IU:S ;;- t).O.- rJ ~ .- 1ft. g v 1ft g:. z ~ ell - ~ O u -~ U r '0 ~< t ~ -C IIfIIl ~ :g :s v c:;t ~ ~ C <:; ~ ~ <'j In '- o ... o tlJ r:: III ,- ~ E.r:: v 'tl ... ._ ::3 C Co g ~,.. ._ .D ~ 'in r: v U"l .- .2 ~ E III V 0 - ~ ... tlJ . ... tlJ tlJ o C. III ... >- ::3 tJ11-- I T l iij ,... ~ ~ - ~ ;:, l1J - r:: r:: \J tlJ ::3 ~ L - - l l E tlJ ... L '- - - E:!:! 5 cD 'CD - cD o ... v Ci b () u v v ~ 0 c ... " Q () )1:> JD 'J ,) .5[1 \J.J r() J) '-L r.' ~ ,- (Y1 ('l1 fl1 - uJ - - rc o~ u/ g 2 'e ~~z 1-0--" ...> 11100 , 1iJ,: ')~ {3 III r:: 0"" '~ ~ tlJ ~ ::3 III CT'... Z tlJ 0--.. ~,: > ~ 0 0 E Z C 0 tlJ 2 Z .r:: '2 Z ... <l: ,... III tlJ t:z J) '-1 tlJ--.. If} ~> ~ ,/l 00 IV Q) v1 '\j 5h T QI 5~ ~ 'rh .: 0 z v- --.. \. v > ..I ;-- \J ~ "" VI ;- 'u \J ./.... :::> )"" - tlJ 'tl 0 (j llJ \J c ~ f V c.. C 0 +- . - Cl \". j 0 - J "2 ('J L oL . - l... ~ 0 ~ 3- -1) - \.. ~ ( ~ " \.0 ! :.. l: ) ..:{ ~ .::l V) QJ U ~- ... .j I.- L t .9 <... ,,.... 0 c.J V I & QJ IJ1 VJ ' - s c.J ... C QJ - ( iI1 - o 0 u ~ e -' () d - v; 'r; c - ~ C ~:3 ,!::! V ...J -+- u) J - ~ ('J - QJ IJ1 C I) I w VI (f) -0 u IJ1 QJ L. - o I1l > 01. I \.) :c ") ~ (l) I "}- ... \.9 C (fl ::r:. .:!> \.9 II 3 ~ r- :r: tI If) It \.9\.9u -I i N "';1 ~ oil 1 Lril 'tl ~ 0 / <C 0 r- 0 () r ('L ~ IJ) ') rl v- I- e. r<) (( N r- u E <( :r 0 ClI > 0 Vl ~ 0 > co -- -5 ~ ~ L :3 l ,~ C) If) :t tj) -1. .> ~ 0 - - - ~ ~ :1 Q.\ \J/ (tl -cl J lf1 ..c -- J (.) ""l > ,,) 0 ~ Ci J r tV :t 0 ... .3 ~ .9 ~ I1l 0 j Qj ,~ ,s '0 cJ .:l.. ... ~ 0 '0 0 cJ U C ~ Vl I1l u Qj Vl ~ QJ QJ QJ 'e E ... I1l '0 r:: Cl I1l '0 ?: 0 a. z <l: 0 .r:: a. i..: o ,~ E '0 x QJ Vl "0 C I1l QJ oa >- QJ >- <C fl) ~ ~oa C o~~ I1l ,~ ~ ~ ttl C. E~ _:J ~a.~ ~o=~~ o-c~ .r::lDttlOVlL:lO.r:: a.tI:2:x:VI1lCT:>'" tlc:x:tI ~co:J:>o a.lD~tltllttltltl :x:~co..J3o u o I';l ('" ~ '" III ~ ~ c c ~ ~ ~ cu E ~ '" .0 '" E ,- ~ O '" v v v U ~ 0 o Ut C o .- 1.1 ta u o ... '.l.l cl \) (j.. W ~.... '" og .' 'jJ.)'E (j}2 ro z o 00>: d:F; VI .S "'wQj ro j III ==0 .J c 0.... tlJ ',jj ~ '" III 00 o tlJ ro .... ~ III III CT -", Z >-~o, c ~ c> I';l >-._ 't:l 0 E c Q. tlJ E-E Q.I .... ~~ '" .- at~ o cuI- ~> GJI.I 1.= taD DO .- .- '" v '" u.. cu ~ o ~ ~ >CC ~ -c IIpI( ~ ~ C ~ Vi CC ~, j '" .... o tlJ III C III Q.I .- ro t:: z E-S~' 't:l"'ro> .- ::J 00 o a.._ v C QJ ,... o - '" .- .0 0 .....Vi C z t'3 V\ .- "- o tlJ E> _ V III V 0 _ I';l.... tlJ * - '" QJ QJ ~ o a. III 't:l .... >- ~ 0 Vll-_V --cl U - 5") .; v !ll 0:; - - - .- - C - C l. L L -- .. - \ft) CJj -- VI 6) CirtJ 6j d 0 3 0 <J 0 )) 0 J) '--; ."if Jl (l) ,) . r" ('Y j. ~ rf1 rt1 - V) - - - 0 V) 0 () 2 Q) 0 L '2 :/ i'- -z. V1 '1 ~ u V'\ V) V} -. ..... ~ ./ )'" ~) J tIi .:) 5~ II) VI Q) v') VI V) /' QI ~ ~J f:l.I -~ J 5; ) ") <1-1 ..J .J / ~ ~ L9 0 L.. -f () I/) J ~ r ~ \.. <! ~ I :;j. q ;L v ~ () -0 ( e .- (, d. ~ " rL 0 ~ .,...Q - <L. -L " - ~ -0 cJ VI ~ -u -+ - 0 & 0 0 )( - 0 -r ' l. I .., ~ & (l) I 3 CL c .::1 r ... N ,..; -i iii () :n ("") )- <r r- c 0 r ...- d. () If) -:) rl iT l- n <:! c. N) ill N r- cr < T E ~ > 0 0 co rd 0 > ~ ~ ~ --- L 8 J: Vl t}) C} .> <J 0 - - - V1 ~ -c) :L J lfl to J - ~ .J 0 "') > .J 0 J Ci J ~ :t 0 0 ~ w 0 0) .S 0 .-J E t1l L 0 j "- c 3 (J .1.. 0 I1J "6 E ... x 0 ai I1J ... cJ Vl 0 ..11 '0 '0 U c Vl c ... Vl t1l t1l u I1J I1J I1J ~ ~ I1J E ... C I1J '0 '0 ~ 0 ;>--~ t1l ... t1l '0 .c 0 a.. Z <( 0 a.. o 'Z J) ~ >- o o- J') 0) 1 ~ ~ ~ct I1J / 0 <.! I1J Vl ~ ~ 3 0 23 ~ ~ ~ I1J 'u Vl'~C~CD C OUQ.J t1l I1J u C t1l ~ t1l C. Lu 2:' ~ '2 t1l = ... Vl a.. Vl I1JVlI1JEs; -~ 0':':"'- LL~t1l~~o~~~...~o~ A" ...l..:)o.cCD"",OI1Jt1lCJ'::>~ ~ l..:) 1/ ua.. 1/ c::::c a::: CD::i:> 0 i A II V1 II 11 c:( II II II it II ~ [I VJ l..:)l..:)ua..CD~::ca:::CD-l:>O tlJ .'t:l ~ 0 U s '" c o -- 1.1 t\1 u o ..I ~ C -- .c u fa :E DO'" C ~ __ 0 " c c -- cui > 0 cut- *' ~> ell _~ i. - ns .- ,D t).O .- .- '" v '" u.. ell o~ >c:c -0" Z c <<.nct ,.. III ... c: Q) E E o u t: o "0 Q) ... Ill' o.r: 0.<'0 SoE ,- tIC III c: <'0 ,- "0 III c: <'0 Q) ~ > Q) .r: ... c: o Q) ,- o t; ... Q) III ::J :..C' c: Q.I <'0 Q.I '0 ~ ca. E-E Q.I '- ,.. o Q.I III c: III Q.I ._ ~ *'l E .r: ... v Q) "0 '- '- ._ ::J ~ o 0.,- v c: Q.I ,... o - '- '':; :e 0 <'0 III c: V III .- o Q.I E _ V III V 0 _ <'0'" Q) . (; Q.I Q.I "0 ... g; ~ 0 V1....._V Q.I '- o ... III .... o III III Q.I '- '0 '0 <'0 "0 c: <'0 - Q) E <'0 Z - -n ;; ~ ::J ~ - . III III ::J Q.I L c: v ~ ::J c: Q) - Q) '- C 0 .D .... ._ ::J '- v V v v ~ 0 <: 0 ~ g d 1- fYl - ... ::J 0 .D <'0,... '- Q.I 0 c: c: : 'E <'Oz 0"- ...> v1 tIC ~ cJ ii /-- III ,... Q.I tIC <'0 III ..... Z 0...... ,= > 0 E Q.I '2 z 2 v ...... -? > - z ...... /- > -;;r- Q) ~ 0 ...., ~ .- - -u J -+ Q) .... c: j ..J ~ .8 ,2 iJl ... '1: ~~ Q) III - ~ " U iJl J: 0 o III ....() () II II VI ()() - N ,,; Q.I .:i vi "0 0 s:. n ("l V\ - rJ f L ,,,- ~ '-' , 0- 0 - - () r .> .J rY1 o o .s. J if) cJ dl J: -c) J "') o Ci ~ 0 tV ,::; 2 E I';) L 0 '0 Qj c ciJ '6 C) x ,~ .... Q) ... 0 III 0 '0 '0 U I c c ... iJl III I';) U iJl ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) '0' E .... 00 III '0 <t: Cl .... I';) '0 c.. Z <t: 0 r- () r ~ II) ci iT 0- lY) N r- C) <( :r ~ > 0 > 0;) Q) ... ~ l. '" Vl I Ci 0 - J l0 lf1 ,; > J J :t 0 0 cO -> j .:l cJ Qj c ~ 0 U .r: Cl. Q) .... .8 III >- Q) ~ J:' ~ <t: ~Q)u ,~ ~.~ ~.8 ~ ~ E :J III - iJl !l:....~--'" o....~..: cr\jo_vJ..J ~Q) O.r:OJ"'OVl....:JO.r: uc..II~I&cl:1g36 o ~ ~ ~ II II II T, II II o<:IIl::OJ-lSO u (3 II) c o .- 1.1 fa u o ... ell C .- .c u fa I DO'" C .. ._ 0 " c c .- cuI > 0 ~ ~> cu'" ..= ftI .- .D t).() .- .- '" v '" u.. GI o~ >CC "-a B c u)cc iij .... 5l \II \II ::I 41 ... c: v ~ ::I ~ E.8t: E ._ ::I o t; ~ u~o o ... ::I i:2 o /11 ...' '0415 ~c:c: ~ ~'e o.~ c:E~~ .~ 00'" > \II c: 00 /1I:C~ III c: 4i /11 41 \II ~ ::> 41 .r= ... c: 0'" 4J '.J 41 ... III 00 041/11 t:; 5-.~ ;0. .. 0'" Z calc' /11 ;0.'- > '0 0 E o"Q.4J E.r= 41 ... ... .... 041\11 c: \II 41 .- /11 ... Z E'5Q:), '0......> .- ::I S'o C 0.._ v c: 41 ,... .g ;Q 5 /11 \II c: Z u V) .- ........ .!2~E> .!!! ~ B 41 * - ... 41 41 41 00.\11'0 ... ;>. ::I 0 I.n/-_V 41 ... o ... VI "'- o \II \II 41' ... '0 '0 /11 '0 C /11 '"' 41 E /11 Z ",) v :>t> ') \9 I':) ~ ; Z') \.D oJ 1:2 o q- \J1 - <'f \ ~ f3 ~ '>- 2 >- >- 4' CD V\ r.! ~ -- cJ'b IV ~ -u+- 01 J > ~ <..--0 y ( VJ .~ ~:I () 4. ~;l) >- :z >-- >- VI o v r) e u .~ ~ ~ o ~ =: N T ~""'j '1I ,d)' < J -: v .L '.) u- .j E ~ j <l 2: (f- V; j) ~ ~ v ~ m 1-0 ~~ ~j oJ 1 o { ~ -;- ~ v1 q: .3 ...; e -0 ;.- .:r .:i 2- 2 ~ L >- >- Vl o ,;- oJ ('l } +- j e -v )--. :c. ~ ] ~. rJ ('1\ Q () ,- \.: o c E "- o x Q) '" '0 C I1l Q) 00 c.: v .~ '0 c I1l ~ I1l Cl V\ E 0 ~ rd 0 > ~ t- V> C) cJ - --d I J IV ~ .8 ~ L 0 ~~o- ... u Q) '0' \." a.. V E "l Z "'1 o Ci Q) \." o V1 >. ~CQ) ~ ~ .8 ,2 v <( Q)'- c.nJ..,jC:~o.o C ~Q)U ~ r:l ,!!,! u C 11l.8 ~ ~ v ~ c ~ .- ~ ~ - ~ uV1~~~_-~ \.,,~..: o "l C /11 0 - ~... 0 \." Q) ~~o.cl!l~o~:;5-o.s V a.. II c: J: 0:: I!l .- 3: 0 II lJ1 II II c.: II II II II -l II \.?\.?va..I!l~J:O::I!l~3:o Qj '0 o U r- r- If) u 0. ('() N r- u o () ~ rl <( > T o <0 ~ I ~ r:l lJ1 ~ o \fl In - ~ J Q 0:> . .:i.. ~ o v c o .c a.. '" c o (j .- ~ II U o .... ~ c .- .c U " :E 00'" C II. ._ 0 " .5 ~:E >' 0 cu.... ~> ~ .~ II. - 1\1:0 00.- .- '" v u.. o ~ Ucn >CC "" ::s c tnc ~ ,.., ~ '" Vl =' tII .w C V ~ =' ~ E tII '- D '- E ,- =' O ... v v v U Vl 0 tII o .w =' . 0 CD o III ~ '0 tII 0 tII C C ti :2 'E o v o.IIIIIIZ cEo ...... DO .w> 'iii ~ DO III :c ,E Vl c = III tII tII 3 > Vl tII .r::. ... c 0"" tII 'o;j tII ... Vl DO o tII III ... :l Vl '" C".... Z >tII0...... C tII c> III >._ '0 0 E i5 Q. tII Ef tII ... ,... o III '" C '" III .- III ~ Z E .c tII ...... 'O~15> .- :l DO o 0..- v C III ,... 0-'" 'o;j :e 0 Z III ::l,E ...... .2~E> '" v 0 _ III .w ~.OJ cv4i 00."''0 .w>:lO Vl~_v (YJ ..--c;, - - ...., ,-f. u_ & 0 "- -7;1 -+- "I --- /' J1 ..1- '- 1.0 "V ,,; -) '../1 > .~ ~ <( :> <t :) IX) ;? 1"- , \ I , I , I. , \ \ \ \ .\ \ \ 1\ \ 1\\ >- >- >- L '>- 2. 2 2 '>- L >- '>- >- >- '>- I Iv U J u J V'\ 0 :J + ~ rJ.. f )/ j :2 0 I... ~ :3 ',\.I V) ~ -6 v :) is ~ u: e - .J (j a "> .-L ~ rl I-J <0 ('1 ..c::: "2 -; - 1- :r:. t3 cc ') 100. \.\.. :r ~ 01_ J- >- -L - "W' '2 .n -r- ~ I ~, - 1- v.. u! Q) 0 :) () :;: 0 - - ~ - - ~ -- c. CL - - - ~ CL ~ - ., I 1- r ~ .LLl rJ) :3 '--j. r- N m I ~ iii ... r- 0 r () If) 0 ci iT c^ a. r<) N r- . C) ~ a l/) T () <( 2- f ~ > 0 0 CO cd 0 > ~ ~ ~ ~ - L- V) :r rJ if) ct 0 ..> 0 (j ~ - - U1 ~ ~ :1 ~ to W ~ -c) J -- 19 ~ ~ cI:. tJ "') > ,.) 0 ~ ~ Ci J lJJ :t Q t.: lj.. 0 (f:J 0 t.: -> c 2 E 0 ~ . rv :d- e v c () x .g 'E ~ v 0 cJ III 0 '0 '0 U III C .w III V C rv u v v rv v '- c v ~ '0 E '0 ~ 0 rv '0 ..c 00 rv '- z ex:: 0 0.. ex:: 0 0.. v '- o v ti >, ~ '-Cv ~ v u Oou ex:: "" '-Vv ti'~~(?OO )ij 2:;0. ~t;'c~~ ~ ~a.: ~1Il~E~_v~ O-cv o rv c rv Oiij"" III ,-::l o..c l5~81t~~~~~g~o II V) II II ex:: II II II II II :;;. II \D\Duo..aJ~:J:~aJ....J:;;'O III '0 o U '" c o g .- ~ fU u o .... GI C .- .c u fU :e D.O'" C I. ._ 0 " .5 ~:e >. 0 cuI-- ~> GI .~ 1.= taD t).O .- .- '" V u.. ~ o u({) >c( "-a :s c tn< iij ...' 5: III VI :l Q.l ... c: U ~ :l ~ E Q.l ... .D ... E ._ :l o t; ~ u VI 0 Q.l o ... :l c~ Olll~ "C Q.l 0 Q.l c: c: v; :E 'E o U o.IIllllZ c: Eo...... Dll ...> 'Vi ~ Dll IIl:S~ VlC- III Q./ Q./ 3: :> VI Q./ .&: ... C 0.... Q./ .- Q.l ...V;Dll o Q./ III ... :l VI VI l:T.... Z >-Q./o...... cQ.lc> III >-'_ '0 0 E .- - III o a..&: E ... Q./ ... Q./ ~ o III III .!: III ~ Z E .&: Q./ ...... "C~~> .- :l Dll o 0..- U C Q./ .... 0-'" ,..:eoz III ~.!: ...... .Q~E> III U 0 - Ill'" Q./" III 58.~"C ... >- :l 0 1Il1-_U ('fl ..--v ~ - ~ ~ U_ "'- & ,-r- -?;I 0 - ----.: . -+ V) - /. J1 --1 L l.u 'V w ') '.;1 > 0 \:;- <( :> <t 'C.,) lD ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ 1\ \, . \ \ .\\ \\ >- >-- 2. 2 '>- '>- (. u V\ o ( ~ ~ ~ I' ~ u c: Ll. rl 51 \~ to 0- ~ -L 'Z ~ ~ = ct ) ~ ,< ~ ~ r <0 '/ I-- '- :r ~ if) + o Q) -- c. OL~ jjJtJ) N >- L '.>- 2 '>- L >- '>- >- J J u m J + )"r, j "- ~ '.V V) -0 v :) 0 - ~ cr > l.. ..L r1 :c ~ a: ") -1.0' a .J... >- 0 ~ I 0 -t- tJ - ~ - - CL - - - I 3 T .--! r .:i ~ r^ - ~ () l/) () -0 2- f 0 ,/ ~ 0 rJ ~ t,/) u .> ~ 0 - - --cl W ~ (tl -cl tb ~ cJ:. to> .,) co Lu ~ L~ 0 C E '0 Q) x E Q) ... I,/l '0 '0 C C 11l III ~ Q) 00 11l c( Cl >.: W S L 0 Itl C ~ () '6 L. 0 0 u Vi V V I,/l Q) Q) E L. '0 '0 Itl '0 L. Z c( a. Q) ... S >. >. Q) I,/l ~ ~ o 6 ~ c( ~ Q) '2 V;'~~~~ ~ 2~~ ~ Vi 'c ~ ~ ~ ~ 0. ~ Q)1,/l~E~_v~ O-CClJ UItl O-"'I,/lL.:lO.c e~ 6~1Il~ 0 Q) 1Il.Q"3C5 ~IIUa.1I J:a:::aJ..J1I1I "U'l""c(""" II ">0 ~~Ua.lIl~J:a:::aJ...J> 41 "C o U r- 0 r () lJ) rl iT Ii a. l'f) N r Cl <( T Ql > 0 CO > ~ ~ l.. ~ J: U'l c:) I J "') o CY ~ o - U1 U) -- .,) > J :t: o ...) ~ ..!. cJ J \) cO . .J. ~ iJ Q) c o .c a. (rl) ~-' '" c o .