HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-09-11
FIN A L
September 11, 1991
10:00 A.M. **
Room 7, County Office Building
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) *Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) Approval of Minutes: April 3, 1991.
7) Highway Matters:
a) Other Highway Matters.
8) SP-90-102,' Centel (Deferred from August 21, 1991).
9) Consideration of Amendment to Albemarle County Service Authority Service
Areas to Provide Expanded Public Water and Sewer Service in the
Scottsville Area.
10) E-911 Road Naming Recommendation, Presentation of.
11) Cable Television, Discussion of.
12) Approval change in Rental Rate for County Office Building Meeting Rooms.
13) 1992-93/1996-97 Capital Improvement Program Requests and Revenues.
14) Executive Session: Personnel.
15) Work Session: Solid Waste.
16) 3:00 p.m. - Joint Meetinl! with the School Board, Room 5/6.
a) Murray High School, Discussion of.
b) Capital Improvements Program.
c) Report on. Opening of Schools.
d) Meals Tax Brochures and Presentors Guidelines.
e) School Division Leave Experiment.
f) Other Matters.
17) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
18) Discussion of Meeting on September 6 with Italian Visitors.
19) Adjourn.
**Note change in beginning time of meeting.
~,...
~,
I,
II
),
CON S E N T
AGE N D A
FOR INFORMATION:
5.1 JAUNT'S Report of Services and Expenditures for Albemarle County for
period between October 1, 1990 and June 30, 1991.
5.2 Memorandum dated September 4, 1991, from Police Chief John F. Miller
entitled "Mobile Watch".
5.3 Notice dated August 30, 1991, from Virginia Power re: Application filed
with the State Corporation Commission for an Expedited Increase in Rates.
5.4 Memorandum dated September 5, 1991, from V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director
of Planning and Community Development, re: "Federal Express
Development- Monitoring Report."
5.5 Letter dated September 3, 1991, from Dan S. Roosevelt, Resident Highway
Engineer entitled "Current Projects-Construction Schedule."
5.6 Copy of 1991 Statement of Assessed Values for Local Tax Purposes for
Railroads and Interstate Pipeline Transmission Companies from the Virginia
Department of Taxation, on file in the Clerk's Office. ~'
FOR APPROVAL:
5.7, Statements of Expenses for the Director of Finance, Sheriff, Common-
wealth's Attorney and Regional Jail for the Month of August, 1991.
,1:"
,- ,~
~::-- '. ._~ '------,.-- ---_._.__._-----------~--~~'""
--- ---------------
, '
,
! I
,
',I
.-~=-.~
~-c',-,"",-.,.~~~
Edward H. Bam, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901.4596
(804) 296.5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
MEMORANDUM
Charlotte Y Humphm
,Jack <Jouett
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F Perkms
While Hall
F. R. (Hick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T Way
Scottsvdle
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
and Community Development
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
DATE: September 12, 1991
SUBJECT: Board Actions of September 11, 1991
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting held on September 11, 1991, the
following actions were taken:
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
The Board requested a status report on the Albemarle High School Field House on
October 2.
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Memorandum dated September 4, 1991, from Police Chief
John F. Miller entitled "Mobile Watch". The Chairman is to write a letter of
appreciation to the organizers (Ms. Lee Catlin, Adelphia Cable, Centel and
Virginia Power) of the program.
Agenda Item No. 5.4. Memorandum dated September 5, 1991, from V. Wayne
Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community Development, re: "Federal Express
Development- Monitoring Report." The Board reiterated its position of May 8,
1991, that the deadline for closing the existing entrance is November 1, 1991.
The Board also emphasized that it does not intend to give any further considera-
tion to this project.
Agenda Item No.6. Approval of Minutes: April 3, 1991. On page 39 (copy
attached), Item No. 12, Mr. Perkins asked why all of the CIP Coordinator's
salary was charged to the Agnor-Hurt School project. The thought of the Board
was that a portion this person's salary would be charged to each individual
project.
Memo To:
Date:
Page 2
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
September 13, 1991
Agenda Item No. 7a. Other Highway Matters. There were none.
Agenda Item No.8. SP-90-102, Centel (Deferred from August 21, 1991). The
Board accepted the applicant's request for withdrawal without prejudice.
Agenda Item No.9. Consideration of Amendment to Albemarle County Service
Authority Service Areas to Provide Expanded Public Water and Sewer Service in
the Scottsville Area. The Board set a public hearing for October 9 to consider
amending the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority
to include TM 130A(1), Parcel 64B on the southwest corner of Route 6 and Route
726 across from the Scottsvilleshopping center for water and sewer service.
Agenda Item No. 10. E-911 Road Naming Recommendation, Presentation of.
The Board adopted the attached lists (Attachments A & B) of road name recommen-
dations by the E911 Road Naming Committee for public and private roads in Albe-
marle County, with the two changes on Attachment A:
Page 4 - Route 53 "Thoroughfare Gap Rd" - change to "Thomas Jefferson Parkway"
Page 9 - Route 674 from 673 to 614 "Wyant Ridge Rd" - change to "Sugar Ridge
Road".
The Board adopted the procedure outlined in the attached memorandum of
September 4, 1991, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., for persons requesting changes to
approved road names and naming new/unnamed roads. The Board also authorized the
Chairman to send Certificates of Appreciation to the E911 Road Naming Committee
members.
Agenda Item No. 11. Cable Television, Discussion of. The Board concurred
with the recommendation that staff meet with the City's cable TV franchise
committee to gather the necessary information to consider whether it is in the
County's best interest to franchise cable TV and, if so, whether it should be
done jointly or separately from the City.
Agenda Item No. 12. Approve change in Rental Rate for County Office Build-
ing Meeting Rooms. Approved the following recommendations for changes in rental
rates for usage of the County Office Building:
1. Implement the attached fee structure effective immediately for anyone
reserving rooms after the date of Board adoption;
2. School/County groups shall be further defined as those having a specific
departmental budget designation in the County Budget; and
3. Rental rates to be reviewed annually in Staff Service's budget as part of
the budget process.
Date:
Page 3
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
September 13, 1991
Memo To:
Agenda Item No. 13. 1992-93/1996-97 Capital Improvement Program Requests
and Revenues. If the Planning Commission makes a recommendation at its' public
hearing on October 8, the Board wants to hold a work session on either October 9
or the afternoon of October 16.
Agenda Item No. 15. Work Session: Solid Waste. The Board authorized
staff to proceed with expanding the Voluntary Curbside Recycling Pilot Program
to 3000 households if it can be done within the budgeted amount. The Board also
requested staff to report back at the September 18 meeting on how to address
hauler collection costs with regard to the program. A list of items the Board
asked to be addressed sometime in the future will follow under separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 15a. Appointments
Reappointed Messrs. Dan M. Maupin, Samuel Page and Montie Pace to the Land
Use Classifications Appeals Board with said term to expire on September 1, 1993.
Appointed Ms. Roxanne White as the County Executive's designee to the JAUNT
Board.
Agenda Item No. 16a. Murray High School, Discussion of. No action.
Agenda Item No. 16b. School Capital Improvements Program. No action.
Agenda Item No. 16c. Report on Opening of Schools. No action.
Agenda Item No. 16d. Meals Tax Brochures and Presentors Guidelines. The
following changes were made:
In the brochure, in the bottom box on the inside cover, insert the word
tlcapitaltl before tlcosts of school facilities and debt.tI
In the presentors outline, Section III.A.2a. delete the word tlannuallytl at
the end of the sentence.
Agenda Item No. 16e. School Division Leave Experiment. No action.
Agenda Item No. 17. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
The JLARC Commission on Population and Growth is holding a public forum at
the Holiday Inn on Afton Mountain on October. The Board requested staff to
prepare a statement on local land use management powers for Board review on
October 2. The Board also requested staff to find out from the TJPDC who will
be allowed to speak at the meeting.
Memo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
September 13, 1991
Date:
Page 4
The Board suspended its Rules of Procedure for the purpose of reconsidering
SP-91-29, CBC Partners. The Board then voted to rehear SP-91-29, CBC Partners,
and deferred the rehearing indefinitely to allow the applicant and staff to
coordinate materials and set a date. When this hearing is rescheduled, the
Board members wish to receive a complete copy of the staff report.
Agenda Item No. 18. Discussion of Chairman's Meeting on September 6 with
Italian Visitors. Mr. Bowie stated that a formal letter from the Mayor of Prato
is forthcoming which requests that the Student Exchange Program be continued
starting in 1992. When the letter is received, he will respond in writing which
he will bring to the Board for its concurrence.
LEN:ec
cc: Robert Brandenburger
Richard Huff, II
George R. St. John
v/File
Dd.'outed to Bo;;rc1' , q -0 -:JLd
Ai!,enda It.ern No, q J. 03J.O.. L?3
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
,.....,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
September 4, 1991
of Supervisors ~
County Executive ~I
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
RE: Recommendations of the E911 Road Naming Committee
Attached are two lists of road names recommended by the E911 Road
Naming Committee for your review and adoption. One list provides
recommendations for public roads and the other list provides road
names for private roads. A large scale map of the public road
names is available in the Albemarle County Planning and Community
Development Department for your review prior to our meeting on
September 11. It will also be available at the meeting.
Staff recommends your adoption of the attached lists and approval
of the following procedure for naming roads:
o Changes to approved road names: Requests to change
Board approved road names must be submitted to the
Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community
Development and must be accompanied by a petition signed
by a majority of the landowners along such road.
Petitions will be reviewed by staff and, if acceptable,
will administratively approve the change. These changes
cannot be implemented until the County has assumed
operational control and maintenance of the locator system
scheduled for the summer of 1992.
o New/unnamed roads: All proposed road names for new or
unnamed roads coming under the E9l1 Locator System will
be submitted to the Planning and Community Development
Department by the developer/applicant for review,
administrative approval and entry into the locator
system. This procedure is incorporated in the
development review process and will ensure accuracy of
the locator system.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Cilimberg or me.
RWT,Jr/dbm
91.125
Attachment
Non-Arbitrage Program \.the "Proceeds Agreement. ), ,(1) an exeCULeu
copy of the Use of Proceeds Certificate in the form attached
hereto as Appendix C, (e) a transcript of the other customary
documents not listed above, and (f) the proceeds of VPSA's bonds.
;1
I
4. This Bond Sale Agreement shall take effect on April 5, 1991.
Mr. Bowie said this is the last bond issue that he is willing to support
without going to a general bond referendum.
Agenda Item No. 12. Appropriation Request: Agnor-Hurt Elementary
School.
L
Mr. Jones said the Agnor-Hurt Elementary School is estimated to cost
$6,816,000 which does not include Berkmar Drive improvements. Funding for
this school is included in the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) bond
issue along with funding for Berkmar,Drive ($950,000) and Recreational Faci-
lities ($35,000). The School Board received favorable bids which were
approximately $1.50 per square foot less than the recently completed Cale
Elementary School. This low bid allows the project to absorb the original
underestimate on land purchase costs and still be within the amount approved
in the Capital Improvement Program budget. Since there has already been an
appropriation in the amount of $1,735,000 made for this project, the Board is
requested to approve an additional $5,081,000. The additional amount needed
for the Berkmar Drive improvements will be requested after acquisition of
right-of-way and design approval is complete, so more accurate cost figures
are available.
Motion was offered by Mrs. Humphris, seconded by Mr. Way, to adopt the
following resolution approving an appropriation in the amount of $5,081,000 to
fund construction of the Agnor-Hurt Elementary School:
FISCAL YEAR: 90/91
FUND: CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR AGNOR-HURT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CONSTRUCTION.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION
1900060215312300-PROF. SERVICES-ARCH. & ENG.
1900060215312365 CIP COORDINATOR
1900060215580000 MISC EXPENSES
1900060215800200 FURNITURE & FIXTURES
1900060215800605 CONSTRUCTION
1900060215800670 UTILITIES
1900060215800750 LAND ACQUISITION
1900060215999999 CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
AMOUNT
$ 322,884.00
40,352.00
7,500.00
220,000.00
3,086,000.00
40,000.00
1,153,394.00
210,870.00
$5,081,000.00
i
t,
REVENUE
2900041000410500 LOAN PROCEEDS
TOTAL
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
$5,081,000.00
$5,081,000.00
Roll was called and the foregoing motion carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Bain, Bowerman, Bowie, Mrs. Humphris, Mr. Perkins and Mr. Way.
None.
Agenda Item No. 13. Approval of Governor's Early Retirement Program.
l-< l-< l-< l-<
~ Q) ~ ~
l:: a 0. 0 0
::l Q) .erl lIl.erl .erl
Ul 0'> rrJ III ~ rrJ rrJ
l-< l-<-.-{ rl rl l-< ,.-{ -l< l-<..-{
I rrJ Q)'1J Q) (l).0.Q)'1JQ) Q)'C Q)
.e o.a 0'> o.aO'> o.a 0'>
U +J l-< +J l-< +J l-< +J l-<
+J IlllllrrJ S:::~1ll III ru III III ru
rd a rl~.e Q)arl~.e rl~.e
Ul z (l).UU p::;.e (I). U U (I). U U
r.tl
r.tl rl
... ru
-.-{
!:l '1J rl rl
r.tl a III ru ru
Ul +J ~-.-{ -.-{
0 III rl'1J '1J
Il< ::l o.a a
0 U +J +J
p:; l-< III III
Il< l-< ~ ~ ~
~ a U U
a .e
.e l-< l-<
l-< ~ ~
Q) Q) a a
'M s::: o..e .e
I-i Q) a
... 0'> III Q) -l< Q)
l-< rlS:::~ s:::~
rd OQ) (I). a Q) a Q)
.e 00'> ~O'> ~O'>
. U .l-< +J l-< l-<
~ III rd s::: III rd III ru
0 a rl.e Q)rl.e rl.e
::E: z {l).U P::;{I).U (l).U
Q)
0'>
l-<
ru
.e
U
~
::l Q) rl
Ul 0'> ru
l-< ,.-{
ru '1J
.e a
U Q) Q) Q) +J
+J S S E III
rd a rd rd ru ~
Ul Z Ul Ul Ul U
Q)
.e
+J
r.tl III
r.tl +J S ~
... .e ~ rl
S 0'> E 0.
E-t ::l rl -.-{ ,.-{
~ S rd rd X l-<
..-{ l-<-.-{ l-< ru ~
Ul X ~'1J+J E 0
r.tl rd a a III .e
p:; S .e+J l-<
Il< III I ~ l-<
Q)l-<~ l-< ::l Q) 0 Q)
0'>::lQ) Q)U~ O'>.e 0.
l-<a+J 0. M l-<
rd.e rd l-< rd Q) Q) 0
..c:: l-< ~~rl .el::+J III
U Q) Marl U a rd (I).
'M l:: Q) ...c:: (I). l-<
I-i Q) rlaE rl rl J Q)
... 0'> ru ~-.-{ rl Q) ru +J .Q
l-< -M +J (I). s:::~ '.-{~..c::
rd '1J0l-< a Q) '1J M 0'> rl
..c:: a 0 Q) O'>~ a . -.-{ rl
U +J .:> +J III l-< Q) +Jrlru ru
~ III r-- a s::: ~ rd S III rl l-< .e
0 a ::lrl Q) rl .e -.-{ ~(I).+J III
::E: Z U{I).@ p::; 0. U +J U~1Il
S
~
..-{
l-<
a
Q) . III +J
rl rl III 0. ..-{
rd .Q III s::: ~ '1J
S:::rl rd 0. a a ~
a rd +J ::l ,.-{ l-< <l;
-.-{ l-< III -.-{ 0 +JO'> III
+J ~ s::: l-< l-< ru s::: Q)
rd +J a rd 0'> N Q) a .e
U rl-.-{ .e ..-{ +J ..-{ +J
~~+J U III s::: rd +J
'1J U rd ru :> ru 4-<
Q) N . s::: III 0'> -.-{ N a
'1J ..-{ U rd s::: l-< l-< -.-{
. s::: l:: ,.-{ l-< a a 0. s::: Q)
III ru rd :> Q)..-{ ru 0'>
Q) 0'> ..-{ +J +J O'>l-< 0'> ro
>, -.-{ rl l-< U Q) ru s::: a l-< III
+J U ru 0 :> N ..-{ a ~
s::: l:: l:: -.-{ ..I<: III
Z ::l Q) a l-< rl l-< s::: ru Q) III I-i
0 a 0'> -.-{ a ru a rd E III ::l 0
H U rd+J U 0'> III a 4-<
E-t " rd III ..-{ rl l-< +J Q) ,.-{
cJ rl H .e Q) 0. +J ro a ..-{ s::: 0'> +J
a H +J l-< ::l ..-{ -.-{ 4-< -.-{ ,.-{ s:::
H a H ::l U 0 rlU'1J a III rl Q)
... ..c:: a Q) l-< a 0 !:: l-< ::l Q) P::;
H U '1J :>< l-< 0'> P< III rd P<.Q p::; -l<
Ul Ul !::
Ul ru
~ H
H H H >
CJ H H H H H >
~.
IA\
JAUnT X
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
i
JAUNT, INC.
1138 EAST HIGH STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA_ 22901
Administration: (804) 296-3184 or 296-4980
Operations: (804) 296-6174
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
Distributed to Board: q 1& III
t,genda Item No. 9 I, 6 ~ I Lf?} )..
Bob Tucker
Albemarle County Executive
Albemarle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596
August 28th, 1991
Dear Bob:
As part of our effort to keep local governments abreast of
the services provided in each locality, the JAUNT Board has
directed that a quarterly report of services and expenditures be
sent to each local government that supports JAUNT. Attached you
will find a report covering the first three quarters of JAUNT's
fiscal year. Please direct copies to the Board of Supervisors if
you feel it is appropriate.
We would welcome comments and questions on these reports.
Yours truly,
~/,
, '()fU1/~v
.onna Shaunesey
Assistant Director
. .
,
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
SERVICE PROVIDED 10-1-90 TO 6-30-91
PUBLIC TRIPS
1st Q 2nd Q 3rd Q
Urban area handicapped
3605 3727 3734
Rural area handicapped
2149 2126 2504
scottsville route
883 863 994
TOTAL PUBLIC TRIPS
6637 6716 7232
AGENCY TRIPS
TOTAL AGENCY TRIPS
3191
2880
3420
TOTAL (PUBLIC & AGENCY) TRIPS
9828
9596 10,652
Percent of budgeted funds expended (10-1-90 through 6-30-91):
For administrative and ridesharing expenses: 78.2%
For operating costs of public transportation: 62.6%
No shortfall or overpayment of local funds is expected
for the current fiscal year at this time
,
..
/, ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Distributed to Board: 0/ -Lr11....
t\genda item No. q /. (j Y /I (~.Jj
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MR. ROBERT TUCKER, COUNTY EXECUTIVE
CHIEF JOHN F. MILLER
'M a.tw
SEPTEMBER 4, 1991
MOBILE WATCH
I want to inform you about a program that the Albemarle
County Police Department is developing in conjunction with
Adelphia Cable Communications, Centel and Virginia Power to
enlist the assistance of utility vehicle drivers in crime
reporting and emergency communications.
As our community grows and diversifies, reducing crime and
protecting personal safety are increasing challenges that can
best be met by cooperative partnerships between law enforcement
and the private sector. Through the MOBILE WATCH program we plan
to combine the resources of local police and major utilities to
create an extensive network of drivers trained in observing and
reporting suspicious and/or criminal activities and in providing
emergency communications for citizens in need. With MOBILE
WATCH, the nearly 200 utility drivers that circulate daily
through local neighborhoods become additional "eyes and ears"
that will enhance our ability to deter crime and increase
feelings of safety and security among area residents,
particularly those in more remote locations.
Utility drivers will be trained by police and Emergency
Operations Center personnel on a regular basis through classroom
teaching and an instructional video which is being written and
produced locally with funds from the three participating
utilities. Drivers are not required to do anything that would
interfere with their regular job functions and are discouraged
from becoming involved in any incident beyond reporting in
accordance with approved procedures. Participating vehicles will
be identified with a MOBILE WATCH decal which we will publicize
to the community as indicating both crime reporting and safe
emergency communications.
~
Mr. Tucker
Page Two
September 4, 1991
This program originally was developed as a county initiative
with the assistance of one or our department's volunteers, Lee
Catlin. Both Chief Bowen and Chief Sheffield have since
expressed interest in participating so we foresee expanding
MOBILE WATCH into a regional effort when the program gets
underway later this fall.
We are very excited about the MOBILE WATCH program's
potential in helping us to reduce criminal incidents and to
apprehend and prosecute guilty persons. Also, perhaps most
importantly, we welcome the opportunity to provide increased
enforcement presence and visibility in neighborhoods where
citizens may feel isolated and vulnerable to crime. The addition
of almost 200 vehicles and drivers to our public safety team
means better protection and improved access to emergency services
for all county residents.
JFM/lbv
.,
F. R (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
f :,
\ ~,J }'
~~".,~,,,,~
( ~. ./
f . ~..... ".r'
~ ; . t;:harlottej Y /' Humphns
'_i ~ ,1 Jotk /"uetl
-.. iL"">,,
Walter F, Perkins
Whltt;' Hall
Edward H Bain, Jr
Samuel Miller
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Peter T. Wav
Scollsvtll€
September 13, 1991
Ms. Lee Catlin
92 Oak Forest Circle
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Dear Ms. Catlin:
On behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, let me
take this opportunity to express our appreciation for the initia-
tive and effort you provided in developing the MOBILE WATCH Program.
This program will send a clear message to our community that we
have placed a high priority on crime prevention and are willing to
take proactive steps in providing safety and security to all
residents.
The efforts of our volunteers are most important to the Board
of Supervisors and are recognized as an invaluable asset. Your
leadership and motivation have not gone unnoticed and we commend
you for your efforts!
Sincerely,
F. R. Bowie
Chairman
FRB:ec
....
" "'..
,.'
!
~ ,.,.~~.,-"\ \ ;.: -"'-.:
i ''0" ., ~_ ,: ~
: ' : \ : Or"l',lotte Y Humph"s
~ . ,lack ,Jouett
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
September 13, 1991
\ f--'
\,J
~ i1\ter F Perkllls
\...".! While Hall
Edward H Bam, Jr
Samuel Miller
David p, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
Mr. Steve Lee
Adelphia Cable Communications
11 Middlebrook Road
Staunton, VA 24401
Dear Mr. Lee:
On behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, I
wanted to take this opportunity to express our appreciation for the
commitment you and your organization have made to the new MOBILE
WATCH Program. It is this kind of initiative that underscores our
community's resolve to deter crime and increase safety and security
to our residents.
The utility companies that service Albemarle County are making
a tremendous contribution in participating in this program that
should not go unnoticed. Your leadership in making this a success-
ful effort is commendable and much appreciated. Please keep up the
good work in making our county a safer one!
Sincerely,
F. R. Bowie
Chairman
FRB:ec
cc: Mr. Dell Hanley
f
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
September 13, 1991
'''I l:'~
~. t\
Ch~;lotie'Y1-lJmphTls
. ";dC~:";~ot~~'1
~
Walter F: PerklT1s
.
While!',H,,)1
Edward H BalT1, Jr
Samuel Mill~r
F. R (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T Way
Scotlsville
Mr. A. T. Anderson
Assistant Manager/Customer Services
Centel
400 West Rio Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Anderson:
On behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, I
wanted to take this opportunity to express our appreciation for the
commitment you and your organization have made to the new MOBILE
WATCH Program. It is this kind of initiative that underscores our
community's resolve to deter crime and increase safety and security
to our residents.
The utility companies that service Albemarle County are making
a tremendous contribution in participating in this program that
should not go unnoticed. Your leadership in making this a success-
ful effort is commendable and much appreciated. Please keep up the
good work in making our county a safer one!
Sincerely,
F. R. Bowie
Chairman
FRB:ec
cc: Mr. Tom Brown
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
.,...... ".', ", "
j ,., cha~ot'e' Y. Hu'mp~Tls
'\ l;- ", .J~k Jou~tt ';i
,', .
Edward H. Baln, Jr
Samud Miller
, 1: -d"
,;. \V:a1t4r F, Perkins
~i White Hall
F. R (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T Way
SCotl5ville
September 13, 1991
Mr. Phil Sparks
Director of Customer Services
Virginia Power
PO Box 7507
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Sparks:
On behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, I
wanted to take this opportunity to express our appreciation for the
commitment you and your organization have made to the new MOBILE
WATCH Program. It is this kind of initiative that underscores our
community's resolve to deter crime and increase safety and security
to our residents.
The utility companies that service Albemarle County are making
a tremendous contribution in participating in this program that
should not go unnoticed. Your leadership in making this a success-
ful effort is commendable and much appreciated. Please keep up the
good work in making our county a safer one!
Sincerely,
F. R. Bowie
Chairman
FRB:ec
cc: Mr. David Roop
4 .t
l-l-He-r
{
cC/
MOBILE WATCH PARTICIPANTS
Steve Lee (703)886-3419
Adelphia Cable Communications
11 Middlebrook Road
Staunton, VA 24401
Dell Hanley 296-7205
General Manager
Adelphia Cable Communications
324 West Main Street
Charlottesville, VA 22901
AU A. T. Anderson 971-4300 Ce.-
It . Assistant Manager/Customer Services ____7
Centel ~
400 West Rio Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
/t~
Phil Sparks 972-6780
Director of Customer Service
Virginia Power
P. O. Box 7507
Charlottesville, VA 22906
cc
~
~ ~
'{\., .'it " "
( r,.;.;, ,~ .
C(''l ()~~ C.:,~
(',
~~~, \)0-- d-'}..~o ~
/Yl r. "/ ~ f6rovJ..J
-r:fk '} (t"\....~ c /..4.~ \ .'
) il' 1\./ (j ,'A t..{..<.iUj
: '{- \I j{ ~ I' "V'"
, IU ':, " "l-t.. ~,-
/Vtr_ Va.........; J Roof
"{;.Ik ; P)('~~...1Q tt~
~/lV\" f' C&--' (/; {u.. Tt}1 's~
I V:'.V1'_'._} r ..-
Nid1ll/ll/ld, \ 'll~llll" .l. ;_'! ),
Distributed to Board: q -~_-(J L
AH'?nda Item NI). q ,~ 01'/1 ~,~
.
VIRGINIA POWER
August 30, 1991
" ,
. t
To: Local Government Officials:
Pursuant to Paragraph No. 17 of the state corporation Commission's
Order of August 29, 1991, in Case No. PUE910047, "Application of
Virginia Electric and Power Company for a Expedited Increase in
Rates", Virginia Power is providing you a copy of this Order.
Please take notice of its contents.
~~IZ;g ~
~~drick R. Ri~s
Counsel for Virginia Power
Attachment
.'
. CONT'" CENlfihMMONWEAL11IOFVlRGINIA 404;:1,"1
DOCUtAENT STATECORPORAnONCOMMISSIO~ 1 083 0 .
APPLICATION OF
AT RICHMOND, AUGUST 29, 1991
\99\ AUG 2 9 :,~'1 :0: 33
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND
POWER COMPANY
CASE NO. PUE910047
For an expedited increase
in rates
ORDER AUTHORIZING IN'rERDI RATES
AND PRESCRIBING NOTICE AND HEARING
On August 1, 1991, Virginia Electric and Power Company
("Virginia Power" or the "Company") tiled an application,
supporting testimony and exhibits seeking an increase in its
electric rates. The proposed rates are designed to produce
additional annual operating revenue of $183,946,000. The test
year supporting the application is the 12 months ending
December 31, 1990. Virginia Power has requested the proposed
increase go into effect on September 1, 1991, subject to refund
pending a final decision in this case.
On August 20, 1991, Jean Ann Pox filed a motion requesting
the Commission to convert this proceeding to a general rate
investigation and to suspend the Company's proposed rates pending
such investigation. In support of her motion, Ms. Fox stated
that Virginia Power is proposing to increase base rates for
residential service by 10.65' and that a residential rate
increase ot that magnitude in an expedited proceeding undercuts
consumer confidence in utility regulation and would be
inconsistent with House Joint Resolution No. 348 adopted by the
1979 Virginia General Assembly. She also asserted that the
magnitude of the increase represented a substantial change in
circumstances and that Virginia Power's adjustments to update
rate base six months beyond the end of the test year are
inconsistent with the Commission's Rules Governing Utility Rate
Increase Applications and Annual Informational Filings ("Rate
Case Rules"). Finally, she argued that capacity acquisitions and
related expenses require substantial investigation on the part of
the.Commission through a general rate case process.
Virginia Power responded to Ms. Fox's motion on August 21,
1991. In its response, the Company noted that the Rate Case
Rules currently in effect are not based on House Joint Resolution
No. 348 referenced in Ms. Fox's motion. The Company also
restated the circumstances surrounding its 1988 rate case (Case
No. PUE880014) in which the Commission suspended a proposed
expedited rate increase for 150 d~ys. In that case, the Company
filed a proposed expedited increase in rates only six weeks after
a rate reduction was ordered. Commission action was not based on
the size of the increase.
Further, the Company correctly noted that the Commission
gave the Company explicit direction on how to proceed in its next
rate filing relative to adjustments to update rate base.
Aoolication of Virainia Electric and Power Comoanv, Case
No. PUE900023, Final Order (April 22, 1991). In response to
Ms. Fox's final argument, the Company asserted that there is no
requirement which forces capacity purchases to be investigated in
a general rather than expedited rate case and capacity costs have
been litigated in the context of expedited cases. Virginia Power
also stated that suspension for 150 days, in addition to delaying
needed rate relief, would delay the beginning of the rate year by
2
four months and consequently greatly increase the calculated
revenue requirement, "especially the capacity charge component of
that revenue requirement."
The Division of Consumer Counsel, Office of the Attorney
General (the "Consumer Counsel") tiled a motion similar to
Ms. Fox's motion on Auqust 23, 1991. Therein, the Consumer
Counsel asked the Commission to dismiss the application, treat it
as a general rate application and suspend the proposed rates for
150 days from the date of filing or require Virginia Power to
amend its application to exclude any adjustments which do not
conform to the requirements of the Rate Case Rules. The Consumer
Counsel arqued that the application contains numerous violations
of the Rate Case Rules. Specifically, the Consumer Counsel
arqued that the Company's adjustment to update rate base should
not be allowed in the context of an expedited case regardless of
the Commission's direction in Virginia Power's last rate case,
~., Final Order, (April 22, 1991). The Consumer Counsel stated
that those adjustments were not approved in the company's last
aeneral rate case, ADDlication of Virainia Electric and Power
ComDany, 1988 S.C.C. Ann. Rept. 270 (April 7, 1988). The
Consumer Counsel also arqued that purchased capacity expenses
pro formed beyond the end of the proforma year violate the Rate
Case Rules.
