Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400058 Plan - Approved 2015-05-04SI7'E I VEMEN7' LAYOUT (TYP) A BASE INFORMATION SHOWN FROM PHYSICAL SURVEY BY B. AUBREY HUFFMAN AND ASSOCIATES, LTD FOR WESTGATE APARTMENTS & THE KNOLL DATED APRIL 1, 1994 iffices at Layout on2mmom, Maximum ImpervIo6s (Roofiop) Area 1,OOD sq. ft. per disconad non Treated ----------- [hi Lo Nqqst ftqmwth r09 76 feet .... .... .. Equal to longest tow path, but no lew, than 40 font 2 Disconnection sLopg c 2%, or < 5% with turf nintmemant -&i—enddownapoutsi—ft. m000KliL�ul Parking Distar" from buildings or foundations 1 ........... 000MR-L'i fhan 1%. Type of Pratmatmaht External (leaf screens, etc) , g , n For iiemattvs rmreduction off redu prac6cas, see the ap . pl Icable I a I pacification for 1. dais I criteria. ';ass Table I In this specificabon for allgibika practices and asmolated mWIffeation numbers. An alternative rur jolif reduction prac*x must be used when the disconnection length is lees than 40 feet. 3 Turf reltribroemani may include EC-2, EC-3, or other appropriate reinforoing matelials that are confirmed by the designer to be non -erosive !or the specific char risers and flow rates anticipated at each individual application, and acceptable to the plan approving authority. 4 Note that the downspout extension of 5 feet is intended for simple foundations. The use L be carefUlly designed and coordinated with the design of the stnztureVa water-proofing !X2!�rn-(tarvdatlon drains, etc.), or avoided StOWI'ller. Z 0 .'-4 co b044 U • �J co 0 Z UJ 0 (U 0 4-1 .......... . °° 1.4 �-4 'CD 0 W Q a P U CO � L) 0 CD 14- 0 O L (J CL .2 -CD Qr LJ O Lk 0 0� z 112q N SI7'E I VEMEN7' LAYOUT (TYP) A BASE INFORMATION SHOWN FROM PHYSICAL SURVEY BY B. AUBREY HUFFMAN AND ASSOCIATES, LTD FOR WESTGATE APARTMENTS & THE KNOLL DATED APRIL 1, 1994 iffices at Layout 32. 5' ACCESS AISLE — HCP SIGN 11 ,I I `—BUMPER 8 BLOCK DETAIL - TYPICAL PARKING AND HANDICAP SPACE NOT TO SCALE Iifil I li'41 1 fill VISITIBILITY OF ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR SHALL BE ELIMINATED. ENVIROO VA DEQ STORUWATER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO.1 ROOMP SEAMON 3: DESIGN TABLITo'S AND CRITERIA 3.1, Simple Rooftop DIsconnection Table 1.2 provides the p, rimary design criteria fbr isimptc rooftop disconnection. w Simple disoonnection is generally not advisable for residential lots less than 6,000 square le a in area, although it may be possible to enVloy one of the alternative mwff reduction practices on these lots (e.g., cistem infiltmdon, 9 Simple disoormection can be used on any post-construction, Ely*ologio: Soil Group. However, for Soil Groups C or D, Alternative :rLuwff reduction pracdoes (6.g., compost- amended fitter padi, rain garden, rainwater hanresting) can boost the runoff reduction rate. Also, crodibility of soils must be considered when designing simple disconnection. # Maintmiance of disonneacd downspoLAs usually involves the rqWar lawn or landscaping maintenance in the .filter path from the roof to the Greet. In wim, e cases, runoff from a simple disconnection may be directed to a more natural, undisturbed setting (i.e., whoTe lot grading and clearing is "fingerprintod" and the proposed filigr path is protested). Tkbh 1Z strMoo ft*fto D14*0firlection 0"lon CrHodo fi on2mmom, Maximum ImpervIo6s (Roofiop) Area 1,OOD sq. ft. per disconad non Treated ----------- [hi Lo Nqqst ftqmwth r09 76 feet Disconnection LwVth Equal to longest tow path, but no lew, than 40 font 2 Disconnection sLopg c 2%, or < 5% with turf nintmemant -&i—enddownapoutsi—ft. m000KliL�ul Parking Distar" from buildings or foundations arms) away from building If gtadeIr less 000MR-L'i fhan 1%. Type of Pratmatmaht External (leaf screens, etc) , g , n For iiemattvs rmreduction off redu prac6cas, see the ap . pl Icable I a I pacification for 1. dais I criteria. ';ass Table I In this specificabon for allgibika practices and asmolated mWIffeation numbers. An alternative rur jolif reduction prac*x must be used when the disconnection length is lees than 40 feet. 3 Turf reltribroemani may include EC-2, EC-3, or other appropriate reinforoing matelials that are confirmed by the designer to be non -erosive !or the specific char risers and flow rates anticipated at each individual application, and acceptable to the plan approving authority. 