- -1.1 ta u o .... cu c .- .c u ta :E D.o'" C l- ._ 0 " c c .- cu:E > 0 ."",1- .1.1> cutl.l 1..= ta .- .D t).O .- .- '" V '" u.. cu o~ >C "" S c U)C I'tl ,.., ~ ~ ~ ~ c:: c:: v ClI ~ ~ E ClI .. E :e 5 o .. v U v v ~ 0 o "" ~ .:,8 o I'll t '0 ClI 0 ~ c:: c:: lS ~ 'E Q.I'IlI'llZ c:: Eo..... 0000""> 'iij c:: 00 I'll :0 .5 UI c:: = 3 ~ ~ ClI .I:. "" c:: 0"" ~.~ ~ o ClI I'll tii g..~ Z ~ClIO..... I'll ClI.5 > ~i5'E OQ.ClI Ef ClI ... ClI g UI ,_ I'll E.I:. v '0 ... ._ ::I o Q. .... UI ClI t:z ClI..... lij> 00 'v g.!!t ''':; :e 0 I'll III c:: Z vv..-......... '- ..Q~E> >- .J!! ~ B ~.4Jcul1J 00."''0 VI ~ 2. 8 ::r: ClI ... o "" III .... o III III ClI ... '0 '0 I'll '0 l: I'll - ClI E I'll Z 1'"; :, o <V c;: .~ '.) d ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ L ] "2. r-l J. 11\ '10 J ..: I \.. c) ~ o 4- o N m .:i ~ \J.J o <:::C i.: o c E .... o x Q) '" '0 c C1l Q) 00 <l: ( LA E ~ .> - ~ to ~ J .,) o o -5 tj) .:J - .....c) -V ~ > L C} :1 J ..., o Ci tIJ '" .. c: Q) o 0 v t1 '.A:j C ~~ ,,!:! Q) III C V III Q) o C1l :> '- l? c: l? It 8 It V1 It l?l?u >- tl) >- <i: Q) ~ >-00 c ,-tl)V ~ ,~ ~ 3 ~ ~ E 1: ::J::: Q. ": ~o=~~ o~v .I:.CO~o"'..::lO.I:. a.. II c: :::c tl) f1l CJ"::> ~ 1t<l:1t 1t000CO:::i>o a.. co ~ II It It II It :::CO::CD...JSO cu '0 o U Qj .g '0 c: I'll ~ I'll o i.: tV 3 ~ L 0 )~o- ... III V III tl) tl) ~ '0' E '0 .. I'll '0 a.. Z <l: tl) '- 3 o () ci r1, a. N r- r- tJ) v rl') r- CJ :r o CO ~ :t ~ f1l Vi cJ o - Ui lfl J > ~ :t o -> j cJ J Q 0) . ~ ~ u Q) C o .c a.. 3~(P,tj~ Distributed to Board: Agenda Item N\). 9;;. 011/ (s, I) February 24, 1992 COUNTY OFl\LBEMl\RLE ,-.-- .r: :::~L1~ I' rUI ,I,',' !," J t", .i ' /~ " r~r;'!l:, I .._....l V ,--.., \ (.)\J roJ'~) (iF ~;t.~ F)EF:\) 1~30:~S COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA RAY D, PETHTEL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND,23219 Secondary System Addition Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated November 6, addition to the Secondary System of Albemarle County effective February 14, 1992. . 1991, the following is hereby approved, ADDITION LENGTH WINGATE FARM Route 1063 (Hunt Country Lane) - From Route 676 to 0.64 mile Northeast Route 676 0.64 Sincerely, ;eK_a~D.J{). 1!eJ:t;ta t/r Pethtel Commissioner ('{i : /'; /j. ;/)t&!.J'I //,', I i) {It? " I .' J, dJ'I./. ".? /'j i J If / i. :' ..."{...-'lj....... I- i /~! rA,I1 ;1(' 4/, '.... 'j' ,-~.,,,, I... ..... I'" ;{ '/' <. { TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY 1 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE I I RECOMMENDED FY 1992-93 BUDGET OVERVIEW EXPENDITURE IllGHLIGHTS SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) o Totals $89,589,535 for the FY 92-93 budget, an increase of $3.7 million (4.35%) over FY 1991-92 GENERAL GOVERNMENT ADMIN, 3,72 3,Tl 0,05 1.52% 4,21 % JUDICIAL 1.24 1.24 1.38% o Provides a 1.24oAl increase for PUBLIC SAFETY 6,06 6,17 0,11 1.80% 6,89% baseline general government PUBLIC WORKS 1.58 1.53 -{),05 -3,32% 1.71% operations. Does not provide for any HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 3,86 3,<n 0,11 3,01% 4.43% expanded or new programs. PARKS, RECREATION, AND CULTURE 2,44 2,45 0,01 0,50% 2,73% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1.68 1.70 0.02 !ill.!. 1.90% o Provides an increase of $890,300 SUBTOTAL GENERAL GOV'T, 20.58 20,84 0,26 1.24% 23,26% (2.80Al) in local funds to the School Division for a total school budget of SCHOOL OPERATIONS 56,44 58,29 1.85 3,28% 65,07% $58.3 million, This reflects an overall SCHOOL DEBT SERVICE 4.48 5,20 0,72 15,98% 5,80% increase of $1.85 million (3.30Al) over SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SYSTEM 60,92 63.49 2.57 4,22% 70,88% FY 91-92. CAPITAL PROGRAM 1.00 1.00 1.12% o Provides $.72 million for new debt CITY REVENUE SHARING 3,28 3.43 0,15 4,57% 3,83% service on school projects REFUNDS 0,07 0,05 -{),02 -28.57% 0,06% o Provides a 4C1Al average increase in TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET as. as 88,81 2.96 3.45" 99.14" agency funding, UNDESIGNATED FUNDS O,Tl 0,86" o Provides undesignated reserve funds in GRAND TOTAL $lIS.as $89,58 $3,73 4,35 " 100,00" thE! amount of $774,930. REVENUE IllGHLIGHTS ~I SUMMARY OF REVENUES (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) o Provides $41.25 million in property taxes to the FY 92-93 budget, an increase 38,91 41.25 2.34 6,01 " 46,05% of $2.34 million (60Al) over FY 91-92. 17.43 18,36 0.93 5,34% 20,50% $56.34 $59,61 3,TT 5.80" 66.54 " o Provides 66.50Al in local revenues for the FY 92-93 operating budget. STATE REVENUES GENERAL FUND 3,90 3,86 -() ,04 -1.03% 4,31% o Maintains the real estate tax rate at SCHOOL FUND 19.62 20,31 0,69 3,52% 22,67% $.72 cents. TOTAL STATE REVENUES $23,52 $24,17 0.65 2.76" 26.98" o Maintains the personal property tax rate FEDERAL REVENUES at $4.30/$100 of assessed value, GENERAL FUND 0.20 0,17 -{),03 -15,00% 0,19 " SCHOOL FUND 1.58 1.82 0,24 ll12.!. 2,03% o Provides level state revenues for TOTAL FEDERAL REVENUES $1.78 $1.99 0.21 11.10" 2,22" general government. OTHER REVENUE 3,64 3,81 0,17 4,67% 4,25" o Provides a 3.50Al increase in state CARRY OVER BALANCE 0.56 -{),S6 -100,00 " revenues for the school division. GRAND TOTAL $lIS. as $89,58 $3.73 4.35" 100,00" ~ GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY GENERAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRA nON Board of Supervisors 305,288 289,793 284,835 (20.453) .-6.70 % 0.32% County Executive 369,071 381,616 377,821 8,750 2.37% 0.42% Data Processing 788,271 838,106 838,106 49,835 6.32% 0.94% Elections 127,635 133,771 122,546 (5,089) -3.99% 0.14% Finance 1,711,188 1,827,449 1,800,058 88,870 5.19% 2.01 % Legal Services 191,472 194,268 194,268 2,796 1. 46 % 0.22% Personnel 224.336 156.080 156.080 (68.256) - 30.43 % 0.17% TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRA nON 3,717,261 3,821,083 3,773,714 56,453 1.52% 4.21 % JUDICIAL Circuit Court 53,280 54,448 53,448 168 0.32% 0.06%1 Clerk Circuit Court 405,722 398,807 398,807 (6,915) -1.70% 0.45% Commonwealth Attorney 293,619 296,581 284,981 (3,638) -2.94% 0.32%1 General District Court 9,990 9,970 9,970 (20) -0.20% 0.01 % Juvenile Court 36,542 34,392 34,392 (2, I SO) -5.88% 0.04% Magistrate 4,265 3,660 3,660 ( 605) -14.19% 0.00% Sheriff 437.041 590.370 453.246 16.205 3.71 % 0.51 % TOT AL JUDICIAL 1,240,459 1,388,228 1,238,504 (1,955) -0.16% 1.38 % PUBLIC SAFETY Community Attention 50,200 51,205 51,705 1,505 3.00% 0.06% Emergency Medical Communication 240 0 0 (240) -100.00% 0,(>0 % Fire Department - City 537,595 554,260 554,260 16,665 3.10% 0.62% Fire Department - Volunteer 418,364 425,173 425,173 6,809 1. 63 % 0.47% Fire/Rescue Volunteer Coordinator 35,165 47,778 35,747 582 1.66% 0.04% Forest Fire Extinction 13,595 13 ,595 13 ,595 0 0.00% 0.02% Inspections 612,375 674,633 635,214 22,839 3.73% 0.71% Joint Dispatch Center 368,628 425,840 425,840 57,212 15.52% 0.48% Joint Security Complex 107,225 136,601 136,601 29,376 27.40 % 0.15% Juvenile Detention 45,509 65,000 65,000 19,491 42.83 % 0.07% Offender Aid and Restoration 32,140 40,610 34,070 1,930 6.00% 0.04% Offender Aid and Restoration (flow-thru g 102,722 0 0 (102,722) -100.00% 0.00% Police Department 3,592,704 4,281,749 3,639,294 46,590 1.30% 4.06% Rescue Squads 121,385 160,000 132,570 11 , 185 9.21 % 0.15% SPCA 14,341 11,655 11,655 (2,686) -18.73% 0.01 % T.J. Emergency Medical Service 12.035 12.515 12.395 360 2.99% 0.01% TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 6,064,223 6,900,614 6,173,119 108,896 1. 80 % 6.89% 1 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY (Cont.) PUBLIC WORKS Engineering 558,557 648,217 585,986 27,429 4.91 % 0.65% Refuse Disposal 100,000 181,806 102,445 2,445 2.45% 0.11 % Staff Services 913,708 872,919 833,344 (80,364) -8.80% 0.93% CAC3 Grant 8.000 6.000 6.000 (2. (00) -25.00% 0.01 % TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 1,580,265 1,708,942 1,527,775 (52,490) -3.32% 1.71 % HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AIDS Support Group 5 ,000 5,000 5,000 0 na 0.01 % Central V A Child Development Assoc. 7,340 7,700 7,560 220 3.00% 0.01 % Ch'ville/Albemarle Legal Aid 10,405 12,915 10,720 315 3.03% 0.01 % Children and Youth Commission 15,215 16,515 16,515 1,300 na 0.02% District Home 31,200 32,000 32,000 800 2.56% 0.04% Employment Services Program 58,157 60,616 60,616 2,459 4.23% 0.07% Family Services 5,100 5,100 5,100 0 na 0.01 % Energy Assistance 17,505 16,021 16,021 (1,484) -8048% 0.02% Health Department 496,000 510,880 510,880 14,880 3.00% 0.57% Jefferson Area Board for the Aging 89,350 95,400 92,030 2,680 3.00% 0.10% Jefferson Area United Transportation 140,340 176,010 150,775 10,435 7.44% 0.17% Madison House 3,785 3,860 3,900 115 3.04% 0.00% Medicaid/UV A Program 152,806 165,198 165,198 12,392 8.11 % 0.18% Mental Health - Region Ten 197 ,000 201,180 201,180 4,180 2.12% 0.22% Outreach Counseling 21,430 23 ,000 22,075 645 3.01 % 0.02% Sexual Assault Resource Agency 12,500 25 ,000 12,875 375 3.00% 0.01 % Shelter for Help in Emergency 32,135 57, 180 35,930 3,795 11.81% 0.04% Senior Center 0 9,600 0 0 0.00% 0.00% Social Services 2,519,932 2,671,504 2,599,727 79,795 3.17% 2.90% United Way Scholarship Program 40.250 60.710 23.450 (16.800) -41.74% 0.03% TOTAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 3,855,450 4,155,389 3,971,552 116,102 3.01 % 4.43% PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURE Library 1,376,405 1,470,774 1,414,380 37,975 2.76% 1.58 % Literacy Volunteers 9,200 10,857 9,570 370 4.02% 0.01 % Parks & Recreation 867,467 867,426 822,717 (44,750) -5.16% 0.92% Piedmont Council of the Arts 6,200 6,060 6,000 (200) -3.23% 0.01 % Rivanna Park 82,175 102,930 102,930 20,755 25.26% 0.11 % Virginia Discovery Museum 21,200 21 ,000 20,000 (1,200) -5.66% 0.02% Visitors Bureau 75,922 75,278 75,278 (644) -0.85% 0.08% WVPT Public Television Q 5.130 Q Q 0.00% 0.00% TOTAL PARKS,RECREATION/CULTURE 2,438,569 2,559,455 2,450,875 12,306 0.50% 2.74% ~ GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY (Cont.) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Albemarle Housing Improvement 275,430 312,534 284,180 8,750 3.18% 0.32% Bus Service/Route 29N 31,491 29,500 29,500 (1,991) -6.32 % 0.03% Gypsy Moth Program 9,695 17,025 9,700 5 0.05% 0.01% Housing and Redevelopment 154,535 160,773 160,773 6,238 4.04% 0.18% Monticello Community Action Agency 36,085 40,285 37,170 1,085 3.01 % 0.04% Planning 664,515 707,661 671,447 6,932 1.04% 0.75% Soil/W ater Conservation 20,283 34,760 20,779 496 2.45% 0.02% VPI Extension Service 89,636 76,070 74,300 (15,336) -17.11 % 0.08% Watershed Management 41,575 43,418 43, 183 1,608 3.87% 0.05% Zoning 313,542 343,042 319,436 5,894 1.88% 0.36% Thomas Jeff. Planning District Comm. 45.485 47.140 47.140 1.655 3.64% 0.05% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,682,272 1,812,208 1,697,608 15,336 0.91 % 1. 