Like Ms. Fox, the Consumer Counsel asserted that the
magnitude of the increase represents a substantial change in
circumstances which warrants the relief requested. The Consumer
Counsel asserted that the magnitude of the purchased capacity
3
expenses also constituted a substantial change in circumstances
for purposes of Rule II. The Consumer Counsel concluded by
asserting that the Company's proposed rate desiqn changes violate
the Rate Case Rules.
On August 27, 1991, the Virginia Comaittee for Fair Utility
Rates (the RCommitteeR) filed its response to the motions to
convert or limit issues. The Comaittee supported the motions
filed by Ms. Fox and the Consumer Counsel.
On August 27, 1991, Virginia Power responded to the Consumer
Counsel's motion and the Committee's response. The Company
asserted that any consideration of the Rate Case Rules must be
made in the context of, and consistent with, the Commission's
prior decisions interpreting and ~pplying those rules. The
Company noted that the Commission provided it with direction for
filing adjustments to update rate base in future cases without
limitation to general rate case filings. The Company further
noted that rate year capacity charges have been allowed in every
Virginia Power rate case, general as well as expedited, beginning
with Case No. PUE840071. It further stated that the bulk of the
capacity charges included in the proposed rate increase relate to
the Doswell, Hadson and Commonwealth Atlantic projects, each of
which was reviewed by the Commission in formal proceedings.
Finally, the Company countered that the Consumer Counsel's
argument that the Company's rate desiqn proposals prevent the
case from being handled as an expedited proceeding is without
merit since the Commission, in Case No. PUE900023, directed that
customers should be classified into the four new schedules in the
4
next rate case. ADDlication of Virainia Electric and Power
ComDanv, Ca.. Ho. PUE900023, Final Order (April 22, 1991).
How, baving considered the application, the motions and
related pleadings, and staff's Interi. Report, the Commission
finds that the motions filed by Jean Ann Fox and the Consumer
Counsel should be denied. As we indicated in ADDlication of
Virainia Electric and Power ComDany, 1988 S.C.C. Ann. Rept. 312,
313-314 (December 30, 1988), "[o]ur method of processing rate
increase applications on a prompt basis, which we now call an
expedited proceeding, has been evolving . . . . we have made
reasonable accommodations in specific cases to hear issues
believed important by parties to the case." Further, the parties
should recognize that the depth of the Commission's investigation
and review is the same in an expedited case as it is in a general
proceeding.
In the case before us, it is our determination that the
ratepayer would not be served by suspending the proposed rates
for 150 days or dismissing the case. To the contrary, the
Company represented that suspension for 150 days would result in
a substantially higher calculated revenue requirement due to
increased capacity charges and increased attrition. In its
Interim Report filed on August 27, 1991, Staff also indicated
that "the additional purchased capacity expense would more than
offset the savings associated with the four month delay." staff
Interim Report at p.3.
The Commission finds that there is a reasonable probability
that the requested increase will be justified upon full
5
investigation and hearing. Virginia Power therefore should be
allowed to iaplement its proposed rates on an interim basis
subject to refund with interest. Tbe Commission further finds
that the Company should give notice to the public of its
application; that prior to granting a permanent increase in
rates, the Commission's staff should conduct a full investigation
into the reasonableness of the proposed tariff revisions and
present their findings to the Co..ission: and that a public
hearing should be held to receive relevant evidence.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) That this matter is hereby docketed and assigned Case
No. PUE910047;
(2) That the Motion filed by Jean Ann Fox and the Motion of
the Division of Consumer Counsel, Office of the Attorney General
to Enforce the Commission's Rules for Expedited Rate Increase
Applications are denied:
(3) That an interim increase in rates designed to produce
additional gross annual revenue of $183,946,000 shall be applied
to service rendered on and after September 1, 1991, and that such
interim increase shall remain subject to refund with interest
until such tiae as the Commission determines this case;
(4) That pursuant to Rule 7:1 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure ("SCC Rules.), a Hearing Examiner is
appointed to conduct all further proceedings in this matter;
(5) That a hearing before a Hearing Examiner is scheduled
for January 15, 1992 at 10:00 a... in the Commission's 13th Floor
6
Courtroom located in the Jefferson Building, Bank and Governor
streets, Richaond, Virginia for the purpose of receiving evidence
relevant to Co.pany's application;
(6) That, on or before September 16, 1991, Company shall
make copies of its application, supporting exhibits and prefiled
direct testimony available for public inspection during regular
business hours at all offices where customer bills may be paid;
(7) That Company shall respond to written interrogatories
within 10 days after receipt of the same. Protestants also shall
respond to written interrogatories within 10 days after receipt
of the same. Objections to data requests on any basis must be
filed within five days after receipt of the data requests by the
party to whom the data requests ate directed. Any objection to
data requests not timely raised may be subject to waiver. Except
as so modified, discovery shall be in accordance with Part VI of
the SCC Rules;
(8) That Company file any necessary supplemental direct
testimony on or before October 14, 1991;
(9) That, on or before OCtober 28, 1991, any person
desiring to participate as a protestant, as defined in see
Rule 4:6, shall file with the Clerk of the Commission an original
and twenty (20) copies of a notice of protest as provided in SCC
Rule 5:16(a) and shall serve a copy upon Charles K. Trible,
Esquire, Virginia Electric and Power Company, P.O. Box 26666, One
James River Plaza, Richmond, Virginia 23219 and Evans B.
Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton , Williams, P.O. Box 1535, Riverfront
Plaza, 951 East Byrd street, Richmond, Virginia 23219:
7
(10) That within five days of receipt of any notice of
protest, Coapany shall .erve upon each protestant a copy of all
material now or hereaftar filed with the Comaission;
(11) That any person who expects to submit evidence, cross-
examine witnesses or otherwise participate in the proceeding as a
protestant, pursuant to SCC-Rule 4:6, shall file on or before
December 11, 1991, an original and twenty (20) copies of a
protest with the Clerk of the state Corporation Commission, c/o
Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 2~2l6
and simultaneously serve a copy thereof upon Company and upon any
other protestant. The protest shall set forth (i) a precise
statement of the interest of the protestant in the proceeding;
(ii) a full and clear statement ot the facts which the protestant
is prepared to prove by competent evidence; and (iii) a statement
of this specific relief sought and the legal basis therefor. Any
corporate entity that wishes to submit evidence, cross-examine
witnesses or otherwise participate as a protestant must be
represented by legal counsel in accordance with the requirements
of SCC Rule 4:8;
(12) That, on or before December 11, 1991, each protestant
shall file twenty (20) copies of the prepared testimony and
exhibits protestant intends to present at the public hearing and
serve a copy upon Company and each other protestant:
(13) That, on or before December 18, 1991, the Commission's
staff shall file an original and twenty (20) copies of the
prepared testimony and exhibits staff intends to present at the
8
public hearing and shall serve a copy upon Company and upon each
protestant;
(14) That, on or before January 8, 1992, the Company shall
file with the comaission an original and twenty (20) copies of
all testimony it expects to introduce in rebuttal to all direct
prefiled testimony and exhibits; additional rebuttal evidence may
be presented by the Company without prefiling, provided it is in
response to evidence which was not prefiled but elicited at the
time of the hearing and, provided further, the need for
additional rebuttal evidence is timely addressed by motion during
the hearing and leave to present said evidence is granted by the
Hearing Examiner. The Company shall serve a copy of its prefiled
rebuttal evidence upon all parties of record;
(15) That any person desiring to comment in writing on
Company's application may do so by directing such comments on or
before December 11, 1991, to the Clerk of the Commission, c/o
Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, RiChmond, Virginia 23216.
Such comments must refer to Case No. PUE910047. Any person
desiring to make a statement at the public hearing concerning the
application need only appear in the Commission's 13th Floor
Courtroom at 9:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing and identify
himself or herself to the Bailiff as a public witness;
(16) That, on or before September 30, 1991, Company shall
complete publication of the following notice to be published as
display advertising (not classified) once a week for two
consecutive weeks in newspapers of general circulation in
Company's service territory:
9
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF AN
APPLICATION FOR AN EXPEDITED INCREASE
IN RATES BY VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
CASE NO. POE910047
On August 1, 1991, Virginia Electric and
Power Company (.Virginia Power. or .Co.pany.)
filed an application with the State
Corporation Commission of Virginia to
increase its rates and charges for electric
service to produce additional annual operating
revenue of $183,946,000.
Virginia Power requested the proposed
increase set forth in the schedules of rates
and terms and conditions filed with the
commission to go into effect on September 1,
1991, subject to refund with interest pending
investigation. The Commission granted the
Company's request for such an interim
increase subject to refund.
These interim rates have been designed
by Virginia Power to redover the additional
revenue requested by the Company in this
proceeding according to methods previously
approved by the Commission. CUstomers
receiving service under the Company's
Schedule 5 "Small General Service" and
Schedule 6 "Large General Service" should
take notice that Virginia Power, as part of
its request and in response to the
Commission's Final Order in Case
No. PUE900023, is seeking approval of a plan
to implement four (4) new general service
schedules and to phase-out Schedules 5 and 6
("Plan"). Virginia Power's Plan, if
approved, will require all commercial and
industrial customers to move from Schedule 5
or Schedule 6 to one of the four proposed new
classes of general service during the next
several years, and a substantial number of
such customers may be transferred to one of
the.e new schedules during 1992. Service for
such customers may not be provided under
Schedules 5 or 6 thereafter.
A public hearing on the application is
scheduled before a hearing exaainer for
January 15, 1992, at 10:00 a.m. in the
Commission's 13th Floor Courtroom in the
Jefferson Building, Bank and Governor
Streets, Richmond, Virginia to receive
10
evidence relevant to Virginia Power's
application. Interested persona should be
advised that after considering all evidence,
the Commission may prescribe rates for
electric service which differ fro. those
appearing in Virginia Power'. application.
Small and large co..ercial and industrial
customers should be advised that the
Commission has been asked to review and
consider a Plan filed by Virginia Power to
begin withdrawing' Schedule 5 and 6 arid
Offering service to such custo..rs through
the new general service schedules. If, after
considering all the evidence, the Commission
prescribes that these new general service
rates are to take effect at the conclusion of
this proceeding, small and large commercial
and industrial customers may experience
substantial changes in the terms, conditions,
charges and rates from the interim rates now
in effect.
A copy of Company's application, is
available for public inspection during
regular business hours ~t any company office
where customer bills may be paid and at the
SCC Document Control Center, Floor B-1,
Jefferson Building, Bank and Governor
streets, RiChmond, Virginia.
Any person desiring to comment in
writing on the application may do so by
directing such comments on or before
December 11, 1991, to the Clerk of the
Commission as provided below. Any person
desiring to make a statement at the public
hearing, either for or against the
application, need only appear in the
Commission's Courtroom at 9:30 a.m. on the
day of the hearing and identify himself or
herself to the Bailiff as a public witness.
On or before October 28, 1991, persons
desiring to participate as protestants, as
defined in Rule 4:6 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure ("SeC RUles") and
to present evidence and cross-examine
witnesses, shall file an original and twenty
(20) copies of a notice of protest as
described in SCC Rule 5:16(a), with the Clerk
of the Commission at the address set forth
below and serve a copy on Virginia Power.
Service upon Virginia Power shall be directed
to Charles K. Trible, Esquire, Virginia
11
Electric and Power Company, P.O. Box 26666,
Richaond, virginia 23216 and to Evans B.
Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton , Williaas,
Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd
street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
Any person who expects to sub.i t
evidence, cross-examine witnesses or
otherwise participate in the proceeding as a
protestant, pursuant to SCC Rule 4:6 shall
file on or before-Deceiaber 11, 1991, an
original and twenty (20) copies of a protest
with the Clerk of the state Corporation
Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.O.
Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216 and
simultaneously serve a copy thereof upon
Company and upon any other protestant. The
protest shall set forth (i) a precise
statement of the interest of the protestant
in the proceeding; (ii) a full and clear
statement of the facts which the protestant
is prepared to prove by competent evidence;
and (iii) a statement of the specific relief
sought and the legal basis therefor. Any
corporate entity that w!shes to submit
evidence, cross-examine witnesses or
otherwise participate as a protestant must be
represented by legal counsel in accordance
with the requirements of SCC Rule 4:8.
On or before December 11, 1991, each
protestant shall file twenty (20) copies of
the prepared testimony and exhibits
protestant intends to present at the hearing
and shall serve a copy upon Company and upon
any other protestant.
All written communications to the
commission regarding this case should be
directed to William J. Bridge, Clerk,
Virginia state Corporation Commission,
Docuaent Control Center, P.O. Box 2118,
Ricbaond, Virginia 23216 and should refer to
case Mo. PUE910047.
V1:RGIMIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
(17) That on or before September 30, 1991, Virginia Power
shall serve a copy of this order upon the chairman of the board
of supervisors of each county and upon the mayor or manager of
every city or town (or equivalent officials in counties, cities
12
and towns baving alternate foras of government) in which the
Company offers service. Service shall be aade by first-class
mail to the customary place of business or the residence of the
person served:
(18) That, due to th~ particular proposa~s in rate design
contained in the Application, the Company shall include a bill
insert in its monthly bills during the next available billing
cycle for all current Schedule 5 and Schedule 6 customers. The
bill insert shall (1) provide notice to such customers of the
proposed changes in rate design: (2) advise each customer that a
rate impact analysis of the proposed changes will be provided by
Virginia Power at the request of the customer; and (3) state how
such information or additional information may be obtained from
the Company; and
(19) That, at the commencement of the hearing scheduled
herein the Company provide the Commission proof of notice and service
required by paragraphs (16), (17) and (18) herein.
AN ATTESTED COPY hereof shall be sent by the Clerk of the
Commission to Charles K. Trible, Esquire and Kendrick R. Riggs,
Esquire, Virginia Electric and Power Company, P.O. Box 26666,
Richmond, Virginia 23216: Evans B. Brasfield, Esquire and
Richard D. Gary, Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Riverfront Plaza,
East Tower, 951 East Byrd street, Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074;
Edward L. Petrini, Esquire, Division of Consumer Counsel, Office
of the Attorney General, 101 North 8th Street, Richmond, Virginia
23219: Ms. Jean Ann Fox, 114 Coachman Drive, Yorktown, Virginia
23693: Louis R. Monacell, Esquire, Christian, Barton, Epps,
13
Brent , Chappell, 1200 Mutual Building, Richmond, Virginia 23219-
3095: Jeffrey M. Gleaaon, Eaquire, Southern Environmental Law
Center, 201 Weat Main street, suite 14, Charlottesville, Virginia
22901 and to the co..ission'. Divisions of Public Utility
Accounting, Econo.ic. and Pinance and Energy Requ~ation.
. -
A True Copy J J ~ "1'1 ~ ~ · -r ~"'.'.
Teste: vv~.,.",..
'.. .. Clerk of the .
State COrporation Commission -....
14
'.
~
I
Distributed to Board: !1-er. - (I.!-
Agenda Item No. L11, J,tq f J (5.4)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE 1-
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
aniJ(JJ ~
FROM:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
Community Development
DATE:
September 5, 1991
RE:
Federal Express Development - Monitoring Report -
Consent Agenda
As you may recall, on May 8, 1991 the Board requested that
the existing service road entrance from Rt. 29 to the
Federal Express site be closed on November 1, 1991. This
extended period was intended to allow the developer time to
pursue a revised access design which would allow continued
direct access from U.S. Rt. 29N to the site via the service
road. At the same meeting, the Board requested that staff
provide a monitoring report(s) as to the developer's
progress under the approved concept dated May 8, 1991. As
of this writing, neither VDOT nor the Department of
Engineering nor the Planning staff have received any plans
for alternate access. Staff has received verbal information
from Mr. Wendell Wood and his consulting engineer, Mr. Buddy
Edwards, as to the status of this matter. Negotiations have
been underway between Mr. Wood and the property owner to the
south (the Garden Patch site). Mr. Wood wants to purchase a
portion of the Garden Patch property to allow the northern
entrance to the service road to be moved southward. Less
parking would then be taken from the Federal Express site to
reconfigure this entrance. Mr. Edwards indicates agreement
has been reached with the Garden Patch and it is his
intention to have a plan submitted to us on September 16.
i
Albemarle County Board of Supervisor
Page 2
September 5, 1991
Should the revised plan not be acceptable or submittal of
the plan occur later than indicated by Mr. Edwards, the
November 1 deadline for closing or modifying the entrance
under the May 8 concept is not likely to be met. If such
complications arise, the Board may want staff to contact the
individual leasees of this project as well as other
properties served by this access as to its pending closing .
This action is intended as a courtesy to those who mayor
may not be aware of the scheduled November 1 entrance
closing.
VWC/RSK/jcw
cc: Amelia Patterson
Wendell Wood
, 'I-
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Miss Neher:
Attached find the monthly
construction in Albemarle County.
of Supervisors members. I will
meeting if they so desire.
DSR/smk
attachment
cc: R. W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
p, 0, BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902
D, S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDEI':H ENGINEER
September 3, 1991
'.' "
Current Projects
Construction Schedule
update on highway improvement projects currently under
Please see that this information is forwarded to the Board
be prepared to discuss this matter with them at the next
Yours truly,
~. ~ ~s'<,J_r~\.v'
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
. .
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
SEPTEMBER 1, 1991
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------.------------.
jROUTE I
INO. I
LOCrlTION
STATUS
EST.COMP i
DATE
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
1660
I
i
1 BRIDGE OVER S. FORK RIVANNA RIVER
I
CONSTRUCTION 65% COMPLETE
NOV 91
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+-------------
I
\743
I
I
I INT. ROUTE 606 NEAR AIRPORT
I
CONSTRUCTION 20% COMPLETE
NOV 91
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+-------------
I
1250
I
I
I ST. CLAIR AVE. TO RTE. 64
I
CONSTRUCTION 4% COMPLETE
SEP 93
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------~
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------~
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------~------------~
REVISED DATE
** NEW PROJECT
*
~-' (.
\"Ii dr'o' t ,4 ~d '['" 1:'0" rd' vI -
'ii ',to I . ,t, ',J \:i\,lU .
A~ef1d:;tem No, 91. ()~Ll{90!ll
r,
i . ~- ... ~ .II: ,~, r;
"
to
I
'. " :~, -, t'" \
STATEMENTS OF EXPENSES
'-
r: '
To:
For:
State Compensation Board
Month of 6U1/AfJ f/ / q 'II
DEPARTMENT:
County Share State Share Total
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE: ~7/tl, 7/ .:<7/P? ?/ 5f/~s:;/~
SHERIFF: 5t1f tiP S~~~
COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY: /c;:? /t1. 1/e2- /p(/v::4
REGIONAL JAIL: /3&:3: ?c? 8~d' tft
Note: Expenses listed above are only those office expenses in
which the State Compensation Board has agreed to participate, and
are not the total office expenses of these departments.
l
L, d,-C1_-:?/;_:(:'1l
-,..~..- --~.. .,......,..._.v,_._,_,~.".....
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
401 MciNTIRE ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901-4596
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
Board of Supervisors
FROM:
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk,
CMcfl-
.-/
DATE: September 6, 1991
SUBJECT: Reading List for September 11 1991
April 3, 1991 - Page 15 (#7) - Page 19 (#9) - Mr. Way I.' i
Page 19 (#9) - Page 32 (#10) - Mr. Bowie \i.t~.c1..,,)
Page 32 (#10) - End - Mr. Perkins (lc.<:.c.<,\
LEN:ec
~
j)
,
, - .
Non-Arbitrage Program (the "Proceeds Agreement"), ~a) an exeCULeu
copy of the Use of Proceeds Certificate in the form attached
hereto as Appendix C, (e) a transcript of the other customary
documents not listed above, and (f) the proceeds of VPSA's bonds.
4.
This Bond Sale Agreement shall take effect on April 5, 1991.
Mr. Bowie said this is the last bond issue that he is willing to support
without going to a general bond referendum.
Agenda Item No. 12. Appropriation Request: Agnor-Hurt Elementary
School.
L
Mr. Jones said the Agnor-Hurt Elementary School is estimated to cost
$6,816,000 which does not include Berkmar Drive improvements. Funding for
this school is included in the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) bond
issue along with funding for Berkmar Drive ($950,000) and Recreational Faci-
lities ($35,000). The School Board received favorable bids which were
approximately $1.50 per square foot less than the recently completed Cale
Elementary School. This low bid allows the project to absorb the original
underestimate on land purchase costs and still be within the amount approved
in the Capital Improvement Program budget. Since there has already been an
appropriation in the amount of $1,735,000 made for this project, the Board is
requested to approve an additional $5,081,000. The additional amount needed
for the Berkmar Drive improvements will be requested after acquisition of
right-of-way and design approval is complete, so more accurate cost figures
are available.
Motion was offered by Mrs. Humphris, seconded by Mr. Way, to adopt the
following resolution approving an appropriation in the amount of $5,081,000 to
fund construction of the Agnor-Hurt Elementary School:
FISCAL YEAR: 90/91
FUND: CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR AGNOR-HURT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CONSTRUCTION.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION
1900060215312300 PROF. SERVICES-ARCH. & ENG.
1900060215312365 CIP COORDINATOR
1900060215580000 MISC EXPENSES
1900060215800200 FURNITURE & FIXTURES
1900060215800605 CONSTRUCTION
1900060215800670 UTILITIES
1900060215800750 LAND ACQUISITION
1900060215999999 CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
AMOUNT
$ 322,884.00
40,352.00
7,500.00
220,000.00
3,086,000.00
40,000.00
1,153,394.00
210,870.00
$5,081,000.00
I
,
REVENUE
2900041000410500 LOAN PROCEEDS
TOTAL
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
$5,081,000.00
$5,081,000.00
Roll was called and the foregoing motion carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Bain, Bowerman, Bowie, Mrs. Humphris, Mr. Perkins and Mr. Way.
None.
Agenda Item No. 13. Approval of Governor's Early Retirement Program.
M... 'P....':mr1pnn11...o,p... <::::1; n ~()vprnor Wi Ider' s one-time early retirement
9/~?'/~~
: ", ~J
McGUlREWooOS
BATTLE & BooT H E
,. --;;ij_;; ~J /.1 fl"\.
'fumspotomac Plaza
1199 North Fairfax Street
Alexandria. VA 22314
3950 Chain Bridge Road
Fairfax, VA 22030
World 'JI'ade Center
Norfdlk. VA 23510
Court Square Building
P.O. Box 1288
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
;\~
.~. i ...
oM J~Jhes Center
Ril)lt/llOPfi, VA 23219
"~/ : i +t--
.J ','~~,~~7.~rk Street
, .'" WUUamsDurg. VA 23185
~- - -,.. '.' -, j.".'
8280 Greensboro Drive
Mclean, VA 22102
(804) 977-2500
Fax: (804) 980-2222
, , i .~ .': .
The Army and Navy Club Building
1627 Eye Street, NW.
Washington. DC 20006
September 10, 1991
BY HAND DELIVERY
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Re: Centel Cellular SP-90-102
Gentlemen:
On behalf of the applicant, Centel Cellular of
Charlottesville, we respectfully request the above application be
withdrawn. It is possible this application will be resubmitted in
the future, but the applicant's plans are indefinite at this time.
Thank you.
M]~U~
Fred S. Landess
FSL:sk
cc: Mr. will Ferrence
Albemarle County Planning Department
Mark D. Williamson, Esquire
U:\2541\lTR\BOARD
McGuI REWOODS
BATTLE&BooTHE
f/!f,'Cj/
91.0'//7.91
~ ..
Court Square Building
P.o. Box 1288
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
,l ( lr
'\
,'.w~M~ hide Center
NefiQ\k.;-,vA 23510
,~.:.._-'~
O~ '#e5 Center
, Richmond; VA 23219
~11 ~~
137 YOrl- Street
WilliamsbUrg, VA 23185
. --L-
The Army and:Navy Club Building
1627 Eye Street, N.W.
\\\ishington, DC 20006
, "
\ '
Transpotomac Plaza
1199 North Fairfax Street
Alexandria. VA 22314
3950 Chain Bridge Road
Fairfax, VA 22030
I ,:
8280 Greensboro Drive
Mclean, VA 22102
(804) 977-2500
Fax: (804) 980-2222
August 14, 1991
Mrs. Neher
Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Re: Centel Cellular
Dear Mrs. Neher:
Confirming our telephone conversation, Centel Cellular
respectfully requests the hearing on its application for a Special
Use Permit for relocation of the communications tower be deferred
until the September 11 meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Thank
you for your help, and if anything further is needed, please let
us know.
Very truly yours,
~~2.~
Fred S. Landess
FSL/elo
cc: Mark Williamson, Esquire
will Ferrence
Patty Meggs
BAFSL258.LTR
'.
l "
'....,..--,
.--., ,."
[
n
{ \
~ ;
"
.. ,..."
I ~,
,
. 1[: :::,.\:~5-:,:::;-U'G'-;_1:~ \,L,l
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road '
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
U C, (t,H t.
~ ".
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM:
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Dire~tor of Planning and
Community DevelopmentvvU~ \~~
DATE:
August 16, 1991
RE:
SP-90-102 Centel Cellular
In response to your request regarding the status of the
above, we have spoken with a Centel representative who
provide information to Bill Fritz of my staff (see attached
memo). This is the extent of what we have been able to find
out.
VWC/jcw
"
'"
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and
Community Development
William D. Fritz, Senior Planner ~Pf
August 16, 1991
SP-90-102 Centel Cellular
On August 15, I had the opportunity to talk with Patty Meggs
who is with Centel, regarding the proposed tower site in
Crozet. She informed me that the delay in submitting
information regarding the request is due to Centel looking
at its options in the area and the time required to gather
the information requested by the Board of Supervisors. She
stated Centel will have the information requested before the
item is scheduled to be heard by the Board of Supervisors
again.
WDF/mem
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development ..'
401 McIntire Road ,. ,.. ( \: ;
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 ',\ JUl 22 1991 ; !
(804) 296-5823 L~;~T~;5T~.;TrTJT;:::: '~/
~.') t, F~ 1) C) F ~::.!J P F. E \.' : '. (, ~,..:..
July 18, 1991
Centel Cellular Company
ATTN: Patty Meggs
8725 Higgins Road
Chicago, ILL 60631
RE: SP-90-102 Centel Gellular Company
, '
Dear Ms. Meggs:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on Jul~ 10,
1991, at the request of the applicant, deferred the above-noted request.
Therefore, this item has been rescheduled for review by the Board of
Supervisors at their August 14, 1991 meeting. The Board reiterated that
the issue to be addressed is the height of the towers and if federal
regulations prohibit more than one company using a tower. The Board is
particularly interested in the necessity of the proposed location and
its relationship to the proposed service area as well as the general
service provisions County-wide. The Board also suggested that any new
or additional information be presented to the Board by August 7 so that
if additional information is needed, the applicant can be so notified
prior to August 14.
YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT FOR THIS MEETING.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted
action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
. .
J
unity Development
V. Wayne
Director
VWC/jcw
cc:
AVR Land Corporat~n
Lettie E. Neher /
Fred Landes s
, ~.
" Cenf~f Cellular Com~any
nistributed to Board: 7 . ~ 1/' .
Agenda !tern No. 91. d'/ / l 1/
.'
O'Hare Plaza
8725 Higgins Road
Chicago, IL 60631
Telephone 312 3992644
/
CENTEL
CELLULAR
pllWq)
JUN 26 1991
PLANN\NG Dl'/iS\ON
June 21, 1991
Mr. Ronald S. Keeler
Chief, Planning Division
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596
Dear Mr. Keeler:
.... . .
with regard to Albemarle County's concerns pertaining to Centel's
request for a Conditional Use Permit, it is apparent that there
are two distinct issues at hand. The first issue concerns the
nature of the cellular industry and requirements for quality
service. The second issue concerns the specifics of Centel's need
for a tower site in Northwest Albemarle County; specifically, the
Crozet area.
In answering the question of the cellular industry's nature and
requirements, I would refer you to the letter and attachments
provided during our June 11th conversation. This package provides
a general outline of the concepts of cellular telephone
communication. I have attached a copy of that letter and a list
of the attachments that were furnished. usin9 this package as a
basis for discussion, Centel Cellular is commltted to working with
the County of Albemarle in clearing up any 9uestions or concerns
related to the placement of cellular communlcation towers.
It has been determined that in order to address the issue of tower
location requirements in Albemarle County, further exploration by
Centel is necessary. Centel wishes to ensure that all site
possibilities are researched in an effort to fulfill Centel's
needs and best serve Albemarle County's desire for limited tower
proliferation. Therefore, Centel requests this decision be
deferred until August.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact
me at (312)399-4753.
Respectfully,
'1-V~
will Ferrence
Engineer VA/TN
WF/kbs
Attachments
cc: Fred Landess
Ann Carruthers
Lester Buczek
--=-~, "Memorandum
Oarl. Jun. 11, 1991
CEN'1a
;J county of Albemarl. ,I'"
DepartJnent of PlanninlJ and CormI.1nity De~l~t
.',:m Centel Cellular O::crpany
Suo/,el; lSSUM Relating to Cellular Tower Siting
C.nte1 c.l1ular Ccmpany has bMn authorized by the rederal Comnuni~tiona.
Comniseion (UFCC") to ~ide ~llular service to the Charlottesvill.
Metropolitan service Area ("MSA"). (see Attach. I) The Charlottesville
MSA, !MOO up ot AlbGmerle, rluvann&, and Greene Countiu, is one of 306
such l!!Iervice areas in the unit~ Stat.s. In 1980, the FCC t:'eCOO8i~red
its one-syl!lt~ per market (MSA) strategy and studied the possibility of
introduc:inq ~tition. Balancing the benefits Oe econani.e of scale
~ain!lt the ~efiU of canpetition, tw licenatc5 carri.re per service area
was the s.lected plan. (see Attaoh. II, ch.l, *6) Each COO'('l&ny i. to
deaign it.l own system and divide the market into geographic areas, or cella.
This plan divides a ltlQtropolitan area into a m.mtJer of coveraqe areas
or "cells" (Set Attach. II, eh. 1, .5) with each bein9 u.iqned a portion
of the available radio chann4ala. The chann.ls \lB4iMS in one cell are again
usable in !Ipatially separated cells in the same MM.