4 Note that the downspout extension of 5 feet is intended for simple foundations. The use of a dry well or ftan6h drain adjacent to an In-ground b asement or finished floor area should be carefUlly designed and coordinated with the design of the stnztureVa water-proofing !X2!�rn-(tarvdatlon drains, etc.), or avoided StOWI'ller. Z 0 .'-4 co b044 U co 0 32. 5' ACCESS AISLE — HCP SIGN 11 ,I I `—BUMPER 8 BLOCK DETAIL - TYPICAL PARKING AND HANDICAP SPACE NOT TO SCALE Iifil I li'41 1 fill VISITIBILITY OF ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR SHALL BE ELIMINATED. ENVIROO VA DEQ STORUWATER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO.1 ROOMP SEAMON 3: DESIGN TABLITo'S AND CRITERIA 3.1, Simple Rooftop DIsconnection Table 1.2 provides the p, rimary design criteria fbr isimptc rooftop disconnection. w Simple disoonnection is generally not advisable for residential lots less than 6,000 square le a in area, although it may be possible to enVloy one of the alternative mwff reduction practices on these lots (e.g., cistem infiltmdon, 9 Simple disoormection can be used on any post-construction, Ely*ologio: Soil Group. However, for Soil Groups C or D, Alternative :rLuwff reduction pracdoes (6.g., compost- amended fitter padi, rain garden, rainwater hanresting) can boost the runoff reduction rate. Also, crodibility of soils must be considered when designing simple disconnection. # Maintmiance of disonneacd downspoLAs usually involves the rqWar lawn or landscaping maintenance in the .filter path from the roof to the Greet. In wim, e cases, runoff from a simple disconnection may be directed to a more natural, undisturbed setting (i.e., whoTe lot grading and clearing is "fingerprintod" and the proposed filigr path is protested). Tkbh 1Z strMoo ft*fto D14*0firlection 0"lon CrHodo fi Page 7 of 12 on2mmom, Maximum ImpervIo6s (Roofiop) Area 1,OOD sq. ft. per disconad non Treated ----------- [hi Lo Nqqst ftqmwth r09 76 feet Disconnection LwVth Equal to longest tow path, but no lew, than 40 font 2 Disconnection sLopg c 2%, or < 5% with turf nintmemant -&i—enddownapoutsi—ft. m000KliL�ul �(161L�Inkarst Distar" from buildings or foundations arms) away from building If gtadeIr less 000MR-L'i fhan 1%. Type of Pratmatmaht External (leaf screens, etc) , g , n For iiemattvs rmreduction off redu prac6cas, see the ap . pl Icable I a I pacification for 1. dais I criteria. ';ass Table I In this specificabon for allgibika practices and asmolated mWIffeation numbers. An alternative rur jolif reduction prac*x must be used when the disconnection length is lees than 40 feet. 3 Turf reltribroemani may include EC-2, EC-3, or other appropriate reinforoing matelials that are confirmed by the designer to be non -erosive !or the specific char risers and flow rates anticipated at each individual application, and acceptable to the plan approving authority. 4 Note that the downspout extension of 5 feet is intended for simple foundations. The use of a dry well or ftan6h drain adjacent to an In-ground b asement or finished floor area should be carefUlly designed and coordinated with the design of the stnztureVa water-proofing !X2!�rn-(tarvdatlon drains, etc.), or avoided StOWI'ller. Page 7 of 12 SETBACKS FRONT-25' SIDE -15' REAR-20' Vlrptiroia RurxriP Radian parent f�SHtahaat • ��.� • terns 3494 site Cw" summary Total Rawdall A 48 Inches aft LOW CVW sinwmy OUM Of MinvP AFON 4 2M4W ftA 7W 809 Am 91 77T7 M i Ly I M 1-1 r Uml PrejaWArapium I on2mmom, DATE 07131 12014 uun k -W77 L77 [hi ld= 'M–M�m lu�'MEM m MEMO= Now MM 11 mmmm2.,u. own m000KliL�ul Own MEMEL.