89 % NON-DEPARTMENTAL Debt Service 4,329,518 5,195,385 5,195,385 865,867 20.00% 5.80% Debt Service Reserve 150,000 0 0 (150,000) 0.00% County/City Revenue Sharing 3,277 ,350 3,426,000 3,426,000 148,650 4.54% 3.82% Refunds 67,500 56,000 56,000 (11,500) -17.04% 0.06% Capital Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0.00% 1.12 % Undesignated Reserv,e Fund 774.933 774.933 0.87% TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL 8,824,368 9,677 ,385 10,452,318 1,627,950 18.45% 11.67 % EDUCATION Transfer to School Operations School Fund (other than local) Piedmont Va. Community College TOTAL EDUCATION 31,463,182 24,979,694 6.600 56,449,476 32,353,490 25,938,270 7.310 58,299,070 32,353,490 25,938,270 7.310 58,299,070 890,308 958,576 710 1,849,594 2.83% 3.84% 10.76% 3.28% 36.12 % 28.95% 0.01 % 65.08% BUDGET SCHEDULE March 4, 1992 Budget Distributed to Board of Supervisors March 11, 1992 Public Hearing on Recommended Budget March 16, 18, 23, & 25 Board of Supervisors' Budget Work Sessions April 8, 1992 Public Hearing on Proposed Budget and Tax Levy April 15, 1992 Board of Supervisors' Adoption of Budget " 11 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE & ALBEMARLE COUNTY TO: Albemarle County Board of supervisors RE: Hearing March 11, 1992 on proposed Budget for 1992-93 Before we speak to the proposed budget itself, we would like to commend the staff for preparing a thorough Program Review Report and a reader-friendly budget document. We are pleased to note the emphasis on coordinating or consolidating services and the improvements in the evaluation process which should result in greater accountability. We also want to thank the staff, particularly Roxanne White, for willingly answering questions and providing assistance to interested members of the public. Thank goodness that the revenue picture looks somewhat brighter than it did several months ago: interest rates have fallen more than expected, collections have been better than expected, and increased fees charged for services to developers have brought in additional funds. We hate to think what the picture would have been without these fortunate increases above revenue projections. BUT, this is still a bare bones budget. Across-the-board increases of 2-3% do not cover inflation, much less regain lost ground from the last few years. There are practically no new initiatives: and several worthy requests are unfunded. It is most distressing that the undesignated funds in this budget are only about a third of last year's -- and only 1% of the total. There are so many unmet needs to address with such a limited amount of discretionary money. We would like to suggest several general areas that we think are insufficiently funded in the proposed budget. 1) Good government must be responsible for implementation and enforcement of ordinances. In this budget, there are no funds for an erosion control inspector or for administration of the WRPA (Water Resources protection Area) Ordinance. What good is it to have policies and documents, if there are no funds to implement and enforce them? 2) Good government must be responsible for the safety of its citizens. This budget should include a fire prevention inspector, and sufficient police for our population. It proposes funding 1.14 police per thousand population...57% of the nationally recommended ratio, and 76% of your own target ratio. By either standard, this seems inadequate. 3) Good government provides routine capital replacements for items such as vehicles and computers. For several years Albemarle has . - .~ 2 been deferring many of these purchases. This is penny wise and pound foolish and can't continue indefinitely. 4) Good government provides schools with strong financial support for programs that equip our students to assume their rightful places in the adult world, and salaries that ensure that we retain high quality teachers and staff. This year, even if we are lucky enough to get increased school funding from the state, the School Board deserves your help with the more than $1 million of unfunded items on its priority list. We would like to comment on a few additional items: 1) We believe that the County must provide the $25,000 for the Fiscal Impact Study of Growth. 2) We support the continuation of the curb-side recycling program until the County can do a thorough cost-benefit analysis of all possible recycling options, including service districts. The staff report notes that when newspapers are included in the curbside program, the costs drop from $88/ton to $52/ton, so the County gets more bang for the buck and it brings the county closer to the state's mandate of 25% recycled by 1995. As for funding an Ivy Landfill drop-off facility, we suggest a limited-time, well-marked pilot project, so that factors such as costs, tonnage, and contamination can be evaluated. We further suggest that you ini tiate and fund a pilot recycling project with a franchised hauler in some section of the urban ring, to determine the feasibility of such an effort. 3) We support County funding of AHIP's full-time Emergency Repair position, if funds are not forthcoming from other sources. 4) Funds certainly should be designated for some program to keep teen mothers in school until graduation. We trust that the Children and Youth commission will recommend the most effective use of such funds. 5) Finally it's obvious that the League of Women Voters would not miss the opportunity to express its support for funding the costs of redistricting and new voting machines. In the coming weeks we will be observing budget work sessions and following your deliberations. We wish there were more undesignated funds. We know it's unrealistic this year to ask for a tax increase, although looking at all the unfunded needs, we might be tempted to do so. We trust that the input from this public hearing and from presentations during the work sessions will help you to make your tough decisions. DATE /?ltUd/ I / f/7' 2-- AGENDA ITEM NO. ~/ t73# /S-~ AGENDA ITEM NAME ~ r / /~ DEFERRED UNTIL ~ ~ ~~ f" Form.3 7/25/86 DATE 3-/,,2-;72- AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ /~(;1 f( /~ '7 AGENDA ITEM NAME ~//hJ.M/ ~cd ~/ DEFERRED UNTIL ~~ /~y~ Form. 3 7/25/86 I DEFERRED UNTIL 3~//-j?.)--- jP.?, /.::3t7':fL/~Y ~7~~~ r<</ /~Y.J- DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. AGENDA ITEM NAME Form. 3 7/25/86 DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. AGENDA ITEM NAME DEFERRED UNTIL Form.3 7/25/86 ~!/;r~ Distributed to Board: 2, ~, 7.2 Agenda Item No. _ 9 ;< . 0'7 ~Y.IS 3 --" COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of County Executive 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5841 AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Date: March 11, 1992 Aaenda Item #: ?d. t?3tfJ7":/03 Title: Movinq of CSX Transportation, Inc. Aqency Office to Richmond, virqinia Issue: On March 4, 1992, the Board of Supervisors requested additional information regarding the county's notification that csx railroad intended to move its agency office to Richmond. Backqround: According to Mr. William E. Elmore, Director, Division of Railroad Regulation, in Richmond, this agency move will affect 2-3 employees who are currently working in Charlottesville by transferring them to Richmond. This agency office is involved with scheduling cars for freight service and coordination with the users of railroad freight. Most of this business is currently conducted by phone and the move to Richmond will provide an "800" number for statewide users. This move is a result of centralization of railroad operations and should not affect rail service in any way to the Charlottesville- Albemarle area. Recommendation: For the Board's information. Staff ContactCs): Messrs. Tucker and Huff. jdbm 92.032 csx TRANSPORTATION CSX RAIL TRANSPORT Law Department Distr]but~d to Board' 7" ' .' ) '-(.,.((-~-,[51,. t'l.,genda Iti~nl No '.7), (^..L.( '( (,' '7) l --..i. ~" -...' /' V - .. ~ ~ , t. ...0 , ,.n_,.., .'._~ ,," i' ~\ r.~ ~~J1 , ) ("..' ~. ;( \" ,.' :. '._ .:~, : ,i" i..... .. L .- February 13, 1992 ;~'D' ,'~~~t~~~~~~6 JaCkSO~i1~L 32202 " ') (~P~' ~59-3100 Writer's direct t9lep~one line: .' \" 1 . ( ."...-( 1 !. ,~ :.. .....,. '.-.,} , 1<.,;;:"-"'\ '--~ . . 35.9,:'\'"1'?)5,Q-. (~i ~>1\) f" C,,'';'.' ,S~,.-~, "~\, I"\~":~ !....,.-::.:.. '; r . i,l>-'''''' .. It , ii \\ r \.\ t~f~~~~~.-,~ RE: Application of CSX Transportation, Inc. for authority to move its agency at Charlottesville, virginia, and the stations Under its Jurisdiction to the Richmond, Virginia Transportation Service Center TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: By Order of the State Corporation commission, Commonwealth of virginia, I do this day hereby serve a copy of the Order Requiring Notice of Application in the captioned matter on the following: .' VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED Honorable David P. Bowerman County Administrator Albemarle County 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Honorable Charles W. Curry Chairman, Board of supervisors Albemarle County Route 2, Box 78B Mt. Solon, VA 22843 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL Mr. Nick Collins President Transit Mixed Concrete P. O. Box 1421 Staunton, VA 24401 Mr. Charles A. powell, Jr. Senior vice President-Sales Luck Stone Corporation P. o. Box 29682 Richmond, VA 23229 Honorable Patrick J. Coffield County Executive Augusta county P. O. Box 590 Verona, VA 24482 Honorable Robert W. Tucker, Jr. Chairman, Board of supervisors Augusta County P. O. Box 590 Verona, VA 24482 Mr. John L. Wellison Director of Marketing Lee Tennis Products 999 Grove street Charlottesville, VA 22903 Mr. H. H. Hanger Manager Special Operations Commonwealth Propane, Inc. P. O. Box 257 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Mr. Ron Martin Store Manager Lowe's Contractor Sales Yard Route 250 E P. O. Box 1583 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Mr. victor Pas President Valley Timber Sales P. O. Box 969 Troy, VA 22974 Mr. Charles E. Haney Vice President Better Living, Inc. P. O. Box 7627 Charlottesville, VA 22901 Mr. L. A. Randall Manager Distribution ConAgra Frozen Foods P. O. Box 97 Crozet, VA 22932 Mr. W. B. Roberson Materials Control Manager DuPont Company DuPont Blvd. Waynesboro, VA 22980 Mr. Bruce Fitzgerald Manager Agmark Intermodal Systems, Inc. P. o. Box 173 Fishersville, VA 22939 Shoffner Industry, Inc. P. O. Box 297 Fishersville, VA 22939 - 2 - - 3 - Mr. Dale C. smith General Manager & Treasurer Augusta Cooperative Farm Bureau, Inc. 1205 B Richmond Road Staunton, VA 24401 Mr. Donald E. Hoover Maintenance Supervisor Augusta Hosptial Corp. 1410 North Augusta street Staunton, VA 24401 Ms. Rebecca S. Coyner Receiving Secretary Lowes #14 795 Statler Blvd. Staunton, VA 24401 Mr. Roy Bartley Warehouse Manager Staunton Building Supply 867 Middlebrook Avenue Staunton, VA 24401 Mr. William F. Law powerPlant Supervisor B Staunton Correctional Center P. O. Box 3500 Staunton, VA 24401 Mr. Jan H. Crawford Vice President Staunton Metal Recyclers 511 Bridge Street Staunton, VA 24401 University of Virginia 575 Alderman Road Physics Plant Charlottesville, VA 22903 sicalco, Limited 5240 West 123rd Place Alsip, IL 60656 ~,~ Charles M. Rosenberger Attorney for Applicant CSX Transportation, Inc. 500 Water Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Telephone: (904) 359-1250 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 9 2 0 1 3 0 ~(~'j:~",T f,G~J: ;'-,,,~~,S9RPORATION COMMISSION 2 7 4 f I:C" J!