The sUbscriber unit (JOObil. or portable telephone) ccmnunicatu
with a distributed array of cell-sit. lan<5 stations. The cell-sit. land
stationa are controlled by the cellular system netllOrk control and switChing
equipntmt the provic5ea connection the the worl6-Yide telecarm.micationa
network. A call bet....-n the land n.twork, or another mobile 1.1Hr, aM a
e\lbecrio.t:' unit is rout~ to the cell site that but eervee the location of
the subaet"iber unit. A c:all in proc;"SB can ~Md indefinitely a.a the
6~iber unit II'OVU fran cell to cell throughout the M5A as it is reasaigned
to an available channel within a new cell.
The choice of location for a ~llular tower site is based on various
factors U t'1!latedto maxinun ~llular Hrvi~ as well u FCC (SM Attach. IV~
and FAA regulationa. (See Attach. V 'VI) '!be primary factors are th.
physical aspeeta of a eite~ auc:h as qround elavation, height of tower,
surroundir19 terrain and location relative to populaticn e.ntera, and ~in
roads and thorouqhfe.res. The overall height (gt'OUl'1d elevation plue tC""'8r
height) of a site relative to ita ~ng ~or the tnllin area to be
covered, is a Uy factor of cell lIize or "footprint-. (See Attach. III, pg. 2)
Additionally, the idtAl are for a site is typioally within 5-7 mile. of
the locaticn of ~8:i.red maxinlJIn signal strenqth. Ultimately, tM location
of the cell determines the arrcunt of ra<3io frequency penetration into
the desired service area. The greater the penettation, ana the IOOre avail~lJ!
path.! to the ~iber unit, the better the ~ity of service provided.
.~.
Q:N"~ULAR
,
In alscussino the F~ and FCC factor of aite choice, a couple of items
are key. The FCC specifies that the MSA boundary of a market limits the
location of sites and the area that can be covered. If a tlite i. too close
to this boundary, a hiOhly directional antenna or a 10tWQr power might be
neceessary to limit any exten8ion outside of the MSA. Both of these remediee
reduce a cells ability to provide coverage to the desired area.
It ehould be noted that in a competitive cellular atmosphere, additional
cell site requirements vary among the two carriers in a market. Thie ie
due to diff&rent neeCls baeed on two main fa.ctors: "footprint" or geooraphic
coverage r~ir~ts and limited frequency capacity. In the initial
"grow-out" of a cellular market, geographiea1 COv$r:age deficiencies must
be handled with the largest allowable and feasible coverage area possible.
In fact, the FCC requires that the Cellular Geographic Strviee Area (UCGSA") ,
or area of intended coverage, ~ at loast 75\ of the MSA. 'n'le second factor,
limiteCI ra~io frequency .spectrum, becanes critical once a carrier has
established a subscriber baae that can no longer be supported by the number
of channels allocated a particular cell. 'Ihe solution tor providin<J
higher capacity in a given area is to use the allocated frequencies repeatedly.
If the transmit: site antenna hoiOht is lowered and the transmitter output
power redtJCGd, the madIrlJrn 1..U5able distance, or RF coverage Ar", of the sit.
is reduced. (See Attach. II, chi 3, 3.1) Accordingly, the m.mber of such
cells needed to cover the same arM ie increased, but they require smaller
to'Were. The cellular concept is that eventually large nl.1D'bera Qf aub5eribera
in 111rge areas can be served with a gri" of "utility-type" towers with
relatively small, but effective, service areas.
....
Cl!NIm.
ClU.LULAR
AIl'1'ACHMJ!:tIn'S
I. FCC Authorization tot:' Cellular Radio Telecamtmieations Service
in Charlottesville MSA
II:.:: Motorola Inc. Radio Frequency Planning Guide
III. Guide to FCC Application Process
IV. Part 22 of FCC Regulations Governing Cellular OperatiONl
V. FAA Advieory Circular 70/746Q..IG de&cribinq standards for marking
and lighting of obstructions aa i~ntifi~ by Federal Aviation
Regulations Part 7~.
VI. Part 77 of Federal Aviation Regulations
VII. ANSI/EIA-222-D Structural standard8 for St..l Antenna Tc1tlers and
Antenna Supporting Structure.
~'"
4>'<-~
-,",
DistrIbuted to Board: it> -7-9 j .
Agenda Item No, ~~LJ:._9 I
; nr (}T
.., '1 ~,~ +;,~~~'~;~"'~~
" , r, ,,, ,". " . " ",li
,'"i ~,,:...;:.... ';;') '-~ ~ L ~_~'\
;- ---.",:'~
. ~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
C hC\rlottcsville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
)l ....,
" ... ,/
I ;
L: ' ~
,I; ,';,.-.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM:
Ronald S. Keeler, Chief of Planning
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and /w /,~,
Community Development L/{ L/
DATE:
June 5, 1991
RE:
Cellular Telephones - Federal Communication
Commission (FCC)
The following is provided as information regarding the issue
of cellular tower locations that will be discussed by the
Board of Supervisors on June 12, 1991. FCC regulations
governing the cellular telephone mode of communication are
in 47CFR22 of the Federal Register. Some uncertainty exists
as to applicability or meaning of certain requirements at
the FCC.
DUOPOLY
FCC requirements provide for issuance of two licenses within
a rural service area (RSA) or metropolitan service area
(MSA; Albemarle is in an MSA). The purpose of double
licensure is to encourage competition and avoid
monopoly/collusion. In fact, FCC requirements prohibit
shared use of "transmitting equipment." FCC staff was
unable to determine whether or not a broadcast tower would
be considered "transmitting equipment" and therefore shared
tower usage between Cellular A and Cellular B would be
forbidden. Opinion was stated that Cellular A and Cellular
B could co-locate on a "neutral" tower. (There are no
technical constraints to shared tower usage).
~
lit
; ~
'I
.. ' '
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Page 2
June 5, 1991
ROAMING
"Home roaming" is one carrier accessing another carrier
within the same service area and is permitted, but not
required, by the FCC. Roaming is required from one service
area to another. Therefore, Cellular A may deny access to
Cellular B and vice versa within a service area, but both
must allow access to any carrier from another service area.
EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Under development are TCN and TCS personal communication
systems which were described as advanced cellular systems.
Licensure regulations have not been developed. Also,
digital systems under development would greatly increase
available frequencies due to reduced band width compared to
current analog broadcasts over a relatively broad band. The
future implications (tower requirements, location, etc.) of
these systems locally are unknown.
It is staff's understanding that a legal representative from
Centel will attend next week's Board of Supervisors meeting
to discuss this matter in more detail.
VWC/jcw
cc: George St. John
':
.;; ,.-....
'~'".....,\,
,Ii, -
I ,.'
\'" -...;
\'~f/
~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney'
416 Park Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Telephone 296-7138
JAMES M BOWLING, IV
DEPun ("DUNn ATTORNEY
May 21, 1991
GEORGE R 5T JOH1\
COUNTY ATTllR!'.F\
Fred S. Landess, Esquire
McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe
Court Square Building
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
rL--: our 0 Ac.. pz.
~\-~78
Dear Fred:
The Board of Supervisors has now rescinded its requirement
that we seek advice from persons other than representatives of
applicants, with respect to cellular telephone towers.
Therefore, I recommend that you bring someone to the
Supervisors day meeting on June 12, 1991, prepared to make a
prEO!P$D~t:atibnofafT 01' the aspects of such towers which would be
relevant to the Board's decision on both the pending application,
and the precedent which would be set by granting this
application.
Specifically, I think this person should be prepared to
discuss the function of cellular telephones, how they answer a
public need, and more important than anything else, present a
means whereby all of the companies permitted to operate within a
given area by the Federal Communications Commission, can use the
same tower to cover that area.
My understanding is that these companies are given a
"duopoly" by the FCC in a given area and that they do not have
the power of eminent domain. I do not know whether they receive
a Certificate of Public Necessity from the State Corporation
Commission, but at any rate, unless your representative can
provide some assurance that towers can be used jointly by the
companies in the duopoly, rather than having the towers
proliferate allover the County in competition with one another,
then I believe the Board would be justified in denying any and
all of these applications.
In other words, I believe the burden is on the applicants,
rather than on the County, to come up with a solution to the
proliferation problem, and if they do not carry this burden, then
the County is justified in denying the applications.
..
Fred S. Landess, Esquire
Page 2
May 21, 1991
Beyond this, I am a little wary of asking specific questions
to be addressed at the meeting, because I do not know enough
myself, even to ask the right questions. The speaker should,
however, be knowledgeable enough and prepared to answer all
questions which may be asked by staff or Board members.
Sincerely yours,
t~
George R. St. John
County Attorney
GRStJ/tlh
cc: y"Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg
,.
Distributed to Board: ~//-7)/
Agenda Item No.::?/ t?,y/ 7,p
,. C
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296 -5823
April 4, 1991
Centel Cellular Company
ATTN: Patty Meggs
8725 Higgins Road
Chicago, ILL 60631
RE: SP-90-102 Centel Cellular Company
Dear Ms. Meggs:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
April 2, 1991, by a vote of 4-1, recommended approval of the
above-noted request to the Board of Supervisors. Please
note that this approval is subject to the following
conditions:
1. Tower height shall not exceed 300 feet;
2. No lighting except for that required by a federal
agency;
3. Department of Engineering approval of tower design to
ensure that in the event of structural failure that the
tower falls within the leased area;
4. Tower is to be designed to accommodate additional
users;
5. Staff approval of additional (future) antennae
installation. No administrative approval shall
constitute or imply support for, or approval of, the
location of additional towers, antennae, etc., even
though they may be part of the same network or system
as any antennae administratively approved under this
petition;
6. Staff approval of subdivision plat as shown on
Attachment C.
Centel Cellular Company
Page 2
April 4, 1991
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors will review this petition and receive public
comment at their meeting on April 17. 1991. Any new or
additional information regarding your application must be
submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least
seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT FOR THIS MEETING.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
v:L 12 ~2
william D. Fritz
Senior Planner
WDF/jcw
cc: Lettie E. Neher
. Amelia Patterson
Richard Moring
AVR Land Corporation
.'
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
APRIL 2, 1991
APRIL 17, 1991
SP-90-102 CENTEL CELLULAR COMPANY
Petition: The Centel Cellular Company petitions the Board
of Supervisors to issue a special use permit to construct a
tower and equipment shelter for cellular telephone
transmission and reception [27.2.2(8)] on part of a 36 acre
parcel zoned LI, Light Industry. Property, described as Tax
Map 56, Parcel 94, is located on the south side of Route 240
and the C&O Railway tracks behind Acme Visible Records, Inc.
in the White Hall Magisterial District.
Character of the Area: The site is developed with Acme
Visible Records. The property to the west is ConAgra.
Properties to the south are zoned R-1, Residential.
Properties to the east are zoned RA, Rural Areas. The site
of the proposed tower is to be located in a wooded portion
of the site near the woodline (Attachment C).
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to locate
a 300' guyed cellular communications tower as shown on
Attachment D. The tower will be designed to allow
additional usage. This project is designed to improve
cellular telephone coverage within the Centel service area.
The system will operate on the FCC assigned frequencies in
the 825 mhz to 890 mhz band with a maximum operating power
of 100 watts effective radiated power.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with Section
31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval
subject to conditions.
PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY:
October 24, 1973 - Board of Supervisors denied request to
rezone 36 acres from M-1, Manufacturing to A-1, Agricultural
(ZMA-283).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: This site is recommended for Industrial
Service in the Community of Crozet. A stated objective of
the Comprehensive Plan is "maintain cooperative planning
efforts between the County and other non-public utilities
which provide essential services, such as telephone,
electric, and natural gas utilities, to ensure the adequate
provision of these services to support existing and
1
.'
anticipated development in the County. Private utilities
provide essential services to the county. The most
important of these are electric, telephone, and natural gas
services" p. 153.
The proposed tower would improve cellular telephone service
in the Crozet area. Staff has reviewed the applicant's
justification for this use and is of the opinion that
cellular telephones provide essential services to the
County.
A stated standard is corridors should be shared by
utilities, when possible (p. 88). While this tower does not
represent a corridor, the general intent of this statement
is to consolidate locations required to provide public
utility services. This tower would provide for additional
users but is not clustered with other existing towers. In
review of this request the Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisors should consider if this tower is intended to be
the core of a new tower cluster or "tower farm".
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
New modes of radiowave communications, combined with the
physiography of Albemarle County have resulted in numerous
requests for transmission/reception tower locations. In
response, the County has attempted to confine broadcast
.towers to clusters or "tower farms". In effort to reduce
the total number of new towers, the County has recently
encouraged tower design to accommodate additional (future)
users. Centel Cellular has responded to this general
guideline and is designing the tower for additional usage.
The applicant has attempted to locate on the existing WCYK
AM tower in Crozet and the WCYK FM tower on Little Yellow
Mountain. Neither of these towers is available for use by
Centel due either to interference problems associated with
the AM tower or the distance of the FM tower from the
service area (Attachment E).
The proposed tower location is on industrial land. The
nearest dwelling to the tower is approximately 1,200 feet
distant. Although likely visible from residences in the
area, this use should not be a detriment to adjacent
properties. Discussion with the airport authority indicates
that the tower will likely be lighted, most likely with a
constant red light. Final aeronautical studies have not
been prepared, however, this tower is not anticipated to
interfere with airport operations.
2
In determining if this use will change the character of the
district, staff has consiuered the following:
1. The tower will be 300 feet in height and will likely be
lighted. The tower will be visible from surrounding
areas.
2. Adjacent properties are zoned Industrial and
Residential.
3. The surrounding properties are recommended for
Industrial Service in the Land Use Plan for Crozet.
4. The base of the tower and equipment shelter will not be
visible from adjacent properties or the public road due
to existing development and vegetation.
5. The nearest dwelling is located approximately 1,200
feet distant.
Staff opinion is that a tower would not change the character
of an industrial district. The tower would be visible from
non-industrial areas. However, it is staff's opinion that
the tower will not change the character of those areas as it
will have only limited impact due to a minimum of 1,200 feet
distance.
The applicant has submitted a justification for cellular
phone service:
"Cellular telephones have greatly increased their usage
and are important for commercial activity and often
public safety in emergency situations, having proven
themselves as the key form of communications in
emergencies, the most recent example being Hurricane
Hugo."
Staff opinion is that this request is in harmony with the
public health, safety and welfare as it provides for
additional telephone service.
The County has received numerous requests for
transmission/reception tower location. The County has
attempted to confine broadcast towers to clusters or "tower
farms". This request represents a stand-alone tower. Staff
notes that the tower will be designed to accommodate other
users. The applicant has stated that attempts made were to
locate on existing towers but was unable to do so. The
Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors must address
the policy issue of permitting stand-alone towers even
though designed for multiple users.
3
.'
Staff offers the following comments which are favorable to
this request:
1. Approval of this request would improve cellular
telephone service in a portion of the County.
provision ot adequate utilities is supported by the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The applicant is designing the tower to accommodate a
minimum of two additional 10 foot standard antennae for
use by others.
3. The nearest dwelling is 1,200 feet distant.
4. The tower is to be located in an industrial district.
Staff offers the following comment which is unfavorable to
this request:
1. The height of the tower, 300 feet, and the lighting
will make this tower visible from surrounding areas.
2. Tower is not located in a cluster with other towers.
As previously stated, the applicant attempted to locate on
existing towers which would be consistent with past policy,
but was unable to do so. The proposed location is such that
it minimizes, but does not eliminate impact of the tower.
Staff opinion is that the favorable aspects of this request
outweigh the unfavorable aspects and that this request is
consistent with Section 31.2.4.1 of the ordinance.
Therefore, staff recommends approval subject to the
following conditions:
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Tower height shall not exceed 300 feet;
2. No lighting except for that required by a federal
agency;
3. Department of Engineering approval of tower design to
ensure that in the event of structural failure that the
tower falls within the leased area;
4. Tower is to be designed to accommodate additional
users;
4
. '
5. Staff approval of additional (future) antennae
ins~~llation. No administrative approval shall
constitute or imply support for, or approval of, the
location of additional towers, antennae, etc., even
though they may be part of the same network or system
as any antennae administratively approved under this
petition.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Permit Application Plan
D - Tower Design
E - Letter from the Applicant
5
~,
llllU
GIBSOr.
'itllLlI j
IATTACHMENT AI w
--
~
:, c~
/"
[7!~LJ\' ~2~
'-~ 1;- '(' "
\1' .
q~J\'. . .fill
"/
-@
\
..
'~ "
~LA T
\, ~,
,~
J
V
,)J
;~ .'
..,'
i
I ,-
/' j
I:,I~
~624 '\\\ Browns
l~ '''' rnve
o IS, ,Q'"
07ro
.~ ,0
\~
/
I .--.:...1,
"-., ; ~
C/7"
-.J
~
o
i::
'f
'-
:=
~
0,7 ~
17~5r .....~,O~ ["
, ' 8101
" , .. FOX MuUNT AIN
. "H Z1;
o~s,~ ...
~\S
Q,t~\ ...
r: .1__1 ~ ;
/
"'
I
""
u
<:
""
....
.~
[iliJ
1>/
G'~O
:<\IJ:
01>
'\
\.
:<-1
0)'
'<,;
~)
o
<:,
,
\."
\0
."
'f 0 671
~ \ :J,t\
\, ~
\.V
[[illY,,, " / -'
\...
f
, Ic"; ,(Ii '
~.~ :6/t,",0
_..___-~, I
~" ,'.' ---)~....
't
~
:,>.
~1-
\
/)
/
\ \
Jiml t-o-)\
~,~ -----\:~-
\,,~r
~
MOUNT AIN
1:.\..'oO\f'J
-0---
e:.V"V
~'i>-(,
"~
':t
SP-90-102
CENTEL CELLULAR
-
.
.'
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
IATTACHMENT 81
40
'"
11 C
-
'~\.
SP-90-102
CENTEL CELLULAR
Z5
-
v ^-./
-
.
ICALE IN ftET
- -
.-
WHITE HALL OISTR leT
SECTION
56
'.
-'
.
IATTACHMENT cl
A.V. R. LAND
'\ \, m" I
\ lJ!!)
CORP. 1 ( -T-, )
___ ____'_____ ,_Il ~JT ,L__ -
...J'
-,-.~ "-,--~!,,"
--;;::::.-;:.~ ::~;..; ~~:~ ~
&
,
! j
\
I
'/
,,'// c-
,/ I .
I
\.- ---" //
(-
,',,'~
-/
ROUDABUSH GALE & ASSOC.,INC
A Professional Corporation
SURVEYORS ENGINEERS
Charlottesville, Virginia
II
F IL./:. 7"&,1
----._--~.~~
<-.. . ---.-----...---.....
. .
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN) - -_..-- ..- ~-. \ -~:::::.::::
FOR PARCEL. " \ _ --
BEING A PORTION OF T.M. \;0 PARCEL 94 ';0 ______ . b
WHITE HALL DISTRICT ~ 'Z.:;.- _.~ .- "1
'ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~ ~O~~ -? \\ ~ ~~
, SCALE:1-"'200' ~ ~ . ~
, DATE:JAN. ~011991 Y -::::::::. _ _ IATTACHMENT Cl
o ,I ~'" '-"l\J/ / ~ 'rn' .
,.- ......-'~, . \',' \i- /~~~ j \\ \\" I
~ t--"--,, --- ~ \\ '
664 51 . ' ,u -:::::- I -:::?" ; I
:.- '-:::?" .: .
--.-\ (~) h~'; .\ '.\; ')
, 'J --.....I""~ I - -':::i \. I I
"- - j! C:-j:--- =='
==!~~t~~~_;~:. ,~.:'~R.LAN~.~~._.~=~ ~jT h.- -
&
) ,
, :
\
! /'.
,'/ n
./ I .
I
,...--. //
~
'.-
/
ROUDABUSH GALE & ASSOC.,INC
A Professional. Corporation
SURVEYORS ENGINEERS
Charlottesville, Virginia
F/l..I:. 7"(;1
II
-
1m i
'JI
a
OJ
ell
UJ
..J
j'l;fio::'
r~j~
~ ~!
- I _ I-
= ~!~\~:~
~,_, 211~: ~ll~~'
~ ~ PI (1) {lJi
I '
.,
1 ~
./'{"--."
~~J~
''-.,,,,,/". I < I
I i
i i
Ul i
Z i
:3 I
~ 1
\
..." - .
~ (\!
.. ..
@
-s ~TTACHMENT ~
- ) o ~ ~
.. ~ 0 l
\II ~ ~ t ;z -
~ J "' .:i~ 0
.- ] !II o ) t!
4 0 l)
.. II ~ ~ 'J t
. VI ) ~
OIl ~
< 0 ~ aliI III
u VI oJ )
$ ~ ~
) <:>
" e' _ "' <(
UI
.! I:J <! 0 J J
;0- ~ ,) 0 IJ
'! ~ 'I ~ -- J.
" - ~ o N uJ
~ r If ~ I-==- '7
J [ )J III
(j ( ~ UJ-: f- a J
I- J " ,r " ]
II ~ 0 )
1. W
" 'J .. ) o "
" ~ " VI ~ t ~
" ~ " t .g 0
~ .;; ) ~ g 4: ~ .3 ~N
v " '" 'I r
v . <t ... "
f ,.j 111 .;
.;
<Drn " rn
,"- "-
"'~ me
"'''' .. "
i--
l!J
~::>
w~~
~~~
llJ u ti
H~W
>g:~
"'0
u
-, ,-.-,'-.-- -~ '" - ';: 1:1
I 1 ~~I il N
I <oJ .0 'I.)
::>c:: 0 ,> o 0
j< '" "' " .,
"- ';: 2 ~ 2
I
1< 0;'; " 0 0 ;" 0 in
I~ IUJZ ... Cl OJ " OJ ~
I~U; ... '" ... f\I f\I
'=: I '~I ~ ui rn fJl fJl
I :r :r I
~ I .;:., u. W w w W
, ~ I ~ ~ I- ~ ~ ~ -;;
i ~I::; -. _
j (1'1......1'1' ~ "- "-
Ii: i-I 0 " 0-
I ~Ig ~ 0 0 0
.. 0 01 '"
I Ii" 0' OJ f\I
!
'" <D
"- "-
In In
~ ~
"- "-
OJ OJ
I
1O ~l
'" "'I
,~
_-('W 7
--....I 8
~:iG
w:;~
H~Z
"> >- 0
, ... u
/
o
01
..
'"
'<J)
0::'
"-
---+
01"'
, a.
o ~
"
~J
Z
o
...
f-
U
UJ
~1
III
(l1
'to
(\J
(\J
'l'
GENER~L NOTES
~INI:;'i.
1. rCI'lEil ucSIGN CONFOP.~S 70 EIA STA~JOA.rm R~-222-C FOR 40/~a PS~ WINOLOAO WITH NO ICE.
I ..... '~AnT~t\L. I~: TOrlCR .."e:."1P:!ns .":/.;" .'.NO LARGr-n r.''f-5C. ::"00 oSI. (8) TOWER MEMBERS LESS THAN 3/4- Fy-36.000 PSI.
=~. ~~~E ~.rN:ED PRiOR ro SHIPMENT.
';' t-
otw
'"
rn
o
o
'l'
UJ
..J
o
ll.
4. ANTt.:.NNA~
110"r OIPF'~D ';;AL'''^NIlED .\'=i~i-1 r-:.Rnt(;J\TiGN.
ONE- CETEC J5i..P-2 2 8t. '( I'M o,~ PUL!: .ITH
THREE- PD11~,:D,~ J~O' .LTH 1-5/u" LINES
ONE- 08230 ~ 333' .ITH 7/6" LINE
ONE- 6' GRID DISH D 230' WITH 7/8" LINE
~-::/a. r..!~~
ONE- PD1:09 ~ 390', JG4', I> 330' .ITH :-5/6"
ONE- 6' GRID DISH l! 359' .ITH 1-5/8" I.INE
ONE- 18PD-70C , 315' .ITH 7/6" LINE
10' GRID DI5H AT 250' AND 175'
5, MIN, WEI.DS 1/4" UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL WEL~:S5 TJ :O~"ORM TO AWS SPECS,
~_ EIA GROUNDING FOR TCWER,
7, A- 2 I.IGHT KIT IN CCNOUIT PER FAA AC 7".114fi0-1G
I
I
I
I
L.
LINE
CELLULAR ONE r^R"'
NO, 104,603
CHESAPEAKE, VA,
I .!_ r~36/:~::~~~~FM' PI-ROD. INC.
~B ....".$..'" ,~~,
,l..,,, $",,~,...I~\::\.'I' iPPAUVE'osT- DR'B'( DATE PLYMOUTH. INDIANA 4G5G3
t~~ IllES~R:PT:C"{OATE JAS 12-APn-8'l
, REG, fNGINEER SCAI.E
_ ,__.. _ "==":'0:__ nEG, NO AS N,'TED
DWG "lO, 107 67L1
(08757,) .
PAGE
1 OF
z
o
....
t-
<l:
>
w
~I
~I
~I
I
I
I
1
~.
,,'
[ATTACHMENT EI
McGUIREWOODS
BATTLE&BooTHE
Thmspotomac Plaza
1199 North Fairfax Street
Alexandria. VA 22314
3950 Chain Bridge Road
Fairfax. VA 22030
World Thlde Center
Norfolk, VA 23510
Court Square Building
P.O. Box 1288
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
One James Center
Richmond. VA 23219
8280 Greensboro Drive
McLean. VA 22102
137 York Street
Williamsburg. VA 23185
(804) 977-2500
Fax: (804) 98()"2222
The Army and Navy Club Building
1627 Eye Street, N~.
Washington, DC 20006
March 14, 1991
Mr. william Fritz
Albemarle County Planning Department
P.O. Box 1009
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
MAR 14 1991
PLANNiNG DIViSION
Centel Cellular - Crozet
Dear Bill:
In connection with the above, I am enclosing herewith a sketch
showing the design of the proposed tower to be located on the
property Centel is acquiring from Acme visible. I will also
attempt to set out below a response by Centel to the questions you
raised earlier.
1. The Crozet site is necessary in order to provide quality
coverage west of the city along Interstate 64, U. S. Route 250, and
state Route 240, as well as the general area beginning
approximately at Farmington and running west to the mountains,
which would include Ivy and Crozet.
2. Cellular telephones have greatly increased their usage
and are important for commercial activity and often public safety
in emergency situations, having proven themselves as the key form
of communications in emergencies, the most recent example being
Hurricane Hugo.
3. Centel has always tried to pursue existing towers on
which to attach. However, in the Crozet area there are only two
towers, neither of which is available. The WCKY AM tower is not
available, as cellular telephone antennas could never put on AM
towers because of interference. The WCKY FM tower is located on
Little Yellow Mountain, which is too far to the west and therefore
will not serve the area necessary. The tower which is being
constructed will be capable of carrying other users and Centel will
cooperate with such other users, subject only to technical
requirements.
. .~. :.
..I
, .
March 14," 1991
Page 2
IATTACHMENT EI Ipage 2/
4. The proposed site is located in an industrial area, both
in terms of zoning and current usage. It will be adj oining
warehouses, an existing water tower, and the railroad tracks.
There are no residential areas close by. The site is positioned
at the rear of the Acme property, well removed from the road, and
its base will be below state Route 240 and therefore shielded from
view.
If we can provide any additional information, please let us
know.
very~ruly yours,
~- / // /
~ I 1/ i/! ~
j' ~vL:/ 1/ - ?,Lc;-C- '>.V
I
Fred S.\Landess
FSL/vcd
cc: Ms. Pattye Meggs
Mark Williamson, Esquire
BAFSL963.LTR
D'o""'h,oi"d to Bo~rn' q -[; -91 ~
L;lI lu.,a........ u '-~ .
Ar;enda Itern No. q J. () 31.0 ~ GJ8
r.,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ~
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. , County Executive ~I
DATE: September 4, 1991
RE: Recommendations of the E9ll Road Naming Committee
Attached are two lists of road names recommended by the E911 Road
Naming Committee for your review and adoption. One list provides
recommendations for public roads and the other list provides road
names for private roads. A large scale map of the public road
names is available in the Albemarle County Planning and Community
Development Department for your review prior to our meeting on
September 11. It will also be available at the meeting.
Staff recommends your adoption of the attached lists and approval
of the following procedure for naming roads:
o Changes to approved road names: Requests to change
Board approved road names must be submitted to the
Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community
Development and must be accompanied by a petition signed
by a majority of the landowners along such road.
Petitions will be reviewed by staff and, if acceptable,
will administratively approve the change. These changes
cannot be implemented until the County has assumed
operational control and maintenance of the locator system
scheduled for the summer of 1992.
o New/unnamed roads: All proposed road names for new or
unnamed roads coming under the E911 Locator System will
be submitted to the Planning and Community Development
Department by the developer/applicant for review,
administrative approval and entry into the locator
system. This procedure is incorporated in the
development review process and will ensure accuracy of
the locator system.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Cilimberg or me.
RWT,Jr/dbm
91.125
Attachment
which appears on the lists after adoption, the E9ll Road
Naming Committee recommends that a petition be submitted
signed by a majority of the residents on the road and acted
upon after the E9ll Building Location System is functional
and maintained by County staff. This would ensure that the
County would be able to meet its obligations with GTEGIS,
Inc. to implement the E9ll System on schedule.
Should you have additional questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
name tor Mechums RIver)
1
ROUTE #'s ROAD NAME DESCR 1 PT ION REASON/BACKGROUND MAG DIST
784 Burnt Mill Rd From 600 south to end Old road name RIV
784 Doctor's Crossing From 600 to 640 Citizen request RIV
799 Black Widow Ln From 600 south in Albemarle County Citizen request RIV
816 Willow Dale Lane Key West Dr to end Citizen request RIV
816 Key West Dr From 20 to Willow Dale Ln Subdivision name RIV
819 Judge Lane From 649 to end Named for judge RIV
807 Hawksh i II Ln From 746 to end Citizen request RIV
808 Running Deer Dr From U.S. 250 to end Existing adopted name RIV
823 Moose Lane From U.S. 250 to end Road beside Moose Lodge RIV
828 Whitetail Lane From 808 to end Existing subd. road name RIV
842 Cats Crossing From 616 to end Off of Black Cat Rd RIV
860 Klockner Rd From 231 to Louisa county line Name continued from RIV
Orange County
865 South Plains Lane From 685 to end Name of nearby church RIV
836 Albino Lane Running Deer subdivision Existing subd. road name RIV
1107 Camp Hill Rd 1107 from U.S. 250 to end Former campsite RIV
15
O'^""'u''''''''d to Bo~rrl' 9 -(y -:JL.