&AJ OEM 000MR-L'i NMLK�- NOMEME3 MONEOMTEli r II PROJ,# 20140174 Wnc) NEWL.J."'J MOM 00000m, C\2 cc) UJ W J, CD Z 0 .'-4 co b044 U co 0 Z UJ 0 (U 0 4-1 W °° 1.4 �-4 'CD 0 W Q a P U CO � L) 0 CD 14- 0 O L 0 CL .2 -CD Qr LJ O Lk 0 0� z 112q N �0 LLJ 117 - - ----- 6C LD 7N- -2 z. . ..... .... . SETBACKS FRONT-25' SIDE -15' REAR-20' Vlrptiroia RurxriP Radian parent f�SHtahaat • ��.� • terns 3494 site Cw" summary Total Rawdall A 48 Inches aft LOW CVW sinwmy OUM Of MinvP AFON 4 2M4W ftA 7W 809 Am 91 77T7 M i Ly I M 1-1 r Uml PrejaWArapium I on2mmom, DATE 07131 12014 uun k -W77 L77 [hi ld= 'M–M�m lu�'MEM m MEMO= Now MM 11 PrejaWArapium I on2mmom, DATE 07131 12014 uun k -W77 L77 [hi ld= 'M–M�m lu�'MEM m MEMO= Now MM 11 mmmm2.,u. own m000KliL�ul Own MEMEL.&AJ OEM 000MR-L'i NMLK�- NOMEME3 MONEOMTEli r II PROJ,# 20140174 Wnc) NEWL.J."'J MOM 00000m, C\2 cc) UJ W Drainap Area A Summary hand Cmr Summo DATE 07131 12014 uun k -W77 L77 [hi ld= 'M–M�m ONMJ MONK41-41-i mom woummau, moff&A-M L='umlrl: EMNIM Own MEMEL.&AJ OEM 000MR-L'i NMLK�- Drainap Area A Summary hand Cmr Summo 112m cdo ChadbArn(acm) DMnAmm 2A. smolle Distmartaft" to &,I W*- (spot a) mverftw DAM NO" acm If =11111 — DATE 07131 12014 uun k -W77 L77 [hi ` i i . i.goonim ONE E ommommm , is I co mmmmmm=o - monw-M ilmommim ONE M., nommommonsonom I I r.71-7,M7 11: Ri MM MENO ONE---� M NOMEME3 MONEOMTEli 112m cdo ChadbArn(acm) DMnAmm 2A. smolle Distmartaft" to &,I W*- (spot a) mverftw DAM NO" acm If =11111 — I nomommoLIZ-1-i L Sudorni, Lafl-fype ,Pa'via'tivad and Appruved'ciy �ha Ccrnrnuriity Levek',pirnem -',eparrnent 3, ird eau � DATE 07131 12014 uun k -W77 L77 C�2 I nomommoLIZ-1-i L Sudorni, Lafl-fype ,Pa'via'tivad and Appruved'ciy �ha Ccrnrnuriity Levek',pirnem -',eparrnent 3, ird eau � 0 U) I Q E rn c is, LT H 6,7 E S C a BRIAN C. MITCHELL Lic. No 035724 -0 02-04-2015 P 0 0 _SS/ ONAL 'EJ4' REVISIONS DATE ITEM 1110512014 COMMENTS_ 0210412015 COMMENTS V) l,2 0 CL 2 DATE 07131 12014 rn C�2 SCALE I co 0 Cn IRt ZN--qccrl3l TONY R. CARUSO, E.L T. CHECKED BY r II PROJ,# 20140174 Wnc) Yip C\2 cc) UJ W +5 co —4 r) 0 Z 0 .'-4 co b044 co 0 Z UJ 0 (U 0 4-1 W °° 1.4 �-4 0 W Q a P CO � L) 0 C0 1 01 14- 0 04 0 .2 O II 0 0 U) I Q E rn c is, LT H 6,7 E S C a BRIAN C. MITCHELL Lic. No 035724 -0 02-04-2015 P 0 0 _SS/ ONAL 'EJ4' REVISIONS DATE ITEM 1110512014 COMMENTS_ 0210412015 COMMENTS V) l,2 0 CL 2 DATE 07131 12014 SCALE I" = 20' 0 –3 PROJECT MANAGER BRIAN C. MITCHELL, P.E. DESIGNED BY TONY R. CARUSO, E.L T. CHECKED BY r II PROJ,# 20140174 SHEET # C / - ' GRASSY PLANTS TO BE REMOVE 85 SF HEDGE ROW TO BE REMOVED T.m.._ l 259 SF vv F . t ,'` � x , � ,f ut - vv ©v X X x r EXISTING QUERCUS p ALU STRI S �f ,IL (PIN OAK) ' c J` / ii ijft ;t \ \�� TO REMA s i SMALL SHRUBS - 8 t ,f ut - vv ©v X X x r EXISTING QUERCUS p ALU STRI S �f ,IL (PIN OAK) ' c J` / ii ijft ;t \ \�� TO REMA s PLANTINGS TO BE PROVIDED SMALL SHRUBS - 8 OTTO LUYKEN (MIN. 24 ") - 2 SMALL DECISUOUS - I AZALEA (MIN. 24 ") - 20 GRASSY PLANTS - 220 SF HEDGE ROWS- 259 SF c I" = 10' 3 O t PROJECT MANAGER 1 , DESIGNED BY TONY R. CARUSO, E.I.T. s way 4 CHECKED BY -o c v c -v PROJ.# 20140174 L �1 ° SHEET # 1 ..ww..:... ,, t i .q L A ° v� It x y- x X y- '�x x HEDGE TO BE ` REMOVED i t = x GRASSY PLANTS ..... m x TO �1= REMOVED x_ % I 1. SM ALL '; ,� E 13 LARGE 5 SF DECIDUOUS ,DECIDUOUS TQ AY ', BE REM OVEi �l j SM ALL \ s SHRUBS w s M— TO REMAIN i< �r A MAGNOLI PLANTING BE WITH ROW OF 20 , NEW AZALEAS —' 4 / r NE OFF �E,� AND �_�% 9LES %%— TER 7 OTTO LOCATION OTTO �v LUYKEN -� -J7 ' ✓ ....x w slit. ;rte I 11 NEW — OTTO LUYKEN TREE �s PROTECTION AD t \;t ��, /// l EX. MAGNOLIA rl �� 7 NEW TREE - OTTO LUYKEN,.,-- PROTECTION �J \�'� EXISTING TO BE REMOVED PLANTINGS TO BE PROVIDED SMALL SHRUBS - 8 OTTO LUYKEN (MIN. 24 ") - 2 SMALL DECISUOUS - I AZALEA (MIN. 24 ") - 20 GRASSY PLANTS - 220 SF HEDGE ROWS- 259 SF c ALL SITE PLANTINGS OF TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO REACH, AND BE MAINTAINED AT MATURE HEIGHT; THE TOPPING OF TREES IS PROHIBITED. SHRUBS AND TREES SHALL BE PRUNED MINIMALLY AND ONLY TO SUPPORT THE OVERALL HEALTH OF THE PLANT County of Albemarle Conservation flan Checklist — To be placed on Landscape Plans (Handbook, pp 111 -284 -111 -297 for complete specifications) I. The foliowlnQ Items shall be shown on the oJan• Q Trees to be saved; 0 Limits of clearing (outsido dripline oftreesto be saved); 0 Location and type of protective fencing; ❑ Grade changes requiting tree wells or walls; ❑: Proposed trenching: or tunneling beyond the limits of clearing. 