\l -;- IOI~! ",J'.43 ..;..;1. :.,: '- f ..; APPLICATION OF AT RICHMOND, JANU.z.RY 27, 1992 CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. CASE NO. RRR920001 ~~r C~~;~~~~~;V~~l:~v~i~~~n~~~n~~d ,,;<:-~,~T:--!~'- the non-agency stations under its ( ~, jurisdiction, to Richmond, Virginia. ORDER REOUIRING NOTICE OF APPLICATION \ '~t.~' 2' 9 IF: In an application filed with the State corporatl~~ \. .~'- Commission on January 13, 1992 I CSX Transportation, Inc,., " (WCSXTW), requests authority to move its agency a~ Charlottesville, and the non-agency stations under its jurisdiction, namely, Afton, Crozet, Farmington, Fishersville, . Ivy, Keswick, Mechum's River, Peyton, Shadwell, Staunton and Waynesboro, Virginia, to CSXT's Richmond, virgini~Transportation Service Center. IT APPEARING to the Commission that CSXT should be directed to notify the public of its application; and IT FURTHER APPEARING that the public should be afforded the opportunity to file written comments concerning the application and to request a formal hearing before the Commission on any substantive objection which cannot be presented effectively in writing; accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: (1) That the Commission's Division of Railroad Regulation investigate this application and file, on or before May 22, 1992, an original and five (5) copies of any comments or recommendations it has to offer concerning this application and simultaneously send a copy thereof to CSXT; .1' (2) That, on or before February 21, 1992, CSXT file with the Commission an original and ten (10) copies of any additional testimony and exhibits of any witnesses it proposes to offer in support of its application; (3) That any person who desires to file written comments concerning the application or request a formal hearing on a substantive objection which cannot be effectively presented in writing shall file, on or before March 20, 1992, an original and five (5) copies of such comments or request for hearing with the Clerk, state Corporation Commission, c/o Document.Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216 and simultaneously send a copy thereof to ct~rles M. Rosenberger, Senior. Counsel, CSX Transportation, Inc., 500 Water street, Jacksonville, Florida 32202; (4) That CSXT shall forthwith post a true copy of this order in a conspicuous place in its station building at Charlottesville, Virginia; (5) That CSXT, on or before February 21, 1992, shall cause. to be served a true copy of this order on the Chairman, Board of Supervisors and County Administrator for Albemarle and Augusta Counties, and the mayors of the cities of Charlottesville, Staunton and Waynesboro, Virginia, service to be made by personal delivery, or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the customary place of business or the residence of the person served; (6) That, on or before February 21, 1992, CSXT shall provide a true copy of this order to all shippers or receivers 2 . r who have obtained service within the past two years through the Charlottesville agency by personal delivery or by first-class mail to the last known business address of such shipper or receiver, and that CSX shall furnish to the Division of Railroad Regulation a list of all such shippers and receivers on or before March 20, 1992; (7) That CSXT, on or before February 21, 1992, shall cause the following notice to be published in a newspaper or newspapers having general circulation in the affected area: PUBLIC NOTICE ~ Public notice is hereby given of an application filed with the state Corporation Commission by CSX Transportation, Inc. ("Applicant"). Applicant requests authority to move its agency at Charlottesville, Virginia, along with the non-agency stations under its jurisdiction, namely, Afton, Crozet, Farmington, Fishersville, Ivy, Keswick, Mechum's River, Peyton, Shadwell, Staunton and Waynesboro, Virginia, to Applicant's Richmond, Virginia Transportation Service Center. Any person desiring to file written comments concerning the application or a request for a formal hearing on an objection which cannot be effectively presented in writing shall, on or before March 20, 1992, send an original and five (5) copies of such COID~ents or request for hearing to the Clerk, state Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216. Copies of such comments or request for hearing must also be sent simultaneously to Charles M. Rosenberger, Senior Counsel, CSX Transportation, Inc., 500 Water Street, Jacksonville, Florida 32202. A request for hearing must state a substantive objection to the application and the reasons it cannot be effectively presented in writing. If the Commission does not receive any proper request for hearing, it may rule on the application without a hearing. 3 Further information concerning the application may be obtained from William E. Elmore, Director, Division of Railroad Regulation, P.o. Box 1197, Richmond, Virginia 23209, or by telephoning (804) 786-3682. (8) That proof of the foregoing publication shall be furnished to the Commission by CSXT on or before March 20, 1992. AN ATTESTED COPY of this order shall be mailed by the Clerk of the Commission, CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, to Charles M. Rosenberger, Senior Counsel, CSX Transportation, Inc., 500 Water Street, Jacksonville, Florida 32202. . Ar~~OpyW~,. ti' . ~ ;Ft t'~~~. , . -..... ' . . '" State ~Ierk of the '.' . - - , CorporatIon Commi' ".::r..~ sS/on ~". 4 "-.~""~' , '" ') -. ''''\ ~' Edward H. Bain, Jr. Samuel Miller COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 March 12, 1992 Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville David P. Bowerman Charlottesville Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Delegate Mitchell Van Yahres 408 Altamont Circle Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 RE: Primary Road Hearing in Culpeper - March 31, 1992 Dear Mitch: Thank you for your offer to accompany County representatives to Culpeper and support discussion of the various primary road needs in our community. You obviously could be most beneficial to us if you would be willing to speak to the efforts that City, County and University representatives have made in agreeing on a sequencing plan for improvements to the Route 29 North Corridor. I think just simply focusing on that item and how the three entities have worked together with the state in pursuing a reasonable solution to the improvement needs of that corridor would be most helpful. Secondly, I think if you also encourage the need to pursue vigorously the preliminary design of the grade separated interchanges along 29 North at Hydraulic Road, Greenbrier Drive, and Rio Road, as well as ultimate right-of-way acquisition would be very productive. Again, thank you for your willingness to do this. I have attached a copy of my proposed statement and the report that will be left with VDoT which touches on those items I have mentioned above but I will certainly give you the opportunity if you so choose to comment on those items with the Commonwealth Transportation Board. Sincerely, c2J~ David P. Bowerman, Chairman DPB/dbm 92.013 STATEMENT OF DAVID P. BOWERMAN, CHAIRMAN ALBEMARLE COUNTRY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD PRE-ALLOCATION HEARING ON INTERSTATE AND PRIMARY SYSTEMS CULPEPER DISTRICT MARCH 31, 1992 GOOD MORNING. I'M DAVID BOWERMAN, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY. WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A FEW BRIEF COMMENTS ABOUT OUR PRIMARY ROAD NEEDS. TO BEGIN WITH, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTINUES TO PLACE ITS HIGHEST PRIORITY ON UNDERTAKING THOSE CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (CATS) PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR THE PRIMARY PROGRAM. WE WOULD EXPECT THESE PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN IN SEQUENCE AS CALLED FOR IN THE FEBRUARY 2, 1992 JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITY, COUNTY AND UNIVERSITY AND AGREED TO BY VDOT. WITH THE COMPLETION OF THE ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, WE ARE VERY ANXIOUS TO SEE THE WIDENING OF ROUTE 29 NORTH FROM THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE TO THE SOUTH FORK RIVANNA RIVER TAKE PLACE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THIS PROJECT SHOULD INCLUDE INTERCHANGE ACQUISITION AT HYDRAULIC, GREENBRIER AND RIO ROADS AS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN THE ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR STUDY. WE CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MEADOWCREEK PARKWAY FROM THE ROUTE 250 BY-PASS TO ROUTE 29 NORTH IS OF CRITICAL IMPORTANCE. AS THE ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR STUDY INDICATES, THIS ROAD IS ESSENTIAL TO REDUCING TRAFFIC ON ROUTE 29 NORTH. THE FIRST PHASE -1- OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE FUNDED IN THE COUNTY'S SECONDARY PROGRAM. ULTIMATELY, WE BELIEVE THE PARKWAY WILL MEET THE CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION IN THE