I~lj: ~1.1o.; \J ...." ~-~
p,r;enda l~,ern No. q I. (3)iJ ~ u.~
..,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
September 4, 1991
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Reconunendations of the E911 Road Naming Conunittee
Attached are two lists of road names recommended by the E911 Road
Naming Committee for your review and adoption. One list provides
recommendations for public roads and the other list provides road
names for private roads. A large scale map of the public road
names is available in the Albemarle County Planning and Community
Development Department for your review prior to our meeting on
September 11. It will also be available at the meeting.
Staff recommends your adoption of the attached lists and approval
of the following procedure for naming roads:
o Changes to approved road names: Requests to change
Board approved road names must be submitted to the
Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community
Development and must be accompanied by a petition signed
by a majority of the landowners along such road.
Petitions will be reviewed by staff and, if acceptable,
will administratively approve the change. These changes
cannot be implemented until the County has assumed
operational control and maintenance of the locator system
scheduled for the summer of 1992.
o New/unnamed roads: All proposed road names for new or
unnamed roads coming under the E911 Locator System will
be submitted to the Planning and Community Development
Department by the developer/applicant for review,
administrative approval and entry into the locator
system. This procedure is incorporated in the
development review process and will ensure accuracy of
the locator system.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Cilimberg or me.
RWT,Jr/dbm
91.125
Attachment
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Robert W. ~er, Jr., County Executive
Tex Weaver, Information Resource Planner
September 3, 1991
Enhanced 911 (E911) Road Naming Committee
Recommendations
Attached are road name recommendations for Albemarle County
provided by the E911 Road Naming Committee for adoption by
the Board of Supervisors. Attachment A consists of
recommendations for public roads adopted by the Committee on
Thursday, August 15, 1991. Attachment B consists of
recommendations for private roads, usually driveways which
serve three (3) or more dwellings, adopted by the Committee
on Thursday, August 29, 1991. The recommended road names
are to be used for the implementation of the E911 System as
called for in the contract between Albemarle County and
GTEGIS, Inc. (Exhibit A, Phase 1, Section 2.3) for a
Building Location System.
A list of officially adopted County roads will be forwarded
to GTEGIS, Inc. for address assignment. County residents
will be notified by the u.S. Postal Service of their new
address in Mayor June of 1992.
The Committee recommends that the attached lists be adopted
in total. Should a request be made to replace a road name
which appears on the lists after adoption, the E911 Road
Naming Committee recommends that a petition be submitted
signed by a majority of the residents on the road and acted
upon after the E911 Building Location System is functional
and maintained by County staff. This would ensure that the
County would be able to meet its obligations with GTEGIS,
Inc. to implement the E911 System on schedule.
Should you have additional questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
ATTACHMENT A
ROUTE #' s
ROAD NAME
601, 614, 676
Garth Rd
631, 780
Old Lynchburg Rd
633 Heards Mountain Rd
634 Spring Valley Rd
635 Miller School Rd
635 Craigs Store Rd
636 Batesville Rd
637 Dicl< Woods Rd
642 Red Hill Depot Rd
676 Tilman Rd
676, 678 Owensvi lle Rd
*677 Bloomfield Rd
*677 Old Ballard Rd
679 Grassmere Rd
681 Ragged Mountain Rd
682 Broad Axe Rd
688 Midway Rd
689 Pounding Creel< Rd
689 Doll ins Rd
689 Burch's Creel< Rd
DESCRIPTION
Rt. 601 from its intersection with 654
to 676, then 676 to 614, then 614 to its
intersection with 671.
780 from City limits to its
intersection with 631 then 631 to its
intersection with 712.
633 from U.S. 29 to its intersection
with 634
634 from 633 to 635
635 from U.S. 250 running south to 692
635 from 692 to Nelson County line
636 from its intersection with 635 to
Nelson County line
637 from U.S. 250 West to 750
642 in entirety (off of 708 at Red Hill)
676 running north from 738 to 678
678 nort~ from U.S. 250 to 676 then 676
north to its intersection with 614
677 from its intersection with 637
north to U.S. 250
677 north from U.S. 250 to 676
679 from 738 to end
681 from 637 to end
682 from 637 north to its intersection
wi th 787
688 from 689 to 635
689 from 637 to intersection with 635
689 from 637N to U.S. 250
689 from 635 to 637
1
REASON/BACKGROUND
Common usage and
historic reference to
Garth family.
Existing adopted name
from City to 708, common
usage.
Geographic reference and
coomuni ty name
Geographic reference
Named for Miller School
Named for former store
Reference to coomunity
name
Historic road name from
1740's
Site of Red Hill Depot
Early family name
Coomunity name
Existing adopted name
Existing adopted name
Extend subdivision road
name
Geographic reference
Common usage
Comnuni ty name
Geographic reference
Fami l y name
Historic road name
(Burch's Creel< local
name for Mechums River)
MAG DIST
SM
SM, SC
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM, WH
SM, WH
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
REASON/BACKGROUND ROAD NAME
691 Ortmann Rd
691 Castle Rock Rd
692, 712 Staunton-James River
Tpk
693 Burnt Mountain Rd
693
Sti llhouse Rd
694
Miller Lake Rd
695
Crown Orchard Rd
696
Edge Valley Rd
697
Sutherland Rd
698
Hungry town Rd
702
Reservoir Rd
706
Dudley Mountain Rd
708
Dry Bridge Rd
708, 710
Taylors Gap Rd
708
Red Hill Rd
711
Burton Rd
718
Murrays Lane
736
White Mtn Rd
738
Morgantown Rd
745
Arrowhead Rd
745
Poorhouse Rd
754
Loving Rd
760
Cherokee Rd
767
Rabbit Valley Rd
DESCR I PT ION
691 from U.S. 250 to 636
691 from 636 south to end
692 from U.S. 250 thru Batesville to
its intersection with 712 then 712 to
Rt. 20
693 from 635 to 695
693 from 692 to 695
694 from 693 to its end
695 from 693 to end
696 from 692 to 710
697 from 767 to its end
698 from 633 to its end
702 from Fontaine Ave Ext to its end
706 from 631 to 708
708 from 637 to U.S. 250
708 from 637 south to its intersection
with 710 then 710 to 760
708 from its intersection with 710
south to Rt. 20
711 from U.S. 29 to 712
718 from U.S. 29 to end
736 from 635 North to 636
738 in its entirety off of U.S. 250
745 from U.s. 29N to 29N
745 from 29 west to end
754 from 767 to end
760 from U.S. 29 to 712
767 from U.s. 29 to end
2
REASON/BACKGROUND
Named for philanthropist
Randolph Ortmann who was
resident along road
Geographic reference
Historic road name from
early 1800's
Geographic reference,
cOlll1lOn usage
Geographic/citizen request
Miller School reservoir SM
Reference to Crown Orchard SM
Citizen request SM
Historic landowner SM
Community name SM
Old Charlottesville SM
reservoir
Geographic reference
COIlI1lOn usage
Geographic reference
COIlI1lOn usage
Fami ly name
Fami ly name
Geographic reference
Historic community
Community name
Historic County Poorhouse
Fami l y name
Citizen request for
Indian family
Citizen request
MAG DIST
SM
SM
SM, ""H, S
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
REASON/BACKGROUND ROAD NAME
775 Rabbit Valley Ln
779 Rock Branch Rd
781 Sunset Ave Ext
739 Ivy Depot Ln
778 Johnson's Ln
712 North Garden Ln
782 Stribling Ave Ext
786 Ivy Depot Rd
787 Gillums Ridge Rd
791 ~ant Ln
801 Rock Branch Ln
804 Thacker's Lane
809 Canterbury Rd
813 Starlight Rd
814 Drovers Lane
818 Locust Hollow Ln
820 Buckingham Circle
824 Patterson Mill Ln
839 ~hipporwill Rd
846 Old Farm Rd
856 Burton Ln
F-178 Gold Eagle Dr
F-177 Langford Dr
658 Barracks Farm Rd
DESCRIPTION
Connector from u.S. 29 to 767
From 801 to 710
781 from city limits to 631
739 from 786 to end
778 from 712 to end
712 from u.S. 29 to 692
782 from Fontaine Ave to Stribling Ave
786 from u.S. 250 to 637
787 from u.S. 250 to 708
791 from 688 to end
From u.S. 29 to end
From u.S. 29 to end
809 from u.S. 250 to approx. 1 mile to
sharp left bend
From 712 North to end
From 692 to end
From 745 to end
820 from 702
824 from u.S. 250 to 688
From 676 to 614
846 fro 809 to end
856 from 711 to end
F-178 from u.S. 29 to end
F-177 from 637 to end
658 from 601 to end
3
REASON/BACKGROUND
Citizen request
Geographic reference
Continuance of City name
Road leads to site of
Ivy depot
Fami l y name
Community reference
Historic road name
Road leads to site of
Ivy depot
Extension of adopted name
Fami l y name
Geographic reference
Historic family name
Existing subdivision
road name
Citizen request
Historic ref. to home
Geographic reference
Existing subdivision name
Old mill located on
Stockton Creek
Existing subdivision
road name
Existing subdivision
road name
Family name
Citizen request
Reference to existing
subdivision
Leads to site of
Revolutionay ~ar
PO\.l camp
MAG DIST
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
JJ
ROUTE #'s
660
829
643
661
659
815
809
20
53
729, 732
795, 620
627, 795
729
618
619
795
727, 795
708
708
627
627
ROAD NAME
Rea's Ford Rd
Horseshoe Bend Rd
Rio Mill s Rd
Rea's Ford Lane
Woodburn Rd
Bellair Ln
Deer Path
Scottsville Rd
Thoroughfare Gap Rd
Mil ton Rd
Roll ing Rd
Carters Mountain Rd
Buck Island Rd
Martin King's Rd
Ruritan Lake Rd
Presidents Rd
Blenheim Rd
Secretary's Rd
Red Hi II Rd
Frys Path
Green Mountain Rd
DESCRIPTION
660 from 676 north to 743
829 from 601 to end
643 from u.S. 29 to 743
661 from 660 to end
659 from Rio Rd (631) to end
815 from 809 to 846
809 from dead end approx. .5 mile to
sharp bend
20 from Charlottesville city limits to
Scottsville town limit
53 from 20 to County line
732 from 53 to 729, then 729 to 53
795 from 627 to 620, 620 to county line
795 from 53 to 627, then 627 to 20 at
Carters Bridge
729 from 53 to 618
618 from 620 to county line
619 from 620 to county line
795 from 620 to 727
727 from 627 to 795. Rt. 795 from 727 to
Scottsville town limits
708 from 627 to 620
708 from Rt. 20 to district line
627 from 20 to 712
From 712 to 715
4
REASON/BACKGROUND MAG DIST
Historic road name JJ, CV
Leads to horseshoe bend JJ
in Rivanna River
Historic reference to CV, RIV
Rio Mills
Original route of Rea's CV
Ford Rd
Corrmm i ty name CV
Existing subdivision name CV
Existing subdivision CV
road name
Common local usage
SC
Historical name SC
Historical community name SC
Old Secretary's Rolling Rd SC
Historical name SC
Local name SC
Historical name SC
Request of local SC
inhabitants in Fluvanna
County
Reference to Monroe & SC
Jefferson property
Historical - 1740's SC
Historical - 1740's SC
Common local usage SC
Historical road name SC
Historical road name SC
ROUTE #'s
715
719
712
728
712
713
713
704
714
618
626
726, 627, 626
717, 755
6
724
602
735
625
627
627
723, 715
ROAD NAME
Esmont Rd
Alberene Rd
Staunton-James River
Tpk
Ed Jones Rd
Coles Rolling Rd
Glendower Rd
Oyer's Mill Ln
Fortune Lane
Riding Club Rd
Jefferson Mill Rd
Buck Langhorne Rd
James River Rd
Secretary's Sand Rd
Irish Rd
Lewiston Ford Rd
Howardsville Tpk
Mount Al to Rd
Hatton Ferry Rd
Warren Ferry Rd
Porters Rd
Chestnut Grove Rd
DESCRIPTION
REASON/BACKGROUND
715 from 20 at Keene to 6
Common local usage
719 from 712 to 715
Common local usage and
citizen request
712 from 20 at Keene to district line
Historical road name
from 1800's
728 from 620 to 729
Named for deceased
former resident of road
712 from 20 to Rt. 795
Historical - Citizens
request
713 from 795 to 20
Historical - Citizens
request
From 20S to end
Historical - Citizens
request
From 715 to end
Deceased persons name &
citizen request
From 20 to 715
Citizens request
From 795 to 620
Historical name
From 20 to 627
Named for Buck Langhorne
Citizen request
726 from 795 to 627 then 627 to 626
then 626 to Nelson County line
Historical--oldest
county road - 1730
717 from 708 to 755 then 755 to 6
Historical name from 1740's SC
6 from Valley Street to Nelson County line Historical road name
724 from 602 to end Historical road name
602 from C & 0 Railroad to 800 Historical road name
from early 1800's
735 from 626 to 602 Local name - Historical
- Citizens request
625 726 to Buckingham County line Historical name for
ferry and road
627 from 726 to Buckingham County line Historical community name
627 from 715 to 626 Commun i ty name
723 from 626 to 715 then 715 to 6 Community name
5
MAG DIST
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
ROUTE #'s ROAD NAME DESCRIPTION
723 Sharon Rd 723 from 715 to 6
735 Bear Creek Rd Nelson County line to end
737 Mountain View Rd From 6 to 6
734 Bishop Hill Rd From 795 to end
630 Green Creek Rd From 717 to Nelson County line
631 Old lynchburg Rd 780 from City limits to 631 then 631 to
712
633 Cove Garden Rd 633 from 712 to 29
812 Jim lane Rd 812 from 625 to end (C & 0)
637 Poplar Spring Rd All of 637 lying in Albemarle County
800 Schuyler Rd 800 from 6 to Nelson County line
826 Emery's Lane From 627 to end
607 Red Row lane From 715 to end
725 Dawsons Mill Rd From 627 to end
770 Mount Zion Church Rd From 627 to end
716 Forsyth Rd From 627 to 719
753 Pace's Store Rd From 712 to 6 to 627
757 Nelson's Rd From 627 to end
773 Pat Dennis Rd From 622 to county line
622 Albevana Spring Rd From 795 to county line to 618
638 Black's lane From 795 to end
761 Briery Creek lane From 622 to county line
864 Overlook Heights From 795 to end
632 Faber Rd From 29 to county line
6
REASON/BACKGROUND
MAG DIST
Church - local name
SC
Resident request - creek
name
SC
Common local usage SC
Common local usage SC
Citizens request SC
Historical road name SC
Citizens request SC
Former resident - local SC
Coomon usage
SC
COlll11On usage
SC
Former resident (deceased)
local request SC
local usage - Citizen SC
request
Historical site of mill SC
Old church name SC
Historic family name SC
Former loc~l storekeeper SC
(deceased)
Former landowner (deceased) SC
Named for former
resident (deceased) - SC
ci t i zen reques t
Historical reference to SC
Albevana Spring
Fami l Y name SC
Geographic reference SC
local name request SC
local usage - community SC
name
ROUTE #'s
699
840
837
838
841
805
748
793
792
701
718
631
655
670
721
722
717
733
762
720
729
722
1101
ROAD NAME
Boaz Rd
Cove School Rd
Cove School Lane
Lackey Lane
Covesville Lane
Henderson Lane
Broken Sun Rd
Thomas Lane
Stump Town Lane
Alberene Church Lane
Murray's Lane
Appleberry Mtn Rd
Christmas Hill Lane
Damon Rd
Old Dominion Rd
Lower Green Mtn Rd
Old Sand Rd
Campbell Farm Lane
Rose Hill Church Lane
Harris Creek Rd
North Mi l ton Rd
Jopl in Ford Rd
Old Hartmans Mill Rd
DESCRIPTION
REASON/BACKGROUND
From 29 to end
Old family name
From 837 to end
Reference to Covesville
schoolhouse
From 29 to end
Reference to Covesville
schoolhouse
From 29 to end
Name of former resident
killed in accident
From 29 to end
Cornnuni ty name
From 29 to end
Local family name
From 633 to end
Citizen request
From 719 to end
Local family name
From 719 to end
Conmunity name
From 717 to end
Old church/local name
From 29 to end
Local family name
From 712 to end
Local old road name
From 712 to end
Local name - Citizen
request
From 717 to end
Historical conmunity name
From 6 to 630
Historical conmunity name
From 602 to 6
Historical road name
(Green Mt)
From 755 to 6
Historical road name
from 1740's
733 from 729 to end
Citizen request
762 from 732 to end
Old Rose Hill Church
720 from 20 to end
Old name of creek -
Citizen request
729 from 250 to 732
Historic conmunity name
722 from 602 to county line
Historical-site of ford
From 742 to end
Historical reference to
mill on Moores Creek
7
MAG DIST
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC, RIV
SC
SC
ROUTE #'s
617
610
613
317
1102
810
687
810
628, 663, 810
ROAD NAME
Rockfish River Rd
Mission Home Rd
Giannini Ln
Blue Ridge Hosp Dr
Michie Tavern Lane
Boonesville Rd
Shifflett's Mill Rd
Blackwells Hollow Rd
Sinmon's Gap Rd
388 PVCC Dr
703 Pocket Ln
664 Markwood Rd
669 Bingham Church Lane
664 Fray'S Mtn Rd
743 Advance Mills Rd
641 Fray's Mi II Rd
606 Dickerson Rd
743 Earl ysvill e Rd
662 Bleak House Rd
601
Free Union Rd
J 1301
Warren Street
DESCRIPTION
From 602 to Nelson County line
610 north of 801 to Greene county
line
613 from 602 to end
317 from 20 to end
1102 from 53 to end
810 from 601 to 628 thru Village of
Boonesville
687
810 from 629 north to 601
628 from Greene county line to 810 to
663 then 663 to its intersection with
664 then 664 to 665
388 from 20 to end
703 from 715 to end
664 starting at 665 to 810
West of 810 at County line
664 from 604 to 743
743 from 663 to Greene county line
641 from 743 to u.s. 29
606 from 641 to 743
743 from 663 to 676
662 from 660 to 665
601 from 676 to 810
From town of Scottsville to 726
8
REASON/BACKGROUND MAG DIST
Geographic reference SC
Coomon usage WH
Family name SC
Serves Blue Ridge Hosp SC
Request of Michie Tavern SC
Community & common usage WH
Historic site and name WH
Historic road name WH
Historic road name WH
Road to community college SC
Local name, residents req. SC
Historic plantation WH
First Methodist Church WH
in Albemarle County
Geographic feature and WH
coomon name
Community and historic WH
road name
Historic name of Advance WH
Mills
1780 early settler and WH
road name
Existing adopted name WH
Historic house name WH
Formerly "original
Barracks Rd"
Coomon usage WH
Extension of existing name SC
ROUTE #'s
ROAD NAME
663, 665, 671, 614 Buck Htn Rd
810, 789, 788, 684
671
Ballards Mill Rd
821
Blufton Hill Rd
766
Pea Ridge Rd
674
Clark Rd
614
Sugar Hollow Rd
674
Wyant Ridge Rd
674
Break Heart Rd
673
Slam Gate Rd
672
Via Lane
756
CCC Road
668, 765
Walnut Level Rd
624
Headquarters Lane
629, 810, 680
Browns Gap Tpk
811
Jones Mill Rd
240
Three Notch'd Rd
752
Hechums River Rd
683
Shel ton Mi II Rd
751
Brownsville Rd
635
Hiller School Rd
684
Hint Springs Rd
DESCRIPTION
Starting at 743, 663 to 665, then 665 to
671, then 671 to 614, then 614 to 810,
then 810 to 789, then 789 to 788,
then 788 to 684, then 684 to 797
From 609 to 665
821 from 671 to end
From 614 to end
674 from 810 to 671
614 West of 810 to end (at reservoir)
674 from 673 to 614
674 from 810 to 673
673 North of 674 to 810
672 West of 810 to end
756 from 668 to end
668 from 810 to 765, then 765 to end
624 from 629 to end
680 from 802 to 810, then 810 to 629
then 629 to end
811 East of 810 to 680
240 from 810 to u.S. 250
752 in its entirety (off of u.s. 250)
683 from 751 to end
751 in its entirety from u.S. 250 to end
635 from 250 to 692
684 from 788 to end
9
REASON/BACKGROUND
Historic road from 1740's
Historic road name and site WH
Historic road name
COITII1On usage
COITII1On usage, name of
early settler
COITII1On usage
Historic road name early
1790's
1790 road name
Historic road name
Early settlers
fami l y name
Built by Hoormans River
CCC Camp.
Historic Brown family
home early 1800's
Historic Brown family
home early 1800's
1806 road name
Historic road name and
site
Historic road name
COlIlllUn i ty name
Historic name and site
Historic community
1876 road improved to
connect Millers School
to railroad, cOlTll1On usage
C OITII1On Name
MAG DIST
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH, SM
WH
ROUTE #'s
788
1202
1216
1203
1209
1201
1201
1201
1215
691
691
1210
1210, 1204
1205
1204
797
825
611, 691
691
690
690
827
250
ROAD NAME
Railroad Ave
St. George Ave
loIayland Dr
St. George St
Haden Lane
Blue Ridge Ave
Carter St
McComb Rd
Killdeer lane
Tabor St
Hill Top St
Ell ison St
High St
Myrtle St
Park Rd
Hill sboro Lane
Yancey Mill Lane
Jarman's Gap Rd
Greenwood Rd
Greenwood Station Rd
Newtown Rd
Beagle Gap Rd
Rockfish Gap Tpk
DESCRIPTION
788 East of 789 to 810
1202 in its entirety
1216 in its entirety
1203 in its entirety
1209 in its entirety
1201 parallel to Carter St from
McComb Rd to 691
1201 nearest 240 from its intersection
with 691 to the sharp left before
railroad tracks
1201 parallel to the railroad from
Carter St to Blue Ridge Ave
1215 from 691 to end
691 east from 240 to 1204
691 east from 1204 to end
1210 from sharp bend to end, parallel
to Tabor St
1210 from 1204 north to sharp left, and
1204 south from 1210 .08 mi to sharp left
1205 east from 1204 to end
1204 beginning at sharp bend .23 mi.
from 240 to end
797 in its entirety from U.S. 250 to end
825 in its entirety
691 west of 240 to 611, then 611 to end
691 from 611 to 250
690 from U.S. 250 to bend at former
depot site
690 loIest from bend at former
depot site to 796
827 from 691 to end
U.S. 250 from 678 to Nelson County line
10
REASON/BACKGROUND
Conmon name
Conmon name
Conmon name
Conmon name
Original name of lane
leading to Haden
farmhouse
Conmon usage
Conmon usage
Original name
Conmon usage
Conmon usage
Conmon usage
Conmon usage
Conmon usage
Conmon usage
Conmon usage
COITIl1Un i ty name
COITIl1Un i ty name
Conmon name
Historic road name
Historic road name, road
leads to depot site
COITIl1Unity name
Historic road name
Historic road name
MAG DIST
IoIH
IoIH
IoIH
IoIH
IoIH
IoIH
IoIH
IoIH
\.JH
\.JH
\.JH
\.JH
\.JH
\.JH
\.JH
\.JH
\.JH
IIH
IIH
\.JH
\.JH
\.JH
\.JH
ROUTE #'s ROAD NAME DESCRIPTION
750 Old Turnpike Rd 750 from u.S. 250 to Nelson County line
803 Goodloe Lane 803 from 750 to 6
796 Brooksville Rd 796 in its entirety (off u.S. 250)
758 Smith Rd From 637 to end
736 Pugh's Store Rd 736 from 636 N to end
151/6 Critzer's Shop Rd 6 from u.S. 250 S to Nelson County line
F-172 Little Rock Lane F-172 from u.S. 250 to end
F-173 Summer Rest Lane F-173 from 690 to end
F -174 Green Hill Lane F-174 from 690 to end
F-182 Tiffany Lane F -852 from u.S. 250 to end
9003 Greenwood Loop 9003 in its entirety
668 Chapel Spring Lane 668 E of 671 to 601
609, 671, 749
Wesley Chapel Road
609 from 665 to 671, then 671 from 609
to 749, then 749 from 671 to 601
678
Ridge Road
678
668
Batten Road
668 N of 765 to end
666
Allen Road
666 from 664 to end
F-175
Glentivar Lane
F-175 from 691 to end
798
Point Grove
798 from 691 to end
606
Spr i ng Hill Rd
606 N of 641 to Greene County line
605
Durrett Ridge Rd
605 from 604 to 743
810
Dyke Rd
810 N of 663 to Green County line
604, 664
Buffalo River Rd
664 from 663 to 604, then 604 to Greene
County line
11
REASON/BACKGROUND
Historic route of R.G. &
S/Jr. Tpk's
Early settlers name
COITIIllJnity name
Historic road, early
settler
Former store, early 1900s
Old cOlTllllJnity name
Railroad tunnel located
nearby
Former Episcopal retreat
Homeowners recommendation
Former access to Tiffany
farm
Greenwood School name
Historical reference to
spring which served
Wesley Chapel
Historic road name
Existing adopted name
Historic name, early
landowner
Historic name, early
settler
Ca. 1840 house built by
Rev. Samuel Blaine
Name of only house served
by road 0.2 mile long
Church name
Early settler ca. 1841
COI1IIlOn usage
Historical geographic
feature
MAG DIST
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
ROUTE #'s ROAD NAME
675 Lake Albemarle Rd
669, 675 Lakeside Dr
668 Fox Mountain Rd
671 Davis Shop Rd
603 Plunkett Rd
1200 Sunrise Acres St
1200 Daybreak Lane
672 Blufton Rd
1217 The Square
763 Dickerson Lane
764 Link Evans Lane
817 Roach Ridge
653 Old Free Union Rd
F-176 Tom Wol fe Lane
707 Lickinghole Lane
776 Buck Mtn Ford Rd
667 Catterton Rd
806 Estes Ridge
811 Beaver Creek Lane
240, 810 Crozet Ave
20N Stony Point Rd
22NE Louisa Rd
F-179 Hansens Mtn Rd
F-181 Woodbound Rd
F-180 Inn Dr
DESCRIPTION
675 from 614 to 669
669 from 675 to end and 675 from 669 to
end
668 between 810 and 671
671 from 664 to 749
603 from 663 to Greene County line
1200 from 810 approx. .8 mi to bend
1200 from bend to end
672 east from 810 to end
1217 from 240 to end
763 from 29 to 606
764 from 663 to end
817 from 604 to end
653 from 601 to end
F176 form 690 to end
F707 from 691 to end
776 from 667 to 664
667 from 665 to 601
806 from 663 to end
811 west from 810 to end
240 from U.S. 250 to 810, then 810 to
789
20 N from U.S. 250 to Orange county line
From U.S. 250 to Louisa county line
From U.S. 250 to end
From U.S. 250 to end
F-180 from U.S. 250 to end
12
REASON/BACKGROUND MAG DIST
Common usage and WH
geographic reference
Road along edge of Lake WH
Albemarle
Historic road name WH
Historic reference WH
Historic road name WH
Development name WH
Landowner suggestion WH
Historic road name WH
Common usage WH
See Dickenson Rd (606) WH
Former resident WH
(deceased) - Local request
Family name WH
Old route of Free Union Rd WH
Deputy sheriff killed in WH
line of duty - request
Geographic reference WH
Citizen request and WH
reference to Buck Mtn Creek
Early landowner 1800 WH
CA 1840 family name WH
Geographic reference WH
Community name WH
Community name - common RIV
usage
Road leads to Louisa RIV
For sculptor Hansen RIV
Historic farm road RIV
Road serving Quality Inn RIV
ROUTE #'s
250E
231NE
600
600
600
600
608
610
612
616
615
621
623
639
640
640
641
641
643
644
645
645
646
ROAD NAME
Richmond Rd
Gordonsville Rd
Stony Point Pass
Campbe II Rd
Cismont Lane
Watts Passage
Happy Creek Rd
Lonesome Mtn Rd
HalllllOcks Gap Rd
Black Cat Rd
Lindsay Rd
Wolf Trap Rd
Woods Edge Rd
Harrington Rd
Gilbert Station Rd
Turkey Sag Rd
Burnley Station Rd
Echo Valley Rd
Polo Grounds Rd
Burnley Rd
Wildon Grove Rd
Magnol i a Rd
Lovers Lane
DESCRIPTION
From city limits to Louisa county line
From 22 to Louisa county line
From 20 to Rt. 231
From 22 at Cismont to Louisa county line
600 from 231 to 22
600 from 20 to 641
From 646 to 645
From 20 to end
From 20 to end
616 from 22 to Fluvanna County line
615 from 231 to Louisa County line
From 20 to end
From 616 to end
North from 615 to end and South from
615 to end
640 from 20 to 641
From 20 to 22 and from 22 to end
From 20 to 29
From 20 east to end
From 649 to 29
From 641 to Orange county line
From 608 south to end
From 608 north Orange county line
From 231 to Orange county line
13
REASON/BACKGROUND MAG DIST
Road leads to Richmond RIV
Road leads to Gordonsville RIV
Name of pass in SW Mtns. RIV
Community name - Citizen RIV
request
Community name RIV
Common usage - citizen req. RIV
Geographic reference RIV
Geographic reference - RIV
Citizen req.
Historic road name RIV
Common usage R I V
Community name RIV
Geographic feature and RIV
citizens request
Subdivision on road RIV
Reference to Harringtons RIV
Store and family name
Community name based on RIV
rail depot
Historic road name from RIV
1740's
Community name based on RIV
rail depot
Citizen request RIV
Common usage RIV
Name continued from RIV
Orange County
Wildon Grove Church RIV
Name continued from RIV
Orange County
Name continued from RIV
Orange County
ROUTE #'s
647
648
649
664
685
686
700
709
730
731
740
744-E
744 - '>I
741
746
747
747
759
777
769
783
794
785
763
ROAD NAME
Maxfield Rd
Clarke Tract
Proffitt Rd
Buzzard Hollow Rd
South Plains Rd
Paddock '>Iood Rd
Watts Farm Rd
Shadwell Rd
Hoover Lane
Keswick Rd
Zion Hill Rd
Hacktown Rd
Hunt Club Rd
Mossing Ford Rd
Fosters Branch Rd
Preddy Creek Rd
Emerald Lake Rd
Three Chopt Rd
Vineyard Rd
Rocky Hollow Rd
Merrie Mill Rd
Short Rd
Prichett Lane
McConnell Rd
DESCR 1 PTl ON
From 22 to end
From 22 to end
From 20 to 29
From Orange county line to end
From 616 to end
From 600 to Louisa county line
From 600 to end
From 250 to end
From 731 to end
From U.S. 250 to 22
From 231 to 22
From U.S. 250 to 731
From 731 to 22
From 649 to end
From 20 to end
From 600 to 640
Connector from 747 to 640
250E to 616
From Orange county line to end
From 20E to end and from 20'>1 to end
From 231 to 22
749 from 250 to 616
From 649 to end
763 from 29 to 606
14
REASON/BACKGROUND MAG DIST
Citizen request RIV
Historic road name 1740's RIV
Common usage, community RIV
name
Name continued from RIV
Orange County
Name of nearby church RIV
Citizen request RIV
Citizen request-historic RIV
fami ly name
Community name RIV
Former resident (deceased) RIV
Community name RIV
Name of nearby church RIV
Common usage RIV
Citizen request RIV
Road to old ford-request RIV
of Proffit Neighborhood
Assoc.
