HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201500028 Review Comments Special Use Permit 2015-10-02A
�jRGIl`IlA
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4176
October 2, 2015
Mr. Kelly Strickland
Shimp Engineering
201 E. Main St., Suite M
Charlottesville VA 22902
RE: SP201500028, SP201500029 Blue Ridge Swim Club
Dear Kelly --
Thank you for the recent application for these special use permits. Please find review comments
for both applications included in this letter.
Please see the attached re- submittal schedule for a list of dates on which you can submit your
revisions and responses to review comments (below and attached), as well as for possible
Planning Commission dates. (Please note that the listed dates are the earliest possible, but actual
dates need to be selected to suit the revision schedule for each project.)
Review Comments
Planning (Scott Clark)
The conceptual plan shows that the long, narrow portion of the parcel that contains the
entrance road would be part of the residential lot. Is there a particular reason for this
design other than the need to meet the 2 -acre minimum lot size?
The conceptual plan should show both existing and proposed tree /vegetation lines. Please
note the Historic Preservation comments below regarding screening of the new dwelling
from the historic pool area. Discussions about this topic have continued since those
comments were provided. We are currently considering a recommended condition that
would require a 50 -foot wooded buffer along the new property line adjacent to and
parallel to the pool. This buffer would require supplemental plantings, and we are
working on recommended tree sizes and densities. Please show that 50 -foot buffer depth
on the conceptual plan.
Your request for a special exception for the building -site shape is noted. Section
4.2.2(a)(3) states:
Special exception. Notwithstanding section 4.2.5, the rectangular shape required
by subsections (1) and (2) may be waived or modified by special exception under
section 31.8 upon the board of supervisors' consideration of the recommendation
from the Virginia Department of Health and information provided by the
developer showing that: (i) the parcel has an unusual size, topography, shape,
location or other unusual physical condition; (ii) no reasonable alternative
building site exists; and (iii) modifying or waiving the rectangular shape would
result in less degradation of the parcel or adjacent parcels than if those
dimensions were adhered to.
Please (1) contact Josh Kirtley at the Virginia Department of Health and obtain written
comments from him supporting the siting of the primary and backup septic fields on the
new parcel; (2) show those locations on the conceptual plan; and (3) provide a detailed
narrative addressing the "information provided by the developer" referred to in the
section quoted above.
Zoning (Amelia McCulley]
Please see attached memo.
Historic Resources /Architectural Review Board (Margaret Maliszewski)
The Blue Ridge Swim Club is listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
and the Virginia Landmarks Register. The pool is among the oldest known concrete
outdoor commercial swimming pools remaining or in use in both the state and the
country. The pool and its ancillary features (draw pipe, terra cotta pipes, drains, and
settling tank) are counted as the single structure that contributes to the significance of the
resource. The National Register Nomination Form states that "the property's location
and setting were selected for their rural and picturesque qualities, which have been
retained to the present day." The pool is situated in a naturalistic, wooded locale that
retains a high level of integrity of location, setting, feeling and association (aspects of
integrity as defined by the National Register).
The area proposed for the new single family residence is included in the boundaries of
the NRHP site. A new residence readily visible from the pool could have a negative
visual impact on the setting of the historic resource. Although the slope up to the
proposed house site is wooded, it is anticipated that tree removal to allow for construction
would result in a building that would be visible from below.
Among the methods available to ensure that the character and integrity of the setting are
maintained after the construction of a new building are: 1) build a building whose style is
consistent with the rustic character of the swim club and that blends with the surrounding
wooded area as viewed from the swimming pool, or 2) use wooded area to screen the
new building from the swimming pool. A wood frame pavilion recently constructed at the
site blends well with the surroundings. A house constructed with similar materials and
colors could similarly blend with the setting.
Alternatively, the appearance of the building would be less important if trees were added
to the house site to ensure that the new building is sufficiently screened when viewed
from the pool in the summer months (the time of year when the pool is in operation).
En inng (Max Greene)
No objection
Virginia Department of Transportation (Shelley Plaster)
Please see attached memo.
If we have not received a response from you within 30 days, we will contact you again. At that
time, you will be given 10 days to do one of the following: a) request withdrawal of your
application, b) request deferral of your application to a specific Planning Commission date as
mutually agreed to with staff, or c) request indefinite deferral and state your justification for
requesting the deferral. If none of these actions is taken, staff will schedule your application for
a public hearing based on the information provided with your original submittal.
Please be advised that, once a public hearing has been advertised, only one deferral prior to the
Planning Commission's public hearing will be allowed during the life of the application. The
only exception to this rule will be extraordinary circumstances, such as a major change in the
project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been
brought to the applicant's attention. As always, an applicant may request deferral at the Planning
Commission meeting.
Please feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. I would be
happy to meet with you to discuss the issues raised by this application.
Sincerely,
Scott Clark
Senior Planner, Planning Division
Or ALp�r
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Scott Clark, Senior Planner
From: Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator
Date: September 24, 2015
Subject: SP 2015 -028 and SP 2015 -029 Blue Ridge Swim Club and Camp — review
comments
I have reviewed the initial submittal (of the new applications which were originally SP 2013 -024)
and have the following comments:
(Prior comment not addressed) The proposed well on the existing conceptual plan
appears to be in the area proposed for the new lot. Please ask the applicant to clarify
the location of the well on what will remain the property of the swim club / camp rather
than the residential lot. A well is an accessory use and by definition, needs to remain on
the parcel with the primary use it serves. It would be helpful if the plan were revised to
reflect current Health Department approvals for well and septic areas.
2. (Prior comment) Please keep in mind that development of the proposed residential lot
can result in tree removal and disturbance. If some of these wooded areas are critical to
the swim club and camp, you may wish to include notes on the plan and conditions
which limit their disturbance. The applicant's narrative states that vegetative buffers will
not be disturbed. However, that is not clear from the plan. The current condition #1
which limits clearing is somewhat vague and could be better clarified.
3. It may be advisable to remove the residential lot from the special use permit, to clarify
that the swim club and camp use is not permitted on the new lot. It is not clear if the
applicant is willing to accept a condition that would limit by -right uses (such as further
residential use) while the uses under these special use permits are operational.
4. The close proximity of the new parking area with respect to the southeastern property
line for the proposed lot brings up the question of whether the parking area can be
completed as previously proposed.
5. Please ask the applicant to review the plan as follows:
a. (Prior comment not addressed) Show the location of the well and septic field for
the swim club /camp;
b. Clarify the location of the woodline and of critical slopes.