PRIMARY SYSTEM AND WANT TO WORK WITH VDOT STAFF TO EVALUATE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSEQUENT PHASES AS A PRIMARY ROAD, IF THIS WILL ACCELERATE THE PARKWAY'S COMPLETION. THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE OFFER FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. THESE ARE DEFINITELY ADDRESSED IN A REPORT WE WILL LEAVE WITH YOUR STAFF AND INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: o WIDENING OF U.S. ROUTE 250 WEST FROM EMMET STREET TO ROl~E 637 IN IVY. o CONDUCTING A ROADWAY ANALYSIS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO U. S. 250 EAST FROM ITS INTERCHANGE AT INTERSTATE 64 EASTWARD TO THE FLUVANNA COUNTY LINE. PARTICULAR ATTENTION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THAT SEGMENT FROM THE INTERSTATE TO THE RIVANNA VILLAGE. o CONTINUING THE PROCESS OF CLOSING CROSSOVERS ALONG U.S. 29 NORTH AS RECOMMENDED IN A VDOT STUDY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON MAY 10, 1979, AND REAFFIRMED BY THE BOARD ON NOVEMBER 8, 1989. o FINALIZING THE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR ROUTE 20 SOUTH IN ORDER TO PROVIDE GENERAL ALIGNMENT -2- IMPROVEMENTS TO THIS ROADWAY. o IMPROVING THE NORTH/SOUTH CONNECTION BETWEEN ROUTE 250 AND ROUTE 240, EITHER THROUGH AN IMPROVED ALIGNMENT OF ROUTE 240 FROM ROUTE 250 NORTHWARD TO ROUTE 810, INCLUDING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CSX RAILROAD UNDERPASS, OR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROUTE 240-ROUTE 250 CONNECTOR ROAD RECOMMENDED IN THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. o DEVELOPING FUNCTIONAL PLANS FOR ROUTE 20 NORTH WHICH SHOULD IDENTIFY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS THAT ADDRESS SIGHT DISTANCE AND CURVATURE DEFICIENCIES. o DEVELOPING DESIGN PLANS FOR THE WIDENING OF FONTAINE AVENUE FROM JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE TO THE ROUTE 29 BY-PASS INTERCHANGE. o CONSTRUCTING AN INTERCHANGE ON INTERSTATE 64 AT AVON STREET (ROUTE 742). WE KNOW OUR LIST OF PROJECTS WILL TAKE MANY YEARS TO COMPLETE WITH AVAILABLE FUNDING. BUT, WE ARE CONCERNED BECAUSE COMPARING THE FIVE-YEAR OVERLAP OF THE FY 90-91 FINAL ALLOCATION TO THE FY 91-92 FINAL PROJECTED ALLOCATION SHOWS THAT THE COUNTY LOST MORE FUNDING FOR ITS PRIMARY ROAD PROJECTS THAN THE CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT DID AS A WHOLE. WE URGE YOU TO RETAIN A FAIR SHARE OF -3- DISTRICT FUNDS FOR COUNTY PROJECTS IN FUTURE FUNDING SO THE PROJECTS ON OUR LIST CAN BE REALIZED. WE AGAIN THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY AND IF QUESTIONS ARISE, OF IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED REGARDING OUR RECOMMENDATIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT ME OR A MEMBER OF OUR COUNTY STAFF. DPB/dbm 92.014 -4- ) / 4. ALBEMARLE COUNTY SIX YEAR PRIMARY ROAD PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION The County Board of Supervisors submits the following comments and recommendations for projects to be considered by VDOT in its Six Year Primary Allocation Plan: 1. Place the highest priority on undertaking Charlottesville Area Transportation Study (CATS) projects which are eligible for the Primary Program. These projects include: (a) widening of Route 29 North, (b) widening of Route 250 West; and, (c) widening of Route 29 Business (Fontaine Avenue) . 2. Undertake these projects in sequence as called for in the joint resolution between the City, County, and University dated February 2, 1992 and agreed to by VDOT. Widen Route 29 North from the northern corporate limits of Charlottesville to the South Fork Rivanna River. This project should include interchanges at Hydraulic, Greenbrier and Rio Roads as considered necessary in the Route 29 North Corridor D.E.I.S. At a minimum, the necessary right-of-way for the interchanges should be acquired with the initial widening project. This project is considered the highest priority. In relation to Route 29 North improvements and as considered necessary in the D.E.I.S., the County recommends the construction of the Meadow Creek Parkway. Request that the Virginia Department of Transportation evaluate development of the Meadow Creek Parkway as a primary road if this will provide the most immediate funding opportunity. Construct Meadow Creek in accordance with the recommendations of the County's Comprehensive Plan. This is considered a high priority. 3 . Close Route 29 crossovers consistent with the previously endorsed priorities (Attachment 1). This priority list of closings is based on the "Route 29 North Corridor Study", adopted by the Board on May 10, 1979 and reaffirmed by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on November 8, 1989. To date six of the total 13 recommended for closure have been closed. Of the remaining seven, three will be closed as part of the Route 29 widening project. Funds should be provided to close the remaining four crossovers. Continue functional planning work on Route 20 South. Initial functional plans are under a second review by VDOT staff. Particular emphasis should be placed on the impact of improvements to the Route 20 South corridor as it is designated a State Scenic Byway and County Scenic Highway. 5. Improve the alignment of Route 240 from Route 250 northward to Route 810 in Crozet including improvements to the CSX railroad underpass. In response to previous requests by the County, functional plans have been developed for Route 240 from Route 250 north to Crozet and east to Route 250. The plans call for improving the horizontal and vertical alignment of the road for both north-south and east-west segments. Both segments would be 24 feet wide with two lane roads. A proposed Route 240-Route 250 connector road recommended in the County's Comprehensive Plan should be considered as an alternative to upgrading the existing alignment of Route 240. 6. Widen Route 250 West from Emmett street to Route 637 in Ivy. The Charlottesville Area Transportation study (CATS) recommends that Route 250 Business (Ivy Road) be widened to four lanes with a flush median (center turn lane) between the Bypass and Emmett Street. The Plan also calls for Route 250 to be widened to a four lane divided road from the Route 29/250 Bypass to Route 677, and four lane undivided from Route 677 to Route 637. The final design for these improvements are important because Route 250 is designated as an entrance corridor route and is considered. a gateway to the County, City, and University and should reflect the design priorities as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and the Lewis Mountain Neighborhood Study. ) These improvements are recommended as Phase II improvements in CATS. Strong consideration should be given for the inclusion of these projects in the Six Year Primary Plan for ultimate funding and construction. All projects in the County recommended as Phase I improvements in CATS are already programmed for development in either the six Year Primary or Secondary Road Plan. The County recommends development of this project in three phases. These are listed in priority order below: 1. Emmett Street to Route 29/250 Bypass 2. Bypass to Route 677 3. Route 677 to Route 637 (in Ivy). 7. Widen Route 29 Business (Fontaine Avenue) from the Route 29 Bypass to Jefferson Park Avenue. This would include a segment in the City from Jefferson Park / Avenue to the corporate limits. Design plans should be developed in coordination with the City, County, and University from the Route 29 interchange to Jefferson Park Avenue (JPA). This improvement is recommended as a Phase IV project in CATS. CATS recommends widening the road to four lanes. Currently, Fontaine Avenue carries 12,980 vehicle trips per day. Development of the University Real Estate Foundation property for office and service related uses is anticipated to generate over 5,700 additional vehicle trips. With the development of the UREF office park development, the coordination of improvements along Fontaine from I-64 to Jefferson Park Avenue in the primary and urban system are essential. 8. Conduct a systematic study of Route 250 East from the Interstate Route 64 interchange to the Fluvanna County line, with particular attention given to the segment from the interchange to the Rivanna Village. Due to the potential for increased growth in this area and the designation of the Rivanna Village that would be served by this road, there will be increasing traffic demands on Route 250. This study should provide recommendations for road improvements that will be needed to maintain an adequate level of service. 'j / 9. Conduct a systematic study of Route 20 North from Route 250 East to the Orange County line. Current traffic counts indicated that there are 3,100 vehicle trips per day on this road. There are numerous locations with substandard design, including intersections with insufficient site distance and existing alignments not meeting vertical and/or horizontal curvature standards. 10. Develop a priority list of spot safety improvements for primary routes. This list would be developed by County staff and the VDOT resident engineer and would be used to request improvements in future six Year Primary Road Plans. 11. The County continues to recommend the construction of an interchange on Interstate Route 64 at Avon Street. ATTACHMENT 1 Recommended priority for crossover closings: 1. * 2. * 3. * 4. 5. * 6. * 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Dominion Drive, #9 Better Living Furniture, #16 Kegler's, #15 South of Rivanna Industrial Park, #33 (closed) South of Holly Memorial Garden, #26 (closed) North of Route 643 crossover, #21 (closed) Fabrics Unlimited, #35 Near County Line, #45 North of Route 763 Crossover, #41 (closed) North of Route 763 Crossover, #42 (closed) North of Route 763 Crossover, #43 North of Route 643 Crossover, #20 Crossover at Maupin's Store, #27 (closed) Notes: * Along section of Route 29 North to be reconstructed. / , COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE "'-1 r;;) r;:J nn r" -J I'nl 1". .",."c,___W.t : Ilil I '. 6 1'191 i WI I ..... 