Geographic reference RIV
Geographic reference RIV
Subdivision reference RIV
Historic road name 1740's RIV
Name continued from RIV
Orange County
Continued existing RIV
adopted name
Historic mill site RIV
Short road-no history RIV
Family name RIV
Named for deceased mail RIV
carrier
ROUTE #'s
ROAD NAME
784
Burnt Mill Rd
784
Doctor's Crossing
799
Black Widow Ln
816
Willow Dale Lane
816
Key West Dr
819
Judge Lane
807
Hawkshill Ln
808
Running Deer Dr
823
Moose Lane
828
Whitetail Lane
842
Cats Crossing
860
Klockner Rd
865
South Plains Lane
836
Albino Lane
1107
Camp Hill Rd
DESCRIPTION
From 600 south to end
From 600 to 640
From 600 south in Albemarle County
Key West Dr to end
From 20 to Willow Dale Ln
From 649 to end
From 746 to end
From U.S. 250 to end
From U.S. 250 to end
From 808 to end
From 616 to end
From 231 to Louisa county line
From 685 to end
Running Deer subdivision
1107 from U.S. 250 to end
15
REASON/BACKGROUND
Old road name
Citizen request
Citizen request
Citizen request
subdivision name
Named for judge
Citizen request
Existing adopted name
Road beside Moose Lodge
Existing subd. road name
Off of Black Cat Rd
Name continued from
Orange County
Name of nearby church
Existing subd. road name
Former campsite
MAG DIST
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
ATTACHMENT B
1.0./ MAP NUMBER
104 (E2)
143 (03)
206 (F5)
231 (E5)
233 (E5)
241 (E5)
242 (F5)
409 (B3)
1222 (G4)
1242 (E4)
1247 (E4)
1263 (E4)
1310 (G5)
1314 (G5)
1315 (F5)
1330 (F4)
1414 (B3)
1417 (B4)
1426 (C3)
1428 (03)
1430 (B3)
1436 (04)
1712 (G4)
2052 (G5)
2053 (G5)
2241 (G4)
2328 (E3)
2346 (F3)
ROAD NAME DESCRIPTION
Hedge Hall Lane Off 633
Brandlin Drive Off Route 20 north of 720
Scott Hill Lane Off 795 between 627 and 620
Glenridge Lane Off 620
Gilmer's Mill Lane Off 620
Saddlewood Trail Off 729
~alker's Lane Off 729 north of 728
Crawford Farm Lane Off 627 between 726 and 626
Biscuit Run Lane Off 631
Cedar Grove Lane Off 627
Redlands Drive Off 708 east of 627
Bellair Farm Off 708
Crestview Lane Off 53
Ashlawn/Highland Drive Off 795
~ells Court Off 53 west of 729
Ellerslie Drive Off 627 (Albemarle Farms)
Greenfield Farm Off 626 at intersection with 627
Hatton Grange Farm Off 625 between 726 and 812
Esmont Farm Off 719 west of 715
Rin-Ran Farm Off 719 east of 716
Donegal Farm Off 726 east of 627
Mount Pleasant Farm Off 795
Forrest Lodge Drive Off 631
Jefferson Lake Drive Off 53 east of 1102
Mountain Top Farm Off 53 east of 1102
Forrest Lodge Lane Off Forrest Lodge Drive (Off 631)
Quality Row Off 719
Richlands Drive Off 631 north of 708
1
REASON/BACKGROUND DISTRICT
Owner's Request SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Resident's Request SCV
Resident's Request SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Resident's Request SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Farm Name SCV
Request - Mr. James SCV
Director's Request SCV
Resident's Request SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Farm Name SCV
Farm Name SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Farm Name SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Farm Name SCV
Resident's Request SCV
Resident's Request SCV
Owner's Request SCV
Resident's Request SCV
Historical - Citizen's Request SCV
Resident's Request SCV
2436 (F5)
2445 (F6)
2483 (05)
2487 (05)
2620 (C4)
2620 (E5)
2620 (E5)
2620 (F5)
2620 (G5)
2620 (G5)
2620 (C4)
2620 (01)
1383 (03)
1339 (E4)
1339 (E4)
794 (E2)
1049 (C3)
1353 (B2)
1579 (02)
1619 (C3)
1637 (C2)
1718 (04)
1783 (01)
1790 (01)
1796 (01)
1798 (02)
2060 (01)
2059 (C1)
2062 (C1)
Quarry Creek Lane
Garland Lane
Black Branch Farm
Spradlin Kennel Lane
Fariview Farm
Jacobs Creek Drive
Rustic Acres
Shuvee Drive
Simeon Lane
Kirby Lane
Marshall Lane
Schoolhouse Court
Nydrie Drive
Old Bank's Farm
Payne's Lane
Braxton Road
Bridlewood Trail
Limestone Drive
Sneads Hill Road
East Hundred Lane
Cloverfield Farm
Strawberry Hill Road
Pigeon Hill
Sulphur Mine Road
proffi~Station Road
Rivanna Farm Road
Quarles Road
Ridgeway Farm
Alcova Road
Off 795
Off 53
Off 618
Off 618
Off 20 between 626 and 726
Off 620 imm. S of Buck Island Creek
Off 620 south of 618
New Morven Study entrance
Off 53 at 795
Off 53
Off 20 at 737 intersection
Off 837
Off 627 north of 715
Off 727 north of 795
Off 727
Off 640 east of 784
Off 22 \J of 640
Off 250 past 808, Limestone Farm
Off 784
N side 22 at Louisa line
Off 22 opposite 648
Off 231 between 2 bridges
Off 643
Off 649
Off 649
Off 20 north of 649
Off 649 at Evergreen Farms
Off 20N south of Eastham
Off 20N south of Eastham
2
Resident's Request
Resident's Request
Owner's Request
Owner's Request
Old Farm Name
Resident's Request
Owner's Request
Owner's Request
Geographic reference
Owner's Request
Resident's Request
Resident's Request
Owner's Request
Owner's Request
Owner's Request
Resident request
Resident request
Limestone Farm
Request
Request Blair
Request Barner
Old Farm Name
Descriptive
Request Proffit N Assoc.
Request Proffit N Assoc.
Farm Name
Request Proffit N Assoc.
Name of Farm
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
SCV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
Series of A Frames-Alcova is own.RIV
RIV
2063 (C1)
2070 (C1)
2073 (C1)
2076 (C1)
2080 (02)
2082 (02)
2088 (C1)
2081 (C2)
2096 (B2)
2105 (C2)
2103 (C2)
2113 (B2)
2943 (E2)
3172 (02)
3186 (04)
3187 (03)
3207 (C3)
(01)
(01)
(02)
(C1)
(02)
(02)
(F2)
(B2)
1515 (E2)
Eastham Hill Road
Persimmon Hill Road
Sassafrass Hill Road
Serpentine Lane
Barrsden Road
Cut Over Hill
Annex Road
Little Mtn Farm
Barn Branch Road
Lonesome Mtn Hollow
Bellafield Road
Glenmore Way
Brock's Mill Road
Brook Mi II Lane
Ellen's Spring Road
Storemont Road
Holly Ridge Road
Martha's Place
Fall Field Road
Sports Club Road
Thurman Tract
Double C Road
Timber Pass
Sandy Branch Road
Hearns Lane
Jessie's Lane
Rivers Edge Road
Schroeder Court
Triangle Court
Off 20N near Eastham P.O.
Off 20N before Ridgeway Farm
Off 20N past 769
1st left off 621 off 20N
20N before 649
20N before 746
W side of 20N past 769
Off 610
Off 250E west of 22
Off 610
Off 610
Off 250E at Glenmore
Off N side 640 E of 784
Off 784 before 640
Off 231 south of 860
Off N side of 600
Off 231 between 740 and 783
Off 643 W of Bentivar
Off 649 N side before 741
Off 746 to left near end
Off 20N before 621
West side 20N before 649
East side 20N before 746
Off 641 between 600 and 640
West side of 808
N side of 784
Off 29N before N. Fork Rivanna River
Off west side of 743 N of 844
Off 631 north of 743 (Triangle
Trailer Ct)
3
Cornwnity Name
Request of 5 residents
Farm Name
Request of resident
Request of Six Residents
Descriptive
Geographic relationship
Name on Tree
Nearby Branch
Request Broadbetn, Kullman
Farm Name
Farm Name
Resident request
Resident request
Request of Resident
Farm Name
Name of Hill
COIl1l1On usage
Request Proffit N Assoc.
Sports Club at end of road
Request Schultz
Farm Name
Lots of Trees
Name of Branch
Fami l y Name
Request-owner claycrest
Existing cornwnity
Reference to creek
Existing cornwnity
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
CH
CH
Crenshaw Court
Off 631 north of 743 (Crenshaw
Trai ler Ct)
Existing community
CH
Fountain Court
Off 631 (Rio Road East)
Fountain Court Apartments
CH
Pine Haven Court
Off 631 (Rio Road East)
Pine Haven Apartments
CH
1733 and 1731 (C1) Schelford Farm
Off 614
Owner's Request JJ
1734 (C1) Woodson Lane
Off 676
Request - Frank Peters JJ
1755 (C2) Mt Aire Rock Lane
Off 676
Request - Resident JJ
1758 (C2) Rayford Farm
Off Audobon Dr i ve off 660
Owner's Request - Name of Farm JJ
1900 (B1) Ingleside Farm Lane
Off 601
Owner's Request - Name of Farm JJ
1921 and 1922 (A2) Faulconer Drive
Off 601
Extension of Faulconer Drive JJ
1952 (A2) Witches Breath Road
Off Alderman and Observatory Roads
Ref. to creek now underground JJ
2845 (C1) Locust Grove Lane
Off 829
Name of Farm JJ
9009 (C2) Tuckahoe Farm lane
Off 676
Named Subdivision JJ
Piedmont Court
Off Mimosa Drive
Piedmont House
JJ
Old Salem Loop
Off Barracks Road
Old Salem Apartments
JJ
1458 (F4)
Fox Mountain Trail
Off 671 south of 601
Geographical
WH
800 (F4)
Rockybar Road
Off 601 north of 810
Geographical
WH
2852 (F4)
Boonesville Ridge
Off 601 south of 810
Community
WH
2803 (F4)
Harris Mountain Road
Off 810 north of 601
Resident's Request
WH
735 (F2)
Short Rock Road
Off u.S. 29 north of 641
Citizen Request
WH
880 (B1)
Still Meadow Lane
Off 750 west of 803
Farm
WH
F-182/1553,1528/
2983,2931 (B1)
Royal Orchard Drive
250 to Skyline Drive
Resident Request
WH
1552 (B1)
Scott Mountain Trail West from Royal Orchard Drive Geographical WH
Bear Den Mtn Trail N W from Skyline Drive Geograph i ca l WH
Far Fields Lane Off 250 west of 750 Farm WH
Tanyard Path Off 796 Historical References WH
New York Trace Off 796 Historical References WH
Little York Heights Off New York Trace Historical References WH
Mountain Hollow Road Off 690 south of 1-64 Subdivision Name WH
3009 (B1)
(B1)
(B1)
(B1)
(B1)
(B1)
4
, .
3119 (B2)
3145 (B2)
Greenwood Farm
Seven Oaks Farm
Off 250 east of 690
Off 250 and 690
Off 250 and 691
Farm
Farm
Farm
2991,2992,3023 (B2) Mirador Farm
2982 (B2)
811 (B2)
2980 (B2)
3021 (B2)
922 (B2)
3081,3083 (B2)
(B3)
3106 (B3)
3072 (B3)
(83)
2977 (C1)
(Cn
2974 (C1)
3020 (C1)
1524 (C2)
929 (C2)
(C2)
(C2)
938 (C2)
1556 (C2)
3053 (C2)
3060 (C2)
3064 (C2)
3059 (C2)
(C3)
(C3)
Greenwood Hollow Off 690
Dinwiddie ~ay Off 690 west of 691
Corville Farm Road Off 691 north of 690
Monterey Farm Off 691 north of 690
Free Town Lane Off 250 east of 797
Rothwell Lane Off 691 west of 1215
Geographical Reference
Citizen
Parson's Green Lane Off 250 between 751 and 752
Tiffany Development
Farm
COlIIl1On Usage
Citizen Request
Resident
Citizen
Radford Lane Off 250 east of 751
Union Mission Lane Off 240 across RR tracks
Chruch Name
Geographical
Geographical
Historical Geo. Reference
Park Lane Off 1204 west of 1220
Beagle Gap Trail Off Skyline Drive
~ood's Gap Road Off 611
Calf Mountain Road Off 611
South Fork Trail Off 611 at Skyline Drive
Buck's Elbow Mtn. Road Off 611
Sealville Road Off 684 at end
Seal Ridge Off 684 at end
Saddle Hollow Court Off Saddle Hollow Road
Burnt Acres Court Off 684 west of 788
Geographical
Geographical
Geographical
Residents
Residents
Geographical
Conmon Usage
Mint Springs Park Off 684
McAllister Street Off 1202
McComb Street Off 1201
Buford Street Off 1201
Pleasant Green Street Off 1201
Rockery Place Off 810 south of 811
Rose Valley Farm Off 811 east of 810
Park Name
Citizen
COlIIl1On Usage
Subdivision Name
Historical Site
Current Name
Farm
5
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
~H
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
(C3)
3038 (C3)
(C3)
(C3)
(C3)
3036 (C3)
963 (C3)
9004 (C4)
1721 (C4)
1720 (C4)
1727 (C4)
2729 (02)
2976 (02)
2797 (02)
3031 (02)
(02)
2765 (02)
3034 (03)
967 (03)
(03)
(03)
2762 (03)
2763 (03)
1449 (03)
540 (03)
2764 (03)
2768 (03)
2784 (03)
(05)
Beaver Ridge
Holly Hill Farm
Long Meadow Lane
\lard Lane
Meeks Run
Ringwood Farm
Cedar Knoll Lane
Timber Point
Fallen Leaf Lane
Yule Farm
Midway Farm
Turk's Gap Road
Oistillery Trail
Black Rock Gap Road
Off 811 between 810 and 680
Off 810 across from 811
Off 810 north of 811
Off 810 north of 811
Off 810 north of 811
Off 810 south of 614
Off 766
Off 614 east of 678
Off 614 west of Ounmore Road
Off 614 west of Ounmore Road
Off 614 west of 678
Off 614 at reservoir
Off Turk's Gap Road
Off 614 at reservoir
Burnt House Hollow Road Off 614 east of reservoir
Puppy Run Farm
Carr's Ridge
Batna Farm
Piedmont Place
Sandridge Knoll
Meadowwood Lane
Steppe Ridge
Viewpoint Lane
Mt Aire Farm
Bourne Farm
Pigeon Top Trail
Tucked Away Farm
Ounrorin Farm
Peachcroft Lane
Off 614 between reservoir and 614
Off 674 north of 614
Off 810 south of 680
Off 614 west of 810
Off 674 west of 673
Off 674 west of 673
Off 673 north of 674
Off 810 north of 674
Off 810 north of 672
Off 674 east of 810
Off 674 east of 810
Off 674 east of 810
Off Tucked Away Farm
Off 660 south of 672
6
Subdivision
Farm
Subdivision
Residents
Residents
\lH
\lH
\lH
\lH
\lH
\lH
WH
\lH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
\lH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
WH
\lH
\lH
\lH
Farm
Residents
Residents
Residents
Farm
Farm
Geographical
Historical
Georgraphical
Geographical
Farm
Citizen
Farm
Resident
Cemetery
Resident
Resident
Resident
Farm
Resident
Geographical
Farm
Farm
Resident request
(06)
2888 (06)
3376 (E2)
(E2)
3377 (E2)
(E2)
555 (E3)
(E3)
612 (E4)
653 (E4)
685 (E5)
2823 (E5)
663 (E5)
(E5)
(E5)
2828 (E5)
1462 (E5)
2881 (E6)
(E6)
(E6)
2865 (E6)
1479 (E6)
(F2)
3380 (f3)
565 (F3)
2756 (F3)
579 (F3)
2753 (F3)
2810 (F5)
Wakefield Farm
Crickenberger Lane
Joe Harris Trail
Vi a Gap Trai l
Off Earlysville Forest Drive
Farm
WH
Off 606 north of Airport
Citizen
WH
From Black Rock Gap Rd to Pasture
Fence Mtn Trai l
COl1l1lOn Usage
WH
From Black Rock Gap north
Geographical
WH
Turk's Lane
Pasture Fence Mtn Trail From 673 west and north along mountain Geogrphical
WH
School Hill
Innisfree Lane
Hidden Springs Lane
Burning Daylight Farm
Garrison Lane
Allen Farm Lane
Windward Farm
Home Place
Eliza Lane
Via Ridge
Elk Run Lane
Goose Call Run
Jacob's Run
Foot of the Mtn Lane
Laurel Ridge Road
Piney Mountain Road
Cedar Mountain Trail
Little Flat Mtn Trail
Blue Fox Farm
Chap Place Lane
Adventure Bound Lane
Rockybar Hollow Lane
Wilhoit Mill Road
WH
Off 672 Citizen
Off 810 north of 668 COl1l1lOn Usage
WH
Off 765 Resident
WH
Off 668 west of 671 Farm
WH
Off 671 north of 609 Farm
WH
Off 776 south of 664 Cemetery
WH
From 666 west to 776 Historical Farm
WH
Off 663 north of 664 Farm
WH
Off 663 north of 664 Resident request
WH
Off 604 north of 664 Gravestone on road
WH
Off 665 south of 664 Residents
WH
Off 665 south of 664 Farm/Stream name
WH
Off 743 across from Earlysville Forest Citizen
WH
Off 743 north of 664 Citizen
WH
Off 641 east of 743 Resident request
WH
Off 641 between 743 and 606 Subdivision
WH
Off 606 south of 763 Geographical
WH
Off CCC Road Geographical
WH
Off 629 Geographical
WH
Off 810 south of 629 Farm
WH
Off 810 between 629 and 687 Residents
WH
Off 810 south of 687 School
WH
Off Rockybar Road Geographical/Church
WH
Off 663 east of 603 Historical
WH
7
(F5)
Wi lhoi t Place
1498 (F5)
Wi lhoit Farm
721 (F6)
Vintage Road
(A2)
Toco Hill Road
(A3)
Rising Sun Loop
(A3)
Horseshoe Road
(B1)
Gray Hollow Drive
(B1)
Matheny Drive
(B1)
Blackberry Road
(B3)
Anchorage Farm Road
(C1)
Fox Drive
(C1)
Arnold Drive
(C2)
Dave Page Road
(C3)
Taylor Mtn Drive
(C3)
Paradise Drive
(C3)
Pagebrook Farm
(C3)
Boxholly Lane
(C3)
Bundoran Drive
(C4)
Willow Road
(01)
Mize Drive
(01)
Yellow Mtn Drive
(01)
Rose Farm Drive
(02)
Safari Camp Drive
(02)
Gann Drive
(02)
Herring Drive
(03)
Rocksview Drive
(03)
Althea Drive
(03)
Malvern Farm Drive
Off 806 Historical
Off 806 Historical
Off 604 south of 605 Citizen
West of 29; north of S. Fork Hardware Common usage
River
Off 631 north of 712 Descriptive
Off 631 south of Walnut Branch Citizen request
Off 736 Historic reference to family
Off 736 near intersection with 635 Original landowner
Off 635 between 736 and 691
Citizen request
West of 29; north of 708
Farm name
Off 636 between 736 intersections
Family name
Off 636 east of 691
Fami l y name
Off 692 behind Page Store in Batesville Historic reference
Off 708 south of 637
existing subdv. name
Off 708 south of 637
Descriptive
At intersection of 708 and 710
Farm name
Off 637 between 682 and 635
Citizen request
Off 696 between 710 and 692
Farm name
Off 29 north of 745
Descriptive
Off 250 east of 690
Common usage
Off 691 south of 250
Farm name
Off 691 south of 250
Farm name
Off 250 west of [-64
Existing campground
Off 689 south of 250
Original farm owner
Off 824 north of 688
Fami ly name
[-64 frontage road off 637
Descriptive
Off 708 south of 738
Descriptive
Off 708 north of 637
Farm name
8
WH
WH
WH
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
(03) Turner Htn Road Off 250 east of 676 Citizen request SH
(04) Cold Spring Road Off 677 east of 637 Existing development name SH
(04) Orchard House Road Off 677 south of 250 Reference to historic house SH
(04) Windsor Farm Road Off 250 between Rockwood and Broomley Farm name SH
(04) Holiday Trails Lane End of 702 Existing ca"1> SH
(04) Ivy Creek Farm Rd Off 677 east of 637 Farm name SH
(E3) High View Drive Off 676 west of 678 Descriptive SH
(E3) Bailey's Retreat Off 676 west of 678 Citizen request SH
(E4) Walnutside Road Off 676 east of 614 Citizen request SH
(E4) Timbercreek Road Off 676 east of 614 Farm name SH
(E4) The Catlin Road Off 676 south of 614 Citizen request SH
(E4) Clay Hill Road Off 676 between 614 and 839 Citizen request SH
(E4) Garth House Lane Off 601 south of 658 Citizen request SH
(E4) Oakencroft Lane Off 601 south of 658 Citizen request SH
9
I /. C
'Y,' 'b . 't B rI (t-I./ -II
[>1':;", IJH2(J 0 ou..,: __ __~
f..r"d:l It-:li! ~k Qt).Q11[.. JO ()
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
<.
\,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
DATE: August 16, 1991
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
RE: Cable Television
Background:
On July 10, 1991, the County received a request from the City Attorney for
Charlottesville to participate in a survey that identifies our organization's
needs as they relate to cable television. The City is preparing to enter into
franchise discussions with Adelphia Cable Communications and has indicated a
willingness to consider the needs of all subscribers in negotiating a new
franchise. Adelphia presently serves approximately 10,200 county customers.
In order to fully understand the options available to the County in this area.
Mr. St. John requested a summary from Mr. James W. Hopper, Esquire, who has
demonstrated expertise in cable television regulations.
To summarize Mr. Hopper's response, the following points may be important:
(1) The County is not required to franchise its current provider because
of a grandfathering provision. At new operator, however, could not provide
cable service in the county without a franchise agreement. The County may
franchise if it so chooses and may offer this franchise on a non-exclusive
basis to as many operators as it deems to be appropriate.
(2) If the County chose to franchise, it could impose a franchise fee not
to exceed 5% of gross revenues collected in the County. This fee is
estimated to generate approximately $125,000 annually. It could regulate
quality of service, handling of customer complaints, technical standards,
provision of liability insurance, density of development required to be
served and other service related matters. Given the new amendments to the
1984 Cable Act, it appears doubtful that rates could be regulated to any
significant degree.
(3) Mr. Hopper indicates that with the exception of the alternatives
provided by broadcast television, satellite dishes, and video rentals, the
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
RE: Cable Television
August 16, 1991
Page 2
existing provider is not and will not be subject to free market pressures
and thus has a functional, unregulated monopoly over the provision of cable
television service to the residents of Albemarle County, even in the
absence of an existing franchise agreement.
Outside of Mr. Hopper's response, it may be helpful to note that one of the
concerns involved in franchising is the fundamental involvement of government
into the arena. It could clearly create the impression that the County
"controlled" the service and would certainly generate a stream of inquiries into
the County for requests to improve and/or extend service, customer complaints,
billing problems, rate regulation, etc.
Secondly, the introduction of "wireless" cable to the conununity will bring
additional competition to the marketplace. Although "wireless" cable has been
determined to be free from local government regulations in its entirety, it
clearly will provide an alternative to many cable subscribers and an opportunity
to receive service by many in our more rural areas. Charlottesville Quality
Cable intends to provide at least one station from each of the major networks as
well as many of the "cable" channels normally offered on a "wired" system.
Maximum channel capacity of this system will be 32 channels.
Issues:
(1) What involvement, if any, should the County have in providing feedback to the
City in their franchise negotiations?
(2) Is additional involvement by the County needed in regulating cable TV service
to county residents?
(3) Can cable TV provide the necessary technology to offer two-way data
transmission in lieu of dedicated phone lines at a cheaper cost to the County?
Reconunendation:
Instruct the staff to meet with the City's cable TV franchise conunittee to gather
the necessary information to consider whether it is in the County's best interest
to franchise cable TV and, if so, whether it should be done jointly or separately
from the City.
RWT,Jr/REH,II/dbm
91.114
..
P;":it,,'~d t,] ROard: !:I.:.:!:::.....=,J~--
~;~~d~ ";t:rn ~o, !l1.Q1L1.__41 J.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
;, ,i J < J' ~,
.. j .,-, . ..
i ;'~"
MEMORANDUM
it' fill
, .
~ '
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
I
~ , -I
Albemarle County Board of SupervisoI;".s. "d .', ,,'
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive~
,
--
August 19, 1991
Rental Fees - County Office Building
Background:
The Board has traditionally taken the position that public
facilities should be available to the public to the maximum extent
possible and at reasonable costs. Rental rates for usage of the
County Office Building have not been changed since 1982. Wi th
increased usage of the facilities, a review of the proposed fees
became warranted. Sunday usage of the County Office Building
increased 30% from 1989-90 to 1990-91 and shows no signs of slowing
down.
At the present, an organization can rent the auditorium or other
meeting room all day on the weekends for $11.34. The County must
pay either overtime or provide compensatory time for a custodian to
stay in the building for the entire period. Consequently, for a
six-hour event, our cost may be $90.00 with only an $11.34 fee
recovery. The attached fee schedule is designed to recover only
our costs for usage of the County Office Building by the classes or
groups indicated.
The schools have modified their rental policy to coincide with
general government except for some differences in custodial charges
and weekend usage. Schools are available to the public when
personnel will volunteer to work on weekends.
Recommendation:
(1) Implement the attached fee structure effective immediately for
anyone reserving rooms after the date of Board adoption.
(2) SchOOl/County groups shall be further defined as those having
a specific departmental budget designation in the County budget.
RWT,Jr/REH,II/dbm
91.118
..
H H H H
;:l Q) ;:l ;:l
~ 0 0, 0 0
:l Q) ..c::...-l UJ ..c:: ...-l ..c::...-l
tJ) 01 cO lf1 ;:l cO cO
H H'.., ...-l ...-l H ,.., .j< H ,..,
I cO Q)'O Q) ~0,Q)'OQ) Q)"C Q)
..c:: 0,0 01 0,0tJ'l 0,0 01
tJ .j.J H .j.J H .j.J H .j.J H
.;J lf1 UJ cO ~;:llf1UJcO lf1 UJ cO
cO 0 ...-l;:l..c:: Q)O...-l;:l..c:: ...-l;:l..c::
tJ) Z ~UtJ ~..c::~tJU ~tJtJ
rz:l
rz:l ...-l
r:.. cO
,..,
Q '0 ...-l ...-l
rz:l 0 UJ cO cO
tJ) .j.J ;:l'", ,..,
0 UJ ...-l'O '0
Po< ;:l 0,0 0
0 tJ .j.J .j.J
~ H UJ UJ
Po< H ;:l ;:l ;:l
;:l 0 tJ tJ
0 ..c::
..c:: H H
H ;:l ;:l
Q) Q) 0 0
,.., ~ o,..c:: ..c::
H Q) 0
r:.. 01 lf1 Q).j< Q)
H ...-l~~ ~~
I cO o Q) ~ 0 Q) o Q)
..c:: 001 ~O1 ~O1
tJ . H .j.J H H
~ lf1 cO ~ lf1 cO lf1 cO
~ 0 ...-l..c:: Q)...-l..c:: ...-l..c::
Z ~tJ ~~tJ ~tJ
Q)
01
H
cO
..c::
tJ
~
:l Q) ...-l
tJ) 01 cO
H ,..,
cO '0
..c:: 0
tJ Q) Q) Q) .j.J
.;J E E E UJ
ttl 0 cO cO cO ;:l
tJ) Z UJ UJ UJ tJ
Q)
..c::
.j.J
rz:l UJ
rz:l .j.J E ;:l
r:.. ..c:: ;:l ...-l
E 01 E 0,
E-< ;:l ...-l ,.., ,..,
~ E cO cO ~ H
,.., H'.., H cO ;:l
tJ) ~ ;:l'O.j.J E 0
rz:l cO o 0 UJ ..c::
P::: E ..c::.j.J H
Po< UJ I ;:l H
Q)H~ H ;:l Q) 0 Q)
O1;:lQ) Q)tJ~ O1..c:: 0,
HO.j.J 0, M H
cO ..c:: cO H cO Q) Q) 0
..c:: H ~;:l...-l ..c:: ~.j.J lf1
U Q) MO...-l tJ o cO ~
,.., ~ Q) ...c::~ H
H Q) ...-lOE ...-l ...-l I Q)
r:.. 01 cO ~ ,.., ...-l Q) cO .j.J ..0
H ,.., .j.J ~ ~~ ,.., ~..c::
flJ '001>-< o <lJ '0 M tJ'l ...-l
..c:: 00 Q) O1~ 0 ' ,.., ...-l
tJ .j.J .:> .j.J UJ I>-< Q) .j.J...-l cO cO
~ UJI'-O ~ ;:l flJ E UJ ...-l I>-< ..c::
~ 0 ;:l...-l Q) ...-l ..c:: ,.., ;:l~.j.J UJ
Z U~(!1) ~o,tJ.j.J U-UJ
E
;:l
,..,
I>-<
0
Q) - UJ .j.J
...-l ...-l UJ 0, ,..,
cO ..0 UJ ~ ;:l '0
~...-l cO 0, o 0 ;:l
o cO .j.J ;:l ,.., I>-< '"
,.,-I I>-< UJ ,.., 0 .j.J01 UJ
.j.J ;:l ~ H H cO ~ Q)
cO .j.J 0 cO 01 N Q) 0 ..c::
tJ ...-l ,.., ..c:: ,.., .j.J ,.., .j.J
;:l;:l.j.J tJ UJ ~ cO .j.J
'0 tJ cO flJ :> III 4-<
Q) N - ~ UJ 01'''' N 0
'0 ,.., tJ III ~ I>-< I>-< ,..,
- ~ ~ ,.., I>-< 0 o 0, ~ Q)
UJ III cO :> Q)'", III 01
Q) 01 ,..,.j.J .j.J O1H 01 cO
:>. ,.., ...-l I>-< tJ Q) cO ~ 0 I>-< UJ
.j.J tJ cO 0 :> N ,.., 0 ;:l
~ ~ ~ ,.., ..><: Ul
:z: ;:l Q) 0 H ...-lH~ III Q) UJ H
0 0 01'''' 0 III 0 cO E UJ ;:l 0
H U cO.j.J tJ 01 UJ 0 4-<
E-< --- III UJ ,..,...-l I>-< .j.J Q) ,..,
6 ...-l H ..c:: Q) 0, .j.J III 0 ,.., ~ 01 .j.J
0 H .j.J I>-< ;:l ,.., ,.., 4-< ,.., ,.., ~
H 0 H ;:l tJ 0 ...-ltJ'O o UJ ...-l Q)
r:.. ..c:: 0 Q) H o 0 ~ I>-< ;:l Q) ~
H tJ '0 >< I>-< 01 p.. UJ III p....o ~ .j<
tJ) UJ ~
tJ) cO
:s H
H H H >-
U H H H H H >-
....