2. markines: ❑ All trees; to be saved shall be marked with print or ribbon at a height clearly visible to equipment operators Ll No grading shall begin until the tree marking has been inspected and approved by a County Inspector. 3.'ronstraction Conference: ❑' Tree preservation and protection measures shall be reviewed with the contractor on site. 4. E !j ment0 erationandStora e: ❑ heavy equipment; vehicular traffic and storage of construction materials including soil shall not be permitted within the driplines of trees to be saved. 9. Soil Erosion and Stormwater Detention Devices: ❑ Such devices shall not adversely affect trees to be saved. 5. Fires:. ❑ Fires are not permitted within 100 feet of the dripline of trees to be saved. 7. Toxic Materials: Toxic materials shall not be stored within 100 feet of the dripline of trees to be saved. S. Protective Fencing- Ll Trees to be rettamed. within 40 feet of a proposed building or grading activity shall be protected by fencing.. Ll Fencing shall be in place and shall be inspected and approved by a County Inspector prior to grading or construction. 9. Tree Wells ❑ When the ground level must be raised within the dripline of a nee'to be saved, a tree well shall be provided and a construction detail submitted far approval. 10. TreeWiRlls- El When the ground level must be lowered within the drip] ine a tree to be saved, a tree wall shall be provided; and a construction detail submitted for approval 11. Trenching and Tunneling: LJ When trenching is required within the limits of clearing, it shall be done as faraway from the trunks of trees as possible. funneling under a large tree shall be considered as an altemad -ve when it is anticipated that necessary trenching will destroy feeder -roots. 12. Cleanup: ❑ Protective fencing shall be the last items removed during the final cleanup. 13. DsmapedTreest Ll Damaged frees shall be treated iimmediately `by pruning, fertilization or other methods, recommended by a tree specialist. NOTE: IT IS THE DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFER. WITH THE CONTRACTOR ON TREE CONSERVATION RMT11RFN1 -VNTG. CONTRACT PURCHASER SIGNATURE: (DATE) 511/06 page i of I 1 HEVINJUftly DATE ITEM 11 05 2014 COMMENTS 02 04 2015 COMMENTS C W N m C 3 F- O N a 0 n DATE 07131 12014 +' SCALE c I" = 10' 3 O t PROJECT MANAGER BRi1N C. MITCHELL, P.E. rn v DESIGNED BY TONY R. CARUSO, E.I.T. s CHECKED BY -o c v c -v PROJ.# 20140174 ° SHEET # -Al COUNTYOF ALBEIARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wng Charlottesville, Virginia 220n-41596 Phone (43D 2%-5,832 Fax (4�4) 9' 724126 August 8, 2014 David Mitchell 2619 Hydraulic Road Charlottesville, Va 22901 RE, SP201400012 Westgate/Barclay Place Dear Mr. Mitchell: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on July 15,2014, by a vote of 6:0, recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this recommendation is subject to the following conditions: I , Development of the use shall be in general accord with the conceptual plan received by staff on April 7, 2014, as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning Administrator. To be in general accord with the application plan, development and use shall reflect the following major elements within the development essential to the use, as shown on the plan: a. Office building mass and location b� Office parking Minor modifications to the plan may be made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance; 2. Now construction shall nut commence priorto the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Architectural Review Board; 3. Use shall be limited to property management services. Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please do one of the following: (1) Resubmit in response to Planning Commission recommendations (2) Request indefinite deferral (3) Request that your Board of Supervisors public hearing date be set (4) Withdraw your application View staff re L)ott and attachments View PC minutes Return,to agenda If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me at (434) 296-5832. Sincerely, Rachel Falkenstein Planner Planning Division 4 lILJ IIII.. .......... III'RGLA WEST, /,BA C) 7 PA EI 7 tA-RLE§- WV 9HARON JONES I-00-00-02700 IPARCEL II)i 060AI ZONING R-15 t7 tI�7 IIC> P__ I> I-7 ENCORE INVESTORS LIMITED 4 ItfJ_ _;`g ' 20 f, A . . ... ..... PARNERSHIP . . . . ...... .... SE Lp PARCEL ID: 0GOAl-00-00-02800 A IJ I;;CNIN -15 tItI,2 (7 �0 IIIIII............ L " IIIt7 (y IIIt '2 I.. . . ........ .. I15' 01 IISETBACK IIIt.... ..... r II. ........ . t. .... .... .. ...... ... Izl II\WESTGAT��ARMUAY PL&E,"' 1] �LC� b6lbO-010-00-b4M r.2 t... ... . . .. ... IIri ZPNING; PRD L t:3 3 -,v .... . . ..... . ....... ... . tIY' C� 7 7 4 C -5 ... . ..... A U Ite�_ IIII.... .... .. ItI�2 I�Aj A'-,,, ,]LACE 2 tI10 LP WE!STG:A`T.t 10, PiARCELI�� Ui� Q0 O I I tL 4 TP,A �;E G EN ORRIDOR IL U . . .. . . .. . . I:5 73 IIX� �zu �36 APPRO ._1;30 7 I-3 .. . ........ DISTIVRtANClt tIM talsigmiNG Ol _jIE�5 LOA I"ROUP '11 S 0 IW, IL) It.... ...... ... IA IIIIIItIJ IICL y . . .... V EXISUNG . . ..... . . J TIFF= L . ...... . .. . . .. 7- It011) ... .. ...... A LOCAT 0 Y, z ON �z C C3 V 110 T eo I-V JUT4 ... ...... . . ... . .. ..... 7 . ...... ... . ... ... .... I. ... . ........... IIE- 7 . ..... ... . ...... T RENVV 11 �A DECKI 57 . ...... 0 < II750SOF, T I6 -3 5 -3 c3 LD 'ADDITION TO t33 tXISTING B0 ...... .... . . . . .... .... 5 HEIGHTi *,, 5 IA II.......... . .. . .......... ... Ii-4 . .... ..... . -7 ... . . ..... . .... . .. ... .. . . . ....... . 3 25' SETBACK I REVISIMS DA TE ITEM 1110512014 COMMENTS 0210412015 COMMENTS L in0 CL DA TE 0 07131 1201, SCALE I" = 40' 0 inPROJECT MANAGER BR]AN C. MITCHELL, P.E. DESIGNED B7___) TONY R. CARUSO, E.I.T. CHECKED BY PROJ.# 20140174 SHEET # f C — 3 SITS' IMPR 0 VEMENT LA YO UT t TM»s' A' s • 7 ' s i e , .1 WEST / A T IJ : a x �.1 a i 4 '� {y\ r ....y r ••.. ,t;'k. 0,. C v J' ,,.y ^,.. I t Y J .,r" ',,,.� 'A JT l E , I A � , P D �� v • ,a _ �jt�, 5, t =., ' ENT A qE I.DC1jR r - EX \/1 EX. � i � 1 r � � ... .., ;"b,..,. .,...,.. �3 ,, A � V� Y ti " ,� LIGHT U (TYP)_ M„ J _ (p , Px r 2 Q � 1 C APPROX1 J. �30,0S`QFT ND _a r/r Ll Dp TUR8AN"CE ,N�ISTT`NG ❑F II L "SAM s E K. Y � 1 V C . IT iSSPOT SPOT% a J N 98.15' 97.95 EKE „ ^ 97.79' PROPOSED sx HVAC -PROPOSED 4 PVC FENCE 3 l til - , 3 I� i e �" N AREA OF LJMIT$ OF PAVEMENT �• MODIFICATION E P E 97.23' - 97.08' rl q E P 96.76' t b � J ' EKE r� 96.41 m, . VISITIBILITY OF ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM s W. I THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR SHALL BE ELIMINATED 20 40 w. r . HCP SIGN - Feet .m w, BASE INFORMATION SHOWN FROM PHYSICAL SURVEY BY B. AUBREY HUFFMAN AND ASSOCIATES, LTD FOR WESTGATE APARTMENTS & THE KNOLL DATED APRIL 1, 1994 CALCULATI01\1S 5' ACCE: AISLE "-BUMPER 8' BLOCK DETAIL - TYPICAL PARXING AND HANDICAP SPACE NOT TO SCALE SETBACKS FRONT -25' SIDE -15' REAR -20' c ]J-L'ITAILS VA DEQ STORMWA'TER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. i ROOFTOP 0ISICOUNECTION Vk%["k Rmwff R00000 ' pMleKW+afttmM— AS�Jun 2014 Site DaU Sums SECTION 3: DESIGN TABLES AND CRITERIA rote Raantalr a 48 lnChea 3,1. Simpk Rooftop Discouneedion Table 1.2 pTovides the pria'y desigrn cram fbr simple rooms disconnection, a Simple diwmection is gencrally gnat advisable for residential lots less 'dmn 6,000 square feet in arm, all ugh it may be possible to employ one of the alt tie Tunoff reduction practices on these bats (e.g., cistern, infil don, . Simple disconnection can be wwd on any post - construction Hydrologic Soil Owup. However, for Soil Groups C or D, alte atiVe .rLnwff reduction practioes ((..g:,, compost- amended filer path, rain Arden, minwator hamosting) can boast the runoff reduction rate. Viso, eradi ah%y of soils must be considered when designing simpler dls onnoc on. Maintenance of disoannecW downspouts usually involves the, regular lamm or landscaping maintenance in the fiber path frcmi the roof to the! street, In some eases, nmoff from a simple disconnection may be directed to a more natural, uintlisturi d setting (i.e., where lot grading [' If _i�i���.'�'� 777 Ly 1,000 . h. per disconnection Tr'eaW F�p�}�"��"��,, Longailit, flow inth rocrofl utte 76 fast — _ Diewrinection Len'oth Equal to longest flow path, but no h s than 40 feet 2 13�soonna on slops t 2 %, or 4 5% wrih turf reinforcement —(lift. r l[ i[ Extend downspautrr 5 ft. Ink4s-i- Distance from build ngs or foundations arose) away from building lfgrads %lo am 1 1[ Required Parking _ Type of Pretreatment External (teat sorresnsL* , For alternative ninoff reduction precdres, see ttla applicable spedfication for design.. criteria. See 'Table 11 In this spacit c tim for el igfts practices and amcclated specification numbers. z An alternative run aff reduction prate must be used when the dieconnection length Is less than 40 W. 3 Turf relnforcameni may include EC -2, Ems, or othenr appropriate reinforcirng matsdals that am confirmed by the designer to be wn� ve "or the specific chi dsltre and flow rates anficipsted at each individual appilostion, and acceptable to the plan al)pnMnq authority. • a .. . _ . be carefully ftsiglnpd and 000rdin>at:eci with 'the design of the stn srra °a water-pwfingi m fou tdatlon drains, etc.), or avoided altogether W z Cn Uw q 16 1L.11 Cd ([j V G rj � b [Proposed Offices Z W 0 CU ; ' ' S CM 0 UJ r^ v 1 to 4) � co 3 0 v/ rte4 0 Troposed Apartments �01111 N �•....•11 �C P4 o U r r: 0 • / O U W 3 N U U E xi Q -3 c o c N 0 ��pITH OF 0, o L i � W - I CHELL 0 Lic, No, 035724 02 -04 -2015 ,. „ ' � r N reduce the required parking E .. e * a * - .. affected buildings 0.83 spaces. SETBACKS FRONT -25' SIDE -15' REAR -20' c ]J-L'ITAILS VA DEQ STORMWA'TER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. i ROOFTOP 0ISICOUNECTION Vk%["k Rmwff R00000 ' pMleKW+afttmM— AS�Jun 2014 Site DaU Sums SECTION 3: DESIGN TABLES AND CRITERIA rote Raantalr a 48 lnChea 3,1. Simpk Rooftop Discouneedion Table 1.2 pTovides the pria'y desigrn cram fbr simple rooms disconnection, a Simple diwmection is gencrally gnat advisable for residential lots less 'dmn 6,000 square feet in arm, all ugh it may be possible to employ one of the alt tie Tunoff reduction practices on these bats (e.g., cistern, infil don, . Simple disconnection can be wwd on any post - construction Hydrologic Soil Owup. However, for Soil Groups C or D, alte atiVe .rLnwff reduction practioes ((..g:,, compost- amended filer path, rain Arden, minwator hamosting) can boast the runoff reduction rate. Viso, eradi ah%y of soils must be considered when designing simpler dls onnoc on. Maintenance of disoannecW downspouts usually involves the, regular lamm or landscaping maintenance in the fiber path frcmi the roof to the! street, In some eases, nmoff from a simple disconnection may be directed to a more natural, uintlisturi d setting (i.e., where lot grading [' If and cicaflng is "fingerprinted" and the proposed fili;cr path is protected). Tablla f.1 Simples ftoftyp Diuvnrwifon Design C tb' �r� , �,►�, _i�i���.'�'� 777 Ly 1,000 . h. per disconnection Tr'eaW F�p�}�"��"��,, Longailit, flow inth rocrofl utte 76 fast — _ Diewrinection Len'oth Equal to longest flow path, but no h s than 40 feet 2 and cicaflng is "fingerprinted" and the proposed fili;cr path is protected). Tablla f.1 Simples ftoftyp Diuvnrwifon Design C tb' �r� , �,►�, Version 1.9, March 1,2011' , 2011 Page 7 of 12 _i�i���.'