'I STATEMENT OF II DAVID BOWERMAN, CHAIRMAN . ; L0rr;U1T Ld ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 8Url.t-.:O OF SUPERVISO~S :4~~~d ~;~ ~ /'~ COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD PRE-ALLOCATION HEARING ON INTERSTATE AND PRIMARY SYSTEMS CULPEPER DISTRICT MARCH 31, 1992 GOOD MORNING, I'M DAVID BOWERMAN, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY. WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A FEW BRIEF COMMENTS ABOUT OUR PRIMARY ROAD NEEDS. TO BEGIN WITH, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTINUES TO PLACE ITS HIGHEST PRIORITY ON UNDERTAKING THOSE CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (CATS) PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR THE PRIMARY PROGRAM. WE WOULD EXPECT THESE PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN IN SEQUENCE AS CALLED FOR IN THE FEBRUARY 2, 1992 JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITY, COUNTY AND UNIVERSITY AND AGREED TO BY VDOT. WITH THE COMPLETION OF THE ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, WE ARE VERY ANXIOUS TO SEE THE WIDENING OF ROUTE 29 NORTH FROM THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE TO THE SOUTH FORK RIVANNA RIVER TAKE PLACE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THIS PROJECT SHOULD INCLUDE INTERCHANGE ACQUISITION AT HYDRAULIC, GREENBRIER AND RIO ROADS AS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN THE ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR STUDY. WE CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MEA~EEK PARKWAY FROM THE ROUTE 250 BYPASS TO ROUTE 29 NORTH IS OF CRITICAL IMPORTANCE. AS THE ; ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR STUDY INDICATES, THIS ROAD IS ESSENTIAL TO REDUCING TRAFFIC ON ROUTE 29 NORTH. THE FIRST PHASE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE FUNDED IN THE COUNTY'S SECONDARY PROGRAM. ULTIMATELY, WE BELIEVE THE PARKWAY WILL MEET THE CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION IN THE PRIMARY SYSTEM AND WANT TO WORK WITH VDOT STAFF TO EVALUATE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSEQUENT PHASES AS A PRIMARY ROAD, IF THIS WILL ACCELERATE THE PARKWAY'S COMPLETION. THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE OFFER FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. THESE ARE DEFINITIVELY ADDRESSED IN A REPORT WE WILL LEAVE WITH YOUR STAFF AND INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: THE WIDENING OF U.S. ROUTE 250 WEST FROM EMME~EET o TO ROUTE 637 IN IVY. o A ROADWAY ANALYSIS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO U.S. 250 EAST FROM ITS INTERCHANGE AT INTERSTATE 64 EASTWARD TO THE FLUVANNA COUNTY LINE. PARTICULAR ATTENTION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THAT SEGMENT FROM THE INTERSTATE TO THE RIVANNA VILLAGE. -~ CONTINUt~THE PROCESS OF CLOSING CROSSOVERS ALONG U.S. o 29 NORTH AS RECOMMENDED IN A VDOT STUDY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON l1AY 10, 197~AND REAFFIRMED BY THE BOARD ON NOVEMBER 8, 1989. .~ FINALIZ~ THE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR ROUTE o 20 SOUTH IN ORDER TO PROVIDE GENERAL ALIGNMENT IMPROVEMENTS TO THIS ROADWAY. o THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE NORTH/SOUTH CONNECTION BETWEEN ROUTE 250 AND ROUTE 240, EITHER THROUGH AN IMPROVED ALIGNMENT OF ROUTE 240 FROM ROUTE 250 NORTHWARD TO ROUTE 810, INCLUDING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CSX RAILROAD UNDERPASS, OR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROUTE 240-ROUTE 250 CONNECTOR ROAD RECOMMENDED IN THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. o DEVELOPMENT OF FUNCTIONAL PLANS FOR ROUTE 20 NORTH WHICH SHOULD IDENTIFY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS THAT ADDRESS SIGHT DISTANCE AND CURVATURE DEFICIENCIES. o DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN PLANS FOR THE WIDENING OF FONTAINE AVENUE FROM JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE TO THE ROUTE ~-= 29 BYPASS INTERCHANGE. o THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN INTERCHANGE ON INTERSTATE 64 AT AVON STREET (ROUTE 742). WE KNOW OUR LIST OF PROJECTS WILL TAKE MANY YEARS TO FUNDING. BUT, WE ARE CONCERNED THAT FY90-91 AND FY91-92 FINAL ALLOCAT~ERIo~s_Lr~_H~____~ MORE FUNDING FOR ITS PRIMARY ROAD PROJECTS THAN THE CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT DID AS A WHOLE. WE URGE YOU TO RETAIN A FAIR SHARE OF DISTRICT FUNDS FOR COUNTY PROJECTS IN FUTURE FUNDING SO THE PROJECTS ON OUR LIST CAN BE REALIZED. WE AGAIN THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY AND IF QUESTIONS ARISE, OR IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED REGARDING OUR RECOMMENDATIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO ,'>.. CONTACT ME OR/MEMBER OF ~UR COUNTY STAFF. ALBEMARLE COUNTY SIX YEAR PRIMARY ROAD PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION The County Board of Supervisors submits the following comments and recommendations for projects to be considered by VDOT in its six Year Primary Allocation Plan: 1. Place the highest priority on undertaking Charlottesville Area Transportation Study (CATS) projects which are eligible for the Primary Program. These projects include: (a) widening of Route 29 North, (b) widening of Route 250 West; and, (c) widening of Route 29 Business (Fontaine Avenue) . 2. Undertake these projects in sequence as called for in the joint resolution between the City, County, and University dated February 2, 1992 and agreed to by VDOT. Widen Route 29 North from the northern corporate limits of Charlottesville to the South Fork Rivanna River. This project should include interchanges at Hydraulic, Greenbrier and Rio Roads as considered necessary in the Route 29 North Corridor D.E.I.S. At a minimum, the necessary right-of-way for the interchanges should be acquired with the initial widening project. This project is considered the highest priority. In relation to Route 29 North improvements and as considered necessary in the D.E.I.S., the County recommends the construction of the Meadow Creek Parkway. Request that the Virginia Department of Transportation evaluate development of the Meadow Creek Parkway as a primary road if this will provide the most immediate funding opportunity. Construct Meadow Creek in accordance with the recommendations of the County's Comprehensive Plan. This is considered a high priority. 3. Close Route 29 crossovers consistent with the previously endorsed priorities (Attachment 1). This priority list of closings is based on the "Route 29 North Corridor Study", adopted by the Board on May 10, 1979 and reaffirmed by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on November 8, 1989. To date six of the total 13 recommended for closure have been closed. Of the remaining seven, three will be closed as part of the Route 29 widening project. Funds should be provided to close the remaining four crossovers. 4. Continue functional planning work on Route 20 South. Initial functional plans are under a second review by VDOT staff. Particular emphasis should be placed on the impact of improvements to the Route 20 South corridor as it is'designated a State Scenic Byway and County Scenic Highway. 5. Improve the alignment of Route 240 from Route 250 northward to Route 810 in Crozet including improvements to the CSX railroad underpass. In response to previous requests by the County, functional plans have been developed for Route 240 from Route 250 north to Crozet and east to Route 250. The plans call for improving the horizontal and vertical alignment of the road for both north-south and east-west segments. Both segments would be 24 feet wide with two lane roads. A proposed Route 240-Route 250 connector road recommended in the County's Comprehensive Plan should be considered as an alternative to upgrading the existing alignment of Route 240. 6. Widen Route 250 West from Emmett street to Route 637 in Ivy. The Charlottesville Area Transportation study (CATS) recommends that Route 250 Business (Ivy Road) be widened to four lanes with a flush median (center turn lane) between the Bypass and Emmett Street. The Plan also calls for Route 250 to be widened to a four lane divided road from the Route 29/250 Bypass to Route 677, and four lane undivided from Route 677 to Route 637. The final design for these improvements are important because Route 250 is designated as an entrance corridor route and is considered a gateway to the County, City, and University and should reflect the design priorities as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and the Lewis Mountain Neighborhood Study. These improvements are recommended as Phase II improvements in CATS. Strong consideration should be given for the inclusion of these projects in the six Year Primary Plan for ultimate funding and construction. All projects in the County recommended as Phase I improvements in CATS are already programmed for development in either the six Year Primary or Secondary Road Plan. The County recommends development of this project in three phases. These are listed in priority order below: 1. Emmett Street to Route 29/250 Bypass 2. Bypass to Route 677 3. Route 677 to Route 637 (in Ivy). 7. Widen Route 29 Business (Fontaine Avenue) from the Route 29 Bypass to Jefferson Park Avenue. This would include a segment in the City from Jefferson Park Avenue to the corporate limits. Design plans should be developed in coordination with the city, County, and University from the Route 29 interchange to Jefferson Park Avenue (JPA). This improvement is recommended as a Phase IV project in CATS. CATS recommends widening the road to four lanes. Currently, Fontaine Avenue carries 12,980 vehicle trips per day. Development of the University Real Estate Foundation property for office and service related uses is anticipated to generate over 5,700 additional vehicle trips. with the development of the UREF office park development, the coordination of improvements along Fontaine from I-64 to Jefferson Park Avenue in the primary and urban system are essential. 8. Conduct a systematic study of Route 250 East from the Interstate Route 64 interchange to the Fluvanna County line, with particular attention given to the segment from the interchange to the Rivanna Village. Due to the potential for increased growth in this area and the designation of the Rivanna Village that would be served by this road, there will be increasing traffic demands on Route 250. This study should provide recommendations for road improvements that will be needed to maintain an adequate level of service. 9. Conduct a systematic study of Route 20 North from Route 250 East to the Orange County line. Current traffic counts indicated that there are 3,100 vehicle trips per day on this road. There are numerous locations with substandard design, including intersections with insufficient site distanc~ and existing alignments not meeting vertical and/or horizontal curvature standards. 