'b . d' B d' ~-' -q )
');,",. ,"'0 to oar lP
,_, t )~j \ ~I,."" .
~.genda Item No. q 1- () f 1/ j 17?>
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
-
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
of Supervisors ft
,.---
County Executive /
September 5, 1991
RE: FY 1992-93 Preliminary CIP Requests and Revenues
Attached for your review prior to the CIP work sessions in
November is a summary of the requested capital projects for
FY 92/93 - FY 96/97 and a preliminary projection of available
revenues to fund those projects. Several major road project
requests, i.e., Meadowcreek Parkway, Timberwood Parkway and the
Avon Street/Route 20 connector road, have already been taken out
of these requested amounts.
Keeping in mind that these are requested projects, not final
projects prioritized by the Planning Commission or recommended by
the County Executive's Office, the projected revenue shortfall
for the FY 92-93 projects, assuming they are all funded, is
approximately 2.6 million. The cumulative shortfall over the
five-year CIP period is approximately $10 million. These revenue
projections do not include the meals tax, which would add
$1.4 million annually for a cumulative total of approximately
$7 million for the five year plan.
If you should have any questions prior to the meeting,
please feel free to contact me.
RWT,Jr/RWW/bat
91-104
Attachments
J!" "
~,
<Xl .... '<t 8 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .... N S".'"M'.
C\I M C\I 0 0 0 M .~...~.
...J '<to CD q 10 0 M ,.... <<!. ...J ,.... 0 <<!. <Xl
g N N 10 u; a) <.D r-: as ~ ~ N c5 C\I ~
<Xl CD ~ M <Xl .... M 10 0 <Xl
10 ~ ,.... CD '<to CD .... 10 q ~ '<t .~...~.
I- <.D N c? c? N m N 10 ,.... m
M C\I C\I :y;..<::::"....
~:::~
.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 O'~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .~...~.
en 0 q 0 ~ 0 0 10 en 0 0 q q
I I
CD c5 10 c5 <0 <.D c5 N CD c5 c5 10 10 {i)8
en CD M 10 C\I '<t .... en 0 0 M M
en en C\I CD ,.... en C\I q ~ ,.... .~..(");
,.... <.D as ,.... CD as a
:~:'
:_~:
CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 CD 0 0 0 0 $a-
en 0 0 0 0 0 0 en en en 0 0 0 0 &ttQ
I ~ 0 0 0 0 10 "!. C\I I q 0 q q
10 ,.... <.D c5 c5 r-: N M as 10 10 c5 CD c;; t;;;ti~
en C\I M ~ 0 10 '<t M en 10 0 M ~>~
en '": .... 10 ,.... ,.... en en C\I q .... ~
N .'","","",-:-:'--"-!O!
.0
,--- ...-.:
~
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 10 0 0 0 0 i'~
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
en .... '0 0 0 0 ,.... CD '<t en 0 0 q 0 "'t...~
I I
'<t r-: a) c5 r-: c5 10 as r-: '<t ~ c5 en ri W~
en en C\I 0 <0 '<t ,.... 0 en M 0 C\I '<t
en C\I M C\I ,.... 10 ,.... en q M <<!. '<t(")
N SS
~ 0 0 en 0 0 0 0 0 en '<t en 0 0 en 0'$
10 Ie .... 0 0 0 0 ~ c;; en C\I 0 10 .... ~>~
I C\I CD 0 0 '<t 0 I <Xl 0 ..... 10
M ~ <.D i N m ~ c5 r-: as M r-: c5 ~
en en CD ~>....
en M .... en M '<t 0 en M 0 .... 0 ....J:S
... M M ~ CD ,.... M .... C\I CD q t':!.
~ N c5 C\I ~ <.DaS
~':'~
M <Xl .... 0 0 0 0 CD C\l .~>:~
10 CD M 10 0 .... ~...~
en C\I <Xl ~ 0 0 0 0 0 CD en 10 0 <Xl '<t
I en ~ 0 0 en 0 '<t '<t I t':!. 0 ~ "!.
C\I r-: 10 c5 u; c5 as c5 c5 as C\I 10 c5 10 ,.... N;"j'ii;;',
en en
en 0 0 <Xl .... ,.... C\I 10 10 0 en '<t 0 0 10 ~~
CD ~ <Xl 10 M ,.... '<t ~ M ,.... q ~ CD
,.... <.D ,.... ri $$%$
,.... ,....
I- <Xl .... ~ 0 0 0 ~ ,.... '<t
Z C\l en 0 0 0 '<t M
W '<to ~ q M 0 M ,.... '<t
a: N <0 10 m m <.D r-: as as
a: CD CD M <Xl .... M M
10 0 ,.... M CD "<l:. CD C\I
0 <.D N ri ri N c5
() C\I M ....
a: 0 0 0 10 0 0 ~ 0 en
0 0 10 <Xl N 0 10 M
en ..... <<!. 0 .... "<l:. ....
a: m 10 c;; ri c5 N 10 as
0- CD 10 C\I 0 M 0 ....
<Xl en '<t ~ en 0 "<l:.
N ,.... ~ C\i
,....
~ <Xl .... en 0 0 0 <Xl M
C\I <Xl 0 0 0 0 <Xl W 10
Z t':!. M M 0 0 M M M
0 ,.... as <.D r-: m <.D c5 ri N C/J
0 en <Xl CD ~ M <Xl CD ~ 0
M .... 10 CD ,.... '<t W
() r-: N ciS ri 10 ~ c5
C/J C\I M <Xl ::J
t; Z
...J b CD .... en c;; 0 0 .... ,.... w
w g M <Xl 0 0 0 <Xl W 10 > c..i
'<to M M ,.... 0 M '<t ....
""") W as <.D u; as <.D N ri W Q)
-, 10 10
0 I- 0 10 M en .... M <Xl 0 '<t M c: 0>
<Xl <Xl 10 '<t M CD .... 0 10
c: a: <.D N <.D ai r-: ~ as CJ
0- Q. c
Q. ,.... C\I '<t 0 cu
C U Cii
.J::J
W W ..;;J "0
....J c
I- ..J <( .2
C/J en co rJ) .......~
W I- Z 5 Vi
::J a: 0 ~ .........0 (I)
0 ~ a: :I: Q;
0 0 z < W cn c
u.
W () 0 ~ en W <iii
c: c ~ a: i= en z > ::10 i-
0 W
Z 0- c( () c( en ~ i'.Effi Q; c;;
u. c( u. en W U. a: a: c Q. .....
0 z z en a: ~ 0 0 I- ~ ~[ij 0 U)
c( () z 0. 0
0 en c( 0 0 c 0 <: .....
>- ~ W a: 0 W >- Z oW '0 en
a: F-< en u. F-< 0
c: z 0 55 W f2 c: W 0 C 0 :I:W (I)
a: z c a: u. en>
< ~ 0 () > en c( z en < ...J W E-< wi=' Cii ~
:E ~ en W ...J c( ~ :E (!) c( ~ =>/:5 <Il 3
W ~ a: ..J W Z Cl <Il
:E z a: W en i= :E i= a: Z ffio (I) c?
() W :I: c( () ~ ::i W a: ~ "0 en
::J ::2 0 a: a: ::J en z a: aj~ :J I
C C a: S2 CD ~ c( i= x W 0 U C\I
C/J C/J en
c( W u: :I: :J ::2 0- 0 0 W (!) CD 0 J82. c 0-
U
Edward H Bain. Jr
Samu~l Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 979~1281
Charlotte Y Humph",
,JdCI<. JOUl!11
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F Perkllls
Whit", Hall
F. R _ (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T Way
Scottsvllle
September 13, 1991
Jefferson Area United Transportation
ATTN: Ms. Linda Wilson
1138 East High Street
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Wilson:
The Board of Supervisors at their meeting September 11, 1991,
appointed Roxanne White as Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.'s designee to
the JAUNT Board. Ms. White's term expires on September 30, 1994.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
.~?~
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC
LEN:bwh
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Roxanne White
Lester A. Wilson, III,
Commonwealth's Attorney
Edward H Bam, Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 979~1281
September 13, 1991
Charlott{! Y Humphris
,LKk Jouett
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F. Perkms
Whit\:' Hall
F R _ (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T Way
Scott5vdle
Mr. Montie Pace
Route 4 Box 200
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Pace:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 11,
1991, you were reappointed to the Land Use Classification Appeals
Board with said term to expire on September 1, 1993.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to
continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
F. R. Bowie
Chairman
FRB:bwh
cc: Melvin Breeden
Lester A. Wilson, III,
Commonwealth's Attorney
Edward H Baln. Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 979~ 1281
September 13, 1991
Charlotte Y Humphns
.Jacl-. Jouetl
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F Perkins
White Hall
F R (Rick) Bowie
Ri.....anna
Peter T Way
Scollsville
Mr. Dan M. Maupin
Route 2
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Maupin:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 11,
1991, you were reappointed to the Land Use Classification Appeals
Board with said term to expire on September 1, 1993.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to
continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
F. R. Bowie
Chairman
FRB:bwh
cc: Melvin Breeden
Lester A. Wilson, III,
Commonwealth's Attorney
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 979~1281
Charlotte Y Humph"s
. Jack Jvuell
, Walter F Petkms
" While t1a~
Edward H. Barn. Jr
Samuel Miller
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scollsville
September 13, 1991
Mr. Samuel Page
Crossroads
North Garden, VA 22959
Dear Mr. Page:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on September 11,
1991, you were reappointed to the Land Use" Classification Appeals
Board with said term to expire on September 1, 1993.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity
to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to
continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
F. R. Bowie
Chairman
FRB:bwh
cc: Melvin Breeden
Lester A. Wilson, III,
Commonwealth's Attorney
DATE
"S~/Jk/YLJ?!,- /1 J /99/
,
AGENDA ITEM NO.
9/ ()'l//. Y7 /
AGENDA ITEM NAME
[: I.J kt1t{ /t (SA
'S'" f"I/) ,"" /J f I? C \
. '-- v- '-'<_ ./'+' l_ LJ
DEFERRED UNTIL
."1; I /
t') ,-'("I" tj
,..I
vcl q,
Form. 3
7/25/86
GIUSEPPE M. CA V ALCA
MARKETING CONSULT ANT
203 BENNtNGTON ROAD
CHARLOTTESVtLLE. VtRGtNtA 22901
TELEPHONE (804) 296-6554
September 3, 1991
Mr. Frederick R. Bowie
Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Dear Mr. Bowie:
The Hon. Sergio Pezzati, president of the Philip Mazzei Asso-
ciation and former mayor of Poggio a Caiano, Charlottesville's
twin city in Italy, will lead a group of ten Italians in a visit
to Charlottesville and Albemarle County on September 5-7.
On Friday, September 6, he would welcome the opportunity of
meeting with you or a member of your administration you may
designate, to discuss further the possibility of holding next
summer the fourth exchange of high school students from the
two communities which had to be postponed this year because
of the Gulf war.
Dr. Pezzati apologizes for the very short notice: any time on
Friday would be suitable for him, and your favorable response
would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Q\~.
Giuseppe M. Cavalca
MOTION: Mr. Bain
SECOND: Mrs. Humphris
MEETING DATE: September 11, 1991
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has
convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1
requires a certification by the
Supervisors that such executive
conformity with Virginia law;
of the Code of Virginia
Albemarle County Board of
meeting was conducted in
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.
VOTE:
AYES:
Messrs. Bain, Bowie, Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris,
Mr. Perkins and Mr. Way.
NAYS: None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE:
ABSENT DURING MEETING:
11\("~
l/U ~.u.jlt(,
Deputy Clerk, Albemarle County
Board of Supervis s
,
,I
i
I
I
I
DATE
(Sf/)/e.rVlIJe/L I/, lelv /
,
AGENDA ITEM NO.
Qf
I I '
~7//. ~7.:.j
AGENDA ITEM NAME
(/'.
( ", " I
_/'~ _- L-C
b( /- .. 1"
j 1;,.4 .J' -'--....--
'......." .....t..
DEFERRED UNTIL
" '5 e i J k I 7'1. /1 lA,,, j.t:-;
,
Form. 3
7/25/86
...... ,--""
.
,~.,I
Edward H. Bam, Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229014596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 979~1281
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Charlotte Y Humphris
.Jack Jouett
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F. Perkms
While Hall
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
ScotlsviJle
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
September 18, 1991
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Board Actions of September 11, 1991
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting held on September 11,
1991, the Board had a list of concerns regarding solid waste that
it asked the staff to address sometime in the future.
LEN:ec
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
Robert Brandenburger
-
1. The household voluntary curbside recycling pilot program does not include
haulers collection cost, how is that to be addressed if the County really
wants the program to work? How much are the people willing to pay directly
to have the recycling work? How important is it to the County to either
directly or indirectly subsidize some of the costs to the people to
encourage those people to recycle? If the County does not subsidize, will
the program fall flat? What does the County ultimately look at doing to
make the program work?
2. Does the County wait until educational efforts are complete before beginn-
ing a recycling program?
3. What does the County ultimately do for the whole solid waste situation? Do
we continue with landfills or do we look at a waste-to-energy scenario?
4. Prepare a comparison of the costs (currently estimated at $13.5 million) to
close the Keene Landfill and part of the Ivy Landfill against the costs of
a new landfill, including cost of acquisition, monitoring, cell, etc., vs.
waste-to-energy situation.
5. What happens to the landfill, future costs, operations, etc., if the County
meets the 25 percent mandate? What happens to those costs if the County
goes to 40 percent? How will the County get beyond the 25 percent mandate?
What is the dollar benefit to anything beyond the state mandate? Can the
County meet the 25 percent mandate without doing anything additional?
6. Prepare a clear analysis on all scenarios in chart form listing pros, cons,
costs, etc.
~,
'/) .... - ... '.
f',,, '-~ ~- 'v--""-"
-\'('-
,
""',\'1\\,,\\
COMING FULL CIRCLE
RECYCLING: WASTE MANAGEMENT OR WASTE DISPOSAL?
All to often waste management programs are evaluated
only by one element.
A recycling program has many steps in coming full
circle,
1. First you must have a good education program.
2. The ability to collect items or materials for
recycling.
3. You must be able to process these items to meet
the stanards of end user markets.
4. One of the most imporant steps in coming full
circle is a good market demand.
5. At this step, end users must be able to reproduce
a product from this marterial.
1. EDUCATION
Education may be.
A. School programs
B. T.V, Radio, Newspaper Ads
C. Direct l~iling to all residents
D. Waste haulers for homes that have a curb side
collection service.
Page - 1
..)
,- ,c"-.
"
2. COLLECTION
Collection may have many forms. .
A. UNMANNED DROP-OFF CENTERS
Unmanned drop off centers may have high risk for
contaminations and this will limit the ability to
market this material.
B. MANNED DROP-OFF CENTERS
Manned drop off centers will reduce the risk of
contamination, but may only serve a small
percentage of the population.
This may be a
starting program.
3. CURBSIDE COLLECTION
A. HOME OWNER SORT
Home owner sort. (Source separated) The resi'dent
will need separate containers for each item.
Waste collection companies will need special
recycling trucks.
There is a high risk for contamination.'
Two truck trips to each house. (Waste and
Recycling collection.
Extra trips to the curb by route truck driver.
When one compartment of the truck is full you
must stop and off load, etc.
B. CURB SORT
Page - 2
.,
Curb sort by the route truck driver will lower the
risk of comtamination and will reduce the number
of bins required too one.
There is still a need for the special recycling
truck.
Homeowners will need a bigger recycling container.
Recycling route truck driver will spend much more
time at each stop, sorting materials and returning
the container to the home.
The truck will need to be off load when one
compartment becomes full even though the truck may
be only half full.
C. BAGGED CO-MINGLED COLLECTION
Bagged co-mingled collection will elimate the need
for recycling containers and special trucks. This
will reduce by 50% the number of trips to the curb
by route men. CA great labor savings).
A bag system would also facilitate recycling for
many businesses, dorms, offices and rural
Albemarle County res1"dents.
Waste haulers working in the rural area may be
able to co-collect or use a much less expensive,
truck Cused pick-up).
A bagged collection system will give you the
f lexi bi 1 i ty to add or e 1 ima te i terns to meet 'the
changing markets.
Page - 3
~
.v/
Collection cost is the largest portion of any
recycling program.
4. PROCESSING M.R.F. (MURF)
~-
_...._~-_.-.......
A. The most common mistake made in evaluating the
benefits of a l1RF is to look at processing cost
,alone. I The real saving associated with a MRF
are on the collection end, by far the largest
cost component of recycling.
------..
B. Without the ability for processing to meet
market standard all we have is a secondary
market,
This may mean no money value, or even
cost associated with secondary markets.
5. HOW MANY TIMES?
A, When the material has been recycled and new
products come back into the waste stream, can
they be recycled again?
What disposal method will
.
we use at this time,
Landfill or Waste-to-Energy?
6. COST
A. The DIRECT cost to the residents of Albemarle
County may determind the success or failure 'of
proper landfill disposal and recycling program.
Page - 4
.,
An indirect cost may encourage proper disposal
and recycling by the citizens of our county.
Page - 5
j
.i-~, _..
1\.,;)
, (]=J,L..::cCf
'\Vl
\ !
.~ l
, f
: ~
, "
L.-~
Edward H Bain, ,Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 2290 1 ~4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jac~. .Jouett
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F Perkllls
While Hall
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T Way
Scottsvill...
TO: Cliff Haury, Chairman
Albemarle County School Board
FROM: F. R. Bowie, Chairman~
DATE: August 26, 1991
SUBJECT: Joint Meetings
At our last meeting, the Board discussed your request to meet
on alternate months at 5:00 p.m. on Mondays. We feel it would be
most difficult for us to get a quorum at that particular time; in
fact in the past four years when the Boards have decided to meet on
a regular basis, the only times we have consistently had quorums of
both Boards is on the Wednesday day meeting. We can discuss this
further at our joint meeting on September 11, at 3:00 p.m., if you
choose.
As of this time, we have three agenda items, two of which are
carried forward from the proposed August meeting:
1. Report on Murray High School. The Board requests a
briefing on how the evaluation process will take place,
what factors will be considered, etc.
2. The School's Capital Improvement Program. I will ask Bob
Tucker, County Executive, to present a briefing on
funding capabilities as they appear at this time.
3. Report on School openings/enrollment for the 1991-92
school year.
Should the school Board have any additional items they want to
address, I suggest the County Executive and School Superintendent
coordinate.
FRB:ec
cc: Bob Tucker
Members, Board of Supervisors
('
.,
,
I
I
{
, ," . ,'/ (.
DI~.tr:illJ~ed to Baard:. __1._:~__R_
, (.1/ UIO/A ,,~/,_'
,.....'n"j 1''''''1 No I)! --r. TI.V )
.....-oJ,...... "...... ,. .~.~."'-+_~
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
',i:" \ :',\\~ '
DATE:
September 6, 1991
,~\ ,""
,:.). p ::,.. .', " ~~
!
,I
/
,,'
6 1991
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
Robert W. paskel ~0~
Division Superintendent
1 .~:~~;; \~r~"cr'''l,~\~_~~': _~._'
TO:
~.. S, 'jP E F~ \/ ; '",
RE:
Booklet on Murray High School
The enclosed booklet, Murray High School,: A School of
Choice, may be useful in preparing for the discussion on Murray
High School at the joint meeting of the Board of Supervisors and
the School Board on September 11, 1991. The booklet address
many of the issues raised over recent months concerning the
expectations and structure of the alternative education program
in Albemarle County. Additional revisions have been made to
teacher handbook, and administrative procedures for the 1991-92.
We look forward to discussing the goals for this program,
the progress and problems, and the ongoing evaluation activities
with members of both boards.
RWP/bmc
Enclosure
.
.
It
MURRAY HIGH SCHOOL
OUTCOMES:
· Academic learning
· Improvement in Grades
· Improvement in student attendance as compared to
previous school
· Problem solving skills
· High School Graduation in compliance with Virginia
Standards of Learning
· Improved communication skills
· Decision-making skills
· Entrance into work force and/or further education
· Sense of civic responsibility
,. . ~ - ,
t.... ':,' ._...- ~ ,. ii": ~~.~-...~... /, !
f~~:/'~~ . '
Attachment #1
f
GOAL #1:
Strategy:
GOAL #2:
Strategy:
GOAL #3:
Strategy:
GOAL #4:
Strategy:
GOAL#S:
Strategy:
GOAL #6:
Strategy:
GOAL #7:
Strategy:
Attachment #2
GOALSANDSTRATEGffiS
EQB.
MURRA Y HIGH SCHOOL
1991-92 School Year
E,,; .:bate strengths and weaknesses of the academic program.
Use multiple assessment strategies which may include:
PSATs, the Nelson-Denny, the Key Math Test and portfolios.
Teach acceptable replacement behavior for inappropriate
behavior.
Dedicate one faculty meeting a week to discuss behavior
problems to allow for better follow-up.
Improve student attendance.
· Review weekly attendance reports to identify patterns
(ie - classes where attendance is low).
· Establish parent contact every time a student is absent.
Provide opportunity for postive student involvement in the
community .
Integrate the PULSAR project into the Murray curriculum.
The PULSAR project is a cooperative effort on the part of
Murray High School, the Albemarle County Police Dept. and
several area social resource agencies to increase mutual
understanding and communication between our students
and their community.
Develop in new staff and students a sense of community.
· Staff retreat to Camp Albemarle (PULSAR grant) in August.
· Whole school retreat to Camp Blue Ridge (PULSAR grant) in
October.
Use a client feedback system to improve, monitor, and adjust
program effectiveness. ,
Revise surveys which are used to gather. feedback from
students, parents, educators, and employers.
Better meet the needs of students planning to pursue
post-secondary education.
· Expand the lllRE/Higher Education program (please see
attached brochure) to include a Higher Education
component. ,
· Work with PVCC to allow select seniors to enroll in classes
not available at Murray High School.
., c..
-;:l
O.
o~
=0
U.J
~.J
=0
o~
='-J
-Eo-
><
<;:l
~Q
~<
;:l~
~c
,g
C'\
-
U
Q
=
'C;;
u
e
=
.S
C6
Q
:::I
"0
U
..
U
.;:::
t:
.a
..
Q
=
Co)
E
>.
Q
Q.
E
Co)
~
8
-
"0
=
=
C'\
ClCl
C'\
-
....
Q
~
<=
Co)
>.
.s
E
e
....
~
Co)
C6
:::I
"0
CIS
..
C4
'8
.;:::
Q
'"
.;:::
.~
-
-
>.
t:
~
~
U
"0
:::I
Cj
=
"0
Co)
Q
=
Co)
'C
Co)
Q.,
loC
Co)
U
>
<=
.;:::
~
Co)
C6
:::I
"0
e
C4
~
't)
'"
-
eo.
.- C4
==
>.'=
<= <=
t:: :::I
:::I~
:E~
.3
~
F
;
~
u u
u CJ
> >
~ ~
u _
> =
'C ::
Q :
(fI ::
::: ;;;
= u
c::
,~ (fI
'oJ -=
~ ~ ~
'" < u
8
C4
=
:0
e
e-
Co)
C4
"0
2
Co)
:::I
S
..
...
u
=
~
=
e
~
:c
u
~
- tJ ~
'C; 0 :J
;gs:~~
(fI
t:
<=
g.
>. ~
E ..(
<... u
u u u :is
~~~~~
e
o
,:;
.c
'C
;;;
Q
. Co)
<= c;
"0 ~
= u
.s "0 e e
] ~ a a
>.O~:5!
~!e5a
u
C4
~
8
(fI e
u (fI =
C6 g U
~ .~ ~
g ~ ~ ~
.2 > ~
~ ~ cj
~-
...
C4
~
-
:;
"0
<
tJ
~ B
~ s:
8
e
=
e
'~
o
=
=
o c:
~ "i
loC e
~ 0
duacnment #i)
u
C4
~
C
CJ
~
::
<
sa
<n
-;-
E
::
=
I
~
<n
~ 0
-a ~
~ ~
__;_u ~ ;l
1: 1;
'" ~ ~
~
E
<=
a.
100
:~ -:
- .~
Co ~ C.
o =
~~..?
u u
~ ~
~ ~
u
C4
~
<8 ?3 a
~ > ~ a
-= ~ ~ ~
:::ICO...'oJ ~
uE~'=~ 'oJ<
~EU=CIS(fI=O
8<8c;.s'~~ ~ <<i
~'E ~~ ~~ ~.9
~'>:::I.9 EC::-a~!i
~g", C6~ ~"O~ 2
=!J.s ~ :;s-g'a ~
Q ~ CIS = 0 = u 0
....l .. :s .5 CI] Z Q: l::::: C,)
o ~
_ r-1 rI' ~ I.", r- ~ N ;r N
- C\J Ni -r L,' ~ "" ."1:) e- 9 .;- .; - - -i" ~ ~ ~ ":tj ~ ~
'...a.~~.'~1.~-.~~~-. 1
~~ ~]j1~~~~]~ ~~j ~iJ
1il1JJ~~jJ)j&~~~~~~~~m~
~ ~ \JJ \~ v J V1 t ~ VJ .
~
o 0 0 C'\ 0 0 Q C'\ 0 0 0 C'\ 0 C'\ 0 C'\ 0 ~ 0 0 C'\
C'\ C'\ C'\ ClCl C'\ C'\ C'\ ClCl C'\ C'\ C'\ = C'\ ClCl C'\ ClCl ~ = C'\ C'\ ClCl
C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ C'\ ~ ~ C'\ C'\ C'\
.... ... ... .... -- ..... .... ..... ... ........ .... ...-.0 pIIOIl ....
~
Q
C
U
'C
u
Co
>C
,0
~
.~
-=
g
<ii
.c
c
....,
=
.2
c;
g
'0
::J
::J
::::::
.-
. -
-
~
E
oS
.c
c
....,
-
u
c
'a
~
C
CI!
-=
~
;;;
..
r
Student #: 1
Student #: 2
Student #: 3
Student #: 4
Student #: 5
Student #: 6
Student #: 7
Student #: 8
Student #: 9
Student #: 10
Student #: 11
Student #: 12
Student #: 13
Student #: 14
Student #: 15
Student #: 16
Student #: 17
Student #: 18
Student #: 19
Student #: 20
Student #: 21
Student #: 22
MURRAY HIGH SCHOOL
INACTIVE STUDENT LIST
1990-1991
moved out of state
dropped OL!t - family problems
transfereo ro AHS
overage - previous drop out -
AHS - 20 yrs old - 2 credits
moved to Fairfax Co.
moved to Orange Co.
expelled
dropped out - unmotivated
teen mother - no child care
overage - 18 yrs old - 4 credits
expelled
dropped out - unmotivated
droppOd out - financial reasons
'dropped out - financial reasons -
lived independently
pregnancy
moved out of state
moved to Ruvanna Co.
overage - 19 yrs old - 8 credits
moved to the city
pregnancy
pregnancy
teen mother
Total number of drop outs:
teen mother. pregnancy
financial
family problems
unmotivated
overage
Tctcl number moved:
Total number expelled:
13
5
2
1
2
3
7
2
<'
AHS
WAHS
MURRAY
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FY 1991-92 COST PER PUPIL
(INSTRUCTION & PROFESSIONAL STAFF)
PROJECTED
ENROLLMENT
INSTRUCTIONAL
COSTS
10-Sep-91
PER
PUPIL
$397.18
$436.12
$647.10
AHS
WAHS
MURRAY
1598
$634,695
985
$429,583
80
$51,768
PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL
STAFF RATIO * SALARIES
110.00
14.95
$4,057,861
64.50
15.67
$2,481,826
5.50
12.36
$202,266
. BASED ON ACTUAL ENROLLMENT
PER
PUPIL *
$2,466.78
$2,454.82
$2,974.50
Attachment #10
.
MURRAY HIGH SCHOOL
DISCIPLINE REFERRAL RECORD
1990-91
FIGHTING 7 3%
HORSE PLAYING 62 22%
NON P ARTlCIP A TION t5} 25%
SMOKING VIOLATION 2 1%
INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/LANGUAGE ~ 14%
WALKED OUT OF CLASS 6 2%
CONFUCT W / ANOTHER STUDENT 8 3%
CONFUCT W / TEACHER 13 4%
DISRUPTING CLASS 23 8%
PERSONAL PROBLEMS 38 14%
MISCELlANEOUS 11 4%
--
~-
---
~
,.,.r
"
"
'-f
,J
T'""
en
en
T'""
T'""
T'""
a:
w
OJ
~
W
~
c..
w
CJ)
LL
o
CJ)
<(
~
Z
W
~
-l
-l
o
a:
z
w
"
~J
u <(I
w 1-'
-, 0'
oI-l
a:
a..
co to co a> C\l 10 10 to C\l .... C\l '<t 0 <XlI C\I
M '<t '<t C\I CO ~ C\I 0 0 CO 10 .... M 101 m
'<t M 10 M to .... 10 C\I C\l ,.... 10 C\I '<t ,....llO..
