Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201500069 Approval - County 2015-10-14�pF A vt�r�1Q COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project title: Project file number: Plan preparer: Owner or rep.: Plan received date: (Rev. 1) (Rev. 2) (Rev. 3) Date of comments: (Rev. 1) (Rev. 2) (Rev. 3) Reviewers Road and Drainage Plan Review Hillbrook SUB- 2015 -00069 Shimp Engineering, PC Hilltop Partners, LLC 20 April 2015 6 June 2015 27 July 2015 9 September 2015 13 May 2015 26 June 2015 26 August 2015 8 October 2015 Justin Deel This plan has adequately addressed the below comments and is approved. You may contact Ana Kilmer (Albemarle County Department of Community Development) at ext. 3246 for further information on bonding procedures, 1. Please show limits of sidewalk replacement and CG -6 removal. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 2. Please explain note "Area to be Vacated 4,740 SF" on existing conditions sheet. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 3. Please show and label managed slopes. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 4. Show stationing at 50' minimum on plans and profiles. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 5. Please provide dimensions for and clearly show extent of the private storm sewer easement along Old Brook Road. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 6. Should there be a separate easement for sidewalks as they are outside of the street ROW? (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 7. Please label proposed grade on road profile. Show and label crossdrains and utilities on profiles. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 8. Provide a drainage plan. Please show excess drainage will not be flowing into Old Brook Road. Provide storm sewer profile(s). What will inlet 5A be capturing? Pre -cast inlets will obviously lessen your curb entrance radii, do these have to be placed on the entrance? (Rev. 1) Comment partially addressed. Drainage area plan not found. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. 9. Provide details and profiles for proposed new storm sewer on Old Brook Road. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 10. Although this is intended to be a private street, VDOT approval is required for intersection and Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 utility improvements along Old Brook Road. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 11. Provide pavement design calculations. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. 12. Provide sidewalk detail. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed. Revision 1 Comments: 13. Please reflect the requested changes to the overall SWM /drainage plan from the 26 June 2015 VSMP review letter. (Rev. 2) Comment partially addressed. Please reflect additional changes requested in the 20 August 2015 VSMP review letter. (Rev. 2) Comment addressed. Revision 2 Comments: 14. Please adequately address all VDOT comments. Provide evidence of ASCA approval. Please address the following comment provided by Ellie Ray, Planning: The note below the Wooded Area Tabulation references a 26,707 SF conservation area, while the preserved wooded space is labeled as 23,764 SF; please clarify and revise, if necessary. (Rev. 2) Comment not addressed. (Rev. 3) Comment addressed. The 'new canopy' number in the tree canopy calculation doesn't match that provided in the Landscape Schedule; verify and revise. Please address the following comment provided by Robbie Gilmer, Fire & Rescue: Fire Flow test required. Fire Flow needed is 1,000 gpm @ 20 psi. (Rev. 2) I have not yet received feedback concerning the provided fire flow calculation from Fire & Rescue. I will let you know once that information is received. (Rev. 3) "No objection." — Robbie Gilmer File: SUB201500069 Eng. Road Plan Review R3.doc