10. Develop a priority list of spot safety improvements for primary routes. This list would be developed by County staff and the VDOT resident engineer and would be used to request improvements in future Six Year Primary Road Plans. 11. The County continues to recommend the construction of an interchange on Interstate Route 64 at Avon Street. . J. ATTACHMENT 1 Recommended priority for crossover closings: 1. * 2. * 3. * 4. 5. * 6. * 7 . 8. 9 . 10. 11. 12. 13. Dominion Drive, #9 Better Living Furniture, #16 Kegler's, #15 South of Rivanna Industrial Park, #33 (closed) South of Holly Memorial Garden, #26 (closed) North of Route 643 crossover, #21 (closed) Fabrics Unlimited, #35 Near County Line, #45 North of Route 763 Crossover, #41 (closed) North of Route 763 Crossover, #42 (closed) North of Route 763 Crossover, #43 North of Route 643 Crossover, #20 Crossover at Maupin's Store, #27 (closed) Notes: * Along section of Route 29 North to be reconstructed. l)istributed to Boud: . '~. (p ,tjJ...., Agenda It~m No. '1 A, 010 ,;, I r..-o , STATEMENT OF DAVID BOWERMAN, CHAIRMAN ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD PRE-ALLOCATION HEARING ON INTERSTATE AND PRIMARY SYSTEMS CULPEPER DISTRICT MARCH 31, 1992 GOOD MORNING, I'M DAVID BOWERMAN, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY. WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A FEW BRIEF COMMENTS ABOUT OUR PRIMARY ROAD NEEDS. TO BEGIN WITH, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTINUES TO PLACE ITS HIGHEST PRIORITY ON UNDERTAKING THOSE CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (CATS) PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR THE PRIMARY PROGRAM. WE WOULD EXPECT THESE PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN IN SEQUENCE AS CALLED FOR IN THE FEBRUARY 2, 1992 JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITY, COUNTY AND UNIVERSITY AND AGREED TO BY VDOT. WITH THE COMPLETION OF THE ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, WE ARE VERY ANXIOUS TO SEE THE WIDENING OF ROUTE 29 NORTH FROM THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE TO THE SOUTH FORK RIVANNA RIVER TAKE PLACE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THIS PROJECT SHOULD INCLUDE INTERCHANGE ACQUISITION AT HYDRAULIC, GREENBRIER AND RIO ROADS AS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN THE ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR STUDY. WE CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THE (l CONSTRUCTION OF THE MEADOW CREEK PARKWAY FROM THE ROUTE 250 <--/ BYPASS TO ROUTE 29 NORTH IS OF CRITICAL IMPORTANCE. AS THE ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR STUDY INDICATES, THIS ROAD IS ESSENTIAL TO REDUCING TRAFFIC ON ROUTE 29 NORTH. THE FIRST PHASE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE FUNDED IN THE COUNTY'S SECONDARY PROGRAM. ULTIMATELY, WE BELIEVE THE PARKWAY WILL MEET THE CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION IN THE PRIMARY SYSTEM AND WANT TO WORK WITH VDOT STAFF TO EVALUATE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSEQUENT PHASES AS A PRIMARY ROAD, IF THIS WILL ACCELERATE THE PARKWAY'S COMPLETION. THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE OFFER FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. THESE ARE DEFINITIVELY ADDRESSED IN A REPORT WE WILL LEAVE WITH YOUR STAFF AND INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: THE WIDENING OF u.s. ROUTE 250 WEST FROM E~STREET TO ROUTE 637 IN IVY. o o A ROADWAY ANALYSIS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO U.S. 250 EAST FROM ITS INTERCHANGE AT INTERSTATE 64 EASTWARD TO THE FLUVANNA COUNTY LINE. PARTICULAR ATTENTION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THAT SEGMENT FROM THE INTERSTATE TO THE o RIVANNA VILLAGE. '~ CONTINU~~THE PROCESS OF CLOSING CROSSOVERS ALONG U.S. 29 NORTH AS RECOMMENDED IN A VDOT STUDY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON MAY 10, 197~D REAFFIRMED BY THE BOARD ON NOVEMBER 8, 1989. 'N~ o FINALIZt THE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR ROUTE 20 SOUTH IN ORDER TO PROVIDE GENERAL ALIGNMENT IMPROVEMENTS TO THIS ROADWAY. o THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE NORTH/SOUTH CONNECTION BETWEEN ROUTE 250 AND ROUTE 240, EITHER THROUGH AN IMPROVED ALIGNMENT OF ROUTE 240 FROM ROUTE 250 NORTHWARD TO ROUTE 810, INCLUDING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CSX RAILROAD UNDERPASS, OR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROUTE 240-ROUTE 250 CONNECTOR ROAD RECOMMENDED IN THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. o DEVELOPMENT OF FUNCTIONAL PLANS FOR ROUTE 20 NORTH WHICH SHOULD IDENTIFY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS THAT ADDRESS SIGHT DISTANCE AND CURVATURE DEFICIENCIES. o DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN PLANS FOR THE WIDENING OF FONTAINE AVENUE FROM JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE T~ROUTE ~---- 29 BYPASS INTERCHANGE. o THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN INTERCHANGE OF INTERSTATE 64 AT AVON STREET (ROUTE 742). WE KNOW OUR LIST OF PROJECTS WILL TAKE MANY YEARS TO COMPLETE WITH AVAILABLE FUNDING. BUT, WE ARE CONCERNED THAT THE COUNTY LOST MORE FUNDING FOR ITS PRIMARY ROAD PROJECTS THAN THE CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT DID AS A WHOLE. WE URGE YOU TO RETAIN A FAIR SHARE OF DISTRICT FUNDS FOR COUNTY PROJECTS IN FUTURE FUNDING SO THE PROJECTS ON OUR LIST CAN BE REALIZED. WE AGAIN THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY AND IF QUESTIONS ARISE, OR IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED REGARDING OUR RECOMMENDATIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT ME OR MEMBER OF OUR COUNTY STAFF. ALBEMARLE COUNTY SIX YEAR PRIMARY ROAD PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION The County Board of Supervisors submits the following comments and recommendations for projects to be considered by VDOT in its six Year Primary Allocation Plan: 1. Place the highest priority on undertaking Charlottesville Area Transportation Study (CATS) projects which are eligible for the Primary Program. These projects include: (a) widening of Route 29 North, (b) widening of Route 250 West; and, (c) widening of Route 29 Business (Fontaine Avenue) . 2. Undertake these projects in sequence as called for in the joint resolution between the City, County, and University dated February 2, 1992 and agreed to by VDOT. Widen Route 29 North from the northern corporate limits of Charlottesville to the South Fork Rivanna River. This project should include interchanges at Hydraulic, Greenbrier and Rio Roads as considered necessary in the Route 29 North Corridor D.E.I.S. At a minimum, the necessary right-of-way for the interchanges should be acquired with the initial widening project. This project is considered the highest priority. In relation to Route 29 North improvements and as considered necessary in the D.E.I.S., the County recommends the construction of the Meadow Creek Parkway. Request that the Virginia Department of Transportation evaluate development of the Meadow Creek Parkway as a primary road if this will provide the most immediate funding opportunity. Construct Meadow Creek in accordance with the recommendations of the County's Comprehensive Plan. This is considered a high priority. 3. Close Route 29 crossovers consistent with the previously endorsed priorities (Attachment 1). This priority list of closings is based on the "Route 29 North Corridor Study", adopted by the Board on May 10, 1979 and reaffirmed by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on November 8, 1989. To date six of the total 13 recommended for closure have been closed. Of the remaining seven, three will be closed as part of the Route 29 widening project. Funds should be provided to close the remaining four crossovers. 4. Continue functional planning work on Route 20 South. Initial functional plans are under a second review by VDOT staff. Particular emphasis should be placed on the impact of improvements to the Route 20 South corridor as it is designated a State Scenic Byway and County Scenic Highway. 5. Improve the alignment of Route 240 from Route 250 northward to Route 810 in Crozet including improvements to the CSX railroad underpass. In response to previous requests by the County, functional plans have been developed for Route 240 from Route 250 north to Crozet and east to Route 250. The plans call for improving the horizontal and vertical alignment of the road for both north-south and east-west segments. Both segments would be 24 feet wide with two lane roads. A proposed Route 240-Route 250 connector road recommended in the County's Comprehensive Plan should be considered as an alternative to upgrading the existing alignment of Route 240. 6. Widen Route 250 West from Emmett street to Route 637 in Ivy. The Charlottesville Area Transportation study (CATS) recommends that Route 250 Business (Ivy Road) be widened to four lanes with a flush median (center turn lane) between the Bypass and Emmett Street. The Plan also calls for Route 250 to be widened to a four lane divided road from the Route 29/250 Bypass to Route 677, and four lane undivided from Route 677 to Route 637. The final design for these improvements are important because Route 250 is designated as an entrance corridor route and is considered a gateway to the County, City, and University and should reflect the design priorities as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and the Lewis Mountain Neighborhood Study. These improvements are recommended as Phase II improvements in CATS. Strong consideration should be given for the inclusion of these projects in the Six Year Primary Plan for ultimate funding and construction. All projects in the County recommended as Phase I improvements in CATS are already programmed for development in either the Six Year Primary or Secondary Road Plan. The County recommends development of this project in three phases. These are listed in priority order below: 1. Emmett Street to Route 29/250 Bypass 2. Bypass to Route 677 3. Route 677 to Route 637 (in Ivy). 