10
<Xl ,.... '<t MI to
~ ffi (0 :2! M
N
CO 10 01 M
a> CO <XlI to
lOa> to
. N
UJI
01
<C
cd
01
>1
;::1
Z'
UJI
~i
::ll
o
a:1
Zi
UJI
-11
<(1
~'
d
1-1
o 10 C\I <Xl .... .... 0 0 '<t M '<t 0 m 01 a>
NN .............. ....... C\J
LL
...J
W
C/)
a:,
:51
al
~I
~I
::1
I
~I
a>1
J
~ ~ ~ N ~ m g m ~ ~ g ~ g ~! g
'<t C\I '<t M 10 to '<t C\I ,.... ,.... '<t C\I M ,....1 0
ll'i
....1
I
<D
10
to 0 a> C\I C\I ~ C\I C\I C\I ~ to 0 10 C\l1 0
<D 10 .... 10 <Xl a> CO 10 C\I M .... '<t '<t MI 0
CO
'<t'
I
M1
J
I
10 M ~ ~ 10 a> CO 0 '<t '<t 10 C\I to COI ~
CO '<t .... to a> co .... ~ M M CO '<t '<t C\l1 M
<Xl
C\I a> 10 M '<t 10 '<t a> ,.... C\I to a> '<t C\l1 10
to M to '<t a> '<t .... 10 '<t M a> M 10 MI r--
<Xl
to C\I M C\I '<t 10 M to <Xl a> 0 a> to 01 M
.... '<t co 10 C\I 0 co M C\I C\I co '<t to M i CO
,.... ... CO
a> ~ .... 0 co 10 a> ~ <Xl 0 m 0 .... C\l1 to
to ~ co to co M to M C\I M <Xl 10 .... C\l1....
,.... CO
~I
CO ,.... en M C\I '<t '<t ,.... M M .... 10 C\I MI 10
10 '<t .... 10 0 m to '<t CO') CO') <D '<t .... MI ,....
,.... CO
CI)
~
Cl lU ~o
o -.l
o~ 0:::>- lU~l-~
S:-.l CllU"'( ::lCii~O
Cl)3; W5~O:: 3;000
:::>CI) I- ~l.UO::-.lCl)o::o..O:::>-
Cl~ ~ffi>-s:~~tlU:>-~lU
(50~OlU::lo: 'ClO~~O(.)
O::O::"'(O::~O~~lU(')~~~~
CXlCXl(.)(.)""J:<::>.O::CI)CI)CI);:..>:
'<t 0 .... ....1 <Xl
C\lM,....MO
m to 10 01 0
o 10 <Xl ml '<t
'<t <D 10 '<ti,....
N
~ ~ ro ~I ~
,.... C\J ...... .......i to
~ en .... MI 0
'<t C\I ,.... co!....
....... (\J C\J ......i,......
C\I '<t ,.... co I 10
10 0 0 tOl C\I
.,.... C\J C\I ,.....1 f'..
:>-:>-I-~
lUlUl-~
~~~-.l
~~~~
CO') M 01 to
....M 0
~ ~ ?6i M
10m <D
" N
,.... co '<tl M
r--...""""'-IO
CO')C\1 to
C\I .... <XlI....
'<t ~ C\ll <Xl
CO')C\I 10
C\I co ....1....
en CO') ,....1 '<t
CO') C\I to
a> to m' '<t
....0 m
'<tM ....
lU
~~:>-
~ffi"'(
lU!--:O::
CXlCl)O:
-.l~:::>
~;:..~
r::
10
o
M 0) '<t
'<t M
M M
,....
10
<Xl
0)"
M
o
to
....
<Xl
10
....
'<t
to
'<t
en
....
10
'<t
<D
o
....
....
10
C\I
....
o
o
<Xl
M
co
10
....
co
M
co
co
to
....
co
10
~
<Xl
C\l
M
"!.
o
,....
co
'?
o
o
to
M
to
o
<D
m
,....
.
o
to
to
M
,....
.
....
0)
....
'?
'<t
....
<D
en
~
'<t
<D
....
<D
o
....
....
10
"'i
M
C\I
<Xl
M
~
to
to
<Xl
10
'?
M
o
a>
co
~
o
<Xl
<Xl
M
lO
C\I
a>
m
"'i
'<t
<D
0)
a>
'<t
,....
.
LI.J
Cl
~
C:>
:>-
CXl
Cl
~
frl
a
0:
0..
lU
(.)
~
~
0::
$
c;;
6.
tl)
CJ?
,....
,....
<<
9/11/91
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOLS
FY 1991-92 ENROLLMENT
DAY 1 DAY 3 DAYS Day 7
BROADUS WOOD 413 415 416 416
BROWNSVILLE 277 280 281 281
CALE 476 483 486 486
CROZET 328 328 329 329
GREER 582 588 601 602
HOLL YM EAD 674 675 676 676
MERIWETHER LEWIS 446 450 450 450
VIRGINIA L. MURRAY 261 260 259 259
RED HILL 189 188 188 190
SCOTTSVILLE 186 189 192 192
STONE ROBINSON 495 501 507 507
STONY POINT 263 266 265 265
WOODBROOK 372 380 379 379
YANCEY 172 175 177 177
BURLEY 442 444 434 433
HENLEY 674 684 685 686
JOUETT 596 601 601 602
WALTON 531 527 528 527
ALBEMARLE 1,584 1,632 1,645 1,657
WESTERN 984 1,010 1,011 1,012
MURRAY HIGH 66 65 68 68
TOTAt..' ...... -..' ......... . ............. . ............ .
......... . J(),1~1 ............ . ::1q~'~4
..... -.... 1017a
... . HM~nH ::...:.:."....,~.,:,,:..:
CHANGE FROM DAY 1 130 167 183
9/11/91
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOLS
FY199~91ENROLLMENT
DAY 1 DAY 3 DAYS DAY 7 DAY 9 SEPT. 30 MAR. 31
BROADUS WOOD 420 421 419 419 419 418 418
BROWNSVILLE 316 319 319 319 318 323 317
CALE 493 500 505 507 509 516 506
CROZET 321 320 321 321 321 320 313
GREER 619 640 654 654 655 664 616
HOlL YM EAD 650 658 659 657 657 660 670
MERIWETHER LEWIS 667 673 675 675 674 676 681
RED HILL 190 193 193 193 193 193 192
SCOTTSVILLE 171 173 173 172 172 177 177
STONE ROBINSON 515 516 519 520 520 531 526
STONY POINT 264 266 266 267 267 268 265
WOOD BROOK 397 400 401 403 403 402 387
YANCEY 153 155 157 157 159 159 160
BURLEY 439 444 444 442 441 445 437
HENLEY 664 669 669 671 671 673 672
JOUETT 576 581 582 582 580 588 589
WALTON 512 518 521 521 523 527 515
ALBEMARLE 1,523 1,567 1,582 1,584 1,590 1,590 1563
WESTERN 921 929 931 934 933 934 932
MURRAY HIGH 68 75 75 76 76 80 76
TOTAL.: ........... - -. 1P,P1)U ............. . ;'~O,()14:): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"""""'.9&79". ,:):1P;Q.$$} '. '.10....8 ..,',.,' .',','.'.. 0 144 ,',' """10 '012'
. . . . . .. . . j::::,:..!Q;.;1::::n::::U1,:,(,:;;:;,j:n:U:j',:;:;I;:,,;:;,::
. . . . .. - . .
. . . . . .. . .
...... - ..
...... ..
...... ...
.......... . ::;:;:;:;::::-:..;::::-::;::
" , ......... . ............ " ...........................
CHANGE FROM DAY 1 138 186 195 202 265 133
9/11/91
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOLS
FY198~90ENROLLMENT
DAY 5 DAY 10 SEPT. 30 MAR. 31
BROADUS WOOD 398 399 399 407
BROWNSVILLE 301 304 305 313
CROZET 243 246 248 246
GREER 628 633 633 632
HaLL YM EAD 601 598 599 618
MERIWETHER LEWIS 660 669 668 674
RED HILL 347 350 346 334
ROSE HILL 381 381 382 375
SCOTTSVILLE 184 185 184 185
STONE ROBINSON 515 516 521 525
STONY POINT 243 242 238 238
WOODBROOK 378 386 386 371
YANCEY 169 169 169 160
BURLEY 439 439 439 435
HENLEY 630 634 631 632
JOUETT 567 570 577 579
WALTON 430 433 433 441
ALBEMARLE 1,572 1,579 1,585 1,526
WESTERN 877 882 877 877
MURRAY HIGH 78 77 77 77
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... -. - - -. -. -... 9,$97/ ' 9.64$
::9641 :":..:.'.'.~,~~~.:.,'.
,.......,.......,"~,.,...., ~H.;.:.;.;:>;.i
CHANGE FROM DAY 5
51
56
4
~
Presenter's Outline
I. Introductory Comments Suited to Particular Audience.
II. Meals Tax Defined
A. Actual Question on Ballot
B. Referendum Requirement for Counties, Ordinance Without Referendum for
Cities
1. 38 cities and 10 counties across Commonwealth presently have meals tax
2. City of Charlottesville presently imposes meals tax and has since 1983
III. Why the Need for Additional Revenue?
A. Raise funds dedicated solely to renovating and expanding existing schools and
constructing new school facilities.
1. Growth in Enrollment
a. Average daily membership has grown from 9,275 to 10,144, over a 9% increase, in
last three years and projected to expand by 4,300 additional students by year
2000
b. This increase over the next 10 years is equivalent to the entire current
Charlottesville enrollment.
2. Enrollment growth creates need for expanded and new school facilities.
a. Average cost of new elementary school today is $6 million annually.
b. County has borrowed over $30 million in past 3 years to fund school
projects.
B. Anticipated to Raise $1.4 million annually
1. Equivalent to a 4 cent increase in real estate tax rate, yet reduces dependence on
property tax.
2. Estimated that 50% of tax will be paid by non-residents, e.g. people in surrounding
counties who work in Charlottesville, U.Va. students, and tourists.
3. Affects both property owners and non-property owners.
IV. Other Revenue Sources for Capital Items
A. Borrowed Funds
1. Debt service has increased from $2 million in 1989 to $5.3 million projected for
fiscal year 92/93.
V. Ways the Organization Can Help
1. Discussing the need for the meals tax with neighbors and friends
2. Distributing brochures to other members and friends
3. Setting up a phone bank to encourage voters prior to election day
4. Volunteering to distribute brochures at the polls
VI. Summary and Questions
REH/dbm
91.55
....
o
co
c:
~
. c:
<Z
. I
. ~
V
V
c:
:I:
t-
~
o
0:=
~
0:= oJ)
v
o '~
u.. E
~
~
o
Z
~
Z
- ~
>- e<:l
<( ~
c..E5
oJ)
v
u
'E
v
oJ)
01)
c:
T.>
::I
-0
V
....
.s
~
o
....
01)
,5'
'g
r"
c:
.9
oJ)
-0
c:
<Z
{S'O
~ oJ)
V
~~
o
oJ)
'"
c
V
S
v
>
o
....
0..
.5
~-o
V c:
.... e<:l
S ~
0'-
<l:: E
13&
,[: en" V
v~:o
-0 c: ol
~8~
E;'::: >-
V e<:l
.... ~ oJ)
5 ;s ~
u oJ) c:
V v V
.... ~ >
e<:l oJ) ~
~ ~ B
a ~ ;s
V e<:l oJ)
> ...... ....
V >-. 0
..........
....-
0;; V e<:l
U 0......
Q2~
....J o..~
v;c;o
V c: c:
a ~ V
~ ~ ~
v 0.. v
~-o""
c: v
~OlE5
U v
j rg ~
'2~~
'50
~Z
~~
~s
~~
;:::c
0_ v
~t
;::: a
~~
I ~
..c:
''"'''''If:-<
~
.~
U
....
.2
.5
-o:9(<'l~V
c:: 0.. .... =
Cd ~ t:; .-
.....ol>-.~
v oJ) 0...0 v
0..:.2 v E ~
a:l';;.s~~
0........ .... ~ e<:l
o V v oJ)..c:
0::1 15_u
.0.0 8c
o . C..c: v
. (<'l0 V u....
>-.06"'5
-..c-.:::t",=f-lU
c:0\2gv
:I: ~ ~ ~ c: 'E
L- O..c: .... c:
r- 5n'Ooo v
:> c:OOv
;> ~ Ol-8~.s
O..c:>-.",'<1'o
>-..0 c: _ ......
c ~.- gJ ......
0:= ::IOVOC:
o l-o ~"..... ~
~UOl)ai;g~
2 .9 g ~ .;
u.. .... -0 .- <:r
e<:l v c: V
O 6......~ e<:l '"
2 ~ 0\ ;:::: .-
-.0' ol 0 :'A
V)-:X:C5..c:2ai
. v v ....
t- ~.~ ~ 2 g
V) ~ ~ ll) ..., .- E
O >-'e<:l>UoJ)V
OVOlv:.2c
N >-...c: ~f:-<:5
U......o v v .2
~-~-ogc:
u.I o..';<..c:'~ov
:I: v v...... ",NO
..c: c: ~ .... .... 0
...... 0 ol Ol..c:
L- c:~....VVU
r-~...,bO::>-.>-.CIJ
v
'" ::I
C -0
V
6 ~ ~
~~ai
o..c:>-'
o>-.~v
o;::v~
-8Ol....
CIJ (1)_....,
....>-.i3~oJ)
ovoo..-o
""'-S-v~
oJ) E..c: c:
-gio......-o
c.2 ~ ~ .S ~
"'v-o.:::!
-0 v E v v
V..c: 0- ....
~"""u-9..c:
O..c: ..........
tOl)oo~
O::l~-oO
.o8e<:l~5n
..c:..c:t>..c:
b1}"'" :;:j ...., ~
6~6~-B
..c:.goJ)oo
'=:--06-0
-:x: '@ g v ~
,.~4-<>
oJ) e<:l-
-g~13..c:8
::IOl~~..c:
~~2:B~
1~.8~.9
ovvol~
'-' > r.I') 0..._
o 0 ~ v ~
P=lC5........~6
___ 6 c: ..c: ";::
.0 ._ 0 f:-< 0..
'"
v
~o ~ ~
t 'Ej :: ~
..c: '" 0 ::I
'0 c: 0 0
o..c:..c:
~';:i ~ (1)
+-I g C:'~
aJ'-O 0 C
U ~ v v
';; v S '"
.... _"--0
v.o ...... V
CIJ ,_ _ Cj
....... ~ tU :::s
.00>-0
~o..E~
'-' en $-i
o v'2 0
:o.~ ~ cti
c: > v V
Cdl-ol"...;-
~ U,~
~ C...r:: rJj
~ 0"-. ~,~
'st: ~ ll)'~
....60::1::::
o..u..2~~
-!...l-oUll)~
;So "'.... >-.
t.I:l .5.- v -0 c
~ e<:l v>..c: c: ::l
~ U ...... e<:l 0
...... '-'~ c cuU
t .2 v.~ J:: ....
~ '" -B ,!:::j 4-< ~
i.I':)-gV oJ) 0"""
::I U oJ) 0
~<+:. ::I oJ) C -0
;:::-13.:::! Vs c:
..... ~ l-o U Cd
~ 0 0 .... V oJ)'
~";:::...... ~ ~~
~ ~.;!l ~ 0.. ~
~-ov-~o..
~ ~.::: ol -0 ",'
::l -=: V V v
lOw -0 .....-
..c: E ::l .... ~
.~ ll) - c2 '-'
>......uv.o
~ ;;> ~ ,;:: -0 ;.:::
....
:::
~
EU')
:::::
e
~
..,.
(')
-
<::>
<::>
.s::
....
V:i
(IJ
.....
,....
o
(spussn041)
(J)
ro
~
:::
~
~
~
~
e
J.;
<::>
Q:l
'Q>
....
""
(3
~
""
""
l::l
'"
....
....
~
<<>~"'l'fC?~-O-:
o
o
o
(J) -
(J)(IJ
(J)
.....-ro
(J)
(J)
r- -
(J)'-
(J)
-<0
'-(J)
(J)
U') .
(J)'-
(J)
....,.
'-(J)
(J)
(') -
(J)"'"
(J)
"(\J
'-(J)
.- (J).
(J)'-
(J)
.-~
(J)
(J)
(J) -
ro'-
(J)
,....-<:D
ro
(J)
r- -
ro'-
C1J
.,..-ID
ro
C1J
U') -
en'-
(J).
>-.
C
V ::l C
'" .... 0 V
V ~ U S
.::: ~ c 0,) ~
5-3v-so
v U 0 ....
.... ::l f:-< . 0..
o t: V E
~~~~~
~ ~ 5 ~s
::; ,;:: S.5 '5.
.0 U v e<:l
oJ)"c;j 6 ~ U
_Cd "-" Cd 0)
0.0 o..oJ)..c:
o -0 8.~ ......
-8 C:.- ,-=: -0
"'e<:l-o::::~
-",~UC;
gJ~2<Zlu
.9 .~ ~ B ~
.~ s..... C Cd u
-o.oe<:l::lV
~;.::: 6 2""2'
....c:.v~o..
~ .S tn ...., "a
....... >-. Cd ......
-0 ~ '" -B .5.
V ...... l--l Cd
~OV-oU
C5..C<Jc:....
:<l)~~.s:
~,!:: E ~ c:
ol-.... s::; ol
Ij,)~ 8 -
.... = oJ) V 0..
u ro rJ'J ~ $-,
>-'vol",i'S
-a .~ ..c: 13 ~
0- U V v
'O&~C:t6
C:-ovi~ c
..c:v-ovols::;
......~c:..c:oJ)ol
~ V e<:l ...... ...... ....
0....8......0..01)
....uve<:l-8e
o "5 -0 -B ol 0..
..c:
co
i
~c
.... ol
e<:l-=:
8 V
V 8
.ov
:;(~
.9'g
;gq:
o ....
.;:: 0
e<:l =
> 01)
g-:x:
~ ~
v v
.... =
e<:l V
~-B
0..15
...... ol
=
~o
.... 0
::I..c:
U U
vVJ
..c: V
~;a
._ -0
~~
U
v>-.
.~~
.... ....
o..::l
4-<P=l
0-0
oJ) c:
V ol
~oc5
800
~-8-8
WVJVJ
E
!;{
;;;
'"
g-
i
~
~
*
i
~
...
oJ)
c: ~
.g .~
ro .~
~=-a
:B<Zl
....-
V 0
-0 0
.2-8
U '"
,5 ~
. <!)
-0 c:
V 4-<
-g 0
<Z 5
...... ,-
o ......
c: g
......t:
::I oJ)
.0 c:
-0 0
V U
t;:;-o
...... c:
c: e<:l
~.!!.l
.- 0
:B]
] ~
<U co
~ 'E
..c: .;!l
..c: ~
U V
:.2'0
~ oJ)
. c:
~,9
~ ~
c: 8-
V ~
.... v
3-0
~ ~
c~]
ca .- ......
.=:~[
~ e.u
v v._
.... ...... ......
V 0;; c:
..c: v e<:l
...... = oJ)
-00.-
c:: .-:::
e<:l ~ .
-BSO
~ ._ c:
oo..::l
.... 0 0
OI)vU
.... :::l V
.2:B-B
>-.>c:
~ ~.-
o..~-o
.9 ~ ~
rJ'J Ij,) ~
V .... oJ)
a~~
V .... e<:l
> V V
~.s E
4-<
o
rJ'Jr,;::::::
Vol"';
'" ~ 0 ol
v .s ...... V
~e~>-'
::l e<:l......
o ...... oJ)
oJ) &......,!::
_0C:-
ro $-, Q.) Q)
c: o..u..c:
. .9 OJ) "l::t ......
:B'~ ro.5
. -0 ol 01)-0
,..""". ol ~ ,5 v
~ -g g:g.;!l
''.It+::;';::e<:l~
c......o>-.v
f"'oo. ;g~P=l.o
~ 6 'Qi ~ ~
!.- V:::l e<:l 0
Q::~~~~
~{loo
~ :~ i E ]
~ ~ '" ~~
~ 0).-
.- -
~ O).~ Q) vt
,..""". .0:::: C<J_
~B~~~
~ v- V 0
~ ~ 8 -B :E
",..c:>-.-O
Vu.o-O
U oJ) ol
~ ';; '0 13 c:
_N .... '" ~ e<:l
~ ~ tn 0 ~
~;=;8~-B
c:-v
o >
.~ ~
.s ~
E ......
o OJ)
U ,5
U
0I)::l
c:-o
.- v
a ....
e<:l t::
~&
V 0..
-B ~
-0'0
~ c:
"E-8
ol oJ)
~g.
8~
..c: v
U oJ)
VJ V
v..c:
..c:f:-<
...... ,
...c:
'" ......
.... ~
.~ e
> 01)
....-0
&~
::I e<:l
VJ-V
4-< ....
o...!..
"E 8
e<:l..c:
o U
P=l':
v 0
-S~
>-.'"
.0 8
-0 V
~-B
o ....
-g.2
V>-'.
c: e<:l c:
V 0.. 0
V 0';:::
.0......0..
oJ) ~ 0
~ ~ ~
~ V oJ)
;S:O ro
rJ'J $j rJ'J
c; '5 8
(],) c:r'-
Eve
oJ) = <l)
:.2 e<:l '"
f:-<~'O
o (ll @ '-n:~' .
......><~o......
{A a -..., -.::t:
::: '0 ~ e? g 0
~~Sm..,::E:
N~ ..... (ll I'D
8.....(ll{A~:3
g-~ ~ ~ t:::
~ (') 0 ~ ~
OO~:3c:::t'
E..~;:;=.: ~
o.......'<::::-::::'!""
o 0"'0
g ..... S ::s c;;. t:::
::r >< ~ I'D j::;-
{A(ll...,O!"'l>_
t S ~ S ~~
v.><(llo.. ~
0"2 0''''' fIJ.....
'~""2~I'D
""(1c::~fIJ
o 0 ::;. I'D ~
::ss~~ii
8--.<~~"O
(ll..., ........,
:3 (ll @ t::: 0
(ll ~'::S ::3"0
0..0".....-I'D
~.g ....,0..,
::s ;jj ?l ......~
::r' "":3
~~~g~
.....I'D fIJ
<: ::s~
~ ......~ ::3
- ::r I'D
~ (ll I'D
Q..
.,.,
g
'"
0..
g:
0'
::s
!::.
5'
~
::s
~
o.
?
(')
~
&
"
I:ll
o
::;
0..
o
....,
m
c:
~
~~
o
....,
::'l
(')
"
!::
N
\0
a-
U.
00
"'"
w
"0
c:
2::
'J>
::r
"
0..
~
'<
o
:;
5'
0'
3
:,;
o.
::s
cr
'<
0' ~.~
(') (fO 0
~ ::r' (')
-.....(!)
(JQ $:lj ...,
(!) 0 '-<
::s 0.. en
(!) .....
..., 0 0
e?. ~ @
en I en
$:lj ::r'
~e?.
en ......,
$:lj'O
::s (!)
o..(=l
c:: (!)
en 0
(!) .....
&
"
;p-
O'
"
3
::;
'"
n
o
c:
::s
Q
I:ll
o
::;
0..
o
....,
m
c:
"0
~
""
;;;'
~
$:lj
o
0..
0..
~
....
(')
$:lj
.....
(!)
..... ~ ~
~ ::r' (!)
.~ (!) ::s
~ ::s (')
$:lj 0
o..c::
0..0
(!) .....
o..~
..... en
o ~
..... 0
::TO
(!) .....
Cf)
.....
$:lj
.....
(!)
$:lj
::s
0..
o 0' 0' ~
::S~~Cf)
'0 (!) (!) ::r'
..., ..., ..., e?.
(!) $:lj $:lj-
"2~~ >
@en.....e;::
o..en$:lj(!)
o ~ 3
~ 0: 0 $:lj
o ......, ...,
0..0'::s~
~ ..., 0
(=)' ::r' 3 n
::r' c:: 0
(!) S 0 c::
en $:lj @ ~
$:lj 0 '-<
0(')8-0'
o..o~(!)
~. 0 $:lj
o ~ 0' c::
o.3..Sc::8-
~~""g
:3 ....'0 ....
(!) 0 (!) N
M 0 ..., (!)
:::. (')0..
o'(!)
'E. '<: a 8"
$:lj ...
..... (!)
..... en
(!) .....
..., $:lj
en c::
en ...,
o $:lj
o:a
en
.....
o
(!)
~
(')
(!)
(!)
0..0'
'<:
g ~
'='1'-<
g $:lj
0..'='1
$:lj 0
o 0
$:ljo..o..
::s $:lj
0.. 5.
m m :::0 .
~ 2.. (ll
<:(ll<:::t:
().~ g 0
(ll ,,=,,>C:: ~
o 0 (ll ""
::s ..., m
o r5 ;;l ~.
f"""1' ::::::r -.......
g-o~-
...,00.._
- :::t'
m(')cr....
g. 0 '<l 'W
g~8-:3
-::;(llo
~~:3::3
o ;::t'. (ll I'D
'(5. 8 e:..~
(') ..... en
..... ~ ..... 0-
~8.~I'D
.....~t:::
g-@~
..., ..... Q..
(ll ::s .~
c.Ft
@8.
:3 (ll
(ll 0..
::s .....
.....0
00-
"""(ll
~c::
g"~
0..
no
o ::s
5 Z
..... 0
'<: <:
~ (!)
::::.:3
- 0'
(!)
...,
0'
(!)
$:lj ~Vl
en
:>;"'-
(!) \0
0..\0
..... ......
o ~
<..0
o c::
..... $:lj
(l ::-:
o ::::n
::s 8-
.....
::r'<
(!) 0
.....
sa
Co
~ ......,
5' ;J>
(fOe;::
..0 (!)
c:: 3
~ $:lj
.....::!..
o' (!)
::s
=:tl~.
...,
;!;. v;' ::t:
'<:(ll0
g :=.::E:
..., ~:3
(ll t:::
o..~
8-:::t'
~:3
{AO
~::3
~I'D
8~
=~
0'-.
::s:::::::
.l.-
o..~
2..I'D('"
~:3
m I'D
~ ~
.....-
:::::fIJ
g~
..., ><
e?,..,
m ~
8.. Vi.
.....I'D
::s .~
.....
::r
(ll
:;i
/"t)
I'")
.... .
.......
~.
/"t)
::3
en
o
"""h.
~
5=
/"t)
:3
~
~
/"t)
en
::r-
o
t::
Q:
S"'
o
~
~""'.-J.
o..::r:::r
2:(ll(ll::t:
g,~ 80
::s ~ ~ ~
~:--><""
;: 'Tj S' :3
NOC::t:::
(') ..., 8 ~
g ~ ~ :::t'
..... ~ 8 ~
~ 8 0 ""
'0 c:: -.
~g:::::::
~g,s.
::s.....I'D
::r
~(ll:3
oS I'D
o><~
8 ~ Vi"'
(ll ....'
~::=c:r
-0--""
~ (ll ....
O~o-
c:: I'D
0:: ~ .~
(') 0
o ......
m .....
.....::r
~ (ll
::s (')
o
m
.....
0,
......
~ >-<: .
8 ~ ,....,
(ll'V
e:..(10
::;0
~ @ S.
~ gI'D
;::i"-<" ..,
(') ~ .....
2"_0
2:0Q
= () ~
(Jq 0 -.
f"""1' C ~.
::r::SI'D
(ll ;::t'.fIJ
(ll
(1m:::t'
::;.'~ ~
'<: ::s 0:::
o 0.. I'D
......w~
(100
::r(')~
~ ~.;:J
..., .....I'D
o~~
~ ~ Vi"'
mQ"""
:;:,0 ~
:::::~><
(ll .~
. -<
::;.
(Jq
S'
~'
::r
~
<:
(ll
0"'0 Z -. .
'<:80::3
.....'0 ....."0 ~
::r(ll::S..,~
(ll :4 (ll 0 :::::::
8'<:@"O
[~ ~ ~ ~
: ~ 2.:~ ~
~ 0-':< """ ~
. '<: ...... ~ Vi"'
..........><
::r ~ I'D :::'!'
(ll ....' fIJ ...
~:::::::3><
8...,I'D"O
O(ll><..,
Sg-_I'D
.....(')_ 0:::
0(ll,I'D
...... ..... I'D ::3
::r~
~(ll"'-
0.. .~ ~
2:Q ::3
;::t',c:: ~
o ::s
E:5 -.< S.
- ~ ~
..., m ..,
~~ I'D
~ '0 ~
..... (ll fIJ
C::::s I'D
(ll 0..
~ g
~ @
..., 0
~::s
(ll
0..
~ (') ..., "'- .
~ 0 ~ b
~ 8 .....'<: ~
V;-:3~g~
SSF(llo
>< ::;.' (') ~-
..., '<: -.::s- ~
~ :...-.< 0 ~
(ll........,(')~
::s ..... (ll ::s-
~ m ~. g ~
(ll 0.. m
~ :=. g ~ :3
Esrr""f"t'O
o-~.....o~
(ll (ii 0 (ll Vi"'
0..C::~
~ ::!.r-to. ,,;
e? 8- ;!;. 0 ::
o..~~ c:: ><
~ l"""t- r.n r .'"
'-' ~ .....
,<:'Oc::~
::s '0 ~::r
o ..., ::s (ll
::s ~ ..... 8-
~ .....0 (ll
(ll 8 ..., ...,
~.~ 08-
0..~8-(ll
(ll '<: (ll '<:
g ....
m VI ~
. O:;:.@
~~.~
00(')
..........0
&05
(ll 0 .....
c::'<:
...,
.
~
rt)
~
-
ell
-I
~
>(
-
~
~
o
~
3
~
,.....
-.
o
::s
r
"
~
rt)
~
-
-t
~
~
-n
~
n
,.....
CI)
.
.
.
'...
f'~ t:7 fJ'tl f( S-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors d ,-=--~
County Executive~t{j!
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
August 26, 1991
RE: School Division Leave Experiment
Several of you recently expressed interest in the School Board's
recently adopted leave policy for the School Division. Attached is
a memorandum from Dr. Hastings explaining this matter. (Additional
information mentioned in Dr. Hastings' memo has not been attached
since it is quite lengthy but can be provided upon request.)
In summary, the policy is for ten and eleven month school
employees. These employees do not receive annual leave like local
government employees or twelve month classified school employees.
Therefore, this policy is not seen as a commonality issue with the
school system.
If you would like to discuss this matter further, I would recommend
that you add this to the agenda of your upcoming meeting with the
School Board on September 11th.