�'� Maximum lm;arvlous (RrraafDop) Area 1,000 . h. per disconnection Tr'eaW F�p�}�"��"��,, Longailit, flow inth rocrofl utte 76 fast — _ Diewrinection Len'oth Equal to longest flow path, but no h s than 40 feet 2 13�soonna on slops t 2 %, or 4 5% wrih turf reinforcement —(lift. r l[ i[ Extend downspautrr 5 ft. Ink4s-i- Distance from build ngs or foundations arose) away from building lfgrads %lo am 1 1[ than 1%. _ Type of Pretreatment External (teat sorresnsL* , For alternative ninoff reduction precdres, see ttla applicable spedfication for design.. criteria. See 'Table 11 In this spacit c tim for el igfts practices and amcclated specification numbers. z An alternative run aff reduction prate must be used when the dieconnection length Is less than 40 W. 3 Turf relnforcameni may include EC -2, Ems, or othenr appropriate reinforcirng matsdals that am confirmed by the designer to be wn� ve "or the specific chi dsltre and flow rates anficipsted at each individual appilostion, and acceptable to the plan al)pnMnq authority. d Note that the do wnspout extension of 5 flat is intended for simple 1bundagm. The use sf a dry well or franoh drain adjacent to an In-ground basement or finishad1wr arsa should be carefully ftsiglnpd and 000rdin>at:eci with 'the design of the stn srra °a water-pwfingi m fou tdatlon drains, etc.), or avoided altogether Version 1.9, March 1,2011' , 2011 Page 7 of 12 Dralnager Area A Summary Lond Coumr Summonr omp medim prism" _i�i���.'�'� DMnArem BMW +�� d '. i F�p�}�"��"��,, ?yam-'• l� c -� d OEM, � r l[ i[ F��A'I . d [ am 1 1[ t r ;t Z .. W _ o o PROD# 20140174 V' CQC\2 0 SHEET C - I Dralnager Area A Summary Lond Coumr Summonr omp medim prism" cMda Am (Be" DMnArem BMW Z , ample m5w"MAM to Ma soib (snK 04 kmery bw mcm nKtw am l� c -� d OEM, � r l[ i[ F��A'I -. �A�.. Dralnager Area A Summary Lond Coumr Summonr omp medim prism" cMda Am (Be" DMnArem BMW Z , ample m5w"MAM to Ma soib (snK 04 kmery bw mcm nKtw am I MENEENOWs::a 0 DATE 07 / 31 / 2014 iic• fi?' 1iT: FTff� [+""'.'�a"1:^.'.nPTl!'_�arr��M� _ i +. I MENEENOWs::a V 0 DATE 07 / 31 / 2014 cM c rn c 0 U l� c I" = 20' o t PROJECT MANAGER c rn Fn v DESIGNED BY TONY R. CARUSO, E.L T. t Z �� W _ o o PROD# 20140174 V' CQC\2 0 SHEET C - I W W 4J �..� .F., Cd •� W z Cn Uw q 16 1L.11 Cd ([j V G rj � b C Z W 0 CU ; ' ' S CM 0 UJ r^ v 1 to 4) � co 3 0 v/ rte4 0 N �•....•11 �C P4 o U 0 v rn a� `-4 O U W 3 N U U W Q -3 c o c N 0 ��pITH OF 0, o L i � W BRIAN C. I CHELL 0 Lic, No, 035724 02 -04 -2015 ,. „ ' V REVISIONS DATE ITEM 11 05 2014 COMMENTS W0412015 2015 COMMENTS C w rn c 3 0 a� n 0 a DATE 07 / 31 / 2014 c rn c 0 U l� c I" = 20' o t PROJECT MANAGER c rn Fn v DESIGNED BY TONY R. CARUSO, E.L T. t � 3 W C S- PROD# 20140174 a 0 SHEET C - I W q 3 c E! �A r^ v 1 C� C 0 rte4 Inn..l�q�o �C Z, `-4 .Q U W c o O � o W °L l � r N REVISIONS DATE ITEM 11 05 2014 COMMENTS W0412015 2015 COMMENTS C w rn c 3 0 a� n 0 a DATE 07 / 31 / 2014 SCALE c I" = 20' o t PROJECT MANAGER BRIAN C. MITCHELL, P.E. rn Fn v DESIGNED BY TONY R. CARUSO, E.L T. t o CHECKED BY C S- PROD# 20140174 a 0 SHEET C - I i g =� j - n. p 51?.Y _.m GRASSY PLANTS TO BE REMOVED .�- . .. . �•.� 85 SF ��= HEDGE ROW TO BE REMOVED v v a.. 259 SF vV v °° 1 � r i i M iw- a a _ YL �x x x x * XXx HEDGE TO BE ti x x REMOVED , x GRASSY PLANTS - '` x TO BE REMOVED � X x LARGE SMALL x 1 35 SF (=DECIDUOUS TO °, DECIDUOUS BE REMOVEf { TO STAY _. SMALL \1��aIII %'r /f V SHRUBS �ry TO REMAIN , 77j N EX. MAGNOLIA A PLANTINGS TO BE PROVIDED Sl; y OTTO LUYKEN (MIN. 24 ") — 25 SMALL DECISUOUS — I AZALEA (MIN. 24 ") — 20 GRASSY PLANTS — 220 SF r EXISTING 1" = 10' QUERCUS PROJECT MANAGER PALUSTRIS v+ v (PIN OAK) T01NiY R. CARUSO, T. TO REMAIN CHECKED BY it i i pin � PLANTING BED WITH ROW OF 2 . NEW AZALEAS',_. it r _.w v ti c 3; w , NE L /�E TER OFFE M 7 NEW m r N OTTO LOCATION LUYKEN ic:E� ,� �, / N 7,—,-/ �-- - x 1Fffi!*aT:„ t • LUYKEN TREE rJJ, x�_ a= —_ _ z 'o ,n .. 