7. Widen Route 29 Business (Fontaine Avenue) from the Route 29 Bypass to Jefferson Park Avenue. This would include a segment in the City from Jefferson Park Avenue to the corporate limits. Design plans should be developed in coordination with the City, County, and University from the Route 29 interchange to Jefferson Park Avenue (JPA). This improvement is recommended as a Phase IV project in CATS. CATS recommends widening the road to four lanes. Currently, Fontaine Avenue carries 12,980 vehicle trips per day. Development of the University Real Estate Foundation property for office and service related uses is anticipated to generate over 5,700 additional vehicle trips. with the development of the UREF office park development, the coordination of improvements along Fontaine from 1-64 to Jefferson Park Avenue in the primary and urban system are essential. 8. Conduct a systematic study of Route 250 East from the Interstate Route 64 interchange to the Fluvanna County line, with particular attention given to the segment from the interchange to the Rivanna Village. Due to the potential for increased growth in this area and the designation of the Rivanna Village that would be served by this road, there will be increasing traffic demands on Route 250. This study should provide recommendations for road improvements that will be needed to maintain an adequate level of service. 9. Conduct a systematic study of Route 20 North from Route 250 East to the Orange County line. Current traffic counts indicated that there are 3,100 vehicle trips per day on this road. There are numerous locations with substandard design, including intersections with insufficient site distance and existing alignments not meeting vertical and/or horizontal curvature standards. 10. Develop a priority list of spot safety improvements for primary routes. This list would be developed by County staff and the VDOT resident engineer and would be used to request improvements in future six Year Primary Road Plans. 11. The County continues to recommend the construction of an interchange on Interstate Route 64 at Avon Street. ATTACHMENT 1 Recommended priority for crossover closings: 1. * 2. * 3. * 4. 5. * 6. * 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Dominion Drive, #9 Better Living Furniture, #16 Kegler's, #15 South of Rivanna Industrial Park, #33 (closed) South of Holly Memorial Garden, #26 (closed) North of Route 643 crossover, #2l (closed) Fabrics Unlimited, #35 Near County Line, #45 North of Route 763 Crossover, #41 (closed) North of Route 763 Crossover, #42 (closed) North of Route 763 Crossover, #43 North of Route 643 Crossover, #20 Crossover at Maupin's Store, #27 (closed) Notes: * Along section of Route 29 North to be reconstructed. ~, S~ 5)" \e-\ t~- 'COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE ~~.l ft2.C. r2lE.:2.rIJLaj.~.7.::J)- ~ lit,..\, M'\;:l () IC,:.:)') I iI' \, ,,' ','I.. 11\ \ -r'">..._,., , . . J I . \ I '. . ;".; (""[',' ---',.':'" 1..1 ~..... ..~,_:J \....."',. ',' \,1' \ '.-, ,{-30f:i~J?..OF SUFEF?V;SO~S Rt. 1 Box l~u~ . Keswick~ Va. 22947 Mar-ch 7 ~ 1992 David P. Bowerman, Chair-man~ County Boar-d of Super-visor-s A1bemar-Ie County 401 Mclntir-e Road Char-Iottesville, Va 229<)2-4596 Re: Ar-chitectur-al Review Boar-d Dear- David: Since the opening of our- second stor-e, The Happy Cook, Inc. this last september- in Richmond and additional need for- time on a fr-ee-Iance ar-t business, I feel that I must r-esign my position on the Ar-chitectur-al Review Boar-d. The impor-tance of maintaining a high level of attention to r-etail in these tr-ying times cannot be taken lightly. I appr-eciate the oppor-tunity the Board has given me to ser-ve the county this past year. F?~wdL" James G. Car-swell CC Lindstr-om COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Robert W. Tucker Jr., County Executive Hoyt B. Alford III, civil Engineer 9 March 1992 Parcel Dedication Along Berkmar Drive Attached is the certificate of Plat and the original and a copy of a plat for a three foot wide sliver of County land along Berkmar Drive behind Rio Hill Shopping Center. This dedication of county property is due to the Virginia Department of Transportation requirement that additional right-of-way be provided for the additional guardrail along Berkmar Drive. Please have the Chairman of the Board sign the certificate of Plat. If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 3248. HBAI Attachments COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE. j:~LIU{-I~t MAR 1 0 1992 ) ~ ~ '. ,.,,, ". } ~ ~ .... ~-'~ ,. J.'&,' '":',, .; "1", !,i"'<l; U EXECUTIVE OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF PLAT The attached plat, and courses and distances description made by Roudabush, Gale & Assoc., Inc., certified Land Surveyor, Charlottesville, Virginia, dated August 28, 1990, and last revised January 10, 1992 of the lands of Rio Hill Shopping Center, situate in Charlottesville Magisterial District, of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, showing also Tax Map 45, Parcel 94 being a portion of the land acquired by The County of Albemarle by deed dated October 5, 1990 from William W. Stevenson, Trustee for the 659 Land Trust; William W. Stevenson and Carol W. Stevenson, husband and wife; William W. Stevenson; Alton F. Martin, Jr., Executor Under the will of Alton F. Martin, Sr; and Encore Investors Limited Partnership, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle county, Virginia, in Deed Book 1124, Page 245. The attached plat also showing Tax Map 45, Parcel 95A, being a portion of the land acquired by the County School Board of Albemarle, by deed recorded in Deed Book 1128, page 650 with a plat attached and recorded in Deed Book 1128, page 654, is hereby confirmed and submitted of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office. Given under our hands this Jrat day of ~~ 1992. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE By:t()p:;f;/d~- SCHOOL BOARD OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY BY: FIRST INTERSTATE CHARLOT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: CO. p~ dent AND STATE OF VIRGIN~ ~ITY/COUNTY OF jnbtmafk- , to-wit: I, {fA-', r:!..a..-re- , a Notary publ~c, in the State , Virginia, do here y certify that LXi v,-d.. p, 31vJ<.//M.'f"\ Jrf>i 1J5u VlSU" for the County of Albemarle, whose name is signed on the foregoing certificate of confirmation by owners, and Plat, bearing date of the 28th day of August, 1990, last revised January 10, 1992, has acknowledged the same before me. Given under my hand this ~ day of ~a~ 1992. Notary Public My Commission Expires: IMaj t CJ I /9').1; STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY/COUNTY OF , to-wit: I,lDnlQ "i. ~ThMD(\ ,a Notar Public, in the State o~ Virginia, do hereby certify that \ \ QtLlf L , Cho.J r (Y')Q() for the School Board of Albemarle Count , whose name is signed on the foregoing certificate of confirmation by owners, and Plat, bearing date of the 28th day of August, 1990, last revised January 10, 1992, has acknowledged the same before me. Given under my hand this ;)nCl day of mcl d~h 1992. JDfU'o.- '\j, --T)C0BOrl Notary Public My Commission Expires: Or" i \ \ I j \ qq;) STATE OF OHIO COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA, to-wit: I, ~~ ,a Notary Public, in the State of Ohio, do hereby certify that Lawrence C. Sherman, President of Interstate Centers Co., whose name is signed on the foregoing certificate of confirmation by owners, and Plat, bearing date of the 28th day of August, 1990, last revised January 10, 1992, has acknowledged the same before me. Given under my hand this ~ day of ~~ 1992. ~m{~ Notary Public My Commission Expires: q~d LINDA Ie. HUBBEll. Notary Public State of Ohio My cammIssIon expires Feb. 8, 1993 STATE OF OHIO COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA, to-wit: I, 11/1//;/1111 ::;'c);/..L , a Notary Public, in the State of Ohio, do hereby certify that Donald M. Robiner, President of South Coast Centers, Inc., whose name is signed on the foregoing certificate of confirmation by owners, and Plat, bearing date of the 28th day of August, 1990, last revised January 10, 1992, has acknowledged the same before me. Given under my hand this .~ 1992. of N LBH.2 CERTPLAT.FIR WILLIAM 1. SCHiLL, NO\3.ry Public Residence - Cuyahoga County Stale WKleJurisdiction, Ohio My Commission Expires April 24, 1996 2 - '" ... G: D:: I.LI ::z ~ ,I 0 ,I .., Z, !::: 2. \t') Of' r-==______ I cn- -l - .0 ~ 2 i= ;h~w:;1 ;30~~; :s~i".;~ . ~ ~i;jS~,,~ . f !"~e~~i : ~i~~~~"~ ; ~ ~~!5~ ~ ih.r~~!~ ~~h~o :z:!w..;e ~:Uhh -':\.! .0 o .... ~ili~U i~u;~~ ~ g;IS",,; ~ ~JSi3;g $ ~~!"~S~j ~ ;~i!J!d~~ I l:l"~"wll" o ~If~or~~~~ ~'t 5f~"" ~E!in~; !:n~:!lS~ .s .0 ~ e s:. w ~g;gw~i'" cr 'j ~." .ll....... S Owo"'~. W <( ill 1:1.... ~ . :s~~",,;i " ~ W ..zae.. lOt I cr ~ ~ ~Q;j~i,;! . ~ <( 0 ri~ol!s~ ~' , ~ ! ij!jh~j ~ ~ ~ i ~~~i!iChl ~ ::l 0 Ihor.5!!=- (II 8 'tl!l'3;~e:::{' <( ~~".. ... 0 ,~;~U~ill oc !~if~~~! -- .----r r I I ~ - Q, - 0 10... ,.... -e 5 Ci .., wc> :::~ 0::15 Cl :Z:'", '" "'", ~'" "'..., .. I I I llc::;t 0::0: og O::Ci CD~ g \ ilJ 10; '"' '" vi IC"..I .... ~ :::: 10'''''0 o 1i")"'\O O.....:O~ CT'l""'cr.V") ~ b '" .In9Z- --I ;,~Z '99 + r''''r6 ~--"-''"-- ----- V'\ ~ I 6Ol~ 986 '11 ! i IVf6 lOd StdVl I 001 '~ ~t>'W 1/' 5 dIHSl:/3Nll:/Vd '011 ~ dIHSH3Nll:/Vd 'all ":JOSSV Oll:/ 311IM31101l:/VH:J ~ 31V1Sl:/31NI lSl:/I.:I _~ <( -~ o ~ oi~ ~, c>_ ~ ~(.) ","" Zw "'~ 1 w(f) &J:" t ffi~ :&i::lct::lJ,J<l: ~gO!:~ 1ZILi: ~u~-J;: :S<no~~.: i: <l: :::i z == C; LLI <n i::: ~ c> ';; :g wccl.LJ>a:: -<l:"t<:....do W ::l U ::3 :;: :2-:5 ~ :~... "OC5~ <.:) C1.. I- -- en CO.... I ,!: l!l ~.. Ii <.:) <l: I- >- 0 0 It: t! :S.., "0 O. Z OC> I-OCTIC;;I.&JOo .~<tE':' \ -!:I-ZOZ'ii'CTIcn-J(,J ....!!!a-t- at: <l: - ~ ::l"- -.. __ oCt'" ~ l: ~~~ --\\ 52 a:: Cla.. a.. <l: 0 .. co..,. C,!) ~ ~ t:" g: _ c '" - Cl lJ,J :r lAJ C\lC\l 0 _ 00_ . <n I- 0 (.) ~ '2! -_ 11 .QQN.. . -- ';\\....: c:t3 ~ :c: u I.&J ~ g~ ~ ~ ~ d~ ~~~ < - (I') lJ.. -J ~:> ::) "- I g: ::l!uJ<1l \ . -J~Cl Oa:: LLlCXlO~ "".. a..'Q:~j < D::oCt~1 i:;~cr~ -:z::~ 0'(._ a: IX -J>-:C:6:~ ~ ~ \\~;. ~i~~>i", ~ '& Cl ~ <l: ~ ~\~ c,\l'lIA II! c!J ,~ '0 U'J ~ ~~ ~ ~, 'Cfi,\ ::: ~~... ~"'U>0.\~~ i ~ s ~;...\ ~~ ... ~ ~ .,~ '\ ~ ""'''00 \ \ / / ,I .- a .. o ~~ II: CIl~ ~ ~ G: CD .. . 1&1"'0 .J~ f tn g< tn CD, ;J;:f, or ~ ~~Slll ,.;1, ~ ~ 'i... .~ 30 0 u " t ~ D. 0': ~,,~ N :lCIlCD :t ~...I~ !c; ~~~ li!; R: CD ~fa, CD >-Il)N IE": \, :;):l1Ii 8....0 \ ... ... ~ IS :c ~~ !ltW ~ alZl ~~ ffi ~f ,JW ~ w~ :ii E rim 5!~ .... i!i< = i3 ~ ~ g~ en C)~ Co eft ~ri ~lii ~... i~ iCi WIAI ~~ ~C>: I") , :: ~ 2~ .;.;, ....... ~ .OIONl....JI"Ot u z o j: <( o 0: o U l1J It It o 1L o l1J ~ O' It Q.. Q.. <( >- ., , it II .l:S ., " u ~~ irtt o 2~ 0'" ,- II ,~ 8 :s ,_ <t"O II '", 0 \ \ '" ~ i .., c>