RWT,Jr/dbm
91.124
Attachment
MEMO - TUCKER
AUGUST 23, 1991
PAGE 2
The reason that this is not a commonality issue is that
local government does not have employees working on a school year
schedule. The employees that are similar to local government
continue to be governed under the same leave provisions as those
in place for local government employees. Should you have further
questions on this matter, please feel free to call me.
CAH/ac
m-910823.2
enclosure
cc: R.W. Paskel, Superintendent
"
...
.<'
;-,''{ ur f.\LUF,I\"i'J-;L E.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
To: Robert W. Paskel, Superintendent
From: Dr. Carole A. Hastings, Assistan
for Personnel/Human Resources
Date: July 30, 1991
Re: Report on Teacher Absenteeism in Albemarle County
The purpose of this correspondence is to report to you on a
study of teacher absenteeism that has been ongoing since 1985 and
the results of an experiment in the management of teacher leave
that has been piloted for the past three years (see attachment
1). As you will see from the following data, Albemarle County
has been successful in managing an issue which has been an
increasingly problematic one throughout the country.
BACKGROUND
The issue of teacher absenteeism is an important one in two
significant ways. First, the monetary impact is a visible and
growing concern to school divisions across the country. The
second impact, which is less immediately identifiable but more
important, is in the loss of quality learning time available to
students when regular instructional staff are absent from the
classroom. Recognizing the problems attendant to teacher
absenteeism, Albemarle County convened a task force to review the
issue during the 1985-86 school year. The task force compared
Albemarle County's absenteeism with data from education and the
private sector.
1. Scope of the Problem.
While there are a number of factors responsible for
absenteeism in the labor force, many of them interactional in
nature, a report published by the National Association of
Secondary School Principals (NASSP) in March, 1982 concluded that
among the various factors,
MEMO - R. PASKEL
JULY 30, 1991
PAGE 2
1. paid sick leave is the widest-held fringe benefit in
the country;
2. the rate of teacher absenteeism increases from
September through May;
3. the highest rate of absenteeism occurs on Monday and
Friday;
4. High levels of absenteeism occur in school districts
where low levels of faculty agreement concerning goals
and policies of the district exist;
5. where such agreement, and community support for the
schools, does exist, lower levels of absenteeism occur;
6. teacher absenteeism is reduced when teachers have a
direct relationship with their immediate supervisors on
this issue;
7. factors such as salary, marital status, family size,
level or education, and experience do not consistently
relate to increased absenteeism;
8. employees with higher levels of position in the
organization are absent less often than employees with
lower job levels.1
Several studies have been conducted to determine trends in
absenteeism rates in both education and other labor sectors.
While different factors obviously affect trends dependent upon
the population studied, some important information is provided by
these studies.
The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that
from 1967 to 1974, the rate of absenteeism in the category
"education" was double that of total U.S. labor and industry.2
Further, while information from agencies such as the Bureau
of National Affairs and the National Center for Health Statistics
reported significant decreases in absences during the periods of
1973-78 and 1965-75 respectively, studies of teacher absences
showed an opposite trend. A major study of teacher absenteeism
conducted by 135 Pennsylvania school districts during the 1977-78
school year found that the average teacher was absent 8.2 days, a
46% increase over earlier data collected from the same group.
Other findings of this study revealed that teacher
MEMO - R. PASKEL
JULY 30, 1991
PAGE 3
absenteeism was significantly higher than that of major industry
or the professional and technical absenteeism rate for private
industry. 3
Educational Research Service of Arlington, Virginia, in a
1981 study National Survey on Staff Absenteeism, concluded the
following:
a. The average number of days absent for teachers, including
absences for all reasons, was eight days per year with very large
systems (25,000 or more students) experiencing the highest rate
and small systems (300-2499 students) experiencing the lowest
rate. Similarly, urban areas experienced more teacher
absenteeism than did rural areas. .
b. Rates of pay seemed to affect the absenteeism rate with
higher rates of average salary for teachers being related to
higher absenteeism rates.
c. The method of absence reporting also affected the absenteeism
rate, with direct reporting to immediate supervisors experiencing
the lowest rate and reporting to a telephone answering system
the highest rates of absenteeism.4
Fiscal and Instructional Costs
The financial impact of teacher absenteeism has, also,
presented significant concern to school districts. A Stanford
University study conducted in 1977-78 concluded,"...the loss of
time from teacher absence in the elementary and secondary schools
alone cost more than on-half billion dollars for substitutes and
$120 million in fringe benefits that teachers receive whether or
not they are in their classrooms."s
While the financial costs of teacher absenteeism are
significant, the instructional costs may be more alarming. The
absence of the regularly employed teacher requires the use of a
substitute. When a substitute teacher is in the classroom, the
instructional program is weakened. This fact is confirmed by a
New York State Department of Education study which concluded that
".. . substitutes were significantly less effective in instruction
than student teachers."6
Further documentation of the impact of teacher absences on
instruction comes from two sources. Wiley and Harnischfeger
report that:
"In terms of typical gains in achievement over a year's
period we concluded that in schools where students receive 24%
~
MEMO R. PASKEL
JULY 30, 1991
PAGE 4
more schooling, they will increase their average gain in reading
comprehension by two-thirds and their gain in mathematics and
verbal skills by more than one-third. These tremendous effects
indicate that the amount of schooling a child receives is a
highly relevant factor in his achievement."G
Denham and Lieberman, in their 1980 study, concur and
state, "Real academic results are related to the time students
are effectively engaged in instruction, a situation that is
rarely the case when substitutes are in the classroom."7
Teacher Absenteeism in Albemarle County
The rate of teacher absenteeism in Albemarle County during
the period of 1985-1988 was between ten and eleven days for all
reasons including personal sick leave, illness in family,
personal leave, and professional leave. Thus, Albemarle County
teachers were losing between five and six percent of their
contract time and six percent of the instructional time devoted
to student learning. In 1988, a pilot of a plan to manage
teacher leave at the building level was initiated in four County
schools. The objectives of the pilot were as follows:
1. to provide the maximum amount of quality instructional time
to students;
2. to place decisionmaking for teacher leave where it can best
be managed (i.e. at the building level);
3. to provide teachers with opportunities to meet their needs
for leave.
When the pilot was first introduced, one of the fears was
that teacher absenteeism would increase without the constraints
imposed by division policy. A second reservation had to do with
the concern over a lack of consistency between buildings. A
survey of teachers after the first year of the pilot, however,
indicated a high degree of support for the plan. Teachers cited
satisfaction with the professionalism of the plan and the fact
that leave could be granted based on their individual needs.
In November of 1989, the School Board adopted a County-wide
acceptable attendance standard which was incorporated into the
pilot. Also, during the 1989-90 and 1990-91 school years, all
schools were invited to participate in the pilot program. In
effect, teachers were allowed to choose between the existing
policy of leave being governed through central policy or the more
flexible pilot. In either case, however, teachers were still
MEMO R. PASKEL
JULY 30, 1991
PAGE 5
responsible for maintaining acceptable attendance as defined in
County policy. During the 1990-91 school year, substitute
teacher funds were also transferred to the building level for the
first time.
Results of the Pilot
Attachment 2, Results of the Teacher Leave Experiment,
indicate that, over the three-year course of the pilot, the
average number of days that teachers were absent has shown a
marked decline from the 1985-88 data. Where the average number
of days missed for all reasons was between 10 and 11 previously,
the average number of days over the three year pilot'has been 7.5
or a reduction of 25%. In the area of sick leave, which has been
the focus of national concern, Albemarle County teachers had been
experiencing an average of 7 days of sick leave prior to the
pilot. Over the three year pilot study, the average of sick
leave used by pilot teachers was 4.7, or a reduction of 33%. In
addition, the rate of absenteeism due to sick leave, previously
at 4% of available work time has averaged 2.4% for teachers
participating in the pilot. Surveys of teachers in each of the
three years of the pilot have indicated that there continues to
be a high degree of satisfaction with the plan. During the past
year, 82% of the teachers chose to have leave managed under the
provisions of the pilot program vs. the centralized policy
approach. Concerns are still voiced about the inconsistencies
between buildings, however I believe that such inconsistencies
will occur as the division moves forward into more instances of
school-based decisions. Another concern expressed by teachers
has been the constraints they feel are imposed with the County's
acceptable attendance policy. This issue, however, is one that
is separate from the way decisions are made about leave which is
the focus of the leave experiment.
Recommendations
Maintaining a dual leave management system for 18% of the
teachers, while possible, does create problems with principals
knowing under which provisions a teacher's leave requests are
made. In addition, an experiment has taken place over a three-
year period and has been carefully evaluated and has produced
results. It is, therefore, the recommendation that the teacher
leave experiment become the plan under which teacher leave is
managed for the entire division next year. In addition, the
Board's approval of this concept being piloted in several schools
for ten and eleven-month classified staff (i.e. those employees
MEMO R. PASKEL
JULY 30, 1991
PAGE 6
who do not earn annual leave) is requested. A recent survey of
principals indicates that half of the schools would be interested
in piloting this concept for classified staff.
In summary, the results of the teacher leave pilot have
demonstrated that teachers can, in conjunction with their '
principals, make responsible decisions about their leave needs at
the building level and under broad parameters. In addition, the
division's rate of teacher absenteeism has continued to drop, a
trend which is enviable throughout the country. If I can provide
more data to you, please feel free to contact me.
CAH/ac
m-910726
enclosures
REFERENCES
1. The Practitioner, Vol. VIII, No. 2
National Association of Secondary School Principals
March, 1982
2. J.N. Hedges, "Unscheduled Absence from Work - An Update,"
Monthly Labor Review
August, 1975
3. The Practitioner, Vol. VIII, No.2
National Association of Secondary School Principals
March, 1982
4. Educational Research Service, "Teacher Absenteeism:
Experience and Practices of School Systems", pp V-VI, 1981
5. Edwin M. Bridges, "Job Satisfaction and Teacher Absenteeism,"
Educational Administration Quarterly,
Vol. 15, No.2, Spring, 1980
6. New York State Office of Education and Performance Review.
Teacher Absenteeism in New York City and the Cost
Effectiveness of Substitute Teachers, Albany, N.Y. State
Department of Education, January 1974
7. D.E. Wiley, and A. Harnischfeger, "Explain of a Myth: Quality
of Schooling and Exposure to Instruction, Major Educational
Vehicles," Educational Researcher, April, 1974, pp 7-12
8. Carolyn Denham, and Ann Lieberman, eds. Time to Learn,
National Institute of Education, May, 1980
...
TEACHER LEAVE EXPERIMENT
1990-1991
Consistent teacher presence in the cLassroom promotes and maintains
excellence in the instructional program of Albemarle County Public Schools by
providing uninterrupted continuity of instruction, greater teacher-student
contact time, consistent classroom discipline, and reduced substitute costs.
Professional educators are expected to commit the highest personal priority to
student learning. It is recognized that certain absences from providing
services to students are unavoidable. In such cases, the return to work of
absentee teachers at the earliest time commensurate with good health, safety
and reasonable personal consideration is an expectation. It is the intention
of the Albemarle County School Board that all employees shall strive to
maintain an acceptable attendance record, and that the occasional absences of
teachers shall not have an adverse affect on student learning. .
Several issues related to leave have been considered to be part of the
leave experiment when they are actually completely separate. These are:
1. Acceptable Attendance Policy: In November, 1989 both the School
Board and Board of Supervisors adopted an acceptable attendance
policy which applies to all County employees. The basic tenets of
this policy are:
a) acceptable attendance is a basic requirement for employment in
Albemarle County.
b) it is understood that sick leave functions as insurance against
long term illness. It is not to be used unless it is necessary.
c) a pattern of sick leave usage is what will determine whether any
action is necessary, i.e. monitoring, counseling, etc. This
pattern is determined over a three year period and excludes long
term illness and professional leave.
Thus a teacher may use more than average leave in one year withouL
repercussion as long as the pattern over three years remains in the acceptable
realm.
2. Professional Leave: While professional leave is not considered in
determining acceptable attendance, the principals needed some
guideline to use in making recommendations as to granting or denying
professional leave. After some discussion it was agreed that seven
days would be used as such a guideline since this has been the
average number of days missed per teacher for reasons other than
professional leave. The rationale for such a guideLine is that if
teachers have already been absent for a number of days, granting
additional time for conferences, workshops, etc. may not be
instructionally sound.
,
3. Budgeting for Substitutes, FY 90-91: Historically teachers have
missed on the average of nine days per person for all reasons.
Substitute funds have previously been budgeted centrally making it
difficult to manage this account. For 1990-91, funds equal to six
days per teacher have been allocated to each school to cover
substitute costs. For long term illnesses, i.e. those over 7
consecutive days, funds equal to 3 days per teacher have been
budgeted centrally. If these funds are not needed they will be
returned to the schools. Budgeting funds at the school level will
provide flexibility to meet school needs and also accountability for
the use of these funds. It does not restrict the number of leave
days that can be granted to an individual teacher.
ABSENCES:
1. Teachers will have access to their own earned leave to be used for
the purposes of personal sickness, family sickness, bereavement, and
personal business or recreation. Leave time must be approved by the
principal. The teacher must state the purpose for which the leave
is requested.
a. The principal and superintendent will periodically review
personnel absenteeism.
b. Leave time will be tracked in order to have records to transfer
unused leave if a teacher transfers to another school division.
c. This proposal does not include professional leave.
2. The Leave Profile Hecord which is managed at the school level will
continue to be maintained for all employees. The profile shows the
number and nature of absences to indicate if a pattern of absences
has developed, in order to help employees improve attendance.
a. Each absence, regardless of the length or reason, is to be
recorded as one occurrence.
b. If a pattern of absence develops employees shall be counseled or
referred to the Employee Assistance Program as appropriate,
prior to any disciplinary action, to help them initiate steps to
reduce their absenteeism.
c. The number of leave days taken and reasons for the leave will be
documented for informational purposes and the number of days
will be noted on the teacher's annual evaluation.
3. Sick Leave Accrual: Teachers earn sick leave at a rate of 1 1/4
days per month (12 1/2 per year) if employed before November 1,
1989. Teachers employed after November 1, 1989 earn sick leave at
the rate of 1 day per month (10 days per year).
.
,
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOLS
TEACHER LEAVE PROPOSAL EXPERIMENT
1990-1991 SCHOOL YEAR
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
1. What is the Teacher Leave Proposal Experiment?
The Teacher Leave Proposal is an experiment with a different way of
managing the issue of teacher leave from the classroom. It is recognized
that teachers are crucial to effective instruction. It is also
recognized that teachers have needs which at times must be met when
school is in session.
2. What are the objectives of the Teacher Leave Proposal Experiment?
There are three objectives for this experiment:
1) to provide the maximum amount of quality instructional time to
students;
2) to place decisionmaking for teacher leave where it can best be
managed (i.e. at the building level);
3) to provide teachers with opportunities to meet their needs for leave.
3. Who can participate in the experiment?
During 1990-91 teachers from any Albemarle County School will have the
opportunity to participate in the experiment.
4. What are the components of the Teacher Leave Proposal Experiment?
Teachers may choose to participate at the beginning of the 1990-91 school
year. Participating teachers will have 14 1/2 days designated to their
leave if employed before November 1, 1989; otherwise 12 days will be
designated as a result of a change in Board policy on sick leave accrual.
Requests for any leave will be made to the principal with accompanying
reasons for the Leave. Approved Leave will be deducted from the
teacher's leave balance.
5. For what reasons may leave be taken?
1) personal illness
2) family illness
3) bereavement
4) personal business
5) recrea tion
Teachers must provide the reason for each instance where leave IS needed.
I. .. ,
6. Is there a maximum on the number of days a teacher may request?
'fh~re are not limits to the amount of time a teacher may request,
provided they do not exceed the number of days in their leave balance.
Overall usage in a three year period, however, must be maintained in the
acceptable attendance range.
7. What is considered acceptable attendance?
Acceptable attendance is defined as not missing more than 2% of one's
available work time. For teachers, this translates to not missing more
than 4 days in anyone year for sick leave purposes.
8. What is considered sick leave?
Leave for three reasons is attributed to sick leave:
1) personal illness
2) illness in family
3) bereavement
9. What happens if I have a long term illness or need surgery?
Under the acceptable attendance policy, long term illness is defined as
missing more than 7 consecutive work days and the illness having been
verified by a physician. Long term illnesses are excluded from the
calculation for acceptable attendance.
10. What happens in the event of a long term illness?
1) The teacher would draw from the leave balance the number of unused
days they had for that year (maximum of 14 1/2 or 12, see
question 4).
2) The teacher would then draw from the sick leave balance they had
prior to the 1990-91 school year.
3) The teacher, if they are a member of the sick leave bank, may then be
able to draw from that bank in accordance with regulations governing
the sick leave bank.
11. What restrictions are there in terms of when leave may be requested?
There are no restrictions on when leave may be requested. The teacher's
need, coupled with the needs of the school and students, will be taken
into consideration by the principal in making decisions on granting or
denying leave.
J. " .
12. What will be the impact of school board policies or regulations governing
leave during the 1990-91 school year for participants?
For purposes of the experiment, teachers will be exempt from most school
board policies governing sick leave and personal leave. They are,
however, still responsible for maintaining an acceptable attendance
pattern.
13. Is professional leave considered to be part of this proposal?
Professional leave is not considered to be part of this pilot program but
will be managed in the same manner as it has been in the past.
14. What happens to a teacher's previous sick leave balance that had
accumulated prior to the pilot beginning?
A teacheris previous balance will remain in tact unless it is needed to
cover long term illness (see question 10).
15. If teachers in the pilot are being given the same days of credit as
nonpilot teachers what is the difference?
The difference is that teachers will have the flexibility to utilize
leave where they need it rather than having policy dictate what they can
use. For example, School Board policy limits the time for bereavement to
3 days and defines the relatives whose deaths would be covered under this
policy. In the pilot, teachers would be able to request bereavement time
for someone not defined in the policy or may be granted more than 3 days
where this is necessary.
The philosophy behind the teacher leave proposal is that teachers can
make responsible decisions about the types of leave they require and that
principals can make responsible decisions about what can best meet the
needs of teachers and students.
16. Will teachers in the pilot have to provide reasons to the
principal/designee for each time they require leave?
Yes. With the added flexibility of the pilot comes the increased
accountability of providing the reasons for why leave is needed.
17. What effect will the experiment have on a teacher's evaluation?
A teacher in the pilot will have the number of days utilized for leave
noted on their evaluation. Nothing punitive will result from their
participation in the experimental program, however acceptable attendance
is still an expectation and will be evaluated for all employees.
18. Can I change my mind about participating?
No. Once teachers choose to participate or not to participate for the
1990-91 school year, this decision will remain in effect for the entire
school year,
19. What advantages will result from the experiment?
Hopefully the pilot will provide a data base about why teachers really
need leave Lime. Under current policies, teachers are often forced to
call a need "sick leave" s.ince they have no flexibility in stating the
real reason for their leave request.
Secondly, it is anticipated that teachers and principals can best manage
this issue at the building level. 'rhe pilot will help in identifying the
problems that may exist with this expectation.
Thirdly, it is anticipated that, with increased flexibility and
accountability, a positive impact on absenteeism will be seen.
gathering data during the pilot years, more information will be
for future decision making in this area.
By
available
~ .
~
~
:I:
H
l3:
~
1'ztP4
0>4
~
t1J
8~
~l>
~~
~~
p::
l3:
~
:r:
u
fCll
~
8
- - - - - -
~iC 0'P 0\0 0\0 0\0 0'P '*'
UiC \0 N ..r ~ M rl
Hu) . . . . . .
U)~ N M N N N N
~ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
~o
~ rl
~~ 0 N r-- r-- \0 N
. . . . . .
~f5 1.0 \0 ..r 1.0 ..r ..r
~H
iC
8
Z
~
U)-
II1 l/] - - - - - -
< s::: '*' 0'P 0'P '*' 0'P '*'
0 ~ ex) ~ 0 0 1.0 rl \0 0
U) l/] ex) . . ~ . . ~ . .
~ ~ ~ M ..r ~ ..r ..r ~ M M
< Q) rl ...... ...... rl ...... ...... rl ...... ......
0 J..I
I 1.0 0 I ..r \0 I
~r-f ..r \0 ~ \0 rl 0
~r-f ex) . . ~ . . 0 . .
~~ ex) r-- ~ ex) r-- ex) ~ r-- \0
~ ~ ~
~ rl rl rl
:>
<
U)
P::
~
:r:~ - -
UZ 0'P 0'P
~H - - - - N ex)
~8 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 ex) rl
8< N ex) 0 0 ...... ......
p.. rl ex) ex) N
~H ...... ...... ...... ...... \0 r--
OU . .
H ..r 0 0 <Xl r-- 0
P::8 ex) rl ex) M ..r ..r
~~ \0 1.0 rl \0 rl
Sp..
Z
8 8 8
0 0 0
H H H
8 H 8 H 8 H
0 p.. 0 p.. 0 p..
H Z H Z H Z
H 0 H 0 H 0
p.. Z p.. Z p.. Z
P::
~
P:::r:
~u
nf5
f58
8P::
~
p::p..
~
p..U)
~
U)<
~o
<
or--
ex) 1.0
~~
~~
~~
ZZ
00
HH
88
~~
ZZ
-Ie -Ie
-Ie
,
ALB~ COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE
LEAVE PILOT
10 and 11 MONTH STAFF
1991-92
Consistent employee presence on the job promotes and maintains
excellence in Albemarle County Public Schools by providing uninterrupted
continuity of service, and reduced substitute costs. It is recognized that
certain absences from providing services in the schools are unavoidable. In
such cases, the return to work of absentee employees at the earliest time
commensurate with good health, safety and reasonable personal consideration is
an expectation. It is the intention of the Albemarle County School Board that
all employees shall strive to maintain an acceptable attendance record, and
that the occasional absences of employees shall not have an adverse affect on
student services.
ABSENCES:
1. Employees who work on a ten or eleven month schedule will have
access to their own earned leave to be used for the purposes of
personal sickness, family sickness, bereavement, and personal
business or recreation. Leave time must be approved by the
principal. The employee must state the purpose for which
the leave is requested. The principal and superintendent will
periodically review personnel absenteeism.
2. The Leave Profile Record which is managed at the school level will
continue to be maintained for all employees. The profile shows
the number and nature of absences to indicate if a pattern of
absences has developed, in order to help employees improve
attendance.
a. Each absence, regardless of the length or reason, is to be
recorded as one occurrence.
b. If a pattern of absence develops employees shall be
counseled or referred to the Employee Assistance Program as
appropriate, prior to any disciplinary action, to help them
initiate steps to reduce their absenteeism.
c. The number of leave days taken and reasons for the leave
will be documented for informational purposes and the number
of days will be noted on the employee's annual evaluation.
I
"-,.~
3. Sick Leave Accrual: Employees earn sick leave at a rate of 1 1/4
days per month (12 1/2 per year) if employed before November 1,
1989. Employees employed after November 1, 1989 earn sick leave
at the rate of 1 day per month (10 days per year). Note: Part
time employees earn a ~rorated portion of sick leave based on the
percentage of time ~.v:.~ked.
4. Acceptable Attendance Policy: In November, 1989 both the School
Board and Board of Supervisors adopted an acceptable attendance
policy which applies to all County employees. The basic tenets of
this policy are:
a) acceptable attendance is a basic requirement for employment in
Albemarle County.
b) it is understood that sick leave functions as insurance against
long term illness. It is not to be used unless it is necessary.
c) a pattern of sick leave usage is what will determine whether any
action is necessary, i.e. monitoring, counseling, etc. This
pattern is determined over a three year period and excludes long
term illness and professional leave.
Thus an employee may use more than average leave in one year without
repercussion as long as the pattern over three years remains in the acceptable
realm.
...
..
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOLS
CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE
LEAVE PILOT
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
1. What is the Classified Employee Leave Pilot?
a different way of managing the issue of
It is recognized that all employees are
It is 'also recognized that employees
be met when school is in session.
The Employee Leave Program is
employee leave from the job.
crucial to effective schools.
have needs which at times must
2. What are the objectives of the Classified Employee Leave Pilot?
There are three objectives for this program:
1) to provide the maximum amount of quality instructional time to
students and service to schools;
2) to place decisionmaking for employee leave where it can best be
managed (i.e. at the building level);
3) to provide employees with opportunities to meet their needs for
leave.
3. Who can participate in the experiment?
Ten and eleven month claSsified employees
Schools will participate in the program.
remain on the former leave program during
honored.
in certain Albemarle County
Any employee who chooses to
1991-92 will have this choice
4. What are the components of the Classified Employee Leave Program?
Employees will have 12 1/2 days designated to their leave if employed
before November 1, 1989; otherwise 10 days will be designated as a result
of a change in Board policy on sick leave accrual. Requests for any leave
will be made to the principal/designee with accompanying reasons for the
leave. Approved leave will be deducted from the employee's leave
balance.
5 . For what reasons may leave be taken?
1) personal illness
2) family illness
3 ) bereavement
4) personal business
5) recreation
19' ·
13. If employees in the new,proqram are being given the same days of credit
as employees had under the former policies, what is the difference?
The difference is that employees will have the flexibility to utilize
leave where they need it rather than having policy dictate what they can
use. For example, School Board policy limits the time for bereavement to
immediate family. In the leave program, employees would be able to
request bereavement time for someone not defined in the policy or may be
granted necessary days.
The philosophy behind the employee leave program is that employees can
make responsible decisions about the types of leave they require and that
principals can make responsible decisions about what can best meet the
needs of employees and students.
14. Will employees in the proqram have to provide reasons to the
principal/desiqnee for each time they require leave?
Yes. With the added flexibility of the e~loyee leave program comes
the increased accountability of providing the reasons for why leave is
needed.
15. What effect will leave have on a employee's evaluation?
Acceptable attendance is an expectation and is evaluated for all
employees.
16. Why can't twelve-month employees participate in the leave pilot?
Twelve month employees have access to annual leave and thus have
flexibility in requesting leave for purposes other than sick leave.
17. Are bus drivers and cafeteria employees included in the pilot?
No. For 1991-92 bus drivers and cafeteria employees are not eligible for
the pilot leave program.
18. What advantages will result from the new leave program?
Hopefully the program will provide a data base about why employees really
need leave time. Under former policies, employees were often forced to
call a need "sick leave" since they had no flexibility in stating the
real reason for their leave request.
Secondly, it is anticipated that employees and principals can best manage
this issue at the building level. The program will help in identifying
the problems that may exist with this expectation.
Thirdly, it is anticipated that, with increased flexibility and
accountability, a positive impact on absenteeism will be seen. By
gathering data during the pilot year, the school division hopes to see
that this expectation will be realized and that employees and principals
can manage leave in the best interests of staff members and students.
~ 10 q/JI
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
.-~' t' ,
Distributed to Board: 8/2>0/9 I
Agenda Item No, ql, 0904,'sJ 3
. '" 1>",..,. ".,f",,-,
,'"
;. ~
7 :1
!!
:j i9()j
l "
! if
:,:J
MEMORANDUM
,.t.,\ "
-~:
,) Hi;
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
August 26, 1991
of Supervisors ~
County Executive~1
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
RE: School Division Leave Experiment
Several of you recently expressed interest in the School Board's
recently adopted leave policy for the School Division. Attached is
a memorandum from Dr. Hastings explaining this matter. (Additional
information mentioned in Dr. Hastings' memo has not been attached
since it is quite lengthy but can be provided upon request.)
In summary, the policy is for ten and eleven month school
employees. These employees do not receive annual leave like local
government employees or twelve month classified school employees.
Therefore, this policy is not seen as a commonality issue with the
school system.
If you would like to discuss this matter further, I would recommend
that you add this to the agenda of your upcoming meeting with the
School Board on September 11th.
RWT,Jr/dbm
91.124
Attachment
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLt.
" EXECUTIVE OFFICii
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Robert W. Tucker Jr., County Executive
Dr. carole~.. ~~~Director of Personnel/Human
Resources ~- 0
August 23, 1991
School Division Leave Experiment
At your request, I am happy to provide information on the
recently approved leave experiment for ten and eleven month
employees of the school division. I have enclosed for your
review a report that was presented to the School Board at its
August 12 meeting. As you can see, a leave experiment has been
in place for teachers for the past three years. Essentially, the
premise behind the experiment was to allow site-based decisions
about teacher leave vs. the centralized policy approach. Ten and
eleven month employees, including teachers, do not receive annual
leave. Thus, where a local government or twelve month school
division employee can take leave for recreation or other personal
needs, the ten and eleven month school division staff had been
limited to only sick leave or, in the case of teachers, two
personal days. The leave experiment approached this issue by
saying that all employees are accountable for the County's
acceptable attendance standards. If a person remains within
these standards, there should be more flexibility in the use of
their leave. Over the three years of the experiment with
teachers, absenteeism was reduced and teachers felt better about
the flexibility of the program. The School Board, then, approved
the leave experiment as the teacher leave program for all
teachers with the exception that those who had chosen to remain
on the previous policies could continue to do so. Similarly, the
Board authorized the division to implement the experiment for ten
and eleven month classified staff and it will be piloted in
thirteen schools this year. Bus drivers and cafeteria staff will
not be eligible for the pilot this year. Twelve month staff who
accumulate annual leave, and are those employees with similar
schedules to local government employees, are also not eligible
for the pilot. I have attached also, for your information, the
fact sheet that describes the pilot for eligible classified
staff.
MEMO - TUCKER
AUGUST 23, 1991
PAGE 2
The reason that this is not a commonality issue is that
local government does not have employees working on a school year
schedule. The employees that are similar to local government
continue to be governed under the same leave provisions as those
in place for local government employees. Should you have further
questions on this matter, please feel free to call me.
CAH/ac
m-910823.2
enclosure
cc: R.W. Paskel, Superintendent
F R (RICk) Bowie
Rivanna
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296~5843 FAX (804) 979~1281
Charlotte Y Humphns
Jack ,Jou<:'1l
Edward H Bain, Jr
Samuel Miller
DavId P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F, Perkins
White Hall
Peter T, Way
Scollsvilli:'
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Al Waugaman, Director
Staff Services
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
September 17, 1991
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Reserve Room 5/6 For Joint Board of Supervisors/School
Board Meetings
This memorandum is to request that Room 5/6 be reserved for
Joint Board of Supervisors/School Board meetings the second
Wednesday of each month from 2:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. until otherwise
notified. However, the meeting of October 9, 1991, should be
reserved from 1:30 to 5:00 p.m.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
LEN:bwh