1 ; 1 EX. 19 MAGNOLIA 7 NEW TREE - OTTO LUYKEN,/-- PROTECTION , �J "'\�M a :n 4 ' EXISTING TO BE REMOVED PLANTINGS TO BE PROVIDED SMALL SHRUBS — 8 OTTO LUYKEN (MIN. 24 ") — 25 SMALL DECISUOUS — I AZALEA (MIN. 24 ") — 20 GRASSY PLANTS — 220 SF HEDGE ROWS— 259 SF c ALL SITE PLANTINGS OF TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO REACH, AND BE MAINTAINED AT MATURE HEIGHT; THE TOPPING OF TREES IS PROHIBITED. SHRUBS AND TREES SHALL BE PRUNED MINIMALLY AND ONLY TO SUPPORT THE OVERALL HEALTH OF THE PLANT County of Albemarle Conservation Plan Checklist — To be placed on Landscape Plans (handbook, pp 111-284-111-291 tar complete specifications) 1. Thefollowing itemsshal bbe shown on th e Taut. Q Trees m be saved; ❑ Limits of clearing (outside dripline of trees to be saved); Ll' Location and type of protective fencing; ❑ Grade changes requiring tree wells or wails; L1 Proposed trenching ortunneling beyond the limits of clearing. 2. Marlines: ❑ All trees to be saved shall be marked with print or ribbon at a height clearly visible to equipment operators, ❑ No grading shall begin until die tree marking has been inspected and approved by a County Inspector, 3. PrCCOnstruetian Conference' Q Tree preservation and protection measures shall be reviewed with the contractor on site. 4. Equipment Operation and Storage ❑; Heavy equipment; vehicular traffic and storage of construction materials including soil shall not be permitted within the dri plines oftrees to be saved. 5. Soil Erosion and Stormwater Detention Devices: ❑' Such devices shall not adversely affect trees to be saved. b Fires. Q Fires are not permitted within 100 feet of the dripline of trees to be saved. 7. Toxic Materials: Toxic materials shall not be stored within 100 feet of the dripline of trees to be saved. 8. Protective Fencing: Q Trees to be retained within 40 feet ;of a proposed building or grading activity shall be protected by fencing. Ll Fencing shall be in place and shall be inspected and approved by a County inspector prior to grading or construction. 9 Tree Wells ❑ When the ground level Cmust be raised within the dripline of a tree to be saved,.atree well shall be provided and a construction detail submitted for approval. 10. Tree Walls., Q When the ground level; must be lowered within the dripline a tree io;be saved, a tree wall shall be provided; and a construction detail submitted for approval. II. Trenching and Tunneiint: When trenching is required within the limits of clearing, it shall be done as far away from the trunks of trees as possible. Tunneling under a large tree shall be considered as an alternative when it is anticipated that necessary trenching will destroy feeder roots. 12. Cleaouu: Q Protective fencing shall be the last items removed during the final cleanup.. 13. Damaged Trees: Q Damaged trees shall be treated immediately by pruning, fertilization or other methods recommended by a tree specialist. NOTE: IT IS THE DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFER WITH THE CONTRACTOR ON TREE CONSERVATION RE.OTARVNIFNTS. CONTRACT' PURCHASER SIGNATURE (DATE) 5/1/06 page 1 of 1 jb'fi IVjON]uivjb DATE ITEM 11 05 2014 COMMENTS 09/0412015 2015 COMMENTS c w a� in O N c 3 H w O m a 0 a DATE 07/31 /2014 +' SCALE c 1" = 10' O t PROJECT MANAGER BRIAN C. MITCHELL, P.E. v+ v DESIGNED B1E.I. T01NiY R. CARUSO, T. r CHECKED BY � c v c .v PROD.# 20140174 -° SHEET # C — 2 c O C� tf J r� 1 C/) V CC) Z �� LL WCQ 00 W Cd Z bw cd 0 Z� CD .,..,ern 0 W o a �co LU C � r_ Q co V/ Q) 0 .L w c 3 H 0 1 O U) U) Q LT H p7 :BRIAN C, Mif CHELL Lic, No. 035724 02 -04 -2015 _ 10 W �o W W E co Ww TE-4 i W l Q) W N W O ldEVlS'lONS DATE ITEM 11 05 2014 COMMENTS 02 04 2015 COMMENTS DATE 07131 12014 SCALE 1" = 40' PROJECT MANAGER BRIAN C. MITCHELL, P.E. DESIGNED BY TONY R. CARUSO, E.I.T. CHECKED BY PROJ.# 20140174 SHEET # C — 3 C! O U D D N O y.+ U N 7 N N 3 v c a� E 0 v+ c .L c c D C D v V L O L a O c a� c 0 U C N L 3 0 t 0 4 cp .3 0 v t 0 a� 0 L 0 C .Q 0 U C O U 7 O d N N t CD C .L N N C c w a� in w a� c 3 2 H w O a� CL 0 i Q a� s c 3 0 r 0 c .v+ N a� v a� v c D v+ c v 0